alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1155 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs from conducting medical research causing significant pain or 

distress to dogs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2019 

Ms. TITUS (for herself, Mr. MAST, Mr. TED LIEU of California, Mr. ZELDIN, 

Mrs. WALORSKI, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania, 

Mr. COHEN, Ms. KUSTER of New Hampshire, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. TURNER, Mr. STAUBER, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Ms. NORTON, Mr. HASTINGS, 

Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. POSEY, Mr. COLLINS of New York, Mr. BEYER, Mr. 

SUOZZI, Mrs. BROOKS of Indiana, Mr. KATKO, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Ms. 

VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. FOSTER, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. 

ENGEL, Mr. CRIST, Mr. DEUTCH, Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New 

York, Mr. SOTO, Ms. BASS, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. CLARKE of New 

York, Ms. WILD, Ms. JAYAPAL, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. 

GUTHRIE, Mr. WELCH, Mrs. BEATTY, Mr. CARBAJAL, Mr. YARMUTH, 

Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. HURD of Texas, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. 

DAVID SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. LAWSON of Florida, Mr. AGUILAR, Mr. 

BLUMENAUER, Mr. ESTES, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. LAMB, Mr. EVANS, Mr. 

NEGUSE, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. TONKO, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. 

SWALWELL of California, and Ms. JOHNSON of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from conducting medical research causing significant pain or distress to dogs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1155 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing Unkind and 

3 Painful Procedures and Experiments on Respected Spe4 cies Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘PUPPERS Act of 2019’’. 

5 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF6 FAIRS MEDICAL RESEARCH CAUSING SIG7 NIFICANT PAIN OR DISTRESS TO DOGS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7303 of title 38, United 

9 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing new subsection: 

11 ‘‘(e)(1) In carrying out research, the Secretary may 

12 not purchase, breed, transport, house, feed, maintain, dis13 pose of, or experiment on dogs as part of the conduct of 

14 any study that causes significant pain or distress. 

15 ‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘study that causes 

16 significant pain or distress’— 

17 ‘‘(A) includes any study classified to pain cat18 egory D or E by the Department of Agriculture; and 

19 ‘‘(B) does not include any physical exam, train20 ing program, or study relating to service or working 

21 dogs.’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

23 subsection (a) shall take effect 90 days after the date of 

24 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Date: March 26 , 2015 Meeting: Tri-State NUCLA Faci li ty and MATS Rule(s) Discussed: Written Materials? Yes/No Na m e Org an iz a ti o n Pho n e Number
EXHIBIT 32
                                ==========




     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
     ---------------------------------------------------------------





The certification set forth below is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b)
or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and with Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Dennis Eldjarnson,
the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of Siam Imports, Inc. hereby certifies that:


1. the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Siam Imports, Inc.


                           SIAM IMPORTS, INC.,
                           a Nevada corporation (Registrant)

Dated: August 13, 2005     By: /s/ Dennis Eldjarnson, President,
                           CEO, Treasurer, CFO, Principal
                           Accounting Officer and Director
Client/Owner	On-Site	Safety	Acknowledgement	Form

Sponsor	/	Owner	Sign-off	

As	the	sponsor	or	owner	of	this	engagement	you	understand	that	Horus	Aerial	Services	operates	

under	the	following	rules	and	obligation	to	ensure	the	public	safety	and	privacy,	and	that	we	

follow	all	FAA	rules	and	guidelines.	

As	the	sponsor	/	owner	of	this	engagement	you	agree	to	the	following	through	your	initial	of	

each	item	and	signature	at	the	bottom	of	this	page.	

Julian	Everly	Creative	Ventures,	Inc. has	advised	you	as	to	the	following:	 Initial:	

· _We	will	not	fly	within	1	mile	of	FAA	Restricted	Zones	 ______	

· _We	will	not	fly	over	400’	AGL	of	the	current	launch	elevation ______	

· _We	will	not	fly	if	a	50”	Launch/Landing	parameter	cannot	be	established	 ______	

· _We	will	land	the	craft	immediately	of	any	technical	issues	occur	 ______	

· _We	will	land	the	craft	if	on-site	activity	occurs	that	presents	a	security	concern	 ______	

Privacy	Concerns:	

· _If	Neighbors	have	a	privacy	concern,	we	will	not	fly	until	it	is	resolved	 ______	

· _If	pictures	taken	has	a	privacy	concern,	it	will	not	be	made	available ______	

Safety:	

· _You	agree	to	assist	in	the	limiting	of	people	within	the	launch/landing	area	 ______	

· _You	agree	to	assist	in	the	support	of	all	other	identified	safety	areas	 ______

Safety	Checklist	Signatures	

Sponsor	/	Owner	

<Name	and	address	is	normally	listed	below>	__________________________________	

Julian	Everly	Creative	Ventures,	Inc.

Julian	Wright

2024	R	Street,	NW

Washington,	DC 20009 ___________________________
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 8, 2015

No. 04-15-00195-CR

IN RE Douglas R. LYON

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On April 1, 2015, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. This court has 

determined that we do not have jurisdiction to consider the requested relief. The petition is 

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on April 8, 2015.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 1993CR5434, styled The State of Texas v. Douglas R. Lyon, pending in 

the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Sid L. Harle presiding.
COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 69th District Court of Moore County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on January 16,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Francisco Javier Pedraza v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 07-14-00042-CR Trial Court Number: 4903

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated January 16, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on April 7, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bar Association
Members/State Street Collective Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James S. Phalen, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                                     /s/ James S. Phalen
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     James S. Phalen
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     August 14, 2003
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of Finlay Enterprises, Inc., (the "Company") does hereby certify with
respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
July 31, 2004 (the "Report") that:

    1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: September 9, 2004
                                                     /s/ Bruce E. Zurlnick
                                                     ---------------------
                                                     Bruce E. Zurlnick
                                                     Senior Vice President,
                                                     Treasurer and Chief
                                                     Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
```
**Exhibit 21.1**PRA InternationalSubsidiaries4079558 Canada Inc. (Canada)“Buyer” 4063988 (Canada)“Call Co” 3065613 (Canada)GMG BioBusiness Ltd.International Medical Technical Consultants, Inc. (Delaware, United States)MFH, Inc. (Delaware, United States)Pharmaceutical Research Associates AG (Switzerland)Pharmaceutical Research Associates Belgium, BVBA (Belgium)Pharmaceutical Research Associates Benelux, BVBA (Belgium)Pharmaceutical Research Associates Espana, SA (Spain)Pharmaceutical Research Associates Global, Inc. (Canada)Pharmaceutical Research Associates GmbH (Germany)Pharmaceutical Research Associates (HK) Ltd. (Hong Kong)Pharmaceutical Research Associates, Hungary Research and Development Ltd. (Hungary)Pharmaceutical Research Associates Inc. (Canada)Pharmaceutical Research Associates, Inc. (Virginia, United States)Pharmaceutical Research Associates International, Inc. (Canada)Pharmaceutical Research Associates Italia s.r.l. (Italy)Pharmaceutical Research Associates Ltda. (Brazil)Pharmaceutical Research Associates Mexico S.R.L. de C.V. (Mexico)Pharmaceutical Research Associates PTY Limited (Australia)Pharmaceutical Research Associates SARL (France)Pharmaceutical Research Associates Singapore Pte. Ltd. (Singapore)
 

 
Pharmaceutical Research Associates Sp.Zoo. (Poland)Pharmaceutical Research Associates Taiwan, Inc. (Taiwan)Pharm Research Associates Russia Ltd. (England and Wales)Pharm Research Associates RX, Inc. (Canada)Pharm Research Associates (UK) Ltd. (England and Wales)Pharm Research Limited (England and Wales)PRA International Operations, Inc. (Delaware, United States)PRA Pharmaceutical India Private Limited (India)PRA Pharmaceutical (Pty) Ltd. (South Africa)PRA Sub, Inc. (Delaware, United States)Regulatory/Clinical Consultants, Inc. (Missouri, United States)Trilass Inc. (Canada)
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9594]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[Docket No. FD 35607]


Manning Rail, Inc.--Acquisition and Operation Exemption--Manning 
Grain Company

    Manning Rail, Inc. (MRI), a noncarrier, has filed a verified notice 
of exemption \1\ under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire from Manning Grain 
Company (MGC) and operate a 7.1-mile rail line between its point of 
connection with BNSF Railway Company at milepost 8.1 at or near 
Fairmont and terminus at milepost 15.2 at or near Burress, in Fillmore 
County, Neb. (the Line).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ MRI initially filed its verified notice of exemption on 
March 8, 2012. By decision served on March 20, 2012, the notice was 
held in abeyance at MRI's request to enable MRI to investigate the 
history of the line. By letter filed on March 22, 2012, MRI requests 
that the proceeding be restored to active status.
    \2\ MGC obtained authority to acquire the Line in Manning Grain 
Company--Acquisition and Operation Exemption--Fillmore Western 
Railway Company, FD 35612 (STB served Apr. 6, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The earliest this transaction may be consummated is May 4, 2012, 
the effective date of the exemption.
    MRI certifies that its projected annual revenues as a result of 
this transaction will not exceed those that would qualify it as a Class 
III rail carrier and will not exceed $5 million.
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption 
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a 
petition to revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the 
exemption. Petitions to stay must be filed no later than April 27, 2012 
(at least 7 days before the exemption becomes effective).
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to Docket No. 
FD 35607, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E 
Street SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each 
pleading must be served on Thomas F. McFarland, Thomas F. McFarland, 
P.C., 208 South LaSalle Street, Suite 1890, Chicago, IL 60604-1112.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at 
``www.stb.dot.gov.''

    Decided: April 17, 2012.

    By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2012-9594 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kentucky First Federal
Bancorp (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Tony D. Whitaker, the President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Tony D. Whitaker
-------------------------------------------------
Tony D. Whitaker
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
February 24, 2005
Fourth Department,

June, 1991

(June 7, 1991)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sixto Jansen, Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of criminal sale and criminal possession of cocaine. On appeal, he contends that the court abused its discretion in admitting rebuttal testimony and that his conviction is against the weight of the evidence.

The rebuttal testimony was properly admitted. The Court of Appeals has defined proper rebuttal evidence as " 'not merely evidence which contradicts the witnesses on the opposite side and corroborates those of the party who began, but evidence in denial of some affirmative fact which the answering party has endeavored to prove’ ” *(People v Harris,*57 NY2d 335, 345, *cert denied*460 US 1047, quoting *Marshall v Davies,*78 NY 414, 420). Here, contrary to defendant’s contention, the rebuttal testimony could not have been offered as part of the People’s direct case. It was offered merely to disprove an affirmative fact that the defense had attempted to prove. The court allowed the witness to testify that, at specified times, an individual of a certain description, driving a certain vehicle, left and returned to the house where the drug sale was consummated. The court explicitly precluded the witness from identifying that individual as defendant. It was not initially probative of the People’s case against defendant that an individual left and returned to the house shortly prior to the drug sale. That testimony was rendered probative, however, when defendant, in an attempt to establish his claim of alibi and mistaken identity, testified that he had been driving that vehicle elsewhere that night.

Turning to defendant’s remaining contention, we conclude that the jury did not fail "to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded” *(People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J. *969—Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Denman, Lawton, Lowery and Davis, JJ.
Certified California Lamb 

Schedule CCL

Approved

March 17, 2015

USDA, AMS, LPS, QAD, SB

Washington, DC 20250

Page 1 of 1

USDA SPECIFICATION FOR CERTIFICATION OF LAMB CARCASS

QUALITY AND YIELD CHARACTERISTICS OF OFFICIALLY GRADED LAMB

This specification is for certification by an Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) agent for

carcasses which are derived from certain carcass characteristics of lamb carcasses which 

have been officially identified for quality and yield grade, and will: (a) carcasses must be 

accompanied with documentation approved by the California Wool Growers Association 

(CWGA) verifying California born and raised, and (b) meet the following set of requirements:

1. U.S. Prime or Choice quality grade;

2. A yield grade of 1, 2, or 3

 3. Carcasses must be in excellent condition

4. Dressed carcass weight not to exceed 85 lbs.

CERTIFICATION

An AMS agent will certify acceptable carcasses. Carcasses to be examined for compliance 

with the requirements of this specification shall be clearly identified when presented to the 

AMS agent for certification. Procedures for identification, certification, the removal of 

preliminary identification marks (or other methods of control) from non-qualifying carcasses, 

and control of certified carcasses shall be in accordance with established Quality Assessment 

Division (QAD) procedures. 

The costs of all grading and certification services performed by the AMS agent involving 

examinations, supervision, official documentation, and related services shall be borne by the 

person, group, or plant requesting the service.

LABELING

Labeling of Certified California Lamb products shall be in compliance with Food Safety and 

Inspection Service regulations and policy guidelines, QAD instructions and Livestock, Poultry

and Seed Program Policy Standardization Procedure 2.
#### Rudolph VEGLIANTE, Jr., petitioner, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, DIVISION OF TAXATION.

No. 02-665.

Jan. 13, 2003.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Marketing and Regulatory Programs – Agricultural Marketing Service – Specialty Crops Program – Specialty Crops Inspection Division 1 of 1

Frozen Lima Beans - Guide for Color Scores Inspection Aid No. 7

July 2016

Thin Seeded Type (With Skins Removed) Thick Seeded Baby Potato Type (With Skins On)

Percent White By Count

Grade

Green 

% By 

Count

0 1 2 3 4-9 10-15 16-25 26-35 36-50 51-65 66-80 81-100

A 1

100 60

99 60 58

98 59 57 56

97 58 56 55 54

96 57 56 53 53 52

95 56 55 53 53 52

94 55 55 53 53 52

93 55 54 53 53 52

B 2

91-92 53 53 53 53 52

89-90 53 53 53 53 52 52

85-88 52 52 52 52 51 51

80-84 51 51 51 51 50 50 49

65-79 50 50 50 50 49 49 48 48

C 2

50-64 47 47 47 47 47 46 46 46 46

35-49 46 46 45 45 45 44 44 44 44 44

20-34 45 45 45 45 44 44 44 43 43 43 43

0-19 44 44 44 44 43 43 43 43 42 42 42 42

Thick Seeded Type (With Skins On)

Percent White By Count

Grade

Green 

% By 

Count

0 1 2 3 4-5 6-10 11-20 21-35 36-50 51-65 66-80 81-100

A 1

99-

100 60 58

97-98 59 56 53

95-96 58 56 53 52 50

93-94 57 55 53 52 50 47

90-92 56 54 52 52 50 47

85-89 55 54 52 52 50 47 45

B 2

80-84 53 53 52 51 49 47 45

75-79 53 52 51 50 49 47 45 41

70-74 52 51 51 50 49 47 44 41

65-69 51 50 50 49 48 46 44 41

60-64 50 49 49 48 48 46 44 41 40

C 2

55-59 47 47 47 47 46 45 43 41 40

50-54 47 47 47 46 46 44 43 41 40

35-49 46 46 46 45 45 44 42 40 40 38

20-34 45 45 45 44 44 43 42 40 39 37 36

0-19 44 44 43 43 43 42 42 39 38 36 34 32

Substandard – Score 0 to 41 points if: Sample as a whole is definitely off-color, (whether or not due to discolored 

beans scored as major defects) or thick-seeded type containing more than 20 percent white beans.

 

1 Grade A – Color must be bright and typical

2 Grade B and C – Color must be typical