alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,Leslie A. Blodgett , Chief Executive Officer, and I, Myles B. McCormick, ChiefFinancial Officer, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of Bare Escentuals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended March 30, 2008, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Date: May 9, 2008 |   |                                                                            |
|------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   |                                                                            |
|                   | By:    | /s/ LESLIE A. BLODGETT                                                          |
|                   |   | Leslie A. Blodgett                                                              |
|                   |   | Chief Executive Officer  and Director                                           |
|                   | By:    | /s/ MYLES B. MCCORMICK                                                          |
|                   |   | Myles B. McCormick                                                              |
|                   |   | Executive Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer and  Chief Operating Officer |

 

The foregoing certification is beingfurnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filedas part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 10 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to prohibit 

Members of Congress from receiving compensation during a fiscal year 

unless both Houses of Congress have agreed to a concurrent resolution 

on the budget for that fiscal year prior to the beginning of that fiscal 

year. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. FITZPATRICK (for himself and Mr. GALLAGHER) submitted the following 

joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to prohibit Members of Congress from receiving 

compensation during a fiscal year unless both Houses 

of Congress have agreed to a concurrent resolution on 

the budget for that fiscal year prior to the beginning 

of that fiscal year. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 10 IH 

1 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

2 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

3 for ratification: 

4 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

5 ‘‘SECTION 1. A Member of Congress may not receive 

6 a compensation for service as a Member of Congress dur7 ing a fiscal year unless both Houses of Congress have 

8 agreed to an identical concurrent resolution on the budget 

9 for that fiscal year prior to the beginning of that fiscal 

10 year. 

11 ‘‘SECTION 2. This article shall apply with respect to 

12 fiscal years which begin after this article becomes a valid 

13 part of the Constitution.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
J-S04013-15

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Appellant

v.

DARRYL GREGORY STEWART,

 Appellee

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 840 MDA 2014

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence April 14, 2014,

in the Court of Common Pleas of York County, 

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-67-CR-0004973-2013

BEFORE: BOWES, ALLEN, and STRASSBURGER,* JJ.

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY STRASSBURGER, J.: FILED APRIL 07, 2015

I concur in the result. I write separately to stress that, as the author 

of the Musau opinion, I remain of the view that the issue resolved therein 

was properly decided. 

Judge Bowes and Judge Allen Do Not Join
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: 

Federal Maritime Commission.

# TIME AND DATE: 

April 18, 2012—10 a.m.

# PLACE: 

800 North Capitol Street NW., First Floor Hearing Room, Washington, DC. 

# STATUS:

A part of the meeting will be in Open Session and the remainder of the meeting will be in Closed Session.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

      ( print page 22318)    

## Open Session

1. Staff Briefing on Economic and Trade Conditions.

                    2. FMC Docket No. 11-22,                     *Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier Negotiated Rate Arrangements; Tariff Filing Exemption—NOTICE OF INQUIRY*                    —Staff Briefing and Status Report, and Commission Discussion regarding NVOCC Negotiated Rate Arrangements (NRAs) and NVOCC Service Arrangements (NSAs) (46 CFR part 531).                

                    3. Staff Briefing on Administrative Conference of the United States, Recommendation No. 2011-6,                     *International Regulatory Cooperation.*

## Closed Session

1. September 2, 2011 Commission Order Amending Special Reporting Requirements for the Transpacific Stabilization Agreement and the Westbound Transpacific Stabilization Agreement.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, (202) 523-5725.

Rachel E. Dickon,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-9098 Filed 4-11-12; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAMES MCCAFFREY and LISA MCCAFFREY,

Appellants,

v.

RYAN WEAVER, et al.,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1088

[April 14, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Scott R. Kerner, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2016-CA-007110-

XXXX-MB.

Stephen E. Walker, Jupiter, for appellants.

Michael A. Rosenberg, Daniel E. Levin, and Adrianna de la Cruz-Muñoz

of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Plantation, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, GERBER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 14-0866

Filed April 8, 2015

PHILIP AMOR and BRITTANY AMOR,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

vs.

BRADFORD HOUSER, RIVER RIDGE

PLACE, LLC and HOUSER

ENTERPRISES, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Mitchell E. 

Turner, Judge. 

A landlord appeals the district court order approving the tenants’ motion 

for class certification. AFFIRMED.

Richard L. Fehseke III of Fehseke & Gray Law Offices, Fort Madison, for 

appellants.

Christopher S. Warnock and Christine Boyer of Iowa Tenants’ Project, 

Iowa City, for appellees.

Considered by Danilson, C.J., and Doyle and Tabor, JJ.
2

TABOR, J.

River Ridge Place, LLC, Houser Enterprises, Inc., and Bradford Houser 

appeal an order by the district court granting a motion by tenants Philip and 

Brittany Amor to certify a class action under Iowa Rules of Civil Procedure 1.261, 

1.262, and 1.263. The Amors point out that we rejected a very similar challenge 

in Staley v. Barkalow, No. 12-1031, 2013 WL 2368825, at *8 (Iowa Ct. App. May 

30, 2013) (holding tenants may show harm from a landlord’s willful and knowing 

inclusion of illegal lease provisions even without enforcement by the landlord). 

Finding the district court correctly certified the class based on our analysis in 

Staley, we affirm without opinion under Iowa Rule of Appellate Procedure 

6.1203(a) and (d).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R.
Clay Hulette, the Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/R. Clay HuletteR.
      Clay HuletteVice President and Chief Financial
  OfficerFebruary
      12, 2010
Kb beA l&vlin Ctoi-iltJLi

Am* io IU"R. n^n ,_ TM»«•

1ST COURTOF APPEALS

HOUSTON. TEXAS

APR-7 2015

CHRISTOPHER A PRINE

March £& QC>)^ CLER

Ol _ 05"-^o3"96-^^

PkaAf briA^ -Ik 4-kf. "RrU /!ou*4 G-D AfPfiCuU AlJthfeh 4h*i

lT\l«e irf>n4 \r\ a M^lfc*\ Xrs hrr-fi&V 6? ^u^SriLiKieiv-d. 4d 4U&. \1l^

X u^n^U IJ^-U kWo lP4U;^ CfXj/vJ aauJti (Lh+iLk a»J

ike ^ervC'V^^M^H^e^ ^ 4U* Makers In /W^l *C Xu*]*^;

/ hank l&U for Mou rHTlA*. end AsS\sXont4L Hi

wS X lo\\I h-c hiin a m.W kJoliciL aP Ap/VxJ fno/sn CO .. CD <->

fXJr_S \ruJi,

Ll\
Amciri il/^,Ty.rmi/\r1

,$$Aft»3&&£> TX

•-•: ::.:.:• .:•:'; •'--.£ >U\ £ |

LtbAL .cur4 Cit Appteohi PpU fti^nc+

' f :-:_"_'^:j:-.:i:_'C:!

jiiiii|ii|i|jiijliiijijliiijjJijlln||jinjljjiiiii|jn|iilj|lil
## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL A PPE ALS
OF TEXAS

N O S

. P D

- 1 3 5 8

- 1 5 , 1 3 5 9

- 1 5 , 1 3 6 0

- 1 5 , 1 3 6 1

- 1 5

E R I C L

. B A U M G A R T , A p p e l l a n t

v
.

T H E S T A T E O F T E X A S , A p p e l l e e

O N A P P E L L A N T ’ S P E T I T I O N F O R D I S C R E T I O N A R Y R E V I E W
F R O M T H E F O U R T E E N T H C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

H A R R I S C O U N T Y

P e r C u r i a m
.

O R D E R

T h e C o u r t g r a n t s r e v i e w o n i t s o w n m o t i o n o f t h e f o l l o w i n g q u e s t i o n :

D i d t h e c o u r t o f a p p e a l s e r r i n i t s a p p l i c a t i o n o f P e n a l C o d e § 2

. 0 2 ?

A p p e l l a n t ’ s b r i e f i s d u e w i t h i n t h i r t y d a y s o f t h e d a t e o f t h i s o r d e r

. T h e S t a t e ’ s

b r i e f i s d u e t h i r t y d a y s a f t e r t h e t i m e l y f

i l i n g o f A p p e l l a n t ’ s b r i e f

. O r a l a r g u m e n t w i l l

n o t b e p e r m i t t e d

.BA UMGART- 2

T h e C l e r k o f t h i s C o u r t w i l l s e n d c o p i e s o f t h i s o r d e r t o t h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s f o r t h e

F o u r t e e n t h D i s t r i c t
, t h e S t a t e P r o s e c u t i n g A t t o r n e y , t h e D i s t r i c t A t t o r n e y f o r H a r r i s C o u n t y ,

a n d A p p e l l a n t

.

E n t e r e d M a r c h 9

, 2 0 1 6
D o N o t P u b l i s h
No. 01-13-00046-CV 

_________________________________________________________________

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

____________________

Annie East,

 

 Appellant,

v.

Southwest Cimm’s, Inc. d/b/a Burger King #1002 a/k/a Cimm’s Incorporated,

 

 Appellee.

____________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. Two (2)

Harris County, Texas 

Cause No. 997701

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS

 

Pursuant to Rule 42.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, Appellant 

and Appellee file this joint motion to dismiss and in support, would show:

A.

Appellant and Appellee no longer wish to pursue an appeal of this case. All 

matters between Appellant and Appellee have been settled and resolved.

B.

For this reason, the Appellant and the Appellee request that this Court dismiss 

ACCEPTED

01-13-00046-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/10/2015 2:13:03 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/10/2015 2:13:03 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
2

this appeal with prejudice.

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Otha T. Carpenter*

Otha T. Carpenter

saxofpraise@aol.com

State Bar Number 03847500

4606 FM 1960 W., Suite 400

Houston, Texas 77069

Telephone (713) 227-2833

Facsimile (281) 315-8863

COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT

THE HUDGINS LAW FIRM

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

By: /s/ Nicole James Petrelli

Spencer Edwards

State Bar Number 90001513

sedwards@hudgins-law.com

Nicole James Petrelli

State Bar Number 24035568

npetrelli@hudgins-law.com

24 Greenway Plaza, Suite 2000

Houston, Texas 77046

Telephone (713) 623-2550

Facsimile (713) 623-2793

COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE

*with permission
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to Rule 9.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, I hereby 

certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Joint Motion to Dismiss was 

served on the following:

Otha T. Capenter

saxofpraise@aol.com

4606 FM 1960 West, Suite 400

Houston, Texas 77069

Counsel for Appellant

via electronic service on this 10th day of April 2015.

/s/ Nicole James Petrelli

Nicole James Petrelli
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATIONS      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

| Dated: | May                9, 2007 |   |   |   | RIDGEWOOD                ENERGY L FUND, LLC                      |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                       |   |   |   |                                                             |
|   |                       | By:    | /s/    |   | ROBERT                E. SWANSON                                 |
|   |                       |   | Name:  |   | Robert                E. Swanson                                 |
|   |                       |   | Title: |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer             |
|   |                       |   |   |   | (Principal                Executive Officer)                     |
|   |                       |   |   |   |                                                             |
| Dated: | May                9, 2007 |   |   |   |                                                             |
|   |                       | By:    | /s/    |   | KATHLEEN                P. MCSHERRY                              |
|   |                       |   | Name:  |   | Kathleen                P. McSherry                              |
|   |                       |   | Title: |   | Senior                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                       |   |   |   | (Principal                Financial and Accounting Officer)      |
|   |                       |   |   |   |                                                             |
|   |                       |   |   |   |                                                             |

----
Exhibit 31.1







I, Gianni P. Gatto, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports
on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Daimler Trucks Retail Trust 2022-1
(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
Act periodic reports;



4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied
on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Indenture
Trustee.



Date: March 20, 2023



| | By: /s/ Gianni P. Gatto                                                                                                    
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Name: Gianni P. Gatto                                                                                                      
| | Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function for the Servicer)
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 9, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00864-CR

DARREN TRAVELL HUGHES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 177th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 985661

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant was convicted of the offense of sexual assault of a child and 

sentenced to confinement for three years on January 25, 2005. On October 8, 2014, 

appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.

A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence 

is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal which complies with the requirements of 
2

Rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 

981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, 

a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. 

Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. 

Id.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
September 17, 2015

Mr. Spencer Morgan

Chief Pilot

Drone Teyk International Incorporated d/b/a Robo F lyers

3055 Gable Brook Drive

Chattanooga, TN 37421

D ear Mr. Morgan :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Part 21 and § § 45.23(b), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2), 91.109, 91.119, 91.121,

91.151(a), 91.203(a) and (b), 91.205(b), 91.215, and 91.401

- 91.417 of Ti tle 14, Code of

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you

should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request , posted to the public docket on July 6, 2015 on behalf of

Drone Teyk International Incorporated d/b/a Robo F lyers in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2564 , but

we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must

send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exempt ion

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34