alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 24 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 24

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
  regarding Presidential election voting rights for residents of all 
              United States territories and commonwealths.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2019

   Ms. Plaskett submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
  regarding Presidential election voting rights for residents of all 
              United States territories and commonwealths.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote in 
the election for President and Vice President shall not be denied or 
abridged by the United States or by any State on account of residency 
in a territory or commonwealth of the United States.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article 
by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
IV 

House Calendar No. 17 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 19 

[Report No. 116–31] 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 

Soap Box Derby. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Ms. NORTON, Mr. BROWN of Maryland, Mr. RASKIN, 

Mr. SARBANES, Mr. TRONE, Mr. BEYER, Mr. CONNOLLY, and Ms. 

WEXTON) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

APRIL 2, 2019 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater 

Washington Soap Box Derby. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 19 RH 

1 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX 

2 DERBY RACES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Greater Washington Soap 

4 Box Derby Association (in this resolution referred to as 

5 the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a public 

6 event, soap box derby races (in this resolution referred to 

7 as the ‘‘event’’), on the Capitol Grounds. 

8 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on 

9 June 15, 2019, or on such other date as the Speaker of 

10 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules 

11 and Administration of the Senate jointly designate. 

12 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed 

14 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

15 Board, the event shall be— 

16 (1) free of admission charge and open to the 

17 public; and 

18 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of 

19 Congress. 

20 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall 

21 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities 

22 incident to all activities associated with the event. 

23 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

24 Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Cap25 itol, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol 

26 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 19 RH 

1 other related structures and equipment as may be required 

2 for the event. 

3 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS. 

4 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

5 Board are authorized to make such additional arrange6 ments as may be required to carry out the event. 

7 SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

8 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce9 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

10 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise11 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

12 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

13 Grounds, with respect to the event. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 17 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 19 

[Report No. 116–31] 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the 

Greater Washington Soap Box Derby. 

APRIL 2, 2019 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
H. Con. Res. 127 Agreed to December 21, 2020

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 133 the Clerk of 

the House of Representatives shall make the following correction: 

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘Making consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2021, providing 

coronavirus emergency response and relief, and for other purposes.’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Cellu Tissue Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended August 27, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, the Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies that:



/s/ DAVID J. MORRIS David J. Morris Senior Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial OfficerOctober 9, 2009


---



QuickLinks
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and coll ateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### MAR 9 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

JOHN HERRERA,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v. TIM LEMASTER, Warden, New Mexico State Penitentiary; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

Respondents-Appellees. No. 97-2325 (Dist. of New Mexico) (D.C. No. CIV-97-737-LH)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

BeforeBALDOCK , EBEL , and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record , this three-judge panel has unanimously determined that oral argument wouldnot be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th-2-

Cir. R. 34.1.9. Petitioner’ request to submit the case on the briefs is granted, and the case is ordered submitted without oral argument

. John Herrera, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis , seeks a certificate of appealability to appeal the district court’s den ial of habeas corpus petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (providing that “[u]nless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability, an appeal may not be taken to the court of appeals fro m the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complainedof arises out of process issued by a state court”). Because Herrera has fai led to make “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right,” w e deny Herrera’s request for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See id . § 2253(c)(2) (certificate of appealability will issue only upon substantial showing of denial of constitutional right); Barefoot v. Estelle , 463 U.S. 880, 893 & n.4 (holding that a petitioner can make a substantial showing of the de nial of constitutional right by demonstrating that the issues raised are debatable among jurists, that a court could resolve the issues differently, or that the questions deserve further proceedings). Upon de novo review of Herrera’s application for a certificate of appealability and brief, the magistrate judge’s Rep ort and Recommendation, and the entire record on appeal, this court concludes that Herrera has failed to-3-

demonstrate that the district court’s resolution of his petition is debatable or is reasonably subject to a different outcome on appeal to this court. This same review leads us to conclude that none of the issues raised by Herrera are deserving of further proceedings. Because Herrera has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, this court DECLINES Herrera’s request for a certificate of appealability and DISMISSES this appeal. ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Michael R. Murphy Circuit Judge
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 41 

Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental 

to the United States economy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2019 

Mr. SCALISE (for himself and Mr. MCKINLEY) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would 

be detrimental to the United States economy. 

Whereas a carbon tax is a Federal tax on carbon released 

from fossil fuels; 

Whereas a carbon tax will increase energy prices, including 

the price of gasoline, electricity, natural gas, and home 

heating oil; 

Whereas a carbon tax will mean that families and consumers 

will pay more for essentials like food, gasoline, and electricity; 

Whereas a carbon tax will fall hardest on the poor, the elderly, and those on fixed incomes; 

Whereas a carbon tax will lead to more jobs and businesses 

moving overseas; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 41 IH 

Whereas a carbon tax will lead to less economic growth; 

Whereas American families will be harmed the most from a 

carbon tax; 

Whereas, according to the Energy Information Administration, the share of energy consumption during 2017 in the 

United States that was derived from fossil fuels was approximately 80 percent; 

Whereas a carbon tax will increase the cost of every good 

manufactured in the United States; 

Whereas a carbon tax will impose disproportionate burdens 

on certain industries, jobs, States, and geographic regions and would further restrict the global competitiveness of the United States; 

Whereas American ingenuity has led to innovations in energy 

exploration and development and has increased production of domestic energy resources on private and Stateowned land which has created significant job growth and 

private capital investment; 

Whereas the energy policy of the United States should encourage continued private sector innovation and development and not increase the existing tax burden on manufacturers; 

Whereas the production of American energy resources increases the ability of the United States to maintain a 

competitive advantage in today’s global economy; 

Whereas a carbon tax would reduce America’s global competitiveness and would encourage development abroad in 

countries that do not impose this exorbitant tax burden; 

and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 41 IH 

Whereas the Congress and the President should focus on progrowth solutions that encourage increased development of 

domestic resources: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that a carbon 

3 tax would be detrimental to American families and busi4 nesses, and is not in the best interest of the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 588 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 588

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the need for transparency 
   regarding meetings between President Donald J. Trump and Russian 
                       President Vladimir Putin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 24, 2018

 Mr. Merkley submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the need for transparency 
   regarding meetings between President Donald J. Trump and Russian 
                       President Vladimir Putin.

Whereas it is the unanimous conclusion of the United States intelligence 
        community that the Government of the Russian Federation interfered in 
        the 2016 Presidential election, at the direction of Russian President 
        Vladimir Putin, to advance the candidacy of then-candidate Donald J. 
        Trump;
Whereas President Trump has repeatedly cast doubt on intelligence community 
        conclusions regarding Russia's attacks during the 2016 election and 
        suggested at his Helsinki press conference, as he has in previous 
        statements, that he believes President Putin's denials despite evidence 
        to the contrary;
Whereas President Trump and individuals associated with his 2016 Presidential 
        campaign remain subjects of an ongoing investigation led by Special 
        Counsel Robert S. Mueller III relating to Russia's efforts to interfere 
        in the 2016 United States Presidential election, an investigation which 
        has yielded 32 indictments and 5 guilty pleas to date;
Whereas President Trump reportedly personally requested that his meeting at the 
        July 16, 2018, Helsinki Summit with President Putin be one-on-one and 
        excluded other United States officials; and
Whereas, since the Helsinki Summit, President Trump and President Putin alluded 
        to oral agreements they made, the specifics of which have not been made 
        known publicly: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) President Trump should not meet with President Putin or 
        any official of the Russian Federation without another senior 
        United States official present; and
            (2) the President, or a designee of the President, should 
        within 7 days report to Congress, in the appropriate setting, 
        on the substance of President Trump's meeting with President 
        Putin, including any agreements or commitments made on behalf 
        of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 242nd District Court of Hale County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on January 16,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Joseph Hernandez v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 07-14-00320-CR Trial Court Number: B18698-1102

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated January 16, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on April 6, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 19 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX 

4 DERBY RACES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Greater Washington Soap 

6 Box Derby Association (in this resolution referred to as 

7 the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a public 
2 

•HCON 19 EH 

1 event, soap box derby races (in this resolution referred to 

2 as the ‘‘event’’), on the Capitol Grounds. 

3 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on 

4 June 15, 2019, or on such other date as the Speaker of 

5 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules 

6 and Administration of the Senate jointly designate. 

7 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed 

9 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

10 Board, the event shall be— 

11 (1) free of admission charge and open to the 

12 public; and 

13 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of 

14 Congress. 

15 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall 

16 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities 

17 incident to all activities associated with the event. 

18 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

19 Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Cap20 itol, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol 

21 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and 

22 other related structures and equipment as may be required 

23 for the event. 
3 

•HCON 19 EH 

1 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS. 

2 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

3 Board are authorized to make such additional arrange4 ments as may be required to carry out the event. 

5 SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

6 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce7 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

8 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise9 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

10 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

11 Grounds, with respect to the event. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 8, 2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 19 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the 

Greater Washington Soap Box Derby.
Fixed-site

Employer

Apply as an individual/

individual business.

Note: The employer is solely responsible 

for ensuring compliance with the terms 

of the grant.

Farm Labor 

Contractor 

(FLC or H-2ALC)

Apply as an individual/

individual business. 

Applicant assumes 

responsibility for grant 

compliance at all 

work sites.

Note: As the single responsible employer, 

the FLC is responsible to ensure that all 

grant commitments are implemented at 

all the worksites on its H-2A application. 

FLCs may choose to sub-award to all 

worksites. DOL cannot process disparate 

employer commitments in a single job 

order, thus all worksites must comply 

with the same commitments to the 

FLSP grant. Growers that utilize FLCs 

(H-2ALCs) will only be eligible as subawardees, under the jurisdiction of their 

labor contractor that applies for the grant. 

FLCs must decide whether or not they 

will subaward to any or all work sites.

Joint Employers

(Non-Association)

Apply jointly for 

FLSP grant, with one 

primary applicant 

Authorized Organization 

Representative and 

another sub-awardee, 

both responsible for their 

respective operations. 

Submit H-2A job order 

certification of joint 

employment.

Note: Employers that typically apply as 

joint employers to H-2A but prefer to 

apply individually to FLSP will need to 

file a unique fixed-site H-2A application 

since DOL cannot process disparate 

commitments in a single job order.
Association Joint Employers

Apply jointly for grant, with one 

primary applicant (presumably 

the Association, though it may be 

any participant willing to assume 

the Authorized Organization 

Representative role) plus subawardee(s) that have all agreed 

to shared commitments and 

compliance on their respective 

operations. Submit H-2A job 

order certification of association 

joint employment. 

A portion of the members of an association can apply 

jointly, with one primary applicant (presumably the 

Association though it may be any participant willing to 

assume the Authorized Organization Representative 

role) plus subawardees that have all agreed to shared 

commitments and compliance on their respective 

operations. In these instances, a master association 

could file multiple separate job orders for each group 

of employers applying to FLSP that have all agreed 

to shared commitments and compliance on their 

respective operations.

Note: Individual members of associations that prefer to apply to the USDA FLSP 

as an individual/individual farm business, thus assuming grant responsibility 

(and benefits) only for their individual operation will need to coordinate with 

their filing agent (association) to submit a unique job order, instead of a joint 

H-2A application, since DOL cannot process disparate employer commitments 

in a single job order.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 81 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 81

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 17, 2019

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a 
               correction in the enrollment of H.R. 1158.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1158, the Clerk of the House 
of Representatives shall make the following correction: Amend the long 
title so as to read: ``Making consolidated appropriations for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 2020, and for other purposes.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 17, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```