alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meetings.

The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Eye Institute Special  Emphasis Panel, NEI Loan Repayment Program.                     

*Date:*                         April 26-27, 2012.                     

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 8 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate loan repayment program applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Eye Institute,  National Institutes of Health,  5635 Fishers Lane,                               ( print page 22582)                             Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                     

*Contact Person:*                         Brian Hoshaw, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, MSC 9300, 301-451-2020,                         *hoshawb@mail.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 10, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-9087 Filed 4-13-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7190

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. GREGORY W. BURWELL, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge (3:03-cr-00203-REP-1; 3:03-cv-00274-REP)

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 23, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory W. Burwell, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gregory W. Burwell seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Burwell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 4.1



 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


June 16, 2022


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 2117


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


240 Greenwich Street, 22W Floor


New York, NY 10286


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 2117 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined the Registration
Statement File No. 333-263693 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement of the references
to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 





	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ ALEX R. MEITZNER
	 	 	Alex R. Meitzner
	 	 	Senior Vice President
I•••.:...nrg:....I.-.IJanuary25,2016Mr.GuyR.DonaldsonU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency-Region61445RossAvenue,Suite1200Dallas,TX75202-2733Re:Supplemental502ModelingAnalysisNRGParishandLimestonePlantsDearMr.Donaldson:NRGTexasPowerLLC("NRG")respectfullyofferstheenclosedmaterialssupplementingourpriordemonstrationthattheW.A.ParishandLimestonepowerplantsdonotcauseorcontributetoviolationsofthe1-hourS02nationalambientairqualitystandard("NAAQS").NRGisasubsidiaryofNRGEnergy,Inc.,aFortune250companyandoneofthecountry'slargestpowergenerationandretailelectricitybusinesses.NRGEnergy'spowerplantsprovideabout52,000megawattsofgenerationcapacityanditsretailbusinessesservemorethan3millioncustomersthroughoutthecountry.InSoutheastTexas,NRGownsmorethan11,000MWofgenerationcapacityfromnineelectricgeneratingstations.NRGsupportscleanenergyresourcesandtechnologiescriticaltoourtransitiontoasustainable,lowcarbonsociety.Weappreciatetheopportunitytomakethissubmittal.Asdescribedintheattachedreport,NRGbelievesthatwehaveaddressedfeedbackfromEPAstaffregardingourpriorS02demonstrationfortheParishandLimestoneplants.Wehavealsoconfirmedthestackheightsandothercharacteristicsthatshouldbeusedforairqualitymodelingrelatingtotheseplants.TheserefinementsandchangescontinuetodemonstratethattheareasaroundtheParishandLimestoneplantsareinfactcompliantwiththe1-hourS02NAAQSandshouldbedesignatedattainment.Thisviewisconsistentwiththeresultsofmultiplereasonableairqualitymodelingscenariosforeachplant.Asalsodescribedintheattachedreport,NRGhasalsoreviewedandevaluatedtheadditionalinformationprovidedtoEPAbytheSierraClubrelatingtotheParishplant.OuranalysissuggeststhatanyofavarietyofappropriatecorrectionsorrefinementstotheSierraClub'smodelingservestofurtherconfirmthattheairaroundParishiscleanandcompliantwiththeS02NAAQS.WerespectfullydisagreewiththeJanuary2016submittalinwhichtheSierraClubsuggeststhatourairqualitymodelingisinsufficienttodemonstratecompliance.{00140737.1/LTR}-1-NRGappreciatesyourconsiderationofthisinformation.PleasecontactCraigEckbergat832-357-5291orcraig.eckberg@nrg.comifyouhaveanyquestionsorrequireadditionalinformation.Sincerely,AirProgramManagerGulfCoastRegioncc:Attachment{00140737.1/LTR}-2-
TDCJ Offender Details JO^D! Page 1of 2

Wb^midJ^JMJWMIMIIEIlSillAM TDCJ Home Kfl New Offender Search O

Offender Information Details

Return to Search list

SID Number:

TDCJ Number:

Name:

Race:

Gender:

DOB:

Maximum Sentence Date:

Current Facility:

Projected Release Date:

Parole Eligibility Date:

Offender Visitation Eligible:

03437244

01920931

WOLF.DWIGHT

B

M

1966-04-13

2033-08-01

BOYD

2033-08-01

2023-08-01

YES

Information provided is updated once daily during weekdaysand multiple timesper day

on visitation days. Because this information is subject to change, family members and

friends are encouraged to call the unit prior to traveling for a visit.

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE:

Scheduled Release Date:

Scheduled Release Type:

Scheduled Release Location:

Offender is not scheduled for release at this time.

Will be determined when release date is scheduled.

Will be determined when release date is scheduled.

Parole Review Information

Offense History:

Offense

Date

1989-05-04

Offense

BAIL JUMPING/FAILURE TO

APPEAR

Sentence nn„nhl Case Sentence (YY- Date ^ounty No. MM-DD)

1998-08-10 WALLER 6157 4-00-00

http://offender.tdcj.state.tx.us/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.acti6n?sid=03437244 4/10/2015
June 29, 2015 

Z.P. Le Roux

101 Silverado Drive

Madison, AL 35758

Dear Z.P. Le Roux:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§ xx.xx of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 25, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

2182), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
6/26/2015 Regulations.gov ­ Other Document

http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA­2015­2182­0001 1/2

Zach le Roux - Petition for Exemption

This Other document was issued by the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA)

For related information, Open Docket Folder

Content

Z.P. le Roux

101 Silverado Drive

Madison AL 35758

Attachments (1)

Comment Now!

ID: FAA­2015­2182­0001

Document Information

Date Posted:

Jun 25, 2015

Show More Details

Submitter Information

Submitter Name:

Anonymous Anonymous

Comments

0

Docket Information

This document is contained in

FAA­2015­2182

Related Dockets:

None

Related RINs:

None

Related Documents:

None

This count refers to the total

comment/submissions received on

this document, as of 11:59 PM

yesterday. Note: Agencies review

all submissions, however some

agencies may choose to redact, or

withhold, certain submissions (or

View Attachment:

Zach le Roux - Petition for Exemption

Comments Received*

*
Discussions

Mara Whitaker, Agricultural Marketing Specialist

Mara.Whitaker@usda.gov

DAIRY, GRAINS, AND OILSEEDS BRANCH

Proteins, Grain, and Oilseeds Procurement Division

USDA/AMS/CPP
Advance Shipment Notices

• Advanced Shipment Notices (ASN) are required by 4A52.211-80 

Advance Shipment Notice (ASN) and Unloading Appointment 

(June 2021) in the Master Solicitation for Commodity 

Procurement-Domestic Programs (Master).

• The Master is available at Purchase Programs: Solicitations & 

Awards | Agricultural Marketing Service (usda.gov).
Advance Shipment Notices

ASN entry is a contractual requirement. The Master indicates:

• Contractor shall enter a WBSCM advanced shipment notice (ASN) on or 

before the date of shipment.

• Contractors are encouraged to create the ASN for the purchase order item 

number as soon as a delivery appointment has been scheduled, but not 

less than 24 hours. 
Advance Shipment Notices 1

Advanced shipment notices shall contain: 

• Shipper’s name 

• Commodity 

• Sales Order or Requisition Number (SO or RN) 

• Units per (SO or RN) 

• Destination 

• Purchase Order Number 

• Ship date 

• Mode of transportation. If truck, anticipated date of arrival. 

Please enter an ASN using the actual ship date and not the final Not-Later-Than date of the 

contracted delivery period.

•
Advance Shipment Notices 2

• The ASN alerts the recipient agency that the product will be shipped. 

• Delivered product cannot be used in USDA Food Assistance 

distributions without the ASN in WBSCM.

• The ASN is the initial step in the eINV process.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of INverso Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, William A. Hartman, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November
      23, 2009
            /s/  William
      A. HartmanBy:  William
      A.  HartmanIts:  Chief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
INverso Corp. and will be retained by INverso Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than May 1, 2012.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Richard Walker, Community Affairs Officer) P.O. Box 55882, Boston, Massachusetts 02106-2204:

                    1.                     *Kevin P. Meehan, Millis, Massachusetts;*                     to acquire up to 53.18 percent of the outstanding shares of the common stock of MNB Bancorp, Milford, Massachusetts, and thereby acquire shares of The Milford National Bank and Trust Company, Milford, Massachusetts.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 13, 2012.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2012-9322 Filed 4-17-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Page 1of 1



### Janet 

### Travis From: "Patricia Mariella" <Patricia.Mariella@gric.nsn.us> To: "Daniel Blair (E-mail)"<air@gilanet.net>; "janet travis (E-mail)" <jtravis@gilanet.net>; "Leroy W~lliams (E-mail)"<williams@gilanet.net>; "Margaret Cook (E-mail)" <Margaret.Cook@gric.nsn.us>;"Russell Betsuie (E-mail)" <Rbetsuie@gilanet.net>; "Willard Antone (E-mail)" <wantone3@gilanet,net> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 3:30 PM Subject: REvised Transcript Team, I revised/filled in all my speaking sections ofthe transcript and a few others (likethe introductions). I expandedthe heading and put a date on the top 

### - ifyou make changes please changes the date and up the 'revisions' number (the one I 

### am forwarding to you says revision 1). 

### I also editing/filled-in Kevin Gover's statements. I also single spacedthe document so it is only 9 pages long now. I highly recommend using the foot control when doing any editing. It really saves frustration and time. I'm givingthe tapes to Daniel next 

### - would you fill in your comments and any additional ones for the facilities that you can figure out. Then Janet 

## - would you make sure that all the names are spelled correctly compared to the sign in sheet and that everyone who was there got listed 

### - because I didn't seethe names of any ofthe young women lawyers that Michelle DeBlasibrought with her, listed on the transcripttho I'm pretty surethey introduced themselves. Lastly, Janet,Daniel or someone else 

### - please double check Fred, Lori, JoeIChris and Lori's husband comments and fill in or correct as necessary. Then we're done. Thanks Pat 

### M
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A0785. CLARETHA ROSS v. THE STATE.

Claretha Ross was convicted of theft by deception and sentenced as a recidivist

to twenty years, to serve ten in prison and the remainder on probation. We affirmed

her conviction and sentence. Ross v. State, 298 Ga. App. 525 (680 SE2d 435) (2009).

Rosslater filed a “Motion to Modify andCorrect an Unlawful and Unconstitutionally

Imposed Sentence.” The trial court denied the motion, and Ross appealed. We

dismissed the appeal, finding thatRoss did notraise a valid void-sentence claim. Ross

v. State, Case No. A14A0379 (dismissed Nov. 1, 2013). Ross subsequently filed

another “Motion to Void Convictions and Sentence,” arguing once again that her

conviction is void and her sentence is unconstitutional. On October 21, 2014, the trial

court denied this motion, and Ross filed a pro se notice of appeal from that order on

November 24, 2014. We lack jurisdiction for two reasons.

First, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of the

appealable order. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice 

of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. See Rowland

v. State, 264 Ga. 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Because Ross filed her notice of

appeal 34 days after entry of the trial court’s order, her appeal is untimely.

Second, an appeal from an order denying or dismissing a challenge to an

allegedly void conviction is subject to dismissal. See Williams v. State, 287 Ga. 192

(695 SE2d 244) (2010). A direct appeal may lie from the denial of a motion to correct

a void sentence if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is void. See

Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). A sentence is void only

when the trial court imposes a punishment that the law does not allow; assertions

March 23, 2015
taking issue with the procedure employed in imposing the sentence do not constitute

colorable void-sentence claims. See Coleman v. State, 305 Ga. App. 680 (700 SE2d

668) (2010). Here, Ross does not allege any void sentence claim. As in her prior

motion, she takes issue with the procedure employed in seeking recidivist

punishment. Because Ross does not raise a valid void-sentence claim, this appeal is

hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/23/2015