alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jacksonville Electric Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. E. S. Light, Defendant in Error.

(Supreme Court of Florida, *En Banc,*

November 26, 1907).

Writ of Error to Circuit Court, Duval county, Rhydon M. Call, Judge.

Kay, Doggett & Smith, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for the defendant in error.

This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error. There was judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant takes writ of error. Dismissed on motion of counsel for plaintiff in error.
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Lexington Precision Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Michael A. LubinMichael A. Lubin
Chairman of the Board
(Co-Principal Executive Officer)
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J.A. FISCHER, D.C. KING, T.P. BELSKY

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

FAVIAN S. GOMEZ

LANCE CORPORAL (E-3), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201500015

GENERAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 2 October 2014.

Military Judge: LtCol D.M. Jones, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding General, 2d Marine Aircraft 

Wing, Parris Island, SC.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LTCol J.J. Murphy, 

USMC.

For Appellant: Maj Michael Berry, USMCR.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller, Esq.

9 April 2015

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

For the Court

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
Helvetia Asset Recovery, 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 13, 2015

No. 04-14-00569-CV

Burton KAHN,

Appellant

v.

HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY, INC.,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-18355

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

ORDER

 Appellant, who is pro se on appeal, has filed a motion requesting oral argument. We 

ORDER this motion carried with the case. The motion will be determined by the panel of this 

court to which the appeal is assigned.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, R. Clay Hulette, the Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

           (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| November 14, 2006 | /s/  R. Clay Hulette             |
|-------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|              |                                            |
|              | R. Clay Hulette                            |
|              | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

ROBERT T. SEIWELL, 

 Respondent 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 2151 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 

No. 185 DB 2014 

Attorney Registration No. 19026 

(Chester County) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 10th day of April, 2015, upon consideration of the 

Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board dated March 20, 

2015, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted pursuant 

to Pa.R.D.E. 215(g), and it is 

 ORDERED that Robert T. Seiwell is suspended on consent from the Bar of this 

Commonwealth for a period of two years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of 

Pa.R.D.E. 217.
0FFICIAL;N0fleeFSa®5M^MirR^mSAPFiA^^£TEXAr

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

OFFICIAL BUSINESS .g&ragmre <>

STATE OFTEXASV • PENALTY FORV ' 3/6/2015 ' PRIVATE USI* ^

JANSKY, DONALD RAY T

On this day, the application for^fl^ Writ.of Habeas

and presented to the Court.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Steven DeWayne Pruitt, Appellant

No. 06-14-00051-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 8th District Court of 

Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

1323451). Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss

and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Steven DeWayne Pruitt, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED APRIL 8, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Michael Dean, Appellant

No. 06-16-00149-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 5th District Court of 

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

15F0673-005). Opinion delivered by 

Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and 

Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed 

for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Michael Dean, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 25, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLAZG02000.L143000000.EQ0000.TAS:14X1109.241A]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of relocation.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the relocation of the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) Tucson Field Office (TFO) and the temporary closure of the office during the relocation.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brian B. Bellew, Field Manager, BLM Tucson Field Office, 12661 East Broadway, Tucson, Arizona 85748,  520-258-7200. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.

# DATES:

Effective April 13, 2012, the relocation begins, and the new office opens Monday, April 16, 2012.

# ADDRESSES:

The new BLM Tucson Field Office address will be 3201 East Universal Way, Tucson, Arizona 85756.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Effective at the close of business on  April 12, 2012, the BLM TFO will close for the purpose of relocating. The Field Office provides access to and inspection of the official Public Records of the Federal government, and the serialized case files of active land, mineral, and grazing transactions for the TFO area. The office will reopen at its new address at 3201 East Universal Way, Tucson, Arizona 85756, at 8 a.m. on Monday, April 16, 2012. The BLM TFO telephone number will remain the same (520-258-7200). Directions to the new BLM TFO office: From I-10 and Valencia Road Exit #267, go west 2.1 miles, then turn left onto South Lisa Frank Avenue, and continue approximately 0.1 mile to East Universal Way, then turn right and proceed 0.1 mile to the new address.

Raymond Suazo,

State Director.

[FR Doc. 2012-9402 Filed 4-18-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4130-32-P
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Douglas MacLeod, certify that:

 

1.           Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered bythis report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2023-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.          Basedon my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.          Based on my knowledge,all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.          Iam responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted inpreparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.          All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 ofRegulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosedin this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A.

 

 

 

 

March 27, 2024
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    Home





    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos

    Coronavirus Disease 2019





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    CSAF Reading List    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    2015 CSAF Reading List

    2014 CSAF Reading List

    2013 CSAF Reading List

    2012 CSAF Reading List

    2011 CSAF Reading List

    2010 CSAF Reading List

    2009 CSAF Reading List

    2008 CSAF Reading List

    2007 CSAF Reading List

    2006 CSAF Reading List

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Desert Storm 25th Anniversary

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2020

    Focus on Priorities





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers





    Contact Us  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (0.05 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR Act
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15I0156. CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY v. CITY OF STOCKBRIDGE.

Applicant City of Stockbridge Downtown Development Authority has filed a

motion to withdraw this application for interlocutory appeal. The motion is hereby

GRANTED, and this application is deemed WITHDRAWN.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/01/2015

April 01, 2015
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION

 

I, **Harpreet S. Sangha**, certify that:

(1)        I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended February 29, 2008 of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc.;

(2)        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)        The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)        Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)        The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:    April 21, 2008.
*"Harpreet S. Sangha"*
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 91 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 91

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 5, 2020

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
for a ceremony to present the Congressional Gold Medal collectively to 
             the Chinese-American veterans of World War II.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY TO PRESENT 
              CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL TO CHINESE-AMERICAN VETERANS OF 
              WORLD WAR II.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used on April

              

 29, 2020, for a ceremony to present the Congressional Gold Medal 
collectively to the Chinese-American veterans of World War II, in 
recognition of their dedicated service during World War II.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 4, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
391 A.2d 695

#### Commonwealth v. Perry, Appellant.

Submitted September 12, 1977.

Patrick J. Flannery, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Thomas J. Glenn, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, and Patrick J. Toole, Jr., District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

*624SPAETH, J., concurred in the result.

JACOBS, P. J., dissented.

HOFFMAN, J., dissented based on *Commonwealth v. Riggins,*474 Pa. 115, 377 A.2d 140 (1977).

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

Au gust 11, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00434

- CV

Roger WIATREK

, Appellant

v.

Laura WIATREK

, Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 12

- 0756

- CVW The Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On August 2, 2017, we directed appellant to show cause in writing that either the filing fee has been paid or that appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the fi ling fee. The filing fee has since been paid. Accordingly, we ORDER that the reporter’s record be filed on or before 10 days from the date of this order.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereu nto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 11th day of August, 2017

.

___________________________________ Luz Estrada Chief Deputy Clerk