alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Serge Atlan, certify that: 

  1) I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-QSB of FalconTarget, Inc.;  

  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;  

  3) Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;  

  4) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  

  a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based upon such evaluation; and  

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and  

  5) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):  

  a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information and 

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: May 15, 2008

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan 

    Serge Atlan

    Chairman
EXHIBIT
99.7



CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,
Gadi Levin, Chief Financial Officer of A2Z Smart Technologies Corp. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | a. | the
    Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies
    with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | b. | the
    information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.                                                                             



Date:
March 31, 2022



| | By:    | /s/
    Gadi Levin         
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| | Name:  | Gadi
    Levin             
| | Title: | Chief
    Financial Officer
Gulf Islands National Seashore 

## Birds

The diversity of wildlife habi tats including beaches, dunes, freshwater marshes, maritime forests, and salt marshes has attracted over 300 species of birds. Gulf Islands National Seashore is part of the Great Florida Birding Trail.

From pine warblers to pelicans, you'll find them here. Gulf Islands is a stopover for migrating birds, a place where they can rest and fe ed before continuing on their migration. The freshwater marsh areas provide shelter for clapper rails and s potted sandpipers. A diversity of gulls, terns and various shorebirds can be found year-round.

So grab your binoculars a nd keep your eyes peeled. You never know what you may find!

Did You Know?
Gulf Islands National Seashore's barr ier island habitats, offshore waters, and submerged resources offer a vari ety of recreationa l opportunities for people year-round. Pa g e 1 of 2 Gulf Islands National Seashore - Bi rds (U.S. National Park Service)

8/17/2011 htt p ://www.n p s. g ov/ g uis/naturescience/birds.htmLast Updated: March 01, 2007 at 15:28 MST Pa g e 2 of 2 Gulf Islands National Seashore - Bi rds (U.S. National Park Service)

8/17/2011 htt p ://www.n p s. g ov/ g uis/naturescience/birds.htm
#### Nellie WALLIS and Dan Wallis, Appellants (Defendants), v. Abner LUMAN, Appellee (Plaintiff).

No. 5402.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

Oct. 29, 1980.

Hugh B. McFadden, Jr., Laramie, for appellants.

Harold M, Johnson and Steven D. Noecker, Johnson, Noecker & Noecker, Rawlins, for appellee.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

The Court, after having considered the problem of improper and late filing of Docketing Statements, finds that there is here a violation of Rule 2.03, W.R.A.P., as amended, which amendment was effective July 1, 1980 after notice to all members of the bar and ignorance of the Wyoming Rules of Appellate Procedure is not an excuse, *Crossan v. Irrigation Development Corporation,*Wyo.1979, 598 P.2d 812, and further finds that a reasonable period of transition should be allowed to accustom the bench and bar to the requirements of Rule 2.03, W.R.A.P.

Without establishing any precedent therefor in any future case, it is

ORDERED that appellee’s Motion to Dismiss be, and is, denied.

McCLINTOCK, J., did not participate.
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7419

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. ZANTWAN DEVORRIS WORTHY, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:07-cr-00127-NCT-1)

Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 24, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zantwan Devorris Worthy, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Zantwan Devorris Worthy appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Worthy , No. 1:07-cr-00127-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. July 20, 2009). Further, we deny Worthy’s motion to consolidate. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 122

Encouraging a combination of State legislative efforts and strong health

education programs and activities to discourage smoking in children

and adolescents.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 2, 2001

Mr. NUSSLE submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Encouraging a combination of State legislative efforts and

strong health education programs and activities to discourage smoking in children and adolescents.

Whereas according to the Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention, every day more than 3,000 individuals under

the age of 18 become regular tobacco users;

Whereas tobacco use increases the danger of health problems,

including cancer, heart disease, emphysema, and high

blood pressure; and

Whereas educating people at an early age about the health

risks of tobacco use will encourage them to have healthy

lifestyles as adults: Now, therefore, be it
2

•HCON 122 IH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress encourages—

3 (1) continued efforts by States to—

4 (A) establish and implement laws and reg5 ulations that prohibit the sale of tobacco and

6 tobacco products to and the use of tobacco and

7 tobacco products by individuals under the age

8 of 18; and

9 (B) restrict access to tobacco and tobacco

10 products by individuals under the age of 18;

11 (2) promotion of a healthy lifestyle, by individ12 uals with direct influence on children and adoles13 cents such as parents, teachers, religious leaders,

14 and friends, through education about the use of to15 bacco and tobacco products; and

16 (3) coordination of efforts to promote child and

17 adolescent health through education about the use of

18 tobacco and tobacco products, by States, public and

19 private service organizations, community groups,

20 schools, religious entities, health professionals, and

21 families.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shengtai Pharmaceutical, Inc., the “Company,” on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the “Report,” I, Yongqiang Wang, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 16, 2011
/s/ Yongqiang WangYongqiang WangTitle: Financial Controller(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Solo Cup Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the thirteen weeks ended July 1, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert D. Koney, Jr., as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        
|------------------------
|                        
|/s/ Robert D. Koney, Jr.
|Robert D. Koney, Jr.    
|Chief Financial Officer 
|August 14, 2007
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as

Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc.
(the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 14, 2012



By:

/s/ James A. CalderJames A. CalderChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification is
being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended.
**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Serge Atlan, certify that: 

  1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of INverso Corp.;  

  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  

  3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  

  4) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  

  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; and  

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and  

  5) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  

  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and  

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.  

Date: October 29, 2004 

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan 

    Serge Atlan

    Chairman
United States Court of Appeals 

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted May 9, 2019*

Decided May 13, 2019

Before

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL Y. SCUDDER, Circuit Judge

No. 17‐2942

KENDALL LEE HARLSON,

Plaintiff‐Appellant,

v.

BRANDON KENNEDY McKALLIP,

Defendant‐Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Southern District of Indiana,

Indianapolis Division.

No. 1:17‐cv‐01852‐RLY‐MPB

Richard L. Young,

Judge.

O R D E R

Kendall Harlson sued Brandon McKallip under the Hate Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C.

§ 249, alleging that McKallip trespassed on his property; verbally threatened him; and

struck him with rocks, causing serious bodily injury. The district court screened the

complaint, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and concluded that it lacked subject‐matter

jurisdiction over Harlson’s claims because he did not invoke diversity jurisdiction and

                                                 

* The defendant was not served with process in the district court and is not

participating in this appeal. We have agreed to decide the case without oral argument

because the appeal is frivolous. FED. R. APP. P. 34(a)(2)(A).

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 17‐2942    Page 2

no private civil claim exists under the Hate Crimes Act. The court ordered Harlson to

show cause why the complaint should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Harlson

responded that his claim was for attempted murder and that McKallip should be held

responsible for the substantial injuries that his violent acts caused. The district court

dismissed the complaint for lack of subject‐matter jurisdiction, adding that any criminal

charges had to be brought by the State, and not in a civil case.   

Harlson’s appellate brief recounts the factual circumstances underlying his suit

and generally disputes the district court’s decision, which he reads as wrongly

exculpating McKallip. But the district court ruled only that Harlson cannot sue

McKallip for his conduct in federal court. Federal courts, unlike state courts, may decide

civil cases only if there is a sound basis for federal jurisdiction, such as when the parties

are citizens of different states, see 28 U.S.C. § 1332, or the suit presents a federal

question, see id. § 1331. No grant of federal subject‐matter jurisdiction applies here.

Harlson alleged that both he and McKallip are citizens of Indiana, so the district court

did not have diversity jurisdiction. And federal criminal statutes do not create private

civil claims. Cent. Bank of Denver, N.A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A., 511 U.S.

164, 190–91 (1994). Thus, Harlson may not bring this suit against McKallip in federal

court.   

AFFIRMED
AMS Frozen Pasteurized Whole Eggs Microbial Performance - Fiscal Year: 20201/,2/

Standard Plate Count3/ Total Coliforms4/ Salmonella5/

Contractor

# Lots Produced 

(% of Total)

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit # Positive % Positive

C1 2 (0.2) 0 0 0 0 0 0

C2 164 (16.3) 6 3.66 0 0 0 0

C3 386 (38.4) 13 3.37 0 0 0 0

C4 148 (14.7) 2 1.35 0 0 0 0

C5 304 (30.3) 1 0.33 2 0.66 0 0

Total 1004 (100.0) 22 2.19 2 0.20 0 0.00

1/A full description of the frozen pasteurized whole eggs purchase program specification is available at https://www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food/product-specs#Eggs. 2/Production Dates: October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020. 3/Standard Plate Count Critical Limit: 1,000 CFU/g.

4/Total Coliforms Critical Limit: 10 CFU/g.

5/Salmonella Critical Limit: Positive (+) Result / 25g.
# Fruit and Tree Nut

# Vegetable

# Dairy Grains and Oil Seed

# Livestock Poultry and Fish
NUMBER 13

- 0 8

- 00 471

- CR



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

LAWRENCE BENAVIDEZ

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 117 th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Lawrence Benavidez , by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to

dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

.

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having

dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained,2

an d our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the

31st day of August, 2010

.