alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John SCOTT, Mabel Lewis, Jack Mead, Dora Bell Waggoner, and Sue Ann Corvin, Appellants, v. OKLAHOMA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; R. E. Carleton; E. L. Collins; W. L. Findley; Elna Juergens; Jack Mace; Harry Shackleford and Leslie Fisher, as members of the Oklahoma State Board of Education, Appellees.

No. 52810.

Court of Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1.

Sept. 16, 1980.

Released for Publication by Order of Court of Appeals Oct. 16, 1980.

Lana Jeanne Tyree, Jane E. Gallagher, Oklahoma City, for appellants.

Jan Eric Cartwright, Atty. Gen., John F. Percival, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellees.

ROMANG, Judge:

Before April 10 of their third year of teaching the five Appellant teachers (Teachers) were given notice that they would not be offered a contract for the fourth, succeeding year. Arguing that since they were under contract to complete the third year, they had completed three years and were tenured under 70 O.S. 1971, § 622, since repealed and re-enacted, that they could not be terminated except for cause after a due process hearing. The District Court granted summary judgment to the Defendants. We affirm.

This appeal raises no substantive issue. The teachers had not “completed” three years of teaching when notified of non-re*411newal. The statute says “[t]he failure to renew a contract by the board of education of any teacher who has completed three (3) years shall not be effective ...Conversely, where the non-renewal occurs before the completion of three years it is effective. Appellants’ contention would reduce a three year probationary period to two years-a result clearly not intended. Until the third year is completed, limited by the statutory requirement that notice of non-renewal be given by April (70 O.S. 1971, § 6-101), the public employer represented by the board of education may decide whether to renew or not. It did so in this case and its action was timely and effective. *Cf. Cavett v. Geary Board of Education,*Okl., 587 P.2d 991 (1978), not squarely in point since the argument there was that the Board had resolved to issue a fourth year’s contract but changed its mind before April 10th. The Court held the announced intent to renew was not a contract and three years had not been completed.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

REYNOLDS, P. J., concurs.

BOX, J., not participating.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 17 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 17

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         regarding health care.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

   Ms. McCollum submitted the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         regarding health care.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Health care, including care to prevent and treat 
illness, is the right of the people and necessary to ensure the 
strength of the Nation.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce and implement 
this article by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 11 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to provide 

for balanced budgets for the Government. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. FITZPATRICK (for himself and Mr. GALLAGHER) submitted the following 

joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to provide for balanced budgets for the Government. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 11 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Total outlays for any fiscal year shall 

3 not exceed total receipts for that fiscal year, unless two4 thirds of the whole number of each House of Congress 

5 shall provide by law for a specific excess of outlays over 

6 receipts by a rollcall vote. 

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. Prior to each fiscal year, the President 

8 shall transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the 

9 United States Government for that fiscal year in which 

10 total outlays do not exceed total receipts. 

11 ‘‘SECTION 3. The Congress may waive the provisions 

12 of this article for any fiscal year in which a declaration 

13 of war is in effect by a rollcall vote. 

14 ‘‘SECTION 4. The Congress may waive the provisions 

15 of this article for any fiscal year in which a declaration 

16 of national emergency is in effect, as so declared by a joint 

17 resolution, adopted by a majority of the whole number of 

18 each House, which becomes law. 

19 ‘‘SECTION 5. The Congress may waive the provisions 

20 of this article for any fiscal year in which a declaration 

21 of a natural disaster is in effect, as so declared by a joint 

22 resolution, adopted by a majority of the whole number of 

23 each House, which becomes law. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HJ 11 IH 

1 ‘‘SECTION 6. The Congress shall enforce and imple2 ment this article by appropriate legislation, which may rely 

3 on estimates of outlays and receipts. 

4 ‘‘SECTION 7. This article shall take effect beginning 

5 with the fifth fiscal year beginning after its ratification.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions 

Meeting Documentation Date Staff Contact Information 

(Name, email, phone #) 

Name of Organization (Attach list of all attendees names and emails if possible) 

Summary of Discussion (e.g., applicability, reporting requirements, etc.) 

Written Comments Provided? Did they asubmit to Docket? 

05/25/10 Email Correspondence 

Toby Mandel ICF International, tmandel@icfi.com 202-862-1566 on behalf of EPA under Contract EP-W-07-068, Task Order 68 

Bob Luedeka Polyurethane Foam Association rluedeka@pfa.org 865-657-9840 

1. Can you let me know if packaging foams 

are open cell foams (as opposed to closed cell)? Or are they made from a combination of open and closed cell materials?

They are both - packaging foams can be closed cell PUR - either spray in place, two-part "bagged", or fabricated closed cell such as fabricated corner guards used to shield corners of heavy appliances. (A lot stronger than expanded polystyrene "bead board") or open cell FPF (our product) is also used for packaging, but it is the same as all our products and open cell throughout. Extruded polyethylene foam is also used in packaging. It is part of a different industry and is all closed cell (think pool noodles and the type of packaging that feels "slick" and squeaks and wrinkles when you rub your fingers over it.) 

N/A
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8862]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


National Science Board; Sunshine Act Meeting

    The National Science Board's Committee on Strategy and Budget Task 
Force on Data Policies, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), 
the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), 
and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives 
notice in regard to the scheduling of a teleconference for the 
transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, April 19, from 4 p.m. to 5 p.m., EDT.

SUBJECT MATTER: Discussion of a continuation of the National Science 
Board's focus on data policies.

STATUS: Open.

LOCATION: This meeting will be held by teleconference at the National 
Science Board Office, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230. A public listening room will be available for this 
teleconference meeting. All visitors must contact the Board Office 
(call 703-292-7000 or send an email message to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cda3acb9a4a2a3aca1beaea4a8a3aea8afbfa98da3beabe3aaa2bb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5b353a2f3234353a372838323e35383e39293f1b35283d753c342d">[email protected]</span></a>) at least 24 hours prior to the 
teleconference for the public room number and to arrange for a 
visitor's badge. All visitors must report to the NSF visitor desk 
located in the lobby at the 9th and N. Stuart Streets entrance on the 
day of the teleconference to receive a visitor's badge.

UPDATES AND POINT OF CONTACT: Please refer to the National Science 
Board Web site www.nsf.gov/nsb for additional information and schedule 
updates (time, place, subject matter or status of meeting) may be found 
at http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/notices/. Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Blane Dahl, National Science Board Office, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-7000.

Ann Bushmiller,
Senior Counsel to the National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2012-8862 Filed 4-9-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of 26North BDC, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year endedDecember 31, 2023, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Brendan McGovern, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Jonathan Landsberg, as the Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. 

 
/s/ Brendan McGovernName: Brendan McGovernTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer (*Principal Executive Officer*)Date: March 8, 2024/s/ Jonathan LandsbergName: Jonathan LandsbergTitle: Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (*Principal Financial Officer*)Date: March 8, 2024
A signed original of this written statement as required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledgingor otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or itsstaff upon request. 
**
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 484

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding

personal safety for children, and for other purposes.

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 484

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas 840,279 individuals were reported missing in 2001,

and 85 to 90 percent of these missing persons were children;

Whereas approximately 58,200 children were abducted by

nonfamily members in 1999, often in connection with another crime;
2

•HCON 484 EH

Whereas 115 of all nonfamily abductions (those perpetrated

by strangers) resulted in the child being kept overnight,

held for ransom, or killed;

Whereas over 50 percent of the children kidnapped in nonfamily abductions were taken away from the street in a

vehicle or from a park or wooded area;

Whereas a central element of the congressionally-mandated

mission of the National Center for Missing and Exploited

Children (NCMEC) is the prevention of child victimization;

Whereas the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, with the help of parents, local communities, and

law enforcement, has assisted in the recovery of approximately 67,000 children;

Whereas the Departments of Justice, Health and Human

Services, and Education recently developed a booklet, entitled ‘‘Personal Safety for Children’’, which offers easyto-read tips for parents to discuss safety and protection

measures with their children;

Whereas parents and educators need to teach children about

safety measures they can use to protect themselves

against abduction and exploitation and to encourage

them to be smart, strong, and safe; and

Whereas President George W. Bush plans to convene the

first-ever White House Conference on Missing, Exploited,

and Runaway Children with policymakers, experts, community leaders, teachers, and law enforcement to discuss

how to prevent the victimization of children: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—
3

•HCON 484 EH

1 (1) it is the sense of the Congress that—

2 (A) Federal, State, and local law enforce3 ment agencies and communities should work to4 gether to prevent the victimization of children;

5 and

6 (B) communities, schools, and parents

7 should learn more about the steps that may be

8 taken to safeguard children and teach children

9 the skills they need to be safe; and

10 (2) the Congress recognizes the booklet, ‘‘Per11 sonal Safety for Children’’, as one of the tools avail12 able to help parents and teachers talk with children

13 about personal safety.

Passed the House of Representatives October 1,

2002.

Attest:

Clerk.
**Exhibit
32.1**
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SNB Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harvey
Zinn, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
   **SNB BANCSHARES, INC.**Date:   May 13, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Harvey ZinnPresident and Chief Executive Officer
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-11-01106-CV

MICHAEL WEBB, Appellant

V.

AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK, Appellee

Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 985259).

After inspecting the record of the court below, the Court holds that it lacks 

subject-matter jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, the Court dismisses the appeal.

The Court orders that the appellant, Michael Webb, pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered April 7, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle.
Fruit & Specialty Crops 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.

Vegetable Inspection Room 1536-S, STOP 0240

Program Division Washington, DC 20250-0240

September 17, 2015 

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1

COMMODITY SPECIFICATION

DEHYDRATED POTATOES – June 2014

The purpose of this amendment is to amend Section II. Individual Commodity Specificitions, to 

remove part C. Lot Compliance and make the following changes (in blue):

II. Individual Commodity Specifications

A. The dehydrated potatoes shall meet the salient characteristics specified in 

 CID A-A-20032 effective on the date of the Solicitation/IFB for: 

o Type I Diced, Style A Without Peel. 

o Type II Mashed, Style A Granules, Style B Flakes without Peel. 

o Type III Sliced Style A Peeled 1/8 inch Style A without Peel. 

1. Additives or optional ingredients –

a. Sodium sulfite or sodium acid sulfite or other approved sulfating agents – up to 500 parts 

per million (ppm) (Calculated as sulfur dioxide). 

b. Any safe and suitable emulsifiers and/or antioxidants as permitted by provisions under the 

Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. 

2. Moisture – Not more than 9.0 percent. 

3. Reducing sugars – Not more than 4.0 percent. 

B. Test Procedures 

Test procedures for moisture, shall be in accordance with the procedures outlined in 

CID A-A-20032 effective on the date of the Solicitation/IFB for vendors to sell.

C. Net Weight Specifications 

1. For product packed 12/1-pound packages or 12.0 pounds/case, the sample average net weight 

shall meet the net weight requirements. No individual container shall have unreasonable 

shortage. Unreasonable net weight shall be: 
Net Weight Requirement Unreasonable Net Weight 

16 ounces (1 pound) 15.7 ounces or less 

12.0 pounds/case 11 pounds, 12 ounces or less/case 

2. For product packed in cases of 6 No. 10 size cans, the containers shall be filled with 

dehydrated potatoes to an average net weight of 96.0 ounces per container, with no individual 

container weighing less than 94.5 ounces. 

3. For product packed 6 bags per case, the bags shall be filled with dehydrated potatoes to an 

approximate weight of 80 ounces (5 pounds) per bag. The net weight of the 6 bags per case 

shall total 30 pounds with no individual case having a net weight less than 29 pounds, 11 

ounces.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.
#### Jerry A. BELVIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent.

No. 76-1245.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 16, 1976.

Decided July 29, 1976.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 19, 1976.

Daniel E. Wherry, U. S. Atty., Lincoln, Neb., and Thomas D. Thalken, Asst. U. S. Atty., Omaha, Neb., for respondent.

Charles I. Scudder, Omaha, Neb., for petitioner.

Before GIBSON, Chief Judge, LAY and HENLEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 from a denial by the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, the Honorable Robert V. Denney presiding, of Jerry A. Belvin’s petition to set aside his guilty plea. The only issue raised on appeal is the trial court’s failure to hold an evidentiary hearing on petitioner’s mental competency.

On December 14, 1973, a grand jury returned an indictment against the petitioner charging him with kidnapping under 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a), interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle under 18 U.S.C. § 2312, and interstate transportation and use of a firearm by a felon under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(a) and 924(a) and (c).

After Belvin entered a plea of not guilty to all charges, his counsel sought a competency examination pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4244 because at that time petitioner claimed that he had amnesia and could not remember the events leading to his arrest and indictment. The trial court committed Belvin to the Springfield Medical Center for purposes of a competency examination. Thereafter Judge Denney received an opinion from the staff of the medical center which concluded that the petitioner “is presently a personality problem but is free of mental disease or defect and we consider him competent to return to court to stand trial.” Petitioner was returned to the district court and upon motion of his counsel was allowed an independent psychiatric examination. At a subsequent hearing counsel announced,

> I have had Belvin examined by someone whom I feel to be a competent psychiatrist and also tests run by some compe*1336tent neurologists hiere in Omaha. .

> [I]f they were called, they would have to say such condition [amnesia] does not exist.

Both prior to and after this comment, the court inquired if Belvin understood the nature of the proceedings and was satisfied with the performance of his attorney. At all times, petitioner responded in the affirmative.

On this basis Judge Denney accepted the withdrawal of petitioner’s plea of not guilty and entrance of his guilty plea. On May 2, 1974, Belvin was sentenced to 25 years imprisonment.

We find no error in these proceedings. Under the circumstances there is an insufficient showing to raise a bona fide question or reasonable doubt as to petitioner’s competence and the trial court was under no obligation to hold an evidentiary hearing. *See, e.g., United States v. Dworshak,*514 F.2d 716 (8th Cir. 1975); *United States v. Knohl,*379 F.2d 427 (2nd Cir. 1967). We therefore affirm the denial of the § 2255 petition on the basis of Judge Denney’s opinion.

It is so ordered.
Exhibit
10.6

June 15, 2005

Graham Capital
Management, L.P.
 Rock Ledge Financial Center
 40 Highland
Avenue
 Rowayton, CT 06853

Attention: Mr. Paul
Sedlack

Re:    Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Mr. Sedlack:

We are writing with respect
to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which
reference is made below (the "Management
Agreements"). We are extending the term of the Management
Agreements through June 30, 2006 and all other provisions of the
Management Agreements will remain
unchanged.

		
	• 	Smith Barney Global Markets
Futures Fund


		
	• 	Smith Barney Diversified
Futures Fund L.P. II


		
	• 	Smith Barney
Diversified Futures Fund L.P.


		
	• 	Salomon
Smith Barney Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P.


		
	• 	AURORA
2001


		
	• 	AURORA
III


		
	• 	Salomon Smith Barney Fairfield
Futures Fund L.P.


		
	• 	Citigroup Diversified
Futures Fund L.P.


		
	• 	Citigroup Fairfield
Futures Fund L.P. II


		
	• 	Alera
100


		
	• 	Alera Portfolio Spc


Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing
one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel
McAuliffe at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-559-5043.

Very truly
yours,

CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC

		
	By: 	/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.

Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
 Chief Financial Officer and Director


GRAHAM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT,
L.P.

		
	By: 	/s/ Paul Sedlack


Print Name: Paul Sedlack

DRMcA/sr
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 75 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2019 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make 

a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 3055. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3055, 

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the 

4 following corrections: 

5 (1) Amend the long title so as to read: ‘‘Making 

6 further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 

7 2020, and for other purposes.’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 75 RDS 

1 (2) Redesignate the second subsection (a) of 

2 section 1703 as subsection (b). 

Passed the House of Representatives November 19, 

2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS