alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 22

                     BROWN & SHARPE MANUFACTURING COMPANY
                     ------------------------------------
                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                        ------------------------------



Subsidiaries of the Registrant as of December 31, 1998 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                                                        Percentage of
                                                         Jurisdiction    Voting Power
                                                              of         Owned by the
                  Name of Subsidiary                    Incorporation     Registrant
------------------------------------------------------  --------------  --------------
<S>                                                     <C>             <C>
 
Borel & Dunner, Inc.                                    Michigan                  100%
 
Automation Software Inc.                                Delaware                  100%
 
Roch - Brown & Sharpe S.A.                              France                    100%
 
Mauser Prazisions Messmittel GmbH                       Germany                   100%
 
DEA - Brown & Sharpe S.p.A. ** and its subsidiaries:    Italy                     100%
 
 DEA - Brown & Sharpe S.A.                              Spain                     100%
 
 DEA - Brown & Sharpe S.A.                              France                    100%
 
 DEA - Brown & Sharpe KK                                Japan                     100%
 
Brown & Sharpe International Capital
 Corporation and its subsidiaries:                      Delaware                  100%
 
 Leitz - Brown & Sharpe Messtechnik G.m.b.H.            Germany                   100%
 
 Tesa - Brown & Sharpe S.A. and its subsidiaries:       Switzerland               100%
 
  P. Roch, S.a.R.L.                                     Switzerland               100%
 
  Tesa - Brown & Sharpe S.A.                            France                    100%
 
  Tesa - Brown & Sharpe KK                              Japan                     100%
 
 Brown & Sharpe Group Ltd.* and its subsidiaries:       United Kingdom            100%
 
  White Lodge Financial Limited                         United Kingdom            100%
 
  Brown & Sharpe Ltd.                                   United Kingdom            100%
 
  Mercer - Brown & Sharpe Ltd.                          United Kingdom            100%
</TABLE>

*       Owned 71.3% by Brown & Sharpe International Capital Corporation and
        28.7% by Tesa, S.A.

**      Owned 85.0% by Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Company and 15.0% by Brown &
        Sharpe International Capital Corporation.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of CB Richard Ellis Realty Trust (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Laurie E. Romanak, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ LAURIE E. ROMANAK  
|Laurie E. Romanak      
|Chief Financial Officer

November 16, 2009
# United State s Court of Appeals For the F irst Circuit

No. 09-1330 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, Appellee,

v. JEFFREY SHIELDS, Respondent, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on July 13, 2011 is amended as follows: On page 9, line 2 of footnote 2, replace "note 2" with "note 1"
On page 23, lines 5-6 of the continuation of footnote 12, replace "note 5" with "note 4"
On page 28, line 1 of footnote 15, replace "note 9" with "note 8"
## 1998 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

9-8-1998 

# C on t ine n t al C a s ualt y C o v

. D ' Andr e a

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al :

D ock e t 97-5004

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_1998

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1998 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du

. 

## R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" C on t ine n t al C as ualt y C o v . D ' Andr e a " (1998). 1998 D e cisio n s

. P ape r 216. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_1998/216

### Filed September 8, 1998

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 97-5004

CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY

v.
DOMINICK D'ANDREA, INC.,
Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff

v.

ALMONESSON ASSOCIATES; TARQUINI ORGANIZATION; THE DOUGLAS COMPANY; JOHN DOE 1-10, being a fictitious person, corporation or entity,

Third-Party Defendants

Dominick D'Andrea, Inc.,

Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court For the District of New Jersey (D.C. No.: 93-cv-1765)

Argued: January 22, 1998
Before: SLOVITER, LEWIS, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges

.

ORDER AMENDING OPINION
IT IS ORDERED that the slip opinion in the above ca se, filed on July 10, 1998, be amended as follows:
Add the following footnote to the concurring opinio n to be signaled at the end of the text on page 24 of the s lip opinion:

### Following the filing of this opinion, four district court

judges of the District of New Jersey who are famili ar with the magistrate judge in question have informed me that the magistrate judge is "one of the most understanding, patient, and attorney-friendly judge s [they] know." Nothing in this opinion is intended t o reflect on the ability of the magistrate judge, nor on his behavior or performance in any case other than the one at issue.

By the Court,

Dolores K. Sloviter Circuit Judge

Dated: September 8, 1998

A True Copy: Teste:
Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
<pre>
EXHIBIT 10.3  1997 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF ROBERT A. SPIGNO

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENT is made and entered into effective the 11th day of
August 1997, by and between Conectisys, Inc., a Colorado corporation
("CONECTISYS"), ("Employer"), and Robert A. Spigno ("Employee").

The following amendments to the language of the paragraphs as noted herein are
hereby amended to the initial signing of the Employment Agreement, dated
October 2, 1995, as follows; The amendments are effective September 1, 1997:

1.Employment and term. Employer hereby employs Employee and Employee hereby
accepts employment from Employer to perform the duties set forth below, for a
term of Five (5) years, subject to the provisions of this Agreement, and
thereafter shall be automatically extended for subsequent five (5) year terms
unless terminated as provided herein.  Employee's employment hereunder shall be
continued thereafter from term to term until either party shall give Sixty (60)
days prior written notice of termination.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, this
Agreement may be sooner terminated as provided in Paragraph 8 hereof.

2.    Duties.  Employee shall devote his full time and efforts to the business
of Employer, and shall be an officer of Conectisys holding the title of
President / CEO.

3.Compensation.  During the term of this Agreement, Employee shall receive as
compensation for his services, an annual base salary of One Hundred Sixty
Thousand Dollars($160,000). During the subsequent terms of employment under
this agreement, Employer shall negotiate Employee's annual base salary in good
faith; provided, however, that Employer shall pay Employee an annual base
salary in such subsequent terms of employment in an amount no less than the
annual base salary paid Employee during the term hereunder.  Employee shall
further receive a bonus, paid at year end, equal to six percent (6%) of all net
profits before taxes earned by Conectisys. Employee shall further receive a
bonus, paid at year end, equal to fifty percent (50%) of employee's salary for
compensation to the employee's continuing employment to the Company ("Staying
Bonus"). Staying Bonus shall be compensated for, with Conectisys Corp.
restricted common stock under rule 144 ("The Stock"). The calculation for the
value of the Stock will be, fifty percent (50%) of the average bid and ask
price for the stock for the 30 days prior to the issuance. Employee shall have
an option to purchase up to 500,000 shares of Conectisys Corporation restricted
stock under rule 144, at a cost of Fifty (50%) of the average market value
during the prior 30 days of  trading; this option shall remain open for
Three(3) years with an option to renew said option for an additional Three(3)
years.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly
executed as of the day and year first above written.

Employee: /s/ Roabert A. Spigno
         Robert A. Spigno

Employer: /s/ Richard Dowler
         Richard Dowler
         CFO
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1

                                TOM BROWN, INC.

                           Subsidiaries of Registrant

                               December 31, 1996

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    Jurisdiction of            Percent
Name of Subsidiary             Incorporation/Organization   of Ownership
------------------             --------------------------   ------------
<S>                                     <C>                     <C> 
Retex Gathering Company, Inc.           Wyoming                 100%

Rocno Corporation                       Texas                   100%

TBI Production Company                  Delaware                100%

TBI Oil Company                         Delaware                100%

TBI Exploration, Inc.                   Colorado                100%

Palisade Oil, Inc.                      Colorado                100%

TBI West Virginia, Inc.                 Delaware                100%

Wildhorse Energy Partners, L.L.C.       Delaware                 45%
</TABLE>


                                      -66-
EXHIBIT 10.6



PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   Ministry of Energy Mines and Petroleum Resources


RECORD OF 2 POST CLAIM - MINERAL TENURE ACT

(Section 27)



	
_____________________________________
	
391987_______________________________

	
Mining Division
	
Tenure No.

	
_____________________________________
	
_____________________________________

	
Gold Commissioner
	
Date of Record




_____________________________________________________________________________________


APPLICATION TO RECORD A 2 POST CLAIM



I, Stephen Kenwood, Name of Locator, 2073 149th Street, Surrey, British Columbia, V4A 8C4, (604) 535-8146, Client No. 134185, Agent for Paul Reynolds, 4035 W. 31st Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6S 1Y7, Client No. 122617, hereby apply for record of a 2 Post Claim for the location as outlined on the attached copy of mineral titles reference map No. 082L2E, in the Vernon Mining Division.



ACCESS



Describe how you gained access to the location, include reference to roads, trails, topographic features, permanent landmarks and a description of the legal post location.


Access to location gained by traveling east of Vernon on Highway 6 15 km. past Cherryville to Monashee Creek.  The initial post is approximately 3.1 km. south of Monashee Creek along Highway 6 and about 50 metres east of Highway 6.



TAG INFORMATION



I have affixed the portion of the metal identification tag embossed "INITIAL POST" (No. 1) to the initial post and impressed this information on the tag:



TAG NUMBER 706067 M  INITIAL POST (No. 1)



	
CLAIM NAME
	
WYATT 4

	
LOCATOR
	
Stephen Kenwood

	
AGENT FOR
	
Paul Reynolds

	
DATE COMMENCED
	
February 8, 2002

	
TIME COMMENCED
	
9:45

	
DIR. TO F.P.
	
015

	
METRES TO RIGHT
	
0

	
METRES TO LEFT
	
500






"Direction" means a bearing measured between 0 degrees and 360 degrees, where 0 degrees is the bearing of true north.    time is a.m.


I have securely affixed the portion of the metal identification tag embossed "FINAL POST (No. 2)" to the final post (or the witness post) and impressed this information on the tag:



	
CLAIM NAME
	
WYATT 4

	
LOCATOR
	
Stephen Kenwood

	
AGENT FOR
	
Paul Reynolds

	
DIST. FROM I.P.
	
500 metres

	
DATE COMPLETED
	
February 8, 2002

	
TIME COMPLETED
	
11:00






If a witness post was placed for final post:  Bearing and distance from witness post to the true position of the final corner post, exactly as written on the witness post:  _________ degrees, _________ metres.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENT



I have complied with all of the terms and conditions of the Mineral Tenure Act and Regulations pertaining to the location of the 2 post claims and have attached a plan of the location on which the positions of the initial and final post (and witness post, if applicable) are indicated.  The tag information supplied above is the identical information that I impressed upon the respective tags affixed to the applicable post when I located this claim, and the information is true and correct.


/s/  "Stephen Kenwood"

Stephen Kenwood

Signature of Locator



SEAL



RECEIVED

SUB-RECORDER

VANCOUVER, BC

FEB. 28, 2002

Recording Stamp
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00393-CR

Rashad Azmi Elqutob

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 3

of Tarrant County (1334940R)

April 9, 2015

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgments. It is ordered that the judgments

of the trial court are affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-20582

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ASDRUBAL ADONAY BUSTILLO-QUAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-01-CR-44-1

--------------------

April 11, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Asdrubal

Adonay Bustillo-Quan has requested leave to withdraw as counsel

and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). Bustillo has not filed a response to counsel’s

motion to withdraw. Our independent review of the brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,

the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused

from further responsibilities in this case, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 A0 49 6 . W ASEEM DAKER v . ROBERT L. RUSSELL, I II

.
Th e Ap pel l an t i n t h e ab o v e-s t y l ed cas e h as fi l ed a M ot i o n Fo r Vo l u n t ary Di s m i s s al W i t h o u t Preju d i ce. Sai d m o t i o n i s h ereb y GRANTED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 

## December 30, 2019

12/30/2019
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Salvador Victorino, * From the 238th District Court

 of Midland County,

 Trial Court No. CR42114.

Vs. No. 11-14-00342-CR * November 30, 2016

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that 

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Proposed NOI threshold for Mosquito Control in Florida

Dwinell, Steve 

to: 

Virginia Garelick, Jack Faulk 

11/12/2009 08:09 AM 

Cc: 

"Coram, Phil", "Dennis Howard", "Daiker, Dave", "Michael Page", "Potts, Elsa", "Schardt, Jeffrey", 

"Caton, William" 

Show Details 

History: This message has been forwarded. 

Attached is a proposed threshold for the NOI for mosquito control in Florida. The threshold is based on the 

reported applications by organized mosquito control programs in Florida. The reports are available at: 

http://www.flaes.org/aes-ent/mosquito/reports.html

Steven E. Dwinell

Assistant Director

Division of Agricultural Environmental Services

Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services

3125 Conner Boulevard

Tallahassee Florida 32399

850-488-7447

850-488-2164 Fax

 

Please note: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from state officials 

regarding state business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your e-mail 

communications may therefore be subject to public disclosure.

 

 

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\jfaulk\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web5916.htm 5/11/2010
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Action Industries, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, I, Joseph Meuse, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  November 4, 2009 Action Industries, Inc. By:  /s/ Joseph Meuse Joseph Meuse  {A0055732.DOC}  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Action Industries, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, I, Inna Sheveleva, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  November 4, 2009 Action Industries, Inc. By:  /s/ Inna Sheveleva Inna Sheveleva   {A0055732.DOC}
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

The University of Texas of * From the 358th District Court

the Permian Basin et al., of Ector County,

 Trial Court No. D-17-07-0777-CV.

Vs. No. 11-17-00325-CV * May 31, 2019

Michael Banzhoff, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion,

we reverse the trial court’s order to the extent the trial court denied a plea to 

the jurisdiction as to Michael Banzhoff’s abuse of process and ultra vires

claims, and we render judgment dismissing those claims for lack of 

jurisdiction. In all other respects, the order of the trial court is affirmed. The 

costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Michael Banzhoff.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 31, 2014

h0127 

# Order

Clerk January 31, 2014

147848

DAVID KIRCHER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 147848

COA: 314454

Jackson CC: 11

- 002690

- AH

PARNALL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

WARDEN,

Defendant

- Appellee.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 5, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considere d, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.