2776 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 12 / Thursday, January 19, 2012 / Notices 

2 Goodyear’s petition, which was filed under 49 

CFR part 556, requests an agency decision to 

exempt Goodyear as a replacement equipment 

manufacturer from the notification and recall 

responsibilities of 49 CFR part 573 for 26,224 of the 

affected tires. However, a decision on this petition 

cannot relieve Goodyear distributors of the 

prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale, or 

introduction or delivery for introduction into 

interstate commerce of the noncompliant tires 

under their control after Goodyear recognized that 

the subject noncompliance existed. 

1 Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc., a division of Dorel 

Industries, Inc., is an Indiana company that 

manufactures and imports motor vehicle 

equipment. 

2 DJG’s petition, which was filed under 49 CFR 

part 556, requests an agency decision to exempt DJG 

as an equipment manufacturer from the notification 

and recall responsibilities of 49 CFR part 573 for 

89,527 of the affected child restraint systems. 

However, a decision on this petition cannot relieve 

child restraint system distributors and dealers of the 

prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale, introduction 

or delivery for introduction into interstate 

commerce of the noncompliant child restraint 

systems under their control after DJG notified them 

that the subject noncompliance existed. 

NHTSA notes that the statutory 

provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 

30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to 

file petitions for a determination of 

inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to 

exempt manufacturers only from the 

duties found in sections 30118 and 

30120, respectively, to notify owners, 

purchasers, and dealers of a defect or 

noncompliance and to remedy the 

defect or noncompliance. Therefore, 

these provisions only apply to the 

26,224 2 tires that have already passed 

from the manufacturer to an owner, 

purchaser, or dealer. 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: 

Delegations of authority at CFR 1.50 and 

501.8. 

Issued on: January 12, 2012. 

Claude H. Harris, 

Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2012–933 Filed 1–18–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–59–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration 

[Docket No. NHTSA–2012–0002; Notice 1] 

Dorel Juvenile Group, Receipt of 

Petition for Decision of 

Inconsequential Noncompliance 

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration, DOT. 

ACTION: Receipt of Petition. 

SUMMARY: Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.1

(DJG) has determined that certain child 

restraint systems manufactured between 

July 20, 2010 and May 18, 2011 do not 

fully comply with paragraph S5.5 

Labeling of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety 

Standard (FMVSS) No. 213,Child 

Restraint Systems. DJG has filed an 

appropriate report pursuant to 49 CFR 

part 573, Defect and Noncompliance 

Responsibility and Reports (dated June 

23, 2011). 

Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 

30120(h) (see implementing rule at 49 

CFR part 556), DJG has petitioned for an 

exemption from the notification and 

remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. 

Chapter 301 on the basis that this 

noncompliance is inconsequential to 

motor vehicle safety. 

This notice of receipt of DJG’s petition 

is published under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 

30120 and does not represent any 

agency decision or other exercise of 

judgment concerning the merits of the 

petition. 

Affected are approximately 89,527 of 

the following models of DJG child 

restraint systems that were 

manufactured between July 20, 2010 

and May 18, 2011: 

22187ANL Alpha Omega Elite 

22187REM Alpha Omega Elite 

22187REMA Alpha Omega Elite 

22187SAR Alpha Omega Elite 

22187SARA Alpha Omega Elite 

22465 FSM Alpha Omega Elite 

22790CGT Deluxe 3 in 1 

CC033BMT Alpha Omega Elite 

CC043ANK Alpha Omega Elite 

CC043ANL Alpha Omega Elite 

CC043AQS Alpha Omega Elite 

CC046AAI Deluxe 3 in 1 

CC046AAU Deluxe 3 in 1 

CC046CTA Deluxe 3 in 1 

CC046SNW Deluxe 3 in 1 

CC046WPR Deluxe 3 in 1 

CC050AJH Complete Air LX 

CC050ANY Complete Air LX 

CC050ANZ Complete Air LX 

CC050AOQ Complete Air LX 

CC051AIR Complete Air SE 

NHTSA notes that the statutory 

provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 

30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to 

file petitions for a determination of 

inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to 

exempt manufacturers only from the 

duties found in sections 30118 and 

30120, respectively, to notify owners, 

purchasers, and dealers of a defect or 

noncompliance and to remedy the 

defect or noncompliance. Therefore, 

these provisions only apply to the 

89,527 2 child restraint systems that DJG 

no longer controlled at the time it 

determined that the noncompliance 

existed. 

DJG described the noncompliance as 

follows: 

The child restraints at issue utilize a 

permanently attached base which are 

equipped with color coordinated Ease of Use 

labels including base labels depicting the 

rear-facing mode instructions. The issue is 

that certain restraints were equipped with 

base labels positioned on the incorrect side 

of the base. Even if the base labels are 

positioned on the incorrect side of the base, 

nearly all the information is correct, except 

the small indicator arrows do not line up 

with the rear-facing vehicle and LATCH belt 

path for the rear-facing mode. As noted in the 

Noncompliance Information Report, this 

voluntarily supplied information caused the 

installation diagram required by FMVSS 213 

S5.5.2(l) to be inaccurate. 

The noncompliance exists when the base 

labels are installed incorrectly and the 

indicator arrows do not point to the 

rear-facing vehicle belt/LATCH routing path. 

The arrows are actually pointing to the area 

below the forward-facing vehicle belt/LATCH 

path routing but could be construed as 

pointing to the forward-facing routing path. 

DJG stated its belief that the 

likelihood a consumer would interpret 

the arrows as indicating the proper 

rear-facing path routing through the 

forward-facing path routing is extremely 

low. The proper rear-facing vehicle belt/ 

LATCH routing path is shown very 

clearly in the five diagrams on the two 

base labels. 

DJG argued that instructions included 

with the subject child restraint systems 

also correctly depict the rear-facing 

vehicle belt/LATCH routing path 

numerous times. 

DJG noted that only one user 

complaint related to this issue had been 

received. 

DJG also included the results of a 

survey conducted to illustrate any 

effects the noncompliance may have on 

seat installation. 

In conclusion, DJG stated its belief 

that the technical noncompliance issue 

reported in the June 23, 2011 

Noncompliance Information Report 

does not constitute a true safety related 

issue because there is no evidence that 

improper installation is actually taking 

place in the field (as evidenced by the 

lack of significant complaints from 

consumers, advocates, health care 

specialists or anyone else). DJG also 

stated that the preponderance of correct 

rear-facing installation diagrams and 

instructions appears to outweigh the 

potential for improper installation as a 

result of the ambiguous arrows on the 

rear-facing installation labels on the 

base. DJG also indicated that there 

appears to be a very low probability that 

improper installation is even possible in 

the vast majority of vehicles surveyed, 

which represent a good cross section of 

vehicles in the field. 

Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views, and 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 12 / Thursday, January 19, 2012 / Notices 2777 

arguments on this petition. Comments 

must refer to the docket and notice 

number cited at the beginning of this 

notice and be submitted by any of the 

following methods: 

a. By mail addressed to: U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590. 

b. By hand delivery to: U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590. The Docket Section is open 

on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

except Federal Holidays. 

c. Electronically: by logging onto the 

Federal Docket Management System 

(FDMS) Web site at http:// 

www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Comments may also be faxed to 1-(202) 

493–2251. 

Comments must be written in the 

English language, and be no greater than 

15 pages in length, although there is no 

limit to the length of necessary 

attachments to the comments. If 

comments are submitted in hard copy 

form, please ensure that two copies are 

provided. If you wish to receive 

confirmation that your comments were 

received, please enclose a stamped, selfaddressed postcard with the comments. 

Note that all comments received will be 

posted without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided. 

Documents submitted to a docket may 

be viewed by anyone at the address and 

times given above. The documents may 

also be viewed on the Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov by following 

the online instructions for accessing the 

dockets. DOT’s complete Privacy Act 

Statement is available for review in the 

Federal Register published on April 11, 

2000, (65 FR 19477–78). 

The petition, supporting materials, 

and all comments received before the 

close of business on the closing date 

indicated below will be filed and will be 

considered. All comments and 

supporting materials received after the 

closing date will also be filed and will 

be considered to the extent possible. 

When the petition is granted or denied, 

notice of the decision will be published 

in the Federal Register pursuant to the 

authority indicated below. 

DATES: Comment closing date: February 

21, 2012. 

Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: 

delegations of authority at CFR 1.50 and 

501.8). 

Issued on: January 12, 2012. 

Claude H. Harris, 

Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2012–936 Filed 1–18–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–59–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Office of Foreign Assets Control 

Unblocking of One Specially 

Designated National or Blocked 

Person Pursuant to Executive Order 

13315, as Amended 

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets 

Control, Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Treasury Department’s 

Office of Foreign Assets Control 

(‘‘OFAC’’) is publishing the name of an 

individual whose property and interests 

in property have been unblocked 

pursuant to Executive Order 13315 of 

August 28, 2003, ‘‘Blocking Property of 

the Former Iraqi Regime, Its Senior 

Officials and Their Family Members, 

and Taking Certain Other Actions,’’ as 

amended by Executive Order 13350 of 

July 30, 2004. 

DATES: The removal of this individual 

from the SDN List is effective as of 

January 10, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Assistant Director, Compliance 

Outreach & Implementation, Office of 

Foreign Assets Control, Department of 

the Treasury, Washington, DC 20220, 

tel.: (202) 622–2490. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic and Facsimile Availability 

The SDN List and additional 

information concerning OFAC are 

available from OFAC’s web site 

(www.treasury.gov/ofac). Certain general 

information pertaining to OFAC’s 

sanctions programs also is available via 

facsimile through a 24-hour fax-ondemand service, tel.: (202) 622–0077. 

Background 

On August 28, 2003, the President 

issued Executive Order 13315 (the 

‘‘Order’’) pursuant to the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 

U.S.C. 1701 et seq., the National 

Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq., 

section 5 of the United Nations 

Participation Act, as amended, 22 U.S.C. 

287c, section 301 of title 3, United 

States Code, and in view of United 

Nations Security Council Resolution 

1483 of May 22, 2003. In the Order, the 

President expanded the scope of the 

national emergency declared in 

Executive Order 13303 of May 22, 2003, 

to address the unusual and 

extraordinary threat to the national 

security and foreign policy of the United 

States posed by obstacles to the orderly 

reconstruction of Iraq, the restoration 

and maintenance of peace and security 

in that country, and the development of 

political, administrative, and economic 

institutions in Iraq. The Order blocks 

the property and interests in property 

of, inter alia, persons listed on the 

Annex to the Order. 

On July 30, 2004, the President issued 

Executive Order 13350, which, inter 

alia, replaced the Annex to Executive 

Order 13315 with a new Annex that 

included the names of individuals and 

entities, including individuals and 

entities that had previously been 

designated under Executive Order 

12722 and related authorities. 

The Department of the Treasury’s 

Office of Foreign Assets Control has 

determined that the individual 

identified below, whose property and 

interests in property were blocked 

pursuant to Executive Order 13315, as 

amended, should be removed from the 

SDN List. 

The following designation is removed 

from the SDN List: 

AL–HABOBI, Dr. Safa Haji J (a.k.a. AL– 

HABOBI, Dr. Safa; a.k.a. AL–HABUBI, 

Dr. Safa Hadi Jawad; a.k.a. HABUBI, 

Dr. Safa Hadi Jawad; a.k.a. HABUBI, 

Dr. Safa Jawad; a.k.a. JAWAD, Dr. Safa 

Hadi), Flat 4D Thorney Court, Palace 

Gate, Kensington, United Kingdom; 

Iraq; DOB 01 Jul 1946; Former 

Minister of Oil (individual) [IRAQ2] 

The removal of this individual’s name 

from the SDN List is effective as of 

January 10, 2012. All property and 

interests in property of the individual 

that are in or hereafter come within the 

United States or the possession or 

control of United States persons are now 

unblocked. 

Dated: January 9, 2012. 

Adam J. Szubin, 

Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control. 

[FR Doc. 2012–960 Filed 1–18–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Office of Foreign Assets Control 

Unblocking of One Specially 

Designated National or Blocked 

Person Pursuant to Executive Order 

13315, as Amended 

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets 

Control, Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES