alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 76 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 76

Expressing support for the designation of March 21, 2017, as ``National 
                        Rosie the Riveter Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 1, 2017

 Mr. Casey (for himself, Mr. Isakson, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Coons, and Mrs. 
Shaheen) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for the designation of March 21, 2017, as ``National 
                        Rosie the Riveter Day''.

Whereas National Rosie the Riveter Day is a collective national effort to raise 
        awareness of the 16,000,000 women who worked during World War II;
Whereas the people of the United States have chosen to honor women workers who 
        contributed from the home front during World War II;
Whereas those women left their homes to work or volunteer full-time in 
        factories, farms, shipyards, airplane factories, banks, and other 
        institutions in support of the Armed Forces overseas;
Whereas those women worked with the United Service Organizations and the 
        American Red Cross, drove trucks, riveted airplane parts, collected 
        critical materials, rolled bandages, and served on rationing boards;
Whereas it is fitting and proper to recognize and preserve the history and 
        legacy of working women, including volunteer women, during World War II 
        to promote cooperation and fellowship among those women and their 
        descendants;
Whereas those women and their descendants wish to further the advancement of 
        patriotic ideas, excellence in the workplace, and loyalty to the United 
        States; and
Whereas March 21, 2017, during Women's History Month, is an appropriate day to 
        designate as ``National Rosie the Riveter Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the designation of March 21, 2017, as 
        ``National Rosie the Riveter Day''; and
            (2) acknowledges the important role played by women during 
        World War II.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

 Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF COTTON

FOR RELEASE AT 12:00 P.M. CT October 12, 2022

U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of cotton. The cotton bales were

sold on The SEAM dated October 11, 2022.

Offer No. Catalog Location Pounds

Sold

Bales 

Sold

Price Sold 

(per Pound) CCC Revenue

TS1133265 AR and MO 7,311 15 $0.3050 $2,229.89
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 614 

Honoring the life and legacy of Coya Knutson. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 22, 2018 

Ms. SMITH (for herself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life and legacy of Coya Knutson. 

Whereas Cornelia Genevive Gjesdal ‘‘Coya’’ Knutson was 

born on August 22, 1912, in Edmore, North Dakota; 

Whereas Coya Gjesdal graduated from Concordia College in 

Moorhead, Minnesota, with majors in English and Music 

and a minor in Education; 

Whereas Coya Gjesdal married Andy Knutson in 1940 and 

later adopted a son; 

Whereas Coya Knutson was involved in her community, working as a teacher, volunteering, establishing a medical clinic, and serving on the Red Lake County Welfare Board; 

Whereas Coya Knutson was elected to the House of Representatives of Minnesota in 1950; 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 614 IS 

Whereas State Representative Knutson supported health and 

education initiatives and sponsored the first clean air bill 

in Minnesota, which prohibited smoking in some public 

places; 

Whereas, in 1954, Coya Knutson won a seat in the House 

of Representatives of the United States, despite having 

lost the nomination of her party to a man; 

Whereas Coya Knutson became the first woman elected to 

Congress from Minnesota; 

Whereas Congresswoman Knutson became the first woman to 

be appointed to the Committee on Agriculture of the 

House of Representatives; 

Whereas Congresswoman Knutson sponsored legislation that 

eventually led to expanded school lunch assistance, the 

first Federal student loan program, and the first appropriations for research on cystic fibrosis; 

Whereas Congresswoman Knutson’s husband did not support 

her career and reportedly wrote a public letter in 1958 

ordering her to return to Minnesota to ‘‘make a home for 

[her] son and husband’’; 

Whereas the story of the letter was taken up by the national 

press, with newspapers across the United States running 

the headline ‘‘Coya, Come Home’’; 

Whereas Coya Knutson lost reelection in 1958 to a man 

whose campaign slogan was ‘‘A Big Man for a Man-Sized 

Job’’; 

Whereas Coya Knutson eventually divorced her husband, 

moved permanently to Washington, DC, and was appointed by President Kennedy to be the liaison officer in 

the Office of Civil Defense at the Department of Defense, 

where she served until 1970; 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 614 IS 

Whereas Coya Knutson retired from politics and moved back 

to Minnesota to live with her son and his family until her 

death in 1996 at 82 years of age; and 

Whereas Coya Knutson was a trailblazer and an inspiration 

who was devoted to her community, State, and country: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate honors the life and legacy 

2 of Coya Knutson, whose dedication to overcoming excep3 tional odds and devotion to the well-being of the United 

4 States shall serve as an inspiration for generations of indi5 viduals in the United States. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7886

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. DALAINO LADELLE TURNER, Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:06-cr-00130-LMB-1)

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 31, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dalaino Ladelle Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, John C. Lynch, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dalaino Turner seeks to appe al the district court’s denial of his motion for appointment of counsel to file a motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Turner seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Miller v.

Simmons , 814 F.2d 962 (4th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
TRIAL COURT OFFICIAL'S

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RECORD

FAX to: Cathy S. Lusk, Clerk, 12th Court of Appeals, Tyler, at (903)593-2193

Court of Appeals No. (If known): 12 - - - 

 Trial Court No.:

Date Trial Clerk's Record Originally Due:

Date Court Reporter's/Recorder's Record Originally Due:

Anticipated Number of Pages of Record:

I am responsible for preparing a record in this appeal but I am unable to file the record by the original due date for 

the following reason/s: (Check all that apply - attach additional pages if necessary.)

o to the best of my knowledge, the Appellant has made no claim of indigence and has failed to either pay 

the required fee or to make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the record.

o my duties listed below preclude working on this record:

o Other. (Explain.):

I anticipate this record will be completed and forwarded to the 12th Court of Appeals by , and I 

hereby request an additional days within which to prepare it. TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3. 

In compliance with TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(e), I certify that a copy of this notice has been served on counsel for all 

parties to the trial Court's judgment or order being appealed. I further certify by my signature below that the 

information contained in this notice is true and within my personal knowledge.

Date Signature

Office Phone Number Printed Name

___________________________________ 

E-mail Address (if available) Official Title 

Trial Court Style: The State of Texas vs.

Trial Court & County: 7th District Court, Smith County 007-

N/A

30

(903)590-1647

Jennifer Lowrance

jlowrance@smith-county.com

Official Court Reporter

 /s/Jennifer Lowrance

15 CR 00167

Sidney C. Lynch

0443-15

8-03-15

800

X Reporter has been preparing & has filed records in

three cases this week: STX v. Gaylord Stevens, 007-1587-14; STX v Roger Jackson, 007-0964-14 & STX v

Steven Moore, 007-0446-15.

11-02-15

09-02-15

X Reporter will be on vacation the week of October 5-9.

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 10/2/2015 8:26:42 AM PAM ESTES Clerk
Trial Clerk's/Court Reporter's Request for Ext/12th CA-CsL/Tyler/12-3-97/Rev.5-3-2001

TEXAS RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.5(e) reads:

Certificate requirements. A certificate of service must be signed by the person who made the service 

and must state:

(1) the date and manner of service;

(2) the name and addresses of each person served; and

(3) if the person served is a party's attorney, the name of the party represented by that attorney.

The following parties have been served with a copy of this document:

(Information may be either printed or typed.)

Lead Counsel for APPELLANT(S): Lead Counsel for APPELLEE(S):

Name: Name:

Address: Address:

Phone no.: Phone no.: 

Attorney for: Attorney for:

Lead Counsel for APPELLANT(S): Lead Counsel for APPELLEE(S): 

Name: Name:

Address: Address: 

Phone no.: Phone no.:

Attorney for: Attorney for:

Additional information, if any: 

Mr. James W. Huggler, Jr.

100 E. Ferguson, Suite 802

Tyler, Texas 75702

(903)593-2400

Mr. Lynch

Mr. Michael West

100 North Broadway, Fourth Floor

Tyler, Texas 75702

(903)590-1724

The State of Texas
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

      ( print page 2760)    
                    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in                     *United States*                     v.                     *Triad Mining, Inc.,*                     Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-0026, was lodged with the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana on January 11, 2012.                 

This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the United States against the Defendant, pursuant to Sections 309(b) and (d) of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. 1319(b) and (d), to obtain injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties against the Defendant for the discharge of pollutants into waters of the United States without authorization by the United States, in violation of CWA Section 301(a), 33 U.S.C. 1311(a). The proposed Consent Decree resolves these allegations by requiring the Defendant to restore and/or mitigate the impacted areas and to pay a civil penalty. 

                    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Perry Rosen, Attorney, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044 and refer to                     *United States*                     v.                    *Triad Mining, Inc.,*                     DJ# 90-5-1-1-18796.                 

                    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, 46 East Ohio Street Room 105, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46204. In addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be viewed at                     *http://www.justice.gov/​enrd/​Consent_​Decrees.html.*

Cherie L. Rogers, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment & Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 2012-914 Filed 1-18-12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 32.1


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Solutions With Art, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Carla Santia, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Carla Santia___
----------------------------------
Carla Santia
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer


May 18, 2005
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
128732 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128732 COA: 258736 Berrien CC: 1998-490001-FC MARSHALL DONELL FORREST III, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 7, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2005

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-873]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7769]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Princes and Painters in Mughal Delhi, 1707-1857''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Princes and Painters in Mughal Delhi, 
1707-1857,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Asia Society, New York, NY from on or about February 7, 2012, until 
on or about May 6, 2012, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202) 
632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 11, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-873 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Serge Atlan, certify that: 

  1) I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-QSB of FalconTarget, Inc.;  

  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;  

  3) Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;  

  4) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  

  a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based upon such evaluation; and  

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and  

  5) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):  

  a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information and 

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: June 5, 2007

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan 

    Serge Atlan

    Chairman
~OS741 • UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

~

_____ 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 ‘kL pRO1~’ October 17, 2014 Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency Bldg No.2695, Window Rock Blvd Window RockAZ 86515 ATTN: ADM1N OFFICE Subject: Public documents at the Navajo Nation EPA for public inspection Dear Siror Madam: The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency sentyou apackage containing a number ofdocuments regarding the McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation nearthe city ofAneth, San Juan County, Utah. Two ofthese documents contained an error, and need to be replaced. Please replace the following documents in the package previously sentto you with the enclosed documents: 1. PUBLIC INFORMATION SHEET 2. AMBIENTAIR QUALITY IMPACT REPORT & FACT SHEET Yourassistance with this matter is greatly appreciated. Feel freeto contact me at (415) 947-4156 or kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov ifyou have any questions.Sincerely,

Shaheerah Kelly, Environmental Engineer Permits Office Air Division
Enclosures
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 1934** 

NARDEV SINGH , Petitioner ,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted : March 29, 2016 Decided: April 1, 2016

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

William H. Berger, BERGER AND BERGER, Buffalo, New York, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jane Candaux, Assistant Director, Jeremy M. Bylund, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D

. C

. , for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Nardev Singh , a native and citizen of India , petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision finding him removable pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(G)(ii) (2012). We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the agency properly determined that Singh is removable from

the United States as an alien who fail ed or refus ed to fulfill the marital agreement that was made for the purpose of procuring his admission as an immigrant

. See § 1227(a)(1)(G)(ii). We further conclude that substantial evidence supports the adverse credibility finding, see Tewabe v. Gonzales , 446 F.3d 533, 538 (4th Cir. 2006), and that Singh cannot demonstrate a violation of his due process rights as he fails to show the requisite prejudice. See Anim v. Mukasey , 535 F.3d 243, 256 (4th Cir.
2008). Accordingly, we deny t he petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Singh (B.I.A. July 22, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIE D