alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Federal Grain Inspection Service

Grain Inspection Advisory Committee (GIAC) Members

February 27, 2024

Ms. Kia Adams-Mikesh (Secretary)

Owner/Vice President

North Dakota Grain Inspection Service, Inc.

Walcott, ND

Term Ends: January 2026

Ms. Barbara Grove (Chair)

Quality Systems Manager

Central Valley Ag

York, NE

Term Ends: March 2025

Mr. Charles Bird

Sr. Director Product Management

Neogen Corporation

Lansing, MI

Term Ends: March 2025

Mr. Rashad Hart

General Superintendent of Plant Operations

Cargill, Inc.

Westwego, LA

Term Ends: March 2027

Dr. Carlos Campabadal

Instructor

Kansas State University

Manhattan, KS

Term Ends: March 2027

Mr. Mark Heil

General Manager

Prairie Central Cooperative, Inc.

Chenoa, IL

Term Ends: January 2026

Ms. Erin Casey-Campbell

Program Manager

Missouri Department of Agriculture

Jefferson City, MO

Term Ends: March 2027

Dr. Charles Hurburgh

Professor

Iowa State University

Ames, IA

Term Ends: January 2026

Mr. Christopher Frederking (Vice Chair)

General Manager

Zen-Noh Grain Corporation

Convent, LA 

Term Ends: March 2025

Ms. Tracy Logan

Director of Export Documentation

United Grain Corporation

Vancouver, WA

Term Ends: March 2027

Mr. Philip Garcia

Grain Inspection Program Manager 

Washington State Department of Agriculture

Olympia, WA

Term Ends: March 2025

Mr. John Morgan

Vice President

Supreme Rice, LLC

Crowley, LA

Term Ends: March 2025
2

Federal Grain Inspection Service

Grain Inspection Advisory Committee (GIAC) Members

February 27, 2024

Ms. Erica Olson

Market Development & Research Manager

North Dakota Wheat Commission

West Fargo, ND

Term Ends: March 2027

Dr. Kurt Rosentrater

Professor

Iowa State University

Ames, IA

Term Ends: March 2025

Ms. Shayleen Rambur

Vice President

JD Heiskell & Company

Tulare, CA

Term Ends: January 2026
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9573]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive Patent License; Aurora 
Technologies, LLC

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent 
to grant to Aurora Technologies, LLC a revocable, nonassignable, 
exclusive license to practice in the United States, the Government-
owned inventions described in Navy Case 101713 entitled Laser Treated 
Heat Transfer Surface.//Navy Case 101445 entitled Surface Enhancement 
Via Applied Laser Energy.

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file 
written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later 
than May 7, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with the Naval Surface 
Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code OOL, Bldg. 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, 
IN 47522-5001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Christopher Monsey, Naval Surface 
Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code OOL, Bldg 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 
47522-5001, telephone 812-854-4100.

    Authority:  35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.

J.M. Beal,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-9573 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 87 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 87

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for the reappointment of Michael M. Lynton as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the

              

 vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the 
class other than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the 
expiration of the term of Michael M. Lynton of California is filled by 
the reappointment of the incumbent. The reappointment is for a term of 
6 years, beginning on the later of September 29, 2020, or the date of 
the enactment of this joint resolution.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 87

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

   Providing for the reappointment of Michael M. Lynton as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.
```
Exhibit 23.1



                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement of Boston Edison Company on Form S-3 (File No. 33-57840) of our
report dated January 28, 1999 on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Boston Edison Company as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998, which report
is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



                                 By:  /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                      ----------------------------------
                                          PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 1999
Exhibit 4.41

April 15, 2002

K. Tucker Anderson
61 Above All Road
Warren, CT 06754

Dear Mr. Andersen:

This letter serves as an agreement between Milestone Scientific and K. Tucker
Andersen whereby Mr. Andersen provides Milestone with a $200,000 line of credit
effective immediately, payable in cash through January 2, 2003. Interest will be
computed at 6% and the specifics of the warrant agreement attached to this loan
will be determined at a later date.

Sincerely,


Thomas M. Stuckey
VP and CFO

_________________________________
K. Tucker Andersen
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, James S. Phalen, as Chief Executive Officer of the American Bar Association Members/ State Street Collective Trust,certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of the American Bar Association Members/ State Street Collective Trust; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:August 6, 2004
FIRST COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals. 

 

Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court

reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter’s record be prepared or 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared?

 Y N

(4) Please select from the following options:

 A. The appellant has paid for the record.

 B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record

 C. The appellant is appealing as indigent.

 D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

 record and is not appealing as indigent.

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment)

I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers 

_______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record.

Additional Comments: ___________________________________________

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number:

_______________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/23/2015 7:47:49 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Airbee Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Sundaresan Raja, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of the operations of the
      Company.




/s/ Sundaresan
              RajaSundaresan
                Raja
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              
              September
                22, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

                             Financial Data Schedule
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF MARKETING  SERVICES GROUP, INC. AS OF AND
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,  2000  INCLUDED  IN THIS  REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS </LEGEND>

<CURRENCY>                             U.S. Dollars

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Jun-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          Jul-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            Jun-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1
<CASH>                                    9,903,799
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                            44,446,691
<ALLOWANCES>                             (2,287,867)
<INVENTORY>                               4,574,046
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         61,238,711
<PP&E>                                   21,684,931
<DEPRECIATION>                           (2,994,453)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          245,184,115
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    60,809,034
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                              29,417,279
<COMMON>                                    304,425
<OTHER-SE>                               97,716,495
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            245,184,115
<SALES>                                 128,606,882
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        128,606,882
<CGS>                                    77,906,758
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            77,906,758
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         61,992,616
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        2,355,848
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (40,864,540)
<INCOME-TAX>                                265,683
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (41,130,223)
<DISCONTINUED>                          (34,542,980)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                            (75,673,203)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (2.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (2.85)




</TABLE>
No. 12-14-00335-CR

DONNIE CARR § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

 Appellant §

§

vs. § 12TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee

§

§ AT TYLER, TEXAS

APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR ACCEPTANCE OF LATE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Now comes Austin Reeve Jackson, counsel for Appellant in the above entitled and 

numbered cause, and makes this Motion, and for good cause shows the following:

I.

Appellant’s brief in this matter was due on 23 March 2015. No prior extensions 

have been requested.

II.

This case presented a potential issue that was unique to counsel and, as a result, 

required additional time to research. 

Additionally, while working on this case counsel has also been working on 

approximately 50 open appellate cases in this and other courts to which he has been 

appointed by Smith County. This has included investigating motions for new trials 

(looking for and talking with potential witnesses, jail and office visits with new appellate 

appointments, trial court appearances for the same), requests for and reviews of reporter’s 

and clerk’s records, research, briefing, review of opinions, investigation of potential PDR 

issues, etc. While not all of these seventy or so cases have required significant attention 

ACCEPTED

12-14-00335-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

4/9/2015 11:47:02 AM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 4/9/2015 11:47:02 AM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
from counsel during this time, many of them have which ahs resulted form counsel 

having been able to devote the full attention necessary to this case prior to today’s date. 

Because of this, counsel was delayed in completing his brief in this matter.

II.

No prior extensions have been requested and is respectfully prayed that the in the 

interest of justice, the Court grant this motion.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, undersigned counsel respectfully 

prays that, in accordance with the applicable law, the Court grant this Motion and accept

the brief filed in today in this matter.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Austin Reeve Jackson

Texas Bar No. 24046139

112 East Line, Suite 310

Tyler, TX 75702

Telephone: (903) 595-6070

Facsimile: (866) 387-0152

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document 

was served on counsel for the State by efile concurrently with its filing. 

/s/Austin Reeve Jackson
#### Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., Respondent, v Catalina Meyer, Appellant.

—Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Burton S. Sherman, J.), entered October 12, 1990, granting petitioner’s application to confirm an arbitration award, denying respondent’s cross-motion to vacate the same, because of arbitrator misconduct and entering judgment in favor of petitioner against respondent unanimously affirmed, with costs.

This arbitration proceeding arises out of petitioner’s claim that respondent, upon termination of employment, closed out various accounts maintained by petitioner to which credits erroneously had been made in respondent’s favor. Petitioner sought to recover money damages in the amount of $499,500.

Recognizing that it rests within the sound discretion of an *497arbitrator to grant or refuse an adjournment, we agree that respondent failed to demonstrate misconduct on the part of the arbitrators in denying further adjournments, and therefore, vacatur of the arbitration award, pursuant to CPLR 7511 (b) (1) is not warranted *(see, Matter of Herskovitz v Kaye Assocs.,*170 AD2d 272).

Respondent’s repeated requests for adjournments, over the course of one year, and numerous substitutions of counsel support the view that the arbitrators committed no abuse of discretion in denying the request for a further adjournment *(Harwyn Luggage v Henry Rosenfeld, Inc.,*90 AD2d 747, *affd*58 NY2d 1063). Furthermore, respondent failed to demonstrate a genuine medical emergency *(cf., International Components Corp. v Klaiber,*59 AD2d *853).*The record establishes that respondent had undergone surgery a few years earlier and was recuperating. To the extent her recuperation did not preclude other activities in which she engaged during the year preceding the arbitration hearing, it cannot be said that she had suffered a "genuine” medical emergency which required an adjournment *(supra; Matter of Omega Contr. v Maropakis Contr.,*160 AD2d 942).

Last, we note that the same court (Fingerhood, J.), on a prior motion denied respondent’s motion to stay arbitration on the ground that she did not agree to arbitration. Thus, we reject, based upon doctrines of law of the case, and *res judicata,*the vague and non-specific argument that her signature upon the agreement containing the arbitration clause was forged. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.
----

|  | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: March 16, 2023 | By:    | /s/ Gerard Waldt        |
|---------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                      |   | Gerard Waldt            |
|                      |   | Chief Financial Officer |

----
GROUPGAP for Growers

Many small and mid-sized farmers find it 

difficult to pay for and get the food safety 

certification they need to access larger 

markets. The USDA GroupGAP Certification 

Program makes it easier for growers of all 

sizes and grower groups to receive USDA Good 

Agricultural Practices (GAP) certification.

What is GroupGAP? 

GroupGAP is a robust certification program that 

helps producers and grower groups, such as 

cooperatives and food hubs, comply with 

retailers’ requirements for on-farm food safety 

certification. Under this program, any group of 

producers or supply chain partners who come 

together to implement a shared food safety 

program is considered a group.

How does GroupGAP work?

In GroupGAP, a collection of independent 

farms organize together to create a food safety 

system. Participants identify the food safety 

standard best suited to the needs of their 

buyers. They also work together to develop 

safety practices and collect required 

documentation, provide their own internal 

auditing services, and participate in an 

external audit by the USDA Specialty Crops 

Inspection Division.

Why should I work as part of a group?

Working as a group allows you to:

 Share resources and certification costs, 

 Operate under a single, central quality 

management system,

 Demonstrate a recognized commitment to 

food safety, 

 Develop a pool of diverse product offerings, 

and 

 Undergo an audit together to obtain 

GroupGAP certification.

How will GroupGAP certification benefit 

me?

GroupGAP certification will allow you to:

 Get USDA GAP-certified,

 Meet buyers’ food safety certification 

requirements,

 Demonstrate your adherence to Food 

Safety Modernization Act requirements, and 

 Open doors to new, larger, more stable, 

and more profitable markets.

How do I learn more about GroupGAP?

Call: 202.720.5021

Web: www.ams.usda.gov/services/

auditing/groupgap 

Email: GroupGAP@ams.usda.gov

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bar Association
Members/State Street Collective Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James S. Phalen, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                                 /s/ James S. Phalen
                                                ----------------------
                                                James S. Phalen
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                May 15, 2003