alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**
  **CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO**
 **18
            U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
            ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
            906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
            connection with the Quarterly Report of Zagg Incorporated, (the “Company”) on
            Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
            and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brandon T.
            O’Brien, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the best
            of my
            knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
            Section
            906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
            Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15
            (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
            information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
            respects,
            the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  
 **/s/****BRANDON T. O’BRIEN**Brandon
                      T. O’BrienChief
                      Financial OfficerMay
                      15, 2007
  The
            foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
            ss. 1350
            and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
            document.
ANNUAL CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

 

OF

 

SCP SERVICING, LLC

 

 

**BMO 2023-C7 Mortgage Trust**

** **

**Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2023-C7**

 

 

I, Vartan Derbedrossian, theChief Servicing Officer of SCP Servicing, LLC, a Delaware limited liabilitycompany, as Subservicer (hereinafter the “ Subservicer”), under thatcertain Subservicing Agreement BMO 2023-C7 Mortgage Trust Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2023-C7 dated as of December 1, 2023, by andbetween Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, asMaster Servicer and Subservicer(the “Subservicing Agreement”), certify pursuantto Section 3.05(a) of the Subservicing Agreement to the Certificate Administrator,and the Depositor (as those terms are defined in the PSA (as defined in theSubservicing Agreement)) all of the following as of February 22, 2024:

 

(a)     that a review of the activities of theSubservicer during the period from 12/22/2023 to 12/31/2023 (the “Reporting Period”)and of its performance under the Subservicing Agreement has been made under mysupervision; and

 

(b)    that, to the best of my knowledge,based on such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all of its obligations underthe Subservicing Agreement in all material respects during the Reporting Period.

 

 

*[Signature page follows]*

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Certificatehas been executed and is effective as of February 22, 2024.

 

 

SUBSERVICER :

 

**SCP Servicing, LLC,**

a Delaware limited liability company

 

 

By: /s/ Vartan Derbedrossian

Name: Vartan Derbedrossian

Title: Chief Servicing Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

     I, Dennis Eldjarnson, hereby certify that:

   1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Siam Imports,
Inc.

   2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material Fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

   3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows as of,
and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

   4.  The other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and we have:

       a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to Siam Imports, Inc., including its
subsidiaries, if any, is made known to us by others within  those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

       b)    evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures
as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report
(the "Evaluation Date"); and

       c)    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

   5.   The other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to our auditors and the audit committee of our board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

       a)   that there were no significant deficiencies in the design or
operation
of internal controls which could adversely affect our ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have further advised our
auditors that there we are not aware of any material weaknesses in our internal
controls; and

       b)    that there was no fraud, whether or not material, that involved
our management or other employees who have a significant role in our internal
controls.

   6.  The other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report that there were no significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the
date of our most recent evaluation.



                                                  SIAM IMPORTS, INC.,
                                        a Nevada corporation (Registrant)


Dated: November 23, 2005                By: /s/ Dennis Eldjarnson, President,
                                        CEO, Treasurer, CFO, Principal
                                        Accounting Officer and Director
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Solo Cup Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the thirteen weeks ended
June 27, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert D. Koney, Jr., as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert D. Koney, Jr.                                                                                              
|Robert D. Koney, Jr.
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

August 9, 2010

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7216

MARK A. GRETHEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of 

Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief

District Judge. (2:13-cv-00698-RBS-DEM)

Submitted: March 27, 2015 Decided: April 7, 2015

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark A. Grethen, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Mark A. Grethen seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is 

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Grethen has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000893 20-APR-2017 08:41 AM
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No. FAA
- 2011
- 0859 Directorate ID: 2010
- SW
- 052
- AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France (ECF) Model EC120B Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 20 Helic opters in the US Registry. Reason : prevent the inability to isolate electrical equipment during an emergency, the risk of an uncontrolled electrical fire , and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 17 Labor per Helicop ter ( 1 x $ 8 5 /work
-hour) $ 85 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 102 Total US Fleet Cost $ 2,040 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedur es : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer: George Schwab
# C_2004094EN.01003703.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/37

---

Removal from the register of Case C-309/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 94/108)

By order of 11 December 2003 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case C-309/03 (Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Juzgado de lo Social N. 33): Ana Isabel López Gil v Instituto Nacional de Empleo (Inem).

---

(1)  OJ C 226 of 20.09.2003.

1

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-20940

Conference Calendar

 

JOE GAMBOA RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DESSIE CHERRY et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-95-CV-3831

- - - - - - - - - -

April 16, 1997

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Joe Gamboa Rodriguez, #648878, moves this court for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis on appeal from the dismissal of his

civil rights complaint. On January 9, 1997, Chief Judge Politz

ordered Rodriguez to file an affidavit for leave to proceed IFP

on appeal pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995

(PLRA). The order held Rodriguez’s appeal in abeyance for 30

days pending payment of the $105 filing fee or submittal of the
No. 96-20940

- 2 -

required documents pursuant to the PLRA. Rodriguez timely

responded; however, the financial documentation submitted by

Rodriguez does not comply with the requirements imposed by the

PLRA because he did not submit a signed affidavit attesting to

his assets owned, nor did Rodriguez submit information regarding

his prison trust account for the period required. See § 1915(a). 

Accordingly, Rodriguez’s motion for leave to proceed IFP on

appeal is DENIED, and his appeal is dismissed for want of

prosecution. See Fifth Circuit Rule 42.3. Should Rodriguez wish

to reinstate his appeal, he is instructed to pay the $105 filing

fee to the clerk of the district court within 30 days from the

date of this order. 

MOTION DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.
IV 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 87 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall for a ceremony as part of the 

commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2020 

Mr. SCHNEIDER (for himself, Mr. ZELDIN, Mr. DEUTCH, Mr. KUSTOFF of 

Tennessee, and Mr. LEWIS) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall for a ceremony 

as part of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Vis3 itor Center is authorized to be used on April 21, 2020, 

4 for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days 

5 of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust. Physical 

6 preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out in ac7 cordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Cap8 itol may prescribe. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.0  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kearny Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John N. Hopkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
    Date: February 9, 2009
        
        /s/ John N. HopkinsJohn N. HopkinsPresident and Chief Executive Officer
   
 Exhibit 32.0   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kearny Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William C. Ledgerwood, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
    Date: February 9, 2009
        
        /s/ William C. LedgerwoodWilliam C. LedgerwoodSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
IN THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

HOUSTON DIVISION

KENDRICK DONAHOE §

§

VS. § NO. 01-15-00191-CV

§

DANNY JONES §

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

TO THE HONORABLE CLERK OF THE COURT:

COMES NOW, Kevin L. Hood of the law firm of FABREGApHOOD, L.L.P. and makes

this appearance of counsel for Appellee, Danny Jones. Please designate me as counsel for Danny

Jones and add the following information to your records:

Respectfully submitted,

FABREGApHOOD, L.L.P.

By: Kevin L. Hood 

Kevin L. Hood

State Bar No.: 0941100

Federal Bar No.: ****

1221 McKinney, Suite 3150

Houston, Texas 77010

Telephone: (713) 228-2322

Facsimile: (713) 228-0088

khood@fabregahood.com

COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE, DANNY JONES

ACCEPTED

01-15-00191-cv

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/7/2015 10:50:16 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/7/2015 10:50:16 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This pleading was served in compliance with Rule 5 of the FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE on April 6, 2015, in the manner indicated below:

Ms. Sarah S. Doezema

DOEZEMA & ASSOCIATES, PLLC

3607 E. Old Spanish Trail, Suite E

Houston, Texas 77021

Via Electronic Mail

and/or Certified Mail/RRR

Kevin L. Hood 

Kevin L. Hood

2
# C_2004094EN.01005302.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/53

---

Action brought on 12 February 2004 by Luis Escobar Guerrero against Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-52/04)

(2004/C 94/143)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 12 February 2004 by Luis Escobar Guerrero, residing in Luxembourg, represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Albert Coolen, Jean-Noël Louis and Etienne Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | Annul the Commission's decision to promote the applicant to Grade A5 for the promotion year 2002 in so far as the date on which it takes effect is fixed at 1 May 2003; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission's decision to promote the applicant to Grade A5 for the promotion year 2002 in so far as the date on which it takes effect is fixed at 1 May 2003;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Following the Commission's decision to promote him to Grade A5, the applicant withdrew his action in Case T-92/03 against the decision not to promote him during the 2002 promotion procedure. In the present case, the applicant claims that the Commission was required to promote him to Grade A5 with effect from 1 April 2002 on the same terms as the other officials promoted to that grade in the 2002 promotion procedure.

In support of his action, the applicant claims that there has been a breach of the principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination, a breach of the principle that officials should have reasonable career prospects and also failure to implement in good faith the Commission's decision to deal favourably with the complaint forming the subject-matter of Case T-92/03.

---
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Joe Boyce Cox, Appellant

No. 06

- 13

- 00194

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 6th District Court of Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 23689 ). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss,

Justice Carter and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of

the court below. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause for

further proceedings.

We further order that the appell ee
, The State of Texas , pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 2 9 , 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
In the Senate of the United States, 

January 25 (legislative day, January 24), 2019. 

Resolved, That the resolution from the House of Representatives (H.J. Res. 31) entitled ‘‘Joint resolution making 

further continuing appropriations for the Department of 

Homeland Security for fiscal year 2019, and for other purposes.’’, do pass with the following 

AMENDMENT: 

Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the 

following: 

1 The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2019 (division C 

2 of Public Law 115–245) is further amended— 

3 (1) in section 105— 

4 (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

5 the end; 

6 (B) in paragraph (3)— 

7 (i) by inserting ‘‘except as provided in 

8 paragraph (4),’’ before ‘‘December’’; and 
2 

† HJ 31 EAS 

1 (ii) by striking the period at the end 

2 and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

3 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(4) with respect to appropriations and funds 

5 made available, and other authorities granted, pursu6 ant to section 101(5) of this joint resolution for the 

7 Department of Homeland Security, February 15, 

8 2019.’’; and 

9 (2) in section 110, by adding at the end the fol10 lowing: 

11 ‘‘(c) With respect to mandatory payments whose budg12 et authority was provided in the Department of Homeland 

13 Security Appropriations Act, 2018 (division F of Public 

14 Law 115–141), subsections (a) and (b) shall be applied by 

15 substituting ‘section 105(4)’ for ‘section 105(3)’ each place 

16 it appears.’’. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 31 

AMENDMENT
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aurelio Resource Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen B. Doppler, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 13, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen B. Doppler 
|                       |  |  |  | Stephen B. Doppler     
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement is required by Section 906 has been provided to Aurelio Resource
Corporation and will be retained by Aurelio Resource Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.