alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

|         | /s/ TONY D. WHITAKER                                                     |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|         |                                                                          |
|         | Tony D.   Whitaker   Chairman of the Board and   Chief Executive Officer |
|         |                                                                     |
|         |                                                                     |
|         | /s/ R. CLAY HULETTE                                                      |
|         |                                                                          |
|         | R. Clay   Hulette   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer           |
|         |                                                                     |
|         |                                                                     |
| May 16, 2005 |                                                                     |
EX-4(a)(2)





 Exhibit 4a.2 

[



] 
 Home Office: Cincinnati, Ohio 

[Administrative Office: P.O. Box 5423, Cincinnati, Ohio 45201-5423] 

ADVISORY FEE ENDORSEMENT 
 If by Written
Request you direct us to pay advisory fees to a registered investment advisor for investment management services related to the Contract and those fees do not exceed a rate of 1.5% per year, then: 

 

	 	1)	 if taken from an Indexed Strategy, no Market Value Adjustment shall apply; and 



 

	 	2)	 the payment may be less than the $500 minimum withdrawal. 



This Endorsement is part of your Contract. It is not a separate contract. It changes the Contract only as and to the extent stated. In all cases of conflict
with the other terms of the Contract, the provisions of this Endorsement shall control. 
 Signed for us at our office as of the date of issue. 

 

			
	[        /s/ Mark F. Muething         ]	  	[        /s/ John P. Gruber         ]
	[Mark F. Muething]	  	[John P. Gruber]
	[President]	  	[Secretary]


  

	
	E1844022NW
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Series 25-2004 (B) L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Matthew A.
      JonesName:
            Matthew
      A. JonesTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            November
      16, 2009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION Ill 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

The Honorable E. Christopher Abruzzo, Secretary 

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 

Rachel Carson State Office Building 

400 Market Street 

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101 

Dear Secretary Abruzzo: 

On July 15,2014, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the 

Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental 

Protection (DEP) pertaining to the requirements of Clean Air Act Section 128 (State Boards) for all 

National Ambient Air Quality Standard pollutants. EPA has determined that this submittal is 

administratively and technically complete. 

EPA will be reviewing the revision and will prepare a Direct Final Rulemaking Notice (DFRN) 

action. If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Ruth Knapp, Office of 

Air Program Planning, at (215) 814-2191. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking. 

cc: Ms. Joyce E. Epps, Director 

Bureau of Air Quality, PADEP 

Sincerely, 

Diana Esher, Director 

Air Protection Division 

0 Printed on I 00% recycled/recyclable paper with I 00% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free. 

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 430 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 430

    Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to the Pledge of 
                              Allegiance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 26, 2002

Mr. Riley (for himself, Mr. Pombo, Mr. Cox, Mr. Hilleary, Mr. Sessions, 
Mr. Jones of North Carolina, Mr. Graham, Mr. Bachus, Mr. Schaffer, Mr. 
    Chambliss, Mr. Rogers of Michigan, Mr. Otter, Mr. Hayworth, Mr. 
Doolittle, Mr. Souder, Mr. Hayes, Mr. Green of Wisconsin, Mr. Akin, Mr. 
Combest, Mr. Herger, Mr. Ryun of Kansas, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, 
 Mr. Brown of South Carolina, Mr. Cramer, Mrs. Cubin, Mr. Cantor, Mrs. 
Myrick, Mr. Stearns, Mr. Foley, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Istook, Mr. Everett, and 
  Mr. Thune) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to the Pledge of 
                              Allegiance.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that Congress opposes the ruling of a 
Federal appeals court that the Pledge of Allegiance is an 
unconstitutional endorsement of religion and cannot be recited in 
schools, because the Pledge is a deeply embedded symbol of our Nation 
and the freedoms we hold so dear.
                                 <all>
```
**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Thomas Kirchner, certify that: 

  1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of FalconTarget, Inc.;  

  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  

  3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  

  4) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  

  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; and  

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and  

  5) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  

  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and  

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.  

Date: October 29, 2004 

By:   /s/   Thomas Kirchner 

    Thomas Kirchner

    Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**SENECA GAMING CORPORATIONCERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE OFFICERS**

 

(Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Seneca Gaming Corporation, or SGC, on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission, we, Brian Hansberry, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer, and Erik T. Palmer, principal financial officer, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                      TheQuarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,; and

 

2.                                      Theinformation contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operation of SGC as of, andfor, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to SGC and will be retained by SGC and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its Staff upon request.

 

May 15, 2008

 
| /s/ E. Brian Hansberry                |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| E. Brian Hansberry                    |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |   |
|                                  |   |
|                                  |   |
| /s/ Erik T. Palmer                    |   |
| Erik T. Palmer                        |   |
| Executive Director of Finance         |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer)         |   |

 

Theforgoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Qpursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated byreference into any filing of SGC, whether made before or after the date hereof,regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit 10.76

                 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT


                  This Amendment No. 2 (the "Amendment") dated as of November
30, 1998 to Loan and Security Agreement by and between THE CIT GROUP/EQUIPMENT
FINANCING, INC. ("Lender"), Lexington Precision Corporation ("LPC").

                 WHEREAS, Lender and LPC are parties to a Loan and Security
Agreement dated as of March 19, 1997, including Rider A thereto (the
"Agreement").

                 WHEREAS, LPC and Lender desire to amend the Agreement as
provided herein.

                 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual
promises contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by the parties hereto,
the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

                 1. Capitalized terms used herein, unless otherwise defined
herein, shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the Agreement.

                 2. Section 4(d) of Rider A to the Agreement is hereby amended
in its entirety to read as follows:

                 (d) not incur, make or commit to make any expenditure in
                 respect of the purchase or other acquisition of fixed or
                 capital assets including leases which in accordance with
                 generally accepted accounting principles should be capitalized
                 on the books of Debtor (including normal replacements and
                 maintenance) which after giving effect thereto, would cause the
                 aggregate amount of such capital expenditures by Debtor to
                 exceed $18,000,000 in Debtor's fiscal year 1997, $16,000,000 in
                 Debtor's fiscal year 1998 and $15,000,000 (on a non-cumulative
                 basis) in any fiscal year thereafter.

                 3. Except as specifically amended herein, the Agreement remains
in effect in accordance with its terms.

                 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Amendment to be duly executed and delivered by their respective duly authorized
officers as of the day and year first written above.

                              THE CIT GROUP/EQUIPMENT FINANCING, INC.

                              By:    Barry L. Blailock
                                 ----------------------------------
                              Title: Assistant Vice President/Credit
                                   --------------------------------

                              LEXINGTON PRECISION CORPORATION

                              By:    Warren Delano
                                 ----------------------------------
                              Title: President
                                   --------------------------------
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 97 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit 

the composition of the Senate to Senators from States admitted to 

the Union prior to the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2020 

Mr. WALKER submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to limit the composition of the Senate to Senators 

from States admitted to the Union prior to the One 

Hundred Sixteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 97 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘The Senate of the United States shall be composed 

5 of Senators who are from States admitted to the Union 

6 prior to the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.58

             Amendment to Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement
             ------------------------------------------------------

         This Amendment is made as of March 7, 2002, to the Nonqualified Stock
Option Award Agreement dated May 22, 2001 (the "Award Agreement") by and between
Interliant, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (the "Company") and The Feld Group,
Inc. (the "Optionee"). Where the terms of this Amendment conflict with the terms
of the Award Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall control.

         For good and valuable consideration, including but not limited to the
mutual promises set forth herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree to the following changes to the Award Agreement:

         The first sentence of Section 3 (a), beginning with the words "Subject
to Section 3(c) hereof" and ending with the words "through and including May 22,
2005." is hereby be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

         "Subject to Section 3(c) hereof, one forty-eighth (1/48) of the Option
         Shares shall become vested and exercisable based on the passage of
         time, on each monthly anniversary date of the Date of Grant beginning
         June 22, 2001 and continuing through and including, February 22, 2002.
         Thereafter, the balance of the 2,000,000 Option Shares not yet vested
         (i.e., 1,625,000 Option Shares) shall become vested and exercisable in
         ten (10) equal monthly installments based on the passage of time, on
         the last day of each month commencing March 31, 2002 and continuing
         through and including December 31, 2002."

         Except as modified herein, the Award Agreement as originally drafted,
shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by
their authorized representatives.

INTERLIANT, INC.                            THE FELD GROUP, INC.


By:       /s/ Francis J. Alfano             By:        /s/ Mike Koehler
    --------------------------------           ---------------------------------
        Francis J. Alfano                            Mike Koehler
        Chief Financial Officer                      Chief Operating Officer
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 18

- 10124 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 0:17

- cv - 62141

- BB ; 0:04

- cr - 60046

- JAG

- 1

RAYMOND GEORGE BOHNING, Petitioner

- Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

- Appellee.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

________________________ (A pril 2, 2019) Before MARCUS , ROSENBA UM and JILL PRYOR , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 18-10124 Date Filed: 04/02/2019 Page: 1 of 32 Raymond Bohning, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se , appeals the district court’s dismissal of his second 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate based on lack of jurisdiction. On appeal, he reiterates his argument from the § 2255 motion

— that Amendment 801 to the Sentencing Guidelines added a knowledge requirement to sentencing enhancements for distribution of child pornography , and the amendment should be applied retroactively to reduce his s entence because he did not possess the requisite knowledge. 1
We conduct a de novo review of a district court’s dismissal of a § 2255 motion as second or successive. McIver v. United States , 307 F.3d 1327, 1329 (11th Cir. 2002). We review a district court’s denial of a motion for reconsideration for an abuse of discretion. Farris v. United States , 333 F.3d 1211, 1216 (11th Cir. 2003). A federal prisoner who wishes to file a second or su ccessive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence is required to move the court of appeals for an order authorizing the district court to consider such a motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). Without such authorization, the district court lacks jurisd iction to

1 Bohning also argues, for the first time on appeal, that his § 2255 motion should instead be construed as an 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion. Even if we assume that this argument is properly before us, Bohning is not entitled to relief under § 3582(c)(2)

. Section 3582(c )(2) allows relief only in accordance with the policy statements of the Sentencing Commission. And the Commission ’ s policy statement, which is codified at U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, allows for sentence reductions based only on amendments to the guidelines that are specifically listed in § 1B1.10(d). Because Amendment 801 is not listed there, Bohning is not entitled to relief.

Case: 18-10124 Date Filed: 04/02/2019 Page: 2 of 33 consider a second or successive § 2255 motion to vacate. United States v. Holt , 417 F.3d 1172, 1175 (11th Cir. 2005). Here, the record shows that Bohning had filed a previous § 2255 motion that was denied on the merits and failed to first seek or receive our permission to file the instant, second § 2255 motion . Thus, the district court properly dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction. For the same reasons, we also cannot say that the district court abused its discretion in denying Bohning’s motion for reconsideration. Accordingly, we affirm. AFFIRMED. Case: 18-10124 Date Filed: 04/02/2019 Page: 3 of 3
### SERVED: JUNE 27, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION· OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATfER OF GLOBAL AIRCRAFT INTERIORS, INC. DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-0324 (Civil Penalty Action)


### NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING**·.E~IJiTtviENT** 

## OF**·~~'JSPORTATlOI·J**

### ·~.~r<.ET 

## OPERATIONS Zill4 JUN 30 A G: 

### 3q

Thisproceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011EA110043) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service List

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. 

### MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY
Federal Aviation Administration · 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20.591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur WrightBuilding-Suite 2W1

## ooo 1 ONE COPY Sande Lichtenstein, Respondent's Counsel Lichtenstein & Schindel 158 West Boston Post Road P.O. Box 787 Mamaroneck, NY 10543 Zachary M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Office ofthe Regional Counsel 1 Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258 FAX: 718-995-5699 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20

. U.S. Department ofTransportation

1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0324 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited coUrier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
Record ofDiscussion 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Boeing AR Bhupinder Singh 11 / 19/2014 

ATA Bob Ireland 2/13/2015 

Other/ Additional Information: