alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Action Industries, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending June 30, 2008, I, Stephanie Passalaqua, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  July 17, 2008 Action Industries, Inc. By:  /s/ Stephanie Passalaqua Stephanie Passalaqua  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Action Industries, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending June 30, 2008, I, Inna Sheveleva, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  July 17, 2008 Action Industries, Inc. By:  /s/ Inna Sheveleva Inna Sheveleva
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9546]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Invasive Species Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meetings of the Invasive Species Advisory 
Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, notice is hereby given of meetings of the Invasive Species 
Advisory Committee (ISAC). Comprised of 30 nonfederal invasive species 
experts and stakeholders from across the nation, the purpose of the 
Advisory Committee is to provide advice to the National Invasive 
Species Council, as authorized by Executive Order 13112, on a broad 
array of issues related to preventing the introduction of invasive 
species and providing for their control and minimizing the economic, 
ecological, and human health impacts that invasive species cause. The 
Council is co-chaired by the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary 
of Agriculture, and the Secretary of Commerce. The duty of the Council 
is to provide national leadership regarding invasive species issues.
    Purpose of Meeting: The meeting will be held on May 22-24, 2012 in 
Portland, Oregon, and will focus primarily on invasive species in the 
Pacific Northwest. A ``systems thinking'' approach to this meeting in 
both ecological and management contexts, will center on topics that: 
(1) Pertain to invasive species issues at the community and ecosystem 
level; or that, (2) holistically address prevention, eradication, 
control and restoration activities within the region. A copy of the 
meeting agenda is available on the NISC Web site, 
www.invasivespecies.gov.

DATES: Meeting of the Invasive Species Advisory Committee: Tuesday, May 
22, 2012 and Thursday, May 24, 2012; beginning at approximately 8 a.m., 
and ending at approximately 5 p.m. each day. Members will be 
participating in an off-site field tour on Wednesday, May 23, 2012. The 
field tour is closed to the public.

ADDRESSES: The Benson Hotel, 309 SW Broadway, Portland, Oregon 97205. 
The general session on May 22, 2012 and May 24, 2012 will be held in 
the Crystal Ballroom.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelsey Brantley, National Invasive 
Species Council Program Specialist and ISAC Coordinator, (202) 513-
7243; Fax: (202) 371-1751.

    Dated: April 16, 2012.
Lori C. Williams,
Executive Director, National Invasive Species Council.
[FR Doc. 2012-9546 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P
Subject: FW: Odds Ratio from your 2011 paper in EHP

Date: Monday, April 08, 2013 9:21:30 AM

From: Ebba Malmqvist [ mailto:ebba.malmqvist@med.lu.se ]

Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 8:12 AM

To: Luben, Tom

Subject: SV: Odds Ratio from your 2011 paper in EHP

Hi Dr. Luben,

The corresponding Odds Ratio for baby boys were (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.91, 1.13).

If you are interested we have a new publication on the subject:

http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/121 -a136/ News section

http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/1205736/ Article

Please let me know if I can be of further assistance.

Best regards, Ebba Malmqvist

Från: Luben, Tom [ mailto:Luben.Tom@epa.gov ]

Skickat: den 4 april 2013 16:37

Till: Ebba.Malmqvist@med.lu.se Ämne: Odds Ratio from your 2011 paper in EHP

Hi Dr. Malmqvist

,

I am reviewing the literature on the association between exposure to NOx and reproductive and

developmental outcomes to support the next review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards

(NAAQS). The identification of potentially at -risk populations is especially important. In your

paper, Maternal Exposure to Air Pollution and Birth Outcomes (EHP 119(4) 2011), you report that

the association between exposure to NOx during the third trimester of pregnancy is associated

with SGA among mother who did not change their residence during pregnancy (OR 1.09, 95% CI

1.01, 1.18). When stratifying by sex, the effect estimate was higher for baby girls (OR 1.12, 95% CI

1.01, 1.24). I was hoping that you would be able to send me the corresponding effect estimate for

baby boys; I was unable to locate this result in the paper.

Your collaboration would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you,

Tom Luben, PhDNational Center for Environmental Assessment

Office of Research and Development

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

RTP, NC 27711

(919) 541-5762
TERRY ALLEN ADKISON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3751

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 7, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Adrian G. Soud, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jessica DaSilva, Assistant Attorney General 

and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
ACCEPTED

03-11-00807-CV

4882023

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/14/2015 1:53:01 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

NO. 03-11-00807-CV 

IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS 

JANOS FARKAS, 

Appellant 

v. 

SECOND CONGRESS, LTD 

Appellee 

APPEAL FROM THE 261'' DISTRICT COURT 

TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS 

TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-10-003632 

AGREEMENT TO DISMISS 

Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2) and 18.1(c), Appellant Janos Farkas 

and Appellee Second Congress, Ltd. (collectively "Parties", individually "Party") 

respectfully state: 

1. This appeal is from the judgment entered in Cause No. D-1-GN -10-003632, in 

the 261" District Court, Travis County, Texas on August 11, 2011 

("underlying case"). 

2. Appellant timely appealed and this appellate Court issued a memorandum 

opinion on this and two related appeals on April 25, 2014. 

AGREEMENT TO DISMISS 

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/14/2015 1:53:01 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
3. Appellant filed a motion for rehearing on July 11, 2014. No decision has been 

rendered by the Court on Appellant's motion for rehearing. 

4. The Parties have since entered into a settlement agreement concerning the 

underlying case and related proceedings and seek to dismiss the cause. 

5. The Parties request that costs be assessed against the Party that incurred them. 

6. The Parties do not request that the mandate issue early. 

For these reasons and by agreement of the Parties as evidenced by the 

signatures of their counsel below, the Parties request the Court grant an Order 

dismissing the cause and taxing the costs of appeal against the party incurring 

them.

1 

SBN: 00784367 

SA VRICK SCHUMANN JOHNSON 

MCGARR KAMINSKI & SHIRLEY, LLP 

The Overlook at Gaines Ranch 

4330 Gaines Ranch Loop, Suite 150 

Austin, Texas 78735 

(512) 347-1604 (TEL) 

(512) 347-1676 (FAX) 

bob@ssjmlaw.com 

Attorneys for Appellee Second 

Congress, Ltd. 

~2SBN: 

avid 

24014089 

A. Rogers :;--~ LAW OFFICE OF DAVID ROGERS 

120 1 Spyglass, Suite 100 

Austin, Texas 78746 

(512) 923-1836 (TEL) 

(512) 201-4082 (FAX) 

darogers@aol.com 

Mr. William B. Gammon 

SBN: 07611280 

Gammon Law Office, P.L.L.C. 

1201 Spyglass Drive, Suite 100 

1 Dismissal of related cause 03-14-00108-CV is being sought by separate pleading/motion. 

AGREEMENT TO DISMISS 2 
AGREEMENT TO DISMISS 

Austin, TX 78746 

(512) 472-8909 (TEL) 

(888) 545-4279 (FAX) 

billgammon@mac.com 

Attorneys for Appellant Janos Farkas 

3 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served in 

accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 9.5 and Local Rule 4 in the manner indicated 

below on April14, 2015: 

Attorney for Appellee 

Robert L. Kaminski (viae-serve) 

SAvRICK ScHuMANN JoHNSON McGARR KAMINSKI & SHIRLEY, LLP 

The Overlook at Gaines Ranch 

4330 Gaines Ranch Loop, Suite 150 

Austin, Texas 78735 

Is/ 

~~~ David A. Rogers 

David A. Rogers 

AGREEMENT TO DISMISS 4
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**SENECA GAMING CORPORATIONCERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE OFFICERS**

 

(Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Seneca Gaming Corporation, or SGC, on Form 10-Q forthe fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission, we, Brian Hansberry, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer, and Patrick M. Fox, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                      TheQuarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,; and

 

2.                                      Theinformation contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operation of SGC as of, andfor, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SGC andwill be retained by SGC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its Staff upon request.

 

February 14, 2008

 
| /s/ E. Brian Hansberry                |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| E. Brian Hansberry                    |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |   |
|                                  |   |
|                                  |   |
| /s/ Patrick M. Fox                    |   |
| Patrick M. Fox                        |   |
| Chief Financial Officer               |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer)         |   |

 

The forgoingcertification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuantto Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as partof the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into anyfiling of SGC, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing.

 

 

 

----
July 1, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KRISTIN WILKINSON, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00111-CV V.

USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK TRUST SERVICES, INDIVIDUALLY, 

AND AS TRUSTEE, WILLIAMS, KHERKHER, HART & BOUNDAS, L.L.P., 

LOOPER REED & MCGRAW, P.C., AND WILLIAM W. MORRIS, Appellees

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the summary judgment in favor of appellees, 

USAA Federal Savings Bank Trust Services, Individually, and as Trustee,

Williams, Kherkher, Hart & Boundas, L.L.P., Looper Reed & McGraw, P.C., and 

William W. Morris, signed November 6, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the 

record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order 

the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant Kristin Wilkinson to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 10.10
 FIFTH AMENDMENT
TO THE SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT
 SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT
 NOW, THEREFORE,
 1.
    
    The following provision of Subsection (iii) of (c) of Section 1: Sale and Purchase of Securities; Closing shall be deleted in its entirety:
    2.
    
    The following provision of Subsection (g) of Section 4: Purchase obligation shall be deleted in its entirety:




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS ALLIANCE, INC.By:
    /s/ Daniel A. CacchioneName:
    Daniel A. CacchioneTitle:
    Senior Vice President and
Chief Underwriting Officer
 SPECIALTY RISK SOLUTIONS, LLCBy:
    Scott KellerName:
    Scott H. KellerTitle:
    Managing Director
# Spyder Assembly instructions 

# You’ve never been so close to be a Hero ... Kits SKH00-401, SKH00-402 & SKH00-403

Assembly instructions Spyder / Kits SKH00-401, SKH00-402 & SKH00-403 / Page 1 /5

## 1 Mount de 5 frame-spacers. Screws used: PT 2,9*13mm

- 

## 2 Mount de 2 landing gear holders. Screws used: M3*10mm + M3 locknut PT 3*10mm **Tip :** Glue de screw in place on your frame for later easy gear holder replacement... 

## 3 Mount de 5 silent blocks. Screws used: M4*10mm round head

- 

## 4 Mount your motors on motor holders. **Tip :** Use the screws provided with your motor and add some threadlock


## 5 Connect your ESC to your motors. **Tip :** Check your cable lenght depending on your frame size and flight controller. Check your motor rotation depending on your flight controller recommendations.
Assembly instructions Spyder / Kits SKH00-401, SKH00-402 & SKH00-403 / Page 2 /5

## 6 Mount 2 motor holders on each arms. Screws used: M3*10mm + M3 locknuts **Tip :** Align the centering pins from your motor holders with the arms holes.

- 

## 7
Insert the arms insert on each arm.

- 

## 8 Mount the 4 arms on your frames. Screws used: M4*40mm cone head +Knuckel **Tip :** Use only the inner hole, with knuckle on top, this is just a blank mounting. 

## 9 Place your flight controller and RX, route all your cables. **Tip :** The center of your frame is the hole... Use the 45 * 45 mm pattern for suitable flight controllers. 

## 10 Mount the canopy standoff on upper main frame. Screws used: M4*10mm

Assembly instructions Spyder / Kits SKH00-401, SKH00-402 & SKH00-403 / Page 3 /5

## 11 Remove the knuckles and mount the upper frame. Use M4*40mm buttonhead in rear outer hole for fixing canopy standof. Screws used: PT 2,9*13mm, M4*40mm cone head + knuckel, M4*40mm buttonhead

- 

## 12 Remove the 4 first M4*40 screws, mount them in the right direction. Screws used: M4 locknuts + M4 shims

- 

## 12 TIP **Tip :** Use the correct hole depending on your frame size.



## 13 Mount your inertic plate. Screws used: M4 red knuckle

Assembly instructions Spyder / Kits SKH00-401, SKH00-402 & SKH00-403 / Page 4 /5

## 14 Mount your landing leg, landing poles and landing caps. Screws used: M3*16mm + M3 locknuts **Tip :** Check the for correct logo orientation

- 

## 15 Screw the quick release nut on landing gear holder and slide legs into it. **Tip :** Do not over tight the nut and never tight it with no leg into it

- 

## 16 Drill a 8mm hole in your canopy and glue the grommet holder in place. **Tip :** Drill first a small hole, and use a reamer to get the right size, use thich CA glue


## 17 Mount the grommet into holder, fix the canopy with the body clip.

Assembly instructions Spyder / Kits SKH00-401, SKH00-402 & SKH00-403 / Page 5 /5
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

CODY INGRAHAM,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-30199

D.C. No. 6:09-cr-00003-CCL

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Charles C. Lovell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 7, 2015**

Before: FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Cody Ingraham appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges 

the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Ingraham contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 15 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-30199

his history of substance abuse and request for substance abuse treatment. The 

district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Ingraham’s sentence. See 

Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The sentence is substantively 

reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors and the totality of 

the circumstances, including Ingraham’s history of violating supervised release and 

the need to protect the public. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51. 

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 21

          Subsidiaries.
     280

<PAGE>
Subsidiaries

The subsidiaries of Brenton Banks, Inc., their location, the jurisdiction in
which they are incorporated or organized, and the names under which
subsidiaries do business are:

Name Under which Subsidiary                               Jurisdiction in
Does Business and Location                             which Incorporated or
           of Subsidiary                                     Organized

     Banks

Brenton Savings Bank, FSB                                 United States
Ames, Iowa

Brenton Bank                                              Iowa
Des Moines, Iowa


   Non-Bank Subsidiaries

Brenton Investments, Inc.                                 Iowa
Des Moines, Iowa

Brenton Insurance Services, Inc.                          Iowa
Des Moines, Iowa

Brenton Mortgages, Inc.                                   Iowa
Des Moines, Iowa

Brenton Insurance Inc.                                    Iowa
Adel, Iowa

Brenton Realty Services, Ltd.                             Iowa
Marshalltown, Iowa

Brenton Savings Financial Services, Inc.                  Iowa
Ames, Iowa
     281
y

MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00865-CV

HARRY W. STURGES, Appellant

V.

SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Galveston County. (Tr. Ct. No. 

CV-0071918).

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF GALVESTON COUNTY, 

GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 10th day of February, 2015, the cause upon appeal to 

revise or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these 

words:

After due consideration, the Court grants the motion to 

dismiss the appeal filed by the appellant, Harry W. Sturges. 

Accordingly, the Court dismisses the appeal.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.
Judgment rendered February 10, 2015.

Judgment rendered by panel consisting of Chief Justice Radack and Justices

Brown and Lloyd.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

April 10, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
1

Eric H. Holder, Jr., has been appointed to serve as Attorney General of the

United States, and is substituted as respondent pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate

Procedure 43(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-1046

___________

Hayad Ahmed Guure; Salma Ciise *

Liban; Yahia Ciise Liban; Zubeer *

Ciise Liban, *

*

Petitioners, *

* Petition for Review of

v. * an Order of the Board

* of Immigration Appeals.

Eric H. Holder, Jr.,1

 Attorney General *

of the United States, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Respondent. *

___________

Submitted: June 4, 2009

Filed: June 8, 2009

___________

Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Hayad Ahmed Guure and her children petition for review of an order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying their motion to reopen. In particular,

petitioners challenge the BIA’s refusal to reopen sua sponte the removal proceedings,
2

To the extent petitioners intended to challenge the remainder of the BIA’s

decision denying the motion to reopen, we agree with the BIA that the motion was

untimely, and petitioners failed to show they met any exception to the time limitation.

See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) (time limitation); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)

(exceptions); Ghasemimehr v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 1160, 1162-63 (8th Cir. 2005) (per

curiam) (BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying untimely motion to reopen). 

-2-

so that petitioners could reapply for asylum on the basis of female genital mutilation.

We lack jurisdiction, however, to review a BIA’s decision not to invoke its sua sponte

authority to reopen removal proceedings. See Tamenut v. Mukasey, 521 F.3d 1000,

1001, 1004-05 (8th Cir. 2008) (en banc) (per curiam).2

Accordingly, we deny the petition.

______________________________