alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1103 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1103

 To amend the market name of genetically altered salmon in the United 
                    States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2019

 Mr. Young (for himself, Mr. DeFazio, and Ms. Bonamici) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the market name of genetically altered salmon in the United 
                    States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Genetically Engineered Salmon 
Labeling Act''.

SEC. 2. PURPOSES.

    It is the purpose of this Act to--
            (1) ensure that consumers in the United States can make 
        informed decisions when purchasing salmon; and
            (2) authorize an independent scientific review of--
                    (A) the possible effects of genetically engineered 
                salmon on wild salmon stocks; and
                    (B) the Food and Drug Administration's approval of 
                genetically engineered salmon for human consumption.

SEC. 3. MARKET NAME FOR GENETICALLY ENGINEERED SALMON.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for 
purposes of applying the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 301 et seq.), the acceptable market name of any salmon that is 
genetically engineered shall include the words ``Genetically 
Engineered'' or ``GE'' prior to the existing acceptable market name.
    (b) Definition.--For purposes of this section, salmon is 
genetically engineered if it has been modified by recombinant DNA 
(rDNA) techniques, including the entire lineage of salmon that contain 
the rDNA modification.

SEC. 4. THIRD-PARTY REVIEW OF CERTAIN SALMON APPROVAL.

    The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall ensure that an 
independent scientific organization conducts a review of the 
environmental assessment that was carried out by the Food and Drug 
Administration in support of an approval of a new animal drug 
application related to AquAdvantage Salmon, dated November 12, 2015.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 11



                         BENTHOS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

                       Computation of Earnings per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
 
                                               YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                              1996       1995       1994
 
<S>                                       <C>          <C>        <C>
Net income                                 $1,171,334   $161,807   $205,025
                                           ----------   --------   --------
 
Weighted average common shares                
 outstanding                                  793,685    817,597    866,151
 
Common stock equivalents outstanding,
 pursuant to the treasury stock            
 method                                        77,596     72,514      5,260
                                           ----------   --------   --------
 
Weighted average number of common and
common equivalent shares outstanding          871,281    890,111    871,411
                                           ==========   ========   ========
 
Net income per common and common           
 equivalent share outstanding              $     1.34   $    .18   $    .24
                                           ==========   ========   ========
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 33 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 33

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
  relating to contributions and expenditures with respect to Federal 
                               elections.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 24, 2019

 Mr. Yarmuth (for himself and Mr. Cohen) submitted the following joint 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
  relating to contributions and expenditures with respect to Federal 
                               elections.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Financial expenditures, or in-kind equivalents, with 
respect to a candidate for Federal office, without regard to whether or 
not a communication expressly advocates the election or defeat of a 
specified candidate in the election, shall not constitute protected 
speech, as guaranteed by this Constitution or any amendment to this 
Constitution.
    ``Section 2. Congress shall have the power to enact a mandatory 
public financing system to provide funds to qualified candidates in 
elections for Federal office, which shall be the sole source of funds 
raised or spent with respect to Federal elections.
    ``Section 3. Congress shall have power to enforce the provisions of 
this article by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, David D’Addario, certify that: 

1. Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wise Metals Group LLC; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter covered by this report (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 15, 2007
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: April 27, 2010 |  |  |  | /S/    JEFFREY
KATZENBERG            
|                      |  |  |  | Jeffrey Katzenberg                   
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer              
|                      |  | 
|Dated: April 27, 2010 |  |  |  | /S/    LEWIS W.
COLEMAN              
|                      |  |  |  | Lewis W. Coleman                     
|                      |  |  |  | President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32



WRITTEN STATEMENT

OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



The undersigned hereby certify that, to the best of the knowledge of the undersigned, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2005 filed by Benthos, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.



|                         |  |  |  |                            |  |                                                       
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: December 23, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    RONALD L. MARSIGLIO
|                         |  |  |  |                            |  | Ronald L. Marsiglio                                   
|                         |  |  |  |                            |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                 
|                         |  |  | 
|                         |  |  |  |                            |  | /s/    FRANCIS E. DUNNE, JR.                          
|                         |  |  |  |                            |  | Francis E. Dunne, Jr.                                 
|                         |  |  |  |                            |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
Order entered April 9, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00124-CV

ALPHA OMEGA CHL, INC., Appellant

V.

BRIAN P. MIN, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-07799

ORDER

We GRANT the April 8, 2015 motion of Sharron Rankin, Official Court Reporter of the 

160th Judicial District Court, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s 

record shall be filed by APRIL 13, 2015. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

ALFREDO JUNIOR VARGAS,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 928 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8868]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Board of Governors; Sunshine Act Meeting

Board Votes To Close March 30, 2012, Meeting

    By telephone vote on March 30, 2012, members of the Board of 
Governors of the United States Postal Service met and voted unanimously 
to close to public observation its meeting held in Washington, DC, via 
teleconference. The Board determined that no earlier public notice was 
possible.

ITEMS CONSIDERED: 
    1. Strategic Issues.
    2. Financial Matters.

GENERAL COUNSEL CERTIFICATION: The General Counsel of the United States 
Postal Service has certified that the meeting was properly closed under 
the Government in the Sunshine Act.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Requests for information about the 
meeting should be addressed to the Secretary of the Board, Julie S. 
Moore, at (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8868 Filed 4-9-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
?ns^ fiPR 13 AH 8: ho

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent,

v.

MARTIN PANG,

Appellant.

No. 70442-7-

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

FILED: April 13, 2015

Per Curiam — Martin Pang appeals an order denying his motion to terminate

the legal financial obligations (LFOs) imposed following his 1998 guilty pleas to four

counts of manslaughter. He contends the initial ten-year collection period for the

LFOs expired when itwas not extended in 2008. The State argues, and the superior

court ruled, that Pang's initial ten-year collection period does not commence until he

is released from total confinement. We agree and affirm.

For purposes of collecting restitution, RCW 9.94A.753(4) provides that an

offender

shall remain under the court's jurisdiction for a term of ten years

following the offender's release from total confinement or ten years

subsequent to the entry of the judgment and sentence, whichever

period ends later. Prior to the expiration of the initial ten-year period,

the superior court may extend jurisdiction under the criminal judgment

an additional ten years for payment of restitution.

Virtually identical statutory language applies to the collection of other legal financial

obligations. RCW 9.94A.760(4).
No. 70442-7-1/2

In 1998, the trial court ordered Pang to pay various costs, assessments, and

restitution. He has been continuously incarcerated since his sentencing.

Accordingly, under RCW 9.94A.753(4) and 9.94A.760(4), his initial ten-year collection

period has not yet commenced. The fact that the superior court mistakenly notified

Pang in 2007 that it intended to extend the initial collection period and then failed to

do so is of no moment. The initial ten-year period will not commence until Pang is

released from total confinement.

Affirmed.

FOR THE COURT:
**EXHIBIT 31.4**

 

I, Michael B. Clauer, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to report on Form 10-K of Bemis Company, Inc.; and

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date   | March 21, 2019 |   | By                                                                     | /s/ Michael B. Clauer |
|--------|---------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|   |                |   | Michael B. Clauer, Senior Vice President and Chief   Financial Officer |

 

----
Figure 1. Philadelphia Annual Design Value H

1999-2001 I

15.114.1 inc-a14.3 inc-a15.5 inc-na 14.7 inc-a 14.6 inc-a16.6 15.3 15.1

14.2 inc-a 14.1 inc-a 14.4 inc-a 14.2 inc-a 14.5 inc-a14.6 inc-a 14.5 inc-a 14.0 inc-a 13.7 13.814.3 inc-a 14.0 13.5 12.813.4 inc-a 14.1 inc-a 14.3 13.9

14.6 inc-a 15.1 inc-na 14.8 inc-a

15.0 inc-a 15.’ 15.4 15.1

13.8 inc-a 14.0 14.1 13.2 inc-a

t Annual designations

based on 2001-2003 data

13.3 i

12.0 inc-a 11.8 i13.2 13.2 14.2 inc-a 14.2 i15.0 15.0 

12.2 inc-a 12.5 i12.4 inc-a 12.4 i13.9 inc-a 13.8 i10.6 inc-a14.7 inc-a 15.5 i

12.7 inc-a 12.7 i

15.0 i

• Six sites have registered (valid) violating DVs since designation• Five of the six have subsequently posted valid “meeting NAAQ

• The sixth site (420290100) has not proven clean data subseque

15.,13.

• Annual Design Values site

2000-2002 I_2001-2003 I_2002-2004 I_2003-2005 I 2004-2006 I_2005-2

state county

Delaware New CastiDelaware New CastiDelaware New CastiDelaware New CastiDelaware New Casti

New Jersey CamdenNew Jersey CamdenNew Jersey GloucesteiNew Jersey Gloucestei

Pennsylvania Bucks

Site A - Pennsylvania Chester

Pennsylvania DelawarePennsylvania MontgomPennsylvania PhiladelpiPennsylvania PhiladelpiPennsylvania PhiladelplPennsylvania PhiladelpiPennsylvania PhiladelpiPennsylvania Philadelpi

Pennsylvania PhiladelpiPennsylvania PhiladelpiPennsylvania PhiladelpiPennsylvania PhiladelplPennsylvania Philadelpi

100031003100031007100031011100031012100032004

340070003340071007340150004340155001

420170012420290100420450002420910013421010003421010004

421010014421010020421010024421010027421010047421010052

421010055421010057421010136

13.513S15.l5.

12.814.414.311.914.413.0

inc-ainc-a

inc-ainc-ainc-ainc-a

15.3 15.3 15.2 14.4

14.5 inc-a 13.9 inc-a 12.8 inc-a

14.5 inc-a 14.6 inc-a 14.3 13.814.1 inc-a 14.3 inc-a 13.8 inc-a 13.2

23.4 inc-na 23.4 inc-na

16.6 16.6 16.2 15.4 15.2 15.0 inc-a

13.1 inc-a 13.1 inc-a 13.1 inc-a

15.3 inc-na 15.2 14.9 inc-a 13.6 13.7 inc-a 13.4 inc-a

12.0 i13.6 i

latest violation; this is the Site A
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
FalconTarget, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the
fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

FalconTarget, Inc.

Date: February 14, 2007

By:   /s/   Thomas Kirchner

Thomas Kirchner

Chief Executive Officer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 60348 Summary Calendar

IBRAHIM LANGO ODUK , Petitioner

v.

LORETTA LYNCH , U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL , Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A097 683 021

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ibrahim Lango Oduk , a native and citizen of Kenya, petitions this court for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal of the order of an immigration judge (IJ) denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Oduk contends that the BIA erred when it determined that he abandoned his challenge to the IJ’s denial of his claim for relief under the CAT.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 14, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-60348 Document: 00513422314 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/14/2016N o. 15

- 60348

2 He ar gues that he sufficiently presented the issue to the BIA by rais ing it in his notice of appeal. Oduk further contends that the CAT claim should have been considered separately from his other claims because the agency’s adverse credibility determination is not dispositiv e of his CAT claim. Judicial review of a final removal order is available only where the alien has exhausted all administrative remedies of right. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1). Because the exhaustion requirement is statutorily mandated, an alien’ s failure to exhaust an issue before the BIA is a jurisdictional bar to this court’s consideration of the issue. Wang v. Ashcroft , 260 F.3d 448, 452 (5th Cir. 2001). “An alien fails to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to an issue
when the issue is not raised in the first instance before the BIA

— either on direct appeal or in a motion to reopen.” Id . at 452

- 53. When an alien elects to submit a brief to the BIA, “that brief becomes the operative document through which any issues that a peti tioner wishes to have considered must be raised.” Claudio v. Holder , 601 F.3d 316, 319 (5th Cir. 2010). Oduk concedes that he d id not raise his CAT claim in his appellate brief before the BIA. Oduk also failed to raise in his brief to the BIA his content ion that the IJ erred by failing to separately analyze his CAT claim. Therefore,
the only issues Oduk raises in his petition for review are unexhausted, and this court lacks jurisdiction to consider them. See Claudio , 601 F.3d at 319; Wang , 260 F.3d at 4 52. Accordingly, Oduk’s petition for review is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Case: 15-60348 Document: 00513422314 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/14/2016