alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMS Cooked Diced Chicken Contractor Indicator Organism Performance - Fiscal Year: 20211/,2/

Standard Plate Count3/ Total Coliforms4/ Generic E. coli5/ S. aureus6/

Contractor

# Sub-lots 

Produced 

(% of Total)

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit

C1 524 (83.6) 1 0.19 0 0 0 0 0 0

C4 103 (16.4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 627 (100.0) 1 0.16 0 0 0 0 0 0

1/A full description of the cooked diced chicken purchase program specification is available at https://www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food/product-specs#chicken. 2/Production Dates: October 1, 2020 to September 30, 2021. 3/Standard Plate Count Critical Limit: 1,000 CFU/g.

4/Total Coliforms Critical Limit: 50 CFU/g.

5/Generic E. coli Critical Limit: 10 CFU/g. 6/S. aureus Critical Limit: 10 CFU/g.
### 717 Brewster Avenue· La Grange Park· IL • 60526

Dear Secretary Foxx , May 15 , 2015 Secretary Anthony Foxx U . S Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington , DC 20590 Re : Docket No . DOT-OST-2015-0082 I work in the technology industry and travel internationally about eight times a year. Although I tend to choose certain domestic a irlines because of their loyalty programs , I still support open competition with foreign carriers . It is not the government's responsibility to protect the financial interests of U . S. airlines . They can protect their own bottom lines by offering competitive rates and quality service . Eliminating the competition doesn't benefit the consumer in any way. I have flown on foreign carriers before and find the flights to be roughly equivalent to those offered by domestic airlines . The competition between foreign and domestic carriers serves a very important purpose . It improves price , flight availability , and service for all travelers. Do not allow Delta , United , and American Airlines to d ictate how airline agreements are negotiated with foreign countries. Let competition drive the market , not government interference .

Michael Zahor



# s 10-150520-027

### Michael Zahorik 717 Brewster Avenue La Grange Park, IL 60526



# s 10-150520-027 1.4 · MAY 2Q1!. 5 P M 9 L

The Honorable Anth o ny Foxx Secretary of Transportation United States Department of Transportation ATTN : Docket Center Docket No . DOT-OST-2015-0082 1200 New Jersey Avenue , SE Washington , DC 20590 

# 'II"'''''I''" ,,,,,,,,,llllll•IJII"·· l'· " ' ''''

# I I

## Jll•ll··'

## Jill 

## I
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March
31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ John EmeryJohn EmeryChief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT









|1. | I am a duly authorized officer of BMW Financial Services NA, LLC;
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | I have reviewed the terms of that certain Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2022 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, as seller, servicer (in such
            capacity, the “Servicer”), administrator and custodian, U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as indenture trustee, BMW FS Securities LLC, as depositor, and BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2022-A, as issuer, and I have made, or have caused to
            be made under my supervision, a review of the activities of the Servicer and the performance of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement during the period from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3. | to the best of my knowledge, based on the review described in paragraph 2 above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects during
            the period from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:  March 26, 2024




By:  /s/ Ole
        Jensen


Name:  Ole Jensen


Title:  Vice
      President – Finance & Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of JER Investors
Trust Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Tae-Sik Yoon, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |        |  |                                                                
|------------------ |  | ------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  |       
|Date: May 10, 2007 |  |        |  | /s/ Tae-Sik Yoon                                               
|                   |  | Name:  |  | Tae-Sik Yoon                                                   
|                   |  | Title: |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### William J. Ramsey and Mary J. Ramsey, his Wife, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Theodore S. Coogler, Sr., and F. B. Coogler, Defendants in Error.

Division. B.

Writ of Error to Circuit Court, Hernando county; William S. Bullock. Judge.

*J. G. Dwoant,*for Plaintiffs in Error.

*G. G. Martin,*for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

This action was brought by the defendants in error against the plaintiffs in error. There was judgment for the plaintiffs, and- the defendants take writ of error. The judgment is affirmed.

Decision
(4910-13-Pj

RIN 2120-AA64

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

'fffJ~~

IDocket No. FAA-2009-*****j Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-218-AD]

<"J "'1 fi tif",U:

j-.Vl'J -'..,Iv \ i

Ainvorthincss Directivesj Airbus Model AJ30-201, -202, -203, -223, -243, -301, ~302,

-303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343 Series Airplanes, Model A340-211, -212,-

213, -311, -J 12, and -313 Series Airplanes, and Model -A340-54I and -642 Airplane-s

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SUl\'lMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products

listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing air'\\iorthiness

information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the tU1safe

condition as:

NGS\".IIlO~ I

-1rNl11l1l.,SIG

(.cL-

, !

I""" (.1"1,/,"'7

KmmN~ SHIIKJI,

This condition, if not corrected, could lead to an air leak, resulting

in incorrect total pressure measurement and consequent erroneous

Calibrated Airspeed (CAS)/MACH parameters delivered by the

Air Data Computer (ADC).

Several reports have recently been received of loose pneumatic

quick-disconnect unions on Goodrich pitot probes PIN (part

number) 0851 HL. These may be the result of mis-torque of the

affected unions at equipment manufacturing level. lnvcstigations

are stilt on-going to determine the root cause(s).

• • • • • • •

NJn"'-I>':;I(;

!/..},il

'-1'•• i,'. ",r~

.").'2(:/«/'

,-; -VI.-

r,-c.SY>rOOI.

-IOD

~'l6'~hr"\ w>;

"

12 b 01

- /0/

~1"Ar.s.'$lU /~

/' ,-'

Loss or fluctuation of indicated airspeed could result in providing misleading informatiOl /'
#### Mowery, Appellant, *v.*Ealey et al., Appellees.

(No. 31562

Decided December 1, 1948.)

*Messrs. Miller, Searl & Fitch*and *Mr. Ormond' 8.. Adams,*for appellant.

*Messrs. Kimble, Kimble S 8chápiro,*for appellees.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the-reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman,. Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.

Turner, J., not participating.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 710 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 710

Supporting Lights On Afterschool, a national celebration of afterschool 
                   programs held on October 25, 2018.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 28, 2018

    Ms. Collins (for herself and Ms. Smith) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting Lights On Afterschool, a national celebration of afterschool 
                   programs held on October 25, 2018.

Whereas more than 28,000,000 children in the United States have parents who work 
        outside the home;
Whereas high-quality programs that expand learning opportunities for children, 
        such as afterschool, before-school, summer, and expanded learning 
        opportunities, provide safe, challenging, engaging, and fun learning 
        experiences, including experiences that encourage the study of science, 
        technology, engineering, and math, that help children and youth develop 
        social, emotional, physical, cultural, and academic skills;
Whereas high-quality afterschool programs and high-quality expanded learning 
        opportunities provide students with hands-on, engaging lessons that are 
        aligned with the school day;
Whereas high-quality afterschool programs complement regular and expanded school 
        days and support working families by ensuring that the children of those 
        families are safe and productive during the hours parents are working;
Whereas high-quality afterschool programs engage families, schools, and diverse 
        community partners in advancing the well-being of children and youth in 
        the United States;
Whereas high-quality afterschool programs that partner with high-quality 
        community-based organizations build stronger communities by integrating 
        schools with the larger community; and
Whereas Lights On Afterschool, a national celebration of afterschool, before-
        school, summer, and expanded learning opportunities programs, held on 
        October 25, 2018, highlights the critical importance of those high-
        quality programs to children and the families and communities of those 
        children: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate supports Lights On Afterschool, a 
national celebration of afterschool programs held on October 25, 2018.
                                 <all>
```
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Jason Brinker, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (John Cataldo, J.H.O.), rendered July 15, 2015, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of violating New York City Parks and Recreation Department Rules (56 RCNY) ยง 1-03(c)(1), and sentencing him to a fine of $500 or, alternatively, fifteen days in jail.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (John Cataldo, J.H.O.), rendered July 15, 2015, affirmed.</p><p>The accusatory instrument was not jurisdictionally defective. The arresting officer's sworn allegations that, at a specified date and time, he "advised defendant numerous times to vacate a closed off field" in Central Park and that "defendant refused to leave," were "sufficiently evidentiary in character" (<i>People v Allen</i>, 92 NY2d 378, 385 [1998]) to establish, prima facie, that defendant "refuse[d] to comply with the lawful direction or command of any Police Officer," in violation of New York City Parks and Recreation Department Rules (56 RCNY) ยง 103(c)(1).</p><p>We find unavailing defendant's present claim that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel when the court, at defendant's request but over defense counsel's objection, did not consider the lesser (uncharged) offense of disorderly conduct. While such a decision is for defense counsel, not the accused, to make (<i>see People v Colville</i>, 20 NY3d 20, 31-32 [2012]), the error in deferring to defendant was harmless in this case, since the court had no authority to consider the uncharged offense of disorderly conduct because it was not a "lesser included offense" of the charged misdemeanor (CPL ยงยง 350.10[6], 1.20[37]; <i>see People v Greene</i>, 85 Misc 2d 890 [1976]). In this regard, disorderly conduct requires proof of an element - "intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof" (Penal Law ยง 240.20) - that is not required to establish a violation of 56 RCNY ยง 103(c)(1) (<i>see People v Green</i>, 56 NY2d 427, 431 [1982]; <i>People v Alvarez</i>, 66 Misc 2d 205 [1971]). </p><p>We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. The sentence imposed was well below the maximum penalty authorized by law (56 RCNY ยง 1-07[a]). Although the court offered a lesser fine to induce a plea, it was free, once the defendant rejected the plea offer and was found guilty after trial, to impose a greater, but nevertheless lawful sentence (<i>see People v Pena</i>, 50 <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>NY2d 400, 412 [1980], <i>cert. denied</i> 449 US 1087 [1981]).</p><br>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.<br>I concur I concur <br>Decision Date: January 20, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
AMS Cooked Diced Chicken Contractor Indicator Organism Performance - Fiscal Year: 20181/,2/

Standard Plate Count3/ Total Coliforms4/ Generic E. coli5/ 

Contractor

# Sub-lots 

Produced 

(% of Total)

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit

C1 912 (84.9) 2 0.22 10 1.10 3 0.33 

C4 162 (15.1) 1 0.62 4 2.47 1 0.62 

Total 1,074 (100.0) 3 0.28 14 1.30 4 0.37 

1/A full description of the cooked diced chicken purchase program specification is available at https://www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food/product-specs#chicken.2/Production Dates: October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018.3/Standard Plate Count Critical Limit: 1,000 CFU/g.4/Total Coliforms Critical Limit: 50 CFU/g.5/Generic E. coli Critical Limit: 10 CFU/g.6/S. aureus Critical Limit: 10 CFU/g.
Exhibit 10.8



AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT



THIS AMENDMENT No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the LOAN AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) by and between Owl Rock Feeder FIC LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Lender”) and Owl Rock Technology Finance Corporation II, a Maryland corporation (the “Borrower”) is made, entered into and effective as of March 14, 2022 (the “Effective Date”).



RECITALS

WHEREAS, capitalized terms used but not defined herein, have the meaning given thereto in the Agreement;and



WHEREAS, the parties desire to enter into this Amendment to modify the manner in which interest is calculated.



AGREEMENTS

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained, it is hereby agreed as follows:



1. Paragraph 5 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:




Interest.



a) Advances made under the Revolving Note prior to March 14, 2022 shall bear interest at a rate equal to the lesser of (i) the rate of interest for an ABR Loan or (ii) the rate of interest for a Eurodollar Loan under the Credit Agreement dated as of April 15, 2021, as amended or supplemented from time to time (the “ MUFG Agreement ”), by and among Owl Rock Capital Advisors LLC, as Borrower, the several lenders from time to time party thereto, MUFG Union Bank, N.A., as Collateral Agent and MUFG Bank, Ltd., as Administrative Agent.


b) Advances made under the Revolving Note on or after March 14, 2022 shall bear interest at a rate equal to the lesser of (i) the rate of interest for a SOFR Loan or (ii) the rate of interest for an ABR Loan under the Credit Agreement dated as of December 7, 2021, as amended or supplemented from time to time (the “ MUFG Agreement ”), by and among Blue Owl Finance LLC, as Borrower, Blue Owl Capital Holdings LP and Blue Owl Capital Carry LP as Parent Guarantors, the Subsidiary Guarantors party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as Co-Documentation Agents and MUFG Bank, Ltd., as Administrative Agent.


c) The particular interest rate for each Advance shall be set forth on Schedule A to the Revolving Note and shall be prima facie evidence of the interest rate for such Advance.






[intentionally blank]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,each of the Borrower and Lender have caused this Amendment No. 1 to be executed and delivered by its respective duly authorized officer, as of the date first shown above.





Owl Rock Technology Finance Corp. II

| |  |     |                                                    
| |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------
| |  | By: | /s/ Jonathan Lamm                                  
| |  |     | Jonathan Lamm                                      
| |  |     | Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Owl Rock Feeder FIC LLC

| |  |     |                        
| |  | --- | -----------------------
| |  | By: | /s/ Alan Kirshenbaum   
| |  |     | Alan Kirshenbaum       
| |  |     | Chief Financial Officer



---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

February 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135366 & (60)(61) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

MICHIGAN ex rel THE MUSKEGON Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, COUNTY PROSECUTOR, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 135366 

 COA: 281321 

Muskegon CC: 07-045526-AW

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 

and WAYNE LEE STEVENS, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the November 29, 2007 judgment of the Court of 

Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED. 

MARKMAN, J., concurs and states as follows: 

The prosecutor, in my judgment, raises reasonable questions concerning 

(a) whether the Department of Correction’s “immediate usage” method of computing 

good-time and special good-time credits is in better accord with MCL 800.33 than the 

“earn as you serve” method identified by the prosecutor, and (b) whether an inmate’s 

escape sentence properly begins before the inmate’s murder sentence has reached its 

statutory maximum or before the parole board has expressly terminated the murder 

sentence. However, in light of the fact that the department’s current policies and 

practices have been employed for more than a half century, and in light of the reliance 

interests that have arisen in connection with these policies and practices, I believe that 

further relief must come from the legislative or executive branches of government. See 

People v Lively, 470 Mich 248, 259 (2004) (Markman, J., concurring). 

t0205 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 8, 2008 

 Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7430

NATHANIEL ELLERBE, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT ANDERSON; CLARENCE HALL,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

WILLIS GRIFFIN; ALVIA SUTTON,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District

Judge. (CA-94-19-5-BR)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 4, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel Ellerbe, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Sylvia Hargett Thibaut,

Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm the grant of summary judgment on qualified immunity

grounds. Ellerbe v. Anderson, No. CA-94-19-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 23,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
AMS Unpasteurized Liquid Whole Eggs for Further Processing Contractor Indicator Organism Performance - Fiscal Year: 20221/,2/

Standard Plate Count3/ Total Coliforms4/ Generic E. coli5/

Contractor

# Lots Produced 

(% of Total)

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit

C1 85 (23.7) 3 3.5 5 5.9 3 3.5

C4 266 (74.1) 17 6.4 3 1.1 5 1.9

C8 8 (2.2) 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 359 (100.0) 20 5.6 8 2.2 8 2.2

1/A full description of the unpasteurized liquid whole eggs for further processing purchase program specification is available at https://www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food/product-specs#Eggs. 2/Production Dates: October 1, 2021 to September 30, 2022. 3/Standard Plate Count Critical Limit: 50,000 CFU/g.

4/Total Coliforms Critical Limit: 5,000 CFU/g.

5/Generic E. coli Critical Limit: 1,000 CFU/g.