alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R.
Clay Hulette, the Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/R. Clay HuletteR.
      Clay HuletteVice
      President and Chief Financial OfficerFebruary
      16, 2009
Customer Service Hotline: 1

- 800

- 438

- 2474 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

- 2029

September 21, 2015

The Honorable John Quigley

Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

Rachel Carson State Office Building

P.O. Box 2063

Harrisburg, PA 17105

- 2063

Dear Secretary Quigley:

On September 9, 2015 , the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a

revision to the Allegheny County portion of the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP)

from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection . This SIP revision pertains to

the revision by Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD) of an existing regulation for

fiberglass boat manufacturing materials. The regulation was revised to in clude the previously

omitted Table 2105.86, titled “Monomer VOC Content Limitations for Open Molding Resin and

Gel Coat Operations. ” This SIP revision is a supplement to the November 15, 2013 SIP revision

concerning adoption of control techniques guidelin es for four industry categories. EPA has

determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to

prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Irene

Shandruk , Office of Air Program Planning, at (215) 814

- 2 166 . She is the principal contact for

this rulemaking.

Sincerely,

/s/

D iana Esher , Director

Air Protection Division

cc: Joyce E. Epps, Director, PADEP

Jayme Graham, Manager

, ACHD
Fiscal Year 2019

FGIS User Fee Accounts

Revenue Obligations Earnings / Loss Operating 

Reserve

U.S. Grain Standards Act

Inspection & Weighing $31,892,137 $37,910,189 -$6,018,052 $15,543,893

Official Agencies $0

1 $1,550,946 -$1,550,946 $3,533,300

Agricultural Marketing Act

Rice $5,301,966 $5,469,426 -$167,460 $9,309,434

Commodities $2,140,863 $2,616,217 -$475,354 -$532,861

Fiscal Year 2019 Total $39,334,966 $47,546,778 -$8,211,812 $27,853,766

1Suspended the assessment of fees [7CFR800.71(a)(2)] for supervision of official inspection 

and weighing services performed by delegated States and/or designated agencies
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 10, 2015

s0407

Order 

Clerk

April 10, 2015

150548

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150548

COA: 323643

Kent CC: 14-003215-FH

TODD RANDOLPH VAN DOORNE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 15, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration

as on leave granted. On remand, the Court of Appeals shall address whether the “knock 

and talk” procedure conducted in this case is consistent with US Const, Am IV, as 

articulated in Florida v Jardines, 133 S Ct 1409 (2013). We note that a similar issue is 

presented in People v Frederick (Docket No. 150546), which we remanded to the Court of 

Appeals for consideration as on leave granted by order dated April 10, 2015.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-276729) pertaining to the CG Oncology, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, CG Oncology, Inc. 2022 Equity Incentive Plan, CG Oncology, Inc. 2024 Equity Incentive Plan, and the CG Oncology, Inc. 2024 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of CG Oncology, Inc. of our report dated March 26, 2024, with respect to the financial statements of CG Oncology, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of CG Oncology, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2023.

|                           |        |        |        |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |   |   |   |
|                           |        |        |   |
| Irvine, California        |        |        |        |
| March 26, 2024            |        |        |        |

 

 

----
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Neenah Paper, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

 

(1)               The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
|   | /s/ Sean T. Erwin                                             |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Sean T. Erwin                                                 |
|   | Chairman of the Board,  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (Principal Executive  Officer)                                |
|   | Date: November 5, 2010                                   |
|   |                                                          |
|   | /s/ Bonnie C. Lind                                            |
|   | Bonnie C. Lind                                                |
|   | Senior Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|   | (Principal Financial  Officer)                                |
|   | Date: November 5, 2010                                   |

 

----
GARRY ROLLINS,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON 

OFFENDER REVIEW,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3461

Opinion filed April 9, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.

Garry Rollins, pro se, Petitioner.

Sarah Rumph, General Counsel, and Mark J. Hiers, Assistant General Counsel, Florida 

Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

ROBERTS, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 225A14

FILED 10 April 2015

WALLACE SCOTT KIKER

v.

CEDRIC JELANI WINFIELD

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of 

the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 759 S.E.2d 372 (2014), vacating and 

remanding an order entered on 18 November 2013 by Judge James M. Webb in 

Superior Court, Harnett County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 17 March 2015.

Bain, Buzzard & McRae, LLP, by Robert A. Buzzard and Elisa B. Jernigan, for 

plaintiff-appellant.

Law Offices of Robert E. Ruegger, by Robert E. Ruegger, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
y\ar6^ 27/^/5"

No. Jlow -e^*3z^EA -vtf \

Gae.€\wil440rj&r Ct$^A^4i^ j^&u&s <%*<£ ^ ordered

.RECEIVED .IN

courtof criminalappeal

APR 0« 2015

Abe!Aeosta,Clerk

4'

Wg4~fFJfr^$ Cerfvi &fe4oa/fc£r^y ^3,-ZoiS

nolwrf,K~M£ci%j&lk*jree<M£lfo -fa P) /e

£*&c& no-h 5?*+ -U youfm$e. <&?/»-/?*/ +**l gfe,~i<L.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 109 

To prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from granting a work authorization to an alien found to have been unlawfully present in the United 

States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. BURGESS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from granting a work authorization to an alien found to have been 

unlawfully present in the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal Protection for 

5 American Workers Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN WORK AUTHORIZA7 TIONS. 

8 Effective beginning on the date of the enactment of 

9 this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security is prohibited 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 109 IH

1 from granting a work authorization to an alien who has 

2 been finally determined, in a valid immigration proceeding 

3 during which due process was afforded, to have been at 

4 any time unlawfully present in the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
ACCEPTED12-14-00309-CRTWELFTH COURT OF APPEALSTYLER, TEXAS4/13/2015 9:23:58 AMCATHY LUSKCLERK
# C_2004106EN.01002601.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/26

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Bundesverwaltungsgericht by order of 17 December 2003 in the case of Dr Karl Robert Kranemann against Land Nordrhein-Westfalen

(Case C-109/04)

(2004/C 106/45)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Bundesverwaltungsgericht of 17 December 2003, received at the Court Registry on 2 March 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Dr Karl Robert Kranemann against Land Nordrhein-Westfalen on the following question:

Is a national legal provision under which a trainee lawyer who completes part of his prescribed training at a place of his choosing in another Member State is entitled to reimbursement of travelling expenses only to the amount incurred for the domestic stretch of the journey compatible with Article 39 EC?

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 3, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132273 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. _________________________________________ Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

IN RE JACOB BENJAMIN JACKSON and 

SAMANTHA MARIN JACKSON, Minors. 

_________________________________________ 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, f/k/a 

FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 132273 

 COA: 267963

 Oakland CC

TRACI BETH JACKSON,

Respondent-Appellant, 

 Family Division: 04-693264-NA 

and 

PAUL D. JACKSON,

Respondent. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 21, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s1031 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 3, 2006 

Clerk
AVS

Quality Management

System

Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with S8

QPM#

AIR-ANM-lI30-F7

Date: December 17. 2008

Revision

1

Record of Contacts

FDMS Docket No. FAA~() ?_. _' :1_1 _

With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

,

. -.c;·;' ... ~{jTganization 'C,... ' ,""- '. " r~,(sonCOlitat'tel't,_. !,late ..

ATA Joe White 10/13/09

UNCONTROLLED COpy WHEN DOWNLOADED

Check the Master List to Verify That This Is the Correct Revision Before Use
IN THE MATTER OF * IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

THE APPLICATION FOR * OF MARYLAND

RESIGNATION OF * Misc. Docket AG No. 18

SCOTT GREGORY ADAMS * September Term, 2019

ORDER

UPON CONSIDERATION of the Application to Resign from the Practice of Law 

of Scott Gregory Adams and the response of Bar Counsel thereto, it is this 4th day of 

September, 2019;

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the resignation of Scott 

Gregory Adams from the Bar of the State of Maryland is hereby accepted; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name Scott Gregory 

Adams from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of 

the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals 

in this State.

/s/ Robert N. McDonald

Senior Judge
From: William Charmley/AA/USEPA/US

To: "Achanta, Chandana L." <Chandana_L._Achanta@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: rebecca.yoon@dot.gov, james.tamm@dot.gov, Steve.Wood@dot.gov, Maureen 

Delaney/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Robin Moran/AA/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 09/30/2010 02:41 PM

Subject:Revised LD NOI and TAR responding to all outstanding interagency comments

Chandana -

The attached are redline/strikeout compared to last night's versions which Jim Tamm sent you.

With these documents EPA and NHTSA have responded to all outstanding interagency comments.

Please let us know ASAP if these are okay, and both agencies will load into ROCIS clean copies.

Please give Jim or I a call if there are any issues.

thanks

Bill
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         2099876
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 18081949
<ALLOWANCES>                                    244866
<INVENTORY>                                   13779015
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              37406895
<PP&E>                                        62522232
<DEPRECIATION>                                35634924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                68786738
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         15036140
<BONDS>                                       15000000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       1102580
<OTHER-SE>                                    20711516
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  68786738
<SALES>                                      122358592
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             122358592
<CGS>                                         64006688
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                115388160
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1452177
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                128006
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1194986
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5618521
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2592935
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2925320
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2925320
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     8.11


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Curtis Akey, certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MPC Corporation;

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             Theregistrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designated under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Omitted;

 

(c) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(d) Disclosed inthis report any changes in the registrants’ internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrants’ most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrants’ fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrants’ internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             Theregistrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to theregistrants’ auditors and the audit committee of the registrants’ board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrants’ ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrants’ internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
|              | By:    | /s/ Curtis M. Akey                           |
|-------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
| November 14, 2007 |   | Curtis M. Akey                               |
|              |   | Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 29 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 29

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   limit the number of terms an individual may serve as a Member of 
                               Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 15, 2019

    Mr. Holding submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   limit the number of terms an individual may serve as a Member of 
                               Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No person shall serve as a Representative for more 
than six two-year terms. Service as a Representative for more than one 
year of any two-year term shall be treated as a complete term for 
purposes of this section, without regard to whether the service was 
completed by the individual originally elected to the term.
    ``Section 2. No person shall serve as a Senator for more than two 
six-year terms. Service as a Senator for more than three years of any 
six-year term shall be treated as a complete term for purposes of this 
section, without regard to whether the service was completed by the 
individual originally elected to the term.
    ``Section 3. No term beginning before the date of the ratification 
of this article shall be taken into account in determining eligibility 
for election or appointment under this article.''.
                                 <all>
```