alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eileen Neundorff, Also Known as Eileen Nuendorff, Appellant.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Putnam County (Braatz, J.), rendered July 26, 1989, convicting her of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues *581which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
International Virtual Industry Day 2022 Pg. 1

Package Labeling and Research Testing

Moderator: Dan Webber, Branch Chief, Packaged Commodity Procurement, Dan.Webber@usda.gov

Panelists:

Ruffo Perez, PhD, Sr Food Technology Advisor, USAID, BHA, ruperez@usaid.gov

Kelsey Ryan, PhD, Food Technologist, USAID, BHA, keryan@usaid.gov

Kevin Tutasig, USAID, HA Officer, Supply Chain Mgmt Div, ktutasig@usaid.gov

Andy Greenfield, Team Lead, USDA, Specification Mgmt Team, Andrew.S.Greenfield@usda.gov
International Virtual Industry Day 2022 Pg. 2

Packaging, Quality Standards, 

Fumigation, and Container Inspections

Moderator: Dan Webber, Branch Chief, Packaged Commodity Procurement, Dan.Webber@usda.gov

Panelists:

Nick Kharabadze, Director Operations, Foreign Agriculture Service, International Food 

Assistance Division, Nicholas.Kharabadze@usda.gov

Paul Vicinanzo, USAID, Division Chief, Transportation Division, OAA, pvicinanzo@usaid.gov

Samira Traore, Program Assistant, USAID, BHA, Supply Chain Mgmt Division, 

samtraore@usaid.gov

Jamie Fisher, Director, USAID, Supply Chain Mgmt Division, jfisher@usaid.gov
International Virtual Industry Day 2022 Pg. 3

Open Forum - Stakeholder Issues - Q & A

Moderator: Dan Webber, Branch Chief, Packaged Commodity Procurement, 

Dan.Webber@usda.gov

• Supply Chain Concerns

• USDA Reminders

• Stakeholder Issues

• Closing Remarks: Chris Purdy, Associate Deputy Director, Commodity Procurement 

Program, Christopher.Purdy@usda.gov
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment
      Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certifies
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Michael M. Schurer


Michael
      M. Schurer


Chief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer


(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)


May
      15,
      2006
Exhibit 32.2**POLYPORE, INC.****CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Polypore, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended April 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, Lynn Amos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does herebycertify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.    May 16, 2005           /s/ Lynn Amos     Lynn Amos  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.2


 


SERVICE PROPERTIES TRUST


 


Summary of Trustee Compensation


 


The following is a summary of the currently effective
compensation of the Trustees of Service Properties Trust (the “Company”) for services as Trustees, which is subject to modification
at any time by the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) or the Compensation Committee of the Board, as applicable:


 


	 	·	Each Independent Trustee receives an annual fee of $75,000 for services as a Trustee. The annual fee for any new Independent Trustee is prorated for the initial year.


 


	 	·	Each Independent Trustee who serves as a committee chair of the Board’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee or Nominating and Governance Committee receives an additional annual fee of $20,000, $15,000 and $15,000, respectively. The committee chair fee for any new committee chair is prorated for the initial year.


 


	 	·	The Lead Independent Trustee receives an additional annual cash retainer fee of $17,500 for serving in this role.


 


	 	·	Each Trustee receives a grant of 7,000 of the Company’s common shares of beneficial interest on the date of the first Board meeting following each annual meeting of shareholders (or, for Trustees who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first Board meeting attended).


 


	 	·	The Company generally reimburses all Trustees for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Trustees and for out of pocket costs incurred in connection with their attending certain continuing education programs.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 2 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 2

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
     relating to contributions and expenditures intended to affect 
                               elections.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

   Mr. Deutch (for himself, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Raskin, and Mr. Katko) 
  submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
     relating to contributions and expenditures intended to affect 
                               elections.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. To advance democratic self-government and political 
equality, and to protect the integrity of government and the electoral 
process, Congress and the States may regulate and set reasonable limits 
on the raising and spending of money by candidates and others to 
influence elections.
    ``Section 2. Congress and the States shall have power to implement 
and enforce this article by appropriate legislation, and may 
distinguish between natural persons and corporations or other 
artificial entities created by law, including by prohibiting such 
entities from spending money to influence elections.
    ``Section 3. Nothing in this article shall be construed to grant 
Congress or the States the power to abridge the freedom of the 
press.''.
                                 <all>
```
1023.48
SHARON KELLER CoURT OF CRIMINAL ApPEALS Abel Acosta

RO. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION 512TM55,

LAWRENCE E. MEYERS AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

CHERYL JOHNSON ' S1AN R. SCHILHAB

MIKE KEASLER general COUNSEL

BARBARA P. HERVEY 512-463-1597

ELSA ALCALA

BERT RICHARDSON

KEVIN P. YEARY

DAVID NEWELL

JUDGES

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

301 Fannin, Room 245

Houston, Texas 77002

April 8, 2015

RE: David Austin Price

Trial Court Number 1368261

COA# 14-13-00487-CR

Case Number PD-0176-15

Dear Clerk:

The Sealed Reporter's Record is being returned to you in the above referenced cause.

Please call if you have any questions.

Very truly yours,

Abel Acosta

Chief Deputy Clerk

Supreme Court Building, 201 West 14th Street, Room 106, Austin, Texas 78701

website: www.txcourts.gov/cca
Food and Nutrition Service Overview

Lauren A. King-Dillon

Senior Technical Advisor, USDA Foods Operations Division
USDA Food Assistance Programs 

Growing

• Nearly $1 billion in CCC purchased in FY23 and 

another nearly $1 billion just announced for FY24

• Over $600M approved in Section 32 so far in FY23

• About $250M for LPF

• Estimated $450M in TEFAP purchases

• About $120M for LPF

• Over $100M for DGO

• Another approximately $200M for CSFP and FDPIR

• Over $30M for LPF

• Over $65M for DGO
Communication is Key

•Product Availability

•Logistics Constraints

•Solicitation Schedule

•Timely Delivery

•Shipping and Receiving
USDA Foods Database

USDA Foods Database leverages GS1 Global 

Data Synchronization Network (GDSN®) to 

make nutrition, allergen, and ingredient 

information available for USDA Foods 

products for National School Lunch Program 

(NSLP) participants.

https://www.fns.usda.gov/usda-fis/usdafoods-database
USDA Foods Nutrition Profiles

• USDA Foods offers a wide variety of lower sodium, sugar and fat 

options to support schools in serving meals that meet the 

nutritional requirements

• All vegetables and beans offered through USDA Foods are low- sodium or no salt added

• Meats, fish, and cheese have sodium formulations equal to or 

lower than commercial standards

• USDA Foods canned fruits are in extra light syrup or water

• Specifications for USDA Foods processed end products are 

determined by school districts during the bid process
Always Improving

• Better meet our customer demands

• Updating product specifications

• Adding new items

• Aligning offerings to meet availability and needs

• Staying up to date on changing recipient and industry needs.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 56 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 56

Directing the President to terminate the use of the United States Armed 
Forces with respect to the military intervention led by Saudi Arabia in 
                         the Republic of Yemen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2019

Mr. Amash submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Directing the President to terminate the use of the United States Armed 
Forces with respect to the military intervention led by Saudi Arabia in 
                         the Republic of Yemen.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress directs the 
President to terminate the use of the United States Armed Forces with 
respect to the military intervention led by Saudi Arabia in the 
Republic of Yemen not later than the end of the period of 30 days 
beginning on the date of the enactment of this joint resolution unless 
and until a declaration of war or specific authorization for such use 
of the Armed Forces has been enacted into law.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered April 10, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00074-CR

RAYFORD HIGH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-57938-Y

ORDER

Appellant’s March 30, 2015 motion to supplement the clerk’s record is GRANTED. 

We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FOURTEEN DAYS of the 

date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s docket sheet.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
/<

I K f (h f J / 1STCOURTOF APPEALS - / - ( -^ J ' ' HOUSTON. TEXAS i7o zfir^-hCoufi Orf 4pjf& % APR -9 2015

Di"l4-tP4^"3-^T^ CHR.S10ft.ER APRINE . , .. ..-.. „CPSJdty.. -,-

/ **/

-C7"

fjL/lp£/A

ziS- /^QJ^2/^. „£M_

_a /Xbrh

t>kDj^Cc -LLC—

C&4&T

lO^lfk ^

€tprn i.

77/

^

fA

P(^j^iome^

4
/

/ a/so mirf

/S

^^i < dJ

0£ AV1' £rf/2f/' ^ >F</ ^^

<c .^o^ CjhsC O^l^i <?i

£ iC_£x r>:-^ ZZL

/

hs

/

A J l)0

-QUI *~s

PS>p 4^ ^->, ''/

. fr3*'<£- Lf

,••'-)

t/

~t / h£s) <-£&<.
*

/-U/S /fWz. S^VAtv 1^31%$

Pc^ Lyncher ,

k

RECEIVED 1

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS I HOUSTON, TEXAS

APR - 9 2015

ICHRISTOPHER A. PRINE |

ICLERK.

1/9 0u/

7"?0Q2KOSGiS-9 »»ll«J»J«'tflW'Hll'i)w»U
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending August 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Harpreet Singh Sangha, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date:  November 5, 2006 | /s/ Harpreet S. Sangha
Harpreet Singh Sangha
Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Douglas Lake Minerals Inc. and will be retained by Douglas Lake Minerals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
No. 03-15-00011-CV

IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS

CLAIRE TREVARTHEN

Appellant

V

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, PAMELA CIRKIEL, 

AUCTION.COM, HELEN G. KINNEMAN, JEREMIAH MCCLAIN 

and SHAMICA THOMAS

Appellees

Appeal from the 26th District Court of Williamson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-0187-C26

APPELLANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME

DAVID ROGERS

Texas Bar NO. 24014089

Law Office of David Rogers

1201 Spyglass Suite 100

Austin, TX 78746

(512) 923-1836 [Phone]

(512) 201-4082 [Fax]

(512) 777-5988 [Fax]

Firm@DARogerslaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

ACCEPTED

03-15-00011-CV

4807250

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/8/2015 12:49:31 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:49:31 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
No. 03-15-00011-CV

IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS

CLAIRE TREVARTHEN

Appellant

V

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, PAMELA CIRKIEL, 

AUCTION.COM, HELEN G. KINNEMAN, JEREMIAH MCCLAIN 

and SHAMICA THOMAS

Appellees

Appeal from the 26th District Court of Williamson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-0187-C26

APPELLANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME

Comes now Appellant, Claire Trevarthen, and files this, her unopposed 

motion for extension of time and would show the court as follows:

1. The deadline to file Appellant’s Brief is April 8, 2015.

2. Counsel for Appellant has unexpectedly had deadlines moved up in a 

civil case that, by its nature, is already an expedited proceeding in the 

District Court of Travis County. As such, counsel is unable to meet 

the current deadline in this case.
3. Counsel for Appellant would request an extension of time of 12 days, 

or until April 20, 2015, to file his brief. 

4. This is Appellant’s second request for time.

5. This motion is unopposed.

PRAYER

Appellant would respectfully move this Court to allow her an extension 

of 12 days to file Appellant’s Brief, or until April 20, 2015. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

/s/ David Rogers

DAVID ROGERS

Law Office of David Rogers

State Bar No. 24014089

1201 Spyglass Drive, Suite 100

Austin, TX 78746 

Firm@darogerslaw.com

(512) 923-1836

(512) 201-4082 (fax)

(512) 777-5988 (fax)

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE 

I hereby certify that on April 8, 2015 I contacted counsel for Appellees 

regarding my intent to file this motion. Counsel indicated they were 

unopposed to the filing of this motion.

/s/ David Rogers

DAVID ROGERS
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Appellant’s 

Motion was served upon counsel of record for Appellees on this 8th day of 

April, 2015 via this Court’s online filing system. 

B. David L. Foster

John Ellis

Locke Lord

600 Congress Avenue

Suite 2200

Austin, TX 78701

__/s/__David Rogers___________

David Rogers

SBN 24014089

Law Office of David Rogers

1201 Spyglass Suite 100

Austin, TX 78746

Firm@darogerslaw.com

(512) 923-1836

(512) 201-4082 [Facsimile]
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
FalconTarget, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the
fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

FalconTarget, Inc.

Date: May 15, 2006

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan

Serge Atlan

Chairman

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
[No. 17786-2-II.

Division Two.

June 28, 1996.]

#### Karen J. Callahan, *Individually and as Personal Representative, Appellants,*v. State Farm Life Insurance Company, *Respondent.*

*Bertha B. Fitzer,*for appellants.

*Michael J. Gainer*and *Julin, Fosso, Sage, McBride & Mason,*for respondent.

Bridgewater, J.

Karen J. Callahan appeals from the grant of State Farm’s motion for summary judgment, which ordered that coverage for the suicide of Michael E. *808Callahan was limited to the amount of limited death benefits previously tendered by State Farm. We hold that the "issue date” is unambiguous and affirm.

The Callahans purchased a life insurance policy from State Farm. Under its terms, if the insured died by suicide within two years of the *issue date*of the policy, death benefits would be limited to premiums paid minus any dividends. This provision is permitted by RCW 48.23.260, which authorizes insurers to limit liability in that precise fashion. 1 The policy stated that March 2, 1989, was the *issue date.*The Callahans applied for insurance on January 16, 1989; a premium notice was dated February 1, 1989; and the policy was issued on March 2, 1989 — the *issue date.*Mr. Callahan committed suicide on February 13, 1991 — within two years of the issue date. Mrs. Callahan filed a declaratory judgment action, and State Farm prevailed on a motion for summary judgment.

We review this action de novo. *Adams v. Thurston County,*70 Wn. App. 471, 474-75, 855 P.2d 284 (1993). We also construe insurance contracts de novo. *See State Farm Gen. Ins. Co. v. Emerson,*102 Wn.2d 477, 480, 687 P.2d 1139 (1984). Where the policy language is clear and unambiguous, the court may not modify the contract or create an ambiguity where none exists. *Morgan v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.,*86 Wn.2d 432, 435, 545 P.2d 1193 (1976).

Mrs. Callahan argues that "issue date” is ambiguous and invites the use of another date, the date of the premium notice for purposes of construing the suicide clause. She contends that because there are several dates listed in the policy ("policy date,” "anniversary date,” "ef*809fective date,” and "issue date”), "issue date” is ambiguous. However, the "issue date” is clearly set forth as March 2, 1989, without verbiage. It could not be more clear; there is no ambiguity as to when the suicide clause would begin to run. The argument concerning ambiguity is meritless. In addition, there is no claim or evidence of bad faith, fraud, or delay in State Farm issuing the policy.

We affirm.

Morgan and Armstrong, JJ., concur.

1

 RCW 48.23.260 states in pertinent part:

(1) The insurer may in any life insurance policy . . . limit its liability to a determinable amount not less than the full reserve of the policy and of dividend additions thereto in event only of death occurring:

Ob) As a result of suicide of the insured, whether sane or insane, within two years from the date of issue of the policy.
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 89 

Withdrawing approval of the Agreement Establishing the World Trade 

Organization. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2020 

Mr. DEFAZIO (for himself and Mr. PALLONE) submitted the following joint 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Withdrawing approval of the Agreement Establishing the 

World Trade Organization. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Congress withdraws its approval, provided under 

4 section 101(a) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, of 

5 the WTO Agreement as defined in section 2(9) of that 

6 Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

LAWRENCE WHITAKER,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 581 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.