alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Action brought on 2 February 2004 by Roderich Weißenfels against European Parliament

(Case T-33/04)

(2004/C 94/129)

Language of the case: German

An action against the European Parliament was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 2 February 2004 by Roderich Weißenfels, residing in Bereldingen (Luxembourg), represented by H. Arend, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

For some years, the applicant has received a double child allowance under Article 67(3) of the Staff Regulations. Since December 1998, the applicant's severely disabled son has been receiving monthly disability assistance payments from a Luxembourg fund. In 1999, the applicant notified these payments as a precaution. As a result, the amount of the payments from the fund, which regularly exceeded the double child allowance, was deducted from these family allowances, repayment was demanded of past sums paid since the award of the special assistance by the Luxembourg fund, and family allowances which would otherwise have been due thereafter were subsequently not paid.

The applicant claims that the conditions under which a deduction may be made under Article 67(2) of the Staff Regulations have not been met. According to the definition in Article 67(3), the double child allowance is to be paid in order to relieve the financial burden on an official who, because his child is severely handicapped, is involved in ‘heavy expenditure’. By contrast, the fund defines payments made by it as ‘special assistance for severely disabled persons’. They are separate payments, which are awarded to the handicapped child itself, rather than to the applicant, even though the money is paid to the child's legal representative because the person entitled to it is a minor. The payments are thus neither ‘allowances’, nor are they ‘of like nature’. Their deduction under Article 67(2) of the Staff Regulations is therefore unlawful. Furthermore, the deductions were, from the start, made contrary to the better legal view.

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

CHRISTIAN STAHL,

Appellant

v.

FORMER PRESIDENT JUDGE CHAD F. KENNEY (IN HIS OFFICIAL ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY); JUDGE WILLIAM C. MACKRIDES (IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY); JUDGE LINDA A. CARTISANO (IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY); JUDGE BARRY C. DOZOR (IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY);

CUSTODY CONCILIAT OR GREGORY J. HURCHALLA (INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY), AND CRAIG

BRANDEN HUFFMAN, ESQ.,

Appellees :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 28 MAP 2018

Appeal from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court at No. 385 MD 2017 dated May 2, 2018

O RDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: March 26, 2019

AND NOW, this 26 th day of March , 2019

, the order of the Commonwealth Court is

AFFIRMED

.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Premium Beef, LLC (the Company) onForm 10-Q for the period ended February 26, 2011 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott J. Miller,Chief Reporting and Compliance Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

     (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

     (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

|   |   |                                                                                     |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:    |   | /s/ Scott J. Miller                                                                      |
|   |   |                                                                                     |
|   |   | Scott J. Miller*Chief Financial Officer*

*(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

Date: April 8, 2011
​

**Exhibit 35.1**

​

**Servicer Compliance Statement of John Deere Capital Corporation**

​

I, Katrin Watkins, Assistant Secretary of John Deere Capital Corporation, state:

​

A review of John Deere Capital Corporation’s activities for the period from October 30, 2023 through October 27, 2024 (the “Reporting Period”) and of John Deere Capital Corporation’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 16, 2022 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables LLC and John Deere Owner Trust 2022 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, John Deere Capital Corporation has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

​

​

​

​

| ​                | ​                        | ​              |
|------------------------|--------------------------------|----------------------|
| Date: January 10, 2025 | John Deere Capital Corporation |
| ​                | ​                        | ​              |
| ​                | By:                            | */s/ Katrin Watkins* |
| ​                | ​                        | Katrin Watkins       |
| ​                | ​                        | Assistant Secretary  |
| ​                | ​                        | ​              |
| ​                | ​                        | ​              |
|                        | ​                        | ​              |

​

​

----
| (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of                  15 (d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                          |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: August                    22, 2005 |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |   |
|                                          | Jeffrey                      O. NyweideChief Financial Officer, Executive Vice                      President,Corporate Development and Secretary (Principal Financial Officer and Principal                      Accounting                      Officer) |

----
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Blackhawk Capital Group
      BDC, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Craig
      A.
      Zabala, as acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereto certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  May
      9,
      2007








/s/
      Craig
      A. Zabala





Craig
      A.
      Zabala


Acting
      Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Blackhawk Capital Group BDC Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SendTec, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Soltoff, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|/s/ Paul Soltoff                                                               
|Paul SoltoffChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)August 14, 2008
#### The OKLAHOMA PUBLISHING COMPANY, A corporation, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Floyd MARTIN, Judge of the District Court for the Seventh Judicial District, Canadian County, Oklahoma, Respondent.

No. 55191.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Oct. 14, 1980.

*945David Machanic and Michael Minnis, Pierson, Ball & Dowd, Oklahoma City, for petitioner.

Jan Eric Cartwright, Atty. Gen., Manville T. Buford, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner’s application to assume original jurisdiction GRANTED. The question of the right of the public or the media to attend a mental competency hearing or trial, conducted under the provision of Title 43A, Okla.Stat., wherein the alleged mentally incompetent is the subject of criminal proceedings, is rendered moot by the enactment of H.B. No. 1836, Thirty-Seventh Legislature, Second Regular Session.

Hereafter, all proceedings conducted pursuant to 22 O.S.Supp.1980, §§ 1175.1 to 1175.8 (H.B.1836), shall be publicly conducted to the same extent as criminal trials. For the impact of Federal Constitutional Law, See: *Richmond Newspapers v. Virginia,*- U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 2814, 65 L.Ed.2d 973 (1980). While 43A O.S.Supp. 1978, § 54.1, requires that civil mental health “records shall be open to public inspection only by order of the court to persons having a legitimate interest therein”, no such provision is found in 22 O.S.Supp. 1980, § 1175.1, et seq.

APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION/MANDAMUS DENIED.

All the Justices concur.
Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) Monthly Inventory Report

As of January 29, 2024

(Million Units Except as Noted)

CCC Commodity 

Unit of 

Measure

Outstanding Under 

Loan

CY 2022

Outstanding 

Under Loan

CY 2023

CCC-Owned 

Inventory

(Actual Units)

Butter Pounds - - -

Cheese Pounds - - -

Nonfat Dry Milk Pounds - - -

Barley Bushels 0.0 2.9 0.0 

Corn Bushels 0.6 388.2 0.0 

Oats Bushels 0.0 0.5 0.0 

Sorghum Cwt. 0.0 0.5 0.0 

Soybeans Bushels 0.2

 

59.0 0.0 

Wheat Bushels 0.3 18.5 0.0 

Rice Cwt. 0.2 28.9 0.0 

Refined Sugar Pounds 80.0 1,313.5 0.0 

 In-process Beet Pounds 0.0 865.0 0.0 

Raw Cane Sugar Pounds 0.0 1,035.2 0.0 

 In-process Cane Pounds - - -

Honey Pounds 0.0 7.0 0.0 

Peanuts 

Tons (not 

millions)

 

 2,000 

 

1,907,100 0.0 

Canola Seed* Cwt. 0.0 465.0 0.0 

Crambe* Cwt. - - -

Flaxseed* Cwt. 0.0 12.0 0.0 

Mustard Seed* Cwt. 1.0 9.0 0.0 

Rapeseed* Cwt. - - -

Safflower Seed* Cwt. 0.0 19.0 0.0 

Sesame Seed* Cwt. - - -

Sunflower Seed (Oil)* Cwt. 0.0 552.0 0.0 

Sunflower Seed (Other)* Cwt. 0.0 10.0 0.0 

Dry Peas* Cwt. 1.0 217.0 0.0 

Lentils* Cwt. 0.0 23.0 0.0 

Chickpeas* Cwt. 0.0 34.0 0.0 

Upland Cotton

1,000 

Running 

Bales 0.0 3,468.9 0.0

ELS Cotton

1,000 

Running 

Bales 1.1 165.0 0.0
Notes: 

• *Minor Oilseeds & Pulses are in thousand units.

• The table below illustrates the month Marketing Assistance Loans (MALs) were 

forfeited to CCC (Forfeitures Received), liquidation of CCC-owned inventory 

(Sales), and CCC-owned inventory as of the date this report was completed 

(CCC-owned Inventory).

Date Forfeitures Received Sales CCC-owned Inventory

Feb-23

Mar-23

Apr-23

May-23

Jun-23

Jul-23

Aug-23 4 bales Upland cotton 4 bales Upland cotton 0

Sep-23 12 bales Upland cotton 12 bales Upland cotton 0

Oct-23

146 bales Upland cotton, 

20.63 tons Runner 

peanuts

146 bales Upland cotton, 

20.63 tons Runner 

peanuts

0

Nov-23

35 bales Upland cotton, 

56.49 tons Runner & 

Spanish peanuts

35 bales Upland cotton, 

56.49 tons Runner & 

Spanish peanuts

0

Dec-23 4 bales Upland cotton 4 bales Upland cotton 0

Jan-24 0
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 97 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 97

Authorizing the printing of a collection of the rules of the committees 
                             of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 23, 2017

  Mr. Shelby (for himself and Ms. Klobuchar) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the printing of a collection of the rules of the committees 
                             of the Senate.

    Resolved, That a collection of the rules of the committees of the 
Senate, together with related materials, be printed as a Senate 
document, and that there be printed 250 additional copies of such 
document for the use of the Committee on Rules and Administration.
                                 <all>
```
III 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 487

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 15, 2002

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the printing as a House document of a volume 

consisting of the transcripts of the ceremonial meeting 

of the House of Representatives and Senate in New 

York City on September 6, 2002, and a collection of 

statements by Members of the House of Representatives 

and Senate from the Congressional Record on the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring),

2

HCON 487 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING PRINTING OF VOLUME OF TRAN2 SCRIPTS OF NEW YORK CITY MEETING AND 

3 STATEMENTS ON TERRORIST ATTACKS OF 

4 SEPTEMBER 11. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—A volume consisting of the tran6 scripts of the ceremonial meeting of the House of Rep7 resentatives and Senate in New York City on September 

8 6, 2002, and a collection of statements by Members of 

9 the House of Representatives and Senators on the ter10 rorist attacks of September 11, 2001, shall be printed as 

11 a House document under the direction of the Joint Com12 mittee on Printing, with suitable binding. 

13 (b) STATEMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN VOLUME.—

14 A statement by a Member of the House of Representatives 

15 or a Senator on the terrorist attacks of September 11, 

16 2001, shall be included in the volume printed under sub17 section (a) if the statement—

18 (1) was printed in the Congressional Record 

19 prior to the most recent date on which the House of 

20 Representatives adjourned prior to the date of the 

21 regularly scheduled general election in November 

22 2002; and 

23 (2) is approved for inclusion in the volume by 

24 the Committee on House Administration of the 

25 House of Representatives (in the case of a statement 

26 by a Member of the House) or the Committee on 

3

HCON 487 RDS 

1 Rules and Administration of the Senate (in the case 

2 of a statement by a Senator). 

3 SEC. 2. NUMBER OF COPIES. 

4 The number of copies of the document printed under 

5 section 1 shall be 15,000 casebound copies, of which—

6 (1) 15 shall be provided to each Member of the 

7 House of Representatives; 

8 (2) 25 shall be provided to each Senator; and 

9 (3) the balance shall be distributed by the Joint 

10 Committee on Printing to Members of the House of 

11 Representatives and Senators, based on requests 

12 submitted to the Joint Committee by Members and 

13 Senators. 

14 SEC. 3. MEMBER DEFINED. 

15 In this concurrent resolution, the term ‘‘Member of 

16 the House of Representatives’’ includes a Delegate or 

17 Resident Commissioner to the Congress.

Passed the House of Representatives October 10, 

2002. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 75 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 75

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3055, the Clerk of the House 
of Representatives shall make the following corrections:
            (1) Amend the long title so as to read: ``Making further 
        continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2020, and for other 
        purposes.''.
            (2) Redesignate the second subsection (a) of section 1703 
        as subsection (b).

            Passed the House of Representatives November 19, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 75

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

     Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a 
               correction in the enrollment of H.R. 3055.
```
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Second Amended
Quarterly Report of INverso Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter
ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Randall S. Goulding, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:      June
      30, 2009
              /s/
      Randall S. GouldingBy:  Randall
      S. GouldingIts:  Chief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
INverso Corp. and will be retained by INverso Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AAM-12-316-E April 24, 2012

Exemption No. 10514 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0401

Mr. Douglas M. Forest Manager International Helicopter Services, LLC 1940 Airport Road Great Falls, MT 59404

Dear Mr. Forest:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 11, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of International Helicopter Services, LLC (IHS) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow IHS to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to IHS.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two drug and alcohol testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant International Helicopter Services, LLC an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow IHS to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations

described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of IHS are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of the IHS part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure