alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
05/27/201 1 10:5 6 FAX 202493514 2 FA A+ DM S glOOI/00 2 

# f ^ U.S . DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIO N

FEDERA L AVIATION ADMINISTRATIO N OFHC E O F HEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C . MA Y ^ : • i m 

## HEARIN G DOCKE: '

I n th e Matter

of Empir e Fligh t Academ y FDMSNo.FAA-2011-029 0 '^ %3= ^ AGENCY' S AMENDED COMPLAIN T e n Th e Federa

l Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA) , b y counsel , hereb y amend s it s Complain t i n thi s matter

t o addth e followin g regulatoi y allegatio n (i n additio n t o thos e alread y included) : (d ) Sectio n 91.7(a) , whic h state s tha t n o perso n ma

y operate acivi l aircraf

t imles s i t i s i n a n airworthy condition
. Respectfully submitted , AlfredR . Johnson , Jr . Regiona l Counsel By : 

## ^UAI ^ Zachaiy/M.^erma n Attorne y Date : Ma y 12,201 105/27/201 1 10:5 7 FA X 202493514 2 FA A * DM S @l002/00 2

CERTIFICAT

E O F SERVICE I hereb y certif

y tha t th e foregoing Agency' s AmendedComplain t ha s bee n sen t thi s dat e b y jfirs t clas s mai l an dfacsimil e t o th e following : Gregor y S . Winton , Esq . Aviatio n La w Expert s , LLC On e Researc h Court , Suite 45 0 Rockville , M D 2085 0 Telefax : (301)294-252 5 Th e Honorabl e Ronni e A . Yode r Chie f Administrativ e La

w Judg e U.S . Departmen

t o f Hearings , M-20 , RoomE12-32 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Telefax : (202)366-753 6 i hereb y certif

y tha t th e foregoing Agency' s AmendedComplain t ha s been sen

t thi s dat e b y first clas s mai l t o th e following; : Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (Origina l an done copy ) 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Atm : Hearin g Docket

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit

e

Date : MA

Y 1 2 201 1 / 4 ^ Hook s Paralega l Specialis t Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Ofl&c e of Regiona l Counsel 1 Aviatio n Plaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 110 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 110

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2021, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2021 (division A of Public Law 116-159) is further 
amended by striking

              

 the date specified in section 106(3) and inserting ``December 21, 
2020''.
     This joint resolution may be cited as the ``Extension of 
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2021''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 20, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 110

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2021, and for 
                            other purposes.
```
Exhibit 15.9



3rd Floor, 44 Esplanade, St.

St. Helier, Jersey, JE49WG



CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON



Jan Coetzee, in connection with the Shell Company Report on Form 20-F
dated June 22, 2023 filed by Metals Acquisition Limited and any amendments or supplements and/or exhibits thereto (collectively,
the “Form 20-F”) disclosing the Technical Report Summary (as defined below), consents to:



| | ● | the public filing and use of the technical report summary titled “Technical Summary Report – CSA Copper Mine – New South Wales - Australia, effective as of April 18, 2023, by Behre Dolbear Australia Minerals Industry Consultants and other qualified persons,” (the “Technical Report Summary”), with an effective date of April 18, 2023, and that was prepared in accordance with Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, as an exhibit to and referenced in the Form 20-F;
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ● | the use of and references to his name, including his status as an expert or “qualified person” (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission), in connection with the Form 20-F and any such Technical Report Summary; and          
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | ● | the information derived, summarized, quoted or referenced from
the Technical Report Summary, or portions thereof, that was prepared by him, that he supervised the preparation of and/or that was reviewed
and approved by him, that is included or incorporated by reference in the Form 20-F.



Dated this June 22, 2023



|/s/ Jan Coetzee                                           | 
|--------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Jan Coetzee                                               | 
|Officer of Metals Acquisition Limited, a Qualified Person |
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Wise Metals Group LLC (the Company) for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kenneth Stastny, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 21, 2007



By:

/s/ Kenneth StastnyKenneth StastnyChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00741-CR

Buford Randle a/k/a Randle Buford

v.

The State of Texas

On appeal from the

148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 12-CR-2890-E

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 9, 2015.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Carina Sanchez Sanchez

, * From the 238 th District

Court of Ector County,

Trial Court No. CR41432

.

Vs. No. 11

- 14

- 00305

- CR * August 25 , 2016

The State of Texas

, * Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this

court ’ s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 12 (Thursday, January 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-920]



[[Page 2717]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER12-795-000]


 High Liner Foods Incorporated; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding 
High Liner Foods Incorporated's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is February 1, 2012.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9cdad9cedfd3f2f0f5f2f9cfe9ececf3eee8dcfaf9eeffb2fbf3ea"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="286e6d7a6b67464441464d7b5d5858475a5c684e4d5a4b064f475e">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: January 12, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-920 Filed 1-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit No. 32.2


CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of MasterBrand, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2022 (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.








/s/ Andrea H. SimonAndrea H. SimonExecutive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer





Dated: March 10, 2023





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MasterBrand, Inc. and will be retained by MasterBrand, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Pine Street Pediatric Associates, P. C., Respondent, and Peter De Agostini, Appellant.

—Yesawich Jr., J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Cobb, J.), entered August 1, 1990 in Ulster County, which, *inter alia,*granted petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR 7510 to confirm an arbitration award.

A written agreement between the parties limited respondent’s right to "practice pediatrics within a radius of fifteen (15) miles from the limits of the City of Kingston, New York, for a period of five (5) years from the last day of employment”. *805It further provided that all disputes with respect to any term or provision of the agreement would be referred to arbitration. After respondent’s employment with petitioner, a professional pediatrics corporation, terminated, he asserted his intention to violate the restrictive covenant. Accordingly, petitioner submitted an arbitration demand to the American Arbitration Association.

After a hearing, the arbitrator upheld the validity of the covenant with certain limitations not relevant to this appeal. Petitioner, claiming the parties intended the arbitrator’s decision to be binding and nonappealable, sought confirmation of the decision and award; respondent petitioned to have the award vacated on the ground that the arbitrator exceeded his powers *(see,*CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [iii]). Supreme Court confirmed the award, prompting respondent to appeal.

Respondent contends that the arbitration award should be vacated because restrictive covenants which place unreasonable burdens on employment violate New York public policy. Irrespective of whether respondent’s express written waiver of his right to appeal the arbitrator’s award precludes him from petitioning *(see, Matter of Miller v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.,*126 AD2d 831, *affd*69 NY2d 970; *Matter of Security & Law Enforcement Employees v Hartnett,*119 AD2d 877, 878), the award is not judicially reviewable. An arbitrator’s determination enforcing a restrictive employment covenant, submitted to arbitration by mutual consent of the parties, is not subject to vacatur on public policy grounds unless the covenant is for an unreasonable period of time or unrelated to business concerns, neither of which obtains here *(see, Matter of Sprinzen [Nomberg],*46 NY2d 623, 631).

Weiss, J. P., Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 45 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2019, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2019 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. JORDAN, Mr. DAVIDSON of Ohio, 

Mr. PERRY, Mr. HICE of Georgia, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. ROY, Mr. GOSAR, 

and Mr. GREEN of Tennessee) submitted the following joint resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 

2019, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2019 (division 

4 C of Public Law 115–245) is further amended by striking 

5 the date specified in section 105(3) and inserting ‘‘Feb6 ruary 22, 2019’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6533

BENJAMIN BANNISTER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLIAM D. CATOE, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES CONDON, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenwood. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-99-1504-9-24RB) Submitted: August 17, 2001 Decided: September 10, 2001 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benjamin Bannister, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Benjamin Bannister seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Bannister’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on September 29, 2000. According Bannister the benefit of Fed. R. App. P. 4(c), his notice of appeal was filed on March 28, 2001. Although Bannister claimed he did not receive the district court’s order until March 9, 2001, he did not move for an extension of time to appeal within seven days of his receipt of the district court’s order. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6)(A). Because Bannister failed tofile a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the3facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00337

- CR
Edgar Garces Diaz v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. CR

- 4247

- 09

- D

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this c ause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 19, 2015
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-41628

Conference Calendar

 

ANTHONY LEON SUMMERS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CHUCK BISCOE, Warden; BURNS, Warden; MIDER, Captain;

STRUNK, Doctor; MAGRAM, Major,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-03-CV-493

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Anthony Leon Summers, Texas prisoner # 1130913, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for

want of prosecution due to his failure to timely comply with the

court’s initial partial filing fee order. For the first time on

appeal, Summers alleges that he attempted to comply with the

district court’s order but was unable to do so because prison

officials did not timely respond to his request for assistance.
No. 03-41628

-2-

This court will not consider factual allegations raised for

the first time on appeal. See Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d 320,

321 (5th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED. 

All outstanding motions are DENIED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00464

- CV

Mark DAVIS

, Appellant

v.

MIDDLE BOSQUE PARTNERS, LP and Highland Coryell Ranch, LLC, Appellees

From the 13th Judicial District Court, Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court No. D12

- 21464

- CV Honorable James E. Lagomarsino, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is REVERSED, and the cause is REMANDED fo r further proceedings. It is ORDERED that appellant, Mark Davis, recover his costs of this appeal from appellees, Middle Bosque Partners, LP and Highland Coryell Ranch, LLC.

SIGNED April 9, 2014.

_____________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1064 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to allow whistleblowers 

to disclose information to certain recipients. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1064 EH

1 SECTION 1. RECIPIENTS OF WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLO2 SURES. 

3 Section 2302(b)(8)(B) of title 5, United States Code, 

4 is amended by striking ‘‘or to the Inspector’’ and all that 

5 follows through ‘‘such disclosures’’ and inserting ‘‘the In6 spector General of an agency, a supervisor in the employ7 ee’s direct chain of command up to and including the head 

8 of the employing agency, or to an employee designated by 

9 any of the aforementioned individuals for the purpose of 

10 receiving such disclosures’’. 

11 SEC. 2. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

12 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

13 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

14 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

15 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

16 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

17 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro18 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

19 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 11, 

2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1064 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to allow 

recipients. whistleblowers to disclose information to certain
**Exhibit 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, R. Clay Hulette, the Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ R. Clay Hulette

 

 

R. Clay Hulette

 

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

November 14, 2005