alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Office of the Secretary

                    Pursuant to Section 33105(c) of Title 49, United States Code, and the delegation of the Secretary of Transportation's responsibilities under that Act to the Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration (49 CFR, Section 501.2(a)(9)), the Secretary of Labor has certified to the Administrator and published this notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     that the United States City Average All Items Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (1967 = 100) increased 116.6 percent from its 1984 annual average of 311.1 to its 2011 annual average of 673.818.                

 Signed at Washington, DC, on the 12th day of April 2012.

Hilda L. Solis,

Secretary of Labor.

[FR Doc. 2012-9362 Filed 4-17-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-24-P
The GIAC encourages FGIS have continued communications with the Ag industry for consistency in 

official inspection results where concerns for Origin to Destination official inspection results or official 

weight variances may be observed. As part of this approach, FGIS should:

• Continue engagement with Ag industry stakeholders for improved transit time.

• Continued education and awareness of origin and destination request rights within the

standard for review inspections and sample retention.

• FGIS to evaluate the ability to provide the GIAC with data (e.g., a heat map) from the

last 12 months between Origin and Destination official grades to compare results.

• Engage industry (e.g., equipment manufacturers, technology platform providers, service

providers, etc.) to encourage a consistent standardization of data for all SaaS technology

(Software as a Service) for a future use of IT and data driven technology efficiency.

Within data management/efficiency, ensure data Security, Privacy, and Standardization

are taken into account.

GIAC RECOMMENDATION ORIGIN VS DESTINATION
The GIAC endorses recent progress by FGIS to establish a process for evaluating and certifying new 

technologies for use in the official grain inspection system. The GIAC encourages FGIS to develop a

strategy for identifying and implementing the appropriate technologies. In consideration of the need for 

new and more efficient technology, FGIS should: 

• Collaborate with FGIS and official agency personnel to identify priority issues.

• Communicate with grain industry stakeholders to invite feedback.

• Engage other industries and government agencies to learn how technology is being deployed to

address challenges that may have relevance to grain grading.

The findings should be reported at the next GIAC meeting for further discussion and recommendations.

GIAC RECOMMENDATION - TECHNOLOGY
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1350. DOROTHY TANNER v. PLIVA, INC. et al.

Pliva, Inc., Generics Bidco I, LLC, and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. filed

an application for interlocutory appeal from a trial court order granting in part and

denying in part its motion to dismiss. We granted the application on July 11, 2014,

and the applicants filed their notice of appeal on July 18, 2014. In a related case,

docketed as Case No. A15A1165, Dorothy Tanner filed a timely notice of crossappeal. The superior court forwarded to this Court the same notice of cross-appeal

filed by Tanner in Case No. A15A1165, but that case was docketed as Case No.

A15A1350, the instant case. As both cases pertain to the same lower court case

number, it appearsthe appeal in A15A1350 is duplicative of the appeal in A15A1165. 

Accordingly, this duplicative appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/31/2015

March 31, 2015
NUMBERS 13-14-00237-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

ISAAC SASTAITA, Appellee.

 

On appeal from the 105th District Court

of Kleberg County, Texas.

 

ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

The State perfected an appeal from an order granting a motion to suppress entered 

by the 105th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas, in cause number 12-CRF-0137. 

The State has filed a motion to abate and remand to the trial court for findings of fact and 

conclusions of law. 
2

On April 8, 2014, the trial court issued an order granting a motion to suppress. On 

April 14, 2014, the State filed a timely request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. 

The trial court has not made its findings of fact and conclusions of law in support of its 

decision to grant the appellee’s motion to suppress.

Upon the request of the losing party on a motion to suppress evidence, the trial 

court must make findings of fact and conclusions of law adequate to provide an appellate 

court with a basis to which to review the trial court’s application of the law to the facts. 

State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). If the trial court does not 

enter the findings of fact and conclusions of law within twenty days from its ruling on the 

motion to suppress, the intermediate appellate court must exercise its authority under 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 44.4, and remand the case to the trial court and order 

the trial court to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law. TEX. R. APP. PROC. 44.4; 

Cullen, 195 S.W.3d at 698-700.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the State’s motion, is of 

the opinion that the motion should be granted. Accordingly, we GRANT counsel’s motion 

to abate the present appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is 

ABATED and the cause REMANDED to the trial court. 

Upon remand, the trial court is instructed to make and file findings of fact and 

conclusions of law in support of its order granting the motion to suppress in this cause, 

as requested by the State in its motion filed April 14, 2014. See Cullen. The trial court 

shall cause its findings of fact and conclusions of law to be included in a supplemental 

clerk's record filed with the Court within thirty days from the date of this order. Should 
3

the trial court require more time to comply with this order, it shall request an extension 

prior to the expiration of this deadline.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 

8th day of April, 2015.
Electronic Invoicing

Requirements

Advance Shipping Notification (ASN)

Supporting Documents

Authorization to Pay

Payment Due Dates

Endrea.White@usda.gov
Electronic Invoicing

Requirements Details

4A52.232-80 Electronic Invoicing (June 2021)

• ASN as invoice (if ASN is required) - Contractor’s advance shipment 

notice (ASN), entered in WBSCM in accordance with 4A52.211-2, will 

serve as the contractor’s invoice, i.e., request for payment. Separate 

entry of an invoice using WBSCM’s Supplier Self Service is no longer 

required.

• ASN is not required on service contracts or some supplies (i.e., Raw 

Shelled Peanuts).
Electronic Invoicing

Supporting Documents

• Proof of product conformance—as required in the applicable commodity 

specifications document or solicitation—such as:

• Official checkloading certificate(s), and/or

• Certificate of Analysis (COA), and/or

• Certificate of Conformance (per FAR Clause 52.246-15), and/or

• AMS Commodity Inspection Certificate or Graders Memorandum.

• Any waivers granted by the Contracting Officer, if applicable.

• The Contracting Officer reserves the right to specify any combination of 

documents listed above to evidence proof of product conformance.

– ting that quantity received is good (see clause

• 4A52.247-3, Bill of Lading Notations, for required contents of a bill of lading.)
Electronic Invoicing

Authorization to Pay

• Authorization to pay. The Government will not review an invoice for payment 

until all required supporting documentation has been received. In addition to the 

items in paragraph (2) above, all invoice payments must be supported by a 

receiving report (proof of delivery). A recipient-entered 

• 30 

• WBSCM goods receipt will serve as the receiving report. The recipient (receiving 

official) should enter the goods receipt into WBSCM no later than the 2nd calendar 

day after delivery. 
Electronic Invoicing

Payment due dates
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wise Metals Group LLC (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David DAddario, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 15, 2006



|    |  |                                     
|--- |  | ------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ David DAddario                 
|    |  | David DAddario                     
|    |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 57 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating 

to the authority of Congress and the States to regulate contributions 

and expenditures in political campaigns and to enact public financing 

systems for such campaigns. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2019 

Mr. SCHIFF (for himself, Ms. NORTON, Mr. CARBAJAL, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. 

BLUMENAUER, Mr. WELCH, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. COHEN, and Mr. 

SERRANO) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relating to the authority of Congress and the 

States to regulate contributions and expenditures in political campaigns and to enact public financing systems 

for such campaigns. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 57 IH 

1 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

2 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

3 for ratification: 

4 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

5 ‘‘Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed to 

6 forbid Congress or the States from imposing reasonable 

7 content-neutral limitations on private campaign contribu8 tions or independent election expenditures, or from enact9 ing systems of public campaign financing, including those 

10 designed to restrict the influence of private wealth by off11 setting campaign spending or independent expenditures 

12 with increased public funding.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
[No. 19082-6-II.

Division Two.

August 16, 1996.]

#### Providence Ministries, *Appellant,*v. The City of Gig Harbor, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 94-2-08561-7, Thomas Felnagle, J., entered January 9, 1996. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished opinion per Seinfeld, C.J., concurred in by Morgan and Turner, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wise Metals Group LLC (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David DAddario, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 31, 2009



By:

/s/ David DAddarioDavid DAddario Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer


A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Zeno,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the  period  ended June 30,  2005 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


Date:  August 11, 2005


/s/ Frank McGill
------------------------------
Frank McGill
President, C.E.O. and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CelaneseHoldings LLC (the "Company") on Form10-Q for the period ending September  30, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, John J. Gallagher III,Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|          |                                                                                                                      |
|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|          |                                                                                                                                                    |
|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. |

Date: November 14, 2005

/s/ John J. Gallagher IIIJohn J. GallagherIIIVice President and Chief FinancialOfficer

----
---

USDA Agricultural 

~ 

1400 Independence Avenue, SW 

Marketing Room 2055-S, STOP 0201 

- Service Washington, D.C. 20250-0201 

April 28, 2023 

John T. Umhoefer 

Executive Director 

Wisconsin Cheese Makers Association 

5117 West Terrace Drive, Suite 402 

Madison, WI 53718 

Dear Mr. Umhoefer: 

Thank you for submitting the March 30, 2023, proposal on behalf ofthe Wisconsin Cheese 

Makers Association (WCMA), which requests that the U.S. Department ofAgriculture (USDA) 

hold a hearing to amend the 11 Federal milk marketing orders (FMMO). The WCMA proposal 

would amend the manufacturing (make) allowances contained in the Class III and IV price 

formulas, using the most recently available industry cost data. 

Your petition cites information obtained from a recent WCMA survey and indicates WCMA 

anticipates including the most current studies ofDr. Mark Stephenson published by AMS in 

2022, a new study that Dr. Stephenson is undertaking to update that study to take into 

consideration 2022- 2023 data, and a study by Dr. William Schiek, as evidence to revise 

manufacturing allowances. As precedent for requesting a hearing without specific, proposed 

make allowances, your letter cites two FMMO hearings held in the mid-2000's without specific 

make allowance values noticed for consideration. 

While the referenced hearings were requested without noticing specific make allowance values, 

rulemaking procedures have changed as a result ofthe 2008 Farm Bill, which amended Section 

8c ofthe Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 608c). The amendment directed the Secretary 

ofAgriculture (Secretary) to issue supplementary-rules ofpractice defming the guidelines and 

timefrarnes for the rulemaking process relating to amendments oforders. Specifically, the 

Secretary must evaluate a proposal and determine how to proceed within 30 days ofits receipt. 

As part ofthe evaluation, USDA assesses potential impacts ofadopting the proposed regulatory 

change. Without specific make allowance values to analyze, USDA cannot conduct such an 

analysis for use in evaluating potential impacts ofthe proposal. 

Therefore, USDA requests additional information regarding the specific make allowance values 

to be considered to assist the Secretary in deciding whether to initiate an FMMO rulemaking 

proceeding on this issue. 

Thank you in advance for providing this information. 

Sincerely, ~s:__ 

Bruce Summers 

Administrator 

An Equal Opportunity Em11loyer
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 23 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States extending 

the right to vote to citizens sixteen years of age or older. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2019 

Ms. MENG (for herself and Ms. SCHAKOWSKY) introduced the following joint 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States extending the right to vote to citizens sixteen 

years of age or older. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 23 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The twenty-sixth article of amendment 

3 to the Constitution of the United States is hereby re4 pealed. 

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. The right of citizens of the United 

6 States, who are sixteen years of age or older, to vote shall 

7 not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any 

8 State on account of age. 

9 ‘‘SECTION 3. The Congress shall have power to en10 force this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
**Certifications**

 

 

I, Paul Vanderslice, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reportson Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by thisreport on Form 10-K, of BMO 2023-5C2 Mortgage Trust (the “Exchange Act PeriodicReports”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports,taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicingand other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliancestatement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, andexcept as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicers havefulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all materialrespects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included asan exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably reliedon information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: KeyBank National Association; Greystone ServicingCompany LLC; BellOak, LLC; Computershare Trust Company, National Association;Wilmington Trust, National Association; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; MidlandLoan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; K-Star Asset Management LLC; and Park Bridge LenderServices LLC.

 

 

Date: March 29, 2024

 

/s/ PaulVanderslice                                                   

Paul Vanderslice

Chief Executive Officer, BMO Commercial Mortgage SecuritiesLLC

(senior officer in charge of securitization of thedepositor)