# UTAH STATE BULLETIN

OFFICIALNOTICES OF UTAH STATE GOVERNMENT Filed September 01, 2012, 12:00 a.m. through September 14, 2012, 11:59 p.m.

Number 2012-19 October0I,2012

Nancy 

### L. Lancaster, Editor Kenneth A. Hansen, Director Kimberly K. Hood, Executive Director

The 

## Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin) is an official noticing publication ofthe executive branch of Utah State Government. The Department ofAdministrative Services, Division ofAdministrative Rules produces the

## Bulletin under authority ofSection 63G-3-402. Inquiries concerning the substance or applicability ofan administrative rule that appears in the 

## Bulletin should be addressed to the contact person for the rule. Questions about the 

## Bulletin or the rulemaking process may be addressed to: Division ofAdministrative Rules, POBox 141007, SaltLake City, Utah 84114-1007, telephone 801-538-3764, FAX 801-537-9240. Additional rulemaking information, and electronic versions of all administrative rule publications are available at: http://www.rules.utah.gov/

The information in this 

## Bulletin is summarized in the 

## Utah State Digest (Digest). The

## Digest is available by E-mail or over the Internet. Visit http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/digest.htm for additional information.Division ofAdministrative Rules, Salt Lake City 84114

Unless otherwise noted, all infom1ation presented in this publication is in the public domain and may be reproduced, reprinted, and redistributed as desired. Materials incorporated by reference retain the copyright asserted by theirrespective authors. Citation to the source is requested.

Utah state bulletin. Semimonthly. I. Delegated legislation--Utah--Periodicals. 2. Administrative procedure-Utah-Periodicals. I. Utah. Office ofAdministrative Rules.

KFU440.A73S7 348.792'025-DDC 85-643197

## TABLE OF CONTENTS

SPECIAL NOTICES

.........................................................................................................................................................................1 Environmental Quality Air Quality Notice of Public Comment Period forthe Fireworks Exceptional Events

...................................................................1
EXECUTIVE DOCUMENTS

.............................................................................................................................................................3 Governor Administration Governor's Executive Order E0/09/2012: Wildland Fire Management..

...................................................................3 Governor's Proclamation 2012/07/E: Calling the Fifty-Ninth Legislature Into

the Seventh Extraordinary Session

..........................................................................................................................4 Governor's Executive Order E0/10/2012: Declaring a State of Emergency Due

to a Breached Dam and Flooding in Washington County

........................................................................................5
NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

.................................................................................................................................................7 Commerce Occupational and Professional Licensing No. 36759 (Amendment): R156-24b Physical Therapy PracticeAct Rule

.................................................................8 No. 36757 (Amendment): R156-60 Mental Health Professional PracticeAct Rule

................................................:.11 No. 36758 (Amendment): R156-60c Professional Counselor LicensingAct Rule

...................................................13 Education Administration No. 36769 (Amendment): R277-112 Prohibiting Discrimination in the Public Schools

............................................18 No. 36770 (Amendment): R277-420-1 Definitions

...................................................................................................20 No. 36771 (Amendment): R277-423 Delivery of FlowThrough Money

...................................................................21 No. 36772 (Amendment): R277-424-1 Definitions

...................................................................................................22 No. 36773 (Amendment): R277-454-1 Definitions

...................................................................................................23 No. 36774 (Amendment): R277-531 Public Educator Evaluation Requirements (PEER)

.......................................24 Environmental Quality Administration No. 36775 (New Rule): R305-8 Board MemberAttendance Requirements

.............................................................27 No. 36776 (New Rule): R305-9 Recusal of a Board Memberfor Conflict of lnterest..

.............................................28 Air Quality No. 36723 (Amendment): R307-101-2 Definitions

...................................................................................................29 No. 36742 (Amendment): R307-110 General Requirements: State Implementation

Plan

........................................................................................................................................................................36 No. 36721 (Amendment): R307-110-10 Section IX, Control Measures forArea and

Point Sources, PartA, Fine Particulate Matter

.......................................................................................................40 No. 36722 (Amendment): R307-110-17 Section IX, Control Measures forArea and

Point Sources, Part H, Emissions Limits

................................................................................................................41 No. 36741 (Amendment): R307-307 Davis, Salt Lake, and Utah Counties: Road

Salting and Sanding

...............................................................................................................................................42 No. 36724 (New Rule): R307-311 Emission Standards for PM2.5 NonattainmentAreas

........................................44 No. 36740 (New Rule): R307-312 Aggregate Processing Operations for PM2.5

NonattainmentAreas

..............................................................................................................................................45 No. 36739 (New Rule): R307-334 Emissions Standards: Industrial Baking Ovens

................................................47 No. 36725 (Repeal): R307-340 Ozone Nonattainment and MaintenanceAreas: Surface

Coating Processes

.................................................................................................................................................49 No. 36738 (Amendment): R307-343 Ozone Nonattainment and MaintenanceAreas:

Emissions Standards for Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations

....................................................................56 No. 36726 (New Rule): R307-344 Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings

...........................................................................65 No. 36727 (New Rule): R307-345 Fabric and Vinyl Coatings

..................................................................................67 No. 36728 (New Rule): R307-346 Metal Furniture Surface Coatings

......................................................................69 No. 36729 (New Rule): R307-347 LargeAppliance Surface Coatings

....................................................................71 No. 36730 (New Rule): R307-348 MagnetWire Coatings

.......................................................................................73 No. 36731 (New Rule): R307-349 Flat Wood Panel Coatings

.................................................................................74



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, OctoberOI,2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19TABLE OF CONTENTS

No. 36732 (New Rule): R307-350 Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products

Coatings

.................................................................................................................................................................76 No. 36733 (New Rule): R307-351 GraphicArts

.......................................................................................................80 No. 36734 (New Rule): R307-352 Metal Container, Closure, and Coil Coatings

.....................................................84 No. 36735 (New Rule): R307-353 Plastic Part Coatings

.........................................................................................86 No. 36736 (New Rule): R307-354Automotive Refinishing Coatings

.......................................................................88 No. 36737 (New Rule): R307-355 Control of Emissions from Aerospace Manufacture

and Rework Facilities

............................................................................................................................................91 Governor Economic Development No. 36749 (Amendment): R357-6 Technology and Life Science Economic Development

and Related Tax Credits

.........................................................................................................................................94 Health Family Health and Preparedness, Child Care Licensing No. 36715 (Amendment): R430-6 Background Screening

.......................................................................................95 No. 36716 (Amendment): R430-50 Residential Certificate Child Care

....................................................................98 No. 36717 (Amendment): R430-60 Hourly Child Care Centers

.............................................................................100 No. 36718 (Amendment): R430-70 Out ofSchool Time Child Care Programs

...................................................... 103 No. 36719 (Amendment): R430-90 Licensed Family Child Care

...........................................................................107 No. 36720 (Amendment): R430-100 Child Care Centers

.......................................................................................110 Heritage and Arts History No. 36762 (Amendment): R455-4Ancient Human Remains

.................................................................................. 112 Insurance Administration No. 36745 (New Rule): R590-265 Hazardous Financial Condition Rule

................................................................113 Workforce Services Employment Development No. 36761 (Amendment): R986-200-247 Utah Back to Work Pilot Program (BWP)

..............................................116 Unemployment Insurance No. 36760 (Amendment): R994-406-302 Repayment and Collection of Fault

Overpayments

......................................................................................................................................................118

FIVE-YEAR NOTICES OF REVIEWAND STATEMENTS OF CONTINUATION

.........................................................................121 Education Administration No. 36763: R277-419 Pupil Accounting

.................................................................................................................121 No. 36764: R277-420Aiding Financially Distressed School Districts

....................................................................121 No. 36765: R277-423 Delivery of FlowThrough Money

........................................................................................122 No. 36766: R277-424 Indirect Costs for State Programs

....................................................................................... 122 No. 36767: R277-426 Definition of Private and Non-Profit Schools for Federal Program

Services

................................................................................................................................................................123 No. 36768: R277-454 Construction Management ofSchool Building Projects

......................................................123 Financial Institutions Banks No. 36714: R333-7 Investment by a State-Chartered Bank in Shares ofOpen-End

Investment Companies

........................................................................................................................................124 Credit Unions No. 36713: R337-2 Conversion from a Federal to a State-Chartered Credit Union

...............................................124 No. 36712: R337-5Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

- Credit Unions

..........................................................125 Natural Resources Wildlife Resources No. 36747: R657-12 Hunting and Fishing Accommodations for People With Disabilities

......................................125 Transportation Preconstruction, Right-of-WayAcquisition No. 36756: R933-5 Utah-FederalAgreement forthe Control ofOutdoorAdvertising

............................................126

ii 

### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, October0I.2012.Vol. 2012. No. 19

### TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES

...................................................................................................................................127

RULES INDEX BYAGENCY (CODE NUMBER) AND BY KEYWORD (SUBJECT)

.........................................................................................................................................................129



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, October 01. 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 iiiNOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

o erations were identified as a source of direct particulate e ·ssions; therefore, the Division of Air Quality began wo ing with the Association of General Contractors i Octo er 2011 to evaluate the efficiency and co t effect1 eness of different controls for the aggreg e proces ing industry. This rule addresses controls for nfugitive ources, including aggregate processing equip ent, concrete atch plants, and hot mix asphalt plants.
OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: T e rule

acity limits for aggregate processing e uipment I crushers will be required to meet opacity limit of 12%; I screens will be required to meet n opacity limit of 7%; an all conveyortransfer points will b required to meet an opacit limit of 7%. Concrete batch lant opacity limits are establi hed at 7% opacity. The fil rable PM2.5 emission limit fro a hot mix asphalt plant ryer is 0.024 grains per dscf. Fr November 1to March ,the production of material at hot mi asphalt plants is restri ed to 50% ofthe plant's rated capacity uring the times that acilities are using afuel otherthan natur gas or liquified pe oleum gas.

MATERIALS INCORPORAT

ANTICIPATED COST OR S,A; NG TO: 

### +THE STATE BUDGET: A addi ·anal costs to administer this rule at the Division o Air Qua ·ty are expected to be minimal; therefore, there e no antic ated costs or savings to the state budget. 

### + LOCAL GOVERNME S: This rule oes not create any new requirements for I cal government; therefore there are no anticipated costs or avings. 

### + SMALL BUSINES S: Sources that a unable to meet the emission stand ds established in this ule will have to take action to m et them. There are everal control strategies a sour can choose to impleme t to meet the standard; therefqfe, it is difficult to estimate t e anticipated additional costs

## t6 small businesses. 

### + PERSONS/ OTHER THAN SMALL B INESSES,**BUSINESS~,'** OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL NTITIES: This rule ap 1es to all crushers, screens, conveyo , hot mix asphalt pla ts, and concrete batch plants. Ther are no anticipated costs or savings to persons other tha small businesse ,businesses, or local government entities.
COSTS FOR AFFECTED Sour that are unable to meet the emission stand ds estab shed in this rule will have to take action to meet the

. Ther are several control strategies a source can choose imp ment to meet the standard; therefore, it is difficult t es mate the anticipated additional costs.

/46 DARFileNo. 36740

C MMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON Fl AL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINE Sou s that are unable to meet the emission sta dards estab hed in this rule will have to take action to me t them. There e several control strategies a source can oose to impleme to meet the standard; therefore, it is difficult to estimate t e anticipated additional costs this ru may have on business s.
THE FULL T T OF THIS RULE MAY INSPECTED, DURING REGU R BUSINESS HOURS, ENVIRO MENTAL QUALITY AIR QUAL.:TY FOURTH FOOR 195 N 1950

# W SALT LAKE

### C~, UT 8411 -3085 or at the Divisio\ofAdmi 1strative Rules.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REG R ING THIS RULE TO: • Mark Berger by phone at 01-536-4000, by FAX at 801- 536-0085, or by Internet E- i t mberger@utah.gov

INTERESTED SONS MAY ,A; END A PUBLIC HEARING REGA ING THIS RULE: 

### :OO AM, Bridgerland A lied Technology 600 W, Rooms 171 Dand Logan, UT • 10/16/201 11 :00 AM, Mountainland ssociation of Governmen , 586 E 800 N, Orem, UT • 10/17/2 2 02:00 PM, Utah Department of vironmental Quality, 1 5 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT • 10/17 012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Envirpnmental Qualit, 195 N 1950W, Room No.1015, SLC, UT '\
RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 12/06/20\
UTHORIZED BY: Bryce Bird, Director

R307. Environmental Quality,AirQuality. R307-312. Aggregate Processing Operations for PM2.5 NonattainmentAreas. R307-312-l. Purpose. R307-312 establishes emission standards for sources in the aggregate processing industry including aggregate processing eQuipmenl hotmix asphaltplants. and concretebatch plants,
R307-312-2. Applicability. ()) R307-312 applies to all crushers screens conyeyors hotmix asphalt plants and concrete batch plants located wjthin Box Elder. Cache Davis SaltLake Tooele 

### Utah. orWeber counties. (2\ The provisions of R307-312 do not aooly to temporary hotmix asphaltplants.
R307-312-3. Definitions. The following definitions apply to R307-312:

UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, October01, 2012,Vol. 2012, No. 19DARFileNo. 36740

"Concrete batch olant" means any facility used to manufacture concretebymixing aggregate with cement. "Conveyor" means a device for transporting nonmetallic materials from onepiece ofequipmentto another. "Crusher" means a machine used to crush any nonmetallic minerals. "Hot mix asphalt plant" means anY facility used to manufacture hot mix asphalt by heating and drying aggregate and mixingwith asphaltcements. ''Nonmetallic mineral" has the same definition 

### as defined in 40 CFR60.671. "Screen" means a device for separating nonmetallic minerals according to size by passing undersize material through
one ormore mesh surfaces in series. and retaining oversize material
on the mesh surfaces. "Temporary" means notmore than 180 operating days and notmore than 365 calendardays.

R307-312-4. VisibleEmissions. (!) Visible emissions from sources subject to R307-312 shall not exceedthe opacity limits 

### as specified in Table I.

TABLE 1 CATEGORY OPACITY LIMIT

Crushers 12% Screens 7% Conveyor transfer points 7% Concrete batch pl ants 7%
(2) Opacity Observation. (a) Opacity observations ofemissions shall be conducted accordingto 40 CFR 60 AppendixA. Method 9.

8307-312-6. ComplianceSchedule. (!) All sources subject to R307-3l2-4 or R307-312-5(2) shall be in compliancewith thisrule byJune 7. 2013. C2l All sources subject to R307-312-5(J) that begin_ construction prior to June 7. 2013. shall submit test results demonstrating compliance with R307-312-5(1) to the director by December 14. 2015. (3) All sources subject to R307-312-5(1) that begin_ construction on or after June 7. 2013 shall submit test results demonstrating compliance with R307-312-5(1) 

### to the director no laterthan 180 days afterinitial startup.



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, October01, 2012,Vol. 2012, No. 19 NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

KEY: airpollution. aggregate. asphalt. concrete DateofEnactment orLast SubstantiveAmendment: 2012 Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-101: 19-2-104: 19-2-109


# Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

# R307-334 missions Standards: lndustri Baking Ovens

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE (New Rule) DAR FILE NO.: 36739

FILED: 09/06/2012
RULE ANALYSIS THE RULE OR RE ON FOR THE CHANGE: In 06, EPA tightened t e 24-hour PM2.5 national ambient air quality standar from 65 to 35 micrograms per cu ·c meter. CurrentlY. seven Utah counties have been found by PAto not meet t is standard. Industrial baking ovens emit vol tile organic co pounds (VOCs), which are precursors to the rmation of M2.5. This rule for the PM2.5 state implement tion plan ill lower VOCs that are emitted from industrial king o ens by requiring them to implement control measur s.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE CHANGE: This rule requires owners and operators of ind trial baking ovens that process yeast leavened products, h v a**combin~d** rated heat input capacity equal to or great tha three m1ll1on BTU per hour, and that have 25 tons p r year f voe emissions to use a control system that redu s voe missions by 90% or more. Owners and operators re also re uired to maintain records for a minimum of two ears that th control system is being operated and m ntained in ccordance with the manufacturer rec mendations a d is meeting the continuous emissi n reduction of 90%. The estimated cost on sources to co ply with this rule varie with EPA estimating the cost to be$ ,740 perton ofvoes re oved while industry reporting the st wouId be somewhere round $9,735 per ton of VOC removed. That is why ring the public comment pe 1od, the division is asking for ost information from indust

. The Division of Air Quality st ff will evaluate cost info ation received during the comme t period and make a r commendation to the Board.
STATU ORY OR CONSTITUTIONALAUTHOR! THIS ULE: Section 19-2-104
AN ICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: 

### + HE STATE BUDGET: There may be a slight incr se in

ministrative costs to enforce this rule; however, cos e minimal and will not result in increased costs to the budget.NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

A\ TICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: • E STATE BUDGET: The majority ofthe requirements in this ule were already found in the Utah Air Quality rule, Rul R30 340, which has been proposed to be repeale

. There re, there are no anticipated costs or savings to e state dget. (DAR NOTE: The proposed repeal of ule R307-3 is under DAR No. 36725 is this issue, Octob r 1, 2012, of e Bulletin.) • LOCAL OVERNMENTS: The majority ofthe requir ments in this rule were already found in the Utah Air Qua ty rule, Rule R307- 40, which has been proposed to be pealed. Therefore, th re are no anticipated costs or savin s to local government. • SMALL BU NESSES: Anticipated cost to sources is approximately $ 440 perton

## voe removed. • PERSONS THER THAN SMALL SINESSES, BUSINESSES, 

### 0 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, L ENTITIES: This rule applies to owners and operators of aper, film, and foil coatings operati ns that emit 2.7 tons f 

## voe per year. There are no anticip ted costs or saving to persons other than small business , businesses, or local government entities.
COMPLIANCE COSTS

COMMENTS BY THE DE ART. ENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE A HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The cost to business to comply th this rule is approximately $1,440 perton 

## voe removed.

DIRECT QUESTION REGARDING THIS • Mark Berger by hone at 801-536-4000, y FAX at 801- 536-0085, or by In rnet E-mail at mberger@u h.gov
INTERESTED P RSONS MAY PRESENTTHEI VIEWS ON THIS RULE B SUBMITIING WRITIEN COM ENTS NO LATER THAN T 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
INTEREST PERSONS MAY ATIEND HEARING EGARDING THIS RULE: • 10/15/2 12 11 :00 AM, Bridgerland Applied Tee ology College, 301 N600 W, Rooms 171 D and E, Logan, • 10/1 /2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Associatio Gover ents, 586 E800 N, Orem, UT • 10/1 /2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Environme Qual' , 195 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT • 1 17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environment Qu lity, 195 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT R307. Environmental Quality,AirQuality. R307-344. Paper. Fjlm. and Foil Coatings. R307-344-I. Purpose. DARFile No. 36726

The pumose of this rule is to limit volatile organic compound fVOCl emissions from roll knife. and rotogravure coaters and drying ovens ofpaper film. and foil coating operations,
R307-344-2. Applicability. R307-344 applies to paper. film. and foil coating operations. including related cleaning activities that have the potential to emit 2,7 tons per year of

## voe and that are located in Box Elder. Cache Davis. Salt Lal<e. Tooele !Jtah and Weber**~** R307-344-3. Definitions. The following additional definitions apply to R307-344: "Coating" means a protective. functional. or decorative film applied in a thin layer to a surface. This term often applies to paints such as lacquers or enamels. It is also used to refer to films applied to paper. plastics, or foil. "Foil coating" means a coating applied in a web coating process on any foil substrate other than paper or fabric including. but not limited to. typewriter ribbons photographic film. magnetic tape and metal foil gift wrap but excluding coatings applied to packaging used exclusively for food and health care products for human and animal consumption. "Knife coating" means the application of a coating material to a substrate by means ofdrawing the substrate beneath a blade that spreads the coating evenly overthe width ofthe substrate. "Paper coating" means unifonn distribution of coatings put on paper. film foils and pressure sensitive tapes regardless of substrate, Related web coating processes on plastic film and decorative coatings on metal foil are included in this definition. Paper coating covers saturation operations as well as coating operations. "Roll coating" means the application ofa coating material to a substrate by means ofhard rubber orsteel rolls "Roll printing" means the application of words designs and pictures to a substrate usually by means of a series of hard rubber orsteel rolls each with onlypartial coverage. "Rotogravure coating" means the application ofa uniform layer ofmaterial across the entire width ofthe web to substrate by
means ofa roll coating technique in which the pattern to be applied is etched on the coating roll. The coating material is picked up in these recessed areas and is transferred to the substrate, "Saturation" means dipping the web into abath. "Web" means a continuous sheetofsubstrate,
R307-344-4. Emission Standards. Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with a VOC content in excess ofthe amounts specified in Table 1or shall
use an add-on control device as specified in R307-344-6.



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, October 01, 2012,Vol. 2012, No. 19DARFileNo. 36726

Paper. Film. and Foil Coating Limitations (va1ues in pounds voe per pound of coating. minus water. as app1 iedl

COATING CATEGORY voe EMISSION RATES Paper. film and foil 0.08
Pressure sensitive tape and label 

### o. 067

8307-344-5. WorkPractices and Recordkeeping. (!) Control techniqyes and work practices are to be implemented at all times to reduce 

## voe emissions from fugitive type sources Control techniQues and workpractices include: fa) Usingtight fitting covers for open tanks: fb) Using covered containers for solventwiping cloths: (c) Usingcollection hoods for areas where solvent is used for cleanup· Cd) Minimizing spills of VOC-containing cleaning materials:(el Conveying VOC-containing materials from one location to another in closed containers orpipes: 

## m Cleaning spray g\l!1S in enclosed systems: and (g) Usingrecycled solvents for cleaning (2) The owneror operator shall maintain records from the manufacturer that demonstrate compliance with the emission standards ofR307-344-4.

8307-344-6. OptionalAdd-On Controls. (I) The owneroroperatormay install and maintain an incinerator. carbon adsorption or any other add-on emission control device. provided that the emission control device will attain at least 90%efficiencyperformance. (2) The owner or operator of a control device shall_ provide certification from the manufacturer that the emission control system will attain reQuired efficiency perfonnance (3) Emission control systems shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum oftwo years records ofoperating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that the eQUipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturerrecommendations.

8307-344-7. ComplianceSchedule. (I) All sources in Davis and Salt Lake CO\l!1ties are_ subjectto thisrule upon the effective date. (2) Sources in Box Elder Cache. Tooele 

### Utah and Weber coynties shall be in compliancewiththe rule by January I. 2014.

KEY: YOCemission. papercoating. film coating. foil coating DateofEnactmentorLast SubstantiveAmendment: 20I2 Authorizing. and Implemented orInterpretedLaw: 19-2-1040) (a}



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, October01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 NOTICES OFPROPOSED RULES



### NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE 

### (New Rule) DAR FILE NO.: 36727

FILED: 09/06/2012


### RULE ANALYSIS PURP SE OF THE RULE OR REASON F R THE In 2006, EPA tightened the 24-h national ambient air quality standard from microgra s per cubic meter. Currently, seven ah counties have bee found by EPA to not meet this sta ard. Fabric and vinyl c ting operations emit volatile orga c compounds (VOCs), whi are precursors to the formation f PM2.5. This rule for the P 2.5 State Implementation Pia ·11 lowerVOCs that are emitt from fabric and vinyl coati g operations, as well as clarify r ulatory requirements to th industry.
SUMMARY OF E RULE OR CHAN : This rule applies to fabric and vi I coating operatic s, including related cleaning activities, at have the pote ial to emit 2.7 tons of volatile organic co ounds (VOC) er year and that are located in Box Elder, ache, Davis, alt Lake, Tooele, Utah, and Weber counties. The rul establishes reasonably available control techn logy req 1rements to reduce voe emissions. Owners and perator. have the option to reduce voes by applying coatin with e voe limits established in the rule or to use add-on ntr. Is to achieve at least a 90% VOC reduction. During th blic comment period, the Air Quality Board is reque ting public input on the appropriateness of applying ·s rule in Tooele and Box Elder counties.

ANTICIPATED COST R SAVINGS 0: • THE STATE BUD 

### T: The majori ofthe requirements in this rule were alrea y found in the Ut Air Quality rule, Rule R307-340, which has been propo d to be repealed. Therefore, there re no anticipated co ts or savings to the state budget. ( AR NOTE: The prop sed repeal of Rule R307-340 is u er DAR No. 36725 is thi issue, October 1, 2012, ofthe B letin.) 

### +LOCAL GO ERNMENTS: The majority o he requirements in this rule ere already found in the Utah ir Quality rule, Rule R307 0, which has been proposed be repealed. Therefore, there are no anticipated costs or s vings to local governm nt. • SMA BUSINESSES: Anticipated cost to sources is $3,500 erton voe removed. 

### + P SONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUS ESSES, BUS ESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL TITIES: Thi rule applies to fabric and vinyl coatings operat1 ns that e . 2.7 tons of VOC per year. There are no ant ipated c ts or savings to persons other than small busin sses,

sinesses, or local government entities.

67

### NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

C PLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: com liance cost to implement the requirements of this rule s appro imately $3,500 perton

## voe removed.
COMM TS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD 0 FISCAL I PACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSI The cost to usiness to comply with this rule is app $3,500 pert 

## voe removed.
THE FULL TE T OF THIS RULE MAY BE DURING REGU R BUSINESS HOURS, AT: ENVIRO ENTAL QUALITY AIR QUAL FOURTH FL.: OR 195 N 1950 SALT LAKE Cl

INTERESTED PERSONS 'AY P THIS RULE BY SUBMI LATER THAN AT 5:00 P
INTERESTED PE A PUBLIC HEARING REGAR 

### + 10/15/2012 11: 0 AM, Bridgerland A College, 1301 N 00 W, Rooms 171 D and 

### + 10/16/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Governments 86 E 800 N, Orem, UT 

### + 10/17/201 02:00 PM, Utah Department of vironmental Quality, 19 N 1950W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT 

### + 10/17/ 12 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Env1 Quality, 95 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
ULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:

R307. Environmental Quality,AirQuality. R307-345. FabricandVinyl Coatings. R307-345-1. Purpose. 

### The puroose of this rule is to limit volatile organic compound CVOC) emissions from fabric and vinyl coating operations.
R307-345-2. Applicability. 

### R307-345 applies to fabric and vinyl coating operations. including related cleaning activities. which use roll. knife or rotogravure coaters and drying ovens thathave the potential to emit 2.7 tons per year ofYOC and that are located in Box Elder. Cache. Davis SaltLake.Tooele. Utah andWebercounties.
R307-345-3. Definitions. 

### The following additional definitions apply to R307-345:

68 DARFile No. 36727

"Coating" means a protective. functional. or decorative film applied in athin layerto asurface including lacquers enamels. latexes. acrylics. polyYinyl chloride. polyurethanes. natural and synthetic rubbers. It also applies to films applied to paper. plastics. 

### m:..fui.L. "Fabric coating" means the coating or saturation of a textile substrate with a knife. roll or rotogravure coater to impart characteristics that are not initially present. such as strength. stabilitv. water or acid repellency. or appearance. Fabric coatings
can include. but are not limited to industrial and electrical tapes. tie cord utility meter seals. imitation leathers. taroaulins. shoe material. and upholstery fabrics "Knife coating" means the application of a coating material to asubstrate by means ofdrawing the substrate beneath a blade thatspreads the coating evenly overthe width ofthe substrate. "Roller coating" the coating material is applied to the moving fabric. in a direction opposite to the movement of the substrate. by hard rubber orsteel rolls "Rotogravure coating" means the application ofauniform layer ofmaterial across the entire width ofthe web to substrate by
means ofaroll coating technique in which the pattern to be applied is etched on the coating roll. The coating material is picked up in. these recessed areas and is transferred tothe substrate, "Vinyl coating" means applying adecorative orprotective top coat. orprinting on vinyl coated fabric orvinyl sheets.

R307-345-4. Emission Standards. (I) 

### Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with.
aVOC contentin excess ofthe amounts specified in Table I orshall
use an add-on control device as specified in R307-345-6.

TABLE 1 Fabric and Vinyl Coating Limitations (values in pounds voe per gallon of coating. minus water. as applied)
COATING CATEGTORY voe EMISSION RATES
Fabric 2.9
Vin 1 3.8 

### (2) Organosol and plastisol coatings shall not be used to. bubble emissions from vinyl printing and top coating.
R307-345-5. WorkPractices and Recordkeeping. (Il 

### Control techniques and work practices are to be implemented at all times to reduce 

## voe emissions from fugitive type sources. Control techniques and workpractices include: (a) Tightfitting covers for opentanks or<lrums: Cb) Covered containers for solventwiping cloths; (c) Collection hoods for areas where solvent is used for.
fdl Coveredmixing tanks: and (e) Covered hoods and oven routed to add-on control devices which may include. but are not limited to. after burners. thermal incinerators catalytic oxidation. orcarbon adsorption. (2) 

### The owneroroperator shall maintain records from the manufacturer that demonstrate compliance with the emission standards ofR307-348-4,

UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, 

### October01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19DARFileNo. 36727

8307-345-6. OptionalAdd-On Controls. The owneroroperatormay install and maintain an incinerator. carbon adsorption or any other add-on emission control device. provided that the emission control deyice will attain at least 90%efficiencyperformance. (2) The owner or operator of a control device shall_ provide certification from the manufacturer that the emission control system will attainrequired efficiencyperformance. (3) Emission control systems shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum oftwo years records ofoperating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that the equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturerrecommendations.

R307-345-7. ComplianceSchedule. (1) All sources in Davis and Salt Lake counties are subjecttothis rule upon the effective date. (2) All sources within Box Elder. Cache. Tooele. Utah and Weber counties shall be in compliancewith this rule by January 1.2014.

KEY: air pollution. emission controls. fabric coating. vinyl .ma.ting Date ofEnactmentorLastSubstantiveAmendment: 2012 Authorizing. and Implemented orInterpretedLaw: 19-2-104Cl) 

# w
Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

# R307-346

TICE OF PROPOSED RU (New Rule) AR FILE NO.: 3672

LED: 09/06/201


### R PURPOSE OF THE CHANGE: In 2006,

SUMMARY THE RULE OR CHANGE: This le applies to metal fu iture surface coating operations, includ related cleaning ctivities, that have the potential to emit 2. tons of volatile organic compounds (VOC) per year and th are locat in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele, ah, Weber counties. The rule establishes reasona

UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, October01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 NOTICES OFPROPOSED RULES

available control technology requirements to reduce V C

missions. Owners and operators have the option to red ce

Cs by applying coatings with the VOC limits establish d in th rule or to use add-on controls to achieve at least 90% V reduction. During the public comment period, e Air Qua "ty Board is requesting public input the appr riateness of applying this rule in Tooele and x Elder counti s.
STATU RY OR CONSTITUTIONALAUTHOR! THIS RU E: Subsection 19-2-104(1)(a)
DCOST OR SAVINGS TO: 

### +THE STA BUDGET: The majority ofthe equirements in this rule wer already found in the Utah Air uality rule, Rule R307-340, ich has been proposed o be repealed. Therefore, ther are no anticipated costs or savings to the state budget. AR NOTE: The propo ed repeal of Rule R307-340 is und r DAR No. 36725 is t s issue, October 1, 2012, ofthe Bullet .) 

### +LOCAL GOVERN ENTS: The majo ty ofthe requirements in this rule were air ady found in th Utah Air Quality rule, Rule R307-340, whi has been pr. posed to be repealed. Therefore, there are n anticipated costs or savings to local government. 

### + SMALL BUSINESSE : Anti pated cost to sources is $2,020 perton 

## voe remo ed. 

### + PERSONS OTHER TH BUSINESSES, OR LOCA This rule applies to metal SMALL BUSINESSES, OVERNMENTAL ENTITIES:
emit 2.7 tons of VOC per ar. There are no anticipated costs or savings to perso s ther than small businesses, businesses, or local gove en entities.

COMMENTS BY E DEPARTM T HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT T E RULE MAY HA E ON BUSINESSES: The cost to busine s to comply with this ule is approximately $2,020 perton V removed.
THE FULL TE T OF THIS RULE MAY E INSPECTED, DURING REG LAR BUSINESS HOURS, A · ENV ONMENTAL QUALITY Al UALITY F RTH FLOOR 1 5 N 1950 W

ALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-3085 ratthe Division ofAdministrative Rules.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE T 

### + Ma Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801- 536- 085, or by Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov
IN ERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENTTHEIR VIEW ON T IS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS 0 JERTHAN AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

R307. Environmental Quality,AirQuality. R307-346. Metal FurnitureSurface Coatings. R307-346-1. Purpose. The pumose of this rule is 

### to limit volatile organic comoound CVOC) emissions from metal furniture surface coating operations. R307-346-2. Applicability. R307-346 applies to the application areas flash-offareas. and ovens of metal furniture coating lines involved in prime and top-coat or single coat operations. including related cleaning activities. that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons per year of

## voe' and that are located in Box Elder. Cache. Davis. Salt Lake. Tooele

.. Utah andWeber counties.

R307-346-3. Exemptions. 

## m The requirements of R307-346 do not apply to the. following: (a) Stencil coatings: Cb) Safety-indicating coatings: (c) Solid-film lubrican(S: (dl Electrical-insulating and thermal-conductingcoatings: (e) Touch-up and repair coatings: or (f) Coating applications utilizinghand-held aerosol cans.
R307-346-4. Definitions. "Air dried coating" means coatings that are dried by the
use ofair or a forced warm air at temperatures up to 194 degrees Fahrenheit. "Application area" means the area where the coating is applied by spraying. dipping. orflow coatingtechniques. "Baked coating" means a coating that is cured at a temperature atorabove 194 degrees Fahrenheit. "Coating" means a protective. functional. or decorative film applied in a thin layerto a surface. This term applies to pain(S. sealants. caulks. inks. adhesives and maskan(S. "Extreme performance coatings" means coatings designed for harsh exposure orextreme environmental conditions. "Maskants" means a material that protects a metal surface during the etchingprocess. "Metal furniture coating" means the surface coating of any furniture made ofmetal oranY metal Partthatwill be assembled

70 DARFile No. 36728

with other metal wood fabric plastic. or glass parts to form a furniture piece.

R307-346-5. Emission Standards. Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with a VOC content in excess ofthe amounts specified in Table I or shall.
use an add-on control device as specified in R307-346-7.

METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING voe LIMITS (values in pounds of VOC per gallon Of coating. minus water, as applie gi
COATING CATEGORY voe EMISSION RATE
Baked Air Dried

Genera1, One CQ!]ponent 2.3 2.3 General, Multi-Component 2.3 2.8

Extreme High Gloss 3.0 2.8

Extreme Performance 3.0 3.5

Heat Resistant 3.0 3.5
Metallic 3.5 3.5

Pretreatment Coatings 3.5 3.5
Solar Absorbent 3.0 3.5
R307-346-6. WorkPractices. (1) Theowneror operator shall: Ca) Store all VOC-containing coatings thinners. and cleaningmaterials in closed containers: fb) Minimize spills ofVOC-containing coatings. thinners. and cleaning materials: (cl Clean up spills immediately: fdl Convey any coatings. thinners. and cleaning materials in closed containers orpipes: (el Close mixing vessels that contain VOC coatings and othermaterials exceotwhen specifically in use: and 

### ID Minimize usage of solvents during cleaning of storage mixing. and conveyingequipment. (2) The owneroroperator shall maintain records from the manufacturer that demonstrates compliance with the emission standards ofR307-348-4.

R307-346-7. OptionalAdd-On Controls. flI The owner oroperatormav install and maintain an incinerator. carbon adsorption. or any other add-on emission control device provided that the emission control device will attain at least 90%efficiencyperformance. (2) The owner or operator of a control device shall_ provide certification from the manufacturer that the emission control system will attain req_uired efficiencyperformance. (3) Emission control systems shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer reco1mnendations. The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum oftwo years records ofoperating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that

UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, October 

### OJ, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19DAR File No. 36728

the equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturerrecommendations.
R307-346-8. Compliance Schedule. (I) All sources in Davis and Salt Lake counties 

### are_ subjectto this rule as ofthe effective date (2) Sources in Box Elder. Cache 

### Utah. Tooele. and Weber counties shall be in compliance with the rule by January I 2014.

KEY: air pollution. emission controls. surface**coatin~.** metal furniture Date ofEnactmentorLastSubstantiveAmendment: 2012**Authorizin~.** and Implemented orInterpretedLaw: 19-2-104(1) .(JU


# Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

# R307-347 geAppliance Surface Coatin

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE (New Rule) DAR FILE NO.: 36729

FILED: 09/06/2012
RULE ANALYSIS PURPOSE OF E RULE OR RE SON FOR THE CHANGE: In 200 EPA tightened e 24-hour PM2.5 national ambient ai quality stand d from 65 to 35 micrograms per cubic ter. Current , seven Utah counties have been found by ER to not m t this standard. Large appliance surface coatin operati ns emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which e pr cursors to the formation of PM2.5. This rule for the P

. State Implementation Plan will lowervoes that are emitte from large appliance surface coating operations, as well a c rify regulatory requirements to the industry.
SUMMARY OF THE RU OR CH GE: This rule applies to large appliance su ace coating**operati~ns, incl~ding**  related cleaning activiti s, that have th potential to emit 2.7 tons of volatile organ(icompounds (VO ) per year and that are located in Box /Ider, Cache, Davis, alt Lake, Tooele, Utah and Weber c6unties. The rule esta ·shes reasonably

### avail~ble control echnology requirements reduce voe emissions. O rs and operators have the o tion to reduce voes by apply' g coatings with the voe limits stablished in the rule or to se add-on controls to achieve at ast a 90% VOC reduct' n. During the public comment pen d, the Air Quality ard is requesting public input on the appropria ness of applying this rule in Tooele and B Elder countie
STAT TORY OR CONSTITUTIONALAUTHORIZATION THI RULE: Subsection 19-2-104(1)(a)



### TAHSTATEBULLETIN, October 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 NOTICES OF PROPOSEDRULES

NTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: 

### +THE STATE BUDGET: The majority of the requiremen th rule were already found in the Utah Air Quality rule, ule R3 7-340, which has been proposed to be rep aled. The fore, there are no anticipated costs or savings o the state udget. (DAR NOTE: The proposed repeal f Rule R307- 40 is under DAR No. 36725 is this issue, 0 ober 1, 2012, the Bulletin.) 

### +LOCA GOVERNMENTS: The majority ofthe re uirements in this ru were already found in the Utah Air uality rule, Rule R30 -340, which has been proposed to e repealed. Therefore, ere are no anticipated costs or s ings to local government. 

### + SMALL B SINESSES: Anticipated cos to sources is $2,020 perto voe removed

. 

### + PERSONS OTHER THAN SMAL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, R LOCAL GOVERNM NTAL ENTITIES: This rule applies o fabric and vinyl coat' gs operations that emit 2.7 tons of QC per year. Ther are no anticipated costs or savings t persons other th n small businesses, businesses, or local overnment entiti

.

COMMENTS BY THE EPA TMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RUI.; M Y HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The cost to business to com I with this rule is approximately $2,020 perton voe remove

DIRECT QUEST! S REGARDING TH RULE TO: 

### + Mark Berger b phone at 801-536-40 0, by FAX at 801- 536-0085, or by ternet E-mail at mberge utah.gov
INTERESTED ERSONS MAY PRESENTT EIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE Y SUBMITTING WRITTEN C MMENTS NO LATER THA AT 5:00 PM ON 10/31/2012
INTEREST. D PERSONS MAY ATTEND PUBLIC HEARIN REGARDING THIS RULE: 

### + 10/15/. 012 11 :00 AM, Bridgerland Applied echnology College 1301 N600 W, Rooms 171 Dand E, Loga , UT 

### + 10/ 6/2012 11:00 AM, Mountainland Assoc tion of Gove ments, 586 E 800 N, Orem, UT 

### + 10 7/2012 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Enviro Qu ity, 195 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT 

### + /17/2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Environ ality, 195 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT

71NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

8307. Environmental Quality,AirQuality. 8307-347. LargeAppliance SurfaceCoatings. R307-347-1. Purpose. The purpose of this rule is to reduce yolatile organic compound IVOC) emissions from large appliance surface coating operations.

R307-347-2. Applicability. R307-347 applies to lame appliance coating operations including related cleaning activities. that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons a year ofvoe and that are located in Box Elder. Cache Davis Salt Lake Tooele.

### Utah and Weber counties.

R307-347-3. Exemptions. (!) The requirements of R307-347 do not apply to the. following:(al Stencil coatings· (b) Safety-indicating coatings: (cl Solid-film lubricants: (dl Electric-insulating and thermal-conducting coatings: (el Touch-up and repair coatings· or <O Coating ap,plication utilizinghand-held aerosol cans
8307-347-4. Definitions. The following additional definitions apply to R307-347· "Air dried coating" means coatings that are dried by the
use ofair or a forced warm air at temperatures up to 194 degrees Fahrenheit "Baked coating" means a coating that is cured at a temperature at or above 198 degrees Fahrenheit "Coating" means a protective. functional. or decorative film applied in a thin layer to a surface. This term often applies to paints such 

### as lacquers or enamels. It is also used to refer to films applied to paper. plastics orfoil "Extreme performance coatings" means coatings designed for harsh exposure orextreme environmental conditions. "Large appliances" means doors. cases lids panels. and interior support parts ofresidential and commercial washers dryers. ranges refrigerators. freezers water heaters. dishwashers. trash compactors. air conditioners and other similarproducts.

R307-347-5. Emission Standards. Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with a vOC content in excess ofthe amounts specified in Table I or shall.
use an add-on control device 

### as specified in R307-347-7.

Large Appliance Coating Limitations (values in pounds voe per gallon of coating. mjnus water. as applied)
COATING CATEGORY voe EMISSION RATES
Baked Air Oried

General

. one component 2.3 2.3

72 DARFile No. 36729

General • multi-component 2.3 2.8
Extreme high gloss 3.0 2.8
Extreme performance 3.0 3.5
Heat resistance 3.0 3.5
Solar absorbent 3.0 3.5
Metallic 3.5 3.5
Pretreatment coatings 3.5 3.5
R307-347-6. WorkPractices andRecordkeeping. IIl The owneroroperatorshall: la) Store all voe-containing coatings. thinners. and cleaningmaterials in closedcontainers: (bl Minimize spills ofVOC-containing coatings thinners and cleaningmaterials: lcl Clean up spills immediately· ldl Convey anY coatings. thinners. and cleaning materials in closed containers orpipes· lel Close mixing vessels that contain VOC coatings and othermaterials exceptwhen specifically in use: and <O Minimize usage of solvents during cleaning of storage mixing and conveyingequipment (2) The owneroroperatorshallmaintainrecords from the manufacturer that demonstrates compliance with the emission standards ofR307-348-5

8307-347-7. OptionalAdd-On Controls. IIl The owneroroperatormay install and maintain an incinerator carbon adsorption. orany other add-on emission control device proyided that the emission control deyice will attain at least 90%efficiencyperformance.

· (2) The owner or operator of a control device shall_ provide certification from the manufacturer that the emission control system will attain required efficiencyperformance. (3) Emission control systems shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum oftwo years records ofoperating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that the equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturerrecommendations.

8307-347-8. ComplianceSchedule. (I) All sources in Davis and Salt Lal<e counties 

### are subjectto this rule as ofthe effectivedate ofthis rule. (2) Sowces in Box Elder. Cache Tooele. Utah and Weber counties shall be in compliancewith this rule byJanuary I 2014.

KEY: air pollution. emission controls. large appliance. surface**~** DateofEnactmentorLastSubstantiveAmendment: 2012 Authorizing. and Implemented orInterpretedLaw: 19-2-104(1) 

### Lal

UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, October01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19DARFile No. 36730


# Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

# R307-348 Magnet Wire Coatings

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE 

### (New Rule) DAR FILE NO.: 36730

FILED: 09/06/2012
RULE ANALYSIS PURPOSE THE RULE OR REASON FOR THE CHANGE: In 2006, EPA tightened the 2 hour PM2.5 national ambie t air quality standard fro 65 to 35 micrograms per bic meter. Currently, seve Utah counties have been found EPA to not meet this s ndard. Magnet wire coating oper tions emit volatile or anic compounds (VOCs}, which are p cursors to the forma on of PM2.5. This rule forthe PM2.5 St te Implementation an will lowerVOCs that are emitted from agnet wire coati operations, as well as clarify regulatory req irements to the ndustry.
SUMMARY OF THE RU E OR CH GE: This rule applies to**r:n~~net** wire coating op rations, i eluding related cleaning act1v1t1es, that have the po ential t emit 2.7 tons of volatile organic compounds (VOC) er y r and that are located in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Sal La ,Tooele, Utah, and Weber counties. The rule establish easonably available control technology requirements to re ce VOC emissions. Owners and**.opera~ors** have the optic reduce voes by applying coatings with the voe limits st lished in the rule or to use add-on controls to achieve at le t a 90% voe reduction. During the public comme perio the Air Quality Board is**requesti~g** public input o the ap opriateness of applying this rule in Tooele and Bo Elder cou ies.

ANTICIPATED COS OR SAVINGS TO: +THE STATE BU ET: The majority oft e requirements in this rule were alre dy found in the Utah Air uality rule, Rule R307-340, whic has been proposed t be repealed. Therefore, ther are no anticipated costs or savings to the state budget. DAR NOTE: The proposed peal of Rule R307-340 is der DAR No. 36725 is this issu , October 1, 2012, ofthe ulletin.)**~** LO.CAL G VERNMENTS: The majority ofthe r uirements in this rule were already found in the Utah Air Q ality rule Rule R30 -340, which has been proposed to be epealed'. Therefor , there are no anticipated costs or saving to local govern ent. + SM L BUSINESSES: Anticipated cost to sou $6,56 perton voe removed. RSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINES ES INESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITI 

# s: Th'. rule applies to fabric and vinyl coatings operations t t e 1t 2.7 tons of VOC per year. There are no anticipat



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, October01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

sts or savings to persons other than small busines s b inesses, or local government entities. '
LIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSON

. The comp nee cost to implement the requirements oft s rule is approx1 ately $6,560 perton voe removed.
COMME S BY THE DEPARTMENT HEA ON THE FISCAL IM CT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON SINESSES: The cost to b'usiness to comply with this rule i approximately $6,560 per

### to~OC removed.
THE FULL TEX' OF THIS RULE MA)) BE INSPECTED, DURING REGULA BUSINESS HOUR AT ENVIRON ENTAL QUALITY , . AIR QUALi FOURTH FL R 195 N 1950 W \ SALT LAKE

## ci-r\~T 84 6-3085 or at the Division °'\Ad nistrative Rules.
DIRECT QUESTIONS REGA ING THIS RULE TO: + Mark Berger by phone a 8 1-536-4000, by FAX at 801- 536-0085, or by Internet E- ail

### ~;;,-berger@utah.gov INTERESTED PERSON MAY PR\SENTTHEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUB TTING**WR~~N** COMMENTS NO LATER THAN AT 5:0 MON**10/31/2~2** INTERESTED P SONS MAY A END A PUBLIC HEARING REGA DING THIS RULE: + 10/15/2012 :00 AM, Bridgerland Ap lied Technology College, 1301 600 W, Rooms 171 Dand E, Logan, UT + 10/16/201 11 :00 AM, Mountainland ssociation of Governmen , 586 E 800 N, Orem, UT + 10/17/20 2 02:00 PM, Utah Department of E ironmental Quality, 1 5 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT + 10/17l 012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of**Envi~mental Qualit~**  195 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
THI RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 12/06/201
THORIZED BY: Bryce Bird, Director

R307. Environmental Quality,AirQuality. R307-348. MagnetWire Coatings. R307-348-1. Purpose. The pumose of this rule is to limit volatile organic**comp~und** <VOC) emissions from ovens of magnet wire coating operations.
R307-348-2. Applicability. R307-348 applies to magnet wire coating operations that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons per year of

# voe and are located in Box Elder. Cache. Davis. Salt Lake. Tooele. 

### Utah and Weber counties.

73NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

8307-348-3. Definitions. The following additional definition applies toR307-348: "Magnet wire coating" means the process of applying coating ofelectrical insulating varnish or enamel to aluminum or. copperwire for use in electrical machinery.
8307-348-4. Emission Standards. (() No owner or operator ofa magnet wire coating oven may cause allow or permit discharge into the atmosphere ofanY VOCs in excess of020 kilograms per liter ofcoating fI.7 pounds per gallon) excluding water delivered to the coating applicator from magnet wire coatingqperations. (al Equivalency calculations for cqatings shall be performed in units QfpQUnds V0Cs per gallon QfSQlid rather than PQunds voesper gallQn QfCQating when determining CQmpliance. (b) The equivalentemission limitis 2 2pounds voesper gallon solids. (2) The emjssiqn limitatiqns specified abqve shall be achievedby· fal The application of low solvent cqntent cqating technology: Qr (bl The use ofan add-Qn control device as specified in R307-348-6.
8307-348-5. WorkPractices and Recordkeeping. (]) The owneroroperator shall: (a) Store all VOC-cqntaining coatings and cleaning materials in clqsed cqntainers: (bl Minimize spills of voe-containing CQatings and cleaning materials: (cl Cleanup spills immediately; fdl Cqnvey anY coatings thinners and cleaning materials in clqsed containers orpipes: (e) Close mixing vessels that CQntain voe CQatings and othermaterials exceptwhen specifically in use: and (Q Minimize usage of sqlvents during cleaning of stqrage mixing and conveyingeQuipment. (2) The owneroroperalQr shall maintain records from the manufacturer that demqnstrate compliance with the emissiqn standards qfR307-348-4
8307-348-6. OptionalAdd-On Controls. (1) Theowner m Qperatqrmay install and maintain an incinerator provided that the emissiqn control device will attain at least 90%efficiency performance (2) The qwner or Qperator Qf a cQntrol device shall_ provide certification from the manufacturer that the emissiqn control system will attain reQJ.!ired efficiencyoerformance f3) Emissiqn cqntrol systems shall be Qperated and maintained in accqrdance with the manufacturer recomroendatiqns. The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum oftwo years records ofoperating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that the equipment is being Qperated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturerrecommendations.
R307-348-7. Compliance Schedule. (() All SQurces in Davis and Salt Lake CQunties 

### are_ subjecttQ this rule as ofthe effective date ofthis rule.

74 DARFile No. 36730

(2) Sources in Box Elder. Cache 

### Utah. Tooele. and Weber counties shall be in compliance with this rule by Januarv I. 2014.

KEY: airpollution. emission controls. surface coatini:. mai:net 

### lYi.u Date ofEnactment orLastSubstantiveAmendment: 2012 Authorizini:. and Implemented orInterpretedLaw: 19-2-104<1) 

# w
Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

# R307-349 Flat Wood Panel Coatings

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE (New Rule) 

### DAR FILE NO.: 36731

FILED: 09/06/2012
RULE ANALYSIS THE RULE OR REA ON FOR THE CHANGE: In 06, EPA tightened t e 24-hour PM2.5 national ambient air quality standar from 65 to 35 micrograms per cub meter. Current!>: seven Utah counties have been found by Ato not meett sstandard. Flat wood panel coating operati ns emit vol le organic compounds (VOCs), which are prec rsors to th ormation of PM2.5. This rule for the PM2.5 State plemen tion Plan will lowerVOCs that are emitted from flat ood nel coating operations, as well as clarify regulatory re ents to the industry.
SUMMARY OF THE RULE CHANGE: This rule applies to flat wood panel coati perations, including related cleaning activities, that ha th potential to emit 2.7 tons of volatile organic compou ds (V C) per year and that are located in Box Elder, C che, Dav , Salt Lake, Tooele, Utah and Weber counties. The rule establishes reasonably available control tee nology requir ents to reduce voe emissions. Owners nd operators ha e the option to reduce voes by applying atings with the v limits established in the rule or to use add-on controls to ac ieve at least a 90% VOC reduction. During the public com ent period, the Air Quality Boar is requesting public input on the appropriatene s of applying this rule in Too e and Box Elder counties.
STATUTO Y OR CONSTITUTIONALAUTHOR THIS RU E: Subsection 19-2-104(1)(a)
ANTI ATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: +TH STATE BUDGET: The majority ofthe requir ents in this le were already found in the Utah Air Quality ru , Rule R 7-340, which has been proposed to be re aled. T erefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings the

tate budget. (DAR NOTE: The proposed repeal of ule

UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, October01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19DARFile No. 36731

R 07-340 is under DAR No. 36725 is this issue, October 1, 20 2, ofthe Bulletin.) 

### +L CAL GOVERNMENTS: The majority ofthe requirement in th rule were already found in the Utah Air Quality rul , Rule 307-340, which has been proposed to be repeal Theref e, there are no anticipated costs or saviogs to I cal 

### nt. 

### + SMAL BUSINESSES: Anticipated cost to sour s is $2,110 pe ton

## voe removed. 

### + PERS S OTHER THAN SMALL BUSIN SSES, BUSINESS , OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL E TITIES: This rule ap ·es to flat wood panel coatings aper ions that emit 2.7 tons f VOC per year. There are no nticipated costs or savin s to persons other than small businesses, or I al government entities.

compliance cost to · plement the requireme approximately $2, 11 perton

## voe removed.

THE FULL TEXT OF THI DURING REGULAR BUSIN SS H ENVIRONMENTAL AIR QUALITY FOURTH FLOOR 195 N 1950 W SALT LAKE CITY, UT or atthe Division of mi 'strative Rules. ON THE

THEIR VIEWS ON COMMENTS NO

INTERESTED P A PUBLIC HEARING REGA ING THIS RULE: 

### + 10/15/2012 1 :00 AM, Bridgerland Appli Technology College, 1301 N 00 W, Rooms 171 D and E, L gan, UT 

### + 10/16/2012 11 :00 AM, Mountainland As ciation of Governments, 86 E800 N, Orem, UT 

### + 10/17/201 02:00 PM, Utah Department of Env onmental Quality, 195 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT 

### + 10/17/20 2 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Envir mental Quality, 1 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT

RIZED BY: Bryce Bird, Director



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, October01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

R307. Environmental Quality,AirQuality. R307-349. FlatWood PanelCoatings. R307-349-1. Purpose. The puroose of R307-349 is to limit volatile organic compound <YOC) emissions from flat wood paneling coating filll!!:lli...
R307-349-2. Applicability. R307-349 applies to flat wood paneling coating operations. including related cleaning activities that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons per year ofvoe and that are located in. Box Elder. Cache. Davis. Salt Lake. Tooele. Utah and Weber counties.
R307-349-3. Definitions. The following additional definitions apply to R307-349: "Coating" means a protective. decorative. or functional material applied in a thin layer to a surface Such materials may include paints. topcoats. varnishes. sealers. stains. washcoats. basecoats. inks. and temoorruy protective coatings. "Finishingmaterial" means acoatingused in the flat wood panel industrv. including basecoats. stains. washcoats. sealers. and**~** "Flat wood paneling" means wood paneling products that 

## are any decorative interior. exterior or tileboard £class I hardboard) panel to which a protective. decorative. or functional material or layerhas been applied. "Sealer" means a finishing material used to seal the pores ofa wood substrate before additional coats offinishing material are applied Awashcoatused to optimize aesthetics is not a sealer. "Tileboard" means a premium interior wall paneling product made ofhardboard that meets the specifications for Class I givenbythe standardANSI/AHAA135.4-1995.
R307-349-4. Emission Standards. (J) Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with.
a voe content in excess of 2.1 pounds of voe per gallon excluding water. The equivalent emission limit shall be 2.9 pounds
voesper gallon solids coating· or £2) Each owner or operator shall use an add-on control_ device as specified in R307-349-6.
R307-349-5. WorkPracticeandRecordkeeping. fl) The owner oroperatorshall: fa) Store all VOC-containing coatings. thinners. and cleaningmaterials in closed containers: fb) Minimize spills ofVOC·containingcoatings. thinners. and cleaningmaterials: (c) Clean up spills immediately: (d) Convey anY coatings. thinners and cleaning materials in closed containers orpipes; fe) Close mixing vessels that contain VOC coatings and othermaterials exceptwhen specifically in use: and <O Minimize usage of solvents during cleaning of storage mixing and conveyingofeguipment. (2) The owner orqperator shall maintain records from the manufacturer that demqnstrate compliance with the emission standards ofR307-348-4.

75NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

R307-349-6. OptionalAdd-On Controls. (Il The owneroroperatormay install and maintain an incinerator carbon adsor:ption. orany other add-on emission control device. provided that the emission control device will attain at least 90%efficiency performance. (2) The owner or operator of a control deyice shall_ provide certification from the manufacturer that the emission control system will attainrequired efficiency perfonnaoce. (3) Emission control systems shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recomroendatjons. The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum oftwo years records ofoperating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that the equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturerrecommendations.

R307-349-7. ComplianceSchedule. (!) All sources in Davis and Salt Lake counties are subject to this rule as ofthe effective date ofthis rule. (2! Sources in Box Elder Cache. Tooele Utah and Weber counties shall be in compliancewith this rule byJanuary I. 2014.

KEY: air pollution. emission controls. Oat wood paneling.**~** Date ofEnactmentorLast SubstantiveAmendment: 2012 Authorizing. and Implemented orInterpretedLaw: 19-2-1040) 

# w
Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

# R307-350 cellaneous Metal Parts a Products Coatings

CE OF PROPOSED R'E (New Rule) 

## I D FILE NO.:

## 36~£2**Fl~** 

### D: 

### 09/06/12
RUL NA 

### SIS PURPOSE OF THE RUL: R REASON FOR THE CHANGE: In 2006, EPA t tened the 24-hour PM2.5 national ambient air quar tandard from 65 to 35 micrograms per cubic mete

. Curr tly, seven Utah counties have been found by A to n meet this standard. Miscellaneous metal p s and produ s coating operations emit volatile organ· compounds OCs), which are precursors to the fo ation of PM2.5. This u!e for the PM2.5 State !mplementa . n Plan will lower VOCs hat are emitted from fabric and iny! coating operations, as 

### !! as clarify regulatory req · ements to the industry. applies to misce! neous metal parts coating operations, i uding related eaning activities, that have the potential to e · 2.7 tons volatile organic compounds (VOC) per year and at cated in Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooe

76 DARFile No. 36731**Uta~.** 

### and Weber counties. The rule establishes reasona y va1!ab!e control technology requirements to reduce V C

issions. Owners and operators have the option to re uce Cs by applying coatings with the VOC limits estab!is d in th rule or to use add-on controls to achieve at least 90% VO reduction. During the public comment period, he Air Qua y Board is requesting public input n the appro riateness of applying this rule in Tooele and ox Elder counti

. STATUT RY OR CONSTITUTIONALAUTHOR! THIS**RU~** 

### : Subsection 19-2-104(1)(a)
ANTICIPAT DCOST OR SAVINGS TO: +THE STAT BUDGET: The majority ofthe equirements in this rule were !ready found in the Utah Air uality rule, Rule R307-340, ·ch has been proposed o be repealed. Therefore, ther are no anticipated cost or savings to the state budget. ( AR NOTE: The prop ed repeal of Rule R307-340 is und DAR No. 36725 is t 1s issue, October 1, 2012, ofthe Bulleti . ) +LOCAL GOVERN ENTS: The majo ty ofthe requirements in this rule were air dy found in th Utah Air Quality rule, Rule R307-340, whic has been p posed to be repealed. Therefore, there are n anticipated costs or savings to local government. • SMALL BUSINESSE · between $238 to $6,560 r ton OC removed. These costs are highly dependent on th ind stria! application. + PERSONS OTHER H N SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: This rule applies to mis neous metal part coatings operations that emit 2.7 ton o VOC per year. There are no anticipated costs or savi s t persons other than small businesses, businesses, local ovemment entities.

COMMENTS B THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPAC THE RULE MAY HAVE BUSINESSES: The fiscal impa this rule has on business d pends on which industry the e is being applied to. Estima d costs range from $238 t $6,560 per ton VOC remove

. This fiscal impact is hi ly dependent on the industrial app ·cation.
THE FUL TEXT OF THIS RULE MAY BE I DURING EGULAR BUSINESS HOURS, AT: NVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY FOURTH FLOOR 195 N 1950W SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-3085 or at the Division ofAdministrative Rules.

UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, October

### OJ, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES


# Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

# R307-352 etal Container, Closure, and Coil Coatings

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE (New Rule) DAR FILE NO.: 36734

FILED: 09/06/2012
RULE ANALYSIS PURPOSE 0 THE RULE OR REASON FOR THE CHANGE: In 006, EPA tightened the 2 -hour PM2.5 national ambien air quality standard fr 65 to 35 micrograms per c ic meter. Currently, sev Utah counties have been found b EPA to not meet this s ndard. Coating operations in the nufacturing or reco itioning of metal cans, drums, pails, a d lids emit volatile rganic compounds (VOCs), which are pre ursors to the fo tion of PM2.5. This rule forthe PM2.5 Stat Implementation Ian will lowerVOCs that are emitted from fro these coatin operations.
GE: This rule applies to coating operations in th manuf cturing or reconditioning of metal cans, drums, pails, nd Ii that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons of volatile orga ic ompounds (VOC) per year and that are located in Box d r, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele, Utah, and Weber co ties. The rule establishes reasonably available control chnology requirements to reduce voe emissions. 

### 0 e and operators have the option to reduce voes by pply1 g coatings with the voe limits established in the e or t use add-on controls to achieve at least a 90% C redu ion. During the public comment period, the Air Quality Bo rd is requesting public input on the appropriat ess of appl ·ng this rule in Tooele and Box Elder counties
STATUTORY OR CO STITUTIONALAU THIS RULE: Subse ion 19-2-104(1)(a)
TOR SAVINGS TO: GET: This rule may add t Air Quality's ad mistrative costs; however, th e costs will be minimal. Ther ore, there are no anticipated c ts or savings to the state b get. 

### + LOCAL G ERNMENTS: This rule does no create any new require ents for local government; therefor there are no anticipa d costs or savings to local government 

### + SMAL BUSINESSES: Anticipated cost to s urces is $3,221 p rton voe removed. 

### + PE ONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSIN SSES, BUSIN SSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL EN TIES: This le applies to coating operations in the manufactur g or reco ditioning of metal cans, drums, pails, and lids that ave the otential to emit 2.7 tons of volatile organic compou ds (V C) per year. There are no anticipated costs or savings to DARFile No. 36734

rsons other than small businesses, businesses, or I ernment entities.
LIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSON

. The compl nee cost to implement the requirements oft s rule is approxi ately $3,221 perton voe removed.
COMMEN S BY THE DEPARTMENT HEA FISCAL IM CT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON SINESSES: The cost to b siness to comply with this rule i approximately $3,221 perton N'OC removed.
THE FULL TEX OF THIS RULE MAY.I BE INSPECTED, DURING REGULJ\ BUSINESS HOUR ,AT: ENVIRON ENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALi FOURTH FL 195 N 1950 W SALT LAKE Cl

INTERESTED P SONS MAY A END A PUBLIC HEARING REGA DING THIS RULE: 

### + 10/15/2012 :00 AM, Bridgerland Ap lied Technology College, 1301 600 W, Rooms 171 Dand , Logan, UT 

### + 10/16/201 11 :00 AM, Mountainland ssociation of Governmen , 586 E 800 N, Orem, UT • 10/17/20 2 02:00 PM, Utah Department of E ironmental Quality, 1 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT 

### + 10/17/ 012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Envi nmental Quality 195N1950W, Room No.1015, SLC, UT

A THORIZED BY: Bryce Bird, Director

R307. Environmental Quality,AirQuality. R307-352. MetalContainer, Closure. and Coil Coatings. R307-352-l. Purpose. The DUfl!OSe of this rule is to reduce volatile organic compound CYOC) emissions from the coating ofmetal coils cans. drums pails. and lids.
R307-352-2. Applicability. R307-352 applies to all coating operations. includin& related cleanin& activities in the manufacturin& orreconditionjng of metal cans. d.rums pails. and lids thathaye the potential to emit 2.7 tons ayear ofVOC and that are located in BoxElder. Cache. Davis. SaltLake. Tooele 

### Utah and Weber counties

UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, October

### OJ, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19DARFile No. 36734

R307-352-3. Definitions. The following additional definitions apply to R307-352: "Coil coating" means any coating applied to metal sheets
or strips which are then rolled into coils for further industrial or commercial use. "End sealing compound" means a compound which is coated onto can ends and which functions as a gasket when the end is assembled onto the can. "Exterior body spray" means a coating sprayed on the exterior ofthe container body to provide a decorative or protective finish. "Interior body spray" means a coating sprayed on the interior ofthe can body to provide a protective film between the product and the can. "Metal container or closure coating" means any coating applied to either the interior or exterior of fooned metal cans. drums. pails. lids or crowns or flat metal sheets which are intended. tobe formed into cans. drums pails. lids orcrowns. "Overvarnish" means a coating applied directly over a design coating to reduce the coefficient offriction. to provide gloss and to protectthe finish against abrasion and corrosion. "Reconditioned drums. pails or lids" means any metal containerwhichis reused. recycled orremanufactured. "Three-piece can side-seam coating" means a coating sprayed on the exterior and/or interior of a welded cemented or soldered seam to protectthe exposed metal. "Two-piece can exterior-end coating" means a coating applied to the exterior bottom end ofa can to reduce the coefficient offriction and to provide protectionto the metal.**R307-3~2-4.** Emission Standards. Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with a VOC content in excess ofthe amounts specified in Table I or shall.
use an add-on control device as specified in R307-352-6.

METAL CONTAINER AND CLOSURE COIL COATING LIMITATIONS (values in pounds voe per gallon of coating, minus water. as applied)
COATING CATEGORY

Sheet basecoat {interior and exterior) and overvarnish Two-piece can exterior basecoat, overvarnish. and end coating
Interior body spray Two-piece cans Three-piece cans Three-piece can side seam spray
End sea1 ing compound: Food cans, non-food cans, and beverage cans
Exterior body spray voe EMISSION RATES

1.9

2.1

3.5

3.0
5.5

0.1
3.5



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, October01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

DRUMS, PAILS AND LIDS Body spray
Reconditioned interior
Reconditioned exterior

New interior

New exterior
End sealing compound: Food drums and non-food drums Inks, all applications
illl Cai 1 coating 4.2

3.5

3.5
2.8

0.5
2.5

1.7
R307-352-5. WorkPractices and Recordkeeping. (}) The owneroroperator shall: Cal Store all VOC-containing coatings. thinners. and cleaningmaterials in closed containers; (b) Minimize spills ofVOC-containingcoatings thinners. and cleaningmaterials: (c) Clean up spills immediately: fdl Convey any coatings. thinners and cleaning materials in closed containers orpipes· Ce) Close mixing vessels that contain VOC coatings and othermaterials exceptwhen specifically in use: and 

### <0 Minimize usage of solvents during cleaning of storage. mixing. and conveyingequipment. (2) The owneroroperator shallmaintainrecords from the manufacturer that demonstrates compliance with the emission standards ofR307-348-4.

R307-352-6. OptionalAdd-On Controls. (I) The owneroroperatormay install and maintain an incinerator. carbon adsorption. or any other add-on emission control device. provided that the emission control device will attain at least 90%efficiencyperformance (2) The owner or operator of a control device shall_ provide certification from the manufacturer that the emission control system will attain required efficiency performance. (3) Emission control systems shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum oftwo years records ofoperating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that the equipment is being qperated and maintained in accqrdance with the manufacturerrecommendations.
R307-352-7. ComplianceSchedule. All sources within Box Elder. Cache. Davis. Salt Lake. Tooele. Utah and Weber counties shall be in compliance with this rule by January I.2014.

KEY: air pollution. emission controls. metal containers. coil**~** Date ofEnactment orLastSubstantiveAmendment: 2012 Authorizing, and Implemented orInterpreted Law: 19-2-1040) .(a)

85DARFile No. 36736



### + MALL BUSINESSES: Anticipated cost to sources is app oximately $2,740 perton

## voe removed. 

### + RSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSE , BUSI ESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITI This ru applies to automotive refinishing coatings opera · ns that emi 2.7 tons of VOC per year. There are no antici ated costs or avings to persons other than small busi businesse or local government entities.
COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERS t to implement the requirements o

,740 perton 

## voe removed.

THE DEPARTMENT H E RULE MAY HAVE 

### 0 to comply with this rul is approximately

moved.

INTERESTED RSONS MAY ATIE A PUBLIC HEARING REG RDING THIS RULE: 

### + 10/15/2012 1:00 AM, Bridgerland Appl d Technology College, 1301 600 W, Rooms 171 D and E, gan, UT 

### + 10/16/20 2 11 :00 AM, Mountainland A ociation of Governme s, 586 E800 N, Orem, UT 

### + 10/17/2 12 02:00 PM, Utah Department of En ·ronmental Quality, 5 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT • 10/1 2012 06:00 PM, Utah Department of Envir Quali , 195 N 1950 W, Room No. 1015, SLC, UT
RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON:
THORIZED BY: Bryce Bird, Director

R307. Environmental Quality,AirQuality. R307-354. Automotive Refinishing Coatings. R307-354-1. Purpose. The purpose of R307-354 is to limit volatile**on~anic** compound emissions fVOCl from automotive refinishing sources.



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, October 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19 NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

R307-354-2. Applicability R307-354 applies to automotive refinishing sources. including related cleaning operations. that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons per year of VOC and are located in Box Elder. Cache._ Davis. Salt Lake.Tooele. Utah and Webercounties.
R307-354-3. Definitions. The following additional definitions apply to R307-354: "Adhesion promoter" means a coating which is labeled and formulated to be applied to uncoated plastic surfaces to facilitate bonding of subsequent coatings. and on which. a subsequent coating is applied. "Automotive" means passenger cars. vans. motorcycles. trucks. buses. golfcarts and all othermobile equipment. "Automotive refinishing" means the process of coating automobiles. after-market automobiles. motorcycles light and medium-duty trucks and vans that are performed in auto body shop. auto repair shops production paint shops. new cardealer repair and paint shops. fleet operation repair and paint shops. and any other facility which coats vehicles under the Standard Industrial Classification Code 7532 £Top. Body and Upholstery Repair Shops and Paint Shops). This includes dealer repair ofvehicles damaged in transit. It does not include refinishing operations for other types of mobile equipment such as fanu machinery and construction equipment or their parts. including partial body collision repairs. that is subsequent to the original coating applied at an automobile original equipment manufacturing plant. "Clear coating" means any coating that contains no pigments and is labeled and formulated for application over a color coatingorclear coating. "Coating" means a protective decorative. or functional material applied in a thin layer to a surface, Such materials may include paints. topcoats. varnishes. sealers stains washcoats. basecoa(S. inks. and temporary protective coatings "Color coating" means any pigmented coating. excluding adhesion promoters. primers. and multi-color coatings that requires
a subsequent clear coating and which is applied over a primer. adhesion promoter or color coating. Colorcoatings include metallic and iridescent color coatings. "Cut-in or jambing clearcoat" means a fast-drying. ready-to-spray clearcoat applied to surfaces such as door jambs and

. trunk and hood edges to allow for quick closure, "Elastomeric coating" means a coating designed for application overflexible parts such as elastomeric bumpers. "Enclosed paint gun cleaner" means a cleaner consisting of a closed container with a door or tqp that can be opened and closed and fitted with cleaning connectiqns The spray gun is attached to a connection. and solvent is pumped through the gun and onto the exterior qfthe gun. Cleaning solvent falls back into the cleaner's sqlventreservoir for recirculation, "Finishing material" means a coating used in .the automotive refinishing industry. including basecoats stains. washcoats. sealers. and topcqa(S, "Finishing operation" means thqse activities in which a finishing material is applied to a substrate and is subsequently airdried cured in an oven. orcured byradiatiqn,



### 89NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

"Low-gloss coating" means a coating which exhibits a gloss reading less thanoreq_μa! to 25 on a 60 degree glossmeter. "Metallic/Iridescent color coating" means a coating which contains iridescent particles. composed ofeither metal 

## as metallic particles or silicon as mica particles. in excess of0 042 pounds per gallon

## as a,pplied where such particles are visible in the dried film. "Multi-colored coating" means a coa,ting which exhibits
more than one color when applied. and which is packa,gcd in a, single conta,iner and applied in a, single coat. ''Non

- enclosed paint gun cleaner" means cleaner consisting ofa, basin similar to a sink in which the operatorwashes the outside ofthe gun under a solvent strea,m. The gun cup is filled with recircula,ted solvent. the gun tip is placed into a canister a,ttached to the basin and suction draws the solvent from the cup through the gun. The solvent grayita,tes to the bottom ofthe basin and drains through a, small hole to a, reservoir tha,t supplies solvent to the recirculation pump. "Pretreatment coating" mea,ns a coating which conta,ins no more that 16%solicls. by weight. and a,t least 0 5%acid by weight is used to provide surface etching and is applied directly to bare meta,1 surfacestoprovide corrosion resistance and promote adhesion for subsequent coatings. "Primer" means anY coa,ting which is la,beled and formulated for a.oplication to a substrate to provide a bondbetween the substrate and subsequent coa.ts: corrosion resistance· a smooth substrate surface: or resistance to penetration of subsequent coats. and on which a subsequent coating is a,pplied. Primers may be pigmented, "Single-sta,ge coa,ting" means any pigmented coating excluding primers and multi-color coatings la,beled and fonuulated for applica,tion without a, subsequent clear coa,t. Single-stage coa,tings include single-sta,ge meta.Ilic/iridescentcoa,tings. "Solids" means the Part ofthe coating tha,t rema,ins a,fter the coa,ting is dried orcured· solids content is determined using da,ta, from EPA Method24 "Specia,Ity coa,tings" means a,dhesion promoters. low-gloss coa,tings bright meta,1 trim repa,ir coa,tings, jambing (cut-in) clearcoa,ts. ela,stomeric coa,tings impact resistant coatings. underbody coa,tings. uniform finish blenders and weld-through "Temporary protective coating" means a,ny coa,ting which is la,beled and formulated for the pur:pose oftempora,rily protecting
areas form oyersprayormechanical damage, "Topcoat" means any coating or series ofcoatings applied
over a primer or an existing finish for the pw:pose ofprotection or beautification. "Truck bed liner coating" means anY coating. excluding clear color multi-color. and single-stage coatings. labeled and formulated for aoolication to a truck bed to protect it from surface abrasion. "Underbody coating" means any coating labeled and formulated for application to wheel wells. the inside ofdoor panels
or fenders. the underside ofa trunk orhood orthe underside ofthe motorvehicle "Uniform finish coating" means anY coating la,beled and formulated for application to the area around a, spot repair for the pur:pose ofblending a repaired area's colororclearcoatto match the appearance of an adjacent area,'s existing coating. Prior to May I.

90 DARFileNo. 36736

2013 this coa,ting category may be referred to 

## as uniform finish blenders. "Uniform finish blender" means a coating designed to blend a repaired topcoat into an existing topcoat
8307-354-4. Emission Standards. Each owner or operator sha,ll not apply coatings with a VOC content in excess ofthe 

## amounts 5P1!Cified jnTable 1or shall
use an add-on control device as specified in R307-354-6

AUTOMOTIVE REFINISHING 

### voe LIMITS (values in pounds of 

### voe per gallon of coating. minus water. as applied)

COATING CATEGORY 

### voe EMISSION RATES
Adhesion Promoter 4.5
Clear Coating 2. 1
Color Coating 3.5
Multi-color Coating 5.7

Pretreatment Coating 5.5
Primer 2.1
Primer Sealer 2.1 Single-stage Coating 2.8 Temoorary Protective Coating 0.5

Truck Bed Liner Coating 2.6 Underbody Coating 3.6
Uniform Finish Coating Any Other Coating Type 2.1 8307-354-5, WorkPracticeand Recordkeepjng, (I) Control techniques and work practices are to be implemented at all times to reduce 

## voe emissions from fugitive type sources. Control techniques and workpractices include: fa) Tightfitting covers for opentanks: <b) Covered conta,iners for solyentwiping cloths: (cl Collection hoods for areas where solvent is used for fd) Minimizing spill of VOC-containing cleaning ma,terials:<e) Conveying VOC-containing materials from one locationto another in closed containersorpipes: 

### <O Cleaning spray guns in enclosed systems or a non-enclosed paint gun clea,ner may be used ifthe vapor pressure of the cleaning solvent is less than 100 mm Hg at 68 degrees Fahrenheit and the solvent is directed towards a drain that leads directly to an enclosedremote reservoir: and (g) Using recycled solvents for cleaning, (2) The owneroroperatorshall maintain records from the manufacturer that demonstrate compliance with the emission standardsofR307-354-4,

UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, October01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 19DARFile No. 36736

(3) Applicationequipmentrequirements: (a) Aperson shall not wply any coating to an automotive part or componentunless the coating application method achieves a demonstrated 65%transferefficiency, (b) The following coating application methods have been demonstratedto achieve a minimumof65%transferefficiency: (i) Brush dip orroll coating operated in accordance with the manufacturers specifications: (ii) Electrostatic wplication equipment operated in accordance with the manufacturers specifications: and (iii) High Volume. Low Pressure spray equipment operated in accordance with the manufacturers specifications. (c) Other coating wplication methods may be used that have been demonstrated to be capable of achieving at least 65% transfer efficiency. as certifiedbythe manufacturer.


### R307-354-6. OptionalAdd-On Controls. (I) Theowneroroperatormay install and maintain an incinerator. carbon adsorption or any other add-on emission control device. provided thatthe emission control device will attain at least 90%efficiencyperformance. (2) The owner or operator of a control device shall_ provide certification from the manufacturer that the emission control systemwill attain requiredefficiencyperformance. (3) Emission control systems shall be operated and

· maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations.

The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum oftwo years records ofoperating and maintenance sufficient to demonstrate that the equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturerrecommendations.


### R307-354-7. Compliance Schedule. All sources within Box Elder. Cache. Davis. Salt Lake. Tooele. 

### Utah. and Weber counties shall be in compliance with this rule by January I.2014.


### KEY: ajrpollution. automotive refinishing.VOC. coatings Date ofEnactmentorLast SubstantiveAmendment: 2012 Authorizing. and Implemented orInterpretedLaw: 19-2-104(1) 

# w
vironmental Quality, Air Quali 

# R307-355

RULE ANALYSIS THE RULE OR REASON OR THE 2006, EPA tightened the 24-ho ambient air quality standard from 65



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, October01, 2012,Vol. 2012, No. 19 NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES
micrograms per cubic meter. Currently, seven Utah counti s have been found by EPAto not meet this standard. Coati gs

perations, organic solvent cleansing, and storage nd

· posal of solvents at aerospace manufacture and r ork fa ilities emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs), whi h are pre ursors to the formation of PM2.5. This rule for the M2.5 Stat Implementation Plan will lower VOCs that are emitted from ese operations.
This r, le applies to aeros ace manufacture and rework facilities t at have the potential o emit five tons of volatile organi compounds (VOC) pe year and that are located in Box Ider, Cache, Davis, Salt ake, Tooele, Utah, and Weber co ties. The rule establishes reasonably available cont I technology requirements to reduce VOC emissions Owners and operators ha the option to reduce V Cs by applying coatings with t 

## voe limits established i the rule or to use add-on controls 0 achieve at least a 9 

### % 

## voe reduction. Coating applicati methods and work ractices for cleaning materials are es blished. Owner and operators are required to maint · records from e manufacturer that demonstrate compli ce with the e 1ssion standards in the rule. Hand-wipe, flus , and spray g n cleaning requirements are included in the rul

. During t public comment period, the Air Quality Board is reque ting public input on the appropriateness of apply g this le in Tooele and Box Elder counties and is asking in stry t provide information on their cost to comply with the rule

ANTICIPATED COST OR AVI STO: • THE STATE BUDGET: Ther may some an increase in administrative costs at e Divisi of Air Quality; however, costs should be minim

. Therefor ,there are no anticipated costs or savings to the tate budget. 

## + LOCAL GOVERN ENTS: This le does not add any requirements to lo I government; t refore, there are no anticipated costs or avings. 

### +SMALL BUSINE SES: The division to small busines es to implement this le. However, the division is unsur of what those costs wo d be. That is why during the pub c comment period, the Ai Quality Board is asking that ind stry provide cost information. 

### + PERSON OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESS , OR LOCAL GOVERNMEN This rule pplies to aerospace manufacture and rework facilities t t have the potential to emit five to of volatile organic c mpounds (VOC) peryear. There are n anticipated costs**o~** savings to persons other than small b sinesses, busine es, or local government entities.

divi · n does anticipate compliance costs for a ected per ons. However, the division is unsure ofwhat those osts w Id be. That is why during the public comment period, the

# UTAH STATE BULLETIN

OFFICIALNOTICES OF UTAH STATE GOVERNMENT Filed December0I, 2012, 12:00 a.m. through December 14, 2012, 11 :59 p.m.

Number2013-1 January 01, 2013

Nancy 

### L. Lancaster, Editor KennethA. Hansen, Director Kimberly K. Hood, Executive Director

The 

## Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin) is an official noticing publication ofthe executive branch of Utah State Government. The Department ofAdministrative Services, Division ofAdministrative Rules produces the 

## Bulletin under authority ofSection 63G-3-402.
Inquiries concerning the substance or applicability ofan administrative rule that appears in the 

## Bulletin should be addressed to the contact person for the rule. Questions about the 

## Bulletin or the rulemaking process may be addressed to: Division ofAdministrative Rules, PO Box 141007, SaltLake City, Utah 84114-1007, telephone 801-538-3764, FAX 801-537-9240. Additional rulemaking information, and electronic versions of all administrative rule publications are available at: http://www.rules.utah.gov/

The information in this 

## Bulletin is summarized in the 

## Utah State Digest (Digest). The

## Digest is available by E-mail or over the Internet. Visit http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/digest.htm for additional information.Division ofAdministrative Rules, Salt Lake City 84114

Unless otherwise noted, all information presented in this publication is in the public domain and maybe reproduced, reprinted, and r<.!distributed as desired. Materials incorporated by reference retain the copyrightasserted by theirrespective authors. Citation to the source is requested.

Utah state bulletin. Semimonthly. I. Delegated legislation--Utah--Periodicals. 2. Administrative procedure-Utah-Periodicals. I. Utah. Office ofAdministrative Rules.

KFU440.A73S7 348.792'025--DDC 85-643197

## TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

.................................................................................................................................................1 Human Services Services for People with Disabilities No. 37110 (Amendment): R539-1 Eligibility

..........................................................................................................- ...2 No. 37111 (Amendment): R539-2 Service Coordination

............................................................................................8 Natural Resources Wildlife Resources No. 37097 (Amendment): R657-37 Cooperative Wildlife Management Units

for Big Game orTurkey

..........................................................................................................................................11 Regents (Board Of) University of Utah, Commuter Services No. 37096 (Amendment): R810-1-8 University Vehicle Parking

..............................................................................12 No. 37098 (Amendment): R810-1-14 Living In A MotorVehicle On Campus

..........................................................13 No. 37092 (Amendment): R810-2-1 Parking Meters

................................................................................................14 Tax Commission Administration No. 37104 (Amendment): R861-1A-26 Procedures for FormalAdjudicative

Proceedings Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Sections 59-1-501 and 63G-4-204 through 63G-4-209

.................................................................................................................................................15 No. 37106 (Amendment): R861-1A-37 Provisions Relating to Disclosure of

Commercial Information Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Section 59-1-404

...............................................................17 No. 37107 (Amendment): R861-1A-46 Procedures for Purchaser Refund

Requests Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Sections 59-1-1410 and 59-12-110

..........................................................18 Auditing No. 37108 (Amendment): R865-91-13 Pass-Through Entity Withholding Pursuant to Utah CodeAnn. Sections 59-10-116, 59-10-117, 59-10-118, 59-10-1403.2, and 59-1 0-1405

......................................................................................................................................................20 Property Tax No. 37109 (Amendment): R884-24P-67 Information Required for Valuation of

Low-Income Housing Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. Sections 59-2-102 and 59-2-301.3

..............................................................................................................................................................22 Transportation Administration No. 37094 (Repeal and Reenact): R907-64 Longitudinal and WirelessAccess to

Interstate Highway Rights-of-Way for Installation ofTelecommunications Facilities

..............................................23
NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES

........................................................................................................................31 Environmental Quality Administration No. 36554: R305-6 Administrative Procedures

........................................................................................................32 No. 36553: R305-7Administrative Procedures ........................................................................................................32 Air Quality No. 36723: R307-101-2 Definitions

..........................................................................................................................38 No. 36741: R307-307 Davis, Salt Lake, and Utah Counties: Road Salting and Sanding

.......................................45 No. 36740: R307-312Aggregate Processing Operations for PM2.5 NonattainmentAreas

.....................................47 No. 36725: R307-340 Ozone Nonattainment and MaintenanceAreas: Surface Coating

Processes

...............................................................................................................................................................48 No. 36738: R307-343 Ozone Nonattainment and MaintenanceAreas: Emissions Standards

for Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations

.......................................................................................................49 No. 36726: R307-344 Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings

..............................................................................................52 No. 36727: R307-345 Fabric and Vinyl Coatings

.....................................................................................................54 No. 36728: R307-346 Metal Furniture Surface Coatings

.........................................................................................57 No. 36729: R307-347 Large Appliance Surface Coatings

.......................................................................................59 No. 36730: R307-348 MagnetWire Coatings

..........................................................................................................61 No. 36731: R307-349 FlatWood Panel Coatings

....................................................................................................63 No. 36732: R307-350 Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Coatings

..............................................................65



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. I

### TABLE OF CONTENTS

No. 36733: R307-351 GraphicArts

..........................................................................................................................69 No. 36734: R307-352 Metal Container, Closure, and Coil Coatings

........................................................................73 No. 36735: R307-353 Plastic Parts Coatings

...........................................................................................................75 No. 36736: R307-354Automotive Refinishing Coatings

..........................................................................................79 No. 36737: R307-355 Control of Emissions from Aerospace Manufacture and

Rework Facilities

....................................................................................................................................................82

FIVE-YEAR NOTICES OF REVIEWAND STATEMENTS OF CONTINUATION

...........................................................................87 Administrative Services Administration No. 37089: R13-3Americans with DisabilitiesAct Grievance Procedures

...............................................................87 Environmental Quality Radiation Control No. 37086: R313-15 Standards for Protection Against Radiation

............................................................................87 Financial Institutions Credit Unions No. 37105: R337-4 Establishment of"Credit Union Service Organizations"

...........................................................88 Health Disease Control and Prevention, Epidemiology No. 37093: R386-705 Epidemiology; Health Care Associated Infection

..................................................................89 Centerfor Health Data, Vital Records and Statistics No. 37087: R436-6 Delayed Registration of Birth or Death

.....................................................................................89 Insurance Administration No. 37099: R590-124 Loss Information Rule

...........................................................................................................90 No. 37100: R590-155 Utah Life and Health Insurance GuarantyAssociation

Summary Document.

..............................................................................................................................................90 No. 37101: R590-215 PermissibleArbitration Provisions for Individual and Group

Health Insurance

....................................................................................................................................................91 Natural Resources Wildlife Resources No. 37090: R657-23 Utah Hunter Education Program

.............................................................................................92 No. 37091: R657-33 Taking Bear

.............................................................................................................................92 Public Service Commission Administration No. 37095: R746-343 Rule for Deaf, Severely Hearing or Speech Impaired Person

..............................................93 No. 37102: R746-356 Intrastate (lntraLATA) EqualAccess to Toll Calling Services

by Telecommunications Carriers

............................................................................................................................93 School and InstitutionalTrust Lands Administration No. 37088: R850-70 Sales of Forest Products From Trust Lands Administration Lands

.........................................94
NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES

.....................................................................................................................................95

2012 RULES INDEX BYAGENCY(CODE NUMBER) AND BY KEYWORD (SUBJECT)

...........................................................................................................................................................97

ii 

### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013. No. lDAR File No. 36740


# Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

# R307-312 regate Processing Operations f 

# PM2.5 NonattainmentAreas

NO ICE OF CHANGE IN PROPOSED RU DAR FILE NO.: 36740

FILED: 12/10/2012


### RULE ANALYSIS PURPOSE THE RULE OR REASON CHANGE: Du ·ng the public comment peri , comments from both indust and the EPA were submitte that resulted in the need to ma e substantive changes to t rule.
SUMMARY OF T RULE OR CHANGE Section R307- 312-2 is changed b incorporating the P .5 nonattainment and maintenance are as defined in 40 FR 81.345 and by adding a geographical escription ofthe rea. Adefinition for "Aggregate" is added t Section R307- 121-3. Language is added to the opacity ob ervation req rement of Subsection R307-312-4(2) that states he Method observations shall be 30 minutes (five six-minut average

. The compliance shall be based on the average o the fiv six-minute averages, but the duration of the Method ma be reduced to 6 minutes (one six-minute average) if e 1rst six-minute average is below the limit specified in 

### 1 1 of Section R307-312-4. Section R307-312-5 is chang d by adding language that states compliance with the req i ments of Subsection R307- 312-5(2) shall be determined y reduction records and fuel records. (DAR NOTE: Th' cha ge in proposed rule has been filed to make addition chang sto a proposed new rule that was published in the ctober 1, 012, issue of the Utah State Bulletin, on page 5. Underl1 ing in the rule below indicates text that has b n added sin the publication ofthe proposed rule mention above; strike- ut indicates text that has been deleted. Yi must view the hange in proposed rule and the propose new rule together understand all of the changes that wil e enforceable shoul the agency make this rule effective.)
STATUTORY OR ONSTITUTIONALAUTHO IZATION FOR THIS RULE: ction 19-2-101 and Section 19-2-104 and Section 19-2-1
MATERIALS CORPORATED BY REFERENCE •A ds 40 CFR 81.345, published by Unit G ernment Printing Office, 07/01/2011
ANTICIP ED COST OR SAVINGS TO: • THE ATE BUDGET: The changes to Subsection 312-4( may result in a cost or a savings to the Divis Air Qu lity; however, it is difficult to estimate what those sts or sa ings would be. Any additional cost or saving woul be mini al; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or savin s to t e state budget.



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, January 01, 2013,Vol. 2013, No. I NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES

LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: There are no new requirem ts local government; therefore, there are no anticipated sts

vings. • S LL BUSINESSES: There are no new require small usinesses; therefore, there are no anticipated saving 

### + PER ONS OTHER THAN BUSINES ES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTA There are new requirements to persons ot r than small businesses, businesses, or local gover ent entities; therefore, ther are no anticipated costs ors ings.

COMMENTS BY THE EPA TMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RUL Y HAVE ON BUSINESSES: The only new requirement fo usinesses is the requirement for hot mix asphalt plants emonstrate compliance with Section R307-312-5 thro h eduction records and fuel records. This requiremen should ot h·ave a fiscal impact on businesses.
THE FULL TEXT 

### 0 THIS RULE AY BE INSPECTED, DURING REGULAR USINESS HOUR ,AT: ENVIRON ENTAL QUALITY AIR 

## au ITY. FOURT FLOOR 195 N 950 W SAL LAKE CITY, UT 84116-3085 the Division ofAdministrative Rule

. DIRECT ESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE • Mark erger by phone at 801-536-4000, by F at 801- 536-00 5, or by Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov

THORIZED BY: Bryce Bird, Director

R307. Environmental Quality,AirQuality. R307-312. Aggregate Processing Operations for PM2.5 NonattainmentAreas. R307-312-l. Purpose. R307-312 establishes emission standards for sources in the aggregate processing industry, including aggregate processing equipment, hot mix asphaltplants, and concretebatch plants.
R307-312-2. Applicability. (I) R307-312 applies to all crushers, screens, conveyors, hot mix asphalt plants, and concrete batch plants located within a PM2.5 nonattainment and maintenance area as defined in 40 CFR 81.345 <July I. 20Illand geographically described as all regions ofSaltLake and Davis counties· all portions ofthe Cache Valley: all regions in

47

### NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES

Weber and Utah counties westofthe Wasatch mountain range· in Box Elder County. from the Wasatch mountain range west to the Promontory mountain range and south of Portage· and in Tooele_ Count)' from the northernmost part ofthe Oquirrh mountain range to. the northern most part ofthe Stansbury mountain range and north o( Route 199.[Be:>< Elder, Caehe, Dt1Yis, Salt Lftlce, 'Feeele, Utah, er \l,Zebereetlflties.] (2) The provisions ofR307-3I2do not apply to temporary hotmix asphaltplants. ·
R307-312-3. Definitions. 

### The following definitions apply to R307-3 I

### 2: "Aggregate" means material of wbich the majorit)' is nonmetallic minerals "Concrete batch plant" means any facility used to manufacture concrete by mixing aggregatewith cement. "Conveyor" means a device for transporting nonmetallic materials from onepiece ofequipmentto another. "Cmsher" means a machine used to cmsh any nonmetallic minerals. "Hot mix asphalt plant" means any facility used to manufacture hot mix asphalt by heating and drying aggregate and mixing with asphaltcements. "Nonmetallic mineral" has the same definition as defined in 40 CFR 60.671. "Screen" means adevice for separatingnonmetallic minerals according to size by passing undersize material through one or more mesh surfaces in series, and retaining oversize material on the mesh surfaces. "Temporary" means not more than 180 operating days and notmore than 365 calendardays.

R307-3I2-4. Visible Emissions. (I) 

### Visible emissions from sources subject to R307-312 shall notexceedthe opacity limits as specified inTable I.

CATEGORY
Crushers Screens Conveyor transfer points Concrete batch plants TABLE 1



### (2) Opacity Observation. OPACITY LIMIT

12% 7% 7% 7%



### (a) Opacity observations ofemissions shall be conducted according to40 CFR 60,AppendixA, Method 9. fb\ The duration ofthe Method 9 observations shall be 30 minutes (five six-minute averages) (c) Compliance shall be based on !he average of !he five six-mjnute averages The duration ofMetbod 9 may be reduced to 

### 6 minutes lone six-minute average) jf !he first six-minute average is below !he limitspecified inTable I

R307-312-5. HotMixAsphaltPlants. (I) 

### The filterable PM2.5 emission rate from a hot mix asphaltplantdryershall notexceed 0.024 grains perdscf. (a) Filterable PM2.5 emissions shall be determined by 40 CFR 51,Appendix M. Method 201A.

48 DARFile No. 36740

1 

### asis.

_____ compliance shall be based on eitherthe daily amount of hotmix asphaltproduced averaged overthe operating day orthe daily amount ofhot mix asphalt produced while burning a fuel other than natural gas orLPG averaged overthe time the plant is operating while burning afuel otherthan natural gas orLPGeach day. (cl 

### Compliance shall be 

### detenuined by production records and fuel records

R307-312-6. ComplianceSchedule. (I) 

### All sources subject to R307-312-4 or R307-312-5(2) shall be 

### in compliance with this rule by June 7, 2013. (2) All sources subject to R307-312-5(1) that begin construction prior to June 7, 2013, shall submit test results demonstrating compliance with R307-312-5(I) 

### to the director by December 14, 2015. (3) All sources subject to R307-312-5(1) that begin construction on or after June 7, 2013, shall submit test results demonstrating compliance with R307-3 l

### 2-5(I)

### to the director no later than 180days afterinitial startup.

KEY: airpollution, aggregate, asphalt, concrete Date ofEnactmentorLastSubstantiveAmendment:**[~)llll.J.** Authorizing, and Implemented orInterpreted Law: 19-2-101; 19- 2-104; 19-2-109



## Environmental Quality, Air**Qualit~** 

# R307-340
zone Nonattainment an Mainte anceAreas: Surfac Processes

ALYSIS PURPOSE OF OR REASON FOR THE CHANGE: On t Utah Air Quality Board approved the repeal f this rul but requested that the effective date of the peal be 02/01 013. That date comes three days after t proposed rule lap date of 01/29/2013. Therefore, in or r to not let the rule la e, and to have an effective repe date of 02/0112013, a CH nge In Proposed Rule is bein 1led.
SUMM Y OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: chan s being made to the body of the rule. Utah Air Qu ty Board has requested that the repeal of th rule be

UTAHSTATEBULLETIN,

### January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. IDARFile No. 36726

and to require them to make those records available to the director upon request. Subsection R307-344-5(3) i amended by adding application requirements. Section R30

- 344-6 is changed to clarify that the owner or operator m st provi documentation that the emission control system ·11 attain t e requirements of Section R307-344-6. (DAR N TE: This cH nge in proposed rule has been filed to ake additiona changes to a proposed new rule that was pu ished in the 0 ber 1, 2012, issue of the Utah State Bull tin, on page 65. derlining in the rule below indicates text hat has been adde since the publication of the prop sed rule mentioned a ove; strike-out indicates text that as been deleted. You ust view the change in proposed le and the proposed new le together to understand all of he changes that will be en rceable should the agency ke this rule effective.)
STATUTORY OR NSTITUTIONALAUTH THIS RULE: Subse ion 19-2-104(1)(a)

e the rule's applicability to existing sources in Box Elder a Tooele counties is changed from sources with the potential emit 2.7 tons per year

## voe to sources with the the potenti It emit 5tons per year VOC, the rule will apply to few r so rces in those counties, resulting in a savings of p to 1,440 per ton of 

## voe removed. 

### + PERSONS OTHER THAN ALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LO AL GOVER MENTAL ENTITIES: Because there are no ew requireme s for persons other than small businesse , businesses, o local government entities, there are no ticipated costs or vings.
COMPLIANCE C STS FOR AFFEC PERSONS: Because the rule' applicability to existing ources in Box Elder and Tooele aunties is changed from s urces with the potential to emit .7 tons per year 

## voe to so rces with the the potential to mit 5 tons per year

## voe, the le will apply to fewer sourc s in those counties, resulting in savings of up to $1,440 rton of

## voe removed.
COMMENT BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD FISCAL I ACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSI Because he rule's applicability to existing sources ·n Box Elder an Tooele counties is changed from sources w h the potenti to emit 2.7 tons per year 

## voe to sources wit the the po ntial to emit 5 tons per year 

## voe, the rule will a ply to fe er sources in those counties, resulting in a saving of up t $1,440 perton of

## voe removed.



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, January 01, 2013,Vol. 2013, No. I NOTICES OFCHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES

R307. Environmental Quality,AirQuality. R307-344. Paper,Film, andFoil Coatings. R307-344-l. Purpose. The purpose of this rule is to limit volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from roll, knife, and rotogravure coaters and dryingovens ofpaper, film, and foil coatingoperations.
R307-344-2. Applicability. [R3G7 344 !IJll"lies ff! f'!IJleF, Hlftl; mu! fail eet!Eiftg eflerfttieHs, iHelttdiHg relHted eleMing Rethities, thftt Hll•e !he f'!lteHtilll ff! emit 2.7 teHS !"Cf )ellf ef

## voe llHd !hilt llfe leellted it! Bell Elder, Clleke, Dll'tis, Solt Llllre, Tueele, U!ftk MdV/eher eettHties.](J) R307- 344 aP!llies to sources located in Cache Davis, Salt Lake Utah and. Weber counties that have the potential to emit 2 7 tons per year or. more ofVOC.includingrelated cleaning activities (2) In Box Elder and Tooele counties, R307-344 applies to the following sources: (a) Existing sources as of February 

### !. 2013. with the potential to emit 5 tons per year or more of

## voe including related. cleaning activities: and Cb) New sources 

## as of February I 2013. that haye the potential to emit 2 7 tons per year or more ofYOC. including related cleaning activities.

R307-344-3. Definitions. The following additional definitions applyto R307-344: "Coating" means a protective, functional, or decorative film applied in a thin layer to a surface. This term often applies to paints such as lacquers orenamels. It is also used to refer to films applied to paper, plastics, orfoil. "Foil coating" means a coating applied in a web coating process on any foil substrate other than paper or fabric, including, but not limited to, typewriter ribbons, photographic film, magnetic tape, and metal foil gift wrap, but excluding coatings applied to packaging used exclusively for food and health care products for human and animal consumption. "Knife coating" means the application ofa coating material to a substrate bymeans ofdrawingthe substrate beneath a blade that spreadsthe coatingevenlyoverthe width ofthe substrate.

53NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES

"Paper coating" means unifonn distribution ofcoatings put on paper, film, foils and pressure sensitive tapes regardless of substrate. Related web coating processes on plastic film and decorative coatings on metal foil are included in this definition. Paper coatingcovers saturation operations as well as coatingoperations. "Roll coating" means the application ofacoatingmaterial to asubstrate bymeans ofhardrubberorsteelrolls. "Roll printing" means the application ofwords, designs and pictures to a substrate usually by means ofa series ofhard rubber or steel rolls eachwith onlypartial coverage. "Rotogravure coating" means the application ofa unifonn layer ofmaterial across the entire width ofthe web to substrate by
means ofaroll coating technique in which the pattern to be applied is etched on the coating roll. The coating material is picked up in these recessed areas and istransferredto the substrate. "Saturation" means dippingthe web into abath. ''Web" means acontinuous sheetofsubstrate.

R307-344-4. Emission Standards. Each owneroroperatorshall not apply coatings with aVOC content in excess ofthe amounts specified in Table l or shall use an add-on control device as specifiedin R307-344-6.

TABLE 1 Paper, Film, and Foil Coating Limitations (values in pounds voe per pound of coating, minus water.J!!!! exempt solvents (compounds not classified as VOC), as applied)

COATING CATEGORY voe EM!SSION RATES Paper, film and foil 0.08
Pressure sensitive tape and label 0.067
R307-344-5. WorkPracticesandRecordkeeping. (l) Control techniques and work practices are to be implemented at all times to reduce

# voe emissions from fugitive type sources. Control techniques andworkpractices include: (a) Usingtightfitting covers foropen tanks; (b) Using covered containers for solventwipingcloths; (c) Using collection hoods for areas where solvent is used for cleanup; (d) Minimizing spills of VOC-containing cleaning materials;(e) ConveyingVOC-containing materials from one location to anotherin closed containers orpipes; (f) Cleaningspray guns inenclosed systems; and (g) Usingrecycled solvents for cleaning. (2) [The 6'Ml:ef6f6f'el'!tt6fshttll lfl11mt11ill: reeeras fffllfl the lflllll:ttf11eltifertl111tEleH!eHslfllte eeH!plillflee with the emissiell: stanElllfEls efR3G7 344 4.)All sources subjectto R307-344 shall maintain records demonstrating compliance with all provisions of R307-344 on an. annual basis. (a) Records shall include. butnot limited to. inventory and productdatasheets ofall coatings and solvents subjectto R307-344. fb) These records shall be available to the director uoon

(3) No person shall apply coatings unlessthese materials are applied with equipment operated according to the manufacturer's specifications. and bytheuse ofone ofthe following methods:

54 DARFile No. 36726

(a) Flowcoater: fb) Roll coater; (c) Dip coater; (d) Foamcoater: (e) Die coater: 

### <O Hand applicationmethods: (g) High-volume. lowpressure (HVLPl spray: or (h) Other application method capable ofachieving at least 65%transferefficiency. as certified bythe manufacturer. ( 4) All persons shall perfoun solvent cleaning operations with cleaningmaterials having

# voe contentof0.21 pounds per gallon**~** R307-344-6. OptionalAdd-On Controls. (1) The owner or operator may install and maintain an incinerator, carbon adsorption, or any other add-on emission control device, provided that the emission control device will attain at least 90%efficiencyperfonnance. (2) The owner or operator ofa control device shall provide [eertiiie11tiell:)documentation [fre!fl the lflllHttfoetttrer)thatthe emission control system will attain [ feEjttireEI**effieiell:e~·** perffiflflllflee ]the requirements ofR307-344-6. (3) Emission control systems shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum oftwo years records ofoperating and maintenance sufficientto demonstrate thatthe equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturerrecommendations.

R307-344-7. ComplianceSchedule. (1) All sources in Davis and Salt Lake counties are subject to this rule upon the effective date. (2) Sources in Box Elder. Cache. Tooele, Utah and Weber counties shall be in compliance with the rule byJanuary 1, 2014.

KEY: VOC emission,papercoating, film coating, foil coating DateofEnactmentorLastSubstantiveAmendment: [WH]1!UJ Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(1) (a)


## nvironmental Quality, Air Quali 

# R307-345

PURPOSE OF TH FOR THE CHANGE: During and existing sm sources expressed th · concerns about the 2.7 tons r year applicability being ap ox Elder and Tooele counties. regarding the



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. 1DARFile No. 36727

re uirements. The changes to the proposed rule are res onse to these comments.
ARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: Section R3

- 345-2 is changed stating that in Tooele and Box E er countie , as of 02/0112013, the rule applies to exi ing sources as of 02/01/2013, that have the potential to e it 5 tons per ear or more of VOC and applies to new s urces that have e potential to emit 2.7 tons peryear or mar 

## voe. The rule s I applies in Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, U h, and Weber coun ·es to sources that have the potential t emit 2.7 tons per yea or more VOC. Language is added o Section R307-345-4 to clarify that exempt solvents are no included in the VOC cont nt limits for the coating used. It is also changed by ad 'ng lower 

## voe emission rates that become effective 01/01/2 15. Section R307-345-5 · changed to require owners and operators to m ntain records demonstrating co liance with the rule on n annual basis and to require them to make those record available to the director upon req st. Subsection 307-345-5(4) is amended by adding a lication requirem ts. Section R307- 345-6 is changed to c rify that the o er or operator must provide documentation at the emissi n control system will attain the requirements o Section R3 -345-6. (DAR NOTE: This change in propose rule ha been filed to make additional changes to a pro osed ne rule thatwas published in the October 1, 2012, iss of t e Utah State Bulletin, on page 67. Underlining in the le b low indicates text that has been added since the publ a on of the proposed rule mentioned above; strike-out i icates text that has been deleted. You must viewthe ch ge in proposed rule and the proposed new rule together t u erstand all of the changes that will be enforceable sh Id t e agency make this rule effective.)
UTHORIZATION FOR



### T: The changes o this rule do not result in any new re uirements to the sta ; therefore, there are no anticipated c sts or savings to the st te budget. 

### +LOCAL GOVER MENTS: The changes t this rule do not result in any w requirements to loca governments; therefore, there re no anticipated costs or s vings to local governments. • SMALL BU NESSES: Because the rule's a licability to existing sour s in Box Elder and Tooele counties is changed from source with the potential to emit 2.7 tons pe ear

## voe to sources ith the the potential to emit 5 tons per ar

## voe, the rule ·11 apply to fewer sources in those aunties, resulting n a savings of up to $3,500 per ton 

## voe remove

. 

### + PE SONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINE BUSI SSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTI Beca se there are no new requirements for persons o er tha small businesses, businesses, or local governm t en · ies, there are no anticipated costs or savings.



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. I NOTICES OFCHANGESINPROPOSED RULES

COSTS FOR AFFECTED Be use the rule's applicability to existing sources i Box Eide nd Tooele counties is changed from sources h the potenti to emit 2.7 tons per year 

## voe to sources ith the the pate ial to emit 5 tons per year

## voe, the rul ill apply to fewer s rces in those counties, resulting in savings of up to $3,50 erton of

## voe removed.

DIRECT

## au STIONS REGARDING THIS RUL TO: • Mark Be er by phone at 801-536-4000, by at 801- 536-008 , or by Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.g

HORIZED BY: Bryce Bird, Director

R307. Environmental Quality,AirQuality. R307-345. FabricandVinyl Coatings. R307-345-1. Purpose. The purpose of this rule is to limit volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from fabric and vinyl coating operations. which use roll 

### knife. orrotograyure coaters anddryingovens.
R307-345-2. Applicability. [R397 345 applies ta ftthrie l!Hd 

### 'Ut)I ealltiHg aperlltiaHs, iHeh1diJtg rellltetl ele11HiJtg aeti·;ities, wkiek 1:1se rell, letifu, ar rett>gl'lh1:1re eBllters Md

### dr,iHg a'eHstftlltha 1ethep6teHtiBl t6 emit2.7 t6Hs perye111 afVOC llftd that 111e laelltetl iJt Bax Elder, Caeke, Da.is, Salt Laite, Tuaele. Ut!lh llftd**',\~her** eBttHties.]O) R307-345 applies to
sources located in Cache. Davis Salt

### Lake. Utah and Weber counties. that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons per year or more of

# voe._ includingrelated cleaning activities. (2) In BoxElder andTooele counties R307-345 aoolies to the following sources: (a) Existing sources as of Febn!azy I 2013 with the potential to emit 5 tons per year or more of

## voe. including related cleaning activities· and Cb) New sources 

### as of February I. 2013 that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons per year or more of

# voe. including related cleaning activities.

55NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES

R307-345-3. Definitions. The following additional definitions applyto R307-345: "Coating" means aprotective, functional, or decorative film applied in a thin layer to a surfacej ifleltttli-Hg hieqtters, eflftfflels, la!eJtes, aerylies, pei)iifl)1 ehleFiae, pel)'Ul'eth!IAes, H!l!ltffii ll!la S)'fl!hetiertteeers. It alse**~plies** te filrHs applied te**p~er,** plasties, er fflit:

### l "Fabric coating" means the coating or saturation ofatextile substrate with a knife, roll or rotogravure coater to impart characteristics that are not initially present, such as strength, stability, water or acid repellency, or appearance. Fabric coatings can include, but are not limited to, industrial and electrical tapes, tie cord, utility meter seals, imitation leathers, tarpaulins, shoe material, and upholstery fabrics. "Knife coating" means the application ofa coating material to a substrate by means ofdrawing the substrate beneath a blade that spreads the coatingevenly overthe width ofthe substrate. "Roller coating" the coating material is applied to the moving fabric, in a direction opposite to the movement of the substrate, byhardrubberorsteelrolls. "Rotogravure coating" means the application ofa uniform layer ofmaterial across the entire width ofthe web to substrate by
means ofaroll coating technique in which the pattern to be applied is etched on the coating roll. The coating material is picked up in these recessedareas and is transferredto the substrate. ''Vinyl coating" means applying a decorative or protective top coat, orprintingonvinyl coated fabric orvinyl sheets.

R307-345-4. Emission Standards. (1) Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with a VOC contentin excess ofthe amounts specified inTable 1orshall use an add-on control device as specifiedin R307-345-6.

TABLE 1 Fabric and Vinyl Coating Limitations (values in pounds 

### voe per gallon of coating, minus water...Mll! exempt solvents (compounds not classified as VOC), as applied)
COATING CATEGTORY 

### voe EMlSSlON RATES Effective Through December 31, 2014 Fabric 2.9 Vinyl 3.B 

### voe EMISSION RATES Effective Beginning January 1, 2015

(2) Organosol and plastisol coatings shall not be used to bubble emissions from vinyl printingandtop coating.

R307-345-5. WorkPracticesandRecordkeeping. (1) Control techniques and work practices are to be implemented at all times to reduce

## voe emissions from fugitive type sources. Control techniques andworkpractices include: (a) Tightfitting covers foropentanks ordrums; (b) Covered containers for solventwiping cloths; (c) Collection hoods for areas where solvent is used for cleanup; (d) Coveredmixing

### tanks; and (e) Covered hoods and oven routed to add-on control devices, which may include, but are not limited to, after burners, thermal incinerators, catalyticoxidation, orcarbon adsorption.

56 DARFileNo. 36727

(2) No person shall apply any coating unless the coating application method achieves ademonstrated 65%transferefficiency. The following applications achieve a minimum of 65% transfer efficiency and must be operated in accordance with the manufacturers specifications: (a) 

### Foamcoat: (bl Flowcoat: (c) Roll coat: Cdl Dip coat: (e) Die coat: (e) High-volume. low-pressure fHVLP) spray: (f) Hand applicationmethods: or (g) Other application method capable ofachieving at least 65%transferefficiency. as certifiedbythemanufacturer, (3) All persons shall Qerform solvent cleaning orx:rations with cleaning material having

## voe contentof0.21 pounds per gallon
orless. ([;!]1) [The en'Her er epetfiler shall fl'lai-Hl!li-H reeertis lfelft !he ffll!HliffteRHer Hl!ll aefl'IBHS!ffile eBH'lplill!lee 

### illfh !he erHissiefl stll!la!lfas ef R397 348 4.]All sources subject to R307-345 shall maintain records demonstrating compliance with all provisions of R307-345 on an annual basis. fa) Records shall include. but not be limited to. inventory_ and product data sheets ofall coatings and solvents subject to R307- 

### ill.. (b) These records shall be available to the director UQOn

R307-345-6. OptionalAdd-On Controls. 

### ilL The owneroroperatormay install and maintain an incinerator, carbon adsorption, or any other add-on emission control device, provided that the emission control device will attain at least 90%efficiencyperformance. (2) The owner oroperatorofa control device shall provide documentation that the emission control system will attain the requirements ofR307-345-6.[eertifiefllieH lfefl'I the fl'l!lflttfttemrer th!ll the efl'lissiBH eeHtrel S)stefl'I 

# ""ill 1:1tt1:1ifl reqttirea effieieHe) perfarrHll!lee.] (3) Emission control systems shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum oftwo years records ofoperating and maintenance sufficientto demonstrate thatthe equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturerrecommendations.

R307-345-7. Compliance Schedule. (1) All sources in Davis and Salt Lake counties are subject to this rule upon the effective date. (2) All sources within Box Elder, Cache, Tooele, Utah and Weber counties shall be in compliance with this rule by January I, 2014.

KEY: airpollution,emission controls,fabric coating,vinyl coating DateofEnactmentorLastSubstantiveAmendment:**[~]2013** Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(1) (a)



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. IDAR File No. 36728 

# \\

# \ Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

# R307-346 etal Furniture Surface Coatings

TICE OF CHANGE IN PROPOSED RULE 

### DAR FILE NO.: 36728

FILED: 12/10/2012
RULE ANALYSIS PURPOSE F THE RULE OR REASON CHANGE: D ing the public comment period, akeholders and existing s all sources expressed their co cerns about the 2.7 tons pe year applicability being appli d to existing sources in Box der and Tooele counties. he EPA also submitted comm nts regarding the r cord keeping requirements. Th changes to the prop ed rule are in response to these co ments.
SUMMARY OF THE ULE OR CHAN E: Section R307- 346-2 is changed sta ·ng that in To ele and Box Elder counties, as of 02/01/ 13, the rul applies to existing sources as of 02/01/201 that have he potential to emit 5 tons per year or more of OC and pplies to new sources that have the potential toe "t 2.7 to s peryear or more

## voe. The rule still applies in Cac e, D is, Salt Lake, Utah, and Weber counties to sources th h e the potential to emit 2.7 tons per year or more VOC. a guage is added to Section R307-346-5 to clarify that exem solvents are not included in the VOC content limits for the ting used. Section R307- 346-6 is changed to require o ne and operators to maintain records demonstrating comp ance ith the rule on an annual basis and to require them t make t ose records available to the director upon reques. Subs tion R307-346-6(3) is amended by adding appli tion requir ents. Section R307- 346-7 is changed to cla fy that the o er or operator must provide documentation at the emissio control system will attain the requirement of Section R307- 6-6. (DAR NOTE: This change in pro osed rule has be n filed to make additional changes t a proposed new rule atwas published in the October 1, 2 12, issue of the Utah tate Bulletin, on page 69. Underlin· g in the rule below indica s text that has been added sin the publication of the reposed rule mentioned abov ; strike-out indicates text t t has been deleted. You st view the change in proposed ule and the proposed new ule together to understand all of e changes that will be forceable should the agency mak this rule effective.)
Y OR CONSTITUTIONALAUTHORIZATI : Subsection 19-2-104(1)(a)
ANTICI ATED COST OR SAVINGS TO: 

### + TH STATE BUDGET: The changes to this rule do resul in any new requirements to the state; therefore, th e are o anticipated costs or savings to the state budget. 

### +L CAL GOVERNMENTS: The changes to this rule do no re ult in any new requirements to local governments;



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, January 01, 2013,Vol. 2013, No. I NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES

erefore, there are no anticipated costs or savings to lo I g vernments. 

### + . .ALL BUSIN.ESSES: Because the rule's applicabir y to ex1s ng sources 1n Box Elder and Tooele counties is ch nged from ources with the potential to emit 2.7 tons per ye r

## voe to sou s with the the potential to emit 5tons per y r

## voe, the rul will apply to fewer sources in those counties, resulting in a savings of up to $2,220 per t of 

## voe removed. 

### + PERSO S OTHER THAN SMALL B SINESSES, BUSINESS , OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. L ENTITIES: Because ther are no new requirements fo persons other**tha~.** small bu inesses, businesses, or I cal government ent1t1es, there ar no anticipated costs or s ings.

THE FULL TEXT F THIS RULE M**~** BE INSPECTED DURING REGULA BUSINESS HOURS, , ENVIRO MENTAL QUALITY AIR Q LITY FOU H FLOOR 195 1950

# w SA LAKE CITY, UT 84116-3085 or t the Division ofAdministrative Rules
DIRECT UESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE T 

### + Mark erger by phone at 801-536-4000, by F at 801- 536-0 5, or by Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov

A THORIZED BY: Bryce Bird, Director

R307. Environmental Quality,AirQuality. R307-346. MetalFurnitureSurfaceCoatings. R307-346-1. Purpose. The purpose of this rule is to limit volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from metal furniture surface coating operations in aP.Plication 

## areas. flash-off areas. and ovens of metal_ furniture coating lines involved in prime and top-coat or single coat. Qperations.



### 57NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES

R307-346-2. Applicability. [R397 34 6 llflplies l6 !he llflplietttieH llfeliS, ilask elf ll!'eliS, Md e·;ens efmetal fiwltttttre eeatiHg liHes iH•el·;ed iH prime flftd tap eetttefsiHgle eetttepefatieHs, iHelt1diHgrelated eleflHiHg tteti·,ities, tkttt**l~tt•e**the peteHtial te emit2.7teHs peFyelifef\'OCttHa thateie leetttea in BeJ1 Elder, Caeke, Dads, Salt Laite, Tueele, 

### Utah t111d Weber 

### eettftties:.J(l) R307-346 applies to sources located in Cache Davis. SaltLake Utah and Weber counties thathave the potential to emit 2.7 tons peryearormoreofVOC.includingrelated cleaning activities. (2) In Box Elder and Tooele counties. R307-346 applies to the following sources: fa) Existing sources as of Februai:y 1. 2013 with the potential to emit 5 tons per year or more of

## voe. including related. cleaningactivities: and Cb) New sources as of Feb!Uai:y 1. 2013 that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons per year or more ofVOC. including related cleaning activities.

R307-346-3. Exemptions.
following:(1) The requirements of R307-346 do not apply to the
(a) Stencil coatings; (b) Safety-indicatingcoatings; (c) Solid-film lubricants; (d) Electrical-insulatingandthermal-conductingcoatings; (e) Touch-up andrepair coatings; or (f) Coating applicationsutilizinghand-held aerosol cans.
R307-346-4. Definitions. "Air dried coating" means coatings that are dried bythe use of air or a forced warm air at temperatures up to 194 degrees Fahrenheit. "Application area" means the area where the coating is appliedby spraying, dipping, orflow coatingtechniques. "Baked coating" means a coating that is cured at a temperature atorabove 194 degrees Fahrenheit. "Coating" means a protective, functional, or decorative film applied in athin layerto a surface.Thisterm appliesto paints, sealants, caulks, inks, adhesives, andmaskants. "Extreme performance coatings" means coatings designed for harsh exposure orextreme environmental conditions. "Maskants" means a material that protects a metal surface duringthe etchingprocess. "Metal furniture coating" means the surface coating ofany furniture made ofmetal or any metal partthat will be assembled with other metal, wood fabric, plastic, or glass parts to form a furniture piece.

R307-346-5. Emission Standards. Each owneroroperatorshall not apply coatings with a VOC content in excess ofthe amounts specified in Table 1 or shall use an add-on control device as specified inR307-346-7.

TABLE 1
METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING voe LIMITS (values in pounds of voe per gallon of coating, minus water_!lli! exempt solvents (compounds not classified as 

### voe, as applied)

58 DARFile No. 36728

COATING CATEGORY voe EMISSION RATE
Baked Air Dried
General, One Component 2.3 2. 3
General, Multi-Component 2.3 2.B

Extreme High Gloss 3.0 2.8

Extreme Performance 3.0 3.5

Heat Resistant 3.0 3.5
Metallic 3.5 3.5

Pretreatment Coatings 3.5 3.5

Solar Absorbent 3.0 3.5**R307-34~.** WorkPractices. (1) Theowneroroperatorshall: (a) Store all VOC-containing coatings, thinners, and cleaningmaterials in closed containers; (b) Minimize spills ofVOC-containing coatings, thinners, and cleaningmaterials; (c) Cleanup spills immediately; (d) Convey any coatings, thinners, and cleaningmaterials in closed containersorpipes; (e) Close mixing vessels that contain VOC coatings and othermaterials exceptwhen specifically in use; and (f) Minimize usage ofsolvents during cleaning ofstorage, mixing, and conveyingequipment. (2) No person shall apply any coating unless the coating applicationmethod achieves ademonstrated 65%transferefficiency. The following applications achieve a minimum of 65% transfer efficiency and shall be operated in accordance with the_ manufacturers specifications: (a) Electrostatic application: (bl Electrodeposition: (c) Brushcoat: Cd) Flowcoat: (e) Roll coat: (fl Dip coat: (g) Continuouscoating: (h) High-volume. low-pressure CliVLPl spray: or (i) Other application method capable ofachieving at least. 65%transferefficiency. as certifiedby the manufacturer. (3) All persons shall perform solvent cleaning operations with cleaning material having

## voe content of0.21 pounds per gallon
or less unless such cleaning o.perations are performed within the_ control ofthe emission control system ofR307-346-7. ([2]:!) [The en'Hef er eperllter shall mttkttaiH Feee1ds &em !he m!lfll:lfiletlH'eF !httt aemeRstl'l!tes eempliflHee 

### wi!h !he emissieR stttHdltfds ef R397 348 4.]All sources subject to R307-346 shall maintain records demonstrating compliance with all provisions of R307-346 on an annual basis. (a) Records shall include. but not be limited to inventory and product data sheets ofall coatings and solvents subject to R307-**~** fb) These records shall be available to the director upon

UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. IDAR File No. 36728

R307-346-7. OptionalAdd-On Controls. (I) The owner or operator may install and maintain an incinerator, carbon adsorption, or any other add-on emission control device, provided that the emission control device will attain at least 90%efficiency performance. (2) The owner or operator ofa control device shall provide [ee1'tifie11lieH !iem lhe H'l!lftttfoefttler that lhe emissien eeHtrel S)Stem will 11tllliH fetjttireti effieieHe) perferm!lftee]documentation that the emission control system will attain the requirements ofR307-346-7. (3) Emission control systems shall be operated and maintained in accordance with d1e manufacturer recommendations. The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum oftwo years records ofoperating and maintenance sufficientto demonstrate that the equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturerrecommendations.

R307-346-8. ComplianceSchedule. (I) All sources in Davis and Salt Lake counties are subject to this rule as ofthe effective date. (2) Sources in Box Elder, Cache, Utah, Tooele, and Weber counties shall be in compliance with the rule byJanuary I, 2014.

KEV: air pollution, emission controls, surface coating, metal furniture Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: 

### JiGHllO.!.J Authorizing, and Implemented orInterpreted Law: 19-2-104(1) (a)


# nvironmental Quality, Air Quality 

# R307-347 Appliance Surface Coa · gs
F CHANGE IN PROPOS



### AR FILE NO.: 36729

ILED: 12/10/2012

FOR THE

RULE OR CHANG

. Section R307- stating that in Tooele d Box Elder counties, the le applies to existing so ces as of 02/01/2013, t at have the potential to emit 5 tons er year or more of V C and applies to new sources that ave the potential emit 2.7 tons per year or more VOC. The le still applies · Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Utah, and Weber co ties to so ces that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons per yea or mer VOC. Language is added to Section R307-347-5



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. I NOTICES OFCHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES
clarify that exempt solvents are not included in the V C

ontent limits for the coating used. Section R307-347- is

anged to require owners and operators to maintain re rds d monstrating compliance with the rule on an annual asis an to require them to make those records available o the dire or upon request. Subsection R307-347- (3) is ame ded by adding application requirements. Secti R307- 347- is changed to clarify that the owner or oper tor must provid documentation that the emission control stem will attain t requirements of Section R307-347-7. ( J\R NOTE: This ch ge in proposed rule has been fil to make additional hanges to a proposed new rule that as published in the Oct er 1, 2012, issue of the Utah St e Bulletin, on page 71. U derlining in the rule below indicat s text that has been added since the publication of the proposed rule mentioned a ve; strike-out indicates te that has been deleted. You ust view the change in pro sed rule and the proposed new le together to understan all of the changes that will be enfo ceable should the ag cy make this rule effective.)

· The c anges to this rule do not result in any new require ents t the state; therefore, there are no anticipated costs or avin sto the state budget. 

### +LOCAL GOVERNMENT T e changes to this rule do not result in any new requir ents to local governments; therefore, there are no antic ated costs or savings to local governments. 

### +SMALL BUSINESSES: e se the rule's applicability to existing sources in Box El r an Tooele counties is changed from sources with the pot ntial to mit 2.7 tons per year

## voe to sources with the the p tential to mit 5tons per year

## voe, the rule will apply to fewer so ces in those counties, resulting in a saving of up to ,020 per ton of 

## voe removed. 

### + PERSONS OT ER BUSINESSES, 

### 0 Because there ar no new requiremen for persons other than small busi sses, businesses, or local government entities, there ar no anticipated costs or s wings.
PERSONS: Because the le's applicability to existing ources in Box Elder and 

### li ele counties is changed from so rces with the potential to mit 2.7 tons per year

## voe to so ces with the the potenti I to emit 5 tons per year VOC, the e will apply to fewer urces in those counties, resulting in a savings of up to $2, 20 perton of

## voe removed.
NTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSIN se the rule's applicability to existing sources 1 Box and Tooele counties is changed from sources wit the po ntial to emit 2.7 tons per year

## voe to sources with the th potential to emit 5 tons per year

## voe, the rule will ap lyNOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES

to fe er sources in those counties, resulting in a savings up to 

### $ 20 per ton of

## voe removed.

RULE TO: 

### + Mark Berger by one at 801-536-40 by FAX at 801- ernet E-mail at mberger@ ah.gov

R307. EnvironmentalQuality,AirQuality. R307-347. LargeAppliance SurfaceCoatings. R307-347-1. Purpose. The purpose of this rule is to reduce volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from large appliance surface coating operations.

R307-347-2. Applicability. [R397 347 fll'!'lies tti lltfge eppliMee et1eti11g t1peretit111s, i11el1:uii11g related eleMi11g eeti1ities, thet he1e the pt1te11tiel tti emit 2.7 tt111s e )eer tifVOC Biid thet B1e leeeted i11 Bel< Elder, Ceelie, 011•,.is, Salt Lake, Tueele, Utah, Bild Weber ee1:111ties.]ID R307-347 applies to
sources located in Cache. Davis. Salt Lak:e. Utah and Weber counties. that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons per year or more of

## voe._ including related cleaning activities, (2) In Box Elder and Tooele counties R307-347 applies to the following sources: (a) Existing sources as ofFebruary I, 2013. that have the potential to emit 5 tons per year or more ofVOC. including related. cleaning activities· and (bl New sources as of February I, 2013. that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons per year or more ofVOC. including related cleaningactivities.

R307-347-3. Exemptions. following:(I) The requirements of R307-347 do not apply to the (a) Stencil coatings; (b) Safety-indicatingcoatings; (c) Solid-film lubricants; (d) Electric-insulatingand thermal-conductingcoatings; (e) Touch-up and repair coatings; or (t) Coating application utilizing hand-held aerosol cans.
R307-347-4. Definitions. The following additional definitions apply to R307-347: "Air dried coating" means coatings that are dried by the use

60 DAR File No. 36729

of air or a forced warm air at temperatures up to 194 degrees Fahrenheit. "Baked coating" means a coating that is cured at a temperature atorabove 198 degrees Fahrenheit. "Coating" means a protective, functional, or decorative film applied in a thin layer to a surface. This term often applies to paints such as lacquers orenamels. It is also used to referto films applied to paper, plastics, orfoil. "Ell.1reme performance coatings" means coatings designed forharsh exposure orextreme environmental conditions. "Large appliances" means doors, cases, lids, panels, and interior support parts ofresidential and commercial washers, dryers, ranges, refrigerators, freezers, water heaters, dishwashers, trash compactors, airconditioners, and othersimilarproducts.

R307-347-5. Emission Standards. Each owneroroperatorshall not apply coatings with aVOC content in excess ofthe amounts specified in Table 1or shall use an add-on control device as specifiedin R307-347-7.

TABLE 1 Large Appliance Coating Limitations (values in pounds 

### voe per gallon of coating, minus water...!Ul! exempt solvents(compounds not classified as VOC), as applied)
COATING CATEGORY 

### voe EMISSION RATES
Baked Air Dried
Genera1, one component 2.3
Genera1, multi-component 2.3

Extreme high gloss 3.0
Extreme performance 3.0
Heat resistance 3.0
Solar absorbent 3.0
Metallic 3.5

Pretreatment coatings 3.5
R307-347-6. WorkPracticesandRecordkeeping. (1) The owneroroperatorshall: 2.3

2.8

2.8
3.5
3.5

3.5
3.5

3.5

(a) Store all VOC-containing coatings, thinners, and cleaningmaterials in closed containers; (b) Minimize spills ofVOC-containing coatings, thinners, and cleaningmaterials; (c) Clean up spills immediately; (d) Convey any coatings, thinners, and cleaning materials in closed containers orpipes; (e) Close mixing vessels that contain VOC coatings and othermaterialsexceptwhen specifically in use; and (f) Minimize usage ofsolvents during cleaning ofstorage, mixing, and conveyingequipment. (2) All sources subjectto R307-347[The e·n•11ertirt1pe1eter] shall maintain records [lftim the mflHttfaetttrerthet ]demonstrat[es]in.g compliance with all provisions ofR307-347 on an annual basis,[tfte. emissit111 steridlll'ds tifR397 348 S.]

UTAHSTATEBULLETIN,January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. IDARFile No. 36729

(a) Records shall include. but not be limited to. inventory and product data sheets ofall coatings and solvents subject to R307- 

### fil (b) These records shall be made available to the director upon request (3) No person shall apply any coating unless the coating application method achieves a demonstrated 65% transfer efficiency. The following applications achieve a minimum of 65% transfer_ efficiency and shall be operated in accordance with the manufacturers specifications: (a) Electrostatic application: (bl Electrodeposition: (cl Brushcoat' (d) Flowcoat· (el Roll coat: (Q Dipcoat· (g) High-volume. low-pressure (HVLP) spray: or (h) Other application method capable ofachieving at least 65% transfer efficiency. as certified by the manufacturer. (4) All persons shall perfonn solvent cleaning operations with cleaning materials having

## voe content of0.21 pounds per gallon 

### !lill.&.

R307-347-7. OptionalAdd-On Controls. (1) The owneroroperatormay install andmaintain an incinerator, carbon adsorption, or any other add-on emission control device, provided that the emission control device will attain at least 90%efficiencyperfonnance. (2) The owneror operator ofa control device shall provide [eeftifieatieH)documentation [ffiiffi the ffiflllttfaeatreF ]thatthe emission control system will attain the require[tl]ments of R307-347- 1[eftieieHe) l"erfufffifll!ee]. (3) Emission control systems shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum oftwo years records ofoperating and maintenance sufficientto demonstrate**~at**the equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturerrecommendations.

R307-347-8. ComplianceSchedule. (I) All sources in Davis and Salt Lake counties are subject to this rule as ofthe effective date ofthisrule. (2) Sources in Box Elder, Cache, Tooele, Utah and Weber counties shall be in compliancewith thisrule byJanuary I, 2014.

KEY: air pollution, emission controls, large appliance, surface coating DateofEnactment orLastSubstantiveAmendment: [ioH)2013 Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(1) (a) 

# .- 1 

# ty

UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, January 01, 2013,Vol. 2013, No. I NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES



### NOTICE OF CHANGE IN PROPOSED RULE 

### DAR FILE NO.: 36730

FILED: 12/10/2012
RULE ANALYSIS OSE OF THE RULE OR REASON FO CHA GE: During the public comment period, the D. ision of Air Qu lity (DAQ) received several comments fro the EPA and the 'ndustry that resulted in the need to make bstantive changes othe proposed rule.
SUMMAR OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The pplicability of the rule is anged to only apply to existing urces in Box Elder and**~** oele counties as of 02/01/201 that have the potential to e it 5tons per year or more of

### V. C and to apply to new sour in Box Elder and Tooel counties as of 02/01/2013 that ave the potential to emit .7 tons per year or more VOC. The ule still applies in Gach , Davis, Salt Lake, Utah, and Weber ounties to sources th t have the potential to emit 2.7 tons pe year or more VOC Language is added to Subsection R30 348-4(1) to clari that exempt solvents are not included in th VOC coating c ntent limits. Language is added to Subsectio R307-348-5( to require that sources make records availa le to the director upon request. Subsection R307-348- 2) is ch nged to clarify that the owner or operator of a gnet 

### w. e coatings operation shaU provide documentation th t the mission control system will attain the requirements of cti n R307-348-6. (DAR NOTE: This change in proposed r e has been filed to**~ake** additional changes to a propo ed new rule that was published in the October 1, 2012, iss of the Utah State Bulletin, on page 73. Underlining in the rul below indicates text that has been added since the bli ion of the proposed rule mentioned above; strike ut in ·cates text that has been deleted. You must view e chang in proposed rule and the proposed new rule tog er to und stand all of the changes that will be enforceab should the agency make this rule effective.)
STATUTORY OR C NSTITUTIONALA THORIZATION FOR THIS RULE: Subs ction 19-2-104(1)(a)
ANTICIPATED C ST OR SAVINGS TO: +THE STATE DGET: There are no ne the state; ther ore, there are no anticipated to the state b get. + LOCAL G ERNMENTS: There are no ne requirements to local go ernments; therefore, there are n anticipated costs or sa ings to local governments. + SMALL USINESSES: Because the rule's ap icability to existing urces in Box Elder and Tooele counties i changed from so rces with the potential to emit 2.7 tons per ar

## voe to sour es with the potential to emit 5tons per year C, the rule 

### w. I apply to fewer sources in those counties, res ting in a sa ngs of up to $8,528 peryear per small source.NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES



### + PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BU NESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIE Ther are no new requirements; therefore, there are anticip ed costs or savings to persons other than busines s, businesses, or local government entities.
COSTS FOR AFFECTED Because the rule's applicability to existing sourc s in Box Elder and Too le counties is changed from sour s with the potential to emi 2.7 tons per year

## voe to so ces with the potential to emit tons per year 

## voe, the r will apply to fewer sources in t se counties, resulting in savings of up to $8,528 

### per year p small source.

isting sources in Box d from sources with the 

## voe to sources with the 

## voe, the rule will apply to

, resulting in a savings of up ur

.

DIRECT Q 

### STIONS REGARDING THIS RULE • Mark B ger by phone at 801-536-4000, 

### by F at 801- 536-008 ,

### or by Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov

HORIZED BY: Bryce Bird, Director

R307. EnvironmentalQuality,AirQuality. R307-348. MagnetWireCoatings. R307-348-1. Purpose. The purpose of this rule is to limit volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from ovens of magnet wire coating operations.

R307-348-2. Applicability. [R397 34 8 fl!'!'lies t6 mttgHet ol'ire eetttiHg 6flel'lltiens thttt Hlt'te Eke p6teHtiHI t6 emit 2.7t6H3 perye!ll ef

## voe HHS ll!'e leeHted iH BellElder, Ctteke,DH,is, !>HitLHlce,Tueele,Ul:!lfl

## HHeWebere6ttftties.] (I) R307-348 applies to sources located in Cache Davis. Salt Lake. Utah and Weber counties that have the potential to emit 27 tons per. yearormore ofVOC includingrelatedcleaning activities

62 DARFileNo. 36730

(2) In Box Elder and Tooele counties. R307-348 applies to thefollowing sources· lal Existing sources as of February I. 2013. with the potential to emit 5 tons per

## vear or more ofvoe. including related. cleaning activities: and (bl New sources 

### as of February I. 2013. that have the potential to emit 2,7 tons peryear or more ofVOC including related cleaningactivities,

R307-348-3. Definitions. The following additional definition appliesto R307-348: "Magnet wire coating" means the process of applying coating of electrical insulating varnish or enamel to aluminum or copperwire foruse in electrical machinery.

R307-348-4. Emission Standards. (I)No owneroroperatorofamagnetwire coatingoven may cause, alloworpermitdischarge into the atmosphere ofanyVOC[s] in
excess of0.20 kilograms per liter ofcoating (l.7 pounds per gallon), excluding water, and exempt solvents (compounds not classified 

### as VOCsl delivered to the coating applicator from magnet wire coating operations. (a) Equivalency calculations for coatings shall be performed in units ofpounds voespergallon ofsolid rather than pounds voes pergallon ofcoatingwhen determining compliance. (b) The equivalent emission limit is 2.2 pounds voes per gallon solids. (2) The emission limitations specified above shall be achieved by: (a) The application of low solvent content coating technology; or (b) The use ofan add-on control device on magnet wire coatingovens as specified in R307-348-6.

R307-348-5. WorkPracticesandRecordkeeping. (I) The owneroroperatorshall: (a) Store all VOC-containing coatings and cleaning materials in closed containers; (b) Minimize spills of VOC-containing coatings and cleaningmaterials; (c) Cleanup spillsimmediately; (d) Convey any coatings, thinners, and cleaningmaterials in closed containers orpipes; (e) Close mixing vessels that contain VOC coatings and othermaterials exceptwhen specificallyinuse; and (t) Minimize usage ofsolvents during cleaning ofstorage, mixing, and conveyingequipment. (2) [The eo'll:efar epel'lltar skttll mttifttHifl reeel't!s lfem !he ft'IMttfftetl:tler

### thHtdemeHstl'llte eeffl!'lillfteewiEk the efflissiaH stllftdHl't!s efR397 348 4.]All sourcessubjecttoR307-348 shall maintainrecords demonstrating compliance with all provisions ofR307-348 and these. records shall be availabletothedirectoru.oonrequest.**R307-34~.** OptionalAdd-On Controls. (I) The owneroroperatormayinstall and maintain an incineratorprovidedthatthe emission control devicewill attain at least 90%efficiencyperformance.

UTAHSTATEBULLETIN,January 01, 2013,Vol. 2013, No. I

### DARFile No. 36730

(2) The owneroroperatorofa control device shall provide [eel'titiee!iealdocwnentation that the emission control system will attain therequirements ofR307-348-6 [ifflm the m1111ttfeeftlfefthetthe efflissieH eea!fflJ S)'S!efflwilJ 

### 11MftiHreqttifeaeffieieae) peffefflll!Hee.] (3) Emission control systems shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum oftwo years records ofoperating and maintenance sufficientto demonstrate thatthe equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturerrecommendations.
R307-348-7. Compliance Schedule. (1) All sources in Davis and Salt Lake counties are subject to thisrule 

### as ofthe effective date ofthis rule. (2) Sources in Box Elder, Cache, Utah, Tooele, and Weber counties shallbe in compliancewiththis rule by January 1, 2014.


### KEY: air pollution, emission controls, surface coating, magnet wire Date ofEnactmentorLastSubstantiveAmendment:**[~)2013** 

### Authorizing, and Implemented orInterpreted Law: 19-2-104(1) (a)


# Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

# R307-349 Flat Wood Panel Coatings

OF CHANGE IN PROPOSED 

### DAR FILE NO.: 36731

FILED: 12/10/2012

SUMMARY OF THE RU OR C FOR THE

349-2 is changed staf g that in ele and Box Elder counties, the rule plies to exist1 sources as of 02/01/2013, that hav the potential to emi 5 tons per year or more of VOC and applies to new sour that have the potential to emit 2 tons per year or more VO

. The rule still applies in Gach , Davis, Salt Lake, Utah, and ber counties to sources tha ave the potential to emit 2.7 ton more VOC. A definition for "Strippable booth ating" is added to S tion R307-349-3. Language is added t Section R307-349 to clarify that exempt solvents are not incl ed in the VO content limits for the coating used. Subs ion R307- 149-5(2) is amended by adding applica ·on requ· ements. Subsection R307-349-5(4) is changed



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. 1 NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES

require owners and operators to maintain reco s demonstrating compliance with the rule on an annual b sis

nd to require them to make those records available t the ·rector upon request. Section R307-349-6 is chang d to cl rify that the owner or operator must provide docume tation tha the emission control system will attain {he requir ments of ection R307-349-6. (DAR NOTE: This ch nge in prop ed rule has been filed to make additional cha ges to a propo d new rule that was published in the Octob 1, 2012, issue o the Utah State Bulletin, on page 74. Un erlining in the rule elow indicates text that has been add since the publicatio of the proposed rule mentioned abo e; strike-out indicates xt that has been deleted. You ust view the change in oposed rule and the proposed ne rule together to understa all of the changes that will e enforceable should the ag ncy make this rule effective.)
STATUTORY 

### 0 CONSTITUTIONALAUT THIS RULE: Su section 19-2-104(1)(a)

COMPLIANCE FOR AFF TED PERSONS: Because the rule' applicability to exist g sources in Box Elder and Tooele aunties is changed fro sources with the potential to emit .7 tons per year 

## voe to sources with the the potential to mit 5 tons per year

## voe, t rule will apply to fewer sour in those counties, resulting ·n a savings of up to $2,110 p rton of

## voe removed.
COMMENT BY THE DEPARTMENT HEA FISCAL IM**~CT** THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BU Because e rule's applicability to existing sour s in Box Elder an Tooele counties is changed from source with the potential 0 emit 2.7 tons per year

## voe to sources ith the the pot tial to emit 5 tons per year VOC, the rule WI apply to few r sources in those counties, resulting in a savi gs of up to 2, 110 perton of

## voe removed.



### 63NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES

THE LL TEXT OF THIS RULE MAY BE INSPECT DURING GULAR BUSINESS HOURS, AT: EN ONMENTAL QUALITY AIR Q LITY FOURTH OOR 195 N 1950 SALT LAKE Cl

R307. Environmental Quality,AirQuality. R307-349. FlatWood PanelCoatings. R307-349-l. Purpose. The pwpose of R307-349 is to limit volatile organic compound (VOC)emissions from flatwoodpaneling coating sources.
R307-349-2. Applicability. [R397 349 llf'!'lies te flat weetl paneliHg eefttiHg epel'!llieHs, ir.elt1tliflgFeltttetl ele1tt1ir1g aeti¥iaes, iliatha1

### edie peteHaal te emit 

### 2.7 t6HS per)eM efVOC 11Htliliftt 1t1e leeatetl in Bex EltleF, Caehe, Dlt"lis, 8altLake, 'Feeele, Utttk, Mt! Webe1 eettHties.

### ](J) R307-349 aoplies to sources located jn Cache Davis Salt Lake. Utah and Weber counties. that have the potential to emit 2 7 tons per year or more ofvoe._ including related cleaning activities (2) 

### In Box Elder and Tooele counties R307-349 apples to the following sources: (a) Existing sources as of February I. 2013 with the_ potential to emit 5 tons per year or more ofvoe. including related. cleaning activities: and (b) New sources as of February I. 2013 that have the potential to emit 2,7 tons peryear or more ofvoe including related cleaning activities,

R307-349-3. Definitions. The following additional definitions applyto R307-349: "Coating" means a protective, decorative, or functional material applied in a thin layer to a surface. Such materials may include paints, topcoats. varnishes, sealers, stains, washcoats, basecoats, inks, andtemporary protective coatings. "Finishing material" means a coating used in the flat wood panel industry, including basecoats, stains, washcoats, sealers, and topcoats. "Flat wood paneling" means wood paneling products that
are any decorative interior, exterior or tileboard (class I hardboard) panel to which aprotective, decorative, or functional material or layer has been applied. "Sealer" means afinishing material used to seal the pores of
a wood substrate before additional coats of finishing material are applied. Awashcoatused to optimize aesthetics is notasealer. "Strippablebooth coating" means acoating thatis applied to a booth wall to provide a protective film to receive oyerspra,y during

64 DARFile No. 36731

finishing and that is subsequently peeled and disposed. Strippable booth coatings 

### are intended to reduce 

### or eliminate the need to use_**o~anic** solvents tocleanboothwalls "Tileboard" means apremium interiorwall panelingproduct made ofhardboard that meets the specifications for Class I given by the standardANSVAHAAJ35.4-1995.

R307-349-4. Emission Standards. (I) Each owner or operator shall not apply coatings with a voe content in excess of2.1 pounds ofvoe per gallon, excluding water and exempt solvents (compounds not classified as VOC). The equivalent emission limit shall be 2.9 pounds voesper gallon solids coating; or (2) Each owner or operator shall use an add-on control device as specifiedin R307-349-6.

R307-349-S. WorkPracticeandRecordkeeping. (I) The owneroroperatorshall: (a) Store all VOC-containing coatings, thinners, and cleaning materials in closed containers; (b) Minimize spills ofVOC-containing coatings, thinners, and cleaningmaterials; (c) Clean up spills immediately; (d) Convey any coatings, thinners, and cleaningmaterials in closed containersorpipes; (e) Close mixing vessels that contain VOC coatings and othermaterials exceptwhen specificallyinuse; and (f) Minimize usage ofsolvents during cleaning ofstorage, mixing, and conveyingofequipment. (2) No person shall apply anY coating unless the coating applicationmethod achieves ademonstrated 65%transferefficiency. The following applications achieve a minimum of 65% transfer efficiency and shall be onerated in accordance with the manufacturers specifications: fa) 

### Paintbrush: fb) Flowcoat· (c) Roll coat· fd) Dip coat: (e) Detailingortouch-up 

### guns: (e) High-volume. low-pressure <H\TLP) spray· (Q Hand application methods: or fg) Other application method capable ofachieving at least 65%transferefficiency !IScertifiedbythemanufacturer, (3) No person shall use omanic solvents for cleaning operations that exceed avoecontentofO 21 pounds per gallon and a strippable booth coating with a voe content in excess of3,8 pounds per gallon. excluding Water and exempt solvents (compounds that

## are notdefined asYOC)**([~]:!)** [The en'llef er epefftter shall H!ainaM reeertls WeHI the H!anttfaetttrer iliftt tleH!eHs!fllte eeHlpliMee 11-iili ilie el!l:issieH s!tt!ltlflftls ef R397 348 4.]All sources subject to R307-349 shall maintain records demonstrating compliance with all provisions of R307-349 on an annual basis. fa) Records should include butnotbe limited to. inventoQ' and products data sheets ofall coatings and solvents subject to R307- lli, fb) TI1ese records shall be available to the Director upon

UTAHSTATEBULLETIN,January OJ, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. IDARFile No. 36731

R307-349-6. OptionalAdd-OnControls. (1) The owneroroperatormayinstall andmaintain an incinerator, carbon adsorption, or any other add-on emission control device, provided that the emission control device will attain at least 90%efficiencyperformance. (2) The owneroroperator ofa control device shall provide [eel'tiiiealiefl ifem !he fflllll:ttfuefttler !hllt !he emissieH eeHtrel s,stem 

### will llttain 

### Feljt!Wed**elfleieHe~** iierfel'fllBHee]documentation that the emission control systemwill

### attain therequirements ofR307-349-6. (3) Emission control systems shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum of two years records ofoperating andmaintenance sufficienttodemonstrate thatthe equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturerrecommendations.
R307-349-7. ComplianceSchedule. (1) All sources in Davis and Salt Lake counties are subject to thisrule as ofthe effective date ofthisrule. (2) Sources in Box Elder, Cache, Tooele, Utah and Weber counties shall be in compliancewiththis rule byJanuary 1, 2014.

KEY: airpollution,emission controls,flat wood paneling,coatings DateofEnactmentorLastSubstantiveAmendment:**[~)lill** Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(1) (a)


# Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

# R307-350 cellaneous Metal Parts a Products Coatings

CHANGE IN PROPO

R FILE NO.: 3673 LED: 12/10/201

FOR THE



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. 1 NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES

more of VOC and applies to new sources that have t e potential to emit 2.7 tons per year or more VOC. The rule till applies in Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Utah, and Weber cou ies o sources that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons per y r or

ore VOC. The exemptions section of the rule was ch nged b adding surface coating of aerospace vehicl and co ponents and military munitions manufactured b or for the rmed Forces of the United States as exempt f m Rule R30 350. A definition for "Aerospace veh' les and comp ent" was added to Section R307-350-4. nguage is added Section R307-350-5 to clarify that exe pt solvents are not 'ncluded in the 

## voe content limits 

### fa the coating used. Section R307-350-6 is changed by adding electrode sition as an acceptable applicati n method. A VOC conte t for cleaning material is added t Section R307- 350-7. Se tion R307-350-7 is also ch ged to require owners and perators to maintain recor s demonstrating compliance wi the rule on an annual b sis and to require them to make ose records available the director upon request. (DAR OTE: This change i proposed rule has been filed to mak additional changes t a proposed new rule that was publishe in the October 1, 12, issue of the Utah State Bulletin, on ge 76. Under· ing in the rule below indicatestext that ha been added si ce the publication ofthe proposed rule mentio ed above; s 1ke-out indicates text that has been deleted. Yo must vie the change in proposed rule and the proposed w rule gether to understand all of the changes that will be force le should the agency make this rule effective.)
lONALAUTHORIZATION FOR 104(1)(a)

SES: Because the rule's applicability to existing sources i Box Elder and Tooele aunties is changed from sources wi the potential to emit 2.7 ans per year VOC to sources with he the potential to emit 5 t s per year

## voe, the rule will apply to fewer sources in those counties, resulting in a avings from $238 up to $2,02 erton of

## voe removed. 

### + PERS S OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINES ES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTA Because here are no new requirements for pe sons other than s all businesses, businesses, or local vernment entities there are no anticipated costs or savings.
LlANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PE Be use the rule's applicability to existing sources El r and Tooele counties is changed from sources wi p ential to emit 2.7 tons per year 

## voe to sources wit the t e potential to emit 5 tons per year 

## voe, the rule will a ly

65NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSEDRULES

## TH~ LL TEXT OF THIS RULE MAY BE INSPE DURING GULAR BUSINESS HOURS, AT: EN ONMENTAL QUALITY AIR Q LITY FOURTH OOR 195 N 1950 

### SALT LAKE Cl

R307. Environmental Quality,AirQuality. R307-352. MetalContainer,Closure,and Coil Coatings. R307-352-1. Purpose. The ptrrpose of this rule is to reduce volatile organic compound (VOe) emissions from the coating of metal coils, cans, [tlrttms;-]pails, and lids in the manufacturingorreconditioningprocess.
R307-352-2. Applicability. [R307 3S2 tlpj'lies te t\11 eetltiHg epeitltietls, iHeltttliflg rellltetl ele!tlling tleti 'ities, in the H'll!flttfaetttring er reeeHtlitieniflg ef mettll et\llS, tit tt!l'IS, pl!ils, 111'16 lies tfttlt htl,e the petentitll te efflit 2.7 ten! t\ )ell!' efVOC !lfltt tkllt 111e leelltetl ifl Bex Eltler, Ctlehe, DR.is, Stllt Llllre, Tueele, Ult\h !tlltt \lleeer eetlflties.

### ](J) R307-352 applies to
sources located in Cache. Davis Salt Lake Utah and Weber counties that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons per year or more ofvoe._ includingrelated cleaning activities. (2) In Box Elder and Tooele Counties. R307-352 applies to the following sources: (a) Existing sources as of February 1 2013 with the potential to emit 

### 5 tons per year or more ofvoe. including related. cleaningactivities· and <bl New sources as of February I 2013 that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons per year ormore ofVOC including related cleaning activities.

R307-352-3. Definitions. The following additional definitions applyto R307-352: "[teit-eJ.coating" means a protective. functional or ciecorative film applied in athin layerto a surface.[t\fl)' eetltiug t\pj'lietl te mettll sheets er sl:fips whieh 111e then relletl inte eeils fur fttr'.her intlttsb'itl! ereelfllflereitll ttse.] "End sealing compound" means a compound which is coated onto can ends and which functions as a gasket when the end is assembled ontothe can. "Exterior body spray" means a coating sprayed on the exterior ofthe container body to provide a decorative or protective finish. "Interiorbody spray" means a coatingsprayedon the interior ofthe can body to provide a protective film between the product and the can.

74 DARFileNo. 36734

"Metal container or closure coating" means any coating applied to eitherthe interiororexteriorofformed metal cans, [tlrttms;-] pails, lids or crowns or flat metal sheets which 

### are intended to 

### be formed into**cans,[~]** pails, lids orcrowns. "Overvarnish" means a coating applied directly over a design coatingto reducethe coefficientoffriction, to providegloss and to protectthe finish againstabrasion and corrosion. "Reconditioned [tlrttms;--]pails or lids" means any metal containerwhich is reused, recycled orremanufactured. "Three-piece can side-seam coating" means a coating sprayed on the exterior and/or interior of a welded, cemented or soldered seamtoprotecttheexposedmetal. ''Two-piece can exterior-end coating" means a coating applied to the exteriorbottom end ofa can to reduce the coefficient of friction and toprovideprotectionto themetal.

R307-352-4. Emission Standards. Each owneroroperatorshall not apply coatingswith avoe content in excess ofthe amounts specified in Table 1 or shall use an add-on control device as specified in R307-352-6.

TABLE 1

METAL CONTAINER AND CLOSURE COIL COATING LIMITATIONS (values in pounds voe per gallon of coating, minus waterJ!!l[ exempt solvents (comoounds not classified as VOC), as applied)
COATING CATEGORY 

### voe EMISSION RATES
CANS
Sheet basecoat (interior and exterior) and overvarnish 1.9 Two-piece can exterior basecoat, overvarnish, and end coating 2.1
Interior body spray Two-piece cans 3.5 Three-piece cans 3.0 Three-piece can side seam spray 5.5
End sealing compound: Food cans, non-food cans, and beverage cans 0.1
Exterior body spray [9AOO,-]PAILS AND LIDS Body spray
Reconditioned interior
Reconditioned exterior

New interior
New exterior
End sealing compound[1 Feed ll•1111s aRil ReR feed """"'s] Inks, all applications

Coil Coil coating 3.5

4.2

3.5

3.5
2.8

0.5

2.5

1.7

UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, January 01, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. 1DARFileNo. 36734

R307-3S2-S. WorkPracticesandRecordkeeping. (1) The owneroroperatorshall: (a) Store all VOC-containing coatings, thinners, and cleaningmaterials in closed containers; (b) Minimize spills ofVOC-containing coatings, thinners, andcleaningmaterials; (c) Cleanup spills immediately; (d) Convey any coatings, thinners, and cleaningmaterials in closed containers orpipes; (e) Close mixing vessels that contain VOC coatings and othermaterials exceptwhen specifically inuse; and (f) Minimize usage ofsolvents during cleaning ofstorage, mixing, and conveyingequipment. (2) No person shall apply any coating un]ess the coating applicationmethod achieves ademonstrated 65%transferefficiency. The following aoolications achieve a minimum of 65% transfer efficiency and shall be operated in accordance with the manufacturers specifications: (a) Electrostatic application: <b) Flowcoat: (c) Roll coat: (d) Dipcoat: (e) High-volume. low-pressure CHVLP) spray: (D Hand application methods: (g) Printing techniaues: or Ch) Other amilication method capable ofachieving at least 65%transferefficiency. as certifiedbythe manufacturer. f3) All persons shall oerform solvent cleaning operations with cleaningmaterial having

## voe contentof0.21 lb/gallonorless. ([i!]:!) [The 6dtter er 6flerliter sk11ll m11iritttifl reeeffis tfem l:lte ft'lllllttflleftlfer lhlll eemeflstrllles etltt'lflli1111ee uil:lt l:lte emissiefl st1111ellffis ef R397 348 4.]All sources subject to R307-352 shall maintain records demonstrating compliance with all provisions of R307-352 on an annual basis. fa) Records shall include. but not be limited to. inventory and product data sheets ofall coatings and solvents subject to R307- 

### ill. (b) These records shall be made available to the director upon request.
R307-3S2-6. OptionalAdd-On Controls. (1) The owner or operator may install and maintain an incinerator, carbon adsorption, or any other add-on emission control device, provided that the emission control device will attain at least 90%efficiencyperformance. (2) The owner oroperator ofa control device shall provide [eertifieetieA]documentation [&em the ft'lllflttflleftlfer ]thatthe emission control system will**attain~** requirements[e] of R307-352-**~[**effieieAey fleri&mllf!ee]. (3) Emission control systems shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations. The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum oftwo years records ofoperating and maintenance sufficienttodemonstrate thatthe equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturerrecommendations.



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, January 01, 2013,Vol. 2013, No. 1 NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES

R307-352-7. ComplianceSchedule. All sources within Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake. Tooele, Utah and Weber counties shall be in compliance with this rule byJanuary 1, 2014.

KEY: air pollution, emission controls, metal containers, coil coatings DateofEnactmentorLastSubstantiveAmendment: [2GH]2013 Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(1) (a)


# Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

# R307-353 Plastic Parts Coatings

JICE OF CHANGE IN PROPOSED 

### DAR FILE NO.: 36735

FILED: 12/10/2012
RULE ANALYSIS THE RULE OR REA N FOR THE CHANGE: Duri g the public comment p iod, stakeholders and existing sma sources expressed t ir concerns about the 2.7 tons per ar applicability bei applied to existing sources in Box El r and Tooele co ties. The EPA also submitted comme s regarding the record-keeping requirements, a lack f a 

## voe c ntent limit for cleaning materials, and the lac of transf efficiency requirements. The changes to the pro sed ru are in response to these comments.
R CHANGE: Section R307- t in Tooele and Box Elder counties, the rule appli s o existing sources as of 02/01/2013, that have the oten ·al to emit 5 tons per year or more of 

## voe and app es to n w sources that have the potential to emit 2.7 to per year more VOC. The rule still applies in Cache, Dav· , Salt Lake, tah, and Weber counties to sources that have e potential to it 2.7 tons per year or more 

## voe. Sect· n R307-353-4 i amended by adding definitions for " etaIlic coating," ' ilitary specification coating," "mirror acking," "mold-seal co ting," "multi-colored coating," "m i-component coating," "one-component coating," and" ptical coating." Language i added to Section R307-353-5 clarify that exempt solvents a not included in the VOC c tent limits for the coating used. Table 3, which lists new lastic product coating categories d their 

## voe emission imits, is also added to Section R307- 3-5. A new Section 307-353-6 is added for coating applicati n methods. Sectio R307-353-7 is changed by adding a V C content limit or cleaning materials and by requiring o ers and ope tors to maintain records demonstrating complia ce withNOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES

R307. Environmental Quality,AirQuality. R307-354. AutomotiveRefinishingCoatings. R307-354-l. Purpose. The purpose of R307-354 is to limit volatile organic compound emissions (VOC) from automotiverefinishing sources.
R307-354-2. Applicability. 

### [R3G7 354 epplies te 1tt1l6m6ti•e refinishing s6tlf'ees, iHelttttiflg rel11tetl elellftiflg 6perllli6HS, th11t h11•e the p6leflti11I te emit 2.7 t6f1S per)elll 6P/OCllfltt 11re IBe11tetl in B6i< Eltler, C11ehe, Dll'tis, S11lt Lake, Tuaele, Utllh llfttt Webere6t111ties.]m R307-354 applies to sources located in Cache Davis. Salt Lake Utah and Weber counties. that have the potential to emit 2 7 tons per year or more of

## voe
. includingrelatedcleaning activities. (2) 

### In Box Elder and Tooele coypties. R307-354 applies to the following sources· fal Existing sources 

## as of February I. 2013 with the potential to emit 5 tons per year or more of

## voe including related. cleaning activities: and (bl New sources as of February I. 2013 that have the potential to emit 2.7 tons per year or more ofVOC including related cleaning activities. (3) The requirements ofR307-354 shall not apply to any canned aerosol coatingproducts.

R307-354-3. Definitions. The following additional definitions applyto R307-354: "Adhesion promoter" means a coating which is labeled and formulated to be applied to uncoated plastic surfaces to facilitate bonding ofsubsequentcoatings, and on which, asubsequentcoating is applied. "Automotive" means passenger cars, vans, motorcycles, trucks, buses, golfcartsand all othermobile equipment. "Automotive refinishing" means the process of coating automobiles. after-market automobiles, motorcycles, light and medium-duty trucks and vans that are performed in auto body shop.:i, auto repair shops, production paint shops, new car dealer repair and paint shops, fleet operation repair and paint shops, and any other facility which coats vehicles under the Standard Industrial Classification Code 7532 (Top, Body and Upholstery Repair Shops and Paint Shops). This includes dealer repair ofvehicles damaged in transit. It does not include refinishing operations for other types of mobile equipment, such as farm machinery and construction equipmentortheirparts, includingpartial body collisionrepairs, that is subsequent to the original coating applied at an automobile original equipmentmanufacturingplant.

80 DARFile No. 36736

"Clearcoating" means any coatingthatcontains nopigments and is labeled and formulated for application over a color coating or clearcoating. "Coating" means a protective, decorative, or functional material applied in a thin layer to a surface. Such materials may include paints, topcoats, varnishes, sealers, stains, washcoats, basecoats, inks, andtemporary protective coatings. "Color coating" means any pigmented coating, excluding adhesion promoters, primers, and multi-color coatings, that requires a subsequent clear coating and which is applied over aprimer, adhesion promoter, or color coating. Color coatings include metallic and iridescentcolorcoatings. [ "Cttt ifl, 6rjllfflhing, elearea11t" nteftfls 11 fast BF)iHg; relltt) te spr11) eleftfe611tepplietl te s1:11fuees stteh 11S tt66rjllfflhs llfttttrttnkllfttt h66tl etlges t6 11116" fur qttiekel6Stll'e. "El11Stemerie ea11tiHg" ntellfls 11 eBllliflg tlesignetl fBr epplieftti6fl 6'erllei<ible plllts, stteh llSel11Stemeriebttffipers. ] "Enclosedpaintgun cleaner" means acleanerconsistingofa closed containerwith adoorortop that can be opened and closed and fitted with cleaning connections. The spray gun is attached to a connection, and solvent is pumped through the gun and onto the exterior of the gun. Cleaning solvent falls back into the cleaner's solventreservoirforrecirculation. [ "Finishing mllteriftl" mellfts 11 e611liflgttsetl in

### the 11ttt6ffl6ti.e ret'i11ishiflg iflttt!StF)', ineltteiflg b11Seeallts, st11iHS, "11She611ls, seftlers, llftttlepe611ls. "Fit1ishiflg 6flerlltiefl" mea!ls these aeWiities iii ohieh 11 finisltiHg m11teriftl is epplietl te 11 sttbstrftte llfltt is sttbset)tlefltl) 11il' tlrietl; e1:11etl in llfl 6•eH,Bre1:11etlb) fllttillti6fl. "LB" g16SS e611liflg" mellltS II eefttiflgV>itieh eiffiibi!s flgl6SS re11tling lesslhllfl ereqtt11I te 25 en 11 6G degreegl6ss1Heter. ] "Metallic/Iridescent color coating" means a coating which contains iridescent particles, composed of either metal as metallic particles or silicon as mica particles, in excess of0.042 pounds per gallon as applied, where suchparticles arevisible inthedried film. "Multi-color[etl] coating" means a coating which exhibits
more than one colorwhen applied, and which is packaged in a single containerand applied in asingle coat. "Non[-]-(-]enclosed paint gun cleaner" means cleaner consistingofabasin similarto asinkin which the operatorwashes the outside ofthe gun under a solvent stream. The gun cup is filled with recirculated solvent, the gun tip is placed into acanisterattached to the basin, and suction draws the solvent from the cup through the gun. The solvent gravitates to the bottom ofthe basin and drains through a small hole to a reservoir that supplies solvent to the recirculation pump. "Pretreatment coating" means a coating which contains no more that 16% solids, by weight, and at least 0.5% acid, by weight, is used to provide surface etching, and is applied directly to bare metal surfaces to provide corrosion resistance and promote adhesion for subsequentcoatings. "Primer" means any coatingwhich is labeled and formulated for application to a substrate to provide abond between the substrate and subsequentcoats; corrosion resistance; asmooth substrate surface;
or resistance to penetration of subsequent coats, and on which a subsequentcoating is applied. Primers may bepigmented. "Single-stage coating" means any pigmented coating, excluding primers and multi-colorcoatings, labeled and formulated for

UTAHSTATEBULLETIN,January 

### OJ, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. IDARFile No. 36736

application without a subsequent clear coat. Single-stage coatings include single-stage metallidiridescentcoatings. "Solids" means the partofthe coating thatremains afterthe coating is dried or cured; solids content is determined using data from EPAMethod 24. [ "Speeittley e!llltiflgs" lfteflfts !laHesillH fJl'!llft!lters, Ill" gi!lss e!l!ltiHgs, arightlftetttl 

### t:r'ifl'! !'efl!IW e!llltiflgs,jllftl'3iHg (ettt iH) elel!l'e!l!lts, el!!St!lmefie e!llltiflgs, i!ftfJlltlt l'tlsistflftt e!llltiflgs, l!Hdeffi!ltly e!llltiHgs, tlftiffll'lftHHish: aleHtlets, flfl:B

.. ·eltl thl'!lttghfJA!ftel'S. ] "Temporary protective coating" means any coating which is labeled and formulated for the purpose oftemporarily protecting areas form oversprayormechanical damage. "Topcoat" means any coating or series ofcoatings applied
over a primer or an existing finish for the purpose ofprotection or beautification. "Truck bed liner coating" means any coating, excluding clear, color, multi-color, and single-stage coatings, labeled and formulated for application to a truck bed to protect it from surface abrasion. "Underbody coating" means any coating labeled and formulated for application to wheel wells. the inside ofdoorpanels or fenders, the underside ofatrunkorhood, orthe underside ofthe motor vehicle. "Uniform finish coating" means any coating labeled and formulated for application to the area around a spot repair for the purpose ofblending a repaired area's color or clear coat to match the appearance ofan adjacent area's existingcoating. PriortoMay I,2013, this coating category maybe referredto as uniform finish blenders. "Uniform finish blender" means acoating designed to blend
arepaired topcoatinto anexistingtopcoat.
R307-354-4. Emission Standards. Each owneroroperatorshall notapply coatings with aVOC content in excess ofthe amounts specified in Table I or shall use an add-on control device as specifiedin R307-354-6.

TABLE 1
AUTOMOTIVE REFINISHING voe LIMITS (values in pounds of voe per gallon of coating, minus water....!!l!!. exempt solvent (compounds not defined as VOC), as applied)

COATING CATEGORY voe EMISSION RATES
Adhesion Promoter 4.5
Clear Coating 2.1
Color Coating 3.5
Multi-color Coating 5.7

Pretreatment Coating 5.5
Primer 2.1
Primer Sealer 2.1 Single-stage Coating 2.B Temporary Protective Coating 0.5
Truck Bed Liner Coating 2.6 Underbody Coating 3.6

UTAHSTATEBULLETIN,January OJ, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. I NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES

Uniform Finish Coating 4.5 Any Other Coating Type 2.1
R307-354-5. WorkPracticeandRecordkeeping. (I) Control techniques and work practices are to be implemented at all times to reduce

## voe emissions from fugitive type sources. Control techniques andworkpractices include: (a) Tightfitting covers for opentanks; (b) Covered containers for solventwiping cloths; (c) Collection hoods for areas where solvent is used for cleanup; (d) Minimizing spill ofVOC-containing cleaningmaterials; (e) ConveyingVOC-containing materials from one location to anotherin closed containers orpipes;J!llii (f) Cleaning spray guns in enclosed systems or a nonenclosed paint gun cleaner may be used ifthe vapor pressure ofthe cleaning solvent is less than 100mm Hg at 68 degrees Fahrenheit and the solventis directedtowards adrain thatleads directly to an enclosed remote**reservoirj~** (g) UsiHgree)eled s!lheHts fer e!eMiflg. (2) The !lWHer !lr !lflerllt!lr sk!!!I lfttHHttHH ree!lrtls lfelft lhe lftflftttfitetttrer !h!lttlelftllHStrllte e!llftfJli11Hee ,;itk !he emissillH stl!Hd!ll't!s !lfR3!:l7 3:S4 4.] ([3]2) Application equipmentrequirements: (a) A person shall not apply any coating to an automotive part or component unless the coating application method achieves a demonstrated 65%transferefficiency. (b) The following coating application methods have been demonstrated to achieve aminimum of65%transferefficiency: (i) Brush, dip orroll coatingoperated in accordancewith the manufacturers specifications; (ii) Electrostatic application equipment operated in accordancewith the manufacturers specifications; and (iii) High Volume. Low Pressure spray equipment operated in accordancewith the manufacturers specifications. (c) Other coating application methods may be used that have been demonstrated to be capable of achieving at least 65% transferefficiency, as certifiedby themanufacturer. (3) All sources subiect to R307-354 shall maintain records demonstrating compliance with all provisions of R307-354 on 

### an annual basis. (al Records shall include. but not 

### be limited to. inventory and product data sheets ofall coatings and solvents subject to R307- lli, (bl These records shall be available to the director upon

R307-354-6. OptionalAdd-On Controls. (I) The owner or operator may install and maintain an incinerator, carbon adsorption, or any other add-on emission control device, provided that the emission control device will attain at least 90%efficiency performance. (2) The owneror operator ofacontrol device shall provide [eertiHellti!lH tt!llft lhe mltHttf!letttrer]docwnentation that the emission control system will attain the requirements of R307-354-6[retttffretieilieieHeyperferlftl!Hee]. (3) Emission control systems shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer recommendations.

81NOTICES OF CHANGES IN PROPOSED RULES

The owner or operator shall maintain for a minimum oftwo years records ofoperating and maintenance sufficientto demonstrate that the equipment is being operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturerrecommendations.

R307-354-7. Compliance Schedule. All sources within Box Elder, Cache, Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele, Utah, and Weber counties shall be 

### in compliance with this rule by [Jflfltlft1' l,]h!Jti.2014.

KEY: airpollution, automotiverefinishing,VOC, coatings Date ofEnactmentorLastSubstantiveAmendment: 

### (*H).20.U Authorizing,and Implemented orInterpretedLaw: 19-2-104(l)(a)


# Environmental Quality, Air Quality 

# R307-355 Co trol of Emissions from Aerosp ce

Ma ufacture and Rework Facir 1es

E OF CHANGE IN PROPOSED DAR FILE NO.: 36737

FILED: 12/10/2012
RULE ANALYSIS PURPOSE OF E RULE OR RE CHANGE: During t public comment eriod, both industry and EPA submitted c mments that re ulted in the need to make substantive chan s. These co ments were regarding changing the rule appli bility to b in line with the CTG; including certain exemptio s that 

### w. re included in the model rule; adding a voe con nt 

## r it for solvent cleaning; changing the add-on control ffi ency to be in line with what is in the CTG; more clearly ming the acceptable solvent application methods; adding re definitions to clarify rule requirements; and ch gi the record-keeping requirements.
SUMMARY OF The rule applicability in Section 307-355-2 h been changed from sources with the pote 1al to emit 5 tons er year ofVOCs to sources with the pot tial to emit 10 ton per year ofvoes. The rule has been anged in Section R3 -355-3 by adding rule exemptions o manufacturing or re ork operations involving space v hicles and to rework opera ·ons performed on antique aero ace vehicles or components. efinitions for "antique aeros ace vehicle or component," "ch ical milling maskants," xempt solvents," "general aviat1 n rework facility," "lo vapor pressure hydrocarbon-base cleaning solvent,"" ace vehicle," and "specialty coating" are dded to Section 07-355-4. New emission standards are a ded in Section 307-355-5 for coatings that are delivered to a coatin applicator that applies Type I chemical m ling mask nt and Type II maskants. Language is also adde to Sec· n R307-355-5 to clarify that exempt solvents are n t inc ded in the voe content limits for the the coatings used.



### 82 DAR File No. 36736



### New application methods are added to Section R307-355

.

ection R307-355-7 is changed to require owners nd o erators to maintain records demonstrating compliance ith th rule on an annual basis and to require them to ake tho e records available to the director upon request. veral solv nt cleaning exemptions are added to Section R3 -355- 8. S ion R307-355-9 is changed to clarify that the operat r must provide documentation that the m1ss1on control ystem will meet the requirements of Se on R307- 355-9. AR NOTE: This change in proposed rul has been filed to m ke additional changes to a proposed w rule that was publis ed in the October 1, 2012, issue oft e Utah State Bulletin, on age 91. Underlining in the rule b low indicates text that h been added since the pub cation of the proposed rul mentioned above; strike-out i icates text that has been del ed. You must view the ch ge in proposed rule and the pr osed new rule together t understand all of the changes tha will be enforceable shoul the agency make this rule effective.
STATUTORY OR C NSTITUTIONAL THIS RULE: Subse ion 19-2-104(1)(

COMPLIANCE CO TS FOR AFFECT D PERSONS: The compliance costs or affected persons "ll be reduced as there were sever I exemptions added to he proposed rule. However, these savings are difficult to etermine as the exemptions do ot applyto all sources. COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT H FISCAL IMP CT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON The compli nee costs for affected persons will b reduced as there wer several exemptions added to the pr osed rule. However, these savings are difficult to determ e as the exempti s do not applyto all sources.
LL TEXT OF THIS RULE MAY BE INSP G REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS, AT:

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY FOURTH FLOOR 195 N 1950W



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, January 

### OJ, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. I

# UTAH STATE BULLETIN

OFFICIALNOTICES OF UTAH STATE GOVERNMENT Filed January 16, 2013, 12:00 a.m. through February

## OJ, 2013, 11:59 p.m.

Number2013-4 February 15, 2013

NancyL. Lancaster, Editor KennethA. 

### Hansen, Director Kimberly K. Hood, Executive Director

The 

## Utah State Bulletin (Bulletin) is an official noticing publication ofthe executive branch of Utah State Government. The Department ofAdministrative Services, Division ofAdministrative Rules produces the

## Bulletin under authority ofSection 63G-3-402. Inquiries concerning the substance or applicability ofan administrative rule that appears in the 

## Bulletin should be addressed to the contact person for the rule. Questions about the 

## Bulletin or the rulemaking process may be addressed to: Division ofAdministrative Rules, PO Box 141007, SaltLake City, Utah 84114-1007, telephone 801-538-3764. Additional rulemaking information, and electronic versions ofall administrative rule publications are available at: http://www.rules.utah.gov/

The information in this 

## Bulletin is summarized in the 

## Utah State Digest (Digest). The

## Digest is available by E-mail or over the Internet. Visit http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/digest.htm for additional information.Division ofAdministrative Rules, Salt Lake City 84114

Unless otherwise noted, all infonnation presented in this publication is in the public domain and maybe reproduced, reprinted, and redistributed as desired. Materials incorporatedby referenceretain the copyrightasserted by theirrespective authors. Citationto the source is requested.

Utah state bulletin. Semimonthly. I. Delegated legislation--Utah-Periodicals. 2. Administrative procedure-Utah-Periodicals. I. Utah. Office ofAdministrative Rules.

KFU440.A73S7 348.792'025-DDC 85-643197

## TABLE OF CONTENTS

SPECIAL NOTICES

.........................................................................................................................................................................1 Health Health Care Financing, Coverage and Reimbursement Policy Notice for March 2013 Medicaid Rate Changes

........................................................................................................1
EXECUTIVE DOCUMENTS

.............................................................................................................................................................3 Governor Administration Governor's Executive Order E0/001/2013: Declaring A Liquid Petroleum Emergency

............................................3
NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

.................................................................................................................................................5 Agriculture and Food Animal Industry No. 37248 (Repeal and Reenact): R58-6 Poultry

......................................................................................................6 No. 37246 (Amendment): R58-18 Elk Farming

........................................................................................................12 No. 37247 (Amendment): R58-19 Compliance Procedures

.....................................................................................13 Governor Economic Development No. 37208 (Amendment): R357-6 Technology and Life Science Economic Development

and Related Tax Credits

.........................................................................................................................................15 No. 37207 (Amendment): R357-9 Alternative Energy DevelopmentTax lncentives

................................................16 Health Family Health and Preparedness, Licensing No. 37209 (Amendment): R432-3 General Health Care Facility Rules Inspection and

Enforcement.

..........................................................................................................................................................17 Human Services Aging and Adult Services No. 37228 (Amendment): R510-104-11 Liquid Meals

..............................................................................................18 Recovery Services No. 37229 (Amendment): R5i27-38 Unenforceable Cases

......................................................................................20 Services for People with Disabilities No. 37245 (Amendment): R539-1-3 Definitions

.......................................................................................................21 Natural Resources Parks and Recreation No. 37242 (Amendment): R651-224 Towed Devices

...............................................................................................22 Wildlife Resources No. 37225 (Amendment): R657-12 Hunting and FishingAccommodations for People with Disabilities

.......................................................................................................................................................24 No. 37233 (Amendment): R657-20 Falconry

...........................................................................................................26 Public Safety Criminal Investigations and Technical Services, Criminal Identification No. 37232 (New Rule): R722-360 Certificate of Removal from the Sex Offender and Kidnap

Offender Registry

...................................................................................................................................................46 Workforce Services Unemployment Insurance No. 37238 (Amendment): R994-406-301 Claimant Fault..

.......................................................................................48
FIVE-YEAR NOTICES OF REVIEWAND STATEMENTS OF CONTINUATION

...........................................................................51 Environmental Quality Water Quality No. 37239: R317-9Administrative Procedures

........................................................................................................51 No. 37240: R317-13Approvals and Permits for a Water Reuse Project...

...............................................................51 No. 37241: R317-14Approval in Change in Point of Discharge ofPOTW

..............................................................52



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, February 15, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. 4

### TABLE OF CONTENTS

Health Health Care Financing, Coverage and Reimbursement Policy No. 37221: R414-301 Medicaid General Provisions

................................................................................................52 No. 37215: R414-302 Eligibility Requirements

........................................................................................................53 No. 37216: R414-303 Coverage Groups

.................................................................................................................53 No. 37217: R414-304 Income and Budgeting

..........................................................................................................54 No. 37222: R414-305 Resources

.............................................................................................................................54 No. 37218: R414-306 Program Benefits and Date of Eligibility

...............................................................................55 No. 37223: R414-308Application, Eligibility Determinations and Improper Medical Assistance

..............................................................................................................................................................55 Human Services SubstanceAbuse and Mental Health, State Hospital No. 37211: R525-2 Patient Rights

............................................................................................................................56 No. 37224: R525-3 Medication Treatment of Patients

.............................................................................................56 No. 37210: R525-4 Visitors

......................................................................................................................................57 No. 37214: R525-5 Background Checks

..................................................................................................................57 No. 37212: R525-6 Prohibited Items and Devices

...................................................................................................58 No. 37213: R525-7 Complaints/Suggestions/Concerns

...........................................................................................58 Recovery Services No. 37231: R527-302 Income Withholding Fees

.....................................................................................................59 Natural Resources Administration No. 37219: R634-1 Americans With Disabilities Complaint Procedure

....................................................................59 Professional PracticesAdvisory Commission Administration No. 37243: R686-100 Professional PracticesAdvisory Commission, Rules of Procedure:

Complaints and Hearings

.......................................................................................................................................60 Public Safety Criminal Investigations and Technical Services, Criminal Identification No. 37226: R722-320 Undercover Identification

......................................................................................................61
NOTICES FIVE-YEAR REVIEW EXTENSION

...............................................................................................................................63 Governor Economic Development No. 37206: R357-2 Rural Broadband Service Fund

................................................................................................63
NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES

.....................................................................................................................................65

RULES INDEX BYAGENCY (CODE NUMBER) AND BY KEYWORD (SUBJECT)

...........................................................................................................................................................69

ii 

### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, February 15, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. 4

### NOTICES OF 

# RULE EFFECTIVE DATES

State law provides for agencies to make their rules effective and enforceable after publication in the Utah State Bulletin. In the case of Proposed Rules or Changes in Proposed Rules with a designated comment period, the law permits an agency to file a notice ofeffective date any time afterthe close ofcomment plus seven days. In the case of Changes in Proposed Rules with no designated comment period, the law permits an agency to file a notice of effective date on any date including or afterthe thirtieth day after the rule's publication date. Ifan agency fails to file a Notice of Effective Date within 120 days from the publication ofa Proposed Rule or a related Change in Proposed Rule the rule lapses and the agency must startthe rulemaking process over.
Notices of Effective Date are governed by Subsection 63G-3-301 (12), 63G-3-303, and Sections R15-4-Sa and Sb.

Abbreviations AMO=Amendment CPR = Change in Proposed Rule NEW= New Rule R&R = Repeal & Reenact REP= Repeal Agriculture and Food Regulatory Services No. 37027 (AMO): R70-310. GradeA Pasteurized Milk Published: 12/01/2012 Effective: 01/29/2013
No. 36915 (AMO): R70-320-18. Transport Tanks, Operators Published: 11/01/2012 Effective: 01/29/2013
No. 36914 (AMO): R70-330. Raw Milk for Retail Published 11/01/2012 Effective: 01/29/2013

Commerce Occupational and Professional Licensing No. 37073 (AMO): R156-3a-102. Definitions Published: 12/15/2012 Effective: 01/24/2013
No. 37074 (AMO): R156-22. Professional Engineers and Professional Land Surveyors Licensing Act Rule Published: 12/15/2012 Effective: 01/24/2013
No. 37071 (AMO): R156-44a. Nurse Midwife PracticeAct Rules Published: 12/15/2012 Effective: 01/22/2013

Environmental Quality Administration No. 36554 (REP): R305-6. Administrative Procedures Published: 08/15/2012 Effective: 01/31/2013



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, February 15, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. 4 No. 36554 (CPR): R305-6. Administrative Procedures Published: 01/01/2013 Effective: 01/31/2013
No. 36553 (NEW): R305-7. Administrative Procedures Published: 08/15/2012 Effective: 01/31/2013
No. 36553 (CPR): R305-7. Administrative Procedures Published: 01/01/2013 Effective: 01/31/2013
Air Quality No. 36723 (AMO): R307-101-2. Definitions Published: 10/01/2012 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36723 (CPR): R307-101-2. Definitions Published: 01/01/2013 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36741 (AMO): R307-307. Davis, Salt Lake, and Utah Counties: Road Salting and Sanding Published: 10/01/2012 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36741 (CPR): R307-307. Davis, Salt Lake, and Utah Counties: Road Salting and Sanding Published: 01/01/2013 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36740 (NEW): R307-312. Aggregate Processing Operations for PM2.5 NonattainmentAreas Published: 10/01/2012 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36740 (CPR): R307-312. Aggregate Processing Operations for PM2.5 NonattainmentAreas Published: 01/01/2013 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36725 (REP): R307-340. Ozone Nonattainment and MaintenanceAreas: Surface Coating Processes Published: 10/01/2012 Effective: 02/01/2013



### 65

### NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES

No. 36725 (CPR): R307-340. Ozone Nonattainment and MaintenanceAreas: Surface Coating Processes Published: 01/01/2013 Effective: 02/01/2013 

## r--.

No. 36726 (NEW): R307-344. Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings Published: 10/01/2012 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36726 (CPR): R307-344. Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings Published: 01/01/2013 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36727 (NEW): R307-345. Fabric and Vinyl Coatings Published: 10/0112012 Effective: 02/0112013
No. 36727 (CPR): R307-345. Fabric and Vinyl Coatings Published: 01/01/2013 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36728 (NEW): R307-346. Metal Furniture Surface Coatings Published: 10/01/2012 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36728 (CPR): R307-346. Metal Furniture Surface Coatings Published: 01/01/2013 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36729 (NEW): R307-347. LargeAppliance Surface Coatings Published: 10/01/2012 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36729 (CPR): R307-347. Large Appliance Surface Coatings Published: 01/01/2013 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36730 (NEW): R307-348. MagnetWire Coatings Published: 10/01/2012 Effective: 02/0112013
No. 36730 (CPR): R307-348. MagnetWire Coatings Published: 01/01/2013 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36731 (NEW): R307-349. FlatWood Panel Coatings Published: 10/01/2012 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36731 (CPR): R307-349. FlatWood Panel Coatings Published: 01/01/2013 Effective: 02/0112013



### 66 No. 36732 (NEW): R307-350. Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Coatings Published: 10/01/2012 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36732 (CPR): R307-350. Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Coatings Published: 01/01/2013 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36733 (NEW): R307-351. GraphicArts Published: 10/01/2012 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36733 (CPR): R307-351. GraphicArts Published: 01/01/2013 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36734 (NEW): R307-352. Metal Container, Closure, and Coil Coatings Published: 10/01/2012 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36734 (CPR): R307-352. Metal Container, Closure, and Coil Coatings Published: 01/01/2013 Effective: 02/0112013
No. 36736 (NEW): R307-354. Automotive Refinishing Coatings Published: 10/01/2012 Effective: 02/0112013
No. 36736 (CPR): R307-354. Automotive Refinishing Coatings Published: 01/01/2013 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36737 (NEW): R307-355. Control of Emissions from Aerospace Manufacture and Rework Facilities Published: 10/0112012 Effective: 02/01/2013
No. 36737 (CPR): R307-355. Control of Emissions from Aerospace Manufacture and Rework Facilities Published: 01/01/2013 Effective: 02/01/2013 Drinking Water No. 36562 (AMO): R309-515-6. Ground Water

- Wells Published: 08/15/2012 Effective: 01/16/2013
No. 36562 (CPR): R309-515-6. Ground Water

- Wells Published: 12/01/2012 Effective: 01/16/2013



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, February 15, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. 4Insurance Administration No. 37018 (AMO): R590-102. Insurance Department Fee Payment Rule Published: 11/15/2012 Effective: 01/18/2013
No. 36846 (AMO): R590-171. Surplus Lines Procedures Rule Published: 10/15/2012 Effective: 01/22/2013
No. 36846 (CPR): R590-171. Surplus Lines Procedures Rule Published: 12/15/2012 Effective: 01/22/2013 

### NOTICES OF RULE EFFECTIVE DATES

Natural Resources Oil, Gas and Mining; Oil and Gas No. 36992 (AMO): R649-3-38. Surface Owner Protection Act Provisions Published: 11/15/2012 Effective: 01/23/2013
Wildlife Resources No. 37069 (AMO): R657-13. Taking Fish and Crayfish Published: 12/15/2012 Effective: 01/22/2013

End ofthe Notices of Rule Effective Dates Section



### UTAHSTATEBULLETIN, February 15, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. 4 

### 67