alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 24
  POWER OF
    ATTORNEY
  Bowne & Co., Inc. and each person whose signature
    appears below hereby authorize both David J. Shea and Scott L.
    Spitzer, each with full power to act alone, to file in either
    paper or electronic form an annual report on
    Form 10-K
    and any and all amendments thereto, under the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, for the fiscal year ended
    December 31, 2006, which report and amendments shall
    contain such information and exhibits as the said David J. Shea
    or Scott L. Spitzer deems appropriate. Bowne & Co.,
    Inc. and each such person signing below hereby further appoint
    both David J. Shea and Scott L. Spitzer as
    attorneys-in-fact,
    each with full power to act alone, to execute such report and
    any and all amendments thereto in the name and on behalf of
    Bowne & Co., Inc. as well as in the name and on behalf
    of each such person, individually and in each capacity stated
    below, thereby granting to said
    attorneys-in-fact
    and each of them full power and authority to do and perform each
    and every act and thing whatsoever that any of them may deem
    necessary or advisable in order to carry out fully the intent of
    the foregoing as the undersigned might or could do personally or
    in their capacities aforesaid.
  Bowne & Co., Inc.
  By:
    /s/  David
    J. Shea    Chairman of the Board, President and
 Chief Executive Officer
    Signature

Title

Date/s/  David
    J. Shea(David
    J. Shea)

Chairman of the Board, President
    and
    Chief Executive Officer

March 14, 2007/s/  John
    J. Walker(John
    J. Walker)

Senior Vice President and
    Chief Financial Officer
    (Principal Financial Officer)

March 14, 2007/s/  Richard
    Bambach, Jr.(Richard
    Bambach, Jr.)

Vice President and Corporate
    Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

March 14, 2007/s/  Carl
    J. Crosetto(Carl
    J. Crosetto)

Director

March 14, 2007/s/  Douglas
    B. Fox(Douglas
    B. Fox)

Director

March 14, 2007/s/  Marcia
    Hooper(Marcia
    Hooper)

Director

March 14, 2007/s/  Philip
    E. Kucera(Philip
    E. Kucera)

Director

March 14, 2007




---



##### 



Signature

Title

Date/s/  Stephen
    V. Murphy(Stephen
    V. Murphy)

Director

March 14, 2007/s/  Gloria
    M. Portela(Gloria
    M. Portela)

Director

March 14, 2007/s/  H.
    Marshall
    Schwarz(H.
    Marshall Schwarz)

Director

March 14, 2007/s/  Wendell
    M. Smith(Wendell
    M. Smith)

Director

March 14, 2007/s/  Lisa
    A. Stanley(Lisa
    A. Stanley)

Director

March 14, 2007/s/  Vincent
    Tese(Vincent
    Tese)

Director

March 14, 2007/s/  Richard
    R. West(Richard
    R. West)

Director

March 14, 2007/s/  David
    J. Shea(David
    J. Shea)

ATTORNEY IN FACT

March 14, 2007
# GTR Wheat Table 

# GTR Wheat Table Redesign

# 321

# 0314

# 0307

# 0229

# 0222

# 0215

# 0208

# 0201

# 0125

# 0118

# 0111

# 0104

# 1228

# 1221

# 1214

# 1207

# 1130

# 1123

# 1116

# 1109

# 1102

# GTR Wheat Table Redesign new MY

# 1026

# 1019

# 1012

# 1005

# 0928

# 0914

# 0907

# 0831

# 0824

# 0817

# 0810

# 0803

# 0727

# 0720

# 0713

# 0706

# 0629

# 0622

# 0615

# 0608

# 0601

# 0525

# 0518

# 0511

# 0504

# 0427

# 0420

# 0413

# 0406

# 0330

# 0323

# 0316

# 0309

# 0302

# 0223

# 0216

# 0209

# 0202

# 0126

# 0119

# 0112

# 0105

# 1229

# 1222

# 1215

# 1208

# 1201

# 1124

# 1117

# 1110

# 1103

# 1027

# 1020

# 1013

# 1006

# 0929

# 0922

# 0915

# 0908

# 0901

# 0825

# 0811

# 0804

# 0728

# 0721

# 0714

# 0707

# 0630

# 0623

# 0616

# 0609

# 0602

# 0526

# 0519

# 0512

# 0505

# 0428

# 0421

# 0414

# 0407

# 0331

# 0324

# 0317

# 0310

# 0303

# 0224

# 0217

# 0210

# 0203

# 0127

# 0120

# 0113

# 0106

# 1230

# 1223

# 1216

# 1209

# 1202

# 1125

# 1118

# 1111

# 1104

# 1028

# 1021

# 1014

# 1007

# 0930

# 0923

# 0916

# 0909

# 0902

# 0826

# 0819

# 0812

# 0805

# 0729

# 0722

# 0715

# 0708

# 0701

# 0624

# 0617

# 0610

# 0603

# 0527

# 0520

# 0513

# 0506

# 0429

# 0422

# 0415

# 0408

# 0401

# 0325

# 0318

# 0311

# 0304

# 0225

# 0218

# 0211

# 0204

# 0128

# 0121

# 0114

# 0107

# 1231

# 1224

# 1217

# 1210

# 1203

# 1126

# 1119

# 1112

# 1105

# 1029

# 1022

# 1015

# 1008

# 1001

# 0924

# 0917

# 0910

# 0903

# 0827

# 0820

# 0813

# 0806

# 0730

# 0723

# 0716

# 0709

# 0702

# 0625

# 0618

# 0611

# 0604

# 0528

# 0521

# 0514

# 0507

# 0430

# 0423

# 0416

# 0409

# 0402

# 0326

# 0319

# 0312

# 0305

# 0227

# 0220

# 0213

# 0206

# 0130

# 0123

# 0116

# 0109

# 0102

# 1226

# 1219

# 1212

# 1205

# 1128

# 1121

# 1114

# 1107

# 1031

# 1024

# 1017

# 1010

# 1003

# 0926

# 0921

# TOTAL

# Mexico

# Phil

# Japan

# China

# Korea

# Nigeria

# Taiwan

# Thailand

# Colombia

# Indonesia

# Italy

# Egypt

# Brazil

# Peru

# Venezuela

# Iraq

# Data

# Top Ranking-Procedures

file://///stmdc4007cl/tsd/New%20GTR%202/Website%20Zip%20Folderfile://///stmdc4007cl/tsd/New%20GTR%202/Website%20Zip%20Folder/New%20Table15_wheatWeb.xlsxhttp://apps.fas.usda.gov/export-sales/myrk_rpt.htm

# Rankings 2022-23

# Top Rankings

# Ranking 2021-22

# Ranking 2020-21

# Rank 2019-20

# Rank 2018-19

# Rank 2017-18

# Rank-2016-17

# Rank-2015-16

# 2012-13 weekly pace

2012-13 Wheat Exports Sales and Shipments vs. 3-yr Average
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ELIAS GARCIA-ALMONTE, a.k.a. Elias

Almonte Garica,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-10372

D.C. No. 4:13-cr-01955-JGZ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 7, 2015** 

Before: FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Elias Garcia-Almonte appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for reentry after

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

FILED

APR 10 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
U.S. 738 (1967), Garcia-Almonte’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are

no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We

have provided Garcia-Almonte the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. 

No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. 

Garcia-Almonte waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our

independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80

(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United

States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss

the appeal. See id. at 988. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED. 

2 14-10372
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 116 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 116

  To amend the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 to increase the 
amount that certain banks and savings associations may invest in small 
     business investment companies, subject to the approval of the 
      appropriate Federal banking agency, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

Ms. Judy Chu of California (for herself and Mr. Norman) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 to increase the 
amount that certain banks and savings associations may invest in small 
     business investment companies, subject to the approval of the 
      appropriate Federal banking agency, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Investing in Main Street Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. INVESTMENT IN SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

    Section 302(b) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 
U.S.C. 682(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting before the period the 
        following: ``or, subject to the approval of the appropriate 
        Federal banking agency, 15 percent of such capital and 
        surplus'';
            (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting before the period the 
        following: ``or, subject to the approval of the appropriate 
        Federal banking agency, 15 percent of such capital and 
        surplus''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Appropriate federal banking agency defined.--For 
        purposes of this subsection, the term `appropriate Federal 
        banking agency' has the meaning given that term under section 3 
        of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

                                                                      EXHIBIT 18

December 9, 2004

Finlay Enterprises, Inc.
529 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY

Dear Sirs/Madams:

At your request, we have read the description included in your Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended
October 30, 2004, of the facts relating to Finlay Enterprises, Inc.'s (the
"Company") change in its method of determining price indices used in the
valuation of LIFO inventories from external indices published by the Bureau of
Labor Statistics to an internally generated index in 2004. We believe, on the
basis of the facts so set forth and other information furnished to us by
appropriate officials of the Company, that the accounting change described in
your Form 10-Q is an alternative accounting principle that is preferable under
the circumstances.

We have not audited any consolidated financial statements of the Company and
subsidiaries as of any date or for any period subsequent to January 31, 2004.
Therefore, we are unable to express, and we do not express, an opinion on the
facts set forth in the above-mentioned Form 10-Q, on the related information
furnished to us by officials of the Company, or on the financial position,
results of operations, or cash flows of the Company and subsidiaries as of any
date or for any period subsequent to January 31, 2004.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New York, New York
```
|                            |                                                                                                                                  |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|                            |                                                                                                                                                      |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                         |        |                         |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                    |   |                    |
| /s/ Craig O. Morrison   |   | /s/ William H. Carter   |
| Craig O. Morrison       |   | William H. Carter       |
| Chief Executive Officer |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |   |                    |
| February 28, 2011  |   | February 28, 2011  |
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Wayne W. Mills, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on form 10-K for the year ended December31, 2003 of Entrx Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: March 24, 2004 /s/ Wayne W. Mills  By: Wayne W. Mills President and Chief Executive Officer
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

**FAA -**  **20 13**  **- 0146**  Docket Number
**20 13**  **- SW**  **- 060**  **- AD**  Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket Agusta Bollet tino Tecnico No. 109EP - 30, Revision C, Dated September 29, 2006 .


### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF :**  9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
EXHIBIT 32.1GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC.CERTIFICATIONIn connection with the periodic report of Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), I, Kirk E. Sanford, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of thedate hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,that to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated.        Dated: August 14, 2006 By:  /s/ Kirk E. Sanford    Kirk E. Sanford    Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Bullion Monarch Mining, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K/A-2 for the period ending April 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, R. Don Morris, President and Philip Manning, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Date:June 22, 2010By:/s/R. Don MorrisR. Don MorrisPresident and DirectorDate:June 22, 2010By:/s/Philip ManningPhilip ManningChief Financial Officer
|   | (1) | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended      October 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      January 28, 2010 |   |
|------------------------------|--------|

|   | /s/   RAYMOND      F. LANCY       |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|   | Raymond      F. Lancy                            |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer, Vice President     |
|   | Treasurer      and Assistant Secretary           |
|   | (Principal      Financial and AccountingOfficer) |
<PAGE>   1







                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


     As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of our report included in this Form 10-K, into Tom Brown, Inc.'s
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 Nos. 33-42991, 33-44225,
33-60191, 33-60842, 33-13157, 33-30069, 33-42011, 333-56577, 333-69353,
333-31426, 333-89031 and 333-89033.



                                                             RYDER SCOTT COMPANY

March xx, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of American Bar Association Members/Northern Trust Collective Trust (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Thomas R. Benzmiller, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Thomas R. BenzmillerThomas R. BenzmillerPrincipal Executive OfficerAugust 15, 2011
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7364** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. CHARLIE LOUIS JONES , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. James C. Dever III , Chief District Judge. ( 5:11

- cr - 00095

- D

- 1; 5:12

- cv - 00649

- D )

Submitted : November 21 , 2013 Decided: November 26, 2013

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Charlie Louis Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Charli e Louis Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2013 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 0 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstr ating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have indepe ndently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately pres ented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 79 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2020 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights 

amendment. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That notwithstanding any time limit contained in House 

4 Joint Resolution 208, 92d Congress, as agreed to in the 

5 Senate on March 22, 1972, the article of amendment 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HJ 79 RFS 

1 proposed to the States in that joint resolution shall be 

2 valid to all intents and purposes as part of the United 

3 States Constitution whenever ratified by the legislatures 

4 of three-fourths of the several States. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 13, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 

By ROBERT F. REEVES, 

Deputy Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS