alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004094EN.01004902.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/49

---

Action brought on 2 February 2004 by Orlando Perez-Diaz against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-41/04)

(2004/C 94/134)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 2 February 2004 by Orlando Perez-Diaz, residing in Brussels, represented by M.-A. Lucas, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul decision COM/R/A/1/1999 of the Selection Committee not to place the applicant on the reserve list for that selection, notified to him by letter of 21 January 2003 from the Head of Unit of personnel in the Commission's Directorate-General for Research, on behalf of the Chairman of the Selection Committee; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul decision COM/R/A/1/1999 of the Selection Committee not to place the applicant on the reserve list for that selection, notified to him by letter of 21 January 2003 from the Head of Unit of personnel in the Commission's Directorate-General for Research, on behalf of the Chairman of the Selection Committee;

| — | Order the Commission to pay him damages, of an amount to be assessed by the Court, to compensate for non-material damage and damage to his career resulting from the incorrectness of the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay him damages, of an amount to be assessed by the Court, to compensate for non-material damage and damage to his career resulting from the incorrectness of the contested decision;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The applicant in the present case is the same as in Cases T-102/01 (1) and T-156/03 (2)
  Orlando Perez-Diaz v Commission.

1

2

Orlando Perez-Diaz

Commission

The pleas in law and main arguments are those invoked in Case T-156/03, cited above.

---

(1)  Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 September 2002 ([2002] ECR-SC I-A-165; II-871).

1

(2)  OJ C 171, of 19.7.03, p. 37.

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1064 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1064

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2019

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend title 5, United States Code, to allow whistleblowers to 
              disclose information to certain recipients.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RECIPIENTS OF WHISTLEBLOWER DISCLOSURES.

    Section 2302(b)(8)(B) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``or to the Inspector'' and all that follows through ``such 
disclosures'' and inserting ``the Inspector General of an agency, a 
supervisor in the employee's direct chain of command up to and 
including the head of the employing agency, or to an employee 
designated by any of the aforementioned individuals for the purpose of 
receiving such disclosures''.

SEC. 2. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 11, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Order entered April 6, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00893-CV

REFUGIO GOMEZ, ET AL., Appellants

V.

SOL LY, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-11-06613-D

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s April 1, 2015 motion for second extension of time to file reply 

brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than April 21, 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

REAPPOINTMENTS TO ORPHANS’ 

COURT PROCEDURAL RULES 

COMMITTEE

:

:

:

:

:

No. 805

SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2019, the Honorable Emil A. Giordano, Lehigh 

County, and Kenneth G. Potter, Esquire, Snyder County, are hereby reappointed as 

members of the Orphans’ Court Procedural Rules Committee, commencing January 1, 

2020.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1010 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1010

   To provide that the rule entitled ``Short-Term, Limited Duration 
               Insurance'' shall have no force or effect.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2019

  Ms. Castor of Florida (for herself, Ms. Barragan, Mr. Horsford, Ms. 
  Moore, Ms. Underwood, and Mr. DeSaulnier) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and 
  in addition to the Committees on Education and Labor, and Ways and 
 Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide that the rule entitled ``Short-Term, Limited Duration 
               Insurance'' shall have no force or effect.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT-TERM LIMITED DURATION INSURANCE RULE PROHIBITION.

    The Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of the 
Treasury, and the Secretary of Labor may not take any action to 
implement, enforce, or otherwise give effect to the rule entitled 
``Short-Term, Limited Duration Insurance'' (83 Fed. Reg. 38212 (August 
3, 2018)), and the Secretaries may not promulgate any substantially 
similar rule.
                                 <all>
```
----

**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date:                 May 16, 2007 |   | /s/                Shawn L. Clift      |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                          |   | Shawn                L. Clift          |   |
|                                          |   | Chief                Financial Officer |   |

----
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 11, 2009

d0831 

# Order

September 11, 2009

137664-5(53)

GHASSAN M. SAAB,Plaintiff/Counter-DefendantAppellee/Cross-Appellant,

v SC: 137664-5 COA: 278384; 278772 Genesee CC: 04-079096-CK ALICE FARAH,Defendant/Counter-PlaintiffAppellant/Cross-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 8, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

C ORRIGAN , J., would grant the motion for reconsideration.

M ARKMAN , J., would grant the motion for recons ideration and, on reconsideration,
would reverse for the reasons se t forth in his dissenting statem ent in this case, 483 Mich 1006 (2009).
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00704-CV

IN THE MATTER OF J.G.M., A CHILD

On Appeal from the

138th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2013-DJV-0429-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant although appellant is exempt from payment due to inability to pay 

cost. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 8, 2015
Exhibit 10.5


 


Amendment to

Promissory Note


 


This AMENDMENT (this “AMENDMENT”)
is entered into by and between Company and Holder (each as defined below), effective as of April 20, 2022 (the “Effective Date”),
binding on the undersigned parties as of that date.


 


Odyssey Group International,
Inc. (“BORROWER”) and ____________ (“LENDER”) entered into that certain Promissory Note (the “Note”)
dated December ___, 2021 in the amount of $25,000.00 (the “Loan Amount”). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined have
the meaning set forth in the Note.


 


Whereas,
the parties have agreed to extend the maturity date of the Note subject to the conditions contained herein.


 


AGREEMENT


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.             
Extension of Maturity Date. The Maturity Date of the Note is amended and extended to May 31, 2022.


 


2.             
Effectiveness; Conflict. Except as modified hereby, the Note and terms thereof shall remain in full force
and effect. On and after the effectiveness of this Amendment, each reference in the Notes to “this Agreement,” “hereunder,”
“hereof,” “herein” or words of like import shall mean and be a reference to the Note, as amended by this Amendment.
To the extent the terms of this Amendment conflict with any provision of the Note or any of the documents referenced therein, then the
provisions of this Amendment shall control.


 


3.             
Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed by facsimile transmission and in counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement.


 


4.             
All Other Terms. All other terms and conditions of the Note remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and acknowledging acceptance
and agreement of the foregoing, BORROWER, and LENDER affix their signatures hereto,


 


	Odyssey Group International, Inc.	 	Individual
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:	J. Michael Redmond	 	By:	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:	President	 	An Individual
	 	 	 	 
	Dated:	April 20, 2022	 	Dated:	April 20, 2022
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 94 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the rule submitted by the Internal 

Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury, relating to ‘‘Relief with 

Respect to Employment Tax Deadlines Applicable to Employers Affected 

by the Ongoing Coronavirus (COVID-19) Disease 2019 Pandemic’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 4, 2020 

Mr. LARSON of Connecticut (for himself, Mr. NEAL, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. SUOZZI, Mr. BEYER, Ms. MOORE, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. 

PANETTA, Mr. HORSFORD, Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. HIGGINS

of New York, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. EVANS, Mr. KILDEE, 

Ms. DELBENE, Mr. KIND, Mr. COURTNEY, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. HIMES, 

Mrs. HAYES, and Ms. SEWELL of Alabama) submitted the following joint 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the rule submitted 

by the Internal Revenue Service, Department of the 

Treasury, relating to ‘‘Relief with Respect to Employment Tax Deadlines Applicable to Employers Affected 

by the Ongoing Coronavirus (COVID-19) Disease 2019 

Pandemic’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That Congress 

4 disapproves the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 94 IH 

1 Service, Department of the Treasury, relating to ‘‘Relief 

2 with Respect to Employment Tax Deadlines Applicable to 

3 Employers Affected by the Ongoing Coronavirus (COVID4 19) Disease 2019 Pandemic’’ (Internal Revenue Service 

5 Notice 2020–65), and such rule shall have no force or ef6 fect. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8682]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Board of Scientific Counselors, Office of Infectious Diseases 
(BSC, OID)

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC), announces the following meeting of the aforementioned 
committee:

TIME AND DATE: 8 a.m.-2:50 p.m., May 2, 2012.

PLACE: CDC, Global Communications Center, 1600 Clifton Road NE., 
Building 19, Auditorium B3, Atlanta, Georgia 30333.

STATUS: Open to the public, limited only by the space available.

PURPOSE: The BSC, OID, provides advice and guidance to the Secretary, 
Department of Health and Human Services; the Director, CDC; the 
Director, OID; and the Directors of the National Center for 
Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, the National Center for Emerging 
and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, and the National Center for HIV/AIDS, 
Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC, in the following areas: 
strategies, goals, and priorities for programs; research within the 
national centers; and overall strategic direction and focus of OID and 
the national centers.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The meeting will include reports from the BSC 
OID working groups, brief updates from the infectious disease national 
centers, and focused discussions on CDC's safe water activities, 
immunization infrastructure, and sexually transmitted diseases.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Robin Moseley, M.A.T., Designated 
Federal Officer, OID, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE., Mailstop D10, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone: (404) 639-4461.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: April 5, 2012.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012-8682 Filed 4-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

I, Russell C. Taylor, President and Chief Executive Officer of CelluTissue Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.       The Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the period ended November 25, 2004  fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.       The information containedin such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | January 10, 2005                       |   |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |                                   |
|   | /s/ Russell C. Taylor                  |   |
|   | Russell C. Taylor                      |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
1998 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

9-8-1998

Continental Casualty Co v. D'Andrea

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 97-5004

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1998

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1998 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Continental Casualty Co v. D'Andrea" (1998). 1998 Decisions. Paper 216.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1998/216
Filed September 8, 1998 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

No. 97-5004 

CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY 

v. 

DOMINICK D'ANDREA, INC., 

 Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff 

v. 

ALMONESSON ASSOCIATES; TARQUINI ORGANIZATION; 

THE DOUGLAS COMPANY; JOHN DOE 1-10, being a 

fictitious person, corporation or entity, 

 Third-Party Defendants 

Dominick D'Andrea, Inc., 

 Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

For the District of New Jersey 

(D.C. No.: 93-cv-1765) 

Argued: January 22, 1998 

Before: SLOVITER, LEWIS, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges. 

ORDER AMENDING OPINION 

IT IS ORDERED that the slip opinion in the above case, 

filed on July 10, 1998, be amended as follows: 

Add the following footnote to the concurring opinion to be 

signaled at the end of the text on page 24 of the slip 

opinion: 
Following the filing of this opinion, four district court 

judges of the District of New Jersey who are familiar 

with the magistrate judge in question have informed

me that the magistrate judge is "one of the most 

understanding, patient, and attorney-friendly judges 

[they] know." Nothing in this opinion is intended to 

reflect on the ability of the magistrate judge, nor on his 

behavior or performance in any case other than the 

one at issue. 

By the Court, 

Dolores K. Sloviter 

 Circuit Judge 

Dated: September 8, 1998 

 A True Copy: 

 Teste: 

Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals 

for the Third Circuit
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1032 

To provide for the retention and service of transgender individuals in the 

Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2019 

Ms. SPEIER (for herself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KATKO, Mrs. DAVIS of California, and Mr. BROWN of Maryland) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To provide for the retention and service of transgender 

individuals in the Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RETENTION AND SERVICE OF TRANSGENDER 

4 INDIVIDUALS IN THE ARMED FORCES. 

5 (a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con6 gress that— 

7 (1) individuals who are qualified and can meet 

8 the standards to serve in the military should be eligi9 ble to serve; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1032 IH

1 (2) the policies recommended in the memo2 randum of the Secretary of Defense entitled ‘‘Mili3 tary Service by Transgender Individuals’’ and dated 

4 February 22, 2018, are inconsistent with this goal. 

5 (b) RETENTION OF CURRENTLY SERVING MEMBERS

6 OF THE ARMED FORCES.—An individual serving as a 

7 member of the Armed Forces on or after the date of the 

8 enactment of this Act may not be involuntarily separated 

9 from the Armed Forces, or denied reenlistment or continu10 ation in service in the Armed Forces, solely on the basis 

11 of the member’s gender identity. Nothing in this sub12 section relieves a member from meeting applicable military 

13 and medical standards, including deployability, or requires 

14 retention of the member in service if the member fails to 

15 meet such standards. 

16 (c) ACCESSION INTO THE ARMED FORCES.—On or 

17 after the date of the enactment of this Act, an individual 

18 may not be denied initial enlistment, commissioning, or 

19 other accession into the Armed Forces solely on the basis 

20 of the individual’s gender identity. Nothing in this sub21 section relieves an individual from meeting applicable mili22 tary and medical standards, including deployability, for 

23 enlistment, commissioning, or other accession. 

24 (d) GENDER IDENTITY DEFINED.—In this section, 

25 the term ‘‘gender identity’’ means the gender-related idenVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:15 Feb 19, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1032.IH H1032

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1032 IH

1 tity, appearance, mannerisms, or other gender-related 

2 characteristics of an individual, regardless of the individ3 ual’s designated sex at birth. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 10.21


 


	CERTAIN
    IDENTIFIED INFORMATION HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THIS EXHIBIT BECAUSE IT IS BOTH NOT MATERIAL AND IS THE TYPE THAT THE REGISTRANT TREATS
    AS PRIVATE OR CONFIDENTIAL.