alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, Peter
J. Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31,
2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable, and that information contained
in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Prestige Brands Holdings,
Inc.




/s/
      Peter J.
      AndersonName:
            Peter
      J. AndersonTitle:
            Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:
            February
      9, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2600]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-852]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


 Surrender of License of Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of the Small 
Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to 
function as a small business investment company under the Small 
Business Investment Company License No. 01/71-0390 issued to RockPort 
Capital Partners, LP and said license is hereby declared null and void.

    Dated: October 27, 2011.
Sean J. Greene,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 2012-852 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 22795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9224]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; RFA Panel: Single Cell Analysis Reviews.
    Date: May 8, 2012.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Residence Inn Bethesda, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, 
MD 20814.
    Contact Person: John Burch, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institute of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 3213, MSC 7808, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-408-
9519, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dbb9aea9b8b3b1b99bb8a8a9f5b5b2b3f5bcb4ad"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4022353223282a22002333326e2e29286e272f36">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 11, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-9224 Filed 4-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



POLYPORE, INC.
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polypore, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 15, 2006
    
    /s/ Robert B. TothRobert B. Toth
President and Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20582 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ASDRUBAL ADONAY BUSTILLO-QUAN, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-44-1

-------------------- April 11, 2002 Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Asdrubal Adonay Bustillo-Quan has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Bustillo has not filed a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities in this case, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 75 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 75

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 19, 2019

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a 
               correction in the enrollment of H.R. 3055.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3055, the Clerk of the House 
of Representatives shall make the following corrections:
            (1) Amend the long title so as to read: ``Making further 
        continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2020, and for other 
        purposes.''.
            (2) Redesignate the second subsection (a) of section 1703 
        as subsection (b).

            Passed the House of Representatives November 19, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT GER ALD REYNOLDS, Jr., Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. G. STAR C EVIC H, Dr.; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 12-15662 D.C . No. 2:11-c v-00326-GEB C M K M EM O R ANDUM * Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia Garland E. B urre ll, Jr., Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d M arc h 12, 2013 ** B e fore : PR EGER SON, REINHAR DT, a n d W . FLETC HER , C irc uit Judge s. Form e r C a lifornia

sta te prisone r Ge ra ld R e y

nolds, Jr., a

ppe a ls pro se from the d istric t c o urt’ s judgm e nt dismissing his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging de libe rat e indiffe re nc e to his se rious m e dic a l ne e ds. W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 28 

# FIL ED MAR 22 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).U.S.C . § 1291. W e re v ie w de n ovo a dism issa l for fa ilure to e xha ust a dm inistra

tive re m e die s. W

y a tt v . Te rhune , 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th C i r. 2003). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly dism isse d R e ynolds’ s a c tion be c a use R e ynolds fa ile d to e xha

ust his a dm inistra

tive re m e die s prior to filing suit. Se eW oodford v . N go , 548 U.S. 81, 85, 93-95 (2006) (holding tha t “prope r e xha

ustion”is m andatory and re quire s a dhe re nc e to a dm inistra tive proc e dura l rule s); Mc K inne y v . C a re y , 311 F.3d 1198, 1199 (9th C ir. 2002) (pe r c uriam ) (re quiring e xha u stion of a dm inistra

tive re m e die s prior to filing suit). To the e xte nt tha

t R e y nolds a lle ge s tha

t de fe nda nts viola te d his c onstitutiona

l rights in the

proc e ssing of his grieva

nc e , he fa ils to sta

te a c la im be c a use R e ynolds ha s no c onstitutiona l right to a

spe c ific prison grie v an c e proc e d ure . Se eRamire

z v . Galaza , 334 F.3d 850, 860 (9th C ir. 2003). AFFIRM E D.

1 2 - 1 5 6 6 2 2
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 01, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 01, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0293. IN THE INTEREST OF: D. J. F. AND J. C. F., CHILDREN (MOTHER).

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

142613 142614
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0174

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

WILLIAM E. CUNNINGHAM,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 9, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 28 2022

03/28/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0174
# C_2004094EN.01003702.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/37

---

Removal from the register of Case C-303/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 94/107)

By order of 6 January 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case C-303/03: Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic.

---

(1)  OJ C 213 of 6.9.2003.

1

---
Exhibit 10.1


 


Amendment No. 1 of the


Movano Inc. Amended and Restated


2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan


 


This Amendment No. 1 (“Amendment”),
dated April 15, 2022, of the Amended and Restated 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Existing Plan”; as amended hereby, the
“Plan”), of Movano Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), is made and adopted by the Company, subject to
approval of the stockholders of the Company.


 


Statement of Purpose


 


The Existing Plan was adopted by the Company’s
Board of Directors (the “Board”) on February 10, 2021, and approved by the stockholders of the Company on February 24, 2021.
The Board may amend the Existing Plan at any time, pursuant to and subject to Section 5.2 of the Existing Plan, contingent on approval
by the stockholders of the Company, if stockholder approval is required by applicable securities exchange rules or applicable law. The
Board has determined that it is advisable and in the best interest of the Company to amend the Existing Plan to increase the number of
shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, authorized for issuance under the Existing Plan by 6,000,000
shares, and to make the other changes to the Existing Plan described in this Amendment.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Existing Plan is hereby amended
as follows, subject to approval by the stockholders of the Company:


 


1. Capitalized
Terms. All capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings given thereto in the Existing Plan.


 


2. Amendment
of Section 4.1 of Existing Plan. Section 4.1 of the Existing Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


4.1. Authorized Number of Shares


 


Subject to adjustment under Section 14, the total
number of Shares authorized to be awarded under the Plan is 13,400,000. Shares issued under the Plan shall consist in whole or in part
of authorized but unissued Shares, treasury Shares, or Shares purchased on the open market or otherwise, all as determined by the Company
from time to time.


 


3. Amendment
of Section 4.3.1 of Existing Plan. Section 4.3.1 of the Existing Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


4.3.1. Incentive Stock Options


 


Subject to adjustment under Section 14, 13,400,000
shares shall be available for issuance as Incentive Stock Options under the Plan.


 


4. Reference
to and Effect on the Plan. The Plan, as amended hereby, and all other documents, instruments and agreements executed and/or delivered
in connection therewith, shall remain in full force and effect, and are hereby ratified and confirmed.


 


5. Governing
Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.


 


6. Effective
Date. This Amendment shall be effective this 15th day of April 2022, subject to the approval of the stockholders of the
Company.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A 21D 0187. G R E G H O L LAND et a l

. v. G U A R A N T Y S O L U T I O N S R E C O V E R Y

FUND I , L.P. et a l

.

I n t h i s g arn i s h m en t act i o n , t h e t ri al co u rt en t ered an o rd er req u iri n g t h e

Defen d an t Greg Ho l l an d an d Th i rd Part y Teri Ho ll an d t o ap p ear fo r d ep os i t i o n s

. In

t h at s am e o rd er, t h e t ri al co u rt d en i e d D e f e n dan t Greg Ho l l an d ’ s cl ai m an d Th i rd

Part y Teri Ho l l an d ’ s t rav ers e “ at p res en t ,” an d s tay ed t h e g arn i sh m en t act i o n p en d i n g

t h e o ut co m e o f m o t i o ns i n t h e u nd erl y i n g ju d g m en t cas e. Th e Ho ll an d s t h en fi l ed t h i s

ap p li cat io n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal . W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. Gen eral ly

, a p art y m

u s t fo l l o w t h e d i s cret io n ary ap p eal p ro ced u re t o ap p eal an

o rd er i n a g arn i s h m en t cas e. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (4 ). Ho wev er, t h i s cas e i s s t i l l

p en di n g b el o w. Becau s e t h e o rd er t h at t h e Ho l l an d s wi sh t o ap p ea l i s n o t a fi n al

ju d g m en t

, t h ey were req u ired t o co m p l y wi th t h e i n t erl o cu t o ry ap p eal p ro ced u re s et

fo rt h i n OCGA § 5 -6 -3 4 (b ). See S cr u g gs v. Ga

. Dep t

. o

f Hu ma n Res o u r ces , 2 6 1 Ga.

5 8 7

, 5 8 8 -5 8 9 (1 ) (4 0 8 S E2 d 1 0 3 ) (1 9 9 1 ). Al t h o u gh t h e Ho l l an d s di d fi l e a

d i s cret i o n ary

ap pl i cat io n pu rs u an t t o OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 , wh i ch g o v ern s d i s cret i o n ary

ap p eal p ro ced u res , t h at d o es n o t ex cu s e a p art y s e ek i n g ap p el l at e rev i ew o f an

i n t erl o cu t o ry o rd er fro m co m p l y i n g wi t h th e ad d i t io n al req u i rem en t s o f OCGA § 5 -6

-

3 4 (b ), i n cl u d i n g o b t ai n i n g a cert i fi cat e of i m m ed i at e rev i ew. See Ba i l ey v. Ba i l ey , 2 6 6 Ga. 8 3 2

, 8 3 2-8 3 3 (4 7 1 SE2 d 2 1 3 ) (1 99 6 ).

Th e Ho l l an d s ’ fai l u re t o co m pl y w i t h t h e i n terl o cu t o ry ap p eal p ro ced u re

d ep ri v es u s o f j u ri s d i ct i on t o co n s i d er t h i s d is cret i o nary ap pl i cat i o n , wh i ch is h ereb y

DISM ISSED. February 08, 2021C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 02/08/2021
SERVED; DECEMBERS), 2011 

U.S. DEPARTMENT 01- TRANSPORTATION 

Ol'FICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MAUREEN T. WILSON-DOUBEK 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

FDMSNO. FAA-2011-0683 

NOtfCE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 201 1NM190012) has been 

assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and 

other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA 

Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

icr y. 

Chief Administrative Law'Jlidge 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMSNo. FAA-2011-0683 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Atieniion: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WI000' 

ONE COPY 

John C. Doubek, Respondent's Counsel 

Doubek&Pyfer, LLP 

307 North Jackson 

P.O. Box 236 

Helena, MT 59624 

TEL; 406-442-7830 

FAX: 406-442-7839 

David F. Shayne, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW. 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2165 

FAX; 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Adminisiraiive Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use ihe Ibllowing address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building^Suite 

2 W1000, Washington. DC 20591; Anention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

- 9 -
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1019 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1019

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to require a full military 
 honors ceremony for certain deceased veterans, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2019

  Mr. Panetta (for himself, Mr. Taylor, Mr. Crenshaw, and Mrs. Luria) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to require a full military 
 honors ceremony for certain deceased veterans, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Full Military Honors Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. FULL MILITARY HONORS CEREMONY FOR CERTAIN VETERANS.

    Section 1491(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(3) The Secretary concerned shall provide full military honors 
(as determined by the Secretary concerned) for the funeral of a veteran 
who--
            ``(A) is first interred or first inurned in Arlington 
        National Cemetery on or after the date of the enactment of the 
        Full Military Honors Act of 2019;
            ``(B) was awarded the medal of honor or the prisoner-of-war 
        medal; and
            ``(C) is not entitled to full military honors by the grade 
        of that veteran.''.
                                 <all>
```