alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (1)   | the                Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Secured Diversified Investment,                Ltd. for                the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the                year                ended December 31, 2006, fairly presents in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of Secured Diversified                Investment, Ltd.. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: | /s/                Jan Wallace                                |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Jan                Wallace                              |
|  Title:    |  Principal                Executive Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  December                28, 2007                        |
|   By: |  /s/                Munjit Johal                         |
|  Name:     |  Munjit                Johal                             |
|  Title:    |  Principal                Financial Officer              |
|  Date:     |  December                281, 2007                       |
# Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District

JUNE 29, 2016

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b).

1. Case No. SD34130

Re: DERON SHANTA LEWIS,

Movant-Appellant,

vs. STATE OF MISSOURI,

Respondent-Respondent.
### M A N D A T E

TO THE 139TH DISTRICT COURT of HIDALGO COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 20th day of

November, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

CITY OF ALAMO, TEXAS AND

ALAMO ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellants,

v.

HERIBERTO OSUNA, Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-13-00317-CV (Tr.Ct.No. C-3570-12-C)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be REVERSED and

RENDERED

. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and

RENDERS a judgment of dismissal. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against

appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 23red day of February, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of PortalPlayer, Inc., on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Gary Johnson, President and Chief Executive Officer, and I, Svend-Olav Carlsen, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my
knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PortalPlayer, Inc.



Dated: November 10, 2005



|                                      |  |                          
|------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------
|/s/    GARY JOHNSON                   |  | /s/    SVEND-OLAV CARLSEN
|Gary Johnson                          |  | Svend-Olav Carlsen       
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  | Chief Financial Officer
Fruit & Specialty Crops 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.

Vegetable Inspection Room 1536-S, STOP 0240

Program Division Washington, DC 20250-0240

March 4, 2015

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1

COMMODITY SPECIFICATION

CANNED VEGETABLES DATED SEPTEMBER 2014

The purpose of this amendment is to revise Section V. Exhibits to update America’s Finest 

Labels.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

Attachments
V. Exhibits

Exhibit 1-1

Can Label for Canned Asparagus, No. 300 size

Exhibit 1-2

Can Label for Canned Green Beans, No. 10 size

http://www.choosemyplate.gov/print-materials-ordering/graphic-resources.html
Exhibit 1-3

Can Label for Canned Green Beans, No. 300 size

Exhibit 1-5

Can Label for Canned Carrots, No. 300 size

http://www.choosemyplate.gov/print-materials-ordering/graphic-resources.html
Exhibit 1-6

Can Label for Canned Whole Kernel Corn, No. 10 size

Exhibit 1-7

Can Label for Canned Whole Kernel Corn, No. 300 size

http://www.choosemyplate.gov/print-materials-ordering/graphic-resources.html
Exhibit 1-8

Can Label for Canned Cream Style Corn, No. 300 size

Exhibit 1-10

Can Label for Canned Peas, No. 10 size

http://www.choosemyplate.gov/print-materials-ordering/graphic-resources.html
Exhibit 1-11

Can Label for Canned Peas, No. 300 size

Exhibit 1-12

Can Label for Canned Potatoes, No. 300 size

http://www.choosemyplate.gov/print-materials-ordering/graphic-resources.html
Exhibit 1-13

Can Label for Canned Pumpkin, No. 300 size 

Exhibit 1-14

Can Label for Canned Salsa, No. 10 size

http://www.choosemyplate.gov/print-materials-ordering/graphic-resources.html
Exhibit 1-15

Can Label for Canned Vegetable Soup, No. 1 size

Exhibit 1-16

Can Label for Canned Tomato Soup, No. 1 size

http://www.choosemyplate.gov/print-materials-ordering/graphic-resources.html
Exhibit 1-17

Can Label for Canned Spaghetti Sauce, No. 10 size

Exhibit 1-18

Can Label for Canned Spaghetti Sauce, No. 300 size

http://www.choosemyplate.gov/print-materials-ordering/graphic-resources.html
Exhibit 1-19

Can Label for Canned Spinach, No. 300 size

Exhibit 1-22

Can Label for Canned Sweet Potatoes, No. 300 size

http://www.choosemyplate.gov/print-materials-ordering/graphic-resources.html
Exhibit 1-23

Can Label for Canned Tomatoes, No. 10 size

Exhibit 1-24

Can Label for Canned Tomatoes, No. 300 size

http://www.choosemyplate.gov/print-materials-ordering/graphic-resources.html
Exhibit 1-25

Can Label for Canned Tomato Paste, No. 10 size

Exhibit 1-26

Can Label for Canned Tomato Sauce, No. 10 size

http://www.choosemyplate.gov/print-materials-ordering/graphic-resources.html
Exhibit 1-27

Can Label for Canned Tomato Sauce, No. 300 size

http://www.choosemyplate.gov/print-materials-ordering/graphic-resources.html
* i* 01*11 on ^ffiwSft^

J^ Vnod^uxrgW-—Lq—ufoL—o.^<UjQ^t^x>-^^^t)cc^_o^-c^^h^ ~C(Lfc(L/&jL-rf£.-

_ez>»^_M^0L^iLJjLc_.cou«<-»- <^,'_t_<U\«_J!fflu«_Oudulcc-jftC_4s&:i5-W««-< c2.£^_aay_K.w&. ^ uMtr.si,s^c}_

Q/^ v^^^.^w Is c. ^^ig-n-V fL*> #• j^sy- *"**•> "k> r<jle- i^ftyi. T'EAP &f&«Js Lr.

_£t_p_>__fclu. cd«„_A£>_\K^/uVi^l. ^^ nc/<g>JP-0—-Q<*- C<^>i'fe5_^> bs. VcJccL&iJS^A<>_kL±

iaxA^L-b*^^!^* CCjx^ &.£• Jaw oou9 .•jo ^-'LT log.<j ^_gu_x»>As nn,7 ib^jb/Lc^tg£>k__»»' •-£

_W!5^».W_(^AtL_tf>__C«j3y-__£)J: f*-<- o^f- Jl 'fa'igct-^tvn_U-c- 5""* c^&^-vl^^ew^-g>.r-tfpi«=*.«»/s JKrp .Vi Jt^-itL -^U. py-iA ju^il -r-cy u*>j" Q--nct tU. o^Aq- Wt^t«/.a dr»^\ >^^k>- \ht~ & d»s\J*J-

)\. golf j^l- o^xj- £ (^*-*X>-.3 g^'-y, l-UiJ^'y +U1V <^U<ir5 Up ^

om 6Ac?<i
^0^-t_-^)g~,„<tcl Il_^L y^v, ri*r »cw t-'Vio _aq| k-l/o ^j^v H~A rn&^o

KCrC.***

_^K_£cL

«__<5^d«rsLbl ^?^fe=; .__L

ThCCL&A&JXG&l Aflph^j ft* ^

O....U.-UJ^r^At 1

'/&D-^.i--Lc_ftcL.

I^U\toj>^4cl.__l^,__l.'Z8_kt).
To Tl_ l-l_,_>rJ.L C_„^ (^^jbjvr-u-01kji-r.CL s-jg-hs:

j£^__J~j0<j\Al kL^_Jc^_J^C__^^Al^£oA^^ i-jhlck^<do*3 l-Le .Sa>_^^.Sjkn^o\r^

i4«_ ^gth^-ir cys___rc>)*cL_«|?»i.JItviAk—sjcj Wi_y»v_-+-iV**__ci/»J—l_j^o)o_fJ___jl>Ta/^-.

_CIe_t.^__^/>d_cs4_e.ld_

„rD.X(LTJt-l8-7-r65^L

jaOQ-Uiker^CV^

l^/^^J^^TM.

UJAC^ej

_j4^1je^J_y_/^__T«

IE

eouRroF
Order entered October 14, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals

Jfiftf) JSfatrict of flfexa* at ©alias!

No. 05-13-01141-CR

JEREMY JOHN SANDERSFELD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-82341-07

ORDER

On September 4, 2014, the Court granted appellant an extension until November 10, 2014

to file his pro se response to the Anders brief filed by counsel. The Court now has before it

appellant's October 10, 2014 request for an extension until December 10, 2014 file his response

and also to use rule of appellate procedure 2 to allow him to file only one copy ofthe brief.

As to his extension request, appellant asserts that the Collin County CSCD has retained

counsel to represent "their interest." The only parties to this appeal are appellant and the State of

Texas, represented by the Collin County District Attorney's Office. The Collin County District

Attorney's Office has already responded that it will not be filing a brief, and the only "briefs"

that will be filed in this appeal are the Anders brief filed by counsel and appellant's pro se

response. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, we DENY the extension request. Appellant's pro se response remains due

November 10, 2014. If the response is not filed by the date specified, the appeal will be

submitted on the Anders brief alone.

We GRANT appellant's motion to the extent that he is only required to file one copy of

his pro se response.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies ofthis order, by electronic transmission, to Pamela

Lakatos and John Rolater.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first-class mail, to Jeremy

Sandersfeld, TDCJ No. 1875695, Luther Unit, 1800 Luther Dr., Navasota, Texas 77868.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.12.1


 


Amendment #1


 


Consulting Agreement dated October 17, 2016 between

ProMIS Neurosciences, Inc. and Danforth Advisors, LLC


 


This Amendment No. 1 to Consulting
Agreement (“Amendment”) is made as of March 27, 2017 (“Effective Date”), by and between ProMIS Neurosciences,
Inc. (“Company”) and Danforth Advisors, LLC (“Consultant” or “Danforth”). Capitalized terms used but
not defined herein shall have the respective meaning set forth in the Consulting Agreement by and between Danforth Advisors and the Company
dated as of October 17, 2016 (“Agreement”).


 


WHEREAS, Danforth is
engaged by the Company under the terms and conditions of the Consulting Agreement; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and Consultant mutually desire to amend the scope of the Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained and for the other good and valuable consideration,
receipt of which is hereby acknowledge, the parties hereby agree as follows:


 


		·	Exhibit A, Description of Services and Schedule of Fees, shall be hereby modified to:



 


		o	Add Kristi Lanier as a VP of Finance Consultant at an hourly rate of $215/hour. The Services to be provided
are more fully described in Exhibit A-1.



 


		o	Replace the Fee Section entirely, as illustrated in Exhibit A-1. Notably, the CFO Services provided by
Daniel Geffken will now be provided under a retainer agreement.



 


		·	Except as specifically provided for in this Amendment, the terms of the Agreement shall be unmodified
and shall remain in full force and effect.



 


This Amendment may be executed in one or more
counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original instrument, but all of which shall be considered one and the same Amendment,
and shall become binding when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment
has been executed by the Company and Danforth Advisors, LLC to be effective as of the date first above written.


 


********


 






    


     


    

 


	
    DANFORTH ADVISORS, LLC 

    

    

    

    
	 	
    PROMIS NEUROSCIENCES, INC. 

    

    

    

    

	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Gregg Beloff            	 	By:	/s/ Eugene Williams                             
	Print Name: Gregg Beloff	 	Print Name: Eugene Williams
	Title: Managing Director	 	Title: Executive Chairman
	Date: 3/30/17	 	Date: 3/28/17


 






    


     


    

 





EXHIBIT A-1


 


Description of Additional Services


 


[Intentionally Omitted]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-4819
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. JEREMIAS NATHAN ZETINO-RIVERA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:05-cr-00030-RLV) Submitted: February 21, 2008 Decided: February 25, 2008 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert H. Hale, Jr., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.*Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Jeremias Nathan Zetino-Rivera pleaded guilty, pursuant to a plea agr eement, to one count of using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to, and possessing a firearm in furtherance of, a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (2000). The district court sentenced Zetino-Rivera to the statutory minimum of sixty months of imprisonment. Zetino-Rivera timely appealed. On appeal, counsel has filed an Anders * brief, in which he states there are no meritorious issues for appeal, but questions whether the district court acted unreasonably when it failed to consider the evidence offered by Zetino-Rivera in support of his motion for a variance below the statutory minimum sentence. Zetino-Rivera was advised of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief, but has not filed a brief. The Government declined to file a brief. We affirm. Zetino-Rivera’s sentence was the mandatory minimum sentence. The district court properly recognized that, absent a substantial assistance motion filed by the government pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(e) (West 2000 & Supp. 2007), it lacked authority to sentence Zetino-Rivera below the statutory mandatory minimum sentence. See United States v. Allen , 450 F.3d 565, 568-69 (4th Cir. 2006).- 3 - In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm Zetino-Rivera’s conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform Zetino-Rivera, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Zetino-Rivera requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Zetino-Rivera. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Fiscal Year 2024 Quarter 1 

FGIS User Fee Accounts

Revenue Obligations1 Earnings / Loss 

Operating 

Reserve 

U.S. Grain Standards Act 

Inspection & Weighing $6,243,245 $9,208,541 -$2,965,296 -$3,469,566

Official Agencies $86,453 $400,739 -$314,286 -$18,751

Agricultural Marketing Act 

Rice $1,491,522 $1,485,126 $6,396 $1,783,495

Commodities $269,070 $491,528 -$222,458 $912,887

Fiscal Year 2024 Total $8,090,290 $11,585,934 -$3,495,644 -$791,935

1 Obligations contain some full year obligations to support the program during fiscal year 2024 (such 

as rent, communications, utilities, and annual maintenance contracts).

Dated 02/02/2024
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


The following certification accompanies the registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-K and is not filed as provided in SEC Release Nos. 33-8212, 34-47551 and
IC-25967, dated March 21, 2003.



                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002


            In connection with the Annual Report of Lexington Precision
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chairman of the Board,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

            (1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                         /s/  Michael A. Lubin
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                         Michael A. Lubin
                                         Chairman of the Board
                                         (Co-Principal Executive Officer)
                                         March 27, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 24, 2014

s0616

Order 

Clerk

June 24, 2014

148619

MICHAEL MORAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 148619

COA: 304281

Manistee CC: 07-012845-CZ

DENNIS RISSER and MANISTEE-BENZIE

COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH BOARD,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit 31.1**

Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification

I, Rajesh Kalathur, certify that:

​

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of John Deere Owner Trust 2024-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

​

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

​

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing, and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

​

4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

​

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

​

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association (as indenture trustee).

​

​

| 4                      | ​ | ​                                     |
|------------------------|---------|---------------------------------------------|
| Date: January 24, 2025 | By:     | */s/ Rajesh Kalathur*                       |
| ​                | ​ | Rajesh Kalathur                             |
| ​                | ​ | President of John Deere Capital Corporation |
| ​                | ​ | (as Servicer)                               |

​

----
Fruit & Specialty Crops 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.

Vegetable Inspection Room 1536-S, STOP 0240

Program Division Washington, DC 20250-0240

December 27, 2012

 AMENDMENT NO. 3

 COMMODITY SPECIFICATION

 CANNED VEGETABLES DATED FEBRUARY 2012

The purpose of this amendment is to allow for a specified color of Hominy to include white color 

in section II Individual Commodity Specifications, subsection S.2.

 

 2. Color- White or Golden (yellow), as specified on the applicable Solicition.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.