alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Publication of the inflation adjustment factor, nonconventional source fuel credit, and reference price for calendar year 2011 as required by section 45K of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. section 45K). The inflation adjustment factor is used to determine the credit allowable under section 45K for coke or coke gas (other than from petroleum based products) for calendar year 2011.

# DATES:

The 2011 inflation adjustment factor and nonconventional source fuel credit apply to coke or coke gas (other than from petroleum based products) sold during calendar year 2011.

*Inflation Adjustment Factor:*                         The inflation adjustment factor for coke or coke gas for calendar year 2011 is 1.1712.                    

*Credit:*                         The nonconventional source fuel credit for coke or coke gas for calendar year 2011 is $3.51 per barrel-of-oil equivalent of qualified fuels.                    

*Reference Price:*                         The reference price for calendar year 2011 is $95.73. The phase-out of the credit does not apply to coke or coke gas.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For questions about how the inflation adjustment factor is calculated—

                        Ahmad Qadri, RAS:R:FDA, Internal Revenue Service, 77 K Street NE.,                               ( print page 22068)                            Washington, DC 20002, Telephone Number (202) 874-5225 (not a toll-free number).                    

For all other questions about the credit or the reference price—

Jennifer Bernardini, CC:PSI:6, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20224, Telephone Number (202) 622-3110 (not a toll-free number).

Dated: April 6, 2012.

Curt G. Wilson,

Associate Chief Counsel, Passthroughs and Special Industries.

[FR Doc. 2012-8754 Filed 4-11-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 32.0




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Kearny  Financial  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John N.
Hopkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Date: May 10, 2005                        /s/ John N. Hopkins
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          John N. Hopkins
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer




<PAGE>

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Kearny  Financial  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Albert
E. Gossweiler, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.




Date: May 10, 2005                        /s/ Albert E. Gossweiler
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Albert E. Gossweiler
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Chief Financial Officer
                                          (Principal Financial Officer)
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00513-CR

AARON CHARLES BURTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 351st District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1330898).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on June 6, 

2014. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised 

by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reversible error. 

Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered April 9, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle. Opinion delivered by Justice 

Higley.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 24, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 24, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0297. ANN CRAWFORD FREMPONG v. YAW FREMPONG.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

14CV6625 14CV10573
Exhibit
8.1



List of Principal Subsidiaries
and Affiliated Entities



|Name of Subsidiary                            |  | Place of incorporation |  | Percentage of equity attributable to the Company
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Cheche Technology Inc.                        |  | Cayman Islands         |  | 100%                                            
|Cheche Technology (HK) Limited                |  | Hong Kong              |  | 100%                                            
|Cheche Technology (Ningbo) Co., Ltd.          |  | PRC                    |  | 100%                                            
|Baodafang Technology Co., Ltd.                |  | PRC                    |  | 100%                                            
|Beijing Cheche Technology Co., Ltd.           |  | PRC                    |  | VIE control                                     
|Cheche Insurance Sales & Service Co., Ltd.    |  | PRC                    |  | VIE control                                     
|Huicai Insurance Brokerage Co., Ltd.          |  | PRC                    |  | VIE control                                     
|Cheche Zhixing (Ningbo) Car Service Co., Ltd. |  | PRC                    |  | VIE control
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WYLIE BILLUPS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D14-4486 

[April 8, 2015]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2008-CF-011478-AXXX-MB.

Wylie Billups, Okeechobee, pro se. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. 

Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Wylie Billups appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.850 motion. We 

reverse and remand for further consideration of claim 10(a). In claim 10(a) 

he challenged his conviction and sentence for count IV, a severed count of 

possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Billups alleges that he was 

never found guilty of this count and never pleaded to it. On appeal, the 

State agrees that the record does not conclusively refute this claim. The 

record does not show a stipulation or that Billups pleaded to this count.

We reverse the summary denial of this claim. The summary denial of the 

remaining claims is affirmed. 

STEVENSON, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0559

SAT Date: 6/28/2013

Print Date: 6/4/2014

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

3 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health:

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR-E,MM,L (UNCERT); AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0559

FATE: 

Solid 

S = Disp.

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption 

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P3B1

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 2
*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Not absorbed through the skin; poor absorption of low 

molecular weight fraction from the lung and GI tract (pchem). Uncertain 

concern for irritation to eyes, mucous membranes and lung based on the amine moieties.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 11

daphnid 48-h LC50 130

green algal 96-h EC50 18

fish _ chronic value 0.60

daphnid _ chronic 

value

9.1

algal _ chronic 

value

3.9

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for polyamphoteric polymers; 

SAR chemical class = polymer-amphoteric-

 S = dispersible in water at 20 C (M); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% 

active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and 

TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

60

SARs polyamphoteric polymers

SAR Class polymer-amphotericEcotox Category None

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J.A. FISCHER, K.J. BRUBAKER, T.P. BELSKY

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

GREGORY D. HURST

LOGISTICS SPECIALIST FIRST CLASS (E-6), U.S. NAVY

NMCCA 201400448

GENERAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 27 August 2014.

Military Judge: CAPT Payton-O’Brien, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commander, Navy Region Northwest, 

Silverdale, WA.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LCDR E.K. Westbrook, 

JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: Capt Michael Magee, USMC.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller, Esq.

9 April 2015

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

For the Court

 

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 14-1286

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

DANIEL E. CARPENTER,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on March 30, 2015, is amended

as follows:

On the cover sheet, replace "March 20, 2015" with "March 30,

2015"

On page 50, replace "we affirm the orders of the district

court on all counts" with "we affirm the conviction and sentence."
ACCEPTED12-14-00157-CVTWELFTH COURT OF APPEALSTYLER, TEXAS4/9/2015 1:54:09 PMCATHY LUSKCLERK
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
FalconTarget, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

FalconTarget, Inc.

Date: April 23, 2009

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan

Serge Atlan

Chairman

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

DARREN RICHARD GENTILQUORE,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 739 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

QINGFA ZHU,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 15-70603

Agency No. A087-824-146

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 14, 2016**

Before: BEA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Qingfa Zhu, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board 

of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s 

(“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum. We have jurisdiction under 8 

U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** We deny Zhu’s request for oral argument. The panel unanimously 

concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. 

App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 20 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 15-70603 

applying the standards created by the REAL ID Act. Ren v. Holder, 648 F.3d 

1079, 1083-84 (9th Cir. 2011). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Zhu failed to 

present sufficiently detailed and consistent testimony, or reasonably available 

corroboration, to meet his burden of proof for asylum. See id. at 1093-94 

(denying petition where asylum applicant failed to provide corroborative evidence 

requested by the IJ or explain why he could not do so). Thus, Zhu’s asylum claim

fails. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert E. Swanson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Energy L
Fund, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



Date: August 15, 2005

/s/ Robert E. Swanson
---------------------
Robert E. Swanson
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 94 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 94

        Designating March 2017 as ``National Read Aloud Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 23, 2017

   Mr. Portman (for himself and Ms. Harris) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
        Designating March 2017 as ``National Read Aloud Month''.

Whereas medical experts have concluded that reading aloud is the ``single most 
        important'' activity in which parents can participate in order to 
        prepare their children to read and learn;
Whereas recent research has concluded that, by 3 years of age, there is a gap in 
        early brain development between children whose parents read to them and 
        children whose parents do not;
Whereas Congress has highlighted the importance of early childhood literacy by 
        including funding for State comprehensive literacy plans and targeted 
        funds toward early childhood education programs in the Every Student 
        Succeeds Act (Public Law 114-95; 129 Stat. 1802);
Whereas, in 2013, Read Aloud 15 MINUTES launched a decade-long national campaign 
        highlighting the importance of reading aloud to children, starting from 
        birth; and
Whereas Read Aloud 15 MINUTES now has more than 21 National Leadership Partners 
        and 10,000 grassroots partners, including day care facilities, schools, 
        libraries, health centers, and rotary clubs in all 50 States: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates March 2017 as ``National Read Aloud Month''; 
        and
            (2) encourages parents and guardians to read to their 
        children for 15 minutes every day because of the developmental 
        benefits that activity has for children.
                                 <all>
```