alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32-2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Lexington Precision Corporation,
a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the President, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the undersigned's knowledge:

     (1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                           /s/  Warren Delano
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Warren Delano
                                           President
                                           (Co-Principal Executive Officer)
                                           March 30, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification will not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference.
1 The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-3013

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Sergio Medina-Olvera, * [UNPUBLISHED] a/k/a Sergio Olvera Medina, * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: February 11, 2003 Filed: April 8, 2003

___________ Before WOLLMAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Sergio Medina-Olvera (Medina) pleaded guilty to possession with the intent to distribute over 500 grams of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B) and was sentenced to ninety months’ imprisonment. 1 In entering his plea, Medina reserved his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress evidence that was seized from his residence and vehicle pursuant to a search warrant. After-2- reviewing the record and the parties’ arguments, we are satisfied that the information included in the warrant application and affidavit was sufficient to support a finding of probable cause for the issuance of the warrant. Because we believe that an extended recitation of the facts and the applicable legal principles would have no precedential value in this fact-intensive case, we affirm without any further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Office of Fossil Energy, Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Notice of Renewal.

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to Section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and (Pub. L. 92-463),                               ( print page 2715)                            and in accordance with Title 41, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 102.365(a), and following consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the National Petroleum Council has been renewed for a two-year period, beginning January 12, 2012. The Council will provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary of Energy on matters relating to oil and natural gas, and the oil and natural gas industries.                    

Additionally, the renewal of the Council has been determined to be essential to the conduct of the Department's business and to be in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the Department of Energy by law and agreement. The Council will continue to operate in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and the rules and regulations in implementation of that Act.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Nancy Johnson at (202) 586-6458.

Issued at Washington, DC, on January 12, 2012.

Carol A. Matthews,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-950 Filed 1-18-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of ABC Funding, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Harold Barson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

  1.   The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and result of
       operations of the Company.


/s/ Harold Barson___
Harold Barson
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
May 11, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 204A14

FILED 10 April 2015

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

v.

HOWARD JUNIOR EDGERTON

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of 

the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 759 S.E.2d 669 (2014), vacating a judgment

entered on 21 March 2013 by Judge Gary M. Gavenus in Superior Court, Rutherford

County, and remanding for a new trial. Heard in the Supreme Court on 24 February 

2015.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Teresa M. Postell, Assistant Attorney General, 

for the State-appellant.

Michael E. Casterline for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of 

Appeals is reversed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration 

of defendant’s remaining issues on appeal.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                    5
<LEGEND>
                                             (Page 59)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                 0000013191
<NAME>                                Boonton Electronics
<MULTIPLIER>                          1
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            121,620
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,051,887
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                     1,306,115
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                2,894,005
<PP&E>                                          2,315,854
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,781,831
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  4,487,848
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,290,859
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          163,659
<OTHER-SE>                                      2,285,637
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    4,487,848
<SALES>                                         7,209,057
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                7,209,057
<CGS>                                           4,140,099
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,997,113
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (7,322)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 47,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    31,344
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                31,344
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       31,344
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .02
        

</TABLE>
THE BICKHAM LAW FIRM

Attorney at Law

3120 Southwest Freeway, Suite 650

Houston, Texas 77098

 

DAVID A. BICKHAM Telephone: 713/789-4361 

Board Certified Personal Injury Trial Law Facsimile: 713/523-1816 

 Texas Board of Legal Specialization BICKHAM LAW FIRM@YAHOO.COM

April 9, 2015

Mr. Christopher A. Prine Via E-File

Clerk of the Court

1

st District Court of Appeals

301 Fannin Street

Houston, TX 77002

Re: Case No. 01-15-00180-CV, Mychele Reed, et al. v. Jerry Wayne Squier, et al.; In the 1st

Court of Appeals, Houston, Texas.

Dear Mr. Prine:

All parties have agreed to a mediation session before Ms. Nancy Huston, 3555 Timmons, Suite 640,

Houston, TX 77027. The mediation will occur around the 1st week of May, 2015.

By copy of this letter, we are notifying all counsel of record. We will report back to the Court at the

conclusion of the mediation session.

Very truly yours,

David A. Bickham

David A. Bickham

DAB/skm

ACCEPTED

01-15-00180-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/9/2015 5:14:25 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/9/2015 5:14:25 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
“SCI moving forward in the 21st Century using technology, innovation, and old fashioned hard work” 

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

September 24, 2013

AMENDMENT NO. 4

COMMODITY SPECIFICATION FROZEN VEGETABLES 

FEBRUARY 2012

The purpose of this amendment is to revise the size requirement for frozen, individually 

quick frozen (IQF) mushrooms by eliminating the under 3/8 inch size for uniformity,

and hydration of the mushrooms. This revision applies to Section II., Individual 

Commodity Specifications, L. Frozen IQF Mushrooms, 3. Size, and 7. Hydration.

3. Size: 3/8 inch.

Fairly uniform in size and shape, not more than 15 percent by weight of the 

units may be more than 3/8 inch.

7. Hydration:

Mushrooms shall not be hydrated.

All other terms and conditions remain the same.

Agricultural Marketing 

Service

Fruit and Vegetable 

Program

Specialty Crops 

Inspection Division

1400 Independence 

Avenue, SW. 

Room 1536-S,

Stop 0240 

Washington, DC 

20250-0240

Phone: 202.720.5870

Fax: 202.720.0393
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, filed on the date hereof with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: August 5, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    Arthur L. Buser 
|                     |  |  |  | Arthur L. Buser        
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  | 
|Date: August 5, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    Kenneth E. Cruse
|                     |  |  |  | Kenneth E. Cruse       
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1  Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    The undersigned hereby certifies, in my capacity as an officer of NSTAR Electric Company, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:(i)the enclosed Annual Report of NSTAR Electric Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(ii)the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NSTAR Electric Company.Dated: February 15, 2008/s/ THOMAS J. MAY
Thomas J. May
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 9, 2015

NO. 03-14-00390-CV

Charles P. Akin, D.D.S., Appellant

v.

State Board of Dental Examiners, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on May 27, 2014. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The appellant 

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-79 Specification

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 July 8, 2019

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 1 of 2

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Niman Ranch Natural Beef Program

G-79 Specification

1 REQUIREMENTS

Beef carcasses certified under this specification shall meet the following requirements:

a. Classed as Steer or Heifer carcasses only1

;

b. U.S. Prime or Choice and have a minimum marbling score of Modest 01

;

c. Less than 30 months of age with lean color, texture, and firmness, meeting the requirements for 

A maturity in the U.S. grade it qualifies for1;

d. Medium or fine marbling texture1,2

;

e. Moderately thick or thicker muscling and tend to be at least moderately wide and thick in 

relation to their length3;

f. No hump exceeding 2 inches in height4;

g. Practically free (not detracting from visual quality) of capillary rupture in the ribeye muscle; 

and

h. Free of “dark cutting” characteristics.

2 CERTIFICATION

Carcasses to be examined for compliance with this specification shall be clearly identified and 

presented to an AMS grader for certification. Certification procedures for identification, the removal 

of preliminary identification marks (or other methods of control) from non-qualifying carcasses, and 

control of certified carcasses shall be in accordance with established Quality Assessment Division 

(QAD) procedures.

3 LABELING

Labeling of products derived from certified carcasses must follow Food Safety and Inspection Service 

regulations and policy guidelines and QAD procedures.

 1 Determined in accordance with the “Official United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef.” 2 Evaluated using the USDA-AMS-LS-SB-02 Marbling Texture card (included in the Official USDA Marbling Photographs.) 3 Muscle thickness is evaluated by averaging the thickness of the various parts, considering not only the proportion of each part of the 

carcass but also the general value of each part. Superior muscle thickness implies a high proportion of meat to bone and a high 

proportion of the weight of the carcass in the more valuable parts.

4 Measured from a line formed by the extension of the top line (including the fat) and measuring the lean muscle (excluding the fat) 

perpendicular to that line in the center of the hump.
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-79 Specification

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 July 8, 2019

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 2 of 2

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

4 FEES

The costs of all grading and certification services performed by an AMS grader involving 

examinations, supervision, official documentation, and related services shall be borne by the person, 

group, or plant requesting the service.

___________________________________

Chad Nelson, National Meat Supervisor

Quality Assessment Division

Livestock & Poultry Program
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-144 Specification

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 May 25, 2021

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 1 of 2

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Agri Star Wagyu and Iowa Best Beef Wagyu

G-144 Specification

1 REQUIREMENTS

Beef carcasses certified under this specification shall meet the following requirements:

a. Genotypic requirements of the American Wagyu Association’s (AWA) Live Animal 

Specification.

b. Classed as Steer and Heifer carcasses only1;

c. U.S. Prime, Choice and Select, and have a minimum marbling score of Slight00 1;

d. Lean color, texture, and firmness, meeting the requirements for A or B maturity in the U.S. 

grade it qualifies under1;

e. No hump exceeding 2 inches in height2;

f. Practically free (not detracting from visual quality) of capillary rupture in the ribeye muscle; 

and

g. Free of “dark cutting” characteristics.

2 CERTIFICATION

Carcasses to be examined for compliance with this specification shall be clearly identified and 

presented to an AMS grader for certification. Certification procedures for identification, the removal 

of preliminary identification marks (or other methods of control) from non-qualifying carcasses, and 

control of certified carcasses shall be in accordance with established Quality Assessment Division 

(QAD) procedures.

3 LABELING

Labeling of products derived from certified carcasses must follow Food Safety and Inspection Service

(FSIS) regulations 9 CFR part 317 and policy guidelines found at FSIS: Labeling/Label Approval

website and FSIS: Claims Guidance website and QAD procedures including QAD 107: Requirements 

for Grading Terms on Meat Product Labeling. Wagyu Beef forequarters, when meeting Rabbinical 

Slaughter and Kosher Standards will be processed and identified as AGRISTAR Kosher product and 

with IOWA BEST BEEF product not being identified as kosher. 

4 FEES

The costs of all grading and certification services performed by an AMS grader involving 

examinations, supervision, official documentation, and related services shall be borne by the person, 

group, or plant requesting the service.

1 Determined in accordance with the “Official United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef.” 2 Measured from a line formed by the extension of the top line (including the fat) and measuring the lean muscle (excluding the fat) 

perpendicular to that line in the center of the hump.
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-144 Specification

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 May 25, 2021

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 2 of 2

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

___________________________________

Chad Nelson, National Meat Supervisor

Standards and Specifications Division

Livestock & Poultry Program
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BOOMERS' CULTURAL  DEVELOPMENT,  INC.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2005,  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Lorena Jensen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                  /s/ Lorena Jensen
                                                  ---------------------------
Date: October 11, 2005           Lorena Jensen
                             Chief Financial Officer
January 18, 2012 

Mr. Joe Mastruserio 

3068 Daytona Avenue 

Cincinnati, OH 45211 

Dear Mr. Mastruserio: 

Thank you for your suggestion concerning a standard system of warning lights on aircraft. 

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued a final rule addressing the issues you raise in your 

letter. A copy is enclosed. If after you have reviewed the rule you find further amendments are needed, 

you should formally petition the FAA for Rulemaking. In your petition you must address the following: 

 An explanation of your proposed action, its purpose, and why your proposed action would be in 

the public interest, 

 The language you propose for a new or amended rule, or the language you would remove from 

the current rule, 

 Information and arguments that support your proposed action, including relevant technical and 

scientific data available to you, and 

 Any specific facts or circumstances that support or demonstrate the need for the action you 

propose. 

Enclosed is a copy of 14 CFR § 11.71 which describes the petition process. 

A copy of your suggestion has been placed in Docket No. FAA-2011-1384. Please include this docket 

number in any further communication on this subject. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda D. Courtney 

Manager, Office of Rulemaking 

 Aircraft and Airport Rules Division 

Enclosures