alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 25 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 25

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
    limit the number of terms a Representative or Senator may serve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 10, 2019

  Mr. Byrne (for himself and Mr. Barr) submitted the following joint 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
    limit the number of terms a Representative or Senator may serve.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No person who has been a Senator for two terms shall 
again be eligible for election or appointment to the Senate.
    ``Section 2. No person who has been a Representative for six terms 
shall again be eligible for election to the House of Representatives.
    ``Section 3. For the purposes of this article, any term that began 
before the date of the ratification of this article shall not be 
included in determining the number of terms that a person has been a 
Senator or Representative.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 76 (Thursday, April 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23508-23509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9463]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-313, 314, 317, and 379 (Third Review)]


Brass Sheet and Strip From France, Germany, Italy, and Japan

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on 
brass sheet and strip from France, Germany, Italy, and Japan would be 
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an 
industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioner Daniel R. Pearson dissenting with respect to 
the antidumping duty order on France.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on March 1, 2011 (76 FR 
11509) and determined on June 6, 2011 that it would conduct full 
reviews (76 FR 35910, June 20, 2011). Notice of the scheduling of the 
Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in

[[Page 23509]]

connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the 
Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on 
September 12, 2011 (76 FR 58299). The hearing was held in Washington, 
DC, on January 31, 2012, and all persons who requested the opportunity 
were permitted to appear in person or by counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determination in these reviews to 
the Secretary of Commerce on April 13, 2012. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4313 (April 2012), 
entitled Brass Sheet and Strip from France, Germany, Italy, and Japan: 
Investigation Nos. 731-TA-313, 314, 317, and 379 (Third Review).

    By order of the Commission.
     Issued: April 13, 2012.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-9463 Filed 4-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Rosehurst Homeowners Association v. Hughes Natural Gas, Inc. and 

Real Provencher

Appellate case number: 01-14-00601-CV

Trial court case number: 980,933

Trial court: Co Civil Ct at Law No 2 of Harris County

Appellees Hughes Natural Gas, Inc. and Real Provencher filed an unopposed motion to 

reset oral argument in this cause. Oral argument was originally scheduled for April 28, 2015. 

We grant the Appellees’ unopposed motion to reset oral argument. Oral argument will be 

rescheduled and an amended submission notice will be sent to the parties. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 14, 2015
#### In the Matter of Edward Gerald Lackey, Bankrupt. Edward Gerald LACKEY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 75-2192.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued June 9, 1976.

Decided June 29, 1976.

*593Linwood L. Davis, Winston Salem, N. C. (Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Winston Salem, N. C., on brief), for appellant.

Francis J. Gould, Atty., Tax Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Norwood C. Tilley, Jr., U. S. Atty., Greensboro, N. C., Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gilbert E. Andrews, Karl Schmeidler, Attys., Tax Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., on brief), for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BUTZNER and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal by a bankrupt, Edward Lackey, from an order of the District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina which held that a debt owed by Lackey to the United States in the amount of $164,333 is a nondischargeable debt under section 17(a) of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C. § 35(a)(1).

> “Any person required to collect, truthfully account for, and pay over any tax imposed by this title who willfully fails to collect such tax, or truthfully account for and pay over such tax, or willfully attempts in any manner to evade or defeat any such tax or the payment thereof, shall, in addition to other penalties provided by law, be liable to a penalty equal to the total amount of the tax evaded, or not collected, or not accounted for and paid over.”

Lackey was President and Chief Executive Officer of American Truck Lines, Inc. and was responsible for the collection and remission of the income tax withholding and FICA taxes of employees of American. Beginning in 1969, American failed to pay these withheld taxes to the government during four successive quarters. The Internal Revenue Service thereafter made an assessment against Lackey, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6672.1

Lackey subsequently filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy. The United States timely filed a proof of claim with the Bankruptcy Court to recover the above mentioned claim. Lackey then began an adversary proceeding in the Bankruptcy Court to determine whether the debt in question was subject to discharge in bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy Court held that the claim was not dischargeable and the district court affirmed.

Upon careful consideration of the briefs, the record, and the oral argument, we conclude the court below was correct in holding the section 6672 debt was not dischargeable in bankruptcy. *In Re Murphy,*381 F.Supp. 813 (N.D.Ala.1974).

*AFFIRMED.*

1

. That section reads:
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT Jul y 18, 2006 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O RT H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 16593 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C. D o c k e tN o . 0 5 - 0 0 0 1 6 - CR- 4 - RH - W CS U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s C R A I G R U S S E L L , D e f e n d an t- A p p e llan t.

________________________ A pp ea lfr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe N orthe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( Ju ly 18, 2006) B efo re T JO F L A T , C A RN E S an dP R Y O R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E RC U R I A M: T hi s app ea lpres ent s one i ss ue: w hether s up ervi se d rel ea se st andardThe mandate in Nash issued on April 14, 2006. 1 2 c ondi t i on N o. 13 de l e ga t e s aj udi c i a lf unc t i on t o the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s pr oba t i on o f f ic e . W e r e s o lv e dth is is s u e in U n ite dS ta te s v . N a s h , 4 3 8 F .3 d1 3 0 2 , 1 3 0 6 ( 1 1 th C i r. 20 06 ). “ S t andard C on di t i on T hi rt ee n . . . do es no ti m prop er l y del egat e a

1 ju d ic ia l f u n c tio n to ap r o b a tio n o f f ic e r . . . .” I d . at 1 3 0 6 . AF F I R ME D.
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit (4)(l)

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                          FIFTH THIRD CAPITAL TRUST VI

         THIS Certificate of Trust of Fifth Third Capital Trust VI (the
"Trust"), dated December 17, 2001, is being duly executed and filed by
Wilmington Trust Company, a Delaware banking corporation, as trustee, to form a
business trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C. Section 3801 et
seq.).

         1. Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is Fifth Third
Capital Trust VI.

         2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of
the Trust in the State of Delaware is Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney Square
North, 1100 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001. Attn:
Corporate Trust Administration.

         3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective on
December 17, 2001.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the sole trustee of the
Trust, has executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first above
written.


                                         WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,
                                         as trustee


                                         By:  /s/ DONALD G. MACKELCAN
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Name:   Donald G. MacKelcan
                                              Title:  Vice President
# Sheet

United States Department of AgricultureAgricultural Marketing Service, Packers and Stockyards Division		Page &P of &N

*  These are mailing locations; please contact the business to verify physical address.  ** Firms with multiple plants may be listed only by headquarters location; if multiple DBAs are listed, bond amount shown is generally the firm total coverage.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
EXHIBIT 27 (A)

                       NONFINANCIAL STATEMENT DISCLOSURES
                                 REGULATION S-B

                                                                                
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the Company
10-QSB for the three  months  ended  August  31,  1996 and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                         1,000
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                        AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                                       13
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             5,850
<ALLOWANCES>                                                137
<INVENTORY>                                               2,579
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          8,482
<PP&E>                                                    9,364
<DEPRECIATION>                                            7,060
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           13,926
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     8,144
<BONDS>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                    969
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                               (2,091)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             13,926
<SALES>                                                   4,003
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          4,003
<CGS>                                                     2,758
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               933
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           (17)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             202
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         202
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                202
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               .06
        

</TABLE>
# C_2004094EN.01002202.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/22

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunale di Civitavecchia by order of that Court of 12 January 2004 in the case of Fallimento LIGABUE Gate Gourmet Roma s.p.a. against LSG Sky Chefs s.p.a.

(Case C-69/04)

(2004/C 94/47)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Tribunale di Civitavecchia (District Court, Civitavecchia) of 12 January 2004, received at the Court Registry on 16 February 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Fallimento LIGABUE Gate Gourmet Roma s.p.a. against LSG Sky Chefs s.p.a. on the following questions:

Does Article 18 of Council Directive 96/97/EC (1) of 15 October 1996, considered in conjunction with the principles of Community law, and in particular those of Article 49 (previously 59) of the Treaty, constitute an obstacle to the application of Article 14 of Legislative Decree No 18 of 13 January 1999, in so far as it imposes on providers of airport services the obligation to take on staff, thereby restricting their power of decision regarding entrepreneurial strategies concerning the choice, number and remuneration of employees?

1

---

(1)  OJ L 272 of 25.10.1996, p. 36.

1

---
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 8-K

                  CURRENT REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                      THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                         Date of Report: March 7, 1996

                        BOONTON ELECTRONICS CORPORATION

                            A New Jersey corporation
                         Commission File Number 0-2364
                 I.R.S. Employer Identification No. 22-1543137

           25 Eastmans Road, PO Box 465, Parsippany, N.J. 07054-0465
                                 (201) 386-9696

    ITEM 5.  OTHER EVENTS
             ------------

    On March 7, 1996, in accordance with the Subscription and Option Agreement,
dated February 23, 1996, by and between Boonton Electronics Corporation (BEC)
and G.E.M. USA, Inc. (GEM), BEC received, from GEM, Five Hundred and Sixty-Three
Thousand Four Hundred and Thirty-Seven Dollars and Fifty Cents ($563,437.50) for
the purchase of 180,300 treasury shares for Three Dollars and Twelve and
One-Half Cents ($3.125) per share.

    In return BEC provided GEM with a stock certificate for the 180,300 shares
of stock. As a result of the above noted actions, all of the documents executed
on February 23, 1996, pursuant to the Subscription and Option Agreement, became
effective on March 7, 1996.


    EXHIBITS: None
    --------

                                   SIGNATURE

    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
hereunto duly authorized.

                           BOONTON ELECTRONICS CORPORATION

                        By: /s/ John E. Titterton
                           -------------------------------
                                  John E. Titterton
                             Secretary/Treasurer and Vice
                                  President Finance

Dated: March 18, 1996

                                       39
Exhibit (32)(1)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Bonanza Gold, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert E. Kistler, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







[ex32002.gif]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1069 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1069

To prohibit the Department of Health and Human Services from operating 
    unlicensed temporary emergency shelters for unaccompanied alien 
                               children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2019

Ms. Judy Chu of California (for herself, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. McGovern, 
   and Mr. Castro of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Department of Health and Human Services from operating 
    unlicensed temporary emergency shelters for unaccompanied alien 
                               children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Shut Down Child Prison Camps Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINED TERM.

    In this Act, the term ``temporary emergency shelter'' means an 
unlicensed care provider facility that provides temporary emergency 
shelter and services for unaccompanied alien children when licensed 
facilities are near or at capacity.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION AGAINST TEMPORARY EMERGENCY SHELTERS.

    The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall not maintain or 
operate (directly or through a contract) any temporary emergency 
shelter, including the temporary emergency shelter previously 
operational in Tornillo, Texas, and the temporary emergency shelter in 
Homestead, Florida.
                                 <all>
```
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1144 

To prohibit the use of funds during a lapse in appropriations to support 

congressional delegations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2019 

Mr. GALLAGHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of funds during a lapse in appropriations 

to support congressional delegations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No CODELs During 

5 Shutdowns Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION. 

7 (a) PROHIBITION.—An executive agency may not ex8 pend any funds for the purpose of supporting official trav9 el undertaken by more than one Member of Congress durVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:42 Feb 21, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1144.IH H1144

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1144 IH

1 ing any period in which there is a lapse in appropriations 

2 for any instrumentality of the Federal Government. 

3 (b) EXCEPTION.—An executive agency may expend 

4 funds for the purpose described under subsection (a) if 

5 the President, in consultation with the Speaker of the 

6 House of Representatives and the Majority leader of the 

7 Senate, waives the prohibition under such subsection for 

8 such purpose. 

9 (c) EXECUTIVE AGENCY DEFINED.—The term ‘‘exec10 utive agency’’ has the meaning given that term in section 

11 133 of title 41, United States Code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2  Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    The undersigned hereby certifies, in my capacity as an officer of NSTAR Electric Company, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:(i)the enclosed Annual Report of NSTAR Electric Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(ii)the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NSTAR Electric Company.  Dated: February 15, 2008By:_/s/ JAMES J. JUDGE_____James J. JudgeSenior Vice President,Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Ralph O. Douglas v. Government Employees Insurance Company, Unity National Bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Acquirer of Certain Assets and Liabilities of Washington Mutual Bank, The Honorable Randy Roll, Dick Deguerin, and The Texas Court of Criminal Ap peals

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 2

- 00 129

- CV

Trial court case number: 2010

- 53065

Trial court: 12 5 th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Ralph O. Douglas , has moved to recall the mandate

. We dismiss the motion for lack of jurisdiction

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 18.7, 19.3

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

Justice Jane Bland, A cting for the Court

Date: September 19, 2013

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale.