alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Company Policy Effective Date
  1.
                Persons Subject to Policy
    2.
              Compensation Subject to Policy
  This Policy shall apply to Incentive-Based Compensation received on or after the Effective Date. For purposes of this Policy,
          the date on which Incentive-Based Compensation is “received” shall be determined under the Applicable Rules , which generally provide that Incentive-Based Compensation is “received” in the Company’s fiscal
          period during which the relevant Financial Reporting Measure is attained or satisfied, without regard to whether the grant, vesting or payment of the Incentive-Based Compensation occurs after the end of that period.
  3.
              Recovery of Compensation
    4.
              Manner of Recovery; Limitation on Duplicative Recovery
    1
 5.
              Administration
  Board
  6.
              Interpretation
    7.
              No Indemnification; No Liability
    8.
              Application; Enforceability
  Other Recovery Arrangements
  2
 9.
              Severability
    10.
              Amendment and Termination
    11.
              Definitions
  Applicable Rules
  Committee
  Erroneously Awarded Compensation
  Exchange Act
  Financial Reporting Measure
  GAAP
  IFRS
  3
 Impracticable
  “ Incentive-Based Compensation ” means, with respect to a Restatement, any compensation that is granted, earned, or vested based wholly or in part upon the attainment of one or more Financial Reporting Measures and received by a
          person: (a) after such person began service as an Officer; (b) who served as an Officer at any time during the performance period for that compensation; (c) while the Company has a class of securities listed
          on a national securities exchange or association; and (d) during the applicable Three-Year Period.
  Officer
  Restatement
  “ Three-Year Period ” means, with respect to a Restatement, the three completed fiscal years immediately preceding the date that the Board, a committee of the Board, or the officer or officers of the Company authorized
          to take such action if Board action is not required, concludes, or reasonably should have concluded, that the Company is required to prepare such Restatement, or, if earlier, the date on which a court, regulator or other legally authorized body
          directs the Company to prepare such Restatement. The “Three-Year Period” also includes any transition period (that results from a change in the Company’s fiscal year) within
            or immediately following the three completed fiscal years identified in the preceding sentence. However, a transition period between the last day of the Company’s previous fiscal year end and the first
            day of its new fiscal year that comprises a period of nine to 12 months shall be deemed a completed fiscal year.
  
 4
EX-10.2




 Exhibit 10.2 
  





 
 May 24, 2022 
 Dear Pat,

 This letter memorializes the agreement by Choice Hotels International, Inc. (“Choice”) to provide you with the right to use, at
Choice’s expense, Choice’s then-current corporate aircraft (if any) for personal use for up to forty-five (45) flight hours per calendar year during such time that you are serving as the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Choice, subject to aircraft availability, and consistent with Choice’s Aircraft Use Policy. You will be solely responsible for any taxable income recognizable by you in connection with the personal use of corporate aircraft and will not be
entitled to any tax gross up payments or other reimbursement from Choice in connection therewith. 
 You acknowledge and agree that Choice
is under no obligation to continue its ownership of a corporate aircraft and if Choice no longer owns or leases a corporate aircraft, this letter will be terminated immediately with no further obligations hereunder. You further acknowledge and agree
that if this benefit is discontinued, it will not give rise to your ability to terminate your employment for “Good Reason” under any agreement between you and Choice. 

Please confirm your acceptance of the foregoing by providing your signature below and returning a fully executed copy of this letter. 

 

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Patrick Cimerola
	
	Patrick Cimerola
	Chief Human Resources Officer
	
	Acknowledged and Agreed
	
	 /s/ Patrick Pacious

	Patrick Pacious
(logo) **ARBOR**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

**of**

 

**ARBOR MULTIFAMILY LENDING, LLC**

 

 

Pursuant to the requirementsof Section 3.05 of that certain Primary Servicing Agreement, BMO 2023-C4 MortgageTrust Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2023-C4, dated as ofFebruary 1, 2023 (the “Agreement”) by and between Midland Loan Services, adivision of PNC Bank, National Association (“Master Servicer”) and ArborMultifamily Lending, LLC (“Primary Servicer”), the undersigned, Charles Marino,hereby certifies to the Master Servicer as of the date hereof, solely in hiscapacity as an officer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:

 

1.       A review of the Primary Servicer’s activitiesduring the preceding calendar year or portion thereof and of the PrimaryServicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’ssupervision; and

 

2.       To the best of such officer’sknowledge, based on such review, the Primary Servicer has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such yearor portion thereof.

 

 

Dated: February 15, 2024

 

 

Arbor Multifamily Lending, LLC

 

By: /s/ Charles Marino

Name: Charles Marino

Title: Managing Director,

Servicing and Agency AssetManagement

 

 

333 Earle Ovington Blvd. • Suite 900 • Uniondale, NY11553-3617 • 516.506.4200
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-40870

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TORIBIO MEDINA-LINAN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:12-CR-177-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

TheFederalPublic Defender appointed to represent Toribio Medina-Linan

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Medina-Linan has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as MedinaLinan’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents

no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-40870 Document: 00512347771 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Relationserve Media, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form I0-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Adam Wasserman, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ Adam Wasserman
-----------------------------
Adam Wasserman
Principal Accounting Officer
August 15, 2005
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1057 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1057

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for a code of conduct 
      for justices and judges of the courts of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2019

   Mr. Johnson of Georgia (for himself, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. Beyer, Mr. 
   Blumenauer, Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania, Ms. Brownley of 
    California, Mr. Carson of Indiana, Mr. Casten of Illinois, Mr. 
Cicilline, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Cooper, 
 Mr. Cummings, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. DeSaulnier, Mr. Engel, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. 
 Foster, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Hastings, Ms. Jackson Lee, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. 
    Kennedy, Mr. Khanna, Mr. Kilmer, Mr. Langevin, Mr. Ted Lieu of 
   California, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Lujan, Mr. McGovern, Ms. Moore, Mr. 
Moulton, Ms. Mucarsel-Powell, Mr. Nadler, Ms. Norton, Mr. Pascrell, Ms. 
 Pingree, Mr. Raskin, Mr. Sarbanes, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. David Scott of 
     Georgia, Mr. Smith of Washington, Ms. Speier, Mr. Swalwell of 
 California, Mr. Takano, Mr. Tonko, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Mr. Welch, 
 and Mr. Yarmuth) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for a code of conduct 
      for justices and judges of the courts of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supreme Court Ethics Act''.

SEC. 2. CODE OF CONDUCT.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 57 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 964. Code of conduct
    ``Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this 
section, the Judicial Conference of the United States shall issue a 
code of conduct, which applies to each justice and judge of the courts 
of the United States, except that the code of conduct may include 
provisions that are applicable only to certain categories of judges or 
justices.''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for 
chapter 57 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding after 
the item related to section 963 the following:

``964. Code of conduct.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA

No. 14–1542

Filed April 10, 2015

IOWA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

MORSE HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. d/b/a FAITH RIDGE LIFE 

CENTER, MORSE ENTERPRISES, INC. d/b/a KEVINGTON LANE, 

MANOR OF MALVERN, INC., KEVINGTON LANE, INC., and MARY 

MORSE-BOLTON,

Defendants,

KLAASMEYER & ASSOCIATES, INC.,

Receiver-Appellee,

and

BANK IOWA,

Intervenor-Appellant.

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Mary Pat 

Gunderson, Judge.

A bank appeals a district court decision permitting the payment of 

receivership expenses out of property in which it has a prior perfected 

security interest. REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

Steven H. Krohn, Smith, Peterson Law Firm, Council Bluffs, and 

William B. Serangeli and Joseph M. Borg, Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & 

Hagen, P.C., Des Moines, for appellant.
2

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Amy C. Licht, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee Iowa Department of Human Services.

Jeffrey W. Courter, Nyemaster Goode, P.C., Des Moines, for 

appellee Klaasmeyer & Associates, Inc.

Robert L. Hartwig, Johnston, for amicus curiae Iowa Bankers 

Association.
3

PER CURIAM.

This is the companion interlocutory appeal with facts that mirror 

Iowa Department of Human Services v. DeWitt Bank and Trust Co., ___ 

N.W.2d ___ (Iowa 2015), decided today.

As in DeWitt Bank, the Iowa Department of Human Services (DHS) 

filed an application for relief against the defendant health care providers,

Morse Healthcare Services, Inc., Morse Enterprises Inc., Manor of 

Malvern, Inc., Kevington Lane, Inc., and Mary Morse-Bolton, under Iowa 

Code section 249A.44 (2015). See DeWitt Bank, ___ N.W.2d at ___. The

district court appointed a receiver without formal notice to Bank Iowa, a 

lender that held perfected security interests in the defendant health care 

providers’ property. Bank Iowa intervened and resisted the receiver’s 

applications for fees and expenses. The district court ruled the 

receivership expenses should be paid out of property in which Bank Iowa 

had prior lien interests. Bank Iowa sought interlocutory review. We 

granted its application and expedited the appeal.

In DeWitt Bank, we concluded that Iowa follows the common law 

rule that receivership expenses can be charged to secured property only 

if the secured creditor has consented to the receivership or benefited 

therefrom. ___ N.W.2d at ___. Based on the reasoning set forth in DeWitt 

Bank, we reverse the decision of the district court and remand the case 

for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Costs on appeal are 

taxed against DHS.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All justices concur except Waterman, J., who takes no part.

This opinion shall not be published.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SendTec, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Soltoff, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Paul Soltoff             
|Paul Soltoff                 
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)
|August 21, 2006
# allegiant·

March 18, 2016
U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 400 7th Street, SW Room PL 401 Washington, DC 20591-0001 Subject: Exemption Extension Request Exemption No. 100648 dated March 20, 2014 from FAR §121.623(a)(d)(e)
To Whom It May Concern: Allegiant Air, LLC (Allegiant) is writingyour office to request an extension of exemption 10064
. This exemption allows Allegiant to conduct supplemental operations within the 48 contiguous United States and the District ofColumbia usingthe flight regulations for alternate airports as required by§ 121.619, and the fuel reserve regulations as required by§ 121
.639 that are applicable to domestic operations. Sections of FAR Affected §121.623(a) provides, in pertinent part, that each person releasing an aircraft for operation under IFR shall list at least one alternate airportfor each destination airport in the flight release. §121.623(d) provides, in pertinent part, that no person may release aflight unless he lists each alternate airport in the flight release. §121.643 provides, in pertinent part, that no person may release for flight or takeoff a non-turbine orturbopropeller powered airplane unless, considering the wind and other weather conditions expected , it has enough fuel - 1
.To fly to and land at the airportto which it is released; 2. Thereafter, to fly to and land at the most distant alternate airport specified in the flight release; and 3
. Thereafter, to fly for45 minutes at normal cruising fuel consumption


## 1201 N. Town Center Dr., Las Vegas, NV 89144§121.645(e) provides, in pertinent part, that the fuel requirements of §121.643 apply to air carrier's conducting supplemental operations within the 48 contiguous States and the District ofColumbia with a turbine powered airplane
. Discussion Allegiant Air, believes that grantingthis extension will continue to afford an equivalent or greater level of safety to that provided for in FAR sections 121
.623(a) and 121.623(d), 121.643, and 121.645(d). Summary Allegiant Air petitions the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an extension of Exemption No. 100648 dated March 20, 2014
. Sincerely,

Michael Wuerger Director, Flight Safety, Regulatory Compliance, and 

### QA Allegiant Air Michaei.Wuerger@allegiantair.com Direct: (702) 830-8248
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief FinancialOfficer of CommunitySouth Financial Corporation (the “Company”), each certifythat, to his knowledge on the date of this certification:

 

1.               The quarterly report of the Company for the periodended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon this date (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: August 14, 2009 | By:                           | /s/ C. Allan Ducker, III |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                            | C. Allan Ducker, III     |
|                            | Chief Executive Officer       |
|                            | (Principal Executive Officer) |
|                            |                          |
| Date: August 14, 2009 | By:                           | /s/ John W. Hobbs             |
|                            | John W. Hobbs                 |
|                            | Chief Financial Officer       |
|                            | (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







The
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Cross Canyon Energy Corp. (the
“Company”), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:  June
      3, 2009
            
            /s/  Robert P. MunnRobert
      P. MunnPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**Exhibit 4.16**

**IRREVOCABLE WAIVER**

Reference is made to certain shareholder support agreementdated                and                , respectively (the“Agreements”) by and among Prime Impact Acquisition I, a Cayman Islands exempted company (“SPAC”), Cheche Group Inc., a Cayman Islands exempted company (“Holdings”), Cheche Technology, Inc., aCayman Islands exempted company (the “Company”) and certain shareholders of the Company (each a “Written Consent Party” and collectively, the “Written Consent Parties”). Capitalized terms used butnot otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreements. 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2.1(b) of the respective Agreements, each Written Consent Party agrees that from and after the Expiration Time until the earliest of (i) six months after the Acquisition Closing, (ii) the first date after the closing price of the SurvivingCompany Class A Ordinary Shares equals or is greater than $12.50 per share (as adjusted for share sub-divisions, share capitalizations, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 tradingdays within any 30-trading day period after the Acquisition Closing, or (iii) the consummation of a Change of Control of the Surviving Company after the Acquisition Closing, such Written Consent Partyshall not Transfer any Equity Securities of the Surviving Company issued at the Acquisition Merger Effective Time pursuant to the Acquisition Merger in respect of such Written Consent Party’s Written Consent Party Company Securities (the“Written Consent Party Surviving Company Securities”). 

WHEREAS, SPAC, Holdings and the Company intent to release, on a*pro rata* basis, certain Written Consent Party Surviving Company Securities held by the Written Consent Parties from the lock-up and transfer restrictions set forth under Section 2.1 (b) of therespective Agreements. 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10.14 of the respective Agreements, a waiver of claim, power, right, privilegeor remedy shall be valid if set forth in an instrument in writing signed by the party or parties to be bound thereby, and any such waiver shall not be applicable or have any effect except in the specific instance in which it is given. 

NOW, THEREFORE, SPAC, Holdings and the Company hereby irrevocably and forever waive such number of Written Consent Party Surviving CompanySecurities set forth opposite the names of the Written Consent Parties in Appendix I hereto, from the lock-up and transfer restrictions under 2.1 (b) of the respective Agreements, and irrevocably and foreverrelease them from such restrictions with respect to such number of securities so waived. 

Except as set forth above, all of rights underthe Agreements shall remain in full force and effect. 

[*Signature to Follow*]

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this waiver of covenant to be duly executedas of the date first above written. 

 

  
-2- 

 

 

**Appendix I**

 
 

-3-