alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1517 WEST FRONT STREET SUITE 354 TYLER, TX 75702 TEL: 903-593-8471 FAX: 903-593-2193

Serving Anderson, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith, Trinity, Upshur, Van 

Zandt and Wood Counties

www.12thcoa.courts.state.tx.us

CHIEF JUSTICE

JAMES T. WORTHEN

JUSTICES

BRIAN HOYLE

GREG NEELEY

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

CLERK

CATHY S. LUSK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

MARGARET HUSSEY

April 7, 2015

Ms. Lois Rogers

District Clerk, Smith County

Courthouse, Suite 204

100 North Broadway Avenue

Tyler, TX 75702-7201

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 12-14-00096-CR, 12-14-00097-CR, 

12-14-00098-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 114-0549-09, 114-0550-09, 114-0551-09

Style: Demaria Travar Woods

v.

The State of Texas

Pursuant to Rule 18.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, enclosed herewith is the 

Mandate issued in the above causes. When the District or County Clerk has executed the 

Mandate in accordance with the opinion of this Court, the Clerk is requested to fill in the 

information below and to return the attached copy to this office.

Very truly yours,

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:_____________________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

CC: Mr. Austin R. Jackson (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Michael J. West (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mandate executed on __8TH__ day of __APRIL_______________, 2015.

Brief explanation of action taken: ___SCANNED_______________________________________

____________LINDA RHYMES________________________________District/County Clerk

FILE COPY

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 4/8/2015 2:09:06 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
CAUSE NO. 12-14-00109-CR

BRANDON MEDFORD IN THE 

VS. TWELFTH COURT 

THE STATE OF TEXAS OF APPEALS 

MOTION TO 

EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLANTS PRO SE BRIEF 

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE SAID COURT: 

 Now comes Appellant in the above styled and numbered cause, and moves this court to grant an 

extension of time to file appellants pro se brief, pursuant to Rule 38.6 of the Texas Rules of Appellants 

Procedure, and for good cause shows the following: 

1. The case is on appeal from the 114th Judicial District Court of Smith County, Texas. 

2. The case below was styled State v. Brandon Medford and numbers 114-1087-12. 

3. Appellant was convicted of Indecency with a Child. 

4. Appellant was assessed a sentence of eight years confinement in the Texas Department of 

Criminal Justice – Institutional Division. 

5. Notice of appeal was given on April 22, 2014. 

6. The clerk’s record was filed on April 30, 2014; the Reporters Record was filed on August 15, 

2014. 

7. The Appellants Brief was filed December 15, 2014; The States Reply Brief was not filed and they 

waived filing one on December 17, 2014. 

8. The Appellants Pro Se Brief is due on April 13, 2015. Appellant request the Court an extension of 

thirty (30) days, 

9. Appellant requests an extension of time due to the following facts and circumstances. Appellant 

is pro se in this matter. The appellant has been reviewing the clerk’s record and reports record. 

Due to the length of the records made available, I need more time to prepare my pro se brief. 

The appellant is not currently incarcerated and is on bond. During the past three (3) months the 

appellant has been ill and in and out of the doctor and hospital. Pro se appellant is requesting 

the court grant an additional thirty (30) days to prepare the brief. 

10. Appellant requests an extension of time due to the above facts and circumstances. 

11. Appellant prays that this Court grant the Motion to Extend Time to File Appellants Brief for a 

period of thirty (30) days, and for such other and further relief as the Court may deem 

appropriate. 

 Respectfully Submitted, 

 Brandon Medford, Pro Se 

ACCEPTED

121400109

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

4/13/2015 7:44:29 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 4/13/2015 7:44:29 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
 302 Paul Street

 Troup, Texas 75789

 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 This is to certify that on April 13, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was served to Michael West, Smith County District Attorney’s Office, 100 N 

Broadway, Tyler, Texas 75702, by regular mail, fax, hand delivery, or electronic filing,

Brandon Medford
FO 5 Producer Milk

1 Dot = 100,000 Pounds

Appalachian Marketing Area Milkshed

Federal Order No. 5

May 2014

The map represents 79.0% of the total producer milk

for the month due to confidentiality issues.

Prepared by the Appalachian Milk Market Administrator Office
FO 5 Producer Milk

1 Dot = 100,000 Pounds

Appalachian Marketing Area Milkshed

Federal Order No. 5

December 2014

The map represents 80.0% of the total producer milk

for the month due to confidentiality issues.

Prepared by the Appalachian Milk Market Administrator Office
FO 5 Producer Milk

1 Dot = 100,000 Pounds

Appalachian Marketing Area Milkshed

Federal Order No. 5

May 2015

The map represents 81.9% of the total producer milk

for the month due to confidentiality issues.

Prepared by the Appalachian Milk Market Administrator Office
FO 5 Producer Milk

1 Dot = 100,000 Pounds

Appalachian Marketing Area Milkshed

Federal Order No. 5

December 2015

The map represents 85.0% of the total producer milk

for the month due to confidentiality issues.

Prepared by the Appalachian Milk Market Administrator Office
FO 5 Producer Milk

1 Dot = 100,000 Pounds

Appalachian Marketing Area Milkshed

Federal Order No. 5

May 2016

The map represents 82.2% of the total producer milk

for the month due to confidentiality issues.

Prepared by the Appalachian Milk Market Administrator Office
FO 5 Producer Milk

1 Dot = 100,000 Pounds

Appalachian Marketing Area Milkshed

Federal Order No. 5

December 2016

The map represents 79.4% of the total producer milk

for the month due to confidentiality issues.

Prepared by the Appalachian Milk Market Administrator Office
FO 5 Producer Milk

1 Dot = 100,000 Pounds

Appalachian Marketing Area Milkshed

Federal Order No. 5

May 2017

The map represents 86.1% of the total producer milk

for the month due to confidentiality issues.

Prepared by the Appalachian Milk Market Administrator Office
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1088 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1088

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To authorize the Society of the First Infantry Division to make 
modifications to the First Division Monument located on Federal Land in 
 President's Park in the District of Columbia, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``First Infantry Recognition of 
Sacrifice in Theater Act'' or the ``FIRST Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION TO FIRST DIVISION MONUMENT.

    (a) Authorization.--The Society of the First Infantry Division (an 
organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 and exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of that 
code), may make modifications (including construction of additional 
plaques and stone plinths on which to put the plaques) to the First 
Division Monument located on Federal land in President's Park in the 
District of Columbia that was set aside for memorial purposes of the 
First Infantry Division, in order to honor the members of the First 
Infantry Division who paid the ultimate sacrifice during United States 
operations, including Operation Desert Storm, Operation Iraqi Freedom 
and New Dawn, and Operation Enduring Freedom. The First Infantry 
Division at the Department of the Army shall collaborate with the 
Department of Defense to provide to the Society of the First Infantry 
Division the list of names to be added.
    (b) Non-Application of Commemorative Works Act.--Subsection (b) of 
section 8903 of title 40, United States Code (commonly known as the 
``Commemorative Works Act''), shall not apply to actions taken under 
subsection (a) of this section.
    (c) Funding.--Federal funds may not be used to pay any expense of 
the activities of the Society of the First Infantry Division which are 
authorized by this section.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 20, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1088

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To authorize the Society of the First Infantry Division to make 
modifications to the First Division Monument located on Federal Land in 
 President's Park in the District of Columbia, and for other purposes.
```
No. 01-14-00857-CR

In the 

Court of Appeals 

For the 

First District of Texas 

At Houston 



No. 1410607 

In the 185th District Court of 

Harris County, Texas 



JESSE DIMAS ALVARADO

Appellant 

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS 

Appellee 



STATE’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

IN WHICH TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF 



TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS:

 COMES NOW THE STATE OF TEXAS, in accordance with Rules 10.5(b)(1) 

and 38.6(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and files this motion for 

extension of time in which to file the State’s brief in these cases, and, in support 

thereof, presents the following: 

1. In the 185th district court of Harris County, Texas, cause 1410607, the State of 

Texas v. Jesse Dimas Alvarado, appellant, was convicted of felon in possession 

of a weapon. 

ACCEPTED

01-14-00857-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/13/2015 9:13:35 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/13/2015 9:13:35 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
2. He was assessed punishment of confinement for 5 years in the Institutional 

Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. 

3. The State’s brief was due on April 10, 2015.

4. An extension of time in which to file the State’s brief is requested until May 

13, 2015.

5. No previous extensions have been requested by the State.

6. The facts relied upon to explain the need for this extension are:

Since appellant filed his brief, I have filed briefs in cause numbers 14-14-

00204-CR and 14-14-00777-CR. In addition to the present case, I have 4 briefs 

assigned to me, am recreating exhibits for an abatement hearing in cause 

number 14-13-00767-CR, and am preparing for trial on May 4th, 2015 on the 

State of Texas v. Sidney Darrell in cause number 1421932. I was also out of the 

country from April 8th to April 12th on vacation. This motion is not sought for 

delay, but so that justice may be done.

WHEREFORE, the State prays that this Court will grant an extension of time 

until May 13, 2015 in which to file the State’s brief in this case.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Abbie Miles

Abbie Miles

Assistant District Attorney

Harris County, Texas

1201 Franklin, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 755-5826

TBC No. 24072240
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing instrument has been mailed to the 

appellant’s attorney at the following address on April 13, 2015:

Timothy A. Hootman

2402 Pease Street

Houston, TX 77003

Thootman2000@yahoo.com

/s/ Abbie Miles

Abbie Miles

Assistant District Attorney

Harris County, Texas

Date: April 13, 2015
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 78 (Monday, April 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24227-24228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9694]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Social and Economic Sciences; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:
    Name: Site visit review of the Nanoscale Science and Engineering 
Center (NSEC) at Arizona State University by the Division Social and 
Economic Sciences (<greek-i>10748).
    Dates & Times:

May 2, 2012; 7 p.m.-9 p.m.
May 3, 2012: 7:45 a.m.-9:15 p.m.
May 4, 2012: 8 a.m.-3:30 p.m.

    Place: Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
    Type of Meeting: Part open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Frederick Kronz, Program Director; Science, 
Technology and Society Program; Division of Social and Economic 
Sciences, Room 990, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-7283.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning further support of the NSEC at the Arizona State University.
    Agenda:

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

7 p.m.-9 p.m. Closed--Executive Session

Thursday, May 3, 2012

    7:45 a.m.-4:30 p.m. Open--Review of the NSEC
    4:15 p.m.-5:45 p.m. Closed--Executive Session
    5:45 p.m.-9:15 p.m. Open--Poster Session; Dinner

[[Page 24228]]

Friday, May 4, 2012

    8 a.m.-9 a.m. Closed--Executive session
    9 a.m.-10:30 a.m. Open--Review of the NSEC
    10:30 a.m.-3:30 p.m. Closed--Executive Session, Draft and Review 
Report
    Reason for Late Notice: Scheduling complications and the necessity 
to proceed with the review.
    Reason for Closing: The work being reviewed may include information 
of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical 
information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the MRSEC. These matters are 
exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552 b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the 
Sunshine Act.

    Dated: April 18, 2012.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-9694 Filed 4-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ZAGG Incorporated (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert G. Pedersen II,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss..1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/
ROBERT G. PEDERSEN II
 Robert G.
Pedersen II
 Chief
Executive Officer
 May 14,
2009
' l' 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS 

OFFICE OF THE CLERK 

APRIL 1 I 2015 

HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS, ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK. 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS 

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION 

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 

RE: KEITH L. CARTER V. DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK 

TRL.- CT. NO. F-0242680-RV 

Dear Ms. Pearson: 

Enclosed for filing is Relator's "WRIT OF MANDAMUS" accordinqly. 

Please qive notice upon receipt. 

Thank you respectfully for your assistance. 

Sincerely, 

Keith L. Carter 

Relator - Applicant 

KLC/trh 

cc: file; 

RECEIVED IN 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

APR 13 2015 
c ' 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN, TEXAS 

NO. WR-64,532-03 

KEITH L. CARTER, RELATOR 

v. 

DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, RESPONDENT 

ON APPLICATION .FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

CAUSE NO. F-0242680-RV 

IN THE 292nd JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT 

FROM DALLAS COUNTY 

ORDER 

Relator filed a previous mandamus pursuant. to the jurisdiction of this Court. 

In it he contends that he filed an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus 

in the 292nd judicial district Court of Dallas County, Texas. 

In an attempt to proceed under jurisdictional procedure where such Writ of 

Habeas Corpus is ordered by the convicting Trial Court to the Clerk of the 

District Court to send such Application of Writ of Habeas CorP.us to this 

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. 

Under leqal analysis perspective additional facts have been provided throuqh 

due dilisence that all records, except the ori~inal Writ of Habeas Corpus, 

nor a copy of the Writ of Habeas Corpus has been sent in compliance and order 

by the Trial Court or mandamus order by the Court of Criminal Appeals of. 

Texas under the supra number WR-64,532-03 whereeridence shows no Application 

for Writ of Habeas Corpus was with the records sent by the Clerk of Dallas 

county, Texas. 

Further the continuation of such delay of Habeas proceedinq process is violaitve under State and Federal Constitutional Law when the State's hi$hest 

Court can not proceed accordinsly due to District Clerk failure to obey such 

order at his or her discretion after (McCree v. Hampton) have expired and 

no Application of Writ of Habeas Corpus have not been provided accordinqly. 

KLC/trh 

cc: file;
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# DATES AND TIMES:

Thursday, May 3, 2012, at 10 a.m.; and Friday, May 4, at 8:30 a.m. and 10:30 a.m.

# PLACE:

Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW., in the Benjamin Franklin Room.

# STATUS:

Thursday, May 3 at 10 a.m.—Closed; Friday, May 4 at 8:30 a.m.—Open; and at 10:30 a.m.—Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

## Thursday, May 3 at 10 a.m. (Closed)

1. Strategic Issues.

2. Financial Matters.

3. Pricing.

4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.

5. Governors' Executive Session—Discussion of prior agenda items and Board Governance.

## Friday, May 4 at 8:30 a.m. (Open)

1. Approval of Minutes of Previous Meetings.

2. Remarks of the Chairman of the Board.

3. Remarks of the Postmaster General and CEO.

4. Committee Reports.

5. Quarterly Report on Financial Performance.

6. Quarterly Report on Service Performance.

                    7. Tentative Agenda for the June 14, 2012, meeting in Washington, DC.                          ( print page 22824)    

## Friday, May 4 at 10:30 a.m. (Closed—if needed)

1. Continuation of Thursday's closed session agenda.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-9394 Filed 4-13-12; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-12 P
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

Assigned on Briefs February 11, 2015

JOHN C. CRIM v. STATE OF TENNESSEE

Appeal from the Criminal Court for Wilson County

No. 08CR567 David Earl Durham, Judge

No. M2014-00948-CCA-R3-PC - Filed April 13, 2015

THOMAS T. WOODALL, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority’s opinion which affirms part

of the post-conviction court’ssummary dismissal of the post-conviction petition. A colorable

claim was made in the pro se petition. The post-conviction court clearly erred by summarily

dismissing the petition. I conclude that upon remand under these circumstances the interests

of justice dictate that the entire pro se petition must be considered by the post-conviction

court. It may be that some of Petitioner’s claims have been waived or previously determined

- but that should be determined after a full hearing. This court should not sanction a rush to

judgment when a trial court has erred as in this case. Accordingly, I would respectfully

reverse the order of the post-conviction court without affirming any portion of it.

_______________________________________

THOMAS T. WOODALL, PRESIDING JUDGE
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Left Behind Games, Inc., a Washington corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Troy A. Lyndon, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: July 14, 2010/s/ TROY A. LYNDONTroy A. Lyndon
President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of Directors
(Principal Executive Officer)
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)