alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-29 Specification

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 July 8, 2019

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 1 of 2

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

High River Angus Exclusive 

G-29 Specification

1 REQUIREMENTS

Beef carcasses certified under this specification shall meet the following requirements:

a. Phenotypic or genotypic requirements of the American Angus Association’s (AAA) Live 

Animal Specification;

b. Classed as Steer or Heifer carcasses only1;

c. U.S. Prime or Choice and have a minimum marbling score of Modest 01;

d. Less than 30 months of age with lean color, texture, and firmness, meeting the requirements for 

A maturity in the U.S. grade it qualifies for1;

e. Medium or fine marbling texture1,2;

f. Moderately thick or thicker muscling and tend to be at least moderately wide and thick in 

relation to their length3;

g. No hump exceeding 2 inches in height4;

h. Practically free (not detracting from visual quality) of capillary rupture in the ribeye muscle; 

and

i. Free of “dark cutting” characteristics.

2 CERTIFICATION

Carcasses to be examined for compliance with this specification shall be clearly identified and 

presented to an AMS grader for certification. Certification procedures for identification, the removal 

of preliminary identification marks (or other methods of control) from non-qualifying carcasses, and 

control of certified carcasses shall be in accordance with established Quality Assessment Division 

(QAD) procedures.

3 LABELING

Labeling of products derived from certified carcasses must follow Food Safety and Inspection Service 

regulations and policy guidelines and QAD procedures.

 1 Determined in accordance with the “Official United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef.” 2 Evaluated using the USDA-AMS-LS-SB-02 Marbling Texture card (included in the Official USDA Marbling Photographs.) 3 Muscle thickness is evaluated by averaging the thickness of the various parts, considering not only the proportion of each part of the 

carcass but also the general value of each part. Superior muscle thickness implies a high proportion of meat to bone and a high 

proportion of the weight of the carcass in the more valuable parts.

4 Measured from a line formed by the extension of the top line (including the fat) and measuring the lean muscle (excluding the fat) 

perpendicular to that line in the center of the hump.
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-29 Specification

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 July 8, 2019

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 2 of 2

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

4 FEES

The costs of all grading and certification services performed by an AMS grader involving 

examinations, supervision, official documentation, and related services shall be borne by the person, 

group, or plant requesting the service.

___________________________________

Chad Nelson, National Meat Supervisor

Quality Assessment Division

Livestock & Poultry Program
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [CERCLA-04-2012-3770, FRL-9663-8]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice of settlement.

# SUMMARY:

Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States Environmental Protection Agency has entered into a settlement for reimbursement of past response costs concerning the American Drum and Pallet Superfund Site located in Memphis, Shelby County, Tennessee for publication.

      ( print page 24201)    

# DATES:

The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until May 23, 2012. The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

# ADDRESSES:

Copies of the settlement are available from Ms. Paula V. Painter. Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. CERCLA-04-2012-3770 or Site name American Drum & Pallet Superfund Site by one of the following methods:
      -  www.epa.gov/​region4/​superfund/​programs/​enforcement/​enforcement.htm1 .                    
      -  Email: Painter.Paula@epa.gov .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

Dated: April 9, 2012.

Anita L. Davis,

Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Superfund Division.

[FR Doc. 2012-9696 Filed 4-20-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Hello,

Thank you for trying to connect with the industry and community on this topic. I believe:

1. RAISE THE MAX THC LIMITS on type III cultivars. Chemotypical variance is too high across the multitude of growing locations, styles, and media. It is also just continuing antiquated drug war era ignorance around the plant and its cultivators.

2.we need to support those entities doing breeding programs that can supply large scale farms with feminized seed for their prospective uses to avoid pollen drift throughout the country. 

3. Microbial testing MUST ACCOUNT FOR BENEFICIAL MICROBES MANY REGENERATIVE FARMERS USE!!!!

4. WE NEED A NATIONAL TRACKING SYSTEM FOR PEST MANAGEMENT. As states come online folks are ignorantly mailing/trading cutting all around the country and spreading pests at a rapid rate. 

This plant in all its types is beneficial to the human race and should be treated like any other herb. By heavily regulating it we are choking off an extremely valuable resource for our communities.

Thank you,

Aidan Syms
Order entered April 11, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 12 - 01653 - CV THE CITY OF PLANO, Appellant V. THE POE LIVING TRUST , MARCUS POE TRUSTEE , Appellee On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court Collin Co unty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296 - 04259 - 2011 

### O RDER The Court has before it appellant’s April 9, 2013 motion to extend time to file its reply brief. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that any reply brief be filed by April 18, 2013.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
# C_2004111EN.01000802.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3385 — CARGILL/BCA)

(2004/C 111/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 1 April 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (see list on the last page), |
| --- | --- |

—

as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (see list on the last page),

| — | in electronic form in the 'CEN' version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3385. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the 'CEN' version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3385. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law.

For more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

| EUR-OP, |
| --- |
| Information, Marketing and Public Relations, |
| 2, rue Mercier, |
| L-2985 Luxembourg. |
| Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09. |

EUR-OP,

Information, Marketing and Public Relations,

2, rue Mercier,

L-2985 Luxembourg.

Tel. (352) 29 29 427 18, fax (352) 29 29 427 09.

---
08/31/201 1 14:34 FAX 2021935142 FAA - DMS @|001/003 

iJErV\RTMENT Of 

^IHNOPORTATIO N 

••'••GKET OPERATIONS 

Before the U.S. Department of Transportation 

Federal Aviation Administration /[jji /.['G J J p 3 3 3 

In the matter of ) 

) Docket No. CPlOSOOOll 

M & R HELICOPTER "l FAA Case No. 2009SO950434 

Judge Richard C. Goodwin 

COMPLAINANT'S RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO COMPEL 

DISCOVERY 4 

Respondent asks the Chief Administrative Law Judge to compel Complainant to 

provide discovery responsei;. There is no basis tor this motion. 

On August 9, 2011, Respondent filed Respondent's Reply to Complainant's 

Motion to Compel Discovery. Respondent's discovery requests appear at paragraph 13 of 

that reply. On August 25, 2011, Complainant responded to those discovery requests in 

Complainartt's Ri::sponsc lo Respondent's Discovery Request. Respondent's requests in 

Respondent's Motion to Compel Discovery 4 have already been responded lo in 

Complainant's Response to Respondent's Discovery Request served on August 25, 2011. 

WHEREFORE, Complainant respectfully requests that the Administrative LawJudge deny Respondent's Motion to Compel Discovery 4. 

[Si^naiure block appear.'; on next page] 
08/31/2011 14:35 FAX 2024935142 FAA ^ OMS 12002/003 

Rcspecifijlly submitted, 

Peter Lynch 

Assistant ChiefCounsel 

for Enforcement 

Charles Raley^ Attorney 

Enforcement Division. AGC-300 

Otlice of the ChiefCounsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W, 

Washington, DC 2059) 

Phone: (202)267-3357 

Facsimile: (202)267-5106 

Email: charles.raley@faa.gov 

Dated: August 25, 2011 
08/31/201 1 14.35 FAX 2024935142 FAA - QMS 0003/00 3 

Certificate of Service 

i hereby certify that on this date I have placed in the U.S. mail, postage prepaid. 

certified return-receipt, a copy of Complainant's response to Respondent's Motion to 

Compel Discoven- 4 In //if ^faller ofM& R Helicopter, Docket No. CPlOSOOOl 10, 

FAA Case no. 2009SO950434, addressed to: 

Dr. Michael B- Selig 

President 

M & R Helicopters, LLC 

2045 Wcstgale Dr., Suite 205 

Bethlehem, PA 18017 

In addition. I hereby certify that on this date 1 have sent by the U.S. mail, postage 

prepaid, cenificd return-receipt and facsimile one copy of the foregoing document (o: 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

Ll.S. Department of Transportation 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room C 12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

Facsimile: 202-366-7536 

In addition, 1 hereby certify' that on this daic I have sent by the U.S. mail, postage 

prepaid, certified retum-receipt, the original and one copy of the foregoing document lo. 

Federal Aviation Administration 

SOO Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

Dated: August 25. 2011
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Celanese Holdings LLC(the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for theperiod ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, David N. Weidman, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and  2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company.Date: May 11, 2006     /s/ David N. Weidman       David N. Weidman     President and Chief Executive Officer
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

Add the work hours, parts cost, and number qf US. registered products to the table below. When you are 

finished click on the ·'Update Fields,. button to automaticalzvjill in the totals. 

Update Fields j 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Par1s Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Inspection (0.5 hours \ ~2 \{'_f) .lJ ~ I 0 

per window, 76 38 0 '1><2Hl.O< 1528 l II 

windows) 

.. OJ)'J ~ 0.00 \ O.tiO 

0 0 l ,') :1.on ' 0 IlL 

' (}, {) I (I I (I 0 !){, 

Of) (I 00 ) 0.00 

.... 18 I) Ill) ..; <LOO 

o.:.~ {l ()(! " 0 00 

l)oJ 0.00 ) 0.00 

:1- II) l.l,O ') (j .00 

o.:) ~· CJ .:.. 0 00 

0 (l ( .0(! ~ 0.00 

.~ OJ) ~ c l ") (j .00 

O.J • [l ~ n oo , () ,) ., .!'(1 ~ 0 00 

~" ) 0 •,.u 1 ~ u.oo 

00 ( I, ' (, lllJ 

s O.tl 'h ~· .O(J ' 0 {)() 

.... {) (l S I,(.), ' oon 

s J.O '() fl (' ' (' u{J 

s Q.u .;, l1 Ot' 0 00 

The known number of products in compliance: Number 

Total Costs of comQiiance for U.S. fleet: $4,935,440 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $Warranty 

On-Condition Cos ·~ Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

Action (include access, (@$85/hour) (e.g., Inspection, testing, and close- replacement) up) 

Inspection .., <1.0.! " O.Ou 

"> (} tl ) 1) n Oil 

"' ( 0:1 s 1l.Ofl 
'. 0 00 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to e;r:plain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to e.tplain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory ac ion"? ~ 

YES* 0 NO~ 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? '·~ 

YES* 0 NO~ 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. · 

YES 0 NO ~ 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? ~ 

YES* 0 NO 181 

*Explanation:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1250 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1250

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 18, 2019

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 11158 Highway 146 North in Hardin, Texas, as the ``Lucas Lowe 
                        Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LUCAS LOWE MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 11158 Highway 146 North in Hardin, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Lucas Lowe Memorial Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lucas Lowe 
Memorial Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 17, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Order entered September 16, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00957-CV

BRIAN A. SMALE, Appellant

V.

JOHN S. SMALE, PAMELA ANN WILLIAMS, JASON L. WILLIAMS, AND 

MICHELLE WILLIAMS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-50581-2014

ORDER

This is a pro se appeal from the trial court’s July 18, 2015 order of dismissal. According 

to appellant’s docketing statement, which was served on Evaleen M. Davis via email, appellees 

Pamela Ann Williams, Jason L. Williams, and Michelle Williams are represented by Ms. Davis. 

However, in an August 24, 2015 amended notice of nonrepresentation, Ms. Davis stated she 

represented appellee John S. Smale, who is deceased, in the trial court but is not “represent[ing] 

anyone in connection with this matter.” In a supplement to the amended nonrepresentation 

notice, Ms. Davis stated that she “received by email a document purporting to show [appellant] 

appearing on behalf of the estate of John S. Smale.” 
Generally, if a party to a civil case dies after the trial court renders judgment but before 

the case has been finally disposed on appeal, the appeal will proceed as if all parties were alive. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 7.1(a)(1). Although the clerk’s record has not been filed, documents filed in 

another case involving the same parties reflect John S. Smale died April 9, 2014, before the trial 

court rendered judgment in this case. Where a party dies before the decision of the trial court is 

rendered, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 150-155 apply. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 150-155. 

To better understand the posture of this case and because the appellate record is not due 

until November 16, 2015, we ORDER Collin County District Clerk Andrea Stroh Thompson to 

file, no later than September 25, 2015, a supplemental clerk’s record containing the latest filed 

pleadings by all parties, the trial court’s docket sheet, and all orders of the trial court, including 

the July 18, 2015 order of dismissal. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this 

order to the Honorable Jill Willis, Presiding Judge of the 429th Judicial District Court; Ms. 

Thompson; Ms. Davis; and Brian A. Smale. We further DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy to 

Pamela Smale Williams at wizardress.of.aahs@gmail.com and Jason Lawrence Williams at 

jwilliams9106@yahoo.com.

 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | 
|/s/ Craig O. Morrison   |  |  |  | /s/ William H. Carter  
|Craig O. Morrison       |  |  |  | William H. Carter      
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                        |  | 
|March 12, 2008          |  |  |  | March 12, 2008         

A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hexion Specialty Chemicals,
Inc. and will be retained by Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Peter L. Hauser, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this amended annual report on form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 ofEntrx Corporation; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; and 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation;and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
5.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:  March 31, 2005 /s/ Peter L. Hauser   By: Peter L. Hauser   President and Chief Executive Officer