Formal Recommendation 

From: National Organic Standards Board (NOSB)

To: the National Organic Program (NOP)

Date: April 30, 2021

Subject: Paper Based Crop Planting Aids

NOSB Chair: Steve Ela

The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: 

Rulemaking Action: X

Statement of the Recommendation: 

The NOSB classified paper-based crop planting aids as synthetic and made two listing motions: One 

motion to add a definition for Paper-based crop planting aid, to §205.2 Terms Defined (see below for full 

definition), and a motion to add to §205.601 (p) Production Aids: Paper-based crop planting aids as 

defined in §205.2. Virgin or recycled paper without glossy paper or colored inks.

Rationale Supporting Recommendation:

The Board has reviewed several proposals for paper-based crop planting aids and in each case the 

comments received during the public comment process resulted in the proposals being returned to the 

Crops Subcommittee for further work. The Crops Subcommittee has developed the definition and 

annotation described in the proposal to provide a practical and achievable material for manufacturers to 

produce and for organic farmers to use. The material is a planting aid and the intent is to limit the use of 

this material to activities around planting of seeds or plants. See the full proposal below for justification 

behind the NOSB’s recommendation for percentages of cellulose and biobased requirements, allowance 

for virgin paper, and prohibition of glossy paper or colored inks.

The proposal for paper-based crop planting aids elicited numerous comments about the critical need for 

these materials to support smaller organic growers. While hand planting, machine planting, and other 

methods may provide some alternatives to paper planting aids, these types of aids fill specific niches 

that alternatives do not. The Board found that paper-based crop planting aids complied with the OFPA 

criteria for minimal environmental damage. They also enhance human health for small growers by 

eliminating the often back-breaking work of transplanting very small seedlings. A system of organic 

agriculture is enhanced by these aids since they allow a certain segment of small growers to participate 

in organic certification. These growers often direct market and provide a ready means of local organic 

produce to their markets, and are invested in maintaining a healthy ecosystem.

Public comments submitted at the Spring 2021 meeting included suggestions for additional changes. 

The NOSB approved a proposal without these suggested changes. A summary of the comments is 

included below:

• the addition of the words “typically in paper,” to the proposed 205.2 Terms Defined

• including a requirement for continuous improvement. It was suggested to add something 

similar to the listing at §205.204 Seeds and planting stock practice standard, which allows for 

the use of nonorganically produced, untreated seeds and planting stock when “an equivalent 
organically produced variety is not commercially available.” Not only would a listing similar to 

this apply the commercial availability statement, but it could allow for variances based on 

functionality.

• specifically noting that the percentages in the definition should always be calculated by weight 

and questioning whether water would be included in these weights – a revised definition was 

suggested reading: “Paper-based crop planting aid. A tool, including but not limited to, pots, 

seed tapes, and plant collars (but not including biodegradable mulch films) that is placed in or 

on the soil and later incorporated into the soil. Contents must be comprised of at least 60%, by 

weight, of cellulose-based fiber. Up to 40% of ingredients, by weight, may be comprised of: nonsynthetic materials; synthetic plant or soil amendments permitted under §205.601(j); and/or 

synthetic fibers, adhesives, and/or resins used to strengthen the product. Total content must 

not be less than 80% biobased, by weight, as verified by a qualified third-party assessment (e.g. 

laboratory test using ASTM D6866 or composition review by qualified personnel).” Calculating 

water: How would water be calculated in the percentages of contents? Would it be excluded 

from the calculations, similar to calculating percentages in processed foods? Or would water be 

considered as part of the product’s non-synthetic components?

• enumerate specific standards/methods by which biobased content is to be verified by qualified 

personnel other than an ASTM D6866 laboratory result

• “Paper-based crop planting aids” should be listed as a subsection of §205.601 (o), which is the 

subsection that is actually titled “Production Aids.” The Subcommittee’s intent was not clear 

because §205.601 (p) is currently designated as “Reserved,” while it is §205.601 (o) that is 

currently titled “Production Aids.”

• For clarity in listing, language needs modified in §205.601: In accordance with restrictions 

specified in this section, the following synthetic substances may be used in organic crop 

production: Provided, That, use of such substances do not contribute to contamination of crops, 

soil, or water. Substances allowed by this section, except disinfectants and sanitizers in 

paragraph (a) and those substances in paragraphs (c), (j), (k) (l), (n),(o) and (p) of this section, 

may only be used when the provisions set forth in §205.206(a) through (d) prove insufficient to 

prevent or control the target pest. 

Many commentors expressed the need for some biodegradability standard in this proposal, however, 

the wording of such a standard could not be agreed upon. There was also concern that the time and 

cost of testing to a biodegradability standard would inhibit innovation to move to a 100% biobased 

product. The NOSB wants to make sure that these materials are promptly and economically available to 

growers of all sizes. The NOSB encourages testing and trials of increased natural and/or biobased 

contents and believes that manufacturers would be less likely to provide small innovations if this testing 

were required. 

The NOSB was unable to develop a definition based on synthetic vs. non-synthetic materials, since paper 

itself is synthetic. Furthermore, cellulose and biobased materials that do not break down in the 

environment can be manufactured, while others are biodegradable. The definition included in the 

recommendation is a compromise, widely accepted by stakeholders. 

The NOSB found that while some synthetic adhesives or fibers could be used based on the language of 

this listing, the quantity applied to soils would be negligible and would likely be much less than would be 

applied through the allowed use of newspaper. The recommendation also includes verbiage specifically 

excluding biodegradable plastic mulch, to allay concerns about its potential use. 
NOSB Vote: 

Classification Motion: 

Motion to classify paper-based crop planting aid as a synthetic substance. 

Motion by: Steve Ela 

Seconded by: Jerry D’Amore 

Yes: 14 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Recuse: 0

Listing Motions

Motion to add to 205.2 Terms Defined: Paper-based crop planting aid. A material that is comprised 

of at least 60% cellulose-based fiber by weight, including, but not limited to, pots, seed tape, and 

collars that are placed in or on the soil and later incorporated into the soil, excluding biodegradable 

mulch film. Up to 40% of the ingredients can be non-synthetic, other permitted synthetic 

ingredients at §205.601(j), or synthetic strengthening fibers, adhesives, or resins. Contains no less 

than 80% biobased content as verified by a qualified third-party assessment (e.g. laboratory test 

using ASTM D6866 or composition review by qualified personnel). Added nutrients must comply 

with §205.105, 205.203, and 205.206. 

Motion by: Steve Ela 

Seconded by: Rick Greenwood 

Yes: 14 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Recuse: 0

Motion to add to 205.601 (p) Production Aids: Paper-based crop planting aids as defined in 205.2. 

Virgin or recycled paper without glossy paper or colored inks. 

Motion by: Steve Ela 

Seconded by: Emily Oakley

Yes: 14 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Recuse: 0

 

Motions Passed
National Organic Standards Board

Crops Subcommittee Petitioned Material Proposal

Paper Based Crop Planting Aids

January 19, 2021

Summary of Petition and Petition Addendum for Paper (Plant Pots and Containers)

The NOSB received a petition in August 2018 for the addition of paper planting pots to the National List: 

§ 205.601(o) production aids- Plant pot or growing container-hemp or other paper, without glossy or 

colored inks. 

This material has not been petitioned for inclusion on the National List in the past. However, paper 

chain pots have historically been allowed for the past 12 years by some organic certification agencies, 

under the allowance for “Newspaper or Other Recycled Paper as a mulch or compost feedstock”. 

In February 2018, the NOP notified all certifiers that paper chain pots are not allowed in organic 

systems. However, because some certifiers had previously approved their use, NOP allowed a phase-out 

period until the end of the 2018 crop season. The NOP’s decision on this material was based primarily 

on the presence of an unapproved synthetic adhesive in the product and the use of virgin paper. 

Further, the current allowance for paper on the National List does not extend to the use associated with 

paper pots. At the October 2018 and April 2019 NOSB meetings, there were numerous oral and written 

public comments requesting a longer time period allowing use of these paper pots while the NOSB 

reviewed the petition. The NOSB also formally requested this extension in November 2018. The NOP 

agreed to allow the use of paper pots in organic agriculture in late Fall 2018, with no time restriction, to

give the NOSB time to go through the review process of this material. 

Paper pots are used by small scale farming operations to efficiently transplant using a non-motorized 

machine transplanting system. More information on this transplanting method can be found on these 

websites: http://paper-pot.com/ and http://www.smallfarmworks.com/. This equipment, along with 

the paper pots, is imported from a manufacturer in Japan. According to the petition, the Nitten paper 

pot chain system uses paper, produced from a non-bleached Kraft pulp, and adhesives. Non-paper 

synthetic fibers have been used in small quantities (15%) in the paper pots, but these fibers are 

proposed to be replaced by a natural hemp fiber. The petitioner and public comment at the Spring and 

Fall 2018 NOSB meetings stated this system is unique and essential for smaller scale growers. The only 

alternative would be the much slower and more costly hand planting of individual plants. The system is 

used for closely spaced crops such as onions, beets, baby salad, etc. The petition states that, like 

newspaper, these pots decompose in the soil readily. At the time of this proposal, the first trial replacing 

the synthetic fibers with hemp fibers was not successful, and a second trial was in process.

In addition to the paper pots indicated in the petition, there are numerous other paper pot systems, 

both to be used to transplant single plants as well as in chains. In addition to paper, these other paper 

pot systems have various percentages of non-paper synthetic fibers, which may or may not be biobased. 

Paper pots can also include other ingredients, such as cow manure, synthetic antimicrobials, fungicides, 

and fertilizers. Public comment from another manufacturer based in Denmark, Ellepot 

(https://www.ellepot.com/), provided further information on non-chain paper pots for a variety of uses 

from fast maturing annuals to long term woody perennial crops. The percentage of cellulose based 

synthetic fibers in their paper pots can be 20-100%. Synthetic adhesives are currently the only synthetic 

material used in the Ellepots other than the paper itself. 

NOSB Proposals and Discussion Documents April 2021 9 of 172
The petition states that, in addition to information on paper, the TR on newspaper addresses the 

presence of adhesives and synthetic fibers in recycled newspaper as well. The three adhesives in the 

Nitten paper chain pots are vinyl-acetate resin (water soluble and stated to be leached from the pots 

before transplanting), ethylene-vinyl-acetate resin, and acrylic acid ester copolymer. 

It should be noted that paper itself is a synthetic fiber due to the manufacturing process. However, for 

the purposes of this discussion, a distinction is made between synthetic paper fibers and synthetic fibers 

that are not strictly paper. These non-paper synthetic fibers can be biobased and made from cellulose 

or they can be non-biobased and made from several other materials such as petroleum-based plastics. 

Additionally, some synthetic cellulose-based materials may not be biodegradable. In general, many of 

the biobased, cellulose derived synthetic fibers used in paper pots are expected to biodegrade whereas 

the same might not be true of other petroleum-based fibers. Thus, it can be important to distinguish 

not only between synthetic paper fibers and other non-paper synthetic fibers but also between whether 

fibers from any source are biodegradable (as referenced to some recognized standard) or might persist 

in the soil.

The Crops Subcommittee has viewed paper pots, used as a crop production aid, as another use of paper 

beyond compost feedstocks and mulch, which are allowed under the NOP regulation. However, in order 

to do due diligence, the Crops Subcommittee requested a Technical Review (TR) to help identify the 

adhesives and synthetic fibers used in paper pots and identify if there are any that would not be present 

in the already allowed paper used in compost and mulch. Pots, compost, and mulch all degrade into the 

soil, and the Subcommittee believes if the fibers and adhesives are allowed in the other listings for 

paper, then their use in pots should be allowed as well.

The Technical Review clarified that the adhesives and non-paper synthetic fibers found in a variety of 

paper pots are also found in newspaper and recycled paper that are allowed for compost feedstock and 

mulch. Other possible adhesives and synthetic fibers for paper pots that were not mentioned in the 

petition are described in the TR.

Summary of Public Comment: 

Many users of the paper pot chain system provided written and verbal comment to the NOSB at the Fall 

2018 through Fall 2020 public meetings. They spoke in favor of its use due to its efficiency in 

transplanting at a small-scale level. Some certifiers spoke in favor of this material and noted that if the 

paper was torn off the pot before transplanting, it would then be allowed as a mulch or as a compost 

feedstock under our current regulation. Certifiers who had not allowed the use of these paper pots still 

supported the extended allowance for use while the NOSB performed its review. 

There is more than one supplier of paper pots beyond the supplier noted in the petition. Approval of this 

material will open the door for other manufacturers to produce these pots once there is clarity on what 

would be allowed under the organic regulations. Paper pots can be made with all-natural fibers or with 

a mixture of synthetic and natural fibers. The pots with higher non-paper, synthetic fiber contents are 

more typically used in the nursery trade where perennial plants may be in the pots for 9-12 months 

before transplanting into the field. Natural fiber pots can, at times, be sufficient for use in transplanting 

annual vegetable and flower plants, depending on the time frame from planting into the pot to planting 

in the field and if the pots need extra strength for a “chain of pots” planting system. All the paper pots 

contain some type of synthetic adhesive, but these same adhesives are also found on recycled paper 

which is already allowed in organic agriculture.

NOSB Proposals and Discussion Documents April 2021 10 of 172
Numerous commenters mentioned that all uses of paper as production aids should be included when 

the NOSB does its review for paper pots. Cloches or hot caps, seed tape, and cutworm prevention 

collars are other examples of production aids made from paper and typical paper adhesives. 

There were also a number of comments about whether the listing for paper pots should be expanded to 

include additional distinct uses of paper as a production aid. Many commenters favored a listing that 

extended beyond only paper pots to include, but not be limited to, items such as seed tape, and other 

materials with direct soil contact. However, commenters also wanted to make sure that there was a 

differentiation between paper materials being used that are later incorporated into the soil versus paper 

materials that are intended to be removed after use. The Crops Subcommittee has narrowed the use 

from a “production aid” to a “planting aid” to limit the use of this paper to that period of the crop 

production, and to those aids that would be incorporated into the soil.

Comments submitted during both Spring and Fall 2020 meetings asked for further refinement of the 

definition and annotation for paper planting aids. These comments included the inclusion of nutrient 

and pesticide limitations, restricting the potential use of biodegradable biobased mulch under this

definition, clarification of the makeup of the 40% of the products that are not cellulose based and who 

would qualify as a third party reviewer for biobased or cellulose based content.

Specific Uses of the Substance:

Paper pots are either single or in chains to allow for “mechanical” transplanting, either with a hand 

driven machine or with a tractor implement. The paper pots decompose into the soil and lessen 

transplant shock since the roots are not exposed to the air before transplanting like plants being 

removed from plastic pots. The use of paper pots can contribute to less use of plastic in the produce 

industry. Growers can also use soil blocks, which are compressed soil without any container, to grow 

transplants.

Other paper crop production aids include: cloches (a temporary covering used to protect newly 

transplanted plants), seed tape (where individual seed is spaced correctly on a paper tape which lessens 

the need for thinning), and collars to prevent cutworm damage to plants at the soil line. There could be 

other uses of paper currently used as crop production aids or there may be other uses developed over 

time. The composition of the paper allowed in paper pots and other planting aids, as well as the 

adhesives approved, would meet the manufacturer needs of these other paper planting aids.

Approved Legal Uses of the Substance:

Newspaper and recycled paper are allowed under the organic regulations in these two references: 

Reference: 205.601(b) As herbicides, weed barriers, as applicable. (2) Mulches. (i) newspapers or other 

recycled paper, without glossy or colored inks. 

Reference: 205.601(c) - As compost feedstocks - Newspapers or other recycled paper, without glossy or 

colored inks. 

There have been three technical reports (TRs) for Newspaper, in 1995, 2006 and 2017, which can be 

found here: https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/organic/national-list/n. 

NOP guidance 5034-1 “Materials for Organic Crop Production” from December 2016 excludes virgin 

paper from the “newspaper or other recycled paper” allowance for mulch or compost feed stocks. The 

NOSB Proposals and Discussion Documents April 2021 11 of 172
guidance states: “Includes newspaper and other recycled paper such as cardboard, without glossy or 

colored inks. Does not include paper that is not recycled (i.e., virgin paper).”

The July 2019 Technical Review of Paper Pots and Containers, detailing the specific possible synthetic 

and natural fibers as well as synthetic adhesives found in paper pots currently commercially available, 

provided more clarity for the NOSB.

Manufacture:

Paper can be made from various plant sources including wood, trees, straw, hemp, bamboo, reeds, 

kenaf, sisal, jute, sugarcane bagasse, sunflower stalks as well as recycled sources of pulp. Cellulose 

sources are typically mechanically ground and then chemically “cooked” using an alkali or sulfite 

process. Newspaper and recycled papers can also have a variety of inks, although colored ink and glossy 

paper are not allowed as compost feedstocks or mulch under the organic rule. The paper used as a 

planting aid could include the typical adhesives found in newspaper and recycled paper.

Subcommittee Discussion:

The Crops Subcommittee has reviewed the petition, technical reviews, and public comments and has 

developed a listing and annotation that we believe meets the needs of producers while addressing 

environmental concerns that might be associated with some types of paper. When discussing the 

possible allowance for paper used as a planting aid, the Subcommittee also considered the fact that 

currently there is an allowance for “newspaper or other recycled paper” as weed control or as compost 

feed stocks and there are very few differences between the currently allowed paper and the paper as a 

planting aid under review, with the exception of paper pots that have a very high percentage of noncellulose synthetic fibers. Requiring 60% cellulose fiber prevents the planting aids from being 

completely made of biobased, non-degradable plastics and yet allows current products on the market. 

It is hoped that this percentage can increase over time. Requiring 80% biobased content prevents the 

use of planting aids made primarily from petroleum sources and also allows the products currently on 

the market. Again, it is hoped that this percentage can be increased over time and that future Boards 

will be able to modify this annotation to reflect manufacturing technological advances that incorporate 

more natural materials and additional cellulose and biobased content. These future reviews should also 

encompass the biodegradability of both fibers and adhesives.

Small changes have been made to the annotation to reflect concerns from stakeholders. 

• There was concern that the annotation specifically notes that allowed paper planting aids are 

not limited to those listed and that the materials will be incorporated into the soil (without 

reference of intent to biodegrade).

• As pointed out in public comment, the wording that allows the use of newspaper “without 

colored or glossy inks” was intended to prevent use of glossy paper and colored inks and the 

wording for paper planting aids is changed to prevent the use of glossy paper or colored inks.

• Stakeholders had asked for language regarding nutrient and pesticide inclusions in the paper 

planting aids to prevent the use of materials not allowed on the National List. However, later 

comments noted that the inclusion of pesticide language runs counter to the legal use of 

pesticides, so that language was removed.

• Concern was expressed by stakeholders about substances that might be included in the 40% 

non-cellulose portion of the paper planting aids. They suggested language limiting those 

materials and specifying what their uses might be. That language has been added to the 

definition. 

NOSB Proposals and Discussion Documents April 2021 12 of 172
• For clarity in listing, language needs modified in §205.601: In accordance with restrictions 

specified in this section, the following synthetic substances may be used in organic crop 

production: Provided, That, use of such substances do not contribute to contamination of crops, 

soil, or water. Substances allowed by this section, except disinfectants and sanitizers in 

paragraph (a) and those substances in paragraphs (c), (j), (k) (l), (n),(o) and (p) of this section, 

may only be used when the provisions set forth in §205.206(a) through (d) prove insufficient to 

prevent or control the target pest.

The Board acknowledges that the percentage specificities in this listing should be reviewed by future 

Boards as technology and materials change. It seems likely that there will continue to be advances in 

fiber types that can be used in these paper planting aids. If so, the percentage of cellulose or biobased 

materials could be increased. It is hoped that at some point in the future this listing could be changed to 

100% biobased, biodegradable fiber content as well as examining adhesives to address biodegradability.

Category 1: Classification 

1. For CROP use: Is the substance _____ Non-synthetic or __x__ Synthetic? 

Is the substance formulated or manufactured by a process that chemically changes a substance 

extracted from naturally occurring plant, animal, or mineral sources? [OFPA §6502(21)] If so, 

describe, using NOP 5033-1 as a guide.

Due to the paper pulping production process and use of synthetic adhesives, this material is 

considered to be synthetic.

2. For CROPS: Reference to appropriate OFPA category:

Is the substance used in production, and does it contain an active synthetic ingredient in the 

following categories: [§6517(c)(1)(B)(i)]; copper and sulfur compounds; toxins derived from 

bacteria; pheromones, soaps, horticultural oils, fish emulsions, treated seed, vitamins and 

minerals; livestock parasiticides and medicines and production aids including netting, tree wraps 

and seals, insect traps, sticky barriers, row covers, and equipment cleansers; or (ii) is used in 

production and contains synthetic inert ingredients that are not classified by the Administrator of 

the Environmental Protection Agency as inerts of toxicological concern?

This material is considered a crop planting aid and is not a pesticide. Although some paper pots 

available on the market might have prohibited pesticides (insecticides, antimicrobials, fungicides 

etc.) embedded in the fiber, these would not be allowed in organic production. To be explicit, 

the annotation states that any added nutrients must conform to the National List or be allowed 

under OFPA. Additionally, the non-cellulose based content is expressly limited to non-synthetic 

materials, other permitted synthetic ingredients at §205.601(j), or synthetic strengthening 

fibers, adhesives, or resins.

Category 2: Adverse Impacts 

1. What is the potential for the substance to have detrimental chemical interactions with other 

materials used in organic farming systems? [§6518(m)(1)]

Most of the paper used as a crop planting aid is functionally identical to newspaper and recycled 

paper. The current listing of newspaper and recycled paper has been found to have no 

detrimental interactions with other materials in organic agriculture.

NOSB Proposals and Discussion Documents April 2021 13 of 172
2. What is the toxicity and mode of action of the substance and of its breakdown products or any 

contaminants, and their persistence and areas of concentration in the environment? 

[§6518(m)(2)]

No toxicity or negative mode of action has been found in the breakdown of paper (cellulose) in 

the environment. No colored inks or glossy paper would be allowed for paper as a crop planting 

aid, similar to paper as it is currently annotated as a compost feedstock and/or mulch. The 2019 

TR found many of the adhesives and synthetic fibers biodegraded with no negative impacts. 

There were some that were not as environmentally neutral as others, but all were also present 

in newspaper. The percentage of adhesives in the paper pots is very small. There could be an 

issue with paper used as a planting aid, containing large percentages of synthetic fibers that 

would not biodegrade readily.

3. Describe the probability of environmental contamination during manufacture, use, misuse, or 

disposal of such substance? [§6518(m)(3)]

There could be contaminants released into the environment during the manufacture of paper, 

and environmental degradation caused by harvest of cellulose, but no more than newspaper or 

recycled paper, which historically have been approved for use in organic agriculture. A 

difference between this paper and the previously approved newspaper is that we are not 

restricting it to the use of only recycled paper products. The annotation will allow virgin stocks 

of cellulose to be used in the paper used as a planting aid in organic agriculture. There are 

negative environmental impacts from harvesting trees to make paper such as road building, soil 

erosion, degraded water quality, and loss of habitat, but there are forestry best management 

practices that can mitigate some of these negative effects. Furthermore, there are non-tree 

cellulose sources that could be utilized in the future. The synthetic fibers that could be used in 

paper are manufactured in a wide range of production systems. These were not specifically 

addressed in the TR. 

4. Discuss the effect of the substance on human health. [§6517 (c)(1)(A)(i); §6517 (c)(2)(A)(i); 

§6518(m)(4)].

Paper, depending on the percentage of cellulose and type of synthetic fibers/materials used, is 

biodegradable and has no negative effects on human health. The 2019 TR did not find any 

evidence of harmful effects to human health.

5. Discuss any effects the substance may have on biological and chemical interactions in the 

agroecosystem, including the physiological effects of the substance on soil organisms 

(including the salt index and solubility of the soil), crops and livestock. [§6518(m)(5)] 

Paper, depending on the percentage of cellulose and type of synthetic fibers/materials used, is 

not harmful to the environment. The 2019 TR did not find any evidence of harmful effects to 

environmental health.

6. Are there any adverse impacts on biodiversity? (§205.200) 

Paper planting aids with high percentages of synthetic fibers that do not biodegrade readily 

could leave residues that would be harmful to terrestrial, avian, and aquatic wildlife if 

NOSB Proposals and Discussion Documents April 2021 14 of 172
consumed. Use of synthetic pesticides embedded in the pots could also have adverse impacts 

on biodiversity, but only organically allowable nutrients would be allowed in the paper used as a 

planting aid and there is a restriction on the types of materials allowed in the 40% non-cellulose 

based portion of the planting aids.

Category 3: Alternatives/Compatibility 

1. Are there alternatives to using the substance? Evaluate alternative practices as well as nonsynthetic and synthetic available materials. [§6518(m)(6)]

There are biodegradable pots made from composted cow manure (https://cowpots.com/) but 

these have never been petitioned for use in organic agriculture. We do not know if they could be 

approved or not. The manufacturer states the pots contain post-consumer newsprint and are 

100% biodegradable. In addition, they state they are not approved for Certified Organic 

operations as of January 2020. It is unclear if there are adhesives or synthetic fibers as well and 

what they are. 

There are also tools to help growers roll up newspaper into a pot. The paper chain pots offer 

greater efficiency for small scale transplanting, although mechanical or hand transplanting 

operations can be used in both small- and large-scale operations with other types of pots or soil 

blocks.

2. In balancing the responses to the criteria above, is the substance compatible with a 

system of sustainable agriculture? [§6518(m)(7)]

The Crops Subcommittee has developed the definition and annotation described in the motion 

below to both meet the OFPA criteria and to provide a practical and achievable material for 

manufacturers to produce and for organic farmers to use. The material is a planting aid and the 

intent is to limit the use of this material to activities around planting of seeds or plants.

While hand planting, machine planting, and other methods may provide some alternatives to 

paper planting aids, testimony provided to the Board indicates that the use of paper planting aids 

is critical for a segment of organic growers. 

The annotation of no less than 60% cellulose-based fiber content meets the needs of current 

manufacturers with the possibility that hemp or other natural cellulose fibers, capable of 

providing the strength needed to meet this annotation, could be used in the future. The 80% 

biobased requirement ensures that materials beyond the cellulose base are derived from 

biological sources. Both the 60% cellulosed based fiber content and 80% biobased content 

requirements could be made more stringent by future Boards through an annotation change. As 

the technology of these planting aids advances it is possible manufacturers will be able to use 

more natural and biobased materials to strengthen the planting aids. Continuing the prohibition 

on glossy paper and colored inks prevents the incorporation into organic soil of the worst 

contaminants. It is understood that there would be a small percentage of adhesives and coatings 

and the Technical Reviews on paper and paper pots described how these are already allowed in 

paper as mulch or compost feedstocks.

The allowance for virgin paper allows for special papers to be developed that meet the specific 

crop planting needs for a variety of uses, and the amount of paper produced from virgin sources 

for these planting aids would be very small compared to the amount of paper manufactured for 

NOSB Proposals and Discussion Documents April 2021 15 of 172
all uses. Added fungicides, antimicrobials, insecticides, or other synthetic items not typically 

found in paper would not be allowed under the current annotation unless they were on the 

National List for that purpose or otherwise compliant with the OFPA. Genetically modified 

materials are prohibited under the organic regulation and would not be allowed as ingredients in

paper-based crop planting aids. With the recommended annotation, paper-based crop planting

aids are compatible with a sustainable system of agriculture.

The Crops Subcommittee did not include a biodegradability standard in this proposal due to the 

time and cost needed for testing to that standard. The Subcommittee would like to see 

continued innovation to move to 100% biobased as well as an increase in the natural fiber

content of these planting aids. Additionally, the Subcommittee wants to make sure that these 

materials are promptly and economically available to growers of all sizes. The Subcommittee 

would like to encourage testing and trials of increased natural and/or biobased contents and 

believe that manufacturers would be less likely to provide small innovations of these new 

products to organic farmers if this testing were required. 

Subcommittee Vote:

Classification Motion: 

Motion to classify paper-based crop planting aid as a synthetic substance.

Motion by: Steve Ela 

Seconded by: Jerry D’Amore

Yes: 6 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 1 Recuse: 0

National List Motions: 

Motion to add to 205.2 Terms Defined:

Paper-based crop planting aid. A material that is comprised of at least 60% cellulose-based fiber by

weight, including, but not limited to, pots, seed tape, and collars that are placed in or on the soil and

later incorporated into the soil, excluding biodegradable mulch film. Up to 40% of the ingredients can be 

non-synthetic, other permitted synthetic ingredients at §205.601(j), or synthetic strengthening fibers,

adhesives, or resins. Contains no less than 80% biobased content as verified by a qualified third-party

assessment (e.g. laboratory test using ASTM D6866 or composition review by qualified personnel). 

Added nutrients must comply with §205.105, 205.203, and 205.206.

Motion by: Steve Ela 

Seconded by: Rick Greenwood

Yes: 6 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 1 Recuse: 0 

Motion to add to 205.601 (p) Production Aids:

Paper-based crop planting aids as defined in 205.2. Virgin or recycled paper without glossy paper or

colored inks. 

Motion by: Steve Ela 

Seconded by: Emily Oakley

Yes: 6 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 1 Recuse: 0 

Approved by Rick Greenwood, Crop Subcommittee Chair, to transmit to NOP January 19, 2021.

NOSB Proposals and Discussion Documents April 2021 16 of 172