alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 102

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to

guarantee the right to recite the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 26, 2002

Mr. PICKERING introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to guarantee the right to recite the Pledge of

Allegiance to the Flag.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

•HJRES 102 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE —

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The first article of amendment to the

3 Constitution of the United States shall not be construed

4 to prohibit the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance to

5 the Flag.’’.

Æ
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRESIDENT**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the amendment
      to the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q of Blackhawk Capital Group BDC, Inc. (the "Company") for
      the
      quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on the date hereof (the "Report"), Craig A. Zabala, as President of the Company,
      hereto certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
      knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  May
      8,
      2006




/s/ Craig
              A.
              ZabalaCraig A. Zabala
              President
              (Principal Executive Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Blackhawk Capital Group BDC and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




25
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 738 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States should continue 

its limited military activities within Syria and that ending such activities 

at this time would embolden ISIS, Bashar al-Assad, Iran, and Russia 

and put our Kurdish allies in great jeopardy. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 19, 2018 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. COTTON, Mrs. ERNST, Mr. 

RUBIO, Mr. KING, Mr. CORKER, and Mr. REED) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States 

should continue its limited military activities within Syria 

and that ending such activities at this time would embolden ISIS, Bashar al-Assad, Iran, and Russia and 

put our Kurdish allies in great jeopardy. 

Whereas ISIS has been dealt a serious blow in Iraq and Syria 

and is substantially damaged but not yet defeated; 

Whereas the United States has a limited military presence in 

Syria with approximately 2,000 troops who serve as an 

insurance policy against future threats; 

Whereas a precipitous withdrawal of United States Armed 

Forces from Syria will embolden radical jihadist groups 

in Syria and in the region; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 738 IS 

Whereas it is in the vital national interest of the United 

States to continue to support partners, such as the 

Kurds, in Syria and other locations in the Global War on 

Terror; 

Whereas a United States withdrawal will embolden the brutal 

dictatorship of Bashar al-Assad and bring more suffering 

to the people of Syria and the region; 

Whereas a precipitous withdrawal of United States Armed 

Forces from Syria could lead to the release of hundreds 

of foreign terrorists currently detained by the Syrian 

Democratic Forces; and 

Whereas it is in the national security interest of the United 

States to counter Iran’s and Russia’s influence in Syria 

and throughout the region: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) calls on the President to reconsider his deci3 sion to withdraw United States Armed Forces from 

4 Syria at this time; and 

5 (2) urges any future decision to withdraw 

6 United States Armed Forces from Syria to be the 

7 result of a robust interagency process and to be con8 ditions-based. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Fruit & Specialty Crops 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.

Vegetable Inspection Room 1536-S, STOP 0240

Program Division Washington, DC 20250-0240

May 28, 2013

AMENDMENT NO. 5

COMMODITY SPECIFICATION

CANNED VEGETABLES DATED FEBRUARY 2012

The purpose of this amendment is to add shipping unit weight and tolerance to Q. Tomato Paste6/10 size can or 6/10-equivalent 6/11oz pouch & 55-gallon drum, 3. Net weight, and Tomato 

Paste in Bulk for Processing, Totes/Bins, 3. Net weight.

Q. Tomato Paste- 6/10 size can or 6/10-equivalent 6/111 oz pouch 

 & 55-gallon drum:

3. Net weight - 6/10 size – The tomato paste shall occupy not less than 90 percent of the 

volume capacity of the container and the average net weight of a lot shall be not less 

than 111.0 ounces of tomato paste per can. No individual container shall weigh less 

than 109.5 ounces. 55-gallon drum – The drums shall be filled to a net weight of 

535 pounds, plus or minus 5 pounds; Maximum shipping unit (truckload) net 

weight shall equal 38,520 pounds, within a tolerance of minus 1 percent (1%). 

Tomato Paste in Bulk for Processing, Totes/Bins:

3. Net Weight – The totes/bins shall be filled to a net weight of 2,850 pounds, plus or

 minus 1%; Maximum shipping unit (truckload) net weight shall equal 39,900 

 pounds, within a tolerance of minus 1 percent (1%). 

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 22831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8997]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Public Availability of U.S. Small Business Administration FY 2010 
Service Contract Inventory

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Public Availability of FY 2011 Service Contract 
Inventories.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), the Small 
Business Administration is publishing this notice to advise the public 
of the availability of the FY 2011 Service Contract inventory. This 
inventory provides information on service, contract actions over 
$25,000 that were made in FY 2011. The information is organized by 
function to show how contracted resources are distributed throughout 
the agency. The inventory has been developed in accordance with 
guidance issued on November 5, 2010 by the Office of Management and 
Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). OFPP's guidance 
is available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/procurement/memo/service-contract-inventories-guidance-11052010.pdf. 
The Small Business Administration has posted its inventory and a 
summary of the inventory on the Small Business Administration homepage 
at the following link: http://www.sba.gov/content/service-contract-inventory.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding the service 
contract inventory should be directed to William Cody in the 
Procurement Division at (303) 844-3499 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b9eed0d5d5d0d8d497fad6ddc0f9cadbd897ded6cf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="66310f0a0a0f070b482509021f2615040748010910">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dared: March 7, 2012.
Jonathan I. Carver,
Chief Financial Officer/Associate Administrator for Performance 
Management, Office of the Chief Financial Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-8997 Filed 4-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Stafford JACKSON and Jarrell Jennings, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 75-3135.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Sept. 7, 1976.

Emmett Colvin, Dallas, Tex., for defendants-appellants.

Frank D. McCown, U. S. Atty., Ft. Worth, Tex., William F. Sanderson, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Dallas, Tex., for plaintiffappellee.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before DYER, CLARK and GEE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant complains that the court, in denying his *Brady*claim, overlooked the fact that a *Brady*request was made at the trial level. Reexamining the trial record we find that a general request for *Brady*material was made but this in no way changes the standard of materiality to be applied. The Supreme Court has recently equated a general request with no request at all:

> [W]e conclude that there is no significant difference between cases in which there has been merely a general request for exculpatory matter and cases, like the one we must now decide, in which there has been no request at all.

*United States v.*Agurs, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2392, 2399, 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976).

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby DENIED.
```

Exhibit 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report") by MDwerks Inc. (the "Registrant"), I, Howard Katz,
Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of
      Registrant.

                                                    /s/ Howard Katz
                                                    ---------------

Dated: May 15, 2006
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 493 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 493

  Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States Postal 
  Service should issue a commemorative stamp on the subject of school 
                           safety awareness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 1, 2002

   Mrs. Jones of Ohio (for herself, Mr. Owens, Mr. Lipinski, and Mr. 
    Frost) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States Postal 
  Service should issue a commemorative stamp on the subject of school 
                           safety awareness.

Whereas discipline, order, and safety have a direct link to student achievement;
Whereas a secure, positive learning environment is a critical component of a 
        high-quality education;
Whereas safe and orderly schools facilitate effective teaching and learning, 
        while violence or the threat of violence diverts attention and resources 
        from education;
Whereas students cannot learn and educators cannot teach when threatened by 
        physical violence or harassment;
Whereas safe schools require safe communities and safe families;
Whereas young people bring with them to school the problems of their homes and 
        neighborhoods;
Whereas without addressing these underlying problems, complete school safety 
        will remain elusive;
Whereas schools must work more effectively with communities and families to 
        address various forms of school violence such as gang activity, hate-
        motivated violence, sexual harassment, and drug activity; and
Whereas families and communities must acknowledge and support schools' 
        disciplinary efforts: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) the United States Postal Service should issue a 
        commemorative postage stamp on the subject of school safety 
        awareness; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
U. S. Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF COTTON

FOR RELEASE AT 12:00 P.M. CT March 24, 2020

USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of Cotton. The cotton bales were sold under 

Invitation 2020U0045 dated March 23, 2020.

Invitation 020U0045

Catalog 

Lot No. 

Catalog 

Location Purchaser Pounds Sold Bales Sold

Price Sold 

(per 

Pound)

CCC Revenue 

2020U0045 QUITMAN, GA BACO TRADING,

INC. 40,330 82 0.44 $17,745.20

40,330 $17,745.20
#### Hercules McCOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The COUNTY COURT In and For the COUNTY OF ADAMS, and the Honorable Thomas R. Ensor, one of the Judges thereof, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 80CA0226.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

Sept. 18, 1980.

Steven Katzman, Denver, for plaintiff-appellant.

No appearance for defendants-appellees.

PIERCE, Judge.

Appellant seeks reversal of a district court order denying his request for issuance of a rule to show cause and dismissing his claim for relief in the nature of a writ of prohibition filed pursuant to C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4).

As stated in *County Court v. Ruth,*194 Colo. 352, 575 P.2d 1 (1977):

> “The court of appeals’ jurisdiction on appeal is limited to issues which had been before the district court in the proper procedural posture. The procedure under Rule 106 is clear and unambiguous. In cases of this nature, ‘[u]pon the filing of the complaint the court shall direct the issuance of a citation to the inferior tribunal to show cause why the relief requested shall not be allowed.’ C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4).”

Here the district court did not issue a citation to the county court to show cause why a writ of prohibition should not issue. Trial courts have no discretion and are required to issue the order to show cause under these circumstances. Consequently, the order denying appellant’s request is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the district court with instructions to issue a citation to the county court to show cause.

COYTE and RULAND, JJ., concur.
1

**MEMORANDUM** DATE: September 18, 2012 FROM: Jeanhee Hong, Assistant Regional Counsel, EPA Region 9 TO: File / Public Docket: EPA - R09 - OAR - 2012 - 0734 RE: Phone call from Paul Cort , C ounsel for Earthjustice , re: EPA’s proposed

action on 1 - hour ozone plan for San Joaquin Valley (SJV) P. Cort : EPA’s proposed SIP call on the South Coast 1 - hour plan states that the new 1 - hour plan will be subject to CAA section 172(a)(2) deadlines (5 - 10 year language ). The way EPA got there is that those are the requirements that applied when the state developed the 1997/99 SIP . Does this rationale appl y to the SJV plan ? EPA approved the SJV 1 - hour plan in 2010. So is the belie f that the requirements will be different for SJV because of the date that the ozone plan was approved? J. Hong : the language about “requirements that applied when the state developed the 1997/99 SIP ” reflects the standard for SIP calls in CAA section 110(k)(5). O ur proposed action on the 1 - hour plan for SJV is not a propose d SIP call under CAA section 110(k)(5), so that standard does not apply . EPA is proposing to withdraw our previous approval of the SJV 1 - hour plan to set the stage for further proceedings consistent with the Ninth Circuit’s remand of our action in Sierra Club v. EPA . P. Cort : so outside of this proposal , any discussion of how we get to CAA 172(a)(2)? What requirement governs the attainment date? J. Hong : as discussed in the proposed rule , we are proposing to require that the State submit, among other plan elements, a new attainment demonstration meeting the requirements of CAA 182(c)(2)(A) and 172(a)(2). In an earlier part of the notice we identified the plan elements that we had approved in March 2010, including an attainment demonstration meeting the re quirements of CAA sections 182(c)(2)(A) and 181(a). For purposes of a new 1 - hour plan, however, we stated that the required plan elements would include an attainment demonstration meeting the requirements of CAA secti ons 182(c)(2)(A) and 172(a)(2) . P. Cort : what’s the rationale for rel yi ng on section 172(a)(2) for the attainment date? J. Hong : We did not elaborate in our proposal given the statute does not provide explicit direction in this particular context. P. Cort : We’re going to let Jared know we’ll have to advise our clients to file another deadline suit. Until the plan is withdrawn and EPA mak es a finding of failure to submit, EPA will be2

back in the same position it was in before Sierra Club brought it s original deadline suit on the 1 - hour plan

– i.e., it will have a plan in - house on which EPA action is long overdue . J. Hong : We appreciate the heads up. What if the State promptly withdraws the plan as it has indicated it would, and EPA then promptly makes a finding of failure to submit? P. Cort : Right, this i ssue may cure itself. But we will have to keep that pressure on to make sure that happens.
1

MEMORANDUM

DATE: September 18, 2012

FROM: Jeanhee Hong, Assistant Regional Counsel, EPA Region 9

TO: File / Public Docket: EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0734

RE: Phone call from Paul Cort, Counsel for Earthjustice, re: EPA’s proposed 

action on 1-hour ozone plan for San Joaquin Valley (SJV)

P. Cort: EPA’s proposed SIP call on the South Coast 1-hour plan states that the new 1-hour plan 

will be subject to CAA section 172(a)(2) deadlines (5-10 year language). The way EPA got 

there is that those are the requirements that applied when the state developed the 1997/99 SIP. 

Does this rationale apply to the SJV plan? EPA approved the SJV 1-hour plan in 2010. So is the 

belief that the requirements will be different for SJV because of the date that the ozone plan was 

approved?

J. Hong: the language about “requirements that applied when the state developed the 1997/99 

SIP” reflects the standard for SIP calls in CAA section 110(k)(5). Our proposed action on the 1-

hour plan for SJV is not a proposed SIP call under CAA section 110(k)(5), so that standard does 

not apply. EPA is proposing to withdraw our previous approval of the SJV 1-hour plan to set the 

stage for further proceedings consistent with the Ninth Circuit’s remand of our action in Sierra 

Club v. EPA.

P. Cort: so outside of this proposal, any discussion of how we get to CAA 172(a)(2)? What 

requirement governs the attainment date?

J. Hong: as discussed in the proposed rule, we are proposing to require that the State submit, 

among other plan elements, a new attainment demonstration meeting the requirements of CAA 

182(c)(2)(A) and 172(a)(2). In an earlier part of the notice we identified the plan elements that 

we had approved in March 2010, including an attainment demonstration meeting the 

requirements of CAA sections 182(c)(2)(A) and 181(a). For purposes of a new 1-hour plan, 

however, we stated that the required plan elements would include an attainment demonstration 

meeting the requirements of CAA sections 182(c)(2)(A) and 172(a)(2).

P. Cort: what’s the rationale for relying on section 172(a)(2) for the attainment date?

J. Hong: We did not elaborate in our proposal given the statute does not provide explicit 

direction in this particular context. 

P. Cort: We’re going to let Jared know we’ll have to advise our clients to file another deadline 

suit. Until the plan is withdrawn and EPA makes a finding of failure to submit, EPA will be 
2

back in the same position it was in before Sierra Club brought its original deadline suit on the 1-

hour plan – i.e., it will have a plan in-house on which EPA action is long overdue.

J. Hong: We appreciate the heads up. What if the State promptly withdraws the plan as it has 

indicated it would, and EPA then promptly makes a finding of failure to submit?

P. Cort: Right, this issue may cure itself. But we will have to keep that pressure on to make sure 

that happens.
[No. 18728-1-II.

Division Two.

June 28, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Geoffrey Randall Foutch, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 94-1-00446-5, Randolph Furman, J., entered October 6, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, J, concurred in by Seinfeld, C.J., and Morgan, J.
#### American Security Corp., Appellee, *v.*Martin et al., Appellants.

(No. 31464

Decided June 16, 1948.)

*Messrs. Parker & Fenton,*for appellee.

*Mr. D. A. Webster*and *Messrs. McGhee, Rowe <& Evans,*for appellants.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Hart,. Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.
(logo) **BERKADIA®**

 

 

 

Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Year Ended December 31, 2023 (the “ReportingPeriod”)

 

*ILPT Commercial Mortgage Trust*

*Series 2022-LPFX*

 

Pursuant to Section 13.7 ofthe Trust & Servicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction (the“Servicing Agreement”), as an authorized officer of Berkadia CommercialMortgage LLC (“Berkadia”), I hereby attest that:

 

i. A review of the activitiesand performance of Berkadia as Servicer during the Reporting Period has beenmade under my supervision.

 

ii. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, Berkadia as Servicer has fulfilled, in allmaterial respects, its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout theReporting Period and no default by the Servicer under the Servicing Agreementhas occurred and is continuing.

 

Berkadia Commercial MortgageLLC,

 

/s/ Mark E. McCool

Mark E. McCool 

President 

February 10, 2024