UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON D.C., 20460

OFFICE OF

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND

POLLUTION PREVENTION

April 9, 2012

PC Code: 080803

DP: 397652

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT:

TO:

THROUGH:

FROM:

Evaluation of Drinking Water Monitoring Data for Total Chloro-triazines (TCT)

for Decommissioning Monitoring Sites in the Syngenta Atrazine Monitoring

Program of Community Water Systems (CWS)

Steven Weiss, Acting Branch Chief

Anne Overstreet, Team Leader

Melanie Biscoe, Chemical Review Manager

Pesticide Reevaluation Division D _

Rosanna Louie-Juzwiak.RAPL~~ / )

Dana Spatz, Branch Chief L/ e.,.

Environmental Risk Branch 3 I LEnvironmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P)

James A. Hetrick Ph.D., Senior Science Advisor t' /~,viHannah Yingling, Student Biologist ttd

Environmental Risk Branch 3

Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P)

This memorandum provides results of an evaluation ofthe AMP monitoring data for

decommissioning of 78 community water systems (CWS) monitoring sites. These data have

been submitted by Syngenta to support reregistration of atrazine. Atrazine registrants agreed,

through a Memorandum ofAgreement (MOA) with EPA, to intensively monitor both raw and

treated water in these systems to assess the occurrence of atrazine, simazine, and their

degradation products (desethylalrazine (DEA), desisopropylatrazine (DlA),

diaminochlorotriazine (DACT)), hereafter cumulatively referred to as total chloro-triazines

(TCD· The monitoring data were evaluated to assess whether atrazine or TCT concentrations in

raw or finished water at any ofthe 78 CWSs exceed the trigger concentrations as agreed upon in

the MOA.

,
2 

To determine the annual average or rolling average concentrations, time-weighted concentrations 

were used to provide an estimate of the concentrations. Annual chemographs (365 days) were 

generated for each site-year using a stair-step interpolation. The concentration at the tails of each 

chemograph, (i.e., the days before the first measured value and days after the last measured 

values for which no monitoring samples were taken) is an uncertainty in the chemograph 

construct. Therefore, in order to attempt to bound the concentration estimates according to the 

interpolated values at the tails of the chemograph, the tails were assumed to be equal to either 

0.16 μg/L (i.e., summation of detection limits of total chloro-triazines), or equal to the first or 

last measured value in the chemograph. 

Additionally, the atrazine Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) exceedance criteria are based on 

the annual averaging from a single sample in each quarter of the year. Because the AMP data 

have more than one sample per quarter, the traditional calculation of an annual average from 4 

quarterly samples may not be appropriate. Therefore, the time-weighted annual average 

concentration was estimated as a MCL exceedance trigger. This method is conservative because 

it considers all the measured concentrations with their approximate time duration. 

The EFED evaluation of the AMP monitoring data provides the following conclusions: 

• None of the 78 CWS meet or exceed 12.5 ppb TCT as a 90-day rolling averages in raw 

water. 

• Ten of the 78 CWS have met or exceeded 2.6 ppb as an annual average in finished water 

within the past 5 years (Table 1, Columns D and E; Tables 2-5). 

• The 78 CWS have been below the atrazine Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 3 ppb 

atrazine as a time-weighted (TW) annual average in finished water (Table 1, Columns F and 

G) for 6 consecutive years (2006-2011). 
3 

Table 1: AMP Sites Exceeding the Annual Average TCT Trigger Concentration of 2.6 μg/L in 

Finished Water within the Past 5 Years 

A B C D E F G 

Community 

Water System Year N 

TCT 

Annual 

Average 

Measured 

Tails 

(μg/L) 

TCT 

Annual 

Average 

Detection 

Limit Tails 

(μg/L) 

Time 

Weighted 

Atrazine 

Annual 

Average 

Measured 

Tails 

(μg/L) 

Time 

Weighted 

Atrazine 

Annual 

Average 

Detection 

Limit Tails 

(μg/L) 

Centralia Water 

Treatment Plant 2007 32 2.62 2.59 0.95 0.95 

Evansville 

2007 33 3.47 3.44 1.54 1.54 

2008 25 2.69 2.53 1.19 1.19 

2009 27 3.06 2.14 1.16 1.16 

2010 34 2.91 2.76 1.24 1.24 

Farina Water 

Treatment Plant 

2007 40 4.51 4.49 0.43 0.43 

2008 33 5.18 4.48 1.15 1.15 

2009 39 5.69 5.39 0.84 0.84 

2010 41 4.35 4.25 0.96 0.96 

2011 39 5.28 5.09 0.41 0.41 

Mattoon 

2008 32 2.74 2.50 0.40 0.40 

2009 32 5.42 4.92 0.79 0.79 

2010 31 3.29 2.40 0.26 0.26 

Mt. Olive Water 

Works 

2007 33 3.12 3.03 1.85 1.85 

2008 32 3.08 2.87 2.12 2.12 

Beloit Water 

Department 2008 29 3.23 3.10 2.32 2.32 

Maryville Water 

Treatment Plant 2007 33 2.90 2.84 2.01 2.01 

Blanchester 

2008 32 4.26 1.72 2.32 2.78 

2009 34 3.93 1.46 0.88 2.65 

McClure Water 

Treatment Plant 2008 31 2.69 2.60 1.73 1.73 

Piqua--Swift 

Lake 2008 33 3.02 2.99 2.07 2.07 

N = number of samples 

Data Evaluation Process 

Calculation of an annual average using a chemograph allows TCT concentrations to be weighted 

by their duration. The chemograph was created representing day 1 through 365 with submitted 

data entered at the date of collection; data were stair-stepped between these points giving each 

day a TCT concentration. The annual average was calculated using two methods. One used the 

detection limit (0.16 ppb) as the tails for the data set; 0.16 ppb was filled in for all dates up until 
4 

the first measurement was taken and for all dates after the last measurement was taken. Another 

used the first number and last number as the tails for the data set; the first concentration was 

filled in for all data before the first measurement was taken and the last measurement taken was 

filled in for all remaining dates. The differences between these methods can be seen in Graph 1 

and 2 (below). This calculation is used to identify CWS that have met or exceeded annual 

averages of 2.6 ppb TCT in finished water within the past 5 years. Because the two calculation 

methods provide bounding estimates, they provide a range of concentrations. 

Quarterly 90 day averages were calculated using the data generated from both of the tail methods 

outlined above. 90 day Quarterly averages are calculated by averaging 90 day intervals (Quarter 

1: Day 1-90; Quarter 2: 91-180; Quarter 3: 181-270; Quarter 4: 271-365). A 90-day maximum 

average was calculated to ensure that any 90 day rolling average did not exceed the allowed ppb. 

This calculation is used to identify CWS which have met or exceeded 12.5 ppb TCT as a 90 day 

rolling average in raw water. 

Quality Assurance Process 

To ensure accuracy of the Excel Macro spreadsheet calculations of the annual and 90-day TCT 

averages in raw and finished drinking water, 4 sets of data were manually evaluated. Verified 

calculations include: arithmetic average, annual average, and 4 quarterly 90-day averages using 

both tail methods. A chemograph was created representing day 1 through 365, each associated 

with a date and concentration. Data were infilled and stair-stepped in the manner outlined above. 

Figures 1 and 2 (below) were created using the QA data to help visualize the chemograph, stairstepping, and differences in tail methods. 

Figure 1: LaFourche Water District #1 TCT concentrations (Finished water) in 2004 as 

chemograph using tails as first and last number 

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

TCT Concentration (ppb)

Date
5 

Figure 2: LaFourche Water District #1 TCT concentrations (Finished water) in 2004 as 

chemograph using Detection limit as tails (0.16) 

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

TCT Concentration (ppb)

Date
Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

StocktonEast WaterDistrict Not enough data for 2006StocktonEast WaterDistrict 2007 24 0 0.36 0.33 0.53 3.00 0.23 5.00 0.35 6.00 0.38 StocktonEast WaterDistrict‐‐NewMelonesReservoir 2007 4 0 0.35 0.21 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.18 Sumner Hills Not enough data for 2006Sumner Hills 2007 28 0 0.35 0.32 0.35 3.00 0.23 5.00 0.35 7.00 0.35 Belle Glade Not enough data for 2006Belle Glade 2007 37 0 0.67 0.61 1.64 8.00 0.51 10.00 0.66 8.00 0.77 Lee County

Utilities 2007 17 0 0.40 0.37 0.76 8.00 0.43 8.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 

Peace RiverRegionalWater Not enough data for 2006Peace RiverRegionalWater 2007 37 0 0.36 0.36 0.45 8.00 0.40 10.00 0.35 8.00 0.35 Punta Gorda Not enough data for 2006Punta Gorda 2007 36 0 0.37 0.37 0.60 8.00 0.40 10.00 0.36 8.00 0.35 CentervilleMunicipalWaterWorks 2003 23 0 2.11 1.48 4.48 0.00 0.00 10.00 2.62 7.00 1.68 CentervilleMunicipalWaterWorks 2004 31 0 0.39 0.40 1.51 6.00 0.77 11.00 0.26 8.00 0.28 Centerville 2005 34 0 0.35 0.36 0.53 7.00 0.36 12.00 0.28 9.00 0.39 
7 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

MunicipalWaterWorksCentervilleMunicipalWaterWorks 2006 19 0 0.42 0.30 2.26 10.00 0.69 7.00 0.11 2.00 0.26 CharitonMunicipalWaterWorks 2003 23 0 0.92 0.66 2.35 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.70 7.00 0.46 CharitonMunicipalWaterWorks 2004 31 0 1.55 1.60 2.36 6.00 1.42 11.00 1.03 8.00 1.92 CharitonMunicipalWaterWorks 2005 34 0 0.82 0.89 2.91 7.00 2.21 12.00 0.38 9.00 0.47 CharitonMunicipalWaterWorks 2006 40 0 0.51 0.50 1.42 9.00 0.56 14.00 0.42 11.00 0.50 CharitonMunicipalWaterWorks 2007 29 0 0.77 0.68 1.84 7.00 0.80 10.00 0.79 9.00 0.63 CharitonMunicipalWaterWorks 2008 32 0 0.76 0.69 1.35 6.00 0.56 13.00 0.57 8.00 0.95 CharitonMunicipalWaterWorks 2009 8 0 0.81 0.44 1.70 6.00 0.65 1.00 0.56 1.00 0.41 Creston Not enough data for 2006Creston 2007 33 0 2.11 2.06 4.13 7.00 1.34 11.00 1.96 9.00 2.99 Creston 2010 33 0 1.86 1.77 3.75 6.00 1.02 13.00 1.37 9.00 2.84 
8 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Creston‐‐ 12Mile Lake Not enough data for 2007Creston‐‐ 3Mile Lake 2003 22 0 2.48 1.68 3.16 0.00 0.00 7.00 1.53 9.00 2.72 Creston‐‐ 3Mile Lake 2004 31 0 2.06 1.99 3.31 6.00 2.10 11.00 1.79 8.00 2.48 Creston‐‐ 3Mile Lake 2005 35 0 1.98 1.85 4.59 7.00 1.80 13.00 1.95 9.00 2.32 Creston‐‐ 3Mile Lake 2006 37 0 1.15 1.08 2.56 8.00 1.23 13.00 1.04 11.00 1.27 Creston‐‐ 3Mile Lake 2008 29 0 1.70 1.66 3.38 6.00 1.51 12.00 1.23 6.00 2.47 Creston‐‐ 3Mile Lake 2009 33 0 1.50 1.50 2.13 6.00 1.29 13.00 1.35 7.00 1.81 Creston‐‐ 3Mile Lake 2011 34 0 2.46 2.34 3.84 6.00 1.63 13.00 2.18 9.00 3.06 LamoniMunicipalUtilities 2003 22 0 0.98 0.79 3.89 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.32 9.00 1.72 LamoniMunicipalUtilities 2004 30 0 1.16 1.10 2.38 5.00 0.54 11.00 0.82 8.00 1.54 LamoniMunicipalUtilities 2005 35 0 0.82 0.93 2.83 7.00 2.04 13.00 0.33 9.00 0.58 LamoniMunicipalUtilities 2006 34 0 0.33 0.28 1.60 9.00 0.43 13.00 0.12 11.00 0.31 Leon WaterWorks 2003 25 0 1.04 0.74 2.37 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.31 8.00 0.70 Leon WaterWorks 2004 31 0 0.69 0.65 1.59 6.00 1.08 11.00 0.50 8.00 0.62 Leon WaterWorks 2005 15 0 0.82 1.22 1.79 7.00 1.22 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.48 Leon WaterWorks 2006 34 0 0.07 0.09 0.36 9.00 0.11 13.00 0.05 11.00 0.05 MontezumaMunicipalWater 2003 25 0 0.32 0.29 0.68 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.26 8.00 0.28 
9 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

MontezumaMunicipalWater 2004 31 0 0.48 0.47 0.82 6.00 0.55 11.00 0.35 8.00 0.54 MontezumaMunicipalWater 2005 35 0 0.44 0.43 0.86 7.00 0.45 13.00 0.42 9.00 0.46 MontezumaMunicipalWater 2006 41 0 0.09 0.08 0.40 9.00 0.09 14.00 0.06 11.00 0.06 MontezumaMunicipalWater 2007 33 0 0.37 0.36 0.53 7.00 0.39 11.00 0.35 9.00 0.37 MontezumaMunicipalWater 2008 32 0 0.44 0.40 0.75 6.00 0.33 13.00 0.43 8.00 0.47 MontezumaMunicipalWater 2009 34 0 0.43 0.42 0.82 6.00 0.34 13.00 0.40 8.00 0.52 MontezumaMunicipalWater 2010 33 0 0.57 0.50 1.08 5.00 0.40 13.00 0.68 9.00 0.57 MontezumaMunicipalWater 2011 34 0 0.52 0.54 0.99 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.37 9.00 0.68 OsceolaMunicipalWaterWorks 2003 18 0 1.69 1.16 3.95 0.00 0.00 7.00 1.52 7.00 0.89 OsceolaMunicipalWaterWorks 2004 30 0 0.92 0.87 2.26 5.00 1.55 11.00 0.81 8.00 0.45 OsceolaMunicipalWaterWorks 2005 34 0 0.76 0.80 1.40 7.00 1.19 12.00 0.50 9.00 0.68 OsceolaMunicipalWater 2006 38 0 0.65 0.59 1.99 8.00 0.79 14.00 0.63 9.00 0.59 
10 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

WorksOsceolaMunicipalWaterWorks 2007 32 0 0.53 0.51 0.82 7.00 0.69 10.00 0.59 9.00 0.36 OsceolaMunicipalWaterWorks 2008 29 0 0.81 0.80 1.60 7.00 0.47 12.00 0.47 6.00 1.46 OsceolaMunicipalWaterWorks 2009 14 0 0.90 0.46 1.57 5.00 0.94 9.00 0.57 0.00 0.00 RathbunRegionalWaterAssociation 2003 25 0 0.86 0.68 1.59 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.59 8.00 0.72 RathbunRegionalWaterAssociation 2004 31 0 1.01 1.04 1.79 6.00 1.47 11.00 0.65 8.00 0.76 RathbunRegionalWaterAssociation 2005 35 0 0.88 0.86 2.20 7.00 1.58 13.00 0.81 9.00 0.53 RathbunRegionalWaterAssociation 2006 34 0 0.70 0.56 1.42 9.00 0.64 13.00 0.65 11.00 0.71 WintersetWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 22 0 1.80 1.21 3.02 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.44 8.00 1.54 WintersetWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 31 0 0.59 0.62 1.90 6.00 1.36 11.00 0.37 8.00 0.36 WintersetWater 2005 35 0 0.71 0.65 5.21 7.00 0.56 13.00 0.95 9.00 0.53 
11 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

TreatmentPlantWintersetWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 41 0 0.41 0.38 1.54 9.00 0.65 14.00 0.42 11.00 0.25 WintersetWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 33 0 0.53 0.51 1.12 7.00 0.43 11.00 0.66 9.00 0.56 WintersetWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 30 0 0.47 0.42 1.43 5.00 0.34 13.00 0.52 7.00 0.47 WintersetWaterTreatmentPlant 2009 16 0 0.51 0.31 1.15 6.00 0.33 10.00 0.58 0.00 0.00 Aqua ILVermillionCo 2003 25 0 3.04 1.92 16.67 0.00 0.00 11.00 5.67 8.00 1.49 Aqua ILVermillionCo 2004 31 0 1.18 1.26 10.05 6.00 0.32 11.00 3.41 8.00 0.94 Aqua ILVermillionCo 2005 34 0 2.12 1.71 8.83 7.00 0.43 12.00 3.45 9.00 2.44 Aqua ILVermillionCo 2006 39 0 1.21 1.09 6.27 8.00 0.60 14.00 1.80 10.00 1.05 Aqua ILVermillionCo 2007 32 0 1.50 1.31 6.20 7.00 0.44 10.00 2.12 9.00 1.77 Aqua ILVermillionCo 2008 33 0 1.38 1.09 5.12 7.00 0.44 12.00 1.86 9.00 1.60 Aqua ILVermillionCo 2009 34 0 1.64 1.30 12.04 6.00 0.48 13.00 2.75 8.00 1.29 
12 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Aqua ILVermillionCo 2010 33 0 0.74 0.67 2.80 6.00 0.41 12.00 1.15 9.00 0.65 Aqua ILVermillionCo 2011 34 0 1.78 1.39 11.31 6.00 0.44 13.00 3.35 10.00 1.15 Ashland CityHall 2003 27 0 2.68 1.95 5.74 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.73 8.00 2.43 Ashland CityHall 2004 30 0 1.45 1.44 3.22 6.00 2.06 10.00 1.32 8.00 1.35 Ashland CityHall 2005 35 0 0.51 0.47 1.72 7.00 0.54 13.00 0.59 9.00 0.48 Ashland CityHall 2006 37 0 0.29 0.28 1.29 8.00 0.48 13.00 0.24 9.00 0.25 Ashland CityHall 2007 32 0 0.48 0.47 0.71 7.00 0.50 11.00 0.44 9.00 0.51 Ashland CityHall 2008 30 0 0.87 0.84 2.14 6.00 0.37 12.00 0.55 7.00 1.55 Ashland CityHall 2009 31 0 0.82 0.80 1.26 6.00 0.91 11.00 0.82 8.00 0.94 Ashland CityHall 2010 29 0 2.25 1.54 5.69 4.00 0.37 13.00 3.25 9.00 1.81 Ashland CityHall 2011 7 0 0.37 0.21 0.37 5.00 0.32 2.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 CarlinvilleWaterWorks 2003 22 0 1.59 1.03 3.66 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.55 8.00 1.70 CarlinvilleWaterWorks 2004 28 0 1.77 1.77 11.62 6.00 0.46 10.00 4.29 7.00 1.38 CarlinvilleWaterWorks 2005 33 0 0.64 0.60 2.13 7.00 0.38 12.00 0.38 9.00 1.10 CarlinvilleWaterWorks 2006 32 0 0.84 0.84 6.40 8.00 1.01 11.00 1.58 8.00 0.48 CarlinvilleWaterWorks 2007 33 0 1.12 1.04 2.70 6.00 0.70 13.00 1.33 9.00 1.14 
13 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

CarlinvilleWaterWorks 2008 29 0 1.10 0.86 3.57 5.00 0.54 13.00 1.35 7.00 1.10 CarlinvilleWaterWorks 2009 28 0 2.15 1.67 12.54 5.00 0.81 11.00 2.98 7.00 2.00 CarlinvilleWaterWorks 2010 33 0 0.95 0.76 2.60 5.00 0.39 13.00 1.37 9.00 0.75 CarlinvilleWaterWorks 2011 51 0 2.09 1.80 12.55 9.00 1.18 19.00 3.39 13.00 1.68 CarthagePublicUtilities 2003 26 0 0.76 0.59 1.21 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.79 8.00 0.68 CarthagePublicUtilities 2004 30 0 0.53 0.53 1.54 6.00 0.28 11.00 0.39 8.00 0.92 CarthagePublicUtilities 2005 33 0 1.04 0.95 2.60 7.00 0.50 12.00 1.33 9.00 1.27 CarthagePublicUtilities 2006 33 0 0.47 0.42 1.62 9.00 0.99 13.00 0.32 10.00 0.20 CentraliaWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 28 0 1.47 0.76 9.03 0.00 0.00 14.00 1.91 8.00 0.53 CentraliaWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 31 0 0.82 0.74 1.54 6.00 0.52 11.00 1.00 8.00 1.04 CentraliaWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 35 0 1.68 1.37 5.80 7.00 0.39 13.00 2.81 9.00 1.67 CentraliaWaterTreatment 2006 38 0 2.04 1.80 7.23 8.00 1.14 14.00 3.03 9.00 1.60 
14 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

PlantCentraliaWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 32 0 3.05 2.59 8.44 7.00 2.54 11.00 5.39 9.00 1.38 CentraliaWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 33 0 2.06 1.79 5.06 7.00 1.72 13.00 2.46 8.00 1.97 CentraliaWaterTreatmentPlant 2009 33 0 2.22 1.93 3.83 6.00 2.00 12.00 3.05 8.00 1.90 CentraliaWaterTreatmentPlant 2010 33 0 1.53 1.29 3.57 5.00 0.79 13.00 1.95 9.00 1.38 City ofWaverly 2003 22 0 4.60 3.31 18.58 0.00 0.00 10.00 8.06 6.00 3.08 City ofWaverly 2004 31 0 2.40 2.15 5.97 6.00 0.75 11.00 2.26 8.00 3.47 City ofWaverly 2005 33 0 1.64 1.58 4.65 7.00 0.46 11.00 1.46 9.00 3.24 City ofWaverly 2006 41 0 2.31 2.10 12.41 10.00 2.30 13.00 1.47 12.00 3.26 City ofWaverly 2007 23 0 0.98 0.98 1.44 6.00 0.96 8.00 1.15 5.00 1.04 City ofWaverly 2008 26 0 1.36 1.07 7.96 6.00 0.59 10.00 1.70 7.00 1.59 City ofWaverly 2009 28 0 2.19 1.49 6.61 6.00 0.53 11.00 2.78 7.00 2.22 City ofWaverly 2010 18 0 0.86 0.67 3.42 1.00 0.32 8.00 1.50 4.00 0.48 City ofWaverly 2011 21 0 1.12 0.85 4.23 3.00 0.39 9.00 1.96 6.00 0.62 CoultervilleWaterTreatment 2003 27 0 3.20 2.31 10.87 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.26 8.00 5.49 
15 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

PlantCoultervilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 31 0 1.89 1.80 2.78 6.00 0.98 11.00 2.03 8.00 2.48 CoultervilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 35 0 0.99 0.92 3.19 7.00 0.92 13.00 1.16 9.00 1.09 CoultervilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 39 0 1.65 1.40 4.81 8.00 1.18 14.00 2.11 10.00 1.43 CoultervilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 33 0 1.99 1.84 5.19 7.00 0.60 11.00 2.86 9.00 2.81 CoultervilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 32 0 0.70 0.61 3.54 6.00 0.50 13.00 0.89 8.00 0.48 CoultervilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2009 25 0 1.60 1.19 5.22 5.00 0.69 12.00 0.89 7.00 2.80 CoultervilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2010 21 0 0.60 0.41 0.78 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.38 9.00 0.61 CoultervilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2011 34 0 0.61 0.58 1.18 6.00 0.43 13.00 0.55 9.00 0.70 Evansville Not enough data for 2003Evansville 2004 31 0 4.01 3.43 43.48 6.00 0.76 11.00 10.18 8.00 1.92 Evansville 2005 35 0 4.85 3.55 31.37 7.00 0.78 13.00 9.93 9.00 2.71 
16 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Evansville 2006 38 0 4.43 3.34 27.93 8.00 2.44 14.00 8.95 10.00 1.48 Evansville 2007 33 0 3.94 3.44 20.18 7.00 2.89 11.00 7.11 9.00 2.85 Evansville 2008 25 0 3.55 2.53 15.15 6.00 2.05 11.00 5.14 5.00 2.39 Evansville 2009 27 0 3.60 2.14 11.82 0.00 0.00 12.00 4.95 8.00 2.28 Evansville 2010 34 0 3.55 2.76 22.46 6.00 2.04 13.00 6.11 9.00 1.82 Evansville 2011 34 0 2.72 2.34 10.11 6.00 2.43 13.00 3.77 9.00 1.92 Fairfield 2010 22 0 0.78 0.45 3.01 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.26 6.00 0.54 Fairfield 2011 39 0 1.48 1.54 3.23 6.00 2.54 13.00 1.63 7.00 1.07 FarinaWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 26 0 1.39 0.97 2.19 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.34 8.00 1.42 FarinaWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 31 0 1.44 1.41 3.17 6.00 1.97 11.00 1.31 8.00 1.39 FarinaWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 35 0 2.14 1.96 8.71 7.00 1.06 13.00 2.09 9.00 2.29 FarinaWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 36 0 4.02 3.35 9.52 8.00 4.99 14.00 4.04 9.00 2.62 FarinaWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 40 0 4.36 4.49 8.93 7.00 6.95 11.00 4.82 9.00 2.91 FarinaWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 33 0 5.19 4.48 8.21 6.00 4.26 10.00 5.73 8.00 4.71 FarinaWaterTreatment 2009 39 0 5.02 5.39 14.00 6.00 10.54 13.00 5.29 7.00 3.06 
17 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

PlantFarinaWaterTreatmentPlant 2010 41 0 4.62 4.25 8.05 6.00 3.87 13.00 5.86 9.00 2.91 FarinaWaterTreatmentPlant 2011 39 0 5.09 5.09 9.79 6.00 7.52 13.00 4.81 8.00 2.93 Flora WaterTreatmentPlant 2004 25 0 1.39 0.98 3.78 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.39 8.00 1.56 Flora WaterTreatmentPlant 2005 35 0 3.96 3.40 39.72 7.00 0.55 13.00 6.57 9.00 1.01 Flora WaterTreatmentPlant 2006 37 0 4.75 3.96 26.75 6.00 2.38 14.00 6.37 10.00 0.79 Flora WaterTreatmentPlant 2007 40 0 2.97 2.98 16.11 7.00 3.86 11.00 4.35 9.00 1.17 Flora WaterTreatmentPlant 2008 20 0 6.70 3.14 30.56 6.00 3.80 13.00 6.95 1.00 1.23 GillespieWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 27 0 1.07 0.83 1.81 0.00 0.00 13.00 0.69 8.00 1.36 GillespieWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 31 0 1.10 1.21 2.70 6.00 0.99 11.00 0.51 8.00 1.49 GillespieWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 35 0 0.68 0.67 2.26 7.00 0.67 13.00 0.69 9.00 0.85 GillespieWaterTreatment 2006 39 0 1.48 1.36 4.52 8.00 0.63 14.00 1.85 10.00 1.52 
18 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

PlantGillespieWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 33 0 2.55 2.36 3.59 7.00 2.72 11.00 2.97 9.00 2.04 GillespieWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 31 0 1.14 1.11 2.45 6.00 1.77 13.00 0.88 7.00 1.01 GillespieWaterTreatmentPlant 2009 7 0 3.37 0.95 3.86 6.00 3.07 1.00 0.42 0.00 0.00 GreenfieldWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 27 0 1.25 0.93 1.97 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.08 8.00 1.33 GreenfieldWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 31 0 0.96 0.99 3.45 6.00 1.51 11.00 0.60 8.00 1.16 GreenfieldWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 35 0 0.36 0.37 0.78 7.00 0.43 13.00 0.31 9.00 0.36 GreenfieldWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 31 0 0.11 0.12 0.76 8.00 0.15 12.00 0.06 10.00 0.12 HettickWaterSupply 2003 15 0 1.79 1.09 4.84 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.84 5.00 3.19 HettickWaterSupply Not enough data for 2004HighlandWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 27 0 0.59 0.43 1.91 0.00 0.00 13.00 0.83 8.00 0.44 
19 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

HighlandWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 31 0 0.25 0.26 0.43 6.00 0.27 11.00 0.20 8.00 0.29 HighlandWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 34 0 0.45 0.44 0.82 7.00 0.50 12.00 0.42 9.00 0.48 HighlandWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 32 0 0.08 0.10 0.46 9.00 0.15 13.00 0.05 8.00 0.05 Hillsboro Not enough data for 2006Hillsboro 2007 39 0 1.50 1.45 2.01 6.00 1.34 11.00 1.39 9.00 1.55 Hillsboro 2008 35 0 1.55 1.49 4.06 6.00 1.48 12.00 1.58 8.00 2.18 Hillsboro 2010 40 0 1.69 1.44 7.90 5.00 0.50 13.00 3.22 9.00 1.16 Hillsboro‐ GlennShoals 2003 20 0 2.04 1.15 4.57 0.00 0.00 8.00 2.01 9.00 1.64 Hillsboro‐ GlennShoals 2004 26 0 1.26 1.28 6.25 5.00 0.96 11.00 2.23 7.00 1.28 Hillsboro‐ GlennShoals 2005 23 0 1.55 1.31 3.79 5.00 0.40 10.00 1.91 5.00 1.73 Hillsboro‐ GlennShoals 2006 29 0 1.08 0.97 3.89 7.00 1.07 10.00 1.11 7.00 0.94 Hillsboro‐ GlennShoals 2009 40 0 1.62 1.66 4.79 6.00 2.21 13.00 1.98 8.00 1.41 Hillsboro‐ GlennShoals 2011 40 0 1.49 1.39 6.51 6.00 1.16 13.00 2.15 8.00 1.25 Hillsboro‐‐Lake Not enough data for 2007
20 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

HolidayShoresSanitaryDistrict 2003 24 0 2.34 1.60 3.16 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.75 8.00 2.43 HolidayShoresSanitaryDistrict 2004 31 0 2.38 2.29 3.36 6.00 1.78 11.00 2.30 8.00 2.51 HolidayShoresSanitaryDistrict 2005 35 0 1.46 1.42 5.59 7.00 1.93 13.00 1.68 9.00 1.23 HolidayShoresSanitaryDistrict 2006 32 0 0.99 0.79 3.92 8.00 1.46 13.00 0.67 10.00 0.84 KaskaskiaWaterDistrict 2003 27 0 1.86 1.22 6.78 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.25 8.00 1.42 KaskaskiaWaterDistrict 2004 31 0 1.30 1.13 8.00 6.00 0.72 11.00 2.48 8.00 0.83 KaskaskiaWaterDistrict 2005 35 0 1.66 1.34 17.90 7.00 0.51 13.00 3.19 9.00 0.93 KaskaskiaWaterDistrict 2006 39 0 1.16 1.04 6.95 8.00 1.34 14.00 1.85 10.00 0.54 KaskaskiaWaterDistrict 2007 33 0 1.38 1.28 5.90 7.00 1.27 11.00 2.53 9.00 0.79 KaskaskiaWaterDistrict 2008 30 0 1.06 0.88 2.88 6.00 0.95 12.00 1.30 8.00 0.83 KaskaskiaWaterDistrict 2009 34 0 1.61 1.47 3.22 6.00 1.89 13.00 1.98 8.00 1.07 KaskaskiaWater 2010 33 0 1.85 1.43 9.63 5.00 0.83 13.00 3.18 9.00 0.99 
21 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

DistrictKaskaskiaWaterDistrict 2011 34 0 1.54 1.39 4.09 6.00 1.78 13.00 1.96 9.00 1.08 Kinkaid AreaWaterSystem 2003 27 0 2.41 1.77 4.26 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.90 8.00 2.81 Kinkaid AreaWaterSystem 2004 31 0 2.49 2.30 5.67 6.00 1.71 11.00 2.62 8.00 2.80 Kinkaid AreaWaterSystem 2005 34 0 1.30 1.27 3.28 7.00 1.63 12.00 1.62 9.00 1.16 Kinkaid AreaWaterSystem 2006 39 0 0.69 0.57 3.20 9.00 0.79 13.00 0.54 10.00 0.59 Kinkaid AreaWaterSystem 2007 32 0 0.67 0.66 0.91 7.00 0.63 11.00 0.63 9.00 0.72 Kinkaid AreaWaterSystem 2008 32 0 0.78 0.73 1.26 6.00 0.53 13.00 0.72 8.00 0.99 Kinkaid AreaWaterSystem 2009 7 0 0.89 0.34 1.04 6.00 0.82 1.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 Mattoon Not enough data for 2006Mattoon 2007 24 0 0.88 0.61 2.17 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.10 8.00 0.66 Mattoon 2008 32 0 2.88 2.50 6.60 6.00 4.95 13.00 3.52 8.00 1.13 Mattoon 2009 32 0 5.09 4.92 19.84 6.00 9.86 12.00 2.96 7.00 2.82 Mattoon 2010 31 0 2.55 2.40 12.99 5.00 5.02 12.00 2.86 8.00 0.75 Mattoon 2011 34 0 2.21 2.03 6.96 6.00 3.04 13.00 2.61 9.00 0.95 Mt. OliveWaterWorks 2003 21 0 6.96 4.08 11.57 0.00 0.00 7.00 4.11 8.00 7.73 Mt. Olive 2004 31 0 2.55 2.50 5.20 6.00 2.99 11.00 2.88 8.00 2.55 
22 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

WaterWorksMt. OliveWaterWorks 2005 35 0 0.45 0.45 1.81 7.00 0.54 13.00 0.49 9.00 0.38 Mt. OliveWaterWorks 2006 41 0 2.73 2.71 11.86 9.00 1.85 14.00 2.25 11.00 4.01 Mt. OliveWaterWorks 2007 33 0 3.14 3.03 6.36 7.00 1.86 11.00 3.58 9.00 3.98 Mt. OliveWaterWorks 2008 32 0 3.53 2.87 17.68 6.00 2.79 13.00 3.85 8.00 3.75 Mt. OliveWaterWorks 2009 34 0 1.72 1.56 4.71 6.00 0.94 13.00 1.77 8.00 2.37 Mt. OliveWaterWorks 2010 34 0 0.78 0.73 1.27 6.00 0.57 13.00 0.83 9.00 0.79 Mt. OliveWaterWorks 2011 35 0 0.80 0.74 1.68 6.00 0.55 13.00 0.82 10.00 0.95 NashvilleWater Plant 2003 19 0 0.12 0.14 0.18 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.14 8.00 0.12 NashvilleWater Plant 2004 31 0 0.23 0.23 0.43 6.00 0.33 11.00 0.22 8.00 0.19 NashvilleWater Plant 2005 35 0 0.38 0.39 0.77 7.00 0.50 13.00 0.29 9.00 0.39 NashvilleWater Plant 2006 41 0 0.21 0.19 0.92 9.00 0.09 14.00 0.34 10.00 0.12 NashvilleWater Plant 2007 33 0 0.57 0.56 0.83 7.00 0.55 11.00 0.61 9.00 0.62 NashvilleWater Plant 2008 31 0 0.41 0.40 0.66 5.00 0.51 13.00 0.40 8.00 0.38 NashvilleWater Plant 2009 15 0 0.46 0.27 0.86 6.00 0.33 9.00 0.42 0.00 0.00 New Berlin Not enough data for 2003
23 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

New Berlin 2004 27 0 0.53 0.50 0.90 4.00 0.58 10.00 0.59 8.00 0.50 New Berlin 2005 34 0 0.44 0.41 1.71 7.00 0.34 13.00 0.54 9.00 0.39 New Berlin 2006 31 0 0.26 0.23 1.08 6.00 0.12 13.00 0.16 10.00 0.46 New Berlin 2007 28 0 0.50 0.52 0.80 5.00 0.58 10.00 0.51 9.00 0.53 New Berlin 2008 19 0 0.66 0.60 1.17 4.00 0.52 10.00 0.69 3.00 0.68 New Berlin 2009 26 0 0.76 0.70 1.31 6.00 0.41 12.00 0.76 5.00 0.98 New Berlin 2010 25 0 0.63 0.60 1.47 5.00 0.53 11.00 0.74 3.00 0.57 New Berlin 2011 33 0 0.83 0.78 1.13 6.00 0.50 12.00 0.90 9.00 0.89 Otter LakeWaterCommission 2003 24 0 1.31 0.89 4.16 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.23 7.00 1.13 Otter LakeWaterCommission 2004 31 0 0.89 0.86 1.38 6.00 0.91 11.00 0.91 8.00 1.00 Otter LakeWaterCommission 2005 34 0 0.86 0.72 4.06 7.00 0.49 13.00 1.27 8.00 0.71 Otter LakeWaterCommission 2006 32 0 0.19 0.18 2.23 9.00 0.43 11.00 0.07 11.00 0.07 Palmyra‐ModestoWaterCommission 2003 18 0 2.72 1.55 5.42 0.00 0.00 5.00 2.27 8.00 1.53 Palmyra‐ModestoWaterCommission 2004 30 0 1.97 1.91 3.40 6.00 2.49 10.00 2.09 8.00 1.73 Palmyra‐ModestoWaterCommission 2005 34 0 0.60 0.58 1.63 7.00 0.62 12.00 0.59 9.00 0.67 Palmyra‐ModestoWater 2006 34 0 0.58 0.38 4.54 9.00 0.51 13.00 0.26 11.00 0.59 
24 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

CommissionParis Not enough data for 2003Paris 2004 31 0 0.98 0.95 3.22 6.00 0.34 11.00 0.55 8.00 2.00 Paris 2005 33 0 0.43 0.41 0.96 6.00 0.40 12.00 0.36 9.00 0.49 Paris 2006 39 0 1.11 1.05 7.29 8.00 0.63 14.00 1.56 10.00 1.40 Paris 2007 30 0 0.70 0.64 2.22 6.00 0.81 10.00 0.76 9.00 0.51 Paris 2008 30 0 1.35 1.14 3.75 6.00 1.06 12.00 1.13 8.00 1.48 Paris 2009 26 0 1.25 0.96 5.26 6.00 0.60 11.00 1.69 6.00 0.95 Paris Not enough data for 2010Patoka‐‐ EastReservoir 2006 18 0 2.40 1.41 15.40 3.00 3.86 13.00 0.91 2.00 0.71 Patoka‐‐ NForkKaskaskiaRiver 2006 18 0 2.71 1.58 17.87 3.00 4.40 13.00 1.02 2.00 0.75 Patoka‐‐WestReservoir 2006 17 0 0.49 0.29 1.12 2.00 0.27 13.00 0.44 2.00 0.27 PittsfieldWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 25 0 1.49 1.14 3.31 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.74 8.00 1.95 PittsfieldWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 31 0 0.99 0.97 2.37 6.00 1.26 11.00 0.95 8.00 0.89 PittsfieldWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 34 0 0.38 0.38 0.59 7.00 0.43 12.00 0.31 9.00 0.41 PittsfieldWaterTreatment 2006 34 0 0.16 0.12 1.85 10.00 0.10 12.00 0.09 11.00 0.15 
25 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

PlantSalemWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 24 0 0.90 0.59 3.33 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.88 7.00 0.76 SalemWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 31 0 0.61 0.58 1.18 6.00 0.35 11.00 0.60 8.00 0.90 SalemWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 35 0 1.02 0.94 4.24 7.00 0.50 13.00 1.02 9.00 0.97 SalemWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 34 0 1.62 1.28 10.13 9.00 3.82 13.00 1.07 11.00 0.06 SpringfieldCity Water,Light, andPower 2003 25 0 2.23 1.76 3.65 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.92 8.00 2.81 SpringfieldCity Water,Light, andPower 2004 31 0 1.55 1.55 2.93 6.00 1.61 11.00 0.91 8.00 2.10 SpringfieldCity Water,Light, andPower 2005 35 0 0.72 0.74 1.44 7.00 0.82 13.00 0.49 9.00 1.03 SpringfieldCity Water,Light, andPower 2006 34 0 0.69 0.59 3.34 9.00 0.77 13.00 0.35 11.00 1.03 VermontWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 25 0 0.60 0.44 1.54 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.79 8.00 0.40 VermontWater 2004 31 0 0.26 0.27 0.59 6.00 0.42 11.00 0.18 8.00 0.22 
26 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

TreatmentPlantVermontWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 35 0 0.52 0.51 0.69 7.00 0.53 13.00 0.49 9.00 0.53 VermontWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 41 0 0.21 0.20 1.54 9.00 0.34 14.00 0.12 11.00 0.08 VermontWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 33 0 0.93 0.85 2.86 7.00 0.39 11.00 1.33 9.00 0.95 VermontWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 32 0 0.47 0.44 0.89 7.00 0.47 13.00 0.45 7.00 0.54 VermontWaterTreatmentPlant 2009 34 0 1.55 1.30 8.90 6.00 0.33 13.00 2.37 8.00 1.01 VermontWaterTreatmentPlant 2010 34 0 1.23 0.98 9.43 6.00 0.70 13.00 2.50 9.00 0.39 VermontWaterTreatmentPlant 2011 34 0 1.10 0.91 4.63 6.00 0.35 13.00 1.71 9.00 0.84 Wayne CitySkillet Creek 2003 25 0 0.65 0.51 1.02 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.46 8.00 0.75 Wayne CitySkillet Creek 2004 30 0 1.05 1.05 2.25 6.00 0.91 11.00 0.62 8.00 1.67 Wayne CitySkillet Creek 2005 35 0 1.03 0.98 2.20 7.00 0.73 13.00 1.06 9.00 1.38 Wayne CitySkillet Creek 2006 40 0 0.98 0.91 2.32 9.00 1.03 13.00 0.86 11.00 1.10 Wayne City 2007 33 0 1.56 1.51 2.36 7.00 1.53 11.00 1.62 9.00 1.59 
27 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Skillet CreekWayne CitySkillet Creek 2008 29 0 1.89 1.80 3.41 6.00 1.57 11.00 1.31 7.00 2.53 Wayne CitySkillet Creek 2009 15 0 2.41 1.14 3.58 6.00 2.79 9.00 1.47 0.00 0.00 Wayne CitySkillet Creek 1899 1 0 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wayne CitySkillet Creek 2003 25 0 0.65 0.51 1.02 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.46 8.00 0.75 Wayne CitySkillet Creek Not enough data for 2006BatesvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 24 0 2.45 1.88 5.18 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.05 8.00 3.76 BatesvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 31 0 1.72 1.72 3.17 6.00 1.22 11.00 0.70 8.00 2.86 BatesvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 35 0 1.10 1.10 3.58 7.00 1.58 13.00 0.73 9.00 1.31 BatesvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 41 0 1.17 1.18 3.51 9.00 0.80 14.00 0.49 11.00 2.30 BatesvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 33 0 0.76 0.76 1.41 7.00 1.11 11.00 0.71 9.00 0.72 BatesvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 32 0 1.86 1.61 4.76 6.00 1.32 12.00 1.54 9.00 2.25 BatesvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2009 33 0 1.31 1.24 2.42 5.00 1.72 13.00 1.43 8.00 1.04 
28 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

BatesvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2010 31 0 2.25 1.93 3.89 3.00 1.65 13.00 2.71 9.00 2.19 BatesvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2011 35 0 0.60 0.58 1.13 7.00 0.93 13.00 0.56 9.00 0.41 BedfordWaterDepartment 2003 23 0 2.63 1.37 28.36 0.00 0.00 11.00 4.20 8.00 0.76 BedfordWaterDepartment 2004 31 0 0.81 0.79 6.43 6.00 0.29 11.00 2.32 8.00 0.37 BedfordWaterDepartment 2005 34 0 0.99 0.80 6.17 6.00 0.53 13.00 1.67 9.00 0.61 BedfordWaterDepartment 2006 41 0 1.13 0.96 9.76 9.00 0.87 14.00 1.96 11.00 0.82 BedfordWaterDepartment 2007 33 0 0.53 0.47 3.79 7.00 0.39 11.00 0.76 9.00 0.38 BedfordWaterDepartment 2008 32 0 0.80 0.63 5.36 6.00 0.37 13.00 1.30 8.00 0.53 BedfordWaterDepartment 2009 34 0 0.62 0.54 2.52 6.00 0.39 13.00 0.98 8.00 0.41 BedfordWaterDepartment 2010 34 0 0.80 0.65 4.43 6.00 0.40 13.00 1.39 9.00 0.44 BedfordWaterDepartment 2011 139 0 1.02 0.65 6.82 6.00 0.37 91.00 1.23 36.00 0.51 Fort Wayne‐Three RiverFiltrationPlant 2003 24 0 1.09 0.71 5.50 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.49 8.00 0.83 
29 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Fort Wayne‐Three RiverFiltrationPlant 2004 31 0 1.05 0.92 4.40 6.00 0.30 11.00 1.86 8.00 1.19 Fort Wayne‐Three RiverFiltrationPlant 2005 33 0 0.79 0.70 2.59 7.00 0.46 11.00 1.03 9.00 0.95 Fort Wayne‐Three RiverFiltrationPlant 2006 36 0 0.69 0.54 3.32 9.00 0.44 9.00 0.79 11.00 0.72 Fort Wayne‐Three RiverFiltrationPlant 2007 33 0 0.88 0.77 4.11 7.00 0.51 11.00 1.41 9.00 0.75 Fort Wayne‐Three RiverFiltrationPlant 2008 30 0 1.14 0.82 7.13 6.00 0.35 11.00 1.57 8.00 0.92 Fort Wayne‐Three RiverFiltrationPlant 2009 8 0 0.49 0.28 1.20 6.00 0.37 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.22 INpolis‐‐Eagle CreekWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 23 0 1.58 1.16 4.43 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.50 7.00 2.02 INpolis‐‐Eagle CreekWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 31 0 1.22 1.18 2.56 6.00 0.47 11.00 0.76 8.00 1.92 INpolis‐‐Eagle CreekWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 35 0 1.59 1.45 5.60 7.00 0.47 13.00 1.97 9.00 2.73 
30 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

INpolis‐‐Eagle CreekWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 37 0 0.60 0.62 2.82 9.00 0.62 12.00 0.17 10.00 0.74 JasperMunicipalWater 2003 25 0 0.94 0.59 7.43 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.49 8.00 0.47 JasperMunicipalWater 2004 31 0 0.55 0.52 2.04 6.00 0.33 11.00 0.67 8.00 0.63 JasperMunicipalWater 2005 34 0 0.54 0.49 1.75 7.00 0.47 13.00 0.67 9.00 0.48 JasperMunicipalWater 2006 41 0 0.33 0.28 2.98 9.00 0.35 14.00 0.60 11.00 0.08 JasperMunicipalWater 2007 33 0 0.43 0.41 1.02 7.00 0.38 11.00 0.51 9.00 0.39 JasperMunicipalWater 2008 32 0 0.40 0.37 1.16 6.00 0.32 13.00 0.48 8.00 0.36 JasperMunicipalWater 2009 7 0 0.38 0.21 0.40 6.00 0.35 1.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 Logansport Not enough data for 2003Logansport 2004 31 0 1.23 1.03 10.59 6.00 0.37 11.00 2.41 8.00 0.97 Logansport 2005 34 0 1.15 0.90 13.97 7.00 0.50 13.00 2.02 8.00 0.79 Logansport 2006 39 0 1.88 1.70 19.95 8.00 2.56 14.00 3.05 10.00 0.57 Logansport 2007 33 0 0.69 0.63 2.51 7.00 0.59 11.00 0.96 9.00 0.51 Logansport 2008 31 0 2.11 1.43 26.87 6.00 0.56 13.00 4.00 8.00 0.85 Logansport 2009 34 0 0.92 0.76 5.23 6.00 0.51 13.00 1.59 8.00 0.52 Logansport 2010 34 0 1.43 1.08 7.43 6.00 0.39 13.00 2.94 9.00 0.62 
31 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Logansport 2011 34 0 1.30 1.00 16.05 6.00 0.50 13.00 2.44 9.00 0.54 Logansport 1899 1 0 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Logansport 2006 35 0 1.38 1.02 19.95 7.00 0.36 13.00 2.98 9.00 0.55 Logansport 2010 34 0 1.43 1.08 7.43 6.00 0.39 13.00 2.94 9.00 0.62 MitchellWater Plant 2005 26 0 2.17 1.59 15.36 0.00 0.00 11.00 5.19 9.00 0.62 MitchellWater Plant 2006 38 0 1.90 1.56 21.04 8.00 0.51 14.00 4.44 10.00 0.50 MitchellWater Plant 2007 30 0 0.87 0.70 3.09 6.00 0.61 11.00 1.13 8.00 0.68 MitchellWater Plant 2008 27 0 1.33 1.00 7.31 6.00 0.67 11.00 2.15 7.00 0.87 MitchellWater Plant 2009 28 0 0.79 0.57 3.82 2.00 0.32 12.00 1.22 6.00 0.39 MitchellWater Plant 2010 17 0 1.76 0.81 7.15 5.00 0.35 11.00 2.59 1.00 0.18 NorthVernon Not enough data for 2006NorthVernon 2007 18 0 1.65 0.97 4.03 0.00 0.00 5.00 1.13 8.00 1.75 NorthVernon 2008 28 0 2.36 1.71 11.19 7.00 1.20 11.00 3.01 6.00 1.81 NorthVernon 2009 33 0 2.72 2.11 14.27 6.00 0.83 13.00 4.19 7.00 1.43 NorthVernon 2010 36 0 2.26 1.90 8.76 6.00 1.27 13.00 3.70 11.00 1.10 NorthVernon 2011 139 0 2.62 1.85 24.67 6.00 1.22 91.00 3.33 36.00 0.88 SanteeUtilities Inc. 2003 21 0 2.76 1.84 7.01 0.00 0.00 7.00 1.91 8.00 3.63 SanteeUtilities Inc. 2004 31 0 1.89 1.86 6.40 6.00 0.44 11.00 2.53 8.00 2.59 SanteeUtilities Inc. 2005 35 0 2.45 1.80 15.87 7.00 0.44 13.00 5.86 9.00 0.53 SanteeUtilities Inc. 2006 39 0 0.75 0.62 3.59 9.00 1.16 13.00 0.46 11.00 0.71 
32 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

SanteeUtilities Inc. 1899 1 0 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SanteeUtilities Inc. 2005 35 0 2.45 1.80 15.87 7.00 0.44 13.00 5.86 9.00 0.53 Stucker ForkWater Utility 2003 24 0 1.15 1.00 14.47 0.00 0.00 9.00 3.08 9.00 0.50 Stucker ForkWater Utility 2004 31 0 0.99 1.26 11.83 6.00 0.30 11.00 3.62 8.00 0.76 Stucker ForkWater Utility 2005 32 0 1.37 1.03 10.77 6.00 0.49 12.00 2.55 9.00 0.67 Stucker ForkWater Utility 2006 40 0 1.83 1.16 11.55 9.00 0.36 13.00 2.80 10.00 0.73 Stucker ForkWater Utility 2007 38 0 0.62 0.60 4.14 7.00 0.47 10.00 1.17 9.00 0.39 Stucker ForkWater Utility 2008 36 0 1.37 1.07 11.02 7.00 0.39 13.00 2.77 7.00 0.85 Stucker ForkWater Utility 2009 37 0 0.51 0.47 2.19 6.00 0.33 13.00 0.74 6.00 0.47 Stucker ForkWater Utility 2010 37 0 1.01 0.88 13.01 5.00 0.35 13.00 1.90 6.00 0.77 Stucker ForkWater Utility 2011 38 0 0.84 0.76 6.66 6.00 0.36 12.00 1.33 7.00 0.74 VersaillesWaterWorks 2003 25 0 4.54 2.51 42.60 0.00 0.00 11.00 6.59 10.00 2.39 VersaillesWaterWorks 2004 29 0 3.58 3.52 31.39 5.00 0.49 11.00 10.52 8.00 2.45 VersaillesWaterWorks 2005 35 0 6.49 4.71 36.82 7.00 0.31 13.00 13.68 9.00 3.57 VersaillesWaterWorks 2006 33 0 2.01 1.75 26.25 9.00 4.24 11.00 0.91 9.00 1.49 VersaillesWaterWorks 2007 31 0 0.43 0.43 0.73 6.00 0.48 11.00 0.39 8.00 0.51 VersaillesWater 2008 29 0 0.44 0.41 0.93 6.00 0.33 12.00 0.40 6.00 0.39 
33 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

WorksVersaillesWaterWorks 2009 29 0 0.58 0.50 3.41 6.00 0.36 12.00 0.85 5.00 0.44 VersaillesWaterWorks 2010 31 0 0.41 0.38 0.59 5.00 0.33 13.00 0.44 7.00 0.40 VersaillesWaterWorks 2011 33 0 0.39 0.38 0.50 6.00 0.35 12.00 0.38 9.00 0.41 WestportWaterCompany 2003 22 0 2.32 1.50 25.92 0.00 0.00 10.00 2.18 7.00 1.36 WestportWaterCompany 2004 29 0 1.26 1.13 2.53 5.00 0.65 11.00 1.61 7.00 1.18 WestportWaterCompany 2005 32 0 0.98 0.84 3.37 6.00 0.69 12.00 1.26 9.00 0.89 WestportWaterCompany 2006 38 0 2.03 2.03 23.43 7.00 0.66 13.00 2.01 11.00 0.84 WestportWaterCompany 2007 32 0 1.15 1.04 4.13 7.00 0.80 11.00 1.36 8.00 1.12 WestportWaterCompany 2008 30 0 0.92 0.85 1.57 5.00 0.75 13.00 0.83 8.00 1.05 WestportWaterCompany 2009 27 0 0.80 0.67 1.18 3.00 0.34 11.00 0.73 7.00 0.99 WestportWaterCompany 2010 32 0 1.08 1.04 1.87 6.00 0.60 13.00 1.07 9.00 1.38 WestportWaterCompany 2011 34 0 1.24 1.23 2.47 6.00 0.65 13.00 0.92 9.00 2.09 Winslow 2003 24 0 2.57 1.45 24.61 0.00 0.00 11.00 4.22 8.00 1.08 
34 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

WaterWorksWinslowWaterWorks 2004 31 0 1.82 1.30 12.60 6.00 0.31 11.00 3.79 8.00 0.72 WinslowWaterWorks 2005 32 0 1.29 1.02 10.66 7.00 0.38 13.00 2.30 8.00 1.02 WinslowWaterWorks 2006 39 0 2.20 1.96 18.46 7.00 2.02 14.00 4.40 11.00 1.29 WinslowWaterWorks 2007 32 0 0.63 0.56 2.04 7.00 0.45 11.00 1.00 9.00 0.51 WinslowWaterWorks 2008 33 0 0.81 0.67 5.30 7.00 0.52 13.00 1.32 8.00 0.48 WinslowWaterWorks 2009 34 0 1.14 0.88 7.33 6.00 0.34 13.00 1.95 8.00 0.82 WinslowWaterWorks 2010 32 0 1.47 1.05 7.48 4.00 0.34 13.00 2.91 9.00 0.56 WinslowWaterWorks 2011 33 0 0.59 0.50 2.14 6.00 0.36 13.00 0.73 8.00 0.55 Altoona 2004 17 0 0.79 0.49 2.85 0.00 0.00 5.00 1.18 6.00 0.44 Altoona 2005 33 0 0.70 0.65 4.97 7.00 0.61 11.00 1.15 9.00 0.48 Altoona 2006 41 0 1.02 0.78 13.09 9.00 0.49 14.00 2.30 11.00 0.26 Altoona 2007 27 0 0.72 0.59 3.19 7.00 0.49 11.00 1.02 3.00 0.48 Altoona 2008 31 0 1.04 0.74 6.43 6.00 0.41 13.00 1.84 8.00 0.41 Altoona 2009 30 0 0.65 0.50 2.12 6.00 0.33 13.00 1.01 7.00 0.43 Atchison Not enough data for 2003Atchison 2004 31 0 0.74 0.63 2.91 6.00 0.38 11.00 1.12 8.00 0.75 
35 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Atchison 2005 31 0 1.37 0.96 10.58 6.00 0.40 13.00 2.42 8.00 0.68 Atchison 2006 38 0 0.43 0.29 4.15 7.00 0.46 14.00 0.36 10.00 0.12 Atchison 2007 33 0 0.77 0.75 3.48 7.00 0.41 11.00 1.65 9.00 0.54 Atchison 2008 32 0 1.34 0.99 7.19 7.00 0.43 12.00 2.47 8.00 0.68 Atchison 2009 34 0 0.93 0.76 8.58 6.00 0.36 13.00 1.78 8.00 0.51 Atchison 2010 34 0 1.43 1.12 5.28 6.00 0.45 13.00 2.52 9.00 1.04 Atchison 2011 131 0 0.44 0.42 0.99 6.00 0.42 90.00 0.45 29.00 0.39 BaxterSpringsWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 28 0 1.30 0.81 14.10 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.31 9.00 0.41 BaxterSpringsWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 37 0 0.45 0.28 6.87 7.00 0.05 14.00 0.70 9.00 0.11 BaxterSpringsWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 33 0 1.10 0.99 7.39 7.00 0.39 11.00 2.72 9.00 0.52 BaxterSpringsWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 33 0 0.82 0.60 12.06 7.00 0.34 13.00 1.41 8.00 0.37 BaxterSpringsWaterTreatmentPlant 2009 33 0 0.43 0.40 1.03 6.00 0.33 13.00 0.52 8.00 0.41 BaxterSpringsWater 2010 33 0 1.12 0.85 12.72 5.00 0.32 13.00 2.24 8.00 0.49 
36 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

TreatmentPlantBaxterSpringsWaterTreatmentPlant 2011 32 0 1.27 0.93 12.04 6.00 0.36 12.00 2.51 9.00 0.49 Beloit WaterDepartment 2003 21 0 2.04 1.44 5.36 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.64 8.00 2.12 Beloit WaterDepartment 2004 30 0 1.76 1.66 4.11 6.00 1.46 11.00 1.55 7.00 2.13 Beloit WaterDepartment 2005 35 0 2.88 2.30 37.22 7.00 1.37 13.00 5.61 9.00 1.67 Beloit WaterDepartment 2006 40 0 1.07 0.88 14.26 9.00 0.56 14.00 1.24 9.00 0.88 Beloit WaterDepartment 2007 32 0 2.42 2.26 11.62 7.00 1.48 11.00 5.13 9.00 1.47 Beloit WaterDepartment 2008 29 0 4.29 3.10 46.16 5.00 1.73 12.00 7.35 7.00 1.97 Beloit WaterDepartment 2009 34 0 1.54 1.42 8.52 6.00 1.17 13.00 2.04 8.00 1.22 Beloit WaterDepartment 2010 34 0 1.82 1.68 7.41 6.00 1.33 13.00 2.03 9.00 1.94 Beloit WaterDepartment 2011 34 0 2.07 1.87 4.77 6.00 1.26 13.00 2.00 9.00 2.59 BurlingtonCity WaterWorks 2003 21 0 2.29 1.48 3.67 0.00 0.00 7.00 2.16 8.00 2.42 BurlingtonCity WaterWorks 2004 31 0 1.14 1.05 3.29 6.00 0.83 11.00 1.32 8.00 1.51 BurlingtonCity WaterWorks 2005 33 0 1.06 0.99 3.97 7.00 0.47 11.00 2.00 9.00 1.07 BurlingtonCity WaterWorks 2006 41 0 0.98 0.91 5.10 9.00 0.85 13.00 0.85 12.00 1.15 BurlingtonCity Water 2007 31 0 0.89 0.86 1.88 7.00 0.79 10.00 1.05 8.00 1.00 
37 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

WorksBurlingtonCity WaterWorks 2008 31 0 1.45 1.14 3.77 6.00 1.05 13.00 2.27 8.00 0.94 BurlingtonCity WaterWorks 2009 34 0 0.89 0.76 2.23 6.00 0.53 13.00 1.00 8.00 1.05 BurlingtonCity WaterWorks 2010 34 0 1.66 1.31 9.44 6.00 0.45 13.00 2.91 9.00 1.34 BurlingtonCity WaterWorks 2011 33 0 1.47 1.37 2.78 6.00 0.71 12.00 1.30 9.00 2.03 CaneyWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 25 0 0.54 0.40 2.32 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.70 8.00 0.37 CaneyWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 36 0 0.90 0.65 21.05 6.00 0.05 14.00 2.15 9.00 0.32 CaneyWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 33 0 0.44 0.40 1.98 7.00 0.40 11.00 0.54 9.00 0.35 CaneyWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 28 0 0.44 0.38 1.36 6.00 0.32 12.00 0.51 8.00 0.39 CaneyWaterTreatmentPlant 2009 32 0 0.46 0.40 3.56 5.00 0.30 13.00 0.63 8.00 0.35 CaneyWaterTreatmentPlant 2010 22 0 0.44 0.41 1.12 4.00 0.37 12.00 0.55 3.00 0.38 CaneyWater 2011 34 0 0.68 0.58 4.75 6.00 0.35 13.00 1.15 9.00 0.44 
38 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

TreatmentPlantChanute 2006 26 0 0.58 0.51 1.86 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.00 9.00 0.44 Chanute 2007 31 0 1.10 0.93 5.24 7.00 0.59 10.00 1.68 8.00 0.82 Chanute 2008 31 0 1.40 1.04 7.36 7.00 0.73 12.00 2.63 8.00 0.52 Chanute 2009 34 0 0.77 0.63 2.23 6.00 0.46 13.00 0.90 8.00 0.72 Chanute 2010 33 0 1.92 1.61 10.52 6.00 0.84 12.00 4.45 9.00 0.76 Chanute 2011 34 0 1.25 1.06 6.59 6.00 0.63 13.00 2.02 9.00 0.75 Chetopa Not enough data for 2006Chetopa 2007 17 0 1.59 0.81 4.98 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.83 4.00 0.87 Chetopa 2008 23 0 1.30 1.11 7.21 7.00 0.88 6.00 2.54 7.00 0.79 Chetopa 2009 28 0 0.80 0.64 2.89 6.00 0.49 11.00 1.24 7.00 0.53 Chetopa 2010 27 0 1.63 1.14 10.51 3.00 0.55 11.00 2.70 8.00 0.91 Chetopa 2011 30 0 1.63 1.40 9.05 4.00 0.52 10.00 2.78 10.00 0.67 City ofCarbondale 2003 23 0 2.39 1.62 3.72 0.00 0.00 9.00 2.32 8.00 1.60 City ofCarbondale 2004 25 0 1.46 1.50 3.22 5.00 2.15 10.00 2.05 4.00 1.49 City ofCarbondale 2005 31 0 1.20 1.06 3.74 7.00 0.32 10.00 0.68 9.00 2.23 City ofCarbondale 2006 42 0 1.50 1.40 3.20 9.00 0.97 14.00 1.82 12.00 1.58 City ofCarbondale 2007 31 0 1.83 1.80 3.65 7.00 2.01 10.00 1.38 8.00 2.42 City ofCarbondale 2008 28 0 1.22 1.01 3.19 6.00 1.58 12.00 1.46 7.00 0.70 City ofCarbondale 2009 7 0 0.38 0.21 0.47 6.00 0.34 1.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 City ofEmporia 2003 24 0 1.30 0.87 3.34 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.10 8.00 1.95 City ofEmporia 2004 31 0 0.57 0.48 2.47 6.00 0.33 11.00 0.54 8.00 0.74 
39 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

City ofEmporia 2005 34 0 0.75 0.63 2.14 7.00 0.56 13.00 0.98 9.00 0.65 City ofEmporia 2006 40 0 0.33 0.26 2.07 9.00 0.19 14.00 0.30 11.00 0.40 City ofEmporia 2007 34 0 0.78 0.71 2.35 7.00 0.44 12.00 1.18 9.00 0.57 City ofEmporia 2008 30 0 0.76 0.65 3.43 6.00 0.62 12.00 0.95 8.00 0.64 City ofEmporia 2009 34 0 0.74 0.69 3.03 6.00 0.40 13.00 0.91 8.00 0.79 City ofEmporia 2010 34 0 0.80 0.69 2.55 6.00 0.43 13.00 0.85 9.00 0.97 City ofEmporia 2011 34 0 0.79 0.73 1.85 6.00 0.59 13.00 0.89 9.00 0.76 City ofOsawatomie 2003 21 0 1.78 0.98 6.95 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.83 8.00 0.95 City ofOsawatomie 2004 31 0 1.68 1.71 11.82 6.00 0.73 11.00 4.17 8.00 1.37 City ofOsawatomie 2005 34 0 1.64 1.38 15.97 7.00 0.65 12.00 2.79 9.00 1.61 City ofOsawatomie 2006 41 0 1.45 1.20 6.56 10.00 1.03 14.00 1.49 10.00 1.49 City ofOsawatomie 2007 32 0 1.29 1.18 3.08 6.00 1.10 11.00 1.85 9.00 0.94 City ofOsawatomie 2008 32 0 1.80 1.42 10.42 6.00 1.15 13.00 2.73 8.00 1.22 City ofOsawatomie 2009 34 0 1.47 1.22 5.39 6.00 0.72 13.00 2.45 8.00 1.12 City ofOsawatomie 2010 32 0 1.85 1.39 11.14 5.00 0.44 13.00 3.28 9.00 1.10 City ofOsawatomie 2011 138 0 2.32 1.54 17.21 6.00 0.93 90.00 2.93 36.00 1.04 City ofValley Falls 2003 21 0 2.24 1.60 9.59 0.00 0.00 7.00 4.82 8.00 1.19 City ofValley Falls 2004 31 0 1.15 1.02 3.08 6.00 0.81 11.00 1.92 8.00 0.97 City ofValley Falls 2005 35 0 1.84 1.43 8.50 7.00 0.87 13.00 3.46 9.00 0.98 
40 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

City ofValley Falls 2006 41 0 1.19 1.00 4.56 9.00 1.15 14.00 1.71 11.00 0.58 City ofValley Falls 2007 33 0 1.29 1.19 3.49 7.00 1.12 11.00 2.16 9.00 0.92 City ofValley Falls 2008 32 0 1.77 1.45 4.33 7.00 2.09 12.00 2.29 8.00 1.00 City ofValley Falls 2009 7 0 0.69 0.28 1.15 6.00 0.56 1.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 Coffeyville 2011 25 0 2.52 1.46 18.50 0.00 0.00 10.00 4.09 9.00 0.94 EllsworthRWD #1 2003 20 0 1.30 0.87 2.12 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.52 8.00 1.66 EllsworthRWD #1 2004 30 0 1.37 1.35 2.46 5.00 1.36 11.00 1.07 8.00 1.80 EllsworthRWD #1 2005 34 0 0.89 0.88 1.68 7.00 1.22 13.00 0.85 8.00 0.94 EllsworthRWD #1 2006 41 0 0.31 0.29 1.47 8.00 0.32 15.00 0.23 11.00 0.26 EllsworthRWD #1 2007 29 0 1.07 1.08 1.95 7.00 0.65 9.00 0.92 9.00 1.35 EllsworthRWD #1 2008 31 0 1.42 1.20 4.46 6.00 1.05 12.00 1.63 8.00 1.07 EllsworthRWD #1 2009 32 0 0.87 0.84 1.42 6.00 1.01 13.00 0.80 7.00 0.85 EllsworthRWD #1 2010 34 0 1.56 1.46 3.62 6.00 0.70 13.00 1.20 9.00 2.39 EllsworthRWD #1 2011 34 0 1.31 1.27 1.57 6.00 1.25 13.00 1.23 9.00 1.41 Erie Not enough data for 2003Erie 2004 31 0 1.62 1.32 14.29 6.00 0.78 11.00 2.85 8.00 1.23 Erie 2005 33 0 1.34 1.24 10.96 7.00 0.44 11.00 3.17 9.00 0.97 Erie 2006 41 0 1.25 1.12 6.59 9.00 1.39 14.00 1.52 11.00 0.77 Erie 2007 31 0 1.31 1.11 5.62 7.00 0.84 11.00 2.09 8.00 0.91 Erie 2008 31 0 1.73 1.29 7.28 7.00 1.03 12.00 2.91 8.00 0.93 Erie 2009 33 0 0.88 0.73 2.48 5.00 0.61 13.00 1.33 8.00 0.62 
41 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Erie 2010 34 0 1.29 1.09 8.19 6.00 0.94 13.00 2.30 9.00 0.70 Erie 2011 34 0 1.11 0.94 5.51 6.00 0.70 13.00 1.69 9.00 0.78 FranklinCounty RWD

#6 Not enough data for 2003

FranklinCounty RWD

#6 2004 31 0 1.47 1.33 4.03 6.00 0.85 11.00 2.57 8.00 1.26 

FranklinCounty RWD

#6 2005 34 0 1.42 1.23 6.15 7.00 0.69 12.00 2.18 9.00 1.58 

FranklinCounty RWD

#6 2006 39 0 1.05 0.99 4.50 9.00 1.33 14.00 1.25 10.00 0.91 

FranklinCounty RWD

#6 2007 32 0 0.81 0.78 1.60 7.00 0.76 11.00 0.94 8.00 0.75 

FranklinCounty RWD

#6 2008 31 0 1.20 0.94 4.47 6.00 0.72 13.00 1.67 8.00 0.95 

FranklinCounty RWD

#6 2009 33 0 0.85 0.75 2.37 6.00 0.52 13.00 1.13 7.00 0.83 

FranklinCounty RWD

#6 2010 34 0 1.40 1.17 6.49 6.00 0.45 13.00 2.11 9.00 1.22 

FranklinCounty RWD

#6 2011 34 0 1.38 1.25 3.82 6.00 0.90 13.00 1.64 9.00 1.35 

Harveyville 2006 22 0 0.92 0.62 1.59 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.64 7.00 0.98 Harveyville 2007 14 0 0.75 0.76 1.31 4.00 1.20 2.00 0.84 5.00 0.56 Harveyville 2008 5 0 0.38 0.21 0.44 5.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Herington 2011 25 0 1.18 0.82 1.44 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.98 9.00 1.13 Howard 2010 17 0 0.58 0.34 1.33 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.28 9.00 0.45 Howard 2011 32 0 0.48 0.53 1.65 5.00 0.56 11.00 0.49 10.00 0.37 
42 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Humboldt 2011 16 0 1.16 0.64 1.63 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.23 9.00 1.14 Iola 2009 23 0 0.73 0.52 1.59 1.00 0.18 7.00 0.81 8.00 0.72 Iola 2010 34 0 1.29 1.03 7.41 6.00 0.57 13.00 2.31 9.00 0.73 Iola 2011 139 0 1.39 1.08 5.63 6.00 0.66 91.00 1.57 36.00 1.06 KickapooTribalWaterworks 2009 8 0 0.72 0.31 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.23 KickapooTribalWaterworks 2010 22 0 2.49 1.44 9.42 2.00 0.36 6.00 3.65 10.00 1.06 KickapooTribalWaterworks 2011 29 0 1.46 1.28 2.79 3.00 1.05 12.00 1.74 8.00 1.69 KS City BD ofPublicUtilities Not enough data for 2003KS City BD ofPublicUtilities 2004 31 0 0.46 0.41 1.68 6.00 0.32 11.00 0.58 8.00 0.53 KS City BD ofPublicUtilities 2005 33 0 0.81 0.66 3.65 7.00 0.55 13.00 1.09 8.00 0.63 KS City BD ofPublicUtilities 2006 39 0 0.25 0.20 1.77 8.00 0.25 14.00 0.15 10.00 0.15 KS City BD ofPublicUtilities 2007 33 0 0.58 0.54 1.63 7.00 0.38 11.00 0.87 9.00 0.57 KS City BD ofPublicUtilities 2008 31 0 0.72 0.56 2.09 6.00 0.32 13.00 0.88 8.00 0.72 KS City BD ofPublicUtilities 2009 28 0 0.57 0.49 1.00 5.00 0.33 10.00 0.71 8.00 0.55 KS City BD ofPublicUtilities 2010 34 0 0.59 0.52 1.34 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.72 9.00 0.63 
43 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

KS City BD ofPublicUtilities 2011 34 0 0.47 0.43 0.72 6.00 0.33 13.00 0.51 9.00 0.51 La Cygne 2006 26 0 1.05 0.76 3.33 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.86 9.00 0.43 La Cygne 2007 33 0 0.99 0.95 2.13 7.00 0.83 11.00 1.32 8.00 0.89 La Cygne 2008 27 0 1.56 1.27 4.52 6.00 1.08 12.00 2.26 7.00 1.20 La Cygne 2009 31 0 1.27 1.03 2.88 3.00 0.77 13.00 1.65 8.00 1.10 La Cygne 2010 32 0 1.63 1.45 5.07 6.00 0.77 12.00 2.00 8.00 1.25 La Cygne 2011 32 0 1.85 1.65 5.21 6.00 1.71 12.00 2.42 8.00 1.48 LeRoy Not enough data for 2007Linn ValleyLakes POA 2003 20 0 0.79 0.60 1.21 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.51 6.00 0.82 Linn ValleyLakes POA 2004 31 0 0.67 0.66 1.40 6.00 0.86 11.00 0.60 8.00 0.66 Linn ValleyLakes POA 2005 33 0 0.43 0.42 1.00 5.00 0.42 13.00 0.42 9.00 0.44 Linn ValleyLakes POA 2006 22 0 0.15 0.21 0.61 9.00 0.14 10.00 0.18 2.00 0.41 Linn ValleyLakes POA 2007 21 0 0.41 0.30 0.54 7.00 0.44 11.00 0.40 3.00 0.21 Linn ValleyLakes POA 2008 10 0 0.38 0.35 0.45 5.00 0.38 3.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 Linn ValleyLakes POA 2009 10 0 0.35 0.29 0.35 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 Linn ValleyLakes POA 2010 34 0 1.08 0.99 2.38 6.00 0.35 13.00 1.14 9.00 1.44 Linn ValleyLakes POA 2011 29 0 0.87 0.82 1.12 6.00 0.93 9.00 0.87 9.00 0.83 Lyndon Not enough data for 2007Marais DesCygnesPublic UtilityAuthority 2011 17 0 1.41 0.79 2.45 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.40 9.00 1.38 Miami Co. 2003 20 0 0.59 0.46 1.86 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.90 7.00 0.35 
44 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

RWD #2Miami Co.RWD #2 2004 30 0 0.66 0.71 1.78 5.00 0.85 11.00 0.31 8.00 0.47 Miami Co.RWD #2 2005 33 0 1.39 1.19 3.74 7.00 1.03 12.00 1.24 9.00 1.98 Miami Co.RWD #2 2006 37 0 0.57 0.59 1.63 9.00 0.88 12.00 0.42 10.00 0.48 Miami Co.RWD #2 2007 33 0 0.95 0.95 1.87 7.00 1.16 11.00 0.94 9.00 0.67 Miami Co.RWD #2 2008 31 0 0.64 0.60 1.33 6.00 0.87 13.00 0.59 8.00 0.62 Miami Co.RWD #2 2009 27 0 0.76 0.73 1.59 6.00 0.77 6.00 0.85 8.00 0.71 Miami Co.RWD #2 2010 34 0 0.62 0.60 1.16 6.00 0.56 13.00 0.67 9.00 0.62 Miami Co.RWD #2 2011 33 0 0.66 0.64 0.98 6.00 0.66 13.00 0.62 8.00 0.67 Milford Not enough data for 2003Milford 2004 31 0 2.27 2.13 3.19 6.00 1.89 11.00 2.06 8.00 2.73 Milford 2005 35 0 2.16 1.98 4.16 7.00 1.88 13.00 2.40 9.00 2.63 Milford 2006 39 0 0.83 0.75 2.81 8.00 0.70 14.00 0.55 10.00 0.97 Milford 2007 33 0 1.14 1.09 1.60 7.00 1.15 11.00 1.17 9.00 1.03 Milford 2008 33 0 1.43 1.31 2.37 7.00 1.33 13.00 1.41 8.00 1.24 Milford 2009 33 0 1.14 1.06 1.93 6.00 1.53 13.00 1.36 8.00 0.66 Milford 2010 35 0 0.90 0.85 1.89 7.00 0.64 13.00 0.89 9.00 1.13 Milford 2011 35 0 0.93 0.90 1.77 7.00 0.90 13.00 0.95 9.00 0.91 Mitchell Co.

RWD #2 2003 21 0 2.17 1.49 2.78 0.00 0.00 7.00 1.56 8.00 2.26 

Mitchell Co.

RWD #2 2004 31 0 1.97 1.86 2.73 6.00 1.91 11.00 1.85 8.00 2.13 

Mitchell Co.

RWD #2 2005 35 0 1.69 1.56 3.40 7.00 1.60 13.00 1.75 9.00 1.96 

Mitchell Co. 2006 38 0 0.86 0.78 2.42 9.00 0.90 12.00 0.76 10.00 0.87 
45 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

RWD #2Mitchell Co.

RWD #2 2007 30 0 1.48 1.38 2.07 6.00 1.11 9.00 1.30 9.00 1.54 

Mitchell Co.

RWD #2 2008 32 0 1.82 1.63 3.72 6.00 1.49 13.00 1.95 8.00 1.68 

Mitchell Co.

RWD #2 2009 35 0 1.59 1.56 1.99 6.00 1.49 13.00 1.54 9.00 1.56 

Mitchell Co.

RWD #2 2010 35 0 1.64 1.58 2.88 6.00 1.47 14.00 1.62 9.00 1.90 

Mitchell Co.

RWD #2 2011 33 0 1.77 1.65 2.49 6.00 1.16 12.00 1.64 9.00 1.99 

Neodesha 2011 26 0 0.85 0.55 5.35 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.25 9.00 0.43 Olathe‐‐ Compositeof Collector

Wells 2010 35 0 0.87 0.82 1.46 6.00 0.71 13.00 0.92 10.00 0.97 

Olathe‐‐ Compositeof Collector

Wells 2011 30 0 0.85 0.72 1.26 6.00 0.78 13.00 0.79 9.00 0.91 

Olathe‐‐ WP1 2003 6 0 0.92 0.33 1.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.86 Olathe‐‐ WP1 2004 8 0 0.38 0.23 1.33 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.16 7.00 0.43 Olathe‐‐ WP1 2005 16 0 0.61 0.31 1.24 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.53 6.00 0.38 Olathe‐‐ WP1 Not enough data for 2006Olathe‐‐River 2003 24 0 1.67 1.18 2.59 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.49 8.00 1.73 Olathe‐‐River 2004 31 0 1.03 1.00 2.20 6.00 1.06 11.00 1.14 8.00 1.04 Olathe‐‐River 2005 32 0 1.04 0.94 2.88 6.00 0.85 11.00 1.27 9.00 1.15 Olathe‐‐River 2006 38 0 0.73 0.67 4.19 9.00 0.33 13.00 0.72 11.00 1.11 Olathe‐‐River 2007 33 0 0.97 0.95 1.37 7.00 0.88 11.00 0.99 9.00 1.13 
46 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Olathe‐‐River 2008 32 0 1.01 0.95 1.39 6.00 1.11 13.00 0.94 8.00 1.11 Olathe‐‐River 2009 33 0 0.82 0.79 1.32 6.00 0.77 13.00 0.79 8.00 0.94 Olathe‐‐River 2011 4 0 0.86 0.24 1.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Osage Co

RWD #3 2004 31 0 1.84 1.70 3.63 6.00 1.38 11.00 2.04 8.00 2.15 

Osage Co

RWD #3 2005 35 0 1.98 1.67 9.40 7.00 1.10 13.00 2.92 9.00 1.90 

Osage Co

RWD #3 2006 37 0 1.37 1.27 3.52 8.00 0.90 13.00 1.47 9.00 1.50 

Osage Co

RWD #3 2007 32 0 1.58 1.40 3.55 6.00 1.26 11.00 2.04 9.00 1.26 

Osage Co

RWD #3 2008 29 0 1.68 1.24 5.58 3.00 0.82 13.00 2.13 8.00 1.33 

Osage Co

RWD #3 2009 34 0 1.62 1.48 5.31 6.00 1.23 13.00 2.17 8.00 1.48 

Osage Co

RWD #3 2010 33 0 2.21 1.78 7.59 6.00 0.62 12.00 3.51 9.00 1.79 

Osage Co

RWD #3 2011 34 0 1.66 1.53 3.63 6.00 1.54 13.00 1.79 9.00 1.59 

Osage Co.RWD #3 2003 24 0 1.98 1.27 5.54 0.00 0.00 10.00 2.16 8.00 1.61 Osage Co.RWD #3 Not enough data for 2006Oswego 2009 20 0 1.37 0.68 3.86 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.97 8.00 1.02 Oswego 2010 33 0 2.17 1.58 15.90 5.00 0.63 13.00 4.44 9.00 0.83 Oswego 2011 34 0 1.37 1.18 8.91 6.00 0.76 13.00 2.20 9.00 1.08 Paola Not enough data for 2003Paola 2004 31 0 0.69 0.69 1.20 6.00 0.80 11.00 0.64 8.00 0.79 Paola 2005 34 0 1.27 1.15 3.33 7.00 0.62 12.00 1.13 9.00 2.10 Paola 2006 40 0 0.65 0.65 3.20 9.00 0.96 14.00 0.53 10.00 0.50 Paola 2007 32 0 1.06 1.01 1.43 7.00 0.71 11.00 1.24 8.00 1.15 
47 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Paola 2008 31 0 0.87 0.77 1.47 6.00 0.79 13.00 0.94 8.00 0.85 Paola 2009 22 0 1.43 0.75 2.62 5.00 0.58 13.00 1.51 4.00 0.74 PublicWholesaleWSD #12 2003 24 0 1.81 1.26 3.70 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.62 8.00 1.81 PublicWholesaleWSD #12 2004 31 0 1.10 1.10 2.05 6.00 1.57 11.00 0.91 8.00 1.02 PublicWholesaleWSD #12 2005 34 0 1.05 1.02 2.31 7.00 0.94 11.00 0.80 9.00 1.58 PublicWholesaleWSD #12 2006 42 0 0.81 0.78 2.42 10.00 0.75 14.00 0.72 12.00 0.85 PublicWholesaleWSD #12 2007 32 0 1.18 1.16 1.71 7.00 1.27 11.00 1.32 8.00 1.02 PublicWholesaleWSD #12 2008 30 0 1.18 1.06 2.04 6.00 1.03 12.00 0.96 8.00 1.45 PublicWholesaleWSD #12 2009 34 0 0.83 0.78 1.33 5.00 0.64 13.00 0.79 9.00 0.91 PublicWholesaleWSD #12 2010 33 0 1.49 1.40 2.93 6.00 0.70 13.00 1.62 8.00 1.98 PublicWholesaleWSD #12 2011 33 0 1.28 1.25 1.73 6.00 1.15 13.00 1.14 8.00 1.33 PublicWholesaleWSD #5 Not enough data for 2003PublicWholesaleWSD #5 2004 31 0 0.98 0.88 2.12 6.00 0.72 11.00 1.21 8.00 1.07 PublicWholesaleWSD #5 2005 34 0 1.00 0.79 4.39 7.00 0.37 13.00 1.44 9.00 0.93 
48 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

PublicWholesaleWSD #5 2006 38 0 0.76 0.72 3.02 8.00 0.28 14.00 0.74 9.00 0.78 PublicWholesaleWSD #5 2007 31 0 0.96 0.94 2.63 7.00 0.79 10.00 1.33 8.00 0.97 PublicWholesaleWSD #5 2008 31 0 1.48 1.11 4.88 6.00 0.99 13.00 2.38 8.00 0.82 PublicWholesaleWSD #5 2009 31 0 0.90 0.81 2.14 5.00 0.45 13.00 1.14 6.00 1.23 PublicWholesaleWSD #5 2010 33 0 1.79 1.41 5.37 5.00 0.46 13.00 3.00 9.00 1.44 PublicWholesaleWSD #5 2011 34 0 1.51 1.34 3.56 6.00 0.75 13.00 1.66 9.00 1.50 Richmond Not enough data for 2003Richmond 2004 30 0 2.81 2.40 6.76 6.00 1.12 11.00 2.75 8.00 3.22 Richmond 2005 32 0 1.67 1.31 7.76 6.00 0.94 12.00 2.27 9.00 1.49 Richmond 2006 37 0 0.86 0.72 5.86 8.00 0.58 14.00 0.51 8.00 1.27 Richmond 2007 26 0 0.61 0.58 1.15 5.00 0.81 10.00 0.64 7.00 0.49 Richmond 2008 23 0 3.72 2.19 15.74 2.00 0.22 12.00 3.82 7.00 4.07 Richmond 2009 32 0 0.48 0.45 0.71 5.00 0.51 12.00 0.48 8.00 0.44 Richmond 2010 33 0 2.10 1.67 6.42 6.00 0.36 13.00 3.37 8.00 1.86 Richmond 2011 34 0 2.16 2.01 4.69 6.00 0.93 13.00 1.94 9.00 2.86 Salina Not enough data for 2006Salina 2007 23 0 0.73 0.54 1.35 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.55 9.00 0.77 Salina 2008 28 0 0.73 0.66 1.27 5.00 0.47 12.00 0.71 6.00 0.91 Salina 2009 34 0 0.62 0.57 3.04 6.00 0.48 13.00 0.72 8.00 0.62 
49 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Salina 2010 34 0 0.75 0.72 1.42 6.00 0.36 13.00 0.72 9.00 1.10 Salina 2011 34 0 0.71 0.65 4.37 6.00 0.45 13.00 0.91 9.00 0.76 Spring Hill 2004 4 0 7.36 1.08 10.80 0.00 0.00 4.00 3.89 0.00 0.00 Spring Hill Not enough data for 2006St. Paul Not enough data for 2003St. Paul 2004 31 0 1.72 1.49 10.66 6.00 0.87 11.00 3.14 8.00 1.31 St. Paul 2005 33 0 1.08 0.98 10.99 7.00 0.44 11.00 2.37 9.00 0.74 St. Paul 2006 41 0 0.94 0.81 4.54 9.00 0.92 14.00 1.15 11.00 0.61 St. Paul 2007 31 0 1.17 0.98 5.05 7.00 0.87 11.00 1.72 8.00 0.78 St. Paul 2008 27 0 1.40 1.03 7.13 5.00 0.80 11.00 2.60 8.00 0.50 St. Paul 2009 32 0 0.39 0.36 0.58 6.00 0.33 12.00 0.41 8.00 0.38 St. Paul 2010 34 0 0.49 0.45 3.38 6.00 0.43 13.00 0.65 9.00 0.37 St. Paul 2011 34 0 0.41 0.39 1.19 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.48 9.00 0.37 TopekaWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 24 0 1.87 1.45 5.22 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.86 8.00 2.06 TopekaWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 31 0 1.58 1.52 3.07 6.00 1.54 11.00 1.31 8.00 1.78 TopekaWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 35 0 1.35 1.18 3.93 7.00 1.03 13.00 1.86 9.00 1.46 TopekaWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 41 0 0.95 0.79 7.37 9.00 0.28 14.00 0.95 11.00 1.24 TopekaWaterTreatment 2007 33 0 1.42 1.38 2.87 7.00 1.23 11.00 1.61 9.00 1.63 
50 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

PlantTopekaWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 29 0 1.90 1.48 6.98 6.00 0.95 13.00 2.24 7.00 1.91 TopekaWaterTreatmentPlant 2009 23 0 1.46 1.20 3.57 6.00 0.98 6.00 1.77 8.00 1.55 LeitchfieldWaterWorks 2003 25 0 2.35 1.52 11.84 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.93 8.00 2.45 LeitchfieldWaterWorks 2004 31 0 2.08 1.90 4.91 6.00 0.39 11.00 2.56 8.00 3.59 LeitchfieldWaterWorks 2005 35 0 1.23 1.06 2.97 7.00 0.61 13.00 1.52 9.00 1.63 LeitchfieldWaterWorks 2006 40 0 0.41 0.36 2.71 9.00 0.31 13.00 0.45 11.00 0.35 LeitchfieldWaterWorks 2007 26 0 0.72 0.64 1.85 7.00 0.38 6.00 0.86 7.00 0.96 LeitchfieldWaterWorks 2008 30 0 0.94 0.77 3.00 6.00 0.34 11.00 1.25 8.00 0.99 LeitchfieldWaterWorks 2009 33 0 0.78 0.69 2.06 6.00 0.35 12.00 1.07 8.00 0.95 LeitchfieldWaterWorks 2010 33 0 1.63 1.40 4.26 5.00 0.32 13.00 2.27 8.00 1.91 LeitchfieldWaterWorks 2011 34 0 0.97 0.86 2.69 6.00 0.35 13.00 1.10 9.00 1.34 Livermore 2006 25 0 1.22 0.80 6.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 2.15 9.00 0.55 
51 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Livermore 2007 32 0 0.82 0.92 3.98 6.00 0.39 7.00 1.82 7.00 0.83 Livermore 2008 30 0 1.41 1.14 7.29 6.00 0.37 13.00 2.42 6.00 0.60 Livermore 2009 28 0 0.96 0.83 3.94 5.00 0.33 9.00 1.59 4.00 0.86 Livermore 2010 31 0 3.01 2.20 23.24 5.00 0.35 12.00 5.80 5.00 1.19 Livermore 2011 36 0 1.00 0.90 5.54 7.00 0.58 10.00 1.37 7.00 0.96 Livermore 1899 1 0 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Livermore 2006 23 0 1.21 0.66 6.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.71 9.00 0.55 MarionWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 25 0 0.81 0.59 2.37 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.05 8.00 0.69 MarionWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 31 0 1.69 1.63 3.36 6.00 0.41 11.00 2.05 8.00 2.49 MarionWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 4 0 1.68 1.41 3.68 1.00 2.97 1.00 0.00 2.00 2.53 MarionWaterTreatmentPlant‐‐LakeGeorge 2005 35 0 0.53 0.53 0.94 7.00 0.62 13.00 0.39 9.00 0.67 MarionWaterTreatmentPlant‐‐LakeGeorge 2006 37 0 0.13 0.11 1.71 7.00 0.09 14.00 0.08 9.00 0.18 MarionWaterTreatmentPlant‐‐LakeGeorge 2007 33 0 0.36 0.35 0.45 7.00 0.38 11.00 0.35 9.00 0.35 
52 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

MarionWaterTreatmentPlant‐‐LakeGeorge 2008 27 0 0.36 0.34 0.52 3.00 0.32 13.00 0.36 7.00 0.35 MarionWaterTreatmentPlant‐‐LakeGeorge 2009 4 0 0.35 0.20 0.35 4.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MarionWaterTreatmentPlant‐‐OldLake Not enough data for 2007Webster Co

WaterDistrict 2003 25 0 1.54 1.01 5.20 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.41 8.00 0.96 

Webster Co

WaterDistrict 2004 30 0 1.43 1.15 6.06 6.00 0.39 10.00 2.68 8.00 1.01 

Webster Co

WaterDistrict 2005 35 0 1.10 0.94 5.56 8.00 0.54 12.00 1.92 9.00 0.84 

Webster Co

WaterDistrict 2006 42 0 0.36 0.28 2.69 10.00 0.50 14.00 0.33 11.00 0.18 

Webster Co

WaterDistrict 2007 33 0 0.44 0.42 0.90 7.00 0.38 11.00 0.47 9.00 0.43 

Webster Co

WaterDistrict 2008 31 0 0.47 0.40 1.61 5.00 0.30 13.00 0.60 8.00 0.37 

Webster Co

WaterDistrict 2009 32 0 0.44 0.40 0.85 6.00 0.33 12.00 0.52 7.00 0.38 

Webster Co

WaterDistrict 2010 32 0 0.73 0.64 5.76 5.00 0.32 12.00 1.17 9.00 0.52 
53 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Webster Co

WaterDistrict 2011 33 0 0.83 0.71 3.79 6.00 0.37 12.00 1.15 9.00 0.81 

E. Jefferson

WaterWorks Dist.

#1 2003 28 0 0.96 0.79 3.01 0.00 0.00 6.00 1.72 14.00 0.95 

E. Jefferson

WaterWorks Dist.

#1 2004 44 0 0.83 0.83 3.15 9.00 0.41 11.00 1.47 13.00 1.15 

E. Jefferson

WaterWorks Dist.

#1 2005 37 0 0.86 0.75 2.51 8.00 0.42 13.00 1.07 8.00 1.10 

E. Jefferson

WaterWorks Dist.

#1 2006 51 0 0.45 0.41 2.18 10.00 0.28 14.00 0.76 15.00 0.44 

E. Jefferson

WaterWorks Dist.

#1 2007 42 0 0.72 0.68 1.28 8.00 0.52 11.00 0.84 13.00 0.89 

E. Jefferson

WaterWorks Dist.

#1 2008 44 0 0.74 0.69 2.20 10.00 0.61 13.00 0.95 12.00 0.81 

E. Jefferson

WaterWorks Dist.

#1 2009 46 0 0.67 0.64 1.35 9.00 0.55 13.00 0.90 13.00 0.66 

E. Jefferson

WaterWorks Dist.

#1 2010 44 0 0.72 0.68 2.08 8.00 0.44 12.00 1.07 13.00 0.76 

E. Jefferson

WaterWorks Dist.

#1 2011 45 0 0.65 0.61 1.14 8.00 0.47 13.00 0.78 13.00 0.76 
54 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

IbervilleWaterDistrict #3 2003 32 0 1.80 1.28 13.03 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.54 10.00 1.70 IbervilleWaterDistrict #3 2004 44 0 1.75 1.62 11.68 9.00 1.60 11.00 2.04 13.00 1.76 IbervilleWaterDistrict #3 2005 43 0 2.18 1.94 16.77 9.00 3.23 13.00 2.34 10.00 1.29 IbervilleWaterDistrict #3 2006 52 0 0.73 0.68 3.61 11.00 0.41 14.00 1.05 14.00 0.76 IbervilleWaterDistrict #3 2007 44 0 1.47 1.47 8.60 9.00 0.60 11.00 3.46 13.00 1.14 IbervilleWaterDistrict #3 2008 42 0 1.10 1.00 4.84 10.00 0.70 13.00 1.78 11.00 1.00 IbervilleWaterDistrict #3 2009 44 0 1.04 0.96 5.82 9.00 1.26 13.00 1.33 11.00 0.80 IbervilleWaterDistrict #3 2010 43 0 0.89 0.82 5.16 8.00 0.39 11.00 1.37 13.00 1.06 IbervilleWaterDistrict #3 2011 45 0 0.81 0.77 2.71 8.00 0.70 13.00 1.06 13.00 0.87 LaFourcheWater Dist.#1 2003 32 0 1.19 0.88 3.27 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.50 12.00 1.10 LaFourcheWater Dist.#1 2004 42 0 1.06 0.99 3.62 8.00 0.55 11.00 1.62 12.00 1.12 LaFourcheWater Dist.#1 2005 43 0 1.26 1.13 10.24 9.00 1.03 13.00 2.16 10.00 0.82 LaFourcheWater Dist.#1 2006 52 0 0.69 0.60 7.47 11.00 0.37 14.00 0.78 14.00 0.66 
55 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

LaFourcheWater Dist.#1 2007 43 0 0.83 0.79 5.97 9.00 0.57 11.00 0.81 13.00 1.33 LaFourcheWater Dist.#1 2008 43 0 0.88 0.80 4.27 10.00 0.55 13.00 1.12 11.00 1.06 LaFourcheWater Dist.#1 2009 40 0 0.75 0.69 3.11 9.00 0.55 13.00 1.17 8.00 0.66 LaFourcheWater Dist.#1 2010 44 0 1.26 1.11 11.27 7.00 0.75 13.00 1.21 13.00 1.08 LaFourcheWater Dist.#1 2011 44 0 0.94 0.86 4.86 8.00 0.86 13.00 1.21 12.00 1.01 ThibodauxWaterWorks 2008 43 0 1.00 0.89 4.88 10.00 0.64 13.00 1.61 11.00 0.90 ThibodauxWaterWorks 2009 10 0 0.70 0.29 0.92 9.00 0.61 1.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 ThibodeauxWaterWorks 2003 34 0 1.10 0.87 3.61 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.91 12.00 0.90 ThibodeauxWaterWorks 2004 44 0 1.07 1.04 4.01 9.00 0.53 11.00 1.92 13.00 1.14 ThibodeauxWaterWorks 2005 41 0 1.27 1.06 12.16 9.00 0.60 13.00 2.26 9.00 0.97 ThibodeauxWaterWorks 2006 52 0 0.56 0.59 4.44 11.00 0.49 14.00 1.05 14.00 0.55 ThibodeauxWaterWorks 2007 44 0 0.83 0.82 2.92 9.00 0.60 11.00 1.07 13.00 1.13 BucklinWaterDepartment 2003 21 0 0.30 0.25 1.22 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.41 7.00 0.23 
56 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

BucklinWaterDepartment 2004 31 0 0.30 0.32 1.08 6.00 0.30 11.00 0.17 8.00 0.39 BucklinWaterDepartment 2005 31 0 0.38 0.38 0.62 6.00 0.48 12.00 0.28 8.00 0.39 BucklinWaterDepartment 2006 36 0 0.07 0.07 0.53 9.00 0.11 12.00 0.07 10.00 0.06 BucklinWaterDepartment 2007 29 0 0.36 0.36 0.45 6.00 0.38 10.00 0.35 7.00 0.37 BucklinWaterDepartment 2008 25 0 0.40 0.36 0.62 4.00 0.34 9.00 0.36 7.00 0.41 BucklinWaterDepartment 2009 7 0 0.35 0.21 0.38 6.00 0.33 1.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 CameronLight &Power 2003 21 0 1.12 0.75 1.59 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.55 9.00 1.13 CameronLight &Power 2004 31 0 0.98 1.02 2.82 6.00 1.97 11.00 0.61 8.00 0.89 CameronLight &Power 2005 34 0 0.47 0.48 1.08 7.00 0.63 12.00 0.37 9.00 0.52 CameronLight &Power 2006 42 0 0.21 0.21 0.78 10.00 0.14 14.00 0.15 11.00 0.28 CameronLight &Power 2007 33 0 0.51 0.52 0.87 7.00 0.62 11.00 0.43 9.00 0.44 CameronLight &Power 2008 28 0 0.63 0.56 1.10 5.00 0.67 11.00 0.74 7.00 0.49 CameronLight &Power 2009 34 0 0.53 0.48 1.29 6.00 0.34 13.00 0.57 8.00 0.65 
57 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

CameronLight &Power 2010 34 0 0.52 0.48 1.34 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.64 9.00 0.51 CameronLight &Power 2011 34 0 0.80 0.71 2.29 6.00 0.44 13.00 1.10 9.00 0.69 ClarenceCannonWWC 2003 24 0 1.64 1.05 6.37 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.15 7.00 0.90 ClarenceCannonWWC 2004 31 0 0.90 0.80 3.10 6.00 0.65 11.00 1.26 8.00 0.82 ClarenceCannonWWC 2005 36 0 0.73 0.64 2.39 7.00 0.49 13.00 0.98 9.00 0.39 ClarenceCannonWWC 2006 34 0 0.49 0.41 2.50 9.00 0.86 13.00 0.29 11.00 0.31 ConcordiaWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 23 0 2.29 1.92 5.84 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.71 7.00 2.87 ConcordiaWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 29 0 2.43 2.24 5.43 6.00 1.16 10.00 2.01 7.00 3.56 ConcordiaWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 31 0 1.36 1.24 3.74 7.00 1.38 10.00 1.07 9.00 1.97 ConcordiaWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 35 0 1.14 0.88 5.59 8.00 1.10 12.00 0.69 9.00 0.63 ConcordiaWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 22 0 2.23 1.99 3.89 4.00 1.32 8.00 2.37 6.00 2.54 Concordia 2008 20 0 1.97 1.36 6.42 3.00 1.20 10.00 1.48 5.00 2.23 
58 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

WaterTreatmentPlantConcordiaWaterTreatmentPlant 2009 26 0 2.08 1.81 4.31 6.00 1.34 9.00 2.34 6.00 1.96 ConcordiaWaterTreatmentPlant 2010 30 0 2.08 1.55 9.26 3.00 0.79 12.00 3.42 9.00 1.31 ConcordiaWaterTreatmentPlant 2011 33 0 1.33 1.24 2.92 6.00 0.79 12.00 1.14 9.00 1.53 Creighton Not enough data for 2003Creighton 2004 31 0 0.95 0.77 3.96 6.00 0.48 11.00 0.71 8.00 1.60 Creighton 2005 35 0 0.38 0.40 0.62 7.00 0.60 13.00 0.28 9.00 0.33 Creighton 2006 7 0 1.37 0.37 6.22 6.00 0.94 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.32 DearbornWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 13 0 2.18 0.64 5.52 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.19 2.00 0.99 DearbornWaterTreatmentPlant Not enough data for 2006Drexel 2006 25 0 1.15 0.84 2.15 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.34 8.00 1.00 Drexel 2007 30 0 0.85 0.80 1.86 6.00 0.94 11.00 1.40 8.00 0.50 Drexel 2008 32 0 0.37 0.36 0.54 7.00 0.43 12.00 0.36 8.00 0.36 Drexel 2009 34 0 1.55 1.57 4.05 6.00 0.33 13.00 0.83 8.00 3.05 Drexel 2010 31 0 6.33 4.34 31.85 5.00 1.25 11.00 12.48 9.00 1.94 Drexel 2011 4 0 1.83 0.44 2.05 4.00 1.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 
59 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Drexel 1899 1 0 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Drexel 2010 31 0 6.33 4.34 31.85 5.00 1.25 11.00 12.48 9.00 1.94 Drexel 2011 4 0 1.83 0.44 2.05 4.00 1.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 HannibalWaterTreatment 2003 19 0 0.61 0.41 1.55 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.55 7.00 0.63 HannibalWaterTreatment 2004 31 0 0.70 0.60 2.63 6.00 0.30 11.00 1.18 8.00 0.70 HannibalWaterTreatment 2005 33 0 0.78 0.67 4.23 7.00 0.48 13.00 1.18 6.00 0.62 HannibalWaterTreatment 2006 4 0 1.66 1.63 3.46 2.00 2.23 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.17 HannibalWaterTreatment 2008 31 0 0.79 0.61 6.72 6.00 0.40 13.00 1.15 7.00 0.60 HannibalWaterTreatment 2009 5 0 0.35 0.20 0.35 5.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 HannibalWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 37 0 0.13 0.12 1.06 7.00 0.05 14.00 0.17 9.00 0.06 HannibalWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 31 0 0.57 0.49 1.49 7.00 0.44 10.00 0.64 9.00 0.54 HarrisonCountyPWSD #1 2006 24 0 1.46 1.11 2.43 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.34 9.00 1.56 HarrisonCountyPWSD #1 2007 29 0 1.52 1.41 2.28 7.00 1.66 10.00 1.56 8.00 1.28 HarrisonCounty 2008 27 0 0.94 0.70 1.35 1.00 0.27 13.00 1.04 8.00 0.86 
60 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

PWSD #1HarrisonCountyPWSD #1 2009 34 0 0.74 0.72 0.99 6.00 0.75 13.00 0.76 8.00 0.65 HarrisonCountyPWSD #1 Not enough data for 2010JamesportWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 25 0 1.07 0.83 2.47 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.95 8.00 1.36 JamesportWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 31 0 0.49 0.48 1.04 6.00 0.54 11.00 0.34 8.00 0.65 JamesportWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 35 0 1.08 1.00 3.46 7.00 0.37 13.00 0.67 9.00 2.13 JamesportWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 40 0 0.67 0.62 2.25 8.00 0.46 14.00 0.66 10.00 0.73 JamesportWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 33 0 1.33 1.37 2.90 7.00 0.77 11.00 1.36 9.00 2.07 JamesportWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 32 0 0.74 0.65 2.56 6.00 0.84 13.00 0.97 8.00 0.45 JamesportWaterTreatmentPlant 2009 7 0 0.35 0.21 0.35 6.00 0.33 1.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 King City 2010 19 0 0.70 0.44 0.85 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.29 10.00 0.72 King City 2011 33 0 0.64 0.61 1.55 6.00 0.56 12.00 0.68 9.00 0.61 
61 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

LaPlataWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 25 0 2.20 1.63 2.97 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.23 8.00 2.06 LaPlataWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 34 0 1.38 1.29 2.49 7.00 1.94 12.00 1.14 9.00 1.30 LaPlataWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 14 0 0.85 0.42 1.58 8.00 0.89 5.00 0.41 1.00 0.24 MarcelineWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 24 0 0.48 0.36 1.39 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.63 8.00 0.32 MarcelineWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 30 0 0.46 0.46 1.08 7.00 0.54 11.00 0.59 6.00 0.29 MarcelineWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 32 0 0.36 0.36 0.53 6.00 0.44 12.00 0.29 9.00 0.35 MarcelineWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 36 0 0.10 0.09 0.46 9.00 0.10 12.00 0.06 10.00 0.07 MarcelineWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 28 0 0.54 0.49 1.09 6.00 0.48 11.00 0.58 7.00 0.41 MarcelineWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 31 0 0.47 0.44 0.80 6.00 0.57 13.00 0.44 8.00 0.42 MarcelineWaterTreatment 2009 30 0 0.37 0.36 0.66 6.00 0.35 11.00 0.35 7.00 0.35 
62 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

PlantMarcelineWaterTreatmentPlant 2010 31 0 0.55 0.47 0.94 4.00 0.28 12.00 0.63 10.00 0.56 MarcelineWaterTreatmentPlant 2011 31 0 0.52 0.49 1.40 6.00 0.42 11.00 0.58 9.00 0.53 MaryvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 21 0 2.68 1.89 4.01 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.87 6.00 2.81 MaryvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 31 0 2.13 2.14 3.17 6.00 2.26 11.00 1.69 8.00 2.56 MaryvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 34 0 2.72 2.55 4.75 7.00 2.07 12.00 2.51 9.00 3.28 MaryvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 42 0 2.91 2.72 6.44 10.00 1.94 14.00 3.30 11.00 2.94 MaryvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 33 0 2.94 2.84 5.92 7.00 2.78 11.00 4.01 9.00 2.57 MaryvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 28 0 1.94 1.72 2.91 5.00 1.82 12.00 1.61 8.00 2.25 MaryvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2009 33 0 1.63 1.46 4.81 5.00 1.42 13.00 2.10 8.00 1.13 MaryvilleWater 2010 33 0 1.86 1.65 5.33 5.00 0.87 13.00 2.07 9.00 2.01 
63 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

TreatmentPlantMaryvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2011 34 0 1.57 1.56 2.26 6.00 1.43 13.00 1.33 9.00 1.64 Maysville 2006 24 0 0.81 0.54 1.89 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.81 7.00 0.73 Maysville 2007 19 0 0.59 0.55 1.01 3.00 0.78 6.00 0.61 4.00 0.43 Maysville 2008 32 0 0.39 0.38 0.52 7.00 0.44 12.00 0.36 8.00 0.41 Maysville 2009 34 0 0.37 0.36 0.44 6.00 0.33 13.00 0.37 8.00 0.39 Maysville 2010 33 0 2.36 1.94 13.41 5.00 0.33 13.00 2.47 9.00 3.54 Maysville 2011 34 0 0.76 0.74 1.47 6.00 1.18 13.00 0.79 9.00 0.55 Middle ForkWaterCompany 2003 6 0 1.23 0.29 3.31 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.29 3.00 0.53 Middle ForkWaterCompany 2004 26 0 0.73 0.58 3.08 2.00 0.68 10.00 0.91 8.00 0.45 Middle ForkWaterCompany 2005 35 0 1.42 1.28 4.08 7.00 0.37 13.00 1.11 9.00 2.39 Middle ForkWaterCompany 2006 39 0 1.12 1.06 2.45 8.00 0.96 14.00 1.18 10.00 1.24 Middle ForkWaterCompany 2007 33 0 0.67 0.67 1.47 7.00 1.13 11.00 0.60 9.00 0.50 Middle ForkWaterCompany 2008 30 0 0.38 0.37 0.48 5.00 0.38 13.00 0.36 7.00 0.44 Middle ForkWaterCompany 2009 30 0 0.40 0.39 0.49 5.00 0.30 11.00 0.38 8.00 0.45 Middle ForkWaterCompany 2010 34 0 0.44 0.41 0.61 6.00 0.36 12.00 0.47 9.00 0.46 
64 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Middle ForkWaterCompany 2011 35 0 0.41 0.40 0.46 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.40 9.00 0.44 MonroeCity‐‐Route J

Lake Not enough data for 2007

MonroeCity‐‐S. Lake 2003 21 0 0.49 0.48 1.72 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.92 7.00 0.45 MonroeCity‐‐S. Lake 2004 31 0 0.46 0.46 1.88 6.00 0.93 11.00 0.45 8.00 0.25 MonroeCity‐‐S. Lake 2005 34 0 0.42 0.43 0.67 7.00 0.52 12.00 0.35 9.00 0.46 MonroeCity‐‐S. Lake 2006 41 0 0.16 0.16 0.83 9.00 0.07 14.00 0.15 11.00 0.14 MonroeCity‐‐S. Lake 2007 33 0 0.44 0.44 0.83 7.00 0.53 11.00 0.40 9.00 0.41 MonroeCity‐‐S. Lake 2008 32 0 0.46 0.41 2.88 6.00 0.45 13.00 0.37 9.00 0.52 MonroeCity‐‐S. Lake 2009 6 0 0.38 0.21 0.44 6.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Shelbina 2003 25 0 0.12 0.13 0.22 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.12 8.00 0.12 Shelbina 2004 31 0 0.18 0.19 0.26 6.00 0.25 11.00 0.18 8.00 0.17 Shelbina 2005 32 0 0.43 0.44 0.62 7.00 0.61 11.00 0.29 8.00 0.46 Shelbina 2006 42 0 0.08 0.08 0.35 10.00 0.08 14.00 0.07 11.00 0.06 Shelbina 2007 32 0 0.36 0.34 0.45 7.00 0.38 11.00 0.35 9.00 0.35 Shelbina 2008 32 0 0.37 0.35 0.84 6.00 0.32 13.00 0.35 8.00 0.35 Shelbina 2009 7 0 0.35 0.21 0.35 6.00 0.33 1.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 Shelbina 1899 1 0 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Shelbina 2006 37 0 0.07 0.07 0.35 7.00 0.05 14.00 0.07 9.00 0.05 Shelbina 2007 32 0 0.36 0.34 0.45 7.00 0.38 11.00 0.35 9.00 0.35 SmithvilleWaterTreatment 2003 25 0 2.48 1.88 3.55 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.12 8.00 2.81 
65 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

PlantSmithvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 31 0 2.17 2.12 3.07 6.00 2.08 11.00 2.05 8.00 2.55 SmithvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 35 0 1.02 0.97 2.27 7.00 1.34 13.00 0.83 9.00 1.24 SmithvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 41 0 0.91 0.89 2.64 9.00 0.58 14.00 0.85 11.00 1.40 SmithvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 33 0 1.20 1.23 2.05 7.00 1.16 11.00 1.00 9.00 1.70 SmithvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 31 0 0.47 0.47 1.16 6.00 0.79 13.00 0.38 8.00 0.42 SmithvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2009 34 0 0.72 0.69 1.50 6.00 0.61 13.00 0.74 8.00 0.88 SmithvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2010 34 0 0.56 0.56 1.52 6.00 0.49 13.00 0.44 9.00 0.89 SmithvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2011 34 0 0.70 0.68 1.16 6.00 0.51 13.00 0.56 9.00 0.96 UnionvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 25 0 0.29 0.24 0.50 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.36 8.00 0.23 UnionvilleWater 2004 30 0 0.42 0.41 1.69 5.00 0.36 11.00 0.27 8.00 0.50 
66 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

TreatmentPlantUnionvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 35 0 0.40 0.42 1.22 7.00 0.57 13.00 0.26 9.00 0.40 UnionvilleWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 31 0 0.13 0.12 0.55 9.00 0.17 11.00 0.07 10.00 0.07 VandaliaWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 21 0 0.61 0.42 1.35 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.66 8.00 0.54 VandaliaWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 31 0 0.42 0.44 1.01 6.00 0.71 11.00 0.23 8.00 0.46 VandaliaWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 35 0 0.40 0.44 0.90 7.00 0.68 13.00 0.26 9.00 0.39 VandaliaWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 40 0 0.20 0.26 4.83 8.00 0.08 14.00 0.07 11.00 0.05 VandaliaWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 29 0 0.45 0.44 0.81 6.00 0.53 10.00 0.42 7.00 0.41 VandaliaWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 31 0 0.79 0.66 2.68 6.00 0.57 12.00 0.78 8.00 0.91 VandaliaWaterTreatmentPlant 2009 7 0 1.18 0.43 2.06 6.00 1.18 1.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 Wyaconda 2003 21 0 2.43 1.77 3.76 0.00 0.00 7.00 2.66 8.00 2.64 
67 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

WaterDepartmentWyacondaWaterDepartment 2005 43 0 3.93 3.65 20.29 6.00 0.30 12.00 11.04 13.00 1.80 WyacondaWaterDepartment Not enough data for 2006WyacondaWaterDepartment 2008 44 0 0.88 0.77 2.67 9.00 0.55 13.00 0.94 14.00 1.05 WyacondaWaterDepartment 2009 7 0 0.57 0.23 0.70 7.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WyacondaWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 31 0 0.74 0.72 1.39 6.00 0.92 11.00 0.85 8.00 0.72 WyacondaWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 55 0 0.56 0.55 1.63 14.00 0.97 14.00 0.46 14.00 0.37 WyacondaWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 47 0 0.78 0.79 1.23 13.00 0.74 12.00 0.65 9.00 0.93 JohnstonCountyUtilitiesDepartment 2006 14 0 0.08 0.14 0.42 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.13 6.00 0.05 JohnstonCountyUtilitiesDepartment 2007 32 0 0.51 0.46 0.92 11.00 0.66 10.00 0.47 5.00 0.36 JohnstonCountyUtilitiesDepartment 2008 33 0 0.54 0.47 1.10 12.00 0.72 11.00 0.51 6.00 0.40 Johnston 2009 35 0 0.43 0.41 0.62 11.00 0.43 11.00 0.46 6.00 0.35 
68 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

CountyUtilitiesDepartmentJohnstonCountyUtilitiesDepartment 2010 39 0 0.42 0.41 0.83 8.00 0.42 11.00 0.40 8.00 0.37 JohnstonCountyUtilitiesDepartment 2011 34 0 0.46 0.46 0.93 10.00 0.43 11.00 0.41 7.00 0.41 Monroe‐‐John Glenn Not enough data for 2003Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2004 31 0 0.54 0.53 0.98 6.00 0.65 11.00 0.43 8.00 0.73 Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2005 33 0 1.54 1.28 3.63 5.00 0.37 13.00 1.85 9.00 1.89 Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2006 39 0 0.79 0.93 13.20 8.00 0.78 14.00 0.43 10.00 0.19 Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2007 31 0 1.33 1.28 2.33 7.00 0.76 10.00 1.77 8.00 1.52 Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2008 27 0 1.82 1.62 3.63 6.00 1.20 11.00 2.14 6.00 2.29 Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2009 32 0 0.95 0.93 1.54 6.00 0.84 12.00 0.84 8.00 1.13 Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2010 31 0 0.49 0.44 0.85 3.00 0.36 12.00 0.51 10.00 0.51 Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2011 35 0 0.83 0.80 1.36 6.00 0.36 13.00 0.71 10.00 1.08 SouthGranville 2008 22 0 0.49 0.34 0.64 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.41 8.00 0.47 SouthGranville 2009 34 0 0.37 0.37 0.45 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.35 8.00 0.40 SouthGranville 2010 34 0 0.38 0.37 0.45 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.38 9.00 0.37 SouthGranville 2011 34 0 0.38 0.37 0.74 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.40 9.00 0.38 AllianceWater 2003 24 0 1.06 0.86 2.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.90 8.00 1.43 
69 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

TreatmentPlantAllianceWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 31 0 0.79 0.80 1.84 6.00 0.46 11.00 0.47 8.00 1.38 AllianceWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 32 0 0.50 0.46 0.86 4.00 0.28 13.00 0.40 9.00 0.64 AllianceWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 38 0 0.37 0.40 1.19 9.00 0.16 13.00 0.23 9.00 0.68 AllianceWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 33 0 0.48 0.47 0.69 7.00 0.38 11.00 0.50 9.00 0.52 AllianceWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 29 0 0.38 0.35 0.47 6.00 0.32 10.00 0.37 8.00 0.39 AllianceWaterTreatmentPlant 2009 7 0 0.35 0.21 0.38 6.00 0.33 1.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 Blanchester Not enough data for 2003Blanchester 2004 31 0 1.89 1.63 16.90 6.00 0.44 11.00 1.87 8.00 2.85 Blanchester 2005 34 0 8.09 5.78 42.74 6.00 0.65 13.00 17.55 9.00 3.27 Blanchester 2006 39 0 1.65 1.43 18.82 8.00 0.54 14.00 2.06 10.00 2.11 Blanchester 2007 33 0 0.96 0.96 3.28 7.00 0.48 11.00 0.53 9.00 1.31 Blanchester 2008 32 0 4.29 3.78 11.02 6.00 6.68 13.00 5.47 8.00 1.80 Blanchester 2009 34 0 4.25 3.85 11.26 6.00 6.15 13.00 6.45 8.00 2.01 Blanchester 2010 34 0 2.71 2.15 16.42 6.00 0.73 13.00 5.16 9.00 1.68 
70 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Blanchester 2011 34 0 0.65 0.65 1.19 6.00 0.67 13.00 0.42 9.00 0.96 BowlingGreenWaterTreatment 2003 21 0 0.51 0.37 1.01 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.58 7.00 0.50 BowlingGreenWaterTreatment Not enough data for 2006BowlingGreenWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 31 0 0.34 0.34 0.55 6.00 0.34 11.00 0.31 8.00 0.37 BowlingGreenWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 35 0 0.40 0.40 0.66 7.00 0.42 13.00 0.33 9.00 0.45 BowlingGreenWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 39 0 0.18 0.17 0.56 8.00 0.11 14.00 0.19 10.00 0.21 BowlingGreenWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 33 0 0.61 0.60 0.93 7.00 0.42 11.00 0.58 9.00 0.80 BowlingGreenWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 30 0 0.54 0.48 1.20 5.00 0.39 13.00 0.55 8.00 0.56 BowlingGreenWaterTreatmentPlant 2009 7 0 0.47 0.23 0.54 6.00 0.43 1.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 
71 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

CinnamonLake UtilityCo. 2003 19 0 2.15 1.35 2.95 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.82 8.00 2.32 CinnamonLake UtilityCo. 2004 31 0 2.12 2.21 4.64 6.00 1.34 11.00 0.83 8.00 3.64 CinnamonLake UtilityCo. 2005 35 0 1.11 1.09 2.63 7.00 1.38 13.00 0.85 9.00 1.50 CinnamonLake UtilityCo. 2006 40 0 1.33 1.40 3.73 9.00 0.52 14.00 0.73 10.00 2.66 CinnamonLake UtilityCo. 2007 31 0 1.00 1.00 2.19 6.00 1.45 11.00 0.88 8.00 0.99 CinnamonLake UtilityCo. 2008 31 0 0.65 0.65 1.28 6.00 0.51 13.00 0.40 7.00 0.82 CinnamonLake UtilityCo. Not enough data for 2009City ofDefiance 2003 25 0 1.13 0.74 4.90 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.79 8.00 0.64 City ofDefiance 2004 31 0 1.58 1.69 14.91 6.00 0.34 11.00 4.95 8.00 1.04 City ofDefiance 2005 34 0 1.74 1.34 9.53 7.00 0.38 12.00 3.29 9.00 1.31 City ofDefiance 2006 40 0 2.17 2.02 22.78 9.00 1.11 14.00 4.48 12.00 0.80 City ofDefiance 2007 32 0 1.24 0.98 5.74 7.00 0.44 11.00 2.01 9.00 0.96 City ofDefiance 2008 29 0 1.60 1.22 12.37 4.00 0.30 13.00 1.68 8.00 2.12 City ofDefiance 2009 34 0 1.04 1.02 2.33 6.00 0.62 13.00 0.74 8.00 1.66 City ofDefiance 2010 34 0 1.22 1.06 2.96 6.00 0.51 13.00 1.48 9.00 1.46 City ofDefiance 2011 34 0 0.58 0.57 1.11 6.00 0.43 13.00 0.46 9.00 0.91 
72 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

City of Lima 2003 25 0 1.18 0.87 2.25 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.03 8.00 1.44 City of Lima 2004 31 0 0.88 0.87 1.42 6.00 1.01 11.00 0.68 8.00 0.98 City of Lima 2005 35 0 0.87 0.80 2.12 7.00 0.51 13.00 0.73 9.00 1.39 City of Lima 2006 40 0 0.77 0.79 2.75 9.00 0.32 14.00 0.88 11.00 0.74 City of Lima 2007 31 0 1.23 1.18 1.91 7.00 1.31 11.00 1.29 7.00 1.22 City of Lima 2008 33 0 1.13 1.12 2.24 7.00 0.80 13.00 0.87 8.00 1.41 City of Lima 2009 7 0 1.10 0.40 1.46 6.00 1.05 1.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 City ofShelby‐‐Reservoir 2 2003 20 0 0.77 0.54 1.19 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.55 7.00 0.70 City ofShelby‐‐Reservoir 2 2004 31 0 0.98 1.13 3.36 6.00 0.57 11.00 0.82 8.00 1.83 City ofShelby‐‐Reservoir 2 2005 33 0 1.02 0.91 4.15 6.00 0.65 12.00 1.03 9.00 1.33 City ofShelby‐‐Reservoir 2 2006 36 0 0.94 0.89 3.69 8.00 0.62 12.00 0.68 10.00 1.99 City ofShelby‐‐Reservoir 2 2007 33 0 0.51 0.52 0.82 7.00 0.52 11.00 0.47 9.00 0.51 City ofShelby‐‐Reservoir 2 2008 32 0 0.54 0.51 1.42 6.00 0.47 13.00 0.45 8.00 0.55 City ofShelby‐‐Reservoir 2 2009 33 0 0.44 0.44 1.10 6.00 0.43 12.00 0.42 8.00 0.51 City ofShelby‐‐Reservoir 2 2010 34 0 0.48 0.47 0.82 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.46 9.00 0.51 City ofShelby‐‐Reservoir 2 2011 34 0 0.54 0.48 5.24 6.00 0.43 13.00 0.76 9.00 0.37 Clermont Not enough data for 2003
73 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Co. WaterClermontCo. Water 2004 31 0 0.42 0.43 1.76 6.00 0.96 11.00 0.30 8.00 0.21 ClermontCo. Water 2005 35 0 1.28 1.11 3.24 7.00 0.43 13.00 1.49 9.00 1.67 ClermontCo. Water 2006 39 0 0.58 0.56 2.18 8.00 1.34 14.00 0.56 10.00 0.24 ClermontCo. Water 2007 32 0 0.42 0.42 0.54 6.00 0.44 11.00 0.39 9.00 0.46 ClermontCo. Water 2008 32 0 0.74 0.60 2.73 7.00 0.58 13.00 1.15 8.00 0.39 ClermontCo. Water 2009 33 0 0.48 0.46 1.09 6.00 0.41 12.00 0.53 8.00 0.45 ClermontCo. Water 2010 34 0 1.12 0.92 6.83 6.00 0.85 13.00 1.99 9.00 0.48 ClermontCo. Water 2011 34 0 0.55 0.51 1.55 6.00 0.48 13.00 0.55 9.00 0.52 DelawareWater Plant 2003 25 0 1.61 1.05 9.04 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.36 8.00 1.18 DelawareWater Plant 2004 30 0 1.55 1.61 8.45 6.00 0.29 11.00 3.18 8.00 1.69 DelawareWater Plant 2005 35 0 1.73 1.38 21.46 7.00 0.47 13.00 3.12 9.00 1.42 DelawareWater Plant 2006 40 0 0.72 0.57 3.65 9.00 0.35 14.00 1.16 11.00 0.31 DelawareWater Plant 2007 33 0 1.08 0.99 5.41 7.00 0.41 11.00 1.97 9.00 0.88 DelawareWater Plant 2008 32 0 1.16 0.96 4.41 6.00 0.38 13.00 1.66 8.00 1.01 DelawareWater Plant 2009 34 0 0.88 0.81 4.42 6.00 0.46 13.00 1.08 8.00 1.04 DelawareWater Plant 2010 34 0 0.84 0.80 3.57 6.00 0.48 13.00 1.06 9.00 0.81 DelawareWater Plant 2011 34 0 1.04 0.91 6.29 6.00 0.53 13.00 1.56 9.00 0.89 Lake of the

WoodsWater Not enough data for 2003
74 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

CompanyLake of the

WoodsWaterCompany 2004 30 0 1.63 1.52 5.51 6.00 0.43 11.00 1.88 7.00 2.41 

Lake of the

WoodsWaterCompany 2005 34 0 1.52 1.45 5.53 7.00 0.47 12.00 1.52 9.00 2.28 

Lake of the

WoodsWaterCompany 2006 37 0 1.33 1.21 3.85 9.00 0.96 14.00 1.19 9.00 2.15 

Lake of the

WoodsWaterCompany 2007 32 0 0.64 0.61 1.33 6.00 0.73 11.00 0.45 9.00 0.51 

Lake of the

WoodsWaterCompany 2008 24 0 2.01 1.33 6.42 5.00 0.97 11.00 2.44 8.00 1.69 

Mc ClureWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 23 0 1.72 1.02 8.56 4.00 0.33 9.00 2.07 7.00 1.36 Mc ClureWaterTreatmentPlant Not enough data for 2006McClureWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 10 0 1.86 1.76 10.31 0.00 0.00 4.00 5.10 4.00 1.50 McClureWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 24 0 1.71 1.71 13.27 3.00 0.24 10.00 5.42 8.00 0.99 McClureWater 2006 33 0 2.11 1.55 17.35 7.00 0.05 13.00 5.16 10.00 0.75 
75 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

TreatmentPlantMcClureWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 26 0 2.62 1.67 8.55 5.00 0.41 6.00 3.02 9.00 2.72 McClureWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 31 0 3.94 2.60 40.39 7.00 0.45 12.00 7.61 8.00 1.87 McClureWaterTreatmentPlant 2009 34 0 2.69 1.98 22.77 6.00 0.42 13.00 5.30 8.00 1.64 McClureWaterTreatmentPlant 2010 34 0 2.55 1.94 14.03 6.00 0.40 13.00 5.20 9.00 1.53 McClureWaterTreatmentPlant 2011 34 0 1.83 1.41 9.95 6.00 0.44 13.00 2.54 9.00 2.01 Monroeville Not enough data for 2003Monroeville 2004 31 0 0.22 0.22 0.53 6.00 0.26 11.00 0.19 8.00 0.24 Monroeville 2005 35 0 0.40 0.40 0.62 7.00 0.47 13.00 0.37 9.00 0.38 Monroeville 2006 39 0 0.10 0.11 0.85 8.00 0.10 14.00 0.06 10.00 0.18 Monroeville 2007 31 0 0.37 0.37 0.53 7.00 0.42 11.00 0.36 7.00 0.35 Monroeville 2008 31 0 0.35 0.33 0.38 6.00 0.32 12.00 0.35 8.00 0.35 Monroeville 2009 31 0 0.36 0.35 0.51 5.00 0.33 13.00 0.35 7.00 0.35 Monroeville 2010 30 0 0.43 0.42 0.62 5.00 0.39 13.00 0.44 7.00 0.41 Monroeville 2011 34 0 0.41 0.40 1.15 6.00 0.36 13.00 0.40 9.00 0.49 Monroeville‐ West BranchHuron Not enough data for 2007
76 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Mt. Orab 2003 24 0 0.88 0.66 1.57 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.76 8.00 0.83 Mt. Orab 2004 29 0 0.58 0.57 0.99 6.00 0.76 9.00 0.50 8.00 0.57 Mt. Orab 2005 31 0 0.39 0.38 0.59 7.00 0.49 11.00 0.30 8.00 0.38 Mt. Orab 2006 44 0 0.11 0.12 0.54 10.00 0.17 15.00 0.06 11.00 0.11 Mt. Orab 2007 33 0 0.36 0.35 0.45 7.00 0.38 11.00 0.35 9.00 0.35 Mt. Orab 2008 31 0 0.35 0.32 0.35 6.00 0.32 13.00 0.35 8.00 0.35 Mt. Orab 2009 15 0 0.35 0.24 0.35 6.00 0.33 9.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 Mt. Orab 1899 1 0 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mt. Orab Not enough data for 2006Mt. Orab 2007 33 0 0.36 0.35 0.45 7.00 0.38 11.00 0.35 9.00 0.35 Napoleon Not enough data for 2003Napoleon 2004 31 0 1.49 1.41 9.37 6.00 0.38 11.00 3.99 8.00 0.87 Napoleon 2005 35 0 1.38 1.10 4.55 7.00 0.45 13.00 2.00 9.00 1.47 Napoleon 2006 39 0 1.82 1.44 10.19 8.00 0.36 14.00 3.59 10.00 0.67 Napoleon 2007 33 0 1.68 1.34 6.28 7.00 0.43 11.00 2.89 9.00 1.52 Napoleon 2008 32 0 2.12 1.52 12.96 6.00 0.62 13.00 3.93 8.00 1.14 Napoleon 2009 34 0 2.14 1.58 15.07 6.00 0.41 13.00 4.13 8.00 1.27 Napoleon 2010 34 0 2.30 1.73 11.65 6.00 0.39 13.00 4.60 9.00 1.30 Napoleon 2011 34 0 1.69 1.34 10.61 6.00 0.45 13.00 2.31 9.00 1.93 NewWashingtonWater Plant 2003 24 0 1.18 0.92 2.71 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.12 9.00 1.88 NewWashingtonWater Plant 2004 31 0 1.05 1.17 4.64 6.00 1.02 11.00 0.47 8.00 1.11 NewWashingtonWater Plant 2005 34 0 1.10 0.97 3.36 7.00 1.13 12.00 1.23 9.00 1.01 
77 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

NewWashingtonWater Plant 2006 38 0 0.48 0.55 3.17 9.00 0.20 14.00 0.25 10.00 1.24 NewWashingtonWater Plant 2007 27 0 0.96 0.88 1.86 4.00 0.42 10.00 0.89 9.00 1.23 NewWashingtonWater Plant 2008 28 0 0.57 0.53 0.83 5.00 0.55 13.00 0.54 5.00 0.63 NewWashingtonWater Plant 2009 4 0 0.42 0.21 0.45 4.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NewarkWaterWorks 2004 28 0 0.70 0.54 5.33 3.00 0.19 11.00 1.36 8.00 0.38 NewarkWaterWorks 2005 35 0 0.67 0.56 8.46 7.00 0.50 13.00 0.99 9.00 0.43 NewarkWaterWorks 2006 39 0 0.37 0.34 2.42 8.00 0.41 14.00 0.57 10.00 0.08 NewarkWaterWorks 2007 32 0 0.48 0.44 2.04 7.00 0.41 11.00 0.65 9.00 0.38 NewarkWaterWorks 2008 32 0 0.81 0.63 7.46 7.00 0.35 12.00 1.41 8.00 0.47 NewarkWaterWorks 2009 33 0 0.52 0.46 2.34 5.00 0.38 13.00 0.70 8.00 0.38 NewarkWaterWorks 2010 34 0 0.45 0.42 0.94 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.54 9.00 0.37 NewarkWaterWorks 2011 140 0 0.87 0.58 10.58 6.00 0.43 91.00 1.11 37.00 0.41 NewarkWaterWorks, Not enough data for 2007
78 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

NewarkNorwalkWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 23 0 0.75 0.54 2.52 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.39 7.00 0.56 NorwalkWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 30 0 0.87 0.85 3.34 6.00 1.79 11.00 0.70 7.00 0.30 NorwalkWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 33 0 0.45 0.51 1.33 6.00 0.90 13.00 0.23 8.00 0.41 NorwalkWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 41 0 0.16 0.14 0.55 9.00 0.16 14.00 0.07 11.00 0.12 NorwalkWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 32 0 0.61 0.62 1.28 7.00 0.61 11.00 0.43 8.00 0.49 NorwalkWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 31 0 0.42 0.40 0.70 6.00 0.48 13.00 0.35 8.00 0.40 NorwalkWaterTreatmentPlant 2009 7 0 0.47 0.24 0.60 6.00 0.46 1.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 PiquaReservoir 2003 19 0 1.96 1.01 12.30 0.00 0.00 6.00 3.08 7.00 0.52 PiquaReservoir 2004 31 0 1.30 1.22 5.99 6.00 0.29 11.00 2.71 8.00 1.28 PiquaReservoir 2006 4 0 4.07 2.62 5.92 2.00 3.68 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.53 PiquaReservoir 1899 1 0 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PiquaReservoir 2004 31 0 1.30 1.22 5.99 6.00 0.29 11.00 2.71 8.00 1.28 
79 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

PiquaReservoir Not enough data for 2006Piqua‐‐SwiftLake 2005 34 0 3.80 2.66 65.20 6.00 0.44 13.00 8.89 9.00 0.98 Piqua‐‐SwiftLake 2006 36 0 1.35 1.17 7.41 7.00 0.35 13.00 1.74 9.00 0.87 Piqua‐‐SwiftLake 2007 33 0 1.74 1.43 5.76 7.00 0.92 11.00 2.37 9.00 1.41 Piqua‐‐SwiftLake 2008 33 0 4.24 2.99 48.92 7.00 1.57 13.00 8.29 8.00 1.59 Piqua‐‐SwiftLake 2009 34 0 0.96 0.89 2.31 6.00 1.34 13.00 1.11 8.00 0.64 Piqua‐‐SwiftLake 2010 34 0 1.39 1.19 9.05 6.00 1.12 13.00 2.22 9.00 0.71 Piqua‐‐SwiftLake 2011 34 0 1.93 1.56 13.91 6.00 1.31 13.00 3.51 9.00 0.90 UpperSanduskyCity Hall 2003 18 0 1.26 0.93 3.16 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.73 6.00 1.67 UpperSanduskyCity Hall 2004 29 0 0.87 0.80 1.88 5.00 0.54 11.00 0.81 8.00 1.10 UpperSanduskyCity Hall 2005 35 0 1.34 1.27 2.64 7.00 1.23 13.00 1.39 9.00 1.55 UpperSanduskyCity Hall 2006 34 0 0.40 0.36 1.96 8.00 0.58 11.00 0.33 7.00 0.10 UpperSanduskyCity Hall 2007 29 0 0.76 0.71 1.59 4.00 0.64 10.00 0.66 9.00 0.67 UpperSanduskyCity Hall 2008 27 0 0.77 0.69 1.24 6.00 0.81 12.00 0.73 7.00 0.66 UpperSanduskyCity Hall 2009 4 0 0.80 0.24 0.88 4.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Village ofOttawa 2003 25 0 0.96 0.73 2.02 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.84 8.00 1.15 
80 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Village ofOttawa 2004 31 0 0.55 0.58 1.46 6.00 0.56 11.00 0.33 8.00 0.60 Village ofOttawa 2005 35 0 0.64 0.68 2.09 7.00 0.51 13.00 0.45 9.00 1.10 Village ofOttawa 2006 40 0 0.15 0.15 0.54 9.00 0.11 14.00 0.12 10.00 0.16 Village ofOttawa 2007 33 0 0.50 0.50 0.70 7.00 0.46 11.00 0.46 9.00 0.57 Village ofOttawa 2008 29 0 0.63 0.63 1.24 6.00 0.40 13.00 0.54 5.00 1.06 Village ofOttawa 2009 32 0 0.84 0.79 2.50 6.00 0.41 12.00 0.79 7.00 1.39 Village ofOttawa 2010 30 0 1.18 0.97 2.81 5.00 0.46 13.00 1.22 7.00 1.46 Village ofOttawa 2011 34 0 1.01 0.96 2.66 6.00 0.51 13.00 0.71 9.00 1.73 WaynokaRegionalWater 2003 11 0 0.54 0.32 0.75 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.42 7.00 0.52 WaynokaRegionalWater 2004 20 0 2.98 2.43 10.67 3.00 0.25 6.00 0.26 5.00 6.22 WaynokaRegionalWater 2005 36 0 1.63 1.49 3.52 7.00 1.72 13.00 1.88 9.00 1.64 WaynokaRegionalWater 2006 40 0 0.45 0.46 0.83 8.00 0.51 14.00 0.38 11.00 0.50 WaynokaRegionalWater 2007 33 0 0.61 0.60 0.82 7.00 0.73 11.00 0.61 9.00 0.57 WaynokaRegionalWater 2008 32 0 0.42 0.41 0.80 7.00 0.65 13.00 0.38 8.00 0.35 WaynokaRegionalWater 2009 33 0 0.35 0.34 0.35 5.00 0.30 13.00 0.35 8.00 0.35 WaynokaRegional 2010 32 0 0.40 0.40 1.29 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.38 8.00 0.37 
81 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

WaterWaynokaRegionalWater 2011 34 0 0.37 0.36 0.37 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.37 9.00 0.37 Wilmington Not enough data for 2003Wilmington 2004 31 0 0.91 0.90 1.79 6.00 0.57 11.00 0.88 8.00 0.87 Wilmington 2005 31 0 1.01 0.94 3.05 6.00 0.60 11.00 1.25 8.00 1.25 Wilmington 2006 39 0 0.60 0.57 1.89 8.00 0.51 14.00 0.38 9.00 0.65 Wilmington 2007 31 0 0.51 0.51 1.07 7.00 0.82 11.00 0.42 9.00 0.41 Wilmington 2008 33 0 0.75 0.67 1.71 7.00 0.49 13.00 0.89 8.00 0.70 Wilmington 2009 32 0 0.77 0.73 1.11 6.00 0.82 12.00 0.80 8.00 0.63 Wilmington 2010 33 0 0.77 0.74 1.24 6.00 0.81 12.00 0.79 9.00 0.68 Wilmington 2011 33 0 0.78 0.78 1.95 6.00 0.92 12.00 0.60 9.00 0.96 Polk Center 2008 21 0 2.67 1.29 33.91 0.00 0.00 8.00 4.27 5.00 0.46 Polk Center 2009 35 0 0.37 0.36 0.66 6.00 0.33 12.00 0.40 6.00 0.37 Polk Center 2010 38 0 0.99 0.82 7.21 6.00 0.35 13.00 2.20 6.00 0.38 Polk Center 2011 40 0 0.38 0.37 0.84 7.00 0.33 13.00 0.41 7.00 0.37 AquillaWaterSupplyDistrict 2003 23 0 1.81 1.32 2.85 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.53 7.00 1.93 AquillaWaterSupplyDistrict 2004 31 0 1.20 1.10 3.01 9.00 1.58 11.00 1.25 6.00 0.89 AquillaWaterSupplyDistrict 2005 33 0 0.94 0.88 2.02 8.00 0.37 13.00 1.20 6.00 1.15 AquillaWater 2006 30 0 0.93 0.74 2.69 11.00 0.95 10.00 1.24 8.00 0.57 
82 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

SupplyDistrictBrazosportWaterAuthority 2003 22 0 0.64 0.40 2.03 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.89 5.00 0.28 BrazosportWaterAuthority 2004 32 0 0.67 0.62 1.45 8.00 0.81 11.00 0.95 7.00 0.42 BrazosportWaterAuthority 2005 36 0 0.90 0.77 2.74 8.00 0.91 13.00 1.18 9.00 0.61 BrazosportWaterAuthority 2006 39 0 0.26 0.25 1.00 11.00 0.24 13.00 0.38 9.00 0.20 BrazosportWaterAuthority 2007 27 0 1.32 0.93 10.32 9.00 1.05 10.00 1.09 5.00 0.47 BrazosportWaterAuthority 2008 25 0 1.19 0.77 4.75 7.00 0.77 12.00 1.60 4.00 0.52 BrazosportWaterAuthority 2009 32 0 1.09 0.89 4.97 9.00 0.55 10.00 1.85 6.00 0.52 BrazosportWaterAuthority 2010 32 0 0.66 0.57 1.89 7.00 0.46 12.00 0.94 9.00 0.50 BrazosportWaterAuthority 2011 35 0 0.67 0.63 2.99 9.00 1.11 13.00 0.58 7.00 0.42 Cameron 2006 17 0 0.20 0.28 0.70 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.55 6.00 0.20 Cameron 2007 31 0 1.23 1.03 7.15 8.00 2.16 11.00 1.15 6.00 0.43 Cameron 2008 27 0 0.67 0.59 2.13 6.00 0.52 11.00 0.98 5.00 0.38 Cameron 2009 30 0 0.76 0.62 2.05 9.00 0.53 10.00 1.07 6.00 0.44 Cameron 2010 29 0 0.63 0.59 2.32 6.00 0.60 11.00 0.81 7.00 0.44 Cameron 2011 35 0 0.54 0.50 1.65 8.00 0.47 14.00 0.67 7.00 0.42 
83 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Cameron 1899 1 0 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cameron 2009 30 0 0.76 0.62 2.05 9.00 0.53 10.00 1.07 6.00 0.44 City of Ennis 2003 21 0 1.14 0.84 1.55 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.92 6.00 1.33 City of Ennis 2004 32 0 1.33 1.32 2.77 9.00 0.98 11.00 1.77 6.00 1.47 City of Ennis 2005 36 0 0.64 0.62 1.19 9.00 0.65 14.00 0.74 7.00 0.64 City of Ennis 2006 40 0 0.44 0.38 2.27 11.00 0.49 14.00 0.54 8.00 0.26 City of Ennis 2007 32 0 0.82 0.72 2.21 9.00 0.71 11.00 1.21 6.00 0.51 City of Ennis 2008 33 0 0.82 0.77 1.32 10.00 0.53 13.00 0.98 5.00 0.87 City of Ennis 2009 10 0 1.18 0.39 1.54 9.00 0.98 1.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 City ofTaylor 2003 23 0 0.15 0.15 0.39 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.19 7.00 0.12 City ofTaylor 2004 31 0 0.50 0.40 2.35 9.00 0.36 11.00 0.90 6.00 0.16 City ofTaylor 2005 36 0 0.48 0.48 1.44 10.00 0.71 13.00 0.38 7.00 0.46 City ofTaylor 2006 38 0 0.14 0.14 0.42 11.00 0.07 13.00 0.20 8.00 0.10 City ofTaylor 2007 31 0 0.59 0.59 2.28 8.00 1.32 11.00 0.37 6.00 0.35 City ofTaylor 2008 30 0 0.48 0.42 1.37 8.00 0.39 12.00 0.58 6.00 0.38 City ofTaylor 2009 32 0 0.47 0.45 1.18 7.00 0.52 13.00 0.56 6.00 0.39 City ofTaylor 2010 35 0 0.49 0.47 0.89 8.00 0.38 13.00 0.53 7.00 0.60 City ofTaylor 2011 33 0 0.40 0.39 0.47 8.00 0.36 12.00 0.42 7.00 0.39 CooperWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 12 0 0.33 0.25 0.46 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.17 5.00 0.33 CooperWaterTreatment 2004 29 0 0.22 0.23 0.41 8.00 0.31 10.00 0.22 5.00 0.20 
84 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

PlantCooperWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 32 0 1.95 1.77 4.33 8.00 0.50 12.00 2.92 5.00 2.23 CooperWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 38 0 0.64 0.58 4.28 12.00 1.08 13.00 0.44 5.00 0.20 CooperWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 24 0 1.70 1.42 2.85 7.00 1.79 8.00 2.57 6.00 0.95 CooperWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 27 0 1.75 1.27 3.35 6.00 0.96 12.00 2.13 6.00 1.36 CooperWaterTreatmentPlant 2009 31 0 1.12 1.07 3.25 8.00 0.90 10.00 1.69 6.00 1.18 CooperWaterTreatmentPlant 2010 31 0 2.05 1.65 4.81 6.00 0.44 12.00 3.17 8.00 1.80 CooperWaterTreatmentPlant 2011 31 0 0.69 0.66 1.17 7.00 0.96 12.00 0.68 7.00 0.53 Corsicanna 2003 23 0 0.96 0.74 1.35 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.90 6.00 1.03 Corsicanna 2004 32 0 2.50 2.29 5.07 9.00 2.77 11.00 2.48 6.00 2.44 Corsicanna 2005 35 0 1.90 1.73 4.26 9.00 2.67 13.00 2.04 7.00 1.37 Corsicanna 2006 33 0 1.04 0.85 2.83 11.00 1.03 13.00 1.08 8.00 0.97 Crosby 2008 19 0 1.34 0.80 2.25 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.03 6.00 1.52 Crosby 2009 35 0 1.38 1.16 6.87 9.00 1.25 13.00 1.84 6.00 0.89 
85 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

Crosby 2010 34 0 1.42 1.23 3.81 8.00 0.64 13.00 2.20 7.00 1.41 Crosby 2011 29 0 1.23 0.98 1.98 8.00 0.74 13.00 1.41 7.00 1.34 Crosby 1899 1 0 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crosby 2009 35 0 1.38 1.16 6.87 9.00 1.25 13.00 1.84 6.00 0.89 Crosby‐‐Gulf

Aquifer 2011 5 0 0.84 0.28 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

MarlinWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 16 0 1.49 0.82 5.64 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.42 5.00 1.28 MarlinWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 33 0 0.37 0.33 0.71 9.00 0.51 11.00 0.46 7.00 0.20 MarlinWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 35 0 2.27 1.95 4.55 9.00 1.77 13.00 3.09 7.00 2.35 MarlinWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 32 0 0.20 0.19 0.58 10.00 0.37 13.00 0.15 8.00 0.12 MidlothianWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 22 0 1.34 1.02 1.64 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.18 6.00 1.54 MidlothianWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 32 0 1.81 1.69 3.54 9.00 1.75 11.00 2.28 6.00 1.57 MidlothianWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 35 0 1.81 1.69 3.94 9.00 1.07 13.00 2.27 7.00 2.31 MidlothianWaterTreatment 2006 40 0 0.92 0.89 2.59 11.00 1.22 14.00 0.86 8.00 0.82 
86 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

PlantMidlothianWaterTreatmentPlant 2007 33 0 1.58 1.47 2.68 9.00 1.12 11.00 2.16 7.00 1.47 MidlothianWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 33 0 1.74 1.51 3.77 9.00 1.09 13.00 2.18 6.00 1.69 MidlothianWaterTreatmentPlant 2009 10 0 1.70 0.52 2.72 9.00 1.40 1.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 Waterwood 2010 12 0 0.53 0.31 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.45 Waterwood 2011 34 0 0.48 0.44 0.99 8.00 0.37 13.00 0.54 7.00 0.43 Waterwood 1899 1 0 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Waterwood 2010 12 0 0.53 0.31 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.45 WaxahachieWaterTreatmentPlant 2003 18 0 1.12 0.79 1.57 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.74 6.00 1.37 WaxahachieWaterTreatmentPlant 2004 32 0 1.10 1.04 2.71 9.00 1.34 11.00 1.41 6.00 0.94 WaxahachieWaterTreatmentPlant 2005 36 0 0.41 0.41 0.63 8.00 0.34 13.00 0.35 9.00 0.50 WaxahachieWaterTreatmentPlant 2006 39 0 0.64 0.60 1.62 11.00 0.39 14.00 0.86 7.00 0.78 WaxahachieWaterTreatment 2007 28 0 1.05 0.86 2.03 9.00 0.73 11.00 1.58 5.00 0.77 
87 

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (De

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arith

Average

Annual

Ave

Max

Value

# 1st

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 1st

Qtr

Samples

# 2nd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 2nd

Qtr

Samples

# 3rd

Qtr

Samples

90‐d

avg 3rd

Qtr

Samples

PlantWaxahachieWaterTreatmentPlant 2008 25 0 1.59 1.16 2.26 4.00 0.36 13.00 1.82 4.00 1.59 WaxahachieWaterTreatmentPlant 2009 24 0 1.44 1.12 1.96 9.00 1.39 7.00 1.47 7.00 1.37 WaxahachieWaterTreatmentPlant 2010 23 0 0.58 0.55 0.70 6.00 0.52 8.00 0.59 5.00 0.55 WaxahachieWaterTreatmentPlant 2011 22 0 0.60 0.57 0.73 1.00 0.55 7.00 0.58 7.00 0.53 
88 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Stockton East

Water District 2007 25 0 0.35 0.32 0.46 3.00 0.23 6.00 0.35 6.00 0.35 

Stockton East

Water District‐‐New Melones

Reservoir 2007 14 0 0.36 0.23 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.24 Sumner Hills 2007 28 0 0.35 0.32 0.35 3.00 0.23 6.00 0.35 7.00 0.35 Belle Glade 2007 38 0 0.60 0.55 1.55 8.00 0.49 11.00 0.55 8.00 0.69 Lee County

Utilities 2007 37 0 0.58 0.62 1.69 8.00 0.45 11.00 0.62 7.00 0.86 

Peace RiverRegional Water 2007 37 0 0.39 0.40 0.75 8.00 0.40 10.00 0.47 8.00 0.42 Punta Gorda 2007 37 0 0.39 0.40 0.92 8.00 0.40 11.00 0.41 8.00 0.40 CentervilleMunicipal Water

Works 2003 25 0 5.24 4.33 15.22 0.00 0.00 12.00 4.38 7.00 9.00 

CentervilleMunicipal Water

Works 2004 33 0 2.08 1.98 4.73 6.00 2.56 13.00 1.94 8.00 1.88 

CentervilleMunicipal Water

Works 2005 35 0 1.64 1.64 3.40 7.00 1.41 13.00 1.10 9.00 2.57 

CentervilleMunicipal Water

Works 2006 14 0 1.41 0.64 2.32 7.00 1.54 7.00 0.72 0.00 0.00 

CharitonMunicipal Water

Works 2003 25 0 2.94 2.21 5.20 0.00 0.00 12.00 2.26 7.00 3.66 

CharitonMunicipal Water

Works 2004 33 0 2.58 2.64 4.55 6.00 2.26 13.00 1.80 8.00 3.59 

CharitonMunicipal Water

Works 2005 35 0 1.77 1.72 3.88 7.00 2.38 13.00 1.70 9.00 1.96 

CharitonMunicipal Water

Works 2006 33 0 0.88 0.86 1.51 6.00 0.96 13.00 0.77 9.00 1.15 
89 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

CharitonMunicipal Water

Works 2007 31 0 1.26 1.31 2.17 7.00 0.86 12.00 1.08 9.00 1.68 

CharitonMunicipal Water

Works 2008 32 0 2.27 1.91 6.58 6.00 0.91 13.00 1.98 8.00 3.48 

CharitonMunicipal Water

Works 2009 8 0 0.97 0.51 1.36 6.00 0.90 1.00 0.59 1.00 0.40 

Creston 2007 34 0 2.24 2.14 4.64 7.00 1.53 13.00 2.16 9.00 3.08 Creston 2010 33 0 1.87 1.78 4.53 6.00 1.05 13.00 1.41 9.00 2.76 Creston‐‐ 12Mile Lake 2003 23 0 2.97 1.99 3.91 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.54 9.00 3.22 Creston‐‐ 12Mile Lake 2004 33 0 2.39 2.30 3.72 6.00 2.58 13.00 2.13 8.00 2.65 Creston‐‐ 12Mile Lake 2005 20 0 2.19 1.13 3.74 7.00 2.09 13.00 2.16 0.00 0.00 Creston‐‐ 12Mile Lake Not enough data for 2008Creston‐‐ 3 MileLake 2003 24 0 2.79 1.93 4.42 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.72 9.00 3.12 Creston‐‐ 3 MileLake 2004 33 0 2.26 2.17 3.85 6.00 2.34 13.00 1.94 8.00 2.72 Creston‐‐ 3 MileLake 2005 33 0 1.99 1.85 4.23 6.00 1.78 13.00 1.91 9.00 2.15 Creston‐‐ 3 MileLake 2006 34 0 1.34 1.28 2.26 7.00 1.55 13.00 1.21 9.00 1.46 Creston‐‐ 3 MileLake 2008 29 0 1.69 1.63 3.20 6.00 1.55 12.00 1.29 6.00 2.39 Creston‐‐ 3 MileLake 2009 33 0 1.45 1.43 1.98 6.00 1.23 13.00 1.31 7.00 1.84 Creston‐‐ 3 MileLake 2011 34 0 2.46 2.31 4.24 6.00 1.28 13.00 2.29 9.00 3.19 LamoniMunicipalUtilities 2003 24 0 1.85 1.44 5.41 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.96 9.00 3.48 LamoniMunicipalUtilities 2004 32 0 3.26 2.83 4.89 5.00 1.63 13.00 3.78 8.00 3.51 
90 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

LamoniMunicipalUtilities 2005 35 0 2.50 2.40 5.20 7.00 2.72 13.00 2.40 9.00 2.86 LamoniMunicipalUtilities 2006 30 0 2.78 2.15 6.41 7.00 1.61 13.00 2.44 9.00 3.89 Leon WaterWorks 2003 27 0 2.86 2.10 4.50 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.27 8.00 3.25 Leon WaterWorks 2004 33 0 2.54 2.40 4.14 6.00 2.37 13.00 2.25 8.00 3.21 Leon WaterWorks 2005 35 0 1.80 1.70 3.53 7.00 1.89 13.00 1.77 9.00 2.09 Leon WaterWorks 2006 30 0 1.08 0.91 2.29 7.00 1.21 13.00 0.86 9.00 1.26 MontezumaMunicipal Water 2003 27 0 1.43 1.06 1.93 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.20 8.00 1.58 MontezumaMunicipal Water 2004 33 0 1.30 1.25 2.41 6.00 1.07 13.00 1.03 8.00 1.84 MontezumaMunicipal Water 2005 35 0 1.68 1.59 4.57 7.00 1.02 13.00 1.34 9.00 2.59 MontezumaMunicipal Water 2006 35 0 0.87 0.84 2.01 7.00 1.11 13.00 0.78 9.00 0.98 MontezumaMunicipal Water 2007 35 0 0.95 0.92 1.76 7.00 0.77 13.00 0.89 9.00 1.27 MontezumaMunicipal Water 2008 32 0 1.43 1.25 4.59 7.00 0.55 13.00 1.45 7.00 2.14 MontezumaMunicipal Water 2009 33 0 2.48 2.07 6.31 6.00 0.66 12.00 3.05 8.00 3.41 MontezumaMunicipal Water 2010 33 0 1.91 1.47 5.10 5.00 0.53 13.00 2.94 9.00 1.85 MontezumaMunicipal Water 2011 34 0 1.68 1.60 3.28 6.00 0.49 13.00 1.33 9.00 2.64 OsceolaMunicipal Water

Works 2003 19 0 4.50 3.24 6.97 0.00 0.00 8.00 2.81 7.00 6.06 

OsceolaMunicipal Water

Works 2004 32 0 2.90 2.62 4.28 5.00 1.91 13.00 3.01 8.00 3.27 

OsceolaMunicipal Water 2005 34 0 2.81 2.70 4.29 7.00 2.34 12.00 2.76 9.00 3.47 
91 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

WorksOsceolaMunicipal Water

Works 2006 33 0 1.58 1.60 3.25 6.00 2.51 13.00 1.55 8.00 1.59 

OsceolaMunicipal Water

Works 2007 34 0 1.06 1.03 2.19 7.00 1.21 12.00 0.91 9.00 1.32 

OsceolaMunicipal Water

Works 2008 29 0 2.20 2.11 6.57 7.00 0.60 12.00 1.23 6.00 4.81 

OsceolaMunicipal Water

Works 2009 14 0 1.20 0.58 2.20 5.00 1.32 9.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 

RathbunRegional WaterAssociation 2004 33 0 2.01 2.01 2.92 6.00 1.96 13.00 1.61 8.00 2.48 RathbunRegional WaterAssociation 2005 35 0 1.49 1.45 2.55 7.00 1.80 13.00 1.35 9.00 1.64 RathbunRegional WaterAssociation 2006 30 0 1.08 0.91 1.85 7.00 1.17 13.00 0.87 9.00 1.30 RathburnRegional WaterAssociation 2003 27 0 2.00 1.55 3.22 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.38 8.00 2.36 WintersetWaterTreatment Plant 2003 24 0 3.88 2.81 6.44 0.00 0.00 10.00 2.65 8.00 4.73 WintersetWaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 3.53 2.88 50.23 6.00 1.68 13.00 5.55 8.00 2.70 WintersetWaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 4.24 3.65 31.67 7.00 1.25 13.00 7.06 9.00 3.68 WintersetWaterTreatment Plant 2006 35 0 2.02 1.95 4.25 7.00 2.76 13.00 2.07 9.00 1.95 
92 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

WintersetWaterTreatment Plant 2007 34 0 3.13 2.70 10.80 7.00 0.74 13.00 4.64 8.00 4.41 WintersetWaterTreatment Plant 2008 31 0 1.31 1.03 6.98 6.00 0.41 13.00 1.71 7.00 1.42 WintersetWaterTreatment Plant 2009 16 0 1.14 0.56 4.06 6.00 0.38 10.00 1.54 0.00 0.00 Aqua IllinoisVermillion Co 2003 25 0 2.21 1.91 17.50 0.00 0.00 11.00 5.96 8.00 1.24 Aqua IllinoisVermillion Co 2004 33 0 1.50 1.13 10.15 6.00 0.38 13.00 2.70 8.00 1.03 Aqua IllinoisVermillion Co 2005 36 0 2.54 1.94 11.05 7.00 0.44 14.00 4.49 9.00 2.32 Aqua IllinoisVermillion Co 2006 34 0 1.38 1.06 6.63 7.00 0.08 13.00 2.94 8.00 1.06 Aqua IllinoisVermillion Co 2007 34 0 1.63 1.38 6.08 7.00 0.41 12.00 2.50 9.00 1.69 Aqua IllinoisVermillion Co 2008 33 0 1.41 1.11 5.24 7.00 0.42 12.00 1.92 9.00 1.64 Aqua IllinoisVermillion Co 2009 34 0 2.13 1.58 12.62 6.00 0.45 13.00 3.91 8.00 1.29 Aqua IllinoisVermillion Co 2010 33 0 0.85 0.74 4.27 6.00 0.42 12.00 1.41 9.00 0.69 Aqua IllinoisVermillion Co 2011 34 0 2.48 1.80 13.87 6.00 0.43 13.00 5.03 10.00 1.17 Ashland CityHall 2003 27 0 5.26 3.64 10.79 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.37 8.00 5.43 Ashland CityHall 2004 32 0 1.75 1.78 3.86 6.00 2.53 12.00 1.47 8.00 1.79 Ashland CityHall 2005 34 0 0.82 0.74 2.51 7.00 0.62 13.00 0.99 9.00 0.99 Ashland CityHall 2006 34 0 0.35 0.36 1.02 7.00 0.41 13.00 0.32 8.00 0.51 Ashland CityHall 2007 34 0 0.53 0.51 0.76 7.00 0.53 13.00 0.52 9.00 0.57 Ashland CityHall 2008 30 0 1.12 1.04 2.55 6.00 0.43 12.00 0.85 7.00 1.82 
93 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Ashland CityHall 2009 31 0 0.93 0.91 1.73 6.00 0.95 11.00 0.96 8.00 1.10 Ashland CityHall 2010 29 0 2.44 1.76 5.30 4.00 0.43 13.00 3.22 9.00 2.30 Ashland CityHall 2011 7 0 0.90 0.34 1.07 5.00 0.76 2.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 Carlinville Water

Works 2003 22 0 3.05 2.26 6.60 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.66 8.00 4.20 

Carlinville Water

Works 2004 29 0 3.67 3.35 15.48 6.00 0.96 11.00 5.05 7.00 4.37 

Carlinville Water

Works 2005 35 0 1.56 1.45 5.22 7.00 0.65 13.00 0.79 9.00 3.09 

Carlinville Water

Works 2006 31 0 2.13 1.87 7.60 7.00 1.89 11.00 2.71 8.00 2.09 

Carlinville Water

Works 2007 33 0 2.91 2.60 7.06 6.00 1.02 13.00 3.28 9.00 3.77 

Carlinville Water

Works 2008 29 0 3.30 2.55 12.16 5.00 1.30 13.00 4.28 7.00 3.61 

Carlinville Water

Works 2009 28 0 3.91 3.13 21.38 5.00 2.50 11.00 5.12 7.00 3.65 

Carlinville Water

Works 2010 33 0 4.81 3.43 47.16 5.00 0.51 13.00 9.79 9.00 2.45 

Carlinville Water

Works 2011 50 0 3.65 3.07 25.65 8.00 1.59 19.00 5.92 13.00 2.42 

Carthage PublicUtilities 2003 26 0 1.55 1.11 2.64 0.00 0.00 12.00 1.48 8.00 1.77 Carthage PublicUtilities 2004 32 0 1.36 1.26 3.09 6.00 0.36 13.00 1.05 8.00 2.47 Carthage PublicUtilities 2005 34 0 3.97 3.41 11.70 7.00 0.39 13.00 5.45 9.00 4.57 Carthage PublicUtilities 2006 30 0 1.90 1.70 4.67 7.00 3.41 13.00 1.48 9.00 1.66 Centralia WaterTreatment Plant 2003 28 0 4.68 2.87 33.49 0.00 0.00 14.00 6.38 8.00 2.89 Centralia WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 2.68 2.16 6.68 6.00 0.87 13.00 3.92 8.00 3.25 Centralia WaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 4.07 3.09 15.27 7.00 0.41 13.00 7.73 9.00 3.43 
94 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Centralia WaterTreatment Plant 2006 34 0 3.33 2.81 12.33 7.00 1.50 13.00 5.25 8.00 2.93 Centralia WaterTreatment Plant 2007 34 0 5.64 4.52 15.17 7.00 3.70 13.00 10.40 9.00 2.39 Centralia WaterTreatment Plant 2008 32 0 2.84 2.40 7.60 7.00 2.77 12.00 3.96 8.00 1.96 Centralia WaterTreatment Plant 2009 33 0 2.78 2.52 5.74 6.00 2.85 12.00 3.28 8.00 2.10 Centralia WaterTreatment Plant 2010 33 0 2.70 2.19 9.80 5.00 1.13 13.00 4.17 9.00 1.55 Centralia WaterTreatmentPlant‐‐RaccoonLake 2008 7 0 3.72 1.19 9.43 0.00 0.00 6.00 3.37 1.00 1.08 Centralia WaterTreatmentPlant‐‐RaccoonLake Not enough data for 2011City of Waverly 2003 24 0 4.65 2.93 20.92 0.00 0.00 12.00 5.44 6.00 3.76 City of Waverly 2004 33 0 3.00 2.73 8.00 6.00 0.93 13.00 3.60 8.00 3.73 City of Waverly 2005 35 0 2.16 1.99 5.98 7.00 0.60 13.00 2.30 9.00 3.65 City of Waverly 2006 34 0 2.14 2.10 6.91 7.00 1.13 13.00 2.07 8.00 3.33 City of Waverly 2007 25 0 1.37 1.32 1.97 6.00 1.29 10.00 1.49 5.00 1.45 City of Waverly 2008 26 0 1.91 1.46 12.03 6.00 0.73 10.00 2.48 7.00 2.20 City of Waverly 2009 28 0 2.92 1.95 8.54 6.00 0.64 11.00 4.06 7.00 2.56 City of Waverly 2010 18 0 1.43 1.09 5.40 1.00 0.32 8.00 2.63 4.00 0.94 City of Waverly 2011 21 0 1.51 1.17 5.44 3.00 0.46 9.00 2.67 6.00 0.86 CoultervilleWaterTreatment Plant 2003 27 0 8.61 6.13 33.16 0.00 0.00 13.00 4.62 8.00 18.14 CoultervilleWaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 2.60 2.42 5.05 6.00 0.98 13.00 2.62 8.00 3.79 
95 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

CoultervilleWaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 0.78 0.75 1.98 7.00 0.97 13.00 0.77 9.00 0.64 CoultervilleWaterTreatment Plant 2006 35 0 2.10 1.67 8.34 7.00 1.33 13.00 3.34 9.00 1.54 CoultervilleWaterTreatment Plant 2007 35 0 3.39 2.92 8.83 7.00 0.48 13.00 4.64 9.00 3.86 CoultervilleWaterTreatment Plant 2008 32 0 4.35 3.27 44.22 6.00 1.84 13.00 7.16 8.00 2.61 CoultervilleWaterTreatment Plant 2009 26 0 4.85 3.71 16.26 5.00 1.43 13.00 2.63 7.00 9.89 CoultervilleWaterTreatment Plant 2010 20 0 2.66 1.39 5.38 0.00 0.00 6.00 1.71 9.00 2.50 CoultervilleWaterTreatment Plant 2011 32 0 2.11 1.92 5.97 4.00 0.78 13.00 1.45 9.00 3.42 Evansville Not enough data for 2003Evansville 2004 33 0 4.07 2.98 35.33 6.00 0.80 13.00 8.17 8.00 2.01 Evansville 2005 35 0 4.58 3.41 35.86 7.00 0.76 13.00 9.51 9.00 2.30 Evansville 2006 34 0 3.80 2.79 25.07 7.00 1.38 13.00 7.65 9.00 1.33 Evansville 2007 35 0 3.83 3.19 16.37 7.00 2.61 13.00 6.52 9.00 2.69 Evansville 2008 25 0 3.59 2.48 18.91 6.00 2.05 11.00 5.25 5.00 2.07 Evansville 2009 26 0 3.37 2.01 13.55 0.00 0.00 12.00 4.07 8.00 2.63 Evansville 2010 33 0 3.82 2.78 19.28 5.00 1.31 13.00 6.86 9.00 1.94 Evansville 2011 32 0 3.15 2.72 14.50 4.00 2.84 13.00 4.81 9.00 1.95 Fairfield 2010 22 0 2.08 1.22 5.41 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.93 6.00 2.26 Fairfield 2011 39 0 2.73 2.78 8.20 6.00 4.05 13.00 3.23 7.00 1.96 Farina WaterTreatment Plant 2003 26 0 1.64 1.12 2.65 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.59 8.00 1.61 
96 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Farina WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 1.63 1.58 3.35 6.00 2.29 13.00 1.60 8.00 1.48 Farina WaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 2.50 2.29 10.08 7.00 1.14 13.00 2.20 9.00 2.83 Farina WaterTreatment Plant 2006 32 0 5.74 5.22 10.50 7.00 8.34 13.00 5.04 8.00 4.30 Farina WaterTreatment Plant 2007 42 0 4.75 4.95 12.15 7.00 7.40 13.00 5.04 9.00 3.58 Farina WaterTreatment Plant 2008 33 0 6.03 5.28 9.78 6.00 4.81 10.00 5.88 8.00 6.24 Farina WaterTreatment Plant 2009 39 0 5.17 5.80 16.88 6.00 11.65 13.00 4.37 7.00 4.18 Farina WaterTreatment Plant 2010 41 0 5.32 4.83 9.05 6.00 3.94 13.00 6.80 9.00 3.40 Farina WaterTreatment Plant 2011 39 0 5.78 5.72 10.52 6.00 8.11 13.00 5.61 8.00 3.44 Flora WaterTreatment Plant 2004 26 0 2.49 1.56 12.74 0.00 0.00 12.00 3.34 8.00 1.68 Flora WaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 4.07 3.75 27.91 7.00 0.57 13.00 5.42 9.00 1.27 Flora WaterTreatment Plant 2006 33 0 4.93 4.29 19.61 5.00 1.94 13.00 5.90 9.00 0.97 Flora WaterTreatment Plant 2007 42 0 4.65 4.43 36.14 7.00 5.32 13.00 8.57 9.00 1.27 Flora WaterTreatment Plant 2008 20 0 6.36 2.99 30.56 6.00 3.74 13.00 7.57 1.00 0.48 Gillespie Water

Treatment Plant 2003 27 0 3.51 2.37 7.23 0.00 0.00 13.00 3.79 8.00 3.33 

Gillespie Water

Treatment Plant 2004 33 0 4.08 3.63 21.01 6.00 1.50 13.00 5.03 8.00 4.74 

Gillespie Water

Treatment Plant 2005 35 0 0.96 0.92 2.66 7.00 0.62 13.00 0.90 9.00 1.46 

Gillespie Water

Treatment Plant 2006 35 0 2.10 1.86 6.05 7.00 1.39 13.00 2.84 9.00 1.93 

Gillespie Water

Treatment Plant 2007 35 0 4.13 3.84 11.41 7.00 3.79 13.00 4.78 9.00 3.85 

Gillespie Water

Treatment Plant 2008 31 0 3.86 3.12 15.57 6.00 1.88 13.00 4.75 7.00 4.32 
97 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Gillespie Water

Treatment Plant 2009 7 0 5.69 1.50 6.31 6.00 4.99 1.00 0.68 0.00 0.00 

GreenfieldWaterTreatment Plant 2003 27 0 3.04 2.22 4.43 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.40 8.00 3.74 GreenfieldWaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 1.70 1.65 2.49 6.00 1.91 13.00 1.59 8.00 1.81 GreenfieldWaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 0.53 0.51 1.32 7.00 0.57 13.00 0.49 9.00 0.60 GreenfieldWaterTreatment Plant 2006 29 0 0.10 0.11 0.31 7.00 0.05 12.00 0.09 9.00 0.14 Hettick WaterSupply 2003 15 0 4.38 2.84 12.73 0.00 0.00 10.00 2.42 5.00 8.66 Hettick WaterSupply Not enough data for 2004Highland WaterTreatment Plant 2003 27 0 2.75 2.20 7.72 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.71 8.00 4.33 Highland WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 2.08 2.09 4.05 6.00 0.70 13.00 1.82 8.00 3.33 Highland WaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 0.72 0.69 2.03 7.00 0.49 13.00 0.58 9.00 1.16 Highland WaterTreatment Plant 2006 29 0 1.83 1.55 3.28 7.00 1.60 13.00 1.50 8.00 2.56 Hillsboro 2007 41 0 1.65 1.62 2.57 6.00 1.45 13.00 1.51 9.00 1.89 Hillsboro 2008 35 0 1.91 1.81 5.18 6.00 1.51 12.00 1.82 8.00 3.06 Hillsboro 2010 40 0 2.43 2.07 19.55 5.00 0.71 13.00 4.82 9.00 1.63 Hillsboro‐ GlennShoals 2003 19 0 4.55 2.51 21.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 2.81 9.00 4.21 Hillsboro‐ GlennShoals 2004 28 0 1.14 1.09 2.37 5.00 0.84 13.00 0.97 7.00 1.79 Hillsboro‐ GlennShoals 2005 23 0 1.93 1.75 4.17 5.00 0.42 10.00 2.27 5.00 2.64 Hillsboro‐ Glenn 2006 27 0 1.70 1.47 7.23 6.00 1.07 10.00 1.99 6.00 1.84 
98 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

ShoalsHillsboro‐ GlennShoals 2009 40 0 2.71 2.65 5.94 6.00 2.39 13.00 3.20 8.00 2.86 Hillsboro‐ GlennShoals 2011 40 0 2.05 1.94 5.90 6.00 1.51 13.00 2.53 8.00 1.96 Hillsboro‐‐Lake 2003 15 0 6.91 3.32 16.46 0.00 0.00 4.00 4.37 9.00 4.58 Hillsboro‐‐Lake Not enough data for 2004Hillsboro‐‐Lake Not enough data for 2006Holiday ShoresSanitary District 2003 24 0 4.04 2.71 6.60 0.00 0.00 10.00 2.93 8.00 4.77 Holiday ShoresSanitary District 2004 33 0 3.19 3.03 5.92 6.00 2.26 13.00 3.20 8.00 3.61 Holiday ShoresSanitary District 2005 35 0 1.86 1.80 6.42 7.00 2.29 13.00 2.01 9.00 1.81 Holiday ShoresSanitary District 2006 30 0 0.98 0.83 1.93 7.00 1.21 13.00 0.81 9.00 1.06 Kaskaskia WaterDistrict 2003 27 0 3.67 2.31 21.99 0.00 0.00 13.00 4.62 8.00 2.97 Kaskaskia WaterDistrict 2004 33 0 3.29 2.46 27.75 6.00 0.91 13.00 6.55 8.00 1.55 Kaskaskia WaterDistrict 2005 35 0 5.63 4.09 70.61 7.00 0.73 13.00 12.85 9.00 1.70 Kaskaskia WaterDistrict 2006 35 0 3.22 2.56 19.47 7.00 1.82 13.00 5.83 9.00 1.56 Kaskaskia WaterDistrict 2007 35 0 4.55 3.52 25.90 7.00 2.42 13.00 8.79 9.00 1.89 Kaskaskia WaterDistrict 2008 30 0 3.42 2.51 16.53 6.00 2.22 12.00 5.02 8.00 2.19 Kaskaskia WaterDistrict 2009 34 0 3.39 2.83 10.60 6.00 2.74 13.00 4.74 8.00 2.62 Kaskaskia WaterDistrict 2010 33 0 3.95 2.91 19.11 5.00 1.29 13.00 7.53 9.00 1.82 Kaskaskia WaterDistrict 2011 34 0 3.33 2.75 15.55 6.00 2.48 13.00 5.19 9.00 2.04 Kinkaid AreaWater System 2003 27 0 2.55 1.87 4.76 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.95 8.00 3.01 Kinkaid AreaWater System 2004 33 0 2.71 2.55 5.88 6.00 1.87 13.00 2.89 8.00 2.84 
99 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Kinkaid AreaWater System 2005 35 0 1.48 1.39 3.46 7.00 1.65 13.00 1.82 9.00 1.43 Kinkaid AreaWater System 2006 34 0 0.55 0.54 1.27 7.00 0.78 12.00 0.59 9.00 0.48 Kinkaid AreaWater System 2007 34 0 0.64 0.63 0.84 7.00 0.64 13.00 0.62 9.00 0.67 Kinkaid AreaWater System 2008 32 0 0.82 0.74 1.82 6.00 0.52 13.00 0.73 8.00 0.90 Kinkaid AreaWater System 2009 7 0 0.92 0.35 1.06 6.00 0.85 1.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 Mattoon 2007 25 0 1.52 1.01 2.42 0.00 0.00 12.00 1.63 8.00 1.35 Mattoon 2008 32 0 3.09 2.74 7.29 6.00 5.16 13.00 3.56 8.00 1.40 Mattoon 2009 32 0 5.06 4.93 19.12 6.00 9.68 12.00 2.82 7.00 2.94 Mattoon 2010 31 0 2.86 2.64 10.81 5.00 5.59 12.00 3.21 8.00 0.76 Mattoon 2011 34 0 2.69 2.57 8.18 6.00 4.17 13.00 2.71 9.00 1.62 Mt. Olive Water

Works 2003 25 0 15.41 9.62 30.88 0.00 0.00 11.00 13.16 8.00 17.98 

Mt. Olive Water

Works 2004 33 0 4.18 3.82 12.80 6.00 3.28 13.00 4.59 8.00 4.80 

Mt. Olive Water

Works 2005 35 0 0.66 0.66 2.28 7.00 0.79 13.00 0.75 9.00 0.69 

Mt. Olive Water

Works 2006 35 0 3.35 3.26 10.48 7.00 0.34 13.00 3.02 9.00 6.54 

Mt. Olive Water

Works 2007 35 0 6.27 5.69 13.58 7.00 2.75 13.00 7.60 9.00 7.61 

Mt. Olive Water

Works 2008 32 0 6.38 5.03 34.10 6.00 3.73 13.00 6.98 8.00 7.61 

Mt. Olive Water

Works 2009 34 0 2.75 2.48 6.84 6.00 1.47 13.00 2.87 8.00 3.88 

Mt. Olive Water

Works 2010 34 0 1.20 1.07 2.11 6.00 0.66 13.00 1.38 9.00 1.31 

Mt. Olive Water

Works 2011 35 0 1.06 0.97 2.33 6.00 0.65 13.00 1.06 10.00 1.35 

Mt. Olive Water

Works (New

Lake) 2005 4 0 1.45 0.33 1.91 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.38 2.00 0.57 Nashville Water 2003 21 0 5.10 2.77 27.76 0.00 0.00 7.00 4.18 8.00 3.67 
100 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

PlantNashville Water

Plant 2004 33 0 3.46 2.97 8.34 6.00 2.25 13.00 4.49 8.00 3.60 

Nashville Water

Plant 2005 35 0 3.00 2.56 9.50 7.00 0.47 13.00 4.40 9.00 4.04 

Nashville Water

Plant 2006 35 0 4.80 3.80 31.62 7.00 1.01 13.00 8.48 9.00 3.86 

Nashville Water

Plant 2007 35 0 1.77 1.70 2.67 7.00 1.73 13.00 1.92 9.00 1.81 

Nashville Water

Plant 2008 31 0 9.47 6.37 69.04 5.00 1.07 13.00 18.51 8.00 4.44 

Nashville Water

Plant 2009 15 0 6.19 1.97 19.51 6.00 0.98 9.00 6.68 0.00 0.00 

New Berlin Not enough data for 2003New Berlin 2004 29 0 0.56 0.52 0.91 4.00 0.62 12.00 0.58 8.00 0.52 New Berlin 2005 34 0 0.44 0.40 2.05 7.00 0.25 13.00 0.59 9.00 0.40 New Berlin 2006 27 0 0.20 0.19 0.47 5.00 0.14 12.00 0.16 9.00 0.29 New Berlin 2007 30 0 0.48 0.46 0.62 5.00 0.43 12.00 0.49 9.00 0.51 New Berlin 2008 19 0 0.70 0.65 1.00 4.00 0.56 10.00 0.72 3.00 0.80 New Berlin 2009 26 0 0.85 0.82 1.40 6.00 0.46 12.00 0.81 5.00 1.16 New Berlin 2010 25 0 0.78 0.79 1.11 5.00 0.67 11.00 0.84 3.00 0.92 New Berlin 2011 33 0 0.98 0.91 1.36 6.00 0.63 12.00 1.10 9.00 1.03 Otter LakeWaterCommission 2003 26 0 1.87 1.33 5.89 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.98 7.00 1.75 Otter LakeWaterCommission 2004 33 0 1.27 1.23 2.32 6.00 1.41 13.00 1.34 8.00 0.95 Otter LakeWaterCommission 2005 34 0 1.80 1.46 5.58 7.00 0.51 13.00 2.43 8.00 2.13 Otter LakeWaterCommission 2006 28 0 0.76 0.63 1.31 7.00 1.05 11.00 0.61 9.00 0.68 
101 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Palmyra‐Modesto WaterCommission 2003 20 0 5.05 2.94 7.22 0.00 0.00 7.00 3.22 8.00 5.15 Palmyra‐Modesto WaterCommission 2004 31 0 3.25 3.10 4.89 6.00 2.92 11.00 3.14 8.00 3.72 Palmyra‐Modesto WaterCommission 2005 35 0 1.33 1.22 3.91 7.00 0.84 13.00 1.27 9.00 1.95 Palmyra‐Modesto WaterCommission 2006 30 0 0.77 0.65 1.45 7.00 0.93 13.00 0.74 9.00 0.68 Paris Not enough data for 2003Paris 2004 33 0 2.44 2.17 11.15 6.00 0.46 13.00 2.61 8.00 3.95 Paris 2005 33 0 0.94 0.84 3.34 6.00 0.45 12.00 1.23 9.00 1.16 Paris 2006 35 0 4.16 3.40 29.25 7.00 0.46 13.00 6.93 9.00 3.73 Paris 2007 32 0 1.46 1.45 3.25 6.00 2.30 12.00 1.30 9.00 1.06 Paris 2008 30 0 3.00 2.61 6.99 6.00 2.51 12.00 3.02 8.00 3.38 Paris 2009 26 0 3.12 2.36 16.34 6.00 1.47 11.00 3.99 6.00 2.76 Paris Not enough data for 2010Patoka‐‐ EastReservoir 2006 17 0 2.97 1.30 7.66 2.00 0.63 13.00 2.69 2.00 1.66 Patoka‐‐ N ForkKaskaskia River 2006 15 0 5.70 2.04 23.59 3.00 1.19 10.00 6.49 2.00 0.37 Patoka‐‐WestReservoir 2006 16 0 10.44 4.53 26.32 2.00 5.96 12.00 10.14 2.00 1.82 Pittsfield WaterTreatment Plant 2003 27 0 3.36 2.48 5.31 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.59 8.00 4.38 Pittsfield WaterTreatment Plant 2004 34 0 2.00 1.92 3.02 6.00 2.19 13.00 1.99 8.00 2.13 Pittsfield WaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 0.71 0.66 5.20 7.00 0.60 13.00 0.60 9.00 1.05 Pittsfield WaterTreatment Plant 2006 29 0 0.28 0.25 0.75 7.00 0.20 12.00 0.21 9.00 0.42 
102 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Salem WaterTreatment Plant 2003 26 0 2.33 1.94 13.17 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.77 7.00 3.81 Salem WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 1.42 1.23 4.16 6.00 0.44 13.00 1.79 8.00 2.09 Salem WaterTreatment Plant 2005 34 0 2.09 1.91 10.66 7.00 0.55 13.00 2.04 8.00 1.86 Salem WaterTreatment Plant 2006 30 0 6.98 5.31 14.75 7.00 8.88 13.00 8.74 9.00 3.40 Springfield CityWater, Light,and Power 2003 27 0 2.78 2.17 5.17 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.50 8.00 4.07 Springfield CityWater, Light,and Power 2004 33 0 1.92 1.96 3.39 6.00 2.02 13.00 1.23 8.00 2.77 Springfield CityWater, Light,and Power 2005 35 0 0.94 0.94 1.95 7.00 1.03 13.00 0.68 9.00 1.41 Springfield CityWater, Light,and Power 2006 30 0 0.77 0.67 1.68 7.00 0.53 13.00 0.55 9.00 1.31 Vermont Water

Treatment Plant 2003 27 0 4.81 3.39 7.93 0.00 0.00 13.00 4.59 8.00 5.23 

Vermont Water

Treatment Plant 2004 33 0 1.85 1.80 3.07 6.00 1.92 13.00 1.60 8.00 2.28 

Vermont Water

Treatment Plant 2005 35 0 2.26 1.99 4.29 7.00 0.51 13.00 3.15 9.00 2.76 

Vermont Water

Treatment Plant 2006 35 0 0.87 0.89 2.12 7.00 1.48 13.00 0.72 9.00 0.91 

Vermont Water

Treatment Plant 2007 35 0 3.19 2.73 11.52 7.00 0.53 13.00 4.62 9.00 3.44 

Vermont Water

Treatment Plant 2008 32 0 1.37 1.27 4.49 7.00 1.33 13.00 1.19 7.00 2.01 

Vermont Water

Treatment Plant 2009 34 0 5.54 4.31 47.02 6.00 0.42 13.00 10.32 8.00 2.97 

Vermont Water

Treatment Plant 2010 34 0 2.92 2.20 17.27 6.00 1.28 13.00 5.93 9.00 1.05 
103 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Vermont Water

Treatment Plant 2011 34 0 3.59 2.94 12.94 6.00 0.50 13.00 5.45 9.00 3.43 

Wayne City SideChannel 2003 7 0 1.77 0.37 2.07 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.71 2.00 0.41 Wayne CitySkillet Creek 2003 27 0 6.40 3.57 46.22 0.00 0.00 13.00 10.00 8.00 2.96 Wayne CitySkillet Creek 2004 32 0 4.60 3.17 29.33 6.00 0.81 13.00 8.97 8.00 2.50 Wayne CitySkillet Creek 2005 35 0 4.13 3.16 23.26 7.00 0.54 13.00 7.14 9.00 2.44 Wayne CitySkillet Creek 2006 34 0 3.03 2.77 17.03 7.00 1.36 12.00 6.14 9.00 1.20 Wayne CitySkillet Creek 2007 35 0 3.47 2.79 20.40 7.00 1.49 13.00 6.28 9.00 1.47 Wayne CitySkillet Creek 2008 29 0 4.52 4.76 23.98 6.00 2.98 11.00 8.14 7.00 6.07 Wayne CitySkillet Creek 2009 15 0 4.98 1.76 23.56 6.00 2.50 9.00 4.31 0.00 0.00 Batesville Water

Treatment Plant 2003 26 0 2.79 2.24 5.27 0.00 0.00 12.00 1.18 8.00 4.42 

Batesville Water

Treatment Plant 2004 33 0 2.11 2.17 4.57 6.00 1.42 13.00 0.99 8.00 3.68 

Batesville Water

Treatment Plant 2005 35 0 1.83 1.72 4.18 7.00 1.83 13.00 1.52 9.00 2.51 

Batesville Water

Treatment Plant 2006 35 0 2.22 2.24 6.57 7.00 1.38 13.00 1.14 9.00 4.67 

Batesville Water

Treatment Plant 2007 35 0 1.08 1.10 2.07 7.00 1.43 13.00 0.92 9.00 1.15 

Batesville Water

Treatment Plant 2008 31 0 3.39 3.06 10.07 6.00 1.85 12.00 2.45 8.00 5.38 

Batesville Water

Treatment Plant 2009 33 0 1.75 1.70 3.21 5.00 2.44 13.00 1.96 8.00 1.28 

Batesville Water

Treatment Plant 2010 30 0 3.89 3.27 7.04 3.00 2.46 12.00 4.85 9.00 3.49 

Batesville Water

Treatment Plant 2011 35 0 1.53 1.44 2.89 7.00 1.98 13.00 1.48 9.00 1.18 
104 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Bedford WaterDepartment 2003 25 0 1.98 1.11 6.49 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.31 8.00 1.59 Bedford WaterDepartment 2004 33 0 1.84 1.29 9.77 6.00 0.33 13.00 3.42 8.00 1.07 Bedford WaterDepartment 2005 34 0 3.15 2.35 36.87 6.00 0.43 13.00 6.63 9.00 0.98 Bedford WaterDepartment 2006 35 0 2.79 2.12 27.65 7.00 0.54 13.00 5.98 9.00 0.74 Bedford WaterDepartment 2007 35 0 1.06 0.86 12.44 7.00 0.53 13.00 1.93 9.00 0.59 Bedford WaterDepartment 2008 32 0 1.97 1.45 13.95 6.00 0.87 13.00 3.55 8.00 1.05 Bedford WaterDepartment 2009 34 0 1.84 1.42 11.97 6.00 0.54 13.00 3.66 8.00 0.86 Bedford WaterDepartment 2010 34 0 1.85 1.37 10.02 6.00 0.56 13.00 3.87 9.00 0.61 Bedford WaterDepartment 2011 138 0 2.35 1.32 20.53 6.00 0.58 90.00 3.15 36.00 0.65 Fort Wayne‐Three RiverFiltration Plant 2003 26 0 2.23 1.29 8.71 0.00 0.00 12.00 3.41 8.00 1.23 Fort Wayne‐Three RiverFiltration Plant 2004 33 0 1.74 1.28 9.45 6.00 0.32 13.00 3.11 8.00 1.29 Fort Wayne‐Three RiverFiltration Plant 2005 35 0 0.87 0.73 2.56 7.00 0.40 13.00 1.21 9.00 0.91 Fort Wayne‐Three RiverFiltration Plant 2006 29 0 0.85 0.90 4.99 7.00 0.11 7.00 2.52 9.00 0.75 Fort Wayne‐Three RiverFiltration Plant 2007 35 0 1.03 0.85 4.43 7.00 0.53 13.00 1.71 9.00 0.80 Fort Wayne‐Three RiverFiltration Plant 2008 30 0 1.26 0.89 11.40 6.00 0.36 11.00 1.83 8.00 0.99 Fort Wayne‐Three RiverFiltration Plant 2009 8 0 0.73 0.33 2.31 6.00 0.48 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.29 
105 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Indianapolis‐‐Eagle CreekWaterTreatment Plant 2003 25 0 3.53 2.11 18.97 0.00 0.00 12.00 4.80 7.00 2.45 Indianapolis‐‐Eagle CreekWaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 1.35 1.30 2.71 6.00 0.48 13.00 1.04 8.00 2.07 Indianapolis‐‐Eagle CreekWaterTreatment Plant 2005 34 0 3.33 2.66 8.68 7.00 0.45 13.00 5.40 9.00 3.51 Indianapolis‐‐Eagle CreekWaterTreatment Plant 2006 33 0 0.97 0.98 3.18 7.00 0.66 12.00 0.88 8.00 1.36 JasperMunicipal Water 2003 27 0 0.96 0.63 4.53 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.37 8.00 0.60 JasperMunicipal Water 2004 33 0 1.37 1.07 11.31 6.00 0.41 13.00 2.28 8.00 1.02 JasperMunicipal Water 2005 34 0 0.93 0.76 5.97 7.00 0.51 13.00 1.68 9.00 0.50 JasperMunicipal Water 2006 35 0 0.26 0.20 1.48 7.00 0.05 13.00 0.44 9.00 0.26 JasperMunicipal Water 2007 35 0 0.43 0.41 0.97 7.00 0.39 13.00 0.46 9.00 0.44 JasperMunicipal Water 2008 32 0 0.53 0.45 3.71 6.00 0.32 13.00 0.71 8.00 0.42 JasperMunicipal Water 2009 7 0 0.40 0.22 0.44 6.00 0.37 1.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 Logansport Not enough data for 2003Logansport 2004 33 0 2.07 1.50 26.80 6.00 0.57 13.00 4.16 8.00 0.98 Logansport 2005 35 0 1.30 1.01 19.44 7.00 0.46 13.00 2.51 9.00 0.76 Logansport 2006 35 0 1.29 0.96 15.98 7.00 0.27 13.00 2.82 9.00 0.55 Logansport 2007 35 0 0.77 0.67 2.90 7.00 0.58 13.00 1.19 9.00 0.52 Logansport 2008 31 0 2.50 1.66 33.32 6.00 0.55 13.00 5.07 8.00 0.73 
106 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Logansport 2009 34 0 0.97 0.79 4.73 6.00 0.49 13.00 1.70 8.00 0.53 Logansport 2010 34 0 1.60 1.18 8.85 6.00 0.41 13.00 3.30 9.00 0.64 Logansport 2011 34 0 1.19 0.93 12.03 6.00 0.47 13.00 2.20 9.00 0.54 Logansport 1899 1 0 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Logansport 2006 35 0 1.29 0.96 15.98 7.00 0.27 13.00 2.82 9.00 0.55 Logansport 2010 34 0 1.60 1.18 8.85 6.00 0.41 13.00 3.30 9.00 0.64 Mitchell WaterPlant 2005 28 0 2.53 1.58 22.75 0.00 0.00 13.00 4.71 9.00 1.10 Mitchell WaterPlant 2006 34 0 2.34 1.75 24.37 7.00 0.46 13.00 5.22 9.00 0.62 Mitchell WaterPlant 2007 32 0 1.09 0.92 8.33 6.00 0.95 13.00 1.66 8.00 0.68 Mitchell WaterPlant 2008 28 0 1.78 1.28 8.82 6.00 0.77 11.00 3.04 8.00 0.99 Mitchell WaterPlant 2009 28 0 1.83 1.28 10.67 2.00 0.35 12.00 3.13 6.00 0.87 Mitchell WaterPlant 2010 17 0 2.36 0.96 14.63 5.00 0.49 11.00 3.04 1.00 0.18 North Vernon 2007 21 0 1.95 1.09 3.93 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.58 8.00 1.86 North Vernon 2008 28 0 3.44 2.42 14.13 7.00 1.28 11.00 4.60 6.00 3.18 North Vernon 2009 33 0 2.65 2.01 16.23 6.00 0.80 13.00 3.98 7.00 1.29 North Vernon 2010 34 0 2.41 2.09 8.48 6.00 1.40 12.00 3.78 10.00 1.42 North Vernon 2011 136 0 3.97 2.56 30.44 6.00 1.07 88.00 5.02 36.00 1.53 Santee UtilitiesInc. 2003 23 0 4.94 3.03 18.20 0.00 0.00 9.00 3.20 8.00 7.05 Santee UtilitiesInc. 2004 33 0 2.26 2.11 5.10 6.00 0.39 13.00 2.13 8.00 4.14 Santee UtilitiesInc. 2005 35 0 4.41 3.74 36.71 7.00 0.58 13.00 6.77 9.00 5.20 Santee UtilitiesInc. 2006 35 0 4.37 3.71 17.82 7.00 2.57 13.00 5.64 9.00 4.72 Santee UtilitiesInc. 1899 1 0 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 
107 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Santee UtilitiesInc. 2003 23 0 4.94 3.03 18.20 0.00 0.00 9.00 3.20 8.00 7.05 Santee UtilitiesInc. 2005 35 0 4.41 3.74 36.71 7.00 0.58 13.00 6.77 9.00 5.20 Stucker ForkWaterTreatment Plant 2003 26 0 1.06 0.70 2.91 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.40 9.00 0.88 Stucker ForkWaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 2.54 1.92 14.97 6.00 0.33 13.00 4.23 8.00 2.27 Stucker ForkWaterTreatment Plant 2005 32 0 3.30 2.43 21.54 6.00 0.41 12.00 6.24 9.00 1.55 Stucker ForkWaterTreatment Plant 2006 34 0 2.33 1.76 26.72 7.00 0.44 12.00 4.53 9.00 1.62 Stucker ForkWaterTreatment Plant 2007 41 0 1.58 1.31 11.82 7.00 0.53 12.00 3.26 9.00 0.92 Stucker ForkWaterTreatment Plant 2008 37 0 2.16 1.70 14.01 7.00 0.50 13.00 3.67 8.00 2.09 Stucker ForkWaterTreatment Plant 2009 37 0 2.11 1.74 20.25 6.00 0.45 13.00 4.78 6.00 1.30 Stucker ForkWaterTreatment Plant 2011 38 0 1.77 1.49 25.48 6.00 0.44 12.00 3.75 7.00 1.11 Stucker ForkWater Utility 2008 37 0 2.16 1.70 14.01 7.00 0.50 13.00 3.67 8.00 2.09 Stucker ForkWater Utility 2010 37 0 2.80 2.31 30.37 5.00 0.37 13.00 6.39 6.00 1.54 Versailles WaterWorks 2003 26 0 3.55 2.04 27.54 0.00 0.00 12.00 4.82 10.00 2.23 Versailles WaterWorks 2004 31 0 2.73 1.95 14.39 5.00 0.51 13.00 3.94 8.00 2.57 Versailles WaterWorks 2005 35 0 7.22 5.31 33.48 7.00 0.37 13.00 14.62 9.00 4.29 Versailles WaterWorks 2006 29 0 4.56 3.37 38.07 7.00 1.02 10.00 7.08 8.00 3.86 
108 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Versailles WaterWorks 2007 33 0 1.09 1.00 3.44 6.00 0.72 13.00 1.15 8.00 1.49 Versailles WaterWorks 2008 29 0 1.93 1.45 14.31 6.00 0.48 12.00 2.25 6.00 2.35 Versailles WaterWorks 2009 29 0 1.75 1.56 17.86 6.00 0.52 12.00 2.93 5.00 1.94 Versailles WaterWorks 2010 31 0 1.57 1.26 5.87 5.00 0.96 13.00 2.40 7.00 1.12 Versailles WaterWorks 2011 33 0 1.76 1.52 7.26 6.00 0.60 12.00 1.31 9.00 2.62 Westport WaterCompany 2003 24 0 1.10 1.07 5.90 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.36 7.00 1.49 Westport WaterCompany 2004 31 0 1.31 1.15 3.42 5.00 0.73 13.00 1.62 7.00 1.35 Westport WaterCompany 2005 32 0 1.02 0.88 2.82 6.00 0.71 12.00 1.19 9.00 1.01 Westport WaterCompany 2006 32 0 1.05 0.88 3.62 5.00 0.39 12.00 1.29 9.00 1.17 Westport WaterCompany 2007 34 0 2.31 1.78 29.11 7.00 0.80 13.00 4.45 8.00 1.00 Westport WaterCompany 2008 29 0 1.00 0.96 1.79 4.00 0.87 13.00 0.89 8.00 1.14 Westport WaterCompany 2009 27 0 0.84 0.72 1.25 3.00 0.35 11.00 0.75 7.00 1.08 Westport WaterCompany 2010 32 0 0.97 0.87 1.92 6.00 0.63 13.00 1.15 9.00 1.02 Westport WaterCompany 2011 34 0 1.00 0.94 1.93 6.00 0.65 13.00 0.89 9.00 1.28 Winslow WaterWorks 2003 26 0 2.74 1.53 29.39 0.00 0.00 13.00 4.32 8.00 1.24 Winslow WaterWorks 2004 33 0 2.84 2.04 22.20 6.00 0.34 13.00 6.11 8.00 1.28 Winslow WaterWorks 2005 32 0 2.67 1.96 15.90 7.00 0.41 13.00 5.29 8.00 1.76 Winslow WaterWorks 2006 34 0 1.89 1.25 18.97 6.00 0.13 13.00 4.21 9.00 0.55 Winslow WaterWorks 2007 34 0 0.74 0.61 5.38 7.00 0.40 13.00 1.16 9.00 0.58 Winslow WaterWorks 2008 33 0 1.39 1.02 8.74 7.00 0.38 13.00 2.49 8.00 0.77 
109 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Winslow WaterWorks 2009 34 0 2.05 1.72 10.34 6.00 0.37 13.00 3.71 8.00 2.35 Winslow WaterWorks 2010 32 0 4.31 2.82 54.65 4.00 0.36 13.00 9.86 9.00 0.65 Winslow WaterWorks 2011 33 0 0.94 0.74 3.79 6.00 0.36 13.00 1.51 8.00 0.70 Altoona 2004 19 0 0.74 0.42 2.07 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.83 6.00 0.47 Altoona 2005 35 0 0.71 0.63 2.60 7.00 0.60 13.00 0.92 9.00 0.61 Altoona 2006 35 0 0.79 0.56 10.18 7.00 0.05 13.00 1.96 9.00 0.17 Altoona 2007 29 0 0.80 0.60 4.02 7.00 0.42 13.00 1.29 3.00 0.36 Altoona 2008 30 0 0.70 0.54 2.96 6.00 0.35 12.00 1.14 8.00 0.40 Altoona 2009 30 0 0.72 0.55 2.85 6.00 0.33 13.00 1.15 7.00 0.46 Atchison Not enough data for 2003Atchison 2004 33 0 0.92 0.73 3.31 6.00 0.36 13.00 1.51 8.00 0.75 Atchison 2005 32 0 1.14 0.85 6.93 6.00 0.41 13.00 1.90 8.00 0.75 Atchison 2006 34 0 0.29 0.21 4.82 6.00 0.07 13.00 0.63 9.00 0.07 Atchison 2007 35 0 1.23 0.97 6.99 7.00 0.45 13.00 2.42 9.00 0.65 Atchison 2008 32 0 1.39 1.01 7.93 7.00 0.42 12.00 2.62 8.00 0.66 Atchison 2009 34 0 1.05 0.82 9.70 6.00 0.37 13.00 2.05 8.00 0.51 Atchison 2010 34 0 1.35 1.05 4.74 6.00 0.42 13.00 2.45 9.00 0.87 Atchison 2011 124 0 1.09 0.70 5.41 6.00 0.40 83.00 1.27 29.00 0.60 Baxter SpringsWaterTreatment Plant 2005 28 0 3.95 2.24 58.45 0.00 0.00 13.00 8.04 9.00 0.49 Baxter SpringsWaterTreatment Plant 2006 35 0 0.31 0.22 2.09 7.00 0.05 13.00 0.67 9.00 0.11 Baxter SpringsWaterTreatment Plant 2007 35 0 1.34 0.97 16.30 7.00 0.39 13.00 2.70 9.00 0.46 
110 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Baxter SpringsWaterTreatment Plant 2008 33 0 1.38 0.96 13.00 7.00 0.34 13.00 2.57 8.00 0.57 Baxter SpringsWaterTreatment Plant 2009 33 0 1.28 0.95 11.78 6.00 0.35 13.00 2.61 8.00 0.53 Baxter SpringsWaterTreatment Plant 2010 33 0 1.07 0.81 11.94 5.00 0.32 13.00 2.09 8.00 0.49 Baxter SpringsWaterTreatment Plant 2011 32 0 1.65 1.17 11.15 6.00 0.37 12.00 3.46 9.00 0.46 Beloit WaterDepartment 2003 23 0 2.88 1.87 15.08 0.00 0.00 10.00 2.75 8.00 2.55 Beloit WaterDepartment 2004 33 0 2.01 1.96 3.63 6.00 1.95 13.00 1.74 8.00 2.46 Beloit WaterDepartment 2005 35 0 2.87 2.32 39.50 7.00 1.49 13.00 4.95 9.00 2.13 Beloit WaterDepartment 2006 34 0 0.69 0.64 2.40 7.00 0.67 13.00 0.69 8.00 0.90 Beloit WaterDepartment 2007 34 0 2.37 2.00 11.93 7.00 1.31 13.00 3.90 9.00 1.66 Beloit WaterDepartment 2008 29 0 3.21 2.40 23.11 5.00 1.63 12.00 4.31 7.00 2.14 Beloit WaterDepartment 2009 34 0 1.67 1.57 7.84 6.00 1.42 13.00 1.86 8.00 1.70 Beloit WaterDepartment 2010 34 0 2.03 1.84 6.17 6.00 1.43 13.00 2.31 9.00 2.34 Beloit WaterDepartment 2011 34 0 2.33 2.05 13.88 6.00 1.14 13.00 3.13 9.00 2.40 Burlington CityWater Works 2003 23 0 2.65 1.66 4.91 0.00 0.00 9.00 2.15 8.00 3.06 Burlington CityWater Works 2004 33 0 1.27 1.13 3.57 6.00 0.88 13.00 1.40 8.00 1.66 Burlington CityWater Works 2005 35 0 1.26 1.04 5.55 7.00 0.53 13.00 1.95 9.00 1.22 Burlington CityWater Works 2006 34 0 0.71 0.69 1.76 7.00 0.12 12.00 0.71 9.00 1.22 Burlington CityWater Works 2007 32 0 1.10 0.99 2.86 6.00 0.67 13.00 1.49 7.00 1.12 
111 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Burlington CityWater Works 2008 30 0 1.50 1.14 5.04 5.00 0.96 13.00 2.14 8.00 1.16 Burlington CityWater Works 2009 33 0 0.93 0.77 2.36 6.00 0.57 13.00 1.06 8.00 1.02 Burlington CityWater Works 2010 32 0 1.62 1.23 5.56 5.00 0.39 13.00 2.66 8.00 1.34 Burlington CityWater Works 2011 32 0 1.52 1.38 2.94 4.00 0.65 13.00 1.34 9.00 2.10 Caney WaterTreatment Plant 2005 25 0 0.50 0.38 1.98 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.59 8.00 0.40 Caney WaterTreatment Plant 2006 34 0 0.56 0.40 8.92 6.00 0.05 13.00 1.24 9.00 0.26 Caney WaterTreatment Plant 2007 35 0 0.39 0.37 0.74 7.00 0.40 13.00 0.42 9.00 0.35 Caney WaterTreatment Plant 2008 28 0 0.40 0.36 0.71 6.00 0.32 12.00 0.42 8.00 0.42 Caney WaterTreatment Plant 2009 32 0 0.49 0.41 3.95 5.00 0.30 13.00 0.69 8.00 0.35 Caney WaterTreatment Plant 2010 22 0 0.49 0.42 1.94 4.00 0.37 12.00 0.59 3.00 0.37 Caney WaterTreatment Plant 2011 34 0 0.55 0.50 1.96 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.76 9.00 0.46 Chanute 2006 24 0 1.10 0.74 2.57 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.00 9.00 1.14 Chanute 2007 31 0 1.43 1.23 6.57 7.00 0.80 11.00 2.36 8.00 1.09 Chanute 2008 27 0 1.65 1.41 5.50 7.00 1.08 10.00 3.16 6.00 1.13 Chanute 2009 33 0 1.12 0.89 5.54 5.00 0.53 13.00 1.52 8.00 1.03 Chanute 2010 32 0 1.91 1.64 7.41 6.00 1.26 12.00 3.29 8.00 1.15 Chanute 2011 34 0 2.30 1.91 13.40 6.00 0.85 13.00 3.94 9.00 1.62 Chetopa 2007 18 0 2.07 1.05 6.15 0.00 0.00 12.00 2.42 4.00 1.18 Chetopa 2008 23 0 1.35 1.09 5.91 7.00 0.95 6.00 2.08 7.00 1.06 Chetopa 2009 28 0 1.16 0.89 3.63 6.00 0.47 11.00 1.68 7.00 1.08 Chetopa 2010 27 0 1.74 1.24 7.96 3.00 0.54 11.00 2.78 8.00 1.17 Chetopa 2011 30 0 1.75 1.58 7.02 4.00 0.75 10.00 2.99 10.00 1.43 
112 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

City OfCarbondale 2003 25 0 2.09 1.39 4.87 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.03 8.00 2.47 City OfCarbondale 2004 27 0 1.43 1.47 3.46 5.00 2.09 12.00 1.42 4.00 1.41 City OfCarbondale 2005 35 0 2.76 2.49 7.81 7.00 0.61 13.00 3.29 9.00 3.94 City OfCarbondale 2006 35 0 1.77 1.70 2.88 7.00 1.48 13.00 1.93 9.00 2.00 City OfCarbondale 2007 33 0 2.72 2.62 4.29 7.00 1.91 12.00 3.07 8.00 2.88 City OfCarbondale 2008 29 0 3.43 2.75 6.22 6.00 3.09 13.00 4.33 7.00 2.60 City OfCarbondale 2009 7 0 2.43 0.70 3.01 6.00 2.10 1.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 City of Emporia 2003 26 0 1.52 1.08 3.58 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.17 8.00 2.53 City of Emporia 2004 33 0 0.90 0.72 2.97 6.00 0.44 13.00 1.21 8.00 0.89 City of Emporia 2005 35 0 0.99 0.82 4.23 7.00 0.58 13.00 1.41 9.00 0.91 City of Emporia 2006 35 0 0.25 0.24 0.69 7.00 0.16 13.00 0.24 9.00 0.32 City of Emporia 2007 35 0 0.90 0.77 4.39 7.00 0.46 13.00 1.37 9.00 0.55 City of Emporia 2008 30 0 0.83 0.72 3.03 6.00 0.66 12.00 0.99 8.00 0.80 City of Emporia 2009 34 0 0.84 0.77 3.07 6.00 0.42 13.00 1.02 8.00 0.94 City of Emporia 2010 34 0 0.98 0.83 3.05 6.00 0.52 13.00 1.12 9.00 1.10 City of Emporia 2011 34 0 0.99 0.92 5.84 6.00 0.66 13.00 1.45 9.00 0.80 City ofOsawatomie 2003 23 0 1.84 1.16 5.64 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.74 8.00 1.58 City ofOsawatomie 2004 33 0 1.71 1.41 4.67 6.00 0.91 13.00 2.36 8.00 1.74 City ofOsawatomie 2005 35 0 1.84 1.50 16.56 7.00 0.71 13.00 3.25 9.00 1.53 City ofOsawatomie 2006 34 0 0.78 0.73 2.93 7.00 0.45 13.00 0.96 8.00 0.72 City ofOsawatomie 2007 34 0 1.47 1.27 5.11 6.00 1.01 13.00 2.31 9.00 0.99 City ofOsawatomie 2008 32 0 1.85 1.46 11.99 6.00 1.21 13.00 2.75 8.00 1.25 
113 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

City ofOsawatomie 2009 34 0 1.24 1.05 3.25 6.00 0.70 13.00 1.91 8.00 1.00 City ofOsawatomie 2010 32 0 1.80 1.37 11.63 5.00 0.40 13.00 3.09 9.00 1.22 City ofOsawatomie 2011 139 0 2.44 1.61 17.55 6.00 0.96 91.00 3.00 36.00 1.37 City of Valley

Falls 2003 23 0 2.52 1.39 9.24 0.00 0.00 9.00 3.39 8.00 1.65 

City of Valley

Falls 2004 33 0 1.67 1.35 5.07 6.00 1.04 13.00 2.58 8.00 1.39 

City of Valley

Falls 2005 35 0 2.27 1.76 8.53 7.00 1.05 13.00 4.33 9.00 1.29 

City of Valley

Falls 2006 35 0 1.12 0.79 5.49 7.00 0.09 13.00 2.23 9.00 0.70 

City of Valley

Falls 2007 35 0 1.79 1.50 4.90 7.00 1.43 13.00 2.72 9.00 1.11 

City of Valley

Falls 2008 32 0 2.15 1.72 5.60 7.00 2.23 12.00 2.99 8.00 1.13 

City of Valley

Falls 2009 7 0 0.80 0.30 1.50 6.00 0.63 1.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 

Coffeyville 2011 25 0 2.34 1.37 15.01 0.00 0.00 10.00 3.65 9.00 0.96 Ellsworth RWD#1 2003 22 0 1.61 1.06 4.74 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.66 8.00 2.18 Ellsworth RWD#1 2004 32 0 1.50 1.50 2.22 5.00 1.56 13.00 1.17 8.00 1.93 Ellsworth RWD#1 2005 34 0 0.97 0.95 1.71 7.00 1.20 13.00 0.89 8.00 1.23 Ellsworth RWD#1 2006 35 0 0.25 0.25 0.92 7.00 0.30 13.00 0.19 9.00 0.36 Ellsworth RWD#1 2007 31 0 1.11 1.11 2.10 7.00 0.63 11.00 1.10 9.00 1.30 Ellsworth RWD#1 2008 31 0 1.56 1.38 5.84 6.00 1.10 12.00 1.54 8.00 1.73 Ellsworth RWD#1 2009 32 0 0.88 0.85 1.15 6.00 0.94 13.00 0.84 7.00 0.92 Ellsworth RWD#1 2010 34 0 1.53 1.46 2.53 6.00 0.68 13.00 1.22 9.00 2.28 Ellsworth RWD#1 2011 34 0 1.37 1.32 1.69 6.00 1.30 13.00 1.29 9.00 1.50 
114 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Erie Not enough data for 2003Erie 2004 33 0 1.41 1.22 3.31 6.00 0.87 13.00 1.94 8.00 1.45 Erie 2005 35 0 1.40 1.13 6.50 7.00 0.55 13.00 2.35 9.00 1.22 Erie 2006 34 0 0.89 0.76 4.48 6.00 0.14 13.00 1.22 9.00 1.01 Erie 2007 33 0 1.59 1.33 6.03 7.00 0.78 13.00 2.67 8.00 1.18 Erie 2008 29 0 1.94 1.43 9.49 5.00 1.07 13.00 3.22 7.00 1.15 Erie 2009 34 0 1.03 0.81 2.58 6.00 0.50 13.00 1.37 8.00 0.88 Erie 2010 33 0 1.67 1.45 11.69 6.00 0.79 12.00 3.33 9.00 1.18 Erie 2011 34 0 1.95 1.64 14.11 6.00 0.83 13.00 3.13 9.00 1.64 Franklin County

RWD #6 Not enough data for 2003

Franklin County

RWD #6 2004 33 0 1.69 1.38 3.95 6.00 0.90 13.00 2.67 8.00 1.31 

Franklin County

RWD #6 2005 35 0 1.65 1.36 6.45 7.00 0.82 13.00 2.50 9.00 1.69 

Franklin County

RWD #6 2006 34 0 0.88 0.80 2.90 7.00 0.44 13.00 1.21 9.00 0.76 

Franklin County

RWD #6 2007 34 0 0.96 0.90 1.62 7.00 0.81 13.00 1.07 8.00 1.03 

Franklin County

RWD #6 2008 31 0 1.32 1.08 3.45 6.00 0.91 13.00 1.29 8.00 1.67 

Franklin County

RWD #6 2009 33 0 0.94 0.83 2.48 6.00 0.61 13.00 1.20 7.00 0.92 

Franklin County

RWD #6 2010 32 0 1.25 1.10 3.13 6.00 0.55 13.00 1.57 7.00 1.34 

Franklin County

RWD #6 2011 32 0 1.60 1.40 8.23 6.00 1.04 11.00 2.01 9.00 1.44 

Harveyville 2006 22 0 0.95 0.66 1.47 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.63 7.00 1.18 Harveyville 2007 14 0 0.72 0.72 1.22 4.00 1.12 2.00 0.84 5.00 0.55 Harveyville 2008 5 0 0.41 0.22 0.53 5.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Herington 2011 25 0 1.24 0.87 1.44 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.00 9.00 1.28 Howard 2010 17 0 1.33 0.68 3.30 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.45 9.00 1.25 
115 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Howard 2011 31 0 0.65 0.63 0.92 5.00 0.72 11.00 0.68 10.00 0.58 Humboldt 2011 16 0 1.58 0.84 2.15 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.27 9.00 1.59 Iola 2009 22 0 1.30 1.31 5.31 1.00 0.33 7.00 3.43 8.00 1.00 Iola 2010 33 0 1.96 1.51 8.98 5.00 0.68 13.00 3.36 9.00 1.29 Iola 2011 137 0 2.17 1.62 10.87 4.00 0.78 91.00 2.49 36.00 1.54 Kansas City BD

of Public

Utilities Not enough data for 2003

Kansas City BD

of Public

Utilities 2004 33 0 0.57 0.46 2.41 6.00 0.25 13.00 0.81 8.00 0.58 

Kansas City BD

of Public

Utilities 2005 33 0 0.79 0.65 3.63 7.00 0.54 13.00 1.12 8.00 0.55 

Kansas City BD

of Public

Utilities 2006 35 0 0.10 0.09 0.43 7.00 0.05 13.00 0.13 9.00 0.13 

Kansas City BD

of Public

Utilities 2007 35 0 0.62 0.55 1.65 7.00 0.38 13.00 0.90 9.00 0.59 

Kansas City BD

of Public

Utilities 2008 32 0 0.73 0.57 2.33 6.00 0.32 13.00 0.89 8.00 0.72 

Kansas City BD

of Public

Utilities 2009 28 0 0.60 0.51 1.36 5.00 0.33 10.00 0.75 8.00 0.58 

Kansas City BD

of Public

Utilities 2010 34 0 0.61 0.53 1.60 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.75 9.00 0.64 

Kansas City BD

of Public

Utilities 2011 33 0 0.47 0.42 0.77 6.00 0.33 13.00 0.52 9.00 0.51 

Kickapoo TribalWaterworks 2009 8 0 0.86 0.34 1.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.30 Kickapoo TribalWaterworks 2010 22 0 2.35 1.30 9.73 2.00 0.40 6.00 2.90 10.00 1.15 Kickapoo Tribal 2011 29 0 1.49 1.28 2.96 3.00 1.01 12.00 1.81 8.00 1.66 
116 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

WaterworksLa Cygne 2006 24 0 1.30 0.79 3.82 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.64 9.00 0.76 La Cygne 2007 35 0 1.42 1.28 3.23 7.00 0.98 13.00 2.19 8.00 1.15 La Cygne 2008 29 0 1.96 1.54 5.35 7.00 1.36 13.00 2.62 7.00 1.53 La Cygne 2009 32 0 1.56 1.29 3.61 4.00 1.01 13.00 2.15 8.00 1.29 La Cygne 2010 34 0 2.01 1.69 4.88 6.00 0.66 13.00 2.80 9.00 1.41 La Cygne 2011 34 0 2.11 1.84 6.15 6.00 1.76 13.00 2.89 9.00 1.63 LeRoy Not enough data for 2007Linn ValleyLakes POA 2003 22 0 1.01 0.73 1.25 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.66 6.00 1.10 Linn ValleyLakes POA 2004 33 0 0.69 0.69 1.34 6.00 0.95 13.00 0.60 8.00 0.72 Linn ValleyLakes POA 2005 33 0 0.50 0.47 1.26 5.00 0.46 13.00 0.53 9.00 0.56 Linn ValleyLakes POA 2006 17 0 0.16 0.16 0.55 7.00 0.14 10.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 Linn ValleyLakes POA 2007 22 0 0.52 0.36 0.69 7.00 0.55 12.00 0.53 3.00 0.22 Linn ValleyLakes POA 2008 10 0 0.43 0.41 0.62 5.00 0.40 3.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 Linn ValleyLakes POA 2009 10 0 0.35 0.29 0.35 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 Linn ValleyLakes POA 2010 35 0 1.23 1.13 2.57 6.00 0.35 13.00 1.31 9.00 1.62 Linn ValleyLakes POA 2011 34 0 0.95 0.92 1.20 6.00 1.00 13.00 0.96 9.00 0.89 Marais DesCygnes PublicUtility Authority 2011 17 0 1.52 0.85 3.11 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.49 9.00 1.34 Miami Co. RWD

#2 2003 21 0 2.29 1.61 3.46 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.37 7.00 2.93 

Miami Co. RWD

#2 2004 32 0 1.73 1.71 2.65 5.00 1.96 13.00 1.47 8.00 2.08 

Miami Co. RWD

#2 2005 35 0 1.91 1.74 5.18 7.00 1.10 13.00 1.62 9.00 2.97 
117 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Miami Co. RWD

#2 2006 32 0 1.42 1.38 2.97 7.00 1.18 12.00 1.05 9.00 2.14 

Miami Co. RWD

#2 2007 34 0 1.39 1.34 2.41 7.00 1.44 12.00 1.48 9.00 1.35 

Miami Co. RWD

#2 2008 31 0 1.28 1.21 2.75 6.00 1.06 13.00 1.16 8.00 1.38 

Miami Co. RWD

#2 2009 27 0 1.70 1.42 2.73 6.00 0.81 6.00 0.96 8.00 2.20 

Miami Co. RWD

#2 2010 34 0 2.09 1.83 7.30 6.00 0.99 13.00 2.71 9.00 2.15 

Miami Co. RWD

#2 2011 34 0 1.88 1.81 2.50 6.00 1.42 13.00 1.67 9.00 2.27 

Milford Not enough data for 2003Milford 2004 33 0 2.37 2.25 3.09 6.00 1.72 13.00 2.26 8.00 2.66 Milford 2005 35 0 2.14 1.98 4.76 7.00 1.79 13.00 2.34 9.00 2.80 Milford 2006 35 0 0.79 0.76 2.29 7.00 0.75 13.00 0.57 9.00 1.09 Milford 2007 35 0 1.59 1.53 2.56 7.00 1.26 13.00 1.78 9.00 1.44 Milford 2008 33 0 1.93 1.81 3.53 7.00 1.74 13.00 1.78 8.00 2.11 Milford 2009 33 0 1.73 1.63 2.35 6.00 1.47 13.00 1.67 8.00 1.83 Milford 2010 35 0 1.82 1.66 8.50 7.00 0.74 13.00 2.26 9.00 2.16 Milford 2011 35 0 1.55 1.40 6.12 7.00 0.78 13.00 1.82 9.00 1.69 Mitchell Co.

RWD #2 2003 23 0 2.73 1.88 3.57 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.80 8.00 3.01 

Mitchell Co.

RWD #2 2004 33 0 2.28 2.16 3.09 6.00 2.22 13.00 2.19 8.00 2.50 

Mitchell Co.

RWD #2 2005 35 0 1.87 1.71 3.60 7.00 1.82 13.00 1.93 9.00 2.22 

Mitchell Co.

RWD #2 2006 32 0 0.92 0.90 2.65 7.00 1.29 11.00 0.73 8.00 1.10 

Mitchell Co.

RWD #2 2007 32 0 1.55 1.48 2.08 6.00 1.14 11.00 1.50 9.00 1.64 

Mitchell Co.

RWD #2 2008 32 0 2.10 1.88 3.75 6.00 1.63 13.00 2.00 8.00 2.29 

Mitchell Co.

RWD #2 2009 35 0 1.63 1.61 2.06 6.00 1.47 13.00 1.49 9.00 1.75 
118 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Mitchell Co.

RWD #2 2010 35 0 1.78 1.70 3.70 6.00 1.48 14.00 1.60 9.00 2.33 

Mitchell Co.

RWD #2 2011 33 0 1.89 1.77 2.76 6.00 1.16 12.00 1.68 9.00 2.38 

Neodesha 2011 26 0 0.65 0.45 3.34 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.86 9.00 0.42 Olathe‐‐ Composite of

Collector Wells 2003 25 0 1.77 1.18 2.85 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.51 8.00 1.67 

Olathe‐‐ Composite of

Collector Wells 2004 32 0 1.18 1.13 1.85 5.00 1.17 13.00 1.18 8.00 1.32 

Olathe‐‐ Composite of

Collector Wells 2005 32 0 0.61 0.57 2.06 6.00 0.08 12.00 0.88 8.00 0.77 

Olathe‐‐ Composite of

Collector Wells 2006 32 0 0.63 0.60 2.51 7.00 0.24 12.00 0.70 8.00 1.02 

Olathe‐‐ Composite of

Collector Wells 2007 33 0 0.94 0.92 1.47 7.00 0.84 11.00 0.93 9.00 1.14 

Olathe‐‐ Composite of

Collector Wells 2008 29 0 1.02 0.98 1.43 6.00 1.10 12.00 0.96 7.00 1.21 

Olathe‐‐ Composite of

Collector Wells 2009 33 0 0.84 0.81 1.37 6.00 0.80 13.00 0.75 8.00 0.96 

Olathe‐‐ Composite of

Collector Wells 2010 34 0 1.36 1.13 7.43 5.00 0.64 13.00 2.14 10.00 1.06 

Olathe‐‐ Composite of

Collector Wells 2011 33 0 0.94 0.91 2.01 6.00 0.77 13.00 0.93 8.00 1.06 

Olathe‐‐ WP1 2003 6 0 3.80 0.69 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 2.31 Olathe‐‐ WP1 2004 8 0 2.98 0.97 4.42 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.63 7.00 2.92 Olathe‐‐ WP1 2005 17 0 3.00 1.06 6.98 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.12 6.00 1.76 Olathe‐‐River 2003 26 0 2.35 1.59 4.57 0.00 0.00 12.00 2.40 8.00 1.90 Olathe‐‐River 2004 33 0 1.39 1.37 4.63 6.00 1.69 13.00 1.43 8.00 1.51 
119 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Olathe‐‐River 2005 30 0 1.49 1.19 3.85 5.00 0.84 12.00 2.07 9.00 1.31 Olathe‐‐River 2006 33 0 0.64 0.58 2.35 7.00 0.28 12.00 0.75 9.00 0.79 Olathe‐‐River 2007 33 0 1.37 1.28 2.79 6.00 0.93 12.00 1.56 9.00 1.62 Olathe‐‐River 2008 32 0 1.66 1.44 4.21 6.00 1.33 13.00 1.78 8.00 1.60 Olathe‐‐River 2009 33 0 1.43 1.27 4.23 6.00 0.99 13.00 1.96 8.00 1.23 Olathe‐‐River 2010 35 0 1.40 1.26 4.02 6.00 0.71 13.00 1.57 10.00 1.71 Olathe‐‐River 2011 32 0 1.31 1.20 4.39 4.00 1.10 13.00 1.56 9.00 1.06 Osage Co RWD#3 2003 26 0 1.43 1.09 5.32 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.94 8.00 1.84 Osage Co RWD#3 2004 33 0 2.02 1.84 2.95 6.00 1.46 13.00 2.29 8.00 2.21 Osage Co RWD#3 2005 35 0 2.18 1.85 17.40 7.00 0.98 13.00 3.02 9.00 2.54 Osage Co RWD#3 2006 33 0 1.49 1.36 3.73 7.00 0.69 12.00 1.71 8.00 1.72 Osage Co RWD#3 2007 34 0 1.82 1.57 4.36 6.00 1.43 13.00 2.33 9.00 1.43 Osage Co RWD#3 2008 29 0 1.82 1.38 4.03 3.00 0.99 13.00 2.20 8.00 1.53 Osage Co RWD#3 2009 34 0 1.79 1.62 5.66 6.00 1.36 13.00 2.40 8.00 1.59 Osage Co RWD#3 2010 33 0 2.51 2.03 8.13 6.00 0.61 12.00 4.00 9.00 1.98 Osage Co RWD#3 2011 34 0 2.02 1.88 3.53 6.00 1.76 13.00 2.11 9.00 2.05 Oswego 2009 20 0 1.25 0.62 4.65 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.74 8.00 1.00 Oswego 2010 33 0 1.92 1.43 9.51 5.00 0.46 13.00 3.65 9.00 1.10 Oswego 2011 34 0 2.35 1.89 15.81 6.00 0.74 13.00 4.37 9.00 1.63 Paola Not enough data for 2003Paola 2004 33 0 0.69 0.68 1.09 6.00 0.81 13.00 0.60 8.00 0.79 Paola 2005 35 0 1.33 1.18 3.33 7.00 0.60 13.00 1.29 9.00 2.12 Paola 2006 35 0 0.54 0.56 0.92 7.00 0.71 13.00 0.49 9.00 0.53 
120 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Paola 2007 33 0 1.05 0.99 1.60 7.00 0.73 13.00 1.22 7.00 1.13 Paola 2008 31 0 0.85 0.76 1.33 6.00 0.82 13.00 0.92 8.00 0.83 Paola 2009 22 0 1.37 0.73 2.40 5.00 0.61 13.00 1.47 4.00 0.67 PublicWholesale WSD#12 2003 26 0 2.38 1.79 5.18 0.00 0.00 12.00 1.73 8.00 3.37 PublicWholesale WSD#12 2004 33 0 1.57 1.53 3.21 6.00 1.62 13.00 1.43 8.00 1.76 PublicWholesale WSD#12 2005 35 0 1.49 1.37 3.75 7.00 1.04 13.00 1.43 9.00 2.15 PublicWholesale WSD#12 2006 34 0 0.86 0.89 1.49 7.00 0.74 13.00 0.71 9.00 1.11 PublicWholesale WSD#12 2007 32 0 1.33 1.22 2.11 7.00 1.25 12.00 1.55 8.00 1.15 PublicWholesale WSD#12 2008 29 0 1.25 1.07 1.92 6.00 1.02 12.00 1.05 8.00 1.67 PublicWholesale WSD#12 2009 34 0 1.00 0.97 1.34 5.00 0.87 13.00 0.96 9.00 1.09 PublicWholesale WSD#12 2010 33 0 1.63 1.43 4.78 5.00 0.63 13.00 1.82 9.00 1.99 PublicWholesale WSD#12 2011 34 0 1.43 1.38 1.89 6.00 1.19 13.00 1.30 9.00 1.62 PublicWholesale WSD#5 Not enough data for 2003PublicWholesale WSD#5 2004 33 0 1.35 1.19 2.76 6.00 0.91 13.00 1.70 8.00 1.29 PublicWholesale WSD#5 2005 34 0 1.35 1.03 5.23 7.00 0.38 13.00 1.95 9.00 1.31 
121 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

PublicWholesale WSD#5 2006 34 0 0.63 0.60 2.04 7.00 0.11 13.00 0.67 8.00 0.98 PublicWholesale WSD#5 2007 33 0 1.02 0.95 2.87 7.00 0.90 12.00 1.34 8.00 0.97 PublicWholesale WSD#5 2008 31 0 1.39 1.06 4.61 6.00 1.06 13.00 2.05 8.00 0.88 PublicWholesale WSD#5 2009 31 0 0.88 0.77 2.02 5.00 0.46 13.00 1.05 6.00 1.20 PublicWholesale WSD#5 2010 33 0 1.54 1.25 5.02 5.00 0.42 13.00 2.42 9.00 1.43 PublicWholesale WSD#5 2011 34 0 1.56 1.36 5.46 6.00 0.72 13.00 1.67 9.00 1.51 Richmond Not enough data for 2003Richmond 2004 32 0 3.13 2.74 7.22 6.00 1.09 13.00 3.75 8.00 3.58 Richmond 2005 32 0 1.96 1.52 7.74 6.00 0.96 12.00 2.74 9.00 1.71 Richmond 2006 33 0 0.72 0.68 2.69 7.00 0.48 13.00 0.72 7.00 0.90 Richmond 2007 28 0 0.61 0.59 1.04 5.00 0.87 12.00 0.65 7.00 0.46 Richmond 2008 23 0 4.08 2.42 20.56 2.00 0.21 12.00 4.33 7.00 4.50 Richmond 2009 31 0 0.49 0.45 0.77 5.00 0.57 12.00 0.48 8.00 0.44 Richmond 2010 33 0 2.31 1.81 6.60 5.00 0.32 13.00 3.65 9.00 2.00 Richmond 2011 30 0 2.82 2.64 5.73 4.00 1.11 12.00 2.94 8.00 3.82 Salina 2007 25 0 1.12 0.79 2.15 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.98 9.00 1.08 Salina 2008 28 0 1.40 1.22 3.12 5.00 0.66 12.00 1.60 6.00 1.57 Salina 2009 34 0 0.96 0.86 6.13 6.00 0.68 13.00 1.25 8.00 0.83 Salina 2010 34 0 1.37 1.25 5.78 6.00 0.45 13.00 1.28 9.00 2.12 Salina 2011 34 0 1.19 1.07 9.30 6.00 0.67 13.00 1.71 9.00 1.13 
122 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Spring Hill 2004 6 0 6.87 0.87 10.49 0.00 0.00 6.00 3.05 0.00 0.00 St. Paul Not enough data for 2003St. Paul 2004 33 0 1.48 1.33 3.91 6.00 1.14 13.00 1.88 8.00 1.57 St. Paul 2005 35 0 1.46 1.16 9.31 7.00 0.44 13.00 2.65 9.00 1.16 St. Paul 2006 35 0 0.90 0.75 5.66 7.00 0.11 13.00 1.41 9.00 0.89 St. Paul 2007 33 0 1.64 1.36 6.23 7.00 0.98 13.00 2.74 8.00 1.04 St. Paul 2008 27 0 1.68 1.25 5.88 5.00 0.95 11.00 2.61 8.00 1.08 St. Paul 2009 32 0 0.71 0.60 2.71 6.00 0.51 12.00 1.13 8.00 0.45 St. Paul 2010 33 0 0.54 0.47 4.64 6.00 0.39 13.00 0.76 8.00 0.38 St. Paul 2011 33 0 1.22 1.02 11.41 6.00 0.60 12.00 1.96 9.00 0.67 Topeka WaterTreatment Plant 2003 26 0 1.79 1.42 5.18 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.61 8.00 1.92 Topeka WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 1.57 1.53 4.04 6.00 1.55 13.00 1.52 8.00 1.72 Topeka WaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 1.55 1.35 6.68 7.00 1.25 13.00 2.23 9.00 1.51 Topeka WaterTreatment Plant 2006 35 0 0.93 0.75 5.48 7.00 0.40 13.00 0.93 9.00 1.18 Topeka WaterTreatment Plant 2007 35 0 1.40 1.31 2.67 7.00 1.07 13.00 1.47 9.00 1.70 Topeka WaterTreatment Plant 2008 29 0 1.75 1.36 5.58 6.00 0.92 13.00 2.01 7.00 1.78 Topeka WaterTreatment Plant 2009 23 0 1.30 1.08 2.37 6.00 1.05 6.00 1.31 8.00 1.34 LeitchfieldWater Works 2003 27 0 2.06 1.42 4.08 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.04 8.00 2.85 LeitchfieldWater Works 2004 33 0 2.37 2.01 5.46 6.00 0.29 13.00 3.08 8.00 3.66 LeitchfieldWater Works 2005 35 0 1.87 1.61 5.48 7.00 0.60 13.00 2.32 9.00 2.90 LeitchfieldWater Works 2006 34 0 0.82 0.83 9.27 7.00 0.05 12.00 0.77 9.00 0.96 LeitchfieldWater Works 2007 28 0 1.10 0.98 2.79 7.00 0.39 8.00 1.29 7.00 1.83 
123 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

LeitchfieldWater Works 2008 29 0 1.41 1.12 4.55 6.00 0.34 11.00 1.65 8.00 1.74 LeitchfieldWater Works 2009 33 0 1.16 0.99 2.95 6.00 0.35 12.00 1.55 8.00 1.64 LeitchfieldWater Works 2010 34 0 2.40 1.98 6.93 5.00 0.32 13.00 3.56 9.00 2.69 LeitchfieldWater Works 2011 34 0 1.16 1.03 3.23 6.00 0.36 13.00 1.28 9.00 1.69 Livermore 2006 23 0 0.87 0.50 3.40 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.01 9.00 0.61 Livermore 2007 32 0 0.95 1.02 6.24 4.00 0.30 9.00 2.37 7.00 0.79 Livermore 2008 30 0 1.38 1.10 6.98 6.00 0.33 13.00 2.27 6.00 0.67 Livermore 2009 28 0 1.32 1.01 14.39 5.00 0.33 9.00 2.31 4.00 0.85 Livermore 2010 30 0 2.11 1.74 8.52 5.00 0.45 12.00 3.42 5.00 1.44 Livermore 2011 36 0 1.26 1.12 8.43 7.00 0.63 10.00 1.60 7.00 1.29 Livermore 1899 1 0 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Livermore 2006 23 0 0.84 0.48 3.40 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.98 9.00 0.58 Livermore(Green River) Not enough data for 2007Livermore(Green River) Not enough data for 2008Marion WaterTreatment Plant 2003 27 0 0.87 0.64 1.42 0.00 0.00 13.00 0.98 8.00 0.83 Marion WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 2.20 2.01 4.04 6.00 0.42 13.00 2.43 8.00 3.29 Marion WaterTreatmentPlant‐‐LakeGeorge 2005 35 0 0.63 0.61 1.33 7.00 0.69 13.00 0.50 9.00 0.72 Marion WaterTreatmentPlant‐‐LakeGeorge 2006 35 0 0.10 0.10 0.33 7.00 0.10 13.00 0.09 9.00 0.14 Marion WaterTreatmentPlant‐‐LakeGeorge 2007 35 0 0.36 0.35 0.45 7.00 0.38 13.00 0.35 9.00 0.35 
124 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Marion WaterTreatmentPlant‐‐LakeGeorge 2008 28 0 0.35 0.33 0.35 3.00 0.32 13.00 0.35 7.00 0.35 Marion WaterTreatmentPlant‐‐LakeGeorge 2009 6 0 0.35 0.20 0.35 6.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Marion WaterTreatmentPlant‐‐Old Lake 2005 21 0 0.91 0.52 2.46 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.70 9.00 0.80 Marion WaterTreatmentPlant‐‐Old Lake 2006 35 0 0.07 0.07 0.25 7.00 0.05 13.00 0.09 9.00 0.06 Marion WaterTreatmentPlant‐‐Old Lake 2007 35 0 0.80 0.73 1.90 7.00 0.38 13.00 0.90 9.00 1.05 Marion WaterTreatmentPlant‐‐Old Lake 2008 29 0 0.40 0.36 0.70 4.00 0.32 13.00 0.45 7.00 0.37 Marion WaterTreatmentPlant‐‐Old Lake 2009 6 0 0.35 0.20 0.35 6.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Webster Co

Water District 2003 27 0 1.61 1.04 3.93 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.28 8.00 1.12 

Webster Co

Water District 2004 33 0 1.49 1.14 5.79 6.00 0.27 13.00 2.54 8.00 1.25 

Webster Co

Water District 2005 36 0 1.43 1.15 4.29 8.00 0.60 13.00 2.16 9.00 1.31 

Webster Co

Water District 2006 35 0 0.87 0.75 3.68 7.00 0.16 13.00 1.49 9.00 0.80 

Webster Co

Water District 2007 35 0 1.45 1.16 5.69 7.00 0.38 13.00 2.53 9.00 0.96 

Webster Co

Water District 2008 31 0 1.52 1.10 5.64 5.00 0.30 13.00 2.52 8.00 0.91 

Webster Co

Water District 2009 32 0 1.33 0.94 11.24 6.00 0.33 12.00 2.30 7.00 0.71 

Webster Co

Water District 2010 32 0 1.38 1.13 8.68 5.00 0.49 12.00 2.58 9.00 0.66 

Webster Co 2011 33 0 1.12 0.95 5.41 6.00 0.39 12.00 1.65 9.00 0.95 
125 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Water DistrictE. Jefferson

Water WorksDist. #1 2003 29 0 0.94 0.66 2.95 0.00 0.00 7.00 1.07 14.00 1.07 

E. Jefferson

Water WorksDist. #1 2004 46 0 0.98 0.92 3.62 9.00 0.45 13.00 1.60 13.00 1.29 

E. Jefferson

Water WorksDist. #1 2005 37 0 0.90 0.77 3.29 8.00 0.43 13.00 1.04 8.00 1.24 

E. Jefferson

Water WorksDist. #1 2006 46 0 0.34 0.32 2.41 9.00 0.06 13.00 0.62 13.00 0.45 

E. Jefferson

Water WorksDist. #1 2007 44 0 0.78 0.73 1.79 8.00 0.55 13.00 0.96 13.00 0.92 

E. Jefferson

Water WorksDist. #1 2008 44 0 0.71 0.67 2.17 10.00 0.63 13.00 0.87 12.00 0.77 

E. Jefferson

Water WorksDist. #1 2009 46 0 0.64 0.61 1.05 9.00 0.56 13.00 0.81 13.00 0.65 

E. Jefferson

Water WorksDist. #1 2010 45 0 0.79 0.73 3.07 8.00 0.45 13.00 1.23 13.00 0.78 

E. Jefferson

Water WorksDist. #1 2011 45 0 0.66 0.62 1.17 8.00 0.49 13.00 0.80 13.00 0.76 

Iberville Water

District #3 2004 46 0 2.04 1.87 12.68 9.00 2.05 13.00 2.30 13.00 1.85 

Iberville Water

District #3 2005 43 0 2.39 2.21 14.16 9.00 4.08 13.00 2.65 10.00 1.35 

Iberville Water

District #3 2006 46 0 0.79 0.87 8.85 9.00 1.71 13.00 0.86 13.00 0.74 

Iberville Water

District #3 2007 46 0 1.28 1.19 5.71 9.00 0.61 13.00 2.35 13.00 1.12 

Iberville Water

District #3 2008 41 0 1.08 0.95 5.34 9.00 0.64 13.00 1.80 11.00 0.88 

Iberville Water

District #3 2009 44 0 0.82 0.76 4.31 9.00 0.87 13.00 1.04 11.00 0.73 
126 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Iberville Water

District #3 2010 43 0 0.85 0.79 4.03 8.00 0.40 11.00 1.28 13.00 1.00 

Iberville Water

District #3 2011 45 0 0.80 0.76 1.86 8.00 0.67 13.00 1.02 13.00 0.91 

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #37 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #38 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #39 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #40 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #41 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #42 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #43 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #44 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #45 Not enough data for 2007
127 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #46 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #47 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #48 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #49 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #50 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #51 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #52 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #53 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #54 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #55 Not enough data for 2007
128 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #56 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #57 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #58 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #59 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #60 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #61 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #62 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #63 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #64 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #65 Not enough data for 2007
129 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #66 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #67 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #68 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #69 Not enough data for 2007

Iberville Water

District #3,Baton RoughDistrict #70 Not enough data for 2007

LaFourcheWater Dist. #1 2003 34 0 1.27 0.88 3.58 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.60 12.00 0.99 LaFourcheWater Dist. #1 2004 44 0 1.25 1.13 3.31 8.00 0.51 13.00 1.57 12.00 1.50 LaFourcheWater Dist. #1 2005 43 0 1.41 1.26 6.86 9.00 1.26 13.00 2.02 10.00 1.22 LaFourcheWater Dist. #1 2006 46 0 0.50 0.47 3.23 9.00 0.18 13.00 0.92 13.00 0.65 LaFourcheWater Dist. #1 2007 45 0 0.96 0.89 4.86 9.00 0.63 13.00 1.07 13.00 1.36 LaFourcheWater Dist. #1 2008 43 0 0.97 0.88 4.90 10.00 0.57 13.00 1.38 11.00 1.10 LaFourcheWater Dist. #1 2009 40 0 1.49 1.26 26.20 9.00 2.57 13.00 1.38 8.00 0.73 LaFourcheWater Dist. #1 2010 44 0 1.17 1.10 5.52 7.00 0.72 13.00 1.28 13.00 1.20 LaFourcheWater Dist. #1 2011 44 0 1.07 0.95 9.41 8.00 0.65 13.00 1.71 12.00 1.06 ThibodauxWater Works 2008 43 0 1.14 1.03 10.49 10.00 0.68 13.00 1.98 11.00 1.00 
130 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

ThibodauxWater Works 2009 10 0 0.94 0.33 3.16 9.00 0.67 1.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 ThibodeauxWater Works 2003 36 0 1.29 0.95 4.87 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.24 12.00 0.97 ThibodeauxWater Works 2004 46 0 1.09 1.01 2.99 9.00 0.55 13.00 1.81 13.00 1.20 ThibodeauxWater Works 2005 42 0 1.70 1.35 36.13 9.00 0.58 13.00 3.38 9.00 1.04 ThibodeauxWater Works 2006 46 0 0.49 0.45 5.06 9.00 0.13 13.00 1.02 13.00 0.54 ThibodeauxWater Works 2007 46 0 0.76 0.72 1.79 9.00 0.56 13.00 0.91 13.00 0.96 BrazosportWater Authority 2003 24 0 0.92 0.65 1.95 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.08 5.00 0.82 BrazosportWater Authority 2004 34 0 1.17 1.00 3.02 8.00 1.45 13.00 1.38 7.00 0.76 BrazosportWater Authority Not enough data for 2005BrazosportWater Authority 2006 34 0 0.25 0.21 1.01 9.00 0.20 13.00 0.40 7.00 0.18 BrazosportWater Authority 2007 28 0 1.09 0.91 5.35 9.00 0.76 11.00 1.11 5.00 0.56 BrazosportWater Authority 2008 24 0 1.36 0.83 7.46 7.00 0.85 12.00 1.77 3.00 0.47 BrazosportWater Authority 2009 32 0 1.20 0.95 7.79 9.00 0.58 10.00 2.12 6.00 0.52 BrazosportWater Authority 2010 32 0 0.66 0.57 1.34 7.00 0.47 12.00 0.89 9.00 0.53 BrazosportWater Authority 2011 35 0 0.71 0.65 4.48 9.00 1.20 13.00 0.57 7.00 0.42 Bucklin Water

Department 2003 23 0 1.50 1.03 2.35 0.00 0.00 12.00 1.46 7.00 1.63 

Bucklin Water

Department 2004 33 0 1.62 1.56 4.03 6.00 0.72 13.00 1.30 8.00 2.91 

Bucklin Water

Department 2005 31 0 0.72 0.67 1.03 6.00 0.72 12.00 0.69 8.00 0.89 

Bucklin Water

Department 2006 32 0 0.19 0.19 0.57 7.00 0.19 11.00 0.17 8.00 0.23 

Bucklin Water

Department 2007 30 0 1.00 0.95 2.07 6.00 0.44 11.00 1.16 7.00 1.34 
131 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Bucklin Water

Department 2008 25 0 0.87 0.69 2.42 4.00 0.49 9.00 0.58 7.00 1.25 

Bucklin Water

Department 2009 7 0 0.43 0.23 0.48 6.00 0.41 1.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 

Cameron Light& Power 2003 23 0 3.29 2.15 4.76 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.67 9.00 4.04 Cameron Light& Power 2004 33 0 1.84 1.82 2.94 6.00 2.21 13.00 1.41 8.00 2.32 Cameron Light& Power 2005 35 0 1.23 1.16 2.78 7.00 0.92 13.00 1.02 9.00 2.00 Cameron Light& Power 2006 35 0 0.78 0.78 2.07 7.00 0.48 13.00 0.63 9.00 1.08 Cameron Light& Power 2007 36 0 1.07 1.15 2.05 7.00 1.16 13.00 0.91 10.00 1.09 Cameron Light& Power 2008 28 0 1.68 1.50 2.65 5.00 1.82 11.00 1.97 7.00 1.52 Cameron Light& Power 2009 34 0 1.51 1.29 5.97 6.00 0.50 13.00 1.84 8.00 2.20 Cameron Light& Power 2010 34 0 1.29 1.10 5.13 6.00 0.38 13.00 1.74 9.00 1.34 Cameron Light& Power 2011 35 0 2.65 2.15 8.74 6.00 0.74 14.00 3.61 9.00 2.45 ClarenceCannon WWC 2003 26 0 1.38 1.16 3.19 0.00 0.00 13.00 0.91 7.00 2.28 ClarenceCannon WWC 2004 33 0 1.44 1.30 5.18 6.00 0.75 13.00 1.64 8.00 1.94 ClarenceCannon WWC 2005 35 0 1.86 1.70 4.23 7.00 0.56 13.00 1.84 9.00 2.75 ClarenceCannon WWC 2006 30 0 1.90 1.44 9.22 7.00 1.23 13.00 1.92 9.00 2.16 ConcordiaWaterTreatment Plant 2003 25 0 2.51 1.91 5.68 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.16 7.00 3.27 ConcordiaWaterTreatment Plant 2004 31 0 2.76 2.45 5.87 6.00 1.19 12.00 2.78 7.00 3.62 ConcordiaWaterTreatment Plant 2005 32 0 1.76 1.56 4.62 7.00 1.44 11.00 1.51 9.00 2.39 
132 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

ConcordiaWaterTreatment Plant 2006 28 0 1.31 1.19 2.66 6.00 0.66 11.00 1.30 7.00 1.86 ConcordiaWaterTreatment Plant 2007 24 0 2.66 2.28 4.84 4.00 1.46 10.00 3.02 6.00 2.67 ConcordiaWaterTreatment Plant 2008 20 0 2.35 1.60 8.91 3.00 1.23 10.00 1.82 5.00 2.69 ConcordiaWaterTreatment Plant 2009 26 0 2.65 2.42 6.78 6.00 1.39 9.00 3.64 6.00 2.98 ConcordiaWaterTreatment Plant 2010 30 0 2.62 1.97 8.97 3.00 0.64 12.00 3.92 9.00 2.32 ConcordiaWaterTreatment Plant 2011 33 0 2.56 2.20 6.40 6.00 0.99 12.00 3.00 9.00 2.85 Creighton Not enough data for 2003Creighton 2004 32 0 1.24 0.94 4.50 6.00 0.54 12.00 1.33 8.00 1.56 Creighton 2005 35 0 0.42 0.43 0.65 7.00 0.55 13.00 0.32 9.00 0.46 Creighton 2006 5 0 0.05 0.14 0.05 5.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Dearborn WaterTreatment Plant 2003 15 0 2.18 0.70 7.04 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.30 2.00 1.12 Drexel 2006 23 0 1.89 1.23 4.01 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.76 8.00 1.77 Drexel 2007 32 0 1.33 1.11 2.70 6.00 1.28 13.00 2.17 8.00 0.58 Drexel 2008 33 0 0.40 0.39 0.76 7.00 0.43 13.00 0.38 8.00 0.38 Drexel 2009 34 0 1.92 1.92 4.61 6.00 0.33 13.00 0.99 8.00 3.94 Drexel 2010 31 0 6.74 4.66 32.56 5.00 1.26 11.00 12.59 9.00 2.83 Drexel 2011 4 0 1.93 0.46 2.15 4.00 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Drexel 1899 1 0 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Drexel 2010 31 0 6.74 4.66 32.56 5.00 1.26 11.00 12.59 9.00 2.83 Drexel 2011 4 0 1.93 0.46 2.15 4.00 1.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 
133 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Hannibal Water

Treatment 2003 21 0 1.24 0.73 3.23 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.29 7.00 1.03 

Hannibal Water

Treatment 2004 32 0 1.34 1.03 4.30 6.00 0.38 12.00 2.03 8.00 1.32 

Hannibal Water

Treatment 2005 34 0 1.43 1.15 9.30 7.00 0.42 13.00 2.60 7.00 1.13 

Hannibal Water

Treatment 2008 31 0 1.34 0.99 8.71 6.00 0.40 13.00 2.08 7.00 1.05 

Hannibal Water

Treatment Plant 2006 35 0 0.23 0.20 1.28 7.00 0.05 13.00 0.36 9.00 0.21 

Hannibal Water

Treatment Plant 2007 33 0 1.20 0.98 5.68 7.00 0.41 12.00 2.13 9.00 0.90 

Hannibal Water

Treatment Plant 2009 5 0 0.45 0.22 0.52 5.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Harrison CountyPWSD #1 2006 22 0 1.88 1.35 2.94 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.27 9.00 2.14 Harrison CountyPWSD #1 2007 31 0 1.79 1.66 2.32 7.00 1.91 12.00 1.71 8.00 1.73 Harrison CountyPWSD #1 2008 27 0 1.08 0.80 1.61 1.00 0.29 13.00 1.13 8.00 1.10 Harrison CountyPWSD #1 2009 34 0 0.85 0.83 1.07 6.00 0.82 13.00 0.86 8.00 0.81 Harrison CountyPWSD #1 Not enough data for 2010JamesportWaterTreatment Plant 2003 27 0 2.05 1.48 2.78 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.01 8.00 2.37 JamesportWaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 0.86 0.82 2.18 6.00 0.88 13.00 0.73 8.00 1.16 JamesportWaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 1.39 1.26 4.72 7.00 0.42 13.00 0.88 9.00 2.80 JamesportWaterTreatment Plant 2006 35 0 0.71 0.68 1.34 7.00 0.50 13.00 0.74 9.00 0.87 JamesportWaterTreatment Plant 2007 35 0 1.47 1.43 3.20 7.00 0.78 13.00 1.35 9.00 2.24 
134 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

JamesportWaterTreatment Plant 2008 32 0 0.76 0.66 2.65 6.00 0.85 13.00 0.98 8.00 0.50 JamesportWaterTreatment Plant 2009 7 0 0.35 0.21 0.35 6.00 0.33 1.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 King City 2010 19 0 0.69 0.44 0.93 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.29 10.00 0.70 King City 2011 34 0 0.62 0.59 0.71 6.00 0.56 13.00 0.61 9.00 0.61 LaPlata WaterTreatment Plant 2004 27 0 3.61 2.71 4.93 0.00 0.00 13.00 3.36 8.00 4.19 LaPlata WaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 1.96 1.84 3.26 7.00 2.67 13.00 1.84 9.00 1.84 LaPlata WaterTreatment Plant 2006 11 0 0.82 0.42 1.40 6.00 1.02 5.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 MarcelineWaterTreatment Plant 2003 26 0 2.39 1.72 3.79 0.00 0.00 12.00 1.94 8.00 2.87 MarcelineWaterTreatment Plant 2004 32 0 1.35 1.32 2.18 7.00 1.40 13.00 1.30 6.00 1.43 MarcelineWaterTreatment Plant 2005 33 0 0.64 0.61 0.98 6.00 0.79 13.00 0.60 9.00 0.64 MarcelineWaterTreatment Plant 2006 31 0 0.24 0.24 0.45 7.00 0.18 12.00 0.21 8.00 0.32 MarcelineWaterTreatment Plant 2007 30 0 1.26 1.19 2.39 6.00 0.69 13.00 1.14 7.00 1.83 MarcelineWaterTreatment Plant 2008 31 0 1.15 1.00 2.27 6.00 0.87 13.00 1.01 8.00 1.48 MarcelineWaterTreatment Plant 2009 30 0 0.62 0.60 0.89 6.00 0.66 11.00 0.62 7.00 0.60 MarcelineWaterTreatment Plant 2010 31 0 2.51 1.93 6.12 4.00 0.32 12.00 3.38 10.00 2.29 
135 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

MarcelineWaterTreatment Plant 2011 31 0 1.95 1.83 5.28 6.00 1.50 11.00 1.29 8.00 3.29 Maryville Water

Treatment Plant 2003 23 0 3.73 2.68 5.22 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.37 6.00 4.55 

Maryville Water

Treatment Plant 2004 33 0 3.21 3.10 4.34 6.00 3.39 13.00 3.12 8.00 3.22 

Maryville Water

Treatment Plant 2005 35 0 3.03 2.87 5.26 7.00 2.42 13.00 2.87 9.00 3.61 

Maryville Water

Treatment Plant 2006 35 0 3.15 3.00 5.52 7.00 2.35 13.00 3.27 9.00 3.85 

Maryville Water

Treatment Plant 2007 35 0 3.36 3.06 6.63 7.00 2.75 13.00 4.30 9.00 3.04 

Maryville Water

Treatment Plant 2008 28 0 2.15 1.90 3.42 5.00 1.86 12.00 1.76 8.00 2.71 

Maryville Water

Treatment Plant 2009 33 0 1.68 1.51 4.19 5.00 1.44 13.00 2.08 8.00 1.39 

Maryville Water

Treatment Plant 2010 33 0 1.91 1.72 4.61 5.00 0.92 13.00 1.95 9.00 2.32 

Maryville Water

Treatment Plant 2011 34 0 2.02 1.92 2.77 6.00 1.48 13.00 1.88 9.00 2.48 

Maysville 2006 23 0 1.09 0.73 1.87 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.98 7.00 1.09 Maysville 2007 20 0 0.65 0.65 1.13 3.00 0.90 7.00 0.73 4.00 0.52 Maysville 2008 34 0 0.39 0.37 0.56 7.00 0.41 13.00 0.36 9.00 0.40 Maysville 2009 34 0 0.38 0.36 0.47 6.00 0.33 13.00 0.39 8.00 0.39 Maysville 2010 33 0 2.23 1.88 8.04 5.00 0.33 13.00 2.29 9.00 3.38 Maysville 2011 34 0 0.78 0.76 1.50 6.00 1.19 13.00 0.82 9.00 0.59 Middle ForkWater Company 2003 6 0 2.06 0.42 3.43 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.59 3.00 0.76 Middle ForkWater Company 2004 28 0 0.78 0.64 2.34 2.00 0.69 12.00 1.02 8.00 0.55 Middle ForkWater Company 2005 35 0 1.75 1.59 4.91 7.00 0.37 13.00 1.34 9.00 3.15 
136 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Middle ForkWater Company 2006 35 0 1.37 1.33 2.20 7.00 1.24 13.00 1.34 9.00 1.65 Middle ForkWater Company 2007 35 0 0.69 0.70 1.71 7.00 1.21 13.00 0.63 9.00 0.55 Middle ForkWater Company 2008 30 0 0.39 0.38 0.52 5.00 0.38 13.00 0.36 7.00 0.44 Middle ForkWater Company 2009 30 0 0.45 0.42 0.59 5.00 0.30 11.00 0.39 8.00 0.53 Middle ForkWater Company 2010 34 0 0.45 0.42 0.76 6.00 0.36 12.00 0.52 9.00 0.44 Middle ForkWater Company 2011 34 0 0.45 0.43 1.12 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.47 9.00 0.48 Monroe City‐‐Route J Lake 2003 19 0 5.38 2.99 8.57 0.00 0.00 5.00 1.62 8.00 6.39 Monroe City‐‐Route J Lake 2004 33 0 1.83 1.77 3.37 6.00 2.30 13.00 1.79 8.00 2.06 Monroe City‐‐Route J Lake 2005 34 0 0.54 0.53 0.86 7.00 0.46 12.00 0.52 9.00 0.65 Monroe City‐‐Route J Lake 2006 32 0 1.32 1.33 6.00 6.00 0.19 13.00 1.06 8.00 2.27 Monroe City‐‐Route J Lake 2007 35 0 1.51 1.53 2.67 7.00 1.15 13.00 1.02 9.00 2.24 Monroe City‐‐Route J Lake 2008 31 0 2.31 1.73 8.11 6.00 1.30 13.00 2.85 8.00 2.23 Monroe City‐‐Route J Lake 2009 7 0 0.85 0.33 1.02 6.00 0.80 1.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 Monroe City‐‐S.Lake 2003 23 0 3.61 2.68 7.67 0.00 0.00 10.00 3.10 7.00 4.32 Monroe City‐‐S.Lake 2004 32 0 2.40 2.30 3.49 6.00 2.75 12.00 2.53 8.00 2.32 Monroe City‐‐S.Lake 2005 34 0 0.73 0.69 1.29 7.00 0.82 12.00 0.76 9.00 0.73 Monroe City‐‐S.Lake 2006 8 0 0.57 0.37 2.04 6.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.74 Monroe City‐‐S.Lake 2008 10 0 2.12 1.49 7.72 3.00 1.20 3.00 1.63 2.00 2.43 Shelbina 2003 27 0 1.55 1.12 9.07 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.49 8.00 1.88 Shelbina 2004 33 0 1.45 1.31 4.25 6.00 0.64 13.00 1.17 8.00 2.84 
137 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Shelbina 2005 34 0 0.83 0.81 2.82 7.00 0.47 13.00 0.55 8.00 1.58 Shelbina 2006 35 0 1.91 1.69 8.06 7.00 0.35 13.00 1.93 9.00 3.27 Shelbina 2007 34 0 0.81 0.77 4.69 7.00 1.02 13.00 0.57 9.00 0.93 Shelbina 2008 32 0 0.61 0.51 2.56 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.64 8.00 0.72 Shelbina 2009 7 0 0.35 0.21 0.35 6.00 0.33 1.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 Shelbina 1899 1 0 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Shelbina 2006 35 0 1.91 1.69 8.06 7.00 0.35 13.00 1.93 9.00 3.27 Shelbina 2007 34 0 0.81 0.77 4.69 7.00 1.02 13.00 0.57 9.00 0.93 Shelbina ‐ Salt

River, Shelbina 2003 25 0 2.53 1.41 11.52 0.00 0.00 11.00 3.36 8.00 1.64 

Shelbina SaltRiver 2004 33 0 1.77 1.28 11.59 6.00 0.36 13.00 3.48 8.00 1.00 Shelbina SaltRiver 2005 34 0 2.42 1.89 20.19 7.00 0.63 13.00 5.47 8.00 1.12 Shelbina SaltRiver 2006 35 0 1.30 0.94 14.07 7.00 0.05 13.00 3.11 9.00 0.35 Shelbina SaltRiver 2007 34 0 1.69 1.27 11.00 7.00 0.43 13.00 3.41 9.00 0.91 Shelbina SaltRiver 2008 32 0 2.36 1.58 16.36 6.00 0.60 13.00 4.27 8.00 1.14 Shelbina SaltRiver 2009 7 0 0.35 0.21 0.35 6.00 0.33 1.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 Smithville WaterTreatment Plant 2003 27 0 3.04 2.24 4.08 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.63 8.00 3.39 Smithville WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 2.66 2.61 3.75 6.00 2.59 13.00 2.47 8.00 3.10 Smithville WaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 2.29 2.15 4.62 7.00 1.95 13.00 1.99 9.00 3.25 Smithville WaterTreatment Plant 2006 35 0 1.47 1.45 2.35 7.00 1.40 13.00 1.26 9.00 1.69 Smithville WaterTreatment Plant 2007 35 0 2.29 2.22 3.36 7.00 1.86 13.00 2.42 9.00 2.44 
138 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Smithville WaterTreatment Plant 2008 31 0 1.72 1.57 2.82 6.00 2.10 13.00 1.47 8.00 1.74 Smithville WaterTreatment Plant 2009 34 0 1.40 1.36 2.06 6.00 1.09 13.00 1.26 8.00 1.64 Smithville WaterTreatment Plant 2010 34 0 1.85 1.74 3.35 6.00 1.11 13.00 1.67 9.00 2.48 Smithville WaterTreatment Plant 2011 34 0 1.76 1.72 2.30 6.00 1.41 13.00 1.46 9.00 2.14 UnionvilleWaterTreatment Plant 2003 27 0 1.87 1.36 2.42 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.75 8.00 1.96 UnionvilleWaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 2.02 1.93 3.56 6.00 1.51 13.00 1.76 8.00 2.55 UnionvilleWaterTreatment Plant 2005 34 0 1.79 1.67 4.23 6.00 1.40 13.00 1.55 9.00 2.67 UnionvilleWaterTreatment Plant 2006 27 0 1.27 1.10 2.05 7.00 1.44 11.00 1.15 8.00 1.22 Vandalia WaterTreatment Plant 2003 23 0 5.11 3.27 15.59 0.00 0.00 9.00 3.07 8.00 6.18 Vandalia WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 3.52 3.37 11.07 6.00 0.96 13.00 2.82 8.00 6.74 Vandalia WaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 1.29 1.27 2.40 7.00 0.95 13.00 1.17 9.00 1.91 Vandalia WaterTreatment Plant 2006 35 0 0.93 0.92 2.38 7.00 0.89 13.00 0.78 9.00 1.34 Vandalia WaterTreatment Plant 2007 32 0 1.16 1.13 1.98 6.00 0.89 12.00 1.15 8.00 1.55 Vandalia WaterTreatment Plant 2008 31 0 2.33 1.68 12.33 6.00 1.14 12.00 3.43 8.00 1.76 Vandalia WaterTreatment Plant 2009 7 0 2.61 0.79 3.40 6.00 2.55 1.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 WyacondaWater 2003 23 0 3.07 2.28 4.47 0.00 0.00 9.00 3.18 8.00 3.39 
139 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

DepartmentWyacondaWaterDepartment 2005 44 0 13.11 11.36 26.62 6.00 0.34 13.00 14.69 13.00 19.26 WyacondaWaterDepartment 2008 44 0 1.42 1.24 4.08 9.00 0.72 13.00 1.55 14.00 2.13 WyacondaWaterDepartment 2009 7 0 0.59 0.23 0.72 7.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WyacondaWaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 1.03 0.99 3.37 6.00 1.54 13.00 1.10 8.00 0.84 WyacondaWaterTreatment Plant 2006 52 0 4.33 4.30 10.42 13.00 6.99 13.00 4.38 13.00 3.70 WyacondaWaterTreatment Plant 2007 48 0 1.48 1.45 3.54 13.00 2.05 13.00 1.19 9.00 1.42 Johnston CountyUtilitiesDepartment 2006 13 0 0.06 0.10 0.12 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.13 6.00 0.05 Johnston CountyUtilitiesDepartment 2007 33 0 0.52 0.47 0.95 11.00 0.69 11.00 0.48 5.00 0.36 Johnston CountyUtilitiesDepartment 2008 33 0 0.59 0.52 1.30 12.00 0.81 11.00 0.53 6.00 0.40 Johnston CountyUtilitiesDepartment 2009 35 0 0.45 0.42 0.77 11.00 0.48 11.00 0.48 6.00 0.35 Johnston CountyUtilitiesDepartment 2010 39 0 0.42 0.41 0.72 8.00 0.43 11.00 0.41 8.00 0.37 Johnston CountyUtilitiesDepartment 2011 34 0 0.61 0.56 5.09 10.00 0.44 11.00 0.79 7.00 0.41 Monroe (John

Glenn WTP ‐ NC) Not enough data for 2007
140 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Monroe‐‐JohnGlenn 2004 33 0 0.85 0.79 2.49 6.00 0.76 13.00 0.81 8.00 1.18 Monroe‐‐JohnGlenn 2005 33 0 1.89 1.51 4.16 5.00 0.52 13.00 2.46 9.00 1.95 Monroe‐‐JohnGlenn 2006 35 0 0.61 0.65 3.73 7.00 1.07 13.00 0.51 9.00 0.36 Monroe‐‐JohnGlenn 2007 33 0 1.80 1.67 2.91 7.00 0.96 12.00 2.12 8.00 2.07 Monroe‐‐JohnGlenn 2008 28 0 2.51 2.13 5.02 6.00 1.65 12.00 2.88 6.00 2.90 Monroe‐‐JohnGlenn 2009 33 0 1.61 1.55 2.29 6.00 1.13 12.00 1.52 8.00 1.79 Monroe‐‐JohnGlenn 2010 31 0 0.68 0.60 1.17 3.00 0.42 12.00 0.73 10.00 0.75 Monroe‐‐JohnGlenn 2011 35 0 1.50 1.36 2.80 6.00 0.45 13.00 1.60 10.00 2.00 South Granville 2008 22 0 0.50 0.35 0.65 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.41 8.00 0.49 South Granville 2009 34 0 0.43 0.43 0.57 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.39 8.00 0.54 South Granville 2010 34 0 0.38 0.36 0.43 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.38 9.00 0.37 South Granville 2011 34 0 0.39 0.37 0.68 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.39 9.00 0.39 Alliance Water

Treatment Plant 2003 26 0 2.96 2.20 8.10 0.00 0.00 12.00 1.78 8.00 4.77 

Alliance Water

Treatment Plant 2004 33 0 2.52 2.33 7.48 6.00 0.55 13.00 2.14 8.00 4.60 

Alliance Water

Treatment Plant 2005 32 0 0.85 0.75 2.30 4.00 0.31 13.00 0.51 9.00 1.45 

Alliance Water

Treatment Plant 2006 32 0 1.86 2.04 13.58 7.00 0.32 12.00 0.67 7.00 3.62 

Alliance Water

Treatment Plant 2007 35 0 0.84 0.84 1.84 7.00 0.38 13.00 0.51 9.00 1.53 

Alliance Water

Treatment Plant 2008 29 0 0.53 0.49 0.85 6.00 0.34 10.00 0.36 8.00 0.71 

Alliance Water

Treatment Plant 2009 7 0 0.46 0.24 0.57 6.00 0.45 1.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 

Blanchester Not enough data for 2003
141 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Blanchester 2004 33 0 2.09 1.90 8.45 6.00 0.49 13.00 1.95 8.00 3.60 Blanchester 2005 34 0 4.83 3.80 33.29 6.00 0.75 13.00 9.22 9.00 3.44 Blanchester 2006 35 0 1.93 1.91 10.97 7.00 0.53 13.00 2.05 9.00 3.96 Blanchester 2007 35 0 1.06 1.10 3.71 7.00 0.45 13.00 0.59 9.00 1.60 Blanchester 2008 32 0 4.40 3.93 11.65 6.00 6.59 13.00 5.21 8.00 2.47 Blanchester 2009 34 0 4.87 4.42 11.15 6.00 6.19 13.00 6.68 8.00 3.58 Blanchester 2010 34 0 6.04 4.69 32.52 6.00 0.81 13.00 11.20 9.00 5.15 Blanchester 2011 34 0 1.08 1.04 2.96 6.00 0.67 13.00 0.59 9.00 2.16 Bowling GreenWaterTreatment 2003 23 0 2.15 1.36 4.87 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.95 7.00 2.74 Bowling GreenWaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 1.99 1.68 6.07 6.00 0.41 13.00 2.42 8.00 2.98 Bowling GreenWaterTreatment Plant 2005 31 0 1.98 1.42 4.79 7.00 0.48 13.00 2.60 9.00 2.19 Bowling GreenWaterTreatment Plant 2006 35 0 2.23 1.66 15.96 7.00 0.14 13.00 4.95 9.00 1.38 Bowling GreenWaterTreatment Plant 2007 35 0 2.54 2.01 11.80 7.00 0.41 13.00 4.18 9.00 2.80 Bowling GreenWaterTreatment Plant 2008 30 0 3.27 2.24 33.55 5.00 0.43 13.00 5.81 8.00 2.15 Bowling GreenWaterTreatment Plant 2009 7 0 0.50 0.24 0.59 6.00 0.48 1.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 Cinnamon LakeUtility Co. 2003 20 0 2.35 1.49 3.45 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.84 8.00 2.75 Cinnamon LakeUtility Co. 2004 33 0 2.22 2.41 4.74 6.00 1.49 13.00 0.94 8.00 4.00 Cinnamon LakeUtility Co. 2006 35 0 1.67 1.72 4.27 7.00 0.77 13.00 0.83 9.00 3.18 
142 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Cinnamon LakeUtility Co. 2007 34 0 1.10 1.14 3.53 6.00 1.77 13.00 0.94 9.00 1.06 Cinnamon LakeUtility Co. 2008 32 0 0.71 0.71 1.25 6.00 0.55 13.00 0.41 8.00 1.03 Cinnamon LakeUtility Co. Not enough data for 2009City of Defiance 2003 27 0 2.35 1.38 15.06 0.00 0.00 13.00 3.80 8.00 1.12 City of Defiance 2004 33 0 2.62 1.89 19.27 6.00 0.35 13.00 5.08 8.00 1.57 City of Defiance 2006 34 0 2.04 1.42 19.07 7.00 0.27 13.00 4.48 9.00 0.80 City of Defiance 2007 34 0 1.71 1.30 7.83 7.00 0.45 13.00 3.12 9.00 1.11 City of Defiance 2008 29 0 3.40 2.06 13.94 4.00 0.31 13.00 6.26 8.00 1.36 City of Defiance 2009 34 0 2.38 1.73 19.10 6.00 0.46 13.00 4.75 8.00 1.23 City of Defiance 2010 34 0 2.56 1.86 14.93 6.00 0.40 13.00 5.41 9.00 1.12 City of Defiance 2011 34 0 1.76 1.38 7.83 6.00 0.44 13.00 3.10 9.00 1.39 City of Lima 2003 27 0 0.92 0.71 3.17 0.00 0.00 13.00 0.70 8.00 1.22 City of Lima 2004 33 0 1.08 1.04 1.98 6.00 0.71 13.00 0.92 8.00 1.31 City of Lima 2006 34 0 0.61 0.61 1.33 7.00 0.48 13.00 0.53 9.00 0.89 City of Lima 2007 33 0 1.09 1.06 1.53 7.00 0.82 13.00 1.13 7.00 1.33 City of Lima 2008 33 0 1.32 1.25 3.22 7.00 0.85 13.00 1.00 8.00 1.83 City of Lima 2009 7 0 1.23 0.43 1.64 6.00 1.20 1.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 City of Shelby‐‐ 

Reservoir 3 2003 21 0 0.66 0.44 1.93 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.49 7.00 0.60 

City of Shelby‐‐ 

Reservoir 3 2004 33 0 0.50 0.49 0.83 6.00 0.53 13.00 0.49 8.00 0.51 

City of Shelby‐‐ 

Reservoir 3 2006 31 0 0.67 0.70 1.71 7.00 0.40 11.00 0.38 8.00 1.26 

City of Shelby‐‐ 

Reservoir 3 2007 35 0 1.30 1.25 3.73 7.00 1.20 13.00 1.26 9.00 1.42 

City of Shelby‐‐ 

Reservoir 3 2008 32 0 1.36 1.26 2.37 6.00 1.04 13.00 1.03 8.00 1.80 

City of Shelby‐‐ 

Reservoir 3 2009 33 0 0.90 0.87 1.86 6.00 0.84 12.00 0.82 8.00 0.97 
143 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

City of Shelby‐‐ 

Reservoir 3 2010 34 0 1.01 0.99 3.32 6.00 0.70 13.00 0.87 9.00 1.17 

City of Shelby‐‐ 

Reservoir 3 2011 34 0 0.77 0.74 0.98 6.00 0.61 13.00 0.74 9.00 0.85 

City of Shelby‐‐

Reservoir 2 2003 21 0 1.32 0.88 2.73 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.76 7.00 1.57 

City of Shelby‐‐

Reservoir 2 2004 33 0 2.00 1.88 4.40 6.00 0.62 13.00 1.61 8.00 3.46 

City of Shelby‐‐

Reservoir 2 2006 31 0 2.04 2.02 10.72 7.00 0.48 11.00 3.01 8.00 3.20 

City of Shelby‐‐

Reservoir 2 2007 35 0 2.08 2.07 3.72 7.00 1.18 13.00 1.77 9.00 3.14 

City of Shelby‐‐

Reservoir 2 2008 32 0 1.46 1.33 2.13 6.00 1.24 13.00 1.42 8.00 1.58 

City of Shelby‐‐

Reservoir 2 2009 33 0 1.20 1.17 2.17 6.00 1.02 12.00 1.10 8.00 1.31 

City of Shelby‐‐

Reservoir 2 2010 34 0 1.17 1.14 2.58 6.00 0.68 13.00 0.96 9.00 1.70 

City of Shelby‐‐

Reservoir 2 2011 34 0 0.94 0.89 7.13 6.00 0.92 13.00 1.13 9.00 0.68 

Clermont Co.Water Not enough data for 2003Clermont Co.Water 2004 33 0 3.30 3.07 13.24 6.00 1.54 13.00 3.35 8.00 4.42 Clermont Co.Water 2006 35 0 2.39 2.53 7.05 7.00 4.88 13.00 1.61 9.00 2.18 Clermont Co.Water 2007 32 0 1.11 1.15 4.03 6.00 1.57 12.00 0.74 8.00 1.13 Clermont Co.Water 2008 30 0 2.75 2.19 11.44 6.00 1.68 12.00 3.45 8.00 2.11 Clermont Co.Water 2009 32 0 2.31 2.04 5.41 5.00 1.43 12.00 2.62 8.00 2.56 Clermont Co.Water 2010 31 0 4.92 3.80 26.12 3.00 1.90 13.00 7.42 9.00 3.63 Clermont Co.Water 2011 28 0 1.97 1.71 4.06 6.00 1.35 7.00 1.71 9.00 2.07 Delaware WaterPlant 2003 27 0 2.72 1.64 12.89 0.00 0.00 13.00 4.28 8.00 1.70 Delaware WaterPlant 2004 32 0 2.42 2.02 11.72 6.00 0.29 13.00 3.09 8.00 3.31 
144 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Delaware WaterPlant 2006 34 0 2.24 1.54 15.64 7.00 0.05 13.00 4.48 9.00 1.33 Delaware WaterPlant 2007 35 0 2.84 2.18 12.92 7.00 0.42 13.00 5.28 9.00 2.15 Delaware WaterPlant 2008 32 0 4.10 2.93 37.44 6.00 0.40 13.00 7.74 8.00 2.29 Delaware WaterPlant 2009 34 0 2.41 1.95 7.98 6.00 0.54 13.00 3.61 8.00 2.66 Delaware WaterPlant 2010 34 0 1.77 1.52 9.94 6.00 0.49 13.00 2.94 9.00 1.59 Delaware WaterPlant 2011 34 0 1.85 1.52 11.43 6.00 0.54 13.00 2.87 9.00 1.95 Lake of the

Woods Water

Company Not enough data for 2003

Lake of the

Woods Water

Company 2004 31 0 2.02 1.88 6.53 6.00 0.45 12.00 2.73 7.00 2.59 

Lake of the

Woods Water

Company 2006 34 0 2.57 2.34 14.78 7.00 1.71 13.00 2.74 9.00 4.00 

Lake of the

Woods Water

Company 2007 33 0 0.78 0.76 1.54 6.00 0.66 12.00 0.53 9.00 0.91 

Lake of the

Woods Water

Company 2008 24 0 2.48 1.63 8.32 5.00 0.98 11.00 3.47 8.00 1.83 

McClure Water

Treatment Plant 2003 11 0 2.55 1.87 15.57 0.00 0.00 5.00 5.43 4.00 1.51 

McClure Water

Treatment Plant 2004 25 0 3.04 2.17 20.87 3.00 0.29 11.00 6.65 8.00 1.47 

McClure Water

Treatment Plant 2006 29 0 2.60 2.07 24.76 7.00 0.07 12.00 7.21 8.00 0.89 

McClure Water

Treatment Plant 2007 28 0 3.13 1.85 10.51 5.00 0.40 8.00 4.01 9.00 2.47 

McClure Water

Treatment Plant 2008 29 0 4.46 2.72 50.57 5.00 0.34 12.00 8.25 8.00 1.88 
145 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

McClure Water

Treatment Plant 2009 32 0 2.71 1.92 15.27 4.00 0.36 13.00 4.95 8.00 1.82 

McClure Water

Treatment Plant 2010 33 0 3.03 2.15 20.54 6.00 0.40 13.00 6.04 9.00 1.56 

McClure Water

Treatment Plant 2011 30 0 2.12 1.47 9.99 3.00 0.27 13.00 2.57 9.00 2.45 

Monroeville Not enough data for 2003Monroeville 2004 33 0 2.17 1.64 18.74 6.00 0.34 13.00 3.51 8.00 1.93 Monroeville 2006 35 0 1.43 1.11 11.38 7.00 0.36 13.00 2.94 9.00 0.87 Monroeville 2007 33 0 1.99 1.62 17.77 7.00 0.44 13.00 3.82 7.00 1.71 Monroeville 2008 28 0 0.83 0.66 1.64 2.00 0.27 13.00 0.72 8.00 0.97 Monroeville 2009 32 0 0.73 0.71 0.92 6.00 0.64 13.00 0.66 7.00 0.84 Monroeville 2010 28 0 0.93 0.77 4.54 5.00 0.65 13.00 1.04 7.00 0.80 Monroeville 2011 27 0 0.76 0.64 1.48 2.00 0.28 12.00 0.69 7.00 0.88 Monroeville‐ West BranchHuron 2008 32 0 3.01 2.03 42.72 6.00 0.37 13.00 5.91 8.00 1.30 Monroeville‐ West BranchHuron 2009 32 0 1.72 1.33 10.42 6.00 0.48 13.00 2.75 7.00 1.39 Monroeville‐ West BranchHuron 2010 25 0 2.13 1.19 10.66 5.00 0.38 13.00 3.17 7.00 1.02 Monroeville‐ West BranchHuron Not enough data for 2011Mt. Orab 2003 26 0 1.08 0.80 3.21 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.87 8.00 1.08 Mt. Orab 2004 29 0 0.64 0.64 1.11 6.00 0.84 11.00 0.57 8.00 0.58 Mt. Orab 2006 37 0 2.75 2.72 8.56 8.00 5.70 14.00 2.08 9.00 2.23 Mt. Orab 2007 35 0 0.83 0.81 1.78 7.00 0.94 13.00 0.76 9.00 0.78 Mt. Orab 2008 31 0 2.22 1.89 2.88 6.00 2.12 13.00 2.39 8.00 2.02 
146 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Mt. Orab 2009 15 0 1.06 0.50 1.75 6.00 0.84 9.00 0.85 0.00 0.00 Mt. Orab 1899 1 0 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mt. Orab 2007 35 0 0.83 0.81 1.78 7.00 0.94 13.00 0.76 9.00 0.78 Mt. Orab ‐ Creek 2003 9 0 1.79 0.48 2.94 0.00 0.00 6.00 1.07 3.00 0.51 Mt. Orab‐ Sterling RunCreek 2004 6 0 3.62 1.82 10.27 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.27 2.00 3.87 Mt. Orab‐ Sterling RunCreek 2006 24 0 18.84 9.91 270.23 5.00 3.81 9.00 34.97 5.00 1.12 Mt. Orab‐ Sterling RunCreek 2007 33 0 2.23 1.56 15.40 1.00 0.17 15.00 1.16 10.00 2.54 Mt. Orab‐ Sterling RunCreek 2008 26 0 6.41 3.72 86.67 2.00 1.67 12.00 11.45 8.00 1.53 Mt. Orab‐ Sterling RunCreek 2009 15 0 3.60 1.05 31.87 6.00 0.73 9.00 3.19 0.00 0.00 Napoleon Not enough data for 2003Napoleon 2004 33 0 2.62 1.87 20.28 6.00 0.34 13.00 5.17 8.00 1.39 Napoleon 2006 35 0 2.47 1.77 19.18 7.00 0.23 13.00 5.66 9.00 0.89 Napoleon 2007 35 0 2.58 1.96 10.51 7.00 0.38 13.00 4.77 9.00 2.15 Napoleon 2008 32 0 3.69 2.52 37.24 6.00 0.53 13.00 7.56 8.00 1.52 Napoleon 2009 34 0 2.34 1.73 14.93 6.00 0.39 13.00 4.47 8.00 1.50 Napoleon 2010 34 0 3.12 2.26 18.60 6.00 0.42 13.00 6.45 9.00 1.58 Napoleon 2011 34 0 1.94 1.52 9.80 6.00 0.45 13.00 2.68 9.00 2.27 NewWashingtonWater Plant 2003 26 0 1.39 1.02 3.31 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.22 9.00 2.11 NewWashingtonWater Plant 2004 33 0 1.07 1.23 4.05 6.00 1.12 13.00 0.54 8.00 1.32 
147 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

NewWashingtonWater Plant 2006 32 0 0.60 0.68 4.38 7.00 0.35 13.00 0.28 8.00 1.58 NewWashingtonWater Plant 2007 29 0 1.16 1.14 3.10 4.00 0.45 12.00 1.03 9.00 1.69 NewWashingtonWater Plant 2008 28 0 0.71 0.67 1.06 5.00 0.68 13.00 0.70 5.00 0.87 NewWashingtonWater Plant 2009 4 0 0.46 0.22 0.48 4.00 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Newark WaterWorks 2004 30 0 1.30 0.88 6.75 3.00 0.21 13.00 2.29 8.00 0.65 Newark WaterWorks 2006 35 0 0.79 0.66 8.04 7.00 0.35 13.00 1.50 9.00 0.42 Newark WaterWorks 2007 34 0 0.97 0.81 7.54 7.00 0.79 13.00 1.48 9.00 0.51 Newark WaterWorks 2008 32 0 2.18 1.53 20.75 7.00 0.42 12.00 4.70 8.00 0.65 Newark WaterWorks 2009 33 0 0.75 0.63 5.09 5.00 0.44 13.00 1.04 8.00 0.45 Newark WaterWorks 2010 34 0 0.81 0.70 4.42 6.00 0.59 13.00 1.34 9.00 0.43 Newark WaterWorks 2011 140 0 1.65 0.97 27.25 6.00 0.78 91.00 2.21 37.00 0.49 Newark WaterWorks, Newark Not enough data for 2007Norwalk Water

Treatment Plant 2003 25 0 2.64 2.20 5.76 0.00 0.00 12.00 1.03 7.00 3.45 

Norwalk Water

Treatment Plant 2004 32 0 3.31 3.14 5.20 6.00 3.61 13.00 2.94 7.00 3.29 

Norwalk Water

Treatment Plant 2006 35 0 2.43 2.21 10.08 7.00 0.51 13.00 2.14 9.00 4.20 

Norwalk Water

Treatment Plant 2007 34 0 1.52 1.60 3.59 7.00 0.66 13.00 1.07 8.00 1.83 

Norwalk Water

Treatment Plant 2008 31 0 1.43 1.38 2.96 6.00 1.58 13.00 0.90 8.00 1.69 
148 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Norwalk Water

Treatment Plant 2009 7 0 1.62 0.53 1.95 6.00 1.56 1.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 

Piqua Gravel Pit 2004 33 0 0.53 0.44 6.34 6.00 0.25 13.00 0.86 8.00 0.34 Piqua Gravel Pit 2006 34 0 0.12 0.10 0.49 7.00 0.05 12.00 0.12 9.00 0.15 Piqua Gravel Pit 2007 35 0 1.89 1.73 7.06 7.00 0.42 13.00 1.56 9.00 3.62 Piqua Gravel Pit 2008 33 0 0.81 0.73 1.83 7.00 1.08 13.00 0.78 8.00 0.75 Piqua Gravel Pit 2009 34 0 0.44 0.44 1.02 6.00 0.52 13.00 0.41 8.00 0.38 Piqua Gravel Pit 2010 34 0 0.53 0.50 0.88 6.00 0.58 13.00 0.56 9.00 0.41 Piqua Gravel Pit 2011 34 0 0.67 0.59 3.36 6.00 0.49 13.00 0.89 9.00 0.60 Piqua MiamiRiver 2004 33 0 1.88 1.43 14.12 6.00 0.38 13.00 3.48 8.00 1.28 Piqua MiamiRiver 2006 34 0 1.75 1.25 16.91 7.00 0.08 12.00 3.75 9.00 0.83 Piqua MiamiRiver 2007 35 0 1.33 1.05 11.49 7.00 0.47 13.00 2.66 9.00 0.63 Piqua MiamiRiver 2008 33 0 3.48 2.36 36.22 7.00 0.41 13.00 7.40 8.00 1.25 Piqua MiamiRiver 2009 34 0 0.76 0.67 2.56 6.00 0.50 13.00 1.09 8.00 0.63 Piqua MiamiRiver 2010 34 0 1.32 1.03 11.48 6.00 0.61 13.00 2.53 9.00 0.63 Piqua MiamiRiver 2011 34 0 1.06 0.87 11.13 6.00 0.44 13.00 1.88 9.00 0.66 Piqua Reservoir 2003 21 0 6.79 3.04 37.79 0.00 0.00 8.00 9.49 7.00 1.74 Piqua Reservoir 2004 33 0 3.33 2.69 12.92 6.00 0.47 13.00 4.92 8.00 3.81 Piqua Reservoir 1899 1 0 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Piqua Reservoir 2004 33 0 3.33 2.69 12.92 6.00 0.47 13.00 4.92 8.00 3.81 Piqua Reservoir‐ Gravel Pit, Piqua 2003 21 0 0.32 0.22 0.68 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.36 7.00 0.21 Piqua Reservoir‐ Miami River,Piqua 2003 21 0 2.60 1.31 12.56 0.00 0.00 8.00 3.07 7.00 1.45 Piqua‐‐Swift 2006 34 0 3.24 2.80 15.84 7.00 1.49 12.00 3.59 9.00 2.99 
149 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

LakePiqua‐‐SwiftLake 2007 35 0 4.66 3.82 14.38 7.00 2.87 13.00 7.41 9.00 2.69 Piqua‐‐SwiftLake 2008 33 0 7.73 5.61 33.49 7.00 2.74 13.00 13.20 8.00 5.04 Piqua‐‐SwiftLake 2009 34 0 1.84 1.56 7.75 6.00 1.78 13.00 2.05 8.00 1.39 Piqua‐‐SwiftLake 2010 34 0 5.52 4.43 30.26 6.00 3.63 13.00 9.94 9.00 2.67 Piqua‐‐SwiftLake 2011 34 0 8.01 6.18 44.08 6.00 3.19 13.00 10.52 9.00 9.80 Upper Sandusky

City Hall 2003 20 0 1.93 1.32 4.20 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.31 6.00 2.63 

Upper Sandusky

City Hall 2004 31 0 1.20 1.18 3.25 5.00 1.15 13.00 0.91 8.00 1.57 

Upper Sandusky

City Hall 2006 28 0 0.51 0.53 1.12 6.00 0.72 10.00 0.50 6.00 0.61 

Upper Sandusky

City Hall 2007 31 0 1.15 1.07 1.85 4.00 0.57 12.00 0.84 9.00 1.60 

Upper Sandusky

City Hall 2008 28 0 1.11 0.99 1.68 6.00 0.85 12.00 0.99 8.00 1.43 

Upper Sandusky

City Hall 2009 4 0 0.87 0.25 0.97 4.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Village ofOttawa 2003 27 0 1.52 1.13 2.64 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.22 8.00 1.93 Village ofOttawa 2004 33 0 1.77 1.68 4.08 6.00 0.73 13.00 1.51 8.00 2.58 Village ofOttawa 2006 34 0 0.77 0.76 2.26 7.00 0.40 13.00 0.66 8.00 1.51 Village ofOttawa 2007 35 0 0.78 0.77 1.26 7.00 0.74 13.00 0.73 9.00 0.94 Village ofOttawa 2008 30 0 0.98 0.94 2.30 6.00 0.49 13.00 0.73 6.00 1.70 Village ofOttawa 2009 32 0 1.44 1.40 3.66 6.00 0.54 12.00 1.14 7.00 2.56 Village ofOttawa 2010 29 0 1.59 1.30 3.41 5.00 0.59 13.00 1.68 7.00 2.04 Village ofOttawa 2011 32 0 1.49 1.37 3.96 4.00 0.52 13.00 0.98 9.00 2.71 
150 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

WaynokaRegional Water 2003 13 0 0.90 0.37 4.55 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.55 7.00 0.62 WaynokaRegional Water 2004 21 0 3.07 2.60 11.23 3.00 0.25 7.00 0.30 5.00 6.11 WaynokaRegional Water 2006 35 0 0.58 0.59 1.12 7.00 0.68 13.00 0.47 9.00 0.66 WaynokaRegional Water 2007 35 0 0.71 0.69 0.93 7.00 0.83 13.00 0.72 9.00 0.66 WaynokaRegional Water 2008 32 0 1.40 1.27 2.85 7.00 0.73 13.00 1.12 8.00 1.94 WaynokaRegional Water 2009 33 0 1.43 1.45 2.15 6.00 1.65 12.00 1.17 8.00 1.65 WaynokaRegional Water 2010 34 0 0.98 0.94 1.43 6.00 1.20 13.00 1.03 9.00 0.90 WaynokaRegional Water 2011 34 0 1.00 1.08 2.68 6.00 0.82 13.00 0.57 9.00 0.81 Wilmington Not enough data for 2003Wilmington 2004 33 0 1.94 1.89 3.85 6.00 0.87 13.00 1.54 8.00 2.77 Wilmington 2006 34 0 1.32 1.31 3.52 7.00 0.67 13.00 1.25 7.00 2.05 Wilmington 2007 33 0 0.87 0.89 1.90 7.00 1.15 13.00 0.75 9.00 0.88 Wilmington 2008 33 0 1.98 1.73 5.86 7.00 0.74 13.00 2.15 8.00 2.38 Wilmington 2009 33 0 1.72 1.61 2.40 6.00 1.55 12.00 1.81 9.00 1.70 Wilmington 2010 32 0 1.34 1.29 2.02 6.00 1.28 11.00 1.03 9.00 1.69 Wilmington 2011 33 0 1.14 1.09 2.39 6.00 0.94 12.00 0.93 9.00 1.60 Polk Center 2008 21 0 3.74 1.70 45.11 0.00 0.00 8.00 5.94 5.00 0.48 Polk Center 2009 35 0 0.37 0.37 0.73 6.00 0.33 12.00 0.41 6.00 0.39 Polk Center 2010 38 0 1.41 1.12 20.87 6.00 0.35 13.00 3.40 6.00 0.39 Polk Center 2011 40 0 0.43 0.40 2.53 7.00 0.33 13.00 0.54 7.00 0.37 Aquilla WaterSupply District 2003 25 0 3.22 2.33 4.35 0.00 0.00 12.00 2.94 7.00 3.15 Aquilla WaterSupply District 2004 33 0 1.66 1.48 3.66 9.00 1.33 13.00 1.98 6.00 1.80 Aquilla Water 2006 26 0 1.33 1.00 4.60 9.00 1.30 10.00 1.73 6.00 0.78 
151 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Supply DistrictCameron 2006 15 0 0.16 0.16 0.32 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.16 6.00 0.21 Cameron 2007 33 0 0.99 0.87 4.59 8.00 1.89 13.00 0.82 6.00 0.43 Cameron 2008 27 0 0.68 0.60 4.52 6.00 0.44 11.00 1.24 5.00 0.41 Cameron 2009 30 0 0.87 0.69 3.66 9.00 0.65 10.00 1.23 6.00 0.46 Cameron 2010 29 0 1.20 0.87 18.44 6.00 0.45 11.00 2.09 7.00 0.57 Cameron 2011 35 0 0.54 0.50 2.04 8.00 0.43 14.00 0.71 7.00 0.42 Cameron 1899 1 0 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cameron 2009 30 0 0.87 0.69 3.66 9.00 0.65 10.00 1.23 6.00 0.46 City of Ennis 2003 23 0 1.50 1.04 3.16 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.26 6.00 1.24 City of Ennis 2004 34 0 1.66 1.55 3.26 9.00 1.32 13.00 2.15 6.00 1.62 City of Ennis 2006 34 0 0.53 0.46 3.19 9.00 0.36 13.00 0.78 6.00 0.44 City of Ennis 2007 34 0 1.23 1.07 4.29 9.00 0.87 13.00 1.89 6.00 0.81 City of Ennis 2008 33 0 1.63 1.48 4.24 10.00 0.75 13.00 2.25 5.00 1.78 City of Ennis 2009 10 0 1.84 0.55 2.34 9.00 1.57 1.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 City of Taylor 2003 25 0 0.36 0.30 0.69 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.35 7.00 0.40 City of Taylor 2004 33 0 0.84 0.62 4.07 9.00 0.41 13.00 1.67 6.00 0.20 City of Taylor 2006 32 0 0.13 0.11 0.40 9.00 0.05 12.00 0.22 6.00 0.05 City of Taylor 2007 33 0 0.63 0.61 2.47 8.00 1.31 13.00 0.45 6.00 0.35 City of Taylor 2008 30 0 0.45 0.41 1.00 8.00 0.38 12.00 0.52 6.00 0.40 City of Taylor 2009 32 0 0.49 0.47 0.96 7.00 0.49 13.00 0.59 6.00 0.44 City of Taylor 2010 35 0 0.57 0.54 1.22 8.00 0.37 13.00 0.64 7.00 0.77 City of Taylor 2011 33 0 0.43 0.41 0.49 8.00 0.36 12.00 0.45 7.00 0.44 Cooper WaterTreatment Plant 2003 14 0 0.32 0.25 0.46 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.20 5.00 0.33 Cooper WaterTreatment Plant 2004 31 0 0.25 0.25 0.39 8.00 0.32 12.00 0.22 5.00 0.26 
152 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Cooper WaterTreatment Plant 2006 31 0 0.48 0.44 1.58 9.00 0.84 12.00 0.40 4.00 0.36 Cooper WaterTreatment Plant 2007 26 0 1.87 1.53 3.21 7.00 1.87 10.00 2.70 6.00 1.13 Cooper WaterTreatment Plant 2008 27 0 1.95 1.42 3.79 6.00 1.04 12.00 2.38 6.00 1.64 Cooper WaterTreatment Plant 2009 31 0 1.15 1.09 3.18 8.00 0.89 10.00 1.72 6.00 1.24 Cooper WaterTreatment Plant 2010 31 0 2.00 1.63 6.11 6.00 0.46 12.00 2.91 8.00 1.90 Cooper WaterTreatment Plant 2011 31 0 0.64 0.60 1.00 7.00 0.68 12.00 0.67 7.00 0.53 Corsicanna 2003 25 0 1.08 0.83 1.40 0.00 0.00 13.00 0.99 6.00 1.18 Corsicanna 2004 34 0 2.78 2.65 6.03 9.00 2.86 13.00 2.43 6.00 3.38 Corsicanna 2006 30 0 1.33 1.02 8.96 10.00 1.49 13.00 1.08 6.00 1.19 Crosby 2008 19 0 1.35 0.84 2.16 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.19 6.00 1.52 Crosby 2009 35 0 1.37 1.15 5.28 9.00 1.29 13.00 1.74 6.00 0.89 Crosby 2010 33 0 1.53 1.37 4.04 8.00 0.61 13.00 2.26 7.00 1.73 Crosby 2011 27 0 1.25 1.03 1.73 8.00 0.88 12.00 1.39 6.00 1.40 Crosby 1899 1 0 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crosby 2009 35 0 1.37 1.15 5.28 9.00 1.29 13.00 1.74 6.00 0.89 Crosby‐‐Gulf

Aquifer 2008 6 0 1.62 0.92 2.27 0.00 0.00 5.00 1.22 0.00 0.00 

Crosby‐‐Gulf

Aquifer Not enough data for 2010

Crosby‐‐Gulf

Aquifer 2011 9 0 0.96 0.88 1.61 2.00 0.35 1.00 0.63 1.00 1.59 

Marlin Water

Treatment Plant 2003 17 0 1.74 1.04 3.73 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.52 5.00 1.84 

Marlin Water

Treatment Plant 2004 35 0 0.42 0.37 0.91 9.00 0.63 13.00 0.47 7.00 0.21 

Marlin Water

Treatment Plant 2006 29 0 0.22 0.20 0.70 9.00 0.44 13.00 0.17 6.00 0.05 

MidlothianWater 2003 24 0 1.45 1.12 1.88 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.23 6.00 1.65 
153 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

Treatment PlantMidlothianWaterTreatment Plant 2004 34 0 2.10 1.94 4.05 9.00 2.33 13.00 2.42 6.00 1.71 MidlothianWaterTreatment Plant 2006 34 0 0.93 0.88 2.93 9.00 1.20 13.00 0.88 6.00 0.88 MidlothianWaterTreatment Plant 2007 35 0 1.62 1.49 2.65 9.00 1.20 13.00 2.15 7.00 1.44 MidlothianWaterTreatment Plant 2008 33 0 1.78 1.54 3.08 9.00 1.26 13.00 2.17 6.00 1.62 MidlothianWaterTreatment Plant 2009 10 0 1.80 0.54 2.56 9.00 1.53 1.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 Waterwood 2010 12 0 0.70 0.38 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.48 Waterwood 2011 34 0 0.80 0.69 4.61 8.00 0.67 13.00 1.14 7.00 0.59 Waterwood 1899 1 0 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Waterwood 2010 12 0 0.70 0.38 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.48 WaxahachieWaterTreatment Plant 2003 20 0 1.53 1.04 2.51 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.07 6.00 1.86 WaxahachieWaterTreatment Plant 2004 34 0 1.23 1.11 2.30 9.00 1.39 13.00 1.53 6.00 1.00 WaxahachieWaterTreatment Plant 2006 34 0 0.66 0.60 1.68 9.00 0.33 13.00 0.91 6.00 0.68 WaxahachieWaterTreatment Plant 2007 29 0 1.10 0.88 1.91 9.00 0.72 12.00 1.62 5.00 0.78 WaxahachieWaterTreatment Plant 2008 25 0 1.67 1.23 2.30 4.00 0.40 13.00 1.80 4.00 1.67 
154 

Table 3: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentrations in Raw Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (DetecSite ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

ArithAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1st QtrSamples

90‐d avg1st QtrSamples

# 2ndQtrSamples

90‐d avg2nd QtrSamples

# 3rd QtrSamples

90‐d avg3rd QtrSamples

WaxahachieWaterTreatment Plant 2009 24 0 1.50 1.15 2.22 9.00 1.37 7.00 1.63 7.00 1.37 WaxahachieWaterTreatment Plant 2010 23 0 0.64 0.62 1.81 6.00 0.44 8.00 0.65 5.00 0.89 WaxahachieWaterTreatment Plant 2011 22 0 0.70 0.65 0.80 1.00 0.57 7.00 0.63 7.00 0.71 
155 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Stockton East Water District

Not enoughdata for 2006

Stockton East Water District 2007 24 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.53 3.00 0.35 5.00 0.35 6.00 0Stockton East Water District‐‐New Melones

Reservoir 2007 4 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0

Sumner Hills

Not enoughdata for 2006

Sumner Hills 2007 28 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.35 3.00 0.35 5.00 0.35 7.00 0Belle Glade

Not enoughdata for 2006

Belle Glade 2007 37 0.00 0.67 0.62 1.64 8.00 0.51 10.00 0.66 8.00 0Lee County Utilities 2007 17 0.00 0.40 0.39 0.76 8.00 0.43 8.00 0.35 0.00 0Peace River Regional Water

Not enoughdata for 2006

Peace River Regional Water 2007 37 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.45 8.00 0.40 10.00 0.35 8.00 0Punta Gorda

Not enoughdata for 2006

Punta Gorda 2007 36 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.60 8.00 0.40 10.00 0.36 8.00 0Centerville Municipal Water Works 2003 23 0.00 2.11 2.22 4.48 0.00 0.00 10.00 2.73 7.00 1Centerville Municipal Water Works 2004 31 0.00 0.39 0.43 1.51 6.00 0.87 11.00 0.26 8.00 0Centerville Municipal Water Works 2005 34 0.00 0.35 0.37 0.53 7.00 0.36 12.00 0.28 9.00 0Centerville Municipal Water Works 2006 19 0.00 0.42 0.25 2.26 10.00 0.70 7.00 0.11 2.00 0Chariton Municipal Water Works 2003 23 0.00 0.92 1.22 2.35 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.78 7.00 0Chariton Municipal Water Works 2004 31 0.00 1.55 1.64 2.36 6.00 1.57 11.00 1.03 8.00 1Chariton Municipal Water Works 2005 34 0.00 0.82 0.92 2.91 7.00 2.29 12.00 0.38 9.00 0Chariton Municipal Water Works 2006 40 0.00 0.51 0.51 1.42 9.00 0.57 14.00 0.42 11.00 0Chariton Municipal Water Works 2007 29 0.00 0.77 0.69 1.84 7.00 0.80 10.00 0.79 9.00 0Chariton Municipal Water Works 2008 32 0.00 0.76 0.77 1.35 6.00 0.69 13.00 0.57 8.00 0Chariton Municipal Water Works 2009 8 0.00 0.81 1.05 1.70 6.00 0.71 1.00 0.56 1.00 1
156 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Creston

Not enoughdata for 2006

Creston 2007 33 0.00 2.11 2.11 4.13 7.00 1.34 11.00 1.96 9.00 2Creston 2010 33 0.00 1.86 1.83 3.75 6.00 1.14 13.00 1.37 9.00 2Creston‐‐ 12 Mile Lake

Not enoughdata for 2007

Creston‐‐ 3 Mile Lake 2003 22 0.00 2.48 2.44 3.16 0.00 0.00 7.00 1.97 9.00 2Creston‐‐ 3 Mile Lake 2004 31 0.00 2.06 2.07 3.31 6.00 2.31 11.00 1.79 8.00 2Creston‐‐ 3 Mile Lake 2005 35 0.00 1.98 1.90 4.59 7.00 1.94 13.00 1.95 9.00 2Creston‐‐ 3 Mile Lake 2006 37 0.00 1.15 1.13 2.56 8.00 1.27 13.00 1.04 11.00 1Creston‐‐ 3 Mile Lake 2008 29 0.00 1.70 1.80 3.38 6.00 1.74 12.00 1.23 6.00 2Creston‐‐ 3 Mile Lake 2009 33 0.00 1.50 1.52 2.13 6.00 1.39 13.00 1.35 7.00 1Creston‐‐ 3 Mile Lake 2011 34 0.00 2.46 2.42 3.84 6.00 1.77 13.00 2.18 9.00 3Lamoni Municipal Utilities 2003 22 0.00 0.98 0.86 3.89 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.34 9.00 1Lamoni Municipal Utilities 2004 30 0.00 1.16 1.18 2.38 5.00 0.77 11.00 0.82 8.00 1Lamoni Municipal Utilities 2005 35 0.00 0.82 0.96 2.83 7.00 2.10 13.00 0.33 9.00 0Lamoni Municipal Utilities 2006 34 0.00 0.33 0.45 1.60 9.00 0.45 13.00 0.12 11.00 0Leon Water Works 2003 25 0.00 1.04 1.32 2.37 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.42 8.00 0Leon Water Works 2004 31 0.00 0.69 0.70 1.59 6.00 1.18 11.00 0.50 8.00 0Leon Water Works 2005 15 0.00 0.82 1.23 1.79 7.00 1.26 0.00 0.00 2.00 1Leon Water Works 2006 34 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.36 9.00 0.11 13.00 0.05 11.00 0Montezuma Municipal Water 2003 25 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.68 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.27 8.00 0Montezuma Municipal Water 2004 31 0.00 0.48 0.49 0.82 6.00 0.60 11.00 0.35 8.00 0Montezuma Municipal Water 2005 35 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.86 7.00 0.47 13.00 0.42 9.00 0Montezuma Municipal Water 2006 41 0.00 0.09 0.08 0.40 9.00 0.09 14.00 0.06 11.00 0Montezuma Municipal Water 2007 33 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.53 7.00 0.39 11.00 0.35 9.00 0Montezuma Municipal Water 2008 32 0.00 0.44 0.43 0.75 6.00 0.36 13.00 0.43 8.00 0
157 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Montezuma Municipal Water 2009 34 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.82 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.40 8.00 0Montezuma Municipal Water 2010 33 0.00 0.57 0.53 1.08 5.00 0.50 13.00 0.68 9.00 0Montezuma Municipal Water 2011 34 0.00 0.52 0.55 0.99 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.37 9.00 0Osceola Municipal Water Works 2003 18 0.00 1.69 1.66 3.95 0.00 0.00 7.00 1.60 7.00 0Osceola Municipal Water Works 2004 30 0.00 0.92 1.02 2.26 5.00 2.10 11.00 0.81 8.00 0Osceola Municipal Water Works 2005 34 0.00 0.76 0.83 1.40 7.00 1.22 12.00 0.50 9.00 0Osceola Municipal Water Works 2006 38 0.00 0.65 0.61 1.99 8.00 0.81 14.00 0.63 9.00 0Osceola Municipal Water Works 2007 32 0.00 0.53 0.52 0.82 7.00 0.69 10.00 0.59 9.00 0Osceola Municipal Water Works 2008 29 0.00 0.81 0.92 1.60 7.00 0.48 12.00 0.47 6.00 1Osceola Municipal Water Works 2009 14 0.00 0.90 0.82 1.57 5.00 1.18 9.00 0.72 0.00 0Rathbun Regional Water Association 2003 25 0.00 0.86 0.98 1.59 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.64 8.00 0Rathbun Regional Water Association 2004 31 0.00 1.01 1.09 1.79 6.00 1.61 11.00 0.65 8.00 0Rathbun Regional Water Association 2005 35 0.00 0.88 0.91 2.20 7.00 1.63 13.00 0.81 9.00 0Rathbun Regional Water Association 2006 34 0.00 0.70 0.68 1.42 9.00 0.65 13.00 0.65 11.00 0Winterset Water Treatment Plant 2003 22 0.00 1.80 1.65 3.02 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.61 8.00 1Winterset Water Treatment Plant 2004 31 0.00 0.59 0.67 1.90 6.00 1.50 11.00 0.37 8.00 0Winterset Water Treatment Plant 2005 35 0.00 0.71 0.67 5.21 7.00 0.56 13.00 0.95 9.00 0Winterset Water Treatment Plant 2006 41 0.00 0.41 0.38 1.54 9.00 0.66 14.00 0.42 11.00 0Winterset Water Treatment Plant 2007 33 0.00 0.53 0.53 1.12 7.00 0.43 11.00 0.66 9.00 0Winterset Water Treatment Plant 2008 30 0.00 0.47 0.44 1.43 5.00 0.37 13.00 0.52 7.00 0Winterset Water Treatment Plant 2009 16 0.00 0.51 0.45 1.15 6.00 0.36 10.00 0.61 0.00 0Aqua IL Vermillion Co 2003 25 0.00 3.04 1.95

16.67 0.00 0.00 11.00 5.67 8.00 1

Aqua IL Vermillion Co 2004 31 0.00 1.18 1.27

10.05 6.00 0.34 11.00 3.41 8.00 0

Aqua IL Vermillion Co 2005 34 0.00 2.12 1.72 8.83 7.00 0.44 12.00 3.45 9.00 2Aqua IL Vermillion Co 2006 39 0.00 1.21 1.09 6.27 8.00 0.60 14.00 1.80 10.00 1
158 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Aqua IL Vermillion Co 2007 32 0.00 1.50 1.33 6.20 7.00 0.47 10.00 2.12 9.00 1Aqua IL Vermillion Co 2008 33 0.00 1.38 1.11 5.12 7.00 0.44 12.00 1.86 9.00 1Aqua IL Vermillion Co 2009 34 0.00 1.64 1.31

12.04 6.00 0.54 13.00 2.75 8.00 1

Aqua IL Vermillion Co 2010 33 0.00 0.74 0.68 2.80 6.00 0.44 12.00 1.15 9.00 0Aqua IL Vermillion Co 2011 34 0.00 1.78 1.40

11.31 6.00 0.46 13.00 3.35 10.00 1

Ashland City Hall 2003 27 0.00 2.68 2.01 5.74 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.73 8.00 2Ashland City Hall 2004 30 0.00 1.45 1.54 3.22 6.00 2.40 10.00 1.32 8.00 1Ashland City Hall 2005 35 0.00 0.51 0.48 1.72 7.00 0.54 13.00 0.59 9.00 0Ashland City Hall 2006 37 0.00 0.29 0.28 1.29 8.00 0.48 13.00 0.24 9.00 0Ashland City Hall 2007 32 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.71 7.00 0.50 11.00 0.44 9.00 0Ashland City Hall 2008 30 0.00 0.87 0.89 2.14 6.00 0.41 12.00 0.55 7.00 1Ashland City Hall 2009 31 0.00 0.82 0.82 1.26 6.00 0.99 11.00 0.82 8.00 0Ashland City Hall 2010 29 0.00 2.25 1.60 5.69 4.00 0.47 13.00 3.25 9.00 1Ashland City Hall 2011 7 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.37 5.00 0.37 2.00 0.37 0.00 0Carlinville Water Works 2003 22 0.00 1.59 1.26 3.66 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.64 8.00 1Carlinville Water Works 2004 28 0.00 1.77 1.79

11.62 6.00 0.50 10.00 4.29 7.00 1

Carlinville Water Works 2005 33 0.00 0.64 0.61 2.13 7.00 0.38 12.00 0.38 9.00 1Carlinville Water Works 2006 32 0.00 0.84 0.84 6.40 8.00 1.02 11.00 1.58 8.00 0Carlinville Water Works 2007 33 0.00 1.12 1.06 2.70 6.00 0.74 13.00 1.33 9.00 1Carlinville Water Works 2008 29 0.00 1.10 0.92 3.57 5.00 0.65 13.00 1.35 7.00 1Carlinville Water Works 2009 28 0.00 2.15 1.77

12.54 5.00 1.12 11.00 2.98 7.00 2

Carlinville Water Works 2010 33 0.00 0.95 0.80 2.60 5.00 0.52 13.00 1.37 9.00 0Carlinville Water Works 2011 51 0.00 2.09 1.86

12.55 9.00 1.38 19.00 3.39 13.00 1

Carthage Public Utilities 2003 26 0.00 0.76 0.78 1.21 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.83 8.00 0
159 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Carthage Public Utilities 2004 30 0.00 0.53 0.53 1.54 6.00 0.29 11.00 0.39 8.00 0Carthage Public Utilities 2005 33 0.00 1.04 0.97 2.60 7.00 0.51 12.00 1.33 9.00 1Carthage Public Utilities 2006 33 0.00 0.47 0.47 1.62 9.00 1.00 13.00 0.32 10.00 0Centralia Water Treatment Plant 2003 28 0.00 1.47 0.85 9.03 0.00 0.00 14.00 1.92 8.00 0Centralia Water Treatment Plant 2004 31 0.00 0.82 0.76 1.54 6.00 0.58 11.00 1.00 8.00 1Centralia Water Treatment Plant 2005 35 0.00 1.68 1.39 5.80 7.00 0.40 13.00 2.81 9.00 1Centralia Water Treatment Plant 2006 38 0.00 2.04 1.84 7.23 8.00 1.15 14.00 3.03 9.00 1Centralia Water Treatment Plant 2007 32 0.00 3.05 2.62 8.44 7.00 2.54 11.00 5.39 9.00 1Centralia Water Treatment Plant 2008 33 0.00 2.06 1.87 5.06 7.00 1.76 13.00 2.46 8.00 1Centralia Water Treatment Plant 2009 33 0.00 2.22 2.02 3.83 6.00 2.33 12.00 3.05 8.00 1Centralia Water Treatment Plant 2010 33 0.00 1.53 1.35 3.57 5.00 0.89 13.00 1.95 9.00 1City of Waverly 2003 22 0.00 4.60 3.62

18.58 0.00 0.00 10.00 8.18 6.00 3

City of Waverly 2004 31 0.00 2.40 2.19 5.97 6.00 0.88 11.00 2.26 8.00 3City of Waverly 2005 33 0.00 1.64 1.58 4.65 7.00 0.47 11.00 1.46 9.00 3City of Waverly 2006 41 0.00 2.31 2.13

12.41 10.00 2.32 13.00 1.47 12.00 3

City of Waverly 2007 23 0.00 0.98 1.00 1.44 6.00 0.96 8.00 1.15 5.00 1City of Waverly 2008 26 0.00 1.36 1.13 7.96 6.00 0.67 10.00 1.70 7.00 1City of Waverly 2009 28 0.00 2.19 1.51 6.61 6.00 0.58 11.00 2.78 7.00 2City of Waverly 2010 18 0.00 0.86 0.69 3.42 1.00 0.37 8.00 1.50 4.00 0City of Waverly 2011 21 0.00 1.12 0.87 4.23 3.00 0.41 9.00 1.96 6.00 0Coulterville Water Treatment Plant 2003 27 0.00 3.20 2.39

10.87 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.27 8.00 5

Coulterville Water Treatment Plant 2004 31 0.00 1.89 1.84 2.78 6.00 1.06 11.00 2.03 8.00 2Coulterville Water Treatment Plant 2005 35 0.00 0.99 0.94 3.19 7.00 0.94 13.00 1.16 9.00 1Coulterville Water Treatment Plant 2006 39 0.00 1.65 1.40 4.81 8.00 1.19 14.00 2.11 10.00 1Coulterville Water Treatment Plant 2007 33 0.00 1.99 1.86 5.19 7.00 0.60 11.00 2.86 9.00 2
160 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Coulterville Water Treatment Plant 2008 32 0.00 0.70 0.66 3.54 6.00 0.55 13.00 0.89 8.00 0Coulterville Water Treatment Plant 2009 25 0.00 1.60 1.54 5.22 5.00 0.76 12.00 0.89 7.00 2Coulterville Water Treatment Plant 2010 21 0.00 0.60 0.62 0.78 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.68 9.00 0Coulterville Water Treatment Plant 2011 34 0.00 0.61 0.60 1.18 6.00 0.45 13.00 0.55 9.00 0Evansville

Not enoughdata for 2003

Evansville 2004 31 0.00 4.01 3.47

43.48 6.00 0.86 11.00 10.18 8.00 1

Evansville 2005 35 0.00 4.85 3.59

31.37 7.00 0.79 13.00 9.93 9.00 2

Evansville 2006 38 0.00 4.43 3.38

27.93 8.00 2.46 14.00 8.95 10.00 1

Evansville 2007 33 0.00 3.94 3.47

20.18 7.00 2.92 11.00 7.11 9.00 2

Evansville 2008 25 0.00 3.55 2.69

15.15 6.00 2.35 11.00 5.14 5.00 2

Evansville 2009 27 0.00 3.60 3.06

11.82 0.00 0.00 12.00 5.35 8.00 2

Evansville 2010 34 0.00 3.55 2.91

22.46 6.00 2.38 13.00 6.11 9.00 1

Evansville 2011 34 0.00 2.72 2.48

10.11 6.00 2.70 13.00 3.77 9.00 1

Fairfield 2010 22 0.00 0.78 0.71 3.01 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.72 6.00 0Fairfield 2011 39 0.00 1.48 1.60 3.23 6.00 2.74 13.00 1.63 7.00 1Farina Water Treatment Plant 2003 26 0.00 1.39 1.54 2.19 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.42 8.00 1Farina Water Treatment Plant 2004 31 0.00 1.44 1.48 3.17 6.00 2.16 11.00 1.31 8.00 1Farina Water Treatment Plant 2005 35 0.00 2.14 2.16 8.71 7.00 1.09 13.00 2.09 9.00 2Farina Water Treatment Plant 2006 36 0.00 4.02 3.66 9.52 8.00 5.08 14.00 4.04 9.00 2Farina Water Treatment Plant 2007 40 0.00 4.36 4.51 8.93 7.00 6.95 11.00 4.82 9.00 2Farina Water Treatment Plant 2008 33 0.00 5.19 5.18 8.21 6.00 4.82 10.00 5.73 8.00 4Farina Water Treatment Plant 2009 39 0.00 5.02 5.69

14.00 6.00 11.63 13.00 5.29 7.00 3

Farina Water Treatment Plant 2010 41 0.00 4.62 4.35 8.05 6.00 4.25 13.00 5.86 9.00 2
161 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Farina Water Treatment Plant 2011 39 0.00 5.09 5.28 9.79 6.00 8.21 13.00 4.81 8.00 2Flora Water Treatment Plant 2004 25 0.00 1.39 1.32 3.78 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.43 8.00 1Flora Water Treatment Plant 2005 35 0.00 3.96 3.65

39.72 7.00 0.55 13.00 6.57 9.00 1

Flora Water Treatment Plant 2006 37 0.00 4.75 4.24

26.75 6.00 2.43 14.00 6.37 10.00 0

Flora Water Treatment Plant 2007 40 0.00 2.97 3.02

16.11 7.00 3.86 11.00 4.35 9.00 1

Flora Water Treatment Plant 2008 20 0.00 6.70 3.46

30.56 6.00 4.64 13.00 6.95 1.00 1

Gillespie Water Treatment Plant 2003 27 0.00 1.07 0.87 1.81 0.00 0.00 13.00 0.70 8.00 1Gillespie Water Treatment Plant 2004 31 0.00 1.10 1.26 2.70 6.00 1.11 11.00 0.51 8.00 1Gillespie Water Treatment Plant 2005 35 0.00 0.68 0.69 2.26 7.00 0.69 13.00 0.69 9.00 0Gillespie Water Treatment Plant 2006 39 0.00 1.48 1.39 4.52 8.00 0.64 14.00 1.85 10.00 1Gillespie Water Treatment Plant 2007 33 0.00 2.55 2.44 3.59 7.00 2.72 11.00 2.97 9.00 2Gillespie Water Treatment Plant 2008 31 0.00 1.14 1.24 2.45 6.00 2.07 13.00 0.88 7.00 1Gillespie Water Treatment Plant 2009 7 0.00 3.37 3.15 3.86 6.00 3.40 1.00 3.06 0.00 0Greenfield Water Treatment Plant 2003 27 0.00 1.25 1.28 1.97 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.14 8.00 1Greenfield Water Treatment Plant 2004 31 0.00 0.96 1.04 3.45 6.00 1.70 11.00 0.60 8.00 1Greenfield Water Treatment Plant 2005 35 0.00 0.36 0.38 0.78 7.00 0.43 13.00 0.31 9.00 0Greenfield Water Treatment Plant 2006 31 0.00 0.11 0.09 0.76 8.00 0.15 12.00 0.06 10.00 0Hettick Water Supply 2003 15 0.00 1.79 1.06 4.84 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.83 5.00 3Hettick Water Supply

Not enoughdata for 2004

Highland Water Treatment Plant 2003 27 0.00 0.59 0.72 1.91 0.00 0.00 13.00 0.88 8.00 0Highland Water Treatment Plant 2004 31 0.00 0.25 0.27 0.43 6.00 0.29 11.00 0.20 8.00 0Highland Water Treatment Plant 2005 34 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.82 7.00 0.51 12.00 0.42 9.00 0Highland Water Treatment Plant 2006 32 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.46 9.00 0.15 13.00 0.05 8.00 0Hillsboro

Not enoughdata for 2006
162 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Hillsboro 2007 39 0.00 1.50 1.48 2.01 6.00 1.46 11.00 1.39 9.00 1Hillsboro 2008 35 0.00 1.55 1.60 4.06 6.00 1.70 12.00 1.58 8.00 2Hillsboro 2010 40 0.00 1.69 1.45 7.90 5.00 0.57 13.00 3.22 9.00 1Hillsboro‐ Glenn Shoals 2003 20 0.00 2.04 1.60 4.57 0.00 0.00 8.00 2.03 9.00 1Hillsboro‐ Glenn Shoals 2004 26 0.00 1.26 1.34 6.25 5.00 1.12 11.00 2.23 7.00 1Hillsboro‐ Glenn Shoals 2005 23 0.00 1.55 1.33 3.79 5.00 0.46 10.00 1.91 5.00 1Hillsboro‐ Glenn Shoals 2006 29 0.00 1.08 1.03 3.89 7.00 1.12 10.00 1.11 7.00 0Hillsboro‐ Glenn Shoals 2009 40 0.00 1.62 1.71 4.79 6.00 2.40 13.00 1.98 8.00 1Hillsboro‐ Glenn Shoals 2011 40 0.00 1.49 1.42 6.51 6.00 1.27 13.00 2.15 8.00 1Hillsboro‐‐Lake

Not enoughdata for 2007

Holiday Shores Sanitary District 2003 24 0.00 2.34 1.88 3.16 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.86 8.00 2Holiday Shores Sanitary District 2004 31 0.00 2.38 2.37 3.36 6.00 1.95 11.00 2.30 8.00 2Holiday Shores Sanitary District 2005 35 0.00 1.46 1.44 5.59 7.00 1.96 13.00 1.68 9.00 1Holiday Shores Sanitary District 2006 32 0.00 0.99 0.85 3.92 8.00 1.47 13.00 0.67 10.00 0Kaskaskia Water District 2003 27 0.00 1.86 1.45 6.78 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.29 8.00 1Kaskaskia Water District 2004 31 0.00 1.30 1.17 8.00 6.00 0.81 11.00 2.48 8.00 0Kaskaskia Water District 2005 35 0.00 1.66 1.35

17.90 7.00 0.52 13.00 3.19 9.00 0

Kaskaskia Water District 2006 39 0.00 1.16 1.06 6.95 8.00 1.36 14.00 1.85 10.00 0Kaskaskia Water District 2007 33 0.00 1.38 1.31 5.90 7.00 1.27 11.00 2.53 9.00 0Kaskaskia Water District 2008 30 0.00 1.06 0.98 2.88 6.00 1.06 12.00 1.30 8.00 0Kaskaskia Water District 2009 34 0.00 1.61 1.53 3.22 6.00 2.12 13.00 1.98 8.00 1Kaskaskia Water District 2010 33 0.00 1.85 1.57 9.63 5.00 1.21 13.00 3.18 9.00 0Kaskaskia Water District 2011 34 0.00 1.54 1.46 4.09 6.00 1.96 13.00 1.96 9.00 1Kinkaid Area Water System 2003 27 0.00 2.41 1.94 4.26 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.92 8.00 2Kinkaid Area Water System 2004 31 0.00 2.49 2.39 5.67 6.00 1.88 11.00 2.62 8.00 2
163 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Kinkaid Area Water System 2005 34 0.00 1.30 1.29 3.28 7.00 1.66 12.00 1.62 9.00 1Kinkaid Area Water System 2006 39 0.00 0.69 0.58 3.20 9.00 0.80 13.00 0.54 10.00 0Kinkaid Area Water System 2007 32 0.00 0.67 0.67 0.91 7.00 0.63 11.00 0.63 9.00 0Kinkaid Area Water System 2008 32 0.00 0.78 0.77 1.26 6.00 0.58 13.00 0.72 8.00 0Kinkaid Area Water System 2009 7 0.00 0.89 0.82 1.04 6.00 0.90 1.00 0.80 0.00 0Mattoon

Not enoughdata for 2006

Mattoon 2007 24 0.00 0.88 0.80 2.17 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.15 8.00 0Mattoon 2008 32 0.00 2.88 2.74 6.60 6.00 5.81 13.00 3.52 8.00 1Mattoon 2009 32 0.00 5.09 5.42

19.84 6.00 11.72 12.00 2.96 7.00 2

Mattoon 2010 31 0.00 2.55 3.29

12.99 5.00 8.30 12.00 2.86 8.00 0

Mattoon 2011 34 0.00 2.21 2.16 6.96 6.00 3.15 13.00 2.61 9.00 0Mt. Olive Water Works 2003 21 0.00 6.96 4.51

11.57 0.00 0.00 7.00 4.42 8.00 7

Mt. Olive Water Works 2004 31 0.00 2.55 2.62 5.20 6.00 3.37 11.00 2.88 8.00 2Mt. Olive Water Works 2005 35 0.00 0.45 0.46 1.81 7.00 0.55 13.00 0.49 9.00 0Mt. Olive Water Works 2006 41 0.00 2.73 2.75

11.86 9.00 1.85 14.00 2.25 11.00 4

Mt. Olive Water Works 2007 33 0.00 3.14 3.12 6.36 7.00 1.86 11.00 3.58 9.00 3Mt. Olive Water Works 2008 32 0.00 3.53 3.08

17.68 6.00 3.23 13.00 3.85 8.00 3

Mt. Olive Water Works 2009 34 0.00 1.72 1.59 4.71 6.00 1.03 13.00 1.77 8.00 2Mt. Olive Water Works 2010 34 0.00 0.78 0.76 1.27 6.00 0.63 13.00 0.83 9.00 0Mt. Olive Water Works 2011 35 0.00 0.80 0.76 1.68 6.00 0.59 13.00 0.82 10.00 0Nashville Water Plant 2003 19 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.18 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.11 8.00 0Nashville Water Plant 2004 31 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.43 6.00 0.35 11.00 0.22 8.00 0Nashville Water Plant 2005 35 0.00 0.38 0.40 0.77 7.00 0.51 13.00 0.29 9.00 0Nashville Water Plant 2006 41 0.00 0.21 0.19 0.92 9.00 0.09 14.00 0.34 10.00 0
164 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Nashville Water Plant 2007 33 0.00 0.57 0.57 0.83 7.00 0.55 11.00 0.61 9.00 0Nashville Water Plant 2008 31 0.00 0.41 0.43 0.66 5.00 0.56 13.00 0.40 8.00 0Nashville Water Plant 2009 15 0.00 0.46 0.38 0.86 6.00 0.36 9.00 0.47 0.00 0New Berlin

Not enoughdata for 2003

New Berlin 2004 27 0.00 0.53 0.56 0.90 4.00 0.78 10.00 0.59 8.00 0New Berlin 2005 34 0.00 0.44 0.42 1.71 7.00 0.34 13.00 0.54 9.00 0New Berlin 2006 31 0.00 0.26 0.30 1.08 6.00 0.13 13.00 0.16 10.00 0New Berlin 2007 28 0.00 0.50 0.53 0.80 5.00 0.59 10.00 0.51 9.00 0New Berlin 2008 19 0.00 0.66 0.64 1.17 4.00 0.58 10.00 0.69 3.00 0New Berlin 2009 26 0.00 0.76 0.73 1.31 6.00 0.44 12.00 0.76 5.00 0New Berlin 2010 25 0.00 0.63 0.61 1.47 5.00 0.58 11.00 0.74 3.00 0New Berlin 2011 33 0.00 0.83 0.81 1.13 6.00 0.54 12.00 0.90 9.00 0Otter Lake Water Commission 2003 24 0.00 1.31 1.11 4.16 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.27 7.00 1Otter Lake Water Commission 2004 31 0.00 0.89 0.89 1.38 6.00 1.01 11.00 0.91 8.00 1Otter Lake Water Commission 2005 34 0.00 0.86 0.73 4.06 7.00 0.49 13.00 1.27 8.00 0Otter Lake Water Commission 2006 32 0.00 0.19 0.15 2.23 9.00 0.43 11.00 0.07 11.00 0Palmyra‐Modesto Water Commission 2003 18 0.00 2.72 3.54 5.42 0.00 0.00 5.00 4.52 8.00 1Palmyra‐Modesto Water Commission 2004 30 0.00 1.97 2.01 3.40 6.00 2.82 10.00 2.09 8.00 1Palmyra‐Modesto Water Commission 2005 34 0.00 0.60 0.60 1.63 7.00 0.64 12.00 0.59 9.00 0Palmyra‐Modesto Water Commission 2006 34 0.00 0.58 0.39 4.54 9.00 0.52 13.00 0.26 11.00 0Paris

Not enoughdata for 2003

Paris 2004 31 0.00 0.98 0.96 3.22 6.00 0.36 11.00 0.55 8.00 2Paris 2005 33 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.96 6.00 0.46 12.00 0.36 9.00 0Paris 2006 39 0.00 1.11 1.06 7.29 8.00 0.63 14.00 1.56 10.00 1Paris 2007 30 0.00 0.70 0.66 2.22 6.00 0.81 10.00 0.76 9.00 0
165 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Paris 2008 30 0.00 1.35 1.28 3.75 6.00 1.27 12.00 1.13 8.00 1Paris 2009 26 0.00 1.25 1.02 5.26 6.00 0.71 11.00 1.69 6.00 0Paris

Not enoughdata for 2010

Patoka‐‐ East Reservoir 2006 18 0.00 2.40 4.80

15.40 3.00 13.68 13.00 0.91 2.00 2

Patoka‐‐ N Fork Kaskaskia River 2006 18 0.00 2.71 5.60

17.87 3.00 15.82 13.00 1.02 2.00 2

Patoka‐‐West Reservoir 2006 17 0.00 0.49 0.59 1.12 2.00 0.60 13.00 0.44 2.00 0Pittsfield Water Treatment Plant 2003 25 0.00 1.49 1.41 3.31 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.80 8.00 1Pittsfield Water Treatment Plant 2004 31 0.00 0.99 1.00 2.37 6.00 1.34 11.00 0.95 8.00 0Pittsfield Water Treatment Plant 2005 34 0.00 0.38 0.39 0.59 7.00 0.43 12.00 0.31 9.00 0Pittsfield Water Treatment Plant 2006 34 0.00 0.16 0.09 1.85 10.00 0.10 12.00 0.09 11.00 0Salem Water Treatment Plant 2003 24 0.00 0.90 0.68 3.33 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.89 7.00 0Salem Water Treatment Plant 2004 31 0.00 0.61 0.58 1.18 6.00 0.38 11.00 0.60 8.00 0Salem Water Treatment Plant 2005 35 0.00 1.02 1.03 4.24 7.00 0.51 13.00 1.02 9.00 0Salem Water Treatment Plant 2006 34 0.00 1.62 1.29

10.13 9.00 3.88 13.00 1.07 11.00 0

Springfield City Water, Light, and Power 2003 25 0.00 2.23 1.98 3.65 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.94 8.00 2Springfield City Water, Light, and Power 2004 31 0.00 1.55 1.63 2.93 6.00 1.84 11.00 0.91 8.00 2Springfield City Water, Light, and Power 2005 35 0.00 0.72 0.75 1.44 7.00 0.82 13.00 0.49 9.00 1Springfield City Water, Light, and Power 2006 34 0.00 0.69 0.68 3.34 9.00 0.77 13.00 0.35 11.00 1Vermont Water Treatment Plant 2003 25 0.00 0.60 0.48 1.54 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.80 8.00 0Vermont Water Treatment Plant 2004 31 0.00 0.26 0.29 0.59 6.00 0.47 11.00 0.18 8.00 0Vermont Water Treatment Plant 2005 35 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.69 7.00 0.53 13.00 0.49 9.00 0Vermont Water Treatment Plant 2006 41 0.00 0.21 0.20 1.54 9.00 0.35 14.00 0.12 11.00 0Vermont Water Treatment Plant 2007 33 0.00 0.93 0.86 2.86 7.00 0.39 11.00 1.33 9.00 0Vermont Water Treatment Plant 2008 32 0.00 0.47 0.45 0.89 7.00 0.47 13.00 0.45 7.00 0
166 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Vermont Water Treatment Plant 2009 34 0.00 1.55 1.30 8.90 6.00 0.35 13.00 2.37 8.00 1Vermont Water Treatment Plant 2010 34 0.00 1.23 1.00 9.43 6.00 0.77 13.00 2.50 9.00 0Vermont Water Treatment Plant 2011 34 0.00 1.10 0.92 4.63 6.00 0.37 13.00 1.71 9.00 0Wayne City Skillet Creek 2003 25 0.00 0.65 0.62 1.02 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.48 8.00 0Wayne City Skillet Creek 2004 30 0.00 1.05 1.10 2.25 6.00 1.02 11.00 0.62 8.00 1Wayne City Skillet Creek 2005 35 0.00 1.03 1.00 2.20 7.00 0.74 13.00 1.06 9.00 1Wayne City Skillet Creek 2006 40 0.00 0.98 0.93 2.32 9.00 1.04 13.00 0.86 11.00 1Wayne City Skillet Creek 2007 33 0.00 1.56 1.55 2.36 7.00 1.53 11.00 1.62 9.00 1Wayne City Skillet Creek 2008 29 0.00 1.89 1.99 3.41 6.00 1.75 11.00 1.31 7.00 2Wayne City Skillet Creek 2009 15 0.00 2.41 1.90 3.58 6.00 3.11 9.00 1.81 0.00 0Wayne City Skillet Creek 1899 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Wayne City Skillet Creek 2003 25 0.00 0.65 0.62 1.02 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.48 8.00 0Wayne City Skillet Creek

Not enoughdata for 2006

Batesville Water Treatment Plant 2003 24 0.00 2.45 2.10 5.18 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.12 8.00 3Batesville Water Treatment Plant 2004 31 0.00 1.72 1.83 3.17 6.00 1.45 11.00 0.70 8.00 2Batesville Water Treatment Plant 2005 35 0.00 1.10 1.14 3.58 7.00 1.61 13.00 0.73 9.00 1Batesville Water Treatment Plant 2006 41 0.00 1.17 1.20 3.51 9.00 0.81 14.00 0.49 11.00 2Batesville Water Treatment Plant 2007 33 0.00 0.76 0.78 1.41 7.00 1.12 11.00 0.71 9.00 0Batesville Water Treatment Plant 2008 32 0.00 1.86 1.77 4.76 6.00 1.40 12.00 1.54 9.00 2Batesville Water Treatment Plant 2009 33 0.00 1.31 1.28 2.42 5.00 1.89 13.00 1.43 8.00 1Batesville Water Treatment Plant 2010 31 0.00 2.25 2.12 3.89 3.00 2.32 13.00 2.71 9.00 2Batesville Water Treatment Plant 2011 35 0.00 0.60 0.62 1.13 7.00 1.01 13.00 0.56 9.00 0Bedford Water Department 2003 23 0.00 2.63 1.45

28.36 0.00 0.00 11.00 4.20 8.00 0

Bedford Water Department 2004 31 0.00 0.81 0.79 6.43 6.00 0.30 11.00 2.32 8.00 0Bedford Water Department 2005 34 0.00 0.99 0.83 6.17 6.00 0.62 13.00 1.67 9.00 0
167 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Bedford Water Department 2006 41 0.00 1.13 0.99 9.76 9.00 0.87 14.00 1.96 11.00 0Bedford Water Department 2007 33 0.00 0.53 0.48 3.79 7.00 0.39 11.00 0.76 9.00 0Bedford Water Department 2008 32 0.00 0.80 0.65 5.36 6.00 0.43 13.00 1.30 8.00 0Bedford Water Department 2009 34 0.00 0.62 0.54 2.52 6.00 0.41 13.00 0.98 8.00 0Bedford Water Department 2010 34 0.00 0.80 0.66 4.43 6.00 0.42 13.00 1.39 9.00 0Bedford Water Department 2011 139 0.00 1.02 0.67 6.82 6.00 0.39 91.00 1.23 36.00 0Fort Wayne‐Three River Filtration Plant 2003 24 0.00 1.09 0.72 5.50 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.50 8.00 0Fort Wayne‐Three River Filtration Plant 2004 31 0.00 1.05 0.93 4.40 6.00 0.33 11.00 1.86 8.00 1Fort Wayne‐Three River Filtration Plant 2005 33 0.00 0.79 0.72 2.59 7.00 0.48 11.00 1.03 9.00 0Fort Wayne‐Three River Filtration Plant 2006 36 0.00 0.69 0.54 3.32 9.00 0.45 9.00 0.79 11.00 0Fort Wayne‐Three River Filtration Plant 2007 33 0.00 0.88 0.78 4.11 7.00 0.51 11.00 1.41 9.00 0Fort Wayne‐Three River Filtration Plant 2008 30 0.00 1.14 0.85 7.13 6.00 0.40 11.00 1.57 8.00 0Fort Wayne‐Three River Filtration Plant 2009 8 0.00 0.49 0.78 1.20 6.00 0.40 1.00 0.35 1.00 1INpolis‐‐Eagle Creek Water Treatment Plant 2003 23 0.00 1.58 1.29 4.43 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.55 7.00 2INpolis‐‐Eagle Creek Water Treatment Plant 2004 31 0.00 1.22 1.22 2.56 6.00 0.51 11.00 0.76 8.00 1INpolis‐‐Eagle Creek Water Treatment Plant 2005 35 0.00 1.59 1.46 5.60 7.00 0.48 13.00 1.97 9.00 2INpolis‐‐Eagle Creek Water Treatment Plant 2006 37 0.00 0.60 0.64 2.82 9.00 0.63 12.00 0.17 10.00 0Jasper Municipal Water 2003 25 0.00 0.94 0.61 7.43 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.49 8.00 0Jasper Municipal Water 2004 31 0.00 0.55 0.53 2.04 6.00 0.35 11.00 0.67 8.00 0Jasper Municipal Water 2005 34 0.00 0.54 0.50 1.75 7.00 0.47 13.00 0.67 9.00 0Jasper Municipal Water 2006 41 0.00 0.33 0.28 2.98 9.00 0.35 14.00 0.60 11.00 0Jasper Municipal Water 2007 33 0.00 0.43 0.41 1.02 7.00 0.38 11.00 0.51 9.00 0Jasper Municipal Water 2008 32 0.00 0.40 0.39 1.16 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.48 8.00 0Jasper Municipal Water 2009 7 0.00 0.38 0.39 0.40 6.00 0.38 1.00 0.39 0.00 0Logansport

Not enoughdata for 2003
168 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Logansport 2004 31 0.00 1.23 1.03

10.59 6.00 0.40 11.00 2.41 8.00 0

Logansport 2005 34 0.00 1.15 0.91

13.97 7.00 0.50 13.00 2.02 8.00 0

Logansport 2006 39 0.00 1.88 1.70

19.95 8.00 2.57 14.00 3.05 10.00 0

Logansport 2007 33 0.00 0.69 0.65 2.51 7.00 0.59 11.00 0.96 9.00 0Logansport 2008 31 0.00 2.11 1.48

26.87 6.00 0.64 13.00 4.00 8.00 0

Logansport 2009 34 0.00 0.92 0.77 5.23 6.00 0.54 13.00 1.59 8.00 0Logansport 2010 34 0.00 1.43 1.10 7.43 6.00 0.42 13.00 2.94 9.00 0Logansport 2011 34 0.00 1.30 1.02

16.05 6.00 0.52 13.00 2.44 9.00 0

Logansport 1899 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Logansport 2006 35 0.00 1.38 1.03

19.95 7.00 0.37 13.00 2.98 9.00 0

Logansport 2010 34 0.00 1.43 1.10 7.43 6.00 0.42 13.00 2.94 9.00 0Mitchell Water Plant 2005 26 0.00 2.17 1.61

15.36 0.00 0.00 11.00 5.19 9.00 0

Mitchell Water Plant 2006 38 0.00 1.90 1.57

21.04 8.00 0.54 14.00 4.44 10.00 0

Mitchell Water Plant 2007 30 0.00 0.87 0.73 3.09 6.00 0.61 11.00 1.13 8.00 0Mitchell Water Plant 2008 27 0.00 1.33 1.03 7.31 6.00 0.67 11.00 2.15 7.00 0Mitchell Water Plant 2009 28 0.00 0.79 0.64 3.82 2.00 0.59 12.00 1.22 6.00 0Mitchell Water Plant 2010 17 0.00 1.76 0.92 7.15 5.00 0.38 11.00 2.59 1.00 0North Vernon

Not enoughdata for 2006

North Vernon 2007 18 0.00 1.65 1.30 4.03 0.00 0.00 5.00 1.44 8.00 1North Vernon 2008 28 0.00 2.36 1.95

11.19 7.00 1.32 11.00 3.01 6.00 1

North Vernon 2009 33 0.00 2.72 2.13

14.27 6.00 0.89 13.00 4.19 7.00 1

North Vernon 2010 36 0.00 2.26 2.02 8.76 6.00 1.43 13.00 3.70 11.00 1
169 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

North Vernon 2011 139 0.00 2.62 1.93

24.67 6.00 1.41 91.00 3.33 36.00 0

Santee Utilities Inc. 2003 21 0.00 2.76 1.93 7.01 0.00 0.00 7.00 1.94 8.00 3Santee Utilities Inc. 2004 31 0.00 1.89 1.88 6.40 6.00 0.48 11.00 2.53 8.00 2Santee Utilities Inc. 2005 35 0.00 2.45 1.81

15.87 7.00 0.44 13.00 5.86 9.00 0

Santee Utilities Inc. 2006 39 0.00 0.75 0.63 3.59 9.00 1.18 13.00 0.46 11.00 0Santee Utilities Inc. 1899 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Santee Utilities Inc. 2005 35 0.00 2.45 1.81

15.87 7.00 0.44 13.00 5.86 9.00 0

Stucker Fork Water Utility 2003 24 0.00 1.15 1.04

14.47 0.00 0.00 9.00 3.09 9.00 0

Stucker Fork Water Utility 2004 31 0.00 0.99 1.27

11.83 6.00 0.33 11.00 3.62 8.00 0

Stucker Fork Water Utility 2005 32 0.00 1.37 1.03

10.77 6.00 0.52 12.00 2.55 9.00 0

Stucker Fork Water Utility 2006 40 0.00 1.83 1.25

11.55 9.00 0.62 13.00 2.80 10.00 0

Stucker Fork Water Utility 2007 38 0.00 0.62 0.61 4.14 7.00 0.47 10.00 1.17 9.00 0Stucker Fork Water Utility 2008 36 0.00 1.37 1.09

11.02 7.00 0.39 13.00 2.77 7.00 0

Stucker Fork Water Utility 2009 37 0.00 0.51 0.48 2.19 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.74 6.00 0Stucker Fork Water Utility 2010 37 0.00 1.01 0.89

13.01 5.00 0.37 13.00 1.90 6.00 0

Stucker Fork Water Utility 2011 38 0.00 0.84 0.76 6.66 6.00 0.39 12.00 1.33 7.00 0Versailles Water Works 2003 25 0.00 4.54 2.52

42.60 0.00 0.00 11.00 6.58 10.00 2

Versailles Water Works 2004 29 0.00 3.58 3.56

31.39 5.00 0.53 11.00 10.52 8.00 2

Versailles Water Works 2005 35 0.00 6.49 4.73

36.82 7.00 0.32 13.00 13.68 9.00 3

Versailles Water Works 2006 33 0.00 2.01 1.77

26.25 9.00 4.27 11.00 0.91 9.00 1

Versailles Water Works 2007 31 0.00 0.43 0.44 0.73 6.00 0.48 11.00 0.39 8.00 0Versailles Water Works 2008 29 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.93 6.00 0.36 12.00 0.40 6.00 0
170 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Versailles Water Works 2009 29 0.00 0.58 0.51 3.41 6.00 0.39 12.00 0.85 5.00 0Versailles Water Works 2010 31 0.00 0.41 0.40 0.59 5.00 0.40 13.00 0.44 7.00 0Versailles Water Works 2011 33 0.00 0.39 0.39 0.50 6.00 0.37 12.00 0.38 9.00 0Westport Water Company 2003 22 0.00 2.32 1.55

25.92 0.00 0.00 10.00 2.19 7.00 1

Westport Water Company 2004 29 0.00 1.26 1.16 2.53 5.00 0.74 11.00 1.61 7.00 1Westport Water Company 2005 32 0.00 0.98 0.85 3.37 6.00 0.71 12.00 1.26 9.00 0Westport Water Company 2006 38 0.00 2.03 2.04

23.43 7.00 0.68 13.00 2.01 11.00 0

Westport Water Company 2007 32 0.00 1.15 1.06 4.13 7.00 0.80 11.00 1.36 8.00 1Westport Water Company 2008 30 0.00 0.92 0.91 1.57 5.00 0.84 13.00 0.83 8.00 1Westport Water Company 2009 27 0.00 0.80 0.77 1.18 3.00 0.67 11.00 0.73 7.00 0Westport Water Company 2010 32 0.00 1.08 1.06 1.87 6.00 0.63 13.00 1.07 9.00 1Westport Water Company 2011 34 0.00 1.24 1.25 2.47 6.00 0.71 13.00 0.92 9.00 2Winslow Water Works 2003 24 0.00 2.57 1.50

24.61 0.00 0.00 11.00 4.23 8.00 1

Winslow Water Works 2004 31 0.00 1.82 1.31

12.60 6.00 0.34 11.00 3.79 8.00 0

Winslow Water Works 2005 32 0.00 1.29 1.15

10.66 7.00 0.38 13.00 2.30 8.00 1

Winslow Water Works 2006 39 0.00 2.20 2.01

18.46 7.00 2.17 14.00 4.40 11.00 1

Winslow Water Works 2007 32 0.00 0.63 0.58 2.04 7.00 0.45 11.00 1.00 9.00 0Winslow Water Works 2008 33 0.00 0.81 0.72 5.30 7.00 0.52 13.00 1.32 8.00 0Winslow Water Works 2009 34 0.00 1.14 0.89 7.33 6.00 0.37 13.00 1.95 8.00 0Winslow Water Works 2010 32 0.00 1.47 1.07 7.48 4.00 0.41 13.00 2.91 9.00 0Winslow Water Works 2011 33 0.00 0.59 0.51 2.14 6.00 0.38 13.00 0.73 8.00 0Altoona 2004 17 0.00 0.79 1.42 2.85 0.00 0.00 5.00 2.45 6.00 0Altoona 2005 33 0.00 0.70 0.66 4.97 7.00 0.62 11.00 1.15 9.00 0Altoona 2006 41 0.00 1.02 0.78

13.09 9.00 0.49 14.00 2.30 11.00 0
171 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Altoona 2007 27 0.00 0.72 0.61 3.19 7.00 0.49 11.00 1.02 3.00 0Altoona 2008 31 0.00 1.04 0.80 6.43 6.00 0.41 13.00 1.84 8.00 0Altoona 2009 30 0.00 0.65 0.53 2.12 6.00 0.35 13.00 1.01 7.00 0Atchison

Not enoughdata for 2003

Atchison 2004 31 0.00 0.74 0.64 2.91 6.00 0.39 11.00 1.12 8.00 0Atchison 2005 31 0.00 1.37 0.99

10.58 6.00 0.44 13.00 2.42 8.00 0

Atchison 2006 38 0.00 0.43 0.29 4.15 7.00 0.46 14.00 0.36 10.00 0Atchison 2007 33 0.00 0.77 0.77 3.48 7.00 0.41 11.00 1.65 9.00 0Atchison 2008 32 0.00 1.34 1.01 7.19 7.00 0.45 12.00 2.47 8.00 0Atchison 2009 34 0.00 0.93 0.77 8.58 6.00 0.39 13.00 1.78 8.00 0Atchison 2010 34 0.00 1.43 1.13 5.28 6.00 0.48 13.00 2.52 9.00 1Atchison 2011 131 0.00 0.44 0.43 0.99 6.00 0.44 90.00 0.45 29.00 0Baxter Springs Water Treatment Plant 2005 28 0.00 1.30 0.83

14.10 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.31 9.00 0

Baxter Springs Water Treatment Plant 2006 37 0.00 0.45 0.28 6.87 7.00 0.05 14.00 0.70 9.00 0Baxter Springs Water Treatment Plant 2007 33 0.00 1.10 0.99 7.39 7.00 0.39 11.00 2.72 9.00 0Baxter Springs Water Treatment Plant 2008 33 0.00 0.82 0.62

12.06 7.00 0.35 13.00 1.41 8.00 0

Baxter Springs Water Treatment Plant 2009 33 0.00 0.43 0.41 1.03 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.52 8.00 0Baxter Springs Water Treatment Plant 2010 33 0.00 1.12 0.86

12.72 5.00 0.38 13.00 2.24 8.00 0

Baxter Springs Water Treatment Plant 2011 32 0.00 1.27 0.94

12.04 6.00 0.38 12.00 2.51 9.00 0

Beloit Water Department 2003 21 0.00 2.04 1.88 5.36 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.91 8.00 2Beloit Water Department 2004 30 0.00 1.76 1.73 4.11 6.00 1.67 11.00 1.55 7.00 2Beloit Water Department 2005 35 0.00 2.88 2.32

37.22 7.00 1.38 13.00 5.61 9.00 1

Beloit Water Department 2006 40 0.00 1.07 0.90

14.26 9.00 0.57 14.00 1.24 9.00 0
172 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Beloit Water Department 2007 32 0.00 2.42 2.28

11.62 7.00 1.48 11.00 5.13 9.00 1

Beloit Water Department 2008 29 0.00 4.29 3.23

46.16 5.00 1.84 12.00 7.35 7.00 1

Beloit Water Department 2009 34 0.00 1.54 1.45 8.52 6.00 1.28 13.00 2.04 8.00 1Beloit Water Department 2010 34 0.00 1.82 1.72 7.41 6.00 1.44 13.00 2.03 9.00 1Beloit Water Department 2011 34 0.00 2.07 1.95 4.77 6.00 1.36 13.00 2.00 9.00 2Burlington City Water Works 2003 21 0.00 2.29 2.35 3.67 0.00 0.00 7.00 2.87 8.00 2Burlington City Water Works 2004 31 0.00 1.14 1.09 3.29 6.00 0.97 11.00 1.32 8.00 1Burlington City Water Works 2005 33 0.00 1.06 1.00 3.97 7.00 0.47 11.00 2.00 9.00 1Burlington City Water Works 2006 41 0.00 0.98 0.94 5.10 9.00 0.88 13.00 0.85 12.00 1Burlington City Water Works 2007 31 0.00 0.89 0.88 1.88 7.00 0.79 10.00 1.05 8.00 1Burlington City Water Works 2008 31 0.00 1.45 1.19 3.77 6.00 1.05 13.00 2.27 8.00 0Burlington City Water Works 2009 34 0.00 0.89 0.77 2.23 6.00 0.56 13.00 1.00 8.00 1Burlington City Water Works 2010 34 0.00 1.66 1.33 9.44 6.00 0.48 13.00 2.91 9.00 1Burlington City Water Works 2011 33 0.00 1.47 1.40 2.78 6.00 0.76 12.00 1.30 9.00 2Caney Water Treatment Plant 2005 25 0.00 0.54 0.49 2.32 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.75 8.00 0Caney Water Treatment Plant 2006 36 0.00 0.90 0.65

21.05 6.00 0.05 14.00 2.15 9.00 0

Caney Water Treatment Plant 2007 33 0.00 0.44 0.41 1.98 7.00 0.40 11.00 0.54 9.00 0Caney Water Treatment Plant 2008 28 0.00 0.44 0.41 1.36 6.00 0.35 12.00 0.51 8.00 0Caney Water Treatment Plant 2009 32 0.00 0.46 0.42 3.56 5.00 0.35 13.00 0.63 8.00 0Caney Water Treatment Plant 2010 22 0.00 0.44 0.42 1.12 4.00 0.37 12.00 0.55 3.00 0Caney Water Treatment Plant 2011 34 0.00 0.68 0.59 4.75 6.00 0.37 13.00 1.15 9.00 0Chanute 2006 26 0.00 0.58 0.96 1.86 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.07 9.00 0Chanute 2007 31 0.00 1.10 0.94 5.24 7.00 0.59 10.00 1.68 8.00 0Chanute 2008 31 0.00 1.40 1.06 7.36 7.00 0.73 12.00 2.63 8.00 0Chanute 2009 34 0.00 0.77 0.63 2.23 6.00 0.49 13.00 0.90 8.00 0
173 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Chanute 2010 33 0.00 1.92 1.63

10.52 6.00 0.89 12.00 4.45 9.00 0

Chanute 2011 34 0.00 1.25 1.08 6.59 6.00 0.66 13.00 2.02 9.00 0Chetopa

Not enoughdata for 2006

Chetopa 2007 17 0.00 1.59 1.01 4.98 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.88 4.00 0Chetopa 2008 23 0.00 1.30 1.15 7.21 7.00 0.90 6.00 2.54 7.00 0Chetopa 2009 28 0.00 0.80 0.66 2.89 6.00 0.53 11.00 1.24 7.00 0Chetopa 2010 27 0.00 1.63 1.16

10.51 3.00 0.62 11.00 2.70 8.00 0

Chetopa 2011 30 0.00 1.63 1.41 9.05 4.00 0.55 10.00 2.78 10.00 0City of Carbondale 2003 23 0.00 2.39 2.12 3.72 0.00 0.00 9.00 2.49 8.00 1City of Carbondale 2004 25 0.00 1.46 1.60 3.22 5.00 2.50 10.00 2.05 4.00 1City of Carbondale 2005 31 0.00 1.20 1.09 3.74 7.00 0.32 10.00 0.68 9.00 2City of Carbondale 2006 42 0.00 1.50 1.44 3.20 9.00 1.02 14.00 1.82 12.00 1City of Carbondale 2007 31 0.00 1.83 1.82 3.65 7.00 2.01 10.00 1.38 8.00 2City of Carbondale 2008 28 0.00 1.22 1.04 3.19 6.00 1.58 12.00 1.46 7.00 0City of Carbondale 2009 7 0.00 0.38 0.44 0.47 6.00 0.36 1.00 0.47 0.00 0City of Emporia 2003 24 0.00 1.30 0.87 3.34 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.10 8.00 1City of Emporia 2004 31 0.00 0.57 0.48 2.47 6.00 0.35 11.00 0.54 8.00 0City of Emporia 2005 34 0.00 0.75 0.64 2.14 7.00 0.58 13.00 0.98 9.00 0City of Emporia 2006 40 0.00 0.33 0.26 2.07 9.00 0.19 14.00 0.30 11.00 0City of Emporia 2007 34 0.00 0.78 0.75 2.35 7.00 0.45 12.00 1.18 9.00 0City of Emporia 2008 30 0.00 0.76 0.67 3.43 6.00 0.62 12.00 0.95 8.00 0City of Emporia 2009 34 0.00 0.74 0.69 3.03 6.00 0.42 13.00 0.91 8.00 0City of Emporia 2010 34 0.00 0.80 0.71 2.55 6.00 0.48 13.00 0.85 9.00 0City of Emporia 2011 34 0.00 0.79 0.75 1.85 6.00 0.61 13.00 0.89 9.00 0City of Osawatomie 2003 21 0.00 1.78 3.25 6.95 0.00 0.00 8.00 3.72 8.00 0
174 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

City of Osawatomie 2004 31 0.00 1.68 1.75

11.82 6.00 0.83 11.00 4.17 8.00 1

City of Osawatomie 2005 34 0.00 1.64 1.40

15.97 7.00 0.66 12.00 2.79 9.00 1

City of Osawatomie 2006 41 0.00 1.45 1.21 6.56 10.00 1.03 14.00 1.49 10.00 1City of Osawatomie 2007 32 0.00 1.29 1.23 3.08 6.00 1.10 11.00 1.85 9.00 0City of Osawatomie 2008 32 0.00 1.80 1.52

10.42 6.00 1.34 13.00 2.73 8.00 1

City of Osawatomie 2009 34 0.00 1.47 1.24 5.39 6.00 0.81 13.00 2.45 8.00 1City of Osawatomie 2010 32 0.00 1.85 1.41

11.14 5.00 0.51 13.00 3.28 9.00 1

City of Osawatomie 2011 138 0.00 2.32 1.58

17.21 6.00 1.02 90.00 2.93 36.00 1

City of Valley Falls 2003 21 0.00 2.24 2.58 9.59 0.00 0.00 7.00 5.66 8.00 1City of Valley Falls 2004 31 0.00 1.15 1.03 3.08 6.00 0.86 11.00 1.92 8.00 0City of Valley Falls 2005 35 0.00 1.84 1.43 8.50 7.00 0.87 13.00 3.46 9.00 0City of Valley Falls 2006 41 0.00 1.19 1.00 4.56 9.00 1.15 14.00 1.71 11.00 0City of Valley Falls 2007 33 0.00 1.29 1.24 3.49 7.00 1.12 11.00 2.16 9.00 0City of Valley Falls 2008 32 0.00 1.77 1.54 4.33 7.00 2.35 12.00 2.29 8.00 1City of Valley Falls 2009 7 0.00 0.69 1.02 1.15 6.00 0.63 1.00 1.13 0.00 0Coffeyville 2011 25 0.00 2.52 2.74

18.50 0.00 0.00 10.00 5.09 9.00 0

Ellsworth RWD #1 2003 20 0.00 1.30 1.04 2.12 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.62 8.00 1Ellsworth RWD #1 2004 30 0.00 1.37 1.41 2.46 5.00 1.53 11.00 1.07 8.00 1Ellsworth RWD #1 2005 34 0.00 0.89 0.90 1.68 7.00 1.27 13.00 0.85 8.00 0Ellsworth RWD #1 2006 41 0.00 0.31 0.29 1.47 8.00 0.33 15.00 0.23 11.00 0Ellsworth RWD #1 2007 29 0.00 1.07 1.08 1.95 7.00 0.65 9.00 0.92 9.00 1Ellsworth RWD #1 2008 31 0.00 1.42 1.32 4.46 6.00 1.18 12.00 1.63 8.00 1Ellsworth RWD #1 2009 32 0.00 0.87 0.90 1.42 6.00 1.15 13.00 0.80 7.00 0Ellsworth RWD #1 2010 34 0.00 1.56 1.51 3.62 6.00 0.79 13.00 1.20 9.00 2
175 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Ellsworth RWD #1 2011 34 0.00 1.31 1.32 1.57 6.00 1.36 13.00 1.23 9.00 1Erie

Not enoughdata for 2003

Erie 2004 31 0.00 1.62 1.36

14.29 6.00 0.91 11.00 2.85 8.00 1

Erie 2005 33 0.00 1.34 1.24

10.96 7.00 0.44 11.00 3.17 9.00 0

Erie 2006 41 0.00 1.25 1.12 6.59 9.00 1.39 14.00 1.52 11.00 0Erie 2007 31 0.00 1.31 1.13 5.62 7.00 0.84 11.00 2.09 8.00 0Erie 2008 31 0.00 1.73 1.32 7.28 7.00 1.03 12.00 2.91 8.00 0Erie 2009 33 0.00 0.88 0.75 2.48 5.00 0.68 13.00 1.33 8.00 0Erie 2010 34 0.00 1.29 1.11 8.19 6.00 0.99 13.00 2.30 9.00 0Erie 2011 34 0.00 1.11 0.97 5.51 6.00 0.75 13.00 1.69 9.00 0Franklin County RWD #6

Not enoughdata for 2003

Franklin County RWD #6 2004 31 0.00 1.47 1.36 4.03 6.00 0.95 11.00 2.57 8.00 1Franklin County RWD #6 2005 34 0.00 1.42 1.25 6.15 7.00 0.71 12.00 2.18 9.00 1Franklin County RWD #6 2006 39 0.00 1.05 1.00 4.50 9.00 1.34 14.00 1.25 10.00 0Franklin County RWD #6 2007 32 0.00 0.81 0.82 1.60 7.00 0.76 11.00 0.94 8.00 0Franklin County RWD #6 2008 31 0.00 1.20 0.97 4.47 6.00 0.72 13.00 1.67 8.00 0Franklin County RWD #6 2009 33 0.00 0.85 0.76 2.37 6.00 0.55 13.00 1.13 7.00 0Franklin County RWD #6 2010 34 0.00 1.40 1.20 6.49 6.00 0.49 13.00 2.11 9.00 1Franklin County RWD #6 2011 34 0.00 1.38 1.30 3.82 6.00 0.98 13.00 1.64 9.00 1Harveyville 2006 22 0.00 0.92 0.99 1.59 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.04 7.00 0Harveyville 2007 14 0.00 0.75 0.78 1.31 4.00 1.20 2.00 0.84 5.00 0Harveyville 2008 5 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.44 5.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Herington 2011 25 0.00 1.18 1.21 1.44 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.27 9.00 1Howard 2010 17 0.00 0.58 0.89 1.33 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.31 9.00 0
176 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Howard 2011 32 0.00 0.48 0.53 1.65 5.00 0.58 11.00 0.49 10.00 0Humboldt 2011 16 0.00 1.16 1.25 1.63 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.39 9.00 1Iola 2009 23 0.00 0.73 0.66 1.59 1.00 0.73 7.00 0.81 8.00 0Iola 2010 34 0.00 1.29 1.04 7.41 6.00 0.60 13.00 2.31 9.00 0Iola 2011 139 0.00 1.39 1.13 5.63 6.00 0.70 91.00 1.57 36.00 1Kickapoo Tribal Waterworks 2009 8 0.00 0.72 0.73 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0Kickapoo Tribal Waterworks 2010 22 0.00 2.49 1.62 9.42 2.00 0.69 6.00 3.65 10.00 1Kickapoo Tribal Waterworks 2011 29 0.00 1.46 1.30 2.79 3.00 1.07 12.00 1.74 8.00 1KS City BD of Public Utilities

Not enoughdata for 2003

KS City BD of Public Utilities 2004 31 0.00 0.46 0.41 1.68 6.00 0.33 11.00 0.58 8.00 0KS City BD of Public Utilities 2005 33 0.00 0.81 0.67 3.65 7.00 0.57 13.00 1.09 8.00 0KS City BD of Public Utilities 2006 39 0.00 0.25 0.20 1.77 8.00 0.25 14.00 0.15 10.00 0KS City BD of Public Utilities 2007 33 0.00 0.58 0.54 1.63 7.00 0.38 11.00 0.87 9.00 0KS City BD of Public Utilities 2008 31 0.00 0.72 0.58 2.09 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.88 8.00 0KS City BD of Public Utilities 2009 28 0.00 0.57 0.49 1.00 5.00 0.35 10.00 0.71 8.00 0KS City BD of Public Utilities 2010 34 0.00 0.59 0.53 1.34 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.72 9.00 0KS City BD of Public Utilities 2011 34 0.00 0.47 0.44 0.72 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.51 9.00 0La Cygne 2006 26 0.00 1.05 1.25 3.33 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.94 9.00 0La Cygne 2007 33 0.00 0.99 0.97 2.13 7.00 0.83 11.00 1.32 8.00 0La Cygne 2008 27 0.00 1.56 1.31 4.52 6.00 1.08 12.00 2.26 7.00 1La Cygne 2009 31 0.00 1.27 1.12 2.88 3.00 1.13 13.00 1.65 8.00 1La Cygne 2010 32 0.00 1.63 1.56 5.07 6.00 0.85 12.00 2.00 8.00 1La Cygne 2011 32 0.00 1.85 1.72 5.21 6.00 1.89 12.00 2.42 8.00 1LeRoy

Not enoughdata for 2007

Linn Valley Lakes POA 2003 20 0.00 0.79 0.75 1.21 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.65 6.00 0
177 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Linn Valley Lakes POA 2004 31 0.00 0.67 0.69 1.40 6.00 0.95 11.00 0.60 8.00 0Linn Valley Lakes POA 2005 33 0.00 0.43 0.44 1.00 5.00 0.49 13.00 0.42 9.00 0Linn Valley Lakes POA 2006 22 0.00 0.15 0.24 0.61 9.00 0.14 10.00 0.18 2.00 0Linn Valley Lakes POA 2007 21 0.00 0.41 0.38 0.54 7.00 0.44 11.00 0.40 3.00 0Linn Valley Lakes POA 2008 10 0.00 0.38 0.37 0.45 5.00 0.41 3.00 0.35 0.00 0Linn Valley Lakes POA 2009 10 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.35 0.00 0Linn Valley Lakes POA 2010 34 0.00 1.08 1.01 2.38 6.00 0.37 13.00 1.14 9.00 1Linn Valley Lakes POA 2011 29 0.00 0.87 0.86 1.12 6.00 1.01 9.00 0.87 9.00 0Lyndon

Not enoughdata for 2007

Marais Des Cygnes Public Utility Authority 2011 17 0.00 1.41 1.46 2.45 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.60 9.00 1Miami Co. RWD #2 2003 20 0.00 0.59 0.56 1.86 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.98 7.00 0Miami Co. RWD #2 2004 30 0.00 0.66 0.75 1.78 5.00 0.92 11.00 0.31 8.00 0Miami Co. RWD #2 2005 33 0.00 1.39 1.21 3.74 7.00 1.07 12.00 1.24 9.00 1Miami Co. RWD #2 2006 37 0.00 0.57 0.59 1.63 9.00 0.88 12.00 0.42 10.00 0Miami Co. RWD #2 2007 33 0.00 0.95 0.99 1.87 7.00 1.17 11.00 0.94 9.00 0Miami Co. RWD #2 2008 31 0.00 0.64 0.65 1.33 6.00 0.97 13.00 0.59 8.00 0Miami Co. RWD #2 2009 27 0.00 0.76 0.75 1.59 6.00 0.86 6.00 0.85 8.00 0Miami Co. RWD #2 2010 34 0.00 0.62 0.62 1.16 6.00 0.60 13.00 0.67 9.00 0Miami Co. RWD #2 2011 33 0.00 0.66 0.66 0.98 6.00 0.69 13.00 0.62 8.00 0Milford

Not enoughdata for 2003

Milford 2004 31 0.00 2.27 2.23 3.19 6.00 2.11 11.00 2.06 8.00 2Milford 2005 35 0.00 2.16 2.04 4.16 7.00 2.02 13.00 2.40 9.00 2Milford 2006 39 0.00 0.83 0.78 2.81 8.00 0.71 14.00 0.55 10.00 0Milford 2007 33 0.00 1.14 1.13 1.60 7.00 1.16 11.00 1.17 9.00 1Milford 2008 33 0.00 1.43 1.41 2.37 7.00 1.39 13.00 1.41 8.00 1
178 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Milford 2009 33 0.00 1.14 1.13 1.93 6.00 1.70 13.00 1.36 8.00 0Milford 2010 35 0.00 0.90 0.87 1.89 7.00 0.65 13.00 0.89 9.00 1Milford 2011 35 0.00 0.93 0.94 1.77 7.00 0.99 13.00 0.95 9.00 0Mitchell Co. RWD #2 2003 21 0.00 2.17 2.11 2.78 0.00 0.00 7.00 2.04 8.00 2Mitchell Co. RWD #2 2004 31 0.00 1.97 1.96 2.73 6.00 2.20 11.00 1.85 8.00 2Mitchell Co. RWD #2 2005 35 0.00 1.69 1.57 3.40 7.00 1.61 13.00 1.75 9.00 1Mitchell Co. RWD #2 2006 38 0.00 0.86 0.81 2.42 9.00 0.91 12.00 0.76 10.00 0Mitchell Co. RWD #2 2007 30 0.00 1.48 1.45 2.07 6.00 1.22 9.00 1.30 9.00 1Mitchell Co. RWD #2 2008 32 0.00 1.82 1.80 3.72 6.00 1.64 13.00 1.95 8.00 1Mitchell Co. RWD #2 2009 35 0.00 1.59 1.61 1.99 6.00 1.68 13.00 1.54 9.00 1Mitchell Co. RWD #2 2010 35 0.00 1.64 1.64 2.88 6.00 1.62 14.00 1.62 9.00 1Mitchell Co. RWD #2 2011 33 0.00 1.77 1.71 2.49 6.00 1.27 12.00 1.64 9.00 1Neodesha 2011 26 0.00 0.85 0.65 5.35 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.31 9.00 0Olathe‐‐ Composite of Collector Wells 2010 35 0.00 0.87 0.85 1.46 6.00 0.79 13.00 0.92 10.00 0Olathe‐‐ Composite of Collector Wells 2011 30 0.00 0.85 0.84 1.26 6.00 0.84 13.00 0.79 9.00 0Olathe‐‐ WP1 2003 6 0.00 0.92 0.64 1.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0Olathe‐‐ WP1 2004 8 0.00 0.38 0.23 1.33 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.14 7.00 0Olathe‐‐ WP1 2005 16 0.00 0.61 0.91 1.24 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.64 6.00 0Olathe‐‐ WP1

Not enoughdata for 2006

Olathe‐‐River 2003 24 0.00 1.67 1.33 2.59 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.54 8.00 1Olathe‐‐River 2004 31 0.00 1.03 1.04 2.20 6.00 1.20 11.00 1.14 8.00 1Olathe‐‐River 2005 32 0.00 1.04 0.95 2.88 6.00 0.86 11.00 1.27 9.00 1Olathe‐‐River 2006 38 0.00 0.73 0.67 4.19 9.00 0.34 13.00 0.72 11.00 1Olathe‐‐River 2007 33 0.00 0.97 0.98 1.37 7.00 0.88 11.00 0.99 9.00 1Olathe‐‐River 2008 32 0.00 1.01 1.01 1.39 6.00 1.16 13.00 0.94 8.00 1
179 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Olathe‐‐River 2009 33 0.00 0.82 0.81 1.32 6.00 0.85 13.00 0.79 8.00 0Olathe‐‐River 2011 4 0.00 0.86 0.82 1.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Osage Co RWD #3 2004 31 0.00 1.84 1.74 3.63 6.00 1.50 11.00 2.04 8.00 2Osage Co RWD #3 2005 35 0.00 1.98 1.70 9.40 7.00 1.12 13.00 2.92 9.00 1Osage Co RWD #3 2006 37 0.00 1.37 1.28 3.52 8.00 0.90 13.00 1.47 9.00 1Osage Co RWD #3 2007 32 0.00 1.58 1.52 3.55 6.00 1.61 11.00 2.04 9.00 1Osage Co RWD #3 2008 29 0.00 1.68 1.54 5.58 3.00 1.84 13.00 2.13 8.00 1Osage Co RWD #3 2009 34 0.00 1.62 1.52 5.31 6.00 1.37 13.00 2.17 8.00 1Osage Co RWD #3 2010 33 0.00 2.21 1.82 7.59 6.00 0.70 12.00 3.51 9.00 1Osage Co RWD #3 2011 34 0.00 1.66 1.60 3.63 6.00 1.73 13.00 1.79 9.00 1Osage Co. RWD #3 2003 24 0.00 1.98 1.80 5.54 0.00 0.00 10.00 2.38 8.00 1Osage Co. RWD #3

Not enoughdata for 2006

Oswego 2009 20 0.00 1.37 1.03 3.86 0.00 0.00 5.00 1.53 8.00 1Oswego 2010 33 0.00 2.17 1.69

15.90 5.00 1.01 13.00 4.44 9.00 0

Oswego 2011 34 0.00 1.37 1.20 8.91 6.00 0.79 13.00 2.20 9.00 1Paola

Not enoughdata for 2003

Paola 2004 31 0.00 0.69 0.71 1.20 6.00 0.87 11.00 0.64 8.00 0Paola 2005 34 0.00 1.27 1.16 3.33 7.00 0.63 12.00 1.13 9.00 2Paola 2006 40 0.00 0.65 0.66 3.20 9.00 0.97 14.00 0.53 10.00 0Paola 2007 32 0.00 1.06 1.03 1.43 7.00 0.71 11.00 1.24 8.00 1Paola 2008 31 0.00 0.87 0.83 1.47 6.00 0.79 13.00 0.94 8.00 0Paola 2009 22 0.00 1.43 1.50 2.62 5.00 0.62 13.00 1.51 4.00 1Public Wholesale WSD #12 2003 24 0.00 1.81 1.70 3.70 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.79 8.00 1Public Wholesale WSD #12 2004 31 0.00 1.10 1.17 2.05 6.00 1.78 11.00 0.91 8.00 1Public Wholesale WSD #12 2005 34 0.00 1.05 1.04 2.31 7.00 0.96 11.00 0.80 9.00 1
180 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Public Wholesale WSD #12 2006 42 0.00 0.81 0.80 2.42 10.00 0.77 14.00 0.72 12.00 0Public Wholesale WSD #12 2007 32 0.00 1.18 1.19 1.71 7.00 1.27 11.00 1.32 8.00 1Public Wholesale WSD #12 2008 30 0.00 1.18 1.18 2.04 6.00 1.03 12.00 0.96 8.00 1Public Wholesale WSD #12 2009 34 0.00 0.83 0.79 1.33 5.00 0.68 13.00 0.79 9.00 0Public Wholesale WSD #12 2010 33 0.00 1.49 1.45 2.93 6.00 0.77 13.00 1.62 8.00 1Public Wholesale WSD #12 2011 33 0.00 1.28 1.31 1.73 6.00 1.25 13.00 1.14 8.00 1Public Wholesale WSD #5

Not enoughdata for 2003

Public Wholesale WSD #5 2004 31 0.00 0.98 0.92 2.12 6.00 0.89 11.00 1.21 8.00 1Public Wholesale WSD #5 2005 34 0.00 1.00 0.80 4.39 7.00 0.41 13.00 1.44 9.00 0Public Wholesale WSD #5 2006 38 0.00 0.76 0.72 3.02 8.00 0.28 14.00 0.74 9.00 0Public Wholesale WSD #5 2007 31 0.00 0.96 0.95 2.63 7.00 0.80 10.00 1.33 8.00 0Public Wholesale WSD #5 2008 31 0.00 1.48 1.18 4.88 6.00 1.15 13.00 2.38 8.00 0Public Wholesale WSD #5 2009 31 0.00 0.90 0.83 2.14 5.00 0.55 13.00 1.14 6.00 1Public Wholesale WSD #5 2010 33 0.00 1.79 1.45 5.37 5.00 0.62 13.00 3.00 9.00 1Public Wholesale WSD #5 2011 34 0.00 1.51 1.42 3.56 6.00 0.79 13.00 1.66 9.00 1Richmond

Not enoughdata for 2003

Richmond 2004 30 0.00 2.81 2.49 6.76 6.00 1.33 11.00 2.75 8.00 3Richmond 2005 32 0.00 1.67 1.37 7.76 6.00 1.13 12.00 2.27 9.00 1Richmond 2006 37 0.00 0.86 0.78 5.86 8.00 0.70 14.00 0.51 8.00 1Richmond 2007 26 0.00 0.61 0.61 1.15 5.00 0.81 10.00 0.64 7.00 0Richmond 2008 23 0.00 3.72 2.35

15.74 2.00 0.37 12.00 3.82 7.00 4

Richmond 2009 32 0.00 0.48 0.49 0.71 5.00 0.66 12.00 0.48 8.00 0Richmond 2010 33 0.00 2.10 1.70 6.42 6.00 0.39 13.00 3.37 8.00 1Richmond 2011 34 0.00 2.16 2.08 4.69 6.00 1.03 13.00 1.94 9.00 2Salina Not enough
181 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

data for 2006

Salina 2007 23 0.00 0.73 0.64 1.35 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.61 9.00 0Salina 2008 28 0.00 0.73 0.72 1.27 5.00 0.52 12.00 0.71 6.00 0Salina 2009 34 0.00 0.62 0.58 3.04 6.00 0.54 13.00 0.72 8.00 0Salina 2010 34 0.00 0.75 0.73 1.42 6.00 0.39 13.00 0.72 9.00 1Salina 2011 34 0.00 0.71 0.66 4.37 6.00 0.47 13.00 0.91 9.00 0Spring Hill 2004 4 0.00 7.36 5.51

10.80 0.00 0.00 4.00 4.95 0.00 0

Spring Hill

Not enoughdata for 2006

St. Paul

Not enoughdata for 2003

St. Paul 2004 31 0.00 1.72 1.52

10.66 6.00 0.99 11.00 3.14 8.00 1

St. Paul 2005 33 0.00 1.08 0.98

10.99 7.00 0.44 11.00 2.37 9.00 0

St. Paul 2006 41 0.00 0.94 0.82 4.54 9.00 0.91 14.00 1.15 11.00 0St. Paul 2007 31 0.00 1.17 1.00 5.05 7.00 0.87 11.00 1.72 8.00 0St. Paul 2008 27 0.00 1.40 1.09 7.13 5.00 0.93 11.00 2.60 8.00 0St. Paul 2009 32 0.00 0.39 0.37 0.58 6.00 0.35 12.00 0.41 8.00 0St. Paul 2010 34 0.00 0.49 0.46 3.38 6.00 0.46 13.00 0.65 9.00 0St. Paul 2011 34 0.00 0.41 0.40 1.19 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.48 9.00 0Topeka Water Treatment Plant 2003 24 0.00 1.87 1.65 5.22 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.89 8.00 2Topeka Water Treatment Plant 2004 31 0.00 1.58 1.58 3.07 6.00 1.71 11.00 1.31 8.00 1Topeka Water Treatment Plant 2005 35 0.00 1.35 1.20 3.93 7.00 1.06 13.00 1.86 9.00 1Topeka Water Treatment Plant 2006 41 0.00 0.95 0.80 7.37 9.00 0.29 14.00 0.95 11.00 1Topeka Water Treatment Plant 2007 33 0.00 1.42 1.45 2.87 7.00 1.23 11.00 1.61 9.00 1Topeka Water Treatment Plant 2008 29 0.00 1.90 1.62 6.98 6.00 1.08 13.00 2.24 7.00 1Topeka Water Treatment Plant 2009 23 0.00 1.46 1.29 3.57 6.00 1.02 6.00 1.77 8.00 1
182 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Leitchfield Water Works 2003 25 0.00 2.35 1.52

11.84 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.93 8.00 2

Leitchfield Water Works 2004 31 0.00 2.08 1.90 4.91 6.00 0.40 11.00 2.56 8.00 3Leitchfield Water Works 2005 35 0.00 1.23 1.07 2.97 7.00 0.62 13.00 1.52 9.00 1Leitchfield Water Works 2006 40 0.00 0.41 0.35 2.71 9.00 0.31 13.00 0.45 11.00 0Leitchfield Water Works 2007 26 0.00 0.72 0.64 1.85 7.00 0.38 6.00 0.86 7.00 0Leitchfield Water Works 2008 30 0.00 0.94 0.79 3.00 6.00 0.35 11.00 1.25 8.00 0Leitchfield Water Works 2009 33 0.00 0.78 0.69 2.06 6.00 0.37 12.00 1.07 8.00 0Leitchfield Water Works 2010 33 0.00 1.63 1.42 4.26 5.00 0.37 13.00 2.27 8.00 1Leitchfield Water Works 2011 34 0.00 0.97 0.87 2.69 6.00 0.37 13.00 1.10 9.00 1Livermore 2006 25 0.00 1.22 1.14 6.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 2.21 9.00 0Livermore 2007 32 0.00 0.82 0.93 3.98 6.00 0.44 7.00 1.82 7.00 0Livermore 2008 30 0.00 1.41 1.21 7.29 6.00 0.39 13.00 2.42 6.00 0Livermore 2009 28 0.00 0.96 0.83 3.94 5.00 0.35 9.00 1.59 4.00 0Livermore 2010 31 0.00 3.01 2.23

23.24 5.00 0.37 12.00 5.80 5.00 1

Livermore 2011 36 0.00 1.00 0.91 5.54 7.00 0.59 10.00 1.37 7.00 0Livermore 1899 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Livermore 2006 23 0.00 1.21 1.65 6.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 2.82 9.00 0Marion Water Treatment Plant 2003 25 0.00 0.81 0.77 2.37 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.08 8.00 0Marion Water Treatment Plant 2004 31 0.00 1.69 1.65 3.36 6.00 0.45 11.00 2.05 8.00 2Marion Water Treatment Plant 2006 4 0.00 1.68 1.38 3.68 1.00 3.03 1.00 0.00 2.00 2Marion Water Treatment Plant‐‐Lake

George 2005 35 0.00 0.53 0.54 0.94 7.00 0.63 13.00 0.39 9.00 0

Marion Water Treatment Plant‐‐Lake

George 2006 37 0.00 0.13 0.11 1.71 7.00 0.09 14.00 0.08 9.00 0

Marion Water Treatment Plant‐‐Lake

George 2007 33 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.45 7.00 0.38 11.00 0.35 9.00 0

Marion Water Treatment Plant‐‐Lake

George 2008 27 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.52 3.00 0.35 13.00 0.36 7.00 0
183 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Marion Water Treatment Plant‐‐Lake

George 2009 4 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.35 4.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

Marion Water Treatment Plant‐‐Old Lake

Not enoughdata for 2007

Webster Co Water District 2003 25 0.00 1.54 1.82 5.20 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.61 8.00 0Webster Co Water District 2004 30 0.00 1.43 1.15 6.06 6.00 0.40 10.00 2.68 8.00 1Webster Co Water District 2005 35 0.00 1.10 0.95 5.56 8.00 0.55 12.00 1.92 9.00 0Webster Co Water District 2006 42 0.00 0.36 0.28 2.69 10.00 0.50 14.00 0.33 11.00 0Webster Co Water District 2007 33 0.00 0.44 0.43 0.90 7.00 0.38 11.00 0.47 9.00 0Webster Co Water District 2008 31 0.00 0.47 0.42 1.61 5.00 0.35 13.00 0.60 8.00 0Webster Co Water District 2009 32 0.00 0.44 0.41 0.85 6.00 0.35 12.00 0.52 7.00 0Webster Co Water District 2010 32 0.00 0.73 0.66 5.76 5.00 0.37 12.00 1.17 9.00 0Webster Co Water District 2011 33 0.00 0.83 0.72 3.79 6.00 0.40 12.00 1.15 9.00 0E. Jefferson Water Works Dist. #1 2003 28 0.00 0.96 1.21 3.01 0.00 0.00 6.00 1.91 14.00 0E. Jefferson Water Works Dist. #1 2004 44 0.00 0.83 0.84 3.15 9.00 0.44 11.00 1.47 13.00 1E. Jefferson Water Works Dist. #1 2005 37 0.00 0.86 0.75 2.51 8.00 0.43 13.00 1.07 8.00 1E. Jefferson Water Works Dist. #1 2006 51 0.00 0.45 0.42 2.18 10.00 0.28 14.00 0.76 15.00 0E. Jefferson Water Works Dist. #1 2007 42 0.00 0.72 0.70 1.28 8.00 0.53 11.00 0.84 13.00 0E. Jefferson Water Works Dist. #1 2008 44 0.00 0.74 0.72 2.20 10.00 0.61 13.00 0.95 12.00 0E. Jefferson Water Works Dist. #1 2009 46 0.00 0.67 0.66 1.35 9.00 0.62 13.00 0.90 13.00 0E. Jefferson Water Works Dist. #1 2010 44 0.00 0.72 0.70 2.08 8.00 0.49 12.00 1.07 13.00 0E. Jefferson Water Works Dist. #1 2011 45 0.00 0.65 0.63 1.14 8.00 0.50 13.00 0.78 13.00 0Iberville Water District #3 2003 32 0.00 1.80 1.74

13.03 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.62 10.00 1

Iberville Water District #3 2004 44 0.00 1.75 1.64

11.68 9.00 1.67 11.00 2.04 13.00 1

Iberville Water District #3 2005 43 0.00 2.18 1.96

16.77 9.00 3.26 13.00 2.34 10.00 1

Iberville Water District #3 2006 52 0.00 0.73 0.68 3.61 11.00 0.42 14.00 1.05 14.00 0
184 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Iberville Water District #3 2007 44 0.00 1.47 1.48 8.60 9.00 0.61 11.00 3.46 13.00 1Iberville Water District #3 2008 42 0.00 1.10 1.04 4.84 10.00 0.70 13.00 1.78 11.00 1Iberville Water District #3 2009 44 0.00 1.04 0.96 5.82 9.00 1.29 13.00 1.33 11.00 0Iberville Water District #3 2010 43 0.00 0.89 0.83 5.16 8.00 0.41 11.00 1.37 13.00 1Iberville Water District #3 2011 45 0.00 0.81 0.81 2.71 8.00 0.82 13.00 1.06 13.00 0LaFourche Water Dist. #1 2003 32 0.00 1.19 1.58 3.27 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.95 12.00 1LaFourche Water Dist. #1 2004 42 0.00 1.06 1.02 3.62 8.00 0.65 11.00 1.62 12.00 1LaFourche Water Dist. #1 2005 43 0.00 1.26 1.14

10.24 9.00 1.03 13.00 2.16 10.00 0

LaFourche Water Dist. #1 2006 52 0.00 0.69 0.60 7.47 11.00 0.37 14.00 0.78 14.00 0LaFourche Water Dist. #1 2007 43 0.00 0.83 0.80 5.97 9.00 0.58 11.00 0.81 13.00 1LaFourche Water Dist. #1 2008 43 0.00 0.88 0.82 4.27 10.00 0.55 13.00 1.12 11.00 1LaFourche Water Dist. #1 2009 40 0.00 0.75 0.72 3.11 9.00 0.61 13.00 1.17 8.00 0LaFourche Water Dist. #1 2010 44 0.00 1.26 1.33

11.27 7.00 0.75 13.00 1.21 13.00 1

LaFourche Water Dist. #1 2011 44 0.00 0.94 0.93 4.86 8.00 1.08 13.00 1.21 12.00 1Thibodaux Water Works 2008 43 0.00 1.00 0.94 4.88 10.00 0.64 13.00 1.61 11.00 0Thibodaux Water Works 2009 10 0.00 0.70 0.78 0.92 9.00 0.69 1.00 0.82 0.00 0Thibodeaux Water Works 2003 34 0.00 1.10 1.42 3.61 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.00 12.00 0Thibodeaux Water Works 2004 44 0.00 1.07 1.06 4.01 9.00 0.60 11.00 1.92 13.00 1Thibodeaux Water Works 2005 41 0.00 1.27 1.07

12.16 9.00 0.60 13.00 2.26 9.00 0

Thibodeaux Water Works 2006 52 0.00 0.56 0.58 4.44 11.00 0.49 14.00 1.05 14.00 0Thibodeaux Water Works 2007 44 0.00 0.83 0.83 2.92 9.00 0.61 11.00 1.07 13.00 1Bucklin Water Department 2003 21 0.00 0.30 0.55 1.22 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.54 7.00 0Bucklin Water Department 2004 31 0.00 0.30 0.33 1.08 6.00 0.31 11.00 0.17 8.00 0Bucklin Water Department 2005 31 0.00 0.38 0.40 0.62 6.00 0.56 12.00 0.28 8.00 0Bucklin Water Department 2006 36 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.53 9.00 0.10 12.00 0.07 10.00 0
185 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Bucklin Water Department 2007 29 0.00 0.36 0.37 0.45 6.00 0.38 10.00 0.35 7.00 0Bucklin Water Department 2008 25 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.62 4.00 0.48 9.00 0.36 7.00 0Bucklin Water Department 2009 7 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.38 6.00 0.35 1.00 0.35 0.00 0Cameron Light & Power 2003 21 0.00 1.12 0.84 1.59 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.60 9.00 1Cameron Light & Power 2004 31 0.00 0.98 1.09 2.82 6.00 2.19 11.00 0.61 8.00 0Cameron Light & Power 2005 34 0.00 0.47 0.49 1.08 7.00 0.63 12.00 0.37 9.00 0Cameron Light & Power 2006 42 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.78 10.00 0.14 14.00 0.15 11.00 0Cameron Light & Power 2007 33 0.00 0.51 0.53 0.87 7.00 0.62 11.00 0.43 9.00 0Cameron Light & Power 2008 28 0.00 0.63 0.59 1.10 5.00 0.73 11.00 0.74 7.00 0Cameron Light & Power 2009 34 0.00 0.53 0.49 1.29 6.00 0.36 13.00 0.57 8.00 0Cameron Light & Power 2010 34 0.00 0.52 0.49 1.34 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.64 9.00 0Cameron Light & Power 2011 34 0.00 0.80 0.73 2.29 6.00 0.47 13.00 1.10 9.00 0Clarence Cannon WWC 2003 24 0.00 1.64 1.45 6.37 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.21 7.00 0Clarence Cannon WWC 2004 31 0.00 0.90 0.81 3.10 6.00 0.69 11.00 1.26 8.00 0Clarence Cannon WWC 2005 36 0.00 0.73 0.69 2.39 7.00 0.50 13.00 0.98 9.00 0Clarence Cannon WWC 2006 34 0.00 0.49 0.50 2.50 9.00 0.91 13.00 0.29 11.00 0Concordia Water Treatment Plant 2003 23 0.00 2.29 2.13 5.84 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.74 7.00 2Concordia Water Treatment Plant 2004 29 0.00 2.43 2.30 5.43 6.00 1.31 10.00 2.01 7.00 3Concordia Water Treatment Plant 2005 31 0.00 1.36 1.26 3.74 7.00 1.40 10.00 1.07 9.00 1Concordia Water Treatment Plant 2006 35 0.00 1.14 0.96 5.59 8.00 1.10 12.00 0.69 9.00 0Concordia Water Treatment Plant 2007 22 0.00 2.23 2.16 3.89 4.00 1.79 8.00 2.37 6.00 2Concordia Water Treatment Plant 2008 20 0.00 1.97 1.62 6.42 3.00 1.74 10.00 1.48 5.00 2Concordia Water Treatment Plant 2009 26 0.00 2.08 1.89 4.31 6.00 1.47 9.00 2.34 6.00 1Concordia Water Treatment Plant 2010 30 0.00 2.08 1.69 9.26 3.00 1.29 12.00 3.42 9.00 1Concordia Water Treatment Plant 2011 33 0.00 1.33 1.30 2.92 6.00 0.89 12.00 1.14 9.00 1Creighton Not enough
186 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

data for 2003

Creighton 2004 31 0.00 0.95 0.79 3.96 6.00 0.54 11.00 0.71 8.00 1Creighton 2005 35 0.00 0.38 0.41 0.62 7.00 0.62 13.00 0.28 9.00 0Creighton 2006 7 0.00 1.37 1.79 6.22 6.00 0.94 0.00 0.00 1.00 3Dearborn Water Treatment Plant 2003 13 0.00 2.18 2.99 5.52 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.19 2.00 5Dearborn Water Treatment Plant

Not enoughdata for 2006

Drexel 2006 25 0.00 1.15 1.16 2.15 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.39 8.00 1Drexel 2007 30 0.00 0.85 0.82 1.86 6.00 0.94 11.00 1.40 8.00 0Drexel 2008 32 0.00 0.37 0.38 0.54 7.00 0.43 12.00 0.36 8.00 0Drexel 2009 34 0.00 1.55 1.58 4.05 6.00 0.36 13.00 0.83 8.00 3Drexel 2010 31 0.00 6.33 4.42

31.85 5.00 1.40 11.00 12.48 9.00 1

Drexel 2011 4 0.00 1.83 1.65 2.05 4.00 1.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Drexel 1899 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Drexel 2010 31 0.00 6.33 4.42

31.85 5.00 1.40 11.00 12.48 9.00 1

Drexel 2011 4 0.00 1.83 1.65 2.05 4.00 1.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Hannibal Water Treatment 2003 19 0.00 0.61 0.56 1.55 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.68 7.00 0Hannibal Water Treatment 2004 31 0.00 0.70 0.61 2.63 6.00 0.31 11.00 1.18 8.00 0Hannibal Water Treatment 2005 33 0.00 0.78 0.67 4.23 7.00 0.49 13.00 1.18 6.00 0Hannibal Water Treatment 2006 4 0.00 1.66 1.64 3.46 2.00 2.31 0.00 0.00 1.00 3Hannibal Water Treatment 2008 31 0.00 0.79 0.64 6.72 6.00 0.43 13.00 1.15 7.00 0Hannibal Water Treatment 2009 5 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.35 5.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Hannibal Water Treatment Plant 2006 37 0.00 0.13 0.11 1.06 7.00 0.05 14.00 0.17 9.00 0Hannibal Water Treatment Plant 2007 31 0.00 0.57 0.51 1.49 7.00 0.45 10.00 0.64 9.00 0Harrison County PWSD #1 2006 24 0.00 1.46 1.53 2.43 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.41 9.00 1Harrison County PWSD #1 2007 29 0.00 1.52 1.49 2.28 7.00 1.66 10.00 1.56 8.00 1
187 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Harrison County PWSD #1 2008 27 0.00 0.94 1.02 1.35 1.00 1.35 13.00 1.04 8.00 0Harrison County PWSD #1 2009 34 0.00 0.74 0.74 0.99 6.00 0.82 13.00 0.76 8.00 0Harrison County PWSD #1

Not enoughdata for 2010

Jamesport Water Treatment Plant 2003 25 0.00 1.07 1.10 2.47 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.99 8.00 1Jamesport Water Treatment Plant 2004 31 0.00 0.49 0.50 1.04 6.00 0.59 11.00 0.34 8.00 0Jamesport Water Treatment Plant 2005 35 0.00 1.08 1.01 3.46 7.00 0.37 13.00 0.67 9.00 2Jamesport Water Treatment Plant 2006 40 0.00 0.67 0.64 2.25 8.00 0.48 14.00 0.66 10.00 0Jamesport Water Treatment Plant 2007 33 0.00 1.33 1.39 2.90 7.00 0.77 11.00 1.36 9.00 2Jamesport Water Treatment Plant 2008 32 0.00 0.74 0.71 2.56 6.00 1.01 13.00 0.97 8.00 0Jamesport Water Treatment Plant 2009 7 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.35 6.00 0.35 1.00 0.35 0.00 0King City 2010 19 0.00 0.70 0.76 0.85 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.84 10.00 0King City 2011 33 0.00 0.64 0.63 1.55 6.00 0.60 12.00 0.68 9.00 0LaPlata Water Treatment Plant 2004 25 0.00 2.20 2.08 2.97 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.30 8.00 2LaPlata Water Treatment Plant 2005 34 0.00 1.38 1.33 2.49 7.00 1.99 12.00 1.14 9.00 1LaPlata Water Treatment Plant 2006 14 0.00 0.85 1.11 1.58 8.00 0.90 5.00 0.41 1.00 1Marceline Water Treatment Plant 2003 24 0.00 0.48 0.72 1.39 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.78 8.00 0Marceline Water Treatment Plant 2004 30 0.00 0.46 0.49 1.08 7.00 0.63 11.00 0.59 6.00 0Marceline Water Treatment Plant 2005 32 0.00 0.36 0.38 0.53 6.00 0.46 12.00 0.29 9.00 0Marceline Water Treatment Plant 2006 36 0.00 0.10 0.09 0.46 9.00 0.11 12.00 0.06 10.00 0Marceline Water Treatment Plant 2007 28 0.00 0.54 0.54 1.09 6.00 0.54 11.00 0.58 7.00 0Marceline Water Treatment Plant 2008 31 0.00 0.47 0.47 0.80 6.00 0.64 13.00 0.44 8.00 0Marceline Water Treatment Plant 2009 30 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.66 6.00 0.37 11.00 0.35 7.00 0Marceline Water Treatment Plant 2010 31 0.00 0.55 0.50 0.94 4.00 0.37 12.00 0.63 10.00 0Marceline Water Treatment Plant 2011 31 0.00 0.52 0.50 1.40 6.00 0.45 11.00 0.58 9.00 0Maryville Water Treatment Plant 2003 21 0.00 2.68 2.74 4.01 0.00 0.00 9.00 2.38 6.00 2
188 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Maryville Water Treatment Plant 2004 31 0.00 2.13 2.25 3.17 6.00 2.56 11.00 1.69 8.00 2Maryville Water Treatment Plant 2005 34 0.00 2.72 2.63 4.75 7.00 2.09 12.00 2.51 9.00 3Maryville Water Treatment Plant 2006 42 0.00 2.91 2.80 6.44 10.00 1.97 14.00 3.30 11.00 2Maryville Water Treatment Plant 2007 33 0.00 2.94 2.90 5.92 7.00 2.78 11.00 4.01 9.00 2Maryville Water Treatment Plant 2008 28 0.00 1.94 1.91 2.91 5.00 2.11 12.00 1.61 8.00 2Maryville Water Treatment Plant 2009 33 0.00 1.63 1.57 4.81 5.00 1.85 13.00 2.10 8.00 1Maryville Water Treatment Plant 2010 33 0.00 1.86 1.72 5.33 5.00 1.03 13.00 2.07 9.00 2Maryville Water Treatment Plant 2011 34 0.00 1.57 1.64 2.26 6.00 1.56 13.00 1.33 9.00 1Maysville 2006 24 0.00 0.81 0.67 1.89 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.89 7.00 0Maysville 2007 19 0.00 0.59 0.58 1.01 3.00 0.84 6.00 0.61 4.00 0Maysville 2008 32 0.00 0.39 0.40 0.52 7.00 0.44 12.00 0.36 8.00 0Maysville 2009 34 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.44 6.00 0.36 13.00 0.37 8.00 0Maysville 2010 33 0.00 2.36 1.97

13.41 5.00 0.37 13.00 2.47 9.00 3

Maysville 2011 34 0.00 0.76 0.78 1.47 6.00 1.29 13.00 0.79 9.00 0Middle Fork Water Company 2003 6 0.00 1.23 1.15 3.31 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.26 3.00 2Middle Fork Water Company 2004 26 0.00 0.73 0.87 3.08 2.00 1.85 10.00 0.91 8.00 0Middle Fork Water Company 2005 35 0.00 1.42 1.31 4.08 7.00 0.38 13.00 1.11 9.00 2Middle Fork Water Company 2006 39 0.00 1.12 1.10 2.45 8.00 0.97 14.00 1.18 10.00 1Middle Fork Water Company 2007 33 0.00 0.67 0.68 1.47 7.00 1.13 11.00 0.60 9.00 0Middle Fork Water Company 2008 30 0.00 0.38 0.40 0.48 5.00 0.42 13.00 0.36 7.00 0Middle Fork Water Company 2009 30 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.49 5.00 0.36 11.00 0.38 8.00 0Middle Fork Water Company 2010 34 0.00 0.44 0.42 0.61 6.00 0.38 12.00 0.47 9.00 0Middle Fork Water Company 2011 35 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.46 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.40 9.00 0Monroe City‐‐Route J Lake

Not enoughdata for 2007

Monroe City‐‐S. Lake 2003 21 0.00 0.49 0.76 1.72 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.97 7.00 0
189 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Monroe City‐‐S. Lake 2004 31 0.00 0.46 0.48 1.88 6.00 1.00 11.00 0.45 8.00 0Monroe City‐‐S. Lake 2005 34 0.00 0.42 0.43 0.67 7.00 0.52 12.00 0.35 9.00 0Monroe City‐‐S. Lake 2006 41 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.83 9.00 0.07 14.00 0.15 11.00 0Monroe City‐‐S. Lake 2007 33 0.00 0.44 0.46 0.83 7.00 0.53 11.00 0.40 9.00 0Monroe City‐‐S. Lake 2008 32 0.00 0.46 0.44 2.88 6.00 0.51 13.00 0.37 9.00 0Monroe City‐‐S. Lake 2009 6 0.00 0.38 0.36 0.44 6.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Shelbina 2003 25 0.00 0.12 0.15 0.22 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.12 8.00 0Shelbina 2004 31 0.00 0.18 0.19 0.26 6.00 0.26 11.00 0.18 8.00 0Shelbina 2005 32 0.00 0.43 0.44 0.62 7.00 0.62 11.00 0.29 8.00 0Shelbina 2006 42 0.00 0.08 0.07 0.35 10.00 0.08 14.00 0.07 11.00 0Shelbina 2007 32 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.45 7.00 0.38 11.00 0.35 9.00 0Shelbina 2008 32 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.84 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.35 8.00 0Shelbina 2009 7 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.35 6.00 0.35 1.00 0.35 0.00 0Shelbina 1899 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Shelbina 2006 37 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.35 7.00 0.05 14.00 0.07 9.00 0Shelbina 2007 32 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.45 7.00 0.38 11.00 0.35 9.00 0Smithville Water Treatment Plant 2003 25 0.00 2.48 2.69 3.55 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.25 8.00 2Smithville Water Treatment Plant 2004 31 0.00 2.17 2.22 3.07 6.00 2.33 11.00 2.05 8.00 2Smithville Water Treatment Plant 2005 35 0.00 1.02 0.98 2.27 7.00 1.37 13.00 0.83 9.00 1Smithville Water Treatment Plant 2006 41 0.00 0.91 0.89 2.64 9.00 0.58 14.00 0.85 11.00 1Smithville Water Treatment Plant 2007 33 0.00 1.20 1.24 2.05 7.00 1.16 11.00 1.00 9.00 1Smithville Water Treatment Plant 2008 31 0.00 0.47 0.52 1.16 6.00 0.92 13.00 0.38 8.00 0Smithville Water Treatment Plant 2009 34 0.00 0.72 0.70 1.50 6.00 0.63 13.00 0.74 8.00 0Smithville Water Treatment Plant 2010 34 0.00 0.56 0.58 1.52 6.00 0.54 13.00 0.44 9.00 0Smithville Water Treatment Plant 2011 34 0.00 0.70 0.70 1.16 6.00 0.54 13.00 0.56 9.00 0Unionville Water Treatment Plant 2003 25 0.00 0.29 0.33 0.50 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.38 8.00 0
190 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Unionville Water Treatment Plant 2004 30 0.00 0.42 0.42 1.69 5.00 0.40 11.00 0.27 8.00 0Unionville Water Treatment Plant 2005 35 0.00 0.40 0.43 1.22 7.00 0.57 13.00 0.26 9.00 0Unionville Water Treatment Plant 2006 31 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.55 9.00 0.17 11.00 0.07 10.00 0Vandalia Water Treatment Plant 2003 21 0.00 0.61 0.55 1.35 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.71 8.00 0Vandalia Water Treatment Plant 2004 31 0.00 0.42 0.46 1.01 6.00 0.76 11.00 0.23 8.00 0Vandalia Water Treatment Plant 2005 35 0.00 0.40 0.45 0.90 7.00 0.69 13.00 0.26 9.00 0Vandalia Water Treatment Plant 2006 40 0.00 0.20 0.26 4.83 8.00 0.08 14.00 0.07 11.00 0Vandalia Water Treatment Plant 2007 29 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.81 6.00 0.53 10.00 0.42 7.00 0Vandalia Water Treatment Plant 2008 31 0.00 0.79 0.69 2.68 6.00 0.61 12.00 0.78 8.00 0Vandalia Water Treatment Plant 2009 7 0.00 1.18 0.73 2.06 6.00 1.33 1.00 0.54 0.00 0Wyaconda Water Department 2003 21 0.00 2.43 2.33 3.76 0.00 0.00 7.00 2.74 8.00 2Wyaconda Water Department 2005 43 0.00 3.93 3.66

20.29 6.00 0.33 12.00 11.04 13.00 1

Wyaconda Water Department

Not enoughdata for 2006

Wyaconda Water Department 2008 44 0.00 0.88 0.98 2.67 9.00 0.60 13.00 0.94 14.00 1Wyaconda Water Department 2009 7 0.00 0.57 0.43 0.70 7.00 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Wyaconda Water Treatment Plant 2004 31 0.00 0.74 0.75 1.39 6.00 1.03 11.00 0.85 8.00 0Wyaconda Water Treatment Plant 2006 55 0.00 0.56 0.55 1.63 14.00 0.98 14.00 0.46 14.00 0Wyaconda Water Treatment Plant 2007 47 0.00 0.78 0.79 1.23 13.00 0.74 12.00 0.65 9.00 0Johnston County Utilities Department 2006 14 0.00 0.08 0.13 0.42 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.12 6.00 0Johnston County Utilities Department 2007 32 0.00 0.51 0.47 0.92 11.00 0.66 10.00 0.47 5.00 0Johnston County Utilities Department 2008 33 0.00 0.54 0.51 1.10 12.00 0.72 11.00 0.51 6.00 0Johnston County Utilities Department 2009 35 0.00 0.43 0.42 0.62 11.00 0.47 11.00 0.46 6.00 0Johnston County Utilities Department 2010 39 0.00 0.42 0.41 0.83 8.00 0.44 11.00 0.40 8.00 0Johnston County Utilities Department 2011 34 0.00 0.46 0.48 0.93 10.00 0.47 11.00 0.41 7.00 0Monroe‐‐John Glenn

Not enoughdata for 2003
191 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2004 31 0.00 0.54 0.56 0.98 6.00 0.74 11.00 0.43 8.00 0Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2005 33 0.00 1.54 1.33 3.63 5.00 0.49 13.00 1.85 9.00 1Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2006 39 0.00 0.79 0.93

13.20 8.00 0.79 14.00 0.43 10.00 0

Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2007 31 0.00 1.33 1.32 2.33 7.00 0.85 10.00 1.77 8.00 1Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2008 27 0.00 1.82 1.83 3.63 6.00 1.39 11.00 2.14 6.00 2Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2009 32 0.00 0.95 0.96 1.54 6.00 0.98 12.00 0.84 8.00 1Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2010 31 0.00 0.49 0.47 0.85 3.00 0.47 12.00 0.51 10.00 0Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2011 35 0.00 0.83 0.81 1.36 6.00 0.39 13.00 0.71 10.00 1South Granville 2008 22 0.00 0.49 0.53 0.64 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.59 8.00 0South Granville 2009 34 0.00 0.37 0.38 0.45 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.35 8.00 0South Granville 2010 34 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.45 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.38 9.00 0South Granville 2011 34 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.74 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.40 9.00 0Alliance Water Treatment Plant 2003 24 0.00 1.06 0.98 2.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.94 8.00 1Alliance Water Treatment Plant 2004 31 0.00 0.79 0.82 1.84 6.00 0.51 11.00 0.47 8.00 1Alliance Water Treatment Plant 2005 32 0.00 0.50 0.49 0.86 4.00 0.37 13.00 0.40 9.00 0Alliance Water Treatment Plant 2006 38 0.00 0.37 0.40 1.19 9.00 0.18 13.00 0.23 9.00 0Alliance Water Treatment Plant 2007 33 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.69 7.00 0.41 11.00 0.50 9.00 0Alliance Water Treatment Plant 2008 29 0.00 0.38 0.37 0.47 6.00 0.35 10.00 0.37 8.00 0Alliance Water Treatment Plant 2009 7 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.38 6.00 0.35 1.00 0.35 0.00 0Blanchester

Not enoughdata for 2003

Blanchester 2004 31 0.00 1.89 1.66

16.90 6.00 0.50 11.00 1.87 8.00 2

Blanchester 2005 34 0.00 8.09 5.80

42.74 6.00 0.67 13.00 17.55 9.00 3

Blanchester 2006 39 0.00 1.65 1.44

18.82 8.00 0.55 14.00 2.06 10.00 2

Blanchester 2007 33 0.00 0.96 1.05 3.28 7.00 0.48 11.00 0.53 9.00 1
192 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Blanchester 2008 32 0.00 4.29 4.26

11.02 6.00 8.08 13.00 5.47 8.00 1

Blanchester 2009 34 0.00 4.25 3.93

11.26 6.00 6.43 13.00 6.45 8.00 2

Blanchester 2010 34 0.00 2.71 2.19

16.42 6.00 0.81 13.00 5.16 9.00 1

Blanchester 2011 34 0.00 0.65 0.67 1.19 6.00 0.73 13.00 0.42 9.00 0Bowling Green Water Treatment 2003 21 0.00 0.51 0.46 1.01 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.63 7.00 0Bowling Green Water Treatment

Not enoughdata for 2006

Bowling Green Water Treatment Plant 2004 31 0.00 0.34 0.35 0.55 6.00 0.36 11.00 0.31 8.00 0Bowling Green Water Treatment Plant 2005 35 0.00 0.40 0.41 0.66 7.00 0.42 13.00 0.33 9.00 0Bowling Green Water Treatment Plant 2006 39 0.00 0.18 0.17 0.56 8.00 0.11 14.00 0.19 10.00 0Bowling Green Water Treatment Plant 2007 33 0.00 0.61 0.61 0.93 7.00 0.42 11.00 0.58 9.00 0Bowling Green Water Treatment Plant 2008 30 0.00 0.54 0.53 1.20 5.00 0.42 13.00 0.55 8.00 0Bowling Green Water Treatment Plant 2009 7 0.00 0.47 0.50 0.54 6.00 0.46 1.00 0.51 0.00 0Cinnamon Lake Utility Co. 2003 19 0.00 2.15 1.79 2.95 0.00 0.00 5.00 1.34 8.00 2Cinnamon Lake Utility Co. 2004 31 0.00 2.12 2.28 4.64 6.00 1.50 11.00 0.83 8.00 3Cinnamon Lake Utility Co. 2005 35 0.00 1.11 1.12 2.63 7.00 1.40 13.00 0.85 9.00 1Cinnamon Lake Utility Co. 2006 40 0.00 1.33 1.45 3.73 9.00 0.53 14.00 0.73 10.00 2Cinnamon Lake Utility Co. 2007 31 0.00 1.00 1.02 2.19 6.00 1.45 11.00 0.88 8.00 0Cinnamon Lake Utility Co. 2008 31 0.00 0.65 0.72 1.28 6.00 0.57 13.00 0.40 7.00 0Cinnamon Lake Utility Co.

Not enoughdata for 2009

City of Defiance 2003 25 0.00 1.13 0.73 4.90 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.79 8.00 0City of Defiance 2004 31 0.00 1.58 1.70

14.91 6.00 0.37 11.00 4.95 8.00 1

City of Defiance 2005 34 0.00 1.74 1.34 9.53 7.00 0.38 12.00 3.29 9.00 1City of Defiance 2006 40 0.00 2.17 2.02

22.78 9.00 1.11 14.00 4.48 12.00 0

City of Defiance 2007 32 0.00 1.24 1.00 5.74 7.00 0.44 11.00 2.01 9.00 0
193 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

City of Defiance 2008 29 0.00 1.60 1.37

12.37 4.00 0.36 13.00 1.68 8.00 2

City of Defiance 2009 34 0.00 1.04 1.04 2.33 6.00 0.68 13.00 0.74 8.00 1City of Defiance 2010 34 0.00 1.22 1.09 2.96 6.00 0.58 13.00 1.48 9.00 1City of Defiance 2011 34 0.00 0.58 0.58 1.11 6.00 0.46 13.00 0.46 9.00 0City of Lima 2003 25 0.00 1.18 1.05 2.25 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.06 8.00 1City of Lima 2004 31 0.00 0.88 0.91 1.42 6.00 1.13 11.00 0.68 8.00 0City of Lima 2005 35 0.00 0.87 0.81 2.12 7.00 0.53 13.00 0.73 9.00 1City of Lima 2006 40 0.00 0.77 0.80 2.75 9.00 0.32 14.00 0.88 11.00 0City of Lima 2007 31 0.00 1.23 1.20 1.91 7.00 1.31 11.00 1.29 7.00 1City of Lima 2008 33 0.00 1.13 1.22 2.24 7.00 0.80 13.00 0.87 8.00 1City of Lima 2009 7 0.00 1.10 0.91 1.46 6.00 1.18 1.00 0.82 0.00 0City of Shelby‐‐Reservoir 2 2003 20 0.00 0.77 0.71 1.19 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.72 7.00 0City of Shelby‐‐Reservoir 2 2004 31 0.00 0.98 1.15 3.36 6.00 0.62 11.00 0.82 8.00 1City of Shelby‐‐Reservoir 2 2005 33 0.00 1.02 0.94 4.15 6.00 0.73 12.00 1.03 9.00 1City of Shelby‐‐Reservoir 2 2006 36 0.00 0.94 0.89 3.69 8.00 0.63 12.00 0.68 10.00 1City of Shelby‐‐Reservoir 2 2007 33 0.00 0.51 0.53 0.82 7.00 0.52 11.00 0.47 9.00 0City of Shelby‐‐Reservoir 2 2008 32 0.00 0.54 0.55 1.42 6.00 0.50 13.00 0.45 8.00 0City of Shelby‐‐Reservoir 2 2009 33 0.00 0.44 0.45 1.10 6.00 0.47 12.00 0.42 8.00 0City of Shelby‐‐Reservoir 2 2010 34 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.82 6.00 0.39 13.00 0.46 9.00 0City of Shelby‐‐Reservoir 2 2011 34 0.00 0.54 0.50 5.24 6.00 0.45 13.00 0.76 9.00 0Clermont Co. Water

Not enoughdata for 2003

Clermont Co. Water 2004 31 0.00 0.42 0.49 1.76 6.00 1.13 11.00 0.30 8.00 0Clermont Co. Water 2005 35 0.00 1.28 1.15 3.24 7.00 0.46 13.00 1.49 9.00 1Clermont Co. Water 2006 39 0.00 0.58 0.57 2.18 8.00 1.36 14.00 0.56 10.00 0Clermont Co. Water 2007 32 0.00 0.42 0.42 0.54 6.00 0.44 11.00 0.39 9.00 0
194 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Clermont Co. Water 2008 32 0.00 0.74 0.62 2.73 7.00 0.58 13.00 1.15 8.00 0Clermont Co. Water 2009 33 0.00 0.48 0.47 1.09 6.00 0.44 12.00 0.53 8.00 0Clermont Co. Water 2010 34 0.00 1.12 0.94 6.83 6.00 0.91 13.00 1.99 9.00 0Clermont Co. Water 2011 34 0.00 0.55 0.55 1.55 6.00 0.51 13.00 0.55 9.00 0Delaware Water Plant 2003 25 0.00 1.61 1.10 9.04 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.37 8.00 1Delaware Water Plant 2004 30 0.00 1.55 1.64 8.45 6.00 0.31 11.00 3.18 8.00 1Delaware Water Plant 2005 35 0.00 1.73 1.39

21.46 7.00 0.48 13.00 3.12 9.00 1

Delaware Water Plant 2006 40 0.00 0.72 0.58 3.65 9.00 0.35 14.00 1.16 11.00 0Delaware Water Plant 2007 33 0.00 1.08 1.00 5.41 7.00 0.41 11.00 1.97 9.00 0Delaware Water Plant 2008 32 0.00 1.16 1.03 4.41 6.00 0.42 13.00 1.66 8.00 1Delaware Water Plant 2009 34 0.00 0.88 0.83 4.42 6.00 0.51 13.00 1.08 8.00 1Delaware Water Plant 2010 34 0.00 0.84 0.82 3.57 6.00 0.50 13.00 1.06 9.00 0Delaware Water Plant 2011 34 0.00 1.04 0.93 6.29 6.00 0.58 13.00 1.56 9.00 0Lake of the Woods Water Company

Not enoughdata for 2003

Lake of the Woods Water Company 2004 30 0.00 1.63 1.55 5.51 6.00 0.48 11.00 1.88 7.00 2Lake of the Woods Water Company 2005 34 0.00 1.52 1.49 5.53 7.00 0.48 12.00 1.52 9.00 2Lake of the Woods Water Company 2006 37 0.00 1.33 1.25 3.85 9.00 1.00 14.00 1.19 9.00 2Lake of the Woods Water Company 2007 32 0.00 0.64 0.67 1.33 6.00 0.86 11.00 0.45 9.00 0Lake of the Woods Water Company 2008 24 0.00 2.01 1.68 6.42 5.00 1.05 11.00 2.44 8.00 1Mc Clure Water Treatment Plant 2005 23 0.00 1.72 1.06 8.56 4.00 0.34 9.00 2.07 7.00 1Mc Clure Water Treatment Plant

Not enoughdata for 2006

McClure Water Treatment Plant 2003 10 0.00 1.86 1.85

10.31 0.00 0.00 4.00 5.11 4.00 1

McClure Water Treatment Plant 2004 24 0.00 1.71 1.75

13.27 3.00 0.30 10.00 5.42 8.00 0

McClure Water Treatment Plant 2006 33 0.00 2.11 1.91

17.35 7.00 0.05 13.00 5.16 10.00 0
195 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

McClure Water Treatment Plant 2007 26 0.00 2.62 1.68 8.55 5.00 0.41 6.00 3.02 9.00 2McClure Water Treatment Plant 2008 31 0.00 3.94 2.69

40.39 7.00 0.47 12.00 7.61 8.00 1

McClure Water Treatment Plant 2009 34 0.00 2.69 1.99

22.77 6.00 0.46 13.00 5.30 8.00 1

McClure Water Treatment Plant 2010 34 0.00 2.55 1.96

14.03 6.00 0.42 13.00 5.20 9.00 1

McClure Water Treatment Plant 2011 34 0.00 1.83 1.43 9.95 6.00 0.47 13.00 2.54 9.00 2Monroeville

Not enoughdata for 2003

Monroeville 2004 31 0.00 0.22 0.23 0.53 6.00 0.27 11.00 0.19 8.00 0Monroeville 2005 35 0.00 0.40 0.41 0.62 7.00 0.49 13.00 0.37 9.00 0Monroeville 2006 39 0.00 0.10 0.11 0.85 8.00 0.10 14.00 0.06 10.00 0Monroeville 2007 31 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.53 7.00 0.42 11.00 0.36 7.00 0Monroeville 2008 31 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.38 6.00 0.35 12.00 0.35 8.00 0Monroeville 2009 31 0.00 0.36 0.37 0.51 5.00 0.35 13.00 0.35 7.00 0Monroeville 2010 30 0.00 0.43 0.45 0.62 5.00 0.49 13.00 0.44 7.00 0Monroeville 2011 34 0.00 0.41 0.41 1.15 6.00 0.38 13.00 0.40 9.00 0Monroeville‐ West Branch Huron

Not enoughdata for 2007

Mt. Orab 2003 24 0.00 0.88 0.93 1.57 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.82 8.00 0Mt. Orab 2004 29 0.00 0.58 0.60 0.99 6.00 0.85 9.00 0.50 8.00 0Mt. Orab 2005 31 0.00 0.39 0.40 0.59 7.00 0.51 11.00 0.30 8.00 0Mt. Orab 2006 44 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.54 10.00 0.17 15.00 0.06 11.00 0Mt. Orab 2007 33 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.45 7.00 0.38 11.00 0.35 9.00 0Mt. Orab 2008 31 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.35 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.35 8.00 0Mt. Orab 2009 15 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.35 6.00 0.35 9.00 0.35 0.00 0Mt. Orab 1899 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Mt. Orab

Not enoughdata for 2006
196 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Mt. Orab 2007 33 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.45 7.00 0.38 11.00 0.35 9.00 0Napoleon

Not enoughdata for 2003

Napoleon 2004 31 0.00 1.49 1.43 9.37 6.00 0.44 11.00 3.99 8.00 0Napoleon 2005 35 0.00 1.38 1.10 4.55 7.00 0.47 13.00 2.00 9.00 1Napoleon 2006 39 0.00 1.82 1.44

10.19 8.00 0.36 14.00 3.59 10.00 0

Napoleon 2007 33 0.00 1.68 1.37 6.28 7.00 0.43 11.00 2.89 9.00 1Napoleon 2008 32 0.00 2.12 1.57

12.96 6.00 0.72 13.00 3.93 8.00 1

Napoleon 2009 34 0.00 2.14 1.59

15.07 6.00 0.43 13.00 4.13 8.00 1

Napoleon 2010 34 0.00 2.30 1.74

11.65 6.00 0.41 13.00 4.60 9.00 1

Napoleon 2011 34 0.00 1.69 1.35

10.61 6.00 0.47 13.00 2.31 9.00 1

New Washington Water Plant 2003 24 0.00 1.18 0.97 2.71 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.13 9.00 1New Washington Water Plant 2004 31 0.00 1.05 1.20 4.64 6.00 1.06 11.00 0.47 8.00 1New Washington Water Plant 2005 34 0.00 1.10 0.98 3.36 7.00 1.14 12.00 1.23 9.00 1New Washington Water Plant 2006 38 0.00 0.48 0.56 3.17 9.00 0.20 14.00 0.25 10.00 1New Washington Water Plant 2007 27 0.00 0.96 0.97 1.86 4.00 0.57 10.00 0.89 9.00 1New Washington Water Plant 2008 28 0.00 0.57 0.58 0.83 5.00 0.63 13.00 0.54 5.00 0New Washington Water Plant 2009 4 0.00 0.42 0.39 0.45 4.00 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Newark Water Works 2004 28 0.00 0.70 0.56 5.33 3.00 0.26 11.00 1.36 8.00 0Newark Water Works 2005 35 0.00 0.67 0.56 8.46 7.00 0.51 13.00 0.99 9.00 0Newark Water Works 2006 39 0.00 0.37 0.34 2.42 8.00 0.41 14.00 0.57 10.00 0Newark Water Works 2007 32 0.00 0.48 0.45 2.04 7.00 0.41 11.00 0.65 9.00 0Newark Water Works 2008 32 0.00 0.81 0.64 7.46 7.00 0.36 12.00 1.41 8.00 0Newark Water Works 2009 33 0.00 0.52 0.47 2.34 5.00 0.41 13.00 0.70 8.00 0Newark Water Works 2010 34 0.00 0.45 0.44 0.94 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.54 9.00 0
197 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Newark Water Works 2011 140 0.00 0.87 0.60

10.58 6.00 0.47 91.00 1.11 37.00 0

Newark Water Works, Newark

Not enoughdata for 2007

Norwalk Water Treatment Plant 2003 23 0.00 0.75 0.60 2.52 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.38 7.00 0Norwalk Water Treatment Plant 2004 30 0.00 0.87 0.92 3.34 6.00 2.01 11.00 0.70 7.00 0Norwalk Water Treatment Plant 2005 33 0.00 0.45 0.53 1.33 6.00 0.94 13.00 0.23 8.00 0Norwalk Water Treatment Plant 2006 41 0.00 0.16 0.15 0.55 9.00 0.16 14.00 0.07 11.00 0Norwalk Water Treatment Plant 2007 32 0.00 0.61 0.65 1.28 7.00 0.61 11.00 0.43 8.00 0Norwalk Water Treatment Plant 2008 31 0.00 0.42 0.48 0.70 6.00 0.55 13.00 0.35 8.00 0Norwalk Water Treatment Plant 2009 7 0.00 0.47 0.42 0.60 6.00 0.50 1.00 0.39 0.00 0Piqua Reservoir 2003 19 0.00 1.96 5.37

12.30 0.00 0.00 6.00 8.34 7.00 0

Piqua Reservoir 2004 31 0.00 1.30 1.22 5.99 6.00 0.30 11.00 2.71 8.00 1Piqua Reservoir 2006 4 0.00 4.07 4.46 5.92 2.00 3.74 0.00 0.00 2.00 4Piqua Reservoir 1899 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Piqua Reservoir 2004 31 0.00 1.30 1.22 5.99 6.00 0.30 11.00 2.71 8.00 1Piqua Reservoir

Not enoughdata for 2006

Piqua‐‐Swift Lake 2005 34 0.00 3.80 2.69

65.20 6.00 0.47 13.00 8.89 9.00 0

Piqua‐‐Swift Lake 2006 36 0.00 1.35 1.21 7.41 7.00 0.37 13.00 1.74 9.00 0Piqua‐‐Swift Lake 2007 33 0.00 1.74 1.55 5.76 7.00 0.92 11.00 2.37 9.00 1Piqua‐‐Swift Lake 2008 33 0.00 4.24 3.02

48.92 7.00 1.57 13.00 8.29 8.00 1

Piqua‐‐Swift Lake 2009 34 0.00 0.96 0.95 2.31 6.00 1.54 13.00 1.11 8.00 0Piqua‐‐Swift Lake 2010 34 0.00 1.39 1.26 9.05 6.00 1.32 13.00 2.22 9.00 0Piqua‐‐Swift Lake 2011 34 0.00 1.93 1.60

13.91 6.00 1.45 13.00 3.51 9.00 0

Upper Sandusky City Hall 2003 18 0.00 1.26 1.18 3.16 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.93 6.00 1Upper Sandusky City Hall 2004 29 0.00 0.87 0.87 1.88 5.00 0.62 11.00 0.81 8.00 1
198 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Upper Sandusky City Hall 2005 35 0.00 1.34 1.28 2.64 7.00 1.28 13.00 1.39 9.00 1Upper Sandusky City Hall 2006 34 0.00 0.40 0.36 1.96 8.00 0.59 11.00 0.33 7.00 0Upper Sandusky City Hall 2007 29 0.00 0.76 0.79 1.59 4.00 0.84 10.00 0.66 9.00 0Upper Sandusky City Hall 2008 27 0.00 0.77 0.83 1.24 6.00 0.96 12.00 0.73 7.00 0Upper Sandusky City Hall 2009 4 0.00 0.80 0.86 0.88 4.00 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Village of Ottawa 2003 25 0.00 0.96 0.83 2.02 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.85 8.00 1Village of Ottawa 2004 31 0.00 0.55 0.61 1.46 6.00 0.62 11.00 0.33 8.00 0Village of Ottawa 2005 35 0.00 0.64 0.69 2.09 7.00 0.51 13.00 0.45 9.00 1Village of Ottawa 2006 40 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.54 9.00 0.11 14.00 0.12 10.00 0Village of Ottawa 2007 33 0.00 0.50 0.51 0.70 7.00 0.46 11.00 0.46 9.00 0Village of Ottawa 2008 29 0.00 0.63 0.66 1.24 6.00 0.43 13.00 0.54 5.00 1Village of Ottawa 2009 32 0.00 0.84 0.80 2.50 6.00 0.43 12.00 0.79 7.00 1Village of Ottawa 2010 30 0.00 1.18 1.01 2.81 5.00 0.57 13.00 1.22 7.00 1Village of Ottawa 2011 34 0.00 1.01 0.98 2.66 6.00 0.56 13.00 0.71 9.00 1Waynoka Regional Water 2003 11 0.00 0.54 0.49 0.75 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.51 7.00 0Waynoka Regional Water 2004 20 0.00 2.98 2.52

10.67 3.00 0.43 6.00 0.26 5.00 6

Waynoka Regional Water 2005 36 0.00 1.63 1.57 3.52 7.00 1.94 13.00 1.88 9.00 1Waynoka Regional Water 2006 40 0.00 0.45 0.47 0.83 8.00 0.52 14.00 0.38 11.00 0Waynoka Regional Water 2007 33 0.00 0.61 0.61 0.82 7.00 0.73 11.00 0.61 9.00 0Waynoka Regional Water 2008 32 0.00 0.42 0.43 0.80 7.00 0.65 13.00 0.38 8.00 0Waynoka Regional Water 2009 33 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.35 5.00 0.35 13.00 0.35 8.00 0Waynoka Regional Water 2010 32 0.00 0.40 0.41 1.29 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.38 8.00 0Waynoka Regional Water 2011 34 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.37 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.37 9.00 0Wilmington

Not enoughdata for 2003

Wilmington 2004 31 0.00 0.91 0.92 1.79 6.00 0.65 11.00 0.88 8.00 0
199 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Wilmington 2005 31 0.00 1.01 0.97 3.05 6.00 0.67 11.00 1.25 8.00 1Wilmington 2006 39 0.00 0.60 0.60 1.89 8.00 0.55 14.00 0.38 9.00 0Wilmington 2007 31 0.00 0.51 0.52 1.07 7.00 0.82 11.00 0.42 9.00 0Wilmington 2008 33 0.00 0.75 0.72 1.71 7.00 0.49 13.00 0.89 8.00 0Wilmington 2009 32 0.00 0.77 0.78 1.11 6.00 0.90 12.00 0.80 8.00 0Wilmington 2010 33 0.00 0.77 0.77 1.24 6.00 0.91 12.00 0.79 9.00 0Wilmington 2011 33 0.00 0.78 0.81 1.95 6.00 1.01 12.00 0.60 9.00 0Polk Center 2008 21 0.00 2.67 2.36

33.91 0.00 0.00 8.00 5.57 5.00 0

Polk Center 2009 35 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.66 6.00 0.35 12.00 0.40 6.00 0Polk Center 2010 38 0.00 0.99 0.83 7.21 6.00 0.37 13.00 2.20 6.00 0Polk Center 2011 40 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.84 7.00 0.37 13.00 0.41 7.00 0Aquilla Water Supply District 2003 23 0.00 1.81 2.04 2.85 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.64 7.00 1Aquilla Water Supply District 2004 31 0.00 1.20 1.12 3.01 9.00 1.67 11.00 1.25 6.00 0Aquilla Water Supply District 2005 33 0.00 0.94 0.91 2.02 8.00 0.37 13.00 1.20 6.00 1Aquilla Water Supply District 2006 30 0.00 0.93 0.84 2.69 11.00 0.96 10.00 1.24 8.00 0Brazosport Water Authority 2003 22 0.00 0.64 0.89 2.03 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.99 5.00 0Brazosport Water Authority 2004 32 0.00 0.67 0.63 1.45 8.00 0.86 11.00 0.95 7.00 0Brazosport Water Authority 2005 36 0.00 0.90 0.79 2.74 8.00 0.94 13.00 1.18 9.00 0Brazosport Water Authority 2006 39 0.00 0.26 0.25 1.00 11.00 0.24 13.00 0.38 9.00 0Brazosport Water Authority 2007 27 0.00 1.32 0.96

10.32 9.00 1.10 10.00 1.09 5.00 0

Brazosport Water Authority 2008 25 0.00 1.19 0.84 4.75 7.00 0.84 12.00 1.60 4.00 0Brazosport Water Authority 2009 32 0.00 1.09 0.90 4.97 9.00 0.60 10.00 1.85 6.00 0Brazosport Water Authority 2010 32 0.00 0.66 0.59 1.89 7.00 0.50 12.00 0.94 9.00 0Brazosport Water Authority 2011 35 0.00 0.67 0.66 2.99 9.00 1.15 13.00 0.58 7.00 0Cameron 2006 17 0.00 0.20 0.42 0.70 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.57 6.00 0
200 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Cameron 2007 31 0.00 1.23 1.04 7.15 8.00 2.16 11.00 1.15 6.00 0Cameron 2008 27 0.00 0.67 0.61 2.13 6.00 0.57 11.00 0.98 5.00 0Cameron 2009 30 0.00 0.76 0.62 2.05 9.00 0.55 10.00 1.07 6.00 0Cameron 2010 29 0.00 0.63 0.60 2.32 6.00 0.63 11.00 0.81 7.00 0Cameron 2011 35 0.00 0.54 0.51 1.65 8.00 0.49 14.00 0.67 7.00 0Cameron 1899 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Cameron 2009 30 0.00 0.76 0.62 2.05 9.00 0.55 10.00 1.07 6.00 0City of Ennis 2003 21 0.00 1.14 1.21 1.55 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.15 6.00 1City of Ennis 2004 32 0.00 1.33 1.36 2.77 9.00 1.10 11.00 1.77 6.00 1City of Ennis 2005 36 0.00 0.64 0.63 1.19 9.00 0.65 14.00 0.74 7.00 0City of Ennis 2006 40 0.00 0.44 0.38 2.27 11.00 0.50 14.00 0.54 8.00 0City of Ennis 2007 32 0.00 0.82 0.73 2.21 9.00 0.71 11.00 1.21 6.00 0City of Ennis 2008 33 0.00 0.82 0.82 1.32 10.00 0.53 13.00 0.98 5.00 0City of Ennis 2009 10 0.00 1.18 1.42 1.54 9.00 1.06 1.00 1.54 0.00 0City of Taylor 2003 23 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.39 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.19 7.00 0City of Taylor 2004 31 0.00 0.50 0.41 2.35 9.00 0.38 11.00 0.90 6.00 0City of Taylor 2005 36 0.00 0.48 0.49 1.44 10.00 0.72 13.00 0.38 7.00 0City of Taylor 2006 38 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.42 11.00 0.07 13.00 0.20 8.00 0City of Taylor 2007 31 0.00 0.59 0.60 2.28 8.00 1.34 11.00 0.37 6.00 0City of Taylor 2008 30 0.00 0.48 0.44 1.37 8.00 0.41 12.00 0.58 6.00 0City of Taylor 2009 32 0.00 0.47 0.46 1.18 7.00 0.55 13.00 0.56 6.00 0City of Taylor 2010 35 0.00 0.49 0.48 0.89 8.00 0.40 13.00 0.53 7.00 0City of Taylor 2011 33 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.47 8.00 0.38 12.00 0.42 7.00 0Cooper Water Treatment Plant 2003 12 0.00 0.33 0.30 0.46 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.24 5.00 0Cooper Water Treatment Plant 2004 29 0.00 0.22 0.23 0.41 8.00 0.33 10.00 0.22 5.00 0Cooper Water Treatment Plant 2005 32 0.00 1.95 1.80 4.33 8.00 0.52 12.00 2.92 5.00 2
201 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Cooper Water Treatment Plant 2006 38 0.00 0.64 0.57 4.28 12.00 1.08 13.00 0.44 5.00 0Cooper Water Treatment Plant 2007 24 0.00 1.70 1.50 2.85 7.00 1.86 8.00 2.57 6.00 0Cooper Water Treatment Plant 2008 27 0.00 1.75 1.45 3.35 6.00 1.01 12.00 2.13 6.00 1Cooper Water Treatment Plant 2009 31 0.00 1.12 1.09 3.25 8.00 1.00 10.00 1.69 6.00 1Cooper Water Treatment Plant 2010 31 0.00 2.05 1.67 4.81 6.00 0.47 12.00 3.17 8.00 1Cooper Water Treatment Plant 2011 31 0.00 0.69 0.69 1.17 7.00 1.06 12.00 0.68 7.00 0Corsicanna 2003 23 0.00 0.96 1.04 1.35 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.94 6.00 1Corsicanna 2004 32 0.00 2.50 2.33 5.07 9.00 2.89 11.00 2.48 6.00 2Corsicanna 2005 35 0.00 1.90 1.76 4.26 9.00 2.68 13.00 2.04 7.00 1Corsicanna 2006 33 0.00 1.04 1.05 2.83 11.00 1.04 13.00 1.08 8.00 0Crosby 2008 19 0.00 1.34 0.91 2.25 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.10 6.00 1Crosby 2009 35 0.00 1.38 1.17 6.87 9.00 1.30 13.00 1.84 6.00 0Crosby 2010 34 0.00 1.42 1.24 3.81 8.00 0.66 13.00 2.20 7.00 1Crosby 2011 29 0.00 1.23 1.14 1.98 8.00 0.76 13.00 1.41 7.00 1Crosby 1899 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Crosby 2009 35 0.00 1.38 1.17 6.87 9.00 1.30 13.00 1.84 6.00 0Crosby‐‐Gulf Aquifer 2011 5 0.00 0.84 0.46 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Marlin Water Treatment Plant 2003 16 0.00 1.49 2.63 5.64 0.00 0.00 8.00 2.94 5.00 1Marlin Water Treatment Plant 2004 33 0.00 0.37 0.35 0.71 9.00 0.57 11.00 0.46 7.00 0Marlin Water Treatment Plant 2005 35 0.00 2.27 1.97 4.55 9.00 1.77 13.00 3.09 7.00 2Marlin Water Treatment Plant 2006 32 0.00 0.20 0.17 0.58 10.00 0.37 13.00 0.15 8.00 0Midlothian Water Treatment Plant 2003 22 0.00 1.34 1.31 1.64 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.22 6.00 1Midlothian Water Treatment Plant 2004 32 0.00 1.81 1.75 3.54 9.00 1.93 11.00 2.28 6.00 1Midlothian Water Treatment Plant 2005 35 0.00 1.81 1.73 3.94 9.00 1.08 13.00 2.27 7.00 2Midlothian Water Treatment Plant 2006 40 0.00 0.92 0.91 2.59 11.00 1.24 14.00 0.86 8.00 0Midlothian Water Treatment Plant 2007 33 0.00 1.58 1.50 2.68 9.00 1.12 11.00 2.16 7.00 1
202 

Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for TCT Concentration in Finished Water Samples at AMP Monitoring Sites (Me

Site ID Status n

Number

of Non‐

detects

Arit

Ave

Annual

Ave Max

# 1st

Qtr

90‐d

avg

1st

Qtr

# 2nd

Qtr

90‐d

avg

2nd

Qtr

# 3rd

Qtr

Midlothian Water Treatment Plant 2008 33 0.00 1.74 1.66 3.77 9.00 1.23 13.00 2.18 6.00 1Midlothian Water Treatment Plant 2009 10 0.00 1.70 1.80 2.72 9.00 1.56 1.00 1.90 0.00 0Waterwood 2010 12 0.00 0.53 0.67 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0Waterwood 2011 34 0.00 0.48 0.47 0.99 8.00 0.39 13.00 0.54 7.00 0Waterwood 1899 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0Waterwood 2010 12 0.00 0.53 0.67 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0Waxahachie Water Treatment Plant 2003 18 0.00 1.12 1.03 1.57 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.87 6.00 1Waxahachie Water Treatment Plant 2004 32 0.00 1.10 1.07 2.71 9.00 1.45 11.00 1.41 6.00 0Waxahachie Water Treatment Plant 2005 36 0.00 0.41 0.42 0.63 8.00 0.35 13.00 0.35 9.00 0Waxahachie Water Treatment Plant 2006 39 0.00 0.64 0.61 1.62 11.00 0.39 14.00 0.86 7.00 0Waxahachie Water Treatment Plant 2007 28 0.00 1.05 0.94 2.03 9.00 0.73 11.00 1.58 5.00 0Waxahachie Water Treatment Plant 2008 25 0.00 1.59 1.41 2.26 4.00 0.74 13.00 1.82 4.00 1Waxahachie Water Treatment Plant 2009 24 0.00 1.44 1.33 1.96 9.00 1.45 7.00 1.47 7.00 1Waxahachie Water Treatment Plant 2010 23 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.70 6.00 0.66 8.00 0.59 5.00 0Waxahachie Water Treatment Plant 2011 22 0.00 0.60 0.59 0.73 1.00 0.60 7.00 0.58 7.00 0
203 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Stockton East Water

District 2007 25 0 0.35 0.35 0.46 3.00 0.35 6.00 0.35 6.00 0.35 

Stockton East Water

District‐‐NewMelones Reservoir 2007 14 0 0.36 0.35 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.35 

Sumner Hills 2007 28 0 0.35 0.35 0.35 3.00 0.35 6.00 0.35 7.00 0.35 Belle Glade 2007 38 0 0.60 0.56 1.55 8.00 0.49 11.00 0.55 8.00 0.69 Lee County Utilities 2007 37 0 0.58 0.64 1.69 8.00 0.45 11.00 0.62 7.00 0.86 Peace River RegionalWater 2007 37 0 0.39 0.41 0.75 8.00 0.40 10.00 0.47 8.00 0.42 Punta Gorda 2007 37 0 0.39 0.40 0.92 8.00 0.40 11.00 0.41 8.00 0.40 Centerville Municipal

Water Works 2003 25 0 5.24 5.29 15.22 0.00 0.00 12.00 4.52 7.00 9.00 

Centerville Municipal

Water Works 2004 33 0 2.08 2.09 4.73 6.00 2.90 13.00 1.94 8.00 1.88 

Centerville Municipal

Water Works 2005 35 0 1.64 1.67 3.40 7.00 1.46 13.00 1.10 9.00 2.57 

Centerville Municipal

Water Works 2006 14 0 1.41 1.63 2.32 7.00 1.57 7.00 1.47 0.00 0.00 

Chariton Municipal

Water Works 2003 25 0 2.94 3.07 5.20 0.00 0.00 12.00 2.39 7.00 3.66 

Chariton Municipal

Water Works 2004 33 0 2.58 2.71 4.55 6.00 2.52 13.00 1.80 8.00 3.59 

Chariton Municipal

Water Works 2005 35 0 1.77 1.76 3.88 7.00 2.47 13.00 1.70 9.00 1.96 

Chariton Municipal

Water Works 2006 33 0 0.88 0.88 1.51 6.00 0.98 13.00 0.77 9.00 1.15 

Chariton Municipal

Water Works 2007 31 0 1.26 1.35 2.17 7.00 0.86 12.00 1.08 9.00 1.68 

Chariton Municipal

Water Works 2008 32 0 2.27 2.08 6.58 6.00 1.26 13.00 1.98 8.00 3.48 
204 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Chariton Municipal

Water Works 2009 8 0 0.97 0.99 1.36 6.00 1.00 1.00 0.59 1.00 1.04 

Creston 2007 34 0 2.24 2.19 4.64 7.00 1.53 13.00 2.16 9.00 3.08 Creston 2010 33 0 1.87 1.84 4.53 6.00 1.16 13.00 1.41 9.00 2.76 Creston‐‐ 12 MileLake 2003 23 0 2.97 2.71 3.91 0.00 0.00 8.00 2.06 9.00 3.22 Creston‐‐ 12 MileLake 2004 33 0 2.39 2.39 3.72 6.00 2.83 13.00 2.13 8.00 2.65 Creston‐‐ 12 MileLake 2005 20 0 2.19 2.97 3.74 7.00 2.24 13.00 2.16 0.00 0.00 Creston‐‐ 12 MileLake

Not enough

data for2008

Creston‐‐ 3 Mile Lake 2003 24 0 2.79 2.56 4.42 0.00 0.00 9.00 2.07 9.00 3.12 Creston‐‐ 3 Mile Lake 2004 33 0 2.26 2.27 3.85 6.00 2.63 13.00 1.94 8.00 2.72 Creston‐‐ 3 Mile Lake 2005 33 0 1.99 1.92 4.23 6.00 1.96 13.00 1.91 9.00 2.15 Creston‐‐ 3 Mile Lake 2006 34 0 1.34 1.34 2.26 7.00 1.60 13.00 1.21 9.00 1.46 Creston‐‐ 3 Mile Lake 2008 29 0 1.69 1.77 3.20 6.00 1.78 12.00 1.29 6.00 2.39 Creston‐‐ 3 Mile Lake 2009 33 0 1.45 1.46 1.98 6.00 1.35 13.00 1.31 7.00 1.84 Creston‐‐ 3 Mile Lake 2011 34 0 2.46 2.40 4.24 6.00 1.43 13.00 2.29 9.00 3.19 Lamoni MunicipalUtilities 2003 24 0 1.85 1.69 5.41 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.05 9.00 3.48 Lamoni MunicipalUtilities 2004 32 0 3.26 2.93 4.89 5.00 1.89 13.00 3.78 8.00 3.51 Lamoni MunicipalUtilities 2005 35 0 2.50 2.45 5.20 7.00 2.81 13.00 2.40 9.00 2.86 Lamoni MunicipalUtilities 2006 30 0 2.78 2.86 6.41 7.00 1.63 13.00 2.44 9.00 3.89 Leon Water Works 2003 27 0 2.86 2.85 4.50 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.38 8.00 3.25 Leon Water Works 2004 33 0 2.54 2.50 4.14 6.00 2.61 13.00 2.25 8.00 3.21 
205 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Leon Water Works 2005 35 0 1.80 1.74 3.53 7.00 1.95 13.00 1.77 9.00 2.09 Leon Water Works 2006 30 0 1.08 1.11 2.29 7.00 1.23 13.00 0.86 9.00 1.26 MontezumaMunicipal Water 2003 27 0 1.43 1.47 1.93 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.27 8.00 1.58 MontezumaMunicipal Water 2004 33 0 1.30 1.29 2.41 6.00 1.17 13.00 1.03 8.00 1.84 MontezumaMunicipal Water 2005 35 0 1.68 1.64 4.57 7.00 1.05 13.00 1.34 9.00 2.59 MontezumaMunicipal Water 2006 35 0 0.87 0.85 2.01 7.00 1.13 13.00 0.78 9.00 0.98 MontezumaMunicipal Water 2007 35 0 0.95 0.94 1.76 7.00 0.77 13.00 0.89 9.00 1.27 MontezumaMunicipal Water 2008 32 0 1.43 1.37 4.59 7.00 0.59 13.00 1.45 7.00 2.14 MontezumaMunicipal Water 2009 33 0 2.48 2.09 6.31 6.00 0.76 12.00 3.05 8.00 3.41 MontezumaMunicipal Water 2010 33 0 1.91 1.53 5.10 5.00 0.71 13.00 2.94 9.00 1.85 MontezumaMunicipal Water 2011 34 0 1.68 1.63 3.28 6.00 0.53 13.00 1.33 9.00 2.64 Osceola Municipal

Water Works 2003 19 0 4.50 3.98 6.97 0.00 0.00 8.00 2.94 7.00 6.06 

Osceola Municipal

Water Works 2004 32 0 2.90 2.83 4.28 5.00 2.74 13.00 3.01 8.00 3.27 

Osceola Municipal

Water Works 2005 34 0 2.81 2.76 4.29 7.00 2.43 12.00 2.76 9.00 3.47 

Osceola Municipal

Water Works 2006 33 0 1.58 1.64 3.25 6.00 2.55 13.00 1.55 8.00 1.59 

Osceola Municipal

Water Works 2007 34 0 1.06 1.05 2.19 7.00 1.21 12.00 0.91 9.00 1.32 

Osceola Municipal

Water Works 2008 29 0 2.20 2.32 6.57 7.00 0.63 12.00 1.23 6.00 4.81 

Osceola Municipal

Water Works 2009 14 0 1.20 1.20 2.20 5.00 1.72 9.00 0.96 0.00 0.00 
206 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Rathbun RegionalWater Association 2004 33 0 2.01 2.08 2.92 6.00 2.17 13.00 1.61 8.00 2.48 Rathbun RegionalWater Association 2005 35 0 1.49 1.50 2.55 7.00 1.86 13.00 1.35 9.00 1.64 Rathbun RegionalWater Association 2006 30 0 1.08 1.12 1.85 7.00 1.19 13.00 0.87 9.00 1.30 Rathburn RegionalWater Association 2003 27 0 2.00 2.00 3.22 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.45 8.00 2.36 Winterset WaterTreatment Plant 2003 24 0 3.88 3.52 6.44 0.00 0.00 10.00 2.91 8.00 4.73 Winterset WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 3.53 2.95 50.23 6.00 1.90 13.00 5.55 8.00 2.70 Winterset WaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 4.24 3.69 31.67 7.00 1.27 13.00 7.06 9.00 3.68 Winterset WaterTreatment Plant 2006 35 0 2.02 1.99 4.25 7.00 2.81 13.00 2.07 9.00 1.95 Winterset WaterTreatment Plant 2007 34 0 3.13 2.72 10.80 7.00 0.74 13.00 4.64 8.00 4.41 Winterset WaterTreatment Plant 2008 31 0 1.31 1.14 6.98 6.00 0.45 13.00 1.71 7.00 1.42 Winterset WaterTreatment Plant 2009 16 0 1.14 1.70 4.06 6.00 0.41 10.00 1.82 0.00 0.00 Aqua IllinoisVermillion Co 2003 25 0 2.21 1.94 17.50 0.00 0.00 11.00 5.97 8.00 1.24 Aqua IllinoisVermillion Co 2004 33 0 1.50 1.14 10.15 6.00 0.40 13.00 2.70 8.00 1.03 Aqua IllinoisVermillion Co 2005 36 0 2.54 1.95 11.05 7.00 0.45 14.00 4.49 9.00 2.32 Aqua IllinoisVermillion Co 2006 34 0 1.38 1.06 6.63 7.00 0.08 13.00 2.94 8.00 1.06 Aqua IllinoisVermillion Co 2007 34 0 1.63 1.39 6.08 7.00 0.44 12.00 2.50 9.00 1.69 
207 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Aqua IllinoisVermillion Co 2008 33 0 1.41 1.15 5.24 7.00 0.42 12.00 1.92 9.00 1.64 Aqua IllinoisVermillion Co 2009 34 0 2.13 1.59 12.62 6.00 0.50 13.00 3.91 8.00 1.29 Aqua IllinoisVermillion Co 2010 33 0 0.85 0.76 4.27 6.00 0.45 12.00 1.41 9.00 0.69 Aqua IllinoisVermillion Co 2011 34 0 2.48 1.81 13.87 6.00 0.45 13.00 5.03 10.00 1.17 Ashland City Hall 2003 27 0 5.26 6.57 10.79 0.00 0.00 13.00 5.84 8.00 5.43 Ashland City Hall 2004 32 0 1.75 1.90 3.86 6.00 2.94 12.00 1.47 8.00 1.79 Ashland City Hall 2005 34 0 0.82 0.74 2.51 7.00 0.62 13.00 0.99 9.00 0.99 Ashland City Hall 2006 34 0 0.35 0.36 1.02 7.00 0.41 13.00 0.32 8.00 0.51 Ashland City Hall 2007 34 0 0.53 0.52 0.76 7.00 0.53 13.00 0.52 9.00 0.57 Ashland City Hall 2008 30 0 1.12 1.11 2.55 6.00 0.47 12.00 0.85 7.00 1.82 Ashland City Hall 2009 31 0 0.93 0.93 1.73 6.00 1.03 11.00 0.96 8.00 1.10 Ashland City Hall 2010 29 0 2.44 1.84 5.30 4.00 0.51 13.00 3.22 9.00 2.30 Ashland City Hall 2011 7 0 0.90 0.86 1.07 5.00 0.97 2.00 0.82 0.00 0.00 Carlinville Water

Works 2003 22 0 3.05 2.65 6.60 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.80 8.00 4.20 

Carlinville Water

Works 2004 29 0 3.67 3.40 15.48 6.00 1.08 11.00 5.05 7.00 4.37 

Carlinville Water

Works 2005 35 0 1.56 1.50 5.22 7.00 0.68 13.00 0.79 9.00 3.09 

Carlinville Water

Works 2006 31 0 2.13 1.91 7.60 7.00 1.92 11.00 2.71 8.00 2.09 

Carlinville Water

Works 2007 33 0 2.91 2.66 7.06 6.00 1.03 13.00 3.28 9.00 3.77 

Carlinville Water

Works 2008 29 0 3.30 2.67 12.16 5.00 1.55 13.00 4.28 7.00 3.61 

Carlinville Water

Works 2009 28 0 3.91 3.41 21.38 5.00 3.45 11.00 5.12 7.00 3.65 
208 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Carlinville Water

Works 2010 33 0 4.81 3.50 47.16 5.00 0.73 13.00 9.79 9.00 2.45 

Carlinville Water

Works 2011 50 0 3.65 3.17 25.65 8.00 1.94 19.00 5.92 13.00 2.42 

Carthage PublicUtilities 2003 26 0 1.55 1.41 2.64 0.00 0.00 12.00 1.53 8.00 1.77 Carthage PublicUtilities 2004 32 0 1.36 1.28 3.09 6.00 0.39 13.00 1.05 8.00 2.47 Carthage PublicUtilities 2005 34 0 3.97 3.50 11.70 7.00 0.39 13.00 5.45 9.00 4.57 Carthage PublicUtilities 2006 30 0 1.90 1.91 4.67 7.00 3.45 13.00 1.48 9.00 1.66 Centralia WaterTreatment Plant 2003 28 0 4.68 2.95 33.49 0.00 0.00 14.00 6.39 8.00 2.89 Centralia WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 2.68 2.19 6.68 6.00 0.99 13.00 3.92 8.00 3.25 Centralia WaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 4.07 3.12 15.27 7.00 0.41 13.00 7.73 9.00 3.43 Centralia WaterTreatment Plant 2006 34 0 3.33 2.90 12.33 7.00 1.51 13.00 5.25 8.00 2.93 Centralia WaterTreatment Plant 2007 34 0 5.64 4.57 15.17 7.00 3.70 13.00 10.40 9.00 2.39 Centralia WaterTreatment Plant 2008 32 0 2.84 2.50 7.60 7.00 2.85 12.00 3.96 8.00 1.96 Centralia WaterTreatment Plant 2009 33 0 2.78 2.69 5.74 6.00 3.47 12.00 3.28 8.00 2.10 Centralia WaterTreatment Plant 2010 33 0 2.70 2.28 9.80 5.00 1.28 13.00 4.17 9.00 1.55 Centralia WaterTreatment Plant‐‐

Raccoon Lake 2008 7 0 3.72 2.67 9.43 0.00 0.00 6.00 3.52 1.00 2.80 

Centralia WaterTreatment Plant‐‐

Raccoon Lake

Not enoughdata for2011

City of Waverly 2003 24 0 4.65 3.32 20.92 0.00 0.00 12.00 5.58 6.00 3.76 City of Waverly 2004 33 0 3.00 2.77 8.00 6.00 1.08 13.00 3.60 8.00 3.73 
209 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

City of Waverly 2005 35 0 2.16 1.99 5.98 7.00 0.60 13.00 2.30 9.00 3.65 City of Waverly 2006 34 0 2.14 2.13 6.91 7.00 1.15 13.00 2.07 8.00 3.33 City of Waverly 2007 25 0 1.37 1.35 1.97 6.00 1.29 10.00 1.49 5.00 1.45 City of Waverly 2008 26 0 1.91 1.56 12.03 6.00 0.85 10.00 2.48 7.00 2.20 City of Waverly 2009 28 0 2.92 1.98 8.54 6.00 0.71 11.00 4.06 7.00 2.56 City of Waverly 2010 18 0 1.43 1.11 5.40 1.00 0.37 8.00 2.63 4.00 0.94 City of Waverly 2011 21 0 1.51 1.20 5.44 3.00 0.49 9.00 2.67 6.00 0.86 Coulterville Water

Treatment Plant 2003 27 0 8.61 6.21 33.16 0.00 0.00 13.00 4.63 8.00 18.14 

Coulterville Water

Treatment Plant 2004 33 0 2.60 2.47 5.05 6.00 1.10 13.00 2.62 8.00 3.79 

Coulterville Water

Treatment Plant 2005 35 0 0.78 0.79 1.98 7.00 0.99 13.00 0.77 9.00 0.64 

Coulterville Water

Treatment Plant 2006 35 0 2.10 1.68 8.34 7.00 1.34 13.00 3.34 9.00 1.54 

Coulterville Water

Treatment Plant 2007 35 0 3.39 3.00 8.83 7.00 0.48 13.00 4.64 9.00 3.86 

Coulterville Water

Treatment Plant 2008 32 0 4.35 3.46 44.22 6.00 2.17 13.00 7.16 8.00 2.61 

Coulterville Water

Treatment Plant 2009 26 0 4.85 5.18 16.26 5.00 1.59 13.00 2.63 7.00 9.89 

Coulterville Water

Treatment Plant 2010 20 0 2.66 2.71 5.38 0.00 0.00 6.00 3.56 9.00 2.50 
210 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Coulterville Water

Treatment Plant 2011 32 0 2.11 1.97 5.97 4.00 0.85 13.00 1.45 9.00 3.42 

Evansville

Not enough

data for2003

Evansville 2004 33 0 4.07 3.03 35.33 6.00 0.93 13.00 8.17 8.00 2.01 Evansville 2005 35 0 4.58 3.43 35.86 7.00 0.77 13.00 9.51 9.00 2.30 Evansville 2006 34 0 3.80 2.83 25.07 7.00 1.39 13.00 7.65 9.00 1.33 Evansville 2007 35 0 3.83 3.22 16.37 7.00 2.65 13.00 6.52 9.00 2.69 Evansville 2008 25 0 3.59 2.64 18.91 6.00 2.37 11.00 5.25 5.00 2.07 Evansville 2009 26 0 3.37 2.64 13.55 0.00 0.00 12.00 4.35 8.00 2.63 Evansville 2010 33 0 3.82 2.96 19.28 5.00 1.74 13.00 6.86 9.00 1.94 Evansville 2011 32 0 3.15 2.88 14.50 4.00 3.10 13.00 4.81 9.00 1.95 Fairfield 2010 22 0 2.08 2.63 5.41 0.00 0.00 3.00 3.44 6.00 2.26 Fairfield 2011 39 0 2.73 2.89 8.20 6.00 4.44 13.00 3.23 7.00 1.96 Farina WaterTreatment Plant 2003 26 0 1.64 1.76 2.65 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.68 8.00 1.61 Farina WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 1.63 1.65 3.35 6.00 2.52 13.00 1.60 8.00 1.48 Farina WaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 2.50 2.51 10.08 7.00 1.18 13.00 2.20 9.00 2.83 Farina WaterTreatment Plant 2006 32 0 5.74 5.62 10.50 7.00 8.44 13.00 5.04 8.00 4.30 Farina WaterTreatment Plant 2007 42 0 4.75 4.98 12.15 7.00 7.40 13.00 5.04 9.00 3.58 Farina WaterTreatment Plant 2008 33 0 6.03 6.07 9.78 6.00 5.45 10.00 5.88 8.00 6.24 Farina WaterTreatment Plant 2009 39 0 5.17 6.08 16.88 6.00 12.67 13.00 4.37 7.00 4.18 Farina Water 2010 41 0 5.32 4.94 9.05 6.00 4.34 13.00 6.80 9.00 3.40 
211 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Treatment PlantFarina WaterTreatment Plant 2011 39 0 5.78 5.93 10.52 6.00 8.86 13.00 5.61 8.00 3.44 Flora WaterTreatment Plant 2004 26 0 2.49 1.78 12.74 0.00 0.00 12.00 3.42 8.00 1.68 Flora WaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 4.07 3.98 27.91 7.00 0.57 13.00 5.42 9.00 1.27 Flora WaterTreatment Plant 2006 33 0 4.93 4.74 19.61 5.00 2.79 13.00 5.90 9.00 0.97 Flora WaterTreatment Plant 2007 42 0 4.65 4.51 36.14 7.00 5.32 13.00 8.57 9.00 1.27 Flora WaterTreatment Plant 2008 20 0 6.36 4.00 30.56 6.00 4.52 13.00 7.57 1.00 2.02 Gillespie Water

Treatment Plant 2003 27 0 3.51 2.87 7.23 0.00 0.00 13.00 3.86 8.00 3.33 

Gillespie Water

Treatment Plant 2004 33 0 4.08 3.71 21.01 6.00 1.71 13.00 5.03 8.00 4.74 

Gillespie Water

Treatment Plant 2005 35 0 0.96 0.94 2.66 7.00 0.64 13.00 0.90 9.00 1.46 

Gillespie Water

Treatment Plant 2006 35 0 2.10 1.89 6.05 7.00 1.40 13.00 2.84 9.00 1.93 

Gillespie Water

Treatment Plant 2007 35 0 4.13 3.93 11.41 7.00 3.79 13.00 4.78 9.00 3.85 

Gillespie Water

Treatment Plant 2008 31 0 3.86 3.36 15.57 6.00 2.21 13.00 4.75 7.00 4.32 

Gillespie Water

Treatment Plant 2009 7 0 5.69 6.02 6.31 6.00 5.50 1.00 6.19 0.00 0.00 

Greenfield WaterTreatment Plant 2003 27 0 3.04 2.76 4.43 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.48 8.00 3.74 Greenfield WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 1.70 1.75 2.49 6.00 2.19 13.00 1.59 8.00 1.81 Greenfield WaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 0.53 0.52 1.32 7.00 0.58 13.00 0.49 9.00 0.60 
212 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Greenfield WaterTreatment Plant 2006 29 0 0.10 0.08 0.31 7.00 0.05 12.00 0.09 9.00 0.14 Hettick Water Supply 2003 15 0 4.38 4.05 12.73 0.00 0.00 10.00 2.62 5.00 8.65 Hettick Water Supply

Not enough

data for2004

Highland WaterTreatment Plant 2003 27 0 2.75 2.69 7.72 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.78 8.00 4.33 Highland WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 2.08 2.12 4.05 6.00 0.78 13.00 1.82 8.00 3.33 Highland WaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 0.72 0.70 2.03 7.00 0.49 13.00 0.58 9.00 1.16 Highland WaterTreatment Plant 2006 29 0 1.83 1.83 3.28 7.00 1.62 13.00 1.50 8.00 2.56 Hillsboro 2007 41 0 1.65 1.67 2.57 6.00 1.58 13.00 1.51 9.00 1.89 Hillsboro 2008 35 0 1.91 1.93 5.18 6.00 1.75 12.00 1.82 8.00 3.06 Hillsboro 2010 40 0 2.43 2.09 19.55 5.00 0.79 13.00 4.82 9.00 1.63 Hillsboro‐ GlennShoals 2003 19 0 4.55 2.96 21.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 3.05 9.00 4.21 Hillsboro‐ GlennShoals 2004 28 0 1.14 1.14 2.37 5.00 0.92 13.00 0.97 7.00 1.79 Hillsboro‐ GlennShoals 2005 23 0 1.93 1.77 4.17 5.00 0.48 10.00 2.27 5.00 2.64 Hillsboro‐ GlennShoals 2006 27 0 1.70 1.53 7.23 6.00 1.12 10.00 1.99 6.00 1.84 Hillsboro‐ GlennShoals 2009 40 0 2.71 2.70 5.94 6.00 2.57 13.00 3.20 8.00 2.86 Hillsboro‐ GlennShoals 2011 40 0 2.05 1.98 5.90 6.00 1.66 13.00 2.53 8.00 1.96 Hillsboro‐‐Lake 2003 15 0 6.91 7.81 16.46 0.00 0.00 4.00 11.49 9.00 4.58 Hillsboro‐‐Lake

Not enough

data for2004
213 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Hillsboro‐‐Lake

Not enough

data for2006

Holiday ShoresSanitary District 2003 24 0 4.04 3.41 6.60 0.00 0.00 10.00 3.23 8.00 4.77 Holiday ShoresSanitary District 2004 33 0 3.19 3.12 5.92 6.00 2.47 13.00 3.20 8.00 3.61 Holiday ShoresSanitary District 2005 35 0 1.86 1.83 6.42 7.00 2.31 13.00 2.01 9.00 1.81 Holiday ShoresSanitary District 2006 30 0 0.98 0.93 1.93 7.00 1.22 13.00 0.81 9.00 1.06 Kaskaskia WaterDistrict 2003 27 0 3.67 2.57 21.99 0.00 0.00 13.00 4.66 8.00 2.97 Kaskaskia WaterDistrict 2004 33 0 3.29 2.52 27.75 6.00 1.07 13.00 6.55 8.00 1.55 Kaskaskia WaterDistrict 2005 35 0 5.63 4.10 70.61 7.00 0.74 13.00 12.85 9.00 1.70 Kaskaskia WaterDistrict 2006 35 0 3.22 2.63 19.47 7.00 1.83 13.00 5.83 9.00 1.56 Kaskaskia WaterDistrict 2007 35 0 4.55 3.58 25.90 7.00 2.42 13.00 8.79 9.00 1.89 Kaskaskia WaterDistrict 2008 30 0 3.42 2.70 16.53 6.00 2.52 12.00 5.02 8.00 2.19 Kaskaskia WaterDistrict 2009 34 0 3.39 2.93 10.60 6.00 3.11 13.00 4.74 8.00 2.62 Kaskaskia WaterDistrict 2010 33 0 3.95 3.11 19.11 5.00 1.79 13.00 7.53 9.00 1.82 Kaskaskia WaterDistrict 2011 34 0 3.33 2.86 15.55 6.00 2.75 13.00 5.19 9.00 2.04 Kinkaid Area Water

System 2003 27 0 2.55 2.09 4.76 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.98 8.00 3.01 

Kinkaid Area Water

System 2004 33 0 2.71 2.64 5.88 6.00 2.08 13.00 2.89 8.00 2.84 

Kinkaid Area Water

System 2005 35 0 1.48 1.41 3.46 7.00 1.68 13.00 1.82 9.00 1.43 

Kinkaid Area Water

System 2006 34 0 0.55 0.55 1.27 7.00 0.79 12.00 0.59 9.00 0.48 
214 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Kinkaid Area Water

System 2007 34 0 0.64 0.65 0.84 7.00 0.64 13.00 0.62 9.00 0.67 

Kinkaid Area Water

System 2008 32 0 0.82 0.87 1.82 6.00 0.57 13.00 0.73 8.00 0.90 

Kinkaid Area Water

System 2009 7 0 0.92 0.87 1.06 6.00 0.93 1.00 0.86 0.00 0.00 

Mattoon 2007 25 0 1.52 1.64 2.42 0.00 0.00 12.00 1.80 8.00 1.35 Mattoon 2008 32 0 3.09 3.03 7.29 6.00 6.04 13.00 3.56 8.00 1.40 Mattoon 2009 32 0 5.06 5.45 19.12 6.00 11.62 12.00 2.82 7.00 2.94 Mattoon 2010 31 0 2.86 3.41 10.81 5.00 8.31 12.00 3.21 8.00 0.76 Mattoon 2011 34 0 2.69 2.75 8.18 6.00 4.45 13.00 2.71 9.00 1.62 Mt. Olive Water

Works 2003 25 0 15.41 10.12 30.88 0.00 0.00 11.00 13.34 8.00 17.98 

Mt. Olive Water

Works 2004 33 0 4.18 3.92 12.80 6.00 3.56 13.00 4.59 8.00 4.80 

Mt. Olive Water

Works 2005 35 0 0.66 0.67 2.28 7.00 0.81 13.00 0.75 9.00 0.69 

Mt. Olive Water

Works 2006 35 0 3.35 3.33 10.48 7.00 0.35 13.00 3.02 9.00 6.54 

Mt. Olive Water

Works 2007 35 0 6.27 5.84 13.58 7.00 2.75 13.00 7.60 9.00 7.61 

Mt. Olive Water

Works 2008 32 0 6.38 5.34 34.10 6.00 4.35 13.00 6.98 8.00 7.61 

Mt. Olive Water

Works 2009 34 0 2.75 2.52 6.84 6.00 1.62 13.00 2.87 8.00 3.88 

Mt. Olive Water

Works 2010 34 0 1.20 1.10 2.11 6.00 0.72 13.00 1.38 9.00 1.31 

Mt. Olive Water

Works 2011 35 0 1.06 0.99 2.33 6.00 0.70 13.00 1.06 10.00 1.35 

Mt. Olive Water

Works (New Lake) 2005 4 0 1.45 1.21 1.91 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.15 2.00 1.34 

Nashville Water Plant 2003 21 0 5.10 3.27 27.76 0.00 0.00 7.00 4.74 8.00 3.67 
215 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Nashville Water Plant 2004 33 0 3.46 3.04 8.34 6.00 2.50 13.00 4.49 8.00 3.60 Nashville Water Plant 2005 35 0 3.00 2.58 9.50 7.00 0.48 13.00 4.40 9.00 4.04 Nashville Water Plant 2006 35 0 4.80 3.86 31.62 7.00 1.03 13.00 8.48 9.00 3.86 Nashville Water Plant 2007 35 0 1.77 1.73 2.67 7.00 1.73 13.00 1.92 9.00 1.81 Nashville Water Plant 2008 31 0 9.47 6.52 69.04 5.00 1.21 13.00 18.51 8.00 4.44 Nashville Water Plant 2009 15 0 6.19 5.22 19.51 6.00 1.14 9.00 8.30 0.00 0.00 New Berlin

Not enoughdata for2003

New Berlin 2004 29 0 0.56 0.58 0.91 4.00 0.83 12.00 0.58 8.00 0.52 New Berlin 2005 34 0 0.44 0.39 2.05 7.00 0.25 13.00 0.59 9.00 0.40 New Berlin 2006 27 0 0.20 0.19 0.47 5.00 0.14 12.00 0.16 9.00 0.29 New Berlin 2007 30 0 0.48 0.47 0.62 5.00 0.44 12.00 0.49 9.00 0.51 New Berlin 2008 19 0 0.70 0.69 1.00 4.00 0.62 10.00 0.72 3.00 0.80 New Berlin 2009 26 0 0.85 0.86 1.40 6.00 0.50 12.00 0.81 5.00 1.16 New Berlin 2010 25 0 0.78 0.80 1.11 5.00 0.74 11.00 0.84 3.00 0.92 New Berlin 2011 33 0 0.98 0.94 1.36 6.00 0.68 12.00 1.10 9.00 1.03 Otter Lake WaterCommission 2003 26 0 1.87 1.67 5.89 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.03 7.00 1.75 Otter Lake WaterCommission 2004 33 0 1.27 1.29 2.32 6.00 1.58 13.00 1.34 8.00 0.95 Otter Lake WaterCommission 2005 34 0 1.80 1.48 5.58 7.00 0.52 13.00 2.43 8.00 2.13 Otter Lake WaterCommission 2006 28 0 0.76 0.64 1.31 7.00 1.06 11.00 0.61 9.00 0.68 Palmyra‐ModestoWater Commission 2003 20 0 5.05 4.66 7.22 0.00 0.00 7.00 4.98 8.00 5.15 
216 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Palmyra‐ModestoWater Commission 2004 31 0 3.25 3.23 4.89 6.00 3.30 11.00 3.14 8.00 3.72 Palmyra‐ModestoWater Commission 2005 35 0 1.33 1.24 3.91 7.00 0.86 13.00 1.27 9.00 1.95 Palmyra‐ModestoWater Commission 2006 30 0 0.77 0.72 1.45 7.00 0.94 13.00 0.74 9.00 0.68 Paris

Not enough

data for2003

Paris 2004 33 0 2.44 2.19 11.15 6.00 0.51 13.00 2.61 8.00 3.95 Paris 2005 33 0 0.94 0.88 3.34 6.00 0.58 12.00 1.23 9.00 1.16 Paris 2006 35 0 4.16 3.44 29.25 7.00 0.46 13.00 6.93 9.00 3.73 Paris 2007 32 0 1.46 1.49 3.25 6.00 2.30 12.00 1.30 9.00 1.06 Paris 2008 30 0 3.00 2.83 6.99 6.00 3.02 12.00 3.02 8.00 3.38 Paris 2009 26 0 3.12 2.56 16.34 6.00 1.69 11.00 3.99 6.00 2.76 Paris

Not enough

data for2010

Patoka‐‐ EastReservoir 2006 17 0 2.97 4.05 7.66 2.00 1.46 13.00 2.69 2.00 5.96 Patoka‐‐ N ForkKaskaskia River 2006 15 0 5.70 3.27 23.59 3.00 3.62 10.00 6.49 2.00 1.43 Patoka‐‐WestReservoir 2006 16 0 10.44 12.69 26.32 2.00 22.82 12.00 10.14 2.00 8.47 Pittsfield WaterTreatment Plant 2003 27 0 3.36 3.13 5.31 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.71 8.00 4.38 Pittsfield WaterTreatment Plant 2004 34 0 2.00 2.01 3.02 6.00 2.47 13.00 1.99 8.00 2.13 Pittsfield WaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 0.71 0.67 5.20 7.00 0.61 13.00 0.60 9.00 1.05 
217 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Pittsfield WaterTreatment Plant 2006 29 0 0.28 0.29 0.75 7.00 0.20 12.00 0.21 9.00 0.42 Salem WaterTreatment Plant 2003 26 0 2.33 2.07 13.17 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.79 7.00 3.81 Salem WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 1.42 1.24 4.16 6.00 0.48 13.00 1.79 8.00 2.09 Salem WaterTreatment Plant 2005 34 0 2.09 2.12 10.66 7.00 0.55 13.00 2.04 8.00 1.86 Salem WaterTreatment Plant 2006 30 0 6.98 5.62 14.75 7.00 9.03 13.00 8.74 9.00 3.40 Springfield CityWater, Light, andPower 2003 27 0 2.78 2.48 5.17 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.54 8.00 4.07 Springfield CityWater, Light, andPower 2004 33 0 1.92 2.05 3.39 6.00 2.31 13.00 1.23 8.00 2.77 Springfield CityWater, Light, andPower 2005 35 0 0.94 0.95 1.95 7.00 1.04 13.00 0.68 9.00 1.41 Springfield CityWater, Light, andPower 2006 30 0 0.77 0.83 1.68 7.00 0.54 13.00 0.55 9.00 1.31 Vermont Water

Treatment Plant 2003 27 0 4.81 3.86 7.93 0.00 0.00 13.00 4.66 8.00 5.23 

Vermont Water

Treatment Plant 2004 33 0 1.85 1.87 3.07 6.00 2.14 13.00 1.60 8.00 2.28 

Vermont Water

Treatment Plant 2005 35 0 2.26 2.02 4.29 7.00 0.52 13.00 3.15 9.00 2.76 

Vermont Water

Treatment Plant 2006 35 0 0.87 0.90 2.12 7.00 1.50 13.00 0.72 9.00 0.91 

Vermont Water

Treatment Plant 2007 35 0 3.19 2.79 11.52 7.00 0.53 13.00 4.62 9.00 3.44 

Vermont Water

Treatment Plant 2008 32 0 1.37 1.31 4.49 7.00 1.33 13.00 1.19 7.00 2.01 

Vermont Water

Treatment Plant 2009 34 0 5.54 4.32 47.02 6.00 0.46 13.00 10.32 8.00 2.97 
218 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Vermont Water

Treatment Plant 2010 34 0 2.92 2.25 17.27 6.00 1.41 13.00 5.93 9.00 1.05 

Vermont Water

Treatment Plant 2011 34 0 3.59 2.98 12.94 6.00 0.54 13.00 5.45 9.00 3.43 

Wayne City SideChannel 2003 7 0 1.77 1.75 2.07 0.00 0.00 5.00 1.62 2.00 1.90 Wayne City SkilletCreek 2003 27 0 6.40 3.67 46.22 0.00 0.00 13.00 10.01 8.00 2.96 Wayne City SkilletCreek 2004 32 0 4.60 3.23 29.33 6.00 0.91 13.00 8.97 8.00 2.50 Wayne City SkilletCreek 2005 35 0 4.13 3.26 23.26 7.00 0.54 13.00 7.14 9.00 2.44 Wayne City SkilletCreek 2006 34 0 3.03 2.86 17.03 7.00 1.40 12.00 6.14 9.00 1.20 Wayne City SkilletCreek 2007 35 0 3.47 2.85 20.40 7.00 1.49 13.00 6.28 9.00 1.47 Wayne City SkilletCreek 2008 29 0 4.52 5.12 23.98 6.00 3.80 11.00 8.14 7.00 6.07 Wayne City SkilletCreek 2009 15 0 4.98 5.13 23.56 6.00 3.10 9.00 5.93 0.00 0.00 Batesville Water

Treatment Plant 2003 26 0 2.79 2.50 5.27 0.00 0.00 12.00 1.26 8.00 4.42 

Batesville Water

Treatment Plant 2004 33 0 2.11 2.28 4.57 6.00 1.68 13.00 0.99 8.00 3.68 

Batesville Water

Treatment Plant 2005 35 0 1.83 1.76 4.18 7.00 1.87 13.00 1.52 9.00 2.51 

Batesville Water

Treatment Plant 2006 35 0 2.22 2.28 6.57 7.00 1.40 13.00 1.14 9.00 4.67 

Batesville Water

Treatment Plant 2007 35 0 1.08 1.13 2.07 7.00 1.46 13.00 0.92 9.00 1.15 

Batesville Water

Treatment Plant 2008 31 0 3.39 3.29 10.07 6.00 2.00 12.00 2.45 8.00 5.38 

Batesville Water

Treatment Plant 2009 33 0 1.75 1.77 3.21 5.00 2.73 13.00 1.96 8.00 1.28 

Batesville Water

Treatment Plant 2010 30 0 3.89 3.71 7.04 3.00 4.03 12.00 4.85 9.00 3.49 
219 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Batesville Water

Treatment Plant 2011 35 0 1.53 1.55 2.89 7.00 2.16 13.00 1.48 9.00 1.18 

Bedford WaterDepartment 2003 25 0 1.98 1.21 6.49 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.31 8.00 1.59 Bedford WaterDepartment 2004 33 0 1.84 1.30 9.77 6.00 0.35 13.00 3.42 8.00 1.07 Bedford WaterDepartment 2005 34 0 3.15 2.37 36.87 6.00 0.49 13.00 6.63 9.00 0.98 Bedford WaterDepartment 2006 35 0 2.79 2.14 27.65 7.00 0.55 13.00 5.98 9.00 0.74 Bedford WaterDepartment 2007 35 0 1.06 0.89 12.44 7.00 0.53 13.00 1.93 9.00 0.59 Bedford WaterDepartment 2008 32 0 1.97 1.53 13.95 6.00 1.11 13.00 3.55 8.00 1.05 Bedford WaterDepartment 2009 34 0 1.84 1.43 11.97 6.00 0.60 13.00 3.66 8.00 0.86 Bedford WaterDepartment 2010 34 0 1.85 1.38 10.02 6.00 0.59 13.00 3.87 9.00 0.61 Bedford WaterDepartment 2011 138 0 2.35 1.35 20.53 6.00 0.62 90.00 3.15 36.00 0.65 Fort Wayne‐Three

River Filtration Plant 2003 26 0 2.23 1.33 8.71 0.00 0.00 12.00 3.42 8.00 1.23 

Fort Wayne‐Three

River Filtration Plant 2004 33 0 1.74 1.28 9.45 6.00 0.34 13.00 3.11 8.00 1.29 

Fort Wayne‐Three

River Filtration Plant 2005 35 0 0.87 0.74 2.56 7.00 0.41 13.00 1.21 9.00 0.91 

Fort Wayne‐Three

River Filtration Plant 2006 29 0 0.85 0.90 4.99 7.00 0.11 7.00 2.52 9.00 0.75 

Fort Wayne‐Three

River Filtration Plant 2007 35 0 1.03 0.87 4.43 7.00 0.54 13.00 1.71 9.00 0.80 
220 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Fort Wayne‐Three

River Filtration Plant 2008 30 0 1.26 0.91 11.40 6.00 0.40 11.00 1.83 8.00 0.99 

Fort Wayne‐Three

River Filtration Plant 2009 8 0 0.73 1.36 2.31 6.00 0.51 1.00 0.40 1.00 2.25 

Indianapolis‐‐EagleCreek WaterTreatment Plant 2003 25 0 3.53 2.20 18.97 0.00 0.00 12.00 4.84 7.00 2.45 Indianapolis‐‐EagleCreek WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 1.35 1.33 2.71 6.00 0.52 13.00 1.04 8.00 2.07 Indianapolis‐‐EagleCreek WaterTreatment Plant 2005 34 0 3.33 2.67 8.68 7.00 0.45 13.00 5.40 9.00 3.51 Indianapolis‐‐EagleCreek WaterTreatment Plant 2006 33 0 0.97 1.01 3.18 7.00 0.68 12.00 0.88 8.00 1.36 Jasper MunicipalWater 2003 27 0 0.96 0.66 4.53 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.37 8.00 0.60 Jasper MunicipalWater 2004 33 0 1.37 1.09 11.31 6.00 0.44 13.00 2.28 8.00 1.02 Jasper MunicipalWater 2005 34 0 0.93 0.77 5.97 7.00 0.51 13.00 1.68 9.00 0.50 Jasper MunicipalWater 2006 35 0 0.26 0.20 1.48 7.00 0.05 13.00 0.44 9.00 0.26 Jasper MunicipalWater 2007 35 0 0.43 0.41 0.97 7.00 0.39 13.00 0.46 9.00 0.44 Jasper MunicipalWater 2008 32 0 0.53 0.47 3.71 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.71 8.00 0.42 Jasper MunicipalWater 2009 7 0 0.40 0.41 0.44 6.00 0.40 1.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 Logansport

Not enough

data for2003

Logansport 2004 33 0 2.07 1.51 26.80 6.00 0.59 13.00 4.16 8.00 0.98 
221 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Logansport 2005 35 0 1.30 1.02 19.44 7.00 0.46 13.00 2.51 9.00 0.76 Logansport 2006 35 0 1.29 0.96 15.98 7.00 0.28 13.00 2.82 9.00 0.55 Logansport 2007 35 0 0.77 0.68 2.90 7.00 0.58 13.00 1.19 9.00 0.52 Logansport 2008 31 0 2.50 1.70 33.32 6.00 0.63 13.00 5.07 8.00 0.73 Logansport 2009 34 0 0.97 0.80 4.73 6.00 0.53 13.00 1.70 8.00 0.53 Logansport 2010 34 0 1.60 1.19 8.85 6.00 0.44 13.00 3.30 9.00 0.64 Logansport 2011 34 0 1.19 0.95 12.03 6.00 0.50 13.00 2.20 9.00 0.54 Logansport 1899 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Logansport 2006 35 0 1.29 0.96 15.98 7.00 0.28 13.00 2.82 9.00 0.55 Logansport 2010 34 0 1.60 1.19 8.85 6.00 0.44 13.00 3.30 9.00 0.64 Mitchell Water Plant 2005 28 0 2.53 1.65 22.75 0.00 0.00 13.00 4.71 9.00 1.10 Mitchell Water Plant 2006 34 0 2.34 1.77 24.37 7.00 0.49 13.00 5.22 9.00 0.62 Mitchell Water Plant 2007 32 0 1.09 0.96 8.33 6.00 0.97 13.00 1.66 8.00 0.68 Mitchell Water Plant 2008 28 0 1.78 1.31 8.82 6.00 0.77 11.00 3.04 8.00 0.99 Mitchell Water Plant 2009 28 0 1.83 1.34 10.67 2.00 0.59 12.00 3.13 6.00 0.87 Mitchell Water Plant 2010 17 0 2.36 1.07 14.63 5.00 0.52 11.00 3.04 1.00 0.37 North Vernon 2007 21 0 1.95 1.48 3.93 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.93 8.00 1.86 North Vernon 2008 28 0 3.44 2.53 14.13 7.00 1.36 11.00 4.60 6.00 3.18 North Vernon 2009 33 0 2.65 2.04 16.23 6.00 0.92 13.00 3.98 7.00 1.29 North Vernon 2010 34 0 2.41 2.20 8.48 6.00 1.50 12.00 3.78 10.00 1.42 North Vernon 2011 136 0 3.97 2.63 30.44 6.00 1.24 88.00 5.02 36.00 1.53 Santee Utilities Inc. 2003 23 0 4.94 3.06 18.20 0.00 0.00 9.00 3.21 8.00 7.05 Santee Utilities Inc. 2004 33 0 2.26 2.13 5.10 6.00 0.42 13.00 2.13 8.00 4.14 Santee Utilities Inc. 2005 35 0 4.41 3.74 36.71 7.00 0.59 13.00 6.77 9.00 5.20 
222 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Santee Utilities Inc. 2006 35 0 4.37 3.87 17.82 7.00 2.68 13.00 5.64 9.00 4.72 Santee Utilities Inc. 1899 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Santee Utilities Inc. 2003 23 0 4.94 3.06 18.20 0.00 0.00 9.00 3.21 8.00 7.05 Santee Utilities Inc. 2005 35 0 4.41 3.74 36.71 7.00 0.59 13.00 6.77 9.00 5.20 Stucker Fork WaterTreatment Plant 2003 26 0 1.06 0.73 2.91 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.41 9.00 0.88 Stucker Fork WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 2.54 1.93 14.97 6.00 0.35 13.00 4.23 8.00 2.27 Stucker Fork WaterTreatment Plant 2005 32 0 3.30 2.45 21.54 6.00 0.46 12.00 6.24 9.00 1.55 Stucker Fork WaterTreatment Plant 2006 34 0 2.33 1.78 26.72 7.00 0.50 12.00 4.53 9.00 1.62 Stucker Fork WaterTreatment Plant 2007 41 0 1.58 1.32 11.82 7.00 0.53 12.00 3.26 9.00 0.92 Stucker Fork WaterTreatment Plant 2008 37 0 2.16 1.72 14.01 7.00 0.50 13.00 3.67 8.00 2.09 Stucker Fork WaterTreatment Plant 2009 37 0 2.11 1.76 20.25 6.00 0.50 13.00 4.78 6.00 1.30 Stucker Fork WaterTreatment Plant 2011 38 0 1.77 1.50 25.48 6.00 0.47 12.00 3.75 7.00 1.11 Stucker Fork WaterUtility 2008 37 0 2.16 1.72 14.01 7.00 0.50 13.00 3.67 8.00 2.09 Stucker Fork WaterUtility 2010 37 0 2.80 2.31 30.37 5.00 0.40 13.00 6.39 6.00 1.54 Versailles WaterWorks 2003 26 0 3.55 2.11 27.54 0.00 0.00 12.00 4.82 10.00 2.23 
223 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Versailles WaterWorks 2004 31 0 2.73 2.00 14.39 5.00 0.55 13.00 3.94 8.00 2.57 Versailles WaterWorks 2005 35 0 7.22 5.34 33.48 7.00 0.38 13.00 14.62 9.00 4.29 Versailles WaterWorks 2006 29 0 4.56 3.45 38.07 7.00 1.06 10.00 7.08 8.00 3.86 Versailles WaterWorks 2007 33 0 1.09 1.01 3.44 6.00 0.72 13.00 1.15 8.00 1.49 Versailles WaterWorks 2008 29 0 1.93 1.48 14.31 6.00 0.50 12.00 2.25 6.00 2.35 Versailles WaterWorks 2009 29 0 1.75 1.57 17.86 6.00 0.54 12.00 2.93 5.00 1.94 Versailles WaterWorks 2010 31 0 1.57 1.42 5.87 5.00 1.53 13.00 2.40 7.00 1.12 Versailles WaterWorks 2011 33 0 1.76 1.55 7.26 6.00 0.62 12.00 1.31 9.00 2.62 Westport WaterCompany 2003 24 0 1.10 1.14 5.90 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.38 7.00 1.49 Westport WaterCompany 2004 31 0 1.31 1.19 3.42 5.00 0.84 13.00 1.62 7.00 1.35 Westport WaterCompany 2005 32 0 1.02 0.89 2.82 6.00 0.73 12.00 1.19 9.00 1.01 Westport WaterCompany 2006 32 0 1.05 0.95 3.62 5.00 0.62 12.00 1.29 9.00 1.17 Westport WaterCompany 2007 34 0 2.31 1.80 29.11 7.00 0.81 13.00 4.45 8.00 1.00 Westport WaterCompany 2008 29 0 1.00 1.03 1.79 4.00 0.97 13.00 0.89 8.00 1.14 Westport WaterCompany 2009 27 0 0.84 0.83 1.25 3.00 0.72 11.00 0.75 7.00 1.08 Westport WaterCompany 2010 32 0 0.97 0.89 1.92 6.00 0.66 13.00 1.15 9.00 1.02 Westport WaterCompany 2011 34 0 1.00 0.97 1.93 6.00 0.70 13.00 0.89 9.00 1.28 Winslow WaterWorks 2003 26 0 2.74 1.57 29.39 0.00 0.00 13.00 4.33 8.00 1.24 
224 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Winslow WaterWorks 2004 33 0 2.84 2.05 22.20 6.00 0.37 13.00 6.11 8.00 1.28 Winslow WaterWorks 2005 32 0 2.67 2.10 15.90 7.00 0.41 13.00 5.29 8.00 1.76 Winslow WaterWorks 2006 34 0 1.89 1.25 18.97 6.00 0.13 13.00 4.21 9.00 0.55 Winslow WaterWorks 2007 34 0 0.74 0.63 5.38 7.00 0.40 13.00 1.16 9.00 0.58 Winslow WaterWorks 2008 33 0 1.39 1.05 8.74 7.00 0.38 13.00 2.49 8.00 0.77 Winslow WaterWorks 2009 34 0 2.05 1.73 10.34 6.00 0.40 13.00 3.71 8.00 2.35 Winslow WaterWorks 2010 32 0 4.31 2.85 54.65 4.00 0.44 13.00 9.86 9.00 0.65 Winslow WaterWorks 2011 33 0 0.94 0.75 3.79 6.00 0.38 13.00 1.51 8.00 0.70 Altoona 2004 19 0 0.74 1.15 2.07 0.00 0.00 7.00 1.83 6.00 0.47 Altoona 2005 35 0 0.71 0.63 2.60 7.00 0.61 13.00 0.92 9.00 0.61 Altoona 2006 35 0 0.79 0.55 10.18 7.00 0.05 13.00 1.96 9.00 0.17 Altoona 2007 29 0 0.80 0.61 4.02 7.00 0.42 13.00 1.29 3.00 0.36 Altoona 2008 30 0 0.70 0.56 2.96 6.00 0.35 12.00 1.14 8.00 0.40 Altoona 2009 30 0 0.72 0.58 2.85 6.00 0.35 13.00 1.15 7.00 0.46 Atchison

Not enough

data for2003

Atchison 2004 33 0 0.92 0.74 3.31 6.00 0.37 13.00 1.51 8.00 0.75 Atchison 2005 32 0 1.14 0.87 6.93 6.00 0.44 13.00 1.90 8.00 0.75 Atchison 2006 34 0 0.29 0.21 4.82 6.00 0.07 13.00 0.63 9.00 0.07 Atchison 2007 35 0 1.23 0.98 6.99 7.00 0.45 13.00 2.42 9.00 0.65 Atchison 2008 32 0 1.39 1.04 7.93 7.00 0.44 12.00 2.62 8.00 0.66 
225 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Atchison 2009 34 0 1.05 0.83 9.70 6.00 0.39 13.00 2.05 8.00 0.51 Atchison 2010 34 0 1.35 1.06 4.74 6.00 0.44 13.00 2.45 9.00 0.87 Atchison 2011 124 0 1.09 0.71 5.41 6.00 0.43 83.00 1.27 29.00 0.60 Baxter Springs Water

Treatment Plant 2005 28 0 3.95 2.45 58.45 0.00 0.00 13.00 8.05 9.00 0.49 

Baxter Springs Water

Treatment Plant 2006 35 0 0.31 0.22 2.09 7.00 0.05 13.00 0.67 9.00 0.11 

Baxter Springs Water

Treatment Plant 2007 35 0 1.34 0.98 16.30 7.00 0.39 13.00 2.70 9.00 0.46 

Baxter Springs Water

Treatment Plant 2008 33 0 1.38 0.97 13.00 7.00 0.35 13.00 2.57 8.00 0.57 

Baxter Springs Water

Treatment Plant 2009 33 0 1.28 0.96 11.78 6.00 0.38 13.00 2.61 8.00 0.53 

Baxter Springs Water

Treatment Plant 2010 33 0 1.07 0.83 11.94 5.00 0.37 13.00 2.09 8.00 0.49 

Baxter Springs Water

Treatment Plant 2011 32 0 1.65 1.18 11.15 6.00 0.40 12.00 3.46 9.00 0.46 

Beloit WaterDepartment 2003 23 0 2.88 2.48 15.08 0.00 0.00 10.00 3.13 8.00 2.55 Beloit WaterDepartment 2004 33 0 2.01 2.03 3.63 6.00 2.18 13.00 1.74 8.00 2.46 Beloit WaterDepartment 2005 35 0 2.87 2.34 39.50 7.00 1.50 13.00 4.95 9.00 2.13 Beloit WaterDepartment 2006 34 0 0.69 0.66 2.40 7.00 0.68 13.00 0.69 8.00 0.90 Beloit WaterDepartment 2007 34 0 2.37 2.03 11.93 7.00 1.31 13.00 3.90 9.00 1.66 
226 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Beloit WaterDepartment 2008 29 0 3.21 2.57 23.11 5.00 1.75 12.00 4.31 7.00 2.14 Beloit WaterDepartment 2009 34 0 1.67 1.61 7.84 6.00 1.54 13.00 1.86 8.00 1.70 Beloit WaterDepartment 2010 34 0 2.03 1.90 6.17 6.00 1.57 13.00 2.31 9.00 2.34 Beloit WaterDepartment 2011 34 0 2.33 2.12 13.88 6.00 1.24 13.00 3.13 9.00 2.40 Burlington City WaterWorks 2003 23 0 2.65 2.92 4.91 0.00 0.00 9.00 3.19 8.00 3.06 Burlington City WaterWorks 2004 33 0 1.27 1.17 3.57 6.00 1.02 13.00 1.40 8.00 1.66 Burlington City WaterWorks 2005 35 0 1.26 1.05 5.55 7.00 0.54 13.00 1.95 9.00 1.22 Burlington City WaterWorks 2006 34 0 0.71 0.70 1.76 7.00 0.12 12.00 0.71 9.00 1.22 Burlington City WaterWorks 2007 32 0 1.10 1.00 2.86 6.00 0.67 13.00 1.49 7.00 1.12 Burlington City WaterWorks 2008 30 0 1.50 1.23 5.04 5.00 1.14 13.00 2.14 8.00 1.16 Burlington City WaterWorks 2009 33 0 0.93 0.79 2.36 6.00 0.60 13.00 1.06 8.00 1.02 Burlington City WaterWorks 2010 32 0 1.62 1.26 5.56 5.00 0.47 13.00 2.66 8.00 1.34 Burlington City WaterWorks 2011 32 0 1.52 1.42 2.94 4.00 0.70 13.00 1.34 9.00 2.10 Caney WaterTreatment Plant 2005 25 0 0.50 0.47 1.98 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.64 8.00 0.40 Caney WaterTreatment Plant 2006 34 0 0.56 0.40 8.92 6.00 0.05 13.00 1.24 9.00 0.26 Caney WaterTreatment Plant 2007 35 0 0.39 0.38 0.74 7.00 0.40 13.00 0.42 9.00 0.35 Caney WaterTreatment Plant 2008 28 0 0.40 0.39 0.71 6.00 0.35 12.00 0.42 8.00 0.42 Caney WaterTreatment Plant 2009 32 0 0.49 0.43 3.95 5.00 0.35 13.00 0.69 8.00 0.35 
227 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Caney WaterTreatment Plant 2010 22 0 0.49 0.43 1.94 4.00 0.37 12.00 0.59 3.00 0.37 Caney WaterTreatment Plant 2011 34 0 0.55 0.51 1.96 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.76 9.00 0.46 Chanute 2006 24 0 1.10 1.19 2.57 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.43 9.00 1.14 Chanute 2007 31 0 1.43 1.24 6.57 7.00 0.80 11.00 2.36 8.00 1.09 Chanute 2008 27 0 1.65 1.45 5.50 7.00 1.08 10.00 3.16 6.00 1.13 Chanute 2009 33 0 1.12 0.92 5.54 5.00 0.65 13.00 1.52 8.00 1.03 Chanute 2010 32 0 1.91 1.67 7.41 6.00 1.33 12.00 3.29 8.00 1.15 Chanute 2011 34 0 2.30 1.95 13.40 6.00 0.90 13.00 3.94 9.00 1.62 Chetopa 2007 18 0 2.07 1.27 6.15 0.00 0.00 12.00 2.47 4.00 1.18 Chetopa 2008 23 0 1.35 1.16 5.91 7.00 0.98 6.00 2.08 7.00 1.06 Chetopa 2009 28 0 1.16 0.91 3.63 6.00 0.49 11.00 1.68 7.00 1.08 Chetopa 2010 27 0 1.74 1.28 7.96 3.00 0.62 11.00 2.78 8.00 1.17 Chetopa 2011 30 0 1.75 1.59 7.02 4.00 0.79 10.00 2.99 10.00 1.43 City Of Carbondale 2003 25 0 2.09 1.99 4.87 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.25 8.00 2.47 City Of Carbondale 2004 27 0 1.43 1.59 3.46 5.00 2.49 12.00 1.42 4.00 1.41 City Of Carbondale 2005 35 0 2.76 2.53 7.81 7.00 0.63 13.00 3.29 9.00 3.94 City Of Carbondale 2006 35 0 1.77 1.75 2.88 7.00 1.54 13.00 1.93 9.00 2.00 City Of Carbondale 2007 33 0 2.72 2.70 4.29 7.00 1.91 12.00 3.07 8.00 2.88 City Of Carbondale 2008 29 0 3.43 3.01 6.22 6.00 3.09 13.00 4.33 7.00 2.60 City Of Carbondale 2009 7 0 2.43 2.62 3.01 6.00 2.30 1.00 2.73 0.00 0.00 City of Emporia 2003 26 0 1.52 1.09 3.58 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.17 8.00 2.53 City of Emporia 2004 33 0 0.90 0.73 2.97 6.00 0.48 13.00 1.21 8.00 0.89 City of Emporia 2005 35 0 0.99 0.84 4.23 7.00 0.60 13.00 1.41 9.00 0.91 
228 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

City of Emporia 2006 35 0 0.25 0.24 0.69 7.00 0.16 13.00 0.24 9.00 0.32 City of Emporia 2007 35 0 0.90 0.82 4.39 7.00 0.46 13.00 1.37 9.00 0.55 City of Emporia 2008 30 0 0.83 0.74 3.03 6.00 0.66 12.00 0.99 8.00 0.80 City of Emporia 2009 34 0 0.84 0.78 3.07 6.00 0.44 13.00 1.02 8.00 0.94 City of Emporia 2010 34 0 0.98 0.85 3.05 6.00 0.57 13.00 1.12 9.00 1.10 City of Emporia 2011 34 0 0.99 0.94 5.84 6.00 0.68 13.00 1.45 9.00 0.80 City of Osawatomie 2003 23 0 1.84 3.02 5.64 0.00 0.00 10.00 3.24 8.00 1.58 City of Osawatomie 2004 33 0 1.71 1.47 4.67 6.00 1.06 13.00 2.36 8.00 1.74 City of Osawatomie 2005 35 0 1.84 1.52 16.56 7.00 0.72 13.00 3.25 9.00 1.53 City of Osawatomie 2006 34 0 0.78 0.74 2.93 7.00 0.45 13.00 0.96 8.00 0.72 City of Osawatomie 2007 34 0 1.47 1.30 5.11 6.00 1.01 13.00 2.31 9.00 0.99 City of Osawatomie 2008 32 0 1.85 1.56 11.99 6.00 1.43 13.00 2.75 8.00 1.25 City of Osawatomie 2009 34 0 1.24 1.08 3.25 6.00 0.78 13.00 1.91 8.00 1.00 City of Osawatomie 2010 32 0 1.80 1.39 11.63 5.00 0.47 13.00 3.09 9.00 1.22 City of Osawatomie 2011 139 0 2.44 1.67 17.55 6.00 1.05 91.00 3.00 36.00 1.37 City of Valley Falls 2003 23 0 2.52 3.57 9.24 0.00 0.00 9.00 5.27 8.00 1.65 City of Valley Falls 2004 33 0 1.67 1.37 5.07 6.00 1.10 13.00 2.58 8.00 1.39 City of Valley Falls 2005 35 0 2.27 1.76 8.53 7.00 1.06 13.00 4.33 9.00 1.29 City of Valley Falls 2006 35 0 1.12 0.79 5.49 7.00 0.10 13.00 2.23 9.00 0.70 City of Valley Falls 2007 35 0 1.79 1.59 4.90 7.00 1.43 13.00 2.72 9.00 1.11 City of Valley Falls 2008 32 0 2.15 1.84 5.60 7.00 2.57 12.00 2.99 8.00 1.13 City of Valley Falls 2009 7 0 0.80 1.30 1.50 6.00 0.73 1.00 1.47 0.00 0.00 Coffeyville 2011 25 0 2.34 1.98 15.01 0.00 0.00 10.00 4.12 9.00 0.96 Ellsworth RWD #1 2003 22 0 1.61 1.39 4.74 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.92 8.00 2.18 
229 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Ellsworth RWD #1 2004 32 0 1.50 1.57 2.22 5.00 1.75 13.00 1.17 8.00 1.93 Ellsworth RWD #1 2005 34 0 0.97 0.97 1.71 7.00 1.24 13.00 0.89 8.00 1.23 Ellsworth RWD #1 2006 35 0 0.25 0.26 0.92 7.00 0.30 13.00 0.19 9.00 0.36 Ellsworth RWD #1 2007 31 0 1.11 1.12 2.10 7.00 0.63 11.00 1.10 9.00 1.30 Ellsworth RWD #1 2008 31 0 1.56 1.53 5.84 6.00 1.25 12.00 1.54 8.00 1.73 Ellsworth RWD #1 2009 32 0 0.88 0.90 1.15 6.00 1.04 13.00 0.84 7.00 0.92 Ellsworth RWD #1 2010 34 0 1.53 1.51 2.53 6.00 0.77 13.00 1.22 9.00 2.28 Ellsworth RWD #1 2011 34 0 1.37 1.37 1.69 6.00 1.42 13.00 1.29 9.00 1.50 Erie

Not enough

data for2003

Erie 2004 33 0 1.41 1.26 3.31 6.00 1.01 13.00 1.94 8.00 1.45 Erie 2005 35 0 1.40 1.14 6.50 7.00 0.56 13.00 2.35 9.00 1.22 Erie 2006 34 0 0.89 0.77 4.48 6.00 0.14 13.00 1.22 9.00 1.01 Erie 2007 33 0 1.59 1.35 6.03 7.00 0.78 13.00 2.67 8.00 1.18 Erie 2008 29 0 1.94 1.46 9.49 5.00 1.07 13.00 3.22 7.00 1.15 Erie 2009 34 0 1.03 0.82 2.58 6.00 0.54 13.00 1.37 8.00 0.88 Erie 2010 33 0 1.67 1.47 11.69 6.00 0.84 12.00 3.33 9.00 1.18 Erie 2011 34 0 1.95 1.68 14.11 6.00 0.87 13.00 3.13 9.00 1.64 Franklin County RWD

#6

Not enough

data for2003

Franklin County RWD

#6 2004 33 0 1.69 1.41 3.95 6.00 0.99 13.00 2.67 8.00 1.31 

Franklin County RWD

#6 2005 35 0 1.65 1.38 6.45 7.00 0.84 13.00 2.50 9.00 1.69 

Franklin County RWD

#6 2006 34 0 0.88 0.81 2.90 7.00 0.44 13.00 1.21 9.00 0.76 
230 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Franklin County RWD

#6 2007 34 0 0.96 0.93 1.62 7.00 0.81 13.00 1.07 8.00 1.03 

Franklin County RWD

#6 2008 31 0 1.32 1.15 3.45 6.00 0.91 13.00 1.29 8.00 1.67 

Franklin County RWD

#6 2009 33 0 0.94 0.84 2.48 6.00 0.65 13.00 1.20 7.00 0.92 

Franklin County RWD

#6 2010 32 0 1.25 1.14 3.13 6.00 0.60 13.00 1.57 7.00 1.34 

Franklin County RWD

#6 2011 32 0 1.60 1.46 8.23 6.00 1.13 11.00 2.01 9.00 1.44 

Harveyville 2006 22 0 0.95 1.00 1.47 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.99 7.00 1.18 Harveyville 2007 14 0 0.72 0.74 1.22 4.00 1.12 2.00 0.84 5.00 0.55 Harveyville 2008 5 0 0.41 0.37 0.53 5.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Herington 2011 25 0 1.24 1.24 1.44 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.28 9.00 1.28 Howard 2010 17 0 1.33 2.19 3.30 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.28 9.00 1.25 Howard 2011 31 0 0.65 0.64 0.92 5.00 0.78 11.00 0.68 10.00 0.58 Humboldt 2011 16 0 1.58 1.82 2.15 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.15 9.00 1.59 Iola 2009 22 0 1.30 2.55 5.31 1.00 5.31 7.00 3.43 8.00 1.00 Iola 2010 33 0 1.96 1.57 8.98 5.00 0.86 13.00 3.36 9.00 1.29 Iola 2011 137 0 2.17 1.73 10.87 4.00 0.83 91.00 2.49 36.00 1.54 Kansas City BD of

Public Utilities

Not enough

data for2003

Kansas City BD of

Public Utilities 2004 33 0 0.57 0.46 2.41 6.00 0.26 13.00 0.81 8.00 0.58 

Kansas City BD of

Public Utilities 2005 33 0 0.79 0.66 3.63 7.00 0.56 13.00 1.12 8.00 0.55 

Kansas City BD of

Public Utilities 2006 35 0 0.10 0.09 0.43 7.00 0.05 13.00 0.13 9.00 0.13 

Kansas City BD of

Public Utilities 2007 35 0 0.62 0.56 1.65 7.00 0.38 13.00 0.90 9.00 0.59 
231 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Kansas City BD of

Public Utilities 2008 32 0 0.73 0.59 2.33 6.00 0.35 13.00 0.89 8.00 0.72 

Kansas City BD of

Public Utilities 2009 28 0 0.60 0.51 1.36 5.00 0.35 10.00 0.75 8.00 0.58 

Kansas City BD of

Public Utilities 2010 34 0 0.61 0.54 1.60 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.75 9.00 0.64 

Kansas City BD of

Public Utilities 2011 33 0 0.47 0.44 0.77 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.52 9.00 0.51 

Kickapoo TribalWaterworks 2009 8 0 0.86 1.16 1.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.30 Kickapoo TribalWaterworks 2010 22 0 2.35 1.49 9.73 2.00 0.76 6.00 2.90 10.00 1.15 Kickapoo TribalWaterworks 2011 29 0 1.49 1.31 2.96 3.00 1.03 12.00 1.81 8.00 1.66 La Cygne 2006 24 0 1.30 1.45 3.82 0.00 0.00 9.00 2.26 9.00 0.76 La Cygne 2007 35 0 1.42 1.31 3.23 7.00 0.98 13.00 2.19 8.00 1.15 La Cygne 2008 29 0 1.96 1.60 5.35 7.00 1.36 13.00 2.62 7.00 1.53 La Cygne 2009 32 0 1.56 1.34 3.61 4.00 1.21 13.00 2.15 8.00 1.29 La Cygne 2010 34 0 2.01 1.79 4.88 6.00 0.73 13.00 2.80 9.00 1.41 La Cygne 2011 34 0 2.11 1.93 6.15 6.00 1.97 13.00 2.89 9.00 1.63 LeRoy

Not enough

data for2007

Linn Valley Lakes POA 2003 22 0 1.01 1.02 1.25 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.90 6.00 1.10 Linn Valley Lakes POA 2004 33 0 0.69 0.73 1.34 6.00 1.08 13.00 0.60 8.00 0.72 Linn Valley Lakes POA 2005 33 0 0.50 0.49 1.26 5.00 0.52 13.00 0.53 9.00 0.56 Linn Valley Lakes POA 2006 17 0 0.16 0.38 0.55 7.00 0.14 10.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 Linn Valley Lakes POA 2007 22 0 0.52 0.45 0.69 7.00 0.55 12.00 0.53 3.00 0.36 Linn Valley Lakes POA 2008 10 0 0.43 0.43 0.62 5.00 0.44 3.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 Linn Valley Lakes POA 2009 10 0 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 
232 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Linn Valley Lakes POA 2010 35 0 1.23 1.15 2.57 6.00 0.37 13.00 1.31 9.00 1.62 Linn Valley Lakes POA 2011 34 0 0.95 0.96 1.20 6.00 1.08 13.00 0.96 9.00 0.89 Marais Des CygnesPublic Utility

Authority 2011 17 0 1.52 2.22 3.11 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.01 9.00 1.34 

Miami Co. RWD #2 2003 21 0 2.29 1.65 3.46 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.35 7.00 2.93 Miami Co. RWD #2 2004 32 0 1.73 1.80 2.65 5.00 2.22 13.00 1.47 8.00 2.08 Miami Co. RWD #2 2005 35 0 1.91 1.79 5.18 7.00 1.16 13.00 1.62 9.00 2.97 Miami Co. RWD #2 2006 32 0 1.42 1.45 2.97 7.00 1.20 12.00 1.05 9.00 2.14 Miami Co. RWD #2 2007 34 0 1.39 1.36 2.41 7.00 1.45 12.00 1.48 9.00 1.35 Miami Co. RWD #2 2008 31 0 1.28 1.38 2.75 6.00 1.32 13.00 1.16 8.00 1.38 Miami Co. RWD #2 2009 27 0 1.70 1.45 2.73 6.00 0.95 6.00 0.96 8.00 2.20 Miami Co. RWD #2 2010 34 0 2.09 1.89 7.30 6.00 1.13 13.00 2.71 9.00 2.15 Miami Co. RWD #2 2011 34 0 1.88 1.88 2.50 6.00 1.52 13.00 1.67 9.00 2.27 Milford

Not enough

data for2003

Milford 2004 33 0 2.37 2.34 3.09 6.00 1.92 13.00 2.26 8.00 2.66 Milford 2005 35 0 2.14 2.03 4.76 7.00 1.91 13.00 2.34 9.00 2.80 Milford 2006 35 0 0.79 0.79 2.29 7.00 0.76 13.00 0.57 9.00 1.09 Milford 2007 35 0 1.59 1.56 2.56 7.00 1.27 13.00 1.78 9.00 1.44 Milford 2008 33 0 1.93 1.93 3.53 7.00 1.81 13.00 1.78 8.00 2.11 Milford 2009 33 0 1.73 1.74 2.35 6.00 1.66 13.00 1.67 8.00 1.83 Milford 2010 35 0 1.82 1.69 8.50 7.00 0.75 13.00 2.26 9.00 2.16 Milford 2011 35 0 1.55 1.44 6.12 7.00 0.83 13.00 1.82 9.00 1.69 Mitchell Co. RWD #2 2003 23 0 2.73 3.02 3.57 0.00 0.00 9.00 2.73 8.00 3.01 
233 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Mitchell Co. RWD #2 2004 33 0 2.28 2.27 3.09 6.00 2.54 13.00 2.19 8.00 2.50 Mitchell Co. RWD #2 2005 35 0 1.87 1.73 3.60 7.00 1.84 13.00 1.93 9.00 2.22 Mitchell Co. RWD #2 2006 32 0 0.92 0.93 2.65 7.00 1.30 11.00 0.73 8.00 1.10 Mitchell Co. RWD #2 2007 32 0 1.55 1.55 2.08 6.00 1.25 11.00 1.50 9.00 1.64 Mitchell Co. RWD #2 2008 32 0 2.10 2.04 3.75 6.00 1.79 13.00 2.00 8.00 2.29 Mitchell Co. RWD #2 2009 35 0 1.63 1.66 2.06 6.00 1.64 13.00 1.49 9.00 1.75 Mitchell Co. RWD #2 2010 35 0 1.78 1.76 3.70 6.00 1.62 14.00 1.60 9.00 2.33 Mitchell Co. RWD #2 2011 33 0 1.89 1.84 2.76 6.00 1.27 12.00 1.68 9.00 2.38 Neodesha 2011 26 0 0.65 0.54 3.34 0.00 0.00 11.00 0.91 9.00 0.42 Olathe‐‐ Composite of

Collector Wells 2003 25 0 1.77 1.35 2.85 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.60 8.00 1.67 

Olathe‐‐ Composite of

Collector Wells 2004 32 0 1.18 1.18 1.85 5.00 1.37 13.00 1.18 8.00 1.32 

Olathe‐‐ Composite of

Collector Wells 2005 32 0 0.61 0.57 2.06 6.00 0.07 12.00 0.88 8.00 0.77 

Olathe‐‐ Composite of

Collector Wells 2006 32 0 0.63 0.60 2.51 7.00 0.24 12.00 0.70 8.00 1.02 

Olathe‐‐ Composite of

Collector Wells 2007 33 0 0.94 0.94 1.47 7.00 0.84 11.00 0.93 9.00 1.14 

Olathe‐‐ Composite of

Collector Wells 2008 29 0 1.02 1.03 1.43 6.00 1.16 12.00 0.96 7.00 1.21 

Olathe‐‐ Composite of

Collector Wells 2009 33 0 0.84 0.84 1.37 6.00 0.89 13.00 0.75 8.00 0.96 
234 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Olathe‐‐ Composite of

Collector Wells 2010 34 0 1.36 1.18 7.43 5.00 0.80 13.00 2.14 10.00 1.06 

Olathe‐‐ Composite of

Collector Wells 2011 33 0 0.94 0.95 2.01 6.00 0.82 13.00 0.93 8.00 1.06 

Olathe‐‐ WP1 2003 6 0 3.80 4.23 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 3.59 Olathe‐‐ WP1 2004 8 0 2.98 2.79 4.42 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.66 7.00 3.09 Olathe‐‐ WP1 2005 17 0 3.00 2.35 6.98 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.17 6.00 3.32 Olathe‐‐River 2003 26 0 2.35 1.85 4.57 0.00 0.00 12.00 2.49 8.00 1.90 Olathe‐‐River 2004 33 0 1.39 1.41 4.63 6.00 1.83 13.00 1.43 8.00 1.51 Olathe‐‐River 2005 30 0 1.49 1.21 3.85 5.00 0.85 12.00 2.07 9.00 1.31 Olathe‐‐River 2006 33 0 0.64 0.59 2.35 7.00 0.28 12.00 0.75 9.00 0.79 Olathe‐‐River 2007 33 0 1.37 1.33 2.79 6.00 0.93 12.00 1.56 9.00 1.62 Olathe‐‐River 2008 32 0 1.66 1.56 4.21 6.00 1.40 13.00 1.78 8.00 1.60 Olathe‐‐River 2009 33 0 1.43 1.29 4.23 6.00 1.10 13.00 1.96 8.00 1.23 Olathe‐‐River 2010 35 0 1.40 1.30 4.02 6.00 0.79 13.00 1.57 10.00 1.71 Olathe‐‐River 2011 32 0 1.31 1.26 4.39 4.00 1.19 13.00 1.56 9.00 1.06 Osage Co RWD #3 2003 26 0 1.43 1.54 5.32 0.00 0.00 12.00 1.12 8.00 1.84 Osage Co RWD #3 2004 33 0 2.02 1.90 2.95 6.00 1.61 13.00 2.29 8.00 2.21 Osage Co RWD #3 2005 35 0 2.18 1.88 17.40 7.00 1.00 13.00 3.02 9.00 2.54 Osage Co RWD #3 2006 33 0 1.49 1.39 3.73 7.00 0.70 12.00 1.71 8.00 1.72 Osage Co RWD #3 2007 34 0 1.82 1.72 4.36 6.00 1.83 13.00 2.33 9.00 1.43 Osage Co RWD #3 2008 29 0 1.82 1.72 4.03 3.00 2.16 13.00 2.20 8.00 1.53 Osage Co RWD #3 2009 34 0 1.79 1.66 5.66 6.00 1.51 13.00 2.40 8.00 1.59 Osage Co RWD #3 2010 33 0 2.51 2.08 8.13 6.00 0.70 12.00 4.00 9.00 1.98 
235 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Osage Co RWD #3 2011 34 0 2.02 1.97 3.53 6.00 2.01 13.00 2.11 9.00 2.05 Oswego 2009 20 0 1.25 0.98 4.65 0.00 0.00 5.00 1.31 8.00 1.00 Oswego 2010 33 0 1.92 1.49 9.51 5.00 0.67 13.00 3.65 9.00 1.10 Oswego 2011 34 0 2.35 1.92 15.81 6.00 0.79 13.00 4.37 9.00 1.63 Paola

Not enough

data for2003

Paola 2004 33 0 0.69 0.71 1.09 6.00 0.90 13.00 0.60 8.00 0.79 Paola 2005 35 0 1.33 1.20 3.33 7.00 0.61 13.00 1.29 9.00 2.12 Paola 2006 35 0 0.54 0.56 0.92 7.00 0.71 13.00 0.49 9.00 0.53 Paola 2007 33 0 1.05 1.02 1.60 7.00 0.73 13.00 1.22 7.00 1.13 Paola 2008 31 0 0.85 0.81 1.33 6.00 0.82 13.00 0.92 8.00 0.83 Paola 2009 22 0 1.37 1.40 2.40 5.00 0.65 13.00 1.47 4.00 1.76 Public WholesaleWSD #12 2003 26 0 2.38 2.21 5.18 0.00 0.00 12.00 1.88 8.00 3.37 Public WholesaleWSD #12 2004 33 0 1.57 1.60 3.21 6.00 1.83 13.00 1.43 8.00 1.76 Public WholesaleWSD #12 2005 35 0 1.49 1.38 3.75 7.00 1.05 13.00 1.43 9.00 2.15 Public WholesaleWSD #12 2006 34 0 0.86 0.92 1.49 7.00 0.76 13.00 0.71 9.00 1.11 Public WholesaleWSD #12 2007 32 0 1.33 1.27 2.11 7.00 1.25 12.00 1.55 8.00 1.15 Public WholesaleWSD #12 2008 29 0 1.25 1.22 1.92 6.00 1.02 12.00 1.05 8.00 1.67 Public WholesaleWSD #12 2009 34 0 1.00 0.99 1.34 5.00 0.94 13.00 0.96 9.00 1.09 Public WholesaleWSD #12 2010 33 0 1.63 1.50 4.78 5.00 0.80 13.00 1.82 9.00 1.99 Public WholesaleWSD #12 2011 34 0 1.43 1.44 1.89 6.00 1.29 13.00 1.30 9.00 1.62 
236 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Public WholesaleWSD #5

Not enough

data for2003

Public WholesaleWSD #5 2004 33 0 1.35 1.23 2.76 6.00 1.05 13.00 1.70 8.00 1.29 Public WholesaleWSD #5 2005 34 0 1.35 1.04 5.23 7.00 0.42 13.00 1.95 9.00 1.31 Public WholesaleWSD #5 2006 34 0 0.63 0.61 2.04 7.00 0.11 13.00 0.67 8.00 0.98 Public WholesaleWSD #5 2007 33 0 1.02 0.96 2.87 7.00 0.90 12.00 1.34 8.00 0.97 Public WholesaleWSD #5 2008 31 0 1.39 1.12 4.61 6.00 1.20 13.00 2.05 8.00 0.88 Public WholesaleWSD #5 2009 31 0 0.88 0.80 2.02 5.00 0.55 13.00 1.05 6.00 1.20 Public WholesaleWSD #5 2010 33 0 1.54 1.28 5.02 5.00 0.55 13.00 2.42 9.00 1.43 Public WholesaleWSD #5 2011 34 0 1.56 1.49 5.46 6.00 0.76 13.00 1.67 9.00 1.51 Richmond

Not enough

data for2003

Richmond 2004 32 0 3.13 2.80 7.22 6.00 1.19 13.00 3.75 8.00 3.58 Richmond 2005 32 0 1.96 1.58 7.74 6.00 1.16 12.00 2.74 9.00 1.71 Richmond 2006 33 0 0.72 0.70 2.69 7.00 0.50 13.00 0.72 7.00 0.90 Richmond 2007 28 0 0.61 0.61 1.04 5.00 0.87 12.00 0.65 7.00 0.46 Richmond 2008 23 0 4.08 2.58 20.56 2.00 0.35 12.00 4.33 7.00 4.50 Richmond 2009 31 0 0.49 0.50 0.77 5.00 0.72 12.00 0.48 8.00 0.44 Richmond 2010 33 0 2.31 1.84 6.60 5.00 0.37 13.00 3.65 9.00 2.00 Richmond 2011 30 0 2.82 2.71 5.73 4.00 1.22 12.00 2.94 8.00 3.82 Salina 2007 25 0 1.12 0.98 2.15 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.09 9.00 1.08 Salina 2008 28 0 1.40 1.34 3.12 5.00 0.87 12.00 1.60 6.00 1.57 
237 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Salina 2009 34 0 0.96 0.88 6.13 6.00 0.76 13.00 1.25 8.00 0.83 Salina 2010 34 0 1.37 1.28 5.78 6.00 0.47 13.00 1.28 9.00 2.12 Salina 2011 34 0 1.19 1.10 9.30 6.00 0.72 13.00 1.71 9.00 1.13 Spring Hill 2004 6 0 6.87 5.04 10.49 0.00 0.00 6.00 4.20 0.00 0.00 St. Paul

Not enough

data for2003

St. Paul 2004 33 0 1.48 1.37 3.91 6.00 1.30 13.00 1.88 8.00 1.57 St. Paul 2005 35 0 1.46 1.17 9.31 7.00 0.45 13.00 2.65 9.00 1.16 St. Paul 2006 35 0 0.90 0.76 5.66 7.00 0.11 13.00 1.41 9.00 0.89 St. Paul 2007 33 0 1.64 1.38 6.23 7.00 0.98 13.00 2.74 8.00 1.04 St. Paul 2008 27 0 1.68 1.35 5.88 5.00 1.10 11.00 2.61 8.00 1.08 St. Paul 2009 32 0 0.71 0.62 2.71 6.00 0.54 12.00 1.13 8.00 0.45 St. Paul 2010 33 0 0.54 0.49 4.64 6.00 0.42 13.00 0.76 8.00 0.38 St. Paul 2011 33 0 1.22 1.04 11.41 6.00 0.62 12.00 1.96 9.00 0.67 Topeka WaterTreatment Plant 2003 26 0 1.79 1.63 5.18 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.64 8.00 1.92 Topeka WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 1.57 1.58 4.04 6.00 1.72 13.00 1.52 8.00 1.72 Topeka WaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 1.55 1.37 6.68 7.00 1.30 13.00 2.23 9.00 1.51 Topeka WaterTreatment Plant 2006 35 0 0.93 0.76 5.48 7.00 0.41 13.00 0.93 9.00 1.18 Topeka WaterTreatment Plant 2007 35 0 1.40 1.36 2.67 7.00 1.07 13.00 1.47 9.00 1.70 Topeka WaterTreatment Plant 2008 29 0 1.75 1.52 5.58 6.00 1.05 13.00 2.01 7.00 1.78 Topeka WaterTreatment Plant 2009 23 0 1.30 1.45 2.37 6.00 1.17 6.00 1.31 8.00 1.34 Leitchfield Water 2003 27 0 2.06 1.41 4.08 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.04 8.00 2.85 
238 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

WorksLeitchfield WaterWorks 2004 33 0 2.37 2.01 5.46 6.00 0.30 13.00 3.08 8.00 3.66 Leitchfield WaterWorks 2005 35 0 1.87 1.62 5.48 7.00 0.61 13.00 2.32 9.00 2.90 Leitchfield WaterWorks 2006 34 0 0.82 0.82 9.27 7.00 0.05 12.00 0.77 9.00 0.96 Leitchfield WaterWorks 2007 28 0 1.10 0.99 2.79 7.00 0.39 8.00 1.29 7.00 1.83 Leitchfield WaterWorks 2008 29 0 1.41 1.16 4.55 6.00 0.35 11.00 1.65 8.00 1.74 Leitchfield WaterWorks 2009 33 0 1.16 1.00 2.95 6.00 0.37 12.00 1.55 8.00 1.64 Leitchfield WaterWorks 2010 34 0 2.40 1.99 6.93 5.00 0.37 13.00 3.56 9.00 2.69 Leitchfield WaterWorks 2011 34 0 1.16 1.04 3.23 6.00 0.38 13.00 1.28 9.00 1.69 Livermore 2006 23 0 0.87 1.18 3.40 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.78 9.00 0.61 Livermore 2007 32 0 0.95 1.04 6.24 4.00 0.36 9.00 2.37 7.00 0.79 Livermore 2008 30 0 1.38 1.19 6.98 6.00 0.36 13.00 2.27 6.00 0.67 Livermore 2009 28 0 1.32 1.01 14.39 5.00 0.35 9.00 2.31 4.00 0.85 Livermore 2010 30 0 2.11 1.77 8.52 5.00 0.47 12.00 3.42 5.00 1.44 Livermore 2011 36 0 1.26 1.13 8.43 7.00 0.64 10.00 1.60 7.00 1.29 Livermore 1899 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Livermore 2006 23 0 0.84 1.17 3.40 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.75 9.00 0.58 Livermore (Green

River)

Not enoughdata for2007

Livermore (Green

River)

Not enoughdata for2008

Marion Water 2003 27 0 0.87 0.85 1.42 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.02 8.00 0.83 
239 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Treatment PlantMarion WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 2.20 2.03 4.04 6.00 0.46 13.00 2.43 8.00 3.29 Marion WaterTreatment Plant‐‐Lake

George 2005 35 0 0.63 0.62 1.33 7.00 0.70 13.00 0.50 9.00 0.72 

Marion WaterTreatment Plant‐‐Lake

George 2006 35 0 0.10 0.10 0.33 7.00 0.10 13.00 0.09 9.00 0.14 

Marion WaterTreatment Plant‐‐Lake

George 2007 35 0 0.36 0.36 0.45 7.00 0.38 13.00 0.35 9.00 0.35 

Marion WaterTreatment Plant‐‐Lake

George 2008 28 0 0.35 0.35 0.35 3.00 0.35 13.00 0.35 7.00 0.35 

Marion WaterTreatment Plant‐‐Lake

George 2009 6 0 0.35 0.35 0.35 6.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Marion WaterTreatment Plant‐‐Old

Lake 2005 21 0 0.91 0.67 2.46 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.90 9.00 0.80 

Marion WaterTreatment Plant‐‐Old

Lake 2006 35 0 0.07 0.06 0.25 7.00 0.05 13.00 0.09 9.00 0.06 

Marion WaterTreatment Plant‐‐Old

Lake 2007 35 0 0.80 0.74 1.90 7.00 0.38 13.00 0.90 9.00 1.05 

Marion WaterTreatment Plant‐‐Old

Lake 2008 29 0 0.40 0.38 0.70 4.00 0.35 13.00 0.45 7.00 0.37 

Marion WaterTreatment Plant‐‐Old

Lake 2009 6 0 0.35 0.35 0.35 6.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Webster Co WaterDistrict 2003 27 0 1.61 1.55 3.93 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.41 8.00 1.12 
240 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Webster Co WaterDistrict 2004 33 0 1.49 1.14 5.79 6.00 0.28 13.00 2.54 8.00 1.25 Webster Co WaterDistrict 2005 36 0 1.43 1.16 4.29 8.00 0.61 13.00 2.16 9.00 1.31 Webster Co WaterDistrict 2006 35 0 0.87 0.75 3.68 7.00 0.16 13.00 1.49 9.00 0.80 Webster Co WaterDistrict 2007 35 0 1.45 1.17 5.69 7.00 0.38 13.00 2.53 9.00 0.96 Webster Co WaterDistrict 2008 31 0 1.52 1.16 5.64 5.00 0.36 13.00 2.52 8.00 0.91 Webster Co WaterDistrict 2009 32 0 1.33 0.95 11.24 6.00 0.35 12.00 2.30 7.00 0.71 Webster Co WaterDistrict 2010 32 0 1.38 1.15 8.68 5.00 0.56 12.00 2.58 9.00 0.66 Webster Co WaterDistrict 2011 33 0 1.12 0.96 5.41 6.00 0.42 12.00 1.65 9.00 0.95 E. Jefferson Water

Works Dist. #1 2003 29 0 0.94 0.66 2.95 0.00 0.00 7.00 1.06 14.00 1.07 

E. Jefferson Water

Works Dist. #1 2004 46 0 0.98 0.93 3.62 9.00 0.48 13.00 1.60 13.00 1.29 

E. Jefferson Water

Works Dist. #1 2005 37 0 0.90 0.78 3.29 8.00 0.43 13.00 1.04 8.00 1.24 

E. Jefferson Water

Works Dist. #1 2006 46 0 0.34 0.33 2.41 9.00 0.06 13.00 0.62 13.00 0.45 

E. Jefferson Water

Works Dist. #1 2007 44 0 0.78 0.75 1.79 8.00 0.56 13.00 0.96 13.00 0.92 

E. Jefferson Water

Works Dist. #1 2008 44 0 0.71 0.69 2.17 10.00 0.63 13.00 0.87 12.00 0.77 

E. Jefferson Water

Works Dist. #1 2009 46 0 0.64 0.64 1.05 9.00 0.63 13.00 0.81 13.00 0.65 

E. Jefferson Water

Works Dist. #1 2010 45 0 0.79 0.75 3.07 8.00 0.49 13.00 1.23 13.00 0.78 

E. Jefferson Water

Works Dist. #1 2011 45 0 0.66 0.64 1.17 8.00 0.52 13.00 0.80 13.00 0.76 

Iberville Water

District #3 2004 46 0 2.04 1.98 12.68 9.00 2.44 13.00 2.30 13.00 1.85 
241 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Iberville Water

District #3 2005 43 0 2.39 2.23 14.16 9.00 4.11 13.00 2.65 10.00 1.35 

Iberville Water

District #3 2006 46 0 0.79 0.87 8.85 9.00 1.71 13.00 0.86 13.00 0.74 

Iberville Water

District #3 2007 46 0 1.28 1.20 5.71 9.00 0.61 13.00 2.35 13.00 1.12 

Iberville Water

District #3 2008 41 0 1.08 0.98 5.34 9.00 0.64 13.00 1.80 11.00 0.88 

Iberville Water

District #3 2009 44 0 0.82 0.77 4.31 9.00 0.89 13.00 1.04 11.00 0.73 

Iberville Water

District #3 2010 43 0 0.85 0.79 4.03 8.00 0.41 11.00 1.28 13.00 1.00 

Iberville Water

District #3 2011 45 0 0.80 0.80 1.86 8.00 0.77 13.00 1.02 13.00 0.91 

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #37

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #38

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #39

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #40

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #41

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #42

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #43

Not enough

data for2007
242 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #44

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #45

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #46

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #47

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #48

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #49

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #50

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #51

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #52

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #53

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #54

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #55

Not enough

data for2007
243 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #56

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #57

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #58

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #59

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #60

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #61

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #62

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #63

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #64

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #65

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #66

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #67

Not enough

data for2007
244 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #68

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #69

Not enough

data for2007

Iberville Water

District #3, Baton

Rough District #70

Not enough

data for2007

LaFourche Water Dist.

#1 2003 34 0 1.27 1.45 3.58 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.98 12.00 0.99 

LaFourche Water Dist.

#1 2004 44 0 1.25 1.16 3.31 8.00 0.61 13.00 1.57 12.00 1.50 

LaFourche Water Dist.

#1 2005 43 0 1.41 1.27 6.86 9.00 1.26 13.00 2.02 10.00 1.22 

LaFourche Water Dist.

#1 2006 46 0 0.50 0.47 3.23 9.00 0.19 13.00 0.92 13.00 0.65 

LaFourche Water Dist.

#1 2007 45 0 0.96 0.90 4.86 9.00 0.64 13.00 1.07 13.00 1.36 

LaFourche Water Dist.

#1 2008 43 0 0.97 0.91 4.90 10.00 0.57 13.00 1.38 11.00 1.10 

LaFourche Water Dist.

#1 2009 40 0 1.49 1.28 26.20 9.00 2.60 13.00 1.38 8.00 0.73 

LaFourche Water Dist.

#1 2010 44 0 1.17 1.17 5.52 7.00 0.73 13.00 1.28 13.00 1.20 

LaFourche Water Dist.

#1 2011 44 0 1.07 0.98 9.41 8.00 0.71 13.00 1.71 12.00 1.06 

Thibodaux Water

Works 2008 43 0 1.14 1.06 10.49 10.00 0.68 13.00 1.98 11.00 1.00 

Thibodaux Water

Works 2009 10 0 0.94 0.94 3.16 9.00 0.74 1.00 1.05 0.00 0.00 

Thibodeaux WaterWorks 2003 36 0 1.29 1.37 4.87 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.31 12.00 0.97 Thibodeaux WaterWorks 2004 46 0 1.09 1.03 2.99 9.00 0.62 13.00 1.81 13.00 1.20 Thibodeaux WaterWorks 2005 42 0 1.70 1.36 36.13 9.00 0.58 13.00 3.38 9.00 1.04 
245 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Thibodeaux WaterWorks 2006 46 0 0.49 0.44 5.06 9.00 0.13 13.00 1.02 13.00 0.54 Thibodeaux WaterWorks 2007 46 0 0.76 0.73 1.79 9.00 0.57 13.00 0.91 13.00 0.96 Brazosport Water

Authority 2003 24 0 0.92 1.13 1.95 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.18 5.00 0.82 

Brazosport Water

Authority 2004 34 0 1.17 1.03 3.02 8.00 1.57 13.00 1.38 7.00 0.76 

Brazosport Water

Authority

Not enough

data for2005

Brazosport Water

Authority 2006 34 0 0.25 0.21 1.01 9.00 0.21 13.00 0.40 7.00 0.18 

Brazosport Water

Authority 2007 28 0 1.09 0.94 5.35 9.00 0.83 11.00 1.11 5.00 0.56 

Brazosport Water

Authority 2008 24 0 1.36 0.89 7.46 7.00 0.91 12.00 1.77 3.00 0.47 

Brazosport Water

Authority 2009 32 0 1.20 0.96 7.79 9.00 0.62 10.00 2.12 6.00 0.52 

Brazosport Water

Authority 2010 32 0 0.66 0.59 1.34 7.00 0.50 12.00 0.89 9.00 0.53 

Brazosport Water

Authority 2011 35 0 0.71 0.68 4.48 9.00 1.25 13.00 0.57 7.00 0.42 

Bucklin Water

Department 2003 23 0 1.50 1.53 2.35 0.00 0.00 12.00 1.67 7.00 1.63 

Bucklin Water

Department 2004 33 0 1.62 1.58 4.03 6.00 0.79 13.00 1.30 8.00 2.91 

Bucklin Water

Department 2005 31 0 0.72 0.71 1.03 6.00 0.86 12.00 0.69 8.00 0.89 

Bucklin Water

Department 2006 32 0 0.19 0.20 0.57 7.00 0.21 11.00 0.17 8.00 0.23 

Bucklin Water

Department 2007 30 0 1.00 0.97 2.07 6.00 0.44 11.00 1.16 7.00 1.34 

Bucklin Water

Department 2008 25 0 0.87 0.79 2.42 4.00 0.77 9.00 0.58 7.00 1.25 

Bucklin Water

Department 2009 7 0 0.43 0.40 0.48 6.00 0.44 1.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 
246 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Cameron Light &Power 2003 23 0 3.29 2.63 4.76 0.00 0.00 8.00 2.10 9.00 4.04 Cameron Light &Power 2004 33 0 1.84 1.92 2.94 6.00 2.50 13.00 1.41 8.00 2.32 Cameron Light &Power 2005 35 0 1.23 1.18 2.78 7.00 0.93 13.00 1.02 9.00 2.00 Cameron Light &Power 2006 35 0 0.78 0.80 2.07 7.00 0.49 13.00 0.63 9.00 1.08 Cameron Light &Power 2007 36 0 1.07 1.19 2.05 7.00 1.16 13.00 0.91 10.00 1.09 Cameron Light &Power 2008 28 0 1.68 1.60 2.65 5.00 2.02 11.00 1.97 7.00 1.52 Cameron Light &Power 2009 34 0 1.51 1.31 5.97 6.00 0.55 13.00 1.84 8.00 2.20 Cameron Light &Power 2010 34 0 1.29 1.12 5.13 6.00 0.41 13.00 1.74 9.00 1.34 Cameron Light &Power 2011 35 0 2.65 2.20 8.74 6.00 0.82 14.00 3.61 9.00 2.45 Clarence CannonWWC 2003 26 0 1.38 1.71 3.19 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.00 7.00 2.28 Clarence CannonWWC 2004 33 0 1.44 1.32 5.18 6.00 0.81 13.00 1.64 8.00 1.94 Clarence CannonWWC 2005 35 0 1.86 1.75 4.23 7.00 0.57 13.00 1.84 9.00 2.75 Clarence CannonWWC 2006 30 0 1.90 1.87 9.22 7.00 1.37 13.00 1.92 9.00 2.16 Concordia Water

Treatment Plant 2003 25 0 2.51 2.16 5.68 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.19 7.00 3.27 

Concordia Water

Treatment Plant 2004 31 0 2.76 2.51 5.87 6.00 1.32 12.00 2.78 7.00 3.62 

Concordia Water

Treatment Plant 2005 32 0 1.76 1.59 4.62 7.00 1.46 11.00 1.51 9.00 2.39 

Concordia Water

Treatment Plant 2006 28 0 1.31 1.33 2.66 6.00 0.71 11.00 1.30 7.00 1.86 

Concordia Water

Treatment Plant 2007 24 0 2.66 2.47 4.84 4.00 1.98 10.00 3.02 6.00 2.67 
247 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Concordia Water

Treatment Plant 2008 20 0 2.35 1.90 8.91 3.00 1.73 10.00 1.82 5.00 2.69 

Concordia Water

Treatment Plant 2009 26 0 2.65 2.50 6.78 6.00 1.53 9.00 3.64 6.00 2.98 

Concordia Water

Treatment Plant 2010 30 0 2.62 2.04 8.97 3.00 0.84 12.00 3.92 9.00 2.32 

Concordia Water

Treatment Plant 2011 33 0 2.56 2.26 6.40 6.00 1.10 12.00 3.00 9.00 2.85 

Creighton

Not enough

data for2003

Creighton 2004 32 0 1.24 0.96 4.50 6.00 0.61 12.00 1.33 8.00 1.56 Creighton 2005 35 0 0.42 0.44 0.65 7.00 0.57 13.00 0.32 9.00 0.46 Creighton 2006 5 0 0.05 0.05 0.05 5.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Dearborn WaterTreatment Plant 2003 15 0 2.18 3.86 7.04 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.31 2.00 6.86 Drexel 2006 23 0 1.89 2.02 4.01 0.00 0.00 10.00 2.34 8.00 1.77 Drexel 2007 32 0 1.33 1.14 2.70 6.00 1.28 13.00 2.17 8.00 0.58 Drexel 2008 33 0 0.40 0.40 0.76 7.00 0.43 13.00 0.38 8.00 0.38 Drexel 2009 34 0 1.92 1.92 4.61 6.00 0.36 13.00 0.99 8.00 3.94 Drexel 2010 31 0 6.74 4.74 32.56 5.00 1.42 11.00 12.59 9.00 2.83 Drexel 2011 4 0 1.93 1.63 2.15 4.00 1.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Drexel 1899 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Drexel 2010 31 0 6.74 4.74 32.56 5.00 1.42 11.00 12.59 9.00 2.83 Drexel 2011 4 0 1.93 1.63 2.15 4.00 1.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hannibal Water

Treatment 2003 21 0 1.24 1.31 3.23 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.82 7.00 1.03 

Hannibal Water

Treatment 2004 32 0 1.34 1.04 4.30 6.00 0.42 12.00 2.03 8.00 1.32 

Hannibal Water 2005 34 0 1.43 1.16 9.30 7.00 0.44 13.00 2.60 7.00 1.13 
248 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

TreatmentHannibal Water

Treatment 2008 31 0 1.34 1.01 8.71 6.00 0.43 13.00 2.08 7.00 1.05 

Hannibal Water

Treatment Plant 2006 35 0 0.23 0.20 1.28 7.00 0.05 13.00 0.36 9.00 0.21 

Hannibal Water

Treatment Plant 2007 33 0 1.20 0.99 5.68 7.00 0.42 12.00 2.13 9.00 0.90 

Hannibal Water

Treatment Plant 2009 5 0 0.45 0.42 0.52 5.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Harrison CountyPWSD #1 2006 22 0 1.88 1.80 2.94 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.62 9.00 2.14 Harrison CountyPWSD #1 2007 31 0 1.79 1.76 2.32 7.00 1.91 12.00 1.71 8.00 1.73 Harrison CountyPWSD #1 2008 27 0 1.08 1.18 1.61 1.00 1.61 13.00 1.13 8.00 1.10 Harrison CountyPWSD #1 2009 34 0 0.85 0.85 1.07 6.00 0.90 13.00 0.86 8.00 0.81 Harrison CountyPWSD #1

Not enough

data for2010

Jamesport WaterTreatment Plant 2003 27 0 2.05 1.99 2.78 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.09 8.00 2.37 Jamesport WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 0.86 0.85 2.18 6.00 0.97 13.00 0.73 8.00 1.16 Jamesport WaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 1.39 1.28 4.72 7.00 0.42 13.00 0.88 9.00 2.80 Jamesport WaterTreatment Plant 2006 35 0 0.71 0.69 1.34 7.00 0.52 13.00 0.74 9.00 0.87 Jamesport WaterTreatment Plant 2007 35 0 1.47 1.46 3.20 7.00 0.78 13.00 1.35 9.00 2.24 
249 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Jamesport WaterTreatment Plant 2008 32 0 0.76 0.72 2.65 6.00 1.02 13.00 0.98 8.00 0.50 Jamesport WaterTreatment Plant 2009 7 0 0.35 0.35 0.35 6.00 0.35 1.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 King City 2010 19 0 0.69 0.79 0.93 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.91 10.00 0.70 King City 2011 34 0 0.62 0.61 0.71 6.00 0.60 13.00 0.61 9.00 0.61 LaPlata WaterTreatment Plant 2004 27 0 3.61 3.44 4.93 0.00 0.00 13.00 3.49 8.00 4.19 LaPlata WaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 1.96 1.89 3.26 7.00 2.73 13.00 1.84 9.00 1.84 LaPlata WaterTreatment Plant 2006 11 0 0.82 0.62 1.40 6.00 1.04 5.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 Marceline WaterTreatment Plant 2003 26 0 2.39 2.52 3.79 0.00 0.00 12.00 2.27 8.00 2.87 Marceline WaterTreatment Plant 2004 32 0 1.35 1.38 2.18 7.00 1.62 13.00 1.30 6.00 1.43 Marceline WaterTreatment Plant 2005 33 0 0.64 0.63 0.98 6.00 0.83 13.00 0.60 9.00 0.64 Marceline WaterTreatment Plant 2006 31 0 0.24 0.24 0.45 7.00 0.18 12.00 0.21 8.00 0.32 Marceline WaterTreatment Plant 2007 30 0 1.26 1.26 2.39 6.00 0.77 13.00 1.14 7.00 1.83 Marceline WaterTreatment Plant 2008 31 0 1.15 1.09 2.27 6.00 1.01 13.00 1.01 8.00 1.48 Marceline WaterTreatment Plant 2009 30 0 0.62 0.62 0.89 6.00 0.72 11.00 0.62 7.00 0.60 Marceline WaterTreatment Plant 2010 31 0 2.51 1.99 6.12 4.00 0.42 12.00 3.38 10.00 2.29 Marceline WaterTreatment Plant 2011 31 0 1.95 1.87 5.28 6.00 1.65 11.00 1.29 8.00 3.29 Maryville Water

Treatment Plant 2003 23 0 3.73 2.88 5.22 0.00 0.00 11.00 2.44 6.00 4.55 

Maryville Water

Treatment Plant 2004 33 0 3.21 3.25 4.34 6.00 3.81 13.00 3.12 8.00 3.22 
250 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Maryville Water

Treatment Plant 2005 35 0 3.03 2.94 5.26 7.00 2.45 13.00 2.87 9.00 3.61 

Maryville Water

Treatment Plant 2006 35 0 3.15 3.07 5.52 7.00 2.38 13.00 3.27 9.00 3.85 

Maryville Water

Treatment Plant 2007 35 0 3.36 3.13 6.63 7.00 2.75 13.00 4.30 9.00 3.04 

Maryville Water

Treatment Plant 2008 28 0 2.15 2.10 3.42 5.00 2.12 12.00 1.76 8.00 2.71 

Maryville Water

Treatment Plant 2009 33 0 1.68 1.62 4.19 5.00 1.90 13.00 2.08 8.00 1.39 

Maryville Water

Treatment Plant 2010 33 0 1.91 1.80 4.61 5.00 1.11 13.00 1.95 9.00 2.32 

Maryville Water

Treatment Plant 2011 34 0 2.02 1.99 2.77 6.00 1.61 13.00 1.88 9.00 2.48 

Maysville 2006 23 0 1.09 1.20 1.87 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.31 7.00 1.09 Maysville 2007 20 0 0.65 0.68 1.13 3.00 0.98 7.00 0.73 4.00 0.52 Maysville 2008 34 0 0.39 0.39 0.56 7.00 0.41 13.00 0.36 9.00 0.40 Maysville 2009 34 0 0.38 0.37 0.47 6.00 0.36 13.00 0.39 8.00 0.39 Maysville 2010 33 0 2.23 1.91 8.04 5.00 0.37 13.00 2.29 9.00 3.38 Maysville 2011 34 0 0.78 0.80 1.50 6.00 1.30 13.00 0.82 9.00 0.59 Middle Fork Water

Company 2003 6 0 2.06 2.10 3.43 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.23 3.00 2.93 

Middle Fork Water

Company 2004 28 0 0.78 1.01 2.34 2.00 2.17 12.00 1.02 8.00 0.55 

Middle Fork Water

Company 2005 35 0 1.75 1.61 4.91 7.00 0.40 13.00 1.34 9.00 3.15 

Middle Fork Water

Company 2006 35 0 1.37 1.37 2.20 7.00 1.25 13.00 1.34 9.00 1.65 

Middle Fork Water

Company 2007 35 0 0.69 0.72 1.71 7.00 1.21 13.00 0.63 9.00 0.55 

Middle Fork Water

Company 2008 30 0 0.39 0.40 0.52 5.00 0.42 13.00 0.36 7.00 0.44 

Middle Fork Water

Company 2009 30 0 0.45 0.44 0.59 5.00 0.35 11.00 0.39 8.00 0.53 
251 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Middle Fork Water

Company 2010 34 0 0.45 0.43 0.76 6.00 0.39 12.00 0.52 9.00 0.44 

Middle Fork Water

Company 2011 34 0 0.45 0.44 1.12 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.47 9.00 0.48 

Monroe City‐‐Route JLake 2003 19 0 5.38 4.82 8.57 0.00 0.00 5.00 4.36 8.00 6.39 Monroe City‐‐Route JLake 2004 33 0 1.83 1.86 3.37 6.00 2.66 13.00 1.79 8.00 2.06 Monroe City‐‐Route JLake 2005 34 0 0.54 0.53 0.86 7.00 0.46 12.00 0.52 9.00 0.65 Monroe City‐‐Route JLake 2006 32 0 1.32 1.37 6.00 6.00 0.19 13.00 1.06 8.00 2.27 Monroe City‐‐Route JLake 2007 35 0 1.51 1.57 2.67 7.00 1.16 13.00 1.02 9.00 2.24 Monroe City‐‐Route JLake 2008 31 0 2.31 1.79 8.11 6.00 1.43 13.00 2.85 8.00 2.23 Monroe City‐‐Route JLake 2009 7 0 0.85 0.70 1.02 6.00 0.87 1.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 Monroe City‐‐S. Lake 2003 23 0 3.61 3.66 7.67 0.00 0.00 10.00 3.24 7.00 4.32 Monroe City‐‐S. Lake 2004 32 0 2.40 2.40 3.49 6.00 3.11 12.00 2.53 8.00 2.32 Monroe City‐‐S. Lake 2005 34 0 0.73 0.70 1.29 7.00 0.83 12.00 0.76 9.00 0.73 Monroe City‐‐S. Lake 2006 8 0 0.57 0.77 2.04 6.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.74 Monroe City‐‐S. Lake 2008 10 0 2.12 1.59 7.72 3.00 1.35 3.00 1.63 2.00 2.43 Shelbina 2003 27 0 1.55 1.26 9.07 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.51 8.00 1.88 Shelbina 2004 33 0 1.45 1.33 4.25 6.00 0.69 13.00 1.17 8.00 2.84 Shelbina 2005 34 0 0.83 0.81 2.82 7.00 0.47 13.00 0.55 8.00 1.58 Shelbina 2006 35 0 1.91 1.72 8.06 7.00 0.35 13.00 1.93 9.00 3.27 Shelbina 2007 34 0 0.81 0.80 4.69 7.00 1.02 13.00 0.57 9.00 0.93 Shelbina 2008 32 0 0.61 0.54 2.56 6.00 0.41 13.00 0.64 8.00 0.72 Shelbina 2009 7 0 0.35 0.35 0.35 6.00 0.35 1.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 
252 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Shelbina 1899 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Shelbina 2006 35 0 1.91 1.72 8.06 7.00 0.35 13.00 1.93 9.00 3.27 Shelbina 2007 34 0 0.81 0.80 4.69 7.00 1.02 13.00 0.57 9.00 0.93 Shelbina ‐ Salt River,Shelbina 2003 25 0 2.53 3.12 11.52 0.00 0.00 11.00 4.49 8.00 1.64 Shelbina Salt River 2004 33 0 1.77 1.29 11.59 6.00 0.39 13.00 3.48 8.00 1.00 Shelbina Salt River 2005 34 0 2.42 1.90 20.19 7.00 0.64 13.00 5.47 8.00 1.12 Shelbina Salt River 2006 35 0 1.30 0.93 14.07 7.00 0.05 13.00 3.11 9.00 0.35 Shelbina Salt River 2007 34 0 1.69 1.28 11.00 7.00 0.43 13.00 3.41 9.00 0.91 Shelbina Salt River 2008 32 0 2.36 1.62 16.36 6.00 0.70 13.00 4.27 8.00 1.14 Shelbina Salt River 2009 7 0 0.35 0.35 0.35 6.00 0.35 1.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 Smithville WaterTreatment Plant 2003 27 0 3.04 3.21 4.08 0.00 0.00 13.00 2.78 8.00 3.39 Smithville WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 2.66 2.74 3.75 6.00 2.92 13.00 2.47 8.00 3.10 Smithville WaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 2.29 2.20 4.62 7.00 2.00 13.00 1.99 9.00 3.25 Smithville WaterTreatment Plant 2006 35 0 1.47 1.50 2.35 7.00 1.42 13.00 1.26 9.00 1.69 Smithville WaterTreatment Plant 2007 35 0 2.29 2.28 3.36 7.00 1.86 13.00 2.42 9.00 2.44 Smithville WaterTreatment Plant 2008 31 0 1.72 1.82 2.82 6.00 2.45 13.00 1.47 8.00 1.74 Smithville WaterTreatment Plant 2009 34 0 1.40 1.39 2.06 6.00 1.20 13.00 1.26 8.00 1.64 Smithville WaterTreatment Plant 2010 34 0 1.85 1.80 3.35 6.00 1.23 13.00 1.67 9.00 2.48 Smithville WaterTreatment Plant 2011 34 0 1.76 1.79 2.30 6.00 1.54 13.00 1.46 9.00 2.14 Unionville Water

Treatment Plant 2003 27 0 1.87 1.83 2.42 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.82 8.00 1.96 
253 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Unionville Water

Treatment Plant 2004 33 0 2.02 2.02 3.56 6.00 1.75 13.00 1.76 8.00 2.55 

Unionville Water

Treatment Plant 2005 34 0 1.79 1.71 4.23 6.00 1.41 13.00 1.55 9.00 2.67 

Unionville Water

Treatment Plant 2006 27 0 1.27 1.25 2.05 7.00 1.46 11.00 1.15 8.00 1.22 

Vandalia WaterTreatment Plant 2003 23 0 5.11 3.59 15.59 0.00 0.00 9.00 3.17 8.00 6.18 Vandalia WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 3.52 3.42 11.07 6.00 1.05 13.00 2.82 8.00 6.74 Vandalia WaterTreatment Plant 2005 35 0 1.29 1.31 2.40 7.00 0.96 13.00 1.17 9.00 1.91 Vandalia WaterTreatment Plant 2006 35 0 0.93 0.94 2.38 7.00 0.91 13.00 0.78 9.00 1.34 Vandalia WaterTreatment Plant 2007 32 0 1.16 1.17 1.98 6.00 0.89 12.00 1.15 8.00 1.55 Vandalia WaterTreatment Plant 2008 31 0 2.33 1.74 12.33 6.00 1.28 12.00 3.43 8.00 1.76 Vandalia WaterTreatment Plant 2009 7 0 2.61 1.84 3.40 6.00 2.88 1.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 Wyaconda WaterDepartment 2003 23 0 3.07 3.26 4.47 0.00 0.00 9.00 3.33 8.00 3.39 Wyaconda WaterDepartment 2005 44 0 13.11 11.37 26.62 6.00 0.38 13.00 14.69 13.00 19.26 Wyaconda WaterDepartment 2008 44 0 1.42 1.31 4.08 9.00 0.79 13.00 1.55 14.00 2.13 Wyaconda WaterDepartment 2009 7 0 0.59 0.46 0.72 7.00 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wyaconda WaterTreatment Plant 2004 33 0 1.03 1.04 3.37 6.00 1.70 13.00 1.10 8.00 0.84 Wyaconda WaterTreatment Plant 2006 52 0 4.33 4.36 10.42 13.00 7.10 13.00 4.38 13.00 3.70 
254 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Wyaconda WaterTreatment Plant 2007 48 0 1.48 1.46 3.54 13.00 2.07 13.00 1.19 9.00 1.42 Johnston CountyUtilities Department 2006 13 0 0.06 0.08 0.12 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.10 6.00 0.05 Johnston CountyUtilities Department 2007 33 0 0.52 0.48 0.95 11.00 0.69 11.00 0.48 5.00 0.36 Johnston CountyUtilities Department 2008 33 0 0.59 0.55 1.30 12.00 0.81 11.00 0.53 6.00 0.40 Johnston CountyUtilities Department 2009 35 0 0.45 0.43 0.77 11.00 0.52 11.00 0.48 6.00 0.35 Johnston CountyUtilities Department 2010 39 0 0.42 0.42 0.72 8.00 0.45 11.00 0.41 8.00 0.37 Johnston CountyUtilities Department 2011 34 0 0.61 0.58 5.09 10.00 0.49 11.00 0.79 7.00 0.41 Monroe (John Glenn

WTP ‐ NC)

Not enough

data for2007

Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2004 33 0 0.85 0.82 2.49 6.00 0.86 13.00 0.81 8.00 1.18 Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2005 33 0 1.89 1.60 4.16 5.00 0.72 13.00 2.46 9.00 1.95 Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2006 35 0 0.61 0.66 3.73 7.00 1.09 13.00 0.51 9.00 0.36 Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2007 33 0 1.80 1.74 2.91 7.00 1.06 12.00 2.12 8.00 2.07 Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2008 28 0 2.51 2.46 5.02 6.00 1.93 12.00 2.88 6.00 2.90 Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2009 33 0 1.61 1.60 2.29 6.00 1.33 12.00 1.52 8.00 1.79 Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2010 31 0 0.68 0.67 1.17 3.00 0.64 12.00 0.73 10.00 0.75 Monroe‐‐John Glenn 2011 35 0 1.50 1.37 2.80 6.00 0.49 13.00 1.60 10.00 2.00 
255 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

South Granville 2008 22 0 0.50 0.52 0.65 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.57 8.00 0.49 South Granville 2009 34 0 0.43 0.43 0.57 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.39 8.00 0.54 South Granville 2010 34 0 0.38 0.37 0.43 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.38 9.00 0.37 South Granville 2011 34 0 0.39 0.38 0.68 6.00 0.37 13.00 0.39 9.00 0.39 Alliance Water

Treatment Plant 2003 26 0 2.96 2.29 8.10 0.00 0.00 12.00 1.80 8.00 4.77 

Alliance Water

Treatment Plant 2004 33 0 2.52 2.38 7.48 6.00 0.62 13.00 2.14 8.00 4.60 

Alliance Water

Treatment Plant 2005 32 0 0.85 0.78 2.30 4.00 0.39 13.00 0.51 9.00 1.45 

Alliance Water

Treatment Plant 2006 32 0 1.86 2.05 13.58 7.00 0.35 12.00 0.67 7.00 3.62 

Alliance Water

Treatment Plant 2007 35 0 0.84 0.86 1.84 7.00 0.42 13.00 0.51 9.00 1.53 

Alliance Water

Treatment Plant 2008 29 0 0.53 0.55 0.85 6.00 0.38 10.00 0.36 8.00 0.71 

Alliance Water

Treatment Plant 2009 7 0 0.46 0.39 0.57 6.00 0.49 1.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 

Blanchester

Not enoughdata for2003

Blanchester 2004 33 0 2.09 1.94 8.45 6.00 0.56 13.00 1.95 8.00 3.60 Blanchester 2005 34 0 4.83 3.83 33.29 6.00 0.77 13.00 9.22 9.00 3.44 Blanchester 2006 35 0 1.93 1.92 10.97 7.00 0.54 13.00 2.05 9.00 3.96 Blanchester 2007 35 0 1.06 1.19 3.71 7.00 0.45 13.00 0.59 9.00 1.60 Blanchester 2008 32 0 4.40 4.39 11.65 6.00 7.72 13.00 5.21 8.00 2.47 Blanchester 2009 34 0 4.87 4.51 11.15 6.00 6.54 13.00 6.68 8.00 3.58 Blanchester 2010 34 0 6.04 4.74 32.52 6.00 0.90 13.00 11.20 9.00 5.15 Blanchester 2011 34 0 1.08 1.07 2.96 6.00 0.74 13.00 0.59 9.00 2.16 Bowling Green Water 2003 23 0 2.15 1.44 4.87 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.99 7.00 2.74 
256 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

TreatmentBowling Green Water

Treatment Plant 2004 33 0 1.99 1.69 6.07 6.00 0.45 13.00 2.42 8.00 2.98 

Bowling Green Water

Treatment Plant 2005 31 0 1.98 1.47 4.79 7.00 0.48 13.00 2.60 9.00 2.19 

Bowling Green Water

Treatment Plant 2006 35 0 2.23 1.66 15.96 7.00 0.14 13.00 4.95 9.00 1.38 

Bowling Green Water

Treatment Plant 2007 35 0 2.54 2.02 11.80 7.00 0.41 13.00 4.18 9.00 2.80 

Bowling Green Water

Treatment Plant 2008 30 0 3.27 2.33 33.55 5.00 0.49 13.00 5.81 8.00 2.15 

Bowling Green Water

Treatment Plant 2009 7 0 0.50 0.43 0.59 6.00 0.52 1.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 

Cinnamon Lake Utility

Co. 2003 20 0 2.35 1.85 3.45 0.00 0.00 6.00 1.22 8.00 2.75 

Cinnamon Lake Utility

Co. 2004 33 0 2.22 2.49 4.74 6.00 1.68 13.00 0.94 8.00 4.00 

Cinnamon Lake Utility

Co. 2006 35 0 1.67 1.78 4.27 7.00 0.78 13.00 0.83 9.00 3.18 

Cinnamon Lake Utility

Co. 2007 34 0 1.10 1.17 3.53 6.00 1.77 13.00 0.94 9.00 1.06 

Cinnamon Lake Utility

Co. 2008 32 0 0.71 0.80 1.25 6.00 0.62 13.00 0.41 8.00 1.03 

Cinnamon Lake Utility

Co.

Not enoughdata for2009

City of Defiance 2003 27 0 2.35 1.44 15.06 0.00 0.00 13.00 3.81 8.00 1.12 City of Defiance 2004 33 0 2.62 1.91 19.27 6.00 0.38 13.00 5.08 8.00 1.57 City of Defiance 2006 34 0 2.04 1.42 19.07 7.00 0.27 13.00 4.48 9.00 0.80 
257 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

City of Defiance 2007 34 0 1.71 1.31 7.83 7.00 0.45 13.00 3.12 9.00 1.11 City of Defiance 2008 29 0 3.40 2.10 13.94 4.00 0.38 13.00 6.26 8.00 1.36 City of Defiance 2009 34 0 2.38 1.74 19.10 6.00 0.49 13.00 4.75 8.00 1.23 City of Defiance 2010 34 0 2.56 1.87 14.93 6.00 0.43 13.00 5.41 9.00 1.12 City of Defiance 2011 34 0 1.76 1.39 7.83 6.00 0.47 13.00 3.10 9.00 1.39 City of Lima 2003 27 0 0.92 0.86 3.17 0.00 0.00 13.00 0.72 8.00 1.22 City of Lima 2004 33 0 1.08 1.08 1.98 6.00 0.78 13.00 0.92 8.00 1.31 City of Lima 2006 34 0 0.61 0.62 1.33 7.00 0.48 13.00 0.53 9.00 0.89 City of Lima 2007 33 0 1.09 1.09 1.53 7.00 0.82 13.00 1.13 7.00 1.33 City of Lima 2008 33 0 1.32 1.35 3.22 7.00 0.85 13.00 1.00 8.00 1.83 City of Lima 2009 7 0 1.23 0.91 1.64 6.00 1.36 1.00 0.76 0.00 0.00 City of Shelby‐‐ 

Reservoir 3 2003 21 0 0.66 1.07 1.93 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.16 7.00 0.60 

City of Shelby‐‐ 

Reservoir 3 2004 33 0 0.50 0.51 0.83 6.00 0.57 13.00 0.49 8.00 0.51 

City of Shelby‐‐ 

Reservoir 3 2006 31 0 0.67 0.72 1.71 7.00 0.41 11.00 0.38 8.00 1.26 

City of Shelby‐‐ 

Reservoir 3 2007 35 0 1.30 1.27 3.73 7.00 1.20 13.00 1.26 9.00 1.42 

City of Shelby‐‐ 

Reservoir 3 2008 32 0 1.36 1.41 2.37 6.00 1.23 13.00 1.03 8.00 1.80 

City of Shelby‐‐ 

Reservoir 3 2009 33 0 0.90 0.90 1.86 6.00 0.93 12.00 0.82 8.00 0.97 

City of Shelby‐‐ 

Reservoir 3 2010 34 0 1.01 1.02 3.32 6.00 0.76 13.00 0.87 9.00 1.17 

City of Shelby‐‐ 

Reservoir 3 2011 34 0 0.77 0.77 0.98 6.00 0.65 13.00 0.74 9.00 0.85 

City of Shelby‐‐

Reservoir 2 2003 21 0 1.32 1.79 2.73 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.73 7.00 1.57 

City of Shelby‐‐

Reservoir 2 2004 33 0 2.00 1.91 4.40 6.00 0.68 13.00 1.61 8.00 3.46 
258 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

City of Shelby‐‐

Reservoir 2 2006 31 0 2.04 2.04 10.72 7.00 0.49 11.00 3.01 8.00 3.20 

City of Shelby‐‐

Reservoir 2 2007 35 0 2.08 2.12 3.72 7.00 1.18 13.00 1.77 9.00 3.14 

City of Shelby‐‐

Reservoir 2 2008 32 0 1.46 1.44 2.13 6.00 1.33 13.00 1.42 8.00 1.58 

City of Shelby‐‐

Reservoir 2 2009 33 0 1.20 1.20 2.17 6.00 1.15 12.00 1.10 8.00 1.31 

City of Shelby‐‐

Reservoir 2 2010 34 0 1.17 1.18 2.58 6.00 0.75 13.00 0.96 9.00 1.70 

City of Shelby‐‐

Reservoir 2 2011 34 0 0.94 0.92 7.13 6.00 0.99 13.00 1.13 9.00 0.68 

Clermont Co. Water

Not enough

data for2003

Clermont Co. Water 2004 33 0 3.30 3.21 13.24 6.00 1.95 13.00 3.35 8.00 4.42 Clermont Co. Water 2006 35 0 2.39 2.62 7.05 7.00 4.94 13.00 1.61 9.00 2.18 Clermont Co. Water 2007 32 0 1.11 1.21 4.03 6.00 1.57 12.00 0.74 8.00 1.13 Clermont Co. Water 2008 30 0 2.75 2.40 11.44 6.00 1.68 12.00 3.45 8.00 2.11 Clermont Co. Water 2009 32 0 2.31 2.09 5.41 5.00 1.60 12.00 2.62 8.00 2.56 Clermont Co. Water 2010 31 0 4.92 3.99 26.12 3.00 2.47 13.00 7.42 9.00 3.63 Clermont Co. Water 2011 28 0 1.97 1.77 4.06 6.00 1.53 7.00 1.71 9.00 2.07 Delaware Water Plant 2003 27 0 2.72 1.69 12.89 0.00 0.00 13.00 4.29 8.00 1.70 Delaware Water Plant 2004 32 0 2.42 2.05 11.72 6.00 0.32 13.00 3.09 8.00 3.31 Delaware Water Plant 2006 34 0 2.24 1.56 15.64 7.00 0.05 13.00 4.48 9.00 1.33 Delaware Water Plant 2007 35 0 2.84 2.19 12.92 7.00 0.42 13.00 5.28 9.00 2.15 Delaware Water Plant 2008 32 0 4.10 3.04 37.44 6.00 0.44 13.00 7.74 8.00 2.29 Delaware Water Plant 2009 34 0 2.41 1.97 7.98 6.00 0.60 13.00 3.61 8.00 2.66 Delaware Water Plant 2010 34 0 1.77 1.53 9.94 6.00 0.51 13.00 2.94 9.00 1.59 
259 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Delaware Water Plant 2011 34 0 1.85 1.54 11.43 6.00 0.60 13.00 2.87 9.00 1.95 Lake of the Woods

Water Company

Not enough

data for2003

Lake of the Woods

Water Company 2004 31 0 2.02 1.91 6.53 6.00 0.51 12.00 2.73 7.00 2.59 

Lake of the Woods

Water Company 2006 34 0 2.57 2.38 14.78 7.00 1.74 13.00 2.74 9.00 4.00 

Lake of the Woods

Water Company 2007 33 0 0.78 0.83 1.54 6.00 0.79 12.00 0.53 9.00 0.91 

Lake of the Woods

Water Company 2008 24 0 2.48 2.11 8.32 5.00 1.06 11.00 3.47 8.00 2.14 

McClure Water

Treatment Plant 2003 11 0 2.55 1.98 15.57 0.00 0.00 5.00 5.45 4.00 1.51 

McClure Water

Treatment Plant 2004 25 0 3.04 2.24 20.87 3.00 0.39 11.00 6.65 8.00 1.47 

McClure Water

Treatment Plant 2006 29 0 2.60 2.08 24.76 7.00 0.07 12.00 7.21 8.00 0.89 

McClure Water

Treatment Plant 2007 28 0 3.13 1.86 10.51 5.00 0.40 8.00 4.01 9.00 2.47 

McClure Water

Treatment Plant 2008 29 0 4.46 2.78 50.57 5.00 0.36 12.00 8.25 8.00 1.88 

McClure Water

Treatment Plant 2009 32 0 2.71 1.97 15.27 4.00 0.56 13.00 4.95 8.00 1.82 

McClure Water

Treatment Plant 2010 33 0 3.03 2.19 20.54 6.00 0.43 13.00 6.04 9.00 1.56 

McClure Water

Treatment Plant 2011 30 0 2.12 1.50 9.99 3.00 0.40 13.00 2.57 9.00 2.45 

Monroeville

Not enoughdata for2003

Monroeville 2004 33 0 2.17 1.66 18.74 6.00 0.37 13.00 3.51 8.00 1.93 
260 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Monroeville 2006 35 0 1.43 1.12 11.38 7.00 0.38 13.00 2.94 9.00 0.87 Monroeville 2007 33 0 1.99 1.64 17.77 7.00 0.44 13.00 3.82 7.00 1.71 Monroeville 2008 28 0 0.83 0.82 1.64 2.00 0.75 13.00 0.72 8.00 0.97 Monroeville 2009 32 0 0.73 0.74 0.92 6.00 0.71 13.00 0.66 7.00 0.84 Monroeville 2010 28 0 0.93 0.85 4.54 5.00 0.83 13.00 1.04 7.00 0.80 Monroeville 2011 27 0 0.76 0.74 1.48 2.00 0.60 12.00 0.69 7.00 0.88 Monroeville‐ West

Branch Huron 2008 32 0 3.01 2.06 42.72 6.00 0.40 13.00 5.91 8.00 1.30 

Monroeville‐ West

Branch Huron 2009 32 0 1.72 1.35 10.42 6.00 0.51 13.00 2.75 7.00 1.39 

Monroeville‐ West

Branch Huron 2010 25 0 2.13 1.47 10.66 5.00 0.48 13.00 3.17 7.00 1.26 

Monroeville‐ West

Branch Huron

Not enough

data for2011

Mt. Orab 2003 26 0 1.08 1.09 3.21 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.93 8.00 1.08 Mt. Orab 2004 29 0 0.64 0.67 1.11 6.00 0.93 11.00 0.57 8.00 0.58 Mt. Orab 2006 37 0 2.75 2.81 8.56 8.00 5.89 14.00 2.08 9.00 2.23 Mt. Orab 2007 35 0 0.83 0.85 1.78 7.00 0.94 13.00 0.76 9.00 0.78 Mt. Orab 2008 31 0 2.22 2.13 2.88 6.00 2.44 13.00 2.39 8.00 2.02 Mt. Orab 2009 15 0 1.06 1.43 1.75 6.00 0.89 9.00 1.31 0.00 0.00 Mt. Orab 1899 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mt. Orab 2007 35 0 0.83 0.85 1.78 7.00 0.94 13.00 0.76 9.00 0.78 Mt. Orab ‐ Creek 2003 9 0 1.79 1.22 2.94 0.00 0.00 6.00 1.20 3.00 1.60 Mt. Orab‐ SterlingRun Creek 2004 6 0 3.62 1.87 10.27 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.27 2.00 3.87 Mt. Orab‐ SterlingRun Creek 2006 24 0 18.84 10.01 270.23 5.00 4.09 9.00 34.97 5.00 1.12 
261 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Mt. Orab‐ SterlingRun Creek 2007 33 0 2.23 1.63 15.40 1.00 0.35 15.00 1.16 10.00 2.54 Mt. Orab‐ SterlingRun Creek 2008 26 0 6.41 3.81 86.67 2.00 1.94 12.00 11.45 8.00 1.53 Mt. Orab‐ SterlingRun Creek 2009 15 0 3.60 19.22 31.87 6.00 0.79 9.00 12.35 0.00 0.00 Napoleon

Not enough

data for2003

Napoleon 2004 33 0 2.62 1.88 20.28 6.00 0.38 13.00 5.17 8.00 1.39 Napoleon 2006 35 0 2.47 1.78 19.18 7.00 0.24 13.00 5.66 9.00 0.89 Napoleon 2007 35 0 2.58 1.99 10.51 7.00 0.38 13.00 4.77 9.00 2.15 Napoleon 2008 32 0 3.69 2.56 37.24 6.00 0.59 13.00 7.56 8.00 1.52 Napoleon 2009 34 0 2.34 1.73 14.93 6.00 0.42 13.00 4.47 8.00 1.50 Napoleon 2010 34 0 3.12 2.28 18.60 6.00 0.44 13.00 6.45 9.00 1.58 Napoleon 2011 34 0 1.94 1.54 9.80 6.00 0.47 13.00 2.68 9.00 2.27 New WashingtonWater Plant 2003 26 0 1.39 1.07 3.31 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.23 9.00 2.11 New WashingtonWater Plant 2004 33 0 1.07 1.25 4.05 6.00 1.16 13.00 0.54 8.00 1.32 New WashingtonWater Plant 2006 32 0 0.60 0.69 4.38 7.00 0.36 13.00 0.28 8.00 1.58 New WashingtonWater Plant 2007 29 0 1.16 1.23 3.10 4.00 0.58 12.00 1.03 9.00 1.69 New WashingtonWater Plant 2008 28 0 0.71 0.72 1.06 5.00 0.79 13.00 0.70 5.00 0.87 New WashingtonWater Plant 2009 4 0 0.46 0.44 0.48 4.00 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Newark Water Works 2004 30 0 1.30 0.91 6.75 3.00 0.34 13.00 2.29 8.00 0.65 Newark Water Works 2006 35 0 0.79 0.66 8.04 7.00 0.36 13.00 1.50 9.00 0.42 Newark Water Works 2007 34 0 0.97 0.85 7.54 7.00 0.79 13.00 1.48 9.00 0.51 
262 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Newark Water Works 2008 32 0 2.18 1.55 20.75 7.00 0.44 12.00 4.70 8.00 0.65 Newark Water Works 2009 33 0 0.75 0.64 5.09 5.00 0.47 13.00 1.04 8.00 0.45 Newark Water Works 2010 34 0 0.81 0.71 4.42 6.00 0.61 13.00 1.34 9.00 0.43 Newark Water Works 2011 140 0 1.65 0.99 27.25 6.00 0.81 91.00 2.21 37.00 0.49 Newark Water Works,Newark

Not enough

data for2007

Norwalk Water

Treatment Plant 2003 25 0 2.64 2.54 5.76 0.00 0.00 12.00 1.14 7.00 3.45 

Norwalk Water

Treatment Plant 2004 32 0 3.31 3.27 5.20 6.00 3.91 13.00 2.94 7.00 3.29 

Norwalk Water

Treatment Plant 2006 35 0 2.43 2.24 10.08 7.00 0.52 13.00 2.14 9.00 4.20 

Norwalk Water

Treatment Plant 2007 34 0 1.52 1.66 3.59 7.00 0.66 13.00 1.07 8.00 1.83 

Norwalk Water

Treatment Plant 2008 31 0 1.43 1.76 2.96 6.00 1.90 13.00 0.90 8.00 1.69 

Norwalk Water

Treatment Plant 2009 7 0 1.62 1.24 1.95 6.00 1.75 1.00 1.07 0.00 0.00 

Piqua Gravel Pit 2004 33 0 0.53 0.44 6.34 6.00 0.26 13.00 0.86 8.00 0.34 Piqua Gravel Pit 2006 34 0 0.12 0.10 0.49 7.00 0.05 12.00 0.12 9.00 0.15 Piqua Gravel Pit 2007 35 0 1.89 1.77 7.06 7.00 0.42 13.00 1.56 9.00 3.62 Piqua Gravel Pit 2008 33 0 0.81 0.75 1.83 7.00 1.08 13.00 0.78 8.00 0.75 Piqua Gravel Pit 2009 34 0 0.44 0.45 1.02 6.00 0.56 13.00 0.41 8.00 0.38 Piqua Gravel Pit 2010 34 0 0.53 0.52 0.88 6.00 0.63 13.00 0.56 9.00 0.41 Piqua Gravel Pit 2011 34 0 0.67 0.60 3.36 6.00 0.53 13.00 0.89 9.00 0.60 Piqua Miami River 2004 33 0 1.88 1.44 14.12 6.00 0.42 13.00 3.48 8.00 1.28 Piqua Miami River 2006 34 0 1.75 1.24 16.91 7.00 0.08 12.00 3.75 9.00 0.83 Piqua Miami River 2007 35 0 1.33 1.07 11.49 7.00 0.47 13.00 2.66 9.00 0.63 
263 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Piqua Miami River 2008 33 0 3.48 2.37 36.22 7.00 0.41 13.00 7.40 8.00 1.25 Piqua Miami River 2009 34 0 0.76 0.68 2.56 6.00 0.54 13.00 1.09 8.00 0.63 Piqua Miami River 2010 34 0 1.32 1.04 11.48 6.00 0.63 13.00 2.53 9.00 0.63 Piqua Miami River 2011 34 0 1.06 0.88 11.13 6.00 0.47 13.00 1.88 9.00 0.66 Piqua Reservoir 2003 21 0 6.79 16.55 37.79 0.00 0.00 8.00 25.80 7.00 1.74 Piqua Reservoir 2004 33 0 3.33 2.72 12.92 6.00 0.54 13.00 4.92 8.00 3.81 Piqua Reservoir 1899 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Piqua Reservoir 2004 33 0 3.33 2.72 12.92 6.00 0.54 13.00 4.92 8.00 3.81 Piqua Reservoir‐ Gravel Pit, Piqua 2003 21 0 0.32 0.27 0.68 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.42 7.00 0.21 Piqua Reservoir‐ Miami River, Piqua 2003 21 0 2.60 5.76 12.56 0.00 0.00 8.00 8.45 7.00 1.45 Piqua‐‐Swift Lake 2006 34 0 3.24 2.98 15.84 7.00 1.51 12.00 3.59 9.00 2.99 Piqua‐‐Swift Lake 2007 35 0 4.66 4.07 14.38 7.00 2.87 13.00 7.41 9.00 2.69 Piqua‐‐Swift Lake 2008 33 0 7.73 5.69 33.49 7.00 2.74 13.00 13.20 8.00 5.04 Piqua‐‐Swift Lake 2009 34 0 1.84 1.61 7.75 6.00 1.95 13.00 2.05 8.00 1.39 Piqua‐‐Swift Lake 2010 34 0 5.52 4.55 30.26 6.00 3.88 13.00 9.94 9.00 2.67 Piqua‐‐Swift Lake 2011 34 0 8.01 6.34 44.08 6.00 3.75 13.00 10.52 9.00 9.80 Upper Sandusky City

Hall 2003 20 0 1.93 1.47 4.20 0.00 0.00 10.00 1.42 6.00 2.63 

Upper Sandusky City

Hall 2004 31 0 1.20 1.31 3.25 5.00 1.26 13.00 0.91 8.00 1.57 

Upper Sandusky City

Hall 2006 28 0 0.51 0.54 1.12 6.00 0.73 10.00 0.50 6.00 0.61 

Upper Sandusky City

Hall 2007 31 0 1.15 1.14 1.85 4.00 0.75 12.00 0.84 9.00 1.60 

Upper Sandusky City

Hall 2008 28 0 1.11 1.14 1.68 6.00 0.98 12.00 0.99 8.00 1.43 
264 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Upper Sandusky City

Hall 2009 4 0 0.87 0.95 0.97 4.00 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Village of Ottawa 2003 27 0 1.52 1.23 2.64 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.23 8.00 1.93 Village of Ottawa 2004 33 0 1.77 1.72 4.08 6.00 0.81 13.00 1.51 8.00 2.58 Village of Ottawa 2006 34 0 0.77 0.77 2.26 7.00 0.41 13.00 0.66 8.00 1.51 Village of Ottawa 2007 35 0 0.78 0.79 1.26 7.00 0.74 13.00 0.73 9.00 0.94 Village of Ottawa 2008 30 0 0.98 1.01 2.30 6.00 0.55 13.00 0.73 6.00 1.70 Village of Ottawa 2009 32 0 1.44 1.41 3.66 6.00 0.59 12.00 1.14 7.00 2.56 Village of Ottawa 2010 29 0 1.59 1.37 3.41 5.00 0.76 13.00 1.68 7.00 2.04 Village of Ottawa 2011 32 0 1.49 1.40 3.96 4.00 0.57 13.00 0.98 9.00 2.71 Waynoka RegionalWater 2003 13 0 0.90 1.98 4.55 0.00 0.00 6.00 2.21 7.00 0.64 Waynoka RegionalWater 2004 21 0 3.07 2.70 11.23 3.00 0.40 7.00 0.30 5.00 6.11 Waynoka RegionalWater 2006 35 0 0.58 0.60 1.12 7.00 0.70 13.00 0.47 9.00 0.66 Waynoka RegionalWater 2007 35 0 0.71 0.71 0.93 7.00 0.83 13.00 0.72 9.00 0.66 Waynoka RegionalWater 2008 32 0 1.40 1.49 2.85 7.00 0.73 13.00 1.12 8.00 1.94 Waynoka RegionalWater 2009 33 0 1.43 1.49 2.15 6.00 1.81 12.00 1.17 8.00 1.65 Waynoka RegionalWater 2010 34 0 0.98 0.98 1.43 6.00 1.31 13.00 1.03 9.00 0.90 Waynoka RegionalWater 2011 34 0 1.00 1.13 2.68 6.00 0.87 13.00 0.57 9.00 0.81 Wilmington

Not enoughdata for2003

Wilmington 2004 33 0 1.94 1.93 3.85 6.00 0.99 13.00 1.54 8.00 2.77 Wilmington 2006 34 0 1.32 1.34 3.52 7.00 0.69 13.00 1.25 7.00 2.05 
265 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Wilmington 2007 33 0 0.87 0.92 1.90 7.00 1.15 13.00 0.75 9.00 0.88 Wilmington 2008 33 0 1.98 1.88 5.86 7.00 0.74 13.00 2.15 8.00 2.38 Wilmington 2009 33 0 1.72 1.70 2.40 6.00 1.74 12.00 1.81 9.00 1.70 Wilmington 2010 32 0 1.34 1.35 2.02 6.00 1.48 11.00 1.03 9.00 1.69 Wilmington 2011 33 0 1.14 1.13 2.39 6.00 1.06 12.00 0.93 9.00 1.60 Polk Center 2008 21 0 3.74 17.97 45.11 0.00 0.00 8.00 25.91 5.00 0.48 Polk Center 2009 35 0 0.37 0.38 0.73 6.00 0.35 12.00 0.41 6.00 0.39 Polk Center 2010 38 0 1.41 1.12 20.87 6.00 0.37 13.00 3.40 6.00 0.39 Polk Center 2011 40 0 0.43 0.41 2.53 7.00 0.37 13.00 0.54 7.00 0.37 Aquilla Water Supply

District 2003 25 0 3.22 3.50 4.35 0.00 0.00 12.00 3.12 7.00 3.15 

Aquilla Water Supply

District 2004 33 0 1.66 1.52 3.66 9.00 1.51 13.00 1.98 6.00 1.80 

Aquilla Water Supply

District 2006 26 0 1.33 1.01 4.60 9.00 1.32 10.00 1.73 6.00 0.78 

Cameron 2006 15 0 0.16 0.11 0.32 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.08 6.00 0.21 Cameron 2007 33 0 0.99 0.89 4.59 8.00 1.89 13.00 0.82 6.00 0.43 Cameron 2008 27 0 0.68 0.64 4.52 6.00 0.49 11.00 1.24 5.00 0.41 Cameron 2009 30 0 0.87 0.70 3.66 9.00 0.67 10.00 1.23 6.00 0.46 Cameron 2010 29 0 1.20 0.88 18.44 6.00 0.47 11.00 2.09 7.00 0.57 Cameron 2011 35 0 0.54 0.51 2.04 8.00 0.45 14.00 0.71 7.00 0.42 Cameron 1899 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cameron 2009 30 0 0.87 0.70 3.66 9.00 0.67 10.00 1.23 6.00 0.46 City of Ennis 2003 23 0 1.50 1.42 3.16 0.00 0.00 11.00 1.48 6.00 1.24 City of Ennis 2004 34 0 1.66 1.61 3.26 9.00 1.52 13.00 2.15 6.00 1.62 City of Ennis 2006 34 0 0.53 0.47 3.19 9.00 0.36 13.00 0.78 6.00 0.44 
266 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

City of Ennis 2007 34 0 1.23 1.08 4.29 9.00 0.87 13.00 1.89 6.00 0.81 City of Ennis 2008 33 0 1.63 1.59 4.24 10.00 0.75 13.00 2.25 5.00 1.78 City of Ennis 2009 10 0 1.84 1.98 2.34 9.00 1.74 1.00 2.06 0.00 0.00 City of Taylor 2003 25 0 0.36 0.42 0.69 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.41 7.00 0.40 City of Taylor 2004 33 0 0.84 0.63 4.07 9.00 0.42 13.00 1.67 6.00 0.20 City of Taylor 2006 32 0 0.13 0.11 0.40 9.00 0.05 12.00 0.22 6.00 0.05 City of Taylor 2007 33 0 0.63 0.62 2.47 8.00 1.32 13.00 0.45 6.00 0.35 City of Taylor 2008 30 0 0.45 0.43 1.00 8.00 0.40 12.00 0.52 6.00 0.40 City of Taylor 2009 32 0 0.49 0.47 0.96 7.00 0.51 13.00 0.59 6.00 0.44 City of Taylor 2010 35 0 0.57 0.54 1.22 8.00 0.39 13.00 0.64 7.00 0.77 City of Taylor 2011 33 0 0.43 0.42 0.49 8.00 0.38 12.00 0.45 7.00 0.44 Cooper WaterTreatment Plant 2003 14 0 0.32 0.32 0.46 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.31 5.00 0.33 Cooper WaterTreatment Plant 2004 31 0 0.25 0.26 0.39 8.00 0.34 12.00 0.22 5.00 0.26 Cooper WaterTreatment Plant 2006 31 0 0.48 0.48 1.58 9.00 1.00 12.00 0.40 4.00 0.36 Cooper WaterTreatment Plant 2007 26 0 1.87 1.62 3.21 7.00 1.96 10.00 2.70 6.00 1.13 Cooper WaterTreatment Plant 2008 27 0 1.95 1.63 3.79 6.00 1.10 12.00 2.38 6.00 1.64 Cooper WaterTreatment Plant 2009 31 0 1.15 1.12 3.18 8.00 0.98 10.00 1.72 6.00 1.24 Cooper WaterTreatment Plant 2010 31 0 2.00 1.66 6.11 6.00 0.49 12.00 2.91 8.00 1.90 Cooper WaterTreatment Plant 2011 31 0 0.64 0.60 1.00 7.00 0.70 12.00 0.67 7.00 0.53 Corsicanna 2003 25 0 1.08 1.13 1.40 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.04 6.00 1.18 Corsicanna 2004 34 0 2.78 2.71 6.03 9.00 3.04 13.00 2.43 6.00 3.38 
267 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Corsicanna 2006 30 0 1.33 1.24 8.96 10.00 1.50 13.00 1.08 6.00 1.19 Crosby 2008 19 0 1.35 1.15 2.16 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.48 6.00 1.52 Crosby 2009 35 0 1.37 1.17 5.28 9.00 1.34 13.00 1.74 6.00 0.89 Crosby 2010 33 0 1.53 1.40 4.04 8.00 0.66 13.00 2.26 7.00 1.73 Crosby 2011 27 0 1.25 1.20 1.73 8.00 0.94 12.00 1.39 6.00 1.40 Crosby 1899 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crosby 2009 35 0 1.37 1.17 5.28 9.00 1.34 13.00 1.74 6.00 0.89 Crosby‐‐Gulf Aquifer 2008 6 0 1.62 1.27 2.27 0.00 0.00 5.00 1.54 0.00 0.00 Crosby‐‐Gulf Aquifer

Not enough

data for2010

Crosby‐‐Gulf Aquifer 2011 9 0 0.96 0.91 1.61 2.00 0.37 1.00 0.63 1.00 1.59 Marlin Water

Treatment Plant 2003 17 0 1.74 2.23 3.73 0.00 0.00 9.00 2.51 5.00 1.84 

Marlin Water

Treatment Plant 2004 35 0 0.42 0.39 0.91 9.00 0.71 13.00 0.47 7.00 0.21 

Marlin Water

Treatment Plant 2006 29 0 0.22 0.18 0.70 9.00 0.45 13.00 0.17 6.00 0.05 

Midlothian WaterTreatment Plant 2003 24 0 1.45 1.62 1.88 0.00 0.00 13.00 1.31 6.00 1.65 Midlothian WaterTreatment Plant 2004 34 0 2.10 2.00 4.05 9.00 2.53 13.00 2.42 6.00 1.71 Midlothian WaterTreatment Plant 2006 34 0 0.93 0.90 2.93 9.00 1.21 13.00 0.88 6.00 0.88 Midlothian WaterTreatment Plant 2007 35 0 1.62 1.52 2.65 9.00 1.20 13.00 2.15 7.00 1.44 
268 

Table 5: Descriptive Statistics for Raw Water Samples TCT Concentrations at AMP Monitoring Sites (MeasureSite ID Status n

Number ofNon‐detects

ArithmeticAverage

AnnualAverage

MaxValue

# 1stQtr

90‐davg 1stQtr

# 2ndQtr

90‐davg 2ndQtr

# 3rdQtr

90‐davg 3rdQtr

Midlothian WaterTreatment Plant 2008 33 0 1.78 1.68 3.08 9.00 1.42 13.00 2.17 6.00 1.62 Midlothian WaterTreatment Plant 2009 10 0 1.80 1.78 2.56 9.00 1.68 1.00 1.82 0.00 0.00 Waterwood 2010 12 0 0.70 0.64 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.61 Waterwood 2011 34 0 0.80 0.72 4.61 8.00 0.74 13.00 1.14 7.00 0.59 Waterwood 1899 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Waterwood 2010 12 0 0.70 0.64 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.61 Waxahachie WaterTreatment Plant 2003 20 0 1.53 1.36 2.51 0.00 0.00 9.00 1.23 6.00 1.86 Waxahachie WaterTreatment Plant 2004 34 0 1.23 1.15 2.30 9.00 1.53 13.00 1.53 6.00 1.00 Waxahachie WaterTreatment Plant 2006 34 0 0.66 0.61 1.68 9.00 0.33 13.00 0.91 6.00 0.68 Waxahachie WaterTreatment Plant 2007 29 0 1.10 0.96 1.91 9.00 0.72 12.00 1.62 5.00 0.78 Waxahachie WaterTreatment Plant 2008 25 0 1.67 1.45 2.30 4.00 0.77 13.00 1.80 4.00 1.67 Waxahachie WaterTreatment Plant 2009 24 0 1.50 1.36 2.22 9.00 1.43 7.00 1.63 7.00 1.37 Waxahachie WaterTreatment Plant 2010 23 0 0.64 0.66 1.81 6.00 0.57 8.00 0.65 5.00 0.89 Waxahachie WaterTreatment Plant 2011 22 0 0.70 0.68 0.80 1.00 0.62 7.00 0.63 7.00 0.71 
269