alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-889]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Surrender of License of Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of the Small 
Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to 
function as a small business investment company under the Small 
business Investment Company License No. 02/72-0623 issued to Red Rock 
Ventures II, L.P., and said license is hereby declared null and void.

United States Small Business Administration.
    Dated: October 27, 2011.
Sean J. Greene,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 2012-889 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
## U 

# ing th"s**manual**



## Download 1hl DJI 

## GO app

# Con nts u 

# • I 

### 2 L 2 2 

### 2 

## o.n GO 2 

### Product I PIG 

### 5**~** 6 2 ' 2 ' 2 ( AT 

### 3 .5 

# · a • J 

# ,. 7 R 23 • Con 

### 2 • Con 

### 2 3 ' 

### 32 • Con 

### 33 

# .

### 5 

# s FAO 57 

### 6

... 0

# Product Profile

c"D d

' 011 7

### cf'fOI'!C lfD (P12) "D (P'l!J) (P1 (I

' 011( ( [21)

### c

# Aircraft

LED

# ...

c

# - ... OJ I OO

'A

# ...

not 

### c

## 0

c 

# ., 

# - ...llilr:t CIIP('1348A)

### c 

# - ...

# ... GO



### c

# - ...**~LAM~~** ow..-'25**25~** 

### 50%-75%**751fl.-1~** BlalryPtc:AIICJbl-.m 

## c.. · ancrc**C~:".ca.ca** LED2 IOCO'"d**~** «cUU:OOteCIOO lED3 

### 0. LBl3 t.ITiCS per socxni

# ro er Thi ch



### c

## Remote Control'ler

### c

### c

# ,



# ·---· I "- -t



### c

# >) OPP 

## i'§>

# v T 2254 

## Ramola Collboller 

## Slllue LED

c

### 0



### > )

## > )



### c

### pi 

## s

# Cam ra and Gimbal

cI I 

# .:rueD I

### e ) 

## >

. .. .• 11/r • 

### ..... 

### ..... , . 

# ..,. ..

,...w 

# - -o**"~** 

# f.,.: . :**-~** 

# . .. .. •\ 

## ,

- ---- -



### c $1

### Th . c ap1or 

### dcscr • b s ho**f~** 

### r 

### ma i n 

### GUI 

### o1 the 

### IDJI GO 

### app .

## I GOApp



# - 

# - 1 0( 1 ]

( 1


### c

### G . 0 ( 1

### 1 1
0



### c... 0

# F ght n



### c

### { ) 2) 

# ... v ...**O.UGO~**

### c 4 1

### c

### 3

### 0



### c $

# I FAQ

# Troubleshooting (FAQ) 2 . 3 .


### 7 . I)

2. CM**UIII'I~** ..,., 

### tu II !'.Nnnd lft"l"'nlft lf"fftti"'1W'oftt 'tJ 

## w GO

171

# .. . :5 .



### c

# Appendix

# Appendix (P ) M 

## • m M 22 ro 120 M 1 8 DJI !) DJI1 5 

## c "" 

# . cISO 

### rov ) 0

T
[ 

## raso 12 

### 12: 1 

### oo-3200**~)** 10). s 

### ' s:tty 2ln'mf3Smm
FAl:rl;**~Al** fhleo ..FEG ONG , (pho'J))**....,.;.-~IV** (l.'FEG..41 AVCIH**~)** 

## so G8 10CM IJi$.1 Fi C1tl.odtl En&Yg;o Opefa• 0**D~** DJI 9W 3-..- 410'**~·c t'TW'W"'~**  22* lO**~** 

### c l8t1 22_2 I L9 S1t)**.~ ~c**  

### cr ao 40" 

### c TB48 S100 228 I ES • !)lo.w'C**~·c** 22*C 2rC



### c

### c

### c
Served: January 30, 2014 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

------------------------------------------------------------

ERA AVIATION, INC.,

and

HAGELAND AVIATION SERVICES, INC.

------------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME

On January 3, 2014, Era Aviation, Inc. (“Era”), Frontier Flying Service, Inc. (“Frontier”), and Hageland 

Aviation Services, Inc. (“Hageland”), each of which is a U.S. certificated air carrier and under common 

ownership,1 requested that the Department register the trade name “Ravn Alaska.” On the same date 

Frontier and Hageland also requested that the Department register the trade name “Ravn Connect.”2

Part 215 of the Department’s regulations (14 CFR Part 215) provides that any air carrier wishing to use an 

alternative trade name must first register that name with the Department. The rule further states that the 

Department may register such name after the air carrier gives notification to similarly named air carriers 

of the proposed use of the name. In this case, we identified no similarly named air carriers.

A condition of this notice is that the Joint Applicants agreed to make all required disclosures of the 

identity of the operating air carrier by its corporate name and any other name under which service is held 

out to the public, in all written or electronic schedule information, Official Airline Guides and comparable 

publications, applicable computer reservation systems and on oral notice to consumers. We reserve the 

right to reevaluate the manner in which the trade names are implemented to ensure all consumer 

protection mechanisms are in place.

Under these circumstances, we acknowledge the registration of the trade name “Ravn Alaska” by Era and 

“Ravn Alaska” and “Ravn Connect” by Hageland for immediate use in their operations. 

Dated at Washington, D.C., January 30, 2014.

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at

http://www.regulations.gov

 1 Era’s certificate authority has been reissued, most recently by Order 2006-4-23, issued April, 25, 2006. Frontier’s and 

Hageland’s certificate authority was last reissued by Order 98-7-6, issued July 8, 1998.

2 We will handle Frontier’s trade name requests in a separate notice.
Attachment 

SERVICE LIST FOR

ERA AVIATION, INC.,

FRONTIER FLYING SERVICE, INC.,

and

HAGELAND AVIATION SERVICES, INC.

ROBERT H HUME JR

LANDYE BENNETT BLUMSTEIN

701 W 8TH AVENUE SUTE 1200

ANCHORAGE AK 99501

ROBERT M HAJDUKOVICH

PRESIDENT AND CEO

4700 OLD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTS 

ROAD

ANCHORAGE AK 99507

ROGER G BROWN

POI FOR ERA AVIATION INC 

RUDEE SCOTT

PMI FOR ERA AVIATION INC

CHRISTOPHER X FARNELL

POI FOR FRONTIER FLYING SERVICE INC

MATTHEW S FISHER

POI FOR FRONTIER FLYING SERVICE INC

DANNY O’DELL

POI FOR HAGELAND AVIATION

 SERVICES INC

ROY I REDIFER

PMI FOR HAGELAND AVIATION 

 SERVICES INC

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RITA/BTS E-34

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 148 (Friday, August 1, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 44769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18272]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9016-2]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 07/21/2014 Through 07/25/2014
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20140202, Final EIS, NPS, MD, Antietam National Battlefield, 
Monocacy National Battlefield, Manassas National Battlefield Park, 
Final White-tailed Deer Management Plan, Review Period Ends: 09/03/
2014, Contact: Tracy Atkins 303-969-2325.
EIS No. 20140203, Final EIS, USFS, CO, Gore Creek Restoration, Review 
Period Ends: 09/02/2014, Contact: Doug Myhre 970-638-4178.
EIS No. 20140204, Final EIS, USACE, NC, Village of Bald Head Island 
Shoreline Stabilization Project, Review Period Ends: 09/02/2014, 
Contact: Ronnie Smith 910-251-4829.
EIS No. 20140205, Final EIS, USFWS, OH, Ballville Dam Project, Review 
Period Ends: 09/02/2014, Contact: Brian Elkington 612-713-5168.
EIS No. 20140206, Draft EIS, FHWA, NY, Portageville Bridge Project, 
Comment Period Ends: 09/15/2014, Contact: Jonathan McDade 518-431-4127.
EIS No. 20140207, Final EIS, USACE, SC, Haile Gold Mine Project, Review 
Period Ends: 09/02/2014, Contact: Dr. Richard L. Darden 843-329-8043.
EIS No. 20140208, Final EIS, NOAA, MI, Thunder Bay National Marine 
Sanctuary Boundary Expansion, Review Period Ends: 09/02/2014, Contact: 
Helene Scalliet 301-713-7281.
EIS No. 20140209, Draft EIS, USACE, CA, San Elijo Lagoon Restoration 
Project, Comment Period Ends: 09/29/2014, Contact: Meris Bantilan-Smith 
760-602-4836.

    Dated: July 29, 2014.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2014-18272 Filed 7-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
1 

### Jones, Keira (FAA)

From: Gonzalez, Will (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 4:22 PM

To: Jones, Keira (FAA)

Cc: Abbott, Deke (FAA); Mason, Mary (FAA); Fr enzel, Robert (FAA); Filippell, Michael E (FAA); Thompson, Mary (FAA) Subject: FW: Flight Trails

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

Keira,

See e

‐ mail from Mr. Tyner below concerning Flight Trails. They are withdrawing their petition. Is there anything else

you need from them or us to close this out?



### Regards,

Will Gonzalez ASI, AFS-220

202-267-4080

From: Terry Tyner [ mailto:tyner65@gmail.com ]

Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 4:17 PM

To: Gonzalez, Will (FAA) Subject: Re:



### Hi Will,

I received a call from the KRG representative, stating that our training services would not be needed. The original plan of training the kurdist an pilots towards FAA Certificates has been cancelled by the KRG-MOI office. We explained we are close to approvals but they stated that they can not wait any longer and are obtaining Iraqi C of A's for the aircraft and will utilize Iraqi qualified pilots for their operation.

This is upsetting as we put a lot of work in this and tried to accommodate training them towards US

Certificates.

At this time Flight Trails Helicopters, Inc. would like to cancel the reques t for petition and th ank you for all of your help in working towards this goal.

Thank you again for your help,

Terry Tyner

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:10 PM, < Will.Gonzalez@faa.gov > wrote:

Hi Terry,
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRIAN K. CARTER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

OATH HOLDINGS, INC.,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 18

- 17318

D.C. No. 4:17

- cv

- 07086

- KAW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Kandis A. Westmore, Magistrate Judge, Presiding **

Submitted December 11, 2019 ** *

Before: WALLACE

, CANBY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges

.

Brian K. Carter appeals pro se f rom the district court’s judgment dismissing

his action alleging trademark infringement claims

. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291

. We affirm

.

* This disposition is not appropr iate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28

U.S.C. § 636(c).

** * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 18 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 18

- 17318

The district court did not abuse its discretion by striking Carter’s filing

challenging defendant’s co rrection in its notice of removal of the proper named

defendant, or by denying Carter’s motions for “award of compensation.” See

Ready Transp., Inc. v. AAR Mfg., Inc. , 627 F.3d 402, 404 (9th Cir. 2010) ( setting

forth standard of review and explaining that a district court ha s inherent power to

control its docket, including power to strike items from the docket ).

In his opening brief, C arter fails to raise, and therefore has waived, any

challenge to the district court’s dismissal of his action. See Indep. Towers of Wash.

v. Washington , 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[W]e will not consider any

claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief.”); Acosta

- Huerta

v. Estelle , 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir. 1993) (issues not supported by argument in pro

se appellant’s opening brief are waived ).

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofRiskMetrics Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2008, as filed wit the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1.     |   | The Report, fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                             |
| 2.     |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Registrant.        |

 
| Date: November 5, 2008     |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |   |
| /s/ David M. Obstler            |   |
| David M. Obstler                |   |
| *(Principal Financial Officer)* |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 31

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Denis Iler, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of INTREorg Systems, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant and I have:

    a)     designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure that
           material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,  including  its
           consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
           entities,  particularly  during the  period in which  this  quarterly
           report is being prepared;

    b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
           and  procedures  as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
           of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c)     presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
           the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
           the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

    a)     all  significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
           controls which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
           record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
           identified for the registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
           internal controls; and

    b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
           employees who have a  significant role in  the  registrant's internal
           controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report
whether or not there were significant  changes in internal  controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 19, 2008


By:      /s/ Denis Iler
         ----------------------------------
         Denis Iler
         Principal Executive Officer and President
Order entered July 26 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00248
- CV
YELENA KONKINA , Appellant

V.
DR. IRINA HAYRAPETYAN AND VALLEY VIEW DENTAL , Appellee s

On A p peal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 20
- 02483
- C

O RDER
T he repo rter ’ s recor d in this case is overdue. By postcard dated June 23,
2021 , we notified Janet Wright, Official Court Repo rter for County Court at Law
N o 3, that the reporter’s record was overdue and directed her to file the reporter’s
record with in thirty days. The same day, app ellant filed a notice with the Court indicating that she had requested the record and had left multiple messages for Ms.
W r ight regarding the reporter ’ s record

.To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed and Ms. Wright has not

corresponded with the Court regarding the rep orter’s record. Because our records indicate appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of c o sts and that she has requested the record, we ORDER J anet Wright, to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, either (1) the reporter’s record; or (2) written verification
no hear ings were recorded

. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this o rder to:
Honorable Sally Montgomery Presiding Judge County Court at Law No. 3 Janet Wright O fficial Court Reporter C ounty Court at Law N o. 3 All parties

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of BOOMERS CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT, INC (the Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report"), I, Bruce Ellsworth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: July 14, 2005                     /s/ Bruce Ellsworth

--------------------------



Bruce Ellsworth



Chief Executive Officer
2023 Industry Meeting Agenda

Wednesday, September 6, 2023

Time Event Description

8:00 - 9:30 Registration Refreshments

9:30 - 9:40 Opening and Welcome Year to Date Accomplishments

9:40 - 10:20 Looking Ahead Modernization and the Future of Commodity 

Procurement

10:20 - 10:45 FNS Initiatives Process for selecting USDA Foods

10:45 - 11:05 Customer Feedback Challenges

11:05 - 1200 CPP and Contracting Updates Master Solicitation, Other Improvements

1200 - 1:15 Lunch Potbelly's Box Lunches

LP Breakout Session DGO Breakout Session

1:30 - 3:00

LP/SSD/QAD/FNS Dairy Grading Clinic

Welcome - Section 32 Request/Animal 

Handling State Requirements/

Domestic Origin / Economic Outlook/

Complaints & Rejected Loads

FGIS 

Technology Initiatives 

Rice Grading Demonstration

6:00 Networking Kansas City Power & Light District KC Live! - The 

Living Room - Google Maps
Thursday, September 7, 2023

8:00 - 9:30 Registration/Room Assignments Refreshments

LP Breakout Session

9:30 - 1:00 Livestock Micro Testing/Specification Updates/Modification 

Request

9:30 - 1:00 Poultry/Egg Specification Updates/Modification Request/Egg 

Temperatures

9:30 - 1:00 Aquatics Specification Updates/Modification Request

DGO Breakout Session

9:30 - 10:00 Opening Remarks Review and AMS Update

10:00 – 11:00 DGO Overview Updates/Overview

11:00 – 12:00 Offshore Overview of Offshore Solicitations

12:00 - 1:00 Open Forum Vendor Questions & Answers

Both Days WBSCM Help Desk 1 on 1 Training with WBSCM

We highly value your par�cipa�on and look forward to seeing you at the mee�ng!
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, Mark Pettie, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable, and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc.




/s/Mark PettieName:  Mark PettieTitle:    Chief Executive OfficerDate:    August 10, 2009
#### Gary Owens WEBB, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-78-530.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

June 5, 1980.

*286Bill Sexton and Ronald A. Callicott, Law-ton, for appellant.

Jan Eric Cartwright, Atty. Gen., William S. Flanagan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jim Wilcox-en, Legal Intern, for appellee.

OPINION

BRETT, Judge:

The appellant was convicted of Robbery With Firearms in the District Court, Comanche County, in Case No. CRF-77-1169. His principal assignment on appeal is that his defense attorney did not represent him effectively; but this Court has examined the trial transcript and it is our opinion that the appellant was ably represented by his trial counsel. We cannot agree with the appellant’s assertion that his attorney was ill-prepared. The attorney vigorously cross-examined the State’s witnesses and attempted to impeach their credibility with references to prior statements and preliminary hearing testimony. Defense counsel’s questioning was not rambling and confused, as the appellant now asserts. Also contrary to the appellant’s claim, the record is not “remarkably free from objections.” The appellant’s attorney did not hesitate to object when he believed that an objection was necessary. In addition, defense witnesses were presented in an attempt to undercut the State’s case, which was very strong. Whether or not the voir dire and opening and closing arguments should be recorded is a question of trial tactics. Certainly, in this case the decision not to have those portions of the trial recorded is not sufficient ground to show ineffective counsel for reversal. See *Baker v. State,*Okl.Cr., 593 P.2d 100 (1979).

The appellant cites cases from this State and from the State of Washington which apply the “farce or mockery” test of inadequate counsel; and that is currently the test in this state. See, for instance, *Padillow v. State,*Okl.Cr., 501 P.2d 837 (1972). On the other hand, some jurisdictions are moving to adopt a more demanding test. See, for instance, *Dyer*v. *Crisp,*613 F.2d 275 (10th Cir. 1980). Although this Court is presently adhering to the “farce or mockery” test, we are of the opinion that the representation this appellant received at his trial was better than merely competent. Even under a more expansive test, we would hold the appellant’s representation adequate.

The only other issue put before this Court is that subsequent to his conviction the appellant cooperated with law enforcement authorities in solving a homicide. This matter is unrelated to the appellant’s own case and is not a matter for this Court to consider.

*287The judgment and sentence is *AFFIRMED.*

CORNISH, P. J., and BUSSEY, J., concur.