alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 22755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9299]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice of Meeting of the Broadcasting Board 
of Governors

DATE AND TIME: Friday, April 20, 2012, 10 a.m.

PLACE: Office of Cuba Broadcasting, 4201 NW. 77th Ave., Miami, FL 
33166.

SUMMARY: The Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) will be meeting at 
the time and location listed above. At the meeting, the BBG will 
consider a resolution to thank Ambassador Kathleen Stephens for her 
service on the Board as the President's nominee to be Under Secretary 
has received Senate confirmation. The BBG will receive a status report 
on the consolidation transaction plan for BBG-sponsored grantees. The 
BBG will receive and consider a progress report from the Strategy and 
Budget Committee on the implementation of the BBG strategy and a report 
from the Governance Committee regarding proposed amendments to BBG By-
Laws as well as the results of March 9 Governance Committee Meeting on 
employee morale and contractor issues. The BBG will receive an Asia 
trip report and a budget update. The BBG will receive reports from the 
International Broadcasting Bureau Director, the VOA Director, the 
Office of Cuba Broadcasting Director, and the Presidents of Radio Free 
Europe/Radio Liberty, Radio Free Asia, and the Middle East Broadcasting 
Networks.
    The public may attend this meeting as seating capacity allows. 
Member of the public seeking to attend the meeting in person must 
register at http://bbg.eventbrite.com/by April 17. For more 
information, please contact BBG Public Affairs at (202) 203-4400; 
Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#75050017141313351717125b121a03"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="29595c4b484f4f694b4b4e074e465f">[email protected]</span></a>. This meeting is also available for public 
observation via streamed webcast, both live and on-demand, on the BBG's 
public Web site at www.bbg.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Paul Kollmer-Dorsey at (202) 203-4545.

Paul Kollmer-Dorsey,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012-9299 Filed 4-13-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8610-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
How to Register for an USDA eAuthentication Account for the ePACA Portal

New and current PACA license 

holders must have an USDA 

eAuthentication (eAuth) account to 

log in to the ePACA Portal. Register 

for an eAuth account by going to the 

eAuth registration page by clicking 

on the link in the “Online PACA 

Services” tab as shown.

https://www.ams.usda.gov/rulesregulations/paca/epacaportal

On the Account Registration page 

click on Customer. 

On the next screen, enter your email 

address.
You will then be sent an email to the 

address you entered.

Go to the email you received and click 

on “Continue Registration”.

In the newly opened window fill out 

your first, middle and last name. You 

must also enter a password which must 

be 12 characters long and not a 

commonly used password. Your user 

ID is your email address.
You may now log into the PACA 

portal with your user ID (email) and 

password.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22773-22774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9121]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[ Docket No. RP12-318-001]


Texas Eastern Transmission, L.P.; Notice of Response

    Take notice that on March 19, 2012, pursuant to the February 16, 
2012 order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in the above-
captioned proceeding Texas Eastern Transmission, LP (Texas Eastern) 
submits its response to show cause why it should not be required to 
file revisions to its tariff concerning reservation charge credits.
    Any party desiring to file responses to Texas Eastern's March 19, 
2012 submission must do so on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on April 
18, 2012.

[[Page 22774]]

    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the 
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the 
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#094f4c5b4a46676560676c5a7c7979667b7d496f6c7b6a276e667f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d4929186979bbab8bdbab187a1a4a4bba6a094b2b1a6b7fab3bba2">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern time on Wednesday, April 18, 2012.

    Dated: April 10, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9121 Filed 4-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2004094EN.01003701.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/37

---

Removal from the register of Case C-273/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 94/106)

By order of 17 February 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case C-273/03: Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

---

(1)  OJ C 184 of 2.08.2003.

1

---
# C_2004106EN.01006403.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/64

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 9 February 2004

in Case T-120/03 Synopharm G,bH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

(2004/C 106/131)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-120/03 between Synopharm GmbH & Co. KG, represented by G. Hodapp, lawyer, and the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: G. Schneider and U. Pfleghar), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) being Pentafarma – Sociedad Técnico-Medicinal Lda, represented by J. Pereira da Cruz, lawyer – Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 January 2003 (Case R 44/2002-3) relating to the opposition proceedings between Synopharm GmbH & Co. KG and Pentafarma – Sociedad Técnico-Medicinal Lda – the Court of first instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and N.J. Forwood, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 9 February 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | There is no need to rule on the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to rule on the action;

| 2. | The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and each pay half of those incurred by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and each pay half of those incurred by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ 2003 C 171.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Frederik Warnaars,
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Director of Aurelio Resource Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Aurelio Resource Corporation for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2006 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Aurelio Resource Corporation.

Dated: October 23, 2006

/s/ Frederik Warnaars Frederik
Warnaars

President, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Executive and Principal
Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been provided to Aurelio Resource Corporation and will be retained by
Aurelio Resource Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



---
### November 2, 2009

Dear Owner/Resident: A Lead Based Paint (LBP) assessment was recently performed on your property by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as part of the Omaha Lead Superfund Site investigation. The purpose of this assessment is todetermine whether a significant quantity of lead based paint is present on the exterior surfaceof structures, where deteriorating paint conditions (peeling, flaking, cracking, etc.) existthat might increase lead concentrations in the yard above acceptable levels.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the EPA Public Information Center at (402) 731-3045.
Sincerely,

Steve M Langum As requested, enclosed are the LBP assess ment sheets for 2130 S 33 ST along with a LBP Fact Sheet. The EPA is currently developing paint s tabilization eligibility criteria and at this time can not identify which homes will ultimately b e eligible for EPA-funded paint stabilization. At present, paint stabilization is being offered at only those households with the most severe LPB problems, particularly where children under the age of 7 reside. The EPA stresses the importance of maintaining painted surf aces where any amount of LBP is present. The LBP Fact Sheet provides information pertaining to the EPA’s Exterior LBP Response Program. Once the eligibility criterion is finalized (and if your property qualifies) a representative from EPA or the Omaha Lead Hazard Control Program (LHCP) will contact you to arrange for paint stabilization at your property

. Exposure to lead contamination can advers ely affect the development and behavior of young children. If you have children less than seven years of age living in your home, we strongly recommend that you contact your doctor or the Douglas County Health Department at (402) 444-7825 and arrange to have their blood tested.

Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp. 6601 CollegeBlvd. Overland Park, KS 66211 USA Telephone: 913-4 58-2900

### Omaha Lead Site LBP Assessment LEGEND: H 

## - N 

## - P 

## - 01 

## - 17969 1 LBVID Number 

# 1 1 I

# I Sample Number L-Material P = Paint Side of Structure N = North S = South E = East W = West --Structure Type H = House G = Garage S = Shed F = Fence 

# I Samples Analyzed 

### XRF Unit: 

# *

Book: Date: Time: 

# 92aa staff: 

# pE /LL Sample Number Lead Loading StructureIFeature Substrate Color Deteriorated (Window, siding, porch, etc.) (Wood, concrete, etc.) Area

### Omaha Lead Site Address: 21 30 S 33 ST 

### Site Sketch
I ALT 

### LBP Assessment Phone:L!! - _- -. - -- I North Arrow 

### A

I 1 Plan View 

## - Indicate number of stories and perimeter dimensions of structure Indicate reuions of deterioration and describe
Document

Exhibit 10.1

FIRST AMENDMENT TO
MATADOR RESOURCES COMPANY
2019 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN


    WHEREAS, Matador Resources Company, a Texas corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Matador Resources Company 2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9 of the Plan, the Board may, subject to the approval of the Company’s shareholders, amend the Plan, among other things, to increase the number of shares of Common Stock available for Awards under the Plan.


NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to its authority under Section 9 of the Plan, the Board hereby amends the Plan as follows, effective as of April 21, 2022 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), subject to the approval of the Company’s shareholders:


    1.    Section 5.1 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


(a)    Number Available for Awards. Subject to adjustment as provided in Articles 11 and 12, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be delivered pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan is 6,950,000 shares, of which 100% may be delivered pursuant to Incentive Stock Options, plus the number of shares of Common Stock remaining available for issuance under the Prior Plan on the Effective Date, plus the number of shares of Common Stock subject to any award outstanding under the Prior Plan as of the Effective Date that after the Effective Date is not issued because such award is forfeited, terminates, expires or otherwise lapses without being exercised (to the extent applicable), or is settled in cash. Subject to adjustment pursuant to Articles 11 and 12, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which Stock Options or SARs may be granted to an Executive Officer during any calendar year is 500,000 shares of Common Stock. Shares to be issued may be made available from authorized but unissued Common Stock, Common Stock held by the Company in its treasury or Common Stock purchased by the Company on the open market or otherwise. During the term of this Plan, the Company will at all times reserve and keep available the number of shares of Common Stock that shall be sufficient to satisfy the requirements of this Plan. 


    2.    This First Amendment to the Plan shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas without regard to its conflict of laws principles.


3.    All capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.


[Signature Page Follows]









    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this First Amendment to Matador Resources Company 2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan as of the Amendment Effective Date.




MATADOR RESOURCES COMPANY






By: /s/ Craig N. Adams    
Name: Craig N. Adams
Title:   EVP & COO
#### Dale Lewis ROY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-77-251.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Oct. 24, 1979.

*227Larry A. Gullekson, Frasier & Frasier, Tulsa, for appellant.

Larry Derryberry, Atty. Gen., Bill J. Bruce, Asst. Atty. Gen., Carol Elaine Alexander, Legal Intern, for appellee.

OPINION

BRETT, Judge:

The appellant, Dale Lewis Roy, was charged with Burglary in the First Degree in violation of 21 O.S.1971, § 1431, in Tulsa County District Court Case No. CRF-76-1958. A jury convicted him and set punishment at seven (7) years’ imprisonment.

At about 2:00 a. m., the complaining witness was inside his apartment arguing through a window with the appellant, who was on the lawn outside the apartment. The appellant struck at the complaining witness with his fist and, intentionally or not, knocked off the screen. The appellant then entered the apartment through the screenless window and beat up the complaining witness.

Unquestionably, there was sufficient evidence to have gone to the jury on an assault charge had the appellant been charged with assault. However, there was not sufficient evidence to go to the jury on a first degree burglary charge. Title 21 O.S.1971, § 1431, provides:

> “Every person who breaks into and enters in the night time the dwelling house of another, in which there is at the time some human being, with intent to commit some crime therein, . .:

> ********

> “3. ... is guilty of burglary in the first degree.” (Emphasis added)

The breaking and entering in this case were not the sort contemplated by the Legislature in this statute, but were concomitant with the physical attack on the complaining witness. The jury should have been directed to return a verdict of not guilty.

Therefore, we need not reach any other of the appellant’s propositions of error, and the case is *REVERSED*and *REMANDED*to the trial court with instructions to *DISMISS.*

CORNISH, P. J., and BUSSEY, J., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0606

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER I TOULOUSE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel of 

record, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant and Appellant in 

this matter shall file a response to this motion within thirty (30) days of 

the date of this Order. The response must be served upon all counsel of 

record, including the Attorney General, the County Attorney, and the 

Appellate Defender Division’s Office.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give 

notice of this Order by mail to all counsel of record and to the Defendant

and Appellant at his last known address.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 3 2022

01/03/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0606
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 20, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-41140

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTONIO MORA-GARIBAY,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-02-CR-243-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Antonio Mora-Garibay appeals his guilty-plea conviction and

sentence for being found in the United States, without

permission, following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326. Mora-Garibay concedes that his appellate arguments are

foreclosed. He nevertheless raises two issues to preserve them

for possible en banc or Supreme Court review. 

Mora-Garibay argues that the district court erred in

determining that his prior state felony conviction for possession
No. 02-41140

-2-

of cocaine was a “drug trafficking crime” under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1101(a)(43)(B) and thus an “aggravated felony” which warranted

an eight-level increase in his base offense level under U.S.S.G.

§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(C)(2001) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). Mora-Garibay’s

argument regarding the definitions of “drug trafficking crime”

and “aggravated felony” is foreclosed by United States v.

Caicedo-Cuero, 312 F.3d 697, 706-11 (5th Cir. 2002), cert.

denied, 123 S. Ct. 1948 (2003). The district court did not err

in sentencing Mora-Garibay under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C)(2001)

and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). 

Mora-Garibay also argues, for the first time on appeal, that

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional because it treats a prior

conviction for a felony or aggravated felony as a sentencing

factor and not as an element of the offense. Mora-Garibay’s

argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523

U.S. 224, 235, 239-47 (1998). Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S.

466, 489-90 (2000), did not overrule that decision. See United

States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). Thus, the

district court did not err in sentencing Mora-Garibay under

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The motion

of the Government for summary affirmance is GRANTED.
**Exhibit 32.2**
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of ZAGG Incorporated, (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brandon T. O’Brien,
        Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
        knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15
        (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 **/s/****BRANDON T. O’BRIEN**Brandon
                  T. O’BrienChief
                  Financial OfficerMay
                  15, 2008
p130050.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0050

Focus Ready Draft 11/19/2012

ENGINEER: Choudhary \ JAS

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

 

OTHER USES:

 

 

 

 

Page 1
p130050.eng

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SAT (concerns) (11/06/2012):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Ecotox Related Cases: 

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P1B1T2 .

Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1 ppb.)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

Page 2
p130050.eng

Page 3
p130050.eng

 

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0050

 

 

Page 4
p130050.eng

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0050

 

Page 5
p130050.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0050

 

Page 6
p130050.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0050

Page 7
p130050.eng

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 8
p130050.eng

Page 9