alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

|  | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 23, 2022 | /s/ Rich Kleiman |
|----------------------|------------------|
|                 | Name:            | Rich Kleiman |
|                 | Title:           | Co-Chief Executive Officer |
|                 |             | (Principal Executive Officer) |

----
March 2 4 , 2015

Mr. Michael Rea

2279 Taylor Road

Central Point, OR 97502

Dear Mr. Rea :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your February 25 , 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0487 ) , but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and th e extent of

the relief you seek

.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

• The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemp tion

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exempti on.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9521

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATIONS








I, Jason C. Behnke, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2022-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.





Date:  March 20, 2024


/s/ Jason C. BehnkeJason C. BehnkeVice President - Assistant TreasurerFord Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer(senior officer in charge of servicing function)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7453

REGINALD TERRELL LEACH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHERYL BELL; ANTHONY E. RAND; WILLIS J. FOWLER; DERRICK E. 

WADSWORTH; CHARLES MANN, SR.; ANDREW TERRELL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:11-ct-03203-BO)

Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 27, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Terrell Leach, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Terrell Leach appeals the district court’s 

orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint

and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Leach’s motions

for appointment of counsel and for relief from his obligation to 

serve the Appellees and affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. See Leach v. Bell, No. 5:11-ct-03203-BO

(E.D.N.C. May 2, 2012; June 22, 2012). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT June 7, 2007 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O RT H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 06- 16212 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D. C . Do c k e tNo . 0 5 - 0 0 4 5 6 - C R - T - 1 7 - MAP U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s O R L A N D O V E N E C I L L A S A L A S , a .k .a . S a la s O r lan d o , D e f e n d an t- A p p e llan t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe M i ddl e D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( Ju n e 7, 2007) B efo re B IR C H , B A R K E T T an dH U L L , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E RC U R I A M: John K i ng st on , appo i nt ed appel l at e c ou nselfor O rl ando V enec i l l a S al as , has2

f ile dam o tio n to w ith d r aw o n ap p e a l, s up p o rte db yab r ie f p r e p ar e dp u r s u an t to A nde r s v. C a l i f

orni a , 386 U . S . 738, 87 S . C t . 1396, 18 L . E d. 2d 493 ( 1967) . O ur i nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of

the e nt i r e r e c or d r e ve a l s tha tc ouns e l ’ s a s s e s s m e ntof the r e l a t i ve m e r i tof

the appe a l i s c orr e c t . B e c aus e i nde pe nde nte xam i na t i on of the e n tir e r e c o r dr e v e a ls n o ar g u ab le is s u e s o f m e r it, c o u n s e l’s m o tio n to w ith d r aw is G R A N TED , and S al as ’ s c on vi ct i on s andse nt ence ar e A FFI R M ED .
TS-EMLA10/20/30 

Attachment #8

Pt. 2, Sec. B, End 

Worker/Occupational Exposure and Environmental Release Information on the 

New Chemical Substance at Industrial Sites Controlled by Others
Exhibit 31.1  Certifications  I, Mike McKeever, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N4 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d- 18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following  unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Computershare Trust Company, National  Association.  Date: March 26, 2024  /s/ Mike McKeever  Mike McKeever  President  Carvana Receivables Depositor LLC  (senior officer in charge of securitization)
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8694]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
National Advisory Board on Medical Rehabilitation Research.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: National Advisory Board on Medical 
Rehabilitation Research.
    Date: May 3-4, 2012.
    Time: May 3, 2012, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: NICHD Director's Report presentation, NCMRR Director's 
Report presentation, NIH Blue Ribbon Panel on Rehabilitation 
presentation and various reports on Medical Research Initiatives.
    Place: Hilton Washington/Rockville 1750 Rockville Pike 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Time: May 4, 2012, 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: Other business with NABMRR Board.
    Place: Hilton Washington/Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Ralph M. Nitkin, Ph.D., Director, B.S.C.D., 
Biological Sciences and Career Development, NCMRR, Eunice Kennedy 
Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 
NIH, DHHS, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 2A03, Bethesda, MD 20892-
7510, (301) 402-4206, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#57393e233c3e3925173a363e3b79393e3f79303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="86e8eff2edefe8f4c6ebe7efeaa8e8efeea8e1e9f0">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: www.nichd.nih.gov/about/ncmrr.htm, where an agenda and any 
additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 4, 2012.
Anna P. Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-8694 Filed 4-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Certifications

I, Michael P. Moore, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of
MISCOR Group, Ltd.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: August 6, 2013



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael P. Moore                 
|Michael P. Moore                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Toohey *v.*Simmons: The Ohio State Life Ins. Co., Appellee; Vatick, Appellant.

(No. 31471

Decided October 13, 1948.)

*Mr. Clifford L. Mueller,*for appellant. •

*Messrs. Matthews & Matthews,*for appellee.

Tt is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner,, Matthias, Hart, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.

Zimmerman, J., not participating.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 87

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the 2001 District of Columbia Special

Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run to be runthrough the Capitol Grounds.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 87

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

•HCON 87 EH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF D.C. SPECIAL

2 OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN

3 THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

4 On June 1, 2001, or on such other date as the Speak5 er of the House of Representatives and the Committee on

6 Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly des7 ignate, the 2001 District of Columbia Special Olympics

8 Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred

9 to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through the Capitol

10 Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics

11 torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics sum12 mer games at Gallaudet University in the District of Co13 lumbia.

14 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

15 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as

16 may be necessary to carry out the event.

17 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA18 TIONS.

19 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions

20 for physical preparations for the event.

21 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

22 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce23 ment of the restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act

24 of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), con25 cerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations
3

•HCON 87 EH

1 on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions appli2 cable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.

Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

KENNETH P. BEYERS,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF STATE,

Respondent.

______________________ 

2014-3071

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. DC-3330-11-0538-M-1.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

 Kenneth P. Beyers moves for a 14-day extension of 

time, until May 15, 2014, to file his reply brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted.

Case: 14-3071 Document: 14 Page: 1 Filed: 05/01/2014
2 BEYERS v. STATE

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

s27

Case: 14-3071 Document: 14 Page: 2 Filed: 05/01/2014
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Form 10-Q of Shengtai Pharmaceutical, Inc. (the "Company")
      for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Qingtai
                    LiuQingtai
                    LiuChief
                    Executive Officer
                  Date:
                    November 13, 2007




/s/
                    Yizhao ZhangYizhao
                    ZhangChief
                    Financial Officer
                  Date:
                    November 13, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Shengtai Pharmaceutical, Inc. and will be retained by Shengtai Pharmaceutical,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
III

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 448

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 25, 2002

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a special meeting of the Congress in New

York, New York, on Friday, September 6, 2002, in remembrance of the victims and the heroes of September

11, 2001, in recognition of the courage and spirit of

the City of New York, and for other purposes.

Whereas on September 11, 2001, thousands of innocent people were killed and injured in combined terrorist attacks

involving four hijacked airliners, the World Trade Center,

and the Pentagon;

Whereas in the aftermath of the attacks, thousands more

were left grieving for beloved family and friends,
2

HCON 448 RDS

livelihoods were compromised, and businesses and property were damaged and lost;

Whereas the greatest loss of life, personal injury, and physical destruction occurred in and was sustained by the

City of New York;

Whereas Government and the American people responded decisively, through the bravery, sacrifice and toil of the fire

and rescue workers, law enforcement, building trades,

caregivers, Armed Forces, and millions more who through

their many expressions of care and compassion brought

forth comfort, hope, and the promise of recovery;

Whereas the City of New York attended to the aftermath of

the destruction of the World Trade Center with profound

respect for the victims and compassion to the survivors;

and

Whereas the City of New York has invited the Congress to

meet at the site of the original Federal Hall, where the

First Congress of the United States convened on March

4, 1789: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That, in remembrance of the victims and the

3 heroes of September 11, 2001, and in recognition of the

4 courage and spirit of the City of New York, the Congress
3

HCON 448 RDS

1 shall conduct a special meeting in Federal Hall in New

2 York, New York, on September 6, 2002.

Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 2002.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1)    | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|   | (2)    | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |

|   | /s/                David G. Baker                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | David                G. Baker                        |
|   | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (Chief                Executive Officer)             |
|   |                                                 |
|   |                                                 |
|   | /s/                Nandini S. Mallya                 |
|   | Nandini                S. Mallya                     |
|   | Vice                President and Treasurer          |
|   | (Chief                Financial Officer)             |