alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Solo Cup Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the thirteen weeks ended March 27, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert M. Korzenski, as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert M. KorzenskiRobert M. KorzenskiChief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)May 10, 2011


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.


A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

SISVEL INTERNATIONAL S.A.,

Appellant

v.

SIERRA WIRELESS, INC., TELIT CINTERION 

DEUTSCHLAND GMBH,

Appellees

______________________ 

2022-1494

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-

01102.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

ROBERT J. GAJARSA, Devlin Law Firm LLC, Wilmington, DE, argued for appellant. Also represented by NEIL A.

BENCHELL, TIMOTHY DEVLIN, NADIIA LOIZIDES. 

 GUY YONAY, Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz LLP, 

New York, NY, argued for all appellees. Appellee Telit Cinterion Deutschland GmbH Also represented by KYLE 

AUTERI, I. 

Case: 22-1494 Document: 63 Page: 1 Filed: 05/11/2023
 AMANDA TESSAR, Perkins Coie LLP, Denver, CO, for appellee Sierra Wireless, Inc. Also represented by DANIEL 

TYLER KEESE, Portland, OR. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, HUGHES, and STARK, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

May 11, 2023 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 22-1494 Document: 63 Page: 2 Filed: 05/11/2023
CCC COMMODITY INVENTORY

As of April 30, 2020

(Million Units Except as Noted) OUTSTANDING UNDER LOAN CCC-OWNED

CY 2018 CY 2019 INVENTORY 2/

(Actual Units)

BUTTER (LB) - - 0.0

CHEESE (LB) - - 0.0

NONFAT DRY MILK (LB) - - 0.0

BARLEY (BU) 0.0 3.3 0.0

CORN (BU) 1.3 546.6 0.0

OATS (BU) 0.0 0.6 0.0

SORGHUM (BU) 0.0 1.4 0.0

SOYBEANS (BU) 0.1 105.8 0.0

WHEAT (BU) 0.1 37.8 0.0

RICE (CWT) 0.0 16.2 0.0

REFINED SUGAR (Mil. Lbs.) 45.0 636.0 0.0

 IN-PROCESS BEET 0.0 888.0 0.0

RAW CANE SUGAR (Mil. Lbs.) 0.0 1,180.8 0.0

 IN-PROCESS CANE 0.0 0.0 0.0

HONEY (Mil. Lbs.) 0.0 7.7 0.0

PEANUTS (tons) 0.0 1,244,450.0 0.00

CANOLA SEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 1,439.0 0.0

CRAMBE (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0

FLAXSEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 32.0 0.0

MUSTARD SEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 1.0 0.0

RAPESEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0

SAFFLOWER SEED (CWT) 1/ 4.0 4.0 0.0

SESAME SEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0

SUNFLOWER SEED (OIL) (CWT) 1/ 0.0 267.0 0.0

SUNFLOWER SEED (Other) (CWT) 1/ 0.0 10.0 0.0

DRY PEAS (CWT) 1/ 0.0 1,126.0 0.0

LENTILS (CWT) 1/ 52.0 161.0 0.0

CHICKPEAS (CWT) 1/ 19.0 299.0 0.0

UPLAND COTTON (BALE) 2,100.0 3,301,900.0 0.0

ELS COTTON (BALE) 0.0 282,100.0 0.0

1/ Minor Oilseeds & Pulses are in thousand units.

2/ CCC acquired 2018 Crop Year upland cotton as follows: 

15 bales from June 2019, 81 bales from July 2019, 2,996 bales from August 2019, 17,630 bales September 2019,

24,633 bales from October 2019, 7,325 bales from November 2019, 12,066 bales from December 2019, 

2,234 bales from January 2020, 58 bales from February 2020; 4,330 bales from March 2020; 

2 bales from April 2020 maturing loans. 

Following were multiple invitations that sold 8,264 bales in September; 39,325 bales in November, 

7,899 bales in December; 9,697 bales sold in January; 1,513 bales in February; 3,856 bales in March; 

822 bales in April. In total, there were 0 bales of upland cotton in inventory on April 30, 2020.

CCC also acquired 2018 Crop Year peanuts as follows: 4,559.12 tons from July 2019, 37,417.73 tons from 

August 2019, 37,845.19 tons from September 2019, 4,735.16 tons from October, 4,054.36 tons from 

November, and December 2,025.31 tons maturing loans.

Total CCC peanut forfeitures for Crop Year 2018 were 84,719.20 tons. CCC sold 340.51 tons from Invitation 

No. 8, 28,563.44 tons from Invitation No. 9, 13,052.09 tons from Invitation No. 10, 34,005.36 tons from

Invitation No. 11, 3,846.40 tons from Invitation No.12, 4,268.73 tons from Invitation No. 13, 0 tons from 

Invitation 14, 2,780.41 from Invitation 15, 1,249.44 tons from Invitation 16, 667.18 tons from Invitation 17, 

2025.31 tons from Invitation 19. 

This brought the total CCC peanut inventory to 0.00 tons as of April 30, 2020. 

Report Completed: May 15, 2020
Exhibit 32.0
 
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kearny Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John N. Hopkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date: November 9, 2010

/s/ John N. HopkinsJohn N. HopkinsChief Executive Officer




















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kearny Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William C. Ledgerwood, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




















Date: November 9, 2010

/s/ William C. LedgerwoodWilliam C. LedgerwoodExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




In
      connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
      ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
      ‘‘Report’’) by MDwerks Inc. (the ‘‘Registrant’’), I, Vincent Colangelo, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:




1.
 
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.


Dated:
                August 14, 2008
            
            /s/
                Vincent ColangeloVincent
                Colangelo
              Chief
                Financial Officer
# C_2004094EN.01006704.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/67

---

Removal from the register of Case T-213/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 94/171)

(Language of the Case: French)

(Language of the Case: French)

By order of 20 January 2004 the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case T-213/03: Francesco Contesso v Commission of the European Communities.

---

(1)  OJ C 200 of 23.08.2003.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 292 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 292

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 20 (legislative day, December 18), 2001

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
             Supporting the goals of the Year of the Rose.

Whereas the study of fossils has shown that the rose has been a native wild 
        flower in North America for over 35,000,000 years;
Whereas the rose is grown today in every State in the United States;
Whereas the rose has long been used to symbolize love, friendship, beauty, 
        peace, and the devotion of the people of the United States to their 
        Nation;
Whereas the rose has been cultivated and grown in gardens for over 5,000 years, 
        and is referred to in both the Old and New Testaments;
Whereas the rose has for many years captivated the affection of humankind and it 
        has been revered in art, music, and literature;
Whereas George Washington was a breeder of roses and one of his varieties, named 
        after his mother, is still grown today;
Whereas in 1986 the rose was designated as the national floral emblem of the 
        United States; and
Whereas the American Rose Society has designated 2002 as the Year of the Rose: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) supports the goals of the Year of the Rose; and
            (2) encourages the President to issue a proclamation 
        calling on the people of the United States to observe the year 
        with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 20, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50017 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAIME GARCIA-GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-00-CR-391-1

-------------------- August 23, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jaime Garcia-Gomez appeals the 57-month term of imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea conviction of attempting to illegally reenter the United States after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Garcia-Gomez argues that his sentence should not have exceeded the two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Garcia-Gomez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), butNo. 01-50017 -2- seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). GarciaGomez’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Administrative Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Administrative Conference of the United States.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of a public meeting of the Committee on Administration and Management of the Assembly of the Administrative Conference of the United States. The meeting will provide an opportunity for the committee to continue its consideration of a draft recommendation regarding the Paperwork Reduction Act. Complete details regarding the committee meeting, the contours of the project, how to attend (including information about remote access and obtaining special accommodations for persons with disabilities), and how to submit comments to the committee can be found in the “About” section of the Conference's Web site, at                         *http://www.acus.gov*. Click on “About,” then on “The Committees,” and then on “Committee on Administration and Management.”                    

                        Comments may be submitted by email to                         *Comments@acus.gov,*                         with “Committee on Administration and Management” in the subject line, or by postal mail to “Committee on Administration and Management Comments” at the address given below.                    

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at 1120 20th Street NW., Suite 706 South, Washington, DC 20036.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Emily Schleicher Bremer, Designated Federal Officer, Administrative Conference of the United States, 1120 20th Street NW., Suite 706 South, Washington, DC 20036; Telephone 202-480-2080.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Committee on Administration and Management

The Committee on Administration and Management will meet to continue its consideration of a draft recommendation on the Paperwork Reduction Act and proposed improvements to its implementation.

*Date:*                     Wednesday, May 2, 2012 from 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.                

Dated: April 3, 2012.

Shawne C. McGibbon,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2012-8369 Filed 4-5-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6110-01-P
# C_2004094EN.01003307.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/33

---

Removal from the register of Case C-459/01 (1)

1

(2004/C 94/80)

By order of 27 January 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case C-459/01: Commission of the European Communities v Ireland.

---

(1)  OJ C 84 of 6.4.2002.

1

---
U. S. Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF COTTON

FOR RELEASE AT 1:00 P.M. CT December 5, 2019

USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of Cotton. The cotton bales were sold under 

Invitation 2020U0008 dated December 4, 2019.

Invitation 2020U0008

Catalog Lot No. Catalog Location Purchaser Pounds 

Sold 

Price Sold (per 

Pound) CCC Revenue 

1 LIBERAL, KS Brighann Marketing Inc 481 0.3004 $ 144.49 

2 LIBERAL, KS Brighann Marketing Inc 478 0.3004 $ 143.59 

3 LIBERAL, KS Brighann Marketing Inc 480 0.3004 $ 144.19 

14 CORPUS CHRISTI, 

TX Brighann Marketing Inc 485 0.3004 $ 145.69 

16 CORPUS CHRISTI, 

TX Brighann Marketing Inc 83,663 0.4104 $ 34,335.30 

19 CORPUS CHRISTI, 

TX ALLENBERG COTTON CO. 22,331 0.4795 $ 10,707.71 

20 CORPUS CHRISTI, 

TX ALLENBERG COTTON CO. 121,300 0.5295 $ 64,228.35 

21 CORPUS CHRISTI, 

TX ALLENBERG COTTON CO. 49,018 0.5115 $ 25,072.71 

29 EL CAMPO, TX ALLENBERG COTTON CO. 122,556 0.541 $ 66,302.80 

30 EL CAMPO, TX ALLENBERG COTTON CO. 78,238 0.542 $ 42,405.00 

31 EL CAMPO, TX ALLENBERG COTTON CO. 22,159 0.6 $ 13,295.40 

34 TAYLOR, TX Brighann Marketing Inc 467 0.3004 $ 140.29 

36 TAYLOR, TX Brighann Marketing Inc 7,148 0.3004 $ 2,147.26 

38 TAYLOR, TX Brighann Marketing Inc 2,448 0.3004 $ 735.38 

511,252 $ 259,948.15
### FW: Updates on Veolia Permitting Action Updates on Veolia Permitting Action Elizabeth J Elizabeth J .

. Hubertz Hubertz Hubertz to: Andrea Morgan 12/19/2012 01:53 PM Cc: Damico.Genevieve, David Ogulei

Hi Andrea -- we have been working with Kathy Andria in connection with Veolia .
Could you please add me (ejhubertz@wulaw.wustl.edu) and our environmental scientist Ken Miller (kmiller@wulaw.wustl.edu) to the email list of people you notify when the comment period for the Veolia reopened permit begins or when you have any other updates on the matter ?

Thank you very much and have a great holiday season!

Liz

Elizabeth J. Hubertz Clinic Attorney Interdisciplinary Environmental Clinic Washington University School of Law Campus Box 1120 St. Louis, MO 63130 Phone: 314.935.8760 Fax: 314.935.5171 Email: ejhubertz@wulaw.wustl.edu

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Morgan. Andrea @epamail.epa.gov Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:56:27 -0600 Subject: Updates on Veolia Permitting Action To: Kathy Andria <kathyandria@gmail.com>, Amy Funk <amyfunk@illinois.edu>, Verena Owen <baumling@aol.com>, David Bender <bender@mwbattorneys.com>, Samantha Ballard <breaking.reality@gmail.com>, Kat Logan Smith <klogansmith@moenviron.org> Cc: Ogulei.David@epamail.epa.gov, Damico.Genevieve@epamail.epa.gov, Woolums.Jane@epamail.epa.gov

Everyone,

I hope the season is finding you well. We wanted to provide you all with a few updates on the permitting action pertaining to Veolia Environmental Services. Veolia has withdrawn their application to modify their Title V permit. EPA plans to continue to reopen Veolia's Title V permit under 40 C.F.R. § 71.7(f) to incorporate feedrate limits. We expect to public notice the draft permit in early 2013 and will notify you all by email when the comment period begins.Thank you
,

Andrea Morgan Environmental Engineer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 | Air & Radiation Division Phone: (312) 353-6058 | Fax: (312) 692-2920
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WILLIE J. CAUSEY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Trustee for Lehman Brothers-Structured Asset Investment Loan Trust Sail 2006-BNC3, Defendant - Appellee. No. 10-56021 D.C. No. 2:08-cv-03460-JHN-CW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Jacqueline H. Nguyen, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted December 7, 2011 Pasadena, California Before: B. FLETCHER, SILVERMAN, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges. Willie J. Causey, Jr. appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for defendant U.S. Bank National Associa tion on his Truth in Lending Act claim to rescind his mortgage refinancing loan with the defendant. Reviewing de novo, we 

# FILED

DEC 29 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS- 2 - reverse and remand. See Blue Lake Rancheria v. United States , 653 F.3d 1112, 1115 (9th Cir. 2011). It is undisputed that the plaintiff effectively invoked his absolute right to rescind the transaction within three business days of the loan closing. It is also undisputed that the lender ignored the plai ntiff’s rescission notice and proceeded to fund the loan. The district court erred in ruling that the plaintiff was required to tender the borrowed funds to the defendant before the defendant was obligated to release its lien. In an uncontested resci ssion as here, the default sequence under the Act requires the creditor to release its lie n before the consumer must tender. See 15 U.S.C. § 1635(b); 12 C.F.R. § 226.23(d)(2)–(3). Although the district court is authorized to modify the default sequence, that authority ends once rescission is accomplished. 15 U.S.C. § 1635(b); 12 C.F.R. § 226.23(d)(4). In a case where the cred itor disputes the consumer’s asserted ground for rescission, rescission is not accomplished until a court determines that the consumer had the right to rescind. See Yamamoto v. Bank of N.Y. , 329 F.3d 1167, 1172 (9th Cir. 2003). But in a case where the creditor acquiesces in the consumer’s notice of rescission or fails to respond within the 20-day response period, rescission is accomplished automatically. See id.- 3 - Here, the undisputed facts show that the plaintiff timely mailed his rescission notice, and the defendant faile d to dispute it within 20 days — thus accomplishing rescission automatically a nd triggering the default sequence under the regulations. On remand, the district court should order that the defendant release its lien on the plaintiff’s home and determine the amount that the plaintiff must then tender to the defendant. Also, the plaintiff ma y present evidence to support his assertion that he attempted to tender in 2006 but the defendant did not timely take possession of the tender he offered. REVERSED AND REMANDED.