alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Electronic Docket Index for [EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 201 6

- 0 322 ]

Approval of California State Implementation Plan Revisions; Butte County Air Quality

Management District; Stationary Source Permits

I. SIP Submittal Documents

I

- A SIP submittal letter from CARB, Rule 204, dated November 6, 2014 I

- B Rule 400

– Permit Requirements , adopted April 24, 2014 I

- C Rule 401

– Permit Exemptions

, adopted on April 24, 2014 I

- D Rule 432

– Federal New Source Review

, adopted on April 24, 2014 I

- E Butte County AQMD Staff Report, dated April 24, 2014

II. Federal Register Notice s 1

I I

- A 37 FR 1085 1 ( May 31, 19 72) Approval of Rules 4

- 4 and 405

I I

- B 42 FR 35314 (July 8, 1977) Recommended Policy on Control of Volatile Organic Compounds I I

- C 52 FR 3226 ( February 3, 19 87) Approval of Rules 401, 402, 406, 407, 420 & 421 II

- D 57 FR 13498 ( April 16, 19 92) Title I General Preamble I I

- E 66 FR 21875 ( May 2, 2001 ) Approval of Rules 403 and 424) I I

- F 68 FR 61248 (October 27, 2003) RMRR I I

- G 77 FR 71551 ( December 3, 2012 ) 1997 Ozone II

- H 78 FR 55225 ( September 10, 2013 ) 24

- hr PM2.5 II

- I 78 FR 55225 (September 10, 2013) Butte County PM2.5 CDD II

- J 80 FR 15340 (March 23, 2015) PM2.5 Subpart 4 II

- K 80 FR 1816 ( January 13, 2015 ) SJV Proposed PM2.5 Plan approval II

- L 80 FR 33195 ( June 11, 2015 ) Approval of Rule 101 II

- M 80 FR 69880 (November 12, 2015) Approval of Rule 1107 II

- N 81 FR 26697 ( May 4, 2016 ) 2008 Ozone

III. Other Relevant Documents

III

- A Submittal Completeness Letter for Rule s 400, 401 and 432

, December 18 , 2014 III

- B Technical Support Document for BCAQMD Rules 400, 401 & 432, August 5 , 201 6 III

- C BCAQMD Rule 431

– Emission Reduction Credits and Banking III

- D BCAQMD Rule 1101

– Title V

– Federal Operating Permits

III

- E BCAQMD Rule 4

- 4

– Exemptions from Permit Requirement (SIP approved 5 / 31 / 72)

1 All Federal Register notices listed after 1993 are available on

- line at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collection.action?collectionCode=FRIII

- F Butte County Rules 401, 402, 403, 405, 406, 407, 420, 421 and 424 (Text of SIP approved version) III

- G ARB 2008 Ozone Emission I nventory, submitted on July 17, 2014 III

- H 1996 TSD for South Coast Rulemaking III

- I District Letter dated March 25, 2016 re: Clarification of SIP Submittal for Permit Regulations III

- J District Letter dated March 25, 2016 re: Influence of Ammonia Emissions in District Stationary Source Permitting

I V. EPA Rulemaking Documents

IV

- A Federal Register Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

, dated August 19, 2016 (XX FR XXX) IV

- B Federal Register Notice of Direct Final Rulemaking, dated Month Day Year (XX FR XXX)

Notes: 1. A copy of each document is located at the EPA Region 9 office.
Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements:

(1)   Registration Statement (Forms S-3 No. 333-127095, No. 333-125602, No.
      333-122752, No. 333-33174, No. 333-34822 and No. 333-89973) of MSGI
      Security Solutions, Inc., and

(2)   Registration Statement (Forms S-8 No. 333-121041, No. 333-94603 and No.
      333-82541) of MSGI Security Solutions, Inc.; of our report dated October
      7, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of AONet
      International S.r.l., included in this Annual Report, as amended on Form
      10-K/A for the one month period ended June 30, 2005.


/s/ Reconta Ernst & Young S.p.A.
Milan, Italy
October 28, 2005


                                       90
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 24-0137

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DAVID WARREN LAMBERT,

Defendant and Appellant

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 9, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 5 2024

08/05/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0137
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 11, 2018

No. 04-18-00432-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.L.M., B.N.M., B.M.M., Z.L.A., K.L.A., CHILDREN,

From the County Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-01-56823-CV

Honorable Michael Ventura Garcia, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The clerk’s record was due on June 18, 2018. The district clerk has filed a notification of 

late record stating that the clerk’s record has not been filed because appellant has failed to pay or 

make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and appellant is not entitled to 

appeal without paying the fee. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten 

days of the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have 

been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s 

fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal may be dismissed for want 

of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of July, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Appice QUEST Repacrully thot

TAG CART LUNG TESTOING Te,
CORB, HACK FO TPS dea Judicial
Dslict CAUT, TUCO AUANS Ua

DIRECTION WW eaving Te eaLe’s
TARE CORD,

Re?

Applicant Pas tran TAS CAUet
. TO OUST . ACDNCAM
PANS WOT ON LPIA CRA
GS fe OS $UAINQS
AY fact TO Wea Pearman, oe
ODNION TOTS PATHOW,GIUINS
ant YEceoU for G CONCIUSON.
ARDICANT PRALS AAO AIS, CUT
LUNIA NOC ATT CW tte
CDNION C2 ae mo te
Nave CONGUCAG TO CONN
KART ARDICATIONS OF Rppicamt

roe.



Agdicant CANTERAS THO Stare SUPPRESSION
OF WUITRES PRIAZ INCONSISTONT
SISIATMANT LAS Marerial in ararea
4ZiA IW Luich ApDpiicaM LAS Gacused
FP AOS Aad DRO INCOCAISANT
CIATAMNATT,LUTIGA CdS A QUEETCNNANE
ptgeae neta aaae
\ | a)
Bean Gort FAppicamt \omeas!
Cano IN TS MeMOrcum
Ce One BIS Ge ;
\ { Cc
Clee OP COMIN

CORATALA GIA LOT AMIE WHO Clezc

{ S

ragereohesheth ese OWE
ee OVC nCICA DT
Applicant cartend thar Ranas

ZCORV ON TH WOU)
ONITEL CoE HErOrEALORe:
Cun OE WU COLBA NO. BALES.

HCA LUNI GUD 4D AAS CATT
ANN IN CN AE fern tniS
CNY PO. 3



MOTION DE ER

APB. BE

Cnt ‘- 1) | oe CEIVED IN
SE eee:

BY: Abel Acosta, Clerk

TA: DAMON T. Wilson
VARTCEANO, 28BC2-F_,

DRA CER 7

Fatoecsakececs pad ON
MOON TO anend”,

Teen fib Ths | Sine re cout
=
SAG. weer CONICHON
PAL MITDINGS CPt Cer ,
cr 10 to Camere, Tamia
EXCECE. TO SASiccmt |

Tam Vou fO2. NOUR eRNice

Lansno frward FARING OM
SOW. eure TRU, C boc (ised
HUB TOQQ3



Cat Ot Ceiminal
EOOIS OF TAXIS L
tan TEXAS

Dano nivsy

NB>
icial Warvich
Rete
\NTT CALERA NUMDAZ. £28269 -F-

Motion a Barats
TOT Hoxnvante JUNG AP Sand Caurt:
Nn. MES NOLS, DATION Te WUIBON ALO )
Cove ~SNVled_ AUG Wit

NUrESveA COLee GS ACTION ANd
Mls TNIS MONON tm LATANG
PAQAIAING TO ANE LINBAEIUAC Ieaue’s
ICANT SS CAMPINEMENT .

We PDICAUT LOS GAOL |
POUCUISING 2

—“P-C- wr

pppICGNT Ce cesgentt thet Ne LUIS
DEREEO Rona YOURE SEXUAL
pemamncaae atc! INS earore 54)

CIN AXAMINING Wil, CITHAR. PILING

A HES CAB Apnlicaiian
CAENO Paler FRO HAG! CAMICHAN.

RAGE. £


Radlicaut CONFaANdES that Tidal Ceuet abused
TS CIRRRATON DY FailiNG GUbMIT GN
NARIHEN PRICING ONG NURITAN CDINION
TOME RAITION . Rial CALS Pailure
OTA ACTION Pee. PRIOR HAN (29)

Cons, CONGHIUHE A PncinO Ant
“TARO (LA WO CARIDAEPRAS /

DEENIOUSIY LINROS SWE aCTS MARvIGL
TO TRS leah GO CpphaaNtT's
CONPIRAMENT BiQace, CRIM. BRAC.
ANN AR OL CC)., ASDCant
CONUS APH CII ANEQATIAAS 10
MIS VORTION LUAAS ae |
CLOTS RXR CONTAINGEA HONING
INAU » » iW
ae aateaiee Appicanr Asctnis
HANOZAIO CART AOU COA TRA
oa AICIA Detict COURT OA ACARD
OUNTN LK Gaerne Tar WA
FOTIS, WIC NOT CONTPARIES IehLes ,
TRAE TRIAAC ALT LOIN CONC
ON HITAINGB AN Pack tO tHe

\UUiT ALDICATION
mH | Rage, 2
REGISTRATION

53883-259
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Peter E. Jokiel, certify that:
 **1.**  **I have reviewed this quarterly report on****Form 10-Q****of Specialty Underwriters’Alliance, Inc.;**  **2.**  **Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;**  **3.**  **Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;**  **4.**  **The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-****15(e)****and 15d-****15(e)****) for the registrant and have:**
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  [Intentionally Omitted];  (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

 

 **5.**  **The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):**
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: May 16, 2005                                 /s/ Peter E. Jokiel   Peter E. Jokiel        Executive Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**SENECA GAMING CORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE OFFICERS**

 

(Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SenecaGaming Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarterended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, we, John Pasqualoni, President and Chief Executive Officer, andJoseph A. D’Amato, Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Quarterly Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended,; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the QuarterlyReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operation of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented inthe Form 10-Q.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsStaff upon request.

 

 
| February 14, 2006                                                           |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                             |
| /s/ John Pasqualoni                                                              |   |
| John Pasqualoni                                                                  |
| President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)              |
|                                                                             |
| /s/ Joseph A. D’Amato                                                       |   |
| Joseph A. D’Amato                                                           |
| Senior Vice President, Finance and  Administration (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

 

The forgoing certification is being furnishedas an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of RegulationS-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and,accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
Exhibit 32.3 Certificate:

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

OF GRAY PEAKS, INC.

I, the undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer, of Gray Peaks, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does
hereby certify, to the best of his information, knowledge and belief, that (1) the Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)) and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 20, 2006



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|                                                       
|/s/ Bernard Asher                                      
|Title: President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 18

- 00160

- CR

Guillermo Rodriguez

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 432nd District Court

o f Tarrant County (1457902D )

June 28, 2018

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered t hat the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

C hief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00503-CR

OMAR SANTANA ORTIZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 56th District Court of Galveston County. (Tr. Ct. No. 10CR3184).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on May 14, 

2014. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised 

by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reversible error. 

Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered April 9, 2015.

Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Chief Justice Radack and Justices 

Brown and Lloyd.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or


Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code





In connection with the Quarterly Report of OHA Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2018 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven T. Wayne, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:August 14, 2018/s/ Steven T. WayneSteven T. WaynePresident and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

I, Svend-Olav Carlsen, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of PortalPlayer, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 10, 2005
Federal Grain Inspection Service’s 

Technology and Science Division Updates

Grain Inspection Advisory Committee
FGIS Technology and Science 

Division

• GIAC Recommendations

• Mycotoxin Test Kit Criteria

• Technology Evaluation Process

• Light Emitting Diode (LED)

• Other Activities
Mycotoxin Test Kit

• 2021 Federal Register: 

Proposed Changes to Criteria

• Receive and analyzed 

comments

• FR Notice: Response to 

Comments
Technology & Instrument 

Evaluation

• Documented process

• For official inspection

• Outcome: transparent and consistent 

approach

• FR Notice for public comment
LED Field Study

Purpose: determine if there is no 

significant difference between LED and 

currently approved fluorescent

• Corn, Soy, Wheat

• Official Agencies

• BAR 

• Result
LED Field Study

• Minimal standards for LED 

• R-Values = color rendering index

• Correlated color temperature 

(CCT)
Imaging Technology

Continue exploring R&D efforts to 

evaluate imaging technology

• FR Notice (published February 15)

• Partner with manufacturers
Other Current Events

• US Agency for International 

Development (USAID): Bureau of 

Humanitarian Assistance

• Food For Peace

• Grain-based Commodities
Other Current Events

• Dickey-john GAC2700 Moisture 

Meter

• Quality Assurance Specialist 

(QAS) Seminars: LIVE! 

• Evaluating FOSS InfratecTM NIRT
Thank you! 

Edward Jhee, Ph.D.

Director, FGIS TSD

816-702-3801

edward.m.jhee@usda.gov
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SHAWN BRITTINGHAM, §

and CHRISTOPHER STORY, § No. 477, 2014

§

Plaintiffs Below, §

Appellants, § Court Below:

§

v. § Superior Court of the 

§ State of Delaware, in and for

WILLIAM TOPPING, in his § Sussex County

capacity as Chief of Police of the §

Town of Georgetown and §

Individually; RALPH W. HOLM, § C. A. No. S11C-01-004 RFS

In his capacity as Captain of the §

Georgetown Police Department and §

Individually, and the TOWN OF §

GEORGETOWN, a municipal §

Corporation, §

§

Defendants Below, §

Appellees. §

Submitted: March 11, 2015

Decided: April 7, 2015

Before STRINE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and VALIHURA, Justices.

O R D E R

This 7th day of April 2015, the Court, having considered this matter on the 

briefs and the oral arguments of the parties, and having concluded that the same 

should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court 

in its Order of July 31, 2014; 
2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgments of the 

Superior Court be, and the same hereby are, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

 Justice