alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Railroad Retirement Board

Notice is hereby given in accordance with Public Law 92-463 that the Actuarial Advisory Committee will hold a meeting on May 30, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. at the office of the Chief Actuary of the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois, on the conduct of the 25th Actuarial Valuation of the Railroad Retirement System. The agenda for this meeting will include a discussion of the results and presentation of the 25th Actuarial Valuation. The text and tables which constitute the Valuation will have been prepared in draft form for review by the Committee. It is expected that this will be the last meeting of the Committee before publication of the Valuation.

The meeting will be open to the public. Persons wishing to submit written statements or make oral presentations should address their communications or notices to the RRB Actuarial Advisory Committee, c/o Chief Actuary, U.S. Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092.

Dated: April 16, 2012.

Martha P. Rico,

Secretary to the Board.

[FR Doc. 2012-9631 Filed 4-20-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wise Metals Group LLC (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David DAddario, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2008



By:

/s/ David DAddarioDavid DAddarioChairman and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 85 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 85

Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on February 
                               15, 2019.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2020

Mr. Castro of Texas submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on February 
                               15, 2019.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, pursuant to section 202 
of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622), the national 
emergency declared by the finding of the President on February 15, 
2019, in Proclamation 9844 (84 Fed. Reg. 4949) is hereby terminated.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R.
Clay Hulette, the Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ R. Clay
Hulette





R. Clay
Hulette


Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer


November
15, 2010
EPA Registration Jacket 2749-537 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64

*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
65
66
67
68

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
69
70
71
72
73

*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment* *Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
74

*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
75
76
77

*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment* *Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
______________________________________________________________ 

Page is not included in this copy. 

Pages 104 through 105 are not included in this copy. 

_______________________________________________________________ 

The material not included contains the following type of 

information: 

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

_____ Identity of product impurities. 

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process. 

_____ Description of quality control procedures. 

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

__X__ The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

_____ FIFRA registration data. 

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______. 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical 

 composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source 

 of the ingredient. 

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege. 

_____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the 

 Agency. 

_____ Internal Deliberative Information. 

 

 

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product 

registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who 

prepared the response to your request. 

_________________________________________________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000011913
<NAME> Beverly Bancorporation
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          25,698
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    175,530
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          30,797
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            30,703
<LOANS>                                        372,622
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,020
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 630,044
<DEPOSITS>                                     560,146
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,542
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,410
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,894
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 630,044
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 28,810
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               13,559
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   527
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                42,896
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              18,613
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,446
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           23,450
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      155
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  75
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 22,352
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,745
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,789
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,789
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.74
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,197
<LOANS-PAST>                                       508
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,524
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      368
<RECOVERIES>                                       709
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,020
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,388
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,632


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Orsus Xelent Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Guoji Liu,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)  The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August
19, 2009


By:
              /s/ Guoji LiuGuoji
      LiuChief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AMS Livestock & Poultry 

Program

January 3, 2024 

Associate Deputy Administrator

Deputy Administrator

Livestock, Poultry, & Grain 

Market News Division

Quality Assessment Division

Research & Promotion Division

Standards & Specifications 

Division

Operations and Planning Division

Chief of Staff
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1065 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1065

To provide for a study on the use of social media in security clearance 
                            investigations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2019

  Mr. Lynch introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a study on the use of social media in security clearance 
                            investigations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Media Use in Clearance 
Investigations Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. STUDY ON USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN SECURITY CLEARANCE 
              INVESTIGATIONS.

    Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall submit to 
Congress a report on the examination of social media activity during 
security clearance investigations, including--
            (1) the current use of publicly available social media in 
        security clearance background investigations;
            (2) any legal impediments to examining publicly available 
        social media activity, and whether those impediments are 
        statutory or regulatory in nature;
            (3) the results of any pilot programs to incorporate social 
        media checks in such investigations, including the 
        effectiveness and cost of such programs;
            (4) options for widespread implementation of the 
        examination of social media activity during such 
        investigations; and
            (5) estimates on the cost for such options as part of--
                    (A) all Top Secret investigations; or
                    (B) all Secret and Top Secret investigations.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CB Richard Ellis Realty Trust (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “ Report “), I, Jack A. Cuneo, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company. 

 

August 14, 2007 

 

38
# GTR Corn Table

# GTR Corn Table Redesign NMY

# GTR Corn Table Redesign

# 0314

# 0307

# 0229

# 0222

# 0215

# 0208

# 0201

# 0125

# 0118

# 0111

# 0104

# 1228

# 1221

# 1214

# 1207

# 1130

# 1123

# 1116

# 1109

# 1102

# Total

# 1026

# 1019

# 1012

# 1005

# 0928

# 0921

# 0914

# 0907

# 0831

# 0824

# 0817

# 0810

# 0803

# 0727

# 0720

# 0713

# 0706

# 0629

# 0622

# 0615

# 0608

# 0601

# 0525

# 0518

# 0511

# 0504

# 0427

# 0420

# 0413

# 0406

# 0330

# 0323

# 0316

# 0309

# 0302

# 0223

# 0216

# 0209

# 0202

# 0126

# 0119

# 0112

# 0105

# 1229

# 1222

# 1215

# 1208

# 1201

# 1124

# 1117

# 1110

# 1103

# 1027

# 1020

# 1013

# 1006

# 0929

# 0922

# 0915

# 0908

# 0901

# 0825

# 0811

# 0804

# 0728

# 0721

# 0714

# 0707

# 0630

# 0623

# 0616

# 0609

# 0602

# 0526

# 0519

# 0512

# 0505

# 0428

# 0421

# 0414

# 0407

# 0331

# 0324

# 0317

# 0310

# 0303

# 0224

# 0217

# 0210

# 0203

# 0127

# 0120

# 0113

# 0106

# 1230

# 1223

# 1216

# 1209

# 1202

# 1125

# 1118

# 1111

# 1104

# 1028

# 1021

# 1014

# 1007

# 0930

# 0923

# 0916

# 0909

# 0902

# 0826

# 0819

# 0812

# 0805

# 0729

# 0722

# 0715

# 0708

# 0701

# 0624

# 0617

# 0610

# 0603

# 0527

# 0520

# 0513

# 0506

# 0429

# 0422

# 0415

# 0408

# 0401

# 0325

# 0318

# 0311

# 0304

# 0225

# 0218

# 0211

# 0204

# 0128

# 0121

# 0114

# 0107

# 1231

# 1224

# 1217

# 1210

# 1203

# 1126

# 1119

# 1112

# 1105

# 1029

# 1022

# 1015

# 1008

# 1001

# 0924

# 0917

# 0910

# 0903

# 0827

# 0820

# 0813

# 0806

# 0730

# 0723

# 0716

# 0709

# 0702

# 0625

# 0618

# 0611

# 0604

# 0528

# 0521

# 0514

# 0507

# 0430

# 0423

# 0416

# 0409

# 0402

# 0326

# 0319

# 0312

# 0305

# 0227

# 0220

# 0213

# 0206

# 0130

# 0123

# 0116

# 0109

# 0102

# 1226

# 1219

# 1212

# 1205

# 1128

# 1121

# 1114

# 1107

# 1031

# 1024

# 1017

# 1010

# 1003

# 0926

# 0919

# 0912

# 0905

# Mexico

# China

# Japan

# Colombia

# Korea

# Taiwan

# Peru

# Egypt

# Venezuela

# Ranking 2022-23

# Ranking 2021-22

# Rankings 2020-21

# Rankings 2019-20

# Top 5 Rankings (2020-21)

# Top 5 Rankings (2019-20)

# Top 5 Rankings

# River Analysis

2012-13 Corn Exports Sales and Shipments vs. 3-yr Average

# Sheet1

# Top Rankings 2019-20

# Chart2

# image1.png
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 11 , 2023

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 23

- 00175

- CV

DIANA INGRID REISMANN SEXTON , Appellant

V.

GILBERT SEXTON , Appellee

On Appeal from the 505th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial C our t Cause No. 19

- DCV

- 264966

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal from an order denying a motion to recuse signed
M arch 1, 2023

. An order denying a motion to recuse may be reviewed on appeal
f

rom the final j udgment. Tex. R. Civ . P . 18a(j )(1)(B ). T here is no f inal judgment in
this matter.
Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v.
Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not dispose of all pending parties and claims, the orders remain interlocutory and unappealable2 until final judgment is rendered unless a statutory exception applies. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson , 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps , 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). There are no statutory provisions authorizing an interlocutory appeal from an order denying a motion to recuse a judge. See In re Hart , 460 S.W.3d 742, 7 43 (Tex. App.

— Fort
Worth 2015, no pet. ).

On April 19, 2023, notification was transmitted to the parties of this c ourt’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating g rounds for contin uing the appeal on or before May 1,
2023

. See Tex. R. App

. P . 42.3(a). Appellant did not file a response.
Accordingly, the ap peal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices J ewell, Hassan, and Wilson.
391 A.2d 695

#### Commonwealth v. Plessinger, Appellant.

Argued March 13, 1978.

John M. O’Connell, Jr., with him O’Connell, Silvis & Godlewski, for appellant; Gary Deane Wilt, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
#### Karen Anderson STUCKI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Franklin S. STUCKI, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 14563.

Supreme Court of Utah.

March 29, 1977.

Patrick H. Fenton, Cedar City, for defendant-appellant.

Michael W. Park, Cedar City, for plaintiff-respondent.

HALL, Justice:

Plaintiff obtained a decree of divorce from defendant on June 21, 1973. The decree awarded plaintiff alimony in lieu of property settlements in the amount of $12,-000, payable at $300 per month. Plaintiff filed a motion to modify the decree alleging change of circumstances that would warrant a continuation of alimony after the sum of $12,000 was paid. The same was heard on March 1, 1976, and denied by the court in the absence of a showing of a substantial change of circumstances. The sole question raised by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in refusing to modify the decree.

The resolution of this matter requires the interpretation of Sec. 30-3-5, U.C.A.1953, which confers continuing jurisdiction upon the court to make such subsequent changes or new orders with respect to support, maintenance, custody, or distribution of property as shall be reasonable and necessary; and this section has been construed numerous times by this court. This section has been construed, practically since its enactment, to confer jurisdiction upon the court to make changes with regard to the distribution of property only in cases where there has been a change in circumstances or condition of a party since the entry of the original decree.1

The facts of this case are that at the time the original decree was entered the court made findings of fact that plaintiff suffered from a heart ailment of considerable extent, that her health was impaired, and that she was entitled to lump sum alimony in lieu of a property settlement. Plaintiff’s testimony at the time of trial was to the effect that she was not working and did not intend to.

The same judge heard the motion to modify and at the time the court ruled on the *241motion, he also made the observation that he had a recollection of *plaintiff’s health, lack of, and intention not to seek employment.*

Plaintiff’s assertions of present inability to work and no probability of inheritance were duly considered by the court and found not to be of sufficient magnitude to dictate a modification of the decree and with that conclusion we agree.

This court must review the whole evidence in the light most favorable to the findings of the trial court and will not disturb them merely because it might view the matter differently, but only if evidence clearly preponderates against the findings.2 The case of *Ridge v. Ridge,*supra, cited by plaintiff is also supportive of this proposition.

Affirmed. Costs to defendant.

ELLETT, C. J., and CROCKETT, MAU-GHAN and WILKINS, JJ., concur.

1

. *Dixon v. Dixon,*121 Utah 259, 240 P.2d 1211; *Ridge*v. *Ridge,*Utah, 542 P.2d 189.

2

. *Stone v. Stone,*19 Utah 2d 378, 431 P.2d 802.