alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
For Immediate Release                                           May 14, 2003

    Snow Contributed to Third Quarter Earnings Decline at Bowl America

Bowl America Incorporated reported that per share earnings for its third
quarter, which ended March 30, 2003, declined from $.33 a year ago to $.31
During the quarter the Company operated one fewer center than last year.
In addition heavy snowstorms resulted in closings at the Company's northern
bowling centers and high snow removal costs.  Non-peak time promotions
increased the number of games bowled, but at a reduced price per game.  The
increased lineage continued into the fourth quarter.

In May, Bowl America closed its only remaining money-losing bowling center
and entered into a contract for the sale of the property for $2,300,000.
The transaction will close prior to August 30, 2003, on a date selected by
Bowl America.

The $.12 quarterly dividend paid today made this the thirty-first consecutive
year of increased dividends, a record which ranks 63rd among 11,200 companies
surveyed for Mergent's list of dividend achievers.

Bowl America operates eighteen bowling centers in Maryland, Virginia and
Florida and its stock trades on the American Stock Exchange with the symbol
BWLA.  The Company's SEC Form 10-Q is available at www.sec.gov on the
Edgar System.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or


Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code





In connection with the Quarterly Report of OHA Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2019 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven T. Wayne, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:May 14, 2019/s/ Steven T. WayneSteven T. WaynePresident and Chief Executive Officer
IB 

Union Calendar No. 197 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1123 

[Report No. 116–248] 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to modify the composition of the 

eastern judicial district of Arkansas, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2019 

Mr. CRAWFORD (for himself, Mr. WESTERMAN, Mr. WOMACK, and Mr. HILL

of Arkansas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

OCTOBER 22, 2019 

Additional sponsor: Mr. COHEN

OCTOBER 22, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1123 RH

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to modify the composition of the eastern judicial district of Arkansas, and 

for other purposes. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1123 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Divisional Realignment 

5 for the Eastern District of Arkansas Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REALIGNMENT OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF AR7 KANSAS. 

8 Section 83(a) of title 28, United States Code, is 

9 amended to read as follows: 

10 ‘‘Eastern District 

11 ‘‘(a) The Eastern District comprises three divisions. 

12 ‘‘(1) The Central Division comprises the coun13 ties of Cleburne, Cleveland, Conway, Dallas, Drew, 

14 Faulkner, Grant, Jefferson, Lincoln, Lonoke, Perry, 

15 Pope, Prairie, Pulaski, Saline, Stone, Van Buren, 

16 White, and Yell. 

17 Court for the Central Division shall be held at Little Rock. 

18 ‘‘(2) The Delta Division comprises the counties 

19 of Arkansas, Chicot, Crittenden, Desha, Lee, Mon20 roe, Phillips, and St. Francis. 

21 Court for the Delta Division shall be held at Helena. 

22 ‘‘(3) The Northern Division comprises the coun23 ties of Clay, Craighead, Cross, Fulton, Greene, Inde24 pendence, Izard, Jackson, Lawrence, Mississippi, 

25 Poinsett, Randolph, Sharp, and Woodruff. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
4 

•HR 1123 RH

1 Court for the Northern Division shall be held at 

2 Jonesboro.’’. 

3 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

4 This Act and the amendment made by this Act shall 

5 take effect on the date of enactment of this Act. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 197 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1123 

[Report No. 116–248] 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to modify 

Arkansas, and for other purposes. the composition of the eastern judicial district of 

OCTOBER 22, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
STATE FARM MUTUAL 

AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Appellant,

v.

HEATHER SPEARS AND 

BRANDI GUNTER,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3613

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 14, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Hugh A. Carithers, Judge.

Rhonda B. Boggess, and Gina P. Grimsley of Taylor, Day, Grimm & Boyd, 

Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Gregory W. Lineberry and Bradley M. Latone of Holbrook Law, Jacksonville, and 

Paul R. Regensdorf, High Springs, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., MARSTILLER, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

R.M.,

 Respondent

 v.

E.M.,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 915 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, the

Application for Leave to File a Supplement, and the Application for Leave to File a

Response are DENIED.
NICHOLAS “NICO” LAHOOD

Criminal District Attorney

Bexar County, Texas 

April 13, 2015 

Honorable Keith E, Hottle, Clerk

Fourth Court of Appeals District 

Cadena-Reeves Justice Center 

300 Dolorosa, Suite 3200

San Antonio, Texas 78205 

RE: Eberto A. Mendez v. The State of Texas

 Appellate Case No. 04-14-00916-CR

Trial Court Case No. 2009-CR-2760 

Dear Mr. Hottle: 

The Appellants counsel in the instant case has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738,87 S. Ct. 1402,18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). It is asserted therein 

that no reversible error exists in the instant case. The State waives the right to file an 

Appellee’s brief in response at this time, however, stands ready to respond should the 

Court find it necessary. 

Thank you in advance for your consideration. 

Sincerely yours, 

/s/ Mary Beth Welsh

Mary Beth Welsh 

Assistant Criminal District Attorney

Bexar County, Texas 

Paul Elizondo Tower 

101 W. Nueva 

(210) 335-2782

S.B.N. 00785215 cc: Richard B. Dulany, Jr. 

mwelsh@bexar.org Assistant Public Defender

 101 W. Nueva St., Suite 310 

 San Antonio, Texas 78205 

Attorney for the State

ACCEPTED

04-14-00916-CR

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

4/13/2015 2:26:25 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 4/13/2015 2:26:25 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
EXHIBIT 32
 
  Certification Pursuant To
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Borden Chemical, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
  
 /s/ Craig O. Morrison       /s/ William H. Carter_______
 Craig O. Morrison        William H. Carter
 Chief Executive Officer     Chief Financial Officer
  March 29, 2004 March 29, 2004
 
 
  
 
 A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Borden Chemical, Inc. and will be retained by Borden Chemical, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Harpreet Singh Sangha, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date:  April 19, 2006 | /s/ Harpreet Singh Sangha
Harpreet Singh Sangha
Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1444. CHRISTOPHER B. THOMAS v. THE STATE.

In 1996, a jury found Christopher B. Thomas guilty of kidnapping and armed

robbery. The trial court sentenced him to twenty years to serve on the kidnapping

count and ten years to serve on the armed robbery count, to run consecutively. We

affirmed Thomas’s convictions on appeal. Thomas v. State, 238 Ga. App. 42 (517

SE2d 585) (1999). In 2015, Thomas filed a motion to correct a void sentence,

arguing that, in the absence of aggravating factors, the law required his sentences to

run concurrently, rather than consecutively. The trial court denied the motion, and

Thomas appeals. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

Although a direct appeal may lie from an order denying a motion to correct a

void sentence, a defendant must raise a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact,

void or illegal. See Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786) (2009);

Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). A sentence is void only

if it imposes punishment that the law does not allow. Crumbley v. State, 261 Ga. 610,

611 (a) (409 SE2d 517) (1991). “Motions to vacate a void sentence generally are

limited to claimsthat – even assuming the existence and validity of the conviction for

which the sentence was imposed – the law does not authorize that sentence, most

typically because it exceeds the most severe punishment for which the applicable

penal statute provides.” Von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 572 (2) (748 SE2d 446)

(2013).

April 09, 2015
Because it is well-established that “whether to impose consecutive or

concurrent sentences for multiple offenses is within the trial court’s discretion,”

Simpson v. State, 310 Ga. App. 63, 64 n. 4 (715 SE2d 675) (2011), Thomas has not

raised a colorable void sentence claim. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

2

04/09/2015
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Federal Bureau of Investigation

# AGENCY:

Federal Bureau of Investigation.

# ACTION:

Notice; Correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Bureau of Investigation published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of April 3, 2012, concerning the date and location of the National Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact Council (Council) created by the National Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact Act of 1998 (Compact). The document listed the wrong street address.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Skeeter J. Murray, (304) 625-3518.

                        Correction in the                         **Federal Register**                         of April 3, 2012, in 77 FR 20051, first column, correct the hotel address line in                         **ADDRESSES**                         to read: 300 East Travis.                    

Dated: April 10, 2012.

Gary S. Barron,

FBI Compact Officer, Criminal Justice Information Services Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation.

[FR Doc. 2012-9216 Filed 4-16-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

  <ARTICLE>        5
  <MULTIPLIER>     1,000
         
  <S>                               <C>
  <PERIOD-TYPE>                     YEAR
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1997
  <PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1997
  <PERIOD-END>                      DEC-31-1997
  <CASH>                            1644
  <SECURITIES>                      0
  <RECEIVABLES>                     2973
  <ALLOWANCES>                      82
  <INVENTORY>                       181
  <CURRENT-ASSETS>                  5239
  <PP&E>                            7381
  <DEPRECIATION>                    1274
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                    13216
  <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             3536
  <BONDS>                           1500
  <COMMON>                          3006
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0
  <PREFERRED>                       0
  <OTHER-SE>                        5173
  <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      13216
  <SALES>                           11885
  <TOTAL-REVENUES>                  11142
  <CGS>                             13251
  <TOTAL-COSTS>                     15720
  <OTHER-EXPENSES>                  2
  <LOSS-PROVISION>                  0
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                30
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                   (4610)
  <INCOME-TAX>                      0
  <INCOME-CONTINUING>               (4610)
  <DISCONTINUED>                    0
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
  <CHANGES>                         0
  <NET-INCOME>                      (4610)
  <EPS-PRIMARY>                     (.16)
  <EPS-DILUTED>                     (.16)
          
  
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

                    In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Copano Energy, L.L.C. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 15, 2005, I, John R. Eckel, Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

                                                             (1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

 

                                                             (2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| August 15, 2005 | /s/ JOHN R. ECKEL, JR.                            |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|            | John R. Eckel, Jr.                                |
|            | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Business and Operations Advisory Committee (9556).                    

*Dates:*                         Date/Time:                    

May 8, 2012; 1 p.m. to 6 p.m. (EST),

May 9, 2012; 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. (EST).

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Stafford I, Room 1235.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Joan Miller, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 292-8200.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice concerning issues related to the oversight, integrity, development and enhancement of NSF's business operations.                    

## Agenda

### May 8, 2012

Welcome/Introductions; BFA/OIRM Overview; Challenges to Reduce Costs and Identify Efficiencies—Introduction, Panel/Discussion; Change Management/Effect on Employee Morale.

### May 9, 2012

Business System Review Subcommittee; Recompetition of Major Research Facilities Subcommittee; Update on Sub Committees; Prepare for Meeting with NSF Deputy Director; Discussion with Deputy Director; Closing Discussion.

Date: April 17, 2012.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-9536 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nasr Abdul Aziz, Also Known as Raymond Gilliard, Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eve Preminger, J.), rendered on November 19, 1985, convicting defendant after a jury trial of four counts of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent, indeterminate prison terms of from 10 to 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was charged in three separate indictments with subway token booth robberies. The four robberies were similar in the choice of location and as to the manner in which the robbery was carried out. In each robbery defendant selected a subway token booth in upper Manhattan. Although defendant worked with one or more accomplices the defendant was the gunman and leader in each robbery. Furthermore, the procedure was almost identical in each robbery; waiting for the token clerks to change shifts. The indictments were properly consolidated on the grounds that they were "defined by the same or similar statutory provisions and consequently are the same or similar in law” (CPL 200.20 [2] [c]). In addition, although these were different criminal transactions, proof of one was "material and admissible as evidence in chief upon a trial of the” others (CPL 200.20 [2] [b]).

Defendant was not prejudiced by the introduction into evidence of a brown vinyl bag and collectively eleven token bags and two coin bags as the court gave appropriate curative instructions.

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Kassal, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.