alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of BG  Financial  Group,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, T. Don
Waddell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



                                             /s/ T. Don Waddell
                                             -----------------------
                                             T. Don Waddell
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             August 13, 2004
Imports and EU Team

Animal Health: Global Trade and Aquaculture Health

Area 4B, 17 Smith Square,

London SW1P 3JR

Website: www.defra.gov.uk

IMPORTS AND EU POLICY TEAM

CUSTOMER INFORMATION NOTE 

API/2012/54 Date: 28 September 2012

To: Interested parties

IMPORTS OF COMPOSITE PRODUCTS

Purpose

1. To advise you that we have published our Importer Information Note and 

Guidance on importation of composite products from outside the EU.

Background

2. Customer Information Note 2012/39 issued on 29 June advised of the 

latest information on imports of composite products.

3. As you are aware composite products are defined in Article 2(a) of 

Commission Decision 2007/275/EC as “a foodstuff intended for human 

consumption that contains both processed products of animal origin and 

products of plant origin and includes those where the processing of 

primary product is an integral part of the production of the final product”. 

The relevant legislation is:

 Commission Decision 2007/275/EC;

 Regulation (EU) No 28/2012; and

 Regulation (EU) No 468/2012.

4. Defra and the Food Standards Agency (FSA) have been working together 

on guidance for imports of these products. These are now available in the 

form of an Importer Information Note, frequently asked questions (FAQs) 

and some flow charts. These will be put on our website shortly.

Contact point for enquiries

SSCI Chelmsford 01245 454860

Fax: 01245 351162

E-mail: AHITChelmsford@ahvla.gsi.gov.uk

Imports and EU Policy Team
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 15-2187

Filed January 11, 2017

KING P. FLOWERS,

Applicant-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF IOWA,

Respondent-Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Stuart P. Werling, 

Judge.

The applicant appeals the district court’s denial of his application for 

postconviction relief from his conviction for possession of a firearm as a felon.

AFFIRMED. 

Jack E. Dusthimer, Davenport, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Martha E. Trout, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee State.

Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Potterfield and Bower, JJ.
2

BOWER, Judge.

King Flowers was found guilty of possession of a firearm as a convicted 

felon on May 6, 2013, in violation of Iowa Code section 724.26 (2013). Flowers 

filed an application for postconviction relief on August 28, 2014, and amended 

the application on December 3, 2014, and July 6, 2015. In a separate motion, 

Flowers sought to have counsel removed. The district court denied Flowers’s 

motion to remove counsel. A hearing was held on the application for 

postconviction relief, which application was denied on November 23. During the 

hearing, the district court again refused to allow Flowers to proceed pro se.

Flowers appeals the district court’s denial of his ability to act pro se during 

the postconviction hearing. He also claims the ruling resulted in a denial of his 

Sixth Amendment right of self-representation and his postconviction counsel was 

ineffective for failing to pursue his motion to remove counsel.

“We ordinarily review postconviction relief proceedings for errors at law.” 

Love v. State, 543 N.W.2d 621, 623 (Iowa Ct. App. 1995) (citations omitted). 

Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are reviewed de novo. Ledezma v. 

State, 626 N.W.2d 134, 141 (Iowa 2001). “To prevail on a claim of ineffective 

assistance of counsel, the [defendant] must demonstrate both ineffective 

assistance and prejudice.” Id. at 142. 

Our supreme court has held the district court has “discretion to deny a 

postconviction relief applicant’s request to dispense with counsel.” Leonard v. 

State, 461 N.W.2d 465, 468 (Iowa 1990). Additionally, “the sixth amendment 

applies only to criminal prosecutions and so has no application to postconviction 

relief proceedings.” Id. (citing State v. Wright, 456 N.W.2d 661, 664-65 (Iowa 
3

1990)). Therefore, Flowers’s claim his constitutional right to represent himself 

was violated fails as that right did not apply to the current case. Similarly, 

Flowers’s counsel at his postconviction hearing could not have been ineffective

as “[c]ounsel cannot fail to perform an essential duty by merely failing to make a 

meritless objection.” See State v. Bearse, 748 N.W.2d 211, 215 (Iowa 2008). 

Pursuant to Iowa Court Rule 21.26(1)(a), (c), and (e), we affirm the district court.

AFFIRMED.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 97 

Authorizing the printing of a collection of the rules of the committees of 

the Senate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 23, 2017 

Mr. SHELBY (for himself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the printing of a collection of the rules of the 

committees of the Senate. 

1 Resolved, That a collection of the rules of the commit2 tees of the Senate, together with related materials, be 

3 printed as a Senate document, and that there be printed 

4 250 additional copies of such document for the use of the 

5 Committee on Rules and Administration. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.0














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kearny Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John N. Hopkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




















Date: February 14, 2011

/s/ John N. HopkinsJohn N. HopkinsChief Executive Officer



















Exhibit 32.0














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kearny Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William C. Ledgerwood, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




















Date: February 14, 2011

/s/ William C. LedgerwoodWilliam C. LedgerwoodExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Chief Executive OfficerCertification of the Quarterly Financial Statements**

 

I, **James B.Hirshorn**, certify that:

 

1.     Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 27,2005 of Sealy Mattress Corporation (the “Corporation”);

 

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Corporation as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     TheCorporation’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Corporation and have:

 

(a)   Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Corporation, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)   Disclosedin this report any change in the Corporation’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Corporation’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theCorporation’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     TheCorporation’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theCorporation’s auditors and the audit committee of the Corporation’s board of:

 

(a)   Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Corporation’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)   Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Corporation’s internal controls over financialreporting.

 

Date: April 13, 2005

 

 
|   | /s/    JAMES B. HIRSHORN |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   | **James B. Hirshorn**                        |
|   | **Chief Financial Officer**                  |
|   | **(Principal Accounting Officer)**           |

 

----
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 23, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 23, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0140. ALTERNATIVE BEST CLEANING, INC. v. ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES -

SOUTHEAST, LLC.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

13A01515
**Exhibit 15.3**

 

IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm’s Consent

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in this Shell Company Report of Critical Metals Corp. on Form 20-F of our report dated November 9, 2023 withrespect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of European Lithium AT (Investments) Limited as of June 30, 2023 and 2022and for the years ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, which report appears in the Registration Statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-268970).We also consent to the reference to our firm under the headings “Auditors” and “Statements by Experts”.

 

/s/ Marcum LLP

 

Marcum LLP

Houston, Texas

March 4, 2024
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

ANDRE TREMAINE CARRINGTON,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 527 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kyverna Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2023 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




|                     |  |     |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | --- | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 26, 2024 |  | By: | /s/ Ryan Jones                                      
|                     |  |     | Ryan Jones                                          
|                     |  |     | Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report, is not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.






---
Exhibit 21


                     BLACK HILLS CORPORATION

                     SUBSIDIARY OF REGISTRANT


                  Wyodak Resources Development Corp.
                      a Delaware corporation.


         SUBSIDIARIES OF WYODAK RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT CORP.


                           DAKSOFT, Inc.
                    a South Dakota corporation


                    Landrica Development Company,
                     a South Dakota corporation


                     Western Production Company,
                        a Wyoming corporation.

 
                             WYGEN, Inc.
                        a Wyoming corporation.


                         Enserco Energy, Inc.
                      a South Dakota corporation
                 (50 percent owned by Wyodak Resources)


                    Black Hills Capital Group, Inc.
                      a South Dakota corporation


                    Black Hills Energy Resources, Inc.
                      a South Dakota corporation


                              VariFuel, Inc.
                      a South Dakota corporation
EX-10.1 LETTER AGREEMENT, DATED AUGUST 24, 2005



 






EXHIBIT 10.1




August 24, 2005




Mr. Vicente Gregorio

Vistamar Marine East, E-15

Granada St.

Carolina, PR 00983




Dear Mr. Gregorio:



We are pleased that you have agreed to assume the position of Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer for R-G Financial Corporation, effective August 24, 2005. Your base annual
salary will be $375,000 plus a bonus of $425,000 which will be prorated for 2005. In addition, you
will be offered 30,000 stock options pursuant to R-G Financial’s 2004 Stock Option Plan, such
option will be granted upon the completion of the restatement process at an exercise price which is
equal to the market price on the close of the day of the completion of the restatement.




Other benefits included herewith are:





	 	•	 	Health insurance plan will be effective immediately. Cost for plan insurance will
depend on your election of: single or family coverage.
	 
	 	•	 	Profit Sharing 1165(e) Plan (you will be eligible to participate after six (6) months
of employment).
	 
	 	•	 	Long Term Disability Plan will be at no cost to employee.
	 
	 	•	 	18 days of vacation leave
	 
	 	•	 	15 days of sick leave
	 
	 	•	 	Life Insurance
	 
	 	•	 	Parking
	 
	 	•	 	Monthly Car Allowance of $2,750




We welcome you to the R-G Financial Corp. family and wish you the best regarding your new endeavors
within the Company.




Cordially,




Héctor Sécola

Sr. Vice President




Accepted by:




	 	 	 

	 

	/s/ Vicente Gregorio

	 	August 24, 2005
	Vicente
Gregorio
	 	          Date
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00071-CV

Becky, Ltd., Appellant

v.

Milestone Community Builders, LLC; The City of Cedar Park; Matt Powell;

Stephen Thomas; Mitch Fuller; Lyle Grimes; Lowell Moore; Jon Lux; and Don Tracy,

Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-14-001293, HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Becky, Ltd. filed a notice of appeal on January 29, 2015, stating that it was

appealing from the trial court’s order granting defendants’ plea to the jurisdiction that was signed

on December 23, 2014. We later granted Becky’s unopposed motion to abate the appeal. Becky had

informed us that it had come to its attention that the trial court’s order was not yet final because it

did not dispose of all claims and all parties. However, the remaining defendant had asked the trial

court to enter an order granting its motion to dismiss, and Becky anticipated that the trial court would

soon enter an order.

Becky has now filed a motion to dismiss the appeal without prejudice as untimely. 

Becky has informed us that the trial court denied the remaining defendant’s motion to dismiss
Becky’s claims against it, and therefore, there is no final judgment entered in the proceedings below. 

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

__________________________________________

Cindy Olson Bourland, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Bourland

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: April 9, 2015

2
#### Rick C. GOTTARDI, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

No. 4436.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

Aug. 29, 1980.

*627Richard L. Yospin, Asst. Public Defender, Ketchikan, Brian C. Shortell, Public Defender, Anchorage, for appellant.

Michael A. Thompson, Asst. Dist. Atty., Victor C. Krumm, Dist. Atty., Ketchikan, Avrum M. Gross, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellee.

Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., and CON-NOR, BOOCHEVER,* BURKE, and MATTHEWS, JJ.

*

 This case was submitted to the court for decision prior to Justice Boochever’s resignation.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Rick Gottardi was convicted in Wrangell district court of hunting within one-quarter mile of the highway, a closed area, in violation of 5 AAC 81.240(1)(A).1 He shot a tame deer on the front lawn of a home in the Ketchikan area. The deer had lived around the home for about seventeen months, often sleeping on the front porch. The owner of the home considered the deer his pet. The judge sentenced Gottardi to three months in jail and a fine of $500.00, with half the fine suspended. On appeal, the superior court affirmed both the conviction and the sentence. Gottardi has appealed again. We affirm.

We find that the trial judge properly denied Gottardi’s motion for judgment of acquittal.2 Under the evidence presented by the state, a reasonable juror could have found that Gottardi was in a closed area when he fired the fatal shot(s).3 We also cannot say that the sentence was “clearly mistaken” 4 in light of the circumstances of the offense. While the sentence was heavy for a first hunting violation, it was well below the maximum.5 Further, Gottardi had prior convictions for having a loaded gun within the city and reckless driving which resulted from his apparent efforts to run down a dog with his car. To us, Gottardi’s ordinarily minor offenses reveal an antisocial nature warranting more than the minimum penalties.

AFFIRMED.

1

. The offense occurred near Ketchikan, but venue was transferred to Wrangell because of prejudicial pretrial publicity.

2

. Rule 29(a), Alaska R. Crim. P.

3

. In reaching this conclusion, we have followed the superior court’s construction of 5 AAC 80.-240(1)(A), which is most favorable to Gottardi, that this regulation prohibits the • hunting of deer within one-quarter mile measured laterally from the highway.

4

. *McClain v. State,*519 P.2d 811 (Alaska 1974).

5

. Under AS 16.05.900, closed area violations are punishable by jail terms of up to six months and fines of up to $1,000.00.