alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 43 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the final rule of the Department of the Treasury, the 

Department of Labor, and the Department of Health and Human Services relating to ‘‘Short-Term, Limited-Duration Insurance’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2019 

Ms. CASTOR of Florida (for herself, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Ms. UNDERWOOD, Mr. 

DESAULNIER, Ms. MOORE, and Mr. HORSFORD) submitted the following 

joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Labor, 

and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the final rule of the 

Department of the Treasury, the Department of Labor, 

and the Department of Health and Human Services relating to ‘‘Short-Term, Limited-Duration Insurance’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of the Treasury, the Department of Labor, and 

5 the Department of Health and Human Services relating 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 43 IH 

1 to ‘‘Short-Term, Limited-Duration Insurance’’ (published 

2 at 83 Fed. Reg. 38212 (August 3, 2018)), and such rule 

3 shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

MARK M. FISHER,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 492 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
## **Exhibit 31.2**

**Section302 Certification**

I, Patrick M. Fox,certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Seneca Gaming Corporation;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)           Discussedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)           Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: May 15, 2007 | /s/ Patrick M. Fox            |
|--------------------|-------------------------------|
|               | Patrick M. Fox                |
|               | Chief Financial Officer       |
|               | (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
Warehouses with Loan Cotton in Open Yard Storage

Warehouse Code Warehouse Name Location (City, State) Loan Inventory Current Loan Bales in 

Open Yard

840513 Gulf Compress Corpus Christi, TX 32146 0

Note: Quantities are based on latest information available

December 18, 2019
EXHIBIT 32.1













CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of ZAGG Inc (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert G. Pedersen II, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ROBERT G. PEDERSEN IIRobert G. Pedersen II

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

January 27, 2012




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
August 2, 2011 

VENTURA 

The Honorable F^ay LaHood 

Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

Washington D.C, 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

i:-a 

m-H m 

c 

This letter is sent to you to indicate my support of the application of Ventura County/Oxnard 

Airport for a grant in the 2011 Small Community Air Service Development Program. The grant 

is requested to provide an incentive for new air sen/ice from Oxnard Airport to Las Vegas, NV 

with SeaPort Airlines. 

The Oxnard Airport has had continuous passenger air service since 1946 and, unfortunately, 

United Express terminated its scheduled air service on June 8"^ of 2010 leaving Oxnard Airport 

with no air service. The loss of air service has a significant impact on our business. Our only 

option is to now drive to either Burbank Airport or Los Angeles International Airport. The drive 

on the freeways from Ventura County is long and very congested. It can easily take over two 

hours to get to either airport. 

I understand th^t Ventura County Department of Airports management has had meetings with 

SeaPort Airlines about providing nonstop service to Las Vegas. We are in support of this type 

of air service and believe it will be an important link to connections to other areas. We believe 

that if SeaPort jAirlines is successful at Oxnard Airport, they will add more flights to other 

markets and other airtines will come to our airport with nonstop sen/ice to other regional hub 

airports. 

Our community needs air service at Oxnard Airport and this will be a good start. I strongly 

support the application otVentura County/Oxnard Airport for a grant under this program and will 

support the new air service. 

Sincerely, / 

/ 

/ 

Jeffr^y^^bert, AlCP 

Corr^CRunity Development Director 

5QI Poll Street •jR O. Box 99 • Veniura, CalJibcma 93002 0099 805.654.7800 • cilyorvenlura.net
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 - 2498 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION June 25, 2012 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with Ford and To yot a, on May 2 2, 2012 , to discuss large truck metrics FROM: Don Kopinski , US EPA TO: EPA Docket # EPA - HQ - OAR - 2010 - 0799 EPA staff met with representatives of Ford and Toyota on May 2 2, 2012. The meeting was held at EPA’s NVFE L facility in Ann Arbor, to discuss Ford and To yot a comments on how best to define strong and mild hy brids in the context of the large hy brid truck credit program, outlined in the EPA/NHTSA Proposed Rulemaking fo r Greenhouse Gas and CAFE Standards for Model Year 2017 - 2025 Light - Duty Vehicles . EPA presented results of its testing of a Silverado 1500 hy brid electric vehicle. Ford attendees were Elisa Werthman, Nancy Homeister, Phil L echowicz , and Mark Jennings. To yota attendees were Matt Kevnick and (on phone) Rick Gezelle . EPA attendees were Ben Ellies, Ed Nam, Don Kopinski, Joe McDonald, James Sanchez, and Bill Charmley .
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o

. 0 9

- 2 0 5 6 8 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A
,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v

.

M I G U E L A N G E L A L F O N S O

- P E R E Z , a l s o k n o w n a s M i g u e l A n g e l A l f o n s o , a l s o k n o w n a s M i g u e l A l f o n s o P e r e z , a l s o k n o w n a s M i g u e l A n g e l P e r e z A l f o n s o , a l s o k n o w n a s M i g u e l A n g e l P e r e z , a l s o k n o w n a s M i g u e l A n g e l A l f o n s o P e r e z ,

D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o

. 4 : 0 8

- C R

- 7 7 2

- 1

B e f o r e J O L L Y , S T E W A R T , a n d O W E N , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

. P E R C U R I A M : *

T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t M i g u e l A n g e l A l f o n s o

P e r e z h a s m o v e d f

o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h

A n d e r s v

. C a l i f

o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. A l f o n s o

- P e r e z h a s n o t f i l e d a

r e s p o n s e

. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o

n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 22 , 20 10
Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-20568 Document: 00511150201 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010N o

. 0 9

- 2 0 5 6 8

w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n ,

a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

.

2 Case: 09-20568 Document: 00511150201 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/22/2010
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cellu Tissue
Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the three months ended May 27, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Senior Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies that:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrants.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ DAVID J. MORRIS                                       
|David J. Morris                                           
|Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief
Financial Officer
|July 9, 2010
Manufactured Home Shipments Most Recent 12 Months (August 2013 through July 2014 )

State Single Wides Multi Wides Total Floors AL 1092 1346 2438 3820 FL 971 2452 3423 5944 GA 451 1026 1477 2511 HI 0 3 3 7 LA 2628 1614 4242 5921 MS 1189 1302 2491 3835 SC 848 1247 2095 3357 TX 7707 5840 13547 19450 AR 619 811 1430 2253 AZ 304 832 1136 1998 CA 293 2,142 2,435 4,716 KS 183 191 374 568 KY 920 1,305 2,225 3,537 MO 413 468 881 1,349 NC 1,269 1,327 2,596 3,927 NM 482 587 1,069 1,666 OK 809 832 1,641 2,478 TN 751 1,213 1,964 3,183 AK 37 4 41 45 CO 561 279 840 1,120 CT 53 41 94 135 DE 110 195 305 505 IA 217 105 322 427 ID 86 209 295 525 IL 534 340 874 1,219 IN 640 282 922 1,204 MA 60 89 149 240 MD 149 84 233 317 ME 177 180 357 536 MI 1,030 695 1,725 2,420 MN 219 181 400 582 MT 252 162 414 585 ND 412 363 775 1,149 NE 74 50 124 174 NH 102 183 285 466 NJ 101 114 215 329 NV 48 178 226 419 NY 576 800 1,376 2,178 OH 550 442 992 1,434 OR 193 644 837 1,538 PA 515 769 1,284 2,056 RI 3 4 7 11 SD 264 165 429 595 UT 39 150 189 345

Page 1 of 2Manufactured Home Shipments Most Recent 12 Months (August 2013 through July 2014 ) VA 514 562 1,076 1,639 VT 67 71 138 209 WA 83 603 686 1,371 WI 156 108 264 372 WV 359 730 1,089 1,820 WY 139 79 218 295 Canada 1 0 1 1 Destination Pending 126 101 227 330

Grand Total 29,376 33,500 62,876 97,111

Note that this data represents state of first destination and may not be final state of installation and occupancy.

Page 2 of 2
#### KENAI ELKS LODGE, # 2425, Appellant, v. HOTEL AND RESTAURANT LOCAL UNION # 878, Anchorage Hotel and Restaurant Employees Welfare Fund & Alaska Hotel & Restaurant Pension Fund, Appellees.

No. 4365.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

April 25, 1980.

*11Albert Maffei, Maffei, Inc., Anchorage, for appellant.

Randall Simpson, Jermain, Dunnagan & Owens, Anchorage, for appellees.

Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., CONNOR, BOOCHEVER and MATTHEWS, JJ., and SOUTER, Judge [sitting as supreme court justice].

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

At issue here is the liability of the appellant as an employer of hotel and restaurant workers for underpayment of health and welfare benefits to the Anchorage Hotel and Restaurant Employees Health and Welfare Fund plus liquidated damages and an accounting fee. The total principal amount in controversy is $3,932.18 plus costs and attorney’s fees. Judge Kalamarides found that there were no genuine issues of material fact and that appellees were entitled to judgment as a matter of law and he therefore entered summary judgment for appel-lees.

The following portion of the trial court’s opinion adequately answers the only arguably meritorious points raised by appellant:

> Defendants have raised the defense generally that the union has failed to furnish qualified employees to the Defendant upon request. Matters between the employer and the union do not directly affect matters between the employer and the trust funds. Defenses based upon alleged failure of consideration have generally been rejected. *Lewis v. Benedict Coal Corp.,*361 U.S. 459, 80 S.Ct. 489, 4 L.Ed.2d 442 (1960). *Lewis v. Quality Coal Corp.,*270 F.2d 140 (7th Cir. 1959), *cert. denied,*361 U.S. 929, 80 S.Ct. 369, 4 L.Ed.2d 353 (1960). Defendant additionally alleges that health and welfare benefits do not apply to the non-union employees of Defendant, so that payment of said benefits to the Plaintiff would constitute an unjust enrichment to the union trust fund. Plaintiff notes that the trust funds do not condition payment of benefits on the basis of union membership, as to do so would be a violation of § 8 of the Labor Management Relations Act (a/k/a the Taft-Hartley Act), 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a), (b); *NLRB v. Local 138 et al.,*293 F.2d 187 (2nd Cir. 1961). In any event failure to pay benefits to employer’s employees would not constitute a defense against the trust in a collection action. *Upholsterers’ Union v. Leathercraft Furniture Co.,*82 F.Supp. 570 (E.D.Pa.1949).

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-9514-9] 

# AGENCY:

 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                         This document announces the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) responses to Agency Clearance requests, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501*et seq.*). An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                         Rick Westlund (202) 566-1682, or email at                         *westlund.rick@epa.gov*                         and please refer to the appropriate EPA Information Collection Request (ICR) Number.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## OMB Responses to Agency Clearance Requests 

## OMB Approvals 

EPA ICR Number 1686.09; NESHAP for the Secondary Lead Smelter Industry; 40 CFR part 63, subparts A and X; was approved on 03/02/2012; OMB Number 2060-0296; expires on 03/31/2015; Approved without change. 

## Comment Filed 

EPA ICR Number 2452.01; NESHAP for Pulp and Paper Production; in 40 CFR part 63 subparts A and S; OMB filed comment on 03/02/2012. 

EPA ICR Number 2457.01; NESHAP for Group IV Polymers and Resins; in 40 CFR part 63 subparts A and JJJ; OMB filed comment on 03/02/2012. 

EPA ICR Number 1811.08; NESHAP for Polyether Polyol Production; in 40 CFR part 63, subparts A and PPP; OMB filed comment on 03/06/2012. 

## Withdrawn and Continue 

                    EPA ICR Number 2258.02; PM2.5                     NAAQS Implementation Rule (Renewal); Withdrawn from OMB on 03/22/2012.                 

EPA ICR Number 2313.02; Ambient Ozone Monitoring Regulations: Revisions to Network Design Requirements (Final Rule); Withdrawn from OMB on 03/20/2012.

John Moses, 

Director, Collections Strategies Division.

[FR Doc. 2012-9107 Filed 4-16-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 109 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2020 

Mr. AMASH submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 109 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘Equality before the law shall be guaranteed by the 

3 United States and the several States.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SendTec, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald Gould, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|/s/ Donald Gould, Jr.                                                                
|Donald Gould, Jr.Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)August 14, 2008