alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1  Certifications  I, Mike McKeever, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-P2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d- 18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following  unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Computershare Trust Company, National  Association.  Date: March 26, 2024  Mike McKeever President  Carvana Receivables Depositor LLC  (senior officer in charge of securitization)  /s/ Mike McKeever
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8688]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER12-1435-000]


ReEnergy Stratton LLC; Supplemental Notice That Revised Market-
Based Rate Tariff Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
ReEnergy Stratton LLC's tariff revision filing, noting that such filing 
includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is April 25, 2012.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#60262532232f0e0c090e05331510100f121420060512034e070f16"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b0f6f5e2f3ffdedcd9ded5e3c5c0c0dfc2c4f0d6d5c2d39ed7dfc6">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: April 5, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8688 Filed 4-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document

Exhibit 10.1

THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE
PROTHENA CORPORATION PLC
2018 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN


This Third Amendment (this “Third Amendment”) to the Prothena Corporation plc 2018 Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended (“2018 LTIP”), was made and adopted by the Board of Directors (“Board”) of Prothena Corporation plc, a public limited company organized under the laws of Ireland (the “Company”), on February 23, 2022, effective as of May 17, 2022, the date approved by the Company’s shareholders (the “Amendment Date”).


RECITALS


WHEREAS, the Company maintains the 2018 LTIP; and


WHEREAS, the Board believes it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to amend the 2018 LTIP to increase the number of ordinary shares authorized for issuance under the 2018 LTIP.


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the 2018 LTIP is hereby amended as follows, effective as of the Amendment Date:


AMENDMENT


1.Section 2.28 of the 2018 LTIP is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


“2.28 “Overall Share Limit” means the sum of (i) 7,100,000 Shares; (ii) the aggregate number of Shares that remain available for future awards under the Prior Plan as of immediately prior to the Effective Date; and (iii) any Shares that are subject to Prior Plan Awards that become available for issuance under the Plan pursuant to Article V.”


2.This Third Amendment shall be and hereby is incorporated into and forms a part of the 2018 LTIP, and except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions of the 2018 LTIP shall remain in full force and effect.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7047
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALVIN BASS, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at A lexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-90-352-A, CA-97-754-AM) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 30, 1997 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Alvin Bass, Appellant Pro Se. Cathleen Ann Tutty, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Bass , No. CR-90-352-A; CA-97-754-AM (E.D. Va. May 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) Monthly Inventory Report 

As of March 28, 2022 

(Million Units Except as Noted) 

CCC Commodity 

Unit of 

Measure 

Outstanding

Under Loan 

CY 2020 

Outstanding

Under Loan 

CY 2021 

CCC-Owned 

Inventory

(Actual Units) 

Butter Pounds - - -

Cheese Pounds - - -

Nonfat Dry Milk Pounds - - -

Barley Bushels 0.2 1.0 0.0 

Corn Bushels 1.4 310.5 0.0 

Oats Bushels 0.0 0.1 0.0 

Sorghum Cwt. 0.0 0.2 0.0 

Soybeans Bushels 0.2 44.7 0.0 

Wheat Bushels 0.3 4.1 0.0 

Rice Cwt. 0.1 23.1 0.0 

Refined Sugar Pounds 55.0 839.6 0.0 

 In-process Beet Pounds 0.0 1,078.0 0.0 

Raw Cane Sugar Pounds 0.0 1,367.9 0.0 

 In-process Cane Pounds - - -

Honey Pounds 0.0 2.7 0.0 

Peanuts 

Tons (not 

millions) 50.0 1,685,550.0 0.0 

Canola Seed* Cwt. 0.0 40.0 0.0 

Crambe* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Flaxseed* Cwt. 0.0 2.0 0.0 

Mustard Seed* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Rapeseed* Cwt. - - -

Safflower Seed* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Sesame Seed* Cwt. - - -

Sunflower Seed (Oil)* Cwt. 20.0 123.0 0.0 

Sunflower Seed (Other)* Cwt. 0.0 6.0 0.0 

Dry Peas* Cwt. 58.0 66.0 0.0 

Lentils* Cwt. 7.0 11.0 0.0 

Chickpeas* Cwt. 17.0 21.0 0.0 

Upland Cotton 

1,000 

Running 

Bales 0.0 2,648.7 0.0 

ELS Cotton 

1,000 

Running 

Bales 0.0 78.7 0 
Notes: 

 *Minor Oilseeds & Pulses are in thousand units. 

 CCC acquired 2020 Crop Year Upland (if not specified) and ELS cotton because of the following 

months' forfeited Marketing Assistance Loans: 

o 22 bales from November 2021, 85 bales from December 2021, 87 bales from January and 

20 bales from February 2022. 

o Invitations sold all 22 bales in November, 85 bales in December, 87 bales in January and 

20 bales in February 2022. 

o In total, there were 0 bales of cotton in inventory as of March 28, 2022. 

Report Completed: April 29, 2022.
Webinar Attendees: Negotiated Rulemaking for Distribution Transformers Low-Voltage Working Group Meeting Meeting Date: Thursday, October 13, 2011 Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax Email Cohen, Daniel Assistant General Counsel for Legislation and Regulatory Law US Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence AvenueWashingtonDC20585 202-586-9523 202-586-5870 Daniel.Cohen@hq.doe.gov Corel, Dale Sr. Design Engineer NEMA 9377 W. Higgins Rd. Rosemont IL 60018 N/A N/A dale.corel@emerson.com Freeman, Jeremiah Energy Analyst New West Technologies, LLC 1000 Independence Ave, SW WashingtonDC20585 N/A N/A jeremiah.freeman@ee.doe.gov Greeson, Robert S. Sr. Electrical Design Engineer P.E. Federal Pacific P.O. Box 8200 Bristol VA24203-8200 276-669-4084 276-645-8210 276-669-1869 rgreeson@electro-mechanical.com rgreeson@federalpacific.com Harden, Kenneth Sr Electrical Engineer Schneider Electric 6 Commercial Rd Huntington IN 46750 N/A N/A kenneth.harden@schneider-electric.com Kennedy, Chad Industry Standards Manager Schneider Electric 8821 Garners Ferry Road Hopkins SC29061 N/A N/A chad.kennedy@schneider-electric.com Ling, Philip VP Technology Powersmiths International Corp 10 Devon Road Brampton ONL6T5B5 N/A N/A pling@powersmiths.com Lyke, Richard F. Principal Engineer, Product Development & Applications Engineering AK Steel Corporation 705 Curtis Street Middletown OH45043-0001 513-425-5709 513-425-5866 richard.lyke@aksteel.com Patzner, Thomas Marketing Specialist Square D / Schneider Electric 1010 Airpark Center Drive Nashville TN 37217 615-844-8536 N/A thomas.patzner@us.schneider-electric.com
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 101 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 101

Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained in section 
        402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to Vietnam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2002

 Mr. Rohrabacher introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained in section 
        402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to Vietnam.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress does not 
approve the extension of the authority contained in section 402(c) of 
the Trade Act of 1974 recommended by the President to the Congress on 
June 3, 2002, with respect to Vietnam.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ALBERT SILVA HERNANDEZ, Jr.,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-10428

D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00254-JCMPAL-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 10, 2014

San Francisco, California

Before: KOZINSKI, RAWLINSON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Albert Silva Hernandez, Jr. (Hernandez) appeals his jury conviction and

sentence for eight counts of sexually exploiting a child, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §

2251(a).

1. Hernandez contends that the government impermissibly changed its

FILED

MAY 26 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
theory of prosecution during rebuttal argument by deviating from the jury

instruction that focused on the word “persuaded.” However, the indictment and the

evidence presented at trial provided Hernandez adequate notice of the charges

against him. See Morrison v. Estelle, 981 F.2d 425, 428-29 (9th Cir. 1992). 

Therefore, we reject Hernandez’s Sixth Amendment argument. 

2. Under plain error review, there was no double counting. See United

States v. Bonilla-Guizar, 729 F.3d 1179, 1187 (9th Cir. 2013). Hernandez was

charged and convicted under a federal statute, not the state companion statute. 

Because the federal statute does not contain the abuse of trust and sexual contact

enhancements as elements, there was no double counting. See United States v.

Kiefer, 760 F.3d 926, 931-32 (9th Cir. 2014).

3. Hernandez contends that the district court erred in applying the

distribution enhancement set forth in U.S.S.G. § 2G2.1(b)(3) because he “did not

share or attempt to share the images of [the victim] with anyone other than her. . .

.” When the district court applied the distribution enhancement, it did not have the

benefit of our decision in United States v. Roybal, 737 F.3d 621 (9th Cir. 2013). 

We express no view on the application of Roybal to this case, but remand the

2
matter for the district court to consider in the first instance whether the distribution

enhancement may be applied when the defendant does not distribute the image to a

third party. We defer any determination on the reasonableness of the sentence

imposed pending the district court’s consideration of the remanded issue. The

panel retains jurisdiction over this appeal. 

Distribution enhancement REMANDED; AFFIRMED on all other

grounds. 

3
AMS Frozen Pasteurized Whole Eggs Microbial Performance - Fiscal Year: 20181/,2/

Standard Plate Count3/ Total Coliforms4/ 

Contractor

# Lots Produced 

(% of Total)

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit # Po

C2 105 (42.0) 00 0 0 

C3 7 (2.8) 00 0 0 C4 122 (48.8) 00 0 0 C5 4 (1.6) 00 0 0 C6 12 (4.8) 0 0 18.33

Total 250 (100.0) 0 0 10.40

1/A full description of the frozen pasteurized whole eggs purchase program specification is available at https://www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food/product-specs#2/Production Dates: October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018.3/Standard Plate Count Critical Limit: 1,000 CFU/g.4/Total Coliforms Critical Limit: 10 CFU/g.5/Salmonella Critical Limit: Positive (+) Result / 25g.
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-4817 Directorate Identifier: 2014-NM-115-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 6 $ 510.00 $0 $ 510.00 124 $63,240.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $63,240

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

Repair 15.0 $1,275.00 10,000 $11,275.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
A-A-20102B

September 12, 2016

COMMERCIAL ITEM DESCRIPTION 

JUICE, LEMON, CONCENTRATED, FROZEN

This cancellation was approved by 

the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Commercial Item Description A-A-20102B, Juice, Lemon, Concentrated, Frozen dated May 1, 

1998, is hereby canceled due to the contents being incorporated into Commercial Item 

Description A-A-20144C, Juice, Lemon and Juice, Lime dated August 15, 2016.

Preparing Activity: 

USDA - SCP 

FSC 8915

INCH-POUND NOTICE OF 

CANCELLATION
APPENDIX 9E 2008 INPUT LEV2CERT.D

T2 CERT

 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 

 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 

 0.051 0.051 0.051 0.051 0.051 

 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 

 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.075 

 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.125 0.125 

 0.075 0.075 0.100 0.140 0.140 

 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.160 0.195 

 0.040 0.040 0.050 0.100 0.117 

 0.075 0.075 0.100 0.160 0.195 

 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

 1.700 1.700 1.700 1.700 1.700 

 1.700 1.700 1.700 1.700 1.700 

 1.700 1.700 1.700 1.700 1.700 

 1.700 1.700 1.700 1.700 1.700 

 3.400 3.400 3.400 3.400 3.400 

 3.400 3.400 3.400 3.400 3.400 

 3.400 3.400 3.400 3.400 3.400 

 3.400 3.400 3.400 3.400 3.400 

 1.700 1.700 2.200 4.400 5.000 

 3.400 3.400 4.400 4.400 5.000 

 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.014 

 0.021 0.021 0.021 0.021 0.021 

 0.029 0.029 0.029 0.029 0.029 

 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 

 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 

 0.140 0.140 0.140 0.140 0.140 

 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 

 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 

 0.200 0.200 0.400 0.400 0.600 

 0.200 0.200 0.400 0.400 0.600 

 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lincoln Park Bancorp (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald S. Hom,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with this quarterly report on Form
10-QSB, that I have reviewed the Form 10-QSB and that to the best of my
knowledge:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of
                operations of the Company.


                           /s/ Donald S. Hom
                           -----------------
                           Donald S. Hom
                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                           (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)


May 12, 2005
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Next Bridge Hydrocarbons,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2022 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Clifton DuBose, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Clifton DuBose, Jr.