alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 60 

Designating May 5, 2017, as the ‘‘National Day of Awareness for Missing 

and Murdered Native Women and Girls’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2017 

Mr. DAINES (for himself, Mr. TESTER, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. GARDNER, Mr. 

FRANKEN, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. UDALL, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. HATCH, Mrs. 

GILLIBRAND, Mr. ROUNDS, and Ms. HEITKAMP) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

MAY 3, 2017 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating May 5, 2017, as the ‘‘National Day of Awareness for Missing and Murdered Native Women and 

Girls’’. 

Whereas, according to a study commissioned by the Department of Justice, in some tribal communities, American 

Indian women face murder rates that are more than 10 

times the national average murder rate; 

Whereas, according to the Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention, homicide was the third leading cause of death 

among American Indian and Alaska Native women between 10 and 24 years of age and the fifth leading cause 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 60 ATS 

of death for American Indian and Alaska Native women 

between 25 and 34 years of age; 

Whereas little data exist on the number of missing American 

Indian and Alaska Native women in the United States; 

Whereas, on July 5, 2013, Hanna Harris, a member of the 

Northern Cheyenne Tribe, was reported missing by her 

family in Lame Deer, Montana; 

Whereas the body of Hanna Harris was found 5 days after 

she went missing; 

Whereas Hanna Harris was determined to have been raped 

and murdered, and the individuals accused of committing 

those crimes were convicted; 

Whereas the case of Hanna Harris is an example of many 

similar cases; and 

Whereas Hanna Harris was born on May 5, 1992: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates May 5, 2017, as the ‘‘National 

3 Day of Awareness for Missing and Murdered Native 

4 Women and Girls’’; and 

5 (2) calls on the people of the United States and 

6 interested groups— 

7 (A) to commemorate the lives of missing 

8 and murdered American Indian and Alaska Na9 tive women whose cases are documented and 

10 undocumented in public records and the media; 

11 and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 60 ATS 

1 (B) to demonstrate solidarity with the fam2 ilies of victims in light of those tragedies. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 87 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.87

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twenty

                            Joint Resolution

 
Providing for the reappointment of Michael M. Lynton as a citizen regent 
         of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Michael M. Lynton of California 
is filled by the reappointment of the incumbent. The reappointment is 
for a term of 6 years, beginning on the later of September 29, 2020, or 
the date of the enactment of this joint resolution.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

THOMAS A. JEFFREY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 395 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of November, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**SENECA GAMING CORPORATIONCERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE OFFICERS**

 

(Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Seneca Gaming Corporation, or SGC, on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission, we, Catherine Walker, Chief Operating Officer(principal executive officer), and David Sheridan, Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.                                      The QuarterlyReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,; and

 

2.                                      The informationcontained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operation of SGC as of, and for, theperiods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to SGC and will be retained by SGC and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its Staff upon request.

 

August 14, 2009

 
| /s/ Catherine Walker           |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Catherine Walker               |   |
| Chief Operating Officer        |   |
| (Principal Executive  Officer) |   |
|                           |   |
|                           |   |
| /s/ David Sheridan             |   |
| David Sheridan                 |   |
| Chief Financial Officer        |   |
| (Principal Financial  Officer) |   |

 

 

Theforgoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Qpursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated byreference into any filing of SGC, whether made before or after the date hereof,regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
1517 WEST FRONT STREET  SUITE 354  TYLER, TX 75702  TEL: 903-593-8471  FAX: 903-593-2193

Serving Anderson, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith, Trinity, Upshur, Van 

Zandt and Wood Counties

www.12thcoa.courts.state.tx.us

CHIEF JUSTICE

JAMES T. WORTHEN

JUSTICES

BRIAN HOYLE

GREG NEELEY

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

CLERK

CATHY S. LUSK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

MARGARET HUSSEY

April 9, 2015

Ms. Lois Rogers

District Clerk, Smith County

Courthouse, Suite 204

100 North Broadway Avenue

Tyler, TX 75702-7201

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 12-15-00034-CR, 12-15-00035-CR, 

12-15-00036-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 241-2620-06-A, 241-2621-06-A, 241-2622-06-A

Style: Donald Lee Gray

v.

The State of Texas

Pursuant to Rule 18.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, enclosed herewith is the 

Mandate issued in the above causes. When the District or County Clerk has executed the 

Mandate in accordance with the opinion of this Court, the Clerk is requested to fill in the 

information below and to return the attached copy to this office.

Very truly yours,

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:_____________________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

CC: Mr. James W. Volberding (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Michael J. West (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mandate executed on __10th day of __APRIL______________, 2015.

Brief explanation of action taken: ____SCANNNED____________________________________

___________LINDA RHYMES____________________________________District/County Clerk

FILE COPY FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 4/10/2015 10:59:49 AM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Steven DeWayne Pruitt, Appellant

No. 06-14-00058-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 8th District Court of 

Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

1323371). Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss 

and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Steven DeWayne Pruitt, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED APRIL 8, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 72 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 72

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue 
  Service, Department of the Treasury, relating to ``Contributions in 
               Exchange for State or Local Tax Credits''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 16, 2019

 Ms. Sherrill (for herself, Mr. Gottheimer, Ms. Underwood, Mr. King of 
New York, Ms. Hill of California, Mr. Casten of Illinois, Mr. Cisneros, 
Mr. Phillips, Ms. Porter, Ms. Wild, Ms. Houlahan, Mr. Panetta, Mr. Rose 
 of New York, Mr. Malinowski, Mr. Van Drew, Mr. Suozzi, Mr. Pascrell, 
 Mr. Pallone, Mr. Norcross, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, Mr. Blumenauer, 
Mr. Higgins of New York, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Courtney, 
 Mrs. Hayes, Mr. Trone, Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania, Mr. Kim, 
  Mr. Sires, Ms. Judy Chu of California, Ms. DelBene, Mr. Payne, Ms. 
  Norton, Mr. Rush, Mr. Ruppersberger, Mr. Levin of California, Mrs. 
Napolitano, Mrs. Trahan, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Himes, 
Ms. Eshoo, Mrs. Lowey, Mr. Rouda, Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York, 
Ms. Waters, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Mr. Michael F. Doyle of Pennsylvania, 
     and Mr. Ted Lieu of California) submitted the following joint 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
   United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue 
  Service, Department of the Treasury, relating to ``Contributions in 
               Exchange for State or Local Tax Credits''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service, Department of the 
Treasury, relating to ``Contributions in Exchange for State or Local 
Tax Credits'' (84 Fed. Reg. 27513 (June 13, 2019)), and such rule shall 
have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
| 1. | I am a duly authorized officer of BMW Financial Services NA, LLC; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | I have reviewed the terms of that certain Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 30, 1995 (the “Basic Servicing Agreement”), between Financial Services Vehicle Trust (the “Trust”) and BMW Financial              Services NA, LLC, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”), as supplemented by the 2023-1 Servicing Supplement, dated as of February 15, 2023 (together with the Basic Servicing Agreement, the “Servicing Agreement”), among the Trust, BMW              Manufacturing L.P., as grantor and initial beneficiary of the Trust, and BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, as sponsor and as Servicer, and I have made, or have caused to be made under my supervision, a review of the activities of the Servicer              and the performance of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement during the period from February 15, 2023 to December 31, 2023; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 3. | to the best of my knowledge, based on the review described in paragraph 2 above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects during the period from                February 15, 2023 to December 31, 2023. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 76 (Thursday, April 19, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 23432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9401]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MB Docket No. 08-150; RM-11390; DA 12-512]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Asbury and Maquoketa, IA, and 
Mineral Point, WI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Audio Division dismisses the petition for rule making 
filed by KM Radio of Independence, LLC, proposing the allotment of 
Channel 238A at Mineral Point, Wisconsin, and the substitution of 
reserved Channel *254A for reserved vacant Channel *238A at Asbury, 
Iowa, 73 FR 50,297, and terminates the proceeding.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Dupont, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MB Docket No. 08-150, adopted April 2, 2012, and 
released April 2, 2012. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW., Room CY-
A257, Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision also may 
be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy 
and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 
20554, (800) 378-3160, or via the company's Web site, www.bcpiweb.com. 
The Report and Order is not subject to the Congressional Review Act, 
and therefore the Commission will not send a copy of it in a report to 
be sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office, see 
U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

Federal Communications Commission.
Nazifa Sawez,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2012-9401 Filed 4-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**C2
      GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES INC.**





**OFFICER’S
      CERTIFICATION**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. 1350)**








The
      undersigned Stephen A. Weintraub, duly appointed and incumbent officer of C2
      Global Technologies Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Corporation”), in
      connection with the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual
      period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), does hereby represent, warrant and
      certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended,
      that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.  The
      Report is in full compliance with reporting requirements of Section 13(a) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Corporation.





March
      16,
      2007


/s/
                Stephen A. WeintraubStephen
                A. WeintraubExecutive
                Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate
                Secretary
[SAMPLE]

Dear PAAT Program Director:

This letter invites you to apply for your grant award for the Protection and Advocacy for 

Assistive Technology (PAAT) program, as required by Section 5 of the Assistive Technology

Act of 1998, as amended, and the general requirements for all written requests for funding, 

pursuant to the Education Department General Administrative Regulations (34 CFR Part 76). 

This package consists of the PAAT Assurances and the Certification Regarding Lobbying (Form 

ED 80-0013). When submitted, these materials will constitute your request for PAAT funds for 

fiscal year (FY) [XXXX], and all subsequent fiscal years, until such time as the Protection and 

Advocacy system in your State may be redesignated.

To receive PAAT program funds, please do the following:

1. provide all requested information;

2. sign and date the forms as indicated; and

3. submit the original and one copy of the entire application package to the 

Commissioner of RSA.

To ensure timely review and approval, please submit your application to RSA no later 

than[month/day/year], so that RSA can distribute the FY [XXXX] PAAT funds as soon as they

become available. As these materials contain no confidential information, these application 

materials will become part of RSA’s public records once submitted and approved in accordance 

with the regulations promulgated under the Paperwork Reduction Act (5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3)(v)).

We appreciate your commitment to serving individuals with disabilities and meeting the goals of 

the PAAT program. Please do not hesitate to contact RSA if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Lynnae M. Ruttledge

Commissioner

Enclosures
# Exhibit 32

Section 1350
Certifications

---

# Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of CommunitySouth Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company), each certify that, to his knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed
          with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  August 10, 2005 |  | By:   /s/  C. Allan Ducker, III
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|                       |  | C. Allan Ducker, III           
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer        

|Date:  August 10, 2005 |  | By:   /s/  John W. Hobbs
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------
|                       |  | John W. Hobbs           
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer
-1- 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

COURT OF APPEALS 

KENNETH KLIMEK, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

UNPUBLISHED 

April 7, 2015 

v No. 318504 

Oakland Circuit Court 

MS PLAZA, LLC, and PRIME PROPERTY 

ASSOCIATES, INC., 

LC No. 2012-130756-NO 

 Defendants-Appellees. 

Before: BECKERING, P.J., and JANSEN and BOONSTRA, JJ. 

JANSEN, J. (dissenting). 

 In my opinion, a reasonable person in plaintiff’s position would not have anticipated that 

the rubberized floor mat would slip out from under him as he stepped onto it to approach the 

urinal. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent. 

 The fact that defendant had seen the rubberized floor mat shift slightly on previous 

occasions is of little importance in this case. After all, the purpose of the rubberized mat was to 

reduce the slipperiness of defendants’ floor, and any reasonable user of defendants’ bathroom 

facilities would have expected it to fulfill this function. 

 Plaintiff’s expert, Steven Ziemba, averred in his affidavit that defendants owed a duty to 

place the edge of the rubberized mat against the wall, and should have secured the mat to the 

floor with tape or Velcro. Defendants did neither of these things, instead placing the edge of the 

mat underneath the urinal and away from the wall, thereby permitting it to slide forward when 

plaintiff stepped up to the urinal. Ziemba also averred that the manufacturer’s instructions 

recommended placement of the mat firmly against the wall; and an instructional video suggested 

the attachment of Velcro tabs for additional stability. I acknowledge that maintenance employee 

Peter Meldrum testified that the manufacturer’s instructions only specified that the mat should be 

placed on a dry, clean surface. However, I believe that Ziemba’s affidavit was sufficient to 

create a genuine issue of material fact concerning whether the mat was properly installed. Of 

note, neither defendant nor any other layperson untrained in slipping hazards could have been 

expected to know that the mat should be installed flush against the wall. 

 An average person would not have recognized upon casual inspection that the rubberized 

floor mat would slip out from under him as he stepped up to the urinal. Cf. Kennedy v Great 

Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co, 274 Mich App 710, 713-714; 737 NW2d 179 (2007). I therefore 
-2- 

conclude that the circuit court erred by granting summary disposition in favor of defendants on 

the ground that the hazard posed by the mat was open and obvious. I would reverse. 

/s/ Kathleen Jansen
391 A.2d 683

#### Commonwealth v. Hickenbottom, Appellant.

Submitted March 20, 1978.

Edward F. Kane, for appellant; Eric J. Cox, Assistant District Attorney, and William T. Nicholas, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

HOFFMAN and PRICE, JJ., dissented and would hold the extension of time to have been improperly granted.