42436 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (Air) 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 

40113, 40120, E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Y, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 6, 2014, and 

effective September 15, 2014, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace. 

* * * * * 

AGL OH D Columbus, Ohio State 

University Airport, OH [Amended] 

Columbus, Ohio State University Airport, OH 

(Lat. 40°04′47′′ N., long. 83°04′23′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from the 

surface to and including 3,400 feet MSL 

within a 4-mile radius of Ohio State 

University Airport, excluding that airspace 

within the Port Columbus International 

Airport, OH, Class C airspace area. This Class 

D airspace area is effective during the 

specific dates and times established in 

advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective 

dates and times will thereafter be 

continuously published in the Airport/

Facility Directory. 

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas 

Designated As A Surface Area. 

* * * * * 

AGL OH E4 Columbus, Ohio State 

University Airport, OH [Removed] 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth. 

* * * * * 

AGL OH E5 Columbus, OH [Amended] 

Columbus, Port Columbus International 

Airport, OH 

(Lat. 39°59′49′′ N., long. 82°53′32′′ W.) 

Columbus, Rickenbacker International 

Airport, OH 

(Lat. 39°48′50′′ N., long. 82°55′40′′ W.) 

Columbus, Ohio State University Airport, OH 

(Lat. 40°04′47′′ N., long. 83°04′23′′ W.) 

Columbus, Bolton Field Airport, OH 

(Lat. 39°54′04′′ N., long. 83°08′13′′ W.) 

Columbus, Darby Dan Airport, OH 

(Lat. 39°56′31′′ N., long. 83°12′18′′ W.) 

Lancaster, Fairfield County Airport, OH 

(Lat. 39°45′20′′ N., long. 82°39′26′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius 

of Port Columbus International Airport, and 

within 3.3 miles either side of the 094° 

bearing from Port Columbus International 

Airport extending from the 7-mile radius to 

12.1 miles east of the airport, and within a 

7-mile radius of Rickenbacker International 

Airport, and within 4 miles either side of the 

045° bearing from Rickenbacker International 

Airport extending from the 7-mile radius to 

12.5 miles northeast of the airport, and 

within a 6.5-mile radius of Ohio State 

University Airport, and within a 7.4-mile 

radius of Bolton Field Airport, and within a 

6.4-mile radius of Fairfield County Airport, 

and within a 6.5-mile radius of Darby Dan 

Airport, excluding that airspace within the 

London, OH, Class E airspace area. 

Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on July 7, 2015. 

Robert W. Beck, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO 

Central Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2015–17487 Filed 7–16–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2015–0842; Airspace 

Docket No. 15–ACE–2] 

Proposed Amendment of Class E 

Airspace for the following Missouri 

towns: Chillicothe, MO; Cuba, MO; 

Farmington, MO; Lamar, MO; Mountain 

View, MO; Nevada, MO; and Poplar 

Bluff, MO 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

amend Class E airspace at Chillicothe 

Municipal Airport, Chillicothe, MO; 

Cuba Municipal Airport, Cuba, MO; 

Farmington Regional Airport, 

Farmington, MO; Lamar Municipal 

Airport, Lamar, MO; Mountain View 

Airport, Mountain View, MO; Nevada 

Municipal Airport, Nevada, MO; and 

Poplar Bluff Municipal Airport, Poplar 

Bluff, MO. Decommissioning of the nondirectional radio beacons (NDB) and/or 

cancellation of NDB approaches due to 

advances in Global Positioning System 

(GPS) capabilities has made this action 

necessary for the safety and 

management of Instrument Flight Rules 

(IFR) operations at the above airports. 

Geographic coordinates are also 

adjusted at Lamar Municipal Airport, 

Lamar, MO; and Nevada Municipal 

Airport, Nevada, MO. 

DATES: 0901 UTC. Comments must be 

received on or before August 31, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposal to the U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

Washington, DC. 20590–0001. You must 

identify the docket number FAA–2015– 

0842/Airspace Docket No. 15–ACE–2, at 

the beginning of your comments. You 

may also submit comments through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received, and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office between 

9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

The Docket Office (telephone 1–800– 

647–5527), is on the ground floor of the 

building at the above address. 

FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, and 

subsequent amendments can be viewed 

online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/ 

publications/. The Order is also 

available for inspection at the National 

Archives and Records Administration 

(NARA). For information on the 

availability of this material at NARA, 

call 202–741–6030, or go to http://

www.archives.gov/federal_register/

code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_

locations.html. 

FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, is 

published yearly and effective on 

September 15. For further information, 

you can contact the Airspace Policy and 

Regulations Group, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW., Washington, DC, 20591; 

telephone: 202–267–8783. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Roger Waite, Central Service Center, 

Operations Support Group, Federal 

Aviation Administration, Southwest 

Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort 

Worth, TX 76137; telephone: (817) 321– 

7652. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, 

Section 106 describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the agency’s 

authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in Subtitle VII, Part A, 

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules 42437 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority as it would 

amend controlled airspace at the 

Missouri airports listed in this NPRM. 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments, as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers and be submitted in 

triplicate to the address listed above. 

Commenters wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this notice must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed, stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to 

Docket No. FAA–2015–0842/Airspace 

Docket No. 15–ACE–2.’’ The postcard 

will be date/time stamped and returned 

to the commenter. 

Availability of NPRMs 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Recently published rulemaking 

documents can also be accessed through 

the FAA’s Web page at http://

www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_

traffic/publications/airspace_

amendments/. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and 

5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. An informal 

docket may also be examined during 

normal business hours at the office of 

the Central Service Center, 2601 

Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137. 

Persons interested in being placed on 

a mailing list for future NPRMs should 

contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking 

(202) 267–9677, to request a copy of 

Advisory Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking Distribution 

System, which describes the application 

procedure. 

Availability and Summary of 

Documents Proposed for Incorporation 

by Reference 

This document proposes to amend 

FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

dated August 6, 2014, and effective 

September 15, 2014. FAA Order 

7400.9Y is publicly available as listed in 

the ADDRESSES section of this proposed 

rule. FAA Order 7400.9Y lists Class A, 

B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic 

service routes, and reporting points. 

The Proposal 

This action proposes to amend Title 

14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 

CFR), Part 71 by modifying Class E 

airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface for standard 

instrument approach procedures (SIAP) 

at Chillicothe Municipal Airport, 

Chillicothe, MO; Cuba Municipal 

Airport, Cuba, MO; Farmington 

Regional Airport, Farmington, MO; 

Lamar Municipal Airport, Lamar, MO; 

Mountain View Airport, Mountain 

View, MO; Nevada Municipal Airport, 

Nevada, MO; and Poplar Bluff 

Municipal Airport, Poplar Bluff, MO. 

Also, Class E airspace extending upward 

from the surface would be amended at 

Farmington Regional Airport, 

Farmington, MO. Airspace 

reconfiguration is necessary due to the 

decommissioning of NDBs and/or 

cancellation of the NDB approach at 

each airport. Controlled airspace is 

necessary for the safety and 

management of IFR operations for SIAPs 

at the airports. Geographic coordinates 

also would be adjusted for Lamar 

Municipal Airport, Lamar, MO; Nevada 

Municipal Airport, Nevada, MO; and 

Poplar Bluff Municipal Airport, Poplar 

Bluff, MO, to coincide with the FAAs 

aeronautical database. 

Class E airspace areas are published 

in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 

7400.9Y, dated August 6, 2014, and 

effective September 15, 2014, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designation 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

Regulatory Notices and Analyses 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. It, 

therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under Executive 

Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant 

rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies 

and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 

26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant 

preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation 

as the anticipated impact is so minimal. 

Since this is a routine matter that will 

only affect air traffic procedures and air 

navigation, it is certified that this rule, 

when promulgated, will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1E, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (Air) 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 

40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Y, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 6, 2014, and 

effective September 15, 2014, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace 

Designated as Surface Areas 

* * * * * 

ACE MO E2 Farmington, MO [Amended] 

Farmington Regional Airport, MO 

(Lat. 37°45′40′′ N., long. 90°25′43′′ W.) 

Within a 3.9-mile radius of Farmington 

Regional Airport and within 1.7 miles each 

side of the 202° bearing from the airport 

extending from the 3.9-mile radius to 4 miles 

south of the airport. 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace areas 

extending upward from 700 feet or more 

above the surface of the earth. 

* * * * * 

ACE MO E5 Chillicothe, MO [Amended] 

Chillicothe Municipal Airport, MO 

(Lat. 39°46′56′′ N., long. 93°29′44′′ W.) 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

42438 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.9-mile 

radius of Chillicothe Municipal Airport. 

* * * * * 

ACE MO E5 Cuba, MO [Amended] 

Cuba Municipal Airport, MO 

(Lat. 38°04′08′′ N., long. 91°25′44′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.3-mile 

radius of the Cuba Municipal Airport. 

* * * * * 

ACE MO E5 Farmington, MO [Amended] 

Farmington Regional Airport, MO 

(Lat. 37°45′40′′ N., long. 90°25′43′′ W.) 

Farmington VORTAC 

(Lat. 37°40′24′′ N., long. 90°14′03′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile 

radius of Farmington Regional Airport, and 

within 4 miles each side of the 204° bearing 

from the airport extending from the 6.4-mile 

radius to 11.5 miles southwest of the airport, 

and within 1.3 miles each side of the 

Farmington VORTAC 300° radial extending 

from the 6.4-mile radius of the airport to the 

VORTAC. 

* * * * * 

ACE MO E5 Lamar, MO [Amended] 

Lamar Municipal Airport, MO 

(Lat. 37°29′10′′ N., long. 94°18′43′′W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.3-mile 

radius of Lamar Municipal Airport. 

* * * * * 

ACE MO E5 Mountain View, MO 

[Amended] 

Mountain View Airport, MO 

(Lat. 36°59′34′′ N., long. 91°42′52′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile 

radius of Mountain View Airport. 

* * * * * 

ACE MO E5 Nevada, MO [Amended] 

Nevada Municipal Airport, MO 

(Lat. 37°51′09′′ N., long. 94°18′17′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.6-mile 

radius of Nevada Municipal Airport. 

* * * * * 

ACE MO E5 Poplar Bluff, MO [Amended] 

Poplar Bluff Municipal Airport, MO 

(Lat. 36°46′26′′ N., long. 90°19’30′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile 

radius of Poplar Bluff Municipal Airport. 

Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on July 7, 2015 

Robert W. Beck 

Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO 

Central Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2015–17501 Filed 7–16–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION 

16 CFR Part 1251 

[Docket No. CPSC–2011–0081] 

Toys: Determination Regarding Heavy 

Elements Limits for Unfinished and 

Untreated Wood 

AGENCY: U.S. Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Consumer Product Safety 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘CPSC’’) 

is proposing to determine that 

unfinished and untreated trunk wood 

does not contain heavy elements that 

would exceed the limits specified in the 

Commission’s toy standard, ASTM 

F963–11. Based on this proposed 

determination, unfinished and 

untreated trunk wood in toys would not 

require third party testing. In the ‘‘Rules 

and Regulations’’ section of this Federal 

Register, the Commission is issuing this 

determination as a direct final rule. If 

we receive no significant adverse 

comment in response to the direct final 

rule, we will not take further action on 

this proposed rule. 

DATES: Submit comments by August 17, 

2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by Docket No. CPSC–2011– 

0081, by any of the following methods: 

Electronic Submissions: Submit 

electronic comments to the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal at: 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

The Commission does not accept 

comments submitted by electronic mail 

(email), except through 

www.regulations.gov. The Commission 

encourages you to submit electronic 

comments by using the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal, as described above. 

Written Submissions: Submit written 

submissions by mail/hand delivery/

courier to: Office of the Secretary, 

Consumer Product Safety Commission, 

Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, 

Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301) 

504–7923. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name and 

docket number for this notice. All 

comments received may be posted 

without change, including any personal 

identifiers, contact information, or other 

personal information provided, to: 

www.regulations.gov. Do not submit 

confidential business information, trade 

secret information, or other sensitive or 

protected information that you do not 

want to be available to the public. If 

furnished at all, such information 

should be submitted in writing. 

Docket: For access to the docket to 

read background documents or 

comments received, go to: 

www.regulations.gov, and insert the 

docket number CPSC–2011–0081, into 

the ‘‘Search’’ box, and follow the 

prompts. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Randy Butturini, Project Manager, 

Office of Hazard Identification and 

Reduction U.S. Consumer Product 

Safety Commission, 4330 East West 

Hwy, Room 814, Bethesda, MD 20814; 

301–504–7562: email; rbutturini@

cpsc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Along 

with this proposed rule, CPSC is 

publishing a direct final rule in the 

‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this 

issue of the Federal Register. This direct 

final rule establishes a determination 

that unfinished and untreated trunk 

wood does not contain heavy elements 

that would exceed the heavy elements 

limits specified in the Commission’s 

mandatory toy standard, ASTM F963– 

11. Based on this determination, 

unfinished and untreated trunk wood in 

toys does not require third party testing. 

CPSC did not issue a proposed rule 

before today because CPSC believes that 

this action is not controversial and 

CPSC does not expect significant 

adverse comment. CPSC has explained 

the reasons for the determination in the 

direct final rule. Unless CPSC receives 

significant adverse comment regarding 

the determination during the comment 

period, the direct final rule in this issue 

of the Federal Register will become 

effective September 15, 2015, and CPSC 

will not take further action on this 

proposal. If CPSC receives a significant 

adverse comment, CPSC will publish a 

document in the Federal Register 

withdrawing the direct final rule, and 

the rule will not take effect. CPSC will 

then respond to public comments in a 

later final rule, based on this proposed 

rule. CPSC does not intend to institute 

a second comment period on this action. 

Parties interested in commenting on this 

determination must do so at this time. 

For additional information, please see 

the direct final rule published in the 

‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this 

issue of the Federal Register. 

Dated: July 13, 2015. 

Todd A. Stevenson, 

Secretary, Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2015–17414 Filed 7–16–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6355–01–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS