alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USDA Foods:

Dairy, Grains and Oilseeds Products

Specification Updates

Laura Walter
New Products/Specification Updates 

• Seek versatile, high volume products 

• Align with commercial manufacturing/performance 

based practices

• Packaging and labeling - helping customers use the 

products; perceptions about quality
Products Reviewed 2017

Grains

• Bakery Flour Mix–new pack size and type 

• Tortilla – clarify whole grain

• Whole wheat flour – clarify, add white whole wheat 

• Oats – clarify “quick cooking” type 

• Farina – change package size 

• Toasted oat cereal – individual packaging 

• Whole grain rich pasta in 1 lb box 
Products Reviewed 2017

Oilseeds

• Sunflower seed butter – included Kosher requirement

• Peanut butter - clarify packaging requirements for individual serving 

Dairy 

• Hi protein yogurt- added peach 4 oz

• sliced cheddar cheese - Continuing market research

• mozzarella cheese - Continuing work on meltability and quality issues 
Labeling/Packaging

• FDA defines minimum label information on 

primary packaging:

– Company name

– Company/Plant location

– Food item

– Ingredient list

– Allergen declaration
Labeling/Packaging

Where can I find the requirements?

– USDA specifications –include link to FDA

• 21 CFR 101

OR

– Solicitation language
Labeling/Packaging

• Additional USDA Foods needs:

– Nutrition Facts Panel

– More colorful, “retail”(at least two colors; 

picture/image)

– Easy to open

– Cooking/handling instructions
Looking Ahead....

Updating packaging 

exploring smaller household sizes

colorful, retail packaging

Implementing new format: Nutrition Facts Panel
Changes to Nutrition Facts Panel

https://www.fda.gov/food/guidanceregulation/guidancedocumentsregulatoryinformation/labelingnutrition/u

cm385663.htm
Looking ahead

• FDA issued a proposed rule to extend the 

compliance dates:

– Jan. 1, 2020, for manufacturers with $10 

million or more in annual food sales. 

– Jan. 1, 2021, for manufacturers with less 

than $10 million in annual food sales
Looking Ahead....

• FDA intends to exercise enforcement 

discretion with respect to the current July 26, 

2018, and July 26, 2019, compliance dates
Looking Ahead ... 

SKU Rationalization

 Monitoring trends/products volumes

 When and how to “retire” products 

• low volumes- analyze why

• Updating package sizes
Looking ahead....

• Lead times for product updates

• How to align with commercial best practices

• What contracting challenges might we encounter?
Summary

USDA Foods: Looking to the future

– Program priorities

– Dietary Guidelines 

– Adapt to changing markets/customer needs

– Monitor trends
Questions?
#### Steven Thomas GRIFFITH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-79-679.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

March 13, 1981.

Gerald F. Neuwirth, Lawton, for appellant.

Jan Eric Cartwright, Atty. Gen. of Oklahoma, Timothy S. Frets, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

Appellant, Steven Thomas Griffith, appeals from his conviction in the District Court of Comanche County, Case No. CRF-78-1285, for Robbery by Force, as a result of which he was sentenced to five (5) years in the penitentiary. He asserts a single assignment of error, that is, the trial court erred in failing to grant a continuance upon defense counsel’s request after the state was permitted to endorse a new eyewitness the day of the trial. He relies primarily on *McCollough v. State,*360 P.2d 727 (Okl.Cr.1960).

However, this case is readily distinguishable from *McCollough.*In this case, the witness was not the only witness who could establish some essential part of the state’s case; he was one of three eyewitnesses, in addition to the victim and a police officer, who arrived while the accused was still at the scene of the crime. The existence of prejudice to appellant is very doubtful.

The state contended that the existence of this witness was not known to them until shortly before trial. In addition, the trial court directed that the witness be made available for an interview by the defense during a noon hour recess the day of trial. In view of the fact that the witness’ testimony was essentially cumulative, an assertion of genuine surprise by the defense is not persuasive. In view of the overwhelm*1269ing evidence of guilt, it does not appear that the trial court’s denial of a continuance could have influenced the verdict.

The grant or denial of a continuance on account of a late endorsement of witnesses is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. *Wampler v. State,*553 P.2d 198, (Okl.Cr.1976). In this case, no abuse of discretion is shown. The judgment and sentence appealed from is accordingly affirmed.

BRETT, P. J., and CORNISH, J., concur.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

06-5109

EDWARD T. ARAKAKI,

and HELEN ARAKAKI

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

R. Patrick Jaress , Jaress & Leong, of Honolulu, Hawaii, argued for plaintiffsappellants.

Steven M. Mager , Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United

States Department of Justic e, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With

him on the brief were Peter D. Keisler , Assistant Attorney General; Jeanne E. Davidson

, Director; and Kathryn A. Bleecker , Assistant Director.

Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims

Judge Emily C. HewittNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

06-5109

EDWARD T. ARAKAKI,

and HELEN ARAKAKI,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the UNITED STAT ES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

in CASE NO(S). 03-CV-1874

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (LOURIE, LINN, and MOORE, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED July 17, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7047

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALVIN BASS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-90-352-A, CA-97-754-AM)

Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 30, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvin Bass, Appellant Pro Se. Cathleen Ann Tutty, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Bass, No. CR-90-352-A; CA-97-754-AM (E.D.

Va. May 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 11.0

                     KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                STATEMENTS RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                ------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                   Three Months Ended       Nine Months Ended
                                                     March 31, 2005           March 31, 2005
                                                    -----------------       -----------------
                                                        (In Thousands, Except Share and
                                                           Per Share Data, Unaudited)

<S>                                                    <C>                 <C>
Income available to common stockholders                $     3,826         $    10,814

Weighted average shares outstanding                     70,991,800          70,991,800

Basic earnings per share                               $      0.05         $      0.15

Income for diluted earnings per share                  $     3,826         $    10,814

Total weighted average common shares and equivalents
outstanding for diluted computation                     70,991,800          70,991,800

Diluted earnings per share                             $      0.05         $      0.15


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 21 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 21

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 27, 2019

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make a correction in the 
                     enrollment of the bill S. 47.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill S. 47, the Secretary of the Senate 
shall make the following corrections:
            (1) Strike subsection (a) of section 1 and insert the 
        following: ``(a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the 
        `John D. Dingell, Jr. Conservation, Management, and Recreation 
        Act'.''.
            (2) Strike the header of section 9003 and insert ``john s. 
        mccain iii 21st century conservation service corps act'' (and 
        conform the table of sections accordingly).

            Passed the House of Representatives February 26, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# C_2004094EN.01002702.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/27

---

Action brought on 25 February 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-91/04)

(2004/C 94/59)

An action against the Kingdom of Sweden was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 25 February 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by K. Banks and K. Simonsson, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt, or to communicate to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to implement Directive 2001/29/EC (1) of the European Parliament and the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; and |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt, or to communicate to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to implement Directive 2001/29/EC (1) of the European Parliament and the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; and

1

| 2. | order Sweden to pay the costs of the case. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order Sweden to pay the costs of the case.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which the directive was to be implemented expired on 22 December 2002.

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10.

1

---
J.,SED STqT~, 

S, 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

o ~~ Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

0 

~~Tq~ PROt 'G~\ 

AUG 20 20i2 

Mr. J.R. Stroble 

Director, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

We received your letter dated August 17, 2012, requesting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 

(EPA's) concurrence on the draft expansion memo the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) plans to issue to 

the Central Characteriza.tion Project (CCP) at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). We concur with 

CBFO's draft expansion memo reflecting the addition of Lot 2 waste to waste stream ID-ANLC-S5000 

approved by EPA on June 25, 2012. 

The EPA limitations applicable to the characterization of CH and RH TRU waste are appropriately 

included in Attachment 4 of the draft expansion memo. The waste characterization equipment, 

procedures and processes included in the memo are consistent with EPA's existing approvals at the site. 

Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft expansion memo for INL CCP. If 

you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at (202) 343-9422 or Rajani Joglekar at (202) 

343-9462. 

Sincerely, 

Edward Feltcorn 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable o Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: (Electronic Distribution) 

Joe Franco, CBFO 

Ed Ziemianski, CBFO 

Norma Castaneda, CBFO NT'P 

Marcus Pinzel, CBFO NTP 

Court Fesmire, CBFO QA 

Site Documents, CBFO 

Tom Peake, EPA 

Raymond Lee, EPA
# C_2004094EN.01002201.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/22

---

Action brought on 13 February 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Hellenic Republic

(Case C-68/04)

(2004/C 94/46)

An action against the Hellenic Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 13 February 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Gregorio Valerio Jordana and Minas Konstantinidis, of its Legal Service.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt, or in any event to notify to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/81/EC (1)of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on national emission ceilings for certain atmospheric pollutants, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt, or in any event to notify to the Commission, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/81/EC (1)of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on national emission ceilings for certain atmospheric pollutants, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and arguments

The period for transposition of the directive into national law expired on 27 November 2002.

---

(1)  OJ No L 309, 27.11.2001, p. 22.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

PEERLESS INDEMNITY INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY 

AND WYATT, INC., 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 240 WAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO EMPLOYMENT  AGREEMENT  made as of the 17 day of August,
2005 by and between AEROFLEX INCORPORATED,  a Delaware corporation  (hereinafter
the "Company") and LEONARD BOROW (hereinafter the "Executive").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

     WHEREAS,  the Company and Executive  entered into an  Employment  Agreement
dated March 1, 1999,  as amended  subsequently  by  Amendment  Agreements  dated
September  1, 1999 and  August  13,  2001,  November  8,  2001 and May 13,  2004
(hereinafter the "Employment Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS,  the  Company  and  Executive  desire to  further  modify the said
Employment Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

     1.   Paragraph 4 (a) shall be amended and restated as follows, effective as
          of the date hereof:

          "For each  Fiscal  Year  during the  Employment  Term,  Borow shall be
          eligible to receive an annual  bonus equal to 3 percent of  Aeroflex's
          consolidated  pre-tax  earnings for such Fiscal Year computed  without
          regard to any amount due under this  Section  4(a) and without  charge
          for Acquired In-Process Research and Development and without regard to
          earnings or losses from  discontinued  operations  but with charge for
          stock-based compensation to the extent of the U. S. GAAP charge in the
          financial statements. Any such bonus payable with respect to a portion
          of a  Fiscal  Year  shall  be  prorated  accordingly.  Borow  shall be
          entitled  to  elect  to  defer,   under  the  terms  of  any  deferred
          compensation   agreement  or  annual   incentive   compensation   plan
          applicable to him and then in effect,  any portion of his annual bonus
          that is not already subject to deferral thereunder."


<PAGE>



     2.   Except as  specifically  provided in this  Amendment,  the  Employment
          Agreement  is in all other  respects  hereby  ratified  and  confirmed
          without amendment.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the
day and year first above written.


                                       AEROFLEX INCORPORATED

                                   By: /s/Harvey R. Blau
                                      ---------------------------------
                                       Harvey R. Blau, Chairman & CEO


                                       /s/Leonard Borow
                                      ---------------------------------
                                       Leonard Borow
**Exhibit 31.1**

Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification

I, Rajesh Kalathur, certify that:

​

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of John Deere Owner Trust 2022-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

​

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

​

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing, and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

​

4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

​

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

​

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association (as indenture trustee).

​

​

| 4                      | ​ | ​                                     |
|------------------------|---------|---------------------------------------------|
| Date: January 26, 2024 | By:     | */s/ Rajesh Kalathur*                       |
| ​                | ​ | Rajesh Kalathur                             |
| ​                | ​ | President of John Deere Capital Corporation |
| ​                | ​ | (as Servicer)                               |

​

----
steam_record - Re: EGU NSPS Rulemaking - Extension Request of Westmoreland Partners 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, 

-----"Sullivan, Sean" <ssullivan@williamsmullen.com> wrote: ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Sullivan, Sean" <ssullivan@williamsmullen.com> 

Date: 06/25/2010 01:15PM 

cc: Maryt Smith/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Sullivan, Sean" <ssullivan@williamsmullen.com>

Date: 6/28/2010 3:49 PM

Subject: Re: EGU NSPS Rulemaking - Extension Request of Westmoreland Partners

CC: <Smith.Maryt@epamail.epa.gov>

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C28C499DO... 2/23/2011
Subject: EGU NSPS Rulemaking - Extension Request of Westmoreland Partners 

 <<ROVA CWA Extension Request.pdf>> 

Jezebele, 

Attached is a pdf copy of Westmoreland Partners' request for an 

extension of the deadline to respond to EPA's Information Collection 

Request in support of the EGU Effluent Limitation rulemaking. Please 

contact me at your earliest convenience to discuss this matter further. 

Thanks. 

Sean M. Sullivan 

Williams Mullen 

A Professional Corporation 

301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1700 

Raleigh, NC 27601 

Office: (919) 981-4312 

Cell: (703) 405-6323 

ssullivan@williamsmullen.com 

[attachment "ROVA CWA Extension Request.pdf" removed by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US] 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C28C499DO... 2/23/2011
U. S. Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF COTTON

FOR RELEASE AT 2:00 P.M. CT January 30, 2020

USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of Cotton. The cotton bales were sold under 

Invitation 2020U0034 dated January 29, 2020.

Invitation 2020U0034

Catalog Lot 

No. Catalog Location Purchaser Pounds Sold 

Price Sold (per 

Pound) CCC Revenue 

13 BARTOW, GA MemTex Cotton 

Marketing, LLC. 9540 0.5755 $5,490.27 

14 BARTOW, GA ALLENBERG COTTON 

CO. 38224 0.6172 $23,591.85 

15 COCHRAN, GA MemTex Cotton 

Marketing, LLC. 124291 0.5505 $68,422.20 

17 MIDVILLE, GA ALLENBERG COTTON 

CO. 5994 0.6642 $3,981.21 

 

178,049 $101,485.53
**Exhibit 15.6**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Shell CompanyReport on Form 20-F of our report dated March 17, 2023 relating to the financial statements of Cobar Management Pty Limited,appearing in the Registration Statement No. 333-269007 on Form F-4 of Metals Acquisition Limited. We also consent to the referenceto us under the heading “Statement by Experts” in such Shell Company Report.

 

/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

 

Parramatta, Australia

 

June 22, 2023