This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains documents other than rules or

proposed rules that are applicable to the

public. Notices of hearings and investigations,

committee meetings, agency decisions and

rulings, delegations of authority, filing of

petitions and applications and agency

statements of organization and functions are

examples of documents appearing in this

section.

Notices Federal Register

21961 

Vol. 77, No. 71 

Thursday, April 12, 2012 

1See Uncovered Innerspring Units from the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and 

Preliminary Rescission, in Part, of the Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 76126 

(December 6, 2011) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

April 9, 2012. 

The Department of Agriculture has 

submitted the following information 

collection requirement(s) to OMB for 

review and clearance under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13. Comments 

regarding (a) whether the collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate 

of burden including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on those who are to respond, including 

through the use of appropriate 

automated, electronic, mechanical, or 

other technological collection 

techniques and other forms of 

information technology should be 

addressed to: Desk Officer for 

Agriculture, Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs, Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), 

Washington, DC, 

OIRA_Submission@OMB.EOP.GOV or 

fax (202) 395–5806 and to Departmental 

Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail 

Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250– 

7602. Comments regarding these 

information collections are best assured 

of having their full effect if received 

within 30 days of this notification. 

Copies of the submission(s) may be 

obtained by calling (202) 720–8681. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor a collection of information 

unless the collection of information 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number and the agency informs 

potential persons who are to respond to 

the collection of information that such 

persons are not required to respond to 

the collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. 

Forest Service 

Title: Understanding Value Trade-Offs 

Regarding Fire Hazard Reduction 

Programs in the Wildland-Urban 

Interface. 

OMB Control Number: 0596–0189. 

Summary of Collection: The Healthy 

Forests Restoration Act (Pub. L. 108– 

148), improves the ability of the 

Secretary of Agriculture and the 

Secretary of the Interior to plan and 

conduct hazardous fuels reduction 

projects on National Forest System and 

Bureau of Land Management Lands. The 

Forest Service, Bureau of Land 

Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 

National Park Service, Fish and Wildlife 

Service, and many State agencies with 

fire protection responsibilities have 

undertaken a very ambitious and 

expensive forest fuels reduction 

program. The Forest Service (FS) and 

university researchers will contact 

recipients of a phone/mail questionnaire 

to help forest and fire managers 

understand value trade-offs regarding 

fire hazard reduction programs in the 

wildland-urban interface. 

Need and Use of the Information: 

Through the questionnaire, researchers 

will evaluate the responses of California 

and Colorado residents to different 

scenarios related to fire hazard 

reduction programs, how residents 

think the programs presented to them 

are effective, and calculate how much 

residents would be willing to pay to 

implement the alternatives. The 

collected information will help 

researchers provide better information 

to natural resources, forest, and fire 

managers when they are contemplating 

the kind and type of fire hazard 

reduction programs to implement to 

achieve forest land management 

planning objectives. Without the 

information the agencies with fire 

protection responsibilities will lack the 

capability to evaluate the general 

public’s understanding of proposed 

fuels reduction projects and programs or 

their willingness to pay for 

implementing such programs. 

Description of Respondents: 

Individuals or households. 

Number of Respondents: 1,000. 

Frequency of Responses: Reporting: 

Other (One time only). 

Total Burden Hours: 584. 

Charlene Parker, 

Departmental Information Collection 

Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2012–8814 Filed 4–11–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–11–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–928] 

Uncovered Innerspring Units From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results and Final Rescission, in Part, 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On December 6, 2011, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published in the 

Federal Register the Preliminary Results 

of the second administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on 

uncovered innersprings units 

(‘‘innersprings’’) from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 We gave 

interested parties an opportunity to 

comment on the Preliminary Results. 

None were received. As such, these final 

results do not differ from the 

Preliminary Results. We find that Reztec 

Industries Sdn Bhd (‘‘Reztec’’) did not 

sell subject merchandise during the 

period of review (‘‘POR’’), February 1, 

2010, through January 31, 2011 and, 

thus we are rescinding the 

administrative review, in part, with 

respect to Reztec. We additionally find 

that Goodnite Sdn Bhd (‘‘Goodnite’’) 

failed to cooperate to the best of its 

ability when it did not respond to the 

Department’s original questionnaire 

and, therefore, we have assigned 

Goodnite’s a rate based on total adverse 

facts available (‘‘AFA’’). The final 

dumping margin for this administrative 

review is listed in the ‘‘Final Results of 

Review’’ section below. 

DATES: Effective April 12, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Pulongbarit, AD/CVD Operations, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES