alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7615

GREGORY L. SMITH, a/k/a Sharrieff El-Shabazz, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus
HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board, in her individual and official capacities; DAVID N. HARKER, Vice Chairman, Virginia Parole Board in his individual and official capacities; GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, in his individual and official capacities; DORIS L. EWING, Manager of the Court & Legal Services Unit of the Virginia Department of Corrections, in her individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 05-7616

ANTONIO A. ANTHONY, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus
HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board, in her individual and official- 2 - capacities; DAVID N. HARKER, Vice Chairman Virginia Parole Board, in his individual and official capacities; GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, in his individual and official capacities; DORIS L. EWING, Manager of the Court & Legal Services Unit of the Virginia Department of Corrections, in her individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 05-7617

ANTHONY DENARO FREEMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus
HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board, in her individual and official capacities; DAVID N. HARKER, Vice Chairman Virginia Parole Board, in his individual and official capacities; GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, in his individual and official capacities; DORIS L. EWING, Manager of the Court & Legal Services Unit of the Virginia Department of Corrections, in her individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-05-52-2)- 3 - Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 29, 2006
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory L. Smith, Antonio A. Anthony, Anthony Denaro Freeman, Appellants Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 4 - PER CURIAM: Gregory L. Smith, Antonio A. Anthony, and Anthony Denaro Freeman appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. Fahey ; Anthony v. Fahey ; Freeman v. Fahey , No. CA-05-52-2 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 6, 2005 & entered Sept. 7, 2005). We also deny Appellants’ motion for reconsideration of their request to consolidate the filing fee. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EX-10.23





 Exhibit 10.23 

EXHIBIT B 

THIRD AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE 

THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE (this “Third Amendment”) is made and entered into as of 1.13.15 (the
“Effective Date”), by and between SF OFFICE 2, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Landlord”), and LIFE360, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Tenant”). 

RECITALS: 

A.    Landlord and Tenant entered into that certain Office Lease dated as of October __, 2013 (the
“Original Lease”), as amended by that certain Amendment to Lease dated as of November 25, 2013 (the “First Amendment”) between Landlord and Tenant, pursuant to which Landlord leased to Tenant and
Tenant leased from Landlord approximately 7,762 rentable square feet of space (the “Original Premises”), commonly known as Suite 402, and located on the fourth
(4th) floor of that certain building located at 539 Bryant Street, San Francisco, California (the “Building”). 

B.    Landlord and Tenant entered into that certain Second Amendment to Office Lease dated as of November 24, 2014
(the “Second Amendment”), pursuant to which the parties, among other things, expanded the Original Premises to include that certain space, commonly known as Suite 400 and containing approximately 3,602 rentable square
feet located on the fourth (4th) floor of the Building, as depicted on Exhibit A attached to the Second Amendment (the “Expansion Space”).

 C.    The Original Lease, First Amendment and Second Amendment are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the
“Lease”. 
 D.    Except as otherwise set forth herein, all capitalized terms used in this Third
Amendment shall have the same meaning as given such terms in the Lease. 
 E.    Landlord and Tenant desire to amend the
Lease to confirm the Expansion Space Commencement Date and Revised Expiration Date, as hereinafter provided. 
 AGREEMENT: 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals and the mutual covenants contained herein, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

1.    Confirmation of Dates. The parties hereby confirm that the Expansion Space Term commenced as of 1.1.15
(the “Expansion Space Commencement Date”) for a term ending on 12.31.2017 (the “Revised Expiration Date”) (unless sooner terminated as provided in the Lease). 

2.    No Further Modification. Except as set forth in this Third Amendment, all of the terms and provisions of the
Lease shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect. 

  
 EXHIBIT B 

-1- 













 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Third Amendment has been executed as of the day and year first
above written. 
  

							
	“LANDLORD”	 		 	SF OFFICE 2, LLC,
		 		 	a Delaware limited liability company
				
		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Sean Banner

		 		 	Name:	 	Sean Banner
		 		 	Its:	 	President
			
	“TENANT”	 		 	LIFE360, INC.,
		 		 	a Delaware corporation
				
		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Chris Hulls

		 		 	Name:	 	Chris Hulls
		 		 	Its:	 	CEO
				
		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Alex Haro

		 		 	Name:	 	Alex Haro
		 		 	 Its:
	 	 President



  
 EXHIBIT B 

-2-
ALTERNATIVE INTAKE TECHNOLOGIES 

AT INDIAN POINT UNITS 2 & 3 

Attachment 2 

Attachment 2 

Post-Modification Site Renderings and Conceptual Drawings 
Page 2 of 20 

Figure 2-1 2.0 mm Fine Mesh Ristroph Screen Expanded Intake Layout 
Page 3 of 20 

Figure 2-2 2.0 mm Fine Mesh Ristroph Screen Expanded Intake Plan & Details
Page 4 of 20 

Figure 2-3 2.0 mm Fine Mesh Ristroph Screen Expanded Intake Plan & Details
Page 5 of 20 

Figure 2-4 2.0 mm Dual Flow Screen Expanded Intake Layout 
Page 6 of 20 

Figure 2-5 2.0 mm Dual Flow Screen Expanded intake Plan & Details, Un
Page 7 of 20 

Figure 2-6 2.0 mm Dual Flow Screen Expanded Intake Plan & Details, Un
Page 8 of 20 

Figure 2-7 Aquatic Filter Barrier Layout (10 gpm/ft2), Units 2 and 3 
Page 9 of 20 

Figure 2-8 Aquatic Filter Barrier Layout (7.5 gpm/ft2), Units 2 and 3 
Page 10 of 20 

Figure 2-9 9.0 mm Cylindrical Wedgewire Screen Layout (Through-Slot Velocity of 0.5 f
Page 11 of 20 

Figure 2-10 9.0 mm Cylindrical Wedgewire Screen Plan & Details (Through-Slot Velocity of 0
Page 12 of 20 

Figure 2-11 2.0 mm Cylindrical Wedgewire Screen Layout (Through-Slot Velocity of 0.5 f
Page 13 of 20 

Figure 2-12 2.0 mm Cylindrical Wedgewire Screen Plan & Details(Through-Slot Velocity of 0
Page 14 of 20 

Figure 2-13 9.0 mm Cylindrical Wedgewire Screen Layout (Through-Slot Velocity of 0.25 
Page 15 of 20 

Figure 2-14 9.0 mm Cylindrical Wedgewire Screen Plan & Details (Through-Slot Velocity of 0
Page 16 of 20 

Figure 2-15 2.0 mm Cylindrical Wedgewire Screen Layout (Through-Slot Velocity of 0.25 
Page 17 of 20 

Figure 2-16 2.0 mm Cylindrical Wedgewire Screen Plan & Details (Through-Slot Velocity of 0
Page 18 of 20 

Figure 2-17 Individual Porous Dike Layout, Units 2 and 3 
Page 19 of 20 

Figure 2-18 Combined Porous Dike Layout, Units 2 and 3 
Page 20 of 20 

Figure 2-19 Radial Well Layout, Units 2 & 3
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Worldtek Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Bernard Artz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By: /s/  Bernard Artz
         ------------------------
         Bernard Artz
         Chief Executive Officer
         November 29, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7847]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “The Printed Image in China, 8th-21st Century,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York from on or about May 5, 2012, until on or about July 29, 2012, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

*Dated:*                             April 10, 2012.                        

Ann Stock,

Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2012-9082 Filed 4-13-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2023 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2023-1, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





1. CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





2. The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.





3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on January 25, 2023 and ending on February 28, 2023 and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.








Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 26th day of May, 2023.





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Andrew J. McMonigle


Andrew J. McMonigle


Vice President and Treasurer
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IASIS Healthcare LLC;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ David R. WhiteDavid R. WhiteChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
1. AC61.136 – Date: 7/14/08 – Subject: FAA approval of Basic Aviation Training Devises (BATD) and 

Advanced Aviation Training Devices (AATD). Cancels AC61.126 – Qualification and Approval of 

Personal Computer-Based Aviation Training Devices, dated 5/12/97 and AC120-45 – Airplane Flight 

Training Device Qualification, dated 2/5/92.

2. Final rule, 14CFR Parts 61, 91, and 141, Docket No. FAA-2006-26661; Amendment Nos. 61-214, 91-

309 and 141-12, Pilot, Flight Instructor, and Pilot School Certification. Federal Register/Vol. 74, No. 

161/ Friday, August 21, 2009.

3. AC61.136A – Date 11/17/14 – Subject: FAA approval of Aviation Training Devices and Their Use 

for Training and Experience. Cancels AC61-136, FAA Approval of BATD and AATD, dated July 14, 

2008.

4. Direct final rule, 14CFR Part 61 and 141 Aviation Training Device Credit: Pilot Certification, Docket 

No: FAA-2014-0987-0001, RIN 2120-AK62, Federal Registration No. 2014-28485, Date posted Dec 3, 

2014.

5. Direct final rule; withdrawal, 14CFR Parts 61 and 141, Aviation Training Device Credit: Pilot 

Certification; Withdrawal. ID: FAA-2014-0987-0024, RIN: 2120-AK62, Federal Register Number: 

2015-00553, Date Posted Jan 15, 2015.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than April, 25, 2012.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City**                     (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

                    1.                     *Andrew H. Wells,*                     Tahlequah, Oklahoma, as trustee of The Clair Squyres Trust FBO Clair Squyres Wells and The Louise Squyres Trust FBO Earl E. Squyres; to acquire control of Maxlou Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire control of First State Bank, both in Tahlequah, Oklahoma.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 5, 2012.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2012-8537 Filed 4-9-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Thomas Kirchner, certify that: 

  1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of INverso Corp.;  

  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  

  3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  

  4) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  

  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; and  

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and  

  5) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  

  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and  

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.  

Date: January 26, 2005 

By:   /s/   Thomas Kirchner 

    Thomas Kirchner

    Chief Executive Officer
#### Ignacio M. ALVARADO, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

No. 5133.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

April 17, 1981.

*583Paul J. Nangle, Nangle, Clark & Mimms, Philip P. Weidner, Drathman & Weidner, Anchorage, for appellant.

James V. Gould, Asst. Dist. Atty., Larry R. Weeks, Dist. Atty., Anchorage, Wilson L. Condon, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellee.

Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ., and DIMOND, Senior Justice.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Ignacio M. Alvarado was convicted of two counts of lewd and lascivious acts toward a child, committed in violation of former' AS 11.15.134.1 He was sentenced to concurrent eight year terms, with three years suspended. In this appeal Alvarado claims that bis sentence is excessive.

We are not convinced that the superior court was clearly mistaken. *McClain v. State,*519 P.2d 811 (Alaska 1974). Accordingly, Alvarado’s sentence is AFFIRMED.

RABINOWITZ, C. J., joined by DIMOND, Senior Justice, dissents.

COMPTON, J., not participating.

1

. Alvarado, a 48-year-old man, invited two female children, ages 11 and 12, to spend the night with him at a motel. During their stay he showed them pornographic materials, fondled the bare breasts of both children, engaged in an act of cunnilingus with one and had her sit on his pelvic region until he ejaculáted, while the other child watched. While no force was involved, and the children were apparently willing to participate, the serious nature of Alvarado’s conduct is obvious.

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice,

dissenting, joined by DIMOND, Senior Justice.

I am of the view that the superior court was clearly mistaken in imposing concurrent eight-year terms of imprisonment, with three years suspended. Given the circumstances that these were Alvarado’s first convictions (he did have a seventeen-year-old OMVI conviction as well as a two-year-old OMVI conviction), and that he is forty-eight years of age, is hard working and has a solid employment history, I have concluded that the sentences were excessive.

Admittedly, Alvarado’s conduct is serious. Given the ages of the children, the potential harmful consequences of such conduct to the children involved, and the need to protect society from such anti-social conduct, a significant period of incarceration is warranted. On the other hand, in light of the absence of any serious prior record, and the positive elements in Alvarado’s background, I am of the view that Alvarado’s concurrent sentences should not exceed five years’ incarceration with two years thereof suspended.