22668 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 17, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 240–276– 

8341, email: 

cindy.burnsteel@fda.hhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Novartis 

Animal Health U.S., Inc. (Novartis), 

3200 Northline Ave., suite 300, 

Greensboro, NC 27408, has requested 

that FDA withdraw approval of those 

parts of NADA 139–472 for DENAGARD 

(tiamulin) Type A medicated article 

pertaining to the production indications 

for use of increased rate of weight gain 

and improved feed efficiency in swine. 

Novartis requested voluntary 

withdrawal of approval of these 

indications for use because the product 

is no longer marketed for these uses. 

Revised product labeling reflecting the 

withdrawal of these indications has 

been approved in a supplement to 

NADA 139–472. 

Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal 

Register, FDA gave notice that the 

approval of those parts of NADA 139– 

472 pertaining to the production 

indications for use of increased rate of 

weight gain and improved feed 

efficiency in swine is withdrawn, 

effective April 17, 2012. As provided for 

in the regulatory text of this document, 

the animal drug regulations are 

amended to reflect this withdrawal of 

approval. 

With the withdrawal of approval of 

the production indications for tiamulin, 

the lowest concentration of the drug in 

feed now has a preslaughter withdrawal 

period. In accordance with 21 CFR 

558.3(b)(1)(ii), tiamulin is now a 

Category II drug, and the table in 21 CFR 

558.4(d) is revised to reflect that change. 

However, the maximum concentration 

of tiamulin in Type B feeds is not being 

increased from the current 3.5 grams per 

pound (g/lb) because there is an 

approved 5-g/lb Type A medicated 

article. 

This rule does not meet the definition 

of ‘‘rule’’ in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because 

it is a rule of ‘‘particular applicability.’’ 

Therefore, it is not subject to the 

congressional review requirements in 5 

U.S.C. 801–808. 

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 558 

Animal drugs, Animal feeds. 

Therefore, under the Federal Food, 

Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 

authority delegated to the Commissioner 

of Food and Drugs and redelegated to 

the Director of the Center for Veterinary 

Medicine, 21 CFR part 558 is amended 

as follows: 

PART 558—NEW ANIMAL DRUGS FOR 

USE IN ANIMAL FEEDS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 21 CFR 

part 558 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b, 371. 

■ 2. In paragraph (d) of § 558.4, in the 

‘‘Category I’’ table, remove the entry for 

‘‘Tiamulin’’; and in the ‘‘Category II’’ 

table, alphabetically add a new entry for 

‘‘Tiamulin’’ to read as follows: 

§ 558.4 Requirement of a medicated feed 

mill license. 

* * * * * 

(d) * * * 

CATEGORY II 

Drug Assay limits percent 1

Type A 

Type B maximum 

(100x) 

Assay limits 

percent 1

Type B/C 2

*******

Tiamulin .................................................... 113.4 g/lb, 100–108 ................................ 3.5 g/lb (0.8%) ......................................... 90–115 

5 and 10 g/lb, 90–115 ............................. 70–130 

* * * * * * * 

1Percent of labeled amount. 

2Values given represent ranges for either Type B or Type C medicated feeds. For those drugs that have two range limits, the first set is for a 

Type B medicated feed and the second set is for a Type C medicated feed. These values (ranges) have been assigned in order to provide for 

the possibility of dilution of a Type B medicated feed with lower assay limits to make Type C medicated feed. 

* * * * * 

§ 558.600 [Amended] 

■ 3. In § 558.600, in the table, remove 

and reserve paragraph (e)(1)(i). 

Dated: March 21, 2012. 

Bernadette Dunham, 

Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9196 Filed 4–16–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

22 CFR Parts 120 and 123 

RIN 1400–AC85 

[Public Notice: 7846] 

Amendment to the International Traffic 

in Arms Regulations: International 

Import Certificate BIS–645P/ATF–4522/ 

DSP–53 and Administrative Changes 

AGENCY: Department of State. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Department of State is 

amending the International Traffic in 

Arms Regulations (ITAR) to remove 

reference to the International Import 

Certificate (Form BIS–645P/ATF–4522/ 

DSP–53). This amendment ceases the 

Department’s practice of accepting DSP– 

53 submissions. Instead, the DSP–61 is 

to be used by importers when necessary. 

The Department also is making 

administrative changes to other 

sections. 

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is 

effective May 17, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Candace M. J. Goforth, Acting Director, 

Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy, 

Department of State, telephone (202) 

663–2792, email 

DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov. ATTN: 

International Import Certificate, ITAR 

Section 123.4. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Arms 

Export Control Act authorizes the 

President to control the import and 

export of defense articles. Executive 

Order 11958, as amended, delegated the 

authority to regulate permanent and 

temporary exports and temporary 

imports of defense articles to the 

Secretary of State, and delegated the 

authority to regulate permanent imports 

of defense articles to the Attorney 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 17, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 22669 

General. The International Import 

Certificate Form BIS–645P/ATF–4522/ 

DSP–53 is identified as a form issued by 

the Department of Commerce’s Bureau 

of Industry & Security (BIS); the 

Department of Justice’s Bureau of 

Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and 

Explosives (BATFE); and the 

Department of State’s Directorate of 

Defense Trade Controls (DDTC). It is 

meant to standardize procedures used to 

facilitate international trade. 

DDTC receives a few hundred DSP–53 

submissions a year, and typically they 

are submitted by persons claiming the 

temporary import licensing exemption 

available at § 123.4, but who need 

documentation of U.S. Government 

approval of the temporary import. The 

Department of State’s DSP–61 

(Application/License for Temporary 

Import of Unclassified Defense Articles) 

is the primary means by which the 

Department exercises its authority to 

control the temporary import of defense 

articles. Therefore, DDTC revises § 123.4 

to implement its decision to no longer 

accept submissions of the International 

Import Certificate (DSP–53). For 

temporary imports of defense articles 

meeting the conditions of the exemption 

at § 123.4, but for which the foreign 

exporter requires documentation, the 

U.S. importer will be required to obtain 

a DSP–61. BATFE and BIS will continue 

to adjudicate International Import 

Certificate submissions for items under 

their jurisdiction. DDTC also revises 

§ 123.3 to specify that a DSP–61 is 

accepted to support the use of a 

temporary import exemption but not in 

satisfaction of requirements for a 

permanent import. And § 120.28(b)(1) is 

amended to remove reference to the 

DSP–53. 

Section 120.31 is amended to update 

the list of NATO countries by adding 

Albania and Croatia. Section 123.1(c)(4) 

is amended to replace reference to an 

obsolete form (‘‘Department of Defense 

Form 1513’’) with reference to the 

proper documentation (‘‘Letter of Offer 

and Acceptance’’). Section 123.4(c)(1) is 

amended to provide a correct reference 

(§ 120.1(c) rather than § 120.1(b)). 

Section 123.4(c)(2) is amended to 

provide updated terminology 

(‘‘Electronic Export Information’’ 

replaces ‘‘Shipper’s Export 

Declaration’’). Section 123.4(c)(3) is 

amended to provide updated 

terminology (proscribed ‘‘area’’ and 

‘‘person,’’ in addition to ‘‘proscribed 

country’’). And § 123.25(b) is amended 

by removing the word ‘‘that’’ in the 

statement before the colon. 

The Department of State’s intention to 

discontinue accepting submissions of 

the DSP–53 was first published as a 

proposed rule on July 14, 2011, 

soliciting public comment (76 FR 

41438). The comment period ended 

August 29, 2011. Three parties filed 

comments. The Department’s evaluation 

of the written comments and 

recommendations follows. 

Three commenting parties noted that 

many foreign governments view the 

International Import Certificate as a 

means of providing not only 

certification by the U.S. Government of 

proposed imports, but also of providing 

end-use assurances in a manner similar 

to the Department’s form DSP–83 

(Nontransfer and Use Certificate). 

Similarly, one commenting party 

suggested the Department should 

provide U.S. exporters with an 

explanatory notice that can be presented 

to foreign officials that request an 

International Import Certificate 

subsequent to this rulemaking. The 

intent of the International Import 

Certificate is not to provide end-use 

assurances; it is intended to provide 

U.S. government acknowledgment of a 

proposed import. For items under their 

import jurisdiction, BIS and BATFE will 

continue to adjudicate International 

Import Certificate submissions, and 

therefore will continue to provide 

applicants documentation regarding 

U.S. government acknowledgment of 

proposed imports. For items under 

Department of State import jurisdiction, 

an approved DSP–61 serves as U.S. 

government acknowledgement and 

approval of a proposed temporary 

import. 

Three commenting parties expressed 

concern that the Department’s proposal 

to cease issuing International Import 

Certificates could inadvertently disrupt 

international trade. Two of the 

commenting parties recommended the 

Department coordinate with the 

international community to ensure 

alternative means of assurances are 

acceptable. The Department accepts this 

recommendation and notes that it has 

previously expressed the intent to 

discontinue the DSP–53 with the 

international community at various 

international conferences and at the 

Wassenaar Arrangement. In these 

forums, no concerns were expressed to 

the Department. 

One commenting party stated that the 

requirement to obtain a DSP–61, if 

documentation is required by a foreign 

exporter, will lead to cumbersome and 

unnecessary licensing reviews. The 

Department acknowledges that in a 

relatively small number of cases, license 

review will occur when with use of the 

DSP–53 it would have been avoided. 

The Department notes that the DSP–61 

is the appropriate means by which a 

person may obtain documentation of 

U.S. Government approval for the 

temporary import of defense articles 

otherwise eligible for the license 

exemption at ITAR § 123.4. 

One commenting party requested 

guidance on the means by which it can 

fulfill a foreign exporter’s requirement 

for documentation of U.S. Government 

authorization for the permanent import 

of defense articles not listed on the U.S. 

Munitions Import List (‘‘USMIL,’’ a 

subset of the USML). BATFE has 

jurisdiction over the permanent import 

of defense articles, even when those 

defense articles are not listed on the 

USMIL. Therefore, an International 

Import Certificate may be submitted to 

BATFE in such instances. 

One commenting party recommended 

the removal of reference in the final rule 

to the form DSP–85 (Application/ 

License for Permanent/Temporary 

Export or Temporary Import of 

Classified Defense Articles and Related 

Classified Technical Data), noting 

§ 123.4 applies only to unclassified 

articles and that the ITAR is already 

clear that temporary imports of 

classified defense articles require use of 

the DSP–85. The Department accepted 

this recommendation. 

Regulatory Analysis and Notices 

Administrative Procedure Act 

The Department of State is of the 

opinion that controlling the import and 

export of defense articles and services is 

a foreign affairs function of the United 

States Government and that rules 

implementing this function are exempt 

from § 553 (Rulemaking) and § 554 

(Adjudications) of the Administrative 

Procedure Act. Although the 

Department is of the opinion that this 

rule is exempt from the rulemaking 

provisions of the APA, the Department 

published this rule with a 45-day 

provision for public comment and 

without prejudice to its determination 

that controlling the import and export of 

defense services is a foreign affairs 

function. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

Since the Department is of the 

opinion that this rule is exempt from the 

rulemaking provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553, 

it does not require analysis under the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 

This amendment does not involve a 

mandate that will result in the 

expenditure by State, local, and tribal 

governments, in the aggregate, or by the 

private sector, of $100 million or more 

in any year and it will not significantly 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
22670 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 17, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

or uniquely affect small governments. 

Therefore, no actions were deemed 

necessary under the provisions of the 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 

1995. 

Executive Order 13175 

The Department has determined that 

this rule will not have tribal 

implications, will not impose 

substantial direct compliance costs on 

Indian tribal governments, and will not 

preempt tribal law. Accordingly, 

Executive Order 13175 does not apply 

to this rule. 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 

This amendment has been found not 

to be a major rule within the meaning 

of the Small Business Regulatory 

Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. 

Executive Orders 12372 and 13132 

This amendment will not have 

substantial direct effects on the States, 

on the relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. Therefore, in 

accordance with Executive Order 13132, 

it is determined that this amendment 

does not have sufficient federalism 

implications to require consultations or 

warrant the preparation of a federalism 

summary impact statement. The 

regulations implementing Executive 

Order 12372 regarding 

intergovernmental consultation on 

Federal programs and activities do not 

apply to this amendment. 

Executive Order 12866 

The Department is of the opinion that 

controlling the import and export of 

defense articles and services is a foreign 

affairs function of the United States 

Government and that rules governing 

the conduct of this function are exempt 

from the requirements of Executive 

Order 12866. However, the Department 

has reviewed this rule to ensure its 

consistency with the regulatory 

philosophy and principles set forth in 

the Executive Order. 

Executive Order 13563 

The Department of State has 

considered this rule in light of 

Executive Order 13563, dated January 

18, 2011, and affirms that this regulation 

is consistent with the guidance therein. 

Executive Order 12988 

The Department of State has reviewed 

this amendment in light of sections 3(a) 

and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to 

eliminate ambiguity, minimize 

litigation, establish clear legal 

standards, and reduce burden. 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

By this rulemaking, the Department of 

State will discontinue accepting one 

form (DSP–53) for the certification of a 

proposed temporary import of defense 

articles, and require the submission of 

another form (DSP–61) when there is 

the requirement for documentation of 

U.S. Government approval of the 

temporary import of defense articles 

that otherwise would be eligible for an 

available license exemption. Therefore, 

while in a limited number of instances 

this rule will result in different 

reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, it does not impose any 

new reporting or recordkeeping 

requirements subject to the Paperwork 

Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35. 

List of Subjects in 22 CFR Parts 120 and 

123 

Arms and munitions, Exports. 

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth 

above, Title 22, Chapter I, Subchapter 

M, parts 120 and 123 are amended as 

follows: 

PART 120—PURPOSE AND 

DEFINITIONS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 120 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: Secs. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90– 

629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 

2797); 22 U.S.C. 2794; E.O. 11958, 42 FR 

4311; E.O. 13284, 68 FR 4075; 3 CFR, 1977 

Comp. p. 79; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; Pub. L. 105– 

261, 112 Stat. 1920. 

■ 2. Section 120.28 is amended by 

revising paragraph (b)(1), redesignating 

paragraph (b)(3) as paragraph (c), and 

revising newly redesignated paragraph 

(c) as follows: 

§ 120.28 Listing of forms referred to in this 

subchapter. 

* * * * * 

(b) Department of Commerce, Bureau 

of Industry and Security: 

(1) International Import Certificate 

(Form BIS–645P/ATF–4522). 

* * * * * 

(c) Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency: Letter of 

Offer and Acceptance. 

■ 3. Section 120.31 is amended by 

revising it to read as follows: 

§ 120.31 North Atlantic Treaty 

Organization. 

North Atlantic Treaty Organization 

(NATO) is comprised of the following 

member countries: Albania, Belgium, 

Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czech 

Republic, Denmark, Estonia, France, 

Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, 

Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, 

The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, 

Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, 

Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom, and 

the United States. 

PART 123—LICENSES FOR THE 

EXPORT OF DEFENSE ARTICLES 

■ 4. The authority citation for part 123 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: Secs. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90– 

629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 

2797); 22 U.S.C. 2753; E.O. 11958, 42 FR 

4311; 3 CFR, 1977 Comp. p. 79; 22 U.S.C. 

2651a; 22 U.S.C. 2776; Pub. L. 105–261, 112 

Stat. 1920; Sec. 1205(a), Pub. L. 107–228. 

■ 5. Section 123.1 is amended by 

revising paragraph (c)(4) to read as 

follows: 

§ 123.1 Requirement for export or 

temporary import licenses. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(4) An application for a license under 

this part for the permanent export of 

defense articles sold commercially must 

be accompanied by a copy of a purchase 

order, letter of intent, or other 

appropriate documentation. In cases 

involving the U.S. Foreign Military 

Sales program, three copies of the 

relevant Letter of Offer and Acceptance 

are required, unless the procedures of 

§ 126.4(c) or § 126.6 of this subchapter 

are followed. 

* * * * * 

■ 6. Section 123.3 is amended by adding 

paragraph (c), to read as follows: 

§ 123.3 Temporary import licenses. 

* * * * * 

(c) A DSP–61 license may be obtained 

by a U.S. importer in satisfaction of 

§ 123.4(c)(4) of this subchapter. If a 

foreign exporter requires documentation 

for a permanent import, the U.S. 

importer must contact the Department 

of Justice’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 

Firearms and Explosives for the 

appropriate documentation. A DSP–61 

will not be approved to support 

permanent import requirements. 

■ 7. Section 123.4 is amended by 

revising paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(3), 

and adding paragraph (c)(4), to read as 

follows: 

§ 123.4 Temporary import license 

exemptions. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(1) The importer must meet the 

eligibility requirements set forth in 

§ 120.1(c) of this subchapter; 

(2) At the time of export, the ultimate 

consignee named on the Electronic 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 17, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 22671 

Export Information (EEI) must be the 

same as the foreign consignee or enduser of record named at the time of 

import; 

(3) A stated in § 126.1 of this 

subchapter, the temporary import must 

not be from or on behalf of a proscribed 

country, area, or person listed in that 

section unless an exception has been 

granted in accordance with § 126.3 of 

this subchapter; and 

(4) The foreign exporter must not 

require documentation of U.S. 

Government approval of the temporary 

import. If the foreign exporter requires 

documentation for a temporary import 

that qualifies for an exemption under 

this subchapter, the U.S. importer will 

not be able to claim the exemption and 

is required to obtain a DSP–61 

Application/License for Temporary 

Import of Unclassified Defense Articles. 

* * * * * 

■ 8. Section 123.25 is amended by 

revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: 

§ 123.25 Amendments to licenses. 

* * * * * 

(b) The following types of 

amendments to a license will be 

considered: Addition of U.S. freight 

forwarder or U.S. consignor; change due 

to an obvious typographical error; 

change in source of commodity; and 

change of foreign intermediate 

consignee if that party is only 

transporting the equipment and will not 

process (e.g., integrate, modify) the 

equipment. For changes in U.S. dollar 

value see § 123.23. 

* * * * * 

Dated: April 6, 2012. 

Rose E. Gottemoeller, 

Acting Under Secretary, Arms Control and 

International Security, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9081 Filed 4–16–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–25–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

32 CFR Part 183 

[DOD–2009–OS–0039; RIN 0790–AI55] 

Defense Support to Special Events 

AGENCY: Department of Defense. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This rule establishes 

procedures and assigns responsibilities 

for Special Events, sets forth procedural 

guidance for the execution of Special 

Events support when requested by civil 

authorities or qualifying entities and 

approved by the appropriate DoD 

authority, or as directed by the 

President, within the United States, 

including the District of Columbia, the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the U.S. 

Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, 

the Commonwealth of the Northern 

Mariana Islands, and any other territory 

or possession of the United States or any 

political subdivision thereof and 

elsewhere if properly approved. 

DATES: This rule is effective May 17, 

2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Carol Corbin, 571–256–8319. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Department of Defense published a 

proposed rule on November 26, 2010 

(75 FR 72767–72771). One comment 

was received and addressed below: 

Comment: ‘‘This comment pertains to 

Page 72770, Section A(iiii)G reference to 

DOD support to the ‘‘National Boy Scout 

Jamboree’’. Recommend that DOD not 

support this event. The Boy Scouts of 

America are an organization that 

discriminates based on sex, sexual 

orientation, and religion. DOD support 

is contrary to policies of state 

governments and the federal 

government. Material support is against 

the general principle of separation of 

church and state and the important 

elements of the constitution of the 

United States. DOD support essentially 

demonstrates an ‘‘establishment of 

religion’’ and is contrary to antidiscrimination policys [sic].’’ 

Response: The Department of Defense 

has valid statutory authority, 10 U.S.C. 

2554, for providing support to the Boy 

Scout jamboree. 

Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory 

Planning and Review’’ and Executive 

Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation 

and Regulatory Review’’ 

It has been certified that 32 CFR Part 

183 does not: 

(1) Have an annual effect on the 

economy of $100 million or more or 

adversely affect in a material way the 

economy, a section of the economy, 

productivity, competition, jobs, the 

environment, public health or safety, or 

State, local, or tribal governments or 

communities; 

(2) Create a serious inconsistency or 

otherwise interfere with an action taken 

or planned by another agency; 

(3) Materially alter the budgetary 

impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, 

or loan programs, or the rights and 

obligations of recipients thereof; or 

(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues 

arising out of legal mandates, the 

President’s priorities, or the principles 

set forth in these Executive Orders. 

Sec. 202, Pub. L. 104–4, ‘‘Unfunded 

Mandates Reform Act’’ 

It has been certified that 32 CFR part 

183 does not contain a Federal mandate 

that may result in the expenditure by 

State, local, and tribal governments, in 

aggregate, or by the private sector, of 

$100 million or more in any one year. 

Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory 

Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) 

It has been certified that 32 CFR part 

183 is not subject to the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) 

because it would not, if promulgated, 

have a significant economic impact on 

a substantial number of small entities. 

This rule establishes procedures and 

assigns responsibilities within DoD for 

Special Events in support of civil and 

non-governmental entities; therefore, it 

is not expected that small entities will 

be affected because there will be no 

economically significant regulatory 

requirements placed upon them. 

Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork 

Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) 

It has been certified that 32 CFR part 

183 does not impose reporting or 

recordkeeping requirements under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’ 

It has been certified that 32 CFR part 

183 does not have federalism 

implications, as set forth in Executive 

Order 13132. This rule does not have 

substantial direct effects on: 

(1) The States; 

(2) The relationship between the 

national government and the States; or 

(3) The distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 183 

Armed forces, Special events. 

Accordingly, 32 CFR part 183 is 

added to subchapter I to read as follows: 

PART 183—DEFENSE SUPPORT OF 

SPECIAL EVENTS 

Sec. 

183.1 Purpose. 

183.2 Applicability and scope. 

183.3 Definitions. 

183.4 Policy. 

183.5 Responsibilities. 

183.6 Procedures. 

Authority: 2 U.S.C. 1966, 2 U.S.C. 1970, 10 

U.S.C. 372–374, 10 U.S.C. 377, 10 U.S.C. 

2012, 10 U.S.C. 2553–2555, 10 U.S.C. 2564, 

18 U.S.C. 1385, 18 U.S.C. 3056, 31 U.S.C. 

1535–1536, 32 U.S.C. 502, 32 U.S.C. 508, 

Pub. L. 94–524, and Section 5802 of Pub. L. 

104–208, as amended. 

§ 183.1. Purpose. 

This part: 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES