Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-66785; File No. SR-FICC-2012-01]

## I. Introduction

                    On February 14, 2012, the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (“FICC”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change SR-FICC-2012-01 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) [1]                                          and Rule 19b-4 [2]                                          thereunder. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 5, 2012.[3]                                          The Commission received no comment letters regarding the proposal. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is granting approval of the proposed rule change.                

## II. Description

                    The proposed rule change consists of modifications to Rule 19, Section 4 of the rules of the Government Securities Division (“GSD”) of FICC. The purpose of the rule change is to make technical corrections to GSD Rule 19 (Special Provisions For Brokered Repo Transactions), Section 4 (Calculations of Funds-Only Settlement Amounts for Repo Brokers) as described below. GSD Rule 19, Section 4 states that FICC may retain any amount of a Credit Forward Mark Adjustment Payment that is in excess of the Cap [4]                                          and that interest earned on such amount shall be paid to the Repo Broker on the subsequent business day. The second part of this sentence is incorrectly stated because FICC pays interest to those who were debited forward mark adjustment amounts not those who were credited such amounts. On the following day (i.e., the day after the broker received the Credit Forward Mark Adjustment Payment) when the broker is debited the interest for the use of funds it received as a credit, the broker will be debited the interest on the amount that it actually received as a credit (i.e., it will not be debited interest for the amount of Credit payment withheld above the Cap). The rule is also revised to state that Repo Brokers with more than one Segregated Repo Account must aggregate Debit Forward Mark Adjustments and Credit Forward Mark Adjustment Payments in those accounts for purposes of the Cap. The Repo Brokers currently comply with this correction and the revision reflects current practice.                

## III. Discussion

                    Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act [5]                                          directs the Commission to approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it finds that such proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to such organization. In particular, Section 17A(b)(3)(F) [6]                                          of the Act requires, among other things, that the rules of a clearing agency be designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and to assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the custody or control of such clearing agency or for which it is responsible. Because the proposed change would align FICC's rulebook with its practices and provide transparency in its processes, the Commission believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with FICC's obligations under the Act.                

## IV. Conclusion

On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.

*It is therefore ordered,*                     pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) [7]                                          of the Act, that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-FICC-2012-01) be, and hereby is, approved.[8] 

      ( print page 22828)    
                        For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.[9] 

Kevin M. O'Neill, 

Deputy Secretary .

# Footnotes

1.                             15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             17 CFR 240.19b-4.                    
        Back to Citation      

3.                             Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-66485 (February 28, 2012), 77 FR 13164 (March 5, 2012). In its filing with the Commission, FICC included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change. The text of these statements is incorporated into the discussion of the proposed rule change in Section II below.                    
        Back to Citation      

4.                             The GSD rules define “Cap” as any Debit Forward Mark Adjustment Payment or Credit Forward Mark Adjustment Payment up to a dollar amount, as determined by FICC from time to time, that is automatically collected from or paid to the Repo Broker, as applicable.                    
        Back to Citation      

5.                             15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).                    
        Back to Citation      

6.                             15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).                    
        Back to Citation      

7.                             15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).                    
        Back to Citation      

8.                             In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).                    
        Back to Citation      

9.                                 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).                        
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2012-9142 Filed 4-16-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P