alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1199 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conduct a 

study regarding the accessibility of websites of the Department of Veterans Affairs to individuals with disabilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1199 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘VA Website Accessi3 bility Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. STUDY REGARDING THE ACCESSIBILITY OF 

5 WEBSITES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VET6 ERANS AFFAIRS TO INDIVIDUALS WITH DIS7 ABILITIES. 

8 (a) STUDY.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

9 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans 

10 Affairs shall examine all websites (including attached files 

11 and web-based applications) of the Department of Vet12 erans Affairs to determine whether such websites are ac13 cessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance with 

14 section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 

15 794d). 

16 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after com17 pleting the study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall 

18 submit a report to Congress regarding such study. The 

19 report shall include the following: 

20 (1) A list of each website, file, or web-based ap21 plication described in subsection (a) that is not ac22 cessible to individuals with disabilities in accordance 

23 with section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 

24 (29 U.S.C. 794d). 

25 (2) For each website, file, or web-based applica26 tion identified under paragraph (1), a description of 
3 

•HR 1199 EH

1 the barriers to bringing such website, file, or web2 based application into compliance with the require3 ments of such section, including barriers relating to 

4 staffing. 

5 (3) The plan of the Secretary to bring each 

6 website, file, or web-based application identified in 

7 the list under paragraph (1) into compliance with 

8 the requirements of section 508 of the Rehabilitation 

9 Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794d). 

10 (c) DEFINITION OF WEBSITE.—In this section, the 

11 term ‘‘website’’ includes a kiosk at a Department of Vet12 erans Affairs medical facility, the use of which is required 

13 to check in for scheduled appointments. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 15, 

2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1199 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to conto individuals with disabilities. websites of the Department of Veterans Affairs duct a study regarding the accessibility of
EX-10.2
ASSIGNMENT OF WORKING INTEREST

                  OFFICIAL RECORDS INSTRUMENT # 200017568 1 Pg
Vol 1096 Page 445

                         ASSIGNMENT OF WORKING INTEREST
                         ------------------------------

       THIS ASSIGNMENT made and entered into this 1st day of December, 2000, by
and between Miller Oil Properties, Inc.., as Assignor and Nova Oil, Inc., 9518 N
Chance Lane, Spokane ,WA 99218-2200, as Assignee.

WITNESSETH:

       That, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, the Assignor does hereby BARGAIN, SELL, TRANSFER and CONVEY,
without representation of warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, and
without recourse to the Assignor, unto the Assignee an undivided 49.5% working
interest, being a net revenue interest of 38.61%, in and to the oil and gas
which may be produced, saved and marketed from the Steinbach Unit #1. The legal
description being:

          Steinbach Unit #1 - 40.32 Acre Unit in the Ruth Mackey Survey,
          Abstract 47, Bastrop County Texas, RRC # 19848

       The working interest herein assigned to be subject to all costs of
drilling, mining, completing and producing operations as well as all other
costs, and to be subject to its proportionate part of all ad valorem,
production, severance and other similar taxes.

EXECUTED This 18 day of Dec., 2000.

                                        By:  /s/W. Dale Miller
                                             ---------------------------
                                             Miller Oil Properties, Inc.

State of Texas

County of Denton

The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 18th day of December,
2000, by W. Dale Miller, President of Miller Oil Properties Inc

WITNESS my hand and seal.

My Commission Expires: May 18, 2002


                                        /s/Sonya Grady
                                        ---------------
                                        Notary Public

                                        Sonya Grady
                                        Printed Name

FILED AND RECORDED
OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS

/S/Shirley Wilhelm

2000 DEC 28 08:55 AM 200017568
      MITCHELL $9.00
Shirley Wilhelm COUNTY CLERK
      BASTROP COUNTY, TEXAS
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Laurence Stephenson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date:  April 29, 2005 | /s/ Laurence StephensonLaurence Stephenson
President (Principal Executive Officer)
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christopher Hynes, Appellant.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leahy, J.), rendered November 19, 1987, convicting him of murder in the second degree and attempted robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that Justice Rosenblatt is substituted for former Justice Rubin *(see,*22 NYCRR 670.2 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his claim that certain omissions in the court’s charge deprived him of a fair trial *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the court’s charge was not improper since, taken as a whole, it adequately conveyed to the jury that the defendant’s second confession should be disregarded if they found that it was the fruit of a prior involuntary confession *(see, People v Madison,*73 NY2d 810).

The trial court properly allowed into evidence the testimony that the defendant was under arrest for unrelated charges at the time of his arrest for the crimes involved in this case. That testimony was not introduced for the purpose of establishing criminal propensity *(see, People v Ventimiglia,*52 NY2d 350; *People v Molineux,*168 NY 264). Rather, the limited evidence regarding the unrelated charges was properly admitted to rebut the possibly misleading impression created by defense counsel that the defendant was being held for a *635significant period of time at the precinct without good reason *(see, People v Fay,*85 AD2d 512; *People v Le Grand,*76 AD2d 706, 709).

The contentions raised in the defendant’s supplemental *pro se*brief are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b)
or

Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of NGP Capital Resources Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2014, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen K. Gardner, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:   August 7, 2014 | /s/ STEPHEN K. GARDNER               
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                       | Stephen K. Gardner                   
|                       | President and Chief Executive Officer
Why is there push back in several states that offer MM to lump CBD into the same category requiring Doctors Advice and prescription.   Note Ohio, Florida, Michigan Canada and Montana.

Thomas Lash
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment
      Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certifies
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Donna BrandinDonna
                BrandinChief
                Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)August
                14, 2008
# Page 1-3

&"Times New Roman,Regular"&11For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, Specialty Crop Inspection Division 		&"Times New Roman,Regular"&11August 1, 2022     Version 3.0

# Working

# Pg. 4 General Questions

&"Times New Roman,Regular"&11For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, Specialty Crop Inspection Division 		&"Times New Roman,Regular"&11August 1, 2022     Version 3.0

# Pg. 4 General Questions (2)

&"Times New Roman,Regular"&11For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, Specialty Crop Inspection Division 		&"Times New Roman,Regular"&11August 1, 2022     Version 3.0

# Part 1-Farm Review

&"Times New Roman,Regular"&11For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, Specialty Crop Inspection Division 		&"Times New Roman,Regular"&11August 1, 2022     Version 3.0

# Part 2-Field Harvest & Packing 

&"Times New Roman,Regular"&11For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, Specialty Crop Inspection Division 		&"Times New Roman,Regular"&11August 1, 2022     Version 3.0

# Part 3-House Packing Facility

&"Times New Roman,Regular"&11For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, Specialty Crop Inspection Division 		&"Times New Roman,Regular"&11August 1, 2022     Version 3.0

# Part 4-Storage & Transportation

&"Times New Roman,Regular"&11For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, Specialty Crop Inspection Division 		&"Times New Roman,Regular"&11August 1, 2022     Version 3.0

# Part 5-Preventive Food Defense

&"Times New Roman,Regular"&11For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, Specialty Crop Inspection Division 		&"Times New Roman,Regular"&11August 1, 2022     Version 3.0

# Logo Use

&"Times New Roman,Regular"&12For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, Specialty Crop Inspection Division 		&"Times New Roman,Regular"&12August 1, 2022     Version 3.0

# Audit Scoresheet

&"Times New Roman,Regular"&12For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, Specialty Crop Inspection Division 		&"Times New Roman,Regular"&12August 1, 2022     Version 3.0

# CAR Duplication Instructions

&"Times New Roman,Regular"&11For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, Specialty Crop Inspection Division 		&"Times New Roman,Regular"&11August 1, 2022     Version 3.0

#  Corrective Action Report (1)

&"Times New Roman,Regular"&11For Official Government Use OnlyUSDA, AMS, SCP, Specialty Crop Inspection Division 		&"Times New Roman,Regular"&11August 1, 2022     Version 3.0

# image1.jpeg

# image2.jpeg

# image3.jpeg

# image4.jpeg

# image5.png
# Socrata_Data

# DB barges vs UL NO barges

For the week ending March 30: 447 barges moved down river, 117 fewer than the previous week; 607 grain barges unloaded in the New Orleans Region,  6 percent fewer than the previous week.

# Redesign

# Data

# Figure text

# Sheet1
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-147 Specification

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 April 5, 2022

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 1 of 2

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Naeve Black Angus Beef Program

G-147 Specification

1 REQUIREMENTS

Beef carcasses certified under this specification shall meet the following requirements:

a. Phenotypic requirements of the American Angus Association’s (AAA) Live Animal 

Specification;

b. Classed as Steer and Heifer and carcasses only1;

c. U.S. Prime, Choice, or Select and have a marbling score of: 

i. Naeve Black Angus Ultimate Prime – Minimum marbling score of Moderately

Abundant00 or higher1;

ii. Naeve Black Angus Prime - Minimum marbling score of Slightly Abundant00 or higher1;

iii. Naeve Black Angus Premium Choice – Minimum marbling score of Modest00 or higher1;

iv. Naeve Black Angus Choice - Minimum marbling score of Small00 or higher 1;

v. Naeve Black Angus Select - Marbling score of Slight00 to Slight99 

d. Practically free (not detracting from visual quality) of capillary rupture in the ribeye muscle

e. No hump exceeding 2 inches in height2

;

and

f. Free of “dark cutting” characteristics.

2 CERTIFICATION

Carcasses to be examined for compliance with this specification shall be clearly identified and 

presented to an AMS grader for certification. Certification procedures for identification, the removal 

of preliminary identification marks (or other methods of control) from non-qualifying carcasses, and 

control of certified carcasses shall be in accordance with established Quality Assessment Division 

(QAD) procedures.

3 LABELING

Labeling of products derived from certified carcasses must follow Food Safety and Inspection Service

(FSIS) regulations 9 CFR part 317 and policy guidelines found at FSIS: Labeling/Label Approval 

website and FSIS: Claims Guidance website and QAD procedures including QAD 107: Requirements 

for Grading Terms on Meat Product Labeling.

1 Determined in accordance with the “Official United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef.” 2 Measured from a line formed by the extension of the top line (including the fat) and measuring the lean muscle (excluding the fat) 

perpendicular to that line in the center of the hump.
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-147 Specification

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 April 5, 2022

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 2 of 2

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

4 FEES

The costs of all grading and certification services performed by an AMS grader involving 

examinations, supervision, official documentation, and related services shall be borne by the person, 

group, or plant requesting the service.

___________________________________

Chad Nelson, National Meat Supervisor

Quality Assessment Division

Livestock & Poultry Program
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-12-0125

SAT Date: 1/10/2012

Print Date: 12/2/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 3 1

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1-3 1-3 3

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ;

P2Rec Comments:

Comment: No Comment

Keywords:

 Keywords: 

SOLV IRR

SOLV NEURO

PNEUMONIA

LIVER

KIDNEY

BLOOD

DEVEL

REPRO

IMMUNO

MUTA

ONCO
Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-12-0125

FATE: 

POTW removal (%) = 0-90 via sorption, stripping and biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk->mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = low - v.strong

PBT Potential: P1B1-P3B3 

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl - rapid

 Health:

 Health Summary: (Note: The PMN substance can range in structure from 

high molecular weight, to low molecular weight 

 Concerns reflect the worst case PMN 

constituents.) Absorption of the high molecular weight constituents is nil all routes, while 

absorption of the low molecualr weight is good all routes, based on physical/chemical 

properties and analogs. There are concerns for solvent irritation and solvent neurotoxicity, 

pneumonia, liver, kidney, and blood toxicities, developmental and reproductive 

toxicities, immunotoxicity, mutagenicity, and oncogenicity, based on 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for neutral organic chemicals; 

SAR chemical class = MW 483 (representative structure); 

pH7; effective concentrations 
based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as 

CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

*

SARs neutral organic chemicals

SAR Class

Ecotox Category Neutral Organics

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: J. Kwiat
## 2011 O&M Cost Summary

Strategy 2: White 

### BluffU1*U2 2.01b/MM8tu, RHR Strategy (Wet FGD>
inputAssumptions

Net Plant Capacity (MW> 1688 Capacity Factor 

### (projected 2015 value> 6655% Equivalent Availability Factor 90.00% Aux Power (MW) 39.20 Aux Power (MWh/year atfull load> 343392 Construction Duration (months> 36.0 Tie-In Outage Duration 

### (months) 1.5 Base Year 2011 In-Service Year 2015 Total Water Consumption (gpm> 2,522 Waste Ash Disposal (lb/hr( 111.946 Lime Rate (tons/br> 0.0 Limestone Rate (tons/br> 29:0 Bags 

### peryearreplaced Cages peryearreplaced
ACI Sorbent Rate (lb/hrl 1.000 

### Variable O&M Unit Prices (2011 

## $)

Aux Power, $/MWh $61.66 Lime, $/ton $113.40 Limestone, $/ton $23.88 Total WaterReguirement, s/lOUD gal $0.98 ACI Sorbent, $/lb $1.10 Bags, $/baq $114.44 Cages, $/cage $31.21 WasteAsh Disposal, 5/ton 

### $9.10 FixedO&M (2011 $Iyear)

OperatingLabor $1,513,000 Materials and Supplies $3,378,000 Maintenance Labor $5,067,000 Administrative

### Labor $169,000 Other
Total Fixed O&M $10,127,000 $/kW-year $6.00 Variable O&M (2011 

### 5/year>

Ass Power $13,639,000 Bags $0 Cages $0 ACI Sorbent $6,412,000 Lime $0 Limestone $4,038,000 Total Water Requirement $863,000 WasteAsh Disposal $2,971,000 Total

### Variable O&M $27,923,000 $/MWh $2.84 tOTAL FIXED AND VARIABLE O&t $3805000 

### Controlled Emissions

SO 2 Emissions (tons/year> 1,565 Hg Emissions (lb/year> 63
Shared Kitchen Insights

Things to Consider When Deciding to Use a Shared Kitchen

Additional shared facilities used by 

food entrepreneurs

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Retail

Office

Event space

Freezer

Refrigerator

Dry storage

4%

69%

6%

7%

44%

59%

Types of required trainings, licenses and certifications

Food handler 

food safety 

training

Liability 

insurance

Tax ID or 

business 

license

Kitchen 

rental 

application

County health 

department 

requirements

City level 

permits

HACCP 

plan

Acidified 

foods 

certification

179

survey

responses

84% of survey 

respondents 

completed 

all requirements within 

6 months.

Primary occupation?

>50%

of survey respondents stated the 

business operated in a shared 

kitchen is their primary occupation.

34%

of survey respondents stated the 

business operated in a shared 

kitchen is their secondary 

occupation.

Businesses invested 

an average of

36%

 of their earned revenue 

on rental fees.

Average reported profit =

$15K

Hours per month producing in shared kitchen

<10 hours

12%

10-20 hours

23%

20-40 hours

34%

40-80 hours

16%

80-120 hours

9%

>120 hours

6%

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, 

employer, and lender.

May 2023

of respondents spent 40 

69% hours or less per month 

producing in a shared 

kitchen.