alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of BOOMERS'  CULTURAL  DEVELOPMENT,  INC
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2005,  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Bruce Ellsworth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Bruce Ellsworth
                                                   --------------------------
Date: October 11, 2005           Bruce Ellsworth
                             Chief Executive Officer
DJI	Phantom	3	UAS	Specifications	and	Data	Sheet

Aircraft

Weight (including battery and propellers)

1280 g

Diagonal size (including propellers)

590 mm

Max Ascent Speed

5 m/s

Max Descent Speed

3 m/s

Hover Accuracy

• Vertical: +/- 0.1 m (when Vision Positioning is active) or +/- 0.5 m

• Horizontal: +/- 1.5 m

Max Speed

16 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind)

Max Altitude Above Sea Level

6000 m

Operating Temperature

0°C to 40°C

GPS Mode

GPS/GLONASS

Camera

Sensor

Sony EXMOR 1/2.3” Effective pixels: 12.4 M (total pixels: 12.76 M)

Lens

FOV 94° 20 mm (35 mm format equivalent) f/2.8, focus at ∞

ISO Range

100-3200 (video) 100-1600 (photo) 

Shutter Speed

8s -1/8000s

Image Max Size

4000 x 3000

Still Photography Modes

• Single Shot

• Burst Shooting: 3/5/7 shots

• Auto Exposure Bracketing (AEB): 3/5

• Bracketed Frames at 0.7EV Bias

• Time-lapse

Video Recording Modes

Phantom 3 Professional

• UHD: 4096x2160p 24/25, 3840x2160p 24/25/30

• FHD: 1920x1080p 24/25/30/48/50/60

• HD: 1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60

Phantom 3 Advanced

• FHD: 1920x1080p 24/25/30/48/50/60

• HD: 1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60

Supported SD Card Types

Micro SD

Max capacity: 64 GB. Class 10 or UHS-1 rating required

Max Bitrate of Video Storage

Phantom 3 Professional

60 Mbps

Phantom 3 Advanced

40 Mbps
Supported File Formats

• FAT32/exFAT

• Photo: JPEG, DNG

• Video: MP4, MOV (MPEG-4 AVC/H.264)

Operating Temperature

0°C to 40°C

Gimbal

Controllable Range

Pitch -90° to +30°

Stabilization

3-axis (pitch, roll, yaw)

Vision 

Positioning

Max Velocity

Less than 8 m/s (when 2 m above ground)

Altitude Range

30 cm-300 cm

Operating Range

30 cm-300 cm

Operating Environment

Surface with clear pattern and adequate lighting (Lux > 15)

Remote 

Controller

Operating Frequency

2.400 GHz-2.483 GHz

Max Distance

2000m (outdoors and unobstructed)

Video Output Port

USB

Operating Temperature

0°C- 40°C

Battery

6000 mAh LiPo 2S

Mobile Device Holder

For tablet or phone

Receiver Sensitivity (1%PER)

-101 dBm ±2 dBm

Transmitter Power (EIRP)

• FCC: 20 dBm

• CE: 16 dBm

Working Voltage

1.2 A @7.4 V

Battery 

Charger

Voltage

17.4 V

Rated Power

Phantom 3 Professional

• 100 W

Phantom 3 Advanced

• 57 W

Intelligent 

Flight Battery

Capacity

4480 mAh

Voltage

15.2 V

Battery Type

LiPo 4S

Energy

68 Wh
Net Weight

365 g

Max Flight Time

Approximately 23 minutes 

Operating Temperature

-10°C to 40°C

Max Charging Power

100 W

App / Live 

View

Mobile App

DJI GO

EIRP

100mW

Live View Working Frequency

2.4GHz ISM

Live View Quality

720P @ 30fps (depending on conditions and mobile device)

Latency

220ms (depending on conditions and mobile device)

Required Operating Systems

• iOS 8.0 or later

Recommended Devices

• iOS: iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPad Air, iPad Air Wi-Fi + Cellular, 

iPad mini 2, iPad mini 2 Wi-Fi + Cellular, iPad Air 2, iPad Air 2 Wi-Fi + 

Cellular, iPad mini 3, and iPad mini 3 Wi-Fi + Cellular. This app is optimized 

for iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, and iPhone 6 Plus

• Android version coming soon.
#### Jimmy Lee BONNER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-79-488.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

March 13, 1981.

Shoemake & Briggs, George G. Briggs, Pawhuska, for appellant.

Jan Eric Cartwright, Atty. Gen., Mary Bryce Leader, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

On appeal from the judgment and sentence rendered against him in Kay County District Court Case No. CRF-78-64, wherein he was convicted by a jury of Robbery with Firearms, 21 O.S.Supp.1973, § 801, AFCF, and given twenty (20) years imprisonment, appellant, Jimmy Lee Bonner, urges as his sole assignment of error that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict.

The evidence of the State established that appellant was the driver of an automobile used in the armed robbery of a drive-in theater in Kay County on April 18, 1978. Evidence of the following facts was adduced by the State: (1) Appellant backed the car into an alley near the drive-in; (2) a passenger, one Bennett, put a nylon stocking over his head, walked to the theater office where he committed the armed robbery, returned to the car and got back in whereupon appellant drove away; (3) a theater employee pursued appellant in a high speed chase punctuated by gunshots fired from appellant’s vehicle; (4) appellant’s car was rammed by the other, and came to a stop; (5) officers summoned to the scene found a gun and money in the abandoned car, and discovered appellant hiding in a trash can nearby.

Where the prosecution establishes a prima facie case, the evidence is not insufficient as a matter of law, and conflicts in the evidence are for the trier of fact. See *Renfro v. State,*607 P.2d 703 (Okl.Cr.1980). *1268The evidence outlined above is clearly sufficient to make out a case against appellant as an aider and abettor, and hence a principal, in the armed robbery. See 21 O.S.1971, § 172. This assignment of error is without merit.

The judgment and sentence appealed from is accordingly

AFFIRMED.

BRETT, P. J., and CORNISH, J., concur.
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of SI Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the period covered by this Report.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|By: /s/ Rheo A. Brouillard                                     
|Rheo A. Brouillard                                             
|President and Chief Executive Officer                          
|November 15, 2010                                              
|                                                               
|By: /s/ Brian J. Hull                                          
|Brian J. Hull                                                  
|Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
|November 15, 2010
Exhibit
10.26


 


EXTENSION


 


Pursuant
to that certain Convertible Promissory Note, dated January 31, 2019 (the “Note”), by BioLife4D Corporation (“Borrower”)
in favor of Julius S. Levine Trust (“Lender”), Lender has loaned to Borrower the sum of $30,000.00. Pursuant to the Note,
Borrower has the right to extend the Maturity Date (as defined in the Note) until January 31, 2024. Accordingly, Borrower hereby extends
the Maturity Date of the Note until January 31, 2024.


 


Dated:
January 12, 2022


 


BIOLIFE4D
CORPORATION


 


	BY: 	/s/
    Steven Morris	 
	 	Steven
    Morris, CEO
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-41552 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CONRADO PULIDO, also known as Junior, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. V-02-CR-36-1

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Conrado Pulido pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting in the distribution of less than 500 grams of cocaine. He appeals the 120-month term of imprisonment imposed, arguing that the district court clearly erred in adjusting his offense level for his leadership role in the offense. Pulido withdrew his objection to the adjustment for his leadership role in the offense at the sentencing hearing. Pulido has thus waived any challenge to the adjustment made based United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D June 22, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 03-41552 -2- on his role in the offense, and his argument is not reviewable on appeal. See United States v. Musquiz , 45 F.3d 927, 931 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 733 (1993).
AFFIRMED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 8, 2023

No. 04-23-00839-CR

Kevin ODELL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022CR5901

Honorable Andrew Carruthers, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK 

OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on November 8, 2023.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of November, 2023.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
oEDSTqpF .e yU 2 W UNITEDSTATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D

.C. 20460 Q OFFICE OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY 

## DEC 2 1 2010 Mr. Orlin Loucks Protection Automotive P.O . Box 568 

### 207 N . Broadway Protection, KS 67127 Dear Mr . Loucks: Thankyoufor your letter of November 30, 2010 to the U .S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lisa P . Jackson, regarding EPA's proposed rule, "Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials that are Solid Waste." In your letter, you express concerns that the rule may seriously impact the current used oil management system, stating that you would no longer accept used oil andyour belief that many people would not dispose of used oil properly. I appreciate your interest in these important issues, andwant to assure you that EPA does not want to reduce legitimate recycling ofused-oil . Used oil is one of many non-hazardous secondary materials discussed in the proposed rule. The preamble to the proposed rule specifically discussed used oil that meets "onspecification" criteria under 40 CFRPat 279standards for management of used oil, and "offspecification" used oil that does not meet those standards. Underthe proposal, on-spec used oil is considered to be a "traditional fuel ." Traditional fuels are those fuels that have been historically managed as valuable fuel products rather than being managed as waste materials, and are not considered to be solidwastes under the proposed rule. Thus, on-spec used oil would not be considered a solid waste when burned as a fuel under the proposed rule. 

### Off-spec used oil is considered to be a solid waste underthe proposed rule and combustion units burning off-spec used oil would be subject to the appropriate standards under section 129 ofthe Clean Air Act for solid waste incinerators. This proposed approach would provide an additional measure ofcontrol to address the higher level ofcontaminants that could be present in off-spec used oil . Under the proposed rule, off-spec used oil that is processed into on-spec used oil, however, would not be considered a solid waste. The Agency will promulgate a final rule based on the entirety ofthe comments provided and all information and data available to it. I appreciate your concerns andwill ensure that your letter is entered into the rulemaking docket (EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329) for consideration as the final rule is developed.Again, thankyoufor your letter. Ifyou have further questions, please contact George

Faison of my staffat (703) 305-7652 or via email at faison.george(~a,epa.gov. 

### Sincerely, Georgina M

. Guernica, Acting Chief Permits Branch Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery
Exhibit 10.8


 


Amendment #2 to

Promissory Note


 


This AMENDMENT (this “AMENDMENT”)
is entered into by and between Company and Holder (each as defined below), effective as of June 3, 2022 (the “Effective Date”),
binding on the undersigned parties as of that date.


 


Odyssey Group International,
Inc. (“BORROWER”) and ____________ (“LENDER”) entered into that certain Promissory Note (the “Note”)
dated December ___ 2021, as amended April 20, 2022, in the amount of $25,000.00 (the “Loan Amount”). Capitalized terms
not otherwise defined have the meaning set forth in the Note.


 


Whereas,
the parties have agreed to extend the maturity date of the Note subject to the conditions contained herein.


 


AGREEMENT


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.             
Extension of Maturity Date. The Maturity Date of the Note is amended and extended to September 30, 2022.


 


2.             
Effectiveness; Conflict. Except as modified hereby, the Note and terms thereof shall remain in full force
and effect. On and after the effectiveness of this Amendment, each reference in the Notes to “this Agreement,” “hereunder,”
“hereof,” “herein” or words of like import shall mean and be a reference to the Note, as amended by this Amendment.
To the extent the terms of this Amendment conflict with any provision of the Note or any of the documents referenced therein, then the
provisions of this Amendment shall control.


 


3.            
Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed by facsimile transmission and in counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement.


 


4.             
All Other Terms. All other terms and conditions of the Note remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and acknowledging acceptance
and agreement of the foregoing, BORROWER, and LENDER affix their signatures hereto,


 





	Odyssey Group International, Inc.	 	Individual
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:	J. Michael Redmond	 	By:	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:	President	 	An Individual
	 	 	 	 
	Dated:	June 3, 2022	 	Dated:	June 3, 2022
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05043

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

05043\05043_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05043\05043_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05043\05043_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05043\05043_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05043\05043_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05043\05043_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

05043\Supporting Documents\05043_Wansley certification statement.pdf Plant certification statement

05043\Supporting Documents\05043_Transmittal letter - Georgia Power.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05043\Supporting Documents\05043_Wansley A2-3 EIS.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05043\Supporting Documents\05043_Wansley Diagram C2-31-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05043\Supporting Documents\05043_Wansley Diagram C2-31-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05043\Supporting Documents\05043_Wansley Diagram C2-31-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05043\Supporting Documents\05043_Wansley Diagram C2-31-4.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05043\Supporting Documents\05043_Wansley Diagram D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05043\Supporting Documents\05043_Wansley Diagram D-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05043\Supporting Documents\05043_Wansley Diagram WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05043\Supporting Documents\05043_Wansley Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05043\Supporting Documents\05043_Wansley Map-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05043\05043_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05043\05043_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
# C_2004094EN.01001301.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/13

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

10 December 2003

in Case C-204/02 P: Colin Joynson v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Appeal - Agreements - Standard leases for public houses - Appeal manifestly inadmissible and manifestly unfounded)

(2004/C 94/24)

Language of the case: English

In Case C-204/02 P: Colin Joynson, residing in Manchester (United Kingdom), represented by S. Ferdinand, Solicitor: Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Third Chamber) of 21 March 2002 in Case T 231/99 Joynson v Commission [2002] ECR II 2085, seeking to have that judgment set aside, the other parties to the proceedings being: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: K. Wiedner, assisted by N. Khan), with an address for service in Luxembourg, Six Continents plc, formerly Bass plc, established in London (Agents: J. Block and J. Baxter), with an address for service in Luxembourg, the Court (Third Chamber), composed of: C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), acting for the President of the Third Chamber, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues and J. P. Puissochet, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has made an order on 10 December 2003, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Joynson shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Joynson shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 191 of 10.08.2002.

1

---
I, Gianni P. Gatto, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report
on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of
Daimler Trucks Retail Trust 2022-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the
Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all
of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report
is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;



4. I am responsible for reviewing
the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer
compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic
reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation
AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in
this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications
above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank Trust Company,
National Association, as Indenture Trustee.



Date: March 28, 2024



| | By:                                                                                                                          | /s/ Gianni P. Gatto
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------
| | Name:  Gianni P. Gatto                                                                                                      
| | Title:  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (senior officer
    in charge of the servicing function for the Servicer)