alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 12 (Thursday, January 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-952]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Initial Review Group; Neurological Sciences and Disorders 
B.
    Date: February 23, 2012.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hotel Monaco Alexandria, 480 King Street, Alexandria, VA 
22314.
    Contact Person: Birgit Neuhuber, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, 
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, NSC, 
6001 Executive Blvd., Room 3202, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 
(301) 496-3562 <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1b757e6e736e797e695b7572757f6835757273357c746d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c62697964796e697e4c626562687f22626564226b637a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS.)


    Dated: January 12, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-952 Filed 1-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          1,716
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,491
<INVENTORY>                                     9,086
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               26,211
<PP&E>                                         36,219
<DEPRECIATION>                                 11,346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 99,331
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          18,849
<BONDS>                                        18,343
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       16,723
<OTHER-SE>                                     15,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        0
<SALES>                                        79,771
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              104,787
<CGS>                                          52,434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  86,440
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   18
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              5,123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                13,206
<INCOME-TAX>                                    5,730
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             7,476
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   614
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    6,862
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0





</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 52 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 52

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine 
                               justices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 21, 2019

Mr. Green of Tennessee submitted the following joint resolution; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine 
                               justices.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein),
    That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the 
Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents 
and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the 
legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years 
after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The Supreme Court of the United States shall be 
composed of nine justices, though one or more of these nine offices may 
be vacant until filled.
    ``Section 2. If the size of the Supreme Court has been increased to 
more than nine justices before this amendment is ratified, upon the 
ratification of this amendment, those additional offices are void.
    ``Section 3. Congress shall have the power to enforce this article 
by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1150. THOMPSON v. BANK OF AMERICA.

Appellant’s brief and enumerations of error were due to be filed on March 12,

2015. This Court granted Appellant’s “Motion to Extend Time for Filing Appellant’s

Brief,” giving Appellant until March 20, 2015, to file. That date has passed, and

Appellant’s brief and enumerations of error have not been filed. Accordingly, this

appeal is DISMISSED pursuant to Court of Appeals Rules 13, 15 (a), and 23 (a).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/30/2015

March 30, 2015
CCC-TEFAP Mul�ple Products PCA, 12-3J14-24-B-0252-0001 (WBSCM Number 2000009904).

The USDA/Agricultural Marke�ng Service/Commodity Procurement Program (CPP) hereby announces the award of 

Solicita�on 12-3J14-24-B-0252-0001 (WBSCM Number 2000009904). The following commodi�es were purchased in 

support of CCC-TEFAP Domestic Food Distribu�on Programs. 

Deliveries are to be made from July 01, 2024, through December 31, 2024. 

The Contrac�ng Officer will not consider any addi�onal or further offers under Solicitaton 12-3J14-24-B-0252-0001 

(WBSCM Number 2000009904). CPP extends our apprecia�on to all bidders for showing an interest in supplying 

agricultural commodi�es for USDA/Domestic Programs. 

Further informa�on can be obtained from the Commodity Procurement Program, Agricultural Marke�ng Service, USDA, 

Room 3522 South Building, Washington, DC 20250, telephone (202) 720-4517 or the website at 

http://www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food. 

Vendor Name Material Desciption UOM

Weighted Avg 

Price

Total Truckloads 

Award Awarded Qty

Not to Exceed 

Award Value

AMERIQUAL GROUP, LLC BEEF CHILI W/O BEANS CAN-24/24 OZ LB $1.6091 300 10,800,000 $21,568,680.00

AMERIQUAL GROUP, LLC BEEF STEW CAN-24/24 OZ LB $1.9113 300 10,800,000 $18,302,760.00

PCA: 12-3J14-24-B-0252-0001 March 6, 2024 18:04:00
Abatement Order filed April 7, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00472-CR

____________

CHRISTOPHER ANDREW JACKSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 263rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1322772

ABATEMENT ORDER

The record in this appeal does not contain the trial court’s findings of fact 

and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s second statement, which 

was the subject of his motion to suppress. Article 38.22, section 6 of the Texas 

Code of Criminal Procedure requires the trial court to make written fact findings 

and conclusions of law as to whether a challenged statement was made voluntarily, 

even if appellant did not request them or object to their absence. Tex. Code Crim. 
Proc. art. 38.22 ' 6; Urias v. State, 155 S.W.3d 141, 142 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). 

The statute is mandatory and the proper procedure to correct the error is to abate 

the appeal and direct the trial court to make the required findings and conclusions. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4; Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1987). 

Accordingly, the trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of 

fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s statement and have 

a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings filed with the clerk of this 

Court on or before May 4, 2015.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will 

also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party. 

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM
Eric Drake 

PO Box 833688 

Richardson, Texas 75083 

April 9, 20 IS 

HAND DELEVERED 

Clerk of Court 

Court of Appeals 

Fifty District of Texas at Dallas 

600 Commerce Street 

Suite 200 

Dallas, Texas 75202 

RE: Objection to the Court refUsal to allow oral arguments 

and Appellant's motion to recuse 

Dear Clerk of Court: 

RECEIVED 

Court of Appeals 

APR 0 9 2015 

Lisa Matz 

Clerk, 5th District 

Fl LED IN 

COURT OF APPEALS 

APR - 9 2015 

LISA MATZ 

CLERK, 5th DISTRICT 

The Appellant, Eric Drake is objecting to the Court's refusal to allow oral arguments on each and 

every one of the 5 (five) pending appeals in this Court. As the motion to recuse that the Appellant 

filed in the Court today states, it is the Appellant's belief that the Court has made the Appellant, 

Eric Drake wait on some of his cases for nearly two years to group those cases together-to deny 

all of those cases. All cases pending in this Court will be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. 

Some of the Appellant's pending cases are at a level of extremely unusual and complicated cases 

that combines both federal and state law that the Appellant believes that oral arguments would 

not only be beneficial to the Court, but particularly necessary. 

Therefore, the Appellant is making his requests for oral argument on all of five pending appeals. 

Furthermore, because this Court has been bias, prejudice, and racially motivated against the 

Appellant, he believes that the justices who have been selected to rule on his appeals should be 

recused, especially in the light of Justice Wright's letter and the accusations made against the 

Appellant and other problems over the years with justices who are set on denying anything the 

Appellant files in the court unless he has a white attorney who is representing him. Thus, the 

Appellant believes that none of the justices in this Court would be impartial to his cases. 

Therefore, please accept the Appellant's motion to recuse, which the Appellant is sure the Court 

will deny and the Appellant's requests for oral arguments. Appellant does not see a need to 

remind the Court that oral arguments per the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure is looked upon 

as an necessary element of the appeals process. I may be contacted at: 214-477-9288. 

Yours truly 

~
Exhibit 10.25

                          MORSE, ZELNICK, ROSE & LANDER
                         A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP

                                 450 PARK AVENUE
                          NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022-2605
                                  212-838-1177
                                FAX. 212-838-9190

                                 March 29, 2002

                                                            WRITER'S DIRECT LINE

                                                            (212) 838-8040

Mr. Thomas Stuckey
Milestone Scientific, Inc.
220 South Orange Avenue
Livingston, New Jersey 07039

Dear Tom:

      This will confirm that we have agreed to defer payment of the current
balance of fees due us for legal services rendered through February 28, 2002
($320,866.01) until January 2, 2003, except out of the proceeds of new equity
financings, provide that Milestone pays us $2,500 per month in reduction of this
accumulated balance.

                                                     Very truly yours,


                                                     Stephen A. Zelnick

cc: Mr. Leonard Osser
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION ONE

UNION BANK, N.A., a national banking

association,

Appellant,

No. 71168-7-

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

l*N3

CD

en

3*.

CO

3C

o o

-.so

s:r~

CSCft

o—

CHARLES M. DEYO and LAURIE L

DEYO, individually and the marital

community thereof, FILED: APR 1 3 2015 %0 s:<

Respondents.

Per Curiam — Following the Washington Supreme Court's decision in

Washington Federal v. Harvey. Wn.2d , 340 P.3d 846, 2015 WL 114165 (2015),

the parties in this appeal filed a stipulated motion for reversal of the trial court's order

dismissing this action under CR 12(b)(6). The parties also stipulate that the trial court

on remand shall determine the amount of any award for attorney fees and costs

incurred in the appellate proceedings.

We accept the parties' concession, reverse, and remand for further proceedings.

FOR THE COURT:
AMS Cooked Diced Chicken Contractor Pathogen Performance - Fiscal Year: 20211/,2/

Salmonella3/ L. monocytogenes4/

Contractor

# Sub-lots Produced 

(% of Total) # Positive % Positive # Positive % Positive

C1 524 (83.6) 0 0 0 0

C4 103 (16.4) 0 0 0 0

Total 627 (100.0) 0 0 0 0

1/A full description of the cooked diced chicken purchase program specification is available at https://www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food/product-specs#chicken. 2/Production Dates: October 1, 2020 to September 30, 2021. 3/Salmonella Critical Limit: Positive (+) Result / 25g. 4/L. monocytogenes Critical Limit: Positive (+) Result / 25g.
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief FinancialOfficer of CommunitySouth Financial Corporation (the “Company”), each certifythat, to his knowledge on the date of this certification:

 

1.    Thequarterly report of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2008 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | May 15, 2008 | By:                           | /s/ C. Allan Ducker, III |
|--------|-------------------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|   |              | C. Allan Ducker, III     |
|   |              | Chief Executive Officer       |
|   |              | (Principal Executive Officer) |
|   |              |                          |
| Date:  | May 15, 2008 | By:                           | /s/ John W. Hobbs             |
|   |              | John W. Hobbs                 |
|   |              | Chief Financial Officer       |
|   |              | (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
Attachment 3 Range of Chemical Composition

Sanitized
DISMISSED and Opinion Filed June 25, 2019 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-18-01224-CV EX PARTE NEHEMIAH J.D. JACKSON On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. X-14-1194-Y 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, J ustice Whitehill, and Justice Molb erg Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated A pril 4, 2019, we notified appellant the time for filing his brief had expired. We direct ed appellant to file a brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal w ithout further notice. To date, appellant has not file d his brief nor other wise corresponded wi th the Court regard ing the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

181224F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

EX PARTE: NEHEMIAH J.D. JACKSON
No. 05-18-01224-CV On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. X-14-1194-Y. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Whitehill and Molberg participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this app eal is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered June 25, 2019
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

I, Stuart D. Marvin,
Executive Vice President and Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust (the Registrant), do hereby certify pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



|                        |  |     |  |                                                                                                     
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: October 19, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Stuart D. Marvin                                                                                
|                        |  |     |  | Stuart D. Marvin Executive Vice President and
Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Accredited Mortgage
Loan REIT Trust and will be retained by Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Apollo Asset Backed Credit Company LLC (the“Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Rossitto, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

 
1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

 
2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

Date: March 28, 2024 

 
    
/s/ Robert Rossitto
 Robert Rossitto Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
 
***
*The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.*
**
### Adams, Kevin (OST) From: Sent: To: Subject:
Kevin: Alpena@save-a-lot-ffe.com Thursday, November 03, 2011 2:04PM Adams, Kevin (OST) john grochowski

Alpena needs the type of service that Delta provides. Without air Qualityairtransportation business will suffer. Also this will impede future business from coming to the area. We are alreadyat a disadvantage without an interstate near by. Talking to corporate business people airtransportation is keyto our area. John Grochowski Manager Save A Lot Alpena 989-356-9287

1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cellu Tissue
Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended November 26, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Senior Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies that:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrants.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ DAVID J. MORRIS                                       
|David J. Morris                                           
|Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|December 31, 2009
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 27, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 27, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0147. THE KENNESAW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF

KENNESAW, GEORGIA v. COLUMNS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

1317164