alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

LAWRENCE DAVID PHILLIPS, JR. NO. 2021 CW 1444

VERSUS

EXXON CHEMICAL LOUISIANA, MARCH 17, 2022

LLC, ET AL

In Re: Exxon Mobil Corporation, applying for supervisory

writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East

Baton Rouge, No. 691, 676. 

BEFORE: GUIDRY, WELCH, HOLDRIDGE, CHUTZ, AND LANIER, JJ. 

WRIT GRANTED. A party may not assign as error the giving

of a jury instruction unless he objects thereto either before

the jury retired to consider its verdict or immediately after

the jury retires, stating specifically the matter to which he

objects and the grounds of his objection. La. Code Civ. P. art. 

1793( C). A district court' s reliance on improper jury

instructions in support of a grant of a new trial is " erroneous

as a matter of law" where the party in whose favor the new trial

was granted failed to object to the charge at trial. See Davis

v. Witt, 2002- 3102 ( La. 7/ 2/ 03), 851 So. 2d 1119, 1132, citing

La. Code Civ. P. art. 1793( C); see also Boylston v. Tidwell, 

36, 730 ( La. App. 2d Cir. 8/ 22/ 03), 852 So. 2d 1256. The

plaintiffs in this case also failed to demonstrate that the jury

instructions misled the jury to the extent that it was prevented

from dispensing justice. See Adams v. Rhodia, Inc., 2007- 2110

La. 5/ 21/ 08), 983 So. 2d 798, 804 (" Determining whether an

erroneous jury instruction has been given requires a comparison

of the degree of error with the jury instructions as a whole and

the circumstances of the case."). Therefore, we grant this writ

application, reverse the district court' s July 12, 2021 judgment

granting the plaintiffs' motion for new trial, and deny same. 

JMG

GH

WIL

Welch and Chutz, JJ., dissent and would deny the writ

application. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

UOEPUTY CILAERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 50704 Conference Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **David Arturo Jasso**

**- Lujan,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas No. 7:20

- CR

- 100

- 1

Before **Smith, Stewart,** and **Higginson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
The attorney appointed to represent David Jasso

- Lujan has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jasso

- Lujan has filed a response.

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opin

ion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 26, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-50704 Document: 00515835861 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/26/2021No. 20

- 5070 4

2 We have reviewed counse l’s brief , relevant portions of the record , and Jasso

- Lujan ’s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the ap

peal presents no nonfrivolous issue for review. Ac cord ingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from fur ther re spon si

bilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R**

**.** 42. 2. Case: 20-50704 Document: 00515835861 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/26/2021
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

April 7, 2015

Hon. Tabeth Gardner

District Clerk

DeWitt County Courthouse

P. O. Box 845

Cuero, TX 77954

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-14-00668-CV

Tr.Ct.No. 10-08-21,636

Style: Enrique Villa v. Elizabeth Ortiz Villa

The judgment of the trial court in the above cause was DISMISSED-WANT OF 

JURISDICTION by this Court on the 22nd day of January, 2015. The mandate is enclosed.

Costs of the appeal were adjudged against appellant, Enrique Villa. 

Pursuant to Section 51.204(b) of the Government Code, the attorneys of record are 

hereby notified that any exhibits submitted to the Court by a party may be withdrawn by that 

party or the party’s attorney of record within 30 days. Exhibits on file with the Court will be 

destroyed three (3) years after final disposition of the case or at an earlier date if ordered by the 

Court.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

Enc.

cc: Enrique Villa

Hon. Ashley J. Pall (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)**


**OF
      THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Airbee Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Sundaresan Raja, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of the operations of the
      Company.





/s/
                Sundaresan RajaSundaresan
                RajaPrincipal
                Executive Officer





November
      19, 2008
Exhibit 10.4
 SECOND AMENDMENT
TO THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT
 th
  Exchange Right
 Exchange Right. (i) At any time and from time to time after the fifth anniversary
of the date of that certain Partner Agent Program Agreement between the Company and the
Purchaser (the Partner Agent Agreement), provided that the Partner Agent Agreement is
still in effect and has not been terminated by either party thereto, the Purchaser shall
have the right, but not the obligation, to exchange its shares of Class B Stock for an
equal number of shares of Common Stock (subject to equitable adjustment in the event of any
stock dividend, stock split, combination, reorganization, recapitalization,
reclassification or other similar event involving a change in such security); provided,
further, that after the fifth anniversary of the date of the Partner Agent Agreement and
for so long as the Partner Agent Agreement is in effect, including any day or days on which
the Purchaser exercises such exchange right, the Purchaser must retain legal and beneficial
ownership for its own benefit of such number of shares of Class B Stock as could be
exchanged for the same number of shares of Common Stock, whichever is less, (1) with a
value on such date of $500,000, as determined pursuant to Section 4(g) or (2) which equals
half of the number of shares of Class B Stock purchased by the Purchaser pursuant to this
Agreement.
 Purchase obligation
 If the aggregate value of the Class B Stock held by the Purchaser is determined to be less
than $500,000, then the Purchaser shall purchase from the Company
such number of shares of Class B Stock as would equal the difference between the value of
the Class B Stock as determined herein and $500,000.




---



##### 



If the aggregate value of the Class B Stock held by the Purchaser is determined to be less
than $500,000, then the Purchaser shall purchase from the Company such number of shares of
Class B Stock, if any, as would equal, whichever is less, (1) the difference between the
value of the Class B Stock as determined herein and $500,000 or (2) half of the number of
shares of Class B Stock purchased by the Purchaser pursuant to this Agreement.
  SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS ALLIANCE, INC.
 By:
    /s/ Daniel A. CacchioneName:
    Daniel A. CacchioneTitle:
    Senior Vice President, Chief Underwriting Officer AMERICAN TEAM MANAGERS INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.
 By:
    /s/ Chris MichaelsName:
    Chris MichaelsTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer 2
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                 Tom Brown, Inc.
                             555 Seventeenth Street
                                   Suite 1850
                             Denver, Colorado 80202

                                  April 8, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 5th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release Nos. 33-8070; 34-45590;
35-27503; 39-2935; IA-2018; IC-25464; FR-62; File No. S7-03-02, this letter is
to confirm that Tom Brown, Inc. ("TBI") has received assurance from its
independent public accountants, Arthur Andersen LLP ("Arthur Andersen"), that
Arthur Andersen's audit of our consolidated financial statements as of December
31, 2001 and for the year then ended (the "Audit") was subject to Arthur
Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice
to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance
with professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Arthur
Andersen personnel working on the Audit, availability of national office
consultation, and availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur
Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the Audit.

                                       TOM BROWN, INC.

                                       /s/ DANIEL G. BLANCHARD
                                       --------------------------------
                                       EXECUTIVE  VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF
                                       FINANCIAL OFFICER AND TREASURER
LP-7 (Expiration Date 11/30/2024)

OMB No. 0581-0093

NOMINEE’S AGREEMENT TO SERVE

If appointed, I agree to serve on the American Egg Board (Board), and to disclose 

any relationship with any egg promotion entity or any organization that has a 

contractual relationship with the Board.

_____________________________ _______________________

Signature Date

Note: According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to 

a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 

0581-0093. There is no time estimated to complete this information collection because it requires only a signature.

In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its 

Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based 

on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, 

family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights 

activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing 

deadlines vary by program or incident. 

Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, 

American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or 

contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages 

other than English. 

To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at 

http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all 

of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter 

to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights; 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.;

Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, 

employer, and lender.
EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference of our report dated  February 20,
1998, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Blessings  Corporation for
the year ended December 31, 1997.

                                                     Registration
                         Form                        Statement No.

                         S-8                            33-41762
                         S-8                            33-54108
                         S-8                            33-70328
                         S-8                            33-85382
                         S-8                            33-85384
                         S-8                            33-12387
                         S-8                            33-31303
                         S-8                            33-35611


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Richmond, Virginia
March 26, 1998
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bar Association Members/Northern Trust Collective Trust (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas R. Benzmiller, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for
purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Thomas R. BenzmillerThomas R. Benzmiller Principal
Executive Officer August 16, 2010
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Dean L. Cash, certifythat:

1.                                I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-QSB of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund XI, LLC;

2.                                Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.                                Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.                                The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

a)             Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b)            Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c)             Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.                                The registrant’s (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a)             All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)            Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:         August 15, 2005
| /s/ Dean L. Cash                          |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dean L. Cash                              |   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer of |   |
| Managing Member                           |   |

 

----
CONTINUATION SHEET: Part II – Human Exposure and En vironmental Release Section B – Industrial Sites Controlled by Others
The PMN substance {xxxxx} will be sold to customer s for use as a general assembly adhesive for commercial applications. The primary use of the PM N substance will be as a seating assembly adhesive. While the exact details of the manner in which cust omers will use the PMN substance are not available to {xxxxx}, {xxxxx} can offer the following genera l information:
{xxxxx} will be shipped to customers in the form o f a solid, typically in 55 gallon drums. At custome r facilities, the drums will be heated on a plate, an d the heated liquid form of the polymer will be transferred from shipping drums to application equi pment through flexible hoses to nozzles that will apply the liquid polymer as a bead to substrate. I t is also possible that {xxxxx} will be applied to some substrates via roll coating or spray equipment. In all three cases, the application of the {xxxxx} tothe substrate is effectively performed in a closed syst em. Employees handling and shipping drums in the bulk melting area and around the application equipm ent will wear goggles, gloves, and clothing that wi ll safeguard against dermal exposure to the {xxxxx} . These areas will be serviced by local ventilation

. Empty shipping drums that may contain residual amou nts of the PMN substance will likely be disposed of in an approved landfill. Since the PMN substanc e is a moisture-curable polyurethane any residual polymer remaining into the drums will undergo curin g due exposure to atmospheric moisture and at the time the drums are disposed of, the polymer will bepresent in the drums in cured form. {xxxxx} believes that it is reasonable to conclude that sol vent-based equipment cleaning effluents generated a t customer facilities will be sent off-site as hazard ous waste for incineration. If the solvents are se parated from the equipment cleaning effluents (e.g. white f ilm evaporator), the polymer that remains from the separation will begin to cure following exposure to atmospheric moisture. In this case, the cured polymer will likely be disposed of by customer in a pproved landfills.
In light of the above, {xxxxx} concludes that ther e will likely be no release of the uncured form of the polymeric PMN substance to the environment.
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May      13, 2010 |   | /s/      Harvey W. Schiller |
|-------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
|              |   | Name:                       | Harvey      W. Schiller |
|              |   | Title:                      | Chairman      of the Board and |
|              |   |                        | Chief      Executive Officer |
|              |   |                        |  (Principal      Executive Officer) |

----
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1005 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to amend the schedule for rating 

disabilities to add a diagnostic code and evaluation criteria for obliterative 

bronchiolitis, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2019 

Mr. CASTRO of Texas (for himself, Mr. STAUBER, Mr. RUIZ, and Mr. 

CISNEROS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to amend the 

schedule for rating disabilities to add a diagnostic code 

and evaluation criteria for obliterative bronchiolitis, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Burn Pit Veterans Re5 vision Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1005 IH

1 SEC. 2. REVISION OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

2 DISABILITY RATING SCHEDULE WITH RE3 SPECT TO OBLITERATIVE BRONCHIOLITIS. 

4 Not later than 180 days after the date of the enact5 ment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall— 

6 (1) amend the schedule for rating disabilities 

7 pursuant to section 1155 of title 38, United States 

8 Code, to add a diagnostic code and evaluation cri9 teria for obliterative bronchiolitis; and 

10 (2) provide a process by which a veteran who, 

11 as of the date of the enactment of this Act, is receiv12 ing compensation under chapter 11 of such title for 

13 a service-connected disability— 

14 (A) may have such service-connected dis15 ability reevaluated based on the diagnostic code 

16 and evaluation criteria described in paragraph 

17 (1); and 

18 (B) may be assigned a new disability rat19 ing as a result of such reevaluation, if such as20 signment does not reduce the disability rating 

21 of such veteran in effect immediately prior to 

22 the date of such assignment. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS