alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**995 CA 16-00292**  PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

EMMA B. SCHUVER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

PAMELA LODESTRO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF G. MARVIN SCHUVER, DECEASED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANT.

WRIGHT, WRIGHT AND HAMPTON, JAMESTOWN (JOSEPH M. CALIMERI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
BRAUTIGAM & BRAUTIGAM, LLP, FREDONIA (DARYL P. BRAUTIGAM OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Stephen W. Cass, A.J.), entered May 29, 2015. The order, among other things, denied in part the motion of defendant Pamela Lodestro, individually, and as executor of the Estate of G. Marvin Schuver, to dismiss the amended complaint against her.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: November 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,537
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,949
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        365
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,122
<PP&E>                                         556,296
<DEPRECIATION>                                 160,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 450,926
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,867
<BONDS>                                         23,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        100
<COMMON>                                         2,921
<OTHER-SE>                                     373,377
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   450,926
<SALES>                                         92,581
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               128,737
<CGS>                                           53,869
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  115,743
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,411
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,920
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,994
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,384)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,860
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,860
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
        

</TABLE>
# HDCVTEMP_UNS
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment
      Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certifies
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
      Michael M.
      Schurer


Michael
      M. Schurer


Chief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer


(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)


August
      11, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1123 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1123

To amend title 28, United States Code, to modify the composition of the 
     eastern judicial district of Arkansas, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2019

 Mr. Crawford (for himself, Mr. Westerman, Mr. Womack, and Mr. Hill of 
  Arkansas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to modify the composition of the 
     eastern judicial district of Arkansas, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Divisional Realignment for the 
Eastern District of Arkansas Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REALIGNMENT OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS.

    Section 83(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended to read 
as follows:
``Eastern District
    ``(a) The Eastern District comprises three divisions.
            ``(1) The Central Division comprises the counties of 
        Cleburne, Cleveland, Conway, Dallas, Drew, Faulkner, Grant, 
        Jefferson, Lincoln, Lonoke, Perry, Pope, Prairie, Pulaski, 
        Saline, Stone, Van Buren, White, and Yell.
Court for the Central Division shall be held at Little Rock.
            ``(2) The Delta Division comprises the counties of 
        Arkansas, Chicot, Crittenden, Desha, Lee, Monroe, Phillips, and 
        St. Francis.
Court for the Delta Division shall be held at Helena.
            ``(3) The Northern Division comprises the counties of Clay, 
        Craighead, Cross, Fulton, Greene, Independence, Izard, Jackson, 
        Lawrence, Mississippi, Poinsett, Randolph, Sharp, and Woodruff.
Court for the Northern Division shall be held at Jonesboro.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendment made by this Act shall take effect on 
the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Lon* Star 

Milk Producers 

October 25, 2022 

Via electronic mail to: Daua.coa/e@usda.gov 

Ms. Dana Coale, Deputy Administrator 

Agricultural Marketing Service 

United States Department of Agriculture 

USDA-AMS-1400 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, D.C. 20250-0225 

Re: Request for a hearing to amend Federal Milk Marketing Orders 5, 6, and 7 

Dear Ms. Coale, 

This letter confirms the support of Lone Star Milk Producers, Inc. for a hearing to amend 

the southeastern US federal milk orders as requested by DCMA in the request letter from 

Attorney Marvin Beshore. This further confirms our support for the five proposals submitted 

with the hearing request. We respectfully request that a hearing be held on an emergency basis 

to expedite the relief requested to our orders. 

Thank you. 

Jeffrey F. Sims 

Secretary and Chief Market Analysis Officer
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 24553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9757]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>13050 and <greek-i>13051]


Kentucky Disaster Number KY-00045

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of 
Kentucky (FEMA-4057-DR), dated 03/16/2012.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Straight-line Winds, and 
Flooding.
    Incident Period: 02/29/2012 through 03/03/2012.

DATES: Effective Date: 04/12/2012.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/15/2012.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/17/2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the Commonwealth of 
KENTUCKY, dated 03/16/2012, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties:
    Adair, Bath.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-9757 Filed 4-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 31.2  Sarbanes - Oxley Section 302 Certification  I, James J. Judge, certify that:1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of NSTAR Electric Company;2.Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of NSTAR Electric Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;4.NSTAR Electric Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for NSTAR Electric Company and we have:a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to NSTAR Electric Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b)evaluated the effectiveness of NSTAR Electric Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, based on such evaluation; andc)disclosed in this annual report any change in NSTAR Electric Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, NSTAR Electric Companys internal control over financial reporting.5.NSTAR Electric Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to NSTAR Electric Company's auditors and the audit committee of NSTAR's board of trustees:a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect NSTAR Electric Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in NSTAR Electric Company's internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  March  14, 2007By:/s/ JAMES J. JUDGE
James J. Judge
Senior Vice President, Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-60350

Summary Calendar

INDERJIT SINGH; AMANJOT SINGH BASSI,

Petitioners

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A087 454 748

BIA. No. A087 454 749

Before SMITH, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Inderjit Singh and his son, Amanjot Singh Bassi, are natives and citizens 

of India who entered this country without authorization and were ordered 

removed. Singh petitions this court for review of an order of the Board of 

Immigration Appeals (BIA) upholding the Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s) 

determination that he was not entitled to asylum, withholding of removal, or 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 13, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-60350 Document: 00513002027 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/13/2015
No. 14-60350

protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) because his claims 

were not credible.1 He argues that he explained many of the discrepancies that 

were in his testimony and that existed between his testimony and written 

items. He also complains that he was not given an opportunity to explain 

another inconsistency and insists that his testimony was both credible and 

sufficient to support his request for relief. 

We “review only the BIA’s decision, unless the IJ’s decision has some 

impact on” that decision. Wang v. Holder, 569 F.3d 531, 536 (5th Cir. 2009). 

We review the factual determination that an alien is not eligible for asylum, 

withholding of removal, or CAT relief under the substantial evidence standard. 

See Chen v. Gonzales, 470 F.3d 1131, 1134 (5th Cir. 2006). Under this

standard, we may not reverse an immigration court’s factual findings unless 

“the evidence was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could conclude 

against it.” Wang, 569 F.3d at 537.

An adverse credibility determination may be supported by “any

inconsistency or omission,” provided that “the totality of the circumstances 

establishes that an asylum applicant is not credible.” Id. at 538 (internal 

quotation marks and citation omitted). Our review of the record as a whole 

shows that the evidence does not compel a conclusion contrary to that reached 

by the IJ and BIA on the issue whether Singh was credible. See id. at 537. 

Consequently, his petition for review is DENIED. 

1 Bassi was a derivative applicant with respect to Singh’s application for relief. 

2

 

 Case: 14-60350 Document: 00513002027 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/13/2015
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

CLAUDE DESCARDES,

 Cross-Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 779 MAL 2014

Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 2015, the Cross Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          20,504
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,374
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,847
<PP&E>                                         472,095
<DEPRECIATION>                                 124,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 406,374
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,595
<BONDS>                                        119,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        100
<COMMON>                                         2,390
<OTHER-SE>                                     243,646
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   406,374
<SALES>                                         41,056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,720
<CGS>                                           30,330
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,447
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,786
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 389
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,273
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,338)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,263
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,263
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON D.C ., 20460 

OFFICE OF 

PREVENTION, PESTICIDES, AND 

TOXIC SUBSTANCES 

February 18, 2010 

Andrew S . Hartten 

Project Director 

DuPont Corporate Remediation Group 

Barley Mill Plaza - Bldg . 19 

4417 Lancaster Pike 

Wilmington, DE 19805 

Attn : Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the U .S . Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) and E L DuPont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) 

for a Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) EPA notification of the Company and the 

public of the need for an extension 

Dear Mr . Hartten : 

This letter is submitted pursuant to Sections V.E .2 .m of the above-identified 

MOU which provides for EPA to request an extension to review the Response to Peer 

Consultation Panel Input and Outline of Phase III Work Plan Pursuant to the 

Memorandum of Understanding Between US EPA and DuPont Company dated 

December 18, 2009. The DuPont Response was received in my office December 18, 

2009 . The MOU provides 30 days for EPA to provide input on the Response . EPA 

obtained an additional 30 days for its review with an extension to February 18, 2010. ' 

Due to the recent unforeseen closure of the government due to weather conditions, 

EPA will need another 2 weeks to complete its review . Thus we will provide our input to 

you no later than March 4, 2010 . ^, 

emical Control Division (7405M) - 

cc: EPA Docket ID No . : OPPT-2004-0113 180 ON SNIV1N0O 

r-T 

ector " " 
Cathy Fehrenbacher - Mail Code 7406M 

Lawrence Libelo - Mail Code 7406M 

David W. Boothe 

E . I . du Pont de Nemours and Company 

4417 Lancaster Pike, CRP 708/110 

Wilmington, DE 19805
SERVED: JUNE 14, 2012**--------------~----------** IN THE MATTEROF WESTOVER CORPORATION FAADOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil PenaltyAction) FDMS NO. FAA-2012 - 0200 NOTICE OF HEARINGDATES ?[!;z 

## 3: 00

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVENthat testimony and evidence will be heard and considered onNovember29 and 30,2012, inclusive, inthe Courtroom #601 Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 90119th Street,2nd Floor, Denver CO. 80294. Hearings will commence at 9:00a.m. and conclude at 4:30p.m. each day. The parties shall vacate the courthouse onorbefore 5:00p.m. eachday.

-cllafdC. Goodwin U.S. Administrative LawJudge Attachment- Service List

1**SE~VICE** LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 fudependence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 Howard Bittman, Respondent's Counsel P.O. Box 4370 113 Spruce Street Boulder, CO 80306 TEL: 303-444-8349 FAX: 303-444-1089 Courtney Adolph, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel Western-Pacific Region, A WP-7.4 Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-7128 FAX: 310-725-6816

ONE COPY

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge Office of Hearings, M-20 .... U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant/Paralegal FAX: 202-366-7536

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0200 (Civil Penalty Action) 1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use· the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. -2-
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 12

- 00175

- CR

Matthew Ryan CAMPBELL

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CR5045

Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED May 15, 2013.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
### -83 -82 -81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76

37 38 39 40 41



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/18 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
# FY11 Purchase Data- PY

Agricultural Marketing ServiceCommodity Poultry and Egg Purchases, FY 2011October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011	

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service	Page &P or &N	For More Information Call (202) 720-4517
Fiscal Year 2022 

FGIS User Fee Accounts 

Revenue Obligations Earnings / Loss Operating 

Reserve 

U.S. Grain Standards Act 

Inspection & Weighing $31,766,362 $35,803,048 -$4,036,686 $3,036,951 

Official Agencies $386,011 $1,227,210 -$841,198 $1,201,070 

Agricultural Marketing Act 

Rice $3,261,465 $5,444,102 -$2,182,636 $3,063,037 

Commodities $2,179,524 $2,453,702 -$274,178 $1,569,203 

Fiscal Year 2022 Total $37,593,362 $44,928,062 -$7,334,698 $8,870,261 

Dated: 11/21/2022
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

_______________________________________ )

FLORIDA INDEPENDENT COLLEGES )

AND UNIVERSITIES RISK )

MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, INC. )

)

Plaintiff

, )

)

v. )

) Civil No. 09

- 1930 (RCL)

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and )

THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, )

)

Defendants. )

_______________________________________)

ORDER

Before t he Court are the parties’ cross

- motions for summary judgment [16] [17]

. For the

reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED ; and it is

further

ORDERED that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED

.

Judgment shall be entered for the defendant s , dismissing this case with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Signed by Royce C. Lamberth, Chief Judge, on March 22, 2012.