alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### steam_record - Fw: ICR Deadline Extension Request - Big Rivers Electric Corporation

-----Forwarded by Jezebele Alicea/DC/ USEPA/US on 07/02/2010 08:31PM -----

To: Jezebele Alice a/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: Mark Bertram <Mark.Bertram@bigrivers.com>
Date: 06/30/2010 03:13PM Subject: ICR Deadline Exte nsion Request - Big Rivers Electric Corporation

Alicea

,

Attached is a letter requesting a 60-d ay extension to the current ICR Ques tionnaire deadline for all Big Rivers

facilities. It should be noted that HMP&L Station Two is owned by the City of Henderson, but operated by Big Rivers Electric Corporation.

Please do not hesitate to contact me s hould you have any questions or concerns.

Sincerely,



### Mark W. Bertram

Environmental Supervisor

Big Rivers Electric Corporation
201 Third Street Henderson, Kentucky 42420 (270) 844-6176 (270) 869-7815 cell

The information contained in this transmission is intended only fo r the person or entity to which it is directly addressed or c opied. It may contain material of confidential and/or private nature. Any review, retransmission, di ssemination or other use of, or taking of any action in relia nce upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is not a llowed. If you receive this message and the information contained therein by error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your/any storage medium. 

### From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: <steam

_ record @ er g .com>, < j ordan.ronald @ e p a. g ov> Date: 7/2/2010 7:32 PM Subject: Fw: ICR Deadline Extension Request - Big Rivers Electric Corporation
Attachments: ICR Extension Request.pdf 

### Pa g e 1 of 1

4/14/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C2E3EC8D

...
#### John Z. MARDESICH, Appellant, v. Charles J. MARCIEL and Lucy Marciel, Appellees.

No. 74-3338.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 14, 1976.

Daniel C. Olney, of Olney, Levy, Kaplan & Tenner, Wilimington, Cal., for appellant.

Herbert R. Lande, of Manns, Manns & Lande, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellees.

*

The Honorable E. Avery Crary, Senior United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation.

OPINION

Before ELY and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and CRARY,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Mardesich instituted a personal injury suit under 46 U.S.C. § 688 (the Jones Act) and general maritime law. After a non-jury trial, the District Court entered a judgment for Mardesich in the amount of $13,-000. Mardesich appeals, arguing that the District Court either refused to exercise *849discretion or abused its discretion in denying Mardesich’s motion for relief from his waiver of a jury trial under Fed.R.Civ.P. 39(b). Mardesich had never formally demanded a jury trial, as he had the right to do under the Jones Act. He requested to be relieved from his waiver at the. pre-trial hearing on the alleged basis of “slight oversight,” but the District Court denied the request. We affirm.

Mardesich wrongly characterizes the District Court’s decision as a failure to exercise discretion, when, as we see the facts, the District Court had virtually no discretion to exercise. The only reason advanced by Mardesich in support of his motion for relief was oversight or inadvertence in failing properly to demand a jury trial.

The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has adopted a rather stringent rule, holding that “[ujntimely requests for jury trial must be denied unless some cause beyond mere inadvertence is shown.” *Galella v. Onassis,*487 F.2d 989, 996 (2nd Cir. 1973). In adopting its position the Second Circuit has apparently been persuaded by a consistent line of district court cases denying relief based on mere inadvertence, effectively narrowing the allowable scope of the trial court’s discretion “to determining whether the moving party’s showing *beyond*mere inadvertence is sufficient to justify relief.” *See Noonan*v. *Cunard Steamship Co.,*375 F.2d 69, 70 (2nd Cir. 1967) (Emphasis in original).

Whatever the test that should be applied, it is clear from the record here that the District Court did not abuse its discretion, such as it had, in denying Mardesich relief from his waiver. *See Rutledge v. Electric Hose & Rubber Co.,*511 F.2d 668, 675 (9th Cir. 1975); *Tomlin v. Pope & Halbot Inc.,*282 F.2d 447, 449 (9th Cir. 1960).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 4.1



 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


240 Greenwich
Street, 22W Floor, New York, NY 10286


 


 


 


June 13, 2022


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust 572 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting
of the unit investment trust (the “Trust”) included in the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed
a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such
securities as of close of business on June 10, 2022, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms
and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations
of the Trust securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-263559) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect
to the registration of the sale of the Units of the Trust and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/  Margarita
Kalantarova


Margarita Kalantarova


Vice President
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 23


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Company of our report dated February 5, 1999,
included in the 1998 Annual Report to Shareowners of Brown & Sharpe
Manufacturing Company.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Brown & Sharpe
Manufacturing Company listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based
on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to
above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 2-33676, 2-56821, 2-60398, 2-77219, 2-77575, 2-83637, 2-97935, 
33-17831, 33-23601, 33-23603, 33-30927, and 33-54496) pertaining to employee
benefit plans, of Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Company of our report dated
February 5,1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
incorporated herein by reference, and our report included in the preceding
paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.



                                         ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Providence, Rhode Island
March 22, 1999
```

                                                                      Exhibit 32

    CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
    REQUIRED BY SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of
the  undersigned  officers of BNS  Holding,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation  (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

      (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended October 31,
2006 (the "Form 10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the  requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information  contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

      Date: January 29, 2007

                                    /s/ Michael Warren
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    Michael Warren
                                    Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer

      The foregoing  certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States  Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-KSB or as a separate  disclosure document for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to BNS Holding, Inc. and will be retained by BNS Holding, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
```

[Federal Register: September 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 169)]
[Notices]               
[Page 53732]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01se10-119]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7142]

 
In the Matter of the Designation of Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan 
(TTP) Also Known as Tehrik-I-Taliban Pakistan Also Known as Tehrik-e-
Taliban Also Known as Pakistani Taliban Also Known as Tehreek-e-Taliban 
as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of 
Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the organization known as Tehrik-e 
Taliban Pakistan (TTP), also known as Tehrik-I-Taliban Pakistan, also 
known as Tehrik-e-Taliban, also known as Pakistani Taliban, also known 
as Tehreek-e-Taliban, committed, or poses a significant risk of 
committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. 
nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the 
United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: August 12, 2010.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-21853 Filed 8-31-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
Test Kit Evaluation Submission Form 

The applicant must fill out the submission form and provide it along with the submission 

packet. The information provided in the submission form will be used in creating the 

certificate if the test kit meets all FGIS requirements; therefore, it is imperative that the 

form be filled out correctly. A fillable version of this form is available on the AMS Website.

Contact Information 

Applicant (i.e., test kit manufacturer)

Street Address

City, State, Zip Code

Contact Person

Phone Number

Email Address

Billing Address 

(if different than manufacturer’s address)

City, State, Zip Code

Test Kit Information 

Test Kit Name

Product Identification Number

Test Method Format

Reader Name

Reader Model or Identification Number

Detection Method

Upper Conformance Limit

Additional Commodities 

(list in alphabetical order)
Test Kit Evaluation Submission Form (continued) 

Design Criteria and Performance Specification Check List

The test kit meets the performance requirements and submission packet 

components are included. 

Initials 

Time for completion of analysis ≤ 30 minutes

FGIS reference method or equivalent used for reference analyses (validation report or 

literature reference provided if FGIS reference method not used)

Accuracy study for naturally contaminated corn from 100 – 1000 ppb zearalenone

Additional accuracy data for optional extension of upper limit of conformance above 

1000 ppb zearalenone in corn

Data supporting accuracy of multiple ranges of quantitation

Additional commodities – accuracy data; sample preparation and analytical procedure 

is described for each additional commodity (including grinding procedure); type of 

reference material is given (naturally-contaminated or standard-solution fortified)

Use of the test kit does not expose the employees to toxic or hazardous substances 

higher than OSHA Standards per 29 CFR when used without a fume hood or respirator. 

Use of the test kit does not generate radioactive waste, P-listed hazardous waste, or 

hazardous waste listed for its toxicity characteristic as defined in 40 CFR

Safety Data Sheets (SDS)

Reader electromagnetic field study certification statement (renewals exempt if same reader)

Temperature sensitivity study

Shelf life study

Certificates of analysis for reference materials

Written test kit instructions (provided as Microsoft Word document)

Method flow chart is included (optional)

Protocol & Notification Agreement Statement signed by applicant

Comments
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 53 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 53

 Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall for an event to commemorate 
the 400th anniversary of the arrival of the first African slaves to the 
             territory that would become the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2019

  Mrs. Watson Coleman submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
      which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall for an event to commemorate 
the 400th anniversary of the arrival of the first African slaves to the 
             territory that would become the United States.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT COMMEMORATING 400TH 
              ANNIVERSARY OF ARRIVAL OF FIRST AFRICAN SLAVES.

    Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be 
used on September 9, 2019, for an event to commemorate the 400th 
anniversary of the arrival of the first African slaves to the territory 
that would become the United States. Physical preparations for the 
ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 
Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.
                                 <all>
```
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

6/10/2015 COA No. 13-13-00471-CR

ZALMAN, DANIEL Tr. Ct. No. 57,007 PD-0261-15

On this day, the Appellant's petition for discretionary review has been refused.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

RICHARD L. MANSKE

121 E MONSERATTE ST

EL CAMPO, TX 77437-4423

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

6/10/2015 COA No. 13-13-00471-CR

ZALMAN, DANIEL Tr. Ct. No. 57,007 PD-0261-15

On this day, the Appellant's petition for discretionary review has been refused.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

13TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

DORIAN RAMIREZ

901 LEOPARD

CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78401

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

6/10/2015 COA No. 13-13-00471-CR

ZALMAN, DANIEL Tr. Ct. No. 57,007 PD-0261-15

On this day, the Appellant's petition for discretionary review has been refused.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

DISTRICT ATTORNEY WHARTON COUNTY

ROSS M. KURTZ

100 S. FULTON, SUITE 100

WHARTON, TX 77488

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

6/10/2015 COA No. 13-13-00471-CR

ZALMAN, DANIEL Tr. Ct. No. 57,007 PD-0261-15

On this day, the Appellant's petition for discretionary review has been refused.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

LISA MCMINN

STATE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY

P.O. BOX 13046

AUSTIN, TX 78711

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Kenneth Stastny, certify that: 

1. I havereviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Wise Metals Group LLC; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter covered by this report (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 21, 2007
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Rashad Lee, Appellant

No. 06-14-00112-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 76th District Court of 

Morris County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

10,947CR). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error related to the judgment of 

conviction entered in this matter. Because we lack jurisdiction to hear appellant’s point of error 

concerning the trial court’s Order to Withdraw Funds, we dismiss his second point of error for 

want of jurisdiction. 

We note that the appellant, Rashad Lee, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs 

of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 9, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 506

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION IV

No. CV-13-57

CLIFFORD RICH

APPELLANT

V.

QUALSERV CORPORATION and

THE HARTFORD INSURANCE CO.

APPELLEES

Opinion Delivered September 18, 2013

APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

COMMISSION 

[NO. F903764]

AFFIRMED

RITA W. GRUBER, Judge

In Qualserv v. Rich, 2011 Ark. App. 548, an appeal brought by Qualserv, we affirmed

a decision of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission in which it found that

Clifford Rich’s exposure to carbide dust in the workplace temporarily aggravated his preexisting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Mr. Rich brings the present appeal

from a subsequent decision of the Commission on his claims for disability benefits and

additional medical treatment. He contends that there is no substantial evidence to support (1)

the Commission’s finding that the aggravation ended March 3, 2010, foreclosing entitlement

to additional medical treatment; or (2) its determination that he is not entitled to additional

temporary-disability benefits. We disagree and affirm. 

The issue before the Commission in the present case was whether Mr. Rich’s 2008

compensable injury, a temporary aggravation of his pre-existing COPD, resulted in

subsequent entitlement to temporary total-disability benefits and additional medical treatment. 
Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 506

 The Commission noted that the temporary aggravation was caused by Mr. Rich’s inhaling

carbide dust in the workplace; that the exposure ceased when he left employment in 2009;

that he had a thirty-year history of heavy cigarette smoking before the temporary aggravation;

that Dr. Richard Melin was unable to causally relate Rich’s current breathing problems to the

2008 aggravation; and that both Dr. Melin and the advanced practical nurse testified that

COPD is a progressive disease, that there is no cure, and that shortness of breath is one of its

symptoms. 

The appellate court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commission’s

decision, which will be affirmed when it is supported by substantial evidence; we will affirm

if fair-minded persons with the same facts before them could have reached the conclusions

of the Commission. Parker v. Comcast Cable Corp., 100 Ark. App. 400, 269 S.W.3d 391

(2007). Because the sole issue before us concerns the sufficiency of the evidence to support

the Commission’s findings, and because the Commission’s opinion adequately explains the

decision, we affirm by memorandum opinion. In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301,

700 S.W.2d 63 (1985). 

Affirmed. 

HIXSON and WOOD, JJ., agree.

Walker, Shock & Harp, PLLC, by: Eddie H. Walker, Jr., for appellant.

Smith, Williams & Meeks, LLP, by: Charles H. Crocker, Jr. and Gene Williams, for

appellees.

2