alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6707

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

JOHN WAYNE WHITE, a/k/a Whitey, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, 

Senior District Judge. (3:96-cr-00006-GCM-6) 

Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 25, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

John Wayne White, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

John Wayne White appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. White, 

No. 3:96-cr-00006-GCM-6 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2009). We deny 

White’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1



906 Certification



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DreamWorks Animation
SKG, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                           
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|                       | 
|Dated: August 12, 2005 |  | /s/    JEFFREY
KATZENBERG                 
|                       |  | Jeffrey Katzenberg Chief Executive Officer
|                       | 
|Dated: August 12, 2005 |  | /s/    KRISTINA M.
LESLIE                 
|                       |  | Kristina M. Leslie Chief Financial Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 2070** 

L. RUTHER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DISCOUNT TIRE CO. OF VA, INC.; GG HOSPITALITY, LLC , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv - 01046

- LO

- MSN )

Submitted : January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN , and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

L. Ruther , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
L. Ruther appeals the district court ’ s order summarily
dismissin g his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruther v. Discount Tire Co. of VA, Inc. ,
No. 1:16

- cv - 01046

- LO

- MSN (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2016) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-053-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Exhibit 31.2



PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, Patrick McGrath, the Chief Financial Officer of Furio Resources Inc., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Furio Resources Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date: April 5, 2005



/s/ Patrick McGrath

Name: Patrick McGrath

Title: Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director
# C_2004094EN.01002901.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/29

---

Action brought on 26 February 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Italian Republic

(Case C-99/04)

(2004/C 94/64)

An action against the Italian Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 26 February 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by G. Valero Jordana and R. Amorosi, acting as Agents.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/80/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants, or, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 18(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/80/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants, or, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 18(1) of that directive;

1

| — | order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The period for transposition of the directive expired on 27 November 2002.

---

(1)  OJ L 309, 27.11.2001, p. 1.

1

---
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. PD-1358-15, 1359-15, 1360-15, 1361-15

ERIC L. BAUMGART, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HARRIS COUNTY

Per Curiam.

O R D E R

The Court grants review on its own motion of the following question:

Did the court of appeals err in its application of Penal Code § 2.02?

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order. The State’s

brief is due thirty days after the timely filing of Appellant’s brief. Oral argument will

not be permitted.
BAUMGART- 2

The Clerk of this Court will send copies of this order to the Court of Appeals for the

Fourteenth District, the State Prosecuting Attorney, the District Attorney for Harris County,

and Appellant.

Entered March 9, 2016

Do Not Publish
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Longhai Steel, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dr.
Eberhard Kornotzki, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
            /s/
      Dr. Eberhard KornotzkiDr.
      Eberhard KornotzkiChief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
    Officer)




Date:
August 13, 2010
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit (4)(j)

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                           FIFTH THIRD CAPITAL TRUST V

         THIS Certificate of Trust of Fifth Third Capital Trust V (the "Trust"),
dated December 17, 2001, is being duly executed and filed by Wilmington Trust
Company, a Delaware banking corporation, as trustee, to form a business trust
under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C. Section 3801 et seq.).

         1. Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is Fifth Third
Capital Trust V.

         2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of
the Trust in the State of Delaware is Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney Square
North, 1100 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001. Attn:
Corporate Trust Administration.

         3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective on
December 17, 2001.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the sole trustee of the
Trust, has executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first above
written.

                                         WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,
                                         as trustee


                                         By:  /s/ DONALD G. MACKELCAN
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Name:   Donald G. MacKelcan
                                              Title:  Vice President
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Danny Mendelson, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wise Metals Group, LLC; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 19, 2004 

 

/S/    DANNY MENDELSON

Danny Mendelson

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial

Officer and Secretary
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1020 

To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to require Members of 

Congress to disclose business ties with foreign entities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2019 

Mr. POSEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to require 

Members of Congress to disclose business ties with foreign entities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISCLOSURE BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS OF 

4 BUSINESS TIES WITH FOREIGN ENTITIES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 102 of the Ethics in Gov6 ernment Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App. 102) is amended by 

7 adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(j) Any report filed pursuant to section 101(d) by 

9 a Member of Congress shall include the disclosure of any 

10 business ties the Member or any member of the Member’s 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1020 IH

1 immediate family has (if any) with a foreign entity. If a 

2 Member of Congress makes an affirmative disclosure of 

3 any such ties, the Member shall include information detail4 ing the nature of the business tie and foreign entity.’’. 

5 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by sub6 section (a) shall apply to any report filed pursuant to sec7 tion 101(d) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 

8 U.S.C. App. 101(d)) after the date of enactment of this 

9 Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0582

_________________

PERKINS FAMILY HOLDINGS, LLC, a 

Montana Limited Liability Company

 Plaintiff and Appellant,

 v.

THE TILE GUYS, LLC, and MARSHAL RAY 

BUTTERFIELD, an individual,

 Defendants and Appellees.

O R D E R

_________________

On October 4, 2023, Appellant filed a Notice of Appeal in this matter. In that 

Notice, Appellant asserted that “all available transcripts of the proceedings in this case 

have NOT been ordered from the court reporter contemporaneously with the filing of this 

notice of appeal, but will be ordered within 11 days of the filing of the notice of appeal.” 

On October 27, 2023, the District Court record was filed in this Court. To date, no 

transcripts have been filed.

IT IS ORDERED that, on or before December 28, 2023, Appellant shall file a report 

on the status of this appeal. Failure to file a status report within that time will result in 

dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and without further notice.

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to all parties.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 7 2023

12/07/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0582
# C_2004106EN.01009004.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/90 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/90

---

Removal from the Register of Case T-407/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 106/183)

(Language of the case: Italian)

(Language of the case: Italian)

By order of 18 March 2004, the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the Register of Case T-407/03 Antonio Aresu v Commission of the European Communities.

Antonio Aresu

Commission of the European Communities

---

(1)  OJ C 35 of 7.2.04.

1

---
#### COMMERCIAL FISHERIES ENTRY COMMISSION, State of Alaska, Appellant, v. John EIDE and Winifred Bauge, Appellees.

Nos. 4623, 4624.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

April 4, 1980.

Jonathan K. Tillinghast, Asst. Atty. Gen., Avrum M. Gross, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellant.

J. P. Tangen and Pamela Finley, Robertson, Monagle, Eastaugh & Bradley, Juneau, for appellees.

Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., .CONNOR, BOOCHEVER. and BURKE, JJ., and DIMOND, Senior Justice.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

■ These appeals raise the same issues as *Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. Apokedak,*606 P.2d 1255 (Alaska, 1980). For the reasons set forth in our opinion in that case, the order of the superior court reversing the decisions of the Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission which denied the appellees’ applications for limited entry permits is reversed.1

REVERSED.

MATTHEWS, J., not participating.

1

. We note that it is alleged that appellee Winifred Bauge fished with Arnold Bauge, a gear licensee, from 1960 until his death in 1972, and that they lived together as husband and wife, although not legally married. Winifred Bauge apparently has been held to be the owner of the vessel and gear fished by Arnold Bauge and her, although she never fished as a gear licensee. The issues of whether she is entitled to apply for a gear license as representative of his estate, and the validity of the provisions of 20 AAC 05.530, which although authorizing applications by representatives of estates of individuals who were eligible to apply for entry permits limits such applications to instances when the death of such individuals occurred after specified dates, are not before us.
Paul Douglas s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 10, 2015

No. 04-15-00155-CV

BEXAR COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT dba University Health System,

Appellant

v.

Paul Douglas HARLAN,

Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-11941

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On April 6, 2015, the trial court clerk notified this Court that the clerk’s record was not 

filed because appellant has failed to pay, or make arrangements to pay, the clerk’s fee for 

preparing the record. Appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. 

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten 

(10) days of the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements 

have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the 

clerk=s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed 

for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court