alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2004094EN.01003404.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/34

---

Removal from the register of Case C-199/02 (1)

1

(2004/C 94/84)

By order of 18 February 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case C-199/02: European Parliament v Chubb Insurance Company of Europe SA and Others.

---

(1)  OJ C 233 of 28.09.2002.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Solo Cup Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the thirteen weeks ended June 26, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert M. Korzenski, as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert M. KorzenskiRobert M. KorzenskiChief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)August 12, 2011


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.


A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 43 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 43

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the printing of a revised and updated version of the House 
     document entitled ``Black Americans in Congress, 1870-1989''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 43

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. PRINTING OF REVISED VERSION OF ``BLACK AMERICANS IN 
              CONGRESS, 1870-1989''.

    (a) In General.--An updated version of House Document 101-117, 
entitled ``Black Americans in Congress, 1870-1989'' (as revised by the 
Library of Congress), shall be printed as a House document by the 
Public Printer, with illustrations and suitable binding, under the 
direction of the Committee on House Administration of the House of 
Representatives.
    (b) Number of Copies.--In addition to the usual number, there shall 
be printed 30,700 copies of the document referred to in subsection (a), 
of which--
            (1) 25,000 shall be for the use of the Committee on House 
        Administration of the House of Representatives; and
            (2) 5,700 shall be for the use of the Committee on Rules 
        and Administration of the Senate.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 21, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
|   |                    |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: |   May 5, 2011 | By:    | /s/    |   |   | ROBERT E. SWANSON                                    |
|   |                    |   | Name:  |   |   | Robert E. Swanson                                    |
|   |                    |   | Title: |   |   | Chief Executive Officer                              |
|   |                    |   |   |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                        |
|   |                    |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
|   |                    |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
| Dated: |   May 5, 2011 | By:    | /s/    |   |   | KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |                    |   | Name:  |   |   | Kathleen P. McSherry                                 |
|   |                    |   | Title: |   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                    |   |   |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer)                        |
|   |                    |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
|   |                    |   |   |   |   |                                                 |

----
391 A.2d 686

#### Commonwealth v. George H. Johnson, Appellant.

Submitted November 14, 1977.

Charles M. Schwartz, for appellant; Robert E. Colville, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Order affirmed.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 89 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 89

   Supporting the designation of March 2017 as ``National Colorectal 
                       Cancer Awareness Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 15, 2017

    Mr. Enzi (for himself and Mr. Menendez) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Supporting the designation of March 2017 as ``National Colorectal 
                       Cancer Awareness Month''.

Whereas colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among men 
        and women combined in the United States;
Whereas, in 2017, more than 135,430 individuals in the United States will be 
        diagnosed with colorectal cancer and approximately 50,260 more will die 
        from it;
Whereas colorectal cancer is one of the most preventable forms of cancer because 
        screening tests can find polyps that can be removed before becoming 
        cancerous;
Whereas screening tests can detect colorectal cancer early, which is when 
        treatment works best;
Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that if every 
        individual who is 50 years of age or older had regular screening tests, 
        as many as 60 percent of deaths from colorectal cancer could be 
        prevented;
Whereas the 5-year survival rate for patients with localized colorectal cancer 
        is 90 percent, but only 39 percent of all diagnoses occur at that stage;
Whereas colorectal cancer screenings can effectively reduce the incidence of 
        colorectal cancer and mortality, but 1 in 3 adults between 50 and 75 
        years of age are not up to date with recommended colorectal cancer 
        screening;
Whereas public awareness and education campaigns on colorectal cancer 
        prevention, screening, and symptoms are held during the month of March 
        each year; and
Whereas educational efforts can help provide to the public information on 
        methods of prevention and screening, as well as symptoms for early 
        detection: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports--
                    (A) the designation of March 2017 as ``National 
                Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month''; and
                    (B) the goals and ideals of National Colorectal 
                Cancer Awareness Month; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        National Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month with appropriate 
        awareness and educational activities.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby gives notice that members of the Commission's staff may attend the following meeting related to the transmission planning activities of the Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP):

## Strategic Planning Committee

April 9, 2012.

8 a.m.-3 p.m. Local Time.

The above-referenced meeting will be held at: Renaissance Oklahoma City, 10 North Broadway Avenue, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102.

The above-referenced meeting is open to stakeholders.

                    Further information may be found at                     *www.spp.org*.                

The discussions at the meeting described above may address matters at issue in the following proceedings:

                    Docket No. ER09-35-001,                     *Tallgrass Transmission, LLC.*

                    Docket No. ER09-36-001,                     *Prairie Wind Transmission, LLC.*

                    Docket No. ER09-548-001,                     *ITC Great Plains, LLC.*

                    Docket No. ER11-4105-000,                     *Southwest Power Pool, Inc.*

                    Docket No. EL11-34-001,                     *Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.*

                    Docket No. ER11-3967-002,                     *Southwest Power Pool, Inc.*

                    Docket No. ER11-3967-003,                     *Southwest Power Pool, Inc.*

                    Docket No. ER12-1179-000,                     *Southwest Power Pool, Inc.*

                    For more information, contact Luciano Lima, Office of Energy Markets Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at (202) 502-6210 or                     *luciano.lima@ferc.gov*.                

Dated: April 4, 2012.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-8645 Filed 4-10-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
* Of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit,

sitting by designation. 

# United Stat es Court of A ppeals

For the First C ircuit

No. 03-2032 ANGEL YUANES RIVERA-MARTINEZ, Petitioner, Appellant,

v. JOHN D. ASHCROFT, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge ]
Before Torruella, Circuit Judge , Rosenn, * Senior Circuit Judge , and Howard, Circuit Judge . Emanuel Howard for petitioner-appellant. Barry J. Pettinato , Senior Litigation Couns el , Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, with whom Peter D. Keisler , Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, and David V. Bernal , Assistant Director, were on brief, for respondent-appellee. November 4, 2004
**Exhibit 15.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in RegistrationStatement on Amendment No. 4 of Form F-4 (No. 333-267653) of our report dated March 30, 2022, relating to the balancesheet of TPB Acquisition Corporation I as of December 31, 2021, and the related statements of operations, changes in shareholders’deficit and cash flows for the period from February 8, 2021 (inception) through December 31, 2021, incorporated by referencein this Shell Company Report on Form 20-F, and to the reference to our Firm under the caption "Statement by Experts" included herein.

 

/s/ Frank, Rimerman + Co. LLP

 

San Francisco, California

March 6, 2023
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 640 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 640

Recognizing September 25, 2018, as ``National Voter Registration Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 2018

   Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mr. Blunt) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing September 25, 2018, as ``National Voter Registration Day''.

    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes September 25, 2018, as ``National Voter 
        Registration Day''; and
            (2) encourages each voting-eligible citizen of the United 
        States--
                    (A) to register to vote;
                    (B) to verify with the appropriate State or local 
                election official that the name, address, and other 
                personal information on record is current; and
                    (C) to go to the polls on election day and vote if 
                the voting-eligible citizen would like to do so.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Peter C. Mann, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this quarterly report of Prestige BrandsInternational, LLC on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable, and that informationcontained in such quarterly report fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Prestige Brands International,LLC.

 
|   | **/s/ PETER C. MANN** |
|--------|-----------------------|
|   | Name:                 | Peter C.  Mann |
|   | Title:                | Manager,  President and Chief Executive  Officer |
|   | Date:                 | August 9,  2005 |

 

1

----
# C_2004094EN.01003602.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/36

---

Removal from the register of Case C-43/03 (1)

1

(2004/C 94/98)

By order of 6 January 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case C-43/03: Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic.

---

(1)  OJ C 70 of 22.03.2003.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Solo Cup Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Robert L. Hulseman, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert L. Hulseman 
|Robert L. Hulseman     
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 12, 2005           





4
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6929

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JESUS HALL, a/k/a Weedy, a/k/a Jesse Hail,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CR97-365; CA-05-1393)

Submitted: September 27, 2005 Decided: October 3, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jesus Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Manuelian, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jesus Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

60(b), seeking reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C. §

2255 (2000) motion. Because Hall’s motion did not assert a defect

in the collateral review process itself, but rather reargued the

merits of his § 2255 motion based on new case law, the motion was

properly characterized a successive § 2255 motion under our

decision in United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 207 (4th Cir.

2003). To appeal an order denying a Rule 60(b) motion in a habeas

action, Hall must establish entitlement to a certificate of

appealability. See Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 368 (4th Cir.

2004).

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Hall has not made the requisite showing.
- 3 -

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. To the extent that Hall’s notice of appeal and

informal brief could be construed as a motion for authorization to

file a successive § 2255 motion, we deny such authorization. See

Winestock, 340 F.3d at 208. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### In the Matter of L. N., A Child Under the Age of 18 Years.

No. P-80-476.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Sept. 2, 1980.

ORDER DENYING WRIT OF PROHIBITION

The petitioner has applied for a writ of this Court to prohibit the District Court of Sequoyah County, the Honorable Fred D. *240Green presiding, from prosecuting him for Arson in the First Degree, according to 21 O.S.Supp.1979, § 1401.

The allegations of his petition are as follows: An information was filed on May 23, 1980, charging petitioner with Arson in the First Degree of a schoolhouse. Petitioner is seventeen years of age. For the purposes of this writ, the petitioner and the District Attorney agree that the only persons present in the building at the time of the alleged crime were petitioner’s companions. Petitioner’s Motions to Quash and to Dismiss and Plea in Abatement were heard in a purported preliminary hearing on July 1, 1980, but the district court reserved to rule on those motions until this Court had decided whether the facts constituted Arson in the First or Second Degree. At that hearing, however, the district court did find sufficient evidence to believe that a crime had been committed and reasonable cause to believe that the petitioner had committed the crime.

This Court has consistently refused to issue advisory opinions, and the Supreme Court has recently adopted that same position. See *Application of Fun Country Development Authority,*Okl., 566 P.2d 1167 (1977). In writing for that Court, the Honorable Justice Doolin said, “No controversy is here presented, no contest or challenge as to procedure is made,” *Application of Fun Country Development Authority,*supra p. 1167.

As this Court said in *Johns v. Hess,*Okl.Cr., 546 P.2d 652 (1976), unless we are vested with original jurisdiction, all exercise of power must be derived from our appellate jurisdiction, which is the power and the jurisdiction to review and correct those proceedings of inferior courts brought for determination in the manner provided by law. Although the *Johns*opinion concerned the power of this Court to issue a writ of mandamus, the reasoning applies. An advisory opinion does not fall within the Court’s original or statutory jurisdiction; neither does it come within its appellate review. To offer advice in the form of an opinion would be to interfere with the responsibility of the trial court to exercise the powers confided to it. We will not do so absent constitutional or statutory authority.

Extraordinary writs are issued only in aid of our appellate jurisdiction. Title 22 O.S.Supp.1979, Ch. 18, App., Rule 1.25, subd. B. The petition filed herein fails to allege facts sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court insofar as the request is not for relief but, in fact, for an advisory opinion regarding the crime with which this petitioner should be charged. See 22 O.S.1971, § 1051.

Therefore, after reviewing the petition, this Court finds that it should be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.