alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered October 12, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 22 - 00685 - CV TIFFANY LONG AND ALL OCCUPANTS , Appellant /Cross - Appellee V. PARATHEKE ENTERPRISES, LLC , Appellee /Cross - Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021 - 1 - 195CV

O RDER Befor e the Court is appellee /cross

- appellant’s October 11, 2022 unopposed first motion for extension of time to file it s combined appellee/cross

- appellant’s brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than November 21, 2022.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.1  Certifications  I, Mike Mckeever, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-P3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d- 18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following  unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Computershare Trust Company, National  Association.  Date: March 29, 2023  Mike Mckeever   President   Carvana Receivables Depositor LLC   (senior officer in charge of securitization)  /s/ Mike Mckeever
FW:Updates on Veolia Permitting Action Updates on Veolia Permitting Action

Elizabeth J . Elizabeth J.Hubertz Hubertz Hubertz to: Andrea Morgan 12/19/2012 01:53 PM

Cc: Damico.Genevieve, David Ogulei

Hi Andrea -- we have been working with Kathy Andria in connection with Veolia . 

Could you please add me (ejhubertz@wulaw.wustl.edu) and our environmental scientist Ken Miller 

(kmiller@wulaw.wustl.edu) to the email list of people you notify when the comment period for the 

Veolia reopened permit begins or when you have any other updates on the matter ? 

Thank you very much and have a great holiday season!

Liz

Elizabeth J. Hubertz

Clinic Attorney

Interdisciplinary Environmental Clinic

Washington University School of Law

Campus Box 1120

St. Louis, MO 63130

Phone: 314.935.8760

Fax: 314.935.5171

Email: ejhubertz@wulaw.wustl.edu

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Morgan.Andrea@epamail.epa.gov

Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:56:27 -0600

Subject: Updates on Veolia Permitting Action

To: Kathy Andria <kathyandria@gmail.com>, Amy Funk

<amyfunk@illinois.edu>, Verena Owen <baumling@aol.com>, David Bender

<bender@mwbattorneys.com>, Samantha Ballard

<breaking.reality@gmail.com>, Kat Logan Smith

<klogansmith@moenviron.org>

Cc: Ogulei.David@epamail.epa.gov, Damico.Genevieve@epamail.epa.gov,

Woolums.Jane@epamail.epa.gov

Everyone,

I hope the season is finding you well. We wanted to provide you all with a

few updates on the permitting action pertaining to Veolia Environmental

Services. Veolia has withdrawn their application to modify their Title V

permit. EPA plans to continue to reopen Veolia's Title V permit under 40

C.F.R. § 71.7(f) to incorporate feedrate limits. We expect to public

notice the draft permit in early 2013 and will notify you all by email

when the comment period begins.
Thank you,

Andrea Morgan

Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Region 5 | Air & Radiation Division

Phone: (312) 353-6058 | Fax: (312) 692-2920
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Second Amended
Quarterly Report of INverso Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter
ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Randall S. Goulding, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:      June
      30, 2009
              /s/
      Randall S. GouldingBy:  Randall
      S. GouldingIts:  Chief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
INverso Corp. and will be retained by INverso Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Cooperative Milk Producers Association 

P. 0. Box 540 

Blackstone, VA 23824-0540 

Phone (434) 292-MILK (6455) 

October 28, 2022 

Via electro11ic mail to: Daua.coafe(ji)usda.gov 

Ms. Dana Coale, Deputy Administrator 

Agricultural Marketing Service 

United States Department ofAgriculture 

USDA-AMS-1400 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, D.C. 20250-0225 

Re: Request for a hearing to amend Federal Milk Marketing Orders 5, 6 and 7 

Dear Ms. Coale, 

This letter confirms the support of Cooperative Milk Producers Association for a 

hearing to amend the southeastern US federal milk orders as requested by DCMA in the 

request letter from Attorney Marvin Beshore. This further confirms our support for the 

five proposals submitted with the hearing request. We respectfully request that a hearing 

be held on an emergency basis to expedite the relief requested to our orders. 

Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

ffi't:[i.{u~

General Manager
Exhibit32.1

|          1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|     2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of      Registrant. |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                     |                                             |                     |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                     |                                             |                     |
| Dated:      May 14, 2009 |                                             | /s/      David M. Barnes |
|                     | David      M. BarnesChief      Executive Officer |
|                     |                                             |                     |

----
[No. 34099-9-I.

Division One.

June 10, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Robert S. Green, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Sno-homish County, No. 93-1-00173-2, Thomas J. Wynne, J., entered February 7,1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Grosse, J., concurred in by Baker, C.J., and Webster, J.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 02-10033

Summary Calendar

MARK ALLEN SMITH,

Petitioner-Appellant,

VERSUS

JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division

(4:01-CV-230-Y)

January 3, 2003

Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Petitioner Mark Allen Smith appeals the district court’s

denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus pursuant

to a certificate of appealability granted by our court in an order

dated June 6, 2002. Smith argues that his procedural due processrights were violated when the state failed to give him notice that

it sought to use a pending driving while intoxicated charge to

prevent him from being assigned to an Intermediate Secure Facility

(ISF) after revocation of parole. We now affirm the district

court’s denial of habeas relief.

We review the district court’s denial of petitioner’s habeas

application de novo as to questions of law and for clear error as

to factual findings. D yer v. Johnson

, 108 F.3d 607, 609 (5th Cir.

1997). Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act

(AEDPA) the district court may grant petitions for habeas corpus on

claims adjudicated on the merits in state court only where the

state determination was “contrary to” or an “unreasonable

application of” clearly established federal law as dete rmined by

the Supreme Court. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). A § 2254 applicant may

also obtain relief on a claim adjudicated on the merits in state

court if the claim “resulted in a decision that was based on an

unreasonable determination of t he facts in light of the evidence

presented in the State court proceeding.” § 2254(d)(2).

Here petitioner complains that his rights under Morrissey v.

Brewer

, 408 U.S. 471, 488-89 (1972) were violated when the state

failed to give him notice of evidence it sought to use to deny him

post-revocation incarceration at an ISF. As the U.S. Supreme Court

has made c lear since M eachum v. Fano

, 427 U.S. 215, 224 (1976),

however, no due process rights arise in respect to a state’s choice

of incarceration facility, even though “the degree of confinementin one prison may be quite different from that in another.”

Accordingly, the state’s failure to give notice of evidence it

would use to choose the incarceration facility does not raise any

due process constitutional concerns.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Respondent’s

motion to supplement the record is DENIED.

AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**




**PURSUANT
      TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**









I,
      Peter
      J. Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Amendment No. 1 to
      the
      quarterly report of Prestige Brands International, LLC on Form 10-Q/A for the
      period ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable, and that
      information contained in such quarterly report fairly presents in all material
      respects the financial condition and results of operations of Prestige Brands
      International, LLC.




Date:January
              12, 2006
            **/s/
                P****eter****J. A****nderson**Name:Peter
                J. AndersonTitle:Chief
                Financial Officer
# Attachment N:

Sample WasteWise Challenge Registration FormsSUSTAINABLE ATHLETICS CHALLENGE

REGISTRATION FORM

Organization Information

Organization Name:

Athletic Division:

Athletic Conference:

Game Information

Game Date:

Opponent:

Stadium Name:

Stadium Capacity:

Waste Reduction Plans

Please check the boxes to indicate what areas you intend to target with your waste reduction

activities.

Pre

- Game Events

Parking Lot / Tailgating

Back

- of

- House / Retail / Concessions

Concourse

Fan Seating Area

- During Game

Fan Seating Area

- After Game

Other

SubmitSUSTAINABLE ATHLETICS CHALLENGE

RE PORT ING FORM

Please enter the weight of materials in the appropriate fields below. Actual weights should always be

used. If actual weights are impossible to obtain, weight estimates may be substituted following the

process outlined in the rules here. If you do not have weight data for a particular material, please leave

that field blank.

Official Attendance : people

Weights

Please enter the weights of materials that were collected in the appropriate fields below. If you

do not have weight data for a particular material, leave that field blank.

Paper: pounds

Bottles and Cans: pounds

Corrugated cardboard: pounds

Mixed Recyclable Materials: pounds (do not include weights reported in

other material categories)

Organics: pounds

Composting: pounds

Donation: pounds

Trash: pounds

Additional Comments

Please enter any additional information that you would like to share about your activities in the

box(es) below.

Pre

- Game Events

Parking Lot / Tailgating

Back

- of

- House / Retail / ConcessionsSUSTAINABLE ATHLETICS CHALLENGE

Concourse

Fan Seating Area

- During Game

Fan Seating Area

- After Game

Other Activities

Save
# C_2004106EN.01001702.xml

| 30.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/17

---

ORDER OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

ORDER OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

(Fifth Chamber)

of 9 March 2004

in Case C–159/03 P: Jan Pflugradt v European Central Bank (1)

1

(‘Appeal - Staff of the ECB - Formal warning - Preparatory act - Act which does not adversely affect an official - Inadmissible’)

(2004/C 106/30)

Language of the case: German

In Case C-159/03 P: Jan Pflugradt, agent of the European Central Bank, residing in Frankfurt am Main (Germany), represented by N. Pflüger, with an address for service in Luxembourg, brought an appeal against the order of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Fifth Chamber), Case T-82/03 Pflugradt v ECB [2003] ECR I-0000, seeking to have that order set aside, the other party to the proceedings being: the European Central Bank (Agents: T. Gilliams, N. Urban and B. Wägenbaur), with an address for service in Luxembourg, the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: C. Gulmann, President, A La Pergola (Rapporteur), R. Silva de Lapuerta, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; R Grass, Registrar, made an order on 9 March 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

Pflugradt

ECB

| 1) | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1)

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2) | Mr Pflugradt is order to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Mr Pflugradt is order to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 135 of 7.6.2003

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

July 24, 2012

t0716

Order 

July 24, 2012

144760

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144760

COA: 300475

Wayne CC: 10-000172-FC

TERRANCE RICHARDSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 12, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO.

Leslie C. Abbott

Senior Attorney

1901 L Street, N.W.

– Suite 640

Washington, D.C. 20036

(202) 263

- 628 5

(202) 263

- 6291 Fax

L eslie. abbott @wnco.com

_______________________________________________________________________________

May 4, 2012

Via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of AirTran Airways for Renewal of Exemption

Authority ( MKE

- CUN); Dock et DOT

- OST

- 20 10

- 0146

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

This letter is to confirm that AirTran Airways (“AirTran”) has polled all carriers on

the service list attached to the above

- referenced Application

, and all carriers responded

that they have no objections. Accordingly, AirTran requests that the exemption authority

renewal specified in the A pplication be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________ Leslie C. Abbott

cc: Susan Kurland, DOT

Paul Gretch, DOT

Brian Hedberg, DOT

Brett Kruger, DOT
July 7 , 2015

M r. R ichard Wildman

1634 Monroe Avenue

Rochester, NY 14618

Dear Mr. Wildman :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your June 26 th 2015, exemption request on behalf of Agrinetix, LLC into the

public docket (No. FAA

- 2015

- 2482 ), but we are unable to process your request any fur ther.

The information you sent does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed).

For us to consider the request any further, you mus t send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, th e extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption

woul d provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to suppo rt your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (2 02) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Mr. Sha M. GarvinRegional Administrator

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III

1650 Arch Street (Mail Code: 3RAOO)

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029

Dear Mr. Garvin:

Enclosed for your approval is a revision to Pennsylvania’s State Implementation Plan

(SIP) concerning amendments to 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 123 (relating to general

provisions; and standards for contaminants). The submittal includes two hard copies and one

compact disk of a final-form rulemaking that adds provisions under § 123.14 for the control of emissions of particulate matter (PM) from the operation of outdoor wood-fired boilers. The

final-form rulemaking also adds six new terms and definitions under § 121.1 (relating to definitions).

This SIP revision submission includes the final-form rulemaking notice published in the

Pennsylvania Bulletin on October 2, 2010 (40 Pa.B. 5571-5578), documentation of the public

participation process including proof of public notice, and the Department of Environmental

Protection’s public comment and response document.

Should you have any questions regarding this SIP revision, please contact Joyce E. Epps,

Director, Bureau of Air Quality, by e-mail atjeepps@state.pa.us or by telephone at

717-787-9702.

Sincerely,

John Hanger

Secretary

RECEiVED

Enclosures

2S

DW’IS’on

ç.pPOO)

An Equal Opportunity Employer www.dep.state.pa.us Printed on Recycled Paper
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Western Acquisition Ventures Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2021, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, William Lischak, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: March 30, 2022 | By: | /s/ William Lischak          
|-------------------- | --- | -----------------------------
|                     |     | William Lischak              
|                     |     | Chief Financial Officer      
|                     |     | (Principal Financial Officer)