alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 508 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 508

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the conference report to accompany H.R. 3295 be considered to have 
resolved all disagreements between the two Houses thereon as proposed 
by the House of Representatives, which acted first on the conference 
report.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 10, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 508

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Resolving all disagreements between the House of Representatives and 
                   Senate with respect to H.R. 3295.
```
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 589 

Designating July 28, 2018, as ‘‘National Day of the American Cowboy’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 24, 2018 

Mr. ENZI (for himself, Ms. HEITKAMP, Mr. RISCH, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. 

HOEVEN, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. THUNE, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. 

TESTER, Mr. UDALL, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. BENNET, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, 

and Mr. HELLER) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 28, 2018, as ‘‘National Day of the 

American Cowboy’’. 

Whereas pioneering men and women, recognized as ‘‘cowboys’’, helped to establish the American West; 

Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, 

compassion, respect, a strong work ethic, and patriotism; 

Whereas the cowboy spirit exemplifies strength of character, 

sound family values, and good common sense; 

Whereas the cowboy archetype transcends ethnicity, gender, 

geographic boundaries, and political affiliations; 

Whereas the cowboy, who lives off the land and works to protect and enhance the environment, is an excellent steward 

of the land and its creatures; 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 589 ATS 

Whereas cowboy traditions have been a part of American culture for generations; 

Whereas the cowboy continues to be an important part of the 

economy through the work of many thousands of ranchers across the United States who contribute to the economic well-being of every State; 

Whereas millions of fans watch professional and working 

ranch rodeo events annually, making rodeo one of the 

most-watched sports in the United States; 

Whereas membership and participation in rodeo and other organizations that promote and encompass the livelihood of 

cowboys span every generation and transcend race and 

gender; 

Whereas the cowboy is a central figure in literature, film, and 

music and occupies a central place in the public imagination; 

Whereas the cowboy is an American icon; and 

Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys and 

cowgirls to their communities should be recognized and 

encouraged: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates July 28, 2018, as ‘‘National Day 

3 of the American Cowboy’’; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 

6 activities. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
391 A.2d 703

#### Commonwealth v. Wells, Appellant.

Argued March 15,1978.

Marilyn C. Zilli, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Jane G. Penny, Deputy District Attorney, with her LeRoy S. Zimmerman, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 56 

Directing the President to terminate the use of the United States Armed 

Forces with respect to the military intervention led by Saudi Arabia 

in the Republic of Yemen. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2019 

Mr. AMASH submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Directing the President to terminate the use of the United 

States Armed Forces with respect to the military intervention led by Saudi Arabia in the Republic of Yemen. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress directs the President to terminate the use 

4 of the United States Armed Forces with respect to the 

5 military intervention led by Saudi Arabia in the Republic 

6 of Yemen not later than the end of the period of 30 days 

7 beginning on the date of the enactment of this joint resolu8 tion unless and until a declaration of war or specific auVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:04 Apr 10, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ56.IH HJ56

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 56 IH 

1 thorization for such use of the Armed Forces has been 

2 enacted into law. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
NUMBER 13-12-00787-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

RAMIRO R. ARMENDARIZ, Appellant,

v.

STATE FARM LLOYDS AND DANIEL LONGORIA, Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 445th District Court 

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Ramiro R. Armendariz, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered 

by the 445th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2011-DCL05958-I. On April 1, 2015, the appeal was abated for purposes of finalizing settlement 

documents. The parties have now filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal with 

prejudice on grounds that the parties have compromised and settled their dispute. The 
2

parties request that this Court dismiss this appeal with prejudice, costs taxed to the party 

incurring same. This appeal is hereby REINSTATED. 

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss 

with prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.1(a). The joint motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED 

WITH PREJUDICE. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed 

against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the 

parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at 

the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will 

issue forthwith. All pending motions are hereby DISMISSED AS MOOT.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

9th day of March, 2015.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 12 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 12

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   limit the number of terms an individual may serve as a Member of 
                               Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself and Mr. Gallagher) submitted the following 
 joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   limit the number of terms an individual may serve as a Member of 
                               Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No person shall serve as a Representative for more 
than six two-year terms. Service as a Representative for more than one 
year of any two-year term shall be treated as a complete term for 
purposes of this section, without regard to whether the service was 
completed by the individual originally elected to the term.
    ``Section 2. No person shall serve as a Senator for more than two 
six-year terms. Service as a Senator for more than three years of any 
six-year term shall be treated as a complete term for purposes of this 
section, without regard to whether the service was completed by the 
individual originally elected to the term.
    ``Section 3. This article shall not apply to any person who served 
as a Representative or as a Senator during any Congress occurring 
before the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of Ridgewood Energy L Fund, LLC (the "Fund") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.



Date: November 14, 2005   By:  /s/ Robert E. Swanson
                               Robert E. Swanson
                               President and Chief Executive Officer
                               (principal executive officer)


Date: November 14, 2005   By:  /s/ Kathleen P. McSherry
                               Kathleen P. McSherry
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                               (principal financial and accounting officer)

A signed original of this written statement or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
Ridgewood Energy L Fund, LLC and will be retained by Ridgewood Energy L Fund,
LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this report or as a
separate disclosure document.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TAMMY CALLAHAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

WASHOE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT;

et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 16

- 16755

D.C. No. 3:15

- cv

- 00200

- LRH

WGC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 26, 2017 **

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Tammy Callahan appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing

her employment action alleging discrimination in violation of federal and state law,

including the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) . We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dism issal under Fed. R.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 30 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 16755

Civ. P. 12(b)(6)

, Hebbe v. Pliler , 627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir. 2010), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Callahan ’s A DEA claim as time

barred. See Laguaglia v. Rio Hotel & Casino, Inc. , 186 F.3d 1172, 1174 (9th Cir.

1999) ( Nevada is a “ deferral state ” in which claimants have 300 days to institute

proceedings with the ir state anti

- discrimination agency ); see also 29 U.S.C.

§ 626(d)( 1)(B) ( charges under the ADEA “shall be filed . . . within 300 days after

the alleged u nlawful practice occurred, or within 30 days after receipt by the

individual of notice of termination of proceedings under State law, whichever is

earlier ”).

We reject as without merit Callahan’s contentions regarding judicial

estoppel, laches, the continuing violation doctrine, and ineffective assistance of

counsel.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GlobalOptions Group, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey O. Nyweide, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey O. Nyweide                                                                                                                               
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Jeffrey O. Nyweide                                                                                                                                   
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Corporate Development and Secretary (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
#### Matthew LEWIS, Appellant, v. A. L. LOCKHART, Superintendent, Arkansas Department of Correction, Cummins Unit, Appellee.

No. 76-1189.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 16, 1976.

Decided July 14, 1976.

Fred H. Harrison (on brief), Downie & Harrison, Little Rock, Ark., argued, for appellant.

*799Jack T. Lassiter, Asst. Atty. Gen. (argued), Jim Guy Tucker, Atty. Gen., and B. J. McCoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, Ark., on brief, for appellee.

Before BRIGHT, ROSS and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Matthew Lewis appeals from a denial of his petition for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Lewis alleges that his state court murder conviction was tainted by an inadmissible confession, an involuntary guilty plea, and ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

The district court, the Honorable G. Thomas Eisele presiding, held an extensive hearing on appellant’s claim and filed a detailed opinion.

Judge Eisele found that the testimony and record of the court below established that Lewis’ confession was admissible, that his guilty plea was knowingly and voluntarily made, and that he was not denied his right to effective counsel. Finding no error in the proceedings below, we affirm on the basis of Judge Eisele’s unpublished opinion.

It should be noted that while Lewis’ appeal was pending before the court, his counsel filed a motion to certify the case back to the district court so that the court could consider a motion to vacate pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). While we denied the motion to certify the case back to district court at that time, this affirmance is without prejudice to appellant to raise the Rule 60(b) matter in the court below upon issuance of the mandate.
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff, v. Anthony ABILA, Defendant.

No. 80CA0053.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.

Feb. 8, 1980.

*82KIRSHBAUM, Judge.

This is a non-adversary review under C.A.R. 4(d)(3) and (4) pursuant to Colo.Sess. Laws 1979, Ch. 157, § 18-1-409.5 at 670. The sentence in question exceeds the presumptive range of 4 to 8 years plus one year of parole established by Colo.Sess. Laws 1979, Ch. 157, § 18-1—105(1)(a) at 669.

Defendant was charged with three substantive offenses, a fourth count alleging mandatory sentencing for a crime of violence, and five additional counts supporting a prosecutorial request for habitual criminal sentencing. Defendant entered guilty pleas to one count of first degree burglary and to the mandatory sentencing count; all other counts were dismissed as a result of plea negotiations. There were no sentence negotiations. The evidence presented at the sentencing hearing consisted of a presen-tence report prepared by the probation department, testimony of the owner of the burglarized residence, and statements of the defendant. The trial court made extensive and detailed oral findings of fact based upon the evidence and concluded that extraordinary aggravated circumstances warranted a sentence exceeding the presumptive range.

Colo.Sess.Laws 1979, Ch. 157, § 18-1—105(7) at 670 contains the following provision:

> “In all cases in which a sentence which is not within the presumptive range is imposed, the court shall make specific written findings on the record of the case, detailing the specific extraordinary circumstances which constitute the reasons for varying from the presumptive sentence. . . . ”

A transcript of the trial court’s oral findings is before us. However, the statute directs the form by which the trial court must make specific written findings of the extraordinary circumstances warranting imposition of a sentence outside the presumptive range. Such requirement serves to distinguish clearly those findings from findings of circumstances supporting imposition of a definite sentence which is within the presumptive range. A transcript of the trial court’s oral findings does not satisfy this specific legislative requirement. We therefore remand to the trial court with directions that that court supplement the record consistent with the legislative requirement above quoted and promptly re-certify the record to this court.

Cause remanded with directions.

RULAND and STERNBERG, JJ., concur.
**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FalconTarget, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; 

and 

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  

FalconTarget, Inc.

Date: May 13, 2005 

By:   /s/   Thomas Kirchner 

    Thomas Kirchner

    Chief Executive Officer 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



POLYPORE, INC.
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polypore, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 15, 2006
    
    /s/ Lynn AmosLynn Amos
Chief Financial Officer