alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7581

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RODNEY HAROLD HENRY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-04-1610) Submitted: September 26, 2006 Decided: September 28, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney Harold Henry, Appellant Pro Se. Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Rodney Harold Henry seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and his motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Henry has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Henry’s motion for a certificate of appealability, deny his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 - 2498 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION **11 /**  **6 /13**  MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Test Procedure Meeting with th e Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers and the Global Automakers FROM: Christopher Laroo TO: EPA Docket # EPA - HQ - OAR - 2009 - 0472 This me mo documents a meeting held on 11 / 6 /13 between representatives of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, Global Automakers, ARB, an d EPA to discuss light - duty vehicle test procedures in 40 CFR parts 85, 86, 600, 1065 and 1066 . The meeting attendees are enclosed. Th e discussion topics included testing on partial hy brid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and parts 86, 1065 , and 1066.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 22, 2010 

s1115 

Order 

 

November 22, 2010 

141596 

CORONA CONSTRUCTION, INC., 

Plaintiff/Counter DefendantAppellee, 

v SC: 141596 

 COA: 295576 

Wayne CC: 08-109892-CK 

CHERYL GRAY, 

Defendant/Counter PlaintiffAppellant, 

and 

GREGORY GRAY and GRAY & GRAY 

PRODUCTIONS, INC., 

 Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 6, 2010 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
## f 

## /^ ^^^41

LION OIL COMPANY EI Dorado Refinery 1000 McHenry P.O. Box 7005 EI Dorado, Arkansas 71731-7005

(870)862-8111 

## ^rr^^~. I I 1013 SEP 24 Ph9 12 : 40 OFF ;;L E OF T EXEt1UTi'VE SE;^t^^ ►w^i:^T

September 17, 2013 The Hon. Gina McCarthy Administrator United States Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20460 Re: Petition for Waiver of 2014 Renewable Fuel Standard Dear Administrator McCarthy: Lion Oil Company. ("Lion" or the "Company") respectfully submits this petition to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") for a partial waiver of the 2014 applicable volumes of the Renewable Fuel Standard ("RFS") pursuant to section 211(o)(7)(A) of the Clean Air Act.l'' Lion is an obligated party pursuant to regulations promulgated by EPA to implement the RFS (40 C.F.R Part 80, Subpart M). The Company is thus a person subject to the requirements of subsection 211(o) of the Clean Air Act. Lion also is a mernber of the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers ("AFPM"). Existing EPA administrative and judicial precedent makes clear that AFPM has standing to file an RFS waiver petition on behalf of inember companies. Notwithstanding this understanding, Lion's submittal incorporates by reference the RFS waiver petition filed by AFPM and the American Petroleum Institute on August 13, 2013.
Respectfully submitted,



# ^^A44e e-Alw^ Lion Oil Company Michael E. Norman Vice President — Environmental & Regulatory Affairs 

### mike. norman@lionoil. com/615.435.1402

... See 42 U.S.C. § 7545(o)(7)(A).

# 3 = z = 

# ^ o = 6 ^ P ^ 

# ^ ^
^

l 

# J
: ^ . ^ ^ II r ^ ^ l< -1' 

# = —^ ^M - M ^ M ^m 

## J ° U 

## ^LL



# ^^. ^ N O ,► c^ .. 

## ^Z^ yF.r E d^ 

# ^e ^ ^ ^ ol N

'^ O
^ w N cr) 

### O o U) r N <L M U C) ^- J ^ Q N^ LL
M^ ^ O 

### N N O CO d ^ O ^ C O ^ ^ ^
^ ^ ^ ^

^
^ ^
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0003148

07-APR-2015

08:59 AM
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment
      Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certifies
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Jenniffer
      Collins


Jenniffer
      Collins


Interim
      Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)


November
      14, 2007
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 59 

Expressing support for the designation of February 12, 2017, as ‘‘Darwin 

Day’’ and recognizing the importance of science in the betterment of 

humanity. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2017 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself and Mr. MURPHY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of February 12, 

2017, as ‘‘Darwin Day’’ and recognizing the importance 

of science in the betterment of humanity. 

Whereas Charles Darwin developed the theory of evolution by 

the mechanism of natural selection, which, together with 

the monumental amount of scientific evidence Charles 

Darwin compiled to support the theory, provides humanity with a logical and intellectually compelling explanation 

for the diversity of life on Earth; 

Whereas the validity of the theory of evolution by natural selection developed by Charles Darwin is further strongly 

supported by the modern understanding of the science of 

genetics; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 59 IS 

Whereas it has been the human curiosity and ingenuity exemplified by Charles Darwin that has promoted new scientific discoveries that have helped humanity solve many 

problems and improve living conditions; 

Whereas the advancement of science must be protected from 

those unconcerned with the adverse impacts of global 

warming and climate change; 

Whereas the teaching of creationism in some public schools 

compromises the scientific and academic integrity of the 

education systems of the United States; 

Whereas Charles Darwin is a worthy symbol of scientific advancement on which to focus and around which to build 

a global celebration of science and humanity intended to 

promote a common bond among all the people of the 

Earth; and 

Whereas February 12, 2017, is the anniversary of the birth 

of Charles Darwin in 1809 and would be an appropriate 

date to designate as ‘‘Darwin Day’’: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Darwin Day’’; 

3 and 

4 (2) recognizes Charles Darwin as a worthy sym5 bol on which to celebrate the achievements of reason, 

6 science, and the advancement of human knowledge. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00319-CR

Michael Oliver Smith

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 78th District Court

of Wichita County (52,047-B)

April 9, 2015

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bill Meier 

 Justice Bill Meier
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Chaojun Wang, the Chief Executive Officer of
LONGHAI STEEL INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1.     The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2011 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
statement this 16th day of May, 2011.

/s/ Chaojun
WangChaojun Wang Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Longhai Steel Inc. and will be retained by Longhai
Steel Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 4TH DISTRICT COURT OF RUSK COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 17th 

day of December, A.D. 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

James Earl Piland, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-14-00063-CR

Trial Court No. CR 13-214

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, James Earl Piland, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 24th day of September, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1692

KEIRY SANTOS-SOTO, Petitioner,
versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U. S. Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A96-236-027) Submitted: January 24, 2007 Decided: February 12, 2007 Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul S. Haar, Pauline M. Schwartz, LAW OFFICES OF PAUL S. HAAR, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, Janice K. Redfern, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Keiry Santos-Soto, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s denial of her requests for asylum and withholding of removal. Because the Board affirmed under its streamlined process, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(e)(4) (2006), the immigration judge’s decision is the final agency determination. See Camara v. Ashcroft , 378 F.3d 361, 366 (4th Cir. 2004). We have reviewed the administr ative record and the immigration judge’s decision and find that substantial evidence supports the ruling that Santos-Soto failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution as necessary to establish eligibility for asylum. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(a) (2006) (stating that the burden of proof is on the alien to establish eligibility for asylum); INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992) (same). Moreover, as Santos-Soto cannot sustain her burden on the asylum claim, she cannot establish her entitlement to withholding of removal. SeeCamara , 378 F.3d at 367 (“Because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum--even though the facts that must be proved are the same--an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of re moval under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).”).- 3 - Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




In
      connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
      ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
      ‘‘Report’’) by MDwerks Inc. (the ‘‘Registrant’’), I, Vincent Colangelo, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.


Dated:
                August 13, 2007
            
            /s/
                Vincent ColangeloChief
                Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT****32****.1**



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 20lll02



In connection with the Annual Report of GlobalTech Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2022 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dana Green, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                    
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 30 day of March 2023.





|*/s/ Dana Green*                                                                         | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Dana Green Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
S-1000 PRE-FLIGHT CHECKLIST

Item Checks Notes

Flight Area Check with Google Maps

Communication Radios Operational (if needed)

Obstacles Clear

Wind Speed / Direction Check

Perimeter (!00m) Clear

Antennas (5) Check direction

Ground Control Station Load flight plan (if needed)

Field Monitor On

Camera Lens cap off / lens clean

SD Card Installed with available space

Camera Power On - battery level check

Verify Camera Mode

Install Camera Check

Center of Gravity Check

Level Copter Check nose direction - course lock

Flight Transmitter Switches Switches and throttle down

Flight Transmitter On

Model Selection S-1000

Flight Transmitter Voltage > 6.0v

Camera Transmitter Switches HDMI - standby / FPV - free

Camera Transmitter On

Camera Transmitter Voltage > 6.0v

S-1000 Power On - black lead first

GPS Calibration 1st Flight Toggle GPS switch 8-10 times

Horizontal Calibration LED - Solid Blue Rotate 360 degrees nose ahead

Vertical Calibration LED - Solid Green Rotate 360 degrees nose down

Cycle S-1000 Battery Check nose direction - course lock

Establish GPS Acquisition No Red Flashes > 7 Satellite acquisition

Attitude Mode Indication Flash Amber Throttle down - 2 / Centered - 1

GPS Mode Indication Flash Purple Throttle down - 2 / Centered - 1

Course Lock Indication Flash Green Throttle down - 2 / Centered - 1

Camera Transmitter HDMI Switch On

1
Camera Transmitter Free Style Switch Free

Camera Operation Verify Shutter check / video check

Verify Data Link Roll S-1000 check on-screen indicators

Ground Control Station Load flight plan (if needed)

Verify Altitude Approximately 0m

Confirm GPS Link No Red Flashes > 7 Satellite acquisition on field monitor

Emergency Landing Area Check

Flight Transmitter Timer Start

Item Checks Notes

2
AP9 R04-30-92 S:\FormsLib\Civil Bureau\Civil Courts & Post Judgment\Post Trial\Appeal Status Card Revised 01-18-2013

RDATE 4/92015

 NOTICE OF APPEALS

ASSIGNMENT OF COURT OF APPEALS

TO: 1ST COURT OF APPEALS 

From: Deputy Clerk: MICHELLE LOPEZ

 Chris Daniel, District Clerk

Harris County, T E X A S

CAUSE: 2013-59946 

VOLUME PAGE OR IMAGE # 64703423

DUE 4/17/2015 ATTORNEY 24025840

NOTICE OF APPEAL HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO THE 1ST

DATE JUDGMENT SIGNED: 3/18/2015 

MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL DATE FILED n/a

REQUEST TRANSCRIPT DATE FILED n/a

NOTICE OF APPEAL DATE FILED 4/7/2015

NUMBER OF DAYS: ( CLERKS RECORD ) 10

FILE ORDERED: YES NO IMAGED FILED: YES NO 

CODES FOR NOTICE OF APPEAL: D, OA

CHRIS DANIEL 

Harris County, District Clerk

By: /s/MICHELLE LOPEZ 

 MICHELLE LOPEZ, Deputy

BC NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED

BG NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED – GOVERNMENT

C JUDGMENT BEING APPEALED

D - ACCELERATED APPEAL

OA NO CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED

O CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED (W/NOTICE OF APPEAL)

NA AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/9/2015 9:33:37 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk





JUC8H (NR4#) JUSTICE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM APR 09, 2015(C1) 

INT6510 CIVIL CASE INTAKE OPT: _____ - INT

 GENERAL PARTY INQUIRY PAGE: 1 - 1

 

CASE NUM: 201359946__ PJN> __ TRANS NUM: _________ CURRENT COURT: 281 PUB? _

CASE TYPE: TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE CASE STATUS: READY DOCKET 

STYLE: PSC INDUSTRIAL OUTSOURCING LP VS REVENEW INTERNATIONAL LLC 

=============================================================================

 **** ACTIVE PARTIES **** 

 PJN PER/CONN COC BAR PERSON NAME PTY ASSOC. ATTY 

 NUM NUMBER STAT 

 _ 00003-0001 AGT REVENEW INTERNATIONAL LLC (LIM 

 _ 00002-0001 DEF 24025840 REVENEW INTERNATIONAL LLC HARRISON, LAU

 _ 00001-0001 PLT 24013156 PSC INDUSTRIAL OUTSOURCING LP MENSING, TODD

 

 

 

 

 

 

==> (3) CONNECTION(S) FOUND 

1=INACTIVE 2=ATY. INQ. 3=ACT.ENTRY 4=ISS. SERV. 5=DOC. INQ. 

6=CASE INQ. 7=BACKWARD 8=FORWARD 9=PTY. ADDR. 10=REFRESH 11=HELP
391 A.2d 688

#### Commonwealth v. King, Appellant.

Submitted March 21, 1977.

Douglas M. Johnson, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Robert A. Selig, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Order affirmed.

HOFFMAN and SPAETH, JJ., dissented on the basis of *Commonwealth v. Dilbeck,*466 Pa. 543, 353 A.2d 824, 827 (1976): “The failure to satisfy these minimal requirements [of the Comments to Pa.R.Crim.P. 319(a)] will result in reversal.”

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
# Fruit and Tree Nut

# Fruit IDIQ
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 23.1



                          CONSENT OF KPMG LLP

The Board of Directors
Sames Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
333-92993 and 333-30191 on Form S-8 of Sames Corporation of our report dated
March 30, 2001 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Sames
Corporation and consolidated subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity,
and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2000, one month ended December
31, 1999, and for each of the years ended November 30, 1999 and November 30,
1998, which  report appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form
10-K of Sames Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
April 12, 2001
# FY18 Vendor Table