alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004094EN.01003002.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/30

---

Action brought on 1 March 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the French Republic

(Case C-104/04)

(2004/C 94/68)

An action against the French Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 1 March 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by J.-F. Pasquier and M. Shotter, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Article 3(2) and Article 8(1) of Directive 97/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 April 1997 in conjunction with the Annex thereto (1), the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Article 3(2) and Article 8(1) of Directive 97/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 April 1997 in conjunction with the Annex thereto (1), the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The amendments made to the French Code des postes et télécommunications (Post and Telecommunications Code) do not put an end to the ground for complaint relating to the inconsistency of the obligatory contribution to research and development with the requirements of the directive. The Code requires the operators concerned to contribute to telecommunications research and development in the European Community in the sum of a minimum annual amount equal to 5 % of their investment. However that obligation is not included in the exhaustive list of the conditions which may be attached to licences and does not fall within any of the categories of conditions set out in the Annex to the directive.

---

(1)  Directive 97/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 April 1997 on a common framework for general authorisations and individual licences in the field of telecommunications services (OJ L 117 of 7.5.1997, p. 15).

1

---
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 99 

Expressing support for the designation of October 28, 2020, as ‘‘Honoring 

the Nation’s First Responders Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2020 

Ms. DELAURO (for herself and Mr. KING of New York) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of October 28, 2020, 

as ‘‘Honoring the Nation’s First Responders Day’’. 

Whereas, in the United States, first responders include professional and volunteer firefighters, police officers, emergency medical technicians, and paramedics; 

Whereas, according to a 2017 compilation of data on the 

Emergency Services Sector in the United States by the 

Department of Homeland Security, ‘‘The first responder 

community comprises an estimated 4.6 million career and 

volunteer professionals within five primary disciplines: 

Law Enforcement, Fire and Rescue Services, Emergency 

Medical Services, Emergency Management, and Public 

Works.’’; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 99 IH 

Whereas first responders deserve to be recognized for their 

commitment to safety, defense, and honor; 

Whereas the people of the United States have depended on 

the service and sacrifices of first responders during the 

national emergency relating to the Coronavirus disease 

2019 (COVID–19) pandemic; and 

Whereas October 28, 2020, would be an appropriate day to 

establish as ‘‘Honoring the Nation’s First Responders 

Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Honoring the 

4 Nation’s First Responders Day’’; 

5 (2) honors and recognizes the contributions of 

6 first responders; and 

7 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

8 to observe Honoring the Nation’s First Responders 

9 Day with appropriate ceremonies and activities that 

10 promote awareness of the contributions of first re11 sponders in the United States. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
----- Forwarded by Deke Abbott/AWA/FAA on 01/16/2014 02:08 PM

-----

From: "Shah, Shefali" <SShah@erahelicopters.com>

AFS

- 220, Air Carrier Operations

To: Deke Abbott/AWA/FAA@FAA,

Date: 01/15/2014 08:29 PM

Subject: Era Helicopters, LLC Petition for Exemption, Docket No. FAA 2011

- 1084

**BY ELECTRONIC MAIL**

Deke Abbott

Manager AFS

- 220, Air Carrier Operations

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Ave., SW, Room 830

Washington DC 20591

Dear Mr. Abbott:

I write to confirm that, in connect ion with its petition for exemption from SFAR 77, Docket

No. FAA 2011

- 1084, Era Helicopters, LLC is not requesting any area restrictions as

discussed on our telephone conversation of earlier today. Should you wish to discuss any

further comments or questi ons with respect to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact

me at ((917

- 891

- 1324), sshah@eragroupinc.com ).

Regards,

Shefali



### Shefali A. Shah

Acting General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

**Era Group Inc.** 

CityCentre Two

818 Town & Country Blvd, Ste 200

Houston, TX 77024

- 4564

O: 281

- 606

- 4884

M: 917

- 891

- 1324

sshah@eragroupinc.com
Abatement Order filed April 9, 2015. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00061-CV_

B. MAHLER INTERESTS, LP, Appellant

V.

DMAC CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-64035

ABATEMENT ORDER

On January 14, 2015, appellant filed a notice of appeal from a judgment 

signed October 17, 2014. The clerk’s record has not been filed. On February 25, 

2015, the Harris County District Clerk’s office notified this court that it had not 

received payment for preparation of the record. In response to this court’s notice 

that the appeal was subject to dismissal unless appellant provided the court with 

proof of payment for the record, appellant advised this court that the trial court’s 

judgment is not final because its counterclaim has not been resolved. Appellant 

asserts that its notice of appeal was filed prematurely in an abundance of caution 

and requests that we abate the appeal until the trial court disposes of the 

counterclaim.
The Texas Supreme Court has advised that if an appellate court is uncertain 

about the intent of an order to finally dispose of all claims and parties, it can abate 

the appeal to permit clarification by the trial court. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 

39 S.W.3d 191, 206 (Tex. 2001). Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 27.2 provides 

as follows:

The appellate court may allow an appealed order that is not final to be 

modified so as to be made final and may allow the modified order and 

all proceedings relating to it to be included in a supplemental record.

Tex. R. App. P. 27.2. 

Accordingly, we order the case abated and remanded to the trial court for a 

period of thirty days so that the trial court may clarify whether the summary 

judgment is final and to permit the parties to obtain an order disposing of the 

counterclaim, if necessary. A supplemental clerk=s record containing the trial 

court’s clarifying order and any findings regarding finality of the summary 

judgment shall be filed with the clerk of this court on or before May 8, 2015. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 27.3.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the 

supplemental clerk’s record is filed in this court. The court also will consider an 

appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may 

reinstate the appeal on its own motion. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 76 (Thursday, April 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9402]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLAZG02000.L143000000.EQ0000.TAS:14X1109.241A]


Notice of Relocation of the Bureau of Land Management's Tucson 
Field Office in Tucson, AZ

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of relocation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the relocation of the Bureau of Land 
Management's (BLM) Tucson Field Office (TFO) and the temporary closure 
of the office during the relocation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian B. Bellew, Field Manager, BLM 
Tucson Field Office, 12661 East Broadway, Tucson, Arizona 85748, 520-
258-7200. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf 
(TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-
877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal business hours. 
The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message 
or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during 
normal business hours.

DATES: Effective April 13, 2012, the relocation begins, and the new 
office opens Monday, April 16, 2012.

ADDRESSES: The new BLM Tucson Field Office address will be 3201 East 
Universal Way, Tucson, Arizona 85756.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective at the close of business on April 
12, 2012, the BLM TFO will close for the purpose of relocating. The 
Field Office provides access to and inspection of the official Public 
Records of the Federal government, and the serialized case files of 
active land, mineral, and grazing transactions for the TFO area. The 
office will reopen at its new address at 3201 East Universal Way, 
Tucson, Arizona 85756, at 8 a.m. on Monday, April 16, 2012. The BLM TFO 
telephone number will remain the same (520-258-7200). Directions to the 
new BLM TFO office: From I-10 and Valencia Road Exit <greek-i>267, go 
west 2.1 miles, then turn left onto South Lisa Frank Avenue, and 
continue approximately 0.1 mile to East Universal Way, then turn right 
and proceed 0.1 mile to the new address.

Raymond Suazo,
State Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-9402 Filed 4-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4130-32-P
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1118. HILL v. AMERICA’S WHOLESALE LENDER et al.

This Court docketed the present case on February 18, 2015. As a result,

Appellant Janet Hill was required to file an appellant’s brief and enumerations of

error in this Court not later than March 10, 2015. See OCGA § 5-6-40; Court of

Appeals Rules 22 (a), 23 (a). No such filings have been made as of the date of this

order, nor has any extension of time been requested or granted. Accordingly, it is

hereby ORDERED that this appeal is hereby DISMISSED. See Rules 13, 23 (a). 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/30/2015

March 30, 2015
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 12 (Thursday, January 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-917]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLES956000 L14200000.BK0000]


Eastern States: Filing of Plats of Survey; Alabama and Minnesota

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plats of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States office in 
Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in 
the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management-Eastern 
States, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: 
Dominica Van Koten. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the 
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-
(800) 877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal business 
hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a 
message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply 
during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: These surveys were requested by the Bureau 
of Indian Affairs.
    The lands surveyed are:

St. Stephens Meridian, Alabama

T. 2 N., R. 6 E.

    The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the subdivisional lines and the survey of Tract No. 10, 
land held in trust for the Poarch Band of Creek Indians, in Sections 
29 and 29, in Township 2 North, Range 6 East, of the St. Stephens 
Meridian, in the State of Alabama, and was accepted December 20, 
2011.

Fourth Principal Meridian, Minnesota

T. 144 N., R 38 W.

    The plat of survey represents the corrective dependent resurvey 
of a portion of the West boundary and the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the East and South boundaries and a portion of the 
subdivisional lines and the survey of the subdivision of Sections 
21, 25, 28, 30, 31, 33, and 36, in Township 144 North, Range 38 
West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, in the State of Minnesota, 
and was accepted December 20, 2011.

    We will place copies of the plats we described in the open files. 
They will be available to the public as a matter of information.
    If BLM receives a protest against a survey, as shown on the plat, 
prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing 
pending our consideration of the protest.
    We will not officially file the plats until the day after we have 
accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, 
including decisions on appeals.

    Dated: January 10, 2012.
Dominica Van Koten,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 2012-917 Filed 1-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6031

WILLIAM S. PARKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DAVID VENABLE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, 

Chief District Judge. (5:12-ct-03107-D)

Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: May 28, 2013

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William S. Parker, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William S. Parker appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that 

this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Parker v. 

Venable, No. 5:12-ct-03107-D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 2012). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wise Metals Group LLC (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Danny Mendelson, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 15, 2006



|    |  |                                                                
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Danny Mendelson                                            
|    |  | Danny Mendelson                                                
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

I, Russell C. Taylor, President and Chief Executive Officer of CelluTissue Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the period ended August 26, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in such Quarterly  Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | November 12,  2004   |   | /s/ Russell  C. Taylor |   |
|--------|----------------------|--------|------------------------|--------|
|   | Russell C.  Taylor   |
|   | President  and Chief |
|   | Executive  Officer   |

 

----
Exhibit
10.15


 


SECOND
AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT


 


THIS
SECOND AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT made this 29th day of October 2018.


 


TEXAS
MEDICAL CENTER (“Licensor”), and BIOLIFE4D INC., a Delaware C-Corporation (“Licensee”) are parties
to a certain License Agreement (“License”) dated April 3, 2018 with respect to premises identified as Lab Bench J-251-P and
J-251-Q located at 2450 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77021-2040.


 


	 	A.	The
Licensee wishes to modify their footprint in JLABS @ TMC and Licensor has agreed to accommodate this request.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, which is incorporated herein by reference, for mutual promises contained herein, and for
other good and valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Licensor and Licensee hereby agree
as follows:


 


	 	I.	Effective
November 1st, 2018, Licensee shall no longer have access to Lab Bench J-251-P and J- 251-Q.
	 	 	 
	 	2.	Effective
    November 1st, 2018, Licensee shall have access to Lab J-307.
	 	 	 
	 	3.	Section
    2.1 of the License shall be amended to reflect an increase in the License Fee in the amount of $2,000.00 for a total License Fee
    in the amount of $4,000.00 per month.
	 	 	 
	 	4.	Section
    2.5 of the License shall be amended to reflect that on or before the Effective Date, Licensee shall deposit with licensor the additional
    amount of $4,000 for a total Security Deposit of $8,000.00.
	 	 	 
	 	5.	Except
    as amended by this 2nd Amendment, all other terms of the License shall remain in full force and effect.


 


(signatures
on the following page)


 




    	 



     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Licensor and Licensee have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this 2nd Amendment as
of the date first written.


 


	 	LICENSOR:
	 	 
	 	TEXAS
    MEDICAL CENTER
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
William F. McKeon
	 	Name:	William
F. McKeon
	 	Title:	President
and CEO
	 	 	 
	 	LICENSEE:
	 	 
	 	BIOLIFE4D
    INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
Steven Morris 
	 	Name:
    	Steven
    Morris
	 	Title:
    	CEO
&2,8r7-oi

Lourj^J^tn^Mff^k

MelAosk^Cleck . •" J?5CBVmfft#

BusriotJexos—782LL

l€0SMjC/jlf/f

MorcLSOjOIS

&jJ^jOf£mj^rJfiJkJOkJ^£aj2.

_v

tiendecsao.boyleS

_Dwr^£3t:Aco5m~>

_decUicnonjr\\fJCoset

dbo'Lujiof^Jhc-beCQm

m2l.US72jysXS^±^2M6)^ - —- —

-Offte&Qj

ly^ydurst

^pjz>

wfeck£UDMecto.tJMi&

JlOC7Mo,J!)J25233A

MarmMles-LlaLt
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 45 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 45

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2019, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2019

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Meadows, Mr. Jordan, Mr. Davidson of Ohio, 
Mr. Perry, Mr. Hice of Georgia, Mr. Harris, Mr. Roy, Mr. Gosar, and Mr. 
Green of Tennessee) submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2019, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2019 (division C of Public Law 115-245) is further 
amended by striking the date specified in section 105(3) and inserting 
``February 22, 2019''.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1385. JGD PROPERTIES, LLC. v. FRANK ZARCONE.

On September 10, 2014, the trial court denied JGD Properties, LLC’s motion

for summary judgment. JGD Properties filed a motion for reconsideration, and the

trial court denied that motion on November 13, 2014. JGD Properties then filed a

notice of appeal from both court orders on December 2, 2014. We lack jurisdiction.

First, the denial of a motion for reconsideration is not directly appealable and

does not extend the time for appealing the underlying judgment. See Bell v. Cohran,

244 Ga. App. 510, 511 (536 SE2d 187) (2000). Further, an order denying a motion

for summary judgment is an interlocutory order, not a final judgment. Sharpe’s

Appliance Store, Inc. v. Anderson, 161 Ga. App. 112 (289 SE2d 312) (1982).

Therefore, to appealsuch an order, a party must comply with the interlocutory appeal

procedure of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). For these reasons, this appeal is DISMISSED for

lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/02/2015

April 02, 2015