alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 1 6 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk November 1 6 , 2020

1 6 1 477 & (87)

RAYMOND R. SMITH

, Plaintiff

- Appellee

, and

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY OF

AMERICA,

Intervening Plaintiff,

SC: 161477

v COA: 339705

MCAC: 14

- 000003

CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC

, Defendant

- Appell ant

.

_______________________________________ ____ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs. The

motion of amicus curiae The County Road Association Sel f

- Insurance Fund to deny the

parties’ stipulation to dismiss is DENIED.
ULYSSES BERNARD 

WOODFAULK,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-2816

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 7, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County.

Gregory S. Parker, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Zachary F. Lawton, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Lauren Brudnicki, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., MARSTILLER and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.1

                                          
                                CONSENT OF KPMG LLP
                                          

Binks Sames Corporation:

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration 
statement (No. 333-30191) on Form S-8 of Binks Sames Corporation of our 
report dated February 22, 1999 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of 
Binks Sames Corporation and consolidated subsidiaries as of November 30, 1998 
and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations, 
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year 
period ended November 30, 1998, which report appears in the November 30, 1998 
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Binks Sames Corporation.

Chicago, Illinois                            /s/ KPMG LLP
February 22, 1999
. ^ "M01053-O3JOM

TUtPL 91-€>l~/2 326-A

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

APR 15 2015

.~ //i. AbelAcosla,Clerk

_Z/w ccrt&m <2.ko&<.J (u&rrs ahest /f$f&&/ 4s y&<-<r rcc&rds.

A /Ward J<f~20fZ . HvU&ls tH>u rtco^/s 'fnejfofc -fA^ Ay

Ame/i/D &/*xr / H*h*aj &tpus a/as Aid ^// zs^zv/x

but Qt&QUSe ~fKf_ 'First far*} u/4s ^/ijr^ijs^ S-fr-o&b u/A$ /?,*.</^r

%0IZ~ /At SOb Jtid/ifal' DtiJriih else! siof' de> a y<£&/$ y^*/ C0**£^u<}f»^

&<P IaJ fa "i4W' (A//'f Jhrd "That" &/fi~*rr <jkea/</ it//// tht. ft>j*n*f***4 ,
i _ L 

OAR Box 1802 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

30) IV-E-25 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 11/4/2008 11:57:59 AM Sheet30 of 117 
P.2 

1 

Date sent: 

From: 

To: 

Copies to: 

Subject: 

Mon, 26 Oct 1998 08:31:12 0500 

JON DEVINE <DCWIC01.DEVINEJON@RT-MAIL2.RTP.EPA.GOV > 

CRUMPLER.DENNIS@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV, S0L0M0N.DAVID@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV 

SILVERMAN.STEVEN@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV 

NSR meeting -Forwarded 

Attached is a brief docket entry that should be incorporated into the 

NSR reform docket. It was drafted by Steve Silverman of OGC, who 

attended a meeting with pulp and paper concerns last week. 

CONFIDENTIAL PREDECISIONAL: Does Not Represent Agency Position 

Ji-e-zs 

Malay Jindal -1 Tue, 27 Oct 1998 09:23:12 
P.3 

S 

,•*•*> Date sent: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 14:17:05 0400 

From: STEVEN SILVERMAN < SILVERMAN.STEVEN@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV > 

To: F00TE.GREG0RY@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV 

Subject: NSR meeting 

please put following into docket for proposed rule 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: NSR Rulemaking Docket 

FROM: Steven Silverman, Attorney 

RE: Meeting between EPA Officials and Pulp and Paper Industry 

Representatives 

On October 22,1998 senior EPA officials, including Assistant 

Administrator Perciasepe, and Divison Directors Wegman and Jordan met 

with representatives of the pulp and paper industry including 

Josephine Cooper and representatives from Union Camp, Georgia Pacific 

and other companies. Their subject was the pending NSR rulemaking 

proposal. They maintained that the existing program is too complicated 

and enforced in an arbitrary manner. They believe that too many key 

decisions turn on interpretations which are not always disclosed and 

may vary from Region to Region. They also question the burden 

involved in determining whether a pollution release increment 

triggering NSR review has become too complicated, and further question 

means of calculating pollutant increases. 

EPA officials listened carefully and urged the industry to 

provide 

specific examples or case histories where possible. In addition, the 

Assistant Administrator noted that the 40 ton increment appears to be 

a concensus value as to when NSR review should be triggered. 

'sjarM-lYcance, 

Malay Jindal -• 1 •- Tue, 27 Oct 1998 09:17:47
s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 14, 2015

No. 04-14-00811-CV

Randy COLEMAN and Jim Coleman Company,

Appellants

v.

Ralph DEAN,

Appellee

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-04-49987-CV

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellants’ brief were originally due on March 2, 2015. This Court granted Appellants’ s

motions for a 30-day extension of time to file their briefs, extending the deadlines to April 2, 

2015. Appellants now file a second motion for extension of time requesting another 30-day 

extension. 

It is ORDERED appellants’ motions are GRANTED. Appellants must file their briefs on 

or before May 1, 2015. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME ARE 

DISFAVORED.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED

We are providing this Certificate pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C., Section 1350. It accompanies OfficeMax Incorporateds annual report on Form 10-K (the Report) for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2010.





I, Ravichandra Saligram, OfficeMax Incorporateds chief executive officer, certify that:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, OfficeMax Incorporateds financial condition and results of operations.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    RAVICHANDRA
SALIGRAMRavichandra Saligram Chief Executive Officer


I,
Bruce Besanko, OfficeMax Incorporateds chief financial officer, certify that:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, OfficeMax Incorporateds financial condition and results of operations.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    BRUCE
BESANKOBruce Besanko Chief Financial Officer


Dated: February 21, 2011

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to OfficeMax Incorporated and will be retained by OfficeMax Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2  Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    The undersigned hereby certifies, in my capacity as an officer of NSTAR Electric Company, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:(i)the enclosed Annual Report of NSTAR Electric Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(ii)the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NSTAR Electric Company.  Dated: February 9, 2009By:_/s/ JAMES J. JUDGE_____James J. JudgeSenior Vice President,Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
CITYAREACHAMBEROFCOMMERCEMay6,2015TheHonorableAnthonyR.FoxxSecretaryofTransportationUSDepartmentofTransportation1200NewJersey AveSEWashington,DC20590TheHonorableJohnF.KerrySecretaryofStateUSDepartmentofState2201CStreetNWWashington,DC20520DearSecretariesKerryandFoxx:Asyouknow,TraverseCityisoneofthemostbeautifulandwidelyvisitedpartsofMichigan.Accordingtoa2013studybytheAndersonEconomicGroup,•"Over3.3millionvisitortripsweremadetothearea;•Thesetripsresultedin$1.18billionindirectspendingtoareabusinesses,•Tourismisresponsibleforcreatingandmaintainingnearly12,000jobs;•Tourismgeneratedmorethan$1.23billionineconomicactivityfortheTraverseCityarea."Further,thestudycites,almost$67millioninsalestaxrevenuehasbeengeneratedfromtourismthroughouttheStateofMichigan.ThatiswhyIamextremelyconcernedtohearthatOpenSkiesAgreements,whichsetalevelplayingfieldforairlinecarriersaroundtheworld,arebeingundercutbyQatarAirways,EtihadAirwaysandEmiratesAirline.Thisisduetothefacttheyarereceivingbillionsof202E.GrandviewParkway•TraverseCity,Ml49684•Phone:231-947-5075•Fax231-946-2565www.tcchamberorg•E-mail:info@tcchamberorgThankyouverymuchOblingerExecutiveDirectoryourconsideration.cc:SenatorGaryPetersSenatorDebbieStabenowRepresentativeDanBenishek
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Dean L. Cash, Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of ATELCapital Equipment Fund XI, LLC (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30,2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: November 22, 2005        /s/ Dean L. Cash  Dean L. Cash  President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

KYLIL MYATT,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 5 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00070-CV

STEPHEN WULFF, Appellant

V.

JEFF FRATANGELO, Appellee

On Appeal from the 276th District Court

Marion County, Texas

Trial Court No. 0900107

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Stephen Wulff, appellant, filed a notice of appeal in this matter on August 22, 2014. 

Both the clerk’s and reporter’s records were due to be filed with this Court on or before 

November 24, 2014. Neither record has been filed, and there is no indication that Wulff has paid 

for or made arrangements for payment of the fees associated with their preparation. 

Unless otherwise excused, a non-indigent appellant must either pay for or make 

arrangements for the payment of the fees related to preparation of the appellate record to ensure 

that the record is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a)(2), (b)(3); see TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(c); 

37.3(b), (c).

By letter dated December 22, 2014, and pursuant to Rules 37.3(b) and (c) and 42.3(b) and

(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, our clerk’s office provided Wulff with notice of 

and an opportunity to cure these defects. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), (c), 42.3(b), (c). The 

clerk’s letter further warned Wulff that if he did not submit an adequate response to our defect 

letter within ten days of the date of the letter, his appeal would be dismissed for want of 

prosecution. See id. We have received no communication from Wulff responsive to the 

December 22 correspondence from our clerk’s office, and we have not received the appellate 

record.
3

Pursuant to Rules 37.3(b) and (c) and 42.3(b) and (c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

Ralph K. Burgess

Justice

Date Submitted: January 15, 2015

Date Decided: January 16, 2015
Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Natiollal Husincss Aircrafl Assodation Eli CoW

I

'iJL/PO -

Region~11Airline Associ::.tioll Dave L01t('l"('r

"6 JLi/IG -

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman C/j4)IO -

AT.'\. i\:( L-opez 't)'1j/U -

Page 1\2-4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF EARNINGS OF BENTHOS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARY CONTAINED ELSEWHERE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,930
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,432
<ALLOWANCES>                                       220
<INVENTORY>                                      4,794
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,189
<PP&E>                                           6,641
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,862
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,787
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,780
<BONDS>                                          4,649
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           110
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,248
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,787
<SALES>                                         17,248
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,248
<CGS>                                            9,801
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,347
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     8
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  49
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,076
<INCOME-TAX>                                       248
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                828
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       828
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .61<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60<F1>

<FN>
<F1>THE EARNINGS PER SHARE INFORMATION HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS
NO. 128 AND BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN PLACE OF
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>

</TABLE>
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

Mr. Ali Mirzakhalili, P.E. August 3, 2009

Administrator, Air Quality Management

Division of Air and Waste Management

Delaware Department of Natural Resources 

 And Environmental Control

156 South State Street

Dover, Delaware 19901

Dear Mr. Mirzakhalili,:

On June 29, 2009, EPA received a revision to the Delaware State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) from the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC)

pertaining to administrative and non-substantive changes to 36 Delaware SIP regulations. EPA 

has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing 

it to prepare a Direct Final Rulemaking Notice (DFRN). 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Harold A. 

Frankford, Office of Air Programs, at (215) 814-2108. He is the principal contact for this 

rulemaking action. 

Sincerely, 

 /s/

 Diana Esher, Acting Director

 Air Protection Division (3AP00)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1198 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1198

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   404 South Boulder Highway in Henderson, Nevada, as the ``Henderson 
                Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. HENDERSON VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 404 South Boulder Highway in Henderson, Nevada, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Henderson Veterans Memorial Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Henderson 
Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1115 

To amend the Consumer Product Safety Act to remove the exclusion of 

pistols, revolvers, and other firearms from the definition of consumer 

product in order to permit the issuance of safety standards for such 

articles by the Consumer Product Safety Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2019 

Ms. KELLY of Illinois (for herself, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. YARMUTH, Ms. NORTON, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. COHEN, 

Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. PLASKETT, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, Ms. 

BROWNLEY of California, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. 

CICILLINE, and Mr. MOULTON) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Consumer Product Safety Act to remove the 

exclusion of pistols, revolvers, and other firearms from 

the definition of consumer product in order to permit 

the issuance of safety standards for such articles by 

the Consumer Product Safety Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Firearm Safety Act 

5 of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1115 IH

1 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF EXCLUSION OF FIREARMS FROM THE 

2 DEFINITION OF CONSUMER PRODUCT. 

3 Section 3(a)(5) of the Consumer Product Safety Act 

4 (15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(5)) is amended by striking subpara5 graph (E) and redesignating subparagraphs (F) through 

6 (I) as subparagraphs (E) through (H), respectively. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00878-CR

Ricardo DE LA O,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2023CR0309

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 22, 2023

DISMISSED

On September 29, 2023, appellant Ricardo De La O II filed a “Notice of Appeal From 

Negotiated Plea.” After De La O filed his notice of appeal, the district clerk filed a copy of the 

clerk’s record showing De La O entered into a written plea bargain agreement with the State 

pursuant to which he pled nolo contendere to three counts of aggravated sexual assault. The clerk’s 

record further shows the trial court imposed a sentence in accordance with the agreement and 

signed a certification stating this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.”

See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). 
04-23-00878-CR

- 2 -

“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised 

by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to 

appeal; or (C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.” Id. We must dismiss 

an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made 

part of the record.” Id. R. 25.2(d). 

Here, the clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed 

the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by De La O. It also does not include 

a written motion filed and ruled upon before trial; nor does it indicate the trial court gave De La O 

permission to appeal. Thus, the record supports the trial court’s certification this is a plea-bargain 

case and De La O does not have a right to appeal. See id. R. 25.2.; Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine 

whether trial court’s certification is accurate). 

On October 6, 2023, we ordered De La O to file a response establishing an amended 

certification showing he has the right to appeal has been made part of the appellate record. We 

cautioned De La O failure to satisfactorily respond to this order within the time provided would 

result in the dismissal of this appeal. On November 5, 2023, De La O’s counsel filed a response 

to our order agreeing De La O entered into a plea bargain with the State, the trial court imposed a 

sentence in accordance with the agreement, and the signed certificate stated De La O had no right 

of appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). 

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish