alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Gurpreet Singh Sangha, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date:  January 17, 2006 | /s/
Gurpreet Singh Sangha
Gurpreet Singh Sangha
Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 88 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.88

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twenty

                            Joint Resolution

 
Providing for the appointment of Franklin D. Raines as a citizen regent 
         of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of John W. McCarter Jr. of 
Illinois on March 21, 2020, is filled by the appointment of Franklin D. 
Raines of Washington, DC. The appointment is for a term of six years, 
beginning the date of the enactment of this joint resolution.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 53 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 29, 2019 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall for an event to 

commemorate the 400th anniversary of the arrival of 

the first African slaves to the territory that would become the United States. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT COM4 MEMORATING 400TH ANNIVERSARY OF AR5 RIVAL OF FIRST AFRICAN SLAVES. 

6 Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is 

7 authorized to be used on September 9, 2019, for an event 


jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 53 RDS 

1 to commemorate the 400th anniversary of the arrival of 

2 the first African slaves to the territory that would become 

3 the United States. Physical preparations for the ceremony 

4 shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as 

5 the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


jspears on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE: MARINDA PALACIOS,

 

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-16-00220-CR

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 7 

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2016DCV2587)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no reversible 

error in the judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall 

be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-26-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-26-1996
<CASH>                                           1,287,110
<SECURITIES>                                       577,837
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,775,658
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,986,065
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,183,195
<PP&E>                                           8,581,935
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,153,170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,719,852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,533,867
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                        933,080
<COMMON>                                         1,261,001
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,245,471
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,719,852
<SALES>                                         18,128,274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,128,274
<CGS>                                           11,996,305
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,131,969
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (84,002)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6,018
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,390,935
<INCOME-TAX>                                       506,629
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                884,306
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       884,306
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.05
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 111 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 111

  To amend section 416 of title 39, United States Code, to remove the 
  authority of the United States Postal Service to issue semipostals 
 except as provided for by an Act of Congress, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

 Mr. Burgess introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend section 416 of title 39, United States Code, to remove the 
  authority of the United States Postal Service to issue semipostals 
 except as provided for by an Act of Congress, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Semipostal Stamp Clarification Act 
of 2019''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE SEMIPOSTAL STAMP 
              AUTHORITY.

    Section 416 of title 39, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Limited Authority.--The Postal Service may issue and sell 
semipostals under this section only for such purposes or causes as 
provided for by an Act of Congress.'';
            (2) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)--
                            (i) by striking ``appropriate agency or 
                        agencies'' and inserting ``appropriate agency 
                        or entity, as provided for by an Act of 
                        Congress pursuant to subsection (b),''; and
                            (ii) by striking ``such agency'' and 
                        inserting ``such agency or entity'';
                    (B) by striking paragraph (2); and
                    (C) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph 
                (2);
            (3) by striking subsection (e); and
            (4) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections 
        (e) and (f), respectively.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         471,419
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,480,174
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (68,990)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,917,134
<PP&E>                                      35,902,605
<DEPRECIATION>                              (3,051,414)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,447,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,234,477
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        277
<COMMON>                                       123,819
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,230,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,447,677
<SALES>                                      7,270,252
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,073,117
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,481,114
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,250,484
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             5,050,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,061,017
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,088,473)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,992,547
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             (1,432,973)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,805,899)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.33)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      James
      B. Frakes, Chief Financial Officer of Left Behind Games Inc. (the “Company”),
      have reviewed the Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the period ending
      March 31, 2007 (the “Report”). For purposes of Section 1350 of Title
      18, United States Code, I certify that to the best of my knowledge: .




a.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                andb.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      James B. Frakes


James
      B.
      Frakes, Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)





Dated
      July 16, 2007
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 13, 2015

No. 04-15-00118-CV

Shirlely ADAMS, Charlene Burgess, Willia Mae Herbst Jasik, William Albert Jasik, and R. May 

Oil & Gas Company, Ltd.,

Appellants

v.

Murphy Exploration & Production 

MURPHY EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION CO.-USA, A Delaware Corporation,

Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-05-0466-CVA

Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received 

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellant’s brief 

is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to Wednesday, May 13, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Mary A. Keeney

PO Box 98

Austin, TX 78767-0098

Jason Allen Newman

910 Louisiana St

Houston, TX 77002-4916

John B. McFarland

PO Box 98

Austin, TX 78767-0098

Jason Allen Newman

910 Louisiana St

Houston, TX 77002-4916

Macey Reasoner Stokes

One Shell Plaza

Houston, TX 77002-4995

Bill Kroger

910 Louisiana Street, Suite 3000

Houston, TX 77002-4995
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-2527

___________________________

Jaibrianne Lacey; Mary F. Lacey

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.

Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: April 1, 2015

Filed: April 8, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

BYE, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Jaibrianne Lacey and her mother, Mary F. Lacey, appeal the district court’s1

order affirming the denial of Jaibrianne’s application for child’s disability benefits,

and also the denial of supplemental security income, as Jaibrianne turned 18 during

administrative proceedings. Upon de novo review, see Bernard v. Colvin, 774 F.3d

482, 486 (8th Cir. 2014), we are satisfied that the Commissioner’s decision is

supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. The judgment of the

district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Matt Jeffrey Whitworth, United States Magistrate Judge for

1

the Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition

by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-
#### Jack Kelley, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error.

(Supreme Court of Florida, *En Banc,*

October 15, 1907).

Writ of Error to Circuit Court, Holmes county; J. Emmet Wolfe, Judge.

No appearance for plaintiff in error;

W. H. Ellis, Attorney General, for the state,

This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error. There was judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant takes writ of error. Dismissed on motion of counsel for the defendant in error.
850.968
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harry J. Ballard, Jr., Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the inventory search of his vehicle was pretextual and unlawful. Upon impounding a vehicle, the police may conduct an inventory search of it and of any containers found therein *(see, People v Gonzalez,*62 NY2d 386, 388-390; *see also, People v Townsend,*152 AD2d 515, *appeal dismissed*76 NY2d 746; *South Dakota v Opperman,*428 US 364; *cf., People v Lloyd,*
      *1026167 AD2d 856). When such search is challenged, the People have the burden of showing that it was "conducted pursuant to standardized procedures” *(People v Lloyd, supra,*at 857; *see, Florida v Wells,*495 US 1, 109 L Ed 2d 1; *Colorado v Bertine,*479 US 367, 374, n 6; *Illinois v Lafayette,*462 US 640, 643-644, 648; *South Dakota v Opperman, supra,*at 374-375). The People established at the suppression hearing that the challenged search was conducted consistently with the police department’s standardized guidelines, which directed that, prior to towing, officers are to inspect all accessible areas of the vehicle and remove any loose articles of value. The suppression court properly determined that the search was within permissible limits.

Moreover, the record fully supports the determination of the suppression court that the police officers acted lawfully when they stopped and arrested defendant *(cf., People v Howell,*49 NY2d 778; *People v Carvajales,*152 AD2d 675, *lv denied*75 NY2d 768; *People v Mikel,*152 AD2d 603).

We have examined the other contentions raised by defendant and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Wisner, J.—Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 1st Degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Lowery, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Terrence Adams, Appellant.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenberg, J.), rendered April 19, 1989 convicting him of burglary in the first degree (two counts) and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the court’s *Sandoval*ruling did not constitute an improvident exercise of discretion, nor did it deprive the defendant of a fair trial. After considering the probative value of the defendant’s eight prior arrests and five theft-related convictions, as well as the prejudicial effect of this evidence, the court ruled that should the defendant testify, he could be cross-examined concerning only two prior convictions, including the underlying facts.

It is well settled that the exclusion of cross-examination concerning prior convictions is a matter largely within the discretion of the trial court *(see, People v Sandoval,*34 NY2d *627371; *People v Mackey,*49 NY2d 274). In this case, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion *(see, People v Branch,*155 AD2d 475; *People v Torres,*110 AD2d 794). Moreover, that the prior crimes, which were both theft-related, may be similar to the crime charged herein did not compel their exclusion *(see, People v Torres, supra).*The commission of crimes involving dishonesty are highly relevant to a defendant’s credibility *(see, People v Sandoval, supra).*Further, that the defendant may specialize in one area of criminal activity will not automatically shield him from cross-examination as to those prior convictions *(see, People v Rahman,*46 NY2d 882; *People v Monahan,*114 AD2d 380).

Finally, in light of the defendant’s extensive criminal history, the sentence imposed was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Kunzeman, J. P., Kooper, Sullivan and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
-*k, L. /&?•>/& / G&j/tl-Cft

•nmnena

FILED IN

14th COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

APR 08 2015

3% •/&£? ^<JMy^^/¥^6 fid//*/J/Jp/M&tifaoPH&K A. PRINE

CLERK

s(//tf7^7ldaTJa*//$*_•. J^J^a/sjPA/j)A/JAJjzf

x

SaJ Aj$~>-Qj9S£. Jjl/js ^n Mj£ fi£ts£)A/dJM/rts: &a/

/dcfr- JDjlJJI/ J?£/2 MjE V£M/Jf J//AA&* JLjjld

fc/j/*/)*/£* /M) j/bfr Mr A// 4/A is. im

RECEIVED IN

OUBTOFCRIMINALAPPEAL

APR 13 2015

AfeelAeosta,Clerk
7U£ /^t^Ha/^A jUX93' Oda^jo/j^/is///£ 4/i&>

/0*x/:2i/G/-e£jJJJ Jj/SM^D/2/^ £D/JAjfr77£M?

M Muz £//i&x£: MjPjaJJu&k*# Oa/j^M). l*5,/3tfj 5S//£J J7#fc'jD/7B2& fa/teat/

$JZA/JJJ/M/aJ ^JVfj// M?< 7%h£ />£/?/?/)dj&2.

•A//>J&/jt&f JJD a^^Z^^^^?^^^^^:

Iju/jQ^Mj^ JZT^/C/jJQ//^^-/o/CiA* J%t £/&£

>ljJMJ j#//j£#/jE&'£// te/vfa/Mls•*/, 2jDJ3.

H2Z. *

T7J£ />j££5£j// d£*c///Jife fm A/jj/S&£AttEiJ

/Qj2 £$/fJ?jB£jJ?£A/Agj/ j0£)6j&u) //Dj2ft/<5)£)4k$ 4S

/)S/ J& ±3/5 >Tmz Ah/jWdj/^£ Ajzs j\B/

IjZft^jtrf/jZr/ £M]/ £Mza/ijDA/ /W/tOj2 /d

jJAj^M/jOI j />£-/fiirf)Ate£ /fo)& ifysj HjDjVA/j, 3mjM>. Mjjs maMM/Aj/J jEk/^d/A

P/JM A /JAB //f£'/fe/rfrAJ'/OjB OjsCjS^/)j]/m]/

j£j&/jiai) jrf £js£A/g /4»/f-l)6//*3^Q£ JjO

jp£fjh2)jJ&L* Aod 3&

7J?s#/jL

jjjjMjjj/je;, y^T-77^4/2

T£>c J Mi, j j^v^u-js
Gj&dAejfi/k. £>/ *Jt£v/^0££

M£ MBit'MM'/®te?3/kfa £j&s//W/d&£M/JBDjL-

/7^},n;o/2JzZf2)A/j9j0y j$£l//£dD tDjiZ Afo//l?c/ /& '

J>.£t £&)> J±4d£^

#/A57M?TAtr~ yg'///

£j2aj2Dj2aa? CntAA/yy Z)zg^/>^fe^K

AAA £\ jLeaz/S/ $/. yM V<D2/Jj

A?a/J/a£/a)A/ y lfi~~~~7'1/6'y£

\J,jf iJLS. JC/&S& D/jss;/fib//- -.

x, yteteyj&£jd#Mf/i) &u/a0T< /y<&'tt& j J^^AAh

£/a/j7 z£ lL)AJ?fj£A2 C/y/AA)A -/ 7^ykj£jy M/Pt/^JL

~ft£Alj9/4y £)/ /j£a4£A&y* 3ffifoJk£/jfj^y&fe

d&£&s/&c/ /DjD^66/s ^^ .J^Jid (/), y/7/r

/^£gYAjsjo YjPjPja) Jj/fc

//?£ 3£
14th COURT OF APPUUS

1 301 FANNIN, ROOM 245

HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002

f£ Ajpy /UjlJlfajtfAA/

•/JiAAJh\Jj//£. L/jJsT'

J AS /zyA SSA&Zj/

MdAJlJ-fa/?//£,j 7f

•Wf£

OFFICIAL tjysirocoo

pe^MlWfor

pmvM€%i§

m w?$ 

•m1 i

Court ofCriminal Appeals Supreme Court

Building 201W. 14th Street, Room 106

Austin, Texas 78701

7d :'Ol l^msui ..iiMiHH'i'l'}'HI''lMl''l'll'lli'iM

tiim'SiBF«?i

/tojM&ZAfa .&u

-."-.t.T^.t^'-.'tS.gl :*"*-; •>lillill'lni'l'ii!Mll".iMi',Mil»
HECEIVED FROM.

DATE. No.

Ofor rent

Ofor

.DOLLARS

ACCOUNT

PAYMENT

BAL DUE

iCASH

OCHECK

f~\MONEY

Bord

FROM. TO

CARD
Exhibit 10.7
 Partner Agent
Assignment and Assumption Agreement




---



##### 



SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS ALLIANCE, INC.
 By:
    /s/ Daniel A. CacchioneName:
    Daniel A. CacchioneTitle:
    Senior Vice President, Chief Underwriting Officer RISK TRANSFER HOLDINGS, INC.
 By:
    /s/ Paul R. HughesName:
    Paul R. HughesTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer Risk Transfer Programs, LLC
 By:
    /s/ Paul R. HughesName:
    Paul R. HughesTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer