# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 11-1302 September Term, 2014 EPA-47FR45 210 EPA-76FR43 159 EPA-76FR48 208 Filed O n: Octob er 23 , 20 14 EME Hom er CityGen eratio n, L .P.,

Pet itione r
v . Environme nta l Prote ction Agency,

Respo nde nt

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- San Mig uel E lectric Coop erative, etal.,

Inte rv eno rs

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Conso lidate d with 11-1 315 , 11 -132 3, 11-1 329 , 11 -133 8, 1 1-13 40, 11 -135 0, 11-1 357 , 11 -135 8, 1 1-13 59, 11 -136 0, 11-1 361 , 11 -136 2, 1 1-13 63, 11 -136 4, 11-1 365 , 11 -136 6, 1 1-13 67, 11 -136 8, 11-1 369 , 11 -137 1, 1 1-13 72, 11 -137 3, 11-1 374 , 11 -137 5, 1 1-13 76, 11 -137 7, 11-1 378 , 11 -137 9, 1 1-13 80, 11 -138 1, 11-1 382 , 11 -138 3, 1 1-13 84, 11 -138 5, 11-1 386 , 11 -138 7, 1 1-13 88, 11 -138 9, 11-1 390 , 11 -139 1, 1 1-13 92, 11 -139 3, 11-1 394 , 11 -139 5 USCA Case #11-1302 Document #1518738 Filed: 10/23/2014 Page 1 of 5

# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 11-1302 September Term, 2014
No. 11-1427 EPA-76FR43 159 Sta te o f Geo rg ia, Pet itione r
v . Environme nta l Prote ction Agency,

Respo nde nt

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Geo rg ia Po wer Com pan y an d Mun icipal Electric Au tho rity

of Geo rg ia, Inte rv eno rs 

## No. 12-1019 September Term, 2014 EPA-76FR48 208 Sta te o f Ka nsas, Pet itione r
v . Environme nta l Prote ction Agency,

Respo nde nt

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- City of New York, e t al., Inte rv eno rs

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Conso lidate d with 11-1 333
Page 2 USCA Case #11-1302 Document #1518738 Filed: 10/23/2014 Page 2 of 5

# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 11-1302 September Term, 2014

BEFORE: Rogers, Grif f ith, a nd Kavana ugh, Circuit Ju dges O R D E R Upon con siderat ion o f

the joint mo tion of

the Sta tes o f

Ka nsas and Geo rg ia to reactivate t he SIP disap proval cases and con solidat e with (or in th e a lterna tiv e, t o coord inate w ith) case No. 1 1-13 02, et al., t he respo nse and the am end ed respo nse in supp ort, t he opp osition s to the joint mo tion, an d th e co rrected reply; EPA’s m otion to lift stay ente red De cem ber 3 0, 2 011 , th e a me nde d resp onse in su ppo rt, th e o ppo sitions t o the m otion , an d th e rep ly ; th e P ublic Hea lth In tervenors’ m otion for alte rnative relief , th e joint o ppo sitions t here to, and the reply; the m otion of Lu min antfor sum ma ry vacatur, the op positio n th ereto , an d th e rep ly ; th e m otion of T exas, et al., for sum ma ry vacatur, the op positio n th ereto , an d th e rep ly ; th e m otion of EPAto gov ern f utu re proce edin gs, the op positio ns th ereto , an d th e co nsolida ted reply; the m otion s of Sta te/L ocal Pet itione rs, Ind ustry/Labo r Petitio ners, and T exas, et al., t o govern f utu re proce edin gs, the op positio ns th ereto , an d th e rep lies; an d th e m otion s of the Sta te o f

W isconsin, the Sta te o f Lo uisiana , etal., and the City of Am es, I owa to govern f utu re proce edin gs, and the op positio ns th ereto , it is ORDERED tha t th e join t m otion to conso lidate or, in the alte rnative coo rdinat e, be den ied. It is FURTHER ORDERED tha t th e m otion s for sum ma ry vacatur b e d enie d. It is FURTHER ORDERED tha t EP A’s m otion to liftthe stay be grant ed. T he stay of the T ransp ort Rule , en tered on Decem ber 3 0, 2 011 , is he reby lifte d. It is FURTHER ORDERED tha t th is case be sched uled for oral a rg um entat 9:3 0 a .m . on W edn esda y , March 1 1, 2 015 . Itis FURTHER ORDERED tha t th e followi ng brief ing forma t an d sch edu le wi ll app ly in th ese conso lidate d ca ses:
Briefs for Pe titione rs Decem ber 1 0, 2 014 (not to e xceed 14 ,00 0 words, to be ap portio ned as t he partie s see f it)
Page 3 USCA Case #11-1302 Document #1518738 Filed: 10/23/2014 Page 3 of 5

# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 11-1302 September Term, 2014

Joint Brief

for In tervenors an d A micu s Decem ber 1 2, 2 014 Curiae in Su ppo rt of

Pe titione rs (not to e xceed 8,7 50 words) Brief for Resp ond ent Janu ary16 , 20 15 (not to e xceed 14 ,00 0 words) Briefs for In tervenors Su ppo rting Janu ary23 , 20 15 Respo nde nt (not to e xceed 8,7 50 words, to b e ap portio ned as t he partie s see f it) Reply Briefs of

Pe titione rs Februa ry 6, 201 5 (not to e xceed 14 ,00 0 words, to be ap portio ned as t he partie s see f it) T he partie s are directe d to cite t o th e p rev iously-f iled March 14, 20 12 joint app end ix

rath er th an f ile a n ew joint ap pen dix. Altho ugh th e p arties m ust cite to the previously-f iled join t ap pen dix, they are a dvised tha t th e co urt wi ll not refer to previously-f iled b riefs. In a dditio n to elect ronic f iling, the p arties a re directe d to ha nd deliver pap er copie s of the ir briefs to the Clerk’s of f ice by the da te d ue. T he partie s are also d irected to h and de liver 6 pap er cop ies of the March 1 4, 2 012 previously-f iled a ppe ndix to th e Clerk’s of

f ice on Decem ber 1 0, 2 014 . T o e nha nce the clarityof the ir briefs, th e p arties are u rg ed to lim it the use of ab breviations, includin g acronyms. W hile a cronyms m ay be used for en tities a nd statu tes with w idely recogniz ed initials, b riefs sho uld n ot cont ain a cronyms th at a re no t wi dely known. Se e D.C. Circuit Hand boo k of Practice and Proce dure s 41 (201 3); Not ice Regarding Use o f Acron y ms (D.C. Cir. Jan. 2 6, 201 0).

Page 4 USCA Case #11-1302 Document #1518738 Filed: 10/23/2014 Page 4 of 5

# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 11-1302 September Term, 2014

Beca use the brief ing sched ule is ke yed to t he dat e o f oral a rg um ent , th e co urt w ill g rant requests for extensio n o f tim e lim its on ly

for extraordina rily

com pelling reaso ns. T he briefs m ust co nta in th e d ate the case is sche dule d for oral argume nt a t th e to p o f

the cover. Se e D.C. Cir. Rule 28 (a)(8). A se para te o rder wi ll issue regarding alloca tion of oral a rg um enttim e. Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Jenn ifer M. Clark Depu ty Cl erk

Page 5 USCA Case #11-1302 Document #1518738 Filed: 10/23/2014 Page 5 of 5