alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA), DoD.

# ACTION:

Open meeting notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

On February 28, 2012 (77 FR 12039), the Advisory Council on Dependents' Education gave notice of a meeting to be held Friday, April 20, 2012, in Vicenza, Italy, from 12 p.m. to 4 p.m., Central European Summer Time (CEST); and in Arlington, Virginia (via Video Teleconference), from 6 a.m. to 10 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time (EDT). Under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), the Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and 41 CFR 102-3.150, the Department of Defense announces that the meeting times have been changed. All other information in the notice remains the same.

# DATES:

The new meeting times are: Friday, April 20, 2012, Vicenza, Italy, from 2 p.m. to 6 p.m., Central European Summer Time (CEST); Arlington, Virginia (via Video Teleconference), from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time (EDT).

# ADDRESSES:

Caserma Ederle, Vicenza, Italy 36100; 4040 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Joel K. Hansen at (703) 588-3166 or                         *Joel.Hansen@hq.dodea.edu.*

Dated: April 11, 2012.

Aaron Siegel,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 2012-9068 Filed 4-13-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### John P. ABEL, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Respondent.

No. PC-80-232.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

May 19, 1980.

Jan Cartwright, Atty. Gen., John G. Lan-ning, Dist. Atty., Washington County, Bar-tlesville, for appellee.

Cecil G. Drummond, Pawhuska, for appellant.

*284ORDER AFFIRMING DENIAL OF POST CONVICTION RELIEF

Appellant asserts that the District Court of Washington County erred in refusing to credit prison time served under Case # 3223, which Judgment and Sentence was vacated on grounds set forth in *Edwards v. State,*Okl.Cr., 591 P.2d 313 (1979), to three sentences presently being served by Appellant. Appellant urges that this relief is mandated by *Lamb v. Page,*Okl.Cr., 482 P.2d 615 (1971). However, we are of the opinion that the order appealed from should be affirmed.

The Judgment and Sentence in Case # 3223 was imposed on the 26th day of January, 1956, and sentence was served from April 25, 1957, through December 2, 1958. The Judgment and Sentence was vacated on the 18th day of March, 1980, subsequent to Appellant’s convictions in Cases CRF-77-143, 77-542 and 77-3 on the 26th day of April, 1977 which sentences Appellant is presently serving.

The Appellant’s claim does not fall within the categories for time credit relief set forth by this Court in *Floyd v. State,*Okl. Cr., 540 P.2d 1195 (1975), and, in fact, the request, if granted, would result in the “banking of jail time” condemned as a matter of public policy in both *Floyd*and *Martin v. Page,*Okl.Cr., 484 P.2d 1319 (1971).

Therefore, being fully advised in the premises, it is the order of this Court that the order appealed from be AFFIRMED.

WITNESS OUR HANDS, and the Seal of this Court, this 19th day of May, 1980.

TOM R. CORNISH, P. J.

TOM BRETT, J.

HEZ J. BUSSEY, J.
#### Robert M. SCHMIT, Appellant, v. William M. STEWART and Lahoma Fleshman, Appellees.

No. 4084.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

Oct. 12, 1979.

A. Lee Petersen, Anchorage, for appellant.

Jerry E. Melcher, Timothy R. Byrnes, Hughes, Thorsness, Gantz, Powell & Brun-din, Anchorage, for appellees.

Before CONNOR, BOOCHEVER, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ., and DIMOND, Senior Justice.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

In the superior court the appellant, Robert Schmit, unsuccessfully sought rescission of a real estate conveyance on grounds of fraud, undue influence, duress, or mistake, and incompetence to contract. Schmit contends on appeal that the jury’s answers to special interrogatories, upon which judgment was entered, were fatally inconsistent. We affirm the judgment.

To give effect to the jury trial right in civil cases, a court must determine, by examining the pleadings, instructions, arguments, and evidence, whether there is a logical view of the case that harmonizes what seems at first to be an inconsistent verdict. *City of Whittier v. Whittier Fuel and Marine Corp.,*577 P.2d 216, 225 (Alaska 1978); *City of Homer v. Land’s End Marine,*459 P.2d 475, 478 (Alaska 1969).1 In this case, notwithstanding its findings with respect to the circumstances in which the contract was entered into, the jury found that Schmit subsequently ratified the contract. Since there is nothing inherently contradictory about these findings, and there is a logical view of the evidence supporting the finding of ratification, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

RABINOWITZ, C. J., not participating.

1

. See *also Atlantic and Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.,*369 U.S. 355, 364, 82 S.Ct. 780, 786, 7 L.Ed.2d 798, 807 (1962); *Fugitt v. Jones,*549 F.2d 1001, 1005 (5th Cir. 1977); *Cote v. Estate of Butler,*518 F.2d 157, 161 (2d Cir. 1975); 9 C. Wright and A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2510, at 515 (1971).
Exhibit 10.31


 


	CERTAIN
    IDENTIFIED INFORMATION HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THIS EXHIBIT BECAUSE IT IS BOTH NOT MATERIAL AND IS THE TYPE THAT THE REGISTRANT TREATS
    AS PRIVATE OR CONFIDENTIAL.
# AVS

Quality Management System Title: Domestic NewAction Worksheet with S8 QPM# AIR-ANM-Q30-F7 Date: December 17, 2008 Revision 1 

# Record ofContacts FDMS Docket No. FAA-28fl'UJiO- {)2.

# <£'0 With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA. etc.)?

Organization Person Contacted Date Boeing Jay Shoji 6/30/08 

### AlA Joe White 11118/09

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED Check the Master Ust toVerify That This isthe Correct Revision Before Use
Exhibit 31.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 I, Craig A. Zabala, Chief Executive Officer of Blackhawk Capital Group BDC, Inc. certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Blackhawk Capital Group BDC, Inc.; 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 
 4.
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have; 
 (a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 
 (b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and 
 (c)
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 
 5.
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions); 
 (a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 
 (b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and 
 6.
The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other facts that could significantly affect internal subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 
 Dated: November 19, 2004/s/ Craig A. ZabalaCraig A. Zabala, Chief Executive Officer
# FGIS 965

  MECH. CPB

  FULL ELEC.

  LEVER TR.

  MECH. CPB

  PERMANENT

  PORTABLE

  SERVICE CO. OR

  ARE

  ARE NOT WITHIN THE ACCURACY REQUIREMENTS 

  30  DAYS

  45  DAYS

  180  DAYS

  90  DAYS

  60  DAYS

  ACCEPTANCE

  MAINTENANCE

FORM FGIS 965 (1/24)Previous editions are obsolete. Expires 03-25

FORM APPROVED OMB NO. 0581-0309:  According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.  The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0581-0309.  The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 2 hours per response and 1 minute of recordkeeping, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. 

# Sample Form

# Instructions

# Contact and Distribution

# image1.png
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Joe Boyce Cox, Appellant

No. 06-13-00194-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 6th District Court of 

Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 23689). 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, 

Justice Carter and Justice Moseley 

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of 

the court below. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause for 

further proceedings.

We further order that the appellee, The State of Texas, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 29, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
tenx_101.htm

EXHIBIT 10.1
  
 WAIVER
  
 Reference is hereby made to that certain Securities Purchase Agreement for Class E and Class F Units (the “Purchase Agreement”), dated July 6, 2020, by and among Tenax Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Armistice Capital Master Fund Ltd. (the “Master Fund”). Capitalized terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Securities Purchase Agreement.
  
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 4.17 of the Purchase Agreement, the Master Fund is entitled to appoint up to two (2) directors to the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Designee Directors”) and replace the Designee Directors in certain circumstances, including upon any resignation or removal of the Designee Directors (the “Appointment Right”);
  
 WHEREAS, the Master Fund previously designated Steven Boyd and Keith Maher as its Designee Directors, and each Designee Director recently was reelected to the Board to serve a one-year term expiring in 2023; and
  
 WHEREAS, on June 10, 2022, both Steven Boyd and Keith Maher resigned from the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”), effective immediately.
  
 NOW THEREFORE, the Master Fund hereby completely and irrevocably waives the Appointment Right, whether pursuant to Section 4.17 of the Purchase Agreement or otherwise, and agrees that, as of the date this Waiver is executed, the Master Fund no longer has any right to appoint any replacement or other Designee Director to the Board.
  
 [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
  
 	 
	 1

	

	 

  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Waiver as of June 13, 2022.
  
 	 	Armistice Capital Master Fund Ltd	
	 	 	 	 
		By:	/s/ Brian Kohn	
	  
	 Name:
	Brian Kohn	 
	 	Title:	General Counsel of Armistice Capital, LLC,	 
	 	 	the Investment Manager 	 

                                                
 	 
	 2
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATIONS      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| Dated: | November                14, 2007 |   |   |   | RIDGEWOOD                ENERGY L FUND, LLC                    |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                             | By:    | /s/    |   | ROBERT                E. SWANSON                                    |
|   |                             |   | Name:  |   | Robert                E. Swanson                                    |
|   |                             |   | Title: |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer                |
|   |                             |   |   |   | (Principal                Executive Officer)                        |
|   |                             |   |   |   |                                                                |
| Dated: | November                14, 2007 |   |   |   |                                                                |
|   |                             | By:    | /s/    |   | KATHLEEN                P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |                             |   | Name:  |   | Kathleen                P. McSherry                                 |
|   |                             |   | Title: |   | Executive                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                             |   |   |   | (Principal                Financial and Accounting Officer)         |
|   |                             |   |   |   |                                                                |
|   |                             |   |   |   |                                                                |

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-41140 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTONIO MORA-GARIBAY, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-02-CR-243-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Antonio Mora-Garibay appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being found in the United States, without permission, following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Mora-Garibay concedes that his appellate arguments are foreclosed. He nevertheless raises two issues to preserve them for possible en banc or Supreme Court review. Mora-Garibay argues that the district court erred in determining that his prior state felony conviction for possessionNo. 02-41140 -2- of cocaine was a “drug trafficking crime” under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B) and thus an “aggravated felony” which warranted an eight-level increase in his base offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C)(2001) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). Mora-Garibay’s argument regarding the definitions of “drug trafficking crime” and “aggravated felony” is foreclosed by United States v. Caicedo-Cuero , 312 F.3d 697, 706-11 (5th Cir. 2002), cert. denied , 123 S. Ct. 1948 (2003). The district court did not err in sentencing Mora-Garibay under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C)(2001) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). Mora-Garibay also argues, for the first time on appeal, that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional because it treats a prior conviction for a felony or aggravated felony as a sentencing factor and not as an element of the offense. Mora-Garibay’s argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235, 239-47 (1998). Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 489-90 (2000), did not overrule that decision. See United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000) . Thus, the district court did not err in sentencing Mora-Garibay under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The motion of the Government for summary affirmance is GRANTED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SendTec, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald Gould, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Donald Gould             
|Donald Gould                 
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)
|August 21, 2006
# C_2004094EN.01002102.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/21

---

Action brought on 13 February 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Hellenic Republic

(Case C-67/04)

(2004/C 94/45)

An action against the Hellenic Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 13 February 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Gregorio Valerio Jordana and Minas Konstantinidis, of its Legal Service.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt, or in any event to notify to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/80/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt, or in any event to notify to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/80/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and arguments

The period for transposition of the directive into national law expired on 27 November 2002.

---

(1)  OJ No L 309, 27.11.2001, p. 1.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer ofNew Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1,2022 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC andCNH Equipment Trust 2022-B, does hereby certify that:

 

1.         NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.         The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate tothe Indenture Trustee.

 

3.         This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.         A review of the Servicer’s activities during the period from the trust’s initial cut-off date, July 31, 2022, to andincluding December 31, 2022 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.         To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreementin all material respects throughout the period from the trust’s initial cut-off date, July 31, 2022, to and including December 31,2022.

 

6.         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 30th day of March, 2023.

 

 

 

 

March 30, 2023
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                        |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: August 19, 2008                                                       |   |
|                                                                        |   |
|                                                                        |   |
| /s/ John A. Martell                                                         |   |
| Name: John A. Martell                                                       |   |
| Title: President & Chief Executive Officer                              |   |
|                                                                        |   |
|                                                                        |   |
| /s/ Michael Topa                                                            |   |
| Name: Michael Topa                                                          |   |
| Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |