22520 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

Docket: For access to the docket to 

read background documents or 

comments received, go to the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Ziegler, Director, Division of 

Regulations, Legislation, and 

Interpretation, Wage and Hour Division, 

U.S. Department of Labor, Room S– 

3510, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20210; telephone: (202) 

693–0406 (this is not a toll free number). 

Copies of this notice of proposed 

rulemaking may be obtained in 

alternative formats (Large Print, Braille, 

Audio Tape, or Disc), upon request, by 

calling (202) 693–0675. TTY/TDD 

callers may dial toll-free (877) 889–5627 

to obtain information or request 

materials in alternative formats. 

Questions of interpretation and/or 

enforcement of regulations issued by 

this agency or referenced in this 

document may be directed to the nearest 

Wage and Hour Division District Office. 

Locate the nearest office by calling the 

Wage and Hour Division’s toll-free help 

line at (866) 4US–WAGE ((866) 487– 

9243) between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. in your 

local time zone, or log onto the Wage 

and Hour Division’s Web site for a 

nationwide listing of Wage and Hour 

District and Area Offices at: http:// 

www.dol.gov/whd/america2.htm. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Electronic Access and Filing 

Comments 

Public Participation: This notice of 

proposed rulemaking is available 

through the Federal Register and the 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site. 

You may also access this document via 

the Department’s Web site at http:// 

www.dol.gov/whd/. To comment 

electronically on federal rulemakings, 

go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at 

http://www.regulations.gov, which will 

allow you to find, review, and submit 

comments on federal documents that are 

open for comment and published in the 

Federal Register. Please identify all 

comments submitted in electronic form 

by the RIN docket number (1235– 

AA03). Because of delays in receiving 

mail in the Washington, DC area, 

commenters should transmit their 

comments electronically via the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, or submit them by 

mail early to ensure timely receipt prior 

to the close of the comment period. 

Submit one copy of your comments by 

only one method. 

II. Request for Comment 

The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

(NPRM) proposes revisions to the 

Family and Medical Act (FMLA) 

regulations to implement amendments 

to the military leave provisions of the 

FMLA made by the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, 

which extends the availability of FMLA 

leave to family members of members of 

the Regular Armed Forces for qualifying 

exigencies arising out of the 

servicmember’s deployment; defines 

those deployments covered under these 

provisions; and extends FMLA military 

caregiver leave to family members of 

certain veterans with serious injuries or 

illnesses. The NPRM also proposes to 

amend the regulations to implement the 

Airline Flight Crew Technical 

Corrections Act, which established new 

FMLA leave eligibility requirements for 

airline flight crewmembers and flight 

attendants. In addition, the proposal 

includes changes concerning the 

calculation of leave; reorganization of 

certain sections to enhance clarity; the 

removal of the forms from the 

regulations; and technical corrections of 

inadvertent drafting errors in the current 

regulations. The NPRM, complete with 

background information, economic 

impact analyses and proposed 

regulatory text, was published in the 

Federal Register on February 15, 2012 

(77 FR 8960) requesting public 

comments on the proposed revisions to 

the regulations. Interested parties were 

requested to submit comments on or 

before April 16, 2012. 

The Department has received requests 

to extend the period for filing public 

comments from various organizations. 

Because of the interest that has been 

expressed in this matter, the Department 

has decided to provide an additional 

extension of the period for submitting 

public comment until April 30, 2012. 

Dated: April 11, 2012. 

Nancy J. Leppink, 

Deputy Administrator, Wage and Hour 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9084 Filed 4–13–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–27–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 117 

[Docket No. USCG–2011–0926] 

RIN 1625–AA09 

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; 

Lafourche Bayou, LA 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes 

changing the regulation governing six 

bridges across Bayou Lafourche, south 

of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 

(GIWW). Currently, these bridges 

remain closed to navigation at various 

times on weekdays during the school 

year. The Louisiana Department of 

Transportation and Development 

(LADOTD), in conjunction with the 

Lafourche Parish Council, would like to 

change the beginning date of the 

regulation to coincide with the change 

in the beginning of the school year. All 

other aspects of the regulation will 

remain the same. These changes will 

alleviate any confusion that the bridge 

tenders and mariners may have as to the 

bridge schedule now that the school 

year begins earlier than the regulation 

effective date. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must reach the Coast Guard on or before 

May 16, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2011–0926 using any one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 

5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these four methods. See the 

‘‘Public Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, call or 

email Mr. Jim Wetherington; Bridge 


emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules 22521 

Administration Branch, Eighth Coast 

Guard District; telephone 504–671– 

2128, email 

james.r.wetherington@uscg.mil. If you 

have questions on viewing the docket, 

call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, 

Docket Operations, telephone 202–366– 

9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted, 

without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2011–0926), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online (http:// 

www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online via http:// 

www.regulations.gov, it will be 

considered received by the Coast Guard 

when you successfully transmit the 

comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or 

mail your comment, it will be 

considered as having been received by 

the Coast Guard when it is received at 

the Docket Management Facility. We 

recommend that you include your name 

and a mailing address, an email address, 

or a phone number in the body of your 

document so that we can contact you if 

we have questions regarding your 

submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will 

then become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu 

select ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ and insert 

‘‘USCG–2011–0926’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’ 

box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the 

balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. 

If you submit your comments by mail or 

hand delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit them by 

mail and would like to know that they 

reached the Facility, please enclose a 

stamped, self-addressed postcard or 

envelope. We will consider all 

comments and material received during 

the comment period and may change 

the rule based on your comments. 

Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then 

become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2011– 

0926’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the 

‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’ 

column. You may also visit the Docket 

Management Facility in Room W12–140 

on the ground floor of the Department 

of Transportation West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. We have an agreement with 

the Department of Transportation to use 

the Docket Management Facility. 

Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 

Public Meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting. But you may submit a request 

for one to the docket using one of the 

four methods specified under 

ADDRESSES. Please explain why one 

would be beneficial. If we determine 

that one would aid this rulemaking, we 

will hold one at a time and place 

announced by a later notice in the 

Federal Register. 

Basis and Purpose 

The six draw bridges across Lafourche 

Bayou that are affected by this proposed 

rule are described as follows: 

The SR 308 (Golden Meadow) Bridge, 

mile 23.9, at Golden Meadow; the 

Galliano Pontoon Bridge, mile 27.8, at 

Galliano; the SR 308 (South Lafourche 

(Tarpon)) Bridge, mile 30.6, at Galliano; 

the Cote Blanche Pontoon Bridge, mile 

33.9, at Cutoff; the Cutoff Vertical Lift 

Bridge, mile 36.3, at Cutoff; and the SR 

310 (Larose Pontoon) Bridge, mile 39.1, 

at Larose. 

The purpose of the underlying 

regulation is to implement a specific 

operating schedule that is effective only 

during the school year to accommodate 

the change in bridge traffic during the 

school year. Beginning in 2011, the 

school year started a full week before 

the regulation’s current yearly start date 

and multiple complaints were received 

by the parish about the vessel traffic 

holding up the peak-time vehicle traffic. 

Vessel traffic in the area is accustomed 

to the restrictions effective during the 

school year. This proposed change, 

moving the effective date by 

approximately two weeks to 

accommodate the earlier start for the 

school year, will not unduly impact 

vessel traffic. The reason for the two 

week change is to ensure that we 

encompass any changes to the school 

start date in the future. It will, however, 

revise the published bridge schedule to 

reflect its original intent. The Louisiana 

Department of Transportation and 

Development (LADOTD) and the 

Lafourche Parish Council (each agency 

owning three of the bridges) would like 

to change the beginning date of the 

regulation from August 15 of each year 

to August 1 of each year. The purpose 

of this proposed change is to eliminate 

confusion and conflict between the 

current published schedule and changes 

in the school year, causing vessel traffic 

holdups during the beginning of coming 

school years. All other aspects of the 

regulation will remain the same. 

Discussion of Rule 

The Coast Guard proposes changing 

the regulation in 33 CFR 117.465(a) so 

that it reflects the intent of the current 

rule allowing the bridge to remain 

closed to vessel traffic during peak 

traffic times during the entire school 

year. The proposed change will make 

the beginning date for the restriction 

August 1 instead of August 15. This 

proposed change will only minimally 

affect vessel operators using the 

waterway. All other aspects of the 

regulation will remain the same. 

Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on 13 of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

Regulatory Planning and Review 

This proposed rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review as supplemented 

by Executive Order 13563, Improving 

Regulation and Regulatory Review, and 

does not require an assessment of 

potential costs and benefits under 

section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 

12866. The Office of Management and 

Budget has not reviewed it under that 

Order. 


emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
22522 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

The Coast Guard does not consider 

this proposed rule to be a ‘‘significant’’ 

regulatory action because it is a merely 

a change in the start date for the 

restriction and does not further change 

existing or impose new restrictions 

affecting the way vessels operate on the 

waterway. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

This proposed rule will affect the 

following entities, some of which may 

be small entities: the owners or 

operators of vessels intending to transit 

the bridges Monday through Friday 

except Federal holidays during the 

hours of 7 a.m. to 8:30 a.m., from 2 p.m. 

to 4 p.m., and from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 

p.m. from August 1 through August 14. 

This action will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities because the 

change only adds two weeks to the 

current regulation. The current rule has 

been in effect for these vessels and 

waterway users since 2006. This change 

extends the effective period for the 

known restrictions to coincide with the 

full school year, which was the original 

intent of this rule. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rule would economically affect it. 

Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this rule so that they can 

better evaluate its effects on them and 

participate in the rulemaking. If the rule 

will affect your small business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact Mr. Jim 

Wetherington; Bridge Administration 

Branch, Eighth Coast Guard District; 

telephone 504–671–2128, email 

james.r.wetherington@uscg.mil. The 

Coast Guard will not retaliate against 

small entities that question or complain 

about this rule or any policy or action 

of the Coast Guard. 

Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would call for no 

new collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on State or local governments and 

would either preempt State law or 

impose a substantial direct cost of 

compliance on them. We have analyzed 

this rule under that Order and have 

determined that it does not have 

implications for federalism. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this 

proposed rule will not result in such an 

expenditure, we do discuss the effects of 

this rule elsewhere in this preamble. 

Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule will not cause a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Executive Order 13045, Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not 

an economically significant rule and 

would not create an environmental risk 

to health or risk to safety that might 

disproportionately affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01, 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD which guides the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions which do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 


emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules 22523 

the human environment because it 

simply promulgates the operating 

regulations or procedures for 

drawbridges. We seek any comments or 

information that may lead to the 

discovery of a significant environmental 

impact from this proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 

Bridges. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows: 

PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE 

OPERATION REGULATIONS 

1. The authority citation for part 117 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1; 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 0170.1. 

2. Revise § 117.465(a) to read as 

follows: 

§ 117.465 Lafourche Bayou. 

(a) The draws of the following bridges 

shall open on signal; except that, from 

August 1 through May 31, the draw 

need not open for the passage of vessels 

Monday through Friday except Federal 

holidays from 7 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.; from 

2 p.m. to 4 p.m.; and from 4:30 p.m. to 

5:30 p.m.: 

* * * * * 

Dated: March 23, 2012. 

Roy A. Nash, 

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, 

Eighth Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9074 Filed 4–13–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2012–0189] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; 2012 Ocean City Air 

Show; Atlantic Ocean, Ocean City, MD 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes 

establishing a safety zone on the 

navigable waters of the Atlantic Ocean 

in Ocean City, MD. This action is 

necessary to provide for the safety of life 

on navigable waters during the 2012 

Ocean City Air Show. This action is 

intended to restrict vessel traffic 

movement to protect mariners from the 

hazards associated with air show events. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before May 16, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2012–0189 using any one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 

5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these four methods. See the 

‘‘Public Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call or email Christopher O’Neal, 

Waterways Management Division Chief, 

Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard; 

telephone 757–668–5581, email 

Christopher.A.ONeal@uscg.mil. If you 

have questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Renee V. 

Wright, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2012–0189), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online (via http:// 

www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online via 

www.regulations.gov, it will be 

considered received by the Coast Guard 

when you successfully transmit the 

comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or 

mail your comment, it will be 

considered as having been received by 

the Coast Guard when it is received at 

the Docket Management Facility. We 

recommend that you include your name 

and a mailing address, an email address, 

or a telephone number in the body of 

your document so that we can contact 

you if we have questions regarding your 

submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will 

then become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu 

select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert 

‘‘USCG–2012–0189’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’ 

box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the 

balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. 

If you submit your comments by mail or 

hand delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit 

comments by mail and would like to 

know that they reached the Facility, 

please enclose a stamped, self-addressed 

postcard or envelope. We will consider 

all comments and material received 

during the comment period and may 

change the rule based on your 

comments. 

Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then 

become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2012– 

0189’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the 

‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’ 

column. You may also visit the Docket 

Management Facility in Room W12–140 

on the ground floor of the Department 

of Transportation West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. We have an agreement with 

the Department of Transportation to use 

the Docket Management Facility. 

Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 


emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS