alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7185

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SHAUN A. BROOKS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-00-7-2, CA-02-22-2)

Submitted: October 9, 2003 Decided: October 21, 2003

Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shaun A. Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Sherry L. Muncy, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia; Paul Thomas

Camilletti, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Shaun A. Brooks seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. Brooks cannot appeal

this order unless a circuit judge or justice issues a certificate

of appealability, and a certificate of appealability will not issue

absent a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A habeas appellant meets

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find

that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any

dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, ,

123 S. Ct. 1029, 1039 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied,

534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and

conclude Brooks has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 53 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT COM4 MEMORATING 400TH ANNIVERSARY OF AR5 RIVAL OF FIRST AFRICAN SLAVES. 

6 Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is 

7 authorized to be used on September 9, 2019, for an event 
2 

•HCON 53 EH 

1 to commemorate the 400th anniversary of the arrival of 

2 the first African slaves to the territory that would become 

3 the United States. Physical preparations for the ceremony 

4 shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as 

5 the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 53 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall for an 

tory that would become the United States. the arrival of the first African slaves to the terrievent to commemorate the 400th anniversary of
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wise Metals Group LLC (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kenneth Stastny, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 4, 2008



By:

/s/ Kenneth StastnyKenneth StastnyChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ABC Funding, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Harold Barson, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

  1.      The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of
          operations of the Company.


/s/ Harold Barson
Harold Barson
Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
November 22, 2005
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1089 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that gain or loss 

on the sale or exchange of certain coins or bullion is exempt from recognition. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2019 

Mr. MOONEY of West Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

that gain or loss on the sale or exchange of certain 

coins or bullion is exempt from recognition. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Monetary Metals Tax 

5 Neutrality Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM RECOGNITION OF GAIN OR LOSS 

7 FROM SALE OF CERTAIN COINS OR BULLION. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter O of chapter 1 of the 

9 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting 

10 after part IV the following new part: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1089 IH

1 ‘‘PART V—SALE OF CERTAIN COINS OR BULLION 

‘‘Sec. 1071. Sale of certain coins or bullion. 

2 ‘‘SEC. 1071. SALE OF CERTAIN COINS OR BULLION. 

3 ‘‘No gain or loss shall be recognized on the sale or 

4 exchange of— 

5 ‘‘(1) gold, silver, platinum, or palladium coins 

6 minted and issued by the Secretary at any time, or 

7 ‘‘(2) refined gold or silver bullion, coins, bars, 

8 rounds, or ingots which are valued primarily based 

9 on their metal content and not their form.’’. 

10 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of parts for 

11 subchapter O of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by 

12 inserting after the item relating to part IV the following 

13 new item: 

‘‘PART V. SALE OF CERTAIN COINS OR BULLION’’. 

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to sales or exchanges after Decem16 ber 31, 2019. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
391 A.2d 703

#### Commonwealth v. Wannemacher, Appellant.

Submitted June 13, 1977.

No appearance entered nor brief submitted for appellant; William T. Nicholas, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Order affirmed.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tony D. Whitaker, the Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

|/s/Tony D. Whitaker                                     | 
|------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Tony D. Whitaker                                       
|Chairman of the Board and Chief
      Executive Officer
|February 14, 2008                                      

---
**Exhibit 31.1**

Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification

I, Rajesh Kalathur, certify that:

​

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of John Deere Owner Trust 2024 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

​

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

​

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing, and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

​

4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

​

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

​

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association (as indenture trustee).

​

​

| 4                      | ​ | ​                                     |
|------------------------|---------|---------------------------------------------|
| Date: January 24, 2025 | By:     | */s/ Rajesh Kalathur*                       |
| ​                | ​ | Rajesh Kalathur                             |
| ​                | ​ | President of John Deere Capital Corporation |
| ​                | ​ | (as Servicer)                               |

​

----
Order entered April 9, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00817-CR

No. 05-14-00818-CR

No. 05-14-00819-CR

WILLIAM RUSSELL DENVER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F12-62195-M, F12-62196-M, F14-00186-M

ORDER

The Court DENIES appellant’s April 8, 2015 pro se “motion for new trial” and to abate 

the appeals for a hearing on the motion. Appellant is represented by counsel and is not entitled 

to hybrid representation See Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1981).

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.1

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, Paul Fong, the Chief Executive Officer of Furio Resources Inc., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Furio Resources Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date: October 3, 2005



/s/ Paul Fong

Name: Paul Fong

Title: President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Director
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-75,850

EX PARTE KEVIN LEO LAURY Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W94-44471-T(A) IN THE 283RD DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of retaliation and

sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. The Eighth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Laury

v. State, 100 S.W.3d 530 (Tex. App. - El Paso, 2003, no pet.)

Applicant contends that his judgment incorrectly reflects that a $500 fine was assessed. The

trial court found that a fine was imposed when Applicant was initially placed on deferred
LAURY - 2

adjudication community supervision, but the trial court did not verbally indicate that a fine would

be imposed when he assessed punishment after Applicant’s community supervision was

subsequently revoked. The judgment reflects that a $500 fine was assessed. Applicant is entitled

to relief. Taylor v. State, 131 S.W.3d 530 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004).

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. W94-44471-T in the 283rd Judicial District

Court of Dallas County is reformed to delete reference to a fine being imposed.

Delivered: February 27, 2008

Do Not Publish
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 98 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 98

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
repeal the twenty-third article of amendment to the Constitution of the 
                             United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 2020

 Mr. Johnson of South Dakota submitted the following joint resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
repeal the twenty-third article of amendment to the Constitution of the 
                             United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The twenty-third article of amendment to the 
Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.
    ``Section 2. Congress shall have the power to enforce this article 
by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Hall, Appellant.

(No. 31478

Decided October 13, 1948.)

*Mr. Frank T. Cullitan,*prosecuting attorney, and *Miss Gertrude M. Bauer,*for appellee.

*Mr. Louis Fernberg, Mr. Louis P. Fernberg, Jr.,*and *Mr. Myron S. Stanford,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Hart, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.

Zimmerman, J., not participating.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 62 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 62

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed transfer to the 
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates of certain defense 
                         articles and services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2019

  Mr. Ted Lieu of California (for himself, Mr. Amash, and Mr. Engel) 
  submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed transfer to the 
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates of certain defense 
                         articles and services.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the issuance of a 
manufacturing license, technical assistance license, or export license 
with respect to any of the corresponding proposed agreements or 
transfers is prohibited, as described in the following license 
documents designated by the Department of State pursuant to the Arms 
Export Control Act:
            (1) DDTC-17-079.
            (2) DDTC-17-094.
            (3) DDTC-17-112.
            (4) DDTC-17-126.
            (5) DDTC-17-128.
            (6) DDTC-18-013.
            (7) DDTC-18-029.
            (8) DDTC-18-030.
            (9) DDTC-18-050.
            (10) DDTC-18-080.
            (11) DDTC-18-103.
            (12) DDTC-18-109.
            (13) DDTC-18-110.
            (14) DDTC-19-001.
            (15) 17-0B.
            (16) 17-BM.
            (17) 17-CR.
            (18) 17-CU.
            (19) 18-AU.
            (20) 18-BE.
            (21) 19-AA.
            (22) 19-AR.
                                 <all>
```
Incorporation by Reference

Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2015-0499

January 7, 2016

The contents of the following dockets are hereby incorporated by reference into and are 

considered to be included in, contained in, and to have been placed in Docket No. EPA-HQ-OW2015-0499 (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Pesticide General Permit 

for Point Source Discharges from the Application of Pesticides):

EPA-HQ-OW-2003-0063 (Interim Statement and Guidance on Application of Pesticides to 

Waters of the United States in Compliance with FIFRA), legacy EDOCKET ID No. OW2003-0063.

EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0257 (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) 

Pesticide General Permit for Point Source Discharges from the Application of Pesticides)

EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0852 (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) 

Permits for Point Source Discharges from the Application of Pesticides to Waters of the 

United States) 

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0719-0079 (Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, 

Submissions, and Approvals: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permits for 

Point Source Discharges from the Application of Pesticides to Waters of the United States)

Accessing dockets:

All documents in the docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the 

index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be 

publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either 

electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at a docket facility. The Office of Water 

(OW) Docket Center is open from 8:30 until 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The OW Docket Center telephone number is (202) 566–2426, and the Docket address 

is OW Docket, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 

20004. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–

1744.