alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 9, 2015

No. 04-15-00192-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.R. AND J.D.,

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013PA02092

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On April 1, 2015, appellant filed a notice of appeal in this court, seeking to appeal from a 

trial court order terminating her parental rights. Appellant is advised that a notice of appeal with 

regard to this same termination order was previously filed on her behalf by appointed counsel 

and was assigned appellate number 04-14-00608-CV. The matter was briefed by the parties and 

submitted to the court on the briefs. On February 4, 2015, this court rendered an opinion and 

judgment affirming the trial court’s order of termination. A copy of the opinion and judgment is 

attached to this order. Thus, this second notice of appeal filed by appellant is duplicative. It is 

therefore ORDERED that appeal number 04-15-00192-CV, the duplicative appeal, will be 

treated as a closed case for administrative purposes. 

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order and its attachments on 

appellant and all counsel. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Merit Systems Protection Board

# AGENCY:

Merit Systems Protection Board.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) is terminating the following Systems of Records: MSPB/Internal 5, “Workload and Assignment Tracking System;” MSPB/Internal 7, “Administrative Data System;” and MSPB/Central 1, “Assignment and Correspondence Tracking System.” They are no longer in use.

# DATES:

Effective April 6, 2012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Darryl Aaron, Director of Information Services, Office of the Clerk of the Board, 1615 M Street NW., Washington, DC 20419; (202) 254-4474;                         *Darryl.Aaron@mspb.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, this notice formally terminates the following systems of records: MSPB/Internal 5, “Workload and Assignment Tracking System;” MSPB/Internal 7, “Administrative Data System;” and MSPB/Central 1, “Assignment and Correspondence Tracking System.”

William Spencer,

Clerk of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2012-9530 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7400-01-P
391 A.2d 691

#### Commonwealth v. Mathis, Appellant.

Submitted March 14, 1977.

William H. Kaye, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; William C. Cram-er, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9262]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL


Service Contract Inventory for Fiscal Year (FY) 2011

AGENCY: Office of Special Counsel.

ACTION: Notice of availability--FY 2011 Service Contract Inventory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Through this notice, the Special Counsel announces the 
availability of the Office of Special Counsel's service contract 
inventory on its Web site, at http://www.osc.gov/RR_OSCReportsAndInformation.htm. A service contract inventory is a tool 
for assisting an agency in better understanding how contracted services 
are being used to support mission and operations and whether the 
contractors' skills are being utilized in an appropriate manner.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Kammann, Director of Finance, at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e48f8f858989858a8aa48b9787ca838b92"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="660d0d070b0b0708082609150548010910">[email protected]</span></a>; 1730 M Street NW., Suite 218, Washington, DC 20036-
4505, or by facsimile at (202) 254-3711.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010, Public Law 111-117, requires 
civilian agencies, other than the Department of Defense, that are 
required to submit an inventory in accordance with the Federal 
Activities Inventory Reform Act of 1998 (Pub. L. 105-270, 31 U.S.C. 501 
note) to submit their inventories to the Office of Federal Procurement 
Policy (OFPP) in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) by December 
30, 2011. In addition, section 743 requires these agencies, which 
include the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, to (1) make the inventory 
available to the public by posting the inventory on its agency 
homepage, (2) provide OFPP with the Web site address (URL) on which the 
inventory is being posted so that the inventory can be linked to a 
central OMB Web page, and (3) publish in the Federal Register a notice 
announcing that the inventory is available to the public along with the 
name, telephone number, and email address of an agency point of 
contact. Through this notice, the Office of Special Counsel announces 
the availability of its inventory on the following Web site: http://www.osc.gov/RR_OSCReportsAndInformation.htm. The point of contact for 
the inventory is provided under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section in this notice.

    Dated: April 12, 2012.
Carolyn N. Lerner,
Special Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012-9262 Filed 4-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7405-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Mark Schuman et al., Respondents, v Raymond Corporation, Appellant.

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: It is well settled that, absent demonstration of a meritorious cause of action and justifiable excuse for the failure to file a note of issue within the 90-day period, it is an *1041abuse of discretion to deny a CPLR 3216 motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution *(see, Cox v Edmister,*122 AD2d 557, *appeal dismissed*68 NY2d 900; *MacLeod v Nolte,*106 AD2d 860). Absent a showing that defendant deliberately denied or obstructed discovery, plaintiffs’ delay in obtaining discovery does not constitute a justifiable excuse for the failure to file a note of issue within the 90-day period or the failure to move for an extension of time *(see, Papadopoulas v R.B. Supply Corp.,*152 AD2d 552, 553; *Mason v Simmons,*139 AD2d 880, 881; *CIC Intl. v Swiss Bank Corp.,*121 AD2d 219, 220-221). The suggestion by plaintiffs’ attorney of record in Buffalo that he thought that a Pennsylvania attorney would file the note of issue is not persuasive. The Pennsylvania attorney had no communication with defendant or its attorney during the pendency of this action for more than six years and did not participate in the belated discovery efforts.

Plaintiffs, in order to demonstrate the existence of a meritorious cause of action, were obliged to submit materials in the same evidentiary form as on a motion for summary judgment *(see, Walker v Town of Lockport,*109 AD2d 1102, *affd*65 NY2d 840; *MacLeod v Nolte,*106 AD2d 860, *supra; Jones v First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn.,*101 AD2d 1005). Plaintiffs submitted an engineer’s affidavit which opined that a crossbar on the forklift plaintiff was operating when injured was negligently designed, but plaintiffs failed to submit any proof showing how the accident occurred or that the crossbar was involved in the accident. Absent evidence that the crossbar was a contributing cause of the accident, plaintiffs failed to demonstrate the existence of a meritorious cause of action *(see, Hass v Town of Orangetown,*163 AD2d 726, *lv dismissed 77*NY2d 893). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County, Sprague, J.—Dismiss Complaint.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
<PAGE>
 

                                                                    Exhibit 18.1



January 20, 1999

Boston Gas Company 
One Beacon Street
Boston, MA 02110



Re: Form 10-K Report for the Year Ended December 31, 1998

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K calling for a 
letter from a registrant's independent public accountants whenever there has 
been a change in accounting principle or practice.

During the fourth quarter of 1998, the Company changed its method of accounting 
for unbilled revenues, retroactively applied as of January 1, 1998, from 
recording revenue when billed to its customers based on its monthly meter 
reading schedule to estimating and accruing the amounts of revenues associated 
with service provided after billing through the end of the accounting period. 
According to management of the Company, this change was made to better match 
revenues with service provided to customers and to be consistent with the 
prevalent method in the utility industry.

We are of the opinion that the Company's change in method of accounting is to an
acceptable alternative method of accounting, which, based upon the reasons
stated for the change and our discussions with you, is also preferable under the
circumstances in this particular case. In arriving at this opinion, we have
relied on the business judgment and business planning of your management.


Very truly yours,



Arthur Andersen LLP
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel; Genetics of Heart, Lung and Blood Diseases Review.                    

*Date:*                         February 8, 2012.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Michael P. Reilly, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7200, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-9659,                         *reillymp@nhlbi.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 12, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-955 Filed 1-18-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT—FINANCE





PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





The undersigned, David W. Kalish, does hereby certify to his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 of the registrant:





(1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)   The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.








Date: May 15, 2020/s/ David W. KalishDavid W. KalishSenior Vice President-Finance










---
1400 Independence Avenue, SW.

Room 2635-S

Washington, DC 20250-0201

Application for Service – Export of Processed Egg and Egg Foods

Export application for service of processed eggs and/or egg foods that are regulated by the FDA intended for human consumption.

Consignor/Exporter (name and address): Producer/Manufacturer (name and address)

Point of Contact:

Contact email:

Fax number:

Phone number:

Point of Contact:

Name of Products: Country of destination: ISO code:

Phone number:

Fax number:

Contact email:

 I (we) agree to:

1. To notify the Program Manager, in writing and in advance of my (our) cancellation of the application;

2. To notify the Program Manager immediately when a change occurs in my (our) legal status /Applicant Representative; and;

3. That the service for which application is hereby made may be denied or withdrawn at any time as provided in the Certification Regulations.

Signature of Applicant or Representative: Date:

Print or type Name and Title of Applicant or Representative:

Tax I.D. #:
c/y^y^^^.^^^i^zfc /g99662.A^*^^ *ii6z*A.

~0

s\JsLeun^Z0{ ^ /UL^D jC^cav .

J^Ul^T^^l^. Q77 ^Z7^^ fiudcdc&r? i

~W

t»'^S?'®',«w

M

liffi
.^^^(^^Z^^?^-^ «f

&Uia£, /fa M/-552&-0)

V-/0-7-0IS

jd^££edL^o^-JY&

-J^Luza^-c^j/,-^^^ <£&sy

'i£.

-sd*^.6JJL£L-^U-ZZ?l<

ZSSS?.&&> _/-Aj2~ i<i^CyC/n^2Jl^ .4£JA® /!/^2<V /2^7^Q<

^O-toCf—l

_^2*£^£>5£^^ .

t&t&J-teste -<0>7-

XAa^^-7^-^a^£^^^azdj&/ ^^^£^^^^^^<^^^^gL.^g^^£^4;^£^_ 7W

V-

—JUa 'cn^^Lo

A**** LL/WM&£~
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 19
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 19
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 19
 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 14 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 15 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 16 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 17 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 18 of 19
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 19 of 19
. . . . 

-...:... 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

V 
Hoaorablo P. 0. Booth, d&it vetozaaMlm# ?sgo 2 

Aa vo 0oMtnJm uururter, no aou labo~to 

or8uppltes ia lnuiyway & . P ror al qul~t lt LZ~í 

been noved to a aov 1oooti.m. 
.-- 

Boaorable f. 0. Booth, Chle? Votodnarlaa, pIsa 3 

. 

.Youra vary tnlly 

ATTORSEY - OFlxxAs
##### 



FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT
   Sale and
Purchase of Securities; Closing
  Miscellaneous
 (o)
    
    Approval. The Purchaser acknowledges that (i) the Company has not
sought, or received, stockholder approval as may be required under the rules and
regulations of the NASD or Nasdaq National Market in respect of transactions that may
result in, among other things, a change of control or the issuance of more than 20% of
a companys outstanding common stock, (ii) all of the Companys representations and
warranties contained herein are deemed modified by the disclosures in this Section
9(m), (iii) the restrictions on the issuance of Shares set forth in the last sentence
of Section 1(c) are intended to ensure that the Company does not violate any rules,
regulations or listing requirements of the NASD or the Nasdaq National




---



##### 



Market, and (iv) if the Company ever needs to seek shareholder approval with respect
to such matters, the Purchaser shall not be entitled to vote on such matters.
  SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS ALLIANCE, INC.By: 
Name:
    
    /s/ William S. Loder

William S. LoderTitle:
    
    Chief Underwriting OfficerRISK TRANSFER HOLDINGS, INC.By: 
Name:
    
    /s/ Paul R. Hughes

Paul R. HughesTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer
Livestock Mandatory 

Reporting

Compliance Program
LMR Compliance Structure

LMR Compliance Program Manager

LMR Compliance Program Coordinator

5 LMR Compliance Auditors

Conduct Approximately 200 Audits Per Year
Audits

• Every plant is audited two times per fiscal year.

• Audit schedule is set up every six months.

• In a six month period auditors review:

- 38 cattle plants totaling 640 records

- 42 boxed beef plants totaling 200 records

- 43 swine plants totaling 670 records

- 49 pork plants totaling 265 records

- 6 sheep plants totaling 56 records

- 14 lamb plants totaling 130 records
Audits (cont’d)

• A full day audit is also conducted at least once 

per fiscal year.

• During the audit, plants are required to provide 

documentation to the auditors.

• Documentation includes, but is not limited to: buy 

sheets, grading or settlement sheets, scale 

tickets, kill line-ups, sales invoices, copies of 

checks, etc.
Audits (cont’d)

• The auditors review the documentation.

• The auditors are verifying the plant’s 

documentation and submissions to AMS.

• When the audit is complete the auditor writes up 

an official compliance report.
Audit Timeline

• Auditor contacts plant to set up audit schedule.

• Auditor contacts reporters. 

• Auditor notifies plant 10 days prior for Lot ID’s/records 

that will be reviewed.

• Auditor conducts audit and the audit report is sent to 

reporters within 10 business days.

• LPGMN reporters have 5 business days to contact the 

plant.
Audit Timeline (cont’d)

• Plant has 10 business days to respond.

• Plants state corrective actions.

• Reporters send a response back to auditing.

• Auditors then have 10 business days to verify corrective 

action with the plant.
LMR Compliance Program Review

• Livestock, Poultry, and Seed Program recently took 

steps to conduct an internal review of the LMR 

Compliance Program.

• Review was conducted by the Chief of the Audit 

Services Branch which is under the Quality 

Assessment Division (QAD).

• Based on this review there will be several things 

changing.
Auditing Changes

1. Auditors will have full control of the audit and report 

from start to finish;

2. Multiple procedures will be updated and revised, 

including more comprehensive training;

3. Amend current sampling procedures;

4. Moving to a Performance Based Auditing program;

5. Provide more transparency regarding auditing 

procedures.
Contact information

Brittany Koop

LMR Compliance Program Manager

USDA - AMS - Livestock, Poultry, & Grain Market News

816-676-7000

Brittany.Koop@ams.usda.gov

Visit us online at:

https://www.marketnews.usda.gov/mnp/ls-home
**Exhibit
      32.1**









**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of MSGI Security Solutions, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
      Jeremy Barbera, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Interim
      Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:October
                13, 2006By:
              /s/ J.
                Jeremy
                BarberaChairman
                  of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
                    Executive Officer)




This
      certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
      by
      such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required
      by
      Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.