alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITIES ECHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the calendar year ended December 31, 2002

Commission file number _____________

BENGUET CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 Metro Manila, Philippines

(Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

3rd Floor, One Corporate Plaza 845 A. Arnaiz Avenue,
Makati City, Philippines
(Address of principal executive offices) Securities
registered or to be registered pursuant to Section
12 (b) of the Act

Title of each class   Common Class B Stock  P3.00 Par Value

Name of each exchange on which registered   National
Association of Securities Dealers
Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (NASD-OCTBB)
Philippine Stock Exchange

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to
Sections 12 (g) of the Act

None (Title of Class)

Securities for which there is a reporting Obligation pursuant
to Section 15(d) of the Act

None (Title of Class)

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of
the issuer's classes of capital or common stock as of
the close of the period covered by the annual report.

Convertible Preferred Class A Stock -219,001 shares
Common Class A Stock -71,642,463* shares
Common Class B Stock -42,470,072* shares

* Net of treasury shares

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (I) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports, and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes _X_  No__

Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the
registrant has elected to follow. Item 17 X    Item 18__.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00314-CR

Patrick Bond

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (1324387D)

April 9, 2015

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 94-41084 Conference Calendar

__________________ LESTER DARGANE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus
ROLLING STONE, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:93-CV-415

- - - - - - - - - - June 28, 1995 Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * IT IS ORDERED that Lester J. Dargane's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, because his appeal lacks arguable merit and is therefore frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED. See5th Cir. R. 42.2. Dargane contends that he is entitled to removal of theNo. 94-41084 -2- sanction on grounds that he did not submit the frivolous § 1983 complaint to the district court for filing. He states that he sent it to Rolling Stone, in an effort to obtain a refund. He asserts that Rolling Stone sent it to the court without his consent. Dargane did not present this contention in his Rule 60(b) motion. This court need not address issues not considered by the district court. "[I]ssues raised for the first time on appeal are not reviewable by this court unless they involve purely legal questions and failure to consider them would result in manifest injustice." Varnado v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). This is an issue of fact, so the court will not address it. This court's review of a ruling on a Rule 60(b) motion is limited to a determination whether the ruling constituted an abuse of discretion. Frazier v. Board of Trustees , 765 F.2d 1278, 1292 (5th Cir. 1985), cert. denied , 476 U.S. 1142 (1986). The court has been "insistent that Rule 60(b) is not a substitute for the ordinary method of redressing judicial error - appeal." Alvestad v. Monsanto Co ., 671 F.2d 908, 912 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 459 U.S. 1070 (1982). Dargane failed to appeal the judgment which contained the sanction order, and he has not presented an adequate argument that the district court abused its discretion. Dargane is admonished that further prosecution of frivolous appeals in this court will result in the imposition of sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 38. "A litigant's pro se status doesNo. 94-41084 -3- not preclude imposition of sanctions." Lyons v. Sheetz , 834 F.2d 493, 496 (5th Cir. 1987). IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kamal Said, Also Known as Kenneth Said, Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621), we conclude that defendant’s conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree is supported by legally sufficient evidence that defendant constructively possessed the cocaine *(see,*Penal Law § 10.00 [8]; *People v Reisman,*29 NY2d 278, *cert denied*405 US 1041; *People v Rodriguez,*104 AD2d 832, 834; *cf., People v Ortiz,*126 AD2d 677, 678, *lv denied*70 NY2d 652).

The prosecutor’s cross-examination of defendant’s son concerning a statement that he allegedly made to police in 1985 about defendant’s prior bad acts was improper. It is well-established that on cross-examination, a witness’s testimony concerning collateral matters may not be contradicted by producing extrinsic evidence for the sole purpose of impeaching the witness’s credibility *(see, People v Schwartzman,*24 NY2d 241, 245, *cert denied*396 US 846; *see also, People v Pavao,*59 NY2d 282, 288-289). In view of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, however, we deem the error harmless because there is no "significant probability” that the jury would have acquitted defendant but for the error *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 241-242).

Defendant’s contention that the court erred by failing to *1011include the "moral certainty” or similar language in its charge on circumstantial evidence has not been preserved for our review because defendant neither requested such a charge nor objected to the court’s charge as given *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). Defendant also failed to preserve for our review his contention that the court’s charge "highlighted” the People’s case in this constructive possession prosecution by failing to object to the charge as given *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). We decline to reach those unpreserved issues in the interest of justice.

Defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct during summation *(see, People v Rubin,*101 AD2d 71, 77; *cf., People v Mott,*94 AD2d 415) or by the People’s failure to produce at trial the cocaine found in defendant’s home *(see,*CPL 240.70 [1]; *People v Martinez,*71 NY2d 937). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J.—Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 4th Degree.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine and Davis, JJ.
**
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Crane Company (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Richard A. Maue, Principal Financial Officer of Crane Holdings, Co., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify to the best of my knowledgethat: 

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Crane Holdings, Co. 

This Certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form10-K and shall not be treated as having been filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 
By /s/ Richard A. MaueRichard A. MaueExecutive Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)March 30, 2023**
#### Gloria Ann PIERCE, Appellant, v. Gary D. PIERCE, Appellee.

No. 51452.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Nov. 28, 1979.

Carl D. Hughes, Oklahoma City, for appellant.

Robert Leyton Wheeler, Inc. by William S. Sanders, Oklahoma City, for appellee.

HODGES, Justice.

This is a petition for certiorari from the Court of Appeals Division # 1. We are granting certiorari for the limited purpose of correction of the Court of Appeals opinion concerning enforcement of the sale of the homestead of the parties by contempt proceedings.

The appellant, Gloria Ann Pierce, was granted a divorce from the appellee, Gary D. Pierce, on the ground of incompatibility. The wife was awarded the custody of the minor children, and the husband was ordered to pay child support at the rate of $150.00 per month per child, and to pay all reasonable hospital, doctor and dental bills of the children. The wife was granted a support alimony judgment in the amount of $36,300.00, payable at the rate of $300.00 per month, which was terminable upon death or remarriage. The trial court made a division of the jointly acquired property except for the homestead, which was ordered sold, with the proceeds, after payment of all costs of repair and sale, to be used for payment of the debts of the parties. The remaining balance was ordered divided 60% to the wife and 40% to the husband.

*733The Court of Appeals remanded this cause to the trial court for enforcement of the trial court’s order to sell the homestead. Its opinion provided “. . . [A]ll of which the trial court may enforce by contempt proceedings if necessary.”- It is contended on certiorari that the Court of Appeals decided a question of substance in a way not in accord with the applicable decisions of this Court.1 We agree.

The portion of the opinion remanding the case to the trial court for enforcement of its order for sale of the homestead through contempt is contrary to the holding in *Hutcheman v. Hutcheman, 557 P.2d 427, 428 (Okl.1976).*In *Hutcheman*this Court held that, although provisions of a decree of divorce concerning alimony for support may be enforced by contempt proceedings, payments in the nature of property settlement may not.

We also add to the Court of Appeals’ opinion that the trial court may order the property sold in such a manner and method as is reasonable and fair to both parties.

CERTIORARI GRANTED FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF CORRECTING THE PORTION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS’ OPINION REGARDING ENFORCEMENT OF SALE OF HOMESTEAD BY CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS. JUDGMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT AND COURT OF APPEALS OTHERWISE AFFIRMED.

LAVENDER, C. J., IRWIN, V. C. J., and WILLIAMS, BARNES, DOOLIN, HAR-GRAVE, and OPALA, JJ., concurring.

SIMMS, J., dissenting.

1

. See 12 O.S.Supp.1976, Ch. 15, App. 3, Rule 3.13.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 159TH DISTRICT COURT OF ANGELINA COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 18th

day of February, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

TENISHA RUTH, Appellant

NO. 12-14-00360-CR; Trial Court No. 2013-0659

By per curiam opinion.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss the appeal 

herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by 

this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and that the 

decision be certified to the court below for observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 7

th day of April, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
EXHIBIT 32



Certification



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,

Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of BNS Co., a Delaware corporation (the Company),
does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                        | 
|Date: February 27, 2004 |  | /s/ Michael Warren     
|                        |  | Michael Warren         
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                        | 
|Date: February 27, 2004 |  | /s/ Michael Warren     
|                        |  | Michael Warren         
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to BNS Co. and will be retained by BNS Co. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
15.3



CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We
consent to the incorporation by reference herein of our report dated January 15, 2024 of Latam Logistic Properties, S.A contained
in Registration Statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-275972). We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Auditors”
and “Statement by Experts” herein.



|/s/
    Deloitte & Touche, S.A. | 
|------------------------------- | 
|                                | 
|San
    Jose, Costa Rica        | 
|March
    29, 2024              |
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 88 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 88

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 8, 2020

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the appointment of Franklin D. Raines as a citizen regent 
        of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the

              

 vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the 
class other than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the 
expiration of the term of John W. McCarter Jr. of Illinois on March 21, 
2020, is filled by the appointment of Franklin D. Raines of Washington, 
DC. The appointment is for a term of six years, beginning the date of 
the enactment of this joint resolution.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 22, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Incorporation by Reference Docket ID No. EPA - HQ - OW - 201 5 - 0499

January 7, 2016 The contents of the following docket s are hereby incorporated by reference into and are considered to be included in, contained in, and to have been placed in Docket No. EPA - H Q - OW 2015 - 0499 ( National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Pesticide General Permit for Point Source Discharges from the Application of Pesticides ): EPA - HQ - OW - 2003 - 0063 ( Interim Statement and Guidance on Application of Pesticides to Waters of the United States in Compliance with FIFRA ), legacy EDOCKET ID No. OW 2003 - 0063. EPA - HQ - OW - 2010 - 0257 ( National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Pesticide General Permit for Point Source Discharges from the Application of Pesticides ) EPA - HQ - OW - 2010 - 0852 (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permits for Point Source Discharges from the Application of Pesticides to Waters of the United States ) EPA - HQ - OW - 2008 - 0719 - 0079 (Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Su bmissions, and Approvals: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permi ts for Point Source Discharges f rom the Application of Pesticides to Waters of the United States) Accessing dockets: All documents in the docket are listed in the www.regulat ions.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in har d copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at a docket facility. The Office of Water (OW) Docket Center is open from 8:30 until 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal ho lidays. The OW Docket Center telephone number is (202) 566

– 2426, and the Docket address is OW Docket, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Frida y, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566

– 1744.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 14–1001

LAW OFFICES OF DAVID EFRON,

Appellant,

v.

MATTHEWS & FULLMER LAW FIRM; CARLOS R. IGUINA-OHARRIZ; 

HATUEY A. INFANTE-CASTELLANOS,

Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on April 1, 2015, is amended

as follows:

On page 4, line 4, the word "undue" is changed to "undo."
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Airbee Wireless, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for
the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I Sundaresan Raja, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of the operations of the Company. /s/ Sundaresan Raja
Sundaresan Raja
Chief Executive Officer September 8, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 26 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 26

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
increase the term of service of Members of the House of Representatives 
                        from 2 years to 4 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2019

Mr. Marino submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
increase the term of service of Members of the House of Representatives 
                        from 2 years to 4 years.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The House of Representatives shall be composed of 
Members chosen every fourth year by the people of the several States, 
and the Electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite 
for Electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislature.
    ``Section 2. This article shall first apply to the first regularly 
scheduled general election of Representatives which occurs after 
ratification during a year in which there is no election for President 
and Vice President.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-269698) pertaining to the Mineralys Therapeutics, Inc. 2020 Equity Incentive Plan, the Mineralys Therapeutics, Inc. 2023 Incentive Award Plan, and the Mineralys Therapeutics, Inc. 2023 Employee Stock Purchase Plan  of our report dated March 15, 2023, with respect to the financial statements of Mineralys Therapeutics, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2022.





/s/ Ernst & Young LLP





Denver, Colorado


March 15, 2023