1

September, 28 2015

Attn:

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12

- 140

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

CHRIS SMITH

REQUEST AN EXEMPTION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE CODE

OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS

SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) &

(a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI Phantom

3 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF

THE FAA MODERNIZATI ON AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112

- 95)

Chris Smith

53 Waters Edge Circle

Delaware, Ohio 43015

614

- 900

- 60082 TABLE OF CONTENTS

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS.

................................ ................................ ................. 3

SUMMARY.

................................ ................................ ................................ ......................... 4

INTRODUCT ION AND INTERESTS OF PETITIONER.

................................ ................... 4

BACKGROUND.

................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 4

BASIS FOR PETITION

................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 5

NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER.

................................ ................................ ....... 6 Page

THE SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF 14 C.F.R. FROM WHICH CHRIS SMITH SEEKS

EXEMPTION

................................ ................................ ................................ ........................ 7

THE EX TENT OF RELIEF CHRIS SMITH SEEKS AND THE REASON CHRIS SMITH

SEEKS THE REL IEF...............

................................ ................................ ......................... 10

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING CHRIS SMITH ’S REQUEST WOULD BE IN THE

PUBLIC INTEREST

.......... ................................ ................................ ................................ 12

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE EXEMPTION TO CHRIS SMITH WOULD NO T

ADVERSELY AFFECT SAFETY.

................................ ................................ ..................... 14

SUMMARY THAT CAN BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER.

.................. 25

ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, VIEWS, OR ARGUMENTS AVAILABLE TO

SUPPORT CHRIS SMITH ’S R EQUEST...

................................ ................................ ....... 25

CONCLUSION.

................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 25

APPE NDICES...............................................................

. ......................... 263 GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS

AGL Above Ground Level

AOI Area of Interest

ATC Air Traffic Control

ATO Air Traffic Organization

AV Aerial Vehicle

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

COA Certificate of Authorization

FAA Federal Aviation Administration

FAR Federal Aviation R egulation

GCS Ground Control Station

GPS Global Positioning System

LOL Loss of Link

NAS National Airspace System

NOTAM Notice to Airman

PIC Pilot In Command

Section 333 FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA)

SO Safety Observer

SOP Standard Operati ng Procedures

UA Unmanned Aircraft

UAS Unmanned Aircraft System

VFR Visual Flight Rules

VLOS Visual Line of Site

VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions

VTOL Vertical Takeoff and Landing4 SUMMARY

CHRIS SMITH seeks exe mption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a),

91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to

operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (DJI Phantom 3) pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA). This exemption will permit CHRIS SMITH to

operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial

video and photography of construction sites, residential and commercia l real estate, civil

landscapes and events over certain areas of the United States.

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER

CHRIS SMITH has for over fifteen years flying and building R / C aircraft with the past six years

devoted primarily to UAS. I have a perfect safety recor d with over 100 hours on the DJI Phantom

3. F o r several years I have provided free services relates to aerial photography and videography

. I wish to expand on this and offer professional services at cost to customers. I also wish to expand

into assisting local law enforcement and Fire Departments in relation to search and rescue. In the

past I have supplied clients aerial video and photography using commercial aircraft. The objective

of CHRIS SMITH and my Unmanned Aircraft System (DJI Phantom 3) aerial operations is to

provide a more affordable, high

- quality production system for a variety of governmental,

commercial, public, and residential uses, specifically targeting

• Construction sites before and after

• Appraisals

• Real

- estate m arketing

• Economic development

• Civic landmarks

• Special event coverage

• Private and governmental training

BACKGROUND

Unmanned Aircraft Systems: DJI Phantom 3, UAS

CHRIS SMITH seeks an exemption to operate DJI Phantom 3 system for compensation or hire

within the NAS. The DJI Phantom 3 is vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) Unmanned Aircraft

(UA) with a Ground Control Station (GCS) utilizing e lectronic tablet or smart phone systems.

The DJI Phantom 3 has a maximum gross weight of approximately 2.8 lb. while having a

diagonal dimension of 23.2” , a maximum speed of approximately 16.4’fps and a maximum flying

height of 400'. The DJI Phantom 3 is e quipped with four main rotors; driven by Lithium Polymer

battery powered electric motors.5

The DJI Phantom 3 that will be operated by CHRIS SMITH will be registered in accordance with

49 U.S.C. 44103, Registration of Aircraft , as well as 14 C.F.R Part 47, Aircraft Registration

, and

marked in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 45, Identification and Registration Marking

.

BASIS FOR PETITION

Petitioner, CHRIS SMITH , pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14

C.F.R. § 11.61) and th e FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), Section 333,

Special Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems , hereby petitions the Administrator to

commercially operate the DJI Phantom 3, UAS in the National Airspace System (NAS), and for

an exempti on from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b),

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

In consideration of the speed, weight, size, and limited operating area associated with the

unmanned a ircraft and its operation, CHRIS SMITH operation s of DJI Phantom 3 UAS meets the

conditions of FMRA Section 333 and therefore, will not require an airworthiness certificate in

accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H.

Accordingly, CHRIS SMITH re quests relief from Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1)

& (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirements for maintenance that only

apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate.

CHRIS SMITH submits that the reques ted relief is proper since an equivalent level of safety will

be ensured. CHRIS SMITH will use experienced personnel or technicians to perform maintenance,

alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices

p rescribed in the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3

Instruction Manual). Furthermore, CHRIS SMITH will document and maintain all maintenance

records for the DJI Phantom 3 UAS.

Relief from certain requirements of Secti on 61.113(a) and (b), entitled Private pilot privileges

and limitations: Pilot in command

, is requested by CHRIS SMITH to the extent necessary to

allow a Pilot in Command (PIC) holding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as well as an

airman m edical certificate, and who has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour and

currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom UAS in a manner

consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and ma intaining

appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

CHRIS SMITH seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness

, because

the DJI Phantom 3 UAS do not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14

C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. As such, CHRIS SMITH submits that he will ensure that the DJI

Phantom 3 UAS is in an airworthy condition, prior to every flight, by determining that the UAS

are in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Mon thly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom

3 Instruction Manual), and that the aircraft are in a condition for safe flight.6

CHRIS SMI TH also seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.121, entitled

Altimeter Settings , as the DJI Phantom 3 UAS w ill not have a typical barometric altimeter onboard.

However, altitude information of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be provided to the PIC via Global

Positioning System (GPS) equipment and radio communications telemetry data link, which

downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path. This altitude

information, combined with CHRIS SMITH ’s operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS within visual

line of sight, at or below 400 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section

91 .121.

Additionally, CHRIS SMITH seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.151(b),

entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions

. CHRIS SMITH submits that safety will

not be affected by operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS durin g daylight hours in visual

meteorological conditions (VMC) under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to

fly for a total duration of approximately 23 minutes. Battery power indicators are also able to

show exactly how much battery power is left, as well as how much time is needed to return

safely back to point of take o ff

.

In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, CHRIS SMITH provides the following information in

support of its petition for exemption:

A. Name And Address Of The Petitioner.

The name and address of the Petitioner and point of contact is:

CHRIS SMITH

53 Waters Edge Circle

Delaware Ohio, 43015

614

- 900

- 6008

The Specific Sections Of 14 C.F.R. From

Which CHRIS SMITH Seeks Exemption.

1. CHRIS SMITH Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And

(b).

Section 61.113, entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command

, subsections (a) and (b) prescribe the following, in relevant part:

(a) No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command

(PIC) of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire;

nor may that person, for compensation or hir e, act as PIC of an aircraft.

(b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in7 connection with any business or employment if

—

(1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and

(2) The aircraft does not carry passenger s or property for compensation or hire.

2. CHRIS SMITH Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a).

Section 91.7, entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness , subsection (a), states the following:

(a) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless i t is in an airworthy condition.

3. CHRIS SMITH Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121.

Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, subsection (a), states the following, in part:

(a) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruisi ng altitude or flight level

of that aircraft, as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set, when

operating

--

(1) Below 18,000 feet MSL, to

--

(i) The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and within

100 nautical miles of t he aircraft;

(ii) If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of

this section, the current reported altimeter setting of an appropriate available

station; or

(iii) In the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of the

departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.8

4. CHRIS SMITH Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b).

Section 91.151, entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions

, subsection

(b), states the following:

(b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless

(considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the

first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly af ter that

for at least 20 minutes.

5. CHRIS SMITH Seeks Exemption From The Requirement Of Section 91.405(a).

Section 91.405, entitled Maintenance required , subsection (a), states the following: Each

owner or operator of an aircraft

—

(a) Shall have that aircraf t inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall

between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section,

have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter[.]

6. CHRIS SMITH Seeks Exemption From Th e Requirements Of Section 91.407(a)(1)

Section 91.407, entitled Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance,

rebuilding, or alteration , subsection (a)(1), states the following:

(a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance, prev entive

maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless

--

(1) It has been approved for return to service by a person authorized under § 43.7

of this chapter[.]

7. CHRIS SMITH Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.409(a)(1)

And 91.409(a)(2).

Sectio n 91.409, entitled Inspections , subsection (a), states the following:

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate an

aircraft unless, within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had

--

(1) An annual inspection in accordance w ith part 43 of this chapter and has been

approved for return to service by a person authorized by § 43.7 of this chapter; or

(2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in accordance

with part 21 of this chapter.9

8. CHRIS SMITH Seeks E xemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.417(a) And

91.417(b).

Section 91.417, entitled Maintenance records , subsections (a) and (b), state the

following:

(a) Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91.413, each

registered owner or oper ator shall keep the following records for the periods specified

in paragraph (b) of this section:

(1) Records of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration and

records of the 100

- hour, annual, progressive, and other required or approved

inspection s, as appropriate, for each aircraft (including the airframe) and each

engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance of an aircraft. The records must include

--

(i) A description (or reference to data acceptable to the Administrator) of the

work performed; and

(ii) The da te of completion of the work performed; and

(iii) The signature, and certificate number of the person approving the aircraft

for return to service.

(2) Records containing the following information:

(i) The total time in service of the airframe, each engine, each propell er, and

each rotor.

(ii) The current status of life

- limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller,

rotor, and appliance.

(iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft which

are required to be overhauled on a specified time basis.

(iv) The c urrent inspection status of the aircraft, including the time since the

last inspection required by the inspection program under which the aircraft and

its appliances are maintained.

(v) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) and safety

directives including, for each, the method of compliance, the AD or safety

directive number and revision date. If the AD or safety directive involves

recurring action, the time and date when the next action is required.

(vi) Copies of the forms prescribed by § 43.9(d) of this chapter for each

major alteration to the airframe and currently installed engines, rotors,

propellers, and appliances.10 (b) The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the periods

prescribed:

(1) The records specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be retained until

the work is repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 year after the work is

performed.

(2) The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be retained and

transferred with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold.

(3) A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 43.11 of

this chapter shall be retained until the defects are repaired and the aircraft is

approved for return to service.

B. The Extent Of Relief CHRIS SMITH Seeks And The Reason CHRIS SMITH Seeks The

Relief.

1. Extent Of Relief CHRIS SMITH Seeks And The Reason CHRIS SMITH Seeks Relief

From Section 61.113(a) And (b).

Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) entitled Private pilot privileges and limitat ions: Pilot in

command

, is requested to the extent necessary to allow a PIC holding a private pilot or higher

level certificate, as well as a current and valid airman medical certificate, and who has met certain

flight

- hour and currency requirements, to co nduct the proposed UAS flight operations for

compensation or hire.

This relief is requested since the limitations set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b) state that a

private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any

business or employment if: (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

As set forth more fully below, CHRIS SMITH submits that an equivalen t level of safety will be

maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC

has met certain flight

- hour and currency requirements, demonstrating that the PIC is able to

safely operate either the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent with the operations

specifications as described in this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers, as well

as maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

Further, CHRIS SMITH submits that all flights of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, conducted by the

PIC pursuant to the grant of this Petition: (1) will be incidental to CHRIS SMITH ’s business; and

(2) will not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.11

2. Extent Of Relief CHRIS SMITH Seeks And The Reason CHRIS SMITH Seeks Relief

From Section 91.7(a).

Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness , is requested to the extent required

to allow CHRIS SMITH to determine that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are in a irworthy condition

prior to every flight by ensuring that the UAS is in compliance with the operating documents

(i.e., C HRIS SMITH Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom

3 Instruction Manual).

CHRIS SMITH seeks the reque sted relief because the DJI Phantom 3 UAS do not require an

airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Therefore, CHRIS

SMITH will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are in airworthy condition based upon its

compliance wi th the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3)

prior to every flight, and further, determine that the aircraft are in condition for safe flight, as stated

in the conditions and limitations below.

3. Extent Of Relief CHRIS SMITH Seeks And The Reason CHRIS SMITH Seeks Relief

From Section 91.121.

Relief from Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings , may be required to allow flight operations

of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, which utilize a barometric pressure sensor, GPS equip ment, and a

radio communications telemetry data link to downlink altitude information from the UA to the

PIC at the ground control station (GCS). Since the FAA requires that any altitude information

concerning UAS operations be reported to air traffic cont rol (ATC) in feet above ground level

(AGL), CHRIS SMITH seeks the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 3 UA’s altimeter may

be set on the ground to zero feet AGL, rather than the local barometric pressure or field altitude,

before each flight.

Cons idering the limited altitude of the proposed operations, relief from 14 CFR 91.121 is sought

to the extent necessary to comply with the applicable conditions and limitations stated below. As

more fully set forth herein, an equivalent level of safety will b e maintained since the DJI Phantom

3 UAS are equipped with a barometric pressure sensor and GPS equipment, which

automatically ensures that a ground level pressure setting will be established prior to each flight,

and provides the PIC with altitude inform ation of the UA on the heads

- up display of the GCS.

4. Extent Of Relief CHRIS SMITH Seeks And The Reason CHRIS SMITH Seeks Relief

From Section 91.151(b).

Relief from Section 91.151(b) entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, is reque sted

to the extent required to allow flights of the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS during daylight

hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), for a total

duration of 23 minutes. CHRIS SMITH seeks the requested relief because without an

exemption from Section 91.151(b), the flight time duration of the12

battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS will severely constrain the practicality of any aerial video

or still photo flight operations that CHRIS SMITH proposes to co nduct pursuant to this Petition.

Significantly, as set forth below, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, the DJI

Phantom 3 operating documents, and CHRIS SMITH ’s proposed operating limitations, ensure

that CHRIS SMITH will safely operate the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS during daylight

hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough

battery power to fly for a total duration of 23 minutes.

5. Extent Of Relief CHRIS SMITH Seeks A nd The Reason CHRIS SMITH Seeks Relief

From Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b).

Since Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) only apply to

aircraft with an airworthiness ce rtificate, CHRIS SMITH requests relief from these Sections

because the DJI Phantom 3 UAS do not require airworthiness certificates. As set forth more fully

below, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS meet the conditions of FMRA Section 333 for operation without

an ai rworthiness certificate. Accordingly, CHRIS SMITH will use trained technicians to perform

maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques,

and practices prescribed in the UAS operating documents (i.e., the Monthly Maintenance Log,

the “ B4UFLY ” mobile app, knowbeforeyoufly.org, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual).

Furthermore, CHRIS SMITH will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI

Phantom 3 UAS.

C. The Reasons Why Granting CHRIS SMITH R equest Would Be In The Public Interest;

That Is, How It Would Benefit The Public As A Whole.

Granting the present Petition will further the public interest by allowing CHRIS SMITH to

safely, efficiently, and economically perform aerial video and photog raphy of construction sites,

real estate, events and civic landscape over certain areas of the United States.

Additionally, use of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will decrease congestion of the NAS, reduce

pollution, and provide significant benefits to the economy. Notably, the benefits of CHRIS

SMITH ’s proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be realized without implicating

any privacy issues.

1. The Public Will Benefit From Decreased Congestion Of The NAS.

The DJI Phantom 3 UAS are battery powered and serve as a safe, efficient, and economical

alternative to the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain aerial imagery. By reducing the13

amount of manned aircraft needed to perform aerial acquisitions, an exemption allowing the use

of a DJI Phant om 3 UAS would reduce the amount of manned aircraft in the NAS, reduce noise

and air pollution, as well as increase the safety of life and property in the air and on the ground.

Furthermore, by reducing the number of manned aircraft operating in the NAS, congestion around

airports caused by arriving and departing aircraft will be reduced. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS do

not require an airport to takeoff or land. Likewise, a reduction of manned aircraft conducting aerial

video and photography missions would result in fewer aircraft that must be handled by air

traffic control during the ground, takeoff, departure, arrival, and landing phases of flight

operations.

2. The Public Will Benefit From The Safety And Efficiency Of The DJI Phantom 3 UAS.

Conducting aerial acq uisitions with the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, instead of manned aircraft, will

greatly benefit the public by drastically reducing the levels of air and noise pollution generated

during traditional aerial video and still photography flight operations. By using batt ery power

and electric motors, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS produce no air pollution, and is the most viable

environmentally conscious alternative to the cabin class, six cylinder internal combustion engine

aircraft that are typically utilized for aerial video an d photography, while burning approximately

20

- 30 gallons per hour of leaded aviation fuel. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS, while reducing the

carbon footprint of aerial acquisitions, also eliminates noise pollution, as the UAS are propelled

by battery powered elect ric motors, rather than an internal combustion engine.

By using the DJI Phantom 3 UAS to perform aerial acquisitions, the substantial risk to life and

property in the air and on the ground, which is usually associated with traditional manned aircraft

fligh t operations, will be substantially reduced or completely eliminated. Aside from the lack of

flight crew members located onboard the aircraft, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS (weighing

approximately 2.8 pounds at their maximum gross weight with diagonal dimension of 23.2 inches,

and with no fuel on board), has less physical potential for collateral damage to life and property

on the ground, and in the air, compared to the manned aircraft that typically conduct similar

operations (weighing approximately 6,000 pounds w ith a wingspan of approximately 42 feet, a

length of 34 feet, and a fuel capacity of 180 gallons).

3. Performing Aerial Video and Photography Operations With The DJI Phantom 3 UAS

Will Benefit The Economy.

In addition to being safe and efficient, the DJI P hantom 3 UAS are also an economical alternative

to using manned aircraft to conduct similar aerial operations. As such, operation of the DJI

Phantom 3 UAS will allow United States based companies to remain competitive and contribute

to growth of the U.S. economy. Specifically, with the rising cost of aviation fuel and the

Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulatory actions phasing out leaded aviation fuels,

U.S. owned and operated companies must adopt new and alternative techn ology in order to remain

competitive. Operating the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS is one such technology that

not only allows companies greater operational14

flexibility compared to manned aircraft, but provides such flexibility without the h igh operational

cost of a traditional manned aircraft.

By operating the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, persons such as CHRIS SMITH

, can remain competitive

and profitable, and therefore, provide greater job stability to employees and contractors, which

will ultim ately contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Improved financial performance of U.S.

companies, through commercial use of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, provides a stable workforce that

increases consumer spending; improves local, state, and federal tax revenues ; and allows

companies to invest in research and development in order to remain competitive both in the United

States and abroad.

4. There Are No Privacy Issues.

Similar to the manned aerial acquisition flight operations that have been conducted for deca des,

CHRI S SMITH ’s proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will not implicate any privacy

issues. Specifically, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be operated only in compliance with

operating documents (i.e., The “ B4UFLY ” mobile app, knowbeforeyoufly.org, Mont hly

Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual) which requires property owner

involvement as well as local law enforcement notification, and in accordance with the Federal

Aviation Regulations, including the minimum altitude requirement s of 14

C.F.R. § 91.119.

D. The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption Would Not Adversely Affect Safety, Or

How The Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal To That Provided

By The Rule From Which CHRIS SMITH Seeks Exemption.

1. Reasons Why The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Meet The Conditions Of The FAA Modernization

and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333.

In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the

unmanned aircraft and its operation, CHRIS SMITH ’s op eration of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS meet

the conditions of FMRA Section 333, and will not require an airworthiness certificate in

accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H.

Section 333 provides authority for a UAS to operate without airworthiness certifica tion and sets

forth requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the

public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security. Specifically, FMRA Section 333 states the

following, in part:

(a) In General.

-- Notwithstandi ng any other requirement of this subtitle, and not later

than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation

shall determine if certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national

airspace system before c ompletion of the plan and rulemaking required by section

332 of this Act or the guidance required by section 334 of this Act.15 (b) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

-- In making the determination under

subsection (a), the Secretary shall determine, at a m inimum

--

(1) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size,

weight, speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and populated

areas, and operation within visual line of sight do not create a hazard to users

of the nationa l airspace system or the public or pose a threat to national

security; and

(2) Whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or

airworthiness certification under section 44704 of title 49, United States Code,

is required for the operation of u nmanned aircraft systems identified under

paragraph (1).

(c) Requirements for Safe Operation.

-- If the Secretary determines under this section

that certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace

system, the Secretary shall establi sh requirements for the safe operation of such

aircraft systems in the national airspace system.

In seeking this exemption, CHRIS SMITH submits that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS can operate

safely in the NAS pursuant to FMRA Section 333, as demonstrated by: ( a) the characteristics

of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS; (b) the pilot certification requirement; and (c) the specific operating

limitations.

a. The Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Demonstrate Its Safe Characteristics.

The DJI Phantom 3 UAS does not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise

pose a threat to national security considering its size, weight, speed, and operational capability.

i. Technical Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 3 UAS.

The technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are set forth by the DJI Phantom 3 User

Manual, attached hereto as Appendix A.

ii. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Global Positioning Modes Enable The UAS To Remain

Within A Defined Operational Area.

The DJI Phantom 3 UAS may be operated in both manual and global po sitioning flight modes. A

complete description of the flight and navigational modes of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is provided

at pages 11 of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual attached hereto as Appendix A.

iii. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Are Designed For Automatic Return To Home Point

Or Hover In The Event Of Loss Of The Control Link Or Navigation.

When the Control Link is lost, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will remain stationary, in flight, for 3

seconds or more. If, after 3 seconds, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS does not reacquire control link data

from the GCS, the UAS will assume that the Control Link is lost and the will return to the home

position (i.e., failsafe mode) via GPS, and will descend to the takeoff position and shutdown.16

A complete description of the Failsafe Functions of t he DJI Phantom 3 UAS are set forth at pages

12 through 14 of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual, attached hereto as Appendix A.

iv. The DJI Phantom 3 GCS And Its Operation.

A complete description of the operation and specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 GCS and fli ght

control software is provided at pages 23 through 29 of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual. DJI

Phantom 3 User Manual is attached hereto as Appendix A.

b. Flight Operations Of DJI Phantom 3 UAS Is Limited To The Line Of Sight Of A

Certificated Pilot in Command With A Safety Observer.

CHRIS SMITH video production staff will be the only persons to act as a pilot in command (PIC)

of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS. Additionally, a safety observer will assist him at all times during flight

time.

c. Flights Of DJI Phantom 3 U AS Will Be Conducted Pursuant To Specific Operating

Limitations.

In seeking this exemption, CHRIS SMITH proposes to commercially operate DJI Phantom 3 UAS

for the special purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of United

S tates, pursuant to the following specific operating limitations.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption will be limited to the following

aircraft described in the operating documents, rotorcraft UAS weighing less than 55

pounds maximum gross weig ht: DJI Phantom 3 Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Proposed

operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this

grant.

2. UAS operations under this exemption will be limited to conducting operations for

the purpose of aerial video and photography.

3. The UAS may not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 20 knots.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level

(AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the operating documents unles s a

special request is made and approved by ATC. All altitudes reported to ATC must be

in feet AGL.

5. The UAS must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all

times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any dev ice

other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA

- issued airman medical

certificate.

6. The use of first person view (FPV) by the PIC or safety observer (SO) is not

permitted.17 7. All operations must utilize a safety observer (SO). The SO may be us ed to satisfy

the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The SO

and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times. Electronic messaging or

texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before

the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration of the flight. The

PIC must ensure that the SO can perform the functions prescribed in the operating

documents.

8. The SO must not perform any other duties beyond assisting the PIC with seeing and

avoiding other air traffic and other ground based obstacles/obstructions and is not

permitted to operate the camera or other instruments.

9. The operating documents and the grant of exemption must be accessible during UAS

operations and made a vailable to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists

between the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption and the

procedures outlined in the operating documents, the conditions and limitations

contained in the grant of exemption take precedence and must be followed. Otherwise,

the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating documents. The

operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility

to track such revisio ns and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator

upon request. The operator must also present updated and revised documents if it

petitions for extension or amendment to the grant of exemption. If the operator

determines that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA

granted the exemption, then the operator must petition for amendment to its grant of

exemption. The FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS

- 80) may be contacted if

questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents.

10. Prior to each flight the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition

for safe flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of

the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has

been performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The Ground

Control Station must be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and

alterations must be properly documented in the aircra ft records.

11. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS

operation or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component,

must undergo a functional test flight. The PIC who conducts the functional test flig ht

must make an entry in the aircraft records.

12. The pre

- flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g.

inoperable components, items, or equipment, not already covered in the relevant

sections of the operating documents.

13. The operator mu st follow the UAS manufacturer’s aircraft/component,

maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements.18 14. The operator must carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record keeping

requirements, in accordance with the operating d ocuments. Maintenance, inspection,

alterations, and status of replacement/overhaul component parts must be noted in the

aircraft records, including total time in service, description of work accomplished,

and the signature of the authorized person returnin g the UAS to service.

15. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer

Safety Bulletins.

16. The authorized person must make an entry in the aircraft record of the corrective

action taken against discrepancies discovered between inspect ions.

17. The PIC must possess at least a private pilot certificate and at least a current third

class medical certificate.

18. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC meets the

operator’s qualification criteria and demonstrates the ability to safely operate t h e UAS

in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under the exemption,

including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances

from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification fligh t hours must be

logged in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of

training the operator’s PICs are permitted under the terms of the exemption . However,

training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During

training, proficiency, and experience

- building flights, all persons not essential for flight

operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with

appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14

C. F.R. § 91.119.

19. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 C.F.R. § 1.1.

All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). If

flight at night is required, a special request will be made at the FAA office closest to

proposed area of operations. Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not

authorized.

20. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point as

denoted on a current FAA

- published aeronautical chart unless a lett er of agreement

with that airport’s management is obtained, and the operation is conducted in

accordance with a NOTAM as required by the operator’s COA. The letter of agreement

with the airport management must be made available to the Administrator upon

re quest.

21. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

22. If the UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it must return to a pre

dete rmined location within the planned operating area and land or be recovered in

accordance with the operating documents.19 23. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies

in accordance with the operating documents.

24. The PIC i s prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and

forecast weather conditions) there is enough power to fly at normal cruising speed to

the intended landing point and land the UA with 25% battery power remaining.

25. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued Certificate of

Waiver or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under the grant of

exemption. This COA will also require the operator to request a Notice to Airman

(NOTAM) not more than 72 hours in adv ance, but not less than 48 hours prior to the

operation. All operations shall be conducted in accordance with airspace requirements

in the ATO issued COA including class of airspace, altitude level and potential

transponder requirements.

26. All aircraft opera ted in accordance with the exemption must be identified by serial

number, registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 47, and have identification (N

Number) markings in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 45, Subpart C. Markings must

be as large as practicabl e.

27. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation

and control of the UA must comply with the Federal Communications Commission

(FCC) or other appropriate government oversight agency requirements.

28. The documents required fewer than 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.203 must be available

to the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the UAS is operating.

These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement

official upon request.

29. The UA must remain clear and yield the right of way to all manned aviation

operations and activities at all times.

30. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

31. Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating

perso ns (persons other than the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons), vessels,

vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating

persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accide nt. The operator

must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a

situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are

within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately and/or;

b. The airc raft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where the

owner/controller of such vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission

and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to

those objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard, and;20 c. Operations nearer to the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons do

not present an undue hazard to those persons per § 91.119(a).

32. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled

- access property with

permission from the land owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission

from land owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight

to be conducted.

33. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported

to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS

- 80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be

reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per ins tructions

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov.

2. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b)

Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

CHRIS SMITH submits that the equivalent lev el of safety established by Section 61.113(a) and

(b) will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom

3 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour and currency

requirements, that the PIC is able to saf ely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent

with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate

distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

Considering CHRIS SMITH ’s proposed area of opera tions, and the operating limitations set

forth

- above; the parallel nature of private pilot aeronautical knowledge requirements to those of

commercial pilot requirements ( See Exemption No. 11062); and the airmanship skills necessary

to safely operate the DJ I Phantom 3 UAS, CHRIS SMITH submits that the additional manned

airmanship experience of a commercially certificated pilot would not correlate to the airmanship

skills necessary for CHRIS SMITH ’s specific proposed flight operations.

The FAA has pre viously granted relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) specific to UAS, in

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos.

11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11 150,

11153, 11156, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

CHRIS SMITH will not allow any PIC to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has

demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour requirements or the DJI Phantom 3 UAS training

and currency requirement s, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a

manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and

maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

Specifically, the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. §

61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot (with a minimum of 20 hours of those21

hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operatio ns under

the exemption). In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 15 takeoffs and

landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes).

As in Exemption Nos. 11062, 11138, and 11153, prior documented flight experience that was

obtai ned in compliance with applicable regulations will ensure an equivalent level of safety

during CHRIS SMITH ’s proposed operations. The Administrator has held that prior documented

flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulat ions would ensure safe

operations, stating as follows:

In Exemption No. 11062, the FAA required that prior to conducting operations for the

purpose of motion picture filming (or similar operations), the PIC must have accumulated

and logged, in a manner con sistent with 14 CFR 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS

rotorcraft pilot including at least 10 hours logged as a UAS pilot with a multi

- rotor UAS.

Prior to operations under Exemption No. 11062, the PIC must also have accumulated and

logged a minimum of 5 hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS

to be used for operations under the exemption. For clarification, the FAA considers these

minimum hour requirements to be inclusive rather than additive; i.e. 5 hours make and

model time m ay be included in the 10 hours of multi

- rotor time and the 10 hours may be

included in the total 25 hours of UAS rotorcraft time. In addition to the hour requirements,

the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency

p urposes). The FAA finds that at a minimum, the flight

- hour requirements in Exemption

No. 11062 are appropriate to practice and build proficiency in the skills necessary to safely

conduct the petitioner’s proposed operations. The FAA also finds that prior d ocumented

flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would satisfy

this requirement. Training, proficiency, and experience

- building flights can also be

conducted under the grant of exemption to accomplish the required fli ght time. During

training, proficiency, and experience

- building flights the PIC is required to operate the UA

with appropriate distances in accordance with 14 C.F.R 91.119.

Exemption No. 11138 at page 15.

Accordingly, CHRIS SMITH will ensure safe op erations by not allowing any PIC to operate the

DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour and

currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner

consistent with the exemp tion, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining

appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

3. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a) Would Not

Adversely Affect Safety.22

The equivalent leve l of safety established by Section 91.7(a) will be maintained because prior to

every flight, CHRIS SMITH will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS is in an airworthy

condition based upon the UAS’s compliance with its operating documents and as stated in

t he conditions and limitations herein.

Additionally, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.7(a) specific to UAS, in

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos.

11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 1 1066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150,

11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

4. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121 Would Not

Adversely Affect Safety.

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.121 will be maintained because the

altitude information of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be provided to the PIC via GPS equipment

and a radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for

active monitoring of th e flight path and altitude. This altitude information, combined with

CHRIS SMITH ’s operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS within visual line of sight, at or below

500 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. The altitude inform ation

will be generated by GPS equipment installed onboard the aircraft. Prior to each flight, a zero

altitude initiation point is automatically established by the UAS at ground level.

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.121 specific to U AS, in circumstances

similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063,

11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157,

11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

5. Reasons Why An Ex emption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b) Would Not

Adversely Affect Safety.

A grant of this exemption would ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R.

Section 91.151(b) as a result of (1) the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS; (2)

the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and (3) the location of the proposed flight

operations. Accordingly, CHRIS SMITH will ensure that it will safely operate the battery powered

DJI Phantom 3 UAS during daylight hours in VFR conditions, with enough battery power to

fly for a total duration of 23 minutes.

Here, as in Exemption No. 11109, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS; the

limitations on the proposed flight operations; and the location of the propo sed operations, will

ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b). Furthermore,

safety will be ensured as the DJI Phantom 3 UAS provide audible and visual warnings to the PIC

at the GCS when the UAS experiences low batter y voltage, the first warning occurring at

approximately 33% remaining battery power, and again at approximately 10% remaining battery23

power. At the critically low battery level, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will descend and land

automatically.

Significantly, pre vious exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Section 91.151 establish that

safety is not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the

UAS are considered. Relief has been granted for manned aircraft to operate at less than the

minimums prescribed in Section 91.151, including Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and 10650.

Moreover, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.151 specific to UAS, in

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos.

8811, 10808, 10673, 11042, 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110,

11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

6. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.405(a),

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

In seeking this exemption, CHRIS SMITH submits that the equivalent level of safety with regard

to the regulatory maintenance and alter ation requirements established by Sections 91.405(a),

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) will be met because CHRIS SMITH will

use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the

UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e.,

the “ B4UFLY ” mobile app, knowbeforeyoufly.org, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom

3 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, CHRIS SMITH will document and maintain all maint enance

records for the DJI Phantom 3 UAS.

Since the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be inspected as prescribed by the operating documents, CHRIS

SMITH will maintain the equivalent level of safety established by Sections 91.405(a),

91.409(a)(1), and 91.409(a)(2) . A copy of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manuals are attached hereto as

Appendix A and B; a copy of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS Maintenance LOG is attached hereto as

Appendix C.

Likewise, the exemption sought will not adversely affect safety because CHRIS SMITH wi ll

use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations or preventive maintenance on the

UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed by the operating documents.

Furthermore, the exemption sought would maintain an equivalent level of safety established by

Sections 91.407, 91.417(a) and 91.417(b), because all maintenance of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS

will be performed by trained technicians. Maintenance will be documented and maintained

utilizing the monthly maintenance log.

Significantly, p revious exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Sections 91.405(a),

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) establish that safety is not adversely

affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are consid ered.24

In consideration of CHRIS S MITH ’s proposed operating limitations, the operating documents, and

the technical aspects of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, CHRIS SMITH submits that safety will not be

adversely affected by granting exemption from 14 C.F.R

. Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1) and

(a)(2), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b). The FAA has previously granted relief specific to UAS

in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein ( e.g. Exemption Nos

. 11062 , 11063 , 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080,

11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160,

11161).

7. The FAA May Prescribe Any Other Conditions For Safe Operation.

In accordance with Section 333 of the FAA Modern ization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA)

and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16 entitled Special Conditions

, CHRIS SMITH requests that the FAA

prescribe special conditions for the intended operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, which

contain such safety standards that the Ad ministrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety

equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a)

& (b), 91.7 (a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a)

& (b). Such special conditions will permit safe operation of the UAS for the limited purpose of

conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States for compensation

or hire. FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create

a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and

further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification in

accordance with any requirements that must be established for the safe operation of the UAS in

the NAS.

Likewise, the Administrator may prescribe special conditions pursuant to 14 C.F.R.

§ 21.16, for operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, since the airworthiness regulations of 14

C.F.R. Part 21 do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards, due to the novel or

unusual design features of the aircraft. Section 21.16, entitled Special Conditions, states the

following:

If the FAA finds that the airworthiness regulations of thi s subchapter do not contain

adequate or appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller

because of a novel or unusual design feature of the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller,

he prescribes special conditions and amendments thereto for the product. The special

conditions are issued in accordance with Part 11 of this chapter and contain such safety

standards for the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller as the FAA finds necessary to

establish a level of safety equivalent to t hat established in the regulations.

See 14 C.F.R. § 21.16.

Therefore, in accordance with FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, the FAA may prescribe

special conditions for Leading Edge’s intended operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, which

contain such sa fety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety

equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R Sections25

61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and

91.417(a) & (b).

• A Summary That Can Be Published In The Federal Register, stating: The

Rules From Which CHRIS SMITH Seeks Exemption:

CHRIS SMITH seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections

61.113(a)&(b), 91.7(a), 91 .121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) &

(a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

A Brief Description Of The Nature Of The Exemption CHRIS SMITH Seeks:

This exemption will permit CHRIS SMITH to commercially operate an Unmanned Aircraft

System (UAS) for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain

areas of the United States.

• Any Additional Information, Views, Or Arguments Available To Support

CHRIS SMITH ’s Request.

This Petition is made pursuant to the FAA Modernizat ion and Reform Act of 2012

(FMRA) Section 333, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to determine if certain UAS

may operate safely in the NAS. As such, CHRIS SMITH ’s request for exemption may be granted

pursuant to the authority of FMRA Sectio n 333 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, as set forth above.

FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a

hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and

further, provides the a uthority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification.

As discussed in detail above, CHRIS SMITH will operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS safely in the

NAS, without creating a hazard to users of the NAS, or the public, or otherwise pose a

thr eat to national security.

CONCLUSION

As set forth herein, CHRIS SMITH seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §

11.61 and Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), which will

permit safe operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS com mercially, without an airworthiness

certificate, for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas

of the United States. By granting this Petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the

Congressional mandate of th e FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, while also advancing

the interests of the public, by allowing CHRIS SMITH to safely, efficiently, and economically

operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS commercially within the NAS.26

WHEREFORE , in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, CHRIS SMITH respectfully

requests that the Administrator grant this Petition for an exemption from the requirements

of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b ), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a),

91.407(a)(1),

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and permit Leading Edge to operate the DJI

Phantom 3 UAS commercially for the purpose of conducting aerial video and

photography over certain ar eas of the United States.

Dated: June 10,

2015

Respectfully

submitted,

CHRIS SMITH

53 Waters Edge Circle

Delaware, Ohio 43015

Smithc@insight.rr.com

Appendices :

A

– Link to DJI Phantom 3 Manual: Click on link below

http://download.dji

innovations.com/download s/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional_User_Manual_v1.2_

en.pdf