alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by. Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

167) ll-E-127 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:09 AM Sheet 167 of 264 
P.2 

01/28/1998 10:45 732636G624 

01/27/98 18:38 ©19199410234 

FIBRENETICS INC 

PES RTP NC 

PAGE 02 

8)002/002 

From: 

Date: 

Contact: 

Company: 

A 945 ? 

n.-E?/r7 

Contact Report 

Robert Jemison, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

January 27,1998 

Mr. Herbert T. Segars 

f ibrenetics, Inc. 

Tefepbene Number. (732)636-5670 

Fax Number. (732)636-6624 

!QCT'£'2!9$ 

EPA AIR DOCKET 

Contact Summary: 

Mr. Herbert T. Segars was contacted on behalf of the U.S. EPA to update information provided 

in the 1993 EPA Reinforced Plastic Composites Screening Survey submitted by Fibrenetics, Inc. for 

their facility located in Woodbridge, New Jersey. In response to my questions Mr. Segars indicated 

the following: 

The facility produces various fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) products for corrosion 

resistant applications including tanks, scrubbers, ducting, snd piping. 

The facility still uses hand lay-up (bucket & brush/non-pTessure-fed roller) to apply polyester 

and vinyl ester resins in the fabrication of corrosion resistant products. The vjnyl ester and polyester 

resins applied by hand lay-up contain between 36V* and 50% HAP by weight with a facility-wide 

average of approximately 45% HAP by weight. The only HAP Initially present in the polyester or 

vinyl eiter resins is styrene. 

For the majority of the resin systems applied using hand lay-up, no additional HAP is added 

to the resin during the fabrication process with the exception of small amounts of HAP that may (or 

may not) be present in initiators, promoters and/or catalysts added to the resin. Approximately 10% 

of the resin systems applied using hand lay-up contain vapor suppressants. The remaining 90% of the 

resin systems applied using hand lay-up do not contain vapor suppressants due to "secondary bonding" 

problems created by the presence of vapor suppressants. 

The facility still uses atomized mechanical spray-up to apply polyester and vinyl ester resins 

in the fabrication of corrosion resistant products. The vinyl ester and polyester resins applied by 

atomized mechanical spray contain between 36% and $0% HAP by weight with a facility-wide 

average of approximately 45% HAP by weight. The only HAP initially present in the polyester or 

vinyl ester resins is styrene. 

For the majority of the resin systems applied using atomized mechanical spray-up, no 

additional HAP is added to the resin during the fabrication process with the exception of small 

amounts of HAP mat may (or may not) be present in initiators, promoters and/or catalysts added to 

the resin. None of the resin systems applied using atomized mechanical spray contain vapor 

suppressants due to "secondary bonding" problems created by the presence of vapor suppressants. 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE ^JtM^AT^/4^y^-*
# C_2004094EN.01002801.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/28

---

Action brought on 24 February 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Italian Republic

(Case C-92/04)

(2004/C 94/60)

An action against the Italian Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 24 February 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by C. Cattabriga, acting as Agent.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2001/102/EC (1) of 27 November 2001 amending Directive 1999/29/EC (2) on the undesirable substances and products in animal nutrition, or by not communicating those provisions to the Commission, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2001/102/EC (1) of 27 November 2001 amending Directive 1999/29/EC (2) on the undesirable substances and products in animal nutrition, or by not communicating those provisions to the Commission, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1) of that directive;

1

2

| — | Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The time-limit for the transposition of the directive expired on 1 July 2002.

---

(1)  OJ 2002 L 6 of 10.01.2002, p. 45.

1

(2)  OJ 1999 L 115 of 4.5.1999, p. 32.

2

---
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Rand Logistics, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 11, 2009 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      August 11, 2009
            
            /s/ Joseph
      W. McHugh, Jr.Joseph
      W. McHugh, Jr.Chief
      Financial Officer
SERVED APRIL 21,2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

DARBY AVIATION, 

Respondent. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP08SO0026 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

DMS NO. FAA-2008-1192 

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S ORDER EXTENDING 

DEADLINE FOR FILING PROPOSED TRANSCRIPT 

CORRECTIONS 

Counsel for the Complainant has sought an extension of the April 20, 

2010 deadline for filing proposed transcript corrections. He states that the 

request is caused by delay in obtaining the hearing transcript, and that 

counsel for the Respondent joins in his request. 

In consideration of the foregoing, and for good cause shown, the 

deadline for submission of proposed transcript corrections is extended from 

April 20, 2010 to May 20, 2010. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

^':omm 

Isaac D. Benkin 

Administrative Law Judge 
FAA Docket No. CP08SO0026 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

UPDATED SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Deanna L. Weidner, Respondent's Counsel 

Anderson & Associates, LLC 

505 20th Street North 

Financial Center, Suite 1450 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

TEL: 205-324-1230 

FAX: 205-322-3890 

E-MAIL: dlweidner@davidbandersonlaw.com 

RajTnond Veatch, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave. S.W. 

Washington DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-9676 

E-MAIL: Raymond.Veatch@faa.gov 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

E-MAIL: David.Benkin@dot.gov 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use tlie following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC~430.
~OS741

• UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

~ _____ 75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

‘kL pRO1~’

October 17, 2014

Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency

Bldg No.2695, Window Rock Blvd

Window Rock AZ 86515

ATTN: ADM1N OFFICE

Subject: Public documents at the Navajo Nation EPA for public inspection

Dear Sir or Madam:

The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency sent you a package containing a number of documents

regarding the McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation

near the city of Aneth, San Juan County, Utah. Two of these documents contained an error, and need

to be replaced. Please replace the following documents in the package previously sent to you with

the enclosed documents:

1. PUBLIC INFORMATION SHEET

2. AMBIENT AIR QUALITY IMPACT REPORT & FACT SHEET

Your assistance with this matter is greatly appreciated. Feel free to contact me at (415) 947-4156 or

kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Shaheerah Kelly, Environmental Engineer

Permits Office

Air Division

Enclosures
# C_2004111EN.01000702.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case IV/M.3384 - Aegon / CAM/JV Mediterraneo Vida)

(2004/C 111/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 22 April 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 4064/89. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office of Official Publications of the European Communities (see list on the last page). |
| --- | --- |

—

as a paper version through the sales offices of the Office of Official Publications of the European Communities (see list on the last page).

| — | in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3384. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law; |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form in the ‘CEN’ version of the CELEX database, under document number 304M3384. CELEX is the computerized documentation system of European Community law;

for more information concerning subscriptions please contact:

| EUR-OP, |
| --- |
| Information, Marketing and Public Relations (OP/4B), |
| 2, rue Mercier, |
| L-2925 Luxembourg. |
| Tel. (352)-2929 42455, fax: (352)-2929 42763 |

EUR-OP,

Information, Marketing and Public Relations (OP/4B),

2, rue Mercier,

L-2925 Luxembourg.

Tel. (352)-2929 42455, fax: (352)-2929 42763

---
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 5 (Monday, January 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1051-1052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-88]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

[Docket No. APHIS-2011-0115]


General Conference Committee of the National Poultry Improvement 
Plan; Meeting

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are giving notice of a meeting of the General Conference 
Committee of the National Poultry Improvement Plan.

DATES: The meeting will be held on January 25, 2012, from 1:30 p.m. to 
5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Georgia World Congress 
Center, 285 Andrew Young International Boulevard NW., Atlanta, GA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. C. Stephen Roney, Senior 
Coordinator, National Poultry Improvement Plan, VS, APHIS, 1506 
Klondike Road, Suite 300, Conyers, GA 30094; (770) 922-3496.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The General Conference Committee (the 
Committee) of the National Poultry Improvement Plan (NPIP), 
representing cooperating State agencies and poultry industry members, 
serves an essential

[[Page 1052]]

function by acting as liaison between the poultry industry and the 
Department in matters pertaining to poultry health.
    Topics for discussion at the upcoming meeting include:
    1. Use of performance standards in the NPIP regulations.
    2. The Food and Drug Administration's egg safety rule and NPIP 
salmonella testing equivalency update.
    3. Compartmentalization.
    4. 2012 Biennial Conference.
    The meeting will be open to the public. However, due to time 
constraints, the public will not be allowed to participate in the 
discussions during the meeting. Written statements on meeting topics 
may be filed with the Committee before or after the meeting by sending 
them to the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. 
Written statements may also be filed at the meeting. Please refer to 
Docket No. APHIS-2011-0115 when submitting your statements.
    This notice of meeting is given pursuant to section 10 of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act.

    Done in Washington, DC, this 3rd day of January 2012.
Gregory L. Parham,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-88 Filed 1-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
LM_XB463

Des Moines, IA April 12, 2010 USDA Market News

NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE BOXED BEEF CUTOUT - ALL FED STEER/HEIFER SALES

For Week Ending: 4/9/2010

Whole report includes:

All sales types, all delivery periods, all delivery locations

Fresh, frozen, and aged product

All MCOOL categories

Only fed steer/heifer beef, no cow or blended cow product

Prime, Choice, Select, ungraded, and branded product

Note; Select branded product is absorbed into the Select category

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Comprehensive Prime *Branded Choice Select Ungraded

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unique aspects of this cutout section:

Only packer’s beef item codes equivalent to an IMPS item are used in these cutout 

calculations. Specialty cut product, small box product and small chub GB are 

examples of items we don’t equate to IMPS. Cut items do not include dairy bred

steer/heifer source, but we do use dairy bred in trimmings and grinds. 

Weekly Cutout Value 162.08 181.00 165.79 162.14 159.76 154.67

Primal Rib 238.56 303.68 243.23 234.80 235.75 223.64

Primal Chuck 125.45 124.60 127.43 124.43 125.56 126.05

Primal Round 138.77 137.77 140.16 137.75 138.33 136.77

Primal Loin 237.18 294.40 246.94 242.42 228.04 210.82

Primal Brisket 118.57 116.75 122.23 116.75 118.96 121.64

Primal Short Plate 106.83 106.83 106.83 106.83 106.83 106.83

Primal Flank 91.74 91.66 92.77 91.64 91.17 91.05

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unique aspects of this volume section:

All fed steer/heifer (including dairy bred) product is included, regardless if it’s

equivalent to an IMPS item or not. 

TOTAL LOADS 6,937

Prime 52

Branded* 740

Choice 2,033 Quality breakdown section

Select 1,206

Ungraded** 2,905

Total 6,936

TYPE OF SALES

Negotiated 0-21 2,621

Negotiated 22/up 874 Sales Breakdown section 

Formula 3,132

Forward Contract _ 309

Total 6,936

Domestic 6,287

NAFTA Exports 191 Destination Breakdown section 

Overseas Exports __458

Total 6,936

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* Includes all Choice branded. (Upper 2/3rds and lower 1/3rd)

** Includes cuts, grinds, and trim.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

STEPHEN EDWARD WEAVER, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 1 WAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

Justice Donohue did not participate in the consideration or decision of this 

matter.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Artcraft
I Inc. for the quarter ending August 31, 2004, I, Scott Raleigh, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Artcraft I Inc. hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-KSB for the quarter ending August 31,
          2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the quarter ending August 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Artcraft I Inc.

Dated:  October 8, 2004

ARTCRAFT I INC.


By: /s/ Scott Raleigh
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RiskMetrics Group, Inc.(the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                      The Report,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                      The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

Date:August 4, 2009

 
| /s/  M. Ethan Berman            |     |
|---------------------------------|----------|
| M.  Ethan Berman                |     |
| *(Principal Executive Officer)* | * * |

 

----
1

The Honorable Charles B. Kornmann, United States District Judge for the

District of South Dakota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

John E. Simko, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of South Dakota. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-3666

___________

Sandy Grodzin, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of South Dakota.

Michael J. Astrue, *

Commissioner of Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: April 21, 2010

Filed: April 28, 2010

___________

Before BYE, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Sandy Grodzin appeals the district court’s1

 order affirming the denial of

widow’s insurance benefits. We grant Grodzin leave to appeal in forma pauperis.

Having carefully reviewed the record, see Wildman v Astrue, 596 F.3d 959, 963-64

(8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review), we agree with the district court that the decision
-2-

at issue here is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

_________________________
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEPHEN YAGMAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

JOSEPH CURTIS EDMONDSON, 

Defendant, 

and 

MICHAEL J. COLELLO, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-55384 

D.C. No. 2:15-cv-07210-DSF-SS 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 15, 2018**

Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Michael J. Colello appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 18 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-55384 

for attorney’s fees. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for 

an abuse of discretion. Graham–Sult v. Clainos, 756 F.3d 724, 751 (9th 

Cir. 2014). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Colello’s motion 

for attorney’s fees under Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.16(c) because Colello failed to 

establish adequately the hours reasonably spent preparing the anti-SLAPP motion

and a reasonable hourly rate for private attorneys in the community. See Ketchum 

v. Moses, 17 P.3d 735, 745 (Cal. 2001) (“A fee request that appears unreasonably 

inflated is a special circumstance permitting the trial court to reduce the award or 

deny one altogether.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of LAYCOR VENTURES CORP.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Robert Wayne Morgan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 10th day of March, 2005.



| | /s/ Robert Wayne Morgan                                                                                                                              
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Robert Wayne Morgan                                                                                                                                  
| | President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and sole member of the Board of Directors























---
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II,
      L.P.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Crit S. DeMent, Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November
              14, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Crit
              S.
              DeMentCrit
              S. DeMentChief
                Executive Officer of the General
                Partner