alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 110 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 110

     To provide an exception to certain mandatory minimum sentence 
   requirements for a person employed outside the United States by a 
Federal agency, who uses, carries, or possesses the firearm during and 
   in relation to a crime of violence committed while on-duty with a 
             firearm required to be carried while on-duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

 Mr. Burgess introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To provide an exception to certain mandatory minimum sentence 
   requirements for a person employed outside the United States by a 
Federal agency, who uses, carries, or possesses the firearm during and 
   in relation to a crime of violence committed while on-duty with a 
             firearm required to be carried while on-duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCEPTION TO CERTAIN MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCING 
              REQUIREMENTS FOR PERSON EMPLOYED OUTSIDE THE UNITED 
              STATES BY A FEDERAL AGENCY, WHO USES, CARRIES, OR 
              POSSESSES A FIREARM DURING AND IN RELATION TO A CRIME OF 
              VIOLENCE COMMITTED WHILE ON-DUTY WITH A FIREARM REQUIRED 
              TO BE CARRIED WHILE ON-DUTY.

    Section 3261 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(e) Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, if the 
offense is a violation of section 924(c)(1) of this title, the minimum 
sentencing requirements of section 924(c)(1)(A) of this title shall not 
apply if--
            ``(1) the person committed a crime of violence during and 
        in relation to the offense;
            ``(2) an agency of the United States required the person to 
        carry a firearm while on-duty; and
            ``(3) at the time the person used, carried, or possessed 
        the firearm, the person was employed outside the United States 
        by the agency, and was on-duty.''.
                                 <all>
```
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.3.7    
  


 
 

Eighth Amendment to Services Agreement    
  


        This Eighth Amendment to Services Agreement (the "Amendment") is made and entered into this 4 day of February, 2001, by and between The Wet
Seal, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Wet Seal"), Kathy Bronstein ("Bronstein"), with respect to the following facts: 


        The
parties entered into a Services Agreement as of December 30, 1988, as amended ("the Services Agreement"). The parties desire to amend certain terms of the Services Agreement. 


        The
parties therefore agrees as follows: 


        1.
Any terms defined by the Services Agreement as amended shall have the same meanings assigned thereby for purpose of this Agreement. 


        2.
From and after February 4, 2001, Bronstein's Basic Salary shall be Six Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($650,000) per annum, payable semimonthly. 



        3.
Except as amended herein, the Services Agreement as amended is hereby confirmed and republished in full and acknowledged by the parties to be in full force and affect. 


        The
parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written. 



	"Wet Seal"	 	"Bronstein"
	

THE WET SEAL, INC.,

A Delaware Corporation	
 	

 
	

/s/ Irving Teitelbaum
 Irving Teitelbaum

Its: Chairman of the Board	
 	

/s/ Kathy Bronstein
 Kathy Bronstein











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.3.7


Eighth Amendment to Services Agreement
Page 1

CASE NO. 03-14-00668-CV

COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

------------------------------------------------------------------ 

RAFAEL MONTEZ DE OCA, Appellant 

V.

EDUARDO GUTIERREZ, Appellee 

----------------------------------------------------------------- 

APPELLEE’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THIS COURT:

Appellee, Eduardo Gutierrez, makes his second request for an extension of time to 

file his Brief in this cause, and would show: 

1. At present, the deadline for the filing of Appellee’s Brief in this cause is April 

13, 2015. Appellee requests an extension of time until May 4, 2015 to file his Brief. 

2. Appellee requests this extension due to the workload of Appellee’s attorney, 

especially, an expedited proceeding in Texas Education Agency Docket No. 037-LM-03-

2015, styled Austin I.S.D. v. Monica Evans, a pending administrative hearing for April 20-

22, 2105, and the related expedited discovery deadlines (April 2-8, 2015) and expedited 

dispositive motion schedule (deadlines the week of April 13, 2015), and pre-trial 

conference and related deadlines for witness and exhibit list, stipulated facts list, etc. (April 

16 or 17, 2015). 

3. This request for an extension of time should be granted so that justice may 

be done, and because no harm or prejudice is or will be suffered by Appellant by granting 

ACCEPTED

03-14-00668-CV

4832193

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/9/2015 3:57:50 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/9/2015 3:57:50 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Page 2

this request.

4. CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE: On April 9, 2015, Appellee’s 

counsel’s office consulted with Appellant’s counsel, Ray Bass, concerning this request, 

and Mr. Bass does not oppose the request.

WHEREFORE, Appellee requests an extension of time until May 4, 2015 to file his 

Brief, and for such other relief to which Appellant is entitled.

pmorin@austin.rr.com

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on April 9, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above and 

foregoing was served on counsel for Appellant set forth below as follows:

Via email: raybassattorney@gmail.com

Ray Bass

120 W. 8th St.

Georgetown, TX 78626
lNVvm^4-ooiR~CJ?

Tm Tke

FILED IN Court Of (VimWfll Appeals COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ,A j, -r- "*"'

wmoir

Abel Acosta,Clerk J"6e &0/<j fY)^Q^U

\L

Tke £4oi(L Of fesms

RECEIVED IN

"COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

APR 06 2015

Abel Acosta, Cterk

Fr6fv\ Appeal k)q. Q3-)4-aon3-(Lfl

TrlJ (W Mo, Oft/^8fl

f-]ooj CouAjfy

Ftrs4 nnQ-fi&^ Fee E)C-t-eAj5f^Aj of -H/we j-o FAe.

Period fof bis>wt\l&itoy fteuieuj

To Ihe AfcyJogafiUt 3^a£ frf-W^e Court flf'&Wam/ Appeals'*

£nme Mnt^; Joe 0>qm P^-Ot^AlJ, Pefrti&nef flAfcf -Plies

4ka m^tQAj-fer g<o Q)ekA\<tQAj of $uly(b>o) Oa^s j'M gjtucK lo

MDtw; ^ppef/AJ- .sKqujs -fU (jajrf-fke FolloLoUy

TW> Pefrt-yc^er uuav Qow/ici-eJ £*/ 4ki 335 toio'cf Cburf af

Hood (WU jTe/te of Hy», Q-ffedSg fff 4&UQ ff^ftk <W

Vi>> JoeQsM TY^QflA/fl/Ji Tkp pg,-l-rT-<6Ai^r ^ppepW fo -fK^LOJiTT
Of Appeals 5^CQ^ bk±ri'c.{ af Tejflta f^-bOaf-lk,,

T/if (Jq^ Lugj> aFfiw&J dAj fYtarck £L}&6[$

11

"Tfce. pre<>eA/4 de^rlLii {or £;Ly<j 4U- peMuW far

Wis nat f^nej^ej QAf^ e*4eMSc6M pnaf to rfks re^W.

ill

PeriliQdir's fpjquesf fora/v/ fix4eM<<w /s fcqSoc). yp<vi/

•flif.-foliouJiAfo -facfl PtdiwerUJai Aic4 i/nformed of

"Hug cW'tSioi) £rf 4-Ue OjDuA ftf Opprak )fJ Q-fFU^hl<j k/S

ftas-e umUI rV)afck 3\fMiS. £rtuce thai ftW (khh'ater"

Kgs bee^ Q-fW\pftMQ to g^/W fe<y?f represeAi-khw /W //?/i

iftfeflwd p<4ffowgr fkoT kg bJ'U ^ CepresttH kirn qa! /Ae

pgfvKc*) For Pfse-c^k'aMftfu ftytecO'

yviaf/cw g/\fcl e*fe<vKf t^<? Aeqal^t For -A7;/v^ -flU pe^/aM for I)i£Lr<d-roH4ry feui^r/K Cq£e Afe a3-/4-0Q\wCii1o

£5 of"JoAjLg, APES.

Joe 0*/ wcAwaU

(SfrV.oNir pro Se.

7e<A6 Qgpflmen-/- flf £riwvWl TjoS^^g OpU 5kjf ^1 U^fofffcff 7X; &//

Tecj-/D"to/908fc9S
(k.r(iFicgfc of S<LC\s\a^

J> flerfify +M Q-frog <?Mr/ C.^rfcof dopy of 4ho_

Qkocx. aM 'Rxr€.^oi/j<j FUsf nOofi<w for ExfctiSfdA/

pf ftwe. fa fiU Cj Vzf)hbM For fa'\s cce.fionfMy Q&meuJj has bet*! foruKrAtA bc^ US. Mai I} pozfcta e. pre.p?«ri fif^oJg^ ip fU. Ifi4»rtie.y For ShU ^ To^

OT lirrJ OrlcJ>K[\-y 7ToA\c^ G^-kr^ owd to the. £Ufz

^nJy^nJJ

Pckiiotitr pro se
J (W Od>/w rv\ ^fWliy TQc t ^o ffos a?<p h<l}ai$ przsHllL irtearcerokd In fke figfj-leff ^ft Ox* I

LVl4 of fke Tzmj D^pQrJ-fY\€A<-/ of tViMkiJ 3o<rfk€

\H LjQllVifliwacarf Pou^/TfxvK, \Zer)fy'aiud Sedctre.

lAleUr pPKlgliu nf pefjiru [hat tie forecast* 5hkfh*A

c\Cf kuQ aMcf Correct j E/e£olccf Q/f fkis hha

(Y\c-bo«aU

J2d<> flf\ C'0eAinlJ*OHob (-»?$-
Apcl±^m£.

Aket Aras-U , 0. Wk

?6 Roy 19303, C.ApT/Js-fc^, —u^^ms

AA;7V*Ai7ft7//- m0sm

Dmr CfcrIt-.'

UefeMJAArfjb M&fi&i/ -fir Ei^/ddsr&y of ffloe fa F//e

r/&?^e aofi-fyio^p this I[ptfer aAid retoM '<i to

me erf rvuy addreSS skduJM MquJ. . J g/$d request fkerr U6u fljcfffu• ime. oft1i£

o/A<eere.L

Vf) ctfetid&xf; pep <£-

Joe lDoAf jfY) -CWjaIoI- £/<ki$^

BcrtlgffUMff'

loift ArMaVd Or.

BarVLU T)C 7^5//
BAftleff SWf X*>

G

^Hr^

^a**""**^ .•MP** '^l

•&ty*JZ> 9±tH "3iA >'^VT j^ff***^

32.APR 2015 PM5 I. ••£^>**M. '^^•IVxMI**!**'^

5

P£> feox )P3o<§ CVpW .SM'V

r'Si:' i i 230G09 I»i..|.'Im».I.|.I»/|U|I.|.h,.|IH..„I|.J.J.|.,iI"|,.„|,.I,.
2006 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

2-21-2006

Lane v. Local 2-286

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 05-4066

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Lane v. Local 2-286" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 1557.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/1557
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

NO. 05-4066

________________

GWENDOLYN LANE,

 Appellant

 v.

LOCAL UNION 2-286

____________________________________

On Appeal From the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civ. No. 04-cv-01763)

District Judge: Honorable Gene E. K. Pratter

_______________________________________

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

FEBRUARY 8, 2006

Before: ROTH, RENDELL AND AMBRO, Circuit Judges.

(Filed February 21, 2006)

_______________________

OPINION

_______________________

PER CURIAM

Gwendolyn Lane appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Pennsylvania, dismissing her complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
2

12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We will affirm the

Court’s judgment.

We note that Lane complains in her brief that the District Court “failed to take my

complaint serious [sic].” On the contrary, we find that the District Court generously

construed Lane’s complaint and thoroughly addressed any issue it conceivably raised. 

The Court properly dismissed the complaint for the reasons it stated in its memorandum

of July 19, 2005: Lane’s complaint was untimely, as it was not filed within the 6-month

statute of limitations; see DelCostello v. Int’l Brotherhood of Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151,

169, 172 (1983); her suit was barred by her failure to file a grievance with the Union

within five days of her termination as required by the Collective Bargaining Agreement;

and any discrimination claims that were arguably raised by the complaint were barred by

her failure to file a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or

the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission.

For the reasons stated by the District Court, we will affirm.
# AVS

Quality Management System Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with SB QPM# AIR·ANM·030·F7 Date: December 17, 2008 Revision 1 

# Record ofContacts 

# rlFJ/O-{):ll7 FDMSDocket

No.FAA-~-

__ - _ With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Person Contactea Date Boeing Norm black July 29, 2009 ATA JoeWhite July 29, 2009

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED Check the Master List 10Verify That This is the Correct Revision Before Use
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 111 

To amend section 416 of title 39, United States Code, to remove the authority 

of the United States Postal Service to issue semipostals except as provided for by an Act of Congress, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. BURGESS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend section 416 of title 39, United States Code, to 

remove the authority of the United States Postal Service 

to issue semipostals except as provided for by an Act 

of Congress, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Semipostal Stamp 

5 Clarification Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 111 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 

2 SEMIPOSTAL STAMP AUTHORITY. 

3 Section 416 of title 39, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(b) LIMITED AUTHORITY.—The Postal Service may 

8 issue and sell semipostals under this section only for such 

9 purposes or causes as provided for by an Act of Con10 gress.’’; 

11 (2) in subsection (d)— 

12 (A) in paragraph (1)— 

13 (i) by striking ‘‘appropriate agency or 

14 agencies’’ and inserting ‘‘appropriate agen15 cy or entity, as provided for by an Act of 

16 Congress pursuant to subsection (b),’’; and 

17 (ii) by striking ‘‘such agency’’ and in18 serting ‘‘such agency or entity’’; 

19 (B) by striking paragraph (2); and 

20 (C) by redesignating paragraph (3) as 

21 paragraph (2); 

22 (3) by striking subsection (e); and 

23 (4) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as 

24 subsections (e) and (f), respectively. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Lafayette Square Gulf Coast BDC, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”), I, Damien Dwin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 25, 2022By:/s/ Damien DwinDamien DwinPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT
32


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of QUANTUM ENERGY, INC.  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended November 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sharon Farris,President and Chief
Executive Officer (acting principal financial officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:
January 13, 2010














By:           /s/
Sharon Farris





Sharon
Farris


President
and Chief Executive Officer (acting principal financial
officer)
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Left Behind Games, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, I, Troy A. Lyndon, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer and Financial/Accounting Officer) of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:  1. Such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the quarter ending March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: October 22, 2009 /s/ Troy A. Lyndon Troy A. Lyndon Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer) (Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)
Motion Denied; Order filed April 9, 2015. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00787-CV

____________

SARITA GARG, SMITH & GARG, LLC AND GARG & ASSOCIATES, PC, 

Appellants

V.

TUAN M. PHAM, Appellee

On Appeal from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2008-43381

ORDER

Appellee filed a motion to correct and supplement the clerk’s record, citing 

to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 13.1 and 34.6(c), which apply to reporter’s 

records. Rule 34.5(c) applies to supplementation of the clerk’s record and provides:

If a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk’s record, the trial court, 

the appellate court, or any party may be letter direct the trial court clerk to 

prepare, certify, and file in the appellate court a supplement containing the 

omitted item. 
Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). 

Appellee’s motion is denied. Appellee may request supplementation of the 

clerk’s record directly from the Harris County District Clerk. See Tex. R. App. P. 

34.5(c). “A party requesting that an item be included in the clerk’s record must 

specifically describe the item so that the clerk can readily identify it.” Tex. R. App. 

P. 34.5(b)(2). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby.
# README

# Class I Differentials 08-31-22
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of ZAGG Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert G. Pedersen II, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ ROBERT G. PEDERSEN IIRobert G. Pedersen IIChief Executive OfficerMay 10, 2011
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Mark Lana, the President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of HS3 Technologies, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of HS3 Technologies, Inc. for the six months ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HS3 Technologies, Inc.

Date: December 13, 2005
| /s/ Mark Lana |
|---------------|

Mark Lana 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)
# Data

# New Table 1_Inde

# New Table 1 Redesigned

# NewFig1Redesigned

Index (base year 2000 = 100)

# Secondary Auction Data
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1135 

To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to authorize advance 

appropriations for the Indian Health Service by providing 2-fiscal-year 

budget authority, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2019 

Mr. YOUNG (for himself, Mr. COLE, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Ms. HAALAND, Mr. 

LUJA ́N, Mr. MULLIN, and Mr. RUIZ) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the 

Committees on Natural Resources, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to authorize advance appropriations for the Indian Health 

Service by providing 2-fiscal-year budget authority, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Indian Health Service 

5 Advance Appropriations Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1135 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADVANCE APPROPRIATIONS FOR CERTAIN INDIAN 

2 HEALTH SERVICE ACCOUNTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 825 of the Indian Health 

4 Care Improvement Act (25 U.S.C. 1680o) is amended— 

5 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘There are au6 thorized’’; and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(b) For each fiscal year, beginning with the first fis9 cal year that starts during the year after the year in which 

10 this subsection is enacted, discretionary new budget au11 thority provided for the Indian Health Services and Indian 

12 Health Facilities accounts of the Indian Health Service 

13 shall include advance discretionary new budget authority 

14 that first becomes available for the first fiscal year after 

15 the budget year. 

16 ‘‘(c) The Secretary shall include in documents sub17 mitted to Congress in support of the President’s budget 

18 submitted pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United 

19 States Code, for each fiscal year to which subsection (b) 

20 applies detailed estimates of the funds necessary for the 

21 Indian Health Services and Indian Health Facilities ac22 counts of the Indian Health Service for the fiscal year fol23 lowing the fiscal year for which the budget is submitted.’’. 

24 (b) SUBMISSION OF BUDGET REQUEST.—Section 

25 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, is amended by 

26 adding at the end the following new paragraph: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1135 IH

1 ‘‘(40) information on estimates of appropria2 tions for the fiscal year following the fiscal year for 

3 which the budget is submitted for the following ac4 counts of the Indian Health Service: 

5 ‘‘(A) Indian Health Services. 

6 ‘‘(B) Indian Health Facilities.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS