alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Wanda F. HICKENBOTTOM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles E. SCHMIDT, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 80CA0442.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.

Feb. 26, 1981.

Donald K. Smith and Terry E. Turner, Sterling, for plaintiff-appellant.

Fortune & Lawritson, Lowell Fortune, Denver, for defendant-appellee.

PIERCE, Judge.

In this personal injury action, plaintiff, Wanda Hickenbottom, appeals from an amended judgment in favor of defendant, Charles E. Schmidt. We reverse.

After a trial to the jury, plaintiff’s damages due to defendant’s negligence were calculated to be $10,000. After deducting the percentage of plaintiff’s comparative negligence from the total amount of damages, the trial court entered judgment in favor of plaintiff for $7,500. However, because plaintiff had received $9,802.35 in personal injury protection (P.I.P.) benefits for medical expenses and loss of income, the court amended the judgment in favor of defendant.

Plaintiff contends that § 10 — 4-717, C.R.S. 1973 (1979 Cum.Supp.) prohibits setting off *727the P.I.P. payments received by her against the damages awarded to her. We disagree.

Section 10-4-717, C.R.S.1973 (1979 Cum. Supp.), applies to actions by or between insurance companies, and has no applicability where, as here, the injured party brings an action on her own behalf against the tortfeasor. *Cf. Marquez v. Prudential Property & Casualty Co.,*Colo., 620 P.2d 29 (1980).

Section 10 — 4-713(1), C.R.S.1973 (1979 Cum.Supp.) provides that an injured party is precluded from recovering damages from a tortfeasor which are recoverable as direct benefits under § 10-4-706, C.R.S.1973 (1979 Cum.Supp.). Therefore, the trial court did not err in setting off the P.I.P. payments received by plaintiff against the damages awarded to her by the jury. Section 10-4-713(1), C.R.S.1973 (1979 Cum.Supp.); *Pino v. Martinez,*40 Colo.App. 333, 574 P.2d 518 (1978). However, the recoverable P.I.P. benefits are to be deducted from the total amount of damages attributable to defendant’s negligence *before*the court reduces the judgment by the percentage of comparative negligence attributable to plaintiff. Colo.J.I. 11:21 (2d ed. 1980) (1981 Supp.); *see*§§ 10-4-713(1) and 10-4-706, C.R.S. 1973 (1979 Cum.Supp.).

The trial court therefore erred in reducing the judgment to $7,500 prior to setting off the P.I.P. payments received by plaintiff.

We have examined plaintiff’s remaining contentions of error and find them to be without merit.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court to enter judgment for plaintiff in the amount of $148.24.

VAN CISE and KELLY, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8021]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL01-10-000, et al.]


Puget Sound Energy, Inc., v. All Jurisdictional Sellers of Energy 
and/or Capacity at Wholesale Into Electric Energy and/or Capacity, 
Markets in the Pacific Northwest, Including Parties to the Western 
Systems Power Pool Agreement; Notice of Designation of Certain 
Commission Personnel as Non-Decisional

    Commission staff member Aaron Siskind, of the Office of Energy 
Market Regulation, was previously assigned to settlement and litigation 
proceedings in the above-referenced dockets when he worked for the 
Office of Administrative Litigation.
    As non-decisional staff, Mr. Siskind will not participate in an 
advisory capacity in the Commission's review of any future filings in 
the above-referenced dockets, including offers of settlement or 
settlement agreements.
    Mr. Siskind will not be assigned as advisory staff to review and 
process subsequent filings that are made in the above-referenced 
dockets, including any offer of settlement or settlement agreement. 
Non-decisional staff and advisory staff are prohibited from subsequent 
communications with one another concerning matters in the above-
referenced dockets.

    Dated: March 28, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8021 Filed 4-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
FalconTarget, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

FalconTarget, Inc.

Date: April 23, 2009

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan

Serge Atlan

Chairman

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly Report of West Coast Car Company
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Daniel Drummond, Chief Executive Officer of the small business issuer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the small
business issuer.



/s/ Daniel Drummond
-----------------------
Daniel Drummond
Chief Executive Officer

OCT 11, 2006
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

APPROPRIATIONS FOR 2019 

HEARINGS

BEFORE A 

SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE 

COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS 

SECOND SESSION 

SUBCOMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY 

JOHN R. CARTER, Texas, Chairman

JOHN ABNEY CULBERSON, Texas 

CHARLES J. FLEISCHMANN, Tennessee 

ANDY HARRIS, Maryland 

STEVEN M. PALAZZO, Mississippi 

DAN NEWHOUSE, Washington 

SCOTT TAYLOR, Virginia 

LUCILLE ROYBAL-ALLARD, California 

HENRY CUELLAR, Texas 

DAVID E. PRICE, North Carolina 

C. A. DUTCH RUPPERSBERGER, Maryland 

NOTE: Under committee rules, Mr. Frelinghuysen, as chairman of the full committee, and Mrs. Lowey, as 

ranking minority member of the full committee, are authorized to sit as members of all subcommittees. 

DONNA SHAHBAZ, KRIS MALLARD, LAURA CYLKE,

CHRISTOPHER ROMIG, and DAVE ROTH

Subcommitte Staff 

PART 2A 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

Answers to Submitted Questions for the Record 

Page

Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border 

Protection .............................................................................. 1

Federal Emergency Management Agency ......................... 29

United States Coast Guard .................................................... 45

( 

Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations 

U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 

31–359 WASHINGTON : 2018 
RODNEY P. FRELINGHUYSEN, New Jersey, Chairman

HAROLD ROGERS, Kentucky 1

ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, Alabama 

KAY GRANGER, Texas 

MICHAEL K. SIMPSON, Idaho 

JOHN ABNEY CULBERSON, Texas 

JOHN R. CARTER, Texas 

KEN CALVERT, California 

TOM COLE, Oklahoma 

MARIO DIAZ-BALART, Florida 

CHARLES W. DENT, Pennsylvania 

TOM GRAVES, Georgia 

KEVIN YODER, Kansas 

STEVE WOMACK, Arkansas 

JEFF FORTENBERRY, Nebraska 

THOMAS J. ROONEY, Florida 

CHARLES J. FLEISCHMANN, Tennessee 

JAIME HERRERA BEUTLER, Washington 

DAVID P. JOYCE, Ohio 

DAVID G. VALADAO, California 

ANDY HARRIS, Maryland 

MARTHA ROBY, Alabama 

MARK E. AMODEI, Nevada 

CHRIS STEWART, Utah 

DAVID YOUNG, Iowa 

EVAN H. JENKINS, West Virginia 

STEVEN M. PALAZZO, Mississippi 

DAN NEWHOUSE, Washington 

JOHN R. MOOLENAAR, Michigan 

SCOTT TAYLOR, Virginia 

—————

1 Chairman Emeritus 

NITA M. LOWEY, New York 

MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio 

PETER J. VISCLOSKY, Indiana 

JOSE ́ E. SERRANO, New York 

ROSA L. DELAURO, Connecticut 

DAVID E. PRICE, North Carolina 

LUCILLE ROYBAL-ALLARD, California 

SANFORD D. BISHOP, JR., Georgia 

BARBARA LEE, California 

BETTY MCCOLLUM, Minnesota 

TIM RYAN, Ohio 

C. A. DUTCH RUPPERSBERGER, Maryland 

DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Florida 

HENRY CUELLAR, Texas 

CHELLIE PINGREE, Maine 

MIKE QUIGLEY, Illinois 

DEREK KILMER, Washington 

MATT CARTWRIGHT, Pennsylvania 

GRACE MENG, New York 

MARK POCAN, Wisconsin 

KATHERINE M. CLARK, Massachusetts 

PETE AGUILAR, California 

NANCY FOX, Clerk and Staff Director 

(II)
EXHIBIT 31

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeff Huitt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of INTREorg Systems, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant and I have:

    a)     designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure that
           material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,  including  its
           consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
           entities,  particularly  during the  period in which  this  quarterly
           report is being prepared;

    b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
           and  procedures  as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
           of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c)     presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
           the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
           the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

    a)     all  significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
           controls which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
           record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
           identified for the registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
           internal controls; and

    b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
           employees who have a  significant role in  the  registrant's internal
           controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report
whether or not there were significant  changes in internal  controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 19, 2008


By:      /s/ Jeff Huitt
         ----------------------------------
         Jeff Huitt
         Chief Financial Officer and Accounting Officer
**Exhibit      32.2**

**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|  | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,                and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of                Registrant. |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                    |                                                                       |                                      |
|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                               |                                                                  |                                 |
| Dated:                November 13, 2007 |                                                                       | /s/ Vincent                Colangelo |
|                                    | Vincent                  ColangeloChief                  Financial Officer |

----
Meeting Between EPA and Zeneca Regarding Petition to Remove 

Paraquat Dichloride from EPCRA 302 EHS List 

December 15,1999 

I. INTRODUCTION: Heather Winett, Sr. Environmental Counsel, Zeneca Ag Products 

A. Purpose of Meeting 

B. Background on Zeneca's Paraquat Products 

11. TECHNICAL PRESENTATION: Dr. Richard Reiss, Jellinek Schwartz & Connolly 

A.. Physical and Chemical Properties of Paraquat Dichloride 

B. Chronology and Basis of EHS Listing 

C. Determination of Threshold Planning Quantity (TPQ) 

111. LEGAL BASIS FOR REVERSING EPA DENIAL OF DELISTING PETITION: 

Peter Gray, Esq., McKenna & Cuneo 

IV. DISCUSSION: All 

A. Open Questions (see Attachment) 

B. Path Forward 
ATTACHMENT 

Meeting Between EPA and Zeneca Regarding Petition to Remove Paraquat Dichloride 

from EPCRA 8 302 EHS List 

December 15,1999 

OPEN OUESTIONS 

1. Did EPA assign a V factor of 1 (i.e., a complete release) for all solids in solution? 

2. Is so, what was the basis for this decision? 

3. Is there any docurnentation available explaining EPA's basis far establishing a V factor for 

solids in solution? 

4. In its guidance on setting TPQs, EPA stated that solids in solution behave like liquids. If this 

statement is correct, how did EPA address this behavior in assigning V factors for solids in 

solution? 

5. How did EPA address application of the volatilization criterion to organic salts 

(i.e., organic substances that dissociate in solution) like paraquat? 

6. EPA assigned a lower V factor for liquids that are Iess volatile. How did EPA assign a 

V factor for solids in solution with no measurable vapor pressure?
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

 Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF COTTON

FOR RELEASE AT 12:00 P.M. CT November 10, 2021

U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of cotton. The cotton bales were

sold on The SEAM dated November 9, 2021. 

Offer No. Catalog Location Pounds

Sold

Bales 

Sold

Price Sold 

(per Pound) CCC Revenue

TS1108567 AR, LA, MS, 

MO, & TN 10,838 22 $.2100 $2,275.98
P130864

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0864 Focus Ready Draft 9/26/2013

ENGINEER: Hall \ Dimling

PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

TLV/PEL:

none established for PMN.

Page 1P130864

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1A

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

None.

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0864

Page 3P130864

Page 4P130864

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0864

Page 5P130864

Page 6P130864

Page 7P130864

Page 8
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of INTREorg Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Darren Dunckel, President and CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Dated: September 25, 2014








By: /s/ Darren Dunckel


Darren Dunckel


President, Principal Executive Officer & CEO








This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
FalconTarget, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

FalconTarget, Inc.

Date: May 2-, 2009

By:   /s/   Thomas Kirchner

Thomas Kirchner

Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before GASTON, HOUTZ, and GERRITY Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Anthony T. STROMER, Jr. Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant No. 201800320 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Decided: 28 December 2020 Military Judge: John P. Norman Sentence adjudged 27 August 2018 by a special court-martial convenedat Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by convening authority: reduction to E-1, confinement for eight months, and a bad-conduct discharge. 1 For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander R. Andrew Austria, JAGC, USN

For Appellee: Major Clayton L. Wiggins, USMC

1 In accordance with a pretrial agreement, the convening authority suspended confinement in excess of 60 days and the bad-conduct discharge.United States v. Stromer , NMCCA No. 201800320 Opinion of the Court

2 _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________ PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
FalconTarget, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

FalconTarget, Inc.

Date: April 23, 2009

By:   /s/   Thomas Kirchner

Thomas Kirchner

Chief Executive Officer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2004094EN.01004301.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/43

---

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 21 January 2004

in Case T-252/03 R Fédération nationale de l'industrie et des commerces en gros des viandes (FNICGV) v Commission of the European Communities

(Interim proceedings - Competition - Payment of a fine - Bank guarantee - Admissibility - Urgency - None)

(2004/C 94/122)

Language of the case: French

In Case T-252/03 R: Fédération nationale de l'industrie et des commerces en gros des viandes (FNICGV), established in Paris (France), represented by P. Abegg, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg, supported by the French Republic (agents: G. de Bergues and F. Million), against Commission of the European Communities (agents: P. Oliver and F. Lelièvre) – application for suspension of operation of Commission Decision 2003/600/EC of 2 April 2003 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 of the EC Treaty (Case COMP/C.38.279/F3 — French beef) (OJ 2003 L 209, p. 12) inasmuch as it imposed on the applicant a fine of EUR 720 000 and required it to establish a bank guarantee as a condition of the non-enforcement of that fine — the President of the Court of First Instance, made an order on 21 January 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1) | The application for interim measures is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1)

The application for interim measures is dismissed;

| 2) | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2)

The costs are reserved.

---