alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

October 17, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh 135070 (3) Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. SCOTT WITZKE, #164756, Stephen J. Markman, Justices
Petitioner-Appellant,

v SC: 135070 AGC: 2205/07 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,

Respondent-Appellee.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it is DENIED because MCL 600.2 963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $74.00, shall submit a copy of this order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being filed in this Court. If plaintiff timely files the partia l fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to plain tiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $301.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file furth er appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. The Clerk of the Court sh all furnish two copies of th is order to plaintiff and return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.

jm I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 17, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of West coast Car Company
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending Sept. 30,2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Alex Ferries, Chief Executive Officer of the small business issuer,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the small
business issuer.



/s/ Alex Ferries
-----------------------
Alex Ferries
Chief Financial Officer

Nov. 15, 2006
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 A1 59 4 . J OSEPHI NE BANKS v . W AFFLE HOUSE, I NC.

J o s ep h i n e Ban k s fi l ed a n eg li g en ce act io n ag ai n s t W af f l e Ho u s e, In c. On Au g u s t 27 , 2 0 18 , t h e t ri al co u rt g ran ted W a f f l e Ho u s e’ s m o t i on fo r s u m m ary ju d g m en t an d d i s m i s sed Ban ks ’ s act i o n . Th ereaft er, o n Sep t em b er 2 7 , 2 0 1 8, Ban k s fi led a n o t i ce o f ap p eal . W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. A n o t i ce o f ap p eal m

u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s aft er t h e en t ry o f t h e t ri al

co u rt ’ s o rd er. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). “ Th e p ro p er an d t im el y fi li n g o f a n o t i ce o f ap p eal i s an ab s o l u t e req u i rem en t t o co n fer ju ri s d i ct i o n u po n an ap p el l at e co urt .” Per l ma n

v. Per l m a n , 3 18 Ga. A p p

. 7 3 1 , 73 9 (4 ) (7 3 4 SE2 d 5 6 0) (2 0 1 2 ) (p u n ct u at i o n o m i t t ed ). Here, Ban k s ’ s no t i ce o f ap peal , fi l ed 3 1 d ay s aft er en t ry o f t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er, was

u n t i m el y . Co n seq uen t l y , t h is ap p eal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d i ct i o n. Th e ap p el l ee’ s m o t i o n t o d is m i s s i s h ereb y DENIED AS M OOT.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. March 26, 2019

03/26/2019
1

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

STEVEN MCLEOD )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

 v. ) C.A. No. N11C-03-111 MJB

)

HUGHEY F. MCLEOD )

)

)

Defendant. )

Submitted: February 25, 2015

Decided: April 6, 2015

Upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Allow Expert Testimony by Videoconference, GRANTED.

OPINION

Steven A. McLeod, pro se, 1050 Big Joe Road, Monticello, Florida 32344.

Cynthia H. Pruitt, Esq., Doroshow, Pasquale, Krawitz & Bhaya, 1208 Kirkwood Highway, 

Wilmington, Delaware 10805, Attorney for Defendant.

Brady, J.
2

This is a personal injury case. Plaintiff Steven A. McLeod (“Plaintiff”) alleges that he 

was sexually abused by his father Defendant Hughey F. McLeod (“Defendant”) from 

approximately December 1967 through January 1972. Both parties were domiciled in Delaware 

at the time of the alleged abuse, but both now reside in Florida. Plaintiff is incarcerated in 

Florida serving a life sentence. On April 29, 2011, Plaintiff filed the instant action under 10 Del. 

C. § 8145.

On February 25, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Motion for an Order Allowing Plaintiff’s expert,

Dr. Marianne Barnes, to testify by videoconference.1

 Plaintiff explains that Dr. Barnes currently 

resides in the State of Mississippi. Because Dr. Barnes’ testimony is expected to last less than an 

hour and a half, Plaintiff requests that the witness be permitted to testify using videoconferencing 

technology instead of traveling to Delaware to be physically present in the courtroom.2 Plaintiff 

requests this accommodation for the convenience of the witness and to limit the cost of the 

expert’s testimony.

3

Delaware courts routinely make reasonable accommodations for witnesses in both civil

and criminal trials.4 As a prevailing party may move to recover expert witness fees, including 

travel expenses,5 it is in the interest of both parties to limit these expenses where practicable. 

Allowing Dr. Barnes to testify by videoconference is a reasonable accommodation in the instant 

case, provided that the appropriate technology arrangements can be made between Dr. Barnes 

and the Court, as well as with Plaintiff, if he is not present in the courtroom.

 1 Motion, Item 209, at 1.

2 Motion, Item 209, at 1.

3 Motion, Item 209, at 2.

4 See, e.g., Wilmoth v. Donegal Ins. Co., 2004 WL 78021, *1 (Del. Super. Ct. Jan. 6, 2004) (The Court allowed

plaintiff’s counsel to finish their arguments after the defendant had presented its defense in order to accommodate 

various witnesses).

5 Super. Ct. Civ. R. 54; 10 Del. C. §8906.
3

 Therefore, Plaintiff’s Motion for an Order Allowing Plaintiff’s expert, Dr. Marianne 

Barnes, to testify by videoconference is hereby GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 ______________/s/__________________

 M. JANE BRADY

Superior Court Judge
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SendTec, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Soltoff, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Paul Soltoff             
|Paul Soltoff                 
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)

August 14, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

REAPPOINTMENTS TO ORPHANS’
COURT PROCEDURAL RULES
COMMITTEE :

:

:

:

: No. 805

SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24 th day of October, 2019, the Honorable Emil A. Giordano, Lehigh

County, and Kenneth G

. Potter, Esquire, Snyder County

, are hereby reappointed as

members of the Orphans’ Court Procedural Rules Committee, commencing January 1,

2020.
Transport Transports 

Canada Canada

 TP 7245E

 

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

The following airworthiness directive (AD) may be applicable to an aircraft which our records indicate is registered in your name. ADs are issued pursuant to Canadian 

Aviation Regulation (CAR) 521 Division X. Pursuant to CAR 605.84 and the further details of CAR Standard 625, Appendix H, the continuing airworthiness of a Canadian registered aircraft is contingent upon compliance with all applicable ADs. Failure to comply with the requirements of an AD may invalidate the flight authorization of the aircraft. 

Alternative means of compliance shall be applied for in accordance with CAR 605.84 and the above-referenced Standard. 

This AD has been issued by the Continuing Airworthiness Division (AARDG), National Aircraft Certification Branch, Transport Canada, Ottawa, telephone 613 952-4357.

Pursuant to CAR 202.51 the registered owner of a Canadian aircraft shall, within seven days, notify the Minister in writing of any change of his or her name or address. 

To request a change of address, contact the Civil Aviation Communications Centre (AARC) at Place de Ville, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N8, or 1-800-305-2059, or www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/communications/centre/ address.asp 

24-0022 (01-2005)

1/1 No.

CF-2014-10

Issue Date 

 12 February 2014 

Number: CF-2014-10 

Subject: Main Landing Gear - Brake Hydraulic Line - Incorrect Connection 

Effective: 26 February 2014 

Applicability: Bombardier Inc. model CL-600-2B19 aeroplanes, serial numbers 7003 and 

subsequent. 

Compliance: Within 6600 hours air time from the effective date of this AD, but no later than 

29 March 2017. 

Background: Cases of inboard and outboard hydraulic brake lines connected to the incorrect port of 

the swivel assembly on the main landing gear were found in service, including a runway 

overrun event. Cross-connected brake hydraulic lines can cause the brakes and/or the 

anti-skid system to operate incorrectly. During a high speed rejected take-off, inability for 

the brakes to operate correctly could be catastrophic. 

This AD mandates the modification to prevent inadvertent cross-connection of the 

inboard and outboard hydraulic brake lines. 

Corrective 

Actions: 

Incorporate the modification in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin (SB) 

601R-32-110, dated 19 December 2013, or later revisions approved by the Chief, 

Continuing Airworthiness, Transport Canada. 

Authorization: For the Minister of Transport, 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY 

Philip Tang 

Acting Chief, Continuing Airworthiness 

Contact: Helen Tsai, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613-952-4357, facsimile 

613-996-9178 or e-mail AD-CN@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.
Exhibit 15.2  LOGO Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Shell Company Report on Form 20-F, of SMX (Security
Matters) Public Limited Company of our report dated September 6, 2022, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Securities Matters Limited, which is contained in the Registration Statement
No. 333-267301 on Form F-4 of Empatan Public Limited Company. We
also consent to the reference to us under the caption Statement By Experts in the Shell Company Report on Form 20-F. /s/ Ziv Haft Ziv Haft Certified Public Accountants (Isr.) BDO Member Firm Tel Aviv, Israel March 13, 2023  Tel Aviv
03-6386868

Jerusalem
02-6546200

Haifa
04-8680600

Beer Sheva
077-7784100

Bnei Brak
073-7145300

Kiryat Shmona
077-5054906

Petah Tikva
077-7784180

Modiin Ilit
08-9744111

Nazrat Ilit
04-6555888 Main office: Beit Amot BDO, 48 Menachem Begin Road, Tel Aviv, 6618001    Email:
bdo@bdo,co.il    Website: www.bdo.co.il BDO Israel, an Israeli partnership, is a member of BDO International Limited, a UK
company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the international BDO network of independent member firms. BDO is the brand name for the BDO network and for each of the BDO Member Firm
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 73 (Monday, April 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 22568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9016]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2558-000]


Central Vermont Public Service Corporation; Notice of 
Authorization for Continued Project Operation

    On August 1, 2011, the Central Vermont Public Service Corporation, 
licensee for the Otter Creek Hydroelectric Project, filed an 
Application for a New License pursuant to the Federal Power Act (FPA) 
and the Commission's regulations thereunder. The Otter Creek 
Hydroelectric Project is located on Otter Creek in Addison and Rutland 
counties, Vermont.
    The license for Project No. 2558 was issued for a period ending 
March 31, 2012. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), 
requires the Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue 
from year-to-year an annual license to the then licensee under the 
terms and conditions of the prior license until a new license is 
issued, or the project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 
15 or any other applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior 
license waived the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based 
on section 9(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), 
and as set forth at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project 
has filed an application for a subsequent license, the licensee may 
continue to operate the project in accordance with the terms and 
conditions of the license after the minor or minor part license 
expires, until the Commission acts on its application. If the licensee 
of such a project has not filed an application for a subsequent 
license, then it may be required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to 
continue project operations until the Commission issues someone else a 
license for the project or otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 2558 is issued to 
the Central Vermont Public Service Corporation for a period effective 
April 1, 2012 through March 31, 2013, or until the issuance of a new 
license for the project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever 
comes first. If issuance of a new license (or other disposition) does 
not take place on or before March 31, 2013, notice is hereby given 
that, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under section 
15(a)(1) of the FPA is renewed automatically without further order or 
notice by the Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise. If 
the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is hereby 
given that the Central Vermont Public Service Corporation is authorized 
to continue operation of the Otter Creek Hydroelectric Project, until 
such time as the Commission acts on its application for a subsequent 
license.

    Dated: April 9, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9016 Filed 4-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# C_2004106EN.01007902.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/79 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/79

---

Action brought on 24 February 2004 by C.I. Bieger against Europol

(Case T-89/04)

(2004/C 106/155)

Language of the case: Dutch

An action against Europol was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 24 February 2004 by C.I. Bieger, residing in Zoetermeer (Netherlands), represented by P. de Casparis and M.F. Baltussen.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| 1) | set aside the dismissal of 24 November 2003 by Europol of the appeal brought by C.I. Bieger against the decision of 6 June 2003, and at the same time annul the decision of 6 June 2003; |
| --- | --- |

1)

set aside the dismissal of 24 November 2003 by Europol of the appeal brought by C.I. Bieger against the decision of 6 June 2003, and at the same time annul the decision of 6 June 2003;

| 2) | order Europol to extend C.I. Bieger's contract of employment to 1 July 2006; |
| --- | --- |

2)

order Europol to extend C.I. Bieger's contract of employment to 1 July 2006;

| 3) | Order Europol to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Order Europol to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

In support of her application,the applicant pleads infringement of the principle that reasons must be given and argues that Europol exceeded its discretionary power.

---
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Allan J. Marter, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Aurelio Resource Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;

4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a) designed such disclosure
controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small
business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2007



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Allan J. Marter                         
|Allan J. Marter                             
|Chief Financial Officer                     
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 57 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 57

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT COMMEMORATING 400TH 
              ANNIVERSARY OF ARRIVAL OF FIRST AFRICAN SLAVES.

    Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be 
used on September 10, 2019, for an

              

 event to commemorate the 400th anniversary of the arrival of the first 
African slaves to the territory that would become the United States. 
Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out in 
accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may 
prescribe.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 16, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 57

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall for an event to commemorate 
the 400th anniversary of the arrival of the first African slaves to the 
             territory that would become the United States.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 87 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 87

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 5, 2020

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall for a ceremony as part of the 
 commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to 
be used on April 21, 2020, for a ceremony as part of the commemoration 
of the days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust. Physical 
preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out in

              

 accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may 
prescribe.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 4, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```