alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
APPLICANT JOSE JESUS CONTRERAS MONREAL APPLICATION NO. WR-82.913-01

APPLICATION FOR 11.07 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ACTION TAKEN

DENIED WITHOUT WRITTEN ORDER.

JUDGE

ffelts'

DATE
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105 - 2498 **ME MORA**  **NDUM** SUBJECT: Heavy- Duty Hy brid Onboard Diagnostics FROM: Am y Kopin TO: The Docket DATE: July

25, 2011 

### On July 7 th 

### , 2011 we held a meeting in Ann Arbor, MI with the Hy brid Manufacturers Regulatory

Collaboration ( HMRC ) to discuss con cerns raised by members of the HMRC regarding heavy - duty

onboard diagnostic (OBD) requirements and timing . C oncern s were raised during the comment period for the heavy- duty greenhouse gas notice of proposed rulemaking that heavy - duty

hy brid applications m ay not be able to meet the 2013 heavy- duty OBD regulations that were published in the 2009 OBD Final Rulemaking. 1 , 2 

### Specifically , they have requested a delay of the application of HD OBD requirements for hy brid applications until 2020. Attendees from the EPA and HMRC are shown below. **Attendee Affiliation**  Cleophas Jackson EPA

– Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division Anthony Neam EPA

– Assessment and Standards Division Amy Kopin EPA

– Assessment and Standards Division Barbara Chance Allison Tran smission Ian McKenzie Eaton Corporation Derek Matthews BAE Sy stems Jim Lyons Sierra Research

1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium and Heavy - Duty Engines and Vehicles,” republished Dec ember 29, 2010. Available here: http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR - 2010 - 12 - 29/html/2010 - 32726.htm 2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Engines; Final Rule Regulations Requiring Onboard Diagnostic System s on 2010 and Later Heavy - Duty Engines Used in Highway Applications Over 14,000 Pounds; Revisions to Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy - Duty Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds ,” published February 24, 2009. Available here: http://www.epa.g ov/otaq/regs/im/obd/regtech/hd - obd - frm - 02 - 24 - 09 - notice - 74 - fr - 8310.pdf OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
Estimating Pesticide 

Handler Exposure

HSRB Meeting – Potomac Yard, Arlington VA

U.S. EPA, Office of Pesticide Programs 

William Jordan

January 17, 2013

1
Statutory Framework

 EPA regulates pesticides under FIFRA

 FIFRA requires registration of all 

pesticides sold in the US

 Each product has a defined 

composition, labeling, and packaging

2
Pesticide Product – Registration Terms

 Composition – defined by a Confidential Statement of 

Formula (percentage of active and inert ingredients; 

type of formulation, e.g., liquid, granules, wetable

powder, etc.)

 Labeling – use directions (site, target pests, method 

of mixing, loading, application; application rate, 

timing, and frequency; personal protective 

equipment; warnings; limitations (e.g., REI, PHI, 

plant back), etc.

 Packaging – container size, composition, other 

characteristics

3
Statutory Standard

 EPA may register a pesticide if it will not 

cause “unreasonable adverse effects on the 

environment”

 This standard is defined in a way that directs 

EPA to balance the risks of using a pesticide 

against its benefits

 Risk is a function of toxicity and exposure

4
Types of Risks Considered

 EPA considers a wide range of potential 

risks – human health and environmental

 For human health, EPA considers 

occupational, dietary, bystander, 

residential risks

 Occupational risks includes handlers 

and workers

5
Handler Exposure

Handler exposure depends on three factors: 

 How the particular pesticide is mixed, loaded, and 

applied – unit exposure for a handling scenario 

(mg active ingredient / amount of active ingredient 

handled (AaiH)

 How much of the pesticide is handled – AaiH

 The impact of using personal protective equipment 

(PPE)

6
Data sources for estimating 

occupational exposure 

 Unit exposure – studies with surrogate chemicals 

measuring inhalation & dermal exposure of 

handlers’ body parts, when performing scenario 

tasks (mg active ingredient/AaiH)

 AaiH – data on pesticide product composition, 

product application rate, and high end quantities 

handled during a work period

 Impact of PPE – studies of protection

7
8

Historical Background

“In estimating exposure for a pesticide application from a surrogate 

study, it has been our experience that the proper (and logical) 

conversion factors are amounts of pesticide applied for applicators 

and the quantity of chemical handled by mixer/loaders.” (Reinart, 

J.C. and D.J. Severn, 1985; pg 361)

Reinart, J.C. and D.J. Severn, 1985; pg 360
9

Proportionality Analysis Discussion

 Practicality of estimating handler exposure 

using unit exposure values together with data 

on AaiH

 Potential Error from assuming proportionality

 May underestimate @ lower AaiH

 May overestimate exposure @ higher AaiH

 From a policy perspective, this type of error is 

acceptable
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1057 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for a code of conduct 

for justices and judges of the courts of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2019 

Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia (for himself, Mrs. BEATTY, Mr. BEYER, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania, Ms. BROWNLEY of 

California, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. CASTEN of Illinois, Mr. 

CICILLINE, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. COHEN, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. 

COOPER, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. DESAULNIER, Mr. ENGEL, 

Ms. ESHOO, Mr. FOSTER, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HASTINGS, Ms. JACKSON

LEE, Ms. JAYAPAL, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. KILMER, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. TED LIEU of California, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. LUJA ́N, Mr. 

MCGOVERN, Ms. MOORE, Mr. MOULTON, Ms. MUCARSEL-POWELL, Mr. 

NADLER, Ms. NORTON, Mr. PASCRELL, Ms. PINGREE, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. 

SARBANES, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. SMITH

of Washington, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Mr. TAKANO, 

Mr. TONKO, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. WELCH, and Mr. YARMUTH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for a 

code of conduct for justices and judges of the courts 

of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1057 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supreme Court Ethics 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CODE OF CONDUCT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 57 of title 28, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘§ 964. Code of conduct 

9 ‘‘Not later than 1 year after the date of the enact10 ment of this section, the Judicial Conference of the United 

11 States shall issue a code of conduct, which applies to each 

12 justice and judge of the courts of the United States, except 

13 that the code of conduct may include provisions that are 

14 applicable only to certain categories of judges or justices.’’. 

15 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

16 The table of sections for chapter 57 of title 28, United 

17 States Code, is amended by adding after the item related 

18 to section 963 the following: 

‘‘964. Code of conduct.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
MOORE
& ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED
 ACCOUNTANTS AND
ADVISORS
 PCAOB
REGISTERED
 
 
 
 
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 
 We
consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10-K of Secured Diversified
Investment, Ltd. of our report dated February 20, 2009 on our audit of the
consolidated financial statements of Secured Diversified Investment, Ltd. as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then
ended.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 /s/ Moore & Associates,
Chartered
 Moore
& Associates Chartered
 Las
Vegas, Nevada
 March 31,
2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 6490 West Desert Inn Road,
Las Vegas, NV 89146 (702)253-7499 Fax
(702)253-7501
ex_384351.htm


Exhibit 4.14


 


 





 


 


November 3, 2020


 


Rosemina Merchant.


2 Bloor St. W, 7th Floor


Toronto, ON    M4W 3E2


 


Dear Rosemina,


 


We are asking you to agree to certain changes to the written employment agreement dated January 1, 2013 as amended March 1, 2015, October 1, 2016 and September 21, 2017 (your "Employment Agreement") a copy of which is enclosed with this amendment letter).


 


We have set out the changes that will be made to the terms of your Employment Agreement, below. Please sign and return this document to indicate your acceptance of these changes. Once you have accepted the changes, this document will constitute an official amendment to the terms of your Employment Agreement.


 


	 	
			1.

				
			Change to your Base Salary - Section 3.1(a) will be modified to reflect your new Base Salary of Cdn $295,000 which is effective as of April 1, 2020.

			
	 	 	 
	 	 	Addition of 3.1(d) – Retirement Contribution – Effective April 1, 2020 the Company will annually deposit $26,000 to an RRSP account of the Executive’s choosing by February 28th of the following year (i.e. February 28, 2021)



 


	 	
			2.

				
			Changes to your Bonus Structure – Section 3.3 will be modified to reflect your new bonus rate of 40 percent effective April 1, 2020.

			
	 	 	 
	 	Finally, all other terms and conditions of your Employment Agreement shall remain the same.



 


Thank you for taking the time to carefully consider this letter. Please return a signed copy at your earliest convenience. In the meantime, if you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.


 


Yours Sincerely,


Medicenna Therapeutics


 


Signed: /s/ Elizabeth Williams                          


 


I hereby agree to amend the terms and conditions of my Employment Agreement, as described above. All remaining terms and conditions of my employment will remain in effect, unchanged by this consent.


 


	
			Signed: /s/ Rosemina Merchant                        


			             Rosemina Merchant

				
			Date:   December 10, 2020
Chase Carmen Hunter

340 S Lemon Ave #9039 :: Walnut, CA 91789

Tel: (707) 706-3647 :: Fax: (703) 997-5999

Email: Chase_Hunter@yahoo.com

April 6, 2015

Velva Price

Travis County Texas District Court Clerk

1000 Guadalupe

Austin, TX 78701

Via e-file

RE: Travis County District Court case D-1-GN-13-001957 and Third Court of Appeals case

03-13--00737-cv

Ms. Price:

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c)(1) and Texas Gov’t Code Section

522 et seq., I request that you prepare, certify, and file a supplemental record in the

above-referenced case that includes all copies of the following correspondence:

1. Mailing envelopes in which your office received documents for filing in this

above-referenced case;

2. Written correspondence your office received from Chase Carmen Hunter, including but

not limited to, emails, facsimiles, and electronic communications received via the electronic

filing system that were received in the above-referenced case and related case

D-1-GN-13-002576;

3. Written correspondence sent by you or someone in your office to Chase Carmen Hunter,

including but not limited to emails, facsimiles, and electronic communications sent via the

electronic filing system that were sent in the above-referenced case and related case

D-1-GN-13-002576;

4. Written correspondence to your office regarding Chase Carmen Hunter that is not

requested above that was not a document to be filed by any of the parties;

5. Written correspondence from your office regarding Chase Carmen Hunter that is not

requested above that was not a document to be filed by any of the parties;

6. Your written explanation why your first filing of the record in the above-referenced case

was not complete and did not include the June 24, 2014, Notice of Court Setting, and the

July 12, 2013, letter from clerk; both of which were requested by Cynthia Morales on

March 30, 2015.

Thank you,

/s/ Chase Carmen Hunter

Chase Carmen Hunter

ACCEPTED

03-14-00737-CV

4770324

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/6/2015 12:53:16 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/6/2015 12:53:16 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.49


                            AMENDMENT NUMBER 3 TO THE

     AUTOMATIC FLEXIBLE PREMIUM VARIABLE LIFE REINSURANCE AGREEMENT NUMBER 3
                         (REFERRED TO AS THE AGREEMENT)

                                     BETWEEN

                   WESTERN RESERVE LIFE ASSURANCE CO. OF OHIO
                             ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA
                         (REFERRED TO AS THE REINSURED)

                                       AND

                           GLOBAL PREFERRED RE LIMITED
                   (F/K/A WMA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED)
                                HAMILTON, BERMUDA
                         (REFERRED TO AS THE REINSURER)


                            Effective January 1, 2002


Pursuant to the terms and conditions of Automatic Flexible Premium Variable Life
Reinsurance Agreement No. 2 and this Agreement, all policies and riders issued
from April 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001 and reinsured under this Agreement,
shall be converted to Automatic Flexible Premium Variable Life Reinsurance
Agreement No. 2 on a twenty percent (20%) quota share basis.

Except as expressed herein, all terms, covenants and provisions of this
Agreement, as amended, that are not in conflict with the provisions of this
Amendment Number 3 shall remain unaltered and in full force and effect.

In Witness Whereof, the Reinsured and the Reinsurer, by their respective
officers have executed this amendment in duplicate at the dates and places
indicated.


WESTERN RESERVE LIFE ASSURANCE            GLOBAL PREFERRED RE LIMITED
CO. OF OHIO

at St. Petersburg, Florida                at Duluth, Georgia
  ----------------------------------      -----------------------------------
on March 28, 2002                         on March 28, 2002

By: /s/ Larry Kirkland                    By: /s/ Edward McKernan
   ---------------------------------         --------------------------------
Title:  Vice President/                   Title:  Chief Executive Officer/
        Managing Actuary                          President

By: /s/Stephanie J. Harder                By:
    --------------------------------         --------------------------------
Title:  Staff Actuary                     Title:
144

MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT

DISPOSITIONS

( P3d )

CERTIFIED QUESTIONS, CERTIFIED APPEALS,

MANDAMUS PROCEEDINGS, AND OTHER MATTERS

April 9, 2015

Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation v. Seabold Construction Company, Inc. 

(S062915). Alternative writ of mandamus issued. 

Oregon State Hospital v. Butts (S063003). Alternative writ of mandamus issued.
UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T H . W . e t a l., P l ai n t i ffs - A p p el l an t s, v. L ON G B E AC H U NI F I E D S C HO OL DI ST RI CT , D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 11- 55595 D . C . N o. 2: 10 -c v-07 01 5-S JO -E C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f

C a lif o rn ia , L os A ng el es ORDER

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S . J a m e s O t e r o, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d A ugus t7, 2012 P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: R E IN H A R D T , S IL V E R M A N , an d W A R D L A W , C i rcu i tJu d g es. W e r em and thi s c as e t o the di stri ctcourti n l i gh tof P a y n e v . P e n in s u la Scho olD istri ct , 65 3 F . 3d 86 3 (9th C i r. 20 11 ), a dec i si on i ss ued aft erthe di stri ct c ourte nt e r e d i t s or de r . W e he l d i n P ayne thatthe Indi vi du al s w i th D i sabi l i t i es E du ca t i on A ct ’ s e xh aust i on re qu i re m ent , 20 U . S . C . § 1 41 5(l ), i s notj uri sdi ct i on al a nd s e tf orth ane w r e l i e f

- ba s e d appr oa c h, a s oppos e d t o a n i nj ury - ba s e d appr oa c h, for det erm i ni ng w hether acl ai m i s s ubj ec tt o the exhaust i on re qu i re m ent . In c onf orm i ty w i th P ay ne , the D e f e nda ntm a y f

i l e a n une num e r a t e d R ul e 12( b)



# FI LED AU G 23 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSm ot i on f

orf a i l ur e t o e xhaus ti n pl a c e of i t s m ot i on t o di s m i s s f

orl a c k of ju risd icti o n . P lain ti ff

s s h all b e a ff

o rd ed th e o p p o rtu n ity to re sp o n d to D ef en d an t’ s m o tio n . RE MAND E D. I T I S S O O RD E RE D.
OMB No. 0581-0178

F/H Form F(4) (Exp. 3/31/2024) Destroy previous editions.

HAZELNUT MARKETING BOARD

21595-A Dolores Way NE

Aurora, OR 97002-9738

Tel: (503) 678-6823; Fax: (503) 678-6825

HANDLER BALLOT

POSITIONS 1-3

The _____________________________________________________ hereby nominates:

Member: _____________________________________________________________________________

Alternate Member: _____________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________

Signature

_______________________________________

Date

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a 

collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0581-

0178. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 3 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing 

instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of 

information.

In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its 

Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on 

race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, 

family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in 

any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by 

program or incident.

Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American 

Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA 

through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. 

To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at 

http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of 

the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to 

USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights 1400 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, 

employer, and lender.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1110 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1110

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
  include an additional permissible use of amounts provided as grants 
          under the Byrne JAG program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2019

  Mrs. Hartzler (for herself, Ms. Bass, Mr. Clay, Mr. Chabot, and Mr. 
   Stauber) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
  include an additional permissible use of amounts provided as grants 
          under the Byrne JAG program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Empowering Law Enforcement to Fight 
Sex Trafficking Demand Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZED USE OF BYRNE JAG FUNDS.

    Section 501(a)(1) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act 
of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10152(a)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
                    ``(I) Programs to combat human trafficking 
                (including programs to reduce the demand for trafficked 
                persons).''.
                                 <all>
```
FILED IN5th COURT OF APPEALS        DALLAS, TEXAS4/13/2015 10:41:10 AM            LISA MATZ                Clerk

- NOTICE
- MTN RVK
- PLEA
- ORDER
- ORDER2
- RTA
- JMT
EPA Registration Jacket 432-1478 

Vol.2 
1
2
3
4
5

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
6

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
7

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
8

*Description of the product manufacturing process on pages 8 through 16 is not included in this copy*
17

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
18

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
*Pages 19 through 23 contain FIFRA registration data and are not included in this copy*
24
25
26
27
28

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
29

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
30

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
31
32
33
34
35
36

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
37

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
38

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
39
40
41

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
42

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
43

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
44
45
46

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
47

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
48

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
49
50
51
52

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
53

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
54

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
55

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
*Pages 110 through 134 contain FIFRA registration data and are not included in this copy*
135
*Pages 136 through 138 contain the product confidential statement of formula and are not included in this copy*