22530 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

TABLE 1 TO § 165.T01–1000—Continued 

• Location: All waters of the East River, bound by the following points: 

40°42′17.04′′ N, 073°59′21.87′′ W; thence to 40°42′12.03′′ N, 

073°59′46.17′′ W; thence to 40°42′24.48′′ N, 074°0′4.09′′ W; thence 

to 40°42′34.19′′ N, 073°59′31.41′′ W; thence back to point of origin. 

6.0 Upper New York Bay, Lower New York Bay 

6.1 Ederle Swim ..................................................................................... • Date: August 18, 2012. 

• Rain Date: August 19, 2012. 

• Enforcement Period: 10 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. 

• Location: All waters of the Hudson River, Upper and Lower New 

York Bays, bound by the following points: 40°42′48.13′′ N, 

074°0′58.74′′ W; thence to 40°42′3.20′′ N, 073°59′54.84′′ W; thence 

to 40°36′32.70′′ N, 074°2′10.73′′ W; thence to 40°28′4.43′′ N, 

073°59′38.14′′ W; thence to 40°28′41.58′′ N, 074°0′55.27′′ W; thence 

to 40°38′38.77′′ N, 074°4′15.05′′ W; thence to 40°43′0.31′′ N, 

074°1′48.11′′ W; thence back to point of origin. 

Dated: March 23, 2012. 

L.L. Fagan, 

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of 

the Port of New York. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9064 Filed 4–13–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2012–0167] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; Fireworks, Hudson River, 

Rhinecliff, NY 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

establish a temporary safety zone on the 

navigable waters of the Hudson River in 

the vicinity of Rhinecliff, NY for a 

fireworks display. This temporary safety 

zone is necessary to protect spectators 

and vessels from the hazards associated 

with fireworks displays. This rule is 

intended to restrict all vessels from a 

portion of the Hudson River before, 

during, and immediately after the 

fireworks event. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before June 15, 2012. 

Requests for public meetings must be 

received by the Coast Guard on or before 

May 7, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2012–0167 using any one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 

5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these four methods. See the 

‘‘Public Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call or email Ensign Kimberly 

Farnsworth, Coast Guard; Telephone 

(718) 354–4163, email 

Kimberly.A.Farnsworth@uscg.mil. If you 

have questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Renee V. 

Wright, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2012–0167), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online (via http:// 

www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online via 

www.regulations.gov, it will be 

considered received by the Coast Guard 

when you successfully transmit the 

comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or 

mail your comment, it will be 

considered as having been received by 

the Coast Guard when it is received at 

the Docket Management Facility. We 

recommend that you include your name 

and a mailing address, an email address, 

or a telephone number in the body of 

your document so that we can contact 

you if we have questions regarding your 

submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will 

then become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu 

select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert 

‘‘USCG–2012–0167’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’ 

box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the 

balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. 

If you submit your comments by mail or 

hand delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit 

comments by mail and would like to 

know that they reached the Facility, 

please enclose a stamped, self-addressed 

postcard or envelope. We will consider 

all comments and material received 

during the comment period and may 

change the rule based on your 

comments. 

Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then 


emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules 22531 

become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2012– 

0167’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the 

‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’ 

column. You may also visit the Docket 

Management Facility in Room W12–140 

on the ground floor of the Department 

of Transportation West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. We have an agreement with 

the Department of Transportation to use 

the Docket Management Facility. 

Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 

Public Meeting 

We do not plan now to hold a public 

meeting. But you may submit a request 

for one using one of the four methods 

specified under ADDRESSES. Please 

explain why you believe a public 

meeting would be beneficial. If we 

determine that one would aid this 

rulemaking, we will hold one at a time 

and place announced by a later notice 

in the Federal Register. 

Basis and Purpose 

The legal basis for the proposed rule 

is 33 U.S.C 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 

195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 

160.5; Public Law 107–295, 116 Stat. 

2064; Department of Homeland Security 

Delegation No. 0170.1. 

This proposed safety zone is 

necessary to ensure the safety of 

spectators and vessels from hazards 

associated with the fireworks display. 

Based on the inherent hazards 

associated with fireworks, the Captain 

of the Port (COTP) New York has 

determined that fireworks launches in 

close proximity to water crafts pose a 

significant risk to public safety and 

property. The combination of increased 

number of recreational vessels, 

congested waterways, darkness 

punctuated by bright flashes of light, 

and debris especially burning debris 

falling on passing or spectator vessels 

has the potential to result in serious 

injuries or fatalities. The proposed 

temporary safety zone will restrict 

vessel movement in the Hudson River 

around the location of the fireworks 

launch platform before, during, and 

after the fireworks display. 

Discussion of Proposed Rule 

Legion Fireworks is putting on a 

fireworks display for a wedding 

ceremony on the waters of the Hudson 

River in the vicinity of Rhinecliff, NY. 

The proposed safety zone is necessary to 

ensure the safety of spectators and 

vessels from hazards associated with the 

fireworks display. 

The fireworks display will occur from 

10 p.m. until 10:15 p.m. In order to 

coordinate the safe movement of vessels 

within the area and to ensure that the 

area is clear of unauthorized persons 

and vessels before, during, and 

immediately after the fireworks launch, 

this zone will be enforced from 9:30 

p.m. until 10:45 p.m. on June 23, 2012. 

The proposed safety zone will include 

all navigable waters of the Hudson River 

within a 165-yard radius of the 

fireworks barge located in approximate 

position 41°55′13.83′′N, 

073°57′18.52′′W, in the vicinity of 

Rhinecliff, NY, approximately 210 yards 

west of Rhinecliff Landing, Rhinecliff, 

NY. Vessels will still be able to transit 

the surrounding area and may be 

authorized to transit through the 

proposed safety zone with the 

permission of the COTP or the 

designated representative. The COTP 

does not anticipate any negative impact 

on vessel traffic due to this proposed 

safety zone. 

This rule is being proposed to provide 

for the safety of life on navigable waters 

during the event and to give the marine 

community the opportunity to comment 

on the proposed zone location, size, and 

length of time the zone will be 

activated. 

The final rule will not be published 

30 days before the event and the 

effective date of this proposed rule as is 

generally required by 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). 

The Coast Guard will accept comments 

on this shortened period and address 

them in the final rule. 

Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on 13 of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

Executive Order 12866 and Executive 

Order 13563 

This rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, as 

supplemented by Executive Order 

13563, Regulatory Planning and Review, 

and does not require an assessment of 

potential costs and benefits under 

section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office 

of Management and Budget has not 

reviewed it under that Order. 

The Coast Guard’s enforcement of this 

proposed safety zone will be of short 

duration, approximately 75 minutes. 

The proposed safety zone will restrict 

access to only a small portion of the 

navigable waters of the Hudson River. 

Vessels will be able to navigate around 

the proposed safety zone. Furthermore, 

vessels may be authorized to transit 

through the proposed safety zone with 

the permission of the COTP or the 

designated representative. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities. This proposed rule will affect 

the following entities, some of which 

may be small entities: The owners and 

operators of vessels intending to transit 

or anchor in a small portion of the 

Hudson River during the effective 

period. 

This proposed safety zone would not 

have a significant economic impact on 

a substantial number of small entities 

for the following reasons: The safety 

zone would be activated and thus 

subject to enforcement, for only 75 

minutes late at night when vessel traffic 

is low. Vessel traffic could pass safely 

around the safety zone. Before the 

activation of the zone, the Coast Guard 

will issue maritime advisories widely 

available to users of the river. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rule would economically affect it. 

Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule so that 


emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
22532 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

they can better evaluate its effects on 

them and participate in the rulemaking. 

If the rule would affect your small 

business, organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact Ensign 

Kimberly Farnsworth, Coast Guard 

Sector New York Waterways 

Management Division; telephone 718– 

354–4163, email 

Kimberly.A.Farnsworth@uscg.mil. The 

Coast Guard will not retaliate against 

small entities that question or complain 

about this proposed rule or any policy 

or action of the Coast Guard. 

Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would call for no 

new collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on State or local governments and 

would either preempt State law or 

impose a substantial direct cost of 

compliance on them. We have analyzed 

this proposed rule under that Order and 

have determined that it does not have 

implications for federalism. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this 

proposed rule would not result in such 

expenditure, we do discuss the effects of 

this rule elsewhere in this preamble. 

Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not cause a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rule is not an economically 

significant rule and would not create an 

environmental risk to health or risk to 

safety that might disproportionately 

affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions that do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. A preliminary 

environmental analysis checklist 

supporting this determination is 

available in the docket where indicated 

under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule 

involves the establishment of a 

temporary safety zone on a portion of 

the Hudson River and appears to be 

categorically excluded, under figure 2– 

1, paragraph (34)(g), the Commandant 

Instruction. 

We seek any comments or information 

that may lead to the discovery of a 

significant environmental impact from 

this proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Marine safety, Navigation (water), 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREA 

1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C 1231; 46 U.S.C 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Public 

Law 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of 

Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

2. Add § 165.T01–0167 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T01–0167 Safety Zone; Fireworks, 

Hudson River, Rhinecliff, NY. 

(a) Regulated Area. The following area 

is a temporary safety zone: All navigable 

waters of the Hudson River within a 

165-yard radius of the fireworks barge 

located in approximate position 

41°55′13.83′′ N, 073°57′18.52′′ W, in the 

vicinity of Rhinecliff, NY, 

approximately 210 yards west of 

Rhinecliff Landing, Rhinecliff, NY. 

(b) Definitions. For purposes of this 

section ‘‘Designated representative’’ is 

any Coast Guard commissioned, 

warrant, or petty officer who has been 

designated by the Captain of the Port 

New York (COTP) to act on the COTP’s 

behalf. 


emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2012 / Proposed Rules 22533 

(c) Effective Period. This rule will be 

effective from 9:30 p.m. to 10:45 p.m. on 

June 23, 2012. 

(d) Regulations. (1) The general 

regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23, 

as well as the following regulations, 

apply. 

(2) No vessels, except for fireworks 

barge and accompanying vessels, will be 

allowed to transit the safety zone 

without the permission of the COTP or 

the designated representative. 

(3) All persons and vessels shall 

comply with the instructions of the 

COTP or the designated representative. 

Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast 

Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing 

light, or other means, the operator of a 

vessel shall proceed as directed. 

(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter 

or operate within the regulated area 

shall contact the COTP or the 

designated representative via VHF 

channel 16 or 718–354–4353 (Sector 

New York command center) to obtain 

permission to do so. 

Dated: March 23, 2012. 

L.L. Fagan, 

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of 

the Port New York. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9007 Filed 4–13–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2011–0353; FRL–9659–2] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Tennessee; 

110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure 

Requirements for the 1997 8–Hour 

Ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

in part, and conditionally approve in 

part, the State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) submission, submitted by the State 

of Tennessee, through the Tennessee 

Department of Environment and 

Conservation (TDEC), to demonstrate 

that the State meets the requirements of 

sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the Clean 

Air Act (CAA or Act) for the 1997 8- 

hour ozone national ambient air quality 

standards (NAAQS). Section 110(a) of 

the CAA requires that each state adopt 

and submit a SIP for the 

implementation, maintenance, and 

enforcement of each NAAQS 

promulgated by the EPA, which is 

commonly referred to as an 

‘‘infrastructure’’ SIP. TDEC certified that 

the Tennessee SIP contains provisions 

that ensure the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS are implemented, enforced, and 

maintained in Tennessee (hereafter 

referred to as ‘‘infrastructure 

submission’’). EPA is proposing to 

conditionally approve sub-element 

110(a)(2)(E)(ii) of Tennessee’s December 

14, 2007, submission because the 

current Tennessee SIP does not include 

provisions to comply with the 

requirements of this sub-element. With 

the exception of sub-element 

110(a)(2)(E)(ii), EPA is proposing to 

determine that Tennessee’s 

infrastructure submission, provided to 

EPA on December 14, 2007, addressed 

all the required infrastructure elements 

for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before May 16, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– 

OAR–2011–0353, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: benjamin.lynorae@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (404) 562–9019. 

4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2011– 

0353,’’ Regulatory Development Section, 

Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. 

5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae 

Benjamin, Regulatory Development 

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, 

Pesticides and Toxics Management 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street 

SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Regional Office’s normal hours of 

operation. The Regional Office’s official 

hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal 

holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R04–OAR–2011– 

0353. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit through 

www.regulations.gov or email, 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected. The 

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA without going through 

www.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http:// 

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy at the Regulatory 

Development Section, Air Planning 

Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 

Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, 

excluding federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nacosta C. Ward, Regulatory 

Development Section, Air Planning 

Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 

Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The 

telephone number is (404) 562–9140. 

Ms. Ward can be reached via electronic 

mail at ward.nacosta@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 


emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS