alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

•Pi

80£Z@.TTZSZ

STATE

©FF0C8AL10SSK1ESS

OF TEXAS

PEWALTY F©R

& &

&

^ ov RE 2,962-01

IARCUS TATE J

1111 LOVETT W

^

•&70O6 ^S

6

HOUSTON

^ w #=

#v

<?— ^

0006557458.

o

z

- MAR'2

MAILED FROM 2IPCODE 

49 BQT--S3B 7700S lll'l*l'tl,Mlii'Mil'irl']fil'li!r..il.l.lil.i.llfli,l.lilvliwi
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32-3

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Lexington Precision Corporation,
a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the undersigned's knowledge:

     (1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                            /s/  Dennis J. Welhouse
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Dennis J. Welhouse
                                            Senior Vice President and Chief
                                            Financial Officer
                                            (Principal Financial Officer)
                                            March 30, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification will not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference.
Court of Appeals

Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler

BILL OF COSTS

Court of Appeals No. 12-14-00227-CV

Trial Court No. 14CCL-102

Leenoris Barnes

Vs.

Shuntia Wheeler

DOCUMENTS FILED AMOUNT FEE PAID BY

Motion fee

Reporter's record

Clerk's record

Motion fee

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

Indigent

Filing

Required Texas.gov efiling fee

$10.00

$1,918.40

$75.00

$10.00

$50.00

$25.00

$100.00

$20.00

Erin L Groce

Leenoris Barnes

ERIN L. GROCE

U.Lawrence Boze

U.Lawrence Boze

U.Lawrence Boze

U.Lawrence Boze

U.Lawrence Boze

TOTAL: $2,208.40

I, Cathy S. Lusk, Clerk of the Court of Appeals, Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler,

Texas, certify that the above copy of the Bill of Costs is true and correct. GIVEN UNDER MY

HAND AND SEAL OF SAID COURT, at Tyler, this 10th day of April 2015, A.D.

CATHY LUSK, CLERK

By:_____________________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
Exhibit 21



BNS Holding, Inc.



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



Subsidiaries of the Registrant as of December 31, 2004, are as follows:



|                         |  |                               |  |                                                 |  
|------------------------ |  | ----------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------- | -
|Name of Subsidiary       |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |  | Percentage ofVoting PowerOwned by theRegistrant |  
|BNS Co.                  |  | Delaware, USA                 |  | 100                                             | %
|BNS INTERNATIONAL, LTD.* |  | Cayman Islands                |  | 100                                             | %
|Dandelion, Inc.*         |  | Delaware, USA                 |  | 100                                             | %

---

* = Held through BNS Co.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1099 

To require construction inspection functions be conducted by public employees, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2019 

Mr. SERRANO (for himself, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N

of Puerto Rico, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, and Mr. LYNCH) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require construction inspection functions be conducted 

by public employees, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safety, Efficiency, and 

5 Accountability in Transportation Projects Through Public 

6 Inspection Act of 2019’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PUBLIC INSPECTION OF PROJECTS. 

8 Section 112(b) of title 23, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1099 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(G) CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERV4 ICES.— 

5 ‘‘(i) LIMITATION.—ln carrying out a 

6 project under this section, public employees 

7 shall perform construction inspection func8 tions. 

9 ‘‘(ii) CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION

10 FUNCTIONS DEFINED.—In this subpara11 graph, the term ‘construction inspection 

12 functions’ includes construction engineer13 ing, contract administration, on-site qual14 ity control inspection, materials testing, 

15 and resident engineer and assistant resi16 dent engineer functions responsible for the 

17 acceptance or rejection of the work. 

18 ‘‘(iii) EXCEPTION.—If a State trans19 portation department or other public agen20 cy project sponsor does not have adequate 

21 existing or obtainable staff to perform the 

22 construction inspection functions, then the 

23 agency may utilize temporary consultant 

24 contracts for these services until such staff 

25 can be obtained. 


amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1099 IH

1 ‘‘(iv) TIME PERIOD.—Any temporary 

2 contracts to provide construction inspec3 tion services under this subparagraph shall 

4 not exceed the period that ends on the date 

5 that is 12 months after the date of con6 tract award.’’; 

7 (2) in paragraph (3), by adding at the end the 

8 following: 

9 ‘‘(F) CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERV10 ICES.—Public employees shall perform the con11 struction inspection functions on all design12 build projects. Such inspection functions shall 

13 be subject to the requirements of paragraph 

14 (2)(G).’’; and 

15 (3) in paragraph (4)(A), by adding at the end 

16 the following: 

17 ‘‘(v) CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERV18 ICES.—Public employees shall perform the con19 struction inspection functions on all projects 

20 that use a 2-phase contract. Such functions 

21 shall be subject to the requirements of para22 graph (2)(G).’’. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK9F9SC42PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.1****RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION**I, Michael Piazza, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Ignis Petroleum Group, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows ofthe small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the smallbusiness issuer and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) language intentionally omitted SEC Rel. 33-8760 and 34-47986  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and theaudit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant rolein the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:      November 14, 2007 /s/ Michael Piazza   Michael Piazza   President (Chief Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 76 (Thursday, April 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9489]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated 
Program Project Applications.
    Date: May 14, 2012.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, 
3121, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Paul A. Amstad, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-402-7098, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6b1b0a06181f0a0f2b05020a020f45050203450c041d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8fffeee2fcfbeeebcfe1e6eee6eba1e1e6e7a1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)


    Dated: April 13, 2012.
Anna P. Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-9489 Filed 4-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0000424

13-NOV-2013

08:42 AM
FILED FOR RECORD 

2015 APR -9 PM 3: 49 

CAUSE NO. 2014-CV-0393 

TEHESA KIEL ~ ,UAC.fil.UPE COUNTY CLERK DAVID GOAD 

Plaintiff: IN THE COUNTY COl'RT 

v. 

AT LAW 

JAMIE OSBORNE 

Defendant GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

NOTICE OF FRAlJD UPON THE COURT BY 

JUDGE ROBIN DWYER AND COlJRT STAFf' 

Plaintiff, David Goad (Goad), appeals all actions (signed orders or other) taken by 

Judge Robin Dwyer. Judge Robin Dwyer and the courts stafT manipulated with malice, the 

judicial machinery ofthe court to ensure a predetermined outCOlllt.: violating Goad's 

fundamental rights protected by the Texas and L' S Constitution. 

This notice includes, but is not limited to, the order of dismissal signed on February 

19,2015, backdated to reflect FebnJary !8,2015, and FINDINGS OF FACT AND 

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW dated March 24, 2015. 

New Braunfels, Texas 78130 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The ulldcrsigncd ecr(ilks Ihal 011 .\pril I. ~ol'::. lhi" ,,",OTlCE OF APPEAL 

NOTICE OF FRAUD lJPON THE COURT BY Jlil)(;Ji: ROBI~ l)\\YER AND COllRT STAFF "as 

SCII cd on all panics in accordance \\ illl T C\<I!'< HIIk~ of e1\ II Procedure a... sci OIl! h....rclIl belo\\ 

krclll~ R. Sloan. ESf] 


I():'iOO San Pedro.. Suite -+ \0 


San Antonio. Texas 78112 


U.S Mail 

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 04/13/2015 10:39:27 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.18



                  THE BROWN & SHARPE SAVINGS AND RETIRMENT PLAN
                             FOR MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES

                                 First Amendment
                                 ---------------

     Pursuant to Section 12.1 of The Brown & Sharpe Savings and Retirement Plan
for Management Employees (the "Plan"), the Plan is hereby amended effective as
of January 1, 1998:

          1. Section 13.1 is hereby amended by replacing the last sentence
     thereof with the following sentence:

          "At the direction of the Committee, the Trustee shall vote, in person
          or by proxy at its discretion, shares of Stock and Class B Stock held
          in the Trust for which voting instructions shall not have been
          received."

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Company has caused
     this Amendment to be signed by its duly authorized officer this 30th day of
     April, 1999.

                                           Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Company

                                           By:  _______________________________
                                                Les W. Sgnilek
                                                Treasurer
July 6th, 2015

Mr. Thomas Delaney 

Chief Executive Officer

Delaney Productions LLC

305 East Main Street, Apartment B

Clinton, CT 06413

Dear Mr. Delaney: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§§ 45.23(b), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2), 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a), 

91.203(a) and (b), 91.205(b), 91.215, 91.401–91.417 and part 21 of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your request and what you should 

do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request on behalf of Delaney Productions LLC into the public 

docket (No. FAA−2015−1541) on May 11, 2015, but we are unable to process your request 

any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 

(copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the 

following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.
2

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Hello, I just want to make it known to the USDA, that thanks to this new Hemp Farm Bill, I have been able to begin the road to self-sufficiency.  As a disabled person with limited resources and ability to work full time, I have not only found pain relief with Hemp derived CBD, but have been able to find a possible work industry for me to educate others on CBD, as well as begin a small start-up commerce for it.   The Hemp industry holds the key to economic sufficiency for many individuals like myself, who may be able to work in positions of light assembly, packing, education, etc.  If disabled individuals like myself can find a pathway to self-sufficiency through this new industry, that alone helps the economy and the underutilized workforce, that is wanting to become independent.  Thank you in advance for the opportunity to thrive economically again.  Kind regards,

Iya Brenda M-Vice
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 20, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-41628 Conference Calendar

ANTHONY LEON SUMMERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CHUCK BISCOE, Warden; BURNS, Warden; MIDER, Captain; STRUNK, Doctor; MAGRAM, Major, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-03-CV-493

-------------------- Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Anthony Leon Summers, Texas prisoner # 1130913, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for want of prosecution due to his failure to timely comply with the court’s initial partial filing fee order. For the first time on appeal, Summers alleges that he attempted to comply with the district court’s order but was unable to do so because prison officials did not timely respond to his request for assistance.No. 03-41628 -2- This court will not consider factual allegations raised for the first time on appeal. See Varnado v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED. All outstanding motions are DENIED.
D•BASF 

The Chemical Company 

By E-mail to T. Krosnic and US First Class Mail 

Krasnic.toni@Epa.gov 

EPl 

NOV 2'~ 1".( ._.. 

DOCKET CENTER 

October 31~ 2013 

,...;J 

:; 

u.Jt 

:;e 

0 

..a!!C 

N 

0 

~ 

9. 

I 

DOES NOT CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION CBIC Control Number 

Gina McCarthy, Administrator 

USEP A Headquatters 

WilliamJefferson Clinton Building 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. 

Mail Code 410 lM 

.357064 

Washington, DC 20460 

RE: US EPA 2010115 PFOA Stewardship Program 

BASF Corporation's CY 2012 Progress Repmt 

Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT -2006-0621 

Dear Administrator McCarthy: 

On behalf of BASF Corporation (BASF),· I am pleased to notify you and the Agency that BASF has · 

satisfied the terms of the PFOA Stewardship Program ("Stewardship Program") commitment made in 

2006 by one of our predecessor companies, Ciba Corporation {"Ciba," f/k/a Ciba Specialty Chemicals 

Corporation).1 

Background 

Ciba C01poration: As described in its response to former US EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson's 

January 25, 2006 PFOA Stewardship Program challenge letter to potential industry participants, Ciba 

voluntarily agreed "to [work] toward the elimination ofPFOA (C8) and its potential precursors [and 

related higher homologues] from Ciba Specialty Chemicals facilities, processes and products by no later 

than 2015.''2 

Several years prior to its acquisition by BASF during 2010, Ciba divested its fire-fighting foam business 

(i.e., fluorosurfactants and foam stabilizers) as well as its textile finishing business, leaving only its C8 

Telomer-derived paper additives and dispersion additives subject to the Stewardship Progl·ain. Ciba did 

not manufacture or introduce into commerce any products derived from "higher homologue chemicals" 

(C9 or higher). 

1 Prior to BASF~s 2010 acquisition ofCiba Specialty Chemicals Corporation, BASF did not participate in the US EPA 2010/15 

PFOA Stewardship Program. BASF does not otherwise manufacture products subject to the Stewardship Program. 

2 A copy ofCiba's February 28. 2006 commitment letter to former US EPA Administrator Johnson is attached. 

1
BE Sugarbeet Crop Summary

BE Sugarbeet Events in the Food Supply

BE Event Trait Producing 

Countries Comments FDA Review

T-120-7 herbicide 

tolerance

Canada and United 

States

Trade name: 

Liberty LinkTM BNF-038

GTSB77 herbicide 

tolerance

Canada and United 

States BNF-056

H7-1 herbicide 

tolerance

Canada and United 

States

Trade name: 

Roundup ReadyTM BNF-090

BE Sugarbeet Production

BE sugar beets are produced in only two countries: Canada and the United States. Adoption 

rates are above 90% in both countries (USDA-ERS, 2016); all sugar beets produced in these two 

countries should be presumed to be BE sugar beets.

Only event H7-1 is in commercial production. The other two events were never 

commercialized.

BE Sugarbeet Food Safety Reviews

FDA has completed three biotechnology consultations for BE Sugarbeet (FDA, 2018). Food 

safety reviews for BE sugarbeet event H7-1 have also been completed by Australia, Canada, 

China, Colombia, the European Union, Japan, New Zealand, the Philippines, the Russian 

Federation, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan (ISAAA, 2017).

In the United States, about 55 percent of the domestic sugar supply was produced using 

sugarbeets in 2013, with the remaining 45 percent produced using sugarcane (ERS, 2016b).

References

FDA (2018) Biotechnology Consultations on Food from GE Plant Varieties

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fdcc/?set=Biocon

ISAAA (2017) Global Status of Commercialized Biotech-GM Crops – 2017

USDA-ERS (2016a) The Adoption of Genetically Engineered Alfalfa, Canola and Sugarbeets in the 

United States.

USDA-ERS (2016b) Sugars & Sweeteners, Background.