alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10
- 14
- 00355
- CV WILLIAM M. WINDSOR, Appellant v. SAM ROUND, Appellee No. 10
- 14
- 00

___ - CV WILLIAM M. WINDSOR , Appellant v. SEAN D. FLEMING , Appellee

From the 40th District Court Ellis County, Texas Trial Court No. 88611

ORDER
William M. Windsor has filed a notice of appeal from an order that granted a motion to dismiss filed by Sean D. Fleming. The motion was based on the TexasWindsor v. Fleming Pag e 2

Citizens Participation Act (TCPA), generally referred to as the Texas Anti

- Slapp law. “Slapp” is an acronym for “strategic lawsuits against public participation.” Windsor had previously filed a notice of appeal of an order granting the Special Appearance of another defendant in the same suit, Sam Round. The appeal from the order granting the special ap pearance is docketed as 10

- 14

- 00355

- CV. Our first question is whether to file the appeal of the Anti

- Slapp dismissal in the same proceeding as the appeal of the special appearance. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 12 describes some of the duties of the appellate court clerk. Included in the rule is an extensive description of the procedure for assigning docket numbers to appeals. Rule 12.2(c) provides: Multiple Notices of Appeal.

– All notices of appeal filed in the same case must be given the same doc ket number.
T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 12.2(c). A literal application of the rule would potentially require both notices of appeal to be filed under the same number. Such a reading would require that same docket number be assigned to an appeal of the final judgment as had been assigned to an
interlocut ory appeal. This is because the interlocutory appeal and the appeal of the final judgment are both filed in the “same” case. However, it is common, if not the usual, practice for appellate court clerks to assign one docket number to the interlocutory a ppeal and an entirely new docket number to the appeal of a final judgment. Moreover, it would be unwieldy to have toWindsor v. Fleming Pag e 3

use a docket number for the appeal of the final judgment that had been previously used for an interlocutory appeal when the interlocutory appeal has been concluded and the file closed. The same problem would be present if a final judgment were reversed on appeal and remanded for a new trial if there were an appeal after the new trial on
remand. Thus, we decline a literal application of R ule 12.2(c) as it would yield an absurd result to construe and apply the term “same case” in this manner on these facts. Furthermore, to the extent necessary, we use Rule 2 to suspend Rule 12.2(c) for good cause as described herein and order a different p rocedure. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 2; 12.2(c). The Clerk is hereby ordered to docket William M. Windsor’s notice of appeal of the order granting Sean D. Fleming’s motion to dismiss as a new and separate appeal, styled William M. Windsor v. Sean D. Fleming as distinguished from docket number 10

- 14

- 00355

- CV, styled William M. Windsor v. Sam Round

.

PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Order issued delivered and filed December 18, 2014 Publish
Exhibit 12.1

OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES  Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

|                                                                                                                             |  | Fiscal Year Ended |        
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | -------
|
|
|Interest costs                                                                                                               |  | $                 | 121,271
|Guarantee of interest on ESOP debt                                                                                           |  |                   |       
|Interest capitalized during the period                                                                                       |  |                   |       
|Interest factor related to noncapitalized leases(a)                                                                          |  |                   | 112,552
|                                                                                                                             |  |                   |        
|Total fixed charges                                                                                                          |  | $                 | 233,823
|                                                                                                                             |  |                   |        
|Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes, minority interest, and cumulative effect of accounting changes |  | $                 | 337,527
|Undistributed (earnings) losses of less than 50% owned entities, net of distributions received                               |  |                   | (6,065 
|Total fixed charges                                                                                                          |  |                   | 233,823
|Less: Interest capitalized                                                                                                   |  |                   |       
|Guarantee of interest on
         ESOP debt                                                                                  |  |                   |       
|                                                                                                                             |  |                   |        
|Total earnings before fixed charges                                                                                          |  | $                 | 565,285
|                                                                                                                             |  |                   |        
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                                                           |  |                   | 2.42   
|Excess of fixed charges over earnings before fixed charges                                                                   |  | $                 |       

---

---



QuickLinks
FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

April 8, 2015

ABELACOSTA, CLERK

No. PDs-100-15& 101-15

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF TEXAS

OSMIN PERAZA, Appellant

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from Harris County

*****

STATE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY'S

MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL

*****

LISA C. McMINN

State Prosecuting Attorney

BarI.D.No.13803300

P.O.Box 13046

Austin, Texas 78711

information@spa.texas.gov

512/463-1660 (Telephone)

512/463-5724 (Fax)

pd-0100-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 4/7/2015 4:26:46 PM

Accepted 4/8/2015 8:27:05 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK

K^z

i$^
No. PDS-100-15& 101-15

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF TEXAS

OSMIN PERAZA, Appellant

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

*****

STATE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY'S

MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL

*****

Comes now the State ofTexas, by and through its State Prosecuting Attorney,

and respectfully submits to the Court its Motion to Substitute Counsel in the above

entitled and numbered cause.

The State's petition for discretionary review was filed by the Harris County

District Attorney, pursuant to Tex. Gov't Code § 42.005(b) (a district or county

attorney may assist the state prosecuting attorney in representing the state before the

court ofcriminal appeals). This Court granted the State's petition on March 25,2015,

and ordered the State's briefto be filed on or before April 9, 2015. The undersigned

and the Assistant Harris County District Attorney who filed the State's petition have
agreed that the State Prosecuting Attorney should file the State's brief and present

oral argument in this case.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, the State prays that its Motion to Substitute Counsel be granted

and that Lisa C. McMinn be substituted for Jessica Akins as counsel for the State.

Respectfully submitted,

Isi Lisa C. McMinn

LISA C. McMINN

State Prosecuting Attorney

Bar I.D. No. 13803300

P.O. Box 13046

Austin, Texas 78711

information@spa.texas.gov

512/463-1660 (Telephone)

512/463-5724 (Fax)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on this 7th day of April, 2015, the State's Motion

to substitute was served electronically on:

Jessica Akins

Assistant District Attorney

1201 Franklin, 13th Floor

Houston, Texas 77002

akins_jessica@dao.hctx.net

Jani Maselli Wood

Assistant Public Defender

1201 Franklin St, 13th Floor

Houston, Texas 77002

jani.maselli@pdo.hctx.net

/s/LisaC. McMinn

LISA C. McMINN

State Prosecuting Attorney
<TABLE>
                                                                                       EXHIBIT 11


                               BERGEN BRUNSWIG CORPORATION
                               ---------------------------

                            COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996,
                  (in thousands except for share and per share amounts)

<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                          Years Ended
                                                                         September 30,
                                                               -----------------------------------
                                                                   1996        1995        1994
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                            <C>          <C>        <C>    
DATA AS TO EARNINGS
        Net earnings applicable to common and
           common equivalent shares                                $73,533     $63,942    $56,120
                                                               ===================================


DATA AS TO NUMBER OF COMMON AND
     COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES:
     Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
        Class A Common Stock                                    39,979,250  39,588,670 38,215,314
        Class B Common Stock                                             -           -     40,675
     Shares of Class A Common Stock to be issued from assumed 
        conversion of remainder of Class B Common Stock                  -           -    346,900
     Common equivalent shares assuming issuance of shares
        represented by outstanding employees' stock options:
        Additional shares assumed to be issued                   1,673,606   1,314,239    506,751
        Reduction of such additional shares assuming
           proceeds invested in treasury stock (at average
           market prices during each year)                      (1,393,784) (1,101,955)  (425,865)
                                                               -----------------------------------
        Average number of common and common
           equivalent shares outstanding                        40,259,072  39,800,954 38,683,775
                                                               ===================================


EARNINGS PER COMMON AND COMMON
     EQUIVALENT SHARE OUTSTANDING:
        Net earnings                                              $   1.83    $   1.61   $   1.45
                                                              ===================================

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2GLOBALCASH ACCESS, INC.CERTIFICATION     I, Harry C. Hagerty, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Global Cash Access, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Dated: August 11, 2005 By: /s/ Harry C. Hagerty             Harry C. Hagerty
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

Third District Court of Appeal 

State of Florida 

Opinion filed February 28, 2024. 

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. 

________________ 

No. 3D23-1072 

Lower Tribunal No. 21-9053 

________________ 

Walter L. Wright, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

JPay LLC, et al., 

Appellees. 

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for 

Miami-Dade County, Beatrice Butchko, Judge. 

Walter L. Wright, in proper person.

Colodny Fass, James Guanciale, and Matthew C. Scarfone (Sunrise), 

for appellee JPay LLC.

Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY and MILLER, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

THOMAS DREW,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 517 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
**Exhibit 35.1**

**Servicer Compliance Statement of John Deere Capital Corporation**

​

I, Katrin Watkins, Assistant Secretary of John Deere Capital Corporation, state:

​

A review of John Deere Capital Corporation’s activities for the period from September 17, 2024 (the date of issuance of the John Deere Owner Trust 2024-C transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation AB) through October 27, 2024 (the “Reporting Period”) and of John Deere Capital Corporation’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 17, 2024 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables LLC and John Deere Owner Trust 2024-C has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, John Deere Capital Corporation has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

​

​

| ​                | ​                        | ​              |
|------------------------|--------------------------------|----------------------|
| Date: January 10, 2025 | John Deere Capital Corporation |
| ​                | ​                        | ​              |
| ​                | By:                            | */s/ Katrin Watkins* |
| ​                | ​                        | Katrin Watkins       |
| ​                | ​                        | Assistant Secretary  |
| ​                | ​                        | ​              |
| ​                | ​                        | ​              |
|                        | ​                        | ​              |

​

----
RICHARD DANIEL VAUGHN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-5766

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 14, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

William F. Stone, Judge.

Jeffrey E. Lewis, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Michael J. Titus, 

Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil 

Regional Counsel, Region One, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Giselle Denise Lylen, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, CLARK, and WETHERELL, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tony D.
Whitaker, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.





/s/Tony D.
      WhitakerTony
      D. WhitakerChairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerMay
      17, 2010
Appeal Reinstated; Order filed April 14, 2015. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00160-CV

____________

MISHA FERGUSON, Appellant

V.

THE ENCLAVE AT COPPERFIELD, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1057001

ORDER

On February 20, 2015, appellant filed a notice of appeal from a judgment 

signed January 21, 2015. On March 12, 2015, appellant filed a docketing statement 

and an affidavit of indigence in this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(h). When the 

affidavit of indigence is filed with the appellate court, the appellate court clerk 

must send a copy of the affidavit to the trial court clerk and court reporter and 

include a notice stating the deadline for filing a contest to the affidavit. Tex. R. 

App. P. 20.1(d)(2). Accordingly, on March 16, 2015, the clerk of this court sent 
2

appellant’s affidavit of indigence to appellee, the trial court clerk, and the court 

reporter, and notified them that any contest was required to be filed within 10 days. 

See id. On March 26, 2015, appellee filed a contest to appellant’s affidavit. 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1 provides that the appellate court 

may refer a contest of indigency to the trial court with instructions to hear evidence 

and grant the appropriate relief. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(h)(4). On April 2, 2015, this 

court abated the appeal and directed the trial court to hear and decide the contest 

and have a supplemental record filed containing the trial court’s ruling on the 

contest. On April 9, 2015, the requested record was filed. The record contains the 

trial court’s order signed April 6, 2015, denying the contest to appellant’s affidavit 

of inability to pay costs and ordering that appellant may proceed in forma pauperis. 

Therefore, we order the appeal REINSTATED. Appellant may proceed on 

appeal without the advance payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(i). We 

further order the that official court reporter, Laura M. Cutherell, is ordered to file 

the reporter’s record in this appeal on or before May 18, 2015, subject to any 

reasonable request for an extension of time that may be granted. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

TYREE DOCKERY,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 640 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 8, 2015

No. 04-15-00030-CV

David PERALTA,

Appellant

v.

MASSACHUSSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 333462

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF JURISDICTION. 

Costs of appeal are assessed against the party that incurred them. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.4.

It is so ORDERED on April 8, 2015.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of April, 2015.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of                the                Company. |
|--|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                               |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/              E. Eugene              Sharer                                     |   |   |        |
| E.                Eugene Sharer Interim                Principal Financial Officer |   |   |        |
|                                                                               |   |   |   |
| November                14, 2006                                                   |   |   |        |

----