STATE FACILITY NAME UNITID SUM OP TIME GLOAD NOX RATE NOX

MASS HEAT INPUT UNIT TYPE INFO NOX CONTROL INFO

VA Chesapeake Energy

Center 3 3,519 504,928 0.031 73.00 4,687,571 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

tic Reduction KY Ghent 4 3,376 1,301,383 0.031 186.00 12,802,812 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Overfire Air Selective Cataly

tic Reduction WV John E Amos 2 3,247 2,437,068 0.031 301.15 20,051,358 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

tic Reduction KY Ghent 3 3,631 1,382,107 0.032 206.35 13,757,234 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Overfire Air Selective Cataly

tic Reduction WV John E Amos 1 3,566 2,770,925 0.032 353.18 22,577,145 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

tic Reduction VA Chesterfield Power

Station 6 3,559 2,157,438 0.033 294.97 19,843,875Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Closedcoupled/Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction IL Havana 9 2,745 1,057,538 0.036 169.52 11,565,645 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler TX WA Parish WAP8 3,566 2,239,611 0.036 391.57 21,646,798Tangentially-fired Selective Cataly tic Reduction TX WA Parish WAP7 3,672 2,093,361 0.039 385.06 19,703,759Tangentially-fired Selective Cataly tic Reduction OH Cardinal 3 2,675 1,430,751 0.041 205.51 13,671,694 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

tic Reduction

NOx Ozone Season 2006 Page 1STATE FACILITY NAME UNITID SUM OP TIME GLOAD NOX RATE NOX

MASS HEAT INPUT UNIT TYPE INFO NOX CONTROL INFO

AL Colbert 5 3,400 1,440,473 0.041 261.86 13,236,566 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

tic Reduction VA Chesapeake Energy

Center 4 3,264 636,562 0.042 101.72 6,056,137 Tangentially-fired Selective Cataly tic Reduction VA Chesterfield Power

Station 5 3,331 979,121 0.043 180.13 9,120,737 Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction PA Keystone 1 3,575 3,087,430 0.043 599.37 28,256,121 Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Closedcoupled/Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction KY Mill Creek 4 3,502 1,650,283 0.044 320.56 15,651,164 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

tic Reduction OH Cardinal 1 3,284 1,815,839 0.045 344.60 15,970,885 Cell burner boiler Low NOx Cell Burner Selective Non-cataly

tic Reduction Selective Cataly tic Reduction TN Kingston 6 3,622 617,908 0.045 136.08 6,093,102 Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction TN Kingston 7 3,290 570,693 0.045 125.45 5,659,992 Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction TN Kingston 8 3,565 608,932 0.045 133.97 6,005,564 Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction TN Kingston 9 3,603 615,136 0.045 135.42 6,062,829Tangentially-fired Selective Cataly tic Reduction

NOx Ozone Season 2006 Page 2STATE FACILITY NAME UNITID SUM OP TIME GLOAD NOX RATE NOX

MASS HEAT INPUT UNIT TYPE INFO NOX CONTROL INFO

WV Pleasants Power

Station 1 3,391 2,163,474 0.046 393.26 18,716,545 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

tic Reduction TX WA Parish WAP6 3,532 2,300,659 0.047 524.89 22,494,695 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Selective Cataly tic Reduction KY D B Wilson W1 3,534 1,519,535 0.048 344.03 15,017,671 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Selective Cataly tic Reduction Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) KY Mill Creek 3 3,490 1,356,724 0.048 284.36 12,815,966 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

tic Reduction OH Cardinal 2 3,058 1,666,418 0.049 319.92 14,435,985 Cell burner boiler Low NOx Cell Burner Selective Cataly

tic Reduction WV Mount Storm Power

Station 2 3,590 1,861,971 0.049 419.90 18,443,193Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Closedcoupled OFA Selective Cataly tic Reduction WV Pleasants Power

Station 2 3,492 2,259,987 0.049 406.04 17,282,517 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

tic Reduction WV Mountaineer (1301) 1 2,901 3,820,660 0.050 787.50 32,484,784 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

tic Reduction KY Trimble County 1 3,499 1,843,184 0.050 374.44 15,613,675Tangentially-fired Selective Cataly tic Reduction Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Closedcoupled OFA GA Wansley

(6052) 2 3,672 3,180,453 0.051 739.97 29,264,079Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Closedcoupled/Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction

NOx Ozone Season 2006 Page 3STATE FACILITY NAME UNITID SUM OP TIME GLOAD NOX RATE NOX

MASS HEAT INPUT UNIT TYPE INFO NOX CONTROL INFO

MD AES Warrior Run 1 3,670 658,243 0.052 180.51 6,912,987 Circulating fluidized bed boiler Ammonia Injection Selective Non-cataly

tic Reduction

VA Chesterfield Power

Station 4 3,222 469,637 0.052 102.81 4,435,192 Tangentially-fired Selective Cataly tic Reduction Other MI Dan E Karn 2 3,672 914,253 0.052 250.20 9,541,784 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Overfire Air Selective Cataly

tic Reduction KY East Bend 2 3,671 2,336,478 0.052 509.94 19,752,267 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Selective Cataly tic Reduction Overfire Air TN Kingston 4 3,539 436,400 0.052 110.17 4,257,135Tangentially-fired Selective Cataly tic Reduction GA Wansley

(6052) 1 3,655 3,145,281 0.052 746.46 29,102,510 Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Closedcoupled/Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction TN Kingston 1 3,554 450,025 0.053 115.70 4,392,810 Tangentially-fired Selective Cataly tic Reduction TN Kingston 2 3,537 447,779 0.053 115.53 4,372,272 Tangentially-fired Selective Cataly tic Reduction TN Kingston 3 3,672 475,804 0.053 122.42 4,645,364 Tangentially-fired Selective Cataly tic Reduction TN Kingston 5 3,537 628,481 0.053 160.38 6,131,719Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction AL Widows Creek 8 3,399 1,469,370 0.053 288.27 13,354,017Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction GA Bowen 2BLR 3,672 2,421,269 0.054 620.79 23,017,172 Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction

NOx Ozone Season 2006 Page 4STATE FACILITY NAME UNITID SUM OP TIME GLOAD NOX RATE NOX

MASS HEAT INPUT UNIT TYPE INFO NOX CONTROL INFO

WV Mount Storm Power

Station 1 3,469 1,713,232 0.054 383.90 16,990,171 Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Closedcoupled OFA Selective Cataly tic Reduction PA St. Nicholas

Cogeneration Project 1 3,490 0.054 105.42 3,947,783 Circulating fluidized bed boiler

SC Wateree WAT2 3,308 1,131,779 0.054 254.16 9,742,832 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

tic Reduction IL Baldwin Energy

Complex 2 2,966 1,732,825 0.055 435.39 16,635,433 Cyclone boiler Overfire Air Selective Cataly tic Reduction GA Bowen 1BLR 3,624 2,290,292 0.055 576.95 21,181,336 Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction GA Bowen 3BLR 3,645 3,076,779 0.055 805.06 29,501,356 Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction CT AES Thames UNITA 3,624 0.056 100.74 3,586,958 Circulating fluidized bed boiler Other

CT AES Thames UNITB 3,404 0.056 90.81 3,300,745 Circulating fluidized bed boiler Other

IL Baldwin Energy

Complex 1 3,432 2,025,223 0.056 493.23 18,784,984 Cyclone boiler Overfire Air Selective Cataly tic Reduction NC Belews Creek 2 3,476 3,833,652 0.056 791.05 31,461,836 Cell burner boiler Low NOx Cell Burner Overfire Air Selective Cataly tic Reduction GA Hammond 4 3,574 1,482,117 0.056 437.53 16,008,523 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Selective Cataly tic Reduction Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) OH Miami Fort

Generating Station 8 3,463 1,447,923 0.056 365.26 13,024,438 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Selective Cataly tic Reduction Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only)

NOx Ozone Season 2006 Page 5STATE FACILITY NAME UNITID SUM OP TIME GLOAD NOX RATE NOX

MASS HEAT INPUT UNIT TYPE INFO NOX CONTROL INFO

TX WA Parish WAP5 3,519 2,259,068 0.056 635.21 22,824,181 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Selective Cataly tic Reduction OH WH Zimmer

Generating Station 1 3,130 4,159,440 0.056 897.38 33,712,275 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) TN Allen 1 3,589 923,957 0.057 246.63 8,884,727 Cyclone boiler Overfire Air Selective Cataly tic Reduction OH Miami Fort

Generating Station 7 3,408 1,356,396 0.057 336.95 12,620,473 Cell burner boiler Low NOx Cell Burner Selective Cataly

tic Reduction GA Bowen 4BLR 3,535 2,997,950 0.058 797.68 28,192,896 Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction KY Ghent 1 3,561 1,687,590 0.058 428.00 16,403,068Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction PA Montour 1 3,426 2,393,420 0.058 554.94 19,891,173Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Closedcoupled/Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction PA Montour 2 3,481 2,429,026 0.058 565.19 20,449,998Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Closedcoupled/Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction NC Cliffside 5 3,585 1,833,853 0.059 458.75 16,087,057Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Closedcoupled/Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction PA Northeastern Power

Company 31 3,644 212,068 0.059 80.69 2,735,762 Circulating fluidized bed boiler Other

NOx Ozone Season 2006 Page 6STATE FACILITY NAME UNITID SUM OP TIME GLOAD NOX RATE NOX

MASS HEAT INPUT UNIT TYPE INFO NOX CONTROL INFO

AL James H Miller Jr 3 3,672 2,566,654 0.063 818.22 25,897,215 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

tic Reduction IL Kincaid Station 2 2,989 1,156,669 0.063 375.26 12,262,113 Cyclone boiler Overfire Air Selective Cataly tic Reduction IN Petersburg 2 3,512 1,408,961 0.063 453.16 14,637,041 Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Closedcoupled/Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction OH Gen J M Gavin 2 2,968 3,782,793 0.064 1023.80 33,309,117 Cell burner boiler Low NOx Cell Burner Selective Cataly

tic Reduction IN Gibson 5 3,323 2,100,091 0.064 518.67 17,147,379 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Overfire Air Selective Cataly

tic Reduction IL Archer Daniels

Midland Co. FBC9 3,542 0.065 139.08 4,260,637 Circulating fluidized bed boiler Other Selective Noncataly tic Reduction NC Mayo 1B 3,455 0.065 261.66 9,821,180 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

ticReduction (Began 19-APR06) PA Scrubgrass

Generating Plant 1 3,569 0.065 67.35 2,061,634 Circulating fluidized bed boiler Selective Non-cataly tic Reduction IL Tate & Lyle 123-08 3,293 0.065 57.00 1,849,326 Circulating fluidized bed boiler Other

AL James H Miller Jr 1 3,576 2,511,643 0.066 873.88 26,479,334 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

tic Reduction PA Kimberly-Clark Tissue

Company 35 3,654 0.066 90.00 2,795,937 Circulating fluidized bed boiler IL Kincaid Station 1 3,468 1,336,843 0.066 464.06 14,123,549 Cyclone boiler Overfire Air Selective Cataly tic Reduction

NOx Ozone Season 2006 Page 7STATE FACILITY NAME UNITID SUM OP TIME GLOAD NOX RATE NOX

MASS HEAT INPUT UNIT TYPE INFO NOX CONTROL INFO

IL Marion 123 3,521 364,287 0.066 169.23 5,161,695 Circulating fluidized bed boiler Selective Non-cataly tic Reduction NC Mayo 1A 3,586 0.066 305.71 11,063,780 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

ticReduction (Began 19-APR06) IN Gibson 1 3,546 2,099,001 0.067 628.67 18,896,688 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Overfire Air Selective Cataly

tic Reduction IN Gibson 2 3,623 1,968,925 0.067 590.95 17,735,402 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Overfire Air Selective Cataly

tic Reduction PA Homer City 1 3,550 2,218,858 0.067 651.00 19,792,060 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Overfire Air Selective Cataly

tic Reduction AL James H Miller Jr 4 3,650 2,528,719 0.067 805.05 24,251,878 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

tic Reduction AL Widows Creek 7 3,162 1,308,355 0.067 410.73 13,895,113Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction AL Gorgas 10 3,603 2,488,471 0.068 748.88 22,805,226 Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction MT Hardin U1 2,442 253,805 0.068 99.47 2,892,946 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler IN Gibson 3 3,597 2,053,913 0.069 671.75 19,609,412 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Overfire Air Selective Cataly

tic Reduction

NOx Ozone Season 2006 Page 8STATE FACILITY NAME UNITID SUM OP TIME GLOAD NOX RATE NOX

MASS HEAT INPUT UNIT TYPE INFO NOX CONTROL INFO

AL James H Miller Jr 2 3,645 2,571,646 0.069 884.03 25,784,372 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

tic Reduction WV Harrison Power

Station 3 2,853 1,794,572 0.070 538.54 16,418,409 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

tic Reduction TN Allen 2 2,972 740,190 0.071 227.91 6,883,519 Cyclone boiler Overfire Air Selective Cataly tic Reduction OH Gen J M Gavin 1 3,258 4,177,892 0.071 1292.36 38,879,431 Cell burner boiler Low NOx Cell Burner Selective Cataly

tic Reduction OH Muskingum River 5 3,145 1,696,144 0.071 476.37 14,049,389 Cell burner boiler Low NOx Cell Burner Selective Cataly

tic Reduction FL Northside 2A 3,442 966,618 0.071 361.85 10,101,496 Circulating fluidized bed boiler Selective Non-cataly tic Reduction TN Cumberland 1 3,604 4,406,197 0.072 1432.52 42,424,941 Cell burner boiler Low NOx Cell Burner Selective Cataly

tic Reduction MO Hawthorn 5A 3,281 1,695,657 0.072 637.65 17,641,777 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Selective Cataly tic Reduction TN Allen 3 3,618 914,388 0.073 309.79 9,114,629 Cyclone boiler Overfire Air Selective Cataly tic Reduction KY H L Spurlock 2 3,672 1,736,571 0.073 645.20 17,675,376 Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Closedcoupled OFA Selective Cataly tic Reduction FL Northside 1A 2,909 836,639 0.073 305.86 8,363,906 Circulating fluidized bed boiler Selective Non-cataly tic Reduction PA Northampton

Generating Plant NGC01 3,576 422,396 0.074 181.91 4,926,757 Circulating fluidized bed boiler Ammonia Injection

AZ Springerville

Generating Station TS3 741 287,857 0.074 115.11 3,052,849 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler (Started 01- JUN-06) Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

tic Reduction

NOx Ozone Season 2006 Page 9STATE FACILITY NAME UNITID SUM OP TIME GLOAD NOX RATE NOX

MASS HEAT INPUT UNIT TYPE INFO NOX CONTROL INFO

TN Cumberland 2 3,423 4,289,440 0.075 1311.64 38,844,616 Cell burner boiler Low NOx Cell Burner Selective Cataly

tic Reduction MD Herbert A Wagner 3 2,681 716,814 0.075 247.74 7,019,842 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Overfire Air Selective Cataly

tic Reduction IN A B Brown

Generating Station 1 3,642 804,491 0.076 280.67 7,689,965 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

tic Reduction WV Mount Storm Power

Station 3 3,541 1,844,135 0.077 667.99 17,880,173Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Closedcoupled OFA Selective Cataly tic Reduction SC Cross 1 3,629 2,067,638 0.078 789.30 20,605,967 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Selective Cataly tic Reduction Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Overfire Air

SC Cross 2 3,591 1,998,935 0.078 758.82 19,668,198Tangentially-fired Selective Cataly tic Reduction Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Closedcoupled OFA PA Ebensburg Power

Company 31 3,557 207,448 0.078 103.84 2,672,285 Circulating fluidized bed boiler IN Harding Street Station

(EWStout) 70 3,465 1,244,526 0.079 421.74 11,148,530 Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Closedcoupled/Separated OFA Selective Cataly

tic Reduction WV Harrison Power

Station 1 3,172 1,946,995 0.079 615.24 16,428,962 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

tic Reduction WV Harrison Power

Station 2 3,603 2,318,091 0.079 826.26 21,381,569 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) Selective Cataly

tic Reduction

NOx Ozone Season 2006 Page 10STATE FACILITY NAME UNITID SUM OP TIME GLOAD NOX RATE NOX

MASS HEAT INPUT UNIT TYPE INFO NOX CONTROL INFO

AL E C Gaston 5 3,446 2,881,837 0.080 1130.21 28,927,639Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Separated OFA Selective Cataly

ticReduction (Began 29-APR06) KY HMP&L Station 2 H1 3,623 551,436 0.080 201.29 5,494,016 Dry bottom wall-fired boiler Selective Cataly tic Reduction Low NOx Burner Technology

(Dry Bottom only) NC Roxboro 2 3,548 2,006,613 0.080 670.31 18,809,563Tangentially-fired Low NOx Burner Technology

w/ Separated OFA Overfire Air Selective Cataly tic Reduction

NOx Ozone Season 2006 Page 11