alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRESIDENT**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Blackhawk Capital Group
      BDC, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Craig
      A.
      Zabala, as President of the Company, hereto certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:




1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Act of 1934; and




2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date:  August
      11, 2006








/s/
      Craig A. Zabala


Craig
      A.
      Zabala


President


(Principal
      Executive Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Blackhawk Capital Group BDC Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7185

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SHAUN A. BROOKS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CR-00-7-2, CA-02-22-2) Submitted: October 9, 2003 Decided: October 21, 2003 Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shaun A. Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Sherry L. Muncy, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia; Paul Thomas Camilletti, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Shaun A. Brooks seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. Brooks cannot appeal this order unless a circuit judge or justice issues a certificate of appealability, and a certificate of appealability will not issue absent a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A habeas appellant meets this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1039 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude Brooks has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Order issued January 28 , 201 6

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 6
- 00 062
- CV

——————————— IN RE JEFFREY C. GRIMM , Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

MEMORANDUM ORDER Relator, Jeffrey C. Grimm, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus arising from a divorce proceeding where the trial court’s January 21, 2016 contempt and commitment order which sentenced him to 60 consecutive days in jail to be served immediately until certain monies are paid for child support arrearages and attorneys’ fees. 1 Relator’s petition also seeks temporary relief of

1 The underlying case is Jeffrey C. Grimm v. Linda K. Grimm , Cause No. CCL6776, in the County Court at Law, Washington County, Texas, the Honorable Matthew Reue presiding.2

release from custody or on bail, pending consideration of his petition. The Court is of the tentative opinion that a serious question concerning the relief requested by the petition requires further consideration. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 52.8(b). Accordingly , the Court grants the relator’s request for temporary relief and
orders the Sheriff of Washington County to discharge relator from custody upon relator executing and filing with the Sheriff of Washington County a good and sufficient bond, conditioned as r equired by law, in the amount of $500.00. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(b)(3), 52.10(b); see also T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE § 22.221(d) (West Supp. 2015). This order will remain in effect until the petition in this Court is finally decided or until further order from t his Court. In addition, although relator stated in his petition that a hearing was held on January 21, 2016, he did not indicate whether it was recorded, whether any relevant testimony was adduced or ruling was explained, whether he had requested and paid for the record, and when it may be filed. Accordingly, we order relator, within five days of the date of this order , to provide evidence of requesting the reporter’s record, if any, on an expedited basis for the January 21, 2016 hearing and payment for or arrangements to pay for preparation of the reporter’s record.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.7(a)(2). Finally, the Court requests a response to the petition by real party in interest, Linda K. Grimm, with any relevant portions of the record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P.3

52.4(e), 52.8(b)(1). The response, if any, shall be filed within 20 days from the date of this order

. See id. 2, 52.4. It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting for the Court
Date: Januar y 28 , 2 01 6
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BLACKWATER MIDSTREAM CORP. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael D. Suder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





February
9, 2010








By: /s/ Michael D.
Suder


Michael
D. Suder, Chief Executive Officer
Document

Exhibit 10.20

Compensation Arrangements for FY 2023 
Named Executive Officers
Marvell Technology, Inc.
 Note: The following summary of compensation arrangements does not include all previously-reported compensation arrangements or awards granted under previously-disclosed incentive plans. Disclosures with respect to compensation for Named Executive Officers for the 2022 fiscal year were included in the Company's definitive proxy statement for the Company's 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the SEC on May 6, 2022, and additional disclosures with respect to compensation for Named Executive Officers for the 2023 fiscal year will be included in the Company's definitive proxy statement for the Company's 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. 
												
	

NAME 
	

TITLE
	

SALARY ($)
	INCENTIVE TARGET
(% OF SALARY)

	MATTHEW MURPHY	President and Chief Executive Officer	1,070,000	200
	RAGHIB HUSSAIN	President, Products and Technologies	640,000	100
	JEAN HU	Chief Financial Officer	640,000	100
	MITCHELL GAYNOR	Chief Administration and Legal Officer and Secretary	550,000	90
	DAN CHRISTMAN	EVP, Storage Products Group	510,000	90




Annual Incentive Plan for Fiscal Year 2023 (“AIP”)
The AIP is a cash incentive program that is designed to provide additional focus on the achievement of company goals, align target total cash compensation with actual Company performance, provide competitive total cash targets to attract and retain executive talent, and reward our executives for the achievement of Company goals. Under the AIP the Company’s executive officers are eligible to earn cash incentives based upon the achievement of pre-established performance goals. Total incentive opportunities will be based on achievement of semi-annual targets and will be paid annually. Incentive payouts may range between 0% and 200% of the target incentive opportunity.
The AIP provides for potential payouts based on the following metrics: 
•    revenue (45%), 
•    non-GAAP gross margin (25%), and
•    non-GAAP operating income margin (30%).
If the Company fails to achieve the threshold level for any of the above Company performance goals, no payout is awarded for that goal.
Payouts for the President and Chief Executive Officer and for the Chief Financial Officer will be based solely on the above Company performance goals. Payouts for the other executive officers may be based 80% on Company performance goals and 20% on individual performance goals, provided that no overachievement on the 20% individual component will be permitted unless the Company achieves at least 100% of the Company’s performance goals. Nevertheless, in its discretion, the Executive 





Exhibit 10.20

Compensation Committee may reduce the individual component for any executive officer (and increase the component based on Company performance) if it determines doing so would be appropriate in the circumstances. 
The Executive Compensation Committee determined that the combined application of all the metrics would make achievement difficult to meet at target and very difficult to meet at maximum payout.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Leslie A. Blodgett, Chief Executive Officer, and I, Myles B. McCormick, Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certify, pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Bare Escentuals, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 27, 2009, to which this Certificate is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 5, 2009





By:

/s/    LESLIE A. BLODGETTLeslie A. BlodgettChief Executive Officer and DirectorBy:

/s/    MYLES B. MCCORMICKMyles B. McCormickExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer


This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Bare Escentuals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 428 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 428

 Expressing the sense of the Congress that recitation of the Pledge of 
 Allegiance in schools is constitutional under the First Amendment to 
     the Constitution, and urging the Supreme Court to uphold the 
                  constitutionality of such practices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 26, 2002

 Mr. Hilleary submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress that recitation of the Pledge of 
 Allegiance in schools is constitutional under the First Amendment to 
     the Constitution, and urging the Supreme Court to uphold the 
                  constitutionality of such practices.

Whereas lessons and practices in schools provide a significant and long-lasting 
        impact in character and values development among young people;
Whereas the values of faith, patriotism and dedication to a cause larger than 
        self have consistently carried this country through difficult times;
Whereas countless Americans from Washington to Jefferson to Lincoln to Roosevelt 
        to everyday citizens have all acknowledged the role of Providence in the 
        history of our country;
Whereas the Congress itself has found value in beginning each session with an 
        invocation and a recital of the Pledge of Allegiance, including the 
        words ``one nation under God'';
Whereas in the ruling of 26 June 2001, the Court of the Ninth Circuit of the 
        United States ruled that the Pledge of Allegiance is an unconstitutional 
        endorsement of religion and cannot be recited in schools, more than 48 
        years after the present Pledge was instituted and in direct 
        contravention of 215 years of Constitutional law; and
Whereas statements of belief in a Supreme Power and the virtue of seeking 
        strength and protection from that Power are prevalent throughout our 
        national history, currency, and rituals; Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is 
the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance in schools, including the 
        phrase ``One Nation Under God'' is constitutional under the First 
        Amendment to the Constitution; and
            (2) the Supreme Court, accordingly, should uphold the 
        constitutionality of such practices.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

 Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF COTTON

FOR RELEASE AT 12:00 P.M. CT July 15, 2021

U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of cotton. The cotton bales were

sold on The SEAM dated July 14, 2021.

Offer No. Catalog Location Pounds

Sold

Bales 

Sold

Price Sold 

(per Pound) CCC Revenue

TS1105493 Taylor, TX 949 2 $.0826 $78.39
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certificationof CEO and CFO Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Theundersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer ofSunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, eachhereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

 

(a) TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,2010, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b) Informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August 6, 2010 |   | /s/ Arthur L. Buser    |
|----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
|                       |   | **Arthur L. Buser**         |
|                       |   | **Chief Executive Officer** |
|                       |   |                        |
|                       |   |                        |
| Date:  August 6, 2010 |   | /s/ Kenneth E. Cruse   |
|                       |   | **Kenneth E. Cruse**        |
|                       |   | **Chief Financial Officer** |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1072

KATASHA SMART-DAVIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-98-633-WMN)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 20, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Katasha Smart-Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Frederick G. Savage, Associate General Counsel, Gerard David St. Ours, Baltimore, Maryland,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the order from which Smart-Davis appeals was filed

on December 11, 1998, it was entered on the district court’s docket

sheet on December 14, 1998. December 14, 1998 is therefore the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Fed. R. Civ.

P. 58 and 79(a); see also Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35

(4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Katasha Smart-Davis appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on her complaint alleging violations of Title VI, Title VII,

and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See SmartDavis v. Johns Hopkins Univ., No. CA-98-633-WMN (D. Md. Dec. 14,

1998).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 6, 2021

N o. 04

- 19

- 00318

- CV

Leticia R. BENAVIDES

, Appellant

v.

Cristina B. ALEXANDER , as Permanent Guardian of the Person of Carlos Y. Benavides, Jr.; Carlos Y. Benavides, III; Rancho Viejo Cattle Company, Ltd.; Benavides Management, LLC;

and Linda Cristina Alexa nder and Guillermo Benavides, as Managers of Benavides Management, LLC, Appellees

From the 49th Judicial District Court

, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CVQ

- 000161

- D1 Honorable Honorable Jose A. Lopez , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: R ebec a C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Pa tricia O. Alvarez, Justice Beth Watkins, J us tice

The current deadline for appellant’s motion for rehearing is December 2, 2021. On

December 3, 2021, appellant filed an unopposed motion seeking a four

- day extension of that deadline. After consideration, we GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER her to file her motion for rehearing by December 6, 2021

.

It is so ORDERED on December 6, 2021.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, CLERK OF COURT
Formal Recommendation 

From: National Organic Standards Board (NOSB)

To: the National Organic Program (NOP)

Date: November 18, 2016

Subject: NOSB Resolution on Hydroponics

NOSB Chair: Tracy Favre

The NOSB hereby recommends to the NOP the following: 

Rulemaking Action: 

Guidance Statement:

Other: X

Statement of the Resolution: 

The National Organics Standards Board brings forward the following resolution:

The NOSB respects the efforts of the former NOSB that led to its 2010 recommendation on 

terrestrial plants in greenhouses.

The NOSB recognizes that the foundation of organic agriculture is based upon a systems 

approach to producing food in the natural environment, which respects the complex dynamic 

interaction between soil, water, air, sunlight, plants and animals needed to produce a thriving 

agro-ecosystem.

At the heart of the organic philosophy is the belief that our responsibilities of good stewardship 

go beyond production of healthy foods and include protection of natural resources, biodiversity 

and the ecosystem services upon which we all depend.

We encourage future NOSB to consider this wider perspective as the board undertakes the 

challenges of assessing and defining innovations in agriculture that may or may not be 

compatible in a system of organic production.

In the case of the hydroponic/bioponic/aquaponic issue, it is the will of the majority of the 

current members of the NOSB to prohibit hydroponic systems that have an entirely water 

based substrate. Although that was the original intent of the proposal before us today, the 

current proposal as structured does not achieve this objective. While the NOSB does not 

believe that the liquid substrate systems should be sold under the USDA organic label, these 

growers deserve the chance to promote their very commendable qualities and objectives in 

their own right.
Rationale Supporting Recommendation (including consistency with OFPA and Organic 

Regulations): 

The NOSB voted to send the proposal on Hydroponics/Bioponics back to Crops Subcommittee 

for further work, but felt it was important to send a message to stakeholders who are affected 

by the outcome of a future recommendation. Therefore, this resolution indicates to future 

boards and stakeholders the direction that the current board would like to see pursued in 

future proposals.

NOSB Vote: 

Motion: to approve the NOSB Resolution above

Motion by: Harriet Behar

Seconded by: Harold V Austin, IV

Yes: 12 No: 0 Abstain: 2 Absent: 1 Recuse: 0

 

Motion Passed