alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Charles WIKSTROM, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

No. 4535.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

Dec. 7, 1979.

David C. Backstrom, Deputy Public Defender, Fairbanks, Brian Shortell, Public Defender, Anchorage, for appellant.

Randy Olsen, Asst. Dist. Atty., Harry L. Davis, Dist. Atty., Fairbanks, Avrum M. Gross, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellee.

Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., and CON-NOR, BOOCHEVER, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ.

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

Charles Wikstrom, appellant, pled *nolo contendere*to three counts contained in an *909indictment charging violations of AS 11.15.-120.1 The superior court imposed a fifteen year term of imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently.2 In this appeal Wikstrom contends that.the court imposed an excessive sentence.3

In the early morning hours of July 2, 1978, Wikstrom, a man in his early thirties, picked up an eighteen year old female hitchhiker. He transported her to the vicinity of her home, then requested that she continue to ride with him as he was alone and wanted. company. When she agreed, Wikstrom drove to a remote location where he forced the young woman to submit to vaginal and anal intercourse, and to perform an act of fellatio. Wikstrom also choked the victim with his hands and, at one point, inserted some sort of metal device into her vagina.4 Eventually the victim was able to summon aid and Wikstrom was arrested.

Our review of the record fails to convince us that the superior court was clearly mistaken in imposing the sanction that it did. Accordingly, its sentence is AFFIRMED. *McClain v. State,*519 P.2d 811 (Alaska 1974).

1

.AS 11.15.120 provides:

> *Rape,*(a) A person who (1) has carnal knowledge of another person, forcibly and against the will of the other person, or (2) being 16 years of age or older, carnally knows and abuses a person under 16 years of age, is guilty of rape.

> (b) A person who assists another to force or compel a third person to engage in a sexual act without consent is considered an accomplice to rape, irrespective of the legal status of that person with respect to the person forced or compelled to engage in a sexual act against his will.

> (c) For purposes of this section, the terms “carnal knowledge” and “sexual act” include sexual, oral and anal intercourse, with some penetration, however slight.

2

. On each count, Wikstrom was “punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary for not more than 20 years nor less than one year.” AS 11.15.130(c).

3

. AS 12.55.120(a) provides in part: “A sentence of imprisonment lawfully imposed by the superior court for a term or for aggregate terms exceeding one year may be appealed to the supreme court by the defendant on the ground that the sentence is excessive.” *See also*Rule 21, Alaska R.App.P.

4

. Shortly after the incident, the victim was examined by a physician who confirmed the fact that she had recently had intercourse and that there was some internal damage to her vagina.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CB Richard Ellis Realty Trust (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jack A. Cuneo, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1 The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

December 7, 2006
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32-3

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Lexington Precision Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K, as amended by Form 10-K/A,
for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chief
Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the
undersigned's knowledge:

      (1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

      (2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                       /s/  Dennis J. Welhouse
                                       -----------------------------------
                                        Dennis J. Welhouse
                                        Senior Vice President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
                                        (Principal Financial Officer)
                                        April 5, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification will not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference.
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 12 - 00 506 - CR

TRINA BISHOP APPELLANT
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------ FROM THE 211 TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

------------ 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------ Appellant Trina Bishop appeals her conviction for state

- jail felony theft
upon the revocation of her deferred adjudication community supervision. Bishop’s court
- appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. 386

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Bishop had the opportunity to file a pro se brief but did not do so; the State has not filed a brief. Once an appellant’s court

- appointed attorney files a motion to wit hdraw on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders , this court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record. See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State , 904 S.W.2d 920, 922

– 23 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 82

– 83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).
We hav e carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief

. We agree with

co unsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State , 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

BOB MCCOY JUSTICE
PANEL: MCCOY , GARDNER , and WALKER , J J

. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: June 20, 2013
CALIFORNIA DESERT GRAPE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE

ROSTER

Marketing Order No. 925 39-205 leopard street

Term Ending December 31, 2024 Suite D and E

Palm Desert, CA 92211

MANAGER: CHAIRPERSON:

Loorie Cooper Robert O. Bianco

Phone: (760) 342-4385 Phone: (760) 391-5488 

Fax: (760) 342-0485 Fax: (760) 391-5489

admin@californiadesertgrapes.com sindylee@anthonyvinelands.com

MEMBERS ALTERNATES

Producers

Nicholas L. Bozick Michael Bozick

Mecca, CA Mecca, CA 

 

Robert O. Bianco Anthony Bianco

Coachella, CA Coachella, CA 

Robert Carian Jack Campbell

Bermuda Dunes, CA Delano, CA 

Gordon Chuchian Howard Chuchian

Coachella, CA Coachella, CA 

Vacant Vacant

Handlers

George J. Tudor Doreen C. Tudor

Mecca, CA Mecca, CA 

Jose L. Gomez Rojas Vacant

Thermal, CA 

Blaine Carian Anthony (Tony) Bianco 

Coachella, CA Coachella, CA 

Vacant Vacant

Vacant Vacant
Member-at-Large 

John Powell Edward Lopez

Coachella, CA Coachella, CA 

Public

Ellen Way Becky Broughton

La Quinta, CA Mecca, CA
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO.03-02-00304-CV

William O. Harrison, Appellant

v.

State of Texas; City of Corpus Christi, Texas; Transit Authority of Corpus Christi, Texas; 

and Special Purpose District of Corpus Christi Crime Control, Texas, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GV100146, HONORABLE FRANK J. MALONEY, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant William O. Harrison filed an unopposed motion to dismiss his appeal, informing 

this Court that the parties have executed a settlement agreement and requesting that this Court dismiss his 

appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2).

 

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, Patterson and Puryear

Dismissed on Appellant=s Motion

Filed: August 8, 2002

Do Not Publish
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
   In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Chubasco
Resources Corp., for the quarter ended January 31, 2005, I, Scott Young,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:
  (1)
    the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Chubasco Resources Corp. for the
      quarter ended January 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    the
      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
      quarter ended January 31, 2005, fairly presents in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Chubasco Resources
      Corp.
  By:                
/s/ Scott
Young
 
 Name:            Scott
Young
 
 Title:             
Principal and Chief Executive and
 Financial Officer, President,
 and Director
 
 Date:             
March 16, 2005
FREDERICK, PERALES,

ALLMON & ROCKWELL, P.C.

707 Rio Grande, Suite 200 

Austin, TX 78701 

(512) 469-6000 Phone 

(512) 482-9346 Fax 

April 14, 2015 

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk of the Third Court of Appeals via e-file 

Price Daniel, Sr. Building, Room 101 

209 W. 14th Street 

Austin, Texas 78701 

 

Re: Court of Appeals No. 03-14-00257-CV; Maverick County, et. al., v. 

Railroad Commission of Texas, et. al.. 

Dear Mr. Kyle: 

 In response to your letter dated March 24, 2015, please know that I intend to 

argue the above-referenced case before the Court on May 20, 2015 at 9:00 AM, on 

behalf of Appellant Maverick County. Please feel free to contact me if you have 

any questions. 

 

Sincerely, 

 

 /s/ David Frederick 

David Frederick 

Frederick, Perales, 

Allmon & Rockwell, P.C. 

707 Rio Grande, Ste. 200 

Austin, Texas 78701 

(512) 469-6000 

(512) 482-9346 (facsimile) 

dof@lf-lawfirm.com 

 

ACCEPTED

03-14-00257-CV

4873387

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/14/2015 8:31:59 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/14/2015 8:31:59 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 By my signature below, I certify that on this 14th day of April, 2015, a copy 

of the foregoing document was served upon the parties identified below via 

electronic service. 

 

 /s/ David Frederick 

David Frederick 

FOR APPELLEES DOS 

REPUBLICAS COAL 

PARTNERSHIP, CAMINO REAL 

FUELS, LLC, AND NORTH 

AMERICAN COAL COMPANY: 

Bill Cobb 

Chesley N. Blevins 

Jackson Walker LLP 

100 Congress Ave., Ste. 1100 

Austin, TX 78701 

Telephone (512) 236-2326 

Facsimile (512) 691-4446 

bcobb@jw.com 

cblevins@jw.com

FOR APPELLEE RAILROAD 

COMMISSION OF TEXAS: 

Cynthia Woelk 

Nancy E. Olinger 

Office of the Attorney General 

P.O. Box 12548 

Austin, TX 78711-2548 

Telephone (512) 453-2012 

Facsimile (512) 457-4613 

cynthia.woelk@texasattorneygeneral.gov 

nancy.olinger@texasattorneygeneral.gov 

FOR APPELLANT CITY OF 

EAGLE PASS: 

Heriberto Morales Jr. 

Stephen J. Ahl

Langely & Banack, Inc. 

401 Quarry St. 

Eagle Pass, TX 78852 

Telephone (830) 773-6700 

Facsimile (830) 757-4045

hmorales@langleybanack.com 

sahl@langleybanack.com 

FOR APPELLANT MAVERICK 

COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT: 

Celeste Lira 

Brin & Brin 

6223 IH-10 West 

San Antonio, TX 78201 

Telephone (210) 341-9711 

Facsimile (210) 341-1854 

clira@brinandbrin.com 
3

FOR APPELLANTS MAVERICK 

COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL AND 

PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION 

AND GEORGE BAXTER: 

Javier Riojas 

Texas RioGrande Legal Aid, Inc. 

542 E. Main 

P.O. Box 2001 

Eagle Pass, TX 78853 

Telephone (830) 752-6400 

Facsimile (830) 773-5806 

jriojas@trla.org 

Enrique Valdivia 

Texas RioGrande Legal Aid, Inc. 

1111 N. Main Avenue 

San Antonio, TX 78212 

Telephone (210) 212-3700 

Facsimile (210) 212-3772 

evaldivia@trla.org 

Thomas M. Weber 

Paul R. Tough 

McElroy, Sullivan, Miller, Weber & 

Olmstead, LLP 

P.O. Box 12127 

Austin, TX 78711 

Telephone (512) 327-8111 

Facsimile (512) 327-6566 

tweber@msmtx.com 

ptough@msmtx.com
International Affairs Division

Topics to be Discussed

 International Trade Issues

 International Outreach

 Complaints
International Trade Issues

 China Issues

 Decree 177

 U.S. Exporter list consists of exporters, export facilities, and 

companies under 15k metric-ton exemptions who ship to China

 FGIS submitted latest exporter list on 6/9

 Importers require company name and address on APHIS 

phytosanitary certificate to match names and addresses on 

China’s posted list.

o FGIS will work with FAS and APHIS to address issue 
International Trade Issues

 Japan Phytosanitary Certification

 Requirement for Phytosanitary certificates 

 Effective August 2023

 APHIS’ “Compliance Based Certification Pilot Program”

 Honduran Weight Shortages

 USDA Cooperators reported weight shortages increasing year-by-year

 Shortages at destination

 Working with Foreign Agricultural Service to address issue
International Outreach

 Foreign Agricultural Service Seminars (FAS)

 FGIS Educational Series – Semi-Monthly Seminars

 FAS Mid-Career Professionals Advancing Careers Together 

(MPAC) 

 U.S. Grains Council Seminars Given:

 Honduras – on FGIS Weighing Process - May

 Japan – on US Corn Quality – July

 U.S. Wheat Associates Lab Training – Santiago – August 
International Outreach

 PowerPoint Presentations & Grain Grading Mats Translated into:

 Arabic

 Chinese

 Korean

 Japanese

 Spanish

 New French Translations for:

 Corn, Sorghum, Soybeans, Wheat Grading Mats

 Overview of FGIS Presentation

 Destination Grain Sampling Presentation

 Containerized Grain Presentation
Foreign Complaints Received

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

146,354

318,923

212,363 200,984

19,637

163,838 144,209

FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 Yearly Total

9 5 4 9 2 7 6

FY 22 *

To date 

No. Complaints

Metric Tons Involved

Fiscal Year 2016 to Fiscal Year 2022 to date 
Foreign Complaints Received

1 Short Weight Complaint

 Italy

5 Quality Complaints

Malaysia 

Korea

China
QUESTIONS?
Exhibit 32.1  Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    In connection with the Annual Report of NSTAR Electric Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas J. May, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:(i)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: February 14, 2011By:/s/   Thomas J. MayThomas J. MayChairman, President andChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.3


 


 


 





 


 


STEWDOMER INVESTOR AWARENESS


AGREEMENT


 


 


This Agreement Is entered into effective as of 1st, July, 2022
Between SINCERITY APPLIED MATERIALS HOLDINGS CORP. (hereinafter “The Company”) and JOHN J STEWART (hereinafter “Consultant”)


 


The Consultant has engaged as a Private Investment Finder,
Investor Relations Professional, and has operated as a Financial Communications Principal for the last five decades.


 


The Consultant will aim to increase investors awareness
for the Company via including but not limited to the following program:


 


		·	Telephone Communications
		·	Social Media
		·	Email Distribution
		·	Other forms of remote correspondence
		·	meetings with personnel and other Consultants at times and locations to be mutually agreed upon



 


Consultant represents and warrants
that at the time of execution of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement are not inconsistent with any other contractual or legal
obligations Consultant may have or with the policies of any institution or company with which the Consultant is associated.


 


Compensation: In consideration
for Consultant’s services hereunder, The Company shall pay/compensate Consultant as follows:


 


		1.	USD 58,000 one of initial payment within 14 days after effective date of this contract
		2.	$4,000 ~ $15,000 USD monthly depends on the actual hours allocated to the company’s work, which
will be invoiced monthly,



 


 


 






    	 	1	 



     


    

 





At the Company's option, the agreement
between the Company and the Consultant will continue on a quarterly basis after the initial quarterly term subject to the mutual agreement
between the parties regarding the compensation that the Company shall pay to the Consultant.


 


Payment to be made in advance to
the Consultant’s account provided. Any income taxes levied on payments to be made to Consultant hereunder shall be exclusively borne
by Consultant.


 


This Agreement shall be effective
upon the date set forth in the first paragraph and may be terminated by either party at anytime with written notice of termination.


 


Finders disclaimer


 


JOHN J STEWART is not a Registered Broker Dealer and he
does not represent himself nor conduct himself as a Broker Dealer in any transaction. JOHN J STEWART does not offer investment advice
and any Funding brought to companies is funding from Accredited Investors, as per SEC Rule 501. JOHN J STEWART is acting as a Finder for
the transaction for introductory purposes only.


 


YIWEN ZHANG (President)





_____________________________


 


JOHN J STEWART (Consultant)


 


stewdomer@gmail.com


LinkedIn
Twitter Stocktwits


1-818-231-9765 Cell


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 






    	 	2
#### In the Matter of Gary Bell, Petitioner, v Ralph Sherman et al., Respondents.

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR arti*739ele 78 to prohibit the respondents from proceeding further against the petitioner on Queens County Indictment Number QN12163/88.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

A juror who has not heard all of the evidence in a case is grossly unqualified to render a verdict and must, therefore, be discharged *(see, People v Russell,*112 AD2d 451, 452). Where, as here, the discharge of the juror makes it impossible to continue with the trial, principles of double jeopardy will not act to bar a retrial (CPL 270.35, 280.10). Further, we note that a defendant cannot consent to a trial by fewer than 12 jurors *(see, Matter of Stressler v Hynes,*169 AD2d 750; NY Const, art I, § 2; art VI, § 18; *Cancemi v People,*18 NY 128; *People v Lester,*149 AD2d 975). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DECEMBER 31,
1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO FORM
10-K.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,310,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,341,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   150,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,273,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,993,000
<PP&E>                                      40,745,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,805,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,669,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,618,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,396,000
<COMMON>                                     4,415,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,450,000
<SALES>                                     51,956,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            51,956,000
<CGS>                                       43,840,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               43,840,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             435,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,169,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,169,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                 134,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,303,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47


</TABLE>