alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED IN
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS V

April 9, 2015

ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK \y

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS NO. PD-0572-14 & PD-0573-14 \

TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. F10-00433-S & F10-00435-S

THE STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE 282%” JUDICIAL
V. § DISTRICT COURT
PATRICIA DONALDSON § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

ORDER ON APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

In accordance with the order of the Court of Criminal Appeals in this cause, the
Court has appointed new counsel to represent Patricia Donaldson on her petitions for
discretionary review.

The Court has appointed Larry Mitchell, P.O. Box 797632, Dallas, Texas 75379,
to represent the defendant/appellanton her petitions for discretionary review. A copy
of the order of appointment is attahed hereto.

The Clerk of this Court is ordered to immediately forward a copy of this order

and the attached Appointment of Counsel for Indigent Defendant to the Court of

aon

ER GINENS DENTS. S, JUDGE
282° JUDICIAL D. yen COURT
DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

Criminal Appeals in Austin.

SIGNED this 1* day of April, 2015.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Kenneth Townsend, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of McNab Creek Gold Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of McNab Creek Gold Corp. for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of McNab Creek Gold Corp.









Dated February 15, 2006

Kenneth Townsend,

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 60 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 60

Designating May 5, 2017, as the ``National Day of Awareness for Missing 
                 and Murdered Native Women and Girls''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 13, 2017

  Mr. Daines (for himself, Mr. Tester, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Gardner, Mr. 
Franken, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Udall, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Hatch, Mrs. Gillibrand, 
Mr. Rounds, and Ms. Heitkamp) submitted the following resolution; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                              May 3, 2017

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating May 5, 2017, as the ``National Day of Awareness for Missing 
                 and Murdered Native Women and Girls''.

Whereas, according to a study commissioned by the Department of Justice, in some 
        tribal communities, American Indian women face murder rates that are 
        more than 10 times the national average murder rate;
Whereas, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, homicide 
        was the third leading cause of death among American Indian and Alaska 
        Native women between 10 and 24 years of age and the fifth leading cause 
        of death for American Indian and Alaska Native women between 25 and 34 
        years of age;
Whereas little data exist on the number of missing American Indian and Alaska 
        Native women in the United States;
Whereas, on July 5, 2013, Hanna Harris, a member of the Northern Cheyenne Tribe, 
        was reported missing by her family in Lame Deer, Montana;
Whereas the body of Hanna Harris was found 5 days after she went missing;
Whereas Hanna Harris was determined to have been raped and murdered, and the 
        individuals accused of committing those crimes were convicted;
Whereas the case of Hanna Harris is an example of many similar cases; and
Whereas Hanna Harris was born on May 5, 1992: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates May 5, 2017, as the ``National Day of 
        Awareness for Missing and Murdered Native Women and Girls''; 
        and
            (2) calls on the people of the United States and interested 
        groups--
                    (A) to commemorate the lives of missing and 
                murdered American Indian and Alaska Native women whose 
                cases are documented and undocumented in public records 
                and the media; and
                    (B) to demonstrate solidarity with the families of 
                victims in light of those tragedies.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aurelio Resource Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen B. Doppler, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 19, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen B. Doppler 
|                    |  |  |  | Stephen B. Doppler     
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement is required by Section 906 has been provided to Aurelio Resource
Corporation and will be retained by Aurelio Resource Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 23 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 23

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 extending the right to vote to citizens sixteen years of age or older.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2019

  Ms. Meng (for herself and Ms. Schakowsky) introduced the following 
 joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
 extending the right to vote to citizens sixteen years of age or older.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The twenty-sixth article of amendment to the 
Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.
    ``Section 2. The right of citizens of the United States, who are 
sixteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged 
by the United States or by any State on account of age.
    ``Section 3. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article 
by appropriate legislation.''.
                                 <all>
```
SERVED MAY 5, 2010 '••^^rORWION 

u s DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 

FAA DOCKET No CP09GL0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS FAA-2009-0097 

ORDER ON EXHIBITS 

The Initial Decision in this matter was issued on May 5,2010. The exhibits, as 

well as any documents or other things identified but not admitted, normally are then 

transmitted to the Docket Section. In this case, however, an exception will be made. 

In two instances, sides of cardboard boxes, containing various markings, were 

identified at the hearing. One, identified as Complainant's #9, was not admitted, and the 

other, Complainant's Exhibit C-10, was admitted. Because of their size and unwieldy 

nature, a copy of each — duplicating the original to the extent feasible ~ has been made, 

and only the copies will be transmitted to the Docket Section. The originals will remain 

with the Office of Hearings. The originalj^aH'Be'availaBte^o^.alHj^jef^sted parties as 

necessary. 

SO ORDERED. 

Attachments - Service List 

Lichard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 
FAA Docket No. CP09GL0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

J. Mark Hansen, Lead Counsel 

Federal Express Corporation 

Regulatory Affairs, Legal Department 

3620 Hacks Cross Road 

Building B, 3rd Floor 

Memphis, TN 38125 

TEL: (901)434-8583 

FAX: (901)434-8283 

Kate Barber, Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AGL-7B 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

DesPlaines,IL 60018 

TEL: (847)294-7862 

FAX: (847)294-8293 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

(202) 366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: (202)366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
# C_2004094EN.01006705.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/67

---

Removal from the register of Case T-270/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 94/172)

(Language of the Case: Italian)

(Language of the Case: Italian)

By order of 9 February 2004 the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case T-270/03:Ghiotto srl v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 239 of 04.10.2003.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Matthew Mannelly, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 , fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc.


/s/ Matthew MannellyName:Matthew MannellyTitle:Chief Executive OfficerDate:November 5, 2010
#### Ardie Dewayne HARRIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. Billy McREYNOLDS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

Nos. J-80-730, J-80-731.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

March 17, 1981.

ORDER DECLINING TO ASSUME JURISDICTION AND DISMISSING APPEALS

On October 31,1980, the above appellants appealed from an order of the McClain County District Court, wherein both appellants were charged as adults in the district court with multiple offenses under the provisions of the reverse certification statute, 10 O.S.Supp. 1978, § 1104.2. Ardie Dewayne Harris was charged in information number CRF-80-65, and Billy McReynolds was charged in information number CRF-80-61. The preliminary examination was conducted on July 31,1980, when the magistrate took the matter under advisement to consider motions filed by appellants to certify them as juveniles and to remand the charges to the juvenile division of the district court. On September 4, 1980, the Honorable Kenneth Love conducted the reverse certification proceedings and on October 1, 1980, the motions for reverse certification were overruled. On October 6, 1980, the magistrate filed the order binding both appellants over to stand trial in the district court.

On February 4,1981, the State of Oklahoma, through Kay E. Huff, District Attorney for District 21, filed a motion to dismiss these appeals for the reason the statutes do not provide for an appeal from an order denying reverse certification.

In the matters before this Court, appellants request that this Court review the reverse certification proceedings and remand their charges to the juvenile division of the district court.

NOW THEREFORE, after considering the petitions filed herein and the transcripts filed herein, this Court finds that we should decline to assume jurisdic*1270tion and dismiss the petitions filed. An analysis of the reverse certification statute, 10 O.S.Supp. 1978, § 1104.2, reveals that the Legislature did not provide for an interlocutory appeal from the findings of the trial court at the conclusion of the preliminary examination and the hearings on the motion to certify to the juvenile division of the court. Nor do the rules of this Court provide for such an appeal. By operation of law the parties are treated as adults and the burden falls upon them to prove their eligibility to be considered as juveniles. Whether or not such proof is sufficient lies within the discretion of the magistrate at the conclusion of the preliminary examination and the hearing on the motions to remand. Whenever it is determined that the motions should be denied, the parties remain in the status of adults; and, in the event the parties are bound over to stand trial, the trial should proceed.

THEREFORE, this Court finds further, that we should decline to assume jurisdiction herein and dismiss the attempted appeals.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WITNESS OUR HANDS and the Seal of this Court this 17th day of March, 1981.

TOM BRETT, P. J.

HEZ J. BUSSEY, J.
| (1)   | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | /s/ BRANDON T. O’BRIEN                                  |   |
|   | Brandon T. O’Brien                                                                                                                                                                                                           |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                            |   |
|   | August 10, 2010                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |   |
## **Exhibit 31.2**

**Section302 Certification**

I, Patrick M. Fox,certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Seneca Gaming Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)          Discussed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)          All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  August 11, 2006 |   | /s/ Patrick M. Fox             |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|                        |   | Patrick M. Fox                 |
|                        |   | Chief Financial  Officer       |
|                        |   | (Principal  Financial Officer) |

 

----
# C_2004094EN.01002804.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/28

---

Action brought on 26 February 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Italian Republic

(Case C-97/04)

(2004/C 94/63)

An action against the Italian Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 26 February 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by M. Konstantinidis and R. Amorosi, acting as Agents.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2000/76/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2000 on the incineration of waste, or, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 21 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2000/76/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2000 on the incineration of waste, or, in any event, by failing to communicate them to the Commission, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 21 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The period for transposition of the directive expired on 28 December 2002.

---

(1)  OJ L 332, 28.12.2000, p. 91.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tengion, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Nichtberger, MD, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 16, 2011




/s/ Steven Nichtberger, MDSteven Nichtberger, MDPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Form 10-Q of Shengtai Pharmaceutical, Inc. (the "Company")
      for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Qingtai
                LiuQingtai
                LiuChief
                Executive OfficerDate:
                November 13, 2008/s/
                Yiru ShiYiru
                ShiChief
                Financial OfficerDate:
                November 13, 2008




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Shengtai Pharmaceutical, Inc. and will be retained by Shengtai Pharmaceutical,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.