alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION






<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  INTREorg  Systems,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Russell
K. Boyd, Principal Executive Officer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and
Principal  Accounting  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: May 17, 2010


/s/Russell K. Boyd
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Russell K. Boyd, (Principal Executive Officer,
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Furio Resources Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul Fong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



By /s/ Paul Fong

Paul Fong

Chief Executive Officer





October 8, 2004
NO. 07-03-0374-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL A APRIL 30, 2004

______________________________ GERARDO OJEDA, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A PPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 2 22ND DIST RICT COURT OF DEAF SMI TH COUNT Y; NO. CR-02H -103; HONOR ABLE H. BRY

AN POFF, JR ., JUDGE

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ. MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION Appellant

Gerardo Ojeda filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal on April 8, 2004, averr ing thathe no longer wishes to prosecute his appeal. The Motion to Dismiss is signed by both appellant and his

attorney. Without passing on the merits of the c ase, appellant’s motion for vol untary dis missal is granted and the appeal is hereb y dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. H aving di smissed-2-

the appeal at appell ant’s personal request, nomotion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate wi ll issue fort hwith.

Phil Johnson Chief Justice

Do not publish .
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly Report of West Coast Car Company
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending Sept. 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Daniel Drummond, Chief Executive Officer of the small business issuer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the small
business issuer.



/s/ Daniel Drummond
-----------------------
Daniel Drummond
Chief Executive Officer

Nov. 15, 2006
**Exhibit 32.1**

**SENECA GAMING CORPORATIONCERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE OFFICERS**

(Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Seneca Gaming Corporation(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission, we, Brian Hansberry, InterimPresident and Chief Executive Officer, and Patrick M. Fox, Chief FinancialOfficer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       The Quarterly Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended,; and

2.                                       The information contained in the QuarterlyReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operation of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented inthe Form 10-Q.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.

February 13, 2007
| /s/ Brian Hansberry                           |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Brian Hansberry                               |   |
| Interim President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer)                 |   |
|                                          |   |
|                                          |   |
| /s/ Patrick M. Fox                            |   |
| Patrick M. Fox                                |   |
| Chief Financial Officer                       |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer)                 |   |

 

The forgoingcertification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant toItem 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andis not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.

1

----
AAM-12-159-E January 24, 2012

Exemption No. 10066A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0442

Mr. Henry E. Schwarz Owner/Operator

4301 Southwood Drive Alexandria, VA 22309

Dear Mr. Schwarz:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 10066. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated January 4, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) for an extension of Exemption No. 10066. That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Henry E. Schwarz, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Henry E. Schwarz.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10066 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Henry E. Schwarz are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Henry E. Schwarz part 135 operation, not under part 91.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 10066 to May 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 10066 remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 10066.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21802-21803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8613]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AA-9349; LLAK-965000-L14100000-HY0000-P]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that 
the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will issue an appealable decision 
to Calista Corporation. The decision will approve conveyance of the 
surface and subsurface estates in certain lands pursuant to the Alaska 
Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1601, et seq). The lands are 
located north of Mountain Village, Alaska, and contain 3.11 acres. 
Notice of the decision will also be published four times in the 
Anchorage Daily News.

DATES: Any party claiming a property interest in the lands affected by 
the decision may appeal the decision within the following time limits:
    1. Unknown parties, parties unable to be located after reasonable 
efforts have been expended to locate, parties who fail or refuse to 
sign their return receipt, and parties who receive a copy of the 
decision by regular mail which is not certified, return receipt 
requested, shall have until May 11, 2012 to file an appeal.
    2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail 
shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.
    3. Notices of appeal transmitted by electronic means, such as 
facsimile or email, will not be accepted as timely filed.
    Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the 
requirements of 43 CFR part 4, subpart E, shall be deemed to have 
waived their rights.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land 
Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, <greek-i>13, 
Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The BLM by phone at 907-271-5960 or by

[[Page 21803]]

email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dfbeb4f1bdb3b2f1bcb0b1a9baa6beb1bcba9fbdb3b2f1b8b0a9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ccada7e2aea0a1e2afa3a2baa9b5ada2afa98caea0a1e2aba3ba">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons who use a 
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the BLM 
during normal business hours. In addition, the FIRS is available 24 
hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the 
BLM. The BLM will reply during normal business hours.

Dina L. Torres,
Land Transfer Resolution Specialist, Branch of Land Transfer 
Adjudication II.
[FR Doc. 2012-8613 Filed 4-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 99.3


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of Solo Cup  Company  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Susan
H. Marks,  Chief  Financial  Officer,  Executive  Vice  President  and Assistant
Secretary of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with  the requirements  of section
                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.





/s/ Susan H. Marks
------------------
Susan H. Marks
Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President
and Assistant Secretary
August 13, 2004
Exhibit 10.2

      

      

      Amendment No. 1 to the

       

      ATI Physical Therapy, Inc.

       

      2021 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

       

      As adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors on April 13, 2022

      

      

      The ATI Physical Therapy Inc. 2021 Equity Incentive Plan (“Plan”) is hereby amended by replacing Section 4.1 with the following:

      

      

      4.1
         Number of Shares Reserved. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.2 and Section 4.4 hereof, the total number of shares of Common Stock that are available for issuance under the Plan (the “Share Reserve”) shall equal 21,289,233. Within the
        Share Reserve, the total number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance as Incentive Stock Options shall equal 21,289,233. In addition, the Share Reserve and the shares of Common Stock available for issuance as Incentive Stock Options
        shall be increased by the number of shares of Common Stock, if any, up to a maximum of 837,166 shares of Common Stock, that (i) were distributed by Wilco Acquisition, LP (the “Partnership”) to a participant in the Wilco Acquisition, LP 2016 Equity
        Incentive Plan pursuant to the terms of a restricted stock agreement between such participant, the Company and the Partnership and (ii) were or are forfeited by the participant. Each share of Common Stock subject to an Award shall reduce the Share
        Reserve by one share. Any shares of Common Stock delivered under the Plan shall consist of authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares.

      

      

      Except as amended above, the terms of the Plan shall be and remain unchanged, and the Plan as amended is hereby ratified and confirmed and shall remain in
        full force and effect.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-12-00668- CV

Norr is J. DeVoll, Appellan t

v. Steven De P az, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 53RD J UDICIAL DI STRICT NO. D-1 -GN-9 9-0 0317 4, H ONO RAB LE GARY H ARGER, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant No rr i s J

. DeVoll has filed a motion to dismiss this appea l. See Tex. R. App. P

. 42.1(a) (1). Appellee Steven DePaz opposes t he mot ion to dismiss , asser ting t h at De Voll and his alleg ed predec essor in interest, S haron St edman, seek t his dismiss al s o that they ca n h ave “endle ss bites at the apple and may keep passing the judgme nt around—pr esumably by assig nment and rea ssignment—until someone g ets it rig ht.” There fore , acc ording to DePaz, “[d] i s m i ssal of this action will deny [hi m] from seeki ng the relief to which he is otherwise entitled, to-wit: deter mination as to corr ectne ss of the trial court’s ruling , binding either [DeVoll] or Stedman as

succe ssor-appe llant, or both.”

DePaz does not cite to any authority —nor have we found any

—which would support the contention that a party who preva iled at trial has a rig ht to have the corr ectne ss of that judgme nt deter mined by an appell at e court. Cf. Robinson v. Alief Indep. Sch. Dist. , 298 S.W .3d 321, 325(Tex. App.—Houston [14t h Dist.] 2009, pet. denied) (noting that opinion is advisory if “par ty seeks judgme nt upon some matter which cannot have an y prac tical leg al eff ect upon a then exis ting
controve rsy .”). Fur

thermore , our revie w of DePaz’s brief and his response to the motion to dismiss fails t o y ield any

reque st for af

firmative r elief. See Tex. R. App. P

. 42.1(a) (1) (stating that based 1

o n appellant’s motion to dismiss , appellate court “may dismiss appea l or aff irm the appeal ed judgme nt or order unless disposit i o n would preve nt a party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled.”); see also Giffin v. Giffin , 962 S.W .2d 649, 64 9

– 50 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1998, no writ). There fore , we g rant De Voll’s motion and dismi ss this appeal.

__________________________________________ Scott K. Field, Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Goodwin and F ield Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: June 4, 2013

I n the alterna tive, DePaz reque sts that we impose sanctions aga inst DeVoll for filing a 1 frivolou s ap p ea l , b u t does not provide any explanation or authority to support his claim that this a p p e a l is f r iv o lo u s . S

e e T e x. R. A

p p . P. 4 5

. U

p o n r e v ie w o f th e r e c o r d a n d th e b r ie f

in g , w e c o n c lu d e that sanctions are not appropr iate. See Bahar v. Lyon Fin. Servs., Inc. , 3 3 0 S

. W

. 3 d 3 79, 391–92 (Tex. App.—Austin 2010, pet. denied) (noting that s an ct i o ns unwar rante d when party had rea sonable e x pecta tion of reve rsal). The ref ore, w e deny

DePaz’s motion for sanc tions. 2
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 91 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 5, 2020 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol 

Visitor Center for a ceremony to present the Congressional Gold Medal collectively to the Chinese-American 

veterans of World War II. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY 

4 TO PRESENT CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL 

5 TO CHINESE-AMERICAN VETERANS OF 

6 WORLD WAR II. 

7 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the 

8 Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be used on April 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 91 RDS 

1 29, 2020, for a ceremony to present the Congressional 

2 Gold Medal collectively to the Chinese-American veterans 

3 of World War II, in recognition of their dedicated service 

4 during World War II. 

5 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

6 conduct of the ceremony described in subsection (a) shall 

7 be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 

8 Architect of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 4, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with this Amendement No. 2 of Quarterly Report of Tengion, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,   A. Brian Davis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: February 8, 2013
  
 /s/ A. Brian Davis

A. Brian Davis
 Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Finance
 (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
AMERICAN
PATRIOT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.




CERTIFICATIONS




I, T. Don
Waddell, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Patriot Financial Group,
Inc.




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;




b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;




c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;




5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors:




a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.


Date:
      November 16, 2009
              Signature:
              /s/
      T. Don WaddellT.
      Don Waddell
                Chief
      Financial Officer