alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

VICTOR MANUEL FIGUEREOMARTINEZ,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 93 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of August, 2017, in consideration of the Motion for 

Withdrawal of Counsel, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of 

Northampton County for that court to determine whether Petitioner’s current counsel 

should be granted leave to withdraw. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 120(B) (providing that an 

attorney may not unilaterally withdraw his or her appearance with respect to a criminal 

defendant; rather, a court must determine whether leave to withdraw is warranted). 

If current counsel is permitted to withdraw, the court is DIRECTED to resolve any 

issues relative to Petitioner being appointed counsel or granted leave to proceed pro se. 

The Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County is DIRECTED to enter its order 

regarding this remand within 45 days and to promptly notify this Court of its 

determination.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-20303

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

ANGEL ALFARO-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:17-CR-695-1

Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Angel AlfaroHernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Alfaro-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 23, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-20303 Document: 00514694016 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/23/2018
No. 18-20303

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-20303 Document: 00514694016 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/23/2018
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 108 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 108

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 18, 2020

Mr. Amash submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United 
                                States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Total expenditures for a year shall not exceed the 
average annual revenue collected in the three prior years, adjusted in 
proportion to changes in population and inflation. Total expenditures 
shall include all expenditures of the United States except those for 
payment of debt, and revenue shall include all revenue of the United 
States except that derived from borrowing.
    ``Section 2. Congress may by a roll call vote of two-thirds of each 
House declare an emergency and provide by law for specific expenditures 
in excess of the limit in section 1. The declaration shall specify 
reasons for the emergency designation and may authorize expenditures in 
excess of the limit in section 1 for up to one year.
    ``Section 3. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by 
appropriate legislation.
    ``Section 4. This article shall take effect in the first year 
beginning at least 90 days following ratification, except that 
expenditures may exceed the limit in section 1 by the following portion 
of the prior year's expenditures exceeding that limit (excepting 
emergency expenditures provided for by section 2): nine-tenths in the 
first year, eight-ninths in the second, seven-eighths in the third, 
six-sevenths in the fourth, five-sixths in the fifth, four-fifths in 
the sixth, three-fourths in the seventh, two-thirds in the eighth, and 
one-half in the ninth.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23







INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statement  Nos.
2-54345,  2-63803,  2-75715, 2-88474, 2-96491, 33-32465 and 33-57537 on Form S-8
and in Registration Statement Nos. 33-55136,  33-53817,  33-57325,  33-59784 and
333-631 on Form S-3 of our report  dated  October 30,  1996,  appearing  in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bergen  Brunswig  Corporation  for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1996.




/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
-------------------------
Costa Mesa, California
December 27, 1996
United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service 

 Federal Grain Inspection Service 

 Quality Assurance and Compliance Division

 Revision: 10-2023

VERIFICATION OF STATEMENTS, RECORDS, AND TRAINING DOCUMENT

This document must be completed when submitting your internal audit to QACD. Without completion of 

this document, your internal audit will not be reviewed.

Please provide training verification records separately to QACD that must include the auditors full name, 

date the auditor training was completed, training description, and/or the specific training material.

I verify that all statements, records, and auditor training verification submitted during this internal audit 

are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, and belief. I understand that false statements made 

herein and/or falsifying official documents or records are subject to the penalties identified in 18 U.S. 

Code § 1001.

 

_____________________________________________ __________________

Signature - Official Service Provider Responsible Official Date

___________________________________________________________________ 

Printed Name – Official Service Provider Responsible Official (Please print or type)

__________________________________________

Official Service Provider Name (Please print or type)
From: "Frey, Nathan J." <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Beth Hassett

- Sipple/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Nicole

Owens/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Sarah Rees/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 12/12/2012 02:42 PM Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments under EOs 12866 and 13563

-- PM NAAQs Final Rule

Attached pl ease find a summary of additional interagency comments under EOs

12866 and 13563 regarding the PM NAAQs final rule. Please let me know if you

have any questions.

### Summary of Interagency Working Comments on Draft Language under

EO12866/13563 Interagency Review. Subject to Further Policy Review.

Exceptional Events

1) Preamble p. 538: Interagency commenters suggest removing the following sentence: “Recently released draft exceptional events guidance that clarifies key provisions of the 2007 Exceptional Events Rule, provides examples of best practices, and streamlines the documentation development process, will help air agenc ies submit information in a timely manner.”

The draft Guidance according to EPA was intended to address High Wind Events which is not the focus of the discussion on page 538. In addition the Guidance fails to address the crushing load of work state agen cies can anticipate with the large number of days that have been affected by exceptional events including wildfires (see WESTAR letter: http://www.westar.org/Docs/NEP/WESTAReer083112.pdf ). In addition, EPA stated in the draft High Wind Event Guidance that it was developing approaches for fire which has not been produced to date.

2) Interagency commenters suggest modifying the following sentence: “The EPA intends to work with potentially aff ected areas to prioritize events potentially influencing compliance with the primary annual PM 2.5 NAAQS.”

Change to: “As many wildfire impacts cross multiple EPA Regions, the EPA will provide annually a model screening of potentially wildfire affected ar eas to provide initial documentation and demonstration of events potentially influencing compliance with the primary annual PM 2.5 NAAQS.”

The frequency of monitoring data influenced by wildfires, many on federal lands, is growing substantially and with th e tighter primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS, will potentially affect nonattainment designation. Without substantial investment by EPA into EER demonstrations, there is a high likelihood that wildfire impacted data will add to designation of nonattainment and/or i nflated high design days. See Draft Guidance to Implement Requirements for the Treatment of Air Quality Monitoring Data Influenced by Exceptional Events (PDF) and specifically Attachment 1, Draft Exceptional Events Rule Frequently Asked Questions (PDF) , Page 15, part of Response to Question 13. Modeling of wildfire emissions is a costly and tec hnically challenging exercise considering the frequency of impacts in 2010

- 2012. In addition, many of the incidents and their impacts span multiple EPA Regions which can lead to variable requirements and conditions for approval of state submitted

documenta tion packages. A centralized national approach would address a number

of concerns states have raised with the EER

.
c*o-t*r A^ IMNvL ulcer.To Ct^wr -r>W T^ few*

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

APR 13 2015.

Abel Acosta,Clerk
'Zoi6 X y^eetv/edl a notice/ -Wi/i "Vke, ^ Di&TOicr ole^k

(2.A*uiet> rfcVietued -Hneec iwrno/o^ /Vs' c&u^&Ti oO A^O

IF /utrreu^T^o to do eo \^y TH^b do-yv^T uoma4

TWAT -TVhe? davi^r or (M^iiviWAO Mppoi^u=> r4AD M&ji^qm

)4trT2^ TM^T AADT7 0AJS y/v 7Tf^ P*ppcrAO-A+>& "^~
V£ % (tcjKicr op

^pucA/or p£o-€*r. S of lexivs

U)1A3 Com£Sj S^^^lc&c^^Alt^^ A^plcc^r pzo-txr aO/2

er^rlW^ m^ ^ ^ ^T^^rtf^T www
Qj^ruerO OaJ 7° 0&>7~ft7<>P A 6oPl/t-e-fr070 A^O rnxxryi

tooa^s l^P 12*or pt^/m* *x> petrsavcer Ay-

/ohiw is, yu<*v &r^J A*TM*/ one

oZ of Afpt/ts^ Fbxrn^ Co>t*>sec ,* 7?^

tv/JotJar 77-Mr ^ J^T/O^ .^ioLMvrr^ ^f^f.

• A.i^i^nni /» ~n~)tr~ A>Arr>tr of. '•"_,_ j aoajvictt^0•

WI*-<
WfoU^iHiTTbO 7b Ufa? &5vtt£C OP CjLimY/O/^ P^pcn^ts

OF Tt^Ae //° T>fe App^Ac.

C*C£<ytTtO 0/0 TVfvS <7(<U>PCzTftUM ^^'^"^

U^(Pam OF & ^'6T- ^^pf^O^ci^rA^

6riA .
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 46 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to a national emergency declared by the President 

on February 15, 2019. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, pursuant to section 202 of the National Emer4 gencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622), the national emergency de5 clared by the finding of the President on February 15, 
2 

•HJ 46 EH 

1 2019, in Proclamation 9844 (84 Fed. Reg. 4949) is here2 by terminated. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 26, 

2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 46 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to a national emergency declared by the 

President on February 15, 2019.
8040.5



### 9. Contacts. With whom outside the FAA hasthis proposal beendiscussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response Natiollal Husincss Aircrafl Assodation Eli CoW I 

# 'iJL/PO - Region~11Airline Associ::.tioll Dave L01t('l"('r "6

# JLi/IG

- Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 

# C/j4)IO 

# - AT.'\. i\:( L-opez 

# 't)'1 

# j/U 

# - 09/29/06

Page 1\2-4
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

JAMES T. CAMPBELL

Justice

MACKEY K. HANCOCK

Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE

Justice

Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas

Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A

Amarillo, Texas 79101-2449

www.txcourts.gov/7thcoa.aspx

VIVIAN LONG

Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105-9540

(806) 342-2650

April 20, 2015

Danny Shead

TDCJ-ID#01484832

Tulia Transfer Facility

400 Hwy 86 West

Tulia, TX 79088

RE: Case Numbers: 07-15-00164-CV, 07-15-00165-CV, 07-15-00166-CV

Trial Court Case Numbers: 8460B, 8461B, 19154B

Style: Danny Shead v. The State of Texas

Dear Mr. Shead:

The Court has been advised that you have given notice of restricted appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 30. 

The causes in this Court will bear the cause numbers and style shown above. The notice was

accompanied by the documents requires by chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code to

permit you to proceed in these appeals without payment of costs, as well as by a docketing statement.

The Court sua sponte orders that the appellate records in cause numbers 07-15-00084-CV, 07-

15-00085-CV, and 07-15-00086-CV be transferred into the cause numbers referenced above and be

deemed filed as of April 20, 2015. Appellant’s brief is due to be filed on or before Wednesday, May 20,

2015, and must substantially comply with the requirements of Rule 38.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure.

In addition, as required by Texas Government Code, Sec. 51.204(d), the Court is notifying the

trial court clerk that all records filed with respect to this case with the exception of indexes, original

opinions, minutes, and general court dockets will be destroyed no earlier than six (6) years from the date

final mandates issue in these restricted appeals.

Very truly yours,

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

xc: Honorable John B. Board (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Harry Ingram (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Jo Carter (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

James A. Farren (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

FILE COPY
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, R. Clay Hulette, certify that: 

1.          I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp

2.          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.          The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.          The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

| Date: May   15, 2007 | /s/ R. Clay   Hulette                        |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                 |                                              |
|                 | R. Clay   Hulette                            |
|                 | Vice   President and Chief Financial Officer |
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

I, Svend-Olav Carlsen, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of PortalPlayer, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 8, 2005
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO.03

- 0 2

- 00 304

- CV

William O. Harrison

, Appellant

v.

State of Texas; City of Corpus Christi, Texas; Transit Authority of Corpus Christi, Texas; and Special Purpose District of Corpus Christi Crime Control, Texas , Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. GV100146 , HONORABLE FRANK J. MALONEY, JR. , JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant William O. Harrison filed an unopposed motion to dismiss his appeal, informing

this Court that the parties have executed a settlement agreement and requesting that this Court dismiss his

appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2).

David Puryear, Jus tice

Before Justices Kidd, Patterson and Puryear

Dismissed on Appellant =

s Motion

Filed: August 8, 2002

Do Not Publish
Cause Number WR-62,099-03

Robert Pruett

vs.

Williams Stephens,

Director, TDCJ, CID

__________________________________________________

Acknowledgement and Assent to Pruett’s 

Notice Regarding State’s Response to 

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

__________________________________________________

Pruett filed a Notice Regarding State’s Response to 

Petition for Writ of Prohibition, in which he asserted 

that the State’s Response included an erroneous 

assertion. Pruett is correct.

On page 6 of the State’s Response, this attorney 

wrote:

Two pairs of pants and a white towel that Baylor 

found in the trash can of the gym had Nagle’s 

blood on them. (R.R. 42:346-347, 350) A piece 

of cloth Baylor found in the hallway had Nagle’s 

blood on it. (R.R. 42:347)

WR-62,099-03

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 4/9/2015 10:59:39 AM

Accepted 4/9/2015 11:04:08 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK

 RECEIVED COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 4/9/2015 ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK 
The accurate facts are that the two pairs of pants, 

the white towel, and the piece of cloth all have Pruett’s 

blood on them, not Nagle’s. (RR 4:346-347, 350)

This attorney apologizes to the Court and to Counsel 

for this error. It was not intentional and it was not 

meant to mislead any person.

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Melinda Fletcher

Melinda Fletcher

Appellate Attorney

SBN 18403630

Special Prosecution Unit

P O Box 1744

Amarillo, Texas 79105

Phone 806.367.9407

Fax 866.923.9253

mfletcher@sputexas.org
Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of 

the foregoing Acknowledgement and Assent to Pruett’s

Notice Regarding State’s Response to Petition for Writ 

of Prohibition was served on David Dow and Jeff Newberry, 

the attorneys for Pruett, and Jefferson Clendenin, 

Assistance Attorney General, via electronic mail on this 

the 9th day of April, 2015.

/s/ Melinda Fletcher

Melinda Fletcher