alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wise Metals Group LLC (the Company) for the quarter ending
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth Stastny, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 16, 2010



By:

/s/ Kenneth StastnyKenneth StastnyChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this
written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

 Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF COTTON

FOR RELEASE AT 12:00 P.M. CT August 9, 2023

U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of cotton. The cotton bales were 

sold on The Seam dated August 8th, 2023.

Offer No. Catalog Location Pounds

Sold

Bales 

Sold

Price Sold 

(per pound) CCC Revenue

TS1153044 AR and LA 1,970 4 $0.3125 $615.63
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the annual Report of Galaxy
Gaming, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert Saucier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|By:    | /s/ Robert Saucier                                                           
|------ | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name:  | Robert Saucier                                                               
|Title: | Principal Executive Officer, Interim Principal Financial Officer and Director
|Date:  | April 16, 2012                                                               



This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 33 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating 

to contributions and expenditures with respect to Federal elections. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 24, 2019 

Mr. YARMUTH (for himself and Mr. COHEN) submitted the following joint 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relating to contributions and expenditures with 

respect to Federal elections. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 33 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Financial expenditures, or in-kind 

3 equivalents, with respect to a candidate for Federal office, 

4 without regard to whether or not a communication ex5 pressly advocates the election or defeat of a specified can6 didate in the election, shall not constitute protected 

7 speech, as guaranteed by this Constitution or any amend8 ment to this Constitution. 

9 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress shall have the power to enact 

10 a mandatory public financing system to provide funds to 

11 qualified candidates in elections for Federal office, which 

12 shall be the sole source of funds raised or spent with re13 spect to Federal elections. 

14 ‘‘SECTION 3. Congress shall have power to enforce 

15 the provisions of this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 35.1





Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.








This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 12, 2022 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-4 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.  I further certify as follows:





1. I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from October 12, 2022 through December 31, 2022, and its performance under the Agreement.





2. To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.








AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.





By:/s/ Connie CoffeyDated:March 3, 2023Connie CoffeyExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,684
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  103,771
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,839
<INVENTORY>                                     82,782
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               213,566
<PP&E>                                         132,067
<DEPRECIATION>                                  81,057
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 296,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          109,273
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,248
<OTHER-SE>                                     119,211
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   296,755
<SALES>                                         70,802
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,802
<CGS>                                           45,770
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,860
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    947
<INCOME-TAX>                                       190
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                757
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       757
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06


</TABLE>
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 35 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative 

to equal rights for men and women. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2019 

Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York (for herself, Mr. REED, Ms. 

SPEIER, Mr. ROUDA, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. SARBANES, Ms. KUSTER of 

New Hampshire, Ms. OMAR, Mrs. HAYES, Mr. SIRES, Ms. SPANBERGER, 

Ms. BONAMICI, Ms. TITUS, Ms. PINGREE, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, 

Mr. HECK, Ms. WEXTON, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. 

VELA ́ZQUEZ, Ms. BROWNLEY of California, Mrs. LURIA, Ms. NORTON, 

Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. MENG, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. 

LOEBSACK, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Mrs. BEATTY, 

Mr. SUOZZI, Ms. DEGETTE, Mr. RASKIN, Ms. HAALAND, Mr. MCNERNEY, Mr. CUMMINGS, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. 

BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania, Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. COHEN, Mr. 

SERRANO, Ms. FRANKEL, Ms. MOORE, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Ms. 

JAYAPAL, Ms. FUDGE, Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. 

MEEKS, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mrs. LAWRENCE, Mr. BEYER, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. LYNCH, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. JACKSON

LEE, Mr. CLAY, Mrs. LOWEY, Ms. SCHRIER, Mr. PETERS, and Mrs. LEE

of Nevada) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relative to equal rights for men and women. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 35 IH 

1 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol2 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con3 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

4 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

5 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

6 States: 

7 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

8 ‘‘SECTION 1. Women shall have equal rights in the 

9 United States and every place subject to its jurisdiction. 

10 Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or 

11 abridged by the United States or by any State on account 

12 of sex. 

13 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress and the several States shall 

14 have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the 

15 provisions of this article. 

16 ‘‘SECTION 3. This amendment shall take effect two 

17 years after the date of ratification.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Denied and Opinion Filed January 23, 2017 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00001-CV 

IN RE TERRENCE MARK GORE, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF12-12707-U 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Schenck 

Opinion by Justice Bridges 

Before the Court is relator’s January 3, 2017 petition for writ of mandamus. Relator has 

appealed the orders complained of in this original proceeding. That appeal remains pending and 

is docketed as case number 05-16-00370-CV. Relator raises the same issues and asserts the 

same arguments in his petition for writ of mandamus as he raises and asserts in his brief in case 

number 05-16-00370-CV. Relator has an adequate remedy on appeal. Accordingly we deny 

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 

(Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). 

170001F.P05 

/David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-4535

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

WINARD MONTEZ EADY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(2:12-cr-00415-DCN-3)

Submitted: March 26, 2015 Decided: April 10, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mario A. Pacella, STROM LAW FIRM, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, 

for Appellant. William N. Nettles, United States Attorney, 

Nathan S. Williams, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Winard Montez Eady appeals his convictions for conspiracy 

to commit robbery affecting interstate commerce, in violation of 

18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1951(a) (2012), and possessing a firearm in 

furtherance of a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§§ 2, 924(c) (2012). Prior to trial, the district court denied 

Eady’s motion to exclude the testimony of the Government’s 

proffered expert witness, Special Agent Mike Sutton. Agent 

Sutton’s testimony concerned historical cell site analysis,

which involves using cellular phone records and tower locations 

to determine a cell phone’s general location at a given point in 

time. On appeal, Eady argues that the district court abused its 

discretion by making a clearly erroneous factual finding when it 

admitted the expert’s testimony. We affirm.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the district court 

incorrectly found that Agent Sutton had conducted a drive test 

to prepare his testimony against Eady. A drive test involves 

driving to cell towers and recording information about the 

strength of their signals. Agent Sutton sometimes uses drive 

testing in his analysis, but he did not in Eady’s case.

Eady argues that the district court erroneously found that 

Agent Sutton had performed a drive test and, therefore, that 

admitting Sutton’s testimony was an abuse of discretion. We 

disagree. Although the district court’s order briefly mentioned
3

drive testing as an example of Agent Sutton’s methods, the court

did not state that a drive test occurred in this case. Because 

the district court never made the factual finding that Eady 

claims is erroneous, we conclude that the district court did not 

abuse its discretion in admitting Agent Sutton’s testimony. See

United States v. Garcia, 752 F.3d 382, 390 (4th Cir. 2014)

(discussing standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Thermal Dynamix, Inc. ) 

) 

Under Contract No. SPM4AW-12-C-0013 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 58991 

Robert A. Klimek, Jr., Esq. 

Klimek & Casale, P.C. 

Washington, DC 

Daniel K. Poling, Esq. 

DLA Chief Trial Attorney 

Edward R. Murray, Esq. 

Michael P. Chiffolo, Esq. 

Trial Attorneys 

DLA Aviation 

Richmond, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 8 April 2015 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 58991, Appeal of Thermal Dynamix, 

Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
# FY16 Vendor Table
»

FILED IN

1STCOUHT OFAPPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

APR -I 2015 , „ 3'2l'\5

El&fi{\OL CHRI^CpBRA^PW*46

CLERK1

o^P^aJ aaoNrA-ty V>uJt Wajj^ \^_& ^*) Ws^r GuvvfQrv^n o^ovjd/ pun

jgffWCi "to At> Ouf>,;X V^vC AqCjjou-^^aVS f&gjow, tk&db "twa-re (<> <\q /Yue4

Vo<r c~c^oXh*sC Cbfi»=v^fa6&q^ (jsn\rU'iy\oL yvw ncyvc«^p>&i ^Twdt'Ofl VciS AjO^: tJufi^iQ-g-ci,

rnaifcus Vo fakjL. JJL /\e^J) Vo VMuaof WfrJ/^ Co-mvp S&^v^iyve

i'gAgt Q^jfc vSO ^-A-Ch o^^v mg, £o <£ i&vfrA3 uiW& ft0*9*^ 0rV Q^ tjOkcCfe

L/A^vJ ^8^„9-
ms ' vWtiUv- COiniTY TQrtw-.

\^l^^j^3MOMI>0^iM^

\\\(\>UPk\ KirHifo APtWavl / JkfluSII £Cr ATfiZfiffig* 1ST COURJ-OF APPEALS

>r^f\uM% .AflflmL : H0U^0NTEXAS

APR'-? 2015

. . [~ v CHRISTOPHER A^PRINE

te^^usioi^^

^lOTi^JDI^to -

XAiiai^a^afSAib^

;JMi£^JD£sJ^y£^gM^^^

Hi
Mf^gMTA^LAiflfcflVff

Of £Ii^_ APft&\ ^r^Lin^. v^Ksb^^lk, /ypPPJU/flo- Aj^DrZKTfe/ uj^^-^A -

_^^l\>LJk£LJ^\^ .

1X^\Va-VjgS *l. .Ue£L-- t fo3JJ& .551 j. 10 E> Sob ®?Q ua^) !te

d& ^eavjKi^esfe, ^ :

(£_

MLUDum

JLBStki^iiiem^

t 6aM -Atsjoi nnu&ets/ StoAe, iw&r MjvM -&l-.Afraid fa£_ <
'|,'ll,l(l''lM'tlu,'lllll',,lll,ll"l,"l,lll,,,,,llul,,l,M'
KOKU-KU-KI-337 No. TCD-8595-2015

Date of Issue: July 1, 2015

Japan Civil Aviation Bureau

TAIKUSEI-KAIZEN-TSUHO

Airworthiness Directive

The undermentioned examinations or modifications are mandatory.

1. Applies to: Mitsubishi MU-2B-30/-35/-36 airplanes, serial numbers from 502 

through 696 (except 652 and 661)

2. Compliance is required as indicated, unless already accomplished.

To detect and correct cracks in the main landing gear oleo attach fittings,

which could adversely affect the safe landing of the aeroplane, accomplish 

the following.

2.1 Within 100 flight hours or 6 months, whichever occurs first after the 

effective date of this AD, visually inspect the main landing gear oleo attach 

fittings and lubricate the pin assemblies in accordance with the

instructions of Mitsubishi MU-2 Service Bulletin No. 243 or later 

JCAB-approved revision (hereinafter referred to as SB).

2.2 After the accomplishment of the actions as required by paragraph 2.1 of 

this AD, repeat the inspection and the lubrication at intervals not to 

exceed 100 flight hours or 1 year, whichever occurs first, in accordance 

with the approved MU-2 Maintenance Requirement Manual.

2.3 If, during any inspection as required by paragraph 2.1 or 2.2 of this AD,

any crack is detected, before next flight, replace the main landing gear oleo 

attach fittings in accordance with the instructions of SB.

2.4 An alternative means of compliance with this AD may be used, if approved 

by the Director-General of JCAB.

3. Remarks

3.1 This AD becomes effective on July 15, 2015.

3.2 Mitsubishi MU-2 Service Bulletin No.243 dated June 30, 2015 and later 

JCAB approved revisions pertain to this subject.

This is the English translation. In case of any difficulty, refer to the Japanese original text.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 4.6    
  


 
 

AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE
  TO THE NON-STANDARDIZED
  JOINDER AGREEMENT FOR THE
  CROSSMANN COMMUNITIES, INC.
  401(k) PROFIT SHARING PLAN    
  


        THIS AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE is executed on behalf of Crossmann Communities, Inc. ("Company"), and Richard H. Crosser, John Scheumann, and Jennifer Holihen, as
trustees ("Trustees"). 


        WITNESSETH:



        WHEREAS,
the Company adopted the Crossmann Communities, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan ("Plan"), effective as of February 28, 1991, and such Plan has been subsequently
amended from to time to time; 


        WHEREAS,
the Company now desires to amend the Joinder Agreement for the Plan to add Trinity Homes, LLC as an adopting employer under the Plan; and 


        WHEREAS,
the Company reserved the right to amend its elections in the Joinder Agreement for Plan pursuant to Sections 7.12 and 8.01(b) of the Plan. 


        NOW,
THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2001, as follows: 



        1.    The
list of Adopting Employers under Item 1 of the Joinder Agreement for the Plan is hereby amended by the addition of the following: 



	"EMPLOYER	 	EIN	 	ADOPTING EMPLOYER
	
9. Trinity Homes, LLC	
 	

35-2023721	
 	

Yes (granted prior service credit for eligibility and vesting)"






        2.    Item
16 of the Joinder Agreement for the Plan, regarding eligibility service, is hereby amended by the addition of the following sentence at the end thereof: 




"Service
with Trinity Homes, LLC prior to the date Trinity Homes, LLC became an adopting employer under the Plan shall be included in years of Eligibility Service." 





        3.    Item
17 of the Joinder Agreement for the Plan, regarding vesting service, is hereby amended by the addition of the following at the end thereof: 




"Service
with Trinity Homes, LLC prior to the date Trinity Homes, LLC became an adopting employer under the Plan shall be included in years of Vesting Service." 





        4.    In
all other respects, the Joinder Agreement for the Plan shall be and remain unchanged. 






 

        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Crossmann Communities, Inc. and the Trustees for the Plan have caused this Amendment Number Three to the Joinder Agreement for the Plan to be executed this
            day of December, 2000. 



	TRUSTEES	 	CROSSMANN COMMUNITIES, INC.
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

 
	/s/ Richard H. Crosser
	 	 	 	/s/ John Scheumann

	Richard H. Crosser	 	 	 	John Scheumann, Chairman and CEO
	

/s/ John Scheumann
 John Scheumann	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

/s/ Jennifer Holihen
 Jennifer Holihen	
 	

 	
 	

 




2









QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 4.6


AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE TO THE NON-STANDARDIZED JOINDER AGREEMENT FOR THE CROSSMANN COMMUNITIES, INC. 401(k) PROFIT SHARING PLAN
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 25, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 25, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0298. FAMILY DERMATOLOGY PC v. DIONNE D. LOUIS A/K/A DIONNE D.

LOUIS PC.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22E0017. KACZOROWSKI v. KACZOROWSKI.

The RULE 40(B) EMERGENCY MOTION for AN EXTENSION OF TIME

in which to file an Application for Discretionary Appeal in the above-styled case is

hereby GRANTED until 12/13/21.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

November 22, 2021

11/22/2021