alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 93 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.93
                                         Agreed to April 4, 2001        

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and one

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Wednesday, April 
4, 2001, or Thursday, April 5, 2001, on a motion offered pursuant to 
this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 
stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, April 24, 2001, or until noon 
on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and 
that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Friday, April 6, 2001, Saturday, April 7, 2001, Sunday, April 8, 2001, 
or Monday, April 9, 2001, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, April 23, 2001, or until 
such time on that day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his 
designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the 
second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 
2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-93,252-01

EX P ARTE DUSTIN ALLE N HENSLE Y, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1473696-A IN THE 208 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of possession of child pornog raphy and, afte r a period of defe rre d adjudication probation, sentenc ed to eig ht y ear s’ imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for

a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that plea was involuntary beca use he was incompetent to stand trial and initial plea counsel did not investiga te his competenc y or sanity and did not bring his psy cholog ical issues to the attention of the court. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that , if true, might entitle him to relief

. Brady v. United States , 397 U.S. 742 (1970). Acc ording ly , the rec ord should be develope d. The trial court is the appropr iate forum for findings of fac t. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, §2

3(d). The trial court shall order orig inal plea counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. I n developing the rec ord, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shal l d et ermine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the tri al co urt shall appoint counsel to repr esent him at the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counsel is appointed or reta ined, the trial court shall immediately

notify this Court of counsel’s name

. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s plea wa s involuntary

. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions t hat i t deems appropr iate in re sponse to Applicant’s c laims. The trial court shall make findings o f fa ct and conclusions of law withi n ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objec tions, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: January

12, 2022 Do not publish
Fw: RIA Chapters 6, 7 and Exec Summary for OMB 12/15/2011 06:47 PM

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cortney -

Here are the initial files for the revised RIA ... others to follow shortly.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division
Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

********************************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

********************************************************* ----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 12/15/2011 06:45 PM

----- From: Amanda CurryBrown/RTP/USEPA/US To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Larry Sorrels/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Mikhail Adamantiades/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Susan Anenberg/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Christine Davis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Neal Fann/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim DeMocker/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 12/15/2011 06:38 PM Subject: RIA Chapters 6, 7 and Exec Summary for OMB

Hi Bob,

The attached chapters are ready to go to OMB. The only thing we aremissing is Chapter 5, where revisions are still being made.

Amanda

Amanda Curry Brown OAQPS/HEID/AEG

919.541.3808 CurryBrown.Amanda@epa.gov

Chapter 6_EmploymentEconomicImpactAnalysis_1215.docx

Chapter 7_StatutoryandExecutiveOrderAnalyses_1215.doc

0_Executive SummaryMATS_1215.doc
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 21, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler

FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on January 7, 2011 between Ford, GM, Chrysler, 

NHTSA and EPA staff. The following people attended:

Ford: Cynthia Wiliams, Ken McAlinden

General Motors: Barbara Kiss, Steven Fornay, Dan Freights

Chrysler: Gary Oshnock, Mike Hartrick, Jeff Foor

NHTSA: Jim Tamm, Ryan Harrington

EPA: Byron Bunker, Tony Fernandez, Angela Cullen, Cle Jackson, Don Kopinski

The discussion focused on analytically derived CO2, off-cycle credits for vocational vehicles, air 

conditioning credits, vocational tires, and Part 1066 applying to vehicles with a GVWR less than 

14,000 pounds.
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 19 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 9, 2019 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater 

Washington Soap Box Derby. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX 

4 DERBY RACES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Greater Washington Soap 

6 Box Derby Association (in this resolution referred to as 

7 the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a public 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

HCON 19 RDS 

1 event, soap box derby races (in this resolution referred to 

2 as the ‘‘event’’), on the Capitol Grounds. 

3 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on 

4 June 15, 2019, or on such other date as the Speaker of 

5 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules 

6 and Administration of the Senate jointly designate. 

7 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed 

9 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

10 Board, the event shall be— 

11 (1) free of admission charge and open to the 

12 public; and 

13 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of 

14 Congress. 

15 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall 

16 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities 

17 incident to all activities associated with the event. 

18 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

19 Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Cap20 itol, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol 

21 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and 

22 other related structures and equipment as may be required 

23 for the event. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

HCON 19 RDS 

1 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS. 

2 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

3 Board are authorized to make such additional arrange4 ments as may be required to carry out the event. 

5 SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

6 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce7 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

8 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise9 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

10 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

11 Grounds, with respect to the event. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 8, 2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
----

| CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO                    |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| 18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      |
| AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       |
| SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002 |

|   | (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |

|   | /s/      David G. Baker                    |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | David      G. Baker                        |
|   | President      and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (Chief      Executive Officer)             |
|   |                                       |

|              | /s/      Nandini S. Mallya        |   |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|              | Nandini      S. Mallya            |
|              | Vice      President and Treasurer |
|              | (Chief      Financial Officer)    |
|              |                              |
| May 14,      2009 |                              |
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00464-CV

Mark DAVIS,

Appellant

v.

MIDDLE BOSQUE PARTNERS, LP and Highland Coryell Ranch, LLC,

Appellees

From the 13th Judicial District Court, Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court No. D12-21464-CV

Honorable James E. Lagomarsino, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

REVERSED, and the cause is REMANDED for further proceedings. It is ORDERED that 

appellant, Mark Davis, recover his costs of this appeal from appellees, Middle Bosque Partners, 

LP and Highland Coryell Ranch, LLC.

SIGNED April 9, 2014.

_____________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
Test Kit Evaluation Submission Form 

The applicant must fill out the submission form and provide it along with the submission 

packet. The information provided in the submission form will be used in creating the 

certificate if the test kit meets all FGIS requirements; therefore, it is imperative that the 

form be filled out correctly. A fillable version of this form is available on the AMS Website.

Contact Information 

Applicant (i.e., test kit manufacturer)

Street Address

City, State, Zip Code

Contact Person

Phone Number

Email Address

Billing Address 

(if different than manufacturer’s address)

City, State, Zip Code

Test Kit Information 

Test Kit Name

Product Identification Number

Test Method Format

Reader Name

Reader Model or Identification Number

Detection Method

Upper Conformance Limit

Additional Commodities 

(list in alphabetical order)
Test Kit Evaluation Submission Form (continued) 

Design Criteria and Performance Specification Check List

The test kit meets the performance requirements and submission packet 

components are included. 

Initials 

Time for completion of analysis ≤ 30 minutes

FGIS reference method or equivalent used for reference analyses (validation report or 

literature reference provided if FGIS reference method not used)

Accuracy study for naturally contaminated corn from 0.50 – 30 ppm fumonisins

Additional accuracy data for optional extension of upper limit of conformance 

above 30 ppm fumonisins in corn 

Data supporting accuracy of multiple ranges of quantitation

Additional commodities – accuracy data; sample preparation and analytical procedure 

is described for each additional commodity (including grinding procedure); type of 

reference material is given (naturally-contaminated or standard-solution fortified)

Use of the test kit does not expose the employees to toxic or hazardous substances 

higher than OSHA Standards per 29 CFR when used without a fume hood or respirator. 

Use of the test kit does not generate radioactive waste, P-listed hazardous waste, or 

hazardous waste listed for its toxicity characteristic as defined in 40 CFR

Safety Data Sheets (SDS)

Reader electromagnetic field study certification statement (renewals exempt if same reader)

Temperature sensitivity study

Shelf life study

Certificates of analysis for reference materials

Written test kit instructions (provided as Microsoft Word document)

Method flow chart is included (optional)

Protocol & Notification Agreement Statement signed by applicant

Comments
## COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 137th District Court of Lubbock County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on August 3,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Jimmy Zavala v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 07-15-00285-CR Trial Court Number: 2012-433,926

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated August 3, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that this appeal be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis

, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on October 20, 2015

.



# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7237

JOSE LUIS MACIAS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

BUTCH JACKSON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:09-hc-02102-BO)

Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: December 2, 2010

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose Luis Macias, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Hollis, 

Assistant Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jose Luis Macias seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Macias has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
Fruit & Specialty Crops 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.

Vegetable Inspection Room 1536-S, STOP 0240

Program Division Washington, DC 20250-0240

March 8, 2013

AMENDMENT NO. 4

COMMODITY SPECIFICATION

CANNED VEGETABLES DATED FEBRUARY 2012

The purpose of this amendment is to add Kosher 6/#10 canned carrots to the Commodity 

Specification Canned Vegetables Dated February 2012, Section V. Exhibits, Exhibit 5, Universal 

Product Codes.

Universal Product Code

WBSCM

6/10 cans Material Primary Container Secondary Container

Carrots, Kosher 110360 7 15001 103604 1 07 15001 103601

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.
#### Joseph Wayne CAPWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

No. 3283.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

Sept. 2, 1977.

*11Chris J.- Rigos, Asst. Public Defender, and Brian Shortell, Public Defender, Anchorage, for appellant.

Glen C. Anderson, Asst. Dist. Atty.,' and Joseph D. Balfe, Dist. Atty., Anchorage, Avrum M. Gross, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellee.

Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and RABI-NOWITZ, CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Capwell has appealed from a sentence of five years imprisonment upon his conviction after a plea of guilty to an indictment charging him with the offense of assault with intent to commit rape. Little would be accomplished by detailing the nature of the offense or Mr. Capwell’s prior relationship with the twelve-year-old victim. In sentencing Mr. Capwell, the court recommended psychiatric treatment.

While the judge did not discuss all of the sentencing goals set forth in *State v. Chaney,*477 P.2d 441, 444 (Alaska 1970), he did minimally state reasons for imposing the sentence, including the use of a knife, the relationship with the victim, and the need for maintaining societal norms. The court further indicated an interest in the rehabilitation of the defendant by recommending psychiatric treatment.

To facilitate our task on review, we urge trial courts to articulate their rationale for imposing particular sentences and their assessment of the *Chaney*criteria more fully than was done in this case. However, in view of the nature of the offense involved and the defendant’s admissions as to past abuses of the victim, we cannot say that the court was clearly mistaken in imposing a five-year sentence.

Counsel has also raised an issue similar to that discussed in *Nattrass v. State,*554 P.2d 399 (Alaska 1976), contending that the defendant was not afforded an adequate right of allocution as provided by Criminal Rule 32(a).1 The facts in this case are quite similar to those in *Nattrass*in which we found a minimal compliance with the rule but strongly recommended that trial judges:

> unequivocally bring home to the defendant that he has the right to make a statement in his own behalf and to present any information in mitigation of his punishment.2

*12Here, after hearing argument of counsel, the judge stated:

> Do you want to stand, please Mr. Cap-well. Do you have anything you want to say before I impose sentence?

We note that the sentencing hearing took place on September 2, 1976, four days prior to issuance of the *Nattrass*opinion. Under these circumstances, we conclude that there was a minimal compliance with the requirements of the rule, although in the future, we shall expect trial courts to follow more explicitly our recommendations in *Nattrass.*

AFFIRMED.

1

. Criminal Rule 32(a) provides in part:

> (a) *Sentence. . . .*Before imposing sentence the court shall afford the defendant an opportunity to make a statement in his own behalf and to present any information in mitigation of punishment. .

2

. 554 P.2d at 402.
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







The
undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Cross Canyon Energy Corp. (the
“Company”), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:  June
      3, 2009
            
            /s/  Carl A. ChaseCarl
      A. ChaseChief
      Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.