alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23666]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9666]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: Vol. 77, No. 72, 
Friday, April 13, 2012, page 22290.

Announced Time and Date of Meeting: Wednesday, April 18, 2012, 10 a.m.- 
11 a.m.

Meeting Canceled: For a recorded message containing the latest agenda 
information, call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of 
the Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-
7923.

    Dated: April 18, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9666 Filed 4-18-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002




I, David
Lichtenstein, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the “Company”)
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:





(1) The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,
2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m); and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ David
      Lichtenstein


David
      Lichtenstein


Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


May
      17, 2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

AJATHA WERTS-KNOTTS, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL 

BOARD (PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL 

DISTRICT AND SEDGWICK CLAIMS 

MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.), 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 151 EM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 21st day of January, 2016, the Petition for Leave to File Petition 

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED. 

Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this 

matter.
Products ISO Standards By TC TC 31 Tyres, rims and valves 

# ISO 28580:2009 Passenger car, truck and bus tyres -- Methods of meas uring rolling resistance -- Single point test and correlation of measurement results Media and price

General information Number of Pages: 26

Abstract

ISO 28580:2009 specifies methods for measuring rolling resistance, under controlled laboratory conditions, for new pneumatic tyres designed primarily for use on passenger ca rs, trucks and buses. Tyres intended for temporary use only are not included in ISO 28580:2009. ISO 28580:2009 includes a method for correlating measurement results to allow inter-laboratory comparisons. Measurement of tyres using this method enables comparis ons to be made between the rolling resistance of new test tyres when they are free-rolling straight ahead, in a position perpendicular to the drum outer surface, and in steady-state conditions. In measuring tyre rolling resistance, it is necessary to measure small forces in the presence of much larger forces. It is, therefore, essential that equipment and in strumentation of appropriate accuracy be used. Language Format Add to basket English PDF (271 kB) CHF 112,00 English Paper CHF 112,00 French PDF (282 kB) CHF 112,00 French Paper CHF 112,00

Edition: 1 (Monolingual) ICS: 83.160.01 Status: Published Stage: 60.60 (2009-06-24) TC/SC: TC 31 

## Page 1 of 2 ISO 28580:2009 - Passenger car, tr uck and bus tyres -- Methods of measuring rolling resi
...

9/20/2010 htt p ://www.iso.or g /iso/catalo g ue

_ detail.htm?csnumber=44770
1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE

Twelfth Court of Appeals

Inez Manigault

Twelfth Court of Appeals

Appellant

vs.

Jane Thorn-Henderson

Appellee

Case No: 12-14-00156-CV

Trial C

C122852

FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS

12th Court of Appeals District

TEXAS

CATHY S. LUSK, C\

APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE INITIAL

BRIEF

The Appellant, Inez. Manigault, moves this court to

extend the time for filing the Initial Brief, and as grounds

therefore, states:

1. Recently received the Reporter's Record. Due to

confusion to quoted cost. The initial date of extension date

granted by the court to pay for the Reporter's Record was

obeyed on February 27, 2015, $697.50, was paid. However, a

different amount of $80.00 dollars was added to the amount

2. The issues in this case are complex and involve

Constitutionality of out of-state statue unfamiliar to the

pro se litigant

3. Additional time is necessary to prepare a Brief7.

4. The undersigned, requests additional time in which

to file the Initial Brief, so that the Initial Brief shall

be due on or before May 30, 2015.

5. There will be no prejudice to Appellee in granting

this request for extension of time to file the Initial

Brief. Appellee was contacted on March 26, 2015.

6. This Motion is made in good faith, and not merely
i

for purpose of delay.

Appellant contacted opposing attorney. Please find

enclosed e-mail from opposing attorney.. No further, contact

or information received from attorney.

I HEREBY CERTIFFY, that a true and correct copy of the

foregoing has been furnished via U. S. Mail to Esquire,

lult (Pro

P. (3. Box 81922

Atlanta, Georgia 303

678) 547-3914

Cc: Adam B. Allen

White Shaver, PC

205 West Locust Street

Tyler, Texas 75702
I

. *7/20J5 Gmail- briefextension

Inez Manigault <inezmanigauit@grnail.com>

brief extension

2 messages

Inez Manigault <inezmanigau!t@gmail.com> Fri, Mar27, 2015 at 8:34 PM

To: AAIfen@whiteshaverfaw.com

Dear Attorney Allen:

f am writing to ask your position on another extension to file the original brief. As you are aware. Ms. Parks,

recently filed the recorder's record with the Courts. The amount requested in February was paid. Adifferent

amount was quoted, after this amount was paid.

Iwould need some timeto review the record, and prepare my brief. The request would ask the court, to extend

through May 15, 2015.

Thank you,

s/s Inez Manigault

Adam Allen <AAilen@whiteshaverlaw.com> Fri, Mar 27, 20i5 at 9:14 PM

To: Inez Manigault <inezmanigault@gmail.cpm>

Ms. Manigault,

I'll need to confer with my client before I agree to another extension. Irecognize your situation, and the same

will be communicated, but I cannot agree to anotherextension without prior authorization.

Thank you,

Adam Allen

Sent from my iPad

[Quoted text hiddenj

tttffctfmaiLga^e.cOT/mailMC^ m
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 392ND DISTRICT COURT OF HENDERSON COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 19th 

day of April, 2017, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

GARY RAMSEY AND SANDRA RAMSEY, Appellant

NO. 12-16-00155-CV; Trial Court No. 2013B-0254

Opinion by Brian Hoyle, Justice.

CATERPILLAR INC., Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the oral arguments, appellate record and briefs filed 

herein, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the 

judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the court 

below be in all things affirmed, and that this decision be certified to the court below for 

observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 1

st day of December, 2017.

PAM ESTES, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J OR GE AG UI L AR - VA L L E J O, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 09- 10518 D . C . N o . 5 : 0 8 -cr-0 0 8 7 0 -JW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J am e s W ar e , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r19, 2010 ** B efo re: O ’ S C A N N L A IN , T A L L M A N , an dB E A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J or ge A gui l ar - V a l l e

j o appe a l s f

r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s de ni a l of hi s m ot i on t o di s m i s s the i ndi c tm e nt . W e have j ur i s di c t i on pur s uantt o 28 U . S . C . § 1291, and w e d i sm i ss. 

# FI LED OC T 28 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 10518 2 A g u ilar - V a lle

jo c o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt e rr e dw h e n it d e n ie dh is m ot i on t o d i sm i ss the i nd i ctm ent . W hen A gu i l ar -V al l ej o ent er ed an un cond i t i on al g u iltyp le a , h o w e v e r , h e w a iv e dth e r ig h t to ap p e a l th e d e n ia l o f h is m o tio n to d is m is s . Se e T

ol le t t v . H e nde rs on , 411 U . S . 258, 267 ( 1973) . W e the r e f or e do not a d d r e s s th e m e r its o f

A g u ilar - V a lle

jo ’s m o tio n to d is m is s . See U ni ted States v. L o p ez -A rm e n ta , 4 0 0 F .3 d1 1 7 3 , 1 1 7 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . D I SM I SSED .
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

ERIKA ROXANNE GROVES

,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2 63 6 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 109 DB 201 9

Attorney Registration No. 206668

( Lawrence County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23 rd d ay of August , 201 9 , upon co nsideration of the

Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board

, Erika Roxanne Groves is placed on

temporary suspension until further action by this Court. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(5). Sh e

shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.

Respondent’s rights to petition for dissolution or amendment of this Order and to

request accelerated disposition of charges underlying this order are specifically

preserved. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(4) and (f)(6).

The Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline with the meaning of

Pa.R.D.E. 402, pertaining to confidentiality.
<PAGE>   1

                          Hyperion Software Corporation
   Exhibit (11) - Statement Re: Computation of Earnings Per Share (Unaudited)
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                        THREE MONTHS ENDED 
                                                           SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                         1997        1996
                                                       -------------------- 
<S>                                                     <C>          <C>    

PRIMARY
   Weighted average number of common
      shares outstanding                                18,415       17,060 
                                                                            
   Weighted average number of common                                        
      equivalent shares outstanding                        942          753 
                                                       -------------------- 
                                                        19,357       17,813 
                                                       ==================== 

   Net income                                          $ 3,512      $ 2,041 
                                                       ==================== 
                                                                            
   Per share amount                                    $   .18      $   .11 
                                                       ==================== 
                                                                            
FULLY DILUTED                                                               
   Weighted average number of common                                        
      shares outstanding                                18,415       17,060 
                                                                            
   Weighted average number of common                                        
      equivalent shares outstanding                      1,052          953 
                                                       -------------------- 
                                                        19,467       18,013 
                                                       ==================== 
                                                                            
   Net income                                          $ 3,512      $ 2,041 
                                                       ==================== 
                                                                            
   Per share amount                                    $   .18      $   .11 
                                                       ==================== 
                                                       
</TABLE>