alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 603 

Designating September 2018 as ‘‘School Bus Safety Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2018 

Mrs. FISCHER (for herself and Mr. PETERS) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2018 as ‘‘School Bus Safety Month’’. 

Whereas, every school day in the United States, approximately 500,000 public and private school buses carry 

more than 26,000,000 children to and from school; 

Whereas school buses comprise the largest mass transportation fleet in the United States; 

Whereas 55 percent of all K–12 students ride a school bus, 

totaling 260,000,000 miles for each of the 180 school 

days in a year, or 46,800,000,000 miles driven annually; 

Whereas the Child Safety Network, celebrating 29 years of 

national public service, supports the CSN Safe Bus campaign, which is designed to provide the latest technology 

and free safety and security resources to the school bus 

industry; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 603 IS 

Whereas the designation of School Bus Safety Month will 

allow broadcast and digital media and social networking 

industries to make commitments to disseminate public 

service announcements that are produced in order— 

(1) to provide resources designed to safeguard children; and 

(2) to recognize school bus drivers and professionals; 

Whereas key leaders who are deserving of recognition during 

School Bus Safety Month and beyond have provided security awareness training materials to more than 14,000 

public and private school districts, trained more than 

100,000 school bus operators, and provided more than 

110,000 counterterrorism guides to individuals who are 

key to providing both safety and security for children in 

the United States; and 

Whereas School Bus Safety Month offers the Senate and the 

people of the United States an opportunity to recognize 

and thank all of the school bus drivers in the United 

States and the professionals who are focused on school 

bus safety and security: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates September 

2 2018 as ‘‘School Bus Safety Month’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
p130203.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0203 Focus Ready Draft 1/31/2013

ENGINEER: Choudhary \ EV PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

Page 1p130203.eng

SAT (concerns) (01/18/2013): Migration to groundwater: Slow PBT rating: P2B1T1

Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 12 ppb), XB Testing (No Testing desired)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

Page 2p130203.eng

Page 3p130203.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0203

Page 4p130203.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0203

Page 5p130203.eng

Page 6
Second, even if the court were to enter a written order, this 

court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is 

authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 

100 Nev. 207, 209, 678 P.2d 1152, 1153 (1984). No statute or court rule 

authorizes an appeal from an order denying leave to amend a complaint; 

thus, the challenged order is not substantively appealable on this basis. 

See NRAP 3A(b) (listing orders and judgments from which an appeal may 

be taken). Accordingly, we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.' 

tAa,gia.42\ , C.J. 

Hardesty 

cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge 

Felton L. Matthews, Jr. 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

'We deny as moot appellant's "Emergency Letter in Lieu of NRAP 65 

'Permission to file Motion for Summary Judgment in Support of 

Substantive Relief and Motion for Summary Judgment in Support of 

Substantive Relief." 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1907A
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Appellate District State of Texas MIKEL EUGENE HALL, JR.,

Appellant

v. NO. 06-15-00053-CR Trial Court #2013-F-00107 STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
COMES NOW Mikel Eugene Hall, Jr., Appellant, by and through his below named Attorney and pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, hereby requests an extension of the time period for the filing of the Appellant’s Brief and in support of same would show the Court as follows:
I. A. This case is pending from the 5th Judicial District Court of Cass County, Texas. The date of the Judgment is March 11, 2015, with sentence being imposed by the trial court on March 11, 2015. B. The case was styled, “State of Texas v. Mikel Eugene Hall, Jr., Cause No. 2013F00107, Count I and Count II.

1 ACCEPTED 06-15-00053-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 9/15/2015 10:24:39 AM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERKC. Ap p e llant was convicte d of the offe ns e of I nde ce ncy wi th C h i l d and

S exual As s ault of child.
D

. Punis hme nt was as s e s s e d b y the trial court at 15 ye ars in the
I ns titutional D ivis ion of the Te xas D e p artme nt of Criminal J us tice

. E. The Ap p e llant’ s Brie f is due to b e file d S e p te mb e r 10 , 20 15
. F. Ap p e llant re que s ts an e xte ns ion of t he filing of Ap p e llant’ s Brie f of five day s, mak ing the Ap p e llant’ s Brie f due on S e p te mb e r 15 , 20 15
. G

. Ap p e llant’ s attorne y has b e e n dilig e nt in re s e arching and p re paring the Ap p e llant’ s b r i e f for the Court howe ve r, due to couns el contracting a

s tomach virus , Ap p ellant’ s couns e l has had i n su f f i c i ent time to comp le te Ap p e llant’ s b rie f.
H. The re has b e en one p re vious re que s ts for e xte ns i ons in this caus e . I I

. Ap p e llant’ s attorne y has b ee n dilig e nt in purs uing this ap p e al and is not

s e e k ing this e xte ns ion for the p u rp os e of de l ay . PRAYER WHEREFORE, on the b as is of the Te xas Rule s of Ap p e l late Proce dure , Ap p e llant’ s attorne y re s p e ctfully re que s ts this Court t o g rant the Motion for
Exte ns ion of Time for the filing of Ap p e llant’ s Brie f.

2Re s p e ctfully s ub mitte d,
/s/ Alwin A. S m it h Alwin A. Smith TBN : 18 5 3 220 0 al@ alwins mith. com 60 2 P i ne S tre e t Te xark ana, Te xas 75 50 1 90 3/792- 160 8 90 3/792- 0 899 Fax
CERTIF IC

A TE O F SERVIC E This is to ce rtify that a true and corre ct cop y of the ab ove and fore g oing Motion for Exte ns ion of Time to File Ap p e llant’ s Brie f has b e e n forwarde d to Ms

. Courtne y S he lton, 60 4 N orth Hig hway 8 , L inde n, Te xas 75 5 63 , on this the 15 th day of S e p te mb e r 20 1 5 b y

U. S . Mail.
/s/ Alwin A. S m it h Alwin A. Smith

3
28 June 2013

Richard Payton

8P-AR

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII

1595 Wynkoop Street

Denver, CO 80202-1129

Dear Richard:

Enclosed is the Exceptional Event report for the high wind/blowing dust episode that occurred on May 22 to

May 23, 2010 in Alamosa, Pagosa Springs and Grand Junction, Colorado. Data for this event are flagged on 

AQS, as required. This report, and the analysis and data contained within it, clearly shows that this exceptional 

event passed the four required tests under 40 CFR 50.14 (3)(iv).

This report was made available for public comment on our website from May 28 through June 27, 2013, and 

was also distributed to potentially interested parties. Some minor non-substantiative external comments were 

received and corrections have been made to the report. Some non-substantiative and formatting changes were 

also made to the report by the Air Pollution Control Division. The Division commits to submitting an 

Addendum further detailing Local Particulate Matter Dust Control Measures: Windblown Dust from Disturbed 

Soils for potential areas surrounding the Alamosa Municipal Building PM10 monitor.

We respectfully request a review of this exceptional event report and concurrence by EPA on this natural high 

wind/blowing dust event.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Gordon E. Pierce

Program Manager

Technical Services Program

Air Pollution Control Division

cc. Deirdre Rothery, EPA

Lisa Clarke, APCD

Kaitlin Stabrava, APCD

Pat McGraw, APCD

Pat Reddy, APCD

Terry Furuli, APCD
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-4031

___________

Mary L. Sanderson, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Southern

v. * District of Iowa.

*

Iowa Commission of Veterans Affairs, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: July 31, 2000

Filed: August 3, 2000 

___________

Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Mary L. Sanderson appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary

judgment based on Eleventh Amendment immunity in Sanderson's employment-based

action for claimed violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Having

considered the record and the parties' briefs, we are satisfied the district court properly

relied on our decisions in Alsbrook v. City of Maumelle, 184 F.3d 999, 1002, 1010 (8th

Cir. 1999) (en banc) (in applying Title II of ADA to States, Congress exceeded its

authority under § 5 of Fourteenth Amendment), cert. granted, 120 S. Ct. 1003, and

dismissed, 120 S. Ct. 1265 (2000), and DeBose v. Nebraska, 207 F.3d 1020, 1021 (8th
-2-

Cir. 1999) (extending Alsbrook to Title I of ADA), petition for cert. filed, 68 U.S.L.W.

3391 (U.S. Dec. 1, 1999) (No. 99-940). Additionally, the Supreme Court recently held

that Congress exceeded its enforcement authority under Section 5 of the Fourteenth

Amendment by purporting to abrogate the States' Eleventh Amendment immunity in

lawsuits brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. See Kimel v.

Florida Bd. of Regents, 120 S. Ct. 631, 651 (2000). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th

Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**Exhibit
      32**








CERTIFICATION
      OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF MISCOR GROUP, LTD.


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      on Form 10-Q of MISCOR Group, Ltd. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period
      ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on
      the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company,
      hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
      knowledge:





(1)         The
      Report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)         The
      information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                November 8,
                2007/s/
                John A.
                MartellName:
                John A.
                MartellTitle:
                President & Chief
                Executive Officer/s/
                Richard J.
                MullinName:
                Richard J.
                MullinTitle:
                Chief Financial
                Officer
# Company sanitized

Does not contain Confidential Business

Information (CBI)

Appendix D



# Draft Facility Report on Product Content

## 2010/15 PFOA Stewardship Program



# Draft Facility Report on Product Content

I. CHEMICAL IDENTIFICATION

Identify the product (e.g fluoropolymer dispersion) for which you are submitting information:

Product name:___Fluorinated Surfactant(monomeric)_______

Product description (including concentrations of perfluoroalkyl chemicals

identified in Section IV below and year of production):

All products under the name of “Fluorinated Surfactant (monomeric)” are

considered to be precursors to PFOA and higher homologues.

II. COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

Identify the company and location of the facility submitting information:

Company name:_AGC SEIMI CHEMICAL CO.,LTD

Site location:3-2-10,Chigasaki,Ch igasaki City,Kanagawa,253-8585 Japan

:2276-2,Nada,Hirai,Kashima City,Ibaraki,314-0012 Japan

Identify a company technical contact who can respond to inquiries about the information

submitted:

Technical contact:_Shunji Odaka

Phone: _+81-467-82-4398____

Address: 3-2-10,Chigasaki,Chigasaki City,Kanagawa,253-8585 Japan

III. PRODUCTION

Calendar year for which you are reporting: Jan 1, 2013 to Dec 31, 2013

(Data reported in the report are equal to data based on year end run rate.)

Provide the amount of the product for the reporting year at each specific site:

Imported ___0 ____kgs/yr

Manufactured _0__ kgs/yrIV. PRODUCT CONTENT

A. CONCENTRATIONS OF RELEVANT PERFLUOROALKYL CHEMICALS

Please provide the concentrations (ppb) of various perfluoroalkyl chemicals in your product. For

chemicals for which you do not have actual data, please provide range estimates.

No manufacturing activity.

B. ANALYTICAL METHODS

Analyses should be conducted using the most accurate instrumentation and procedures available

as of the time of testing. Please provide detailed information on the methods used (including

analytical standards used, sampling, sample treatment, analysis), assumptions made, uncertainties

and detection limits (LOD, LOQ) for the data provided.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8516]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Special Medical Advisory Group; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Special Medical 
Advisory Group will meet on April 19, 2012, in Room 830 at VA Central 
Office, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC, from 8:30 a.m. to 3 
p.m. The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Group is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs and the Under Secretary for Health on the care and treatment of 
disabled Veterans, and other matters pertinent to the Department's 
Veterans Health Administration (VHA).
    The agenda for the meeting will include discussions on the Academic 
Affiliations Council, ethics, an update on social services, and the 
White House initiative, ``Joining Forces.''
    No time will be allocated for receiving oral presentations from the 
public. However, members of the public may submit written statements 
for review by the Committee to Ms. Juanita Leslie, VA Office of 
Administrative Operations (10B), VHA, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20420, or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0862267c26646d7b64616d487e69266f677e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="83e9adf7adefe6f0efeae6c3f5e2ade4ecf5">[email protected]</span></a>. Any member of 
the public wishing to attend the meeting or seeking additional 
information should contact Ms. Leslie at (202) 461-7019.

    By Direction of the Secretary.

    Dated: April 4, 2012.
Vivian Drake,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-8516 Filed 4-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Ultra

- Clean, Efficient, Reliable Power **Technology Briefing March 2015** 

# Expanding **Market Opportunities**

Stationary Industrial

Transportation

Compression Natural Gas Combined cycle plant

Coal

- fired Distributed Generation & Storage Distributed

Hydrogen Carbon Capture

Electrolysis & Storage Distributed Generation

On

- site CHP

Multi

- MW grid support DFC® carbonate fuel cells Solid Oxide fuel cells

On

- site CHP

Power & Energy Storage Supply, Recovery & Compression Emission reduction / Power & CO 2 Supply and emissions reduction

2 

### Technology Platform Support Low Carbon Goals SOFC electrolysis and reversible SOFC with hydrogen storage

# Carbon Capture

3 

### • **Added Feature from Core DFC Technology** 

• Carbonate process transfers CO 2 

### from Cathode to Anode

• This aspect can be exploited for CO 2 

### separation in anode, allowing for easy capture

• Capture feature supported by DOE Fossil R&D and Industrial validation



### • **Attractive Market Solution**

• Affordable compliance mechanism

• Scalable / Rapid installation

• Multiple Applications

# Carbon Capture Applications

• **Large**
**- scale carbon capture from coal** 
**** **fired plants**

– Ultimate objective of DOE

- supported development



### • **Scalable carbon capture from natural gas plants** 

– Carbon reduction on baseload or peaking systems from DG thru Utility GTCC



### • **Carbon capture for industry**

– Reduced carbon footprint from energy intense processes (i.e. petrochemicial or cement production)

–


### • **Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR)**

– On

- site generation from associated gas with CO 2 

### capture for EOR

4

## Distributed Hydrogen

5 

### • $1/gal=$2/kg, per fuel used per mile

• 0.7 kg/d per car; 5

– 10 kg/d per bus

• Regional strategy: LA 70MW biogas at MW sites, enough for 40K cars

• Secure Biogas supply ,H2 contract • Industrial users pay $5 to $20/kg depending on volume consumed

• On site tri

- generation provides H2 for $2 to $7/kg depending on cost of power an value of heat

# SOFC Storage

• **SOFC Stacks run very efficiently in fuel cell and electrolysis mode** 

• **Hydrogen produced during electrolysis stored, used in fuel cell mode** 

• **Hydrogen storage expanded without increasing system cost** 

6 Large market potential SOFC/ SOEC PEM elect
rolysis/

Fuel Cell Li Battery Pb Acid Battery Flow Battery Comp
ressed

Air

Efficiency > 65%

Cost

– <2 hr duration

Cost

– > 2 hr duration

Scalability
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rand Logistics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2008 (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: February 14, 2008


                               /s/ Laurence S. Levy
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Laurence S. Levy
                               Chairman of the Board and
                               Chief Executive Officer
[No. 34091-3-I.

Division One.

July 29, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Benson Carver Jones, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 93-1-02686-9, Ricardo S. Martinez, J., entered February 7, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Coleman, J., concurred in by Kennedy, A.C.J., and Cox, J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Bankruptcy Compliance Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, May 8, 2012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Timothy Shepard at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6095.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Bankruptcy Compliance Project Committee will be held Tuesday, May 08, 2012, at 9 a.m. Pacific Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Timothy Shepard. For more information please contact Mr. Shepard at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6095, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS Issues.

Dated: March 28, 2012.

Louis Morizio,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2012-8411 Filed 4-6-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  By:/s/ John EmeryJohn EmeryChief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
* Of the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION - NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] 

# United States Court of Appeals

**For the First Circuit** No. 01-1056 IN RE DEBORAH MILLS AND PETER MILLS, Debtors, DEBORAH MILLS, PETER MILLS,

Appellants,
v. J. SCHWARTZ MOTOR; Consolidated Defendant-Appellee, HARMON LAW OFFICE; FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP.;

SALEM FIVE CENTS SAVINGS BANK,

Appellees, TIMOTHY P. SMITH, Trustee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr., U.S. District Judge ]
Before Torruella, Circuit Judge , Gibson, * Senior Circuit Judge , and Lipez, Circuit Judge . Daniel A. Laufer , on brief for appellants. David M. Rosen , with whom HarmonLaw Offices, P.C. were on brief for appellees.-2- August 9, 2001-3- Per Curiam . The panel affirms the decision of the district court based on the reasoning therein. Millsv. Harmon Law Offices, et al. , Civ. No. 00-109-JD, Op. No. 2000 DNH 227 (D.N.H. Oct. 23, 2000) (order). All motions currently pending regarding appellants' reply brief are denied as moot.
# Figure 4 MT data and chart 

# Figure 4 MT data and chart 

# Sheet1

# Sheet1