alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Leslie A.Blodgett , Chief Executive Officer, and I, Myles B. McCormick, Chief FinancialOfficer, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that theQuarterly Report of Bare Escentuals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended April 1, 2007, fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 14,2007
|        | By:    | /s/ LESLIE A. BLODGETT                                                                  |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Leslie A. Blodgett                                                                      |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer and Director                                                    |
|   | By:    | /s/ MYLES B. MCCORMICK                                                                  |
|   |   | Myles B. McCormick                                                                      |
|   |   | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,  Chief Operations Officer and Secretary |

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosuredocument.

----
**Exhibit 35.1**

**Servicer Compliance Statement of John Deere Capital Corporation**

​

I, Katrin Watkins, Assistant Secretary of John Deere Capital Corporation, state:

​

A review of John Deere Capital Corporation’s activities for the period from June 18, 2024 (the date of issuance of the John Deere Owner Trust 2024-B transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation AB) through October 27, 2024 (the “Reporting Period”) and of John Deere Capital Corporation’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 18, 2024 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables LLC and John Deere Owner Trust 2024-B has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, John Deere Capital Corporation has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

​

​

| ​                | ​                        | ​              |
|------------------------|--------------------------------|----------------------|
| Date: January 10, 2025 | John Deere Capital Corporation |
| ​                | ​                        | ​              |
| ​                | By:                            | */s/ Katrin Watkins* |
| ​                | ​                        | Katrin Watkins       |
| ​                | ​                        | Assistant Secretary  |
| ​                | ​                        | ​              |
| ​                | ​                        | ​              |
|                        | ​                        | ​              |

​

----
Exhibit 31.2

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, Patrick McGrath, the Chief Financial Officer of Furio Resources Inc., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Furio Resources Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date: January 9, 2006



/s/ Patrick McGrath

Name: Patrick McGrath

Title: Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 10 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 10

  Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol to honor the last 
 surviving Medal of Honor recipient of the Second World War upon death.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2019

 Mrs. Miller submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol to honor the last 
 surviving Medal of Honor recipient of the Second World War upon death.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. HONORING LAST SURVIVING MEDAL OF HONOR RECIPIENT OF SECOND 
              WORLD WAR.

    (a) Use of Rotunda.--At the election of the individual (or next of 
kin of the individual), the last individual to die who was awarded the 
Medal of Honor for acts performed during World War II shall be 
permitted to lie in honor in the rotunda of the Capitol upon death.
    (b) Implementation.--The Architect of the Capitol, under the 
direction and supervision of the President pro tempore of the Senate 
and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, shall take the 
necessary steps to implement subsection (a) upon the death of the 
individual described in such subsection.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 2, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00405

- CR

Barry William UHR

, Appell ant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR7090 Honorable Stephanie R. Boyd , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The trial cour t impose d sentence in the underlying cause on May 4, 2020. Because appellant timely filed a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed August 3,

2020. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on August 18, 2020. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.3. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on August 12, 2011, but appellant did not file a motion for extension of time.

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. See

O livo v. Stat e , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). A late notice of appeal may be considered timely so as to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction if (1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing, (2) a motion for extens ion of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, and (3) the court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time. See i d

. Having reviewed the record,

i t appears that the notice of appeal was untimely filed, and no motion for extension of time was

filed. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing no later than September 17,

202 0 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See i d .; see als o Ate r v. Eighth Court of Appeal s , 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (out

- of

- time appeal from final felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure)

. I f appellant does not timely respond, this appeal will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of September, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
**
**Exhibit 21.1**

**Subsidiaries of Crane Company**

The following sets forth the subsidiaries of Crane Company and their jurisdictions of incorporation. 

 

**Name of Subsidiary**
  
**Jurisdiction of Organization**

“CPI-Kiev” LLC
  Ukraine
Armature d.o.o.
  Slovenia
Barksdale GmbH
  Germany
Barksdale, Inc.
  Delaware
CR Holdings C.V.
  Netherlands
Crane (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd.
  Singapore
Crane Aerospace, Inc.
  Delaware
Crane Australia Pty. Ltd.
  Australia
Crane Canada Co.
  Canada
Crane ChemPharma & Energy Corp.
  Delaware
Crane Composites Ltd.
  United Kingdom
Crane Composites, Inc.
  Delaware
Crane Controls, Inc.
  Delaware
Crane Electronics Corporation
  Taiwan
Crane Electronics, Inc.
  Delaware
Crane Fengqiu (Zhejiang) Pump Company Limited
  China (4.9%)
Crane Fluid & Gas Systems (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.
  China
Crane Global Holdings S.L.
  Spain
Crane Holdings (Germany) GmbH
  Germany
Crane Instrumentation & Sampling PFT Corp.
  Delaware
Crane International Capital S.a.r.l.
  Luxembourg
Crane International Holdings, Inc.
  Delaware
Crane International Trading (Beijing) Co. Ltd.
  China
Crane Ltd.
  United Kingdom
Crane Middle East & Africa FZE
  UAE
Crane Netherlands Holdings B.V.
  Netherlands
Crane Ningjin Valve Co., Ltd.
  China
Crane Nuclear PFT Corp.
  Delaware
Crane Overseas, LLC
  Delaware
Crane Pension Trustee Company (UK) Limited
  United Kingdom
Crane Process Flow Technologies (India) Pvt. Ltd.
  India
Crane Process Flow Technologies GmbH
  Germany
Crane Process Flow Technologies Ltd.
  United Kingdom
Crane Process Flow Technologies S.P.R.L.
  Belgium
Crane Process Flow Technologies S.r.l.
  Italy
Crane Pumps & Systems PFT Corp.
  Delaware**

Crane Resistoflex GmbH
  Germany
Crane Saudi Limited Liability Company
  Saudi Arabia
Crane SC Holdings Ltd.
  United Kingdom
Crane Stockham Valve Ltd.
  United Kingdom
Crane Supply Co.
  Canada
Crane Yongxiang (Ningbo) Valve Company Ltd.
  China (4.9%)
Croning Livarna d.o.o.
  Slovenia
Delta Fluid Products Ltd.
  United Kingdom
Dopak PFT Corp.
  Texas
Dovianus B.V.
  Netherlands
ELDEC Aerospace Corp.
  Washington
ELDEC France S.A.R.L
  France
Flow Technology Inc.
  Ohio
Hydro-Aire Aerospace Corp.
  California
Interpoint U.K. Limited
  United Kingdom
Merrimac Industries, Inc.
  Delaware
Noble Composites, Inc.
  Indiana
P.T. Crane Indonesia
  Indonesia (51%)
Terminal Manufacturing II Corp.
  Delaware
Unidynamics / Phoenix, Inc.
  Delaware
W.T. Armatur GmbH
  Germany
Westlock Controls Corporation
  Delaware
Xomox Chihuahua S.A. de C.V.
  Mexico
Xomox Corporation de Venezuela C.A.
  Venezuela
Xomox France S.A.S.
  France
Xomox Hungary Manufacturing Limited Liability Company
  Hungary
Xomox International GmbH & Co. OHG
  Germany
Xomox Japan Ltd.
  Japan
Xomox Korea Ltd.
  South Korea
Xomox PFT Corp.
  Delaware
Xomox Sanmar Ltd.
  India (49%)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1322

MCELROY COAL COMPANY,

Petitioner,

v.

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED 

STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; ROGER D. KENNEDY,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. 

(13-0592 BLA)

Submitted: November 30, 2015 Decided: December 11, 2015

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey R. Soukup, Kevin M. McGuire, Williams S. Mattingly, 

JACKSON KELLY PLLC, Lexington, Kentucky, for Petitioner. M. 

Patricia Smith, Solicitor of Labor, Rae Ellen James, Associate 

Solicitor, Gary K. Stearman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, 

Washington, D.C.; Anne Megan Davis, Thomas E. Johnson, JOHNSON, 

JONES, SNELLING, GILBERT & DAVIS, P.C., Chicago, Illinois, for 

Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

McElroy Coal Company seeks review of the Benefits Review 

Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law 

judge’s award of living miner benefits to former miner Roger D. 

Kennedy, pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2012) and its 

subsequent order denying reconsideration. Our review of the 

record discloses that the ALJ’s decision is based upon 

substantial evidence and that the Board’s decision is without 

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
[No. 34509-5-I.

Division One.

August 12, 1996.]

#### Larry Fox, et al., *Respondents,*v. Maria T. Thomas, et al., *Defendants,*The Noble Lady, Inc., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Skag-it County, No. 93-2-01124-8, Hon George E. McIntosh, J., entered March 31, 1996. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Baker, C.J., concurred in by Webster and Cox, JJ.
# C_2004106EN.01003102.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/31

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf of 17 February 2004 in proceedings between MEDION AG and THOMSON multimedia Sales Germany & Austria GmbH

(Case C-120/04)

(2004/C 106/55)

The Oberlandesgericht (Higher Regional Court) Düsseldorf, on the basis of its decision of 17 February 2004, received at the Court's Registry on 5 March 2004, in the proceedings pending before that court between MEDION AG and THOMSON multimedia Sales Germany & Austria GmbH, refers to the Court of Justice for the European Communities for a preliminary ruling the following question:

Is Article 5(1)(b) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC (1) of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ 1989 L 40, p.1; hereinafter ‘the Trade Mark Directive’) to be interpreted as meaning that there is a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public owing to the identity of the goods or services covered by competing signs in a case where an earlier word mark with normal distinctiveness is reproduced in a later composite word sign belonging to a third party, or in a word or figurative sign belonging to a third party that is characterised by parts of a word, in such a way that the third party's company name is placed in front of the earlier mark and the earlier mark, though not alone characterising the overall impression conveyed by the composite sign, has an independent distinctive role within the composite sign?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1989 L 40, p.1

1

---
#### Thomas H. LIGHT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dan CRONIN, Manager of Safety and Excise, and Ex-Officio Sheriff of the City and County of Denver; and Wayne E. Patterson, Warden of the Jail of the City and County of Denver, State of Colorado, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 79SA121.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Dec. 8, 1980.

Jeffrey C. Bluth, Denver, for petitioner-appellant.

J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Hennessey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Mary J. Mullarkey, Sol. Gen., Mary E. Ricketson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for respondents-appellees.

ERICKSON, Justice.

A hearing on a writ of habeas corpus formulated -the issues in this extradition proceeding. The district court discharged the writ, and ordered that the petitioner, Thomas H. Light, be extradited to Pennsylvania. The petitioner appeals. We affirm.

The petitioner was charged with being a fugitive from justice, when he fled from Pennsylvania after he was charged with committing the Pennsylvania statutory crimes of conspiracy, robbery, theft by unlawful taking, and reckless endangerment on or about May 1, 1978. Section 16-19-103, C.R.S. 1973.

Thereafter, he was arrested in Denver, Colorado, and counsel was appointed. Requisition documents were subsequently submitted by the Governor of Pennsylvania. Petitioner’s counsel obtained a writ of habe-as corpus, which was discharged after a full hearing. The sole error raised on appeal relates to the issue of identity. The petitioner asserts that the requisition documents must establish probable cause to believe that he committed the crimes charged. *Renton v. Cronin,*196 Colo. 109, 582 P.2d 677 (1978). We agree with his statement of the law. However, in this case the record is sufficient to show that he was the same Thomas H. Light referred to in the requisition documents.

First, the issuance of a governor’s warrant by the governor of the asylum state creates a presumption that the person sought to be extradited was in the demanding state at the time the crime was committed. The burden then shifts to the person *310whose extradition is sought to show by clear and convincing evidence that he was not in the demanding state at the time the crime was committed. *Allen v. Cronin,*189 Colo. 540, 543 P.2d 707 (1976). A *prima facie*showing of identity is made when the name of the person is identical to that appearing in the requisition documents. Thereafter, the petitioner must shoulder the burden of disproving the *prima facie*showing of identity. *Samples v. Cronin,*189 Colo. 40, 536 P.2d 306 (1975). At the hearing on the writ of habeas corpus, the petitioner remained silent, and no evidence supports his contention that he is not the Thomas H. Light sought by Pennsylvania. *Dominguez v. Bray,*188 Colo. 72, 532 P.2d 950 (1975); *Dilworth v. Leach,*183 Colo. 206, 515 P.2d 1130 (1973).

The remaining issues raised by the petitioner are without merit.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court.
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







The
undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of ABC Funding, Inc. (the “Company”),
does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November
      19, 2008
            
            /s/  Carl A. ChaseCarl
      A. ChaseChief
      Financial Officer and
              (Principal
      Accounting and Financial Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# C_2004094EN.01003607.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/36

---

Removal from the register of Case C-167/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 94/103)

By order of 19 January 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case C-167/03: Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic.

---

(1)  OJ C 158 of 5.07.2003.

1

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 9, 2015

No. 04-15-00206-CV

IN RE Tamer F. MORSI

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On April 8, 2015, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered 

relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, 

the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion 

will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on April 9, 2015.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011-CI-15236, styled In the Interest of E.M., G.M. and L.M., Children, 

pending in the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Renee Yanta presiding.