alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 98 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal 

the twenty-third article of amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 6, 2020 

Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota submitted the following joint resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to repeal the twenty-third article of amendment 

to the Constitution of the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 98 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The twenty-third article of amendment 

3 to the Constitution of the United States is hereby re4 pealed. 

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress shall have the power to en6 force this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

I, Russell C. Taylor, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of Cellu Tissue Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.               TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended November 24,2005  fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in such QuarterlyReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | January 6, 2006                   |   | /s/ Russell C. Taylor |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------|--------|
|   | Russell C. Taylor                      |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
### Transport Transports Canada Canada TP 7245E



# AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

The following airworthiness directive (AD) may be applicable to an aircraft which our records indicate is registered in your na me. ADs are issued pursuant to Canadian Aviation Regulation (CAR) 521 Division X . Pursuant to CAR 605.84 and the further details of CAR Standard 625, Appendix H , the continuing airworthiness of a Canadian registered aircraft is contingent upon compliance with all applicable ADs. Failure to comply with the requirements of an AD may invalidate the flight authorization of the aircraft. Alternative means of compliance shall be applied for in accordance with CAR 605.84 and the above-referenced Standard

. This AD has been issued b y the Continuin g Airworthiness Division ( AARDG ) , National Aircraft Certification Branch, Trans p ort Canada, Ottawa, tele p hone 613 952-4357.

Pursuant to CAR 202.51 the registered owner of a Canadian aircraft shall, within seven days, notify the Minister in writing of any change of his or her name or address. To request a change of address, contact the Civil Aviation Communicat ions Centre (AARC) at Place de Ville, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N8 , or 1-800-305-2059 , or www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/communications/centre/ address.asp
2 4-0022 ( 01-2005 ) 

### 1/1 No

. 

### CF-2014-10 Issue Date 

### 12 February 2014

Number: CF-2014-10 Subject: Main Landing Gear - Brake Hydraulic Line - Incorrect Connection Effective: 26 February 2014 Applicability: Bombardier Inc. model CL-600-2B19 aeroplanes, serial numbers 7003 and subsequent. Compliance: Within 6600 hours air time from the effective date of this AD, but no later than 29 March 2017. Background: Cases of inboard and outboard hydraulic brake lines connected to the incorrect port of the swivel assembly on the main landing gear were found in service, including a runway overrun event. Cross-connected brake hydraulic lines can cause the brakes and/or the anti-skid system to operate in correctly. During a high speed rejected take-off, inability for the brakes to operate correct ly could be catastrophic. This AD mandates the modification to pr event inadvertent cr oss-connection of the inboard and outboard hydraulic brake lines. Corrective Actions: Incorporate the modification in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin (SB) 601R-32-110, dated 19 December 2013, or la ter revisions approved by the Chief, Continuing Airworthiness, Transport Canada. Authorization: For the Minister of Transport, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Philip Tang Acting Chief, Continuing Airworthiness Contact: Helen Tsai, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613-952-4357, facsimile 613-996-9178 or e-mail AD-CN@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.
FILE COPY

THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Post Office Box 12248

Austin, Texas 78711

Mr. Gregory D. Smith

Ramey & Flock, P.C.

100 East Ferguson, Suite 500

Tyler, TX 75702

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

(512)463-1312

Tuesday, April 07, 2015

Mr. David M. Gunn

Beck Redden LLP

1221 McKinney Street, Suite 4500

Houston, TX 77010-2010

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 13-0986

Court of Appeals Number: 12-11-00370-CV

Trial Court Number: 06CV-29005

FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS

12th Court nf Appeals District

I

Style: SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY | v.

TOBY BERRY-HELFAND AND GERY MUNCEY

Dear Counsel:

TEXA^

CATHY S. LUSK,

Today the Supreme Court of Texas granted the motion for extension of time to file

petitioner/s reply brief in the above-referenced case. Petitioner, Southwestern Energy Production

Company's reply brief is due to be filed in this office on Tuesday, May 07, 2015. FURTHER

REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE

DISFAVORED.

PLEASE NOTE pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(c)(2) all documents (except documents

submitted under seal) must be e-filed through eFileTexas.gov. You may file up to midnight on

the due date.

Please note all notices or communication about this case will be sent by email in lieu of

mailing paper documents. (See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.2(c)(7)).

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Patrick D. Passmore, Deputy Clerk

cc: Ms. Lori Oliver
THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Post Office Box 12248

Austin, Texas 78711

Ms. Cathy S. Lusk (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

FILE COPY

(512)463-1312
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar Wendell TRIGGS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 80SA154.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

June 16, 1980.

J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Hennessey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Mary J. Mullarkey, Sol. Gen., Kathleen M. Bowers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-ap-pellee.

J. Gregory Walta, Colorado State Public Defender, llene P. Buchalter, Deputy State Public Defender, Denver, for defendant-appellant.

QUINN, Justice.

The defendant appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief, contending that he is entitled to resentencing under the presumptive sentencing provisions of the 1977 version of House Bill 1589. Colo. Sess. Laws 1977, ch. 216, 18-1-105 at 867. We affirm the judgment.

The defendant pled guilty to second-degree burglary, a class three felony, section 18-4-203, C.R.S.1973 (now in 1978 Repl.Vol. 8), and on March 14, 1977, he was sentenced to the Colorado State Penitentiary for a term of fourteen to twenty years, consecutive to any sentence then being served. The defendant appealed his sentence as excessive and the court of appeals affirmed the sentence. We granted certiorari and also affirmed the sentence. *Triggs v. People,*197 Colo. 229, 591 P.2d 1024 (1979). Thereafter, the defendant filed a motion for post-conviction relief, alleging that he was entitled to re-sentencing under House Bill 1589, Colo.Sess.Laws 1977, ch. 216, 18-1-105 at 867.1 The trial court denied the motion without a hearing.

The issues raised on this appeal are identical to those decided in *People v. McKenna,*Colo., 611 P.2d 574 (S.Ct.No. *31879SA165, announced May 5, 1980). *McKen-na*held that the legislative postponement of the effective date of House Bill 1589 comported with the separation of powers doctrine under Article III of the Colorado Constitution. *McKenna*also held that the prospective provisions of section 25 of House Bill 1589, as amended in March 1979, Colo. Sess. Laws 1979, ch. 157, section 25 at 672, did not constitutionally infringe upon the rule making power of this court under Article VI, Section 21, of the Colorado Constitution.

Because the defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief raised questions of law only, the trial court properly could render a summary disposition of the motion without a hearing. *E. g., People v. Johnson,*195 Colo. 350, 578 P.2d 226 (1978); *People v. Trujillo,*190 Colo. 497, 549 P.2d 1312 (1976); ABA Standards Relating to Post-Conviction Remedies § 4.5(a).

The judgment is affirmed.

1

. The effective date of H.B. 1589 was subsequently postponed from July 1, 1978, to April 1, 1979, Colo.Sess. Laws 1978, First Extraordinary Session, ch. 1, and later to July 1, 1979. Colo.Sess. Laws 1979, ch. 157, section 25 at 672.

The presumptive sentence for a class three felony was four and one-half years under the *3181977 version of H.B. 1589. Colo.Sess. Laws 1977, ch. 216, 18-1-105 at 867. In March 1979 the General Assembly enacted an amended presumptive sentencing law and the presumptive range of sentence for a class three felony is now four to eight years. Colo.Sess. Laws 1979, ch. 157, 18-1-105 at 669.
NO. 07-01-0501-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	JANUARY18, 2002

	______________________________

	IN RE DENNIS HOOD, RELATOR

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	By this original proceeding, relator Dennis Hood, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the judge of the 181st District Court of Potter County to issue a bench warrant for him to return to Potter County for a new trial after his conviction was reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings on April 29, 1997.  For the reasons expressed herein, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

	Pursuant to this Court’s request, the State filed a response to relator’s petition indicating that relator’s case is presently set for trial at the March or April 2002 docket.  The State also attached certified copies of an Application for Bench Warrant and Bench Warrant to have relator brought before the 181st District Court of Potter County for a hearing on February 4, 2002.  Inasmuch as the relief sought to be compelled by relator’s petition has been performed, this proceeding is moot and this Court will not issue a meaningless writ.  Continental Oil Company v. Lesher, 500 S.W.2d 183, 186 (Tex.Civ.App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 1973, no writ); see also Correa v. First Court of Appeals, 795 S.W.2d 704, 705 (Tex. 1990) (holding that appellate courts do not decide cases in which no controversy exists between the parties). 

	Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot.

						Don H. Reavis

						    Justice

Do not publish.
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending February 28, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Laurence Stephenson, President (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company and Steven Johnston, Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date:  April 29, 2005 | /s/ Laurence StephensonLaurence Stephenson
President (Principal Executive Officer)
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  April 29, 2005 | /s/ Steven JohnstonSteven Johnston
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)        

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Douglas Lake Minerals Inc. and will be retained by Douglas Lake Minerals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Exhibit 32.1 Certificate:



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

OF SHIWANA, INC.



I, the undersigned, being the one of the co-chief executive officers, respectively, of Shiwana, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best of his information, knowledge
and belief, that (1) the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)) and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: September 12, 2005



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Tim R. Sensenig       
|Tim R. Sensenig           
|Title:                    
|Co-Chief Executive Officer
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 18 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to prohibit 

Members of Congress from receiving compensation for any period during 

which a Government shutdown is in effect. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. NORMAN (for himself, Mr. OLSON, Mr. POSEY, Mr. KEVIN HERN of Oklahoma, Mr. CURTIS, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. WALTZ, 

and Mr. BERGMAN) submitted the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to prohibit Members of Congress from receiving 

compensation for any period during which a Government 

shutdown is in effect. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 18 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. A Representative or Senator may not 

5 receive compensation with respect to any period during 

6 which a Government shutdown is in effect. For purposes 

7 of this article, a Government shutdown shall be considered 

8 to be in effect if there is a lapse in appropriations for any 

9 Federal agency or department as a result of a failure to 

10 enact a regular appropriations bill or continuing resolu11 tion. 

12 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress shall have the power to en13 force this article through appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 128 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1520 

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the 

4 following correction: 
2 

•HCON 128 EH 

1 Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘Making further con2 tinuing appropriations for fiscal year 2021, and for other 

3 purposes.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 21, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 128 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives 

1520. to make a correction in the enrollment of H.R.
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending November 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Laurence Stephenson, President (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company and Steven Johnston, Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date:  December 21, 2004 | /s/ Laurence StephensonLaurence Stephenson
President (Principal Executive Officer)
|------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  December 21, 2004 | /s/ Steven JohnstonSteven Johnston
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)        

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Douglas Lake Minerals Inc. and will be retained by Douglas Lake Minerals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
EXHIBIT 10.1 


 





Amendment
No. 1 to the 


Joint
Venture and Territorial License Agreement by


and
between Ildar Gainulin and Maria Belova and GBT Technologies Inc.


 


This
Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Venture and Territorial License Agreement is made as of the 16th day of June 2022, between Ildar
Gainulin and Maria Belova (“Ildar/Maria”) and GBT Technologies, Inc. (“GBT”).



 


WHEREAS,
the parties entered into Joint Venture and Territorial License Agreement effective June 10, 2022 (the “Agreement”).


 


WHEREAS,
the parties desire to amend the Agreement to further define the constitution of the Board of Directors.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:


 


		1.	Section
                                                                                                                            4.2
                                                                                                                            of
                                                                                                                            the
                                                                                                                            Agreement
                                                                                                                            is
                                                                                                                            hereby
                                                                                                                            amended
                                                                                                                            and
                                                                                                                            restated
                                                                                                                            as
                                                                                                                            follows:



 


Board
of Directors. Until such time that the Company closes its initial public offering (the “IPO”), the Company will
be managed by the Board in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and Applicable Law. The Board shall initially consist of
two (2) Directors, one of whom shall be appointed by IGMB and one shall be appointed by GBT.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement as of the date first above written.


 








	 	 
	Ildar Gainulin	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Maria Belova	 
	 	 
	GBT Technologies Inc.	 
	 	 
	By:	 	 
	Name: 	Mansour Khatib	 
	Title: 	CEO
STATEOFDELAWAREDEPARTMENTOFNATURALRESOURCES &ENVIRONMENTALCONTROL DivisioN

OF AIR

& WASTE MANAGEMENTAIRQUALITYMANAGEMENT

156
S.STATESTREETTELEPHONE: (302)739-9402SECTIONDOVER,DELAWARE19901FxNo.: (302)739-3106 March

12, 2008 Ms. Judith Katz (3APOO)

RE CE \I .D Director Air Protection Division,-, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region. 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia,

PA 19103 Dear M>: This letter

is in reference

to Delaware’s December

13, 2007 State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision entitled, “State Implementation

Plan Revision
For Ozone, Fine particulate Matter (PM 25 ), and Visibility.”
This SIP revision, which was subject

to public notice and comment, addressed

the requirements

of Clean Air Act (CAA) Section

11 0(a)(2)(A)-(M)

that are relevant

to the eight-hour ozone and fine particulate matter (PM 2 . 5 ) National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).

The purpose

of this letter

is to:

1) clarify the information provided

in that SIP revision under the discussion

of 11 0(a)(2)(D)(i)(II),

and 2) certify

as to Delaware’s compliance
with CAA Sections

1 10(a)(2)(C)

and (J) for PM 25 , and that the substantive requirements

of CAA Sections

1 10(a)(2)(C)

and (J) arc addressed

in Delaware’s December

13, 2007 SIP revision. The SIP, under the discussion

of 11 0(a)(2)(D)(i)(II),
makes the statement, “Major sources
are subject

to NNSR and PSD permitting programs implemented

in accordance
with EPA

‘s interim guidance callingfor

use ofPMjoas

a surrogate
for PM 25 related

to nonattainment

and PSD NSR program requirements.”

I would like to clarify that the “interim guidance” referred

to is the April

5, 2005 Steven

D. Page memorandum entitled “Implementation

of New Source Review Requirements

in PM 2 . 5 Nonattainment Areas,” and the October

23, 1997 John Seitz memorandum entitled “Interim Implementation

of New Source Review Requirements

for PM 2 . 5 ” In addition

to the above clarification,

this letter

is also intended

as
a certification

of Delaware’s compliance
with CAA Sections

1 10(a)(2)(C)

and (J) for PM 2 . 5

It is Delaware’s De€a4’ae

‘a 9ood Taiae Vefteid4

ORECYCLEDPAPERc’Ms.JudyKatzMarch12,2008PageTwounderstandingthattheabovestatementissufficientforpurposesofdemonstratingcompliancewithCAASections110(a)(2)(C)and(J)forPM2.5Therefore,Delawareherebysubmitsthiscertification,forpurposesofdemonstratingcompliancewithCAASections110(a)(2)(C)and(J)forPM25,acknowledgingthat:theStateofDelawareisfollowingEPA’sPM10surrogateguidancedocuments,specifically,theApril5,2005,StevenD.Pagememorandumentitled“ImplementationofNewSourceReviewRequirementsinPM2.5NonattainmentAreas,”andtheOctober23,1997JohnS.Seitzmemorandumentitled“InterimImplementationofNewSourceReviewRequirementsforPM2.5,”referencedtherein.Thankyouforyourconsiderationofthisclarifyinginformation.Ifyouhaveanyquestionsorwouldliketodiscussthismatterfurther,pleasecontactRonAmirikianormeat(302)739-9402.Sincerely,AliMirzakhalili,P.E.Administratorcc:RonAmirikian