alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.31

EXECUTIVE OFFICER MANDATORY RETIREMENT POLICY
As Updated through January 1, 2005

The
company shall require mandatory retirement for its executive officers under the following conditions.

Each
executive officer of the company shall be required to retire from employment with the company by the end of the calendar year in which he or she reaches age 65 provided he or she (1) has
been employed in a bona fide executive or high policy-making position for the two-year period immediately before retirement and (2) is entitled to an immediate
non-forfeitable annual retirement benefit from the company's pension, profit sharing, or deferred compensation plan(s) (or any combination of these plans) equal at least to the limit as
established in the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ($44,000 as of December 11, 1992). Mandatory retirement pursuant to this policy will not be deemed involuntary termination of employment
for purposes of severance pay or any other benefits.

An
executive officer who meets the mandatory retirement criteria specified in the prior paragraph may continue in the employment of the company beyond the end of the calendar year in which he or she
reaches age 65 if, and only if the board of directors approves the continuance of employment. In this situation, employment may continue until such time as the board, in its sole discretion, withdraws
the approval for continued employment.

The
company's Executive Officer Severance Pay Policy and Separation of Employment Policy will govern all other aspects of the termination of employment of executive officers.

---



QuickLinks
**Ex 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

                Inconnection with the quarterly report of Lazy Days’ R.V. Center, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Charles L. Thibault, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to my knowledge:

                (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                (2)The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

|   |  /s/ Charles L. Thibault      |
|--------|------------------------------------|
|   |                               |
|   |                               |
|   | Lazy Days’ R.V.  Center, Inc. |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer           |

 

 

 

November 15, 2004

 

----

 

 

 

----
LMS Consulting, 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 6, 2015

No. 04-14-00827-CV

PERSONAL TOUCH HOLDING CORP., and PT Intermediate Holding, Inc.,

Appellants

v.

LMS CONSULTING, LLC,

Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-00450

Peter Sakai, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellee’s motion for leave to file a surreply is GRANTED.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 23.1









Consent
of Independent Auditors



We hereby consent to the use of our Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated May 31, 2023 in Medies Inc. Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended February 28, 2023,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



We also consent to the references to us under the headings
“Experts” in such Registration Statement.





Bush & Associates CPA LLC

Henderson, Nevada

May 31, 2023






179
N. Gibson Road, Henderson, Nevada 89014 • 702.703.5979 • www.bushandassociatescpas.com
Exhibit 35.1





Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.








This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 20, 2023 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2023-2 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.  I further certify as follows:





1. I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from September 20, 2023 through December 31, 2023, and its performance under the Agreement.





2. To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.








AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.





By:/s/ Connie CoffeyDated:March 4, 2024Connie CoffeyExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent to grant to Aurora Technologies, LLC a revocable, nonassignable, exclusive license to practice in the United States, the Government-owned inventions described in Navy Case 101713 entitled Laser Treated Heat Transfer Surface.//Navy Case 101445 entitled Surface Enhancement Via Applied Laser Energy.

# DATES:

Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later than May 7, 2012.

# ADDRESSES:

Written objections are to be filed with the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code OOL, Bldg. 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522-5001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Christopher Monsey, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code OOL, Bldg 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522-5001, telephone 812-854-4100.

Authority:35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.

J.M. Beal,

Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-9573 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32


                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                       CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Shane Lowry,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Quantum
Energy Inc. (the "Company"),  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:

(i)
      the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
      ended May 31,  2007  (the  "Quarterly  Report")  fully  complies  with the
      requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and

(ii)
      the information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

By:
           /s/ Shane Lowry
           -------------------------------------------
Name:      Shane Lowry
Title:     Chief Executive Officer and
           Chief Financial Officer
Date:      July 25 , 2007


This  written  statement  is being  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB.  A
signed  original of this  statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.


This certification  accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall  not,  except to the
extent  required  by such Act, be deemed  filed by the  Company for  purposes of
Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as amended (the  "Exchange
Act").  Such  certification  will not be deemed to be  incorporated by reference
into any filing under the  Securities  Act of 1933, as amended,  or the Exchange
Act,  except to the extent  that the  Company  specifically  incorporates  it by
reference.
ACCEPTED

01-14-00846-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/7/2015 4:05:00 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/7/2015 4:05:00 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1126 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to provide inscriptions for spouses and children on certain 

headstones and markers furnished by the Secretary. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2019 

Mr. LAMALFA (for himself, Mr. PANETTA, Mr. JONES, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. 

POSEY, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. BANKS, and Mr. CUNNINGHAM) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide inscriptions for 

spouses and children on certain headstones and markers 

furnished by the Secretary. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honoring Veterans’ 

5 Families Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1126 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROVISION OF INSCRIPTIONS FOR SPOUSES AND 

2 CHILDREN ON CERTAIN HEADSTONES AND 

3 MARKERS FURNISHED BY THE SECRETARY 

4 OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2306 of title 38, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(i)(1) In the case of an individual for whom the Sec9 retary has furnished a headstone or marker for the un10 marked grave of the individual in a non-VA cemetery 

11 under subsection (a) or for whom the Secretary has fur12 nished a headstone or marker under subsection (d), the 

13 Secretary may, if feasible and upon request, replace the 

14 headstone or marker to add an inscription for the sur15 viving spouse or eligible dependent child of such individual 

16 following the death of the surviving spouse or eligible de17 pendent child. 

18 ‘‘(2) If the spouse or eligible dependent child of an 

19 individual referred to in paragraph (1) predeceases the in20 dividual, the Secretary may, if feasible and upon request, 

21 include an inscription for the spouse or dependent child 

22 on the headstone or marker furnished for the individual 

23 under subsection (a) or (d). 

24 ‘‘(3) In this section, the term ‘non-VA cemetery’ 

25 means— 

26 ‘‘(A) a veterans’ cemetery owned by a State; or 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1126 IH

1 ‘‘(B) a State, local, tribal, or private ceme2 tery.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (i) of section 

4 2306 of title 38, United States Code, as added by sub5 section (a) shall apply with respect to an individual who 

6 dies on or after October 1, 2018. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
<Page>

                                                                ARTHUR ANDERSEN

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                    -----------------------------------------

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our report
dated March 20, 2002, covering the audited financial statements of Variable
Account D (and to all references to our Firm) included in or made a part of
this Registration Statement File No. 333-79701 for Fortis Benefits Insurance
Company Variable Account D on Form N-4.

Hartford, Connecticut                                   /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
April 17, 2002
Exhibit
10.6


 


Gaiam,
Inc.


Executive
Officer Salaries


 


	
  Name

  	
   

  	
  Title

  	
   

  	
  Annual Base Salary

  	
   

  
	
  Jirka Rysavy

  	
   

  	
  Chairman and Chief
  Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  290,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Lynn Powers

  	
   

  	
  President, Chief Executive Officer of North American Operations,
  Secretary

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  290,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Janet Mathews

  	
   

  	
  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  175,000
**Exhibit15.2**

** **

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Shell Company Report on Form 20-F, of our report dated February 14, 2024, whichincludes an explanatory paragraph relating to two’s ability to continue as a going concern, relating to the financial statementsof two as of and for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, which is contained in Registration Statement on Form F-4 (FileNo. 333-275972). We also consent to the reference to us under the caption “Auditors” and “Statement by Experts”in the Shell Company Report.

 

/s/WithumSmith+Brown, PC 

 

NewYork, New York

March29, 2024
1400 Independence Avenue, SW.

Room 2635-S

Washington, DC 20250-0201

Instructions for Completion of the Application for Service covering the Export of 

Further Processed Eggs and Egg Products

• General Instructions for Worksheet

The certificate must be completed in a legible manner (typed preferably). 

1. Consignor/Exporter: Name and address (street, town and region/province/state, as 

applicable) of the natural or legal person or entity arranging shipment of the consignment.

2. Producer/Manufacturer: Name and address of the natural or legal person or entity that

has produced the consignment.

3. Point of Contact: A company representative identified to serve as the point of contact.

4. Telephone: Identify the phone number for the designated representative for the exporting 

company.

5. Fax number: Identify the number for receipt of a facsimile transmission.

6. Contact email: Email address for correspondence with designated company contact.

7. Name of Product (include description): Commercial name of product (not brand name) 

with specific description of the individual product(s) providing the egg component(s), 

ingredients of animal origin, and non-egg ingredients. Include the applicable harmonized 

schedule code.

8. Country of Destination: name of the country of destination of the product. Include the 

ISO 3166 two digit country code.
Air Pollution Control Program 

Missouri Department of Natural Resources 

P.O. Box 176 

Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 

Dear Ms. Moore 

This letter is in response to your October 9, 2015 submission of the "Nonattainment Area Plan for the 

2010 1-Hour Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standard" for the Jackson County 

nonattainment area. This submittal contains nonattainment plan provisions, as obligated by Section 

172( c) of the Clean Air Act, for the portion of Jackson County designated nonattainment by EPA (78 FR 

47192) effective October 4, 2013, under the 2010 sulfur dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standard. 

We have performed a completeness review of your submittal against the completeness criteria set forth 

at 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V. We have determined that this SIP submission satisfies the completeness criteria. A finding of completeness merely indicates that the submission meets the criteria that any plan 

must satisfy for EPA to take rulemaking action on it. A completeness finding is not a finding on the 

merits of the plan or whether it meets EPA's State Implementation Plan approval requirements. 

If you have any questions or need additional information please contact David Peter, of my staff, at 

peter.david@epa.gov or (913) 551-7397. 

fL...r.... Becky Weber 

(] · '- Director 

Air and Waste Management Division 

*Printed on Recycled Paper
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SCOTT ERIC CONNER,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

AARON D. WINSLOW,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 09-55941

D.C. No. 5:07-cv-00218-AG-AN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Andrew J. Guilford, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Scott Eric Conner, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of his

FILED

JUN 15 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-55941

rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments in connection with a fight

with another inmate and ensuing disciplinary proceedings. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for

failure to exhaust administrative remedies, Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117

(9th Cir. 2003), and we affirm.

Conner waived his right to challenge the district court’s factual findings. 

See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1146-47 (9th Cir. 2007) (failure to object to

a magistrate judge’s recommendation waives all objections to the magistrate

judge’s findings of fact, but does not ordinarily waive objections to purely legal

conclusions). 

The district court properly dismissed Conner’s claims because he failed to

exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit. See Woodford v. Ngo, 548

U.S. 81, 93-95 (2006) (holding that “proper exhaustion” under 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1997e(a) is mandatory and requires adherence to administrative procedural

rules); Griffin v. Arpaio, 557 F.3d 1117, 1120 (9th Cir. 2009) (affirming dismissal

for failure to exhaust prison remedies where inmate’s grievance failed to “alert[]

the prison to the nature of the wrong for which redress [was] sought.”). 

Conner’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                  338,277,000
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                 62,157,000
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      50,997,000
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                    15,923,000
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             467,354,000
<COMMON>                                    14,450,000
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                   46,841,000
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                        131,884,000
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>             193,175,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                       164,691,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             143,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                1,534,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>             107,811,000
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>              467,354,000
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                  162,588,000
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                        13,578,000
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 108,283,000
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 121,861,000
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                     40,727,000
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                           3,467,000
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>              44,194,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    13,942,000
<NET-INCOME>                                30,252,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>               30,252,000
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    19,930,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                   13,583,000
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                      55,397,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.10
        

</TABLE>
#### Harold Dennis OXFORD, Appellant, v. The CITY OF TULSA, Appellee.

No. M-78-582.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Dec. 10, 1979.

*142R. W. “Bud” Byars, Ted R. Fisher, Tulsa, for appellant.

Waldo F. Bales, City Atty. by Richard J. Kallsnick, Asst. City Atty., Tulsa, for appel-lee.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

Harold Dennis Oxford, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried and convicted in the Municipal Court of the City of Tulsa, Case No. 252263, for the offense of Petit Larceny. His punishment was set at a fine of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), and, from said judgment and sentence, an appeal has been perfected to this Court.

At trial, over the objection of defendant, the City was allowed to introduce evidence that some two and one-half weeks before the larceny for which defendant stood trial, defendant had removed a bottle of perfume and two greeting cards from the store.

On appeal, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of separate and distinct offenses. We agree. The evidence of other offenses was admitted here to show intent and common scheme or design.

Here, however, as in *Atnip v. State,*Okl.Cr., 564 P.2d 660 (1977), there was no connecting relationship and there was a substantial lapse of time between the other offenses and the offense for which defendant was on trial.

Accordingly, this case must be REVERSED and REMANDED for a new trial.

CORNISH, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.