alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**EXHIBIT        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or                15 (d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/                Nancy J. McGurk     |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Nancy                J. McGurk         |
|   | Title: | Chief                Financial Officer |
|   | Date:  | June              15, 2005             |

----
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, Peter J. Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as applicable, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc.




/s/ Peter J. AndersonName:  Peter J. AndersonTitle:    Chief Financial OfficerDate:    August 10, 2009
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF KPMG LLP

Independent Auditors' Consent

The
Board of Directors
Tom Brown, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements Nos. 33-42991, 33-60191, 33-60842, 333-13157, 333-30069, 333-42011, 333-56577, 333-69353, 333-89031,
333-89033, 333-31426, 333-51320, 333-57814 and 333-74268 on Form S-8 of Tom Brown, Inc. of our report dated February 20, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Tom
Brown, Inc. as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the
December 31, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K of Tom Brown, Inc.

KPMG
LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 18, 2003



QuickLinks
U. S. Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF COTTON

FOR RELEASE AT 4:00 P.M. CT November 26, 2019

USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of Cotton. The cotton bales were sold under 

Invitation 2020U0006 dated November 25, 2019.

Invitation 2020U0006

Catalog Lot 

No. Catalog Location Purchaser Pounds Sold 

Price Sold 

(per Pound) CCC Revenue 

12 LUBBOCK, TX ACG Cotton Marketing LLC 516 0.2622 $ 135.30 

28 PLAINVIEW, TX MemTex Cotton Marketing, 

LLC. 4,007 0.43 $ 1,723.01 

31 PLAINVIEW, TX MemTex Cotton Marketing, 

LLC. 2,529 0.43 $ 1,087.47 

32 PLAINVIEW, TX ACG Cotton Marketing LLC 7,886 0.2622 $ 2,067.71 

41 SWEETWATER, TX MemTex Cotton Marketing, 

LLC. 983 0.35 $ 344.05 

15,921 $ 5,357.53
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Airbee Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
        Sundaresan Raja, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of the operations of the
        Company.


|/s/
            Sundaresan Raja
|-------------------------------
|Sundaresan Raja                
|Chief Executive Officer        
|                               
|August
            14, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

I, James A. Konrath, Chief Executive Officer of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust (the
Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Dated: May 9, 2006



By:

/S/  JAMES A. KONRATHJames A. KonrathChief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust and will be retained by Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bar Association
Members/State Street Collective Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James S. Phalen, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                                     /s/ James S. Phalen
                                                     --------------------------
                                                     James S. Phalen
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     May 10, 2005
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Citation 2002 Investment LLC and 

Endeavor Energy Resources L.P.,

 

 Appellants,

v.

Occidental Permian, LTD., Occidental 

Petroleum Corporation, Oxy USA, Oxy 

USA WTP LP, and Rodeo Midland Basin, 

LLC,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00087-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2017-DCV0027)

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is a petition for permissive appeal filed by Citation 2002 

Investment LLC and Endeavor Energy Resources L.P. See TEX.R.APP.P. 28.3. The petition is 

GRANTED. Pursuant to Rule 28.3(k), a notice of appeal is deemed to have been filed by 

Citation 2002 Investment LLC and Endeavor Energy Resources L.P., on the date of this order 

and the appeal will be governed by the rules applicable to accelerated appeals. Citation 2002 

Investment LLC and Endeavor Energy Resources L.P. is directed to take all necessary steps to 

cause the appellate record to be filed. See TEX.R.APP.P. 34.5, 34.6. The clerk’s record and the 

reporter’s record, if any, are due to be filed no later than March 11, 2021. The Clerk of the Court 

shall file a copy of this order with the trial court clerk. See TEX.R.APP.P. 28.3(k). 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1

st day of March, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS FILED IN

OF THE STATE OF TEXAS C0URT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

NO- APR 14 2015

AbelAcosta Clerk JONATHAN GLEN JOHNSON ' °,erK

Appellant,

RECEIVED IN On Appeal from the

V. COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 263rd District Court of

APR 13 2015 ^a7srCoun^' Te*as' ,_7nor. Trial Cause Numbers 1377006 &

THE STATE OF TEXAS 1377007

AWIAooata,Clerk

PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

JONATHAN GLEN JOHNSON, Petitioner in the above cause number,

would respectfully request the Court to grant his motion to extend the time to file his

petition for discretionary review. In support of said motion, Appellant would show

unto the Court the following:

I.

This appeal lies from Appellant's convictions in The State of Texas v. Jonathan

Glen Johnson, Cause Numbers 1377006 and 1377007 in the 263rd District Criminal

Court of Harris County, Texas. Mr. Johnson was charged in two separate

indictments with aggravated robbery. On November 7, 2013, he pled guilty, without

the benefit of a plea bargain, to both charges. On January 30, 2014, a sentencing
V

hearing was held and at the conclusion of the hearing the court sentenced Mr.

Johnson to fifteen (15) years confinement on both counts with the two sentences

running concurrendy. Notice of Appeal was timely filed on February 18, 2014. A

motion for new trial was filed on March 3, 2014, but overruled by operation of law

without a hearing on April 15, 2014.

II.

Appellant is requesting an extension of time in order to fully evaluate the issues

to be raised in the PDR. An extension of time is necessary so that the petition for

discretionary review can be timely filed. This motion is not made for the purpose of

delay.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that this

Honorable Court will grant this requested extension of time to file the Appellant's

Petition for Discretionary Review in the above cause for ninety days and extend the

time for filing the petition untilJuly 8, 2015.
Respectfully submitted,

Mr( Jonathan Johnson

TDCJ No. 01943739

James V. Allred unit

2101 FM 369 North

Iowa Park, Texas 76367

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing instrument was this day served

on counsel for the State by mailing same to the following parties on this the 21day of

/Wa , 201^:

Mr. Eric Kugler

Harris County District Attorney's Office

Appellate Division

1201 Franklin, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002

State Prosecuting Attorney

P.O. Box 12405

Austin, Texas 78711

, (^_^/CyVU~&*>—

Jonathan Glen Johnson, PRO SE
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-56 Specification

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 July 23, 2019

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 1 of 2 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Treuth Reserve Angus Beef Program

G-56 Specification

1 REQUIREMENTS

Beef carcasses certified under this specification shall meet the following requirements: 

a. Phenotypic or genotypic requirements of the American Angus Association’s (AAA) Live

Animal Specification;

b. Classed as Steer or Heifer carcasses only1;

c. U.S. Prime or Choice and have a minimum marbling score of Small 01; 

d. Less than 30 months of age with lean color, texture, and firmness, meeting the requirements for

A maturity in the U.S. grade it qualifies for1;

e. Medium or fine marbling texture1, 2

; 

f. Moderately thick or thicker muscling and tend to be at least moderately wide and thick in

relation to their length3;

g. No hump exceeding 2 inches in height 4; 

h. Practically free (not detracting from visual quality) of capillary rupture in the ribeye muscle;

and

i. Free of “dark cutting” characteristics.

2 CERTIFICATION

Carcasses to be examined for compliance with this specification shall be clearly identified and 

presented to an AMS grader for certification. Certification procedures for identification, the removal 

of preliminary identification marks (or other methods of control) from non-qualifying carcasses, and 

control of certified carcasses shall be in accordance with established Quality Assessment Division 

(QAD) procedures. 

3 LABELING

Labeling of products derived from certified carcasses must follow Food Safety and Inspection Service 

regulations and policy guidelines and QAD procedures. 

1 Determined in accordance with the “Official United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef.” 2 Evaluated using the USDA-AMS-LS-SB-02 Marbling Texture card (included in the Official USDA Marbling Photographs.) 3 Muscle thickness is evaluated by averaging the thickness of the various parts, considering not only the proportion of each part of the 

carcass but also the general value of each part. Superior muscle thickness implies a high proportion of meat to bone and a high 

proportion of the weight of the carcass in the more valuable parts.

4 Measured from a line formed by the extension of the top line (including the fat) and measuring the lean muscle (excluding the fat) 

perpendicular to that line in the center of the hump.
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-56 Specification 

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 July 23, 2019

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 2 of 2 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

4 FEES

The costs of all grading and certification services performed by an AMS grader involving 

examinations, supervision, official documentation, and related services shall be borne by the person, 

group, or plant requesting the service. 

___________________________________ 

Chad Nelson, National Meat Supervisor

Quality Assessment Division

Livestock & Poultry Program
International Commodity Procurement Division Purchases 

FY2022 - Quarter 3 

Commodity Qty in MT PO Value Average Cost 

BEANS, BLACK BAG-50 KG 480 $596,640.00 $1,243.00 

BEANS, PINTO BAG-50 KG 340 $398,260.60 $1,171.35 

BULGUR BAG-50 KG 1970 $2,429,200.90 $1,233.10 

CORNMEAL, SOY-FORT BAG-HP-25 KG 50 $54,009.00 $1,080.18 

CORN-SOY BLEND PLUS BAG-HP-25 KG 8560 $8,629,488.10 $1,008.12 

LENTILS BAG-50 KG 6090 $6,421,297.80 $1,054.40 

OIL, SUNFLOWERSEED CAN-6/4 L 80.022 $487,390.86 $6,090.71 

OIL, VEGETABLE BOTTLE, PLS-6/4 L 670-719 510.056 $1,281,582.29 $2,512.63 

OIL, VEGETABLE CAN-6/4 L 20380.516 $55,619,224.28 $2,729.04 

OIL, VEGETABLE PAIL-20 L 50.011 $183,940.42 $3,678.00 

PEAS, GREEN, SPLIT BAG-50 KG 7270 $5,852,598.00 $805.03 

PEAS, YELLOW, SPLIT BAG-50 KG 26620 $27,636,394.10 $1,038.18 

RICE, 2/7 LG, W-MLD, FORT BAG-50 KG 520 $390,409.00 $750.79 

RICE, 5/20 LG, W-MLD BAG-50 KG 7660 $4,271,032.80 $557.58 

RICE, 5/20 LG, W-MLD, FORT BAG-50 KG 13700 $8,730,357.50 $637.25 

SORGHUM BAG-50 KG 9750 $3,995,225.10 $409.77 

SORGHUM BULK 9000 $3,258,000.00 $362.00 

WHEAT, HARD RED WINTER BULK 109520 $51,428,415.20 $469.58 

WHEAT, SOFT WHITE BULK 155300 $68,950,412.00 $443.98 

Grand Total 377,851 $250,613,877.95 

Commodity Qty in EA PO Value Average Cost 

BAGS, WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE- 50 KG 680,000 $444,380.00 $0.65
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis Form REP-703 Rev. 0, 4/2012



### Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 12/23/2013 Sample Number: 135047-001 Date Collected:12/18/2013 Date Received:12/18/2013 

### 1st Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ug/L Selenium, Se 280 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.2 12/20/2013 11:54 

### Sample Number: 135047-002 Date Collected: 12/18/2013 Date Received:12/18/2013 

### 2nd Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ug/L Selenium, Se 18.1 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.2 12/20/2013 11:59 

### Sample Number: 135047-003 Date Collected:12/18/2013 Date Received:12/18/2013 

### Bioreactor Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ug/L Selenium, Se 1.7 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.2 12/20/2013 12:04

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit. Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 135047 Page 1 of 1
I have a few questions.

1.  Will Federally recognized tribes that want to develop hemp on their reservations need to clear the opportunity with state government?  If so, with who and how will this be done?  Any idea?

2.  Will Federally recognized tribes be afforded any grant opportunities for hemp development?  If so, through who and when?

3. How will potential JV/partnerships be looked at if and when a tribe decides to partner with a developer?

4. Should tribes be working with the Federal departments now to get things moving if they've decided to move forward with hemp?

Christian (Chris) Lopez Gallardo
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3



                         CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


     As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of our report included in this Form 10-K, into Tom Brown, Inc.'s
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 Nos. 33-42991, 33-44225,
33-60191, 33-60842, 33-13157, 33-30069, 33-42011, 333-56577, 333-69353,
333-31426, 333-89031 333-89033, 333-31426 and 333-51320.



                                                             RYDER SCOTT COMPANY

March 13, 2001
Opinion issued April 7, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-01027-CV

———————————

ARNOLD GOFFE, Appellant

V.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE AS 

SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR CERTIFICATEHOLDERS 

OF BEAR STEARNS ASSET BACKED SECURITIES I LLC, 

ASSET BACK-CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-HE11, Appellee

On Appeal from the 334th Judicial District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-77133

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Arnold Goffe, has filed a motion for dismissal of his appeal. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Although there is no certificate of conference, the
2

motion contains a certificate of service on appellee, has been on file with the Court 

for more than 10 days, and no party has responded to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. 

P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2). No other party has filed a notice of appeal and no 

opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. 

P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Massengale.
# C_2004094EN.01003403.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/34

---

Removal from the register of Case C-169/02 (1)

1

(2004/C 94/83)

By order of 6 November 2003 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case C-169/02 (Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Østre Landsret): Dansk Postordreforening v Skattenministeriet.

---

(1)  JO C 156 du 29.6.2002

1

---
FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS

April 13,2015

ABELACOSTA, CLERK

In the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

pd-1354-14

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 4/9/2015 4:05:43 PM

Accepted 4/13/2015 1:20:52 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK

Chester A Staples,Appellant Cause PD-1354-14

From the 12thCourt

The State ofTexas,Appellee of Appeals of Texas

FIRST MOTION TO EXTEND TIME

TO FILE MOTION FORREHEARING

Honorable Court of Criminal Appeals:

Appellant Chester Staples requests a 15-day extension to

file a motion for rehearing pursuant to Rules of Appellate

Procedure 79.6 and 10.5(b). The Court denied his pro se

petition for discretionary review on March 25, 2015.

Appellate Rule 79.6 permits the Court to extend the time

to file a motion for rehearing if a party files a motion for an

extension within the original timeframe to file for rehearing.

Appellate Rule 79.1 requires the filing of a motion for

rehearing within 15 days of the Court's final order. Per

Appellate Rule 10.5(b), a motion to extend time to file must

contain the deadline to file the item in question, the length of

the proposed extension, the number of previous extensions

granted for the item, and the reasonsan extension isneeded.
April 9, 2015 is the original deadline to file for rehearing:

15 calendar days from the order denying the petition.

Necessity for the instant motion arises because, after appeal,

Staples defended himself in this matter and his wife had to

pick up the appellate record from prison to mail it to his

present representative. As of today, the record has not arrived.

No previous extensions to file a motion for rehearing were

granted, and the record is essential to effectively invite the

Court to reconsider its prior order.

For these reasons, Staples asks the Court to grant this

motion for a 15-dayextensionto file a motion forrehearing.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Harley Martin

Harley Martin

SBN 24068879

512-679-2110

P.O. Box 2331

Austin, Texas 78768

harley.esq(o)gmail.com

For Chester Alan Staples
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This motion was electronically served on the Anderson

County District Attorney at 500 North Church Street,

Palestine, Texas 75801, and the State Prosecuting Attorney at

P.O. Box 13046 Austin, Texas 78711-3046 on April 9,2015.

/s/Harley Martin

Harley Martin
oli:-05-2tJI5 _ 

....,.-, I -:t £ 3 e:: Lrsa Matz ---i.Y~'f to fi, X-"'.,.__,l_'---' -v -'-'::___ ___ Cniil:lerk,---StiLf)J.st-r#er--------

----------------------

•_r:fJn__c/_eiJ;_b_ pec.lo po.tl\ lo.~ -f-h&HlQS ~_.(__ _ 

_Cor_k 'j per med.Lo at e ~+(\ oer&an£\ .. 

~l~z: . /a ~ /~'( Ia. COpt'o _ 

.--J'

de 

'--""' 1---

e0 te 

p~ceoo 

::Cb.~e. 

de T:Oc

d~en 

:s Q~ n 

ptn' /11 ~ 

....._ b _ 

m~ v~~·~--------------------

~'CG.Cl ~ pc SCJ a lm~ y -PJL/ a{~CCJ lfb :\ 

----------------- ~al 11rd-~ (\\o Ro ~-< \·g..uc c 

---------------- 3~2 1~2 ______ _ 

!I- 0 ~ - 2.0 \5 
Page 1 ofl 

';. .. . . ... 

Posting Date: ·: 2011-07-06 . ': 

Sequence#: . 4870063893 

Accounf:#: 957833932 

Routing Transit: 11100061 

Amount#: $1000.00 

Check/Serial#: 000000909990 · 

.B.ank.#: 201 

Tran Code: 009990 

IRD: 0 

ItemType: ·· P 

BOFD: . 111900057 

Cost Center: 7418·57 

TellerNumber: 3 ·-- ~.ifeH~S~bei: 130 · ... : . · .. · Processi,ng ·Date: 201 ~ 0706 ~~~4~,·--~•~:s.-.-~•~CE~·ua .... •s•r .. •s .. ;_.~, .... --~s~•~ 

~1157it ·:t 1M~ 7- :s- lr 

9990 

l ·-- I "~. 

Is · ~ ~ o .. it · . a. c.,. C'-.Q . i• 'a ~~1 . · ' 

,,! : one 

I }j . 'r = CHAsEO a JPMarpn Ch- 111111, N.A. 

A · -CftUI.oMI 

k) tl'fig..:L I $ I, 00() l ci.:s ~ad """" l)tl~r6 m == 

.Jt 0 ~ud 12, oJv= 18~ qs?a:~~q32n•qqqo 

--- ·, 

.. . - .· -· ··- · 

4/6/2013 
. -· --· -

=