alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CCC COMMODITY INVENTORY

As of March 31, 2021

(Million Units Except as Noted) OUTSTANDING UNDER LOAN CCC-OWNED

CY 2019 CY 2020 INVENTORY 2/

(Actual Units)

BUTTER (LB) - - 0.0

CHEESE (LB) - - 0.0

NONFAT DRY MILK (LB) - - 0.0

BARLEY (BU) 0.1 3.9 0.0

CORN (BU) 8.1 372.4 0.0

OATS (BU) 0.1 0.7 0.0

SORGHUM (BU) 0.0 0.2 0.0

SOYBEANS (BU) 1.0 40.8 0.0

WHEAT (BU) 0.4 19.4 0.0

RICE (CWT) 0.0 26.7 0.0

REFINED SUGAR (Mil. Lbs.) 75.0 779.5 0.0

 IN-PROCESS BEET 0.0 1,314.0 0.0

RAW CANE SUGAR (Mil. Lbs.) 0.0 1,180.5 0.0

 IN-PROCESS CANE 0.0 0.0 0.0

HONEY (Mil. Lbs.) 0.0 5.9 0.0

PEANUTS (tons) 0.0 1,425,800.0 0.00

CANOLA SEED (CWT) 1/ 14.0 268.0 0.0

CRAMBE (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0

FLAXSEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 8.0 0.0

MUSTARD SEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 3.0 0.0

RAPESEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0

SAFFLOWER SEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0

SESAME SEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0

SUNFLOWER SEED (OIL) (CWT) 1/ 0.0 492.0 0.0

SUNFLOWER SEED (Other) (CWT) 1/ 2.0 48.0 0.0

DRY PEAS (CWT) 1/ 15.0 399.0 0.0

LENTILS (CWT) 1/ 0.0 126.0 0.0

CHICKPEAS (CWT) 1/ 28.0 62.0 0.0

UPLAND COTTON (BALE) 2,100.0 3,093,700.0 0.0

ELS COTTON (BALE) 2,100.0 150,300.0 0.0

1/ Minor Oilseeds & Pulses are in thousand units.

2/ CCC acquired 2019 Crop Year Upland (if not specified) and ELS cotton as a result of the following months' 

forfeited Marketing Assistance Loans:

12 bales from August 2020; 59 bales from September 2020; 120 bales from October; 135 Upland and 351 ELS bales 

from November; 876 Upland and 18 ELS bales from December; 48 bales from January maturing loans. 

Following were multiple invitations that sold 12 bales in September; 59 bales in October; 77 bales in November;

 70 Upland bales and 351 ELS bales in December; 984 Upland bales and 18 ELS bales in January; and 35 bales

in March. 

In total, there were 0 bales of cotton in inventory on March 31, 2021.

CCC also acquired 2019 Crop Year peanuts as a result of the following months' forfeited Marketing Assistance 

Loans:

20.55 tons from September 2020, 39.77 tons from October 2020, and 7.19 tons from January. 

Total CCC peanut forfeitures for Crop Year 2019 were 60.32 tons. CCC sold 20.55 tons from 

Invitation 20, 39.77 tons from Invitation 21, and 7.19 tons from Invitation 22. 

This brought the total CCC peanut inventory to 0.00 tons as of March 31, 2021. 

Report Completed: May 17, 2021
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1307. BRUCE M. GREER v. THE STATE.

In 2000, Bruce Greer was convicted of armed robbery, aggravated assault, and

other crimes. We affirmed his convictions in an unpublished opinion. See Greer v.

State, Case No. A03A0526 (decided March 19, 2003).1In September 2014, Greer

filed a motion to vacate a void sentence. The trial court denied his motion, and Greer

appeals. We, however, lack jurisdiction. 

An appeal may lie from an order denying a motion to vacate a void sentence

if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact, void or illegal.

See Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216 n.1 (686 SE2d 786) (2009); Burg v. State, 297 Ga.

App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). A sentence is void only if it imposes

punishment that the law does not allow. Von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 572 (2)

(748 SE2d 446) (2013). In his motion, Greer argued that the prosecutor was biased

against him, suppressed exculpatory evidence, and used perjured testimony.

2 These

1 Greer later filed an extraordinary motion for new trial, which the trial court

denied. He sought discretionary review of that ruling, but we denied his application. 

See Greer v. State, Application No. A09D0332 (decided May 11, 2009). Greer then

filed a “Motion to Vacate And/Or Set Aside Judgment Obtained By Perjury,” which

the trial court also denied. Greer appealed directly to this Court, but we dismissed

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Greer v. State, Case No. A14A1029

(dismissed March 21, 2014).

2 Greer also briefly challenged the validity of a 1997 probation revocation. But

a timely application for discretionary appeal is required to appeal an order whose

underlying subject matter isthe revocation of probation. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (5);

March 23, 2015
are challenges to the validity of his convictions, not his sentence, and they do not

assert grounds upon which his sentence can be declared void. See Brown v. State,

297 Ga. App. 738 (678 SE2d 172) (2009). Because Greer did not argue that his

sentence exceedsthe statutory maximum for his offenses, he did not raise a colorable

void sentence argument. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

White v. State, 233 Ga. App. 873 (505 SE2d 228) (1998).

03/23/2015
**Certifications**

 

 

I, Paul Vanderslice, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reportson Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by thisreport on Form 10-K, of BMO 2023-C5 Mortgage Trust (the “Exchange Act PeriodicReports”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports,taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicingand other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliancestatement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, andexcept as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicers havefulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all materialrespects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included asan exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably reliedon information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: MidlandLoan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; Rialto CapitalAdvisors, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; ComputershareTrust Company, National Association; 3650 REIT LoanServicing LLC; LNR Partners, LLC; ArgenticServices Company LP; BellOak, LLC; and KeyBank National Association.

 

 

Date: March 28, 2024

 

/s/ PaulVanderslice                                                   

Paul Vanderslice

Chief Executive Officer, BMO Commercial Mortgage SecuritiesLLC

(senior officer in charge of securitization of thedepositor)
Order entered April 6, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00029-CV

J.A. GREEN DEVELOPMENT CORP., JAGI, INC., AND JAGI VERDE LLC, Appellants

V.

GRANT THORNTON, LLP, JAMIE B. FOWLER, AND AKIN GUMP STRAUSS 

HAUER & FELD LLP, Appellees

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-00312

ORDER

Before the Court are Kevin M. Dinan and Timothy J. Sullivan, Jr.’s sworn motions to 

appear pro hac vice on behalf of appellee Grant Thornton, LLP. We GRANT the motions and 

DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to add Mr. Dinan and Mr. Sullivan as counsel pro hac vice. 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135799 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135799 

 COA: 272631 

Wayne CC: 06-004368-02

DUQUIL DION LOVE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 18, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0421 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2008 

 Clerk
# Table 7

# Sheet2

# Sheet3
EXHIBIT 32.2
GLOBAL CASH ACCESS, INC.
CERTIFICATION
In connection with the periodic report of Global Cash Access, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), I, Harry C. Hagerty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of thedate hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,that to the best of my knowledge:
 (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated.        Dated: May 13, 2005 By:  /s/ Harry C. Hagerty    Harry C. Hagerty    Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CelaneseHoldings LLC (the "Company") on Form10-Q for the period ending June  30, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, David N. Weidman,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|          |                                                                                                                     |
|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.  | The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|          |                                                                                                                                                    |
|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.  | The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

Date: August 12, 2005

/s/ David N. WeidmanDavidN. WeidmanPresident and Chief ExecutiveOfficer

----
-88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

30 32 34 36 38 40 42


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 05/31 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.48 N 77.37 WMeters AGL
Order entered January 10, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 12 - 01583 - CV EDWARD C. NEWBERRY, Appellant V. CLAUDIA J. NEWBERRY, Appellee On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 06 - 0752 

### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s December 31, 2012 motion to dismiss the appeal

. In the motion, appellant states the parties have reached an agreement to compromise and settle their differences in this appeal. We GRANT app ellant’s motion, and pursuant to his request, we ABATE this appeal to permit the trial court to effectuate the parties’ agreement. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)(2)(C). The appeal will be reinstated in FORTY - FIVE DAYS or when the Court receives a motion to dismiss confirming the trial court has effectuated the parties’ agreement, whichever is first.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-12241

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00591-RAL-AEP-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NABA RAHEEM LEWIS, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(April 9, 2015)

Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 14-12241 Date Filed: 04/09/2015 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Meghan Collins, counsel for Naba Raheem Lewis, has moved to withdraw 

from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record 

reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. 

Because our review reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to 

withdraw is GRANTED, and Lewis’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. 

Case: 14-12241 Date Filed: 04/09/2015 Page: 2 of 2
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of--

Vertex Construction & Engineering 

Under Contract No. H92236-13-P-4956 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59645 

Mr. Hedayatullah Zaheb 

CEO/President 

Lt Col James H. Kennedy III, USAF 

Air Force Chief Trial Attorney 

Erika L. Whelan Retta, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 9 April 2015 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true "copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59645, Appeal of Vertex 

Construction & Engineering, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
District of Columbia 

Court of Appeals 

No. 13-AA-0700

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TAXICAB COMMISSION,

Petitioner,

v. TAXI-00004-13 

SHARANJIT SINGH,

Respondent.

BEFORE: McLeese and Thompson, Associate Judges; and Pryor, Senior 

Judge.

ORDER

On consideration of the motion filed by the District of Columbia Office of 

Administrative Hearings requesting that this court publish this its memorandum opinion 

and judgment, no opposition having been filed, and it further appearing that the mandate 

issued on March 4, 2015, it is

ORDERED that the Clerk shall recall the mandate issued on March 4, 2015. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to publish the memorandum opinion and 

judgment is granted, and the Clerk issue the attached opinion forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Copies to:

Richard C. Welch, Esq. Jamarle Thomas

1920 L Street, NW – Suite 400 Paralegal Specialist

Washington, DC 20036 Office of Administrative Hearings

Rachel Lukens, Esq. Todd S. Kim, Esq.

Supervisory Attorney-Advisor Solicitor General – DC 

Office of Administrative Hearings
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATIONS








I, Jason C. Behnke, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2023-C (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.





Date:  March 20, 2024


/s/ Jason C. BehnkeJason C. BehnkeVice President - Assistant TreasurerFord Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer(senior officer in charge of servicing function)
Order entered April 9, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00037-CR

JOHN KENNETH WEEKLEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-0955995-H

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On February 18, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding appellant’s 

motion to dismiss appointed counsel and proceed pro se. The trial court conducted a hearing and 

advised appellant of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation. Appellant signed a 

document stating he was waiving his right to be represented by counsel.

Accordingly, we GRANT appellant’s February 17, 2015 motion to dismiss counsel and 

proceed pro se. We DIRECT the Clerk to remove Catherine Bernhard as appellant’s appointed 

attorney of record and to show that appellant is representing himself on this appeal.

No hearing was conducted on appellant’s motion for post-conviction DNA testing. 

Further, the record of the hearing on appellant’s motion to dismiss counsel showed that Ms. 
Bernhard had already given appellant part of the record and was going to provide him a copy of 

the supplemental clerk’s record.

We GRANT appellant’s April 6, 2015 motion to extend time to file his brief only to the 

extent that we ORDER appellant to file his brief by MONDAY, JUNE 8, 2015. We remind 

appellant that pro se appellants are held to the same standards as licensed attorneys and that he 

will be required to comply with all applicable laws and rules of procedure. See Johnson v. State, 

760 S.W.2d 277, 279 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); Williams v. State, 549 S.W.2d 183, 187 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1977). If appellant’s brief is not filed by the date specified, the Court will, without

further notice, order the appeal submitted without briefs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b); Lott v. 

State, 874 S.W.2d 687 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994).

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first-class mail, to John Kenneth 

Weekley, BIN 15013405, Dallas County Jail, P.O. Box 660334, Dallas, Texas 75266-0334.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to 

Catherine Bernhard and the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.23

                                 vFINANCE, INC.
                               3010 Military Trail
                                    Suite 300
                            Boca Raton, Florida 33431

March 4, 2002


SBI Investments (USA) Inc.
c/o Billy Cheung
4/F Hendley Building
5 Queen's Road
Central Hong Kong

         Re:      Note Purchase Agreement between SBI Investments (USA) Inc.
                  (formerly known as Best Finance Investments Limited) ("SBI")
                  and vFinance, Inc.

Gentlemen:

         Reference is made to that certain Note Purchase Agreement (the
"Agreement") dated as of November 28, 2001 by and between vFinance, Inc. (the
"Company") and SBI Investments (USA) Inc. (formerly known as Best Finance
Investments Limited) ("SBI"), as amended by four letter agreements dated
November 30, December 14, December 28, 2001 and January 11, 2002 (collectively,
the "Letter Agreements") executed by the Company and SBI. Pursuant to the
Agreement and the Letter Agreements, SBI has loaned to the Company a total of
$975,000. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the
meanings ascribed to such capitalized terms in the Agreement and the Letter
Agreements.

         We propose to modify the Agreement and the Letter Agreements as set
forth herein. If SBI is in agreement with our proposed modifications, an
authorized representative of SBI should sign and date a copy of this letter in
the space provided below and return the signed copy of the letter to the
undersigned.

         1. The Company and SBI agree that Paragraph 4. g. of the Agreement
between the Company and SBI shall be amended to eliminate any reference to
permitting Shelly Singhal to work for SBI. The Company and SBI also agree that
Paragraph 4. g. shall be further amended to provide that as long as Shelly
Singhal is registered with the NASD as an employee of the Company, he shall not
be permitted to work for or be employed by SBI or any affiliate thereof other
than the Company.



<PAGE>



         2. All other provisions of the Agreement and the Letter Agreements are
incorporated herein by reference.

                                       Sincerely,

                                       vFINANCE, INC.



                                       By: /s/ Leonard J. Sokolow
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Leonard J. Sokolow
                                           Title: President and CEO

Agreed and Accepted:

SBI INVESTMENTS (USA) INC.


By: /s/ Wong Sin Just
    --------------------------
Name:  Wong Sin Just
Title: Director





                                      -2-
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 23, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 23, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0289. CHRISTOPHER M. HUNT, SR., et al. v. GWINNETT COUNTY

COMMISSIONERS.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

14A03838