alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 703 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 703

  Expressing support for the goals of Stomach Cancer Awareness Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 15, 2018

   Mr. Young (for himself and Mr. Donnelly) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 
                          Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing support for the goals of Stomach Cancer Awareness Month.

Whereas stomach cancer, also known as gastric cancer, is one of the most 
        difficult cancers to detect in the early stages of the disease, which 
        contributes to high mortality rates;
Whereas stomach cancer occurs when cancer cells develop in the lining of the 
        stomach;
Whereas stomach cancer is the fifth most common type of cancer worldwide;
Whereas, in 2018--

    (1) an estimated 26,240 cases of stomach cancer were diagnosed in the 
United States; and

    (2) it was estimated that 10,800 people in the United States would die 
from stomach cancer;

Whereas the estimated 5-year survival rate for stomach cancer is only 31 
        percent;
Whereas approximately 1 in 111 individuals will be diagnosed with stomach cancer 
        during his or her lifetime;
Whereas, in the United States, stomach cancer is more prevalent among racial and 
        ethnic minorities;
Whereas increased awareness of, and education about, stomach cancer among 
        patients and health care providers could improve timely recognition of 
        stomach cancer symptoms;
Whereas more research into early diagnosis, screening, and treatment for stomach 
        cancer is needed; and
Whereas November 2018 is an appropriate month to observe Stomach Cancer 
        Awareness Month: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the goals of Stomach Cancer Awareness Month;
            (2) supports efforts to increase awareness of, and 
        education about, stomach cancer among the general public of the 
        United States;
            (3) recognizes the need for additional research into early 
        diagnosis, screening, and treatment for stomach cancer; and
            (4) encourages States and territories and localities of the 
        United States to support the goals of Stomach Cancer Awareness 
        Month.
                                 <all>
```
An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Agricultural

Marketing

Service 

Federal Grain Inspection 

Service

Field Management 

Division 

1400 Independence Ave. 

SW, Stop 3630

Washington, D.C. 20250

Voice (202) 720-0228

Fax (202) 690-3951

Hotline 1-800-998-3447

Reference #175 June 17, 1999

TO: FGIS POLICY BULLETIN BOARD

FROM: David Orr, Director

 Field Management Division 

SUBJECT: Switching Inspection Procedures for Unit Trains

ORIGINATING OFFICE: Standards and Procedures Branch

1. PURPOSE

This policy bulletin (memorandum) explains the option to switch 

loading plans during loading of unit trains.

2. PROCEDURES

If a unit train begins loading using single car inspection and 

the applicant for inspection requests to change to the CuSum 

inspection plan without a cutoff, it is permissible with the 

following stipulations. A new log must be recalculated using 

the new agreed upon sublot size (maximum five cars). Each car 

shall continue to be graded individually, however, it shall be 

considered a sublot component. The reduced breakpoints under 

the component inspection option shall be utilized. The 

applicant shall provide a letter as part of the loading history 

requesting the change from single to multiple carrier 

inspection.

Conversely, if an applicant wishes to change from CuSum 

inspection to single lot inspection without a cutoff, it is 

permissible with the following stipulations. Since individual 

car grades are not known, a representative work/file portion for 

each car must be available to be graded. The applicant 

surrenders, in writing, a right to future file sample 

reinspections since file samples will no longer be available. 

In all likelihood sufficient representative samples will no 
Page 2

longer be available; therefore, if it is a domestic lot, probe 

samples of each car must be drawn for grading. If it is an 

export lot, a cutoff must be taken; the cars dumped; and a new

mechanical sampler sample of each car be taken. Probe sampling

for export is permitted only under certain situations.

3. FILING INSTRUCTIONS

Each field office shall immediately notify all Official Agencies 

in their circuit. This policy is effective beginning with the 

start of the first unit train loaded after notification.

4. QUESTIONS

Direct any questions to the local field office or to 

AMS - FGIS Policies Procedures and Market Analysis Branch.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRIAN K. CARTER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

OATH HOLDINGS, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 18-17318 

D.C. No. 4:17-cv-07086-KAW 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Kandis A. Westmore, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted December 11, 2019***

Before: WALLACE, CANBY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 

Brian K. Carter appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing 

his action alleging trademark infringement claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 

U.S.C. § 636(c).

*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 18 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-17318 

The district court did not abuse its discretion by striking Carter’s filing 

challenging defendant’s correction in its notice of removal of the proper named 

defendant, or by denying Carter’s motions for “award of compensation.” See 

Ready Transp., Inc. v. AAR Mfg., Inc., 627 F.3d 402, 404 (9th Cir. 2010) (setting 

forth standard of review and explaining that a district court has inherent power to 

control its docket, including power to strike items from the docket). 

In his opening brief, Carter fails to raise, and therefore has waived, any 

challenge to the district court’s dismissal of his action. See Indep. Towers of Wash. 

v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[W]e will not consider any 

claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief.”); Acosta-Huerta 

v. Estelle, 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir. 1993) (issues not supported by argument in pro 

se appellant’s opening brief are waived).

AFFIRMED.
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 71 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require 

legislative approval for certain regulations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2019 

Mr. PERRY submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to require legislative approval for certain regulations. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 71 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. If one-fourth of the total membership 

3 of the House of Representatives or one-fourth of the total 

4 membership of the Senate sign a petition disapproving of 

5 any proposed department or agency regulation, the Clerk 

6 of the House or the Secretary of the Senate shall transmit 

7 such petition to the President. The proposed regulation 

8 subject to the petition shall not have force or effect until 

9 and unless a joint resolution approving such proposed reg10 ulation and not containing any other matter is agreed to 

11 by each body of the Congress by a recorded vote and is 

12 enacted. 

13 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have the power to 

14 enforce this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
United States Department of Agriculture

Page 1 of 2

Calculating Class III Price

United States Department of Agriculture

for more details, see the next page.

Agricultural Marketing Service
Page 2 of 2

Calculating Class 

III Price: Details

$0.1991 = Manufacturing cost to produce 1 pound of dry whey, excluding cost of raw milk ($/lb).

1.03 = Factor representing pounds of dry whey that can be made from 1 pound of other solids 

 (lb dry whey/lb other solids).

Monthly commodity prices are announced on or before the 5th day of the following month. 

Class prices are announced as dollars per hundredweight. CWT= hundredweight, 100 pounds.

Formula Details

$0.1715 = Manufacturing cost to produce 1 pound of butter, excluding cost of raw milk ($/lb).

1.211 = Factor representing pounds of butter that can be made from 1 pound of butterfat (lb butter/lb butterfat).

1.17 = Assuming standard cwt of milk components (3.5 lb butterfat and 2.99 lb protein), 1.17 pounds of butterfat 

 are associated with 1 pound of protein.

$0.2003 = Manufacturing cost to produce 1 pound of cheese, excluding cost of raw milk ($/lb). 

1.383 = Factor representing pounds of cheese that can be made from 1 pound of protein (lb cheese/lb protein).

1.572 = Factor representing pounds of cheese that can be made from 1 pound of butterfat (lb cheese/lb butterfat).

0.9 = Factor accounting for the butterfat retained in the cheese manufacturing process (90 lb butterfat in cheese/cwt

 of butterfat used). Accounts for the fat lost in the whey stream.

3.1 = Pounds of protein in 100 pounds of skim milk (lb protein/cwt skim).

5.9 = Pounds of other solids in 100 pounds of skim milk (lb other solids/cwt skim).

0.965 = 96.5 pounds of skim in 100 pounds of milk (cwt skim/cwt milk).

3.5 = Pounds of butterfat in 100 pounds of skim milk (lb butterfat/cwt milk).

For more information on the Price Formulas, visit 

www.ams.usda.gov/resources/price-formulas

For more information on Advanced Prices & Pricing Factors and Class & Component Prices, 

visit www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/mmr/dmr

Agricultural Marketing Service, October 2019.

USDA is an equal opportunity employer, provider and lender.
Are you in the business of

buying, handling, weighing, or

transporting grain for sale in

foreign commerce?

Are you exporting grain to China? USDA provides

its exporter registration list to China, per China’s

Decree 177.  Under that Decree, ALL grain

exporters (regardless of volume shipped) must be

registered to ship such products to China. If not

registered, the Chinese government can refuse

entry to any grain shipment, from an exporter,

that does not appear on the registration list

received from the competent authority (in this

case USDA) of the exporting jurisdiction.  

You must register as an exporter by December 15 each year

following the instructions at https://www.ams.usda.gov/services/

fgis/ddr‐export‐registration‐instructions.

NOTE: Registration requirements apply to individual companies whether

a corporation, partnership, LLC, individual, or other business form.  If

there is a statutorily defined “control relationship” defined as “ownership

interest” of ten percent or more, the “parent” may list such subsidiary

entity on its own export registration application.  However, it may be

wise to individually register that other exporting entity in order to

mitigate or eliminate documentary confusion at the point of importation

into a foreign country.  This may be specifically helpful for grain imports

into China.  Further, if a company is also operating out of distinct sites/

locations as a DBA (doing business as), it again may be wise to

individually register that company under its DBA form to help eliminate

documentary confusion with foreign import authorities.  While recent

FGIS review has determined, that a separate export registration is not

necessary for a subsidiary in a “control relationship” or a DBA operation,

the complexities of documentary requirements overseas may make

individual registrations useful and in the best interest of the assorted

exporters to have their names and locations individually listed.  Under

FGIS regulations, FGIS has authority to register these types of additional

entities as long as the export registration requirements under 7 CFR

800.33 and 7 CFR 800.34 are met.

Did you export 15,000 metric

tons or more of grain during the

preceding or current calendar

year?

You are not required to register

as an exporter.

NOTE:  Some foreign countries

have specific import

requirements, so you may

register, as needed.  FGIS has

regulatory authority to register

those not required to as support

for international movement of

U.S. grain. The list of registered

exporters will be published and

shared with foreign governments

upon request.

USGSA GRAIN EXPORTERS

DO I NEED TO REGISTER TO EXPORT?

YES

NO

NO

YES YES
WILLIA M L

. OWEN S :3M > DnjniCT , Ne w VOH K
COMMITTE E O N ARME D SERVICE S

Ai n AN D LAN D Fovea s STBAreci c POKE S COMMITTE E O N HOMELAN D SECURfT Y EMIMIN O THHCATS , CvUnCCUP^TV , AM D

SCIENC I AMD TECHMOLOO V EuemiNC Y CoMMUracAn^f , PUPAREDMS I AN D RESKN M 

# Consrefis i o f tf) e Winitt h ^tatt % $oiu( e o f JKepres(mratJbr

£ Was^instott , Sl £2051 5 September

24,201 0 S10-ll)()^.>29-().V > FIEAS E HESrQN D H ) WASHINGTO

N OFFIC e I— i 334 0 RAYSUR N HOUS E Ornc t Bunom a WAEHir*aTON , D

C 2M15-323 3 130} ) 335^61 1 OiSTHiC T OFFICE : D 12 0 WASHINOTO U STKEEI , Su m 30 0

WATUTOMN , N Y 13901-337 0 (315J7i3-3I6 0 L- 1 1 4 Dunu E STKEET , SUT E 31 0

PLArrsauHgH , N Y 1ZM1-Z99 S 15181503-140 0

Secretar y lU y LaHoo d U.S

. Department

o f Transportatio n 40 0 7t h Street , S W Washington , D C 20590-000 1 Dea r Secretar y LaHood , '-:'^^-: ^

I woul dlike t o expres s m y support fo r th e U.S

. Department

o f Transportatio n Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Devdopmcn t

ProgramGran t

Applicatio n submitte db y th e City o f Syracuse , N Y an dth e CentexStat e Corporatio n for

Economi c Opportunity

. Thi s grant woul db e use dt o enhanc e th e qualit y o f ai r servic e ctmcntl y availabl e a t th e Syracus e Hancoc k

International Airport , a s wel l a s t o attrac t new , lo w cos t air-line s t o th e facility

. Th e Syracus e Airpor

t serve s Central an dNorther n Ne w York , wher e alack o f affordabl e ai r

far e ha s bee n aseriou s andconsistent

issue , negativel y impactin g th e local busines s conummity

. Th e airpor t ha s bee n workin g i n conjunctio n wit h astron g coalitio n o f

local electe dofGcials , economi c developers , an d busines s leader s t o improv e th e region' s ai r servic e for

som e tim e now . Recently , th e City o f Syracuse , i n collaboratio n wit

h th e CenterStat e Corporatio n fo r Economi c Opportunity , applie dfor a$1,000,00 0 grant , t o b e combine dwit

h a$300,00 0 commitment &o mlocal businesses

. Tlu s mone y wil l b e use dt o attiac t new , low-coa

t carrier s t o th e Airport , no t onl y improvin g th e quality an daffordabilit y o f th e ai r service s offereda t Hancoc k Airport , bu t

helpin g loca

l busines s an dbenefittin g th e broade r Centra l an dNorther

n Ne w Yor k Regio n a s well

. I as k tha t you giv e thi s applicatio n you r mos t thoughtfu l an dseriou s considcratio aI f yo u nee dan

y additiona l information , pleas e contac t Madelin e Donova

n i n m y Watcrtow n ofHcc a

t (31S ) 782-3 1 SO

. Sincerely , 

# 0U/(^^x- ^
Bil l Owen s Member o f Congres s WLO/m d

PRlWTt D O N RECYCLE O PAPEf t
# C_2004106EN.01003702.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/37

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Employment Tribunal, Leeds, by order of that court dated 9 March 2004, in the case of C. D. Robinson-Steele against R. D. Retail Services Ltd.

(Case C-131/04)

(2004/C 106/64)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by an order of the Employment Tribunal, Leeds, dated 9 March 2004, which was received at the Court Registry on 11 March 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of C. D. Robinson-Steele and R. D. Retail Services Ltd on the following questions:

| 1. | Is Article 7 of Council Directive 93/104/EC (1) consistent with provisions of national law which allow pay for annual leave to be included in a worker's hourly remuneration and paid as part of remuneration for working time but not paid in respect of a period of leave actually taken by the worker? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 7 of Council Directive 93/104/EC (1) consistent with provisions of national law which allow pay for annual leave to be included in a worker's hourly remuneration and paid as part of remuneration for working time but not paid in respect of a period of leave actually taken by the worker?

1

| 2. | Does Article 7.2 preclude the national tribunal from giving credit to an employer for such payments when it seeks to give to the applicant an effective remedy according to powers contained in national regulations? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does Article 7.2 preclude the national tribunal from giving credit to an employer for such payments when it seeks to give to the applicant an effective remedy according to powers contained in national regulations?

---

(1)  of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organization of working time (OJ L 307, 13.12.1993, p. 18).

1

---
No. 07-14-00218-CR

Richard Harrison Leger

 Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

 Appellee

§

§

§

§

From the 100th District Court

 of Donley County

April 7, 2015

Opinion by Chief Justice Quinn

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated April 7, 2015, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

FILE COPY
| (1)   | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Amerasia Khan Enterprises Ltd.                for the                quarter ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                quarter ended December 31, 2006, fairly presents in all material                respects,                the financial condition and results of operations of Amerasia Khan                Enterprises Ltd.. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/                Robert G. Pedersen, II         |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Robert                G. Pedersen, II                   |
|  Title:    |  Principal                Executive Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  February                14, 2007                        |
|  By:       |  /s/                Brandon T. O'Brien                   |
|  Name:     |  Brandon                T. O'Brien                       |
|  Title:    |  Principal                Financial Officer              |
|  Date:     |  February                14, 2007                        |
Exhibit 31.1

              Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
            Securities and Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Alan Gaines, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ABC Funding,
Inc.

      2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
and

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; and

            b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Dated: May 11, 2007                     By: /s/ Alan Gaines
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Alan Gaines, Chief Executive Officer
                                            ABC Funding, Inc.