alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Serge Atlan, certify that: 

  1) I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-QSB/A of INverso Corp.;  

  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;  

  3) Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;  

  4) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  

  a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based upon such evaluation; and  

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and  

  5) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):  

  a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information and 

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: February 14, 2006

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan 

    Serge Atlan

    Chairman
Exhibit 10.2


 


ALERISLIFE INC.


 


Summary of Director Compensation


 


The following is a summary of the currently effective compensation
of the Directors of AlerisLife Inc. (the “Company”) for services as Directors, which is subject to modification at any time
by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) or the Compensation Committee of the Board, as applicable:


 


	 	·	Each Independent Director receives an annual fee of $75,000 for services as a Director. The annual fee for any new Independent Director is prorated for the initial year.


 


	 	·	Each Independent Director who serves as a committee chair of the Board’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee or Nominating and Governance Committee receives an additional annual fee of $25,000, $15,000 and $15,000, respectively. The committee chair fee for any new committee chair is prorated for the initial year.


 


	 	·	The Lead Independent Director receives an additional annual cash retainer fee of $20,000 for serving in this role.


 


	 	·	Each Director receives a grant of 12,500 shares of the Company’s common stock on the date of the first Board meeting following each annual meeting of stockholders (or, for Directors who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first Board meeting attended).


 


	 	·	The Company generally reimburses all Directors for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Directors and for out of pocket costs incurred in connection with their attending certain continuing education programs.
FEE TABLE – UNITED STATES WAREHOUSE ACT (Effective 10/1/2019) 

EXPORT FOOD 

AID 

COMMODITIES

License 

Action Fee Inspection Fee 

Annual User Fees 

Annual Fee Locations 

$110 

$1,100 for 1 to 3 

locations 

$330 for each 

location over 3 

$1,650 for 

$330 for each 

1 to 3 

location over 3
April 9, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ANDRE NIGEL BENNETT, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00474-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcripts of the record of the court below, and 

having inspected the record, the Court holds there was no error in the judgment 

requiring reversal, but there was error in the judgment as entered, which is capable 

of reformation by this Court. Therefore, the judgment is REFORMED, to reflect 

appellant was convicted of theft in an amount greater than $1,500 but less than 

$20,000.

The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED as REFORMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EX-4.2





 Exhibit 4.2 

Incorporated in the Cayman Islands 

Intchains Group Limited 
 This is to
certify that 
 is / are the registered shareholders of: 
  

									
	No. of Shares	  	Type of Share	 	  	Par Value	 
		  				  			
		  	 	Class A Ordinary	 	  	 	USD 0.0001	 
	 Date of Record
	  	 	Certificate Number	 	  	 	% Paid	 
		  				  	 	100.00	 

 The above shares are subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company and transferable in
accordance therewith. 
  

									
	  
	 	Director	 		 	  
	  	Director / Secretary
User Fee Obligations by Program for FY20

FY 2020

Grain Insp. & 

Weigh. 

Grain I&W 

$/MT 

Grain Official 

Agencies Supv 

Grain OA 

Supv $/MT Rice Commodities 

5 Year Rolling Average (FY15-19) 122,738,781

Actual Metric Tons FY 2020 110,090,771 237,649,430

Salary and Benefits $ 28,926,157 0.263 $ 1,099,018 0.005 $4,350,639 $1,951,498

Travel $ 477,516 0.004 $ 27,264 0.000 $85,235 $48,959

Shipping and Moving Expenses $ 69,526 0.001 $ 8,887 0.000 $4,554 $645

Rent and Utilities $ 1,150,162 0.010 $ 16,547 0.000 $182,467 $180,673

Printing $ 35,946 0.000 $ 2,027 0.000 $7,894 $1,217

1 Other Services $ 4,204,291 0.038 $ 650,034 0.003 $1,039,814 $246,939

Supplies and Materials $ 427,667 0.004 $ 3,856 0.000 $19,981 $57,383

Equipment $ 486,596 0.004 $ 0 0.000 $25,899 $60,901

Grants, Subsidies, and Contributions $ 0 0.000 $ 0 0.000 $2,200 $0

Insurance Claims $ 19,450 0.000 $ 0 0.000 $0 $0 

Interest Paid $ 280 0.000 $ 1 0.000 $3 $0

TOTAL $ 35,797,593 $ 0.325 $ 1,807,633 $ 0.008 $ 5,718,686 $ 2,548,214

1Other Services includes AMS overhead costs, Agency and Mission Area-level administrative support costs (e.g., Information 

Technology and Human Resource Support), as well as costs for FGIS contracts and training. 

Dated: 12/14/2020
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



The undersigned,

Date:  January 19, 2007.

| | /s/ "Harpreet S. Sangha"___________________________________                                                        
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Harpreet S. Sangha
President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer and a director                  
| | /s/ "Antonia Bold-de-Haughton"___________________________________                                                  
| | Antonia Bold-de-Haughton
Secretary, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and a director

__________
*Of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit,

sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 03-2032

ANGEL YUANES RIVERA-MARTINEZ,

Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

JOHN D. ASHCROFT, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Torruella, Circuit Judge,

Rosenn,* Senior Circuit Judge,

and Howard, Circuit Judge.

Emanuel Howard for petitioner-appellant.

Barry J. Pettinato, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of

Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, with

whom Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division,

and David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, were on brief, for

respondent-appellee.

November 4, 2004
# FY21 Vendor Table

Page &P
## **Exhibit31.2**

**Section 302 Certification**

I, Patrick M. Fox,certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofSeneca Gaming Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.    The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Discussed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: August 14, 2007 | /s/ Patrick M. Fox            |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------|
|                  | Patrick M. Fox                |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer       |
|                  | (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 23 ,

2024
.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 24

- 00003

- CV

WENXIN XIA , Appellant

V. GARTH ROLLBROOK, LLC AND RAYMOND FLOYD , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 165th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018

- 68652

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 9, 2023. On March 22, 2024 , appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1 (a)(1) . The motion is granted. We dismiss the appeal

. PER CURIAM
Panel c onsists of Justice s Wise, Spain, and Hassan.
You are here: EPA Home Pesticides Regulating Pesticides Registration Review



### A periodic look at pesticides
The Food Quality Pr otection Act mandated a new program: registration review . All pesticides distributed and sold in the United States must be registered by EPA, based on scientific data showing that they will not cause unreason able risks to human health, workers, or the environment when used as directed on product labeling. The new registration review program makes sure that, as the ability to assess risk ev olves and as policies and practices change, all registered pesticides continue to meet the statutory standard of no unreasonable adverse effects.
Changes in science, public policy, and pesticid e use practices will occur over time. Through the new registration review program, the Agency periodically reevaluate s pesticides to make sure that as change occurs, products in th e marketplace can still be used safely. The registration review program challenges EPA to continuously improve its processes, science, and information management while maintain ing a collaborative and open process for decision-making. Quick Resources Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) - Tier 1 Battery, Test Guidelines, and Schedule - October 16
, 2009 

## Pesticides: Registration Review htt p : // www.e p a. g ov / o pp srrd1 / re g istration

_ review / Last u p dated on Monda y, December 28
, 2009 

### Page 1 of 1 Registration Review | Pesticides | US EPA

5/24/2010 htt p ://www.e p a. g ov/o pp srrd1/re g istration

_ review /
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 13 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 13

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
               clarify the presidential pardoning power.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

Mr. Green of Texas submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
               clarify the presidential pardoning power.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``The President shall have no power to grant to himself a reprieve 
or pardon for an offense against the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
Pennsylvania

Department

of Environmental

ProtectionRachelCarsonStateOfficeBuildingP.O.Box2063Harrisburg,PA17105-2063October20,2010Secretary717-787-2814Mr.ShaM.GarvinRegionalAdministratorU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,RegionIII1650ArchStreet(MailCode:3RAOO)Philadelphia,PA19103-2029DearMr.Garvin:EnclosedforyourapprovalisarevisiontoPennsylvania’sStateImplementationPlan(SIP)concerningamendmentsto25Pa.CodeChapters121and123(relatingtogeneralprovisions;andstandardsforcontaminants).Thesubmittalincludestwohardcopiesandonecompactdiskofafinal-formrulemakingthataddsprovisionsunder

§123.14forthecontrolofemissionsofparticulatematter(PM)fromtheoperationofoutdoorwood-firedboilers.Thefinal-formrulemakingalsoaddssixnewtermsanddefinitionsunder

§121.1(relatingtodefinitions).ThisSIPrevisionsubmissionincludesthefinal-formrulemakingnoticepublishedinthePennsylvaniaBulletinonOctober2,2010(40Pa.B.5571-5578),documentationofthepublicparticipationprocessincludingproofofpublicnotice,andtheDepartmentofEnvironmentalProtection’spubliccommentandresponsedocument.ShouldyouhaveanyquestionsregardingthisSIPrevision,pleasecontactJoyceE.Epps,Director,BureauofAirQuality,bye-mailatjeepps@state.pa.usorbytelephoneat717-787-9702.Sincerely,JohnHangerSecretary

RECEiVEDEnclosures

2SDW’IS’onç.pPOO)AnEqualOpportunityEmployerwww.dep.state.pa.usPrintedonRecycledPaper
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 94 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 94

 Providing for congressional disapproval of the rule submitted by the 
   Internal Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury, relating to 
    ``Relief with Respect to Employment Tax Deadlines Applicable to 
 Employers Affected by the Ongoing Coronavirus (COVID-19) Disease 2019 
                              Pandemic''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 4, 2020

   Mr. Larson of Connecticut (for himself, Mr. Neal, Mr. Thompson of 
   California, Mr. Suozzi, Mr. Beyer, Ms. Moore, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. 
 Panetta, Mr. Horsford, Ms. Sanchez, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. Higgins of New 
   York, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Evans, Mr. Kildee, Ms. 
 DelBene, Mr. Kind, Mr. Courtney, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Himes, Mrs. Hayes, 
 and Ms. Sewell of Alabama) submitted the following joint resolution; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for congressional disapproval of the rule submitted by the 
   Internal Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury, relating to 
    ``Relief with Respect to Employment Tax Deadlines Applicable to 
 Employers Affected by the Ongoing Coronavirus (COVID-19) Disease 2019 
                              Pandemic''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by 
the Internal Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury, relating to 
``Relief with Respect to Employment Tax Deadlines Applicable to 
Employers Affected by the Ongoing Coronavirus (COVID-19) Disease 2019 
Pandemic'' (Internal Revenue Service Notice 2020-65), and such rule 
shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
ex_384353.htm


Exhibit 4.19


 


 





 


 


July 28, 2021


 


Elizabeth Williams


2 Bloor St. W, 7th Floor


Toronto, ON    M4W 3E2


 


 


Dear Elizabeth,


 


We are asking you to agree to certain changes to the written employment agreement dated December 12, 2016 as amended September 21, 2017 and November 3, 2021 (your "Employment Agreement") a copy of which is enclosed with this amendment letter).


 


We have set out the change that will be made to the terms of your Employment Agreement, below. Please sign and return this document to indicate your acceptance of this change. Once you have accepted the change, this document will constitute an official amendment to the terms of your Employment Agreement.


 


	 	
			1.

				
			Change to your Base Salary - Section 3.1(a) will be modified to reflect your new Base Salary of Cdn $285,000 which is effective as of April 1, 2021.

			
	 	 	 
	 	Finally, all other terms and conditions of your Employment Agreement shall remain the same.



 


Thank you for taking the time to carefully consider this letter. Please return a signed copy at your earliest convenience. In the meantime, if you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.


 


Yours Sincerely,


Medicenna Therapeutics


 


Signed: /s/ Fahar Merchant                        


 


I hereby agree to amend the terms and conditions of my Employment Agreement, as described above. All remaining terms and conditions of my employment will remain in effect, unchanged by this consent.


 


	
			Signed: /s/ Elizabeth Williams                  


			             Elizabeth Williams

				
			Date:   July 28, 2021
United States Court of Appeals 

For the First Circuit 

No. 14-1047 

ÁNGELA RIVERA-CARRASQUILLO; JOSÉ HERNÁNDEZ-QUIÑONES; CONJUGAL 

PARTNERSHIP HERNÁNDEZ-RIVERA, 

Plaintiffs, Appellees, 

v. 

CENTRO ECUESTRE MADRIGAL, INC., d/b/a Hacienda Madrigal; 

INTEGRAND ASSURANCE COMPANY; PASIÓN ECUESTRE, INC.; GERARDO 

CALDERÓN-LOZANO, 

Defendants, Appellants, 

FLORENCIO BERRÍOS-CASTRODAD; IRMA SARA CASILLAS; AGRO 

MONTELLANO, INC., CRIADERO LA GLORIA, INC.; EDGARDO VÉLEZ; 

RESTAURANTE EL ESTRIBO; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP BERRÍOS-CASILLAS, 

Defendants. 

ERRATA SHEET 

The opinion of this Court issued on January 25, 2016 is 

amended as follows: 

On page 5, line 24, replace "Id. at 27" with "Id." 

On page 15, line 8, replace "Defendants" with "[d]efendants". 

On page 15, line 12, insert the word "the" between "in" and 

"Report". 

On page 16, footnote 13, line 4, replace "supra" with "supra". 

On page 32, footnote 23, line 2, replace "judgement" with 

"judgment".
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 20, 2021

s0113

Order 

Clerk

January 20, 2021

160827

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 160827

COA: 349268

Mecosta CC: 08-006437-FC

JONATHAN JOSEPH GOOD, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of July 31, 2020, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the 

application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals. On 

order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is 

again considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we 

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration, as on leave granted, of (1) 

whether the defendant, by filing a Standard 4 supplemental brief on direct appeal, waived 

his right to claim ineffective assistance of appellate counsel in proceedings under MCR 

Subchapter 6.500; (2) whether the Court of Appeals decided the defendant’s restitution 

and sentencing grounds for relief against him in the prior appeal, MCR 6.508(D)(2); and 

(3) if not, whether the defendant is entitled to relief from judgment on these grounds for 

relief. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

On remand, while retaining jurisdiction, the Court of Appeals shall remand this 

case to the Mecosta Circuit Court and direct that court to appoint counsel to represent the 

defendant in the Court of Appeals. Because the State Appellate Defender Office and 

Laurel Kelly Young represented the defendant in prior appellate proceedings, neither may 

be appointed as appellate counsel. 

We do not retain jurisdiction.