HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 MTD093291599 HRS DOCUMENTATION RECORD--REVIEW COVER SHEET

Name of Site: ACM Smelter and Refinery

EPA ID No.: MTD093291599

Contact Persons

Site Investigation: URS Operating Services for EPA (303) 296-3523

1099 18 th Street

Suite 710 Denver, Colorado 80202

Documentation Record: Sabrina Forrest (303) 312-6484

NPL Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street, Mail Code: 8EPR-B Denver, Colorado 80202

Pathways, Components, or Threats Not Scored

Ground Water Migration Pathway

Based on lack of analytical data supporting a release to the aquifers and on the fact that the ground water is not used as a drinking water source, the ground water pathway will not be scored as part of this Hazard Ranking System (HRS) package.

Air Migration Pathway Documentation of investigations from over 100 years ago conducted by the Boston and Montana Consolidated Copper and Silver Mining Company (B oston & Montana) and later by Anaconda Copper Mining Company (ACM) indicates that the operators of the smelter and refinery were aware that a significant amount of contamination was being emitted by the stack. Topsoil samples were collected and analyzed by the Boston & Montana laboratory in 1904 and 1905. Comp any chemists concluded that over 40 pounds of arsenic trioxide (As 2 0 3 ) had been deposited per acre up to a distance of 6.24 miles to the northeast of the stack (Ref.32, p. 2). Samples collected from different locations in 1905 confirmed the aerial deposition of contaminates from the stack (Ref. 47, p. 2). Inte rnal ACM company correspondence from November 1951 indicated that the amount of arsenic leaving the stack per twenty-four hours in the early 1950s was approximately 15.04 pounds (Ref. 33).

The EPA chooses not to score the Air Migration Pathway at this time; however the EPA is interested in this potential pathway and may choose to pursue it further at a later date.HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 1 - MTD093291599 HRS DOCUMENTATION RECORD

Name of Site : ACM Smelter and Refinery

Date Prepared : March 2011

EPA Region : Region 8

Street Address of Site : River Road North, 1 mile East of 15 th Street

City, County, State : Black Eagle, Cascade County, Montana 59414

* General Location in the State : The ACM Smelter and Refinery and the community of Black Eagle are located on the north bank of the Missouri River, north of Great Falls, Montana (Ref. 3; Ref. 4).

Topographic Map : Northwest Great Falls, Montana 1994 and Northeast Great Falls, Montana

Latitude : 47 ° 31’ 42.97” North Longitude : 111 ° 14’ 47.28” West (Ref. 3; Ref. 4)

The location of the reference point at the East Ditch Dump near the south boundary

of the former smelter facility close to the Missouri River.

Scores

Ground Water Pathway 0.00 Surface Water Pathway 100.00 Soil Exposure Pathway 42.15 Air Pathway 0.00

HRS SITE SCORE 54.26

*The street address, coordinates, and contaminant locati ons presented in this HRS documentation record identify the general area the site is located. They represent one or more locations EPA considers to be part of the site based on the screening information EPA used to evaluate the site for NPL listing. EPA lists national priorities among the known “releases or threatened releases” of hazardous substances; thus, the focus is on the release, not precisely delineated

boundaries. A site is defined as where a ha zardous substance has been “deposited, stored, placed or otherwise come to be located.” Generally, HRS scoring and the subsequent listing of a release merely represent the initial determination that a certain area may need to be addressed under CERCLA. Accordi ngly, EPA contemplates that the preliminary description of facility boundaries at the time of scoring will be refine d as more information is developed as to where the

contamination has come to be located.HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 2 - MTD093291599 WORKSHEET FOR COMPUTING HRS SITE SCORE

S S 2

1. Ground water Migration Pathway Score (S gw ) NS NS (from Table 3-1, line 13)

2a. Surface Water Overland/Flood Migration Component 100 (from Table 4-1, line 30)

2b. Ground water to Surface Water Migration Component NS (from Table 4-25, line 28)

2c. Surface Water Migration Pathway Score (S

sw ) 100 10,000.00 Enter the larger of lines 2a and 2b as the pathway score.

3. Soil Exposure Pathway Score (S

s ) 42.15 1,776.62 (from Table 5-1, line 22)

4. Air Migration Pathway Score (S

a ) (from Table 6-1, line 12) NS NS

5. Total of S gw 2 + S

sw 2 + S

s 2 + S

a 2 11,776.62

6. HRS Site Score Divide the value on line 5 by 4 and take the square root 54.26

NS = Not ScoredHRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 3 - MTD093291599 SURFACE WATER OVERLAND/FLOOD MIGRATION COMPONENT SCORE SHEET

Factor Categories and Factors Maximum

Value Value Assigned

Drinking Water Threat

Likelihood of Release : 1. Observed Release 2. Potential to Release by Overland Flow:

2a. Containment

2b. Runoff

2c. Distance to Surface Water 2d. Potential to Release by Overland Flow (lines 2a[2b+2c]) 3. Potential to Release by Flood: 3a. Containment (Flood) 3b. Flood Frequency 3c. Potential to Release by Flood (lines 3a × b) 4. Potential to Release (lines 2d+3c, subject to a maximum of 500) 5. Likelihood of Release (higher of lines 1 and 4) 550

10

25

25

500

10

50

500

500

550 550

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

550

Waste Characteristics : 6. Toxicity/Persistence 7. Hazardous Waste Quantity

8. Waste Characteristics (a) (a)

100 NS

NS

NS

Targets : 9. Nearest Intake 10. Population

10a. Level I Concentrations

10b. Level II Concentrations

10c. Potential Contamination 10d. Population (lines 10a+10b+10c)

11. Resources 12. Targets (lines 9+10d+11) 50

(b) (b) (b) (b)

5 (b) NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Drinking Water Threat Score : 13. Drinking Water Threat Score ([lines 5 × 8 × 12]/82,500, subject to a maximum of 100) 100 NS

Human Food Chain Threat

Likelihood of Release : 14. Likelihood of Release (same value as line 5) 550 550

Waste Characteristics : 15. Toxicity/Persistence/Bioaccumulation 16. Hazardous Waste Quantity

17. Waste Characteristics (a) (a) 1,000 500,000,000

100

320HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 4 - MTD093291599 SURFACE WATER OVERLAND/FLOOD MIGRATION COMPONENT SCORE SHEET

Factor Categories and Factors Maximum

Value Value Assigned

Targets : 18. Food Chain Individual 19. Population

19a. Level I Concentrations

19b. Level II Concentrations

19c. Potential Human Food Chain Contamination 19d. Population (lines 19a+19b+19c) 20. Targets (lines 18+19d) 50

(b) (b) (b) (b) (b) 45

0

0.03

0.000003

0.030003

45.030003

Human Food Chain Threat Score : 21. Human Food Chain Threat Score ([lines 14 × 17 × 20]/82,500, subject to a maximum of 100) 100 96.06

Environmental Threat

Likelihood of Release : 22. Likelihood of Release (same value as line 5) 550 550

Waste Characteristics : 23. Ecosystem Toxicity/Persistence/Bioaccumulation 24. Hazardous Waste Quantity

25. Waste Characteristics (a) (a) 1,000 500,000,000

100

320

Targets : 26. Sensitive Environments

26a. Level I Concentrations

26b. Level II Concentrations

26c. Potential Contamination 26d. Sensitive Environments (lines 26a+26b+26c) 27. Targets (value from line 26d) (b) (b) (b) (b) (b) 0

25

0

25

25

Environmental Threat Score : 28. Environmental Threat Score ( [lines 22 × 25 × 27]/82,500, subject to a maximum of 60) 60 53.33

Surface Water Overland/Flood Migratio n Component Score for a Watershed

29. Watershed Score (lines 13+21+28, subject to a maximum of 100)

100 100

Surface Water Overland/Flood Migration Component Score

30. Component Score (S of ) c (highest score from line 29 for all watersheds evaluated, subject to a maximum of 100) 100 100

NS = Not Scored. (a) = Maximum value applies to waste characteristics category (b) = Maximum value not applicable (c) = Do not round to the nearest integerHRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 5 - MTD093291599 TABLE 5-1

SOIL EXPOSURE PATHWAY SCORE SHEET

Factor Categories and Factors Maximum Value Value Assigned

RESIDENT POPULATION THREAT

Likelihood of Exposure

1. Likelihood of Exposure 550 550

Waste Characteristics

2. Toxicity (a) 10,000
3. Hazardous Waste Quantity (a) 10

4. Waste Characteristics 100 18

Targets

5. Resident Individual 50 50
6. Resident Population

6a. Level I Concentrations (b) 192.8

6b. Level II Concentrations (b) 108.45
6c. Resident Population (lines 6a + 6b) (b)

301.25

7. Workers 15 0

8. Resources 5 0

9. Terrestrial Sensitive Environments (c) 0
10. Targets (lines 5 + 6c + 7 + 8 + 9) (b) 351.25

Resident Population Threat Score

11. Resident Population Threat (lines 1 x 4 x 10) (b) 3,477,375HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 6 - MTD093291599 TABLE 5-1

SOIL EXPOSURE PATHWAY SCORE SHEET

Factor Categories and Factors Maximum Value Value Assigned

NEARBY POPULATION THREAT

Likelihood of Exposure

12. Attractiveness/Accessibility 100 NS

13. Area of Contamination 100 NS
14. Likelihood of Exposure 500 NS

Waste Characteristics

15. Toxicity (a) NS

16. Hazardous Waste Quantity (a) NS

17. Waste Characteristics 100 NS

Targets

18. Nearby Individual 1 NS
19. Population Within 1 Mile (b) NS
20. Targets (lines 18 + 19)

Nearby Population Threat Score

21. Nearby Population Threat (lines 14 x 17 x 20) (b) NS

SOIL EXPOSURE PATHWAY SCORE

Soil Exposure Pathway Score d

22. (S

s ), (lines [11 + 21] ÷ 82,500 subject to a maximum of 100) 42.151Created: January 24, 2011 3:22:45 PM Drawn by: Jeremiah_Ervin File: T:\START3\AMC Great Falls -ESI\GIS\Projects\2011\HRS_Doc_Addons\Figure1_ACM_Refinery_Site.mxd

AGFSED2 AGFSED3 AGFSED4 AGFSED5AGFSED1/AGFSED9PPE#1PPE#2PPE#3PPE#4PPE#5 

### Black Eagle Anaconda Golf Course

Bob Speck Municipal Golf Course

Black Eagle Dam



### Great Falls15th Street (US 87)

Montana Refining Company PPE#6

Missouri River Source#3

Source#1 Source#2

Source#4PPE#7 Location of Direct Observation of Slag/Slime Samples

UOS - START 3
TDD No. 0902-05 Figure 1: ACM Smelter & Refinery Site

January 2011

Source: http://nris.mt.gov/nsdi/orthophotos/naip_2005

0 0.25 0.5 0.125 Miles 

# I Legend

! . Background Sediment Sample Location

! . Release Sediment Sample Locationx

Probable Point of Entry (PPE)

General Area of Soil Contamination

Wetlands (from U.S.D.I. F&WS 1996, 2001 - Ref 35, 2 Sheets)1Created: January 27, 2011 10:56:37 AM Drawn by: Jeremiah_Ervin File: T:\START3\AMC Great Falls - ESI\GIS\Projects\2011\HRS_Doc_Addons\Figure2_2007_2008_3XCLP_ResSoil.mxd



### Black Eagle Legend

! . Source 1/AOC Sample Location

UOS - START 3
TDD No. 0902-05 January 2011

Source: BING Maps/Aerial Hybrid 0 600 1,200 300 Feet 

# I Figure 2: 2007/2008 CLP Residential Soil Samples where Arsenic, Cadmium, & Lead are Greater than Three Times Background 

## Missouri RiverHRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 9 - MTD093291599 REFERENCES

Ref.

No. Description of the Reference

1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Hazard Ranking System; Final Rule, December 14, 1990, 55 FR 51532, Hazard Ranking System (HRS). 137 pages.

2 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Superfund Chemical Data Matrix, Hazardous Substance Reference Table. January 2004. Excerpt, 52 pages. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/hrsres/tools/scdm.htm.

3 URS Operating Services. 2010. Memorandum to file , from Jeremiah Ervin, URS Operating Services, Inc. Subject: Latitude and Longitude of the Form er Anaconda Mining Company Refinery East Ditch Dump Adjacent to Missouri River in the Community of Black Eagle, Montana and Attached Map. January 28, 2010. 2 pages.

4 U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 1975. 7.5' Series Topographic Maps. Map 1-Northwest Great Falls, Montana (1994) and Map 2-Northeast Great Falls, Montana (1975), 2 Maps.

5 URS Operating Service, Inc. 2008a. Analytical Results Report for CERCLA Expanded Site Investigation. Anaconda Minerals Co, Great Falls Refinery, Great Falls, Montana. December 31,

2008. 96 pages. Excerpts Appendix A, 53 pages. Excerpts Appendix B, 21 pages. Excerpts Appendix C, 173 pages. Excerpts Appendix D, 59 pages. Excerpts Appendix E, 13 pages.

6 Montana , The Magazine of Western History. 2001. “The Goldfish Died”. By Gorden Morris

Bakken and J. Elwood Bakken. Wint er 2001. Volume 51, Number 4. Pages: table of contents, 38-46

and 49-51.

7 Great Falls Tribune . 2002. “A Brief History of the Smelter Hill.” Research done by Cascade County Attorney’s Office. February 22, 2002. page 5A.

8 Great Falls Tribune . 2002. “The Rise and Fall of the World’s Tallest Smokestack”. By Tak é Uda and Paula Wilmot. September 18, 2002. pages 6A-7A.

9 Great Falls Tribune . 1982. “The Big Stack”. Monument of Strength by Tom Kerin. 56 pages. Excerpt pages: cover page, ta ble of contents, 15 and 20.

10 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology. 2002. Geologic Map of the Great Falls North 30’ x 60” Quadrangle, Central Montana. Compiled by Su san M. Vuke, Roger B. Golton, and David S. Fullerton. Open File Report No. 459. 1 map.

11 Reference Reserved.

12 Reference Reserved.

13 U.S. Geological Survey, National Water Informati on System: Web Interface. Water Data Report for 2008. USGS 06090300 Missouri River near Great Falls, Montana. Website accessed on July 6, 2009. http://wdr.water.usgs.gov/wy2008/pdfs/06090300.2008.pdf. 3 pages.

14 Letter to E. P. Mathewson from Manager of Bost on and Montana Smelter. April 20, 1907. 1 page.HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 10 - MTD093291599 15 Letter to C. W. Goodale from Boston and Montana Legal Department. February 6, 1909. Three

pages.

16. Montana Department of Environmental Quality , Remediation Division. 2002. Site Inspection Report. May 28, 2002. 31 pages.

17 Letter to J.H. Klepinger from Milo W. Krejer. 1914. Subject Slime Samples Takes Above Rainbow Falls Dam. September 5, 1914. 1 page.

18 Tetra Tech EM Inc. 2004. Final Analytical R esults Report for Expanded Site Inspection, Anaconda Minerals Company, Great Falls Refinery, Black Eagle, Cascade County, Montana. June 2004. 208

pages.

19 Final Report: Chemical Concentrations in Sedi ment, Surface Water, and Fish Tissue from the Great Falls Historical Metals Smelter/Refinery Site – Winter 2004. 2005. Parametrix. 53 pages

20 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Memorandum from Dale J. Hoff, Ph.D., Regional Ecotoxicologist to Jim Harris, Site Assessment Mana ger, Great Falls Smelter Site, Great Falls, Mt. Subject: Review of Draft Report: Chemical Con centrations in Sediment, Surface Water, and Fish

Tissue from the Great Falls Historical Metals Sme lter/Refinery Site-Winter 2004. Parametrix, May 2005. June 8, 2005. 2 pages.

21 URS Operating Services, Inc. 2007. Analyti cal Results Report for CERCLA Site Assessment. Anaconda Minerals Co, Great Falls Refinery, Great Fa lls, Montana. Pages: cover page and i-iv, 1-33. Appendix C-Project Photolog, 59 pages, A ppendix D-Property Sketch Forms, 64 pages.

22 URS Operating Services. 2010. Memora ndum and Figure. Subject: Combined Area of Arsenic and Cadmium Contamination Determined by Analytical Data and Geographical Information System (GIS) Spatial Data. Figure B. January 25, 2010. 2 pages.

23 URS Operating Service, Inc. 2009c. Analy tical Results Report for CERCLA Site Assessment Expanded Site Investigation of the Missouri River Sediments. Anaconda Minerals Co, Great Falls Refinery, Great Falls, Cascade County, Montana. August 31, 2009. 205 pages.

24 URS Operating Services, Inc. 2009d. Memorandum to File from Jeremiah Ervin. September 01, 2009. Subject: Determination of Areas of contam ination by analytical data and Geographical Information System (GIS) Spatial Data with att ached GPS sample location coordinates. 12 pages.

25 URS Operating Services, Inc. 2009e. Memorandum to File from Barry Hayhurst. January 26, 2010. Subject: Calculation of square footage of comb ined arsenic and cadmium contaminated soil covered by paved streets in the unincorporated community of Black Eagle, Montana using sample data collected in August 2007 and July 2008. 1 page.

26 URS Operating Services, Inc. 2009f. Memorandum to File from Barry Hayhurst. August 04, 2009. Subject: Calculation of structure and pavement coverage of lots sampled in Black Eagle, Montana in July 2008. 3 pages.

27 Tech Law, Inc. 2008. Data Validation Reports for Anaconda Minerals Co. Great Falls Refinery. Reports nos. MH21S2, MH26P1, and MH 26N3. December 03, 2008. 110 pages.

28 U.S. Census Bureau. 2009. Cascade County, Mont ana – QuickFacts from the U.S. Census Bureau. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/30/30013.html . Accessed August 12, 2009. 1 Page.HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 11 - MTD093291599 29 Great Falls Tribune. 2002. “Mountains of Slag Dumped into Missouri” by Sonja Lee Sunday, September 22, 2002. Page 8A.

30 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrati on (NOAA). 2007. Email from Edward Kurdy of NOAA to Barry Hayhurst of URS Operating Services with attachments of monthly wind roses from great falls international airport. 13 pages.

31 Amelia H. Kleinschmidt. 1919. Letter to Amal gamated Copper Company. February 4, 1919. 1

page.

32 Goodale, C. W. 1904. Letter to A. K. Wheeler , Superintendent Great Falls, Montana from C. W. Goodale, Assistant Manager. Re: Samples of Grass and Topsoil collected April 11, 1904. May 7, 1904. 2 pages.

33 Anaconda Copper Mining Company, Great Falls Re duction Department. 1951. Memorandum to file from Assistant Superintendent, Zinc. Ro asters. November 16, 1951. 1 page.

34 Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks. 2009. Fax from Bill Gardner of Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife & Parks to Barry Ha yhurst, URS Operating Services, Inc., regarding Black Eagle Fisheries on the Missouri River. 2 pages.

35 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1999. National Wetlands Inventory Maps of the 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Quadrangles, Northwest Great Falls, Montana and Northeast Great Falls, Montana. 2 sheets. Annotated Excerpt of Northwest Great Falls Montana Sheet. 1 page.

36 URS Operating Services. 2008b. Three field L ogbooks for the Anaconda Minerals Co, Great Falls Refinery ESI. Logbook No. 1, 8 pages; Logbook No. 2, 19 pages; Logbook No. 3, 25 pages.

37 Plat Map for Black Eagle, Montana. 2004. http://nris.mt.gov/nsdi/orthophotos.

38 Reference Reserved.

39 Reference Reserved.

40 Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks. 2009. Giant Springs State Park. Website http://fwp.mt.gov/lands/site_282690.aspx . Accessed August 16, 2009. 4 pages.

41 River’s Edge Trail Map. 2009. Rivers Edge Tr ail Recreational Trails Map. 1 sheet. Website http://www.thetrail.org/TrailMaps/RET-09URBAN-HiRes.pdf . Accessed Sept 14, 2009.

42 URS Operating Services, Inc. 2010. Figure E, AMC Smelter and Refinery Area map. 1 page.

43 EPA. 1996. Using Qualified Data to Document an Observed Release and Observed Contamination. 18 pages.

44 URS Operating Services, Inc. 2009g. Memorandum to File from Barry Hayhurst. Subject: Fishing on the Missouri River between Black Eagle and Rainbow Dams. September 25, 2009. 1 page.

45 URS Operating Services, Inc. 2009h. Memorandum to File from Barry Hayhurst. Subject: Fishing on the Missouri River Between Black Eagle and Ra inbow Dams and the consumption of the fish caught in this section of the Missouri River. October 01, 2009. 1 page.HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 12 - MTD093291599 46 URS Operating Services, Inc. 2009i. Memorandum to File from Barry Hayhurst. Subject: Consumption of fish caught from the Miss ouri River. October 14, 2009. 1 page.

47 Boston Montana Consolidated Copper and Silver Mining Company, Great Falls, Montana. 1905. Letter from K. E. Wheeler, Superint endent to C. W. Goodall, Manager with attached assay certificate for soil samples collected March 29, 1905. 2 pages.

48 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1995. Establishing Background Levels. Directive 9286.7- 19FS. September 1995. 7 pages.

49 URS Operating Services, Inc. 2010. Figure A: 2007 /2008 Background Sample Locations Map. January 2010. 1 sheet.

50 URS Operating Services, Inc. 2009k. Figure C: Site Details and Samp le Location Map with 15-

Mile Downstream TDL. 1 sheet.

51 TLI Solutions. 2007. Data Validation Repor ts for 2007 soil data: SDG MH1H13, MH1H19, MH1H34, AND MH1H43. December 07, 2007. 160 pages.

52 URS Operating Services. 2007. Field Logbook of Barry Hayhurst, July 15-August 13, 2007. 38

pages.

53 URS Operating Services, Inc. 2009l. Memorandum to File. Bryan Williams, URS Op. Services. Source 2 Information. December 01, 2009. 1 page.

54 URS Operating Services, Inc. 2009m. Memorandum to File. Bryan Williams, URS Op. Services. Sample comparability. December 01, 2009. 1 page.

55 Cascade County Public Works Department. 2009. Email from Jim Young, P.E.-Senior Civil Engineer with attachment showing outfalls from Bl ack Eagle to the Missouri River. December 18, 2009. 19 pages.

56 History of Great Falls, Montana. 2009. http://100megsfree3.com/mickme/1800.html . December 28, 2009. 4 pages.

57 Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcem ent. Annual Evaluation Summary Report for the Mine Waste Cleanup Bureau’s Abandoned Mine Lands Program for the State of Montana. Evaluation Year 2004 (July 1, 2003-June 30, 2004). 17 pages.

58 ARCO Environmental Remediation, L.L.C. and Cas cade Count and the City of Great Falls, Montana. 2000. Montana Voluntary Cleanup and Redevel opment Act (VCRA) Application, Former Great Falls Refinery Site, Great Falls Montana. J une 26, 2000. 350 pages plus 1 map, Appendix I.

59 Cascade County Public Works Department. 2010. Email from Jim Young, P.E.-Senior Civil Engineer to Barry Hayhurst, URS Corp. with a ttachment showing boundaries of outfalls from Black Eagle to the Missouri River. January 4, 2010. 2 pages.

60 A4 Scientific, Inc. 2007a. CLP data package for Sample Delivery Group (SDG) SDG MH1H19. 622

pages.

61 A4 Scientific, Inc. 2007b. CLP data packag es for Sample Delivery Group (SDG) MH1H34. 590

pages.HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 13 - MTD093291599 62 A4 Scientific, Inc. 2007c. CLP data packag es for Sample Delivery Group (SDG) MH1H43. 591

pages.

63 Chemtech Consulting Group. 2008a. CLP Data Package for Sample Delivery Group (SDG) MH26N3. 296 pages.

64 Chemtech Consulting Group. 2008b. CLP Data Package for Sample Delivery Group (SDG) MH26P1. 190 pages.

65 Montana Refining Company. January 28, 2010. Website: http://montanarefining.com . 1 page.

66 U.S. Energy Information Administration. January 28, 2010. Ranking of U.S. Refineries. Website: http://www.eia.doe.gov/neic/rankings/refineries.htm . 5 pages. 67 Compuchem Laboratories. 2010. Email from Cath y Dover, Supervisor of Project Management, Compuchem to Kim Ohlson, URS Corp. Subject: Metals WO#0907118 Revised Form 10. February 3, 2010. 3 pages.

68 URS Operating Services, Inc. 2011. Surface Water Quality Exceedances. 1 map.HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 14 - MTD093291599 SITE HISTORY and DESCRIPTION

The ACM Smelter and Refinery site is located in Black Eagle, Montana, near the city of Great Falls (Ref. 3; Ref. 4). As will be described below and in the fo llowing pages, the site consists of sources and releases related from the Anaconda Copper Mining Company (A CM) smelter and refining operations (also known as the Anaconda Minerals Co. (AMC), Great Falls Refine ry facility). Releases from these operations affect the residential community of Black Eagle and the fisher ies and sensitive environments associated with the

Missouri River as will be described in this HRS documentation record.

Great Falls, Montana was founded by Minneapolis entrep reneur, Paris Gibson, in 1883 with the vision of a metropolis based upon the waterpower of the Missouri Ri ver (Ref. 6, p. 40). In 1889 the Boston and Montana Consolidated Copper and Silver Mining Company (Bos ton & Montana), headquartered in nearby Butte, Montana, decided to build a new smelter on the north bank of the Missouri River at Great Falls, Montana. The new smelter would use nearby coal deposits for sm elting and the hydro power of the Missouri River to mechanically treat ore, to sluice away byproducts, and to generate electricity for electrolytic refining. The new Boston & Montana Refinery opened in 1893 and soon em ployed 1,200 men (Ref. 6, p. 41). Most of the ore processed at the new smelter came from the mines in Butte, Montana (Ref. 7, p. 5A; Ref. 6 p. 41).

The consolidation of the five major Montana coppe r operations under the Anaconda Copper Mining Company in 1910 resulted in the Great Falls operation specializ ing in the refining process and as a result in 1916 new electrolytic copper and zinc operations were built at th e Anaconda Minerals Co, Great Falls Refinery facility (Ref. 9, p. 20). A new mill was constructed on the site in 1918 to produce copper wire, rod, and cable (Ref. 7, p. 5A). By mid-century the ACM facility had taken on the appearance that is depicted in the annotated photograph published in the Great Falls Tribune’s story “The Rise and Fall of the world’s tallest smokestack” (Ref. 8, p. 6A).

The smoke stack at the original 1893 plant was 186 feet tall (Ref. 8, p. 6A). The Big Stack was constructed in 1908 to a length of 506 feet and a total height of 751 feet above the smelter’s blast furnace (Ref. 8 p. 7A). The Big Stack went into service on June 12, 1909 a nd continued belching smoke until August 06, 1972 (Ref. 9, p. 15). The Big Stack was designed to eject a volume of 1,575,000 cubic feet of air per minute at a velocity of 450 feet per minute, a sufficient volume and rate to entrain and remove from the smelter all the gases and dust generated during the smelting process (Ref. 9, p. 20).

The wind in the Great Falls Montana area primarily blows from the southwest to the east-northeast, particularly in the months of October through March. Wind data collected at the Great Falls International Airport, approximately 5 miles southwest of the community of Black Eagle show that during March, April, and May the winds can blow from the northwest or northeast more than twenty percent of the time and that in the summer months of June, July, and August wind dir ection over Black Eagle is from the northeast or east more than 20 percent of the time (Ref. 30, pp. 2-13). A historic south facing aerial photo published by the

Great Falls Tribune in 2002 shows smoke from the 506 foot tall stack wafting westward across the community of Black Eagle with the city of Great Falls shown in the backgr ound beyond the Missouri River (Ref. 29, p. 8A). Area ranchers began complaining a bout contamination from the smelter and refinery stack falling on their property and adversely affecting their livelihood in the early 1900s (Ref. 31). Chemical assays of flue dust and top soil near the stack perfo rmed by Boston & Montana chemists in 1904 and 1905 concluded that over 40 pounds of arsenic trioxide (As 2 0 3 ) had been deposited per acre by March of 1904 at a distance 6.24 miles from the stack (Ref. 32, p. 2). Additional sampling at new locations performed in 1905 concluded that almost 14 pounds of arsenic trioxide (As 2 0 3 ) had been deposited at 2.5 miles from the stack (Ref. 47, p. 2). An internal Anaconda Coppe r Mining Company Memorandum from 1951 stated that approximately 15.04 pounds of arsenic passed out of the stack every 24 hours (Ref. 33, p. 1). For these reasons, aerial deposition of contaminants emanati ng from the smelter smoke stacks between 1893 and 1972 is the most likely mechanism of contaminant transport to the residential soils in the community of Black Eagle.HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 15 - MTD093291599 The Boston and Montana smelter routinely dumped large quantities of granulated slag and tailings into the Missouri River (Ref. 6, p. 42; Ref. 15, p. 1). In 1907, the Boston and Montana Consolidated Copper and Silver Mining Company estimated that the facility c ould receive up to 4800 tons a day of ore and changing the disposal of slag to railcar woul d significantly increase rail traffic (Ref. 14, p. 1). The Montana Department of Environmental Quality (Montana DEQ) estimates that between 27,500,000 and 31,000,000 cubic yards of waste were dumped into the Missouri River between 1893 and 1915 until onsite containment was instituted in 1915. Montana DEQ also reports that it is possible that dumping of waste into the Missouri River continued at a reduced rate after 1915 until the facility closed in the 1970s (Ref. 16, p. 1). So much smelter waste was dumped into the Missouri River between 1893 and 1915 that the management and legal department of the Boston and Montana Company were concerned that the Federal Government would intervene and enjoin the deposition of tailings into the Missouri River by virtue of the constitutional provisions requiring the federal government to maintain navigable streams (Ref. 15, pp. 1 and 2). In 1884 Judge Lorenzo Sawyer of the United States Circuit Court in San Francisco had grante d a perpetual injunction against hydraulic mining in California’s American River on these very grounds (Ref. 6, p. 38).

Numerous complaints were filed by property owners a nd communities along the Missouri River downstream of the ACM Smelter and Refinery of water quality issues and slag and smelter waste clogging the Missouri River (Ref. 6, p. 42; Ref. 29, p. 8A). These complaints increased after the 1908 flood of the Missouri River inundated the community of Fort Benton, 40 miles dow nstream of the Boston and Montana Smelter with smelter waste (Ref. 6, p. 38; Ref. 29, p. 8A). A company analysis of slime (very fine grained slag and tailings, which tended to float in the Missouri River) taken above Rainbow Falls Dam in 1914 indicated that the slime contained between .55 and 1.1 percent copper (Ref. 17, p. 1). The Boston and Montana Company sought to buy off disgruntled prope rty owners and placate communities by providing alternate domestic water sources (Ref. 6, pp. 49-51).

The Montana DEQ collected the first samples of Missour i River sediment for environmental analysis in May of 2002. These samples were collected from the Fort Benton area, approximately 30 miles downstream from the ACM Smelter and Refinery. The Montana DEQ concl uded that the five samples that had been collected contained anomalously high levels of antimony, ar senic, copper, lead, zinc, and other metals and recommended that additional samples be taken from the sm elter site in Black Eagle down to Judith Landing (State Highway 287) (Ref. 16, p. 2).

The EPA conducted an Expande d Site Inspection of the ACM Smelter and Refinery facility in April 2003 that included source samples and nine sediment samples from the Missouri River (Ref. 18, p. 8). Elevated concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, manganese, mercury, silver and zinc were detected in most of the samples as compared to background (Ref. 18, pp. 23-24).

The current owner, Atlantic Richfield Company, c onducted a limited study of sediment, surface water and fish tissue from the Missouri River near the facility in November, 2004 (Ref. 19, p.7). Their conclusions of the investigation were that concentrations of meta ls adjacent to and downstream of the ACM Smelter and Refinery facility were comparable to or even less than background concentrations of the metals (Ref. 19, p. 8). A review of the report by the EPA’s Regional Ecologi cal toxicologist noted that at three sample locations ecotoxicological benchmarks were exceeded in soil sampl es, and it is likely that higher concentrations of metals in all samples could have been obtained by ta king samples on the north side of the Missouri River, which is the same side as the facility rather than acr oss the River on the south bank of the Missouri River (Ref. 20, pp.1, 2).

The EPA conducted a Site Assessment of the residential so il in Great Falls, Montana south of the site of the former refinery and smelter and in the community of Black Eagle, Montana in 2007. Between the dates of August 8 and 15, 2007, samples were collected from sixty-three residential properties. The 2007 investigation identified a large area of elevated c oncentrations of arsenic, cadmium, and lead in theHRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 16 - MTD093291599 community Black Eagle and one property in Great Falls contained an elevated concentration (Ref. 21, p.18; Ref. 22, pp. 1-2).

The EPA conducted an Expanded Site In spection of the residential soils in the community of Black Eagle, Montana in 2008 utilizing the same sample collection a nd analytical procedures as the 2007 investigation (Ref. 21, pp. 11-12; Ref. 5, p. 11). Between the da tes of July 8 and 16, 2008 samples were collected from fifty-nine residential properties (Ref. 5, p. 1). The 2008 investigation also identified a large area of elevated

arsenic and lead concentrations in residential so il as compared to background in an area centered on the central and southwestern area of the community of Black Eagle (Ref. 5, p. 13; Ref. 22 pp. 1-2).

The EPA conducted an Expanded Site Inspection of th e sediments in the Missouri River adjacent to and downstream of the ACM Smelter and Refinery property in July 2009. On July 14, eight sediment samples were collected from along the north side of the Missouri River channel between the 11 th Street Bridge and Rainbow Dam (Ref. 23, pp. 15 and 21). This investiga tion identified a stream segment of 2.39 miles with concentrations of copper, lead, and silver (Ref. 23, p. 21). This segment of the Missouri River includes widely used fishing areas (Ref. 34, p. 2). Fishing was observed by the sampling team during the 2009 Expanded Site Inspection (Ref. 23, p. 14, 23, 28, and 33). The Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks estimates that a population of 1,292 rainbow trout a nd 302 brown trout are found in the 1.5 mile stretch between Black Eagle Dam and Giant Springs State hatc hery based on an electroshock survey done before stocking in the summer of 2000 (Ref. 34, p. 1). The fish that are caught along this stretch of the river are eaten by the anglers and their families (Ref. 44; Ref. 45; and Ref. 46).HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 17 - MTD093291599 2.2.1 SOURCE IDENTIFICATION

Name of the Source : Black Eagle Residential Soil

Number of Source : 1

Source Type : contaminated soil

Description and Location of the source :

Residential soil contamination in the unincorporated residential community of Black Eagle located on the

north bank of the Missouri River across from Great Fa lls, Montana, was first documented by the EPA’s 2003 Expanded Site Inspection when elevated concentrations of metals, including arsenic, cadmium, and lead were found in one or more samples (Ref. 4, map 1; Ref. 18, pp. 28-30).

The 2007 EPA CERCLA Site Assessment sampled residences on both the north and south sides of the Missouri River adjacent to the Anaconda Minerals Co, Great Falls Refinery (Ref. 21, p. 11). Of the eleven residences sampled in Great Falls on the south side of the Missouri River in August of 2007 only one residence had an elevated concentration of arsenic (Ref . 21, p. 13). The results of the 2007 investigation of the residential soil in the community of Black Eagl e identified an area of arsenic, cadmium, and lead concentrations greater than three times background cente red on eastern and central Black Eagle (Ref. 21, p. 13-14, 18).

The 2008 EPA CERCLA Expanded Site Investigation was focused in the unincorporated community of Black Eagle, Montana. The residential soil at fifty nine r esidential properties in Black Eagle was sampled in July 2008 to a depth of one foot (Ref. 5, p. 1). Concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, and lead elevated three times background were detected in the residential soil in Bl ack Eagle centered on the central and southwestern area of Black Eagle (Ref. 5, p. 13; Ref. 22, pp. 1-2).

The regional setting of the community of Black Eagle, the Missouri River, Great Falls, and the ACM Smelter and Refinery are shown in Figure E (Ref. 42, 1 page). For this document the combined area of arsenic and cadmium contamination (not corrected for covered soil) greater than three times background and above a

health based benchmark was used to define the source. Samples from the 0-2 inch horizon were compared to background samples from the 0-2 inch horizon, and samples from the 6-12 inch horizon were compared to the background samples from the 6-12 inch horizon. There ar e eight sample locations with arsenic or cadmium concentrations greater than times background and are above a health based benchmark. There are an additional forty-five locations where cadmium and/or lead concentrations are greater than three times background (see Section 2.2.1.2 of this HRS documentation record).

The soil background samples used to establish observed contamination are presented in the table below. Two locations were sampled in 2007 from the 0-2 inch a nd 6-12 inch horizon and two locations were sampled from the 0-2 inch horizon in 2008 (Ref. 5, p. 10; Ref. 21, p. 11; Ref. 36, book 2, p. 3 & book 3, pp. 17-18; Ref. 52, pp. 15-16, 28; Ref. 49, 1 page). The highest background sample result for each of the horizons was selected as the background sample for that horizon. A ll background values selected were obtained from 2007 background samples with four of the six background values derived from the background samples collected from North Middle School (R08ST2601F102 and R08ST 2601F112), which was also the location of the 2004 soil background sample (Ref. 18, p. 27). All samples were collected as grab samples following the guidelines of the UOS TSOPs using stainless steel spoons, bowls, a nd hand augers to collect the soil into 12X12 inch seal top poly bags. The 0-2 inch horizon was collected di rectly into the plastic zip lock bag using a stainless steel spoon, and the 6-12 inch horizon was collected us ing a hand auger into a stainless steel bowl where the soil was lightly homogenized by stirring before a sampl e was collected into 12X12 inch seal top poly bags (Ref. 5, p. 11; Ref. 21, pp. 11-12). All of the background samples were collected from the area north of the Missouri River, west of the site, in soils develope d on the Kootenai Formation which also underlies theHRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 18 - MTD093291599 community of Black Eagle (Ref. 5, p. 5; Ref. 10. 1 sheet; Ref. 21, p. 4). The soil was moist, fine-grained well sorted silty sand at the locations (Ref. 52, pp. 15-16 & 28). All soil samples collected were analyzed in the field using an x-ray fluorescence (XRF) unit (Ref. 5, p. 12; Ref. 21, p. 12). All samples for fixed laboratory analyses were analyzed through the EPA’s Contract Labor atory Program (CLP), Routine Analytical Services (RAS). The samples collected in 2007 were analyzed by A4 Scientific, Inc. of The Woodlands, Texas by EPA CLP method ILM05.4 (Ref. 60, p. 1; Ref. 61, p. 1; Ref. 62, p. 1). The samples collected in 2008 were analyzed by Chemtech Consulting Group, Mountainside, New Jersey by EPA CLP method ILM05.4 (Ref. 63. p. 1; Ref. 64, p. 1).HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 19 - MTD093291599

*ACM Smelter and Refinery – Background Samples 0-2 inch horizon collected in 2007 and 2008 ( mg/kg) Analyte CRDL/ MDL(2007/2008) SCDM

Benchmark

CRSC/

RDSC Jaycee Park

R04ST2400F102

CLP - MHIH26 Sampled

8/10/2007 North Middle

School

R08ST2601F102

CLP - MH1H34 Sampled

8/8/2007 R25AV0724FY02

CLP - MH26P6 Sampled

7/11/2008 R25AV0737SY02

CLP - MH26P7 Sampled

7/11/2008

Arsenic 1/(0.49/0.37) 0.43 13.3 (10.4 J) 18.1 6.3 16.1

Cadmium 0.5/(0.20/0.040) 39 1.2 J+ 0.82 J+ 0.53 (0.34 J) 0.48

Lead 1/(0.49/0.25)

- 30.1 (17.5 J) 25.2 25.3 20.6

Reference Ref. 64, p. 51; Ref. 60, p. 64; Ref. 61, p. 64; Ref. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14,

BII-20 Ref. 21, p. 29; Ref. 51, pp. 117, 120, 124, 138; Ref. 52. p. 28; Ref. 60, pp. 1, 3, 6, 8, 18, 78, 363-365, 594, 599, 604; Ref. 21, p. 29; Ref. 51, pp. 2, 5, 9, 16; Ref. 52, pp. 15-16; Ref. 61, pp. 1, 3, 8, 9, 13, 219-221, 560, 566, 570, Ref. 5, pp. 28- 31, Appendix C, p. 56. Ref. 24, p.
3, Ref. 27, pp. 2,
3B, 3C, 3F, 3G, 3H, 9; Ref. 36, book 2, p. 3 & book 3, pp. 17- 18; Ref. 64. pp. 1, 4, 7, 9, 15, 79. Ref. 5, p. 28, & Appendix C, p. 56. Ref. 24, p. 3. Ref. 27, pp. 2, 3B, 3C, 3G, 3H, 10; Ref. 36, Book 2, p. 3; Ref 64, pp. 1, 4, 7, 9, 16, 80.

* Sample IDs ending in 02 represent samples collected from 0-2 inches (Ref. 5, p. 10; Ref. 21, p. 11).

Bold Indicates background value sel ected for this document / mg/kg CRSC Cancer Risk Screening Concentration RDSC Reference Dose Screening Concentration J The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity and is the approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample. J+ The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity, but the result may be biased high. ( ) Validated value prior to adjustment as per EPA Fact Sheet “Using Qualified Data to Document an Observed Release and Observed Contamination” (Ref. 43, 18 pages). mg/kg milligrams per kilogram

**ACM Smelter and Refinery – Background Samples 6-12 inch horizon collected in 2007 ( mg/kg) Analyte CRDL/MDL SCDM

Benchmark

CRSC/RDSC Jaycee Park

R04ST2400F112

CLP - MHIH27 Sampled

8/10/2007 North Middle

School

R08ST2601F112

CLP - MH1H35 Sampled 8/8/2007 6-12 inch sample

not collected in

2008 6-12 inch sample

not collected in

2008

Arsenic 1/0.49 0.43 17.2 (13.3 J) 23.1

- - Cadmium 0.5/0.20 39 0.43 J+ 0.67 J+

- - Lead 1/0.49

- 10.6 (12.9 J) 18.6

- - Reference Ref. 60, p. 64; Ref. 61, p. 64; Ref. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14,

BII-20 Ref. 21, pp. 29-32; Ref. 51,

pp. 117, 120, 124, 139; Ref.

52. p. 28; Ref. 60, pp. 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 19, 117, 120, 124, 139, 366-368. Ref. 21, pp.29- 32; Ref. 51, pp. 2, 5, 9, 17; Ref. 52, pp. 15-16; Ref. 61, pp. 1, 3, 5, 8, 9, 14,

222-224 - -

** Sample IDs ending in 12 represent samples collected from 6-12 inches (Ref. 5, p. 10; Ref. 21, p. 11).

Bold Indicates background value sel ected for this document / mg/kgHRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 20 - MTD093291599 CRSC Cancer Risk Screening Concentration RDSC Reference Dose Screening Concentration J The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity and is the approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample. J+ The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity, but the result may be biased high. ( ) Validated value prior to adjustment as per EPA Fact Sheet “Using Qualified Data to Document an Observed Release and Observed Contamination” (Ref. 43, 18 pages). mg/kg milligrams per kilogramHRS Documentation RecordACM Smelter and RefineryMarch 2011- 21 -MTD0932915992.2.1.2 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES ASSOCIATED WITH THE SOURCEThe following table lists all detections of arsenic, cadmium, and/or lead from the 2007 and 2008 EPA investigations of the residential soils in Black Eagle, Montanawhich meet the HRS definition of greater than three times background (Ref. 1, Table 2-3, p. 51589).Sample IDSampleDateArsenic(As)(mg/kg)Cadmium(Cd)(mg/kg)Lead(Pb)(mg/kg)CRDL/MDL/SCDM(mg/kg)ReferencesR11ST0111FY02MH26N307/11/200873.23261As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5. Appendix C, p. 54. AppendixD, p. 1; Ref. 24, p. 1; Ref. 36, book 1,p. 5; Ref. 27, pp. 24, 27, 31, 32, 39;Ref. 63, pp. 1, 4, 7, 7A, 13. 62, 283.R12ST0106FY12MH26N407/11/200830.62.798.7As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5. Appendix C, p. 53. AppendixD, p.5; Ref. 24, p. 1; Ref. 27, pp. 24,27, 31, 32, 40; Ref. 36, book 1, p. 4;Ref. 63, pp. 1, 4, 7, 7A, 14, 62, 283.R12ST0121FY112MH26N507/11/200821513706As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 50-51.Appendix D, p.8; Ref. 24, p. 1; Ref.27, pp. 24, 27, 31, 41; Ref. 36, book3, p. 17; Ref. 63, p. 1, 4, 7, 7A, 15,62, 283.R13ST0112BY02MH26N607/10/200847.344.9562As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 45-47.Appendix D, p.9; Ref. 24, p. 1; Ref.27, pp. 24, 27, 31, 42; Ref. 36, book3, p. 12; Ref. 63, pp. 1, 4, 7, 7A, 16,62, 283.R13ST0117FY02MH26N707/11/200821.469.1439As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.50.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 7-8. AppendixD, p.10; Ref. 24, p. 1; ref. 27, pp. 24,27, 31, 32, 43; Ref. 36, book 1, p. 6-HRS Documentation RecordACM Smelter and RefineryMarch 2011- 22 -MTD093291599Sample IDSampleDateArsenic(As)(mg/kg)Cadmium(Cd)(mg/kg)Lead(Pb)(mg/kg)CRDL/MDL/SCDM(mg/kg)References7; Ref. 63, pp. 1, 4, 7, 7A, 17, 62,143, 283.R13ST0121F112MH1H3808/11/2007(66.8 J)38.4(2.5 J+)1.8(754 J)523.6As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 30, Appendix C, p. 4,Appendix D, p.2; Ref. 51, pp. 2, 5, 8,9, 10, 12, 20; Ref. 61, pp. 1, 3, 5, 8,9, 17, 64, 288-290.R13ST0123FY02MH26N907/12/200816.59.2432As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 7. AppendixD, p.14; Ref. 24, p. 1; Ref 27, 24, 27,31, 32, 45; Ref. 36, book 2, p. 5; Ref.63, pp. 1, 4, 7, 7A, 19, 62, 148, 283R13ST0127FY12MH26P007/12/200836.37.8340As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 8. AppendixD, p.15; Ref. 24, p. 1; Ref. 27, 24, 27,31, 32, 46; Ref. 36, book 2, p. 8; Ref.63, pp. 1, 4, 7, 7A, 20, 62, 149, 283.R14ST0122F102MH1H3908/11/2007(24.2 J)13.9111(607 J)421.5As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 29, Appendix C, p. 34,Appendix D, p. 3; Ref. 51, pp. 2, 5, 8,10, 12, 21; Ref. 52, p 34; Ref. 61, pp.1, 3, 5, 8, 9, 18, 291-293, 495-497R16ST0121BY12MH26P107/14/200867.814.5333As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.50.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 25. AppendixD, p.17; Ref. 24, p. 3; Ref. 27, pp. 2,3B, 3G, 3H, 4; Ref. 36, book 2, p. 14;Ref. 61, pp. 1, 4, 7, 9, 10, 64, 74,182, 184.R15ST0215B102MH1H4008/08/2007(18 J)10.311.6(553 J)384.0As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 29, Appendix C, p. 5,Appendix D, p. 4; Ref. 51, pp. 2, 5,HRS Documentation RecordACM Smelter and RefineryMarch 2011- 23 -MTD093291599Sample IDSampleDateArsenic(As)(mg/kg)Cadmium(Cd)(mg/kg)Lead(Pb)(mg/kg)CRDL/MDL/SCDM(mg/kg)References10, 12, 22; Ref. 61, pp. 1, 3, 5, 8, 9,19, 64, 294-296R15ST0307F112MH1H4108/08/2007(39.8 J)22.9(2.2 J +)1.6(789 J)547.9As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 30, Appendix C, p. 5,Appendix D, p. 5; Ref. 51, pp. 2, 5, 8,9, 10, 12, 23; Ref. 61, pp. 1, 3, 5, 8,9, 20, 64, 297-299, 381-383,R16ST0128F112MH1H4308/11/2007(34.5 J)19.8(2.3 J+)1.6163As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 30, Appendix C, p. 6,Appendix D, p. 7; Ref. 51, pp. 46, 49,52, 53, 54, 56, 60; Ref. 62, 1, 3, 8, 9,13, 64, 112-114.R17ST0122F112MH1H4408/11/2007(60.1 J)34.5(27 J)19.2967As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 30, Appendix C, p. 7,Appendix D, p. 8; Ref. 51, pp. 46, 49,54, 56, 61; Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3, 8, 9, 14,64, 115-117, 432-434.R17ST0125F112MH1H4508/12/2007(43.5 J)25(6.9 J)4.9162As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 30, Appendix C, p. 7,Appendix D, p. 9; Ref. 51, pp. 46, 49,54, 56, 62; Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3, 8, 9, 15,64, 118-120.R20ST0118BY12MH26P307/10/200822.89.4319As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 47. AppendixD, p.22; Ref. 24, p. 2; Ref. 27, pp. 2,3B, 3F, 3G, 3H, 6; Ref. 36, book 3, p.14; Ref. 64, pp. 1, 4, 7, 9, 12, 51, 76,180, 182R21ST0328FY12MH26P407/15/200872.42.586.2As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 37. AppendixD, p.25; Ref. 24, p. 2; Ref. 27, 2, 3B,HRS Documentation RecordACM Smelter and RefineryMarch 2011- 24 -MTD093291599Sample IDSampleDateArsenic(As)(mg/kg)Cadmium(Cd)(mg/kg)Lead(Pb)(mg/kg)CRDL/MDL/SCDM(mg/kg)References3C, 3F, 3G, 3H, 7; Ref. 36, book 2, p.18; Ref. 64, pp. 1, 4, 7, 9,13, 51, 77,180, 182.R21ST0520FY12MH26P507/15/200847.52.690.1As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 35. AppendixD, p.30; Ref. 24, p. 2; Ref. 27, pp. 2,3B, 3C, 3F, 3G, 3H, 8; Ref. 36, book2, p. 19; Ref. 64, p. 1, 4, 7, 9, 14, 51,78, 92.R21ST0625F112MH1H4708/10/200743.62.7124As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 30, Appendix C, p. 37,Appendix D, p. 13; Ref. 51, pp. 118,120, 125, 126, 147; Ref 52, p. 26;Ref. 60, pp. 1, 3, 6, 10, 27, 64, 456-458.R21ST0641S112MH1H4808/10/200738.42.8199As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 30, Appendix C, p. 9,Appendix D, p. 14; Ref. 51, pp. 118,120, 125, 126, 148; Ref. 60, pp. 1, 3,6, 10, 28, 64, 459-461.R22ST0114B112MH1H5008/09/200784.427.3397As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 31 , Appendix C, p. 10,Appendix D, p. 15; Ref. 51, pp. 118,120, 125, 150; Ref. 60, pp. 2, 3, 6,10, 30, 64, 465-467.R22ST0118F102MH1H5208/09/2007(22.4 J)12.925.8(519 J)399.2As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 29, Appendix C, p.11,Appendix D, p. 16; Ref. 51, pp. 2, 5,8, 10, 12, 26; Ref. 61, pp. 1, 3, 5, 8,10, 23, 64, 315-317, 390-395R22ST0613B11208/10/2007(39.8 J)7.8(272 J)As = 1/0.49/0.43Ref. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;HRS Documentation RecordACM Smelter and RefineryMarch 2011- 25 -MTD093291599Sample IDSampleDateArsenic(As)(mg/kg)Cadmium(Cd)(mg/kg)Lead(Pb)(mg/kg)CRDL/MDL/SCDM(mg/kg)ReferencesMH1H5422.9209.2Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 21, p. 31, Appendix C, p. 38,Appendix D, p. 20; Ref. 51, pp. 2, 5,8, 10, 12, 28; Ref. 52, p. 29; Ref. 61,pp. 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 26, 64, 321-323,420-422R22ST0633B112MH1H5508/10/2007(53.1 J)33.22.9(290 J)223.1As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 31, Appendix C, p. 16,Appendix D, p. 22; Ref. 51, pp. 2, 5,8, 10, 12, 29; Ref. 61, pp.1, 3, 5, 8,11, 26, 64, 324-326, 423-425R22ST0641B112MH217408/09/2007(88.8 J)55.53.6(223 J)171.5As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 31, Appendix C, p. 17,Appendix D, p. 23; Ref. 51, pp. 3, 5,8, 10, 12, 30; Ref. 61, pp. 1, 3, 5, 8,11, 27, 64, 327-329, 426-428RCHAV1820BY12MH26Q007/13/200850.92.789.4As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, pp. 29, 65, Appendix C, pp.23-24, Appendix D, p. 34, Ref. 27,pp. 2, 3B, 3C, 3F, 3G, 3H, 13; Ref.64, pp. 1, 4, 7, 9, 19, 51, 85, 182,185, 189.RCOAV1508S112MH217608/10/2007(53.1 J)33.2(3 J+)2.1179As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 31, Appendix C, p.18,Appendix D, p. 26; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 52, 53, 54, 56, 63; Ref. 62, pp. 1,3, 8, 10, 16, 64, 121-123, 435-437RCOAV1702BY12MH26Q207/12/200829.31.676.7As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 11. AppendixD, p.37; Ref. 24, p. 4; Ref. 27, pp. 2,3B, 3C, 3F, 3G, 3H, 15; Ref. 36,book 3, p. 5; Ref. 64, p. 1, 4, 7, 8, 21,HRS Documentation RecordACM Smelter and RefineryMarch 2011- 26 -MTD093291599Sample IDSampleDateArsenic(As)(mg/kg)Cadmium(Cd)(mg/kg)Lead(Pb)(mg/kg)CRDL/MDL/SCDM(mg/kg)References51, 87.RCOAV1711B102MH217708/10/2007(23.9 J)13.7(3.9 J)2.894.6As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 29, Appendix C, p. 20,Appendix D, p. 29; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 52, 54, 56, 64; Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3,8, 10, 17, 64, 124-126.RCOAV1903B112MH217908/10/2007(63.8 J)39.9(13.2 J)9.4866As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 31, Appendix C, p. 21,Appendix D, p. 31; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 52, 54, 56, 65; Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3,8, 10, 18, 64, 127-129, 438-440RCOAV1904B112MH218008/09/2007(32.9 J)18.9(5.5 J)3.9224As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 31, Appendix C, p. 43,Appendix D, p. 32; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 52, 54, 56, 66. Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3,8, 10, 19, 64, 130-132, 441-443RCOAV1906B112MH218108/09/2007(35.7 J)20.5(6.9 J)4.9216As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 32, Appendix C, p. 45,Appendix D, p. 33; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 54, 56, 67; Ref. 52, pp. 22-23;Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3, 8, 11, 20, 64, 462-464RCOAV1909BY02MH26Q307/13/200829.313.1394As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 14. AppendixD, p.39; Ref. 24, p. 3; Ref. 27, pp. 2,3B, 3F, 3G, 3H, 16; Ref. 36, book 2,p. 7; Ref. 64 pp. 1, 4, 7, 8, 22, 51, 88.RCOAV1917VG02MH218208/09/2007(6.8 J)3.9(3.8 J+)2.7119As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 21, p. 29, Appendix C, p. 22,Appendix D, p. 36; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 52, 53, 54, 56, 68; Ref. 62, pp. 1,3, 8, 11, 21, 64, 153-155, 559,HRS Documentation RecordACM Smelter and RefineryMarch 2011- 27 -MTD093291599Sample IDSampleDateArsenic(As)(mg/kg)Cadmium(Cd)(mg/kg)Lead(Pb)(mg/kg)CRDL/MDL/SCDM(mg/kg)ReferencesRCOAV1922B112MH218308/09/2007(27.6 J)15.9(1.8 J+)1.368.7As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 32, Appendix C, p. 46,Appendix D, p. 37; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 53, 69; Ref. 52, p. 20; Ref. 62, pp.1, 3, 8, 11, 22, 64, 75, 156-158, 567,568, 573.RCOAV1923F112MH218408/11/200735.33.8152As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 32, Appendix C, p. 47,Appendix D, p. 38; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 52, 53, 54, 56, 70; Ref. 52, p. 31;Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3, 8, 11, 23, 64, 177-179, 560.RCOAV1925F112MH218508/12/2007(29.3 J)16.8(2.6 J+)1.8141As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 32, Appendix C, p. 23,Appendix D, p. 39; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 52, 53, 54, 56, 71; Ref. 62, pp.1,3, 8, 11, 24, 64, 180-182.RMTAV1518FY02MH26Q507/15/200816.324.6334As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 68. AppendixD, p.41; Ref. 24, p. 3; Ref. 27, pp. 3,3B, 3F, 3G, 3H, 18; Ref. 64, pp. 1, 4,7, 8, 24, 51, 89, 104.RMTAV1708VG12MH26Q707/14/200867.31.275.8As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.50.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 43-44,Appendix D, p. 44; Ref. 24, p. 4; Ref.27, pp. 3, 3B, 3C, 3F, 3G, 3H, 20;20; Ref. 36, bk. 3, p. 11; Ref. 64, pp.1, 4, 7, 8, 26, 51, 100.RMTAV1716BY12MH26Q807/09/2008911536As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 41. AppendixD, p.46; Ref. 24, p. 3; Ref. 27, pp. 3,HRS Documentation RecordACM Smelter and RefineryMarch 2011- 28 -MTD093291599Sample IDSampleDateArsenic(As)(mg/kg)Cadmium(Cd)(mg/kg)Lead(Pb)(mg/kg)CRDL/MDL/SCDM(mg/kg)References3B, 3F, 3G, 3H, 21; Ref. 36, book 3,p. 8; Ref. 64 p. 27, 51, 186, 189.RMTAV1722FY02MH26R007/10/200830.33.8147As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 43. AppendixD, p.48; Ref. 24, p. 3; Ref. 27, pp. 3,3B, 3C, 3F, 3H, 29; Ref. 64, pp. 1, 4,7, 8, 29, 51, 103.182, 187.RMTAV1901FY12MH26R107/10/200843.42.9148As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix D, p.50; Ref. 24, p.3; Ref. 27. pp. 24, 27, 31, 32, 21; Ref.63, pp. 1, 4, 7B, 21, 51, 62, 124, 285,290, 295.RMTAV1908F112MH218608/09/2007(50.4 J)29(2.8 J+)2119As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 32, Appendix C, p. 48,Appendix D, p. 40; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 52, 53, 54, 56, 72; Ref. 52, p21;Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3, 8, 11, 25, 64, 183-185.RMTAV1912F102MH218708/09/2007(14.4 J)8.3(4.8 J)3.4331As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 29, Appendix C, p. 49,Appendix D, p. 41; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 52, 54, 56,73; Ref. 52, pp. 21-22;Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3, 5, 11, 26, 64, 186-188.RMTAV1915BY12MH26R307/13/2008750.526.7As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 20, AppendixD, p. 52; Ref. 24, p. 5; Ref. 27, pp.24, 27, 31, 32, 49; Ref. 36, bk. 2, p.11; Ref. 63, pp. 1, 4, 7B, 23, 51, 62,128.RMTAV1924B11208/10/2007(55.5 J)(3.6 J+)112As = 1/0.49/0.43Ref. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;HRS Documentation RecordACM Smelter and RefineryMarch 2011- 29 -MTD093291599Sample IDSampleDateArsenic(As)(mg/kg)Cadmium(Cd)(mg/kg)Lead(Pb)(mg/kg)CRDL/MDL/SCDM(mg/kg)ReferencesMH218934.72.6Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 21, p. 32, Appendix C, p. 50,Appendix D, p. 42; Ref. 51, pp. 47,49, 52, 53, 54, 56, 75; Ref. 52, pp.25-26; Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3, 5, 11, 28,192-194.RRBDR2720F102MH219008/11/2007(71.9 J)44.9(4.2 J)3141As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 29, Appendix C, p. 51,Appendix D, p. 43; Ref. 51, pp47, 49,52, 54, 56, 76; Ref. 62, pp.1, 3, 5, 11,29, 64, 195-197.RRVAV2118B112MH219108/10/2007(85.2 J)53.3(4.7 J)3.31,650As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 32, Appendix D, p. 44;Ref. 51, pp. 47, 49, 52, 54, 56, 77;Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3, 5, 12, 30, 64, 198-200, 465-467.RSMAV1605B112MH219208/11/2007(45.1 J)25.9(3.2 J+)2.3137As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 32, Appendix D, p. 45;Ref. 51, pp. 47, 49, 52, 53, 54, 56,78; Ref. 62, pp.1, 3, 5, 12, 31, 64,201-203, 486-488.RSMAV1624B112MH219308/11/2007(72.6 J)45.4(2.7 J+)1.9280As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 32, Appendix D, p. 46;Ref. 51, pp. 47, 49, 52, 53, 54, 56,79.Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3, 5, 12, 32, 64,213-215.RSMAV1917FY12MH26R507/14/200842.73.8167As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5. Appendix C, p. 27. AppendixD, p.56; Ref. 24, p. 5; Ref. 27, pp. 24,27, 31, 32, 51; Ref. 36, book 2, p. 15;Ref. 63, pp. 1, 4, 7, 7B, 25, 62, 135.RSMAV2021SY1207/14/200853.113.5351As = 1/0.37/0.43Ref. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;HRS DocumMentation RecordACM Smelter and Refineryarch 2011- 30 -MTD093291599Sample IDSampleDateArsenic(As)(mg/kg)Cadmium(Cd)(mg/kg)Lead(Pb)(mg/kg)CRDL/MDL/SCDM(mg/kg)ReferencesMH26R6Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 5. Appendix C, p. 67. AppendixD, p.57; Ref. 24, p. 4; Ref. 27, pp. 24,27, 31, 32, 52; Ref. 63, pp. 1, 4, 7,7B, 26, 51, 136.RSMAV2233F102MH219408/12/2007(15 J)8.66.7(131 J)100.8As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 29, Appendix C, p. 59,Appendix D, p. 49; Ref. 51, pp. 3, 5,8, 10, 12, 33; Ref. 61, pp. 1, 3, 5, 8,12, 30, 64, 354-356.J The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is the approximate concentration of the analyte in thesample.J+ The analyte was positively identified; theassociated numerical value is the approximate concentration of the analyte in thesample, but is biased high.( ) Value prior to correction as per EPA guidance 9285-7-14FS “Using Qualified Data to Document an Observed Release and Observed Contamination” (Ref. 43, 18 pages).HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 31 - MTD093291599 Source Sample Information

The source samples listed above were collected dur ing the 2007 and 2008 sampling efforts conducted by START for EPA. All samples were collected as grab samples following the guidelines of the UOS TSOPs using stainless steel spoons, bowls, and hand augers to collect the soil into 12X12 inch seal top poly bags. The 0-2 inch horizon was collected directly into the pl astic zip lock bag using a stainless steel spoon and the 6-12 inch horizon was collected using a hand auge r into a stainless steel bowl where the soil was homogenized by stirring before a sample was collected into 12X12 inch seal top poly bags (Ref. 5, p. 11; Ref. 21, pp. 11-12). All soil samples collected were analyzed in the field using a portable XRF unit (Ref. 5, p. 12; Ref. 21., p. 12). All samples that were analyzed in a fixed laboratory were analyzed through the EPA CLP, RAS for TAL total metals. Soil Samples for the 2007 inves tigation were delivered to A4 Scientific Inc. of The Woodlands, Texas on August 13, 2007 (Ref. 60, p. 3; 61, p. 3; Ref. 62, p. 3). The samples collected in 2007 were analyzed by EPA CLP method ILM05.4 (Ref. 60, p. 1; Ref. 61, p. 1; Ref. 62, p. 1). The analytical data was validated by TLI Solutions on December 7, 2007 (Ref. 51, p. 1). Soil samples for the 2008 investigation were delivered to Chemtech Consu lting Group of Mountainside, New Jersey on July 18, 2008 (Ref. 63, p. 2, Ref. 64, p. 2). The analytical data was validated by TechLaw, Inc, of Golden Colorado on December 03, 2008 (Ref. 27, p. 1). All samples collected in 2008 were analyzed by EPA CLP method ILM05.4 (Ref. 5, p. 12; Ref. 21, p. 12; Ref. 63, p. 1; Ref. 64, p. 1). Analytical results from the soil samples indicate the presence of arsenic, cadmium, and lead at concentrations greater than three times background.

2.2.1.3 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AVAILABLE TO A PATHWAY

Containment Description Containment Value References

Gas release to air: NS

-

Particulate release to air: NS

- Release to groundwater: NS

- Release via overland migration and/or flood: There is no documentation of a maintained engineered cover or and functioning and maintained run-on control system and runoff management system. Building pads, streets, sidewalks, etc. cover less than half of the area, but are not engineered containment features. Surface water runoff flows directly into the Missouri River through a series of culverts. 10 Ref. 1, p. 51588, Table 2-2, p. 51609, Table 4-2; Ref. 5, Appendices C and D; Ref. 21, Appendix C; Ref.

55.

Notes: NS = Not Scored

2.4.2 HAZARDOUS WASTE QUANTITY

2.4.2.1.1 Hazardous Constituent Quantity

Description

There are no Hazardous Constituent Quantity data available for the residential soil in Black Eagle, Montana to calculate a Hazardous Constituent Quantity value.

Sum (pounds): Not available (NA) Hazardous Constituent Quantity Assigned Value: NAHRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 32 - MTD093291599 2.4.2.1.2 Hazardous Wastestream Quantity

Description

Data are not available; it is not possible to calculate the Hazardous Wastestream Quantity.

Sum (pounds): NA Sum of Wastestream Quantity/5000 (Ref. 1, Table 2-5): NA Hazardous Wastestream Quantity Assigned Value: NA

2.4.2.1.3 Volume

Description :

The volume of contaminated soil has not been fully char acterized; it is not possible to adequately determine

the volume of this source.

Dimension of source (yd 3 ): NA Volume Assigned Value: NA

2.4.2.1.4 Area

Description

Arsenic, cadmium, and/or lead was detected above b ackground within Source 1, however the exact area of the

source is unknown.

Sum (square feet [ft 2 ]: > 0 Equation for Assigning Value (Ref. 1, Table 2-5): Area (A) / 34,000

Area Assigned Value: > 0

2.4.2.1.5 Source Hazardous Waste Quantity Value

Source No. 1 is assigned a source HWQ value of greater than zero, but unknown (Ref. 1, p. 51591, Table 2-5):

Source HWQ Value: > 0HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 33 - MTD093291599 2.2.1 SOURCE IDENTIFICATION

Name of the Source : East Ditch Dump

Number of Source : 2

Source Type : Landfill

Description and Location of the source :

East ditch dump is on a ridge above the Missouri Ri ver approximately 400 feet north of the River and approximately 3,500 feet east of the former stack (Ref. 18, Figure 2; Ref. 58, Appendix I). No continuous cap or soil cover is documented to be in place over the east ditch dump. Building/c onstruction debris, stained soils, blister copper, and slag were observed on the surface and mixed in the soil throughout the landfill area during the 2003 EPA site inspection (Ref. 18, pp. 17, 22, and 32; Ref. 53, 1 page).

2.2.2 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES ASSOCIATED WITH THE SOURCE

Evidence (total metals) Hazardous

Substance Sample No. /

CLP No. Concentration (mg/kg) Background References

Arsenic AM-SO-03 /

MX0XH0 377 23.1

Cadmium AM-SO-03 /

MX0XH0 89.8 1.2 J+

Lead AM-SO-03 /

MX0XH0 4270 30.1

Manganese AM-SO-03 /

MX0XH0 899

-

Zinc AM-SO-03 /

MX0XH0 4060

- Ref. 18, p. 94; Ref. 21, p. 29-32; Ref. 51, pp.

2, 5, 9, 16, 17, 117, 120, 124, 138; Ref. 52. pp. 15-16, 28; Ref. 60,

pp. 1, 3, 6, 8, 18, 78,

363-365, 594, 599, 604; Ref. 61, pp. 1, 3, 5, 8, 9, 13-14, 219-224

Source Sample Information

The source sample listed above was collected in Ap ril 2003 during the Expanded Site Inspection conducted by Tetra Tech EM Inc. for EPA. All samples were an alyzed through the EPA CLP, RAS for total metals. Soil samples for inorganic analysis were delivered to Sentinal Inc, of Huntsville, Alabama (Ref. 18, p. 3). The analytical data was validated by Tetra Tech, EM, Inc, of Chicago, IL on July 30, 2003 (Ref. 18, p. 56). Analytical results from the sample indicate the presence of arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, manganese, silver, and zinc in the East Ditch Dump (Ref. 18, p. 94).

Background Sample Information

The sample collected from the East Ditch Dump is compared to soil samples collected during the 2007 EPA Site Inspection. The East Ditch Dump sample was co llected from the 0 to 24 inch horizon using a macrocore (Ref. 57, 1 page). The 0-2 inch horizon background soil sample was collected directly into a plastic seal top bag using a stainless steel spoon and the 6-12 inch horiz on was collected with a hand auger into a stainless steel bowl where the soil was lightly homogenized by s tirring before a sample was collected into 12X12 inch seal top poly bags (Ref. 5, p. 11; Ref. 21, pp. 11-12). The background samples were collected from the areaHRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 34 - MTD093291599 north of the Missouri River, west of the site, in soils developed on the Kootenai Formation (Ref. 10. 1 sheet). The soil was moist, fine-grained well sorted silty sand at the locations (Ref. 52, pp. 15-16 & 28).

The highest background sample values available for the surface soil are 23.1 mg/kg arsenic, 1.2 J+ mg/kg for cadmium, and 30.1 mg/kg for lead.HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 35 - MTD093291599 *ACM Smelter and Refinery – Background Samples 0-2 inch horizon collected in 2007 and 2008 ( mg/kg)

Analyte CRDL/ MDL(2007/2008) Jaycee Park

R04ST2400F102

CLP - MHIH26 Sampled

8/10/2007 North Middle

School

R08ST2601F102

CLP - MH1H34 Sampled

8/8/2007 R25AV0724FY02

CLP - MH26P6 Sampled

7/11/2008 R25AV0737SY02

CLP - MH26P7 Sampled

7/11/2008

Arsenic 1/(0.49/0.37) 13.3 (10.4 J) 18.1 6.3 16.1

Cadmium 0.5/(0.20/0.040) 1.2 J+ 0.82 J+ 0.53 (0.34 J) 0.48

Lead 1/(0.49/0.25) 30.1 (17.5 J) 25.2 25.3 20.6

Reference Ref. 64, p. 51; Ref. 60, p. 64; Ref. 61, p. 64. Ref. 21, p. 29; Ref. 51, pp. 117, 120, 124, 138; Ref. 52. p. 28; Ref. 60, pp. 1, 3, 6, 8, 18, 78, 363-365, 594, 599, 604; Ref. 21, p. 29; Ref. 51, pp. 2, 5, 9, 16; Ref. 52, pp. 15-16; Ref. 61, pp. 1, 3, 8, 9, 13, 219-221, 560, 566, 570, Ref. 5, pp. 28-31, Appendix C, p. 56. Ref. 24, p. 3, Ref. 27, pp. 2,
3B, 3C, 3F, 3G, 3H, 9; Ref. 36, book 2, p. 3 & book 3, pp. 17- 18; Ref. 64. pp. 1, 4, 7, 9, 15, 79. Ref. 5, p. 28, & Appendix C, p. 55. Ref. 24, p. 2. Ref. 27, pp. 2, 3B, 3C, 3G, 3H, 10; Ref. 36, Book 2, p. 3; Ref 64, pp. 1, 4, 7, 9, 16, 80.

Bold Indicates background value selected for the contaminated landfill soil / mg/kg J The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity and is the approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample. J+ The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity, but the result may be biased high. ( ) Validated value prior to adjustment as per EPA Fact Sheet “Using Qualified Data to Document an Observed Release and Observed Contamination” (Ref. 43, 18 pages). mg/kg milligrams per kilogram

**ACM Smelter and Refinery – Background Samples 6-12 inch horizon collected in 2007 ( mg/kg) Analyte CRDL/MDL Jaycee Park

R04ST2400F112

CLP - MHIH27 Sampled

8/10/2007 North Middle

School

R08ST2601F112

CLP - MH1H35 Sampled 8/8/2007 6-12 inch sample

not collected in

2008 6-12 inch sample

not collected in

2008

Arsenic 1/0.49 17.2 (13.3 J) 23.1

- - Cadmium 0.5/0.20 0.43 J+ 0.67 J+

- - Lead 1/0.49 10.6 (12.9 J)18.6

- - Reference Ref. 60, p. 64; Ref. 61, p. 64. Ref. 21, pp. 29-32; Ref. 51, pp. 117, 120, 124, 139; Ref. 52. p. 28; Ref. 60, pp. 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 19, 117, 120, 124, 139, 366-368. Ref. 21, pp.29- 32; Ref. 51, pp. 2, 5, 9, 17; Ref. 52, pp. 15-16; Ref. 61, pp. 1, 3, 5, 8, 9, 14,

222-224 - -

Bold Indicates background value selected for the contaminated landfill soil / mg/kg J The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity and is the approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample. J+ The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity, but the result may be biased high. ( ) Validated value prior to adjustment as per EPA Fact Sheet “Using Qualified Data to Document an Observed Release and Observed Contamination” (Ref. 43, 18 pages). mg/kg milligrams per kilogramHRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 36 - MTD093291599 2.2.3 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AVAILABLE TO A PATHWAY

Containment Description Containment Value References

Gas release to air: NS

-

Particulate release to air: NS

- Release to groundwater: NS

- Release via overland migration and/or flood: No continuous maintained engineered cover, cap or soil cover is documented to be in place over the east ditch dump and waste was observed in the upper two feet of

soil at the site in 2003. There is no documentation of a run-on control system and run-off is allowed to flow

unchecked to concrete cha nnels which direct run-off

southward to the Missouri River. 10 Ref. 1, p. 51588, Table 2-2; p 51609, Table 4-2;

Ref 53, 1 page.

Notes: NS = Not Scored

2.4.2 HAZARDOUS WASTE QUANTITY

2.4.2.1.1 Hazardous Constituent Quantity

Description

There are no Hazardous Constituent Quantity data availabl e for the East Ditch Dump to calculate a Hazardous Constituent Quantity value.

Sum (pounds): Not available (NA) Hazardous Constituent Quantity Assigned Value: NA

2.4.2.1.2 Hazardous Wastestream Quantity

Description

There are no data available for the East Ditch Dump to calculate the Hazardous Wastestream Quantity.

Sum (pounds): NA Sum of Wastestream Quantity/5000 (Ref. 1, Table 2-5): NA Hazardous Wastestream Quantity Assigned Value: NA

2.4.2.1.3 Volume

Description :

The volume of contaminated soil at the East Ditch Dump has not been fully characterized; it is not possible to adequately determine the volume of this source.

Dimension of source (yd 3 ): NA Volume Assigned Value: 0HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 37 - MTD093291599 2.2.2.4.4 Area

Description

The area covered by the East Ditch Dump is currently not quantifiable; however as contamination has been documented at the source can be said to be unknown but greater than zero (see Source 2, section 2.2.2 of this HRS documentation record; Ref. 58, Appendix I).

Area Assigned Value: Unknown but >0

2.4.2.1.4 Source Hazardous Waste Quantity Value

>0/3,400 = >0

The Source Hazardous Waste Quantity Value for the East Ditch is unknown but > 0 (Ref. 1, Section 2.4.2.1.5, Table 2-5, p. 51591).

Source Hazardous Waste Quantity Value: > 0HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 38 - MTD093291599 2.2.1 SOURCE IDENTIFICATION

Name of the Source : Facility air emissions

Number of Source : 3

Source Type : Other

Description and Location of the source :

Processes at the former facility included smelting processes, electrolytic copper and zinc refining operations, and wire and rod milling operations. (Ref . 7, p. 5A) Former operations at the site resulted in the emission of hazardous substances to the air (Ref. 33, p. 1) A large smokestack, “the Big Stack” was constructed in 1908 to a length of 506 feet and a total height of 751 feet a bove the smelter’s blast furnace (Ref. 8 p. 7A). The Big Stack went into service on June 12, 1909 and continue d belching smoke until August 06, 1972 (Ref. 9, p. 15). Large quantities of flue dust, a by-product of smelti ng operation emissions, was generated at the facility and was documented to contain arsenic, lead, cadmium and other hazardous substances. (Ref. 58, pg. 13-14, Table 4-6) Internal ACM company correspondence from N ovember 1951 indicated that the amount of arsenic leaving the stack per twenty-four hours in the early 1950s was approximately 15.04 pounds (Ref. 33).HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 39 - MTD093291599 2.2.1.2 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES ASSOCIATED WITH THE SOURCE

During operations at the former facility, several by-p roducts were generated a nd managed on site including flue dust. The stack was designed to remove from the smelter all the gases and dust generated during the smelting process, yet some flue dust that did not exit th e stack was documented to accumulate as a solid waste product (Ref. 9, p. 20; 58, pg. 13-14). In the ear ly 1980s, a solid waste inventory was completed by Anaconda Minerals Company to characterize the vari ous wastes generated and deposited at the facility. During the solid waste inventory, the following hazardous s ubstances were detected in dust sampled at the toe of the main stack (also known as flue). (Ref. 58, pg. 13-14, Table 4-6).

Hazardous

Substance Result Range (ppm) References

Antimony 220 - 900 Ref. 58, Table 4-6

Arsenic 8,800 – 14,300 Ref. 58, Table 4-6

Cadmium 1,440 – 2,000 Ref. 58, Table 4-6

Chromium 100 - 130 Ref. 58, Table 4-6 Copper 4,050 - 5,600 Ref. 58, Table 4-6

Lead 12,100 - 55,000 Ref. 58, Table 4-6 Mercury 420 – 2,300 Ref. 58, Table 4-6

Selenium 50 - 100 Ref. 58, Table 4-6

Zinc 116,000 - 153,000 Ref. 58, Table 4-6HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 40 - MTD093291599 2.2.1.3 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AVAILABLE TO A PATHWAY

Containment Description Containment Value References

Gas release to air: NS

-

Particulate release to air:

Evidence of release of metals to air. No particulate containment systems in place at this source as described

in Table 6-9 of the HRS. 10 Ref. 1, Table 6-9;

Ref. 33

Release to groundwater: NS

- Release via overland migration and/or flood: NS

Notes: NS = Not Scored

2.4.2 HAZARDOUS WASTE QUANTITY

2.4.2.1.1 Hazardous Constituent Quantity

Description

There are no Hazardous Constituent Quantity data available for the residential soil in Black Eagle, Montana to calculate a Hazardous Constituent Quantity value.

Sum (pounds): Not available (NA) Hazardous Constituent Quantity Assigned Value: NA

2.4.2.1.2 Hazardous Wastestream Quantity

Description

The wastestream of facility air emissions was doc umented to contain hazardous substances; however,

insufficient information is available to calculate th e Hazardous Wastestream Quan tity. As such, a hazardous wastestream value of greater than 0 is assigned to this source.

Sum (pounds): > 0 Sum of Wastestream Quantity/5000 (Ref. 1, Table 2-5): > 0 Hazardous Wastestream Quantity Assigned Value: > 0

2.4.2.1.3 Volume

Description :

The volume of source 3 has not been fully characterized; it is not possible to adequately determine the volume

of this source.

Dimension of source (yd 3 ): NA Volume Assigned Value: 0

2.4.2.1.4 Area

DescriptionHRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 41 - MTD093291599 The area of source 3 has not been fully characterized; it is not possible to adequately determine the area of

this source.

Sum (square feet [ft 2 ]: NA Equation for Assigning Value (Ref. 1, Table 2-5): Area (A) / 34,000

Area Assigned Value: NA

2.4.2.1.5 Source Hazardous Waste Quantity Value

Source No. 3 is assigned a source HWQ value of greater than zero, but unknown. (Ref. 1, p. 51591, Table 2-5):

Source HWQ Value: > 0HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 42 - MTD093291599 2.2.1 SOURCE IDENTIFICATION

Name of the Source : Slag waste

Number of Source : 4

Source Type : Landfill

Description and Location of the source :

Large quantities of slag were generated at the former facility (Ref. 14, p. 1). In 1907, the Boston and Montana Consolidated Copper and Silver Mining Compan y estimated that the facility could receive up to 4800 tons a day of ore, and that changing the disposal of slag to railcar would significantly increase rail traffic (Ref. 14, p. 1).

A slag dump was identified and sampled during a 1983 sc reening study performed by the Anaconda Minerals Company and was documented to contain hazardous subs tances (Ref. 58, Table 3-3, Table 4-5). Deposition of slag waste at the site was documented, and a slag dump was observed during a 2003 ESI conducted by Tetra Tech EM Inc. for EPA. (Ref. 18, pg. 11, 17, 18) A sample was taken from the slag dump (Sample ID: AM-SO-06) located adjacent to the Missouri River w as documented to contain hazardous substances. (Ref. 18, pg. 18, 38, Table 2).

Source Sample Information

The source sample AM-SO-06 was collected in April 2003 during the Expanded Site Inspection conducted by Tetra Tech EM Inc. for EPA. The sample was analy zed through the EPA CLP, RAS for total metals. Soil samples for inorganic analysis were delivered to Sentin al Inc, of Huntsville, Alabama (Ref. 18, p. 3). The analytical data was validated by Tetra Tech, EM, Inc, of Chicago, IL on July 30, 2003 (Ref. 18, p. 56). Analytical results from the sample indicate the presence of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, and zinc. (Ref. 18, p. 100).HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 43 - MTD093291599 2.2.1.2 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES ASSOCIATED WITH THE SOURCE

On-site deposition of slag waste was documented duri ng an April 2003 during the Expanded Site Inspection conducted by Tetra Tech EM Inc. (Ref. 18, pg. 11, 17) Sample AM-SO-06 was collected from a slag dump

and was documented to contain hazardous substa nces. (Ref. 18, pg. 18, 39, 100, Table 2)

Hazardous

Substance Sample No. /

CLP No. Concentration (mg/kg)

Arsenic AM-SO-06 /

MX0XH6 217

Cadmium AM-SO-06 /

MX0XH6 189

Lead AM-SO-06 /

MX0XH6 3,120

Chromium AM-SO-06 /

MX0XH6 7.3

Copper AM-SO-06 /

MX0XH6 1,250

Nickel AM-SO-06 /

MX0XH6 14.1

Zinc AM-SO-06 /

MX0XH6 21,500 Ref. 18, p. 18, 39, 100,

Table 2-2HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 44 - MTD093291599 2.2.1.3 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AVAILABLE TO A PATHWAY

Containment Description Containment Value References

Gas release to air: NS

-

Particulate release to air: NS

- Release to groundwater: NS

- Release via overland migration and/or flood: No continuous maintained engineered cover, cap or soil cover is documented to be in place over the slag dump. There is no documentation of a run-on control system

and run-off is allowed to fl ow unchecked to concrete

channels which direct run-off southward to the Missouri

River. 10 Ref. 1, p. 51588, Table 2-2; p 51609, Table 4-2;

Ref 53, 1 page.

Notes: NS = Not Scored

2.4.2 HAZARDOUS WASTE QUANTITY

2.4.2.1.1 Hazardous Constituent Quantity

Description

There are no Hazardous Constituent Quantity data available for the residential soil in Black Eagle, Montana to calculate a Hazardous Constituent Quantity value.

Sum (pounds): Not available (NA) Hazardous Constituent Quantity Assigned Value: NA

2.4.2.1.2 Hazardous Wastestream Quantity

Description

There are no data available for Source 4 to calculate the Hazardous Wastestream Quantity.

Sum (pounds): NA Sum of Wastestream Quantity/5000 (Ref. 1, Table 2-5): NA Hazardous Wastestream Quantity Assigned Value: NA

2.4.2.1.3 Volume

Description :

The volume of source 4 has not been fully characterized; it is not possible to adequately determine the volume

of this source.

Dimension of source (yd 3 ): NA Volume Assigned Value: 0HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 45 - MTD093291599 2.4.2.1.4 Area

Description

The presence of hazardous substances at Source 4 sampl e AM-SO-06 has been documented (Ref. 18, p. 18, 39, 100, Table 2-2) However, the information available is not sufficient to adequately determine the area of

this source.

Sum (square feet [ft 2 ]: > 0 Equation for Assigning Value (Ref. 1, Table 2-5): Area (A) / 34,000

Area Assigned Value: > 0

2.4.2.1.5 Source Hazardous Waste Quantity Value

Source No. 4 is assigned a source HWQ value of greater than zero, but unknown (Ref. 1, p. 51591, Table 2-5):

Source HWQ Value: > 0HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 46 - MTD093291599 SUMMARY OF SOURCE DESCRIPTIONS

Available to Pathway (X)

Surface Water (SW) Air Source

No. Source

Hazardous

Waste Quantity

Value Source Hazardous

Constituent Quantity Complete? (Y/N) Groundwater (GW) Overland/

flood GW to

SW Gas Particulate

1 > 0 N NS X NS NS NS

2 > 0 N NS X NS NS NS

3 > 0 N NS NS NS NS X

4 > 0 N NS X NS NS NS

Total > 0

Description of Other Possible Sources :

Thirteen additional source areas on the ACM Smelter a nd Refinery property were identified and sampled in April of 2003 by Tetra Tech EM, Inc. for an EPA Expanded Site Inspection (Ref. 18, pp. 8, 18-22, 38). Soil cover of these sources ranged from non-existe nt to 10 inches deep (Ref. 1, p. 51646, Section 5.01; Ref. 18, p. 22). The contaminants associated with one or more of these sources included antimony, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, and zinc (Ref. 18, pages 19-20). Culverts have b een identified that drain surface water from the ACM Smelter and Refinery property directly into the Mi ssouri River (Ref. 23, p. 31). The following table describes these possible sources:

Samples of Other Possible Sources (Ref. 18, pp 18-20, 22, 32, 92, 93, 95-104, 117, 118)
Sample Location Description Sample

Number Contaminant Levels (ppm – mg/kg) Soil

Cover (inches) 

### Waste pile in zinc plant dump AM-SO-01 Cd – 70.8, Cu – 1,440, Pb – 5,190, Ag – 14.7, Zn – 20,700 8



### Former lagoon area AM-SO-02 Cd – 14.0, Cu – 346, Pb – 90, Ag – 2.8J, Zn – 1,350 6



### Landfill AM-SO-04 Cd – 1.7, Cu – 71.5, Pb – 17.3, Ag – .67J, Zn – 114 0



### West ditch dump AM-SO-05 Cd – 13.1, Cu – 239, Pb – 111, Ag – .8J, Zn – 2,150 4



### Electric copper Refinery AM-SO-07 Cd – 443, Cu – 2,370, Pb – 2,630, Ag – 30.2 J, Zn – 22,900 0



### Arsenic Plant AM-SO-08 Cd – 4.9, Cu – 669, Pb – 45.5, Ag – 1.9J, Zn – 322 10



### North of the electric copper Refinery AM-SO-09 Cd – 28.4, Cu – 13,400, Pb – 1,230, Ag – 91.9 J, Zn – 2,430 8



### Zinc plant AM-SO-10 Cd – 479, Cu – 2,530, Pb – 7,070, Ag – 48 J, Zn – 38,700 0



### Aluminum rolling

mill AM-SO-11 Cd – 17.6, Cu – 8,090, Pb – 371, Ag – 3 J, Zn – 3,200 0HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 47 - MTD093291599 

### Copper rod mill AM-SO-12 Cd – 3.9, Cu – 2,470, Pb – 107, Ag – .38 UJ, Zn – 672 0



### West of the general laboratory AM-SO-13 Cd – 1.1U, Cu – 30, Pb – 10.2, Ag – 2.1 UJ, Zn – 119 9



### West of the general laboratory AM-SO-14 Cd – 303, Cu – 4,360, Pb – 1,350, Ag – 9.4J, Zn – 5,810 8



### Near smelter buildings AM-SO-15 Cd – 180, Cu – 721, Pb – 40, Ag – 3.7J, Zn – 1,970 5

J The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is the approximate concentration in the sample U the analyte was analyzed for, but was not det ected above the reported sample quantitation limit. ppm parts per million mg/kg milligrams per kilogramHRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 48 - MTD093291599HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 49 - MTD093291599 4.0 SURFACE WATER MIGRATION PATHWAY

4.1 OVERLAND/FLOOD MIGRATION COMPONENT

4.1.1.1 Definition of Hazardous Substance Migration Path for Overland/Flood Component

Four sources have been evaluated as part of the HRS sco ring at the ACM Smelter and Refinery site, three of which are evaluated as contributing hazardous substances to surface water. The first source, Source 1, the contaminated soil in the community of Black Eagle (Ref. 22, p. 2) would enter the surface water pathway of the Missouri River via a series of culverts draining surface water runoff from the community into the Missouri

River. All outfall culvert locations are on the north bank of the Missouri River and are identified from information provided by the Cascade County Public Works Department (Ref. 55, 12 pages; Ref. 59, pp. 1-2).

The five of the outfall locations are listed in the fo llowing table. A map showing the locations is also provided (Ref. 50, 1 page).

Outfalls draining from Contaminated Residential Soil to the Missouri River (Ref. 50, p. 2; Ref. 55, 11 pages; Ref. 59, pp. 1-2)

Outlet Name Outfall Location Outfall Description Drainage Area Responsible Party
PPE#1, North

River Road 9 th to
15 th Street-No. 2 630 feet east of

10 th Street Bridge 24-inch diameter corrugated steel pipe 37 acres

Western Black Eagle Cascade County

PPE#2, North

River Road 9 th to
15 th Street-No. 3 1,400 feet east of

10 th Street Bridge 24-inch diameter corrugated steel pipe 8 acres

Western Black

Eagle along

Missouri River Cascade County

PPE#3, 15 th Street Bridge North 60 feet west of 15 th
Street Bridge 30-inch diameter corrugated 132 acres

Central Black Eagle MDT and Cascade County

PPE#4, Black Eagle South East East of 15 th Street Bridge under

North River Rd. 20-inch diameter corrugated steel pipe 22 acres

South central Black Eagle Cascade County

PPE#5, Anaconda

Hills West

(Coulee) 380 feet west of Black Eagle Dam Twin 36-inch diameter corrugated steel pipes 188 acres

Eastern Black Eagle, Moose Lodge, and golf

course Cascade County

The most upstream outfall for surface water runoff from th e contaminated soil identified in the unincorporated community of Black Eagle would be outfall North River Road 9 th to 15 th Street No. 2 (PPE # 1) with a drainage area of approximately 37 acres ( Ref 50, 1 page; Re f. 55, p. 7; Ref. 59, pp. 1-2). This outlet captures runoff from western edge of the community of Black Eagle and delivers the runoff through the outfall to the Missouri River (Ref. 50; Ref. 59, pp. 1-2). PPE # 2 delivers runoff from approximately 8 acres in western Black Eagle along the Missouri River to the river at the outfall named North River Road 9 th to 15 th Street. PPE # 3 drains approximately 132 acres in central Black Eagle to the Missouri River at the outfall named 15 th
Street Bridge North. PPE # 4 drains approximately 22 acres in south central Black Eagle at the outfall named Black Eagle South East. The eastern area of Black Eagle, approximately 188 acres including the Moose Lodge and the northeast quadrant of the golf course, drains through PPE # 5 into the Missouri River (Ref. 55, pp. 1-11; Ref. 50, 1 page; Ref. 59, pp.1-2). The su rface water pathway for source 1-residential soil, would continue through Black Eagle Dam, past the sam ple collection locations of the 2003 and 2009 EPA investigations, through Rainbow Dam a nd Morony Dam to the 15-mile target distance limit (TDL) (Ref. 50, 1 page).HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 50 - MTD093291599 The probable point of entry (PPE #6) for wastes associated with source 2-the East Ditch Dump on the ACM Smelter and Refinery property is shown on the surface wate r pathway map (Figure 1; Ref. 18, p. 38; Ref. 50; Ref. 58, Appendix I). The overland flow route from the East Ditch Dump to the Missouri River is south off the ridge to the river through a gully for approximately 400 feet to the Missouri River at PPE #6 (Figure 1; Ref. 4, map 1; Ref. 50; Ref. 58, Appendix I). The ove rland flow route from source 4, the slag waste, to the Missouri River is south off the ridge for approxi mately 500 feet to the Missouri River at PPE #7 (Figure 1; Ref. 4, map 1; Ref. 58, pg. 39). However, other sour ces at the facility likely also have potential to release by overland flow due to lack of cover, the natural slope of the land toward the Missouri River, and culverts that drain surface water directly into the Missouri River (Ref. 18, p. 19, 20, 22, 32, & 38; Ref. 23, p. 31). The surface water pathway from PPE#6 would continue past the sample collection locations of the 2003 and 2009 EPA investigations, through Rainbow Dam and Morony Dam to the 15-mile target distance limit (TDL) (Figure 1; Ref. 50, 1 page).

No information was found regarding existing surface wa ter intakes on the 15-mile downstream segment.

The stretch of the Missouri River between Black Eagle Dam and Rainbow Dam is an active fishery. Fishing was observed by the sampling team during the 2009 Expanded Site Inspection (Ref. 23, pp. 28 & 33). The Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks es timates that a population of 1,292 rainbow trout and 302 brown trout are found in the 1.5 mile stretch between Black Eagle Dam and Giant Springs State Park (Ref. 34, p. 1). The fish that are caught along this stretch of th e river are eaten by the anglers and their families (Ref. 44, 1 page; Ref. 45, 1 page ; and Ref. 46, 1 page).

Approximately 0.1 mile of HRS eligible wetland frontage has been identified in the Missouri River within the zone of actual contamination by the US Fish and Wild life Service as part of the National Wetlands Inventory (Ref. 35, pp. 1-3).

Recreational use of the Missouri River downstream of Bl ack Eagle Dam include Giant Springs State Park and its associated fish hatchery and a recreational walking and cycling path, the River’s Edge Trail (Ref. 40, pp. 1-4; Ref. 41, p. 1).

4.1.2.1 Likelihood of Release

4.1.2.1.1 Observed Release

Direct Observation

The Boston and Montana smelter routinely dumped large quantities of granulated slag and tailings into the Missouri River (Ref. 6, p. 42; Ref. 15, p. 1). In 1907, the Boston and Montana Consolidated Copper and Silver Mining Company estimated that the facility c ould receive up to 4800 tons a day of ore and changing the disposal of slag to railcar woul d significantly increase rail traffic (Ref. 14, p. 1). The Montana Department of Environmental Quality (Montana DEQ) estimates that between 27,500,000 and 31,000,000 cubic yards of waste were dumped into the Missouri River between 1893 and 1915 until onsite containment was instituted in 1915. So much smelter waste was dumped into the Missouri River between 1893 and 1915 that the management and legal department of the Boston and Montana Company were concerned that the Federal Government would intervene and enjoin the deposition of tailings into the Missouri River by virtue of the constitutional provisions requiring the fe deral government to maintain navigable streams (Ref. 15, pp. 1 and 2). In 1884 Judge Lorenzo Sawyer of the United St ates Circuit Court in San Francisco had granted a perpetual injunction against hydraulic mining in Calif ornia’s American River on these very grounds (Ref. 6, p. 38).HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 51 - MTD093291599 Numerous complaints were filed by property owners a nd communities along the Missouri River downstream of the ACM Smelter and Refinery of water quality issues and slag and smelter waste clogging the Missouri River (Ref. 6, p. 42; Ref. 29, p. 8A). These complaints increased after the 1908 flood of the Missouri River inundated the community of Fort Benton, 40 miles dow nstream of the Boston and Montana Smelter with smelter waste (Ref. 6, p. 38; Ref. 29, p. 8A). A company analysis of slime (very fine grained slag and tailings, which tended to float in the Missouri River) taken above Rainbow Falls Dam in 1914 indicated that the slime contained between .55 and 1.1 percent copper (Ref. 17, p. 1). The Boston and Montana Company sought to buy off disgruntled prope rty owners and placate communities by providing alternate domestic water sources (Ref. 6, pp. 49-51).

Source 4, a slag source located adjacent to the Mi ssouri River, was documented to contain hazardous substances (arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, manganese, and zinc; (see Source 4 Section 2.2.2 of this HRS documentation record) (Ref. 18, p. 18, 39, 100, Table 2-2). Slag waste generated at the facility and deposited in site landfills adjacent to the Missouri River was also documented as dumped into the Missouri River (Ref. 6, p. 42; Ref. 15, p. 1). Slag material was observed to be in the sediments of the Missouri River adjacent to the slag source and the former ACM Smelter and Refinery facility (Figure 1; Ref. 23, p. 202).

Chemical Analysis

Eight sediment samples from the Missouri River were collected by Tetra Tech EM, Inc for the EPA’s Expanded Site Inspection in April 2003. These samples were collected from the north bank of the Missouri River and consisted of medium to medium fine grai ned tan particles (Ref. 54, 1 page). All samples were analyzed through the EPA CLP, RAS for TAL total me tals. Soil samples for inorganic analysis were delivered to Sentinal Inc, of Huntsville, Alabama (Ref. 18, p. 3). The analytical data was validated by Tetra Tech, EM, Inc, of Chicago, IL on July 30, 2003 (Ref. 18, p. 56). The following table provides analytical data to document the observed release by chemical analysis with the background sample and the most downstream samples with results greater than three times background (Ref. 18, Table 5, pp. 49-50).

Analyses of sediment samples collected during the April 2003 sampling event indicate that concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, manganese, and zinc ar e significantly above background concentrations in the

Missouri River for a distance of 2.39 miles downstream of the probable point of entry (PPE) at the Black Eagle Dam (Ref. 18, p. 39, Figure 3). According to the HRS, if an observed release can be established, a value of 550 is assigned for Likelihood of Rel ease (Ref. 1, Section 4.1.2.1.1, p. 51609).

Seven release sediment samples were collected by START for the EPA Region 8 on July 14, 2009. All release samples were collected by boat from the north side of the Missouri River from beneath the water. A background sample (AGFSED1) was collected from the north bank of the Missouri River, downstream of the Montana Refining Company facility and upstream of the outfall North River Road 9 th to 15 th Street No. 3 (PPE#1) and the community of Black Eagle (Ref. 50, 1 page). The samples were analyzed by Compuchem Laboratory in Cary, North Carolina, for total Target Analyte List (TAL) metals analysis with a supporting Level 4 data package (Ref. 23, pp 6, 15, & 21). The data package was validated by a START chemist who determined that the background cadmium result was bi ased high as well as two downstream results (Ref. 23, pp. 77-198). The analytical data was revised in acco rdance with the EPA guidelines for using qualified data, which resulted in the high bias for the background sample being retained while the two downstream, analytical results were revised downward (Ref. 43, pp. 1-9, 18). The following table provides analytical data to document the observed release by chemical analysis.

Analyses of sediment samples collected during the July 2009 sampling event indicate that concentrations of lead are above background concentrations in the Miss ouri River for a distance of 2.39 miles downstream of the probable point of entry (PPE 1) (Ref. 50). According to the HRS, if an observed release can be established, a value of 550 is assigned for Likelihood of Release (Ref. 1, Section 4.1.2.1.1, p. 51609).HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 52 - MTD093291599Sediment Samples Collected from the Missouri River adjacent and downstream of the ACM Smelter and Refinery, July 2009Sample IDSample LocationSampleDateCadmium(Cd)mg/kgLead(Pb)mg/kgCRQL/ReferencesAGFSED10907118-01Background Sample at 11thStreet07/14/090.36 J+12.3Cd :0.06Pb: 0.21-Ref. 2, p. BII-2, BII-8; Ref.23, pp. 28, 30, 37, 40, 46, 69,70, 85, 174-176, 177, 179,182, 183, 190, 204.AGFSED20907118-021.89 miles downstream of PPE No. 107/14/09(11.7 J+)8.3168Cd: 0.06Pb: 0.21-Ref. 2, p. BII-2, BII-8; Ref.23, pp. 28, 30, 37, 40, 47, 69,70, 85, 174-176., 177, 179,182, 183, 191, 202.AGFSED30907118-031.95 miles downstream of PPE No. 107/14/0911.878.4Cd: 0.06Pb: 0.21Ref. 2, p. BII-2, BII-8; Ref.23, pp. 28, 31, 37, 40, 48, 69,70, 85, 174-176, 177, 182,192, 202.AGFSED40907118-042.06 miles downstream of PPE No. 107/14/093.918.9Cd: 0.06Pb: 0.21Ref. 2, p. BII-2, BII-8; Ref.23, pp. 28, 31, 37, 40, 49, 69,70, 85, 174-176, 177, 182,193, 202.AGFSED50907118-052.39 miles downstream of PPE No. 107/14/09(4.2 J+)2.949.9Cd: 0.06Pb: 0.21Ref. 2, p. BII-2, BII-8; Ref.23, pp. 28, 32, 37, 40, 50, 69,70, 85, 174-176, 177, 179,182, 183, 194, 202-203.Notes:J+ The analyte was positively identified; theassociated numerical value is the approximate concentration of the analyte in thesample, but is biased high.( ) Value prior to correction (Ref. 43, p. 13)mg/kg milligrams per kilogramCRQL Contract Required Quantitation LimitSCDM Superfund Chemical Data MatrixHRS Documentation RecordACM Smelter and RefineryMarch 2011- 53 -MTD093291599HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 54 - MTD093291599 Attribution:

Residential soil contamination in the unincorporated residential community of Black Eagle located on the

north bank of the Missouri River across from Great Fa lls, Montana, was first documented by the EPA’s 2003 Expanded Site Inspection when elevated concentrati ons of hazardous substances such as arsenic, cadmium, and lead were found in one or more samples (Ref. 4, map 1; Ref. 18, pp. 28-30).

The 2007 EPA CERCLA Site Assessment sampled residences on both the north and south sides of the Missouri River adjacent to the Anaconda Minerals Co, Great Falls Refinery (Ref. 21, p. 11). Of the eleven residences sampled in Great Falls on the south side of the Missouri River in August of 2007 only one residence had an elevated concentration of arsenic (Ref . 21, p. 13). The results of the 2007 investigation of the residential soil in the community of Black Eagl e identified an area of arsenic, cadmium, and lead concentrations greater than three times background cente red on eastern and central Black Eagle (Ref. 21, p. 13-14, 18).

The 2008 EPA CERCLA Expanded Site Investigation was focused in the unincorporated community of Black Eagle, Montana. The residential soil at fifty nine r esidential properties in Black Eagle was sampled in July 2008 to a depth of one foot (Ref. 5, p. 1). Concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, and lead elevated three times background were detected in the residential soil in Bl ack Eagle centered on the central and southwestern area of Black Eagle (Ref. 5, p. 13; Ref. 22, pp. 1-2).

The East Ditch Dump and fourteen additional source areas on the ACM Smelter and Refinery property were identified and sampled in April of 2003 by Tetra Tech EM, Inc. for an EPA Expanded Site Inspection (Ref. 18, pp. 8, 18-22, 38). There is no record of mainta ined engineered run on and run off structures and the observations of the soil cover of the sources during the 2003 sampling event ranged from non-existent to 10 inches deep which makes the contam inants from these sources available for migration (Ref. 1, p. 51646, Section 5.01; Ref. 18, p. 22). The contaminates associated with one or more of these sources included antimony, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, and zinc (Ref. 18, pp. 19-20). Culverts have been identified that drain surface water from the ACM Smelter and Refinery property directly into th e Missouri River (Ref. 18, pp. 28, 31, ).

Sediment samples from the north bank of the Missouri River were collected by boat on July 14, 2009 (Ref. 23, p. 16). The samples were shipped to CompuChem in Cary, North Carolina on July 15, 2009 (Ref. 23, p. 41). The analytical results were validated by URS Op erating Services on July 24, 2009 (Ref. 23, p. 177). The sediment sample material was a grey to brown fine to medium grain size river sand with small to medium sized grains of black and rust colored cindery materi al mixed with the sand (Ref. 23, p. 202). The grab samples of sediment were analyzed for metals by EPA CLP method SW846 (Ref. 23, p. 40). Cadmium and lead elevated three times background was detected fo r a total distance of 2.39 miles downstream of PPE #1 (Ref. 23, p. 23; Ref. 50).

The Boston and Montana smelter routinely dumped large quantities of granulated slag and tailings into the Missouri River (Ref. 6, p. 42; Ref. 15, p. 1). In 1907, the Boston and Montana Consolidated Copper and Silver Mining Company estimated that the facility c ould receive up to 4800 tons a day of ore and changing the disposal of slag to railcar would significantly increase rail traffic (Ref. 14, p. 1). The Montana Department of Environmental Quality (Montana DEQ) estimates that between 27,500,000 and 31,000,000 cubic yards of waste were dumped into the Miss ouri River between 1893 and 1915 until onsite containment was instituted in 1915. Montana DEQ also reports that it is possible that dumping of waste into the Missouri

River continued at a reduced rate after 1915 until the fac ility closed in the 1970s (Ref. 16, p. 1). So much smelter waste was dumped into the Missouri River between 1893 and 1915 that th e management and legal department of the Boston and Montana Company were concerned that the Federal Government would intervene and enjoin the deposition of tailings into the Missouri River by virtue of the constitutionalHRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 55 - MTD093291599 provisions requiring the federal government to maintain navigable stream s (Ref. 15, pp. 1 and 2). In 1884 Judge Lorenzo Sawyer of the United States Circuit Court in San Francisco had granted a perpetual injunction against hydraulic mining in California’s American River on these very grounds (Ref. 6, p. 38).

Numerous complaints were filed by property owners a nd communities along the Missouri River downstream of the ACM Smelter and Refinery of water quality issues and slag and smelter waste clogging the Missouri River (Ref. 6, p. 42; Ref. 29, p. 8A). These complaints increased after the 1908 flood of the Missouri River inundated the community of Fort Benton, 40 miles dow nstream of the Boston and Montana Smelter with smelter waste (Ref. 6, p. 38; Ref. 29, p. 8A). A company analysis of slime (very fine grained slag and tailings, which tended to float in the Missouri River) taken above Rainbow Falls Dam in 1914 indicated that the slime contained between .55 and 1.1 percent copper (Ref. 17, p. 1). The Boston and Montana Company sought to buy off disgruntled prope rty owners and placate communities by providing alternate domestic water sources (Ref. 6, pp. 49-51).

Cindery slag material was also currently observed to be in the sediments of the Missouri River adjacent to the ACM Smelter and Refinery facility (Ref. 23, p. 57 and 202, Ref, 53 p. 1; Ref. 54, p. 1).

The former Montana Silver Smelter site is located on the south bank of the Missouri River in Giant Springs State Park, approximately 2.85 miles east-northeast of the 15 th Street Bridge (Ref. 4, 2 pages; Ref. 50, p. 1). The Montana Silver Smelter was constructed in 1888 by Gr eat Falls city father, Paris Gibson (Ref. 56, p. 2). The smelter had two small stacks. Many of the structur es at Giant Springs State Park and Giant Springs State Fish Hatchery were built on mineral processing wastes th at contained extremely high levels of arsenic and lead. This property was cleaned up by the Montan a Mine Waste Cleanup Bureau’s Abandoned Mine Lands Program in 2004 (Ref. 57, pp. 9-11). The Montana Refining Company facility is located upstream of the unincorporated community of Black Eagle on the north bank of the Missouri River (Ref. 50, 1 map). The Montana Refining Company produces various grades of g asoline, diesel, jet fuel, distillates, and high grade asphalt products (Ref. 65, 1 page.). The facility has an operable capacity of 9,500 barrels per calendar day ranking the facility as number 132 of the 143 U.S. Refineries (Ref. 66, p. 4).

Both of the operations could potentia lly have contributed to the contam ination documented in the Missouri River; however, the contamination found in the Missouri Ri ver sediments is at least partially attributable to the sources found on the ACM Smelter and Refinery property because of the evidence presented above.

4.1.2.1.2 Potential to Release

Potential to Release by overland flow was not evalua ted because an observed release was established (Ref. 1 Section 4.1.2.1.2, p. 51609).HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 56 - MTD093291599 4.1.3.2 Human Food Chain Threat Waste Characteristics

4.1.3.2.1 Toxicity/Persistence/Bioaccumulation

Hazardous

Substance Source

No. Toxicity

Factor

Value Persistence

Factor

Value* Bioaccumulation

Value** Toxicity/

Persistence/

Bioaccumulation

Factor Value (Table 4-16) References

Arsenic 1, 2, 4 10,000 1.0 5.0 5 X 10 4 Ref. 2, p. BI-1

Cadmium 1, 2, 4 10,000 1.0 5,000 5 X 10 7 Ref. 2, p. BI-2

Lead 1, 2, 4 10,000 1.0 5.0 5 X 10 4 Ref. 2, p. BI-8

Manganese 2 10,000 1.0 50,000 5 x 10 8 Ref. 2, p. BI-8

Zinc 2, 4 10 1.0 5.0 50 Ref. 2, p. BI-12

Notes: * Persistence value for Rivers

** Bioaccumulation factor value for Freshwater

The hazardous substance with the highest Toxicity/Persi stence/Bioaccumulation Factor Value is selected (that
for manganese): 5 x 10 8 (Ref. 1, Section 4.1.3.2.1.4, Table 4-16; Ref. 2, p.BI-8).

Toxicity/Persistence/Bioaccumulation Factor Value: 5 x 10 8

4.1.3.2.2 Hazardous Waste Quantity

Source No. Source Type Source Hazardous Waste Quantity

1 Contaminated Soil > 0

2 Landfill > 0

4 Landfill > 0

Total

- 1

The source hazardous waste quantity value is assigned as the Hazardous Waste Quantity Factor Value (Ref. 1, Section 2.4.2.2). Although a Hazardous Waste Quantity Fact or Value of 1 is assigned to a site whose sum of Source Hazardous Waste Quantity Values is greater than 1 but less than or equal to 100 (Ref. 1, Table 2-6, p. 51591), the presence of targets subject to Level II contamin ation and the fact that Tier A was not adequately determined means that the calculated value, or 100, whichever is greater, may be assigned (Ref. 1, Sec. 2.4.2.2, p. 51592).

Hazardous Waste Quantity Factor Value (100 >1)

Hazardous Waste Quantity Factor Value: 100 (Ref. 1, p. 51591, Table 2-6)

4.1.3.2.3 Waste Characteristics Factor Category Value

Toxicity/Persistence/Bioaccumulation Factor Value: 5 x 10 8
Hazardous Waste Quantity Factor Value: 100HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 57 - MTD093291599 Toxicity/Persistence x Hazardous Waste Quantity: 1 x 10 6
Toxicity/Persistence/Hazardous Waste Quantity x Bioaccumulation: 5 x 10 10

Waste Characteristics Factor Cate gory Value: 320 (Ref. 1, Sec. 2.4.2.2, p. 51592, Table 2-7)

4.1.3.3 Human Food Chain Threat Targets

Actual Human Food Chain Contamination

Targets are documented within the zone of actual contamin ation. The zone of cont amination begins at PPE 1 and continues a distance of 2.39 miles downstream of the furthest downstream observed release sample containing a hazardous substance with a bioaccumulation potential factor value of 500 or greater, which is located at sample location AGFSED5 (Ref. 1, Sec. 4.1.3. 3; Ref. 50). Level II concentrations of cadmium were detected sediment samples within the zone of contamination.

Sample ID Sample

Medium Distance

from PPE Hazardous

Substance Bio-accumulation

Factor Value References

AGFSED5

(0907118-5) Missouri

River

Sediment 2.39 miles Cadmium 5,000 Ref. 2, p. BI-8

Ref. 23, p. 23;

Ref. 50

- Closed Fisheries:

The state of Montana has not declared any portion of the surface water pathway a closed fishery.

- Fish Tissue:

Fish tissue samples were collected by ARCO’s contractor Paramatrix in 2004. Paramatrix concluded that the concentrations in tissue were largely comparable between upstream (background) and downstream (site) areas. A statistical analysis of the analytical data was not performed (Ref. 19, p. 3). A review of the report by the EPA’s Regional Ecological toxicologist noted that at three sample locations ecotoxicological benchmarks were exceeded in soil samples, and it is likely that higher concentrations of metals in all samples could have been obtained by taking samples on the north side of the Mi ssouri River, which is the same side as the facility rather than across from the facility on the south bank of the Missouri River (Ref. 20, p. 1, 2).

Level I Fisheries

The Missouri River is not documented as having fisheries subject to Level I actual contamination (Ref. 1, p. 51620).

Most Distant Level II Sample

The most distant Level II observed release sediment sample, 2.39 miles downstream of PPE #1 (Ref. 23, p. 28, Ref. 50, 1 page).

Level II Fisheries

The zone of Level II contamination in the Missouri River extends 2.39 miles from PPE 1 (the most upstream PPE) to the farthest downstream sample station, AGFSED5 (Section 4.1.2.1.1; Ref. 50). Cadmium at Level IIHRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 58 - MTD093291599 concentrations was documented within this sample, whic h is located within the Missouri River fishery. (Ref. 50; Ref. 23, pp. 32, Ref. 44)

Identity of Fishery Extent of Level II Fishery (Relative to PPE) Refs.

Missouri River 2.39 miles Ref. 23, p. 28; Ref. 34, p. 2; Ref. 50, 1 page; Ref. 44, Ref. 45; Ref. 46.

4.1.3.3.1 Food Chain Individual

Actual contamination of the Missouri River fishery w as documented by Level II concentrations in sediment sample AGFSED5 (0907118-05). The stretch of the Miss ouri River between Black Eagle Dam and Rainbow Dam is an active fishery. Fishing was observed a nd photo documented by the sampling team during the 2009 Expanded Site Inspection at the Rainbow Boat Ramp . Photo documentation of fishing and a statement attesting to the consumption of fish caught in that r each of the Missouri River at the Rainbow Boat Ramp is documented (Ref. 23, pp. 27, 28, 33; Ref. 44, 1 page; Ref. 45; Ref. 46, 1 page). The Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks estimates that a population of 1,292 rainbow trout and 302 brown trout are found in the 1.5 mile stretch between Black Eagle Dam and Giant Sp rings State Park (Ref. 34, p. 1). The fish that are caught along this stretch of the river are eaten by the anglers and their families (Ref. 44, 1 page; Ref. 46, 1 page). This fishery is subject to Level II concentra tions, due to a release of a contaminant with a BCF of greater than or equal to 500 (cadmium); a value of 45 is assigned to the Human Food Chain Individual Factor Value (Ref. 1, Sec. 4.1.3.3.1 and Sec. 4.1.3.3).

Food Chain Individual Factor Value: 45

4.1.3.3.2 Population

4.1.3.3.2.1 Level I Concentrations

Not applicable

Level I Concentrations Factor Value: 0

4.1.3.3.2.2 Level II Concentrations

The extent of the Level II contamination of the Missour i River fishery is 2.39 miles (distance from the most upstream PPE (PPE #1) in Missouri River at 11 th Street in Black Eagle, Montana to Sample AGFSED05 (Ref. 23, p. 28; Ref. 50). Exact productivity values for the Miss ouri River fishery are not available. Therefore, to be conservative, a value of >0 but, unknown will be used for production values in the Missouri River. For an annual production of greater than 0 to 100 pounds per y ear, a Human Food Chain Population Value of 0.03 is assigned as the Level II concentrations factor value (R ef. 1, Section 4.1.3.3.2.2, p. 51621, Table 4-18).

Identity of Fishery Annual Production (pounds) References Human Food Chain Population Value (Table 4-18)

Missouri River >0.0 lb./acre Ref. 1, Sec 4.1.3.3.2.2,

p. 51621 0.03

Sum of Level II Human Food Chain Population Values: 0.03HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 59 - MTD093291599 Level II Concentrations Factor Value: 0.03

4.1.3.3.2.3 Potential Human Food Chain Contamination

The Missouri River downstream of sample location AG FSED05 to the 15-mile TDL may be considered a fishery subject to potential contamination. Sediment samples have not been collected below Rainbow Dam to the 15-mile TDL. Values for the amount of human food chain organisms produced annually from these fisheries have not been estimated, but are evaluated a greater than 0 pounds per acre.

Identity of

Fishery Annual

Production

(pounds) Type of Surface Water Body Average

Annual Flow (cfs) Ref. Population Value (P i ) (Table 4-18) Dilution Weight (D i ) (Table 4-13) P i x D i

Missouri

River >0 large stream to river 6733 cfs Ref. 1,

p. 51613,

51621

Ref. 13,

p. 3 0.03 0.001 0.00003

Sum of P i x D i : 0.00003 (Sum of P i x D i )/10: 0.000003

Potential Human Food Chain Contamination Factor Value: 0.000003

Potential Human Food Chain contamination value: 0.000003

4.1.3.3.2.4 Calculation of Population Factor Value

The population factor value is calculated by summing the value of Level I concentration (0), Level II concentration (0.03) and potential human food chain c ontamination factors (0.000003). The resulting value is assigned the population factor value for the waters hed (Ref. 1, p. 51621, Section 4.1.3.3.2.4).

Calculations: (0) + (0.03) + (0.000003) = 0.030003

4.1.3.3.3 Calculation of a Human Food Chain Threat - Target Factor Category Value

The Human Food Chain Threat-Target Factor Category Value is calculated by summing the Food Chain Individual (45) and Population Factor Value of the watershed (0.030003). The resulting value, 45.030003, is assigned as the Human Food Chain Threat-Target Score (Ref. 1, p. 51620, Sec. 4.1.3.3.2).

Food Chain Target Factor Category Value: 45.030003

4.1.3.4 Calculation of a Human Food Chain Threat Score for a Watershed

The Human Food Chain Threat is calculated by multiplying the Human Food Chain Threat Factor Category Value for likelihood of release (550), Waste Characteris tics (320) and Targets for a Watershed (45.030003). The product is rounded to the nearest integer and divi ded by 82,500. The resulting value, subject to a maximum of 100, is assigned as the Human Food Chain Threat Score for the watershed (Ref. 1, p. 51621, Sec. 4.1.3.4).HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 60 - MTD093291599 Calculations: (Likelihood of Release 550)(Waste Characteristics Value 320)(Targets 45.030003) = 7,925,280.5

7,925,280.5/82,500 = 96.06

Human Food Chain Threat Score: 96.06HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 61 - MTD093291599 4.1.4.2 Environmental Threat Waste Characteristics

4.1.4.2.1 Ecosystem Toxicity/Persistence/Bioaccumulation

The Ecosystem Toxicity/Persistence/Bioaccumulation Valu es are based on the contaminants detected in the

Source and the observed release.

Hazardous

Substance Source

No. Ecotoxicity**

Factor Value Persistence

Factor

Value***

(River) Bioaccumulation

Factor Value (Env./Fresh) Ecotoxicity/

Persistence/

Bioaccumulation

Factor Value Ref.

Arsenic 1, 2, 4 10 1.0 5,000 5 X 10 4 Ref. 2, p.

BI-1

Cadmium 1, 2, 4 10,000 1.0 50,000 5 X 10 8 Ref. 2, p.

BI-2

Lead 1, 2, 4 1,000 1.0 50,000 5 X 10 7

Manganese 2 0 1.0 50,000 0 Ref. 2, p. BI-8

Zinc 2, 4 10 1.0 50,000 5 X 10 5 Ref. 2, p.

BI-12

** Ecotoxicity values assigned are based on the predominant surface water category of fresh water. *** Persistence values assigned are based on the predominant surface water body category “River.”

Cadmium has the highest Ecosystem Toxicity/Persistence/Bioaccumulation Factor Value for this Watershed,

5 x 10 8 (Ref. 1, Table 4-21; Ref. 2, p.BI-2). Cadmium was selected to assign the value to this factor as directed by HRS Section 4.1.4.2.1.4 (Ref. 1, Section 4.1.4.2.1.4).

Ecosystem Toxicity/Persistence/Bioaccumulation Factor Value: 5 x 10 8

4.1.4.2.2 Hazardous Waste Quantity

The factor value derived for the drinking water threat or the human food chain threat hazardous waste quantity (100) is assigned to the environmental threat hazardous waste quantity factor value as directed by HRS Section 4.1.4.2.2 (Ref. 1, Section 4.1.4.2.2).

Hazardous Waste Quantity Value: 100

4.1.4.2.3. Waste Characteristics Factor Category Value

The waste characteristics factor category value is de rived by first multiplying the ecotoxicity/persistence factor value and the hazardous waste quantity factor va lue for the watershed (subject to a maximum of 1 x

10 8 ). This product is then multiplied with the ecosyst em bioaccumulation potential factor value for this hazardous substance as presented in Section 4.1.4.2.1 of this HRS documentation record (subject to a

maximum value of 1 x 10 12 ) (Ref. 1, Section 4.1.4.2.3).HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 62 - MTD093291599 Ecosystem Toxicity / Persistence Factor Value = 10,000 Hazardous Waste Quantity Factor Value = 100

10,000 x 100 = 1 x 10 6

Ecosystem toxicity/persistence factor value
x hazardous waste quantity factor value: 1 x 10 6

Ecosystem Bioaccumulation Potential Factor Value = 50,000

(Ecosystem toxicity/persistence x hazardous waste quantity factor value) x bioaccumulation potential factor value:
(100 x 10,000) x (50,000) = 5 x 10 10

(Subject to a maximum of 1x10 12 )

The value calculated is 5 x 10 10 

### . A s directed by the HRS, this value is applied to HRS Table 2-7 to determine the Waste Characteristics Factor Category Value (Ref. 1, Sections 2.4.3.2 and 4.1.4.2.3, Table 2-7). Hazardous Waste Quantity Factor Value: 100

Waste Characteristics Factor Category Value: 320

4.1.4.3 Environmental Threat - Targets

Wetlands along the banks of the Missouri River and on Black Eagle Island and Steamboat Island in the Missouri River are identified by the U.S. Fish and Wild life Service as part of the National Wetlands Inventory (Ref. 35, pp 1-3). Most of the wetlands immediately below Black Eagle Dam are classified as Riverine Perennial wetlands, and Palustrine Em ergent wetlands are identified further downstream of the Black Eagle Dam within the zone of documented contamination (Ref . 35, pp 1-3). Most of the wetlands identified on the

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inve ntory Map for Northeast and Northwest Great Falls Montana within the zone of actual contamination qua lify as eligible wetlands defined in 40 CFR Sec 230.2 because most of these wetland types are likely to contai n a prevalence of wetland plant species based on their classification such as the palustrine emergent wetlands mentioned above.

4.1.4.3.1 Sensitive Environments

4.1.4.3.1.1 Level I Concentrations

Level I concentrations have not been established in association with the site for sample location AGFSED5 (Ref. 23, p. 28).

4.1.4.3.1.2 Level II Concentrations

At least 0.1 mile of wetland frontage occurs within the zone of actual contamination and is subject to Level II contamination using sediment samples alone (Ref. 1, Table 4-24).

Level II Concentrations Factor Value: 25HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 63 - MTD093291599 4.1.4.3.1.3. Potential Contamination

Sensitive Environments

No sensitive environment targets were eval uated for their potential target values.

Potential Contamination Factor Value: NS

4.1.4.3.1.4 Environmental Threat-Targets Factor Category Value

The environmental threat target factor category valu e for the watershed is the sum of the values for the Level I (0), Level II (25) and potential contamina tion factors (0) (Ref. 1, Section 4.1.4.3.1.4).

Environmental Threat-Target Factor Category Value = 25

4.1.4.4 Environmental Threat Score for Watershed

The environmental threat score is calculated by mu ltiplying the environmental threat factor category value for likelihood of release (550), the waste character istics (320) and targets for a watershed (25). The product is rounded to the nearest integer and divide d by 82,500. The resulting value, subject to a maximum of 60, is assigned as the Environmental Th reat Score for the Watershed (Ref. 1, Section 4.1.4.4).

Calculation:

550 X 320 X 25 = 4,400,000

4,400,000/82,500 = (subject to a maximum of 60) = 53.33

Environmental Threat Score: 53.33HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 64 - MTD093291599 5.0 SOIL EXPOSURE PATHWAY

5.0.1 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

Letter by which this area is to be identified: A

Name of area: Contaminated residential soil in Black Eagle, Montana

Residential soil contamination in the community of Black Eagle was documented by the EPA’s 2003, 2007, and 2008 investigations when elevated concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, and lead were found in one or more samples (Ref. 5, pp. 13-14; Ref. 18, pp. 28-30; Ref 21 pp. 10, 13-14).

The 2007 EPA CERCLA Site Assessment sampled residences on both the north and south sides of the Missouri River adjacent to the Anaconda Minerals Co, Great Falls Refinery (Ref. 21, p. 11). Of the eleven residences sampled in Great Falls on the south side of the Missouri River in August of 2007 only one residence had an elevated concentration of arsenic (Ref . 21, p. 13). Thirty-three residences were sampled for CLP analysis north of the Missouri River in Black Eagle in August of 2007, and arsenic and lead concentrations greater than three times background were identified in central and eastern Black Eagle from the results of the 2007 investigation (Ref. 21, pp. 13-14, 18). All soil samples collected were analyzed in the field using a portable XRF device (Ref. 5, p. 12; Ref. 21., p. 12). All samples for fixed laboratory analyses were analyzed through the EPA’s CLP, RAS. The sample s collected in 2007 were analyzed by A4 Scientific, Inc. of The Woodlands, Texas by EPA CLP method ILM05.4 (R ef. 60, p. 1; Ref. 61., p. 1; Ref. 62, p. 1).

The 2008 EPA CERCLA Expanded Site Investigation w as focused in the community of Black Eagle,

Montana. The residential soil at fift y-nine residential properties in Black Eagle was sampled in July 2008 to a depth of one foot (Ref. 5, p. 1). Concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, lead and zinc elevated three times background were detected in the residential soil in Black Eagle (Ref. 5, pp. 13-14; Ref. 18, pp. 28-30; Ref. 21, pp. 13-14). Elevated arsenic and cadmium resu lts delineated an area of contamination centered on southwestern and central Black Eagle (Ref. 5, pp. 13-14, 23-24).

All 2008 soil samples collected were analyzed in the field using a portable XRF device (Ref. 5, p. 12; Ref. 21., p. 12). All samples for fixed laboratory analyses were analyzed through the EPA’s Contract Laboratory Program (CLP), Routine Analytical Services. The sam ples collected in 2008 were analyzed by Chemtech Consulting Group, Mountainside, New Jersey by EPA CLP method ILM05.4 (Ref. 63. p. 1; Ref. 64, p. 1).

Background Concentrations:

A total of four background soil samples were collect ed in 2007 and 2008. Two background soil samples were collected in 2007 and two more background soil sampl es were collected in 2008. All four background samples were collected in populated areas west of the co mmunity of Black Eagle and on the north side of the Missouri River from sandy-silty soils formed on the Kootenai Formation (Ref. 5, p. 5, 10; Ref. 21, p. 4, 11; Ref. 10, 1 sheet; Ref. 36, book 2, p. 3 & book 3, pp. 17- 18; Ref. 52, pp. 15-16, 28; Ref. 49, 1 page). The background samples for both 2007 and 2008 were collected in the same manner as all the soil samples. Stainless steel hand augers, bow ls, and spoons were used for soil collecti on. Grab soil samples were collected from two horizons; zero to 2 inches and 6 to 12 inch es bgs. The non-disposable sampling equipment was decontaminated between sample locations. The samples were collected into a stainless steel bowl before being transferred into a 12X12 inch seal top poly bag or directly into 12X12-inch seal top poly bags labeled with the sample identifier. Sample descriptions we re logged on the field form with standard geologic descriptions along with a sketch map with dimensions of the property, description of the zone sampled, andHRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 65 - MTD093291599 any calculations supporting the decision. A photogra ph for report documentation was taken of each sample location showing the residence in the background of the photograph (Ref. 5, p. 11; Ref. 21, p. 11-12).

The highest value between the four background samples is used as the background value for this document (Ref. 48). Background sample R04ST2400F112 was collected on August 10, 2007 from Jaycee Park approximately 5,900 feet west of U.S. Highway 87 (Ref. 49, p. 1). The arsenic background of 17.2 mg/kg and the manganese background of 374 mg/kg were taken from this background sample location. Background sample R08ST2601F112 was collected on August 8, 2007 from the property of North Middle School approximately 3,000 feet west of U.S. Highway 87 (Ref . 21, p. 26; Ref. 49, p. 1). The cadmium background

of 0.67 mg/kg was taken from this background sample loca tion. Background sample R25AV0724FY02 was collected on July 11, 2008 from the front yard of the residence at 724 25 th Street, approximately 3,400 feet west of U.S. Highway 87 (Ref. 36, logbook # 2, p. 3; Ref. 5, p. 10; Ref. 49, p. 1 ). The lead background value

of 25.3 mg/kg and the background value for zinc of 108 mg/kg were taken from this background sample location. The fourth background sample location was collected on July 11, 2008 from the side yard of the

residence at 737 25 th Avenue, approximately 3,500 feet west of U.S. Highway 87 (Ref. 36, logbook # 2, p. 3; Ref. 5, p. 10; Ref. 49, p. 1).

The background values for arsenic, cadmium, and lead used to calculate elevated concentrations are included in the following table in bold:HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 66 - MTD093291599

*ACM Smelter and Refinery – Background Samples 0-2 inch horizon collected in 2007 and 2008 ( mg/kg) Analyte CRDL/ MDL(2007/2008) SCDM

Benchmark

RDSC Jaycee Park

R04ST2400F102

CLP - MHIH26 Sampled

8/10/2007 North Middle

School

R08ST2601F102

CLP - MH1H34 Sampled 8/8/2007 R25AV0724FY02

CLP - MH26P6 Sampled

7/11/2008 R25AV0737SY02

CLP - MH26P7 Sampled

7/11/2008

Arsenic 1/(0.49/0.37) 0.43 13.3 (10.4 J) 18.1 6.3 16.1

Cadmium 0.5/(0.20/0.040) 39 1.2 J+ 0.82 J+ 0.53 (0.34 J) 0.48

Lead 1/(0.49/0.25)

- 30.1 (17.5 J) 25.2 25.3 20.6

Reference Ref. 64, p. 51; Ref. 60, p. 64; Ref. 61, p. 64. Ref. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14,

BII-20 Ref. 21, p. 29; Ref. 51, pp. 117, 120, 124, 138; Ref. 52. p. 28; Ref. 60, pp. 1, 3, 6, 8, 18, 78, 363-365, 594, 599, 604; Ref. 21, p. 29; Ref. 51, pp. 2, 5, 9, 16; Ref. 52, pp. 15-16; Ref. 61, pp. 1, 3, 8, 9, 13, 219- 221, 560, 566, 570, Ref. 5, pp. 28-31, Appendix C, p. 55. Ref. 24, p. 2, Ref. 27, pp. 2,
3B, 3C, 3F, 3G, 3H, 9; Ref. 36, book 2, p. 3 & book 3, pp. 17- 18; Ref. 64. pp. 1, 4, 7, 9, 15, 79. Ref. 5, p. 28, & Appendix C, p. 55. Ref. 24, p. 2. Ref. 27, pp. 2, 3B, 3C, 3G, 3H, 10; Ref. 36, Book 2, p. 3, Book 3, pp. 17-18; Ref 64, pp. 1, 4, 7, 9, 16,

80.

* Sample IDs ending in 02 represent samples collected from 0-2 inches (Ref. 5, p. 10; Ref. 21, p. 11).

Bold Indicates background value sel ected for this document / mg/kg CRSC Cancer Risk Screening Concentration RDSC Reference Dose Screening Concentration J The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity and is the approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample. J+ The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity, but the result may be biased high. ( ) Validated value prior to adjustment as per EPA Fact Sheet “Using Qualified Data to Document an Observed Release and Observed Contamination” (Ref. 43, 18 pages). mg/kg milligrams per kilogram

**ACM Smelter and Refinery – Background Samples 6-12 inch horizon collected in 2007 ( mg/kg) Analyte CRDL/ MDL(2007) SCDM

Benchmark

RDSC Jaycee Park

R04ST2400F112

CLP - MHIH27 Sampled 8/10/2007 North Middle

School

R08ST2601F112

CLP - MH1H35 Sampled 8/8/2007 6-12 inch sample

not collected in

2008 6-12 inch sample

not collected in

2008

Arsenic 1/0.49 0.43 17.2 (13.3 J) 23.1

- - Cadmium 0.5/0.20 39 0.43 J+ 0.67 J+

- - Lead 1/0.49

- 10.6 (12.9 J) 18.6

- - Reference Ref. 60, p. 64; Ref. 61, p. 64 Ref. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14,

BII-20 Ref. 21, pp. 29- 32; Ref. 51, pp. 117, 120, 124, 139; Ref. 52. p. 28; Ref. 60, pp. 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 19, 117, 120, 124, 139, 366-368. Ref. 21, pp.29- 32; Ref. 51, pp. 2, 5, 9, 17; Ref. 52, pp. 15-16; Ref. 61, pp. 1, 3, 5, 8, 9, 14,

222-224 - -

** Sample IDs ending in 12 represent samples collected from 6-12 inches (Ref. 5, p. 10; Ref. 21, p. 11).

Bold Indicates background value sel ected for this document / mg/kg CRSC Cancer Risk Screening Concentration RDSC Reference Dose Screening ConcentrationHRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 67 - MTD093291599 J The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity and is the approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample. J+ The associated numerical value is an estimated quantity, but the result may be biased high. ( ) Validated value prior to adjustment as per EPA Fact Sheet “Using Qualified Data to Document an Observed Release and Observed Contamination” (Ref. 43, 18 pages). mg/kg milligrams per kilogram

Area of Observed Contamination

Surface Soil, <2 ft. bgs, all samples listed below show at least one concentration of arsenic, cadmium, or lead greater than 3 times background (Ref. 1, Table 2-3, p. 51589). All of the residential soil samples listed in the table were collected as grab samples from either the 0 to 2 or the 6 to 12 horizon below ground surface using stainless steel hand augers, bowls, and spoons to collect the sample. All non-disposable sampling equipment was decontaminated between sample locations. The sampl es were collected into a stainless steel bowl before being transferred into a 12X12 inch seal top poly bag or directly into 12X12-inch seal top poly bags labeled with the sample identifier. All samples were collected within 200 feet of the residence on the property (Ref. 5, p. 11; Ref. 21, p. 11-12). Qualified analytical data has been corrected as per the EPA Guidance “Using Qualified Data to Document an Observed Release a nd Observed Contamination” (Ref. 43, pp. 4 and 13).Sample IDSampleDateArsenic(As)(mg/kg)Cadmium(Cd)(mg/kg)Lead(Pb)(mg/kg)CRDL/MDL/SCDM(mg/kg)ReferencesR11ST0111FY02MH26N307/11/200873.23261As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5. Appendix C, p. 54. AppendixD, p. 1; Ref. 24, p. 1; Ref. 36, book 1,p. 5; Ref. 27, pp. 24, 27, 31, 32, 39;Ref. 63, pp. 1, 4, 7, 7A, 13, 62, 283.R12ST0106FY12MH26N407/11/200830.62.798.7As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5. Appendix C, p. 53. AppendixD, p.5; Ref. 24, p. 1; Ref. 27, pp. 24,27, 31, 32, 40; Ref. 36, book 1, p. 4;Ref. 63, pp. 1, 4, 7, 7A, 14, 62, 283.R12ST0121FY112MH26N507/11/200821513706As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 50-51.Appendix D, p.8; Ref. 24, p. 1; Ref.27, pp. 24, 27, 31, 41; Ref. 36, book3, p. 17; Ref. 63, p. 1, 4, 7, 7A, 15,62, 283.R13ST0112BY02MH26N607/10/200847.344.9562As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 45-47.Appendix D, p.9; Ref. 24, p. 1; Ref.27, pp. 24, 27, 31, 42; Ref. 36, book3, p. 12; Ref. 63, pp. 1, 4, 7, 7A, 16,62, 283.R13ST0117FY02MH26N707/11/200821.469.1439As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.50.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 7-8. AppendixD, p.10; Ref. 24, p. 1; ref. 27, pp. 24,27, 31, 32, 43; Ref. 36, book 1, p. 6-7; Ref. 63, pp. 1, 4, 7, 7A, 17, 62,143, 283.R13ST0121F112MH1H3808/11/2007(66.8 J)38.4(2.5 J+)1.8(754 J)523.6As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 30, Appendix C, p. 4,Appendix D, p.2; Ref. 51, pp. 2, 5, 8,HRS Documentation RecordACM Smelter and RefineryMarch 2011- 68 -MTD093291599Sample IDSampleDateArsenic(As)(mg/kg)Cadmium(Cd)(mg/kg)Lead(Pb)(mg/kg)CRDL/MDL/SCDM(mg/kg)References9, 10, 12, 20; Ref. 61, pp. 1, 3, 5, 8,9, 17, 64, 288-290.R13ST0123FY02MH26N907/12/200816.59.2432As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 7. AppendixD, p.14; Ref. 24, p. 1; Ref 27, 24, 27,31, 32, 45; Ref. 36, book 2, p. 5; Ref.63, pp. 1, 4, 7, 7A, 19, 62, 148, 283R13ST0127FY12MH26P007/12/200836.37.8340As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 8. AppendixD, p.15; Ref. 24, p. 1; Ref. 27, 24, 27,31, 32, 46; Ref. 36, book 2, p. 8; Ref.63, pp. 1, 4, 7, 7A, 20, 62, 149, 283.R14ST0122F102MH1H3908/11/2007(24.2 J)13.9111(607 J)421.5As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 29, Appendix C, p. 34,Appendix D, p. 3; Ref. 51, pp. 2, 5, 8,10, 12, 21; Ref. 52, p 34; Ref. 61, pp.1, 3, 5, 8, 9, 18, 291-293, 495-497R16ST0121BY12MH26P107/14/200867.814.5333As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.50.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 25. AppendixD, p.17; Ref. 24, p. 3; Ref. 27, pp. 2,3B, 3G, 3H, 4; Ref. 36, book 2, p. 14;Ref. 61, pp. 1, 4, 7, 9, 10, 64, 74,182, 184.R15ST0215B102MH1H4008/08/2007(18 J)10.311.6(553 J)384.0As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 29, Appendix C, p. 5,Appendix D, p. 4; Ref. 51, pp. 2, 5,10, 12, 22; Ref. 61, pp. 1, 3, 5, 8, 9,19, 64, 294-296R15ST0307F112MH1H4108/08/2007(39.8 J)22.9(2.2 J +)1.6(789 J)547.9As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 30, Appendix C, p. 5,Appendix D, p. 5; Ref. 51, pp. 2, 5, 8,HRS Documentation RecordACM Smelter and RefineryMarch 2011- 69 -MTD093291599Sample IDSampleDateArsenic(As)(mg/kg)Cadmium(Cd)(mg/kg)Lead(Pb)(mg/kg)CRDL/MDL/SCDM(mg/kg)References9, 10, 12, 23; Ref. 61, pp. 1, 3, 5, 8,9, 20, 64, 297-299, 381-383,R16ST0128F112MH1H4308/11/2007(34.5 J)19.8(2.3 J+)1.6163As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 30, Appendix C, p. 6,Appendix D, p. 7; Ref. 51, pp. 46, 49,52, 53, 54, 56, 60; Ref. 62, 1, 3, 8, 9,13, 64, 112-114.R17ST0122F112MH1H4408/11/2007(60.1 J)34.5(27 J)19.2967As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 30, Appendix C, p. 7,Appendix D, p. 8; Ref. 51, pp. 46, 49,54, 56, 61; Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3, 8, 9, 14,64, 115-117, 432-434.R17ST0125F112MH1H4508/12/2007(43.5 J)25(6.9 J)4.9162As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 30, Appendix C, p. 7,Appendix D, p. 9; Ref. 51, pp. 46, 49,54, 56, 62; Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3, 8, 9, 15,64, 118-120.R20ST0118BY12MH26P307/10/200822.89.4319As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 47. AppendixD, p.22; Ref. 24, p. 2; Ref. 27, pp. 2,3B, 3F, 3G, 3H, 6; Ref. 36, book 3, p.14; Ref. 64, pp. 1, 4, 7, 9, 12, 51, 76,180, 182R21ST0328FY12MH26P407/15/200872.42.586.2As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 37. AppendixD, p.25; Ref. 24, p. 2; Ref. 27, 2, 3B,3C, 3F, 3G, 3H, 7; Ref. 36, book 2, p.18; Ref. 64, pp. 1, 4, 7, 9,13, 51, 77,180, 182.R21ST0520FY12MH26P507/15/200847.52.690.1As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Ref. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 35. AppendixHRS Documentation RecordACM Smelter and RefineryMarch 2011- 70 -MTD093291599Sample IDSampleDateArsenic(As)(mg/kg)Cadmium(Cd)(mg/kg)Lead(Pb)(mg/kg)CRDL/MDL/SCDM(mg/kg)ReferencesPb = 1/0.25/NAD, p.30; Ref. 24, p. 2; Ref. 27, pp. 2,3B, 3C, 3F, 3G, 3H, 8; Ref. 36, book2, p. 19; Ref. 64, p. 1, 4, 7, 9, 14, 51,78, 92.R21ST0625F112MH1H4708/10/200743.62.7124As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 30, Appendix C, p. 37,Appendix D, p. 13; Ref. 51, pp. 118,120, 125, 126, 147; Ref 52, p. 26;Ref. 60, pp. 1, 3, 6, 10, 27, 64, 456-458.R21ST0641S112MH1H4808/10/200738.42.8199As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 30, Appendix C, p. 9,Appendix D, p. 14; Ref. 51, pp. 118,120, 125, 126, 148; Ref. 60, pp. 1, 3,6, 10, 28, 64, 459-461.R22ST0114B112MH1H5008/09/200784.427.3397As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 31 , Appendix C, p. 10,Appendix D, p. 15; Ref. 51, pp. 118,120, 125, 150; Ref. 60, pp. 2, 3, 6,10, 30, 64, 465-467.R22ST0118F102MH1H5208/09/2007(22.4 J)12.925.8(519 J)399.2As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 29, Appendix C, p.11,Appendix D, p. 16; Ref. 51, pp. 2, 5,8, 10, 12, 26; Ref. 61, pp. 1, 3, 5, 8,10, 23, 64, 315-317, 390-395R22ST0613B112MH1H5408/10/2007(39.8 J)22.97.8(272 J)209.2As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 31, Appendix C, p. 38,Appendix D, p. 20; Ref. 51, pp. 2, 5,8, 10, 12, 28; Ref. 52, p. 29; Ref. 61,pp. 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 26, 64, 321-323,420-422HRS Documentation RecordACM Smelter and RefineryMarch 2011- 71 -MTD093291599Sample IDSampleDateArsenic(As)(mg/kg)Cadmium(Cd)(mg/kg)Lead(Pb)(mg/kg)CRDL/MDL/SCDM(mg/kg)ReferencesR22ST0633B112MH1H5508/10/2007(53.1 J)33.22.9(290 J)223.1As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 31, Appendix C, p. 16,Appendix D, p. 22; Ref. 51, pp. 2, 5,8, 10, 12, 29; Ref. 61, pp.1, 3, 5, 8,11, 26, 64, 324-326, 423-425R22ST0641B112MH217408/09/2007(88.8 J)55.53.6(223 J)171.5As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 31, Appendix C, p. 17,Appendix D, p. 23; Ref. 51, pp. 3, 5,8, 10, 12, 30; Ref. 61, pp. 1, 3, 5, 8,11, 27, 64, 327-329, 426-428RCHAV1820BY12MH26Q007/13/200850.92.789.4As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, pp. 29, 65, Appendix C, pp.23-24, Appendix D, p. 34, Ref. 27,pp. 2, 3B, 3C, 3F, 3G, 3H, 13; Ref.64, pp. 1, 4, 7, 9, 19, 51, 85, 182,185, 189.RCOAV1508S112MH217608/10/2007(53.1 J)33.2(3 J+)2.1179As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 31, Appendix C, p.18,Appendix D, p. 26; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 52, 53, 54, 56, 63; Ref. 62, pp. 1,3, 8, 10, 16, 64, 121-123, 435-437RCOAV1702BY12MH26Q207/12/200829.31.676.7As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 11. AppendixD, p.37; Ref. 24, p. 4; Ref. 27, pp. 2,3B, 3C, 3F, 3G, 3H, 15; Ref. 36,book 2, p. 5; Ref. 64, p. 1, 4, 7, 8, 21,51, 87.RCOAV1711B102MH217708/10/2007(23.9 J)13.7(3.9 J)2.894.6As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 29, Appendix C, p. 20,Appendix D, p. 29; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 52, 54, 56, 64; Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3,HRS Documentation RecordACM Smelter and RefineryMarch 2011- 72 -MTD093291599Sample IDSampleDateArsenic(As)(mg/kg)Cadmium(Cd)(mg/kg)Lead(Pb)(mg/kg)CRDL/MDL/SCDM(mg/kg)References8, 10, 17, 64, 124-126.RCOAV1903B112MH217908/10/2007(63.8 J)39.9(13.2 J)9.4866As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 31, Appendix C, p. 21,Appendix D, p. 31; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 52, 54, 56, 65; Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3,8, 10, 18, 64, 127-129, 438-440RCOAV1904B112MH218008/09/2007(32.9 J)18.9(5.5 J)3.9224As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 31, Appendix C, p. 43,Appendix D, p. 32; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 52, 54, 56, 66. Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3,8, 10, 19, 64, 130-132, 441-443RCOAV1906B112MH218108/09/2007(35.7 J)20.5(6.9 J)4.9216As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 32, Appendix C, p. 45,Appendix D, p. 33; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 54, 56, 67; Ref. 52, pp. 22-23;Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3, 8, 11, 20, 64, 462-464RCOAV1909BY02MH26Q307/13/200829.313.1394As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 14. AppendixD, p.39; Ref. 24, p. 3; Ref. 27, pp. 2,3B, 3F, 3G, 3H, 16; Ref. 36, book 2,p. 7; Ref. 64 pp. 1, 4, 7, 8, 22, 51, 88.RCOAV1917VG02MH218208/09/2007(6.8 J)3.9(3.8 J+)2.7119As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 21, p. 29, Appendix C, p. 22,Appendix D, p. 36; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 52, 53, 54, 56, 68; Ref. 62, pp. 1,3, 8, 11, 21, 64, 153-155, 559,RCOAV1922B112MH218308/09/2007(27.6 J)15.9(1.8 J+)1.368.7As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 32, Appendix C, p. 46,Appendix D, p. 37; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 53, 69; Ref. 52, p. 20; Ref. 62, pp.1, 3, 8, 11, 22, 64, 75, 156-158, 567,HRS Documentation RecordACM Smelter and RefineryMarch 2011- 73 -MTD093291599Sample IDSampleDateArsenic(As)(mg/kg)Cadmium(Cd)(mg/kg)Lead(Pb)(mg/kg)CRDL/MDL/SCDM(mg/kg)References568, 573.RCOAV1923F112MH218408/11/200735.33.8152As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 32, Appendix C, p. 47,Appendix D, p. 38; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 52, 53, 54, 56, 70; Ref. 52, p. 31;Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3, 8, 11, 23, 64, 177-179, 560.RCOAV1925F112MH218508/12/2007(29.3 J)16.8(2.6 J+)1.8141As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 32, Appendix C, p. 23,Appendix D, p. 39; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 52, 53, 54, 56, 71; Ref. 62, pp.1,3, 8, 11, 24, 64, 180-182.RMTAV1518FY02MH26Q507/15/200816.324.6334As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 68. AppendixD, p.41; Ref. 24, p. 3; Ref. 27, pp. 3,3B, 3F, 3G, 3H, 18; Ref. 64, pp. 1, 4,7, 8, 24, 51, 89, 104.RMTAV1708VG12MH26Q707/14/200867.31.275.8As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.50.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 43-44,Appendix D, p. 44; Ref. 24, p. 4; Ref.27, pp. 3, 3B, 3C, 3F, 3G, 3H, 20;20; Ref. 36, bk. 3, p. 11; Ref. 64, pp.1, 4, 7, 8, 26, 51, 100.RMTAV1716BY12MH26Q807/09/2008911536As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 41. AppendixD, p.46; Ref. 24, p. 3; Ref. 27, pp. 3,3B, 3F, 3G, 3H, 21; Ref. 36, book 3,p. 8; Ref. 64 p. 27, 51, 186, 189.RMTAV1722FY02MH26R007/10/200830.33.8147As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 43. AppendixD, p.48; Ref. 24, p. 3; Ref. 27, pp. 3,HRS Documentation RecordACM Smelter and RefineryMarch 2011- 74 -MTD093291599Sample IDSampleDateArsenic(As)(mg/kg)Cadmium(Cd)(mg/kg)Lead(Pb)(mg/kg)CRDL/MDL/SCDM(mg/kg)References3B, 3C, 3F, 3H, 29; Ref. 64, pp. 1, 4,7, 8, 29, 51, 103.182, 187.RMTAV1901FY12MH26R107/10/200843.42.9148As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix D, p.50; Ref. 24, p.3; Ref. 27. pp. 24, 27, 31, 32, 21; Ref.63, pp. 1, 4, 7B, 21, 51, 62, 124, 285,290, 295.RMTAV1908F112MH218608/09/2007(50.4 J)29(2.8 J+)2119As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 32, Appendix C, p. 48,Appendix D, p. 40; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 52, 53, 54, 56, 72; Ref. 52, p21;Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3, 8, 11, 25, 64, 183-185.RMTAV1912F102MH218708/09/2007(14.4 J)8.3(4.8 J)3.4331As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 29, Appendix C, p. 49,Appendix D, p. 41; Ref. 51, pp. 46,49, 52, 54, 56,73; Ref. 52, pp. 21-22;Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3, 5, 11, 26, 64, 186-188.RMTAV1915BY12MH26R307/13/2008750.526.7As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 20, AppendixD, p. 52; Ref. 24, p. 5; Ref. 27, pp.24, 27, 31, 32, 49; Ref. 36, bk. 2, p.11; Ref. 63, pp. 1, 4, 7B, 23, 51, 62,128.RMTAV1924B112MH218908/10/2007(55.5 J)34.7(3.6 J+)2.6112As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 32, Appendix C, p. 50,Appendix D, p. 42; Ref. 51, pp. 47,49, 52, 53, 54, 56, 75; Ref. 52, pp.25-26; Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3, 5, 11, 28,192-194.HRS Documentation RecordACM Smelter and RefineryMarch 2011- 75 -MTD093291599Sample IDSampleDateArsenic(As)(mg/kg)Cadmium(Cd)(mg/kg)Lead(Pb)(mg/kg)CRDL/MDL/SCDM(mg/kg)ReferencesRRBDR2720F102MH219008/11/2007(71.9 J)44.9(4.2 J)3141As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 29, Appendix C, p. 51,Appendix D, p. 43; Ref. 51, pp47, 49,52, 54, 56, 76; Ref. 62, pp.1, 3, 5, 11,29, 64, 195-197.RRVAV2118B112MH219108/10/2007(85.2 J)53.3(4.7 J)3.31,650As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 32, Appendix D, p. 44;Ref. 51, pp. 47, 49, 52, 54, 56, 77;Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3, 5, 12, 30, 64, 198-200, 465-467.RSMAV1605B112MH219208/11/2007(45.1 J)25.9(3.2 J+)2.3137As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 32, Appendix D, p. 45;Ref. 51, pp. 47, 49, 52, 53, 54, 56,78; Ref. 62, pp.1, 3, 5, 12, 31, 64,201-203, 486-488.RSMAV1624B112MH219308/11/2007(72.6 J)45.4(2.7 J+)1.9280As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 32, Appendix D, p. 46;Ref. 51, pp. 47, 49, 52, 53, 54, 56,79.Ref. 62, pp. 1, 3, 5, 12, 32, 64,213-215.RSMAV1917FY12MH26R507/14/200842.73.8167As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5. Appendix C, p. 28-29.Appendix D, p.56; Ref. 24, p. 5; Ref.27, pp. 24, 27, 31, 32, 51; Ref. 36,book 2, p. 15; Ref. 63, pp. 1, 4, 7, 7B,25, 62, 135.RSMAV2021SY12MH26R607/14/200853.113.5351As = 1/0.37/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.040/39Pb = 1/0.25/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 5. Appendix C, p. 67. AppendixD, p.57; Ref. 24, p. 4; Ref. 27, pp. 24,27, 31, 32, 52; Ref. 63, pp. 1, 4, 7,7B, 26, 51, 136.HRS Documentation RecordACM Smelter and RefineryMarch 2011- 76 -MTD093291599HRS Documentation RecordACM Smelter and RefineryMarch 2011- 77 -MTD093291599Sample IDSampleDateArsenic(As)(mg/kg)Cadmium(Cd)(mg/kg)Lead(Pb)(mg/kg)CRDL/MDL/SCDM(mg/kg)ReferencesRSMAV2233F102MH219408/12/2007(15 J)8.66.7(131 J)100.8As = 1/0.49/0.43Cd = 0.5/0.20/39Pb = 1/0.49/NARef. 2, pp. BII-13, BII-14, BII-20;Ref. 21, p. 29, Appendix C, p. 59,Appendix D, p. 49; Ref. 51, pp. 3, 5,8, 10, 12, 33; Ref. 61, pp. 1, 3, 5, 8,12, 30, 64, 354-356.J The analyte was positively identified; theassociated numerical value is the approximate concentration of the analyte in thesample.J+ The analyte was positively identified; theassociated numerical value is the approximate concentration of the analyte in thesample, but is biased high.( ) Value prior to correction as per EPA guidance 9285-7-14FS “Using Qualified Data to Documentan Observed Release and Observed Contamination” (Ref.43, pp. 2 and 13).HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 78 - MTD093291599 Attribution

In August of 2007 residential soil samples from the 0-2 inches below gr ound surf ace and the 6-12 inch below ground surface horizons were collected by START from 33 residential properties in Black Eagle, Montana (Ref. 21, pp. 13-14, 18).

In July 2008, residential soil samples from the 0-2 inches below ground surface and the 6-12 inch below ground surface horizons were collected by START from 59 re sidential properties in Black Eagle, Montana. A minimum of four soil samples were collected from each residential property. An additional 20 soil samples were collected from the public playground and baseball fields located on the south side of Black Eagle, Montana (Ref. 5, p. 1, 10). All soil samples were analyzed in the field using an X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (XRF) (Ref 5, p. 1). Thirty-nine soil sam ples were selected after reviewing the field XRF data and were submitted to a Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) laboratory for collaborative analysis. A total of 60 soil samples, from both Great Falls and Black Eagl e, in 2007 and thirty-nine soil samples from Black Eagle in 2008 were sent for collaborative analysis by anal ytical method EPA CLP ILM05.4 (Ref. 5, p. 1; Ref. 21, p.1; Ref. 60, p. 1; Ref. 61, p. 1, Ref., 62, p. 1, Ref. 63, p. 1, Ref. 64, p. 1).

Hazardous substances associated with the air emissions emanating from Source 3, facility air emissions, were

also associated with the residen tial soil contamination in Black Eagle. (See sections 5.0.1, General Considerations, and 2.2.1, Source Identification (Source 3) , of this HRS documentation record). Arsenic was detected in air emissions from Source 3 (facility air emissi ons). (Ref. 33) Also, larg e quantities of flue dust, a by-product of smelting operation emissions, was generated at the facility—which was documented to contain arsenic, lead, and cadmium (Ref. 58, pg. 13-14, Table 4- 6) Aerial deposition of contaminants emanating from Source 3, facility air emissions, is the most likely mech anism of contaminant transport to the community of Black Eagle’s residential soils (Ref. 8, p. 6A; Ref. 9, p. 15). The 506 foot tall Big Stack was designed to eject a volume of 1,575,000 cubic feet of air per minute at a velocity of 450 feet per minute, a sufficient volume

and rate to entrain and remove from the smelter a ll the gases and dust generated during the smelting process (Ref. 9, p. 20). ). An internal Anaconda Copper Company Memorandum from 1951 stated that approximately 15.04 pounds of arsenic passed out of the stack every 24 hours (Ref. 33, p. 1).

The wind direction in the Great Falls, Montana area is us ually from the southwest, particularly in the months of October through March. Wind data collected at th e Great Falls International Airport, approximately 5 miles southwest of the community of Black Eagle show s that during March, April, and May the winds can blow from the northwest or northeast more than twenty percent of the time and that in the summer months of June, July, and August wind direction over Black Eagle is from the northeast or east more than 20 percent of

the time (Ref. 30, pp. 2-13). A south facing aerial photo publis hed by the Great Falls Tribune in 2002 shows smoke from the 506 foot tall stack wafting westward across the community of Black Eagle (Ref. 29, p. 8A).

The former Montana Silver Smelter site is located on the south bank of the Missouri River in Giant Springs State Park, approximately 2.85 miles east-northeast of the 15 th Street Bridge (Ref. 4, 2 pages). The Montana Silver Smelter was constructed in 1888 by Great Falls city father, Paris Gibson (Ref. 56, p. 2). The smelter had two small stacks. Many of the structures at Gi ant Springs State Park and Giant Springs State Fish Hatchery were built on mineral processing wastes that cont ained extremely high levels of arsenic and lead. This property was cleaned up by the Montana Mi ne Waste Cleanup Bureau’s Abandoned Mine Lands Program in 2004 (Ref. 57, pp. 9-11).

The Montana Refining Company is located immediatel y west of the unincorporated community of Black Eagle on the north bank of the Missouri River at 1900 10 th Street, NE, Great Falls, Montana (Ref. 50). The Montana Refining Company produces various grades of g asoline, diesel, jet fuel, distillates, and high grade asphalt products (Ref. 65, 1 page.). The facility has an operable capacity of 9,500 barrels per calendar day ranking the facility as number 132 of the 143 U.S. Refineries (Ref. 66, p. 4).HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 79 - MTD093291599 The former Montana Silver Smelter and the Montana Refining Company may have contributed contamination to the community. However, as documented above, the ACM Smelter and Refinery facility also contributed contamination; therefore, the contamination in Black Ea gle is at least partially attributable to ACM Smelter and Refinery.

Area of Contamination Hazardous Waste Quantity

- Hazardous Constituent Quantity: Are the data complete for Hazardous c onstituent quantity for this area? NO

Hazardous Constituent Quantity Assigned Value: NA

- Hazardous Wastestream Quantity: Are the data complete for Hazardous Wastestream quantity for this area? NO

Sum (pounds): NA Wastestream Quantity/5,000 (Ref. 1, Table 5-2): NA

Hazardous Wastestream Quantity Assigned Value: NA

- Volume: Are the data complete for Hazardous volume for this area? NO

Sum (yd 3 /gal): NA Equation for Assigning Value (Ref. 1, Table 5-2): NA Volume Assigned Value: 0

- Area: A

Description

Arsenic and cadmium results from soil samples coll ected in the summers of 2007 and 2008 that are

documented to be at Level I concentrations on Black Eagle residential soils. Some samples taken between these contaminated soil samples exhibit levels of c ontamination not significantly greater than background concentrations. (Ref. 22, pg. 2) As such, the area betw een the contaminated soil samples is not inferred to be contaminated, and the exact area of the area of observed contamination is unknown but greater than 0. (Ref. 1, Sections 5.0.1, 2.5.1, 2.5.2, 5.1.3.1)

Calculation

By following the stated procedure outlined in Sections 2. 4.2 and 5.1.2.2 and Table 5-2 of the HRS (Ref. 1, p. 51647, Table 5.2), the area value is assigned as follows: > 0 / 34,000= > 0

Area Assigned Value: > 0

5.1 RESIDENT POPULATION THREATHRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 80 - MTD093291599 Observed contamination samples were selected fro m the Analytical Results Reports for the 2007 CERCLA Site Assessment and from the 2008 Expanded Site Investigation to establish laboratory verified concentrations of arsenic lead, and cadmium, as well as sample ID, street address, property owner, and the date each sample was collected (Ref. 21, pp. 29-32; Ref. 5, pp. 28-31). All samples listed in Section 5.0.1

of this HRS documentation record were collected within 200 feet of the residence (Ref. 21, p. 1; Ref. 5, pp. 4 and 5). Analysis of sample R12ST0121FY12 (MH26N5) collected on July 11, 2008, with an arsenic concentration of 215 mg/kg, a cadmium concen tration of 13 mg/kg, and a lead concentration of 706 mg/kg in surface soils from a collection depth < 2 feet bgs documents the resident population threat (Ref. 5, Appendix C, p. 49. Appendix D, p.8; Ref. 24, p. 1; Ref. 36, book 3, p. 17; Ref. 63 p. 15)

5.1.1 LIKELIHOOD OF EXPOSURE

The presence of arsenic, cadmium, and lead contamina tion in concentrations meeting observed contamination requirements on residential property within 200 feet of the primary dwelling establishes a resident population threat for the site (Ref.1, Section 5.1, p. 51646). The location of each sample was noted on the property sketch of the Residential Soil Sampling Log, which docum ents that all samples were collected on the property and within 200 feet of the residence (Ref. 5, Appendi x D; Ref. 21, Appendix D). In addition a digital download of a property plat was obtained from the Cascade County uniquely identifying each parcel of property (Ref. 37, p. 1).

Resident Population Threat Likelihood of Exposure Factor Category Value: 550

5.1.2 WASTE CHARACTERISTICS

5.1.2.1 Toxicity

Hazardous Substance Toxicity Factor Value Reference

Arsenic, Cadmium, and Lead 10,000 Ref. 2, pp. BI-1, BI-2, BI-8

Toxicity Factor Value: 10,000

5.1.2.2 Hazardous Waste Quantity

Because Level I contamination has been documented, but the hazardous constituent quantity is not adequately

determined for the area of observed contamination th e final assigned waste quantity factor value is 10 (see Section 5.0.1 of this HRS documentation record; Re f. 1, Section 2.4.2.2 p. 51592, Section 2.4.2.2). Area Assigned Value: 1

Area Letter Source Type AOC Hazardous Waste Quantity

A Contaminated Soil > 0

The value of > 0 corresponds to a value of 1 from HRS Table 2-6. However, as the hazardous constituent quantity is not adequately determined, a value of 10 is assigned for this AOC as per HRS, Section 2.4.2.2 (Ref. 1, Section 2.4.2.2).HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 81 - MTD093291599 Hazardous Waste Quantity Factor Value: 10 (Ref. 1, Section 2.4.2.2)

5.1.2.3 Calculation of Waste Characteristics Factor Category Value

Toxicity Factor Value: 10,000 Hazardous Waste Quantity Factor Value: 10

Toxicity Factor Value x Hazardous Waste Quantity Factor Value: 100,000

Waste Characteristics Factor Category Value: 18 (Ref. 1, p. 51592, Table 2-7)

5.1.3 TARGETS

5.1.3.1 Resident Individual

Level of Contamination (Level I/Level II): Level I

There are 8 residential soil samples that exhibit Leve l I arsenic or cadmium contamination within the unincorporated community of Black Eagle, Montana (see Section 5.0.1 of this HRS documentation record). These samples delineate an area of observed soil contam ination and document the presence of Level I soil contamination at each of the eight residences. All r esidences within the area of observed soil contamination are subject to actual contamination. These samples were all collected on the resident individual’s property and within 200 linear feet of the residence; therefore a resident individual factor of 50 is assigned (Ref. 5, pp. 4 & 5). (Ref.1, Section 5.1.3.1, p. 51647; 8; Ref. 5, p.10, Appendix D, p. 8)

Resident Individual Factor Value: 50

5.1.3.2 Resident Population

5.1.3.2.1 Level I Concentrations

Area Letter Sample ID Number of

Residences County Multiplier No. of

Residents

A See Section 5.0.1 of this

HRS documentation record 8 2.41 19.28

Sum of individuals subject to Level I concentrations: 19.28 Sum of individuals subject to Le vel I concentrations x 10: 192.8

Analysis from residential surface soil samples collected from the community of Black Eagle indicate the presence of arsenic and/or cadmium at levels thr ee times the background concentration or greater, and exceeding the applicable health based benchmark at 8 residences (Ref. 2, pp. BII-I and BII-2). U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census data (Ref. 28, p. 1) indicates that there is an average of 2.41 individuals per residence in Cascade County, Montana. Eight residences, with an average of 2.41 residents per household, result in a total of 19.28 individuals subj ect to Level I arsenic or cadmium concentrations. Since these individuals are subject to Level I contamina tion, the appropriate factor value is determined by summing the individuals subject to Level I contamination and multiplying by 10 (Ref. 1, Section 5.1.3.2.1, p. 51647) yielding a total factor value of 192.8HRS Documentation Record ACM Smelter and Refinery

March 2011 - 82 - MTD093291599 Level I Concentrations Factor Value: 192.8

5.1.3.2.2 Level II Concentrations

Besides the eight residences have documented Level I contamination within 200 feet of the residence, 45 residences are exposed to Level II contamination (Ref. 37, p. 1). Forty-five residences with a county average of 2.41 individuals per residence results in 108.45 people being exposed to Level II Concentrations (Figure 2; Ref. 28, p. 1)

Sum of individuals subject to Level II contaminations: 108.45

Level II Concentrations Factor Value: 108.45

5.1.3.3 Workers

Total workers were not scored (NS)

Workers Factor Value: NS

5.1.3.4 Resources

Resource Description: There is no commercial agricu lture, silviculture, or commercial livestock production or grazing within the area of observed contamination.

Resources Factor Value: 0

5.1.3.5 Terrestrial Sensitive Environments

Sensitive Environment Description: There are no terrest rial sensitive environments identified within the area

of observed contamination.

Terrestrial Sensitive Environments Factor Value: 0

5.2 NEARBY POPULATION THREAT

Nearby population threat was not scored

Nearby Population Threat Factor Value: NS