alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, Peter
J. Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31,
2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable, and that information contained
in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Prestige Brands Holdings,
Inc.




/s/
      Peter J. AndersonName:
                            Peter
      J. AndersonTitle:
                            Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:
                            February 9,
      2009
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 76 (Thursday, April 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9423]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[NRC-2012-0070]


Updated Aging Management Criteria for Reactor Vessel Internal 
Components of Pressurized Water Reactors

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Draft interim staff guidance; Request for public comment; 
Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) 
is supplementing a notice published in the Federal Register on March 
20, 2012 (77 FR 16270), that requested public comments on draft license 
renewal interim staff guidance (LR-ISG), LR-ISG-2011-04, ``Updated 
Aging Management Criteria for PWR Reactor Vessel Internal Components.''
    The original notice provided the ADAMS Accession Number for the 
main body of LR-ISG-2011-04 but did not include accession numbers for 
Appendices A and B of the LR-ISG. This supplement provides the 
appropriate ADAMS Accession Numbers for the LR-ISG in its entirety, and 
does not change any other information in the original notice for public 
comment.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Evelyn Gettys, Division of License 
Renewal, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-4029; email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#034675666f7a6d2d446677777a70436d71602d646c75"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2c695a49405542026b495858555f6c425e4f024b435a">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 20, 2012 (77 FR 16270), the NRC 
published a notice requesting public comments on draft LR-ISG-2011-04, 
``Updated Aging Management Criteria for PWR Reactor Vessel Internal 
Components.'' In that publication on page 16271, first column under the 
section titled ``SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Accessing Information and 
Submitting Comments; A. Accessing Information,'' second bulleted point 
delete ``Draft LR-ISG-2011-04 is available electronically under ADAMS 
Accession No. ML12004A149. Replace deletion with ``The body for Draft 
LR-ISG-2011-04 is available electronically under ADAMS Accession No. 
ML12004A149 and Appendices for Draft LR-ISG-2011-04 are available 
electronically under ADAMS Accession No. ML12004A150.''

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day of April, 2012.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Mark S. Delligatti,
Deputy Director, Division of License Renewal, Office of Nuclear Reactor 
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2012-9423 Filed 4-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
The State 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Thursday, April 9, 2015

No. 04-14-00181-CR

Michael A. RIVAS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-04-10954-CR

The Honorable Camile G. Dubose, Judge Presiding

ORDER

 The State’s brief was originally due December 31, 2014. On January 5, 2015, the State 

filed a motion to extend time to file its brief, asking for a ninety-day extension. We granted the 

State’s motion, but advised the State that no further extensions would be granted absent written 

proof of extraordinary circumstances. Accordingly, the State’s brief was due March 31, 2015, 

but it was not filed. On April 6, 2015, the clerk’s office of this court called the State regarding 

the status of the State’s brief. In response, the State filed a second motion for extension of time, 

asking for an additional thirty days to file its brief. After reviewing the motion, we find the State 

has demonstrated extraordinary circumstances with regard to its second request for an extension 

of time. Accordingly, we GRANT the State’s motion and ORDER the State to file its brief on 

or before April 30, 2015. THE STATE IS ADVISED THAT NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS 

OF TIME TO FILE ITS BRIEF WILL BE GRANTED.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                       CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Ted Kozub,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of Quantum
Energy inc. (the "Company"),  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:


(i)   the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
      ended November 30, 2006 (the  "Quarterly  Report") fully complies with the
      requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and


(ii)  the information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

By:

           -------------------------------------------
Name:      Ted Kozub
Title:     Chief Executive Officer and
           Chief Financial Officer
Date:      January 12 , 2006







This  written  statement  is being  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB.  A
signed  original of this  statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.


This certification  accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall  not,  except to the
extent  required  by such Act, be deemed  filed by the  Company for  purposes of
Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as amended (the  "Exchange
Act").  Such  certification  will not be deemed to be  incorporated by reference
into any filing under the  Securities  Act of 1933, as amended,  or the Exchange
Act,  except to the extent  that the  Company  specifically  incorporates  it by
reference.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00777

- CV

MIRAMAR DEVELOPMENT CORP. and John Hawkins,

Appellants

v.

Aaron M. SISK

, Appellee

From the 236th Judicial District Court, Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 236

- 248030

- 10

The Honorable Thomas Wilson Lowe III, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE MARION , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED. It is ordered that appellee Aaron M. Sisk recover his costs of this appeal from

appellants Miramar Development Corporation and John Hawkins.

SIGNED April 23, 2014.

_____________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 127 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 127

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 133 the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall make the following correction:
     Amend the title so as to read: ``Making consolidated 
appropriations for the fiscal year ending September

              

 30, 2021, providing coronavirus emergency response and relief, and for 
other purposes.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 21, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 127

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

     Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a 
               correction in the enrollment of H.R. 133.
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Amendment No.1 to the Quarterly Report of Ignis Petroleum Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Geoff Long, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

| (1)         | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                         |
|-------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  

(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

 

| Date:  | April 17, 2008 | /s/ Geoff Long          |   |
|--------|----------------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |           | Geoff Long              |   |
|   |           | Chief Financial Officer |   |
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David DAddario, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wise Metals Group LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2006

| |  |                                     
| |  | ------------------------------------
| | 
| |  | /s/ David DAddario                 
| |  | David DAddario                     
| |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
J. 

persons without prior approval, used drugs, failed to pay supervision fees, 

and was convicted of a subsequent felony. The evidence shows that 

Morales's conduct was not as good as required by the conditions of 

probation, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion 

by revoking his probation rather than taking an alternative action. See 

NRS 176A.630 (identifying actions the court may take upon determining 

probationer violated a term of probation). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

Act_t vetzt, 

Hardesty 

as..;1,14 

Douglas 

J. 

cc: Hon. Elliott A. Sattler, District Judge 

Washoe County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A
Defects IADM Weevil Damage OCL Bleach CSC

Count Min: 0.1 0.0 Min: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2

36 Max: 50.9 0.8 Max: 0.0 10.0 0.5 24.6 9.7

Avg: 6.46 0.05 Avg: 0.00 0.87 0.10 2.60 1.74

US #1 US #2 US #3 SG Count US #1 US #2 US #3 SG

16 7 1 12 37 18 7 2 10

48.6% 18.9% 5.4% 27.0%

Defects IADM Weevil Damage OCL Bleach CSC

Count Min: 1.2 0.0 Min: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

8 Max: 26.1 0.0 Max: 0.0 72.5 4.3 0.6 95.0

Avg: 9.85 0.00 Avg: 0.00 1.70 0.06 0.06 3.77

US #1 US #2 US #3 SG Count US #1 US #2 US #3 SG

3 1 -- 4 177 72 42 19 44

Defects IADM Damage Splits

Count Min: 0.1 0.0 Min: 0.1 0.9

28 Max: 50.9 0.8 Max: 34.8 66.1

Avg: 5.50 0.07 Avg: 5.80 7.48

US #1 US #2 US #3 SG Count #1 #2 #3 SS

13 6 1 8 19 9 3 2 5

47.4% 15.8% 10.5% 26.3%

Grade results based on Damage only, not Total Defects

NORTH DAKOTA

FAQ Summary - 2019

9/27/2019

Lentils-North Dakota (total)

Lentils-North Dakota (9/64)

Lentils-North Dakota (12/64)

SGDP - North Dakota

SYDP - North Dakota

Chickpeas (Garbanzo Bean) - North Dakota
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 685 

To authorize testimony and representation of Senate employee in United 

States v. Adam Albrett, etc. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 12, 2018 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize testimony and representation of Senate 

employee in United States v. Adam Albrett, etc. 

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Adam Albrett, etc., 

Cr. No. 18–312, pending in the United States District 

Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the government has requested testimony from Sam Frazier, an employee in the office of Senator Dianne Feinstein; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent Members, officers, and employees of the Senate 

with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their official responsibilities; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no eviVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:04 Oct 12, 2018 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR685.ATS SR685

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 685 ATS 

dence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate; and 

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or 

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will 

promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Sam Frazier, an employee in the Of2 fice of Senator Dianne Feinstein, is authorized to testify 

3 in the case of United States v. Adam Albrett, etc., except 

4 concerning matters for which a privilege should be as5 serted. 

6 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to 

7 represent Mr. Frazier in connection with the testimony au8 thorized in section one of this resolution. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# durumglb
#### Robert PENN, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

No. 3873.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

Dec. 29, 1978.

Hugh W. Fleischer, Rice, Hoppner & Hedland, Fleischer & Ingraham, Anchorage, for appellant.

John A. Scukanec, Asst. Dist. Atty., Joseph D. Balfe, Dist.. Atty., Anchorage, and Avrum M. Gross, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellee.

Before RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice, CONNOR, BOOCHEVER, BURKE and MATTHEWS, Justices.

OPINION

CONNOR, Justice.

This is a sentence appeal from a conviction for assault and battery and robbery. The superior court imposed a sentence of six months for assault and battery, ten *289years for robbery, with the two sentences to run concurrently. Five years of the sentence was suspended, with appellant to be on probation, and appellant was to be eligible for parole at the discretion of the Parole Board, after serving at least one third of the period of confinement imposed. Appellant asserts that the superior court improperly relied on his juvenile record in sentencing, that the court relied on unverified information in the presentence report, and that the sentence is excessive.

As to the reliance on his juvenile record,1 Penn argues that Criminal Rule 32(c)(2), which provides for inclusion in pre-sentence reports of any finding of delinquency, is in conflict with the right to privacy 2 and with the provisions of AS 47.10.-080(g), which provides that no adjudication of delinquency shall afterward be deemed a criminal conviction, and that such an adjudication shall not be admissible against the minor in a subsequent case in any court. We have considered appellant’s arguments, and we are not convinced that our previous decisions on this question should be altered.

In both *Davenport v. State,*543 P.2d 1204 (Alaska 1975), and *Berfield v. State,*458 P.2d 1008 (Alaska 1969), we held that consideration of the juvenile record was proper by the court imposing a sentence upon an adult offender. Courts in other states have held similarly. *State v. Nobriga,*56 Haw. 75, 527 P.2d 1269, 1271 (1974); *People v. McFarlin,*389 Mich. 557, 208 N.W.2d 504 (1973). *See also*Anno., 64 A.L.R.3d 1291. Use of the juvenile history of the offender in sentencing proceedings does not amount to the use of those proceedings as evidence against the offender within the proscription of such a statute. *Young v. State,*553 P.2d 192, 196-97 (Okl.Cr.App.1976). *Davenport v. State, supra*and *Berfield v. State, supra,*are still the law in Alaska.

As to the contention that the superior court impermissibly relied on unverified information in the presentence report, our examination of the record convinces us that this point is without merit.

As to the excessiveness of the sentence, our review leads us to the conclusion that, in imposing this sentence, the superior court was not clearly mistaken.3

AFFIRMED.

1

.As a juvenile, Penn committed matricide, and was adjudicated as delinquent, based on that act.

2

. Alaska Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 22.

3

. *McClain v. State,*519 P.2d 811, 813-14 (Alaska 1974).
**Certifications**

 

 

I, Paul Vanderslice, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reportson Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by thisreport on Form 10-K, of BMO 2022-C1 Mortgage Trust (the “Exchange Act PeriodicReports”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports,taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicingand other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliancestatement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, andexcept as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicers havefulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all materialrespects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included asan exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably reliedon information provided to me by the following unaffiliatedparties: KeyBank National Association; CWCapital Asset Management LLC;Situs Holdings, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; Computershare TrustCompany, National Association; Wilmington Trust, National Association; SCP Servicing LLC; Midland Loan Services, a Divisionof PNC Bank, National Association; LNR Partners, LLC; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC;Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC.

 

 

Date: March 29, 2024

 

/s/ PaulVanderslice                                                    

Paul Vanderslice

Chief Executive Officer, BMO Commercial Mortgage SecuritiesLLC

(senior officer in charge of securitization of thedepositor)