alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2













CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of ZAGG Inc (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Brandon T. O’Brien, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/BRANDON T. O’BRIENBrandon T. O’Brien

Chief Financial Officer

January 27, 2012




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 35.1





Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.








This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 18, 2023 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2023-1 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.  I further certify as follows:





1. I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 18, 2023 through December 31, 2023, and its performance under the Agreement.





2. To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.








AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.





By:/s/ Connie CoffeyDated:March 4, 2024Connie CoffeyExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
Document

Exhibit 10.18




Summary of Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements


In addition to the compensation arrangements filed as other exhibits to this annual report, Pyxus International, Inc. (the “Company”) has the following compensation arrangements with its named executive officers.


Compensation Arrangements for Named Executive Officers


The board of directors sets the annual base salary for each of the Company’s chief executive officer, chief financial officer and its next most highly compensated executive officer (such three officers, the “named executive officers”).  As of June 1, 2022, the annual base salary rates for the named executive officers were as follows:


						
	Named Executive Officer
	Base Salary

	J. Pieter Sikkel	$725,000 	
	Flavia Landsberg	$462,000 	
		
	William L. O’Quinn, Jr.	$360,577
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Serge Atlan, certify that: 

  1) I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-QSB of FalconTarget, Inc.;  

  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;  

  3) Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;  

  4) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  

  a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based upon such evaluation; and  

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and  

  5) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):  

  a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information and 

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: February 15, 2006

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan 

    Serge Atlan

    Chairman
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sheer Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  November 10, 2004





/s/ Doug Berry

-------------------------------------------

Doug Berry, President and C.E.O.

(Principal Executive Officer)
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 5 - 0 13 2 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 4 - CE - 0 3 8 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 57 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall for an event to commemorate 

the 400th anniversary of the arrival of the first African slaves to the 

territory that would become the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 9, 2019 

Ms. BASS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall for an event to 

commemorate the 400th anniversary of the arrival of 

the first African slaves to the territory that would become the United States. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT COM4 MEMORATING 400TH ANNIVERSARY OF AR5 RIVAL OF FIRST AFRICAN SLAVES. 

6 Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is 

7 authorized to be used on September 10, 2019, for an event 

8 to commemorate the 400th anniversary of the arrival of 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 57 IH 

1 the first African slaves to the territory that would become 

2 the United States. Physical preparations for the ceremony 

3 shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as 

4 the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
H. Con. Res. 79 Agreed to May 22, 2001

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES ON CAPITOL

GROUNDS.

The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association (in this

resolution referred to as the ‘‘Association’’) shall be permitted to

sponsor a public event, soap box derby races, on the Capitol Grounds

on June 23, 2001, or on such other date as the Speaker of the

House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly designate.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

The event to be carried out under this resolution shall be

free of admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere

with the needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by

the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board; except

that the Association shall assume full responsibility for all expenses

and liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

For the purposes of this resolution, the Association is authorized

to erect upon the Capitol Grounds, subject to the approval of the

Architect of the Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices,

and other related structures and equipment as may be required

for the event to be carried out under this resolution.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board

are authorized to make any such additional arrangements that

may be required to carry out the event under this resolution.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the

restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946

(40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, advertisements,

displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other
H. Con. Res. 79—2

restrictions applicable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the

event to be carried out under this resolution.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 472 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 472

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2002

        Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the 4-H Youth Development Program.

Whereas the 4-H Youth Development Program celebrates its 100th anniversary in 
        2002;
Whereas members of the 4-H Youth Development Program pledge their Heads to 
        clearer thinking, their Hearts to greater loyalty, their Hands to larger 
        service, and their Health to better living for the club, the community, 
        the country, and the world;
Whereas the 4-H Youth Development Program sponsors clubs in rural and urban 
        areas throughout the world;
Whereas 4-H Clubs have grown to over 5,600,000 annual participants ranging from 
        5 to 19 years of age;
Whereas 4-H Clubs strengthen families and communities;
Whereas 4-H Clubs foster leadership and volunteerism for youth and adults;
Whereas 4-H Clubs build internal and external partnerships for programming and 
        resource development;
Whereas today's 4-H Clubs are very diverse, offering projects relating to 
        citizenship and civic education, communications and expressive arts, 
        consumer and family sciences, environmental education and earth 
        sciences, healthy lifestyle education, personal development and 
        leadership, plants, animals, and science and technology; and
Whereas the 4-H Youth Development Program continues to make great contributions 
        toward the development of well-rounded youth: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) recognizes the 100th anniversary of the 4-H Youth 
        Development Program and commends the program for service to the 
        youth of the world; and
            (2) urges the President to issue a proclamation calling on 
        the people of the United States to observe a ``National 4-H 
        Youth Development Program Week'' with appropriate ceremonies 
        and activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
MEMORANDUM

DATE: November 20, 2014

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR-2013-0602

FROM: Rob Lawrence

EPA/Region 6/PD

SUBJECT: July 10, 2014 Call with New Mexico Environment Department regarding the 

Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A conference call was made by EPA to the New Mexico Environment Department and the 

attendees listed below on July 10, 2014, to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants, which was proposed on June 2, 2014. 

ATTENDEES

Participants: Richard Goodyear

EPA Participants: Mark Hansen, Clovis Steib, Terry Johnson, and Guy Donaldson (Region 6) 

and Brian Fisher, and Kristen Bremer (OAR)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jacob J. GORDON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 76-1105.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Submitted June 1, 1976.

Decided July 23, 1976.

Jacob J. Gordon, pro se.

James N. Gabriel, U. S. Atty., and Lawrence P. Cohen, Asst. U. S. Atty., Deputy Chief, Crim. Div., Boston, Mass., on brief, for appellee.

Before COFFIN, Chief Judge, McENTEE and CAMPBELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, after a jury trial, was convicted of attempted forcible rescue of seized property in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7212(b) and of assault of a federal officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111. He was sentenced to imprisonment for one year, three months of which was to be served, with two years’ probation, and was fined $2000. Notice of appeal was filed in late January, 1976, briefs were filed by both appellant and the government; the case set for argument at our June, 1976, sitting.

When the case was reached for argument, on June 1, appellant, who was proceeding *pro se*in this court, failed to appear. Government counsel informed us orally, and subsequently by written motion, that on May 13, 1976, appellant failed to appear for trial in another case, *United States v. Jacob J. Gordon,*Criminal No. *91575-276-M, that a warrant of arrest was then issued and has since been outstanding. The government moves for a dismissal of this appeal with prejudice.

We have on similar occasions relied on *Molinaro*v. *New Jersey,*396 U.S. 365, 90 S.Ct. 498, 24 L.Ed.2d 586 (1970), and other precedents to invoke the sanction of dismissal when an appellant, by his “conduct in seeking to invoke the processes of the law while flouting them”, has disentitled himself to a determination of his appeal. *United States ex rel. Bailey*v. *U.S.C.O. of Provost Marshal, U.S. Army,*496 F.2d 324, 326 (1 Cir.1974); *United States v. Tremont,*438 F.2d 1202 (1 Cir. 1971). Other circuits have taken the same course, sometimes phrasing the issue in terms of an inherent power to refuse to hear a case when it is unlikely that a convicted party will respond to an unfavorable decision. *See, e. g., United States v. Shelton,*482 F.2d 848 (5th Cir. 1973); *Brinlee v. United States,*483 F.2d 925 (8th Cir. 1973); *United States v. Swigart,*490 F.2d 914 (10th Cir. 1973). *Cf. Ruetz v. Lash,*500 F.2d 1225 (7th Cir. 1974).

We are mindful that the sanction of dismissal should not lightly be invoked, and we are aware that such cases as *Shelton, Swigart,*and *Brinlee*have given some additional opportunity for the absent appellant to appear. But, in this case the absence of the appellant is only the most recent in a series of similar defaults. We see no basis for delaying our action.

Nevertheless, since we have had briefs, we have surveyed the fourteen issues listed by appellant. While we do not say that none of the issues constituted a substantial question, we are satisfied that no manifest injustice occurred in appellant’s conviction.

*Appeal dismissed.*
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00379

- CR

Pablo Garcia

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 4

o f Tarrant County (1219702D )

November 7, 2013

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_________________________________ Justice Lee Gabriel
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Solo Cup Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the thirteen weeks ended June 28, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert D. Koney, Jr., as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Robert D. Koney, Jr.
|Robert D. Koney, Jr.    
|Chief Financial Officer 
|August 11, 2009
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

A pril 4, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00080

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.J.M. AND A.R.P., CHILDREN,

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- PA

- 00429 Honorable Stephani A. Walsh, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental rights. A ppellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on March 13, 2018

. Because n either the brief nor a motion for extension of time was filed by the deadline, this court issued an order on March 20, 2018, ordering appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(a). On April 2, 2018, appellant filed a written response to this court’s order requesting an extension of time to file the brief. The motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief must be filed no later than Ap ril 23, 2018, and must comply with Rule 38.1 of the Texas Rules of Appella te Procedure which sets forth the required content of an appellant’s brief. Because this is an accelerated appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on t his 4th day of April, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of INTREorg  Systems,  Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period  ended  September  30,  2008,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Denis Iler, Principali
Executive Officer and President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 19, 2008



By:      /s/ Denis Iler
         ----------------------------------
         Denis Iler
         Principal Executive Officer, President