alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.2**

 

**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|  | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,                and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of                Registrant. |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                August 13, 2008 | /s/                Vincent Colangelo   |
|---------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                  | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Leslie A.Blodgett, Chief Executive Officer of Bare Escentuals, Inc. certify that:

1.     Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bare Escentuals, Inc.;

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

(b)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 15, 2006 |   | By:    | /s/ LESLIE A. BLODGETT                |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                    |   |   | Leslie A. Blodgett                    |
|                    |   |   | Chief Executive Officer  and Director |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofRiskMetrics Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                      The Report,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                      The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Date: August 4, 2009       |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |   |
| /s/ David M. Obstler            |   |
| David M. Obstler                |   |
| *(Principal Financial Officer)* |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aurelio Resource Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Fred Warnaars, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 13, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Fred Warnaars      
|                       |  |  |  | Fred Warnaars          
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement is required by Section 906 has been provided to Aurelio Resource
Corporation and will be retained by Aurelio Resource Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

06/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.44 N 77.04 W Meters AGL
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 76 (Thursday, April 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9371]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. NJ12-9-000]


Buckeye Power, Inc.; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on April 4, 2012, Buckeye Power, Inc. submitted 
its tariff filing per 35.28(e): 2012 TRBAA Update Filing, to be 
effective 6/1/2012.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0b4d4e594844656762656e587e7b7b64797f4b6d6e7968256c647d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5a1c1f081915343633343f092f2a2a35282e1a3c3f2839743d352c">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 23, 2012.

    Dated: April 12, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9371 Filed 4-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-60612

Summary Calendar

RAUL FERRUSCA-VEGA,

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A087 244 014

Before SMITH, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Raul Ferrusca-Vega (Ferrusca), a citizen and native of Mexico, petitions 

for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing 

his appeal from the order of the immigration judge denying his application for 

cancellation of removal. Ferrusca argues that he was statutorily eligible for 

cancellation of removal because his conviction for a crime involving moral 

turpitude occurred more than five years after he entered the United States. 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 8, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-60612 Document: 00512998215 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/08/2015
No. 14-60612

He asserts that the plain language of 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(i) encompasses 

only crimes involving moral turpitude that are committed within five years 

after the date of an alien’s admission and that, therefore, he has not been 

convicted of an offense under § 1227(a)(2)(A)(i) that renders him ineligible for 

cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(C). He maintains that 

the deference normally given to the BIA’s interpretation of immigration law is 

inapplicable in this case because the BIA’s ruling was contrary to the plain 

language of the relevant statutes.

A panel of this court has previously rejected the argument raised by 

Ferrusca. See Nino v. Holder, 690 F.3d 691, 696-98 (5th Cir. 2012). We cannot 

overrule that decision absent an intervening statutory change, Supreme Court 

decision, or en banc decision of this court. See Jacobs v. Nat’l Drug Intelligence 

Ctr., 548 F.3d 375, 378 (5th Cir. 2008).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2

 Case: 14-60612 Document: 00512998215 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/08/2015
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00438-CV

MIKE FARHAT, US GLOBAL ASSET 

INVESTMENTS, LLC, JOHN MARTIN 

FAUBUS, TRACY L. TRIMBLE, MARY 

MARTINEZ, MICHAEL W. BROOME,

AND MICHAEL W. BROOME, P.C.,

Appellants

V.

WILSON SCOTT, LLC D/B/A CAPITAL 

ASSET RESOURCES, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 17th District Court

of Tarrant County (017-308014-19)

April 23, 2020

Opinion by Justice Wallach

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed. We remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings.
It is further ordered that Appellants Mike Farhat, US Global Asset 

Investments, LLC, John Martin Faubus, Tracy L. Trimble, Mary Martinez, Michael W. 

Broome, and Michael W. Broome, P.C. shall jointly and severally pay all costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Mike Wallach___________________

 Justice Mike Wallach
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, each hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(b) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 4, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    Arthur L. Buser 
|                       |  |  |  | Arthur L. Buser        
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 4, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    Kenneth E. Cruse
|                       |  |  |  | Kenneth E. Cruse       
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
MEMORANDUM 

TO: Portland Cement NSPS Docket 

FROM: Keith Barnett, USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG 

DATE: June 30, 2008 

SUBJECT: June 30, 2008 Meeting by teleconference between US Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) and representatives of Lafarge North America Inc. 

Meeting Participants 

Keith Barnett, USEPA 

Elineth Torres, USEPA 

Mike Laney, RTI (contractor to EPA) 

Steve Kohl, Warner, Norcross and Judd LLP (Outside counsel to Lafarge) 

Mike Pelan, Lafarge North America Inc. 

Craig Campbell, Lafarge North America Inc. 

Information discussed in the Meeting 

This meeting was to discuss concerns raised by Lafarge on the proposed amended to the 

NSPS for Portland cement Manufacturing. Comments made by Lafarge in the meeting 

included: 

The proposed PM limit will force different bag technologies which has implication for 

SO2 and mercury 

The Portland Cement Association send the EPA a letter mentioning concerns on meeting 

the NOx emissions limit if you have an alkali bypass. Lafarge has kilns that bypass as 

much as 30 percent of the kiln gases. 

Fabric filter manufacturers guarantee certain grain loading.
FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 4/8/2015 2:50:48 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). A K / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. D A V I D CA SI M I RO BRA V O - CU EV A S, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 09- 10219 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 2 - CR- 0 1 0 0 2 - SRB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona S us a n R . B ol t on, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry16, 2010 ** B e f o r e : F E RN A N D E Z , G O U L D , a n dM . S M I T H , C ir c u it J u d g e s . D avi d C as i m i ro B ravo -C uevas app ea l s f rom the ni ne-m on th sent ence i m pos e d f

ol l ow i ng the r e voc a t i on of s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n d w e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED MA R 02 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSA K / Res ea r ch 09- 10219 2 B r a vo- C ue va s c ont e nds tha thi s due pr oc e s s r i ght s w e r e vi ol a t e d bythe d is tr ic t c o u rt’s d e n ia l o f h is r ig h t to c o n f

r o n t a n dc r o s s - e x a m in e w itn e s s e s . W e re vi ew for pl ai n err or because B ravo -C uevas f ai l ed t o o bj ec tt o the hears ay t e s t i m onyof

the pr oba t i on of

f i c e r , a nd f

a i l e d t o c ha l l e nge the a c c ur a c yof the d o c u m e n ta tio n u s e d to s u p p o rt th e a lle g a tio n th a t h e v io la te dac o n d itio n o f h is s u p e rv is e d r e le a s e . See U n i ted S ta tes v. R o dri

g u ez-L a ra , 4 2 1 F .3 d9 3 2 , 9 4 8 ( 9 th C i r . 2005) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtl i s t e ne d t o the t e s t i m onya nd r e vi e w e d the doc um e nt a t i on be f

or e c onc l udi ng tha tthe gove rnm e ntha d pr ove d the vi ol a t i on by ap r e p o n d e r a n c e o f

th e e v id e n c e . O n th e s e f a c ts , th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s f a ilu r e to ba l a nc e B r a vo- C ue va s ’ r i ghtt o c onf r onta nd c r os s - e xa m i ne w i tne s s e s a ga i ns tthe gove rnm e nt ’ s good c aus e f orde ny i ng the r i ghtdi d notc ons t i tut e pl a i n e rr or b e c au s e a n ye rr o rd idn o t a f f e c t h is s u b s ta n tia l r ig h ts . See U ni ted States v. Si m m ons , 8 1 2 F .2 d 5 6 1 , 5 6 4 - 6 5 ( 1 9 8 7 ) ; see a l so U n ite d S ta tes v . C o m ito , 177 F . 3d 11 66 , 11 70 (9th C i r. 19 99 ). AF F I RME D.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) and Section 1350

I, Stuart
D. Marvin, Principal Financial Officer of Accredited Mortgage Loan REIT Trust (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) and Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                        |  |     |  |                                       
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------
|Dated: November 9, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/  STUART D. MARVIN                 
|                        |  |     |  | Stuart D. Marvin                      
|                        |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Secretary
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Douglas MacLeod, certify that:

 

1.              Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered bythis report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2022-C (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.              Basedon my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.              Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.              Iam responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted inpreparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.              Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance withItem 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A.

 

 

 

March 30, 2023
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

2015 WY 54

 April Term, A.D. 2015

April 8, 2015

VANESSA GRACIELA MORALES,

Appellant

(Defendant),

v.

THE STATE OF WYOMING,

Appellee

(Plaintiff).

S-14-0278

ORDER AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S “JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE”

[¶1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification 

that Appellant did not file a pro se brief within the time allotted by this Court. Pursuant 

to a plea agreement, Appellant entered an unconditional guilty plea to one count of 

conspiracy to deliver methamphetamine. The district court imposed a three to six year 

sentence, which was suspended in favor of three years of supervised probation. This is 

Appellant’s direct appeal from the resulting conviction. On January 5, 2015, Appellant’s 

court-appointed appellate counsel filed a “Motion to Withdraw as Counsel,” pursuant to 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). 

Following a careful review of the record and the “Anders brief” submitted by counsel, 

this Court, on February 3, 2015, entered its “Order Granting Motion for Court-Appointed 

Counsel to Withdraw.” That Order notified Appellant the District Court’s September 24, 

2014, “Judgment and Sentence” would be affirmed unless, on or before March 23, 2015, 

Appellant filed a brief that persuaded this Court the captioned appeal is not wholly 

frivolous. Now, taking note that Appellant, Vanessa Graciela Morales, has not filed a 

brief or other pleading within the time allotted, the Court finds that the district court’s 

“Judgment and Sentence” should be affirmed in all respects. It is, therefore, 

[¶2] ORDERED that the September 24, 2014, “Judgment and Sentence” be, and the 

same hereby is, affirmed.
[¶3] DATED this 8

th day of April, 2015.

BY THE COURT:

/s/

E. JAMES BURKE

Chief Justice
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGING

AND DISABLITY SERVICES,

Appellant,

v.

SANDRA DELONG,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00202

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3

of El Paso, Texas

(TC# 2 012

- DCV

- 04738 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed as moot, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore dismiss the

appeal. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2014.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.