alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A0994. BERTHA JACKSON v. COLFIN A1-GA 1, LLC.

This appeal was docketed on January 28, 2015. On February 6, 2015, thisCourt

granted Appellant’s first motion for an extension of time to file a brief and

enumeration of errors until March 4, 2015. On March 6, 2015, after expiration of the

extended deadline, Appellantfiled an untimely request for a second extension of time.

Appellant wasrequired to file her motion for an extension of time to file a brief

and enumeration of errors prior to the date the documents were due or risk having her

appeal dismissed. Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a). Moreover, this Court finds no good

cause for granting a further extension. Id. Accordingly, appellant’s untimely motion

for a second extension is DENIED and Case Number A15A0994 is hereby

DISMISSED for Appellant’s failure to file a brief and enumeration of errors in

support of her appeal.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/23/2015

March 23, 2015
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

IVAN DE JESUS LOPEZ-ILUSTRE,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-50097

D.C. No. 3:13-cr-03341-LAB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 7, 2015** 

Before: FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Ivan De Jesus Lopez-Ilustre appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 72-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 & 960. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

APR 13 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Lopez-Ilustre contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to

award him a mitigating role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. We review the

district court’s interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo, its application

of the Guidelines to the facts of the case for abuse of discretion, and its

determination that a defendant was not a minor participant for clear error. See

United States v. Hurtado, 760 F.3d 1065, 1068 (9th Cir. 2014).

Contrary to Lopez-Ilustre’s argument, the record shows that the district court

properly applied the Sentencing Guidelines and our precedent, basing its denial of

the adjustment on the totality of the circumstances and a comparison of LopezIlustre’s culpability to that of other individuals in the smuggling operation. See

U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(A), (C); Hurtado, 760 F.3d at 1068-69. The district

court appropriately required Lopez-Ilustre to establish his eligibility for the

mitigating role adjustment by a preponderance of the evidence. See United States

v. Zakharov, 468 F.3d 1171, 1181 (9th Cir. 2006). Moreover, the district court did

not clearly err in denying the mitigating role adjustment when Lopez-Ilustre

smuggled a significant quantity of a dangerous drug, was promised compensation

for his services, and used a vehicle registered in his own name to commit the

offense. See Hurtado, 760 F.3d at 1069.

2 14-50097
Lopez-Ilustre also argues that his sentence is substantively unreasonable

because it does not reflect his true culpability. The district court did not abuse its

discretion in imposing Lopez-Ilustre’s sentence. See United States v. RodriguezCastro, 641 F.3d 1189, 1194 (9th Cir. 2011). The below-Guidelines sentence is

substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and the totality

of the circumstances. See id.

AFFIRMED.

3 14-50097
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

1050 Thomas Jefferson Street N.W.

Washington, DC 20007-3877

(202) 298-1800 Fax (202) 338-2416

www.vnf.com

MEMORANDUM

- 1 -

TO: DOE Office of General Counsel

FROM: Doug Smith

DATE: February 13, 2012

RE: Disclosure of Permitted Communication Concerning Regional Standards 

Enforcement Framework Document -- Docket No. EERE-2011-BT-CE-0077

This memo provides an overview of communications made to DOE staff on the subject of a

policy for providing waivers from new regional furnace efficiency standards. The 

communications occurred at a meeting held at 2:00 pm on February 1, 2012, during the comment 

period on the Regional Standards Enforcement Framework Document. See 76 Fed. Reg. 76328 

(Dec. 7, 2011). 

Meeting attendees:

Dan Cohen (DOE/OGC)

Ashley Armstrong (DOE/EERE)

John Cymbalsky (DOE/EERE)

Celia Sher (DOE/OGC)

Eric Stas (DOE/OGC)

Paula Gant (American Gas Association)

Robin Roy (Natural Resources Defense Council)

Doug Smith (Van Ness Feldman)

Paula, Robin and Doug reported that they were working with an ad hoc coalition of stakeholders 

called “The Furnace Waiver Design Group.” That Group developed a detailed policy proposal 

on appropriate waivers from the new regional furnace standards. (The Group subsequently 

submitted comments in this docket on February 6, 2012. See Comments of the Air Conditioning 

Contractors of America, Alliance to Save Energy, American Council for an Energy-Efficient 

Economy, American Gas Association, Appliance Standards Awareness Project, Consumer 

Federation of America, National Consumer Law Center, Natural Resources Defense Council, and 

Plumbing, Heating, Cooling Contractors - National Association on Regional Standards 

Enforcement Framework Document.)
- 2 -

Paula, Robin and Doug made the following points:

- DOE should establish a process for providing waivers from the new regional furnace 

standard.

- Waivers should be available where pre-determined criteria are met and eligibility is 

documented by the installer. No case-specific application to, or action by, DOE should 

be required. 

- Waiver should be available only for furnace replacement in an existing home, and only if:

(a) building conditions or local regulatory restrictions effectually preclude installation of a

condensing furnace, or (b) the incremental installation cost (of a condensing furnace v. a 

non-condensing furnace) is prohibitive.

- An installer should be required to document eligibility for the waiver on a standardized 

form, to be subsequently submitted to DOE. Documentation should include: building 

characteristics driving excessive incremental installation cost; regulatory constraints; and 

project cost data. 

- Installers determining waiver eligibility should be required to have appropriate training 

and certification on the waiver process and criteria. 

- In order to ensure that the waiver policy is working as intended, DOE should periodically 

review experience with the waiver policy to determine whether any adjustment is 

appropriate. Any significant changes to the waiver policy should be promulgated through

an appropriate notice and comment process.
Exhibit 12.1   NSTAR Electric Company Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Year Ended December 31, 2010 (in thousands)   Net income from continuing operations$248,575Less: equity income from investees836Plus: distributed income of equity investees669Income taxes162,020Fixed charges (including securitization certificates)77,915Total$488,343Interest expense$71,511Interest component of rentals (estimated as one-third of rental expense)6,404Total$77,915Ratio of earnings to fixed charges6.27     Exhibit 12.2   NSTAR Electric Company Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements Year Ended December 31, 2010 (in thousands)    Net income from continuing operations (before preferred stock dividend)$248,575Less: equity income from investees836Plus: distributed income of equity investees669Income taxes162,020Fixed charges (including securitization certificates)77,915Total$488,343Interest expense$71,511Interest component of rentals (estimated as one-third of rental expense)6,404Subtotal77,915Preferred stock dividend requirements3,238Total$81,153Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividend requirements6.02
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
EXHIBIT 27 (F)

                       NONFINANCIAL STATEMENT DISCLOSURES
                                 REGULATION S-B

                                                                                
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the Company
10-QSB for the three  months  ended  February  28, 1998 and is  qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                   1,000
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                 FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                                    379
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           5,784
<ALLOWANCES>                                              125
<INVENTORY>                                             4,231
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       10,683
<PP&E>                                                 10,391
<DEPRECIATION>                                          7,654
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         16,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  11,152
<BONDS>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                  969
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                               (873)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           16,204
<SALES>                                                 3,543
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        3,543
<CGS>                                                   2,338
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             944
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           45
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        243
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            63
<INCOME-TAX>                                               25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        88
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                               88
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             .03
                             

</TABLE>
20 F Street N W · Suite 450 · Washington, DC · 2000 1 · (202) 216

- 5935 Interstate Natural Gas Association of America



### Stephen Page, Director Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Mail Drop C404

- 03

U.S. EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

May 15, 2014

Director Page;

The Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA) is a trade association of the interstate natural gas pipeline industry. INGAA member companies transport the vast majority of the natural gas consumed in the United States through over 185,000 miles of interstate natural gas pipelines.

On April 15, 2014, EPA released for external review five technical white papers on potentially significant sources of methane and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions in the oil and gas sector (EPA White Papers). The deadline for submitting a response currently is June 16, 2014. INGAA respectfully requests a 60 day extension of time

— to and including August 15, 2014

— within which to submit our comments and answers to the questions posed in the EPA White Papers.

Developing a response to the white paper q uestions will require significant discussion within the INGAA member companies and 60 days is simply is not enough time to provide thorough responses. The papers pose a number of interrelated questions that often will require a multi

- faceted response. Th oughtfully and thoroughly addressing these issues will require significant effort on the part of all stakeholders, often including industry

- wide assessments. For example, questions regarding cost implications and technical feasibility impacts will entail an integrated effort within the industry to provide a quality, validated, and

vetted answer.

Given these factors, INGAA respectfully request EPA grant an extension of at least 60 days for comments to be submitted on these very important papers. The reque sted extension will give all interested stakeholders the time needed to respond properly, and would result in a more complete and accurate record upon which to base future action. INGAA fully understand the sense of urgency surrounding the matters address ed in these papers. However, we believe that thoughtful, thorough and well

- founded responses will serve the interests of the public, the regulators and the operators better than less thorough but quicker responses. An extension of at least 60 days will e nable us to achieve that goal.

INGAA appreciates your prompt attention to this request and looks forward to your response. Please contact

me at 202

- 216

- 5935 or lbeal@ingaa.org if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely,



### Lisa Beal

Vice President

, Environment and Construction Policy

Interstate Natural Gas Association of America
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0003038

10-APR-2015

07:50 AM
# HRSGLB_UNS
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 8-K

                   CURRENT REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                           The SECURITIES ACT OF 1934

                          Date of Report: June 9, 1997

                         BOONTON ELECTRONICS CORPORATION

                            A New Jersey corporation
                   IRS Employer Identification No. 22-1543137

                   25 Eastmans Road, Parsippany, NJ 07054-0465
                                 (201) 386-9696


               Item 5.  OTHER EVENTS


               On  June  9,  1997,   O.E.M.  USA,  Inc.  (GEM),  a  wholly-owned
subsidiary of General de Mesure et de Maintenance  Electronique S.A. (GMME), did
not exercise its option to purchase an additional  443,700  shares of the common
stock  of  Boonton  Electronics  Corporation  (BEC),  as  provided  for  in  the
Subscription and Option Agreement dated October 21, 1996, by and between BEC and
GMME.  Although no extension has been provided to GEM and or GMME for the option
to  purchase  additional  shares of BEC common  stock,  discussions  between the
parties are expected to continue during BEC's Fourth Fiscal Quarter of 1997.

               EXHIBITS:       None


                                    SIGNATURE


               Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934, the Registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                               BOONTON ELECTRONICS CORPORATION


                               By /s/ JOHN E. TITTERTON
                                 ---------------------------------------
                                      John E. Titterton, Vice President Finance 
                                      Secretary/Treasurer

Dated: June 18, 1997

                                       37
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 80 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 80

Approving the request of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for a waiver 
        under section 1703E(f) of title 38, United States Code.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 11, 2019

Mr. David P. Roe of Tennessee submitted the following joint resolution; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Approving the request of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for a waiver 
        under section 1703E(f) of title 38, United States Code.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress approves the 
request for a waiver under section 1703E(f) of title 38, United States 
Code, as submitted by the Secretary on December 6, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.50


                            AMENDMENT NUMBER 7 TO THE

                AUTOMATIC VARIABLE ANNUITY REINSURANCE AGREEMENT
                         (REFERRED TO AS THE AGREEMENT)

                                     BETWEEN

                   WESTERN RESERVE LIFE ASSURANCE CO. OF OHIO
                             ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA
                         (REFERRED TO AS THE REINSURED)

                                       AND

                           GLOBAL PREFERRED RE LIMITED
                   (F/K/A WMA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED)
                                HAMILTON, BERMUDA
                         (REFERRED TO AS THE REINSURER)

                            Effective January 1, 2002

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Reinsurer shall:

         A.       Increase its quota share basis on all policies issued from
                  January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2001, reinsured under
                  this Agreement, from the current ten percent (10%) to fourteen
                  percent (14%).

         B.       Increase its quota share basis on all policies issued on or
                  after January 1, 2002, reinsured under this Agreement, from
                  the current ten percent (10%) to fourteen percent (14%).

         C.       Cease reinsuring Freedom Wealth Creator annuities sold after
                  December 31, 2001.

Except as expressed herein, all terms, covenants and provisions of this
Agreement, as amended, that are not in conflict with the provisions of this
Amendment Number 7 shall remain unaltered and in full force and effect.

In Witness Whereof, the Reinsured and the Reinsurer, by their respective
officers have executed this amendment in duplicate at the dates and places
indicated.


WESTERN RESERVE LIFE ASSURANCE             GLOBAL PREFERRED RE LIMITED
CO. OF OHIO

at St. Petersburg, Florida                 at Duluth, Georgia
   -----------------------------           ---------------------------------
on March 28, 2002                          on March 28, 2002

By: /s/ Larry Kirkland                     By: /s/ Edward McKernan
   -----------------------------           ----------------------------------
Title: Vice President/                     Title:  Chief Executive Officer/
       Managing Actuary                            President

By: /s/Stephanie J. Harder                 By:
    ----------------------------           ----------------------------------
Title:  Staff Actuary                      Title:
No. 03-14-00267-CV

In the Third Court of Appeals

Austin, Texas

DAISY WANDA GARCIA, APPELLANT

v.

THOMAS LEE BAUMGARTEN, APPELLEE

APPEAL FROM CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-12-002429

201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS 

HON. CHARLES RAMSEY PRESIDING

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

John L. Foster

Texas Bar No. 07289000

FOSTER RAMSEY

812 San Antonio Street

Suite 400

Austin, Texas 78701

512-476-4473

512-474-1606 (Fax)

jfoster@fosterramsey.com

Lead Counsel

Stephen Casey

Texas Bar No. 24065015

CASEY LAW OFFICE, P.C.

595 Round Rock West Drive

Suite 102

Round Rock, Texas 78681

Telephone: 512-257-1324

Fax: 512-853-4098

info@caseylawoffice.us

Counsel for Appellant 

Daisy Wanda Garcia

ACCEPTED

03-14-00267-CV

4890595

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/14/2015 8:52:21 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/14/2015 8:52:21 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Page 2 of 2

This notice hereby informs the Court of the appearance of undersigned 

counsel Stephen Casey for the purposes of the contemporaneously filed Emergency 

Motion to Abate. Attorney John L. Foster is still lead counsel for purposes of the 

appeal.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Stephen Casey 

John L. Foster

Texas Bar No. 07289000

FOSTER RAMSEY

812 San Antonio Street

Suite 400

Austin, Texas 78701

512-476-4473

512-474-1606 (Fax)

jfoster@fosterramsey.com

Lead Counsel

Stephen Casey

Texas Bar No. 24065015

CASEY LAW OFFICE, P.C.

595 Round Rock West Drive

Suite 102

Round Rock, Texas 78681

Telephone: 512-257-1324

Fax: 512-853-4098

stephen@caseylawoffice.us

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing notice was 

served upon counsel for Appellee on Tuesday, April 14, 2015, via electronic 

transmission: 

Nicholas Laurent, Counsel for Appellee

nlaurent@mcginnislaw.com

/s/ Stephen Casey
EXHIBIT 99.2

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<S>    <C>               <C>    <C>
The undersigned hereby certifies, in my capacity as an officer
of Boston Edison Company, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


  (i)  the enclosed Annual Report of Boston Edison Company on
       Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully
       complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


  (ii) the information contained in such Report fairly presents,
       in all material respects, the financial condition and
       results of operations of Boston Edison Company.


Dated:  March 27, 2003     By:   /s/ JAMES J. JUDGE
                                 James J. Judge
                                 Senior Vice President, Treasurer
                                   and Chief Financial Officer

</TABLE>
lnventoryExpertService 

A C1iviSI0J) O! thu Arm.Hit:illl ChCilliC~;;; ··-- -h--·~··~ ······· ---~--· ---··---~~· .. ·······- 'h ~;:-G3~H~:Gl1-4tl 3870 

Fax: 614·44/-3/4/ 

E ·mai!; •m~;wun;<!i car;.o o 

Wet>: www.C<1S.org/pcodvc:ts/ollll)f•C::ts-products/c;licm i•SOIViCI.'fJ/ 

CAS 

[] 

INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT 

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN. 

If this box is checked, CAS h<JS mt~dc c:o rn~ct ion (s) marked in red to your IE$ order. 

Pkilse nwke the same corrections to your PMN before submitting it to thP FPA. 

2540 OI~H1tangy Hiver HoacJ P.O. Box 3343 USA
12.12.2008 Official Journal of the European Union L 334/45 EN
L 334/46 Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2008 EN
12.12.2008 Official Journal of the European Union L 334/47 EN