alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Attendee Report GoToWebinar

Webinar Name Webinar ID ASRAC Commercial HVAC, CRE, and WH Working Group: Meeting and Webinar 912250584 Actual Start Date/Time Actual Duration (minutes) Sep 12, 2013 07:53 AM EDT 323 Total Attended 25 

# Session Details First Name Last Name Email CountryAddress City StateOrganization Zip Code Rodney Beever US491 E. Princess St. York PA United CoolAir Corp. 17403 Joshua Cocciardi US 1000 INDEPENDENCE AVE SWWASHINGTON DC DEPT. OF ENERGY 20585 Hank Edmunds US5005 York Drive Norman OK Johnson Controls 73069 Marshall Hunt US245 Market Street San Francisco CA PG&E 94177 Diane Jakobs US5600 Old Greenwood Road Fort Smith AR Rheem Heating & Cooling 72917 brian jeanes US 908 hwy 15 north new albany MS master-bilt.com 38652 Stephen Kowalski US2701 Wilma Rudolph Blvd. Clarksville TN Ingersoll Rand - Trane 37040 bill larson US 727 second street hudson WI Norlake 54016 Patricia McCarthy US 899 Bridgeport Ave Shelton CT Xylem - Water Solutions 06484 John McLaughlin US4900 Tech Blvd Auburn NY Daikin McQuay 13021 David Mecadon US539 Dunksferry Rd. Bensalem PA National Refrigeration and Air Conditioning19020 john morris US539 dunksferry rd bensalem PA Continental Refrigerator 19020 Frank Myers US 3209 Galvez Ave Fort Worth TX PVI Industries, LLC 76111 David Ransom US500 North Capitol Street, NWWashington DC MWE 20155 Joe Sanders US4401 Blue Mound Rd. Fort Worth TX Traulsen 76106 Ron Shebik US 12999 St. Charles Rock RoadBridgeton MO Hussmann 63044 Amy Shepherd US2111 Wilson Blvd. Ste. 500 Arlington VA AHRI 22205 Louis Starr US421 sw 6th suite 600 Portland OR NEEA 97217 Dean Swofford US 1925 Ruffin Mill Rd Colonial Heights VA Hillphoenix 23834 Eric Truskoski US200 Lafayette St. Middleville MI Bradford White Corporation 49333 Tom Walsh US4900 tech park blvd Auburn NY Daikin McQuay 13021 kevin washington US 1250 conn ave nw washington DC itw 20036 Robert Whitwell US Carrier Parkway Syracuse NY Carrier 13221 Linda Wilson US 120 Broadway NY NY NYS oag 10271 Michael Woodford US2111 Wilson Blvd. Arlington VA AHRI 22201 

# General Information
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 97 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 97

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
limit the composition of the Senate to Senators from States admitted to 
         the Union prior to the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2020

Mr. Walker submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
limit the composition of the Senate to Senators from States admitted to 
         the Union prior to the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``The Senate of the United States shall be composed of Senators who 
are from States admitted to the Union prior to the One Hundred 
Sixteenth Congress.''.
                                 <all>
```
United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service

Federal Grain Inspection Service

Administrative Directive FGIS 4610.2 February 18, 1982

Distribution: FGIS, OSP, Industry Originating Office: FMD

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in its programs on the basis of race, color, 

national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, and marital or familial status. (Not all prohibited 

bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternate means for communication of program 

information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and 

TDD).

To file a complaint, write to the USDA, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, 

Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal employment opportunity 

employer.

Rotation of Personnel

Contents

Rotation of Personnel ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1

1. PURPOSE����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

2. POLICY ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

3. PROCEDURES AND DOCUMENTATION ���������������������������������������������������������������������������
FGIS Directive 4610.2 February 18, 1982

Page 2

1. PURPOSE

This instruction establishes the Federal Grain Inspection Service’s (FGIS) policy for 

rotating personnel assigned to specific locations for specified periods of time.

2. POLICY

Section 8(f) of the U.S. Grain Standards Act, as amended, states, “The Administrator 

shall provide for the periodic rotation of supervisory personnel and official inspection 

personnel employed by the Service as he deems necessary to preserve the integrity of 

the official inspection and weighing system provided by the Act.”

3. PROCEDURES AND DOCUMENTATION

FGIS personnel assigned to elevators and/or other locations shall be rotated. Personnel

assignments to a specific location shall not exceed 6 months. The filed office supervisor 

may extend assignments for selected personnel, provided the approval for the extension 

is documented in writing and placed in the files.

Rotation schedules should be prepared so that approximately one-third of the personnel 

at each location are rotated each time and so that each position is filled with trained 

and qualified personnel. For example, personnel performing protein functions should be 

rotated only when a trained and qualified replacement is available. Rotating personnel 

in this manner will ensure that the work force is proficient and familar with the operating 

procedures of the facility

Copies of schedules shall be maintained on file for review at a later date.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Dominick Grimaldi, Appellant, v Warden, C-95, Rikers Island, et al., Respondents.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Burton Hecht, J.), rendered on November 13, 1990, dismissing the Petition for a writ of *habeas corpus,*unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Upon examination of the record, we find no basis for interfering with the discretion of the Parole Board in revoking Petitioner’s parole and returning him to custody as there was ample evidence in the record to sustain the Board’s determination *(People ex rel. Van Fossen v Dillon,*72 AD2d 166, 168).

It is well settled that actions by the Board of Parole are judicial functions and are not reviewable if performed in accordance with law (Executive Law § 259-i [5]; *People ex rel. Van Fossen v Dillon, supra,*at 168).

Specifically, the record at the final parole revocation hear*498ing reveals that the Petitioner’s accomplice, Dominick Faraci, credibly testified that during the period from November of 1988 to March of 1989 he made a series of purchases of the narcotic drug cocaine from the Petitioner, who knew that Faraci had a criminal history. The record reveals that Petitioner’s counsel had an ample opportunity to cross-examine Faraci.

Moreover, there is no statutory basis for Petitioner’s claim that he was entitled to *Brady*material and corroboration of accomplice Faraci’s testimony pursuant to CPL 60.22 (1) since the Criminal Procedure Law, in this instance, has no application to parole revocation hearings, which have been deemed administrative in nature *(People ex rel. Maiello v New York State Bd. of Parole,*65 NY2d 145, 147; *People ex rel. Piccarillo v New York State Bd. of Parole,*48 NY2d 76, 80). Thus, the Hearing Officer could credit the accomplice’s testimony although unsupported by corroborative evidence within the meaning of CPL 60.22 (1) *(Matter of Berenhaus v Ward,*70 NY2d 436, 443).

Finally, we find that the transcripts of the proceedings satisfied the statutory requirement of a "verbatim record”, thereby making possible meaningful judicial review to determine if the actions of the Board were, in fact, in accordance with law (Executive Law § 259-i [6]; *Matter of Collins v Hammock,*96 AD2d 733, 734).

We have reviewed the Petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.
Filed: April 27, 2005

PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-4253

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MOHAMAD YOUSSEF HAMMOUD, a/k/a Ali Abousaleh,

a/k/a Ali Albousaleh,

Defendant - Appellant,

_____________________________________________

CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS; NATIONAL

COALITION TO PROTECT POLITICAL FREEDOM;

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE

LAWYERS; NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD,

Amici Supporting Appellant.

ORDER

_______________

This court, sitting en banc, previously affirmed Mohamad

Youssef Hammoud’s convictions and sentence. See United States v.

Hammoud, 381 F.3d 316 (4th Cir. 2004) (en banc). Subsequently, the

Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated our decision, and

remanded for reconsideration in light of United States v. Booker,
125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). See United States v. Hammoud, 125 S. Ct.

1051 (2005).

Because the order of the Supreme Court does not affect our

resolution of Hammoud’s challenges to his convictions and the

calculation of his guideline range, we reinstate those portions of

our prior opinion. See Hammoud, 381 F.3d at 325-44, 354-57.

However, the sentence imposed on Hammoud exceeded the maximum

sentence authorized by the jury verdict alone, see United States v.

Hughes, No. 03-4172, 2005 WL 628224, at *5 (4th Cir. Mar. 16,

2005), and the Government cannot prove that this error, which

Hammoud preserved in the district court, did not affect Hammoud’s

substantial rights, see Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(a). We therefore

vacate Hammoud’s sentence and remand for resentencing under the

advisory guidelines regime set forth in Booker, 125 S. Ct. at 756-

57, 764-65.

Entered at the direction of Chief Judge Wilkins with the

concurrences of Judges Widener, Wilkinson, Niemeyer, Williams,

Michael, Motz, Traxler, King, Gregory, Shedd, and Duncan.

 For the Court

/s/ Patricia S. Connor

 Clerk
June 29, 2015

Mr. David Topping

The Topping Group

77 Madeira Court

St. Charles, MO 63304

Dear Mr. Topping:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your March 9, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0670), 

but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not 

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any 

further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or                15 (d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                Freddie M. Kotek    |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Freddie                M. Kotek        |
| Title: | Chief                Executive Officer |
| Date:  | November                14, 2005       |
|   |                                   |

----
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 36 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating 

to parental rights. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 30, 2019 

Mr. BANKS (for himself, Mr. MOONEY of West Virginia, Mr. POSEY, Mrs. 

HARTZLER, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. BABIN, Mr. OLSON, Mr. 

WATKINS, Mrs. LESKO, Mr. WRIGHT, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. BUDD, Mr. 

LAMALFA, Mr. YOHO, and Mr. WALBERG) submitted the following joint 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relating to parental rights. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 36 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The liberty of parents to direct the up3 bringing, education, and care of their children is a funda4 mental right. 

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. The parental right to direct education 

6 includes the right to choose, as an alternative to public 

7 education, private, religious, or home schools, and the 

8 right to make reasonable choices within public schools for 

9 one’s child. 

10 ‘‘SECTION 3. Neither the United States nor any State 

11 shall infringe these rights without demonstrating that its 

12 governmental interest as applied to the person is of the 

13 highest order and not otherwise served. 

14 ‘‘SECTION 4. The parental rights guaranteed by this 

15 article shall not be denied or abridged on account of dis16 ability. 

17 ‘‘SECTION 5. This article shall not be construed to 

18 apply to a parental action or decision that would end life.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
35.1



SERVICER
COMPLIANCE STATEMENT



Re:
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC in its capacity as Servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Sale and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2023, among Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 2023-1, as Issuer, Mercedes-Benz Retail Receivables
LLC, as Depositor, and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, as Seller and Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”),
for the period from January 25, 2023, to December 31, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”).



I,
Christian Rottenkolber, certify that:



| | (a) | A
                                         review of the Servicer’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance
                                         under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | To
                                         the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
                                         obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
                                         Period.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated:
March 20, 2024



| | /s/
    Christian Rottenkolber                       
| | -----------------------------------------------------
| | Name:
    Christian Rottenkolber                     
| | Title:
    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Laurence Stephenson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Douglas Lake Minerals Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date:  October 14, 2005 | /s/ Laurence StephensonLaurence Stephenson
President (Principal Executive Officer)
|----------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
##### 



I, Kirk E. Sanford, certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Dated: August 14, 2006
    By:
    /s/ Kirk E. SanfordKirk E. SanfordChief Executive Officer