22340 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 72 / Friday, April 13, 2012 / Notices 

maintain disk and backup files of IMS/ 

PIC data. 

RETRIEVABILITY: 

Tenant records may be retrieved by 

computer search of indices by the Head 

of Household’s or household member’s 

name, date of birth, and/or SSN of an 

existing or form HUD program 

participant. PHA records may be 

retrieved by PHA Code, User ID, and/or 

IMS/PIC user’s last name. Note: A user’s 

search capability is limited to only those 

program participants within the user’s 

jurisdiction and assigned to his or her 

User ID. 

SAFEGUARDS: 

Records are maintained at the U.S. 

Department of Housing and Urban 

Development in Washington, DC with 

limited access to those persons whose 

official duties require the use of such 

records. Computer files and printed 

listings are maintained in locked 

cabinets. Background screening, limited 

authorization and access with access 

limited to authorize personnel and 

authorize users. User’s access, updates 

access, read-only access, and approval 

access based on the user’s role and 

security access level. 

RETENTION AND DISPOSAL: 

Electronic records are maintained and 

destroyed in accordance with 

requirements of the HUD Records 

Disposition Schedule, 2225–6. In 

accordance with 24 CFR 908.101 and 

HUD record retention requirements at 

24 CFR 85.42, PHAs are required to 

retain at least three years’ worth of IMS/ 

PIC data either electronically or in paper 

form. 

SYSTEM MANAGERS AND ADDRESSES: 

Office of Public and Indian Housing 

(PIH), Real Estate Assessment Center 

(REAC) Nicole Faison, IMS/PIC System 

Business Owner. Department of Housing 

and Urban Development, 451 Seventh 

Street SW., Room PCFL1, Washington, 

DC 20410; Eugene Chen, PIC/IMS 

System Project Manager, Department of 

Housing and Urban Development, 451 

Seventh Street SW., Room PCFL2, 

Washington, DC 20410. 

NOTIFICATION AND RECORD ACCESS

PROCEDURES: 

Individuals seeking to determine 

whether this system of records contains 

information about them, or those 

seeking access to such records, should 

address inquiries to Harold Williams, 

Acting Chief Privacy Officer, 

Department of Housing and Urban 

Development, 451 Seventh Street SW., 

Room 4156, Washington, DC 20410. 

Provide verification of your identity by 

providing two proofs of identification. 

Your verification of identity must 

include your original signature and 

must be notarized. 

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: 

Since tenant information reported in 

IMS/PIC is submitted to HUD by PHAs 

based on information collected directly 

from the individual, tenants must 

contact the PHA to request correction of 

any tenant-supplied information 

reported incorrectly by the PHA. HUD 

does not have the ability to modify 

PHA-reported data within IMS/PIC. 

With respect to any HUD determination 

based on IMS/PIC data, the procedures 

for appealing HUD’s initial 

determination records are outlined in 24 

CFR part 16. If additional information is 

needed, contact: 

(i) Contesting content of records: The 

Acting Chief Privacy Officer, 

Department of Housing and Urban 

Development, 451 Seventh Street SW., 

Room 4156, Washington, DC 20410, if 

contesting the content of records; or 

(ii) Appeals of initial HUD 

determinations: The Departmental 

Privacy Appeals Office, Office of 

General Counsel, Department of 

Housing and Urban Development, 451 

Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 

20410 for appeals of initial denials. 

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: 

IMS/PIC receives data from HUD staff, 

HUD contractors, PHAs, PHA-hired 

management agents, the Social Security 

Administration, the Department of 

Veteran Affairs, the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, other federal, state 

and local agencies. The IMS/PIC data 

reported by PHAs and PHA-hired 

management agents is electronically 

transmitted to IMS/PIC using PHAowned software or via HUD’s Family 

Reporting Software (FRS). 

EXEMPTIONS FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE

ACT: 

None. 

[FR Doc. 2012–8968 Filed 4–12–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–67–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

[Docket No. FR–5620–N–01] 

Section 8 Housing Assistance 

Payments Program-Annual Adjustment 

Factors, Fiscal Year 2012 

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HUD. 

ACTION: Notice of Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 

Annual Adjustment Factors (AAFs). 

SUMMARY: The United States Housing 

Act of 1937 requires that assistance 

contracts signed by owners participating 

in the Department’s Section 8 housing 

assistance payment programs provide 

annual adjustments to monthly rentals 

for units covered by the contracts. This 

notice announces FY 2012 AAFs for 

adjustment of contract rents on 

assistance contract anniversaries. The 

factors are based on a formula using 

residential rent and utility cost changes 

from the most recent annual Bureau of 

Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index 

(CPI) survey. These factors are applied 

at Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) 

contract anniversaries for those calendar 

months commencing after the effective 

date of this notice. For FY 2011 and FY 

2010, these AAFs were designated as 

‘‘Contract Rent’’ AAFs, to differentiate 

them from ‘‘Renewal Funding’’ AAFs 

that were used exclusively for renewal 

funding of tenant-based rental 

assistance. Renewal Funding AAFs are 

being replaced by an inflation factor 

established by the Secretary, so there is 

no need to differentiate the AAF by use. 

A separate Federal Register Notice will 

be published that will identify the 

inflation factors that will be used to 

adjust tenant-based rental assistance 

funding for FY 2012. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 13, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael S. Dennis, Director, Housing 

Voucher Programs, Office of Public 

Housing and Voucher Programs, Office 

of Public and Indian Housing, 202–708– 

1380, for questions relating to the 

Project-Based Certificate and Moderate 

Rehabilitation programs (non Single 

Room Occupancy); Ann Oliva, Director, 

Office of Special Needs Assistance 

Programs, Office of Community 

Planning and Development, 202–708– 

4300, for questions regarding the Single 

Room Occupancy (SRO) Moderate 

Rehabilitation program; Catherine 

Brennan, Acting Director, Office of 

Housing Assistance and Grant 

Administration, Office of Housing, 202– 

708–3000, for questions relating to all 

other Section 8 programs; and Geoffrey 

Newton, Economist, Economic and 

Market Analysis Division, Office of 

Policy Development and Research, 202– 

402–6058, for technical information 

regarding the development of the 

schedules for specific areas or the 

methods used for calculating the AAFs. 

The mailing address for these 

individuals is: Department of Housing 

and Urban Development, 451 7th Street 

SW., Washington, DC 20410. Hearing- or 

speech-impaired persons may contact 

the Federal Information Relay Service at 

800–877–8339 (TTY). (Other than the 

‘‘800’’ TTY number, the above-listed 

telephone numbers are not toll free.) 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 72 / Friday, April 13, 2012 / Notices 22341 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The tables 

showing AAFs are available 

electronically from the HUD data 

information page at http://www.

huduser.org/portal/datasets/aaf/

FY2012_tables.pdf. 

I. Applying AAFs to Various Section 8 

Programs 

AAFs established by this Notice are 

used to adjust contract rents for units 

assisted in certain Section 8 housing 

assistance payment programs during the 

initial (i.e., pre-renewal) term of the 

HAP contract and for all units in the 

Project-Based Certificate program. There 

are three categories of Section 8 

programs that use the AAFs: 

Category 1—The Section 8 New 

Construction, Substantial 

Rehabilitation, and Moderate 

Rehabilitation programs. 

Category 2—The Section 8 Loan 

Management (LM) and Property 

Disposition (PD) programs. 

Category 3—The Section 8 ProjectBased Certificate (PBC) program. 

Each Section 8 program category uses 

the AAFs differently. The specific 

application of the AAFs is determined 

by the law, the HAP contract, and 

appropriate program regulations or 

requirements. 

AAFs are not used in the following 

cases: 

Renewal Rents. With the exception of 

the Project-Based Certificate program, 

AAFs are not used to determine renewal 

rents after expiration of the original 

Section 8 HAP contract (either for 

projects where the Section 8 HAP 

contract is renewed under a 

restructuring plan adopted under 24 

CFR part 401; or renewed without 

restructuring under 24 CFR part 402). In 

general, renewal rents are based on the 

applicable state-by-state operating cost 

adjustment factor (OCAF) published by 

HUD; the OCAF is applied to the 

previous year’s contract rent minus debt 

service. 

Budget-based Rents. AAFs are not 

used for budget-based rent adjustments. 

For projects receiving Section 8 

subsidies under the LM program (24 

CFR part 886, subpart A) and for 

projects receiving Section 8 subsidies 

under the PD program (24 CFR part 886, 

subpart C), contract rents are adjusted, 

at HUD’s option, either by applying the 

AAFs or by budget-based adjustments in 

accordance with 24 CFR 886.112(b) and 

24 CFR 886.312(b). Budget-based 

adjustments are used for most Section 8/ 

202 projects. 

Tenant-based Certificate Program. In 

the past, AAFs were used to adjust the 

contract rent (including manufactured 

home space rentals) in both the tenantbased and project-based certificate 

programs. The tenant-based certificate 

program has been terminated and all 

tenancies in the tenant-based certificate 

program have been converted to the 

Housing Choice Voucher Program, 

which does not use AAFs to adjust 

rents. All tenancies remaining in the 

project-based certificate program 

continue to use AAFs to adjust contract 

rent for outstanding HAP contracts. 

Voucher Program. AAFs are not used 

to adjust rents in the Tenant-Based or 

the Project-Based Voucher programs. 

II. Adjustment Procedures 

This section of the notice provides a 

broad description of procedures for 

adjusting the contract rent. Technical 

details and requirements are described 

in HUD notices H 2002–10 (Section 8 

New Construction and Substantial 

Rehabilitation, Loan Management, and 

Property Disposition) and PIH 97–57 

(Moderate Rehabilitation and ProjectBased Certificates). 

Because of statutory and structural 

distinctions among the various Section 

8 programs, there are separate rent 

adjustment procedures for the three 

program categories: 

Category 1: Section 8 New Construction, 

Substantial Rehabilitation, and 

Moderate Rehabilitation Programs 

In the Section 8 New Construction 

and Substantial Rehabilitation 

programs, the published AAF is applied 

to the pre-adjustment contract rent (the 

contract rent in effect prior to the 

application of the AAF). In the Section 

8 Moderate Rehabilitation program 

(both the regular program and the single 

room occupancy program) the published 

AAF is applied to the pre-adjustment 

base rent (the base rent in effect prior to 

the application of the AAF). 

For Category 1 programs, the Table 1 

AAF is applied before determining 

comparability (for purposes of 

determining rent reasonableness). 

Comparability applies if the preadjustment gross rent (pre-adjustment 

contract rent plus any allowance for 

tenant-paid utilities) is above the 

published Fair Market Rent (FMR). 

If the comparable rent level (plus any 

initial difference) is lower than the 

contract rent as adjusted by application 

of the Table 1 AAF, the comparable rent 

level (plus any initial difference) will be 

the new contract rent. However, the preadjustment contract rent will not be 

decreased by application of 

comparability. 

In all other cases (i.e., unless the 

contract rent is reduced by 

comparability): 

• The Table 1 AAF is used for a unit 

occupied by a new family since the last 

annual contract anniversary. 

• The Table 2 AAF is used for a unit 

occupied by the same family as at the 

time of the last annual contract 

anniversary. 

Category 2: Section 8 Loan Management 

Program (24 CFR Part 886, Subpart A) 

and Property Disposition Program (24 

CFR Part 886, Subpart C) 

At this time Category 2 programs are 

not subject to comparability. 

(Comparability will again apply if HUD 

establishes regulations for conducting 

comparability studies under 42 U.S.C. 

1437f(c)(2)(C).) 

The applicable AAF is determined as 

follows: 

• The Table 1 AAF is used for a unit 

occupied by a new family since the last 

annual contract anniversary. 

• The Table 2 AAF is used for a unit 

occupied by the same family as at the 

time of the last annual contract 

anniversary. 

Category 3: Section 8 Project-Based 

Certificate Program 

The following procedures are used to 

adjust contract rent for outstanding HAP 

contracts in the Section 8 PBC program: 

• The Table 2 AAF is always used. 

The Table 1 AAF is not used. 

• The Table 2 AAF is always applied 

before determining comparability (rent 

reasonableness). 

• Comparability always applies. If the 

comparable rent level is lower than the 

rent to owner (contract rent) as adjusted 

by application of the Table 2 AAF, the 

comparable rent level will be the new 

rent to owner. 

• The new rent to owner will not be 

reduced below the contract rent on the 

effective date of the HAP contract. 

III. When To Use Reduced AAFs (From 

AAF Table 2) 

In accordance with Section 8(c)(2)(A) 

of the United States Housing Act of 

1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(c)(2)(A)), the AAF 

is reduced by 0.01: 

• For all tenancies assisted in the 

Section 8 Project-Based Certificate 

program. 

• In other Section 8 programs, for a 

unit occupied by the same family at the 

time of the last annual rent adjustment 

(and where the rent is not reduced by 

application of comparability (rent 

reasonableness)). 

The law provides that: 

Except for assistance under the certificate 

program, for any unit occupied by the same 

family at the time of the last annual rental 

adjustment, where the assistance contract 

provides for the adjustment of the maximum 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
22342 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 72 / Friday, April 13, 2012 / Notices 

1CPI indexes CUUSA103SEHA and 

CUSR0000SAH2 respectively. 

2The formulas used to produce these factors can 

be found in the Annual Adjustment Factors 

overview and in the FMR documentation at 

www.HUDUSER.org. 

3There are four non-metropolitan counties that 

continue to use CPI city updates: Ashtabula County, 

OH, Henderson County, TX, Island County, WA, 

and Lenawee County, MI. BLS has not updated the 

geography underlying its survey for new OMB 

metropolitan area definitions and these counties, 

are no longer in metropolitan areas, but they are 

included as parts of CPI surveys because they meet 

the 75 percent standard HUD imposes on survey 

coverage. These four counties are treated the same 

as metropolitan areas using CPI city data. 

monthly rent by applying an annual 

adjustment factor and where the rent for a 

unit is otherwise eligible for an adjustment 

based on the full amount of the factor, 0.01 

shall be subtracted from the amount of the 

factor, except that the factor shall not be 

reduced to less than 1.0. In the case of 

assistance under the certificate program, 0.01 

shall be subtracted from the amount of the 

annual adjustment factor (except that the 

factor shall not be reduced to less than 1.0), 

and the adjusted rent shall not exceed the 

rent for a comparable unassisted unit of 

similar quality, type and age in the market 

area. 42 U.S.C. 1437f(c)(2)(A). 

Legislative history for this statutory 

provision states that ‘‘the rationale [for 

lower AAFs for non-turnover units is] 

that operating costs are less if tenant 

turnover is less * * *’’ (see Department 

of Veteran Affairs and Housing and 

Urban Development, and Independent 

Agencies Appropriations for 1995, 

Hearings Before a Subcommittee of the 

Committee on Appropriations 103d 

Cong., 2d Sess. 591 (1994)). The 

Congressional Record also states the 

following: 

Because the cost to owners of turnoverrelated vacancies, maintenance, and 

marketing are lower for long-term stable 

tenants, these tenants are typically charged 

less than recent movers in the unassisted 

market. Since HUD pays the full amount of 

any rent increases for assisted tenants in 

section 8 projects and under the Certificate 

program, HUD should expect to benefit from 

this ‘tenure discount.’ Turnover is lower in 

assisted properties than in the unassisted 

market, so the effect of the current 

inconsistency with market-based rent 

increases is exacerbated. (140 Cong. Rec. 

8659, 8693 (1994)). 

To implement the law, HUD 

publishes two separate AAF Tables, 

Tables 1 and 2. The difference between 

Table 1 and Table 2 is that each AAF 

in Table 2 is 0.01 less than the 

corresponding AAF in Table 1. Where 

an AAF in Table 1 would otherwise be 

less than 1.0, it is set at 1.0, as required 

by statute; the corresponding AAF in 

Table 2 will also be set at 1.0, as 

required by statute. 

IV. How To Find the AAF 

AAF Tables 1 and 2 are posted on the 

HUD User Web site at http:// 

www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/aaf/ 

FY2012_tables.pdf. There are two 

columns in each AAF table. The first 

column is used to adjust contract rent 

for rental units where the highest cost 

utility is included in the contract rent, 

i.e., where the owner pays for the 

highest cost utility. The second column 

is used where the highest cost utility is 

not included in the contract rent, i.e., 

where the tenant pays for the highest 

cost utility. 

The applicable AAF is selected as 

follows: 

• Determine whether Table 1 or Table 

2 is applicable. In Table 1 or Table 2, 

locate the AAF for the geographic area 

where the contract unit is located. 

• Determine whether the highest cost 

utility is or is not included in contract 

rent for the contract unit. 

• If highest cost utility is included, 

select the AAF from the column for 

‘‘Highest Cost Utility Included.’’ If 

highest cost utility is not included, 

select the AAF from the column for 

‘‘Highest Cost Utility Excluded.’’ 

V. Methodology 

AAFs are rent inflation factors. Two 

types of rent inflation factors are 

calculated for AAFs: gross rent factors 

and shelter rent factors. The gross rent 

factor accounts for inflation in the cost 

of both the rent of the residence and the 

utilities used by the unit; the shelter 

rent factor accounts for the inflation in 

the rent of the residence, but does not 

reflect any change in the cost of utilities. 

The gross rent inflation factor is 

designated as ‘‘Highest Cost Utility 

Included’’ and the shelter rent inflation 

factor is designated as ‘‘Highest Cost 

Utility Excluded.’’ 

AAFs are calculated using CPI data on 

‘‘rent of primary residence’’ and ‘‘fuels 

and utilities.’’ 1 The CPI inflation index 

for rent of primary residence measures 

the inflation of all surveyed units 

regardless of whether utilities are 

included in the rent of the unit or not. 

In other words, it measures the inflation 

of the ‘‘contract rent’’ which includes 

units with all utilities included in the 

rent, units with some utilities included 

in the rent, and units with no utilities 

included in the rent. In producing a 

gross rent inflation factor and a shelter 

rent inflation factor, HUD decomposes 

the contract rent CPI inflation factor into 

parts to represent the gross rent change 

and the shelter rent change. This is done 

by applying data from the Consumer 

Expenditure Survey (CEX) on the 

percentage of renters who pay for heat 

(a proxy for the percentage of renters 

who pay shelter rent) and also American 

Community Survey (ACS) data on the 

ratio of utilities to rents.2

Survey Data Used To Produce AAFs 

The rent and fuel and utilities 

inflation factors for large metropolitan 

areas and Census regions are based on 

changes in the rent of primary residence 

and fuels and utilities CPI indices from 

2009 to 2010. The CEX data used to 

decompose the contract rent inflation 

factor into gross rent and shelter rent 

inflation factors come from a special 

tabulation of 2009 CEX survey data 

produced for HUD for the purpose of 

computing AAFs. The utility-to-rent 

ratio used to produce AAFs comes from 

2009 ACS median rent and utility costs. 

Geographic Areas 

AAFs are produced for all Class A CPI 

cities (CPI cities with a population of 

1.5 million or more) and for the four 

Census Regions. They are applied to 

core-based statistical areas (CBSAs), as 

defined by the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB), according to how 

much of the CBSA is covered by the CPI 

city-survey. If more than 75 percent of 

the CBSA is covered by the CPI citysurvey, the AAF that is based on that 

CPI survey is applied to the whole 

CBSA and to any HUD-defined 

metropolitan area, called the ‘‘HUD 

Metro FMR Area’’ (HMFA), within that 

CBSA. If the CBSA is not covered by a 

CPI city-survey, the CBSA uses the 

relevant regional CPI factor. Almost all 

non-metropolitan counties use regional 

CPI factors.3 For areas assigned the 

Census Region CPI factor, both 

metropolitan and non-metropolitan 

areas receive the same factor. 

Each metropolitan area that uses a 

local CPI update factor is listed 

alphabetically in the tables and each 

HMFA is listed alphabetically within its 

respective CBSA. Each AAF applies to 

a specific geographic area and to units 

of all bedroom sizes. AAFs are 

provided: 

• For separate metropolitan areas, 

including HMFAs and counties that are 

currently designated as nonmetropolitan, but are part of the 

metropolitan area defined in the local 

CPI survey. 

• For the four Census Regions (to be 

used for those metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas that are not covered 

by a CPI city-survey). 

AAFs use the same OMB metropolitan 

area definitions, as revised by HUD, that 

are used for the FY 2012 FMRs. 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 72 / Friday, April 13, 2012 / Notices 22343 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

Area Definitions 

To make certain that they are using 

the correct AAFs, users should refer to 

the Area Definitions Table section at 

http://www.huduser.org/portal/ 

datasets/aaf/FY2012_AreaDef.pdf. The 

Area Definitions Table lists CPI areas in 

alphabetical order by state, and the 

associated Census region is shown next 

to each state name. Areas whose AAFs 

are determined by local CPI surveys are 

listed first. All metropolitan areas with 

local CPI surveys have separate AAF 

schedules and are shown with their 

corresponding county definitions or as 

metropolitan counties. In the six New 

England states, the listings are for 

counties or parts of counties as defined 

by towns or cities. The remaining 

counties use the CPI for the Census 

Region and are not specifically listed in 

the Area Definitions Table at http:// 

www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/aaf/ 

FY2012_AreaDef.pdf. 

Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands use 

the South Region AAFs. All areas in 

Hawaii use the AAFs listed next to 

‘‘Hawaii’’ in the Tables which are based 

on the CPI survey for the Honolulu 

metropolitan area. The Pacific Islands 

use the West Region AAFs. 

Dated: April 3, 2012. 

Raphael W. Bostic, 

Assistant Secretary for Policy Development 

and Research. 

[FR Doc. 2012–8971 Filed 4–12–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–67–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

[NPS–WASO–NRNHL–0412–9961; 2200– 

3200–665] 

National Register of Historic Places; 

Notification of Pending Nominations 

and Related Actions 

Nominations for the following 

properties being considered for listing 

or related actions in the National 

Register were received by the National 

Park Service before March 24, 2012. 

Pursuant to section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 

60, written comments are being 

accepted concerning the significance of 

the nominated properties under the 

National Register criteria for evaluation. 

Comments may be forwarded by United 

States Postal Service, to the National 

Register of Historic Places, National 

Park Service, 1849 C St. NW., MS 2280, 

Washington, DC 20240; by all other 

carriers, National Register of Historic 

Places, National Park Service, 1201 Eye 

St. NW., 8th floor, Washington DC 

20005; or by fax, 202–371–6447. Written 

or faxed comments should be submitted 

by April 30, 2012. Before including your 

address, phone number, email address, 

or other personal identifying 

information in your comment, you 

should be aware that your entire 

comment—including your personal 

identifying information—may be made 

publicly available at any time. While 

you can ask us in your comment to 

withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

J. Paul Loether, 

Chief, National Register of Historic Places/ 

National Historic Landmarks Program. 

MICHIGAN 

Alger County 

Grand Marais Harbor of Refuge Inner and 

Outer Lights, (Light Stations of the United 

States MPS) W. pier at entry to Grand 

Marais Harbor of Refuge (Burt Township), 

Grand Marais, 12000254. 

MISSOURI 

St. Louis Independent City 

Yeatman Square Historic District, Parts of 

Glasgow, Leffingwell, Madison, Magazine, 

& N. Market Sts., St. Louis (Independent 

City), 12000255. 

NEW YORK 

Oneida County 

Wright Settlement Cemetery, Cemetery Rd., 

Wright Settlement, 12000256. 

Orange County 

Denniston—Steidle House, 575 Jackson Ave., 

New Windsor, 12000257. 

Orleans County 

Clarendon General Store, 16301 E. Lee Rd., 

Clarendon, 12000258. 

Payjack Chevrolet Building, 320 N. Main St., 

Medina, 12000259. 

Saratoga County 

Smith’s Grain and Feed Store, 857 Main St., 

Elnora, 12000260. 

Schoharie County 

Stewart House and Howard—Stewart Family 

Cemetery, 583 NY 10, South Jefferson, 

12000261. 

Westchester County 

St. George’s Church, 1715 E. Main St., 

Mohegan Lake, 12000262. 

NORTH CAROLINA 

Forsyth County 

Pepper Building, 100–106 W. 4th St., 

Winston-Salem, 12000263. 

[FR Doc. 2012–8867 Filed 4–12–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–51–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–1089 (Review)] 

Certain Orange Juice From Brazil 

Determination 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year review, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (Commission) determines, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

order on certain orange juice from Brazil 

would not be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. 

Background 

The Commission instituted this 

review on February 1, 2011 (76 FR 5822, 

February 2, 2011) and determined on 

May 9, 2011 that it would conduct a full 

review (76 FR 30197, May 24, 2011). 

Notice of the scheduling of the 

Commission’s review and of a public 

hearing to be held in connection 

therewith was given by posting copies 

of the notice in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, Washington, DC, and by 

publishing the notice in the Federal 

Register on July 14, 2011 (76 FR 43344, 

July 20, 2012). The hearing was held in 

Washington, DC, on January 24, 2012, 

and all persons who requested the 

opportunity were permitted to appear in 

person or by counsel. 

The Commission transmitted its 

determination in this review to the 

Secretary of Commerce on April 9, 2012. 

The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 4311 

(April 2012), entitled Certain Orange 

Juice from Brazil: Investigation No. 731– 

TA–1089 (Review). 

Issued: April 10, 2012. 

By order of the Commission. 

James R. Holbein, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2012–8898 Filed 4–12–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES