alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004094EN.01004401.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/44

---

Action brought on 16 December 2003 by Angelo Wille against European Parliament

(Case T-412/03)

(2004/C 94/125)

Language of the case: German

An action against the European Parliament was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 16 December 2003 by Angelo Wille, residing in Brussels, represented by D. Rogalla, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the defendant's decisions of 24 February 2003, 28 April 2003, 20 May 2003 and 17 September 2003; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the defendant's decisions of 24 February 2003, 28 April 2003, 20 May 2003 and 17 September 2003;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The applicant challenges the decisions of the Parliament refusing to admit him to competition EUR/A/167/02. The refusal was based on the ground that the applicant had not completed a period of at least two years' professional experience after qualifying as a lawyer.

The applicant claims that the refusal is unlawful, as his application had complied with all time-limits and formal requirements, and as he had also met all other relevant general and particular conditions. He had completed his legal training and had the necessary professional experience. The decisions were unlawful because they were based on an erroneous interpretation by the defendant of the conditions set out in the notice. It was contrary to the wording of the notice and the prohibition on discrimination on grounds of nationality under Article 12 EC to treat university final examinations and the second state examination [Staatsexamen] as being equivalent. No higher standards should be imposed on German lawyers than on graduates from other Member States.

Staatsexamen

---
INTERNATIONALEXECUTRAVE L

257 1 Wes t Carso n Street , Torranc e C A 9050 3 

## 4 b (310)42M88 7 Fax (310 ) 868-262 8 Email : nadine@internationalexecutravel.co m

Marc h 10,201 0 Th e Honorabl e Ra y LaHood Secretary Unite dState s Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S E Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 r o
r— ( O ) Subject : Haned aCombinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceedin g DOT-OST-2010-001 8 Dea r Secretar y LaHood : A s adedicate dtrave l partne r o f America n Airlines , I a

mwritin g i n suppor

t o f American' s applicatio n to provid e ne w servic e fromNe w York' s Joh n F
. Kenned y International Airpor

t an dLo s Angele s Internationa

l Airpor t t o Toky o International Airpor t a t Haneda
. I recogniz e an dapplau dyo u an dth e Obam aadministratio n fo r your succes s las t

Decembe

r i n reachin g alandmar

k Ope n Skie s agreement

wit h Japan , whic h open s u p Haned at o servic e b y U.S
. airlines
. I encourag e your

selectio n o f

American Airline s t o provid e nonsto p servic e fromNe w Yor k an dLo s Angele s t o Haned ai n orde r t o provid e a

n essentia l connectio n betwee n thre e o f th e world' s larges t financial an dcommerc e centers . Recent events , includin g th e successful preservatio n o f Japa n Airlines ' oneworl dAlUance membership , hav e underscore dAmerican' s stron g commitment t o th e trans-Pacifi c market
. America n i s likewis e committe dt o New Yor k an dLo s Angele s - bot

h vital foca

l point s o f

business , trade , entertainment , technolog y an deducatio n - providin g unsurpasse dai r servic e sinc e th e mid-1900 s Bot h th e Ne w Yor

k an dLo s Angele s metr o area s wil l gai n significant economi c benefit s fromthes e propose dne w flights, a s wil l American' s customer s an demployees
. However , w e nee dyour help t o mak e th e JFK/Haned aconnectio n areality
. Therefore , I strongl y urg e yo u t o sa y ye s t o America

n Airline s an dit s reques t fo r slot s t o fly from Kenned y t o Haneda ! Sincerely , Nadin e Koyam a
EXHIBIT 31.1








RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) CERTIFICATION (SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)











I, Andrew J. McMonigle, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2022-4 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.








Date: May 26, 2023








/s/ Andrew J. McMonigle


Name: Andrew J. McMonigle


Title: Vice President and Treasurer


(Senior officer in charge of securitization)


Company: CarMax Auto Funding LLC


as Depositor on behalf of CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2022-4
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00059-CV

CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC.,

Appellant

v.

DANBURY AEROSPACE, INC., Airmotive Engineering Corporation, Engine Components 

International, Inc., EC Services, Inc., Precision Machined Airparts, Inc., Sterling Machinery & 

Process, Inc., and Aircooled Motors, Inc.,

Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CI18283

Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

REVERSED insofar as it awards to Danbury $182,380.06 from the Indemnity Escrow Fund, which 

represents the dispute that remains over accounts payable invoices, and insofar as it awards 

Danbury attorneys’ fees. The judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED in all other respects, which 

includes an award of $388,749.60 from the Indemnity Escrow Fund to Danbury. We REMAND 

the cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this court’s opinion. Costs of 

the appeal are taxed against the party who incurred them.

SIGNED April 1, 2020.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 20, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50560 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus KELLY HARGRAVES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:04-CR-160-2

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Kelly Hargraves appeals his sentence for two counts of attempting to manufacture methamphetamine. He contends that the district court erred in applying the U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(6)(C) enhancement to his sentence for creating a substantial risk of harm to the life of a minor. Section 2D1.1(b)(6)(C) provides that if an offense involved the manufacture of methamphetamine and created a substantial risk of harm to the life of a minor or incompetent, the offense levelNo. 05-50560 -2- should be increased by six levels. The guideline’s commentary instructs that in determining whether the offense created a substantial risk of harm to human life or the environment, the district court shall consider the following factors: (1) the quantity of any chemicals or hazardous substances found at the laboratory and the manner in which they were stored; (2) the manner of disposal of the hazardous or toxic substances and the likelihood of their release into the environment; (3) the offense’s duration and the size of manufacturing operation; and (4) the laboratory’s location ( e.g. , whether it was located in a residential versus a remote area) and the number of human lives enduring a substantial risk of harm. § 2D1.1(b)(6)(C), comment (n.20(A)). A “minor” is defined as a person who has not yet attained the age of 18. Id. at n.20(B); § 2A3.1, comment (n.1). Contrary to Hargraves’s assertions, the presentence report (PSR) and the factual basis, which the district court relied on in applying the enhancement, clearly reflect that a minor was present in the residence while Hargraves was manufacturing methamphetamine. Hargraves’s own argument at the sentencing hearing, that the minor was not present “during all the cooks,” implies that the minor was present “during some of the cooks.” The PSR further reflects that chemical materials were found inside the residence and also in close proximity to the residence. In light of the evidence before the district court, it cannot be said that the district court clearly erred inNo. 05-50560 -3- applying the § 2D1.1(b)(6)(C) enhancement. Cf. United States v. Simpson , 334 F.3d 453, 457-59 (5th Cir. 2003) (court did not uphold enhancement because there was no evidence that a minor was present during the time the defendant was involved in the manufacturing process). Accordingly, Hargraves’s sentence is
AFFIRMED.
EX-10.1


  Exhibit 10.1

   

  AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO

  ORTHOFIX MEDICAL INC.

  AMENDED AND RESTATED

  2012 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

  WHEREAS, Orthofix Medical Inc. (the “Company”) has established and maintains the Amended and Restated 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and

  WHEREAS, the Company’s Board of Directors desires to amend the Plan, subject to the approval of the Company’s shareholders, solely to increase the number of shares of common stock of the Company reserved and available for issuance pursuant to the Plan by 1,325,000 shares.

  NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that by virtue and in exercise of the power reserved to the Company’s Board of Directors by Section 5.3 of the Plan, the Plan be and hereby is amended, subject to approval by the Company’s shareholders (this “Amendment”), in the following particulars, to be effective as of the date the Company’s shareholders approve this Amendment:

  1. 	By substituting the phrase “Eight Million Three-Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand (8,375,000) shares” for the phrase “Seven Million Fifty Thousand (7,050,000) shares” in Section 4.1(a) of the Plan.

  * * * * *

  (Approved by the Company’s shareholders on June 6, 2022)
CERTIFICATION



The certification set forth below is being submitted in
connection with the annual report of SEALSQ Corp (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2022, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), for the purpose of complying with Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code.



Carlos Moreira, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange;
and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|By: | /s/ Carlos Moreira                             | 
|--- | ---------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Carlos Moreira
        Chief Executive Officer | 





Date: June 27, 2023
```

Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Howard Katz, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of MDwerks, Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting./s/ Howard Katz
                                           ---------------

Dated: May 11, 2006
```
# S I T E A L T E R N A T I V E S N E W J A C K S O N V I L L E O D M D S



# L O C A T O R

8 1 ° 1 0 ' 0 " W 8 1 ° 1 0 ' 0 " W

8 1 ° 1 5 ' 0 " W 8 1 ° 1 5 ' 0 " W

8 1 ° 2 0 ' 0 " W 8 1 ° 2 0 ' 0 " W

8 1 ° 2 5 ' 0 " W 8 1 ° 2 5 ' 0 " W30°30'0"N30°30'0"N30°25'0"N30°25'0"N30°20'0"N30°20'0"N

T h i s m a p a n d / o r d i g i t a l d a t a i s f o r p l a n n i n g p u r p o s e s o n l y
a n d s h o u l d n o t b e u s e d t o d e t e r m i n e t h e p r e c i s e l o c a t i o n o f a n y f e a t u r e

. D a t a p r o v i d e d a s

- i s

. C : \ P R O J E C T S \ J A X

_ O D M D S \ P H A S E 2 \ S C O P I N G M E E T I N G \ G e n e r a l M a p s \ A l t s 1

- 3

_ 1 1 x 1 7

. m x d D a t a s o u r c e s : N O A A , U S A C E , U S E P A , A N A M A R

. 

# μ

0 1 2 3 4 M i l e s



## A l t e r n a t i v e 1 4 s q

. n m i

A l t e r n a t i v e 2 4 s q

. n m i A l t e r n a t i v e 3 4 s q

. n m i 

# L E G E N D

A l t e r n a t i v e 1

A l t e r n a t i v e 2

A l t e r n a t i v e 3
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105·3901 

January 28,2011 

Sent Via Email and US Mail: 

Angela Johnson-Meszaros 

Law Offices of Angela Johnson-Meszaros 

1107 Fair Oaks Avenue, #246 

South Pasadena, CA 91030 

Adriano Martinez, Esq. 

1314 Second Street 

Santa Monica, CA 90401 

Shana Lazerow, Esq. 

Communities for a Better Environment 

1440 Broadway, Suite 701 

Oakland, CA 94612 

Re: Request for Extension of Comment Period for EPA-R09-0AR-20 10-1078 

Dear Ms. Johnson-Mezaros, Mr. Martinez and Ms. Lazerow: 

This letter is in response to your letter dated January 21,2011. Your letter requests an 

extension of the comment period for our proposed revision to the California State 

Implementation Plan to incorporate the CPV Sentinel Energy Project AB 1318 Tracking System. 

You have requested that EPA extend the comment period for an additional 60 days because the 

issues are complex and you are working on several other matters. 

We are denying your request for a 60 day extension of the comment period. The CPV 

Sentinel Energy Project AB 1318 Tracking System rule and supporting information has been 

under review by the South Coast Air Quality Management District for a number of months. The 

District provided you with a substantial amount of information regarding this project in response 

to your public records request in late May 2010. The rule language and supporting documents 

were available from the District at least 30 days prior to the rule adoption hearing held by the 

District Board on July 9, 2010. The same information was available when CARB submitted the 

rule to EPA on September 10, 2010. Our proposed approval of the rule is based on information 

that has been publicly available throughout the District and State adoption process. 

In addition, we provided our proposed approval of the rule to you by electronic mail on 

December 30, 20 10 to allow you some additional time until the proposal was published in the 

Pn'ntt'd on Recycled Paper 
Federal Register. Therefore, the comment period will not be extended beyond 30 days following 

publication of the proposal in the Federal Register. 

I appreciate your participation in the process and we look forward to receiving your 

comments. If you have any questions about this matter, please contact me at 415-972-3974 or 

Laura Yannayon at 415-972-3534. 

Sincerely, 

~~~ cc: BatTy Wallerstein

Michael Carroll
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Serge Atlan, certify that: 

  1) I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-QSB of FalconTarget, Inc.;  

  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;  

  3) Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;  

  4) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  

  a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based upon such evaluation; and  

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and  

  5) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):  

  a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information and 

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: November 17, 2006

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan 

    Serge Atlan

    Chairman