alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CANCELLATION OF PROMISSORY NOTES**

**AND**

**STOCK POWER**

THE UNDERSIGNED, in connection with the memorialization of the joint venture between the undersigned parties, hereby acknowledge and agree to the following:

(a)

All promissory notes entered into by and between any of the undersigned parties (the “Notes”) are permanently cancelled, and, subject to paragraph (b) below, all payments obligations are hereby fully satisfied.  

(b)

As full and complete payment of the Notes, Dourave Mineracao e Exploracao Mineral Ltda., an entity organized under the laws of Brazil (“Dourave Brazil”), hereby assigns, conveys, delivers, and transfers, by it signature below, one-third (1/3rd) of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock (the “Shares”) which Dourave Brazil owns in Dourave-Bullion Mineracao e Exploracao Mineral LTDA., a business entity organized under the laws of Brazil (the “Subsidiary”) to Bullion Monarch Mining, Inc., a Utah corporation.  Dourave country-regionplaceBrazil does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint the current, respective officers of the Subsidiary as attorneys-in-fact to transfer said Shares on the books and records of the Subsidiary, with full power of substitution in the premises.  

DATED this 29th day of June, 2010.  
| DOURAVE MINERACAO E EXPLORACAO MINERAL LTDA., a business entity organized under the laws of country-regionBrazil and the state of placePara 

By:/s/Sergio Aquino

Name:  Sergio Aquino

Title:  Director

Dourave Mining and Exploration Inc., 

a corporation organized under the laws of country-regionplaceCanada

By:/s/Ruari McKnight

Name:  Ruari McKnight

Title:  Director / VP Exploration

BULLION MONARCH MINING, INC., a StateplaceUtah corporation

By:/s/R. Don Morris

Name:  R. Don Morris

Title:  President

DOURAVE-BULLION, LLC, a StateplaceUtah limited liability company

By:/s/R. Don Morris

R. Don Morris

Title: Manager |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
cc: Hon. Denise L. Gentile, District Judge, Family Court Division Michael Doty Robinson Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947A 2
H. R. 1198 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 404 South 

Boulder Highway in Henderson, Nevada, as the ‘‘Henderson Veterans Memorial 

Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. HENDERSON VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 404 South Boulder Highway in Henderson, 

Nevada, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Henderson Veterans 

Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Henderson Veterans Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### Andrew J. Chancey, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

Where no errors are made to appear in a criminal cause, and the appellate court is of the opinion that the evidence supports the verdict, the judgment of conviction will be affirmed.

This case was decided by Division A.

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Lee county.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*L. A. Hendry, Jno. W. Burton*(with whom was *F. C. Alderson*on the brief), for plaintiff in error.

*W. H. Ellis,*Attorney 'General, and *H. S. Phillips,*State Attorney for 6th Judicial Circuit of Florida for the state.

Shackleford, C. J.

— Andrew J. Chancey, tile plaintiff in error, was indicted for murder at the spring *21term of the circuit court for Lee county, tried at the same term, convicted' of manslaughter and sentenced to a term of five years in the state prison. He seeks reversal of the judgment and sentence here by writ of error.

Several errors are assigned, but all of them have been abandoned here except the single proposition as to the sufficiency of the evidence.

We have given the evidence our careful consideration and are of .the opinion that it is amply sufficient to support the verdict. We find nothing which would warrant or justify us in setting the verdict aside, therefore the judgment must be affirmed, and it is so ordered, at the cost of the county of Lee. See Smith v. State, 49 Fla. 33, 38 South. Rep. 599, and Tatum v. State, 49 Fla. 67, 38 South. Rep. 601.

Cockrell and Whitfield, JJ., concur.

Taylor, Hocicer and Parkhill, JJ., concur in the opinion.
<PAGE>
 
                                                  Commission File Number 1-5881
                                                  -----------------------------





                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                  FORM 10-K/A

                       AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION OR REPORT
                  Filed Pursuant to Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of
                      THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



                      BROWN & SHARPE MANUFACTURING COMPANY
                      ------------------------------------
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

                                AMENDMENT NO.  1



     The undersigned registrant hereby amends the following items, financial
statement, exhibits or other portions of its Annual Report for the year ended
December 31, 1996, on Form 10-K as set forth in the pages attached hereto:

     The Exhibit Index and Exhibits are amended to reflect the addition of the
following:

     "Exhibit 28.1 - Annual Report on Form 11-K for The Brown & Sharpe Savings
and Retirement Plan for Management Employees for the year ended December 31,
1996."

     "Exhibit 28.2 - Annual Report on Form 11-K for The Brown & Sharpe Savings
and Retirement Plan for the year ended December 31, 1996."

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this amendment to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                 Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Company



                                 By: /s/ Alfred J. Corso
                                    ------------------------------------
                                    Alfred J. Corso
                                    Controller
                                    (Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Harpreet Singh Sangha, the Chief Executive Officer, and Herminder Rai, the Chief Financial Officer, of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Harpreet S. SanghaHarpreet S. SanghaPresident,Chief Executive Officer and a director 
Date:  October 20, 2010
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Herminder RaiHerminder RaiSecretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer 
Date:  October 20, 2010          

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

__________
SERVED: JANUARY 25, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

GRANT AVIATION, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-1266 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011AL030046) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Brent R. Cole, Respondent's Counsel 

Law Office of Brent R. Cole, P.C. 

821 N Street, Suite 208 

Anchorage, AK 99501 

TEL: 907-277-8001 

FAX: 907-277-8002 

ONE COPY 

Glenn H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel 

Alaskan Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 W. 7th Avenue #14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5271 

FAX: 907-271,.2800 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-1266 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by US. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-4~0. 

-2-
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________

No. 07-15-00105-CV 

________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF L.C., A CHILD 

 

 

On Appeal from the 364th District Court 

Lubbock County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2012-502,200; Honorable William R. Eichman II, Presiding 

 

April 15, 2015 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

 Appellant, D.C., filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order modifying the 

parent-child relationship. By letter dated March 24, 2015, the Clerk of this Court

advised D.C. that a filing fee of $195 was overdue and noted that failure to submit 

payment within ten days would subject the appeal to dismissal pursuant to Rule 42.3(c) 

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

D.C. has not responded, paid the filing fee, nor made other arrangements for the 

discharge of the clerk’s filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b). Unless a party is 
2

excused from paying a filing fee, the Clerk of this Court is required to collect filing fees 

set by statute or the Texas Supreme Court when an item is presented for filing. See id. 

at 5, 12.1(b). Although the filing of a proper notice of appeal invokes an appellate 

court’s jurisdiction, if a party fails to follow the prescribed rules of appellate procedure, 

the appeal may be dismissed. Id. at 25.1(b). 

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with a directive from 

this Court requiring action within a specified time. Id. at 42.3(c).

Per Curiam
NRS 34.170, and "an appeal generally constitutes an adeqUate and speedy 

remedy precluding writ relief," Cote H., 124 Nev. at 39, 175 P.3d at 908. 

Petitioner has a speedy and adequate legal remedy available 

in the form of an appeal, NRS 177.015(3); NRS 177.045, and we are not 

persuaded that our intervention is warranted. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition-.DENIED. 

R 

Gibbons 

cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge 

Julie Raye Law, LLC 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1.947A
#### In the Matter of Gus Franklin, Petitioner, v Robert Hoke, as Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility, Respondent.

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which continued petitioner’s placement in involuntary protective custody.

Although the Hearing Officer did not personally interview the confidential informants but instead relied on in camera testimony and a report of correction officers who interviewed the informants, the record shows that the Hearing Officer had a sufficient basis to make his own independent assessment of the informants’ credibility *(cf., Matter of Wynter v Jones,*135 AD2d 1032). The officers reported independent investigations during which they had conversations with various persons describing incidents where petitioner committed extortive acts. The descriptions were given by persons unacquainted with each other and described a common pattern of behavior of petitioner towards inmates. The information given by the officers was sufficiently detailed and specific to provide an objective basis for concluding that the informants were credible *(cf., Matter of Kalonji v Coughlin,*157 AD2d 941; *see, Matter of Harris v Coughlin,*116 AD2d 896, *lv denied*67 NY2d 610, 1047).

Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund XI, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 12, 2008



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                              
|Paritosh K. Choksi                                  
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial       
|Services, LLC (Managing Member)                     

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1171 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to ensure that revenues collected 

from passengers as aviation security fees are used to help finance the 

costs of aviation security screening by repealing a requirement that 

a portion of such fees be credited as offsetting receipts and deposited 

in the general fund of the Treasury. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2019 

Mr. DEFAZIO (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. KATKO, Miss 

RICE of New York, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Ms. TITUS, 

Mr. LAWSON of Florida, Mrs. DEMINGS, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. 

BROWNLEY of California, Mr. PAPPAS, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. SIRES, Mr. 

CARBAJAL, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. HECK, Ms. NORTON, 

Mr. WELCH, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. HUFFMAN, 

Ms. PINGREE, Mr. SOTO, and Mr. MCEACHIN) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to ensure that revenues collected from passengers as aviation security fees 

are used to help finance the costs of aviation security 

screening by repealing a requirement that a portion of 

such fees be credited as offsetting receipts and deposited 

in the general fund of the Treasury. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1171 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Funding for Aviation 

3 Screeners and Threat Elimination Restoration Act’’ or the 

4 ‘‘FASTER Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT REGARDING CREDITING 

6 AND DEPOSIT OF A PORTION OF AVIATION 

7 SECURITY FEES. 

8 (a) REPEAL.—Section 44940 of title 49, United 

9 States Code, is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (c), by striking paragraph (3); 

11 (2) in subsection (f)— 

12 (A) by striking the heading and inserting 

13 ‘‘DEPOSIT AND AVAILABILITY OF FEE.—’’; 

14 (B) by striking paragraph (1); 

15 (C) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and 

16 (3) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively; and 

17 (D) by amending paragraph (1), as so re18 designated, to read as follows: 

19 ‘‘(1) shall be deposited into a separate account 

20 in the Treasury, which shall be available to the Ad21 ministrator for expenditure only to pay the costs of 

22 activities and services for which the fee is imposed; 

23 and’’; and 

24 (3) by striking subsection (i). 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1171 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (d)(4) 

2 of such section is amended by striking ‘‘, other than sub3 section (i),’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Official Listing of Operations Included on the USDA SVS Grass Fed Program

Operation Marketing Claim Products Verification Information

Page 1 of 1

Last Revised April 02, 2024

Bunny Bear Ranch

6680 Schindler Rd

Newcastle, CA 95658

Contact: Wesley Johnson

E-mail: Johnsonconcrete1@gmail.com

Phone: 916-704-8997

• USDA Grass (Forage) Fed 

Claim for Ruminant Livestock 

and the Meat Products 

Derived from Such Livestock 

in accordance with the SVS 

Grass Fed Program.

Livestock: Sheep

Ewes, Lambs and Yearlings

Verified by:

Livestock and Poultry Program

Quality Assessment Division

Certificate No: GF4033RSA

Effective Date: February 2, 2024

Renewal Date: February 2, 2026

Caddo Springs Farm

1700 W Hwy 175

Frankston, TX 75763

Contact: C. Todd Prejean

E-mail: ctoddp@hotmail.com

Phone: 520-861-2665

• USDA Grass (Forage) Fed 

Claim for Ruminant Livestock 

and the Meat Products 

Derived from Such Livestock 

in accordance with the SVS 

Grass Fed Program.

Livestock: Sheep

Ewes, Lambs, Yearlings

Verified by:

Livestock and Poultry Program

Quality Assessment Division

Certificate No: GF4053RSA

Effective Date: February 22, 2024

Renewal Date: February 22, 2026

Little Metz Family Farm

5486 West State Road 26

Rossville, IN 46065

Contact: Dianne Little

Email: Dianne.m.little@gmail.com

Phone: 919-395-0534

• USDA Grass (Forage) Fed 

Claim for Ruminant Livestock 

and the Meat Products 

Derived from Such Livestock 

in accordance with the SVS 

Grass Fed Program.

Livestock: Sheep

Ewes, Lambs, Yearlings

Verified by:

Livestock and Poultry Program

Quality Assessment Division

Certificate No: GF2195RSB

Effective Date: July 14, 2022

Renewal Date: July 14, 2024

Sunrise Ranch

100 Sunrise Ranch Road

Loveland, CO 80538

Contact: Sarah Schnedecker

Email: sunrisebeef@sunriseranch.org

Phone: 303-638-3341

• USDA Grass (Forage) Fed 

Claim for Ruminant Livestock 

and the Meat Products 

Derived from Such Livestock 

in accordance with the SVS 

Grass Fed Program.

Livestock: Sheep

Lambs

Verified by:

Livestock and Poultry Program

Quality Assessment Division

Certificate No: GF2154JBA

Effective Date: June 3, 2022

Renewal Date: June 3, 2024
U. S. Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF COTTON

FOR RELEASE AT 12:00 P.M. CT April 14, 2021

USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of Cotton. The cotton bales were sold under 

the SEAM dated April 13, 2021.

The following cotton offers were 

sold using the SEAM:

Offer No. Catalog Location Pounds 

Sold Bales Sold

Price Sold 

(per 

Pound)

CCC Revenue 

TS1104366 MANNING, SC 108,081 215 0.7200 $77,818.32

108,081 215 $77,818.32
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00239-CR

MARK EUGENE ENGLE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court No. 29,110

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Court reporter Julie Vrooman recorded the trial court proceedings in cause number 06-14-

00239-CR, styled Mark Eugene Engle v. The State of Texas, trial court cause number 29,110 in 

the 354th Judicial District Court of Hunt County, Texas. The reporter’s record was originally due 

in this matter January 29, 2015. That deadline was extended twice by this Court on Vrooman’s 

request, resulting in the most recent due date of April 1, 2015. Vrooman has now filed a third 

request seeking an additional extension of the filing deadline.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure establish that “trial and appellate courts are jointly 

responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c). The 

Rules further instruct that an “appellate court may enter any order necessary to ensure the timely 

filing of the appellate record.” Id. In furtherance of our responsibilities established by the Rules, 

we find we must take steps to ensure that the record in this case is filed in a reasonable amount of 

time.

Therefore, we overrule Vrooman’s third request for an extension of the filing deadline and 

hereby order her to file the reporter’s record in cause number 06-14-00239-CR, styled Mark 

Eugene Engle v. The State of Texas, trial court cause number 29,110 in the 354th Judicial District 

Court of Hunt County, Texas, to be received by this Court no later than Wednesday, April 22, 

2015.

If the reporter’s record is not received by April 22, we warn Vrooman that we may begin 

contempt proceedings and order her to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of this 

Court for failing to obey its order.
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: April 14, 2015