alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2011

- 0733 Directorate Identifier: 2010

-NE

- 36

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into an d then out of the changed cell

. Estimated Costs:

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

U.S. Registered Products Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet
Stage 1 Airseal (P/N 50L879) 0.0 $ 0.00 $19,418 $19,418.00 

### 869 $16,874,242. 00 Stage 2 Airseal (P/N 53L030) 0.0 $ 0.00 $19,930 $ 19,930.00 869 $17,319,170. 00 Stage 1 Ring (P/N 50L664) 0.0 $ 0.00 $7,487 $ 7,487.00 869 $6,506,203.0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.0 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $40,699,615 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated C osts table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### : The largest life reduction for the Stage 1 Airseal across all of the engine models is 16%. Therefore, the incremental cost of the AD for the Stage 1 Airseal is: Cost of Stage 1 Airseal at full Certified Life * Life Reduction = $121,365*0.16 = $19,418. Using similar logic for the Stage 2 Airseal gives: $99,654*0.20 = $19,930. For the Stage 1 Ring: $46,793*0.16 = $7,487

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO

* Explanation: DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? YES * NO

* Explanation: Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
J-A04030-15

*Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37

A.D.W.,

 Appellant

 v.

L.A.K.,

 Appellee

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 1232 WDA 2014

Appeal from the Order Entered July 14, 2104

in the Court of Common Pleas of Jefferson County,

Civil Division, at No(s): 560-2013 C.D.

A.D.W.,

 Appellant

 v.

L.A.K.,

 Appellee

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 1464 WDA 2014

Appeal from the Order Entered August 28, 2104

in the Court of Common Pleas of Jefferson County,

Civil Division, at No(s): 560-2013 C.D.

BEFORE: BOWES, OLSON, and STRASSBURGER,* JJ.

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING MEMORANDUM BY STRASSBURGER, J.:

 FILED APRIL 10, 2015

I agree with the learned Majority’s well-written disposition of Mother’s 

substantive claims. However, I write separately to note that, given Mother’s 

willful noncompliance with the trial court’s orders and absence from the 

jurisdiction, I would decline to consider her appeal in the first instance. In 
J-A04032-15

- 2 -

my view, similar to a fugitive from the law, Mother has by her actions 

forfeited her right to appellate review. See Pa.R.A.P. 1972(a)(6) (permitting 

this Court, upon motion of either party, to continue generally or quash an 

appeal where the appellant is a fugitive). Accordingly, I would quash this 

appeal.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



I, John S. Buchanan, Chief Financial Officer of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.



Dated: November 9,
2005



By:

/s/    JOHN S.
BUCHANANJohn S. Buchanan Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust and will be retained by Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 31 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 10, 2019 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall for a ceremony 

as part of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR HOLOCAUST 

4 DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE CEREMONY. 

5 Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is 

6 authorized to be used on April 29, 2019, for a ceremony 

7 as part of the commemoration of the days of remembrance 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 31 RDS 

1 of victims of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the 

2 ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with such con3 ditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 9, 2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2007-1369 

POWEROASIS, INC. 

and POWEROASIS NETWORKS, LLC, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

WAYPORT, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

 Sibley P. Reppert, Lahive & Cockfield LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for 

plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was William A. Scofield, Jr.

 William F. Lee, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Boston, 

Massachusetts, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were David B. 

Bassett, Christopher J. Meade, and Amr O. Aly, of New York, New York. 

Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts 

Judge Rya W. Zobel 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 

2007-1369 

POWEROASIS, INC. and POWEROASIS NETWORKS, LLC, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

WAYPORT, INC., 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in case 

no. 04-CV-12023, Judge Rya W. Zobel. 

______________________________ 

 DECIDED: April 11, 2008 

______________________________ 

 

Before NEWMAN, SCHALL, and MOORE, Circuit Judges. 

MOORE, Circuit Judge. 

PowerOasis, Inc. and PowerOasis Networks, LLC (PowerOasis) raise a number 

of claim construction arguments on appeal following the United States District Court for 

the District of Massachusetts’s grant of summary judgment that claims 15, 18, 31, 35, 

38, 40, and 49 of U.S. Patents Nos. 6,466,658 (‘658 patent) and 6,721,400 (‘400 patent) 

are not infringed by Wayport, Inc. We vacate and remand. 

We need not discuss the specifics of PowerOasis’s arguments because of our 

decision in PowerOasis, Inc. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., No. 2007-1265 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 

2008), which holds claims 15, 18, 31, 35, 38, 40, and 49 of the ‘658 and ‘400 patents 
invalid. Accordingly, we vacate the district court's grant of summary judgment of noninfringement and remand with instructions for the district court to enter judgment 

consistent with our holding that claims 15, 18, 31, 35, 38, 40, and 49 of the ‘658 and 

‘400 patents are invalid. 

2007-1369 2
[COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION LETTERHEAD]

DATE:   1/31/02

TO:     Matthew Gabel
        Bank of America

FROM:   Ben K. Wells
        Compaq Computer Corporation

REF:    RATABLE REDUCTION OF COMMITMENT IN MULTIYEAR FACILITY

================================================================================

This notice is delivered pursuant to the terms of section 2.07 of the existing
Revolving Credit Agreement date September 22, 1997.

Effective Tuesday, February 5, 2002, the existing facility will be reduced from
the current $2.0 billion to an aggregate $1.75 billion.

Apply the required ratable reduction to all commitments under this facility, and
notify the bank group of this change in commitment status.

Regards,

/s/ BEN K. WELLS
-----------------------------------
Ben K. Wells
Vice President, Corporate Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1207 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1207

 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to include United States 
     nationals among the eligible employees of an EB-5 commercial 
                  enterprise, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2019

Mrs. Radewagen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to include United States 
     nationals among the eligible employees of an EB-5 commercial 
                  enterprise, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``U.S. Nationals Employment Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF UNITED STATES NATIONALS AS ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES.

    Section 203(b)(5)(A)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1153(b)(5)(A)(ii)) is amended by inserting after ``not fewer 
than 10 United States citizens'' the following: ``, United States 
nationals,''.
                                 <all>
```
EO. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 \t

OFFICIAL BUBiM

STATE OF TBtA:

PENALTY FOR

q P&fflWATE USE

RE: WR-82,443-01

JERRY DALE JONES

BETO I UNIT-TDC# 1894647

1391 FM 3328

TENNESSEE COLONY, TX 75880

0 2 1M

0004279596 MAR 

MAILED FROM ZIPCOD

7 87 11023 08

S3 CQT-S3B 7S8BO "I •••-"• I-"• ••Mt"• •if ••"• t- '11 ffi II*"*• i"i-If»i*-••-! s-i iilit-* •«t•l> itlVir
OoT-OS7^l^97- ^^"i ^ 

PAULTONKO 

21 ST DISTRICT, NEW YORK 

COMMITTEE ON 

EDUCATION AN D LABOR 

SUBCOMMITTEES: 

HIGHER EDUCATION, LIFELONG 

LEARNING, AND COMPETITIVENESS 

HEALTHY FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES 

COMMITTEE ON 

SCIENCE AN D TECHNOLOGY 

SUBCOMMITTEES: 

ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 

RESEARCH AND SCIENCE EDUCATION 

TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION 

mm\(\\\%\m\, sen 20515-3221 

December 17, 2010 

128 CANNON HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING 

WASHINGTON, DC 20515 

(202)226-5076 

DISTRICT OFFICES: 

ROOM 827 

O'BRIEN FEDERAL BUILDING 

ALBANY, NY 12207 

(518) 465-0700 

61 CHURCH STREET 

ROOM 309 

AMSTERDAM, NY 12010 

(518)843-3400 

105 JAY STREET 

ROOM 15 

".,' SCHENECTADY, NY 12305 

rr. . (518)374.-4547 

I 

;-33 rr\:PZ.-S. 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

I am writing in support of the proposal firom Cape Air to continue Essential Air Service 

(EAS) between Albany and the cities of Watertown, Massena and Ogdensburg located in 

upstate New York. 

The proposal, under docket number DOT-OST-1997-2842, is in the best interest of New 

York State because it provides an economic link between the State's capital city and the 

communities, businesses and colleges in the above mentioned North Coimtry cities. 

Cape Air has created jobs in New York State by establishing its own air maintenance 

facility and through its baggage handling and ticketing operations all of which are located 

at the Albany International Airport in my Congressional District. In addition. Cape Air 

has strengthened its proposal by including flights from Albany to Boston. 

I commend you on your tireless efforts to bolster our nation's infrastructure and on your 

continued support of vital air service to communities in upstate New York. 

Your full and fair consideration of this request consistent with current laws, rules, 

regulations and agency policy will be appreciated. 

Sincerely, 

PAUL D. TONKO 

Member of Congress 

PDT/njv 

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
Attachment 1

Catawba Site Visit Presentation
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF
WHITE ELECTRONIC DESIGNS CORPORATION

|                                   |  |               |  | 
|---------------------------------- |  | ------------- |  | 
|Name of Subsidiary                 |  | Domicile     
|                                   |  |              
|Interface Data Systems, Inc.       |  | Arizona      
|Panelview, Incorporated            |  | Oregon       
|IDS Acquisition Corporation (1)    |  | Arizona      
|Electronic Designs, Inc.           |  | Delaware     
|Bowmar/A.L.I., Inc.                |  | Massachusetts
|Graymor Coatings, Incorporated (2) |  | Oregon       



---

|(1) |  | IDS Acquisition Corporation is a direct subsidiary of Interface Data
Systems, Inc.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | Graymor Coatings, Incorporated is a direct subsidiary of
Panelview, Incorporated.
PRUNE MARKETING COMMITTEE

ROSTER

Marketing Order No. 993 3017 Douglas Blvd., Ste. 280

2-year Term Ending May 31, 2022 Roseville, CA 95661

2020-2022

MANAGER: CHAIRPERSON:

Donn Zea Ranvir Singh

(916) 565-6235 (530) 218-8853

(916) 565-6237 ronsingham@aol.com

dzea@cdpb.org

Members Alternates

Independent Producers

District 1 Mike Vereschagin Richard Conte

Orland, CA Orland, CA

District 2 Peter Righero Vacant

Live Oak, CA

District 3 Sandra Mitchell David Waters

Yuba City, CA Yuba City, CA

District 4 Curtis Eller David Wohletz

Corning, CA Los Molinos, CA

District 5 Dan Bozzo Matt Bozzo

Gridley, CA Yuba City, CA

District 6 Ranvir Singh Tirath S. Johal

Plumas Lake, CA Yuba City, CA

District 7 Nick Cubre Vacant

Kerman, CA

Member-At-Large Jonathan Lavy Vacant

Yuba City, CA

Cooperative Producers

Bob Amarel John Amarel

Yuba City, CA Yuba City, CA

Rajeev Davit Dave Loquaci

Yuba City, CA Madera, CA

Phillip Filter Gary Thiara 

Live Oak, CA Yuba City, CA
 Brendon Flynn James Strong 

Gerber, CA Chico, CA

Joe Turkovich Vacant

Winters, CA 

Scott K. Workman Vacant 

Fresno, CA

Independent Handlers

George Sousa Stephen Sousa

Vacaville, CA Vacaville, CA

 Jaswant S. Bains Satpaul S. Bains

Yuba City, CA Yuba City, CA

John Friend Richard Wilbur

Alamo, CA Yuba City, CA

John Taylor Sekul Spaich

Yuba City, CA Olivehurst, CA

Cooperative Handlers

Ana Klein Jeff McLemore

Yuba City, CA Yuba City, CA

Dane Lance Harold Upton

Yuba City, CA Yuba City, CA

Brad Schuler Stephanie Harralson

Yuba City, CA Yuba City, CA

Public

Maxwell Norton Vacant

Atwater, CA
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 27, 2018

p0723 

# Order

Clerk July 27, 2018

156633 & (12)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 156633

COA: 339375

Wayne CC: 07

- 006974

- FC

EPIGMENIO GOMEZ

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to add issues is GRANTED. The application for

leave to appeal the September 21, 2017 order of the Court of Appea ls is considered, and

it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing

entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7365

LOUIS RYCHWALSKI, JR., 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

CMS; WARDEN KATHLEEN GREEN; CPT. ROBERT J. MOORE; PAUL 

ZIOLKOWSKI; WILLIAM MAYCOCK; ROBERT C. MCGEE; JOHN BROMLEY; 

CHARLES WESTBROOK; CRAIG REID; WILLIAM FISHER; WEXFORD 

HEALTH SOURCES, INC.; MARYAM MESSFOROSH, P.A.; JASON CLEM, 

M.D.; BRUCE FORD, P.A.; PAUL MATERA, M.D.; TERRY DAVIS, 

P.A.; CORIZON, LLC., 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. 

(1:13-cv-02082-GLR) 

Submitted: January 26, 2015 Decided: April 13, 2015

Before KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Louis Rychwalski, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michelle Jacquelyn 

Marzullo, MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., 

Towson, Maryland; Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant 

Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS, 

RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellees. 
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
3

PER CURIAM:

Louis Rychwalski, Jr., appeals the district court’s 

order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 (2012) civil rights action. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Rychwalski v. CMS, 

No. 1:13-cv-02082-GLR (D. Md. Aug. 25, 2014). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
International Commodity Procurement Division Purchases

FY2020 - Quarter 1

Commodity Qty in MT PO Value Average Cost

BEANS, BLACK BAG-50 KG 570 $580,521.00 $1,018.46

BEANS, GREAT NORTHERN BAG-50 KG 360 $572,457.60 $1,590.16

BEANS, PEA BAG-50 KG 1,170 $1,656,109.70 $1,415.48

BEANS, SMALL RED BAG-50 KG 180 $185,746.50 $1,031.93

CORN, YELLOW BAG-50 KG 500 $129,000.00 $258.00

CORN-SOY BLEND PLUS BAG-HP-25 KG 1,100 $671,155.80 $610.14

CSB SUPER CEREAL PLUS BOX-10/1.5 KG 9,900 $19,415,985.33 $1,961.20

OIL, SOYBEAN, CRUDE, DEGUMMED BULK 19,730 $15,986,070.00 $810.24

OIL, VEGETABLE BOTTLE, PLS-6/4 L 670-719 200 $239,344.63 $1,196.51

OIL, VEGETABLE CAN-6/4 L 3,220 $3,856,034.57 $1,197.49

OIL, VEGETABLE PAIL-20 L 120 $166,870.44 $1,390.41

PEAS, GREEN, SPLIT BAG-50 KG 80 $39,412.80 $492.66

PEAS, YELLOW, SPLIT BAG-50 KG 3,030 $1,070,238.90 $353.21

RICE, 2/7 LG, W-MLD BAG-50 KG 400 $212,751.80 $531.88

RICE, 5/20 LG, W-MLD, FORT BAG-50 KG 400 $218,168.00 $545.42

RICE, 5/20 MG, W-MLD, FORT BAG-50 KG 1,250 $789,337.50 $631.47

RICE, MILLED BULK 25,930 $13,570,984.10 $523.37

WHEAT, HARD RED WINTER BULK 32,000 $7,260,180.00 $226.88

WHEAT, SOFT WHITE BULK 59,000 $12,752,260.00 $216.14

Grand Total 159,140 $79,372,628.67

Commodity Qty in EA PO Value Average Cost

BAGS, WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE- 50 KG 1,468,000 $530,146.55 $0.3611
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

R. ALLAN PAYNE,

 Appellant/Petitioner,

vs.

FERRY LANE MANAGEMENT, 

LLC, a Wyoming limited liability 

company,

 Appellee/Respondent. 

Case No.: DA 24-0429

ORDER GRANTING JOINT 

MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

The parties having filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal pursuant to Rule 

16(5), Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure, and good cause appearing therefor;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said Motion is GRANTED. This appeal is 

dismissed with prejudice and each party shall bear their own attorney’s fees and 

costs.

ELECTRONICALLY DATED AND SIGNED BELOW

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 1 2024

10/01/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0429
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

WALKER AG SUPPLY, LLC, et al 

Complainant, 

v. 

WAHOO AIRPORT AUTHORITY, 

WAHOO MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 

Respondent. 

FAA Docket No. 16-14-08 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 16, subpart B, 

the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby 

extended to March 21, 2016. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this 

case. 

#.;Byron K. Huffman. Acting Director 

(/' Airport Compliance and Management Analysis 

Dale 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on December~, 2015, I caused to be placed in the 

United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the foregoing document 

addressed to: 

Agent for Complainants: 

Mr. William Foster 

Better Airports, LLC 

4504 North Versailles Avenue 

Dallas, Texas 75205 

Counsel for Respondent: 

Mr. Larry S. Kaplan 

Mr. Keith Yamaguchi 

Kaplan, Massamillo & Andrews, LLC 

200 West Madison Street 

16th Floor 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

Copies to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-100 

FAA Central Region, ACE-600 

Claudia Roberts 

Office of Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis