alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 06-14-00223-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

TEXARKANA, TEXAS 

DALE DEWAYNE FISHER APPELLANT 

VS

STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE 

 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF OF APPELLANT 

TO HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

 NOW COMES, the Appellant by and through his Attorney, Tim Cone, and does 

hereby move this Honorable Court to grant an extension of time for the purpose of filing 

the Appellant’s Brief.

I.

 Judgment was entered with the 115th District Court of Upshur County, Texas, in 

Cause Number 16,741 styled The State of Texas vs. Dale Dewayne Fisher, on the 12th

day of November, 2014. The Appellant’s brief is due on April 15, 2015. This is the 

Appellant’s second request for an extension of time for the late filing of Appellant’s 

brief. 

ACCEPTED

06-14-00223-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

4/9/2015 10:30:00 AM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 4/9/2015 10:30:00 AM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
That the Appellant hereby requests an extension of time to file Appellant’s brief 

until May 15, 2015, and will hopefully be the last extension we will ask for and as 

reason therefore, would show the court as follows: Appellant’s attorney has recently 

submitted a brief in Cory Martin Colvin v. State, Case Number 06-14-00163-CR to the 

Sixth Court of Appeals. Further, Appellant’s attorney was preparing for jury trials in 

the 115th District Court for the two week session beginning April 13, 2015: State v. 

Carlos Bunch, Jr., Cause Number 12503; State v. Alton Ray Easley, Jr., Cause Numbers 

16346,16499 and 16647;State v. David Bruce Williams, Cause Number 16580; State v. 

Mary Ellen Clark, Cause Number 16723; State v. Christopher Alan Ray, Cause Number 

16,784; State v. Kelly Wayne Haney, Cause number 16,881; State v. Stefoni Elyse 

Knox, Cause Number 16,854;State v. Jerry Dean Becht, Cause Number 16,907; and 

State v. Lester Shane Browning, Cause Number 16,875. Further, Appellant’s attorney 

has recently submitted a brief in State v. Roderick King, Case Number 06-14-00166-

CR. Lastly, Appellant’s attorney is in the process of moving his office and home to 

another location for the hopefully short time (4-5 months) until he is able to retire. The

move will be completed by April 17, 2015, and the sale of the office/home will be 

completed on May 1, 2015.

. 
. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the undersigned counsel 

respectfully prays that the Honorable Court of Appeals extend the time for the filing of 

Appellant’s Brief in this cause to the 15th day of May, 2015.

 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/Tim Cone

______________________________

Tim Cone, Attorney At Law

State Bar N. 04660350

P.O. Box 413

Gilmer, Texas 75644

903-725-6270

 e-mail: timcone6@aol.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has been served to Natalie 

Miller, Assistant Criminal District Attorney for Upshur County, attorney for Appellee,

on this the 9th day of April, 2015.

/s/Tim Cone

 _____________________________

 Tim Cone, Attorney At Law
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

-- -- -- --

NO. 14-0326

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS

TRUSTEE FOR OPTION ONE

MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2006-1

ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES,

SERIES 2006-1

v.

LONZIE LEATH

§

§

§

§

§

§

Dallas County,

5th District.

February 27, 2015

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

(Justice Phil Johnson not sitting)



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR

OPTION ONE MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2006-1 ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES,

SERIES 2006-1, pay all costs incurred on this petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 9th day of April, 2015.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-80,307-01

EX PARTE ANTHONY LEE JOHNSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 41097-B IN THE 124 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM GREGG COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of driving while

intoxicated and sentenced to sixteen years’ imprisonment. 

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he did

not file a timely notice of appeal. We remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact

and conclusions of law.

The trial court has determined that appellate counsel's performance was deficient and that

counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. We find that Applicant is entitled to the
2

opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 41097-B from

the 124 District Court of Gregg County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may th

give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful

appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether

Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court

shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall

be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court

issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps

to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court

issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department ofCriminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: March 12, 2014

Do not publish
391 A.2d 705

#### Commonwealth v. Young, Appellant.

Submitted April 10, 1978.

Benjamin Spencer Blakley, III, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Barbara H. Schickling, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

*643HOFFMAN, J.,

dissented based on *Commonwealth v. Riggins,*474 Pa. 115, 377 A.2d 140 (1977), and *Commonwealth v. Wertz,*252 Pa.Super. 584, 384 A.2d 933 (1978).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund XI, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2008                            
|                                              
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                        
|Paritosh K. Choksi                            
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  
|Officer and Chief Operating Officer of        
|ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| (3)   | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (4)   | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                        |   |                                                           |
|-----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:      August 14, 2008 | By:    | /s/      Randy Lay                                             |
|                        |   | Chief      Financial Officer(Principal      Financial Officer) |
S erved: September 17 , 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

------------------------------------------------------------ 

### CHARTER AIR TRANSPORT , INC.

------------------------------------------------------------



### NOT ICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME

On September 11, 2014

, Charter Air Transport , Inc. (“ CAT ”) , a U.S. commuter air carrier

, 1 requested

that the Department register the trade name “ Via Airlines ” for use in certain of its air transportation

operations.

Pa rt 215 of the Department’s regulations (14 CFR Part 215) provides that any air carrier wishing to use

an alternative trade name must first register that name with the Department. The rule further states that

the Department may register such name after the air carrier gives notification to similarly named air

carriers of the proposed use of the name

. Our review has revealed no similarly named air carriers.

Since CAT has complied with the requirements of Part 215, we acknowledge the registration of the tr ade

name “ Via Airlines” for immediate use in their operations.

Dated at Washington, D.C.

, September 17 , 2014

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysi s

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at

http://www.regulations.gov

1 See Order 2011

- 4

- 11, issued on April 8, 2011.Attachment

SERVICE LIST FOR CHARTER AIR TRANSPORT , INC.

AMOS VIZER

PRESIDENT

CHARTER AIR TRANSPOR T INC

218 JACKSON STREET

MAITLAND FL 32751 JASON E MADDUX

GAROFALO GOER LICH HAINBACH PC

COUNSEL FOR CHARTER AIR TRANSPORT

1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NW

SUITE 590

WASHINGTON DC 20036

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590 PETER LYNCH

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL

FOR ENFOR CEMENT AGC

- 300

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591

MARK MAZOR

CERTIFICATION SECTION MANAGER

FAA AFS

- 900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166 JAMES A STENHOUSE

POI FOR CHARTER AIR TRANSPORT

FAA ORLANDO FISDO

5950 HAZELTINE NATIONAL D RIVE

SUITE 500

ORLANDO AFL 32822
## **Exhibit 31.1**

**Section302 Certification**

I, Brian Hansberry, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SenecaGaming Corporation;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)           Discussed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)           Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: May 15, 2007 | /s/ E. Brian  Hansberry                        |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|               | Brian Hansberry                                |
|               | Interim President and Chief Executive  Officer |
|               | (Principal Executive Officer)                  |

 

----
# C_2004094EN.01003402.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/34

---

Removal from the register of Case C-54/02 (1)

1

(2004/C 94/82)

By order of 10 December 2003 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case C-54/02: Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 97 of 20.04.2002.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1854

DWIGHT BISHOP, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BOARD OF EDUCATION FOR CALVERT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District 

Judge. (8:11-cv-01100-DKC)

Submitted: February 2, 2012 Decided: February 16, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joyce E. Smithey, RIFKIN, LIVINGSTON, LEVITAN & SILVER, LLC, 

Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellant. Edmund J. O’Meally, Andrew 

G. Scott, Lisa Y. Settles, HODES, PESSIN, & KATZ, PA, Towson, 

Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dwight Bishop, Jr., appeals the district court’s 

dismissal of his complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Bishop v. Bd. of Educ. for Calvert Cnty. Pub. Schs., No. 

8:11-cv-01100-DKC (D. Md. July 5, 2011). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.25


 


	CERTAIN
    IDENTIFIED INFORMATION HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THIS EXHIBIT BECAUSE IT IS BOTH NOT MATERIAL AND IS THE TYPE THAT THE REGISTRANT TREATS
    AS PRIVATE OR CONFIDENTIAL.








 


APPROVED FOR PUBLIC

RELEASE, DISTRIBUTION

UNLIMITED
# HRCVTEMP_UNS
```

Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Howard Katz, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MDwerks, Inc.

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting;

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

                                                   /s/ Howard Katz
                                                   ---------------

Dated: May 15, 2006
```
# C_2004115EN.01002701.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/27

---

NOTICE TO IMPORTERS

NOTICE TO IMPORTERS

(2004/C 115/13)

Preferential imports of canned tuna fish from Turkey

By a notice to importers published in the Official Journal of the European Communities C 366 of 20.12.2000, p. 16, the Commission informed operators that there were reasonable doubts concerning the proper application of the preferential treatment enjoyed by Turkey and the applicability of the evidence of origin presented in the European Community for tuna products under tariff heading 16.04 coming from Turkey. The reasonable doubt stemmed from the surveillance operations carried out and the finding by the Commission that administrative cooperation between the Turkish and Community authorities were not applied properly.

Official Journal of the European Communities

The rules of origin and related methods of administrative co-operation are laid down in Protocol 3 of Decision 1/98 of the EC-Turkey Association Council on trade regime for agricultural products. Turkey has recently introduced changes in its national legislation and operational practices, in order to comply with these provisions. In addition, the Turkish competent authorities have committed themselves to ensure an adequate monitoring of their functioning and to perform the necessary controls.

The conditions for a proper functioning of the administrative co-operation in that field having thus been restored, the notice to importers concerning tuna imports from Turkey, of 20 December 2000, is withdrawn.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2176

ROY WALTER KRIEGER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; 

LOUDOUN COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES; WARREN COUNTY 

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; JENNIFER DOYLE,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

LOUDOUN COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, 

District Judge. (5:13-cv-00073-MFU-JGW)

Submitted: March 27, 2015 Decided: April 9, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy Walter Krieger, Appellant Pro Se. Mikie F. Melis, OFFICE OF 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Heather
2

Kathleen Bardot, BANCROFT, MCGAVIN, HORVATH & JUDKINS, PC, 

Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Roy Walter Krieger appeals the district court’s order 

accepting in part and rejecting in part the magistrate judge’s 

recommendation and dismissing Krieger’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) 

complaint with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Krieger v. Commonwealth of Va., 

Dep’t of Soc. Servs., No. 5:13-cv-00073-MFU-JGW (W.D. Va. Sept. 

30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
#### Joseph L. Markham, Plaintiff in Error. v. The Commercial Bank, a Corporation Organized and Existing Under the Laws of Florida, Defendant in Error.

(Supreme Court of Florida, Division B,

May 9, 1905.)

Writ of. Error .to Circuit Court. Duval county; Rhydon M. Call, Judge.

*Geo. LJ. Walker,*for Plaintiff in Error-.

*B. E. Liggett,*for Defendant in Error.

*404Per Curiam.

This action was brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error. There was judgment for the defendant and the plaintiff takes writ of error. The judgment is affirmed.

Decision