alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered April 5, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 19

- 00868

- CR

JUAN GABRIEL SOSA , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F

- 1612055

- L

O RDER

Appellant ’ s motion s for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing and

a motion for en banc reconsideration are GRANTED and appellant ’ s dead line for

filing a motion f or re hearing and a motion for reconsideration en banc is exte nded

t o May 6, 2021.

/ s/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE
FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is made andentered into as of August 6, 1998 by and between MedPartners, Inc











 



AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT






 



THIS AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is made and entered into effective April 14, 2003, by and between Caremark Rx, Inc., a Delaware Corporation ("Employer") and Howard McLure, a resident of Mountain Brook, Alabama ("Officer"). 







WHEREAS, Employer and Officer entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement ("Agreement") on December 3, 2001; and 







WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement to reflect a change in Officer's incentive compensation.







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement and this Amendment, the parties agree as follows: 
 















1.Amendment of Section 3 (2).Subsection (2) of Section 3 shall be amended as indicated by the bolded lettering below:



During the Term, Officer shall be eligible to receive from Employer incentive compensation in an amount equal to One Hundred (100%) percent of Base Salary (pro-rated for any partial calendar year during the Term), less state and federal tax and other legally required and Officer-authorized withholdings. The incentive compensation contemplated by this Section 3(2) shall be payable to Officer solely at the discretion of the Chief Executive Officer of Employer based upon Officer's performance.  The incentive compensation that Officer shall be eligible to earn under this Section 3(2) shall be subject to review and adjustment from time-to-time consistent with past practice.



















2.No Other Amendment. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement shall not be modified or amended and shall remain in full force and effect. 







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment and it is effective as of the date set forth above.







Caremark Rx, Inc.







 



     /s/ E. Mac Crawford



E. Mac Crawford



Chairman/Chief Executive Officer







      /s/ Howard McLure



Howard McLure
NO. 07-02-0511-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL E

	FEBRUARY 5, 2004

	______________________________

	DULCES NOMBRES BALDERRAMA AKA

	DULCES N. BALDERRAMA, APPELLANT

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 121ST DISTRICT COURT OF TERRY COUNTY;

	NO. 4844; HON. KELLY G. MOORE, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ., and BOYD, S.J.1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Presenting one issue which, he posits, requires reversal, appellant Dulces Nombres Balderrama challenges his conviction of felony grade driving while intoxicated.  Appellant pled guilty to the offense, but requested the jury to assess his punishment.  After hearing evidence, the jury assessed his punishment at eight years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Department of Criminal Justice.  In his sole issue, appellant contends the trial court erred in ruling that a defense witness could not testify that he (appellant) had been sentenced to four years penal confinement because of a revocation of probation in Andrews County heretofore granted him.  Disagreeing that reversal is required, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

	In relevant part, the record shows the following colloquy that took place in the absence of the jury:

	The Court:  Okay.   I have Shawn Bockleman . . . who’s going to be the Defense’s next witness.  And Mr. Bockleman, I just want you to know that since -- it’s my understanding on representation from Mr. Martinez that Mr. Balderrama’s probation in Andrews County was revoked by order of the judge and that he’s sentenced to serve four years in prison, but that has been appealed and that Mr. Balderrama is out on bond on that matter.  Under the law and for the purposes of this case then it’s just as if there had been no revokation [sic].  And so I’ve ruled in this case that the fact that a revokation [sic] order has been entered by the judge or that he’s been sentenced to any penitentiary time would not be mentioned since it’s on appeal.  Okay?

	The Witness:  Okay

	The Court:  I think that should cover the circumstances. 

	The record does not show any objection to the ruling of the court.

	Rule 33.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure specifically requires that to preserve a complaint for appellate review, the complaining party must make a “timely request, objection, or motion” with sufficient specificity to make the trial court aware of the complaint.  See also Purtell v. State, 761 S.W.2d 360, 365-66 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1059, 109 S.Ct. 1972, 104 L.Ed.2d 441 (1989); Zillender v. State, 557 S.W.2d 515, 517 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977).

	Because of the lack of a trial objection, there is nothing preserved for appellate review.  Accordingly, appellant’s issue does not present reversible error, and it is overruled.  The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

							John T. Boyd

							Senior Justice

Do not publish.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sealy Mattress Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 29, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David J. McIlquham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James B. Hirshorn, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



July 13,
2005

| |  |  | /s/DAVID J. MCILQUHAM                                                   
| |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  | David J. McIlquham
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
| |  |  | /s/JAMES B. HIRSHORN                                                    
| |  |  | James B. Hirshorn
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer) 

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31.1








RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) CERTIFICATION (SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)











I, Andrew J. McMonigle, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2022-2 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.








Date: May 26, 2023








/s/ Andrew J. McMonigle


Name: Andrew J. McMonigle


Title: Vice President and Treasurer


(Senior officer in charge of securitization)


Company: CarMax Auto Funding LLC


as Depositor on behalf of CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2022-2
OMB No. 0581-0178

(Exp. 3/31/2024) Destroy previous editions.

SOUTH TEXAS ONION COMMITTEE

901 Business Park Drive, Suite 500, Mission, TX 78572

Phone: (956) 584-9331 Fax: (956) 581-3912

20___ / 20____ ONION ACREAGE REGISTRATION

NAME & TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PERSON TO CONTACT AT YOUR FIRM: __________________________________________________________________________

HANDLER NAME: __________________________________________________________________

GROWER MAILING ADDRESS FIELD LOCATION AND BLK NUMBER ACRES 

RED

ACRES 

WHITE

ACRES 

YELLOW

DATE 

PLANTED

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control 

number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0581-0178. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 5 minutes per response, 

including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.

In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions 

participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, 

disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity 

conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.

Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible 

Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made 

available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at 

http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy 

of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights 1400 

Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Kenneth Townsend, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of McNab Creek Gold Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of McNab Creek Gold Corp. for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of McNab Creek Gold Corp.









Dated February 28, 2006

/s/Kenneth Townsend

Kenneth Townsend,

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit      32.1**

**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|  | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,                and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of                Registrant. |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                July 15, 2008 | /s/                Howard Katz               |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                                |  Chief                Executive Officer |

----
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 0562 Directorate ID : 2012 - SW - 038 - AD Helicopter Model: Enstrom Helicopter Corporation Model F - 28C, F - 28C - 2, F - 28F, 280C, 280F, 280FX, TH - 28, 480, and 480B Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 207 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : These actions in this AD are intended to prevent failure of the cyclic trim system and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 327 for Models 48 0, 480B, and TH - 28 $383 for Models 280C, 280F, 280FX, F - 28C, F 28C - 2, and F - 28F Labor per Helicopter ( 8 x $ 8 5 /work-hour for the modification) $ 680 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 1,007 for Models 480, 480B, and TH -28 $1,063 for Models 280 C, 280F, 280FX, F -28C, F 28C - 2, and F - 28F Total US Fleet Cost $ Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain B elow No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) 

### Project Engineer : Gregory J. Michalik
Exhibit32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of theQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September30,  2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the ‘‘Report’’) by MDwerks Inc. (the‘‘Registrant’’), I, Vincent Colangelo,Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certifythat:

|  |          |                                                                                                                                 |
|--|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 1.  | The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended, and |

|  |          |                                                                                                                                                   |
|--|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 2.  | The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial conditions and results of operations ofRegistrant. |

|  | /s/ VincentColangelo             |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated: November14, 2006

----
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 68 (Monday, April 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8475]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7842]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Edouard Vuillard: A Painter and His Muses, 1890-
1940''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Edouard Vuillard: A Painter and His Muses, 
1890-1940,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
The Jewish Museum, New York, New York from on or about May 4, 2012, 
until on or about September 23, 2012, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

     Dated: April 3, 2012.
 J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-8475 Filed 4-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Exhibit 35.1





Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.








This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 13, 2022 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-2 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.  I further certify as follows:





1. I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023, and its performance under the Agreement.





2. To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.








AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.





By:/s/ Connie CoffeyDated:March 4, 2024Connie CoffeyExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Kearny  Financial  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September  30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
John N. Hopkins,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



Date:  November 14, 2005
                                           /s/ John N. Hopkins
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John N. Hopkins
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Kearny  Financial  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September  30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Albert E. Gossweiler,  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



Date:  November 14, 2005
                               /s/ Albert E. Gossweiler
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Albert E. Gossweiler
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer