alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32**

 

Section 1350Certifications

 

----

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, the ChiefExecutive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of CommunitySouth FinancialCorporation (the “Company”), each certify that, to his knowledge on the date ofthis certification:

 

1.              The quarterly report of theCompany for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on this date (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.              The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | November 15,  2010 | By:                            | /s/  C. Allan Ducker, III |
|--------|-------------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------|
|   |                    | C.  Allan Ducker, III     |
|   |                    | Chief  Executive Officer       |
|   |                    | (Principal  Executive Officer) |
|   |                    |                           |
| Date:  | November 15,  2010 | By:                            | /s/  John W. Hobbs             |
|   |                    | John  W. Hobbs                 |
|   |                    | Chief  Financial Officer       |
|   |                    | (Principal  Financial Officer) |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Left Behind Games Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Troy Lyndon, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. Based on my knowledge, the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and  2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: July 15, 2008  By: /s/ Troy Lyndon Troy Lyndon Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Left Behind Games Inc. and will be retained by Left Behind Games Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.20

Owl Rock Technology Advisors II LLC

399 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022

 

March 23, 2022

 

Craig W. Packer

Owl Rock Technology Income Corp. 399 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10022

 

Re:	Waiver of Management Fee

 

Dear Mr. Packer,

 

Reference is hereby made to the Investment Advisory Agreement (the “Investment Advisory Agreement”), dated November 30, 2021, by and between Owl Rock Technology Income Corp. (the “Company”) and Owl Rock Technology Advisors II LLC (the “Adviser”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Investment Advisory Agreement.

 

We hereby agree to waive 100% of the Management Fee from January 1, 2022 through October 31, 2022, as calculated in accordance with the Investment Advisory Agreement.

 

No portion of the Management Fee waived shall be subject to recoupment.

 

For the avoidance of doubt, the purpose of the waiver described herein is to reduce aggregate fees payable to the Adviser by the Company for the year ended December 31, 2022.

 

 

 

 

|                                     |        |                                         |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
| Sincerely yours,                    |
|                                |
| Owl Rock Technology Advisors II LLC |
|                                |   |
| By:                                 |   |  /s/ Neena Reddy                   |
| Name:                               |   | Neena Reddy                             |
| Title:                              |   | General Counsel and Chief Legal Officer |

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

----
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22 - 0668

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. NICHOLAS WELLS,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant t o the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable David J. Grubich , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 24 2024

07/24/2024
Case Number: DA 22-0668
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1197

TAIMUR MAHMUD,

 Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: December 13, 2013 Decided: January 7, 2014

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed in part; denied in part by unpublished per curiam 

opinion.

Taimur Mahmud, Petitioner Pro Se. Aimee J. Carmichael, Jennifer 

L. Lightbody, Nicole J. Thomas-Dorris, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT 

OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Taimur Mahmud, a native and citizen of Pakistan, 

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider. We have 

reviewed the administrative record and Mahmud’s contentions and 

find that we lack jurisdiction over the claims challenging the

Board’s order of November 5, 2012 from which Mahmud failed to 

file a timely petition for review, as well as any claims that 

were not properly exhausted before the Board. See Stone v. INS, 

514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995); 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (2012). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review in part with 

respect to those claims. Next, after reviewing Mahmud’s claims 

relative to the instant order under review, we conclude that the 

Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to 

reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2013). We therefore deny 

the petition for review in part for the reasons stated by the 

Board. See In re: Mahmud, (B.I.A. Jan. 14, 2013). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART;

DENIED IN PART
SERVED AUGUST 26, 2010 

APARTMENT OF 

^lANSPORWION 

'CKHT OPERATIONS 

2010 AUG 2 1 A <^ 2 9 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

TMW CORPORATION d/b/a 

CASTLE PRECISION INDUSTRIES 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10WP0008 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS FAA-2010-0543 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "Complainant" or "agency") on 

August 3,2010, filed a Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted ("Motion"), citing 

Respondent's failure to answer its Complaint within the allotted time. Respondent 

TMW Corporation d/b/a Castle Precision Industries ("Respondent" or "TMW") has not 

answered the agency's Motion. 

Section 13.209(f) of the FAA Rules of Practice in Civil Penalty Proceedings, 14 

C.F.R. § 13.209(f), states that a party's failure to file an answer without good cause "shall 

be deemed an admission of the truth of each allegation contained in the complaint." 

Respondent is hereby required to provide a paragraph-by-paragraph answer to the 

agency's Complaint by September 7, 2010 (mailing date). If Respondent fails to do so in 

any respect, the allegations of the Complaint may be deemed admitted. 
WHEREFORE, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. On or before September 7, 2010 (mailing date). Respondent shall file a 

response to this Order stating why the relief requested in Complainant's Motion to 

Deem Allegations admitted should not be greinted; ^ 

2. On or before September 7, 2010 (mailing date). Respondent shall 

separately and completely answer Complainant's Complaint; and 

3. Absent full and complete responses to Ordering paragraphs I and 2, 

Respondent may be sanctioned by an order deeming admitted each and every 

allegation contained in Complainant's Complaint. 

Richard C. Goodwin^ 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10WP0008 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Gary Berger, President 

TMW Corporation, d/b /a Castle 

Precision Industries, Respondent 

15148 Bledsoe Street 

Sylmar,CA 91342 

TEL: 818-362-5665 

FAX: 818-367-8936 

Adam Runkel, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7.12 

Office of the Regional Cotmsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 920007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7142 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Grotmd Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73
          - [MB Docket No. 08-150; RM-11390; DA 12-512]

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; dismissal.

# SUMMARY:

The Audio Division dismisses the petition for rule making filed by KM Radio of Independence, LLC, proposing the allotment of Channel 238A at Mineral Point, Wisconsin, and the substitution of reserved Channel *254A for reserved vacant Channel *238A at Asbury, Iowa, 73 FR 50,297, and terminates the proceeding.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Deborah Dupont, Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This is a synopsis of the Commission's                     *Report and Order,*                     MB Docket No. 08-150, adopted April 2, 2012, and released April 2, 2012. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision also may be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, (800) 378-3160, or via the company's Web site,                     *www.bcpiweb.com.*                     The                     *Report and Order*                     is not subject to the Congressional Review Act, and therefore the Commission will not send a copy of it in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office,                     *see*                     U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).                

Federal Communications Commission.

Nazifa Sawez,

Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 2012-9401 Filed 4-18-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 18

- 00398

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 323rd District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 323

- 105898

- 1 7

Before Kerr, Gabriel, and Pittman, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N THE 

### I NTEREST OF 

### T.A., T.A., AND 

### T.A., C HILDREN2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered “Appellant ’ s Motion to Withdraw Appeal.” We grant the

motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: January 24 , 2019
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-15-00101-CV 

IN RE LUIS S. LAGAITE, JR., RELATOR 

 

OPINION ON ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

 

April 9, 2015 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. 

Pending before the court is the petition for writ of mandamus filed by Luis S. 

Lagaite, Jr. He asks us to order Respondent, “William Stephen, in his individual and 

official capacity as executive director of T.D.C.” to “immediately assigned [sic] relator to 

a permanent ID. Unit, and the return of all his legal and personal property, so he can 

perfect an appeal.” We deny the petition.

We cannot normally issue a writ of mandamus against anyone other than a 

judge. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (West 2004). There exists an exception to that 

limitation, however. It encompasses instances wherein mandamus is necessary to 

protect our appellate jurisdiction. In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.—

Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.). But, before it can be said that we are protecting our
2

appellate jurisdiction, there must be an appeal pending wherein the relator is a 

party. Id. Lagaite’s complaint does not relate to a pending appeal or to our jurisdiction 

over a pending appeal. Nor has he appended a copy of any judgment susceptible to 

appeal. More importantly, we read his application as simply his complaint about having 

a temporary prison assignment and as a means of securing a permanent prison 

assignment. We have no jurisdiction to require the executive director of the “T.D.C.” to 

make such an assignment. 

Accordingly, the petition for mandamus is denied. 

Per Curiam
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32-1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Lexington Precision Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K, as amended by Form 10-K/A,
for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chairman of
the Board, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the
undersigned's knowledge:

      (1)the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

      (2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                  /s/  Michael A. Lubin
                                  ---------------------------------
                                   Michael A. Lubin
                                   Chairman of the Board
                                   (Co-Principal Executive Officer)
                                   April 5, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification will not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference.
CAUSE NUMBER 03-15-00012-CR 

TREVINO DARNELL FOX X IN THE COURT OF APPEALS X 

V. X THIRD DISTRICT X 

THE STATE OF TEXAS X STATE OF TEXAS 

APPELLANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL 

TO THE HONORABLE TPHRD COURT OF APPEALS: 

COMES NOW THE APPELLANT, TREVINO DARNELL FOX, by 

and through his appointed attorney of record, Paul Evans, in the above 

entitled and numbered cause, and pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure article 42.2(a), moves this Court to DISMISS the appeal at bar. 

WHEREFORE, Appellant requests that, after proper notice is given to 

all parties to this appeal, the motion be heard and this Court enter an order 

dismissing this appeal. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Law Office of Paul M. Evans 

811 Nueces Street 

Austin, Texas 78701 

(512)569-1418 

(512) 692-8002 FAX 

pau1matthewevans@hotmail.com

ACCEPTED

03-15-00012-CR

4867876

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/13/2015 3:38:07 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/13/2015 3:38:07 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Attorney for Appellant 

Trevino 

BY:~~~ Darnell Fox 

Appellant 

Booking# 14- 34611 

3614 Bill Price Road 

Del Valle, TX 78617 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

was delivered by e-service facsimile unto the office of the prosecuting 

attorney for the State of Texas- the Travis County District Attorney, 

mailing address P.O. Box 1748, Austin, TX, 78767, physical address 509 

W. 1 ph Street, Austin, TX, 78701-on this the 131h day of April, 2015. 

/s/ Paul M. Evans 

PAULM.EVANS 

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 

I hereby certify that the present document contains 256 words, all 

contents included. 

Is/ Paul M. Evans 

PAUL M. EVANS
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1065 

To provide for a study on the use of social media in security clearance 

investigations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2019 

Mr. LYNCH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To provide for a study on the use of social media in security 

clearance investigations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Media Use in 

5 Clearance Investigations Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STUDY ON USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA IN SECURITY 

7 CLEARANCE INVESTIGATIONS. 

8 Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment 

9 of this Act, the Director of the Office of Management and 

10 Budget shall submit to Congress a report on the examinaVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:47 Feb 08, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1065.IH H1065

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1065 IH

1 tion of social media activity during security clearance in2 vestigations, including— 

3 (1) the current use of publicly available social 

4 media in security clearance background investiga5 tions; 

6 (2) any legal impediments to examining publicly 

7 available social media activity, and whether those 

8 impediments are statutory or regulatory in nature; 

9 (3) the results of any pilot programs to incor10 porate social media checks in such investigations, in11 cluding the effectiveness and cost of such programs; 

12 (4) options for widespread implementation of 

13 the examination of social media activity during such 

14 investigations; and 

15 (5) estimates on the cost for such options as 

16 part of— 

17 (A) all Top Secret investigations; or 

18 (B) all Secret and Top Secret investiga19 tions. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1083 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to redesign $20 Federal reserve 

notes so as to include a likeness of Harriet Tubman, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2019 

Mr. KATKO (for himself, Mr. CUMMINGS, Ms. SPEIER, Ms. NORTON, Mr. HIGGINS of New York, Ms. STEFANIK, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. RASKIN, 

Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. KUSTER of New Hampshire, and Mr. HURD of 

Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to redesign $20 

Federal reserve notes so as to include a likeness of 

Harriet Tubman, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Harriet Tubman Trib5 ute Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1083 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIKENESS OF HARRIET TUBMAN REQUIRED TO BE 

2 INCLUDED ON THE FACE OF $20 FEDERAL RE3 SERVE NOTES. 

4 The 8th undesignated paragraph of section 16 of the 

5 Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 418) is amended by add6 ing at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘The Secretary 

7 of the Treasury shall ensure that the face of all $20 Fed8 eral reserve notes printed after December 31, 2020, shall 

9 bear the likeness of Harriet Tubman.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS