UTAH STATE 

BULLETIN 

OFFICIAL NOTICES OF UTAH STATE GOVERNMENT 

Filed September 01, 2012, 12:00 a.m. through September 14, 2012, 11:59 p.m. 

Number 2012-19 

October 0I,2012 

Nancy L. Lancaster, Editor 

Kenneth A. Hansen, Director 

Kimberly K. Hood, Executive Director 

The Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin) is an official noticing publication of the executive branch of 

Utah State Government. The Department of Administrative Services, Division of Administrative Rules 

produces the Bulletin under authority of Section 63G-3-402. 

Inquiries concerning the substance or applicability of an administrative rule that appears in the 

Bulletin should be addressed to the contact person for the rule. Questions about the Bulletin or the 

rulemaking process may be addressed to: Division of Administrative Rules, PO Box 141007, Salt Lake 

City, Utah 84114-1007, telephone 801-538-3764, FAX 801-537-9240. Additional rulemaking 

information, and electronic versions of all administrative rule publications are available at: 

http://www.rules.utah.gov/ 

The information in this Bulletin is summarized in the Utah State Digest (Digest). The Digest is 

available by E-mail or over the Internet. Visit http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/digest.htm for 

additional information. 
Division of Administrative Rules, Salt Lake City 84114 

Unless otherwise noted, all infom1ation presented in this publication is in the 

public domain and may be reproduced, reprinted, and redistributed as desired. 

Materials incorporated by reference retain the copyright asserted by their respective authors. 

Citation to the source is requested. 

Utah state bulletin. 

Semimonthly. 

I. Delegated legislation--Utah--Periodicals. 2. Administrative procedure-Utah-Periodicals. 

I. Utah. Office of Administrative Rules. 

KFU440.A 73S7 

348. 792'025-DDC 85-643197 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

SPECIAL NOTICES ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 

Environmental Quality 

Air Quality 

Notice of Public Comment Period for the Fireworks Exceptional Events ................................................................... 1 

EXECUTIVE DOCUMENTS ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 

Governor 

Administration 

Governor's Executive Order E0/09/2012: Wildland Fire Management.. ................................................................... 3 

Governor's Proclamation 2012/07/E: Calling the Fifty-Ninth Legislature Into 

the Seventh Extraordinary Session .......................................................................................................................... 4 

Governor's Executive Order E0/10/2012: Declaring a State of Emergency Due 

to a Breached Dam and Flooding in Washington County ........................................................................................ 5 

NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES ................................................................................................................................................. 7 

Commerce 

Occupational and Professional Licensing 

No. 36759 (Amendment): R156-24b Physical Therapy Practice Act Rule ................................................................. 8 

No. 36757 (Amendment): R156-60 Mental Health Professional Practice Act Rule ................................................ :.11 

No. 36758 (Amendment): R 156-60c Professional Counselor Licensing Act Rule ................................................... 13 

Education 

Administration 

No. 36769 (Amendment): R277-112 Prohibiting Discrimination in the Public Schools ............................................ 18 

No. 36770 (Amendment): R277-420-1 Definitions ................................................................................................... 20 

No. 36771 (Amendment): R277-423 Delivery of Flow Through Money ................................................................... 21 

No. 36772 (Amendment): R277-424-1 Definitions ................................................................................................... 22 

No. 36773 (Amendment): R277-454-1 Definitions ................................................................................................... 23 

No. 36774 (Amendment): R277-531 Public Educator Evaluation Requirements (PEER) ....................................... 24 

Environmental Quality 

Administration 

No. 36775 (New Rule): R305-8 Board Member Attendance Requirements ............................................................. 27 

No. 36776 (New Rule): R305-9 Recusal of a Board Member for Conflict of lnterest.. ............................................. 28 

Air Quality 

No. 36723 (Amendment): R307-101-2 Definitions ................................................................................................... 29 

No. 36742 (Amendment): R307-110 General Requirements: State Implementation 

Plan ........................................................................................................................................................................ 36 

No. 36721 (Amendment): R307-110-10 Section IX, Control Measures for Area and 

Point Sources, Part A, Fine Particulate Matter ....................................................................................................... 40 

No. 36722 (Amendment): R307-110-17 Section IX, Control Measures forArea and 

Point Sources, Part H, Emissions Limits ................................................................................................................ 41 

No. 36741 (Amendment): R307-307 Davis, Salt Lake, and Utah Counties: Road 

Salting and Sanding ............................................................................................................................................... 42 

No. 36724 (New Rule): R307-311 Emission Standards for PM2.5 Nonattainment Areas ....................................... .44 

No. 36740 (New Rule): R307-312 Aggregate Processing Operations for PM2.5 

Non attainment Areas .............................................................................................................................................. 45 

No. 36739 (New Rule): R307-334 Emissions Standards: Industrial Baking Ovens ................................................ 47 

No. 36725 (Repeal): R307-340 Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas: Surface 

Coating Processes ................................................................................................................................................. 49 

No. 36738 (Amendment): R307-343 Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas: 

Emissions Standards for Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations .................................................................... 56 

No. 36726 (New Rule): R307-344 Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings ........................................................................... 65 

No. 36727 (New Rule): R307-345 Fabric and Vinyl Coatings .................................................................................. 67 

No. 36728 (New Rule): R307-346 Metal Furniture Surface Coatings ...................................................................... 69 

No. 36729 (New Rule): R307-347 Large Appliance Surface Coatings .................................................................... 71 

No. 36730 (New Rule): R307-348 Magnet Wire Coatings ....................................................................................... 73 

No. 36731 (New Rule): R307-349 Flat Wood Panel Coatings ................................................................................. 74 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, OctoberOI, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

No. 36732 (New Rule): R307-350 Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products 

Coatings ................................................................................................................................................................. 76 

No. 36733 (New Rule): R307-351 GraphicArts ....................................................................................................... 80 

No. 36734 (New Rule): R307-352 Metal Container, Closure, and Coil Coatings ..................................................... 84 

No. 36735 (New Rule): R307-353 Plastic Part Coatings ......................................................................................... 86 

No. 36736 (New Rule): R307-354 Automotive Refinishing Coatings ....................................................................... 88 

No. 36737 (New Rule): R307-355 Control of Emissions from Aerospace Manufacture 

and Rework Facilities ............................................................................................................................................ 91 

Governor 

Economic Development 

No. 36749 (Amendment): R357-6 Technology and Life Science Economic Development 

and Related Tax Credits ......................................................................................................................................... 94 

Health 

Family Health and Preparedness, Child Care Licensing 

No. 36715 (Amendment): R430-6 Background Screening ....................................................................................... 95 

No. 36716 (Amendment): R430-50 Residential Certificate Child Care .................................................................... 98 

No. 36717 (Amendment): R430-60 Hourly Child Care Centers ............................................................................. 100 

No. 36718 (Amendment): R430-70 Out of School Time Child Care Programs ...................................................... 103 

No. 36719 (Amendment): R430-90 Licensed Family Child Care ........................................................................... 107 

No. 36720 (Amendment): R430-100 Child Care Centers ....................................................................................... 110 

Heritage and Arts 

History 

No. 36762 (Amendment): R455-4 Ancient Human Remains .................................................................................. 112 

Insurance 

Administration 

No. 36745 (New Rule): R590-265 Hazardous Financial Condition Rule ................................................................ 113 

Workforce Services 

Employment Development 

No. 36761 (Amendment): R986-200-247 Utah Back to Work Pilot Program (BWP) .............................................. 116 

Unemployment Insurance 

No. 36760 (Amendment): R994-406-302 Repayment and Collection of Fault 

Overpayments ...................................................................................................................................................... 118 

FIVE-YEAR NOTICES OF REVIEW AND STATEMENTS OF CONTINUATION ......................................................................... 121 

Education 

Administration 

No. 36763: R277-419 Pupil Accounting ................................................................................................................. 121 

No. 36764: R277-420 Aiding Financially Distressed School Districts .................................................................... 121 

No. 36765: R277-423 Delivery of Flow Through Money ........................................................................................ 122 

No. 36766: R277-424 Indirect Costs for State Programs ....................................................................................... 122 

No. 36767: R277-426 Definition of Private and Non-Profit Schools for Federal Program 

Services ................................................................................................................................................................ 123 

No. 36768: R277-454 Construction Management of School Building Projects ...................................................... 123 

Financial Institutions 

Banks 

No. 36714: R333-7 Investment by a State-Chartered Bank in Shares of Open-End 

Investment Companies ........................................................................................................................................ 124 

Credit Unions 

No. 36713: R337-2 Conversion from a Federal to a State-Chartered Credit Union ............................................... 124 

No. 36712: R337-5 Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses - Credit Unions .......................................................... 125 

Natural Resources 

Wildlife Resources 

No. 36747: R657-12 Hunting and Fishing Accommodations for People With Disabilities ...................................... 125 

Transportation 

Preconstruction, Right-of-Way Acquisition 

No. 36756: R933-5 Utah-Federal Agreement for the Control of Outdoor Advertising ............................................ 126 

ii UTAH STATE BULLETIN, October 0I.2012. Vol. 2012. No. 19 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES ................................................................................................................................... 127 

RULES INDEX 

BY AGENCY (CODE NUMBER) 

AND 

BY KEYWORD (SUBJECT) ......................................................................................................................................................... 129 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, October 01. 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 iii 
NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES 

o erations were identified as a source of direct particulate 

e ·ssions; therefore, the Division of Air Quality began 

wo ing with the Association of General Contractors i 

Octo er 2011 to evaluate the efficiency and co t 

effect1 eness of different controls for the aggreg e 

proces ing industry. This rule addresses controls for nfugitive ources, including aggregate processing equip ent, 

concrete atch plants, and hot mix asphalt plants. 

OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: T e rule 

acity limits for aggregate processing e uipment 

I crushers will be required to meet opacity 

limit of 12%; I screens will be required to meet n opacity 

limit of 7%; an all conveyor transfer points will b required to 

meet an opacit limit of 7%. Concrete batch lant opacity 

limits are establi hed at 7% opacity. The fil rable PM2.5 

emission limit fro a hot mix asphalt plant ryer is 0.024 

grains per dscf. Fr November 1 to March , the production 

of material at hot mi asphalt plants is restri ed to 50% of the 

plant's rated capacity uring the times that acilities are using 

a fuel other than natur gas or liquified pe oleum gas. 

MATERIALS INCORPORAT 

ANTICIPATED COST OR S,A; NG TO: 

+ THE STATE BUDGET: A addi ·anal costs to administer 

this rule at the Division o Air Qua ·ty are expected to be 

minimal; therefore, there e no antic ated costs or savings 

to the state budget. 

+ LOCAL GOVERNME S: This rule oes not create any 

new requirements for I cal government; therefore there are 

no anticipated costs or avings. 

+ SMALL BUSINES S: Sources that a unable to meet 

the emission stand ds established in this ule will have to 

take action to m et them. There are everal control 

strategies a sour can choose to impleme t to meet the 

standard; therefqfe, it is difficult to estimate t e anticipated 

additional costs t6 small businesses. 

+ PERSONS/ OTHER THAN SMALL B INESSES, 

BUSINESS~,' OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL NTITIES: 

This rule ap 1es to all crushers, screens, conveyo , hot mix 

asphalt pla ts, and concrete batch plants. Ther are no 

anticipated costs or savings to persons other tha small 

businesse , businesses, or local government entities. 

COSTS FOR AFFECTED 

Sour that are unable to meet the emission stand ds 

estab shed in this rule will have to take action to meet the . 

Ther are several control strategies a source can choose 

imp ment to meet the standard; therefore, it is difficult t 

es mate the anticipated additional costs. 

/46 

DAR File No. 36740 

C MMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON 

Fl AL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINE 

Sou s that are unable to meet the emission sta dards 

estab hed in this rule will have to take action to me t them. 

There e several control strategies a source can oose to 

impleme to meet the standard; therefore, it is difficult to 

estimate t e anticipated additional costs this ru may have 

on business s. 

THE FULL T T OF THIS RULE MAY INSPECTED, 

DURING REGU R BUSINESS HOURS, 

ENVIRO MENTAL QUALITY 

AIR QUAL.:TY 

FOURTH FOOR 

195 N 1950 W 

SALT LAKE C~, UT 8411 -3085 

or at the Divisio\of Admi 1strative Rules. 

DIRECT QUESTIONS REG R ING THIS RULE TO: 

• Mark Berger by phone at 01-536-4000, by FAX at 801-

536-0085, or by Internet E- i t mberger@utah.gov 

INTERESTED SONS MAY ,A; END A PUBLIC 

HEARING REGA ING THIS RULE: 

:OO AM, Bridgerland A lied Technology 

600 W, Rooms 171 D and Logan, UT 

• 10/16/201 11 :00 AM, Mountainland ssociation of 

Governmen , 586 E 800 N, Orem, UT 

• 10/17/2 2 02:00 PM, Utah Department of vironmental 

Quality, 1 5 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT 

• 10/17 012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Envirpnmental 

Qualit, 195 N 1950W, Room No.1015, SLC, UT '\ 

RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 12/06/20\ 

UTHORIZED BY: Bryce Bird, Director 

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 

R307-312. Aggregate Processing Operations for PM2.5 

Non attainment Areas. 

R307-312-l. Purpose. 

R307-312 establishes emission standards for sources in 

the aggregate processing industry including aggregate processing 

eQuipmenl hot mix asphalt plants. and concrete batch plants, 

R307-312-2. Applicability. 

()) R307-312 applies to all crushers screens conyeyors 

hot mix asphalt plants and concrete batch plants located wjthin Box 

Elder. Cache Davis Salt Lake Tooele Utah. or Weber counties. 

(2\ The provisions of R307-312 do not aooly to 

temporary hot mix asphalt plants. 

R307-312-3. Definitions. 

The following definitions apply to R307-312: 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, October 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 
DAR File No. 36740 

"Concrete batch olant" means any facility used to 

manufacture concrete by mixing aggregate with cement. 

"Conveyor" means a device for transporting nonmetallic 

materials from one piece of equipment to another. 

"Crusher" means a machine used to crush any nonmetallic 

minerals. 

"Hot mix asphalt plant" means anY facility used to 

manufacture hot mix asphalt by heating and drying aggregate and 

mixing with asphalt cements. 

''Nonmetallic mineral" has the same definition as defined 

in 40 CFR 60.671. 

"Screen" means a device for separating nonmetallic 

minerals according to size by passing undersize material through 

one or more mesh surfaces in series. and retaining oversize material 

on the mesh surfaces. 

"Temporary" means not more than 180 operating days and 

not more than 365 calendar days. 

R307-312-4. Visible Emissions. 

(!) Visible emissions from sources subject to R307-312 

shall not exceed the opacity limits as specified in Table I. 

TABLE 1 

CATEGORY OPACITY LIMIT 

Crushers 12% 

Screens 7% 

Conveyor trans fer points 7% 

Concrete batch pl ants 7% 

(2) Opacity Observation. 

(a) Opacity observations of emissions shall be conducted 

according to 40 CFR 60 Appendix A. Method 9. 

8307-312-6. Compliance Schedule. 

(!) All sources subject to R307-3 l 2-4 or R307-312-5(2) 

shall be in compliance with this rule by June 7. 2013. 

C2l All sources subject to R307-312-5(J) that begin_ 

construction prior to June 7. 2013. shall submit test results 

demonstrating compliance with R307-312-5(1) to the director by 

December 14. 2015. 

(3) All sources subject to R307-312-5(1) that begin_ 

construction on or after June 7. 2013 shall submit test results 

demonstrating compliance with R307-312-5(1) to the director no 

later than 180 days after initial startup. 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, October 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 

NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES 

KEY: air pollution. aggregate. asphalt. concrete 

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: 2012 

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-101: 

19-2-104: 19-2-109 

Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

R307-334 

missions Standards: lndustri 

Baking Ovens 

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE 

(New Rule) 

DAR FILE NO.: 36739 

FILED: 09/06/2012 

RULE ANALYSIS 

THE RULE OR RE ON FOR THE 

CHANGE: In 06, EPA tightened t e 24-hour PM2.5 

national ambient air quality standar from 65 to 35 

micrograms per cu ·c meter. CurrentlY. seven Utah counties 

have been found by PA to not meet t is standard. Industrial 

baking ovens emit vol tile organic co pounds (VOCs), which 

are precursors to the rmation of M2.5. This rule for the 

PM2.5 state implement tion plan ill lower VOCs that are 

emitted from industrial king o ens by requiring them to 

implement control measur s. 

SUMMARY OF THE RULE CHANGE: This rule requires 

owners and operators of ind trial baking ovens that process 

yeast leavened products, h v a combin~d rated heat input 

capacity equal to or great tha three m1ll1on BTU per hour, 

and that have 25 tons p r year f voe emissions to use a 

control system that redu s voe missions by 90% or more. 

Owners and operators re also re uired to maintain records 

for a minimum of two ears that th control system is being 

operated and m ntained in ccordance with the 

manufacturer rec mendations a d is meeting the 

continuous emissi n reduction of 90%. The estimated cost 

on sources to co ply with this rule varie with EPA estimating 

the cost to be$ ,740 per ton of voes re oved while industry 

reporting the st wou Id be somewhere round $9, 735 per 

ton of VOC removed. That is why ring the public 

comment pe 1od, the division is asking for ost information 

from indust . The Division of Air Quality st ff will evaluate 

cost info ation received during the comme t period and 

make a r commendation to the Board. 

STATU ORY OR CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHOR! 

THIS ULE: Section 19-2-104 

AN ICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: 

+ HE STATE BUDGET: There may be a slight incr se in 

ministrative costs to enforce this rule; however, cos 

e minimal and will not result in increased costs to the 

budget. 
NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES 

A\ TICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: 

• E STATE BUDGET: The majority of the requirements in 

this ule were already found in the Utah Air Quality rule, Rul 

R30 340, which has been proposed to be repeale . 

There re, there are no anticipated costs or savings to e 

state dget. (DAR NOTE: The proposed repeal of ule 

R307-3 is under DAR No. 36725 is this issue, Octob r 1, 

2012, of e Bulletin.) 

• LOCAL OVERNMENTS: The majority of the requir ments 

in this rule were already found in the Utah Air Qua ty rule, 

Rule R307- 40, which has been proposed to be pealed. 

Therefore, th re are no anticipated costs or savin s to local 

government. 

• SMALL BU NESSES: Anticipated cost to sources is 

approximately $ 440 per ton voe removed. 

• PERSONS THER THAN SMALL SINESSES, 

BUSINESSES, 0 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, L ENTITIES: 

This rule applies to owners and operators of aper, film, and 

foil coatings operati ns that emit 2.7 tons f voe per year. 

There are no anticip ted costs or saving to persons other 

than small business , businesses, or local government 

entities. 

COMPLIANCE COSTS 

COMMENTS BY THE DE ART. ENT HEAD ON THE 

FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE A HAVE ON BUSINESSES: 

The cost to business to comply th this rule is approximately 

$1,440 per ton voe removed. 

DIRECT QUESTION REGARDING THIS 

• Mark Berger by hone at 801-536-4000, y FAX at 801-

536-0085, or by In rnet E-mail at mberger@u h.gov 

INTERESTED P RSONS MAY PRESENT THEI VIEWS ON 

THIS RULE B SUBMITIING WRITIEN COM ENTS NO 

LATER THAN T 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012 

INTEREST PERSONS MAY ATIEND 

HEARING EGARDING THIS RULE: 

• 10/15/2 12 11 :00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Tee ology 

College, 301 N 600 W, Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, 

• 10/1 /2012 11 :00 AM, Mountain land Associatio 

Gover ents, 586 E 800 N, Orem, UT 

• 10/1 /2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environme 

Qual' , 195 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT 

• 1 17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environment 

Qu lity, 195 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT 

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 

R307-344. Paper. Fjlm. and Foil Coatings. 

R307-344-I. Purpose. 

DAR File No. 36726 

The pumose of this rule is to limit volatile organic 

compound fVOCl emissions from roll knife. and rotogravure 

coaters and drying ovens of paper film. and foil coating operations, 

R307-344-2. Applicability. 

R307-344 applies to paper. film. and foil coating 

operations. including related cleaning activities that have the 

potential to emit 2,7 tons per year of voe and that are located in 

Box Elder. Cache Davis. Salt Lal<e. Tooele !Jtah and Weber 

~ 

R307-344-3. Definitions. 

The following additional definitions apply to R307-344: 

"Coating" means a protective. functional. or decorative 

film applied in a thin layer to a surface. This term often applies to 

paints such as lacquers or enamels. It is also used to refer to films 

applied to paper. plastics, or foil. 

"Foil coating" means a coating applied in a web coating 

process on any foil substrate other than paper or fabric including. 

but not limited to. typewriter ribbons photographic film. magnetic 

tape and metal foil gift wrap but excluding coatings applied to 

packaging used exclusively for food and health care products for 

human and animal consumption. 

"Knife coating" means the application of a coating 

material to a substrate by means of drawing the substrate beneath a 

blade that spreads the coating evenly over the width of the substrate. 

"Paper coating" means unifonn distribution of coatings 

put on paper. film foils and pressure sensitive tapes regardless of 

substrate, Related web coating processes on plastic film and 

decorative coatings on metal foil are included in this definition. 

Paper coating covers saturation operations as well as coating 

operations. 

"Roll coating" means the application of a coating material 

to a substrate by means of hard rubber or steel rolls 

"Roll printing" means the application of words designs 

and pictures to a substrate usually by means of a series of hard 

rubber or steel rolls each with only partial coverage. 

"Rotogravure coating" means the application of a uniform 

layer of material across the entire width of the web to substrate by 

means of a roll coating technique in which the pattern to be applied 

is etched on the coating roll. The coating material is picked up in 

these recessed areas and is transferred to the substrate, 

"Saturation" means dipping the web into a bath. 

"Web" means a continuous sheet of substrate, 

R307-344-4. Emission Standards. 

Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with a 

VOC content in excess of the amounts specified in Table 1 or shall 

use an add-on control device as specified in R307-344-6. 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, October 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 
DAR File No. 36726 

Paper. Film. and Foil Coating Limitations 

( va 1 ues in pounds voe per pound of coating. mi nus water. as app 1 i edl 

COATING CATEGORY voe EM I SS ION RATES 

Paper. film and foil 0.08 

Pressure sensitive tape 

and label o. 067 

8307-344-5. Work Practices and Recordkeeping. 

(!) Control techniqyes and work practices are to be 

implemented at all times to reduce voe emissions from fugitive 

type sources Control techniQues and work practices include: 

fa) Using tight fitting covers for open tanks: 

fb) Using covered containers for solvent wiping cloths: 

(c) Using collection hoods for areas where solvent is used 

for cleanup· 

Cd) Minimizing spills of VOC-containing cleaning 

materials: 

(el Conveying VOC-containing materials from one 

location to another in closed containers or pipes: 

m Cleaning spray g\l!1S in enclosed systems: and 

(g) Using recycled solvents for cleaning 

(2) The owner or operator shall maintain records from the 

manufacturer that demonstrate compliance with the emission 

standards of R307-344-4. 

8307-344-6. Optional Add-On Controls. 

(I) The owner or operator may install and maintain an 

incinerator. carbon adsorption or any other add-on emission control 

device. provided that the emission control device will attain at least 

90% efficiency performance. 

(2) The owner or operator of a control device shall_ 

provide certification from the manufacturer that the emission 

control system will attain reQuired efficiency perfonnance 

(3) Emission control systems shall be operated and 

maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. 

The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum of two years 

records of operating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that 

the eQUipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with 

the manufacturer recommendations. 

8307-344-7. Compliance Schedule. 

(I) All sources in Davis and Salt Lake CO\l!1ties are_ 

subject to this rule upon the effective date. 

(2) Sources in Box Elder Cache. Tooele Utah and Weber 

coynties shall be in compliance with the rule by January I. 2014. 

KEY: YOC emission. paper coating. film coating. foil coating 

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: 20 I 2 

Authorizing. and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-1040) 

(a} 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, October 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 

NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES 

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE 

(New Rule) 

DAR FILE NO.: 36727 

FILED: 09/06/2012 

RULE ANALYSIS 

PURP SE OF THE RULE OR REASON F R THE 

In 2006, EPA tightened the 24-h 

national ambient air quality standard from 

microgra s per cubic meter. Currently, seven ah counties 

have bee found by EPA to not meet this sta ard. Fabric 

and vinyl c ting operations emit volatile orga c compounds 

(VOCs), whi are precursors to the formation f PM2.5. This 

rule for the P 2.5 State Implementation Pia ·11 lower VOCs 

that are emitt from fabric and vinyl coati g operations, as 

well as clarify r ulatory requirements to th industry. 

SUMMARY OF E RULE OR CHAN : This rule applies 

to fabric and vi I coating operatic s, including related 

cleaning activities, at have the pote ial to emit 2.7 tons of 

volatile organic co ounds (VOC) er year and that are 

located in Box Elder, ache, Davis, alt Lake, Tooele, Utah, 

and Weber counties. The rul establishes reasonably 

available control techn logy req 1rements to reduce voe 

emissions. Owners and perator. have the option to reduce 

voes by applying coatin with e voe limits established in 

the rule or to use add-on ntr. Is to achieve at least a 90% 

VOC reduction. During th blic comment period, the Air 

Quality Board is reque ting public input on the 

appropriateness of applying ·s rule in Tooele and Box Elder 

counties. 

ANTICIPATED COST R SAVINGS 0: 

• THE STATE BUD T: The majori of the requirements in 

this rule were alrea y found in the Ut Air Quality rule, Rule 

R307-340, which has been propo d to be repealed. 

Therefore, there re no anticipated co ts or savings to the 

state budget. ( AR NOTE: The prop sed repeal of Rule 

R307-340 is u er DAR No. 36725 is thi issue, October 1, 

2012, of the B letin.) 

+ LOCAL GO ERNMENTS: The majority o he requirements 

in this rule ere already found in the Utah ir Quality rule, 

Rule R307 0, which has been proposed be repealed. 

Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or s vings to local 

governm nt. 

• SMA BUSINESSES: Anticipated cost to sources is 

$3,500 er ton voe removed. 

+ P SONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUS ESSES, 

BUS ESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL TITIES: 

Thi rule applies to fabric and vinyl coatings operat1 ns that 

e . 2. 7 tons of VOC per year. There are no ant ipated 

c ts or savings to persons other than small busin sses, 

sinesses, or local government entities. 

67 
NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES 

C PLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: 

com liance cost to implement the requirements of this rule s 

appro imately $3,500 per ton voe removed. 

COMM TS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD 0 

FISCAL I PACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSI 

The cost to usiness to comply with this rule is app 

$3,500 pert voe removed. 

THE FULL TE T OF THIS RULE MAY BE 

DURING REGU R BUSINESS HOURS, AT: 

ENVIRO ENTAL QUALITY 

AIR QUAL 

FOURTH FL.: OR 

195 N 1950 

SALT LAKE Cl 

INTERESTED PERSONS 'AY P 

THIS RULE BY SUBMI 

LATER THAN AT 5:00 P 

INTERESTED PE A PUBLIC 

HEARING REGAR 

+ 10/15/2012 11: 0 AM, Bridgerland A 

College, 1301 N 00 W, Rooms 171 D and 

+ 10/16/2012 11 :00 AM, Mountainland 

Governments 86 E 800 N, Orem, UT 

+ 10/17/201 02:00 PM, Utah Department of vironmental 

Quality, 19 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT 

+ 10/17/ 12 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Env1 

Quality, 95 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT 

ULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 

R307-345. Fabric and Vinyl Coatings. 

R307-345-1. Purpose. 

The puroose of this rule is to limit volatile organic 

compound CVOC) emissions from fabric and vinyl coating 

operations. 

R307-345-2. Applicability. 

R307-345 applies to fabric and vinyl coating operations. 

including related cleaning activities. which use roll. knife or 

rotogravure coaters and drying ovens that have the potential to emit 

2.7 tons per year ofYOC and that are located in Box Elder. Cache. 

Davis Salt Lake. Tooele. Utah and Weber counties. 

R307-345-3. Definitions. 

The following additional definitions apply to R307-345: 

68 

DAR File No. 36727 

"Coating" means a protective. functional. or decorative 

film applied in a thin layer to a surface including lacquers enamels. 

latexes. acrylics. polyYinyl chloride. polyurethanes. natural and 

synthetic rubbers. It also applies to films applied to paper. plastics. 

m:..fui.L. 

"Fabric coating" means the coating or saturation of a 

textile substrate with a knife. roll or rotogravure coater to impart 

characteristics that are not initially present. such as strength. 

stabilitv. water or acid repellency. or appearance. Fabric coatings 

can include. but are not limited to industrial and electrical tapes. tie 

cord utility meter seals. imitation leathers. taroaulins. shoe 

material. and upholstery fabrics 

"Knife coating" means the application of a coating 

material to a substrate by means of drawing the substrate beneath a 

blade that spreads the coating evenly over the width of the substrate. 

"Roller coating" the coating material is applied to the 

moving fabric. in a direction opposite to the movement of the 

substrate. by hard rubber or steel rolls 

"Rotogravure coating" means the application of a uniform 

layer of material across the entire width of the web to substrate by 

means of a roll coating technique in which the pattern to be applied 

is etched on the coating roll. The coating material is picked up in. 

these recessed areas and is transferred to the substrate, 

"Vinyl coating" means applying a decorative or protective 

top coat. or printing on vinyl coated fabric or vinyl sheets. 

R307-345-4. Emission Standards. 

(I) Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with. 

a VOC content in excess of the amounts specified in Table I or shall 

use an add-on control device as specified in R307-345-6. 

TABLE 1 

Fabric and Vinyl Coating Limitations 

(values in pounds voe per gallon of coating. minus water. as applied) 

COATING CATEGTORY voe EMISSION RATES 

Fabric 2.9 

Vin 1 3.8 

(2) Organosol and plastisol coatings shall not be used to. 

bubble emissions from vinyl printing and top coating. 

R307-345-5. Work Practices and Recordkeeping. 

(I l Control techniques and work practices are to be 

implemented at all times to reduce voe emissions from fugitive 

type sources. Control techniques and work practices include: 

(a) Tight fitting covers for open tanks or <lrums: 

Cb) Covered containers for solvent wiping cloths; 

(c) Collection hoods for areas where solvent is used for. 

fdl Covered mixing tanks: and 

(e) Covered hoods and oven routed to add-on control 

devices which may include. but are not limited to. after burners. 

thermal incinerators catalytic oxidation. or carbon adsorption. 

(2) The owner or operator shall maintain records from the 

manufacturer that demonstrate compliance with the emission 

standards ofR307-348-4, 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, October 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 
DAR File No. 36727 

8307-345-6. Optional Add-On Controls. 

The owner or operator may install and maintain an 

incinerator. carbon adsorption or any other add-on emission control 

device. provided that the emission control deyice will attain at least 

90% efficiency performance. 

(2) The owner or operator of a control device shall_ 

provide certification from the manufacturer that the emission 

control system will attain required efficiency performance. 

(3) Emission control systems shall be operated and 

maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. 

The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum of two years 

records of operating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that 

the equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with 

the manufacturer recommendations. 

R307-345-7. Compliance Schedule. 

( 1) All sources in Davis and Salt Lake counties are 

subject to this rule upon the effective date. 

(2) All sources within Box Elder. Cache. Tooele. Utah 

and Weber counties shall be in compliance with this rule by January 

1.2014. 

KEY: air pollution. emission controls. fabric coating. vinyl 

.ma.ting 

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: 2012 

Authorizing. and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104Cl) 

w 

Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

R307-346 

TICE OF PROPOSED RU 

(New Rule) 

AR FILE NO.: 3672 

LED: 09/06/201 

R 

PURPOSE OF THE 

CHANGE: In 2006, 

SUMMARY THE RULE OR CHANGE: This le applies 

to metal fu iture surface coating operations, includ related 

cleaning ctivities, that have the potential to emit 2. tons of 

volatile organic compounds (VOC) per year and th are 

locat in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele, ah, 

Weber counties. The rule establishes reasona 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, October 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 

NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES 

available control technology requirements to reduce V C 

missions. Owners and operators have the option to red ce 

Cs by applying coatings with the VOC limits establish d in 

th rule or to use add-on controls to achieve at least 90% 

V reduction. During the public comment period, e Air 

Qua "ty Board is requesting public input the 

appr riateness of applying this rule in Tooele and x Elder 

counti s. 

STATU RY OR CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHOR! 

THIS RU E: Subsection 19-2-104(1)(a) 

D COST OR SAVINGS TO: 

+ THE STA BUDGET: The majority of the equirements in 

this rule wer already found in the Utah Air uality rule, Rule 

R307-340, ich has been proposed o be repealed. 

Therefore, ther are no anticipated costs or savings to the 

state budget. AR NOTE: The propo ed repeal of Rule 

R307-340 is und r DAR No. 36725 is t s issue, October 1, 

2012, of the Bullet .) 

+ LOCAL GOVERN ENTS: The majo ty of the requirements 

in this rule were air ady found in th Utah Air Quality rule, 

Rule R307-340, whi has been pr. posed to be repealed. 

Therefore, there are n anticipated costs or savings to local 

government. 

+ SMALL BUSINESSE : Anti pated cost to sources is 

$2,020 per ton voe remo ed. 

+ PERSONS OTHER TH 

BUSINESSES, OR LOCA 

This rule applies to metal 

SMALL BUSINESSES, 

OVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: 

emit 2.7 tons of VOC per ar. There are no anticipated 

costs or savings to perso s ther than small businesses, 

businesses, or local gove en entities. 

COMMENTS BY E DEPARTM T HEAD ON THE 

FISCAL IMPACT T E RULE MAY HA E ON BUSINESSES: 

The cost to busine s to comply with this ule is approximately 

$2,020 per ton V removed. 

THE FULL TE T OF THIS RULE MAY E INSPECTED, 

DURING REG LAR BUSINESS HOURS, A · 

ENV ONMENTAL QUALITY 

Al UALITY 

F RTH FLOOR 

1 5 N 1950 W 

ALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-3085 

rat the Division of Administrative Rules. 

QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE T 

+ Ma Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-

536- 085, or by Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov 

IN ERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEW ON 

T IS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS 0 

JER THAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012 
NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES 

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 

R307-346. Metal Furniture Surface Coatings. 

R307-346-1. Purpose. 

The pumose of this rule is to limit volatile organic 

comoound CVOC) emissions from metal furniture surface coating 

operations. 

R307-346-2. Applicability. 

R307-346 applies to the application areas flash-off areas. 

and ovens of metal furniture coating lines involved in prime and 

top-coat or single coat operations. including related cleaning 

activities. that have the potential to emit 2. 7 tons per year of voe' 

and that are located in Box Elder. Cache. Davis. Salt Lake. Tooele .. 

Utah and Weber counties. 

R307-346-3. Exemptions. 

m The requirements of R307-346 do not apply to the. 

following: 

(a) Stencil coatings: 

Cb) Safety-indicating coatings: 

(c) Solid-film lubrican(S: 

(dl Electrical-insulating and thermal-conducting coatings: 

(e) Touch-up and repair coatings: or 

(f) Coating applications utilizing hand-held aerosol cans. 

R307-346-4. Definitions. 

"Air dried coating" means coatings that are dried by the 

use of air or a forced warm air at temperatures up to 194 degrees 

Fahrenheit. 

"Application area" means the area where the coating is 

applied by spraying. dipping. or flow coating techniques. 

"Baked coating" means a coating that is cured at a 

temperature at or above 194 degrees Fahrenheit. 

"Coating" means a protective. functional. or decorative 

film applied in a thin layer to a surface. This term applies to pain(S. 

sealants. caulks. inks. adhesives and maskan(S. 

"Extreme performance coatings" means coatings designed 

for harsh exposure or extreme environmental conditions. 

"Maskants" means a material that protects a metal surface 

during the etching process. 

"Metal furniture coating" means the surface coating of 

any furniture made of metal or anY metal Part that will be assembled 

70 

DAR File No. 36728 

with other metal wood fabric plastic. or glass parts to form a 

furniture piece. 

R307-346-5. Emission Standards. 

Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with a 

VOC content in excess of the amounts specified in Table I or shall. 

use an add-on control device as specified in R307-346-7. 

METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING voe LIMITS 

(values in pounds of VOC per gallon Of coating. minus water, as applie 

gi 

COATING CATEGORY voe EMISSION RATE 

Baked Air Dried 

Genera 1 , One CQ!]ponent 2. 3 2. 3 

General, Multi-Component 2. 3 2.8 

Extreme High Gloss 3.0 2.8 

Extreme Performance 3.0 3. 5 

Heat Resistant 3.0 3. 5 

Metallic 3. 5 3. 5 

Pretreatment Coatings 3.5 3. 5 

Solar Absorbent 3. 0 3. 5 

R307-346-6. Work Practices. 

(1) The owner or operator shall: 

Ca) Store all VOC-containing coatings thinners. and 

cleaning materials in closed containers: 

fb) Minimize spills ofVOC-containing coatings. thinners. 

and cleaning materials: 

(cl Clean up spills immediately: 

fdl Convey any coatings. thinners. and cleaning materials 

in closed containers or pipes: 

(el Close mixing vessels that contain VOC coatings and 

other materials exceot when specifically in use: and 

ID Minimize usage of solvents during cleaning of 

storage mixing. and conveying equipment. 

(2) The owner or operator shall maintain records from the 

manufacturer that demonstrates compliance with the emission 

standards ofR307-348-4. 

R307-346-7. Optional Add-On Controls. 

fl I The owner or operator mav install and maintain an 

incinerator. carbon adsorption. or any other add-on emission control 

device provided that the emission control device will attain at least 

90% efficiency performance. 

(2) The owner or operator of a control device shall_ 

provide certification from the manufacturer that the emission 

control system will attain req_uired efficiency performance. 

(3) Emission control systems shall be operated and 

maintained in accordance with the manufacturer reco1mnendations. 

The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum of two years 

records of operating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, October OJ, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 
DAR File No. 36728 

the equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with 

the manufacturer recommendations. 

R307-346-8. Compliance Schedule. 

(I) All sources in Davis and Salt Lake counties are_ 

subject to this rule as of the effective date 

(2) Sources in Box Elder. Cache Utah. Tooele. and 

Weber counties shall be in compliance with the rule by January I 

2014. 

KEY: air pollution. emission controls. surface coatin~. metal 

furniture 

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: 2012 

Authorizin~. and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(1) 

.(JU 

Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

R307-347 

ge Appliance Surface Coatin 

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE 

(New Rule) 

DAR FILE NO.: 36729 

FILED: 09/06/2012 

RULE ANALYSIS 

PURPOSE OF E RULE OR RE SON FOR THE 

CHANGE: In 200 EPA tightened e 24-hour PM2.5 

national ambient ai quality stand d from 65 to 35 

micrograms per cubic ter. Current , seven Utah counties 

have been found by ER to not m t this standard. Large 

appliance surface coatin operati ns emit volatile organic 

compounds (VOCs), which e pr cursors to the formation of 

PM2.5. This rule for the P . State Implementation Plan 

will lower voes that are emitte from large appliance surface 

coating operations, as well a c rify regulatory requirements 

to the industry. 

SUMMARY OF THE RU OR CH GE: This rule applies 

to large appliance su ace coating operati~ns, incl~ding 

related cleaning activiti s, that have th potential to emit 2.7 

tons of volatile organ(i compounds (VO ) per year and that 

are located in Box /Ider, Cache, Davis, alt Lake, Tooele, 

Utah and Weber c6unties. The rule esta ·shes reasonably 

avail~ble control echnology requirements reduce voe 

emissions. O rs and operators have the o tion to reduce 

voes by apply' g coatings with the voe limits stablished in 

the rule or to se add-on controls to achieve at ast a 90% 

VOC reduct' n. During the public comment pen d, the Air 

Quality ard is requesting public input on the 

appropria ness of applying this rule in Tooele and B Elder 

co untie 

STAT TORY OR CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORIZATION 

THI RULE: Subsection 19-2-104(1 )(a) 

TAH STATE BULLETIN, October 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 

NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES 

NTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: 

+ THE STATE BUDGET: The majority of the requiremen 

th rule were already found in the Utah Air Quality rule, ule 

R3 7-340, which has been proposed to be rep aled. 

The fore, there are no anticipated costs or savings o the 

state udget. (DAR NOTE: The proposed repeal f Rule 

R307- 40 is under DAR No. 36725 is this issue, 0 ober 1, 

2012, the Bulletin.) 

+ LOCA GOVERNMENTS: The majority of the re uirements 

in this ru were already found in the Utah Air uality rule, 

Rule R30 -340, which has been proposed to e repealed. 

Therefore, ere are no anticipated costs or s ings to local 

government. 

+ SMALL B SINESSES: Anticipated cos to sources is 

$2,020 per to voe removed . 

+ PERSONS OTHER THAN SMAL BUSINESSES, 

BUSINESSES, R LOCAL GOVERNM NTAL ENTITIES: 

This rule applies o fabric and vinyl coat' gs operations that 

emit 2.7 tons of QC per year. Ther are no anticipated 

costs or savings t persons other th n small businesses, 

businesses, or local overnment entiti . 

COMMENTS BY THE EPA TMENT HEAD ON THE 

FISCAL IMPACT THE RUI.; M Y HAVE ON BUSINESSES: 

The cost to business to com I with this rule is approximately 

$2,020 per ton voe remove 

DIRECT QUEST! S REGARDING TH RULE TO: 

+ Mark Berger b phone at 801-536-40 0, by FAX at 801-

536-0085, or by ternet E-mail at mberge utah.gov 

INTERESTED ERSONS MAY PRESENT T EIR VIEWS ON 

THIS RULE Y SUBMITTING WRITTEN C MMENTS NO 

LATER THA AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012 

INTEREST. D PERSONS MAY ATTEND PUBLIC 

HEARIN REGARDING THIS RULE: 

+ 10/15/. 012 11 :00 AM, Bridgerland Applied echnology 

College 1301 N 600 W, Rooms 171 D and E, Loga , UT 

+ 10/ 6/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Assoc tion of 

Gove ments, 586 E 800 N, Orem, UT 

+ 10 7/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Enviro 

Qu ity, 195 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT 

+ /17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environ 

ality, 195 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT 

71 
NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES 

8307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 

8307-347. Large Appliance Surface Coatings. 

R307-347-1. Purpose. 

The purpose of this rule is to reduce yolatile organic 

compound IVOC) emissions from large appliance surface coating 

operations. 

R307-347-2. Applicability. 

R307-347 applies to lame appliance coating operations 

including related cleaning activities. that have the potential to emit 

2.7 tons a year of voe and that are located in Box Elder. Cache 

Davis Salt Lake Tooele. Utah and Weber counties. 

R307-347-3. Exemptions. 

(!) The requirements of R307-347 do not apply to the. 

following: 

(al Stencil coatings· 

(b) Safety-indicating coatings: 

(cl Solid-film lubricants: 

(dl Electric-insulating and thermal-conducting coatings: 

(el Touch-up and repair coatings· or 

<O Coating ap,plication utilizing hand-held aerosol cans 

8307-347-4. Definitions. 

The following additional definitions apply to R307-347· 

"Air dried coating" means coatings that are dried by the 

use of air or a forced warm air at temperatures up to 194 degrees 

Fahrenheit 

"Baked coating" means a coating that is cured at a 

temperature at or above 198 degrees Fahrenheit 

"Coating" means a protective. functional. or decorative 

film applied in a thin layer to a surface. This term often applies to 

paints such as lacquers or enamels. It is also used to refer to films 

applied to paper. plastics or foil 

"Extreme performance coatings" means coatings designed 

for harsh exposure or extreme environmental conditions. 

"Large appliances" means doors. cases lids panels. and 

interior support parts of residential and commercial washers dryers. 

ranges refrigerators. freezers water heaters. dishwashers. trash 

compactors. air conditioners and other similar products. 

R307-347-5. Emission Standards. 

Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with a 

vOC content in excess of the amounts specified in Table I or shall. 

use an add-on control device as specified in R307-347-7. 

Large Appliance Coating Limitations 

(values in pounds voe per gallon of coating. mjnus water. as applied) 

COATING CATEGORY voe EMISSION RATES 

Baked Air Oried 

General . one component 2.3 2.3 

72 

DAR File No. 36729 

General • multi -component 2. 3 2.8 

Extreme high gloss 3.0 2.8 

Extreme performance 3.0 3.5 

Heat resistance 3.0 3. 5 

Solar absorbent 3.0 3.5 

Metallic 3.5 3.5 

Pretreatment coatings 3.5 3. 5 

R307-347-6. Work Practices and Recordkeeping. 

I I l The owner or operator shall: 

la) Store all voe-containing coatings. thinners. and 

cleaning materials in closed containers: 

(bl Minimize spills ofVOC-containing coatings thinners 

and cleaning materials: 

lcl Clean up spills immediately· 

ldl Convey anY coatings. thinners. and cleaning materials 

in closed containers or pipes· 

lel Close mixing vessels that contain VOC coatings and 

other materials except when specifically in use: and 

<O Minimize usage of solvents during cleaning of 

storage mixing and conveying equipment 

(2) The owner or operator shall maintain records from the 

manufacturer that demonstrates compliance with the emission 

standards ofR307-348-5 

8307-347-7. Optional Add-On Controls. 

I I l The owner or operator may install and maintain an 

incinerator carbon adsorption. or any other add-on emission control 

device proyided that the emission control deyice will attain at least 

90% efficiency performance. 

· (2) The owner or operator of a control device shall_ 

provide certification from the manufacturer that the emission 

control system will attain required efficiency performance. 

(3) Emission control systems shall be operated and 

maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. 

The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum of two years 

records of operating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that 

the equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with 

the manufacturer recommendations. 

8307-347-8. Compliance Schedule. 

(I) All sources in Davis and Salt Lal<e counties are 

subject to this rule as of the effective date of this rule. 

(2) Sowces in Box Elder. Cache Tooele. Utah and Weber 

counties shall be in compliance with this rule by January I 2014. 

KEY: air pollution. emission controls. large appliance. surface 

~ 

Date ofEnactment or Last Substantive Amendment: 2012 

Authorizing. and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(1) 

Lal 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, October 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 
DAR File No. 36730 

Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

R307-348 

Magnet Wire Coatings 

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE 

(New Rule) 

DAR FILE NO.: 36730 

FILED: 09/06/2012 

RULE ANALYSIS 

PURPOSE THE RULE OR REASON FOR THE 

CHANGE: In 2006, EPA tightened the 2 hour PM2.5 

national ambie t air quality standard fro 65 to 35 

micrograms per bic meter. Currently, seve Utah counties 

have been found EPA to not meet this s ndard. Magnet 

wire coating oper tions emit volatile or anic compounds 

(VOCs}, which are p cursors to the forma on of PM2.5. This 

rule for the PM2.5 St te Implementation an will lower VOCs 

that are emitted from agnet wire coati operations, as well 

as clarify regulatory req irements to the ndustry. 

SUMMARY OF THE RU E OR CH GE: This rule applies 

to r:n~~net wire coating op rations, i eluding related cleaning 

act1v1t1es, that have the po ential t emit 2.7 tons of volatile 

organic compounds (VOC) er y r and that are located in 

Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Sal La , Tooele, Utah, and Weber 

counties. The rule establish easonably available control 

technology requirements to re ce VOC emissions. Owners 

and .opera~ors have the optic reduce voes by applying 

coatings with the voe limits st lished in the rule or to use 

add-on controls to achieve at le t a 90% voe reduction. 

During the public comme perio the Air Quality Board is 

requesti~g public input o the ap opriateness of applying 

this rule in Tooele and Bo Elder cou ies. 

ANTICIPATED COS OR SAVINGS TO: 

+THE STATE BU ET: The majority oft e requirements in 

this rule were alre dy found in the Utah Air uality rule, Rule 

R307-340, whic has been proposed t be repealed. 

Therefore, ther are no anticipated costs or savings to the 

state budget. DAR NOTE: The proposed peal of Rule 

R307-340 is der DAR No. 36725 is this issu , October 1, 

2012, of the ulletin.) 

~ LO.CAL G VERNMENTS: The majority of the r uirements 

in this rule were already found in the Utah Air Q ality rule 

Rule R30 -340, which has been proposed to be epealed'. 

Therefor , there are no anticipated costs or saving to local 

govern ent. 

+ SM L BUSINESSES: Anticipated cost to sou 

$6,56 per ton voe removed. 

RSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINES ES 

INESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITI s: 

Th'. rule applies to fabric and vinyl coatings operations t t 

e 1t 2.7 tons of VOC per year. There are no anticipat 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, October 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 

NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES 

sts or savings to persons other than small busines s 

b inesses, or local government entities. ' 

LIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSON . The 

comp nee cost to implement the requirements oft s rule is 

approx1 ately $6,560 per ton voe removed. 

COMME S BY THE DEPARTMENT HEA ON THE 

FISCAL IM CT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON SINESSES: 

The cost to b'usiness to comply with this rule i approximately 

$6,560 per to~OC removed. 

THE FULL TEX' OF THIS RULE MA)) BE INSPECTED, 

DURING REGULA BUSINESS HOUR AT 

ENVIRON ENTAL QUALITY , . 

AIR QUALi 

FOURTH FL R 

195 N 1950 W \ 

SALT LAKE ci-r\~T 84 6-3085 

or at the Division °'\Ad nistrative Rules. 

DIRECT QUESTIONS REGA ING THIS RULE TO: 

+ Mark Berger by phone a 8 1-536-4000, by FAX at 801-

536-0085, or by Internet E- ail ~;;,-berger@utah.gov 

INTERESTED PERSON MAY PR\SENT THEIR VIEWS ON 

THIS RULE BY SUB TTING WR~~N COMMENTS NO 

LATER THAN AT 5:0 MON 10/31/2~2 

INTERESTED P SONS MAY A END A PUBLIC 

HEARING REGA DING THIS RULE: 

+ 10/15/2012 :00 AM, Bridgerland Ap lied Technology 

College, 1301 600 W, Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, UT 

+ 10/16/201 11 :00 AM, Mountainland ssociation of 

Governmen , 586 E 800 N, Orem, UT 

+ 10/17 /20 2 02:00 PM, Utah Department of E ironmental 

Quality, 1 5 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT 

+ 10/17l 012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Envi~mental 

Qualit~ 195 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT 

THI RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 12/06/201 

THORIZED BY: Bryce Bird, Director 

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 

R307-348. Magnet Wire Coatings. 

R307-348-1. Purpose. 

The pumose of this rule is to limit volatile organic 

comp~und <VOC) emissions from ovens of magnet wire coating 

operations. 

R307-348-2. Applicability. 

R307-348 applies to magnet wire coating operations that 

have the potential to emit 2. 7 tons per year of voe and are located 

in Box Elder. Cache. Davis. Salt Lake. Tooele. Utah and Weber 

counties. 

73 
NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES 

8307-348-3. Definitions. 

The following additional definition applies to R307-348: 

"Magnet wire coating" means the process of applying 

coating of electrical insulating varnish or enamel to aluminum or. 

copper wire for use in electrical machinery. 

8307-348-4. Emission Standards. 

(() No owner or operator of a magnet wire coating oven 

may cause allow or permit discharge into the atmosphere of anY 

VOCs in excess of 0 20 kilograms per liter of coating f I. 7 pounds 

per gallon) excluding water delivered to the coating applicator 

from magnet wire coating qperations. 

(al Equivalency calculations for cqatings shall be 

performed in units Qf pQUnds V0Cs per gallon Qf SQlid rather than 

PQunds voes per gallQn Qf CQating when determining CQmpliance. 

(b) The equivalent emission limit is 2 2 pounds voes per 

gallon solids. 

(2) The emjssiqn limitatiqns specified abqve shall be 

achieved by· 

fal The application of low solvent cqntent cqating 

technology: Qr 

(bl The use of an add-Qn control device as specified in 

R307-348-6. 

8307-348-5. Work Practices and Recordkeeping. 

(]) The owner or operator shall: 

(a) Store all VOC-cqntaining coatings and cleaning 

materials in clqsed cqntainers: 

(bl Minimize spills of voe-containing CQatings and 

cleaning materials: 

(cl Clean up spills immediately; 

fdl Cqnvey anY coatings thinners and cleaning materials 

in clqsed containers or pipes: 

(e) Close mixing vessels that CQntain voe CQatings and 

other materials except when specifically in use: and 

(Q Minimize usage of sqlvents during cleaning of 

stqrage mixing and conveying eQuipment. 

(2) The owner or operalQr shall maintain records from the 

manufacturer that demqnstrate compliance with the emissiqn 

standards qfR307-348-4 

8307-348-6. Optional Add-On Controls. 

( 1) The owner m Qperatqr may install and maintain an 

incinerator provided that the emissiqn control device will attain at 

least 90% efficiency performance 

(2) The qwner or Qperator Qf a cQntrol device shall_ 

provide certification from the manufacturer that the emissiqn 

control system will attain reQJ.!ired efficiency oerformance 

f3) Emissiqn cqntrol systems shall be Qperated and 

maintained in accqrdance with the manufacturer recomroendatiqns. 

The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum of two years 

records of operating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that 

the equipment is being Qperated and maintained in accordance with 

the manufacturer recommendations. 

R307-348-7. Compliance Schedule. 

(() All SQurces in Davis and Salt Lake CQunties are_ 

subject tQ this rule as of the effective date of this rule. 

74 

DAR File No. 36730 

(2) Sources in Box Elder. Cache Utah. Tooele. and 

Weber counties shall be in compliance with this rule by Januarv I. 

2014. 

KEY: air pollution. emission controls. surface coatini:. mai:net 

lYi.u 

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: 2012 

Authorizini:. and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104<1) 

w 

Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

R307-349 

Flat Wood Panel Coatings 

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE 

(New Rule) 

DAR FILE NO.: 36731 

FILED: 09/06/2012 

RULE ANALYSIS 

THE RULE OR REA ON FOR THE 

CHANGE: In 06, EPA tightened t e 24-hour PM2.5 

national ambient air quality standar from 65 to 35 

micrograms per cub meter. Current!>: seven Utah counties 

have been found by A to not meet t s standard. Flat wood 

panel coating operati ns emit vol le organic compounds 

(VOCs), which are prec rsors to th ormation of PM2.5. This 

rule for the PM2.5 State plemen tion Plan will lower VOCs 

that are emitted from flat ood nel coating operations, as 

well as clarify regulatory re ents to the industry. 

SUMMARY OF THE RULE CHANGE: This rule applies 

to flat wood panel coati perations, including related 

cleaning activities, that ha th potential to emit 2.7 tons of 

volatile organic compou ds (V C) per year and that are 

located in Box Elder, C che, Dav , Salt Lake, Tooele, Utah 

and Weber counties. The rule establishes reasonably 

available control tee nology requir ents to reduce voe 

emissions. Owners nd operators ha e the option to reduce 

voes by applying atings with the v limits established in 

the rule or to use add-on controls to ac ieve at least a 90% 

VOC reduction. During the public com ent period, the Air 

Quality Boar is requesting public input on the 

appropriatene s of applying this rule in Too e and Box Elder 

counties. 

STATUTO Y OR CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHOR 

THIS RU E: Subsection 19-2-104(1)(a) 

ANTI ATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: 

+TH STATE BUDGET: The majority of the requir ents in 

this le were already found in the Utah Air Quality ru , Rule 

R 7-340, which has been proposed to be re aled. 

T erefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings the 

tate budget. (DAR NOTE: The proposed repeal of ule 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, October 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 
DAR File No. 36731 

R 07-340 is under DAR No. 36725 is this issue, October 1, 

20 2, of the Bulletin.) 

+ L CAL GOVERNMENTS: The majority of the requirement 

in th rule were already found in the Utah Air Quality rul , 

Rule 307-340, which has been proposed to be repeal 

Theref e, there are no anticipated costs or saviogs to I cal 

nt. 

+ SMAL BUSINESSES: Anticipated cost to sour s is 

$2,110 pe ton voe removed. 

+ PERS S OTHER THAN SMALL BUSIN SSES, 

BUSINESS , OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL E TITIES: 

This rule ap ·es to flat wood panel coatings aper ions that 

emit 2.7 tons f VOC per year. There are no nticipated 

costs or savin s to persons other than small 

businesses, or I al government entities. 

compliance cost to · plement the requireme 

approximately $2, 11 per ton voe removed. 

THE FULL TEXT OF THI 

DURING REGULAR BUSIN SS H 

ENVIRONMENTAL 

AIR QUALITY 

FOURTH FLOOR 

195 N 1950 W 

SALT LAKE CITY, UT 

or at the Division of mi 'strative Rules. 

ON THE 

THEIR VIEWS ON 

COMMENTS NO 

INTERESTED P A PUBLIC 

HEARING REGA ING THIS RULE: 

+ 10/15/2012 1 :00 AM, Bridgerland Appli Technology 

College, 1301 N 00 W, Rooms 171 D and E, L gan, UT 

+ 10/16/2012 11 :00 AM, Mountainland As ciation of 

Governments, 86 E 800 N, Orem, UT 

+ 10/17/201 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Env onmental 

Quality, 195 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT 

+ 10/17/20 2 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Envir mental 

Quality, 1 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT 

RIZED BY: Bryce Bird, Director 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, October 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 

NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES 

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 

R307-349. Flat Wood Panel Coatings. 

R307-349-1. Purpose. 

The puroose of R307-349 is to limit volatile organic 

compound <YOC) emissions from flat wood paneling coating 

filll!!:lli... 

R307-349-2. Applicability. 

R307-349 applies to flat wood paneling coating 

operations. including related cleaning activities that have the 

potential to emit 2. 7 tons per year of voe and that are located in. 

Box Elder. Cache. Davis. Salt Lake. Tooele. Utah and Weber 

counties. 

R307-349-3. Definitions. 

The following additional definitions apply to R307-349: 

"Coating" means a protective. decorative. or functional 

material applied in a thin layer to a surface Such materials may 

include paints. topcoats. varnishes. sealers. stains. washcoats. 

basecoats. inks. and temoorruy protective coatings. 

"Finishing material" means a coating used in the flat wood 

panel industrv. including basecoats. stains. washcoats. sealers. and 

~ 

"Flat wood paneling" means wood paneling products that 

are any decorative interior. exterior or tileboard £class I hardboard) 

panel to which a protective. decorative. or functional material or 

layer has been applied. 

"Sealer" means a finishing material used to seal the pores 

of a wood substrate before additional coats of finishing material are 

applied A washcoat used to optimize aesthetics is not a sealer. 

"Tileboard" means a premium interior wall paneling 

product made of hardboard that meets the specifications for Class I 

given by the standard ANSI/AHA A 135.4-1995. 

R307-349-4. Emission Standards. 

(J) Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with. 

a voe content in excess of 2.1 pounds of voe per gallon 

excluding water. The equivalent emission limit shall be 2.9 pounds 

voes per gallon solids coating· or 

£2) Each owner or operator shall use an add-on control_ 

device as specified in R307-349-6. 

R307-349-5. Work Practice and Record keeping. 

fl) The owner or operator shall: 

fa) Store all VOC-containing coatings. thinners. and 

cleaning materials in closed containers: 

fb) Minimize spills ofVOC·containing coatings. thinners. 

and cleaning materials: 

(c) Clean up spills immediately: 

(d) Convey anY coatings. thinners and cleaning materials 

in closed containers or pipes; 

fe) Close mixing vessels that contain VOC coatings and 

other materials except when specifically in use: and 

<O Minimize usage of solvents during cleaning of 

storage mixing and conveying ofeguipment. 

(2) The owner or qperator shall maintain records from the 

manufacturer that demqnstrate compliance with the emission 

standards of R307-348-4. 

75 
NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES 

R307-349-6. Optional Add-On Controls. 

( I l The owner or operator may install and maintain an 

incinerator carbon adsor:ption. or any other add-on emission control 

device. provided that the emission control device will attain at least 

90% efficiency performance. 

(2) The owner or operator of a control deyice shall_ 

provide certification from the manufacturer that the emission 

control system will attain required efficiency perfonnaoce. 

(3) Emission control systems shall be operated and 

maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recomroendatjons. 

The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum of two years 

records of operating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that 

the equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with 

the manufacturer recommendations. 

R307-349-7. Compliance Schedule. 

(!) All sources in Davis and Salt Lake counties are 

subject to this rule as of the effective date of this rule. 

(2! Sources in Box Elder Cache. Tooele Utah and Weber 

counties shall be in compliance with this rule by January I. 2014. 

KEY: air pollution. emission controls. Oat wood paneling. 

~ 

Date ofEnactment or Last Substantive Amendment: 2012 

Authorizing. and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-1040) 

w 

Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

R307-350 

cellaneous Metal Parts a 

Products Coatings 

CE OF PROPOSED R'E 

(New Rule) I 

D FILE NO.: 36~£2 

Fl~ D: 09/06/12 

RUL NA SIS 

PURPOSE OF THE RUL: R REASON FOR THE 

CHANGE: In 2006, EPA t tened the 24-hour PM2.5 

national ambient air quar tandard from 65 to 35 

micrograms per cubic mete . Curr tly, seven Utah counties 

have been found by A to n meet this standard. 

Miscellaneous metal p s and produ s coating operations 

emit volatile organ· compounds OCs), which are 

precursors to the fo ation of PM2.5. This u!e for the PM2.5 

State !mplementa . n Plan will lower VOCs hat are emitted 

from fabric and iny! coating operations, as !! as clarify 

regulatory req · ements to the industry. 

applies 

to misce! neous metal parts coating operations, i uding 

related eaning activities, that have the potential to e · 2.7 

tons volatile organic compounds (VOC) per year and at 

cated in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooe 

76 

DAR File No. 36731 

Uta~. and Weber counties. The rule establishes reasona y 

va1!ab!e control technology requirements to reduce V C 

issions. Owners and operators have the option to re uce 

Cs by applying coatings with the VOC limits estab!is d in 

th rule or to use add-on controls to achieve at least 90% 

VO reduction. During the public comment period, he Air 

Qua y Board is requesting public input n the 

appro riateness of applying this rule in Tooele and ox Elder 

counti . 

STATUT RY OR CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHOR! 

THIS RU~ : Subsection 19-2-104(1)(a) 

ANTICIPAT D COST OR SAVINGS TO: 

+THE STAT BUDGET: The majority of the equirements in 

this rule were !ready found in the Utah Air uality rule, Rule 

R307-340, ·ch has been proposed o be repealed. 

Therefore, ther are no anticipated cost or savings to the 

state budget. ( AR NOTE: The prop ed repeal of Rule 

R307-340 is und DAR No. 36725 is t 1s issue, October 1, 

2012, of the Bulleti . ) 

+ LOCAL GOVERN ENTS: The majo ty of the requirements 

in this rule were air dy found in th Utah Air Quality rule, 

Rule R307-340, whic has been p posed to be repealed. 

Therefore, there are n anticipated costs or savings to local 

government. 

• SMALL BUSINESSE · 

between $238 to $6,560 r ton OC removed. These costs 

are highly dependent on th ind stria! application. 

+ PERSONS OTHER H N SMALL BUSINESSES, 

BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: 

This rule applies to mis neous metal part coatings 

operations that emit 2. 7 ton o VOC per year. There are no 

anticipated costs or savi s t persons other than small 

businesses, businesses, local ovemment entities. 

COMMENTS B THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE 

FISCAL IMPAC THE RULE MAY HAVE BUSINESSES: 

The fiscal impa this rule has on business d pends on which 

industry the e is being applied to. Estima d costs range 

from $238 t $6,560 per ton VOC remove . This fiscal 

impact is hi ly dependent on the industrial app ·cation. 

THE FUL TEXT OF THIS RULE MAY BE I 

DURING EGULAR BUSINESS HOURS, AT: 

NVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

AIR QUALITY 

FOURTH FLOOR 

195 N 1950 W 

SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-3085 

or at the Division of Administrative Rules. 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, October OJ, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 
NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES 

Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

R307-352 

etal Container, Closure, and Coil 

Coatings 

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE 

(New Rule) 

DAR FILE NO.: 36734 

FILED: 09/06/2012 

RULE ANALYSIS 

PURPOSE 0 THE RULE OR REASON FOR THE 

CHANGE: In 006, EPA tightened the 2 -hour PM2.5 

national ambien air quality standard fr 65 to 35 

micrograms per c ic meter. Currently, sev Utah counties 

have been found b EPA to not meet this s ndard. Coating 

operations in the nufacturing or reco itioning of metal 

cans, drums, pails, a d lids emit volatile rganic compounds 

(VOCs), which are pre ursors to the fo tion of PM2.5. This 

rule for the PM2.5 Stat Implementation Ian will lower VOCs 

that are emitted from fro these coatin operations. 

GE: This rule applies 

to coating operations in th manuf cturing or reconditioning 

of metal cans, drums, pails, nd Ii that have the potential to 

emit 2.7 tons of volatile orga ic ompounds (VOC) per year 

and that are located in Box d r, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, 

Tooele, Utah, and Weber co ties. The rule establishes 

reasonably available control chnology requirements to 

reduce voe emissions. 0 e and operators have the 

option to reduce voes by pply1 g coatings with the voe 

limits established in the e or t use add-on controls to 

achieve at least a 90% C redu ion. During the public 

comment period, the Air Quality Bo rd is requesting public 

input on the appropriat ess of appl ·ng this rule in Tooele 

and Box Elder counties 

STATUTORY OR CO STITUTIONAL AU 

THIS RULE: Subse ion 19-2-104(1 )(a) 

TOR SAVINGS TO: 

GET: This rule may add t 

Air Quality's ad mistrative costs; however, th e costs will be 

minimal. Ther ore, there are no anticipated c ts or savings 

to the state b get. 

+ LOCAL G ERNMENTS: This rule does no create any 

new require ents for local government; therefor there are 

no anticipa d costs or savings to local government 

+ SMAL BUSINESSES: Anticipated cost to s urces is 

$3,221 p r ton voe removed. 

+ PE ONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSIN SSES, 

BUSIN SSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL EN TIES: 

This le applies to coating operations in the manufactur g or 

reco ditioning of metal cans, drums, pails, and lids that ave 

the otential to emit 2.7 tons of volatile organic compou ds 

(V C) per year. There are no anticipated costs or savings to 

DAR File No. 36734 

rsons other than small businesses, businesses, or I 

ernment entities. 

LIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSON . The 

compl nee cost to implement the requirements oft s rule is 

approxi ately $3,221 per ton voe removed. 

COMMEN S BY THE DEPARTMENT HEA 

FISCAL IM CT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON SINESSES: 

The cost to b siness to comply with this rule i approximately 

$3,221 per ton N'OC removed. 

THE FULL TEX OF THIS RULE MAY.I BE INSPECTED, 

DURING REGULJ\ BUSINESS HOUR , AT: 

ENVIRON ENTAL QUALITY 

AIR QUALi 

FOURTH FL 

195 N 1950 W 

SALT LAKE Cl 

INTERESTED P SONS MAY A END A PUBLIC 

HEARING REGA DING THIS RULE: 

+ 10/15/2012 :00 AM, Bridgerland Ap lied Technology 

College, 1301 600 W, Rooms 171 D and , Logan, UT 

+ 10/16/201 11 :00 AM, Mountainland ssociation of 

Governmen , 586 E 800 N, Orem, UT 

• 10/17/20 2 02:00 PM, Utah Department of E ironmental 

Quality, 1 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT 

+ 10/17/ 012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Envi nmental 

Quality 195N1950W, Room No.1015, SLC, UT 

A THORIZED BY: Bryce Bird, Director 

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 

R307-352. Metal Container, Closure. and Coil Coatings. 

R307-352-l. Purpose. 

The DUfl!OSe of this rule is to reduce volatile organic 

compound CYOC) emissions from the coating of metal coils cans. 

drums pails. and lids. 

R307-352-2. Applicability. 

R307-352 applies to all coating operations. includin& 

related cleanin& activities in the manufacturin& or reconditionjng of 

metal cans. d.rums pails. and lids that haye the potential to emit 2.7 

tons a year ofVOC and that are located in Box Elder. Cache. Davis. 

Salt Lake. Tooele Utah and Weber counties 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, October OJ, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 
DAR File No. 36734 

R307-352-3. Definitions. 

The following additional definitions apply to R307-352: 

"Coil coating" means any coating applied to metal sheets 

or strips which are then rolled into coils for further industrial or 

commercial use. 

"End sealing compound" means a compound which is 

coated onto can ends and which functions as a gasket when the end 

is assembled onto the can. 

"Exterior body spray" means a coating sprayed on the 

exterior of the container body to provide a decorative or protective 

finish. 

"Interior body spray" means a coating sprayed on the 

interior of the can body to provide a protective film between the 

product and the can. 

"Metal container or closure coating" means any coating 

applied to either the interior or exterior of fooned metal cans. 

drums. pails. lids or crowns or flat metal sheets which are intended. 

to be formed into cans. drums pails. lids or crowns. 

"Overvarnish" means a coating applied directly over a 

design coating to reduce the coefficient of friction. to provide gloss 

and to protect the finish against abrasion and corrosion. 

"Reconditioned drums. pails or lids" means any metal 

container which is reused. recycled or remanufactured. 

"Three-piece can side-seam coating" means a coating 

sprayed on the exterior and/or interior of a welded cemented or 

soldered seam to protect the exposed metal. 

"Two-piece can exterior-end coating" means a coating 

applied to the exterior bottom end of a can to reduce the coefficient 

of friction and to provide protection to the metal. 

R307-3~2-4. Emission Standards. 

Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with a 

VOC content in excess of the amounts specified in Table I or shall. 

use an add-on control device as specified in R307-352-6. 

METAL CONTAINER AND CLOSURE COIL COATING LIMITATIONS 

(values in pounds voe per gallon of coating, minus water. as applied) 

COATING CATEGORY 

Sheet basecoat {interior and exterior) 

and overvarni sh 

Two-piece can exterior basecoat, 

overvarnish. and end coating 

Interior body spray 

Two-piece cans 

Three-piece cans 

Three-piece can side seam spray 

End sea 1 i ng compound: Food cans, non-food 

cans, and beverage cans 

Exterior body spray 

voe EMISSION RATES 

1. 9 

2.1 

3 .5 

3.0 

5. 5 

0.1 

3. 5 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, October 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 

NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES 

DRUMS, PAILS AND LIDS 

Body spray 

Reconditioned interior 

Reconditioned exterior 

New interior 

New exterior 

End sealing compound: Food drums and 

non-food drums 

Inks, all applications 

illl 

Cai 1 coating 

4 .2 

3 .5 

3. 5 

2.8 

0.5 

2. 5 

1.7 

R307-352-5. Work Practices and Recordkeeping. 

(}) The owner or operator shall: 

Cal Store all VOC-containing coatings. thinners. and 

cleaning materials in closed containers; 

(b) Minimize spills ofVOC-containing coatings thinners. 

and cleaning materials: 

(c) Clean up spills immediately: 

fdl Convey any coatings. thinners and cleaning materials 

in closed containers or pipes· 

Ce) Close mixing vessels that contain VOC coatings and 

other materials except when specifically in use: and 

<0 Minimize usage of solvents during cleaning of 

storage. mixing. and conveying equipment. 

(2) The owner or operator shall maintain records from the 

manufacturer that demonstrates compliance with the emission 

standards of R307-348-4. 

R307-352-6. Optional Add-On Controls. 

(I) The owner or operator may install and maintain an 

incinerator. carbon adsorption. or any other add-on emission control 

device. provided that the emission control device will attain at least 

90% efficiency performance 

(2) The owner or operator of a control device shall_ 

provide certification from the manufacturer that the emission 

control system will attain required efficiency performance. 

(3) Emission control systems shall be operated and 

maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. 

The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum of two years 

records of operating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that 

the equipment is being qperated and maintained in accqrdance with 

the manufacturer recommendations. 

R307-352-7. Compliance Schedule. 

All sources within Box Elder. Cache. Davis. Salt Lake. 

Tooele. Utah and Weber counties shall be in compliance with this 

rule by January I. 2014. 

KEY: air pollution. emission controls. metal containers. coil 

~ 

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: 2012 

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-1040) 

.(a) 

85 
DAR File No. 36736 

+ MALL BUSINESSES: Anticipated cost to sources is 

app oximately $2, 7 40 per ton voe removed. 

+ RSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSE , 

BUSI ESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITI 

This ru applies to automotive refinishing coatings opera · ns 

that emi 2.7 tons of VOC per year. There are no antici ated 

costs or avings to persons other than small busi 

businesse or local government entities. 

COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERS 

t to implement the requirements o 

,740 per ton voe removed. 

THE DEPARTMENT H 

E RULE MAY HAVE 0 

to comply with this rul is approximately 

moved. 

INTERESTED RSONS MAY ATIE A PUBLIC 

HEARING REG RDING THIS RULE: 

+ 10/15/2012 1:00 AM, Bridgerland Appl d Technology 

College, 1301 600 W, Rooms 171 D and E, gan, UT 

+ 10/16/20 2 11 :00 AM, Mountainland A ociation of 

Governme s, 586 E 800 N, Orem, UT 

+ 10/17/2 12 02:00 PM, Utah Department of En ·ronmental 

Quality, 5 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT 

• 10/1 2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Envir 

Quali , 195 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT 

RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 

THORIZED BY: Bryce Bird, Director 

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 

R307-354. Automotive Refinishing Coatings. 

R307-354-1. Purpose. 

The purpose of R307-354 is to limit volatile on~anic 

compound emissions fVOCl from automotive refinishing sources. 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, October 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 

NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES 

R307-354-2. Applicability 

R307-354 applies to automotive refinishing sources. 

including related cleaning operations. that have the potential to emit 

2.7 tons per year of VOC and are located in Box Elder. Cache._ 

Davis. Salt Lake. Tooele. Utah and Weber counties. 

R307-354-3. Definitions. 

The following additional definitions apply to R307-354: 

"Adhesion promoter" means a coating which is labeled 

and formulated to be applied to uncoated plastic surfaces to 

facilitate bonding of subsequent coatings. and on which. a 

subsequent coating is applied. 

"Automotive" means passenger cars. vans. motorcycles. 

trucks. buses. golf carts and all other mobile equipment. 

"Automotive refinishing" means the process of coating 

automobiles. after-market automobiles. motorcycles light and 

medium-duty trucks and vans that are performed in auto body shop. 

auto repair shops production paint shops. new car dealer repair and 

paint shops. fleet operation repair and paint shops. and any other 

facility which coats vehicles under the Standard Industrial 

Classification Code 7532 £Top. Body and Upholstery Repair Shops 

and Paint Shops). This includes dealer repair of vehicles damaged 

in transit. It does not include refinishing operations for other types 

of mobile equipment such as fanu machinery and construction 

equipment or their parts. including partial body collision repairs. 

that is subsequent to the original coating applied at an automobile 

original equipment manufacturing plant. 

"Clear coating" means any coating that contains no 

pigments and is labeled and formulated for application over a color 

coating or clear coating. 

"Coating" means a protective decorative. or functional 

material applied in a thin layer to a surface, Such materials may 

include paints. topcoats. varnishes. sealers stains washcoats. 

basecoa(S. inks. and temporary protective coatings 

"Color coating" means any pigmented coating. excluding 

adhesion promoters. primers. and multi-color coatings that requires 

a subsequent clear coating and which is applied over a primer. 

adhesion promoter or color coating. Color coatings include metallic 

and iridescent color coatings. 

"Cut-in or jambing clearcoat" means a fast-drying. 

ready-to-spray clearcoat applied to surfaces such as door jambs and . 

trunk and hood edges to allow for quick closure, 

"Elastomeric coating" means a coating designed for 

application over flexible parts such as elastomeric bumpers. 

"Enclosed paint gun cleaner" means a cleaner consisting 

of a closed container with a door or tqp that can be opened and 

closed and fitted with cleaning connectiqns The spray gun is 

attached to a connection. and solvent is pumped through the gun 

and onto the exterior qf the gun. Cleaning solvent falls back into 

the cleaner's sqlvent reservoir for recirculation, 

"Finishing material" means a coating used in .the 

automotive refinishing industry. including basecoats stains. 

washcoats. sealers. and topcqa(S, 

"Finishing operation" means thqse activities in which a 

finishing material is applied to a substrate and is subsequently airdried cured in an oven. or cured by radiatiqn, 

89 
NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES 

"Low-gloss coating" means a coating which exhibits a 

gloss reading less than or eq_μa! to 25 on a 60 degree glossmeter. 

"Metallic/Iridescent color coating" means a coating which 

contains iridescent particles. composed of either metal as metallic 

particles or silicon as mica particles. in excess of 0 042 pounds per 

gallon as a,pplied where such particles are visible in the dried film. 

"Multi-colored coating" means a coa,ting which exhibits 

more than one color when applied. and which is packa,gcd in a, 

single conta,iner and applied in a, single coat. 

''Non - enclosed paint gun cleaner" means cleaner 

consisting of a, basin similar to a sink in which the operator washes 

the outside of the gun under a solvent strea,m. The gun cup is filled 

with recircula,ted solvent. the gun tip is placed into a canister 

a,ttached to the basin and suction draws the solvent from the cup 

through the gun. The solvent grayita,tes to the bottom of the basin 

and drains through a, small hole to a, reservoir tha,t supplies solvent 

to the recirculation pump. 

"Pretreatment coating" mea,ns a coating which conta,ins no 

more that 16% solicls. by weight. and a,t least 0 5% acid by weight 

is used to provide surface etching and is applied directly to bare 

meta,1 surfaces to provide corrosion resistance and promote adhesion 

for subsequent coatings. 

"Primer" means anY coa,ting which is la,beled and 

formulated for a.oplication to a substrate to provide a bond between 

the substrate and subsequent coa.ts: corrosion resistance· a smooth 

substrate surface: or resistance to penetration of subsequent coats. 

and on which a subsequent coating is a,pplied. Primers may be 

pigmented, 

"Single-sta,ge coa,ting" means any pigmented coating 

excluding primers and multi-color coatings la,beled and fonuulated 

for applica,tion without a, subsequent clear coa,t. Single-stage 

coa,tings include single-sta,ge meta.Ilic/iridescent coa,tings. 

"Solids" means the Part of the coating tha,t rema,ins a,fter 

the coa,ting is dried or cured· solids content is determined using da,ta, 

from EPA Method 24 

"Specia,Ity coa,tings" means a,dhesion promoters. low-gloss 

coa,tings bright meta,1 trim repa,ir coa,tings, jambing (cut-in) 

clearcoa,ts. ela,stomeric coa,tings impact resistant coatings. 

underbody coa,tings. uniform finish blenders and weld-through 

"Temporary protective coating" means a,ny coa,ting which 

is la,beled and formulated for the pur:pose of tempora,rily protecting 

areas form oyerspray or mechanical damage, 

"Topcoat" means any coating or series of coatings applied 

over a primer or an existing finish for the pw:pose of protection or 

beautification. 

"Truck bed liner coating" means anY coating. excluding 

clear color multi-color. and single-stage coatings. labeled and 

formulated for aoolication to a truck bed to protect it from surface 

abrasion. 

"Underbody coating" means any coating labeled and 

formulated for application to wheel wells. the inside of door panels 

or fenders. the underside of a trunk or hood or the underside of the 

motor vehicle 

"Uniform finish coating" means anY coating la,beled and 

formulated for application to the area around a, spot repair for the 

pur:pose of blending a repaired area's color or clear coat to match the 

appearance of an adjacent area,'s existing coating. Prior to May I. 

90 

DAR File No. 36736 

2013 this coa,ting category may be referred to as uniform finish 

blenders. 

"Uniform finish blender" means a coating designed to 

blend a repaired topcoat into an existing topcoat 

8307-354-4. Emission Standards. 

Each owner or operator sha,ll not apply coatings with a 

VOC content in excess of the amounts 5P1!Cified jn Table 1 or shall 

use an add-on control device as specified in R307-354-6 

AUTOMOTIVE REFINISHING voe LIMITS 

(values in pounds of voe per gallon of coating. minus water. 

as applied) 

COATING CATEGORY voe EMISSION RATES 

Adhesion Promoter 4.5 

Cl ear Coating 2. 1 

Color Coating 3.5 

Multi-color Coating 5. 7 

Pretreatment Coating 5. 5 

Primer 2.1 

Primer Sealer 2 .1 

Single-stage Coating 2.8 

Temoorary Protective Coating 0.5 

Truck Bed Liner Coating 2.6 

Underbody Coating 3 .6 

Uniform Finish Coating 

Any Other Coating Type 2.1 

8307-354-5, Work Practice and Recordkeepjng, 

(I) Control techniques and work practices are to be 

implemented at all times to reduce voe emissions from fugitive 

type sources. Control techniques and work practices include: 

fa) Tight fitting covers for open tanks: 

<b) Covered conta,iners for solyent wiping cloths: 

(cl Collection hoods for areas where solvent is used for 

fd) Minimizing spill of VOC-containing cleaning 

ma,terials: 

<e) Conveying VOC-containing materials from one 

location to another in closed containers or pipes: 

<O Cleaning spray guns in enclosed systems or 

a non-enclosed paint gun clea,ner may be used if the vapor pressure 

of the cleaning solvent is less than 100 mm Hg at 68 degrees 

Fahrenheit and the solvent is directed towards a drain that leads 

directly to an enclosed remote reservoir: and 

(g) Using recycled solvents for cleaning, 

(2) The owner or operator shall maintain records from the 

manufacturer that demonstrate compliance with the emission 

standards ofR307-354-4, 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, October 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 
DAR File No. 36736 

(3) Application equipmentrequirements: 

(a) A person shall not wply any coating to an automotive 

part or component unless the coating application method achieves a 

demonstrated 65% transfer efficiency, 

(b) The following coating application methods have been 

demonstrated to achieve a minimum of 65% transfer efficiency: 

(i) Brush dip or roll coating operated in accordance with 

the manufacturers specifications: 

(ii) Electrostatic wplication equipment operated in 

accordance with the manufacturers specifications: and 

(iii) High Volume. Low Pressure spray equipment 

operated in accordance with the manufacturers specifications. 

(c) Other coating wplication methods may be used that 

have been demonstrated to be capable of achieving at least 65% 

transfer efficiency. as certified by the manufacturer. 

R307-354-6. Optional Add-On Controls. 

(I) The owner or operator may install and maintain an 

incinerator. carbon adsorption or any other add-on emission control 

device. provided that the emission control device will attain at least 

90% efficiency performance. 

(2) The owner or operator of a control device shall_ 

provide certification from the manufacturer that the emission 

control system will attain required efficiency performance. 

(3) Emission control systems shall be operated and 

· maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. 

The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum of two years 

records of operating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that 

the equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with 

the manufacturer recommendations. 

R307-354-7. Compliance Schedule. 

All sources within Box Elder. Cache. Davis. Salt Lake. 

Tooele. Utah. and Weber counties shall be in compliance with this 

rule by January I. 2014. 

KEY: ajr pollution. automotive refinishing. VOC. coatings 

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: 2012 

Authorizing. and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(1) 

w 

vironmental Quality, Air Quali 

R307-355 

RULE ANALYSIS 

THE RULE OR REASON OR THE 

2006, EPA tightened the 24-ho 

ambient air quality standard from 65 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, October 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 

NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES 

micrograms per cubic meter. Currently, seven Utah counti s 

have been found by EPA to not meet this standard. Coati gs 

perations, organic solvent cleansing, and storage nd 

· posal of solvents at aerospace manufacture and r ork 

fa ilities emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs), whi h are 

pre ursors to the formation of PM2.5. This rule for the M2.5 

Stat Implementation Plan will lower VOCs that are emitted 

from ese operations. 

This r, le applies 

to aeros ace manufacture and rework facilities t at have the 

potential o emit five tons of volatile organi compounds 

(VOC) pe year and that are located in Box Ider, Cache, 

Davis, Salt ake, Tooele, Utah, and Weber co ties. The rule 

establishes reasonably available cont I technology 

requirements to reduce VOC emissions Owners and 

operators ha the option to reduce V Cs by applying 

coatings with t voe limits established i the rule or to use 

add-on controls 0 achieve at least a 9 % voe reduction. 

Coating applicati methods and work ractices for cleaning 

materials are es blished. Owner and operators are 

required to maint · records from e manufacturer that 

demonstrate compli ce with the e 1ssion standards in the 

rule. Hand-wipe, flus , and spray g n cleaning requirements 

are included in the rul . During t public comment period, 

the Air Quality Board is reque ting public input on the 

appropriateness of apply g this le in Tooele and Box Elder 

counties and is asking in stry t provide information on their 

cost to comply with the rule 

ANTICIPATED COST OR AVI S TO: 

• THE STATE BUDGET: Ther may some an increase in 

administrative costs at e Divisi of Air Quality; however, 

costs should be minim . Therefor , there are no anticipated 

costs or savings to the tate budget. 

+ LOCAL GOVERN ENTS: This le does not add any 

requirements to lo I government; t refore, there are no 

anticipated costs or avings. 

+ SMALL BUSINE SES: The division 

to small busines es to implement this le. However, the 

division is unsur of what those costs wo d be. That is why 

during the pub c comment period, the Ai Quality Board is 

asking that ind stry provide cost information. 

+ PERSON OTHER THAN SMALL 

BUSINESS , OR LOCAL GOVERNMEN 

This rule pplies to aerospace manufacture and rework 

facilities t t have the potential to emit five to of volatile 

organic c mpounds (VOC) per year. There are n anticipated 

costs o~ savings to persons other than small b sinesses, 

busine es, or local government entities. 

divi · n does anticipate compliance costs for a ected 

per ons. However, the division is unsure of what those osts 

w Id be. That is why during the public comment period, the 
UTAH STATE 

BULLETIN 

OFFICIAL NOTICES OF UTAH STATE GOVERNMENT 

Filed December 0 I, 2012, 12:00 a.m. through December 14, 2012, 11 :59 p.m. 

Number 2013-1 

January 01, 2013 

Nancy L. Lancaster, Editor 

Kenneth A. Hansen, Director 

Kimberly K. Hood, Executive Director 

The Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin) is an official noticing publication of the executive branch of 

Utah State Government. The Department of Administrative Services, Division of Administrative Rules 

produces the Bulletin under authority of Section 63G-3-402. 

Inquiries concerning the substance or applicability of an administrative rule that appears in the 

Bulletin should be addressed to the contact person for the rule. Questions about the Bulletin or the 

rulemaking process may be addressed to: Division of Administrative Rules, PO Box 141007, Salt Lake 

City, Utah 84114-1007, telephone 801-538-3764, FAX 801-537-9240. Additional rulemaking 

information, and electronic versions of all administrative rule publications are available at: 

http://www.rules.utah.gov/ 

The information in this Bulletin is summarized in the Utah State Digest (Digest). The Digest is 

available by E-mail or over the Internet. Visit http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/digest.htm for 

additional information. 
Division of Administrative Rules, Salt Lake City 84114 

Unless otherwise noted, all information presented in this publication is in the 

public domain and may be reproduced, reprinted, and r<.!distributed as desired. 

Materials incorporated by reference retain the copyright asserted by their respective authors. 

Citation to the source is requested. 

Utah state bulletin. 

Semimonthly. 

I. Delegated legislation--Utah--Periodicals. 2. Administrative procedure-Utah-Periodicals. 

I. Utah. Office of Administrative Rules. 

KFU440.A 73S7 

348. 792'025--DDC 85-643197 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES ................................................................................................................................................. 1 

Human Services 

Services for People with Disabilities 

No. 37110 (Amendment): R539-1 Eligibility .......................................................................................................... - ... 2 

No. 37111 (Amendment): R539-2 Service Coordination ............................................................................................ 8 

Natural Resources 

Wildlife Resources 

No. 37097 (Amendment): R657-37 Cooperative Wildlife Management Units 

for Big Game or Turkey .......................................................................................................................................... 11 

Regents (Board Of) 

University of Utah, Commuter Services 

No. 37096 (Amendment): R810-1-8 University Vehicle Parking .............................................................................. 12 

No. 37098 (Amendment): R810-1-14 Living In A Motor Vehicle On Campus .......................................................... 13 

No. 37092 (Amendment): R810-2-1 Parking Meters ................................................................................................ 14 

Tax Commission 

Administration 

No. 37104 (Amendment): R861-1A-26 Procedures for Formal Adjudicative 

Proceedings Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Sections 59-1-501 and 63G-4-204 

through 63G-4-209 ................................................................................................................................................. 15 

No. 37106 (Amendment): R861-1A-37 Provisions Relating to Disclosure of 

Commercial Information Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Section 59-1-404 ............................................................... 17 

No. 37107 (Amendment): R861-1A-46 Procedures for Purchaser Refund 

Requests Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Sections 59-1-1410 and 59-12-110 .......................................................... 18 

Auditing 

No. 37108 (Amendment): R865-91-13 Pass-Through Entity Withholding Pursuant 

to Utah Code Ann. Sections 59-10-116, 59-10-117, 59-10-118, 59-10-1403.2, 

and 59-1 0-1405 ...................................................................................................................................................... 20 

Property Tax 

No. 37109 (Amendment): R884-24P-67 Information Required for Valuation of 

Low-Income Housing Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Sections 59-2-102 and 

59-2-301.3 .............................................................................................................................................................. 22 

Transportation 

Administration 

No. 37094 (Repeal and Reenact): R907-64 Longitudinal and Wireless Access to 

Interstate Highway Rights-of-Way for Installation of Telecommunications Facilities .............................................. 23 

NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES ........................................................................................................................ 31 

Environmental Quality 

Administration 

No. 36554: R305-6 Administrative Procedures ........................................................................................................ 32 

No. 36553: R305-7 Administrative Procedures ........................................................................................................ 32 

Air Quality 

No. 36723: R307-101-2 Definitions .......................................................................................................................... 38 

No. 367 41: R307-307 Davis, Salt Lake, and Utah Counties: Road Salting and Sanding ...................................... .45 

No. 36740: R307-312 Aggregate Processing Operations for PM2.5 NonattainmentAreas .................................... .47 

No. 36725: R307-340 Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas: Surface Coating 

Processes ............................................................................................................................................................... 48 

No. 36738: R307-343 Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas: Emissions Standards 

for Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations ....................................................................................................... 49 

No. 36726: R307-344 Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings .............................................................................................. 52 

No. 36727: R307-345 Fabric and Vinyl Coatings ..................................................................................................... 54 

No. 36728: R307-346 Metal Furniture Surface Coatings ......................................................................................... 57 

No. 36729: R307-347 Large Appliance Surface Coatings ....................................................................................... 59 

No. 36730: R307-348 Magnet Wire Coatings .......................................................................................................... 61 

No. 36731: R307-349 Flat Wood Panel Coatings .................................................................................................... 63 

No. 36732: R307-350 Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Coatings .............................................................. 65 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. I 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

No. 36733: R307-351 GraphicArts .......................................................................................................................... 69 

No. 36734: R307-352 Metal Container, Closure, and Coil Coatings ........................................................................ 73 

No. 36735: R307-353 Plastic Parts Coatings ........................................................................................................... 75 

No. 36736: R307-354 Automotive Refinishing Coatings .......................................................................................... 79 

No. 36737: R307-355 Control of Emissions from Aerospace Manufacture and 

Rework Facilities .................................................................................................................................................... 82 

FIVE-YEAR NOTICES OF REVIEW AND STATEMENTS OF CONTINUATION ........................................................................... 87 

Administrative Services 

Administration 

No. 37089: R 13-3 Americans with Disabilities Act Grievance Procedures ............................................................... 87 

Environmental Quality 

Radiation Control 

No. 37086: R313-15 Standards for Protection Against Radiation ............................................................................ 87 

Financial Institutions 

Credit Unions 

No. 37105: R337-4 Establishment of "Credit Union Service Organizations" ........................................................... 88 

Health 

Disease Control and Prevention, Epidemiology 

No. 37093: R386-705 Epidemiology; Health Care Associated Infection .................................................................. 89 

Center for Health Data, Vital Records and Statistics 

No. 37087: R436-6 Delayed Registration of Birth or Death ..................................................................................... 89 

Insurance 

Administration 

No. 37099: R590-124 Loss Information Rule ........................................................................................................... 90 

No. 37100: R590-155 Utah Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Association 

Summary Document. .............................................................................................................................................. 90 

No. 37101: R590-215 Permissible Arbitration Provisions for Individual and Group 

Health Insurance .................................................................................................................................................... 91 

Natural Resources 

Wildlife Resources 

No. 37090: R657-23 Utah Hunter Education Program ............................................................................................. 92 

No. 37091: R657-33 Taking Bear ............................................................................................................................. 92 

Public Service Commission 

Administration 

No. 37095: R746-343 Rule for Deaf, Severely Hearing or Speech Impaired Person .............................................. 93 

No. 37102: R746-356 Intrastate (lntraLATA) Equal Access to Toll Calling Services 

by Telecommunications Carriers ............................................................................................................................ 93 

School and Institutional Trust Lands 

Administration 

No. 37088: R850-70 Sales of Forest Products From Trust Lands Administration Lands ......................................... 94 

NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES ..................................................................................................................................... 95 

2012 RULES INDEX 

BY AGENCY (CODE NUMBER) 

AND 

BY KEYWORD (SUBJECT) ........................................................................................................................................................... 97 

ii UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013. No. l 
DAR File No. 36740 

Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

R307-312 

regate Processing Operations f 

PM2.5 Nonattainment Areas 

NO ICE OF CHANGE IN PROPOSED RU 

DAR FILE NO.: 36740 

FILED: 12/10/2012 

RULE ANALYSIS 

PURPOSE THE RULE OR REASON 

CHANGE: Du ·ng the public comment peri , comments 

from both indust and the EPA were submitte that resulted 

in the need to ma e substantive changes to t rule. 

SUMMARY OF T RULE OR CHANGE Section R307-

312-2 is changed b incorporating the P .5 nonattainment 

and maintenance are as defined in 40 FR 81.345 and by 

adding a geographical escription of the rea. A definition for 

"Aggregate" is added t Section R307- 121-3. Language is 

added to the opacity ob ervation req rement of Subsection 

R307-312-4(2) that states he Method observations shall be 

30 minutes (five six-minut average . The compliance shall 

be based on the average o the fiv six-minute averages, but 

the duration of the Method ma be reduced to 6 minutes 

(one six-minute average) if e 1rst six-minute average is 

below the limit specified in 1 1 of Section R307-312-4. 

Section R307-312-5 is chang d by adding language that 

states compliance with the req i ments of Subsection R307-

312-5(2) shall be determined y reduction records and fuel 

records. (DAR NOTE: Th' cha ge in proposed rule has 

been filed to make addition chang s to a proposed new rule 

that was published in the ctober 1, 012, issue of the Utah 

State Bulletin, on page 5. Underl1 ing in the rule below 

indicates text that has b n added sin the publication of the 

proposed rule mention above; strike- ut indicates text that 

has been deleted. Yi must view the hange in proposed 

rule and the propose new rule together understand all of 

the changes that wil e enforceable shoul the agency make 

this rule effective.) 

STATUTORY OR ONSTITUTIONAL AUTHO IZATION FOR 

THIS RULE: ction 19-2-101 and Section 19-2-104 and 

Section 19-2-1 

MATERIALS CORPORATED BY REFERENCE 

•A ds 40 CFR 81.345, published by Unit 

G ernment Printing Office, 07/01/2011 

ANTICIP ED COST OR SAVINGS TO: 

• THE ATE BUDGET: The changes to Subsection 

312-4( may result in a cost or a savings to the Divis 

Air Qu lity; however, it is difficult to estimate what those sts 

or sa ings would be. Any additional cost or saving woul be 

mini al; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savin s 

to t e state budget. 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. I 

NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES 

LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There are no new requirem ts 

local government; therefore, there are no anticipated sts 

vings. 

• S LL BUSINESSES: There are no new require 

small usinesses; therefore, there are no anticipated 

saving 

+ PER ONS OTHER THAN 

BUSINES ES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTA 

There are new requirements to persons ot r than small 

businesses, businesses, or local gover ent entities; 

therefore, ther are no anticipated costs ors ings. 

COMMENTS BY THE EPA TMENT HEAD ON THE 

FISCAL IMPACT THE RUL Y HAVE ON BUSINESSES: 

The only new requirement fo usinesses is the requirement 

for hot mix asphalt plants emonstrate compliance with 

Section R307-312-5 thro h eduction records and fuel 

records. This requiremen should ot h·ave a fiscal impact on 

businesses. 

THE FULL TEXT 0 THIS RULE AY BE INSPECTED, 

DURING REGULAR USINESS HOUR , AT: 

ENVIRON ENTAL QUALITY 

AIR au ITY. 

FOURT FLOOR 

195 N 950 W 

SAL LAKE CITY, UT 84116-3085 

the Division of Administrative Rule . 

DIRECT ESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE 

• Mark erger by phone at 801-536-4000, by F at 801-

536-00 5, or by Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov 

THORIZED BY: Bryce Bird, Director 

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 

R307-312. Aggregate Processing Operations for PM2.5 

Nonattainment Areas. 

R307-312-l. Purpose. 

R307-312 establishes emission standards for sources in the 

aggregate processing industry, including aggregate processing 

equipment, hot mix asphalt plants, and concrete batch plants. 

R307-312-2. Applicability. 

(I) R307-312 applies to all crushers, screens, conveyors, hot 

mix asphalt plants, and concrete batch plants located within a PM2.5 

nonattainment and maintenance area as defined in 40 CFR 81.345 

<July I. 20 I ll and geographically described as all regions of Salt Lake 

and Davis counties· all portions of the Cache Valley: all regions in 

47 
NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES 

Weber and Utah counties west of the Wasatch mountain range· in Box 

Elder County. from the Wasatch mountain range west to the 

Promontory mountain range and south of Portage· and in Tooele_ 

Count)' from the northernmost part of the Oquirrh mountain range to. 

the northern most part of the Stansbury mountain range and north o( 

Route 199. [Be:>< Elder, Caehe, Dt1Yis, Salt Lftlce, 'Feeele, Utah, er 

\l,Zeber eetlflties.] 

(2) The provisions of R307-3 I 2 do not apply to temporary 

hot mix asphalt plants. · 

R307-312-3. Definitions. 

The following definitions apply to R307-3 I 2: 

"Aggregate" means material of wbich the majorit)' is 

nonmetallic minerals 

"Concrete batch plant" means any facility used to 

manufacture concrete by mixing aggregate with cement. 

"Conveyor" means a device for transporting nonmetallic 

materials from one piece of equipment to another. 

"Cmsher" means a machine used to cmsh any nonmetallic 

minerals. 

"Hot mix asphalt plant" means any facility used to 

manufacture hot mix asphalt by heating and drying aggregate and 

mixing with asphalt cements. 

"Nonmetallic mineral" has the same definition as defined in 

40 CFR 60.671. 

"Screen" means a device for separating nonmetallic minerals 

according to size by passing undersize material through one or more 

mesh surfaces in series, and retaining oversize material on the mesh 

surfaces. 

"Temporary" means not more than 180 operating days and 

not more than 365 calendar days. 

R307-3 I 2-4. Visible Emissions. 

(I) Visible emissions from sources subject to R307-312 

shall not exceed the opacity limits as specified in Table I. 

CATEGORY 

Crushers 

Screens 

Conveyor transfer points 

Concrete batch plants 

TABLE 1 

(2) Opacity Observation. 

OPACITY LIMIT 

12% 

7% 

7% 

7% 

(a) Opacity observations of emissions shall be conducted 

according to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9. 

fb\ The duration of the Method 9 observations shall be 30 

minutes (five six-minute averages) 

(c) Compliance shall be based on !he average of !he five 

six-mjnute averages The duration of Metbod 9 may be reduced to 6 

minutes lone six-minute average) jf !he first six-minute average is 

below !he limit specified in Table I 

R307-312-5. Hot Mix Asphalt Plants. 

(I) The filterable PM2.5 emission rate from a hot mix 

asphalt plant dryer shall not exceed 0.024 grains per dscf. 

(a) Filterable PM2.5 emissions shall be determined by 40 

CFR 51, Appendix M. Method 201A. 

48 

DAR File No. 36740 

1 asis. _____ compliance shall be based on either the daily amount of 

hot mix asphalt produced averaged over the operating day or the daily 

amount of hot mix asphalt produced while burning a fuel other than 

natural gas or LPG averaged over the time the plant is operating while 

burning a fuel other than natural gas or LPG each day. 

(cl Compliance shall be detenuined by production records 

and fuel records 

R307-312-6. Compliance Schedule. 

(I) All sources subject to R307-312-4 or R307-312-5(2) 

shall be in compliance with this rule by June 7, 2013. 

(2) All sources subject to R307-312-5(1) that begin 

construction prior to June 7, 2013, shall submit test results 

demonstrating compliance with R307-312-5( I) to the director by 

December 14, 2015. 

(3) All sources subject to R307-312-5(1) that begin 

construction on or after June 7, 2013, shall submit test results 

demonstrating compliance with R307-3 l 2-5( I) to the director no later 

than 180 days after initial startup. 

KEY: air pollution, aggregate, asphalt, concrete 

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: [~)llll.J. 

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-101; 19-

2-104; 19-2-109 

Environmental Quality, Air Qualit~ 

R307-340 

zone Nonattainment an 

Mainte ance Areas: Surfac 

Processes 

ALYSIS 

PURPOSE OF OR REASON FOR THE 

CHANGE: On t Utah Air Quality Board 

approved the repeal f this rul but requested that the 

effective date of the peal be 02/01 013. That date comes 

three days after t proposed rule lap date of 01/29/2013. 

Therefore, in or r to not let the rule la e, and to have an 

effective repe date of 02/0112013, a CH nge In Proposed 

Rule is bein 1led. 

SUMM Y OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: 

chan s being made to the body of the rule. Utah Air 

Qu ty Board has requested that the repeal of th rule be 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. I 
DAR File No. 36726 

and to require them to make those records available to the 

director upon request. Subsection R307-344-5(3) i 

amended by adding application requirements. Section R30 -

344-6 is changed to clarify that the owner or operator m st 

provi documentation that the emission control system ·11 

attain t e requirements of Section R307-344-6. (DAR N TE: 

This cH nge in proposed rule has been filed to ake 

additiona changes to a proposed new rule that was pu ished 

in the 0 ber 1, 2012, issue of the Utah State Bull tin, on 

page 65. derlining in the rule below indicates text hat has 

been adde since the publication of the prop sed rule 

mentioned a ove; strike-out indicates text that as been 

deleted. You ust view the change in proposed le and the 

proposed new le together to understand all of he changes 

that will be en rceable should the agency ke this rule 

effective.) 

STATUTORY OR NSTITUTIONAL AUTH 

THIS RULE: Subse ion 19-2-104(1 )(a) 

e the rule's applicability to 

existing sources in Box Elder a Tooele counties is changed 

from sources with the potential emit 2. 7 tons per year voe 

to sources with the the potenti I t emit 5 tons per year VOC, 

the rule will apply to few r so rces in those counties, 

resulting in a savings of p to 1,440 per ton of voe 

removed. 

+ PERSONS OTHER THAN ALL BUSINESSES, 

BUSINESSES, OR LO AL GOVER MENTAL ENTITIES: 

Because there are no ew requireme s for persons other 

than small businesse , businesses, o local government 

entities, there are no ticipated costs or vings. 

COMPLIANCE C STS FOR AFFEC PERSONS: 

Because the rule' applicability to existing ources in Box 

Elder and Tooele aunties is changed from s urces with the 

potential to emit .7 tons per year voe to so rces with the 

the potential to mit 5 tons per year voe, the le will apply 

to fewer sourc s in those counties, resulting in savings of 

up to $1,440 r ton of voe removed. 

COMMENT BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD 

FISCAL I ACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSI 

Because he rule's applicability to existing sources ·n Box 

Elder an Tooele counties is changed from sources w h the 

potenti to emit 2.7 tons per year voe to sources wit the 

the po ntial to emit 5 tons per year voe, the rule will a ply 

to fe er sources in those counties, resulting in a saving of 

up t $1,440 per ton of voe removed. 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. I 

NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES 

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 

R307-344. Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings. 

R307-344-l. Purpose. 

The purpose of this rule is to limit volatile organic 

compound (VOC) emissions from roll, knife, and rotogravure coaters 

and drying ovens of paper, film, and foil coating operations. 

R307-344-2. Applicability. 

[R3G7 3 4 4 !IJll"lies ff! f'!IJleF, Hlftl; mu! fail eet!Eiftg 

eflerfttieHs, iHelttdiHg relHted eleMing Reth ities, thftt Hll • e !he f'!lteHtilll 

ff! emit 2. 7 teHS !"Cf ) ellf ef voe llHd !hilt llfe leellted it! Bell Elder, 

Clleke, Dll't is, Solt Llllre, Tueele, U!ftk Md V/eher eettHties. ](J) R307-

344 aP!llies to sources located in Cache Davis, Salt Lake Utah and. 

Weber counties that have the potential to emit 2 7 tons per year or. 

more ofVOC. including related cleaning activities 

(2) In Box Elder and Tooele counties, R307-344 applies to 

the following sources: 

(a) Existing sources as of February !. 2013. with the 

potential to emit 5 tons per year or more of voe including related. 

cleaning activities: and 

Cb) New sources as of February I 2013. that haye the 

potential to emit 2 7 tons per year or more ofYOC. including related 

cleaning activities. 

R307-344-3. Definitions. 

The following additional definitions apply to R307-344: 

"Coating" means a protective, functional, or decorative film 

applied in a thin layer to a surface. This term often applies to paints 

such as lacquers or enamels. It is also used to refer to films applied to 

paper, plastics, or foil. 

"Foil coating" means a coating applied in a web coating 

process on any foil substrate other than paper or fabric, including, but 

not limited to, typewriter ribbons, photographic film, magnetic tape, 

and metal foil gift wrap, but excluding coatings applied to packaging 

used exclusively for food and health care products for human and 

animal consumption. 

"Knife coating" means the application of a coating material 

to a substrate by means of drawing the substrate beneath a blade that 

spreads the coating evenly over the width of the substrate. 

53 
NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES 

"Paper coating" means unifonn distribution of coatings put 

on paper, film, foils and pressure sensitive tapes regardless of 

substrate. Related web coating processes on plastic film and 

decorative coatings on metal foil are included in this definition. Paper 

coating covers saturation operations as well as coating operations. 

"Roll coating" means the application of a coating material to 

a substrate by means of hard rubber or steel rolls. 

"Roll printing" means the application of words, designs and 

pictures to a substrate usually by means of a series of hard rubber or 

steel rolls each with only partial coverage. 

"Rotogravure coating" means the application of a unifonn 

layer of material across the entire width of the web to substrate by 

means of a roll coating technique in which the pattern to be applied is 

etched on the coating roll. The coating material is picked up in these 

recessed areas and is transferred to the substrate. 

"Saturation" means dipping the web into a bath. 

''Web" means a continuous sheet of substrate. 

R307-344-4. Emission Standards. 

Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with a VOC 

content in excess of the amounts specified in Table l or shall use an 

add-on control device as specified in R307-344-6. 

TABLE 1 

Paper, Film, and Foil Coating Limitations 

(values in pounds voe per pound of coating, minus water.J!!!! 

exempt solvents (compounds not classified as VOC), as applied) 

COATING CATEGORY voe EM!SS ION RATES 

Paper, film and foil 0.08 

Pressure sensitive tape 

and label 0.067 

R307-344-5. Work Practices and Record keeping. 

(l) Control techniques and work practices are to be 

implemented at all times to reduce voe emissions from fugitive type 

sources. Control techniques and work practices include: 

(a) Using tight fitting covers for open tanks; 

(b) Using covered containers for solvent wiping cloths; 

(c) Using collection hoods for areas where solvent is used 

for cleanup; 

(d) Minimizing spills of VOC-containing cleaning 

materials; 

(e) Conveying VOC-containing materials from one location 

to another in closed containers or pipes; 

(f) Cleaning spray guns in enclosed systems; and 

(g) Using recycled solvents for cleaning. 

(2) [The 6'Ml:ef 6f 6f'el'!tt6f shttll lfl11mt11ill: reeeras fffllfl the 

lflllll:ttf11eltifer tl111t EleH!eHslfllte eeH!plillflee with the emissiell: stanElllfEls 

efR3G7 344 4.)All sources subject to R307-344 shall maintain records 

demonstrating compliance with all provisions of R307-344 on an. 

annual basis. 

(a) Records shall include. but not limited to. inventory and 

product data sheets of all coatings and solvents subject to R307-344. 

fb) These records shall be available to the director uoon 

(3) No person shall apply coatings unless these materials are 

applied with equipment operated according to the manufacturer's 

specifications. and by the use of one of the following methods: 

54 

DAR File No. 36726 

(a) Flow coater: 

fb) Roll coater; 

(c) Dip coater; 

(d) Foam coater: 

(e) Die coater: 

<O Hand application methods: 

(g) High-volume. low pressure (HVLPl spray: or 

(h) Other application method capable of achieving at least 

65% transfer efficiency. as certified by the manufacturer. 

( 4) All persons shall perfoun solvent cleaning operations 

with cleaning materials having voe content of0.21 pounds per gallon 

~ 

R307-344-6. Optional Add-On Controls. 

( 1) The owner or operator may install and maintain an 

incinerator, carbon adsorption, or any other add-on emission control 

device, provided that the emission control device will attain at least 

90% efficiency perfonnance. 

(2) The owner or operator of a control device shall provide 

[ eertiiie11tiell: )documentation [ fre!fl the lflllHttfoetttrer )that the emission 

control system will attain [ feEjttireEI effieiell:e~· perffiflflllflee ]the 

requirements ofR307-344-6. 

(3) Emission control systems shall be operated and 

maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. 

The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum of two years 

records of operating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that the 

equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the 

manufacturer recommendations. 

R307-344-7. Compliance Schedule. 

(1) All sources in Davis and Salt Lake counties are subject 

to this rule upon the effective date. 

(2) Sources in Box Elder. Cache. Tooele, Utah and Weber 

counties shall be in compliance with the rule by January 1, 2014. 

KEY: VOC emission, paper coating, film coating, foil coating 

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: [WH]1!UJ 

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(1) 

(a) 

nvironmental Quality, Air Quali 

R307-345 

PURPOSE OF TH FOR THE 

CHANGE: During 

and existing sm sources expressed th · concerns about 

the 2.7 tons r year applicability being ap 

ox Elder and Tooele counties. 

regarding the 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. 1 
DAR File No. 36727 

re uirements. The changes to the proposed rule are 

res onse to these comments. 

ARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: Section R3 -

345-2 is changed stating that in Tooele and Box E er 

countie , as of 02/0112013, the rule applies to exi ing 

sources as of 02/01/2013, that have the potential to e it 5 

tons per ear or more of VOC and applies to new s urces 

that have e potential to emit 2.7 tons per year or mar voe. 

The rule s I applies in Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, U h, and 

Weber coun ·es to sources that have the potential t emit 2.7 

tons per yea or more VOC. Language is added o Section 

R307-345-4 to clarify that exempt solvents are no included in 

the VOC cont nt limits for the coating used. It is also 

changed by ad 'ng lower voe emission rates that become 

effective 01/01/2 15. Section R307-345-5 · changed to 

require owners and operators to m ntain records 

demonstrating co liance with the rule on n annual basis 

and to require them to make those record available to the 

director upon req st. Subsection 307-345-5(4) is 

amended by adding a lication requirem ts. Section R307-

345-6 is changed to c rify that the o er or operator must 

provide documentation at the emissi n control system will 

attain the requirements o Section R3 -345-6. (DAR NOTE: 

This change in propose rule ha been filed to make 

additional changes to a pro osed ne rule that was published 

in the October 1, 2012, iss of t e Utah State Bulletin, on 

page 67. Underlining in the le b low indicates text that has 

been added since the publ a on of the proposed rule 

mentioned above; strike-out i icates text that has been 

deleted. You must view the ch ge in proposed rule and the 

proposed new rule together t u erstand all of the changes 

that will be enforceable sh Id t e agency make this rule 

effective.) 

UTHORIZATION FOR 

T: The changes o this rule do not 

result in any new re uirements to the sta ; therefore, there 

are no anticipated c sts or savings to the st te budget. 

+ LOCAL GOVER MENTS: The changes t this rule do not 

result in any w requirements to loca governments; 

therefore, there re no anticipated costs or s vings to local 

governments. 

• SMALL BU NESSES: Because the rule's a licability to 

existing sour s in Box Elder and Tooele counties is changed 

from source with the potential to emit 2.7 tons pe ear voe 

to sources ith the the potential to emit 5 tons per ar voe, 

the rule ·11 apply to fewer sources in those aunties, 

resulting n a savings of up to $3,500 per ton voe 

remove . 

+ PE SONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINE 

BUSI SSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTI 

Beca se there are no new requirements for persons o er 

tha small businesses, businesses, or local governm t 

en · ies, there are no anticipated costs or savings. 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. I 

NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES 

COSTS FOR AFFECTED 

Be use the rule's applicability to existing sources i Box 

Eide nd Tooele counties is changed from sources h the 

potenti to emit 2.7 tons per year voe to sources ith the 

the pate ial to emit 5 tons per year voe, the rul ill apply 

to fewer s rces in those counties, resulting in savings of 

up to $3,50 er ton of voe removed. 

DIRECT au STIONS REGARDING THIS RUL TO: 

• Mark Be er by phone at 801-536-4000, by at 801-

536-008 , or by Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.g 

HORIZED BY: Bryce Bird, Director 

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 

R307-345. Fabric and Vinyl Coatings. 

R307-345-1. Purpose. 

The purpose of this rule is to limit volatile organic 

compound (VOC) emissions from fabric and vinyl coating operations. 

which use roll knife. or rotograyure coaters and drying ovens. 

R307-345-2. Applicability. 

[R397 3 45 applies ta ftthrie l!Hd 'Ut) I ealltiHg aperlltiaHs, 

iHeh1diJtg rellltetl ele11HiJtg aeti·;ities, wkiek 1:1se rell, letifu, ar 

rett>gl'lh 1:1re eBllters Md dr, iHg a' eHs tftllt ha 1 e the p6teHtiBl t6 emit 2. 7 

t6Hs per ye111 afVOC llftd that 111e laelltetl iJt Bax Elder, Caeke, Da.is, 

Salt Laite, Tuaele. Ut!lh llftd ',\~her eBttHties.]O) R307-345 applies to 

sources located in Cache. Davis Salt Lake. Utah and Weber counties. 

that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons per year or more of voe._ 

including related cleaning activities. 

(2) In Box Elder and Tooele counties R307-345 aoolies to 

the following sources: 

(a) Existing sources as of Febn!azy I 2013 with the 

potential to emit 5 tons per year or more of voe. including related 

cleaning activities· and 

Cb) New sources as of February I. 2013 that have the 

potential to emit 2.7 tons per year or more of voe. including related 

cleaning activities. 

55 
NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES 

R307-345-3. Definitions. 

The following additional definitions apply to R307-345: 

"Coating" means a protective, functional, or decorative film 

applied in a thin layer to a surface j ifleltttli-Hg hieqtters, eflftfflels, 

la!eJtes, aerylies, pei) iifl) 1 ehleFiae, pel)'Ul'eth!IAes, H!l!ltffii ll!la 

S)'fl!hetie rtteeers. It alse ~plies te filrHs applied te p~er, plasties, er 

fflit: l 

"Fabric coating" means the coating or saturation of a textile 

substrate with a knife, roll or rotogravure coater to impart 

characteristics that are not initially present, such as strength, stability, 

water or acid repellency, or appearance. Fabric coatings can include, 

but are not limited to, industrial and electrical tapes, tie cord, utility 

meter seals, imitation leathers, tarpaulins, shoe material, and 

upholstery fabrics. 

"Knife coating" means the application of a coating material 

to a substrate by means of drawing the substrate beneath a blade that 

spreads the coating evenly over the width of the substrate. 

"Roller coating" the coating material is applied to the 

moving fabric, in a direction opposite to the movement of the 

substrate, by hard rubber or steel rolls. 

"Rotogravure coating" means the application of a uniform 

layer of material across the entire width of the web to substrate by 

means of a roll coating technique in which the pattern to be applied is 

etched on the coating roll. The coating material is picked up in these 

recessed areas and is transferred to the substrate. 

''Vinyl coating" means applying a decorative or protective 

top coat, or printing on vinyl coated fabric or vinyl sheets. 

R307-345-4. Emission Standards. 

(1) Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with a 

VOC content in excess of the amounts specified in Table 1 or shall use 

an add-on control device as specified in R307-345-6. 

TABLE 1 

Fabric and Vinyl Coating Limitations 

(values in pounds voe per gallon of coating, minus water...Mll! 

exempt solvents (compounds not classified as VOC), as applied) 

COATING CATEGTORY voe EMlSSlON RATES 

Effective Through 

December 31, 2014 

Fabric 2. 9 

Vinyl 3.B 

voe EMISSION RATES 

Effective Beginning 

January 1, 2015 

(2) Organosol and plastisol coatings shall not be used to 

bubble emissions from vinyl printing and top coating. 

R307-345-5. Work Practices and Record keeping. 

(1) Control techniques and work practices are to be 

implemented at all times to reduce voe emissions from fugitive type 

sources. Control techniques and work practices include: 

(a) Tight fitting covers for open tanks or drums; 

(b) Covered containers for solvent wiping cloths; 

(c) Collection hoods for areas where solvent is used for 

cleanup; 

(d) Covered mixing tanks; and 

( e) Covered hoods and oven routed to add-on control 

devices, which may include, but are not limited to, after burners, 

thermal incinerators, catalytic oxidation, or carbon adsorption. 

56 

DAR File No. 36727 

(2) No person shall apply any coating unless the coating 

application method achieves a demonstrated 65% transfer efficiency. 

The following applications achieve a minimum of 65% 

transfer efficiency and must be operated in accordance with the 

manufacturers specifications: 

(a) Foam coat: 

(bl Flow coat: 

(c) Roll coat: 

Cdl Dip coat: 

(e) Die coat: 

(e) High-volume. low-pressure fHVLP) spray: 

(f) Hand application methods: or 

(g) Other application method capable of achieving at least 

65% transfer efficiency. as certified by the manufacturer, 

(3) All persons shall Qerform solvent cleaning orx:rations 

with cleaning material having voe content of0.21 pounds per gallon 

or less. 

([;!]1) [The e n'Her er epet filer shall fl'lai-Hl!li-H reeertis lfelft 

!he ffll!HliffteRH er Hl!ll aefl'IBHS!ffile eBH'lplill!lee illfh !he erHissiefl 

stll!la!lfas ef R397 348 4.]All sources subject to R307-345 shall 

maintain records demonstrating compliance with all provisions of 

R307-345 on an annual basis. 

fa) Records shall include. but not be limited to. inventory_ 

and product data sheets of all coatings and solvents subject to R307-

ill.. 

(b) These records shall be available to the director UQOn 

R307-345-6. Optional Add-On Controls. 

ilL The owner or operator may install and maintain an 

incinerator, carbon adsorption, or any other add-on emission control 

device, provided that the emission control device will attain at least 

90% efficiency performance. 

(2) The owner or operator of a control device shall provide 

documentation that the emission control system will attain the 

requirements of R307-345-6.[ eertifiefllieH lfefl'I the fl'l!lflttfttemrer th!ll 

the efl'lissiBH eeHtrel S) stefl'I ""ill 1:1tt1:1ifl reqttirea effieieHe) 

perfarrHll!lee.] 

(3) Emission control systems shall be operated and 

maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. 

The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum of two years 

records of operating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that the 

equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the 

manufacturer recommendations. 

R307-345-7. Compliance Schedule. 

( 1) All sources in Davis and Salt Lake counties are subject 

to this rule upon the effective date. 

(2) All sources within Box Elder, Cache, Tooele, Utah and 

Weber counties shall be in compliance with this rule by January I, 

2014. 

KEY: air pollution, emission controls, fabric coating, vinyl coating 

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: [~]2013 

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(1) 

(a) 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. I 
DAR File No. 36728 

\ 

\ 

\ Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

R307-346 

etal Furniture Surface Coatings 

TICE OF CHANGE IN PROPOSED RULE 

DAR FILE NO.: 36728 

FILED: 12/10/2012 

RULE ANALYSIS 

PURPOSE F THE RULE OR REASON 

CHANGE: D ing the public comment period, akeholders 

and existing s all sources expressed their co cerns about 

the 2.7 tons pe year applicability being appli d to existing 

sources in Box der and Tooele counties. he EPA also 

submitted comm nts regarding the r cord keeping 

requirements. Th changes to the prop ed rule are in 

response to these co ments. 

SUMMARY OF THE ULE OR CHAN E: Section R307-

346-2 is changed sta ·ng that in To ele and Box Elder 

counties, as of 02/01 / 13, the rul applies to existing 

sources as of 02/01/201 that have he potential to emit 5 

tons per year or more of OC and pplies to new sources 

that have the potential toe "t 2.7 to s per year or more voe. 

The rule still applies in Cac e, D is, Salt Lake, Utah, and 

Weber counties to sources th h e the potential to emit 2. 7 

tons per year or more VOC. a guage is added to Section 

R307-346-5 to clarify that exem solvents are not included in 

the VOC content limits for the ting used. Section R307-

346-6 is changed to require o ne and operators to maintain 

records demonstrating comp ance ith the rule on an annual 

basis and to require them t make t ose records available to 

the director upon reques. Subs tion R307-346-6(3) is 

amended by adding appli tion requir ents. Section R307-

346-7 is changed to cla fy that the o er or operator must 

provide documentation at the emissio control system will 

attain the requirement of Section R307- 6-6. (DAR NOTE: 

This change in pro osed rule has be n filed to make 

additional changes t a proposed new rule at was published 

in the October 1, 2 12, issue of the Utah tate Bulletin, on 

page 69. Underlin· g in the rule below indica s text that has 

been added sin the publication of the reposed rule 

mentioned abov ; strike-out indicates text t t has been 

deleted. You st view the change in proposed ule and the 

proposed new ule together to understand all of e changes 

that will be forceable should the agency mak this rule 

effective.) 

Y OR CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORIZATI 

: Subsection 19-2-104(1 )(a) 

ANTICI ATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: 

+ TH STATE BUDGET: The changes to this rule do 

resul in any new requirements to the state; therefore, th e 

are o anticipated costs or savings to the state budget. 

+ L CAL GOVERNMENTS: The changes to this rule do no 

re ult in any new requirements to local governments; 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. I 

NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES 

erefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to lo I 

g vernments. 

+ . . ALL BUSIN.ESSES: Because the rule's applicabir y to 

ex1s ng sources 1n Box Elder and Tooele counties is ch nged 

from ources with the potential to emit 2.7 tons per ye r voe 

to sou s with the the potential to emit 5 tons per y r voe, 

the rul will apply to fewer sources in those counties, 

resulting in a savings of up to $2,220 per t of voe 

removed. 

+ PERSO S OTHER THAN SMALL B SINESSES, 

BUSINESS , OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. L ENTITIES: 

Because ther are no new requirements fo persons other 

tha~. small bu inesses, businesses, or I cal government 

ent1t1es, there ar no anticipated costs or s ings. 

THE FULL TEXT F THIS RULE M ~ BE INSPECTED 

DURING REGULA BUSINESS HOURS, , 

ENVIRO MENTAL QUALITY 

AIR Q LITY 

FOU H FLOOR 

195 1950 w 

SA LAKE CITY, UT 84116-3085 

or t the Division of Administrative Rules 

DIRECT UESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE T 

+ Mark erger by phone at 801-536-4000, by F at 801-

536-0 5, or by Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov 

A THORIZED BY: Bryce Bird, Director 

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 

R307-346. Metal Furniture Surface Coatings. 

R307-346-1. Purpose. 

The purpose of this rule is to limit volatile organic 

compound (VOC) emissions from metal furniture surface coating 

operations in aP.Plication areas. flash-off areas. and ovens of metal_ 

furniture coating lines involved in prime and top-coat or single coat. 

Qperations. 

57 
NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES 

R307-346-2. Applicability. 

[R397 3 4 6 llflplies l6 !he llflplietttieH llfeliS, ilask elf ll!'eliS, 

Md e·;ens ef metal fiwltttttre eeatiHg liHes iH • el·;ed iH prime flftd tap 

eettt ef siHgle eettt epefatieHs, iHelt1diHg related eleflHiHg tteti·, ities, tkttt 

l~tt•e the peteHtial te emit 2.7 teHs peF yelif ef\'OC ttHa that eie leetttea 

in BeJ1 Elder, Caeke, Dads, Salt Laite, Tueele, Utah t111d Weber 

eettftties:.J(l) R307-346 applies to sources located in Cache Davis. 

Salt Lake Utah and Weber counties that have the potential to emit 2.7 

tons per year or more ofVOC. including related cleaning activities. 

(2) In Box Elder and Tooele counties. R307-346 applies to 

the following sources: 

fa) Existing sources as of Februai:y 1. 2013 with the 

potential to emit 5 tons per year or more of voe. including related. 

cleaning activities: and 

Cb) New sources as of F eb!Uai:y 1. 2013 that have the 

potential to emit 2.7 tons per year or more ofVOC. including related 

cleaning activities. 

R307-346-3. Exemptions. 

following: 

(1) The requirements of R307-346 do not apply to the 

(a) Stencil coatings; 

(b) Safety-indicating coatings; 

(c) Solid-film lubricants; 

(d) Electrical-insulating and thermal-conducting coatings; 

(e) Touch-up and repair coatings; or 

(f) Coating applications utilizing hand-held aerosol cans. 

R307-346-4. Definitions. 

"Air dried coating" means coatings that are dried by the use 

of air or a forced warm air at temperatures up to 194 degrees 

Fahrenheit. 

"Application area" means the area where the coating is 

applied by spraying, dipping, or flow coating techniques. 

"Baked coating" means a coating that is cured at a 

temperature at or above 194 degrees Fahrenheit. 

"Coating" means a protective, functional, or decorative film 

applied in a thin layer to a surface. This term applies to paints, sealants, 

caulks, inks, adhesives, and maskants. 

"Extreme performance coatings" means coatings designed 

for harsh exposure or extreme environmental conditions. 

"Maskants" means a material that protects a metal surface 

during the etching process. 

"Metal furniture coating" means the surface coating of any 

furniture made of metal or any metal part that will be assembled with 

other metal, wood fabric, plastic, or glass parts to form a furniture 

piece. 

R307-346-5. Emission Standards. 

Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with a VOC 

content in excess of the amounts specified in Table 1 or shall use an 

add-on control device as specified in R307-346-7. 

TABLE 1 

METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING voe LIMITS 

(values in pounds of voe per gallon of coating, minus water_!lli! 

exempt solvents (compounds not classified as voe, as applied) 

58 

DAR File No. 36728 

COATING CATEGORY voe EMISSION RATE 

Baked Air Dried 

General, One Component 2 .3 2. 3 

General, Multi-Component 2 .3 2.B 

Extreme High Gloss 3.0 2.8 

Extreme Performance 3.0 3. 5 

Heat Resistant 3.0 3.5 

Metallic 3.5 3.5 

Pretreatment Coatings 3.5 3.5 

Solar Absorbent 3.0 3.5 

R307-34~. Work Practices. 

( 1) The owner or operator shall: 

(a) Store all VOC-containing coatings, thinners, and 

cleaning materials in closed containers; 

(b) Minimize spills of VOC-containing coatings, thinners, 

and cleaning materials; 

(c) Clean up spills immediately; 

( d) Convey any coatings, thinners, and cleaning materials in 

closed containers or pipes; 

(e) Close mixing vessels that contain VOC coatings and 

other materials except when specifically in use; and 

(f) Minimize usage of solvents during cleaning of storage, 

mixing, and conveying equipment. 

(2) No person shall apply any coating unless the coating 

application method achieves a demonstrated 65% transfer efficiency. 

The following applications achieve a minimum of 65% 

transfer efficiency and shall be operated in accordance with the_ 

manufacturers specifications: 

(a) Electrostatic application: 

(bl Electrodeposition: 

(c) Brush coat: 

Cd) Flow coat: 

(e) Roll coat: 

(fl Dip coat: 

(g) Continuous coating: 

(h) High-volume. low-pressure CliVLPl spray: or 

(i) Other application method capable of achieving at least. 

65% transfer efficiency. as certified by the manufacturer. 

(3) All persons shall perform solvent cleaning operations 

with cleaning material having voe content of 0.21 pounds per gallon 

or less unless such cleaning o.perations are performed within the_ 

control of the emission control system ofR307-346-7. 

([2]:!) [The en'Hef er eperllter shall mttkttaiH Feee1ds &em 

!he m!lfll:lfiletlH'eF !httt aemeRstl'l!tes eempliflHee wi!h !he emissieR 

stttHdltfds ef R397 348 4.]All sources subject to R307-346 shall 

maintain records demonstrating compliance with all provisions of 

R307-346 on an annual basis. 

(a) Records shall include. but not be limited to inventory 

and product data sheets of all coatings and solvents subject to R307-

~ 

fb) These records shall be available to the director upon 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. I 
DAR File No. 36728 

R307-346-7. Optional Add-On Controls. 

( I) The owner or operator may install and maintain an 

incinerator, carbon adsorption, or any other add-on emission control 

device, provided that the emission control device will attain at least 

90% efficiency performance. 

(2) The owner or operator of a control device shall provide 

[ee1'tifie11lieH !iem lhe H'l!lftttfoefttler that lhe emissien eeHtrel S)Stem 

will 11tllliH fetjttireti effieieHe) perferm!lftee ]documentation that the 

emission control system will attain the requirements ofR307-346-7. 

(3) Emission control systems shall be operated and 

maintained in accordance with d1e manufacturer recommendations. 

The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum of two years 

records of operating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that the 

equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the 

manufacturer recommendations. 

R307-346-8. Compliance Schedule. 

(I) All sources in Davis and Salt Lake counties are subject 

to this rule as of the effective date. 

(2) Sources in Box Elder, Cache, Utah, Tooele, and Weber 

counties shall be in compliance with the rule by January I, 2014. 

KEV: air pollution, emission controls, surface coating, metal 

furniture 

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: 

JiGHllO.!.J 

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(1) 

(a) 

nvironmental Quality, Air Quality 

R307-347 

Appliance Surface Coa · gs 

F CHANGE IN PROPOS 

AR FILE NO.: 36729 

ILED: 12/10/2012 

FOR THE 

RULE OR CHANG . Section R307-

stating that in Tooele d Box Elder 

counties, the le applies to existing so ces as of 

02/01 /2013, t at have the potential to emit 5 tons er year or 

more of V C and applies to new sources that ave the 

potential emit 2.7 tons per year or more VOC. The le still 

applies · Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Utah, and Weber co ties 

to so ces that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons per yea or 

mer VOC. Language is added to Section R307-347-5 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. I 

NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES 

clarify that exempt solvents are not included in the V C 

ontent limits for the coating used. Section R307-347- is 

anged to require owners and operators to maintain re rds 

d monstrating compliance with the rule on an annual asis 

an to require them to make those records available o the 

dire or upon request. Subsection R307-347- (3) is 

ame ded by adding application requirements. Secti R307-

347- is changed to clarify that the owner or oper tor must 

provid documentation that the emission control stem will 

attain t requirements of Section R307-347-7. ( J\R NOTE: 

This ch ge in proposed rule has been fil to make 

additional hanges to a proposed new rule that as published 

in the Oct er 1, 2012, issue of the Utah St e Bulletin, on 

page 71. U derlining in the rule below indicat s text that has 

been added since the publication of the proposed rule 

mentioned a ve; strike-out indicates te that has been 

deleted. You ust view the change in pro sed rule and the 

proposed new le together to understan all of the changes 

that will be enfo ceable should the ag cy make this rule 

effective.) 

· The c anges to this rule do not 

result in any new require ents t the state; therefore, there 

are no anticipated costs or avin s to the state budget. 

+ LOCAL GOVERNMENT T e changes to this rule do not 

result in any new requir ents to local governments; 

therefore, there are no antic ated costs or savings to local 

governments. 

+ SMALL BUSINESSES: e se the rule's applicability to 

existing sources in Box El r an Tooele counties is changed 

from sources with the pot ntial to mit 2. 7 tons per year voe 

to sources with the the p tential to mit 5 tons per year voe, 

the rule will apply to fewer so ces in those counties, 

resulting in a saving of up to ,020 per ton of voe 

removed. 

+ PERSONS OT ER 

BUSINESSES, 0 

Because there ar no new requiremen for persons other 

than small busi sses, businesses, or local government 

entities, there ar no anticipated costs or s wings. 

PERSONS: 

Because the le's applicability to existing ources in Box 

Elder and li ele counties is changed from so rces with the 

potential to mit 2.7 tons per year voe to so ces with the 

the potenti I to emit 5 tons per year VOC, the e will apply 

to fewer urces in those counties, resulting in a savings of 

up to $2, 20 per ton of voe removed. 

NTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD 

IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSIN 

se the rule's applicability to existing sources 1 Box 

and Tooele counties is changed from sources wit the 

po ntial to emit 2.7 tons per year voe to sources with the 

th potential to emit 5 tons per year voe, the rule will ap ly 
NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES 

to fe er sources in those counties, resulting in a savings 

up to $ 20 per ton of voe removed. 

RULE TO: 

+ Mark Berger by one at 801-536-40 by FAX at 801-

ernet E-mail at mberger@ ah.gov 

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 

R307-347. Large Appliance Surface Coatings. 

R307-347-1. Purpose. 

The purpose of this rule is to reduce volatile organic 

compound (VOC) emissions from large appliance surface coating 

operations. 

R307-347-2. Applicability. 

[R397 347 fll'!'lies tti lltfge eppliMee et1eti11g t1peretit111s, 

i11el1:uii11g related eleMi11g eeti1ities, thet he1e the pt1te11tiel tti emit 2.7 

tt111s e )eer tifVOC Biid thet B1e leeeted i11 Bel< Elder, Ceelie, 011•,.is, 

Salt Lake, Tueele, Utah, Bild Weber ee1:111ties.]ID R307-347 applies to 

sources located in Cache. Davis. Salt Lak:e. Utah and Weber counties. 

that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons per year or more of voe._ 

including related cleaning activities, 

(2) In Box Elder and Tooele counties R307-347 applies to 

the following sources: 

(a) Existing sources as of February I, 2013. that have the 

potential to emit 5 tons per year or more of VOC. including related. 

cleaning activities· and 

(bl New sources as of February I, 2013. that have the 

potential to emit 2.7 tons per year or more ofVOC. including related 

cleaning activities. 

R307-347-3. Exemptions. 

following: 

(I) The requirements of R307-347 do not apply to the 

(a) Stencil coatings; 

(b) Safety-indicating coatings; 

(c) Solid-film lubricants; 

(d) Electric-insulating and thermal-conducting coatings; 

(e) Touch-up and repair coatings; or 

(t) Coating application utilizing hand-held aerosol cans. 

R307-347-4. Definitions. 

The following additional definitions apply to R307-347: 

"Air dried coating" means coatings that are dried by the use 

60 

DAR File No. 36729 

of air or a forced warm air at temperatures up to 194 degrees 

Fahrenheit. 

"Baked coating" means a coating that is cured at a 

temperature at or above 198 degrees Fahrenheit. 

"Coating" means a protective, functional, or decorative film 

applied in a thin layer to a surface. This term often applies to paints 

such as lacquers or enamels. It is also used to refer to films applied to 

paper, plastics, or foil. 

"Ell.1reme performance coatings" means coatings designed 

for harsh exposure or extreme environmental conditions. 

"Large appliances" means doors, cases, lids, panels, and 

interior support parts of residential and commercial washers, dryers, 

ranges, refrigerators, freezers, water heaters, dishwashers, trash 

compactors, air conditioners, and other similar products. 

R307-347-5. Emission Standards. 

Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with a VOC 

content in excess of the amounts specified in Table 1 or shall use an 

add-on control device as specified in R307-347-7. 

TABLE 1 

Large Appliance Coating Limitations 

(values in pounds voe per gallon of coating, minus water...!Ul! 

exempt solvents(compounds not classified as VOC), as applied) 

COATING CATEGORY voe EMISSION RATES 

Baked Air Dried 

Genera 1, one component 2.3 

Genera 1, multi -component 2.3 

Extreme high gloss 3.0 

Extreme performance 3.0 

Heat resistance 3.0 

Solar absorbent 3.0 

Metallic 3.5 

Pretreatment coatings 3.5 

R307-347-6. Work Practices and Recordkeeping. 

( 1) The owner or operator shall: 

2 .3 

2.8 

2.8 

3.5 

3.5 

3. 5 

3.5 

3. 5 

(a) Store all VOC-containing coatings, thinners, and 

cleaning materials in closed containers; 

(b) Minimize spills of VOC-containing coatings, thinners, 

and cleaning materials; 

(c) Clean up spills immediately; 

(d) Convey any coatings, thinners, and cleaning materials in 

closed containers or pipes; 

(e) Close mixing vessels that contain VOC coatings and 

other materials except when specifically in use; and 

(f) Minimize usage of solvents during cleaning of storage, 

mixing, and conveying equipment. 

(2) All sources subject to R307-347[The e·n•11er tir t1pe1eter] 

shall maintain records [ lftim the mflHttfaetttrer th et ]demonstrat[ es ]in.g 

compliance with all provisions of R307-347 on an annual basis,[tfte. 

emissit111 steridlll'ds tifR397 348 S.] 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. I 
DAR File No. 36729 

(a) Records shall include. but not be limited to. inventory 

and product data sheets of all coatings and solvents subject to R307-

fil 

(b) These records shall be made available to the director 

upon request 

(3) No person shall apply any coating unless the coating 

application method achieves a demonstrated 65% transfer efficiency. 

The following applications achieve a minimum of 65% transfer_ 

efficiency and shall be operated in accordance with the manufacturers 

specifications: 

(a) Electrostatic application: 

(bl Electrodeposition: 

(cl Brush coat' 

(d) Flow coat· 

(el Roll coat: 

(Q Dipcoat· 

(g) High-volume. low-pressure (HVLP) spray: or 

(h) Other application method capable of achieving at least 

65% transfer efficiency. as certified by the manufacturer. 

(4) All persons shall perfonn solvent cleaning operations 

with cleaning materials having voe content of0.21 pounds per gallon 

!lill.&. 

R307-347-7. Optional Add-On Controls. 

( 1) The owner or operator may install and maintain an 

incinerator, carbon adsorption, or any other add-on emission control 

device, provided that the emission control device will attain at least 

90% efficiency perfonnance. 

(2) The owner or operator of a control device shall provide 

[eeftifieatieH)documentation [ffiiffi the ffiflllttfaeatreF ]that the emission 

control system will attain the require[tl]ments of R307-347-

1[ eftieieHe) l"erfufffifll!ee]. 

(3) Emission control systems shall be operated and 

maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. 

The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum of two years 

records of operating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate ~at the 

equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the 

manufacturer recommendations. 

R307-347-8. Compliance Schedule. 

(I) All sources in Davis and Salt Lake counties are subject 

to this rule as of the effective date of this rule. 

(2) Sources in Box Elder, Cache, Tooele, Utah and Weber 

counties shall be in compliance with this rule by January I, 2014. 

KEY: air pollution, emission controls, large appliance, surface 

coating 

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: [ioH)2013 

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(1) 

(a) 

.-1 ty 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. I 

NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES 

NOTICE OF CHANGE IN PROPOSED RULE 

DAR FILE NO.: 36730 

FILED: 12/10/2012 

RULE ANALYSIS 

OSE OF THE RULE OR REASON FO 

CHA GE: During the public comment period, the D. ision of 

Air Qu lity (DAQ) received several comments fro the EPA 

and the 'ndustry that resulted in the need to make bstantive 

changes o the proposed rule. 

SUMMAR OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The pplicability of 

the rule is anged to only apply to existing urces in Box 

Elder and ~ oele counties as of 02/01/201 that have the 

potential to e it 5 tons per year or more of V. C and to apply 

to new sour in Box Elder and Tooel counties as of 

02/01/2013 that ave the potential to emit .7 tons per year or 

more VOC. The ule still applies in Gach , Davis, Salt Lake, 

Utah, and Weber ounties to sources th t have the potential 

to emit 2.7 tons pe year or more VOC Language is added 

to Subsection R30 348-4(1) to clari that exempt solvents 

are not included in th VOC coating c ntent limits. Language 

is added to Subsectio R307-348-5( to require that sources 

make records availa le to the director upon request. 

Subsection R307-348- 2) is ch nged to clarify that the 

owner or operator of a gnet w. e coatings operation shaU 

provide documentation th t the mission control system will 

attain the requirements of cti n R307-348-6. (DAR NOTE: 

This change in proposed r e has been filed to ~ake 

additional changes to a propo ed new rule that was published 

in the October 1, 2012, iss of the Utah State Bulletin, on 

page 73. Underlining in the rul below indicates text that has 

been added since the bli ion of the proposed rule 

mentioned above; strike ut in ·cates text that has been 

deleted. You must view e chang in proposed rule and the 

proposed new rule tog er to und stand all of the changes 

that will be enforceab should the agency make this rule 

effective.) 

STATUTORY OR C NSTITUTIONAL A THORIZATION FOR 

THIS RULE: Subs ction 19-2-104(1 )(a) 

ANTICIPATED C ST OR SAVINGS TO: 

+THE STATE DGET: There are no ne 

the state; ther ore, there are no anticipated 

to the state b get. 

+ LOCAL G ERNMENTS: There are no ne requirements 

to local go ernments; therefore, there are n anticipated 

costs or sa ings to local governments. 

+ SMALL USINESSES: Because the rule's ap icability to 

existing urces in Box Elder and Tooele counties i changed 

from so rces with the potential to emit 2.7 tons per ar voe 

to sour es with the potential to emit 5 tons per year C, the 

rule w. I apply to fewer sources in those counties, res ting in 

a sa ngs of up to $8,528 per year per small source. 
NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES 

+ PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, 

BU NESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIE 

Ther are no new requirements; therefore, there are 

anticip ed costs or savings to persons other than 

busines s, businesses, or local government entities. 

COSTS FOR AFFECTED 

Because the rule's applicability to existing sourc s in Box 

Elder and Too le counties is changed from sour s with the 

potential to emi 2.7 tons per year voe to so ces with the 

potential to emit tons per year voe, the r will apply to 

fewer sources in t se counties, resulting in savings of up 

to $8,528 per year p small source. 

isting sources in Box 

d from sources with the 

voe to sources with the 

voe, the rule will apply to 

, resulting in a savings of up 

ur . 

DIRECT Q STIONS REGARDING THIS RULE 

• Mark B ger by phone at 801-536-4000, by F at 801-

536-008 , or by Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov 

HORIZED BY: Bryce Bird, Director 

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 

R307-348. Magnet Wire Coatings. 

R307-348-1. Purpose. 

The purpose of this rule is to limit volatile organic 

compound (VOC) emissions from ovens of magnet wire coating 

operations. 

R307-348-2. Applicability. 

[R397 3 4 8 fl!'!' lies t6 mttgHet ol'ire eetttiHg 6flel'lltiens thttt 

Hlt'te Eke p6teHtiHI t6 emit 2. 7 t6H3 per ye!ll ef voe HHS ll!'e leeHted iH 

Bell Elder, Ctteke, DH, is, !>Hit LHlce, Tueele, Ul:!lfl HHe Weber e6ttftties.] 

(I) R307-348 applies to sources located in Cache Davis. Salt Lake. 

Utah and Weber counties that have the potential to emit 2 7 tons per. 

year or more ofVOC including related cleaning activities 

62 

DAR File No. 36730 

(2) In Box Elder and Tooele counties. R307-348 applies to 

the following sources· 

lal Existing sources as of February I. 2013. with the 

potential to emit 5 tons per vear or more of voe. including related. 

cleaning activities: and 

(bl New sources as of February I. 2013. that have the 

potential to emit 2,7 tons per year or more ofVOC including related 

cleaning activities, 

R307-348-3. Definitions. 

The following additional definition applies to R307-348: 

"Magnet wire coating" means the process of applying 

coating of electrical insulating varnish or enamel to aluminum or 

copper wire for use in electrical machinery. 

R307-348-4. Emission Standards. 

(I) No owner or operator of a magnet wire coating oven may 

cause, allow or permit discharge into the atmosphere of any VOC[ s] in 

excess of 0.20 kilograms per liter of coating (l.7 pounds per gallon), 

excluding water, and exempt solvents (compounds not classified as 

VOCsl delivered to the coating applicator from magnet wire coating 

operations. 

(a) Equivalency calculations for coatings shall be performed 

in units of pounds voes per gallon of solid rather than pounds voes 

per gallon of coating when determining compliance. 

(b) The equivalent emission limit is 2.2 pounds voes per 

gallon solids. 

(2) The emission limitations specified above shall be 

achieved by: 

(a) The application of low solvent content coating 

technology; or 

(b) The use of an add-on control device on magnet wire 

coating ovens as specified in R307-348-6. 

R307-348-5. Work Practices and Recordkeeping. 

(I) The owner or operator shall: 

(a) Store all VOC-containing coatings and cleaning 

materials in closed containers; 

(b) Minimize spills of VOC-containing coatings and 

cleaning materials; 

(c) Clean up spills immediately; 

( d) Convey any coatings, thinners, and cleaning materials in 

closed containers or pipes; 

(e) Close mixing vessels that contain VOC coatings and 

other materials except when specifically in use; and 

(t) Minimize usage of solvents during cleaning of storage, 

mixing, and conveying equipment. 

(2) [The eo'll:ef ar epel'lltar skttll mttifttHifl reeel't!s lfem !he 

ft'IMttfftetl:tl er th Ht demeHstl'llte eeffl!'lillftee wiEk the efflissiaH stllftdHl't!s 

efR397 3 48 4.]All sources subject to R307-348 shall maintain records 

demonstrating compliance with all provisions of R307-348 and these. 

records shall be available to the director u.oon request. 

R307-34~. Optional Add-On Controls. 

(I) The owner or operator may install and maintain an 

incinerator provided that the emission control device will attain at least 

90% efficiency performance. 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. I 
DAR File No. 36730 

(2) The owner or operator of a control device shall provide 

[eel'titiee!iealdocwnentation that the emission control system will 

attain the requirements ofR307-348-6 [ ifflm the m1111ttfeeftlfef thet the 

efflissieH eea!fflJ S)'S!effl wilJ 11MftiH reqttif ea effieieae) peffefflll!Hee.] 

(3) Emission control systems shall be operated and 

maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. 

The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum of two years 

records of operating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that the 

equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the 

manufacturer recommendations. 

R307-348-7. Compliance Schedule. 

(1) All sources in Davis and Salt Lake counties are subject 

to this rule as of the effective date of this rule. 

(2) Sources in Box Elder, Cache, Utah, Tooele, and Weber 

counties shall be in compliance with this rule by January 1, 2014. 

KEY: air pollution, emission controls, surface coating, magnet 

wire 

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: [~)2013 

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(1) 

(a) 

Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

R307-349 

Flat Wood Panel Coatings 

OF CHANGE IN PROPOSED 

DAR FILE NO.: 36731 

FILED: 12/10/2012 

SUMMARY OF THE RU OR C 

FOR THE 

349-2 is changed staf g that in ele and Box Elder 

counties, the rule plies to exist1 sources as of 

02/01 /2013, that hav the potential to emi 5 tons per year or 

more of VOC and applies to new sour that have the 

potential to emit 2 tons per year or more VO . The rule still 

applies in Gach , Davis, Salt Lake, Utah, and ber counties 

to sources tha ave the potential to emit 2.7 ton 

more VOC. A definition for "Strippable booth ating" is 

added to S tion R307-349-3. Language is added t Section 

R307-349 to clarify that exempt solvents are not incl ed in 

the VO content limits for the coating used. Subs ion 

R307- 149-5(2) is amended by adding applica ·on 

requ· ements. Subsection R307-349-5(4) is changed 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. 1 

NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES 

require owners and operators to maintain reco s 

demonstrating compliance with the rule on an annual b sis 

nd to require them to make those records available t the 

·rector upon request. Section R307-349-6 is chang d to 

cl rify that the owner or operator must provide docume tation 

tha the emission control system will attain {he requir ments 

of ection R307-349-6. (DAR NOTE: This ch nge in 

prop ed rule has been filed to make additional cha ges to a 

propo d new rule that was published in the Octob 1, 2012, 

issue o the Utah State Bulletin, on page 74. Un erlining in 

the rule elow indicates text that has been add since the 

publicatio of the proposed rule mentioned abo e; strike-out 

indicates xt that has been deleted. You ust view the 

change in oposed rule and the proposed ne rule together 

to understa all of the changes that will e enforceable 

should the ag ncy make this rule effective.) 

STATUTORY 0 CONSTITUTIONAL AUT 

THIS RULE: Su section 19-2-104(1)(a) 

COMPLIANCE FOR AFF TED PERSONS: 

Because the rule' applicability to exist g sources in Box 

Elder and Tooele aunties is changed fro sources with the 

potential to emit .7 tons per year voe to sources with the 

the potential to mit 5 tons per year voe, t rule will apply 

to fewer sour in those counties, resulting ·n a savings of 

up to $2, 110 p r ton of voe removed. 

COMMENT BY THE DEPARTMENT HEA 

FISCAL IM ~CT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BU 

Because e rule's applicability to existing sour s in Box 

Elder an Tooele counties is changed from source with the 

potential 0 emit 2.7 tons per year voe to sources ith the 

the pot tial to emit 5 tons per year VOC, the rule WI apply 

to few r sources in those counties, resulting in a savi gs of 

up to 2, 110 per ton of voe removed. 

63 
NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES 

THE LL TEXT OF THIS RULE MAY BE INSPECT 

DURING GULAR BUSINESS HOURS, AT: 

EN ONMENTAL QUALITY 

AIR Q LITY 

FOURTH OOR 

195 N 1950 

SALT LAKE Cl 

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 

R307-349. Flat Wood Panel Coatings. 

R307-349-l. Purpose. 

The pwpose of R307-349 is to limit volatile organic 

compound (VOC) emissions from flat wood paneling coating sources. 

R307-349-2. Applicability. 

[R397 349 llf'!'lies te flat weetl paneliHg eefttiHg epel'!llieHs, 

ir.elt1tliflg Feltttetl ele1tt1ir1g aeti¥iaes, iliat ha1 e die peteHaal te emit 2.7 

t6HS per ) eM ef VOC 11Htl iliftt 1t1 e leeatetl in Bex EltleF, Caehe, Dlt"lis, 

8alt Lake, 'Feeele, Utttk, Mt! Webe1 eettHties. ](J) R307-349 aoplies to 

sources located jn Cache Davis Salt Lake. Utah and Weber counties. 

that have the potential to emit 2 7 tons per year or more of voe._ 

including related cleaning activities 

(2) In Box Elder and Tooele counties R307-349 apples to 

the following sources: 

(a) Existing sources as of February I. 2013 with the_ 

potential to emit 5 tons per year or more of voe. including related. 

cleaning activities: and 

(b) New sources as of February I. 2013 that have the 

potential to emit 2,7 tons per year or more of voe including related 

cleaning activities, 

R307-349-3. Definitions. 

The following additional definitions apply to R307-349: 

"Coating" means a protective, decorative, or functional 

material applied in a thin layer to a surface. Such materials may 

include paints, topcoats. varnishes, sealers, stains, washcoats, 

basecoats, inks, and temporary protective coatings. 

"Finishing material" means a coating used in the flat wood 

panel industry, including basecoats, stains, washcoats, sealers, and 

topcoats. 

"Flat wood paneling" means wood paneling products that 

are any decorative interior, exterior or tileboard (class I hardboard) 

panel to which a protective, decorative, or functional material or layer 

has been applied. 

"Sealer" means a finishing material used to seal the pores of 

a wood substrate before additional coats of finishing material are 

applied. A washcoat used to optimize aesthetics is not a sealer. 

"Strippable booth coating" means a coating that is applied to 

a booth wall to provide a protective film to receive oyerspra,y during 

64 

DAR File No. 36731 

finishing and that is subsequently peeled and disposed. Strippable 

booth coatings are intended to reduce or eliminate the need to use_ 

o~anic solvents to clean booth walls 

"Tileboard" means a premium interior wall paneling product 

made of hardboard that meets the specifications for Class I given by 

the standardANSVAHAAJ35.4-1995. 

R307-349-4. Emission Standards. 

(I) Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with a 

voe content in excess of 2.1 pounds of voe per gallon, excluding 

water and exempt solvents (compounds not classified as VOC). The 

equivalent emission limit shall be 2.9 pounds voes per gallon solids 

coating; or 

(2) Each owner or operator shall use an add-on control 

device as specified in R307-349-6. 

R307-349-S. Work Practice and Recordkeeping. 

(I) The owner or operator shall: 

(a) Store all VOC-containing coatings, thinners, and 

cleaning materials in closed containers; 

(b) Minimize spills of VOC-containing coatings, thinners, 

and cleaning materials; 

( c) Clean up spills immediately; 

( d) Convey any coatings, thinners, and cleaning materials in 

closed containers or pipes; 

(e) Close mixing vessels that contain VOC coatings and 

other materials except when specifically in use; and 

(f) Minimize usage of solvents during cleaning of storage, 

mixing, and conveying of equipment. 

(2) No person shall apply anY coating unless the coating 

application method achieves a demonstrated 65% transfer efficiency. 

The following applications achieve a minimum of 65% 

transfer efficiency and shall be onerated in accordance with the 

manufacturers specifications: 

fa) Paint brush: 

fb) Flow coat· 

(c) Roll coat· 

fd) Dip coat: 

(e) Detailing or touch-up guns: 

(e) High-volume. low-pressure <H\TLP) spray· 

(Q Hand application methods: or 

fg) Other application method capable of achieving at least 

65% transfer efficiency !IS certified by the manufacturer, 

(3) No person shall use omanic solvents for cleaning 

operations that exceed a voe content ofO 21 pounds per gallon and a 

strippable booth coating with a voe content in excess of 3,8 pounds 

per gallon. excluding Water and exempt solvents (compounds that are 

not defined as YOC) 

([~]:!) [The e n'llef er epefftter shall H!ainaM reeertls WeHI 

the H!anttfaetttrer iliftt tleH!eHs!fllte eeHlpliMee 11-iili ilie el!l:issieH 

s!tt!ltlflftls ef R397 348 4.]All sources subject to R307-349 shall 

maintain records demonstrating compliance with all provisions of 

R307-349 on an annual basis. 

fa) Records should include but not be limited to. inventoQ' 

and products data sheets of all coatings and solvents subject to R307-

lli, 

fb) TI1ese records shall be available to the Director upon 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January OJ, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. I 
DAR File No. 36731 

R307-349-6. Optional Add-On Controls. 

( 1) The owner or operator may install and maintain an 

incinerator, carbon adsorption, or any other add-on emission control 

device, provided that the emission control device will attain at least 

90% efficiency performance. 

(2) The owner or operator of a control device shall provide 

[eel'tiiiealiefl ifem !he fflllll:ttfuefttler !hllt !he emissieH eeHtrel s,stem 

will llttain Feljt!Wed elfleieHe~ iierfel'fllBHee ]documentation that the 

emission control system will attain the requirements ofR307-349-6. 

(3) Emission control systems shall be operated and 

maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. 

The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum of two years 

records of operating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that the 

equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the 

manufacturer recommendations. 

R307-349-7. Compliance Schedule. 

( 1) All sources in Davis and Salt Lake counties are subject 

to this rule as of the effective date of this rule. 

(2) Sources in Box Elder, Cache, Tooele, Utah and Weber 

counties shall be in compliance with this rule by January 1, 2014. 

KEY: air pollution, emission controls, flat wood paneling, coatings 

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: [~)lill 

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(1) 

(a) 

Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

R307-350 

cellaneous Metal Parts a 

Products Coatings 

CHANGE IN PROPO 

R FILE NO.: 3673 

LED: 12/10/201 

FOR THE 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. 1 

NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES 

more of VOC and applies to new sources that have t e 

potential to emit 2.7 tons per year or more VOC. The rule till 

applies in Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Utah, and Weber cou ies 

o sources that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons per y r or 

ore VOC. The exemptions section of the rule was ch nged 

b adding surface coating of aerospace vehicl and 

co ponents and military munitions manufactured b or for 

the rmed Forces of the United States as exempt f m Rule 

R30 350. A definition for "Aerospace veh' les and 

comp ent" was added to Section R307-350-4. nguage is 

added Section R307-350-5 to clarify that exe pt solvents 

are not 'ncluded in the voe content limits fa the coating 

used. Section R307-350-6 is changed by adding 

electrode sition as an acceptable applicati n method. A 

VOC conte t for cleaning material is added t Section R307-

350-7. Se tion R307-350-7 is also ch ged to require 

owners and perators to maintain recor s demonstrating 

compliance wi the rule on an annual b sis and to require 

them to make ose records available the director upon 

request. (DAR OTE: This change i proposed rule has 

been filed to mak additional changes t a proposed new rule 

that was publishe in the October 1, 12, issue of the Utah 

State Bulletin, on ge 76. Under· ing in the rule below 

indicates text that ha been added si ce the publication of the 

proposed rule mentio ed above; s 1ke-out indicates text that 

has been deleted. Yo must vie the change in proposed 

rule and the proposed w rule gether to understand all of 

the changes that will be force le should the agency make 

this rule effective.) 

lONAL AUTHORIZATION FOR 

104(1)(a) 

SES: Because the rule's applicability to 

existing sources i Box Elder and Tooele aunties is changed 

from sources wi the potential to emit 2.7 ans per year VOC 

to sources with he the potential to emit 5 t s per year voe, 

the rule will apply to fewer sources in those counties, 

resulting in a avings from $238 up to $2,02 er ton of voe 

removed. 

+ PERS S OTHER THAN SMALL 

BUSINES ES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTA 

Because here are no new requirements for pe sons other 

than s all businesses, businesses, or local vernment 

entities there are no anticipated costs or savings. 

LlANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PE 

Be use the rule's applicability to existing sources 

El r and Tooele counties is changed from sources wi 

p ential to emit 2. 7 tons per year voe to sources wit the 

t e potential to emit 5 tons per year voe, the rule will a ly 

65 
NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES 

TH~ LL TEXT OF THIS RULE MAY BE INSPE 

DURING GULAR BUSINESS HOURS, AT: 

EN ONMENTAL QUALITY 

AIR Q LITY 

FOURTH OOR 

195 N 1950 

SALT LAKE Cl 

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 

R307-352. Metal Container, Closure, and Coil Coatings. 

R307-352-1. Purpose. 

The ptrrpose of this rule is to reduce volatile organic 

compound (VOe) emissions from the coating of metal coils, cans, 

[tlrttms;-]pails, and lids in the manufacturing or reconditioning process. 

R307-352-2. Applicability. 

[R307 3S2 tlpj'lies te t\11 eetltiHg epei tltietls, iHeltttliflg 

rellltetl ele!tlling tleti 'ities, in the H'll!flttfaetttring er reeeHtlitieniflg ef 

mettll et\llS, tit tt!l'IS, pl!ils, 111'16 lies tfttlt htl, e the petentitll te efflit 2. 7 

ten! t\ )ell!' efVOC !lfltt tkllt 111e leelltetl ifl Bex Eltler, Ctlehe, DR.is, 

Stllt Llllre, Tueele, Ult\h !tlltt \lleeer eetlflties. ](J) R307-352 applies to 

sources located in Cache. Davis Salt Lake Utah and Weber counties 

that have the potential to emit 2. 7 tons per year or more of voe._ 

including related cleaning activities. 

(2) In Box Elder and Tooele Counties. R307-352 applies to 

the following sources: 

(a) Existing sources as of February 1 2013 with the 

potential to emit 5 tons per year or more of voe. including related. 

cleaning activities· and 

<bl New sources as of February I 2013 that have the 

potential to emit 2.7 tons per year or more ofVOC including related 

cleaning activities. 

R307-352-3. Definitions. 

The following additional definitions apply to R307-352: 

"[teit-e J.coating" means a protective. functional or 

ciecorative film applied in a thin layer to a surface. [ t\fl)' eetltiug t\pj'lietl 

te mettll sheets er sl:fips whieh 111 e then relletl inte eeils fur fttr'.her 

intlttsb'itl! er eelfllflereitll ttse.] 

"End sealing compound" means a compound which is 

coated onto can ends and which functions as a gasket when the end is 

assembled onto the can. 

"Exterior body spray" means a coating sprayed on the 

exterior of the container body to provide a decorative or protective 

finish. 

"Interior body spray" means a coating sprayed on the interior 

of the can body to provide a protective film between the product and 

the can. 

74 

DAR File No. 36734 

"Metal container or closure coating" means any coating 

applied to either the interior or exterior of formed metal cans, [ tlrttms;-] 

pails, lids or crowns or flat metal sheets which are intended to be 

formed into cans,[~] pails, lids or crowns. 

"Overvarnish" means a coating applied directly over a 

design coating to reduce the coefficient of friction, to provide gloss and 

to protect the finish against abrasion and corrosion. 

"Reconditioned [tlrttms;--]pails or lids" means any metal 

container which is reused, recycled or remanufactured. 

"Three-piece can side-seam coating" means a coating 

sprayed on the exterior and/or interior of a welded, cemented or 

soldered seam to protect the exposed metal. 

''Two-piece can exterior-end coating" means a coating 

applied to the exterior bottom end of a can to reduce the coefficient of 

friction and to provide protection to the metal. 

R307-352-4. Emission Standards. 

Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with a voe 

content in excess of the amounts specified in Table 1 or shall use an 

add-on control device as specified in R307-352-6. 

TABLE 1 

METAL CONTAINER AND CLOSURE COIL COATING LIMITATIONS 

(values in pounds voe per gallon of coating, minus waterJ!!l[ 

exempt solvents (comoounds not classified as VOC), as applied) 

COATING CATEGORY voe EMISSION RATES 

CANS 

Sheet basecoat (interior and exterior) 

and overvarnish 1.9 

Two-piece can exterior basecoat, 

overvarnish, and end coating 2.1 

Interior body spray 

Two-piece cans 3. 5 

Three-piece cans 3.0 

Three-piece can side seam spray 5.5 

End sealing compound: Food cans, non-food 

cans, and beverage cans 0.1 

Exterior body spray 

[9AOO,-] PAILS AND LIDS 

Body spray 

Reconditioned interior 

Reconditioned exterior 

New interior 

New exterior 

End sealing compound[1 Feed ll•1111s aRil 

ReR feed """"'s] 

Inks, all applications 

Coil 

Coil coating 

3.5 

4.2 

3.5 

3.5 

2.8 

0.5 

2. 5 

1. 7 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. 1 
DAR File No. 36734 

R307-3S2-S. Work Practices and Record keeping. 

( 1) The owner or operator shall: 

(a) Store all VOC-containing coatings, thinners, and 

cleaning materials in closed containers; 

(b) Minimize spills of VOC-containing coatings, thinners, 

and cleaning materials; 

(c) Clean up spills immediately; 

(d) Convey any coatings, thinners, and cleaning materials in 

closed containers or pipes; 

(e) Close mixing vessels that contain VOC coatings and 

other materials except when specifically in use; and 

(f) Minimize usage of solvents during cleaning of storage, 

mixing, and conveying equipment. 

(2) No person shall apply any coating un]ess the coating 

application method achieves a demonstrated 65% transfer efficiency. 

The following aoolications achieve a minimum of 65% 

transfer efficiency and shall be operated in accordance with the 

manufacturers specifications: 

(a) Electrostatic application: 

<b) Flow coat: 

(c) Roll coat: 

(d) Dip coat: 

(e) High-volume. low-pressure CHVLP) spray: 

(D Hand application methods: 

(g) Printing techniaues: or 

Ch) Other amilication method capable of achieving at least 

65% transfer efficiency. as certified by the manufacturer. 

f3) All persons shall oerform solvent cleaning operations 

with cleaning material having voe content of 0.21 lb/gallon or less. 

([i!]:!) [The 6 dtter er 6flerliter sk11ll m11iritttifl reeeffis tfem 

l:lte ft'lllllttflleftlfer lhlll eemeflstrllles etltt'lflli1111ee uil:lt l:lte emissiefl 

st1111ellffis ef R397 348 4.]All sources subject to R307-352 shall 

maintain records demonstrating compliance with all provisions of 

R307-352 on an annual basis. 

fa) Records shall include. but not be limited to. inventory 

and product data sheets of all coatings and solvents subject to R307-

ill. 

(b) These records shall be made available to the director 

upon request. 

R307-3S2-6. Optional Add-On Controls. 

(1) The owner or operator may install and maintain an 

incinerator, carbon adsorption, or any other add-on emission control 

device, provided that the emission control device will attain at least 

90% efficiency performance. 

(2) The owner or operator of a control device shall provide 

[eertifieetieA]documentation [&em the ft'lllflttflleftlfer ]that the emission 

control system will attain~ requirements[e] of R307-352-

~[ effieieAey fleri&mllf!ee]. 

(3) Emission control systems shall be operated and 

maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. 

The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum of two years 

records of operating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that the 

equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the 

manufacturer recommendations. 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. 1 

NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES 

R307-352-7. Compliance Schedule. 

All sources within Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake. 

Tooele, Utah and Weber counties shall be in compliance with this rule 

by January 1, 2014. 

KEY: air pollution, emission controls, metal containers, coil 

coatings 

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: [2GH]2013 

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(1) 

(a) 

Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

R307-353 

Plastic Parts Coatings 

JICE OF CHANGE IN PROPOSED 

DAR FILE NO.: 36735 

FILED: 12/10/2012 

RULE ANALYSIS 

THE RULE OR REA N FOR THE 

CHANGE: Duri g the public comment p iod, stakeholders 

and existing sma sources expressed t ir concerns about 

the 2. 7 tons per ar applicability bei applied to existing 

sources in Box El r and Tooele co ties. The EPA also 

submitted comme s regarding the record-keeping 

requirements, a lack f a voe c ntent limit for cleaning 

materials, and the lac of transf efficiency requirements. 

The changes to the pro sed ru are in response to these 

comments. 

R CHANGE: Section R307-

t in Tooele and Box Elder 

counties, the rule appli s o existing sources as of 

02/01/2013, that have the oten ·al to emit 5 tons per year or 

more of voe and app es to n w sources that have the 

potential to emit 2.7 to per year more VOC. The rule still 

applies in Cache, Dav· , Salt Lake, tah, and Weber counties 

to sources that have e potential to it 2.7 tons per year or 

more voe. Sect· n R307-353-4 i amended by adding 

definitions for " eta Ilic coating," ' ilitary specification 

coating," "mirror acking," "mold-seal co ting," "multi-colored 

coating," "m i-component coating," "one-component 

coating," and" ptical coating." Language i added to Section 

R307-353-5 clarify that exempt solvents a not included in 

the VOC c tent limits for the coating used. Table 3, which 

lists new lastic product coating categories d their voe 

emission imits, is also added to Section R307- 3-5. A new 

Section 307-353-6 is added for coating applicati n methods. 

Sectio R307-353-7 is changed by adding a V C content 

limit or cleaning materials and by requiring o ers and 

ope tors to maintain records demonstrating complia ce with 
NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES 

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. 

R307-354. Automotive Refinishing Coatings. 

R307-354-l. Purpose. 

The purpose of R307-354 is to limit volatile organic 

compound emissions (VOC) from automotive refinishing sources. 

R307-354-2. Applicability. 

[R3G7 35 4 epplies te 1tt1l6m6ti • e refinishing s6tlf'ees, 

iHelttttiflg rel11tetl elellftiflg 6perllli6HS, th11t h11 • e the p6leflti11I te emit 

2.7 t6f1S per )elll 6P/OC llfltt 11re IBe11tetl in B6i< Eltler, C11ehe, Dll'tis, 

S11lt Lake, Tuaele, Utllh llfttt Weber e6t111ties.]m R307-354 applies to 

sources located in Cache Davis. Salt Lake Utah and Weber counties. 

that have the potential to emit 2 7 tons per year or more of voe . including related cleaning activities. 

(2) In Box Elder and Tooele coypties. R307-354 applies to 

the following sources· 

fal Existing sources as of February I. 2013 with the 

potential to emit 5 tons per year or more of voe including related. 

cleaning activities: and 

(bl New sources as of February I. 2013 that have the 

potential to emit 2.7 tons per year or more ofVOC including related 

cleaning activities. 

(3) The requirements of R307-354 shall not apply to any 

canned aerosol coating products. 

R307-354-3. Definitions. 

The following additional definitions apply to R307-354: 

"Adhesion promoter" means a coating which is labeled and 

formulated to be applied to uncoated plastic surfaces to facilitate 

bonding of subsequent coatings, and on which, a subsequent coating is 

applied. 

"Automotive" means passenger cars, vans, motorcycles, 

trucks, buses, golf carts and all other mobile equipment. 

"Automotive refinishing" means the process of coating 

automobiles. after-market automobiles, motorcycles, light and 

medium-duty trucks and vans that are performed in auto body shop.:i, 

auto repair shops, production paint shops, new car dealer repair and 

paint shops, fleet operation repair and paint shops, and any other 

facility which coats vehicles under the Standard Industrial 

Classification Code 7532 (Top, Body and Upholstery Repair Shops 

and Paint Shops). This includes dealer repair of vehicles damaged in 

transit. It does not include refinishing operations for other types of 

mobile equipment, such as farm machinery and construction 

equipment or their parts, including partial body collision repairs, that is 

subsequent to the original coating applied at an automobile original 

equipment manufacturing plant. 

80 

DAR File No. 36736 

"Clear coating" means any coating that contains no pigments 

and is labeled and formulated for application over a color coating or 

clear coating. 

"Coating" means a protective, decorative, or functional 

material applied in a thin layer to a surface. Such materials may 

include paints, topcoats, varnishes, sealers, stains, washcoats, 

basecoats, inks, and temporary protective coatings. 

"Color coating" means any pigmented coating, excluding 

adhesion promoters, primers, and multi-color coatings, that requires a 

subsequent clear coating and which is applied over a primer, adhesion 

promoter, or color coating. Color coatings include metallic and 

iridescent color coatings. 

[ "Cttt ifl, 6r jllfflhing, elearea11t" nteftfls 11 fast BF) iHg; relltt) 

te spr11) eleftfe611t epplietl te s1:11 fuees stteh 11S tt66r jllfflhs llfttt trttnk llfttt 

h66tl etlges t6 11116" fur qttiek el6Stll'e. 

"El11Stemerie ea11tiHg" ntellfls 11 eBllliflg tlesignetl fBr 

epplieftti6fl 6' er llei<ible plllts, stteh llS el11Stemerie bttffipers. 

] "Enclosed paint gun cleaner" means a cleaner consisting of a 

closed container with a door or top that can be opened and closed and 

fitted with cleaning connections. The spray gun is attached to a 

connection, and solvent is pumped through the gun and onto the 

exterior of the gun. Cleaning solvent falls back into the cleaner's 

solvent reservoir for recirculation. 

[ "Finishing mllteriftl" mellfts 11 e611liflg ttsetl in the 11ttt6ffl6ti .e 

ret'i11ishiflg iflttt!StF)', ineltteiflg b11Seeallts, st11iHS, "11She611ls, seftlers, 

llfttt lepe611ls. 

"Fit1ishiflg 6flerlltiefl" mea!ls these aeWiities iii ohieh 11 

finisltiHg m11teriftl is epplietl te 11 sttbstrftte llfltt is sttbset)tlefltl) 11il' 

tlrietl; e1:11 etl in llfl 6 • eH, Br e1:11 etl b) fllttillti6fl. 

"LB" g16SS e611liflg" mellltS II eefttiflg V>itieh eiffiibi!s fl gl6SS 

re11tling less lhllfl er eqtt11I te 25 en 11 6G degree gl6ss1Heter. 

] "Metallic/Iridescent color coating" means a coating which 

contains iridescent particles, composed of either metal as metallic 

particles or silicon as mica particles, in excess of 0.042 pounds per 

gallon as applied, where such particles are visible in the dried film. 

"Multi-color[etl] coating" means a coating which exhibits 

more than one color when applied, and which is packaged in a single 

container and applied in a single coat. 

"Non[-]-(-]enclosed paint gun cleaner" means cleaner 

consisting of a basin similar to a sink in which the operator washes the 

outside of the gun under a solvent stream. The gun cup is filled with 

recirculated solvent, the gun tip is placed into a canister attached to the 

basin, and suction draws the solvent from the cup through the gun. 

The solvent gravitates to the bottom of the basin and drains through a 

small hole to a reservoir that supplies solvent to the recirculation 

pump. 

"Pretreatment coating" means a coating which contains no 

more that 16% solids, by weight, and at least 0.5% acid, by weight, is 

used to provide surface etching, and is applied directly to bare metal 

surfaces to provide corrosion resistance and promote adhesion for 

subsequent coatings. 

"Primer" means any coating which is labeled and formulated 

for application to a substrate to provide a bond between the substrate 

and subsequent coats; corrosion resistance; a smooth substrate surface; 

or resistance to penetration of subsequent coats, and on which a 

subsequent coating is applied. Primers may be pigmented. 

"Single-stage coating" means any pigmented coating, 

excluding primers and multi-color coatings, labeled and formulated for 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January OJ, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. I 
DAR File No. 36736 

application without a subsequent clear coat. Single-stage coatings 

include single-stage metallidiridescent coatings. 

"Solids" means the part of the coating that remains after the 

coating is dried or cured; solids content is determined using data from 

EPA Method 24. 

[ "Speeittley e!llltiflgs" lfteflfts !laHesillH fJl'!llft!lters, Ill" gi!lss 

e!l!ltiHgs, aright lftetttl t:r'ifl'! !'efl!IW e!llltiflgs, jllftl'3iHg (ettt iH) elel!l'e!l!lts, 

el!!St!lmefie e!llltiflgs, i!ftfJlltlt l'tlsistflftt e!llltiflgs, l!Hdeffi!ltly e!llltiHgs, 

tlftiffll'lft HHish: aleHtlet s, flfl:B .. ·eltl thl'!lttgh fJA!ftel'S. 

] "Temporary protective coating" means any coating which is 

labeled and formulated for the purpose of temporarily protecting areas 

form overspray or mechanical damage. 

"Topcoat" means any coating or series of coatings applied 

over a primer or an existing finish for the purpose of protection or 

beautification. 

"Truck bed liner coating" means any coating, excluding 

clear, color, multi-color, and single-stage coatings, labeled and 

formulated for application to a truck bed to protect it from surface 

abrasion. 

"Underbody coating" means any coating labeled and 

formulated for application to wheel wells. the inside of door panels or 

fenders, the underside of a trunk or hood, or the underside of the motor 

vehicle. 

"Uniform finish coating" means any coating labeled and 

formulated for application to the area around a spot repair for the 

purpose of blending a repaired area's color or clear coat to match the 

appearance of an adjacent area's existing coating. Prior to May I, 2013, 

this coating category may be referred to as uniform finish blenders. 

"Uniform finish blender" means a coating designed to blend 

a repaired topcoat into an existing topcoat. 

R307-354-4. Emission Standards. 

Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with a VOC 

content in excess of the amounts specified in Table I or shall use an 

add-on control device as specified in R307-354-6. 

TABLE 1 

AUTOMOTIVE REFINISHING voe LIMITS 

(values in pounds of voe per gallon of coating, minus water....!!l!!. 

exempt solvent (compounds not defined as VOC), as applied) 

COATING CATEGORY voe EMISSION RA TES 

Adhesion Promoter 4.5 

Clear Coating 2.1 

Color Coating 3.5 

Multi-color Coating 5.7 

Pretreatment Coating 5.5 

Primer 2.1 

Primer Seal er 2.1 

Single-stage Coating 2.B 

Temporary Protective Coating 0.5 

Truck Bed Liner Coating 2.6 

Underbody Coating 3.6 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January OJ, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. I 

NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES 

Uniform Finish Coating 4.5 

Any Other Coating Type 2.1 

R307-354-5. Work Practice and Recordkeeping. 

(I) Control techniques and work practices are to be 

implemented at all times to reduce voe emissions from fugitive type 

sources. Control techniques and work practices include: 

(a) Tight fitting covers for open tanks; 

(b) Covered containers for solvent wiping cloths; 

(c) Collection hoods for areas where solvent is used for 

cleanup; 

(d) Minimizing spill ofVOC-containing cleaning materials; 

(e) Conveying VOC-containing materials from one location 

to another in closed containers or pipes;J!llii 

( f) Cleaning spray guns in enclosed systems or a nonenclosed paint gun cleaner may be used if the vapor pressure of the 

cleaning solvent is less than 100 mm Hg at 68 degrees Fahrenheit and 

the solvent is directed towards a drain that leads directly to an enclosed 

remote reservoirj~ 

(g) UsiHg ree)eled s!lheHts fer e!eMiflg. 

(2) The !lWHer !lr !lflerllt!lr sk!!!I lfttHHttHH ree!lrtls lfelft lhe 

lftflftttfitetttrer !h!lt tlelftllHStrllte e!llftfJli11Hee ,;itk !he emissillH stl!Hd!ll't!s 

!lfR3!:l7 3:S4 4.] 

([3]2) Application equipment requirements: 

(a) A person shall not apply any coating to an automotive 

part or component unless the coating application method achieves a 

demonstrated 65% transfer efficiency. 

(b) The following coating application methods have been 

demonstrated to achieve a minimum of 65% transfer efficiency: 

(i) Brush, dip or roll coating operated in accordance with the 

manufacturers specifications; 

(ii) Electrostatic application equipment operated in 

accordance with the manufacturers specifications; and 

(iii) High Volume. Low Pressure spray equipment operated 

in accordance with the manufacturers specifications. 

(c) Other coating application methods may be used that 

have been demonstrated to be capable of achieving at least 65% 

transfer efficiency, as certified by the manufacturer. 

(3) All sources subiect to R307-354 shall maintain records 

demonstrating compliance with all provisions of R307-354 on an 

annual basis. 

(al Records shall include. but not be limited to. inventory 

and product data sheets of all coatings and solvents subject to R307-

lli, 

(bl These records shall be available to the director upon 

R307-354-6. Optional Add-On Controls. 

(I) The owner or operator may install and maintain an 

incinerator, carbon adsorption, or any other add-on emission control 

device, provided that the emission control device will attain at least 

90% efficiency performance. 

(2) The owner or operator of a control device shall provide 

[eertiHellti!lH tt!llft lhe mltHttf!letttrer]docwnentation that the emission 

control system will attain the requirements of R307-354-6[retttffretieilieieHey perferlftl!Hee]. 

(3) Emission control systems shall be operated and 

maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. 

81 
NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES 

The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum of two years 

records of operating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that the 

equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the 

manufacturer recommendations. 

R307-354-7. Compliance Schedule. 

All sources within Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, 

Tooele, Utah, and Weber counties shall be in compliance with this rule 

by [Jflfltlft1' l,]h!Jti. 2014. 

KEY: air pollution, automotive refinishing, VOC, coatings 

Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: (*H).20.U 

Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(l)(a) 

Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

R307-355 

Co trol of Emissions from Aerosp ce 

Ma ufacture and Rework Facir 1es 

E OF CHANGE IN PROPOSED 

DAR FILE NO.: 36737 

FILED: 12/10/2012 

RULE ANALYSIS 

PURPOSE OF E RULE OR RE 

CHANGE: During t public comment eriod, both industry 

and EPA submitted c mments that re ulted in the need to 

make substantive chan s. These co ments were regarding 

changing the rule appli bility to b in line with the CTG; 

including certain exemptio s that w. re included in the model 

rule; adding a voe con nt r it for solvent cleaning; 

changing the add-on control ffi ency to be in line with what 

is in the CTG; more clearly ming the acceptable solvent 

application methods; adding re definitions to clarify rule 

requirements; and ch gi the record-keeping 

requirements. 

SUMMARY OF The rule 

applicability in Section 307-355-2 h been changed from 

sources with the pote 1al to emit 5 tons er year of VOCs to 

sources with the pot tial to emit 10 ton per year of voes. 

The rule has been anged in Section R3 -355-3 by adding 

rule exemptions o manufacturing or re ork operations 

involving space v hicles and to rework opera ·ons performed 

on antique aero ace vehicles or components. efinitions for 

"antique aeros ace vehicle or component," "ch ical milling 

maskants," xempt solvents," "general aviat1 n rework 

facility," "lo vapor pressure hydrocarbon-base cleaning 

solvent,"" ace vehicle," and "specialty coating" are dded to 

Section 07-355-4. New emission standards are a ded in 

Section 307-355-5 for coatings that are delivered to a 

coatin applicator that applies Type I chemical m ling 

mask nt and Type II maskants. Language is also adde to 

Sec· n R307-355-5 to clarify that exempt solvents are n t 

inc ded in the voe content limits for the the coatings used. 

82 

DAR File No. 36736 

New application methods are added to Section R307-355 . 

ection R307-355-7 is changed to require owners nd 

o erators to maintain records demonstrating compliance ith 

th rule on an annual basis and to require them to ake 

tho e records available to the director upon request. veral 

solv nt cleaning exemptions are added to Section R3 -355-

8. S ion R307-355-9 is changed to clarify that the 

operat r must provide documentation that the m1ss1on 

control ystem will meet the requirements of Se on R307-

355-9. AR NOTE: This change in proposed rul has been 

filed to m ke additional changes to a proposed w rule that 

was publis ed in the October 1, 2012, issue oft e Utah State 

Bulletin, on age 91. Underlining in the rule b low indicates 

text that h been added since the pub cation of the 

proposed rul mentioned above; strike-out i icates text that 

has been del ed. You must view the ch ge in proposed 

rule and the pr osed new rule together t understand all of 

the changes tha will be enforceable shoul the agency make 

this rule effective. 

STATUTORY OR C NSTITUTIONAL 

THIS RULE: Subse ion 19-2-104(1)( 

COMPLIANCE CO TS FOR AFFECT D PERSONS: The 

compliance costs or affected persons "ll be reduced as 

there were sever I exemptions added to he proposed rule. 

However, these savings are difficult to etermine as the 

exemptions do ot apply to all sources. 

COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT H 

FISCAL IMP CT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON 

The compli nee costs for affected persons will b reduced as 

there wer several exemptions added to the pr osed rule. 

However, these savings are difficult to determ e as the 

exempti s do not apply to all sources. 

LL TEXT OF THIS RULE MAY BE INSP 

G REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS, AT: 

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

AIR QUALITY 

FOURTH FLOOR 

195 N 1950 W 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, January OJ, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. I 
UTAH STATE 

BULLETIN 

OFFICIAL NOTICES OF UTAH STATE GOVERNMENT 

Filed January 16, 2013, 12:00 a.m. through February OJ, 2013, 11:59 p.m. 

Number 2013-4 

February 15, 2013 

Nancy L. Lancaster, Editor 

Kenneth A. Hansen, Director 

Kimberly K. Hood, Executive Director 

The Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin) is an official noticing publication of the executive branch of 

Utah State Government. The Department of Administrative Services, Division of Administrative Rules 

produces the Bulletin under authority of Section 63G-3-402. 

Inquiries concerning the substance or applicability of an administrative rule that appears in the 

Bulletin should be addressed to the contact person for the rule. Questions about the Bulletin or the 

rulemaking process may be addressed to: Division of Administrative Rules, PO Box 141007, Salt Lake 

City, Utah 84114-1007, telephone 801-538-3764. Additional rulemaking information, and electronic 

versions of all administrative rule publications are available at: http://www.rules.utah.gov/ 

The information in this Bulletin is summarized in the Utah State Digest (Digest). The Digest is 

available by E-mail or over the Internet. Visit http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/digest.htm for 

additional information. 
Division of Administrative Rules, Salt Lake City 84114 

Unless otherwise noted, all infonnation presented in this publication is in the 

public domain and may be reproduced, reprinted, and redistributed as desired. 

Materials incorporated by reference retain the copyright asserted by their respective authors. 

Citation to the source is requested. 

Utah state bulletin. 

Semimonthly. 

I. Delegated legislation--Utah-Periodicals. 2. Administrative procedure-Utah-Periodicals. 

I. Utah. Office of Administrative Rules. 

KFU440.A 73S7 

348. 792'025-DDC 85-643197 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

SPECIAL NOTICES ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 

Health 

Health Care Financing, Coverage and Reimbursement Policy 

Notice for March 2013 Medicaid Rate Changes ........................................................................................................ 1 

EXECUTIVE DOCUMENTS ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 

Governor 

Administration 

Governor's Executive Order E0/001/2013: Declaring A Liquid Petroleum Emergency ............................................ 3 

NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES ................................................................................................................................................. 5 

Agriculture and Food 

Animal Industry 

No. 37248 (Repeal and Reenact): R58-6 Poultry ...................................................................................................... 6 

No. 37246 (Amendment): R58-18 Elk Farming ........................................................................................................ 12 

No. 37247 (Amendment): R58-19 Compliance Procedures ..................................................................................... 13 

Governor 

Economic Development 

No. 37208 (Amendment): R357-6 Technology and Life Science Economic Development 

and Related Tax Credits ......................................................................................................................................... 15 

No. 37207 (Amendment): R357-9 Alternative Energy Development Tax lncentives ................................................ 16 

Health 

Family Health and Preparedness, Licensing 

No. 37209 (Amendment): R432-3 General Health Care Facility Rules Inspection and 

Enforcement. .......................................................................................................................................................... 17 

Human Services 

Aging and Adult Services 

No. 37228 (Amendment): R510-104-11 Liquid Meals .............................................................................................. 18 

Recovery Services 

No. 37229 (Amendment): R5i27-38 Unenforceable Cases ...................................................................................... 20 

Services for People with Disabilities 

No. 37245 (Amendment): R539-1-3 Definitions ....................................................................................................... 21 

Natural Resources 

Parks and Recreation 

No. 37242 (Amendment): R651-224 Towed Devices ............................................................................................... 22 

Wildlife Resources 

No. 37225 (Amendment): R657-12 Hunting and Fishing Accommodations for People 

with Disabilities ....................................................................................................................................................... 24 

No. 37233 (Amendment): R657-20 Falconry ........................................................................................................... 26 

Public Safety 

Criminal Investigations and Technical Services, Criminal Identification 

No. 37232 (New Rule): R722-360 Certificate of Removal from the Sex Offender and Kidnap 

Offender Registry ................................................................................................................................................... 46 

Workforce Services 

Unemployment Insurance 

No. 37238 (Amendment): R994-406-301 Claimant Fault.. ...................................................................................... .48 

FIVE-YEAR NOTICES OF REVIEW AND STATEMENTS OF CONTINUATION ........................................................................... 51 

Environmental Quality 

Water Quality 

No. 37239: R317-9Administrative Procedures ........................................................................................................ 51 

No. 37240: R317-13 Approvals and Permits for a Water Reuse Project... ............................................................... 51 

No. 37241: R317-14 Approval in Change in Point of Discharge of POTW .............................................................. 52 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, February 15, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. 4 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Health 

Health Care Financing, Coverage and Reimbursement Policy 

No. 37221: R414-301 Medicaid General Provisions ................................................................................................ 52 

No. 37215: R414-302 Eligibility Requirements ........................................................................................................ 53 

No. 37216: R414-303 Coverage Groups ................................................................................................................. 53 

No. 37217: R414-304 Income and Budgeting .......................................................................................................... 54 

No. 37222: R414-305 Resources ............................................................................................................................. 54 

No. 37218: R414-306 Program Benefits and Date of Eligibility ............................................................................... 55 

No. 37223: R414-308 Application, Eligibility Determinations and Improper Medical 

Assistance .............................................................................................................................................................. 55 

Human Services 

Substance Abuse and Mental Health, State Hospital 

No. 37211: R525-2 Patient Rights ............................................................................................................................ 56 

No. 37224: R525-3 Medication Treatment of Patients ............................................................................................. 56 

No. 37210: R525-4 Visitors ...................................................................................................................................... 57 

No. 37214: R525-5 Background Checks .................................................................................................................. 57 

No. 37212: R525-6 Prohibited Items and Devices ................................................................................................... 58 

No. 37213: R525-7 Complaints/Suggestions/Concerns ........................................................................................... 58 

Recovery Services 

No. 37231: R527-302 Income Withholding Fees ..................................................................................................... 59 

Natural Resources 

Administration 

No. 37219: R634-1 Americans With Disabilities Complaint Procedure .................................................................... 59 

Professional Practices Advisory Commission 

Administration 

No. 37243: R686-100 Professional Practices Advisory Commission, Rules of Procedure: 

Complaints and Hearings ....................................................................................................................................... 60 

Public Safety 

Criminal Investigations and Technical Services, Criminal Identification 

No. 37226: R722-320 Undercover Identification ...................................................................................................... 61 

NOTICES FIVE-YEAR REVIEW EXTENSION ............................................................................................................................... 63 

Governor 

Economic Development 

No. 37206: R357-2 Rural Broadband Service Fund ................................................................................................ 63 

NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES ..................................................................................................................................... 65 

RULES INDEX 

BY AGENCY (CODE NUMBER) 

AND 

BY KEYWORD (SUBJECT) ........................................................................................................................................................... 69 

ii UTAH STATE BULLETIN, February 15, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. 4 
NOTICES OF 

RULE EFFECTIVE DATES 

State law provides for agencies to make their rules effective and enforceable after publication in the Utah State 

Bulletin. In the case of Proposed Rules or Changes in Proposed Rules with a designated comment period, the law 

permits an agency to file a notice of effective date any time after the close of comment plus seven days. In the case 

of Changes in Proposed Rules with no designated comment period, the law permits an agency to file a notice of 

effective date on any date including or after the thirtieth day after the rule's publication date. If an agency fails to file 

a Notice of Effective Date within 120 days from the publication of a Proposed Rule or a related Change in Proposed 

Rule the rule lapses and the agency must start the rulemaking process over. 

Notices of Effective Date are governed by Subsection 63G-3-301 (12), 63G-3-303, and Sections R15-4-Sa and Sb. 

Abbreviations 

AMO= Amendment 

CPR = Change in Proposed Rule 

NEW= New Rule 

R&R = Repeal & Reenact 

REP= Repeal 

Agriculture and Food 

Regulatory Services 

No. 37027 (AMO): R70-310. Grade A Pasteurized Milk 

Published: 12/01 /2012 

Effective: 01 /29/2013 

No. 36915 (AMO): R70-320-18. Transport Tanks, Operators 

Published: 11/01/2012 

Effective: 01 /29/2013 

No. 36914 (AMO): R70-330. Raw Milk for Retail 

Published 11/01/2012 

Effective: 01/29/2013 

Commerce 

Occupational and Professional Licensing 

No. 37073 (AMO): R156-3a-102. Definitions 

Published: 12/15/2012 

Effective: 01/24/2013 

No. 37074 (AMO): R156-22. Professional Engineers and 

Professional Land Surveyors Licensing Act Rule 

Published: 12/15/2012 

Effective: 01 /24/2013 

No. 37071 (AMO): R 156-44a. Nurse Midwife Practice Act 

Rules 

Published: 12/15/2012 

Effective: 01/22/2013 

Environmental Quality 

Administration 

No. 36554 (REP): R305-6. Administrative Procedures 

Published: 08/15/2012 

Effective: 01 /31/2013 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, February 15, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. 4 

No. 36554 (CPR): R305-6. Administrative Procedures 

Published: 01 /01 /2013 

Effective: 01/31/2013 

No. 36553 (NEW): R305-7. Administrative Procedures 

Published: 08/15/2012 

Effective: 01/31/2013 

No. 36553 (CPR): R305-7. Administrative Procedures 

Published: 01/01/2013 

Effective: 01/31/2013 

Air Quality 

No. 36723 (AMO): R307-101-2. Definitions 

Published: 10/01/2012 

Effective: 02/01/2013 

No. 36723 (CPR): R307-101-2. Definitions 

Published: 01 /01/2013 

Effective: 02/01 /2013 

No. 36741 (AMO): R307-307. Davis, Salt Lake, and Utah 

Counties: Road Salting and Sanding 

Published: 10/01/2012 

Effective: 02/01/2013 

No. 36741 (CPR): R307-307. Davis, Salt Lake, and Utah 

Counties: Road Salting and Sanding 

Published: 01 /01 /2013 

Effective: 02/01 /2013 

No. 36740 (NEW): R307-312. Aggregate Processing 

Operations for PM2.5 Non attainment Areas 

Published: 10/01/2012 

Effective: 02/01 /2013 

No. 36740 (CPR): R307-312. Aggregate Processing 

Operations for PM2.5 Nonattainment Areas 

Published: 01 /01 /2013 

Effective: 02/01/2013 

No. 36725 (REP): R307-340. Ozone Nonattainment and 

Maintenance Areas: Surface Coating Processes 

Published: 10/01/2012 

Effective: 02/01 /2013 

65 
NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES 

No. 36725 (CPR): R307-340. Ozone Nonattainment and 

Maintenance Areas: Surface Coating Processes 

Published: 01/01/2013 

Effective: 02/01/2013 

r--. 

No. 36726 (NEW): R307-344. Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings 

Published: 10/01/2012 

Effective: 02/01/2013 

No. 36726 (CPR): R307-344. Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings 

Published: 01 /01 /2013 

Effective: 02/01/2013 

No. 36727 (NEW): R307-345. Fabric and Vinyl Coatings 

Published: 10/0112012 

Effective: 02/0112013 

No. 36727 (CPR): R307-345. Fabric and Vinyl Coatings 

Published: 01/01/2013 

Effective: 02/01/2013 

No. 36728 (NEW): R307-346. Metal Furniture Surface 

Coatings 

Published: 10/01/2012 

Effective: 02/01/2013 

No. 36728 (CPR): R307-346. Metal Furniture Surface 

Coatings 

Published: 01/01/2013 

Effective: 02/01 /2013 

No. 36729 (NEW): R307-34 7. Large Appliance Surface 

Coatings 

Published: 10/01/2012 

Effective: 02/01/2013 

No. 36729 (CPR): R307-347. Large Appliance Surface 

Coatings 

Published: 01 /01 /2013 

Effective: 02/01/2013 

No. 36730 (NEW): R307-348. Magnet Wire Coatings 

Published: 10/01 /2012 

Effective: 02/0112013 

No. 36730 (CPR): R307-348. Magnet Wire Coatings 

Published: 01/01/2013 

Effective: 02/01/2013 

No. 36731 (NEW): R307-349. Flat Wood Panel Coatings 

Published: 10/01/2012 

Effective: 02/01/2013 

No. 36731 (CPR): R307-349. Flat Wood Panel Coatings 

Published: 01/01/2013 

Effective: 02/0112013 

66 

No. 36732 (NEW): R307-350. Miscellaneous Metal Parts 

and Products Coatings 

Published: 10/01/2012 

Effective: 02/01/2013 

No. 36732 (CPR): R307-350. Miscellaneous Metal Parts and 

Products Coatings 

Published: 01 /01 /2013 

Effective: 02/01/2013 

No. 36733 (NEW): R307-351. GraphicArts 

Published: 10/01 /2012 

Effective: 02/01/2013 

No. 36733 (CPR): R307-351. GraphicArts 

Published: 01 /01 /2013 

Effective: 02/01/2013 

No. 36734 (NEW): R307-352. Metal Container, Closure, and 

Coil Coatings 

Published: 10/01/2012 

Effective: 02/01/2013 

No. 36734 (CPR): R307-352. Metal Container, Closure, and 

Coil Coatings 

Published: 01 /01 /2013 

Effective: 02/0112013 

No. 36736 (NEW): R307-354. Automotive Refinishing 

Coatings 

Published: 10/01/2012 

Effective: 02/0112013 

No. 36736 (CPR): R307-354. Automotive Refinishing 

Coatings 

Published: 01/01/2013 

Effective: 02/01/2013 

No. 36737 (NEW): R307-355. Control of Emissions from 

Aerospace Manufacture and Rework Facilities 

Published: 10/0112012 

Effective: 02/01/2013 

No. 36737 (CPR): R307-355. Control of Emissions from 

Aerospace Manufacture and Rework Facilities 

Published: 01/01/2013 

Effective: 02/01/2013 

Drinking Water 

No. 36562 (AMO): R309-515-6. Ground Water - Wells 

Published: 08/15/2012 

Effective: 01 /16/2013 

No. 36562 (CPR): R309-515-6. Ground Water - Wells 

Published: 12/01/2012 

Effective: 01 /16/2013 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, February 15, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. 4 
Insurance 

Administration 

No. 37018 (AMO): R590-102. Insurance Department Fee 

Payment Rule 

Published: 11/15/2012 

Effective: 01/18/2013 

No. 36846 (AMO): R590-171. Surplus Lines Procedures 

Rule 

Published: 10/15/2012 

Effective: 01/22/2013 

No. 36846 (CPR): R590-171. Surplus Lines Procedures 

Rule 

Published: 12/15/2012 

Effective: 01 /22/2013 

NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES 

Natural Resources 

Oil, Gas and Mining; Oil and Gas 

No. 36992 (AMO): R649-3-38. Surface Owner Protection Act 

Provisions 

Published: 11/15/2012 

Effective: 01/23/2013 

Wildlife Resources 

No. 37069 (AMO): R657-13. Taking Fish and Crayfish 

Published: 12/15/2012 

Effective: 01 /22/2013 

End of the Notices of Rule Effective Dates Section 

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, February 15, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. 4 67