alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June 28 , 2011

MEMORANDUM

TO: Air and Radiation Docket EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 20 11
- 0542

SUBJECT: Supplemental Information for Renewable Gasoline and Renewable Gasoline

Blendstock Pathways Under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS2) Program

This memorandum summarizes the lifecycle GHG results from modeling the renewable gasoline and renewable gasoline blendstock pathway s .Summary of Lifecycle Results

Figure 1 illustrates the lifecycle GHG emissions results from the renewable gasoline and renewable gasolin e blendstock modeling. It shows the percent difference between lifecycle GHG emissions in 2 022 for the pathways as compared to the 2005 petroleum gasoline fuel baseline. Results from the RFS2 final rule for the cellulosic F
- T diesel pathway are also show n for added context.

Figure 1 : Lifecycle GHG Emissions Results from RFS2 Final Rule and Renewable Gasoline and Renewable Gasoline Blendstock Pathways Using Corn Stover (g CO2 - eq./mmBtu)

* Approximated based on biochemical cellulosic ethanol process from RFS2 final rule Table 1 below breaks down by stage the lifecycle GHG emissions for the cellulosic pathways and th e 2005 petroleum baseline. The table demonstrates the contribution of each stage in the fuel pathway and its relative significance in ter ms of GHG emissions. - 60000 - 40000 - 20000 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 1200002005 Gasoline BaselineDirect Fermentation to RenewableGasoline/Gasoline BlendstockRFS2 Final Rule F-T Diesel (includesnaphtha, a gasoline blendstock)Catalytic Pyrolysis to RenewableGasoline BlendstockBiochemical Fermentation toRenewable Gasoline via CarboxylicAcid Fuel Combustion (Tailpipe) Fuel & Feedstock Transport Fuel Production International Land Use Change International Farm Inputs and Fert N2O International Livestock International Rice Methane Domestic Soil Carbon Domestic Rice Methane - 67% - 65%

- 129%* - 91%Table 1 : Lifecycle GHG Emissions for RFS2 Cellulosic Pathways and Cellulosic Gasoline Pathways Using Corn Stover, 2022 (kg CO2 - eq./mmBtu)

Fuel Type 2005 Gasoline

Baseline Direct

Biochemical Fermentation to Renewable Gasoline and Renewable Gasoline Blendstock** RFS2 Final Rule

Cellulosic F
- T Diesel Catalytic

Pyrolysis to Renewable Gasoline Blendstock Biochemical

Fermentation to Renewable Gasoline via Carboxylic Acid Net Domestic Agriculture (w/o land use change) ~11 1 1 9 8 Domestic Land Use Change ~ - 11
- 11
- 9
- 8 Fuel Production 19 < or = - 33 5 2 8 3 0 Fuel and Feedstock Transport * ~2 3 2 2 Tailpipe Emissions 79 ~1 1 2 2 Total Emissions 98 < or = - 29 9 32 34 *Emissions included in fuel production stage.
** Approximated based on biochemical cellulosic ethanol process from RFS2 final rule
.
Continued on next page

Inclusive Competition and 

Market Integrity Under the 

Packers and Stockyards Act

Overview:

On March 5, 2024, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) issued 

the Inclusive Competition and Market Integrity Under the Packers and Stockyards Act final rule. The 

purpose of the rule is to promote inclusive competition and market integrity in the livestock, meat, poultry, 

and live poultry markets. 

USDA’s rule protects livestock producers and poultry growers (covered producers) from unjust 

discrimination, undue prejudices, and deception by packers, swine contractors, and live poultry dealers 

(regulated entities) as follows: 

• Discrimination. Prohibits actions that inhibit market access or actions that are otherwise adverse to 

covered producers on the following basis:

 Race, color, religion, national origin (including ethnicity), sex (including sexual orientation and 

gender identity, as well as pregnancy), disability, marital status, or age.

 The covered producer’s status as a cooperative.

 Exclusions: Religious meats. Tribal governmental functions.

• Retaliation. Prohibits retaliatory and adverse actions that interfere with lawful communications, 

assertion of rights, associational participation, and other protected activities.

Specifically, the following activities by producers are protected from retaliation: 

 Communicating with a government entity or official for redress of grievances with respect to 

livestock or poultry. 

 Refusing a request of the regulated entity to engage in a communication with a government entity 

or official that is not required by law. 

 Asserting the right to form or join, or to refuse to form or join, a producer or grower association or 

organization, or cooperative.

 Communicating with a person for the purposes of improving production or marketing of livestock 

or poultry. 

 Communicating with a regulated entity, another covered producer, or with a commercial entity or 

consultant, for the purpose of exploring or entering into a business relationship.

 Supporting or participating as a witness in any proceeding under the Act or in any proceeding that 

relates to an alleged violation of any law by a regulated entity.

 Asserting any of the rights granted under Act or this part or asserting contract rights. 
Agricultural Marketing Service

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

February 2024 / www.ams.usda.gov

• Deception. Prohibits regulated entities from employing false or misleading statements or omissions 

of material information in contract formation, performance, and termination; and prohibits 

regulated entities from providing false or misleading information regarding refusal to contract.

• Compliance. Requires recordkeeping to support USDA monitoring, evaluation, and enforcement. 

The rule is effective 60 days from publication in the Federal Register.

Learn more on the AMS Inclusive Competition webpage. Questions about the rule may be submitted 

to AMS-AskPSD@usda.gov.
J-A34010-14

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

Appellee

v.

WALTER R. SCHWEIZER

Appellant No. 369 MDA 2014

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence entered December 20, 2013

In the Court of Common Pleas of York County

Criminal Division at No: CP-67-CR-0008282-2012

BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., SHOGAN, and STABILE, JJ.

DISSENTING MEMORANDUM BY STABILE, J.: FILED APRIL 14, 2015

I respectfully dissent and would vacate the sentence and remand for 

resentencing.

I do not disagree with the Majority’s general statement that failure to 

take responsibility and lack of remorse are proper sentencing factors to be 

considered by a trial court. In this case, however, I am unable to separate 

these general considerations from the context in which they were referenced 

by the trial court. The trial court’s reference to lack of remorse and failure 

to take responsibility were stated in response to Appellant’s actions to 

withdraw his guilty plea and exercise his right to go to trial. A defendant 

who chooses to “go to trial and roll the dice” exercises a right guaranteed by 

our federal and state constitutions. I therefore, would find error under 

Commonwealth v. Bethea, 379 A.2d 102 (Pa. 1977).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> UT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      536,325
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      2,547
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         149,739
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        44,708
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  81,247
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 814,566
<COMMON>                                        51,418
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       43,233
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            174,240
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 268,891
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           29,343
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           209,467
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  29,185
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      1,495
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   533
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 275,652
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  814,566
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      374,967
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            17,294
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      73,169
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     129,046
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         36,159
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 276
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  36,435
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         9,088
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,540
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        963
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   34,577
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        12,649
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        8,384
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         114,028
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    67.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    67.25
        


</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

862.3 

KA 12-01876 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

DESTINY BELLAUS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

WAGNER & HART, LLP, OLEAN (JANINE C. FODOR OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LORI PETTIT RIEMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LITTLE VALLEY, FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Cattaraugus County Court (Larry M.

Himelein, J.), rendered July 9, 2012. The appeal was held by this

Court by order entered January 3, 2014, the decision was reserved and

the matter was remitted to Cattaraugus County Court for further

proceedings (113 AD3d 1113). 

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance

signed by defendant on March 17, 2014, and the attorneys for the

parties on March 25 and April 2, 2014,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed 

upon stipulation.

Entered: September 26, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.3.8    
  


 
 

Supplemental Compensation Agreement    
  


        This supplemental compensation agreement is made and entered into this 1 day of April, 2001, by and between The Wet Seal, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("Wet Seal"), Kathy Bronstein ("Bronstein"), and specifies compensation that will be paid to Employee in addition to the compensation specified in the Service Agreement dated
December 30, 1998, as amended, between Wet Seal and Bronstein. 



        In
consideration of Bronstein's continued employment with the Wet Seal, the Wet Seal agrees to pay all interest relating to outstanding loan balances on a $2,000,000 line of credit, to
be arranged by Bronstein at her convenience and liability, relating to the construction of Bronstein's personal residence beginning March 1, 2001, and ending when the line of credit is
converted by Bronstein into a mortgage on her personal residence. Thereafter, the Wet Seal agrees to pay interest on $2,000,000 of the mortgage loan balance on Bronstein's personal residence through
the month of March, 2006, or the end of Bronstein's employment, whichever is sooner. 



        The
Wet Seal will make the payments specified in this agreement on a monthly basis based upon documents produced by the lending institutions issuing the line of credit and mortgage loan
discussed in the preceding paragraph. 


        Executed
by the Wet Seal and Bronstein on the dates set forth as written above. 



	"Wet Seal"	 	"Bronstein"
	

THE WET SEAL, INC.,

A Delaware Corporation	
 	

 
	

/s/ Irving Teitelbaum
 Irving Teitelbaum

Chairman of the Board	
 	

/s/ Kathy Bronstein
 Kathy Bronstein











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.3.8


Supplemental Compensation Agreement
June 24, 2015 

Mr. Tom Seiler 

Seiler Instrument Inc. 

3433 Tree Court Industrial Blvd. 

St. Louis, MO 63122 

Dear Mr.Seiler: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your June 5, exemption request on behalf of Seiler Instrument Inc. into the public 

docket (No. FAA-2015-2130), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Month # of exceedances

Jan 21

Feb 6

Mar 0

Apr 0

May 0

Jun 2

Jul 0

Aug 1

Sep 0

Oct 0

Nov 8

Dec 28

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul

Exceedances of the 24-hour NAAQ

Number of days with a 24-hour PM2.5 measurement exce

Bay Area site, 2006-2012, by mont
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

hour NAAQS for PM2.5

2.5 measurement exceeding 35 ug/m3 at some 

2012, by month
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 24713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9987]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Revocation

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the 
following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been revoked 
pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 
409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing 
of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515, effective on 
the corresponding date shown below:

    License Number: 003129F.
    Name: Traffic Care International Corp.
    Address: 9550 Flair Drive, Suite 509, El Monte, CA 91731.
    Date Revoked: March 21, 2012.
    Reason: Voluntarily surrendered license.

    License Number: 019289N.
    Name: Aramex International Courier, Ltd., dba Aramex.
    Address: 182-25 150th Avenue, Springfield Gardens, NY 11413.
    Date Revoked: April 13, 2012.
    Reason: Voluntarily surrendered license.

    License Number: 020597N.
    Name: Ferrara International Worldwide Inc.
    Address: 1319 North Broad Street, Hillside, NJ 07205.
    Date Revoked: February 16, 2012.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 021797N.
    Name: Four Points Ocean Inc.
    Address: 1460 Route 9, Suite 303, Woodridge, NJ 07095.
    Date Revoked: March 1, 2012.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 022539F.
    Name: Preferred Movers International, LLC.
    Address: 3201 Ambrose Avenue, Nashville, TN 37207.
    Date Revoked: April 5, 2012.
    Reason: Voluntarily surrendered license.

Vern W. Hill,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 2012-9987 Filed 4-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Harpreet Singh Sangha, the Chief Executive Officer, and Herminder Rai, the Chief Financial Officer, of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Harpreet S. SanghaHarpreet S. SanghaPresident,Chief Executive Officer and a director 
Date:  January 19, 2011
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Herminder RaiHerminder RaiSecretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer 
Date:  January 19, 2011          

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

__________
Exhibit 31.2


                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Beth M. Halberstadt, as Chief Financial Officer of the American Bar
Association Members/ State Street Collective Trust, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the American Bar
Association Members/ State Street Collective Trust;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2003
                                                /s/ Beth M. Halberstadt
                                               ------------------------
                                               Beth M. Halberstadt
                                               Chief Financial Officer
FORMAL RECOMMENDATION BY THE

NATIONAL ORGANIC STANDARDS BOARD (NOSB) 

TO THE NATIONAL ORGANIC PROGRAM (NOP) 

Date: _11/20/2007____

Subject: __Sunset Recommendation- Peracetic Acid___ 

Chair: __Andrea Caroe______________ 

 

Recommendation

The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: 

Rulemaking Action: ___X__ 

Guidance Statement: ________ 

Other: ________ 

Statement of the Recommendation (including Recount of Vote):

To retain Peracetic Acid - on the National List in §205.601(a)(6) As algaecide, disinfectants, and 

sanitizers, including irrigation system cleaning: 

- for use in disinfecting equipment,seed, and asexually propogated planting material 

 And in §205.601(i)(7) As plant disease control: 

- for use to control fireblight bacteria 

NOSB Vote: Motion: Gerald Davis Second: Kevin Engelbert 

Board vote: Yes - 15 No- 0 Abstain- 0 Absent - 0 

Rationale Supporting Recommendation (including consistency with OFPA and NOP):

Material is still used in organic production. No new information brought forward to warrant 

removal from the list. 

Sunset Material Vote 

Response by the NOP:
Crops Committee Recommendation for §205.601 August 22, 2007 

I. List: 205.601 Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic crop production 

II. Category Use(s) 

(a) As algicide, disinfectants, and sanitizers, including irrigation system cleaners. 

(i) As plant disease control. 

III. Committee Summary: 

Peracetic Acid (peroxyacetic acid- PAA) was added to the National List (Federal Register 

Vol.68, No.211 10/31/2003) under categories listed above with these annotations: 

“for use in disinfecting equipment, seed, and asexually propagated planting material”, 

“for use to control fireblight bacteria”. 

PAA is the combined result of mixtures of hydrogen peroxide and acetic acid (vinegar), 

and retains the disinfectant qualities of hydrogen peroxide in a form considered safe to 

use. As a surface disinfectant PAA, though synthetic, is considered to be a viable and 

desirable replacement for the chlorine materials. As control for fireblight bacteria in 

apples and pears, PAA and new biological controls are potential replacements for 

materials such as streptomycin. 

IV. Committee Recommendation: 

Recommendations based upon comments received- 205.601(a) and (i) 

The Crops Committee recommends renewal of the following material in the use 

categories: 

(a) As algicide, disinfectants, and sanitizers, including irrigation system cleaning 

systems. 

(6) Peracetic acid- for use in disinfecting equipment, seed, and asexually propagated 

 planting material. 

(i) As plant disease control. 

(7) Peracetic acid- for use to control fireblight bacteria. 

Moved: Jeff Moyer Second: Tina Ellor 

Committee vote: Yes: 6 No: 0 Absent: 1 Abstain: 0