alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p. 1


# OAR Box 1190 Prepped byCandice Davis



### Document

Number: 

# 66) ll-B-4 Docket Number: 

# A-90-2 8

Printed 5/5/20089:13:51 AM

Sheet 66 of 106

# fY°\^q > P. 2

LA WOFFICE S CONLON , FRANTZ , PHELAN , KNAP P6 C P IRE S JEFFER YW . KNAPP * DAVI D J . FRANTZ * BRIA N P . PHELA N * MICHAE L J . CONLO N • ALEXANDE R J . PIPES , JR . MAR YJEA N FASSETT* *
'ALS O ADMITTE D I N VA . "ALS O ADMITTE D I N MD . SUIT E 70 0 181 8 N STREET , N
. W
. WASHINGTON , D . C . 2003 6 (202 ) 331-705 0 FAX : (202 ) 331-930 6 RICHAR D A . MEHLE R (1920-1987 ) O FCOUNSE L F. JOSEP H BRINIG* * LAWRENC E BERNSTEI N ROBER TV . VARNU M « VIRGINI AOFFIC E 4 2 0 SOUT H WASHINGTO N STREE T ALEXANDRIA , VA . 2231 4

' in r -• ; ••• a. <i__r '«,->•"»'; , 

### Septembe r 28 , 199 5


### Mr . Charle s N . Free d\\\\ Un ^- C \3^

_\U\ Directo r Manufacturer s Operation s Divisio n(6405 ) U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y 40 1 MStreet , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2046 0

Re : Californi a OB D 1 1 Waive r Regues t Dea r Mr . Freed : Pleas e b e advise d tha t myclient , th e Automotiv e Part s Rebuilder s Association , wishe s t o testif ya t th e publi c hearing o n Octobe r 17 , 199 5 i nAn nArbor , Michiga no nCalifornia' s reques t fo r a waive r fo r it s OB D I I regulations . Ver ytrul yyours ,

chael : J . Conlo n MJC/K s
Order entered April 9, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01076-CV

GARY A. ROSE, Appellant

V.

MARION ROSE MCBRIDE, Appellee

On Appeal from the Collin County Probate

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PB1-0521-2010

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case is overdue. By postcards dated September 18, 2014 and 

January 6, 2015, we notified the court reporter for the Collin County Probate Court that the 

reporter’s record was overdue. We directed the court reporter to file the record within thirty 

days. To date, we have not received any response. On March 30, 2015, Court Reporter Kelly 

Bryant filed a letter informing the Court that the record is past due but payment had not been 

received and the trial court never declared appellant indigent. Our records show the affidavit 

was timely filed and nothing in the record shows that a contest was either filed or sustained. 

Consequently, appellant is entitled to proceed in this Court without advance payment of costs. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(a)(2).
Accordingly, we ORDER Kelly Bryant to file the reporter’s record within FIFTEEN 

DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send copies of this order, by electronic 

transmission, to all parties, to Court Reporter Kelly Bryant, and to the Honorable Weldon 

Copeland, Presiding Judge of the Collin County Probate Court.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
p.1 

OAR Box 1190 

Prepped by Candice Davis 

Document Number: 

66) ll-B-4 

Docket Number: 

A-90-28 

Printed 5/5/2008 9:13:51 AM Sheet 66 of 106 
fY°\^q> 

P.2 

LAW OFFICE S 

CONLON, FRANTZ, PHELAN , KNAP P 6C P I RE S 

JEFFERY W. KNAPP* 

DAVID J . FRANTZ* 

BRIAN P. PHELAN * 

MICHAEL J . CONLON • 

ALEXANDER J . PIPES, JR. 

MARY JEAN FASSETT** 

'ALSO ADMITTED IN VA. 

"ALSO ADMITTED IN MD. 

SUITE 70 0 

1818 N STREET, N. W. 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 2003 6 

(202 ) 331-705 0 

FAX: (202) 331-930 6 

RICHARD A. MEHLER 

(1920-1987 ) 

OF COUNSEL 

F. JOSEP H BRINIG* * 

LAWRENCE BERNSTEIN 

ROBERT V. VARNUM « 

VIRGINIA OFFICE 

4 2 0 SOUTH WASHINGTON STREET 

ALEXANDRIA, VA. 22314 

' inr -• ; ••• a. <i__r '«,->•"»'; , 

September 28, 1995 

Mr. Charles N. Freed \\\\U n ^ - C \3^_ \U\ 

Director 

Manufacturers Operations 

Division (6405) 

U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency 

401 M Street, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20460 

Re: California OBD 11 Waiver Reguest 

Dear Mr. Freed: 

Please be advised that my client, the Automotive Parts 

Rebuilders Association, wishes to testify at the public hearing on 

October 17, 1995 in Ann Arbor, Michigan on California's request for 

a waiver for its OBD II regulations. 

Very truly yours, 

chael: J. Conlon 

MJC/Ks
**
**Exhibit 8.1**

**Subsidiaries of MoneyHero Limited**

Thefollowing list sets forth the subsidiaries of MoneyHero Limited. 

 

**Legal Name**
  
**Jurisdiction of Incorporation**
CompareAsia Group Capital Limited  Cayman IslandsGemini Merger Sub 1 Limited  Cayman IslandCompareAsia Group Limited  Hong KongCAG Regional Limited  Hong KongCAG Regional Singapore Pte. Ltd  SingaporeCompargo Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.  MalaysiaEkos Limited  Hong KongEkos Inc.  PhilippinesEkos Pte. Ltd.  SingaporeMoneyGuru Co. Ltd.  ThailandMoneyGuru Insurance Broker Co., Ltd.  ThailandMoneyGuru Philippines Corporation  PhilippinesMoneyGuru Services Co., Ltd.  ThailandMoneyHero Insurance Brokerage, Inc.  PhilippinesMoneyHero Insurance Brokers Limited  Hong KongMoneyHero Global Limited  Hong KongPT MoneyGuru Indonesia  IndonesiaSingsaver Insurance Brokers Pte. Ltd.  SingaporeSingsaver Pte. Ltd.  SingaporeSeedly Pte. Ltd  Singapore理財一零一有限公司 (Money101 Limited*)  Taiwan
 
***
*English translation for identification purpose only*
**
NO. 07-03-0374-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

APRIL 30, 2004

______________________________

GERARDO OJEDA, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 222ND DISTRICT COURT OF DEAF SMITH COUNTY;

NO. CR-02H-103; HONORABLE H. BRYAN POFF, JR., JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Gerardo Ojeda filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal on April 8, 2004, averring

that he no longer wishes to prosecute his appeal. The Motion to Dismiss is signed by both

appellant and his attorney. 

Without passing on the merits of the case, appellant’s motion for voluntary dismissal

is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. Having dismissed
-2-

the appeal at appellant’s personal request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and

our mandate will issue forthwith. 

Phil Johnson

 Chief Justice

Do not publish.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 72 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.72
                                     Agreed to November 14, 2019        

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 2423, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall make the following corrections:
        (1) In section 2(a)(3), strike ``Carrie Chapman Cat'' and 
    insert ``Carrie Chapman Catt''.
        (2) In section 4(a)(2)(C), strike the period after ``Unum'' and 
    insert a period after the closed quotation mark at the end.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
# Certificate of Achievement

This is to certify that



# Tomas Cavallaro

has successfully completed the

FAA Safety Team Aviation Learning Center Online Course



# Part 107 Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS)

Course Number ALC-451

Presented by Online Courses 

# June 30, 2016

Federal Aviation

Administration

Certificate Number 0825305-20160630-00451

# Certificate of Achievement

This is to certify that



### Tomas Cavallaro

has successfully completed the

FAA Safety Team Aviation Learning Center Online Course

Part 107 Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS)

Course Number ALC-451

Presented by Online Courses

June 30, 2016

Certificate Number 0825305-20160630-00451



### Cut out the small certificate above and keep with your airman certificate. You should keep the remainder of this sheet in a safe place in case you lose your certificate above.



# Your Name Tomas Cavallaro

Your faasafety.gov Registered Username irontkc@gmail.com

Course Completed Part 107 Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS)

Course Completion Date June 30, 2016

Course Completion Certificate Number 0825305-20160630-00451
### Court ofAppeals, State ofMichigan ORDER Valerie Urech v Pioneer State Mutual Insurance Company Docket No. 339784 LC No. 16-013750NF Douglas B. Shapiro PresidingJudge Jane M. Beckering Michael J. Kelly

Judges The Court orders that the dissenting opinion is hereby AMENDED. The dissenting opinion contained the following clerical error: Page eight, second paragraph from the bottom, the second sentence should read: That is, reasonable minds could differ on whether Urech understood the nature ofthe documents her sonhad her sign and whether at the end ofthe month she could have recalled who assisted her when. In all otherrespects, the July 2, 2019 dissenting opinion remains unchanged.

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. ZimmerJr., ChiefClerk, on


## JUL O 92019 Date 

# ~«)~- 

# 9- Chielerk
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 23, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 23, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0143. RENE RODRIGUEZ v. THE STATE .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

13CR1285
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eugene WHITFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 78-848.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

Dec. 28, 1979.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 17, 1980.

As Modified On Denial of Rehearing Jan. 31, 1980.

Certiorari Denied May 19, 1980.

*586J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., David W. Robbins, Deputy Atty. Gen., Edward G. Donovan, Sol. Gen., John Daniel Dailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

Harold A. Haddon, Special Deputy State Public Defender, Denver, for defendant-appellant.

KELLY, Judge.

Eugene Whitfield appeals his conviction of felony theft. He contends that the trial court erred in refusing to grant his motion for a judgment of acquittal and in finding that he was not eligible for an indeterminate sentence. We affirm the conviction, vacate the sentence, and remand.

Whitfield was charged with removing cantilever signal poles from the property of the Union Pacific Railroad without authorization. Whitfield argues that the People failed to prove that he took the poles with the knowledge that he did not have authorization to do so. We disagree.

The conflicting evidence, and the available inferences, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, is sufficient to support a conclusion by a reasonable person beyond a reasonable doubt, that Whitfield knew he had no authorization to remove the poles. *See People v. Bennett,*183 Colo. 125, 515 P.2d 466 (1973).

The court sentenced Whitfield to a minimum term of not less than two years’ imprisonment because he had been previously convicted of a felony. *See*§ 16-11— 101(l)(d), C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8). Whitfield argues that the evidence was insufficient to support a determination that he was not eligible for an indeterminate sentence. We agree.

While the record reveals that Whitfield had been previously charged with felony menacing, it does not reveal whether the offense upon which the charge was based occurred “within five years prior to the date of the offense for which he is being sentenced.” Section 16-ll-101(l)(d), C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8). Consequently, the sentence was improper. The People’s contention that this issue must be raised in the trial court is without merit since the alleged defect in the sentence is jurisdictional and may be raised for this first time on appeal. *People v. Hinchman,*196 Colo. 526, 589 P.2d 917 (1978), *cert. denied sub nom., Hinchman v. Colorado,*442 U.S. 941, 99 S.Ct. 2883, 61 L.Ed.2d 311 (1979).

In view of our conclusions, we need not address Whitfield’s other assignment of error.

The judgment is affirmed, the sentence is vacated, and the cause is remanded for modification of Whitfield’s sentence to an indeterminate term. Section 16-11— 101(l)(d), C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8).

COYTE and SILVERSTEIN, JJ., concur.
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, In the Interest of T. F. B., a Child, Respondent-Appellant, and Concerning B. E.

No. 80SA74.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

May 12, 1980.

J. E. Losavio, Jr., Dist. Atty., Stephen A. Jones, Deputy Dist. Atty., Pueblo, for plaintiff-appellee.

J. Gregory Walta, Colorado State Public Defender, Denver, Stephanie H. Yukawa, Deputy State Public Defender, Pueblo, for respondent-appellant.

ERICKSON, Justice.

This appeal involves factual and legal issues that are identical to those raised in *P. V. v. District Court,*Colo., 609 P.2d 110 (1980). In that case we held that a trial court conducting a juvenile proceeding is bound by the same statutory and constitutional speedy trial requirements that are applicable in adult proceedings. *See,*section 18-1-405(1), C.R.S. 1973 (now in 1978 Repl. Vol. 8); Crim.P. 48(b)(1); Colo.Const. Art. II, Sec. 3; U.S. Const. Art. VI.

Accordingly, we remand to the trial court to determine whether the charges against the appellant should be dismissed in accordance with our decision in *P. V. v. District Court.*

ROVIRA and LOHR, JJ., dissent.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,239-02

EX PARTE DERRICK LAMONT SMITH, JR., Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 77784-A IN THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM BELL COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant pleaded guilty to aggravated assault bodily injury with a deadly weapon and was

sentenced to fourteen years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction. Applicant filed this

application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded

it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends, among other things, that plea was involuntarybecause trial counsel never

informed him that the jury could place him on probation even if it found him guilty as charged in the

indictment. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Hill v. Lockhart, 474

U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent, 393 S.W.3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Accordingly, the record

should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX.CODE CRIM.
2

PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. 

In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the

trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is

indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him

at the hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial

court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whethertrial counsel’s

performance was deficient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s alleged

deficient performance. The trial court should make detailed findings regarding whethertrial counsel

told Applicant, prior to accepting the plea offer, that a jury could place Applicant on probation even

if it found him guilty as charged in the indictment. The trial court may make any other findings and

conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: April 14, 2021

Do not publish
Exhibit 32.1
  
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with this Amendment No. 2 of Quarterly Report of Tengion, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John L. Miclot, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: February 8, 2013
 
 /s/John L. Miclot

John L. Miclot
 President and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
FILED IN6th COURT OF APPEALS    TEXARKANA, TEXAS4/7/2015 4:02:07 PM      DEBBIE AUTREY              Clerk
| (1)   | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |   |
|   | /s/ BRANDON T. O’BRIEN                                  |   |
|   | Brandon T. O’Brien                                                                                                                                                                                                           |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                            |   |
|   | August 15, 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 95 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 95

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine 
                               justices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 24, 2020

 Mr. Peterson (for himself and Mr. Riggleman) submitted the following 
 joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine 
                               justices.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``The Supreme Court of the United States shall be composed of nine 
justices.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment
Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of
Directors of the Company, certifies that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ David LichtensteinDavid
      LichtensteinChairman,
      President, and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)May
      15, 2009