alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Section 1350 Certification





In connection with the Quarterly Report of INTREorg Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Donal R. Schmidt, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and principal financial and accounting officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.Dated: August 15, 2011

/s/Donal R. Schmidt

Donal R. Schmidt, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, principal

executive officer, principal financial and accounting officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NOS. 02-15-00093-CV

 02-15-00094-CV

 02-15-00095-CV

IN THE MATTER OF S.L.T.

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF DENTON COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NOS. JV-2014-00246, DH-2014-0616, JV-2014-00509

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered “Appellant’s Motion For Voluntary Dismissal.” It is the 

court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the 

above appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeals shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution 

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MEIER, JJ. 

DELIVERED: April 9, 2015

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Dismissed and Opinion Filed March 19, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-20-00059-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.E., A.E., AND A.E., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 417th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 417-50225-2018

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Molberg, and Carlyle

Opinion by Justice Molberg

The clerk’s record in this appeal has not been filed because appellant has not 

paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee. By letter dated February 18, 2020, 

we directed appellant to file, within ten days, written verification he had paid or 

made arrangements to pay the fee or was entitled to proceed without payment of 

costs. Although we cautioned appellant that failure to comply could result in 

dismissal of the appeal, appellant has yet to comply. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See id. 37.3(b), 42.3(b),(c).

200059f.p05

/Ken Molberg//

KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF A.E., A.E., 

AND A.E., CHILDREN 

No. 05-20-00059-CV 

On Appeal from the 417th Judicial 

District Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 417-50225-

2018.

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Molberg, Justices Bridges and 

Carlyle participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellee Audrey Evans recover her costs, if any, of this 

appeal from appellant Dustin Dwight Evans.

Judgment entered this 19th day of March 2020.
August 20. 2012 Mr. Dennis DeVany 4201 21st Avenue West Seattle, WA 98199 (206) 282 6I00 ph (206) 282 6103 fax

Chief. Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590 

### 21

Re: DOT-OST-2000-8556- Continuation ofAlaskaAirlines EAS Service to Adak,.AK Dear Mr. DeVany: Iam writing to you today to express oursupport for Alaska Airlines in their bid to continue providing essential air service to Adak. Alaska usingjetaircraft. Ourcompany has multiple fishing vessels that participate in the groundl1sh fisheries in the Aleutian Islands and having reliable passenger and freight service to remote communities such as Adak is essential to our business. We have used Alaska Airlines to transportourcrew and freight to Alaska for many years and we have come to appreciate and rely on the services that the airline provides us. Having the same carrier.bringing ourcrew to Alaska from the lower48 and on to their final destination in Adak has the benefit ofeasy connections. less baggage handling (no need to claim and re-check), and Alaska Airlines many mileage partnerships are an attractive incentive for ourcrew. Alaska Airlines has.the added benefit ofhaving expanded cargocapabilities on their ·combi' aircraft, which allows us to get both people and large freight to Adak on the same flight. This saves both time and money compared othershipping methods. The seafood industry as a whole has benefited from having AlaskaAirlines as the carrier providing essential air service to Adak. We urge DOTto select Alaska Airlines for the carrier so that we may continue to experiencethe benefits they have provided us. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Sincerely, 

# cJiilifr
Todd 

### M. Loomis Ocean Peace. Inc.
Exhibit 35.1

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the “Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer” and “Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of February 23, 2022 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2022-1 Owner Trust, as follows:

(i) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2022, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.


(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of May, 2022.



| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                   
| | Paul C. Honda                                       
| | Vice President and Assistant Secretary              
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)







---
EX-10.1


  Exhibit 10.1

  FIRST AMENDMENT
TO
NUTANIX, INC. SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED OUTSIDE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION POLICY

  Adopted and approved March 30, 2022

   

  The Nutanix, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Outside Director Compensation Policy, effective June 16, 2021 (the “Policy”), is hereby amended as follows:

  1. Section 1 of the Policy is hereby amended by adding the following bullet point immediately following the third bullet point under “Committee Awards” with the first amount appearing under the column heading “Chair” and the second amount appearing under the column heading “Member”:

  				
	“●          Security and Privacy
	$15,000
	$7,500”
	 



  2. Except as otherwise amended, the Policy is hereby confirmed in all other respects.

  3. This First Amendment is effective as of March 30, 2022.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1692

KEIRY SANTOS-SOTO,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U. S. Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A96-236-027)

Submitted: January 24, 2007 Decided: February 12, 2007

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul S. Haar, Pauline M. Schwartz, LAW OFFICES OF PAUL S. HAAR,

Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant

Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, Janice K.

Redfern, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT

OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Keiry Santos-Soto, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (Board) affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s

denial of her requests for asylum and withholding of removal.

Because the Board affirmed under its streamlined process, see 8

C.F.R. § 1003.1(e)(4) (2006), the immigration judge’s decision is

the final agency determination. See Camara v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d

361, 366 (4th Cir. 2004). 

We have reviewed the administrative record and the

immigration judge’s decision and find that substantial evidence

supports the ruling that Santos-Soto failed to establish past

persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution as

necessary to establish eligibility for asylum. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1208.13(a) (2006) (stating that the burden of proof is on the

alien to establish eligibility for asylum); INS v. Elias-Zacarias,

502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992) (same). Moreover, as Santos-Soto cannot

sustain her burden on the asylum claim, she cannot establish her

entitlement to withholding of removal. See Camara, 378 F.3d at 367

(“Because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is higher

than for asylum--even though the facts that must be proved are the

same--an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is necessarily

ineligible for withholding of removal under [8 U.S.C.]

§ 1231(b)(3).”).
- 3 -

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS PUBLIC MEETING ON RESIDENTIAL

FURNACE FANS ENERGY CONSERVATION STA NDARDS

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

. Washington, DC 20585

Friday, July 27 , 2012

Room 8E

- 089



### Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) seeks comments, information, and data from interested

parties on the Energy Conservation Standard (ECS) Pre liminary Analyses for residential

furnace fans.



### Agenda

9:00

– 9 : 15 am Welcome ; Introductions; and Agenda Review

Doug Brookman

9:15

– 10:00 am Purpose of Public Meeting; Opening Statements; Comment

Submission Instructions; and Regulatory Authority and

Rulemaking Overview

Mohammed Khan

10 : 00

– 10 : 45 am Market and Technology Assessment; and Screening Analysis

Sam Jasinski

1 0 : 45

– 11 : 00 am Break

11:00

– 11 : 45 am Engineering Analysis

Sam Jasinski

1 1:45

– 12:30 pm Markups; Energy Use Characterization; and LCC and

Payback Period Analysis

Alex Lekov

12: 30

– 1:30 pm Lunch (on your own)

1:30

– 2:15 pm LCC and Payback Period Analysis (cont.)

Alex Lekov2:15

– 2:45 pm National Impact Analysis

Alex Lekov

2:45

– 2:55 pm Break

2:5 5

– 3:15 pm Preliminary Manufacturer Impact Analysis

Sam Jasinski

3:15

– 3:30 pm Next Steps

Sam Jasinski and Alex Lekov

3:30

– 4:00 pm Closing Remarks from Interested Parties

Mohammed Khan

4:00 pm Adjourn
CCC COMMODITY INVENTORY

As of April 1, 2019

OUTSTANDING UNDER LOAN CCC-OWNED

CY 2016 CY 2017 CY 2018 INVENTORY 2/

(Million Units Except as Noted) (Actual Units)

BUTTER (LB) - - - 0.0

CHEESE (LB) - - - 0.0

NONFAT DRY MILK (LB) - - - 0.0

BARLEY (BU) 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0

CORN (BU) 0.0 0.7 696.6 0.0

OATS (BU) 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0

SORGHUM (BU) 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0

SOYBEANS (BU) 0.0 0.0 156.9 0.0

WHEAT (BU) 0.1 0.0 45.9 0.0

RICE (CWT) 0.0 0.0 23.7 0.0

REFINED SUGAR (Mil. Lbs.) 0.0 76.0 921.0 0.0

 IN-PROCESS BEET 0.0 0.0 1,129.0 0.0

RAW CANE SUGAR (Mil. Lbs.) 0.0 0.0 1,626.7 0.0

 IN-PROCESS CANE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

HONEY (Mil. Lbs.) 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.0

PEANUTS (tons) 0.0 0.0 1,604,000.0 121,684.76

CANOLA SEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 1,288.0 0.0

CRAMBE (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

FLAXSEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 31.0 0.0

MUSTARD SEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 39.0 0.0

RAPESEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

SAFFLOWER SEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0

SESAME SEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

SUNFLOWER SEED (OIL) (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 308.0 0.0

SUNFLOWER SEED (Other) (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 55.0 0.0

DRY PEAS (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 648.0 0.0

LENTILS (CWT) 1/ 0.0 3.0 827.0 0.0

CHICKPEAS (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 1,008.0 0.0

UPLAND COTTON (BALE) 200 0 3,633,800 0

ELS COTTON (BALE) 0 0 143,200 0

1/ Minor Oilseeds & Pulses are in thousand units.

Report Completed: April 10, 2019

2/ CCC acquired 7,099.63 tons peanuts in August from July maturing loans, for a total beginning inventory of 7,099.63 

tons. CCC acquired another 59,478.73 tons of peanuts in September due to August maturing loans. CCC acquired 

another 21,325.03 tons of peanuts in October due to September maturing loans. CCC acquired another 33,781.37 tons 

of peanuts in November due to October maturing loans.This brings total peanut inventory to 121,684.76 tons.
1517 WEST FRONT STREET SUITE 354 TYLER, TX 75702 TEL: 903-593-8471 FAX: 903-593-2193

Serving Anderson, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith, Trinity, Upshur, Van 

Zandt and Wood Counties

www.12thcoa.courts.state.tx.us

CHIEF JUSTICE

JAMES T. WORTHEN

JUSTICES

BRIAN HOYLE

GREG NEELEY

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

CLERK

CATHY S. LUSK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

MARGARET HUSSEY

March 27, 2015

Ms. Lois Rogers

District Clerk, Smith County

Courthouse, Suite 204

100 North Broadway Avenue

Tyler, TX 75702-7201

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 12-13-00367-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 007-0653-13

Style: Justin Davis

v.

The State of Texas

Pursuant to Rule 18.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, enclosed herewith is the 

Mandate issued in the above cause. When the District or County Clerk has executed the 

Mandate in accordance with the opinion of this Court, the Clerk is requested to fill in the 

information below and to return the attached copy to this office.

Very truly yours,

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:_____________________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

C

C

:

Mr. Michael J. West (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. James W. Huggler Jr. (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mandate executed on __6TH day of ____APRIL________, 2015.

Brief explanation of action taken: ______SCANNED_______________________________

_________________LINDA RHYMES_________________________________District/County Clerk

FILE COPY

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 4/6/2015 7:13:03 AM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
## NIOSH Office of Agricultural Safety



## and Health Brad Husberg, Director Pietra Check, Deputy Director

## Office of Agriculture Safety and Health



## (OASH) • Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishing (AgFF) • Set research priorities • Coordinate intramural and extramural research

## Office of Agriculture Safety and Health • Coordinate NIOSH AgFF Program

– Budget

– Strategic directions

– Evaluation

– Outcome tracking

– NORA

– Respond to requests

# AgFF Program Components Intramural • Intramural Projects • Division Discretionary Projects • Other competitive research projects  NIOSHAgFF Steering Committee Extramural • Ag Centers • Cooperative agreements • Grants • Contracts • NORA  NORA Sector Council

## Office of Agriculture Safety and Health



## (OASH) 

# Thank You
**Exhibit 31.1**

Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification

I, Rajesh Kalathur, certify that:

​

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of John Deere Owner Trust 2022-C (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

​

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

​

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing, and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

​

4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

​

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

​

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association (as indenture trustee).

​

​

| Date: January 26, 2023 | By:     | */s/ Rajesh Kalathur*                       |
|------------------------|---------|---------------------------------------------|
| ​                | ​ | Rajesh Kalathur                             |
| ​                | ​ | President of John Deere Capital Corporation |
| ​                | ​ | (as Servicer)                               |

​

----
# C_2004094EN.01003603.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/36

---

Removal from the register of Case C-93/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 94/99)

By order of 4 December 2003 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case C-93/03: Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic.

---

(1)  OJ C 44 of 22.02.2003.

1

---
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 106 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Architect of the Capitol is author3 ized and directed to transfer the catafalque which is situ4 ated in the Exhibition Hall of the Capitol Visitor Center 

5 to the Rotunda of the Capitol so that such catafalque may 

6 be used in connection with services to be 
2 

•HCON 106 EH 

1 conducted there for the Honorable John Lewis, late a Rep2 resentative from the State of Georgia. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 106 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Architect of the Capitol to transfer 

Representative from the State of Georgia. ducted for the Honorable John Lewis, late a Capitol for use in connection with services conthe Capitol Visitor Center to the rotunda of the the catafalque situated in the Exhibition Hall of
Exhibit 32.2 Certificate: 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT OF GRAY PEAKS, INC.**

I, the undersigned, being the one ofthe Co-Chief Executive Officers, respectively, of Gray Peaks, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to the best of his information, knowledge and belief, that (1) the Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)) and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: November 19, 2007 

 

/s/ Bary Bertiger             

----
Scenario SO23

NOx4

PM10 PM Fine PM Course SO2 NOx PM

98th Percentile 

Impact (dv)

98th Percentile 

Improvement (dv)

Class I 

Area

Meterological 

Year

pre-control 3418.0 669.0 31.8 1.9 29.9 Base case Base case - LNB Existing baghouse 1.675 NA TRNP-SU 2002

1 526.5 669.0 31.8 1.9 29.9 Dry Scrubber Base case - LNB Existing baghouse 0.668 1.007 TRNP-SU 2002

2 526.5 665.3 31.8 1.9 29.9 Dry Scrubber LNB/OFA Existing baghouse 0.666 1.009 TRNP-SU 2002

3 526.5 631.6 31.8 1.9 29.9 Dry Scrubber SNCR Existing baghouse 0.648 1.027 TRNP-SU 2002

4 526.5 479.2 31.8 1.9 29.9 Dry Scrubber LNB/OFA+SNCR Existing baghouse 0.565 1.110 TRNP-SU 2002

5 526.5 87.1 31.8 1.9 29.9 Dry Scrubber SCR Existing baghouse 0.270 1.405 TRNP-SU 2002

6 2369.3 669.0 31.8 1.9 29.9 DSI BH Base case - LNB Existing baghouse 1.293 0.382 TRNP-SU 2002

7 2369.3 665.3 31.8 1.9 29.9 DSI BH LNB/OFA Existing baghouse 1.291 0.384 TRNP-SU 2002

8 2369.3 631.6 31.8 1.9 29.9 DSI BH SNCR Existing baghouse 1.272 0.403 TRNP-SU 2002

9 2369.3 479.2 31.8 1.9 29.9 DSI BH LNB/OFA+SNCR Existing baghouse 1.196 0.479 TRNP-SU 2002

10 2369.3 87.1 31.8 1.9 29.9 DSI BH SCR Existing baghouse 0.957 0.718 TRNP-SU 2002

11 263.3 669.0 31.8 1.9 29.9 Wet Scrubber Base case - LNB Existing baghouse 0.556 1.119 TRNP-SU 2002

12 263.3 665.3 31.8 1.9 29.9 Wet Scrubber LNB/OFA Existing baghouse 0.553 1.122 TRNP-SU 2002

13 263.3 631.6 31.8 1.9 29.9 Wet Scrubber SNCR Existing baghouse 0.528 1.147 TRNP-SU 2002

14 263.3 479.2 31.8 1.9 29.9 Wet Scrubber LNB/OFA+SNCR Existing baghouse 0.422 1.253 TRNP-SU 2002

15 263.3 87.1 31.8 1.9 29.9 Wet Scrubber SCR Existing baghouse 0.159 1.516 TRNP-SU 2002

16 1188.0 648.0 31.8 1.9 29.9 PRB PRB Existing baghouse --- --- TRNP-SU 2002

17 1188.0 514.8 31.8 1.9 29.9 PRB LNB/OFA +PRB Existing baghouse --- --- TRNP-SU 2002

18 774.0 514.8 31.8 1.9 29.9 DSI/ESP+PRB LNB/OFA +PRB Existing baghouse --- --- TRNP-SU 2002

19 446.4 514.8 31.8 1.9 29.9 DSI/ESP+PRB LNB/OFA +PRB Existing baghouse --- --- TRNP-SU 2002

20 270.0 514.8 31.8 1.9 29.9

Dry Scrubber+ 

PRB LNB/OFA +PRB Existing baghouse --- --- TRNP-SU 2002

21 526.5 665.3 27.0 1.6 25.4 0.665 1.010 TRNP-SU 2002

22 526.5 665.3 180.0 10.8 169.2 0.686 0.989 TRNP-SU 2002

1

See Appendix C.3 of SIP

3

The precontrol emission rate is based on actual fuel sulfur content, while the control scenario emission rates are based on a worst case sulfur content of 1.56%.

4

Calculated using an assumed heat input of 1800 MMBtu/hr.

Stanton Unit 1 CALPUFF Modeling1,2

2

Scenarios with PRB coal as the fuel type were not modeled. However, for a given control scenario, and when considering a baseline where PRB is the fuel type, the visibility improvement is expected to be 

less than that for lignite.

Emission Rates (lbs/hr) Control Options

Scenario 2 + Best PM Controls

Scenario 2 + Permit Limit PM

7/14/2011