alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
© 2021 DUN & BRADSTREET D&B D-U-N-S Asistencia para el programa de subvenciones PRS del USDA

Agosto de 2021

***Cualquier material en español que describa el Programa de Subvenciones para la Seguridad y Respuesta a la 

Pandemia del USDA se proporciona únicamente con fines educativos. Sólo los documentos en inglés son legalmente 

vinculantes.***

Guía de inicio rápido: documentos necesarios para una 

solicitud nueva de D-U-N-S

Información útil

El Departamento de Agricultura de los Estados Unidos (USDA) requiere que una entidad tenga un número D-U-N-S 

para poder presentar una solicitud para el Programa de Subvenciones de Seguridad y Respuesta a la Pandemia.

Es posible que muchas empresas ya tengan un número D-U-N-S y no lo sepan. Sin embargo, si no tiene un DUNS, lo 

puede solicitar uno fácilmente. Todas las solicitudes nuevas de número D-U-N-S requieren documentación de 

respaldo para su tramitación.

¿Qué documentos necesito para solicitar un nuevo número D-U-N-S?

Puede solicitar fácilmente un número DUNS nuevo grátis a través de nuestro breve formulario. El formulario requiere 

que ingrese la información básica de la empresa y que cargue electrónicamente dos (2) documentos que respalden la 

información empresarial que ha ingresado. Le recomendamos que reúna los documentos, en el formato correcto, antes 

de iniciar la solicitud. 

Los requisitos de los documentos son sencillos:

- Deben contener el nombre legal y la dirección física actual de la empresa. 

o RECORDATORIO: Si usted es un propietario único/individual, su nombre comercial legal es su 

nombre legal completo (es decir. Jane A. Doe) y la documentación debe contener su nombre legal 

completo.

- Formatos aceptables: .gif, .jpg, .jpeg, .png, .doc, .docx, .xls, .xlsx, .csv, .txt, .zip

- No incluya información personal como su licencia de conducir, el pasaporte, el número de seguro social, 

estados de cuenta bancarios, etc.

Ejemplos de documentos aceptados:

• Artículos de Incorporación (Certificado de Incorporación) de la Secretaría del Estado

• Recibo de tramitación de la Secretaría de Estado 

• Carta de confirmación del número de identificación del contribuyente (TIN)

• Carta de confirmación del número de identificación del empleador (EIN)

• Presentación del Certificado de Nombre Ficticio/DBA

• Contrato de arrendamiento

• Hipoteca

• Factura de teléfono o Internet

• Factura de servicios públicos (luz, agua, etc.)

• Seguro para propietarios o inquilinos

• Permiso de impuestos municipal o estatal

• Factura de una perona o contrato independiente (tercero)

• Prueba de seguro

Una vez que tenga su documentación, vuelva al Portal D-U-N-S para solicitantes de subvenciones PRS del USDA 

en https://www.dnb.com/PandemicResponse.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Lougene Baird, the Chief Operating Officer, Secretary and a director of HS3 Technologies, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of HS3 Technologies, Inc. for the nine months ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HS3 Technologies, Inc.

Dated February 14, 2006.

/s/ Lougene Baird                              

Lougene Baird 

Chief Operating Officer, Secretary and Director

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-10356

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

STACEY WYNN,

Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:96-CR-68-19

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Stacey Wynn, federal prisoner # 29140-077, appeals pro se from the

district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence

reduction based on the crack cocaine amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines.

Section 3582 allows a district court to reduce a term of imprisonment that was

“based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by” an

amendment to the Guidelines. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 27, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 08-10356 Document: 00511276513 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/27/2010
No. 08-10356

Due to the amount of crack cocaine involved, Wynn’s offense level was not

reduced by the crack cocaine amendment. Therefore, he was not eligible for a

sentence reduction under Section 3582.

Wynn argues that the sentencing court should have exercised its discretion

under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and imposed a “reasonable”

sentence below the guidelines range based on the sentencing factors of 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a). He asserts that his sentence was not reasonable because the district

court treated the Sentencing Guidelines as mandatory. Booker does not apply

to a Section 3582(c)(2) proceeding. Dillon v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 2683,

2691-94 (2010). Accordingly, a movant under Section 3582 is entitled at most to

the reduction allowed by the amended guidelines range. A sentencing court

lacks discretion to reduce the sentence any further than that allowed by the

amendment. United States v. Doublin, 572 F.3d 235, 238 (5th Cir.), cert denied,

130 S. Ct. 517 (2009). Because Wynn was not entitled to a sentence reduction

based on the crack cocaine amendment, no relief is available. See Id.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 08-10356 Document: 00511276513 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/27/2010
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23709-23710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9561]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings <greek-i>3

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4157-001.
    Applicants: Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
    Description: SRW IOA Compliance Filing to be effective 9/27/2011.
    Filed Date: 4/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120412-5054.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/3/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1347-001.
    Applicants: Carolina Power & Light Company.
    Description: Amendment to Rate Schedule No. 190 of Carolina Power 
and Light Company to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 4/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120412-5129.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/19/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1524-000.
    Applicants: Kleantricity, Inc.
    Description: Kleantricity MBRA Application to be effective 7/1/
2012.
    Filed Date: 4/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120412-5081.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/3/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1525-000.
    Applicants: NRG Solar Alpine LLC.

[[Page 23710]]

    Description: Application for Market-Based Rate Authority to be 
effective 6/11/2012.
    Filed Date: 4/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120412-5124.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/3/12.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: April 12, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9561 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### In the Matter of Elias Kalimian, as Trustee, Appellant, v New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal et al., Respondents.

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered on March 9, 1990, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Karla Moskowitz, J., without costs. No opinion. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas EmissionsMeeting Documentation: IntelDateStaff Contact Information(Name, email, phone #)Name of Organization (Attachlist of all attendees names andemails if possible)Summary of Discussion(e.g.,applicability, reporting requirements, etc.)WrittenCommentsProvided?Did they alsosubmit toDocket?Date sentto EPACCDApril 27, 2010Chandler, AZKirsten Cappel(202) 343-9556cappel.kirsten@epa.govTim Higgs, Inteltim.g.higgs@intel.comSean Aldrich, IntelIntel provided general informationon their manufacturing operations.Intel identified questions andconcerns with the proposed rule,Electronics Manufacturing, subpart I(see Intel public comments in thedocket).Meeting included a tour of thefacility.Intel did submitpubliccomments to thedocket.
Swanson, Brian (OST) From: Devany, Dennis (OST) Sent: Sunday, February 28,201011 :35 AM To: Swanson, Brian (OST) Subject: FW: Plattsburgh EAS

From: John [mailto:johnff@charter.net] Sent: Sun 2/28/2010 10:18 AM To: Devany, Dennis (OST) Subject: Plattsburgh EAS Sir: I urge you to not acceptthe recommendation ofthe local legislature to change carriers from Cape Air to Colgan. Cape Air has reliably and economically offered frequent service. This is contrarytowhat Colgan has even stated itwill offer.
. There is littleto any redeemable value tothis recommended change and itworld neither meet local market needs. ·Thankyou. John F. Falcetta
. Morrisonville, NY

1
Exhibit
31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Tony D. Whitaker, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4 The registrants other certifying
officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change
in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying
officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.

|Date: February 14, 2008 | /s/Tony D. Whitaker  ****                               | 
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                        | Tony D. Whitaker                                       
|                        | Chairman of the Board and Chief
      Executive Officer

---
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 52 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require 

that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine justices. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2019 

Mr. GREEN of Tennessee submitted the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to require that the Supreme Court of the United 

States be composed of nine justices. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), 

4 That the following article is proposed as an amend5 ment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall 

6 be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Con7 stitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths 

8 of the several States within seven years after the date of 

9 its submission for ratification: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 52 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The Supreme Court of the United 

3 States shall be composed of nine justices, though one or 

4 more of these nine offices may be vacant until filled. 

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. If the size of the Supreme Court has 

6 been increased to more than nine justices before this 

7 amendment is ratified, upon the ratification of this 

8 amendment, those additional offices are void. 

9 ‘‘SECTION 3. Congress shall have the power to en10 force this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
TONY M. HAYWARD,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-1145

Opinion filed April 14, 2015.

Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Tony M. Hayward, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition seeking belated appeal is denied on the merits.

ROBERTS, SWANSON, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund XI, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dean L. Cash, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 13, 2009



|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Dean L. Cash                                                                       
|Dean L. Cash                                                                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 24 - 0024

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SH ANE WAYNE STANLEY ,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ The record was filed for purposes of this appeal on February 1 4 , 2024 . Nothing further has been filed, and the opening brief is now overdue. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Appellant shall prepare, file , and serve the opening brief on appeal no later than May 2 , 2024 . Failure to file the brief within that time will result in dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all parties .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 4 2024

04/04/2024
Case Number: DA 24-0024
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43172

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

ALEJANDRO DESIDERIO

- OCAMPO ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 733

Filed: November 30, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Patrick H. Owen , District Judge.

Ju dgment of conviction and unified sentence of fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years, for lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth Ann Allred , Deputy Appellat e Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
Alejandro Desiderio

- Ocampo pled guilty to lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen

. Idaho Code § 18

- 1508 . The district court sentenced Desiderio

- Ocampo to a unified term of

fifteen years with five years determinate

. Desider io

- Ocampo appeals asserting that the district

court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence

. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 1 14, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Desiderio

- Ocamp o ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
THE VISUAL AIDS ON THE FOLLOWING 

PAGES ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND 

NOT INTENDED FOR OFFICIAL USE. 

TO PURCHASE OFFICIAL VISUAL AIDS PLEASE CONTACT

THE SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION’S

EQUIPMENT AND FORMS DEPOT

USDA, AMS, SCP, SCI 

831 MITTEN ROAD, ROOM 200 

BURLINGAME, CA 94010 

PHONE: 650-552-9073 

FAX: 650-552-9147 

EQUIPMENT CATALOG
EGGPLANT 

U.S. No. 1, Lower Limit U.S. No. 1, Lower Limit U

NOT DAMAGE by scarring NOT DAMAGE by scarring DAMAG

March 1991 
EGGPLANT 

U.S. No. 1 – LOWER LIMIT 

Maximum extent to which appearance may be affected by green color under definition of 

Fairly Well Colored. 

Eggplant, C-2 

Green color 

July 1990 (Previously November 1953) 
Eggplant - Open Spaces (Quality) 

Materially Detracting Seriously Detracting 

Minimum amount needed to Minimum amount needed to 

score as damage. score as serious damage. 

To determine, cut the eggplant crosswise in the middle. 

Score if either side is materially or seriously affecting the appearance. 

When discoloration or mold is present, score as a condition defect. 

For Example: "Open spaces followed by brown discoloration." 

USDA Eggplant CP-1, Dec. 2019
Exhibit 23

The Board of Directors
Marketing Services Group, Inc.



     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No.  333-30969 on Form S-3 and No. 333-30839 on Form S-8) of Marketing Services
Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries, of our report dated September 9, 1998, relating to
the consolidated balance sheet of Marketing Services Group, Inc. as of June 30,
1998 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity
and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended June 30, 1998.


                                            /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



New York, NY
September 25, 1998
UP, %£7-cn

aW*mW RECEIVEDIN

0,(0 [ M\A y^°\ M/ COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

IWO.fWL^H (£>(T| M x32015

A^iA^fr^l5' AbelAoosla,Clerk

"tyu-W ^fefrM"tW. ha4w> mL wM} nhl t*- tW

"Irv^Ti/iJki
**
**Exhibit 32.4**

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Crane Company (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Richard A. Maue, Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify to the best of my knowledge that:

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant. 

This Certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form10-K and shall not be treated as having been filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

By /s/ Richard A. Maue
Richard A. MaueExecutive Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)March 30, 2023**