alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SHARON KELLER

 PRESIDING JUDGE

LAWRENCE E. MEYERS

CHERYL JOHNSON

MIKE KEASLER

BARBARA P. HERVEY

ELSA ALCALA

BERT RICHARDSON

KEVIN P. YEARY

DAVID NEWELL

 JUDGES

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK

(512) 463-1551

SIAN SCHILHAB

GENERAL COUNSEL

(512) 463-1597

SUPREME COURT BUILDING, 201 WEST 14TH STREET, ROOM 106, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701

WEBSITE WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/CCA.ASPX

Thursday, April 09, 2015

Lawrence B. Mitchell

P.O. Box 797632

Dallas, TX 75379

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: DONALDSON, PATRICIA

CCA No. PD-0572-14, PD-0573-14 COA No. 05-13-00598-CR

Trial Court Case No. F-1000433-S, F10-0435-S COA No. 05-13-00599-CR

The Court has received notice you have been appointed as counsel in the above referenced

causes. The appellant’s brief is due May 11, 2015. Briefs must be efiled.

Sincerely,

_____________________________

Abel Acosta, Clerk

cc: PATRICIA DONALDSON

District Attorney Dallas County (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

FILE COPY
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 72 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 72

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 14, 2019

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Directing the Clerk of the House to make a correction in the enrollment 
                             of H.R. 2423.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 2423, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall make the following corrections:
            (1) In section 2(a)(3), strike ``Carrie Chapman Cat'' and 
        insert ``Carrie Chapman Catt''.
            (2) In section 4(a)(2)(C), strike the period after ``Unum'' 
        and insert a period after the closed quotation mark at the end.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 13, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 57

Condemning the heinous atrocities that occurred on March 5, 2001, at

Santana High School in Santee, California.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 8, 2001

Mr. HUNTER (for himself, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. ISSA, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mrs. BONO, Mr. LEWIS of California, Mr. HERGER, Mr. DREIER,

Mr. CALVERT, Mr. GARY MILLER of California, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr.

RADANOVICH, Mr. HORN, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. POMBO, Mrs.

TAUSCHER, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. FILNER, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr.

MCKEON, Mr. OSE, Mr. BERMAN, and Mr. LANTOS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and

the Workforce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Condemning the heinous atrocities that occurred on March

5, 2001, at Santana High School in Santee, California.

Whereas on March 5, 2001, a gunman opened fire at

Santana High School in Santee, California, killing 2 students and wounding 13 others: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) condemns, in the strongest possible terms,

4 the heinous atrocities that occurred on March 5,

5 2001, at Santana High School in Santee, California;
2

•HCON 57 IH

1 (2) offers its deepest condolences to the fami2 lies, friends, and loved ones of those killed in the

3 shooting;

4 (3) expresses hope for the rapid and complete

5 recovery of those wounded in the shooting;

6 (4) applauds the hard work and dedication ex7 hibited by local and State law enforcement officials

8 and by others who offered support and assistance;

9 (5) commends the rapid response by the faculty

10 and staff of Santana High School in evacuating its

11 students to safety in an efficient and effective man12 ner; and

13 (6) encourages the people of the United States

14 to engage in a national dialogue on preventing

15 school violence.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, April 19, 2012 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B), and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii), and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Gallagher, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session, and determined that no earlier notice thereof was possible.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, April 19, 2012 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings;

A litigation matter; and

An opinion.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted, or postponed, please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: April 13, 2012.

Kevin M. O'Neill, 

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-9304 Filed 4-13-12; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARQUIS ANTHONY NELSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. Irene C. Berger, District 

Judge. (1:08-cr-00058-1; 1:15-cv-13059)

Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 18, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marquis Anthony Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. John Lanier File, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Beckley, West Virginia; Steven 

Loew, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Marquis Anthony Nelson appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. However, we affirm as

modified to reflect that Nelson’s motion is dismissed without 

prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. See United States v. Modanlo, 

762 F.3d 403, 408 (4th Cir. 2014) (holding that “district court 

does not regain jurisdiction until the issuance of the mandate by 

the clerk of the court of appeals” (internal quotation marks 

omitted)). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
PD-0207-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 4/9/2015 2:06:40 PM

Accepted 4/10/2015 10:43:17 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

DFTEXA:

PYRUVATE

FEWALTYF©R

USE

0 -— v

0004279596

0 2 1M

MAR 31 

MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 

RE: WR-12,375-24

HERBERT HERMAN FEIST

:^a K^UNTY C0^ECT,ONAL FACILITY* 18805

BEAUMONT, TX 77720 UT?

55 <?lfigil-fe|^.0.fl 772.O .-ii|...-»f9 «'i>^|ir.|'-i,i-hi, ii|{Viiii,-;-!.-!'!!}-^.. p,f.ii'iVl.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER  AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying
Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Med-Zone Biotechnologies Acquisition, Inc.for the
quarter ending August 31, 2005, I, Dennis Chen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Med-Zone Biotechnologies Acquisition, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1.
               
               Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending August 31, 2005,
               fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
               Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.
               
               The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
               quarter ending August 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
               financial condition and results of operations of Med-Zone Biotechnologies
               Acquisition, Inc.   Dated: October 19, 2005  By: /s/ Dennis Chen  Chief Executive Officer
andChief Financial Officer
Order entered April 10, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00170-CV

ERIC DRAKE, Appellant

V.

CARMEN SIFUENTES, CONSUMERS COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE, Appellees

No. 05-13-00871-CV

ERIC DRAKE, Appellant

V.

TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, ET AL., Appellees

No. 05-13-00894-CV

ERIC DRAKE, Appellant

V.

KRISTINA KASTL, Appellee

No. 05-13-01520-CV

ERIC DRAKE, Appellant

V.

TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, ET AL., Appellees
No. 05-14-00355-CV

ERIC DRAKE, Appellant

V.

STEPHEN WALKER, ET AL., Appellees

ORDER

Before the Court En Banc

The Court DENIES appellant’s April 9, 2015 “Motion to Recuse and Disqualify” Chief 

Justice Wright.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES

JUSTICE
IES Order NumherdCBI 

Registry Number: ___ ___, 

CA Index Name: 

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN. 

CAS 

D If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your I ES order. Please make the same corrections to your PMN before submitting it to the EPA. 

2540 Olentangy River Road P.O. Box 3343 Columbus, OH 43210-0334 USA
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's consolidated financial statements for the twelve months ended
September 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          95,705
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  641,608
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (22,072)
<INVENTORY>                                     21,035
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               937,667
<PP&E>                                       5,036,134
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,223,913)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,999,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          995,506
<BONDS>                                      1,792,863
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,725
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,378,733
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,999,481
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,745,748
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,437,661
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               641,216
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                20,604
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             118,277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                588,068
<INCOME-TAX>                                   232,089
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            349,373
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    999
<CHANGES>                                        9,563
<NET-INCOME>                                   338,811
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.87
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Martin, Appellant.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, *427New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered on October 26, 1988, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and sentencing defendant to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 6 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0024 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SLADE ALLEN CLAWSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 29, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 21 2023

02/21/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0024
KAREN DAVIS HUBER FAA OFFICE OF REGIONAL COUNSEL 1601 LIND AVE., SW 

# RECEIVED

RENTON, WASIIINGTON 98057 TELEPHONE: (425) 227-2167 FACSIMILE: (425) 227-1007 

## ·.MAR 212012 

# HEARING DOCKET

In the Matter of: 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Aviation Technical Services, Inc. FAA Case No. 2010NM010105 FDM:; ;.;;::;. FAA-20 1!-0682
Judge Richard C. Goodwin

Administrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin 

### MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
Pursuantto 14 CFR Sections 13.218 and 13.221(b) Complaintthrough its undersigned counsel respectfully re.quests thatthe hearing in this matter be rescheduled from August 28-30,2012 to the weeks ofOctober 15-19, 2012; October 22-26, 2012; October 29-November 2, 2012, or another latertime which is convenient for the Judge, the parties, and their counsel.
In support ofthis motion, Complainant's counsel submits: 1) She has previously scheduled, prepaid, and nonrefundable personal leave scheduled from August 21 through September4; 2) One ofthe Complainant's witnesses also has personal leave scheduled during the hearing dates established in the March 13, 2012 notice; 3) Complainant's counsel has conferred with counsel for Respondent Aviation Technical Services, Inc., who has no objectionto the proposed continuance; and 4) The parties andtheir counsel have no known conflicts during the three alternate weeks suggested above.
Respectfully submitted this 14th day ofMarch 2012. 

# j{__(h;;L**()_~** Katen'Davis Huber 

### FAAAttorney

'' '•1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that the foregoing Motion for Continuance has been served via facsimile transmission and regular mail to the following:

Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 Fax: (202) 493-5142
Honorable Richard Goodwin Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 FAX: (202) 366-7536
Dane B. Jaques, Esq. DombroffGilmore Jaques & 

### French, PC 1676 International Drive, Penthouse McLean, VA 22101 TEL: (703) 336-8800 FAX: (703) 966-6111

Dated this 14'h day ofMarch 2012.

Karen D. Huber (Original and 1 copy)

Office ofRegional Counsel (ANM-7) Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Ave. SW

Motion for Continuance- 20IONMOI0I05 FDMS No. FAA-2011-0682 FAA v. Aviation Technical Services, Inc. Page 2 of2 

### Renton, W A 98057

KAREN DAVIS HUBER, FAA ATTORNEY TEL: (425) 227-2167; FAX: (425) 227-1007
| (1)   | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          | Lazy Days' R.V. Center,      Inc. |                                                   |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                          |                              |                                                   |   |
| Date:       May 15, 2008 | By:                               | /s/            Randy Lay |   |
|                          |                              | Name       Randy Lay                              |   |
|                          |                              | Title         Chief Financial Officer   |   |
|                          |                              |                                                   |   |
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15I0151. JASON GRAHAM et al. v. WELLSTAR HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.

et al.

Jason Graham, Joy Scoggins, and Aubrey Tap seek immediate review of the

trial court’s order granting partial summary judgment to Defendants David Howell,

Wellstar Health System, and Clarence Hendrix on their simple negligence claims in

this wrongful death action. Under OCGA § 9-11-56 (h), the grant of summary

judgment on any issue or as to any party is reviewable by direct appeal. City of

Demorest v. Town of Mt. Airy, 282 Ga. 653, 654 n.1 (653 SE2d 43) (2007); Whiddon

v. Stargell, 192 Ga. App. 826, 827-28 (386 SE2d 884) (1989). 

We will grant a timely application for interlocutory appeal if the order

complained of is subject to direct appeal and the applicants have not otherwise filed

a timely notice of appeal. Spivey v. Hembree, 268 Ga. App. 485, 486 n.1 (602 SE2d

246) (2004). Accordingly, this interlocutory application is hereby GRANTED. The

plaintiffs shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal in

the trial court. If they have already filed a notice of appeal from the order at issue

here, they need not file a second notice. The clerk of the trial court is directed to

include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/27/2015

March 27, 2015
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tony D.
Whitaker, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.





/s/Tony D. WhitakerTony
      D. WhitakerChairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerMay
      11, 2009