alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Harpreet Singh Sangha, the Chief Executive Officer, and Herminder Rai, the Chief Financial Officer, of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | "Harpreet S. Sangha"Harpreet S. SanghaChief Executive Officer and a director 
Date:  October 20, 2009
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | "Herminder Rai"Herminder RaiSecretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer 
Date:  October 20, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

__________
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 46 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 46

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on February 
                               15, 2019.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, pursuant to section 202 
of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622), the national 
emergency declared by the finding of the President on February 15,

              

 2019, in Proclamation 9844 (84 Fed. Reg. 4949) is hereby terminated.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 26, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 46

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on February 
                               15, 2019.
```
MANDATE

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00991-CV

Gulf Coast Asphalt Company, L.L.C. 

and Trifinery, Inc., Appellants

v.

Russell T. Lloyd, John M. O’Quinn & 

Associates, L.L.P., and John M.

O’Quinn & Associates, P.L.L.C., 

Appellees

Appealed from the 80th District Court 

of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2011-

61780). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Jamison. Justices McCally and Busby 

also participating.

TO THE 80TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals on January 29, 2015, the cause upon appeal to 

revise or reverse your judgment was determined. Our Court of Appeals made its 

order in these words:

This cause, an interlocutory permissive appeal from a partial 

summary judgment order in favor of appellees; Russell T. Lloyd, John 

M. O’Quinn & Associates, L.L.P., and John M. O’Quinn & 

Associates, P.L.L.C.; signed October 21, 2013, was heard on the 

transcript of the record. The record shows that the requirements for a 

permissive appeal pursuant to section 51.014 of the Texas Civil 

Practice and Remedies Code have not been satisfied. Accordingly, we 

withdraw our order of December 12, 2013 granting the motion for 

permissive appeal, deny the motion, and DISMISS the appeal for 

want of jurisdiction.

We order each party to pay their own costs incurred in this 

appeal.
2

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said 

Court in this behalf and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice of our Fourteenth 

Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Houston, April 10, 

2015.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-1384

HURLEY BANKS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus TOWN OF CULPEPER; RICKY ALLEN PINKSAW, Officer for the Town of Culpeper; RICHARD C. BROOKING, Officer for the Town of Culpeper; ROSCOE FORD, Sergeant for the Town of Culpeper; F. T. GIMBEL, Deputy for the County of Culpeper; UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF THE TOWN OF CULPEPER; CHRIS HOCKMAN, Officer for the Town of Culpeper, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-55-C) Argued: November 3, 1995 Decided: July 23, 1996 Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ARGUED: Deborah C. Wyatt, WYATT & CARTER, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Neal Lawrence Walters, GILLIAM, SCOTT & KRONER, P.C., Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: George H. Gilliam, GILLIAM, SCOTT & KRONER, P.C., Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellees.23 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: The plaintiff, Banks, who had been told by the defendant officers to leave, and understanding that he was not to return to, the scene of a riot the officers has just quelled, nevertheless returned and refused to back off from a police car in which was an officer who had been injured in the riot and a participant in the riot who had been arrested. One of the defendant officers ordered the plaintiff arrested, and he claims the arrest was without probable cause, accompanied by excessive force and that he had a First Amendment right to return to the scene of the riot to ask about a friend. We have considered the record and the opinion of the district court and, after oral argument, find that the actions of the officers were entirely reasonable and that there is no reversible error in the decision of the district court. We affirm for the reasons sufficiently expressed in the opinion of the district court. Banks v. Town of Culpeper, 93-055-C (W.D.Va. Feb. 2, 1995).

AFFIRMED
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Bonnie McNamara, the Chief Financial Officer and a Director of HS3 Technologies, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of HS3 Technologies, Inc. for the nine months ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HS3 Technologies, Inc.

Dated May 12, 2006.

/s/ Bonnie McNamara                        

Bonnie McNamara

Chief Financial Officer and Director

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 13, 2016

No. 04-16-00230-CV

IN RE SEMGROUP CORP., 

Rose Rock Midstream, L.P., and Rose Rock Midstream Field Services, LLC

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On April 13, 2016, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an unopposed 

emergency motion for temporary relief. This court is of the opinion that a serious question 

concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(b). The respondent and the real parties in interest may file a response to the petition 

for writ of mandamus in this court no later than May 4, 2016. Any such response must 

conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. 

Relators’ request for temporary relief is GRANTED. The trial court’s order compelling 

the depositions of Norm Szydlowski and Pete Schwiering to occur by April 24, 2016 is 

TEMPORARILY STAYED pending further order of this court. Plaintiffs’ notices of intention to 

take the depositions of Norm Szydlowski and Pete Schwiering beginning April 22, 2016 are also 

TEMPORARILY STAYED pending further order of this court.

It is so ORDERED on April 13, 2016.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: __________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 15-01-13356-ZCV, styled Maribel Rodriguez, Individually and as 

Representative of the Estate of David Rodriguez, Deceased and as Next Friend of Maribel Rodriguez, Alejandro 

Rodriguez and David Rodriguez, Minors; Juan Rodriguez, Individually, and Maria A. Cerda de Rodriguez, 

Individually v. Rose Rock Midstream Field Services, LLC; Rose Rock Midstream, LP; SemGroup Corporation and 

Jesus T. Riojas, pending in the 293rd Judicial District Court, Zavala County, Texas, the Honorable Bill C. White 

presiding.
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- 

### 2..0 

## i 

# (
- OM5 C;;Oi0 -A/AC1-;lCS'-AL:> Directorate Identifier: -AD Estimated Costs: CostsperProduct (e.g., aircraft,engine, Action orooe!ler, aooliance) (e.g., lnspection, Work-hours Labor Parts Cost TotalCosts Numberof Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ U.S. forU.S. Fleet

access,testing, (@$85/h port.» Registered andclose-un) our) Products Incorporation of the revised MPD 

# -- " Section 9 structural 

### 1.0 

### -$ So. GD 

### N/A ~ 00.00 

### 153 

# C$ 0 

# .. inspection ~ I requirements 

# , .' (11) 

## , I' (Ill $ 0



# , II,PO 

# ,. ".1111 $ 0 !! (H" 

# , H.llIJ $ 0 The known number of products in compliance: 0 I Total Costs of compliance for U.S, fleet: !G8 Is Not 

## ,p'

# .?S X j::.

__

} l..'·S t'l
- ,'J') 

# .=

# "tf

### ,'I OC~~',c" In 

### '-'1"' 1".(1 TableBOO5- Costs covered under warranty 

### $0 Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use thisjield to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. Thisjield can also be used to explain warronty costs): 

### N/A
Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?" 

### YEs'D NO

## I8J *Explanation: DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? ~, 

### YEs'D NO

## I8J *Explanation: Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either aYes or No answer. ~ YES 

## D NO 

## I8J Explanation:Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransportation? '.) YES' 

## 0 NO 

## I2J


## *Explanation:
Exhibit 4.2



Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated June 16, 2022, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2117 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-263693) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


June 16, 2022
## NUMBER 13
- 15
- 00339
- C R
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

IN R E THE STATE OF TEXAS EX REL. STEPHEN B. TYLER

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.



## ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes Per Curiam Order

Relator , the State of Texas ex rel. Stephen B. Tyler, f iled a petition for writ of
mandamus in the above cause on July 27 , 2015

. Through this original proc eeding, relator seeks to compel the trial court to vacate the judgment and sentence imposed on July 1 3, 2015 and to convene a sentencing hearing before a properly constituted jury. T he Court requests that the real party in interest , Kyle Thomas Perkins, or any others whose interest
would be dire ctly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See T EX

. R

. A PP

. P

. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM

Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
D elivered and filed the 28 th day of July , 201 5

.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 4298** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. SCOTTY RAY PULLIAM , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. Catherine C. Eagles , District Judge. ( 1:06

- cr - 00015

- CCE

- 1 )

Submitted : November 22, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Ames Colby Chamberlin, LAW OFFICES OF AMES C. CHAMBERLIN, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Michael A. DeFranco, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opin ions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Scotty Ray Pulliam appeals the 21

- month sentence imposed by the district court upon revocation of hi s supervised release. On appeal, Pulliam’s c ounsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. Cal ifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal but questioning whether the district court adequately explained Pulliam’s revocation
sentence . Although notified of his right to do so, Pulliam has not filed a pro s e supplemental brief. Our review of the record reveals no error in the district court’s explanation of Pulliam’s sentence. See United States v. Webb , 738 F.3d 638, 640 (4th Cir. 2013); United States v. Thompson , 595 F.3d 544, 547 (4th Cir. 2010). In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm the district court’s revocation judgment
. This c ourt requires that counsel inform Pulliam , in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Pulliam requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this c ourt for leave to withdraw from represe ntation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Pulliam . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are3 adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional p rocess.

AFFIRMED
# FY15 Vendor Table
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 64

Expressing the sense of the Congress supporting music education and Music

in Our Schools Month.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 15, 2001

Mr. CLEMENT (for himself, Ms. RIVERS, Mr. TIBERI, Mr. HOLT, Mrs. DAVIS

of California, and Mr. BLUNT) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress supporting music

education and Music in Our Schools Month.

Whereas it is one of the objectives of public schools to prepare children for a productive role in our society;

Whereas music and the other arts significantly enhance the

morale of students and the quality of the school environment;

Whereas music education helps students acquire production

and performance skills and an understanding of history

and culture;

Whereas the study of music contributes to the development

of young people by teaching them necessary skills, includ-
2

•HCON 64 IH

ing abstract reasoning, listening, reading, self-expression,

creativity, teamwork, and self-discipline;

Whereas students who participate in school music programs

are less likely to be involved with drugs, alcohol, or delinquent or criminal behavior;

Whereas there is a direct correlation between music instruction and aptitude in math and science;

Whereas music education teaches the skills necessary to succeed in the 21st century workforce and in life; and

Whereas the National Association for Music Education, the

International Music Products Association, and their partners in the education, business, and arts communities are

celebrating March 2001 as Music in Our Schools Month:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) quality music education should be supported

4 in our schools;

5 (2) all students should have access to a well6 balanced, comprehensive, sequential program of

7 music taught by qualified teachers;

8 (3) music educators should be recognized and

9 commended for their concern for and efforts to en10 hance the quality of music education in our schools;

11 and

12 (4) because the observance of Music in Our

13 Schools Month provides an opportunity to dem14 onstrate support for the purposes and practices of
3

•HCON 64 IH

1 music education, the goals and ideas of such an ob2 servance should be supported and teachers, parents,

3 students, the business community, and all citizens

4 should be encouraged to participate.

Æ
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
        ACT OF 2002**
  Pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment
        Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
        undersigned, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
        of
        Directors of the Company, certifies that:
  (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/
                  David LichtensteinDavid
                  LichtensteinChairman,
                  President, and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                  Executive Officer)May
                  15, 2008
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99-2


The following certification accompanies the registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-K and is not filed as provided in SEC Release Nos. 33-8212, 34-47551 and
IC-25967, dated March 21, 2003.



                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002


            In connection with the Annual Report of Lexington Precision
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the President, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

            (1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                       /s/  Warren Delano
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                       Warren Delano
                                       President
                                       (Co-Principal Executive Officer)
                                       March 27, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00067-CR

Cordrecus Dunque Burton

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 1

of Tarrant County (1403862D)

January 5, 2017

Opinion by Justice Sudderth

(p)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Bonnie Sudderth_______________

 Justice Bonnie Sudderth