alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
______________________________________________

Relationship Between Marbling, Maturity, and Carcass Quality Grade*

Maturity** 

Degrees of 

Marbling A*** B C D E

* Assumes that firmness of lean is comparably developed with the degree of marbling and that the carcass 

is not a “dark cutter.”

** Maturity increases from left to right (A through E).

*** The A maturity portion of the Figure is the only portion applicable to bullock carcasses.

Figure 1
H. Con. Res. 21 Agreed to February 27, 2019

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill S. 47, the Secretary of 

the Senate shall make the following corrections: 

(1) Strike subsection (a) of section 1 and insert the following: ‘‘(a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘John 

D. Dingell, Jr. Conservation, Management, and Recreation 

Act’.’’. 

(2) Strike the header of section 9003 and insert ‘‘JOHN

S. MCCAIN III 21ST CENTURY CONSERVATION SERVICE CORPS

ACT’’ (and conform the table of sections accordingly). 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
## R e q u e s t f

o r I n f o r m a t i o n

­ L a n d A i r B e y o n d P h o t o g r a p h y ( F A A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 1 6 6 0 )

9

­ A W A

­ A V S

­ 3 3 3 E x e m p t i o n s ( F A

A )

S e n t : T h u r s d a y

, J u l y 1 6

, 2 0 1 5 1 1 : 4 4 A M

T o : g r e e n

. 7 7 0 @ c o m c a s t

. n e t

D e a r M r

. G r e e n :

T h i s l e t t e r i s t o i n f o r m y o u t h a t t h e f

o l l o w i n g i n f

o r m a t i o n i s m i s s i n g f r o m y

o u r p e t i t i o n ( D o c k

e t N o

. F A A

− 2 0 1 5

− 1 6 6 0 )

. T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n i s n e c e s s a r y f

o r t h e F e d e r a l A v i a t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( F A A ) t o p r o c e s s y o u r p e t i t i o n

.

P r o v i d e a c o p y o f t h e M o t i o n P i c t u r e a n d T e l e v i s i o n O p e r a t i o n s M a n u a l ( M P T O M ) w h i c h i s r e q u i r e d b y O r d e r

8 9 0 0

. 1

, V o l u m e 3

, C h a p t e r 8

, S e c t i o n 1

. I f y o u w i s h f o r u s t o p r o c e e d w i t h o u t t h i s m a n u a l a n d r e m o v e

c l o s e d

‐ s e t f i l m i n g f r o m y

o u r p r o p o s e d o p e r a t i o n p l e a s e i n f o r m o f u s o f y

o u r i n t e n t i o n b y t h e r e q u e s t e d

r e s p o n s e d a t e l i s t e d b e l o w

.

P l e a s e s u b m i t t h e a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n ( n o n

‐ p r o p r i e t a r y ) t o y o u r d o c k e t a t w w w

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g o v a n d s u b m i t a n y

p r o p r i e t a r y i n f

o r m a t i o n t o t h e F A A H e a d q u a r t e r s o r e l e c t r o n i c a l l y v i a e m a i l t o 3 3 3 e x e m p t i o n s @ f a a

. g o v

. I f y

o u w a n t

u s t o p r o c e s s y

o u r r e q u e s t a n y f u r t h e r

, w e m u s t r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n d e s c r i b e d a b o v

e b y 7 / 3 0 / 2 0 1 5

. I f w e d o n o t

r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n

, w e w i l l c l o s e t h e d o c k e t w i t h o u t n o t i f

y i n g y o u f u r t h e r

.

T h a n k y o u f o r y o u r i n t e r e s t i n a v i a t i o n s a f

e t y

. F A A O f f i c e o f R u l e m a k i n g
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**




**PURSUANT
      TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**









I,
      Peter
      C. Mann, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Amendment No. 1 to
      the
      quarterly report of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the period
      ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable, and that
      information contained in such quarterly report fairly presents in all material
      respects the financial condition and results of operations of Prestige Brands
      Holdings, Inc.




**/s/
                P****eter****C. M****ann**Name:Peter
                C. MannTitle:Chairman
                and Chief Executive OfficerDate:January
                12, 2006
Exhibit 31-2   CERTIFICATION  I, Warren Delano, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of Lexington Precision Corporation;   2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;   3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;   4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and have:   (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:   (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  April 23, 2009 /s/ Warren Delano Warren Delano President and Director (Co-Principal Executive Officer)
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 8, 2015.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D13-2336

Lower Tribunal Nos. 08-21731, 08-22479, 08-22491, 08-24743,

08-29745, 08-33667

________________

Calvin Watkins,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Stacy D. Glick,

Judge.

Aubrey Q. Webb, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Mary-Grace Mendoza, Assistant

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SHEPHERD, C.J., and LAGOA and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Calvin Watkins v. State

Case No. 3D13-2336

SHEPHERD, C.J., concurring specially.

I concur in affirming the trial court’s revocation of Watkins’ probation and

the sentences imposed. However, because the trial court failed to enter a written

order of revocation, I would remand for entry of an order setting forth the reasons

for revoking probation, in accordance with the trial court’s oral pronouncements. 

See Thomas v. State, No. 3D13-1794 (Fla. 3d DCA March 11, 2015); Brown v.

State, 127 So. 3d 831 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).

2
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 8 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States limiting 

the pardon power of the President. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. COHEN (for himself, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Ms. JAYAPAL, Mr. JOHNSON

of Georgia, Mr. TED LIEU of California, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. 

BEYER, and Mr. ESPAILLAT) submitted the following joint resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States limiting the pardon power of the President. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 8 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘The President shall not have the power to grant par3 dons and reprieves to himself or herself, to the President’s 

4 brother, sister, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, spouse, par5 ent, child, or grandchild or to the spouse of the President’s 

6 grandchild, to the President’s aunt, uncle, nephew or niece 

7 or to the spouse of the President’s nephew or niece, or 

8 to the President’s first or second cousin, the spouse of the 

9 President’s first or second cousin, the President’s mother10 in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, or daughter-in-law, or to 

11 any current or former member of the President’s adminis12 tration, or to anyone who worked on the President’s presi13 dential campaign as a paid employee.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
c

3 / Meurc/L *X&l<r

ttb-eJ /Jc./7$+*s £(**k

ft£i YD-ttU-M.

D-€CLr~ Lit'- k- >

-J - . - .. „ &—* -

denlgjL, / kcjyik yocA tor you*- 6^r:<:ia^rc^

t'n j~ki<? mgihSLT^

^"1C&s-e.lL

COUR'I" OFCftiMlhSALAPPEAU Kob&rT Jes^pk U^ygcLy- apr Q^tmr

Abs»Aooste,Cteik jpNA'rA0/J h

P&rT/vit,, 7e >c*t e 76 5II

Appellant) P^o $e~
Exhibit 15.2







Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Psyence Biomedical Ltd. Shell Company Report on Form 20-F of our auditor’s report dated July 28, 2023 relating
to the carve-out consolidated financial statements of Psyence Biomed Corp. consisting of the carve-out consolidated statements of financial
position as at March 31, 2023, March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021 and the related carve-out consolidated statements of net loss and comprehensive
loss, changes in net parent investment, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended March 31, 2023, as included
in the Registration Statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-273553), as filed with the United States Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”).



We also consent to the reference
to our firm under the headings “Auditors” and “Statement by Experts” in the Form 20-F.







Chartered Professional Accountants

Licensed
Public Accountants



Toronto, Canada

January 31, 2024
NO. 07-12-00140-CR 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AT AMARILLO 

PANEL A 

MAY 22, 2012 

LUCAS BERMEA CONSTANCIO, APPELLANT 

v. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

FROM THE 242ND DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY; 

NO. B-18420-1005; HONORABLE EDWARD LEE SELF, JUDGE 

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

On November 1, 2010, appellant, Lucas Bermea Constancio, was convicted of 

the offense of driving while intoxicated, and sentenced to incarceration in the Texas 

Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, for a period of fifteen years. On 

April 12, 2012, appellant filed his notice of appeal with the trial court. We dismiss for 

want of jurisdiction. 

To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is 

imposed or suspended in open court or within ninety days after that date if a motion for 

new trial is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). Therefore, appellant’s notice of appeal 
2 

was due on December 1, 2010. Because appellant’s notice of appeal was filed 499 

days after it was due, this Court is without jurisdiction over this appeal. See Olivo v. 

State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). Because this Court is without 

jurisdiction to address the merits of this appeal, we have no authority to take any action 

other than to dismiss the appeal. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 

(Tex.Crim.App. 1998); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 523. 

By letter dated April 18, 2012, this Court notified appellant that it appeared that 

his notice of appeal was untimely filed and failed to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction, and 

directed him to file a response with the Court, by May 18, explaining how this Court has 

jurisdiction over the appeal.1

 In response, appellant filed a document entitled “Grounds 

for Notice of Appeal,” which evinces that appellant’s response intends to challenge the 

merits of his conviction rather than address this Court’s jurisdiction over this appeal. 

As such, we now dismiss the purported appeal for want of jurisdiction.2

 Mackey K. Hancock 

 Justice 

Do not publish. 

 1

 This correspondence further notified appellant that the trial court’s certification 

of defendant’s right of appeal indicates that this case is a plea-bargained case and 

appellant has no right of appeal. We notified appellant that the appeal is subject to 

dismissal based on this certification unless the Court receives an amended certification 

providing that appellant has the right of appeal or other grounds for continuing the 

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2. We have received no amended certification of 

defendant’s right of appeal. 

2

 Appellant may have recourse by filing a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus 

returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration of an out-of-time 

appeal. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2007).
#### PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Complainant, v. Donald N. PACHECO, Attorney-Respondent.

No. 79SA408.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Jan. 21, 1980.

*335Linda Donnelly, Robert B. Kane, Denver, for complainant.

Kenneth N. Kripke, Denver, for attorney-respondent.

ERICKSON, Justice.

This is a disciplinary proceeding against the respondent, Donald N. Pacheco. Although the respondent undertook to represent Gilbert Hernandez and his wife, Deh-lia Hernandez, and accepted a fee from his clients, the respondent disregarded his obligation to perform the legal services for which he was retained. Without going into extensive detail, the record shows that the respondent failed to protect his client’s rights, and caused them inconvenience and a substantial financial loss. Moreover, he was less than candid with the court when questioned about settlement of one of the Hernandez’ cases. No good purpose would be served by a further reiteration of the facts which were brought before the Grievance Committee.

In this case the Grievance Committee has recommended suspension for six months for failure of the respondent to carry out the duties he owed to his clients. *See People v. James,*176 Colo. 299, 490 P.2d 291 (1971). However, while this case was being processed by the Grievance Committee, the respondent signed a stipulation, with the advice of counsel, which this Court approved. The stipulation agreed to an eight-year suspension following the respondent’s surrender of his license to practice law, and is equivalent to disbarment. *People v. Pacheco,*Colo., 608 P.2d 333 (1979). In view of our previous action in accepting the surrender of respondent’s license for eight years, a six-month suspension would be meaningless, unless it was made to run consecutively.1

Accordingly, the respondent is suspended and may not reapply for readmission until eight years and six months after October 22,1979. The respondent shall not be readmitted unless he can show by clear and convincing evidence that he has complied with all applicable discipline or disability orders, and shows, by such procedures as then may be required, that he possesses the requisite fitness and competence to practice law.

1

. Our records reflect that additional grievance proceedings against the respondent resulted in four letters of admonition being issued between December 4, 1973 and May 3, 1979. Two of the letters of admonition advise the respondent of his violation of DR6-101(A)(3) and DR7-101(A)(3) for neglect in handling legal matters entrusted to him. Another letter pointed out the respondent’s breach of DR2-110(A)(3) for withdrawal as counsel coupled with the subsequent failure to refund an unearned fee.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: E.S.D.

PETITION OF: E.S.D.

:

:

:

:

:

No. 580 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED and the Application to File Under Seal and Edit Caption is GRANTED.
Exhibit
10.32


 


AMENDMENT
7.5% PROMISSORY NOTE


DATED
DECEMBER 1, 2020


 


WHEREAS,
on December 1, 2020, Shuttle Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Obligor”), issued a $138,448.20
unsecured promissory note (the “Note”), in favor of Anatoly Dritschilo (the “Payee”), bearing interest
at the rate of 7.5% per annum; the Note was originally due December 31, 2021 (the “Maturity Date”); and


 


WHEREAS,
the Obligor and the Payee wish to amend the terms of the Note to extend the Maturity Date by six months to June 30, 2022 (the “New
Maturity Date”), to provide additional time for the Company to repay the Note and for the accrual of interest on the principal
amount of the Note during such extension.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration the sufficiency
of which is hereby acknowledged, the Obligor and the Payee hereby agree that the unpaid principal balance of the Note shall be due and
payable on the New Maturity Date, along with any accrued interest through that date. All other terms and conditions of the Note shall
remain unchanged.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed by the Obligor and acknowledged by the Payee as of the 25th day
of January 2022.


 


	 	SHUTTLE
    PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Anatoly Dritschilo          
	 	Name:	Anatoly
    Dritschilo
	 	Title:	Chief
    Executive Officer


 


	Acknowledged
    and Agreed:	 
	 	 
	/s/
    Anatoly Dritschilo	 
	Anatoly
    Dritschilo
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of City Capital Corporation (“City Capital”). Questions have also arisen regarding the accuracy and adequacy of publicly available information about City Capital because it has not filed any periodic reports since its delinquent 2009 Form 10-K, filed June 15, 2010.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company.

*Therefore, it is ordered,*                     pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on April 13, 2012 and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 26, 2012.                

By the Commission.

Jill M. Peterson,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-9302 Filed 4-13-12; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
2625 Oxford Road

Chatham, VA 24531

P: (434) 927.4447

F: (434) 927.5291

October 27, 2022

Via electronic mail to: Dana.coale@usda.gov

Ms. Dana Coale, Deputy Administrator 

Agricultural Marketing Service 

United States Department of Agriculture 

USDA-AMS-1400 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, D.C. 20250-0225

Re: Request for a hearing to amend Federal Milk Marketing Orders 5, 6, and 7

Dear Ms. Coale,

This letter confirms the support of Cobblestone Milk Cooperative for a hearing to amend the 

southeastern US federal milk orders as requested by DCMA in the request letter from Attorney 

Marvin Beshore. This further confirms our support for the five proposals submitted with the 

hearing request. We respectfully request that a hearing be held on an emergency basis to 

expedite the relief requested to our orders.

Thank you,

Bennett Fulper, CEO
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308,CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

AjsesPQs^

OFFICIAL BUSINESS

STATE OF TEXAS'/*'•'

3/25/2015 PRIVATE USE-*, „ |S&ooo655?458 mar26 2015

JOHNSON, KENNETH RAY Tr.Ct.'tiollStfmF* MA'^DFR0M W^S^OS

This is to advise that the Court has" denied without written order on the findings of

the trial court after hearing the application fof.writ of habeas corpus.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

PRESIDING JUDGE 20TH DISTRICT COURT

P O BOX 728

CAMERON, TX 76520 utf

3A'v'RS3B 7652D *1m'11M f,%11 hMll1*MKh 111m *M"* ** I*' *1'1l' 11 Tm I•I'll,m 1**1
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

0FF8COAL BUS8MESS * ~H&Zi?m&i2£ <f ^

STATE OF TEXAS- ytiJS-fflSgB fGTHaS^S*"

PENALTY FOR, i: ' R4^S ° ~TM«"XT^« private iiqg ' ^^ESlSsH 021M $©Q).26S 3/17/2015 PRIVATE USE *«.- <$$ ^pjs^|g$g 0004279596 mar20 2015

RIVERA, DOUGLAS WILMER^Tr. dlftoT1%M3^MA,^DFROMWR^8¥;9T69C04

On this day, this Court has granted the tria[_court's requestfor an extension oftime

pursuantto T.R.A.P. 73.5. The clerks record,,containing the 11.07writ application

is due in this Court on Tuesday, May 5, 20*15.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

DOUGLAS WILMER RIVERA

JEFFERSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY - \

TDC# 1760730 j

P. O. BOX 26007 •/•• 1

BEAUMONT, TX 77720 i

BAWBS3S 77-720 •••*|«|»*** »|*1««| 11 ••11^ 1111 *11 liI'IP*I•''*lvl11 ^' llHS1%1ll•t*