alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     I, Sundaresan Raja, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Airbee Wireless, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s first fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   /s/ Sundaresan Raja Sundaresan Raja  Chief Executive Officer     May 15, 2006  
46
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 354TH DISTRICT COURT OF RAINS COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 21st

day of January, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

SUSAN JACKSON HOLDEN AND TERRY HOLDEN, Appellants

NO. 12-13-00165-CV; Trial Court No. 9,140

Opinion by James T. Worthen, Chief Justice.

CHARLES LYLE HOLDEN, AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE

ESTATE OF ROSIE EUNICE HOLDEN, DECEASED, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the oral arguments, appellate record and the briefs 

filed herein, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was error in 

the judgment as entered by the trial court, and that the same should be affirmed in part and 

reversed and rendered in part.

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that the portion of the trial 

court’s judgment awarding $25,587.73 in damages to CHARLES LYLE HOLDEN, AS 

INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ROSIE EUNICE HOLDEN, 

DECEASED is reversed and judgment rendered instead in the amount of $11,276.24; that in 

all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with the opinion of 

the court; that all costs of this appeal are hereby assessed equally amongst the parties; and that 

this decision be certified to the court below for observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 7

th day of April, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R. Clay Hulette, the Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.





/s/R. Clay
      HuletteR.
      Clay HuletteVice
      President and Chief Financial OfficerMay
      17, 2010
Exhibit 12.1



Boston Edison Company

Computation of Ratio of
Earnings to Fixed Charges

Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2004

(in thousands)



|                                                      |  |   |        
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | - | -------
|Net income from continuing operations                 |  | $ | 134,130
|Income taxes                                          |  |   | 89,997 
|Fixed charges (including securitization certificates) |  |   | 106,282
|                                                      |  |   |        
|Total                                                 |  | $ | 330,409
|                                                      |  |   |        
|Interest expense                                      |  | $ | 83,838 
|Interest component of rentals                         |  |   | 22,444 
|                                                      |  |   |        
|Total                                                 |  | $ | 106,282
|                                                      |  |   |        
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                    |  |   | 3.11   
|                                                      |  |   |
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Furio Resources Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Paul Fong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Patrick McGrath, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





By /s/ Paul Fong

Paul Fong

Chief Executive Officer

April 5, 2005





By /s/ Patrick McGrath

Patrick McGrath

Chief Financial Officer

April 5, 2005
From: Chris Hornback [mailto:CHornback@NACWA.ORG] 

Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 2:44 PM

To: Behl, Betsy

Subject: RE: 2014 Draft Updates to EPA Recommended Human Health Ambient Water Quality Criteria

Betsy –

Thanks again for meeting with us last week to discuss the bacteriophage criteria development efforts.

On the human health criteria, NACWA is actively reviewing the draft updates, but would like to request 

another 30-60 days beyond July 14 to complete its review. The technical nature of these issues will 

dictate that we get some outside assistance to help in preparing our comments. We don’t have the 

expertise in-house, but we would like to review everything carefully.

Please let me know if the Agency would consider an extension. 

Thank you,

Chris

_______________________________________________________________________________

Chris Hornback | Senior Director, Regulatory Affairs | National Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA)

(O) 202/833-9106 | (M) 703/798-5714 | chornback@nacwa.org
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Company of our report dated February 4, 2000
(except for Notes 2 and 11, as to which the date is February 29, 2000), included
in the 1999 Annual Report to Shareholders of Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing
Company.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Brown & Sharpe
Manufacturing Company listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based
on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to
above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 2-33676, 2-56821, 2-77219, 2-77575, 2-83637, 2-97935, 33-17831,
33-23601, 33-23603, 33-30927, 33-54496, 333-07733, and 333-91367) pertaining to
employee benefit plans, of Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Company of our report
dated February 4, 2000 (except for Notes 2 and 11, as to which the date is
February 29, 2000), with respect to the consolidated financial statements
incorporated herein by reference, and our report included in the preceding
paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.



                                                 ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Providence, Rhode Island
March 24, 2000


                                       1
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DANIEL MATHIEU

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 1177

[ October 8, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Robert E. Belanger

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562013CF002822B

.

Daniel Mathieu, Blountstown, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, F ORST and K UN TZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on March 30, 2012, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the                           ( print page 23755)                        National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), OpenSAF Foundation (“OpenSAF”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Emerson Network Power-Embedded Computing, Tempe, AZ; and Tail-f Systems AB, Stockholm, SWEDEN, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and OpenSAF intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 8, 2008, OpenSAF filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 16, 2008 (73 FR 28508).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 4, 2012. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on January 31, 2012 (77 FR 4828).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2012-9522 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 12.1

 

 

Boston Edison CompanyComputation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed ChargesTwelve Months Ended December 31, 2005(in thousands)

 
| Net income from continuing operations                 |    | $      | 131,248                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| Income taxes                                          |    |   | 85,577                        |
| Fixed charges (including securitization certificates) |    |   |    93,014      |
|    Total                               |    | $      | 309,839=======                |
|                                                  |         |   |                          |
| Interest expense                                      |    | $      | 87,761                        |
| Interest component of rentals                         |    |   |     5,253 |
|    Total                               |    | $      | 93,014======                  |
|                                                  |         |   |                          |
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                    |    |   | 3.33======                    |
|                                                  |         |   |                          |

 

 

Exhibit 12.2

 

 

Boston Edison CompanyComputation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Chargesand Preferred Stock Dividend RequirementsTwelve Months Ended December 31, 2005(in thousands)

 

 
| Net income from continuing operations                 |    | $      | 131,248                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| Income taxes                                          |    |   | 85,577                        |
| Fixed charges (including securitization certificates) |    |   | 93,014                        |
|    Total                               |    | $      | 309,839=======                |
|                                                  |         |   |                          |
| Interest expense                                      |    | $      | 87,761                        |
| Interest component of rentals                         |    |   |     5,253 |
|    Subtotal                            |    |   | 93,014                        |
| Preferred stock dividend requirements                 |         |   |     3,238 |
|    Total                               |         | $      | 96,252======                  |
|                                                  |         |   |                          |
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                    |    |   | 3.22=====                     |
|                                                  |         |   |                          |
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 0524

_____________________________
F REDERICK S TRAIN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Angela C. Dempsey , Judge

. May 11, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

. W OLF , B ILBREY , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

__ ___________________________

Frederick Strain, pro se
, Appellant.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Barbara Debelius, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Page 1 of 2

DRAFT DELETION DOCKET CONTENTS [FOLDER REFERENCE]

Dames & Moore. 1994. Interim Remedial Action - Remedial Design Final Design Submittal.

[6-Design Plans and Specifications]

Dames & Moore. 1997. Revised Draft Remedial Investigation Report. [1-Remedial 

Investigation Feasibility Study]

Dames & Moore. 1998. Draft Feasibility Study Report, NSA a Division of Southwire, 

Hawesville, Kentucky, EPA Docket #97-10-C. [1-Remedial Investigation Feasibility Study]

Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet, Department for Environmental Protection, Division 

of Waste Management. 2011. Remedial Action Report Approval, National Southwire 

Aluminum Superfund Site, AI ID #1634, Hawesville, Hancock County, Kentucky. [7-

Construction Inspection Reports]

United States Department of Justice. 1994. Consent Decree. [3-Consent Decree]

United States Department of Justice. 2001. Consent Decree. [3-Consent Decree]

URS. 2006. Remedial Design Final Design Submittal. [6-Design Plans and Specifications]

URS. 2008. Operations and Maintenance Manual for OU1, OU2, and South Slurry Pond

Remedial Action Activities. [8-Operations and Maintenance Plan]

URS. 2011. National Southwire Aluminum Superfund Site, Remedial Action Report for 

Operable Unit No. 1 (OUI) and Operable Unit No. 2 (OU2). [7-Construction Inspection 

Reports]

U.S. EPA. 1993. Interim Record of Decision, National Southwire Aluminum Company

Superfund Site. [2-Record of Decision ESD SOW]

U.S. EPA. 1993. Interim Statement of Work for the Remedial Design and Interim Remedial 

Action at the National Southwire Aluminum Company Superfund Site. [2-Record of Decision 

ESD SOW]

U.S. EPA. 1994. Explanation of Significant Differences, National Southwire Aluminum 

Company Superfund Site, Hawesville, Kentucky. [2-Record of Decision ESD SOW]
Page 2 of 2

U.S. EPA. 1995. Action Memorandum for the National Southwire Aluminum Company Site, 

Hawesville, Kentucky. [4-Action Memoranda]

U.S. EPA. 2000. Final Record of Decision, National Southwire Aluminum NPL Site, 

Hawesville, Hancock County, Kentucky. [2-Record of Decision ESD SOW]

U.S. EPA. 2000. Statement of Work for the RD/RA at the National Southwire Aluminum 

CERCLA NPL Site, Hawesville, Hancock County, Kentucky Company. [2-Record of Decision 

ESD SOW]

U.S. EPA. 2006. Final Remedial Design Approval, National Southwire Aluminum Superfund 

Site, Hawesville, Kentucky. [6-Design Plans and Specifications]

U.S. EPA. 2008. Preliminary Close Out Report, National Southwire Aluminum Superfund Site, 

Hawesville, Hancock County, Kentucky. [9-Preliminary Closeout Report]

U.S. EPA. 2011. Approval of Remedial Action Report Operable Unit One (OUI) and Two 

(OU2), National Southwire Aluminum Superfund Site, Hawesville, Kentucky. [7-Construction 

Inspection Reports]

2010. Recorded Environmental Covenants for Southwire Company and Century Aluminum. 

[10-Institutional Controls]
Exhibit 12.1   NSTAR Electric Company Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2006 (in thousands)   Net income from continuing operations$154,354Less: Equity income from investees479Plus: distributed income of equity investees807Income taxes98,937Fixed charges (including securitization certificates)96,879Total$350,498Interest expense$91,544Interest component of rentals (estimated as one-third of rental expense)5,335Total$96,879Ratio of earnings to fixed charges3.62    Exhibit 12.2   NSTAR Electric Company Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2006 (in thousands)    Net income from continuing operations (before preferred stock dividend)$154,354Less: equity income from investees479Plus: distributed income of equity investees807Income taxes98,937Fixed charges (including securitization certificates)96,879Total$350,498Interest expense$91,544Interest component of rentals (estimated as one-third of rental expense)5,335Subtotal96,879Preferred stock dividend requirements3,216Total$100,095Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividend requirements3.50