alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 76 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 76

Expressing support for the designation of March 21, 2017, as ``National 
                        Rosie the Riveter Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 1, 2017

   Mr. Casey (for himself, Mr. Isakson, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Coons, Mrs. 
   Shaheen, Mrs. Feinstein, and Mr. Manchin) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                             March 15, 2017

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for the designation of March 21, 2017, as ``National 
                        Rosie the Riveter Day''.

Whereas National Rosie the Riveter Day is a collective national effort to raise 
        awareness of the 16,000,000 women who worked during World War II;
Whereas the people of the United States have chosen to honor women workers who 
        contributed from the home front during World War II;
Whereas those women left their homes to work or volunteer full-time in 
        factories, farms, shipyards, airplane factories, banks, and other 
        institutions in support of the Armed Forces overseas;
Whereas those women worked with the United Service Organizations and the 
        American Red Cross, drove trucks, riveted airplane parts, collected 
        critical materials, rolled bandages, and served on rationing boards;
Whereas it is fitting and proper to recognize and preserve the history and 
        legacy of working women, including volunteer women, during World War II 
        to promote cooperation and fellowship among those women and their 
        descendants;
Whereas those women and their descendants wish to further the advancement of 
        patriotic ideas, excellence in the workplace, and loyalty to the United 
        States; and
Whereas March 21, 2017, during Women's History Month, is an appropriate day to 
        designate as ``National Rosie the Riveter Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the designation of March 21, 2017, as 
        ``National Rosie the Riveter Day''; and
            (2) acknowledges the important role played by women during 
        World War II.
                                 <all>
```
To : " E ugene C hen" < C hen .E ugene @ epa m a il. epa . go v> , " Tho m a s Webb " <Webb

. Tho m a s @ epa m a il. epa . go v> , C c: B cc: S ub j e c t: F w: R e i d G a r

dne r Q ue s ti ons F r o m: C o ll een M

c K aughan /R 9

/USEPA/US - Wedne s da y 03/ 28 / 2012 12 : 40

PM Fo ll o w U p: N o rm a l Pri o rit y . Fo ll o w up on 03/

30 / 2012

.

Co ll een M

c K aughan

----- Ori g i na l Me ss age ----- From: Colleen McKaughan Sent: 03/14/2012 05:25 PM MST To: melges@ndep.nv.gov Cc: Amy Zimpfer Subject: Reid Gardner Questions H i , M i k e, A s we d i sc u ss ed th i s afte rnoon, he r e a r e the two que s t

i on s fo r wh i c h we need w

ri tten r e s pon s e s . I k now y ou went o v e r y ou r r

e s pon s e s on the phone, but i f y ou c ou l d p r o v i de them i n w

ri t i ng fo r ou r r e c o r d s , that wou l d be g r

eat. I w ill c a ll y ou tomo rr

ow r ega r d i ng the othe r

top i c that we d i sc u ss ed to p r o v i de ND EP w

i th mo r e i nfo rmat

i on. T han ks s o mu c h, Co ll een


### 1

. Wha t i s t he t echn i ca l , un it

- s pec ifi c exp l ana ti on f o r the d iff

e r ence i n the RO F A/R o t a mi x l e v e l o f pe rf o r m ance o f U n it3 i n r e l a ti on t o U n it s 1 and 2? 2

. A r e y ou a w ar e o f w h i ch coa l s ou r ce s N e v ada E ne r gy pu r cha s e s it s f ue l f o r R e i d G ar dne r fr o m?

Co ll een W . M

c K aughan A ss o c i ate D i r

e c to r, A i r D i v i s i on U SEPA , Reg i on 9 ( 520 ) 498

- 0118
III

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 279

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 20 (legislative day, DECEMBER 18), 2001

Received and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing and commending the excellent service of members of the Armed Forces who are prosecuting the war

to end terrorism and protecting the security of the Nation.

Whereas among the first military units to make this

transition to wartime operations was the USS Enterprise Battle Group, which, on September 11, 2001,

while en route back to the United States from a

scheduled peacetime deployment, was immediately redeployed to conduct operations against terrorists;
2

HCON 279 RFS

Whereas elements of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and

Marine Corps began deploying to the theater of war

to secure bases and support combat operations as

early as September 19, 2001; and

Whereas since then, not only have the special operations

and conventional forces of all the services performed

magnificently, but the members of the Armed Forces

have repeatedly demonstrated an extraordinary level

of commitment and professionalism: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress recognizes and commends

3 the excellent service of all in the Armed Forces who are

4 prosecuting the war to end terrorism and protecting the

5 security of the Nation.

Passed the House of Representatives December 20,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 43 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 43

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 22, 2001

   Received and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the printing of a revised and updated version of the House 
     document entitled ``Black Americans in Congress, 1870-1989''.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 

SECTION 1. PRINTING OF REVISED VERSION OF ``BLACK AMERICANS IN 
              CONGRESS, 1870-1989''.

    (a) In General.--An updated version of House Document 101-117, 
entitled ``Black Americans in Congress, 1870-1989'' (as revised by the 
Library of Congress), shall be printed as a House document by the 
Public Printer, with illustrations and suitable binding, under the 
direction of the Committee on House Administration of the House of 
Representatives.
    (b) Number of Copies.--In addition to the usual number, there shall 
be printed 30,700 copies of the document referred to in subsection (a), 
of which--
            (1) 25,000 shall be for the use of the Committee on House 
        Administration of the House of Representatives; and
            (2) 5,700 shall be for the use of the Committee on Rules 
        and Administration of the Senate.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 21, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Sl()-1()()3()4-()4 1



# ObFAIRPOR T ROGE R MILLIKE N FIEL D

I=ebruai 7 24 , 201 0 Th e Honorabl e Raymon d H . LaHoo d Secretar y U.S . Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w JerseyAve , S E Washington , D

C 2059 0 Docket DOT-OST-2010-003 4 Dea rMr . Secretary : Than k yo u fo rth e opportunit yt o expres s m ysuppor t fo rth e applicatio n fo rantitrus t Immunity an d propose d join t busines s agreemen t filed b yAmerica n Airline s an d Japa n Airlines . Th e propose d allianc e betwee n thes e tw o airline s I s vita l fo rth e oneworl d allianc e t o compet e effectivel ywit h th e Sta ran d SkyTea m alliances . Thi s Increase d allianc e competitio n wil l i n tur n enhance th e benefit s o f th e Department' s Ope n Skie s polic y- first b ysolidifyin g U.S . - Japa n Ope n Skies , the n b yservin g a s a foundatio n fo rfijrtiierliberalizatio n acros s Asia . Afte ra thoroug h review , I encourag e th e Departmen t o f Transportatio n t o approv e thi s applicatio n a

s i t woul d enabl e thes e oneworl d allianc e airline s t o wor k closel ytogethe rt o delive rhighl ycompetitiv e ai rtransportatio n services . Approva l fo rAA/JA L allianc e wil l have a positiv e Impac

t o n ai rtrave l b yofferin g customers more service , schedulin g an d pricin g option s an d wil l hel p t o ensure tha t customers continu e t o benefi t fro m th e competi'tio n afforde d b y thre e competitiv e ai ralliances . I urg e yo u t o quickl yapprov e thi s application . Sincerely , / Davi d N . Edwarels , Jr. , A.A.E . Executive Directo r

Greenville-Spartanbur g Airpor t Commissio n 200 0 GS P Driv e • Suit e 1 • Greer , Sout h Carolin a 2965 1 * Greenvill e 864-877-742 6 • Spartanbur g 864-439-447 6 • Fa x864-848-622 5 Roge rMilliken,Cha(mio n Leian d Burc h Valeri e J.S . Mille rHeni yA . Ramell a Mino rM.Sha w Wallac e Store yOovi d N . Edwards , Jr. , AAE. , Btecutrv e Oi'recfo r www.gspairport.co m
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

MICHAEL LLOYD WORRELL,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D23-165

LT Case No. 16-2012-CF-8774-AX

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Decision filed February 28, 2023

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Duval County,

Tatiana Salvador, Judge.

Michael L. Worrell, Graceville, pro 

se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

JAY, BOATWRIGHT and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
#### Bertha L. Hunter, as Administratrix, etc., Plaintiff, *v.*1001 Tenants Corporation et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

November 21, 1958.

*J oshua Sidney Shultz*for plaintiff.

*William J. Kenney*for Fred Christensen and another, defendants.

*Reilly <& Reilly*for 1001 Tenants Corporation and another, defendants.

John E. Cone, J.

Plaintiff moves to strike out paragraph “third” of defendant corporation’s answer and paragrap*h ‘*seventh ’ ’ of the answer of the individual defendants, under subdivision 6 of rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that the defenses set forth therein are insufficient in law.

The complaint alleges a cause of action for wrongful death of plaintiff’s intestate, a window cleaner, due to the negligence of the defendants in failing to comply and conform with the requirements of and in violating section 202 of the Labor Law of the State of New York. The numbered paragraphs set up the defense of contributory negligence. The defense of contributory negligence may not be asserted as a defense in an action predicated on a violation of section 202 of the Labor Law. *(Koenig*v. *Patrick Constr. Corp.,*298 N, Y. 313; *Pollard*v. *Trivia Bldg. Co.,*291 N. Y. 19; *Teller*v. *Prospect Heights Hosp.,*255 App. Div. 488, revd. on other grounds 280 N. Y. 456; *Stern*v. *Great Is. Corp.,*250 App. Div. 115.)

*Teller*v. *Prospect Heights Hosp. (280*N. Y. 456, *supra),*relied on by defendants, is readily distinguishable. There the court held that the complaint could not be so construed as to permit the cause of action to depend upon the statute alone since the allegation of violation of duty was exclusively limited to the failure of the defendant to provide anchors attached to the side frames of the windows of the building, etc., whereas the statute contained no such requirement. The requirement was contained in the rules of the Industrial Board, a violation of which merely constituted some evidence of defendant’s negligence, whereas *583negligence consisting of a violation of a statute might constitute negligence as a matter of law. In *Koenig*v. *Patrick Constr. Corp. (supra)*it was pointed out that where the statute is designed to protect a definite class of persons from a hazard, which they themselves are incapable of avoiding, it is deemed to create a statutory cause of action and to impose a liability unrelated to questions of negligence.

The motions to strike the defenses are granted. Settle orders on notice.
EX-4.1





 Exhibit 4.1 

ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF IDEX BIOMETRICS ASA 

Corp. ID no. NO 976 846 923 VAT 

(last amended on 23 May 2022) 
  

	§1	 The name of the company is IDEX Biometrics ASA and it is a public limited company. 



 

	§2	 The objective of the Company is to deliver identification systems and other activities related to this.



  

	§3	 The business offices are in the Oslo municipality, Norway. 



 

	§4	 The company’s shares shall be registered in the Norwegian Registry of Securities. 



 

	§5	 The share capital is NOK 151,891,358.10 divided into 1,012,609,054 shares each with a nominal value of NOK 0.15
per share and issued in name. 


  

	§6	 The board of the Company consists of from three to seven members in accordance with the annual general
meeting’s instruction. 


  

	§7	 The annual general meeting shall convene in or near Oslo at the board’s decision, and shall consider:



  

	 	•	 	 Determination of the annual financial statements 



 

	 	•	 	 Appropriation of (net) profit or covering of losses 



 

	 	•	 	 Election of chair of the board and board members 



 

	 	•	 	 Election of chair and members of the nomination committee 



 

	 	•	 	 Election of auditor 


  

	 	•	 	 Determination of remuneration to the board of directors, members of the nomination committee and the auditor



  

	 	•	 	 Other matters which are governed by law 



 

	 	•	 	 Other matters which are mentioned in the notice of the annual general meeting. 



 

	§8	 a. The company shall have a nomination committee. The nomination committee shall have three members, including
a chairman. Members of the nomination committee shall be elected by the annual general meeting for a term of two years. 



b. The nomination committee shall: 
  

	 	•	 	 Propose candidates for election to the board of directors 



 

	 	•	 	 Propose the remuneration to be paid to the board members 



 

	 	•	 	 Propose candidates for election to the nomination committee 



 

	 	•	 	 Propose the remuneration to be paid to the nomination committee members 



c. The guidelines for the nomination committee shall be resolved by the annual general meeting. 

 

	§9	 Documents which timely have been made available on the Internet site of the company and which deal with matters
that are to be considered at the general meeting need not be sent to the company’s shareholders. 


  

	§10	 As a general rule, the company’s general meetings shall be conducted in Norwegian. The general meeting may
however resolve by a simple majority vote that English shall be used. Shareholders may present their points of view in the Norwegian or English language. 


  

	§11	 A shareholder who wishes to attend the general meeting, in person or by proxy, shall notify his/her attendance
to the company no later than 2 days prior to the general meeting. If the shareholder does not notify the company of his/her attendance in a timely manner, the company may deny him/her access to the general meeting.
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
FalconTarget, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the
fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

FalconTarget, Inc.

Date: February 14, 2007

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan

Serge Atlan

Chairman

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

REBECCA L. JOHNSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 83 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

REBECCA L. JOHNSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 84 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

REBECCA L. JOHNSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 85 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM
[83 MAL 2022, 84 MAL 2022 and 85 MAL 2022] - 2

AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John F. LeFABRE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 80CA1207.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

Feb. 13, 1981.

STERNBERG, Judge.

This is a non-adversary review of sentence proceeding taken pursuant to C.A.R. 4(d)(3) and (4) pursuant to § 18-1 — 409.5, C.R.S.1973 (1979 Cum.Supp.). Upon his plea of guilty to criminal attempt to commit escape, a class 4 felony, defendant was sentenced to a term of one and one-third years, plus one year of parole, to be served concurrently with a sentence defendant was presently serving. The presumptive sentence for a class 4 felony is two to four years incarceration, plus one year of parole.

The record reveals that, in imposing its sentence, the court followed the recommendations of defendant’s attorney and of the district attorney and that it considered the pre-sentence investigation report, the nature of the crime, and the background of the defendant. Nothing in the record indicates any impropriety in the proceedings in the trial court, or in the court’s judgment and sentence.

We note, however, that there is an apparent failure to follow the requirements of the statute as interpreted by this court in *People v. Abila,*Colo.App., 606 P.2d 81 (1980). There we held that a separate written order was needed which detailed the extraordinary circumstances leading the court not to sentence within the presumptive range. We also held that a reporter’s *933transcript of the court’s findings does not suffice. As in *Ahila,*the court’s findings appear in the transcript; however, here they are separately denominated and signed. The objective of *Abila*and the statute is to require that there be a separate written order, which is part of the trial court’s file, and thus readily available for inspection. Here, since the transcript of the order is separately denominated and signed, this objective can be met by copying the transcription of this order, and placing it in the file.

Consequently, the trial court is directed to have the transcription of its sentencing order copied and placed in its file, and thereupon the sentence in this case shall be deemed approved.

COYTE and BERMAN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
      32




**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Lincoln Park Bancorp, (the “Company”) on
        Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission (the “Report”), David G. Baker, President and Chief
        Executive Officer of the Company, and Nandini S. Mallya, Chief Financial
        Officer
        of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection
        with this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB, that he/she has reviewed the Form
        10-QSB and that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 (2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                David G. Baker
              David
                G. Baker
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer
              (Chief
                Executive Officer)
              
              
              /s/
                Nandini S. Mallya
              Nandini
                S. Mallya
              Vice
                President and Treasurer
              (Chief
                Financial Officer)







August
      14, 2007
UNITED STATES COURT O F APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

January 20 , 2015

No. 14

- 1168

ROSEANN MARIE ZIRNSAK,

Ap pellant

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY

(W .D. Pa. No. 2

- 13

- cv

- 00303 )

Present: VANASKIE, COWE N and VAN ANTWERPEN

, Circuit Judges

1. Motion filed by Appellee Commissioner Social Security to publish opinion

dated 12/09/2014

2. Response filed by Appellant Roseann Zirnsak in Opposition to Appellee’s

Motion to Publish Opinion.

Respe ctfully,

Clerk/JK

____________________

__ ___________ORDER________________________________

The foregoing motion by Appellee Commissioner Social Security to publish opinion

dated 12/09/2014 is granted.

By the Court,

s/ Frank lin S. Van Antwerpen

Circuit Judge

Dated: February 12, 2015

JK/cc: Sarah H. Bohr, Esq.

Beverly H. Zuckerman, Esq.