alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

I, Russell C. Taylor, President and Chief Executive Officer of CelluTissue Holdings, Inc., certify that:

 

1.       Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cellu Tissue Holdings,Inc.  for the period ended November 25,2004;

 

2.       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness****of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has material affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

 

----

 

(b) Any fraud**,** whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  | January 10, 2005                       |   |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |                                   |
|   | /s/ Russell C. Taylor                  |   |
|   | Russell C. Taylor                      |
|   | President and Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

 

I, John S. Buchanan, Chief Financial Officer of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge: 

 

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and 

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theRegistrant. 

 

Dated: May 9, 2005 

 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust and will be retained by Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
1517 WEST FRONT STREET SUITE 354 TYLER, TX 75702 TEL: 903-593-8471 FAX: 903-593-2193

Serving Anderson, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith, Trinity, Upshur, Van 

Zandt and Wood Counties

www.12thcoa.courts.state.tx.us

CHIEF JUSTICE

JAMES T. WORTHEN

JUSTICES

BRIAN HOYLE

GREG NEELEY

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

CLERK

CATHY S. LUSK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

MARGARET HUSSEY

April 7, 2015

Ms. Lois Rogers

District Clerk, Smith County

Courthouse, Suite 204

100 North Broadway Avenue

Tyler, TX 75702-7201

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 12-14-00096-CR, 12-14-00097-CR, 

12-14-00098-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 114-0549-09, 114-0550-09, 114-0551-09

Style: Demaria Travar Woods

v.

The State of Texas

Pursuant to Rule 18.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, enclosed herewith is the 

Mandate issued in the above causes. When the District or County Clerk has executed the 

Mandate in accordance with the opinion of this Court, the Clerk is requested to fill in the 

information below and to return the attached copy to this office.

Very truly yours,

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:_____________________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

CC: Mr. Austin R. Jackson (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Michael J. West (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mandate executed on __8TH__ day of __APRIL_______________, 2015.

Brief explanation of action taken: ___SCANNED_______________________________________

____________LINDA RHYMES________________________________District/County Clerk

FILE COPY

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 4/8/2015 2:12:07 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 96 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to ensure 

that an Act of Congress that increases the number of judges comprising 

the Supreme Court may not take effect before the date that is 10 

years after the date of the enactment of such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2020 

Mr. COLLINS of Georgia (for himself, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. SMUCKER, 

Mr. GIBBS, Mr. RESCHENTHALER, Mr. KEVIN HERN of Oklahoma, Mr. 

WALTZ, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. JOHN W. ROSE of Tennessee, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. BUCK, and Mr. CRAWFORD) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to ensure that an Act of Congress that increases 

the number of judges comprising the Supreme Court 

may not take effect before the date that is 10 years 

after the date of the enactment of such Act. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 96 IH 

1 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

2 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

3 States: 

4 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

5 ‘‘An Act of Congress that increases the number of 

6 judges comprising the Supreme Court may not take effect 

7 before the date that is 10 years after the date of the enact8 ment of such Act.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Agricultural

Marketing

Service 

Federal Grain Inspection 

Service

Field Management 

Division 

1400 Independence Ave. 

SW, Stop 3630

Washington, D.C. 20250

Voice (202) 720-0228

Fax (202) 690-3951

Hotline 1-800-998-3447

Reference #230 February 19, 2010

TO: FGIS POLICY BULLETIN BOARD

FROM: Robert Lijewski, Acting Director 

 Field Management Division 

SUBJECT: Transferring Sublots

ORIGINATING OFFICE: Policies, Procedures, and Market Analysis Branch

1. PURPOSE

This memorandum provides FGIS policy for transferring sublots from 

lot-to-lot on average quality shipments loaded under the CuSum 

loading plan. 

2. BACKGROUND

The CuSum plan represents an online acceptance sampling plan 

providing continuous quality information with the goal of maintaining 

a consistent minimum quality throughout the lot. The applicant for 

inspection, based on the contract requirements, may specify factors and 

other criteria as minimum, maximum, or absolute limits (e.g., no sublot to 

exceed). Additionally, the applicant can specify average quality on some 

or all of the factors encompassing the grade determination.

Average grade applies to grade factors, moisture, and some official 

criteria factors. It does not apply to odor, condition, and aflatoxin test 

results exceeding the Food and Drug Administration‘s (FDA) action limit 

of 20 parts per billion (ppb).

Uniformity between sublots and within sublots (component results) is 

not applied and inspection plan tolerances (CuSum values) are not used 

when average quality is requested. All other parts of the Grain Inspection 

handbook, Book III, Chapter 1, apply to an average quality lot.

Material portions cannot occur on individual factors that are declared 

“average” in quality. However, material portions may still occur for 

odor, condition, sample grade criteria (e.g., stones), factors that have 

minimum/maximum or absolute limits, or aflatoxin that exceeds FDA 

action limits.
Page 2

When average quality is specified for a particular factor(s) it is the 

responsibility of the shipper to maintain the overall quality of the lot. 

Self imposed limits (e.g, maximum 1.5% foreign material) that are not 

listed in the load order document do not qualify an individual sublot 

to be determined as a material portion because the self imposed limit 

was violated.

3. POLICY

Since material portions cannot occur on quality factors loaded under 

“average” criteria the shipper does not have an option of moving a 

sublot meeting “average” load order specifications to another lot with 

the same or different quality grain. Only sublots that are determined 

to be material portions (e.g., odor, sample grade factor(s)) may be 

transferred to another lot. This provision is only applicable when the 

load order for the destined lot allows the material portion factor found 

in the sublot analysis.

4. FILING INSTRUCTIONS

Retain a copy of this memo with the Grain Inspection Handbook, Book 

III, until the handbook is revised.

5. QUESTIONS 

Direct any questions concerning this policy to

AMS - FGIS Policies Procedures Market Analysis Branch.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,804

EX PARTE SHAKARA ROBERTSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. F94-61421-TQ 

IN THE 204 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY TH

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). After a period of deferred adjudication,

Applicant was convicted of aggravated robbery and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment.

Applicant has now obtained affidavits and testimony from four men who admit that they are

the perpetrators of the instant offense and Applicant was not involved in any way. Applicant alleges

that these sworn statements show that he is actually innocent of the offense for which he is

convicted.
The trial court has determined that the newly obtained statements are credible and that

Applicant has proven that he is actually innocent. The State and the trial court both recommend

granting relief. Applicant is entitled to relief on the basis of actual innocence. 

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. F94-61421-TQ in the 204 Judicial District th

Court of Dallas County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the Dallas County Sheriff to

answer the charge against him.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to theTexas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: May 23, 2012

Do Not Publish
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 79 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Removing the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights 

amendment. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That notwithstanding any time limit contained in House 

4 Joint Resolution 208, 92d Congress, as agreed to in the 

5 Senate on March 22, 1972, the article of amendment 
2 

•HJ 79 EH 

1 proposed to the States in that joint resolution shall be 

2 valid to all intents and purposes as part of the United 

3 States Constitution whenever ratified by the legislatures 

4 of three-fourths of the several States. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 13, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 79 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Removing the deadline for the ratification of the 

equal rights amendment.
No. 04-15-00107-CV 

 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT SAN ANTONIO

 

 

JUSTIN V. HAYNES, 

 Appellant

V.

ALICIA BRYAN HAYNES, 

 Appellee

 

On Appeal from Cause No. 2012-Cl-14023, In the 166th Judicial District Court of Bexar 

County, Texas, Honorable David Canales, Presiding 

 

 

ADVISORY REGARDING CLERK’S RECORD 

 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: 

 COMES NOW Appellant Justin V. Haynes and, pursuant to the Court’s 

April 2, 2015 Order, files this advisory addressing the status of the Clerk’s 

Record.

I. 

 On April 2, 2015, the Court entered an order requiring Appellant to 

advise the Court as to the status of the payment of the Clerk’s Record. The 

Bexar County District Clerk provided an invoice with the estimated cost of the 

ACCEPTED

04-15-00107-cv

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

4/13/2015 11:59:06 AM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 04/13/2015 11:59:06 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
2

Clerk’s Record on April 1, 2015. On April 6, 2015, the undersigned delivered a 

check to the District Clerk’s office paying the estimated invoice in full.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Ryan G. Anderson__________

Ryan G. Anderson

State Bar No. 00783546

LAW OFFICES OF RYAN G. ANDERSON,

PLLC

115 E. Travis, Suite 1403

San Antonio, Texas 78205

Tel: (210) 399-0198

Fax: (210) 855-5050

ryan@rgalawpc.com

Richard O. Orsinger

State Bar No. 15322500

Amber Alwais

State Bar No. 00796953

MCCURLEY ORSINGER MCCURLEY 

NELSON & DOWNING, L.L.P.

1717 Tower Life Building

San Antonio, Texas 78205

Tel: (210) 225-5567

Fax: (210) 267-7777

Attorneys for Appellant

Justin V. Haynes

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on April 13, 2015, a true and correct copy of this document was 

served by email pursuant to the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on:

Michael D. Conner

Whitney N. Rawlinson

HIRSCH & WESTHEIMER, P.C.

1415 Louisiana, 36th Floor

Houston, Texas 77002 
3

Biff Pennypacker

WILSON, PENNYPACKER & THOMPSON LLP

8620 N. New Braunfels, Suite 101

San Antonio, Texas 78217

Attorneys for Appellee

Alicia Bryan Haynes

/s/ Ryan G. Anderson__________

RYAN G. ANDERSON
EXHIBIT 31

   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

     I, George Lowrance, hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of Siam Imports Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material Fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this annual report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4. The other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to Siam Imports Inc., including its
subsidiaries, if any, is made known to us by others within  those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report
(the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5.  The other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to our auditors and the audit committee of our board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  that there were no significant deficiencies in the design or operation
of internal controls which could adversely affect our ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have further advised our
auditors that there we are not aware of any material weaknesses in our
internal controls; and

b) that there was no fraud, whether or not material, that involved our
management or other employees who have a significant role in our internal
controls.

6. The other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report
that there were no significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the
date of our most recent evaluation.


                                          SIAM IMPORTS INC., Registrant

Dated: May 22, 2006                       /s/ George Lowrance
                                          By: George Lowrance,
                                              Chief Executive Officer,
                                              Treasuer, Chief Financial
                                              Officer, Principal Accounting
                                              Officer and Director
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Pathology of Alzheimer's Disease.                    

*Date:*                         May 7, 2012.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Alexander Parsadanian, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building 2C/212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9666,                         *parsadaniana@nia.nih.gov.,*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 5, 2012.

Anna Snouffer,

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-8723 Filed 4-10-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

JUSTIN NICHOLSON, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 136 WAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 19th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
----

Action brought on 20 February 2004 by Schunk GmbH and Schunk Kohlenstofftechnik GmbH against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-69/04)

(2004/C 106/143)

Language of the case: German

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 20 February 2004 by Schunk GmbH, Thale (Germany), and Schunk Kohlenstofftechnik GmbH, Heuchelheim (Germany), represented by Rainer Bechtold and Simon Hirsbrunner, lawyers.

The applicants claim that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

In the contested decision the Commission imposed on the applicants a fine in the sum of EUR 30 870 000 for infringement of Article 81(1) EC and Article 53(1) EEA by taking part in a series of agreements and concerted practices on the market in carbon and graphite-based products for electrical and mechanical applications.

In support of their action, the applicants claim, first, that the Commission erred in law by assuming that the first applicant, Schunk GmbH, which is a finance holding company, is jointly and severally liable for the fine imposed on its subsidiary, the second applicant, Schunk Kohlenstofftechnik GmbH (‘SKT’). Further, they plead that the contested decision has an unlawful legal basis, since Article 15 of Regulation 17/62 (1) gives the Commission a margin of discretion in relation to the amount of fines and is therefore incompatible with the principle of legal certainty and with higher ranking Community law. In addition, the Commission discriminated against the applicants relative to other undertakings in fixing the amount of the imposed fines, incorrectly assessed the deterrent effect of the fines and the cooperation of the applicants, and failed to have regard to material circumstances.

----

(1)  EEC Council: Regulation No 17: First Regulation implementing Articles [81] and [82] of the Treaty (OJ, English Special Edition 1959—1962, p. 87).

----