alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2542-2543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-934]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

SCHEDULED TO BE PUBLISHED ON JANUARY 17, 2012. 

DATES: Date and Time: Thursday, January 19, 2012 at 10 a.m.

[[Page 2543]]


Place:  999 E Street NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

Status:  This meeting will be open to the public.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The following item has been added to the 
agenda:
    Draft Advisory Opinion 2011-24: Louder Solutions, LLC d/b/a 
StandLouder.com.
    Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such 
as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary, at (202) 694-1040, at 
least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.

Person to Contact for Information:  Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shawn Woodhead Werth,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-934 Filed 1-13-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of The Business Development Corporation of America on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Tristan V. Stonger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 By: Tristan V. StongerTristan V. Stonger, Chief Executive OfficerNovember 19, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21789-21790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8687]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose

[[Page 21790]]

confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Adolescence and Family Health.
    Date: April 18, 2012.
    Time: 11:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Anna L Riley, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 3114, MSC 7759, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-
2889, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#46342f2a233f2728280625353468282f2e68212930"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2f5d46434a564e41416f4c5c5d0141464701484059">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 4, 2012.
Anna P. Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-8687 Filed 4-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment
      Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
      of
      Directors of the Company, certifies that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
              David
              LichtensteinDavid
                Lichtenstein
              Chairman,
                President, and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)
              August
                14, 2006
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 92 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to prohibit 

the use of slavery and involuntary servitude as a punishment for a crime. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 29, 2020 

Mr. RICHMOND submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to prohibit the use of slavery and involuntary 

servitude as a punishment for a crime. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 92 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude may be 

3 imposed as a punishment for a crime.’’. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ALAN I. ARMOUR, II and NASON, YEAGER, GERSON, WHITE & 

LIOCE, P.A.,

Petitioners,

v.

BRIAN HASS, M.D., BRAND PROPERTIES, LLC, a Florida Limited 

Liability Company; and BRAND PROPERTIES II, LLC, a Florida Limited 

Liability Company,

Respondents.

No. 4D14-4375

[ April 8, 2015 ]

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth 

Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Meenu Sasser, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

2014CA007755.

Kathryn L. Smith of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami, for petitioners.

Irwin R. Gilbert, Tabitha A. Taylor and Bryan J. Yarnell of Gilbert 

Yarnell, Palm Beach Gardens, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Alan I. Armour, II, and his law firm, defendants in a legal malpractice 

action, seek certiorari review of a non-final order which denied in part their 

motion to dismiss, abate, or stay the malpractice action. It is undisputed 

that the underlying litigation on which the malpractice action is based is 

still pending. While the trial court stayed the trial, and discovery as to 

damages, it otherwise allowed the action to proceed, including discovery 

as to liability.

Until there is a judgment against plaintiffs in the underlying action, “a 

malpractice claim is ‘hypothetical’ and damages are ‘speculative.’” David 

J. Stern, P.A. v. Sec. Nat’l Servicing Corp., 969 So. 2d 962, 966 (Fla. 2007) 

(quoting Sec. Nat. Servicing Corp. v. Law Office of David J. Stern, P.A., 916 

So. 2d 934, 937 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (quoting Silvestrone v. Edell, 721 So. 

2d 1173, 1175 (Fla. 1998))). The trial court erred in allowing any discovery 

to go forward. The case should have been stayed or abated.
2

Accordingly, we grant the petition. See Burgess v. Lippman, 929 So. 2d 

1097, 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Bierman v. Miller, 639 So. 2d 627 (Fla. 

3d DCA 1994). The plaintiffs’ contention—that an exception to the general 

rule is warranted because they already have suffered damages by 

incurring attorney’s fees in defending the underlying action—is without 

merit. See Bierman, 639 So. 2d at 628 (determining that vacating a stay 

was a departure from the essential requirements of law because the 

malpractice action had not yet accrued and the plaintiff had not yet 

suffered “redressable” harm although plaintiff had amassed considerable 

attorney’s fees in the underlying action).

Petition Granted.

GROSS, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00051-CR

STEVEN DEWAYNE PRUITT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1323451

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Steven Dewayne Pruitt was convicted on an open plea of guilty of delivery of marihuana 

between one-fourth of an ounce and five pounds in a drug-free zone. He was sentenced to two 

years’ imprisonment. This case was tried along with two other companion cases, which are 

subjects of two other pending appeals before this Court.1 Pruitt filed a single, consolidated brief 

covering all three appeals, in which he contends that his guilty pleas were not voluntary because 

of the trial court’s failure to properly admonish Pruitt regarding sentencing in connection with the 

burglary of a habitation charge. 

The argument raised in this appeal is based exclusively on the argument of error brought 

before this Court in the companion appeal styled Pruitt v. State, cause number 06-14-00058-CR. 

In our opinion of this date disposing of that appeal, we found error, but that it did not affect the 

substantial rights of the defendant. Pruitt contends in connection with this appeal that the error 

necessarily made his plea in this case involuntary. For the reasons set out in that opinion, we 

conclude in this case that no harm has been shown and overrule the issue as it applies to this appeal.

 

1

In companion case 06-14-00058-CR, Pruitt appeals from a conviction of burglary of a habitation with the exhibition 

of a deadly weapon. In companion case 06-14-00059-CR, Pruitt appeals from a conviction of delivery of marihuana 

in an amount between one-fourth ounce and five pounds in a drug-free zone.
3

We affirm the judgment.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: February 25, 2015

Date Decided: April 8, 2015

Do Not Publish
**Exhibit 32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ZAGG Incorporated (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert G. Pedersen II,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss..1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15
      (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




**/s/****ROBERT
                G. PEDERSEN II******Robert
                G. Pedersen IIChief
                Executive OfficerAugust
                14, 2008
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sheer Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  May 10, 2005





/s/ Doug Berry

-------------------------------------------

Doug Berry, President and C.E.O.

(Principal Executive Officer)
Filed 4/8/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2015 ND 80

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Brandon Glenn Trimble, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20140349

Appeal from the District Court of LaMoure County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Daniel D. Narum, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Tonya Duffy, Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 5, Lamoure, ND 58458, for plaintiff and appellee.

Scott Orel Diamond, 210 Broadway, Suite 401B, Fargo, ND 58102, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Trimble

No. 20140349

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Brandon Glenn Trimble appeals from an amended criminal judgment.  Trimble argues the district court erred by finding Trimble violated his probation by accessing the internet and by residing away from his home overnight without his probation officer’s permission.  Trimble requests a remand for resentencing.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4), concluding the district court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and the district court did not abuse its discretion when it revoked Trimble’s probation. 

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Kenneth Townsend, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of McNab Creek Gold Corp., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of McNab Creek Gold Corp.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(d)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.







February 15, 2006

Date

Kenneth Townsend,

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Orsus Xelent Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Guoji Liu,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)  The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      May 20, 2009By:
            /s/ Guoji LiuGuoji
      LiuChief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Tower One Wireless Corp.: Exhibit 4.4 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com


    

    Tower One Wireless Corp. ("Tower One Wireless") 

    Loan ITAU - Phase 2


    Year ended December 31, 2021

    Background: 

    Loan Agreement 

    	Effective date:


    September 14, 2021

    	Maturity date:


    Mayo 3, 2031

    	Parties:


    Fideicomiso Tower II, Tower 3 S.A.S. ("Tower") and Itaú Corpbanca Colombia S.A. ("Itaú").

    	Terms:


    Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, Fideicomiso Tower II (the "debtor"), Tower (the "codebtors"), and Itaú (the "lender"), establish a Loan Agreement, pursuant to which Itaú will lend funds for the purpose of constructing cellphone Towers. The loan amount is for up to COP 40,463,000,000.00 (USD 10.2MM). Commerk, is committed to disburse up to COP 13,487,666,666.67 (USD 3.4MM) ("Commerk disbursement").

    	Interest rate: 


    4.39% + IBR (six months)

    	Interest payment: 


    Quarterly

    	Grace period:


    12 months (only for principal)

    	Principal payment: 


    Quarterly based on a gradient.

    	Project:


    This financing will be used to execute the construction of up to 78 towers assigned by TIGO in Colombia. The total amount of the project is COP 53,950,666,666.67 (USD 13.6MM).

    	Functionality:


    Disbursements will occur after a set of towers are constructed and accepted by TIGO.

    The disbursed amount will be calculated based on the free cash flow that each set of towers will generate, granting a DSCR of at least 1.1x.

    The disbursed amount will not exceed the ratio 75/25 (Debt/Commerk disbursement).

    	Collateral:


    A trust has been put in place (Fideicomiso Tower II). The economic rights related to the financed towers are being transferred to the trust and the towers are being pledged.

    	Termination: The agreement will be finished once all the amounts owed and related to it are being satisfied. The loan can be prepaid at any time, this prepayment will not have any cost if happens in an interest payment date.
	Applicable Law: Colombia.