alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
lANCER. LEFLEUR 

DIRECTOR 

Ms. Heather McTeer Toney 

ADE 

Alabama Department of Environmental Management 

adem.alabama.gov 

1400 Coliseum Blvd. 36110.2400 • Post Office Box 301463 

Montgomery, Alabama 36130.1463 

(334) 271-7700 • FAX (334) 271-7950 

August 6, 2014 

Regional Administrator, U.S. EPA, Region 4 

Atlanta Federal Center 

61 Forsyth Street, S.W. 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 

Dear Ms. Toney: 

r 

r ~ 

~ 

:=- -

c: 

c;, 

"0 

--

RoBERT J. BENTLEY 

GOVERNOR 

On March 3, 2014, I sent a letter to you on behalf of the Governor of the State of Alabama which 

provided the State's recommendations regarding the extent of nonanainment areas for the 2012 primary 

annual fine particle (PM2.5) national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). In this letter, based on 

ambient monitoring data collected during the 2011-2013 monitoring periods, we requested that all 

counties in the State be designated as attainment. On August 4, 2014, we were informed by your stafl'that 

the designations for the Columbus, Georgia, area, including Russell County, Alabama, would be delayed 

beyond the December 2014 designation deadline due to invalid monitoring data from the Columbus 

monitors. 

The intent of this letter is to respectfully request that EPA proceed with the requested attainment 

designation for Russell County in December 2014 based on Alabama's validated 2011-2013 PM2.5 data 

for the Russell County PM2.5 monitor. 

Once valid 2014 data is available from the State of Georgia for the Columbus area monitors, we 

understand that EPA will evaluate how the area should be designated. Should the data show compliance 

with the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS, the Columbus area could then be designated as attainment. If the 

data shows violations of the NAAQS, it is understood that EPA may need to reevaluate the attainment 

designation for the area. 

Should you require additional information, please contact Mr. Ron Gore of the ADEM Air 

L)ivision al 334-271-7868. 

LRLIADH/ghe 

cc: Beverly Banister, EPA Region 4 

Blrmlngl1am llrBJic:h 

110 Vulcan Road 

Birmingham, AL 35209-4702 

(205) 942-6168 

(205) 941·1603 (FAX) 

Decatur Branch 

2715 Sandlin Road. S. W. 

Decatur, AL 35603-1333 

(256) 353-1713 

(256) 340.9359 (FAX) 

Sincerely, 

~I(~ LanceR. Lef leur 

Director 

Mobile Branch 

2204 Perimeter Road 

Mobile, AL 36615-1131 

(251) 450.3400 

(251) 479-2593 (FAX) 

MoiJIIe.Coastal 

3664 ~llllm.SU!eB 

Mobile, Al36608 

(251) 304-1176 

(251) 304-1189 (FAX)
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 76 (Thursday, April 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9456]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>13054 and <greek-i>13055]


West Virginia Disaster Number WV-00027

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of West Virginia (FEMA-4061-DR), dated 03/
22/2012.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, Mudslides, and Landslides.
    Incident Period: 03/15/2012 through 03/31/2012.
    Effective Date: 03/31/2012.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/21/2012.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/24/2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of West Virginia, dated 03/22/2012 is hereby 
amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 
03/15/2012 and continuing through 03/31/2012.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-9456 Filed 4-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**Exhibit 35.2**

​

**Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.**

​

I, Steven N. Owenson, Senior Vice President and Finance Director of Deere Credit Services, Inc., state:

​

A review of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s activities for the period from October 31, 2022 through October 29, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 16, 2022 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables LLC and John Deere Owner Trust 2022 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.    

​

| ​               | ​                     | ​                                    |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Date: January 9, 2024 | Deere Credit Services, Inc. |
| ​               | ​                     | ​                                    |
| ​               | By:                         | */s/ Steven N. Owenson*                    |
| ​               | ​                     | Steven N. Owenson                          |
| ​               | ​                     | Senior Vice President and Finance Director |
| ​               | ​                     | ​                                    |
| ​               | ​                     | ​                                    |

​

​

----
-iEBHSB

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

.. P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

'OOe

IUBMESB

' STATE. OF TEXAS'-'

PENALTY FOR

3/6/2015 PK8VATEUSE- \s _ TATE, MARCUS Jr. Tr. Ct. No.J^829Tl!8;Ai

^"S[

02 1R

0006557458 MAR 11 2015

MAILED FROM ZlpW.R;i82?962-01

On this day, the application for 11 07 Writ of Habeas Corpus has been received

and presented to the Court.

Abel Acosta, Clerk &

MARCgSfSWEJR. ^JflriwEJ

11H^&PVETT

TON.T & •&

UTF

.,ii|»i|H.-.i1!|iJi1|H^»l'A'pilill»HHM»!HHl'l,i 1
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Peter J. Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 , fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc.





/s/ Peter J. AndersonName:Peter J. AndersonTitle:Chief Financial OfficerDate:August 6, 2010
ACCEPTED12-14-00305-CRTWELFTH COURT OF APPEALSTYLER, TEXAS4/6/2015 4:47:44 PMCATHY LUSKCLERK
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, David D’Addario, certify that: 

1. Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wise Metals Group LLC; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 15, 2006
T y p e A p p r o v a l s
Exhibit 32.1



Certification
of THE CHIEF Executive Officer

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Keiichi Suzuki, Chief Executive Officer of AP Acquisition
Corp (the “Company”), hereby certify, that, to my knowledge:



|1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 29, 2022



| | /s/ Keiichi Suzuki           
| | -----------------------------
| | Keiichi Suzuki               
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 69 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 69

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   require the United States and the States to jointly ensure a high-
       quality education to all persons within the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 26, 2019

  Mr. DeSaulnier submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   require the United States and the States to jointly ensure a high-
       quality education to all persons within the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The United States, the States, Indian Tribes, and 
territories shall jointly ensure a high-quality education to all 
persons within the United States.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce and implement 
this article by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 11, 2009 

d0831 

Order 

 

September 11, 2009 

137664-5(53) 

GHASSAN M. SAAB, 

Plaintiff/Counter-DefendantAppellee/Cross-Appellant, 

v SC: 137664-5 

 COA: 278384; 278772 

Genesee CC: 04-079096-CK 

ALICE FARAH, 

Defendant/Counter-PlaintiffAppellant/Cross-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 8, 2009 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

 CORRIGAN, J., would grant the motion for reconsideration. 

 MARKMAN, J., would grant the motion for reconsideration and, on reconsideration, 

would reverse for the reasons set forth in his dissenting statement in this case, 483 Mich 

1006 (2009).
The State of 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Thursday, April 9, 2015

No. 04-15-00187-CR

Dianna Wyrick Rodriguez aka Dianna Emmarose RING,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR6190

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain 

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea 

bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the 

prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately 

reflects that the criminal case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Rule 

25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a 

certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record 

under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal will be 

dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless appellant 

causes an amended trial court certification to be filed by May 7, 2015, showing appellant has the 

right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State,110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). 

All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the certification issue.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of April, 2015.
___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
CASE NO. 04-14-00130-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 

JOSHUA ORCASITAS,

Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appealed from the 175th Judicial District Court

of Bexar County, Texas

SUPPLEMENTAL CITATION OF AUTHORITIES

GROSS & ESPARZA, P.L.L.C.

MICHAEL C. GROSS

State Bar No. 08534480

106 South St. Mary’s Street, Suite 260

San Antonio, Texas 78205

Lawofcmg@gmail.com

(210) 354-1919

(210) 354-1920 Fax

Attorney for the Appellant,

JOSHUA ORCASITAS

ACCEPTED

04-14-00130-CR

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

4/9/2015 11:46:03 AM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 4/9/2015 11:46:03 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

JOSHUA ORCASITAS, the Appellant, submits the following supplemental

citation of authorities:

1. Bush v. State, No. 04-13-00466-CR (Tex. App. - San Antonio, January 29,

2014, no pet.) (Jury argument that is predicated upon, directly or indirectly,

matters outside record is improper and reversible if it injects or emphasizes

harmfulfacts outside record; an instruction to disregard will not cure such error

if “in light of the record as a whole it was extreme or manifestly improper,

violative of a mandatory statute, or injected new facts harmful to the accused.”)

2. McMurrough v. State, 995 S.W.2d 944 (Tex. App. - Fort Worth 1999, no pet.)

(Objection that prosecutor’s argument was outside record involves final

argument that was uninvited and unsbustantiated accusation of improper

conduct directed at defendant’s attorney as an outside record attack on defense

counsel’s integrity and was incurable by jury instruction and reversible.)

Respectfully submitted,

GROSS & ESPARZA, P.L.L.C.

/s/ Michael C. Gross 

Michael C. Gross

State Bar No. 08534480

106 South St. Mary’s Street, Suite 260

San Antonio, Texas 78205

Lawofcmg@gmail.com

(210) 354-1919

(210) 354-1920 Fax

Attorney for the Appellant,

JOSHUA ORCASITAS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was faxed to Laura Durbin,

Assistant District Attorney, 335-2436, on the 9th day of April 2015.

/s/ Michael C. Gross
Denied; Opinion Filed April 8, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-21-00063-CV

IN RE HON. KIM COOKS, JUDGE 255TH DISTRICT COURT, DALLAS 

COUNTY, TEXAS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF10-14998

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 Before Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle

Opinion by Justice Myers

Relator’s January 28, 2021 petition for writ of mandamus challenges the trial 

court’s order to unseal court records. To be entitled to mandamus relief, relator must 

demonstrate that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that she has no 

adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 

2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on our review of the petition, real party’s response,

and the record before us, we conclude that relator has failed to show her entitlement 

to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus, see 

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a), and we lift our January 28, 2021 stay order.
–2–

We are confident that the trial court will ensure that the parties strictly comply 

with Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 21(c). See TEX. R. CIV. P. 21(c) (requiring

sensitive data, such as a home address and minor’s name, to be redacted from filed 

documents).

210063F.P05

/Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.2

              Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
            Securities and Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Richard Cohen, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ABC Funding,
Inc.

      2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
and

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; and

            b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Dated: May 11, 2007                   By: /s/ Richard Cohen
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Richard Cohen, Chief Financial Officer
                                          ABC Funding, Inc.