alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Rose Reede, Appellant, v Honey Karp, Respondent, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Rose Reede, Appellant, v *660Honey Karp, Respondent, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.)

In two related actions to recover real estate sales commissions, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), entered November 16, 1989, which denied her motion in Action Number 1, to compel the respondent to turn over to her commissions allegedly due and owing to her for her role as a salesperson in a real estate transaction consummated on June 26, 1989, and (2) an order of the same court, also entered November 16, 1989, which denied her motion in Action Number 2 to compel the respondent to hold in escrow commissions allegedly due and owing to her for her role as a salesperson in a second real estate transaction consummated on August 9, 1989.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The plaintiff is a licensed real estate salesperson employed by Lefcon Properties, Inc. (hereinafter Lefcon). The defendant Honey Karp, a former Lefcon affiliate, terminated her relationship with Lefcon and obtained a judgment against Lefcon, entered July 3, 1989, based on a series of promissory notes.

Lefcon, as broker, and the plaintiff as salesperson, earned commissions for two real estate transactions consummated on June 26, 1989, and August 9, 1989, respectively. Before these commissions were paid to Lefcon, however, Karp served a Restraining Notice to Garnishee on the attorney for the seller in the first transaction, and an Execution with Restraining Notice to Garnishee on the attorney for the sellers in the second transaction. Thereafter, the plaintiff commenced the instant actions.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the commissions on the transactions were due and owing to Lefcon (Real Property Law § 294-b [1], [2]). The plaintiff, as a salesperson, must look to the broker for her portion of the commission (Real Property Law § 442-a; *Myles v Litas Investing Co.,*152 AD2d 731). Karp, as a prior judgment creditor of the broker Lefcon enforced her previous judgment against the debt owed to Lefcon by the sellers for commissions payable from the real estate transactions in issue *(see,*CPLR 5202 [a]). Karp’s claim against Lefcon, therefore, takes priority over the plaintiff’s claim *(see, Matter of Mason v Belski,*82 AD2d 939). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Eiber and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Order entered April 10, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00170-CV

ERIC DRAKE, Appellant

V.

CARMEN SIFUENTES, CONSUMERS COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE, Appellees

No. 05-13-00871-CV

ERIC DRAKE, Appellant

V.

TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, ET AL., Appellees

No. 05-13-00894-CV

ERIC DRAKE, Appellant

V.

KRISTINA KASTL, Appellee

No. 05-13-01520-CV

ERIC DRAKE, Appellant

V.

TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, ET AL., Appellees
No. 05-14-00355-CV

ERIC DRAKE, Appellant

V.

STEPHEN WALKER, ET AL., Appellees

ORDER

Before the Court En Banc

The Court DENIES appellant’s April 9, 2015 “Motion to Recuse and Disqualify.”

To the extent appellant’s motion can be construed as an objection to Justice O’Neill 

sitting as a visiting justice, we OVERRULE the objection as untimely. See TEX. GOV’T CODE 

ANN. § 75.551(c) (West 2013).

We further OVERRULE appellant’s objection to the submission of the appeals without 

oral argument.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Sl()-l(H)9()2-()2( )

• ••''•.•X' ) 

# BIL L HOR N SUPERVISOR , FIFT H DISTRIC T SA N DIEG O COUNT

Y BOAR D O F SUPERVISORS 

### . r-; ^ QpERAIlON S

Augus t 24 . 201 0 Th e Honorabl

e Ra y LaHood Sccrciary , U.S . Departmen

t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , Sl'i Washingto n D.C . 2059 0 Dea r Secretar y LaHood : Thi s lette r i s sen t t o conve y m y suppor t fo r the applicatio n an

d proposa l o f the Count y o/'Sa n Dieg o fo r agran t unde r the Smal

l Communit

y Air Servic e Developmen

t Progra mfo r McClcllan-Paloma

r Airport . Sa n Dieg o Count

y ha s tw o commercia

l airports ; Sa

n Dieg o Internationa

l Airport , owne

d an d operated b y Sa n Dieg o Count

y Regiona l Airpor t Authorit y an d McClellan-Paloma

r Airport , owne d an d operate d b

y the Count

y o f Sa n Diego . Th

e tw o airport s ar

e approximatel

y 3 5 mile s apar t wit h Sa n Dieg o Internationa

l Airpor t located i n downtown Sa

n Dieg o an

d McClellan-Paloma

r locate d i n Nort h Sa n Dieg o County . McClellan-Paloma r Airpor t i s ideall y locate d fo r the Nort h Count y populatio n bas e of

ove r on e million residents . Unfortunately , McClellan-Paloma r Airpor t i s currentl

y bein g served b

y onl y on e airline tha

t provide s commute

r aircraf t llight s t o Lo s Angeles . McClellan-Paloma r Airpor t ha s a n urgen t nee d fo r ai r servic e developmen

t an d marketing t

o attrac t ne w ai r servic e t o ke y hu b airports . Count y o f Sa n Dieg o Airport s i s developin g aprogra mt o hel p recruit ne w servic e t o mee t th e need s o f residents o f

Nort h Sa n Dieg o County . Th e Count y i s requestin g a$500,00 0 gran t fro mthe Departmen

t o f Transportatio n unde

r th e Smal l Communit

y Ai r Servic e Developmen

t Progra mt o properly fun

d thi s recruiting project . Th e local-communit

y ha s expresse d supjjor

t t o provide fundin

g fo r the development , marketingi an

d advertisin g o f

new ai r service . Th

e applicatio n being submitte d b y Count y o f Sa n Dieg o Airport s i s ver

y detaile d an

d wel l supported , showing necessar y justificatio n fo

r thi s project . 1 woul d sinc £ Sa n Diet ! appreciat

e you r consuleratio n o

f the proposa

l bein g submitted b

y Count y o f Than k yo u fo r yjm r assistance .

Bil l Hor n Supervisor , Fift

h Distric t Count y o f Sa n Dieg o 160 0 PACIFI C HIGHWAY . ROO M 335 . SA N DIEGO . CALIFORNI A 92101-247 0 « (619 ) 531-555 5 • FA X (619 ) 685-255 5 • Q . bill.horn@sdcounty.ca.go v
**Exhibit 35.2**

**Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.**

​

I, Steven N. Owenson, Senior Vice President and Finance Director of Deere Credit Services, Inc., state:

​

A review of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s activities for the period from June 18, 2024 (the date of issuance of the John Deere Owner Trust 2024-B transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation AB) through October 27, 2024 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 18, 2024 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables LLC and John Deere Owner Trust 2024-B has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

​

​

​

| ​                | ​                     | ​                                    |
|------------------------|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Date: January 10, 2025 | Deere Credit Services, Inc. |
| ​                | ​                     | ​                                    |
| ​                | By:                         | */s/ Steven N. Owenson*                    |
| ​                | ​                     | Steven N. Owenson                          |
| ​                | ​                     | Senior Vice President and Finance Director |
| ​                | ​                     | ​                                    |
| ​                | ​                     | ​                                    |

​

----
CUSIP   756011102
                          REAL-ESTATEFORLEASE.COM, INC.


              INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                                                               SEE REVERSE FOR
                                  COMMON STOCK               CERTAIN DEFINITIONS



                                    SPECIMAN


This
certifies
that







is the owner of


 FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF
                          REAL-ESTATEFORLEASE.COM, INC.


(hereinafter  called  the  "Corporation"),  transferable  on  the  books  of the
Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney,  upon
surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed.  This certificate and the shares
represented hereby are issued and shall be held subject to all the provisions of
the Certificate of Incorporation  and the Bylaws of the Corporation,  as amended
(copies of which are on file at the  office of the  Transfer  Agent),  to all of
which  the  holder  of this  Certificate  by  acceptance  hereof  assents.  This
Certificate  is not valid unless  countersigned  and  registered by the Transfer
Agent and  Registrar.  Witness  the  facsmile  seal of the  Corporation  and the
facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.


DATE:


                            [CORPORATE SEAL OMITTED]



                               Countersigned:
PRESIDENT                                    SECURITIES TRANSFER CORPORATION
                                             P.O. Box 701629
                                             Dallas, TX 75370
                                          By:


SECRETARY                                    ___________________________________
                                             TRANSFER AGENT-AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9492]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in open session at 
2 p.m. on Monday, April 23, 2012, to consider the following matters:
    Summary Agenda: No substantive discussion of the following items is 
anticipated. These matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a 
member of the Board of Directors requests that an item be moved to the 
discussion agenda.
    Disposition of minutes of previous Board of Directors' Meetings.

Summary reports, status reports, reports of the Office of Inspector 
General, and reports of actions taken pursuant to authority delegated 
by the Board of Directors.
Memorandum and resolution re: Final Rule Regarding Calculating the 
Maximum Obligation the FDIC May Incur in Liquidating a Covered 
Financial Company.
Memorandum and resolution re: Final Rule under Dodd-Frank Section 
203(e) Providing for the Treatment of a Mutual Insurance Holding 
Company as an Insurance Company.
Personnel Matters.

    Discussion Agenda:

Memorandum and resolution re: Update of Projected Deposit Insurance 
Fund Losses, Income, and Reserve Ratios for the Restoration Plan.

    The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of 
the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street NW., Washington, DC.
    This Board meeting will be webcast live via the Internet and 
subsequently made available on-demand approximately one week after the 
event. Visit http://www.vodium.com/goto/fdic/boardmeetings.asp to view 
the event. If you need any technical assistance, please visit our Video 
Help page at: http://www.fdic.gov/video.html.
    The FDIC will provide attendees with auxiliary aids (e.g., sign 
language interpretation) required for this meeting. Those attendees 
needing such assistance should call 703-562-2404 (Voice) or 703-649-
4354 (Video Phone) to make necessary arrangements.
    Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be 
directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the 
Corporation, at 202-898-7043.

    Dated: April 16, 2012.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9492 Filed 4-16-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
```
## U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 09-1229 MAGUETTE FAYE, Petitioner,

v . ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Repondent.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on September 2, 2009, is amended as follows: On page 5, line 16, "August 1, 2009" is changed to "August, 1, 2007".
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 23, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10842 Conference Calendar

ALFREDO ALVAREZ, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CV-327

-------------------- Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Alfredo Alvarez, federal prisoner # 30170-077, appeals the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction because it was not filed in the district of his incarceration. Alvarez argues that he should be allowed to proceed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 because the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 remedy is inadequate to raise his Bailey v. United States , 516 U.S. 137 (1995) claim. He argues in the alternative that theNo. 05-10842 -2- district court should have construed his petition as an amendment to his initial § 2255 motion. A § 2241 petition must be filed in the district where the prisoner is incarcerated; as the sentencing court, the district court indeed lacked jurisdiction to entertain Alvarez’s pleading as a § 2241 petition. Hooker v. Sivley , 187 F.3d 680, 681-82 (5th Cir. 1999). Alvarez’s pleading challenged his conviction and sentence based on errors that allegedly occurred during the criminal proceedings; these claims should have been brought in a § 2255 proceeding. Davis v. Fechtel , 150 F.3d 486, 490 (5th Cir. 1998). Alvarez has already unsuccessfully sought § 2255 relief, and, therefore, the instant pleading, which raised claims that were or could have been raised in a prior motion, was successive. United States v. Orozco-Ramirez , 211 F.3d 862, 867 (5th Cir. 2000). Alvarez had not received prior permission from us to file a successive § 2255 motion; consequently, the district court was without jurisdiction to construe his petition as a § 2255 motion. Hooker , 187 F.3d at 681-82. The dismissal for lack of jurisdiction was therefore appropriate. Finally, Alvarez’s contentions that (1) the district court erred in withdrawing the 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) reference of his case to the magistrate judge; (2) the district court abused its discretion in denying him an evidentiary hearing; (3) his § 2241 petition was supported by facts which demonstrate his entitlement to relief; and (4) the district court abused its discretion inNo. 05-10842 -3- failing to consider the merits of his claims are inadequately briefed and are therefore waived. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF INTERIM PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)**


**OF
      THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Airbee Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, E.
      Eugene Sharer, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of the operations of the
      Company.





/s/
                E. Eugene SharerE.
                Eugene SharerInterim
                Principal Financial Officer





November
      19, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 76 (Thursday, April 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9388]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER12-1472-000]


Conch Energy Trading, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Conch Energy Trading, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is May 2, 2012.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a6e0e3f4e5e9c8cacfc8c3f5d3d6d6c9d4d2e6c0c3d4c588c1c9d0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e3a5a6b1a0ac8d8f8a8d86b09693938c9197a385869180cd848c95">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: April 12, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9388 Filed 4-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

   <ARTICLE>        5
   <MULTIPLIER>     1,000
          
   <S>                               <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                     7-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Dec-31-1996
   <PERIOD-START>                    Jun-01-1996
   <PERIOD-END>                      Dec-31-1996
   <CASH>                            3074
   <SECURITIES>                      0
   <RECEIVABLES>                     2545
   <ALLOWANCES>                      66
   <INVENTORY>                       314
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                  6535
   <PP&E>                            6244
   <DEPRECIATION>                    925
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                    14931
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             3816
   <BONDS>                           0
   <COMMON>                          2912
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0
   <PREFERRED>                       0
   <OTHER-SE>                        8203
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      14931
   <SALES>                           6150
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                  5653
   <CGS>                             6955
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                     8896
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                  0
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                  0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                (37)
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                   (3280)
   <INCOME-TAX>                      0
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>               (3280)
   <DISCONTINUED>                    0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
   <CHANGES>                         0
   <NET-INCOME>                      (3280)
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                     (.11)
   <EPS-DILUTED>                     (.11)
           
   
</TABLE>
Exhibit
31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, R. Clay Hulette, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp

2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4 The registrants other certifying
officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change
in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying
officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.

|Date: February 14, 2008 | /s/R. Clay Hulette   ****                        | 
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|                        | R. Clay Hulette                                 
|                        | Vice President and Chief
      Financial Officer

---