Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 10, 2012 / Notices 21527 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden 

(including hours and cost) of the 

proposed collection of information; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including through the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized and/or 

included in the request for OMB 

approval of this information collection; 

they also will become a matter of public 

record. 

Dated: April 4, 2012. 

Glenna Mickelson, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2012–8511 Filed 4–9–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Docket 28–2012] 

Foreign-Trade Zone 18—San Jose, CA 

Application for Reorganization Under 

Alternative Site Framework 

An application has been submitted to 

the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board 

(the Board) by the City of San Jose, 

grantee of FTZ 18, requesting authority 

to reorganize the zone under the 

alternative site framework (ASF) 

adopted by the Board (74 FR 1170, 1/12/ 

2009 (correction 74 FR 3987, 1/22/ 

2009); 75 FR 71069–71070, 11/22/2010). 

The ASF is an option for grantees for the 

establishment or reorganization of 

general-purpose zones and can permit 

significantly greater flexibility in the 

designation of new ‘‘usage-driven’’ FTZ 

sites for operators/users located within 

a grantee’s ‘‘service area’’ in the context 

of the Board’s standard 2,000-acre 

activation limit for a general-purpose 

zone project. The application was 

submitted pursuant to the Foreign-Trade 

Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a– 

81u), and the regulations of the Board 

(15 CFR part 400). It was formally filed 

on April 4, 2012. 

FTZ 18 was approved by the Board on 

November 27, 1974 (Board Order 103, 

39 FR 42031, 12/04/1974), reorganized 

on October 13, 1983 (Board Order 228, 

48 FR 48486, 10/19/1983, and relocated 

on April 3, 1985 (Board Order 293, 50 

FR 15206, 04/17/1985). 

The current zone project includes the 

following site: Site 1 (7.5 acres)—2055 

South Street South, Suite A, San Jose. 

The grantee’s proposed service area 

under the ASF would be the City of San 

Jose, California, as described in the 

application. If approved, the grantee 

would be able to serve sites throughout 

the service area based on companies’ 

needs for FTZ designation. The 

proposed service area is within the San 

Jose U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

port of entry. 

The applicant is requesting authority 

to reorganize its existing zone project to 

include its existing site as a ‘‘magnet’’ 

site. No usage-driven sites are being 

requested at this time. Because the ASF 

only pertains to establishing or 

reorganizing a general-purpose zone, the 

application would have no impact on 

FTZ 18’s authorized subzones. 

In accordance with the Board’s 

regulations, Christopher Kemp of the 

FTZ Staff is designated examiner to 

evaluate and analyze the facts and 

information presented in the application 

and case record and to report findings 

and recommendations to the Board. 

Public comment is invited from 

interested parties. Submissions (original 

and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the 

Board’s Executive Secretary at the 

address below. The closing period for 

their receipt is June 11, 2012. Rebuttal 

comments in response to material 

submitted during the foregoing period 

may be submitted during the subsequent 

15-day period to June 25, 2012. 

A copy of the application will be 

available for public inspection at the 

Office of the Executive Secretary, 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 2111, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230–0002, and in the ‘‘Reading 

Room’’ section of the Board’s Web site, 

which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ 

ftz. For further information, contact 

Christopher Kemp at 

Christopher.Kemp@trade.gov or (202) 

482–0862. 

Dated: April 4, 2012. 

Elizabeth Whiteman, 

Acting Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2012–8619 Filed 4–9–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–821–811] 

Ammonium Nitrate From Russia: 

Correction to Notice of Opportunity To 

Request Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brenda E. Waters, AD/CVD Operations, 

Customs Unit, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4735. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 

2, 2012, the Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published its 

opportunity to request administrative 

review of the antidumping duty orders 

and inadvertently omitted Ammonium 

Nitrate from Russia, POR 5/2/2011–3/ 

31/2012. See Antidumping or 

Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 

Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 77 

FR 63 (April 2, 2012). This notice serves 

as a correction to include the 

Ammonium Nitrate from Russia 

administrative review in the referenced 

notice. 

Dated: April 4, 2012. 

Gary Taverman, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–8621 Filed 4–9–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–836] 

Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality 

Steel Plate Products From the 

Republic of Korea: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On January 13, 2012, the 

Department of Commerce published the 

preliminary results of the administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on certain cut-to-length carbon-quality 

steel plate products from the Republic 

of Korea. The review covers one 

manufacturer/exporter. The period of 

review is February 1, 2010, through 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
21528 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 10, 2012 / Notices 

1See Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel 

Plate Products From the Republic of Korea: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 77 FR 2032 (January 13, 

2012) (Preliminary Results). 

January 31, 2011. The final margin is 

listed below in the ‘‘Final Results of the 

Review’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 10, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Yang Jin Chun, AD/CVD Operations 

Office 1, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–5760. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 13, 2012, the Department 

of Commerce (the Department) 

published the preliminary results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain cutto-length carbon-quality steel plate 

products (CTL plate) from the Republic 

of Korea (Korea).1

We invited interested parties to 

comment on the Preliminary Results. On 

February 13, 2012, we received a case 

brief from Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. 

(DSM). On February 21, 2012, we 

received a rebuttal brief from Nucor 

Corporation. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the 

antidumping duty order are certain hotrolled carbon-quality steel: (1) Universal 

mill plates (i.e., flat-rolled products 

rolled on four faces or in a closed box 

pass, of a width exceeding 150 mm but 

not exceeding 1250 mm, and of a 

nominal or actual thickness of not less 

than 4 mm, which are cut-to length (not 

in coils) and without patterns in relief), 

of iron or non-alloy quality steel; and (2) 

flat-rolled products, hot-rolled, of a 

nominal or actual thickness of 4.75 mm 

or more and of a width which exceeds 

150 mm and measures at least twice the 

thickness, and which are cut-to-length 

(not in coils). Steel products included in 

the scope of the order are of rectangular, 

square, circular, or other shape and of 

rectangular or non-rectangular cross 

section where such non-rectangular 

cross-section is achieved subsequent to 

the rolling process (i.e., products which 

have been ‘‘worked after rolling’’)—for 

example, products which have been 

beveled or rounded at the edges. Steel 

products that meet the noted physical 

characteristics that are painted, 

varnished, or coated with plastic or 

other non-metallic substances are 

included within the scope. Also, 

specifically included in the scope of the 

order are high strength, low alloy 

(HSLA) steels. HSLA steels are 

recognized as steels with micro-alloying 

levels of elements such as chromium, 

copper, niobium, titanium, vanadium, 

and molybdenum. Steel products 

included in the scope, regardless of 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) definitions, are 

products in which: (1) Iron 

predominates, by weight, over each of 

the other contained elements, (2) the 

carbon content is two percent or less, by 

weight, and (3) none of the elements 

listed below is equal to or exceeds the 

quantity, by weight, respectively 

indicated: 1.80 percent of manganese, or 

1.50 percent of silicon, or 1.00 percent 

of copper, or 0.50 percent of aluminum, 

or 1.25 percent of chromium, or 0.30 

percent of cobalt, or 0.40 percent of 

lead, or 1.25 percent of nickel, or 0.30 

percent of tungsten, or 0.10 percent of 

molybdenum, or 0.10 percent of 

niobium, or 0.41 percent of titanium, or 

0.15 percent of vanadium, or 0.15 

percent zirconium. All products that 

meet the written physical description, 

and in which the chemistry quantities 

do not equal or exceed any one of the 

levels listed above, are within the scope 

of the order unless otherwise 

specifically excluded. The following 

products are specifically excluded from 

the order: (1) Products clad, plated, or 

coated with metal, whether or not 

painted, varnished or coated with 

plastic or other non-metallic substances; 

(2) SAE grades (formerly AISI grades) of 

series 2300 and above; (3) products 

made to ASTM A710 and A736 or their 

proprietary equivalents; (4) abrasionresistant steels (i.e., USS AR 400, USS 

AR 500); (5) products made to ASTM 

A202, A225, A514 grade S, A517 grade 

S, or their proprietary equivalents; (6) 

ball bearing steels; (7) tool steels; and (8) 

silicon manganese steel or silicon 

electric steel. 

Imports of CTL plate are currently 

classified in the HTSUS under 

subheadings 7208.40.30.30, 

7208.40.30.60, 7208.51.00.30, 

7208.51.00.45, 7208.51.00.60, 

7208.52.00.00, 7208.53.00.00, 

7208.90.00.00, 7210.70.30.00, 

7210.90.90.00, 7211.13.00.00, 

7211.14.00.30, 7211.14.00.45, 

7211.90.00.00, 7212.40.10.00, 

7212.40.50.00, 7212.50.00.00, 

7225.40.30.50, 7225.40.70.00, 

7225.50.60.00, 7225.99.00.90, 

7226.91.50.00, 7226.91.70.00, 

7226.91.80.00, and 7226.99.00.00. The 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes. The 

written description of the merchandise 

covered by the order is dispositive. 

Analysis of the Comments Received 

The issue raised in DSM’s case brief 

is addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum’’ (Decision Memo) from 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary Gary 

Taverman to Assistant Secretary Paul 

Piquado dated concurrently with this 

notice, which is hereby adopted by this 

notice. The sole issue which DSM has 

raised and to which we have responded 

is related to zeroing. The Decision 

Memo is a public document and is on 

file electronically via Import 

Administration’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). 

Access to IA ACCESS is available in the 

Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the 

main Department of Commerce 

building. In addition, a complete 

version of the Decision Memo can be 

accessed directly on the Import 

Administration Web site at http:// 

ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/index.html. The 

signed Decision Memo and the 

electronic versions of the Decision 

Memo are identical in content. 

Final Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, we 

determine that the weighted-average 

dumping margin for DSM is 1.64 

percent for the period February 1, 2010, 

through January 31, 2011. 

The Department shall determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries. In accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we 

calculated an importer-specific 

assessment rate for the final results of 

review. We divided the total dumping 

margins for the reviewed sales by the 

total entered value of those reviewed 

sales for the importer. We will instruct 

CBP to assess the importer-specific rate 

uniformly, as appropriate, on all entries 

of subject merchandise made by the 

relevant importer during the period of 

review. See 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment of 

Antidumping Duties). This clarification 

will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the period of 

review produced by DSM for which 

DSM did not know its merchandise was 

destined for the United States. In such 

instances, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries of the 

DSM-produced merchandise at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 10, 2012 / Notices 21529 

2See Preliminary Results, 77 FR at 2036, and 

Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate 

Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 

19046, 19048 (April 27, 2009). 

1 In publishing the Preliminary Results, the 

Federal Register distorted the title of the notice; the 

Federal Register thereafter published the correct 

title of the notice in 76 FR 65497 (October 21, 

2011). 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. See Assessment of 

Antidumping Duties for a full 

discussion of this clarification. 

The Department will issue 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

publication of the final results of 

review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of the 

notice of final results of administrative 

review for all shipments of CTL plate 

from Korea entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date of publication, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act): (1) The cash 

deposit rate for DSM will be the 1.64 

percent; (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not listed above, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the company-specific rate published for 

the most recent period; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the less-thanfair-value investigation but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recent period for the manufacturer of 

the merchandise; (4) if neither the 

exporter nor the manufacturer has its 

own rate, the cash deposit rate will be 

0.98 percent,2 the all-others rate 

established in the less-than-fair-value 

investigation, adjusted for the exportsubsidy rate in the companion 

countervailing duty investigation. These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importer 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO as explained in 

the APO itself. See 19 CFR 

351.305(a)(3). Timely written 

notification of the destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 

violation. 

These final results of administrative 

review are issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: April 4, 2012. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2012–8604 Filed 4–9–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–848] 

Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From 

the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Rescission 

of Review in Part 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On October 7, 2011, the 

Department of Commerce published the 

preliminary results of the administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on freshwater crawfish tail meat from 

the People’s Republic of China (PRC). 

The review covers five exporters. The 

period of review is September 1, 2009, 

through August 31, 2010. 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, we have made 

changes in the margin calculations for 

one company. Therefore, the final 

results differ from the preliminary 

results. The final weighted-average 

dumping margins for the reviewed firms 

are listed below in the section entitled 

‘‘Final Results of the Review.’’ 

DATES: Effective Date: April 10, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dmitry Vladimirov or Minoo Hatten, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0665 or (202) 482– 

1690, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 7, 2011, the Department 

of Commerce (the Department) 

published Freshwater Crawfish Tail 

Meat From the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Intent To Rescind Review in 

Part, 76 FR 62349 (October 7, 2011) 

(Preliminary Results),1 in the Federal 

Register. The administrative review 

covers Xiping Opeck Food Co., Ltd. 

(Xiping Opeck), Shanghai Ocean Flavor 

International Trading Co., Ltd. 

(Shanghai Ocean Flavor), China 

Kingdom (Beijing) Import & Export Co., 

Ltd. (China Kingdom), Xuzhou Jinjiang 

Foodstuffs Co., Ltd. (Xuzhou Jinjiang), 

and Nanjing Gemsen International Co., 

Ltd. (Nanjing Gemsen). 

On January 25, 2012, we published 

Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the 

People’s Republic of China: Extension of 

Time Limit for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 77 FR 3730 (January 25, 2012), 

in which we extended fully the deadline 

for the final results to April 4, 2012. 

On February 13, 2012, we determined 

a rate for Xiping Opeck, the sole 

mandatory respondent in this review, 

on the basis of adverse facts available 

(AFA). See memorandum to Paul 

Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, entitled ‘‘Freshwater 

Crawfish Tail Meat from the People’s 

Republic of China—Post-Preliminary 

Analysis Memorandum—The Use of 

Adverse Facts Available,’’ dated 

February 13, 2012 (AFA Memo). We 

invited interested parties to comment on 

the Preliminary Results and the AFA 

Memo. 

We received case and rebuttal briefs 

from Xiping Opeck and the petitioner, 

the Crawfish Processors Alliance. No 

interested party requested a hearing. 

The Department has conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the 

antidumping duty order is freshwater 

crawfish tail meat, in all its forms 

(whether washed or with fat on, 

whether purged or un-purged), grades, 

and sizes; whether frozen, fresh, or 

chilled; and regardless of how it is 

packed, preserved, or prepared. 

Excluded from the scope of the order are 

live crawfish and other whole crawfish, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES