alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 68 

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2019 

Mr. GREEN of Tennessee submitted the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution 

of the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 68 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Total expenditures for any fiscal year 

3 shall not exceed total receipts for that fiscal year. Such 

4 total expenditures do not include those for repayment of 

5 debt principal and such total receipts may not include 

6 those derived from borrowing. 

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. For a national emergency, two-thirds of 

8 each House of Congress may for limited times authorize 

9 expenditures exceeding those pursuant to rules established 

10 under section 1. Debts incurred from such expenditures 

11 shall be paid as soon as practicable. 

12 ‘‘SECTION 3. Before each fiscal year, the President 

13 shall transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for such 

14 fiscal year for the Government in which total expenditures 

15 do not exceed total receipts. If the President fails to per16 form the duty imposed by this section, any executive ac17 tions may be unilaterally overturned by a simple majority 

18 vote of each House of Congress until the date on which 

19 the President submits the proposed budget to Congress. 

20 ‘‘SECTION 4. The limit on the debt of the United 

21 States held by the public shall not be increased unless two22 thirds of each House of Congress provides by law for such 

23 an increase by a roll-call vote. 

24 ‘‘SECTION 5. For purposes of section 2, a national 

25 emergency occurs whenever a declaration of war is in efVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:24 Jun 21, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ68.IH HJ68

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HJ 68 IH 

1 fect or whenever Congress adopts a concurrent resolution 

2 declaring a national emergency. 

3 ‘‘SECTION 6. Congress shall have power to enforce 

4 this article by appropriate legislation. 

5 ‘‘SECTION 7. This article shall take effect beginning 

6 with the tenth fiscal year after its ratification.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief FinancialOfficer of CommunitySouth Financial Corporation (the “Company”), each certifythat, to his knowledge on the date of this certification:

 

1.     Thequarterly report of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2008 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | August 14, 2008 | By:                           | /s/ C. Allan Ducker, III |
|--------|----------------------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|   |                 | C. Allan Ducker, III     |
|   |                 | Chief Executive Officer       |
|   |                 | (Principal Executive Officer) |
|   |                 |                          |
| Date:  | August 14, 2008 | By:                           | /s/ John W. Hobbs             |
|   |                 | John W. Hobbs                 |
|   |                 | Chief Financial Officer       |
|   |                 | (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
REVISED 10/11/2000

AGENDA

PUBL

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY

C WORKSHOP ON A RULEMAKING TO CONSIDER ENERGY EFFICIENCY

STANDARDS

FOR DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS

PLACE OF WORKSHOP:

DATE AND TIME:

PURPOSE OF THE WORKSHOP

FORRESTAL BUILDING

1000 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, SW

ROOM 1E-245

WASHINGTON, DC 20585

TELEPHONE: 202-586-9127

TELEFAX: 202-256-4617

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2000

9:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M.

The purpose of this public workshop is to hear the views of interested persons on the

issues and process involved in a rulemaking to consider energy efficiency standards

for distribution transformers. The Department will consider the views presented

and comments submitted in formulating its approach in the rulemaking.

1. OPENING REMARKS AND INTRODUCTIONS

If. AGENDA REVIEW

Ill. DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS - TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION (Estimated

Time for Presentation and Discussion)

A. Introduction (:30)

B. Market and Technology Assessment (1:30)

1. Product Class

2. Characterization of Baseline Distribution Transformers

C. Screening Analysis (:30)

 EE-RM/STD-00-550 COMMENT 01B
Engineering Analysis (1:30)

1. Engineering Analysis Approaches

2. Retail Prices and Markups

3. Transformer Design Loads and Operational Loading

E. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (:15)

F. Consumer Sub-group Analysis (:15)

G. National Energy Saving and Net Present Value Analysis (:15)

H. Manufacturer Impact Analysis (1:00)

1. Utility Impact Analysis (:15)

J. Environmental Analysis (:15)

Net National Employment Impact (:15)

IV. ADJOURNMENT

 EE-RM/STD-00-550 COMMENT 01B
**Exhibit 32.1**
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of ZAGG Incorporated (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert G. Pedersen II,
        Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss..1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15
        (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 **/s/****ROBERT
                  G. PEDERSEN II******Robert
                  G. Pedersen IIChief
                  Executive OfficerMay
                  15, 2008
Dismissed and Opinion Filed June 15, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00017-CV 

JAMES DAVID HORTON AND ROBBIE LESA HORTON, Appellants 

V. 

BROOKE DAVES, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-11551 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Bridges, Lang and Schenck 

Opinion by Justice Bridges 

James David Horton and Robbie Lesa Horton appeal the trial court’s order granting 

Brooke Daves’s motion to dismiss the claims against her pursuant to Chapter 27 of the Texas 

Civil Practice and Remedies Code, which is known as the Texas Citizens Participation Act 

(TCPA). The Hortons argue this Court has jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal. We 

conclude that we do not have jurisdiction and dismiss this interlocutory appeal. The law is wellsettled in this matter, therefore we issue this memorandum opinion. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 47.1. 

This appeal involves the same facts and legal arguments as Horton v. Martin, No. 05-15-

00015-CV. The appeals have the same reporter’s record and any differences in the clerk’s 

records are not material to our resolution of the appeals. We issued today a full opinion in 

Horton v. Martin, No. 05-15-00015-CV, addressing all jurisdictional arguments raised by the 
 –2– 

Hortons, Martin, Stovall, and Daves. For the reasons explained in that case, we conclude this 

Court does not have jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal. The appeal is dismissed for want 

of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). 

150017F.P05 

 

/David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

JAMES DAVID HORTON AND ROBBIE 

LESA HORTON, Appellants 

No. 05-15-00017-CV V. 

SUSAN MCMILLION MARTIN, 

SHANNON PRITCHARD, BROOKE 

DAVES AND KIMBERLY STOVALL, 

Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-11551. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. 

Justices Lang and Schenck participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED for want 

of jurisdiction. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee BROOKE DAVES recover her costs of this appeal from 

appellants JAMES DAVID HORTON AND ROBBIE LESA HORTON. 

Judgment entered June 15, 2015.
Notice of Appeal Page 1 

W:\Carrollton\Hamrla\Appeal\Notice of Appeal.docx 

CAUSE NO. 2012-70581-431 

MILAN HAMRLA, PETRA § IN THE DISTRICT COURT 

CHAUDEJOVA, MICHAEL and § 

LAURA BREWER, DALIA CHAVARRIA, § 

DIANE and GENE HINES and § 

KEITH EFFERT, § 

 § 

 Plaintiffs, § DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS 

 § 

v. § 

 § 

CITY OF CARROLLTON, TEXAS, § 

 § 

 Defendant. § 442nd JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

NOTICE OF APPEAL

TO THE HONORABLE DISTRICT JUDGE AND JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS: 

 The City of Carrollton, Texas (the City), defendant in the above-referenced action, desires 

to appeal the order denying Defendant’s Plea to the Jurisdiction signed by the district court in the 

on March 17, 2015. The City gives notice of its intent and desire to appeal the order to the Second 

Court of Appeals in Fort Worth. The appeal is an interlocutory, accelerated appeal filed pursuant 

to Section 51.014(a)(8) of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code. Note: This case was 

transferred to the 442nd District Court from the 431st District Court on February 2, 2015, but 

Judge Bailey ruled on the plea after the transfer, presumably under Section 24.003(b) of the Texas 

Government Code. 

FILED: 4/6/2015 8:01:00 AM

SHERRI ADELSTEIN

Denton County District Clerk

By: Joanna Price, Deputy

ACCEPTED

02-15-00119-CV

SECOND COURT OF APPEALS

FORT WORTH, TEXAS

4/8/2015 10:43:26 AM

DEBRA SPISAK

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 2nd COURT OF APPEALS FORT WORTH, TEXAS 04/08/2015 10:43:26 AM DEBRA SPISAK Clerk
Notice of Appeal Page 2 

W:\Carrollton\Hamrla\Appeal\Notice of Appeal.docx 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ Fredrick “Fritz” Quast 

 Fredrick “Fritz” Quast 

 Texas Bar No. 24032974 

 fquast@toase.com 

 George A. Staples 

 Texas Bar No. 19058000 

 gstaples@toase.com 

 Taylor, Olson, Adkins, Sralla, 

 & Elam, L.L.P. 

 6000 Western Place, Suite 200 

 Fort Worth, Texas 76107-4654 

 Telephone: (817) 332-2580 

 Facsimile: (817)332-4740 

 Meredith A. Ladd 

 Texas Bar No. 24003368 

Meredith.Ladd@cityofcarrollton.com

City Attorney for City of Carrollton 

 R. Clayton Hutchins 

 Texas Bar No. 10344000 

 Clayton.Hutchins@cityofcarrollton.com

1945 E. Jackson Road 

 Carrollton, Texas 75006 

 Telephone: (972) 466-3046 

 Facsimile: (972) 446-3542 

 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT, 

 CITY OF CARROLLTON, TEXAS 

 
Notice of Appeal Page 3 

W:\Carrollton\Hamrla\Appeal\Notice of Appeal.docx 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 A true and correct copy of the above and foregoing Notice of Appeal has been forwarded 

via the electronic filing manager and email to the following counsel of record for Plaintiffs in 

accordance with Rule 21a the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure on this April 4, 2015: 

Mr. Bruce Turner 

bet@bennettweston.com 

Mr. J. Michael Weston 

jmweston@bennettweston.com 

Bennett, Weston, LaJone & Turner, P.C. 

1603 L.B.J. Freeway, Suite 280 

Dallas, Texas 75234 

 /s/ Fredrick “Fritz” Quast 

 Fredrick “Fritz” Quast
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

February 25, 2011

Ms. Kay E. Ellington

Law Offices of Kay Ellington, P.C.

211 N. Record, Suite 550 LB 12

Dallas, TX 75202

Mr. Barney L. McCoy

815 Hawthorne

Houston, TX 77006

RE:Case Number:  08-0667

Court of Appeals Number:  10-07-00305-CV

Trial Court Number:  C200700032

Style:EBERHARD SAMLOWSKI, M.D.

v.

CAROL WOOTEN

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued opinions in the above-referenced cause.  You may obtain a copy of the opinions at: http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/recent.asp.  If you would like the opinion by email, please contact Claudia Jenks at claudia.jenks@txcourts.gov or call (512)463-1312 ext. 41367.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosure

**Case No. 08-0667Page 1**
CAUSE NO. 2010-25688 

LINDA GREEN, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF

 Plaintiff §

 §

v. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS 

 § 

ZURICH AMERICAN, §

INSURANCE CO., §

 Defendant. § 133RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

DEFENDANT TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCEDIVISION OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION’S 

AMENDED NOTICE OF ACCELERATED APPEAL

Defendant, Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation 

(“TDI-DWC”), hereby gives notice of its desire to appeal the Order, which denied 

Defendant TDI-DWC’s Plea to the Jurisdiction, signed by the Court on March 2, 2015. 

This accelerated interlocutory appeal is taken pursuant to Texas Civil Practice and 

Remedies Code § 51.014(a)(8). TDI-DWC filed its original Notice of Accelerated Appeal 

on March 23, 2015. 

The Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation appeals 

to the First Court of Appeals. This case has previously been in the First Court of Appeals 

in Petition for Writ of Mandamus styled In re Zurich American Insurance Company, Case 

No. 01-12-01094. 

Dated: April 9, 2015 

ACCEPTED

01-15-00321-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/9/2015 2:25:30 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/9/2015 2:25:30 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
2

Respectfully submitted,

KEN PAXTON

Attorney General of Texas

CHARLES E. ROY

First Assistant Attorney General

JAMES E. DAVIS

Deputy Attorney General for Civil Litigation

DAVID A. TALBOT, JR.

Division Chief, Administrative Law Division

/s/Dennis M. McKinney 

DENNIS M. McKINNEY

State Bar No.13719300

Assistant Attorney General

Administrative Law Division

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station

Austin, Texas 78711-2548

Telephone: (512) 475-4020

Facsimile: (512) 320-0167

Dennis.McKinney@texasattorneygeneral.gov

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, 

DIVISION OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION 
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and forgoing document has 

been served to the following on the 9th day of April, 2015 to the following parties:

Brad McClellan Via E-Service

LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD PENA, P.C.

1701 Directors Blvd, Suite 110

Austin, Texas 78744

brad.mcclellan@yahoo.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

David Brenner Via E-Service

Belinda May Arambula

BURNS ANDERSON JURY & BRENNER, L.L.P.

P.O. Box 26300

Austin, Texas 78755-6300

7804 Bell Mountain Drive, # 100

Austin, Texas 78730

dbrenner@bajb.com

barambula@bajb.com

Attorneys for Defendant Zurich American

Raymond L. Kalmans Via E-Service

Stephen L. Brochstein

Schlanger, Silver, Barg & Paine, LLP

109 North Post Oak Lane, Ste. 300

Houston, Texas 77024

rkalmans@ssbplaw.com

Attorneys for Intervenor Bessie A. Wilhelm

/s/Dennis M. McKinney 

DENNIS M. McKINNEY

Assistant Attorney General
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 321ST DISTRICT COURT OF SMITH COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 21st

day of January, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

LINDA C. TATE REDDIC, Appellant

NO. 12-14-00203-CV; Trial Court No. 12-1808-D

By per curiam opinion.

LARRY D REDDIC SR., Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, 

it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the 

appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, 

and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision be certified to 

the court below for observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 7

th day of April, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
```

Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Relationserve Media, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Adam Wasserman, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

/s/Adam Wasserman
----------------------------
Adam Wasserman
Principal Accounting Officer
November 17, 2005
```
Opinion issued March 31, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01

- 15

- 00235

- CV

——————————— IN RE iWORKS PERSONNEL, INC., LUIS TREVINO, AND HAYDEE GUTIERREZ , Relator s

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Man damus

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

In th is original proceeding, R elators iWorks Personnel, Inc., Luis Trevino,
and Haydee Gutierrez seek mandamus relief f rom the trial court’s February 20
,
2015 Order denying iWorks Personnel, Inc.’s Plea to the Jurisdiction. Th e petition

1 The underlying case is Mose A. Guillory and Mary Guillory v. iWorks Personnel, Inc., Luis Trevino, and Haydee Gutierrez , Cause No. 2012

- 61407 , in the 113th Jud icial District Court of Harris Co unty

.2

for writ of mandamus is DENIED

. All pending motions are DENIED AS

MOOT

.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 November 9, 2006
    /s/ Matthew J. AssiffMatthew J. AssiffSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 68 (Monday, April 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21142-21143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8487]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

STATE DEPARTMENT

[Public Notice 7815]

International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) Meeting Notice; 
Closed Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App Sec.  10(a)(2), the Department of State 
announces a meeting of the International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) 
to take place on May 24, 2012, at the Department of State, Washington, 
DC
    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 
U.S.C. App Sec.  10(d), and 5 U.S.C. 552B(c)(1), it has been determined 
that

[[Page 21143]]

this Board meeting will be closed to the public because the Board will 
be reviewing and discussing matters properly classified in accordance 
with Executive Order 13526. The purpose of the ISAB is to provide the 
Department with a continuing source of independent advice on all 
aspects of arms control, disarmament, political-military affairs, 
international security and related aspects of public diplomacy. The 
agenda for this meeting will include classified discussions related to 
the Board's ongoing studies on current U.S. policy and issues regarding 
arms control, international security, nuclear proliferation, and 
diplomacy.
    For more information, contact Richard W. Hartman II, Executive 
Director of the International Security Advisory Board, Department of 
State, Washington, DC 20520, telephone: (202) 736-4290.

    Dated: March 28, 2012.
Richard W. Hartman II,
Executive Director, International Security Advisory Board, U.S. 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-8487 Filed 4-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-27-P
```
FILE COPY

/J-l¿- t1/- k/

IN THE SUPRI,ME COURT OF TEXAS

NO. 14-0s78 

$

ToNYGARcTÄ s

t. $ Hidalgo CountY'

HERALDo ESCoBAR 3 r3rh Disrrict.

$

February 27, 2015

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

**********

I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

fhat the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, TONY GARCIA, pay all costs ìncurred on this

petition.

'WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 9th day of April,2Ùlí.

E\*-0---. [ . Fl.r.r+-...-__

Blake A. Hawthome, Clerk

By Monica Zananipa, Deputy Clerk