alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.1


SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


13
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Lifesciences Opportunities Incorporated
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Roland Perry, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 13 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      October 4, 2007




/s/
                Roland PerryRoland
                PerryChief
                Executive Officer and Principal Financial
                Officer
# FILED
May 23, 1997 Cecil W. Crowson Ap pellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEN NESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT NASHVILLE

CONNIE A. WILLIAMS, ) (Now Mo ntgo mery) ) ) Respondent/Count er-Petitioner/ ) Appellant, ) ) Appeal No. ) 01-A-01-9610- CV-00468 VS. ) ) Putnam Circuit ) No. NJ-3698 MICHAEL C. WILLIAMS, ) ) Petitioner/C ounter-Responden t/ ) Appellee. )

OPINION DISSENTING IN PART A ND CONCURRING IN THE RESULT
I respectfully

dissent from the maj ority’s conc lusion that a substanti al change of circumstances has not occurred since th e lower court’s prior custody order. Perhaps I am being overly technical, be cause the majori ty does q ualify its conclusion byadding, “sufficien tly compell ing to warrant chang ing custody .” I agree that the evidence preponderates against the trial judge’s finding that the best interests of the children would be s erved by placing t hem in the father’s primary c ustody, but I belie ve the parents’ new

relationshi ps, and the impact they have on the children is a sufficient change to wa rrant a fresh l ook by the court. Especi ally in this case, w here the children themselves have putout such contradictory signals about the changes in the ir lives. I would reverse the custody award based solely on the preponderance of the evidence.

_________________________________ BEN H. CAN TRELL, JUDGE
# C_2004094EN.01006701.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/67

---

Removal from the register of Case T-300/99 (1)

1

(2004/C 94/168)

(Language of the Case: Dutch)

(Language of the Case: Dutch)

By order of 22 January 2004 the President of the Second Chamber (Extended Composition) of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case T-300/99: Firma Reuvekamp V.O.F. v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 63 of 04.03.2000.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 72 (Friday, April 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 22348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8941]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Connected Media Experience, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 16, 2012, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Connected Media Experience, Inc. 
(``CMX'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Xertive, Tel Aviv, ISRAEL, has withdrawn as a party to 
this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and CMX intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On March 12, 2010, CMX filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 
16, 2010 (75 FR 20003).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on December 21, 
2011. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on January 11, 2012 (77 FR 1727).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-8941 Filed 4-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 31.1

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, Paul Fong, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Furio Resources Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date: October 8, 2004



/s/ Paul Fong

Name: Paul Fong

Title: President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Director
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 28, 2009 

l0420 

Order 

 

April 28, 2009 

137715 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137715 

 COA: 276591 

Wayne CC: 06-011565-01 

ROD HOLMES, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 14, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of INTREorg  Systems,  Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period  ended  September  30,  2008,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Jeff Huitt,  Chief
Financial Officer and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 19, 2008



By:      /s/ Jeff Huitt
         ----------------------------------
         Jeff Huitt
         Chief Financial Officer, Accounting Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 4, 2017

No. 04-17-00484-CV

BUCKSTOP ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC,

Appellant

v.

Cristino CASTANEDA Individually and dba Thermo Cooling Insulation,

Appellees

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Real County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-3309-DC

Honorable Spencer W. Brown, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The appellant’s motion for extension of time to file reply brief is hereby GRANTED. 

Time is extended to December 11, 2017.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of December, 2017.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Leslie A.Blodgett, Chief Executive Officer of Bare Escentuals, Inc. certify that:

1.     Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bare Escentuals, Inc.;

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

(a)   Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 14, 2007 | By:    | /s/ LESLIE A. BLODGETT               |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                    |   | Leslie A. Blodgett                   |
|                    |   | Chief Executive Officer and Director |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 125 (Thursday, June 28, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 38556-38557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2012-15070]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

22 CFR Parts 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, and 
130

[Public Notice [7927]]

Export Control Reform Transition Plan

Correction

    In proposed rule document 2012-15070 appearing on pages 37346-37349 
in the issue of Thursday, June 21, 2012 make the following correction:
    On page 37346, in the third column, in the document's heading, the 
CFR parts affected should read ``22 CFR Parts

[[Page 38557]]

120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, and 130''.

[FR Doc. C1-2012-15070 Filed 6-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Lee SHAW, a/k/a Larry Singleton, a/k/a Larry Westwood, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 79CA0398.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III.

July 31, 1980.

*186J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Hennessey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Mary J. Mullarkey, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Kathleen M. Bowers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

J. Gregory Walta, Colorado State Public Defender, Thomas M. Van Cleave, III, Deputy State Public Defender, Denver, for defendant-appellant.

KELLY, Judge.

Larry Shaw challenges his conviction of second degree burglary, conspiracy to commit second degree burglary, and criminal impersonation. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

Shaw challenges the admission of evidence seized from his person in the course of his arrest. However, by failing to move to suppress the evidence on the ground that the arrest was illegal, Shaw waived his objection to its admission. *Salazar v. People,*153 Colo. 93, 384 P.2d 725 (1963). He also argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for continuance. However, we conclude that Shaw failed to make a sufficient offer of proof to require one. *See People v. Martinez,*190 Colo. 507, 549 P.2d 758 (1976).

Finally, Shaw argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a guilty verdict of criminal impersonation. We agree.

The charge of criminal impersonation was based on Shaw’s statement to the arresting officer that his name was Larry Westwood. Section 18-5-113(1), C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8) provides:

> “A person commits criminal impersonation if he knowingly assumes a false or fictitious identity or capacity, and in such identity or capacity he:

> 

> (e) Does [an] act with intent to unlawfully gain a benefit for himself or another or to injure or defraud another.”

The record shows that the prosecution failed to present evidence to the jury that the use of the name would result in a benefit to Shaw. *See People v. Jones,*84 Misc.2d 737, 376 N.Y.S.2d 885 (1975); *see also People v. Powell,*59 App.Div.2d 950, 399 N.Y.S.2d 477 (1977).

Shaw’s conviction of criminal impersonation is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for the entry of an order dismissing that charge with prejudice. The convictions of conspiracy to commit second degree burglary and second degree burglary are affirmed.

RULAND and BERMAN, JJ., concur.
# C_2004094EN.01003609.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/36

---

Removal from the register of Case C-271/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 94/105)

By order of 4 February 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case C-271/03: Ireland v Commission of the European.

---

(1)  OJ C 200 of 23.08.2003.

1

---
1400 Independence Avenue, SW.

Room 3932-S

Washington, D.C. 20250-0201

June 26, 2012

AMENDMENT NO. 1

COMMODITY SPECFICATIONS

BULK PRODUCTS FOR FURTHER PROCESSING JUNE 2012

The purpose of this amendment is to add the prospect variety to the potatoes for processing 

specification.

1. Section II.B. Potatoes for Processing, Item 5, is revised to read:

5. Varieties – Shepody, Ranger, Umatilla, Alturas, Russett Burbank and Prospect. Varieties 

cannot be mixed.

2. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 59

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the

prevention of shaken baby syndrome.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 59

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas more than 1,000,000 children were abused or neglected in the United States during the most recent year

for which Government data is available regarding child

abuse and neglect;

Whereas more than 3 children die from abuse or neglect each

day in the United States;
2

•HCON 59 EH

Whereas, in 1998, 37.9 percent of all fatalities of children

under the age of 1 were caused by child abuse or neglect,

and 77.5 percent of all fatalities of children under the

age of 5 were caused by child abuse or neglect;

Whereas head trauma, including the trauma known as shaken baby syndrome, is the leading cause of death of

abused children;

Whereas shaken baby syndrome is the loss of vision, brain

damage, paralysis, seizures, or death that is caused by

severely or violently shaking a baby;

Whereas an estimated 3,000 babies, usually younger than 1

year of age, are diagnosed with shaken baby syndrome

every year, with thousands more misdiagnosed or undetected;

Whereas shaken baby syndrome often results in permanent,

irreparable brain damage or death;

Whereas the medical costs associated with caring for a baby

suffering from shaken baby syndrome often exceed

$1,000,000 in the first few years of the life of the baby;

Whereas the most effective method for ending the occurrence

of shaken baby syndrome is to prevent the abuse which

causes it;

Whereas educational and prevention programs regarding

shaken baby syndrome may prevent enormous medical

costs and unquantifiable grief at minimal cost;

Whereas programs to prevent shaken baby syndrome have

been shown to raise awareness and provide critically important information about shaken baby syndrome to parents, caregivers, day care workers, child protection employees, law enforcement personnel, health care professionals, and legal representatives;
3

•HCON 59 EH

Whereas programs and techniques to prevent child abuse and

shaken baby syndrome are supported by the Shaken

Baby Alliance, Children’s Defense Fund, National Children’s Alliance, American Humane Association, Prevent

Child Abuse America, National Exchange Club Foundation, Child Welfare League of America, National Association of Children’s Hospitals and Related Institutions,

Center for Child Protection and Family Support, Inc.,

American Academy of Pediatrics, and American Medical

Association; and

Whereas increased awareness of shaken baby syndrome and

of the techniques to prevent it would help end the abuse

that causes shaken baby syndrome: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress—

3 (1) strongly supports efforts to protect children

4 from abuse and neglect; and

5 (2) encourages the people of the United States

6 to educate themselves regarding shaken baby syn7 drome and the techniques to prevent it.

Passed the House of Representatives April 3, 2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                       CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Ted Kozub,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of Quantum
Energy inc. (the "Company"),  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:

(i)   the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
      ended May 31,  2006  (the  "Quarterly  Report")  fully  complies  with the
      requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and

(ii)  the information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company.




By:
           /s/ Ted Kozub
           -------------------------------------------
Name:      Ted Kozub
Title:     Chief Executive Officer and
           Chief Financial Officer
Date:      July 19 , 2005




This  written  statement  is being  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB.  A
signed  original of this  statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.


This certification  accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall  not,  except to the
extent  required  by such Act, be deemed  filed by the  Company for  purposes of
Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as amended (the  "Exchange
Act").  Such  certification  will not be deemed to be  incorporated by reference
into any filing under the  Securities  Act of 1933, as amended,  or the Exchange
Act,  except to the extent  that the  Company  specifically  incorporates  it by
reference.