alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: September 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 183)]
[Notices]               
[Page 57826]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22se10-116]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7180]

 
Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``On Line: Drawing Through the Twentieth Century''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``On Line: Drawing Through the Twentieth 
Century,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Museum of Modern Art, New York, New York, from on or about November 
21, 2010, until on or about February 7, 2011, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 16, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-23691 Filed 9-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 728 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 728

Amending rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate to limit debate 
                         on motions to proceed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 13, 2018

 Mr. Merkley submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
               the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate to limit debate 
                         on motions to proceed.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. LIMITING DEBATE ON MOTIONS TO PROCEED UNDER RULE XXII.

    Rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate is amended by--
            (1) redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (3) 
        and (4), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
            ``2. Other than a motion made during the first 2 hours of a 
        new legislative day, as described in paragraph 2 of rule VIII, 
        consideration of a motion to proceed to the consideration of 
        any debatable matter, including consideration of any debatable 
        motion or appeal in connection therewith, shall be limited to 
        not more than 2 hours, to be divided equally between the 
        majority and the minority. This paragraph shall not apply to 
        motions considered nondebatable by the Senate pursuant to rule 
        or precedent.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2004094EN.01004101.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/41

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 6 January 2004

in Case T-113/02 Gustaaf van Dyck v Commission of the European Communities (1)

1

(Staff case - Action for annulment - Act adversely affecting the applicant - Inadmissibility)

(2004/C 94/117)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case T-113/02: Gustaaf van Dyck, an official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Wuustwezel (Belgium), represented by S. Corbanie, lawyer, and by A.E. Bywater, Solicitor, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and H.M.H. Speyart), application for annulment of the Commission's decision of 10 January 2002 rejecting the complaint of 14 August 2001, of the Commission's decision of 5 July 2001 rejecting the informal appeal of 1 July 2001 and of the Commission's alleged decision of unknown date revising the applicant's staff report, the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, and V. Tiili and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 16 January 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | The application is rejected as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is rejected as inadmissible;

| 2. | The parties shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The parties shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ 2002 C 131, 1.6.02

1

---
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 28 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 

2019, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2019 (division 

4 C of Public Law 115–245) is further amended by 
2 

•HJ 28 EH 

1 striking the date specified in section 105(3) and inserting 

2 ‘‘February 28, 2019’’. 

3 This joint resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Further 

4 Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2019’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 23, 

2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 28 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal 

year 2019, and for other purposes.
**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of INverso Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; 

and 

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  

INverso Corp.

Date: May 13, 2005 

By:   /s/   Thomas Kirchner 

    Thomas Kirchner

    Chief Executive Officer 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 48 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing 

that the rights extended by the Constitution are the rights of natural 

persons only. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 22, 2019 

Ms. JAYAPAL (for herself, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Ms. NORTON, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. 

KHANNA, Mr. RYAN, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. TAKANO, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. BONAMICI, and Ms. GABBARD) submitted the following 

joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States providing that the rights extended by the Constitution are the rights of natural persons only. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HJ 48 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. The rights protected by the Constitution 

5 of the United States are the rights of natural persons only. 

6 Artificial entities, such as corporations, limited liability 

7 companies, and other entities, established by the laws of 

8 any State, the United States, or any foreign state shall 

9 have no rights under this Constitution and are subject to 

10 regulation by the People, through Federal, State, or local 

11 law. The privileges of artificial entities shall be determined 

12 by the People, through Federal, State, or local law, and 

13 shall not be construed to be inherent or inalienable. 

14 ‘‘SECTION 2. Federal, State and local government 

15 shall regulate, limit, or prohibit contributions and expendi16 tures, including a candidate’s own contributions and ex17 penditures, to ensure that all citizens, regardless of their 

18 economic status, have access to the political process, and 

19 that no person gains, as a result of that person’s money, 

20 substantially more access or ability to influence in any way 

21 the election of any candidate for public office or any ballot 

22 measure. Federal, State, and local governments shall re23 quire that any permissible contributions and expenditures 

24 be publicly disclosed. The judiciary shall not construe the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HJ 48 IH 

1 spending of money to influence elections to be speech 

2 under the First Amendment. 

3 ‘‘SECTION 3. Nothing contained in this amendment 

4 shall be construed to abridge the freedom of the press.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6509

ISAIAH T. FEASTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RALPH LOGAN, Warden; MAJOR RICHIE, Correctional Officer; MAJOR EAST, Correctional Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-99-

794-AMD)

Submitted: August 5, 1999 Decided: August 11, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Isaiah T. Feaster, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Isaiah T. Feaster appeals from the district court's order

dismissing without prejudice this complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (1994). The district court’s dismissal without prejudice is

not appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union

392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). A dismissal without

prejudice is a final order only if "'no amendment [to the complaint] could cure the defects in the plaintiff's case.'" Id. In

ascertaining whether a dismissal without prejudice is reviewable in

this Court, we must determine "whether the plaintiff could save his

action by merely amending his complaint." Id. Because the grounds

for dismissal of this action show that Feaster could save his

action in the district court, the dismissal order is not appealable. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lease Equity Appreciation Fund
II, L.P. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Crit S. DeMent, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

May 16, 2005                               /s/ Crit S. DeMent
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Crit S. DeMent
                                           Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 POLYPORE, INC.
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polypore, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  November 14, 2006
    /s/  Robert B. TothRobert B. TothPresident and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1


Certifications




I,
David Lichtenstein, certify that:




1.
            I have reviewed this quarterly
      report on Form 10-Q of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust,
      Inc.;




2.
            Based on my knowledge, this
      report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
      state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
      the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this
  report;




3.
            Based on my knowledge, the
      financial statements, and other financial information included in this
      report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
      periods presented in this
report;




4.
            The registrant’s other certifying
      officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
      controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
      15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:




a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;




5.
            The registrant’s other certifying
      officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
      internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors
      and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors:




a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




May 15,
2009




/s/ David LichtensteinDavid
      LichtensteinChairman
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
THE VISUAL AIDS ON THE FOLLOWING 

PAGES ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND 

NOT INTENDED FOR OFFICIAL USE.

TO PURCHASE OFFICIAL VISUAL AIDS PLEASE CONTACT 

THE SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION’S 

EQUIPMENT AND FORMS DEPOT 

USDA, AMS, FVP, SCI

831 MITTEN ROAD, ROOM 200

BURLINGAME, CA 94010

PHONE: 650-552-9073

FAX: 650-552-9147

EQUIPMENT CATALOG
Common Green Onions

 THRIP INJURY GON-1-IDENT

September 2002
IA 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 32 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to give 

States the authority to repeal Federal rules and regulations when the 

repeal is agreed to by the legislatures of two-thirds of the several States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 22, 2019 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah submitted the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to give States the authority to repeal Federal 

rules and regulations when the repeal is agreed to by 

the legislatures of two-thirds of the several States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 32 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. The several States may repeal, in whole 

5 or in part, any Presidential Executive order, rule, regula6 tion, other regulatory action, or administrative ruling 

7 issued by a department, agency, or instrumentality of the 

8 United States. Such repeal shall take effect upon approval 

9 by the legislatures of two-thirds of the several States of 

10 resolutions for this purpose that particularly describe the 

11 same whole or part of the Executive order, rule, regula12 tion, other regulatory action, or administrative ruling to 

13 be repealed. 

14 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress shall have power to enforce 

15 this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS