alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                     |   | Three Months Ended |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                     |   | September 30, 2011 |   |   |
|                                                                                     |   |               |   |   |
|                                                                                     |   |               |   |   |
| Income available to common stockholders                                                  |   | $                  | 2,018  |   |   |
|                                                                                     |   |               |   |   |   |
| Weighted average shares outstanding                                                      |   |               | 66,961 |   |   |
|                                                                                     |   |               |   |   |   |
| Basic earnings per share                                                                 |   | $                  | 0.03   |   |   |
|                                                                                     |   |               |   |   |   |
| Income for diluted earnings per share                                                    |   | $                  | 2,018  |   |   |
|                                                                                     |   |               |   |   |   |
| Total weighted average common shares and equivalents outstanding for diluted computation |   |               | 66,961 |   |   |
|                                                                                     |   |               |   |   |   |
| Diluted earnings per share                                                               |   | $                  | 0.03   |   |   |
|                                                                                     |   |               |   |   |   |
1517 WEST FRONT STREET SUITE 354 TYLER, TX 75702 TEL: 903-593-8471 FAX: 903-593-2193

Serving Anderson, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith, Trinity, Upshur, Van 

Zandt and Wood Counties

www.12thcoa.courts.state.tx.us

CHIEF JUSTICE

JAMES T. WORTHEN

JUSTICES

BRIAN HOYLE

GREG NEELEY

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

CLERK

CATHY S. LUSK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

MARGARET HUSSEY

April 7, 2015

Ms. Lois Rogers

District Clerk, Smith County

Courthouse, Suite 204

100 North Broadway Avenue

Tyler, TX 75702-7201

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 12-15-00023-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 114-0391-13

Style: Darryl Earl Daniels, Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

Pursuant to Rule 18.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, enclosed herewith is the 

Mandate issued in the above cause. When the District or County Clerk has executed the 

Mandate in accordance with the opinion of this Court, the Clerk is requested to fill in the 

information below and to return the attached copy to this office.

Very truly yours,

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:_____________________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

C

C

:

Mr. Austin R. Jackson (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Michael J. West (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mandate executed on __8th day of ___April__________, 2015.

Brief explanation of action taken: ___Scanned_________________________________

______________LINDA RHYMES_________________________________District/County Clerk

FILE COPY

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 4/8/2015 2:16:54 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
|   |                    |   |   |   |   | RIDGEWOOD ENERGY L FUND, LLC                    |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: |   May 7, 2010 | By:    | /s/    |   |   | ROBERT E. SWANSON                                    |
|   |                    |   | Name:  |   |   | Robert E. Swanson                                    |
|   |                    |   | Title: |   |   | Chief Executive Officer                              |
|   |                    |   |   |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                        |
|   |                    |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
|   |                    |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
| Dated: |   May 7, 2010 | By:    | /s/    |   |   | KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |                    |   | Name:  |   |   | Kathleen P. McSherry                                 |
|   |                    |   | Title: |   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                    |   |   |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer)                        |
|   |                    |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
|   |                    |   |   |   |   |                                                 |

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 9, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00511

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF V.H., et al children,

From the 166th Judicial Distri ct Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- PA

- 00098

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s , C.B., Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED . The

appellant ’ s brief is due November 16, 2015.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of November, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Longhai Steel, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Chaojun Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
            /s/
      Chaojun WangChaojun
      WangChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)




Date:
August 13, 2010
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETiNG ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR

REFRIGERATED BEVERAGE VENDING MACHINES

U.S. Department of Energy

Room 1E-245

1000 independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20585

July 11, 2006

Purpose: The Department of Energy (DOE) is holding this informal public meeting as a first step in the

energy conservation standards rulemaking process for refrigerated bottled or canned beverage vending

machines. This meeting is intended to familiarize stakeholders with the assumptions, proposed

methodologies and analytical tools that DOE proposes to use in its standards-development process, and

solicit feedback. Further, DOE seeks to discuss issues relevant to establishing energy conservation

standards for refrigerated beverage vending machines. In addition, DOE is interested in receiving

information and data that it should consider in its analysis of refrigerated beverage vending machines.

9:00 -9:05 am Welcome

9:05 - 9:15 am Opening Remarks, introductions, and Agenda Review

9:15 - 9:45 am introduction and Analytical Methodology

9:45 - 10:30 am Market and Technology Assessment

10:30 -10:45 am Break

10:45 am - 12:00 pm Screening Analysis and Engineering Analysis

12:00 - 1:00 pm Break for Lunch

1:00 -2:15 pm Markups for Equipment Price Determination, Energy Use

Characterization and Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis

2:15 - 2:45 pm Shipments Analysis and National Impact Analysis

2:45-3:OOpm Break

3:00 - 3:15 pm Revisions to ANOPR analyses and LCC Subgroup Analysis

3:15 - 3:30 pm Manufacturer Impact Analysis

3:30 - 4:00 pm Utility Impact Analysis, Employment Impact Analysis,

Environmental Assessment, and Regulatory Impact Analysis

4:00 - 4:45 pm Other Issues and Comments / Closing Remarks

4:45 pm Adjournment

EERE-2006-STD-0125 COMMENT 09
#### John Johnson, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error.

(Supreme Court of Florida, *En Banc,*

October 29, 1907).

*680Writ of Error to Criminal Court of Record, Duval county; John S. Maxwell, Judge.

No appearance for plaintiff in error.

W. H. Ellis, Attorney General for the state.

This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error. There was judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant takes writ of error. Dismissed on motion of counsel for defendant in error.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wise Metals Group LLC (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David DAddario, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 9, 2009



By:

/s/    David DAddarioDavid DAddarioChairman and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**
**Exhibit 31.3**

CERTIFICATION 

I, Max H. Mitchell,certify that: 

 
 (1)
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Crane Company;

 
 (2)
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
 (3)
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 
 (4)
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 
 a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 
 b)
[Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos.33-8238/34-47986 and 33-8392/34-49313];

 
 c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 
 d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 
 (5)
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions): 

 
 a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 
 b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

By /s/ Max H. Mitchell

Chief Executive Officer

March 30, 2023
**
1 The Honorable Charles B. Kornmann, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable John E. Simko, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of South Dakota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-3666

___________ Sandy Grodzin, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. Michael J. Astrue, * Commissioner of Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 21, 2010 Filed: April 28, 2010

___________ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Sandy Grodzin appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of widow’s insurance benefits. We grant Gr odzin leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Wildman v Astrue , 596 F.3d 959, 963-64 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review), we agr ee with the district court that the decision-2- at issue here is supported by substan tial evidence on the record as a whole. Accordingly, we affirm. See8th Cir. R. 47B.

_________________________
Rapier Family 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 6, 2015

No. 04-15-00105-CV

Mava HURD and Leonard Izzo,

Appellant

v.

RAPIER FAMILY FOUNDATION,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-14969

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellants’ first motion for extension of time to file their brief is GRANTED. 

Appellants’ brief is due on May 15, 2015.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

WILLIAM RONALD TROUT,

 Petitioner

 v.

JOAN A. TROUT,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 583 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
#### First National Bank in Greensburg, Admr., Appellant, *v.*Hershberger, Admrx.

Argued, October 26, 1942.

Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, Baldrige, Rhodes, Hirt and Kenworthey, JJ.

*538
      *Fred B. Trescher,*of *Kunlcle, Trescher & Snyder,*for appellant.

*Carroll Caruthers,*with bim *Frank A. Rugh,*for appellee.

December 8, 1942:

Pee Cueiam,

This was an action in assumpsit against a decedent’s estate on a judgment note for $1,700. The verdict was in favor of the plaintiff. The court granted a new trial, giving as its reason that the note in suit had been improperly admitted in evidence, because the signature of the decedent had not been sufficiently proved by competent, admissible evidence. Plaintiff appealed. ■ A certificate of the court below was filed setting forth that the new trial would have been refused but for that reason, and that in its opinion, that question controls the whole case.

The case was tried in the court below together with the case of Arra Hershberger, Administratrix e.t.a., d.b.n. of David M. Hershberger, deceased, against the same defendant, Mary Katherine V. Hershberger, Administratrix of Samuel W. Hershberger, deceased, on a like note for $3,000. Proof of the decedent’s signature to both notes was made by the same witnesses and the same exhibits. The verdict in that case was likewise for the plaintiff; but the court entered judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto on the ground that an alleged unexplained alteration upon the face of the note rendered it inadmissible in evidence. The plaintiff in that case appealed to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court, in an opinion by Mr. Justice Steen, (345 Pa. 439, 29 A. 2d 95), reversed and entered judgment for the plaintiff on the verdict; *539and in order to do So necessarily passed upon the question whether the signature of the decedent had been sufficiently proved, as well as upon the competency of the witnesses who testified in support of its authenticity, and decided. that the witnesses were competent and. that the signature had been sufficiently proved. The discussion in Mr. Justice Stern's opinion relating to this “further question” raised in the case — see the statement of the second question involved, as it appears in appellee’s brief in that case — effectually disposes of the questions involved in the present appeal and requires the reversal of the order granting a new trial and the entry of judgment for the plaintiff (appellant) on the verdict.

The order granting a new trial is reversed and judgment is directed to be entered for the plaintiff, on payment of the jury fee.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1070 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the dollar and 

income limitations on the deduction for student loan interest. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2019 

Mr. CICILLINE (for himself and Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the dollar and income limitations on the deduction for 

student loan interest. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Loan Interest 

5 Tax Deduction Expansion Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1070 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN DOLLAR LIMITATION AND INCOME 

2 LIMITATION ON STUDENT LOAN INTEREST 

3 DEDUCTION. 

4 (a) INCREASE IN DOLLAR LIMITATION ON STUDENT

5 LOAN INTEREST DEDUCTION.—Paragraph (1) of section 

6 221(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘$2,500’’ and inserting ‘‘$7,500 ($15,000 in 

8 the case of a joint return)’’. 

9 (b) INCREASE IN INCOME LIMITATION ON STUDENT

10 LOAN INTEREST DEDUCTION.—Paragraph (2) of section 

11 221(b) of such Code is amended to read as follows: 

12 ‘‘(2) LIMITATION BASED ON MODIFIED AD13 JUSTED GROSS INCOME.— 

14 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—No deduction shall be 

15 allowed under subsection (a) to a taxpayer with 

16 a modified adjusted gross income in excess of 

17 $100,000 (twice such amount in the case of a 

18 joint return). 

19 ‘‘(B) MODIFIED ADJUSTED GROSS IN20 COME.—The term ‘modified adjusted gross in21 come’ means adjusted gross income deter22 mined— 

23 ‘‘(i) without regard to this section and 

24 sections 199, 222, 911, 931, and 933, and 

25 ‘‘(ii) after application of sections 86, 

26 135, 137, 219, and 469.’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1070 IH

1 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (1) of 

2 section 221(f) of such Code is amended to read as follows: 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of a taxable 

4 year beginning after 2020, the $100,000 amount in 

5 subsection (b)(2)(A) shall each be increased by an 

6 amount equal to— 

7 ‘‘(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

8 ‘‘(B) the cost-of-living adjustment deter9 mined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar 

10 year in which the taxable year begins, deter11 mined by substituting ‘calendar year 2019’ for 

12 ‘calendar year 2016’ in subparagraph (A)(ii) 

13 thereof.’’. 

14 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after De16 cember 31, 2019. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1001 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1001

  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide a process by 
which a family member of a deceased individual who is eligible for the 
Department of Veterans Affairs burn pit registry may register for such 
             registry on behalf of the deceased individual.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2019

Mr. Castro of Texas (for himself, Mrs. Walorski, Ms. Gabbard, Mr. Ruiz, 
 Mr. Welch, Mr. Thompson of California, and Ms. Norton) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide a process by 
which a family member of a deceased individual who is eligible for the 
Department of Veterans Affairs burn pit registry may register for such 
             registry on behalf of the deceased individual.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Family Member Access to Burn Pit 
Registry Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR FAMILY MEMBERS TO REGISTER FOR DEPARTMENT OF 
              VETERANS AFFAIRS BURN PIT REGISTRY ON BEHALF OF DECEASED 
              ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUALS.

    Section 201 of the Dignified Burial and Other Veterans' Benefits 
Improvement Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-260; 38 U.S.C. 527 note) is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new 
        subsection (c):
    ``(c) Registration on Behalf of Deceased Individuals.--In the case 
of a deceased eligible individual, the Secretary shall provide a 
process by which an immediate family member of the individual may 
register for the burn pit registry under this section on behalf of the 
deceased eligible individual.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tengion, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Nichtberger, MD, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November 2, 2010




/s/ Steven Nichtberger, MD

Steven Nichtberger, MD


President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)