alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Dissolution of North Star Electrical Contracting—N.Y.C. Corp. William T. McSpedon, Respondent-Appellant; North Star Contracting Corp. et al., Appellants-Respondents.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.), entered September 17, 1990, which, *inter alia,*after a non-jury trial, adjudged the fair market value of North Star Electrical Contracting— N.Y.C. Corp., as of March 20, 1987, to be $8,022,080, awarded petitioner a 25% share of that fair market value, with interest, totalling $2,415,946.56, and awarded petitioner back salary, with interest, costs and disbursements, totalling $91,950.79, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner and respondent Joseph Lovece as Chief Operating Officer of respondent North Star Contracting Corp., jointly formed North Star Electrical Contracting—N.Y.C. Corp. ("the subject corporation”) in 1984. After a dispute between them resulted in the initiation of a proceeding for judicial dissolution of the subject corporation, the parties stipulated to proceed as if the petitioner’s employment had been terminated, which entitled the petitioner to sell his 25% interest in the subject corporation for fair market value. By the terms of the stipulation, the fair market value was to be determined by the court, along with related issues including petitioner’s claim for back salary.

Generally, the conclusions of a fact-finding court should not be disturbed on appeal unless it is obvious that they could not be reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence, especially when the findings of fact rest in large measure on considerations relating to the credibility of witnesses *(Claridge Gardens v Menotti,*160 AD2d 544). The determination of a *374fact-finder as to the value of a business, if it is within the range of the testimony presented, will not be disturbed on appeal where valuation of the business rested primarily on the credibility of expert witnesses and their valuation techniques *(see, Poplar Disposal Serv. v Roth,*103 AD2d 1039). The determinations of the IAS court are supported by the record, and the contrary interpretations of fact and credibility offered by the parties on appeal do not justify disturbing those determinations.

The IAS court correctly valued the subject corporation as an ongoing business, rather than as a business in the process of liquidation *(Matter of Seagroatt Floral Co. [Riccardi],*167 AD2d 586). Further, it was proper to limit inquiry to the time prior to the valuation date on which the parties agreed *(see, Matter of Public Relations Aids,*109 AD2d 502).

We have considered the remaining arguments of the parties, and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin, Wallach and Smith, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sheer Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or

15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and results of operations

of the Company.





Date:  January 27, 2005





/s/ Doug Berry

---------------------------------------

Doug Berry, Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit No. 31.1


RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION


I, R. David Banyard, Jr., certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2022 of MasterBrand, Inc. (the “registrant”);





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:





a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.











/s/ R. David Banyard, Jr.R. David Banyard, Jr.President & Chief Executive Officer





Dated: March 10, 2023
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Tony D. Whitaker, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4 The registrants other certifying
officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change
in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying
officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.

|Date: November 14, 2007 | /s/Tony D. Whitaker  ****                               | 
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                        | Tony D. Whitaker                                       
|                        | Chairman of the Board and Chief
      Executive Officer

---
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 88 

Providing for the appointment of Franklin D. Raines as a citizen regent 

of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2020 

Ms. MATSUI (for herself, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, and Mr. SHIMKUS) submitted 

the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

House Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the appointment of Franklin D. Raines as 

a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on 

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in 

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 

7 reason of the expiration of the term of John W. McCarter 

8 Jr. of Illinois on March 21, 2020, is filled by the appoint9 ment of Franklin D. Raines of Washington, DC. The apVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:24 May 05, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ88.IH HJ88

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 88 IH 

1 pointment is for a term of six years, beginning the date 

2 of the enactment of this joint resolution. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9556]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


GPS Satellite Simulator Working Group Notice of Meeting

AGENCY:  The United States Air Force.

ACTION:  Meeting Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  This meeting notice is to inform the public that the Global 
Positioning Systems (GPS) Directorate will be hosting an open GPS 
Satellite Simulator Working Group (SSWG) meeting for manufacturers of 
GPS constellation simulators utilized by the federal government on 17 
May 2012 from 0730-1600 (Pacific Standard Time). The purpose of this 
meeting is to disseminate information about GPS simulators, discuss 
current and on-going efforts related to simulators and form a 
functioning GPS Satellite Simulator Working Group with industry and 
government participation.
    The GPS Satellite Simulator Working Group is open to any current 
manufacturer of GPS constellation satellite simulators who supply 
products to the Department of Defense. Please note that participants 
must possess a SECRET clearance to attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  We request that you register for this 
event no later than 8 May 2012. Please send the registration to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#147e6167607d7a3a70717d72717854787b67757a73717871673a75723a797d78"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="85eff0f6f1ecebabe1e0ece3e0e9c5e9eaf6e4ebe2e0e9e0f6abe4e3abe8ece9">[email protected]</span></a> and <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7700160e191259020502151e18371b1804161910121b1204591611591a1e1b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a0d7c1d9cec58ed5d2d5c2c9cfe0cccfd3c1cec7c5ccc5d38ec1c68ecdc9cc">[email protected]</span></a> and 
provide your name, organization, telephone number, address and security 
clearance information.

Wayne T. Urubio,
2nd Lieutenant, USAF, SMC/GPE, MUE Test Manager.
Henry Williams, Jr.,
DAF, Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-9556 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1375. JOHN A. FRILANDO v. RIMINA Z. LEWIS et al.

John A. Frilando, a prison inmate, filed a civil action againstRimina Lewis and

Kevin Robinson. On June 30, 2014, the trial court entered a judgment and decree

denying Frilando’s requested relief. On August 18, 2014, he filed a motion for new

hearing. The trial court denied the motion, and on December 4, 2014, Frilando filed

a notice of direct appeal to this Court. We lack jurisdiction for two reasons.

First, the notice of appeal is untimely. To be timely, a notice of appeal must

be filed within 30 days of the entry of an appealable judgment. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). 

Although the filing of a motion for new trial generally extends the deadline for filing

a notice of appeal, an untimely motion for new trial is void and does not extend the

time for filing an appeal. See Wicks v. State, 277 Ga. 121 (587 SE2d 21) (2003). To

be timely, a motion for new trial must “be made within 30 days of the entry of the

judgment.” OCGA § 5-5-40 (a). Because Frilando filed his motion 49 days after

entry of the final order, it did not extend the deadline for Frilando to appeal.

Second, because Frilando isincarcerated, his appeal is controlled by the Prison

Litigation Reform Act of 1996, OCGA § 42-12-1 et seq. Under OCGA § 42-12-8, an

appeal of a civil action filed by a prisoner “shall be as provided in Code Section 5-6-

35.” And under OCGA § 5-6-35, the party wishing to appeal must file an application

for discretionary appeal to the appropriate appellate court. Because a prisoner has no

right of direct appeal in civil cases, we lack jurisdiction to consider this direct appeal

from the trial court’s order. See Jones v. Townsend, 267 Ga. 489 (480 SE2d 24)

(1997). This appeal is therefore DISMISSED.

March 26, 2015
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/26/2015
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J.A. FISCHER, K.J. BRUBAKER, T.P. BELSKY

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

GEOFFREY M. ROLLINS

HULL TECHNICIAN FIREMAN (E-3), U.S. NAVY

NMCCA 201400430

GENERAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 8 August 2014.

Military Judge: CDR Michael J. Luken, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commander, Navy Region Mid-Atlantic, 

Norfolk, VA.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: CDR S.J. Gawronski, 

JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: Maj Emmett Collazo, USMCR.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller, Esq.

9 April 2015

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

For the Court

 

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ZAGG Incorporated, (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brandon T. O’Brien,
Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
BRANDON T. O’BRIEN


Brandon
T. O’Brien


Chief
Financial Officer


May 14,
2009
Exhibit 32.2

POLYPORE, INC.  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Polypore, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Lynn Amos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|May 10, 2007 |  | /s/LYNN AMOS                     
|------------ |  | ---------------------------------
|             |  | Lynn Amos
Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, April 12, 2012 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Aguilar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, April 12, 2012 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: April 5, 2012.

Kevin M. O'Neill, 

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-8714 Filed 4-6-12; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
National Organic Standards Board 

Crops Committee 

2012 Sunset Proposed Recommendation 

Lignin sulfonate 

February 15, 2011 

List: §205.601 Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic crop production. 

(j) As plant or soil amendments. 

(4)Lignin sulfonate—chelating agent, dust suppressant, flotation agent. 

(l) As floating agents in postharvest handling. 

(1) Lignin sulfonate. 

Committee Summary 

There were concerns during the last round of sunset for this material about its fate in waste 

water when it is used as a flotation agent. The Crops Committee addressed this concern with 

an annotation to relist lignin sulfonate on 205.601 (l) with the amended annotation: As floating 

agents in postharvest handling, subject to wastewater disposal documentation in the Organic 

Systems Plan to prevent adverse impact to aquatic life. It was also noted that there is a 

duplicate listing as a flotation agent in (j) As plant or soil amendments, so the Crops 

Committee is recommending relisting lignin sulfonate as plant or soil amendments with the 

annotation change: chelating agent, dust suppressant. 

Committee Recommendation 

1. Relist lignin sulfonate on § 205.601 (l) with the amended annotation: As floating agents in 

postharvest handling, subject to wastewater disposal documentation in the Organic Systems 

Plan to prevent adverse impact to aquatic life. 

2. Relist lignin sulfonate on § 205.601(j)(4) with the amended annotation: chelating agent, dust 

suppressant. 

Committee Vote 

1. Motion: Tina Ellor Second: John Foster 

Yes: 5 No: 0 Absent: 2 Abstain: 0 Recuse: 0 

2. Motion: Tina Ellor Second: Nick Maravell 

Yes: 5 No: 0 Absent: 2 Abstain: 0 Recuse: 0