alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Overview of livestock health and conditions:

Extremely thin 

1 

Frame obvious 

2 

Body condition 

3 

Good fat cover

Well covered 

4

Obese 

5 

Very clean 

1

Hygiene 

2

Manure stains

Wet or dry manure 

3 

On legs udder 

Extremely dirty 

4 

Normal 

1 

Locomotion 

2 

Slightly affected

3

Cannot keep up 

with herd 

Limping 

4

Can’t bear weight 

5

Hock condition 

1

May have hair loss

Swelling 

2

Number of cows missing 

patches of hair due to mange 

or lice

Number of cows with broken 

tails 

Ammonia odor present

Housing type: Milking herd __________________________Dry cows 

__________________________

 Heifers ______________________________ Calves 

____________________________

Three items done well at this farm: 

LC 1 Dairy auditor score sheet
Three items that may need attention at this farm:

LC 2 Dairy auditor score sheet
ASL SUPPORT 

This FVIAC Virtual meeting provides American Sign Language (ASL) Interpreters for 

those who need or prefer ASL support. Please see the names below. 

ASL-Heidi Johnson

ASL-Brenda Wharton

Search across the video feeds to find one of the ASL interpreters’ video feed. Please use 

the Zoom “pin” feature to lock the preferred video feed(s) to your viewing screen. 

Instructions on how to “pin” a video are provided via the following page.

Thank you for joining us! 
Pinning participants' videos

Overview

Pin video allows the host to disable active speaker view and only view up to 9 specific speakers, while other meeting participants 

can pin one video on their end. You can also pin videos in Zoom Rooms. 

If a participant is recording locally and pins a video, the pinned video will be recorded unless the participant who is recording 

changes their video layout. Pinning another participant's video will only affect your local view and local recordings, not the view of 

other participants or cloud recordings.

The host can also spotlight up to 9 videos. Spotlight video puts a participant as the primary active speaker for all participants. All 

participants will only see the selected speakers as the active speakers. This feature is often used to spotlight a keynote speaker.

Prerequisites

• Zoom desktop client for Windows, macOS, or Linux

• Zoom mobile client for Android or iOS

• 2 participants or more sharing video

• (Optional) You can pin a second screen if are you using dual monitor

• Note: Pinning multiple videos requires desktop client version 5.2.2 on Windows or macOS

Windows | macOS

To Pin a Video

1. At the top of your meeting window, hover over the video of the participant you want to pin and click ...

2. From the menu, click Pin. 

3. Optional: If the host wants to pin additional videos (up to 9 total), follow steps 1 & 2 again as needed. 
4. Optional: If you have at least 3 participants in the meeting and dual monitor enabled, you will have the option to pin to your 

first screen or your second screen.

To Cancel a Pin

1. Click Remove Pin in the upper left corner of any video pinned currently. 

2. This will return your view to Active Speaker layout.

Allow Participants to Multi-Pin

By default, only the host or co-host can utilize the multi-pin feature, but either can allow individual participants to multi-pin on their 

video layout.

1. Click Participants along the meeting toolbar. 
2. Hover over the participant, click More, then Allow to Multi-pin. 

3. (Optional) Repeat as needed for other participants. 

Android | iOS

Linux

Link: https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/201362743-Pinning-participants-videos
J. S20015/15 

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 

IN THE INTEREST OF: S.J., A MINOR :

:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF 

PENNSYLVANIA 

APPEAL OF: S.J., :

: No. 707 WDA 2014 

 Appellant :

Appeal from the Order Entered April 3, 2014, 

in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County 

Juvenile Division at Nos. Docket # 98-1653, JID# 50795-A, T178456 

BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., SHOGAN AND WECHT, JJ. 

JUDGMENT ORDER BY FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E.: FILED APRIL 14, 2015 

 S.J. appeals from the order of disposition of April 3, 2014, following his 

adjudication of one count of aggravated indecent assault, 18 Pa.C.S.A. 

§ 3125(a)(1). The charge related to an incident on or about January 19, 

2014, when appellant digitally penetrated the sleeping victim following an 

unsupervised house party. Appellant was placed at Abraxas Secure 

Academy and ordered to comply with the lifetime registration requirements 

of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”), 

42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9799.10 - 9799.41. This timely appeal followed. 

 As the Commonwealth recognizes, in In the Interest of J.B., 107 

A.3d 1 (Pa. 2014), our supreme court held that SORNA’s automatic lifetime 

registration provision violates juvenile offenders’ due process rights by 

utilizing an irrebuttable presumption that all juvenile sexual offenders pose a 

high risk of recidivism. Our supreme court found that the presumption is not 
J. S20015/15 

- 2 - 

universally true and that a reasonable alternative means currently exists for 

determining which juvenile offenders are likely to recidivate. Therefore, the 

court determined that the application of SORNA’s lifetime registration 

provision as applied to juveniles is unconstitutional. 

 Order vacated. Remanded for entry of an order removing appellant 

from SORNA registration. Jurisdiction relinquished. 

Judgment Entered. 

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. 

Prothonotary 

Date: 4/14/2015
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CB Richard Ellis Realty Trust (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Laurie Romanak, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

August 14, 2008
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U. S.
C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Report of MSGI Security Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard J. Mitchell
III, as Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:  November
      15, 2010
            By:
            /s/ Richard
      J. Mitchell, IIIRichard
      J. Mitchell IIIChief
      Accounting Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)




This
certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
such Act, be deemed filed by the small business issuer for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Order entered April 14, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01255-CR

TIMOTHY JAMES FRYAR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 15th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 063988

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s April 13, 2015 request for an extension of time to file 

his pro se response to the Anders brief only to the extent that the pro se response is due by 

MONDAY, MAY 18, 2015. No further extensions will be granted. If the pro se response is not 

received by the date specified, the appeal will be submitted on the Anders brief alone.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first-class mail, to Timothy Fryar, 

TDCJ No. 961774, Moore Unit, 1700 North F.M. 87, Bonham, Texas 75418.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to 

counsel for all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

DEVONTE DENZEL JOHNSON , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 1791

[ March 9, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Scott Suskauer , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2019

- CF

- 011569

- AXXX

- WB

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman,
A ssistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

W ARNER , G ERBER and L EVINE , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 14, 2015

No. 04-15-00089-CV

THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF G.O.R., 

JR.,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-MH-0403

Kelly Cross, Judge Presiding

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order requiring appellant to submit to 

court-ordered medication. The appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed in this appeal on 

March 19, 2015. Appellant’s first motion requesting an extension of time to file the brief was 

granted in part, extending the deadline for filing to brief to April 8, 2015. The brief has not been 

filed.

Appellant’s attorney is appointed to represent the appellant in this appeal. It is therefore 

ORDERED that appellant’s attorney respond to this court in writing no later than April 20, 2015. 

The response should state a reasonable explanation for failing to timely file the brief and 

demonstrate the steps being taken to remedy the deficiency.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-4246

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WALTER LEE MATTISON, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:15-cr-00302-HMH-1)

Submitted: November 7, 2022 Decided: November 16, 2022

Before NIEMEYER, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Benjamin T. Stepp, Assistant Federal Public Defender, OFFICE OF THE 

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Adair F. 

Boroughs, United States Attorney, Winston I. Marosek, Assistant United States Attorney, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-4246 Doc: 20 Filed: 11/16/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Walter Lee Mattison, Jr., appeals the eight-month sentence imposed upon 

revocation of his supervised release. During the pendency of this appeal, Mattison was 

released from incarceration.

“Because mootness is jurisdictional, we can and must consider it even if neither 

party has raised it.” United States v. Ketter, 908 F.3d 61, 65 (4th Cir. 2018). “A case 

becomes moot—and therefore no longer a ‘Case’ or ‘Controversy’ for purposes of Article 

III—when the issues presented are no longer ‘live’ or the parties lack a legally cognizable 

interest in the outcome.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). Because Mattison has 

already served his term of imprisonment and the district court did not impose any additional 

term of supervised release, there is no longer a live controversy regarding the revocation 

sentence. Thus, Mattison’s challenge to the reasonableness of the revocation sentence is 

moot. See United States v. Hardy, 545 F.3d 280, 283-84 (4th Cir. 2008).

We therefore dismiss the appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-4246 Doc: 20 Filed: 11/16/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
#### C. F. Sallas, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error.

(Supreme Court of Florida, *En Banc,*

January 13, 1908).

Writ of Error to Criminal Court of Record, Duval county, John S. Maxwell, Judge.

No appearance for plaintiff in error.

W. H. Ellis, Attorney General, for the state.

This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error. There was judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant takes writ of error. Dismissed on motion of counsel for defendant in error.
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00711-CV

RICHARD J. GONZALES, Appellant

V.

ROBERT DRAKE TERRELL AND HERITAGE PROPERTIES, LP, Appellees

Appeal from the 55th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2008-09906A).

After inspecting the record of the court below, the Court holds that it lacks 

subject-matter jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, the Court dismisses the appeal.

The Court orders that the appellant, Richard J. Gonzales, pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered April 14, 2015.

Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Justices Jennings, Higley, and 

Huddle.
Order entered April 14, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01435-CV

IRINA VALENTINA TREST, Appellant

V.

AH4R-TX2, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 006-1760-2014

ORDER

Although we ordered Collin County Clerk Stacey Kemp to file a clerk’s record 

containing a copy of all contests to appellant’s affidavit of indigence, the clerk’s record that has 

been filed contains no contests. Accordingly, because the record contains no contests, appellant 

is allowed to proceed on appeal without prepayment of costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(f).

We note that by letter dated March 6, 2015, we directed appellant to file, within ten days 

of the letter, verification that she had requested preparation of the reporter’s record. We 

cautioned her that failure to do so could result in the appeal being submitted without that record. 

To date, appellant has not filed the requested verification. Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal 

submitted without the reporter’s record. See id. 37.3(c).
As the clerk’s record has been filed, appellant shall file her brief no later than May 14, 

2015. See id. 38.6(a).

 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
<Page>

             ALLMERICA FINANCIAL LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY

                                 DISCOUNT RIDER


OVERVIEW: This Rider reduces total rider charges when both the Enhanced Earnings
Rider (EER) and an Enhanced Death Benefit Rider (EDB) are in effect.

APPLICABILITY: This Rider is made a part of the contract to which it is attached
and is effective on the issue date.

DISCOUNT: If both the Enhanced Earnings Rider (EER) and an Enhanced Death
Benefit Rider (EDB) are in effect, total rider charges will be reduced on a
contract monthly basis by an amount equal to 1/12th of an annual percentage rate
of .05% times the Accumulated Value of the contract on that date. The discount
shall only apply while both the EER Rider and an EDB Rider are in effect.

TERMINATION:  This Rider will terminate on the earliest of the following:

       (a)  when either the EER Rider or EDB Rider terminates; or

       (b)  surrender of the contract.



                    Signed for the Company at Dover, Delaware


        /s/ [ILLEGIBLE]                                /s/ [ILLEGIBLE]

           President                                      Secretary
**Exhibit31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Randall K. Gausman, certify that:

 

1.                                       I have reviewed this Form 10-Q/AAmendment No.2 of Tut Systems, Inc.;

 

2.                                       Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: September 2, 2004

 

* *
| * * | * * | *By:*    | */s/ Randall K. Gausman*                                                                                           |
|----------|----------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| * * | * * | * * | *Randall K. Gausman,*                                                                                              |
| * * | * * | * * | *Vice-President, Finance and Administration,  Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial Officer)* |

 

----
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Bullion Monarch Mining, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending April 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, R. Don Morris, President and Philip Manning, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Date:September 15, 2009By:/s/R. Don MorrisR. Don MorrisPresident and DirectorDate:September 15, 2009By:/s/Philip ManningPhilip ManningChief Financial Officer
Proposed label
BCS Cry2Ae Cotton 

INSECT RESISTANT COTTON SEED 

Insect-resistant cotton seed that produces an insecticidal protein Cry2Ae from 

Bacillus thuringiensis. For control of Cotton Bollworm, Tobacco Budworm, Pink 

Bollworm, Fall Armyworm, and Beet Armyworm.

Active Ingredient: 

Bacillus thuringiensis Cry2Ae protein and the genetic material (from plasmid pTEM12) necessary 

for its production in Event GHB119 cotton (BCS-GHØØ5-8)..................0.001491 – 0.005217%*

Inert Ingredient:

Substance produced by a herbicide tolerance gene and its controlling sequences (from plasmid 

pTEM12) necessary for its production in Event GHB119 cotton (BCS-GHØØ5-8)....................

....................................................................................................0.003456 – 0.008329%*

______________________________________________________________________________________

* Percentage (wt/wt) on a dry weight basis as expressed in whole cotton plants.

KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN 

CAUTION

EPA REGISTRATION NUMBER: 264-RNOL

EPA ESTABLISHMENT NUMBER: 000264-TX-004

Bayer CropScience

2 T.W. Alexander Dr.

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
DIRECTIONS FOR USE

It is a violation of federal law to use this product in any manner inconsistent with its labeling.

This plant-incorporated protectant may be combined through conventional breeding with other 

registered plant-incorporated protectants that are similarly approved for use in combination, 

through conventional breeding, with other plant-incorporated protectants to produce inbred cotton 

lines and hybrid cotton varieties with combined pesticidal traits.

No commercial planting of this product is permitted south of Route 60 in Florida.

Commercial planting of this product is prohibited in Hawaii, Puerto Rico and the US Virgin 

Islands.

Bt cotton is not permitted to be planted in the following counties of the Texas panhandle: Dallam, 

Sherman, Hansford, Ochiltree, Lipscomb, Hartley, Moore, Hutchinson, Roberts and Carlson.

USE PATTERN

CROP PESTS

Cotton Cotton Bollworm

Tobacco Budworm

Pink Bollworm

Beet Armyworm

EPA Accepted: __/__/__
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Felicia Nicole Jones v. Macy’s, Eric Limbocker, Citibank, and 

Houston Federal Credit Union

Appellate case number: 01-14-00143-CV

Trial court case number: 74030

Trial court: 239th District Court of Brazoria County

It is ordered that Appellant’s Motions for Reconsideration En Banc, filed March 18, 2015 

and March 20, 2015, are denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting for the En Banc Court*

Date: April 9, 2015

*En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, 

Massengale, Brown, Huddle, and Lloyd.
2022 IDAHO-EASTERN OREGON POTATO COMMITTEE ROSTER 

 

MANAGER: 

Travis Blacker

Idaho-Eastern Oregon Potato Committee

3670 South 25th Street East, Suite 3

Idaho Falls, Idaho 83404

Phone: (208) 529-8057

Fax: (208) 514-4237

MEMBERS TERM ENDS ALTERNATES TERM ENDS

Producer Representatives

District 1 

Laura Pickard 2024 Vacancy

Ashton, ID

Mike Huskinson 2024 Jason Webster 2024

Rexburg, ID Rexburg, ID

Jaren Raybould 2023 Eric Sutton 2023

St. Anthony, ID Rexburg, ID

District 2 

Dillon Van Orden 2024 Jeffery Van Orden 2024

Blackfoot, ID Pingree, ID

District 3 

Brian D. Hansen 2023 R. Gregg Poteet 2023

Rupert, ID Rupert, ID

Handler Representatives

District 1 

Brooke Holverson 2024 Trever Belnap 2024

Idaho Falls, ID Lewisville, ID
District 2 

Ryan Bybee 2023 Mark Thompson 2023

Shelley, ID Blackfoot, ID

District 3 

Ty Erling 2024 Tyler Banta 2024

Paul, ID Rupert, ID