alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004094EN.01004002.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/40

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

12 February 2004

in Case T-282/01: Aslantrans AG v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Customs duties - Repayment of import duties - Shipment of cigarettes stolen during transport - Notion of special situation within the meaning of Article 905 of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 - Compliance with the time-limit)

(2004/C 94/116)

Language of the case: German

In Case T-282/01, Aslantrans AG, established in Rickenbach bei Wil (Switzerland), represented by J. Weigell, avocat, v Commission of the European Communities (Agents: initially by R. Tricot and S. Fries, and subsequently by X. Lewis and S. Fries): Application for annulment of Commission Decision REM 19/00 of 18 July 2001 refusing to grant an application by the Federal Republic of Germany for repayment of import duties in favour of the applicant, the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of: P. Lindh, President, and R. García-Valdecasas and J.D. Cooke, Judges I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 12 February 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 44 of 16.02.2003.

1

---
# C_2004094EN.01001503.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/15

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 11 December 2003

in Case C-408/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de Cassation): Criminal proceedings against José Antonio da Silva Carvalho (1)

1

(Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Directive 91/439/EEC - Mutual recognition of driving licences - Residence condition - Obtaining of a driving licence in a Member State other than the one in which the holder of that licence resides)

(2004/C 94/31)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-408/02: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Cour de Cassation (Luxembourg) for a preliminary ruling in the criminal proceedings pending before that court against José Antonio da Silva Carvalho on the interpretation of Article 1(2) and (3) of Council Directive 91/439/EEC of 29 July 1991 on driving licences, the Court (Third Chamber), composed of A. Rosas (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, R. Schintgen and N. Colneric, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate-General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave an order on 11 December 2003, the operative part of which is as follows:

The combined provisions of Articles 1(2), 7(1)(b) and 9 of Council Directive 91/439/EEC of 29 July 1991 on driving licences, as amended by Council Directive 97/26/EC of 2 June 1997, must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from refusing recognition to a driving licence issued by another Member State on the ground that, according to the information available to the first Member State, the holder of the licence in question had, at the date of its issue, established his normal residence in the territory of that Member State and not in the territory of the issuing Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 7, 11.1.2003.

1

---
# EC 

# ED
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

## FEB 02 2015 

## HEARING DOCKET
INTHE MATTER OF: DOCKETNO. FAA-2014-0866 MISSISSIPPI AIR EXPRESS, LLC FAACASENO. 2013S0950114 Respondent Judge J.E. Sullivan

JOINTLY PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON THERESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS Pmsuant to the Order Directing Parties to Confer and File an Agreed Briefing Schedule on the Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, parties have conferred and agreed upon the following briefing schedule: 1. The Respondentwill file his Motion to Dismiss on orbefore February 20, 2015. 2. The Agency will file its Response to the Respondent's Motion to Dismiss on or before March 13, 2015. 3. The Respondent will file its Reply to the Response to the Respondent's Motion to Dismiss on orbeforeMarch 24,2015. 4. Parties do not anticipate oral arguments necessary on the Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. However, ifnecessary, the parties are available on the following dates: April 8, 2015, Apri19, 2015, and April15, 2015.

# .. • 

### " • Respectively submitted this

# 30day ofJanuary, 2015.

Counsel for Complainant

.

**..--~**

\**~** 

### , • 

### • ' 

### , 

## , ,, 

## , • 

### • CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing Jointly Proposed Briefing Schedule on the Respondent's Motion to Dismiss was sent as follows: original and one copy via regular mail and Federal Express to: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur WrightBuilding- Suite 2Wl000 one copyviafacsimile and Federal Express to: The Honorable J.E. Sullivan Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20, Room E12-320 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE· East Building Ground Floor Washington, DC 20590 facsimile: (202) 366-7536 one copy via certified mail

### to: Wayne E. Ferrell, Jr. Law Offices ofWayne E. Ferrell, Jr. P.O. Box 2448 405 Tombigbee St. Jackson, MS 39228 Lega Office ofthe Regional Counsel 

## /;JAN 

# 30 

# l015. Dated 

### , •
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 728 

Amending rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate to limit debate 

on motions to proceed. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 13, 2018 

Mr. MERKLEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules and Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Amending rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate 

to limit debate on motions to proceed. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. LIMITING DEBATE ON MOTIONS TO PROCEED 

3 UNDER RULE XXII. 

4 Rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate is 

5 amended by— 

6 (1) redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as 

7 paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and 

8 (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the fol9 lowing: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 728 IS 

1 ‘‘2. Other than a motion made during the first 

2 2 hours of a new legislative day, as described in 

3 paragraph 2 of rule VIII, consideration of a motion 

4 to proceed to the consideration of any debatable 

5 matter, including consideration of any debatable mo6 tion or appeal in connection therewith, shall be lim7 ited to not more than 2 hours, to be divided equally 

8 between the majority and the minority. This para9 graph shall not apply to motions considered non10 debatable by the Senate pursuant to rule or prece11 dent.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 3.1

Delaware

PAGE 1

The First State

I,
HARRIET SMITH WINDSOR, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF RELATIONSERVE MEDIA, INC. , CHANGING ITS NAME FROM RELATIONSERVE
MEDIA, INC.  TO SENDTEC, INC. , FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY, A.D. 2006, AT 12:56 OCLOCK P.M.

A FILED COPY OF THIS CERTIFICATE HAS BEEN FORWARDED TO THE KENT COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS.







|                               |  |      |                                           |     
|------------------------------ |  | ---- | ----------------------------------------- | ----
|                               |  |     
|                               |  | LOGO |                                           | LOGO
|                               |  |      | Harriet Smith Windsor, Secretary of State
|3946943         8100 060672831 |  |      | AUTHENTICATION:
4904375 DATE: 07-17-06   



---

|                                                                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|State of Delaware Secretary of State Division of Corporations Delivered 12:56 PM 07/17/2006 FILED
12:56 PM 07/17/2006 SRV 060672831 - 3946943 FILE

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

OF THE

AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

RELATIONSERVE MEDIA, INC.

Under Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law

It is hereby certified that:

1 The name of
the corporation is RelationServe Media, Inc

2 The Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended by amending and
restating Article FIRST thereof as follows:

FIRST: The name of this corporation is SendTec, Inc

3 The amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation herein certified has been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware pursuant to a resolution adopted by the Corporations Board and by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the capital stock of the Corporation at a meeting duly noticed and conducted in
accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and the By-Laws of the Corporation.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said
RelationServe Media, Inc. has caused this Certificate to be signed by Paul Soltoff, its Chief Executive Officer, and attested by Donald Gould, its Secretary this 17thday of July, 2006



RELATIONSERVE MEDIA, INCBy:

/s/ Paul SoltoffName:

Paul SoltoffTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




|        |  |                 
|------- |  | ----------------
|ATTEST:
|        | 
|By:     |  | /s/ Donald Gould
|Name:   |  | Donald Gould    
|Title:  |  | Secretary
Impurity and CAS Registry Number

(a)

Maximum

percent

(b)

Confidential

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

CBI

CBI

CBI

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

CBI

TS-H201PP Attachment 4

 Page 1/1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SendTec, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Soltoff, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Paul Soltoff             
|Paul Soltoff                 
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)
|November 16, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 72 (Friday, April 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 22326]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8886]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Initial Review

    The meeting announced below concerns Extension of the World Trade 
Center Health Registry (U50) Request for Applications (RFA), OH12-001, 
initial review.
    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Time and Date: 1 p.m.-2 p.m., May 16, 2012 (Closed).
    Place: National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health 
(NIOSH), 2400 Century Parkway, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30345, 
Telephone: (866) 918-5441.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in 
response to ``Extension of the World Trade Center Health Registry 
(U50) RFA OH12-001''
    Contact Person for More Information: George Bockosh, M.S., 
Scientific Review Officer, CDC/NIOSH, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, 
Mailstop P-05, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15236, Telephone: (412) 386-
6465 AND Joan Karr, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, CDC/NIOSH 1600 
Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E-74, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone: 
(404) 498-2506.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: April 5, 2012.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012-8886 Filed 4-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Chaojun Wang, the Chief Executive Officer of
LONGHAI STEEL INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
statement this 2nd day of November 2010.

/s/Chaojun WangChaojun
WangChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Longhai Steel Inc. and will be retained by Longhai
Steel Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 29, 2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00723-CV

HAROLD K. GAUSE, Appellant 

V.

TRIUMPH HOSPITAL OF NORTH HOUSTON, L.P. D/B/A KINDRED 

HOSPITAL SPRING & UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES, ET AL., Appellees 

On Appeal from the 113th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-14362 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an attempted appeal from an order signed July 27, 2018, that does not 

dispose of all the parties. Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. 

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not 

dispose of all pending parties and claims, the orders remain interlocutory and 
2 

unappealable until final judgment is rendered unless a statutory exception applies. 

Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. 

Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). 

Appellant argues that this interlocutory appeal is authorized by statute because the 

trial court signed an order granting a motion to dismiss by certain defendants based 

on governmental immunity. We disagree because the record shows the trial court’s 

order of partial dismissal granted these defendants’ motion to dismiss under Tex. R. 

Civ. P. 91a. There is no statute authorizing an interlocutory appeal from such an 

order. 

On September 6, 2018 notification was transmitted to the parties of this 

court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed 

a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal on or before September 

17, 2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). No response was filed. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Busby, Brown, and Wise.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

CLIFFORD GILLIE

VERSUS

KEVIN GILLIE

NO. 2020 CW 0046

MAR 0 4 2022

In Re: Kevin J. Gillie, applying for supervisory writs, 19th

Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 

No. 686006. 

BEFORE: McDONALD, THERIOT, AND CHUTZ, JJ. 

WRIT DISMISSED AS MOOT. Pursuant to the minutes of the

district court provided to this court, it appears the writ

application is moot, and therefore, this writ is dismissed. 

JMM

MRT

WRC

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

r 

C'' 

D UTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 1518

THERESA M. YOUNG , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Defendant

- Appellee , and
MARY SEYMOUR , Defendant

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Deborah K. Chasanow , Senior District Judge. ( 8:22

- cv - 00241

- DKC )

Submitted : August 24, 2023 Decided: August 28, 2023

Before QUATTLEBAUM and HEYTENS , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Theresa M. Young, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1518 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Theresa M. Young appeals the district court’s orders disposing of several motions, including Defendant’s motion to dismiss Young’s claims for libel, defamation, and slander , which the district court granted, and denying Young’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Young’s informal brief fails to meaningfully c hallenge the district court’s rationale for dismissing her claims, Young has forfeited appellate review of the court’s disposi tion

. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”)

. To the extent Young challenges the district court’s refusal to appoint her counsel, we discern no abuse of discretion i n this ruling

. Finally, to the extent Young seeks to raise new claims for the first time on appeal, she may not do so. Brown v. Am. Broad. Co. , 704 F.2d 1296, 1303 (4th Cir. 1983). We therefore affirm the district
court’s orders. Young v. U nited States , No. 8:22

- cv - 00241

- DKC (D. Md. Mar. 16, 2023; Apr. 6, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-1518 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
FalconTarget, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the
fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

FalconTarget, Inc.

Date: June 21, 2009

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan

Serge Atlan

Chairman

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
ACCEPTED01-14-01015-CVFIRST COURT OF APPEALSHOUSTON, TEXAS4/7/2015 2:20:59 PMCHRISTOPHER PRINECLERK
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
FalconTarget, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

FalconTarget, Inc.

Date: June 23, 2009

By:   /s/   Thomas Kirchner

Thomas Kirchner

Chief Executive Officer, Principal
Financial Officer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 10.3  








Sastaro Limited

22 Arch Makarios III Avenue 

Nicosia 1517 Cypress 





June 29, 2005 




Buttes Gas & Oil Co International Inc.

Crescent Tower

Al Buhairah Comiche

PO Box 211

Sharjah UAE 




Re:     Participation Agreement dated
19th May 2005 ("Agreement") 



Dear Sir 



This letter is further to our
telephone conversation and will amend the terms of the Agreement. 



Clause 3(2)(b) is hereby amended by
deleting US$5.0 and replacing it with US$2.5 and a new clause 3(2)(b)(i) is added
immediately following that states “US$ 2.5 million on 15 July 2005" 



In the event that payments are not
made on the above due dates then the right to terminate the Agreement will arise
forthwith. 



In all other respects the Agreement
is confirmed to be in full force and effect. 



Yours truly 



Sastaro Limited 



/s/ Brent Kinney

Brent Kinney

Director 






Agreed and Accepted this
29th day 

of June 2005 





Buttes Gas & Oil Co
International Inc. 



/s/ P.L. Keithley

P.L. Keithley

President