alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 498

Honoring the United States Marines killed in action during World War 

II while participating in the 1942 raid on Makin Atoll in the Gilbert 

Islands and expressing the sense of Congress that a site in Arlington 

National Cemetery near the Space Shuttle Challenger Memorial at the 

corner of Memorial and Farragut Drives should be provided for the 

remains of those Marines. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 3, 2002

Mr. BRYANT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Honoring the United States Marines killed in action during 

World War II while participating in the 1942 raid on 

Makin Atoll in the Gilbert Islands and expressing the 

sense of Congress that a site in Arlington National Cemetery near the Space Shuttle Challenger Memorial at 

the corner of Memorial and Farragut Drives should be 

provided for the remains of those Marines.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That Congress—
2

•HCON 498 IH 

1 (1) remembers with profound sorrow, gratitude, 

2 and respect the United States Marines who were 

3 killed in action during World War II while partici4 pating in a combat raid on Japanese forces on 

5 Makin Atoll in the Gilbert Islands in August, 1942, 

6 and whose remains were recovered from Makin Atoll 

7 in 1999; and 

8 (2) hopes with firm prayers for the recovery of 

9 the remains of the 9 United States Marines engaged 

10 in that raid who, after surrendering in accordance 

11 with the law of armed conflict, were summarily be12 headed by their captors on Kwajalein Atoll. 

13 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

14 It is the sense of Congress that—

15 (1) the United States Marines killed in action 

16 or beheaded in captivity on Makin and Kwajalien 

17 Atolls during World War II, as described in the first 

18 section of this resolution, gave hope to the world by 

19 offering up their lives; and 

20 (2) a place of honor in Arlington National Cem21 etery near the Space Shuttle Challenger Memorial at 

22 the corner of Memorial and Farragut Drives should 

23 be provided for the remains of those Marines both 

24 as a reminder of United States resolve during the 

25 dark, early days of World War II, and as a reminder 
3

•HCON 498 IH 

1 that the heroism and dedication of those Marines 

2 represents the sacrifices that all members of the 

3 United States Armed Forces stand ready to make 

4 when the security of the United States is threatened.

Æ
AMS-MO Program Message Sets

SCENARIO CONDITIONS USE MSG

CASE 1: Request 

Inspection by 

AMS After Entry

Fresh or processed fruit, vegetable, or specialty crop 

product other than pistachios, subject to marketing order 

quality requirements that is intended for sale to 

consumers and not previously inspected for compliance; 

importer requests that AMS inspect the product after 

entry.

AMS-MO1

CASE 2: Request 

Admittance Based 

on Previous 

Inspection by 

Recognized 

Authority

Approved fresh or processed fruit, vegetable, or specialty 

crop product subject to marketing order quality 

requirements that is intended for sale to consumers, but 

has previously been successfully inspected for 

compliance by a recognized government agency; 

documentation from that recognized government agency 

is being used to request admittance.

AMS-MO2

CASE 3: Request 

Admittance Based 

on Exemption 

Permit Already 

Issued by AMS

Fresh or processed fruit or vegetable product, or specialty 

crop product subject to marketing order quality 

requirements that is intended for exempt purposes and an 

Importer’s Exempt Commodity permit (SC-6) has 

already been issued for this shipment by AMS and is 

being used to request admittance. Pearl onions and onion 

sets are exempted from quality requirements but must be 

inspected for size and be accompanied by an SC-6.

AMS-MO3

CASE 4: Request 

an Exemption 

Permit from AMS

Fresh or processed fruit, vegetable, or specialty crop 

product subject to marketing order quality requirements 

that is intended for an exempt outlet at import or may be 

exempt from inspection requirements but an exemption 

form is required; importer requests that AMS issue an 

Importer’s Exempt Commodity Permit (SC-6) for this 

shipment. Pearl onions and onion sets are exempted from 

quality requirements but must be inspected for size and 

be accompanied by an SC-6.

AMS-MO4

CASE 5: Request 

Aflatoxin Testing 

of Pistachios by 

AMS

Pistachios subject to marketing order quality 

requirements that are intended for human consumption; 

importer requests that AMS draw samples for aflatoxin 

testing by USDA lab or USDA- accredited lab upon 

arrival.

AMS-MO5

CASE 6: Exempt 

Variety or Type

The imported product variety or type is not regulated 

under the marketing order. AMS-MO6

CASE 7: Seasonal 

Exemption

The imported product is not regulated under the 

marketing order at the time of entry. AMS-MO7

CASE 8: 

Minimum 

Exemption

The imported product is not regulated under the 

marketing order because the quantity of product is below 

the established minimum amount.

AMS-MO8
AMS-PN Program Message Sets

SCENARIO CONDITIONS USE MSG

CASE 1: Request 

Inspection by 

AMS 

Importer of peanuts intended for human consumption 

requests that AMS inspect the product for grade and 

sample for aflatoxin after entry. 

AMS-PN1

Source: 

https://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files/documents/AMS%20CATAIR%20Guidelines%20LOCK

ED%20DOWN%20V1-1%202015-05-21.pdf
STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellant,

v.

JOHNNY TOMBERLIN,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-4648

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 8, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County.

Andrew J. Decker, III, Judge.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jay Kubica, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Chuck Collins of the Collins Law Firm, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals an order granting Appellee’s motion for discharge based on

the State’s failure to bring Appellee to trial within 15 days after expiration of the 

175-day speedy trial period. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.191(a), (p). The State argues, 
and Appellee concedes, that the trial court erred when, in calculating the speedy trial 

period, it included the date of Appellee’s arrest. See State v. Naveira, 768 So. 2d 

1254, 1255 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (“[T]he date of arrest is excluded in the 175-day 

calculation of time, despite that the calculation commences from the date of arrest.”). 

Accordingly, we reverse the order granting Appellee’s motion for discharge.1

REVERSED.

MARSTILLER, SWANSON and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.

1 We reject Appellee’s arguments for affirming the order notwithstanding the trial 

court’s error.

2
Oct. 10. 2012 10:36AM 

OctoberS, 2012 

Federal Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave. 

SE West Bldg., Ground Floor Room W12~140 

Washington, D.C 20590.0001 

~- =::; ~ 

, metro 

Re: Luis Mul'loz Marfn International Airport· Slln Juan, Puerto Rfa) 

To Whom It May Contern; 

--No. 3828-P. 2--

,''!:P~j'""'TI J ,_, r, i . VI AENT __ OF 

l R,\hlSPORTATION 

·, .. ,(\veT Q· P'0ATI0i\!S ·.,_;,_,•{\L . Lll. \\. 

zn 1 z on 1 o A 11: L~ \ 

W~ hereby express our support of the Public-Private Partnership between thl:! Puerto Rico Ports Authority and 

Aerostar Airport Holdlnss (''Aerostar"). The Tourism Industry has become a global business. and· our airport 

infrastructure needs to be revamped and operated to cater and compete wlthln this global marketplace and Its 

fast changing standards: San Juan's Luis Munoz Marin International Airport (the ''Airport") llas been losing flights 

In the last years. as more airlines relocate to mor!! modem hubs in the United States to service the other islands in 

our retJion, whldt were traditionally served throu~h this Airport~ as their Caribbean hub. Atcordlng to governmer)t 

sources, around 8.5 million passengers use the Airport annually, throu,h the service of 18 airlines that operate 

more than a hundred daily flights. Over the years, Puerto Rico has failed to modemlze and expand our airport 

Infrastructure, which has limited Puerto Rico's tourism industry potential and growth. The Impacts of which has 

had a cascade effect on new hotel and resort development, the hospitality and gaming Industries, the cruise 

industry, but Puerto Rico's ability to compete as a destination of choice with so many islands competing for 

tourism. 

our Hotel and casino expects that Aerostar's approximate $1.4 billion investment in capital imptovements over the 

ne)(t forty years should enable the Airport to attract new national and International carriers to the Island, as well as 

Improving the quality ofthe facilities and the service experienced by our visitors and tourists. Our hotel foresees 

long term positive growth potential in the tourism and convention sector with modernization of the Airport. 

Aerostar has publicly eltptessed Its short-term plan~ for the Alrport,lnduding leasing the empty spaces In Jet81ults 

Terminal A, replacing broken floor and installing Wi-FI connectivity In the terminals, which should set the base to 

the long-term modernization of thl! Airport and to attract new airlines and retain e)(lstlng carriers. Our hospitality 

Industry growth Is directly tied to the number of passengers traveling to our destination, so more airlines, and 

consequently more flights, should enable Puerto ~ico's tourism lndustly to diversify the markets that seNice 

tourism on the Island, as well as increase the industry's growth prospects. 

Aerostar's success in el(etutlng similar visions and goals In several Mmc11n airports give us sreat confldence that 

the same can be accomplished in San JUan's LUis Mul'loz Marfn International Airport.. 

Rell'lly~~~ 

G(JI:anager 

Casino Metro 

Sheraton Puerto Rlc:o Hotel and Casino
## January 10, 2011234

# • Annual 

# standard of 15 μg/m 3



# • Daily (24- hour) 

# standard of 65 μg/m 3
5 SJV – Annual PM2.5 Levels

SJV – 24 - hour PM2.5 Levels

Source: EPA AQS database6Attainment Demonstration Air Quality Modeling 

# SIP New Rules &

Commitments

Reasonable Progress Demonstration Contingency Measures Adopted Controls Emissions Inventories Reasonably Available Measures

Attainment

Date8 

## SJV Air Pollution Control District • Adopts rules to control stationary sources and some mobile sources • Permits stationary sources • Monitors air quality • Develops air plans • 

### Sets air quality standards • Controls mobile sources • Reviews SIPs • Approves state air quality rules 

## California Air Resources Board • Compiles State emission inventories • Develops Statewide air plan • Adopts Statewide rules (mobile sources, fuels & consumer products ) • Approves District air plans and submits to EPA 

## EPA910 Graphic design courtesy of SJVAPCD11

## Open Burning



## Farming Activities Forest Fires131415Dust Industry Open burning Wood burning Diesel Trucks Off- Road Other

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Direct PM 2.5

Average SJV Day in 2005 16 Source: SJV PM2.5 Plan, Appendix B and H Secondary 49%
Elemental Carbon 4% Other 2% Organic Carbon 41% Geological 4%

Average Chemical Composition of Ambient PM2.5 in Fresno 2004- 2006Diesel Trucks Off- Road Industry Cars Open & Wood Burning Other

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

17 NO x Average SJV Day in 2005 Source: SJV PM2.5 Plan, Appendix BAttainment Level ( 2014) Attainment Level ( 2014) Reductions Needed Reductions Needed

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%



## P M 2 . 5 N O x 18 (from 2005) (from 2005)

Source: SJV PM2.5 Plan, Chapters 8 & 919 Rules completed prior to Plan 48% New Rules in Plan 52% 

# Direct PM 2.5

(22.7 tpd) Rules completed prior to Plan 70% New Rules in Plan 30%


# NO x

(284 tpd) Source: SJV PM2.5 Plan, Chapters 8 & 9

# What are the New Controls in the PM2.5 Plan? • District • Open Burning • Wood Burning Fireplaces • Charbroiling 

# • Stationary engines 

# • State • Trucks & buses • Off- road engines

20212223Attainment Demonstration Air Quality Modeling 

# SIP New Rules &

Commitments

Reasonable Progress Demonstration Contingency Measures Adopted Controls Emissions Inventories Reasonably Available Measures

Attainment

Date252627
**Exhibit 35.1**

**Servicer Compliance Statement of John Deere Capital Corporation**

​

I, Katrin Watkins, Assistant Secretary of John Deere Capital Corporation, state:

​

A review of John Deere Capital Corporation’s activities for the period from October 31, 2022 through October 29, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”) and of John Deere Capital Corporation’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 19, 2022 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables LLC and John Deere Owner Trust 2022-C has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, John Deere Capital Corporation has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

​

​

| ​               | ​                        | ​              |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------|----------------------|
| Date: January 9, 2024 | John Deere Capital Corporation |
| ​               | ​                        | ​              |
| ​               | By:                            | */s/ Katrin Watkins* |
| ​               | ​                        | Katrin Watkins       |
| ​               | ​                        | Assistant Secretary  |
| ​               | ​                        | ​              |
| ​               | ​                        | ​              |
|                       | ​                        | ​              |

​

​

----
Order entered April 6, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01299-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.C., ET AL

On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-76-08723-V

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s April 1, 2015 motion for extension of time to file brief and 

ORDER the brief be filed no later than April 30, 2015. Appellant is cautioned that failure to 

comply with this order may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c).

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Date 4/11/14 Page of



### POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Summary Page

Chemical ID: P-13-0874C Reviewer: Cinali/SS

Endpoints-Assessed Table

Endpoints/Assessment Cycles 1 Releases Assessed in NCEM2? Reasons for not assessing releases

No XB Testing Required No Hazard Concern No Releases Release Below Acute Threshold 5 Release Below Chronic Threshold 5 Other

Ingestion Surface water Ground water (landfill) Consumer Use: DtD 2 Inhalation Air: incineration (stack) Air: fugitive Consumer Use: CEM 3 Dermal Consumer Use: CEM Eco Surface water: ADR conc and/or PDM 4
Consumer Use: DtD

1 Assessment cycles are endpoint concentrations and dose calculations within the NCEM2 model.
2 Down-the-Drain
3 Consumer Exposure Model
4 Probabilistic Dilution Model
5 The threshold values for assessing endpoints are 1 mg/day for acute doses and 1 mg/year for chronic doses.

EAB DROP:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

STACEY ELLA MCKERN, 

a/k/a Michelle E. Aragon, a/k/a Stacey 

Aragon, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 15-1020 

(D.C. No. 1:13-CR-00444-CMA-1) 

(D. Colo.)

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

 

Before LUCERO, MATHESON, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. 

 

 Upon entering into a plea agreement that included an appeal waiver, Stacey 

Ella McKern pleaded guilty to bankruptcy fraud and aiding and abetting and false use 

of a social security number. She was sentenced to eighteen months of imprisonment, 

the top of the guidelines range. Despite the appeal waiver, she appealed. The 

 

* This panel has determined that oral argument would not materially assist the 

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The 

case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment 

is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, 

and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent 

with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

April 7, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court
- 2 - 

government moves to enforce the appeal waiver. See United States v. Hahn, 

359 F.3d 1315, 1328 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam). 

 Ms. McKern concedes that she cannot in good faith oppose the government’s 

motion and make an argument as to any of Hahn’s three appeal-waiver factors: 

“(1) whether the disputed appeal fails within the scope of the waiver of appellate 

rights; (2) whether the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived [her] appellate 

rights; and (3) whether enforcing the waiver would result in a miscarriage of justice.” 

Id. at 1325. 

We have independently reviewed the plea agreement and transcripts of the plea 

and sentencing hearings, and we agree that Ms. McKern cannot in good faith oppose 

enforcement of the appeal waiver. To the extent she wishes to challenge her 

counsel’s performance, we also agree with her that any ineffective assistance of 

counsel argument should be raised in a collateral proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 

See United States v. Galloway, 56 F.3d 1239, 1240 (10th Cir. 1995) (en banc); 

see also Hahn, 359 F.3d at 1327 n.13 (stating that holding “does not disturb [the] 

longstanding rule” of generally considering ineffective-assistance claims on collateral 

review). We therefore do not address an ineffective-assistance claim in this 

proceeding. 

 
- 3 - 

 The motion to enforce is granted and this appeal is dismissed, without 

prejudice to Ms. McKern raising a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in a 

collateral proceeding. 

 Entered for the Court 

 Per Curiam
EXHIBIT
35.1



SERVICER
COMPLIANCE STATEMENT



Re:
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, in its capacity as Servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Amended and Restated
Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2009, among Mercedes-Benz Vehicle Trust, as Titling Trust, Collateral Title Co., as
Collateral Agent, and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, as Lender and as Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”),
and under the 2023-A Servicing Supplement, dated as of May 1, 2023, among the same parties (the “Servicing Supplement”)
for the period from May 24, 2023, to December 31, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”)



I,
Christian Rottenkolber, certify that:



| | (a) | A
                                         review of the Servicer’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance
                                         under the Servicing Agreement and the Servicing Supplement has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | To
                                         the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
                                         obligations under the Servicing Agreement and the Servicing Supplement in all material
                                         respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 20, 2024





| | /s/
    Christian Rottenkolber                        | 
| | ----------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Name:
    Christian Rottenkolber                     
| | Title:
    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Fruit & Specialty Crops 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.

Vegetable Inspection Room 1536-S, STOP 0240

Program Division Washington, DC 20250-0240

October 19, 2012

AMENDMENT NO. 2

COMMODITY SPECIFICATION

CANNED VEGETABLES DATED FEBRUARY 2012

The purpose of this amendment is to revise the can size requirement for tray packs of 

Commercial Packaging and Labeling to include all can sizes in section I. General, H. Packing, 

Labels and Packaging, 2. Secondary Containers (tray and case).

2. Secondary Containers (tray and case).

Commercially acceptable tray packs wrapped in plastic shrink wrap may be used 

on all Solicitations/IBFs for all can sizes. 24/#300 cases may be achieved by 

shrink wrapping together two 12/#300 tray packs. 

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.
### Regular Totals (Holders)

Airport = JFK Season = S Holder = 0001(Exclude) Status Date = 07/01/2009 (Current & Future) 12/21/2010 08:07:26



### Query Parameters:

### 12/21/2010 08:07:26

Carrier 

### Regular Totals (Holders) Excludes FAA Held Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded JFK Season = SUMMER PF7 Status Date = 07/01/2009 (Current & Future)

JFK

189 AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 1 AAR ASIANA AIRLINES 2 ABX ABX AIR 1 ACA AIR CANADA 2 AEA AIR EUROPA 2 AEW AEROSVIT AIRLINES 2 AFL AEROFLOT 11 AFR AIR FRANCE 6 AIC AIR INDIA 7 AJM AIR JAMAICA 4 AMX AEROMEXICO 2 ANA ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS 2 AUA AUSTRIAN 4 AVA AVIANCA 6 AVI L'AVION/OPENSKIES 6 AZA ALITALIA 16 BAW BRITISH AIRWAYS 2 BER AIR BERLIN 7 BWA CARIBBEAN AIRLINES 2 CAL CHINA AIRLINES 4 CCA AIR CHINA 8 COA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 6 CPA CATHAY PACIFIC 2 CSA CZECH AIRLINES 396 DAL DELTA AIR LINES 1 DHK DHL AIRLINES 5 DHL DHL 10 DLH DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 6 EIN AER LINGUS 2 ELY EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES 2 ETD ETIHAD 4 FDX FED EX 2 FIN FINNAIR 4 IBE IBERIA AIRWAYS 2 ICE ICELANDAIR 2 JAI JET AIRWAYS 6 JAL JAPAN AIR LINES 366 JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 3 KAL KOREAN AIR 4 KLM KLM ROYAL DUTCH 2 LAN LAN CHILE 2 LNE LAN ECUADOR 4 LOT LOT - POLISH AIRLINES 1 LRC LACSA 2 MSR EGYPT AIR 7 MXA MEXICANA DE AVIACION 12 NWA NORTHWEST AIRLINES 2 OAL OLYMPIC AIRLINES 2 QFA QANTAS AIRLINES 1 QTR QATAR AIRWAYS 4 RAM ROYAL AIR MAROC

Page 2

### 12/21/2010 08:07:26

Carrier 

### Regular Totals (Holders) Excludes FAA Held Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded JFK Season = SUMMER PF7 Status Date = 07/01/2009 (Current & Future)

JFK

2 RJA ROYAL JORDANIAN 2 SAA SOUTH AFRICAN AIRWAYS 4 SCX SUN COUNTRY AIRLINES, INC. 2 SIA SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED 6 SWR SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (SWISSAIR 3 TAI TACA AIRLINES 4 TAM TAM BRAZILIAN AIRLINES 2 THY TURKISH AIRLINES, INC. 4 UAE EMIRATES 37 UAL UNITED AIRLINES 2 UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 16 USA US AIRWAYS 8 VIR VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIR 20 VRD VIRGIN AMERICA

Page 3