alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

      ( print page 21981)    
                    This notice is to inform the public that the Export-Import Bank of the United States has received an application for a $19.5 million long-term guarantee to support the export of approximately $30 million worth of mining trucks to the Ukraine. The repayment term of the guarantee is 7 years. The U.S. exports will enable the Ukrainian mining company to establish a maximum production capacity of 28 million metric tons of iron ore per year. Available information indicates that all of the Ukrainian iron ore production will be sold domestically in the Ukraine. Interested parties may submit comments on this transaction by email to                     *economic.impact@exim.gov*                     or by mail to 811 Vermont Avenue NW., Room 947, Washington, DC 20571, within 14 days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Angela Mariana Freyre,

Senior Vice President and General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2012-8829 Filed 4-11-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Western Exploration Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, I, Peter Banysch , Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Western Exploration, Inc. Inc. hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

| 1.     | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                             |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Western Exploration, Inc. |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |

 

Dated: May 11, 2005

 

**WESTERN EXPLORATION INC.**

 

By: */s/ Peter Banysch*

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2













CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of ZAGG Inc (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Brandon T. O’Brien, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/BRANDON T. O’BRIENBrandon T. O’Brien

Chief Financial Officer

January 27, 2012




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CW)

FILED

APR - 6 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Courts forthe District of Columbia
J. BISHOP, )
)
Plaintiff, )
) Case: 1:15-cv-00485
v. ) Assigned To : Unassigned
) Assign. Date : 4/6/2015
LEO BONNER, ) Description: Pro Se Gen. Civil (F Deck)
)
Defendant. y
MEMORANDUM OPINION

The trial court has the discretion to decide whether a complaint is frivolous, and such
finding is appropriate when the facts alleged are irrational or wholly incredible. Denton v.
Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992); see Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S, 319, 325 (1989) (“[A]
complaint, containing as it does both factual allegations and legal conclusions, is frivolous where
it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.”). The Court has reviewed the complaint, and
although it is not entirely clear, the Court understands plaintiff to state a claim for assault by
means of witchcraft. On this basis, the Court concludes that what factual contentions are
identifiable are baseless and wholly incredible, and that the allegations of the complaint
“constitute the sort of patently insubstantial claims” that deprive the Court of subject matter

jurisdiction. Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1010 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

The Court will grant plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss
the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). An Order consistent with this

Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

pare: Laut 2 Rois A pe Lire

pinitda Sfhtes District Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 57 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.57
                                     Agreed to September 9, 2019        

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT COMMEMORATING 400TH 
              ANNIVERSARY OF ARRIVAL OF FIRST AFRICAN SLAVES.

    Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be 
used on September 10, 2019, for an event to commemorate the 400th 
anniversary of the arrival of the first African slaves to the territory 
that would become the United States. Physical preparations for the 
ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 
Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 76 

Expressing support for the designation of March 21, 2017, as ‘‘National 

Rosie the Riveter Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 1, 2017 

Mr. CASEY (for himself, Mr. ISAKSON, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. COONS, and Mrs. 

SHAHEEN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of March 21, 2017, 

as ‘‘National Rosie the Riveter Day’’. 

Whereas National Rosie the Riveter Day is a collective national effort to raise awareness of the 16,000,000 women 

who worked during World War II; 

Whereas the people of the United States have chosen to 

honor women workers who contributed from the home 

front during World War II; 

Whereas those women left their homes to work or volunteer 

full-time in factories, farms, shipyards, airplane factories, 

banks, and other institutions in support of the Armed 

Forces overseas; 

Whereas those women worked with the United Service Organizations and the American Red Cross, drove trucks, rivVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:29 Mar 01, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR76.IS SR76

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 76 IS 

eted airplane parts, collected critical materials, rolled 

bandages, and served on rationing boards; 

Whereas it is fitting and proper to recognize and preserve the 

history and legacy of working women, including volunteer 

women, during World War II to promote cooperation and 

fellowship among those women and their descendants; 

Whereas those women and their descendants wish to further 

the advancement of patriotic ideas, excellence in the 

workplace, and loyalty to the United States; and 

Whereas March 21, 2017, during Women’s History Month, is 

an appropriate day to designate as ‘‘National Rosie the 

Riveter Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the designation of March 21, 

3 2017, as ‘‘National Rosie the Riveter Day’’; and 

4 (2) acknowledges the important role played by 

5 women during World War II. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
#### PEOPLE OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD, Petitioner, v. The ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, and Russell E. Train, as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, Respondents. STATE OF WASHINGTON and its Department of Ecology, Petitioners, v. The ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, and Russell E. Train, as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, United States of America, Respondents.

Nos. 73-2466, 73-2486 and 74-1189.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Aug. 6, 1976.

Roderick Walston, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), San Francisco, Cal., and Charles B. Roe, Jr., Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen. (argued), Olympia, Wash., for petitioners.

Raymond W. Mushal, Atty. (argued), App. Section, Land and Natural Resources Div., U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondents.

*

 Honorable James M. Burns, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation.

ORDER

Before WRIGHT and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and BURNS,* District Judge.

It appearing that upon writ of certiorari the Supreme Court of the United States, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2022, 48 L.Ed.2d 528 has reversed the judgment of this court in its opinion of February 13, 1975, 9 Cir., 511 F.2d 963, and remanded to this court for further proceedings,

IT IS ORDERED that this court’s opinion of February 13,1975 is vacated and that the action of the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency in denying the application of the state agencies of Washington and California is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 19 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 19

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 9, 2019

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX DERBY RACES.

    (a) In General.--The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association 
(in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') shall be permitted 
to sponsor a public

              

 event, soap box derby races (in this resolution referred to as the 
``event''), on the Capitol Grounds.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on June 15, 2019, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment 
as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make such additional arrangements as may be required to 
carry out the event.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 8, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Cause No. 01-14-00930-CR

BRIDGET RENAE MILLER, * IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appellant *

*

VS. * FIRST DISTRICT

*

THE STATE OF TEXAS, *

Appellee * HOUSTON, TEXAS

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S BRIEF

Comes now BRIDGET RENAE MILLER, through her attorney of

record John J. Davis, and files this Motion For An Extension

of Time in which to file Appellant's Brief pursuant to Rules

10.5(b) and 38.6(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. In support of this Motion, Appellant shows the

Court the following:

I.

TRIAL COURT: 239th District Court of Brazoria County, Texas,

Judge Pat Sebesta, presiding.

CAUSE NUMBER: 74,2 32

STYLE: The State of Texas vs. Bridget Renae Miller

DATE OF JUDGMENT: November 10, 2014

CONVICTION (OFFENSE): Injury to a Child

SENTENCE: Ninety-nine (99) years TDCJ-ID

DEADLINE FOR FILING APPELLANT'S BRIEF: 8 April 2015

LENGTH OF TIME REQUESTED FOR EXTENSION: 18 May 2015

(40 days)

NUMBER OF PREVIOUS EXTENSIONS GRANTED: None

ACCEPTED

01-14-00930-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/8/2015 12:42:45 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:42:45 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
II.

REASONS FOR EXTENSION

Appellant's request for an extension is based upon the

following facts:

On March 17, 2015, Appellant's counsel completed and

submitted a brief to this Court in Docket Number 01-14-00727-

CR styled Alphonso Smith vs. The State of Texas.

The record in the instant case is comprised of sixteen

(16) volumes, 9 of which are reporter's record and seven (7)

of which are exhibts. The trial itself constitutes 1162 pages

excluding exhibits.

In addition to this brief, this attorney is the defense

counsel for the Brazoria County Drug Court which meets every

week and requires additional time for client conferences.

Counsel is also the appointed defense counsel at probation

reviews in the 149th and 239th District Courts as well as the

appointed defense counsel for the jail dockets in County

Court at Law Number 1 of Brazoria County. The length of this

record coupled with the settings and requirements of the drug

court and the review and jail dockets have resulted in

Counsel being unable to finish the brief by the stated

deadline.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays the

Court grant this MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

APPELLANT'S BRIEF and extend the time for filing the Brief

until 18 May 2015.
Respectfully submitted,

/s/ John J. Davis

John J. Davis

P.O. Box 787

2 05 N. Chenango

Angleton, Texas 77516-0787

SBN 05515500

Telephone: (979) 849-4362

d.attorne@sbcglobal.net

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the

above MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S BRIEF

was served to:

Jeri Yenne

Criminal District Attorney

Brazoria County Courthouse

111 East Locust, Suite 408A

Angleton, Texas 77515

ATTENTION: David Bosserman

VIA FACSIMILE (979) 864-1525

on the 8th day of April 2015

/s/ John J. Davi:

John J. Davis

Attorney for Appellant
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-50238

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAQUEL ESQUIVEL,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:07-CR-1065-7

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raquel Esquivel has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Esquivel has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 21, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-50238 Document: 00513882796 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
No. 16-50238

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-50238 Document: 00513882796 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 95 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 95

  Expressing the sense of the Congress that State agencies and other 
 providers of foster care services should make every effort to ensure 
             siblings remain together in the foster system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 2020

Ms. Kuster of New Hampshire (for herself, Mrs. Hartzler, Ms. Bass, and 
  Mr. Bacon) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress that State agencies and other 
 providers of foster care services should make every effort to ensure 
             siblings remain together in the foster system.

Whereas sibling relationships are important and should be recognized and 
        respected;
Whereas sibling relationships provide needed continuity and stability during a 
        child's placement in foster care;
Whereas the sibling bond is unique and separate from the parent-child bond, and 
        may include relations with people not linked by blood;
Whereas siblings share similar history, heritage, culture, and often biology;
Whereas the Fostering Connections to Success and Promoting Adoption Act of 2008 
        (Public Law 110-351) requires that States place siblings removed from 
        their home in the same foster care, kinship guardianship, or adoptive 
        placement, unless the State documents that such a joint placement would 
        be contrary to the safety or well-being of any of the siblings;
Whereas, in a case where siblings are removed from their home and not placed 
        jointly, the State is to provide for their frequent visitation or 
        interaction, unless the State documents that such a joint placement 
        would be contrary to the safety or well-being of any of the siblings;
Whereas sibling separation is a significant and distinct loss that must be 
        ameliorated by frequent and regular contact; and
Whereas every foster child deserves the right to know and be actively involved 
        in their siblings' lives absent extraordinary circumstances: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that State agencies and other 
providers of foster care services should--
            (1) make every effort to ensure that children are placed in 
        homes with their siblings;
            (2) ensure that siblings who are not placed together are 
        provided with ample opportunities to communicate with each 
        other and remain connected; and
            (3) in a case where siblings are not placed jointly, 
        document the reasons why.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 15.2**

 

IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm’s Consent

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthis Shell Company Report of Ambipar Emergency Response on Form 20-F of our report dated April 14, 2022, which includes an explanatoryparagraph as to the ability of HPX Corp. to continue as a going concern, with respect to our audits of the financial statements of HPXCorp. as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the year ended December 31, 2021 and for the period from March 20, 2020 (inception) throughDecember 31, 2020, appearing in Amendment No. 2 to the Form F-4 Registration Statement of Ambipar Emergency Response (File No. 333-268795)filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 30, 2023. We also consent to the reference to our firm under the heading “Statement by Experts” in this Shell Company Report on Form 20-F.

 

/s/ Marcum llp

 

Marcum llp

New York, NY

March 7, 2023