alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June 24, 2015

Mr. Tom Seiler

Seiler Instrument Inc.

3433 Tree Court Industrial Blvd. St. Louis, MO 63122

Dear Mr.Seiler:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 5, exemption request on behalf of Seiler Instrument Inc. into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-2130), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Airbee Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB/A for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Sundaresan Raja, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of the operations of the
      Company.




/s/
                  Sundaresan RajaSundaresan
                  RajaPrincipal
                  Executive Officer




February
      1, 2008
**
**Exhibit 15.3**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to the inclusion in the Shell Company Report on Form 20-F of noco-noco Inc. of our report datedApril 3, 2023 with respect to our audit of Prime Number Acquisition I Corp’s financial statements as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, for year ended December 31, 2022, and for the period from February 25, 2021 (inception) toDecember 31, 2021, which appears in the Registration Statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-271994). Our report contained an explanatory paragraph regardingsubstantial doubt about Prime Number Acquisition I Corp’s ability to continue as a going concern. 

We also consent to the reference to our Firm underthe heading “Statement by Experts” in such Shell Company Report. 

/s/ UHY LLP 

New York, New York 

September 1, 2023 
**
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of BOOMERS CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT, INC. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"), I, Lorena Jensen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Lorena Jensen

---------------------------

Date: January 13, 2006              Lorena Jensen

Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Donna Brandin, the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Donna Brandin


Donna Brandin


Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>   1




                 Hyperion Software Corporation and Subsidiaries
   Exhibit (11) - Statement Re: Computation of Earnings Per Share (Unaudited)
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED   SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                     DECEMBER 31,        DECEMBER 31,
                                                   1995      1994      1995      1994
                                                  -----------------   -----------------
<S>                                               <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>    
PRIMARY
   Weighted average number of common shares
     outstanding                                   16,532    15,456    16,379    15,394
   Weighted average number of common equivalent
     shares outstanding                             1,398     1,784     1,531     1,708
                                                  -----------------   -----------------
                                                   17,930    17,240    17,910    17,102
                                                  =================   =================
   Net income                                     $ 1,521   $ 2,011   $ 3,737   $ 3,882
                                                  =================   =================
   Per share amount                               $   .08   $   .12   $   .21   $   .23
                                                  =================   =================
FULLY DILUTED
   Weighted average number of common shares
     outstanding                                   16,532    15,456    16,379    15,394
   Weighted average number of common equivalent
     shares outstanding                             1,398     1,838     1,564     1,854
                                                  -----------------   -----------------
                                                   17,930    17,294    17,943    17,248
                                                  =================   =================
   Net income                                     $ 1,521   $ 2,011   $ 3,737   $ 3,882
                                                  =================   =================
   Per share amount                               $   .08   $   .12   $   .21   $   .23
                                                  =================   =================
</TABLE>
No. 03-13-00817-CV

________________________________________________________________ 

 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS, AUSTIN 

________________________________________________________________ 

SETON FAMILY OF HOSPITALS D/B/A SETON MEDICAL CENTER, 

Appellant, 

v. 

BEVERLY J. HAYWOOD, 

Appellee. 

________________________________________________________________ 

ON INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL FROM 

THE 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

________________________________________________________________ 

APPELLANT’S NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS 

________________________________________________________________ 

Comes Now, Appellant Seton Family of Hospitals d/b/a Seton 

Medical Center and presents this Notice of Change of Address. 

1. Appellant Seton Family of Hospitals d/b/a Seton Medical Center, 

and respectfully requests that this Court and Appellee take notice that 

the address for Appellant’s counsel in this matter has changed. 

Appellant respectfully requests that this Court, Appellee, and the Clerk 

ACCEPTED

03-13-00817-CV

4891756

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/15/2015 9:06:19 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/15/2015 9:06:19 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
2 

make a notation in their records that all further communication, notices 

and pleadings should be directed to: 

Emily J. Davenport 

Reed, Claymon, Meeker & Hargett, P.C. 

5608 Parkcrest Drive, Suite 200 

Austin, Texas 78731 

(512) 660-5960 telephone 

(512) 660-5979 facsimile 

edavenport@rcmhlaw.com 

 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 REED, CLAYMON, MEEKER & 

 HARGETT, P.C. 

 By /s/ Emily J. Davenport 

 Emily J. Davenport 

 State Bar No. 24012501 

 Robert L. Hargett 

 State Bar No. 08996550 

 Janice M. Byington 

 State Bar No. 24006938 

 5608 Parkcrest Drive, Suite 200 

 Austin, Texas 78731 

 (512) 660-5960 telephone 

 (512) 660-5979 facsimile 

 edavenport@rcmhlaw.com 

 rhargett@rcmhlaw.com 

 jbyington@rcmhlaw.com 

 

 ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT 

 SETON FAMILY OF HOSPITALS 

D/B/A SETON MEDICAL CENTER 
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 Pursuant to rule 9.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, I 

hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument 

has been filed electronically and delivered via electronically and via 

facsimile to the following counsel of record on this 15th day of April, 

2015: 

 

Robert C. Alden 

Byrd, Davis Furman & Alden, LLP 

707 West 34th St. 

Austin, Texas 78705 

 /s/ Emily J. Davenport 

 Emily J. Davenport
Updated June 17, 2010 

Formal Recommendation by the 

National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) 

to the National Organic Program (NOP)

Date: April 29, 2011

Subject: Sodium Silicate Sunset

Chair: Tracy Miedema

 

 

The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: 

Rulemaking Action X

Guidance Statement 

Other 

Statement of the Recommendation (Including Recount of Vote): 

To relist sodium silicate—for tree fruit and fiber processing, on § 205.601.

 

Rationale Supporting Recommendation (including consistency with 

OFPA and NOP): 

Public comment on the compatibility with chlorine materials.

NOSB Vote:

Moved: John Foster Second: Steve DeMuri

Yes: 13 No: 0 Abstain: 1 Absent: 0 Recusal: 0
National Organic Standards Board 

Crops Committee 

2012 Sunset Recommendation 

Sodium Silicate 

April 29, 2011 

List: §205.601 Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic crop production. 

(l) As floating agents in postharvest handling. 

(2) Sodium silicate—for tree fruit and fiber processing. 

Committee Summary 

The Crops Committee requested but did not receive a Technical Report (TR) on this material 

prior to its consideration and recommendation on sodium silicate. Without the benefit of the TR 

and given limited information on the use and essentiality of sodium silicate, as well as the 

availability of another 601-allowed floating agent for the same purpose, the committee voted 

unanimously against the continued listing of this chemical, pending receipt of the TR and 

further technical review. 

Prior to the Board meeting, the Crops Committee recommended against the continued listing 

of sodium silicate —allowed for tree fruit and fiber processing as a floating agent and 

postharvest handling. 

The Crops Committee considered public comment received after the recommendation was 

adopted and took into account the compatibility of chlorine materials and the incompatibility 

with chlorine of another 601 floating agent, lignin sulfonate. The committee voted unanimously 

for the continued listing of this material. 

Committee Recommendation 

The Crops Committee recommends the continued listing of sodium silicate —allowed for tree 

fruit and fiber processing as a floating agent and postharvest handling. The motion was to 

continue the listing of sodium silicate —allowed for tree fruit and fiber processing as a floating 

agent and postharvest handling. 

Committee Vote 

Motion: To relist sodium silicate—for tree fruit and fiber processing, on § 205.601. 

Motion: Tina Ellor Second: Steve DeMuri

Yes: 7 No: 0 Absent: 0 Abstain: 0 Recuse: 0
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     I, Sundaresan Raja, Chief Executive Officer of Airbee Wireless, Inc., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Airbee Wireless, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s first fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   /s/ Sundaresan Raja     Sundaresan Raja  Chief Executive Officer     September 20, 2005
<Page>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.23

                  ADDENDUM TO THE SERVICE AND EXPENSE AGREEMENT
                                      AMONG
                           ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,
                            THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION
                                       AND
                         CERTAIN INSURANCE SUBSIDIARIES

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPAY, an Illinois insurance company ("Allstate"), THE
ALLSTATE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and parent of Allstate ("Allcorp")
and certain insurance company subsidiaries of Allcorp ("Affiliates") entered
into a SERVICE AND EXPENSE AGREEMENT as of January 1, 1999 (the "Agreement"). A
copy of the Agreement is attached to this Addendum and incorporated by reference
herein. The Agreement provides that Allstate will provide certain services and
facilities to Allcorp and Affiliates as identified therein.

Pursuant to its status as an Affiliate as referenced above herein, Provident
National Assurance Company ("PNAC") has requested the provision of services and
facilities under the Agreement. In executing this Addendum, PNAC shall be bound
by all terms and conditions reflected in the Agreement. PNAC's status thereunder
shall not be inconsistent with the status of the original Affiliate parties to
the Agreement.

This Addendum shall become effective as of the date of its execution and
Allstate's acceptance thereof.

Provident National Assurance Company

By:
   -----------------------
        Michael J. Velotta
        Secretary

Date: April 2, 2001

Allstate Insurance Company acknowledges that the above listed entity has become
a party to the Service and Expense Agreement, subject to all of the terms and
conditions as if an original party thereto.

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY

By:
   ---------------------------------------
       Samuel H. Pilch
       Group Vice President and Controller

Date: April 2, 2001
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Form
S-8 Nos. 2-33676, 2-56821, 2-77219, 2-77575, 2-83637, 2-97935, 33-17831,
33-23601, 33-23603, 33-30927, 33-54496, 333-07733, 333-91367 and 333-66622)
pertaining to employee benefit plans of BNS Co. of our report dated February 13,
2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of BNS Co. included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

                                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Providence, Rhode Island
March 27, 2002
___________________ 1 Member airlines are: Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, Atlas Air, Delta Air Lines, Federal Express, Hawaiian Airlines, JetBlue Airways, Southwest Airlines, United Airlines, United Parcel Service, Co.
Associate member is: Air Canada October 3, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 400 7th Street SW, Plaza 401 Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption No. 5400 K , (Docket No. FAA

- 2001

- 10676)

Dear Sir or Madam:

In accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations, 14 CFR §11.81, Airlines for America 1 (A4A) on behalf of its member airlines and other similarly situated Part 121 certificate holders, petitions for an extension of Exemption No. 5400 K (Docket No. FAA

- 2001

- 10676). Th e current exemption (5400K) will expire on January 31, 201 6

.

Exemption No. 5400 K permits A4A member airlines and other similarly situated Part 121 air carriers to use a Phase II (Level C) simulator for pilot

- in

- command (PIC) training and checking in accordance with the requirements of Part 121, Appendix H, amended, provided certain conditions and limitations are met. Also, under the terms of the exemption, upgrade training and the certification check required by 14 CFR §61.157 can be accomplished in a Phase II

simulator.

The conditions and circ umstances, in regard to public interest and equivalent levels of safety, which warranted the original grant of this exemption, continue to exist. This exemption and its predecessors, Exemption No. 5400, have been in use for almost 20 years with no known

comprom ise of safety.

The renewal of t his exemption is not a controversial issue. A4A believes that there is just cause to waive the requirement of public notice of this petition. There is no substantial change to the exemption and the renewal of this exemption is not precedent setting, theref ore, A4A requests that publication in the Federal Register be waived as unnecessary.A summary of this petition is included (Attachment 1) as required by 14 CFR §11.81. If any

further information is required, please call me at 202

- 626

- 4285

Sincerely,

/S/

Jeffrey A. Miller Managing Director

– Flight Operations

Airlines for America 1301 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Suite 1100 Washington, DC 2000 4

Attachment 1: Summary of Petition

### Attachment 1:

October 3, 201 5

Docket No. FAA

- 2001

- 10676

Summary of A4 A Petition

Petitioner: Airlines for America (A4A)

Regul ation Affected: 14 CFR §61.157

Description of Relief Sought : Renew Exemption 5400K with no other changes to the existing terms except to extend its termination date. This allows Part 121 operators to use a Phase II (Level C) simulator for pilot in command (PIC) training and checking in accordance with the requirements of Part 121, appendix H, provided certain conditions and limitations are met.
```

[Federal Register: March 23, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 55)]
[Notices]               
[Page 13805-13806]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23mr10-114]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6925]

 
Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Race to the End of the Earth''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Race to the End of the Earth,'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the American Museum 
of Natural History, New York, NY, from on or about May 25, 2010, until 
on or about January 3, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice 
of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD,

[[Page 13806]]

Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

     Dated: March 16, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-6345 Filed 3-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```