alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit31.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I,Dianne M. Scheu, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer ofCellu Tissue Holdings, Inc., certify that:

1.               I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cellu Tissue Holdings, Inc.  for the period ended August 24, 2006;

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b)          Evaluatedthe effectiveness****of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)           Disclosedin this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has material affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

(a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, andreport financial information; and

 

----

(b)         Any fraud**,** whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  October 10, 2006

|   | /s/  DIANNE M. SCHEU               |
|--------|------------------------------------|
|   | Dianne M. Scheu                    |
|   | Senior Vice President, Finance and |
|   | Chief Financial Officer            |

 

2

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**SENECA GAMING CORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE OFFICERS**

** **

(Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Seneca Gaming Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission, we, John Pasqualoni, InterimPresident and Chief Executive Officer, and Joseph A. D’Amato, Senior VicePresident, Finance and Administration, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.             The Quarterly Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,; and

 

2.             The information contained in the QuarterlyReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operation of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented inthe Form 10-Q.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.

 

 

May 9, 2005

 
| /s/  John Pasqualoni                                                         |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| John  Pasqualoni                                                             |
| Interim  President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |

 
| /s/  Joseph A. D’Amato                                                      |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Joseph A. D’Amato                                                           |
| Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration (Principal  Financial Officer) |

 

The forgoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Qpursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not beingfiled as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
#### T. S. ALPHIN and Alphin Aircraft, Inc., Appellants, v. Richard HENSON et al., Appellees.

No. 75-1635.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued Dec. 4, 1975.

Decided May 17, 1976.

Carl W. Schwarz, Washington, D. C. (Metzger, Noble, Schwarz & Kempler; Robert M. Beckman, Frank Kingston Smith, Beckman & Smith, Washington, D. C., on brief), for appellants.

George J. Goldsborough, Jr., Easton, Md., and (Broughton M. Earnest, Easton, Md., on brief), for appellees Richard Henson and Henson Aviation, Inc.

*86(Robert E. Kuczynski, Daniel W. Moylan and William P. Nairn, Hagerstown, Md., on brief), for appellee The City of Hagerstown.

Before WINTER, Circuit Judge, FIELD, Senior Circuit Judge, and MERHIGE, District Judge.*

*

 Honorable Robert R. Merhige, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

T. S. Alphin and Alphin Aircraft, Inc., instituted this action against Richard Henson and Henson Aviation, Inc., together with the City of Hagerstown, Maryland, charging the defendants with violations of Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2. The plaintiffs sought damages as well as injunctive relief.

The district court found that Henson had attempted to monopolize and granted injunctive relief under Section 16 of the Clayton Act,1 but concluded that the plaintiffs had failed to prove that they had suffered any injury as a result of Henson’s conduct and declined to award damages under Section 4 of the Act.2 The court granted the plaintiffs’ prayer for costs but refused their request for attorneys’ fees, and the sole issue raised on this appeal is the denial of such fees.

We agree with the district judge that attorneys’ fees could not properly be awarded in this case. As stated in *Byram Concretanks, Inc. v. Warren Concrete Prod. Co. of N. J.,*374 F.2d 649, 651 (3 Cir. 1967):

> “In a long line of cases the courts have interpreted this section of the Clayton Act not to permit plaintiffs to recover attorneys’ fees unless treble damages are awarded, regardless of whether injunctive relief is granted. *Clabaugh v. Southern Wholesale Grocers Association,*181 F. 706 (C.C.Ala.1910); *Decorative Stone Co. v. Building Trades Council of Westchester County,*23 F.2d 426 (2nd Cir. 1928); *Allen Bradley Co. v. Local Union No. 3, I. B. of E. Workers,*51 F.Supp. 36 (D.C.N.Y.1943); *Alden-Rochelle, Inc. v. American Soc. of C., A. and P.,*80 F.Supp. 888 (D.C.N.Y.1948).”

The failure of the plaintiffs to prevail upon their claim for damages precluded any recovery for attorneys’ fees under Section 4, and the other theories urged upon us for the recovery of such fees are foreclosed under *Alyeska Pipeline Co. v. Wilderness Society,*421 U.S. 240, 95 S.Ct. 1612, 44 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975).

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

*AFFIRMED.*

1

. 15 U.S.C. § 26.

2

. 15 U.S.C. § 15.
Mario Saldivar, et 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 9, 2015

No. 04-15-00132-CV

Armando HERNANDEZ, Nancy Hernandez,

Appellants

v.

Mario SALDIVAR, et al,

Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-17077

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On April 2, 2015, this court notified the court reporter that the reporter=s record was late. 

The court reporter responded to our notice by stating that the reporter=s record was not filed 

because appellant failed to provide proper notice to the reporter of the appeal and failed to pay or 

make arrangements to pay the reporter=s fee for preparing the record. The court reporter also 

states appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. 

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide proof to this court within ten (10) days 

of the date of this order that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been 

made to pay the reporter=s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s 

fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due within 

thirty (30) days from the date of this order, and the court will only consider those issues or points 

raised in appellant=s brief that do not require a reporter=s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Action Industries, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, I, Stephanie Passalaqua, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  November 8, 2007 Action Industries, Inc. By:/s/ Stephanie Passalaqua Stephanie Passalaqua  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Action Industries, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, I, Inna Sheveleva, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  November 8, 2007 Action Industries, Inc. By: /s/ Inna Sheveleva Inna Sheveleva
----- Forwarded by Deke Abbott/AWA/FAA on 01/16/2014 02:08 PM -----

From: "Shah, Shefali" <SShah@erahelicopters.com>

AFS-220, Air Carrier Operations

To: Deke Abbott/AWA/FAA@FAA, 

Date: 01/15/2014 08:29 PM

Subject: Era Helicopters, LLC Petition for Exemption, Docket No. FAA 2011-1084

BY ELECTRONIC MAIL

Deke Abbott

Manager AFS-220, Air Carrier Operations

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Ave., SW, Room 830

Washington DC 20591

Dear Mr. Abbott:

I write to confirm that, in connection with its petition for exemption from SFAR 77, Docket 

No. FAA 2011-1084, Era Helicopters, LLC is not requesting any area restrictions as 

discussed on our telephone conversation of earlier today. Should you wish to discuss any 

further comments or questions with respect to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact 

me at ((917-891-1324), sshah@eragroupinc.com).

Regards,

Shefali

Shefali A. Shah

Acting General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Era Group Inc.

CityCentre Two

818 Town & Country Blvd, Ste 200

Houston, TX 77024-4564

O: 281-606-4884

M: 917-891-1324

sshah@eragroupinc.com
1 The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-2970

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of Nebraska. Dion M. Hinton, also known as * Bryon Jay Smith, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 3, 2004 Filed: June 8, 2004

___________ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Dion M. Hinton pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing cocaine base (crack), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1). The district court 1 sentenced him to 262 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. On appeal, his counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Mr. Hinton has filed a pro se supplemental brief. We affirm.-2- After careful review, we find the ineffective-assistance claims raised by counsel and Mr. Hinton are not properly before us. SeeUnited States v. Jackson , 204 F.3d 812, 815 (8th Cir. 2000). The other arguments Mr. Hinton raises are also unavailing. The convictions Mr. Hinton challenges qualify him for career-offender status regardless whether the sentences were suspended or served (and nothing in the record supports Mr. Hinton’s contention that either sentence was suspended), as the convictions are crimes of violence "punishable" by imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year. See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, comment. (n.1) ("prior felony conviction" means federal or state conviction for offense punishable by death or imprisonment for term exceeding 1 year, regardless whether such offense is specifically designated as felony and regardless of actual sentence imposed); United States v. Gonzales , 220 F.3d 922, 926 (8th Cir. 2000) (unsentenced guilty plea is prior conviction for purposes of § 4B1.1). Whether the unlawful-sexual-intercourse offense could in the future be reduced to a misdemeanor is also irrelevant for career-offender purposes. Cf. Ewing v. California , 538 U.S. 11, 28-29 (2003) (though California courts have discretion to reduce "wobbler" offense to misdemeanor, "it remains a felony for all purposes 'unless and until the trial court imposes a misdemeanor sentence.' " (citations omitted)).
Having found no nonfrivolous issues after reviewing under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent 

 v. 

HARRY BECKETT, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 46 MM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9392]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7850]


Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``African Cosmos: Stellar Arts''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the object to be 
included in the exhibition ``African Cosmos: Stellar Arts,'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of 
cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the Smithsonian 
Institution's National Museum of African Arts, Washington, DC, from on 
or about June 20, 2012, until on or about December 9, 2012, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
description of the exhibit object, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: April 11, 2012.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-9392 Filed 4-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 93 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 93

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                      regarding the right to vote.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 7, 2020

    Mr. Pocan (for himself, Ms. Barragan, Mr. Blumenauer, Ms. Blunt 
 Rochester, Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania, Mr. Cartwright, Ms. 
 Clark of Massachusetts, Mr. DeSaulnier, Mr. Garamendi, Ms. Garcia of 
Texas, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Hastings, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, 
 Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Khanna, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, Ms. Lee of California, 
  Mr. Lowenthal, Mr. McGovern, Ms. Meng, Ms. Moore, Mr. Norcross, Ms. 
  Norton, Ms. Pressley, Mr. Raskin, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mr. Rush, Ms. 
 Schakowsky, Ms. Sewell of Alabama, Mr. Takano, Ms. Tlaib, Mrs. Watson 
Coleman, Mr. Veasey, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, and Mr. Yarmuth) submitted 
the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                      regarding the right to vote.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Every citizen of the United States, who is of legal 
voting age, shall have the fundamental right to vote in any public 
election held in the jurisdiction in which the citizen resides.
    ``Section 2. Congress shall have the power to enforce and implement 
this article by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 22776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9107]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9514-9]


Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses

AGENCY:  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  This document announces the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) responses to Agency Clearance requests, in compliance with the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). An agency may not 
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a 
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB 
control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA regulations are listed 
in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Rick Westlund (202) 566-1682, or 
email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#750210060119001b115b071c161e351005145b121a03"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5b2c3e282f372e353f75293238301b3e2b3a753c342d">[email protected]</span></a> and please refer to the appropriate EPA 
Information Collection Request (ICR) Number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Responses to Agency Clearance Requests

OMB Approvals

    EPA ICR Number 1686.09; NESHAP for the Secondary Lead Smelter 
Industry; 40 CFR part 63, subparts A and X; was approved on 03/02/2012; 
OMB Number 2060-0296; expires on 03/31/2015; Approved without change.

Comment Filed

    EPA ICR Number 2452.01; NESHAP for Pulp and Paper Production; in 40 
CFR part 63 subparts A and S; OMB filed comment on 03/02/2012.
    EPA ICR Number 2457.01; NESHAP for Group IV Polymers and Resins; in 
40 CFR part 63 subparts A and JJJ; OMB filed comment on 03/02/2012.
    EPA ICR Number 1811.08; NESHAP for Polyether Polyol Production; in 
40 CFR part 63, subparts A and PPP; OMB filed comment on 03/06/2012.

Withdrawn and Continue

    EPA ICR Number 2258.02; PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS Implementation Rule 
(Renewal); Withdrawn from OMB on 03/22/2012.
    EPA ICR Number 2313.02; Ambient Ozone Monitoring Regulations: 
Revisions to Network Design Requirements (Final Rule); Withdrawn from 
OMB on 03/20/2012.

John Moses,
Director, Collections Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-9107 Filed 4-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>