23754 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2012 / Notices 

Ninestar and Epson. On February 14, 

2012, the ALJ issued an initial 

determination (ID) granting the joint 

motion. No petitions for review of the ID 

were filed. 

On February 8, 2012, Epson filed a 

motion for summary determination with 

respect to Epson’s petition for 

modification of the remedial orders. On 

February 13, 2012, Ninestar filed a nonopposition to Epson’s motion. On 

February 21, 2012, the ALJ issued a 

Recommendation on Modification of the 

Remedial Orders. Based on undisputed 

facts and the arguments of Epson and 

Ninestar, the ALJ recommended 

modifying the general exclusion order 

and cease and desist order to include 

components of ink cartridges. 

The Commission has determined to 

adopt the ALJ’s recommendation and 

modify the general exclusion order and 

the cease and desist order issued to 

Ninestar U.S. to include components of 

ink cartridges, as well as ink cartridges. 

The consolidated advisory and 

modification proceedings are 

terminated. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

sections 210.76 and 210.79 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (19 CFR 210.76, 210.79). 

By Order of the Commission. 

Issued: April 16, 2012. 

James R. Holbein, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9505 Filed 4–19–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993; Advanced Media Workflow 

Association, Inc. 

Notice is hereby given that, on March 

27, 2012, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the 

National Cooperative Research and 

Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 

et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Advanced Media 

Workflow Association, Inc. has filed 

written notifications simultaneously 

with the Attorney General and the 

Federal Trade Commission disclosing 

changes in its membership. The 

notifications were filed for the purpose 

of extending the Act’s provisions 

limiting the recovery of antitrust 

plaintiffs to actual damages under 

specified circumstances. Specifically, 

Media-Alliance, Brescia, SPAIN; and 

SuperSport, Randburg, Johannesburg, 

SOUTH AFRICA, have been added as 

parties to this venture. 

Also, MBC Group, Dubai, UNITED 

ARAB EMIRATES; National 

Geographical-Intelligence Agency, 

Herndon, VA; SAIC, McLean, VA; 

Toshiba, Wayne, NJ; John Footen 

(individual member), Lansdowne, VA; 

Robert Gummesson (individual 

member), London, UNITED KINGDOM; 

Gwynne McConkey (individual 

member), Leonia, NJ; and Salvador Villa 

Vidaler, Madrid, SPAIN, have 

withdrawn as parties to this venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and Advanced 

Media Workflow Association, Inc. 

intends to file additional written 

notifications disclosing all changes in 

membership. 

On March 28, 2000, Advanced Media 

Workflow Association, Inc. filed its 

original notification pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the Act. The Department of 

Justice published a notice in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on December 21, 2011. 

A notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on January 20, 2012 (77 FR 3007). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9523 Filed 4–19–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—3D PDF Consortium, Inc. 

Notice is hereby given that, on March 

27, 2012, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the 

National Cooperative Research and 

Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 

et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), 3D PDF Consortium, 

Inc. (‘‘3D PDF’’) has filed written 

notifications simultaneously with the 

Attorney General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing (1) the identities 

of the parties to the venture and (2) the 

nature and objectives of the venture. 

The notifications were filed for the 

purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions 

limiting the recovery of antitrust 

plaintiffs to actual damages under 

specified circumstances. 

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, 

the identities of the parties to the 

venture are PROSTEP AG, Dolivostr, 

Darmstadt, GERMANY; Adobe Systems 

Incorporated, San Jose, CA; Anark 

Corporation, Boulder, CO; Aras 

Corporation, Andover, MA; Tetra 4D, 

LLC, Seattle, WA; Tech Soft 3D, 

Berkeley, CA; and EOS Solutions 

Corporation, Rochester, MI. 

The general areas of 3D PDF’s 

planned activity are (a) to demonstrate 

the value and promote the use of 

products complying with standards 

enabling three dimensional 

representation, such as 3D PDF, the PRC 

data format, and PDF/E 2.0 

(‘‘Specifications’’); (b) to communicate 

information regarding the updating and 

the development of existing and 

additional Specifications beneficial to 

providers and consumers of three 

dimensional rendering solutions; and (c) 

to educate international standards 

committees and government bodies 

about the needs of developers and users 

of Specification-compliant products and 

services. 

In support of these purposes, 3D PDF 

may engage in some or all of the 

following activities: (a) Host committees 

that develop materials in support of 3D 

PDF’s mission; (b) operate a branding 

program based upon distinctive 

trademarks to create high customer 

awareness of, demand for, and 

confidence in products designed in 

compliance with Specifications; (c) 

create printed and electronic materials 

for distribution to members and nonmembers; (d) maintain its own Web site; 

(e) coordinate the promotion of 

Specifications among members and nonmembers, as well as create basic 

marketing promotional collateral (e.g., 

both web pages as well as tangible 

materials); (f) maintain relations with 

standard-setting organizations and 

industry consortia to promote coherence 

among Specifications; and (g) undertake 

such other activities as the Board of 

Directors may from time to time 

approve. 3D PDF is not engaged in and 

does not intend to engage in production 

activities. 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9521 Filed 4–19–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—OpenSAF Foundation 

Notice is hereby given that, on March 

30, 2012, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES