alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NARCISO CENDEJAS VAZQUEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-71696

Agency No. A090-489-256

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 7, 2015** 

Before: FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Narciso Cendejas Vazquez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

FILED

APR 14 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785,

791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Cendejas Vazquez’ motion

to reopen as untimely, where he filed the motion more than eight months after his

final order of removal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (a motion to reopen must be

filed within 90 days of a final order of removal), and does not dispute that his

motion was untimely or invoke any exception to the motions deadline, see LopezVasquez v. Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th Cir. 2013) (a petitioner waives a

contention by failing to raise it in the opening brief).

To the extent Cendejas Vazquez contends that the agency erred in declining

to invoke its sua sponte authority to reopen proceedings, we lack jurisdiction to

consider that claim. See Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder, 633 F.3d 818, 823-24 (9th

Cir. 2011) (this court lacks jurisdiction to review the agency’s sua sponte

determinations).

In light of this disposition, we do not reach Cendejas-Vazquez’ remaining

contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

2 13-71696
# GTR Tables

# Data

# Info

# Selected Hist. Rates

# Notes

# image1.png
Microbiological Data Program (MDP) Testing History

Commodities Tested 

Commodity Start Date End Date

Alfalfa Sprouts January 2006 November 2012

Cantaloupe July 2002 December 2008

Cantaloupe October 2009 November 2012

Celery October 2001 June 2004

Cilantro July 2004 December 2005

Cilantro October 2009 November 2012

Green Onions July 2004 September 2007

Green Onions April 2009 September 2009

Hot Peppers April 2009 November 2012

Lettuce, Leaf April 2001 June 2004

Lettuce, Romaine April 2001 June 2004

Lettuce (Leaf or Romaine) July 2004 August 2006

Lettuce (Leaf or Romaine) January 2010 December 2010

Lettuce, Pre-Bagged (conventional or 

organic) April 2007 December 2008

Lettuce, Pre-Bagged January 2010 November 2012

Lettuce, Pre-Bagged (ORGANIC) February 2009 December 2009

Lettuce, whole Romaine (conventional) February 2009 December 2009

Parsley July 2004 December 2005

Spinach (loose or packaged) February 2008 December 2010

Spinach, Pre-Bagged January 2010 November 2012

Tomatoes (all types) May 2001 March 2008

Tomatoes, Cherry/Grape January 2010 November 2012

Tomatoes, Roma/Plum April 2009 December 2011

Special Surveys

Commodity Start Date End Date

Special Survey for Salmonella in Cilantro, 

Hot Peppers, Green Onions, Bulb Onions July 2008 September 2008

Special Survey for Salmonella in Peanut 

Butter February 2009 September 2009

Microorganisms Tested 

Organism Start Date End Date

Salmonella April 2001 November 2012

Generic E. coli April 2001 March 2009

Pathogenic E. coli April 2001 November 2012

E. coli O 157:H7 April 2004 November 2012

Total Coliform (lettuce/spinach) April 2007 December 2008

Total Viable Count (lettuce/spinach) February 2008 December 2008

Shigella February 2008 December 2008

Listeria monocytogenes October 2011 November 2012

6/19/2013
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. BE RT TR AV I S L I TT LE OW L, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 11- 30248 D . C. N o . 1 : 1 0 - c r - 0 0 0 9 8 - RFC ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe D i s tr i c tof

M ont a na R i c ha r d F . C e bul l , C hi e f Judge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d Jul y17, 2012 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , T H O M A S , an dS IL V E R M A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. B ertT ravi s L i tt l e O w l appeal s f rom the 16 8-m on th sent ence i m po se d f ol l ow i ng hi s j ury - tr i a l c onvi c t i on f ora ggr a va t e d s e xua l a s s aul t , i n vi ol a t i on of 18 U . S . C . §§ 1153( a ) a nd 2241( c ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291, a nd 

# FI LED JU L 27 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 30248 2 w e a f f i rm. L i tt l e O w l c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourte rr e d byba s i ng hi s s e nt e nc e on the f a ls e p r e s u m p tio n th a t h e h a dc o m m itte do th e rs e x u a l o f f e n s e s . T h is c o n te n tio n is be l i e d bythe r e c or d. L ittle O w l a ls o c o n te n d s th a t h is s e n te n c e is s u b s tan tiv e lyu n r e a s o n ab le because i tdo es no tre fl ec thi s m edi ca l needs or hi s hi st ory and pers on al c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s . U n d e rth e t o t a l i tyo f th e c i r c u ms t a n c e s a n dth e 1 8 U . S. C. § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) s e n te n c in g f

a c to r s , th e s e n te n c e is s u b s tan tiv e lyr e a s o n ab le . See G al l v. U ni ted States , 55 2 U . S . 38 , 51 (200 7). AF F I RME D.
=. 

- 

west virginia department of environmental protection SIGN-IN SHEET 

Public Hearing on proposed 2014 Division of Air Quality Rules 45CSR8,45CSR14,45CSR16,45CSR18,45CSR19,45CSR25 and 45CSR34 

July 8,2013,6:00 p.m. 

The Department of Environmental Protection asks for the information below so that agency staff may provide responses and information about 

decisions to you. The infomation you voluntarily provide on this sheet becomes part of the public record related to this topic and may be released if 

requested under the Freedom of Information Act. 

Name (please print) 

..Jp p&q . . .-, 

/. .. - - 

\ 

Address 

,vm.~& - 

I 

Organization 

D? 

Phone E-mail Comment 

Y/N
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Salvatore DAuria, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tut Systems, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



By:/s/    SALVATORE DAURIASalvatore DAuria Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)




Date: October 30, 2003
-79.0 -78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0 -75.5

38.0 38.5 39.0 39.5 40.0



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/17 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.50 N 76.81 WMeters AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                    Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                      Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                    520
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                             849
<ALLOWANCES>                              (20)
<INVENTORY>                               177
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         1877
<PP&E>                                    710
<DEPRECIATION>                           (438)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          11288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    6166
<BONDS>                                  2842
<COMMON>                                 3057
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                812
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            11288
<SALES>                                 10004
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        10009
<CGS>                                    8620
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           11597
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       (187)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (4778)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (1775)
<DISCONTINUED>                          (3003)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            (4778)
<EPS-BASIC>                            (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (.16)

</TABLE>
#### Louis GONZALES, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

No. 3397.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

April 6, 1979.

Lawrence J. Kulik and Alex Swiderski, Anchorage, for appellant.

Thomas M. Jahnke and Randy M. Olsen, Asst. Dist. Attys., Harry L. Davis, Dist. Atty., Fairbanks, Avrum M. Gross, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellee.

OPINION

Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., and CON-NOR, BOOCHEVER, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In our prior opinion in this appeal, we explicitly retained jurisdiction of Gonzales’ sentence appeal and deferred ruling on its merits until we had resolved the issues in Gonzales’ appeal in Supreme Court No. 3348.1

In a separate opinion handed down today in Gonzales’ appeal in Supreme Court No. 3348, we determined, in part, that Gonzales’ two consecutive twenty-year terms of imprisonment for narcotics sales should be vacated and remanded to the superior court for further sentencing proceedings for the reasons expressed in *Gonzales v. State,*582 P.2d 630, 636 (Alaska 1978).2 It follows that the sentence in the instant appeal also is vacated and the case remanded to the superior court for resentencing in accord with the rulings made in *Gonzales v. State,*582 P.2d 630, 636 (Alaska 1978), and today’s separate opinion in *Gonzales v. State,*593 P.2d 257 (Alaska 1979).3

The case is Remanded for further sentencing proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

1

*.Gonzales v. State,*586 P.2d 178, 181-82 (Alaska 1978). In retaining jurisdiction, we concluded that: Given the length of the sentences involved in the *Gonzales*cases and their close interrelationship, we conclude that it would be inappropriate to decide the sentence appeal in the case at bar at this time.

2

. *See also Carlson v. State,*560 P.2d 26 (Alaska 1977).

3

. This case is remanded to the Honorable Ralph E. Moody for resentencing. For an explanation of why the matter of resentencing is remanded to Judge Moody, see our opinion in *Gonzales v. State,*593 P.2d 257, at 262, n. 16, (Alaska 1979).
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0306. LEROY INGRAM v. THE STATE.

In 2002, Leroy Ingram was convicted of rape and false imprisonment. We

affirmed his convictions on appeal. Ingram v. State, 280 Ga. App. 467 (634 SE2d

430) (2006). In 2014, Ingram filed a motion to set aside his judgment of conviction

under OCGA § 17-9-4. The trial court denied the motion, and Ingram seeks

discretionary review. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

Although OCGA § 17-9-4 provides that a void judgment is a nullity, “this

provision does not authorize a departure from the recognized procedures for

challenging a criminal conviction.” Wright v. State, 277 Ga. 810, 811 (596 SE2d

587) (2004). “[A] petition to vacate or modify a judgment of conviction is not an

appropriate remedy in a criminal case.” Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1) (686

SE2d 786) (2009). Any appeal from an order denying or dismissing such a motion

must be dismissed. See Harper, supra; Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532 (690 SE2d 150)

(2010). Accordingly, this application is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

1

1

Ingramcomplainsthat although the caption of the trial court’s dismissal order

is correct, the body of the order refers to him by the wrong name. This clerical error,

however, does not entitle Ingram to any relief.

March 31, 2015
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/31/2015
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 24491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9861]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, April 26, 2012 at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 
Correction and Approval of the Minutes for the Meeting of April 12, 
2012
Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-07: Feinstein for Senate
Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-08: Repledge
Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-09: Points for Politics, LLC
Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-10: Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research, Inc.
Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-11: Free Speech
Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-12: Dunkin' Brands, Inc.
Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-13: Physicians Hospitals of America
Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-14: Shaun McCutcheon
Management and Administrative Matters

    Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such 
as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-
1040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shawn Woodhead Werth,
Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-9861 Filed 4-20-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
Exhibit 32.2





Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or


Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code





In connection with the Quarterly Report of OHA Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2019 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Cory E. Gilbert, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:May 14, 2019/s/ Cory E. GilbertCory E. GilbertChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
AMES TRUE TEMPER, INC.
 CERTIFICATIONS
 Exhibit 31.1
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Duane R. GreenlyDuane R. GreenlyPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
```

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a)

I, Michael Warren, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of BNS Holding, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

      Date: January 29, 2007

                                    /s/ Michael Warren
                                    -----------------------
                                    Michael Warren
                                    Chief Executive Officer
```