alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Consultation between Navajo Nation and EPA on Four Corners Power Plant 

June 13, 2012 

9 - 11 AM 

San Francisco, CA 

Agenda

1. Welcome, introductions, and opening remarks by Navajo Nation and EPA 

2. Overview of Navajo Input on Four Corners 

3. Update on Four Corners BART Rulemaking 

4. Economic Impacts to Navajo Nation of the BART Alternative 

5. Updates on Permitting Actions and Lawsuits related to Four Corners Power Plant 

6. Update on EIS/NEPA process for Four Corners and Navajo Mine 

7. Future Partnerships

8. Closing Remarks 

Attendees from the Navajo Nation:

• Ben Shelly, President

• Martha Shelly, First Lady

• Michele Morris, Executive Staff Assistant, Office of the President and Vice President (OPVP)

• Erny Zah, Communications Director, OPVP

• Arnold Silversmith, Executive Protection Service, OPVP

• Steve Etsitty, Executive Director, Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency (NNEPA)

• Eugenia Quintana, Director, NNEPA-Air & Toxics Department

• Anoop Sumukaran, Environmental Engineer, NNEPA-AQCP

• Bill Johnson, NN-Department of Justice

Attendees from EPA

• Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator

• Zoe Heller, Special Assistant, Office of the Regional Administrator

• Colleen McKaughan, Associate Director, Air Division

• Nate Lau, Associate Director, Communities and Ecosystem Division

• Ann Lyons, Office of Regional Counsel

• Anita Lee, Air Division

• Pamela Overman, Communities and Ecosystem Division
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ames True Temper, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Richard Dell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                      
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Richard Dell
Richard Dell
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
February 12, 2008

---
Case No. 14-08061-362 

In re Order of Foreclosure § In the District Court 

Concerning 5188 Mohegan Lane § 

Frisco, TX 75034 § 

Under TRCP 736 § 362nd Judicial District 

 § 

 § 

 § Denton County, Texas 

_________________________________________________

NOTICE OF APPEAL

__________________________________________________

 Notice is hereby given that Respondents in the above captioned action, hereby 

appeal this Court's Home Equity Foreclosure Order granting Petitioner’s foreclosure 

application, entered on February 19, 2015. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Eric G. Calhoun 

 ERIC G. CALHOUN 

 Texas Bar No. 03638800 

 CALHOUN & ASSOCIATES 

1595 N. Central Expressway 

Richardson, Texas 75080 

(214) 766-8100 Telephone 

(214) 308-1947 Facsimile 

eric@ecalhounlaw.com 

COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify on this 23rd day of March, 2015, that counsel of record will be 

served with a copy of this document via email via the ProDoc e-filing system pursuant to 

the local rules of this Court. 

/s/ Eric G. Calhoun 

 ERIC G. CALHOUN 

FILED: 3/23/2015 2:55:11 PM

SHERRI ADELSTEIN

Denton County District Clerk

By: Joanna Price, Deputy

ACCEPTED

02-15-00105-CV

SECOND COURT OF APPEALS

FORT WORTH, TEXAS

4/9/2015 2:38:29 PM

DEBRA SPISAK

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 2nd COURT OF APPEALS FORT WORTH, TEXAS 04/09/2015 2:38:29 PM DEBRA SPISAK Clerk
**USDA Hemp Comments**

**Opening**

Colorado is and will continue to be, a leader in hemp production.

We have realized the benefits of hemp and embraced the crop as an economic driver for the state. It has attracted scientists, investors, and entrepreneurs who have devoted their time and resources to advance the industry. 

Since the passage of the 2014 Farm Bill through 2017, Colorado accounted for more than half of the nation’s industrial hemp production. As of 2018, Colorado is home to 835 licensed producers, 1,200 registered land areas, and over 31,000 outdoor and 110 indoor acres of licensed cultivation space. We also launched the first certified hemp seed program in the US and hired the first official Industrial Hemp Certified Seed Specialist in the country to give growers greater confidence in the quality of their seeds.

With the passage of the 2018 Farm Bill, a number of issues that impact American farmers remain to be addressed at the federal level.  

**Regulatory framework suggestions**

- We need clear direction from the USDA as to how to proceed in order to provide certainty to the industry and create a level playing field for all states.

We must create standardized protocols for the collection and analysis of hemp samples.  Disparities in sample preparation and analysis marginalizes test results, resulting in material that is non-compliant in one state becoming a marketable commodity in another state. 

We need nationally accepted transportation solutions for the smooth movement of hemp and hemp products.  Law enforcement and state agencies need to work together efficiently.

A certified seed system that addresses normal certified seed production plus THC level must be developed and enforced on a national level.  Enforcing the federal seed law is increasingly important.

Hemp producers need equal access to agricultural financial services.

Federal grant matching funds should be made available to increase research, development, and processing.

The hemp industry will see an increase in grain production for human and animal consumption and regulations will need to reflect that.

FDA rulings should recognize hemp and its derived products as safe and acceptable in the market and should work to validate label claims of CBD products.

**Conclusion**

Colorado has more businesses in the hemp economy than any other state. From university research to farm equipment manufacturing to biotech firms, we’re all in on hemp.  We are excited to work closely with stakeholders across the US to treat hemp as any other agriculture crop and find business and consumer-friendly regulatory solutions.
Order entered April 10, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00713-CR

No. 05-14-00714-CR

No. 05-14-00715-CR

MICHAEL DAN ALLEN JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 366-81546-2013, 366-81547-2013, 366-81548-2013

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeals.

On January 20, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why 

appellant’s brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to 

pursue the appeals; (2) appellant is indigent; (3) Brock Duke was originally appointed to 

represent appellant, but later William Schultz was appointed as appellant’s counsel; (4) the 

change in counsel was not sent to this Court, nor did Mr. Schultz receive notices from this Court 

or copies of the record; (5) Hannah Stroud has now been appointed to represent appellant; and 

(6) Ms. Stroud indicated she would need about forty-five days to prepare appellant’s brief.
We DIRECT the Clerk to list Hannah Stroud as appellant’s attorney of record in place of 

Brock Duke.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief within FORTY-FIVE DAYS of the date of this 

order.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                      WHITE ELECTRONIC DESIGNS CORPORATION
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of White Electronic Designs Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended September 28, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Hamid R. Shokrgozar, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to the U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

                                                         /s/ Hamid R. Shokrgozar
                                                         -----------------------
                                                             Hamid R. Shokrgozar

                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                               December 20, 2002
<TABLE>
                                                             Exhibit 12.2



                             Boston Edison Company
               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                   and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements
                         Year ended December 31, 1998
                                (in thousands)


<S>                                                    <C>
Net income from continuing operations                  $157,337

Income taxes                                             82,639

Fixed charges                                           100,898
                                                       --------

     Total                                             $340,874
                                                       ========

Interest expense                                       $ 91,114
Interest component of rentals                             9,784
                                                       --------

     Subtotal                                          $100,898
                                                       --------

Preferred stock dividend requirements                    13,361
                                                       --------

     Total                                             $114,259
                                                       ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and
preferred stock dividend requirements                      2.98
                                                           ====
</TABLE>
Exhibit 11.0

 

KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

STATEMENTS RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data, Unaudited)

 

 

|                                                                                     |   | **Three Months Ended** |   | **Six Months Ended**  |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|--------|-----------------------|--------|
|                                                                                     |   | **December 31, 2008**  |   | **December 31, 2008** |   |
|                                                                                     |   |                   |   |                  |   |   |   |
|                                                                                     |   |                   |   |                  |   |   |   |
| Income available to common stockholders                                                  |   | $                      | 2,238  |                  | $      | 3,974 |   |
|                                                                                     |   |                   |   |                  |   |   |   |
| Weighted average shares outstanding                                                      |   |                   | 68,190 |                  |   | 68,322 |   |
|                                                                                     |   |                   |   |                  |   |   |   |
| Basic earnings per share                                                                 |   | $                      | 0.03   |                  | $      | 0.06 |   |
|                                                                                     |   |                   |   |                  |   |   |   |
| Income for diluted earnings per share                                                    |   | $                      | 2,238  |                  | $      | 3,974 |   |
|                                                                                     |   |                   |   |                  |   |   |   |
| Total weighted average common shares and equivalents outstanding for diluted computation |   |                   | 68,316 |                  |   | 68,481 |   |
|                                                                                     |   |                   |   |                  |   |   |   |
| Diluted earnings per share                                                               |   | $                      | 0.03   |                  | $      | 0.06 |   |
|                                                                                     |   |                   |   |                  |   |   |   |
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bar Association Members/State Street Collective
Trust (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert E. Fullam, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Robert E. FullamRobert E. FullamChief Financial OfficerAugust 14, 2008
FEE TABLE – UNITED STATES WAREHOUSE ACT (Effective 10/1/2019) 

GRAIN

License 

Action 

Fee 

Service 

License 

Fee 

Inspection 

Fee 

Annual User Fees 

Licensed Capacities 

(in bushels) 

Annual fee for 

each warehouse 

location with a 

CCC storage 

agreement 

Annual fee for 

each warehouse 

location 

without a CCC 

storage 

agreement 

$ 90 $40 $19 for each 

10,000 

bushels 

MIN $ 190 

MAX $1900 

1 - 150,000 $ 170 $ 340 

150,001 - 250,000 340 680 

250,001 - 500,000 500 1,000 

500,001 - 750,000 675 1,350 

750,001 - 1,000,000 840 1,680 

1,000,001 - 1,200,000 1,010 2,020 

1,200,001 - 1,500,000 1,180 2,360 

1,500,001 - 2,000,000 1,340 2,680 

2,000,001 - 2,500,000 1,515 3,030 

2,500,001 - 5,000,000 1,680 3,360 

5,000,001 - 7,500,000 1,855 3,710 

7,500,001 -10,000,000 2,025 4,050 

10,000,001+ *2,025 **4,050 

* Plus $55 per million bushels above 10,000,000, or fraction 

thereof. 

** Plus $105 per million bushels above 10,000,000, or 

fraction thereof.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CB Richard Ellis Realty Trust (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “ Report “), I, Laurie Romanak, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company. 

 

August 14, 2007 

 

39
c

•

YDafnh o^^.oizl/y

Trip.

. - . J/^ CZ £)(^Gf^<s/6A^ f)/^

/A^^hiOjh /d //Jt <:Jjs fQi//iu} //O /DL/f

dAS^ 0(A.i ^/ iVy6 /^na^i ZW/i/^ ,1//^/wP/y(k .

. y7)u. fp.hM/u)< /jdn^ rJpJjf^^ ^aS /'J^h 6^ yyjard'/? / (^ Vs" ' <^- - y .. .^ _ .

JT' J/c/<pj/ r^fiJo'-C /l)(}>^/C'0 /ylJ/z / C^6? ^>' dM dl^ /nay^iH/? -

.<Sd/yifj /a-^e/. /^kh X/^ aJ^/k/- A/sc/ ca. r:/A<r.(i'^<27/AA^/^

.r^d/lud.. /JdU haiJe Odpu s/' Miff

,-^toJ r/Jht, /

"Th^JU (J/I^i

n

fyTA )&,/ T^//S^/?:yKiiM%a2'3/(i

RECEIVED IN =a^ ^ r COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 3 TIAPR 02 2015

FILED IN

r^O! •rT( fumimwal APPEAL. ^belAcosta,Clerk

APR 13 2015

M

•'

w
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1065 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1065

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide for a study on the use of social media in security clearance 
                            investigations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Media Use in Clearance 
Investigations Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. STUDY ON USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN SECURITY CLEARANCE 
              INVESTIGATIONS.

    Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall submit to 
Congress a report on the examination of social media activity during 
security clearance investigations, including--
            (1) the current use of publicly available social media in 
        security clearance background investigations;
            (2) any legal impediments to examining publicly available 
        social media activity, and whether those impediments are 
        statutory or regulatory in nature;
            (3) the results of any pilot programs to incorporate social 
        media checks in such investigations, including the 
        effectiveness and cost of such programs;
            (4) options for widespread implementation of the 
        examination of social media activity during such 
        investigations; and
            (5) estimates on the cost for such options as part of--
                    (A) all Top Secret investigations; or
                    (B) all Secret and Top Secret investigations.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 11, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1065

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To provide for a study on the use of social media in security clearance 
                            investigations.
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.20
 FORM OF PERFORMANCE SHARE AWARD AGREEMENT
WHITE ELECTRONIC DESIGNS CORPORATION
1994 FLEXIBLE STOCK PLAN  (Form of Performance Based Award)
 
 A.
 B.
 C.
  Grant of Performance Shares
 Vesting of Performance Shares




---



##### 



Number of PerformanceShares Vested
    
    Performance Criteria[___%]
    
    Company achieves an annual EBITDA
___% greater than 100% of the FY20___
target, which EBITDA shall be ___,
(the Performance Target) in either
FY20___ or FY20___.[___%]
    
    Company achieves an annual EBITDA
equal to or greater than ___% of the
Performance Target (which EBITDA
shall be ___) but less than 100% of
the Performance Target, in either
FY20___ or FY20___.
 provided however
 
  Termination of Employment
 2




---



##### 



Time and Form of Payment
 Nontransferability
 Adjustments
 Delivery of Shares
 Securities Act
 Voting and Other Stockholder Related Rights e.g.
 3




---



##### 



Copy of Plan
 Administration
 Continuation of Employment
 Tax Withholding
 Governing Law
 Amendments
 4




---



##### 



WHITE ELECTRONIC DESIGNS CORPORATIONBy:By: 5
Exhibit 31.01

I, Herbert C. Hofmann, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bulova Corporation;

  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

  4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
     to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
     its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
     and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
     most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
     case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
     likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
     financial reporting; and

  5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting.


Dated:  March 19, 2004                             By  /s/ Herbert C. Hofmann
                                                       -----------------------
                                                       HERBERT C. HOFMANN
                                                       Chief Executive Officer