alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit (21)
                                                                    ------------


                         2003 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
                         -------------------------------

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
                           ---------------------------

All of the Registrant's subsidiaries as of September 30, 2003, are listed below.
Subsidiaries of a subsidiary are indented. All subsidiaries are included in the
consolidated financial statements of the Registrant.

                                                State Or          Percentage of
                                             Jurisdiction of         Voting
                                              Organization      Securities Owned
                                            -----------------   ----------------

Dixon Ticonderoga, Inc.                            Canada             100%

   Grupo Dixon, S.A. de C.V.  (50.1%
   Subsidiary of Dixon Ticonderoga, Inc.)          Mexico              97%

      Dixon Ticonderoga de Mexico, S.A. de
      C.V.  (Subsidiary of Grupo Dixon, S.A.       Mexico             100%
      de C.V.)

      Dixon Comercializadora Dixon, S.A. de
      C.V. (Subsidiary of Grupo Dixon, S.A.        Mexico             100%
      de C.V.)

      Servidix, S.A. de C.V.  (Subsidiary of
      Grupo Dixon, S.A. de C.V.)                   Mexico             100%

Dixon Industrial Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (a)          Mexico             100%

Beijing Dixon Ticonderoga Stationery               China              100%
Company, Ltd.

Ticonderoga Graphite, Inc. (a)                    New York            100%

Dixon Europe, Limited                          United Kingdom         100%



(a)  Inactive
Fiscal Year 2019 

Inspection & Weighing Program

Revenue Operating 

Expense Earnings / Loss Metric Tons

National $6,513,516 $6,836,376 -$322,859 107,898,402

Field Offices

Portland Field Office $192,626 $329,221 -$136,595 2,530,648

Toledo Field Office $220,159 $236,158 -$15,999 1,597,584

New Orleans Field Office $1,419,037 $1,517,733 -$98,696 57,807,378

League City Field Office $548,971 $755,374 -$206,403 7,939,994

Export Hourly & Inspection Fees $21,777,671 $26,815,534 -$5,037,863 n/a

Non-Export Hourly & Inspection Fees1 $1,220,157 $1,419,793 -$199,636 n/a

Program Total $31,892,137 $37,910,189 -$6,018,052 n/a

1

Includes revenue and operating expenses for domestic field offices, scale testing programs, registration program, and 

Technology & Science Division.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7823

OMAR AL-MUWWAKIL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

OFFICER PUTMAN, Greensville Correctional Center; MEDICAL STAFF, Greensville Correctional

Center; GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER; M. A.

TIDWELL, B-Unit Warden; JOHN M. JABE, Chief

Warden,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-94-1193-2)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 28, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Omar Al-Muwwakil, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Theresa Bowers, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Al-Muwwakil v. Putman, No. CA-94-1193-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 23,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NO. 03-14-00723-CR

MARK FRUGE * IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appellant *

VS. * OF THE THIRD

* SUPREME JUDICIAL

* DISTRICT OF TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS *

Appellee * AT AUSTIN TEXAS

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

APPELLATE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, Appellant, and files this Motion for an Extension in which to

file the Appellant’s Brief. In support of this motion, appellant shows the Court the

following:

I.

The Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Travis County, Texas of

the offense of aggravated assault. Appellant was assessed life in TDCJ. 

II.

The deadline for filing the Appellant’s Brief is May 18, 2015 and Appellant has

requested one previous extensions.

III.

Attorney for the Appellant would further show the Court that he has been

ACCEPTED

03-14-00723-CR

5350336

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

5/19/2015 9:43:04 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/19/2015 9:43:04 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
diligent in preparing Appellee’s brief in this case. Due to a very busy docket counsel

is unable to complete the brief within the time frame. Counsel requests an extension

of time so that he may adequately prepare Appellant’s Brief. Counsel must complete

his investigation of the record and draft the brief. 

WHEREFORE, Appellant prays the Court grant this Motion and extend the

deadline for filing the Appellant’s Brief to June 22, 2015. 

Respectfully Submitted,

ARIEL PAYAN

Attorney at Law

1012 Rio Grande

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 478-3900

(512) 472-4102 (fax)

Arielpayan@hotmail.com

 /s/ Ariel Payan 

ARIEL PAYAN

State Bar No. 00794430

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

By my signature above, I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above

and foregoing Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellate Brief has been delivered

to the Criminal District Attorney of said County Texas, on May 18, 2015.
# Data

 ^, &D	

# New Figure 18

U.S. $/metric ton

                                                   U.S.  Gulf     PNW       Spread                                                  Ocean rates July '23                    $46.13       $25.44      $20.69 Change from July '22                   -34.9%     -38.4%     -30.0%      Change from 4-year average        -23.8%     -23.7%     -23.8%  

# Figure 18 Redesign

U.S. $/metric ton

# Figure 18 table
.. 

SERVED: JUNE 11,2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

. IN THE MATTER OF 

MIDWEST JET CHARTER, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Case) 

DMS FAA-2012-0029 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

·<>.-

On February 16, 2012, the Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") filed 

a Complaint. On January 28, 2012, Midwest Jet Charter, Inc. ("Respondent") had filed a 

Request for Hearing. 

On June 4, 2012, Respondent withdrew its request for hearing. 

14 C.P.R.§ 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency 

attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for-a hearing 

without the consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney 

withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the 

answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this 

subpart with prejudice." 
2 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal of Request for Hearing having been 

read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Respondent's Withdrawal of Request for Hearing be and is hereby 

granted; ·and ... 

2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

~tlJ('_~IA Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
• 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Tim Lodes 

Director of Human Resources 

Midwest Jet Charter, Inc. 

4216 Dewitt Avenue 

Mattoon, IL 6193 8 

TEL: 217-236-7102 

FAJ{: 217-235-0573 

ONE COPY 

Briana Martino, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AGL-7 

Great Lakes Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

TEL: 847-294-7313 

FAJ{: 847-294-7498 

The Honorable Richard C. Q()odwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAJ{: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0029 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Doumbas, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2019-Ohio-3206.] 

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. DOUMBAS. 

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Doumbas, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 

2019-Ohio-3206.] 

(No. 2016-1149—Submitted August 6, 2019—Decided August 12, 2019.) 

ON PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 

____________________ 

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing on 

February 28, 2019, of a petition for reinstatement by respondent, Marc George 

Doumbas, Attorney Registration No. 0074028. In accordance with Gov.Bar R. 

V(25)(E), respondent’s petition for reinstatement was referred to the Board of 

Professional Conduct. The board filed its final report with this court on June 14, 

2019, recommending that respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. 

No objections to said final report were filed, and this cause was considered by the 

court. 

{¶ 2} Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by this court that the 

petition for reinstatement of respondent is granted and that respondent, Marc 

George Doumbas, last known address in Avon Lake, Ohio, is reinstated to the 

practice of law in Ohio. 

{¶ 3} It is further ordered by the court that respondent be taxed the costs of 

these proceedings in the amount of $772.11, less the deposit of $500.00, for a 

total balance due of $272.11 payable, by cashier’s check or money order, by 

respondent on or before 90 days from the date of this order. If costs are not paid 

on or before 90 days from the date of this order, interest at the rate of 10 percent 

per annum will accrue until costs are paid in full. It is further ordered that if costs 

are not paid in full on or before 90 days from the date of this order, the matter 

may be referred to the attorney general for collection and respondent may be 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2

found in contempt and suspended until all costs and accrued interest are paid in 

full. It is further ordered that respondent is liable for all collections costs pursuant 

to R.C. 131.02 if the debt is certified to the attorney general for collection. 

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 

of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be 

made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2). 

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Doumbas, 149 Ohio 

St.3d 628, 2017-Ohio-550, 76 N.E.3d 1185.

O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FRENCH, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY,

and STEWART, JJ., concur. 

________________________
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13A-14**

**PROMULGATED UNDER**

**SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Laurie Romanak, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CB Richard Ellis Realty Trust; 

2. Based onmy knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; and 

(b) [Omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986, Section III E.] 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 15, 2007 

 

33
Exhibit 32.1

              Certification Of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant To
                 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ABC Funding, Inc. (the "Company") for
the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Alan Gaines, as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Richard Cohen, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,
respectively, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


Dated: May 11, 2007                   By: /s/ Alan Gaines
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Alan Gaines, Chief Executive Officer
                                          ABC Funding, Inc.


Dated: May 11, 2007                   By: /s/ Richard Cohen
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Richard Cohen, Chief Financial Officer
                                          ABC Funding, Inc.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLOR957000-L63100000-HD0000: HAG12-0168]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The plats of survey of the following described lands are scheduled to be officially filed in the Bureau of Land Management Oregon/Washington State Office, Portland, Oregon, 30 days from the date of this publication.

## WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN

## Oregon

T. 12 S., R. 2 E., accepted April 6, 2012

T. 27 S., R. 12 W., accepted April 12, 2012

T. 39 S., R. 3 E., accepted April 12, 2012

T. 28 S., R. 11 W., accepted April 12, 2012

# ADDRESSES:

A copy of the plats may be obtained from the Land Office at the Bureau of Land Management, Oregon/Washington State Office, 333 SW. 1st Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204, upon required payment. A person or party who wishes to protest against a survey must file a notice that they wish to protest (at the above address) with the Oregon/Washington State Director, Bureau of Land Management, Portland, Oregon.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kyle Hensley, (503) 808-6124, Branch of Geographic Sciences, Bureau of Land Management, 333 SW. 1st Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.

Timothy J. Moore,

Acting Chief, Cadastral Surveyor of Oregon/Washington.

[FR Doc. 2012-9570 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
NO. 03-14-00723-CR

MARK FRUGE * IN THE COURT OF APPEALS Appellant * VS. * OF THE THIRD * SUPREME JUDICIAL * DISTRICT OF TEXAS THE STATE OF TEXAS * Appellee * AT AUSTIN TEXAS
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

APPELLATE BRIEF TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS: COMES NOW, Appellant, and files this Motion for an Extension in which to file the Appellant’s Brief. In support of this motion, appellant shows the Court the following: I
. The Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Travis County, Texas of the offense of aggravated assault. Appellant was assessed life in TDCJ. II. The deadline for filing the Appellant’s Brief is May 18, 2015 and Appellant has requested one previous extensions. III. Attorney for the Appellant would further show the Court that he has been ACCEPTED 03-14-00723-CR 5350336 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/19/2015 9:43:04 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKd i l i genti n p r e p a r in g A p p el l ee ’s b ri ef i n thi s c a se. D ue t o a veryb usy d oc k etc ounsel i s una b l e t o c omp l et e the b ri ef w i thi n the t i me f

rame. C ounsel re q uest s a n ext ensi on
o f tim e s o th a t h e m a y a d eq u a tel y p re p a re A p p el l a n t’s B rie f
. C o u n s el m u s t c o m p l ete h is in v e s ti g a ti o n o f

th e r e c o r d a n d d r a f

t t h e b r ie f
. W H E R E F O R E , A p p el l a ntp ray s the C ourtgrant thi s M ot i on a nd ext end the d e a d l in e f

o rf ilin g th e A p p e l l a n t’ s B r ie f to J u n e 2 2 , 2 0 1 5
. Re s pe ct fu l l yS u bm i t t e d, AR I E L PA YA N A t t o rn e yatL aw 1012 Ri o G r an de A u s t i n , Te x as 78701 ( 512) 478- 3900 (5 1 2 ) 4 7 2 -4 1 0 2 (f

a x) A ri elp a y a n@ hot ma i l
. c om / s/ A ri elP a y a n AR I E L PA YA N S t at e BarN o . 00794430
CERT I F I CATE OF S ERVI CE
B ymysignatur e ab ove, I her eb yc ert i f ytha ta true a nd c orr ect cop yof the ab ove a nd f ore goi ng M ot i on f

or E xt ensi on of T i me t o F i l e A p p el l a t e B ri ef ha s b ee n d el i ver ed to th e C r im in a l D is tr ic t A tt o rn e y o f s a id C o u n ty T e x a s , o n M a y 1 8 , 2 0 1 5
.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0239 CITY OF BILLINGS,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MERCEDES A. BENNICK,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 2 3, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 13 2023

02/13/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0239