alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 83081 

# PLED
JAN / 4 2022

• A. BROWN PREPAE COURT AWA.4 1 CLERK IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA COREY B. JOHNSON, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a petition for a writ of mandamus and a petition for judicial review. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Susan Johnson, Judge.

In his petitions, appellant challenged the revocation of his parole. However, neither a petition for a writ of mandamus nor a petition for judicial review are the appropriate vehicles in which to challenge the decision to revoke parole because a petition for a writ of habeas corpus is an available legal remedy. See NRS 34.170 (providing that mandamus relief is not available when there is a plain, speedy and adequate legal remedy); NRS 34.020(2) (providing that the writ of review is not available where there is a plain, speedy and adequate remedy); see also NRS 34.360 ("Every person unlawfully committed, detained, confined or restrained of his or her liberty, under any pretense whatever, may prosecute a writ of habeas corpus to inquire into the cause of such imprisonment or restraint"); Hornback v. Warden, 97 Nev. 98, 100, 625 P.2d 83, 84 (1981) (parole 'This appeal has been submitted for decision on the record without briefing or oral argument. NRAP 340)(3), (g); see also NRAP 31(d)(1); Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975). 

## z- OttiTY SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(01 1947A 40...C.J. Parraguirre

J.

J. revocation challenge raised in petition for writ of habeas corpus). Therefore, the district court did not err in denying these petitions. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Hardesty

cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge Corey B. Johnson Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVAOA 2 (DI 1947A 44Y6).
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 10, 2015

No. 04-15-00201-CV

IN RE TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE JOINT SELF-INSURANCE FUND 

a/k/a The Texas Municipal League Intergovernmental Risk Pool

Original Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On April 6, 2015, relator filed a petition for writ of injunction. The court has considered 

relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, 

the petition for writ of injunction is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion 

will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on April 10, 2015.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 14-10-53721-CV, styled Housing Authority of the City of Alice v. Texas 

Municipal League Joint Self-Insurance Fund and Texas Municipal League Intergovernmental Risk Pool, pending in 

the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas, the David A. Sanchez presiding.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 August 9, 2006
    /s/ John R. Eckel, Jr.John R. Eckel, Jr.Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

I, Dianne M. Scheu, Senior Vice President,Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Cellu Tissue Holdings, Inc. (the“Company”) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the period ended August 25, 2005 fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     Theinformation contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | October 11,  2005                                        |   | /s/ Dianne M. Scheu |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------|--------|
|   | Dianne M.  Scheu                                              |
|   | Senior Vice  President,  Finance and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 105 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 105

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 27, 2020

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
      Permitting the remains of the Honorable John Lewis, late a 
   Representative from the State of Georgia, to lie in state in the 
                        rotunda of the Capitol.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in recognition of the long and distinguished service rendered to 
the Nation by the Honorable John Lewis, late a Representative from the 
State of Georgia, his remains shall be permitted to lie in state in the 
Rotunda of the Capitol from July 27, 2020, through July 29, 2020, and 
the Architect of the Capitol, 

              

 under the direction of the President pro tempore of the Senate and the 
Speaker of the House of Representatives, shall take all necessary steps 
for the accomplishment of that purpose.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
TypeApprovals
**Certifications**

 

 

I, Paul Vanderslice, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reportson Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this reporton Form 10-K, of BMO 2022-C3 Mortgage Trust (the “Exchange Act PeriodicReports”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports,taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicingand other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliancestatement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, andexcept as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicers havefulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all materialrespects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included asan exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably reliedon information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; ParkBridge Lender Services LLC; Computershare Trust Company, National Association;SCP Servicing LLC; KeyBank National Association; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC;Wilmington Trust, National Association; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; and 3650REIT Loan Servicing LLC.

 

 

Date: March 31, 2023

 

/s/ PaulVanderslice                                                   

Paul Vanderslice

Chief Executive Officer, BMO Commercial Mortgage SecuritiesLLC

(senior officer in charge of securitization of thedepositor)
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed 

April 9, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00233-CV

IN RE AGAR CORPORATION, INC., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

11th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2008-20480

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On Tuesday, March 17, 2015, relator Agar Corporation, Inc. filed a petition 

for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West

2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to 

compel the Honorable Mike D. Miller, presiding judge of the 11th District Court of 

Harris County, to vacate the trial court’s order denying relator’s Motion to Abate 
2

and to issue an order abating the underlying case until the appeal in a severed case 

has been exhausted.

Relator has not satisfied its burden to demonstrate its entitlement to 

mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. 

We also deny relator’s Motion for Temporary Stay of Trial Court’s Order Setting 

Trial for April 20, 2015 Docket.

 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Donovan, and Wise.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 31 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                        January 25 (legislative day, January 24), 2019.
    Resolved, That the resolution from the House of Representatives 
(H.J. Res. 31) entitled ``Joint resolution making further continuing 
appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for fiscal year 
2019, and for other purposes.'', do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the 
      following:

    The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2019 (division C of Public Law 
115-245) is further amended--
            (1) in section 105--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ``or'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in paragraph (3)--
                            (i) by inserting ``except as provided in 
                        paragraph (4),'' before ``December''; and
                            (ii) by striking the period at the end and 
                        inserting ``; or''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) with respect to appropriations and funds made 
        available, and other authorities granted, pursuant to section 
        101(5) of this joint resolution for the Department of Homeland 
        Security, February 15, 2019.''; and
            (2) in section 110, by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) With respect to mandatory payments whose budget authority was 
provided in the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 
2018 (division F of Public Law 115-141), subsections (a) and (b) shall 
be applied by substituting `section 105(4)' for `section 105(3)' each 
place it appears.''.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 31

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 72 (Friday, April 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22285-22286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8910]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XB165


Fisheries of the South Atlantic; South Atlantic Fishery 
Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting of the South Atlantic Fishery 
Management Council's Technical Shrimp Review Panel.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (SAFMC) will 
hold a meeting of its Technical Shrimp Review Panel via Webinar. See 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

DATES: The meeting will take place May 2, 2012. See SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar. The webinar is open to

[[Page 22286]]

members of the public. Those interested in participating should contact 
Kim Iverson (See FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) to request an 
invitation providing webinar access information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim Iverson, Public Information 
Officer, South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 4055 Faber Place 
Drive, Suite 201, N. Charleston, SC, 29405; telephone: (843) 571-4366 
or toll free (866) SAFMC-10; fax: (843) 769-4520; email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#741f1d195a1d021106071b1a3407151219175a1a1100"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2d46444003445b485f5e42436d5e4c4b404e03434859">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Members of the Shrimp Review Panel will meet 
via webinar from 9 a.m. until 11 a.m. on May 2, 2012. The focus of the 
meeting will be to recommend changes in the biological parameters and 
survey methods used in determining the stock abundance of pink shrimp. 
This information will be used in developing Amendment 9 to the Shrimp 
Fishery Management Plan, which includes an action for revising methods 
to be better determine the Minimum Stock Size Threshold (MSST) for pink 
shrimp.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for auxiliary aids should be directed to the Council office 
(see ADDRESSES) 3 days prior to the meeting.

    Note:  The times and sequence specified in this agenda are 
subject to change.


    Dated: April 10, 2012.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-8910 Filed 4-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 19 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 19

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
 allow Congress to limit the number of terms that Representatives and 
                          Senators may serve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

Mr. Norman submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
 allow Congress to limit the number of terms that Representatives and 
                          Senators may serve.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Congress may by law limit the number of terms that 
Representatives and Senators may serve.''.
                                 <all>
```
FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS

April 8, 2015

ABELACOSTA, CLERK

No. PDs-100-15& 101-15

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF TEXAS

OSMIN PERAZA, Appellant

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from Harris County

*****

STATE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY'S

MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL

*****

LISA C. McMINN

State Prosecuting Attorney

BarI.D.No.13803300

P.O. Box 13046

Austin, Texas 78711

information@spa.texas.gov

512/463-1660 (Telephone)

512/463-5724 (Fax)

pd-0100-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 4/7/2015 4:26:46 PM

Accepted 4/8/2015 8:27:05 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK

K ^
No. PDS-100-15& 101-15

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF TEXAS

OSMIN PERAZA, Appellant

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

*****

STATE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY'S

MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL

*****

Comes now the State ofTexas, by and through its State Prosecuting Attorney,

and respectfully submits to the Court its Motion to Substitute Counsel in the above

entitled and numbered cause.

The State's petition for discretionary review was filed by the Harris County

District Attorney, pursuant to Tex. Gov't Code § 42.005(b) (a district or county

attorney may assist the state prosecuting attorney in representing the state before the

court ofcriminal appeals). This Court granted the State's petition on March 25,2015,

and ordered the State's briefto be filed on or before April 9, 2015. The undersigned

and the Assistant Harris County District Attorney who filed the State's petition have
agreed that the State Prosecuting Attorney should file the State's brief and present

oral argument in this case.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, the State prays that its Motion to Substitute Counsel be granted

and that Lisa C. McMinn be substituted for Jessica Akins as counsel for the State.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Lisa C. McMinn

LISA C. McMINN

State Prosecuting Attorney

Bar I.D. No. 13803300

P.O. Box 13046

Austin, Texas 78711

information@spa.texas.gov

512/463-1660 (Telephone)

512/463-5724 (Fax)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on this 7th day ofApril, 2015, the State's Motion

to substitute was served electronically on:

Jessica Akins

Assistant District Attorney

1201 Franklin, 13th Floor

Houston, Texas 77002

akins_jessica@dao.hctx.net

Jani Maselli Wood

Assistant Public Defender

1201 Franklin St, 13th Floor

Houston, Texas 77002

jani.maselli@pdo.hctx.net

/s/LisaC. McMinn

LISA C. McMINN

State Prosecuting Attorney
# Exhibit 32

Section 1350
Certifications

---

# Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of CommunitySouth Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2004 as
                    filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
                    Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                         |  |                                
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------
|                         |  |                                
|Date:  November 12, 2004 |  | By:   /s/  C. Allan Ducker, III
|                         |  | C. Allan Ducker, III           
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer        

|                         |  |                         
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------
|                         |  |                         
|Date:  November 12, 2004 |  | By:   /s/  John W. Hobbs
|                         |  | John W. Hobbs           
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer
# C_2004094EN.01005001.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/50

---

Action brought on 3 February 2004 by Eugene Emile Marie Kimman against Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-44/04)

(2004/C 94/136)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 3 February 2004 by Eugene Emile Marie Kimman, residing in Overijse (Belgium), represented by Nicolas Lhoëst, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the appointing authority dated 20 December 2002 confirming the applicant's initial classification in Grade B5; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the appointing authority dated 20 December 2002 confirming the applicant's initial classification in Grade B5;

| — | In so far as necessary, annul the decision of the appointing authority of 1 October 2003 rejecting the applicant's complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

In so far as necessary, annul the decision of the appointing authority of 1 October 2003 rejecting the applicant's complaint;

| — | Order the defendant to pay all the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay all the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The contested decision confirmed the applicant's classification in Grade B5 on the date of his recruitment and, accordingly, rejected a request for reclassification introduced by the applicant following an amendment of the rules on the criteria applicable to appointment in grade and classification in step on recruitment, adopted by the Commission following the judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-17/95 (1).

1

In support of his action, the applicant claims that the Commission should have applied its decision of 6 June 1973 for the purposes of his recruitment and not the decision of 1983, which had not yet been adopted at the time.

He also relies on failure to state reasons for the contested decision, a manifest error of assessment and alleged discrimination between the applicant, whose application for reclassification was rejected, and other officials who, with the same length of professional experience as the applicant, were able to benefit from reclassification.

---

(1)  Judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 5 October 1995, published in OJ C 315, 25-11-95, p. 14.

1

---