### 8122 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2013 / Notices

Energy LLC, Klamath Generation LLC, Klondike Wind Power LLC, Klondike Wind Power II LLC, Klondike Wind Power III LLC, Leaning Juniper Wind Power II LLC, Lempster Wind, LLC, Locust Ridge Wind Farm, LLC, Locust Ridge II, LLC, Manzana Wind LLC, MinnDakota Wind LLC, Moraine Wind LLC, Moraine Wind II LLC, Mountain View Power Partners III, LLC, New England Wind, LLC, New Harvest Wind Project LLC, Northern Iowa Windpower II LLC, Pebble Springs Wind LLC, Providence Heights Wind, LLC, Rugby Wind LLC, San Luis Solar LLC, Shiloh I Wind Project, LLC, South Chestnut LLC, Star Point Wind Project LLC, Streator-Cayuga Ridge Wind Power LLC, Trimont Wind I LLC, Twin Buttes Wind LLC.

Description: Quarterly Land Acquisition Report of Iberdrola Renewables, LLC, et al.

Filed Date: 1/29/13. Accession Number: 20130129–5089. Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/13. Docket Numbers: LA12–4–000. Applicants: Southern Company Services, Inc., Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Company, Mississippi Power Company, Southern Power Company.

Description: Quarterly Land Acquisition Report of Southern Company Services, Inc.

Filed Date: 1/29/13. Accession Number: 20130129–5090. Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/13. The filings are accessible in the Commission’s eLibrary system by clicking on the links or querying the docket number.

Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.

eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/ docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659.

Dated: January 29, 2013. Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–02496 Filed 2–4–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6717–01–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[EPA–R01–OAR–2013–0020; A–1–FRL– 9776–2]** 

**Adequacy Status of Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets for Transportation**  **Conformity Purposes; Connecticut**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice of adequacy.

**SUMMARY :**  In this notice, EPA is notifying the public that EPA has found that the 2017 and 2025 motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) in the June 22, 2012 Connecticut State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision are adequate for transportation conformity purposes. The submittal includes MOVES2010 motor vehicle emissions budgets for 2017 and 2025 for theConnecticut portion of the New YorkNorthern New Jersey-Long Island, NYNJ-CT fine particle (PM 2.5 ) nonattainment area. On March 2, 1999, the D.C. Circuit Court ruled that budgets in submitted SIPs cannot be used for conformity determinations until EPA has affirmatively found them adequate. As a result of our finding, the State of Connecticut can use the MOVES2010 motor vehicle emissions budgets from the submitted plan for future conformity determinations for the Connecticut portion of the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT PM 2.5

area.

**DATES :**  These motor vehicle emissions budgets are effective February 20, 2013.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Donald O. Cooke, Environmental Scientist, Air Quality Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, Five Post Office Square, Suite 100 (CAQ), Boston, MA 02109–3912, (617) 918– 1668, cooke.donald@epa.gov

. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Throughout this document, whenever ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean EPA.

Today’s notice is simply an announcement of a finding that we have already made. EPA New England sent a letter to Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection on January 8, 2013, stating that the 2017 and 2025 MOVES2010 motor vehicle emissions budgets in the June 22, 2012 State Implementation Plan (SIP) are adequate for transportation conformity purposes. This finding will also be announced on EPA’s conformity Web site: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/state resources/transconf/adequacy.htm

, (once there, click on ‘‘What SIP submissions has EPA already found adequate or inadequate?’’). The adequate motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) are provided in the following table:



### A DEQUATE 

### M OTOR 

### V EHICLE 

### E MISSIONS 

### B UDGETS

Direct PM 2.5 (tons per year) NO X (tons per year)

Year 2017 MVEBs for the Connecticut Portion of the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island,

NY-NJ-CT 1997 annual PM 2.5 and 2006 24-hour PM 2.5 Area ............................................................... 575 .8 12,791.8 Year 2025 MVEBs for the Connecticut Portion of the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island,

NY-NJ-CT 1997 annual PM 2.5 and 2006 24-hour PM 2.5 Area ............................................................... 516 9,728.1

Transportation conformity is required by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act. EPA’s conformity rule requires that transportation plans, programs, and projects conform to state air quality implementation plans and establishes the criteria and procedures for determining whether or not they do conform. Conformity to a SIP means that transportation activities will not produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the national ambient air quality standards.

The criteria by which we determine whether a SIP’s motor vehicle emission budgets are adequate for conformity purposes are outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). Please note that an adequacy review is separate from EPA’s completeness review, and it also should not be used to prejudge EPA’s ultimate approval of the SIP. Even if we find a budget adequate, the SIP could later be disapproved.

We have described our process for determining the adequacy of submitted


### 8123 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2013 / Notices

SIP budgets in a May 14, 1999 memorandum entitled ‘‘Conformity Guidance on Implementation of March 2, 1999 Conformity Court Decision.’’ Additional guidance on EPA’s adequacy process was published in a July 1, 2004 Federal Register final rulemaking, ‘‘Transportation Conformity Rule Amendments for the New 8-hour Ozone and PM 2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Miscellaneous Revisions for Existing Areas; Transportation Conformity Rule Amendments: Response to Court Decision and Additional Rule Changes’’ (69 FR 40004). We followed this guidance in making our adequacy determination.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q. Dated: January 25, 2013. H. Curtis Spalding, Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
[FR Doc. 2013–02492 Filed 2–4–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**  **AGENCY**

**[EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0049; FRL–9377–7]**

**Rodenticides; Notice of Intent To Cancel Registrations of, and Notice of**  **Denial of Applications for, Certain Rodenticide Bait Products** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), EPA hereby announces its intent to cancel the registration of 12 rodenticide products identified in this Notice. Pursuant to section 3(c)(6) of FIFRA, EPA hereby announces the denial of applications for registration of 2 products identified in this Notice. This Notice summarizes EPA’s basis for these actions, and explains how eligible persons may request a hearing and the consequences of requesting or failing to request such a hearing.

**DATES :**  Affected registrants must request a hearing within 30 days of receiving EPA’s Notice of Intent to Cancel, or on or before March 7, 2013, whichever occurs later. Other adversely affected parties must request a hearing on or before March 7, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  All persons who request a hearing must comply with the Agency’s Rules of Practice Governing Hearings, 40 CFR part 164. Requests for hearing must be filed with the Hearing Clerk in EPA’s Office of Administrative Law Judges (OALJ), in conformance with the requirements of 40 CFR part 164. The OALJ uses different addresses depending on the delivery method. Please see Unit VI. for specific instructions.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Neil Anderson, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number: (703) 308–8187; email address: anderson.neil@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  I. Executive Summary A. What action is the agency taking?

EPA is announcing its intent to cancel the registration of each of the pesticide products listed in Table 1:



### TABLE 

### 1—P ESTICIDE 

### P RODUCTS 

### S UBJECT TO 

### C ANCELLATION

Product EPA Reg. No. Registrant Active ingredient Deficiency

D-Con Concentrate Kills Rats & Mice 3282–3 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Warfarin ........ Consumer product in a powder form and packaged without a protective bait station. D-Con Ready Mixed Kills Rats &

Mice. 3282–4 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Warfarin ........ Consumer product in a pelleted form and packaged without a protective bait station. D-Con Mouse Prufe Kills Mice ......... 3282–9 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Warfarin ........ Consumer product in a pelleted form and pa ckaged without a protective bait station. D-Con Pellets Kills Rats & Mice ....... 3282–15 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Warfarin ........ Consumer product in a pelleted form and packaged without a protective bait station. D-Con Mouse Prufe II ....................... 3282–65 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Brodifacoum .. Consumer product: (1) In a pelleted form and packaged without a protective bait station,and (2) contains a second generation anticoagulant rodenticide (SGAR). D-Con Pellets Generation II .............. 3282–66 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Brodifacoum .. Consumer product: (1) In a pelleted form and packaged without a protective bait station, and (2) containing a SGAR. D-Con Bait Pellets II ......................... 3282–74 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Brodifacoum .. Consumer product: (1) In a pelletedform and packaged without a protective bait station, and (2) containing a SGAR. D-Con Ready Mixed Generation II ... 3282–81 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Brodifacoum .. Consumer product: (1) In a pelleted form and packaged without a protective bait station, and (2) containing a SGAR. D-Con Mouse-Prufe III ...................... 3282–85 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Difethialone ... Consumer product: (1) In a pelleted form and packaged without a protective bait station, and (2) containing a SGAR. D-Con Bait Pellets III ........................ 3282–86 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Difethialone ... Consumer product: (1) In a pellet ed form and packaged without a protective bait station, and (2) containing a SGAR. D-Con II Ready Mix Baitbits III ......... 3282–87 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Difethialone ... Consumer product: (1) In a pelleted for m and packaged without a protective bait station, and (2) containing a SGAR. D-Con Bait Packs III ......................... 3282–88 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Difethialone ... Consumer product: (1) In a pellete d form and packaged without a protective bait station, and (2) containing a SGAR.