alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 76 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 76

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 21, 2020

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
        Education relating to ``Borrower Defense Institutional 
                           Accountability''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the

              

 Department of Education relating to ``Borrower Defense Institutional 
Accountability'' (84 Fed. Reg. 49788 (September 23, 2019)), and such 
rule shall have no force or effect.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 16, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Appellant 

 v. 

JAMES LEE, 

 Appellee 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 10 WAP 2014 

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence of 

the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny 

County entered February 12, 2014 at No. 

CP-02-CR-0014746-2012 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 2015, the Judgment of Sentence of the 

Court of Common Pleas is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe accompanying Quarterly Report of Copano Energy, L.L.C. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2005, I, Matthew J.Assiff, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| November 14, 2005 |   | /s/ MATTHEW J.  ASSIFF                              |
|------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Matthew J. Assiff                                   |
|                   |   | *Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14-395V

Filed: March 18, 2015

Not for Publication

*************************************

SHERI SWIGERT, *

*

Petitioner, * 

*

* Damages decision based on stipulation; 

v. * influenza (flu) vaccine; transverse myelitis;

* multiple sclerosis

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

 *

 Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Amber D. Wilson, Washington, DC, for petitioner.

Ryan D. Pyles, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On March 17, 2015, the parties filed the attached stipulation in which they agreed to settle 

this case and described the settlement terms. Petitioner alleges that she suffered transverse 

myelitis and/or multiple sclerosis that was caused by her October 11, 2013 receipt of influenza

(“flu”) vaccine. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual effects of this injury for 

more than six months. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged 

transverse myelitis, alleged multiple sclerosis, and/or any other injury. Nonetheless, the parties 

 

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this 

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal 

Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made 

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is 

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and 

move to delete such information prior to the document’s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, 

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall 

delete such material from public access.
2

agreed to resolve this matter informally.

The undersigned finds the terms of the stipulation to be reasonable. The court hereby 

adopts the parties’ said stipulation, attached hereto, and awards compensation in the amount and 

on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the stipulation, the court awards a lump sum of

$131,000.00, representing reimbursement for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. 

§ 300aa-15(a) (2006). The award shall be in the form of a check payable to petitioner in the 

amount of $131,000.00.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the 

court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 18, 2015 s/ Laura D. Millman

 Laura D. Millman

 Special Master

 

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or 

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
Opinion filed April 9, 2015

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

___________

No. 11-14-00306-CV

___________

ABILENE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Appellant

V.

STEPHANIE WILSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 104th District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 25879-B

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant, Abilene Regional Medical Center, has filed in this court a motion 

to dismiss this appeal. Appellant states that “Plaintiff-Appellee has Non-suited its 

case against Hospital Appellant in the underlying matter” and that, as a result, 

Appellant wishes to dismiss its appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

April 9, 2015 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
CENTRAL MILK PRODUCERS COOPERATIVE

200 W. HIGGINS ROAD, SUITE 305

SCHAUMBURG, ILLINOIS 60195

Via email and fax

Dana.Coale@usda.gov

202-690-3410 

Ms. Dana Coale, April 24, 2020

Deputy Administrator

USDA

Dear Ms. Coale, 

RE: Set Class I Mover Floor in All Federal Milk Orders 

In the wake of the unprecedented decrease in dairy commodity prices due to the COVID 19 crisis 

we, the members of Central Milk Producers Cooperative hereby request that the USDA set a 

minimum Class I Price Mover for all Federal Milk Orders at $15.00 per CWT in an effort to 

help maintain milk prices necessary to save our dairy farmers. We ask that the USDA make this 

change expeditiously and consider these needed changes as an emergency provision needed to 

maintain orderly marketing and to assure that an adequate supply of milk remains available. 

 

The Class I Price Mover is based on a combination of Class III and Class IV prices, plus $.74 . The 

Class III and Class IV prices are calculated by using the surveyed commodity prices for butter, 

cheese, skim milk powder, and whey. When this system was established, nobody thought we 

would ever be in a situation where all commodity prices would collapse at the same time to the 

levels we are seeing today. Due to this unprecedented collapse of the commodity prices, we 

believe the Market Administrators must set a minimum level for the Class I Price Mover. 

We believe the Federal Order system has some “emergency action” leeway that would allow for 

Market Administrators to take dramatic actions to assure the objectives of the Federal Order 

System are met. The COVID 19 crisis certainly constitutes an “emergency” causing us to consider 

the actions proposed above. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

/s/

Joe Brinker, President 

jbrinker@dfamilk.com

On Behalf of all CMPC agency members: Dairy Farmers of America, FarmFirst Dairy Cooperative, 

Foremost Farms USA, Cooperative, Land O’Lakes, Inc., NFO, Inc., Scenic Central Milk Producers 

Cooperative Association
ACCEPTED04-14-00151-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALSSAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

4/9/2015 4:26:58 PMKEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

            FILED IN4th COURT OF APPEALS  SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS04/9/2015 4:26:58 PM    KEITH E. HOTTLE              Clerk
Potential Hazardous Waste Determination Template

Draft Guidance for Making Determinations

List of Questions Solid Waste #1 Solid Waste #2 Solid Waste #3 Solid Waste #4 

Description of 

Material

Electroplating 

sludge

Spent solvent Spent solvent Production 

byproduct

Source of waste 

generation

Plating operation Printing Auto body repair Chemical 

manufacturing

Hazardous 

chemicals used in 

process?

Yes Yes Yes Yes

SDS for 

chemicals?

Yes Yes No Yes

Potential for fire, 

reactivity, give off 

toxic vapors, 

corrosive?

No Yes - fire Yes -fire Yes- Toxic vapors

Is a chemical 

reaction involved?

Yes No No Yes

Type of secondary 

material

Waste water 

treatment Sludge

Spent material Spent material Characteristic 

byproduct

Production 

process or 

materials fit any 

of the listing 

descriptions in §§ 

261.31- 261.32, 

§261.33 (e) or 

(f)?

Yes No No No

Process used to 

make HW 

determination

Knowledge of 

hazardous waste 

listing

Testing Knowledge Testing

If knowledge 

used, what was 

key reason in 

making 

determination

Review of 

hazardous waste 

listing

N/A Review of 

product label

N/A

If testing used, 

was SW-846 

method used?

If so, what was 

specific method?

Test results in 

operating file?

N/A

N/A

Yes

Insert Method

Yes

N/A

N/A

N/A

Yes

Insert Method

Yes
Hazardous or solid 

waste?

Hazardous waste Solid waste Hazardous waste Hazardous waste

If HW, what is 

RCRA waste code? 

F006 N/A D001 ??
Dismissed and Opinion Filed April 7, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01471-CV 

STEVEN RAY WALTERS, Appellant 

V. 

FIRST GUARANTY MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-05552-B 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By letter dated January 5, 2015, we informed 

appellant that the Dallas County Clerk notified the Court the clerk’s record had not been filed 

because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We 

directed appellant to file written verification he had paid for or made arrangements to pay for the 

clerk’s record or written documentation showing appellant had been found entitled to proceed 

without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that if he did not file the required 

documentation within ten days, we might dismiss the appeal without further notice. In response, 

appellant filed a letter on January 14, 2015 asking for an extension of time to pay for the clerk’s 

record, stating that he would pay for the clerk’s record on January 22, 2015. To date, the clerk’s 
 –2– 

record has not been filed and appellant has not corresponded with the Court regarding the status 

of the clerk’s record. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). 

141471F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

STEVEN RAY WALTERS, Appellant 

No. 05-14-01471-CV V. 

FIRST GUARANTY MORTGAGE 

CORPORATION, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 2, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-05552-B. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee FIRST GUARANTY MORTGAGE CORPORATION 

recover its costs of this appeal from appellant STEVEN RAY WALTERS. 

Judgment entered April 7, 2015.
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 63 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed export to the United 

Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern 

Ireland, and the Republic of France of certain defense articles and 

services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 12, 2019 

Mr. MALINOWSKI (for himself, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. TED LIEU of California, Mr. 

CICILLINE, Ms. SPANBERGER, Mr. DEUTCH, Ms. OMAR, Mr. ALLRED, 

Mr. KEATING, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. BERA, and Mr. CASTRO of Texas) submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed export to the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom 

of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the Republic 

of France of certain defense articles and services. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the issuance of an export license with respect to any 

4 of the following proposed exports to the United Arab 

5 Emirates, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and 

6 Northern Ireland, or France is prohibited: 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 63 IH 

1 (1) The transfer of the following defense arti2 cles, including defense services and technical data, 

3 described in license document DDTC–17–079 as 

4 designated by the Department of State pursuant to 

5 the Arms Export Control Act: The proposed transfer 

6 of 44,000 GBU–12 Paveway II Kits and the pro7 posed transfer of 16,000 GBU–10 Paveway II Kits. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
1.           I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
          period covered by this report on Form 10-K of BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2023-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
  2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement
          of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under
          Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
  4.           I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the
          compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
          the servicing agreement in all material respects; and
 5.           All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
          related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
          included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
    
 BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES NA, LLCBy:
          /s/ Ole JensenName:
          Ole JensenTitle:
          Vice President – Finance & Chief Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 4, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00484

- CV

BUCKSTOP ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC

,

Appellant

v.

Cristino CASTANEDA Individually and dba Thermo Cooling Insulation,

Appellees

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Real County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- 3309

- DC

Honorable Spencer W. Brown, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The appellant ’ s motion for extension of time to file reply brief is hereby GRANTED.

Time is extended to December 11, 2017.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 4th day of December, 20 17

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
NO. 12-14-00321-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

APPELLANT

V.

RUSSELL LEON WOOD,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE

COUNTY COURT

VAN ZANDT COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

The State of Texas has filed a motion to dismiss its appeal in this case. The motion 

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure, and no decision has been delivered 

in this appeal. Accordingly, we grant the State’s motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

Opinion delivered April 8, 2015.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

APRIL 8, 2015

NO. 12-14-00321-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellant

V.

RUSSELL LEON WOOD,

Appellee

Appeal from the County Court 

of Van Zandt County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2013-00396)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the State of Texas to 

dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED 

and DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, 

and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 394

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress concerning

the 2002 World Cup and co-hosts Republic ofKorea and Japan.

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 394

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the United States has developed close relationships

with the Republic of Korea and Japan;

Whereas the Republic of Korea and Japan have been close

allies with the United States in the war against terrorism;
2

•HCON 394 EH

Whereas the Republic of Korea and Japan will co-host the

2002 Federation International Football Association

(FIFA) World Cup Korea/Japan;

Whereas the 2002 FIFA World Cup Korea/Japan will be the

first FIFA World Cup to be held in Asia;

Whereas 32 nations have been qualified to compete from May

31 through June 30 of 2002, and will send some 1,500

coaches and athletes to the Republic of Korea and Japan,

making this year’s World Cup the largest ever;

Whereas the Korean and Japanese organizing committees for

the 2002 FIFA World Cup Korea/Japan have effectively

directed the preparations for unprecedented security precautions in both host nations;

Whereas during the 2002 FIFA World Cup Korea/Japan, billions of people are expected to view the competition;

Whereas the co-hosting of the FIFA World Cup by the Republic of Korea and Japan symbolizes the friendly relations between the two host nations, both key allies of the

United States; and

Whereas the co-hosting of this international sporting event

contributes to enhancing peace and stability in Northeast

Asia: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress—

3 (1) appreciates the mutually beneficial relation4 ship between the United States and the Republic of

5 Korea and the United States and Japan;

6 (2) commends the Republic of Korea/Japan

7 2002 FIFA World Cup organizers for the attention
3

•HCON 394 EH

1 they have given to security precautions during the

2 event; and

3 (3) recognizes and applauds the cooperation of

4 the President of the Republic of Korea, Kim Dae5 jung, and the Prime Minister of Japan, Junichiro

6 Koizumi, in the hosting of the largest and most

7 widely viewed World Cup competition in the history

8 of the sport.

Passed the House of Representatives June 11, 2002.

Attest:

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 22789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9195]



[[Page 22789]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0262]


Withdrawal of Approval of Part of a New Animal Drug Application; 
Tiamulin

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is withdrawing approval 
of those parts of a new animal drug application (NADA) for a tiamulin 
Type A medicated article that pertain to the production indications for 
use of increased rate of weight gain and improved feed efficiency in 
swine. This action is being taken at the sponsor's request because this 
product is no longer marketed for these uses.

DATES: Withdrawal of approval is effective April 17, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy L. Burnsteel, Center for 
Veterinary Medicine (HFV-130), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 
Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 240-276-8341, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7112181f15085f1304031f020514141d311715105f1919025f161e07"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dab9b3b4bea3f4b8afa8b4a9aebfbfb69abcbebbf4b2b2a9f4bdb5ac">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Novartis Animal Health US, Inc. (Novartis), 
3200 Northline Ave., suite 300, Greensboro, NC 27408, has requested 
that FDA withdraw approval of those parts of NADA 139-472 for DENAGARD 
(tiamulin) Type A medicated article pertaining to the production 
indications for use of increased rate of weight gain and improved feed 
efficiency in swine. Novartis requested voluntary withdrawal of 
approval of these indications for use because this product is no longer 
marketed for these uses. Revised product labeling reflecting the 
withdrawal of these indications has been approved in a supplement to 
NADA 139-472.
    Therefore, under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food 
and Drugs and redelegated to the Director of the Center for Veterinary 
Medicine, and in accordance with Sec.  514.116 Notice of withdrawal of 
approval of application (21 CFR 514.116), notice is given that approval 
of those parts of NADA 139-472 pertaining to the production indications 
for use of increased rate of weight gain and improved feed efficiency 
in swine are hereby withdrawn, effective April 17, 2012.
    Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is amending 
the animal drug regulations to reflect the withdrawal of approval of 
those parts of NADA 139-472.

    Dated: March 21, 2012.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 2012-9195 Filed 4-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>