alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 2, 2020

No. 04-20-00405-CR

Barry William UHR,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR7090

Honorable Stephanie R. Boyd, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The trial court imposed sentence in the underlying cause on May 4, 2020. Because 

appellant timely filed a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed August 3, 

2020. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was 

due on August 18, 2020. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on August 12, 

2011, but appellant did not file a motion for extension of time. 

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. See 

Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). A late notice of appeal may be 

considered timely so as to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction if (1) it is filed within fifteen 

days of the last day allowed for filing, (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of 

appeals within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, and (3) the 

court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time. See id. Having reviewed the record, 

it appears that the notice of appeal was untimely filed, and no motion for extension of time was 

filed. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing no later than September 17, 

2020 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See id.; see also Ater v. 

Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (out-of-time appeal from final 

felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the 

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure). If appellant does not timely respond, this appeal will be 

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of September, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1117 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1117

      To clarify that individuals excepted from furlough and paid 
 unemployment compensation on the basis of Federal service during any 
   lapse in appropriations occurring in fiscal year 2019 are deemed 
                    eligible for such compensation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2019

    Ms. Hill of California introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To clarify that individuals excepted from furlough and paid 
 unemployment compensation on the basis of Federal service during any 
   lapse in appropriations occurring in fiscal year 2019 are deemed 
                    eligible for such compensation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Shutdown Fairness Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION RELATED TO ELIGIBILITY FOR UNEMPLOYMENT 
              COMPENSATION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, 
beginning on December 22, 2018, any individual who is paid unemployment 
compensation by a State, on the basis of the individual's Federal 
service (as defined in section 8501 or 8521 of title 5, United States 
Code), for a week during fiscal year 2019 during any part of which a 
lapse in appropriations is in effect with respect to which the 
individual is excepted from furlough shall be deemed to be totally 
separated from Federal service and eligible for unemployment 
compensation benefits under subchapter I of chapter 85 of title 5 of 
the United States Code for such week.
    (b) Effective Date.--This section shall apply with respect to weeks 
beginning on or after December 22, 2018.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10(a)  


[Sutherland /*/ Asbill & /*/ Brennan LLP Letterhead]  


April 19, 2002 


Board
of Directors

Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company

2801 Highway 201 South

Birmingham, Alabama 35223 



Directors: 


        We
hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal Matters" in the statement of additional information filed as part of pre-effective amendment number 1 to
the registration statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-76952) filed by Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company and Variable Annuity Account A of Protective Life with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933. 



	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 
	



 	

 	



Sincerely,
	

 	
 	

SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/ David S. Goldstein
 David S. Goldstein
<PAGE>

                                                                       EX-10.8.4

                     DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONAL BONUS PLANS

The Operational Bonus Plans provide bonus compensation that is based upon
operational performance to the Company's officers, including the Chief Executive
Officer and the Company's other executive officers and certain other employees
who have operational or sales-related responsibilities. Under these plans, a
target bonus is established annually for each participant, and the participant
receives a percentage of the target bonus based upon the achievement of either
targeted revenues, sales or bookings (on either a divisional or company-wide
basis, depending upon the particular plan), subject to adjustment for
operational factors such as on time delivery and manufacturing yield percentage.
The targets are set annually by the Board.

Payments under these bonus plans, if any, are made quarterly according to a
formula established by the Board for the first three quarters in the year in
which the bonus is earned, with a final bonus payment being made in the fiscal
year subsequent to the fiscal year in which the bonus was earned.

Each bonus plan is administered by the Board of Directors and is subject to
change or termination by the Board at any time.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

RPOST INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,

Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,

Cross-Appellant

______________________ 

2014-1497, 2014-1501

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 

91158431, 91158514, 92043665, and 92044260.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

HENRY BEN-ZVI, Ben-Zvi & Associates, Santa Monica, 

CA, argued for appellant. 

KIMBERLY ANNE DEMARCHI, Lewis Roca Rothgerber 

LLP, Phoenix, AZ, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by SHANE E. OLAFSON. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (CHEN, BRYSON, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 April 10, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In   connection   with  the  Annual  Report  of  Boston  Gas  Company  (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Joseph F. Bodanza,  Senior Vice President and Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer of the  Corporation,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Corporation.

                                                 /s/ Joseph F. Bodanza
                                                 ---------------------
                                          Name:  Joseph F. Bodanza
                                          Title: Senior Vice President and
                                                 Principal Financial and
                                                 Accounting Officer
                                          Date:  March 28, 2003


Note: A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to Boston Gas Company and will be retained by Boston Gas Company
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
Order filed, April 09, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00221-CR

____________

JOSHUA FESELIER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1390943

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due March 30, 2015. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Arlene Webb, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
Court of Appeals

First District of Texas

301 Fannin Street

Houston, Texas 77002-2066

SHERRY RADACK

 CHIEF JUSTICE

TERRY JENNINGS

EVELYN KEYES

LAURA CARTER HIGLEY

JANE BLAND

MICHAEL MASSENGALE

HARVEY BROWN

REBECA HUDDLE

RUSSELL LLOYD

 JUSTICES

CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT

JANET WILLIAMS

 CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

PHONE: 713-274-2700

FAX: 713-755-8131

 www.txcourts.gov/1stcoa.aspx

April 8, 2015

Nelda T. Garcia

Administrative Assistant IV

Office of the Attorney General

Criminal Appeals Division 

William P. Clements Bldg. 8th Floor

300w. 15th Street

Austin, Texas 78701

Nelda.garcia@texasattorneygeneral.gov

(512) 475-3321

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 01-11-00213-CR Trial Court Case Number: 1204054

Style: Daniel Harris. v. The State of Texas

We are forwarding the records for the above referenced cause via the FTP site.

Sincerely,

Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court

By Jesse Rodriguez, Deputy Clerk IV
**Exhibit
      32.2**









**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of MSGI Security Solutions, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
      Jeremy Barbera, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Interim
      Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







Dated:  December
        26, 2006
 By:
              /s/ Richard
                J. Mitchell IIIRichard
                  J. Mitchell III
                Chief
                  Accounting Officer
                (Principal
                    Financial Officer)







This
      certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
      by
      such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required
      by
      Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 941 05 

April 16,2008 

James Goldstene, Executive Officer 

California Air Resources Board 

100 1 I Street 

Sacramento, CA 958 12 

RE: Adequacy Status of Imperial 8-hour Ozone Early Progress Plan Motor Vehicle 

Emissions Budgets 

Dear Mr. Goldstene: 

We have found adequate for transpol-tation conformity purposes the motor vehicle 

emissions budgets (MVEBs) in the Imperial County 8-hour Ozone Early Progress Plan 

(February 2008). As a result of our adequacy findings, the Southern California 

Association of Governments and the U.S. Department of Transportation must use these 

budgets in future conformity analyses once the finding becomes effective. 

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) submitted the draft Imperial County 

8-hour Ozone Early Progress Plan to EPA for parallel processing on February 6,2008 as 

a revision to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The plan identifies regional 

MVEBs for the nonattinment area for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen 

oxides (NOx) for the year 2009. We announced receipt of the plan on EPA's website on 

February 14,2008, and requested public comment by March 17,2008. We did not 

receive any comments on the budgets and plan during that comment period. CARB 

formally adopted the plan without amendment on February 28,2008, and submitted the 

final version to EPA on March 24, 2008. 

This letter transmits our decision that the motor vehicle emissions budgets 

contained in the Imperial County 8-hour Ozone Early Progress Plan are adequate for 

transportation conformity decisions. The plan identifies regional motor vehicle emission 

budgets in the table below: 

Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets 

We have detailed our adequacy findings in the enclosure. A copy of this letter and 

its enclosures will soon be posted on the Internet at 

Budget Year 

I I 

2009 

VOC1 (tons per day) NOx (tons per day) 

The plan uses a comparable State term, reactive organic gases (ROG). 

7 17 
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm. We will also announce 

the adequacy findings in the Federal Register. The findings will become effective 15 days 

after the Federal Register announcement. 

If you have any questions regarding these adequacy findings, please contact Amy 

Zimpfer at (4 15) 947-4 146 or Adrienne Priselac at (4 15) 972-3285. 

Sincerely, 

Deborah ~or&n 

Director. Air Division 

Enclosure 

cc: Hasan Ikhrata. SCAG 

Jonathan Nadler. SCAG 

Jean Mazur, FHWA
##### 



Exhibit 24
  POWER OF
    ATTORNEY
  Bowne & Co., Inc. and each person whose signature
    appears below hereby authorize both David J. Shea and Scott L.
    Spitzer, each with full power to act alone, to file in either
    paper or electronic form an annual report on
    Form 10-K
    and any and all amendments thereto, under the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, for the fiscal year ended
    December 31, 2007, which report and amendments shall
    contain such information and exhibits as the said David J. Shea
    or Scott L. Spitzer deems appropriate. Bowne & Co.,
    Inc. and each such person signing below hereby further appoint
    both David J. Shea and Scott L. Spitzer as attorneys-in-fact,
    each with full power to act alone, to execute such report and
    any and all amendments thereto in the name and on behalf of
    Bowne & Co., Inc. as well as in the name and on behalf
    of each such person, individually and in each capacity stated
    below, thereby granting to said attorneys-in-fact and each of
    them full power and authority to do and perform each and every
    act and thing whatsoever that any of them may deem necessary or
    advisable in order to carry out fully the intent of the
    foregoing as the undersigned might or could do personally or in
    their capacities aforesaid.
  Bowne & Co.,
    Inc.
  By:
    /s/  David
    J. Shea   Chairman of the Board and
 Chief Executive Officer
  Dated:
    March 12, 2008
  Signature

Title

Date/s/  David
    J. Shea(David
    J. Shea)

Chairman of the Board and
    Chief Executive Officer

March 12, 2008/s/  John
    J. Walker(John
    J. Walker)

Senior Vice President and
    Chief Financial Officer
    (Principal Financial Officer)

March 12, 2008/s/  Richard
    Bambach, Jr.(Richard
    Bambach, Jr.)

Vice President and 
    Corporate Controller
    (Principal Accounting Officer)

March 12, 2008/s/  Carl
    J. Crosetto(Carl
    J. Crosetto)

Director

March 12, 2008/s/  Douglas
    B. Fox(Douglas
    B. Fox)

Director

March 12, 2008/s/  Marcia
    J. Hooper(Marcia
    J. Hooper)

Director

March 12, 2008/s/  Philip
    E. Kucera(Philip
    E. Kucera)

Director

March 12, 2008




---



##### 



Signature

Title

Date/s/  Stephen
    V. Murphy(Stephen
    V. Murphy)

Director

March 12, 2008/s/  Gloria
    M. Portela(Gloria
    M. Portela)

Director

March 12, 2008/s/  H.
    Marshall Schwarz(H.
    Marshall Schwarz)

Director

March 12, 2008/s/  Lisa
    A. Stanley(Lisa
    A. Stanley)

Director

March 12, 2008/s/  Vincent
    Tese(Vincent
    Tese)

Director

March 12, 2008/s/  Richard
    R. West(Richard
    R. West)

Director

March 12, 2008/s/  David
    J. Shea(David
    J. Shea)

ATTORNEY IN FACT

March 12, 2008
Agricultural G-66 Specification

Marketing July 08, 2020

Service

Quality Assessment Division 

1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 

Washington, DC 20250 Page 1 of 2 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Elkhorn Valley Packing

Valley Pride Black Angus Beef Program

G-66 Specification

1 REQUIREMENTS

Beef carcasses certified under this specification shall meet the following requirements: 

a. Phenotypic requirements of the American Angus Association’s (AAA) Live Animal

Specification;

b. Classed as Steer, Heifer, or Cow carcasses only1;

c. U.S. Standard, Commercial, or Utility and have a minimum marbling score of Slight 01;

d. Moderately thick or thicker muscling and tend to be at least moderately wide and thick in

relation to their length2

3

;

e. No hump exceeding 2 inches in height ;

f. Practically free (not detracting from visual quality) of capillary rupture in the ribeye muscle;

and

g. Free of “dark cutting” characteristics.

2 CERTIFICATION

Carcasses to be examined for compliance with this specification shall be clearly identified and 

presented to an AMS grader for certification. Certification procedures for identification, the removal 

of preliminary identification marks (or other methods of control) from non-qualifying carcasses, and 

control of certified carcasses shall be in accordance with established Quality Assessment Division 

(QAD) procedures.

3 LABELING

Labeling of products derived from certified carcasses must follow Food Safety and Inspection Service 

regulations and policy guidelines and QAD procedures. 

4 FEES

1 Determined in accordance with the “Official United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef.” 2 Muscle thickness is evaluated by averaging the thickness of the various parts, considering not only the proportion of each part of the 

carcass but also the general value of each part. Superior muscle thickness implies a high proportion of meat to bone and a high 

proportion of the weight of the carcass in the more valuable parts.

3 Measured from a line formed by the extension of the top line (including the fat) and measuring the lean muscle (excluding the fat) 

perpendicular to that line in the center of the hump.
Agricultural G-66 Specification

Marketing July 08, 2020

Service

Quality Assessment Division 

1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 

Washington, DC 20250 Page 2 of 2 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

The costs of all grading and certification services performed by an AMS grader involving 

examinations, supervision, official documentation, and related services shall be borne by the person, 

group, or plant requesting the service. 

___________________________________

Chad Nelson, National Meat Supervisor 

Standards and Specifications Division

Livestock & Poultry Program
Exhibit 10.8



Exhibit 10.8 Promissory Note to Mr. Smitten - $3,000



                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

Principal amount:  $ 3,000.00

Date:   July 16, 2001

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby jointly and severally promise to pay
to the order of Richard Smitten the sum of Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000), with
no interest thereon. Said sum shall be paid in the following manner: Upon
demand.

The undersigned and all other parties to this note, whether as endorsers,
guarantors or sureties, agree to remain fully bound until this note shall be
fully paid and waive demand, presentment and protest and all notices hereto and
further agree to remain bound notwithstanding any extension, modification,
waiver, or other indulgence or discharge or release of any obligor hereunder or
exchange, substitution, or release of any collateral granted as security for
this note. No modification or indulgence by any holder hereof shall be binding
unless in writing; and any indulgence on any one occasion shall not be an
indulgence for any other or future occasion. Any modification or change in
terms, hereunder granted by any holder hereof, shall be valid and binding upon
each of the undersigned, notwithstanding the acknowledgement of any of the
undersigned, and each of the undersigned does hereby irrevocably grant to each
of the others a power of attorney to enter into any such modification on their
behalf. This note shall take effect as a sealed instrument and shall be
construed, governed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of
Florida.


By:  /s/Richard Smitten
      Richard Smitten, Pres.
  Stock Market Solutions, Inc Borrower