alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 72 (Friday, April 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22347-22348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8936]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Sematech, Inc. d/b/a International Sematech

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 16, 2012, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Sematech, Inc. d/b/a 
International Sematech (``SEMATECH'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Centrotherm Photovoltaics AG, Blaubeuren, 
GERMANY; Fujifilm Holdings Corporation, Tokyo, JAPAN; Inpria 
Corporation, Corvallis, OR; and Invensas Corporation, San Jose, CA, 
have been added as parties to this venture.
    Also, United Microelectronics Corporation, Inc., Hsinchu City, 
TAIWAN; and Asahi Glass Corporation, Chiyodaku, Tokyo, JAPAN, have 
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    In addition, the following have been added as members to 
International SEMATECH Manufacturing Initiative, Inc. (``ISMI''): 
Winbond Electronics Corporation, Taichung City, TAIWAN; Macronix 
International Co. Ltd., Hsinchu, TAIWAN; and Renesas Electronics 
Corporation, Santa Clara, CA.

[[Page 22348]]

    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and SEMATECH intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 22, 1988, SEMATECH filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on May 19, 1988 (53 FR 17987).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 18, 
2011. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on December 21, 2011 (76 FR 79219).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-8936 Filed 4-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-1135

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Mario Holmes

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

 ____________

 Submitted: October 22, 2019

Filed: October 31, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Mario Holmes appeals the district court’s1

 order revoking a grant of conditional

release. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

Holmes was initially civilly committed under 18 U.S.C. § 4246 in 2016. In

February 2018, the district court granted the government’s motion for conditional

release under 18 U.S.C. § 4246(e)(2), and imposed eight conditions, including that he

not commit a new crime. Holmes was subsequently conditionally released, and in

July, the government filed a “Notice of Violation and Request for Warrant,”

requesting his arrest and confinement. The Notice included allegations that Holmes

had robbed a bank.

After careful review of the record, this court concludes the evidence developed

during the revocation proceedings supports the district court’s determination that

revocation and recommitment were warranted. See 18 U.S.C. § 4246(f); United States

v. Franklin, 435 F.3d 885, 889-90 (8th Cir. 2006). 

The judgment is affirmed. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. 

______________________________

1

The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of

Missouri. 

-2-
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos

    Coronavirus Disease 2019

    Air Force Art Collection





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2021

    Focus on Priorities

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    CSAF Leadership Library    
        CSAF Leadership Library Bookshelf

    2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers





    Contact Us  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (7.93 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR ActOSI Tip Line
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit
Order entered December 31, 2021

In The


### Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 01014

- CV

IN RE ROBERT B. READ, JR.

, R elat or

O rigi nal Proceeding from the 366th Judicial District Court

Co llin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366

- 81170

- 06

O RDER

Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Goldstein

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for

writ of mandamus. We DENY AS MOOT his motion seeking leave to file his

petition for writ of mandamus.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00243-CV

ESTATE OF KEVIN MICHAEL GIBSON,

DECEASED

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from Probate Court No. 1

of Tarrant County (2023-PR00912-1)

January 25, 2024

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

prosecution.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
The
      undersigned hereby agrees to be bound as a Guarantor for purposes of the
      Guaranty, dated as of April 6, 2004 (the “ *Guaranty* ”),
      among
      Prestige Brands International, LLC and certain subsidiaries and affiliates
      of
      Prestige Brands, Inc. listed on the signature pages thereof and acknowledged
      by
      Citicorp North America, Inc., as Administrative Agent, and the undersigned
      hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Guaranty. The undersigned hereby
      represents and warrants that each of the representations and warranties
      contained in *Section
      16 (Representations and Warranties; Covenants)* of
      the
      Guaranty applicable to it is true and correct on and as the date hereof as
      if
      made on and as of such date. Capitalized terms used herein but not defined
      herein are used with the meanings given them in the Guaranty.




In
      witness whereof ,
      the
      undersigned has caused this Guaranty Supplement to be duly executed and
      delivered as of December 19, 2006.







PRESTIGE
      BRANDS
      HOLDINGS, INC.


PRESTIGE
      INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS,


LLC







By:/s/ Peter J.
      Anderson


Name:
      Peter J.
      Anderson


Title:
      Chief
      Financial Officer









DENTAL
      CONCEPTS
      LLC




By:
/s/
      Peter J.
      Anderson


Name:
      Peter J.
      Anderson


Title:
      Treasurer








ACKNOLWLEDGED
      AND AGREED


as
      of the
      date first above written:




CITICORP
      NORTH AMERICA, INC.


*as
      Administrative Agent*




By:
      /s/ C.P. Mahon


Name:
      C.P. Mahon


Title:
      Vice President
Exhibit 31.1








I, Susan B. Sheffield, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of GM Financial Automobile Leasing Trust 2022-2  (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Computershare Trust Company, N.A.








By:/s/ Susan B. SheffieldName:Susan B. SheffieldTitle:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:March 3, 2023
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6054
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RONALD SCOTT MARTIN, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-236-S, CA-96-196-4) Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: May 1, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Scott Martin, Appellant Pro Se. John Warren Stone, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed therecord and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Martin , Nos. CR-92-236-S; CA-96-196-4 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 31, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert E. Swanson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Energy L
Fund, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Dated:       March 9, 2007

        /s/  ROBERT E. SWANSON
      Name:  Robert E. Swanson

     Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
             (Principal Executive Officer)
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Christopher Marchel Hill, * From the 142nd District

 Court of Midland County,

 Trial Court No. CR39347.

Vs. No. 11-13-00069-CR * January 15, 2015

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that 

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 30981

LOUIE M. SCHEXNAYDER, JR.,

Petitioner

- Appellant

v.

DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY,

Respondent

- Appellee

Appeal s from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 2:99

- CV

- 93

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and ELROD, Circuit Judges

.
PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the district court is vacated and Petitioner’s Rule 60(b)

motion is remanded to tha t court. Because the federal court has not considered

constitutional claims related to the decisions of the Louisiana courts after the

Louisiana Supreme Court’s judgment in State v. Cordero , 993 So. 2d 203

( La. 2008), the present motion is not successive, but is a true Rule 60(b) motion

entitled to be decided.

Judgment VACATED and Motion REMANDED.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstance s set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
April 13, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-30981 Document: 00513462755 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/13/2016
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of RiskMetrics Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                     The Report,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                     The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Date: November 3,  2009 |     |
|-----------------------------------|----------|
|                              |     |
| /s/ David  M. Obstler        |     |
| David  M. Obstler                 |     |
| *(Principal Financial Officer)*   | * * |

 

----
#### Freedman, a Minor, Appellee, *v.*Freedman et al., Appellants.

(No. 31586

Decided December 15, 1948.)

*539
      *Messrs. Gaines & Rirsch,*for appellee.

*Messrs. Ralle, Haber, Berick é McNulty,*for appellants.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of ¡right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the ■reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, .Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur. .

Turner, J., not participating.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ Freddie M. KotekName:
    
    Freddie M. KotekTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
    
    May 17, 2010
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 456

Recognizing the occasion of the Sixth World Symposium on Choral Music,

to be held August 3–10, 2002, in Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minnesota.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 26, 2002

Ms. MCCOLLUM (for herself, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. LUTHER, Mr. OBERSTAR,

and Mr. SABO) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the occasion of the Sixth World Symposium

on Choral Music, to be held August 3–10, 2002, in

Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minnesota.

Whereas Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minnesota, will host

the Sixth World Symposium on Choral Music, marking

the first time this event has been held in the United

States.

Whereas the Symposium convenes approximately 1,500 delegates from around the world, including members of

prominent choirs, choral specialists, scholars, students,

and music industry representatives for lectures, repertoire reading sessions, and choral concerts;

Whereas the Sixth World Symposium on Choral Music is a

global event of the International Federation for Choral
2

•HCON 456 IH

Music, hosted by the American Choral Directors Association of Minnesota;

Whereas Symposium delegates will study a wide range of choral topics, hear 25 choirs performing music indigenous to

their regions of the world, meet with colleagues from

more than 60 countries, be the first to experience new

choral works by 10 renowned composers, enjoy some of

the finest choral music of Minnesota and the Nation, and

visit an expanded World Choral Expo featuring music industry exhibits;

Whereas a prestigious group of Minnesota business and community leaders have offered their expertise and guidance,

bringing Symposium delegates the finest programs and

hospitality; and

Whereas venues in Minneapolis and Saint Paul, such as Orchestra Hall, Peavey Plaza, the Cathedral of Saint Paul,

the Minneapolis Convention Center, and Westminster

Presbyterian Church, will host the Symposium’s many

concerts and events: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress recognizes the Sixth World

3 Symposium on Choral Music and expresses appreciation

4 for the collaboration of artistic talents and the spirit of

5 cross-cultural understanding that this event will bring to

6 Minnesota and the world.

Æ
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-3945

_____________________________

ANNIE GRAY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Dustin Stephenson, Judge.

February 12, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.