alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 475 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 475

  Recognizing and celebrating the origin and purposes of Constitution 
                                 Week.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 19, 2002

Mr. Smith of Texas (for himself and Mr. Chabot) submitted the following 
   concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing and celebrating the origin and purposes of Constitution 
                                 Week.

Whereas September 17th marks the anniversary of the signing of the United States 
        Constitution;
Whereas this date was designated as Constitution Day until 1952 when Congress 
        changed the name of that date to Citizenship Day;
Whereas the National Society Daughters of the American Revolution felt this 
        change of emphasis away from the Constitution was not warranted, and in 
        1953 they passed a resolution asking Congress to restore Constitution 
        Day;
Whereas in 1955 Daughters of the American Revolution President General Gertrude 
        Carraway met with then Vice President Richard Nixon and Senators Lyndon 
        Johnson and William Knowland and presented the case for a Constitution 
        Week;
Whereas Senator Knowland introduced a resolution requesting and authorizing 
        President Eisenhower to proclaim September 17-23 as Constitution Week;
Whereas the resolution was passed by Congress, and President Eisenhower issued a 
        proclamation for Constitution Week but was reluctant to establish it as 
        an annual celebration;
Whereas at the urging of the Daughters of the American Revolution, Senator 
        Knowland introduced a joint resolution on January 5, 1956, urging the 
        President to annually designate September 17-23 as Constitution Week;
Whereas this resolution was adopted and signed into law on August 2, 1956;
Whereas thus conceived and instituted, Constitution Week is now an annual event 
        commemorating and celebrating the Constitution; and
Whereas President George W. Bush stated, ``We each should serve our Nation by 
        actively supporting and shaping our Government's institutions, by 
        working together to build strong communities, and by loving our 
        neighbors . . . doing this will ensure that the American dream will 
        become real for every willing citizen, and, in fulfilling this call 
        together, we will honor the spirit of our powerful and enduring 
        Constitution'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress recognizes and celebrates the origin and purposes of 
Constitution Week.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  October 14, 2008
    
    /s/ Crit S. DeMentName:
    Crit S. DeMentTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Solo Cup Company (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the thirteen weeks ended September 27, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert D. Koney, Jr., as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Robert D. Koney, Jr.
|Robert D. Koney, Jr.    
|Chief Financial Officer 
|November 12, 2009
National UAS Solutions, LLC

104 Raphael Drive Lafay ette, LA 70508 June 3, 2015 Exemption No. 11570 Regulatory

Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0347
U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room W12

- 140 1200 New Jersey

Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 **Re: Request to amend Exemption No. 11570 to allow National UAS Solutions, LLC**  **to add the DJI Phantom 3**  **, DJI Inspire**  **and the DJI S1000 s**  **UAS platforms under**  **the same direction and limitations as provided with in Exemption No. 11570,**  **docket #FAA** 
**- 2015** 
**- 0347, approved on May 13, 2015.** 
Dear Sir or Madam, National UAS Solutions, LLC was issued an exemption under Section 333 of the “FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 ” numbered 11570 for the purpose of gath ering aerial data using the DJ I Phantom 2 Vision+ sUAS. Since the exemption was granted, National UAS Solutions, LLC has determined the need to add the DJ I Phantom 3, DJ I Inspire and the DJ I S1000 quadcopter in order to remain competitive and enhance serv ices afforded our customers. The airworthiness of the DJIS1000 was previously determined by the FAA in Exemption No. 11156 (Total Safet y U.S. Inc.), Exemption No 11158 (Team 5, LLC), and Exemption No. 11184 (L ow Country

RC) . The airworthiness of the DJ I Inspire was previously determined by the FAA in exemption # 11301 (Gulf Coast Unmanned Aerial Services, LLC). Since the Phantom 3 is essentially

the Phantom 2 Vision+ upgraded with a more professional camera s ys tem, it is National UAS Solutions, LLC’s bel ief that they are materiall y alike. The DJ I Phantom 3, Inspire and S1000 will all have a gross weight under 55 pounds, forward speeds of less than 50 knots and an altitude restriction of under 400 feet. These sUAS’s will be operated in accordance with the limitations and restrictions enumerated in Exemption No. 11570 alread y granted National UAS Solutions, LLC.Because the requested amendment would not set any precedent or otherwise raise an y n ovel issue, and because the addition of these sUAS platfor ms to our fleet will not materially affect our alread y granted petition No. 11570 in any way , and because National UAS Solutions, LLC seeks to begin these operations without delay, National UAS Solutions, LLC respectfully requests the FAA to determine that good cause exists to dispense with publication of the summary of this petition in the Federal Register and grant the requested amendment expeditiously b y summary means. Thank you for your kind consideration in the granting of this amendment. Best regard s,

Charles R. O’Neal, Jr. President/CEO National UAS Solutions, LLC Lafay ette, Louisiana 70508 337.288.1793 coneal@nationaluassolutions.com
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of West coast Car Company
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31,2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Alex Ferries, Chief Executive Officer of the small business issuer,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the small
business issuer.



/s/ Alex Ferries
-----------------------
Alex Ferries
Chief Financial Officer

OCT 11, 2006
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 26, 2011

h0919 

# Order

September 26, 2011

143010

HAROLD STERN, as Conservator for MAXWELL K. UNGER and TYLER B. UNGER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 143010 COA: 295487 STEVEN MARJIEH, Oakland CC: 2009-102749-CH Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 29, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 35.1





Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.








This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 19, 2022 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-1 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.  I further certify as follows:





1. I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 19, 2022 through December 31, 2022, and its performance under the Agreement.





2. To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.








AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.





By:/s/ Connie CoffeyDated:March 3, 2023Connie CoffeyExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
1

original plan of training the kurdistan pilots towards FAA Certificates has been cancelled by the KRG-MOI 

office. We explained we are close to approvals but they stated that they can not wait any longer and are 

obtaining Iraqi C of A's for the aircraft and will utilize Iraqi qualified pilots for their operation. 

This is upsetting as we put a lot of work in this and tried to accommodate training them towards US 

Certificates. 

At this time Flight Trails Helicopters, Inc. would like to cancel the request for petition and thank you for all of 

your help in working towards this goal. 

Thank you again for your help, 

Terry Tyner 

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:10 PM, <Will.Gonzalez@faa.gov> wrote: 

Hi Terry,
720 S. Colorado Blvd
Penthouse North
Denver, CO 80246
Tel: +1 (334) 578 2900

Fax: + 1 (334) 460 8111 www.unmannedexperts.com

E

- Mail: operations@unmannedexperts.com

July 4 , 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room w12

- 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590



## Application to Amend Section 333 Exemption No. 11436 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0193

Petitio ner: Unmanned Experts, Inc. Drew A. Jurkofsky, CKO
720 S. Colorado Blvd , PH North Denver, CO 80246
Cell: 970

- 237

- 1902
Email: drew.j@unmannedexperts.com
Website: www.unmannedexperts.com

Dear Sir or Madam

,

By letter from the FAA dated April 27, 2015, an exemption was granted to Unmanned Experts for relief under Section 333. That letter was marked Section 333 Exemption No. 11436 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0193.

Unmanned Experts hereby requests that the exemption so granted, be now amended to include the Turbo Ace

Matrix and Xact Sense Max

- 8 multi

- rotor aircraft.

Attached are the Aircraft Flight Manuals for the Turbo Ace Matrix and Xact Sen se Max

- 8 aircraft. They contain the following:

• General Information

• Operating Limitations

• Normal Procedures

• Emergency Procedures

• Aircraft and Systems Description

• Handling, Service and Maintenance ProceduresExemption s / Rule Making

T he findings, rationale, conclusions and conditio ns contained in the FAA ’ s Exemption No. 11436 apply to this application to include the Turbo Ace Matrix and Xact Sense Max

- 8 models in Exemption No. 11436.

Thank you for your consideration of this important request. Please advise us of any addit iona l information that is required.

Very Resp ectfully

,

Drew A. Jurkofsky

C hief Knowledge Officer Unmanned Experts, Inc.

Unmanned Experts PROPRIETARY Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Refund Processing Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, May 3, 2012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Refund Processing Communications Project Committee will be held Thursday, May 03, 2012 at 2 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Ms. Ellen Smiley. For more information please contact Ms. Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: March 28, 2012.

Louis Morizio,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2012-8413 Filed 4-6-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC

Friends of East Hampton Airport, Inc. et al., Complainant,


### v. FAA Docket No. 16·15

- 02 Town of East Hampton, NY Respondent.



### NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME This matter is before the Federal Aviat ion Administration (FAA) based on t he above

referenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally AssistedAirport Enforcement Proceedings, 

### 14 CFR Part 16 (Rules ofPractice). Pursuant to the Rules of Practice, Section 16.ll(a), the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to February 19 , 2016. An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case.

Director, Office of Airport Compliance

and Management Analysis

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY tha t on November



# (}
**5,** I caused to be p laced in the United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) , a true copy of the Notice of Extension of Time to February 4 , 2016, for FAA Docket 16-15

- 02 addressed to: Complainant Le onard D
. Kirsch Shelley A. Ewalt McBreen & Kopko 500 N. Broadway , 

### Suite 129 Jericho, NY 1 1 753 lkirsch @,mklawnyc.com sewalt @ mklawnyc. com Counsel for Respondent Elizabeth Vail Town Attorney Town ofEast Hampton 159 Pantigo Road East Hampton, NY 1193 7 EVail@EHamptonNY.Gov W
. Eric Pil sk Catherine van Heuven Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP 1 001 Connecticut Ave. , NW, S ui te 800 Washington, DC 20036 epilsk (W, kap lankirsch.com cvanheuven @,kaplankirsch
. com Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAA Airport Comp liance Divi sion (AC0- 1 00) FAA Eastern Regional Office (AEA-600)

Office ofAirport Compliance and, Management Analysis
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francesco R. CAMPISI, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 81SA151.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

July 26, 1982.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 30, 1982.

J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Hennessey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Mary J. Mullarkey, Sol. Gen., Mary E. Ricketson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-ap-pellee.

J. Gregory Walta, Colorado State Public Defender, James England, Deputy State Public Defender, Denver, for defendant-appellant.

*1054HODGES, Chief Justice.

The defendant, Francesco R. Campisi, was convicted by an Adams County jury of second-degree murder. Section 18-3-103, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8).1 During trial, defense counsel sought to present evidence that the defendant’s ability to form the required mental state for second-degree murder was impaired due to intoxication. The trial court denied the defendant’s request to present this evidence to the jury on the basis that section 18-3-103(2), C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8), clearly establishes that voluntary intoxication is not a defense to second-degree murder, and because the defense failed to show that this provision is unconstitutional. During the instruction phase of the trial, the court refused the defendant’s tendered instruction concerning intoxication and subsequently instructed the jury that “diminished responsibility due to ... self-induced intoxication is not a defense to murder in the second degree.”

In this appeal, the defendant challenges the constitutionality of section 18-3-103(2), C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8), along with the court’s instruction to the jury that voluntary intoxication is not a defense to the crime charged.

Defendant’s argument that section 18-3-103(2), C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8) is violative of the Due Process Clause of both the United States and the Colorado Constitutions has been repeatedly rejected by this court. *See People v. Morgan,*Colo., 637 P.2d 338 (1981); *People v. White,*199 Colo. 82, 606 P.2d 847 (1980); *People v. DelGuidice,*199 Colo. 41, 606 P.2d 840 (1980). It is settled law in Colorado that section 18-3-103(2) is constitutional.

Defendant also argues that the trial court erred by instructing the jury that voluntary intoxication is not a defense to second-degree murder. Again, this contention assails previously established law in Colorado. *See People*v. *Morgan, supra; People v. DelGuidice, supra.*The defendant’s argument here, accordingly, must fail.

Judgment affirmed.

1

. Section 18-3-103, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8), reads:

> *Murder in the second degree.*(1) A person commits the crime of murder in the second degree if:

> (a) He causes the death of a person knowingly, but not after deliberation.

> (2) Diminished responsibility due to lack of mental capacity or self-induced intoxication is not a defense to murder in the second degree.

> (3) Murder in the second degree is a class 2 felony.
ENERGY CONSULTING

50-74% Penetration

Below 10% Penetration 

10-50% Penetration

75-100% Penetration

Market Penetration By State

(10% Ethanol Blends as Share of 2007/2008/2009 State Gasoline Sales)

100%

100%

95%

90%

95%

95%

20%

85%

80%

80%

80%

75%

77%

75%

70% 70%

65%

60%

75%

60%

55%

55%

55%

50%

50%

45%

42%

40%

40%

40%

25%

30%

12%

10%

4%

8%

7%

7%

5%

5%

0%

3%

3%

1%

3%

2%

2%

7%

2%

Update: North American BioEthanol Database Service, Revised March 2010

Alaska – 10%

Hawaii – 95%

45%

Note: 2007 Market Percentage has no outline, 2008 circled, 2009 in Square 

60%

95%

60%

70%

45% 35%

35%

75%

85%

55%

35%

35%

35%

60%

50%

55%

70%

75%

85%

85%

90%

85%

50%

85%

90%

95%

60%

85%

75%

40%

30%

20%

25%

45%

85%

85%

85%

35%

85%

95%

75%

55% 55%

70% 65%

70% 70% 80%

80%

80%

80% 80%

55%

55%

65%

60%

85%

85%

90%

80% 85% 90%

75%

60%

75%

95% 90%

90% 90%

90%

85%

75%

60%

65%

90%

80%

55%

60%

Top 5 States By Ethanol 

Sales – 2009

Projected Sales 

Volume (Gallons)

California 1,164,798,159

Texas 797,054,615

Florida 666,380,655

New York 510,639,782

Illinois 465,960,148

Top 5 Ethanol 

Producing 

States 2009

Million 

Gallons/

Year

Iowa 3357

Nebraska 1919

Illinois 1459

Minnesota 1146

South Dakota 881

2007 Baseline Market Share

Assumes 85-90% full operational capacity, 2009

85% 95%

90%
----

|  | 1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act                of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: March 28, 2022 |                          |
|----------------------|-------------------------------|
|                 | /s/ Steven Orbuch             |   |
|                 | Steven Orbuch                 |
|                 | Chief Executive Officer       |
|                 | (Principal Executive Officer) |

----