MARK WHITE Attorney General 

# The Attorney General of Texas
July 8, 1980

Honorable Gerald R.Brown Executive Director Texas Industrial Commission Box12728,Capitol Station Austin, Texas 787ll Opinion No. NW206

Re: Texas Industrial Commission Economic Development Fund

Dear Mr.Brown:

You inform us that the Texas Industrial Commission (TIC) is considering establlshirg an Economic Development Fund for the purpose of receiving and expendirg private contributions. The TIC would use the contributions to pay travel, entertainment, and other expenses necessary for activities designed to attract business and industry to Texas. Article 5190l/2, V.T.C.S., reads inpertinent part:

(a) Additional &ties of the Commission in addition to its other duties, the State Industrial Commission is hereby authorized to plan, organize and operate a program for attracting and locating
new industries inthe State ofTexas. (b) The Industrial Commission may accept contributions from private sources, all of which may be deposited in a bank or banks to be used at the discretion of the Commission in compliance with the wishes ofthe donors.

Youfirst ask whether the commission may depceit funds donated from private sources in banks, rather than the state treasury, and expend them without specific legislative appropriation. Article 5190l/2, V.T.C.S., clearly authorizes the commission to deposit such funds in banks! rather than the state treasury, and to spend them without specific legislative eppropriation. See generally Letter Advisory No. 132(1977). However, the legislature has authority to appropriate such funds even though they are held outside ofthe treasury. See Attorney General Opinion H-1167(1978);Letter Advisory No. 132(1977).x also General Appropriations Act, Acts 1979,66th Leg., ch. 843, art. V,SS18,19at 2911.

You next ask under what conditions, if any, such funds may be expended for travel and entertainment in attempting to attract business and industry to Texas. The contributions accepted by the Commission pursuant

P. 663Honorable Gerald R.Brown - Page Two (MW-2 061

to article 5190 l/2, V.T.C.S., are public funds. Attorney General Opinion WW-534 (1958). Thev mav not. therefore. be soent in a manner inconsistent with article III. section 51 ‘bfthe Texas Constitution- which orohibits individual, assoc: gratuitous &nations to eny

iation of individuals or corporation. Road District No. 4, Shelby County v.~

Allred, 68S.W.2d 164(Tex. 1934). There must be en adequate return to the state, either in the accomplishment of apublic purpose or in the receipt of something equivalent in value. See State v. City of Dallas, 319S.W. 2d767 (Tex. Civ. App.- Austin 1958)aff’d 331ST. 2d737 (Tex. 1960);Attorney General Opinion H-416(1974).
However, an expenditure for alegitimate public purpose isnot rendered unlawful because a privately owned business may be benefited thereby. Barrington v. Cokinos, 338 S.W. 2d 133 (Tex. 1960). The Texas courts have held permissible municipal expenditures designed to advertise and promote the growth of a city. Bland v.Cit of Taylor, 37S.W. 2d 291(Tex. Civ. App.-Austin 1931)aff’d Davis v. Clt o Ta lor, 67 .w S.W. 2d 1033(Tex. 1934). Private citizens may be provided transportation at public expense, where there is an official business purpose for doing so. Attorney General Opinion H-1089(1977). InAttorney General Opinion G-4167(1941),this office approved certain expenditures for public relations which the University of Texas made. One expense account included an item for the “cultivation of officiaLs of Rockefeller Foundation and General Education Board.” Presumably, this item covered the entertainment of private individuals. Thus, there is authority for the use of public funds to provide travel and entertainment to private individuals, and for the use of public funds to encourage local development. Attorney General Opinion G-4167(1941) developed a test designed to show whether expenses were incurred for state business, defined asfollows:

‘State business’ signifies the accomplishment of a governmental function; it requires that the means and method adopted be reasonably necessary; it implies that the particular governmental function involved be one directly entrusted to the institution or department assuming its accomplishment.

Article 5190l/2, V.T.C.S., describes a governmental function which is entrusted to the Commission. See Tex. Const. art. XVIS56;Bland v.City ofTaylor, slqra. The Commission may mxnated funds for travel and entertainment where reasonably necessary to the attainment of the purposes set out in article 5190 l/2. The reasonableness of aparticular expenditure isfor the Commission to decide inthe first instance. See Attorney General Opinion H-1260(1978).

- Youinform usthat some ofthe private funds donated will very likely come from individals and entities interested in the issuance of revenue bonds under the Development Corporation Act of 1979. That Act vests inthe TICthe responsibility for approving certain leases, sales and loan agreements in conjunction with the issuance of such bonds, as well as the bonds themselves. Youask whether the statutory provisions dealing with gifts to public servants end official misconduct preclude donations to the fund, if established, from such persons. Donations under article 5190l/2, V.T.C.S., are not made to individual commissioners. However, under certain circumstances it is

P. 664- ,

Honorable Gerald R.Brown - Page Three (NW-206)

conceivable that conditions attached to them could cause them to benefit the commissioners. Article 6252-9b, V.T.C.S., provides insection 8(a)asfollows:

No state officer or state employee should accept or solicit any gift, favor, or service that might reasonably tend to influence him in the discharge of his official duties or that he knows or should know is being offered him with the intent to influence hisofficial conduct.

Whether any particular donation would cause a violation of this provision is a fact question for the commission to resolve in the first instance. See Attorney General opinions H-1223 (1978);H-688 (1975). See also Meyers v. Walker-76 S.W. 305 (Tex. Civ. App.-Eastland 1925,no writ).

SUMMARY

The Texas Industrial Commission may deposit in banks funds donated from private sources under article 5190 l/2, V.T.C.S. Such funds may be spent for travel and entertainment in attempting to attract business and industry to Texas where reasonably necessary to that purpose. Whether donations from individuals interested inthe issuance ofrevenue bonds under the Development Corporation Act of 1979 would Involve the commission inviolations of the state ethics law would depend onthe facts ofeach case.

verYm~r

MARK WHITE Attorney General ofTexas

JOHN W.FAINTER, JR. First Assistant Attorney General

TEDL.HARTLEY Executive Assistant Attorney General Prepared bySusan Garrison Assistant Attorney General

APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE

C.Robert Heath, Chairman Jon Bible Susan Garrison Rick Gilpin Iris Jones

P. 665