alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas EmissionsMeeting Documentation: EPA Presentation at SESHADateStaff Contact InformationName ofOrganizationSummary of DiscussionWritten CommentsProvided?Did they alsosubmit to Docket?Date sent to EPACCDApril 28, 2010Scottsdale, AZKirsten Cappel(202) 343-9556cappel.kirsten@epa.govIdentifiedbelow.EPA presentation at SESHA 32ndAnnualInternational High Technology ESHSymposium and Exposition, April 28,2010. Presentation on the ElectronicsManufacturing section of the proposedrule “Mandatory Reporting ofGreenhouse Gases: Additional Sourcesof Fluorinated GHGs.” PowerPointpresentation included in the docket.NA1Participants: Kirsten Cappel, EPA cappelkirsten@epa.gov

Laurie Beu, Consultant to ISMI aurie.beu@ismi.sematech.org

Mike Sherer, Sherer Consulting Services, Inc. Msherereng@aol.com

Tim Higgs, Intel tim.g.higgs@intel.com

Tom Diamond, SIA tdiamond@sia.online.org

Sebastian Raoux, Transcarbon

sraoux@transcarbon.com

Rory McCarthy, Brewer Science Inc. rmmccarthy@brewerscience.com

Jim Gotterba, Alzeta Corp. jgotterba@alzeta.com

John D. Sullivan, Alzeta Corp. jsullivan@alzeta.com

Gus Ballis, Renesas Electronics America gus.ballis@renesas.com

Joe Mattrey, M and W Group joe.mattrey@mwgroup.net

Janet Burggraf, Linear Technology jburggraf@linear.com

James Rubin, Avago Technologies jamie.rubin@avagotech.com

Sam Yee, CS Clean Systems Cs_sam@sbcglobal.net

Gary A Wright, Sandia National Labs gwrigh@sandia.gov

2Ronald Remke, ISMI ron.remke@ismi.sematech.org

Steve Hall, URS Corporation steven_e_hall@urscorp.com

Ignacio Verduzco, International Rectifier

Iverduz1@irf.com

Joel H. Rouillard, Fairchild Semiconductor joel.rouillard@fairchildsemi.com

Michael Williams, HSRMS

mikewehs@aol.com

Allan Abbott, Microchip Technology Inc. alan.abbott@microchip.com

Jack Welsch, Enhesa, Inc. jw@enhesa.com

R. Goyins, Solvay Solexis rgoyins@solvay.com

Doug Kelly Solvay Solexis douglas.kelly@solvay

Scott Brady, Kurt J. Lesker/Solvay

ScottB@lesker.com

James Beasley, SEMATECH james.beasley@sematach.org

Linda Kincaid, Chem Detection, LLC nanosafety@gmail.com

Jim Mayer, ATMI jmayer@atmi.com

Dave Yost, Arizona State University dave.yost@asu.edu

Ken Jeffcoat, Tokyo Electron ken.jeffcoat@us.tel.com

3Defense Microelectronics Activity green@dmea.osd.mil

Vincent DeGiorgio, FM Global vincent.degiorigio@fmglobal.com

Steve Reberge, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. steve.roberge@axcelis.com

Pete Avila, Semiconductor Smart Solutions paavilia@flash.net

Lew Scarpace, Intel Corporation Lewis.P.Scarpace@intel.com

Lisa Wilk, Capaccio Env. Eng, Inc. lwilk@capaccio.com

Susan Capuli, Analog Devices, Inc. susan.capuli@analog.com

Florena Galindo, Analog Devices, Inc. florence.galindo@analog.com

David Lancaster, Fair child Semiconductor

david.lancaster@fairchildsemi.com

Karl Albrecht, Fairchild Semiconductor

karl.albrecht@fairchildsemi.com

Joe Van Gompel, MIDAC Corporation jvangompel@midac.com

Taimur Burki, Intel

taimur.k.burki@inel.com

Jennifer Aiston, Intel jennifer.aiston@intel.com

4
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ABBVIE INC., ABBVIE BIOTECHNOLOGY 

LIMITED,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

THE KENNEDY TRUST RHEUMATOLOGY 

RESEARCH, 

Defendant-Appellant

______________________ 

2014-1672

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of New York in No. 1:13-cv-01358-PAC, 

Judge Paul A. Crotty.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

MICHAEL A. MORIN, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. Also represented by DAVID PENN FRAZIER; CASEY L. DWYER, WILLIAM 

BARRETT RAICH, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett 

& Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC.

MARK ANDREW PERRY, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, 

Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. Also 
 

represented by WAYNE M. BARSKY, TIMOTHY P. BEST, Los 

Angeles, CA; NORMAN H. ZIVIN, JOHN P. WHITE, ROBERT 

THOMAS MALDONADO, Cooper & Dunham, LLP, New York, 

NY. 

. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (WALLACH, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 8, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Benthos, Inc. 

North Falmouth, MA 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Company’s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (FileNo. 333-19425, File No. 333-60301 and File No. 333-50734) of Benthos, Inc. of our report dated October 28, 2005 (except for the matter discussed in Note 10, for which the date is November 2, 2005), relating to the consolidated financial statementsand financial statement schedules, which appear in this Form 10-KSB. 

 

/s/ BDO Seidman,LLP 

 

Boston, Massachusetts 

December 29, 2005
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 100 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale 

to the United Arab Emirates of certain defense articles and services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2020 

Ms. OMAR submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the United Arab Emirates of certain 

defense articles and services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the following proposed foreign military sale to the 

4 United Arab Emirates is prohibited: 

5 (1) The sale of the following defense articles, 

6 including defense services and technical data, de7 scribed in Transmittal No. 21–01, submitted to Con8 gress pursuant to section 36(b) of the Arms Export 

9 Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)) and published in 

10 the Congressional Record on November 10, 2020: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 100 IH 

1 Fifty (50) F–35A Joint Strike Fighter Conventional 

2 Take-Off and Landing (CTOL) Aircraft; Fifty-four 

3 (54) Pratt & Whitney F–135 Engines (up to 50 in4 stalled and 4 spares); Electronic Warfare Systems; 

5 Command, Control, Communications, Computer and 

6 Intelligence/Communications, Navigational, and 

7 Identification (C4I/CNI); Autonomic Logistics Glob8 al Support System (ALGS); Operational Data Inte9 grated Network (ODIN); Air System Training De10 vices; Weapons Employment Capability and other 

11 Subsystems, Features, and Capabilities; F–35 

12 unique chaff and infrared flares; reprogramming 

13 center access; F–35 Performance Based Logistics; 

14 software development/integration; aircraft ferry and 

15 tanker support; aircraft and munitions support and 

16 test equipment; communications equipment; provi17 sioning, spares, and repair parts; weapons repair 

18 and return support; personnel training and training 

19 equipment; weapon systems software, publications, 

20 and technical documents; United States Government 

21 and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics 

22 support services; and other related elements of 

23 logistical and program support. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

I, James A. Konrath,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust (the Registrant), do hereby certify pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of
title 18, United States Code) that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this
certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



|                        |  |     |  |                                                  
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated: October 19, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ James A. Konrath                             
|                        |  |     |  | James A. Konrath                                 
|                        |  |     |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Accredited Mortgage
Loan REIT Trust and will be retained by Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
E.O. 12866 Review 2060-AQ42 Email 011811 .txt From: Nizich.Sharon@epamail.epa.gov Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 2:56 PM To: cortney_higgins@omb.eop.gov Cc: Fruh.Steve@epamail.epa.gov; tierney.jan@epamail.epa.gov; Stewart.Michael@epamail.epa.gov; Hanzel, Veronica; Laney, Michael N.; Talcott.Fred@epamail.epa.gov; French.Chuck@epamail.epa.gov; Topham.Nathan@epamail.epa.gov; Guinnup.Dave@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Part of E.O. 12866 Review: EPA Staff Response to OMB questions pertaining to Primary Lead RTR, RIN 2060-AQ42

CortneyPlease find two additional answers to questions asked last week. Thank you.

1. What is the background on why elemental lead is exempt in Sec 112?

Jan couldn't find anything in the legislative history that addressed section 112(b)(7). It looks like it was part of the Senate version of the CAA Amendments, but she could find no Senate Report language discussing that provision.

2. What was the litigation concerning the overlap of Sec 112 and lead NAAQS requirements?

The case that OMB is thinking of is National Lime, 233 F3d 625. Industry claimed that our use of PM as a surrogate for metal HAP in the portland cement MACT was a de facto regulation of PM as a HAP. The Court referred to language in 112(b)(2), which prohibits EPA from adding to the list of HAP any criteria pollutant and stated that this prohibition would extend to any rule that "in effect treats a criteria pollutant as a HAP." The court found that EPA did not do so, as the regulations are particular to cement kilns and does not treat PM "generally" as a HAP. 233 F3d at 638.

CORTNEY - Jan is unable to make the call tomorrow so if you have any other legal questions, perhaps you can send to me with a cc to Jan so that she may have time to get back to us. THANK YOU.

Sharon V. Nizich Metals and Minerals Group Sector Policies and Programs Division OAQPS - US EPA RTP NC 27711 919/541-2825

Page 1
JERRY LEE NICHOLS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-417

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 6, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

James B. Fensom, Judge.

Jerry Lee Nichols, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
```

                                                                      Exhibit 23

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-91367 and 333-66622) pertaining to employee benefit plans, of
BNS  Holding,  Inc. of our report dated  February 10, 2006,  with respect to the
consolidated  financial  statements of BNS Holding,  Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Providence, Rhode Island
March 2, 2006
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-3198

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Ezra Robert Gramm

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

____________

 Submitted: April 3, 2015

Filed: April 10, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Ezra Gramm directly appeals the sentence imposed by the district court after 1

he pleaded guilty to sexual exploitation of a child. His counsel has moved to

The Honorable Greg Kays, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the

1

Western District of Missouri.
withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

raising an argument that the sentence was unreasonable. We conclude that Gramm’s

appeal waiver should be enforced and prevents consideration of the claim. See

United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review of validity

and applicability of appeal waiver); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 890-92 (8th

Cir. 2003) (en banc) (court should dismiss appeal where it falls within scope of

waiver, plea agreement and waiver were entered into knowingly and voluntarily, and

no miscarriage of justice would result). Gramm has filed a supplemental pro se brief,

arguing that his sentence was unconstitutional based on a conviction he received in

Missouri state court. We conclude that Gramm’s sentence did not violate double

jeopardy because the state and federal sentences punished different conduct, see

Monge v. California, 524 U.S. 721, 727-28 (1998) (double jeopardy clause of Fifth

Amendment protects against multiple criminal punishments for the same offense), and

we see no other basis for a constitutional challenge. Finally, having reviewed the

record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no

nonfrivolous issues outside the scope of the waiver.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw, subject to counsel informing appellant about

procedures for seeking rehearing or filing a petition for certiorari.

______________________________

-2-
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Airbee Wireless, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for
the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I Sundaresan Raja, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of the operations of the Company. /s/ Sundaresan Raja
Sundaresan Raja
Chief Executive Officer July 21, 2005
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 17, 2009 

s0610 

Order 

 

June 17, 2009 

138275 

KEVIN KELLER, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

v SC: 138275 

 COA: 287440 

Ingham CC: 07-001643-AA 

PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES 

RETIREMENT SYSTEM and PUBLIC SCHOOL 

EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD, 

Respondents-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 14, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 KELLY, C.J., and CAVANAGH and HATHAWAY, JJ., would remand this case to the 

Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
 
I, **Antonia Bold-de-Haughton**, certify that:

(1)        I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2007 of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc.;

(2)        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)        The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)        Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)        The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:     October 19, 2007.
*"Antonia Bold-de-Haughton"

By:       **Antonia Bold-de-Haughton***
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 78 (Monday, April 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 24199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9660]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Staff Attendance at Southwest Power Pool Regional 
Entity Trustee, Regional State Committee and Board of Directors 
Meetings

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby gives notice that 
members of its staff may attend the meetings of the Southwest Power 
Pool, Inc. (SPP) Regional Entity Trustee (RE), Regional State Committee 
(RSC) and Board of Directors, as noted below. Their attendance is part 
of the Commission's ongoing outreach efforts.
    All meetings will be held at the Renaissance Oklahoma City, 10 
North Broadway Avenue, Oklahoma City, OK 73102. The hotel phone number 
is (800) 468-3571.

SPP RE

April 23, 2012 (8 a.m.-12 p.m.)

SPP RSC

April 23, 2012 (1 p.m.-5 p.m.)

SPP Board of Directors

April 24, 2012 (8 a.m.-3 p.m.)

    The discussions may address matters at issue in the following 
proceedings:

Docket No. ER06-451, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER08-1419, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-659, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-1050, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER10-941, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-4105, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-140. Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-430, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-550, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-891, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1017, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1018, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1179, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1401, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1402, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. EL12-2, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. EL12-47, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-3728, Midwest Independent System Operator, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-480, Midwest Independent System Operator, Inc.
Docket No. EL11-34, Midwest Independent System Operator, Inc.

    These meetings are open to the public.
    For more information, contact Patrick Clarey, Office of Energy 
Market Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at (317) 249-
5937 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7909180d0b101a12571a15180b1c00391f1c0b1a571e160f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5f2f3e2b2d363c34713c333e2d3a261f393a2d3c71383029">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: April 16, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9660 Filed 4-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 01, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 01, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0307. JOHN W. LONG v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

01CR16702