alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 4 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to limit 

the number of terms an individual may serve as a Member of Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. ARRINGTON (for himself, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. FITZPATRICK, and Mr. 

GIANFORTE) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to limit the number of terms an individual may 

serve as a Member of Congress. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 4 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. No person shall serve as a Representa3 tive for more than six two-year terms. Service as a Rep4 resentative for more than one year of any two-year term 

5 shall be treated as a complete term for purposes of this 

6 section, without regard to whether the service was com7 pleted by the individual originally elected to the term. 

8 ‘‘SECTION 2. No person shall serve as a Senator for 

9 more than two six-year terms. Service as a Senator for 

10 more than three years of any six-year term shall be treated 

11 as a complete term for purposes of this section, without 

12 regard to whether the service was completed by the indi13 vidual originally elected to the term. 

14 ‘‘SECTION 3. This article shall not apply to any per15 son who served as a Representative or as a Senator during 

16 any Congress occurring before the One Hundred Fifteenth 

17 Congress.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 76 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 76

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
        Education relating to ``Borrower Defense Institutional 
                           Accountability''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the

              

 Department of Education relating to ``Borrower Defense Institutional 
Accountability'' (84 Fed. Reg. 49788 (September 23, 2019)), and such 
rule shall have no force or effect.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 16, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             H. J. RES. 76

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
        Education relating to ``Borrower Defense Institutional 
                           Accountability''.
```
#### Edward Mortimer ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, and Alan N. Charnes, duly appointed Executive Director of the Department of Revenue, State of Colorado, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 79CA0844.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

March 27, 1980.

Rehearing Denied April 24, 1980.

Certiorari Granted Aug. 5, 1980.

H. E. Carleno, Englewood, for plaintiff-appellant.

J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Hennessey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Mary J. Mullarkey, Sol. Gen., James R. Willis, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for defendants-appellees.

KELLY, Judge.

Edward Anderson appeals the judgment of the district court affirming the revocation of his driver’s license by the Depart-*52*merit*of Revenue. He argues that he should have been permitted to attack the validity of one of the convictions which formed the basis for the revocation at the Department’s hearing. We agree and therefore reverse.

Anderson’s license was revoked because he had been convicted three or more times of operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor or while his ability was impaired. *See*§§ 42-2-202(2Xa)(I), and 42-2-203, C.R.S.1973. Anderson challenged the validity of one of the convictions which formed the basis of the hearing officer’s finding because Anderson assertedly had no notice of the proceeding which resulted in his bond forfeiture and conviction. While the hearing officer properly found that the bond forfeiture constituted a conviction pursuant to § 42-2-123(6)(b), C.R.S.1973 (1978 Cum.Supp.), he refused to consider Anderson's testimony tending to show absence of notice for the purpose of collateral attack on the judgment. Anderson argues that a jurisdictional challenge to a conviction may be raised at any time including a license revocation hearing. We agree.

While the driving history record is prima facie proof of its contents, including convictions, the licensee may present evidence to attack the accuracy of any item in the record, raising a question of fact to be resolved by the hearing officer. *Gillespie v. Director of the Department of*Revenue, 41 Colo.App. 561, 592 P.2d 418 (1978). An allegation that the defendant failed to receive notice of the proceedings which resulted in the conviction constitutes a direct attack upon the jurisdiction of the trial court which entered the judgment. *San Juan & St. Louis Mining & Smelting Co.*v. *Finch,*6 Colo. 214 (1882). If Anderson’s testimony were to be believed, the judgment would be void and subject to attack directly or collaterally at any time. *See Grand Junction v. Kannah Creek Water Users Ass’n,*192 Colo. 284, 557 P.2d 1173 (1976); *see also People v. Heinz,*Colo., 589 P.2d 931 (1979).

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded to the district court with directions to remand the cause to the hearing officer for further proceedings and such factual determinations as may be appropriate.

COYTE and SMITH, JJ., concur.
Record ofDiscussion Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD



### With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i .e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED Boeing AR Bhupinder Singh 11 / 19 /2014 ATA Bob I reland 2/13 /2015

Other /Additional Information:
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-50704

Conference Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

David Arturo Jasso-Lujan, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

No. 7:20-CR-100-1

Before Smith, Stewart, and Higginson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent David Jasso-Lujan has moved to 

withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), 

and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jasso-Lujan has filed 

a response. 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances 

set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 26, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-50704 Document: 00515835861 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/26/2021
No. 20-50704

2

We have reviewed counsel’s brief, relevant portions of the record, and 

Jasso-Lujan’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for review. Accordingly, the motion for 

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 20-50704 Document: 00515835861 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/26/2021
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 93 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding 

the right to vote. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 7, 2020 

Mr. POCAN (for himself, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. BLUNT

ROCHESTER, Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, Mr. DESAULNIER, Mr. 

GARAMENDI, Ms. GARCIA of Texas, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HASTINGS, Ms. 

JAYAPAL, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. KHANNA, Ms. 

KELLY of Illinois, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. MENG, Ms. MOORE, Mr. NORCROSS, Ms. NORTON, Ms. 

PRESSLEY, Mr. RASKIN, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. RUSH, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. SEWELL of Alabama, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. TLAIB, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. VEASEY, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, and Mr. YARMUTH) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States regarding the right to vote. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 93 IH 

1 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

2 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

3 States after the date of its submission for ratification: 

4 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

5 ‘‘SECTION 1. Every citizen of the United States, who 

6 is of legal voting age, shall have the fundamental right 

7 to vote in any public election held in the jurisdiction in 

8 which the citizen resides. 

9 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress shall have the power to en10 force and implement this article by appropriate legisla11 tion.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







The
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Cross Canyon Energy Corp. (the
“Company”), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:  November
      16, 2009
            
            /s/  Robert
      P. MunnRobert
      P. MunnPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# C_2004094EN.01002302.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/23

---

Action brought on 17 February 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Republic of Finland

(Case C-72/04)

(2004/C 94/50)

An action against the Republic of Finland was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 17 February 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by G. Zavvos and M. Huttunen, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | Declare that the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2000/64/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 November 2000 amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC, 92/49/EEC, 92/96/EEC and 93/22/EEC as regards exchange of information with third countries (1), since it has not brought into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the directive, or at least has not informed the Commission of them; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declare that the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2000/64/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 November 2000 amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC, 92/49/EEC, 92/96/EEC and 93/22/EEC as regards exchange of information with third countries (1), since it has not brought into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the directive, or at least has not informed the Commission of them;

1

| 2. | Order Finland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order Finland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposition of the directive expired on 17 November 2002.

---

(1)  OJ 2000 L 290, p. 27.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 22795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9232]



[[Page 22795]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Initial Review Group Biomedical Research Review 
Subcommittee.
    Date: June 12, 2012.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Philippe Marmillot, Ph.D. Scientific Review 
Officer National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Alcohol 
Abuse and Alcoholism, 5635 Fishers Lane, RM 2019, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-443-2861, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6904081b04000505061d19290408000547070001470e061f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="365b57445b5f5a5a594246765b575f5a18585f5e18515940">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards., National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 10, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-9232 Filed 4-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 107 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 4, the 

3 Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the fol4 lowing correction: In the short title, strike ‘‘Voting Rights 
2 

•HCON 107 EH 

1 Advancement Act of 2019’’ and insert the following: 

2 ‘‘John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of 2020’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 27, 2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 107 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House to make a 

correction in the enrollment of H.R. 4.
V. JOu/>/~\ %&( &>.(m-o)

W AAy^A^ 9f03 t83/0//)-ti)

e

8 _, W*!Lsg y SE5S-. -

eew* (SHIWAL APPBAW.

APR 'OR 23b

AbsSAcosta,Clerk

hlilM fvAASod

vf

AAr/ /A7^JAvA £>jL>AJ>,AA uUt/'jtfe,'d&e£ j/Z-tfL, 'MUibfc»Q &?uAfslzUtf'M>t'"$&> Ah/ MP//<>7/osJ

Cou/otoFAAi^Ja/ M^/(, W AkfaAJ f&s/ffihzfo

-/p^y/k^pJ uio /f/^/A luj/% aa-aS/% & -/t^y

owe**/ P&n , iUdedl cpASLs&HdZ^EidmdtL m&^rhAft) iAijioufhl^ /^ McAf/J ~/^Ao/oes

m i&py^Ly dh/Oicfci'6 Aow2t, wi/£ AA/iSa/AvJo, •1U> okJ-ea, W JU/AM aA^A^AWa^ A

AziMt Ml KdM 4U/0/ioffa*J /e

wL> hU it\ UiAi & aZ>/& /pf-ikes 0i

vce/ (6J?/ 73. ( xin/f/ 9,?> A{., (/>ec4u5es-////Mzfr&nctS

0)

Ifl.f/stTtrs

J-/V

d>iwfot /P

'A? mA^/a&J //, /)?
aUa le/Aaa /Aj c^yy^- /^s^wl ky#y &**&& &y

/W m/c/ AtjA Aes <feeJ& Ao Ah^/LY/; APf/A/s/cA'^y

fbU /Vat a/fSAAeyyy/iAJt U' A/fti

fttteCeJ y^e; y^uAy /n/rAL &/&

/fc> da>a /%>iey ofyi^ ///P/a^J AALnwy /^ue.

j^/ej .MeA/hdziki/> /^^ys? Ay>/$r? / 5- /A^yyy

jy Mi/JiY //>a 0/ts/$u7t+j A/gnk//s Axzyzyosj

M/oSeA, fae/b/s Qy J/k3^yA^ f^ejTAAs/ xuid Akw/kOJ? /yt An/ yyyeAfi/kAAA AA/^A^

... uAJeAs1 A1: AA /Mj/rs-£JjA,r<,<+ -z/„ .^r ^

hf /((pAry^jt'(9f Z/swOsJ. (kAAu&y JA/A» bik/t6erf~See.

.,_ .- .'j&^Sfikfanrf' /my^/yyy'if ^^/^A/^m//^ y y^ fountAoxfc />A/J- i/i/ri/r/ AA/^A •&&<; /A/^pt^^d^^t

umtafr M*A<-A>/&S u^ArJ}, y„lfS 7l,iy/) rt^/AAA

H-fc) ij %,yyi jvsA -£esis>& 6c^yfo<jAiyy&s- py/&^i ij ifj?;y,uy, L y a%AyiA).. /„u,.?*,a, yyy), •

oAfi/h)), f/j /A <Ai_ /t^J /huitf^,

(y d
S I 0- 1 [():,()4-()(i s 

## .-/.nTMENTO F

Febniai y 22 , 201 1 

# 0oT~OST-\'l^^-6S-<3i!g£_- u -- ^ 2U 3 Hononibl c Ra y LaHoo d Secretary o f

Transportatio n Unite dState s Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave . S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : Teimiiuitio nof EA S Pn^tu n i nMetccdit aAiqmc t

Poiice » Puert o Ric o Dea r Miste r LaHood : I a mwritin g thes e fe w word s t o le t yo u kno w my concer nabou t th e tenninatio no f

th e subsid y give nt o th e Mercedit aAirpor t i nth e City o f

Ponc e throug hth e Essentia l Ai r Servic e Progra m (EAS) . A s atrade r

i ndi e sout hare ao f

th e islan dthi s wil l affec t direcd y t o th e econom y o f th e entir e zone . Th e Airpor t

help s u s a s a na dho c airport , bu t als o help s th e touris ml ath e south , east , an d centra l are ao f

th e Island . Mcrccdit ai s th e fastes t way t o connec t

wit hPuert o Rico' s capital , San Juan . I t i s als o essentia l tha t

schedul e ai r

service , includin g bot hpassenge r aix l cargo , betwee n Ponc e an dSa n Jua ncontinue . Puert o Ric o ha s auniqu e geographi c characterisdc s an dcultura l tie s t o th e Caribbea nan dLati n America . Th e continuit y o f intemariona l ai r

service s fro mal l th e serviceabl e point s i nth e islan di s essentia l t o th e cultura l an deconomi c growt ho f th e region . Th e tertninado no f th e subsid y woul d impl y th e dismissa l o f

th e airpor t

employee s increasin g unemploymen t percentag e i nPuert o Rico . A s a nemploye r

an dcitize no f

th e sout hregio no f

Puert o Rico , I urg e tha t Mercedit aAirpor t continu e Inth e EA S platform . Sincerely , / / Carlo s R . Monde z Carlo s R . Mende z & Associate s P . O . Bo x 50 1 Mercedita , P . R . 00715-050 1 Busines s Addies s C787) 259-176 7 OfGc c Phon e Numbc i caflosmendezflssof:<fllyflhoo.co m
EXHIBIT 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bruce Ellsworth, certify that:

1. I have reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10 QSB of Boomers'  Cultural
Development, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant and I have:

a)   designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures to ensure that material
     information   relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its  consolidated
     subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us by  others  within  those  entities,
     particularly  during  the period in which  this  quarterly  report is being
     prepared;

b)   evaluated the  effectiveness  of the registrant's  disclosure  controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
           filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this report our  conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of the
     disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
     Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation,  to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's  board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the  design  or  operation  of  internal
     controls which could adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to record,
     process,  summarize and report  financial data and have  identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
     employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the  registrant's  internal
     controls; and

6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes
in  internal  controls  or in other  factors  that  could  significantly  affect
internal  controls  subsequent  to the  date  of  our  most  recent  evaluation,
including any  corrective  actions with regard to significant  deficiencies  and
material weaknesses.


Date:  October 11, 2005


By: /s/ Bruce Ellsworth
            --------------------
            Bruce Ellsworth
            President and CEO
Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District 

JUNE 29, 2016 

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b). 

1. Case No. SD34130 

 Re: DERON SHANTA LEWIS, 

 Movant-Appellant, 

 vs. 

 STATE OF MISSOURI, 

 Respondent-Respondent.