alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

          
   <S><C>                            <C>
   <ARTICLE>                         5
   <MULTIPLIER>                      1,000
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                     YEAR
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Dec-31-1998
   <PERIOD-START>                    Jan-01-1998
   <PERIOD-END>                      Dec-31-1998
   <CASH>                            524
   <SECURITIES>                      0
   <RECEIVABLES>                     951
   <ALLOWANCES>                      (134)
   <INVENTORY>                       177
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                  1911
   <PP&E>                            5183
   <DEPRECIATION>                    (552)
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                    9050
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             2287
   <BONDS>                           2842
   <COMMON>                          3057
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0
   <PREFERRED>                       0
   <OTHER-SE>                        812
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      9050
   <SALES>                           10004
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                  10009
   <CGS>                             11905
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                     14590
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                  0
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                  0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                (187)
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                   (4778)
   <INCOME-TAX>                      0
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>               (2477)
   <DISCONTINUED>                    (2301)
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
   <CHANGES>                         0
   <NET-INCOME>                      (4778)
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                     (.16)
   <EPS-DILUTED>                     (.16)
           
   
</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32**

** **

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONSOF CEO AND CFO**

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies that theannual report on Form 10-K of Bemis Company, Inc. for the year ended December 31,2008 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Bemis Company, Inc.

 
| /s/  Henry J. Theisen                                    |   | /s/  Gene C. Wulf                                              |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Henry J. Thiesen, President and  Chief Executive Officer |   | Gene C. Wulf, Senior Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer |
| February 27, 2009                                   |   | February 27, 2009                                         |

 

53

----
#### Lamb et al. *v.*City of Erie et al., Appellants.

*Municipalities*— Cities *of the third class*— Act *of June 21, 1918, Art. VII, Paragraph 18, P. L. 568*— Certificate *of superintendent of finance*— N *ecessity.*

A construction contract entered into by a city of the third class is not valid unless it has the certificate of the superintendent of finance as required by Article VII, paragraph 13, of the Act of June 27, 1913, P. L. 568; and a city of the third class which has entered into a contract lacking such certificate is properly enjoined from making payments thereunder.

Argued September 30, 1918.

Appeal, No. 75, Jan. T., 1919, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Erie Co., Feb. T., 1918, No. 4' awarding an injunction in case of T. A. Lamb, D. A. Sawdey, A. W. Hayes, E. P. Selden, George D. Selden, and C. E. Bacon, taxpayers of the City of Erie, for themselves and all other taxpayers of the City of Erie who desire to join with them in these proceedings, v. The City of Erie, Miles B. Kitts, Mayor; C. L. Baker, Superintendent of Accounts and Finance; W. D. Kinney, J; Emil Gross and Henry Kessler, Councilmen of the City of Erie; Theodore Eichhorn, Francis T. Nagorski and Thomas Mehaffey, Councilmen-elect of the City of Erie, and George E. Cantrell, Inc.

Before Brown, C. J., Stewart, Frazer, Walling, Simpson and Fox, JJ.

Affirmed

Bill in equity for an injunction. Before Rossiter, P. J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts:

The court on final hearing enjoined defendants from making payments under the contract referred to in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Defendants appealed.

*Errors assigned*were in dismissing exceptions to various findings of fact and conclusions of law and the decree of the court.

*392October 23, 1918:

*8. L. Gilson,*with him *M. G. Cornell,*for appellants.

*Charles H. English,*with him *Chas. A. Mertens*and *John B. BrooJcs,*for appellees.

Pee Curiam,

Before the contract between the City of Erie and Metz and Roth for the construction of the Mill Creek conduit could take effect as a contract, it was necessary to have on it the certificate of the superintendent of finance, as required by Article VII, paragraph 13, of the Act of June 27,1913, P. L. 568, and, as it bore no such certificate, it did not “take effect”: City of Erie v. Moody, 176 Pa. 478. As nothing could be lawfully done under it, its invalidity continued when the city entered into the agreement with George E. Cantrell, Inc., to complete it. The enjoining decree of the court below could not have been withheld, and it is now affirmed at the costs of the appellants.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1170

ALI ASGHAR, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A79-489-431) Submitted: September 19, 2005 Decided: October 7, 2005 Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anser Ahmad, AHMAD LAW OFFICES, P.C., Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, for Petitioner. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Jean B. Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).PER CURIAM: Ali Asghar, a native and citizen of Pakistan, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Asghar’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b) (2005). We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 31.1








I, Susan B. Sheffield, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2023-3  (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Citibank, N.A.








By:/s/ Susan B. SheffieldName:Susan B. SheffieldTitle:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:March 4, 2024
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of Public Availability of FY 2011 Service Contract Inventories.

# SUMMARY:

                        In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), the Small Business Administration is publishing this notice to advise the public of the availability of the FY 2011 Service Contract inventory. This inventory provides information on service, contract actions over $25,000 that were made in FY 2011. The information is organized by function to show how contracted resources are distributed throughout the agency. The inventory has been developed in accordance with guidance issued on November 5, 2010 by the Office of Management and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). OFPP's guidance is available at                         *http://www.whitehouse.gov/​sites/​default/​files/​omb/​procurement/​memo/​service-contract-inventories-guidance-11052010.pdf.*                         The Small Business Administration has posted its inventory and a summary of the inventory on the Small Business Administration homepage at the following link:                         *http://www.sba.gov/​content/​service-contract-inventory.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Questions regarding the service contract inventory should be directed to William Cody in the Procurement Division at (303) 844-3499 or                         *William.Cody@sba.gov.*

Dared: March 7, 2012.

Jonathan I. Carver,

Chief Financial Officer/Associate Administrator for Performance Management, Office of the Chief Financial Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-8997 Filed 4-16-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE M
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MSGI Security Solutions, Inc. (the
"Company")as amended on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Richard J. Mitchell III, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 28, 2005
                                       By: /s/ Richard J. Mitchell III
                                          -----------------------------
                                          Richard J. Mitchell III
                                          Chief Accounting Officer
                                          (Principal Financial Officer)

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


                                       94
#### Joseph P. Day Realty Corp., Respondent, v Mayflower Agency Co., Inc., Appellant.

—Order and judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Burton S. Sherman, J.), respectively entered August 17, 1990 and September 12, 1990, granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in the sum of $55,250 plus interest, costs and disbursements and severing defendant’s counterclaim, unanimously reversed, on the law, the judgment vacated and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment denied, with costs and disbursements.

In this action to recover a real estate broker’s commission, questions of fact are presented as to whether plaintiff through its vice president Arida violated its fiduciary obligation to its client, defendant-lessor, by substituting without the approval of defendant’s general counsel certain terms in the subject lease less favorable to defendant and more favorable to the lessee bank with whom the vice president allegedly had an ongoing business relationship. Such a breach, if proven, would result in the forfeiture of any right of compensation *(John J. Reynolds, Inc. v Snow,*11 AD2d 653, *affd*9 NY2d 785). *303Regarding the fact that the corporate brokerage license failed to mention Mr. Arida, who was individually licensed as a broker, we find such lack of compliance with Real Property Law § 441-b (2) not a bar to any possible recovery and distinguishable from the situation in *Brener & Lewis v Fawcett Publs.*(197 Misc 207, *affd*276 App Div 994, *lv denied*276 App Div 1081), where the addition of a person with a salesman’s license to a corporate brokerage license was expressly prohibited by the statute. The purpose of sanctions for lack of compliance with relevant licensing laws is to protect the public, " 'not to permit others to take advantage of the violation of the statute to escape their obligations’ ”. *(Gal-breath-Ruffin Corp. v 40th & 3rd Corp.,*19 NY2d 354, 362-363, quoting Pound, J., in *Bendell v De Dominicis,*251 NY 305, 310.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Wallach and Kupferman, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

JOSEPH NISSIM MARTEL AND ESTER 

MARTEL, HUSBAND AND WIFE, ON 

BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL 

OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,

Petitioners

v.

ALLEGHENY COUNTY, CITY OF 

PITTSBURGH, PITTSBURGH PUBLIC 

SCHOOLS, AND ALLEGHENY COUNTY 

BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS AND 

REVIEW,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 280 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of January, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
391 A.2d 675

#### Commonwealth v. Herman Brown, Appellant.

Submitted March 13, 1978.

Marilyn C. Zilli, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Marion E. MacIntyre, Second Assistant District Attorney, and LeRoy S. Zimmerman, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

*588OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The only issue raised on this appeal is whether the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict. We are informed by the lower court that “[t]he single matter pursued by defendant at argument on his post-trial motions” was ineffectiveness of counsel. Therefore, the sufficiency issue has been waived. *Commonwealth v. Williams,*476 Pa. 557, 383 A.2d 503 (1978).

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Silberstein Ungar, PLLCCPAs and Business Advisors


Phone (248) 203-0080


Fax (248) 281-0940


30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175


Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586


www.sucpas.com





April 12, 2010
 
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 Board of Directors
 Galaxy Gaming, Inc.
 Las Vegas, Nevada
 
 To Whom It May Concern:
 
 Silberstein Ungar, PLLC hereby consents to the use in the Form 10-K,Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, filed by Galaxy Gaming, Inc. of our report dated April 3, 2010, relating to the financial statements of Galaxy Gaming, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, as of and for the periods ending December 31, 2009 and 2008.
 
 Sincerely,
 
 /s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC
 Silberstein Ungar, PLLC
 
 Bingham Farms, Michigan
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bar Association Members/State Street Collective
Trust (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Beth M. Halberstadt, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Beth M. Halberstadt Beth M.
Halberstadt Chief Financial Officer November 9,
2006
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 12 (Thursday, January 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-974]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9619-3]


Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities Advisory Committee; Charter 
Renewal

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Charter for the Environmental Protection Agency's Farm, Ranch, 
and Rural Communities Advisory Committee (FRRCC) will be renewed for an 
additional two-year period, as a necessary committee which is in the 
public interest, in accordance with the provisions of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App.2. The purpose of the FRRCC 
is to provide advice to the Administrator of EPA on environmental 
issues and policies that are of importance to agriculture and rural 
communities. It is determined that the FRRCC is in the public interest 
in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the Agency by 
law. Inquiries may be directed to Alicia Kaiser, U.S. EPA, (mail code 
1101-A), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, telephone 
(202) 564-7273, or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#80ebe1e9f3e5f2aee1ece9e3e9e1c0e5f0e1aee7eff6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="81eae0e8f2e4f3afe0ede8e2e8e0c1e4f1e0afe6eef7">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 4, 2012.
Lawrence Elworth,
Agricultural Counselor to the Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012-974 Filed 1-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Opinion issued April 14, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas

NO. 01-15-00201-CR

NO. 01-15-00202-CR

NO. 01-15-00203-CR

NO. 01-15-00204-CR

NO. 01-15-00205-CR

____________

CODY CRYMES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 253rd District Court

Chambers County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 17161, 17162, 17163, 17164 and 17165

MEMORANDUM OPINION
2

Counsel for appellant, Cody Crymes, has filed a motion to dismiss these 

appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Crymes has signed the motion to dismiss. 

We have not issued a decision in the appeals.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). We 

dismiss any pending motions as moot.

We direct the Clerk to issue the mandate within 10 days of the date of this 

opinion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
II 

Calendar No. 171 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1138 

[Report No. 116–69] 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AUGUST 16, 2019 

Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of August 1, 2019, by 

Ms. MURKOWSKI, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the West Valley demonstration project, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WEST VALLEY DEMONSTRATION PROJECT. 

4 (a) REAUTHORIZATION.—Section 3(a) of the West 

5 Valley Demonstration Project Act (Public Law 96–368; 

6 42 U.S.C. 2021a note) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘$5,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1138 RS

1 1981’’ and inserting ‘‘$75,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

2 2020 through 2026’’. 

3 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after the 

4 date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 

5 shall submit to Congress a report that describes— 

6 (1) the volumes, origins, and types of radio7 active waste at the Western New York Service Cen8 ter in West Valley, New York; 

9 (2) what options have been identified for dis10 posal of each such type of radioactive waste; 

11 (3) what is known about the costs of, and time12 frames for, each such option; 

13 (4) the benefits and challenges of each such op14 tion, according to the State of New York and the 

15 Department of Energy; and 

16 (5) as of the date of enactment of this Act— 

17 (A) how much has been spent on the dis18 posal of radioactive waste associated with the 

19 demonstration project prescribed by section 

20 2(a) of the West Valley Demonstration Project 

21 Act; and 

22 (B) what volumes and types of radioactive 

23 waste have been disposed of from the Western 

24 New York Service Center. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 171 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1138 

[Report No. 116–69] 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the West Valley demonstration 

project, and for other purposes. 

AUGUST 16, 2019 

Reported without amendment 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS