alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32








CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the report of Ridgewood Energy L Fund, LLC (the “Fund”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.





Dated:
            May
      14 , 2008
            
            
            
            RIDGEWOOD
      ENERGY L FUND, LLCBy:
            /s/
            
            ROBERT
      E. SWANSONName:
            
            Robert
      E. SwansonTitle:
            
            President
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)Dated:
            May
      14 , 2008By:
            /s/
            
            KATHLEEN
      P. MCSHERRYName:
            
            Kathleen
      P. McSherryTitle:
            
            Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
Ridgewood Energy L Fund, LLC and will be retained by Ridgewood Energy L Fund,
LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 of ReachLocal, Inc. (the
Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ross G. Landsbaum, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Ross G. LandsbaumRoss G. LandsbaumChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)Date: August 13, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Orsus Xelent  Technologies,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report).
I, Wang Xin, Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


                                                      By: /s/ Wang Xin
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Wang Xin
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                         November 16, 2005
April 9, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, DIVISION OF WORKERS' 

COMPENSATION, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00264-CV V.

LINDA GREEN, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on March 2, 2015. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

I ,01 Fannin Streets HOUSTON

Houston,Texas 7-^2^96p

,01 &F& "IS

RE: Case No. •jP|i$rg-%)03 94-CR

Style: Alfred Rodriguez, J:FIRST COURT OFAPPEALS v. The State of -Texas

The State has waived

cause on this date.

U.S.POSTAGE» PITNEY BOWES

*nTM°2 $©©@.34( 0001372104 APR 01 2015

brief in the above referenced

T. C. Case # 1931465

wxxes;

A. Prine, Clerk of the-Court

Alfred Rodriguez Junior

SPN #01504484

14022 Walter Rd.

Houston, TX 77014

.>7"3- .UE-- !«««" .?.2K:'*7ilI:^-i"5rANK.
Exhibit 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT





HARLEY-DAVIDSON CREDIT CORP.





I, David Viney, Vice President and Treasurer of Harley-Davidson Credit Corp. (“HDCC”), certify that:





(i) a review of HDCC’s activities for the period from September 27, 2023 (the closing date of the Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2023-A transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation AB) through December 31, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”) and of HDCC’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2023 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) among Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2023-B, Harley-Davidson Customer Funding Corp., HDCC, and Citibank, N.A., has been made under my supervision; and





(ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, HDCC has fulfilled in all material respects all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 21st day of March, 2024.








/s/ David VineyDavid VineyVice President and Treasurer of Harley-Davidson Credit Corp., Servicer to Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2023-B
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

   The certification set forth below is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or
Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and with Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Dennis Eldjarnson, the Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of
Siam Imports, Inc. hereby certifies that:

   1.  the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2.  the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Siam Imports, Inc.


                                                  SIAM IMPORTS, INC.,
                                        a Nevada corporation (Registrant)


Dated: November 23, 2005                By: /s/ Dennis Eldjarnson, President,
                                        CEO, Treasurer, CFO, Principal
                                        Accounting Officer and Director
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Alston, Chafin and Senior Judge Haley 

FAIRFAX COUNTY 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 2012-14-4 PER CURIAM 

 APRIL 14, 2015 

MATTHEW DOMYANCIC 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (David P. Bobzien, County Attorney; Peter D. Andreoli, Jr., Deputy 

County Attorney; Karen L. Gibbons, Senior Assistant County 

Attorney; Jamie M. Greenzweig, Assistant County Attorney, on 

brief), for appellant. 

 (Jack T. Burgess; Burgess & Perigard, PLLC, on brief), for appellee. 

 Fairfax County (hereinafter “employer”) appeals an October 27, 2014 decision of the 

Workers’ Compensation Commission awarding Matthew Domyancic medical benefits and 

attorneys’ fees.1 We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this 

appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its 

final opinion. See Domyancic v. Fairfax Cnty., JCN 2274883 (Oct. 27, 2014).2

 We dispense 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 

1

 In a separate, related appeal, we affirmed the commission’s August 7, 2014 decision 

finding that Domyancic had not failed to report a return to work and that his 

psychiatric/psychological conditions were a compensable consequence of the original work 

injury. See Fairfax Cnty. v. Domyancic, Record No. 1625-14-4 (Apr. 14, 2015). 

2

 We do not address employer’s argument that the medical records of Drs. Krochmal and 

Brod were inadmissible. Employer cites no ruling from the record excluding these records, and 

does not include their admissibility among its assignments of error on appeal. Rule 5A:20(c) 

requires an appellant’s opening brief to contain “[a] statement of the assignments of error with a 

clear and exact reference to the page(s) of the transcript, written statement, record, or appendix 

where each assignment of error was preserved in the trial court.” See Winston v. 

Commonwealth, 51 Va. App. 74, 82, 654 S.E.2d 340, 345 (2007) (where appellant did not 

include an argument in his questions presented (now assignments of error), the Court would not 

address it on appeal). 

UNPUBLISHED 
 - 2- 

with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

 Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period
ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R. Clay Hulette, the Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.





/s/ R. Clay HuletteR.
      Clay HuletteVice
      President and Chief Financial OfficerOctober
      5, 2010
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

July 15, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

136878 (19) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

JONATHAN MOORE JR, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 136878 

 COA: 283169 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $45.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court. 

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$330.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

 Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order. 

jm 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 15, 2008 

Clerk
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-4 Specification

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 June 27, 2019

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 1 of 2 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Swift Chef’s Exclusive Beef Program

G-4 Specification

1 REQUIREMENTS

Beef carcasses certified under this specification shall meet the following requirements: 

a. Classed as Steer or Heifer carcasses only1;

b. U.S. Prime or Choice and have a minimum marbling score of Modest 01; 

c. Less than 30 months of age with lean color, texture, and firmness, meeting the requirements for

A maturity in the U.S. grade it qualifies for1;

d. Medium or fine marbling texture1, 2

; 

e. Moderately thick or thicker muscling and tend to be at least moderately wide and thick in

relation to their length3;

f. No hump exceeding 2 inches in height 4; 

g. Practically free (not detracting from visual quality) of capillary rupture in the ribeye muscle;

and

h. Free of “dark cutting” characteristics.

2 CERTIFICATION

Carcasses to be examined for compliance with this specification shall be clearly identified and 

presented to an AMS grader for certification. Certification procedures for identification, the removal 

of preliminary identification marks (or other methods of control) from non-qualifying carcasses, and 

control of certified carcasses shall be in accordance with established Quality Assessment Division 

(QAD) procedures. 

3 LABELING

Labeling of products derived from certified carcasses must follow Food Safety and Inspection Service 

regulations and policy guidelines and QAD procedures. 

1 Determined in accordance with the “Official United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef.” 2 Evaluated using the USDA-AMS-LS-SB-02 Marbling Texture card (included in the Official USDA Marbling Photographs.) 3 Muscle thickness is evaluated by averaging the thickness of the various parts, considering not only the proportion of each part of the 

carcass but also the general value of each part. Superior muscle thickness implies a high proportion of meat to bone and a high 

proportion of the weight of the carcass in the more valuable parts.

4 Measured from a line formed by the extension of the top line (including the fat) and measuring the lean muscle (excluding the fat) 

perpendicular to that line in the center of the hump.
Agricultural Quality Assessment Division G-4 Specification

Marketing 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Stop 0258 June 27, 2019

Service Washington, DC 20250 Page 2 of 2 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

4 FEES

The costs of all grading and certification services performed by an AMS grader involving 

examinations, supervision, official documentation, and related services shall be borne by the person, 

group, or plant requesting the service. 

___________________________________

Chad Nelson, National Meat Supervisor

Quality Assessment Division

Livestock & Poultry Program
[ **SAMPLE]**

Dear PAAT Program Director: This letter invites y ou to apply for y our grant award for the Protection and Advocacy for Assistive Technology

(PAAT) program , as required by Section 5 of the Assistive Technology Act of 1998 , as amended, and the general requirements for all written requests for funding, pursuant to the Education Department General Administrative Regulations (34 CFR Part 76)
. This package consists of the PAAT Assurances and the Certification Regarding Lobbying (Form ED 80
- 0013)
. When submitted, these materials will constitute y our request for PAAT funds for fiscal y ear (FY) [XXXX] , and all subsequent fiscal y ears, until such time as the Protection and Advocacy

sy stem in y our State may be redesignated. To receive PAAT program fund s, please do the following: 1. provide all requested information; 2. sign and date the forms as indicated; and 3. submit the original and one copy of the entire application package to the Commissioner of RSA. To ensure timely

review and approval , please submit y our application to RSA no later than [month/day

/y ear], so that RSA can distribute the FY [XXXX] PAAT funds as soon as they become available
. As these materials contain no confidential information, these application materials will become part of RSA ’s public records once submitted and approved in accordance with the regulations promulgated under the Paperwork Reduction Act (5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3)(v)). We appreciate your commitment to serving individuals with disabilities and meeting the goals of the PAA T program. Please do not hesitate to contact RSA if you have any questions. Sincerely ,

Lyn nae M. Ruttledge Commissioner
Enclosures
# BATON ROUGE METROPOLITAN AIRPORT SUITE 300,TERMINALBUILDING BATONROUGE,LA70807 PHONE (225) 355-0333 FAX (225) 355-2334
March 10,2010
The Honorable Raymond 

### H. LaHood Secretary U.S. Department of 1200 NewJersey Ave.,**~**

..,.. '"
..... v ..for antitrust immunity and proposedjoint Airlines and Japan Airlines. The proposed alliance between these two airlines is vital for oneworld to compete effectively with the Starand SkyTearn alliance. This increased interalliance competition will in turn enhance the benefits ofthe Department's Open Skies policy flrstby solidifying**U~S.:-Japan** Open Skies, then by serving as a foundation for further liberalization acr()ss Asia. After a thorough review, I encourage the Department ofTransportation to approve this application as it would enable these oneworld alliance airlines to work closely together to deliver highly competitive air transportation services. Approval for AA/JAL alliance will have a positive impact on air travel by offering customers more service, scheduling and pricingoptions and will help to ensure that customers continue to benefit from having three competitive air alliances to choose from. I urge you to quickly approve thisapplication.

Jjmai1::amar:ino@brgov.com :! .'

WWH'·flybtr.com
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:**

___ 2014

_______ - NM -

___ 097

_______ - AD **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significan t? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
output_FacilityList

FacilityID met_stationrural_urbanmax_dist model_dist radials circles overlap_distacute

39167NEI11660 Y

54053NEIWV053FELMAN Y

Page 1
output_FacilityList

hours elev multiplier ring1 dep depl phase pdep pdepl

Page 2
output_FacilityList

vdep vdepl All_rcpts user_rcpt bldg_dw urban_pop fastall

Y

Y

Page 3
NO. 03-15-00053-CR 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN 

******************************************************* 

CAUSE NO. 71,785 

IN THE 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF 

BELL COUNTY, TEXAS 

******************************************************* 

KEVIN DUANE DRISDALE APPELLANT 

VS. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE 

******************************************************* 

APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF 

 COMES NOW Appellant, KEVIN DUAN DRISDALE, by and 

through his attorney of record, James H. Kreimeyer, and 

respectfully moves the Court to extend the time for 

filing the Appellant’s Brief in this cause, and in 

support hereof would show the Court as follows: 

ACCEPTED

03-15-00053-CR

4842890

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/10/2015 12:12:20 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/10/2015 12:12:20 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
I. 

On December 8, 2014, Appellant entered a plea 

pursuant to a plea bargain with the prosecutor and 

approved by the Court, and the punishment assessed was 

twenty years (20) in the Texas Department of Criminal 

Justice, Institutional Division. The trial court’s

certificate of Appellant’s Right to Appeal granted 

Appellant’s appeal of the denial of the Motion to 

Suppress. The original notice of appeal filed on 

behalf of Appellant on January 5, 2015, did not address 

the right to appeal denial of a pre-trial motion. 

II. 

An Amended Notice of Appeal was filed on March 31, 

2015, with the Third Court of Criminal Appeals in 

Austin. Appellant’s Record is due for filing with this 

court on April 17, 2015. Appellant’s Brief is due for 

filing with the Court of Appeals on March 27, 2015.

III. 

Appellant’s attorney would respectfully request an 

extension of time to file Appellant’s brief due to the 
late appointment on March 18, 2015 and Appellant’s 

attorney filing a corrected Notice of Appeal delayed 

further filings of docketing statement, designations of 

records. Appellant’s attorney was admitted to the 

emergency room of Scott & White Memorial Hospital on 

Wednesday, April 8, 2015, due to complications of heart 

medicine and released Thursday, April 9, 2015.

This Motion for Extension of Time is not filed for 

the purpose of delay, but so that the ends of justice 

may be served. 

 WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant requests

the Court to grant a forty five (45) day extension of 

time to file the brief herein until May 11, 2015. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ James H. Kreimeyer

 JAMES H. KREIMEYER 

 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT 

 P.O. BOX 727 

 BELTON, TEXAS 76513 

 (254) 939-9393 

 (254) 939-2870 FAX 

 T.S.B. #11722000 

 jkreime@vvm.com 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 This is to certify that a true and correct copy of

the foregoing Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time 

to File Brief was delivered to Henry Garza, District 

Attorney, Bell County Courthouse, Belton, Texas 76513, 

on the 10th day of April 2015. 

 

 /s/ James H. Kreimeyer

 JAMES H. KREIMEYER 

 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:**

___2012

_______ - NM -

____ 11 3

______ - AD **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significan t? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)