alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

No. 01-14-00982-CR 

 

In the 

 

Court of Appeals 

 

For the 

 

First District of Texas

 

At Houston 

_________________________________________________________ 

Trial Court Cause No. 13378054 

In the 338th District Court 

of Harris County, Texas 

_________________________________________________________ 

JUAN CARLOS BARRERA-MAGANA, 

Appellant 

v. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

___________________________________________________________

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

 

__________________________________________________________ 

 

 VIVIAN R. KING 

 State Bar No. 00784399 

 2202 Alabama St. 

 Houston, Texas 77004 

 (713) 222-2019 Office 

 (877) 753-6706 eFax 

 Appointed Attorney for Appellant 

ACCEPTED

No. 01-14-00982-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/10/2015 1:16:05 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/10/2015 1:16:05 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
2

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

NOW COMES JUAN CARLOS BARRERA-MAGNA, the Appellant 

herein, and moves the Court for an extension of time to file Appellant's Brief in this 

cause, pursuant to TEX. R. APP. PROC. Rules 10.5 (b)(2) and 38.6(n), and in 

support thereof would show the Court as follows: 

I. 

The Appellant in this cause was convicted by a jury of Murder in the 338th 

District Court of Harris County, Texas in cause number 1338054 and his sentence 

was assessed at Life in Prison in the Texas Department of Corrections, Institutional 

Division. Notice of Appeal was properly filed on December 04, 2014. 

II. 

The Clerk’s record was properly filed on January 28, 2015. 

The Reporter’s record was filed on February 28, 2015. 

Appellant’s brief was due on April 01, 2015. 

This is a voluminous record. The case is complicated.

III. 

No previous extensions have been filed. 

Appellant’s attorney is requesting a 60-day extension of time to file 

Appellant’s Brief to June 01, 2015. 
3

IV. 

Appellant’s attorney is requesting this extension of time to file Appellant’s 

Brief due to multiple trial settings that are demanding an enormous amount of 

preparation time. 

This motion is not made for delay, but instead, to ensure effective assistance 

of counsel.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the undersigned counsel, on 

behalf of Appellant, respectfully prays that this Honorable Court grant this extension 

to June 01, 2015.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, 

/s/ Vivian R. King

VIVIAN R. KING 

 Texas Bar No. 00784399 

 2202 Alabama St.

Houston, Texas 77004 

(713) 222-2019 office 

(877) 753-6706 e Fax 

 VivianRKing@msn.com Email

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 As Attorney of Record for Appellant, I do hereby certify that a true and correct 

copy of the above and foregoing document was emailed to Appellate Division and 

efiled with the office of the Honorable Devon Anderson, Harris County District 

Attorney, on April 10, 2015.

 /s/ Vivian R. King
# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas**

September 7, 201 8

No. 04

- 18

- 00556

- CV

Salim MERCHANT

, Appellant

v.

SOUTH TEXAS MERCHANT ASSOCIATION COOPERATIVE , et al, Appellee s

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017CI14923 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On August 29, 2018, we ordered Appellant to timely show cause in writing that the clerk’s record has been paid. Appellant timely complied; our August 29, 2018 order is satisfied.

We ORDER the Bexar County D istrict C lerk to file the clerk’s record with this court
within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 7th day of September, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1297. SPENCER GILES v. DANIEL GILES.

On December 23, 2014, the trial court entered judgment in favor of Daniel

Giles and against Spencer Giles. On January 23, 2015, Spencer Giles filed a notice

of appeal.

We lack jurisdiction because the appeal is untimely. A notice of appeal must

be filed within 30 days after the entry of the trial court’s order. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). 

The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer

jurisdiction upon thisCourt.Couch v. United PaperworkersIntl. Union, 224 Ga. App.

721 (482 SE2d 704) (1997). Here, Spencer Giles filed his notice of appeal 31 days

after the trial court’s order was entered. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider

this appeal, and it is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/26/2015

March 26, 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 81 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.81
                                     Agreed to December 19, 2019        

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1158, the Clerk of the House 
of Representatives shall make the following correction: Amend the long 
title so as to read: ``Making consolidated appropriations for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 2020, and for other purposes.''.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
PLEASE RETURN THIS CARD

... /;

•* •• i^.

IMMEDIATELY UPON RECEIPT. 4 ^ 'rr ' '

j ij j .j

Date - 9 - SoK

I^ave this d3y received the mandate of the Court of Appeals

VS STATE.

«.H '^^;iN©iNV NVS IV

•f io laneo 3IU HI

OdllJ T^jyni/W/v ^
No. 13-1123 – State of West Virginia v. Keith D. 

FILED 

April 9, 2015 

RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK 

SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Justice Ketchum, dissenting: OF WEST VIRGINIA 

The defendant got “slip-shucked” by the prosecutor. As a result, he was 

sentenced to life in prison, rather than a maximum of ten years per his plea 

agreement with the prosecutor. 

Every prosecutor’s case file contains a defendant’s criminal record with a 

list of prior convictions. The prosecutor knows whether he/she will seek a 

recidivist information charging the defendant with being a habitual offender 

resulting in additional prison time. To the contrary, many times a defendant is 

represented by a court-appointed lawyer, as opposed to a public defender or 

retained lawyer, who is mostly interested in getting the defendant to plead guilty 

and then sending a bill for payment to the State. As a result, the defendant may 

agree to a plea with a relatively short prison sentence and ends up being committed 

to the penitentiary for life. 

It is extremely unfair for the State to agree to a maximum sentence and not 

reveal that it will seek additional prison time soon after the defendant pleads guilty. 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A deal is a deal. The State should not be allowed to entice a defendant to plead 

guilty by agreeing to a plea bargain without informing the defendant that it will 

seek a recidivist information which will result in more prison time. 

We should adopt the court-made law of other states which requires the 

prosecution to notify the defendant that the State is seeking additional, habitual 

offender sentencing before the defendant pleads guilty under the terms of a written 

plea bargain agreement. See People v. Brown, 492 Mich. 684, 822 N.W.2d 208 

(2012); State v. Hayes, 423 So.2d 1111 (La. 1982). This is the fair approach rather 

than the “tricky” approach approved by the majority opinion. 

This defendant got “hoodwinked.” As a result, the defendant will have 

plenty of time to think about it while serving his life sentence. 

I dissent.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, DoD.

# ACTION:

Meeting notice.

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), the Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and 41 CFR 102-3.150, the Department of Defense announces that the following Federal advisory committee meeting of the Defense Advisory Committee on Military Personnel Testing will take place.

# DATES:

Tuesday, May 22, 2012, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. and Wednesday, May 23, 2012, from 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Amalfi Hotel, 20 West Kinzie Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60654.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Committee's Designated Federal Officer or Point of Contact: Dr. Jane M. Arabian, Assistant Director, Accession Policy, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness), Room 3D1066, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000, telephone (703) 697-9271.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Purpose of the Meeting: The purpose of the meeting is to review planned changes and progress in developing computerized and paper-and-pencil tests for military enlistment. Agenda: The agenda includes an overview of current enlistment test development timelines and planned research for the next 3 years.

                    Public's Accessibility to the Meeting: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b and 41 CFR 102-3.140 through 102-3.165, and the availability of space, this meeting is open to the public. Persons desiring to make oral presentations or submit written statements for consideration at the Committee meeting must contact Dr. Jane M. Arabian at the address or telephone number in                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                     no later than May 14, 2012.                

Dated: April 16, 2012.

Aaron Siegel,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2012-9506 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
FILED !N COURT OFAPPEALS

12th Court cl Appeals District"

RE: Case No. 15-0186

COA #: 12-12-00312-CV TC#:

STYLE:GERALD K. JOHNSON

v. CHRISTINE EVANS AND FREDERICK M. EVANS

A petition for review was filed today in the

above-styled case. Respondent may file either a

response, or a waiver of response. If you file a

waiver, the Court will not grant the petition without

first requesting a response. (Tex. R. App . P. 53.3)

There is no fee for a response or a waiver.

MS. CATHY S. LUSK

CLERK, TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

1517 WEST FRONT, SUITE 354

TYLER, TX 75702

EXAS

CATHY S. LUSK, CLi

DATE

3-41481

FILE COPY

4/10/2015
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0430 IN THE MATTER OF: V.K.B., A Youth. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 14, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Beth Baker Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 7 2021

04/07/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0430
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 109 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 109

  To prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from granting a work 
authorization to an alien found to have been unlawfully present in the 
                             United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

 Mr. Burgess introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from granting a work 
authorization to an alien found to have been unlawfully present in the 
                             United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equal Protection for American 
Workers Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN WORK AUTHORIZATIONS.

    Effective beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of Homeland Security is prohibited from granting a work 
authorization to an alien who has been finally determined, in a valid 
immigration proceeding during which due process was afforded, to have 
been at any time unlawfully present in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 72 (Friday, April 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 22310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8955]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings <greek-i>1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC12-92-000.
    Applicants: Noble Americas Gas & Power Corp., Eagle Point Power 
Generation LLC.
    Description: Application for Approval Pursuant to Section 203 of 
the Federal Power Act, Request for Expedited Consideration and Request 
for Privileged Treatment of Eagle Point Power Generation LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 4/4/12.
    Accession Number: 20120404-5227.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/25/12.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1120-001.
    Applicants: ITC Midwest LLC.
    Description: Amendment Filing to be effective 4/19/2012.
    Filed Date: 4/4/12.
    Accession Number: 20120404-5177.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/25/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1445-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Ministerial Clean-Up Filing due to Overlapping Filings 
to be effective 2/18/2012.
    Filed Date: 4/4/12.
    Accession Number: 20120404-5195.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/25/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1446-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: Tariff Volume 4--Compliance Filing to be effective 4/
4/2012.
    Filed Date: 4/4/12.
    Accession Number: 20120404-5204.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/25/12.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: April 5, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8955 Filed 4-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 10.24

                                  Leonard Osser
                               110 E. 71st Street
                               New York, NY 10021

                                 March 29, 2002

Mr. Thomas Stuckey
Milestone Scientific Inc
220 South Orange Ave
Livingston, NJ 07039

Dear Tom:

Please be advised that I have agreed to defer $320,000 of my annual $350,000
salary for 2002 until January 2, 2003 except out of the proceeds of new equity
financing and provided that Milestone pays me $2,500 per month.

                                               Very truly yours,


                                               Leonard Osser
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 30305

HASSAN A. ABDUL, IV , Petitioner

- Appellant

v. ROBERT C. TANNER, WARDEN, B. B. RAYBURN CORRECTIONAL CENTER , Respondent

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:17

- CV

- 9108

Before SMITH, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, C ircuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Hassan A. Abdul, IV, Louisiana prisoner # 384790, was convicted by a jury of attempted second degree murder and pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by a felon. State v. Abdul , 131 So.3d 365, 366 (La. Ct. App. 2013) ; State v. Abdul , 94 So.3d 801, 807 (La. Ct. App. 2012)

. The district court dismissed with prejudice Abdul’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application. Abdul has filed a motion for a certificate of appealability (COA). Abdul’s motion for leave to supplement his COA mo tion is GRANTED.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 10, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-30305 Document: 00515338941 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/10/2020No. 19

- 30305

2 In his motion for a COA, Abdul argues that the district court erred in dismissing his claims that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, that his initial trial counsel was ineffective for failing to notify him about a cha nge in appointed counsel , that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate the confiscation of his legal material, and that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to provide him with a copy of the victim’s medical records. To obtain a C OA, Abdul must make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When a district court has denied relief on the merits, the movant “must demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the district court’s ass essment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong , ” S lack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) , or that “the issues presented a re adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further , ” Miller

- El v. Cockre ll , 537 U.S. 322, 3 27 (2003). Because Abdul has not met these standards with respect to the above

- listed claims, his COA motion is DENIED. Abdul challenges the denial of his motion to stay his § 2254 proceedings. “A COA is not required to review the district court’s ruling on a non

- merits iss ue such as a stay.” Young v. Stephens , 795 F.3d 484, 494 (5th Cir. 2015). Abdul has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion to stay proceedings

. See Rhines v. Weber , 544 U.S. 269, 277

- 78 (2005). The district c ourt ’s den ial of Abdul’s motion to stay the proceeding s is AFFIRMED. Case: 19-30305 Document: 00515338941 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/10/2020
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A0851. AMERICAN TALENT AGENCY et al. v. WILSON et al.

The appellantsin this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed

by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rules 22 (a) and 23 (a), regarding the filing

of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was

docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On February 17, 2015, this Court

ordered the appellants to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than

February 23, 2015. As of the date of this order, the appellants' brief and enumeration

of errors still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and

is hereby ORDERED dismissed. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/23/2015

March 23, 2015
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1088 

To authorize the Society of the First Infantry Division to make modifications 

to the First Division Monument located on Federal land in Presidential 

Park in District of Columbia, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2019 

Mr. MARSHALL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Society of the First Infantry Division to 

make modifications to the First Division Monument located on Federal land in Presidential Park in District 

of Columbia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘First Infantry Rec5 ognition of Sacrifice in Theater Act’’ or the ‘‘FIRST Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION TO FIRST DIVISION MONUMENT. 

7 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Society of the First In8 fantry Division (an organization described in section 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1088 IH

1 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and ex2 empt from taxation under section 501(a) of that code), 

3 may make modifications (including construction of addi4 tional plaques and stone plinths on which to put the 

5 plaques) to the First Division Monument located on Fed6 eral land in Presidential Park in District of Columbia that 

7 was set aside for memorial purposes of the First Infantry 

8 Division, in order to honor the members of the First In9 fantry Division who paid the ultimate sacrifice during 

10 United States operations, including Operation Desert 

11 Storm, Operation Iraqi Freedom and New Dawn, and Op12 eration Enduring Freedom. The First Infantry Division 

13 at the Department of the Army shall collaborate with the 

14 Department of Defense to provide to the Society of the 

15 First Infantry Division the list of names to be added. 

16 (b) NON-APPLICATION OF COMMEMORATIVE WORKS

17 ACT.—Subsections (b) and (c) of section 8903 of title 40, 

18 United States Code (commonly known as the ‘‘Commemo19 rative Works Act’’), shall not apply to actions taken under 

20 subsection (a) of this section. 

21 (c) FUNDING.—Federal funds may not be used to pay 

22 any expense of the activities of the Society of the First 

23 Infantry Division which are authorized by this section. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS