alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED MARCH 16, 2010 in] r^ ; -nQMlnllOH 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

INTERTECH OVERLOAD, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10WP0003 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS NO. FAA-2010-0194 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2008WP010016) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 

Rondie A. Yoder /" ^ J 

Chief Administrative Law Judge y / 
FAA Docket No. CP10WP0003 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

William H. Schultz, Respondent's Counsel 

Schultz Law Firm 

32123 Lindero Canyon Road, Suite 203 

Westlake Village, CA 91361-5412 

TEL: 818-901-1919 

FAX: 818-901-1996 

Dean Cambe, Sr., President 

Intertech Overload, Inc., Respondent 

7701 Woodley Avenue 

VanNuys,CA 91406 

Courtney Adolph, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Coxmsel 

Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7128 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building - Room 

2014, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

!•« >
EXHIBIT 99.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<S>   <C>                 <C>    <C>
The undersigned hereby certifies, in my capacity as an officer
of Boston Edison Company, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

  (i)  the enclosed Annual Report of Boston Edison Company on
       Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully
       complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (ii) the information contained in such Report fairly presents,
       in all material respects, the financial condition and
       results of operations of Boston Edison Company.

Dated:  March 27, 2003      By:   /s/ THOMAS J. MAY
                                  Thomas J. May
                                  Chairman, President and
                                  Chief Executive Officer

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Orsus Xelent Technologies,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wang Xin,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                                      By: /s/ Wang Xin
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Wang Xin
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                         August 21, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6455

SHAWNDELL MONTE MCFARLIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SCOTT S. HARRIS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (2:18-cv-03198-CMC)

Submitted: August 22, 2019 Decided: August 26, 2019

Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shawndell Monte McFarlin, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Shawndell Monte McFarlin appeals the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing McFarlin’s complaint. The

district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) 

(2012). The magistrate judge recommended that the complaint be dismissed and advised

McFarlin that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive 

appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is 

necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the 

parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 

F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). 

McFarlin has waived appellate review by failing to file timely objections after receiving 

proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Courtney C. Smith, certify that:
**1.** **I have reviewed this quarterly report on****Form 10-Q****ofSpecialty Underwriters’ Alliance, Inc.;** **2.** **Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this quarterly report;** **3.** **Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;** **4.** **The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-****15(e)****and15d-****15(e)****) for the registrant and have:**
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; (b) [Intentionally Omitted]; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
 

 

**5.** **The registrant’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):**
(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: December 23, 2004       /s/ Courtney C. Smith       Courtney C. Smith
|    |                                                                                                         |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No.1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bemis Company, Inc.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
| Date   | March 12, 2018 |   | By | /s/ Michael B. Clauer |
|   |   |   |   | Michael B. Clauer, Senior Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit
        32.1
 **CERTIFICATION**
  **Pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 **(Section
        1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Orsus Xelent Technologies, Inc. (the
        “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
        Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Wang Xin,
        Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
        1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
  (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: August
                14, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Wang
                XinWang
                  Xin
                Chief
                  Executive Officer
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
··, 

coufi. T Df CR.IIYII AJ!lL APPE!tLS ~ f TtXA.S 

DfFlCt tJ F (Itt CLEf<~ 

mnr<. 31\ J..0/5 

( 

\ 

HONDR.A-13Lf CDUA T 6 P C RL YIIJ J;JAL J4Pflf f)LS, ABEL ACOSTA, C/E,f)( 

C.DUftT DF CIUMJN11L APPEALS Of /£XA.S. 

P. Dl BOX IJ..3Df{ ClfPITfJL STitT/0)../ 

AUST /Jv , TJ[XrlS 7g711 

Rf ~ RAY A. fJJXDN V. THE. .ST!t'(E !JP TEXAS 

No, LJR- to, ~ o J- OJ.. ~ TRL c1. No) /J.tfl- os;t.,~ J:L --A 

t>flff\ fYlf\ I ACDSTA : 

C£ ,· ,. ~ ' 

£NC£-DSE£J FO~ FILING IS MOVIINIS !?UL£ 1?./fEI/£11~/Nt (J!J!JEIT ,f(JLE Zi 

)) 

C!tlfllltNitL t.JtlJ &UEST/Oi.J>,ON A/11£/J/J 

fLEil.S£ GillE /11()1/CI! LJJl[);l/ fiECE!PT. 

TJifJJJt'. YDU AI!.S?EC7 PULLY FOA. Yovlt. !l-SSISTIINCI!. 

MOTION ~IMIED 

DATE: -aQ-6 

BY: 1> CRECEIVED IN . · COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS _ 

APR 1 C 22~S 
•· 

RAY !+.. DIXON 

/VIDVANT" 

V. 

1H L\> TPl Y~ D f JE)l!lS 

~E:SPOAlDENT I 

CDUILT Df CAIMJIJAL Af'.fEirL.S Of T£XI1S 

ltUS TJN TEXAS 

Wt(-8b,J.b/..-DL 

7~L.GT. NO- j.'i{ -{)SJ.&-I:J. -A 

RULE 7q, REHE.AittNG- UN/Jffl. RULE 74 

C.P-.1 fVIl NAL LALJ fJ.UESTl/JIJ5,~rJ Af'IJ'£/'I.JJ :> 

f'tlDVAN 1 CDMlJ tN CDfYJPL IHI.JCE IN A J)fi.DCEEJJJJ.J(; IN TU£ C.DU!i T tJf CI?!M INAL ltfJfJlAL S IJRtJJ6S 

TD T/£1E tOU!\ 7 IJPEN &UESTJDN3 REVII!LJ !JN AMtrl'liJJNC- A STilT!! LJJ.IT tJf IIA~EIJS. CtMPUS 

1JfVItLY. 

LtG-AL ANAYLSIS 

l L 

MDlJIINT FILED tN T/-J£. -ovAL CDUIIT ll fVJOTJON f(}A. tfflVe TD Af1£/'I/J b-!UJ/Jf/1) TLJO ()Af fJ£JJ.IJIJtJt. 

_S TA 7/~ I.Jfi./1 Of 11AIJEJfS COAPUS ''JIPflLICArtO)J f:'/Jil.J11, AFTefi. ASSefi.T!NC. 6~DUAjlJ !JNI! tJNL'/, ON TIIE·'Fll_4/~t~. •' 

SUCH FILING BY CLE.IH< .57AMP JJI1TE JIIN Z ~DIS II: JJ/ AfYI WilEN Lt71£fi fD 7JIE Ct£1(1( IS IJATEl) f)Ec."d'l:. 

~0/5 .• , WHitt-/ ;:s 111Ll/J AJ { .I.ETrtA r,f/)/'1 J)e..PBvnnNr) /INIJ J.ltJ7 /1 /IM?loAI /})£ 111e S//JltrA TITLE/J. 

FUATJ.I£fl.. ll.UEjTIDAIABLE f,£VItbJ ..• IH€ f/NIJ!JJC.. Of FACTS /IAI/J CtJJ..ICLU5!0N of Ullu tJ./.5 Co/11/JUtleiJ 

IJY 7Hf TfilAL C1Jt)tf.1 IJ£C., d.J~J.()/S,. Ttflt-6-E/rl/11£ 1/.f!S COtJA..TS fY/11/L MY. fiULIAI£ 171117 /I-PIL!€S AT 

1HI.s rtfYI e uNIJI!tt s rnrJI AJJIJ FtJJe~AL J...lltu, 

WNA1.S ' &VESTLDNABLE. IJN ITS FACE •• ., IS b.JJIY THE CLElXS !)ffiC.E FILEl> /J TlfYIELY }J!)7/t£ /JJTift C.OI)Il1S " FINDING-S\ ANJJ N01 A TIMeLY A/07/CE {)f TilE LEIIilt To APJE/11/J ftJ071tJ.AJ IJY JYIOVI'I#T 

MJIJ WH£THt1<. 71-11~ ACY i.JAS CJ)tJDUCT[JJ TD SHD~ TH/f-1 l)-J£COVI.7 fJNIJ/JiiG.S Lt)lfs FJI?ST /JN/) 1'10~)11 

EFf/Jif.T tJAs A DIIY L!fT/!4, AJJJ'J /;INniNt..S tJIJS A /JAY SOtJ/J At 1111! CLE,f/(5lJ!sctfe77oJ./. 

~C>VANT .SOLt. CLAim IS TlfE f!JU£ST/ON1!8Lt £)Jf/ANC£MEN1 flfOCES.S 10 13/MATH Jl FltffT /JI!t..fEE 

FtLONY, 

CON tLU.S JON (< 

FDI\ Tt+E. FO!f.ECslJIN& ftEASONS·ST!ITEIJ IN THIS RULE 79,/lEHEA~/N& tJNIJEI? l?tJLE 7.1/. Cfi/J111AIAL Lllkl 

&iJEgTfDN~ ON AMEND

11

WJ..IER£ PEJJbliJG lJRtT IS ND1 f /NAL-LY AULEJ) 0/Ju J3Y TilE CDAIVICT!fJG 

tDUitTS FlNCWJGS. MOVANT ASJ{ THAT TIUS C.O/JAT tJ{- Cf?.IMIIJALAP~£!1LS &~ANT fiE LIEf SOU£.111 

. SOA $PDNTE. ~ 1\~q:)r .~VI1Nf- se
Identification of NonhazardousIdentification of NonhazardousSecondary Materials that are SolidSecondary Materials that are SolidWastesGeorge FaisonEPA ORCRScrap Tire Reuse and RecyclingWebinarFebruary 23, 2009TOPICS•Background on the Rulemaking•ANPRM•ScheduleBACKGROUNDBACKGROUND•Scrap tires, used oil, biomass and coal refuse areexamples of materials assessed in the rulemaking•Units combusting the material include boilers, cementkilns, process heaters•Estimate 136,000 units in allBACKGROUNDBACKGROUND•Materials determined to be solid waste and burnedin combustion units are subject to CAA 129requirements•Materials determined not to be a solid waste wouldbe subject to CAA 112 requirements•Solid waste definition to be determined byAdministrator according to RCRABACKGROUNDBACKGROUND•CAA 129 thought to be more stringent– Limits for 9 specific pollutants– Management requirements•Stigma attached to being solid waste incinerator ?•Effort is a result of June 2007 DC Court of Appeals rulingvacating and remanding Commercial and Industrial SolidWaste Incineration Definition Rule and Boiler MACTRuleANPRM•Published January 2, 2009•Identifies 2 key factors for solid wastedetermination– Whether material has been discarded– If discarded, has it been processed to produce alegitimate fuel•Lays out criteria for legitimacyANPRM•Categories of materials in ANPRM notconsidered to be a solid waste include:traditional fuels; secondary materials used aslegitimate fuels not previously discarded;discarded secondary materials processed intolegitimate fuel•Whole tires from tire piles fed to combustionunits would be a solid waste under ANPRMSTATE COMMENTSSTATE COMMENTS•States need to be concerned with managementof materials before arrival at combustion site•Want to promote beneficial use•Regulating whole tires as solid waste whenburned as fuel could disrupt recycling markets ?IN CONCLUSIONIN CONCLUSION•Rulemaking applies to application of CAA 112 and 129only; should not impact other Subtitle D activities i.e.land filling, composting•Do not want to undercut state solid waste managementauthority, beneficial use programs•Schedule – to be signed by April 15 together with BoilerMACT and CISWI rulemakings•http://www.epa.gov/waste/nonhaz/definition.htm
#### Robert D. O’Connell, P. C., et al., Appellants, v Schlegel Corporation et al., Respondents, and Charles P. Schlegel, II, Intervenor-Respondent.

(Appeal No. 4.)

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Boehm, J., and intervenor’s motion for sanctions denied. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Boehm, J.—Discovery.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.1**
 
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14( a) AND 15 d -14( a ) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 AND SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, Harvey Zinn, the President and Chief Executive Officer of SNB Bancshares, Inc. certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SNB Bancshares, Inc. (the "Registrant");
 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
 4.
The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 
 c)
disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 
 5.
The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 
 a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
 b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over fnancial reporting.  **SNB BANCSHARES, INC.**Date:   November 15, 2004
By:
/s/ Harvey ZinnPresident and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 22804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9255]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-12-011]


Sunshine Act Meeting; Correction

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Federal Register CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 77 FR 22344.

ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED TIME AND DATE: April 17, 2012 at 9:30 a.m.

CORRECT TIME AND DATE: April 17, 2012 at 11 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

ACTION: In accordance with 19 CFR 201.35(d)(1), notification is hereby 
given that the public meeting of April 17, 2012, is being held at 11 
a.m.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Agendas for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701-TA-477 and 731-TA-1180-1181 (Final) 
(Bottom Mount Combination Refrigerator-Freezers from Korea and Mexico). 
The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determinations 
and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before 
April 30, 2012.
    5. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701-TA-478 and 731-TA-1182 (Final) (Certain 
Steel Wheels from China). The Commission is currently scheduled to 
transmit its determinations and Commissioners' opinions to the 
Secretary of Commerce on or before April 30, 2012.
    6. Outstanding action jackets: none.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: April 12, 2012.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. 2012-9255 Filed 4-13-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
April 9, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DARREN TRAVELL HUGHES, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00864-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the 

appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.