alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1





Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.








This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 11, 2023 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2023-4 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.  I further certify as follows:





1. I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from October 11, 2023 through December 31, 2023, and its performance under the Agreement.





2. To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.








AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.





By:/s/ Connie CoffeyDated:March 4, 2024Connie CoffeyExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32


                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                       CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Shane Lowry,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Quantum
Energy Inc. (the "Company"),  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:

(i)
      the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
      ended May 31,  2007  (the  "Quarterly  Report")  fully  complies  with the
      requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and

(ii)
      the information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

By:
           /s/ Shane Lowry
           -------------------------------------------
Name:      Shane Lowry
Title:     Chief Executive Officer and
           Chief Financial Officer
Date:      July 18 , 2007


This  written  statement  is being  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB.  A
signed  original of this  statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.


This certification  accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall  not,  except to the
extent  required  by such Act, be deemed  filed by the  Company for  purposes of
Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as amended (the  "Exchange
Act").  Such  certification  will not be deemed to be  incorporated by reference
into any filing under the  Securities  Act of 1933, as amended,  or the Exchange
Act,  except to the extent  that the  Company  specifically  incorporates  it by
reference.
# C_2004094EN.01004201.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/42

---

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 21 January 2004

in Case T-217/03 R Fédération nationale de la coopération bétail et viande (FNCBV) v Commission of the European Communities

(Interim proceedings - Competition - Payment of a fine - Bank guarantee - Prima facie case - Urgency - Balance of interests - Partial and conditional suspension)

(2004/C 94/120)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-217/03 R: Fédération nationale de la coopération bétail et viande (FNCBV), established in Paris (France), represented by R. Collin and M. Ponsard, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg, supported by the French Republic (agents: G. de Bergues and F. Million), against Commission of the European Communities (agents: P. Oliver and O. Beynet) — application for dispensation from the obligation to provide a bank guarantee in order to avoid enforcement of the fine of EUR 480 000 imposed by Commission Decision 2003/600/EC of 2 April 2003 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 of the EC Treaty (Case COMP/C.38.279/F3 — French beef) (OJ 2003 L 209, p. 12) — the President of the Court of First Instance, made an order on 21 January 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1) | For a period of two months from the date of notification of this order, the obligation on the applicant to provide a bank guarantee for the Commission in order to avoid immediate recovery of the fine imposed on it by Article 3 of Commission Decision 2003/600/EC of 2 April 2003 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 of the EC Treaty (Case COMP/C.38.279/F3 — French beef) is suspended, provided that, within a period of four weeks from the same date, the applicant pays to the Commission the sum of EUR 140 000 and provides a bank guarantee of EUR 60 000 or, alternatively, provides a bank guarantee of EUR 200 000; |
| --- | --- |

1)

For a period of two months from the date of notification of this order, the obligation on the applicant to provide a bank guarantee for the Commission in order to avoid immediate recovery of the fine imposed on it by Article 3 of Commission Decision 2003/600/EC of 2 April 2003 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 of the EC Treaty (Case COMP/C.38.279/F3 — French beef) is suspended, provided that, within a period of four weeks from the same date, the applicant pays to the Commission the sum of EUR 140 000 and provides a bank guarantee of EUR 60 000 or, alternatively, provides a bank guarantee of EUR 200 000;

| 2) | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2)

The costs are reserved.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 28 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 28

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2019, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2019 (division C of Public Law 115-245) is further 
amended by

              

 striking the date specified in section 105(3) and inserting ``February 
28, 2019''.
     This joint resolution may be cited as the ``Further Additional 
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2019''.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 23, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 28

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2019, and for 
                            other purposes.
```
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-14-00597-CR

Style: Jody Wayne Whelchel v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: March 31, 2015

Type of motions: Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time

Parties filing motions: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: December 31, 2014

Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: May 9, 2015

Date Requested: August 9, 2015

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

The motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief is denied as premature 

without prejudice to refiling because although the supplemental clerk’s record was 

filed, and the trial court set May 9, 2015, as appellant’s new counsel’s brief deadline, 

this case remains abated until the supplemental reporter’s record is filed, as requested

by this Court’s February 3, 2015 Order of Abatement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(3).

Thus, after the case is reinstated, the Clerk of this Court will notify counsel and may 

re-set the briefing deadlines. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a)(2).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 

Date: April 9, 2015
AMS Additional Guidance for exports of egg and egg product for Mexico –

Additional Documents Required by Mexican Import Officials under Article 89 of the Animal Health Law.

AMS has received several inquiries concerning additional information such as lot numbers, production

and shipping date, and best before dates on items related to egg and egg food products.  AMS has been

informed by the government of Mexico that this information should be provided on company letterhead

and must be signed by the owner, company president, quality control manager, or someone in a similar

position.  The document must refer back to the AMS certificate number (found in top left corner of AMS

export certificate).  This will provide the linkage between the company letter, AMS export certificate,

and the product.  The Mexican officials have stated that product presented at a port of entry without

the referenced information will be refused entry.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 36 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 36

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                      relating to parental rights.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2019

 Mr. Banks (for himself, Mr. Mooney of West Virginia, Mr. Posey, Mrs. 
 Hartzler, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Babin, Mr. Olson, Mr. Watkins, 
 Mrs. Lesko, Mr. Wright, Mr. Meadows, Mr. Budd, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Yoho, 
 and Mr. Walberg) submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                      relating to parental rights.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The liberty of parents to direct the upbringing, 
education, and care of their children is a fundamental right.
    ``Section 2. The parental right to direct education includes the 
right to choose, as an alternative to public education, private, 
religious, or home schools, and the right to make reasonable choices 
within public schools for one's child.
    ``Section 3. Neither the United States nor any State shall infringe 
these rights without demonstrating that its governmental interest as 
applied to the person is of the highest order and not otherwise served.
    ``Section 4. The parental rights guaranteed by this article shall 
not be denied or abridged on account of disability.
    ``Section 5. This article shall not be construed to apply to a 
parental action or decision that would end life.''.
                                 <all>
```
•j]"AT!0: i RD M PILOT/GUIDE , LTD . 42 0 Frw t Stree t - Ketchikan , AK

9990 1 phoac : 907-225-197 4 E-nuU k bqib mJn(Slrd>ipilotcoB i Web : www.alukaseapluetoan.coi n Feb . 1,201 0 U S Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Docke t Managemen t

System , M-3 0 Wes t Buildin g Groun dFloo r RoomW12-14 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , SE . Washington , D C 2059 0 Dea r Sir : Rd M Pilot/Guide , Ltd . Doin g busines s a t 42 0 Fron t

Street , Ketchika n Alask a99901 , i s requesting t o petitio n th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n for acontinuatio n exemptio n t o permi t aircraA flight

operatio n unde r

VF RFligh t

Rule s (VFR ) outsid e controlle d airspac e ove r

wate r a t a n altitud e belo w 50 0 feet . Thi s exemptio n i s readily use db y ou r compan y an di n bot hth e Pacifi c Northwes t region an dher e locall y i n Ketchikan , b y othe r operators . In ligh t

o f ou r previou s operation s o f thi s typ e i n SouthEas t

Alask aan dthos e i n th e Pacifi c Northwest , the y ca n b e carrie dou t safely . Withweathe r

phenomeno n o f

bette r flight visibility unde r

th e clou dbas e withi n thi s region, Rd M Pilot/Guide , Ltd . wil l mor e safel y an deffectivel y serv e th e publi c interes t throug hmor e reliable transportatio n i n asafe r flyin g environmen t

for bot hth e pilo t an dpassengers . Ou r re^petition scope : Sectio n o f

th e FA RAffecte d- Sectio n 135.203(a)(1 ) provides , i n pertinen t part , tha t excep t whe n necessar y for

takeof f an dlandings , n o perso n ma y operat e an airplan e unde r VFR , durin g th e day , belo w 500ft . abov e th e surfac e o r

les s tha n 500fl . horizontall y froman y obstacle . Rd M Pilot/Guid e Ltd.* s supportiv e informatio n i s a s follows : W e conduc t

operation s exclusivel y i n aseaplan e unde r ou r ai r taxi/commercia l operato r certificat e No.Y3RA l 78 J i n SouthEas t Alaska . Al l application s for whic hthi s exemptio n i s bein g sough t ar e operation s conducte ddurin g da y VF Rcondition s a t tru e

### airspeed s no t exceedin g 13 0 knot s an dconfine dt o th e waterway s (inlets , bay s an d channel s ) o f

Southern Southeas t

Alaska .

Rd M Pilot/Guid e Ltd.' s continue dexemptio n woul dno t adversel y affec t

safet y o f ou r flight . Gu r

operation s unde r

thi s exemptio n create s aleve l o f safety equa l t o tha t

for whic hth e exemptio n i s sough t a s Indicate db y th e existin g exen^o n provide dt o othe r carriers . W e hop e tha t

thi s request

i s accepte dagai n wit hou r purpos e t o strengthe n th e safet y o f ou r operation s i n Southeas t

Alaska . A diagra mo f

ou r are ao n file wit hyo u high-light s ou r mappe dare ao f

operation . Thankyo u fo r

consideratio n i n thi s matter...pleas e contac t u s b y phon e a t

907-225-1974 . O r email : ryan@alaskaseaplanetours.co m Withhighes t

Regards ,

RdM Pilot/GiudeO^td .

cc . Dou g Wahto , PO I Junea u FSDO-0 5
Microsoft Word - Amendment No. 3 to Billali Agmt (5-15-20) clean (1).docx


AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT

 

This amendment no. 3 (the “Amendment”) amends the purchase agreement by and between Billali Mine, LLC and JC Imperial, LLC (collectively, the “Seller”) and Mineral Acquisitions, LLC (“Buyer”) dated on or about January 4, 2019, amended on March 7, 2019, and further amended on January 21, 2020 (collectively referred to as the “Purchase Agreement”), and is dated effective May 1, 2020 (“Effective Date”).

 

WHEREAS, the Seller and Buyer desire to amend the Purchase Agreement to reflect revised payment terms of the Purchase Agreement;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above, and for other good and valuable consideration including the desire to work together during the COVID-19 pandemic and concurrent economic uncertainty, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 

1.Amended and Restated Section 2.B. Section 2.B of the Purchase Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

 

“B. Payment of the Purchase Price. The Total Purchase Price will be paid as follows:

(i)Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) has been paid by Buyer to Seller on or about the Effective Date as noted above. 

(ii)Commencing July 1, 2020, and continuing with 19 subsequent payments every 30 days thereafter, Buyer will pay to Seller the sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) per period. 

(iii)Commencing 30 days after the last payment in (ii) above and continuing with 48 subsequent payments every 30 days thereafter, Buyer will pay to Seller the sum of One Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($175,000.00) per period with 49th and final payment in the amount of One Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000.00) completing purchase. 

(iv)Each payment made hereunder will be allocated Twenty-Five per cent (25%) to the Billali and Seventy-Five percent (75%) to the Jim Crow, Imperial group of mines as previously outlined.” 

2.No Other Amendments or Supplements. Except as set forth in Sections 1 and 7 hereof, the Purchase Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as currently in effect. 

 

3.Severability. Should any one or more of the provisions of this Amendment be determined to be illegal or unenforceable, all other provisions of this Amendment shall be given effect separately from the provision or provisions determined to be illegal or unenforceable and shall not be effected thereby.
DISirmC T ATTORNKY' S OFFIC E 

33- " & 424 " Judicia l District s 

COUNTIE S O F 

BLAKC O • BUBNS T • IXAN O • SA N SAB A 

Wiley B. McAfee 

District Attorney 

April 9, 2015 

Mr. Jeffery D. Kyle 

Clerk of Court of Appeals 

P. O. Box 12457 

Austin, TX 78711 

Re: Case No. 03-15-(f0213-CR; Ex parte Kelly James McCarty 

Appeal from Cau^e No. 30842C in the 33rd District Court of Burnet County 

Dear Mr. Kyle: 

Please accept this letter as our designation of Lead Counsel for the State of 

Texas, Appellee, in the ^bove described case. Lead Counsel for this case Is: 

Gary W. Bunyard 

Assistant District Attorney 

P.O. Box 725 

Llano, TX 78643 ' 

(325) 247-5755 dvoice) 

(325) 247-5274 |fax) 

g.bunyard@co.llano.tx.us 

Texas State Bar Mo. 03353500 

Sincerely, 

W/bunyard 

assistant District Attorney 

cc: Kelly James McCarty 

Appellant Pro Se | 

via eServe 

811 Berry Stre^-P.O. Box 725 • Uano. Texas 78643 • 325-247-5755 • Fax 325-247-5274 

ACCEPTED

03-15-00213-CR

4818227

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/9/2015 8:17:45 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/9/2015 8:17:45 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
National Organic Standards Board 

Crops Committee 

2012 Sunset Proposed Recommendation 

Magnesium Sulfate 

March 2, 2011 

List: §205.601 Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic crop production. 

(j) As plant or soil amendments. 

(5) Magnesium sulfate—allowed with a documented soil deficiency. 

Committee Summary 

The Crops Committee requested and received a new Technical Report on this material. The 

CC did not find the TR to be sufficient and has sent it back with questions addressing the 

differences in natural and synthetic magnesium sulfate, availability of both, and both form’s 

functionality as soil amendments and foliar sprays. The majority of the CC felt that having the 

synthetic form of magnesium sulfate on the National list was inconsistent with organic crop 

production. The minority voted to keep this material on the list pending further technical review 

because of its long use and historic acceptance for use in organic crop production. 

Committee Recommendations 

The Crops Committee recommends against the continued listing of Magnesium sulfate—

allowed with a documented soil deficiency as a soil amendment. The motion was to continue 

the listing of Magnesium sulfate—allowed with a documented soil deficiency as a plant or soil 

amendment. 

Committee Vote 

Motion: To relist magnesium sulfate on § 205.601 

Motion by: Tina Ellor Second: Nick Maravell 

Yes: 2 No: 3 Absent: 2 Abstain: 0 Recuse: 0
Order filed, November 03, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00890-CV

____________

IN THE ESTATE OF EUGENE FROST, DECEASED, Appellant

On Appeal from the Probate Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PR-0075472

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due October 19, 2015. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order John Partain, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
Order entered April 9, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01671-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.L.B., A MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 06-0634-59

ORDER

After reviewing the Clerk’s Record on file, this Court has determined relevant documents 

have not been included. 

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c)(1), we ORDER the Clerk of the 

59th Judicial District Court in Grayson County to file within TEN DAYS of the date of this 

order a supplemental clerk’s record containing the following documents:

(1) Respondent’s no-evidence motion for summary judgment filed on August 9, 2013

and

(2) Petitioner’s general denial response to no-evidence motion for summary judgment 

filed by attorney John Mabary (date unknown).

If the above documents do not exist or cannot be located, please inform the Court in 

writing. 
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 4/7/2015 11:51:44 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
----

EXHIBIT 23
 

 

 

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 2-54345, 2-63803, 2-75715, 2-88474, 2-96491, 33-32465, 33-57537, 333-77867, 333-77869, 333-77871, 333-77873 on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement Nos.33-55136, 33-53817, 33-57325, 33-59784, 333-631, 333-63441, 333-65901, 333-68751, 333-71071 and 333-74349 on Form S-3 of our report dated November 1, 2000 (except for Note 17, as to which the date is December 20, 2000), appearing in this Annual Report onForm 10-K of Bergen Brunswig Corporation for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000.

Our audits of the financial statements referred to in our aforementioned report also included the financial statement schedule of Bergen Brunswig Corporation, listed in Item 14(a)(2).  This financial statement schedule is theresponsibility of the Corporation's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.  In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presentsfairly in all material respects the information set forth herein.

 

 

/s/   Deloitte & Touche LLP
Costa Mesa, California
December 26, 2000