[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-13369

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

District Court No. 9:14-cv-80452-WJZ

RANDALL WHITE,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

NICHOLAS APOSTOL, THOMAS DOWDA,

KENNETH TODERO, MARC ROMAN,

BRIAN CHAMBERLAIN, STEVEN MARTINS,

ROBERT HERRIMAN, SCOTT WARMACK,

JAMES SPRITZER, ROCHELLE ALTHOLTZ,

DALE SCHULTZ, CAROL SCHULTZ,

PATRICIA LEONARD, HAMISH BROWNIE,

MYLES SAVERY, PATRICIA BENTON LEE,

MALGORZATA NAPIERACZ, 

TAYLOR VITITOW, STAGE PROPERTIES LLC,

PATRICK KELLY, DAVID LAUR, 

PAMELA LAUR, ALAN PISCATELLI,

Plaintiffs,

 versus

BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

and its undisclosed loan origination and securitization

partners, including their successors, assigns or agents

including but not limited to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as

Case: 14-13369 Date Filed: 04/07/2015 Page: 1 of 4 
2

Trustee for the Certificateholders of Banc of America

Alternative Loan Trust 2005-2 Mor,

BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY,

as successor in interest ot BankAtlantic and its

undisclosed loan origination and securitization partners,

including their successors, assigns or agents,

CITIBANK, N.A.

as assignee of American Brokers Conduit and its 

undisclosed loan origination and securitization partners,

including their successors, assigns or agents including

but not limited to Citibank, N.A., as Trustee for American

Home Mortgage Assets Trust 2006-3,

CITIMORTGAGE, INC.,

Successor by merger to ABN Ambro Mortgage Group, Inc., 

and its undisclosed loan origination and securitization

partners, including their successors, assigns or agents

including but not limited to Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation,

COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.,

and its undisclosed loan origination and securitization partners,

including their successors, assigns or agents including but not limited

to The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York as Trustee

for the Certificateholders CWMBS, Inc., CHL Mortga,

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et al.,

 Defendants,

GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC.,

And its undisclosed loan origination and securitization partners,

Including their successors, assigns or agents, including but not

Limited to Federal National Mortgage Association,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Florida

_______________

(April 7, 2015)

Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

Case: 14-13369 Date Filed: 04/07/2015 Page: 2 of 4 
3

PER CURIAM:

In his amended complaint, Randall White alleged that in January 2005, he

gave Green Point Mortgage Funding, Inc., a note in the principal amount of 

$232,000 secured by a mortgage on real property in Jupiter, Florida; that Green 

Point appraised the property at $290,000; and that the Palm Beach County 

Appraisal Report indicated that the actual value of the property was $138,000. The 

amended complaint contains three claims against Green Point. Two are relevant 

here as claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act 

(“RICO”). More specifically, Counts II and III allege that Green Point is liable for 

the inflated property appraisal under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c)–(d). 

Green Point moved the District Court to dismiss White’s amended complaint 

on the ground that the RICO claims were barred by the four-year statute of 

limitations. Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Assocs., Inc., 483 U.S. 143, 

156, 107 S. Ct. 2759, 2767, 97 L. Ed. 2d 121 (1987) (“[W]e conclude that . . . the 

federal policies that lie behind RICO and the practicalities of RICO litigation make 

the selection of the 4-year statute of limitations for Clayton Act actions, 15 U.S.C. 

§ 15b, the most appropriate limitations period for RICO actions.”). The District 

Court, in an order entered on June 26, 2014, agreed that the claims were timebarred and dismissed White’s claims with prejudice.

Case: 14-13369 Date Filed: 04/07/2015 Page: 3 of 4 
4

White appeals. We affirm. We note that White did not oppose Green 

Point’s motion to dismiss. As a general rule, a party presented with a motion to 

dismiss “must proffer some legal basis to support his cause of action.” Cnty. of 

McHenry v. Ins. Co. of the West, 438 F.3d 813, 818 (7th Cir. 2006). And 

“[a]rguments raised for the first time on appeal are not properly before this Court.” 

Hurley v. Moore, 233 F.3d 1295, 1297 (11th Cir. 2000). The arguments White 

presents in support of the timeliness of his claims were not presented to the District 

Court. We therefore do not consider them. 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 14-13369 Date Filed: 04/07/2015 Page: 4 of 4