alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00472-CR

Sean Allen Harrison, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 299TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-06-300938, HONORABLE CHARLES F. BAIRD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed with this Court on August 17, 2007. The

reporter’s record was filed on April 29, 2008, making appellant’s brief due May 29, 2008. In July,

after we sent notice that the brief was overdue, appellant’s attorney requested and received a sixtyday extension of time, making the brief due July 28, 2008. A supplemental reporter’s record was

filed on July 15, and a supplemental clerk’s record was filed on August 8. On July 28, appellant’s

new appellate counsel requested an extension of time, explaining that he was recently appointed

to this cause. We granted that motion, cautioning that no further extensions would be granted and

giving counsel until September 26 to file the brief. On September 29, counsel filed another motion

for extension of time. On October 7, we granted that motion, ordering counsel to file the brief no

later than October 27. To date, appellant’s brief has not been filed.
2

We therefore abate the cause and remand it to the trial court to hold a hearing in

accordance with rule 38.8 of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). The

trial court shall hold a hearing immediately to determine whether appellant still wishes to prosecute

his appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and whether counsel has abandoned the appeal. See id.

If appellant desires to appeal and is indigent, the trial court should make appropriate orders to ensure

that appellant is adequately represented on appeal. See id. Following the hearing, the trial court

should order the appropriate supplementary clerk’s and reporter’s records to be prepared and

forwarded to this Court. See id.

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson

Abated

Filed: January 16, 2009

Do Not Publish
Broadway Coffeehouse LLC

and Marcus Rogers, as Trustee

for the Saks Children Trust a/



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 11, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00734

- CV

Sandra SAKS , Lee Nick McFadin, III, and Margaret Landen Saks,

Appellant s

v.

BROADWAY COFFEEHOUSE LLC an d Marcus Rogers, as Trustee for the Saks Children

Trust a/k/a ATFL&L, a Texas trust,

Appellee s

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 17001

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

R e beca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

The court has considered the Appellants' Motion for Rehearing En Banc, and the motion

is DENIED.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 11th day of December, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aurelio Resource Corporation. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Fred Warnaars, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                               
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|Dated: May 19, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Fred Warnaars             
|                    |  |  |  | Fred Warnaars                 
|                    |  |  |  | acting Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement is required by Section 906 has been provided to Aurelio Resource
Corporation and will be retained by Aurelio Resource Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Ex 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

        I,Charles L. Thibault, certify that:

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lazy Days’ R.V. Center,Inc. (the “Company”) for the three months ended September 30, 2004;

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of and forthe periods presented in this report;

4.             TheCompany’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:

                (a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

                (b)          Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

                (c)          Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

5.             TheCompany’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

                (a)           all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

                (b)           any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November  15, 2004 |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |   |
| /s/ Charles L.  Thibault |   |
| By: Charles L.  Thibault |   |
| Chief Financial  Officer |   |

 

 

----
Environmental Fate: 

It is readily biodegradable. 

The Log Kow value << 3 indicate that the substance will not bioaccumulate. 

Ecotoxicological Information:

Algae ErC50 = > 93 mg/L, 

Daphnia EC50 = 6.1 mg/L, 

Fish LC50 = >8.7 mg/L
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-14-00386-CR 

VINCENT OLIVA, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 140th District Court 

Lubbock County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2012-435,021, Honorable Jim Bob Darnell, Presiding 

 

April 8, 2015 

 

ABATEMENT AND REMAND 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Appellant Vincent Oliva appeals his conviction for robbery. The clerk’s record 

was filed on February 2, 2015. By letter dated February 10, 2015, this court notified the 

court reporter that the reporter’s record was overdue and that he should advise the 

court of the status of the record by February 20, 2015. The court reporter then moved 

for an extension of time to file the record. The motion was granted, and the deadline 

was moved to March 4, 2015. Thereafter, the reporter once again moved for an 

extension, which motion was granted. The new deadline was set as April 3, 2015. 
2

Furthermore, the court reporter was told that failure to comply with the deadline may 

result in the appeal being abated. The court reporter has now filed a third extension to 

file the reporter’s record. 

Accordingly, we deny the request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s 

record and abate the appeal and remand the cause to the 140th District Court of 

Lubbock County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall 

immediately determine, through hearing or otherwise when the reporter’s record can 

reasonably be transcribed into written form and filed in a manner that does not further 

delay the prosecution of this appeal or have the practical effect of depriving the 

appellant of his right to appeal. 

The trial court shall 1) execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing 

the foregoing issue and 2) cause to be developed a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing its findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders it may issue as a 

result of its resolution of the foregoing inquiry. Additionally, the district court shall then 

file a supplemental clerk’s record with the clerk of this court on or before April 23, 2015. 

Should further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must 

be requested before April 23, 2015. 

It is so ordered. 

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
### Adams, Kevin 

### (OST)

From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Subject: Adams, Kevin (OST) Sunday, December 08, 2013 8:42 PM Adams, Kevin (OST) 

### FW: United Airlines application forservice to Sioux City, lA

From: durwardl@aol.com [mailto:durwardl@aol.com] 

### Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2013 6:03 

### PM To: Adams, Kevin (OST); EAS (OST) 

### Subject: United Airlines application for service to Sioux City, lA

DearSir, Iam writing in support ofthe application of United Airlines to resume service to Sioux City. United Airlines would have significant advantages forthe population of"Siouxland" compared to the current airline, American, for several reasons: 1. United Airlines has the ability to provide service from Sioux City not only to the East (Chicago), but ifservicewereto expand, also to the West (Denver). American can only expand additional service to its hub in the South (Dallas). 2. United provided long-standing service to Sioux City until 15 yrs ago. There remains a large contingent offlyers from Sioux Citywho continue to wantto fly United Airlines and consequently do so from the Omaha and Sioux Falls airports, cities an hourand a halfdrive to the North and South of us. Service outofSioux City will bring these passengers back immediately. American has no such base of long-standing loyal flyers. 3. United's numberofhubs (7) provides a significantly greater route network compared to American's, allowing increased access to cities domestically and worldwide. Given there will likely be only one provideratSioux City airportforthe foreseeable future, this is a huge advantage in my opinion. Thank-you foryour consideration. Quentin Durward

1
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Danny Mendelson, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wise Metals Group LLC; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:August 15, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1020 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1020

  To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to require Members of 
Congress to disclose business ties with foreign entities, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2019

  Mr. Posey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to require Members of 
Congress to disclose business ties with foreign entities, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISCLOSURE BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS OF BUSINESS TIES WITH 
              FOREIGN ENTITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 102 of the Ethics in Government Act of 
1978 (5 U.S.C. App. 102) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(j) Any report filed pursuant to section 101(d) by a Member of 
Congress shall include the disclosure of any business ties the Member 
or any member of the Member's immediate family has (if any) with a 
foreign entity. If a Member of Congress makes an affirmative disclosure 
of any such ties, the Member shall include information detailing the 
nature of the business tie and foreign entity.''.
    (b) Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to any report filed pursuant to section 101(d) of the Ethics in 
Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App. 101(d)) after the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

6/10/2015 COA No. 13-13-00471-CR

ZALMAN, DANIEL Tr. Ct. No. 57,007 PD-0261-15

On this day, the Appellant's petition for discretionary review has been refused. 

Abel Acosta, Clerk

RICHARD L. MANSKE

121 E MONSERATTE ST

EL CAMPO, TX 77437-4423

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

FILE COPY
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

6/10/2015 COA No. 13-13-00471-CR

ZALMAN, DANIEL Tr. Ct. No. 57,007 PD-0261-15

On this day, the Appellant's petition for discretionary review has been refused. 

Abel Acosta, Clerk

13TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

DORIAN RAMIREZ

901 LEOPARD

CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78401

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

FILE COPY
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

6/10/2015 COA No. 13-13-00471-CR

ZALMAN, DANIEL Tr. Ct. No. 57,007 PD-0261-15

On this day, the Appellant's petition for discretionary review has been refused. 

Abel Acosta, Clerk

DISTRICT ATTORNEY WHARTON COUNTY

ROSS M. KURTZ

100 S. FULTON, SUITE 100

WHARTON, TX 77488

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

FILE COPY
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

6/10/2015 COA No. 13-13-00471-CR

ZALMAN, DANIEL Tr. Ct. No. 57,007 PD-0261-15

On this day, the Appellant's petition for discretionary review has been refused. 

Abel Acosta, Clerk

LISA MCMINN

STATE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY

P.O. BOX 13046

AUSTIN, TX 78711

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

FILE COPY
IB 

Union Calendar No. 29 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1010 

[Report No. 116–43, Parts I and II] 

To provide that the rule entitled ‘‘Short-Term, Limited Duration Insurance’’ 

shall have no force or effect. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2019 

Ms. CASTOR of Florida (for herself, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Mr. HORSFORD, Ms. 

MOORE, Ms. UNDERWOOD, and Mr. DESAULNIER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Labor, and 

Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

APRIL 29, 2019 

Reported from the Committee on Education and Labor 

MAY 10, 2019 

Additional sponsors: Mr. WELCH, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. 

RUIZ, Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. RUSH, Mr. PALLONE, Ms. MATSUI, Ms. 

ESHOO, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Ms. SHALALA, Mr. VAN DREW, Ms. 

WILD, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. CARBAJAL, Mr. CASE, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. 

MOULTON, Mr. KILMER, Ms. MUCARSEL-POWELL, and Mr. LANGEVIN

MAY 10, 2019 

Reported from the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

MAY 10, 2019 

Committee on Ways and Means discharged; committed to the Committee of 

the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1010 RH

A BILL 

To provide that the rule entitled ‘‘Short-Term, Limited 

Duration Insurance’’ shall have no force or effect. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1010 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT-TERM LIMITED DURATION INSURANCE 

4 RULE PROHIBITION. 

5 The Secretary of Health and Human Services, the 

6 Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Labor 

7 may not take any action to implement, enforce, or other8 wise give effect to the rule entitled ‘‘Short-Term, Limited 

9 Duration Insurance’’ (83 Fed. Reg. 38212 (August 3, 

10 2018)), and the Secretaries may not promulgate any sub11 stantially similar rule. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 29 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1010 

[Report No. 116–43, Parts I and II] 

A BILL 

To provide that the rule entitled ‘‘Short-Term, 

or effect. Limited Duration Insurance’’ shall have no force 

MAY 10, 2019 

Reported from the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

MAY 10, 2019 

Committee on Ways and Means discharged; committed to 

Union and ordered to be printed the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7190

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

GREGORY W. BURWELL, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior 

District Judge (3:03-cr-00203-REP-1; 3:03-cv-00274-REP) 

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 23, 2008 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Gregory W. Burwell, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Gregory W. Burwell seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Burwell has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED