alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
EXHIBIT 27 (G)

                       NONFINANCIAL STATEMENT DISCLOSURES
                                 REGULATION S-B

                                                                                
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the Company
10-QSB for the twelve months ended May 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                   1,000
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                          MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                                    41
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          1,515
<ALLOWANCES>                                             150
<INVENTORY>                                            4,687
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       7,453
<PP&E>                                                10,519
<DEPRECIATION>                                         7,747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        11,565
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  5,706
<BONDS>                                                3,912
<COMMON>                                               1,144
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                                79
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          11,565
<SALES>                                               16,271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      16,271
<CGS>                                                 11,152
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          3,631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         (51)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     1,118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          421
<INCOME-TAX>                                             110
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      531
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                             531
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            .15
                             

</TABLE>
#### Fred ABRAHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

No. 4013.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

April 13, 1979.

Allan Beiswenger, Asst. Public Defender, Bethel, Brian Shortell, Public Defender, Anchorage, for appellant.

Julia Swan, Asst. Dist. Atty., Victor C. Krumm, Dist. Atty., Bethel, Avrum M. Gross, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellee.

OPINION

Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and RABI-NOWITZ, CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in appellant’s contention that his sentence is excessive.1 Therefore, the judgment of the superior court is AFFIRMED.

1

. Appellant, while intoxicated, dragged a nineteen year old student behind a dormitory and slit her throat twice while attempting to rape her. He was convicted of stabbing with intent to kill, wound or maim and assault with intent to rape. Stabbing with intent to kill, wound or maim is punishable by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than 20 years. AS 11.15.150. Assault with intent to rape is punishable by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than 15 years. AS 11.15.160. Appellant was sentenced to concurrent terms of 10 and 8 years respectively.
# FY2013 Vendor Table

&"-,Bold"AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE COMMODITY PURCHASESFY-2013OCTOBER 1, 2012 - SEPTEMBER 30, 2013	

&"-,Bold"U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE	&"-,Bold"PAGE &P OF &N	&"-,Bold"FOR MORE INFORMATION CALL:  202-720-4517
Exhibit 15.4  LOGO March 1, 2023 Hammerhead Energy Inc. Eighth Avenue Place East Tower, Suite 2700 525 8th Avenue SW Calgary, Alberta T2P 1G1 Canada CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS We hereby consent to the use and reference to our name under the caption Statement by Experts in the Shell Company Report on Form 20-F of Hammerhead Energy Inc., filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2023, and any amendments thereto (the Shell Company Report), and to the
filing of our reports auditing Hammerhead Resources Inc.s oil and gas reserves data as of December 31, 2021, December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 (the Reports) as exhibits to the Shell Company Report and the use
of information derived from the Reports in the Shell Company Report. Yours truly, McDANIEL & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD.  /s/ Michael J. VerneyMichael J. Verney, P.Eng.Executive Vice PresidentCalgary, AlbertaMarch 1, 2023 2000, Eighth Avenue Place, East Tower, 525  8 Avenue SW, Calgary AB T2P 1G1 Tel: (403) 262-5506 www.mcdan.com
ACCEPTED12-14-00140-CRTWELFTH COURT OF APPEALSTYLER, TEXAS4/13/2015 2:44:24 PMCATHY LUSKCLERK
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ZHAO JIN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-73187

Agency No. A088-112-411

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 24, 2016**

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Zhao Jin, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, 

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 3 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 13-73187

Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial 

evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse 

credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 

F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the 

petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Jin’s challenge to the IJ’s denial of his CAT 

claim because he failed to raise the issue before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 

358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination 

based on Jin’s misrepresentations to immigration officials and on the IJ’s 

demeanor finding. See Shrestha, 590 F.3d at 1048 (describing an adverse 

credibility determination as reasonable when “grounded in the record and based on 

real problems . . . not mere trivialities.”); see also Huang v. Holder, 744 F.3d 1149, 

1153 (9th Cir. 2014) (explaining “[t]he need for deference [in credibility cases] is 

particularly strong in the context of demeanor assessments.”). Thus, in the

absence of credible testimony, Jin’s asylum and withholding of removal claims 

fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.27

                       SPECIAL FISCAL 2002 INCENTIVE PLAN

A special fiscal year 2002 incentive opportunity has been developed to provide
additional reward for exceptional fiscal 2002 profit and ROIC performance.

Objective - Focus and reward key executives' efforts on immediate earnings
growth recovery, simultaneously with reducing invested capital.

Eligibility - Approximately 60-70 key executives consisting of all officers, all
major profit center heads, and designated others.

Performance Period - Fiscal 2002

Payout Opportunity (Norm) - 25%-35% of base salary plus annual bonus norm for
officers and presidents; flat $40,000 for all others. Payout will be in addition
to any payout from the annual bonus plan, but will be in lieu of a new unit
under the long-term incentive plan.

Payout Opportunity (Range) - The award opportunity is denominated in dollars and
will range from 50% of norm at payout threshold, to 150% of norm at payout
maximum.

Performance Objectives

Before any payout will be made a minimum corporate Return On Invested Capital
(ROIC) of 13.2% must be achieved. Year end invested capital will be used for
this purpose.

If the 13.2% ROIC is achieved plan payout will be a variable amount based on EPS
ranging from 50% to 150% of annual bonus norm if EPS is equal to or greater than

<PAGE>

$1.75, with the 50% minimum payable if EPS is equal to $1.75, the 150% maximum
payable if EPS is equal to or greater than $1.85, and the amount payable if the
percentage is between 50% and 150% calculated on a linear progression basis if
EPS is between $1.75 and $1.85, so that, by way of example, 100% of plan
incentive will be payable if EPS is $1.80.

Payout Form and Special Conditions

Payout to officers will be in the form of restricted stock that vests on the
second anniversary of grant.

Payout to profit center heads will be half in cash (immediate) and half in
restricted stock (with the same vesting term as above).

Payout to all others will be 100% cash.

Payout in restricted stock will delay tax until vesting occurs, although 83(b)
elections will be available.

Termination due to death, disability or change in control during the two-year
stock restriction period will result in immediate vesting. Retirement (age 55
and 10 years) during this period will result in immediate vesting if approved by
the Executive Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Board. All other
terminations will result in forfeiture of the restricted stock.

Dividends will be paid on restricted stock during the restriction period.

Payments under this program will not be included in compensation for pension
benefit determination.

Cash payouts will be eligible for deferral in the non-qualified deferred
compensation plan.
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, James A. Morris, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this amended Annual Report (the Report) on Form 10-KSB of the small business issuer;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;  4.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:9/14/07By:/s/James A. MorrisJames A. Morris    Secretary and Director
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1206 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1206

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify that noncitizen 
   nationals of the United States who are children of United States 
  citizens are eligible for United States citizenship, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2019

Mrs. Radewagen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify that noncitizen 
   nationals of the United States who are children of United States 
  citizens are eligible for United States citizenship, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONDITIONS OF ACQUIRING CITIZENSHIP FOR NONCITIZEN NATIONALS 
              OF THE UNITED STATES WHO ARE CHILDREN OF UNITED STATES 
              CITIZENS.

    Section 320(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1431) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting 
        after ``outside of the United States'' the following: ``, or 
        born in an outlying possession of the United States,''; and
            (2) in paragraph (3), by inserting before the period at the 
        end the following: ``, except that the requirement under this 
        paragraph to be admitted to the United States as a lawful 
        permanent resident shall not apply in the case of a child born 
        in an outlying possession of the United States''.
                                 <all>
```
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 38

 40

 42

 44

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/31

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■ ■

■

■

★

●

●

●

●

★ ● ●

●

●
Exhibit 10.16

DIRECTORS COMPENSATION SUMMARY SHEET

Nonemployee directors receive
compensation for board service. Payment dates are the last working day of March, June, September, and December. That compensation includes:



|                                 |  |                                                                                                                                            
|-------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Annual Retainer:                 |  | $51,000                                                                                                                                    
|                                 | 
|Chair Retainers:                 |  | $125,000 annually for the Non-Executive Chairman of the Board                                                                              
|                                 | 
|                                 |  | $30,000 annually for lead independent director (i.e., Outside Directors Committee chair) if there is no Non-Executive Chairman of the Board
|                                 | 
|                                 |  | $30,000 annually for Audit Committee chair                                                                                                 
|                                 | 
|                                 |  | $20,000 annually for Executive Compensation Committee chair                                                                                
|                                 | 
|                                 |  | $10,000 annually for Governance and Nominating Committee chair and all other committee chairs                                              
|                                 | 
|Attendance Fees:                 |  | $2,000 for each board meeting (attended in person, conducted by telephone, or written consent in lieu of meeting)                          
|                                 | 
|                                 |  | $1,000 for each committee meeting (attended in person, conducted by telephone, or written consent in lieu of meeting)                      
|                                 | 
|                                 |  | Expenses related to attendance                                                                                                             
|                                 | 
|Equity Based Compensation Award: |  | $100,000 annually
2015 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

4-8-2015

CBS Corp v. Schindler Elevator

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015

This April is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University

School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2015 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of

Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"CBS Corp v. Schindler Elevator" (2015). 2015 Decisions. Paper 350.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015/350
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

______

No. 14-3397

______

CBS CORPORATION,

 Appellant

v.

SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION

______

United States District Court for the 

Western District of Pennsylvania

(2-12-cv-01027)

District Judge: Honorable David S. Cercone

______

Present: FISHER, HARDIMAN, ROTH, Circuit Judges.

______

ORDER 

______

The parties agree that the District Court did not have subject matter jurisdiction 

over this state-law breach of contract action because diversity of citizenship never 

existed. Therefore, the District Court lacked the constitutional authority to “proceed at all 

in [this] cause.” Ex parte McCardle, 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 506, 514 (1868). On consideration 

whereof, it is now hereby

ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this Court that the judgment of the District Court 

entered June 26, 2014, be and the same is hereby VACATED and this case is 

REMANDED with instructions that the case be dismissed without prejudice.

BY THE COURT

s/ D. Michael Fisher 

Circuit Judge

Dated: April 8, 2015

ARL/cc: FWB; SD; BWF; SWZ; RAC; DCS
Marketing and Regulatory Programs – Agricultural Marketing Service – Specialty Crops Program – Specialty Crops Inspection Division 1 of 1

 Inspection Aid No. 1

 Frozen Strawberry Guide - Color Requirements July 2016

U. S. Grade Score 

Points Overall Color Requirements as a Mass Requirements for Individual Units 1

A

36

to

40

Reasonably Uniform,

Good Characteristic Pink to Red Color

Not More Than

Slightly Affected By

Dull, Gray or Reddish-Brown Cast

85% Good Characteristic Pink to Red Color Over

Practically the Entire Outer Surfaces

Not More Than

5% Less Than 4/5 (Whole Style) or

1⁄2 (Sliced Style) of Surface Area of a

Good Characteristic Pink to Red Color

or are Materially Darkened

B

32

to

35

Fairly Uniform,

Good Characteristic Pink to Red Color

Not More Than

Materially Affected By

Dull, Gray or Reddish-Brown 

75% Good Characteristic Pink to Red Color Over

Practically the Entire Outer Surfaces

Not More Than

10% Possess Less Than 4/5 (Whole Style) or

1⁄2 (Sliced Style) of Surface Area of a

Good Characteristic Pink to Red Color

or are Materially Darkened

C

28

to

31

May Be Variable,

Predominate Characteristic

Pink to Red Color

Not

Seriously Affected By Dull,

Gray or Slightly Dark Color

100% May Fail to Meet Good Characteristic Pink to

Red Color Over Practically the Entire Outer Surfaces

Not More Than

15% Possess Less Than 4/5 (Whole Style) or

1⁄2 (Sliced Style) of Surface Area of a

Characteristic Pink to Red Color

or are Materially Darkened 

Substandard

0

to

27

Fails To Meet Requirements of U. S. Grade C

 

1 Tolerances based on percent by count for whole style or by weight for sliced style.