alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Angela Britt 

To: AMS - SCP FVIAC 

Subject: [External Email]Produce Farmer in Kansas 

Date: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 12:00:23 AM 

[External Email] 

If this message comes from an unexpected sender or references a vague/unexpected topic; 

Use caution before clicking links or opening attachments. 

Please send any concerns or suspicious messages to: Spam.Abuse@usda.gov 

To Whom it may concern: I have a concern I would like the FVIAC to look into and address. 

I am a farmer in Manhattan, KS. Our family owned business has been in operation since 1948 

and specializes in growing fruits and vegetables. We run a roadside stand, participate in local 

farmers markets, sell wholesale to local grocery stores and businesses and dabble in various 

agritourism activities. I would like to see an insurance system in space that actually takes care 

of producers such as ourselves when we have losses, The current way our local FSA office is 

running the NAP program makes it impossible for us to be paid on our losses because they 

will not accept our records. We have tried a variety of ways such as keeping picking records, 

requesting FSA field appraisals and getting signed statements from a sample of our customers. 

Our efforts have been shot down at every effort because we do not have sales records like 

row crop farmers do. Producers of corn and soybeans can get appraisals, an alfalfa producer 

only has to submit a statement saying how many cuttings were produced. It's been 

recommended to us that the FSA will accept our records if we get signed receipts from every 

sale at farmers markets. That's just not feasible in a fast paced environment. We have been 

denied appraisals and overall been shut down from receiving anything for our losses from a 

program that is actively seeking out and advertising its services to direct to consumer 

producers. Those same producers that it will NOT pay out for losses because they are unable 

to satisfy the FSA office in Kansas. I know many producers in the state who have this 

problem. I'd like a program that works and doesn't discriminate against smaller farms that sell 

direct to the consumer. As a woman farmer whose farm has been with the FSA NAP program 

for a long time, I am disappointed at the inability to be a useful part of the USDA. 

Thank you for your time. 

Angela Britt

 --

Britt's Garden Acres 

1000 S Scenic Dr 

Manhattan, KS 66503 

(785)539-1901
Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 14, 2015.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-15-00043-CV

REGINALD J. HUNTER AND NEKISHA T. HUNTER, Appellants 

V.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, 

AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER OF CWABS, INC., 

ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2007-4, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 190th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-55014 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an attempted appeal from an order signed December 8, 2014, 

granting appellee’s application to proceed with an expedited foreclosure under 

Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 736. On April 1, 2015, appellee filed a motion to 

dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellants 

have not filed a response to the motion. 
2

An order granting an application filed pursuant to Rule 736 is not subject to 

appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 736.8(c). Any challenge to a Rule 736 order must be made 

in a separate suit filed in a court of competent jurisdiction. Id. We have no 

discretion to do anything but dismiss an attempted appeal from a Rule 736 order. 

Grant–Brooks v. FV–1, Inc., 176 S.W.3d 933, 933 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2005, pet. 

denied); see also Barriere v. Am. Serv. Mortg. Co., No. 14–10–00617–CV, 2010 

WL 3504755, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Sept. 9, 2010, no pet.) 

(mem. op.). 

Therefore, we grant appellee’s motion. The appeal is ordered dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby.
Exhibit 4.1 


   





 Alaia Capital, LLC 


 62 West 45th St. 


 5th Floor 


 New York, NY 10036 

   


   


 June 10, 2022 


   


   


 Preservation 95 Fund, m+ funds Trust, Series 7-7 


   


 c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee

240 Greenwich Street, 22W Floor 


 New York, New York 10286 








   


   


		 Re: 	 m+ funds Trust, Series 7-7 (the “Trust”) 



   


   


 Ladies and Gentlemen: 


   


 We have examined Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement (File No. 333-264264) for the above captioned Trust. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement of the references
to Alaia Capital, LLC as evaluator. 


   


 You are hereby authorized to file a copy of
this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 


   


   


   


	   	 Very truly yours, 	   
	   	   	   
	   	   	   
	   	 Alaia Capital, LLC 	   
	   	   	   
	   	   	   
	   	 By: 	 /s/ Ian Shainbrown 	   
	   	   	 Name: Ian Shainbrown 	   
	   	   	 Title:  Executive Vice President
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Action Industries, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, I, Stephanie Passalaqua, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  May 1, 2008 Action Industries, Inc. By:  /s/ Stephanie Passalaqua Stephanie Passalaqua  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Action Industries, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, I, Inna Sheveleva, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  May 1, 2008 Action Industries, Inc. By:  /s/ Inna Sheveleva Inna Sheveleva
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 78 (Monday, April 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24200-24201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9696]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[CERCLA-04-2012-3770, FRL-9663-8]


American Drum & Pallet, Memphis, Shelby County, TN; Notice of 
Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation 
and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States Environmental Protection 
Agency has entered into a settlement for reimbursement of past response 
costs concerning the American Drum and Pallet Superfund Site located in 
Memphis, Shelby County, Tennessee for publication.

[[Page 24201]]


DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until 
May 23, 2012. The Agency will consider all comments received and may 
modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received 
disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from Ms. Paula V. 
Painter. Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. CERCLA-04-
2012-3770 or Site name American Drum & Pallet Superfund Site by one of 
the following methods:
    <bullet> www.epa.gov/region4/superfund/programs/enforcement/enforcement.htm1.
    <bullet> Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b0e0d1d9dec4d5c29ee0d1c5dcd1f0d5c0d19ed7dfc6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="88d8e9e1e6fcedfaa6d8e9fde4e9c8edf8e9a6efe7fe">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

    Dated: April 9, 2012.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Superfund 
Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-9696 Filed 4-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6033

FRANKLIN ALMA,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JENIFER WALL; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (5:14-hc-02066-FL)

Submitted: March 19, 2015 Decided: April 7, 2015

Before WILKINSON and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Franklin Alma, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Aubrey West, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Franklin Alma, a federal prisoner, appeals the district 

court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Alma v. Wall, No. 5:14-hc-02066-FL (E.D.N.C. Dec. 29, 

2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
MICRO-GRANTS FOR FOOD SECURITY 

PROGRAM (MGFSP)

OUTCOMES AND INDICATORS

The grant program outcome and performance measures outlined below reflect direct stakeholder feedback and 

provide a framework that allows grant recipients to evaluate project activities more accurately in relation to 

each program’s statutory purpose.

For recipients, the measures are:

• More feasible to accomplish and measure within a grant’s period of performance;

• Better aligned with grant program purpose and recipient activities; and

• More reflective of work performed during the project.

These performance measures will go into effect beginning with the FY2023 grant application cycle.

OUTCOME 1: INCREASE THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF LOCALLY GROWN FOOD FOR FOOD

INSECURE INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND COMMUNITIES

1.1 Total number of individuals being fed as a result of the project (The total may include, but is not 

limited to, family members, neighbors, friends, community members, customers, etc.) .

1.2 Total number of individuals participating in the project . (The total should exclude the number of 

individuals being fed, which is captured in 1.1. The total may include, but is not limited to, family 

members, community members, volunteers, gardeners, farm managers, farm workers, carpenters, 

contractors, etc.)

1.3 The number of small-scale operations that will be created or expanded as a result of the project:

1.3a Gardening operation(s) .

1.3b Herding operation(s) .

1.3c Livestock operation(s) .

1.4 The amount of food grown or produced, measured in:

1.4a Pounds (lbs.) .

1.4b Gallons (liquids) .

1.4c Number of animals .

1.4d Number of crops .

1.4e Number of animal or crop varieties .

1.4f Dollars ($) from animal and/or crop sales. .

1.4g Other measurement (please specify) .
1.5 The amount of food stored or processed, measured in:

1.5a Pounds (lbs.) .

1.5b Gallons (liquids) .

1.5c Number of animals .

1.5d Number of crops .

1.5e Number of animal or crop varieties .

1.5f Dollars ($) from animal and/or crop sales. .

1.5g Other measurement (please specify) .

1.6 The amount of food storage or processing space created or increased, measured in:

1.6a Square feet (sq. ft.) .

1.6b Other measurement (please specify) .

1.7 The amount of fencing installed to protect livestock and/or crops, measured in:

1.7a Square feet (sq. ft.) .

1.7b Other measurement (please specify) .
FINANCIAL REPORT
Betz Laboratories, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                               
TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS:

      The management of Betz Laboratories, Inc. is responsible for the 
preparation and presentation of the financial statements and other financial 
information contained in the Annual Report. The financial statements include 
amounts that are based on management's best estimates and judgments. These 
statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting 
principles and have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors.

      The Company and its subsidiaries maintain adequate accounting systems 
and financial controls. The quality and scope of our accounting systems and 
financial controls are augmented by ongoing internal audit programs. In 
addition, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors periodically meets 
with management, our internal audit group and representatives of Ernst & Young 
LLP to discuss financial reporting matters as well as to review auditing and 
internal control procedures.



George L. James, III
Vice President - Finance,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
January 30, 1996
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0001021

10-APR-2015

07:46 AM
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10(b)  


  
 

  Consent of Independent Accountants    
  


We hereby consent to the use, in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-41577) of our report dated March 1, 2002, relating to
the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company, which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the use in
this Registration Statement of our report dated April 2, 2002, on our audits of the financial statements of Variable Annuity Account A of Protective Life, which appears in such
Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Independent Accountants" in such Registration Statement. 


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Birmingham, Alabama

April 25, 2002 









QuickLinks


Consent of Independent Accountants
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40662

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANTONIO GAONA-GAONA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:13-CR-816-1

Before KING, JOLLY, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Antonio Gaona-Gaona has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Gaona-Gaona has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as GaonaGaona’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 10, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-40662 Document: 00513001667 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/10/2015
No. 14-40662

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

Gaona-Gaona’s motion for appointment of new counsel on appeal is DENIED.

2

 Case: 14-40662 Document: 00513001667 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/10/2015
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1221 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1221

 To amend the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 to 
   reaffirm the authority of the Under Secretary of Agriculture for 
      Research, Education, and Economics, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2019

    Ms. Pingree (for herself, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Ms. 
 DeLauro, Mr. Pocan, Ms. Lee of California, Ms. McCollum, Mr. Cuellar, 
 Mr. McGovern, Ms. Fudge, Mr. Carbajal, Mr. Panetta, Ms. Kuster of New 
  Hampshire, and Ms. Norton) introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 to 
   reaffirm the authority of the Under Secretary of Agriculture for 
      Research, Education, and Economics, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as ``Agriculture Research Integrity Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. REAFFIRMING AUTHORITY OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE FOR 
              RESEARCH, EDUCATION, AND ECONOMICS.

    Subtitle F of the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 
1994 (7 U.S.C. 6971 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:

``SEC. 253. REAFFIRMING AUTHORITY OF THE UNDER SECRETARY.

    ``(a) In General.--Notwithstanding the authority specified in 
Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1953 (5 U.S.C. App.; 7 U.S.C. 2201 note) 
or any other provision of Federal law relating to the authority of the 
Secretary, including section 296--
            ``(1) the Agricultural Research Service, the Economic 
        Research Service, the National Agricultural Statistics Service, 
        and the National Institute for Food and Agriculture, and any 
        successor agencies shall be within the research, education, and 
        economics mission area of the Department;
            ``(2) the authority to administer such agencies is vested 
        in the Under Secretary for Research, Education, and Economics; 
        and
            ``(3) such authority may not be vested in the head of 
        another agency or office within the Department.
    ``(b) Location.--The Secretary shall locate each agency referred to 
in subsection (a)(1) and the majority of the staff of each such agency 
within the National Capital Region to ensure maximum coordination and 
interaction with each other such agency, with the agencies delivering 
food and agricultural programs and services of the Department, and with 
other Federal Government science agencies (including science agencies 
of the Department).''.
                                 <all>
```
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

457 CA 16-01638 PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

NICHOLAS DOMINICK AND LORRAINE J. DOMINICK, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

V ORDER

CHARLES MILLAR & SON CO., CHARLES MILLAR SUPPLY, INC., MILLAR SUPPLY, INC., PACEMAKER MILLAR STEEL & INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COMPANY, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO CHARLES MILLAR & SON SUPPLY, INC., PACEMAKER MILLAR STEEL & INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY OF BINGHAMTON, INC., PACEMAKER STEEL & ALUMINUM OF BINGHAMTON CORP., PACEMAKER STEEL AND PIPING CO., INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR TO CHARLES MILLAR, PACEMAKER STEEL WAREHOUSE INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP, ALBANY (GEORGE F. CARPINELLO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

BELLUCK & FOX, LLP, NEW YORK CITY (SETH A. DYMOND OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Charles C. Merrell, J.), entered December 3, 2015. The order denied the motion of defendants-appellants to set aside the jury verdict.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens , 155 AD2d 435; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]).

Entered: April 28, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
-83 -82 -81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76

 37

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■ ■ ■

★●

●

●

★

● ●

● ●
DERECK CHAMBLISS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3389

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 13, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Kevin J. Carroll, Judge.

Michael J. Titus, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Region 

One, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee; Dereck R. Chambliss, pro se, 

Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 100PA14

FILED 10 April 2015

TERRY WAYNE WOOD

v.

JEREMY NUNNERY, NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY, and FIREMEN’S INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

WASHINGTON, D.C.

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous, 

unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 757 S.E.2d 526

(2014), affirming an order entered on 11 February 2013 by Judge Edwin G. Wilson, 

Jr. in Superior Court, Forsyth County. On 11 June 2014, the Supreme Court allowed 

plaintiff’s conditional petition for discretionary review as to additional issues. Heard 

in the Supreme Court on 12 January 2015.

Maynard & Harris, Attorneys at Law, PLLC, by C. Douglas Maynard, Jr., for 

plaintiff-appellant/appellee.

Van Laningham Duncan PLLC, by L. Cooper Harrell; Smith Moore 

Leatherwood LLP, by James G. Exum, Jr.; and Bennett & Guthrie, PLLC, by 

Rodney A. Guthrie and Roberta King Latham, for defendantappellant/appellee Jeremy Nunnery.

Brown Moore & Associates, PLLC, by Jon R. Moore; and White & Stradley, 

PLLC, by J. David Stradley, for North Carolina Advocates for Justice, amicus 

curiae.

Pinto Coates Kyre & Bowers, PLLC, by Deborah J. Bowers, for North Carolina 

Association of Defense Attorneys, amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.
WOOD V. NUNNERY

Opinion of the Court

-2-

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
-77.4 -77.2 -77.0 -76.8 -76.6 -76.4 -76.2 -76.0 -75.8

 38.8

 39.0

 39.2

 39.4

 39.6

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/22

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL