Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 220 / Thursday, November 14, 2013 / Notices 68439 

not the engine is located at a major 

source or area source. 

Abstract for [A130001]: 

C:\Documents and 

Settings\mmalave\Local 

Settings\Temp\wzc696\A130001.pdf. 

Q: The Asbestos Institute request 

clarification from EPA on whether the 

use of foam meet the ‘‘adequately wet’’ 

standard, as stated in the Asbestos 

NESHAP, 40 CFR part 61, subpart M? 

A: EPA determines that as long as the 

foam is applied as a liquid and 

sufficiently mixes with or penetrates the 

asbestos-containing material and 

prevents visible emissions, the use of 

such foam is acceptable in meeting the 

adequately wet requirement under the 

Asbestos NEHSAP M. The response is 

limited to this question regarding foam 

as a wetting agent. It is the 

responsibility of the owner or operator 

to meet other asbestos emission control 

requirements (also known as ‘‘work 

practice standards’’) during the 

demolition or renovation operation, as 

described in the EPA response letter. 

Abstract for [A130002]: 

C:\Documents and 

Settings\mmalave\Local 

Settings\Temp\wzc696\A130002.pdf. 

Q1: Cantey Hanger LLP request a 

determination for a client on whether 

only removing a 1500 foot section of the 

asbestos-containing material (ACM)- 

wrapped pipeline in a pipeline 

renovation project, while leaving the 

remainder of the non-friable ACMwrapped pipeline in the ground, 

transform the site into a waste disposal 

site under 40 CFR 61.154 of 40 CFR part 

61, subpart M (i.e., Asbestos NESHAP)? 

A1: No. The Asbestos NESHAP does 

not apply to undisturbed pipelines 

coated with ACM that remain in the 

ground following a renovation project, 

which is the described scenario in your 

request, as long as no asbestoscontaining waste material is deposited 

in the recently renovated area. This is 

consistent with a previously EPA issued 

applicability determination, ADI 

Control Number A030001 dated March 

6, 2003. 

Q2: If no additional ACM is deposited 

at the site for a year, would the site 

become an inactive waste disposal site 

per 40 CFR 61.154(g)? 

A2: Yes. If the renovated area does not 

receive asbestos-containing waste 

material, the site is not subject to the 

active waste disposal regulation at 40 

CFR 61.154, in general and 40 CFR 

61.154(g), specifically. Therefore, the 

inactive waste disposal requirement at 

40 CFR 61.151 of the Asbestos NESHAP 

does not apply. 

Abstract for [A130003]: 

C:\Documents and 

Settings\mmalave\Local 

Settings\Temp\wzc696\A130003.pdf. 

Q: Does 40 CFR part 61, subpart M 

(i.e., Asbestos NESHAP) apply to 

encapsulating wall board with spray 

foam insulation if the surface of the wall 

board will not be disturbed? 

A: EPA is unable to comment on 

whether encapsulating wall board with 

spray foam insulation would be 

compliant with the Asbestos NESHAP 

based on the limited on site-specific 

information provided in the request. 

However, if the work you are 

contemplating does not involve 

wrecking or taking out load-bearing 

structures (demolition) or altering one 

or more facility components, including 

stripping or removing regulated 

asbestos-containing material 

(renovation), then the Asbestos 

NESHAP for demolition and renovation 

operations does not apply to the 

proposed action. 

Abstract for [M130001]: 

C:\Documents and 

Settings\mmalave\Local 

Settings\Temp\wzc696\M130001.pdf. 

Q: Does EPA approve Valero 

Refinery’s (Valero) Alternative 

Monitoring Plan (AMP) for using a 

video camera to monitor a flare pilot 

flame in a control room and record the 

observation, in lieu of having an 

ultraviolet (UV) flame detector, as 

required by 40 CFR part 63 subpart CC, 

at Valero’s Three Rivers refinery in 

Texas? 

A: No. EPA does not approve Valero’s 

AMP since it determined that the 

equivalence of using a video camera that 

must be monitored by operations 

personnel in lieu of a continuous 

recording thermocouple or equivalent 

device was not demonstrated under 40 

CFR 60.18(1)(2). 40 CFR 63.644(a)(2) 

requires that a device that continuously 

detects the presence of a pilot flame 

must be used when the controlling 

device is a flare. 40 CFR 63.11(b)(5) 

requires that the monitoring device 

must be a thermocouple or equivalent 

device. A thermocouple has a 

continuous recording mechanism that is 

not dependent on operation or 

monitoring by personnel. 

Abstract for [M130002]: 

C:\Documents and 

Settings\mmalave\Local 

Settings\Temp\wzc696\M130002.pdf. 

Q: Is the propane dehydrogenation 

(PDH) plant located at the Dow 

Chemical Company, Texas Operations 

(Dow) site subject to 40 CFR part 63 

subpart YY (MON NESHAP) or subpart 

FFFF (GMACT and Ethylene MACT)? 

A: EPA determines that Dow’s process 

is subject to the MON NESHAP, as it did 

not meet the criteria of an ethylene 

production process as defined by the 

Ethylene MACT due to the natural gas 

liquid feed stream and process 

conditions including temperature. 

Abstract for [Z130001]: C:\Documents 

and Settings\mmalave\Local 

Settings\Temp\wzc696\Z130001.pdf. 

Q: Is the integrated biosolids 

management system (IBMS), which uses 

dried biosolids as a feedstock in the 

gasifier to produce syngas for heat 

energy to be transferred to the indirect 

sludge dryer, located at the MaxWest 

South Sanford Water Resources Center 

(MaxWest) in Sanford, Florida, subject 

to 40 CFR part 61 subpart E? 

A: EPA determines that Subpart E is 

applicable to sludge gasifier and 

integrated thermal oxidizer portions and 

not to the sludge dryer portion of 

MaxWest’s IBMS system. 40 CFR part 61 

subpart E does not apply to MaxWest’s 

IBMS sludge dryer portion because it 

does not meet the definition of ‘‘sludge’’ 

dryer in 40 CFR part 61 subpart E since 

it being indirectly heated by thermal 

transfer fluid with no contact with 

combustion gases. 40 CFR part 61 

subpart E applies to MaxWest’s 

combination of the gasifier and thermal 

oxidizer as together they comprise a 

sewage sludge incinerator of a two-steps 

process, one that produces the gases 

through the heating of sewage sludge, 

and a follow up unit in which the gases 

are combusted and emissions vented to 

the atmosphere. 

Dated: October 24, 2013. 

Lisa Lund, 

Director, Office of Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2013–27287 Filed 11–13–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0490; FRL–9902–61] 

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel; 

Notice of Rescheduled Public Meeting 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Agency is issuing this 

notice to reschedule the 3-day meeting 

of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, 

and Rodenticide Act Scientific Advisory 

Panel (FIFRA SAP) to consider and 

review, Scientific Uncertainties 

Associated with Corn Rootworm 

Resistance Monitoring for Bt Corn Plant 

Incorporated Protectants (PIPs). The 

meeting was announced in the Federal 

Register on August 9, 2013. The Agency 

issued a notice of cancellation in the 

Federal Register on October 28, 2013. 


TKELleY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
68440 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 220 / Thursday, November 14, 2013 / Notices 

The new meeting dates are December 4– 

6, 2013. 

DATES: The meeting will be held on 

December 4–6, 2013, from 9:00 a.m. to 

approximately 5:00 p.m. 

Comments. The Agency encourages 

that written comments and requests for 

oral comments are submitted by 

November 26, 2013. However, written 

comments and requests to make oral 

comments may be submitted until the 

date of the meeting, but anyone 

submitting written comments after 

November 26, 2013 should contact the 

Designated Federal Official (DFO) listed 

under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. For additional instructions, 

see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Conference Center, Lobby Level, One 

Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. 

Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA 22202. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred 

Jenkins, DFO, Office of Science 

Coordination and Policy (7201M), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; telephone number: 

(202) 564–3327; fax number: (202) 564– 

8382; email address: Jenkins.fred@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A 

cancellation notice was published in the 

Federal Register on October 28, 2013 

(78 FR 64211) (FRL–9902–06). All other 

information provided in the Federal 

Register on August 9, 2013 (78 FR 

48672) (FRL–9394–3) remains 

unchanged. 

List of Subjects 

Environmental protection, Pesticides 

and pests. 

Dated: November 6, 2013. 

Steven M. Knott, 

Deputy Director, Office of Science 

Coordination and Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2013–27263 Filed 11–13–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK 

[Public Notice: 2013–3004] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Comment Request 

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the 

United States. 

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and 

comments request. 

Form Title: EIB 92–29 Export-Import 

Bank Report of Premiums Payable for 

Exporters Only. 

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of 

the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as part 

of its continuing effort to reduce 

paperwork and respondent burden, 

invites the general public and other 

Federal Agencies to comment on the 

proposed information collection, as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995. 

This collection of information is 

necessary, pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 

635(a) (1), to determine eligibility of 

export sales for insurance coverage. 

The information collection tool can be 

reviewed at: http://www.exim.gov/pub/

pending/eib92-29.pdf. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before December 16, 2013 to be 

assured of consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be 

submitted electronically on 

WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV (EIB–2013– 

0044) or by mail to Office of Information 

and Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th Street 

NW., Washington, DC 20038 Attn: OMB 

3048–EIB92–29. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title and Form Number: EIB 92–29 

Export-Import Bank Report of Premiums 

Payable for Exporters Only. 

OMB Number: 3048–0017. 

Type of Review: Regular. 

Need and Use: The ‘‘Report of 

Premiums Payable for Exporters Only’’ 

form is used by exporters to report and 

pay premiums on insured shipments to 

various foreign buyers under the terms 

of the policy and to certify that 

premiums have been correctly 

computed and remitted. Individual 

transactions that an exporter may have 

with the same foreign borrower can be 

sub-totaled and entered as a single line 

item for the specific month provided the 

length of payment term is identical. The 

use of sub-totals reduces the 

administrative burden on the exporter. 

The ‘Report of Premiums Payable for 

Exporters Only’ is used by the Bank to 

determine the eligibility of the 

shipment(s) and to calculate the 

premium due to Ex-Im Bank for its 

support of the shipment(s) under its 

insurance program. 

Affected Public 

This form affects entities involved in 

the export of U.S. goods and services. 

Annual Number of Respondents: 

2,600. 

Estimated Time per Respondent: 15 

minutes. 

Annual Burden Hours: 7,800. 

Frequency of Reporting of Use: 

Monthly. 

Government Expenses 

Reviewing Time per Year: 7,800 

hours. 

Average Wages per Hour: $42.50. 

Average Cost per Year: $331,500 

(time*wages). 

Benefits and Overhead: 20%. 

Total Government Cost: $397,800. 

Kalesha Malloy, 

Agency Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2013–27191 Filed 11–13–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6690–01–P 

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK 

[Public Notice 2013–3003] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Comment Request 

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the 

United States. 

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and 

comments request. 

Form Title: EIB 92–30 Report of 

Premiums Payable for Financial 

Institutions Only. 

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of 

the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as part 

of its continuing effort to reduce 

paperwork and respondent burden, 

invites the general public and other 

Federal Agencies to comment on the 

proposed information collection, as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995. 

This collection of information is 

necessary, pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 

635(a)(1), to determine eligibility of the 

export sales for insurance coverage. The 

Report of Premiums Payable for 

Financial Institutions Only is used to 

determine the eligibility of the 

shipment(s) and to calculate the 

premium due to Ex-Im Bank for its 

support of the shipment(s) under its 

insurance program. Export-Import Bank 

customers will be able to submit this 

form on paper or electronically. 

The Export-Import Bank has made a 

change to the report to have the insured 

financial institution provide the 

industry code (NAICS) associated with 

each specific export. The insured 

financial institution already provides a 

short description of the goods and/or 

services being exported. This additional 

piece of information will allow Ex-Im 

Bank to better track what exports it is 

covering with its insurance policy. 

The information collection tool can be 

reviewed at: http://www.exim.gov/pub/

pending/eib92-30-new.pdf 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before December 16, 2013 to be 

assured of consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be 

submitted electronically on 

WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV (EIB–2013– 

0043) or by mail to Office of Information 


TKELleY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES