alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 188TH DISTRICT COURT OF GREGG COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 4th 

day of February, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Waynetta Maria Jackson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-14-00119-CR

Trial Court No. 43406-A

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Waynetta Maria Jackson, has adequately indicated her

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 9th day of April, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1047 

To give effect to more accurate maps of units of the John H. Chafee 

Coastal Barrier Resources System that were produced by digital mapping 

of such units, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2019 

Mr. DUNN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To give effect to more accurate maps of units of the John 

H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System that were 

produced by digital mapping of such units, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF CERTAIN JOHN H. CHAFEE 

4 COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM 

5 MAPS. 

6 (a) CAPE SAN BLAS P30/P30P (1 OF 2).—The map 

7 entitled ‘‘Cape San Blas Unit P30/P30P (1 of 2)’’ and 

8 dated January 11, 2016, as included in the set of maps 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1047 IH

1 entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’ referred to 

2 in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 

3 U.S.C. 3503(a)), is hereby replaced by another map relat4 ing to that unit entitled ‘‘Cape San Blas Unit P30/P30P 

5 (1 of 2)’’ and dated December 19, 2018. 

6 (b) CAPE SAN BLAS P30/P30P (2 OF 2).—The map 

7 entitled ‘‘Cape San Blas Unit P30/P30P (2 of 2)’’ and 

8 dated January 11, 2016, as included in the set of maps 

9 entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’ referred to 

10 in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 

11 U.S.C. 3503(a)), is hereby replaced by another map relat12 ing to that unit entitled ‘‘Cape San Blas Unit P30/P30P 

13 (2 of 2)’’ and dated December 19, 2018. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.26

                           [LETTERHEAD APPEARS HERE]

                                STATE OF NEW YORK
                               DEPARTMENT OF STATE
                              ALBANY, NY 12231-0001



ALEXANDER F. TREADWELL
  SECRETARY OF STATE

                                                      FILING ACKNOWLEDGMENT
                                                         
                                                         September 10, 1996

RETURN TO CUSTOMER SERVICE COUNTER

                                           Customer Reference Number: 31764

C T CORPORATION SYSTEM
155 WASHINGTON AVENUE
ALBANY, NY 12210

Attached is the acknowledgment copy of your recently submitted filing. This
document has been filed with the New York State Department of State, Uniform
Commercial Code Division.

This UCC-3 Termination has been assigned Filing Number: 178808, Filing Date:
09/09/1996.

The Original Financing Statement No.009126 filed 01/16/1996 and any associated
UCC-3 filings referencing this financing statement have been removed from our
active files by this action.

If you have any concerns regarding the way this document was referenced and/or
processed, please contact one of our Customer Service Representatives at (518)
432-2733, or respond in writing to the UCC Data Processing Unit at the address
indicated above.

Sincerely,

Uniform Commercial Code Division
Data Processing Unit                                             REF #: 571522
<PAGE>
 
                             SECRETARY OF THE STATE
                                30 TRINITY STREET
                                 P.O. BOX 150470
                             HARTFORD, CT 06115-0470

NOVEMBER 12,1996


       CT CORPORATION SYSTEM
       ONE COMMERCIAL PLAZA
       280 TRUMBULL STREET
       HARTFORD, CT 06103-3597

RE:    Acceptance of UCC Filing

This Letter is to confirm the acceptance of the following filing:

Work Order Number: 1996121770-003
UCC Filing Number: 0001722201
Reference Number: 0001650738
Type of Request: TERMINATION
Date Accepted: SEP 04 1996
Time Accepted: 01:30 PM
Work Order Payment Received: 100.00
Payment Received: 25.00
Account Balance: 19554.30
Customer Id: 007625

A UCC filing report has been provided for verification.

Commercial Recording Division
LILLIAN FLETCHER
<PAGE>
 
                                UCC FILING REPORT



                               

      WORK ORDER NUMBER:1996121770-003
      UCC FILING NUMBER:0001722201

DEBTOR NAMES AND ADDRESSES:

            NAME PREFIX:
          BUSINESS NAME:EL CAMINO RESOURCES, LTD.
            NAME SUFFIX:
                ADDRESS:21051 WARNER CENTER LANE
         CITY/STATE/ZIP:WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367

SECURED PARTY NAMES AND ADDRESSES:

            NAME PREFIX:
          BUSINESS NAME:THE CIT GROUP/EQUIPMENT FINANCING, INC.
            NAME SUFFIX:
                ADDRESS:900 ASHWOOD PARKWAY, 6TH FLR.
         CITY/STATE/ZIP:ATLANTA, GA 30338

                               ** END OF REPORT **
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IASIS Healthcare LLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ W. Carl WhitmerW. Carl WhitmerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruben ROJAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 76-2451

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 10, 1976.

Bennie E. Ray, Brownsville, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

Edward B. McDonough, Jr., U. S. Atty., Mary L. Sinderson, George A. Kelt, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., Robert A. Berg, Asst. U. S. Atty., Corpus Christi, Tex., James R. Gough, Asst. U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before AINSWORTH, CLARK and RO-NEY, Circuit Judges.

*

 Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see *Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al.,*5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

PER CURIAM:

The search of appellant’s vehicle took place at the Sarita checkpoint which was the subject of *Sifuentes v. United States,*affirmed *sub nom., United States v. Martinez-Fuerta,*—— U.S.-, 96 S.Ct. 3074, 49 L.Ed.2d - (1976). The officer had probable cause to search the car after he detected the car interior smelled of alcohol and marijuana. The judgment of the district court finding appellant guilty of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute is affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent 

 v. 

RONALD BANKS, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 17 WM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form
10-K Amendment No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2021 of JJY Holding Group, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yanping Sheng, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in this Annual Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|Date: August 9, 2022 | By: | /s/ Yanping Sheng      
|-------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|                     |     | Yanping Sheng          
|                     |     | Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March
31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:/s/ James A. Calder

James A. CalderChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
  38
NUMBER 13-15-00108-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

V. BELAFONTE FRIAR, Appellant,

v.

CHRISTOPHER BLASCHKE, INDEPENDENT 

EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF MARY ANNA 

MAJEFSKI WINDELMANN, DECEASED, Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court 

of DeWitt County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, V. Belafonte Friar, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment 

entered by the County Court of DeWitt County, Texas, in cause number 11347A. 
2

The trial court entered a final judgment in this cause on December 2, 2014. A 

motion for new trial was filed on January 12, 2015, and notice of appeal was filed on

March 4, 2015. 

On March 6, 2015, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that 

the notice of appeal was late. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected 

within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court’s letter, the appeal would be 

dismissed. Appellant has not filed a response to the Court’s notice. 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1 provides that an appeal is perfected when 

notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed, unless a motion for 

new trial is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(1). Where a timely motion for new trial 

has been filed, notice of appeal shall be filed within ninety days after the judgment is 

signed. Id. Appellant’s deadline for filing the motion for new trial was January 2, 2015.

1

 

The motion for new trial was untimely because it was filed on January 12, 2015.

2

 

Accordingly, appellant’s notice of appeal was due to have been filed on or before January 

2, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, 

appellant’s failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant’s failure to respond to this 

Court’s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of 

 

1 The thirtieth day after December 2, 2014, fell on January 1, 2015 which was New Year’s Day. 

As per TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), the deadline for filing the notice of appeal was extended to Friday, January 

2, 2015.

2 Even if appellant’s motion for new trial had been timely filed, the appeal would be untimely as the 

notice of appeal was filed more than ninety days after the date the judgment was signed. 
3

jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF 

JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a)(c).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

9th day of April, 2015.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00080-CV

JOSEPH OBLAS, DEREK 

HUMPHREYS, AND COUNTRY 

RIDGE NORTH II, LLC

APPELLANTS

V.

B BARRON INVESTMENTS, LLC APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 16TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 14-08116-16

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered Appellants’ “Unopposed Motion And Order To 

Dismiss With Prejudice.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be 

granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 

43.2(f).

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellants, for which let execution 

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: April 9, 2015
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 3, 2021

No. 04-21-00159-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.D.V., A CHILD

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020PA00206

Honorable Linda A. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating appellant’s parental rights 

which must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal 

is filed. TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. The clerk’s record was due April 29, 2021, but was not 

filed. On May 3, 2021, the district clerk filed a notification of late record, requesting an 

extension of ten days to file the record. 

After consideration, we GRANT the district clerk’s request for an extension of 

time and ORDER the district clerk to file the clerk’s record in this court by May 10, 

2021. The district clerk is reminded that strict deadlines exist with regard to disposal of 

appeals dealing with termination of parental rights. Further extensions of time will be 

disfavored. 

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of May, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

GIACOMO DAVID PISCIOTTA,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 309 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 140th District Court of Lubbock County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on April 8, 2015,

the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Vincent Oliva v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 07-14-00386-CR Trial Court Number: 2012-435,021

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated April 8, 2015, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to the 140th District

Court of Lubbock County, Texas for further proceedings in accordance with this Court’s

opinion entered this day.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on April 8, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ Matthew A. JonesName:
    
    Matthew A. JonesTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
    
    May 17, 2010
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Action Industries, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, I, Joseph Meuse, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  May 5, 2009 Action Industries, Inc. By:  /s/ Joseph Meuse Joseph Meuse  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Action Industries, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, I, Inna Sheveleva, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  May 5, 2009 Action Industries, Inc. By:  /s/ Inna Sheveleva Inna Sheveleva
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6899

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MUTTAQIN FATIR ABDULLAH, a/k/a King, a/k/a Clayton Montray 

Pinckney,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District 

Judge. (3:05-cr-00014-MBS-1; 3:08-cv-70115-MBS)

Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: November 30, 2010

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Muttaqin Fatir Abdullah, Appellant Pro Se. James Chris Leventis, 

Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Muttaqin Fatir Abdullah seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Abdullah has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny Abdullah’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 21

                           BLACK HILLS CORPORATION

                           SUBSIDIARY OF REGISTRANT

                      Wyodak Resources Development Corp.
                            a Delaware corporation

              SUBSIDIARIES OF WYODAK RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT CORP.

                                DAKSOFT, Inc.
                          a South Dakota corporation

                         Landrica Development Company
                          a South Dakota corporation

                 Black Hills Exploration and Production, Inc.
                            a Wyoming corporation

                         Black Hills Generation, Inc.
                            a Wyoming corporation

                       Black Hills Capital Group, Inc.
                          a South Dakota corporation

               SUBSIDIARIES OF BLACK HILLS CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

                          Black Hills FiberCom, Inc.
                          a South Dakota corporation

                        Black Hills Coal Network, Inc.
                          a South Dakota corporation

                             Enserco Energy, Inc.
                          a South Dakota corporation

                      Black Hills Energy Resources, Inc.
                          a South Dakota corporation

               SUBSIDIARY OF BLACK HILLS ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.

                                VariFuel, Inc.
                          a South Dakota corporation