alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
7/16/2015 Request for Information ­ Land Air Beyond Photography (FAA­2015­1660)

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAABFvqQJAFf5SI8crGhIsEIyBwD3qfMUO7BCQ74YBi9P12... 1/1

Request for Information ­ Land Air Beyond Photography (FAA­2015­1660)

9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions (FAA)

Sent:Thursday, July 16, 2015 11:44 AM

To: green.770@comcast.net

Dear Mr. Green:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA−2015−1660).

This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove

closed‐set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested

response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want

us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 7/30/2015. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

Thank you for your interest in aviation safety.

FAA Office of Rulemaking
Water Quality Standards Regulatory Clarifications

Proposed Rule: Public Meeting

October 29, 2013

Meeting Purpose 

This public meeting is an opportunity for EPA to provide the public with information about the proposed rule

and for the public to ask clarifying questions about the proposed rule.  EPA intends to provide information

that the public can use to develop constructive and helpful comments to submit through the formal comment

process. EPA will consider all formal comments in developing the final rule.   

Meeting Structure 

During the first portion of the meeting, EPA will present an overview of the proposed rule.  Meeting

participants can record questions on the note cards provided in each packet, and EPA will begin to answer

clarifying questions prior to the lunch break, if time allows.  After the lunch break, EPA will respond to

additional questions that the audience has provided on the note cards.

The meeting is not structured as an opportunity for participants to provide comment or present opinions.

Because this meeting is not being recorded for inclusion in the docket, EPA requests that any public comments

or opinions on the proposed rule be submitted through the formal comment process. There is a handout in

the packet that provides details on how to submit comments and opinions on the proposed rule to the docket.

Meeting Outline 

10:00 a.m.–10:05 a.m. Opening Remarks

Sara Hisel‐McCoy, Director, Standards and Health Protection Division

10:05 a.m.–10:30 a.m. Welcome, Introductions, and Meeting Logistics  

Clair Meehan, Tetra Tech, Inc.

10:30 a.m.–11:30 a.m. EPA Presentation of the Water Quality Standards Regulatory Clarifications

Proposed Rule  

Speakers: Janita Aguirre, Christina Christensen, Heather Goss, Gary Russo

11:30 a.m.–12:45 p.m.   Lunch Break (on your own)

12:45 p.m.–3:00 p.m. Response to Audience Questions  

– Moderators: Shari Barash, Manjali Vlcan

– Speakers: Janita Aguirre, Christina Christensen, Heather Goss, Gary Russo

3:00 p.m.     Closing Remarks

Grace Robiou, Chief, National Water Quality Standards Branch

More information about the proposed rulemaking is available on EPA’s website:

http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/lawsguidance/wqs_index.cfm
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







The
undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of ABC Funding, Inc. (the “Company”),
does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) of the Company
for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:  February
      12, 2009
            
            /s/  Carl A. ChaseCarl
      A. ChaseChief
      Financial Officer and
              (Principal
      Accounting and Financial Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**Exhibit 35.1**

**Servicer Compliance Statement of John Deere Capital Corporation**

​

I, Katrin Watkins, Assistant Secretary of John Deere Capital Corporation, state:

​

A review of John Deere Capital Corporation’s activities for the period from October 30, 2023 through October 27, 2024 (the “Reporting Period”) and of John Deere Capital Corporation’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 19, 2023 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables LLC and John Deere Owner Trust 2023-C has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, John Deere Capital Corporation has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

​

​

| ​                | ​                        | ​              |
|------------------------|--------------------------------|----------------------|
| Date: January 10, 2025 | John Deere Capital Corporation |
| ​                | ​                        | ​              |
| ​                | By:                            | */s/ Katrin Watkins* |
| ​                | ​                        | Katrin Watkins       |
| ​                | ​                        | Assistant Secretary  |
| ​                | ​                        | ​              |
| ​                | ​                        | ​              |
|                        | ​                        | ​              |

​

----
#### S. Belch, Superintendent of the Reform School of the State of Florida, Plaintiff in Error, v. Emma Manning, by Next Friend Fances Manning, Defendant in Error.

(Supreme Court of Florida, *En Banc,*

November 20, 1907).

Writ of Error to Circuit Court, Jackson county; J. Emmet Wolfe, Judge.

C. L. Wilson, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant in error.

This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error. There was judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant takes writ of error. Dismissed on motion of counsel for plaintiff in error.
| Dated:   |   May      4, 2009 |   |   |         | RIDGEWOOD      ENERGY L FUND, LLC                    |
|--------------------|------------------------------|--------|--------|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|               |                         | By:    | /s/    |    | ROBERT      E. SWANSON                                    |
|               |                         |   | Name:  |         | Robert      E. Swanson                                    |
|               |                         |   | Title: |         | President      and Chief Executive Officer                |
|               |                         |   |   |         | (Principal      Executive Officer)                        |
|               |                         |   |   |         |                                                      |
| Dated:             |   May      4, 2009 |   |   |         |                                                      |
|               |                         | By:    | /s/    |         | KATHLEEN      P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|               |                         |   | Name:  |         | Kathleen      P. McSherry                                 |
|               |                         |   | Title: |         | Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|               |                         |   |   |         | (Principal      Financial Officer)                        |
|               |                         |   |   |         |                                                      |
|               |                         |   |   |         |                                                      |

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 4290** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JAMES BEARRIE HYLTON , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. Thomas D. Schroeder , District Judge. ( 1:12

- cr - 00292

- TDS

- 1 )

Submitted : October 15, 2013 Decided: October 22, 2013

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Louis C. Allen , III, Federal Public Defender, Gregory Davis , Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Ripley Rand, United States Attorney, T. Nick Matkins, Special Assistant United States Attorney, G reensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM : James Bearrie Hylton appeals the district court’s judgment sentencing him to seventy months’ imprisonment for possession of a firearm b y a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§ 922(g)(2) (2006). On appeal, Hylton argues that his sentence is substant ively unreasonable. We affirm. We review a sentence for reasonableness, applying an abuse of discretion standard. Gall v. United States , 552 U. S. 38, 51 (2007). In doing so , we first examine the sentence for significant procedural error, including improperly calculating the advisory Sentencing Guidelines range, treating the Guidelines as mandatory, fail ing to consider the 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a) (20 06) sentencing factors, choos ing a sentence based on clearly erroneous facts, or failing to adequately explain the
sentence. Id. at 51. W e assess the substantive reasonableness of the sentence under the totality of the circumstances. United
States v. Me ndoza

– Mendoza , 597 F.3d 212, 216 (4th Cir. 2010). If the sentence is within the Guidelines range, we presume on appeal that the sentence is substantively reasonable. United
States v. St ri eper , 666 F.3d 288, 295 (4th Cir. 2012 )
. We conclude that Hylton’s sentence , which was at the bot tom of the properly calculated S entencing Guidelines range, is not substantively unreasonable. The district court considered and rejected Hylton’s arguments for a below

-3 Guidelines sentence. The court noted that Hylton’s crim inal history and lack of employment history weighed against him, fin ding that a within

- Guidelines sentence was necessary to provide just punishment and protect the public. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Because the district court acted well within its consider able discretion in making this finding, we conclude that Hylton has not rebutted the presumption of reasonable ness that attaches t o a within

- Guidelines sentence. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before this court and argument will not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 13, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00230

- CV

IN RE SEMGROUP CORP., Rose Rock Midstream, L.P., and Rose Rock Midstream Field Services, LLC

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

On April 13, 2016, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an unopposed emergency motion for temporary relief. This court is of the opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b). The r espondent and the real parties in interest may file a response to the petition

for writ of mandamus in this court no later than May 4, 2016

. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.

Relator s ’ request for temporary relief is GRANTED. The trial court’s order compelling the depositions of Norm Szydlowski and Pete Schwiering to occur by April 24, 2016 is TEMPORARILY STAYED pending further order of this court. Plaintiffs’ notices of intention to take the depositions of Norm Sz ydlowski and Pete Schwiering beginning April 22, 2016 are also TEMPORARILY STAYED pending further order of this court.

It is so ORDERED on April 13, 2016

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

__________________________________

Keith E. Hottle , Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 15

- 01

- 13356

- ZCV , styled Maribel Rodriguez, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of David Rodriguez, Deceased and as Next Friend of Maribel Rodriguez, Alejandro Rodriguez and David Rodrigu ez, Minors; Juan Rodriguez, Individually, and Maria A. Cerda de Rodriguez, Individually v. Rose Rock Midstream Field Services, LLC; Rose Rock Midstream, LP; SemGroup Corporation and Jesus T. Riojas , pending in the 293rd Judicial District Court

, Zavala Coun ty, Texas, the Honorable Bill C. White presiding.
# t^T'^^'3-^^ 3 - \Hb^* i v\^^^ ^

Marc h 21,201 1 Er a Alask a Carrior s Er a Aviation , Inc

. Frontie rFlyin g Service , Inc

. Hagelan d Aviatio n Services , Inc

. Arcti cCircl e Ai rService

. Inc

. Reservacions : 1-800-866-839 4 •www.flyera.co m

e n Kevi n Adams , Industr yEconomis t U S Departmen t o fTransportation , Offic e o fAviatio n Analysi s X-53 , Suit e W-486-47 0 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenu e Washington , D C 2059 0 Dea rKevin , Thi s lette rrepresent s th e undersigne d participant s o fth e Posta l Service/Ai rCarrie rWorkgrou p (PAW ) wh o ar e requestin g informatio n fro m you roffice

. Thi s workgroup , consistin g o fUSP S an d ai rcarrie rrepresentatives , i s forme d t o identify , promot e an d achiev e efficiencie s throug h statutor yan d regulator ychang e o rothe rmeans , tha twil l resul t i n cos t reduction s fo rth e Posta l Servic e i n a n effor tt o preserv e th e intra-Alask a mai l an d transportatio n system

. Th e workgrou p woul d lik e t o reques tyou rassistanc e i n th e calculatio n o fa compariso n rate , utilizin g th e curren texistin g cost s an d methodolog ystructure , wit h a chang e i n tha tmethodolog y wher e al l element s attributabl e t o an ypassenge ro rfreigh t cost s tha tth e airline s incu rar e remove d fro m th e mai l rat e settin g process
. Th e inten ti s t o understan d th e impac ttha tthos e cost s whic h ar e no tattributabl e t o th e transportatio n o fmai l hav e o n th e curren t rat e settin g process , an d ultimately , o n th e fina l publishe d rates

. I n addition , w e woul d lik e t o reques ttha tw e b e provide d wit h th e tabula rcos tdat a tha tRya n Ai r report s t o th e DOT

. W e understan d tha tthi s dat a i s no tcurrentl yutilize d i n th e existin g rat e settin g methodology

. I fyo u hav e an yquestion s concernin g thes e requests , pleas e fee l fre e t o contac tBo b Hajdukovic h a t 907-322-2902

. W e than k

yo u fo ryou rconsideratio n i n thi s matter

. 

### Sincerely ,

/ •,-;"'J s

;<///^ ^ Bo b Hajdukovic h O n behal fof ;

### Pag e 2 of2

Bo b Hajdukovic h - CE O Er a Alask a Carrier s - Frontier , Era , Hageland , Arcti cCircl e bobfa)frontierflvina.co m m(kehDobox(®qci.ne t Steve n Deato n - Manage r U.S

. Posta l Servic e Steven.r.deaton(a)usps.ao v Susa n Hosha w- Directo ro fGroun d Service s Evert s Ai rCarg o shoshaw(a3evertsair.co m Ar t Warbelo w- Presiden t Warbelow' s Ai rVentures , Inc

. art(a)w a rbelows.co m
Ti m Votti s - Presiden t Yut e Ai r timvottisf^fltalaska.ne t
Davi d Kar p - Presiden t Norther n Ai rCarg o dkarD(a)nac.aer o Eri cHowa t - Manage rPosta l Affair s Alask a Airline s Eric.HowatfS ) AlaskaAir.co m toraue.zubeck(5)AlaskaAir.co m Jo e McDonal d - Manage r U.S

. Posta l Servic e ioefir,mcdonald{a)usDs.qo v Jud yMcKenzi e - Presiden t Lynde n Ai rCarg o JUDY{a)tac.lvnden.co m Dann ySeyber t - Presiden t Pe n Ai r scottb(a)penair.co m dannvs{n)penair.co m Mik e Berg t - Presiden t Ai rCarg o Expres s Mikefa)aceaircarqo

. co m area{S!aceaircarQo.co m Wilfre d P

. Rya n - Presiden t Rya n Air , Inc

. wrvanfo ) rvanalaska.co m
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 76 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Education 

relating to ‘‘Borrower Defense Institutional Accountability’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2019 

Mrs. LEE of Nevada (for herself, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Ms. DELAURO, Mrs. 

DAVIS of California, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. COURTNEY, Ms. FUDGE, Mr. 

SABLAN, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Ms. BONAMICI, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. 

ADAMS, Mr. DESAULNIER, Mr. NORCROSS, Ms. JAYAPAL, Ms. WILD, 

Mrs. MCBATH, Ms. SCHRIER, Ms. UNDERWOOD, Mrs. HAYES, Ms. 

SHALALA, Mr. LEVIN of Michigan, Ms. OMAR, Mr. TRONE, Ms. STEVENS, 

Mrs. TRAHAN, Mr. CASTRO of Texas, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. POCAN, Mr. 

CLEAVER, Mrs. BUSTOS, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS

of Illinois, Mr. CASE, Ms. GARCIA of Texas, Mr. MOULTON, Mr. SCHRADER, Ms. FRANKEL, Mr. NADLER, Mr. CLAY, Ms. PRESSLEY, Ms. SCANLON, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. VISCLOSKY, Mr. GALLEGO, Ms. 

FINKENAUER, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Mr. PASCRELL, Mrs. WATSON

COLEMAN, Ms. TLAIB, Mr. RICHMOND, Ms. PORTER, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. 

SIRES, Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. CICILLINE, Ms. MENG, Mr. LUJA ́N, Mr. 

WELCH, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. HORSFORD, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Mrs. 

AXNE, and Mr. HARDER of California) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Education relating to ‘‘Borrower Defense Institutional Accountability’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 76 IH 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Education relating to ‘‘Borrower Defense In5 stitutional Accountability’’ (84 Fed. Reg. 49788 (Sep6 tember 23, 2019)), and such rule shall have no force or 

7 effect. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
#### George E. MCDERMOTT, petitioner, v. Andrew Clifford MOORE, et al.

No. 02-579.

Jan. 13, 2003.

Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of the petition for writ of certiorari denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
IIA 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 90 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 30, 2020 

Received 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency relating 

to ‘‘Community Reinvestment Act Regulations’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HJ 90 RDS 

1 Office of the Comptroller of the Currency relating to 

2 ‘‘Community Reinvestment Act Regulations’’ (85 Fed. 

3 Reg. 34734; published June 5, 2020), and such rule shall 

4 have no force or effect. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 29, 2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Page 1

06-14-00104-CV 

IN THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS 

TEXARKANA, TEXAS 

REEF R. GILLUM, D.O., ET AL., 

 APPELLANTS, 

V. 

GREG A. GILLUM, 

 APPELLEE. 

Motion to Dismiss Appeal 

To the Honorable Sixth Court of Appeals: 

In accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), 

Appellants, through their undersigned counsel, request that the Court 

dismiss their appeal with costs taxed to the party or parties incurring same. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 

/s/ Robert B. Gilbreath 

 Robert B. Gilbreath 

 Texas State Bar No. 07904620 

Matthew C. Sapp 

 Texas State Bar No. 24063563 

 HAWKINS PARNELL 

 THACKSTON & YOUNG, LLP 

 

ACCEPTED

06-14-00104-CV

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

4/7/2015 10:05:23 AM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 4/7/2015 10:05:23 AM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
Page 2

 Highland Park Place 

 4514 Cole Avenue, Suite 500 

 Dallas, Texas 75205 

 Telephone: (214) 780-5100 

 Facsimile: (214) 780-5200 

 

COUNSEL FOR APPELLANTS

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE 

I spoke with Jim Bullock, counsel for Greg Gillum, regarding this 

motion. He was unable to reach his client regarding this motion before the 

time of filing. 

 /s/ Matthew C. Sapp 

 Matthew C. Sapp 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

On April 7, 2015, a true and correct copy of this notice was sent via email and certified mail to the following counsel of record: 

Jim E. Bullock, Esq. 

 Beard and Harris, PC 

 100 Independence Place, Suite 101 

 Tyler, Texas 75703 

jim@beardandharris.com

 

 /s/ Matthew C. Sapp 

 Matthew C. Sapp
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







The
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of ABC Funding, Inc. (the “Company”),
does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) of the Company
for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:  February
      12, 2009
            
            /s/  Robert P. MunnRobert
      P. MunnPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
391 A.2d 708

#### Jury et ux. v. Shawville Coal Company, Appellant.

Submitted April 10, 1978.

Stuart J. Horner, Jr., for appellant; James A. Naddeo, and Belin, Belin & Naddeo, for appellees.

Judgment affirmed.

PRICE, J., dissented.