alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,946                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,242                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,458                       0
<PP&E>                                         262,982                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                (49,309)                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 237,583                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,155                       0
<BONDS>                                        312,297                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                     43,360                       0
<COMMON>                                           187                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (142,218)                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   237,583                       0
<SALES>                                         36,973                  13,556
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,826                  14,150
<CGS>                                           26,248                   9,011
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,248                   9,011
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,200                   9,473
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,767)                 (4,296)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,767)                 (4,296)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,767)                 (4,296)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.27)                  (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.27)                  (0.37)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.47

                       ADDENDUM TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENTS

     This Addendum to Stock Option Agreement (the "Addendum") is made and
entered into by and between Diversified Corporate Resources, Inc. a Texas
corporation (the "Company"), and Samuel E. Hunter (the "Optionee").

     WHEREAS, the Company has previously granted to Optionee the options to
purchase (collectively referred to as the "Options") 10,000 shares of common
stock of the Company at $3.00 per share, and another 10,000 shares of common
stock of the Company at $4.00 per share; and

     WHEREAS, the Optionee has previously exercised part of the Options so that
the number of shares remaining to be exercised with respect to the Options are
5,000 shares at $3.00 per share, and 10,000 shares at $4.00 per shares; and

     WHEREAS, both of the Options are subject to a written agreement
(collectively referred to as the "Prior Agreements") between the Company and the
Optionee; and

     Whereas, the purpose of this Addendum is to amend both of the Prior
Agreements as herein set forth.

     For good and valuable consideration requested, the parties hereto agree as
follows:

     1. The expiration date of both of Options shall be, and hereby is, extended
from December 31, 2001 until December 31, 2006.

     2. Except as amended hereby, the Prior Agreements are not amended or
revised and remain in full force and effect.

     This Addendum is effective as of the 9th day of August, 2001.

                                           Diversified Corporate Resources, Inc.


                                           By: /s/ James E. Filarski
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               James E. Filarski, President


                                               /s/ Samuel E. Hunter
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Samuel E. Hunter
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Craig Singleton, Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rose Rubin, J.), rendered April 14, 1989, convicting defendant after jury trial of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fourth degrees, and sentencing him to concurrent, indeterminate terms of *355imprisonment of six to twelve years (two terms) and three to nine years, respectively, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to dismiss the charge of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree and to vacate the sentence imposed thereon, and otherwise affirmed.

Defendant’s convictions result from his sale of two vials of crack to an undercover police officer for $20, and the discovery of an additional forty vials on the premises where the sale occurred.

As the People concede, since the fourth degree possession charge, while not a lesser included offense of third degree possession, arose from possession of the same forty vials of crack, dismissal of this count is appropriate. *(See, People v Gaul,*63 AD2d 563, *lv denied*45 NY2d 780.)

Defendant’s claim that the evidence does not support his conviction for possessing the forty vials of crack is without merit. We find that the evidence presented at trial not only points logically to defendant’s guilt, but excludes, to a moral certainty, every other reasonable hypothesis. *(People v Robertson,*61 AD2d 600, 609, *affd*48 NY2d 993.) Viewed in the light most favorable to the People *(People v Benzinger,*36 NY2d 29, 32), the evidence shows that defendant was the source of the vials that were sold to the undercover officer as well as those found on the two persons arrested with defendant. *(Cf., People v Morales,*162 AD2d 128.)

Defendant was in apparent control of the premises. The possibility that the other two men had some connection with the premises is not entirely excluded by the evidence, but even that possibility does not point to defendant’s innocence, since several people can possess drugs jointly *(People v Tirado,*38 NY2d 955, 956). There is no basis upon which to conclude that either of the other men were on the premises when the undercover officer completed the transaction or that either one of them could have brought the forty vials onto the premises without defendant’s culpable participation.

Defendant’s remaining claims are unpreserved. Were we to reach them in the interest of justice we would find them to be without merit. Defendant did not request that the court conduct a formal inquiry or otherwise challenge the court’s statement that one of the jurors had not been sleeping *(People v Brown,*160 AD2d 172, 174, *lv denied*76 NY2d 785), and defendant consented to the discharge of a sworn juror who wanted to attend a funeral. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Airbee Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, E.
        Eugene Sharer, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of the operations of the
        Company.
 
 /s/
                  E. Eugene SharerE.
                  Eugene SharerInterim
                  Principal Financial OfficerFebruary
                  11, 2008
f.D .&>* i^o&, o^|)'4l fiMvt

(O0.852 -O^

COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS

APR 0 6 2015

AbelAcoste, Clerk

d^^( tvttW// ^/i^if^ ei^ w^fun^ |WVm/^ "h? -fU^. „•

Lc/i

K^aAi^? fcwylw —vaj v^wyfkjl^ Ovwicfc«/ ^W^P^^^yWr \<TMfli
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2011-0916; Dir ID 2011-NM-127-AD

Record of Contacts
## Client/Owner On

- Site Safety	Acknowledgement	Form

Sponsor	/	Owner	Sign

- off

As	the	sponsor	or	owner	of	this	engagement	you	understand	that	Horus	Aerial	Services	operates

under	the	following	rules	and	obligation	to	ensure	the	public	safety	an d	privacy,	and	that	we

follow	all	FAA	rules	and	guidelines.

As	the	sponsor	/	owner	of	this	engagement	you	agree	to	the	following	through	your	initial	of

each	item	and	signature	at	the	bottom	of	this	page.



### Julian	Everly	Creative	Ventures,	Inc. has	advised	you	as	to	the	f ollowing: Initial:

· _We	will	not	fly	within	1	mile	of	FAA	Restricted	Zones

______

· _We	will	not	fly	over 4 00’ AGL of	the	current	launch	elevation

______

· _We	will	not	fly	if	a	50”	Launch/Landing	parameter	cannot	be	established

______

·

_ We	will	land	the	craft	immediately	of	any	technical	issues	occur

______

· _We	will	land	the	craft	if	on

- site	activity	occurs	that	presents	a	security	concern

______



### Privacy	Concerns:

· _If	Neighbors	have	a	privacy	concern,	we	will	not	fly	until	it	is	r esolved

______

· _If	pictures	taken	has	a	privacy	concern,	it	will	not	be	made	available

______



### Safety:

· _You	agree	to	assist	in	the	limiting	of	people	within	the	launch/landing	area

______

· _You	agree	to	assist	in	the	support	of	all	other	identifie d	safety	areas

______



### Safety	Checklist	Signatures

Sponsor	/	Owner

<Name	and	address	is	normally	listed	below>	__________________________________

Julian	Everly	Creative	Ventures,	Inc.

Julian	Wright

2024	R	Street,	NW

Washington,	DC 20009

___________________________
Exhibit 10.17



ADDENDUM IV

May 2, 2005

Extension of Term and payment of Base Rent



|          |  |                                                                                                                                  
|--------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Lessor:   |  | The Richard Oppenheimer Living Trust, the Maurice Oppenheimer Living Trust and the Helene Oppenheimer Living Trust               
|          |  | C/o Castle Management                                                                                                            
|          |  | 12885 Alcosta Blvd. Ste. A                                                                                                       
|          |  | San Ramon, CA 94583                                                                                                              
|          |  |                                                                                                                                  
|Lessee:   |  | Tut Systems, Inc.                                                                                                                
|          |  | 5200 Franklin Drive Ste. 100                                                                                                     
|          |  | Pleasanton, CA 94588                                                                                                             
|          |  |                                                                                                                                  
|Premises: |  | 5200 Franklin Dr., Suite 100, Pleasanton, CA 94588, Commercial Office Space of approximately 17,100+/- square feet, with parking.



The following terms
are intended to modify those provisions set forth in the Lease Dated 11/20/02, as modified by the Addendum, Addendum II and Addendum III as follows:



Term: The Lease Term shall be extended an additional twenty four (24) months commencing July 1, 2005 and ending June 30, 2007.



Base Rent: The Base Rent for months 1 through 12 of the extended term shall be
$15,817.50 per month. The Base Rent for months 13 through 24 of the extended term shall increase to $16,672.50 per month. Base Rent shall be payable by Lessee to Lessor in the same manner as before and shall be subject to all other provisions of the
Lease Agreement including payment of the Lease Agreement previously set forth and contained herein, including but not limited to Common Area Operating Expenses and Real Property Taxes, currently estimated to run $0.51 per square foot per month).
(See paragraphs 4.2 and 10 of the Lease).



|           |  |                        
|---------- |  | -----------------------
|By Lessor: |  | /s/ Richard Oppenheimer
|           |  | Richard Oppenheimer    
|           |  | Trustee                
|           |  |                        
|By Lessee: |  | /s/ Salvatore DAuria  
|           |  | Salvatore DAuria      
|           |  | Chairman of the Board  
|           |  | Tut Systems, Inc.
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 4(f)(ii)

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                       NEW YORK COMMUNITY CAPITAL TRUST II

     This Certificate of Trust of New York Community Capital Trust II ("Trust")
is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned trustees to form a business
trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C. (S)3801 et seq.) (the
                                                ---  -          -- ---
"Act").

          1.   Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is New York
               ----
               Community Capital Trust II.

          2.   Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of
               ----------------
               the Trust in the State of Delaware is Wilmington Trust Company,
               Rodney Square North, 1100 N. Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware
               19890-0001, Attention: Corporate Trust Administration.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate of Trust
in accordance with Section 3811 of the Act.

                               WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its
                               individual capacity but solely as Trustee


                               By:  /s/ Donald G. MacKelcan
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Donald G. MacKelcan
                                      Title: Vice President


                                /s/ Joseph R. Ficalora
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Joseph R. Ficalora, not in his
                               individual capacity but as Administrative Trustee


                                /s/ Robert Wann
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Robert Wann, not in his
                               individual capacity but as Administrative Trustee


                                /s/ Thomas R. Cangemi
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Thomas R. Cangemi, not in his
                               individual capacity but as Administrative Trustee
Order entered October 19 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 16

- 00764

- CR

JACOBY TAYLOR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 195th Judi cial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F07

- 52952

- N



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATES this appeal.
On August 23, 2016, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the
reporter’s record had not been filed. On October 18, 201 6, we received the reporter’s record.
Because findings are no longer necessary, we VACATE the August 23, 2016 order.

We ORDER the reporter’s record filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
<Page>

                                                                Exhibit 10.38


                                  AMENDMENT TO

                              REINSURANCE AGREEMENT

                                   BETWEEN THE

                ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, NORTHBROOK, ILLINOIS
                            (HEREINAFTER "ALLSTATE")

                                       AND

              ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, NORTHBROOK, ILLINOIS
                          (HEREINAFTER "ALLSTATE LIFE")

This Amendment to the Reinsurance Agreement between ALLSTATE and ALLSTATE LIFE
dated June 1, 1992 (hereinafter "Agreement"), shall be effective as of January
1, 1993.

This Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

1.   Schedule A is replaced by the following:

                        ELIGIBLE AND INELIGIBLE POLICIES

          This Agreement covers all hospitalization and disability insurance
          issued directly by ALLSTATE under Master Policy Number LGU 10041 after
          the Effective Date of this Agreement, except for coverage Issued in
          the state of New York.

2.   Nothing in this Amendment shall be construed as changing the terms of the
     Agreement, other than those specifically set out in this Amendment;
     provided, however, that any provision of Agreement that may be in conflict
     with the terms of this Amendment, shall be construed such that it conforms
     to this Amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have caused it to be duly
executed in duplicate by their respective officers on the date shown below.

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY of Northbrook, Illinois

By /s/ Paul Feightner
   -----------------
Title  Vice President
Date   April 22, 1993

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY of Northbrook, Illinois

By /s/ Charles F. Thalheimer
   -------------------------
Title  Assistant Vice President
Date   April 19, 1993
1

The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-3013

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Sergio Medina-Olvera, * [UNPUBLISHED]

a/k/a Sergio Olvera Medina, *

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: February 11, 2003

Filed: April 8, 2003

___________

Before WOLLMAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Sergio Medina-Olvera (Medina) pleaded guilty to possession with the intent

to distribute over 500 grams of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and

(b)(1)(B) and was sentenced to ninety months’ imprisonment.1

 In entering his plea,

Medina reserved his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress evidence that

was seized from his residence and vehicle pursuant to a search warrant. After
-2-

reviewing the record and the parties’ arguments, we are satisfied that the information

included in the warrant application and affidavit was sufficient to support a finding

of probable cause for the issuance of the warrant. Because we believe that an

extended recitation of the facts and the applicable legal principles would have no

precedential value in this fact-intensive case, we affirm without any further

discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
National Organic Standards Board 

Handling Subcommittee Proposal

Marine Algae Listings on the National List

August 31, 2017

Introduction

In 2016 and 2017, the Handling Subcommittee issued a discussion document and proposal on 

the topic of marine algae listings on the National List. These documents sought consistency in 

the nomenclature used to reference the various marine algae approved for and used in organic 

handling. These documents also sought public comment on the sustainability of marine algae 

sources. These documents are linked below.

April 2017

• Proposal: Marine Algae listings on the National List

November 2016

• Discussion Document: Marine Algae Listings on the National List

Request to Stakeholders for Additional Input

The Handling Subcommittee thanks the organic stakeholder community for the input it has 

provided in response to the previously issued discussion & proposal documents. Because of the 

shorter than usual written comment window in advance of the Spring 2017 meeting, a number 

of stakeholders expressed they did not have the time to substantively comment on the 

proposal put forward by the Subcommittee. Because of this, the Handling Subcommittee 

requests further stakeholder input on this topic via the NOSB open comment 

docket: https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=AMS_FRDOC_0001-1600. 

Note that it is not necessary to resubmit comments and suggestions that were previously 

submitted in response to the prior discussion and proposal documents, as the NOSB has 

maintained a complete record of these. Please submit only new comments and suggestions. 

We look forward to receiving your input. 

Approved by Lisa de Lima, Handling Subcommittee Chair, to transmit to NOSB August 29, 2017

NOSB October 2017 proposals and discussion documents 157/175