### Name: Glenn Brannen

Title: Preformance Group Company: South Carolina Electric and Gas Sign Date: 8/3/2010 Name: Mark Looney Title: President Company: Environmental Source Samplers, Inc Sign Date: 8/3/2010 Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date Final Test Report for

/ / Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information in this test report are true, accurate, and complete. I have reviewed all testing details and results in this test report and hereby certify that the test report is authentic and accurate.

Saturday, February 12, 2011 Page 1 of 17

### 8/3/2010

Facility Information:
COPE
405 TEAMWORK DRIVE

Cope SC 29038 Contact: Glenn Brannen Phone: 803-217-9690 Fax: Email: GBRANNEN@scana.com Testing Company: Environmental Source Samplers, Inc 436 Raleigh Street

Wilmington NC 28412 Contact: Mark Looney Phone: 910-799-1055 Fax: 910-799-1056 Email: mark@essknowsair.com

Air Permit Number: Permitted Source ID/Name: COPE UNIT 1 COP1 Permitted Maximum Process Rate: Max. Normal Operation Process Rate: Target Process Test Rate

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or process flow diagram: A primary and redundant CEMS exists at the stack sampling location. The unit is designed to monitor flowrate (WSCFM), SO2 (wet PPM), NOX (wet PPM), and CO2 (wet %). A NOX lb/MMBTU calculation is performed by the CEMS software, using CO2 as the diluent.
A solo CEMS exists for the SO2 and CO2 scrubber inlet measurements. Using time sharing, the single monitors are able to sample from both of the inlet ducts. The units are designed to sample from both of the inlet ducts. The units are designed to monitor SO2 (wet ppm) and CO2 (wet %). A SO2 lb/mmbtu calculation is performed by the CEMS software, using CO2 as the diluent. This lb/mmbtu calculation is also reported for the SO2 and CO2 measured by the Part 75 system in the stack. Industry/SCC/NAIS

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information: AFS #: FRS #:

SCC / Description 10100203 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal - Cyclone Furnace (Bituminous Coal)

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location Round

Duct Diam. Distance from upstream dist. Distance from

downstream dist. Number of

Traverse Ports Equiv. Diam Min.Travers Points Rect. Duct Length /Width COP1 288 2547.6 3174 4 0 3 0 0

Target Parameter Test Method Number of

Test Runs Test Run

Duration Sample

Points Comments Location Carbon Monoxide Method 10 3 180 0 COP1



### Saturday, February 12, 2011 Page 2 of 17

### 8/3/2010

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation of request AND approval, including dates.
No Modification

Total organic compounds (TOC) as Propane Method 25A 3 180 0 COP1

Inorganic (Aqueous)

Condensible Part. OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 COP1

Filterable PM2.5 OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 COP1 Filterable PM2.5 - PM10 OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 COP1 Total PM2.5 OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 COP1 Filterable PM10 OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 COP1 Filterable Particulate OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 COP1 Organic Condensible

Particulate OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 COP1

Total Particulate OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 COP1 Manganese Method 29 3 240 0 COP1 Antimony Method 29 3 240 0 COP1 Beryllium Method 29 3 240 0 COP1 Cadmium Method 29 3 240 0 COP1 Chromium Method 29 3 240 0 COP1 Cobalt Method 29 3 240 0 COP1 Lead Method 29 3 240 0 COP1 Nickel Method 29 3 240 0 COP1 Selenium Method 29 3 240 0 COP1 Mercury Method 29 3 240 0 COP1 Arsenic Method 29 3 240 0 COP1 Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 180 0 COP1 O2 Method 3A O2 3 180 0 COP1



### Saturday, February 12, 2011 Page 3 of 17

### 8/3/2010

Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary



### Location COP1 - Method 10 Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time
Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Fuel Type
Fw
Fc



### Location COP1 - Method 25A Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time
Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Fuel Type
Fw
Fc



### Saturday, February 12, 2011 Page 4 of 17

### 8/3/2010

Location COP1 - Method 29 Average Run Number 1 2 3
Test Date 6/8/2010 6/8/2010 6/8/2010 Run Start Time 9:50:00 AM 2:50:00 PM 12:15:00 AM
Run Finish Time 2:20:00 PM 7:15:00 PM 7:40:00 PM Net Run Time, minutes 240 240 240 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 168.896 169.256 168.918 169.023 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 11.48 11.09 10.62 11.063 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 40.32 38.89 38.51 39.240 Carbon Dioxide, % 12.56 12.68 12.6 12.613 Oxygen, % 6.92 6.9 6.97 6.930 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 169.52 167.94 167.52 168.327 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 955,123.4 960,815.8 964,912.2 960,283.800 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 1,289,037.2 1,288,222.9 1,286,051.4 1,287,770.50 0 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 97.0 96.6 96.0 96.533 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000
Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000
Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000



### Location COP1 - Method 3A CO2 Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time
Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Fuel Type
Fw
Fc



### Saturday, February 12, 2011 Page 5 of 17

### 8/3/2010

Location COP1 - Method 3A O2 Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time
Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Fuel Type
Fw
Fc



### Location COP1 - OTM - 27/28 Average Run Number
Test Date Run Start Time
Run Finish Time Net Run Time, minutes Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2
Fw
Fc



### Saturday, February 12, 2011 Page 6 of 17

### 8/3/2010

Emissions Summary



### Location: COP1 - Method 10 Compound: Carbon Monoxide Average Run 1 2 3 lb/mmBtuO2 1.30E-02 6.31E-03 3.50E-03 0.008 ppm 1.23E+01 5.95E+00 3.28E+00 7.177 ppm@7%O2 1.22E+01 5.91E+00 3.27E+00 7.127



### Location: COP1 - Method 25A Compound: Total organic compounds (TOC) as Average Run 1 2 3 lb/mmBtuO2 1.21E-03 3.26E-02 3.87E-03 0.013 ppm 7.20E-01 1.95E+01 2.31E+00 7.510 ppm@7%O2 7.16E-01 1.94E+01 2.31E+00 7.475



### Location: COP1 - Method 29 Compound: Antimony Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.000889 0.0013605 0.000351 0.001 lb/mmBtuO2 1.70E-07 2.59E-07 6.72E-08 0.000 

### Compound: Arsenic Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.000731 0.000531 0.000523 0.001 lb/mmBtuO2 1.40E-07 1.01E-07 1.00E-07 0.000 

### Compound: Beryllium Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.000084 0.00005 0.00005 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 1.60E-08 9.51E-09 9.58E-09 0.000 

### Compound: Cadmium Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.000332 0.0002745 0.00024 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 6.34E-08 5.22E-08 4.60E-08 0.000 

### Compound: Chromium Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.00549 0.003321 0.00411 0.004 lb/mmBtuO2 1.05E-06 6.32E-07 7.87E-07 0.000 

### Compound: Cobalt Average RunNumber 1 2 3



### Saturday, February 12, 2011 Page 7 of 17

### 8/3/2010 Mass_mg 0.000459 0.000548 0.000206 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 8.76E-08 1.04E-07 3.95E-08 0.000 

### Compound: Lead Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.001143 0.000904 0.001611 0.001 lb/mmBtuO2 2.18E-07 1.72E-07 3.09E-07 0.000 

### Compound: Manganese Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.0237 0.32257 0.02835 0.125 lb/mmBtuO2 4.52E-06 6.13E-05 5.43E-06 0.000 

### Compound: Mercury Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.000078 0.000917 0.000116 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 1.49E-08 1.74E-07 2.22E-08 0.000 

### Compound: Nickel Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.0062 0.002835 0.00318 0.004 lb/mmBtuO2 1.18E-06 5.39E-07 6.09E-07 0.000 

### Compound: Selenium Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 0.000657 0.0006 0.0006 0.001 lb/mmBtuO2 1.25E-07 1.14E-07 1.15E-07 0.000



### Location: COP1 - OTM - 27/28 Compound: Filterable Particulate Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 6.3 14.2 6.2 8.900 lb/mmBtuO2 2.57E-03 5.79E-03 2.49E-03 0.004 

### Compound: Filterable PM10 Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 1.5 1.3 2 1.600 lb/mmBtuO2 6.11E-04 5.30E-04 8.02E-04 0.001 

### Compound: Filterable PM2.5 Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 1.1 2.5 4.1 2.567 lb/mmBtuO2 4.48E-04 1.02E-03 1.65E-03 0.001



### Saturday, February 12, 2011 Page 8 of 17

### 8/3/2010

Process Run Data Compound: Filterable PM2.5 - PM10 Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 3.8 10.5 0.2 4.833 lb/mmBtuO2 1.55E-03 4.28E-03 8.02E-05 0.002 

### Compound: Inorganic (Aqueous) Condensible Pa Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 46.8 47.8 49 47.867 lb/mmBtuO2 1.91E-02 1.95E-02 1.97E-02 0.019 

### Compound: Organic Condensible Particulate Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 27.6 28.8 9.8 22.067 lb/mmBtuO2 1.12E-02 1.17E-02 3.93E-03 0.009 

### Compound: Total Particulate Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 80.7 90.8 65 78.833 lb/mmBtuO2 3.29E-02 3.70E-02 2.61E-02 0.032 

### Compound: Total PM2.5 Average RunNumber 1 2 3 Mass_mg 75.5 79.1 62.9 72.500 lb/mmBtuO2 3.08E-02 3.23E-02 2.52E-02 0.029



### Saturday, February 12, 2011 Page 9 of 17

### 8/3/2010

Process Run Data

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data 

### Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value 1 Average Heat Input 3372.8 MMBtu/hr M29/OTM27%28/ M3A/M10/M316/ M26 Run 1 6/8/201 09:50 - 14:20 0



### 2 Average Heat Input 3357.9 MMBtu/hr M29/OTM27%28/ M3A/M10/M316/ M26 Run 2 6/8/2010 14:50 - 19:15 0

3 Average Heat Input 3229.6 MMBtu/hr M29/OTM27%28/ M3A/M10/M316/ M26 Run 1 6/8/201 19:40 - 00:15 0

1 Unit Gross Electical Output 396.1 MW M29/OTM27%28/ M3A/M10/M316/ M26 Run 1 6/8/2010 09:50 - 14:20 0

2 Unit Gross Electical Output 396.1 MW M29/OTM27%28/ M3A/M10/M316/ M26 Run 2 6/8/2010 14:50 - 19:15 0

3 Unit Gross Electical Output 378.7 MW M29/OTM27%28/ M3A/M10/M316/ M26 Run 1 6/8/201 19:40 - 00:15 0

Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value 

### 1 BAGHOUSE 0 0

Run Name Value UOM Comments 1 Fuel Higher Heating Value 12689 Btu/lb 2 Fuel Higher Heating Value 12216 Btu/lb 

### 3 Fuel Higher Heating Value 12707 Btu/lb 1 Fuel Moisture 4.518 % 2 Fuel Moisture 6.161 % 3 Fuel Moisture 4.391 %



### Saturday, February 12, 2011 Page 10 of 17

### 8/3/2010

1 Fuel Mercury Content 0.08 ug/g 

### 2 Fuel Mercury Content 0.08 ug/g 3 Fuel Mercury Content 0.07 ug/g 1 Fuel Cadmium Content 0.2 ug/g 2 Fuel Cadmium Content 0.2 ug/g 

### 3 Fuel Cadmium Content 0.2 ug/g 1 Fuel Nickel Content 14 ug/g 2 Fuel Nickel Content 15 ug/g 

### 3 Fuel Nickel Content 13 ug/g 1 Fuel Arsenic Content 5 ug/g 2 Fuel Arsenic Content 4 ug/g 3 Fuel Arsenic Content 5 ug/g 

### 1 Fuel Chromium Content 19 ug/g 2 Fuel Chromium Content 21 ug/g 3 Fuel Chromium Content 16 ug/g 

### 1 Fuel Beryllium Content 2.2 ug/g 2 Fuel Beryllium Content 2.3 ug/g 3 Fuel Beryllium Content 1.9 ug/g 1 Fuel Lead Content 7 ug/g 

### 2 Fuel Lead Content 8 ug/g 3 Fuel Lead Content 6 ug/g 1 Fuel Manganese Content 12 ug/g 

### 2 Fuel Manganese Content 12 ug/g 3 Fuel Manganese Content 13 ug/g 1 Fuel Chlorine Content 960 ug/g 2 Fuel Chlorine Content 930 ug/g 

### 3 Fuel Chlorine Content 720 ug/g 1 Fuel Fluorine Content 79 ug/g 2 Fuel Fluorine Content 75 ug/g 

### 3 Fuel Fluorine Content 69 ug/g

Saturday, February 12, 2011 Page 11 of 17

### 8/3/2010

Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail



### Location COP1 - Method 10 Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type Fw Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units



### Saturday, February 12, 2011 Page 12 of 17

### 8/3/2010

Location COP1 - Method 25A Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type Fw Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units



### Saturday, February 12, 2011 Page 13 of 17

### 8/3/2010

Location COP1 - Method 29 Average Run Number 1 2 3 Test Date 6/8/2010 6/8/2010 6/8/2010 Run Start Time 9:50:00 AM 2:50:00 PM 12:15:00 AM Run Finish Time 2:20:00 PM 7:15:00 PM 7:40:00 PM Net Traversing Points 1 1 1 Net Run Time, minutes 240 240 240 Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.251 0.251 0.251 0.251 Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.0001 1.0001 1.0001 1.000 Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.9 29.9 29.9 29.900 Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 1.72 1.72 1.72 1.720 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 178.775 182.015 178.933 179.908 Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 100.93 109.88 101.35 104.053 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 168.896 169.256 168.918 169.023 Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 465.3 448.5 426.6 446.800 Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 21.90 21.11 20.08 21.030 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 11.48 11.09 10.62 11.063 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 40.32 38.89 38.51 39.240 Dry Mole Fraction 0.8852 0.8891 0.8938 0.889 Carbon Dioxide, % 12.56 12.68 12.6 12.613 Oxygen, % 6.92 6.9 6.97 6.930 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.52 80.42 80.43 80.457 Fuel Factor 1.11 1.10 1.11 Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.29 30.30 30.29 30.293 Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.88 28.94 28.98 28.933 Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.61 -0.62 -0.62 -0.617 Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.86 29.85 29.85 29.853 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 169.52 167.94 167.52 168.327 Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.599 0.601 0.6 0.600 Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 47.49 47.46 47.38 47.443 Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 452.389 452.389 452.389 452.389 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 955,123.4 960,815.8 964,912.2 960,283.800 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 1,289,037.2 1,288,222.9 1,286,051.4 1,287,770.5 00 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 97.0 96.6 96.0 96.533 Percent Excess Air, % 48.3 48.1 48.9 48.433 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000 Round Duct Diameter, inches 288 288 288 Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0 Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0 Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000 Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000



### Saturday, February 12, 2011 Page 14 of 17

### 8/3/2010

Location COP1 - Method 3A CO2 Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type Fw Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units



### Saturday, February 12, 2011 Page 15 of 17

### 8/3/2010

Location COP1 - Method 3A O2 Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Fuel Factor Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Moisture, % Analyzer Make Analyzer Model Analyzer Serial Number Operating Range Operating Units No. Readings/Avg. Calibration Set Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift Calibration Post High Cylinder ID Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift Cavg Cavg Units Cgas Cgas Units Fuel Type Fw Fc Cgasw Cgasw Units



### Saturday, February 12, 2011 Page 16 of 17

### 8/3/2010

Location COP1 - OTM - 27/28 Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Net Traversing Points Net Run Time, minutes Nozzle Diameter, inches Pitot Tube Coefficient Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf Total Moisture Liquid collected, g Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % Dry Mole Fraction Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % Fuel Factor Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % Percent Excess Air, % F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Round Duct Diameter, inches Rectangular Duct Width, inches Rectangular Duct Length, inches Fw Fc



### Saturday, February 12, 2011 Page 17 of 17