alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Eric Troxell

Comment 2

I am writing to inquire why the USDA has chosen to drag their feet on making licenses available for those whose wish to farm industrial hemp? Is it true that there are numerous models to adopt implemented by states across this nation for your review of best practices? Is it true that Canada has had this type of agricultural commodity for at least 15 years? Is it true that hemp is legal to grow, has been descheduled and by dragging your feet you create an atmosphere of confusion as well as economic loss of opportunity for many people and communities? Is it true that taxpayers fund your salary and that you work for the taxpayer and not yourselves? Is it true that by taking tax money and not returning an equal value or service to the taxpayer that a theft has occurred? We don’t work for you, employers don’t wait for their employees to get their act together and fly right. It’s dishonest to imply that you don’t know how to proceed, it is unethical to hold up our ability to generate an income while you enjoy one at our expense. This plant grows with or without your input, it is a naturally occurring species on this planet. This is not foreign territory or unknown agriculture. There are many universities who have already done the work for you. Authorize our states to issue licenses so we can get on with our lives normally. You’ve had a hundred years of prohibition to distort facts, illegitimate useful crops, cripple industries and mop the floor with us peasants for the benefit of your moneyed influencers. Enough! Do what is right, what has been made legal, do your damn job! I ordinarily don’t lose my patience but the bureaucratic nonsense is so thick it’s choking us. It’s unnecessary and the only thing standing in the way of a good thing is you. Government was put in place to encourage the welfare of the people it serves not to stifle them. Time is long past for the ignorance of the days of reefer madness to die. Arbitrary is not a scientific excuse.
ACTIO N 

# n ^ S I 0-110120-05 8 Pettiford , Mari e (OST ) CONTRO Lr-J O 

## From : Sent : To : Subject : Tamar a Eastaug h [tamaramill@hotmail.com ] Wednesday , January19 , 201 1 5:1 4 P M LaHood , Ray(OST ) Southeas tAlask a Essentia l Ai rServic e T 3 January19 , 201 1 Th e Honorabl e RayLaHoo d Secretary U.S . Departmen to fTransportatio n _ 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S.E . < ^ c/: ; Washington , D.C . 2059 0 ^ Re : Continuatio n o fAlask a Airlines ' Essentia l Ai rServic e a tCordova . Gustavus . Petersburg . Wranoell . an d Yakutat . Alaska , Docke t OST-1998-489 9 Dea rSecretar yLaHood , Thi s lette ri s t o expres s stron g supportfo rth e selectio n o fAlaska Airline s t o continu e t o provid e essentia l ai rservic e t o ou rcommunity . Alaska' s curren t patter n o fservic e - usin g je taircraf t- meet s crucia l need s tha t woul d b e difficult , i fno t impossible , t o mee t wit h an y othe rtyp e o fservic e o raircraf t type : Alaska' s servic e connect s Southeas tAlask a passenger s t o on e o rmor e majo rcommunitie s o finterest , wit h single-plan e servic e t o Anchorage , Juneau , Ketchika n o rSeattle . Fro m thes e hubs , ou rcommunit yca n acces s th e airline' s extensiv e rout e syste m an d benefi t from it s marketin g relationship s wit h othe rcarriers . Th e 737-40 0 combinatio n ("combi" ) passenge ran d carg o aircraft , whic h Alask a Airlines propose s t o continu e usin g o n thi s route , provide s freight , mai l an d carg o capacit ytha t a non-je t carrie rsimpl ycanno t provide . Further , th e 737-40 0 comb i aircraf ti s equippe d wit h Require d Navigatio n Performanc e Technolog yprecisio n technology , whic h enable s th e airtin e t o reliabl yacces s th e airportdurin g inclemen tweather , thu s reducin g diversion s an d cancellation s and , i n tum , enablin g peopl e an d product s t o dependabl yreac h th e community . I n sum , Alaska' s je t servic e i s critica l t o th e economi cwel l bein g o fou r community . Livin g o n a n islan d w e alread yfee l trappe d becaus e w e ar e unable t o driv e t o othe rcities . Alask a Airtine s i s on e o fou ronl y ways of fth e islan d i n a n emergenc ysituatio n wher e someon e need s t o ge t t o a bigge rhospita l o ra famil ymemt>e ri s ill . Pleas e mak e sur e thi s rout e t o Southeas t Alask a continues . Sincerely , Tamar a Eastaug h P C Bo x72 2 Wrangell , Alask a 9992 9 907874299 9
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-74 Specification

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 July 17, 2019

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 1 of 2 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Creekstone Farms Premium International Black Angus Beef Program

G-74 Specification

1 REQUIREMENTS

Beef carcasses certified under this specification shall meet the following requirements: 

a. Phenotypic or genotypic requirements of the American Angus Association’s (AAA) Live

Animal Specification;

b. Are derived from livestock that are USDA, AMS Non-Hormone Treated Cattle (NHTC)

program;

c. Classed as Steer or Heifer carcasses only1;

d. U.S. Prime, Choice, or Select and have a minimum marbling score of Slight 01

; 

e. Less than 30 months of age with lean color, texture, and firmness, meeting the requirements for

A maturity in the U.S. grade it qualifies for1;

f. Medium or fine marbling texture1, 2

; 

g. Moderately thick or thicker muscling and tend to be at least moderately wide and thick in

relation to their length3

;

h. No hump exceeding 2 inches in height 4; 

and

i. Practically free (not detracting from visual quality) of capillary rupture in the ribeye muscle.

2 CERTIFICATION

Carcasses to be examined for compliance with this specification shall be clearly identified and 

presented to an AMS grader for certification. Certification procedures for identification, the removal 

of preliminary identification marks (or other methods of control) from non-qualifying carcasses, and 

control of certified carcasses shall be in accordance with established Quality Assessment Division 

(QAD) procedures. 

1 Determined in accordance with the “Official United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef.” 2 Evaluated using the USDA-AMS-LS-SB-02 Marbling Texture card (included in the Official USDA Marbling Photographs.) 3 Muscle thickness is evaluated by averaging the thickness of the various parts, considering not only the proportion of each part of the 

carcass but also the general value of each part. Superior muscle thickness implies a high proportion of meat to bone and a high 

proportion of the weight of the carcass in the more valuable parts.

4 Measured from a line formed by the extension of the top line (including the fat) and measuring the lean muscle (excluding the fat) 

perpendicular to that line in the center of the hump. 
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-74 Specification 

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 July 17, 2019

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 2 of 2 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

3 LABELING

Labeling of products derived from certified carcasses must follow Food Safety and Inspection Service 

regulations and policy guidelines and QAD procedures. 

4 FEES

The costs of all grading and certification services performed by an AMS grader involving 

examinations, supervision, official documentation, and related services shall be borne by the person, 

group, or plant requesting the service. 

___________________________________ 

Chad Nelson, National Meat Supervisor

Quality Assessment Division

Livestock & Poultry Program
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 20, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 92939-92940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-30511]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Forty Sixth RTCA SC-224 Plenary

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Forty Sixth RTCA SC-224 Plenary.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of Forty Sixth RTCA SC-224 Plenary.

DATES: The meeting will be held February 02, 2017 10:00 a.m.-01:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at: RTCA Headquarters, 1150 18th 
Street NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Karan Hofmann at khofmann@rtca.org or 
202-330-0680, or The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street, NW., Suite 
910, Washington, DC, 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-9339, fax at 
(202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of the Forty Sixth RTCA SC-224 Plenary. The 
agenda will include the following:

Thursday, February 2, 2017-10:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m.

1. Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks
2. Review/Approve Previous Meeting Summary
3. Report on TSA participation
4. Report on the New Guidelines and other Safe Skies Reports
5. Review of DO-230H Sections
6. Terms of Reference Revisions
7. Action Items for Next Meeting
8. Time and Place of Next Meeting
9. Any Other Business
10. Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

[[Page 92940]]

    Issued in Washington, DC on December 14, 2016.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management & Program Analyst, Partnership Contracts Branch, ANG-A17, 
NextGen, Procurement Services Division, Federal Aviation 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-30511 Filed 12-19-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13

                    AMENDMENTS TO THE 1987 STOCK OPTION PLAN
                                  (THE "PLAN")


On September 4, 1996, the Company's Board of Directors approved to amend the
Plan to provide for the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion, to grant
Optionees the ability to transfer Options previously granted or to be granted to
(i) immediate family members (such as children, grandchildren or spouse); (ii)
trusts for the benefit of the Optionee's immediate family members; and (iii)
partnerships in which immediate family members are the only partners; provided,
however, that no consideration be paid for such transfer of the Option.

On December 3, 1996, the Company's Board of Directors approved to amend Section
7 of the Plan to read as follows:

         "7. OPTION PRICE. The price at which shares of Stock may be purchased
         pursuant to an Option shall be not less than the fair market value of
         the shares of Stock on the date the Option is granted, and the
         Committee in its discretion may provide that the price at which shares
         may be so purchased shall be more than such fair market value. The
         "fair market value" of the Stock shall be the closing selling price of
         the Stock as reported in The Wall Street Journal for the last trading
         day before the date as of which such fair market value is to be
         determined."

On December 2, 1997, the Company's Board of Directors approved to amend the Plan
to provide for the Company to buy back shares of Stock, as defined in the Plan,
resulting from stock option exercises by any officer of the Company, and the
Applicable Funds, as defined in the Plan will include the delivery of
instructions to retain the exercise price from the proceeds of the sale of the
share of Stock.

On May 4, 1998, the Company's Board of Directors approved to amend the Plan to
provide for the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion, to establish an
extended exercisable period upon termination of employment from thirty days to
up to six months for any future optionees, and further that all outstanding
stock options shall be deemed fully vested immediately upon a Change of Control.
For all purposes of the Plan, a Change of Control shall be deemed to have
occurred if, with or without the approval of the Board of Directors of the
Company, any of the following events shall occur (i) more than 25% of the voting
power of the Company's outstanding securities entitled to vote in elections of
directors shall be acquired by any person (as such term is used in Sections
13(d) and 14(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934) except with respect
to any Optionee who is included in any such person; or (ii) as the result of a
tender offer, merger, consolidation, sale of assets or contested election, or
any combination of such transactions, the persons who were directors of the
Company immediately before the transaction shall cease to constitute a majority
of the Board of Directors of the Company or of any successor to the Company.
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Brian D. Niebur, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this amended annual report on form 10-K/A for the year ended December31, 2003 of Entrx Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: April 28, 2004 /s/ Brian D. Niebur  By: Brian D. Niebur Chief Financial Officer
SUSANA MARTINEZ Governor JOHN A. SANCHEZ Lieutenant Governor

November 7, 2012

Mr. Ron Curry Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 6 

### State of New Mexico ENVIRONMENTDEPARTMENT 

### Office of theSecretary
Harold Runnels Building 1190 Saint Francis Drive, PO Box 5469 Santa Fe, NM 87502-5469 Telephone (505) 827-2855 Fax (505) 827-2836 www.nmenv.state.nm.us

1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 RE: Public Notice for Minor Source New Source Review
Dear Mr. Curry: DAVE MARTIN Secretary BUTCH TONGATE Deputy Secretary



# ,..**~** 

### :;; N 

### :z: '"tl 0 

### ,.,., <: 

# .,.,x



# ....;::; U1**o~**

r<r. -o :::0<
.. n :X 

### ,..., 

## " f:" 

# _, 0 :z: 0

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)- Region VI is currently reviewing New Mexico's public notice requirements under Section 206 of20.2.72 New Mexico Administrative Code (NMAC)- 

### Construction Permits. In orderto clarify compliance with40 CFR 51.161 regarding public notice for Minor Source New Source Review, the NewMexico Environment Department's Air Quality Bureau will provide notification on our website ofall second thirty (30) day public comment periods provided for under Paragraph B ofSection 206 of20.2.72 NMAC. We also committo update Section 206 the next time we propose revisions to 20.2.72 NMAC. Ifyouhave any other questions regarding this issue, please contact Richard Goodyear, Air Quality Bureau Chief, at 505-476-4305 orvia email at richard.goodyear@state.nm.us. Sincerely,

# &CC-trZ~~ Dave Martin Cabinet Secretary NewMexico Environment Department

cc: JeffRobinson, EPA Region 6 Mary Rose, Acting Division Director, NMED

- EPD Richard Goodyear, Air Quality Bureau Chief 

### :::0 

# rn (") 

## m



# - < m 0
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-64 Specification

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 July 17, 2019

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 1 of 2 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Signature Double R Northwest Brand Beef Program

G-64 Specification

1 REQUIREMENTS

Beef carcasses certified under this specification shall meet the following requirements: 

a. Classed as Steer or Heifer carcasses only1;

b. U.S. Prime or Choice and have a minimum marbling score of Moderate 01; 

c. Less than 30 months of age with lean color, texture, and firmness, meeting the requirements for

A maturity in the U.S. grade it qualifies for1;

d. Medium or fine marbling texture1, 2; 

e. Moderately thick or thicker muscling and tend to be at least moderately wide and thick in

relation to their length3;

f. No hump exceeding 2 inches in height 4; 

g. Practically free (not detracting from visual quality) of capillary rupture in the ribeye muscle;

and

h. Free of “dark cutting” characteristics.

2 CERTIFICATION

Carcasses to be examined for compliance with this specification shall be clearly identified and 

presented to an AMS grader for certification. Certification procedures for identification, the removal 

of preliminary identification marks (or other methods of control) from non-qualifying carcasses, and 

control of certified carcasses shall be in accordance with established Quality Assessment Division 

(QAD) procedures. 

3 LABELING

Labeling of products derived from certified carcasses must follow Food Safety and Inspection Service 

regulations and policy guidelines and QAD procedures. 

1 Determined in accordance with the “Official United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef.” 2 Evaluated using the USDA-AMS-LS-SB-02 Marbling Texture card (included in the Official USDA Marbling Photographs.) 3 Muscle thickness is evaluated by averaging the thickness of the various parts, considering not only the proportion of each part of the 

carcass but also the general value of each part. Superior muscle thickness implies a high proportion of meat to bone and a high 

proportion of the weight of the carcass in the more valuable parts.

4 Measured from a line formed by the extension of the top line (including the fat) and measuring the lean muscle (excluding the fat) 

perpendicular to that line in the center of the hump.
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-64 Specification 

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 July 17, 2019

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 2 of 2 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

4 FEES

The costs of all grading and certification services performed by an AMS grader involving 

examinations, supervision, official documentation, and related services shall be borne by the person, 

group, or plant requesting the service. 

___________________________________ 

Chad Nelson, National Meat Supervisor

Quality Assessment Division

Livestock & Poultry Program
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 68 (Monday, April 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8475]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7842]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Edouard Vuillard: A Painter and His Muses, 1890-
1940''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Edouard Vuillard: A Painter and His Muses, 
1890-1940,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
The Jewish Museum, New York, New York from on or about May 4, 2012, 
until on or about September 23, 2012, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

     Dated: April 3, 2012.
 J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-8475 Filed 4-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```