24192 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 78 / Monday, April 23, 2012 / Notices 

estimates that it would cost $401,810 to 

abandon the Tate Island facilities. 

Any questions regarding this 

application should be directed to 

Michele Willis, Manager, Regulatory & 

Compliance, CenterPoint Energy Gas 

Transmission Company, LLC, P.O. Box 

21734, Shreveport, Louisiana 71151, or 

via telephone at (318) 429–3708. 

There are two ways to become 

involved in the Commission’s review of 

this project. First, any person wishing to 

obtain legal status by becoming a party 

to the proceedings for this project 

should, on or before the comment date 

stated below, file with the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 

First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, 

a motion to intervene in accordance 

with the requirements of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) 

and the Regulations under the NGA (18 

CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party 

status will be placed on the service list 

maintained by the Secretary of the 

Commission and will receive copies of 

all documents filed by the applicant and 

by all other parties. A party must submit 

14 copies of filings made with the 

Commission and must mail a copy to 

the applicant and to every other party in 

the proceeding. Only parties to the 

proceeding can ask for court review of 

Commission orders in the proceeding. 

However, a person does not have to 

intervene in order to have comments 

considered. The second way to 

participate is by filing with the 

Secretary of the Commission, as soon as 

possible, an original and two copies of 

comments in support of or in opposition 

to this project. The Commission will 

consider these comments in 

determining the appropriate action to be 

taken, but the filing of a comment alone 

will not serve to make the filer a party 

to the proceeding. The Commission’s 

rules require that persons filing 

comments in opposition to the project 

provide copies of their protests only to 

the party or parties directly involved in 

the protest. 

Persons who wish to comment only 

on the environmental review of this 

project should submit an original and 

two copies of their comments to the 

Secretary of the Commission. 

Environmental commenters will be 

placed on the Commission’s 

environmental mailing list, will receive 

copies of the environmental documents, 

and will be notified of meetings 

associated with the Commission’s 

environmental review process. 

Environmental commenters will not be 

required to serve copies of filed 

documents on all other parties. 

However, the non-party commenters 

will not receive copies of all documents 

filed by other parties or issued by the 

Commission (except for the mailing of 

environmental documents issued by the 

Commission) and will not have the right 

to seek court review of the 

Commission’s final order. 

The Commission strongly encourages 

electronic filings of comments, protests 

and interventions via the Internet in lieu 

of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a) (1) 

(iii) and the instructions on the 

Commission’s Web site (www.ferc.gov) 

under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on May 4, 2012. 

Dated: April 13, 2012. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9652 Filed 4–20–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. EL12–55–000] 

SIG Energy, LLLP v. California 

Independent System Operator 

Corporation; Notice of Complaint 

Take notice that on April 4, 2012, 

pursuant to section 206 of the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission’s 

(Commission) Rules and Practice and 

Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206 and sections 

206 and 306 of the Federal Power Act, 

16 U.S.C. 824(e) and 825(e), SIG Energy, 

LLLP (Complainant) filed a formal 

complaint against the California 

Independent System Operator 

Corporation (Respondent) alleging that 

the Respondent violated its open access 

transmission tariff (OATT) and the 

Respondent’s determination of the 

settlement price for congestion revenue 

rights contracts at certain pricing nodes 

on certain dates in August 2011 resulted 

in unjust and unreasonable rates, in 

violation of the filed rate doctrine and 

the Respondent’s OATT and related 

Business Practice Manuals. 

The Complainant certifies that public 

version copies of the complaint were 

served on the contacts for the 

Respondent as listed on the 

Commission’s list of Corporate Officials 

and on the California Public Utilities 

Commission. 

Any person desiring to intervene or to 

protest this filing must file in 

accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). 

Protests will be considered by the 

Commission in determining the 

appropriate action to be taken, but will 

not serve to make protestants parties to 

the proceeding. Any person wishing to 

become a party must file a notice of 

intervention or motion to intervene, as 

appropriate. The Respondent’s answer 

and all interventions, or protests must 

be filed on or before the comment date. 

The Respondent’s answer, motions to 

intervene, and protests must be served 

on the Complainants. 

The Commission encourages 

electronic submission of protests and 

interventions in lieu of paper using the 

‘‘eFiling’’ link at http://www.ferc.gov. 

Persons unable to file electronically 

should submit an original and 14 copies 

of the protest or intervention to the 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 

888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 

20426. 

This filing is accessible on-line at 

http://www.ferc.gov, using the 

‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for 

review in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room in Washington, DC. 

There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the 

Web site that enables subscribers to 

receive email notification when a 

document is added to a subscribed 

docket(s). For assistance with any FERC 

Online service, please email 

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call 

(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call 

(202) 502–8659. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on April 24, 2012. 

Dated: April 13, 2012. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9653 Filed 4–20–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. EL12–56–000] 

Energy Spectrum, Inc. and Riverbay 

Corporation v. New York Independent 

System Operator; Notice of Complaint 

Take notice that on April 12, 2012, 

pursuant to section 205 of the Federal 

Power Act and Rule 206 of the Rules of 

Practice and Procedure of the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission 

(Commission), 18 CFR 385.206, Energy 

Spectrum, Inc. and Riverbay 

Corporation (Complainants) collectively 

filed a formal complaint against New 

York Independent System Operator 

(Respondent or NYISO) alleging that the 

Respondent violated the Federal Power 

Act, the Commission’s orders and 

policies, and the NYISO’s Market 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES