alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or                           ( print page 23483)                        the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 14, 2012.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice President), 1000 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:

                    1.                     *IBERIABANK Corporation,*                     Lafayette, Louisiana; to merge with Florida Gulf Bancorp and thereby indirectly acquire Florida Gulf Bank, both in Fort Myers, Florida.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 16, 2012.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2012-9452 Filed 4-18-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### Nicholas L. NOTARO, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

No. 4727.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

April 4, 1980.

*770David C. Backstrom, Deputy Public Defender, Fairbanks, Brian Shortell, Public Defender, Anchorage, for appellant.

Steven J. Call, Asst. Dist, Atty., Harry L. Davis, Dist. Atty., Fairbanks, Avrum M. Gross, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellee.

Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., and CON-NOR, BOOCHEVER, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On September 22, 1978, Nicholas Notaro was returning to his home in Healy after a brief hospitalization in Fairbanks. He was driving his car; his wife was the only passenger. On the drive, Vicki Notaro told her husband that she planned to leave him. He drove off the highway to an isolated gravel pit north of Nenana, where he shot her to death. He hid her body in some brush where it was discovered on October 15, 1978. When questioned, Notaro first indicated that his wife had left him to return to Montana and that he had subsequently seen her there. He later confessed to killing his wife.

He was initially charged with first degree murder, but pled guilty, prior to trial, to a charge of manslaughter. He appeals his sentence of fifteen years in prison.

Notaro lacks a prior criminal record and there are other favorable aspects to his background, but the crime was an extreme one within the class of manslaughter.1 In sentencing Notaro, the court emphasized the goals of reaffirmation of societal norms and deterrence of others from like conduct.2 The sentence was not excessive. Nonetheless, we are of the opinion that it should be modified to include a recommendation that Notaro be provided with psychological counseling.3 The sentence is affirmed as modified, and the case remanded for entry of a modified judgment.

1

. In extreme cases, one may be a worst offender for sentencing purposes because of the nature of the crime, despite having a relatively favorable background. See *Saganna v. State,*594 P.2d 69, 70 (Alaska 1979); *Wilson v. State,*582 P.2d 154, 156 (Alaska 1978); *Burleson v. State,*543 P.2d 1195, 1201 (Alaska 1975). *But see Chappel v. State,*592 P.2d 1218, 1221 n.5 (Alaska 1979).

2

. See *State v. Chaney,*477 P.2d 441, 444 (Alaska 1970).

3

.We reach this conclusion through our independent review of the record in this case. The record describes a 31-year old man with no criminal record who served in the military in Southeast Asia. He is characterized as moody and as repressive of his emotions. We believe the reformative and protective goals of sentencing, in the facts of this particular case, require close examination of the sources of Notaro’s sudden act of violence in order to minimize the possibility that Notaro will become a recidivist.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9357]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket T-2-2012]


Foreign-Trade Zone 59, Temporary/Interim Manufacturing Authority, 
Novartis Consumer Health, Inc., (Pharmaceutical Product Manufacturing); 
Notice of Approval

    On January 12, 2012, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade 
Zones (FTZ) Board filed an application submitted by the Lincoln Foreign 
Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of FTZ 59, requesting temporary/interim 
manufacturing (T/IM) authority, on behalf of Novartis Consumer Health, 
Inc., to manufacture pharmaceutical products under FTZ procedures 
within FTZ 59--Sites 3 and 4, in Lincoln, Nebraska.
    The application was processed in accordance with T/IM procedures, 
as authorized by FTZ Board Orders 1347 (69 FR 52857, 8/30/04) and 1480 
(71 FR 55422, 9/22/06), including notice in the Federal Register 
inviting public comment (77 FR 4758, 1/31/2012). The FTZ staff examiner 
reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for 
approval under T/IM procedures. Pursuant to the authority delegated to 
the FTZ Board Executive Secretary in the above-referenced Board Orders, 
the application is approved, effective this date, until March 27, 2014, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 
400.28.

    Dated: March 27, 2012.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9357 Filed 4-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**POLYPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.**

** **

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Polypore International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended April 3, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, LynnAmos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

** **
| Date:  May 6, 2010 | /s/ Lynn Amos                |
|------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                         | Lynn Amos                    |
| ** **                   | **Chief  Financial Officer** |

 

----
H. Con. Res. 81 Agreed to December 19, 2019

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1158, the Clerk 

of the House of Representatives shall make the following correction: 

Amend the long title so as to read: ‘‘Making consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020, and for other 

purposes.’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
Page 1 of 1

MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION READINESS GRANT (MPIRG) AWARDEES 

ENVIRONMENTAL ATTESTATION FORM

Agricultural Marketing Service

November 2021 

 

This document serves as an attestation form to ensure activities done with funds provided 

through the Meat and Poultry Inspection Readiness Grant (MPIRG) program comply with the 

National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) (Pub. L. 91-190, 83 Stat. 852, 42 USC § 4321 

et. seq.). Provisional awardees must attest to each of the following items. If unable to attest to 

any item, the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) will contact the awardee to discuss how to 

address the item or otherwise become compliant with NEPA. By initialing each item, the 

awardee attests the statement is true and complete to the best of the awardee’s knowledge. 

Required Information

Yes ___ No ___ Any rights-of-way (ROWs), including any formally classified lands such 

as parks, wilderness areas, state, or national forests, etc. will not be 

adversely impacted by the proposed activities.1

 

Yes ___ No ___ No project sites or activities will directly or indirectly affect any 

threatened, endangered, proposed or candidate species, or would adversely 

affect designated critical habitat, as described by the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service.

2

Yes ___ No ___ No wetlands are present on or near project sites.3

 

Yes ___ No ___ No project activities or facilities are located within a floodplain.4 

Yes ___ No ___ No activities or facilities are within the boundaries of a Coastal Zone 

Management Area (CZMA) and/or Coastal Barrier Resource Area 

(CBRA).5

X

Authorized Representative

1 For assistance in making this determination, see http://www.protectedlands.net/map/. 2 For assistance in making this determination, see https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/. 3 For assistance in making this determination, see 

https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/water/wetlands/boundaries/. 4 For assistance in making this determination, see https://msc.fema.gov/portal/home. 5 For assistance in making this determination, see https://coast.noaa.gov/czm/,
EX-10.2




 Exhibit 10.2 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO THE

 QUANTA SERVICES, INC. 

2019 OMNIBUS EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 

This Amendment No. 1 to the Quanta Services, Inc. 2019 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is made on behalf of
Quanta Services, Inc., the sponsor of the Plan, on May 27, 2022. 
 1. Section 5(a) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in
its entirety to read as follows: 
 “(a) Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 12 of the Plan, the Committee
is authorized to deliver pursuant to Awards under the Plan no more than the sum of (i) 7,000,000 Common Shares, plus (ii) such number of Common Shares, not to exceed 455,770, as remained available for awards under the Prior Plan as of
March 31, 2019, less one share for every one share granted under the Prior Plan after March 31, 2019 and prior to the Effective Date, plus (iii) any Shares underlying Awards under the Prior Plan that are forfeited, cancelled, expire
unexercised, or are settled in cash after March 31, 2019, plus (iv) 2,173,000 shares. All such shares hereunder shall be available for Awards of Incentive Stock Options. From and after the Effective Date, the Company will make no further awards
under the Prior Plan.” 
 2. A new Section 5(h) is hereby added to the Plan as follows: 

“(h) With respect to any Award pursuant to the Plan (other than Options and SARs), the Committee may also grant dividend
equivalent rights which shall entitle the Participant to an amount equal to all dividends and other distributions that are payable during the Restricted Period on a like number of Common Shares. For the avoidance of doubt, dividends with respect to
Restricted Stock and dividend equivalents, if any, with respect to all other Awards pursuant to the Plan, as applicable, will not be payable until the Restricted Period on the underlying Award has lapsed, and in the event the underlying Award is
forfeited, any dividends or dividend equivalents with respect to the underlying Award shall also be forfeited.” 
 3. Except as
specifically modified herein, all terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in effect. 
 *     *
    * 
 As approved by the Board of Directors of Quanta Services, Inc. on March 30, 2022. 

As approved by the stockholders of Quanta Services, Inc. on May 27, 2022.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FERNANDO ZUNIGA, AKA Fernando

Sanchez,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-72578

Agency No. A072-122-680

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 6, 2015** 

Pasadena, California

Before: KLEINFELD, McKEOWN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Fernando Zuniga, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

FILED

APR 09 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

1
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. §

1252 and reviewing de novo, Latter–Singh v. Holder, 668 F.3d 1156, 1159 (9th

Cir. 2012), deny the petition for review.

The BIA correctly determined that Zuniga is statutorily ineligible for

cancellation of removal because his convictions for grand theft under California

Penal Code § 487, United States v. Esparza-Ponce, 193 F.3d 1133, 1136–37 (9th

Cir. 1999), and for petty theft with a prior under §§ 484 and 666, Castillo-Cruz v.

Holder, 581 F.3d 1154, 1160 (9th Cir. 2009), are categorically crimes of moral

turpitude. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(I), 1229b(b)(1)(C). 

Zuniga’s argument that his grand theft conviction was more than thirteen

years prior to his application for cancellation of removal is foreclosed by Flores

Juarez v. Mukasey, 530 F.3d 1020, 1022 (9th Cir. 2008) (per curiam). Zuniga

therefore does not qualify for the petty offenses exception because he has been

convicted of more than one crime of moral turpitude. See 8 U.S.C. §

1182(a)(2)(A)(ii)(II).

2
Zuniga’s claim that the IJ violated his due process rights because the IJ did

not allow Zuniga to present evidence that his removal would result in hardship to

his United States citizen children fails because Zuniga was statutorily ineligible for

cancellation of removal. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000).

PETITION DENIED.

3
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Kearny  Financial  Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John N.
Hopkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.







                                           /s/John N. Hopkins
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John N. Hopkins
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer




February 18, 2005

<PAGE>


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Kearny  Financial  Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Albert
E. Gossweiler, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.






                               /s/Albert E. Gossweiler
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Albert E. Gossweiler
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



February 18, 2005
MCNAB CREEK GOLD CORP.

A Nevada Corporation



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of McNab Creek Gold Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kenneth G. Townsend, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Dated November 15, 2004

/s/Kenneth G. Townsend



Kenneth G. Townsend,

President, Chief Executive Officer

and Chief Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 10, 2015

No. 04-14-00907-CV

IN RE SEGREST SALTWATER RESOURCES, LLC

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

On January 12, 2015, relator filed a motion for reconsideration en banc in this original 

proceeding. On April 2, 2015, relator filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this mandamus 

proceeding pursuant to the parties’ settlement agreement and dismissal of the underlying 

litigation. Accordingly, relator’s motion for reconsideration en banc is DENIED and the 

unopposed motion to dismiss this original proceeding is GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED on April 10, 2015.

PER CURIAM

 ATTESTED TO: ___________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 14-06-0426-CVA, styled Segrest Saltwater Resources, LLC v. Pyote 

Water Systems, LLC; Pyote Water Systems II, LLC; Pyote Water Systems III, LLC; Pyote Water Solutions, LLC; 

Pyote Well Service, LLC; H.H. "Trip" Wommack III; George J. Wommack; Petro Waste Environmental, LLC; Petro 

Waste Environmental LP; and Josh Haislip, pending in the 218th Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas, 

the Honorable Stella Saxon presiding.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SealyMattress Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending February 26, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), David J. McIlquham, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and James B. Hirshorn, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

April 12,2006

|       | /S/    DAVID J. MCILQUHAM                                                                                                 |
|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ** ** | **David  J. McIlquham  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)**                                                  |
|       | /S/    JAMES B. HIRSHORN                                                                                                  |
| ** ** | **James  B. Hirshorn  Senior Executive Vice President Finance,  Operations, Research & Development  (Principal Accounting Officer)** |

 

----
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| April 26, 2011 | /s/ Harvey W. Schiller |
|----------------|------------------------|
|           | Name:                  | Harvey W. Schiller |
|           | Title:                 | Chairman of the Board and |
|           |                   | Chief Executive Officer |
|           |                   | (Principal Executive Officer) |

----