alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1030 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to amend the definition of the 

term ‘‘spouse’’ to recognize new State definitions of such term for the 

purpose of the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2019 

Ms. TITUS (for herself, Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Ms. GABBARD, Mr. 

GRIJALVA, Ms. HAALAND, Mr. HIGGINS of New York, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. NORTON, 

Mr. PETERS, Ms. PINGREE, Mr. RUSH, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. SUOZZI, 

Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, and Ms. WILSON of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to amend the definition of the term ‘‘spouse’’ to recognize new State definitions of such term for the purpose of the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veteran Spouses Equal 

5 Treatment Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1030 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SPOUSE FOR PURPOSES OF VET2 ERAN BENEFITS TO REFLECT NEW STATE 

3 DEFINITIONS OF SPOUSE. 

4 (a) DEFINITIONS.—Section 101 of title 38, United 

5 States Code is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘of the oppo7 site sex’’; and 

8 (2) in paragraph (31), by striking ‘‘of the oppo9 site sex who is a wife or husband’’ and inserting ‘‘in 

10 a marriage recognized under section 103 of this 

11 title’’. 

12 (b) DETERMINATION.—Subsection (c) of section 103 

13 of such title is amended to read as follows: 

14 ‘‘(c)(1) For the purposes of all laws administered by 

15 the Secretary, the Secretary shall recognize a marriage 

16 based on the law of the State where the marriage oc17 curred. In the case of a marriage that occurred outside 

18 a State, the Secretary shall recognize the marriage if the 

19 marriage was lawful in the place where it occurred and 

20 could have been entered into under the laws of any State. 

21 Except in the case of a purported marriage deemed valid 

22 under subsection (a), the Secretary may not recognize 

23 more than one marriage for any person at the same time. 

24 ‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘State’ has the 

25 meaning given that the term in section 101(20) of this 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 1030 IH

1 title, except that such term also includes the Common2 wealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
11 Federal Milk Marketing Order Areas

Pacific 

Northwest 

F.O. 124.

California 

F.O. 51.

Arizona 

F.O. 131.

Southwest 

F.O. 126.

Central 

F.O. 32.

Upper Midwest F.O. 30.

Mideast 

F.O. 33.

Southeast 

F.O. 7.

Florida 

F.O. 6.

Appalachian 

F.O. 5.

Northeast 

F.O. 1.
#### In the Matter of Lakim L. Allah, Appellant, v Thomas A. Coughlin, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Dadd, J. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.—Article 78.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Den-man, Boomer, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
Fiscal Year 2023

Inspection and Weighing Program

Revenue Operating 

Expense

Earnings/

Loss Metric Tons

NATIONAL $4,690,820 $1,650,062 $3,040,758 96,609,360 

FIELD OFFICES

Pacific Northwest $245,825 $374,859 -$129,034 1,754,725 

Toledo $119,246 $167,053 -$47,807 790,400 

New Orleans $1,168,497 $715,554 $452,943 56,312,940 

League City $352,468 $672,847 -$320,379 5,824,829 

Export Hourly & Inspection Fees $21,124,918 $26,677,992 -$5,553,074 n/a 

Non-Export Hourly & Inspection Fees1 $507,157 $1,491,786 -$984,629 n/a 

Program Total $28,208,931 $31,750,153 -$3,541,221 n/a 

1 Includes revenue and operating expenses for domestic field offices, scale testing programs, 

registration program, and Technology & Science Division.

Note: FY23 overhead obligations were rebalanced with $4.6M appropriated.

Dated: 11/06/2023
# FGIS-923

# Instructions
August 2 7, 2012

Elizabeth McDermott Office of Underground Storage Tanks U.S. EPA/OSWER/OUST 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Mail Code: 5401P Washington, DC 20460 **Re :**  Response to EPA questions concerning written comments submitted by the Petroleum Marketers Association of America on NPRM; Revisions to Existing Requirements and New Requirements for Secondary Containment and Operator Training ( 76 Federal Register 71708 ).

Dear Ms. McDermott: Please find attached answers to your questions concernin g PMAA’s written comments on proposed UST amendments and our concerns over the agency’s estimation of costs that the proposed rule will impose on small business petrol eum marketers. Also attached are a number of data sources that support PMAA’s cost estimates and related information. I would like to meet with you along with petroleum marketer members of the PMAA UST Task force to discuss our concerns in greater detail. Please let me know of a convenient time for you to meet with us. Thank you. Sincerely,

Mark S. Morgan Regulatory Counsel Petroleum Marketers Association of America
**Certifications**

 

 

I, Paul Vanderslice, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reportson Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by thisreport on Form 10-K, of BMO 2023-C7 Mortgage Trust (the “Exchange Act PeriodicReports”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports,taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicingand other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliancestatement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, andexcept as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicers havefulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all materialrespects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included asan exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably reliedon information provided to me by the following unaffiliatedparties: Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation; KeyBank National Association; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC;Computershare Trust Company, National Association; SCPServicing, LLC; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; ArgenticServices Company LP; BellOak, LLC; LNR Partners, LLC; Rialto Capital Advisors,LLC; and Greystone Servicing Company LLC.

 

 

Date: March 29, 2024

 

/s/ PaulVanderslice                                                   

Paul Vanderslice

Chief Executive Officer, BMO Commercial Mortgage SecuritiesLLC

(senior officer in charge of securitization of thedepositor)
I Gathering information

I Observation

I Memory

Mr. Holmes to Dr. Watson

“You have seen but not

observed.”

To Observe:

“To see or sense, especiafly through

directed careful analytic attention; to

come to realize or know especially

through consideration of noted facts.”

Webster’s New College Dictior,isry.

1
I How?

I TIP: Look at the Big

Picture:

I Plan ahead

I Learn through experience

I Know what the message is

What affects observation?

I Sight

I Sound

I.Touch

I Smell

I Taste

I Intuition

Other influences

Religion

Gender

Personality Style

Health

Culture

Perceptions

lAge I

I Location I

I Family I

I Life Experiences I

I Education & I

Training i

I

2
I AbiBtyto

I register the information

I store the information

I recall the information stored

Me

I Our senses register

the information —

I Our brain sorts it out

- what do we wantto

keep and for how

long?

I Long term memory

I Short temi memory

How do we remember?

I Sensory memory

I Olfactory

I Tactile

I Kinesthetic

I Verbal

I Emotional

1 Learning style

I Auditory - what you

hear; tone, language,

etc.

Visual -what you see;

layout; det3ils of a

picture; etc.

I Kinesthetic — active

participation

I Multi-sensory — more

than one style

3
I Interference

I Clues are different

How can we enhance our

observation/memory?

I Plan

I Interest

I Understand

I Confidence

I Pay attention

I Rehearse/Practice

4.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #13060 and #13061]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of OREGON dated 04/02/2012. *Incident:*
                         Severe Winter Storm System. *Incident Period:*
                         01/17/2012 through 01/21/2012. *Effective Date:*
                         04/02/2012. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/01/2012. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         01/02/2013.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Marion. *Contiguous Counties:* Oregon: Clackamas, Jefferson, Linn, Polk, Wasco, Yamhill. The Interest Rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.125Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.063Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.125Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000For Economic Injury:Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 13060B and for economic injury is 130610. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Oregon. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: April 2, 2012. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2012-9499 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 81 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 17, 2019 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make 

a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 1158. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1158, 

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the 

4 following correction: Amend the long title so as to read: 

5 ‘‘Making consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year 

6 ending September 30, 2020, and for other purposes.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 17, 

2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

 Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF COTTON

FOR RELEASE AT 12:00 P.M. CT January 11, 2022

U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of cotton. The cotton bales were

sold on The SEAM dated January 10, 2022. 

Offer No. Catalog Location Pounds

Sold 

Bales 

Sold 

Price Sold 

(per Pound) CCC Revenue

TS1120049 AR, GA, LA, 

MS, MO, & TN 42,445 87 $.2755 $11,693.67
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Elbert L. Thompson, Appellant.

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the sentencing court erred in failing to honor its sentence agreement. Where, as here, the court expressly and specifically made its commitment to impose the minimum permissible sentence of two to four years subject to certain conditions and defendant subsequently violated one of those conditions, the court was no longer bound by the agreement but could impose a greater sentence without offering defendant an opportunity to withdraw his plea *(see, People v Murello,*39 NY2d 879; *People v Brooks,*154 AD2d 931; *People v Harvey,*146 AD2d 585, 586, *lv denied*73 NY2d 922; *People v Dodson,*114 AD2d 421, 422).

The People were not required to charge the defense of agency to the Grand Jury. The evidence before the Grand Jury did not present a case of agency and, unlike *People v*
      *1008
      *Valles*(62 NY2d 36), defendant did not testify before the Grand Jury nor did he request that the defense of agency be charged *(see, People v Beverly,*148 AD2d 922, *lv denied*74 NY2d 661). Moreover, there is no requirement "that the Grand Jury must be charged with every potential defense suggested by the evidence” *(People v Valles, supra,*at 38) and the evidence "did not so clearly support the [agency] defense as to require its submission” *(People v Valles, supra,*at 41 [Kaye, J., concurring]; *People v Beverly, supra,*at 923).

Finally, we find that the sentence imposed was not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J.—Attempted Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 4th Degree.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
WALLIN F. CALHOUN,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-1511

Opinion filed April 14, 2015.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original 

Jurisdiction.

Wallin F. Calhoun, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the 

merits.

ROBERTS, SWANSON, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 67 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 67

    Disapproving the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service 
  relating to charitable contribution and estate tax deductions under 
     section 170 when a taxpayer receives or expects to receive a 
                corresponding state or local tax credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 2019

  Mr. Gottheimer (for himself and Mr. King of New York) submitted the 
following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 
                               and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Disapproving the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service 
  relating to charitable contribution and estate tax deductions under 
     section 170 when a taxpayer receives or expects to receive a 
                corresponding state or local tax credit.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to charitable 
contribution and estate tax deductions under section 170 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 when a taxpayer receives or expects to 
receive a corresponding state or local tax credit (published at 84 Fed. 
Reg. 27513 (June 13, 2019)), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.
                                 <all>
```
FORT WORTH OFFICE | 201 MAIN STREET, SUITE 2500 | FORT WORTH, TX 76102 | TELEPHONE: (817) 332-2500 | FAX: (817) 878-9280 

AUSTIN OFFICE | 301 CONGRESS, SUITE 2000 | AUSTIN, TX 78701 | TELEPHONE: (512) 495-6400 | FAX: (512) 495-6401 

MIDLAND OFFICE | 508 W. WALL, SUITE 444 | MIDLAND, TX 79701 | TELEPHONE: (432) 683-4691 | FAX: (432) 683-6518

NEW ORLEANS OFFICE | 400 POYDRAS STREET, SUITE 1812 | NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130 | TELEPHONE: (504) 522-1812 | FAX: (504) 522-1813 

Kelly Hart & Hallman, a Limited Liability Partnership | www.kellyhart.com 

MARY H. SMITH 

mary.smith@kellyhart.com 

TELEPHONE: 817.878.9388 

FAX: 817.878.9788 

April 13, 2015 

Via Electronic Filing: 

Ms. Vivian Long 

Clerk, Seventh Court of Appeals 

P.O. Box 9540 

Amarillo, Texas 79105 

Re: No. 07-15-00126-CV; Matthew Eugene Devine v. Vicki Dianne Devine

Dear Ms. Long: 

Enclosed please find the Order Denying Petitioner’s Motion to Set Amount and 

Type of Security for Supersedeas as referenced in Appellant’s Emergency Motion 

for Review of Trial Court Ruling Pursuant to Rule 24.4 filed on April 9, 2015 in 

the above-referenced matter. 

Thank you for your attention in this matter. Should you have any questions, please 

do not hesitate to contact me. 

Sincerely yours, 

/s/ Mary H. Smith 

Mary H. Smith 

MHS/srb 

Enclosure: 

cc: James V. Jay, IV 

 jimj@lawgjm.com 

 Thomas M. Michel 

 thomasm@lawgjm.com 

 Robley E. Sicard 

 robleys@lawgjm.com 

Counsel for Appellee

ACCEPTED

07-15-00126-cv

SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS

AMARILLO, TEXAS

4/13/2015 1:44:02 PM

Vivian Long, Clerk

 FILED IN 7th COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 4/13/2015 1:44:02 PM VIVIAN LONG CLERK
324-552104-14

CAUSE NO. 324-552104-14

MATTHEW EUGENE DEVINE § IN THE DISTRICT COURT

§

V. § 324TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

§

VICKI DIANNE DEVINE § TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO SET

AMOUNT AND TYPE OF SECURITY FOR SUPERSEDEAS

On March 26, 2015, came on for consideration Petitioner's Motion to Set Amount

and Type of Security for Supersedeas. The Court, having considered the motion, the

response, and the argument of counsel, is of the opinion that the motion should be and is

hereby DENIED.

IT IS THEREFORE ordered that Petitioner's Motion to Set Amount and Type of

Security for Supersedeas is hereby DENIED.

SIGNED this

^7 day of 4-2 ,2015.

t

JUDGKPRESIDING

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION T O SET AMOUNT AND TYPE OF SECURITY FOR SUPERSEDEAS Page I

COURT'S MINUTES

TRANSACTION#

SCfG
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

JAMES F. OUTLAW,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,

Respondent.

______________________ 

2013-3061

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in consolidated Nos. DE0752110279-I-2 and 

DE0752110514-I-1. 

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

Before NEWMAN, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

James F. Outlaw moves for reconsideration of the 

court’s previous rejection of his petition for review.

The Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) issued 

its final order on October 19, 2012. Mr. Outlaw received 

Case: 13-3061 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 06/19/2013
2 JAMES OUTLAW v. ARMY

the order via electronic mail on October 19, 2012.* Mr. 

Outlaw’s petition was received by this court on December 

21, 2012, sixty-three days after he received the Board’s 

final order. 

Our review of a Board decision or order is governed by 

5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1), which provides in relevant part that 

“[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law, any petition for review shall be filed within 60 days after the 

Board issues notice of the final order or decision of the 

Board.” 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) (2012). This filing period 

is “statutory, mandatory, [and] jurisdictional.” Monzo v. 

Dep’t of Transp., 735 F.2d 1335, 1336 (Fed. Cir. 1984); see 

also Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205 (2007) (the timely

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement that cannot be waived). We also note that 

the petition for review must be received by this court by 

the due date, Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A), and that petitions for review cannot be filed by fax or electronically 

with this court, Fed. Cir. R. 25. 

Because Mr. Outlaw’s petition was not received within 60 days of the date he received the Board’s decision, we 

must dismiss his petition as untimely.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

1) Mr. Outlaw’s motion for reconsideration is denied, 

and his petition is dismissed. 

(2) All sides shall bear their own costs. 

*Mr. Outlaw is a registered electronic filer with the 

Board. The regulation governing the dates for service of 

electronic documents at the Board states, in relevant part,

“MSPB documents served electronically on registered efilers are deemed received on the date of electronic submission.” 5 C.F.R. § 1201.14(m)(2).

 

Case: 13-3061 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 06/19/2013
 JAMES OUTLAW v. ARMY 3

 FOR THE COURT

 

 /s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

 Daniel E. O'Toole 

 Clerk 

s25

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: June 19, 2013

Case: 13-3061 Document: 8 Page: 3 Filed: 06/19/2013