alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Exhibit 32

Section 1350
Certifications

---

# Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of CommunitySouth Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company), each certify that, to his knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed
               with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
               Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  Aug 11, 2006 |  | By:   /s/  C. Allan Ducker, III
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|                    |  | C. Allan Ducker, III           
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer        

|Date:  Aug 11, 2006 |  | By:   /s/ John W. Hobbs
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                    |  | John W. Hobbs          
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

# AGENCY:

National Endowment for the Humanities.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given that the Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities will hold a meeting of the Arts and Artifacts International Indemnity Panel. The purpose of the meeting is for panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendation on applications for Certificates of Indemnity submitted to the Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities, for exhibitions beginning after July 1, 2012.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 8, 2012, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The location of the meeting is the Old Post Office Building, 1100 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20506, in Room 730.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lisette Voyatzis, Committee Management Officer, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20506, or call (202) 606-8322. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter may be obtained by contacting the National Endowment for the Humanities' TDD terminal at (202) 606-8282.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Because the meeting will consider proprietary financial and commercial data provided in confidence by indemnity applicants, and material that is likely to disclose trade secrets or other privileged or confidential information, and because it is important to keep the values of objects to be indemnified, and the methods of transportation and security measures confidential, I have determined that that the meeting will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(4) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code. I have made this determination under the authority granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority to Close Advisory Committee Meetings, dated July 19, 1993.

Dated: April 10, 2012.

Lisette Voyatzis,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-8992 Filed 4-13-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Business Development
      Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") certifies that the quarterly report on Form
      10-QSB of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 and information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      May
      12, 2006








/s/
      Shu Keung Chui


Shu
      Keung
      Chui


Chief
      Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Business Development Solutions Inc. and will be retained by Business Development
      Solutions Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
391 A.2d 704

#### Commonwealth v. Whalen, Appellant.

Submitted September 12,1977.

Lester L. Greevy, Jr., for appellant; Gailey C. Keller, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Exhibit 32.2

Certificate:

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

OF GRAY PEAKS, INC.

I, the undersigned, being the one of the Co-Chief
Executive Officers, respectively, of Gray Peaks, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best of his information, knowledge and belief, that (1) the Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)) and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 17, 2007



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/ Bary Bertiger                
|Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1








I, Susan B. Sheffield, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2023-1  (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Citibank, N.A.








By:/s/ Susan B. SheffieldName:Susan B. SheffieldTitle:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:March 4, 2024
EX-10.1


  Exhibit 10.1

  REV GROUP, INC.

  2016 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

   

  PERFORMANCE SHARE UNIT AWARD AMENDMENT

  June 2, 2022

  Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the attached grant letter dated March 23, 2020 (the “Grant Letter”) and its Exhibit A (the Grant Letter and Exhibit A constituting the “Agreement”), REV Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), granted you as of the Grant Date an award of Performance Share Units (the “Award”).  The Award was granted under and is subject to the REV Group, Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).  Unless defined in this Amendment, capitalized terms shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Plan.  This Performance Share Unit Award Amendment (the “Amendment”) revises the Agreement as described below, and the defined term “Agreement” will include any amendments made by this Amendment.  The provisions of the Plan shall control in the event of a conflict among the provisions of the Plan, this Amendment and any descriptive materials provided to you.

   

  You and the Company agree to the following amendment of the Award Terms in the Grant Letter:

   

  a)The PERFORMANCE PERIOD section of the Grant Letter is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:    


   

  	
	PERFORMANCE PERIOD: The Performance Period will begin on the Grant Date and end on October 31, 2024.



   

   

  Except as set forth in this Amendment, the Agreement is unaffected and shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.  For the avoidance of doubt, this Amendment does not affect the vesting and distribution of PSUs that occurred prior to the date hereof.

   

   

  	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. 

  1

   

  

   

  		
	            REV GROUP, INC.

	 
	By:  /s/ Christopher Daniels 

	 
	Name: Christopher Daniels
Chief Human Resources Officer

	 
	 
    /s/ Rodney N. Rushing 

	 
	    Name: Rodney N. Rushing
    Date:  June 2, 2022



  Attachment to Performance Share Unit Award Amendment

   

  [SEE ATTACHED]

   

   

  2
KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                STATEMENTS RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                ------------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                        Three Months Ended             Six Months Ended
                                                        December 31, 2004             December 31, 2004
                                                       -------------------         --------------------
                                                        (In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

<S>                                                       <C>                           <C>
Income available to common stockholders                     $   3,192                    $   6,988

Weighted average shares outstanding                            10,000                    $  10,000

Basic earnings per share                                    $  319.20                    $  698.80

Income for diluted earnings per share                       $   3,192                    $   6,988

Total weighted average common shares and equivalents
outstanding for diluted computation                            10,000                       10,000

Diluted earnings per share                                  $  319.20                    $  698.80

</TABLE>
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 02-10033

Summary Calendar

MARK ALLEN SMITH,

Petitioner-Appellant,

VERSUS

JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division

(4:01-CV-230-Y)

January 3, 2003

Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Petitioner Mark Allen Smith appeals the district court’s

denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus pursuant

to a certificate of appealability granted by our court in an order

dated June 6, 2002. Smith argues that his procedural due process
rights were violated when the state failed to give him notice that

it sought to use a pending driving while intoxicated charge to

prevent him from being assigned to an Intermediate Secure Facility

(ISF) after revocation of parole. We now affirm the district

court’s denial of habeas relief.

We review the district court’s denial of petitioner’s habeas

application de novo as to questions of law and for clear error as

to factual findings. Dyer v. Johnson, 108 F.3d 607, 609 (5th Cir.

1997). Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act

(AEDPA) the district court may grant petitions for habeas corpus on

claims adjudicated on the merits in state court only where the

state determination was “contrary to” or an “unreasonable

application of” clearly established federal law as determined by

the Supreme Court. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). A § 2254 applicant may

also obtain relief on a claim adjudicated on the merits in state

court if the claim “resulted in a decision that was based on an

unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence

presented in the State court proceeding.” § 2254(d)(2).

Here petitioner complains that his rights under Morrissey v.

Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 488-89 (1972) were violated when the state

failed to give him notice of evidence it sought to use to deny him

post-revocation incarceration at an ISF. As the U.S. Supreme Court

has made clear since Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215, 224 (1976),

however, no due process rights arise in respect to a state’s choice

of incarceration facility, even though “the degree of confinement
in one prison may be quite different from that in another.”

Accordingly, the state’s failure to give notice of evidence it

would use to choose the incarceration facility does not raise any

due process constitutional concerns.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Respondent’s

motion to supplement the record is DENIED.

AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 644 

Recognizing the significant contribution of the Country Music Association 

and designating September 25, 2018, ‘‘Country Music Association Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2018 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself and Mr. KAINE) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the significant contribution of the Country Music 

Association and designating September 25, 2018, ‘‘Country Music Association Day’’. 

Whereas the Country Music Association was founded in 1958 

as the first not-for-profit trade organization to promote 

a genre of music; 

Whereas the organization began with 160 members and has 

grown to more than 7,400 industry professionals around 

the world, representing every aspect of the business— 

(1) to guide the evolution of country music; and 

(2) to provide unity of purpose within the industry; 

Whereas the long-standing mission of the Country Music Association is to heighten the awareness of country music 

around the world and to support the continued growth of 

country music by recognizing excellence in the genre and 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 644 ATS 

serving as a repository for critical and timely information 

and communication, all while providing a forum for industry leadership; 

Whereas country music is the story of the United States, one 

that celebrates everyday life, evoking celebration and 

pain, joy and sorrow, love and loss, and connecting those 

near and far, in the United States and across the globe; 

Whereas the preservation by the Country Music Association 

of the uniquely rich heritage and time-honored traditions 

of country music continues to lead the advancement of 

country music; 

Whereas the Country Music Association Foundation, the philanthropic arm of the Country Music Association established in 2011, is committed to improving and sustaining 

music education programs across the United States, having invested more than $21,000,000 through the date of 

adoption of this resolution; 

Whereas, in 2018, the Country Music Association celebrates 

60 years of honoring the success of its leaders and professionals and its unique ability— 

(1) to embrace risks and change; and 

(2) to bring a sense of unity to the genre and the 

country music community; and 

Whereas the people of the United States recognize the excellence of the Country Music Association: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate recognizes the significant 

2 contributions of the Country Music Association over 60 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 644 ATS 

1 years and designates September 25, 2018, as ‘‘Country 

2 Music Association Day’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

747 CA 11-01131 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, PERADOTTO, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ALEX G. SCHMIDT, ALSO KNOWN AS ALEXANDER GEORGE SCHMIDT, DECEASED.

----------------------------------------------- ANN L. MCLAUGHLIN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; ORDER THOMAS E. WEBB, JR., AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ALEX G. SCHMIDT, ALSO KNOWN AS ALEXANDER GEORGE SCHMIDT, DECEASED, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

DAMON MOREY LLP, BUFFALO (GREGORY ZINI OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
JOSEPH G. MAKOWSKI, BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. FLAHERTY OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Erie County (Barbara Howe, S.), entered March 15, 2011. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the motion of petitioner for a protective order with respect to certain interrogatories.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision by the Surrogate.

Entered: June 8, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 35.1





Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.








This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 2.9 (c) of the 2023-2 Servicing Supplement dated as of April 2, 2023 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Automobile Leasing Trust 2023-2 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and GMF Leasing LLC in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.  I further certify as follows:





1. I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from May 17, 2023 through December 31, 2023, and its performance under the Agreement.





2. To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.








AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.





By:/s/ Connie CoffeyDated:March 4, 2024Connie CoffeyExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
Exhibit 2.1  LOGO NUMBER Noco-Noco Inc. SHARES CERT.9999 *******9,000,000,000******* INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE CAYMAN
ISLANDS $0.0001 PAR VALUE ORDINARY SHARES CUSIP 999999ZZ9 ORDINARY SHARES THIS CERTIFIES THAT * SPECIMEN * Is The Owner of * NINE BILLION AND 00/100 * FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF ORDINARY SHARES OF Noco-Noco Inc. Transferable on the
books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. Dated: JANUARY 01, 2009
COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: VSTOCK TRANSFER, LLC Transfer Agent and Registrar By:____________________________ Chief Executive Officer AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

JAMES LINCOLN STRONG,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 911 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-11213

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PATRICK RYNARD BANKS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:98-CR-298-2-D

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Patrick Rynard Banks has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Banks has received a

copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but has filed no response. 

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.