alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

DENNIS CUNNINGHAM,

 Petitioner

 v.

FORBES REGIONAL HOSPITAL AND

WEST PENN ALLEGHENY HEALTH

SYSTEM,

 Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 591 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 31, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 31, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0296. ASPEN VILLAGE AT LOST MOUNTAIN ASSISTED LIVING, LLC v.

TERRY CARDER d/b/a CARDER'S GRADING.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

1314921
TDCJ Offender Details WfilFfe Page 1of2

#|TE*£S| BlFARTJMIfff Qti GrMnM j;UjSJ:Ti&g' TDCJ Home New Offender Search

Offender Information Details

Return to Search list

SID Number:

TDCJ Number:

Name:

Race:

Gender:

DOB:

Maximum Sentence Date:

Current Facility:

Projected Release Date:

Parole Eligibility Date:

Offender Visitation Eligible:

07279870

01521900

GARCIA.ANDY MILTON

H

M

1990-02-12

2028-03-04

BETO

2028-03-04

2018-03-04

YES

Information provided is updated once daily during weekdays and multiple times per day

on visitation days. Because this information is subject to change, family members and

friends are encouraged to call the unit prior to traveling for a visit.

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE:

Scheduled Release Date:

Scheduled Release Type:

Scheduled Release Location:

Offender is not scheduled for release at this time.

Will be determined when release date is scheduled.

Will be determined when release date is scheduled.

Parole Review Information

Offense History:

Offense

Date

2007-12-05

Offense

AGG ROBBERY

D/W

Sentence

Date

2008-08-08

County Case No.

DALLAS F-07-59914-

R

Sentence (YY-MMDD)

20-00-00

http://offender.tdcj.state.tx.us/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=07279870 4/13/2015
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

I, Dianne M. Scheu, Senior Vice President,Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Cellu Tissue Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.               TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended November 24,2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in suchQuarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | January 6, 2006                                         |   | /s/ Dianne M. Scheu |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------|--------|
|   | Dianne M. Scheu                                              |
|   | Senior Vice President,  Finance and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 31.1**

Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification

I, Rajesh Kalathur, certify that:

​

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of John Deere Owner Trust 2023-C (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

​

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

​

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing, and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

​

4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

​

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

​

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association (as indenture trustee).

​

​

| 4                      | ​ | ​                                     |
|------------------------|---------|---------------------------------------------|
| Date: January 26, 2024 | By:     | */s/ Rajesh Kalathur*                       |
| ​                | ​ | Rajesh Kalathur                             |
| ​                | ​ | President of John Deere Capital Corporation |
| ​                | ​ | (as Servicer)                               |

​

----
ex_389091.htm


 


 


EQUITY PLAN AMENDMENT


 


AMENDMENT OF THE

NEXTDECADE CORPORATION

2017 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN


 


This Amendment (“Amendment”) of the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time (the “Plan”) of NextDecade Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), is adopted by the Company on May 11, 2022, subject to approval by the Company’s stockholders (the “Stockholders”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Plan;


 


WHEREAS, under Section 16.2 of the Plan, the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) may amend the Plan at any time, contingent on approval of the Stockholders, to the extent the Board deems necessary.


 


WHEREAS, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, the Board has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company to increase the authorized number of shares available for issuance under the Plan.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, subject to approval of the Stockholders:


 


	 	
			1.

				
			Section 4.1 of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

			



 


“4.1     Number of Shares Reserved. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.5 hereof, the total number of Shares of Common Stock that are reserved for issuance under the Plan (the “Share Reserve”) shall equal (a) 15,262,461 shares of Common Stock, plus (b) effective May 11, 2022 (subject to stockholder approval), 3,000,000. All such sum of shares may be issued as Incentive Stock Options. Each share of Common Stock subject to an Award shall reduce the Share Reserve by one share; provided, however, that Awards that are required to be paid in cash pursuant to their terms shall not reduce the Share Reserve. Any shares of Common Stock delivered under the Plan shall consist of authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares.” 


 


	 	
			2.

				
			The Plan, as amended hereby, and all other documents, instruments, and agreements executed or delivered in connection therewith, shall remain in full force and effect, and are hereby ratified and confirmed.

			



 


[Signature page follows.]


 



 




 




 


 


 


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereby certify that the foregoing Amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of NextDecade Corporation on May 11, 2022.


 


NEXTDECADE CORPORATION


 


	 	
			By:        

				
			/s/ Vera de Gyarfas

			
	 	
			Name:

				
			Vera de Gyarfas

			
	 	
			Title:

				
			General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

			



 


*          *          *          *          *


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereby certify that the foregoing Amendment was approved by the stockholders of NextDecade Corporation on June 22, 2022.


 


NEXTDECADE CORPORATION


 


	 	
			By:        

				
			/s/ Vera de Gyarfas

			
	 	
			Name:

				
			Vera de Gyarfas

			
	 	
			Title:

				
			General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Order entered April 8, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01151-CV

AXCESS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellant

V.

BAKER BOTTS, L.L.P., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-01301-E

ORDER

The parties have informed the Court that certain video deposition testimony offered at 

trial was omitted from the reporter’s record and have filed the attached joint stipulation 

containing that testimony. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.6(d), we ORDER 

Vikki L. Ogden, Official Court Reporter for County Court at Law No. 5, to file, within ten days 

of the date of this order, a supplemental reporter’s record containing the missing testimony as 

reflected in the stipulation. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(d).

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>   1
                  DESCRIPTION OF 1997 COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS
                          WITH LUBIN, DELANO & COMPANY





     During 1997, Lexington Precision Corporation (the "Company") compensated
Michael A. Lubin, its Chairman of the Board, and Warren Delano, its President,
indirectly through payments to Lubin, Delano & Company, an investment banking
firm of which they are the only partners. These compensation arrangements
provided for payment to Lubin, Delano & Company of a basic fee of $400,000, and
provided for a possible incentive fee based upon attaining an operating profit
target for the Company and possible transaction fees as might be agreed upon by
the Company and Lubin, Delano & Company in connection with acquisitions,
divestitures, financings and other similar transactions.
H. Con. Res. 82 Agreed to December 19, 2019

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1865, the Clerk 

of the House of Representatives shall make the following corrections: 

(1) Amend the long title so as to read: ‘‘Making further 

consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020, and for other purposes.’’. 

(2) Strike the first section 1 immediately following the 

enacting clause and all that follows through section 9. 

(3) In section 101 of title I of division P, strike the matter 

in quotes and insert ‘‘Platte River Recovery Implementation 

Program Extension Act’’. 

(4) In the table of contents for subtitle F of title I of 

division N, strike the item relating to section 601. 

(5) Strike section 601 of subtitle F of title I of division 

N. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-14-00938-CR

Style: Xavier Sherod Dukes v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: April 1, 2015

Type of motion: Third Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant’s Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: January 29, 2015

Number of extensions granted: 2 Current Due Date: April 1, 2015

Date Requested: May 4, 2015

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: May 4, 2015.

 No further extensions of time will be granted.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

On March 2, 2015, the Clerk of this Court granted appellant’s second extension and

warned counsel that no further extensions would be granted absent exceptional 

circumstances. Appellant’s motion states that, since the complete record was filed, 

counsel has been appointed to three felony cases where the prior attorney withdrew 

after the case was set for trial and counsel has been given a short time to prepare. Thus,

appellant’s motion is granted, but counsel is warned that no further extensions will 

be granted. Accordingly, if appellant’s brief is not filed by May 4, 2015, the Court 

may abate this appeal for a hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

  

Date: April 9, 2015
Dismissed and Opinion Filed July 31, 2015 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-15-00491-CV FLORA ANDERSON, Appellant V. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-01422-D



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justi ce Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By postcard dated April 16, 2015, we notified appellan t the $195 filing fee wa s due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated April 16, 2015, we notified appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant to file the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so might result in dismissal of this appeal. By lette r dated June 11, 2015, we informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or written docum entation that appellant had been found to be–2– entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without fu rther notice. To date, ap pellant has not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing statement, provided the require d documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding th e status of the clerk’s record. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5; 37.3(b); 42.3(b),(c).

150491F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
FLORA ANDERSON, Appellant
No. 05-15-00491-CV V.
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-01422-D. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee FEDERAL NATI ONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION recover its costs of this appeal from appellant FLORA ANDERSON.
Judgment entered July 31, 2015.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-3103
LORIE C. PRETZEL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CRSS FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN; JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE C OPANY; CRRS, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-998-5-F) Submitted: May 29, 1997 Decided: June 23, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lorie C. Pretzel, Appellant Pro Se. James M. Powell, HAYNSWORTH, BALDWIN, JOHNSON & GREAVES, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summaryjudgment in favor of the Defendants in this action alleging a deprivation of Appellant’s rights under the Employee Retirement Income Act of 1974. 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (West 1985 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pretzel v. CRSS Flexible , No. CA-94-998-5-F (E.D.N.C. Oct. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan 

ORDER 

ROY JOSEPH AKERS V NATALIYA AKERS 

Docket No. 323806 

LC No. 2003-6756 17-DM 

Pat M. Donofrio 

Presiding Judge 

Michael J. Riordan 

Michael F. Gadola 

Judges 

MfN ISTERlAL ORDER CORRECTlNG OPfNION 

JT JS HEREBY ORDERED that with respect to the opinio n issued on March 17, 2015 in 

this matter, the two instances providing a date of December 17. 20 13 are hereby corrected to show a date 

of December 17. 2003. 

APR O 8 2015 

Date
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, David D’Addario, certify that: 

1. Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wise Metals Group LLC; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 14, 2006
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, filed on the date hereof with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                               
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 5, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    Robert A. Alter                        
|                       |  |  |  | Robert A. Alter                               
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 5, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    Kenneth E. Cruse                       
|                       |  |  |  | Kenneth E. Cruse                              
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 10, 2015

No. 04-14-00736-CV

Annah Cardash BERRY,

Appellant

v.

Starrett BERRY and Laura Berry,

Appellees

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13859

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Accelerated Appeal filed on April 6, 2015 is 

DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.3(a).

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
391 A.2d 706

#### Commonwealth v. Zangari, Appellant.

Submitted March 20, 1978.

Edward F. Browne, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Michael D. Melie, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence vacated and case remanded for resentencing.

PRICE, J., dissented.