alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Guy H. JONES and Elizabeth Jones, Appellants.

No. 76-1133.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted July 7, 1976.

Decided July 21, 1976.

Phil Stratton and Guy Jones, Jr., Conway, Ark., for appellants.

W. H. Dillahunty, U.S. Atty. and Robert L. Neighbors, Asst. U.S. Atty., Little Rock, Ark., for appellee.

*226Before BRIGHT, STEPHENSON and HENLEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Guy H. Jones of Faulkner County, Arkansas, and Elizabeth Jones, his wife, appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas1 enforcing a summons issued by an officer of the federal Internal Revenue Service.

The summons required Mr. and Mrs. Jones to appear before an officer of the Service and to testify with respect to their income tax liability for the calendar year 1972; they were also directed to produce certain documentary material.

Appellants obeyed the summons to the extent that they appeared before the Internal Revenue Agent who had issued the summons. At that time they announced both orally and by letter that they intended to rely upon their “constitutional rights and privileges.” They then took their departure. At no time did the Agent ask appellants any questions or call upon them to deliver any of the documents that they had brought with them.

Thereafter the government acting pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7604 filed an application in the district court for an order enforcing the summons. That court issued a show cause order to which appellants responded. The district court ordered that the summons be enforced. This appeal followed.

It is well settled that a person who has been summoned to appear before an Internal Revenue Agent as provided by 26 U.S.C. § 7602 may not on the basis of a general objection or claim of constitutional privilege refuse to submit to questioning by the Agent. The proper course for the individual concerned to pursue is to appear in obedience to the summons, answer all unobjectionable questions, and make specific objections to specific questions or to specific demands for the submission of particular documents. If that is done, proper review of any claims of privilege can be had in the district court. *See Russell v. United States,*524 F.2d 1152 (8th Cir. 1975); *United States v. Theep,*502 F.2d 797 (9th Cir. 1974); *United States*v. *Awerkamp,*497 F.2d 832 (7th Cir. 1974); *United States v. Malnik,*489 F.2d 682 (5th Cir. 1974); *United States v. Held,*435 F.2d 1361 (6th Cir. 1970).

Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. When appellants appear before the Agent again, they may protect their constitutional rights in the manner above indicated.

Affirmed.

1

. The Honorable Terry L. S ¡11, United States District Judge.
#### Robert J. NEWMAN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross Appellant, v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and J. I. Brown, Jr., Defendants-Appellants-Cross Appellees.

No. 75-1231.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 2, 1976.

Daniel J. O’Beirne, Jim C. Blough, Natchez, Miss., for defendants-appellants-eross appellees.

W. F. Riley, Claude Pintard, Jr., J. Walter Brown, Jr., Natchez, Miss., for plaintiffappellee-cross appellant.

Before RIVES, GOLDBERG and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

To reach a correct decision of this appeal we must have as clear an understanding as possible of the present state of the law in Mississippi applicable to crossing accidents between railroad locomotives and automobiles, such as the one here involved, and more particularly as related to the following topics of law:

> (1) What constitutes an unusual and dangerous crossing?

> (2) By what standard should the court determine the issue of negligence vel non on the part of the railroad company (a) at an ordinary crossing, (b) at an unusual and dangerous crossing?

> (3) What effect has Mississippi’s adoption of comparative negligence had on the doctrines of subsequent negligence/last clear chance/“better chance” and proximate cause?

> (4) In the event that the last clear chance doctrine (or a variant theory) is still viable in Mississippi, by what standard is it to be determined?

We need additional findings of fact and conclusions of law by the district court as to each of the above-mentioned topics. We leave optional with the district court whether any other topic should be considered, and whether or not additional evidence should be admitted or considered. The requested findings of fact and conclusions of law should be as comprehensive as possible to cover all contingencies and all arguably permissible determinations which might be made by an appellate court. Counsel for the respective parties should render diligent and skillful aid to the district court in the performance of its duty to reach and make such additional findings of fact and conclusions of law. Due notice and opportunity to be heard is, of course, required.

Accordingly, while jurisdiction of this appeal is retained by the present panel of this Court, the case is remanded to the district court for the making of the requested additional findings of fact and conclusions of law, and return of such findings and conclusions to this Court within a reasonable time and in any event within sixty days from the date of this order.

SO ORDERED.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lorena Jensen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10 QSB of Boomers' Cultural
Development, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant and I have:

d)   designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures to ensure that material
     information   relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its  consolidated
     subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us by  others  within  those  entities,
     particularly  during  the period in which  this  quarterly  report is being
     prepared;

e)   evaluated the  effectiveness  of the registrant's  disclosure  controls and
     procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the  filing  date of this
     quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

f)   presented in this report our  conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of the
     disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
     Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation,  to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's  board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

c)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the  design  or  operation  of  internal
     controls which could adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to record,
     process,  summarize and report  financial data and have  identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

d)   any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
     employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the  registrant's  internal
     controls; and

6. I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes
in  internal  controls  or in other  factors  that  could  significantly  affect
internal  controls  subsequent  to the  date  of  our  most  recent  evaluation,
including any  corrective  actions with regard to significant  deficiencies  and
material weaknesses.


Date:  October 26, 2005


By: /s/Lorena Jensen
           ---------------------
           Lorena Jensen
           Chief Financial Officer
H. Con. Res. 128 Agreed to December 21, 2020

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1520 the Clerk 

of the House of Representatives shall make the following correction: 

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘Making further continuing 

appropriations for fiscal year 2021, and for other purposes.’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8696]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute Of Allergy And Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Clinical Trial Planning 
Grants and Implementation Cooperative Agreements.
    Date: May 3, 2012.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, 3264, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Lakshmi Ramachandra, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, DEA/NIAID/NIH/DHHS, Room 2217, 
6700-B Rockledge Drive, MSC-7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-496-
2550, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#95c7f4f8f4f6fdf4fbf1e7f4f9d5fbfcf4fcf1bbfbfcfdbbf2fae3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1e4c7f737f7d767f707a6c7f725e70777f777a3070777630797168">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 4, 2012.
Anna P. Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-8696 Filed 4-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document

Exhibit 4.2

FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE
HYMC 2020 PERFORMANCE AND INCENTIVE PAY PLAN
Pursuant to Section 18.1 of the HYMC 2020 Performance and Incentive Pay Plan,  effective upon approval by holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Common Stock”) of Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), present and entitled to vote at an Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on June 2, 2022, and the approval by Board of Directors of the Corporation as of April 18, 2022, Section 4.1.1 – Share Authorization is hereby amended to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance thereunder by 12,000,000, as follows:  
“4.1.1  Share Authorization. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.3, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance to Participants under the Plan on or after the Effective Date (the “Share Authorization”) shall be 14,508,002 shares, which may be issued entirely in the form of Incentive Stock Options or through a combination of any one or more of the forms of Awards permitted under the Plan.  The shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Plan may be authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares.”
AMS Unpasteurized Liquid Whole Eggs for Further Processing Contractor Indicator Organism Performance - Fiscal Year: 20181

Standard Plate Count3/ Total Coliforms4/ 

Contractor

# Lots Produced 

(% of Total)

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit

# Exc

Critic

C1 56 (14.7)

8 14.29

2 3.57

C2 73 (19.2) 1 1.370 0 

C4 206 (54.1)

4 1.94 1 0.49 

C6 46 (12.1) 2 4.350 0 

Total 381 (100.0) 15 3.94

3 0.79

1/A full description of the unpasteurized liquid whole eggs for further processing purchase program specification is available at https://www.ams.usda.gov/selli2/Production Dates: October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018.3/Standard Plate Count Critical Limit: 50,000 CFU/g.4/Total Coliforms Critical Limit: 5,000 CFU/g.5/Generic E. coli Critical Limit: 1,000 CFU/g.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 110 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 110

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 20, 2020

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2021, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2021 (division A of Public Law 116-159) is further 
amended by striking 

              

 the date specified in section 106(3) and inserting ``December 21, 
2020''.
     This joint resolution may be cited as the ``Extension of 
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2021''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 20, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.

                               By Gloria J. Lett,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
# C_2004106EN.01001402.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/14

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 1 April 2004

in Case C-389/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg): Deutsche See-Bestattungs-Genossenschaft eG v Hauptzollamt Kiel
   (1)

Deutsche See-Bestattungs-Genossenschaft eG

Hauptzollamt Kiel

1

(‘Excise duties - Exemption from tax on mineral oils - Directive 92/81/EEC - Article 8(1)(c) - The term “navigation”’)

(2004/C 106/23)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-389/02: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Finanzgericht (Finance Court) Hamburg (Germany) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between Deutsche See-Bestattungs-Genossenschaft eG, and Hauptzollamt Kiel – on the interpretation of Article 8(1)(c) of Council Directive 92/81/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on mineral oils (OJ 1992 L 316, p. 12) – the Court (First Chamber), composed of: P. Jann, President of the Chamber, A. Rosas, A. La Pergola, R. Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur) and K. Lenaerts, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 1 April 2004, in which it ruled:

Deutsche See-Bestattungs-Genossenschaft eG

Hauptzollamt Kiel

Article 8(1)(c) of Council Directive 92/81/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on mineral oils should be interpreted to mean that the term ‘navigation within Community waters (including fishing), other than in private pleasure craft’ includes all forms of navigation, irrespective of the purpose of the voyage, when that voyage is made for commercial purposes.

---

(1)  OJ C 19 of 25.1.2003.

1

---
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 14 

Designating the George C. Marshall Museum and George C. Marshall Research Library in Lexington, Virginia, as the National George C. Marshall Museum and Library. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2019 

Mr. CLINE (for himself, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. RIGGLEMAN, and Mr. 

GRIFFITH) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Designating the George C. Marshall Museum and George 

C. Marshall Research Library in Lexington, Virginia, 

as the National George C. Marshall Museum and Library. 

Whereas General George C. Marshall served as Army Chief 

of Staff during World War II, Special Ambassador to 

China, Secretary of State, and Secretary of Defense; 

Whereas General George C. Marshall was promoted to General of the Army in 1944, one of only five Army five-star 

generals in the history of the United States; 

Whereas General George C. Marshall was awarded the Congressional Gold Medal in 1946 for his military strategy 

and vital role during World War II; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 14 IH 

Whereas General George C. Marshall was awarded the Nobel 

Peace Prize in 1953 for developing the European economic recovery strategy known as the Marshall Plan; 

Whereas the George C. Marshall Foundation was established 

in 1953 and is devoted to preserving the legacy of General George C. Marshall through educational scholarship 

programs and facilities; 

Whereas the George C. Marshall Foundation opened the 

George C. Marshall Museum and George C. Marshall Research Library in 1964 in Lexington, Virginia, on the 

post of the Virginia Military Institute, which is the alma 

mater of General George C. Marshall; 

Whereas the George C. Marshall Museum educates the public 

about the military and diplomatic contributions of General George C. Marshall through extensive exhibits; and 

Whereas the George C. Marshall Research Library maintains 

the most comprehensive collection of records documenting 

the life and leadership of General George C. Marshall: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress designates the George C. Mar3 shall Museum and George C. Marshall Research Library 

4 in Lexington, Virginia, as the National George C. Mar5 shall Museum and Library. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aurelio Resource Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Fred Warnaars, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                                                         
|------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 19, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Frederik W. Warnaars                                
|                    |  |  |  | Frederik W. Warnaars                                    
|                    |  |  |  | Interim Chief Financial Officer, Chairman, and Secretary

A signed original of this written statement is required by Section 906 has been provided to Aurelio Resource
Corporation and will be retained by Aurelio Resource Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

ALBERT LEE HESLEY,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 534 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Serge Atlan, certify that: 

  1) I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-QSB of FalconTarget, Inc.;  

  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;  

  3) Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;  

  4) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  

  a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based upon such evaluation; and  

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and  

  5) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):  

  a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information and 

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: February 15, 2008

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan 

    Serge Atlan

    Chairman