alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Friday, April 10, 2015

No. 04-14-00643-CR

Lonnie PRICE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR9144

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the brief is GRANTED. Time is 

extended to April 17, 2015. No further extensions will be granted.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23293-23294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9429]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, May 2, 2012, at 11 a.m.

PLACE: Commission Hearing Room, 901 New York Avenue NW., Suite 200, 
Washington, DC 20268-0001.

STATUS: Part of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of 
the meeting will be closed to the public. The open session will be 
audiocast. The

[[Page 23294]]

audiocast may be accessed via the Commission's Web site at http://www.prc.gov. A period for public comment will be offered following 
consideration of the last numbered item in the open session.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The agenda for the Commission's May 2, 2012 
meeting includes the items identified below.

PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC:
    1. Report on legislative activities.
    2. Report on communications with the public.
    3. Report on status of Commission dockets.
    4. Report from the Office of the Secretary and Administration.
    5. Report from the Office of Accountability and Compliance.
    6. Report on international activities.
    7. Presentation on the GSA Mail Management program. Chairman's 
public comment period.

PORTION CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC:
    8. Discussion of pending litigation.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Stephen L. Sharfman, General 
Counsel, Postal Regulatory Commission, 901 New York Avenue NW., Suite 
200, Washington, DC 20268-0001, at 202-789-6820 (for agenda-related 
inquiries) and Shoshana M. Grove, Secretary of the Commission, at 202-
789-6800 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f2c37302c373e313e71382d30293a1f2f2d3c71383029"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="66150e09150e0708074801140910032616140548010910">[email protected]</span></a> (for inquiries related to meeting 
location, access for handicapped or disabled persons, the audiocast, or 
similar matters).

    Dated: April 16, 2012.

    By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9429 Filed 4-16-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE 

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS 

OF TEXAS 

RODNEY CARNELL MAYS § 

§ 

VS. § CASE NO. 01-13-00805-CR

§ 

THE STATE OF TEXAS § 

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE APPELLATE 

BRIEF 

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT: 

NOW COMES, RODNEY CARNELL MAYS, appellant in the above-styled 

and numbered cause, by and through his attorney of record, Daucie Schindler, and 

respectfully moves the Court for an extension of time within which to file the 

appellate brief, and for cause would show the Court as follows: 

I.

Mr. Mays was charged with the misdemeanor offense of assault on a family 

member. On September 3, 2013, Mr. Mays entered a plea of not guilty and proceeded 

to trial. The judge found Mr. Mays guilty as charged. Mr. Mays’ punishment was 

assessed by agreement at fifty-six (56) days in the Harris County jail. 

II.

Mr. Mays filed timely notice of appeal. Undersigned counsel, of The Harris 

County Public Defender’s Office was appointed to represent Mr. Mays on October 3, 

ACCEPTED

01-13-00805-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/10/2015 9:44:47 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/10/2015 9:44:47 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
2014. 

III.

The appellate brief is due to be filed with the Court on or before April 10, 

2015. One previous extension has been requested. 

IV.

Undersigned counsel has been working simultaneously on appeal in State v. 

Briones, State v. Snavely, State v. Tavarez, State v. Fletcher, State v. Marks, State v. 

Umanzor, and State v. Phillips. Counsel is diligently working on the brief in this case, 

but requests additional time having only just recognized a meritorious issue and 

needing to confer with the client.

V.

This request is made not to delay the proceedings, but to ensure that Mr. Mays

is adequately represented.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Mr. Mays respectfully prays that this 

motion be granted and that the Court permits an extension of time until May 11,

2015, to file the appellate brief.

Respectfully submitted,

ALEXANDER BUNIN

Chief Public Defender

Harris County Texas

/s/ Daucie Schindler

DAUCIE SCHINDLER

Assistant Public Defender 

Harris County Texas 

1201 Franklin, 13th Floor

Houston Texas 77002

(713) 368-0016

(713) 368-9278 (Fax)

Daucie.Schindler@pdo.hctx.net

Attorney for Appellant,

RODNEY CARNELL MAYS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Appellant’s 

Motion to Extend Time within Which to File Appellate Brief was e-mailed to the 

Appellate Division of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office on this 10th day of 

April, 2015.

/s/ Daucie Schindler

DAUCIE SCHINDLER
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 14

- 00052

- CR

DONTA TREMAINE BROWN ING , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
Appeal from the 240th District Court of Fort Bend County

.

(Tr. Ct. No. 11

- DCR

- 058541 ).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on December 11, 2013. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no r eversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered February 26, 2015.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown.
391 A.2d 685

#### Commonwealth v. Jackson, Appellant.

Submitted March 13,1978.

H. Stanley Rebert, Public Defender, for appellant; John C. Uhler, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Order affirmed.
DRAFT 2023-03-31

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL

DC: 8482569v4

May 8, 2023

Mr. Bruce Summers

Administrator

Agricultural Marketing Service

U.S. Department of Agriculture

1400 Independence Avenue, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20250

Dear Administrator Summers:

I am responding to your April 28, 2023 letter, concerning the March 30, 2023, request of the International 

Dairy Foods Association (IDFA), as supplemented by letter dated April 3, 2023, that the U.S. Department 

of Agriculture (USDA) hold a hearing to amend the 11 Federal Milk Marketing Orders (FMMO). The 

IDFA proposal seeks the amendment of the manufacturing (make) allowances contained in the Class III 

and IV price formulas, using the most recently available industry cost data. 

IDFA’s petition cited cost study numbers calculated by the Dairy Institute of California, as well as a cost 

study currently being updated, but not yet completed, by Dr. Mark Stephenson. In your April 28, 2023 

letter, you indicated that USDA needs additional information regarding the specific make allowance 

values that IDFA is requesting that the Secretary consider for adoption.

IDFA is writing to confirm that it will comply fully with your request. Dr. Stephenson is nearing the 

completion of his updated cost study, which will provide IDFA with the data sets necessary for IDFA to 

provide the requested “specific make allowance values” that IDFA is asking the Secretary to consider for 

adoption. Barring any currently unforeseeable developments, IDFA will provide USDA with the 

requested information this month. 

As indicated in our April 3, 2023 letter, USDA historically has issued a public notice inviting others to 

submit proposals as well, and nothing in IDFA’s proposal suggests a different approach be adopted here. 

We understand USDA will evaluate whether any proposals submitted meet its stated criteria for a hearing 

proposal, and if so, how best to organize the proceedings.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. 

Sincerely,

Mike Brown

Chief Economist

International Dairy Foods Association

cc: Dana H. Coale, Deputy Administrator, Dairy Programs, AMS/USDA

Erin Taylor, Director, Order Formulation and Enforcement Division, USDA/AMS/Dairy
# QBL 03-15-2024
<PAGE>
Exhibit 11

          Statement of computation of earnings per share.
     167
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Statements re: Computation of Earnings Per Share
Brenton Banks, Inc.
<CAPTION>
December 31,                            1997           1996           1995

<S>                             <C>            <C>            <C>

Basic EPS Computation
   Numerator:
     Net income                 $ 18,010,107   $ 14,015,430   $ 10,407,354

   Denominator:
     Average common shares
       outstanding                17,504,716     18,091,614     18,569,224

   Basic EPS                    $       1.03   $       0.78   $       0.56

Diluted EPS Computation
   Numerator:
     Net income                 $ 18,010,107   $ 14,015,430   $ 10,407,354

   Denominator:
     Average common shares
       outstanding                17,504,716     18,091,614     18,569,224
     Average stock options           283,912        160,792        140,501
     Average long-term stock
       compensation plan             140,154        195,527        192,854
                                  17,928,782     18,447,933     18,902,579

   Diluted EPS                  $       1.01   $       0.76   $       0.55
<FN>
Note:  Amounts are restated for the 2-for-1 stock split effective February
1998 and the 10% common stock dividends effective in 1997 and 1996.
</TABLE>
     168
Marketing and Regulatory Programs – Agricultural Marketing Service – Specialty Crops Program – Specialty Crops Inspection Division 1 of 1

 Inspection Aid No. 34

Frozen Whole Kernel Corn – Guide for Scoring Defects July 2016

Kind of Defects

Maximum Defects Permissible in Score

(For each 10 ounces net weight – see Table II §52.38)

A B1 C1

Score 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28

Cob 2(Cubic Centimeters) 0 0.1 cc 0.1 cc 0.2 cc 0.2 cc 0.3 cc 0.3 cc 0.4 cc 0.5 cc 0.6 cc 0.6 cc 0.7 cc 0.7 cc

Husk (Square Inch) 0 1/16 2/16 3/16 4/16 5/16 6/16 7/16 8/16 9/16 10/16 11/16 12/16

Silk (Measure only pieces over 1⁄2” 

long) 2 in 4 in 6 in 8 in 10 in 12 in 14 in 17 in 20 in 32 in 44 in 57 in 70 in

Pulled Kernels 3

 Broad Grain 4 0 1 1 2 3 4 4 5 5 6 7 8 8

 Narrow Grain 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 9 10 10

Damaged Kernels

Insignificant (May affect appearance 

or eating quality) Not More Than Slightly Not Materially Not Seriously

Damaged and Seriously Damaged

 Broad Grain 4 0 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 6 7 8 10 12

 Narrow Grain 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 9 9 10 12

Including Including Including

Seriously Damaged

 Broad Grain 4 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5

 Narrow Grain 5 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5

Above defects plus ragged kernels, 

loose skins, and other defects may 

affect appearance or eating quality

Not More Than Slightly Not Materially Not Seriously

 

 

1

Limiting Rule

2

See method outlined in Food and Drug Standard of Quality for Canned Corn - 21 CFR 155.130.

3

See Photo Guide illustrating Pulled Kernels and Cut Kernels in Canned and Frozen Whole Kernel Corn, and Inspectors’ Instructions for classifying Pulled Kernels and Cut Kernels in 

 Canned and Frozen Whole Kernel Corn.

4 Broad Grain Corn is defined to mean that the aggregate diameter of 20 representative kernels placed side by side in a manner illustrated by the diagram shown above which 

 measures 5 inches or more.

5Narrow Grain Corn is defined to mean that the aggregate diameter of 20 representative kernels placed side by side in a manner illustrated by the diagram shown above which 

 measures less than 5 inches.
Motion Granted; Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 9, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00349-CR

THOMAS TRANH PHAM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1358958

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury convicted appellant of aggravated assault of a family member with a 

deadly weapon. On April 4, 2014, pursuant to an agreement with the State on 

punishment, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for eight years in 

the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and assessed 

a $500 fine. The trial court suspended the sentence and placed appellant on 

community supervision for eight years. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.
2

Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal 

is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional 

evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to 

be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised 

of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford 

v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Counsel has complied with 

the Anders procedures set out in Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2014). Appellant was advised of the deadline to file any pro se 

response to counsel’s brief. As of this date, more than sixty days have passed since 

the deadline and no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in 

the record. We need not address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief 

or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for 

review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby.

Do Not Publish—Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
This is Drew Rigby with the Utah Dept of Ag. I oversee both the industrial hemp and medical cannabis programs here in Utah. 

I understand that we only have three min., but we wanted to share a little bit about Utah's CBD and Hemp product registration program. 

Any hemp product or any product for sale Utah that contains any hemp or CBD derivative needs to be registered with the state of Utah. The intent of product registration is to set a standard that consumers can trust in. We do this by requiring COAs and labeling be submitted for every single sku and product. We then go through and make sure the analysis matches labels for any claims of ingredients etc.

We would like to just briefly mention this as a suggestion for all product, because obviously there is a huge problem with this nationwide.
COURT REPORTER’S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

THIS RECORD IS DUE ON 4-10-2015

THIS RECORD WAS ORIGINALLY DUE : 3-11-2015

I AM REQUESTING 30 DAYS

THIS RECORD IS APPROXIMATELY 1500 PAGES LONG

IS THIS APPEAL ACCELERATED? ___YES ___NO

4-10-2015

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS CAUSE NO. : 12-15-00009-CR

STYLE OF CASE: STATE OF TEXAS V. JOE LYNN PITTMAN

TRIAL COURT 114TH DISTRICT COURT

TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. 114-1053-14 

I am responsible for preparing a record in this appeal, but am unable to file the record by the

original due date for the following reason(s): 

My duties listed below have precluded me from working on this record:

STATE OF TEXAS V. DARRELL BELL 1,000 pages

STATE OF TEXAS V. QANDREW SHELTON 857 pages

STATE OF TEXAS V. OSCAR PERKINS 797 pages

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 4/10/2015 1:09:36 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
In compliance with TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(e), I certify that a copy of this notice has been served on

counsel for all parties to the trial court’s judgment or order being appealed. I further certify by

my signature below that the information contained in this notice is true and within my personal

knowledge.

 4-10-2014 Cassie Condrey 

Date Signature

______________________________ Cassie Condrey 

Office Phone Number Printed Name

cassiecondreycsr@gmail.com 114th Official Court Reporter

E-mail address (if available) Official Title
### S-1000 PRE-FLIGHT CHECKLIST

Item Checks Notes Flight Area Check with Google Maps Communication Radios Operational (if needed) Obstacles Clear Wind Speed / Direction Check Perimeter (!00m) Clear Antennas (5) Check direction Ground Control Station Load flight plan (if needed) Field Monitor On Camera Lens cap off / lens clean SD Card Installed with available space Camera Power On - battery level check Verify Camera Mode Install Camera Check Center of Gravity Check Level Copter Check nose direction - course lock Flight Transmitter Switches Switches and throttle down Flight Transmitter On Model Selection S-1000 Flight Transmitter Voltage > 6.0v Camera Transmitter Switches HDMI - standby / FPV - free Camera Transmitter On Camera Transmitter Voltage > 6.0v S-1000 Power On - black lead first GPS Calibration 1st Flight Toggle GPS switch 8-10 times Horizontal Calibration LED - Solid Blue Rotate 360 degrees nose ahead Vertical Calibration LED - Solid GreenRotate 360 degrees nose down Cycle S-1000 Battery Check nose direction - course lock Establish GPS Acquisition No Red Flashes > 7 Satellite acquisition Attitude Mode Indication Flash Amber Throttle down - 2 / Centered - 1 GPS Mode Indication Flash Purple Throttle down - 2 / Centered - 1 Course Lock Indication Flash Green Throttle down - 2 / Centered - 1 Camera Transmitter HDMI Switch On

1Camera Transmitter Free Style Switch Free Camera Operation Verify Shutter check / video check Verify Data Link Roll S-1000 check on-screen indicators Ground Control Station Load flight plan (if needed) Verify Altitude Approximately 0m Confirm GPS Link No Red Flashes > 7 Satellite acquisition on field monitor Emergency Landing Area Check Flight Transmitter Timer Start Item Checks Notes

2
<PAGE>

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                                                    Exhibit 12.1



                             Boston Edison Company
               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                         Year ended December 31, 1999
                                (in thousands)



Net income from continuing operations                  $160,314

Income taxes                                             68,564

Fixed charges                                           111,157
                                                       --------

  Total                                                $340,035
                                                       ========

Interest expense                                       $ 97,757
Interest component of rentals                            13,400
                                                       --------

  Total                                                $111,157
                                                       ========


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                         3.06
                                                           ====

                                      48
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23711]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9564]



[[Page 23711]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP12-600-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Letter Agreement Update Filing to be effective 5/11/
2012.
    Filed Date: 4/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120410-5092.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/23/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-601-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: 04/10/12 Negotiated Rates--Freepoint Commodities LLC 
(RTS) to be effective 4/10/2012.
    Filed Date: 4/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120410-5128.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/23/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-602-000.
    Applicants: Horizon Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Removal of Expired Agreement--Ameren to be effective 
5/11/2012.
    Filed Date: 4/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120410-5142.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/23/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-603-000.
    Applicants: Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership.
    Description: Update Pricing Penalties and FSA to be effective 5/14/
2012.
    Filed Date: 4/11/12.
    Accession Number: 20120411-5233.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/23/12.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP12-586-001.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Amendment to filing in Docket No. RP12-586 to be 
effective 4/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 4/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120410-5073.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/23/12.

    Any person desiring to protest in any of the above proceedings must 
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 
CFR 385.211) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment 
date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, and service can be found at: 
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other 
information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-
8659.

    Dated: April 12, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9564 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P