alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 9, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00264-CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, DIVISION OF WORKERS’

COMPENSATION, Appellant

V.

LINDA GREEN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 133rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-25688

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed March 2, 2015. The appeal was 

assigned to the First Court of Appeals; however, the Harris County District Clerk 

subsequently, and erroneously, assigned this cause to this court. By letter dated, 

March 24 2015, the Harris County District Clerk advised this court of its error. 

Because this cause was erroneously assigned to this court, the appeal is ordered 
2

dismissed. Our dismissal does not affect any appeal pending in the First Court of 

Appeals.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Busby and Brown.
EXHIBIT
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
      OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I,
      Mark Pettie,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Prestige Brands
      Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable, and that information contained in such
      Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Prestige Brands Holdings,
      Inc.




/s/Mark
                PettieName:  Mark
                PettieTitle:
                Chief
                Executive OfficerDate:
                February 8,
                2008
| (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of                  15 (d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                        |                                                                                                                                                      |   |
|---------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: August                  22, 2005 |                                                                                                                                                      |   |
|                                        | Harvey                    W. SchillerChairman of the Board and Chief Executive                    Officer(Principal Executive                    Officer) |

----
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IASIS Healthcare LLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ W. Carl WhitmerW. Carl WhitmerChief Financial Officer
\"r> ^\"\-^i^ WdO(9\Q^q\v£ U> ^Vv

f\ ,61 I -02.

^T RECEIVED

60URT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

lo^ ,' !2yrv ^^T^?vO ~\Lco>-a \>^OrajsL APR 06 2015

CL/Ls^ V^o vpt^- ^f\ pp\\ - o'X

a^s5 V^JD , ^->JE>\\^V-rao\^(r> - <S^ Ai3eJAcosta,Cterk

*\~ Wy^=: \-~i^\r\rv5ty^ ^c^

fe^

^W>\\>A£; "^^eXMlrSl 1<L">\\Xoh:> °\Q ^

^Ljcyo^^scL2SV<sa?v^>> "XWii -"\r ^^>^vs^>

\>v?_C^C>WxvjA^^^^^
V«N^p~^"<^\ 1

M Cs>V

SL**^> c -CXO*

V4d?^ !>CV^^^_e^_^^__^oAS °\ \Nf\cDv^>\>^s \^cck^(^

^ J

£aO->_VjAr>

00_£>^<^£^^_^^ACb-

^_

^v£_ feJ ^sW?&U

^sO—^cs\> CLoOaAr- -t JeCJkiav,
2^J^X^^sMX_

Si^XS^vsQX~\^p Vwn./ ^"^

-Ju>S70Wvn\ ^YvaY^^S

^1S^K\
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA F I L E D

APR -3 205
AFAF AZEH, ) Clerk, U.S. District and
) Bankruptcy Courts
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No.
)
RANDOLPH, BOYD, CHERRY AND VAUGHN, )
)
Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and

her pro se civil complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed.-

The Court has reviewed plaintiff's complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by
pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted
by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however,
must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239
(D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint
contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court’s jurisdiction depends, a
short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand
for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum
standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to
prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the

doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).


Plaintiff alleges in vague terms that defendant committed an “unlawful deceptive act,”
which has caused her to be sued by the Commonwealth’s Attorney. Compl. at 1. Her pleading
neither alleges sufficient facts nor otherwise articulates a cognizable legal claim. As drafted, the
complaint does not comply with Rule 8(a), and it therefore will be dismissed. An Order

consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

DATE: Prd 3 Jos SD, V/A

[ United Sfates District Judge
IV 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 472

Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the 4–H Youth Development Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2002

Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia (for herself and Mr. SCOTT) submitted the 

following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and the Workforce 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the 4–H Youth 

Development Program.

Whereas the 4–H Youth Development Program celebrates its 

100th anniversary in 2002; 

Whereas members of the 4–H Youth Development Program 

pledge their Heads to clearer thinking, their Hearts to 

greater loyalty, their Hands to larger service, and their 

Health to better living for the club, the community, the 

country, and the world; 

Whereas the 4–H Youth Development Program sponsors 

clubs in rural and urban areas throughout the world; 

Whereas 4–H Clubs have grown to over 5,600,000 annual 

participants ranging from 5 to 19 years of age; 

Whereas 4–H Clubs strengthen families and communities; 
2

•HCON 472 IH 

Whereas 4–H Clubs foster leadership and volunteerism for 

youth and adults; 

Whereas 4–H Clubs build internal and external partnerships 

for programming and resource development; 

Whereas today’s 4–H Clubs are very diverse, offering projects 

relating to citizenship and civic education, communications and expressive arts, consumer and family sciences, 

environmental education and earth sciences, healthy lifestyle education, personal development and leadership, 

plants, animals, and science and technology; and 

Whereas the 4–H Youth Development Program continues to 

make great contributions toward the development of wellrounded youth: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress—

3 (1) recognizes the 100th anniversary of the 4–

4 H Youth Development Program and commends the 

5 program for service to the youth of the world; and 

6 (2) urges the President to issue a proclamation 

7 calling on the people of the United States to observe 

8 a ‘‘National 4–H Youth Development Program 

9 Week’’ with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 7, 2015

NO. 03-13-00643-CV

Karen Neyland, Susan Sinclair, Phyllis Watts, and Connie Causin, Appellants

v.

Nancy Thompson, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND DISMISSED IN PART --

OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN;

CONCURRING OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the interlocutory orders signed by the trial court on September 13, 2013. 

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible 

error in the court’s interlocutory orders. Therefore, the Court reverses and dismisses the portions 

of the trial court’s interlocutory orders regarding Thompson’s claims as to the email statements 

to Sunchase residents, the statement in the flyers concerning the suit and default judgment 

against Thompson, and the statements to the television reporter and renders judgment dismissing 

those claims. Having otherwise reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds 

that there was no further reversible error in the trial court’s interlocutory orders. Therefore, the
Court affirms the trial court’s interlocutory orders in all other respects. Each party shall bear 

their own costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000043609-DEC-201108:53 AM
United States Department of Agriculture

Page 1 of 2

Calculating 

Class IV Price

United States Department of Agriculture

for more details, see the next page.

Agricultural Marketing Service
Page 2 of 2

Calculating Class 

IV Price: Details

$0.1715 = Manufacturing cost to produce 1 pound of butter, excluding cost of raw milk ($/lb).

1.211 = Factor representing pounds of butter that can be made from 1 pound of butterfat (lb butter/lb butterfat).

Monthly commodity prices are announced on or before the 5th day of the following month. 

Class prices are announced as dollars per hundredweight. CWT= hundredweight, 100 pounds.

Formula Details

$0.1678 = Manufacturing cost to produce 1 pound of NFDM, excluding cost of raw milk ($/lb).

0.99 = Factor representing pounds of NFDM that can be made from 1 pound of nonfat solids 

 (lb NFDM/lb nonfat solids).

9.0 = Factor representing pounds of nonfat solids found in a standard 100 pounds of skim milk 

 (lb nonfat solids/cwt skim).

0.965 = 96.5 pounds of skim in 100 pounds of milk (cwt skim/cwt milk). 

3.5 = 3.5 pounds of butterfat in 100 pounds of milk (lb butterfat/cwt milk).

For more information on the Price Formulas, visit 

www.ams.usda.gov/resources/price-formulas

For more information on Advanced Prices & Pricing Factors and Class & Component Prices, 

visit www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/mmr/dmr

Agricultural Marketing Service, October 2019.

USDA is an equal opportunity employer, provider and lender.
#### Steinmetz *et*al. *v.*Fenness*y et*al., Appellants.

*Practice, Supreme Court*— Lower *courts*— Findings *of fact*— Con*clusions of law*— *Conclusion following findings*— *Surcharge of school directors*— Appeal—Act *May 8, 1909, P. L. 892.*

On an appeal from tbe surcharge of school directors the facts found by the lower court are not reviewable. An appeal lies only from the legal conclusions and where they logically follow the facts found the judgment will be affirmed.

Argued June 12, 1918.

Appeal, No. 366, Jan. T., 1917, by defendants, from decree of C, P. Columbia Co., surcharging defendants in case of Ferdinand Steinmetz, The Philadelphia and Reading Coal and Iron Company, the Lehigh Valley Coal Company, City of Philadelphia, Trustee under the Will of Stephen Girard, Deceased, v. William J. Fennessy, Hiram W. Watson, Martin Monahan, Anthony Mohan and Richard J. Kane, Directors of the School District of Conyngham Township1, Columbia County.

Before Brown, C. J., Moschzisker, Frazer, Walling and Simpson, JJ.

Affirmed.

Appeal from report of auditors of the school district of Conyngham Township, Columbia County. Before Evans, P. J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.

The lower court surcharged the defendants, the school directors of the said township, with the amount of the salaries paid school teachers in excess of the amount of said salaries as fixed at the beginning of the school year. Defendants appealed.

*Error assigned,*among others, was the decree of the court.

*Edward J. Flynn,*for appellants.

*R. 8. Hemingway,*with him *D. W. Kaeroher*and *Fred Iheler, for*appellees., '

*76July 17, 1918:

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from a surcharge by the appellants, school directors of Conyngham Township, Columbia County. The facts found by the court below, upon which the surcharge was based, are not reviewable, for an appeal lies only from legal conclusions in such a case: Sec. 4, Act oí May 3, 1909, P. L. 392. The legal conclusions appealed from logically followed the facts found, and, on those conclusions, the decree of the court below is affirmed, at the costs of the appellants.
MELVIN HICKS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4102

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 9, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Suwannee County.

Paul S. Bryan, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Jessica J. Yeary, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Matthew Pavese and Robert Charles Lee, 

Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
**Exhibit 35.1**

**Servicer Compliance Statement of John Deere Capital Corporation**

​

I, Katrin Watkins, Assistant Secretary of John Deere Capital Corporation, state:

​

A review of John Deere Capital Corporation’s activities for the period from September 19, 2023 (the date of issuance of the John Deere Owner Trust 2023-C transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation AB) through October 29, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”) and of John Deere Capital Corporation’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 19, 2023 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables LLC and John Deere Owner Trust 2023-C has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, John Deere Capital Corporation has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

​

​

| ​               | ​                        | ​              |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------|----------------------|
| Date: January 9, 2024 | John Deere Capital Corporation |
| ​               | ​                        | ​              |
| ​               | By:                            | */s/ Katrin Watkins* |
| ​               | ​                        | Katrin Watkins       |
| ​               | ​                        | Assistant Secretary  |
| ​               | ​                        | ​              |
| ​               | ​                        | ​              |
|                       | ​                        | ​              |

​

----
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 23
- 00441
- CR

Ron Guzman , Appellant

v. The State of Texas , Appellee

FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. CR
- 06
- 137
- A , THE HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N In July 2006, Appellant Ron Guzman pleaded guilty of one count of indecency with a child and four counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child

. See Tex. Penal Code §§ 21.11, 22.0 2 1 . The trial court sentence d him to twenty

- years’ imprisonment for the indecency offense and forty

- years’ imprisonment for each aggravated sexual assault offense to run concurrently pursuant to a plea agreement

. See id. §§ 12. 32 , 12. 33

. He appeals from the trial court’s denial of his subsequent motion for forensic DNA testing. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. arts. 64.01 (explaining when convicted person may file motion requesting testing of DNA evidence), .03 (listing requirements for convicting court to order DNA testing). Appellant’s court

- appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel along with a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and presents no arguably meritorious issues . The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.2 See 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); Garner v. State , 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 81

– 82 (1988). Appellant’s counsel has certified to this Court that he sent copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and provided a motion to assist appellant in obtaining the record. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders , 386 U.S. at 744. Appellant filed a pro se response on July 9 , 202 4. We have conducted an independent review of the record

— including the record of the Chapter 64 proceedings , appellate counsel’s brief , and appellant’s pro se response

— and find no reversible error. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744; Garner , 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe

v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

– 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review and that the appeal is frivolous. We affirm the judgment and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

__________________________________________ Darlene Byrne , Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Byrne , Justices Smith and Theofanis Affirmed Filed: August 2 3 , 2024 Do Not Publish
THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee 

) ) 

) 

AUSTIN, TEXAS 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL 

TO THE HONORABLE WSTICES OF SAID COURT: 

COMES NOW KIRKHAWKINS, attorneyofrecordforNAKIADESHAWN 

LEWIS, and respectfully requests that he be allowed to withdraw as counsel for 

Appellant, and for cause would show the Court the following: 

I. 

The undersigned attorney was unable to find any reversible error and filed a 

frivolous appellate brief on behalf of Appellant. The undersigned attorney respectfully 

requests that he be allowed to withdraw as attorney of record for Appellant. 

II. 

Appellant's current address is TDCJ # 1964121, 1210 Coryell Road, Gatesville, 

Texas 76528. Appellant has been delivered a copy of this motion by mailing same to 

Appellant at her current address. 
III. 

Appellant has been notified in writing of her right to file her own brief and to 

review the record in this case. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the undersigned attorney prays 

the Court grant this motion and allow him to withdraw as counsel of record for 

Appellant NAKIA DESHA WN LEWIS. 

E-Mail: kirkhawkinslaw@gmail.com 

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE 

I certify that on the 7 ..ft.. day of April, 2015, I spoke by telephone with Ms. 

Meagan White, Assistant District Attorney, who stated she had no objection to this 

Motion to Withdraw. ~~ 

irk Hawkins 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that a true and correct copy of the above was served on Ms. Meagan 

White, Assistant District Attorney, Tom Green County Courthouse, Court Street 

Annex, 124 West Beauregard, San Angelo, Texas 76903; and on Appellant, Ms. Nakia 

DeshawnLewis #1964121, 1210 Coryell Road, Gatesv· le, Texas 76528, on this ~ 

day of April, 2015. 

Kirk Hawkins
SERVICER
COMPLIANCE STATEMENT



Re: Daimler Truck Financial Services
USA LLC, as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2023, among
Daimler Trucks Retail Trust 2023-1, as issuer, Daimler Trucks Retail Receivables LLC, as depositor, and Daimler Truck Financial
Services USA LLC, as seller and as Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”), for the period from September 27, 2023 to
December 31, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”).



I, Gianni P. Gatto, certify that:



(a)       A
review of the Servicer’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has
been made under my supervision.



(b)       To
the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement
in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



Dated: March 28, 2024



| | By:                                                | /s/ Gianni P. Gatto
| | -------------------------------------------------- | -------------------
| | Name:  Gianni P. Gatto                            
| | Title:  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June
30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ James A. CalderJames A. CalderChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  43