Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 221 / Friday, November 15, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 68699 

not incorporated by reference in this AD, 

pertain to the subject of this AD and can be 

obtained from Turbomeca, using the contact 

information in paragraph (i)(4) of this AD. 

(4) For Turbomeca service information 

identified in this AD, contact Turbomeca, 

40220 Tarnos, France; phone: 33 (0)5 59 74 

40 00; telex: 570 042; fax: 33 (0)5 59 74 45 

15. 

(j) Material Incorporated by Reference 

None. 

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on 

October 24, 2013. 

Colleen M. D’Alessandro, 

Assistant Directorate Manager, Engine & 

Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2013–27185 Filed 11–14–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket FAA No. FAA–2013–0530; Airspace 

Docket No. 13–AWP–9] 

Establishment of Class E Airspace; 

Battle Mountain, NV 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: This action corrects a final 

rule published in the Federal Register 

of September 23, 2013, that establishes 

Class E airspace at the Battle Mountain 

VHF Omni-Directional Radio Range 

Tactical Air Navigational Aid 

(VORTAC) navigation aid, Battle 

Mountain, NV. A favorable comment 

from the National Business Aviation 

Association (NBAA) was received in the 

public Docket but was not referenced in 

the Final Rule. 

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, 

December 12, 2013. The Director of the 

Federal Register approves this 

incorporation by reference action under 

1 CFR Part 51, subject to the annual 

revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and 

publication of conforming amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Operations Support 

Group, Western Service Center, 1601 

Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; 

telephone (425) 203–4537. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

The FAA published a final rule in the 

Federal Register establishing Class E 

airspace at the Battle Mountain 

VORTAC navigation aid, Battle 

Mountain, NV (78 FR 58159, September 

23, 2013). The FAA received a comment 

in support of the rule from the NBAA 

for inclusion in FAA Docket No. FAA– 

2013–0530 prior to the closing of the 

comment period. However, the 

preamble incorrectly references that 

there were no comments to the 

proposal. This action corrects that 

statement. 

Correction to Final Rule 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, the 

description under the History heading, 

as published in the Federal Register on 

September 23, 2013 (78 FR 58159), 

Airspace Docket No. 13–AWP–9, FR 

Doc. 2013–58159, is corrected as 

follows: On page 58160, column 1, line 

2, remove ‘‘No comments were 

received.’’, and add in their place ‘‘One 

comment was received from the 

National Business Aviation Association 

(NBAA) supporting the establishment of 

Class E en route airspace.’’. 

Issued in Seattle, Washington, on: 

November 6, 2013. 

Clark Desing, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, Western 

Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2013–27217 Filed 11–14–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 95 

[Docket No. 30931; Amdt. No. 510] 

IFR Altitudes; Miscellaneous 

Amendments 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule 

SUMMARY: This amendment adopts 

miscellaneous amendments to the 

required IFR (instrument flight rules) 

altitudes and changeover points for 

certain Federal airways, jet routes, or 

direct routes for which a minimum or 

maximum en route authorized IFR 

altitude is prescribed. This regulatory 

action is needed because of changes 

occurring in the National Airspace 

System. These changes are designed to 

provide for the safe and efficient use of 

the navigable airspace under instrument 

conditions in the affected areas. 

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, December 

12, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Harry Hodges, Flight Procedure 

Standards Branch (AMCAFS–420), 

Flight Technologies and Programs 

Division, Flight Standards Service, 

Federal Aviation Administration, Mike 

Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 

South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, 

OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 

25082 Oklahoma City, OK 73125) 

telephone: (405) 954–4164. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

amendment to part 95 of the Federal 

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 95) 

amends, suspends, or revokes IFR 

altitudes governing the operation of all 

aircraft in flight over a specified route 

or any portion of that route, as well as 

the changeover points (COPs) for 

Federal airways, jet routes, or direct 

routes as prescribed in part 95. 

The Rule 

The specified IFR altitudes, when 

used in conjunction with the prescribed 

changeover points for those routes, 

ensure navigation aid coverage that is 

adequate for safe flight operations and 

free of frequency interference. The 

reasons and circumstances that create 

the need for this amendment involve 

matters of flight safety and operational 

efficiency in the National Airspace 

System, are related to published 

aeronautical charts that are essential to 

the user, and provide for the safe and 

efficient use of the navigable airspace. 

In addition, those various reasons or 

circumstances require making this 

amendment effective before the next 

scheduled charting and publication date 

of the flight information to assure its 

timely availability to the user. The 

effective date of this amendment reflects 

those considerations. In view of the 

close and immediate relationship 

between these regulatory changes and 

safety in air commerce, I find that notice 

and public procedure before adopting 

this amendment are impracticable and 

contrary to the public interest and that 

good cause exists for making the 

amendment effective in less than 30 

days. 

Conclusion 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. It, therefore—(1) is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a 

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. For the same 

reason, the FAA certifies that this 

amendment will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES