Name: John M. McManus

Title: Vice President- Environmental Service Company: American Electric Power Sign Date: 6/30/2010 Name: Scott W. Banach Title: Director, Project Engineering Company: Platt Environmental Services, Inc. Sign Date: 6/25/2010 Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date 

### Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing Final Test Report for

/ / Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information in this test report are true, accurate, and complete. I have reviewed all testing details and results in this test report and hereby certify that the test report is authentic and accurate.

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 1 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010 Facility Information:

General James M. Gavin Unit 2- 8102

7397 N. St. Rte. 7

Cheshire OH 45620
Contact: Paul Jackson

Phone: 614-716-3278

Fax: 614-716-1252

Email: pmjackson@aep.com Testing Company:
Platt Environmental Services, Inc. 1520 Kensington Road

Suite 204

Oak Brook IL 60523
Contact: Scott Banach

Phone: 630-521-9400

Fax: 630-521-9494

Email: sbanach@plattenv.com

Air Permit Number:
06-27-01-0056 Permitted Source ID/Name:
General James M. Gavin Unit 2 0627010056

Permitted Maximum Process Rate:
11936 mmBTU/hr Max. Normal Operation Process Rate:
11936 mmBTU/hr Target Process Test Rate
11936 mmBTU/hr

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or process flow diagram:
Babcock and Wilcox model UP-102 pulverized coal-fired, dry-bottom boiler having a nominal capacity of 11,936 mmBTU/hr, and controlled with a SCR, ESP, and wet FGD.

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation of request AND approval, including dates. Industry/SCC/NAIS

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information: AFS #: FRS #:

SCC / Description 10100202 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal - Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom (Bituminous Coal)

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location Round

Duct Diam. Distance from upstream dist. Distance from

downstream dist. Number of

Traverse Ports Equiv. Diam Min.Travers Points Rect. Duct Length /Width
Stack 504 252 1008 4 0 6 0 0

Target Parameter Test Method Number of

Test Runs Test Run

Duration Sample

Points Comments Location Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26A 3 90 0 Stack Hydrogen Chloride Method 26A 3 90 0 Stack Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 90 0 Stack O2 Method 3A O2 3 90 0 Stack

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 2 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 3 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010 Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary

Location Stack - Method 26A Average
Run Number M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3

Test Date 3/11/2010 3/11/2010 3/11/2010

Run Start Time 8:27:00 AM 10:27:00 AM 12:16:00 PM

Run Finish Time 9:56:00 AM 11:46:00 AM 1:35:00 PM

Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 53.992 52.928 50.268 52.396
Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 15.15 15.77 15.04 15.320 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 12.97 13.49 13.43 13.297
Carbon Dioxide, % 12.1 11.9 12 12.000 Oxygen, % 7 6.9 7 6.967 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 122.75 124.17 124.00 123.640 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 4,000,266.7 3,861,003.8 3,887,833.3 3,916,367.93 3
Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 5,303,472.0 5,162,156.9 5,192,913.7 5,219,514.20 0 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 103.5 105.1 99.1 102.567
F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9931 9780 9780 9,830.333

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Location Stack - Method 3A CO2 Average
Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time
Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm
F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2
Moisture, % Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 4 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A O2 Average
Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time
Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm
F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2
Moisture, % Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 5 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010 Emissions Summary

Process Run Data Location: Stack - Method 26A Compound: Hydrogen Chloride Average RunNumber M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3 Mass_mg 18 18 18 18.000 lb/mmBtuO2 1.10E-02 1.09E-02 1.16E-02 0.011

Compound: Hydrogen Fluoride Average RunNumber M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3 Mass_mg 120 120 120 120.000 lb/mmBtuO2 7.32E-02 7.30E-02 7.74E-02 0.075

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 6 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010
Process Run Data

Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value
1 Bituminous Coal Burned 1134 1000 Tons/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1150

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 7 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

1 Main Steam Pressure 1102 psig The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1100

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 8 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

1 Main Steam Temperature 1008 F The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 9 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

1 Sorbent Injection Rate 0.95 tons/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 10 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

1 NH3 Flow 742.01 gal/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 740

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 11 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

1 Total Excess Air 19.44 % The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 20

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 12 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

1 Gross Load 1414.6 MW The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1300

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 13 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

2 Bituminous Coal Burned 1128 1000 Tons/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1150

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 14 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

2 Main Steam Pressure 1100 psig The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1100

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 15 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

2 Main Steam Temperature 1009 F The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 16 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

2 Sorbent Injection Rate 1.23 tons/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 17 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

2 NH3 Flow 742 gal/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 740

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 18 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

2 Total Excess Air 19.4 % The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 20

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 19 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

2 Gross Load 1409 MW The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1300

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 20 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

3 Bituminous Coal Burned 1131 1000 Tons/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1150

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 21 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

3 Main Steam Pressure 1100 psig The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1100

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 22 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

3 Main Steam Temperature 1009 F The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 23 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

3 Sorbent Injection Rate 1.31 tons/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 24 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

3 NH3 Flow 742 gal/hr The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 740

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 25 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

3 Total Excess Air 19.42 % The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 20

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 26 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data 3 Gross Load 1411 MW The ERT requires that the process data collected during the stack test period be accompanied by a target value. For the AEP tests, we want to clarify that the target value provided does not represent any limit or maximum design set point for operation of the steam generators and associated control equipment. In some cases, the value is a permit or regulatory limit, such as the case of opacity. Operation outside of the target value does not represent abnormal operation. 1300

Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value
1 CATALYTIC REDUCTION 45.1 Nox ppm 50

2 CATALYTIC REDUCTION 44.9 Nox ppm 50

3 CATALYTIC REDUCTION 45.1 Nox ppm 50

1 WET SCRUBBER - HIGH EFFICIENCY 79.61 So2 ppm 85

2 WET SCRUBBER - HIGH EFFICIENCY 78.07 So2 ppm 85

3 WET SCRUBBER - HIGH EFFICIENCY 87.2 So2 ppm 85

1 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH EFFICIENCY 6.91 opacity % 20

2 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH EFFICIENCY 8.3 opacity % 20

3 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR - HIGH EFFICIENCY 8.23 opacity % 20

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 27 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 28 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010
Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail

Location Stack - Method 26A Average Run Number M26A-1 M26A-2 M26A-3
Test Date 3/11/2010 3/11/2010 3/11/2010 Run Start Time 8:27:00 AM 10:27:00 AM 12:16:00 PM Run Finish Time 9:56:00 AM 11:46:00 AM 1:35:00 PM Net Traversing Points 16 16 16 Net Run Time, minutes 60 60 60 Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.235 0.235 0.235 0.235 Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1 1 1 1.000 Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.66 28.66 28.66 28.660 Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 2.25 2.14 2.18 2.190 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 54.968 54.685 52.565 54.073 Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 57.88 65.42 71.83 65.043 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 53.992 52.928 50.268 52.396 Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 204.8 210.6 189 201.467 Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 9.64 9.91 8.90 9.483 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 15.15 15.77 15.04 15.320 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 12.97 13.49 13.43 13.297 Dry Mole Fraction 0.8703 0.8651 0.8657 0.867 Carbon Dioxide, % 12.1 11.9 12 12.000 Oxygen, % 7 6.9 7 6.967 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.9 81.2 81 81.033 Fuel Factor 1.15 1.18 1.16 Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.22 30.18 30.20 30.200 Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.03 28.95 28.85 28.943 Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.500 Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.62 28.62 28.62 28.620 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 122.75 124.17 124.00 123.640 Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 1.1254567809 426 1.060519149

70358 1.069826945

15065 1.085

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 63.80 62.10 62.47 62.790 Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 1,385.442 1,385.442 1,385.442 1,385.442 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 4,000,266.7 3,861,003.8 3,887,833.3 3,916,367.9 33 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 5,303,472.0 5,162,156.9 5,192,913.7 5,219,514.2 00 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 103.5 105.1 99.1 102.567 Percent Excess Air, % 48.8 47.5 48.7 48.333 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9931 9780 9780 9,830.333 Round Duct Diameter, inches 504 504 504 Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0 Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0
Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000
Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 29 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A CO2 Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type
Fw
Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 30 of 30Gavin Unit 2 ICR Testing

6/30/2010

Location Stack - Method 3A O2 Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type
Fw
Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units

Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Page 31 of 30