alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Troy
      A. Lyndon, Chief Executive Officer of Left Behind Games Inc. (the “Company”),
      have reviewed the Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the period ending
      March 31, 2007 (the “Report”). For purposes of Section 1350 of Title
      18, United States Code, I certify that to the best of my knowledge:
      .





a.
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





b.
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.






/s/
      Troy A. Lyndon


Troy
      A.
      Lyndon, President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)





Dated
      July 16, 2007
National Grain Center

Tour – Day 1

Grain Inspection Advisory Committee Meeting

September 5, 2018
Board of Appeals and Review

Primary Functions

• Board appeals

• Supervision of FGIS/agency QASs

• Licenses FGIS inspectors

• Serves as reference method for 

visual inspections

• Conducts grain grading seminars

• Industry

• International trade groups

• QASs

• Inspectors
Inspection Instrumentation

DICKEY-john GAC2500-UGMA

Primary Functions

• Quality Control and Standardization

• NIRT, NMR, Moisture Meter 

• Official Calibrations

• NIRT and NMR

• Official and Commercial Calibrations

• Moisture

Foss Infratec 1241

Bruker Minispec MQ-One
Inspection Instrumentation

Primary Functions

• Evaluate Instruments and Equipment

• Official Inspection

• Commercial Inspection

• Research and Development

• Evaluate and Approve D/T samplers
Wheat Functionality

Primary Functions

• Evaluate methods for characterizing 

end-use quality factors

• Administer national falling number 

quality assurance program

• Provide varietal identification of wheat 

by chemical analysis

• Provide rice iron enrichment test kits 

to official service providers

• Provide reference materials for wheat 

hardness test
Digital Media

Primary Functions

• Visual References for 

Inspection Standardization

• eLearning Content

• Inspector Training

• Industry Education

• Marketing Materials for 

Outreach
Digital Media

Support Functions

• NGC A/V equipment

• NGC Digital Signage

• Graphic Illustration

• Image Editing

• Video/Photography

• 508 Compliance

• Page Layout

Harvest to Harbor
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 29 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit 

the number of terms an individual may serve as a Member of Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2019 

Mr. HOLDING submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to limit the number of terms an individual may 

serve as a Member of Congress. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 29 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. No person shall serve as a Representa3 tive for more than six two-year terms. Service as a Rep4 resentative for more than one year of any two-year term 

5 shall be treated as a complete term for purposes of this 

6 section, without regard to whether the service was com7 pleted by the individual originally elected to the term. 

8 ‘‘SECTION 2. No person shall serve as a Senator for 

9 more than two six-year terms. Service as a Senator for 

10 more than three years of any six-year term shall be treated 

11 as a complete term for purposes of this section, without 

12 regard to whether the service was completed by the indi13 vidual originally elected to the term. 

14 ‘‘SECTION 3. No term beginning before the date of 

15 the ratification of this article shall be taken into account 

16 in determining eligibility for election or appointment under 

17 this article.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
FORMAL RECOMMENDATION BY THE

NATIONAL ORGANIC STANDARDS BOARD (NOSB) 

TO THE NATIONAL ORGANIC PROGRAM (NOP) 

Date: ____6-06-06____________________

Subject: Sunset Renewal Vote for Lecithin – unbleached, under 205.606 

Chair: Kevin O’Rell 

 

Recommendation

The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: 

Rulemaking Action: _XXXXX_ 

Guidance Statement: ________ 

Other: ________ 

Statement of the Recommendation (including Recount of Vote):

Recommendation to Renew Lecithin – unbleached under 205.606. 

Moved: Julie Weisman Second: Nancy Ostiguy 

Yes – 12 

No – 0 

Abstain – 0 

Absent – 2 

Rationale Supporting Recommendation (including consistency with OFPA and NOP):

Sunset Material Vote 

Response by the NOP:
National Organic Standards Board 

Handling Committee 

Final Recommendation for 205.606 – Lecithin, unbleached 

April 20, 2006

I. List: 205.606 Non-organically produced agricultural products allowed as ingredients in or 

on processed products labeled as “organic” or “made with organic (specified ingredients or 

food group(s)).” 

II. Committee Summary: Many comments were received supporting the retention of materials, 

including lecithin – unbleached, currently listed in section 205.606. One commenter, who 

generally appeared to object to the entire National List, opposed the re-listing of this material. 

However detailed information as to why lecithin-unbleached was not compatible with organic 

practices, as specified in the Federal Register, was not provided in this comment. 

Another commenter noted that organic forms of lecithin are available, and had concerns that there 

will be no market for the organically produced material if the non-organically produced material 

remains on the list. However, some commenters also noted that the organic form is either 

insufficient in quantity or inadequate in functionality. Comments were received from a 

manufacturer of organic lecithin – unbleached who indicated that organic lecithin, unbleached 

can be manufactured in sufficient quantity to meet demand. However, this manufacturer also 

clearly stated that organic forms of every formulation of lecithin – unbleached that are currently 

being used do not exist. 

The handling committee agrees, based on compelling evidence given by a manufacturer of 

organic lecithin – unbleached, that every use of lecithin – unbleached cannot be adequately filled 

by the organic forms that are currently available. 

III. NOSB Recommendation(s): The handling committee recommends the renewal of the 

following substances in this use category: 

Lecithin-unbleached 

The handling committee recommends deferring the vote on the following materials until further 

technical information is obtained. The materials to be deferred are: 

None in this category 

The handling committee recommends not renewing the following substances in this use category 

based on the submitted evaluation forms: 

None in this category 
NOSB Vote: 

Moved: Julie Weisman Second: Nancy Ostiguy 

 Board vote: Yes – 12 No – 0 Abstain – 0 Absent - 2
CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT
  W I T N E S S E T H
     SEVERANCE BENEFITS




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



PAYMENT LIMITATION
  RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
  4




---



##### 



MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT
  SEVERABILITY
  5




---



##### 



STRICT ADHERENCE
  ASSIGNMENT
  OTHER RIGHTS
  NOTICES
  6




---



##### 



ERISA; NON-PROPERTY INTEREST
  GOVERNING LAW
  7




---



##### 



COUNTERPARTS; FACSIMILE SIGNATURES, EXECUTION AND DELIVERY
  TAXES
   8




---



##### 



SPECIALTY UNDERWRITERS ALLIANCE, INC.By:
    /s/ Courtney C. SmithCourtney C. SmithPresident & Chief Executive OfficerHOLDERBy:
    /s/ Scott K. CharbonneauScott K. Charbonneau 9
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Identification 29.0 $2,465.0

0

$0 $2,465.00 24 $59,160.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $59,160

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

Replacement 1.0 $ 85.00 0 $ 85.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.1

Summary of the Company's Bonus Plans under which some of the executive
officers of the Company and certain other personnel of the subsidiaries are
eligible to receive a bonus each year.
     101

<PAGE>

1997 BRENTON BANKS, INC. BONUS PLANS

For 1997, the Company (Brenton Banks, Inc. and Subsidiaries) has bonus plans
that cover executive officers, line of business managers, subsidiary
presidents, senior managers, market managers, and other key personnel.  The
following chart summarizes the main features of these bonus plans:

Bonus potential (as percent of base pay):
     Executive officers                        37.50%
     Line of business managers and
       subsidiary presidents                   30.00%
     Market managers                           30.00%
     Senior managers and other key personnel   10.00% to 30.00%

Bonus threshold for executive officers:
     Bonus achievement is tied to a consolidated earnings threshold of
$17,000,000 whereby no bonus will be paid if this earnings threshold is not
achieved.  For executive officers 50% to 100% of bonus is tied to consolidated
net income.  The same tiered earnings bonus matrix applies to all employees
who have a portion of their bonus tied to consolidated net income.  The tiered
earnings bonus matrix provides for no bonus unless net income exceeds
$17,000,000 and provides for 100% of bonus to be earned when net income
exceeds $18,000,000.

Bonus criteria:
     Bonus amounts are paid for achievement of certain pre-established
financial and personal goals, the most significant of which are as follows:
     Consolidated net income
     Subsidiary or line of business net income
     Sales goals
     Growth in loans
     Growth in core deposits
     Fee income generation
     Non-interest income
     Non-interest expense
     Key personal objectives

Bonus achievements:
     Bonus amounts are earned ratably based on actual results compared to a
tiered bonus achievement matrix.
     102
Exhibit 31.1


FORM 10-K CERTIFICATION


I, Tracy J. Myrick, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of DTE Electric Securitization Funding II LLC (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");


2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing, and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by DTE Electric Company, as servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Securitization Property Servicing Agreement, dated November 1, 2023, by and between DTE Electric Securitization Funding II LLC and DTE Electric Company, in all material respects; and


5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10‐K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Indenture Trustee.





/S/ TRACY J. MYRICKDate:March 20, 2024Tracy J. MyrickChief Accounting Officer andsenior officer in charge of the servicing function ofDTE Electric Company
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SHCEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
     QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998,
     AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           221,788
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,138,880
<ALLOWANCES>                                     139,000
<INVENTORY>                                    1,177,030
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,505,648
<PP&E>                                           379,022
<DEPRECIATION>                                   197,871
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,756,599
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,608,022
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         506,391
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,500,178
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,756,599
<SALES>                                        3,683,647
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,764,954
<CGS>                                          2,564,387
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,564,387
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 832,936
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                33,982
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  333,649
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              333,649
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     333,649
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0.119
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.113
        


</TABLE>
CL.€d. 

LOull-7 oF (ftpiZd:';). 

SP"vAA,~?J.t J/57~c7 o/""h-x:-4-&. 

5o ( ~ . r; ( VYto ~ • Su ct.-£ 2~A 

4 VM.I.i..Q..d G , (ax; AS?:. t'1to( ~ ~44 . 

..:Kc'. o·/-IS-ooo"'io-c::.\1. 

4 -(-IS .. 

~ ~PR ~1 7n~ ~ SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS 

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK 

t:"'iA--.tl:\fL£..;1S ~A.~on..Lt.S " CA-rt\i=i:<Lit-4f[ !Woi'\1\/l& . 

--r .Ai"'A ~<..n2J.v~ (o /~ 1 t- !1-Hz CoviZT ~~ ~iLC.~Ni=i.C.. 

~o ~-rfi:..~ ---rt.ht: k0VV'-i:;;..)""TS {~\ w!-kt::~z."C.. -hlrr~, ""'I h.L£:.o 

~t:Quii'S.\ tf' Po::tSt~t.~ lo ~Lc~l~fi:-6 ap'l, ~ oi= -n-+e c.l~'~ ~'Leu~ .. 

"'I J.\VY\ ~u~'-'.-.l'S /.L&:>Vl" -n-l..t:: 64~t~M... kk:.i:, ~~.:~ .. , ~~ w.~ Supptt~ ;LJ ....... t.o ~--"L<JI2;...(ff"~ w~ \\ Co~C1L.'-( 4-dl~'D 

l~-..l. ·-r M.k.. ~12':>-J~t...n """L:l .'rJ.t: )pp . .P. ~4 .SCI-4) .. 

34 .C(k). cl~~ ~ G-"(:)~ .. d\ (....riH ..PAI2-'lln:;;. ltJ£ diU2LL-

~'1 ~IT wnl4 1~1:.. ~.Aftlll'l::.S C:.-..t~~~~ -nJ.~ Cb ... (-rr?":ii-S oi=-

--rtJ.n:... cl~.s ~~s . 

St....cc;cvt...n:(1 ' 

CvA....l~;..:Cl.:::>S> iftSuN-t ~ 

~ 
-~· -· -· 

-· -.--· ~ -· 

--=-~ -

~ 

~ 

~ 

~~ ' 

~ 

·'-.J 

...... \ 

\3 

"' I 

~ ~ 

"-.\) 

U\ 

a 

....... 

lf) 

; 

l' 

... \ 

~ ~ I'<} 

~ 

~ 

~ f"l 

t\1 

~ 

V" ~ . l 

~ 

~ ~ ~ 

\'-~ '{ 

~ 

~ ~ ~ " 

~ VI ~ 

~ ~ 

1\ 

-..J ~ <:) 0 ~ 

~ ~
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-44 Specification

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 July 8, 2019

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 1 of 2

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Creekstone Farms

Premium Black Angus Beef Program

G-44 Specification

1 REQUIREMENTS

Beef carcasses certified under this specification shall meet the following requirements:

a. Phenotypic or genotypic requirements of the American Angus Association’s (AAA) Live 

Animal Specification;

b. Classed as Steer or Heifer carcasses only1;

c. U.S. Prime or Choice and have a minimum marbling score of Modest 01;

d. Less than 30 months of age with lean color, texture, and firmness, meeting the requirements for 

A maturity in the U.S. grade it qualifies for1;

e. Medium or fine marbling texture1,2;

f. Moderately thick or thicker muscling and tend to be at least moderately wide and thick in 

relation to their length3;

g. No hump exceeding 2 inches in height4;

and

h. Practically free (not detracting from visual quality) of capillary rupture in the ribeye muscle.

2 CERTIFICATION

Carcasses to be examined for compliance with this specification shall be clearly identified and 

presented to an AMS grader for certification. Certification procedures for identification, the removal 

of preliminary identification marks (or other methods of control) from non-qualifying carcasses, and 

control of certified carcasses shall be in accordance with established Quality Assessment Division 

(QAD) procedures.

3 LABELING

Labeling of products derived from certified carcasses must follow Food Safety and Inspection Service 

regulations and policy guidelines and QAD procedures.

 1 Determined in accordance with the “Official United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef.” 2 Evaluated using the USDA-AMS-LS-SB-02 Marbling Texture card (included in the Official USDA Marbling Photographs.) 3 Muscle thickness is evaluated by averaging the thickness of the various parts, considering not only the proportion of each part of the 

carcass but also the general value of each part. Superior muscle thickness implies a high proportion of meat to bone and a high 

proportion of the weight of the carcass in the more valuable parts.

4 Measured from a line formed by the extension of the top line (including the fat) and measuring the lean muscle (excluding the fat) 

perpendicular to that line in the center of the hump.
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-44 Specification

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 July 8, 2019

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 2 of 2

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

4 FEES

The costs of all grading and certification services performed by an AMS grader involving 

examinations, supervision, official documentation, and related services shall be borne by the person, 

group, or plant requesting the service.

___________________________________

Chad Nelson, National Meat Supervisor

Quality Assessment Division

Livestock & Poultry Program
AMS Animal Handling and Welfare Performance – Fiscal Year: 20211/,2/,3/6

Species / Total # Animals Observed Missed Stuns4/,5/ Sensible Animals on Rail

Supplier (% of Grand Total) # % # %

Beef Total 3,401 (43.4) 0 0 0 0

S1 100 (1.2) 0 0 0 0

S2 200 (2.3) 0 0 0 0

S4 200(2.3) 0 0 0 0

S5 200 (2.3) 0 0 0 0

S6 100 (1.2) 0 0 0 0

S10 300 (3.5) 0 0 0 0

S11 200 (2.3) ■ ■ 0 0

S12 200 (2.3) 0 0 0 0

S21 50 (0.5) 0 0 0 0

S25 200 (2.3) 0 0 0 0

S28 200 (2.3) 0 0 0 0

S296/ 43 (0.5) 0 0 0 0

S31 200 (2.3) 0 0 0 0

S32 200 (2.3) 0 0 0 0

S41 200 (2.3) 0 0 0 0

S42 200 (2.3) 0 0 0 0

S43 200 (2.3) 0 0 0 0

S446/ 42 (0.5) 0 0 0 0

S45 300 (3.5) 0 0 0 0

V50 200 (2.3) 0 0 0 0

S476/ 40(0.5) 0 0 0 0

S486/ 26 (0.3) 0 0 0 0

Pork Total 4,000 (46.9) 0 0 0 0

S1 200 (2.3) --- --- 0 0

S2 100 (1.2) --- --- 0 0

S3 200 (2.3) --- --- 0 0

S4 200 (2.3) --- --- 0 0

S5 100 (1.2) --- --- 0 0

S6 200 (2.3) --- --- 0 0

S7 200 (2.3) --- --- 0 0

S8 200 (2.3) --- --- 0 0

S10 200 (2.3) --- --- 0 0

S11 200 (2.3) --- --- 0 0

S13 100 (1.2) --- --- 0 0

S14 200 (2.3) --- --- 0 0

S15 200 (2.3) --- --- 0 0

S16 200 (2.3) --- --- 0 0

S17 200 (2.3) --- --- 0 0

S18 200 (2.3) --- --- 0 0

S19 200 (2.3) --- --- 0 0

S20 200 (2.3) --- --- 0 0

S21 200 (2.3) --- --- 0 0

S22 200 (2.3) --- --- 0 0

S23 300 (3.5) --- --- 0 0

Bison Total 75 (1.0) 0 0 0 0

S16 10 (0.1) 0 0 0 0

S36 45 (0.5) 0 0 0 0

S46 19 (0.2) 0 0 0 0

S56 41 (0.5) 0 0 0 0

S66 9 (0.1) 0 0 0 0

Lamb Total 700 (8.2) 0 0 1 0.1

S2 500 (5.9) 0 0 1 0.2

S3 200 (2.3) 0 0 0 0

Grand Total 8,525 (100.0) 0 0 1 0 1/A full description of AMS animal handling and welfare purchase program requirements is available here.

2/Production Dates: October 1, 2020 to September 30, 2021.

3/Data summarized from findings obtained from AMS/Livestock and Poultry Program/Quality Assessment Division audits.

4/Religious harvest (Kosher and Halal) is exempt from effective stunning calculations and is denoted with “■”.

5/Suppliers utilizing CO2 stunning (e.g. gondolas) are not evaluated for missed stuns and are denoted with “---”.

6/Low capacity establishment.