alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22823-22824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9394]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Sunshine Act Meetings; Board of Governors

DATES AND TIMES: Thursday, May 3, 2012, at 10 a.m.; and Friday, May 4, 
at 8:30 a.m. and 10:30 a.m.

PLACE: Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 
L'Enfant Plaza SW., in the Benjamin Franklin Room.

STATUS: Thursday, May 3 at 10 a.m.--Closed; Friday, May 4 at 8:30 
a.m.--Open; and at 10:30 a.m.--Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Thursday, May 3 at 10 a.m. (Closed)

    1. Strategic Issues.
    2. Financial Matters.
    3. Pricing.
    4. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.
    5. Governors' Executive Session--Discussion of prior agenda items 
and Board Governance.

Friday, May 4 at 8:30 a.m. (Open)

    1. Approval of Minutes of Previous Meetings.
    2. Remarks of the Chairman of the Board.
    3. Remarks of the Postmaster General and CEO.
    4. Committee Reports.
    5. Quarterly Report on Financial Performance.
    6. Quarterly Report on Service Performance.
    7. Tentative Agenda for the June 14, 2012, meeting in Washington, 
DC.

[[Page 22824]]

Friday, May 4 at 10:30 a.m. (Closed--if needed)

    1. Continuation of Thursday's closed session agenda.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9394 Filed 4-13-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12 P
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 18 (Tuesday, January 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 4454]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01615]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Friday, January 31, 2014.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room

STATUS: Closed

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance, Enforcement Matters, and 
Examinations. In the event that the times, dates or locations of this 
or any future meetings change, an announcement of the change, along 
with the new time, date and location of the meeting will be posted on 
the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Melissa D. Jurgens, 202-418-5516.

Natise Stowe,
Executive Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2014-01615 Filed 1-24-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
Exhibit 35.1


DTE Electric Company





Annual Certificate of Compliance


Under the Servicing Agreement,


dated as of November 1, 2023





The undersigned hereby certifies that the undersigned is the duly elected and acting Chief Accounting Officer of DTE Electric Company, as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Securitization Property Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2023 (the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Servicer and DTE Electric Securitization Funding II LLC, and further certifies that:


1. A review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement during the year ended December 31, 2023 has been made under the supervision of the undersigned pursuant to Section 3.03 of the Servicing Agreement.


2. To the undersigned's knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Servicing Agreement throughout the year ended December 31, 2023.





DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY(as Servicer)By:/S/  TRACY J. MYRICKTracy J. MyrickChief Accounting Officer


Date: March 20, 2024
1/20/16

TO: FAA RE: Request Amendment s for 333 Exemption #14292 Klein creative Media Regulatory docket No FAA

- 2015

- 4862 To whom it may

concern at the FAA, After reviewing the information in my exemption, I am writing to request some additional amendments that I forgot in my letter dated 1/19/16 . I n another document labeled, “Letter to FAA John S. Duncan” Irequested two amendments and sent supporting documents to request 1.) Additional UAS models to be approved, and 2.) Closed Set for Motion Picture and Film approval. In this separate addendum, I am requesting amendments in the following limitations: #13 this part limits operation to that of just the PIC. I would like to request that since I am a certified PI C, that I may also hire a no n - certified pilot s to act as UAS operator and I would be responsible, and oversee the individual is acting in accordance with the FAA safe flight rules as stated in my exemption

. #26 on my

exemption states that the UAS may not be operated by

the PI C f rom any moving device or vehicle. I would like to request to amend this so I can film both on the land and on the water from a moving vehicle (ie, boat, golf cart , etc. ) Thank y ou for y our consideration. Sincerel y, Marci Klein Klein Creative Media 16 20 Spreckels Lane Redondo Beach, CA 90278 (310)990

- 4120
# C_2004094EN.01006402.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/64

---

Action brought on 18 February 2004 by Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market

(Case T-74/04)

(2004/C 94/161)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities by Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., having its registered office in Vevey (Switzerland), represented by Jean-Jo Evrard, lawyer.

Quick Restaurants S.A. was also party to the proceedings before the Second Board of Appeal.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the defendant of 17 December 2003; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the defendant of 17 December 2003;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. |
| --- | --- |
| Community trade mark concerned: | Figurative trade mark ‘QUICKY’ — application No 467 746, filed for products in Classes 29 (meat etc.), 30 (coffee etc.) and 32 (mineral waters etc.) |
| Proprietor of the trade mark or sign entering opposition: | QUICK RESTAURANTS, a public limited company constituted under Belgian law |
| Trade mark or sign on the basis of which opposition was made: | National and international word and figurative trade marks ‘QUICK’ and ‘QUICKIES’ |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Registration refused |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |
| Pleas in law relied on: | Wrongful application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1). The applicant claims that the trade marks in question are not phonetically and conceptually similar. |

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Société des Produits Nestlé S.A.

Community trade mark concerned:

Figurative trade mark ‘QUICKY’ — application No 467 746, filed for products in Classes 29 (meat etc.), 30 (coffee etc.) and 32 (mineral waters etc.)

Proprietor of the trade mark or sign entering opposition:

QUICK RESTAURANTS, a public limited company constituted under Belgian law

Trade mark or sign on the basis of which opposition was made:

National and international word and figurative trade marks ‘QUICK’ and ‘QUICKIES’

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Registration refused

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Appeal dismissed

Pleas in law relied on:

Wrongful application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1). The applicant claims that the trade marks in question are not phonetically and conceptually similar.

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p.1)

1

---
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 95 

Expressing the sense of the Congress that State agencies and other providers 

of foster care services should make every effort to ensure siblings remain 

together in the foster system. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2020 

Ms. KUSTER of New Hampshire (for herself, Mrs. HARTZLER, Ms. BASS, and 

Mr. BACON) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Congress that State agencies 

and other providers of foster care services should make 

every effort to ensure siblings remain together in the 

foster system. 

Whereas sibling relationships are important and should be 

recognized and respected; 

Whereas sibling relationships provide needed continuity and 

stability during a child’s placement in foster care; 

Whereas the sibling bond is unique and separate from the 

parent-child bond, and may include relations with people 

not linked by blood; 

Whereas siblings share similar history, heritage, culture, and 

often biology; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 95 IH 

Whereas the Fostering Connections to Success and Promoting Adoption Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–351) requires that States place siblings removed from their home 

in the same foster care, kinship guardianship, or adoptive 

placement, unless the State documents that such a joint 

placement would be contrary to the safety or well-being 

of any of the siblings; 

Whereas, in a case where siblings are removed from their 

home and not placed jointly, the State is to provide for 

their frequent visitation or interaction, unless the State 

documents that such a joint placement would be contrary 

to the safety or well-being of any of the siblings; 

Whereas sibling separation is a significant and distinct loss 

that must be ameliorated by frequent and regular contact; and 

Whereas every foster child deserves the right to know and be 

actively involved in their siblings’ lives absent extraordinary circumstances: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that 

3 State agencies and other providers of foster care services 

4 should— 

5 (1) make every effort to ensure that children 

6 are placed in homes with their siblings; 

7 (2) ensure that siblings who are not placed to8 gether are provided with ample opportunities to com9 municate with each other and remain connected; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HCON 95 IH 

1 (3) in a case where siblings are not placed 

2 jointly, document the reasons why. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Inverso Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and
on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Company.



3.
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.







Date:
 November  17, 2006



By:
/s/ Randall S. Goulding

------------------------------------------------

Randall
S. Goulding

Chief
Financial Officer
A-A-20272

 NOTICE 1

 October 31, 2018

COMMERCIAL ITEM DESCRIPTION (CID)

BEANS, WITH JALAPEÑO PEPPERS, CANNED,

INCLUDING PRODUCT FLAVORED WITH SLAB BACON

This cancellation was approved by the

U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

CID A-A-20272, Beans, with Jalapeño Peppers, Canned, Including Product Flavored with Slab 

Bacon, dated September 24, 1997, is hereby canceled due to the contents being incorporated into 

CID A-A-20134D, Beans, Dried; Pork and Beans; and Baked Beans, Canned, dated September 

26, 2018.

CIVIL AGENCY COORDINATING ACTIVITIES:

DOJ - BOP

HHS - NIH, IHS

USDA - SCP

VA - OSS

PREPARING ACTIVITY:

USDA - SCP

FSC 8915/8940

 NOTICE OF 

CANCELLATION

INCH-POUND
THE VISUAL AIDS ON THE FOLLOWING 

PAGES ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND 

NOT INTENDED FOR OFFICIAL USE. 

TO PURCHASE OFFICIAL VISUAL AIDS PLEASE CONTACT 

THE SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION’S 

EQUIPMENT AND FORMS DEPOT 

USDA, AMS, FVP, SCI

831 MITTEN ROAD, ROOM 200

BURLINGAME, CA 94010

PHONE: 650-552-9073

FAX: 650-552-9147

EQUIPMENT CATALOG
ASPARAGUS 

Closed and Slightly Spread Tips. Allowed in U.S. No. 1. 

Asparagus, Photo No. 6 

November 1994 

(Previously No. 6, no date) 
ASPARAGUS 

Spreading Tips. Not U.S. No. 1. 

Asparagus, Photo No. 7 

November 1994 

(Previously No. 7, no date) 
ASPARAGUS 

Fairly Straight Asparagus Stalks. Permitted in U.S. No. 1. 

Asparagu

(Previously 
ASPARAGUS 

Not Badly Misshapen Asparagus Stalks. Permitted in U.S. No. 2. 

Asparagu

(Previously 
ASPARAGUS 

 A – U.S. No. 1 B – U.S. No. 1, Lower Limit 

Asparagus, Photo No. 12 

February 1991 

(Previously No. 12, no date) 
ASPARAGUS – SPREADING TIPS 

U.S. No. 2 – Lower Limit. Damaged By Spreading, But Not Seriously Damaged. 

Asparagus, Photo No. 13 

February 1991 

(Previously No. 13, no date)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 28, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-30842

Conference Calendar

JOSEPH W. HADWIN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD STALDER; LINDA RAMSAY; VENETIA MICHAEL; 

BECKY MOSS; RAY HANSON,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:03-CV-1735

--------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Joseph W. Hadwin, former Louisiana prisoner # 126755,

appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 complaint with prejudice as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Hadwin challenged David Wade Correctional

Center’s (DWCC’s) Posted Policy # 43, which requires an inmate

who is sentenced to isolation to relinquish his mattress and

bedding from 5:00 a.m. until 9:00 p.m. Hadwin alleged that this
No. 05-30842

-2-

policy violated his due process rights and his Eighth Amendment

rights against cruel and unusual punishment. 

Policy # 43 did not impose an objectively sufficient

deprivation or the “denial of the minimal civilized measures of

life’s necessities.” Palmer v. Johnson, 193 F.3d 346, 352 (5th

Cir. 1999)(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Thus,

the prison’s implementation of Policy # 43 did not constitute

cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. See

Novak v. Beto, 453 F.2d 661, 665-66 (5th Cir. 1971). The

district court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief on

Hadwin’s Eighth Amendment claim. See Talib v. Gilley, 138 F.3d

211, 213 (5th Cir. 1998). As Policy # 43 does not clearly

impinge on the duration of Hadwin’s confinement or constitute

atypical punishment, the district court did not abuse its

discretion in dismissing the due process claim as frivolous. See

Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 483-84 (1995); Orellana v. Kyle,

65 F.3d 29, 31-32 & n.2 (5th Cir. 1995). 

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Apollo Drilling, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Robert Nelson, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify that:

3.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

4.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  ROBERT NELSON      |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Robert Nelson           |
| Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |
| November 20, 2006       |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Exhibit 10.3


 


Biofrontera
Inc.


 


Summary
of Director Compensation


 


The
following is a summary of the currently effective compensation of the Directors of Biofrontera Inc. (the “Company”) for services
as Directors, which is subject to modification at any time by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) or the Compensation Committee
of the Board, as applicable.


 


Retainers
and Meeting Fees


 


The
following table sets forth the retainer fees to be paid to the non-employee directors of the Company:


 


	Board of Directors:	 	 	 	 
	All non-employee members	 	$	40,250	 
	Additional retainer for non-executive chairperson	 	$	30,000	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee:	 	 	 	 
	Members	 	$	8,000	 
	Additional retainer for chair	 	$	8,000	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Compensation Committee:	 	 	 	 
	Members	 	$	6,000	 
	Additional retainer for chair	 	$	9,000	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee:	 	 	 	 
	Members	 	$	5,000	 
	Additional retainer for chair	 	$	5,000	 




 


Such
retainer fees shall be payable in four equal quarterly installments, provided that the amount of such payment will be prorated for any
portion of such quarter that the director is not serving on the Board or any committee of the Board.


 


Equity
Compensation – Annual Grants


 


Each
director shall receive an annual award of common stock of the Company equal to a cash value of $58,433, with said shares being subject
to annual approval of the Board at the time of said award.
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan 

ORDER 

Valerie Urech v Pioneer State Mutual Insurance Company 

Docket No. 339784 

LC No. 16-013750 NF 

Douglas B. Shapiro 

Presiding Judge 

Jane M. Beckering 

Michael J. Kelly 

Judges 

The Court orders that the dissenting opinion is hereby AMENDED. The dissenting opinion contained 

the following clerical error: Page eight, second paragraph from the bottom, the second sentence should 

read: That is, reasonable minds could differ on whether Urech understood the nature of the documents 

her son had her sign and whether at the end of the month she could have recalled who assisted her when. 

In all other respects, the July 2, 2019 dissenting opinion remains unchanged. 

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr., Chief Clerk, on 

JUL O 9 2019 

Date 

~«)~- 9-

Chielerk
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

WENDAL MAURICE BAKER

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 2340

[ October 10, 2019 ]

Appeal from order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court

for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Gary L. Sweet

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562010CF834A

.

Wendal Maurice Baker, Blountstown, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER

, G ROSS and G ERBER , JJ. , concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

SUPREME COURT CAUSE NO. DA 23-0149

FIRST INTERNET BANK OF

INDIANA.

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/ Appellee,

vs.

PONTUS SK PORTFOLIO, LLC, and MICHAEL K. PRESS,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs/ Appellants.

vs.

CHARLES D. KING

Intervenor/Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

Upon motion of the Appellants throu gh counsel and Appellee Charles D.

King having no objection thereto, and pursu ant to Rule 26(1) Mont. R. App. P.:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Appe llants are granted an additional 30-

day extension until June 9, 2023, in which to prepare, f ile, and serve their Opening

Brief.

ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND DATED BELOW.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court May 11 2023

05/11/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0149
1*17-/*

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 01-13-00414-CR OFFENSE: 22.021 (Aggravated SexAssault)

STYLE: Stevie Wyre v. The State ofTexas COUNTY: Harris

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 179th District Court

DATE: 08/29/2014 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 1364440

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

STYLE: Stevie Wyre v. The State of Texas

PftO SE Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: flJO0&l*7#i??l M ^orf

JUDGE: /^ CUAAyjt^—.

PAO SB PETITION

FORDISCREHONARY REVIEW

IS K&fotg^

DATE ^//y/a?/r

CCA#: 1112-1*

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:_

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
Exhibit 32.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Solo Cup Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Susan H. Marks, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Susan H. Marks     
|Susan H. Marks         
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 5, 2004