### 19375 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 67 / Tuesday, April 8, 2014 / Notices

**DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE**

**Parole Commission**

**Sunshine Act Meeting**

**TIME AND DATE :**  12:00 p.m., Thursday, April 17, 2014.

**PLACE :**  U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE., 3rd Floor, Washington, DC.

**STATUS :**  Closed.

**MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED :**  Determination on six original jurisdiction cases.

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION :**  Jacqueline Graham, Staff Assistant to the Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE., 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20530, (202) 346–7001.

Dated: April 3, 2014. J. Patricia W. Smoot, Acting General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–07913 Filed 4–4–14; 11:15 am]

**BILLING CODE 4410–31–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF LABOR**

**Office of the Secretary**

**Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB**  **Review; Comment Request; Application for Waiver of Surface**  **Sanitary Facilities Requirements**

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  The Department of Labor (DOL) is submitting the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) sponsored information collection request (ICR) titled, ‘‘Application for Waiver of Surface Sanitary Facilities Requirements,’’ to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval for continued use, without change, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Public comments on the ICR are invited.

**DATES :**  The OMB will consider all written comments that agency receives on or before May 8, 2014.

**ADDRESSES :**  A copy of this ICR with applicable supporting documentation; including a description of the likely respondents, proposed frequency of response, and estimated total burden may be obtained free of charge from the RegInfo.gov Web site at http:// www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ PRAViewICR?ref

_ nbr=201402-1219-001 (this link will only become active on the day following publication of this notice) or by contacting Michel Smyth by telephone at 202–693–4129, TTY 202– 693–8064, (these are not toll-free numbers) or by email at DOL

_PRA

_PUBLIC@dol.gov. Submit comments about this request by mail or courier to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for DOL– MSHA, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503; by Fax: 202–395–6881 (this is not a toll-free number); or by email: OIRA

_ submission@omb.eop.gov. Commenters are encouraged, but not required, to send a courtesy copy of any comments by mail or courier to the U.S. Department of Labor-OASAM, Office of the Chief Information Officer, Attn: Departmental Information Compliance Management Program, Room N1301, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210; or by email: DOL

_PRA

_PUBLIC@dol.gov.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Michel Smyth by telephone at 202–693– 4129, TTY 202–693–8064, (these are not toll-free numbers) or by email at DOL

_PRA

_PUBLIC@dol.gov. Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D).

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The DOL seeks to extend PRA authorization for the Application for Waiver of Surface Sanitary Facilities Requirements specified in regulations 30 CFR 71.403, 71.404, 75.1712–4, and 75.1712–5. MSHA regulations require a covered coal mine operator to provide bathing facilities, clothing change rooms, and sanitary flush toilet facilities in a location that is convenient for use of the miners. See CFR 71.400 through 71.402 and 75.1712–1 through .1712–3. The regulations allow an operator that is unable to meet any or all of the requirements to apply for a waiver. See 30 CFR 71.403, 71.404, 75.1712–4, and 75.1712–5. The coal mine operator files the application with the MSHA District Manager for the district in which the mine is located. The application must contain the name and address of the mine operator, name and location of the mine, and a detailed statement of the grounds on which the waiver is requested. At the same time the application is sent to the MSHA District Manager, the operator must forward a copy to the appropriate Regional Program Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, and a post copy showing the addresses of the appropriate District Manager and Regional Program Director for at least thirty (30) days on the mine bulletin board.

This information collection is subject to the PRA. A Federal agency generally cannot conduct or sponsor a collection of information, and the public is generally not required to respond to an information collection, unless it is approved by the OMB under the PRA and displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. In addition, notwithstanding any other provisions of law, no person shall generally be subject to penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information that does not display a valid Control Number. See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and 1320.6. The DOL obtains OMB approval for this information collection under Control Number 1219–0024.

OMB authorization for an ICR cannot be for more than three (3) years without renewal, and the current approval for this collection is scheduled to expire on June 30, 2014. The DOL seeks to extend PRA authorization for this information collection for three (3) more years, without any change to existing requirements. The DOL notes that existing information collection requirements submitted to the OMB receive a month-to-month extension while they undergo review. For additional substantive information about this ICR, see the related notice published in the Federal Register on December 27, 2013 (78 FR 79008).

Interested parties are encouraged to send comments to the OMB, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs at the address shown in the **ADDRESSES** section within 30 days of publication of this notice in the Federal Register . In order to help ensure appropriate consideration, comments should mention OMB Control Number 1219– 0024. The OMB is particularly interested in comments that:

• Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;

• Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;

• Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

• Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.

Agency: DOL–MSHA.


### 19376 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 67 / Tuesday, April 8, 2014 / Notices

Title of Collection: Application for Waiver of Surface Sanitary Facilities Requirements.

OMB Control Number: 1219–0024. Affected Public: Private Sector— businesses or other for-profits. Total Estimated Number of Respondents: 887.

Total Estimated Number of Responses: 887.

Total Estimated Annual Time Burden: 368 hours.

Total Estimated Annual Other Costs Burden: $4,435.

Dated: April 1, 2014. Michel Smyth, Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–07754 Filed 4–7–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4510–43–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF LABOR**

**Employment and Training Administration** 

**[TA–W–83,096]**

**Newark Recycled Paperboard Solutions; Newark Paperboard**  **Products; Greenville, Pennsylvania; Notice of Negative Determination**  **Regarding Application for Reconsideration** 

By application dated January 4, 2014 a worker requested administrative reconsideration of the Department’s negative determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of Newark Recycled Paperboard Solutions, Newark Paperboard Products, Greenville, Pennsylvania (subject firm) to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA). The negative determination was issued on November 13, 2013, and the Department’s Notice of negative determination was published in the Federal Register on December 9, 2013 (78 FR 73888). The subject workers produce recycled paperboard tubes and cores. Workers are not separately identifiable by product line.

The negative determination was issued because the subject firm did not shift to a foreign country production of articles like or directly competitive with the recycled paperboard tubes and cores produced by the workers at the subject firm; the subject firm did not, during the relevant period, increase imports of articles like or directly competitive with the recycled paperboard tubes and cores produced by the workers at the subject firm; declining customers of the subject firm did not, during the relevant period, increase imports of articles like or directly competitive with the recycled paperboard tubes and cores produced by the workers of the subject firm; the subject firm was not a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a worker group eligible to apply for TAA, per Section 222(b) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (the Act); and the subject firm was not identified by name by the International Trade Commission, per Section 222(e) of the Act.

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c), administrative reconsideration may be granted under the following circumstances:

(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered that the determination complained of was

erroneous;

(2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or

(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the decision.

The request for reconsideration asserts that, due to the closure of two facilities that employed worker groups who are eligible to apply for TAA (TA– W–80,495 and TA–W–81,155), the costs of shipping of raw material to the Newark, Pennsylvania facility has increased, that ‘‘several of our customers have already been transferred to Canada’’ and that another customer (Aurubis) was scheduled to transfer to Canada. The request concludes that the increased costs of raw material and the customers’ decision to shift operations to Canada have ‘‘directly affected’’ employment at the subject firm.

After careful review of the request for reconsideration, the support documentation, and previously submitted materials, the Department determines that there is no new information that supports a finding that Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974 was satisfied and that no mistake or misinterpretation of the facts or of the law with regards to the number or proportion of workers separated from the subject firm during the relevant period.

During the initial investigation, the Department took into consideration the aforementioned certifications, inquired into imports of recycled paperboard tubes and cores (and like or directly competitive articles) by both the subject firm and the firm’s major declining customers, inquired whether the subject firm shifted to a foreign country the production of recycled paperboard tubes and cores (and like or directly competitive articles) or acquired such production from a foreign country, considered whether or not the workersof the subject firm are secondarilyaffected workers, and reviewed the International Trade Commission’s findings, and did not find that such activity occurred during the relevant period.

The Department notes that, for purposes of the Act, the shift of customers’ operations to a foreign country is not a basis for certification.

Conclusion

After review of the application and investigative findings, I conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of March 2014. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014–07743 Filed 4–7–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF LABOR**

**Employment and Training Administration** 

**Investigations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment**  **Assistance**

Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section 221(a) of the Act.

The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved.

The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than April 18, 2014.

Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the