alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, David D’Addario, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wise Metals Group LLC; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 16, 2005
391 A.2d 682

#### Commonwealth v. Gardner, Appellant.

Submitted December 6, 1976.

John Myers, Assistant Defender, and Benjamin Lemer, Defender, for appellant; Robert B. Lawler, Assistant District Attorney, and Edward G. Rendell, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
EXHIBIT 32


                    CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the report of Ridgewood Energy L Fund, LLC (the "Fund") on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their
knowledge:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.


Dated: March 9, 2007                   RIDGEWOOD ENERGY L FUND, LLC

                           By:    /s/  ROBERT E. SWANSON
                                Name:  Robert E. Swanson
                               Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
                                       (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: March 9, 2007
                           By:    /s/  KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY
                                Name:  Kathleen P. McSherry
                               Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
                                       Officer
                                       (Principal Financial and Accounting
                                       Officer)



A signed original of this written statement or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
Ridgewood Energy L Fund, LLC and will be retained by Ridgewood Energy L Fund,
LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this report or as a
separate disclosure document.
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J.A. FISCHER, D.C. KING, S.A. DOMINGUEZ

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

DREW K. SCHMIDT

AVIATION STRUCTURAL MECHANIC AIRMAN APPRENTICE (E-2), U.S. 

NAVY

NMCCA 201500016

SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 21 October 2014.

Military Judge: CAPT Bethany Payton-O’Brien, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Helicopter Sea 

Combat Squadron SIX, NAS North Island, San Diego, CA.

For Appellant: CAPT James Talbert, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller, Esq.

9 April 2015

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). The supplemental 

court-martial order will reflect that the finding to 

Specification 3 of Additional Charge II is “Withdrawn and 

dismissed without prejudice.”

 

For the Court

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RAYMOND JOE TAYLOR,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 12

- 00143

- CR

Appeal from the

355th Judicial District Court

Hood County, Texas

Cause No. CR11748

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court bel ow. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2014.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE01304

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 68 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 68

                  Raising awareness of modern slavery.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 27, 2017

    Mr. Corker (for himself and Mr. Cardin) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                  Raising awareness of modern slavery.

Whereas it is estimated that tens of millions of children, women, and men around 
        the world are subjected to conditions of modern slavery;
Whereas the International Labour Organization estimates that modern slavery 
        generates more than $150,000,000,000 in criminal profits each year;
Whereas, despite being outlawed in every nation, modern slavery exists around 
        the world, including in the United States;
Whereas, around the world, 55 percent of forced labor victims are women or 
        girls, and nearly 1 in 5 victims of slavery is a child;
Whereas global leadership continues to coalesce around real and coordinated 
        actions to end modern slavery, as exemplified in statements by senior 
        officials such as U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May, who has stated, 
        ``Britain is leading the way in pioneering international efforts to 
        crack down on modern slavery--one of the great scourges of our world--
        wherever it is found.'';
Whereas, on December 23, 2016, the End Modern Slavery Initiative, a bipartisan 
        initiative, was authorized to help establish a powerful effort in 
        concert with the private sector and foreign governments to eliminate 
        modern slavery and human trafficking around the globe; and
Whereas, each year, individuals around the world join together to call for an 
        end to modern slavery by symbolically drawing a red ``X'' symbol on 
        their hands to share the message of the END IT movement: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commends each individual who supported the END IT 
        movement on February 23, 2017;
            (2) notes the dedication of individuals, organizations, and 
        governments to end modern slavery; and
            (3) calls for concerted, international action to bring an 
        end to modern slavery around the world.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2004094EN.01003301.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/33

---

Action brought on 17 March 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-143/04)

(2004/C 94/74)

An action against the Kingdom of Belgium was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 17 March 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by K. Banks, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (1) or, in any event, by failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (1) or, in any event, by failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13 of that directive;

1

| 2. | order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The period prescribed for transposition of that directive expired on 22 December 2002.

---

(1)  JO L 167, du 22 juin 2001, p. 10

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**SENECA GAMING CORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE OFFICERS**

 

(Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Seneca Gaming Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission, we, John Pasqualoni, InterimPresident and Chief Executive Officer, and Joseph A. D’Amato, Senior VicePresident, Finance and Administration, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.                                       The Quarterly Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the QuarterlyReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operation of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented inthe Form 10-Q.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.

 

 
| May 16, 2005                                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                             |
| /s/ John Pasqualoni                                                              |   |
| John  Pasqualoni                                                                 |
| Interim  President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)     |
|                                                                             |
|                                                                             |
| /s/ Joseph A. D’Amato                                                       |   |
| Joseph A. D’Amato                                                           |
| Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration (Principal  Financial Officer) |

 

 

The forgoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Qpursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9


                                  AMENDMENT TO
                         FINANCIAL CONSULTING AGREEMENT


     THIS AMENDMENT TO FINANCIAL CONSULTING AGREEMENT (this "Amendment"), is
made and entered into as of May 16, 2001 and amends that certain Financial
Consulting Agreement, dated as of December 31, 1996 (the "Agreement"), by and
between THE HALLWOOD GROUP INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation ("Hallwood
Group") and HSC FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Liberian corporation (the
"Consultant").

                                    RECITALS

     WHEREAS, the parties to the Agreement desire to amend the Agreement; and

     WHEREAS, Section 9(h) of the Agreement provides that the parties may amend
the Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings and agreements
contained in this Amendment and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as
follows:

                                   AGREEMENT

     1.   Amendment. Section 6(A) of the Agreement is hereby amended in its
entirety as follows:

     "A.  As compensation for the Consultant's services, Hallwood Group agrees
to pay to the Consultant an annual fee of Seven Hundred Ninety Five Thousand
Dollars ($795,000), payable in monthly installments of Sixty Six Thousand Two
Hundred Fifty Dollars ($66,250.00) on the first day of each month."

     2.   Continuation of Agreement. The Agreement shall continue in full force
and effect, as amended by this Amendment.

     3.   Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in multiple
counterparts, all of which shall be deemed originals, but all of which together
shall constitute one and the same instrument.




                            [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed and delivered
this Amendment as of the date first above written.

                                     HALLWOOD GROUP:

Address:                             THE HALLWOOD GROUP INCORPORATED
3710 Rawlins
Suite 1500
Dallas, Texas 75219                  By: /s/ MELVIN J. MELLE
                                         ----------------------------
                                     Name: Melvin J. Melle
                                           --------------------------
                                     Title: Vice President and CFO
                                            -------------------------

                                     CONSULTANT:

Address:                             HSC FINANCIAL CORPORATION
24, Avenue Princesse Grace
Monte-Carlo MC98000
Principality of Monaco               By: /s/ ANTHONY GUMBINER
                                         ----------------------------
                                     Name: Anthony Gumbiner
                                           --------------------------
                                     Title: Director
                                            -------------------------


                                       2
National Organic Standards Board 

Crops Committee 

2012 Sunset Recommendation 

Pheromones 

March 4, 2011 

List: §205.601 Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic crop production. 

(f) As insect management. Pheromones. 

Summary 

Pheromones were approved for listing in 1995. In 2002, the board voted to allow List 3 inerts 

used in passive pheromone dispensers, through approval of the following annotation: 

Pheromones -includes only EPA-exempt pheromone products, EPA-registered pheromone 

products with no additional synthetic toxicants unless listed in this section, and any inert 

ingredients used in such pheromone formulations that are not on EPA List 1 (Inerts of 

toxicological concern) or EPA List 2 (Potentially toxic inerts), Provided the pheromone 

products are limited to passive dispensers. Pheromone products containing only 

pheromones, active ingredients listed in this section, and List 4 inerts may be applied 

without restriction. 

The Crops Committee requested, but did not receive, a Technical Review (TR) for 

pheromones at the time the committee formulated its recommendation. Although the 

committee is concerned about making a decision about a diverse class of materials without 

adequate technical information, especially knowing that there have been problems with 

pheromone product ingredients —such as those used for the light brown apple moth— the 

committee wants to preserve the use of these products, which have become essential to 

organic fruit growing. There was discomfort around the issue of List 3 inerts being allowed 

ingredients in a permitted substance, but the committee trusts that the Inerts task force will be 

able to update and clarify the limitation on inerts in National List substances, and the board will 

be able to address this issue when inerts come up for review. When the committee receives 

the requested TR, it may reconsider this decision. 

The Crops Committee does think it is necessary to clarify that it is approving pheromone 

products that are in passive dispensers, that have no added toxicants, and that have inerts 

approved by this board. Passive dispensers are those which emit pheromones by volatilization 

rather than by spray and produce a concentration of pheromones in a limited area. 

Committee Recommendation 

The Crops Committee recommends the continued listing of pheromones for insect 

management with the addition of an annotation that limits their use to passive dispensers, 

without added toxicants, and with only approved inert ingredients. The motion was to amend 
Sunset 2012 Review 

Pheromones 

March 4, 2011Page 

2 of 2

the current listing of pheromones to read: “(f) As insect management. Pheromones, provided 

that they are in passive dispensers, without added toxicants, and with only approved inert 

ingredients.” 

Committee Vote 

Motion: Barry Flamm, Second: Nick Maravell 

Yes: 5 No: 0 Absent: 2 Abstain: 0 Recuse: 0
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

EDWARD D. IOLI TRUST, 

GENERAL TRAFFIC CONTROLS, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

VIGILANT VIDEO, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant

MVCONNECT, LLC,

Defendant

______________________ 

2014-1714

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:10-cv-00605-JRG, 

Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

ERIC WILLIAM BUETHER, Buether Joe & Carpenter 

LLC, Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. 

ROY B. THOMPSON, Thompson Bogran, P.C., Lake 

Oswego, OR, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by AMY M. BOGRAN. 
 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 10, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
# C_2004106EN.01002301.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/23

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Amtsgericht Niebüll by order of that Court of 2 June 2003 in the family-law case of Standesamt Niebüll (relating to the determination of the birth name of the German child Leonhard Matthias)

(Case C-96/04)

(2004/C 106/41)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Amtsgericht Niebüll (Niebüll Local Court) of 2 June 2003, received at the Court Registry on 26 February 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the family-law case of Standesamt Niebüll (relating to the determination of the birth name of the German child Leonhard Matthias) on the following questions:

In light of the prohibition on discrimination set out in Article 12 EC and having regard to the right to the freedom of movement for every citizen of the Union laid down in Article 18 EC, is the German provision on the conflict of laws contained in Article 10 of the EGBGB valid, in so far as it provides that the right to bear a name is governed by nationality alone?

---
# Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District

JUNE 23, 2016

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b).

1. Case No. SD34061

Re: JOSEPH RAYMOND SHAW, Movant-Appellant,

vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.

2. Case No. SD34118

Re: JAMES W. PIETZ, Appellant,

vs. LINDA L. PIETZ, Respondent.

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b).

1. Case No. SD33997

Re: STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent,

vs. CHARLES C. GOFORTH, Defendant-Appellant.