SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST (in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V)

SIP Submitted by: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection on behalf of Allegheny County Health Department

Date Submitted: January 15, 2014 Subject: Outdoor Wood

- Fired Boiler regulations

Completeness Review Completed by: Ellen Schmitt Date Completed: 1/27/14

Administrative Materials ACCEPTABLE

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision

thereof. 1. Yes, l etter dated January 3, 2014 from E. Christopher Abruzzo, Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Environmental

Protection to Diana Esher, Direc tor.

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, or consent agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date. 2. Yes, t he State has submitted evidence that the regulations were adopted and approved in final form on May 29, 2013

, with an effective date of June 8, 2013

.

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the plan. 3. Allegheny County Health Department has the legal authority to enforce laws relating to public health within Allegheny County under the Local Health Administration Law, Act 315 of August 24, 1951, P.L. 1304, as amended and administer a local air pollution program approved by PADEP in

accordance with Section 12 of the Air Pollution Control Act 35

P.S. Section 4012.

4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official

State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable 4. Yes, a let ter dated January 3, 2014, transmitting the SIP revision including the Certification of Approval and Adoption. The regulations were adopted on May 2, 2012, enacted May 22, 2013, approved May 29, 2013, and became effective on June 8,

2013.EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself.

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. 5. Yes, a ll of the necessary documentation was included in the

submittal.

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including the date of publication of such notice. 6. Yes, Proof of Publication provided showing that the notice of public hearing was published in the Pittsburg P ost

- Gazette

on December 15, 2011.

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with the information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 7. Yes, the signed Certification of Hearing shows that a public hearing was held on January 19, 2012.

8. Compilation of public comments and the State ’ s response thereto. 8. Yes, a summary of comments and responses was provided; a

total of 42 comments were received.

Technical Support

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. This submittal consists of the adoption (incorporating by reference) of PADEP’s Outdoor Wood

- Fired Boiler regulations

and relevant definitions for the control of emissions of fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 )

.

2. Identification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). 2. N/A

3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current

actual emissions from affected sources or, wh ere appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations of the differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result

of the revision. 3. N/AEPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

4. The State ’ s demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. 4. N/A

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of

models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis. 5. N/A

6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology. 6. N/A

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary, to ensure emission levels. 7. The regulation provides notice and recordkeeping requirements at the time of sale.

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how compliance will be determined in practice. 8. Through a response to comment ACHD states that, “The ACHD regularly implements effective enforcement of all

Article XXI regulations, and expects to do the same with the proposed new OWB regulations. ”

9. Special economic and technological justifications required by any applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, explain why.) 9

. N/A

10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation. 10. N/A