alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## NO. 12

- 18

- 00321

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

BARBARA LYNN ORPINED A,

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 114T H

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Barbara Lynn Orpineda filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by

Appellant and h er counsel. No decision has been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly,

Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2 (a).

Opinion delivered November 28, 2018.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

( DO NOT PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

NOVEMBER 28 , 2018

NO. 12

- 18

- 00321

- CR

BARBARA LYNN ORPINEDA,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the 114th District Court

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 114

- 0656

- 18)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Federal Marketing Orders

Marketing Order Current Assessment Rate Unit

Commodity

FL Citrus $0.015 ($0.02 proposed) Per 4/5-bushel carton

TX Citrus $0.03 Per 7/10-bushel carton

FL Avocados $0.50 Per 55-pound bushel

CA Kiwifruit $0.035 Per 9-kilo volume filled or

equivalent

WA Sweet Cherries $0.20 Per ton

S.E. CA Grapes $0.04 Per 18-pound lug of grapes

handled

OR-WA Fresh Pears $0.468 Per 44-pound standard box

OR-WA Processed Pears $7.15 ($7.50 proposed) Per ton

Multi-State Cranberries suspended

Multi-State Tart Cherries $0.0075 Per pound

CA Olives $35 ($28 proposed) Per ton of assessable olives

handled

ID-E. OR Potatoes $0.002 Per hundredweight

CO Potatoes $0.006 Area 2 Per hundredweight

$0.02 Area 3

Vidalia Onions $0.13 Per 40-pound carton

Walla Walla Onions $0.20 Per 50-pound bag

ID-E. OR Onions $0.05 ($0.07 proposed) Per hundredweight

S. TX Onions $0.05 Per 50-pound equivalent
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FL Tomatoes $0.025 ($0.035 proposed) Per 25-pound carton

CA Almonds $0.03 Per pound

OR-WA Hazelnuts $0.006 ($0.005 proposed) Per pound

CA, AZ, NM Pistachios $0.0007 Per pound of assessed

weight pistachios

CA Walnuts $0.011 Per inshell pound of

assessable walnuts handled

Multi-State Spearmint Oil $0.14 Per Pound

Multi-State Pecans $0.01 improved, $0.00 Per Pound

native/seedling and

substandard

CA Dates $0.20 ($0.15 proposed) Per hundred-weight of dates

handled

CA Raisins $22 ($24 proposed) Per ton of free tonnage

raisins acquired by handlers

CA Dried Prunes $0.33 (suspension proposed) Perton ofsalable dried

prunes handled

Last updated: February 9, 2024
ACCEPTED04-14-00151-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALSSAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

4/9/2015 4:33:20 PMKEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

            FILED IN4th COURT OF APPEALS  SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS04/9/2015 4:33:20 PM    KEITH E. HOTTLE              Clerk
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. 

Before 

GASTON, HOUTZ, and GERRITY 

Appellate Military Judges 

_________________________ 

UNITED STATES 

Appellee 

v. 

Anthony T. STROMER, Jr. 

Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps 

Appellant 

No. 201800320 

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary 

Decided: 28 December 2020 

Military Judge: 

John P. Norman 

Sentence adjudged 27 August 2018 by a special court-martial convened 

at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by convening authority: reduction to E-1, confinement for eight months, and a bad-conduct discharge.1

For Appellant: 

Lieutenant Commander R. Andrew Austria, JAGC, USN

For Appellee: 

Major Clayton L. Wiggins, USMC

 

1 In accordance with a pretrial agreement, the convening authority suspended confinement in excess of 60 days and the bad-conduct discharge. 
United States v. Stromer, NMCCA No. 201800320 

Opinion of the Court 

2 

_________________________ 

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a). 

_________________________ 

PER CURIAM: 

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 

866. 

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED. 

FOR THE COURT: 

RODGER A. DREW, JR. 

Clerk of Court
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JULIE VAUGHNS,

Appellant,

v.

CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1306

[April 11, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Michael A. Robinson, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE-16-

003407.

Melissa A. Giasi of Sivyer Barlow & Watson, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

Maureen G. Pearcy of Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, Coral Gables, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patricia Stroup, Executive Secretary, Healthcare Systems Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 12C-06, Rockville, Maryland 20857; telephone (301) 443-1127.

Dated: April 10, 2012.

Reva Harris,

Acting Director, Division of Policy and Information Coordination.

[FR Doc. 2012-9135 Filed 4-16-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
SAT ReportPMN Number:P-13-0378SAT Date:4/16/2013Print Date:8/30/2013Related cases:Health related cases:Ecotox related cases:Concern levels:Type of Concern:HealthEcoCommentsLevel of Concern:22PersistenceBioaccumToxicityComments112Anion212CationExposure Based Review:Health:NoEcotox:NoRoutes of exposure:Health:Dermal Drinking Water InhalationEcotox:All releases to waterFate:;Anion moderate; Cation moderateKeywords:Keywords:SEVER IRR/CORR-E,S,L,GI,MMSENS-S,LDEVELUNCERT NEUROAQUATOX-A,CSummary of Assessment:Fate:Fate Summary:P-13-0378FATE: Estimations for typical anion,log Kow = -0.70 (E)log Koc = 1.00 (E)log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E)log Fish BAF = -0.05 (E)FATE: Estimations for cationlog Kow = 1.38 (M)log Koc = 2.81 (E)log Fish BCF = 0.58 (E)log Fish BAF = 0.53 (E)PMN Substance: MP< 25 C (E)VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)H < 1.00E-8 (E)POTW removal (%) = Anion 90 via biodeg; Cation 0Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Anion wk; Cation moSorption to soils/sediments = Anion moderate; Cation moderatePBT Potential: Anion P1B1; Cation P2B1*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = Anion moderate; Cation moderateHealth:Health Summary:Absorption is nil through the skin, and good through the lung and GI tract, based onphysical/chemical properties. There are concerns for severe irritation/possible corrosion to all exposed tissues and for dermal andrespiratory sensitization, based on information in the PMN MSDS. There also is concern for developmental toxicity, based onand uncertain concern for neurotoxicity, based onEcotox:Test OrganismTest TypeTest End PointPredictedMeasuredCommentsfish96-hLC5021.2daphnid48-hLC502.7green algal96-hEC501.9fish_chronic value0.965daphnid_chronic value0.244algal_chronic value0.679Sewage Sludge3-hEC50_Sewage Sludge_Chronic Value_Ecotox Values Comments:Predictions are based on SARs forwith molecular weight adjustment; SARchemical class =log Kow = -4.5 (EPI),(EPI); unknown mp(P);; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <150.0mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;FactorsValuesCommentsAssessment Factor10Concentration of Concern (ppb)24SARsSAR ClassEcotox CategoryEcotox Factors Comments:SAT Chair:J. Kwiat
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Thursday, April 9, 2015

No. 04-15-00177-CR and 04-15-00178-CR

Daniel Martinez a/k/a Daniel RAMIREZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR2985

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The trial court’s certification in each of these appeals states that “this criminal case is a 

plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record in each appeal 

contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment 

recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s 

certification in each appeal accurately reflects that the criminal case is a plea-bargain case. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, 

“The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal 

has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). It is therefore 

ORDERED that these appeals will be dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure unless appellant causes an amended trial court certification to be filed in 

each appeal by May 7, 2015, showing appellant has the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

25.2(d); 37.1; see also Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. 

State,110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). All other appellate deadlines are 

SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the certification issue.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of April, 2015.
___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
1 F r om:

S e nt: T ue s da y

, J u l y 21, 2015 1:22 AM

T o: RedH ill

Cc:

S ub jec t: A OC

Fo ll o w U p F la g: F o ll o w up

F la g S t a tu s: F l agged

I t c o m e s a s n o s u r p ris e t h a t t h e N a vy h as r u s h e d t o sig n t h e A OC w h e n i t ' s ob v i o u s e v e r y th i n g i n th is d ra f t

v e rsi o n b e n e f i t s t h e m a n d n o t h i n g b e n e f i t s th e p ub li c.

T w o y e ar s t ud y

, 2 5 y e ar up gr a d e i m p l e m e nt a t i o n p la n

, i n s t all a t i o n o f e ar l y l e a k d e t e c t i o n s y s t e m, i n s t all a t i o n

o f w a t e r t ig h t d oo rs t o c o nt a i n s p ill ( s )

, e t c.

E n o u g h w i t h th e s t u d i e s alr e a d y. I sa y i m m e d i a t e l y d rai n all th e t a n k s, c o n du c t r e p a i rs, i n s p e c t

, t e s t a n d

c e r t i f y. T a n k s ar e all o w e d t o b e b r o u g h t b a c k o n l i n e o n l y a ft e r t h e y c a n p r o p e rl y m ee t o r e xc ee d a l l c u rr e nt

f e d e ral a nd s t a t e 2 01 5 u nd e rg r o u nd s t o rag e t a n k s t a n d ar d s

. Wa t c h as al l f oo t d raggi n g w ill magi c a l l y v a n is h

.

W h a t i f t h e y f o u n d J P-5

, J P- 8 o r m ari n e d i e s e l i n o u r w e lls t o m o r r o w ? Th e r e w as n o th i n g i n t h e A OC a b o u t

h o w t o s t o p th e l e a k ( s ). W h o ’s r e s p o n si b l e fo r s t o pp ag e / c l e a n up

, ho w m u c h is i t g o i n g t o c o s t

, w h o p a y s ? Las t

t im e I l oo k e d t h e Pe n t a g o n h a d a h u n d r e d s o f b il l i o n s o f d o lla r b ud g e t

.

C a pt ai n T u ft s s t a t e s th a t th e d r i n k i n g w a t e r q u al i t y is n o n- n e g o t i a b l e

. W h e n o u r d ri n k i n g w a t e r b e c o m e s

c o nt am i n a t e d

, C a pt T u f t s, h is f amil y a nd t h e r e s t o f u s w ill s t il l h a v e sa f e w a t e r t o d ri n k

. T h e y 'll j u s t b e l e ss t o

g o ar o und

.

T h is is a b a d A OC a n d I u rg e t h e U S EP A a n d t h e s t a t e D e p t h o f H e a l t h t o r e j e c t th is d r a ft v e rsi o n

.

Al o h a

p

. s

. R e gar d i n g t h e r e p r e s e nt a t i v e f r o m t h e U S E P A w h o a tt e n d e d t h e R e d H ill to w n h all m ee t i n g a t M o a n a l u a

e l e m e n t ar y s c h oo l o n J u n e 1 8 t h

. I f o u n d h is e n d o rs e m e n t o f th is d r a ft A OC to b e s u s p i c i o u sl y e n t h u sias t i c.

S e n t f r o m W i nd o w s M ai l
In the Missouri Court of Appeals

Eastern District

APRIL 7, 2015

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

1. ED100651 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JARON SIMS, APP

2. ED100970 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DARNELL CLEMONS, APP

3. ED101004 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CORNELIOUS JONES, APP

4. ED101013 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JAMES STAMPLEY, APP

5. ED101042 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DANIEL K. MCKAY, APP

6. ED101320 CHRISTOPHER PIERSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, 

RES

7. ED101358 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RICHARD LEONARD, JR., 

APP

8. ED101484 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V GLEN SCOTT EVANS, APP

9. ED101516 RICHARD L. BOBBITT, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

10. ED101540 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JORDAN SHELTON III, APP

11. ED101575 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DANTE HARWELL, APP

12. ED101604 IN MATTER OF CARE AND TREATMENT CHARLES 

BOLDEN APP

13. ED101894 MOORLANDS HOLDINGS APP V METRO STL SEWER DIST 

RES
Exhibit
10.14


 


FIRST
AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT


 


THIS
FIRST AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT made this 3rd day of July 2018.


 


TEXAS
MEDICAL CENTER (“Licensor”), and B1OLIFE4D INC., a Delaware C-Corporation (“Licensee”) are parties
to a certain License Agreement (“License”) dated April 3, 2018 with respect to premises identified as Lab Bench J-251-D located
at 2450 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77021- 2040.


 


	 	A.	The
    Licensee wishes to modify their footprint in JLABS @ TMC and Licensor has agreed to accommodate this request.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, which is incorporated herein by reference, for mutual promises contained herein, and for
other good and valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Licensor and Licensee hereby agree
as follows:


 


	 	1.	Effective
    July 15th, 2018, Licensee shall no longer have access to Lab Bench J-251-D.


 


Effective
July 15th, 2018, Licensee shall have access to Lab Bench J-25 l-P and J-251-Q.


 


	 	2.	Section
    2.1 of the License shall be amended to reflect an increase in the License Fee in the amount of $1,000.00 for a total License Fee
    in the amount of $2,000.00 per month.
	 	 	 
	 	3.	Section
    2.5 of the License shall be amended to reflect that on or before the Effective Date, Licensee shall deposit with licensor the additional
    amount of $2,000 for a total Security Deposit of $4,000.00.
	 	 	 
	 	4.	Except
    as amended by this 1st Amendment, all other terms of the License shall remain in full force and effect.


 


(signatures
on the following page)


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Licensor and Licensee have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this 1st Amendment as of the date
first written.


 


	 	LICENSOR:
	 	 
	 	TEXAS
    MEDICAL CENTER
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    William F. McKeon
	 	Name: 	William
    F. McKeon
	 	Title:	President
    and CEO
	 	 	 
	 	LICENSEE:
	 	 
	 	BIOLIFE4D
    INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Steven Morris 
	 	Name:	Steven
    Morris
	 	Title:	CEO
---

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, Mark Lana, of HS3 Technologies, Inc., hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HS3 Technologies, Inc. for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of HS3 Technologies, Inc.

Dated November 22, 2010

|/s/ Mark Lana                                              | 
|---------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Mark Lana                                                  | 
|Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director | 
|(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer  | 
|and Principal Accounting Officer                           | 

---
Vaccines and Immunizations 

Vaccines & Preventable Diseases: 

List of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases 

The following links will lead you to the main page that describes both the disease and the 

vaccine(s). Vaccines are available for all of the following vaccine-preventable diseases (unless 

otherwise noted): 

z Anthrax 

z Cervical Cancer (Human Papillomavirus) 

z Diphtheria 

z Hepatitis A 

z Hepatitis B 

z Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) 

z Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 

z Influenza (Flu) 

z Japanese encephalitis (JE) 

z Lyme disease

Lyme disease vaccine no longer available in the United States. 

z Measles 

z Meningococcal 

z Monkeypox

There is NO monkeypox vaccine. The smallpox vaccine is used for this disease. 

z Mumps 

z Pertussis 

z Pneumococcal 

z Polio 

z Rabies 

z Rotavirus 

z Rubella 

z Shingles (Herpes Zoster) 

z Smallpox 

z Tetanus 

z Typhoid 

z Tuberculosis (TB) 

z Varicella (Chickenpox) 

z Yellow Fever 

 This symbol means you are leaving the CDC.gov Web site. For more information, please see 

CDC's Exit Notification and Disclaimer policy. 

File Formats: All viewers, players, and plug-ins used on this site can be downloaded from the file 

Vaccines: VPD-VAC/List of VPDs Page 1 of 2

http://www.cdc.gov/print.do?url=http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines//vpd-vac/vpd-list.htm 11/3/2009
Page Located on the Web at http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines//vpd-vac/vpd-list.htm 

formats page. (For example: Adobe Acrobat Reader for pdf files, Windows Media Player for audio 

and video files, PowerPoint Viewer for presentation slides, etc.) 

This page last modified on June 13, 2007 

Content last reviewed on May 8, 2009 

Content Source: National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases 

Vaccines: VPD-VAC/List of VPDs Page 2 of 2

http://www.cdc.gov/print.do?url=http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines//vpd-vac/vpd-list.htm 11/3/2009
USDA Agricultural 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.

=——, Marketing Room 2646-S, STOP 0268
aoe Service Washington, DC 20250-0201

SEP 2 8 2016

September 28, 2016

Karen Ross

Secretary of California Department of Food and Agriculture
1220 N Street

Sacramento, California 95814

Dear Secretary Ross,

Pursuant to 7 C.F.R. §205.622, the USDA National Organic Program (NOP) conducted a review
of the California State Organic Program.

We look forward to continuing our work with the California Department of Food and
Agriculture, and the California Department of Public Health in maintaining the integrity of
organic products.

Sincerely,

THOR

For MVM

Miles V. McEvoy
Deputy Administrator
National Organic Program

Enclosure: Final Audit report
c: Natalie Krout-Greenberg, Director of Inspection Services, CDFA

Danny Lee, Supervising Special Investigator
Patrick Connelly, California Department of Public Health
Monday, October 25, 2010

Status of SAE J Doc ’ s

From : Ward Atkinson

The current status on R

- 1234yf refrigerant documents are established in two blanket groups. Currently 11 docu ments have been approved by MVC. Publication of all interrelated documents will occur after the 6 documents in process are approved by MVC. Currently 4 documents are in process for MVC ballot and two are in ICCC ballot status and upon completion will be sent for MVC ballot.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

NOTICE OF INTENT TO DISMISS FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

Appellate case name: James Fails v. Bernice Yost, Special Conservator for Georgia Cox

Appellate case number: 01-14-00975-CV

Trial court case number: 412338-401

Trial court: Probate Court No. 3 of Harris County

The supplemental clerk’s record filed in this appeal contains an order dissolving the 

temporary injunction that is the subject of this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is moot and must 

be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Heckman v. Williamson Cnty., 369 S.W.3d 137, 166–

67 (Tex. 2012).

Unless appellant files a response demonstrating that this Court has jurisdiction of the 

appeal, this appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 

43.2(f). Appellant’s response, if any, is due in this Court no later than 5:00 p.m. 10 days 

from the date of this notice. 

Clerk’s signature: /s/ Christopher A. Prine

Date: April 9, 2015
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: March 31, 2022 | By:    | /s/ Shawn Pack                                                      |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   | Shawn Pack                                                          |
|                 |   | Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

----
Exhibit 32.1**POLYPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.****CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polypore International, Inc. (the“Company”) for the period ended September 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Robert B. Toth, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date:  November 6, 2007                /s/  Robert B. Toth **               **   Robert B. Toth   President and Chief Executive Officer