alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U. S. Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF COTTON

FOR RELEASE AT 1:00 P.M. CT December 12, 2019

USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of Cotton. The cotton bales were sold under 

Invitation 2020U0013 dated December 5, 2019.

Invitation 2020U0013

Catalog 

Lot No. Catalog Location Purchaser Pounds Sold 

Price Sold 

(per Pound) CCC Revenue 

3 ALTUS, OK ALLENBERG COTTON CO. 35,867 0.4822 $ 17,295.07 

4 ALTUS, OK ALLENBERG COTTON CO. 124,690 0.5500 $ 68,579.50 

5 ALTUS, OK BACO TRADING INC. 123,085 0.5840 $ 71,881.64 

6 ALTUS, OK BACO TRADING INC. 122,595 0.5840 $ 71,595.48 

7 ALTUS, OK BACO TRADING INC. 51,505 0.5840 $ 30,078.92 

8 ALTUS, OK ALLENBERG COTTON CO. 44,901 0.6250 $ 28,063.13 

9 BRYAN, TX BRIGHANN MARKETING INC. 5,158 0.4004 $ 2,065.26 

10 BRYAN, TX BRIGHANN MARKETING INC. 18,895 0.4004 $ 7,565.56 

11 Portland, TX BRIGHANN MARKETING INC. 475 0.4004 $ 190.19 

12 Portland, TX BRIGHANN MARKETING INC. 6,320 0.4004 $ 2,530.53 

14 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX ALLENBERG COTTON CO. 111,026 0.5600 $ 62,174.56 

16 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX BRIGHANN MARKETING INC. 477 0.4004 $ 190.99 

17 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX BRIGHANN MARKETING INC. 4,362 0.4004 $ 1,746.54 

19 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX ALLENBERG COTTON CO. 68,047 0.5099 $ 34,697.17 

21 EL CAMPO, TX ALLENBERG COTTON CO. 106,783 0.5000 $ 53,391.50 

22 EL CAMPO, TX ALLENBERG COTTON CO. 8,517 0.5304 $ 4,517.42 

25 TAYLOR, TX BRIGHANN MARKETING INC. 9,470 0.4004 $ 3,791.79 

26 TAYLOR, TX BRIGHANN MARKETING INC. 12,382 0.4004 $ 4,957.75 

854,555 $465,312.99
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly Report of West Coast Car Company
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert Worthington, Chief Executive Officer of the small business issuer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the small
business issuer.



/s/ Daniel Drummond
-----------------------
Robert Worthington
Chief Executive Officer

OCT 11, 2006
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 664 

Designating October 8, 2018, as ‘‘National Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 1 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 28), 2018 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself, Mr. COONS, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. GARDNER, Mr. 

PORTMAN, and Mr. MURPHY) submitted the following resolution; which 

was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating October 8, 2018, as ‘‘National Hydrogen and 

Fuel Cell Day’’. 

Whereas hydrogen, which has an atomic mass of 1.008, is the 

most abundant chemical substance in the universe; 

Whereas the United States is a world leader in the development and deployment of fuel cell and hydrogen technologies; 

Whereas hydrogen fuel cells played an instrumental role in 

the United States space program, helping the United 

States achieve the mission of landing a man on the moon; 

Whereas private industry, Federal and State governments, 

national laboratories, and institutions of higher education 

continue to improve fuel cell and hydrogen technologies 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 664 ATS 

to address the most pressing energy, environmental, and 

economic issues of the United States; 

Whereas fuel cells utilizing hydrogen and hydrogen-rich fuels 

to generate electricity are clean, efficient, and resilient 

technologies being sold for stationary and backup power, 

zero-emission light duty motor vehicles and buses, industrial vehicles, and portable power; 

Whereas stationary fuel cells are being placed in service for 

continuous and backup power to provide business and energy consumers with reliable power in the event of grid 

outages; 

Whereas stationary fuel cells can help reduce water use, as 

compared to traditional power generation technologies; 

Whereas fuel cell electric light duty motor vehicles and buses 

that utilize hydrogen can completely replicate the experience of internal combustion vehicles, including comparable range and refueling times; 

Whereas hydrogen fuel cell industrial vehicles are being deployed at logistical hubs and warehouses across the 

United States and exported to facilities in Europe and 

Asia; 

Whereas hydrogen is a nontoxic gas that can be derived from 

a variety of domestically available traditional and renewable resources, including solar, wind, biogas, and the 

abundant supply of natural gas in the United States; 

Whereas hydrogen and fuel cells can store energy to help enhance the grid and maximize opportunities to deploy renewable energy; 

Whereas the United States produces and uses more than 

11,000,000 metric tons of hydrogen per year; and 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 664 ATS 

Whereas engineers and safety code and standard professionals have developed consensus-based protocols for safe 

delivery, handling, and use of hydrogen: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates October 8, 

2 2018, as ‘‘National Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Day’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
Order entered November 16, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01271-CV

No. 05-17-01273-CV

No. 05-17-01274-CV

No. 05-17-01275-CV

No. 05-17-01276-CV

IN RE JAMES H. GENTRY, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 199-81623-07, 199-81624-07, 199-81625-07, 

199-81626-07, and 199-81627-07

ORDER

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Myers, and Boatright

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus.

/s/ JASON BOATRIGHT 

JUSTICE
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 79 

Designating March 2, 2017, as ‘‘Read Across America Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2, 2017 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. REED, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. CARPER, Mr. 

COCHRAN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. TILLIS, and Mrs. CAPITO) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating March 2, 2017, as ‘‘Read Across America Day’’. 

Whereas reading is a basic requirement for quality education 

and professional success and a source of pleasure 

throughout life; 

Whereas the people of the United States must be able to read 

if the United States is to remain competitive in the global 

economy; 

Whereas Congress has placed great emphasis on reading 

intervention and providing additional resources for reading assistance, including through the programs authorized under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.) and through annual appropriations for library and literacy programs; and 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 79 ATS 

Whereas more than 50 national organizations concerned 

about reading and education have joined with the National Education Association to designate March 2, the 

anniversary of the birth of Theodor Geisel (commonly 

known as ‘‘Dr. Seuss’’), as a day to celebrate reading: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates March 2, 2017, as ‘‘Read Across 

3 America Day’’; 

4 (2) honors— 

5 (A) Theodor Geisel (commonly known as 

6 ‘‘Dr. Seuss’’) for his success in encouraging 

7 children to discover the joy of reading; and 

8 (B) the 20th anniversary of Read Across 

9 America Day; and 

10 (3) encourages— 

11 (A) parents to read with their children for 

12 at least 30 minutes on Read Across America 

13 Day in honor of the commitment of the Senate 

14 to building a country of readers; and 

15 (B) the people of the United States to ob16 serve Read Across America Day with appro17 priate ceremonies and activities. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 90

Authorizing the printing of a revised and updated version of the House

document entitled ‘‘Hispanic Americans in Congress’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 29, 2001

Mr. SERRANO (for himself, Mr. REYES, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. ORTIZ, Ms.

ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. PASTOR, Mr. BECERRA, Mr. BONILLA, Mr. DIAZBALART, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. UNDERWOOD, Ms.

VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Ms. SANCHEZ, Mr. BACA,

Mr. GONZALEZ, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. SOLIS, Mr. ACEVEDO-VILA ́, and

Mr. HOYER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the printing of a revised and updated version

of the House document entitled ‘‘Hispanic Americans

in Congress’’.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. PRINTING OF REVISED VERSION OF ‘‘HISPANIC

4 AMERICANS IN CONGRESS’’.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—An updated version of House

6 Document 103–299, entitled ‘‘Hispanic Americans in Con7 gress’’ (as revised by the Library of Congress), shall be
2

•HCON 90 IH

1 printed as a House document by the Public Printer, with

2 illustrations and suitable binding, under the direction of

3 the Committee on House Administration of the House of

4 Representatives.

5 (b) NUMBER OF COPIES.—In addition to the usual

6 number, there shall be printed 30,700 copies of the docu7 ment referred to in subsection (a), of which—

8 (1) 25,000 shall be for the use of the Com9 mittee on House Administration of the House of

10 Representatives; and

11 (2) 5,700 shall be for the use of the Committee

12 on Rules and Administration of the Senate.

Æ
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert Matthew RIDDICK, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 80SA350.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

March 30, 1981.

Rehearing Denied April 27, 1981.

Robert L. Russel, Dist. Atty., David H. Zook, Deputy Dist. Atty., Colorado Springs, for plaintiff-appellant.

No appearance for defendant-appellee.

ERICKSON, Justice.

Pursuant to section 16-12-102, C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8), the district attorney of El Paso County has appealed the dismissal of an information charging the defendant with accessory after the fact, section 18-8-105, C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8). The defendant, Robert Matthew Riddick, was previously charged, tried, and acquitted of attempted aggravated robbery, sections 18-2-101 and 18-4-302, C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8), and conspiracy to commit aggravated robbery, sections 18-2-201 and 18-4-302, C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8).

After holding a full hearing, the trial court concluded section 18-1-408(2), C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8) and Crim.P. 8(a), precluded the prosecution from pursuing a second prosecution, since the accessory charge could have been included in the first information. The criminal episode, which was the subject of both charges, centered on an aborted attempt to rob the Three Thieves Restaurant.

The court found that the district attorney had sufficient information to support the accessory charge at the time the original prosecution was instituted, and concluded that the accessory charge should be dismissed because of the failure of the district attorney to cause that charge to be joined with the initial charges against the defendant.

In our view, the trial judge’s conclusions are supported by the record. The prosecution’s basis for a second prosecution is without merit and fully answered in *Jeffrey*v. *District Court,*Colo., 626 P.2d 631 (1981). *See also, Ruth v. County Ct.,*198 Colo. 6, *642595 P.2d 237 (1979). No good purpose would be served by expanding our discussion of issues with no precedential value and which should not have been brought before us under the provisions of section 16-12-102. *See People v. Waggoner,*Colo., 610 P.2d 106 (1980); *People v. Maestas,*196 Colo. 245, 586 P.2d 4 (1978). *See also, People v. Denver Athletic Club,*63 Colo. 189, 164 P. 1158 (1917).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
From: Dave Eccleston [mailto:delmarvarecyclinginc@comcast.net] 

Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 6:21 PM 

To: Bahner, Mark A. 

Subject: RE: Aluminum sweat furnaces in MD?

 

Mark,

Thank you for your inquiry. I will have to check our website. We have not operated sweat furnaces in years and 

they in general are going the way of the dinosaur in our industry. With the advent of shredders and the eddy 

recovery systems the need for the large sweat furnaces are lessened. I’m not sure if Maryland has any and if so 

maybe only one or two left. I would start with our national organization as a source of information. It would have 

most of the large players as members. www.isri.org I do know that there could be many small sweat furnaces in 

operation in the smaller yard, we even had one up until around 2000. These are small units that can melt items 

around the size of a car rim, one at a time, and in many cases fall under any reporting or regulatory requirements.

Good luck,

Dave

David N. Eccleston, VP

Delmarva Recycling, Inc

909 Boundary Street

Salisbury, MD 21801

From: Bahner, Mark A. [mailto:bahner@rti.org] 

Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 2:40 PM 

To: Decclest@delmarvarecycling.com 

Subject: Aluminum sweat furnaces in MD?

 

Dear Mr. Eccleston:

I work for RTI, International. My company does contract research for the U.S. EPA. We are interested in getting 

an idea of the number and locations of sweat furnaces in the U.S. My understanding from your website is that 

your company currently operates two sweat furnaces at your Boundary Street location (and only at that location). 

Or is this incorrect?

http://delmarvarecycling.com/contact/contact.htm

Do you have any estimate of the number of sweat furnaces operating in your state or in the U.S., or could you 

suggest someone to contact who might be able to estimate those numbers?

Thank you,

Mark Bahner

Research 

Page 1 of 2

mhtml:file://\\rtifile02.rcc_nt.rti.org\ehe\Projects\0210426-EPA_SPPD_(Opt4)\0210426.00... 1/10/2012
Mark A. Bahner 

RTI, International 

P.O. Box 12194, 3040 Cornwallis Road 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194 

Phone: (919) 541-6016 

Fax: (919) 541-7155 

Email: bahner@rti.org 

Internet: http://www.rti.org 

 

Page 2 of 2

mhtml:file://\\rtifile02.rcc_nt.rti.org\ehe\Projects\0210426-EPA_SPPD_(Opt4)\0210426.00... 1/10/2012
United States Department of Agriculture 

 Marketing and Regulatory Programs 

 Agricultural Marketing Service 

 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 

 Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration 

 Directive MRP 5400.2 10/23/07 

ALLOCATING PARKING SPACES AT FIELD LOCATIONS

1. PURPOSE 

 This Directive states the policy for allocating agency-owned or agency-controlled 

parking spaces at field locations. It does not apply to locations where parking is 

controlled by the General Services Administration or another Government agency. 

Changes in parking may incur bargaining obligations. 

2. HIGHLIGHTS 

 This Directive clarifies the Marketing and Regulatory Programs (MRP) policy on 

allocating parking spaces and payment of parking fees. 

3. AUTHORITY 

 Federal Management Regulation (41 CFR 102-74.300 and 102-74.305). 

4. POLICY 

a. It is MRP policy to allocate available parking spaces to employees in the 

following order of priority: 

 (1) Privately owned vehicles of severely handicapped employees who cannot 

 use public transportation. 

(2) Persons who work unusual hours (not to exceed 10 percent of MRP 

spaces). 

 (3) Vanpool/carpool vehicles. 

(4) Privately owned vehicles of employees that are regularly used for 

 Government business at least 12 days per month and that qualify for 

 reimbursement of mileage and travel expenses under Government Travel 

 Regulations. 

 (5) Government-owned or -leased vehicles and visitors’ parking. 

Distribution: AMS, APHIS, GIPSA Originating Office: ASD-RPPB
b. It is MRP policy that employees pay for parking of privately owned vehicles 

 when there is a direct charge to either the Agency or the employee. The 

exceptions are for: 

 (1) Privately owned vehicles regularly used for Government business. 

 These are vehicles used 12 or more workdays per month for Government 

 business for which employees receive reimbursement for mileage and 

 parking fees under the Government Travel Regulations. 

 (2) Privately owned vehicles of agency employees whose official duty station 

 is a U.S. Border Station. These vehicles are used by employees to 

 commute to work at the various U.S. border stations. Parking of these 

 vehicles will be permitted when spaces are available. 

 

 c. APHIS will pay for all Government-owned or -leased vehicle parking. 

5. INQUIRIES 

a. Direct inquiries about this Directive to the Administrative Services Division, 

Programs, Policy and Systems Branch, at 301-734-8468. 

b. This Directive is available on the following websites: 

 APHIS website at www.aphis.usda.gov/library 

 AMS Administrative Issuances home page at www.ams.usda.gov/issuances

 GIPSA Directives and Notices page at www.gipsa.usda.gov

/s/ 

William J. Hudnall 

Deputy Administrator 

MRP Business Services 

Page 2
. 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Kenneth G. Townsend, President, Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer of McNab Creek Gold Corp., certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB ofMcNab Creek Gold Corp.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for thesmall business issuer and have:

(a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

(b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the small businessissuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)    disclosed in this report any change in the smallbusiness issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small businessissuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the smallbusiness issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

(a)    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 

 

November 15, 2006    

/s/Kenneth G.Townsend                  

Date

Kenneth G. Townsend,

President, C.E.O. and C.F.O.
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATIONS








I, Jason C. Behnke, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust 2022-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.





Date:  March 21, 2024


/s/ Jason C. BehnkeJason C. BehnkeVice President - Assistant TreasurerFord Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer(senior officer in charge of servicing function)