alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
})enneth lJ. Aidd leio~ 

A 11 reJ Uf);t #s~s~ llo , 

~I a/ rM Z!f;.,q JV, 

'Ioua Pa)K,H.. ?te31e? 

Lie rK 

(CJi1RT oF C. {(I Mii.JaL A PPeAJs oF IE'J..A.S 

P.o~ ~6X.. 1 Ol0a! 

C.AP::r-roL ..S7A-I:r6N 

Aus1-:r JJ, (EtAS )f>?ll 

RE; \!Vril- /116. WR-to7-/JJ-oJ.. 

s-r~LE: M'IL>oLJ:/6AI, f..tAJJVE.TH WAYNE 

TRl/\l c_ 1 Nb~ 8C/C.Rato5?- 8~-~ 

Apnl a, d,(J/sRECEIVED IN 

COURT OF r.RIMINPlt APPEALS 

APR 07 2:Jh 

Ab~ Acosta, Clerk 

A~ier- be;;l5 rMti~lde thd m~ I lo? LJaS rcc..e..i ved a lld p1eJeJrteJ lo tAc 

C6cob, "T have no~ hcatd trum th. C...at.ulo ·::r rec<.:..:ved noi/ce. Oh fn/18/J;)a)J.. .. 

: Cci fl yall j e [. Jnf:. Jl.haU 0 ~ Q Yl\( dJ foS/)/t/}1 011 JrJV (J;,j OJ' j .! /£ ht15 

bee11 h ea~'d h.; tl e C.Ou;l, 

·:r LJauld l..Y~ ~ ·};)~ q ioJitLJ /.Jf beca(JJ<: 1:.~ sa )tQ has happel/ Qsalh . 

f2lto/~ den;cJ ·tor Yl!JJe (COJJJ'JS i) J J AA 'dd/- L 

/(C.!)!Jcth W, /VIJ <:-7fj}J 

~~(J/tl~
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JULIE VAUGHNS
, Appellant,

v.

CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1306

[ April 11, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael A. Robinson , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE

- 16

- 003407

.

Melissa A. Giasi of Sivyer Barlow & Watson, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

Maureen G. Pearcy of Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, Coral Gables, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER
, G ROSS and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS

TROY WILLIAMS

V. NO. 3-14-00228-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS

APPELLANT’S THIRD MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, Troy Williams, by and through his attorney of record, 

Linda Icenhauer-Ramirez, and files this his Third Motion for Extension of 

Time to Brief and in support thereof, would show the Court the following:

I.

That the above-styled and numbered cause is styled The State of

Texas v. Troy Williams, Cause Number D-1-DC-12-904077 in the 147th

Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas. Appellant was sentenced on 

April 4, 2014.

II.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of aggravated kidnapping and 

punishment was assessed at sixty (60) years.

III.

Appellant’s motion for new trial was filed on April 10, 2014. Notice 

ACCEPTED

03-14-00228-CR

4815234

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/8/2015 4:29:19 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/8/2015 4:29:19 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
of appeal was filed on April 10, 2014. The reporter’s record was filed on 

December 2, 2014, and the clerk’s record was filed on August 4, 2014. The 

due date for the brief is Thursday, April 9, 2015. 

IV.

This is Appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file his brief. 

Appellant respectfully requests a forty-five day extension of time to file the 

brief, which would make such brief due on Sunday, May 24, 2015. The next 

working day is Monday, May 25, 2015. 

V.

The undersigned attorney has begun work on this case but has been 

unable to complete the brief due to necessary work needed to be completed

on several other appeal cases and due to her busy schedule in both the 

district and county courts of Travis, Williamson and Hays Counties. She 

recently filed a supplemental brief in the case of In the Matter of J.M., 03-

14-00027-CV and she is preparing for oral argument in that case on April 

22, 2015. This next week she will be filing a brief in the case of State of 

Texas v. Brian Roland Chandler, Cause No. 03-14-00547-CR, and she is 

also working on a brief in the case of Levardo Cantos v. State of Texas, 

Cause No. 03-14-00585-CR. She asks that this extension be granted so that 

she may effectively represent Appellant and so that justice may be done in 
this case. 

 Respectfully Submitted

/s/ Linda Icenhauer-Ramirez 

LINDA ICENHAUER-RAMIREZ

Attorney at Law

1103 Nueces

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 477-7991

FAX #: (512) 477-3580

SBN: 10382944

EMAIL: ljir@aol.com

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

ON APPEAL ONLY

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

I hereby certify that this motion was computer generated and contains

483 words, as calculated by the word count function on my computer.

 /s/ Linda Icenhauer-Ramirez 

LINDA ICENHAUER-RAMIREZ

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Linda Icenhauer-Ramirez, hereby certify that a true and correct 

copy of the foregoing Appellant’s Third Motion for Extension of Time to 

Brief was served by e-file to the Travis County District Attorney's Office on 

this the 8th day of April, 2015.

/s/ Linda Icenhauer-Ramirez 

LINDA ICENHAUER-RAMIREZ
Order entered April 6, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00531-CV

JUAN CARLOS FLORES, Appellant

V.

CHASCO, INC. A/K/A CHASCO INTERIORS, INC., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-09-14912-H

ORDER

We GRANT appellees’ March 31, 2015 unopposed motion for extension of time to file 

joint brief and motion to increase word count by 673 words and ORDER the brief tendered to 

the Clerk of the Court April 1, 2015 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2

Certificate:

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

OF GRAY PEAKS, INC.

I, the undersigned, being the one of the Co-Chief
Executive Officers, respectively, of Gray Peaks, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best of his information, knowledge and belief, that (1) the Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)) and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 17, 2007



|                  |  |                           
|----------------- |  | --------------------------
|/s/ Bary Bertiger
|Title:            |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer
# C_2004094EN.01001702.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/17

---

ORDER OF THE COURT

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 11 February 2004

in Case C-180/03 P: Benito Latino v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Appeal - Officials - Occupational disease - Recognition of the occupational origin of arthrosis-related damage - Validity of the opinion of the Medical Committee - Exhaustion of the latter's competence and requirement that it act impartially - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure)

(2004/C 94/35)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-180/03 P; Benito Latino, a former official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing at Sérignac-Peboudou (France) (lawyers: J.R. Iturriagagoitia Bassas and K. Delvolvé) — appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (First Chamber) of 26 February 2003 in Case T-145/01 Latino v Commission (not yet published in the ECR), seeking to have that judgment set aside, the other party to the proceedings being: Commission of the European Communities (Agent: J. Currall, assisted by J.-F. Fagnart) — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of C. Gulmann, President of the Chamber, S. von Bahr and R. Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur), Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has made an order on 11 February 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

Latino

Commission

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Latino is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Latino is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 158 of 5.7.2003.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: R.L., A MINOR

PETITION OF: E.L., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 192 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN RE: ADOPTION OF: R.E.L., A MINOR

PETITION OF: E.L., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 193 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: K.L., A MINOR

PETITION OF: E.L., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 194 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN RE: ADOPTION OF: K.M.L., A MINOR

PETITION OF: E.L., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 195 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: D.L., A MINOR

PETITION OF: E.L., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 196 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN RE: ADOPTION OF: D.L.L, A MINOR

PETITION OF: E.L., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 197 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: A.L., A MINOR

PETITION OF: E.L., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 198 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court
[192 MAL 2020, 193 MAL 2020, 194 MAL 2020, 195 MAL 2020, 196 MAL 2020, 197 

MAL 2020, 198 MAL 2020, 199 MAL 2020, 200 MAL 2020, 201 MAL 2020, 202 MAL 

2020, 203 MAL 2020, 204 MAL 2020 and 205 MAL 2020] - 2

IN RE: ADOPTION OF: A.N.L., A MINOR

PETITION OF: E.L., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 199 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: T.L., A MINOR

PETITION OF: E.L., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 200 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN RE: ADOPTION OF: T.O.L., A MINOR

PETITION OF: E.L., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 201 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: E.L., A MINOR

PETITION OF: E.L., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 202 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN RE: ADOPTION OF: E.L.L., A MINOR

PETITION OF: E.L., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 203 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: W.L., A MINOR

PETITION OF: E.L., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 204 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN RE: ADOPTION OF: W.A.L., A MINOR

PETITION OF: E.L., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 205 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER
[192 MAL 2020, 193 MAL 2020, 194 MAL 2020, 195 MAL 2020, 196 MAL 2020, 197 

MAL 2020, 198 MAL 2020, 199 MAL 2020, 200 MAL 2020, 201 MAL 2020, 202 MAL 

2020, 203 MAL 2020, 204 MAL 2020 and 205 MAL 2020] - 3

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of June, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Orsus Xelent Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhao
Hongwei, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1)  The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      May 20, 2009By:
            /s/ Zhao HongweiZhao
      HongweiChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Nortli

**~ay** 

# 5\irMuseum wfiere wings of tfieyaststi[[ 

## j[y l1 501c(J)

**~O~""f'Hfit**eWitai/e O"J"Uizo.tiM

November 1, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION The Rules Docket (AGC 200) Federal Aviation Administration 800 IndependenceAvenue, SW Washington, DC 20501 Re: Renewal of Living History Flight Experience, Exemption No. 10977, Regulatory Docket No FAA-2009-1034 Please letthis letterserve as a request for renewal of Exemption No. 10977, Regulatory Docket No FAA-2009-1034, currently due to expire April2016. The North Bay Air Museum continues to operate thefollowing aircraftforthe purpose ofcarrying passengers for hire on local flights for educational and instructional purposes underthe terms and conditions ofour Exemption No. 10977 North American F-51-D, registration No N51GP, serial No 44-74483 Curtiss P-40-N5, registration No. N540TP, serial No. 42-105306 The North Bay Air Museum continues to hold a determination from the IRS as a 501(c)(3) charitable organization and all conditions associated with our program and the reasons presented with our original petition remain unchanged. Please feel free to call me with any questionsyou may have. Thank you for yourtime and consideration. Sincerely,

North Bay Air Museum

**~** 23982 Arnold

**Drive~** Sonoma, CA 95476

**~** 707-934-5158

**~** www.northbayairmuseum.org
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 7, 2015

No. 04-15-00196-CR

Michael S. EISENHAUER,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR6130

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Michael S. Eisenhauer entered into a plea bargain with the State, pursuant to which he 

pleaded guilty to a second offense of assault–family violence. The trial court imposed sentence 

in accordance with the agreement on April 4, 2014, and signed a certificate stating this “is a pleabargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). A notice 

of appeal was due July 3, 2014, or the notice and a motion for extension of time to file, were due 

July 18, 2014. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1), 26.3. Eisenhauer did not file his notice of appeal until 

March 24, 2015. 

The clerk’s record also includes the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification and the 

written plea bargain agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). This court must dismiss an appeal 

“if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the 

record.” Id. The record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the 

punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(a)(2). The record also appears to support the trial court’s certification that Eisenhauer does 

not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding 

that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification 

is accurate).

Eisenhauer is given notice that this appeal will be dismissed unless, by April 17, 2015, 

(1) he files a response establishing that the notice of appeal was timely filed by mail and (2) an 

amended certification showing that he has the right to appeal is made part of the appellate record. 

See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (holding that timely notice of 

appeal is necessary to invoke court of appeals’ jurisdiction); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; 

Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 

04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). 
If a supplemental clerk’s record is required to show the appeal is timely, Eisenhauer must 

request a supplemental record from the trial court clerk and file a copy of the request with this 

court. If appellant fails to satisfactorily respond to this order within the time provided, the appeal 

will be dismissed. 

We order all appellate deadlines suspended until further order of the court. We further 

order the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on the attorneys of record and the court 

reporter.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
1

Parsons, Nick

From: Shrager, Brian

Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 11:18 AM

To: Parsons, Nick; Siefers, Andrea; Bouchard, Andrew

Cc: Lassiter, Penny

Subject: FW: Chemical Sector Emissions Data Evaluation

Attachments: Emission Data Evaluation for Chemical Sector Subpart OOO, PPP and JJJ.pdf; Chemical 

Sector- Subpart JJJ, OOO and PPP.xlsx

Chemical Sector Response from NC 

From: Colon, Teresa [mailto:teresa.colon@ncdenr.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 11:05 AM 

To: Shrager, Brian 

Subject: Chemical Sector Emissions Data Evaluation 

Mr. Shrager 

Enclosed you will find official letter and excel spreadsheet with evaluated data. 

If you have any question please do not hesitate to contact me 

Thanks, 

Teresa 

Teresa Del P. Colón, Environmental Engineer 

Toxics Protection Branch 

Division of Air Quality, DENR 

1641 Mail Services Center 

Raleigh, NC 27699-1641 

Phone/fax : 919-707-8436

www.ncair.org

teresa.colon@ncdenr.gov

*********************************************************************************** 

Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third 

parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation
# Permits/NSR/Toxics Integration Subcommittee Report to CAAAC January 8, 2008 Kimber Scavo/Jeff Muffat



# Agenda for January 7

z 

## Bill Becker: NACAA’s recommendations z 

## John Walke, NRDC: Environmental transition recommendations z 

## Robert Wyman: Implications of State’s 185 Fee Programs z 

## Regulatory update for NAAQS Implementation

1

# NACAA Recommendations

z Strong Majority/Consensus Views z Legislative action on Global Warming

– Also use existing authorities z Regulatory and Statutory Initiatives

– Interstate transport, CAMR, Air toxics standards, ocean-going vessels, SAFETEA-LU z Rescind/reverse ill- advised actions

– CA waiver, NSR, science-based NAAQS process, reverse policy on exempting AFOs, reissue area source standards, reissue residual risk, rescind start-up/shutdown/malfunction rule z Increase financial and technical assistance to State and Local Air agencies



# Environmental Recommendations

z Power plants: stronger CAIR & proposed FIP z Mercury MACT: abandon the cert petition z Ozone and PM: the NAAQS and implementation z Diesel Engines: HDD Truck and bus engines and ships z Adopt protective cancer risk policies for all future HAPs, revise recent rules that allow excessive risk, reverse loopholes for toxic emissions from solid and hazardous waste incineration and promulgate an industrial boiler MACT z Legislative recommendations as well (power plants, toxics and monitoring) z Global Warming: regulatory and legislative



### 2

# Regulatory Update

z 

## 24-hr PM2.5 Designations finalized 12-22 z 

## .080 ozone proposal on Subpart 1 & 2: signature today z 

## .075 ozone proposal: March/April z 

## NO2/SO2 implementation rule proposals this year z 

## .080 ozone SIP disapprovals on Jan 9 z 

## Regional Haze findings on Jan 9



# Next Steps

z 

## Section 185: interim discussions with small group to report back at next meeting

z 

## Next meeting: May 2009.

3
EPA Registration Jacket 432-1478

Vol.2
----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/Michael                Piazza                                           |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael                Piazza                                              |
| President,                Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer            |
| Date:                      November 14, 2005 |

----
EXHIBIT
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of GlobalOptions Group, Inc., (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey
      O. Nyweide, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.
      C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      May
      16, 2007


By: /s/
          Jeffrey O. Nyweide Jeffrey
          O. Nyweide Chief
            Financial Officer, Executive Vice
 President,
            Corporate Development and
 Secretary
            (Principal Financial Officer and
 Principal
            Accounting Officer)
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00454

- CR

Everett Craig Williams

v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 94th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 17FC

- 1694C

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed

. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. April 23, 2020