alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 78 (Monday, April 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 24178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9745]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1826]


Reorganization/Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 127 Under 
Alternative Site Framework, Columbia, SC Area

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (74 
FR 1170-1173, 01/12/2009; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/2009; 75 FR 
71069-71070, 11/22/2010) as an option for the establishment or 
reorganization of general-purpose zones;
    Whereas, the Richland-Lexington Airport District, grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone 127, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ 
Docket 57-2011, filed 09/23/11) for authority to reorganize and expand 
under the ASF with a service area of Aiken, Allendale, Bamberg, 
Barnwell, Calhoun, Clarendon, Edgefield, Fairfield, Kershaw, Lee, 
Lexington, McCormick, Newberry, Richland, Saluda and Sumter Counties, 
South Carolina, within and adjacent to the Columbia Customs and Border 
Protection port of entry, FTZ 127's existing Site 1 would be 
categorized as a magnet site, and Site 2 would be categorized as a 
usage-driven site;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (76 FR 61075-61076, 10/03/11) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize and expand FTZ 127 under the 
alternative site framework is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the 
Board's regulations, including Section 400.28, to the Board's standard 
2,000-acre activation limit for the overall general-purpose zone 
project, and to a three-year ASF sunset provision for usage-driven 
sites that would terminate authority for Site 2 if no foreign-status 
merchandise is admitted for a bona fide customs purpose by April 30, 
2015.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of April 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    ATTEST:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9745 Filed 4-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT 31.1








RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) CERTIFICATION (SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)











I, Andrew J. McMonigle, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2023-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.








Date: May 26, 2023








/s/ Andrew J. McMonigle


Name: Andrew J. McMonigle


Title: Vice President and Treasurer


(Senior officer in charge of securitization)


Company: CarMax Auto Funding LLC


as Depositor on behalf of CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2023-1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,670
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,390
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        532
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,437
<PP&E>                                         459,237
<DEPRECIATION>                                  92,232
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 441,882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,407
<BONDS>                                         55,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        100
<COMMON>                                         2,926
<OTHER-SE>                                     328,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   441,882
<SALES>                                         78,072
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               131,330
<CGS>                                           70,476
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  202,691
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,139
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,301
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (71,361)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,878
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (45,233)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (45,233)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.55)
        

</TABLE>
# AVS



# Quality Management System Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with S8 QPM# 

### AIR-ANM-lI30-F7 Date: December 17. 2008 Revision 

### 1 

# Record ofContacts FDMS Docket No. FAA~() ?_. _'

# :1_1

_ With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)? 

# , -.c;·;' ~{jTganization 

## 'C,... ' ,

## ""-

# '.

" 

## r~,(son COlitat'tel't,_. !,late 

## . 

## ... 

# .. ATA Joe White 10/13/09

UNCONTROLLED COpy WHEN DOWNLOADED Check the Master List to Verify That This Is the Correct Revision Before Use
# National Former Prisoner of War Recognition Day, 2012

For more than 200 years, members of our Armed Forces have upheld an oath to protect and defend. In times of war, generations have answered our country’s call with courage and valor, braving the peril of combat and pressing onward in the face of tremendous adversity. Their extraordinary service reflects our highest ideals, and their sacrifice will forever live on in our national memory. On National Former Prisoner of War Recognition Day, we pay solemn tribute to those patriots who gave their freedom to preserve our own.

Thousands of America’s sons and daughters have suffered unspeakably as captives in foreign lands. Many prisoners of war experienced physical torture and profound anguish, subjected to inhumane treatment and cut off from their comrades, their country, and their loved ones. Some would never return. Yet, in the direst circumstances, these service members demonstrated indomitable courage and unbreakable resolve. They stood fast for what they believed in, making immeasurable sacrifices for the millions they protected. At home, spouses, children, parents, and friends called upon that same spirit of perseverance to sustain them through long periods of prayer and uncertainty.

When he chronicled the experiences of our GIs during World War II, Ernie Pyle wrote that their world can never be known to the rest of us. Though the sacrifices they made and the burdens they bore may defy our full understanding, it is our moral obligation to keep faith with our men and women in uniform, our veterans, and their families—to honor their service through the support of a grateful Nation. Today, we recognize heroes who endured one of war’s most tragic costs. For them, and for all who have served, let us rededicate ourselves to fulfilling the sacred trust we share with all those who have worn the uniform of the United States of America.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim April 9, 2012, as National Former Prisoner of War Recognition Day. I call upon all Americans to observe this day of remembrance by honoring all American prisoners of war, our service members, and our veterans. I also call upon Federal, State, and local government officials and organizations to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ninth day of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand twelve, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-sixth.

[FR Doc. 2012-9019

Billing code 3295-F2-P
March 12, 2008

Ms. Judith Katz (3APOO) RE CE \I.D Director

Air Protection Division

,-,

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Region

.

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Dear M>:

This letter is in reference to Delaware’s December 13, 2007 State Implementation

Plan (SIP) revision entitled, “State Implementation Plan Revision For Ozone, Fine particulate

Matter (PM25),and Visibility.” This SIP revision, which was subject to public notice and

comment, addressed the requirements of Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 11 0(a)(2)(A)-(M) thatare relevant to the eight-hour ozone and fine particulate matter (PM2.5)National Ambient Air

Quality Standards (NAAQS). The purpose ofthis letter is to: 1) clarify the information

provided in that SIP revision under the discussion of 11 0(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), and 2) certify as to

Delaware’s compliance with CAA Sections 1 10(a)(2)(C) and (J) for PM25,and that the

substantive requirements of CAA Sections 1 10(a)(2)(C) and (J) arc addressed in Delaware’s

December 13, 2007 SIP revision.

The SIP, under the discussion of 11 0(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), makes the statement, “Major

sources are subject to NNSR and PSD permitting programs implemented in accordance with

EPA ‘s interim guidance callingfor use ofPMjoas a surrogate for PM25 related to

nonattainment and PSD NSR program requirements.” I would like to clarify that the “interim

guidance” referred to is the April 5, 2005 Steven D. Page memorandum entitled

“Implementation of New Source Review Requirements in PM2.5Nonattainment Areas,” and

the October 23, 1997 John Seitz memorandum entitled “Interim Implementation of New

Source Review Requirements for PM2.5”

In addition to the above clarification, this letter is also intended as a certification of

Delaware’s compliance with CAA Sections 1 10(a)(2)(C) and (J) for PM2.5It is Delaware’s

De€a4’ae ‘a 9ood Taiae Vefteid4 O RECYCLED PAPER
for PM25,acknowledging that: the State of Delaware is following EPA’s PM10 surrogateguidance documents, specifically, the April 5, 2005, Steven D. Page memorandum entitled“Implementation of New Source Review Requirements in PM2.5 Nonattainment Areas,” and theOctober 23, 1997 John S. Seitz memorandum entitled “Interim Implementation ofNew Source

Review Requirements for PM2.5,”referenced therein.

Thank you for your consideration ofthis clarifying information. If you have any

questions or would like to discuss this matter further, please contact Ron Amirikian or me at

(302) 739-9402.

Sincerely,

Ali Mirzakhalili, P.E.Administrator

cc: Ron Amirikian
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED C HARLES P. MUISE , A ppellant ,
v. Case No

. 5D 21

- 1658 LT Cas e No. 2019-100683

- CFDL STAT E OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed January 17, 2023 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County , Dawn D

. Nichols , J udge. Paula C. Coffman, of

L aw O ffice o f

P aula Coffman, O rlando, for

A ppellant. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Roberts J

. Bradford, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C .J., EVANDER an d WALLIS , JJ. , c oncur

.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9521]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--3D PDF Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 27, 2012, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), 3D PDF Consortium, Inc. (``3D 
PDF'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities 
of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the 
venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the 
Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are PROSTEP AG, Dolivostr, Darmstadt, GERMANY; Adobe 
Systems Incorporated, San Jose, CA; Anark Corporation, Boulder, CO; 
Aras Corporation, Andover, MA; Tetra 4D, LLC, Seattle, WA; Tech Soft 
3D, Berkeley, CA; and EOS Solutions Corporation, Rochester, MI.
    The general areas of 3D PDF's planned activity are (a) to 
demonstrate the value and promote the use of products complying with 
standards enabling three dimensional representation, such as 3D PDF, 
the PRC data format, and PDF/E 2.0 (``Specifications''); (b) to 
communicate information regarding the updating and the development of 
existing and additional Specifications beneficial to providers and 
consumers of three dimensional rendering solutions; and (c) to educate 
international standards committees and government bodies about the 
needs of developers and users of Specification-compliant products and 
services.
    In support of these purposes, 3D PDF may engage in some or all of 
the following activities: (a) Host committees that develop materials in 
support of 3D PDF's mission; (b) operate a branding program based upon 
distinctive trademarks to create high customer awareness of, demand 
for, and confidence in products designed in compliance with 
Specifications; (c) create printed and electronic materials for 
distribution to members and non-members; (d) maintain its own Web site; 
(e) coordinate the promotion of Specifications among members and non-
members, as well as create basic marketing promotional collateral 
(e.g., both web pages as well as tangible materials); (f) maintain 
relations with standard-setting organizations and industry consortia to 
promote coherence among Specifications; and (g) undertake such other 
activities as the Board of Directors may from time to time approve. 3D 
PDF is not engaged in and does not intend to engage in production 
activities.

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-9521 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Hi, I have two major needs for growing of Industrial Hemp: One, Is to produce a Fiber that could replace the current Plastic Fiber that is being used to make Net Wrap for Large Round Forage Bails, this plastic Fiber does not decompose and gets lodged in the livestock's Rumen causing Death to the animal, Most producers have to cut this wrap off the Bails and dispose by burning, not good for our environment! Two, the more important issue for me would be to grow more standing forage for my livestock on Marginal land where it would; control weeds, improve soil, Habitat for wildlife, and reduce the need for Chemicals in our environment! Thanks for considering my inputs.

David S. Hieb

South Dakota
Exhibit 32

Section 1350
Certifications

---

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of CommunitySouth Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company), each certify that, to his knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed
               with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
               Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:   May 11, 2007 |  | By:   /s/  C. Allan Ducker, III                             
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | C. Allan Ducker, III                                        
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
       (Principal Executive Officer)

|Date:   May 11, 2007 |  | By:   /s/ John W. Hobbs                                     
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | John W. Hobbs                                               
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
       (Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>

[LOGO]KPMG
                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

Chartered Accountants

Crown House              Mailing Address:              Telephone (441) 295 5063
4 Par-la-Ville Road      P.O. Box HM 906              Fax (441) 295 9132
Hamilton HM 08           Hamilton HM DX               Email kpmg@kpmg.bm
Bermuda                  Bermuda


The Board of Directors
The Bank of Bermuda Limited

We consent to the use of our report included herein and to the reference to our
firm under the heading "Experts" in the registration statement.

/S/ KPMG

KPMG
Chartered Accountants
Hamilton, Bermuda
April 22, 2002

[LOGO] KPMG
Opinion issued November 21, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 17
- 00489
- CR

——————————— KENNETH BENJAMIN , Appella nt

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 10th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 16CR1879

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Kenneth Benjamin , pleaded guilty to the felony offense of accident involving serious bodily injury

. See T EX
. T RANSP
. C ODE § 550.021(c)(1)(B)

. The trial court found appellant guilty and, in accordance with the terms of appellant’s2

plea bargain agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to 4 years’ incarceration. Acting pro se, a ppellant filed a notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal. In a pl ea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certific ation showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id . The trial court’s certification states that this is a p lea bargain case and that the defendant has no right of appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, w e must dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea

- bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohi bited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Brown. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2(b).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0668

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

NICHOLAS WELLS,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable David J. Grubich, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 24 2024

07/24/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0668