alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004094EN.01000201.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/2

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

16 March 2004

In Joined Cases C-264/01, C-306/01, C-354/01 and C-355/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf and from the Bundesgerichtshof): AOK Bundesverband and Others v Ichthyol-Gesellschaft Cordes, Hermani & Co., Mundipharma GmbH, Gödecke GmbH, Intersan, Institut für pharmazeutische und klinische Forschung GmbH (1)

1

(Competition - Undertakings - Sickness funds - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Interpretation of Articles 81 EC, 82 EC and 86 EC - Decisions of groups of sickness funds determining maximum amounts paid in respect of medicinal products))

(2004/C 94/03)

Language of the case: German

In Joined Cases C-264/01, C-306/01, C-354/01 and C-355/01: References to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) and by the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) for preliminary rulings in the proceedings pending before those courts between AOK Bundesverband, Bundesverband der Betriebskrankenkassen (BKK), Bundesverband der Innungskrankenkassen, Bundesverband der landwirtschaftlichen Krankenkassen, Verband der Angestelltenkrankenkassen eV, Verband der Arbeiter-Ersatzkassen, Bundesknappschaft, See-Krankenkasse and Ichthyol-Gesellschaft Cordes, Hermani & Co. (C-264/01), Mundipharma GmbH (C-306/01), Gödecke GmbH (C-354/01), Intersan, Institut für pharmazeutische und klinische Forschung GmbH (C-355/01), on the interpretation of Articles 81 EC, 82 EC and 86 EC, the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, C. Gulmann, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues and A. Rosas (Presidents of Chambers), J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen, F. Macken, N. Colneric and S. von Bahr (Rapporteur), Judges; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; H.A. Rühl, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 16 March 2004, in which it has ruled:

Groups of sickness funds, such as the AOK Bundesverband, the Bundesverband der Betriebskrankenkassen (BKK), the Bundesverband der Innungskrankenkassen, the Bundesverband der landwirtschaftlichen Krankenkassen, the Verband der Angestelltenkrankenkassen eV, the Verband der Arbeiter-Ersatzkassen, the Bundesknappschaft and the See-Krankenkasse, do not constitute undertakings or associations of undertakings within the meaning of Article 81 EC when they determine fixed maximum amounts corresponding to the upper limit of the price of medicinal products whose cost is borne by sickness funds.

---

(1)  OJ C 303 of 27.10.2001, and OJ L 348 of 08.12.2001.

1

---
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 23, 

2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00003-CV

WENXIN XIA, Appellant

V.

GARTH ROLLBROOK, LLC AND RAYMOND FLOYD, Appellees

On Appeal from the 165th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-68652

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 9, 2023. On March 22, 

2024, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1(a)(1). The motion is granted. 

We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Spain, and Hassan.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 68 (Monday, April 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21155-21156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8415]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Return Processing 
Delays Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Return 
Processing Delays Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, May 31, 2012 and Friday, June 
1, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6098.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Return Processing 
Delays Project Committee will be held Thursday, May 31, 2012, at 8 a.m. 
to 4:30 p.m. and Friday, June 1st from 8 a.m. to 12:00 noon Pacific 
Time at TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174. The 
public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements 
for consideration. Notifications of intent to participate must be made 
with Ms. Janice Spinks. For more information please contact Ms. Spinks 
at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, 
MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.


[[Page 21156]]


    Dated: March 28, 2012.
Louis Morizio,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2012-8415 Filed 4-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN HO, an individual,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

NICK FLOUTSIS, in his individual capacity

and as trustee of the Floutsis Family Trust;

ANGIE FLOUTIS, in her individual capacity

and as trustee of the Floutsis Family Trust,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 20

- 56017

D.C. No.

8:20

- cv

- 00472

- JLS

- JDE

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 10, 2022 * *

Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH, BADE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff John Ho appeals the district court’s order declining to exercise

supplemental jurisdiction over his California Unruh Civil Rights Act claim under 28

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 13 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

U.S.C. § 1367(c)(4) . We lack jurisdiction to address the merits of this appeal and

dis miss the case on those grounds.

Even when not briefed by the parties, “ this court has an independent

obligation to address sua sponte whether we have subject matter jurisdiction

. ”

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Hughes , 358 F.3d 1089, 1093 (9th Cir. 2004)

. This court lacks

jurisdiction over the immediate appeal because Ho filed a notice of voluntary

dismissal without prejudice before later attempting to file another voluntary

dismissal with prejudice. The first dismissal is operative and deprives this cou rt of

jurisdiction.

First, a “voluntary dismissal without prejudice is ordinarily not a final

judgment from which the plaintiff may appeal.” Concha v. London , 62 F.3d 1493,

1507 (9th Cir. 1995). No exception to the general rule is present here, which means

Ho is incorrect to assert that this court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291

.

Second, Ho’s voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) “automatically terminates the action, and thus federal

jurisdiction, without judicial involvement.” Com. Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co

. ,

193 F.3d 1074, 1076 (9th Cir. 1999). “The action is terminated at that point, as if

no action had ever been filed.” Id. at 1080. The second notice of dismissal , which

Ho claims vests our court with jurisdiction, therefore had no effect and is not

appealable. See 9 Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller

, Federal Practice a nd3

Procedure § 2367 (4th ed. 2022) (“After the filing of a dismissal, the action no

longer is pending, and generally no further proceedings in the action are proper.”).

Ho’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
Exhibit 4.1


 





Alaia Capital, LLC


62 West 45th St.


5th Floor


New York, NY 10036


 


June 1, 2022


 
m+ Buffer 15 Fund, m+ funds Trust, Series 1-27




 


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


240 Greenwich Street, 22W Floor


New York, New York 10286


 


		Re:	m+ funds Trust, Series 1-27 (the “Trust”)



 


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 
We
have examined Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (File No. 333-264080) for the above captioned Trust. We hereby consent to
the use in the Registration Statement of the references to Alaia Capital, LLC as evaluator.




 


You are hereby authorized to file a copy of this
letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


 


 


	 	Very truly yours,	 
	 	 	 
	 	Alaia Capital, LLC	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Ian Shainbrown	 
	 	 	Name: Ian Shainbrown	 
	 	 	Title:  Executive Vice President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

ALAN SCOTT GREGORY

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 2136 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 

Board File No. C1-15-107 

(District of Columbia Court of Appeals, No. 

13-BS-608) 

Attorney Registration No. 46214 

(Out of State) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM: 

 AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2015, Alan Scott Gregory having been 

disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia by Order of the District of 

Columbia Court of Appeals filed January 8, 2015; the said Alan Scott Gregory having 

been directed on February 19, 2015, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the 

imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be 

unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is 

 ORDERED that Alan Scott Gregory is disbarred from the practice of law in 

this Commonwealth and he shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
FalconTarget, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended March31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

FalconTarget, Inc.

Date: June 23, 2009

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan

Serge Atlan

Chairman

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Laqueta Monique Crawford, Appellant

No. 06-12-00159-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 7th District Court of 

Smith County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 007-

2778-06). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief 

Justice Morriss and Justice Carter 

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellant to 

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that appellant, Laqueta Monique Crawford, has adequately indicated her

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 12, 2012

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra Autrey, Clerk
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                STATEMENTS RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                ------------------------------------------------
                (In Thousands, Except Per Share Data, Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Three Months Ended            Nine Months Ended
                                                        March 31, 2007                March 31, 2007
                                                      ------------------         -------------------------

<S>                                                   <C>                          <C>
Income available to common stockholders                 $        242                 $       1,715

Weighted average shares outstanding                           69,012                        69,343

Basic earnings per share                                $       0.00                 $        0.02

Income for diluted earnings per share                   $        242                 $       1,715

Total weighted average common shares and equivalents
outstanding for diluted computation                           69,293                        69,664

Diluted earnings per share                              $       0.00                 $        0.02
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

## Board Votes To Close March 30, 2012, Meeting

By telephone vote on March 30, 2012, members of the Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service met and voted unanimously to close to public observation its meeting held in Washington, DC, via teleconference. The Board determined that no earlier public notice was possible.

# ITEMS CONSIDERED:

1. Strategic Issues.

2. Financial Matters.

# GENERAL COUNSEL CERTIFICATION:

The General Counsel of the United States Postal Service has certified that the meeting was properly closed under the Government in the Sunshine Act.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Requests for information about the meeting should be addressed to the Secretary of the Board, Julie S. Moore, at (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-8868 Filed 4-9-12; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
08-15-00100-CV

ACCEPTED

08-15-00100-CV

EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS

EL PASO, TEXAS

4/7/2015 8:46:37 AM

DENISE PACHECO

CLERK

 FILED IN 8th COURT OF APPEALS EL PASO, TEXAS 4/7/2015 8:46:37 AM DENISE PACHECO Clerk ------------------------ VOID LF ------------------------ FILED IN 8th COURT OF APPEALS EL PASO, TEXAS 4/7/2015 10:31:00 AM DENISE PACHECO Clerk
1/20/16

TO: FAA

RE: Request Amendments for 333 Exemption #14292

Klein creative Media Regulatory docket No FAA-2015-4862

To whom it may concern at the FAA,

After reviewing the information in my exemption, I am writing to request some 

additional amendments that I forgot in my letter dated 1/19/16. In another document 

labeled, “Letter to FAA John S. Duncan” I requested two amendments and sent 

supporting documents to request 1.) Additional UAS models to be approved, and 2.) 

Closed Set for Motion Picture and Film approval. 

In this separate addendum, I am requesting amendments in the following limitations: 

#13 this part limits operation to that of just the PIC. I would like to request that since I 

am a certified PIC, that I may also hire a non-certified pilots to act as UAS operator and I 

would be responsible, and oversee the individual is acting in accordance with the FAA 

safe flight rules as stated in my exemption. 

#26 on my exemption states that the UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any

moving device or vehicle. I would like to request to amend this so I can film both on the 

land and on the water from a moving vehicle (ie, boat, golf cart, etc.)

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely,

Marci Klein

Klein Creative Media

1620 Spreckels Lane

Redondo Beach, CA 90278

(310)990-4120
OFFICE OF 

APPELLATE COURTS 

AUG 2 8 2014 

STATE OF MINNESOTA 

IN SUPREME COURT FILED 

A14-0435 

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against 

Bruce Anthony Kunz, a Minnesota Attorney, 

Registration No. 225289. 

ORDER 

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a 

petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Bruce Anthony Kunz committed 

professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely: (1) entering into business 

transactions with clients without the required written disclosures and without obtaining 

their written, informed consent to the essential terms of the transactions and respondent's 

role in them, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.8(a); (2) representing clients 

despite a conflict of interest that existed because of the business transactions respondent 

had entered into with these clients, including representing one such client in a bankruptcy 

proceeding, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.7(a)(2) and 8.4(d); and (3) failing to 

disclose a client's interest in and income from one of respondent's business transactions 

with the client to a bankruptcy court and bankruptcy trustee, in violation of Minn. R. 

Prof. Conduct 3.3(a), 4.1, and 8.4(c). 

Respondent unconditionally admits the allegations in the petition, withdraws his 

previously filed answer, and waives his rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers 

Professional Responsibility (RLPR). In a stipulation, respondent and the Director jointly 

recommend that the appropriate discipline is suspension from the practice of law for a 

1 
minimum of 4 months, with the right to file a petition for reinstatement not more than 60 

days before the expiration of the suspension period. 

This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly 

recommended disposition. 

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Respondent Bruce Anthony Kunz is suspended from the practice of law for 

a minimum of 4 months, effective 14 days from the date of the filing of this order, with 

leave to file a petition for reinstatement not more than 60 days before the expiration of 

the minimum suspension period; 

2. Respondent may petition for reinstatement pursuant to Rule 18(a)-(d), 

RLPR. Reinstatement is conditioned on successful completion of the professional 

responsibility portion of the state bar examination, and satisfaction of continuing legal 

education requirements pursuant to Rule 18(e), RLPR; and 

3. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of 

suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals), and shall pay $900 in costs 

pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR. 

Dated: August 28, 2014 

BY THE COURT: 

kit ,•id?— 

Alan C. Page 

Associate Justice 

2
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 125 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of H.R. 1830, the 

3 Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the fol4 lowing correction: Strike ‘‘National Purple Heart Hall of 
2 

•HCON 125 EH 

1 Honor, Inc.’’ each place such term appears and insert 

2 ‘‘National Purple Heart Honor Mission, Inc.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 2, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 125 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives 

1830. to make a correction in the enrollment of H.R.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Request Extension of 333 Exemption #11064A
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

(AHCCCS LOGO)

           ARIZONA HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION
                        DIVISION OF BUSINESS AND FINANCE
                          SECTION A. CONTRACT AMENDMENT

<TABLE>
<S>                 <C>                <C>                               <C>
1. AMENDMENT NO.:   2. CONTRACT NO.:   3. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENT:   4. PROGRAM:
       11             YH04-0001-03            SEPTEMBER 1, 2005              DHCM
</TABLE>

5. CONTRACTOR/PROVIDER NAME AND ADDRESS:

                              HEALTH CHOICE ARIZONA
                           1600 W. BROADWAY, SUITE 260
                            TEMPE, ARIZONA 85282-1136

6. PURPOSE;

     To add language to clarify Credit Balance Review Project requirements first
     presented in Amendment #7.

7. The above referenced contract is hereby amended as follows:

     A.   Add the following language to the Credit Balance Review Project
          language presented in Amendment #7:

          "D.  If the health plan/program contractor receives credit balance
               recovery funds from AHCCCS and at a later date recoups funds from
               the provider for the same service, the health plan/program
               contractor must repay the provider the lesser of the amount
               recouped or the credit balance recovery within 20 business days
               of being provided the documentation of the double recoupment by
               AHCCCS. A provider may request a refund of a double recoupment
               resulting from the credit balance recovery project for a period
               of 1 year after the second recoupment/payment."

     B.   The Credit Balance Review Project term will run concurrent with the
          remainder of this contract, not to exceed March 4, 2008.

NOTE: Please sign and date both and return one original to:
                              Gary L Callahan, Contract Management Supervisor
                              AHCCCS Contracts and Purchasing
                              701 E, Jefferson, MD 5700
                              Phoenix, AZ 85034

8. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED FOR HEREIN, ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE ORIGINAL
CONTRACT NOT HERETOFORE CHANGED AND/OR AMENDED REMAIN UNCHANGED AND IN FULL
EFFECT.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE PARTIES HERETO SIGN THEIR NAMES IN AGREEMENT.

9. NAME OF CONTRACTOR:                  10. ARIZONA HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT
   HEALTH CHOICE ARIZONA                    SYSTEM

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORISED INDIVIDUAL:     SINGNATURE:


/s/ CAROLYN ROSE                        /s/ MICHAEL VEIT
-------------------------------------   ----------------------------------------
TYPED NAME: CAROLYN ROSE                TYPED NAME: MICHAEL VEIT
TITLE: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER          TITLE: CONTRACTS AND PURCHASING
                                               ADMINISTRATOR

DATE: 9/6/2005                          DATE: AUG 24 2005
-83 -82 -81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76

 37

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲ ▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

05/26

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL