alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Thomas Kirchner, certify that: 

  1) I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-QSB of FalconTarget, Inc.;  

  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;  

  3) Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;  

  4) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  

  a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based upon such evaluation; and  

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and  

  5) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):  

  a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlswhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation and  

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: February 14, 2007

By:   /s/   Thomas Kirchner 

    Thomas Kirchner

    Chief Executive Officer
U. S. Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF COTTON

FOR RELEASE AT 1:00 P.M. CT December 12, 2019

USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of Cotton. The cotton bales were sold under 

Invitation 2020U0012 dated December 5, 2019.

Invitation 2020U0012

Catalog 

Lot No. 

Catalog Location Purchaser Pounds Sold Price Sold 

(per Pound) CCC Revenue 

16 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX BRIGHANN MARKETING INC 18,411 0.4004 $ 7,371.76 

21 RAYMONDVILLE, TX BRIGHANN MARKETING INC 6,294 0.4004 $ 2,520.12 

25 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX ALLENBERG COTTON CO. 29,279 0.5501 $ 16,106.38 

 53,984 $ 25,998.26
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 125 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 125

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of H.R. 1830, the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives shall make the following correction: Strike ``National 
Purple Heart Hall of Honor, Inc.'' each place such term appears and 
insert ``National Purple Heart Honor Mission, Inc.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 2, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 125

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

     Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a 
               correction in the enrollment of H.R. 1830.
```
```

Exhibit 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report") by MDwerks Inc. (the "Registrant"), I, Howard Katz,
Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations
         of Registrant.

                                                  /s/ Howard Katz
                                                  ---------------

Dated: May 11, 2006
```
### Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Laqueta Monique Crawford , Appellant

No. 06

- 12

- 00159

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 7th District Court of

Smith County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 007

-

2778

- 06 ). Memorandum Opinion

delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief

Justice Morriss and Justice Carter

participating

.

As stated in the Court ’ s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellant to

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that appellant, Laqueta Monique Crawford , has adequately indicated h er

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECE MBER 12, 2012

BY ORDER OF TH E COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra Autrey, Clerk
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 20, 2021

s0113 

# Order

Clerk January 20, 2021

160827

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 160827

COA: 349268

Mecosta CC: 08

- 006437

- FC

JONATHAN JOSEPH GOOD

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of July 31, 2020, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the

application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals. On

order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is

again considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration, as on leave granted, of (1)

whether the defendant, by filing a Standard 4 supplemental brief on direct ap peal, waived

his right to claim ineffective assistance of appellate counsel in proceedings under MCR

Subchapter 6.500; (2) whether the Court of Appeals decided the defendant’s restitution

and sentencing grounds for relief against him in the prior appeal, M CR 6.508(D)(2); and

(3) if not, whether the defendant is entitled to relief from judgment on these grounds for

relief. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

On remand, while retaining jurisdiction, the Court of Appeals shall remand this

case to the Mecosta Circuit Court and direct that court to appoint counsel to represent the

defendant in the Court of Appeals. Because the State Appellate De fender Office and

Laurel Kelly Young represented the defendant in prior appellate proceedings, neither may

be appointed as appellate counsel.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 14 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 14

   Designating the George C. Marshall Museum and George C. Marshall 
  Research Library in Lexington, Virginia, as the National George C. 
                      Marshall Museum and Library.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2019

 Mr. Cline (for himself, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. Riggleman, and Mr. 
  Griffith) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Designating the George C. Marshall Museum and George C. Marshall 
  Research Library in Lexington, Virginia, as the National George C. 
                      Marshall Museum and Library.

Whereas General George C. Marshall served as Army Chief of Staff during World 
        War II, Special Ambassador to China, Secretary of State, and Secretary 
        of Defense;
Whereas General George C. Marshall was promoted to General of the Army in 1944, 
        one of only five Army five-star generals in the history of the United 
        States;
Whereas General George C. Marshall was awarded the Congressional Gold Medal in 
        1946 for his military strategy and vital role during World War II;
Whereas General George C. Marshall was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1953 for 
        developing the European economic recovery strategy known as the Marshall 
        Plan;
Whereas the George C. Marshall Foundation was established in 1953 and is devoted 
        to preserving the legacy of General George C. Marshall through 
        educational scholarship programs and facilities;
Whereas the George C. Marshall Foundation opened the George C. Marshall Museum 
        and George C. Marshall Research Library in 1964 in Lexington, Virginia, 
        on the post of the Virginia Military Institute, which is the alma mater 
        of General George C. Marshall;
Whereas the George C. Marshall Museum educates the public about the military and 
        diplomatic contributions of General George C. Marshall through extensive 
        exhibits; and
Whereas the George C. Marshall Research Library maintains the most comprehensive 
        collection of records documenting the life and leadership of General 
        George C. Marshall: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress designates the George C. Marshall Museum and George C. 
Marshall Research Library in Lexington, Virginia, as the National 
George C. Marshall Museum and Library.
                                 <all>
```
National Organic Standards Board 

Crops Subcommittee Petitioned Material Discussion Document 

Ammonia Extract 

August 4, 2020 

Summary of Petition: 

The NOSB Crops Subcommittee has determined the petition by TRUE Organic Products, Inc., submitted 

April 14, 2020 to be sufficient and has requested a third-party technical review to aid the 

Subcommittee’s deliberations. The petitioner seeks to prohibit nonsynthetic ammonia extracts for use in 

organic crop production. Specifically, the petition claims that both synthetic and naturally derived forms 

of ammonia can be synthesized or derived and applied to soils in order to meet the nitrogen demand of 

plants. Since nonsynthetic sources of ammonia is not currently permitted by Certifiers and Material 

Review Organizations (but also not explicitly prohibited) in organic production and because such use of 

ammonia is caustic, lowers soil pH, is known to decrease soil biotic activity, and bypasses other soil 

based sources of nitrogen, the petitioner seeks to list ammonia extract on §205.602 of the National List 

as a prohibited nonsynthetic substance. 

Questions: 

The Crops Subcommittee seeks input from the technical review process and from stakeholders to 

answer the following questions: 

1. Is it difficult to distinguish between ammonia derived from natural and synthetic sources (the 

petitioner claims it is difficult and can only be determined by assaying the N isotopes)? In 

addressing this question please consider the distinction between ease of chemical analysis in a 

laboratory and the realities of distinguishing between ammonia sources in a commercial setting 

where fertilizer blending is common. 

2. What are the impacts of ammonia extract application on soil organic matter content, the 

microbiome of the soil, soil faunal diversity and other soil “health” indicators? 

3. Is the description presented in the petition defining ammonia products sufficiently precise to 

classify all ammonia-based products? If not, provide a more precise and inclusive over-arching 

definition. 

4. Are there any other issues with ammonia use in organic crop production that the NOSB should 

be aware of? 

Subcommittee Vote: 

Motion to accept the petitioned material discussion document on ammonia extract 

Motion by: Dave Mortensen 

Seconded by: Jerry D’Amore 

Yes: 6 No: 0 Abstain: 0 Absent: 2 Recuse: 0 

Approved by Jesse Buie, Crop Subcommittee Chair, to transmit to NOP August 4, 2020 

NOSB Proposals and Discussion Documents October 2020 47 of 173
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 16 , 202 3

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 2 3

- 00 102

- CV

GUSTAVO ACOSTA , Appellant

V.

ASHELYE VINGEO , Appellee

On Appeal from the 505 th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 13

- DCV

- 204380

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This appeal is from a n order signed January 23 , 202 3 . The notice of appeal
was filed February 14 , 2023

. No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On March 2 7 , 2023 , notification was transmitted to appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice unless, within fifteen days, appellant2 made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37 .3(b). No response was filed to that notice.

On April 18 , 202 3 , appellant w as ordered to demonstrate he had made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record on or before April 28 , 2023

. In the order, the court notified appellant that failure to comply w ith that requirement would leave the appeal subject to dismissal without further notice for want of prosecution

. Appellant has not filed any response demonstrating he has made arrangements to pay for the record. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Z immerer and Poissant.
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Serge Atlan, certify that: 

  1) I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of FalconTarget, Inc.;  

  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;  

  3) Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;  

  4) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  

  a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based upon such evaluation; and  

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and  

  5) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):  

  a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information and 

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: February 13, 2009

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan 

    Serge Atlan

    Chairman
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 21 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2019 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Secretary of the Senate to make a correction 

in the enrollment of the bill S. 47. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill S. 47, the 

3 Secretary of the Senate shall make the following correc4 tions: 

5 (1) Strike subsection (a) of section 1 and insert 

6 the following: ‘‘(a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be 

7 cited as the ‘John D. Dingell, Jr. Conservation, 

8 Management, and Recreation Act’.’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 21 RDS 

1 (2) Strike the header of section 9003 and insert 

2 ‘‘JOHN S. MCCAIN III 21ST CENTURY CON3 SERVATION SERVICE CORPS ACT’’ (and conform 

4 the table of sections accordingly). 

Passed the House of Representatives February 26, 

2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1 Certificate: 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT OF GRAY PEAKS, INC.**

I, the undersigned, being the one ofthe Co-Chief Executive Officers, respectively, of Gray Peaks, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to the best of his information, knowledge and belief, that (1) the Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)) and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: November 19, 2007 

 

/s/ Tim R. Sensenig             

----
EX-10.21





 EXHIBIT 10.21 

AMENDMENT TO LEASE 

This AMENDMENT TO LEASE (“Amendment”) is made and entered into effective as of Nov. 25, 2013, by and between SF
OFFICE 2, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Landlord”) and LIFE360, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Tenant”). 

R E C I T A L S: 

A. Landlord and Tenant entered into that certain Lease dated as of October __, 2013 (the “Lease”) pursuant to which Landlord
leased to Tenant and Tenant leased from Landlord certain “Premises”, as described in the Lease, in that certain building located at 539 Bryant Street, San Francisco, California 94107. 

B. Except as otherwise set forth herein, all capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the same meaning as such terms have in the
Lease. 
 C. Landlord and Tenant desire to amend the Lease to confirm the commencement and expiration dates of the term, as hereinafter
provided. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals and the mutual covenants contained herein, and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1.
Confirmation of Dates. The parties hereby confirm that the term of the Lease commenced as of Nov. 6, 2013 (the “Lease Commencement Date”) for a term of three (3) years ending on Nov. 30, 2016 (the
“Lease Expiration Date”), unless sooner terminated as provided in the Lease. 
 2. No Further Modification. Except as
set forth in this Amendment, all of the terms and provisions of the Lease shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect. 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as of the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	“Landlord”:
	
	SF OFFICE 2, LLC
	a Delaware limited liability company
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Sean Bannon

	Name:	 	Sean Bannon
	Its:	 	President
	
	“Tenant”:
	
	LIFE360, Inc.
	a Delaware corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Chris Hulls

	Name:	 	Chris Hulls
	Its:	 	CEO
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Alex Haro

	Name:	 	Alex Haro
	Its:	 	CTO