T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M A R I O M A G L A Q U E S I S O N , J r .; VI VI AN MONI QU E S I S ON , P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N os . 08- 70351 08- 72336 A ge nc yN os . A 095- 198- 335

A 095- 198- 336 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i ons f

orR e vi e w of

O r de r s of

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay25, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. I n the s e c ons ol i da t e d pe t i t i ons f orr e vi e w , M ar i o M a gl a que S i s on, J r . , and V i vi an M on i qu e S i son, nat i ves and ci t i ze ns of the P hi l i pp i nes, pet i t i on for r evi ew o f th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e r s d e n y in g th e irm o tio n to r e o p e n an dth e i rmo t i o n t o r e c o n s i d e r . O u rj u r i s d i c t i o n i s g o v e rn e db y8 U . S. C. 

# FI LED JU N 02 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 70351 2 § 1252. W e r e vi e w f

orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of am ot i on t o r e ope n or r e c o n s id e r . Sa l ta v . I

NS , 314 F . 3d 1076, 1078 ( 9th C i r . 2002) . I n N o. 08- 70351, we d e n yi n p artan dd i s m i s s i n p artth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. I n No . 0 8 - 7 2 3 3 6 , we d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n to re op en because the m ot i on w as fi l ed m ore than 1 9 m on ths af t erthe B IA ’ s O ct ob er 28 , 20 05 , order di sm i ss i ng the un derl yi ng appeal , and fai l ed t o q ual i fyfor an e x c e p tio n to th e 9 0 - d ayf ilin g lim ita tio n . See 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (2)- (3). C o n trary to p etit io n er s’ co n ten ti o n , w e lac kju risd icti o n to re v iew th e B IA ’s d e c is io n n o t to in v o k e its s u as p o n te au th o r ityto r e o p e n p r o c e e d in g s . Se e Eki m i an v . I NS , 30 3 F . 3d 11 53 , 11 59 (9th C i r. 20 02 ). T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n to r e c ons i de rbe c aus e pe t i t i one r s f a i l e d t o i de nt i f

yanye rr orof

f a c torl aw i n the B IA ’ s D ec em ber 26, 20 07 , deci si on concl ud i ng thatthe m ot i on t o reopen w as u n tim e lyan df

a ile dto qu a lif

yf o ran e x c e p tio n to th e f

ilin g d e a d lin e . See 8 C. F. R. § 1 00 3. 2(b)(1). I n l i ghtof

ourdi s pos i t i on, w e do notc ons i de rpe t i t i one r s ’ r e m a i ni ng co n t en t i o n s. In N o. 08 -703 51 : P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art;08- 70351 3 D IS M IS S E D i n p art. I n No . 0 8 - 7 2 3 3 6 : P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.