Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 24, 2012 / Notices 24461 

protective orders (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation, 

which is subject to sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended. 

Dated: April 17, 2012. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9819 Filed 4–23–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–122–853] 

Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts 

From Canada: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On February 7, 2012, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on citric 

acid and certain citrate salts from 

Canada. The review covers one 

manufacturer/exporter of the subject 

merchandise: Jungbunzlauer Canada 

Inc. (JBL Canada). The period of review 

(POR) is May 1, 2010, through April 30, 

2011. 

No interested party submitted 

comments on the preliminary results. 

We have made no changes to the margin 

calculation for the final results of this 

review. Therefore, the final results do 

not differ from the preliminary results. 

The final weighted-average dumping 

margin for JBL Canada is listed below in 

the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of 

this notice. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rebecca Trainor or Kate Johnson, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 2, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–4007 or (202) 482– 

4929, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The review covers one manufacturer/ 

exporter of the subject merchandise: JBL 

Canada. 

On February 7, 2012, the Department 

published in the Federal Register the 

preliminary results of administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on citric acid and certain citrate salts 

from Canada. See Citric Acid and 

Certain Citrate Salts from Canada: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR 6061 

(February 7, 2012) (Preliminary Results). 

We invited parties to comment on the 

preliminary results of the review. No 

interested party submitted comments. 

The Department has conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The scope of this order includes all 

grades and granulation sizes of citric 

acid, sodium citrate, and potassium 

citrate in their unblended forms, 

whether dry or in solution, and 

regardless of packaging type. The scope 

also includes blends of citric acid, 

sodium citrate, and potassium citrate; as 

well as blends with other ingredients, 

such as sugar, where the unblended 

form(s) of citric acid, sodium citrate, 

and potassium citrate constitute 40 

percent or more, by weight, of the blend. 

The scope of this order also includes all 

forms of crude calcium citrate, 

including dicalcium citrate 

monohydrate, and tricalcium citrate 

tetrahydrate, which are intermediate 

products in the production of citric 

acid, sodium citrate, and potassium 

citrate. The scope of this order does not 

include calcium citrate that satisfies the 

standards set forth in the United States 

Pharmacopeia and has been mixed with 

a functional excipient, such as dextrose 

or starch, where the excipient 

constitutes at least 2 percent, by weight, 

of the product. The scope of this order 

includes the hydrous and anhydrous 

forms of citric acid, the dihydrate and 

anhydrous forms of sodium citrate, 

otherwise known as citric acid sodium 

salt, and the monohydrate and 

monopotassium forms of potassium 

citrate. Sodium citrate also includes 

both trisodium citrate and monosodium 

citrate, which are also known as citric 

acid trisodium salt and citric acid 

monosodium salt, respectively. Citric 

acid and sodium citrate are classifiable 

under 2918.14.0000 and 2918.15.1000 of 

the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS), respectively. 

Potassium citrate and crude calcium 

citrate are classifiable under 

2918.15.5000 and 3824.90.9290 of the 

HTSUS, respectively. Blends that 

include citric acid, sodium citrate, and 

potassium citrate are classifiable under 

3824.90.9290 of the HTSUS. Although 

the HTSUS subheadings are provided 

for convenience and customs purposes, 

the written description of the 

merchandise is dispositive. 

Period of Review 

The POR is May 1, 2010, through 

April 30, 2011. 

Final Results of the Review 

We determine that a weighted-average 

dumping margin exists for JBL Canada 

for the period May 1, 2010, through 

April 30, 2011, as follows: 

Manufacturer/exporter Percent 

margin 

Jungbunzlauer Canada Inc ............ 2.34 

Assessment Rates 

The Department shall determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Pursuant to 

19 CFR 356.8(a), the Department intends 

to issue appropriate appraisement 

instructions for the respondent subject 

to this review directly to CBP 41 days 

after the date of publication of the final 

results of this review. 

For those sales where JBL Canada 

reported the entered value of its U.S. 

sales, we calculated importer-specific 

ad valorem duty assessment rates based 

on the ratio of the total amount of 

antidumping duties calculated for the 

examined sales to the total entered 

value of the examined sales to that 

importer. For those sales where the 

respondent did not know the entered 

value or importer of its U.S. sales, we 

calculated customer-specific per-unit 

duty assessment rates by aggregating the 

total amount of antidumping duties 

calculated for the examined sales and 

dividing this amount by the total 

quantity of those sales. To determine 

whether the per-unit duty assessment 

rates are de minimis, in accordance with 

the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), we calculated customerspecific ad valorem ratios based on the 

estimated entered value. 

We will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review if any 

importer-specific assessment rate 

calculated in the final results of this 

review is above de minimis (i.e., at or 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

24462 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 79 / Tuesday, April 24, 2012 / Notices 

1See Certain Steel Nails from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results and Final 

Rescission of the Second Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 77 FR 12556 (March 1, 

2012) and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum (‘‘Final Results’’). 

2Certified Products International Inc., Chiieh 

Yungs Metal Ind. Corp., Huanghua Jinhai Hardware 

Products Co., Ltd., Tianjin Jinghai County Hongli 

Industry & Business Co., Ltd. (‘‘Hongli’’), Tianjin 

Jinchi Metal Products Co., Ltd. (‘‘Jinchi’’), 

Shangdong Dinglong Import & Export Co., Ltd., 

Tianjin Zhonglian Metals Ware Co., Ltd., Hengshui 

Mingyao Hardware & Mesh Products Co., Ltd., 

Huanghua Xionghua Hardware Products, Shanghai 

Jade Shuttle Hardware Tools Co., Ltd., Shanghai 

Yueda Nails Industry Co., Ltd., Shanxi Tianli 

Industries Co., Ltd., China Staple Enterprise 

(Tianjin) Co., Ltd., Qidong Liang Chyuan Metal 

Industry Co., Ltd., Romp (Tianjin) Hardware Co., 

Ltd., CYM (Nanjing) Ningquan Nail Manufacture 

Co., Ltd. a.k.a. CYM (Nanjing), Nail Manufacture 

Co., Ltd., Shanxi Pioneer Hardware Industrial Co., 

Ltd., and Mingguang Abundant Hardware 

Productions Co., Ltd. (collectively ‘‘IBP et al.’’). 

3The Stanley Works (Langfang) Fastening 

Systems Co., Ltd. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc./ 

Stanley Fastening Systems, LP (collectively 

‘‘Stanley’’). 

4Mid Continent Nail Corporation. 

above 0.50 percent). Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate without regard to antidumping 

duties any entries for which the 

assessment rate is de minimis (i.e., less 

than 0.50 percent). The final results of 

this review shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise covered by the 

final results of this review and for future 

deposits of estimated duties, where 

applicable. 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment 

Policy Notice). This clarification will 

apply to entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by the 

company included in these final results 

of review for which the reviewed 

company did not know that the 

merchandise it sold to the intermediary 

(e.g., a reseller, trading company, or 

exporter) was destined for the United 

States. In such instances, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed 

entries at the all-others rate effective 

during the POR if there is no rate for the 

intermediary involved in the 

transaction. See Assessment Policy 

Notice for a full discussion of this 

clarification. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for the company 

listed above will be that established in 

the final results of this review, except if 

the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, 

therefore, de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in 

which case the cash deposit rate will be 

zero; (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not 

participating in this review, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recent period; (3) if the exporter is 

not a firm covered in this review, a 

previous review, or the original lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but 

the manufacturer is, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate established for the 

most recent period for the manufacturer 

of the merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other manufacturers 

or exporters will continue to be 23.21 

percent, the all-others rate made 

effective by the LTFV investigation. See 

Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts 

from Canada and the People’s Republic 

of China: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 

FR 25703 (May 29, 2009). These deposit 

requirements shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this review period. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Secretary’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This administrative review and notice 

are published in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.221. 

Dated: April 17, 2012. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9826 Filed 4–23–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–909] 

Certain Steel Nails From the People’s 

Republic of China: Amended Final 

Results of the Second Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 24, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Ricardo Martinez Rivera, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 9, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4532. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 1, 2012, the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published 

the final results of the second 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain steel 

nails (‘‘steel nails’’) from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 On March 

5, 2012, certain mandatory and separate 

rate respondents, as well as Itochu 

Building Products Co., Inc. (‘‘IBP’’),2

and Stanley 3 filed timely allegations 

that the Department made ministerial 

errors in the Final Results and 

requested, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224, 

that the Department correct the alleged 

ministerial errors. On March 12, 2012, 

Petitioner 4 submitted comments 

rebutting the errors alleged by IBP et al. 

and Stanley. No other party in this 

proceeding submitted comments on the 

Department’s final margin calculations. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

includes certain steel nails having a 

shaft length up to 12 inches. Certain 

steel nails include, but are not limited 

to, nails made of round wire and nails 

that are cut. Certain steel nails may be 

of one piece construction or constructed 

of two or more pieces. Certain steel nails 

may be produced from any type of steel, 

and have a variety of finishes, heads, 

shanks, point types, shaft lengths and 

shaft diameters. Finishes include, but 

are not limited to, coating in vinyl, zinc 

(galvanized, whether by electroplating 

or hot dipping one or more times), 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES