alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM LEE BELL, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

COUNTY OF MARICOPA; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-16600 

D.C. No. 2:19-cv-04809-MTL-JFM 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner William Lee Bell appeals pro se from the district 

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging an access-tocourts claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a 

dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-16600 

2000). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Bell’s action because Bell failed to 

allege facts sufficient to demonstrate that he suffered an actual injury. See Lewis v. 

Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 349-53 (1996) (elements of an access-to-courts claim and 

actual injury requirement); see also Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341-42 (9th Cir. 

2010) (although pro se pleadings are construed liberally, a plaintiff must present 

factual allegations sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 35.1





Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.








This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 16, 2022 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-1 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.  I further certify as follows:





1. I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023, and its performance under the Agreement.





2. To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.








AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.





By:/s/ Connie CoffeyDated:March 4, 2024Connie CoffeyExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-4754

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHARLES C. PAYNE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge; Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CR-90-280)

Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 25, 1997

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hunt L. Charach, Federal Public Defender, Brian J. Kornbrath,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellant. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Ray M.

Shepard, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles C. Payne appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to continue his hearing for revocation of supervised

release. We affirm.

We review a district court's denial of a motion for continuance for an abuse of discretion. To warrant reversal of such a

denial, an appellant must establish both that the district court

abused its discretion and that he or she was prejudiced thereby.

United States v. Bakker, 925 F.2d 728, 735 (4th Cir. 1991). Payne

has established neither and accordingly we affirm the district

court's denial of his motion for continuance. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) Monthly Inventory Report 

As of May 31, 2022 

(Million Units Except as Noted) 

CCC Commodity 

Unit of 

Measure 

Outstanding

Under Loan 

CY 2020 

Outstanding

Under Loan 

CY 2021 

CCC-Owned 

Inventory

(Actual Units) 

Butter Pounds - - -

Cheese Pounds - - -

Nonfat Dry Milk Pounds - - -

Barley Bushels 0.2 0.6 0.0 

Corn Bushels 0.3 204.4 0.0 

Oats Bushels 0.0 0.2 0.0 

Sorghum Cwt. 0.0 0.2 0.0 

Soybeans Bushels 0.0 29.6 0.0 

Wheat Bushels 0.1 1.9 0.0 

Rice Cwt. 0.1 14.8 0.0 

Refined Sugar Pounds 0.0 760.6 0.0 

 In-process Beet Pounds 0.0 856.5 0.0 

Raw Cane Sugar Pounds 0.0 1,057.8 0.0 

 In-process Cane Pounds - - -

Honey Pounds 0.0 2.6 0.0 

Peanuts 

Tons (not 

millions) 50.0 1,125,000 0.0 

Canola Seed* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Crambe* Cwt. - - -

Flaxseed* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Mustard Seed* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Rapeseed* Cwt. - - -

Safflower Seed* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Sesame Seed* Cwt. - - -

Sunflower Seed (Oil)* Cwt. 0.0 81.0 0.0 

Sunflower Seed (Other)* Cwt. 0.0 6.0 0.0 

Dry Peas* Cwt. 4.0 56.0 0.0 

Lentils* Cwt. 0.0 3.0 0.0 

Chickpeas* Cwt. 17.0 19.0 0.0 

Upland Cotton 

1,000 

Running 

Bales 0.0 1,169.3 0.0 

ELS Cotton 

1,000 

Running 

Bales 0.0 41.5 0 
Notes: 

 *Minor Oilseeds & Pulses are in thousand units. 

 CCC acquired 2020 Crop Year Upland (if not specified) and ELS cotton because of the following 

months' forfeited Marketing Assistance Loans: 

o 22 bales from November 2021, 85 bales from December 2021, 87 bales from January and 

20 bales from February 2022. 

o Invitations sold all 22 bales in November, 85 bales in December, 87 bales in January and 

20 bales in February 2022. 

o In total, there were 0 bales of cotton in inventory as of June 22, 2022. 

Report Completed: June 22, 2022.
Impurity and CAS Registry Number (a) Maximum percent

(b)Confidential CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI CBI TS-H201PP 

### Attachment 4 Page 1/1
391 A.2d 707

#### Commonwealth ex rel. Roney, Appellant, v. Norris.

Submitted March 30, 1977.

Joseph W. Mullin, Public Defender, for appellant; No appearance entered nor brief submitted for appellee.

Order affirmed.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
prkr_ex104.htm

EXHIBIT 10.4
  
 List of Holders
  
 	 Purchaser
	  
	 Subscription Amount
	  

	 Thomas Staz Revocable Trust
	  
	$	65,000	  

	 Harold Wrobel
	  
	$	130,000	  

	 Ronald T. Bevans, Jr.
	  
	$	65,000	  

	 Alpine Partners (BVI) LP
	  
	$	500,000	  


  
 	 
	 1
United States
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-Q/A
 (Amendment No. 1)
 (Mark One)
 þ
    
    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from  to
 Commission file number  333-116595
 LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P.
  Delaware
    
    20-1056194(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
 
 þ o
  Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company þ o þ




---



##### 



LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P.
Quarterly Report on 10-Q/A
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
Explanatory Note




---



##### 



ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES




---



##### 



PART II  OTHER INFORMATION
 ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description3.1
    
    
    Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (1)3.2
    
    
    Certificate of Limited Partnership (2)4.1
    
    
    Forms of letters sent to limited partners confirming their investment (2)10.1
    
    
    Fifth Amendment to Secured Loan Agreement with WestLB AG, New York Branch, dated
June 1, 2008 (3)31.1
    
    
    Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.31.2
    
    
    Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.32.1
    
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code.32.2
    
    
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code.
 
 (1)
    
    Filed previously as Appendix A to our Post-Effective Amendment
No. 3 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed on January 24, 2004.(2)
    
    Filed previously as an Exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to our
Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on June 7, 2002.(3)
    
    Filed previously on August 14, 2008 as an exhibit to our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and by this
reference incorporated herein.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P.
A Delaware Limited PartnershipBy:
    LEAF Financial Corporation, its General PartnerOctober 14, 2008
    /s/ Crit DeMentCRIT DEMENTChairman and Chief Executive OfficerOctober 14, 2008
    /s/ Robert K. MoskovitzROBERT K. MOSKOVITZChief Financial OfficerOctober 14, 2008
    /s/ Tonya L. ZweierTONYA L. ZWEIERChief Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly Report of West Coast Car Company
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert Worthington, Chief Executive Officer of the small business issuer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the small
business issuer.



/s/ Robert Worthington
-----------------------
Robert Worthington
Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2006
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

June 7, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 06-16212

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-00456-CR-T-17-MAP

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

ORLANDO VENECILLA SALAS, 

a.k.a. Salas Orlando, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(June 7, 2007)

Before BIRCH, BARKETT and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

John Kingston, appointed appellate counsel for Orlando Venecilla Salas, has
2

filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Salas’s convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.25


 


EXTENSION


 


Pursuant
to that certain Convertible Promissory Note, dated January 31, 2019 (the “Note”), by BioLife4D Corporation (“Borrower”)
in favor of Millennium Automated Parking, Inc. (“Lender”), Lender has loaned to Borrower the sum of $20,000.00. Pursuant
to the Note, Borrower has the right to extend the Maturity Date (as defined in the Note) until January 31, 2024. Accordingly, Borrower
hereby extends the Maturity Date of the Note until January 31, 2024.


 


Dated:
January 12, 2022


 


BIOLIFE4D
CORPORATION


 


	BY: 
    	/s/
    Steven Morris	 
	 	Steven
    Morris, CEO
BE Alfalfa Crop Summary

BE Alfalfa Events in the Food Supply

BE Event Trait Producing 

Countries Comments FDA Review

J101 Herbicide 

Tolerance

Canada, Mexico, 

United States BNF-084

J163 Herbicide 

Tolerance

Canada, Mexico, 

United States BNF-084

KK179 low lignin Canada, United 

States

Trade name: 

HarvXtraTM BNF-138

BE Alfalfa Production

BE alfalfa is commercially produced in Canada and the United States. BE alfalfa is also approved 

for commercial cultivation in Mexico and Japan; however, no BE alfalfa is currently produced in 

these two countries. Producers of alfalfa sprouts should maintain records to demonstrate that 

they sourced non-BE alfalfa seed.

About 13% of the 2013 alfalfa harvest in the United States was BE alfalfa (USDA-ERS, 2016). 

ISAAA (2017) estimated that that there was 1.22M ha of BE alfalfa in the United States in 2017.

BE Alfalfa Food Safety Reviews

FDA biotechnology consultations were completed for events J101 and J163 in 2004, and for 

event KK179 in 2013 (FDA, 2018). Health Canada completed food safety reviews for events 

J101 and J163 in 2005 (Health Canada, 2005) and for event KK179 in 2015(Health Canada, 

2015). 

References

FDA (2018) Biotechnology Consultations on Food from GE Plant Varieties

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fdcc/?set=Biocon

Health Canada (2005) Novel Food Information – Glyphosate Tolerant Alfalfa Events J101 and 

J163

Health Canada (2015) Novel Food Information – Reduced Lignin Alfalfa KK179

ISAAA (2017) Global Status of Commercialized Biotech-GM Crops - 2017

USDA-ERS (2016) The Adoption of Genetically Engineered Alfalfa, Canola and Sugarbeets in the 

United States.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 670 

Recognizing the tenth anniversary of the enactment of the Paul Wellstone 

and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 9, 2018 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself, Mr. CASSIDY, Ms. SMITH, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. 

MURPHY, Mr. CARPER, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. DURBIN, Ms. STABENOW, 

Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. CARDIN, and Ms. COLLINS) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

OCTOBER 10, 2018 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the tenth anniversary of the enactment of the 

Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity 

and Addiction Equity Act of 2008. 

Whereas, on October 3, 2008, the Paul Wellstone and Pete 

Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity 

Act of 2008 (subtitle B of title V of Public Law 110– 

343) (referred to in this preamble as the ‘‘MHPAEA’’) 

was signed into law; 

Whereas the MHPAEA ensures that employer-based group 

health plans and group and individual health insurance 

issuers that provide mental health or substance use disVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:45 Oct 10, 2018 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR670.ATS SR670

daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 670 ATS 

order coverage do not impose less favorable limitations on 

mental health or substance abuse use disorder benefits 

than on medical or surgical benefits; 

Whereas parity protections have been found to decrease outof-pocket costs for mental health and substance use disorder services; 

Whereas, according to the Substance Abuse and Mental 

Health Services Administration, in 2017, 18,200,000 individuals in the United States ages 12 and older needed 

substance use treatment but did not receive specialty 

treatment in the past year; 

Whereas, in the United States in 2017, an estimated 2 out 

of 5 adults with any mental illness and 1⁄2 of adults with 

serious mental illness who had unmet needs for mental 

health services did not receive treatment because those 

individuals could not afford the cost of care; and 

Whereas parity in insurance coverage for behavioral health 

services consistent with the requirements of the 

MHPAEA can provide access to life-saving treatment and 

services: Now, therefore be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commemorates October 3, 2018, as the 

3 tenth anniversary of the enactment of the Paul 

4 Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity 

5 and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (subtitle B of title 

6 V of Public Law 110–343); 

7 (2) declares access to behavioral health services 

8 a priority; and 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 670 ATS 

1 (3) supports enforcement of the Paul Wellstone 

2 and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addic3 tion Equity Act of 2008 to protect individuals in the 

4 United States who are in need of access to insurance 

5 coverage for behavioral health services. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
FILED

October 27, 1997

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

ROBERT BEAN, FRANKLIN )

SHAFFER, DAVID AUTRY, )

MACK ROBERTS, KEVIN ANTLE, )

TOM NICHOLS, TAMMIE BEASLEY, )

and ROXANNE LUCE, )

)

Plaintiffs/Appellees, )

) DAVIDSON CHANCERY

v. )

)

NED RAY McWHERTER, in his ) Appeal No. 01S01-9607-CH-00132

capacity as Governor of the State of )

Tennessee, CHARLES W. BURSON, )

Attorney General of the State of )

Tennessee, TENNESSEE WILDLIFE )

RESOURCES COMMISSION, and )

GARY MYERS, Director of the )

Wildlife Resources Agency, )

)

Defendants/Appellants. )

ORDER ON PETITION TO REHEAR

A petition for rehearing has been filed on behalf of Plaintiffs/Appellees. After

consideration of the same, the Court is of the opinion that the petition should be and the

same is hereby denied at the cost of Plaintiffs/Appellees.

Enter this _____ day of October, 1997.

PER CURIAM
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 23
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 23
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 23
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 23
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 23
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 23
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 23
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 23
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 23
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 23
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 23
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 23
EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 23
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 14 of 23
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 15 of 23
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 16 of 23
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 17 of 23
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 18 of 23
EPA SANITIZED Page 19 of 23
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 20 of 23
EPA SANITIZED Page 21 of 23
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 22 of 23
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 23 of 23
P. 1


# OAR Box 1802 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 51 ) IV-E-46 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/4/2008 11:57:59 AM

Sheet 51 of 11 7P. 2 

# A- 10-3 D
U S EVIRONMENTA

L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y Office o f Air Qualit y Plannin g an

d Standard s Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a2771 1
Date : Februar

y 22,200 0 To : Ai r an d Radiatio n Docke

t #A-90-3 7 From : Denni s Crumpler , Integrate d Implementatio n Group , ITPID , MD-1 2 Re : Meeting wit

h Independen

t Powe r Producer s O n Septembe

r 29,1999 , th e EP

A met wit h representative s o f

independen

t powe r producer s IPP s (attende e lis t i s attached)
. The IPP s presente d acap-and-trade progra mtha t they though t woul d provid e acos t

effective approach t o gainin g th e sam e emission s reduction s a s pendin g enforcemen

t o f ol d regulation s an

d new approache s base d o

n emissio n target s and date

certai n installatio n o f

controls
. The

y als o advocate d tha

t new combustio n turbin e emissions , eve n without BACT , represent s abetter

emission s reductio n scenari o tha n encouragin g th e continue d used o f

ol d coal-fire d technologies
. cc : Pa mSmith , (MD-12 ) Jo n Devine , OG

C Attendees : Joe l Bluestein , EE

A Mar k Hall , Trigen Corporatio n Bill Hamett , OAQP S Davi d Solomon , OAQPS Denni s Crumpler , OAQP S Mik e Sewell , OAQP S Kare n Blanchard , OAQP S Tiffan y Elliot , EPS A Caro l Holmes , OEC

A Bruc e Buckheit , OEC

A Jo n Devine , OG

C Gre g Foote , OG

C EP A Office Abbreviations : OAQPS

- Office o f Ai r Qualit y Plannin g an

d Standards ; OGC-

- Office o f Genera l Counsel ; OECA-Offic e o f Enforcemen

t an d Complianc e Assurance
. 

# 1
Exhibit 10.1


 


JOINDER TO LETTER AGREEMENT


 


This Joinder to Letter Agreement (the “Agreement”)
is entered into on May 30, 2022.


 


By executing this Agreement,
the undersigned hereby agrees, as of the date first set forth above, that the undersigned shall become a party to that certain Letter
Agreement, dated October 28, 2021 (as may be amended or restated from time to time, the “Letter Agreement”), by and
among (i) SDCL EDGE Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”), (ii) SDCL EDGE Sponsor LLC, (iii) SDCL EDGE Sponsor Participation
LLP, (iv) Sustainable Investors Fund, LP, (v) Seaside Holdings (Nominee) Limited, (vi) Jonathan Maxwell, (vii) Michael Feldman, (viii)
Michael Naylor, (ix) Steven J. Gilbert, (x) William Kriegel, (xi) Lolita Jackson, (xii) Ned Davis, and (xiii) Ana Maria Machado Fernandes,
and shall be bound by, and entitled to the rights provided under, the terms and provisions of such sections of the Letter Agreement as
an Insider (as applicable and as defined therein).


 


This Agreement shall be governed
by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to conflicts of law principles
that would result in the application of the substantive laws of another jurisdiction. The parties hereto (i) all agree that any action,
proceeding, claim or dispute arising out of, or relating in any way to, this Agreement shall be brought and enforced in the courts of
New York City, in the State of New York, and irrevocably submit to such jurisdiction and venue, which jurisdiction and venue shall be
exclusive, and (ii) waive any objection to such exclusive jurisdiction and venue or that such courts represent an inconvenient forum.


 


[Signature page follows]


 






     


     


    

 





	 	/s/ Karl E. Olsoni
	 	Name: 	Karl E. Olsoni


 


ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:


 


	SDCL EDGE ACQUISITION CORPORATION	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Ned Davis	 
	Name: 	Ned Davis	 
	Title:	Chief Financial Officer	 


 


[Signature page to Joinder to Letter Agreement]