alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS PUBLIC MEETING ON RESIDENTIAL 

FURNACE FANS ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington, DC 20585

Friday, July 27, 2012

Room 8E-089

Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) seeks comments, information, and data from interested 

parties on the Energy Conservation Standard (ECS) Preliminary Analyses for residential 

furnace fans.

Agenda

9:00 – 9:15 am Welcome; Introductions; and Agenda Review

Doug Brookman

9:15 – 10:00 am Purpose of Public Meeting; Opening Statements; Comment 

Submission Instructions; and Regulatory Authority and 

Rulemaking Overview 

Mohammed Khan

10:00 – 10:45 am Market and Technology Assessment; and Screening Analysis

Sam Jasinski

10:45 – 11:00 am Break

11:00 – 11:45 am Engineering Analysis

Sam Jasinski

11:45 – 12:30 pm Markups; Energy Use Characterization; and LCC and 

Payback Period Analysis

Alex Lekov

12:30 – 1:30 pm Lunch (on your own)

1:30 – 2:15 pm LCC and Payback Period Analysis (cont.)

Alex Lekov
2:15 – 2:45 pm National Impact Analysis

Alex Lekov

2:45 – 2:55 pm Break

2:55 – 3:15 pm Preliminary Manufacturer Impact Analysis

Sam Jasinski

3:15 – 3:30 pm Next Steps

Sam Jasinski and Alex Lekov

3:30 – 4:00 pm Closing Remarks from Interested Parties

Mohammed Khan

4:00 pm Adjourn
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2022-4 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify andrepresent that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofJuly 20, 2022, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2022-4 and Citibank, N.A. (the “Agreement”) during the period thatis the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 

SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.
By: /s/ Marc Womack
Name:
 
Marc Womack

Title:
 
EVP, Head of Operations

Date:
 
March 31, 2023
By: /s/ Vikas GuptaName: Vikas Gupta
Title:
 
Treasurer

Date:
 
March 31, 2023
**
EXHIBIT (23)(i)
 
 
 
 
 
 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT
 
 
 
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-57577 of Borden Chemical, Inc. (formerly Borden, Inc.) on Form S-3 of our reports for Borden Chemical, Inc.dated March 19, 2004 (which report on the Consolidated Financial Statements expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the Companys adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard. No. 142), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Borden Chemical, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 Columbus, Ohio
 
 March 26, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Comments should be received on or before May 21, 2012 to be assured of consideration.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Send comments regarding the burden estimate, or any other aspect of the information collection, including suggestion for reducing the burden, to (1) Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for Treasury, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503, or email at                         *OIRA_Submission@OMB.EOP.GOV*                         and (2) Treasury PRA Clearance Officer, 1750 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Suite 8140, Washington, DC 20220, or on-line at                         *www.PRAComment.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling (202) 927-5331, email at                         *PRA@treasury.gov,*                         or the entire information collection request may be found at                         *www.reginfo.gov.*

## Bureau of the Public Debt (BPD)

*OMB Number:*                         1535-0036.                    

*Type of Review:*                         Extension without change of a currently approved collection.                    

*Title:*                         Application by Voluntary Guardian of Incapacitated Owner of United States Savings Bonds/Notes.                    

*Form:*                         PD F 2513.                    

*Abstract:*                         Used by voluntary guardian of incapacitated bond owner(s) to establish right to act on behalf of owner.                    

*Affected Public:*                         Individuals or Households.                    

*Estimated Total Burden Hours:*                         2,600.                    

Dawn D. Wolfgang,

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-9490 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-39-P
**                Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, R. Clay Hulette, the Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| /s/ R. Clay   Hulette                        |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                              |   |
| R. Clay   Hulette                            |   |
| Vice   President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| May 15, 2007                                 |   |
#### Frances Gus, Respondent, v Town of North Hempstead et al., Defendants, and Scala Contracting Co., Inc., Appellant.

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Scala Contracting Co., Inc., appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.), dated August 4, 1989, as denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it and any cross claims against it.

*650Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the appellant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it is granted, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

The plaintiff sustained injuries on January 26, 1987, when she slipped and fell inside a bus shelter located on the south side of Hillside Avenue just east of Lakeville Road in the Town of North Hempstead. The complaint alleged, *inter alia,*that the Town failed to properly maintain the bus shelter, that it pushed snow and ice into the shelter in the course of plowing Hillside Avenue, and that Scala Contracting Co. (hereinafter Scala), negligently cleared snow from the parking lots abutting the bus shelter.

The County of Nassau conceded that it owned the bus shelter, and that it had contracted with a third party for snow removal at a cost of $7.16 per shelter, per cleaning. Furthermore, the defendant Scala’s agreement to remove snow on the premises of the defendant Pearle Vision Center, Inc., did not encompass snow removal of, or maintenance of, the sidewalk adjacent to the bus shelter. Scala’s assertions in its cross motion for summary judgment were not controverted by any party. Nor has any other party submitted opposition to this appeal.

Once a movant has established its cause of action or defense sufficiently to warrant a court directing judgment in its favor as a matter of law, the party opposing the motion must produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to require a trial of material questions of fact. In this case, no opposing proof has been presented.

Notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s finding that "there exists the possibility that he [Scala] may have pushed snow into the shelter from the parking lot side”, we conclude that Scala established its defense sufficiently to warrant judgment in its favor as a matter of law. Kunzeman, J. P., Kooper, Sullivan and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
#### Glenn BLANK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The POLICE PENSION BOARD OF the CITY OF WRAY, Colorado, and the City of Wray, a Municipal Corporation, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 80CA0061.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

May 22, 1980.

*1157Francis A. Benedetti, Wray, for plaintiff-appellee.

Thomas J. Callahan, Wray, for defendants-appellants.

VAN CISE, Judge.

Defendants, the Police Pension Board and the City of Wray, appeal the judgment of the district court which reversed the Board and ordered it to grant the application of plaintiff, Glenn Blank, for a disability pension. We affirm.

It is undisputed that since 1967 plaintiff has been a member of the Police Department of the City of Wray, a municipality with a population under 100,000. At all times during his employment, a percentage of his pay has been deducted for deposit into the policemen’s pension fund maintained by the city pursuant to § 31-30-301, et seq., C.R.S.1973.

In 1979, plaintiff, then 67 years old, applied to the Board for retirement and a pension based on hearing problems. After an evidentiary hearing, the Board found that plaintiff’s hearing loss disabled him for his present occupation, that this disability started prior to 1967 and had been very steadily progressive, and that, therefore, the disability was not service connected. It concluded that, because the disability was not service connected, plaintiff was not eligible for a pension, and denied his application.

On review, the district court determined that the controlling statute was § 31-30-321(l)(b), C.R.S.1973, which provides:

> “If any member or officer of such police department becomes mentally or physically disabled so as to render necessary his retirement from service in such department, the board of trustees shall retire such member from service in such department, and he shall receive from the pension fund an amount equal to one-half of the monthly salary received by him at the time he becomes so disabled.”

The court accepted the findings of the Board that plaintiff’s disability was not service connected. It then ruled that, since there was no requirement in the statute that the permanent disability be service connected, the Board’s denial of the application was reversed. The Board was ordered to commence paying a monthly pension in an amount equal to one-half of plaintiff’s monthly salary, effective 30 days from the date of his last employment.

We agree with the district court. As stated in *Board of Trustees of Policemen’s Pension Fund v. Starasinich,*128 Colo. 556, 264 P.2d 1033 (1954):

> “[W]e must accept the law as enacted and not undertake to read into the statutes or ordinances requirements or conditions not imposed by the Legislature and thus change the law by judicial construction.”

Judgment affirmed.

COYTE and KIRSHBAUM, JJ., concur.
T HIS P LACE -H OLDER P AGE R EPLACES THE

S PECTRAL AND A NALYTICAL D ATA C LAIMED CBI

(12 PAGES )
Page 1 of 1 

Instructions for KC-386 

POWER OF ATTORNEY 

Warehouse operators use this form, jointly with KC-1230, to appoint an agent to 

represent the warehouse in connection with CCC Storage Agreements. 

Submit the original of the completed form in hard copy or facsimile to the Kansas 

City Commodity Office, P.O. Box 419205, Stop 8748, Kansas City, MO 64141-6205; 

FAX 816-926-1426. For questions or assistance, contact Commodity Management 

Division, Storage Contract Branch at 816-926-6446. 

Features for transmitting the form electronically are available to those customers 

with access credentials only. If you would like to establish online access credentials 

with USDA, follow the instructions provided at the USDA eForms web site.

Warehouse Operators must complete Items 1 through 5. 

Items 1-5 

Fld Name /

Item No. 

Instruction 

1 

Date 

Enter date Power of Attorney is prepared. 

2 

Principal 

Enter name of warehouse as principal. 

3 

Agent and 

Attorney-inFact 

Enter the name of person appointed by the principal as agent to act and 

sign legal documents for the warehouse in connection with the Storage 

Agreement. 

4 A – E 

Signature 

Item 4A. Enter the name of the warehouse as it appears in Item 2. 

Item 4B. Enter the street address, city, state, and zip code of the 

warehouse. 

Item 4C. Enter the signature of an authorized individual, i.e., corporate 

officer, partner, member, or proprietor. 

Item 4D. Enter the title of the person signing for the warehouse. 

Item 4E. Enter the date this form KC-386 is signed. 

5 

Witness(es) 

Enter the signature(s) of person(s) witnessing the individual signing for 

the warehouse and affix corporate seal in space provided.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2070

L. RUTHER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DISCOUNT TIRE CO. OF VA, INC.; GG HOSPITALITY, LLC,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:16-cv-01046-LO-MSN)

Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

L. Ruther appeals the district court’s order summarily

dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed 

in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Ruther v. Discount Tire Co. of VA, Inc.,

No. 1:16-cv-01046-LO-MSN (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2016). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 07-15-00097-CV

In the Interest of I.S.S. and G.P.S.,

Children

§

§

§

§

From the 320th District Court

 of Potter County

April 8, 2015

Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated April 8, 2015, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that this appeal be dismissed.

It is further ordered that appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended for which

let execution issue.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

FILE COPY
Page 1 of 2 **DRAFT DELETION DOCKE T CONTENTS**  **[FOLDER REFERENCE]** Dames & Moore. 1 994. Interim Remedial Action - Remedial Design Final Design Submittal. [6-Design Plans and Specifications] Dames & Moore. 1 997. R evised Draft Remedial Investigation Report. [1 -Remedial Investigation Feasibility Study ] Dames & Moore. 1 998. D raft Feasibility S tudy R eport, NSA a Division of Southwire, Hawesville, Kentuck y, EPA Docket #97 - 10 - C. [1 - Remedial Investigatio n Feasibility Study ] Kentuck y Energy

and Environment Cabinet, Department for Environmental Protection, Division of Waste Management. 2 011. R emedial Action Report Approval , National Southwire Aluminum Superfund Site, AI I D #1634, Hawesville, Hancock Coun ty , Kentucky . [7- Construction Inspection Reports] United States Department of Justice. 1994. Consent Decree. [ 3 - Consent Decree

] United States Department of Justice. 2001. Consent Decree. [ 3 - Consent Decree

] URS. 2006. Remedial Design Final Design Submittal. [6-Design Plans and Specifications] URS. 2 008. Operations and Maintenance Manual for OU1, OU2 , and South Slurry P ond Remedial Action Activities . [ 8 - Operations and Maintenance Plan] URS. 2 011. N ational Southwire Aluminum Superfund Site, Rem edial Action Report for Operable Unit No. 1 (OUI) and Operable Unit No. 2 (OU2). [7- Construction Inspection Reports] U.S. EPA. 1 993. In terim Record of Decision, National Southwire Aluminum Company Superfund Site. [

2 -Record of Decision ESD SOW ] U.S. EPA . 1 993. In terim Statement of Work for the Remedial Design and In terim Remedial Action at the National Southwire Aluminum Company S uperfund Site. [

2 -Record of Decision ESD SOW

] U.S. EPA. 1 994. E xplanation of Significant Differences, National Southwire Aluminum Company Superfund Site, Hawesville, Kentucky . [ 2 -Record of Decision ESD SOW ]Page 2 of 2

U.S. EPA. 1 995. A ction Memorandum for the National Southwire Aluminum Company S ite, Hawesville, Kentuck y. [4 - Action Memoranda] U.S. EPA. 2000. Final Record of Decision, National Southwire Aluminum NPLS ite, Hawesville, Hancock County , Kentucky . [ 2 -Record of Decision ESD SOW ] U.S. EPA. 2 000. S tatement of Work for the RD/RA at the National Southwire Aluminum CERCLA NPLS ite, Hawesville, Hancock C ounty , Kentucky C ompan y. [

2 -Record of Decision ESD SOW

] U.S. EPA. 2 006. F inal Remedial Design Approval, National Southwire Aluminum Superfund Site, Hawesville, Kentucky . [6-Design Plans and Specifications] U.S. EPA. 200 8 . Preliminary Close Out Report , National Southwire Aluminum Superfund Site, Hawesville, Hancock County , Kentucky . [ 9 -Preliminary Closeout Report ] U.S. EPA. 2 011. Approval of Remedial Action Report Operable Unit One (OUI) and Two (OU2), National Southwire Aluminum Superfund Site, Hawesv ille, Kentucky . [7- Construction Inspection Reports] 2010. R ecorded Environmental Covenants for Southwire Company and Century

A luminum. [10 -Institutional Controls]
<Page>



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus and Statement of Additional
Information constituting part of this Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 to the
registration statement (Form N-4 No. 33-71686) (the "Registration Statement")
of our report dated February 15, 2002, relating to the financial statements of
First Fortis Life Insurance Company, which appears in such Prospectus and
Statement of Additional Information. We also consent to the use in the
Statement of Additional Information constituting part of this Registration
Statement of our report dated April 6, 2001, relating to the financial
statements of First Fortis Life Insurance Company Separate Account A, which
appears in such Statement of Additional Information. We also consent to the
reference to us under the heading "Independent Public Accountants" in such
Statement of Additional Information.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 17, 2002
Jeremy Nichols 

<jnichols@wildearthguardi

ans.org>

11/23/2010 09:55 PM

To LisaP Jackson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

cc Gina McCarthy/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Bruce 

Moore/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, CCG-ONG@EPA, Ted 

Zukoski <tzukoski@earthjustice.org>, Michael Freeman 

<mfreeman@earthjustice.org>, Mike Eisenfeld 

<meisenfeld@frontier.net>

Subj

ect

Oil and Gas Regulatory Review, Report on Methane Controls

Dear Administrator Jackson:

On behalf of WildEarth Guardians, San Juan Citizens Alliance, and Earthjustice, please find 

attached a report detailing strategies to achieve significant and cost-effective methane reductions 

nationwide from the oil and gas sector. As detailed within, reductions in methane emissions 

from a variety of sources is more than achievable with available technologies and practices, and 

can help put the nation on track for a 90% or greater reduction sector-wide. 

We provide this report to help inform the EPA in its review of the New Source Performance 

Standards and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the oil and gas 

sector. A hard copy has also been sent via certified mail. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Jeremy Nichols

--

Jeremy Nichols

Climate and Energy Program Director

WildEarth Guardians

1536 Wynkoop, Suite 301 - Denver, CO 80202

303-573-4898 x 1303

www.wildearthguardians.org

Read my blog on the Huffington Post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeremy-nichols/

Join our e-mail list today 

http://wg.convio.net/site/Survey?ACTION_REQUIRED=URI_ACTION_USER_REQUESTS&

SURVEY_ID=1241
WildEarth Guardians has earned a Four Star rating from Charity Navigator. View our profile 

http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=9974

Cover Letter and 

Final Report on Methane Controls for Oil and Gas.pdf