alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MFA INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Robert L. JONES, d/b/a Pickup and Truck Salvage, Appellee.

No. 53164.

Court of Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1.

Aug. 5, 1980.

Released for Publication by Order of Court of Appeals Sept. 4, 1980.

*473Richard A. Pyle, Eufaula, for appellant.

Gary P. Snow, Holdenville, for appellee.

BOX, Judge:

An appeal by the plaintiff below from a judgment against it on the defendant’s cross-petition.

The plaintiff, MFA Insurance Company, a Missouri corporation, filed a replevin action against the defendant, Robert L. Jones, d/b/a Pickup and Truck Salvage, to recover a 1977 Kawasaki motorcycle. Jones entered an answer denying all allegations of MFA, except that he was in possession of the motorcycle. Jones also filed a cross-petition by which he sought to recover costs of storage and safekeeping. The matter was tried to the court, and the court granted possession of the motorcycle to MFA on its petition. It entered judgment for Jones against MFA on his cross-petition in the sum of $1,608. MFA appeals the judgment against it on Jones’ cross-petition.

The judgment was entered on December 7, 1978. On that same day MFA’s motion for a new trial was overruled. MFA filed a petition in error in the Oklahoma Supreme Court on January 8, 1979. The record designated on appeal contained no transcript of record, and no narrative statement was submitted. See 12 O.S.1971, Ch. 15, App. 2, Rule 1.22.

In reviewing a judgment of a trial court, error is never presumed. It must be affirmatively demonstrated by the complaining party. *Batts v. Carter,*Okl., 312 P.2d 472; *Smith v. Smith,*Okl.App., 579 P.2d 841, 842. It is the duty of the appealing party to cause to be prepared and filed a sufficient trial court record to show cause for reversal at the appellate level. *King v. Sherrill,*Okl., 496 P.2d 803, 804. Since the only record before this Court fails to show affirmatively that the trial court erred, we must presume no prejudicial error was committed. *Pracht v. Oklahoma State Bank,*Okl., 592 P.2d 976, 978. The record before us consists only of the pleadings, motions, court minutes, and journal entry.

We note that the Appellee, Jones, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. One of the grounds for dismissal was that there was an insufficient record before the court to show grounds for reversal. We find it unnecessary to address this motion under our disposition of the case. We affirm and assess the costs of this appeal to the Appellant.

AFFIRMED.

REYNOLDS, P. J., and ROMANG, J., concur.
MCNAB CREEK GOLD CORP.
A Nevada Corporation

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth G. Townsend, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the amended quarteley report
    on Form 10-QSB of McNab Creek Gold Corp. for the period ended June 30, 2006
    (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|2. | the information contained in
    the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of McNab Creek Gold Corp.                                                                        



|Dated November 27, 2006 | /s/ Kenneth G. Townsend                  
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------------
|                        |                                          
|                        |                                          
|                        | Kenneth G. Townsend,                     
|                        | President and Chief Executive
    Officer
|                        | And Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8596]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee and the 
Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee 
and the Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee that had been scheduled to 
meet on April 12, 2012 from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. at the Washington State 
Parks office, 270 9th Street NE., East Wenatchee, WA has been replaced 
with an open public meeting. During this public meeting information 
will be shared about the Forest Service Chief's 10-Year Stewardship 
Challenge, Yakima River Basin Integrated Water Resource Management 
Plan, Holden Mine Remediation progress, and an update on the Forest 
Plan Revision. This meeting is open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
meeting to Clint Kyhl, Designated Federal Official, USDA, Okanogan-
Wenatchee National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington 
98801, phone 509-664-9200.

    Dated: April 3, 2012.
Clinton Kyhl,
Designated Federal Official, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2012-8596 Filed 4-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

 Agricultural Marketing Service 

NOTICE OF SALE OF COTTON 

FOR RELEASE AT 12:00 P.M. CT U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of cotton. T

sold on The Seam dated October 10th, 2023. 

Offer No. Catalog Location Pounds Sold Bales Sold Price Sold (per pound) CC

TS1154627 AR 63,055 135 $0.8250 $

TS1154628 AR, LA, & TN 5,315 11 $0.2511 $
| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of                15 (d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| December                6, 2005 |                                                                                                                                                |                                       |
|---------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                            |                                                                                                                                                |
|                       |                                                                                                                                           |                                  |
|                            |                                                                                                                                           | /s/ Harvey                W. Schiller |
|                            | Harvey                  W. SchillerChairman                  of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(Principal                  Executive Officer) |

----
CCC COMMODITY INVENTORY

As of January 31, 2019

OUTSTANDING UNDER LOAN CCC-OWNED

CY 2016 CY 2017 CY 2018 INVENTORY 2/

(Million Units Except as Noted) (Actual Units)

BUTTER (LB) - - - 0.0

CHEESE (LB) - - - 0.0

NONFAT DRY MILK (LB) - - - 0.0

BARLEY (BU) 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0

CORN (BU) 0.0 3.1 757.5 0.0

OATS (BU) 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0

SORGHUM (BU) 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0

SOYBEANS (BU) 0.0 0.1 177.0 0.0

WHEAT (BU) 0.1 0.3 45.0 0.0

RICE (CWT) 0.0 0.0 30.0 0.0

REFINED SUGAR (Mil. Lbs.) 0.0 116.0 923.5 0.0

 IN-PROCESS BEET 0.0 0.0 1,053.0 0.0

RAW CANE SUGAR (Mil. Lbs.) 0.0 0.0 1,406.6 0.0

 IN-PROCESS CANE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

HONEY (Mil. Lbs.) 0.0 0.0 6.2 0.0

PEANUTS (tons) 0.0 0.0 1,913,550.0 121,684.76

CANOLA SEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 1,216.0 0.0

CRAMBE (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

FLAXSEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 33.0 0.0

MUSTARD SEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 4.0 53.0 0.0

RAPESEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

SAFFLOWER SEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

SESAME SEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

SUNFLOWER SEED (OIL) (CWT) 1/ 0.0 20.0 357.0 0.0

SUNFLOWER SEED (Other) (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 56.0 0.0

DRY PEAS (CWT) 1/ 0.0 3.0 751.0 0.0

LENTILS (CWT) 1/ 0.0 7.0 697.0 0.0

CHICKPEAS (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 891.0 0.0

UPLAND COTTON (BALE) 200 400 4,494,900 0

ELS COTTON (BALE) 0 2,300 178,400 0

1/ Minor Oilseeds & Pulses are in thousand units.

Report Completed: February 12, 2019

2/ CCC acquired 7,099.63 tons peanuts in August from July maturing loans, for a total beginning inventory of 7,099.63 

tons. CCC acquired another 59,478.73 tons of peanuts in September due to August maturing loans. CCC acquired 

another 21,325.03 tons of peanuts in October due to September maturing loans. CCC acquired another 33,781.37 tons of 

peanuts in November due to October maturing loans.This brings total peanut inventory to 121,684.76 tons.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2231

LESLIE A. MEYERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-99-2083-WMN)

Submitted: January 23, 2001 Decided: February 7, 2001

Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald D. Hecht, Leslie L. Gladstone, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland,

for Appellant. Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Ariana

Wright Arnold, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte J.

Hardnett, Acting General Counsel, John M. Sacchetti, Associate General Counsel, Office of Program Litigation, Ejike H. Obineche, Office of the General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Leslie A. Meyers appeals the district court’s order affirming

the Commissioner’s decision denying Meyers’ application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s order adopting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. We find that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) properly

evaluated Meyers’ allegations of pain, gave due consideration to

Meyers’ treating physician’s opinion, and asked a proper hypothetical that set out Meyers’ circumstances and limitations as found by

the ALJ. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 50482 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
PHILLIP SCHUESSLER, also known as Philip Martin Schuessler
,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:17

- CR

- 697

- 1

Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Phillip Schuessler has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California
, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Schuessler h a s not filed a respon se. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set f orth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 1, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-50482 Document: 00515435891 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/01/2020No. 19

- 50482

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. The judgment is REFORMED to provide for a concurrent five

- year term of supervised release as to count two , as the district court imp osed in its oral
pronouncement. See United States v. Hernandez

- Guevara , 162 F.3d 863, 877

- 78 (5th Cir. 1998) ; United States v. Mireles , 471 F.3d 551, 557

- 58 (5th Cir. 2006). Case: 19-50482 Document: 00515435891 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/01/2020
jj^-'. _ ^^s 3 

DESARROUO INTEGRADO, S. A DE C. V. 

1o whom it may concern; 

This tetter ts to certify that of this date in ttie record books of the cwnpany, the 

reg^ter ^arehokJers of 100% of rts i^ued and paid in capital of D^arrotlo 

Integracto, S. A de C. V. are the following mexican citJ^er^: 

Roberto Zambrano Villarreal 

Maurkrio Zambrano Villarreal 

David Zamt^ano Villarreal 

Daniel Zambrano Viltarreaf 

Norma Zambrarro de Fernandez 

GulHermo Manuel Zambfano Vtllarreat 

Laura Zambrano de Kane 

Andres Zambrarw Villarreal 

Rodolfo Zambrano Villanreal 

Integrado, S. A de C. V. is a company irtcorp^^ated under the 

Mexico s laws ttie 5* of ftovember 1975 and registered under No. 2, page 295, 

vdume 213, book Ho. 3 at the Registers Office tn Mor^rr^ , N.L. M^xkx) the 

7* of January of 1976. 

Monterrey, N.L. as of the 27^ of November of 2009 

Desarrollo Integrack)^ S. A. de C. V. 

GuilteriTid Marvttel Zambrano Villarreal
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-20523

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN JESUS GONZALEZ-LOZOYA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-98-CR-5-1

- - - - - - - - - -

February 22, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Jesus Gonzalez-Lozoya appeals the sentence he received

after pleading guilty to being an alien, previously deported

after commission of an aggravated offense, who reentered the

United States without permission of the Attorney General. 

Gonzalez-Lozoya argues that the district court erred in failing

to make a downward departure. After reviewing the sentencing

hearing and the arguments on appeal, we find that the district

court did not misapprehend its authority to depart but that, 
No. 98-20523

-2-

instead, its refusal to depart was an exercise of discretion

which this court lacks jurisdiction to review on appeal. See

United States v. Burleson, 22 F.3d 93, 95 (5th Cir. 1994); United

States v. DiMarco, 46 F.3d 476, 477 (5th Cir. 1995).

APPEAL DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report (the "Report") of Rand Logistics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: February 11, 2011/s/ Joseph W. McHugh, Jr.Joseph W. McHugh, Jr.Chief Financial Officer
[Nos. 13924-7-III; 14252-3-III.

Division Three.

June 13, 1996.]

#### *In the Matter of the Application for Relief from Personal Restraint of*Leo Adrian Amundson, *Petitioner.*The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Leo Adrian Amundson, *Appellant.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for Oka-nogan County, No. 93-1-00095-1, John G. Burchard, Jr., J., entered March 24, 1994 and September 21, 1993. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Munson, J., concurred in by Schultheis, A.C.J., and Thompson, J.
AFS

- 13

- 302

- E May 11, 2013

E xemption No. 13 4N

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2001

- 9410

Maj. Alan W. Myrick

Chief , Aircrew Procedures

Department of the Air Force

6500 South MacArthur Boulevard

Oklahoma City, OK 73169

Dear Maj. Myrick :

This letter is to inform you that we have g ranted your petition to extend Exemption

No. 134 , as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect , and lists

the conditions and limitations

.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated Mar ch 20, 2013

, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of the U.S. Air Force ( USAF ) for an extension of Exemption No. 134 , as amended

. That exemption from § 91.159 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows the USAF to

conduc t non

- training photographic reconnaissance missions that require flying a series of

tracks at a constant altitude under visual flight rules, without maintaining the appropriate

cruising alti tudes required by § 91.159.

In your petition, you indicate that t here has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register beca use the requested extension of the exemption would not set a

precedent, and any delay in acting on this pe tition would be detrimental to the USAF.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 1 3 4

, as

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore,

under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. § 40109, which the FAA Administrator has

delegated to me, I grant your petition. Notwithstanding the provision s of the exemption, the

pilot of an aircraft engaged in the above operations is not relieved of the responsibility to see

and avoid other aircraft as required by other provisions of the regulations.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 134 , as amended, to

September 30, 201 8

, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Deputy Director, Flight Standards

Service
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

DERRICK L. JONES , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 1034

[ October 12, 2022 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 5 0 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barbara R. Duffy

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 06

- 2012

- 018500

- CF

- 10A

.
Derrick L. Jones, Pahokee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed. See Hammond v. Sta te , 34 So. 3d 58, 60

- 61 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (where a movant files an initial brief, and fails to establish that the claim can be amended in good faith, this court will not remand the matter).

C ONNER , F ORST and A RTAU , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Ratio of Wood Preserving Industry to All Industry Re

0.00000.00010.00020.00030.00040.00050.00060.00070.0008

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 

Year

Ratio

TotaRelTotaRel
Specialty 1400 Independence Avenue,SW.

Crops Room 1536-S, STOP 0240

Program Washington, DC 20250-0240

February 12, 2020

 AMENDMENT NO. 1

COMMODITY SPECIFICATION

CANNED VEGETABLES – January 2020

The purpose of this amendment is to revise and update this commodity specification, specifically:

• Revise secondary packaging requirements

• Revise washed drained weight procedures for Cream of Mushroom Soup

Strikethroughs are deletions and additions to this commodity specification are shown in blue

Secondary Containers (tray and case) for Commercial Labels

2. Case flaps, gaps, and other openings may not exceed 1 inch and must be fully glued or sealed 

with tape. If tape is used in lieu of glue, it must be clear and of commercially acceptable width 

and strength. The tape must extend at least two inches down the sides or ends.

Alternate packaging for canned products the secondary container - tray(s) or case.

• Cases may have an opening that exceeds 1 inch if it is completely 

stretch- wrapped. The stretch-wrap may also have reasonably sized 

openings to allow for cooling.

• This alternate packaging requirement must be able to withstand 

normal handling, shipping, and storage and be acceptable to the 

common carrier

Soups

Cream of Mushroom, Condensed

2. Sodium content – (condensed) will have a maximum of 410 mg per 1/2 cup serving.

3. Formulation requirements:

The WDW percentages of ingoing mushrooms per batch will average 8.0 percent or more by 

weight for the lot average with no individual batch percentage falling under 7.0 percent by 

weight. The percentages of mushrooms will be determined by SCI reviewing the vendor’s 

product formula and relevant individual batch records.

After reconstituting and heating the soup (per label instructions):

a. The mushrooms will be fairly tender and will not be excessively tough, rubbery, or soft. And 

there will be some visible pieces of mushrooms that are 3/16 inches in diameter or larger.
7. Washed drained weight (WDW):

See formulation requirements for mushroom percentages required.

Be advised all soups will be moved to a stand-alone specification soon.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.