alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 01-14-00861-CR

In the 

Court of Appeals 

For the 

First District of Texas 

At Houston 



No. 1388920 

In the 184th District Court of 

Harris County, Texas 



SEGISMUNDO GONZALEZ

Appellant 

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS 

Appellee 



STATE’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

IN WHICH TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF 



TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS:

 COMES NOW THE STATE OF TEXAS, in accordance with Rules 10.5(b)(1) 

and 38.6(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and files this motion for 

extension of time in which to file the State’s brief in these cases, and, in support 

thereof, presents the following: 

1. In the 184th district court of Harris County, Texas, cause 1388920, the State of 

Texas v. Segismundo Gonzalez, appellant, was convicted of theft. 

2. He was assessed punishment of confinement for 17 years in the Institutional 

Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. 

ACCEPTED

01-14-00861-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/8/2015 5:56:03 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 5:56:03 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
3. The State’s brief was due on April 3, 2015.

4. An extension of time in which to file the State’s brief is requested until 

March 18, 2015.

5. No previous extensions have been requested by the State.

6. The facts relied upon to explain the need for this extension are:

Since appellant filed his brief, I have filed briefs in cause numbers 14-14-

00204-CR and 14-14-00777-CR. In addition to the present case, I have 3 briefs 

assigned to me, am recreating exhibits for an abatement hearing in cause

number 14-13-00767-CR, and am preparing for trial on May 4th, 2015 on the 

State of Texas v. Sidney Darrell in cause number 1421932. Additionally, I assist 

trial court prosecutors with legal questions on a daily basis. This motion is not 

sought for delay, but so that justice may be done.

WHEREFORE, the State prays that this Court will grant an extension of time 

until March 9, 2015 in which to file the State’s brief in this case.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Abbie Miles

Abbie Miles

Assistant District Attorney

Harris County, Texas

1201 Franklin, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 755-5826

TBC No. 24072240
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing instrument has been mailed to the 

appellant’s attorney at the following address on April 8, 2015:

Leah M. Borg

874 Yorkchester No. 123

Houston, TX 77079

Borg579@att.net

/s/ Abbie Miles

Abbie Miles

Assistant District Attorney

Harris County, Texas

Date: April 8, 2015
IIA 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 76 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 21, 2020 

Received 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of 

title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by 

the Department of Education relating to ‘‘Borrower Defense Institutional Accountability’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HJ 76 RDS 

1 Department of Education relating to ‘‘Borrower Defense 

2 Institutional Accountability’’ (84 Fed. Reg. 49788 (Sep3 tember 23, 2019)), and such rule shall have no force or 

4 effect. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 16, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Tom Stephens, *Plaintiff in Error,*v. The State of Florida, *Defendant in Error.*

I.. A criminal case, made up under the rules for civil cases, is governed by those rules, and the sufficiency of the evidence will not be considered in the absence of a certificate of the trial judge that the bill of exceptions contains all the evidence

2. To review rejected instructions in a criminal case certified under the rules for civil causes, it is essential that all the charges given appear in the transcript.

This case was decided by Division A.

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Gadsden County.

The facts in this case are stated in the opinion of the court.

*Davidson*and *Buford,*for plaintiff in error;

*W. H. Ellis,*Attorney General for the state.

Cockrell, J.

— Tom Stephens was convicted in the circuit court for Gadsden county of the crime of larceny of domestic animals and sentenced to the state’s prison *108for a term of two years. Upon writ of error thereto he assigns error upon the sufficiency of the evidence and the refusal of the court to give two requested instructions.

The transcript presented to this court has been made up and certified under the rules pertaining- to civil causes under the option allowed the plaintiff in erro.r in criminal causes and having so elected he must be held to.a compliance with those rules as it is not permissible to confuse the two methods in the same transcript. See Clinton v. State, 53 Fla. 98, 43 South. Rep. 312.

The rule as to civil causes provides succinctly that if the bill of exceptions contains all the evidence the judge shall so certify in the bill and “in the absence of such certificate the bill will be treated and taken as one not embracing all the evidence.” There is no such certificate before us and we are not therefore called upon to pronounce upon the sufficiency of the evidence.

This rule also provides that if “error be predicated upon charges given or refused all the charges given at the trial shall be inserted in the bill of exceptions.” The reason for the rule is obvious; as to a charge given its imperfection may be absolutely cured by other charges and as to charges refused, the refusal may have been based upon the desire to avoid repetition. In any event it is the duty of the plaintiff in error to make . error plainly to appear and in the manner provided by the lawful rules promulgated to that end.

The record does not purport to contain any charge, much less all the charges given at the trial and we therefore decline to review those rejected.

Practically all that we here say has been settled by us in the opinion filed at this term in. the case of Allbritton v. State.

It follows that the judgment is affirmed.

*109Shackleford, C. J., and Whitfield, J., concur;

Tyalor, Hocker and Parkhill, JJ., concur in the opinion.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**SENECA GAMING CORPORATIONCERTIFICATION OF CORPORATE OFFICERS**

(Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Seneca Gaming Corporation,or SGC, on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission, we, Brian Hansberry, Interim Presidentand Chief Executive Officer, and Patrick M. Fox, Chief Financial Officer,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       The Quarterly Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.                                       The information contained in the QuarterlyReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operation of SGC as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form10-Q.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to SGC and will be retained by SGC and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.

May 15, 2007
| /s/ E. Brian Hansberry                         |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|
| E. Brian  Hansberry                            |   |
| Interim  President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)                 |   |
|                                           |   |
|                                           |   |
| /s/ Patrick M.  Fox                            |   |
| Patrick M. Fox                                 |   |
| Chief Financial  Officer                       |   |
| (Principal  Financial Officer)                 |   |

 

The forgoingcertification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant toItem 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is notincorporated by reference into any filing of SGC, whether made before or afterthe date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in suchfiling.

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 76 (Thursday, April 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9263]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

[4502-4025-720]

Boundary Revision of Valley Forge National Historical Park

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Announcement of boundary revision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the revision to the boundary of Valley 
Forge National Historical Park, pursuant to the authority specified 
below, to include adjacent and contiguous parcels of land in Montgomery 
County, Pennsylvania, totaling 0.73 of an acre. These parcels are 
depicted on Legislative Boundary Map Number 464/108056, entitled 
``Valley Forge National Historical Park Proposed Boundary Expansion, 
Montgomery County, Pennsylvania,'' dated June 27, 2011. This map is on 
file and available for inspection at the following locations: National 
Park Service, Land Resources, Northeast Region, 200 Chestnut Street, 
Room 324, Philadelphia, PA 19106, and National Park Service, Department 
of the Interior, Washington, DC 20240.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Act of July 4, 1976 (Pub. L. 94-337, 90 
Stat. 796) provides that, after notifying the House Committee on 
Natural Resources and the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources, the Secretary of the Interior may make minor revisions of 
the boundaries of the park when necessary by publication of a revised 
map or other boundary description in the Federal Register. The 
Committees have been notified as required. This action will add parcels 
of land containing a total of 0.73 of an acre to Valley Forge National 
Historical Park. The National Park Service proposes to acquire these 
parcels by donation from the individual tract owners, who have 
consented to the acquisition.

DATES: The effective date of this boundary revision is April 19, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent, Valley Forge National 
Historical Park, 1400 North Outer Line Drive, King Prussia, PA 19406, 
(610) 783-1037.

    Dated: March 22, 2012.
Dennis R. Reidenbach,
Regional Director, Northeast Region.
[FR Doc. 2012-9263 Filed 4-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DJ-P
```
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 107 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 

2021, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2021 (division 

4 A of Public Law 116–159) is further amended by striking 
2 

•HJ 107 EH 

1 the date specified in section 106(3) and inserting ‘‘Decem2 ber 20, 2020’’. 

3 This joint resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Further 

4 Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2021’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 18, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 107 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal 

year 2021, and for other purposes.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 7, 2020

Order 

Clerk

January 7, 2020

160503(55)(56)

CINDY SCHAAF, COLLEEN M. FRYER, and

GWEN MASON,

Plaintiffs/CounterdefendantsAppellants,

SC: 160503

v COA: 343630

Antrim CC: 2016-009008-CH

CHARLENE FORBES, also known as ANGIE

FORBES,

Defendant/CounterplaintiffAppellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the separate motions of the Probate and Estate 

Planning Section and the Real Property Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan to file 

briefs amicus curiae are GRANTED. The amicus briefs will be accepted for filing if 

submitted on or before January 28, 2020.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 9, 2015

NO. 03-13-00526-CV

Pharmserv, Inc., Appellant

v.

Texas Health and Human Services Commission; Office of the Inspector General of the 

Texas Health and Human Services Commission; Kyle Janek, in his Official Capacity as 

Commissioner of Texas Health and Human Services Commission; and 

Stuart W. Bowen, Jr., in his Official Capacity as Inspector General, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART --

OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on July 24, 2013. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the 

court’s judgment. The Court reverses the portion of the judgment that dismisses Pharmserv’s 

claims and remands the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the Court’s 

opinion. The Court affirms the remainder of the trial court’s judgment. Each party shall bear 

their own costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sheer Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or

15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and results of operations

of the Company.





Date:  May 10, 2005





/s/ Doug Berry

---------------------------------------

Doug Berry, Principal Financial Officer
[Cite as State v. Collingsworth , 2024

- Ohio

- 3234.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO

, Appellee,

- vs

-

MICHAEL COLLINSWORTH

, Appell ant

. :

:

:

:

:

: CASE NO. CA 2024

- 04

- 050

D E C I S I O N 8/26/2024

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CR2023

- 11

- 1697

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and John Heinkel, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee

. Engel & Martin, LLC, and Mary K. Martin, for appellant

.

Per Curiam

. {¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by

appellant, Michael Collinsworth , the transcript of the docke t and journal entries, the

tran script of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common

Pleas, and upon the brief s

. {¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

, which (1) indicates that a careful review of the recordButler CA2024

- 04

- 050

- 2

- from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the

rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists three

potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744; (3) requests that

this court review the record independently t o determine whether the proceed ings are free

from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4)

requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant o n the basis that the appeal is

wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have

been served upon appellant.

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response

having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error

prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel

for appella nt requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed

for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

S. POWELL , P.J., HENDRICKSON and BYRNE

, J J., concur.[Cite as State v. Collingsworth , 2024

- Ohio

- 3234.]
Exhibit 32.1





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Zeno,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the  period  ended June 30,  2004 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.       The Report fully  complies with the  requirements of  Section  13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.       The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Company.


Date:  December 7, 2004



/s/ Frank McGill
------------------------------
Frank McGill
President, C.E.O. and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)



<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Cross Canyon Energy Corp. (the “Company”), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August 18, 2009

/s/  Robert P. MunnRobert P. MunnPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: Maxwell, Bill To: "Frey, Nathan J." Cc: Higgins, Cortney ; Culligan, Kevin ; Tsirigotis, Peter ; Wayland, Robertj Subject: RE: Current versions Date: Thursday, March 21, 2013 5:41:00 PM Attachments: MATS reconsideration NESHAP RTC_draft_032113.docx MATS reconsideration NESHAP RTC_031913 vs 032113_redline.docx

Attached is the final RTC and the redline against the previous version.

Thanks.

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-5430 FAX: 919-541-5450

From: Frey, Nathan J. [mailto:Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 2:41 PM To: Wayland, Robertj Cc: Higgins, Cortney; Culligan, Kevin; Maxwell, Bill; Tsirigotis, Peter Subject: RE: Current versions

Thanks Bob. I’ll be in touch about next steps.

From: Wayland, Robertj [ mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epa.gov ] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 2:18 PM To: Frey, Nathan J. Cc: Higgins, Cortney; Culligan, Kevin; Maxwell, Bill; Tsirigotis, Peter Subject: FW: Current versions Importance: High

Nathan –

Attached below are the revised MATS Reconsideration documents. The preamble is in final form, but OGC is still making editorial edits to the RTC document; however, we should have a final version later today if you would like to see that. Please let me or Kevin know if you need anything further to move this towards conclusion.

Thanx!

bob

### Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division Mail Code D243-01 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Office: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290
Fax: (919) 541-5450

Email: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document - FOIA Exempt

*************************************

From: Maxwell, Bill Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 2:14 PM To: Wayland, Robertj Subject: Current versions

Bob –

Here is –

The final version of the preamble with OMB’s edits A redline of the final vs. what went over on Tuesday The current version of the RTC as of Tuesday but with OMB’s edit incorporated A redline of that version of the RTC vs. what OMB received on March 15.

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-5430 FAX: 919-541-5450
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 9, 2015

NO. 03-15-00071-CV

Becky, Ltd., Appellant

v.

Milestone Community Builders, LLC; The City of Cedar Park; Matt Powell; 

Stephen Thomas; Mitch Fuller; Lyle Grimes; Lowell Moore; Jon Lux; and Don Tracy, 

Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on December 23, 2014. Becky, Ltd. 

has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that 

the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal. 

The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
EXHIBIT 32.2GLOBAL CASH ACCESS HOLDINGS, INC.CERTIFICATIONIn connection with the periodic report of Global Cash Access Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), I, Harry C. Hagerty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of thedate hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,that to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated.        Dated: August 14, 2006 By:  /s/ Harry C. Hagerty    Harry C. Hagerty    Chief Financial Officer