**SUPPORTING STATEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY**  **NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) (Renewal)** 
**1. Identification of the Information Collection 1(a) Title**  **of the Information Collection** NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dy eing of Fabrics and other Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) (Renewal), EPA I CR Number 2071.05, OMB Control Number 2060

- 0522 **1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract** The National Emis sion Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Printing, Coating and Dy eing of Fabrics and other Textiles were proposed on July 11, 2002 , promulgated on May 29, 2003, and amended on August 4, 2004. These regulations apply to each existing, new , or reconstructed source involved in printing, coating, slashing, dy eing or finishing of fabric and other textiles. This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 63, subpart OOOO

. In general, all NESHAP standards require initi al notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by

the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of an y startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an aff

ected facilit y, or an y period during which the monitoring s ys tem is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all affected facilities subject to NESHAP

. Any owner/operator subjec t to the provisions of this part shall maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least five years following the date of such measurements, maintenance reports, and records. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local autho rity . In the event that there is no such delegated authorit y, the reports are sent directly to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional office. Based on our consultations with industry representatives, there is an average of one affected facilities at each plant site and that each plant site has only one respondent (i.e., the owner/operator of the plant site).
Over the next three ye ars, an average of 143 respondents per ye ar will be subject to the standard , and one additional respondent per y ear will become subject to the standard. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the current Information Collection Request (I CR) without any “Terms of Clearance.”
The “Affected Public” are private sector businesses that coat fabrics and textiles. The burden to the “Affected Public” may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and2

Cost

- NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dy eing of Fabrics and Other Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) (Renewal)

. T he burden to the “Federal Government” is attributed entirely to work performed b y either F ederal emplo yees or government contractors ; this burden is found below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

- NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dy eing of Fabrics and Other T extiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) (Renewal)

. **2. Need for and Use of the Collection 2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection**  The EPA is charged under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, to establish standards of performance for each category or subcategory

of major sources and area sources of hazardous air pollutants. These standards are applicable to new or existing sources of hazardous air pollutants and shall require the maximum degree of emission reduction. Inaddition, section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require any

owner/operator subject to any requirement of this Act to: (A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports;

(C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep records on control equipment par ameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; (F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with Section 114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonabl y r equire. In the Administrator's judgment, hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from printing, coating and d yeing of fabrics and other textiles facilities cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably

be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. Therefore, the NESHAP were promulgated for this source category at 40 CFR part 63, subpart OOOO

. **2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data** The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the standard ensure compliance with the applicable re gulations which where promulgated in accordance with the Clean Air Act. The collected information is also used for targeting inspections and as evidence in legal proceedings. Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected facility ’ s ini tial capability to comply

with the emission standard. Continuous emission monitors are used to ensure compliance with the standard at all times . During the performance test a record of the operating parameters under which compliance was achieved may be rec orded and used to determine compliance in place of a continuous emission monitor.3

The notifications required in the standard are used to inform the Agency or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements of the regulations. The r eviewing authority may then inspect the source to check if the pollution control devices are properl y installed and operated , leaks are being detected and repaire d, and the standard are being met. The performance test may also be observed. The required s emiannual reports are used to determine periods of excess emissions, identify problems at the facility , verify operation/maintenance procedures and for compliance determinations.
**3. Non**
**- duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria**  The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under 40 CFR part 63, subpart OOOO

. **3(a) Non**
**- duplication**  If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is sent directl y to the appropriate EPA regional office. Otherwise, the infor mation is sent directl y to the delegated state or local agency . If a state or local agency has adopted its own similar standards to implement the Federal standards, a cop y of the report submitted to the state or local agency can be sent to the Administrat or in lieu of the report required by the Federal standards. Therefore, duplication does not exists. **3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB** An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this I CR was published in the F ederal Register ( 76 FR 26900 ) on May 9, 2011

. No comments were received on the burden published in the Federal Register

. **3(c) Consultations** The Agency

has consulted i ndustry

experts and internal data sources to project the number of affected facilities and industry growth over the next three years. The primary source of information as reported by industry , in compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting provisions in the standard, is the Online Tracking Information Sy stem (OTIS ) which is operated and maintained b y EPA's Office of Compliance. OTI S is EPA ’ s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of all compliance data. The growth rate for the industry is based on our consultations with the Agency ’s i nternal industry experts.
Industry trade associations and other interested parties were provided an opportunity to comment on the burden associated with the standard as it was being developed and the standard has been previously

reviewed to determine the minimum information needed for compliance purposes. During the development of the current ICR, we contacted : 1) the National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO) , at (202) 822

- 8026 ; and 2) the National Textile Association4

(NTA) , at ( 617 ) 542

- 8220

. It is our policy

to respond after a thorough review of comments received since the last ICR renewal as well as those submitted in response to the f irst Federal Register n otice. In this case, no comments were received. **3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection**  Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards. Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful techniques to ensure that g ood operation and maintenance practices are applied and emission limitations are met. If the information required by these standards was collected less frequentl y, the proper operation and maintenance of control equipment and the possibility

of detecting violations would be less likely

. **3(e) General Guidelines**
T hese reporting or recordkeeping requirements do not violate any of the regulations promulgated b y OMB under 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5. These standards require the respondents to maintain all records, including reports and notifications for at least five years. This is consistent with the General Provisions as applied to the standards. EPA believes that the five

- ye ar records retention requirement is consistent the Part 70 permit program and the five

- ye ar statute of limitations on which the permit program is based. T he retention of records for five ye ars allow s EPA to establish the compliance history of a source , an y pattern of non - compliance and to determine the appropriate level of enfor cement action. EPA has found that the most flagrant violators have violations extending beyond five ye ars. In addition, EPA would be prevented from pursuing the violators due to the destruction or nonexistence of essential records

. **3(f) Confidentiality** Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B

- Confidentiality of Business Information (CBI) (see 40 CFR 2; 4 1 FR 36902, September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979). **3(g) Sensitive Questions**
T he reporting or recordkeeping requirements in the standard do not include sensitive questi ons.5

**4. The Respondents and the Information Requested 4(a) Respondents/SIC Codes**  The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are printing, coating and dy eing of fabrics and other textiles facilities

. The United States Standard Industrial Classification (SI C) codes for the respondents affected by the standards, which corresponds to the North American Industry Classification S ys tem (NAICS) codes, are listed below for printing, coating and d yeing of fabrics and other textiles facil ities

**Standard (40 CFR Pa**  **rt 63,**  **Subpart OOOO)**  **SIC Codes NAICS**  **Codes** Broadwoven Fabric Mills, Cotton 2211 313210 Broadwoven Fabric Mills, Manmade Fiber and Silk 2221 313210 Broadwoven Fabric Mills, Wool (including dy eing and finishing) 2231 313210 Textile Goods, NEC (broadwoven fabrics of jute, linen, hemp, and ramie and hand woven fabrics) 2299 313210 Narrow Fabric and Other Smallware Mills; Cotton, Wool, silk and Manmade Fiber 2241 313221 Textile Goods, NEC (narrow woven fabric of jute, linen, hemp, and ramie) 2299 313221 Knitting Mills, NEC (knitting weft fabric and fabricating textile products, such as bedspreads, curtains, or towels 2259 313241 Broadwoven Fabric Mills, Wool (wool broadwoven fabric finishing without weaving fabric) 2231 313311 Finishers of Broadwoven Fabrics of Cotton 2261 313311 Finishers of Broadwoven Fabrics of Manmade Fiber and Silk 2262 313311 Broadwoven Fabric Mills, Wool (wool fabric, except broadwoven, finishing without weaving fabric) 2231 313312 Knit Outerwear Mills (dyeing and finishing knit outerwear without knitting outerwear) 2253 313312 Knit Underwear and Nightwear Mills (d yeing and finishing underwear and nightwear without knitting garments) 2254 313312 Weft Knit Fabric Mills (finishing weft fabric without knitting weft fabric) 2257 313312 Lace and Warp Fabric Mills (Finishing lace or warp fabric without knitting lace or warp fabric) 2258 313312 Finishers of Textiles, NEC (except linen fabric finishing) 2269 313312 Thread Mills (finishing thread without manufacturing thread) 2284 313312 Textile Goods, NEC (finishing hard fiber thread and y arn without manufacturing thread or yarn) 2299 3133126
**Standard (40 CFR Pa**  **rt 63,**  **Subpart OOOO)**  **SIC Codes NAICS**  **Codes** Coated Fabrics, Not Rubberized 2295 313320 Fabricated Rubber Products, NEC (rubberizing fabric or purchased textile products) 3069 313320 Carpets and Rugs 2273 314110 Rubber and Plastics Hose and Belting 3052 326220 Gaskets, Packing, and Sealing Devices 3053 339991 Fabricated Rubber Products, NEC (rubberizing fabric or purchased textile products) 3069 313320
**4(b) Information Requested (i) Data Items** 
In this ICR , all the data that are recorded or reported is required b y the NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO).
A source must make the following reports:
**Notifications** Initial notification 63.9(b), 63.4310(b) Notification of intent to construction/reconstruction 63.9(b)(4), 63.4310 Notification of anticipated startup 63.9(b)(4), 63.4310 Notification of actual startup 63.9(b)(4), 63.4310 Request for extension of compliance date 63.9(c), 63.4283 Notification of performance test 63.9(e), 63.6310 Notification of compliance status 63.9(h)(2), 63.4310 Continuous monitoring sy stem 63.9(h) **Reports** Performance test report 63.10(d)(2), 63.4311 Startup, shutdown, malfunction (SSM) report 63.6.(e)(3), 63.4311 Excess emissions or no excess emissions report 63.10(e)(3), 63.4311 A source must keep the following records: **Recordkeeping** Record of startup, shutdown, and malfunctions 63.6(e)(3), 63.4311 Records are required to be retained for five years 63.10(b)(2)7

Electronic Reporting
Some of the r espondents are using monitoring equipment that automatically records parameter data. Although personnel at the affected facility must still evaluate the data, internal automation has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordke eping at a plant site. Also, regulatory

agencies in c ooperation with the respondents continue to create reporting sy stems to transmit data electronically . However, electronic reporting s ys tems are still not widely used. At this time, it is estimated th at approximately 33 percent of the respondents use electronic reporting.

**(ii) Respondent Activities**

**Respondent Activities** Read instructions. Perform initial performance test, and repeat performance tests if necessary

. Write the notifications and reports listed above. Enter information required to be recorded above. Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and sy stems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of processing and maintaining information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of disclosing and providing information. Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information. Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information. Currently sources are using monitoring and reporting equipment that provide parameter data in an automated way e.g., continuous parameter monitoring s ys tem. Although personnel at the source still need to evaluate the data, this type of monitoring equipment has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping. **5. The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management**  **5(a) Agency Activities** EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the acquisition, analysis, storage, and distribution of the required information.8 **Agency Activities** Observe initial performance tests and repeat performance tests if necessary

. Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports, and excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry

. Audit facility

records. Input, anal yz e, and maintain data in the Online Tracking Information Sy stem (OTI S). **5(b) Collection Methodology and Management** Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority could inspect the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are properl y installed and operated. Performance test reports are used b y the Agency to discern a source ’ s initial capab ility to compl y with the emission standard. Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs . The semiannual reports are used for problem identification, as a check on source operat ion and maintenance, and for compliance determinations.
In formation contained in the reports is entered into OTI S which is operated and maintained by

EPA's Office of Compliance. OT IS is EPA ’ s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for approximately 125,000 industrial and government

- owned facilities. EPA uses the OTI S for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement b y local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters. EPA and its dele gated Authorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data. The records required b y this regulation must be retained by the owner/operator for five ye ars. **5(c) Small Entity Flexibility** A majority

of the respondents are large entities (i.e., large businesses). However, the impact on small entities (i.e., small businesses) was taken into consideration during the development of the regulation. Due to technical considerations involving the process operations and the ty pes of control equipment empl oy ed, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are the same for both small and large entities. The Agency considers these to be the minimum requirements needed to ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce them further for small entities. To the extent that larger businesses can use economies of scale to reduce their burden, the overall burden will be reduced. **5(d) Collection Schedule** The specific frequency

for each information collection activity within this request is shown below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

- NESHAP for Printing, Coating9

and Dy eing of Fabrics and Other Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) (Renewal). **6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection** Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart included in this I CR. The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of burden under the Paper work Reduction Act. Wher ever appropriate, specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified. Responses to this information collection are mandatory

. The Agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it display s a currently valid OMB Control Number. **6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden** The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these recordkeeping and reporting requirement s is estimated to be 21,2 71 ( Tota l Labor Hours from Table 1 below ). T hese hours are based on Agency studies and background documents from the development of the regulation, Agency

knowledge and experience with the NESHAP program, the previousl y approved ICR, and an y comments received. **6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs (i) Estimating Labor Costs**  This I CR uses the following labor rates: Managerial $1 21

. 42 ($5 7

. 82 + 110%) Technical $ 99.14 ($4 7

. 21 + 110%) Clerical $4 9

. 81 ($2 3

. 7 2 + 110%) These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 2011 , “ Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group. ” The rates are from column 1, “ Total compensation. ” The rates have been increased b y 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employ ed by private industry

. **(ii) Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs** The ty pe of industry

costs associated with the information collection activities in the subject standard(s) are both labor costs which are addressed elsewhere in this I CR and the costs associated with continuous monitoring. Th e capital/startup costs are one

- time costs when a facility becomes subject t o the regulation. The annual operation and maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitor(s) and other costs such as photocop ying and postage.10 **(iii) Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs Capital/Startup vs. Operati**  **on and Maintenance (O&M) Costs** (A) Continuous Monitoring Device (B)

Capital/Startup Cost for One Respondent (C)

Number of New Respondents (D)

Total Capital/Startup Cost, (B X C) (E)

Annual O&M Costs for One Respondent (F)

Number of Respondents with O&M (G)

Total O&M, (E X F)

Parametric mo nitoring (contractor) $2,953 1 $2,953 $26 143 $3,718
The total capital/startup costs for this I CR are $2,953. This is the total o f column D in the above table. The total operation and maintenance (O& M) costs for this I CR are $3,718. This is the total of column G.

The average annual cost for capital/startup and operation and maintenance costs to industry over the next three years of the IC R is estimated to be $6,671

. These are recordkeeping costs. **6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost** The only costs to the Agency

are those costs associated with anal ys is of the reported information. EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program includes activities such as the examination of records m aintained by the respondent s, periodic inspection of sources of emissions, and the publication and distribution of collected information. The average annual Agency cost during the three y ears of the ICR is estimated to be $50,016

. This cost is based on the average hourl y labor rate as follows: Managerial $ 6 2.27 (GS

- 13, Step 5, $ 3 8. 92 + 60% ) Technical $ 4 6

. 21 (GS

- 12, Step 1, $ 28. 88 + 60% ) Clerical $2 5.01 (GS

- 6, Step 3, $ 15. 63 + 60% ) These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) , 20 1 1 General Schedule , which excludes locality

rates of pay

. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees
. Details upon which this estimate is based appear below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

- NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dy eing of Fabrics and Other Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) (Renewal).11

**6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs** Based on our research for this I CR, on average over the next three ye ars, approximately 14 2 existing respondents will be subject to the standard. It is estimated that an additional one respondents per ye ar will become subject. The overall average number of respondents, as shown in the table below , is 143 per year. The number of respondents is calculated using the following table that addresses the three ye ars covered b y this ICR.
**Number of Respondents**

Year (A) Number of Ne w Respondents 1 (B)

Number of Existing Respondents (C)

Number of Existing Respondents that keep records but do not submit reports (D) Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents (E)

Number of Respondents (E=A+B+C

- D)

1 1 141 0 0 142
2 1 142 0 0 143
3 1 143 0 0 144 Average 1 142 0 0 143 1 New respondent include sources with constructed, reconstructed and modified affected facilities.

. C olumn D is subtracted to avoid double

- counting respondents

. As shown above, the average Number of Respondents over the three ye ar period of this ICR is 143

. The total number of annual responses per ye ar is calculated using the following table:12
**T otal Annual Responses**  (A) Information Collection Activity (B) Number of Respondents (C)

Number of Responses (D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports (E)

Total Annual Responses E=(BxC)+D

Initial notification 1 1 0 1 Application of construction/reconstruction 1 1 0 1 Notification of anticipated startup 1 1 0 1 Notification of actual startup 1 1 0 1 Notification of compliance status 1 1 0 1 Notification of performance test 1 1 0 1 Performance test report 1 1 0 1 Report of monitoring exceedances 6.9 2 0 13.8 Report of no excess emissions 62.1 2 0 124.2 Startup, shutdown, malfunction report 6.9 2 0 13.8 Report of compliance deviation 7.4 2 0 14.8 Report of no compliance deviations 66.6 2 0 133.2 Total 30 6.8 The number of Total Annual Responses is 30 7 (rounded)

. The total annual labor costs are $2,038,122. Details regarding these estimates may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

- NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dy eing of Fabrics and Other Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart O OOO) (Renewal). **6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables** The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the respondents and the Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectivel y, and summarized below. **(i) Respondent Tally** The total annual labor hours are 21,2 71 , at a cost of $2,038,122

. Details regarding these estimates may

be found below in Table 1 : Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

- NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) (Renewal)

. Furthermore, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 69 hours per response

. The total annual capital/startup and O&M costs to the regulated entity are $6,671

. The cost calculations are detailed in Section 6(b)(iii), Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs.13 **(ii) The Agency Tally** The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three y ears is estimated to be 1,110 labor hours at a cost of $50,016 . See below Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

- NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dy eing of Fabrics and Other Textiles (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) (Renewal)

. **6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden** There is an adjustment increase in the total estimated burden hours and costs for both the respondents and the Agency as currentl y identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved Burdens. This increase is not due to any program changes. The increase in the burden and co st reflects a growth in the respondent universe since the last I CR renewal, and an increase in labor rates. T his ICR uses updated labor rates in estimating the costs for all labor categories

. **6(g) Burden Statement** The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 69 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended b y persons to generate , maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and s ys tems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosi ng and providing information; adjust the existing way s to compl y with any previously

applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it display s a valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Numbers for EPA regulations are listed at 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. To comment on the Agency 's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this I CR under Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 20 11

- 02 63

. An electronic version of the public docket is available at http://www.regulations.gov/ which may be used to obtain a copy

of the draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically

. When in the sy stem , select “search,” then key in the d ocket ID number identified in this document. The documents are also available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334 , 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington , DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holiday s. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744, and the telephone14

number for the docket center i s (202) 566

- 17 52

. Also, you can send comments to the Office of In formation and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 20 11

- 02 63 and OMB Control Number 2060

- 0 522 in any correspondence. **Part B of the Supporting Statement** This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this information.15

**Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost**

**– NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of**  **Fabrics and Other Textiles (40**  **CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) (Renewal)**

**Burden item (A)**  **Person**
**- hours per**  **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrence**  **per respondent**  **per year (C)** 

**Person**
  ** hours per** **respondent per year**  **(C=AxB) (D)** 

**Respondents per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technical Person** 
**- hours per**  **year (E=CxD)**  **(F)**

**Managem ent**  **person -**  **hours per year**  **(Ex0.05) (G)** 

**Clerical person**  **- hours**  **per year (Ex0.1)**  **(H)**

**Cost, $ b** 

1. Applications N/A 2. Survey and Studies N/A 3. Reporting Requirements A. Read instructions 4 1 4 1 4 0.2 0.4 $440.77 B. Required activities Initial oxidizer performance test **c, e** 280 1 280 1 280 14 28 $30,853.76 Repeat oxidizer performance test **c, e, f** 280 1 280 0.2 56 2.8 5.6 $6,170.75 Initial capture performance test **c, e** 215 1 215 1 215 10.75 21.50 $23,691.28 Repeat capture performance test **c, e, f** 215 1 215 0.2 43 2.15 4.3 $4,738.26 Startup, shutdown, malfunction plan **c** 40 1 40 1 40 2 4 $4,407.68 Solvent recovery system compliance determination **c, p** 4 12 48 13.8 662.4 33.12 66.24 $72,991.18 Emission rate limit compliance determination 4 12 48 143 6,864 343.2 686.4 $756,357.89 Coordination with suppliers **g** 40 1 40 143 5,720 286 572 $630,298.24 C. Create information See 4B D. Gather existing information See 4B E. Write report Initial notification c 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $220.38 Notification of construction/ reconstruction **c** 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $220.38 Notification of anticipated startup **c** 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $220.38 Notification of actual startup **c** 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $220.38 Notification of compliance status c 4 1 4 1 4 0.2 0.4 $440.7716

**Burden item (A)**  **Person**
**- hours per**  **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrence**  **per respondent**  **per year (C)** 

**Person**
  ** hours per** **respondent per year**  **(C=AxB) (D)** 

**Respondents per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technical Person** 
**- hours per**  **year (E=CxD)**  **(F)**

**Managem ent**  **person -**  **hours per year**  **(Ex0.05) (G)** 

**Clerical person**  **- hours**  **per year (Ex0.1)**  **(H)**

**Cost, $ b** 

Notification of performance test **c, e** 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $220.38 Performance test report **c, e**  40 1 40 1 40 2 4 $4,407.68 Report of monitoring exceedances **c, h, k**  16 2 32 6.9 220.8 11.04 22.08 $24,330.39 Report of no excess emissions **c, i, k** 8 2 16 62.1 993.6 49.68 99.36 $109,486.77 Startup, shutdown, malfunction report **c, j, k** 8 2 16 6.9 110.4 5.52 11.04 $12,165.20 Report of compliance deviation **d, k , l**  16 2 32 7.4 236.8 11.84 23.68 $26,093.47 Report of no compliance deviations **d, k ,**  **m** 8 2 16 66.6 1,065.6 53.28 106.56 $117,420.60 **Subtotal for Reporting Requirements 19,050**  **.44** 4. Recordkeeping Requirements A. Read instructions See 4B B. Plan activities N/A C. Implement activities N/A D. Develop record system N/A E. Time to enter information Records of all information required by standards **n** 0.25 52 13 143 1,859 92.95 185.9 $204, 846

. 93 F. Time to train personnel N/A G. Time to adjust existing ways to comply with previously applicable requirements N/A H. Time to transmit or disclose information **o** 0.25 2 0.5 143 71.5 3. 58 7.15 $7, 878

. 73 I. Time for audits N/A **Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements 2,**  **220 .08**  **TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (rounded)**  **21, 2**  **71 $2,**  **03 8**  **, 122** 17

**Assu mptions:**  a We have assumed that the average number of respondents that will be subject to the rule will be 143, w hich equates to 69 coat ing and printing sources, and 74 slashing, dyeing, and finishing sources. There will be one additional new source per year that will become subject to the rule over the three

- year period of this ICR. b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $121.42 per hour for Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor; $99.14 per hou r for Technical labor, and $49.81 per hour for Clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 2011, “Table 2: Civ ilian Workers, by Occupational and Industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total Compensation.” The rates have been incre ased by 110% to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry. c This applies only to coating and printing facilities. d This applies only to slashing, dyeing and finishing facilities. e Occurs one time for new sources and involves one

- time startup costs associated with initial compliance determination and acquisition, installation, and utilization of technology and systems needed to support recordkeeping and reporting. f It is assumed that 20 percent of respondents will have to repeat performance tests. g We have assumed that it will take 40 hours for each respondent to coordinate with suppliers. h We have assumed that 10 percent of respondents will report monitoring exceedances. i We have assumed that 90 percent of respondents will report no excess emissions. j We have assumed that 10 percent of respondents will file a startup, shutdown, malfunction reports. k Semiannual reports are required. l It is assumed that 10 percent o f respondents will report compliance deviations. m It is assumed that 90 percent of respondents will report no compliance deviations. n It is assumed that all of the respondents will be required to record information on a weekly basis. o It is assumed th at respondents will be required to transmit/disclose information on a semiannual basis. p It is assumed that 20 percent of the coating and printing facilities will use solvent recovery equipment (0.2x69=13.8).18

**Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cos t** 
**- NESHAP for Printing, Coating and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textiles**  **(40 CFR Part 63, Subpart OOOO) (Renewal)**

**Activity (A)**  **EPA person**  **** **hours per occurrence**  **(B)**

**No. of occurrences**  **per plant per year**  **(C)**

**EPA person hours per**  **plant per year**  **(C=AxB) (D)** 

**Plants per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(E=CxD) (F)** 

**Managem ent**  **person -**  **hours per year**  **(Ex0.05) (G)** 

**Clerical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(Ex0.1) (H)** 

**Cost, $ b** 

1. Initial performance test **c** 495 1 495 1 495 24.75 49.5 $25,653.13 2. Repeat performance test preparations **c, e** 4 0.1 0.4 1 0.4 0.02 0.04 $20.73 3. Repeat performance test **c, e** 495 0.1 49.5 1 49.5 2.48 4.95 $2,565.31 4. Report Review Notification of applicability 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $103.65 Notification of construction/ r econstruction 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $103.65 Notification of anticipated s tartup 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $103.65 Notification of actual startup 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $103.65 Notification of initial performance test **c** 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $103.65 Notification of compliance status **c** 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 0.2 $103.65 Review of initial performance test report **c** 8 1 8 1 8 0.4 0.8 $414.60 Review of repeat performance test report **c, f** 8 0.1 0.8 1 0.8 0.04 0.08 $41.46 Review of excess emissions report **c, g** 8 1 8 6.9 55.2 2.76 5.52 $2,860.71 Review of no excess emissions report **c, h** 2 1 2 62.1 124.2 6.21 12.42 $6,436.60 Review of startup, shutdown, malfunction reports **c, i** 2 1 2 13.8 27.6 1.38 2.76 $1,430.361 9

**Activity (A)**  **EPA person**  **** **hours per occurrence**  **(B)**

**No. of occurrences**  **per plant per year**  **(C)**

**EPA person hours per**  **plant per year**  **(C=AxB) (D)** 

**Plants per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(E=CxD) (F)** 

**Managem ent**  **person -**  **hours per year**  **(Ex0.05) (G)** 

**Clerical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(Ex0.1) (H)** 

**Cost, $ b** 

Review of com pliance deviations report **d, j** 8 1 8 7.4 59.2 2.96 5.92 $3,068.01 Review of no compliance deviations reports **d, k** 2 1 2 66.6 133.2 6.66 13.32 $6,903.02 **TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (rounded)**  **1,110 $50,016** 

**Assu mptions:**  a We have assumed that the average number of respondents that will be subject to the rule will be 143, w hich equates to 69 coat ing and printing sources, and 74 slashing, dyeing, and finishing sources. There will be one additional new source per year that will become subject to the rule over the three

- year period of this ICR. b This cost is based on the following labor rates w hich incorporate a 1.6 benefits multiplication factor to account for government overhead expenses: Managerial rate of $62.27 (GS

- 13 , Step 5, $38.92 x 1.6), Technical rate of $46.21(GS

- 12, Step 1, $28.88 x 1.6), and Clerical rate of $25.01 (GS

- 6, Step 3, $15.63 x 1.6). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) “2011 General Schedule” which excludes locality rates of pay. c This applies only to coating and printing facilities. d This applies only to slashing, dyeing and finishing facilities. e We have assumed that 10 percent of new sources will have to repeat performance test preparations and testing. f Assume that 10 percent of new sources will review the repeat performance test report. g We have assumed that 10 percent of respondents will be engaged in the revie wing of excess emissions reports. h We have assumed that 90 percent of respondents will be engaged in the revie wing of no excess emissions reports. i We have assumed that 20 percent of respondents will have to review the startup, shutdown, malfunction reports. j We have assumed that 10 perce nt of respondents will review the compliance deviations report. k We have assumed that 90 percent of respondents will review the no compliance deviations report.