alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ACTIO N 

SI 0-110120-05 n^ 8 

Pettiford, Marie (OST) CONTROL r-JO 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Tamara Eastaugh [tamaramill@hotmail.com] 

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 5:14 PM 

LaHood, Ray (OST) 

Southeast Alaska Essential Air Service 

T3 

January 19, 2011 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation _ 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. <^ c/:; 

Washington, D.C. 20590 ^ 

Re: Continuation of Alaska Airlines' Essential Air Service at Cordova. Gustavus. Petersburg. Wranoell. and Yakutat. Alaska, Docket 

OST-1998-4899 

Dear Secretary LaHood, 

This letter is to express strong support for the selection of Alaska Airlines to continue to provide essential air service to our community. 

Alaska's current pattern of service - using jet aircraft - meets crucial needs that would be difficult, if not impossible, to meet with any 

other type of service or aircraft type: 

Alaska's service connects Southeast Alaska passengers to one or more major communities of interest, with single-plane service to 

Anchorage, Juneau, Ketchikan or Seattle. From these hubs, our community can access the airline's extensive route system and benefit 

from its marketing relationships with other carriers. The 737-400 combination ("combi") passenger and cargo aircraft, which Alaska 

Airlines proposes to continue using on this route, provides freight, mail and cargo capacity that a non-jet carrier simply cannot provide. 

Further, the 737-400 combi aircraft is equipped with Required Navigation Performance Technology precision technology, which enables 

the airtine to reliably access the airport during inclement weather, thus reducing diversions and cancellations and, in tum, enabling 

people and products to dependably reach the community. In sum, Alaska's jet service is critical to the economic well being of our 

community. Living on an island we already feel trapped because we are unable to drive to other cities. Alaska Airtines is one of our only 

ways off the island in an emergency situation where someone needs to get to a bigger hospital or a family memt>er is ill. Please make 

sure this route to Southeast Alaska continues. 

Sincerely, 

Tamara Eastaugh 

PC Box 722 

Wrangell, Alaska 

99929 

9078742999
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 492

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Welcoming Her Majesty Queen Sirikit of Thailand

upon her arrival in the United States.

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 492

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the United States and the Kingdom of Thailand

have enjoyed 169 years of peaceful and constructive relations since the signing of the Treaty of Amity and Commerce in 1833;

Whereas the aforesaid document was the first such treaty

signed between the United States and any Asian nation;
2

•HCON 492 EH

Whereas the United States enjoys both a bilateral security

agreement and a military assistance agreement with

Thailand and conducts several military exercises with the

armed forces of Thailand every year, the largest of which

is the Cobra Gold exercise;

Whereas Her Majesty Queen Sirikit has made major contributions to advancing the social and economic welfare

and health of the people of Thailand, most notably as

President of the Thai Red Cross Society;

Whereas in order to assist the rural poor of Thailand, Her

Majesty Queen Sirikit serves as patron and chairperson

of the Foundation for the Promotion of Supplementary

Occupations and Related Techniques (SUPPORT);

Whereas in her capacity as President of the Thai Red Cross

Society, Her Majesty Queen Sirikit established the Khao

Larn Thai Red Cross Center to provide food, shelter, and

medical attention to Cambodian refugees fleeing turmoil

in their country; and

Whereas Her Majesty Queen Sirikit’s contributions to the

welfare of Thai citizens and of international refugees

have been widely recognized by groups as diverse as the

United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, the

Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, and the British

Royal College of Physicians: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress welcomes Her Majesty

3 Queen Sirikit on her visit to the United States, and ex4 presses the hope that her visit will further strengthen the
3

•HCON 492 EH

1 deep historical relationship between the United States and

2 the Kingdom of Thailand.

Passed the House of Representatives October 16,

2002.

Attest:

Clerk.
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Laurence Stephenson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date:  January 16, 2006 | /s/ 
Laurence Stephenson
Laurence Stephenson
President (Principal Executive Officer)
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Opinion issued January 23, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00541-CV

———————————

SERGY V LEMESHKO, Appellant

V.

ELIZABETH ANNE THOMAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 310th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2008-03762

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 29, 2013, Appellant, Sergy V. Lemeshko, filed a document 

entitled “Appellant’s Brief,” which, upon review, we construe as a motion to 

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). No opinion has issued and 

although appellant has failed to include a certificate of conference in his motion, 
2

more than 10 days have passed and no party has responded to the motion. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a). 

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland and Brown.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D.C., 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES, AND TOXICSUBSTANCES February 18, 2010 Andrew S. Hartten Project Director DuPont Corporate Remediation Group Barley Mill Plaza - Bldg. 19 4417 Lancaster Pike Wilmington, DE 19805 Attn: Memorandumof Understanding (MOU) between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and E L DuPont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) for a Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) EPA notification of the Company and the public of the need for an extension Dear Mr . Hartten: This letter is submitted pursuant to Sections V.E.2.mof the above-identified MOU which provides for EPA to request an extension to reviewthe Response to Peer Consultation Panel Input and Outline of Phase III Work Plan Pursuant to the Memorandumof Understanding Between US EPA and DuPont Company dated December 18, 2009

. The DuPont Response was received in my office December 18, 2009. The MOU provides 30 days for EPAto provide input on the Response. EPA obtained an additional 30 days for its review with an extension to February 18, 2010 . ' Due to the recent unforeseen closure of the government due to weather conditions, EPAwill need another 2 weeks to complete its review . Thus we will provide our input to you no later than March 4, 2010. ^,

emical Control Division (7405M) -

cc: EPA Docket ID No. : OPPT-2004-0113 180 ON SNIV1N0O r-T



### ector " "Cathy Fehrenbacher - Mail Code 7406M

Lawrence Libelo - Mail Code 7406M David W . Boothe E. I . du Pont de Nemours and Company 4417 Lancaster Pike, CRP 708/110 Wilmington, DE 19805
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 22799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9155]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR


Royalty Policy Committee (RPC) Notice of Renewal

AGENCY: Office of Natural Resources Revenue, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of renewal of the Royalty Policy Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Following consultation with the General Services 
Administration, notice is hereby given that the Secretary of the 
Interior is renewing the Royalty Policy Committee.
    The Royalty Policy Committee provides advice to the Secretary of 
the Interior on the management of Federal and Indian mineral leases and 
revenues under the laws governing the Department of the Interior. The 
Committee will also review and comment on revenue management and other 
mineral and energy-related policies, and provide a forum to convey 
views representative of mineral lessees, operators, revenue payors, 
revenue recipients, governmental agencies, and public interest groups. 
The Royalty Policy Committee reports to the Secretary of the Interior 
through the Director of the Office of Natural Resources Revenue.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Shirley Conway, Office of Natural 
Resources Revenue; 1801 Pennsylvania Avenue; Washington, DC 20006; 
telephone number (202) 254-5554.

Certification

    I hereby certify that the renewal of the Royalty Policy Committee 
is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties 
imposed on the Department of the Interior by 43 U.S.C. 1331 et. seq.

     Dated: April 2, 2012.
Ken Salazar,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 2012-9155 Filed 4-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-T2-P
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 71 (Thursday, April 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 22057]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8749]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA).

ACTION: Notice of open Federal Advisory Committee meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The SBA is issuing this notice to announce the location, date, 
time and agenda for the third quarter meetings of the National Small 
Business Development Center (SBDC) Advisory Board.

DATES: The meetings for the 3rd quarter will be held on the following 
dates: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 at 1:00pm EST, Tuesday, May 15, 2012 at 
1:00pm EST, Tuesday, June 19, 2012 at 1:00pm EST.

ADDRESSES: These meetings will be held via conference call.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), SBA announces the 
meetings of the National SBDC Advisory Board. This Board provides 
advice and counsel to the SBA Administrator and Associate Administrator 
for Small Business Development Centers.

    The purpose of these meetings is to discuss following issues 
pertaining to the SBDC Advisory Board:

--SBA Update.
--Regional Meetings.
--Board Assignments.
--Member Roundtable.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The meeting is open to the public 
however advance notice of attendance is requested. Anyone wishing to be 
a listening participant must contact Alanna Falcone by fax or email. 
Her contact information is Alanna Falcone, Program Analyst, 409 Third 
Street SW., Washington, DC 20416, Phone, 202-619-1612, Fax 202-481-
0134, email, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0f6e636e61616e21696e636c60616a4f7c6d6e21686079"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f59499949b9b94db939499969a9b90b5869794db929a83">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Additionally, if you need accommodations because of a disability or 
require additional information, please contact Alanna Falcone at the 
information above.

Dan S. Jones,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-8749 Filed 4-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00792-CV

BEXAR COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE,

Appellant

v.

Frank HERNANDEZ,

Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-14755

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice 

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 8, 2015

APPEAL DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant’s brief in this accelerated appeal was originally due on January 30, 2015. 

Appellant has been granted one extension of time, until February 19, 2015. On March 4, 2015, 

appellant’s attorney, Mr. Troy Meinke, advised this court that appellant would file a motion to 

dismiss the appeal by March 5, 2015. Subsequent calls from the Clerk of this court to counsel 

were not returned. Accordingly, on March 19, 2015, this court ordered Mr. Meinke to file 

appellant’s brief no later than March 30, 2015. Our order cautioned Mr. Meinke that if appellant’s
04-14-00792-CV

brief was not filed by this date, this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.8(a).

On March 24, 2015, Mr. Meinke filed a Motion to Dismiss this appeal. However, it appears 

Mr. Meinke has not served appellee’s counsel with a copy of the motion or otherwise complied 

with the applicable Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Telephone calls from the Clerk of this 

court to Mr. Meinke regarding the proper filing of pleadings in compliance with the rules have not 

been returned. 

Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM

- 2 -
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 76 (Thursday, April 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23495]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9486]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLNM940000.L1420000.BJ0000]


Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey, New Mexico

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plats of survey described below are scheduled to be 
officially filed in the New Mexico State Office, Bureau of Land 
Management, Santa Fe, New Mexico, thirty (30) calendar days from the 
date of this publication.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: These plats will be available for 
inspection in the New Mexico State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 
301 Dinosaur Trail, Santa Fe, New Mexico. Copies may be obtained from 
this office upon payment. Contact Marcella Montoya at 505-954-2097, or 
by email at: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#93def2e1f0f6fffff2ccdefcfde7fceaf2d3fdfebdf1fffebdf4fce5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6f220e1d0c0a03030e302200011b00160e2f0102410d030241080019">[email protected]</span></a>, for assistance. Persons who 
use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above 
individual during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

New Mexico Principal Meridian, New Mexico (NM)

    The plat, in nine sheets, representing the dependent resurvey and 
survey, in Township 23 North, Range 8 East, of the New Mexico Principal 
Meridian, accepted March 26, 2012, for Group 905 NM.
    These plats are scheduled for official filing 30 days from the 
notice of publication in the Federal Register, as provided for in the 
BLM Manual Section 2097--Opening Orders. Notice from this office will 
be provided as to the date of said publication. If a protest against a 
survey, in accordance with 43 CFR 4.450-2, of the above plats is 
received prior to the date of official filing, the filing will be 
stayed pending consideration of the protest.
    A plat will not be officially filed until the day after all 
protests have been dismissed and become final or appeals from the 
dismissal affirmed.
    A person or party who wishes to protest against any of these 
surveys must file a written protest with the Bureau of Land Management 
New Mexico State Director stating that they wish to protest.
    A statement of reasons for a protest may be filed with the Notice 
of protest to the State Director or the statement of reasons must be 
filed with the State Director within thirty (30) days after the protest 
is filed.

Robert A. Casias,
Deputy State Director, Cadastral Survey/GeoSciences.
[FR Doc. 2012-9486 Filed 4-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0239

CITY OF BILLINGS,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MERCEDES A. BENNICK,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 23, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 13 2023

02/13/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0239
Specialty Specialty Crops 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.

Crops Inspection Room 1536-S, STOP 0240

Program Division Washington, DC 20250-0240

March 1, 2017 

 

AMENDMENT NO. 3

COMMODITY SPECIFICATION

DRIED FRUIT – AUGUST 2014

The purpose of this amendment is to make the following additions in the Commodity 

Specification:

• Add exceptions to (CID) to I. General requirements

• Add Order of Precedence for requirements

• Further clarify the Packing, Labels and Packaging requirements for primary containers

• Add additional color type varieties for fig pieces

I. General

B. Exceptions to U.S. Standards/CID’s 

Exceptions to the U.S. Standards for the Department of Agriculture (USDA) dried fruit 

purchases and/or Commercial Item Description (CID) are found in Section II, Individual 

Commodity Specifications, of this document. 

1. Order of Precedence

If the contract documents are inconsistent or contradictory, the following order of 

precedence will prevail: IFB, Master Solicitation, Amendments to the Commodity 

Specifications, and Commodity Specifications and/or Supplement(s).

H. Packing, Labels and Packaging

1. Primary Containers

a) All products must be packed in new, commercially acceptable primary 

containers which meet all applicable FDA requirements (link to: FDA Food 

Labeling Regulations). Retail labels must meet minimum requirements as 

specified in the Master Solicitation.

b) For containers with net weight of 3 pounds or less. 

• Must meet the minimum FDA labeling requirements (shown below)
• Product labeling/packaging shall also have at least 2 additional colors 

other than black and/or white and a visual representation of the product 

if the container is not clear. 

Minimum FDA labeling requirements are:

• Statement of identity, or name of the food

• Net quantity statement

• Ingredient statement

• Manufacturer or distributor location statement

• Allergen declaration (if product contains a major allergen)

• Suitably code marked so that the product can be identified with related 

inspection certificates or in the event of a recall

II. Individual Commodity Specifications

H. Fig Pieces 

2. Type: 

Color types of dried figs.

a. White figs (or white type figs) are white to dark brown in color and include

 such varieties as Adriatic and Adriatic types (Conadria, DiRedo, Tena, 

Adam, Sierra, etc.), Calimyrna, and Kadota. Calimyrna variety may not be comingled with other varieties.

b. Black figs (or black type figs) are black or dark purple in color as in the

 Mission varieties.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending February 28, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Harpreet Singh Sangha, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date:  April 19, 2006 | /s/ Harpreet Singh Sangha
Harpreet Singh Sangha
Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Douglas Lake Minerals Inc. and will be retained by Douglas Lake Minerals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]