alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Updated June 17, 2010

Formal Recommendation by the 

National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) 

to the National Organic Program (NOP)

Date: April 29, 2011

Subject: Enzymes Sunset

Chair: Tracy Miedema

 

 

The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: 

Rulemaking Action X

Guidance Statement

Other

Statement of the Recommendation (Including Recount of Vote): 

To relist: 

Enzymes, must be derived from edible, nontoxic plants, nonpathogenic fungi, 

or nonpathogenic bacteria.

on § 205.605(a) of the National List.

 

Rationale Supporting Recommendation (including consistency with 

OFPA and NOP): 

No new information concerning Enzymes, with annotation, was discovered 

since the last re-listing of this group of materials, and no public comment was 

received opposing relisting.

NOSB Vote:

Moved: Steve DeMuri Second: Katrina Heinze

Yes: 13 No: 1 Abstain: 0 Absent: 0 Recusal: 0
National Organic Standards Board 

Handling Committee 

Proposed Sunset 2012 Recommendation 

Enzymes 

 April 29, 2011 

List: 205.605 Nonagricultural (nonorganic) substances allowed as ingredients in or on 

processed products labeled as “organic” or “made with organic (specified ingredients 

or food group(s)).” 

(a) Nonsynthetics allowed 

Committee Summary: 

Federal register notice of the sunset of these materials elicited no public comments against relisting. 

Review of the original recommendation, historical documents, and public comments does not 

reveal unacceptable risks to the environment, human, or animal health as a result of the use or 

manufacture of this material. There is no new information contradicting the original 

recommendation which was the basis for the previous NOSB decision to list this material. 

Committee Recommendation(s)

The handling committee recommends the renewal of the following substance in this use 

category as published in the final rule: 

Enzymes 

Committee Vote 

Motion: To relist enzymes on § 205.605(a). 

Motion by: Steve DeMuri Second: Mac Stone 

Yes: 5 No: 0 Absent: 2 Abstain: 0 Recuse: 0
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-14279

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00002-MMH-MCR-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARNOLD CLAYTON, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(April 8, 2015)

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Charles L. Truncale, counsel for Arnold Clayton, has filed a motion to 

withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent 

Case: 14-14279 Date Filed: 04/08/2015 Page: 1 of 2 
2

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of 

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals 

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and 

Clayton’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 14-14279 Date Filed: 04/08/2015 Page: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF EARNINGS OF BENTHOS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARY CONTAINED ELSEWHERE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,474
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,448
<ALLOWANCES>                                       220
<INVENTORY>                                      4,974
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,409
<PP&E>                                           7,230
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,025
<BONDS>                                          3,863
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           110
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,867
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,865
<SALES>                                         20,553
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,553
<CGS>                                           12,080
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,289
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,114
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     8
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 402
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    746
<INCOME-TAX>                                       224
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                522
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       522
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .38<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37<F1>

<FN>
<F1>THE EARNINGS PER SHARE INFORMATION HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS
NO.128 AND BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN PLACE OF
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>

</TABLE>
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Mark Lana, of HS3 Technologies, Inc., hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q
of HS3 Technologies, Inc. for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of HS3 Technologies, Inc.

Dated April 29, 2009

*/s/ Mark Lana*Mark Lana Chief Executive
Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director (Principal Financial Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

---
**
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, Robert Rossitto, certify that: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal yearended December 31, 2023 of Apollo Asset Backed Credit Company LLC; 

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 
(b)
[Intentionally omitted]; 

 
(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 
(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

 
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 
 Date: March 28, 2024   
/s/ Robert Rossitto
 Robert Rossitto Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)**
# IfcO-ZS' 

# ELECTRONICRECORD [^lmlS COA # 07-13-00149-CR OFFENSE: 22.021 Ernest Glenn Benton v. The State 

## STYLE: ofTexas COUNTY: Collingsworth COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 100th District Court DATE: 12/09/14 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 2878



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Ernest Glenn Benton v. The State of 

### STYLE: Texas CCA#: 

# APPELLANT'S Petition CCADisposition: _ FORDISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCAIS: DATE: 

## R^L>5&J> JUDGE: 

# DATE: Owl#/jots' SIGNED: 

# 14>0-/5T \4>l-/5

JUDGE: 

# fjuCt, fAAAS&>1— PUBLISH: REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC RECORD
# FLY 

# HABANA

Greetings , 

### FAA sU A Ss Ame nd me nt t o Exe mption Sect i on 333 of t h e FAA Ref o rm Act

Fly Habana , LLC has proudly been issued an exemption , Regulatory Docket No FAA-2014-1004 and exemption numbered 112 84 (hereinafter the Exemption) for the purpo se of cond ucting unmanned aircraft system (UAS) aerial photography for motion picture , television, and the content creation industry for scripted closed set filming. Fly Habana , LLC hereby respectfully requests an amendmen t to the exemption to allow the below li sted additional type of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that full y c omplies with the conditions of the Ex emption. F ly Habana LLC. , wishes to additionally operate a DJI SIOOO , DJI S900 , DJI Inspire , Phantom I , II and II I , XX8LI Zenmuse , X8 Zenmuse under the same tem1s and conditions contained in the Exemption. Sent under separate cover is the Flight Operations and Pro c edur e s Manual (FOPM) for the additional UAS

. All op e rati o n s o f the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of the Exemption

. As this is an amendment to an existing exemp ti on asking only for the addition of another type of unmann ed aerial v ehicle , Fly Habana, LLC

. respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice does not need to be p ublished in the Federal Register for the requested amendment. P le as e f eel free to contact the un dersigned should you have any question or concerns concerning this request for an amendment to the Exemption

. Sincerely ,

# ~ Mark Eberle , Director of Flight Operations Fly Habana 8670 66th Ct N Pinellas Park , FL 33782 844-359-4222 phone 818 -448-5367 cellphone 646

- 224

- 6118 fax



### A Creative Aer i al Company (8 44) FlyHabana 

### I (8 44 ) 359-4222 

### www .FiyHabana . com P age 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 17, 2009

s0610 

# Order

June 17, 2009

138275

KEVIN KELLER, Petitioner-Appellant,

v SC: 138275 COA: 287440 Ingham CC: 07-001643-AA PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM and PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondents-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 14, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY



### , C.J., and C AVANAGH 

### and H ATHAWAY



### , JJ., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32-2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Lexington Precision Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, the President, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 that, to the undersigned's knowledge:

      (1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                            /s/  Warren Delano
                                            ------------------
                                            Warren Delano
                                            President
                                            (Co-Principal Executive Officer)
                                            April 14, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification will not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference.
#### Lola K. NEVAQUAYA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. M-79-631.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

July 14, 1980.

*83Marvin Liddell, Ardmore, for appellant.

Jan Eric Cartwright, Atty. Gen., C. Elaine Alexander, Asst. Atty. Gen., Cary E. Hiltgen, Legal Intern, for appellee.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

On appeal from a conviction in the District Court of Carter County for the offense of Assault and Battery, Case No. CRF-78-101, Lola K. Nevaquaya, appellant, raises two assignments of error.

It is first contended that it was error to charge the appellant with the instant charge in addition to three misdemeanors — Resisting An Officer, Driving Under the Influence and Eluding An Officer, — all alleged to be part of one criminal transaction. We reject this contention under the facts of this case for reasons set out in *Tucker v. State,*Okl.Cr., 481 P.2d 167 (1971). The fact that crimes are committed in rapid succession does not negate the fact that separate crimes were committed.

As to the second assignment of error, it is contended that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the prosecutor to cross examine Appellant concerning a similar incident occurring much earlier that same day in Norman, Oklahoma, in which Appellant attempted to elude a police officer attempting to make a traffic stop. We are of the opinion that the trial court did err in allowing inquiry into a separate and distinct offense for which Appellant had not been convicted. See *Roulston v. State,*Okl.Cr., 307 P.2d 861 (1957).

We are further of the opinion that the trial court compounded this error by permitting a police officer to testify as a rebuttal witness concerning the details of the Norman offenses, for the reason that it was impeachment of the Appellant on a collateral matter. See *Moon v. State,*Okl.Cr., 475 P.2d 410 (1970). See also 12 O.S.Supp.1978, § 2608 B, which provides that “(s)pecific instances of the conduct of a witness, for the purpose of attacking ... his credibility, other than conviction of crime as provided in Section (2609) of this code, may not be proved by extrinsic evidence.”

This case is REVERSED and REMANDED for a new trial with instructions that Appellant be tried on no greater offense than that for which she was convicted, Assault and Battery. See *S. H.*v. *State,*Okl.Cr., 555 P.2d 1050, appeal after remand 581 P.2d 916 (1976).

CORNISH, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
International Procurement Division Purchases

FY2017 - Quarter 2

Commodity Qty in MT PO Value Average Cost

BEANS, BLACK BAG-50 KG 570 $489,922.20 $859.51

BEANS, KIDNEY, DARK RED BAG-50 KG 30 $32,543.40 $1,084.78

BEANS, PINTO BAG-50 KG 390 $309,003.60 $792.32

BULGUR BAG-50 KG 2,040 $590,308.00 $289.37

BULGUR, SOY-FORT BAG-50 KG 130 $57,601.90 $443.09

CORNMEAL BAG-HP-25 KG 21,080 $8,298,264.40 $393.66

CORNMEAL, SOY-FORT BAG-HP-25 KG 340 $157,617.20 $463.58

CORN-SOY BLEND PLUS BAG-HP-25 KG 33,640 $21,323,488.90 $633.87

CSB SUPER CEREAL PLUS BOX-10/1.5 KG 1,660 $2,549,435.32 $1,535.76

FLOUR, ALL PURPOSE BAG-50 KG 1,010 $432,576.40 $428.29

LENTILS BAG-50 KG 4,250 $3,320,885.30 $781.38

OIL, SOYBEAN, CRUDE, DEGUMMED BULK 3,500 $2,775,500.00 $793.00

OIL, SUNFLOWERSEED PAIL-20 L 50 $115,827.63 $2,316.05

OIL, SUNFLWRSD BOTTLE, PLS-6/4 L 800-899 30 $59,187.93 $1,971.27

OIL, VEGETABLE BOTTLE, PLS-6/4 L 670-719 1,060 $1,195,134.95 $1,127.36

OIL, VEGETABLE CAN-6/4 L 24,330 $30,017,446.28 $1,233.74

OIL, VEGETABLE PAIL-20 L 140 $210,449.18 $1,503.12

PEAS, GREEN, SPLIT BAG-50 KG 150 $79,570.50 $530.47

PEAS, GREEN, WHOLE BAG-50 KG 10,860 $4,719,894.10 $434.61

PEAS, YELLOW, SPLIT BAG-50 KG 34,560 $23,467,586.30 $679.04

PEAS, YELLOW, WHOLE BAG-50 KG 2,430 $1,090,323.70 $448.69

RICE, 2/7 LG, W-MLD BAG-50 KG 5,920 $2,330,421.90 $393.65

RICE, 2/7 LG, W-MLD, FORT BAG-50 KG 810 $366,498.90 $452.47

RICE, 5/20 LG, W-MLD BAG-50 KG 920 $359,433.60 $390.69

RICE, 5/20 LG, W-MLD, FORT BAG-50 KG 7,100 $2,973,822.00 $418.85

RICE, 5/20 MG, W-MLD BAG-50 KG 60 $25,312.80 $421.88

RICE, 5/20 MG, W-MLD, FORT BAG-50 KG 200 $90,548.00 $452.74

RICE, MILLED BULK 40,120 $16,748,230.00 $417.45

SORGHUM BAG-50 KG 24,030 $5,111,573.10 $212.72

SORGHUM BULK 162,420 $26,563,187.60 $163.55

WHEAT, HARD RED WINTER BULK 74,120 $13,953,941.30 $188.26

WHEAT, SOFT WHITE BULK 62,920 $13,728,778.00 $218.19

Grand Total 520,871 $183,544,314.39 

Commodity Qty in EA PO Value Average Cost

BAGS, WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE- 50 KG 6,102,000 $2,434,430.92 $0.3990
1 

United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service 

Egg Producer Organizations Certified to Nominate Egg Board Members 

And Alternates Under the Egg Research and Promotion Order 

AREA II—Central States – 6 Members and 6 Alternates

(Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, 

Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Wisconsin) 

Jamie Guffey, Executive Director

Kentucky Poultry Federation

P.O. Box 1137 

Bowling Green, Kentucky 42102 

(270) 404-2277 

JGuffey@kypoultry.org

Allison Brink, Executive Director

Michigan Allied Poultry Industries

P.O. Box 144 

Hamilton, Michigan 49419 

(517) 372-5250 

allison@mipoultry.com

Joe G. Berry, Secretary-Treasurer

Oklahoma Egg Council 

2108 Countryside Drive 

Stillwater, Oklahoma 74074 

(405) 372-2872 

Jgb28Joe@gmail.com

Jo Manhart, Executive Director

Missouri Egg Council, Inc.

1000 West Nifong Blvd., Building 4, Room 201A 

Columbia, Missouri 65203 

(573) 874-3138 

manhartjo@gmail.com

Adam Sharp

Executive Vice President 

Rachel Rittinger (Assistant)

Ohio Farm Bureau Federation

P.O. Box 182383 

280 North High Street 

Columbus, Ohio 43218-2383 

(614) 246-8201 

asharp@ofbf.org
2 

Jim Chakeres

Executive Vice President

Ohio Poultry Association 

5930 Sharon Woods Blvd., Suite 102 

Columbus, Ohio 43229-2666 

(614) 882-6111 

(614) 882-9444 Fax

jchakeres@ohiopoultry.org

Rebecca Eifert Joniskan, President 

Indiana State Poultry Association 

Purdue University - Animal Sciences 

270 South Russell Street

West Lafayette, Indiana 47907 

(765) 494-8517 Office

(317) 646-2453 Cell

rjoniska@purdue.edu

Marvin Childers, President 

The Poultry Federation – Arkansas 

P.O. Box 1446 

Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 

(501) 375-8131 

(501) 375-5519 Fax

marvin@thepoultryfederation.com

Ken W. Koelkebeck

Executive Secretary/Treasurer 

Illinois Poultry Industry Council 

282 Animal Science Lab 

1207 West Gregory Drive 

Urbana, Illinois 61801 

(217) 244-0194 

(217) 333-7861 Fax

kkoelkeb@illinois.edu

Dr. Ron Kean 

Secretary-Treasurer 

Wisconsin Poultry & Egg Industry Association 

1675 Observatory Drive 

Madison, Wisconsin 53706 

(608) 262-8807 

(608) 262-5157 Fax

RPKean@wisc.edu 
3 

Dr. Denise L. B. Heard 

U.S. Poultry & Egg Association 

1530 Cooledge Road 

Tucker, Georgia 30084 

(770) 635-9060 Office 

(470) 991-7206 Cell 

(770) 493-9257 Fax

dheard@uspoultry.org
FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 04/13/2015 4:24:38 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
Exhibit 32

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF  OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED

We are providing this Certificate pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C., Section 1350. It
accompanies OfficeMax Incorporated's annual report on Form 10-K (the "Report") for the year ended December 27, 2008.



I,
Sam K. Duncan, OfficeMax Incorporated's chief executive officer, certify that:

(i)    the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(ii)    the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, OfficeMax Incorporated's financial condition and results of operations.

/s/ SAM K. DUNCAN Sam K. Duncan
Chief Executive Officer


I,
Bruce Besanko, OfficeMax Incorporated's chief financial officer, certify that:

(i)    the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(ii)    the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, OfficeMax Incorporated's financial condition and results of operations.

/s/ BRUCE BESANKO Bruce Besanko
Chief Financial OfficerDated: February 25, 2009


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OfficeMax Incorporated and will be retained by OfficeMax Incorporated and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks