U.S. EPA Data Request 

Emissions Test Report 

Prepared for: 

Johns Manville 

Defiance Complex 

925 Carpenter Road (Plant 8) 

Defiance, Ohio 43512 

Project No. 11-4191.01 

February 22, 2012 

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 

4949 Fernlee Avenue 

Royal Oak, Michigan 48073 

(248) 548-8070 
Johns ManvilleDefiance BTEC Project No. 11-4191.01 

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 

i

Executive Summary

For the purpose of assisting in the development of any emission standard under Section 7412 of 

the Clean Air Act (CAA), Section 114 of the CAA gives the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) authority to require that persons who operate any emission source 

“sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at 

such intervals, during such periods and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe)”. 

Consistent with this authority, U.S. EPA has required that Johns Manville (JM) sample emissions 

for the purpose of providing residual risk-related data for the National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing1. 

To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was 

retained by JM to evaluate emission rates of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack 

associated with the Line 89 Melter Dust Collector located at the Johns Manville Complex in 

Defiance, Ohio: 

• Filterable particulate matter (PM) using U.S. EPA Methods 5/29 

• Filterable chromium (FCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29 

• Vaporous chromium (VCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29 

• Total chromium (TCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29 

• Hexavalent chromium (Cr+6) using SW-846 Method 0061 

• TCr using SW-846 Method 0061 

Table I on the following page summarizes the overall results of the emissions test program. 

 

1

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Johns ManvilleDefiance BTEC Project No. 11-4191.01 

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 

ii

Table I 

Overall Emissions Test Results Summary 

Line 89 Melter Dust Collector 

Test Dates: December 7 and 8, 2011 

Test Methods Pollutant MDL 

used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour) 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm) 

USEPA 

Method 5/29 Filterable PM < 3.6 x 10-2 4.2 x 10-1

Filterable Chromium 

(FCr) 6.9 x 10-5 8.2 x 10-4

Vaporous Chromium 

(VCr) 6.6 x 10-6 7.8 x 10-5

USEPA 

Method 29 

Total Chromium (TCr) 7.6 x 10-5 9.0 x 10-4

Hexavalent Chromium 

(Cr+6) < 4.4 x 10-6 5.3 x 10-5 USEPA 

Method 0061 Total Chromium (TCr) < 9.3 x 10-5 1.1 x 10-3

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 
Johns ManvilleDefiance BTEC Project No. 11-4191.01 

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 2

2.1 PROCESS MONITORING ....................................................................................................... 2

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES.............................................. 2

3.1 EXHAUST GAS VELOCITY, MOLECULAR WEIGHT, AND MOISTURE CONTENT .................... 2

3.2 PM, FCR, VCR, AND TCR CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES ................................. 3

3.3 CR+6 AND TCR CONCENTRATIONS AND EMISSION RATES................................................... 4

4.0 TEST RESULTS ................................................................................................................. 4

TABLES

Table 1 – Test Personnel 

Table 2 – Overall Emission Test Results Summary 

Table 3 – Line 89 Melter Dust Collector Method 5/29 Emission Rate Results Summary 

Table 3 – Line 89 Melter Dust Collector Method 0061 Emission Rate Results Summary 

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Line 89 Melter Dust Collector (Stack 8901) Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Diagram 

Figure 2 – Method 3A Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 3 – Method 5/29 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

Figure 4 – Method 0061 Sampling Train Schematic Drawing 

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Field and Computer Generated Raw Data and Field Notes 

Appendix B – Process Data 

Appendix C – Equipment Calibration Documents 

Appendix D – Laboratory Analytical Reports 
Johns Manville Defiance BTEC Project No. 11-4191.01 

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 

1

1.0 Introduction 

For the purpose of assisting in the development of any emission standard under Section 7412 of 

the Clean Air Act (CAA), Section 114 of the CAA gives the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) authority to require that persons who operate any emission source 

“sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at 

such intervals, during such periods and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe)”. 

Consistent with this authority, U.S. EPA has required that Johns Manville (JM) sample emissions 

for the purpose of providing residual risk-related data for the National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing2. 

To assist in collecting the agreed upon data, BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. (BTEC) was 

retained by JM to evaluate emission rates of the following pollutants from one exhaust stack 

associated with the Line 89 Melter Dust Collector located at the Johns Manville (Johns Manville) 

Complex in Defiance, Ohio: 

• Filterable particulate matter (PM) using U.S. EPA Methods 5/29 

• Filterable chromium (FCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29 

• Vaporous chromium (VCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29 

• Total chromium (TCr) using U.S. EPA Method 29 

• Hexavalent chromium (Cr+6) using SW-846 Method 0061 

• TCr using SW-846 Method 0061 

The emissions test program was conducted on December 7 and 8, 2011. The test program 

consisted of triplicate 240-minute emission tests for each parameter. The field sampling portion 

of the emissions test program included the personnel summarized by Table 1.

Table 1 

Emissions Test Program Personnel

Personnel Affiliation 

Barry Boulianne BTEC 

James Sharp BTEC 

Matthew Young BTEC 

Paul Draper BTEC 

Paul Molenda BTEC 

Jim Smargiassi 

Adam Vega 

Johns Manville 

Johns Manville 

 

2

 Codified at 40 CFR 63, Subpart NNN 
Johns Manville Defiance BTEC Project No. 11-4191.01 

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 

2

2.0 Process Description

The Line 89 electric melter charges batch and cullet and feeds to a natural forehearth which 

distributes the glass to a series of fiberizing rotary discs which attenuate the fibers onto a 

collection mat. The collected mat enters a curing oven to thermally set the binder and then enters 

a cooling table prior to being cut and packaged. 

A schematic drawing showing traverse point locations for the stack evaluated is available as 

Figure 1. 

2.1 Process Monitoring 

Process and control equipment data collected during the emissions test program, as well as the 

frequency of data collection, includes the following: 

(1) Glass Pull Rate (tons/hr), 15-min 

(2) Baghouse Pressure Drop, 15-min 

Process production data is available in Appendix B. Control equipment data will be available to 

U.S. EPA on request. 

3.0 Sampling and Analytical Methodologies 

Sampling and analytical methodologies for the emissions test program can be separated into 

three categories as follows: 

(1) Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content; 

(2) Measurement of exhaust gas PM, FCr, VCr, and TCr concentrations and emission rates 

using Methods 5/29; and 

(3) Measurement of exhaust gas CR+6 and TCr concentrations and emission rates using 

Method 0061. 

Descriptions of sampling and analytical methodologies by category are summarized by Sections 

3.1 through 3.3, respectively. 

3.1 Exhaust Gas Velocity, Molecular Weight, and Moisture Content 

Measurement of exhaust gas velocity, molecular weight, and moisture content were conducted 

using the following reference test methods codified at Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A of the Code 

of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 60, Appendix A): 

• Method 1 - “Location of the Sampling Site and Sampling Points” 

• Method 2 - “Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flowrate” 

• Method 3A - “Determination of Molecular Weight of Dry Stack 

Gas”(Integrated tedlar bags)

• Method 4 - “Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases”
Johns Manville Defiance BTEC Project No. 11-4191.01 

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 

3

These test methods were used to evaluate exhaust gas flowrates in conjunction with the 

isokinetic sampling methodologies. 

Stack gas velocity traverses were conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in 

Method 1 and Method 2 (see Figure 1 for a traverse location drawing). An S-type pitot tube with 

a thermocouple assembly, calibrated in accordance with Method 2, Section 4.1.1, was used to 

measure exhaust gas velocity pressures (using a manometer) and temperatures at each location 

during testing. The S-type pitot tube dimensions was within specified limits, therefore, a 

baseline pitot tube coefficient of 0.84 (dimensionless) was assigned. 

Molecular weight was determined according to USEPA Method 3A, “Determination of Oxygen 

and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in Emissions from Stationary Sources”. The O2 content of 

the exhaust gas was measured using an M&C Products PMA 100-L O2 gas analyzer and the CO2

content of the exhaust gas was measured using a California Analytical Instruments (CAI) 600 

Series CO2 gas analyzer. A sample of the gas stream was drawn through an insulated stainlesssteel probe into an integrated tedlar bag by the use of a vacuum sample lung. The sample was 

then connected to sample conditioner to remove the moisture from the sample before it entered 

the analyzers. Data was recorded at 4-second intervals on a PC equipped with data acquisition 

software. 

 

For O2 and CO2 analyzer calibrations, calibration gases were mixed to desired concentrations 

using an Environics Series 4040 Computerized Gas Dilution System. The Series 4040 consists 

of a single chassis with four mass flow controllers. The mass flow controllers are factorycalibrated using a primary flow standard traceable to the United State's National Institute of 

Standards and Technology (NIST). Each flow controller utilizes an 11-point calibration table 

with linear interpolation, to increase accuracy and reduce flow controller nonlinearity. 

Exhaust gas moisture content was evaluated using Method 4. Exhaust gas moisture content was 

determined gravimetrically. 

3.2 PM, FCr, VCr, and TCr Concentrations and Emission Rates

PM, FCr, VCr, and TCr concentrations and emission rates were measured using the procedures 

of 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Methods 5 and 29. Selected metals concentrations and emission 

rates were measured using BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling 

system. This system consisted of (1) a borosilicate glass or quartz nozzle, (2) a steel probe 

w/glass liner, (3) a heated quartz fiber filter assembly, (4) a set of four GS impingers, (5) a 

length of sample line, and (6) a Nutech® control case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and 

calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first two impingers were filled with 100 ml of a 5% 

nitric acid (HNO3)/10% hydrogen peroxide solution, the third impinger was empty, and the 

fourth contained approximately 300 g of silica gel desiccant. A schematic drawing of the 

PM/metals sampling train is provided as Figure 3. 
Johns Manville Defiance BTEC Project No. 11-4191.01 

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 

4

3.3 Cr+6 and TCr Concentrations and Emission Rates 

Measurement of Cr+6 and TCr concentrations and emission rates were measured using the 

procedures Method 0061. Cr+6 and TCr concentrations and emission rates were measured using 

BTEC’s Nutech® Model 2010 modular isokinetic stack sampling system. This system consisted 

of (1) a glass nozzle, (2) a heated steel probe with a glass probe liner, (4) a Teflon tee with a 

recirculating pump, (5) five GS impingers, (6) a length of sample line, and (7) a Nutech® control 

case equipped with a pump, dry gas meter, and calibrated orifice. Prior to each test, the first 

impinger was filled with 150 mL of 0.1N KOH, the next two were filled with 75 mL of 0.1 N 

KOH, the fourth was empty, and the last impinger contained approximately 300 g of silica gel 

desiccant. A schematic drawing of the Method 0061 sampling train is provided as Figure 4. 

4.0 Test Results 

The overall results of the emissions test program are summarized by Table 2. 

Table 2 

Overall Emissions Test Results Summary 

Line 89 Melter Dust Collector 

Test Methods Pollutant MDL 

used 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/hour) 

Emission 

Rate 

(lbs/ton) 

Emission 

Rate 

(mg/dscm) 

USEPA 

Method 5/29 Filterable PM < 3.6 x 10-2 4.2 x 10-1

Filterable Chromium 

(FCr) 6.9 x 10-5 8.2 x 10-4

Vaporous Chromium 

(VCr) 6.6 x 10-6 7.8 x 10-5

USEPA 

Method 29 

Total Chromium (TCr) 7.6 x 10-5 9.0 x 10-4

Hexavalent Chromium 

(Cr+6) < 4.4 x 10-6 5.3 x 10-5 USEPA 

Method 0061 Total Chromium (TCr) < 9.3 x 10-5 1.1 x 10-3

Notes: (1) Pollutant emission rates in terms of mg/dscm were not corrected to 7% O2 because exhaust from the 

process is essentially ambient (i.e., approximately 20.9% O2). 

(2) The “less than” symbol (<) included in the table indicates that the emission rate was calculated using the method 

detection limit (MDL) value instead of zero because the analytical result was below the MDL for one or more of the 

sample fractions. 

Detailed results for individual emission test runs are summarized in Table 3. Field and 

computer-generated data sheets are included in Appendix A. Process data associated with the 

emissions test program is provided in Appendix B. Equipment calibration documents are 

provided in Appendix C. Laboratory analytical results are available in Appendix D. 
Johns Manville Defiance BTEC Project No. 11-4191.01 

U.S. EPA Emissions Test Report February 22, 2012 

5

Limitations

The information and opinions rendered in this report are exclusively for use by Johns Manville. 

BTEC will not distribute or publish this report without Johns Manville’s consent except as 

required by law or court order. BTEC accepts responsibility for the competent performance of 

its duties in executing the assignment and preparing reports in accordance with the normal 

standards of the profession, but disclaims any responsibility for consequential damages. 

This report was prepared by: 

Brandon Chase 

Staff Environmental Engineer 

This report was reviewed by: 

Randal J. Tysar 

Senior Environmental Engineer 
Tables 
Table 3

Line 89 Melter Dust Collector Method 5/29 Emission Rate Results Summary

Company JM Defiance

Source Designation 89 melter dust collector

Test Date 12/7/2011 12/8/2011 12/8/2011

Meter/Nozzle Information P-1 P-2 P-3 Average

Meter Temperature Tm (F) 69.5 69.2 73.3 70.7

Meter Pressure - Pm (in. Hg) 30.2 30.4 30.4 30.3

Measured Sample Volume (Vm) 204.1 200.4 203.7 202.7

Sample Volume (Vm-Std ft3) 205.8 203.2 205.0 204.7

Sample Volume (Vm-Std m3) 5.83 5.75 5.80 5.80

Condensate Volume (Vw-std) 1.900 2.117 2.282 2.100

Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (wet) 0.0744 0.0743 0.0743 0.0743

Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (dry) 0.0746 0.0746 0.0746 0.0746

Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (wet) 15.44 15.25 15.40 15.36

Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (dry) 15.36 15.15 15.30 15.27

Nozzle Size - An (sq. ft.) 0.000392 0.000392 0.000392 0.000392

Isokinetic Variation - I 92.6 93.0 93.4 93.0

Production Data

Production Data (lb/hr)

Stack Data

Average Stack Temperature - Ts (F) 108.3 110.8 109.8 109.6

Molecular Weight Stack Gas- dry (Md) 28.9 28.8 28.9 28.9

Molecular Weight Stack Gas-wet (Ms) 28.8 28.7 28.8 28.8

Stack Gas Specific Gravity (Gs) 0.994 0.992 0.993 0.993

Percent Moisture (Bws) 0.91 1.03 1.10 1.02

Water Vapor Volume (fraction) 0.0091 0.0103 0.0110 0.0102

Pressure - Ps ("Hg) 30.0 30.2 30.2 30.1

Average Stack Velocity -Vs (ft/sec) 42.7 42.0 42.1 42.2

Area of Stack (ft2) 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6

Exhaust Gas Flowrate

Flowrate ft

3

(Actual) 24,608 24,213 24,289 24,370

Flowrate ft

3 (Standard Wet) 22,927 22,578 22,687 22,731

Flowrate ft

3 (Standard Dry) 22,717 22,345 22,438 22,500

Flowrate m3 (standard dry) 643 633 635 637

Total Particulate Weights (mg)

Acetone Rinse 3.6 1.5 1.3 2.1

Filter < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 0.3

Total < 3.9 < 1.8 < 1.6 2.4

Total Particulate Concentration

 lb/1000 lb (wet) < 5.6E-04 < 2.6E-04 < 2.3E-04 3.5E-04

 lb/1000 lb (dry) < 5.6E-04 < 2.6E-04 < 2.3E-04 3.5E-04

mg/dscm (dry) < 6.7E-01 < 3.1E-01 < 2.8E-01 4.2E-01

gr/dscf < 2.9E-04 < 1.4E-04 < 1.2E-04 1.8E-04

Total Particulate Emission Rate

 lb/ hr < 5.7E-02 < 2.6E-02 < 2.3E-02 3.6E-02

 lb/ ton product

Filterable Chromium Weights (ug)

Front Half Chromium (Filterable) 6.22 4.62 3.42 4.75

Filterable Chromium Concentrations

 lb/1000 lb (wet) 8.9E-07 6.7E-07 4.9E-07 6.8E-07

 lb/1000 lb (dry) 8.9E-07 6.7E-07 4.9E-07 6.9E-07

mg/dscm (dry) 1.1E-03 8.0E-04 5.9E-04 8.2E-04

gr/dscf 4.7E-07 3.5E-07 2.6E-07 3.6E-07

Filterable Chromium Emission Rate

 lb/ hr 9.1E-05 6.7E-05 5.0E-05 6.9E-05

 lb/ ton product

Vaporous Chromium Weights (ug)

Back Half Chromium (Vaporous) 0.40 0.68 0.27 0.45

Vaporous Chromium Concentrations

 lb/1000 lb (wet) 5.7E-08 9.8E-08 3.9E-08 6.5E-08

 lb/1000 lb (dry) 5.7E-08 9.9E-08 3.9E-08 6.5E-08

mg/dscm (dry) 6.9E-05 1.2E-04 4.7E-05 7.8E-05

gr/dscf 3.0E-08 5.2E-08 2.0E-08 3.4E-08

Vaporous Chromium Emission Rate

 lb/ hr 5.9E-06 9.9E-06 3.9E-06 6.6E-06

 lb/ ton product

Total Chromium Weights (ug)

Total Chromium 6.62 5.30 3.69 5.20

Total Chromium Concentrations

 lb/1000 lb (wet) 9.4E-07 7.7E-07 5.3E-07 7.5E-07

 lb/1000 lb (dry) 9.5E-07 7.7E-07 5.3E-07 7.5E-07

mg/dscm (dry) 1.1E-03 9.2E-04 6.4E-04 9.0E-04

gr/dscf 5.0E-07 4.0E-07 2.8E-07 3.9E-07

Total Chromium Emission Rate

 lb/ hr 9.7E-05 7.7E-05 5.4E-05 7.6E-05

 lb/ ton product
Table 4

Line 89 Melter Dust Collector Method 0061 Emission Rate Results Summary

Company JM Defiance

Source Designation 89 melter dust collector

Test Date 12/7/2011 12/8/2011 12/8/2011

Meter/Nozzle Information P-1 P-2 P-3 Average

Meter Temperature Tm (F) 73.3 72.3 77.2 74.3

Meter Pressure - Pm (in. Hg) 30.2 30.3 30.3 30.3

Measured Sample Volume (Vm) 209.2 195.3 196.6 200.4

Sample Volume (Vm-Std ft3) 209.8 197.0 196.5 201.1

Sample Volume (Vm-Std m3) 5.94 5.58 5.56 5.69

Condensate Volume (Vw-std) 1.919 2.122 2.037 2.026

Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (wet) 0.0744 0.0743 0.0743 0.0743

Gas Density (Ps(std) lbs/ft3) (dry) 0.0746 0.0746 0.0746 0.0746

Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (wet) 15.74 14.79 14.76 15.10

Total weight of sampled gas (m g lbs) (dry) 15.65 14.69 14.66 15.00

Nozzle Size - An (sq. ft.) 0.000366 0.000366 0.000366 0.000366

Isokinetic Variation - I 99.0 100.0 100.0 99.7

Production Data

Production Data (lb/hr)

Stack Data

Average Stack Temperature - Ts (F) 109.1 111.0 110.4 110.2

Oxygen Concentration (%) 20.6 21.1 21.0

Molecular Weight Stack Gas- dry (Md) 28.9 28.8 28.9 28.9

Molecular Weight Stack Gas-wet (Ms) 28.8 28.7 28.8 28.8

Stack Gas Specific Gravity (Gs) 0.994 0.992 0.993 0.993

Percent Moisture (Bws) 0.91 1.07 1.03 1.00

Water Vapor Volume (fraction) 0.0091 0.0107 0.0103 0.0100

Pressure - Ps ("Hg) 30.0 30.2 30.2 30.1

Average Stack Velocity -Vs (ft/sec) 43.6 40.5 40.4 41.5

Area of Stack (ft2) 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6

Exhaust Gas Flowrate

Flowrate ft3

(Actual) 25,171 23,394 23,290 23,952

Flowrate ft3 (Standard Wet) 23,416 21,808 21,732 22,319

Flowrate ft3 (Standard Dry) 23,204 21,576 21,509 22,096

Flowrate m3 (standard dry) 657 611 609 626

Total Hexavalent Chromium Weight (ug)

Hexavalent Chromium < 0.30 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.30

Total Hexavalent Chromium Concentration

 lb/1000 lb (wet) < 4.2E-08 < 4.5E-08 < 4.5E-08 4.4E-08

 lb/1000 lb (dry) < 4.2E-08 < 4.5E-08 < 4.5E-08 4.4E-08

mg/dscm (dry) < 5.1E-05 < 5.4E-05 < 5.4E-05 5.3E-05

Total Hexavalent Chromium Emission Rate

 lb/ hr < 4.4E-06 < 4.4E-06 < 4.4E-06 4.4E-06

 lb/ ton product

Total Chromium Weight (ug)

Back Half Chromium < 4.00 < 4.00 < 4.00 4.00

Front Half Chromium 0.50 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.37

Rinse Chromium < 2.00 < 2.00 < 2.00

Total Chromium < 6.50 < 6.30 < 6.30 6.37

Total Chromium Concentration

 lb/1000 lb (wet) < 9.1E-07 < 9.4E-07 < 9.4E-07 9.3E-07

 lb/1000 lb (dry) < 9.2E-07 < 9.5E-07 < 9.5E-07 9.4E-07

mg/dscm (dry) < 1.1E-03 < 1.1E-03 < 1.1E-03 1.1E-03

Total Chromium Emission Rate

 lb/ hr < 9.5E-05 < 9.2E-05 < 9.2E-05 9.3E-05

 lb/ ton product
Figures 
diameter = 42"

Points Distance "

12 0.9

11 2.8

10 5.0

9 7.4

8 10.5

7 15.0

6 27.0

5 31.5

4 34.6

3 37.0

2 39.2

1 41.1

Figure 1

Site: Sampling Dates:

Johns Manville December 7-8, 2011

Defiance, Ohio

Line 89 Melter

BT Environmental Consulting, 

Inc.

4949 Fernlee Avenue

Royal Oak, Michigan

Not to Scale 

 

<0.5 diameters 

 <2 diameters 
Bags Samples

to analyzers

Figure 2

Site: Sampling Dates:

USEPA Method 3A December 7-8, 2011

Johns Manville

Defiance, Ohio

BT Environmental Consulting, Inc.

4949 Fernlee Avenue

Royal Oak, Michigan

Data Acquisition System 

Calibration Gases 

(Fed to Probe Tip) 

 

Environics Gas 

Dilution System 

M&C Model 100-L 

O2 Analyzer 

CAI Series 600 

CO2 Analyzer 

pump 

tedlar 

bag 
Figure 3

Site: Sampling Dates:USEPA Methods 5/29 December 7-8, 0211Johns ManvilleDefiance, Ohio

BT Environmental Consult

4949 Fernlee Avenue Royal Oak, Michigan 48073

Silica gel 

100 mL 5% HNO3 / 10% H2O2 solution 

Heated Filter Box 

S-Type Pitot w/ Thermocouple 

Heated Probe w/ Glass Liner & Nozzle 

Meter Rig 

Temp. 

ProbeFilter 

On 

Off

-

+

00:00 

1 2 3 4 5 
Figure 4

Site: Sampling Dates:USEPA Method 0061 December 7-8, 2011Johns ManvilleDefiance, Ohio

BT Environmental Cons4949 Fernlee AvenueRoyal Oak, Michigan

Meter Rig 

Temp. 

ProbeFilter 

On 

Off

-

+

00:00 

1 2 3 4 5 

150 mL 0.1 N KOH Empty Silica Gel 

Perastaltic pump 

Teflon tee 

75 mL 0.1 N KOH 
Appendix A 

Field and Computer Generated Raw Data and Field Notes 
Company JM Defiance

Source Designation 89 melter dust collectorTest Date 12/7/2011 Assumed Moisture (Bws) 2

Test Number M29-R1 Condensate Volume (Vlc) 10.7Operator PM/BB/PD Silica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc) 29.6Filter Number 11081884 Nozzle Diameter (in.) 0.268Barometric Pressure (Pb) 30.02 Leak Rate Initial .001@15"Stack Static Pressure (Pg) -0.26 Leak Rate Final .000@8"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.) 42 Traverse points 24*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.) Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp) 0.84Pitot Tube Number 5'F Meter Corr. Factor (Y) 1.002Meter Number MB 4 Orsat Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso) - CO2 0.3Delta ∆H@ 1.7 O2 20.6

Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres. Desired Orifice Actual Orifice Sample Volume Dry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box 

Point (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature 

Number ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts ∆Ps ("H2O) ∆H ("H2O) ∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F) (F) (F) (

1 0 16:15 5 110 0.42 1.97 1.83 854.86 71 64 62 250 251 2 5 5 111 0.42 1.97 1.83 858.68 63 64 49 247 250 3 10 5 111 0.43 2.02 1.87 862.42 66 64 47 249 250 4 15 5 111 0.43 2.02 1.86 866.23 67 65 48 250 250 5 20 5 110 0.41 1.92 1.78 870.02 68 67 50 249 250 6 25 4 110 0.41 1.92 1.78 873.75 69 65 52 250 250 7 30 4 110 0.44 2.07 1.91 877.45 70 65 53 251 250 8 35 4 110 0.44 2.07 1.91 881.25 71 66 54 252 250 9 40 5 109 0.58 2.72 2.52 885.08 72 66 54 250 250 

10 45 5 109 0.58 2.72 2.52 889.52 72 66 54 249 250 11 50 5 109 0.59 2.77 2.57 893.92 73 67 55 251 250 12 55 5 110 0.59 2.77 2.57 898.34 73 67 55 251 250 13 60 6 110 0.59 2.77 2.57 902.78 73 67 56 250 250 14 65 6 110 0.59 2.77 2.57 907.24 74 67 56 248 250 15 70 6 109 0.57 2.68 2.49 911.72 74 68 56 250 250 16 75 6 109 0.57 2.68 2.49 916.10 73 68 56 252 250 17 80 6 109 0.53 2.49 2.32 920.46 73 68 56 250 250 18 85 6 109 0.53 2.49 2.32 924.66 73 68 56 249 250 19 90 6 109 0.51 2.39 2.23 928.92 74 68 56 249 250 20 95 6 109 0.51 2.39 2.23 933.09 74 68 56 250 250 21 100 5 108 0.51 2.39 2.23 937.27 74 68 55 250 250 22 105 5 109 0.51 2.39 2.23 941.40 73 68 55 250 250 23 110 5 109 0.51 2.39 2.23 945.58 74 68 55 250 250 24 115 18:15 5 108 0.51 2.39 2.23 949.70 74 68 55 249 250 

120 18:34 953.84

1 120 7 107 0.65 3.05 2.85 954.52 68 67 55 247 250 2 125 7 108 0.65 3.05 2.85 959.20 70 68 51 250 250 3 130 7 107 0.65 3.05 2.86 963.92 72 67 51 250 250 4 135 7 107 0.65 3.05 2.86 968.62 72 68 52 250 250 5 140 7 107 0.63 2.96 2.76 973.30 72 68 52 250 250 6 145 7 107 0.63 2.96 2.76 977.90 73 68 53 250 250 7 150 7 107 0.63 2.96 2.76 982.49 73 68 53 250 250 8 155 7 107 0.63 2.96 2.76 987.06 73 68 53 253 250 9 160 7 107 0.63 2.96 2.76 991.75 73 68 53 251 250 

10 165 7 107 0.63 2.96 2.76 996.39 73 68 54 251 250 11 170 7 107 0.61 2.86 2.67 1001.03 72 68 54 248 250 12 175 7 107 0.61 2.86 2.67 1005.60 72 68 54 250 250 13 180 6 107 0.53 2.49 2.32 1010.16 72 68 54 251 250 14 185 6 107 0.53 2.49 2.32 1014.380 72 68 54 251 250 15 190 5 107 0.5 2.35 2.2 1018.590 72 68 54 250 250 16 195 5 107 0.5 2.36 2.2 1022.730 72 68 54 250 250 17 200 5 107 0.48 2.26 2.12 1026.860 72 68 53 249 250 18 205 5 107 0.48 2.27 2.12 1030.880 72 68 53 250 250 19 210 5 107 0.48 2.27 2.12 1034.890 72 68 53 250 250 20 215 5 107 0.48 2.27 2.12 1038.900 72 68 53 250 250 21 220 5 107 0.52 2.46 2.3 1042.930 72 68 53 250 250 22 225 5 106 0.52 2.47 2.3 1047.130 72 67 53 250 250 23 230 5 107 0.52 2.47 2.3 1051.300 72 67 53 249 250 24 235 5 107 0.52 2.47 2.3 1055.480 72 67 53 250 250 

240 20:34 1059.620

Average 240 108.3 0.54 2.53 2.36 204.080 71.8 67.2 53.7 249.9 250.0 

69.50
Company JM Defiance

Source Designation 89 melter dust collectorTest Date 12/8/2011 Assumed Moisture (Bws) 2Test Number M29-R2 Condensate Volume (Vlc) 16.3Operator PM/PD Silica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc) 28.6Filter Number 11081883 Nozzle Diameter (in.) 0.268Barometric Pressure (Pb) 30.18 Leak Rate Initial .001@15"Stack Static Pressure (Ps) -0.26 Leak Rate Final .001@10"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.) 42 Traverse points 24*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.) Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp) 0.84Pitot Tube Number 5ft F Meter Corr. Factor (Y) 1.002Meter Number MB 5 Orsat Results (%)

Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso) CO2 0Delta ∆H@ 1.7 O2 21.1

Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres. Desired Orifice Orifice Sample Volume Dry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Exp

Point (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature DG

Number ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts ∆Ps ("H2O) ∆H ("H2O) ∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F) (F) (F) (cubi

1 0 8:00 2 110 0.53 2.48 2.28 60.21 60 60 57 256 258 642 5 2 110 0.53 2.48 2.28 64.32 61 60 48 249 250 683 10 2 110 0.53 2.48 2.28 68.42 61 60 48 248 250 724 15 2 110 0.53 2.48 2.28 72.54 64 61 42 249 250 765 20 2 110 0.55 2.58 2.38 76.69 66 61 43 250 250 816 25 2 110 0.55 2.58 2.38 80.93 68 61 43 251 250 857 30 2 111 0.54 2.54 2.34 85.19 69 32 44 250 250 898 35 2 111 0.54 2.54 2.34 89.31 70 63 44 251 250 939 40 2 111 0.54 2.55 2.34 93.55 70 63 44 251 250 98

10 45 2 111 0.54 2.55 2.35 97.75 70 63 44 250 250 10211 50 2 111 0.52 2.46 2.27 101.95 71 64 45 250 250 1012 55 2 111 0.52 2.46 2.27 106.08 72 65 45 251 250 11013 60 2 111 0.48 2.27 1.97 110.20 72 65 45 249 249 11414 65 2 111 0.48 2.28 2.11 114.19 72 66 45 251 250 1115 70 2 110 0.45 2.14 1.98 118.21 72 66 45 251 250 12216 75 2 111 0.45 2.14 1.98 122.11 72 66 45 250 250 1217 80 2 111 0.45 2.14 1.98 126.00 73 67 45 250 250 13018 85 2 111 0.45 2.14 1.98 129.90 73 67 45 250 250 13419 90 2 111 0.44 2.10 1.95 133.80 73 67 45 250 250 13720 95 2 111 0.44 2.10 1.95 137.63 73 67 45 250 250 1421 100 2 111 0.42 2.01 1.87 141.46 73 68 46 250 250 1422 105 2 111 0.42 2.01 1.87 145.23 73 67 45 250 250 14923 110 2 110 0.42 2.01 1.87 148.99 73 67 45 250 250 1524 115 2 109 0.42 2.02 1.91 152.76 73 68 46 250 250 15

120 10:00 156.56

1 120 10:09 2 110 0.53 2.55 2.41 156.83 70 68 48 249 250 162 125 2 110 0.53 2.55 2.41 161.03 71 68 46 250 250 163 130 2 109 0.53 2.55 2.41 165.26 73 68 44 249 250 1694 135 3 109 0.53 2.56 2.42 169.50 73 68 44 250 250 1745 140 3 109 0.55 2.66 2.52 173.74 74 68 45 250 250 176 145 3 110 0.55 2.66 2.52 178.07 74 68 46 249 249 1827 150 4 110 0.54 2.61 2.48 182.40 74 68 46 250 249 188 155 4 110 0.54 2.62 2.48 186.68 74 68 46 250 250 199 160 4 111 0.57 2.77 2.62 190.96 74 69 47 250 250 19

10 165 4 111 0.57 2.77 2.63 195.390 74 69 47 251 250 20011 170 4 111 0.58 2.82 2.68 199.800 74 69 47 250 250 20412 175 4 111 0.58 2.82 2.68 204.250 75 69 47 249 250 2013 180 3 111 0.55 2.68 2.54 208.720 76 70 47 250 250 2114 185 3 112 0.55 2.68 2.54 213.090 76 70 47 250 250 21715 190 3 112 0.54 2.64 2.5 217.440 76 70 47 250 250 22216 195 3 112 0.54 2.64 2.5 221.750 76 70 47 250 250 2217 200 3 112 0.54 2.64 2.51 226.060 76 70 47 250 250 23018 205 3 112 0.54 2.65 2.51 230.350 76 70 47 250 250 23419 210 3 112 0.55 2.70 2.56 234.640 76 70 47 251 250 23920 215 3 112 0.55 2.70 2.56 238.970 76 70 47 250 251 2421 220 3 112 0.56 2.75 2.6 243.300 76 71 47 249 250 24722 225 3 112 0.56 2.76 2.62 247.670 76 71 48 250 250 25223 230 3 112 0.56 2.76 2.62 252.040 76 71 48 250 250 2524 235 3 112 0.56 2.76 2.63 256.430 76 72 48 250 250 26

240 12:09 260.840

Average 240 110.8 0.52 2.50 2.34 200.360 72 66 46 250 250 1

69.22
Company JM Defiance

Source Designation 89 melter dust collectorTest Date 12/8/2011 Assumed Moisture (Bws) 2Test Number M29-R3 Condensate Volume (Vlc) 16.5Operator PM/PD Silica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc) 31.9Filter Number 11081882 Nozzle Diameter (in.) 0.268Barometric Pressure (Pb) 30.18 Leak Rate Initial .001@15"Stack Static Pressure (Ps) -0.26 Leak Rate Final .000@6"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.) 42 Traverse points 24*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.) Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp) 0.84Pitot Tube Number 5ft F Meter Corr. Factor (Y) 1.002Meter Number MB 5 Orsat Results (%)

Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso) CO2 0.2Delta ∆H@ 1.7 O2 21

Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres. Desired Orifice Orifice Sample Volume Dry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Exp

Point (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature DG

Number ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts ∆Ps ("H2O) ∆H ("H2O) ∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F) (F) (F) (cubi

1 0 12:45 4 110 0.51 2.40 2.26 261.16 68 69 58 251 252 262 5 4 110 0.51 2.40 2.26 265.29 68 68 54 252 251 2693 10 4 110 0.51 2.40 2.26 269.44 68 68 49 249 250 274 15 4 109 0.51 2.40 2.26 273.58 71 68 47 250 251 275 20 4 109 0.54 2.55 2.41 277.78 74 68 48 249 250 2826 25 4 109 0.54 2.55 2.40 282.10 74 68 48 249 250 287 30 4 109 0.55 2.59 2.45 286.40 75 69 48 250 250 298 35 4 109 0.55 2.59 2.45 290.73 75 69 48 252 250 299 40 4 109 0.56 2.64 2.50 295.08 75 69 48 250 250 299

10 45 4 109 0.56 2.64 2.49 299.47 76 70 48 250 250 30411 50 4 109 0.54 2.55 2.41 303.85 76 70 48 250 250 3012 55 4 110 0.54 2.55 2.41 308.15 76 70 48 251 250 31213 60 4 110 0.55 2.59 2.46 312.45 76 70 48 250 250 31714 65 4 110 0.55 2.59 2.45 316.78 76 70 48 250 250 3215 70 4 110 0.54 2.55 2.41 321.12 77 71 48 250 250 3216 75 4 110 0.54 2.55 2.41 325.44 77 71 48 250 250 33017 80 4 110 0.55 2.59 2.46 329.76 77 71 49 250 250 33418 85 4 110 0.55 2.59 2.46 334.12 77 71 49 250 250 3319 90 4 110 0.54 2.55 2.41 338.48 77 71 49 250 250 3420 95 4 110 0.54 2.55 2.41 342.80 77 71 49 250 250 34721 100 4 110 0.53 2.50 2.37 347.14 77 71 49 250 250 3522 105 4 110 0.53 2.50 2.37 351.42 76 71 49 250 250 3523 110 4 110 0.53 2.50 2.37 355.68 76 72 48 250 250 36024 115 4 110 0.53 2.50 2.37 359.95 76 71 49 250 250 364

120 14:45 364.21

1 120 14:52 4 110 0.56 2.64 2.51 364.32 73 71 52 250 250 362 125 3 110 0.56 2.64 2.50 368.71 74 71 51 250 250 373 130 3 110 0.56 2.64 2.50 373.08 75 71 48 250 250 3774 135 3 110 0.56 2.64 2.50 377.45 76 71 49 250 250 3825 140 3 110 0.58 2.74 2.60 381.84 77 71 49 250 250 386 145 3 110 0.58 2.74 2.59 386.32 77 71 50 250 250 397 150 3 110 0.56 2.64 2.51 390.82 77 72 50 250 250 398 155 3 110 0.56 2.64 2.50 395.24 77 72 51 250 250 3999 160 3 110 0.55 2.59 2.46 399.66 77 72 51 250 250 404

10 165 3 110 0.55 2.59 2.46 404.040 77 72 51 250 250 4011 170 3 110 0.54 2.55 2.42 408.400 77 72 51 250 250 41212 175 3 110 0.54 2.55 2.42 412.710 77 72 51 250 250 41713 180 3 110 0.48 2.26 2.15 417.020 78 72 51 250 250 4214 185 3 110 0.48 2.27 2.15 421.070 78 72 51 250 250 4215 190 3 110 0.46 2.17 2.07 425.120 77 72 51 250 250 42916 195 3 110 0.46 2.18 2.07 429.100 77 72 51 250 250 4317 200 3 110 0.46 2.18 2.07 433.100 77 72 52 251 250 43718 205 3 110 0.46 2.18 2.12 437.070 77 72 52 250 250 4419 210 3 110 0.47 2.23 2.12 441.050 77 72 52 251 250 4420 215 3 110 0.47 2.23 2.12 445.080 77 72 52 250 250 44921 220 3 110 0.45 2.14 2.04 449.130 78 72 52 250 250 4522 225 3 110 0.45 2.14 2.03 453.100 78 73 52 249 250 45723 230 3 110 0.45 2.15 2.04 457.080 78 73 52 250 250 4624 235 3 110 0.45 2.15 2.04 461.020 78 73 52 250 250 46

240 16:52 464.980

Average 240 109.8 0.52 2.47 2.34 203.710 75.8 70.9 50.0 250.1 250.1 36

73.34
Company JM Defiance

Source Designation 89 melter dust collectorTest Date 12/7/2011 Assumed Moisture (Bws) 2

Test Number 1 Condensate Volume (Vlc) 10.7Operator MY Silica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc) 30Filter Number Nozzle Diameter (in.) 0.259Barometric Pressure (Pb) 30.02 Leak Rate Initial .0@15"

Stack Static Pressure (Pg) -0.26 Leak Rate Final 0.000 @ 7"

Stack Dimensions 1 (in.) 42 Traverse points 24*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.) Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp) 0.84Pitot Tube Number 4'A Meter Corr. Factor (Y) 1.003Meter Number MB 5 Orsat Results (%)Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso) CO2 0.3Delta ∆H@ 1.82 O2 20.6

Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres. Desired Orifice Actual Orifice Sample Volume Dry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Filter Box E

Point (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature Temperatu

Number ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts ∆Ps ("H2O) ∆H ("H2O) ∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F) (F) (F) (F) 

1 0 16:15 3 111 0.45 1.98 1.93 487.17 61 61 47 na na na 2 5 3 111 0.45 1.98 1.93 490.90 66 63 54 na na na 3 10 3 112 0.51 2.25 2.20 494.74 69 64 52 na na na 4 15 3 111 0.51 2.25 2.20 498.85 72 65 52 na na na 5 20 3 111 0.44 1.94 1.91 502.99 73 66 55 na na na 6 25 3 111 0.45 1.98 1.95 506.83 74 66 56 na na na 7 30 3 111 0.43 1.90 1.87 510.68 75 67 57 na na na 8 35 3 111 0.43 1.90 1.87 514.44 75 68 58 na na na 9 40 4 110 0.54 2.38 2.35 518.24 75 68 59 na na na 

10 45 4 110 0.54 2.38 2.35 522.52 76 69 60 na na na 11 50 4 110 0.59 2.60 2.57 526.83 77 69 60 na na na 12 55 4 111 0.63 2.78 2.75 531.27 77 70 62 na na na 13 60 5 111 0.64 2.82 2.80 535.88 78 70 62 na na na 14 65 5 110 0.64 2.82 2.80 540.56 78 71 63 na na na 15 70 5 110 0.61 2.69 2.67 545.26 78 71 63 na na na 16 75 5 110 0.61 2.69 2.67 549.76 78 71 63 na na na 17 80 5 110 0.63 2.78 2.76 554.37 78 71 63 na na na 18 85 5 109 0.63 2.78 2.76 558.99 78 71 62 na na na 19 90 5 109 0.63 2.78 2.76 563.62 79 72 63 na na na 20 95 5 109 0.61 2.69 2.68 568.26 79 72 62 na na na 21 100 5 110 0.61 2.69 2.68 572.82 79 72 63 na na na 22 105 5 110 0.64 2.82 2.81 577.37 79 72 63 na na na 23 110 5 108 0.54 2.38 2.37 582.02 79 72 64 na na na 24 115 5 109 0.60 2.64 2.64 586.33 78 72 63 na na na 

120 18:15 590.82 na na na

1 120 18:34 4 110 0.60 2.64 2.64 590.82 70 71 48 na na na 2 125 4 109 0.60 2.64 2.64 595.34 74 71 58 na na na 3 130 4 109 0.62 2.73 2.73 599.88 77 71 58 na na na 4 135 4 109 0.62 2.73 2.73 604.46 78 71 58 na na na 5 140 4 108 0.59 2.60 2.60 609.06 78 71 59 na na na 6 145 4 108 0.59 2.60 2.60 613.51 78 71 58 na na na 7 150 4 108 0.59 2.60 2.60 617.97 78 71 58 na na na 8 155 4 108 0.59 2.60 2.60 622.45 78 71 59 na na na 9 160 4 108 0.59 2.60 2.60 626.95 78 71 60 na na na 

10 165 4 108 0.63 2.78 2.77 631.45 78 71 60 na na na 11 170 4 108 0.61 2.69 2.69 636.07 79 72 60 na na na 12 175 4 108 0.62 2.73 2.73 640.59 78 72 60 na na na 13 180 4 108 0.60 2.64 2.64 645.20 78 72 60 na na na 14 185 4 108 0.57 2.52 2.52 649.72 78 72 58 na na na 15 190 4 108 0.57 2.52 2.52 654.16 78 72 59 na na na 16 195 4 108 0.52 2.30 2.3 658.58 78 72 60 na na na 17 200 4 108 0.5 2.21 2.22 662.82 78 72 60 na na na 18 205 4 107 0.5 2.22 2.22 666.99 78 72 59 na na na 19 210 4 108 0.5 2.22 2.22 671.17 78 72 59 na na na 20 215 4 108 0.49 2.18 2.18 675.31 77 71 60 na na na 21 220 4 107 0.53 2.36 2.36 679.40 77 71 60 na na na 22 225 4 107 0.53 2.36 2.36 683.67 77 71 61 na na na 23 230 4 107 0.52 2.32 2.32 687.93 77 71 62 na na na 24 235 4 107 0.52 2.32 2.33 692.20 77 71 62 na na na 

240 20:34 696.41

Average 240 109.1 0.56 2.48 2.47 209.240 76.4 70.1 59.2 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 

73.25
Company JM Defiance

Source Designation 89 melter dust collectorTest Date 12/8/2011 Assumed Moisture (Bws) 1Test Number 2 Condensate Volume (Vlc) 9.7Operator MY Silica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc) 35.3Filter Number Nozzle Diameter (in.) 0.259

Barometric Pressure (Pb) 30.18 Leak Rate Initial .0@15"

Stack Static Pressure (Ps) -0.26 Leak Rate Final .0@7"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.) 42 Traverse points 24*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.) Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp) 0.84Pitot Tube Number 4'A Meter Corr. Factor (Y) 1.003Meter Number MB 5 Orsat Results (%)

Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso) CO2 0Delta ∆H@ 1.82 O2 21.1

Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres. Desired Orifice Orifice Sample Volume Dry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Filter Box Exit 

Point (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature Temperature 

Number ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts ∆Ps ("H2O) ∆H ("H2O) ∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F) (F) (F) (F) 

1 0 8:00 4 110 0.51 2.28 2.19 696.75 60 60 56 na na na 2 5 4 111 0.51 2.28 2.19 700.74 61 60 51 na na na 3 10 4 111 0.50 2.24 2.15 704.83 63 61 47 na na na 4 15 4 111 0.50 2.24 2.15 708.83 65 61 46 na na na 5 20 4 111 0.50 2.24 2.16 712.83 67 62 47 na na na 6 25 4 111 0.52 2.33 2.25 716.83 69 62 47 na na na 7 30 4 111 0.50 2.25 2.17 720.81 70 63 48 na na na 8 35 4 111 0.50 2.25 2.18 724.84 71 64 49 na na na 9 40 4 111 0.49 2.21 2.14 728.91 72 65 49 na na na 

10 45 4 111 0.49 2.21 2.14 732.95 73 65 49 na na na 11 50 4 111 0.52 2.35 2.28 736.99 74 66 50 na na na 12 55 4 111 0.52 2.35 2.28 741.18 75 67 50 na na na 13 60 4 111 0.49 2.22 2.16 745.36 75 67 50 na na na 14 65 4 111 0.47 2.13 2.07 749.46 75 68 50 na na na 15 70 4 111 0.43 1.95 1.90 753.42 76 68 51 na na na 16 75 4 111 0.42 1.91 1.86 757.22 76 69 51 na na na 17 80 4 111 0.40 1.82 1.79 760.98 76 69 50 na na na 18 85 4 111 0.40 1.82 1.78 764.69 76 69 51 na na na 19 90 4 111 0.39 1.78 1.74 768.35 76 69 51 na na na 20 95 4 111 0.39 1.78 1.74 772.00 76 70 51 na na na 21 100 4 111 0.38 1.74 1.70 775.67 76 70 51 na na na 22 105 4 109 0.42 1.92 1.88 779.27 76 70 51 na na na 23 110 4 109 0.42 1.92 1.88 783.07 77 70 51 na na na 24 115 4 109 0.41 1.88 1.87 786.88 77 71 51 na na na 

120 10:00 790.68 na na na

1 120 10:09 5 110 0.52 2.39 2.38 790.68 72 70 51 na na na 2 125 5 110 0.52 2.39 2.38 794.93 75 70 52 na na na 3 130 4 110 0.50 2.30 2.29 799.19 77 71 49 na na na 4 135 4 110 0.50 2.30 2.29 803.37 77 71 49 na na na 5 140 4 110 0.50 2.31 2.30 807.56 78 71 50 na na na 6 145 4 111 0.49 2.26 2.26 811.74 78 71 50 na na na 7 150 4 111 0.50 2.31 2.30 815.93 78 71 51 na na na 8 155 4 111 0.50 2.31 2.30 820.10 78 72 51 na na na 9 160 4 111 0.51 2.36 2.36 824.30 78 72 51 na na na 

10 165 5 112 0.53 2.46 2.45 828.550 79 72 51 na na na 11 170 5 112 0.51 2.37 2.37 832.830 79 72 51 na na na 12 175 5 112 0.55 2.56 2.55 837.090 79 72 51 na na na 13 180 5 112 0.53 2.47 2.46 841.470 80 73 51 na na na 14 185 5 113 0.53 2.47 2.47 845.800 80 73 51 na na na 15 190 5 113 0.55 2.57 2.56 850.090 80 73 52 na na na 16 195 5 113 0.55 2.57 2.57 854.510 80 73 52 na na na 17 200 5 112 0.55 2.57 2.57 858.910 80 73 52 na na na 18 205 5 112 0.55 2.58 2.57 863.320 80 73 53 na na na 19 210 5 111 0.5 2.34 2.34 867.710 81 74 53 na na na 20 215 5 111 0.5 2.35 2.34 871.860 80 74 53 na na na 21 220 4 111 0.45 2.11 2.11 875.990 80 74 53 na na na 22 225 4 110 0.45 2.12 2.12 880.010 80 74 53 na na na 23 230 4 110 0.46 2.17 2.17 883.990 80 74 53 na na na 24 235 4 111 0.45 2.12 2.12 888.020 80 74 53 na na na 

240 12:09 892.020

Average 240 111.0 0.49 2.23 2.19 195.270 75 69 51 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 

72.33
Company JM Defiance

Source Designation 89 melter dust collectorTest Date 12/8/2011 Assumed Moisture (Bws) 1Test Number 3 Condensate Volume (Vlc) 4Operator MY Silica Gel Weight Gain (Vlc) 39.2Filter Number Nozzle Diameter (in.) 0.259

Barometric Pressure (Pb) 30.18 Leak Rate Initial .001@15"

Stack Static Pressure (Ps) -0.26 Leak Rate Final .0@7"Stack Dimensions 1 (in.) 42 Traverse points 24*Stack Dimensions 2 (in.) Pitot Corr. Factor (Cp) 0.84Pitot Tube Number 4'A Meter Corr. Factor (Y) 1.003Meter Number MB 5 Orsat Results (%)

Meter Isokinetic Factor (Kiso) CO2 0.2Delta ∆H@ 1.82 O2 21

Traverse Sampling Time Sampling Stack Temp.Velocity Pres. Desired Orifice Orifice Sample Volume Dry Gas Meter Temp. Last Impinger Probe Filter Box Filter Box Exit 

Point (Minutes) Clock Time Train Vac. (F) ("H2O) Differential Differential (cubic feet) Inlet Outlet Temperature Temperature Temperature Temperature 

Number ø (24 hour) ("Hg) Ts ∆Ps ("H2O) ∆H ("H2O) ∆H Vm (F) Tm (F) Tm (F) (F) (F) (F) 

1 0 12:45 4 111 0.50 2.25 2.23 892.25 72 72 59 na na na 2 5 4 111 0.50 2.25 2.23 896.39 73 72 55 na na na 3 10 4 110 0.49 2.21 2.19 900.48 75 72 53 na na na 4 15 4 110 0.49 2.21 2.19 904.60 77 72 54 na na na 5 20 4 110 0.48 2.16 2.15 908.70 78 72 55 na na na 6 25 4 110 0.48 2.16 2.15 912.78 78 72 57 na na na 7 30 4 110 0.48 2.16 2.15 916.84 79 72 58 na na na 8 35 4 110 0.46 2.07 2.06 920.92 79 72 58 na na na 9 40 4 110 0.48 2.16 2.15 924.89 79 73 59 na na na 

10 45 4 110 0.48 2.16 2.15 928.96 80 73 60 na na na 11 50 4 110 0.50 2.25 2.25 933.02 80 73 61 na na na 12 55 4 110 0.50 2.25 2.25 937.19 80 73 61 na na na 13 60 4 111 0.54 2.43 2.43 941.34 80 74 62 na na na 14 65 4 111 0.54 2.43 2.43 945.64 81 74 62 na na na 15 70 4 111 0.52 2.34 2.34 949.96 81 74 62 na na na 16 75 4 111 0.53 2.39 2.38 954.21 81 74 63 na na na 17 80 4 110 0.54 2.43 2.43 958.51 81 74 63 na na na 18 85 4 110 0.54 2.43 2.43 962.86 81 74 64 na na na 19 90 4 110 0.54 2.43 2.43 967.21 81 74 64 na na na 20 95 4 110 0.54 2.43 2.43 971.58 81 74 64 na na na 21 100 4 110 0.49 2.21 2.21 975.94 81 74 64 na na na 22 105 4 110 0.49 2.21 2.21 980.06 81 74 64 na na na 23 110 4 109 0.47 2.12 2.12 984.15 81 75 64 na na na 24 115 4 110 0.47 2.12 2.12 988.24 81 75 65 na na na 

120 14:45 992.34 na na na

1 120 14:52 4 111 0.52 2.34 2.34 992.34 77 74 64 na na na 2 125 4 111 0.52 2.34 2.34 996.55 78 74 64 na na na 3 130 4 111 0.51 2.30 2.30 1000.80 80 74 63 na na na 4 135 4 111 0.50 2.25 2.25 1005.04 81 74 64 na na na 5 140 4 111 0.49 2.21 2.21 1009.22 81 75 65 na na na 6 145 4 111 0.49 2.21 2.21 1013.35 81 75 65 na na na 7 150 4 111 0.50 2.25 2.25 1017.49 82 75 66 na na na 8 155 4 111 0.50 2.25 2.25 1021.71 82 75 65 na na na 9 160 4 111 0.52 2.34 2.34 1025.94 82 75 61 na na na 

10 165 4 111 0.52 2.34 2.34 1030.200 82 75 57 na na na 11 170 4 111 0.54 2.43 2.43 1034.470 82 75 55 na na na 12 175 4 111 0.54 2.43 2.43 1038.800 82 75 53 na na na 13 180 4 111 0.47 2.12 2.12 1043.110 82 75 52 na na na 14 185 4 111 0.47 2.12 2.12 1047.170 82 75 52 na na na 15 190 4 111 0.45 2.03 2.03 1051.300 82 76 51 na na na 16 195 4 110 0.45 2.04 2.04 1055.200 82 76 51 na na na 17 200 4 110 0.42 1.90 1.9 1059.100 82 76 51 na na na 18 205 4 110 0.42 1.90 1.9 1062.950 82 76 51 na na na 19 210 4 110 0.4 1.82 1.82 1066.760 82 76 51 na na na 20 215 4 110 0.35 1.59 1.59 1070.580 81 70 51 na na na 21 220 4 110 0.37 1.68 1.68 1074.220 81 76 51 na na na 22 225 4 110 0.37 1.69 1.69 1077.880 81 76 51 na na na 23 230 4 110 0.38 1.73 1.73 1081.510 81 76 51 na na na 24 235 4 110 0.38 1.73 1.74 1085.160 81 76 51 na na na 

240 16:52 1088.800

Average 240 110.4 0.48 2.17 2.17 196.550 80.2 74.1 58.5 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 

77.17




















Appendix B 

 Process Data 
Appendix C 

Equipment Calibration Documents 
Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentration Results Summary

Johns Manville - Defiance, Ohio

BTEC Project No. 11-4191.01

Sampling Dates: December 7 & 8, 2011

Parameter Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average

Test Run Date 12/7/2011 12/8/2011 12/8/2011Test Time 21:11 15:07 17:57Oxygen concentration (%) 20.86 20.95 20.79 20.87Oxygen concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A) 20.57 21.11 20.95 20.88Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) 0.36 -0.03 0.12 0.15Carbon Dioxide concentration (%) (corrected as per USEPA 3A) 0.34 0.01 0.16 0.17CO2 Correction O2 Corr

1 2 3 

Co 0.03 -0.04 -0.04 Co 

Cma 10.10 10.10 10.10 Cma 

Cm 9.95 10.07 10.07 Cm 

Co= Average of initial and final zero gasesCma=Actual concentration of the calibration gasCm= Average of initial and final calibration gases



METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES

1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time

necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.

4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.

INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)

DATE: 10/26/2011 METER SERIAL #: C-5000 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 29.78 29.81 29.795 

METER PART #: MB3 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: 1447 

K' TESTED TEMPERATURES °F ELAPSED

FACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT3) AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN) DGM ΔH (1) 

ORIFICE # RUN # (AVG) (in Hg) INITIAL FINAL NET (Vm) INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVG θ (in H2O) Vm (STD) Vcr 

1 0.8778 16 913.70 920.465 6.765 66 68 67 68 67 67.5 6.00 4.4 6.8176 6.2 0.8778 16 920.465 927.282 6.817 66 67 69 67 67 67.5 6.00 4.4 6.870 6.3 0.8778 16 927.282 934.090 6.808 66 69 71 67 67 68.5 6.00 4.4 6.8480 6.1 0.5057 16 934.090 939.924 5.834 66 71 71 67 68 69.25 9.00 1.35 5.8163 5.2 0.5057 16 939.924 945.752 5.828 66 71 72 68 68 69.75 9.00 1.35 5.8048 5.3 0.5057 16 945.752 953.578 7.826 66 72 72 68 68 70 12.00 1.35 7.7912 7.1 0.3367 16 953.578 958.890 5.312 66 72 70 68 68 69.5 12.00 0.61 5.2837 5.2 0.3367 16 958.890 964.644 5.754 66 70 70 68 68 69 13.00 0.61 5.7288 5.3 0.3367 16 964.644 969.964 5.320 66 70 70 68 68 69 12.00 0.61 5.2967 5.

AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACT

AVERAG

(1) = Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions

K1 = 17.64 oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858 oK/mm Hg (Metric)

Tm = Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric) ΔH@ = 0.

Vcr

(2) = Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions

Tamb = Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric)

K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration

(3) = DGM calibration factor

321812

ENVIRONMENTAL 

USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm (std), and the critical 

orifice, Vcr (std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above. 

( 

Tm

Pbar

H Vm std

K Vm ( /13.6) ( ) 1

+ Δ = ∗ ∗

Tamb

Pbar Vcr std

K ∗ Θ ( ) = '∗

( )( )

stdstd

Vm

Vcr

Y =
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES

1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time

necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.

4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.

INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)

DATE: 1/13/2012 METER SERIAL #: C-5000 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 29.54 29.54 29.54 

METER PART #: MB3 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: 1447 

K' TESTED TEMPERATURES °F ELAPSED

FACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT3) AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN) DGM ΔH (1) 

ORIFICE # RUN # (AVG) (in Hg) INITIAL FINAL NET (Vm) INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVG θ (in H2O) Vm (STD) Vcr 

1 0.8778 16 602.70 609.330 6.630 67 52 54 50 52 52 6.00 4.1 6.8206 6.2 0.8778 16 609.330 615.980 6.650 66 54 57 52 53 54 6.00 4.1 6.8146 6.3 0.8778 16 615.980 622.670 6.690 66 57 61 53 55 56.5 6.00 4.1 6.8224 6.1 0.5057 16 623.0 628.760 5.760 65 60 63 56 58 59.25 9.00 1.3 5.8025 5.2 0.5057 16 628.760 634.550 5.790 66 63 66 58 60 61.75 9.00 1.3 5.8048 5.3 0.5057 16 634.550 640.340 5.790 67 66 68 60 62 64 9.00 1.3 5.7798 5.1 0.3367 16 640.50 645.810 5.310 66 66 68 62 64 65 12.00 0.58 5.2811 5.2 0.3367 16 645.810 651.120 5.310 67 68 70 64 65 66.75 12.00 0.58 5.2636 5.3 0.3367 16 651.120 656.460 5.340 67 70 70 65 67 68 12.00 0.58 5.2808 5.

AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACT

AVERAG

(1) = Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions

K1 = 17.64 oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858 oK/mm Hg (Metric)

Tm = Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric) ΔH@ = 0.

Vcr

(2) = Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions

Tamb = Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric)

K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration

(3) = DGM calibration factor

321812

ENVIRONMENTAL 

USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm (std), and the critical 

orifice, Vcr (std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above. 

( 

Tm

Pbar

H Vm std

K Vm ( /13.6) ( ) 1

+ Δ = ∗ ∗

Tamb

Pbar Vcr std

K ∗ Θ ( ) = '∗

( )( )

stdstd

Vm

Vcr

Y =
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES

1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time

necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.

4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.

INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)

DATE: 10/24/2011 METER SERIAL #: CA 4 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 29.93 29.96 29.945 

METER PART #: MB4 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: 1447 

K' TESTED TEMPERATURES °F ELAPSED

FACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT3) AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN) DGM ΔH (1) 

ORIFICE # RUN # (AVG) (in Hg) INITIAL FINAL NET (Vm) INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVG θ (in H2O) Vm (STD) Vc

1 0.6665 15 804.80 809.970 5.170 68 65 67 65 66 65.75 6.00 2.3 5.2268 52 0.6665 15 809.970 815.20 5.230 67 67 66 66 67 66.5 6.00 2.3 5.2799 53 0.6665 15 815.20 820.40 5.20 65 66 69 67 66 67 6.00 2.3 5.2447 51 0.5057 15 820.50 826.330 5.830 67 66 70 67 67 67.5 9.00 1.25 5.8594 52 0.5057 15 826.330 832.150 5.820 67 70 71 67 67 68.75 9.00 1.25 5.8355 53 0.5057 15 832.150 837.960 5.810 67 71 72 67 68 69.5 9.00 1.25 5.8173 51 0.3367 15 838.10 843.420 5.320 67 72 71 69 69 70.25 12.00 0.6 5.3106 52 0.3367 15 843.420 848.710 5.290 67 72 72 69 69 70.5 12.00 0.6 5.2782 53 0.3367 15 848.710 854.040 5.330 67 72 73 70 70 71.25 12.00 0.6 5.3106 5

AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACT

AVERAG

(1) = Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions

K1 = 17.64 oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858 oK/mm Hg (Metric)

Tm = Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric) ΔH@ = 0

Vc

(2) = Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions

Tamb = Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric)

K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration

(3) = DGM calibration factor

241812

ENVIRONMENTAL 

USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm (std), and the critical 

orifice, Vcr (std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above. 

( 

Tm

Pbar

H Vm std

K Vm ( /13.6) ( ) 1

+ Δ = ∗ ∗

Tamb

Pbar Vcr std

K ∗ Θ ( ) = '∗

( )( )

stdstd

Vm

Vcr

Y =
METHOD 5 DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION USING CRITICAL ORIFICES

1) Select three critical orifices to calibrate the dry gas meter which bracket the expected operating range.2) Record barometric pressure before and after calibration procedure.3) Run at tested vacuum (from Orifice Calibration Report), for a period of time

necessary to achieve a minimum total volume of 5 cubic feet.

4) Record data and information in the GREEN cells, YELLOW cells are calculated.

INITIAL FINAL AVG (Pbar)

DATE: 12/16/2011 METER SERIAL #: CA 4 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (in Hg): 30.29 30.26 30.275 

METER PART #: MB4 CRITICAL ORIFICE SET SERIAL #: 1447 

K' TESTED TEMPERATURES °F ELAPSED

FACTOR VACUUM DGM READINGS (FT3) AMBIENT DGM INLET DGM OUTLET DGM TIME (MIN) DGM ΔH (1) 

ORIFICE # RUN # (AVG) (in Hg) INITIAL FINAL NET (Vm) INITIAL FINAL INITIAL FINAL AVG θ (in H2O) Vm (STD) Vc

1 0.6665 15 466.570 471.750 5.180 63 63 63 63 62 62.75 6.00 2.3 5.3247 52 0.6665 15 471.750 476.960 5.210 62 63 63 62 62 62.5 6.00 2.3 5.3581 53 0.6665 15 476.960 482.160 5.20 61 63 64 62 63 63 6.00 2.3 5.3427 51 0.5057 15 482.50 488.260 5.760 65 65 65 63 63 64 9.00 1.3 5.8925 62 0.5057 15 488.260 494.030 5.770 62 65 66 63 63 64.25 9.00 1.3 5.8999 63 0.5057 15 494.030 499.80 5.770 63 66 67 63 64 65 9.00 1.3 5.8915 61 0.3367 15 500.0 505.250 5.250 64 66 66 64 64 65 12.00 0.6 5.3515 52 0.3367 15 505.250 510.510 5.260 62 66 67 64 65 65.5 12.00 0.6 5.3565 53 0.3367 15 510.510 516.650 6.140 63 67 68 65 65 66.25 14.00 0.6 6.2438 6

AVERAGE DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION FACT

AVERAG

(1) = Net volume of gas sample passed through DGM, corrected to standard conditions

K1 = 17.64 oR/in. Hg (English), 0.3858 oK/mm Hg (Metric)

Tm = Absolute DGM avg. temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric) ΔH@ = 0

Vc

(2) = Volume of gas sample passed through the critical orifice, corrected to standard conditions

Tamb = Absolute ambient temperature (oR - English, oK - Metric)

K' = Average K' factor from Critical Orifice Calibration

(3) = DGM calibration factor

241812

ENVIRONMENTAL 

USING THE CRITICAL ORIFICES AS CALIBRATION STANDARDS:The following equations are used to calculate the standard volumes of air passed through the DGM, Vm (std), and the critical 

orifice, Vcr (std), and the DGM calibration factor, Y. These equations are automatically calculated in the spreadsheet above. 

( 

Tm

Pbar

H Vm std

K Vm ( /13.6) ( ) 1

+ Δ = ∗ ∗

Tamb

Pbar Vcr std

K ∗ Θ ( ) = '∗

( )( )

stdstd

Vm

Vcr

Y =





Appendix D 

Laboratory Analytical Results 
Acetone 

Rinse 

Volume 

(mL)

Particulate 

Weight in 

Acetone 

Rinse (mg)

Particulate 

Weight on 

Filter (mg)

Particulate 

Weight in 

Acetone 

Rinse (mg)

Combined 

Particulate 

Weight 

(mg)

Run 1 120 4.6 0.3 3.6 3.9

Run 2 110 2.5 0.3 1.5 1.8

Run 3 130 2.4 0.3 1.3 1.6

Blank 230 2.00 0.30

Method 5 PM Lab Results

Corrected

Sampling Date: December 7-8, 2011

BTEC job #11-4191.00

Defiance, Ohio

Johns Manville
Compound/Fraction

Blank 

Filter 

Result

(μg)

Blank

Filter 

Detection 

Limit

(μg)

Run 1 

Result

(μg)

Run 2 

Result

(μg)

Run 3 

Result

(μg)

Test Run 

Detection 

Limit

(μg)

Run 1

(μg)

Run 2

(μg)

Back Half Chromium 1.45 0.15 1.85 2.13 1.72 0.15 0.40 0.68 

Front Half Chromium 1.30 0.30 7.52 5.92 4.72 0.60 6.22 4.62 

Johns Manville

Method 29 Lab Results

Correcte

Sampling Date: December 7-8, 2011

BTEC job #11-4191.00

Defiance, Ohio
Corrected

Total Volume 

(ml)

Impinger KOH 

(ml)

Hexavalent 

Chromium, 

Cr6+ [μg] RDL

Hexavalent 

Chromium, 

Cr6+ [μg]

Run 1 848 588 0.16 0.30 0.30

Run 2 919 629 0.29 0.30 0.30

Run 3 959 300 0.13 0.30 0.30

Blank KOH 306 0.30 0.30

Note: No blank correction applied. RDL used to calculate results.

Total Volume 

(ml)

Impinger KOH 

(ml)

Back Half 

Chromium 

(μg)

Back Half 

RDL

Front Half 

Chromium 

(μg)

Front Half 

RDL

Rinse 

Chromium 

(μg)

Run 1 848 588 2.00 4.00 0.50 0.30 1.00 

Run 2 919 629 2.00 4.00 0.30 0.30 1.00 Run 3 959 300 2.00 4.00 0.30 0.30 1.00 

Blank KOH 306 1.00 2.00 0.20 0.30 1.00 

Note: No blank correction applied. RDL used for all fractions except Run 1 Front Half Chromium, which was ab

Method 0061 Lab Results

Sampling Date: December 7-8, 2011

BTEC job #11-4191.00

Defiance, Ohio

Johns Manville
Your Project #: 11-4190.00 

Site Location: JM DEFIANCE

Attention: Barry Boulianne

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2011/12/23

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B1J5639

Received: 2011/12/12, 15:15

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) 4 2011/12/21 2011/12/22 BRL SOP-00103 / BRL EPA 6020 / M29 

SOP-00102

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) 4 2011/12/20 2011/12/21 BRL SOP-00103/ BRL EPA 6020 / M29 

SOP-00102

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) 4 2011/12/13 2011/12/19 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315 

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) 4 N/A 2011/12/15 BRL SOP-00109 EPA 5/315/NJATM1 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 4 N/A 2011/12/14 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

CLAYTON JOHNSON, Project Manager

Email: CJohnson@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5769

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B1J5639 Client Project #: 11-4190.00

Report Date: 2011/12/23 Site Location: JM DEFIANCE

EPA M29 METALS (FRONT & BACK)

Maxxam ID L Y 4 5 7 8 L Y 4 5 7 9 L Y 4 5 7 9 L Y 4 5 8 0 L Y 4 5 8 1

Sampling Date 2011/12/08 2011/12/07 2011/12/07 2011/12/08 2011/12/08

 U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RDL RUN RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Lab-Dup

Back Half Chromium (Cr) ug 1.45 0.15 1.85 1.95 2.13 1.72 0.15 2720392

Front Half Chromium (Cr) ug 1.30 0.30 7.52 7.50 5.92 4.72 0.60 2719130

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B1J5639 Client Project #: 11-4190.00

Report Date: 2011/12/23 Site Location: JM DEFIANCE

EPA M5 PARTICULATE MATTER (PM)

Maxxam ID L Y 4 5 7 8 L Y 4 5 7 9 L Y 4 5 8 0 L Y 4 5 8 1

Sampling Date 2011/12/08 2011/12/07 2011/12/08 2011/12/08

 U n i t s BLANK-M5/29 RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M5/29 2-M5/29 3-M5/29

Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg 2.0 4.6 2.5 2.4 0.5 2712098

Front Half Particulate Weight on Filter mg <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.30 2712097

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 230 120 110 130 1 2712099

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B1J5639 Client Project #: 11-4190.00

Report Date: 2011/12/23 Site Location: JM DEFIANCE

Test Summary

Maxxam ID LY4578 Collected 2011/12/08

Sample ID BLANK-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2011/12/12

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2720392 2011/12/21 2011/12/22 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2719130 2011/12/20 2011/12/21 NAN RAYKHA

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2712098 2011/12/13 2011/12/19 FRANK MO

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2712097 N/A 2011/12/15 BRENDA MOORE

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2712099 N/A 2011/12/14 FRANK MO

Maxxam ID LY4579 Collected 2011/12/07

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2011/12/12

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2720392 2011/12/21 2011/12/22 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2719130 2011/12/20 2011/12/21 NAN RAYKHA

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2712098 2011/12/13 2011/12/19 FRANK MO

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2712097 N/A 2011/12/15 BRENDA MOORE

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2712099 N/A 2011/12/14 FRANK MO

Maxxam ID LY4579 D u p Collected 2011/12/07

Sample ID RUN 1-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2011/12/12

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2720392 2011/12/23 2011/12/22 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2719130 2011/12/22 2011/12/21 NAN RAYKHA

Maxxam ID LY4580 Collected 2011/12/08

Sample ID RUN 2-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2011/12/12

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2720392 2011/12/21 2011/12/22 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2719130 2011/12/20 2011/12/21 NAN RAYKHA

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2712098 2011/12/13 2011/12/19 FRANK MO

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2712097 N/A 2011/12/15 BRENDA MOORE

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2712099 N/A 2011/12/14 FRANK MO

Maxxam ID LY4581 Collected 2011/12/08

Sample ID RUN 3-M5/29 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2011/12/12

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020) ICP1/MS 2720392 2011/12/21 2011/12/22 NAN RAYKHA

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020) ICP1/MS 2719130 2011/12/20 2011/12/21 NAN RAYKHA

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201) BAL 2712098 2011/12/13 2011/12/19 FRANK MO

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201) BAL 2712097 N/A 2011/12/15 BRENDA MOORE

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 2712099 N/A 2011/12/14 FRANK MO

Page 4 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B1J5639 Client Project #: 11-4190.00

Report Date: 2011/12/23 Site Location: JM DEFIANCE

EPA M29 METALS (FRONT & BACK)

Metals B.H. in H2O2/HNO3 Imp.(6020): Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample LY4579.

Metals F.H. in Filter + Rinses (6020): Extra 2x dilution was required for all samples except LY4578, due to the matrix

Post digestion duplicate and spike was done on sample LY4579.

EPA M5 PARTICULATE MATTER (PM)

Particulates/Acetone Rinse (M5/315/M201): Reagent blank recieved contains residue after evaporation

Particulates/Filter (M5/315/NJATM1/M201): Negative weights observed.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 7
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: Barry Boulianne 

Client Project #: 11-4190.00

P.O. #:

Site Location: JM DEFIANCE

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB1J5639

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2712098 RSU Method Blank Acetone Rinse Particulate Weight in Acetone 2011/12/19 <0.5 mg

2719130 N_R Matrix Spike

(LY4579) Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/21 102 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(LY4579) Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/21 103 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/21 1 % 20

Spiked Blank Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/21 99 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/21 101 % 85 - 115

RPD Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/21 2.4 % 20

Method Blank Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/21 <0.30 ug

Method Blank DUP Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/21 <0.30 ug

RPD Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/21 NC % 20

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/21 0.2 % 20

2720392 N_R Matrix Spike

(LY4579) Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/22 98 % 70 - 130

Matrix Spike DUP

(LY4579) Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/22 100 % 70 - 130

MS/MSD RPD Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/22 2.0 % 20

Spiked Blank Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/22 101 % 85 - 115

Spiked Blank DUP Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/22 105 % 85 - 115

RPD Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/22 3.4 % 20

Method Blank Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/22 <0.15 ug

Method Blank DUP Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/22 <0.15 ug

RPD Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/22 NC % 20

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/22 5.0 % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 6 of 7
Validation Signature Page

Maxxam Job #: B1J5639

The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s).

FRANK MO, B.Sc., Inorganic Lab. Manager 

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of

ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Page 7 of 7
Your Project #: 11-4190.00 

Site Location: JM DEFIANCE

Attention: James K. Sharp

BT Environmental Consulting

2615 Wolcott St.

Ferndale, MI

USA 48220

Report Date: 2011/12/22

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: B1J5560

Received: 2011/12/12, 15:15

Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train

# Samples Received: 4

Date Date Method

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) 4 2011/12/16 2011/12/16 BRL SOP-00106 EPA 7199 (M0061) 

Chromium on Filter by ICP 4 2011/12/15 2011/12/17 CAM SOP-00408 / BRL EPA M0061 

SOP-00102

Chromium in Impinger by ICP 4 2011/12/15 2011/12/17 CAM SOP-00408 / BRL EPA M0061 

SOP-00102

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP 4 2011/12/15 2011/12/17 CAM SOP-00408 / BRL EPA M0061 

SOP-00102

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 4 N/A 2011/12/15 

Final Volume of Train Rinse 4 N/A 2011/12/15 

* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.

U = Undetected at the limit of quantitation.

J = Estimated concentration between the EDL & RDL.

B = Blank Contamination.

Q = One or more quality control criteria failed.

Encryption Key

Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.

CLAYTON JOHNSON, Project Manager

Email: CJohnson@maxxam.ca

Phone# (905) 817-5769

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section

5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1

Page 1 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B1J5560 Client Project #: 11-4190.00

Report Date: 2011/12/22 Site Location: JM DEFIANCE

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF STACK SAMPLING TRAIN

Maxxam ID L Y 4 1 1 3 L Y 4 1 4 2 L Y 4 1 4 3 L Y 4 1 4 3 L Y 4 1 4 4

Sampling Date 2011/12/08 2011/12/07 2011/12/08 2011/12/08 2011/12/08

 U n i t s BLANK--M0061 RDL RUN RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M0061 2-M0061 2-M0061 3-M0061

Lab-Dup

Acetone Rinse Volume ml 300 1 260 290 340 1 2714839

Potassium Hydroxide Volume ml 306 1 588 629 619 1 2714826

Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) ug 0.3 0.2 0.16 J 0.29 J 0.29 J 0.13 J 0.3 2715660

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B1J5560 Client Project #: 11-4190.00

Report Date: 2011/12/22 Site Location: JM DEFIANCE

ELEMENTS BY ICP-AES (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN)

Maxxam ID L Y 4 1 1 3 L Y 4 1 4 2 L Y 4 1 4 2 L Y 4 1 4 3 L Y 4 1 4 4

Sampling Date 2011/12/08 2011/12/07 2011/12/07 2011/12/08 2011/12/08

 U n i t s BLANK--M0061 RDL RUN RUN RUN RUN RDL QC Batch

1-M0061 1-M0061 2-M0061 3-M0061

Lab-Dup

Back Half Chromium (Cr) ug 1 U 2 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 4 2714109

Front Half Chromium (Cr) ug 0.2 U 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.2 U 0.2 U 0.3 2714113

Rinse Chromium (Cr) ug 1 U 2 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 2714115

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B1J5560 Client Project #: 11-4190.00

Report Date: 2011/12/22 Site Location: JM DEFIANCE

Test Summary

Maxxam ID LY4113 Collected 2011/12/08

Sample ID BLANK--M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2011/12/12

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2715660 2011/12/16 2011/12/16 LANG LE

Chromium on Filter by ICP ICP 2714113 2011/12/15 2011/12/17 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2714109 2011/12/15 2011/12/17 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2714115 2011/12/15 2011/12/17 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2714826 N/A 2011/12/15 FRANK MO

Final Volume of Train Rinse 2714839 N/A 2011/12/15 FRANK MO

Maxxam ID LY4142 Collected 2011/12/07

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2011/12/12

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2715660 2011/12/16 2011/12/16 LANG LE

Chromium on Filter by ICP ICP 2714113 2011/12/15 2011/12/17 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2714109 2011/12/15 2011/12/17 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2714115 2011/12/15 2011/12/17 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2714826 N/A 2011/12/15 FRANK MO

Final Volume of Train Rinse 2714839 N/A 2011/12/15 FRANK MO

Maxxam ID LY4142 D u p Collected 2011/12/07

Sample ID RUN 1-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2011/12/12

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Chromium on Filter by ICP ICP 2714113 2011/12/16 2011/12/17 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2714109 2011/12/15 2011/12/17 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2714115 2011/12/15 2011/12/17 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Maxxam ID LY4143 Collected 2011/12/08

Sample ID RUN 2-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2011/12/12

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2715660 2011/12/16 2011/12/16 LANG LE

Chromium on Filter by ICP ICP 2714113 2011/12/15 2011/12/17 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2714109 2011/12/15 2011/12/17 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2714115 2011/12/15 2011/12/17 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2714826 N/A 2011/12/15 FRANK MO

Final Volume of Train Rinse 2714839 N/A 2011/12/15 FRANK MO

Maxxam ID LY4143 D u p Collected 2011/12/08

Sample ID RUN 2-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2011/12/12

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2715660 2011/12/16 2011/12/16 LANG LE

Page 4 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B1J5560 Client Project #: 11-4190.00

Report Date: 2011/12/22 Site Location: JM DEFIANCE

Test Summary

Maxxam ID LY4144 Collected 2011/12/08

Sample ID RUN 3-M0061 Shipped

Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2011/12/12

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst

Hexavalent Chromium (M0061) IC/SPEC 2715660 2011/12/16 2011/12/16 LANG LE

Chromium on Filter by ICP ICP 2714113 2011/12/15 2011/12/17 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Impinger by ICP ICP 2714109 2011/12/15 2011/12/17 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Chromium in Train Rinse by ICP ICP 2714115 2011/12/15 2011/12/17 SUBAN KANAPATHIPPLLAI

Final Volume of KOH Impinger 2714826 N/A 2011/12/15 FRANK MO

Final Volume of Train Rinse 2714839 N/A 2011/12/15 FRANK MO

Page 5 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Maxxam Job #: B1J5560 Client Project #: 11-4190.00

Report Date: 2011/12/22 Site Location: JM DEFIANCE

GENERAL COMMENTS

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 6 of 8
BT Environmental Consulting

Attention: James K. Sharp 

Client Project #: 11-4190.00

P.O. #:

Site Location: JM DEFIANCE

Quality Assurance Report

Maxxam Job Number: GB1J5560

QA/QC Date

Batch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits

2714109 SUK Matrix Spike

(LY4142) Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 95 % 80 - 120

Matrix Spike DUP

(LY4142) Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 97 % 80 - 120

MS/MSD RPD Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 1.9 % 20

Spiked Blank Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 99 % 90 - 110

Spiked Blank DUP Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 100 % 90 - 110

RPD Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 1 % 20

Method Blank Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 0.3 U, MDL=0.3 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Back Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 NC % 20

2714113 SUK Matrix Spike

(LY4142) Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 106 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 106 % 90 - 110

Spiked Blank DUP Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 107 % 90 - 110

RPD Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 0.7 % 20

Method Blank Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 0.3 U, MDL=0.3 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Front Half Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 NC % 20

2714115 SUK Matrix Spike

(LY4142) Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 99 % 80 - 120

Matrix Spike DUP

(LY4142) Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 100 % 80 - 120

MS/MSD RPD Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 0.4 % 20

Spiked Blank Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 102 % 90 - 110

Spiked Blank DUP Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 103 % 90 - 110

RPD Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 0.6 % 20

Method Blank Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 0.3 U, MDL=0.3 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Rinse Chromium (Cr) 2011/12/17 NC % 20

2715660 LLE Matrix Spike

(LY4143) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2011/12/16 106 % 80 - 120

Spiked Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2011/12/16 100 % 90 - 110

Method Blank Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2011/12/16 0.03 U, MDL=0.03 ug

RPD -

Sample/Sample

Dup Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+) 2011/12/16 NC % 20

Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.

Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.

Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery.

Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

NC (RPD): The RPD was not calculated. The level of analyte detected in the parent sample and its duplicate was not sufficiently significant to permit a

reliable calculation.

Page 7 of 8
Validation Signature Page

Maxxam Job #: B1J5560

The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s).

FRANK MO, B.Sc., Inorganic Lab. Manager 

====================================================================

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of

ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Page 8 of 8