alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Member Conflict: Metabolic Disease.                    

*Date:*                         May 4, 2012.                    

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call)                    

*Contact Person:*                         Krish Krishnan, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6164, MSC 7892, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1041,                         *krishnak@csr.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 10, 2012.

Anna P. Snouffer,

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-9118 Filed 4-16-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
H. Con. Res. 87 Agreed to March 12, 2020

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is 

authorized to be used on April 21, 2020, for a ceremony as part 

of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of 

the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be 

carried out in accordance with such conditions as the Architect 

of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
MM.GfWtHi -'• :. • ••• I AN •; .;.;.-•

«SBl£- ASM:, cv£wft of covVnx _/-" ! :- CM

^K(\ M\\0<\\0 l3L '1bi-<D^ Wbl

kftkCft€& VfciittO K CoH of \ VJEVTCJh K KWOOyKM VftW hfepvit. CfcsAS&S \v\\-

* lAo^Vp^x , -\bo> e. ffoXOb€Jhtr\ We. j3SL. 'baft ,151Yi ; "1(D(D (\. SL cAk*t\^ ^-i S^,

c

100 ^ Oo^VkV <b\.

SN(\ ^o(V\o^.^W

cc : MfMJHft
KKotufcH IA '• JkA

V&* UWH of W\ik\S Mto&ta*flrt-YV<wV»-cta

(Ah. ftortfeto-ff:

*fc COM » htNit^Xt Mfe ^ dm. AKMbMlfc NO "AC ^fc C*»* **| I

tt STO& *tTUl\K(\^t^ f.o m W\kV c*fcf\ ?ota k »foA \n\»\'v ri

y*A«\ \& ta*tv\ cocws c* «t*» *«& •«** WKc * * ri»*W ^ *t *f*»

c* K<Ktafe$ '1 Ota,***, \A, fo,Vh\A Goxttitf of MtCiltVb tf&A *\X Ct*nk«it \<&*%m*

\ ItikA Hou \ffc*\c*t<* ^ feu^ cooks ctf MKNJSi tfkMfe o^ "tifo^&l&

\o A\\& \V\\K\. <ux*m fata k 6&A \n\^,Vs

"7
V&rifcV Q0Vn©So<\te\C£\

JRIO QRAf^OE MSTISSCT

Ol APR 201S PM 3 1 ^

4th Court of Appeals

Criminal Justice Center

300 Dolorosa

San Antonio, Texas 78205

'8205303799 ',",,,l'H'i''J.|%|.l»,}jI,I,|jJ,|„,,1,„VJlj||lil;jl/1||

....
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2041

CHRISTOS D. DEDES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

VIRGINIA STATE BAR; JANE ALLEN FLETCHER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(MISC 98-11-3)

Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 3, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christos D. Dedes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

July 2, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered

on the docket sheet on July 16, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and

79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that

the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. Wilson v. Murray,

806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Christos D. Dedes appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action for failure to comply with a prefiling injunction.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See Dedes v. Virginia State

Bar, No. MISC 98-11-3 (E.D. Va. July 16, 1998).* We deny leave to

appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 10, 2015

No. 04-15-00076-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.E.Y., A CHILD,

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-02744

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

David Zarate's notification of late reporter's record is hereby NOTED.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IGJ 

I KAR D G 0 L D EN J 0 N ES PC 

June 16, 2015 

Via e-:filing 

Third Court of Appeals 

209 West 14th Street, Room 10i 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Re: Cause No. 03-13-00790-CV, Trial Court No. D-1-GN-07-002328; T. Mark 

Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted M Anderson, and Christine 

Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted M Anderson v. Richard T. Archer, 

David R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V Archer, Karen Archer Ball, and 

Sherri Archer, In the Court of Appeals for the Third District of Texas at Austin, 

Texas 

Dear Clerk: 

Please be advised that Laurie Ratliff will be out of the office starting August 3 through August 

14, 2015. We would appreciate your consideration in not setting oral argument during this time 

period. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. 

Very truly yours, 

~ LR/tm 

CC: Clients 

Gerald McFarlen, via e-mail 

T:\ARCHER 3 2007 TORTIOUS rNTERFERENCE\APPEAL\CORRESPONDENCE\2015-06-1 6 LR Vacation !tr.doc 

400 West 15th St. I Su ite 975 I Austin , TX 78701 I T 512 472 6695 I F 512 472 3669 I igjlaw.com 

ACCEPTED

03-13-00790-CV

5695578

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

6/16/2015 1:47:02 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/16/2015 1:47:02 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ANGELA FAYE STOLDT, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D21-760

LT Case No. 2013-101064-CFDL

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

 Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed July 5, 2022 

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Volusia County, 

James R. Clayton, Judge. 

Angela Stoldt, Ocala, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

LAMBERT, C.J., WALLIS and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of ZAGG Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert G. Pedersen II, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, ,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ ROBERT G. PEDERSEN IIRobert G. Pedersen IIChief Executive OfficerAugust 10, 2010
>3&'0)

EL PASO COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY

601 E. Overland St.

El Paso, Texas 79901

Date: 04/05/2015 ^3^^»

Office oftheClerk k?R

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals v C»I0

P.O. Box 12308; Capitol Station

Austin, tx. 78711 ***!Acosta, Qerk

Attn: Abel Acosta, Clerk

Re: Writ No. WR-82-545-01

Dear Mr. Acosta;

In February, 2015 I forwarded a letter to your office notifying the Texas Court of

Criminal Appeals of my "intent to take-up supervisory writs with the Texas Supreme Court from

a February 18, 2015 adverse" decision denying, without written reasons, my writ of mandamus

seeking to "compel" the District Court Judge in my case to "act" upon an October 17, 2014

pending "non-suspendable" (and "prompt response required") "writ of habeas corpus"

(T.C.Cr.P. Art. 11.07). Additonally, Irequested a copyof the entire record regarding this matter

in order to "perfect" a proper writ application for the Texas State Supreme Court.

Upon further legal research, I have discovered that, the "writ of habeas corpus" is NOT

purely and, thus, not "plainly" a "civil action" and, that the Texas Supreme court, pursuant to

Gov't code Sections 22.001-22.002, DOES NOT have jurisdiction over criminal cases and does

NOT review decisions issued by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

This being the law in Texas, the February 18, 2015 decision issued by the Texas Court of

Criminal Appeals constitutes an "exhaustion" of all available State remedies in Texas. It would

be "pointless" to seek discretiionary review of the decision rendered by the Court of Criminal

Appeals since their decision was FINAL when it denied mandamus relief in this critical matter.

(Tex Rules of Appellate Proc. 68.3).

Be advised that the Federal District Court of competent jurisdiction (USDC-WDT-ELP

DIV) will have jurisdiction over this subject matter, pursuant to 28 USC 2254 and 2255, via,

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. In order to "perfect" this petition, the entire record from

the Court of Criminal Appeals in this matter must be furnished to me as soon as possible.

Your prompt attention and response will be sincerely appreciated. Thank you for your

cooperation.

Respectfully submitted,

MF: tAUAuuL £&rvu)*vukvz

xc: Alfredo Chavez, Esq. MICHAEL FERNANDEZ

File EPCDF No. 9579081; Loc.6-40
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                  341,748,000
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                 51,511,000
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      40,809,000
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                    14,762,000
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             448,830,000
<COMMON>                                    14,425,000
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                   46,355,000
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                        121,562,000
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>             182,342,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                       166,069,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             618,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                1,405,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              98,396,000
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>              448,830,000
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                  149,817,000
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                        10,737,000
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 107,655,000
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                 118,392,000
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                     31,425,000
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                           8,360,000
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>              39,785,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    14,195,000
<NET-INCOME>                                25,590,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>               25,590,000
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    19,312,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                   13,401,000
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                      45,290,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.78
        

</TABLE>
391 A.2d 686

#### Commonwealth v. Johnson, Appellant.

Submitted March 20, 1978.

Paul Messing, Assistant Defender, and Benjamin Lerner, Defender, for appellant; Arthur Lee Dixon, Assistant District Attorney, and F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

SPAETH, J.,

dissented. Compare this case (56 bags, no evidence of degree of dilution) with *Commonwealth v. Santi*
      *608
      *ago,*462 Pa. 216, 340 A.2d 440 (1975) (25 packets, 17 bundles, half pound of heroin, and cutting and packaging equipment); *Commonwealth v. Hill,*236 Pa.Super. 572, 346 A.2d 314 (1975) (45 half spoon packets of heroin, 11 packets of cocaine, packaging equipment, and large amount of cash); *Commonwealth v. Wright,*234 Pa.Super. 83, 339 A.2d 103 (1975) (possession of 25 packets by defendant proved not to be user); *Commonwealth v. Brown,*232 Pa.Super. 463, 335 A.2d 782 (1975) (expert testimony that 71 packets were bundled as seller would do).
Lentils (total)

Count Defects IADM FM

754 Min: 0.0 0.0 0.0

Max: 34.2 0.9 10.1

Avg: 1.29 0.05 0.17

US #1 US #2 US #3 SG

527 141 19 67

69.9% 18.7% 2.5% 8.9%

401 IADM results certified

Lentils (12/64)

Count Defects IADM FM

412 Min: 0.0 0.0 0.0

Max: 34.2 0.5 10.1

Avg: 1.48 0.05 0.11

US #1 US #2 US #3 SG

315 56 10 31

76.5% 13.6% 2.4% 7.5%

123 IADM results certified

Lentils (9/64)

Count Defects IADM FM

338 Min: 0.0 0.0 0.0

Max: 10.1 0.9 5.6

Avg: 1.07 0.05 0.24

US #1 US #2 US #3 SG

210 85 9 34

62.1% 25.1% 2.7% 10.1%

278 IADM results certified

FAQ Summary - 2023

9/22/2023

Lentils (7/64)

Count Defects IADM FM

4 Min: 0.1 0.0

Max: 1.1 3.5

Avg: 0.55 1.08

US #1 US #2 US #3 SG

2 - - 2

50.0% 50.0%

No IADM result certified
SYDP

Weevil Damage OCL Bleach CR

Min: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Max: 6.8 29.9 17.5 1.4 46.0

Avg: 0.05 1.04 0.21 0.03 2.36

Count US #1 US #2 US #3 SG

962 566 145 108 143

58.8% 15.1% 11.2% 14.9%

SGDP

Weevil Damage OCL Bleach CR

Min: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Max: 33.9 27.6 8.9 44.3 20.6

Avg: 1.17 0.97 0.09 1.84 1.64

Count US #1 US #2 US #3 SG

473 209 68 51 145

44.2% 14.4% 10.8% 30.6%

MOTTLED DRY PEAS

Weevil Damage OCL CR

Min: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Max: 14.8 6.1 23.2 2.5

Avg: 2.69 0.36 0.40 0.52

Count US #1 US #2 US #3 US SG

61 37 7 4 13

60.6% 11.5% 6.6% 21.3%

Chickpeas (Garbanzo Bean)

(TOTAL)

Count #1 #2 #3 SS

773 680 57 19 17

88.0% 7.4% 2.4% 2.2%

Damage Splits

Min: 0.0 0.0

Max: 38.9 20.7

Avg: 1.10 1.96

Grade results based on Damage only, not Total Defects
Chickpeas (Garbanzo Bean)

(18/64)

Count #1 #2 #3 SS

605 516 54 18 17

85.3% 8.9% 3.0% 2.8%

Damage Splits

Min: 0.0 0.0

Max: 38.9 20.7

Avg: 1.30 2.04

Grade results based on Damage only, not Total Defects

Chickpeas (Garbanzo Bean)

(16/64)

Count #1 #2 #3 SS

168 164 3 1 -

97.6% 1.8% 0.6% -

Damage Splits

Min: 0 0.1

Max: 4.8 12.9

Avg: 0.40 1.67

Grade results based on Damage only, not Total Defects
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #14-2004 L.P. (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Matthew A.
      JonesName:
            Matthew
      A. JonesTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            November
      16, 2009
# C_2004094EN.01003306.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/33

---

Removal from the register of Case C-374/01 (1)

1

(2004/C 94/79)

By order of 28 January 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case C-374/01: Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

---

(1)  OJ C 317 of 10.11.2001.

1

---
Order filed, November 03, 2015

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00890

- CV

____________ IN THE ESTATE OF EUG ENE FROST, DECEASED , Appellant

On Appeal from the Probate Court Galveston County, Texas Tr ial Court Cause No. PR

- 0075472



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due October 19, 2015

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The record has not been filed with the court. Beca use the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order John Partain , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SIXTH DISTRICT, AT TEXARKANA

No. 06-14-00068-CV

In the Interest of Z.M., W.M., and L.M., Children

(No. 14-00010 IN 276TH DISTRICT COURT OF MARION COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

REPORTER'S RECORD

CLERK'S RECORD

FILING

$10.00

$10.00

$3,345.00

$0.00

$195.00

EXEMPT

EXEMPT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

DEPT OF FAMILY & PROTECTIVE SERVICES

DEPT OF FAMILY & PROTECTIVE SERVICES

JAMES FINSTROM, APPT ATTY

JAMES FINSTROM, APPT ATTY

JAMES FINSTROM, APPT ATTY

Balance of costs owing to the Sixth Court of Appeals, Texarkana, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK OF THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE 

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct 

copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF 

TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, 

as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, 

witness my hand and the Seal of 

the COURT OF APPEALS for 

the Sixth District of Texas, this 

April 9, 2015.

DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK

By ___________________________

Deputy
## IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________



### m 00-50223

_______________



### R OBERT 

### S TOVALL 

### , Plaintiff,



### J ARY 

### M. G ANSKE AND 

### S HIRLEY 

### B. G ANSKE 

### ,
Intervenor PlaintiffsCounter DefendantsAppellees,

VERSUS



### WRS G ROUP 

### , L TD 

### .,

AND 

### D ONNA 

### S PENCE 

### , I NDEPENDENT E XECUTOR OF THE E STATE OF W AYMAN R. S PENCE , D ECEASED ,



### DefendantsIntervenor DefendantsCounter PlaintiffsAppellants,



### S COTT 

### S ALMANS 

### , Defendant-Appellant.



### _________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (W-99-CV-239)



### _________________________ January 3, 20012

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before POLITZ, SMITH, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The petition for rehearing is GRANTED IN PART. The opinion issued on December 7, 2000, is WITHDRAWN, and the following is substituted:

This is essentially a disput e over whether certain matters were settled with finalit y. We ha ve reviewed the briefs, the record, and the applicable law and have heard and considered the oral arguments of counsel.

We conclude t hat t he matters in dispute

were in fact settled by release. Moreover, appellants have failed to demonstrate a material issue of fact with respect to their contract claim. The district court correctly entered a take-nothing judgment and denied the intervenors’ claims as moot.

AFFIRMED.

In all other respects, the petition for rehearing is DENIED.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the cou rt has d etermined that this opinion should n ot be published and is no t precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth i n 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5.4.