alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 02 79 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 - CE - 0 07 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **:** 

### G. Keith Noles **Date**

**Branch Manager Date**
**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Thomas Kirchner, certify that: 

  1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of INverso Corp.;  

  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  

  3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  

  4) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  

  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; and  

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and  

  5) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  

  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and  

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.  

Date: October 29, 2004 

By:   /s/   Thomas Kirchner 

    Thomas Kirchner

    Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          20,158
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  121,911
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,226)
<INVENTORY>                                     77,572
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,802
<PP&E>                                         139,271
<DEPRECIATION>                                  84,865
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 314,448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          116,205
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,207
<OTHER-SE>                                     127,193
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   314,448
<SALES>                                        344,877
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               344,877
<CGS>                                          224,542
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  224,542
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               103,747
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,770
<INCOME-TAX>                                       965
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,805
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,805
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .78
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CB Richard Ellis Realty Trust (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Laurie E. Romanak, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/ LAURIE E. ROMANAK  
|Laurie E. Romanak      
|Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 14,
2010
In The Matter Of: 

### SERVED: February 21, 2017 

## DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC 

## 2111 fEB**2~** p 

## 3: 

## 03 

## DOCKET OPERATIONS DocketNo. FAA-2014-0115 Redemption Air, Inc. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2013AL030106 Respondent



### ORDER SETTING PREHEARING CONFERENCE On October 28, 2016, the undersignedjudge issued a Notice ofHearing, settingthe hearing to begin onApril17, 2017. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.205(a)(l) and (7), 

### IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The parties shall appear bytelephone for a prehearing conference withthe undersigned judge on 

### March 31, 2017 at 2pm Eastern time. 2. The parties shall access the conference by dialing telephone number 

### 888-204-5984 and then inputting access code 

### 6392406 when prompted. 3. During the conference, the parties shall be prepared to discuss their witness and exhibit lists, the issues in dispute, the status ofany settlement negotiations, and any otherrelated matters.

Attachment: Service List

# ::;;P~--___,..--.-.- DOUGLAS M. RA WALD Administrative LawJudgeSERVICE LIST - BYU.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

Brent R. Cole, Respondent's Counsel LawOffice ofBrent R. Cole, P.C. 821 N Street, Suite 208 Anchorage AK 99501 TEL: 907-277-8001 FAX: 907-277-8002 Glenn H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Enforcement Division, Western Team 222 West 7th Avenue, #14 Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 TEL: 907-271-5271 FAX: 907-271-2800 ONE COPY

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0115 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### UNION BANK, a California Corporation, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Weldon FERRIS, Judge of the District Court, Respondent.

No. 52828.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Nov. 21, 1978.

McClelland, Collins, Sheehan, Bailey & Bailey by James E. Britton, Oklahoma City, for petitioner.

Myers, Mollison & Weber by Larry M. Weber, Altus, for respondent.

BARNES, Justice:

In this case, Union Bank, a California corporation, petitions this Court and asks us to assume original jurisdiction and issue a Writ of Prohibition, prohibiting the Respondent Trial Judge from exercising personal jurisdiction over said Bank. The material facts giving rise to the jurisdictional controversy are as follows:

The Plaintiff below, Mr. Carlos Brewer, delivered a draft to the First State Bank of Eldorado, Oklahoma, for the purpose of said Bank’s forwarding the draft to the payee Bank, Union Bank of San Francisco, Petitioner in this original proceeding. The draft was never honored or returned, and ultimately Mr. Brewer sued both the First State Bank of Eldorado and Union Bank for mishandling of that draft. Upon receipt of service, the Union Bank made a special appearance and filed a Motion to Quash. In support of that Motion, the *455Bank filed an affidavit sworn to and subscribed by Union Bank’s vice president and counsel, attesting to the fact that Union Bank does not transact any business in the State of Oklahoma, does not have any interest in or possession of real property in the State, that the Bank is not licensed to do business within the State, nor does it solicit, engage in, or do business within the State, and that the Bank does not derive any revenue from services rendered within this jurisdiction.

This affidavit was the *only*evidence before the Trial Court.

Despite the fact that more than two years passed between the filing of Union Bank’s Motion to Quash and the Court’s ruling on that Motion, the Plaintiff below never filed any counter affidavits, nor did he conduct any discovery in order to develop facts to support his claim of jurisdiction.

In Oklahoma, jurisdiction over nonresident defendants cannot be inferred, but must affirmatively appear from the record.1 When a jurisdictional question arises, the burden of proof is upon the party asserting that jurisdiction exists.2 In the case before us, there simply was no evidence before the Trial Court to support the claim of jurisdiction under any statute authorizing jurisdiction over nonresident defendants. This being the case, the Trial Court erred in exercising personal jurisdiction over the Respondent Bank, and the Bank is entitled to relief. Accordingly, we assume original jurisdiction and issue a Writ of Prohibition, prohibiting the Trial Court from further exercising jurisdiction over the Respondent Bank.

ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ASSUMED AND WRIT OF PROHIBITION ISSUED.

HODGES, C. J., LAVENDER, V. C. J., and WILLIAMS, IRWIN, DOOLIN and HARGRAVE, JJ., concur.

1

. *Roberts v. Jack Richards Aircraft Co., Okl.,*536 P.2d 353 (1975); and *Crescent Corp. v. Martin,*Okl., 443 P.2d 111 (1968).

2

. *Roberts v. Jack Richards Aircraft Co.,*Okl., 536 P.2d 353 (1975).
Exhibit 32.1  Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    The undersigned hereby certifies, in my capacity as an officer of NSTAR Electric Company, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:(i)the enclosed Annual Report of NSTAR Electric Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of NSTAR Electric Company.  Dated: March  14, 2007By:/s/ THOMAS J. MAY
Thomas J. May
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . Copies of the agreements are available through the Commission's Web site (                    *www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     012164.                

*Title:*                     KL/WHS Space Charter and Sailing Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. and Wan Hai Lines (Singapore) PTE Ltd.                

*Filing Party:*                     Robert B. Yoshitomi, Esq., Nixon Peabody LLP, Gas Company Tower, 555 West Fifth Street, 46th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90013.                

*Synopsis:*                     The agreement authorizes K Line and Wan Hai to charter space on their respective vessels, coordinate their sailings, and cooperate in the carriage of cargo in the trade between China, Japan, and the Pacific Coast of the United States.                

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Dated: April 13, 2012.

Karen V. Gregory, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-9390 Filed 4-17-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 72 (Friday, April 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 22290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9042]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: Vol. 77, No. 62, 
Friday, March 30, 2012, page 19263.

ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: Wednesday, April 4, 2012, 10 a.m.-
11 a.m.

MEETING CANCELED: For a recorded message containing the latest agenda 
information, call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of 
the Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-
7923.

    Dated: April 3, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9042 Filed 4-11-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

Mr. Elliott P. Laws Crowell & Moring 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 

## JUL .\ 2010 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES

Re: EPA 2010/15 PFOA (Perfluorooctanoic Acid) Stewardship Program
Dear Mr. Laws: Thank you for your letter dated June 16, 2010, in which you raised some potential issues with reporting underthe 2010115 PFOA Stewardship Program ("Program"), particularly with lack ofclarity about reporting requirements for sales ofintermediates by the Program members to non-Program members. You recommendtwo options forreporting improvements that you believe will help clarify the Programresults. You suggestthat additional improvements would be best timed to become effective with the 2011 reporting year. The Agency recognizes that consistentreporting by the members is very importantto the success ofthe Program. We will fully considerthe issues that you highlighted and your recommendations. As we have discussed with your client, the Agency will release additional reporting clarifications by the end of2011, after reviewingthe 2010 milestone reports due to the Agency by Program members on October 31, 2011. Again, thank you for your letter and support for our activities, and I hope the information provided is helpful. Ifyou have additional questions, please contactToni Krasnic (krasnic.tonicmepa.gov; 202-564-0984).

Internet Address (URL) 0 http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable. Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bar Association
Members/State Street Collective Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Philip J. Lussier, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                         /s/ Philip J. Lussier
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Philip J. Lussier
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        August 11, 2006
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tengion, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian Davis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November 2, 2010




/s/ A. Brian Davis


A.Brian Davis


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-21-00005-CV

__________________

BARRIE HANSEN, Appellant

V.

GABRIELLE N. HANSEN, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 18-09-13017-CV 

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 7, 2021, we notified the parties that the notice of appeal did not 

appear to have been timely filed. The appellant did not file a response. The trial court 

signed a final judgment on December 26, 2019. It appears that the appellate 

timetables were extended by the timely filing of a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 26.1(a). Notice of appeal was due to be filed on March 25, 2020.

Appellant filed a notice of appeal on January 5, 2021, more than ninety days 

from the date of the judgment and outside the period for which we may grant an 
2

extension of time to perfect appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. This Court lacks 

jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 PER CURIAM

Submitted on February 3, 2021

Opinion Delivered February 4, 2021

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of CopanoEnergy, L.L.C. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for thequarter ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 10,2006, I, John R. Eckel, Jr., Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to hisknowledge:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934 as amended; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ John R. Eckel, Jr.           John R. Eckel, Jr.     Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerMay 10, 2006