alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 449

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 25, 2002

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for representation by Congress at a special meeting

in New York, New York, on Friday, September 6, 2002.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That: (a) The Speaker of the House of Rep3 resentatives (in consultation with the Minority Leader of

4 the House of Representatives), with respect to the House

5 of Representatives, and the President pro tempore of the
2

HCON 449 RDS

1 Senate (in consultation with the Majority Leader and the

2 Minority Leader of the Senate), with respect to the Sen3 ate, may send such Representatives, Senators and other

4 appropriate persons, to a special meeting of Congress and

5 related events to be held on Friday, September 6, 2002

6 in New York, New York, in remembrance of the terrorist

7 attacks of September 11, 2001, and in recognition of the

8 City of New York for the harm it sustained and its recov9 ery.

10 (b) Attendees under subsection (a) shall be led by the

11 Speaker and the Minority Leader of the House of Rep12 resentatives, and by the President pro tempore (or his des13 ignee), Majority Leader, and the Minority Leader of the

14 Senate.

15 SEC. 2. The Congress may accept the offer of the City

16 of New York and entities controlled by the City of New

17 York to host and pay the expenses of the Congress to pre18 pare, attend, and participate in the special meeting of Sep19 tember 6, 2002, and related events of that day, referred

20 to in section 1.

21 SEC. 3. On behalf of the Congress, the officers of the

22 House of Representatives and the officers of the Senate

23 may make arrangements with the City of New York and

24 other required entities and agencies for participation by
3

HCON 449 RDS

1 the Congress for the purposes designated under this reso2 lution.

Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 2002.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
#### Claude E. HUTCHISON and Ollie Lee Hutchison, Appellants, v. Bill McCLURE and David Sewell, d/b/a M & S Coal Company, Donald L. Gibson and Ina Kay Gibson, Appellees.

No. 53077.

Court of Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1.

June 17, 1980.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 5, 1980.

Certiorari Denied Nov. 3, 1980.

Released for Publication by Order of Court of Appeals Nov. 6, 1980.

Boatman, Laub, Martin & Stringer by Billy L. Martin, Okmulgee, for appellants.

Frederick L. Boss, Jr., Tulsa, for appel-lees Bill McClure and David Sewell, d/b/a M & S Coal Co.

Bailey, Romine & Seacat by Mary Bailey Romine, Okmulgee, for appellees Donald L. Gibson and Ina Kay Gibson.

REYNOLDS, Presiding Judge:

Claude E. Hutchison and Ollie Lee Hut-chison (Appellants) appeal the trial court’s determination that Appellants’ 1964 Warranty Deed to Appellees’ predecessor in title did not reserve in them a one-half interest in the coal underlying the property.

That basic facts are not in dispute. The parties stipulated that a conveyance or reservation of “oil, gas, and other minerals” standing along does not include coal, citing *Sloan v. Peabody Coal Co.,*547 F.2d 115 (10th Cir. 1977). The trial court properly applied the provisions of Title 16 O.S.1971, § 19, and the rule set out in *Sloan*when it determined that Appellants’ 1964 Warranty Deed containing a reservation of “oil, gas, and other minerals” did not reserve in Appellants an interest in the coal. AFFIRMED.

BOX and ROMANG, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 4.2



 


 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated June 9, 2022, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2115 contained in Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-263558) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


June 9, 2022
# Adopted -

April 30, 2008San Joaquin Valley Air Pollu tion Control District

1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue

Fresno, CA 93726

(559) 230-5800

www.valle y

air.or g
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aurelio Resource Corporation. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen B. Doppler, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 19, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen B. Doppler 
|                    |  |  |  | Stephen B. Doppler     
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement is required by Section 906 has been provided to Aurelio Resource
Corporation and will be retained by Aurelio Resource Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 706 

To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of 

Jacob R. Kent, et al., v. R.L. Vallee, Inc., et al. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 26, 2018 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel 

in the case of Jacob R. Kent, et al., v. R.L. Vallee, 

Inc., et al. 

Whereas, in the case of Jacob R. Kent, et al., v. R.L. Vallee, 

Inc., et al., Case No. 617–6–15, pending in the Superior 

Court of Vermont in Chittenden County, defendant R.L. 

Vallee, Inc. has issued a deposition subpoena for testimony and documents to Daniel McLean, an employee in 

Senator Sanders’ office; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent current or former Members, officers, and employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 706 ATS 

request for testimony or documents relating to their official responsibilities; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be 

taken from such control or possession but by permission 

of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is author2 ized to represent Senator Sanders’ office and Mr. McLean 

3 in this matter and in all proceedings related to it. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
P.O. BOX12308,CAPITOLSTATION

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

OFFICIAL BUSINESS

STATE OF TEXAS p

PENALTY FOR

PRIVATE USE

RE: WR-82,824-01

KENNETH WAYNE BEAL

22715 IMPERIAL VALLEY

HOUSTON, TX 77073

£ - — v

02 1R

0006557458 MAR 2

MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 

UTF

HO BOU-S3B 77073 if- »iv*i"i•••"M-»i »:«>» it-*i--:» iji1!*i*»Jj•;»i"iv'',""f pr-1-*-11 *;»i'r*i irit-*
**EXHIBIT 32.3**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**




**PURSUANT
      TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**









I,
      Peter
      C. Mann, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Amendment No. 1 to
      the
      quarterly report of Prestige Brands International, LLC on Form 10-Q/A for the
      period ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable, and that
      information contained in such quarterly report fairly presents in all material
      respects the financial condition and results of operations of Prestige Brands
      International, LLC.




**/s/
                P****eter****C. M****ann**Name:Peter
                C. MannTitle:Chairman
                and Chief Executive OfficerDate:January
                12, 2006
November 4, 2015 

Dear Mr. Duisenberg: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA-2015-1892). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) to process your petition. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the 

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 11/18/15. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999. 

Sincerely, 

/S/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst
|  | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and |
|--|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of      Registrant. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      August 14, 2009 | /s/ David M. Barnes                              |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                        | David      M. BarnesChief      Executive Officer |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 505 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 505

Expressing the sense of the Congress that there should be established a 
                   National Safety in Numbers Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2002

 Mr. Hoekstra submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that there should be established a 
                   National Safety in Numbers Month.

Whereas first responders around the Nation recognize the importance of easily 
        readable and highly visible address numbers in eliminating extra time 
        spent finding an emergency destination;
Whereas each year needless loss of lives and property occurs because of 
        emergency personnel being slowed down as a result of poorly marked 
        address numbers;
Whereas address numbers should be plainly visible from road traffic lanes in 
        either direction of approach;
Whereas in an emergency a well marked address may be the difference between 
        life-saving emergency response and tragedy; and
Whereas the establishment of a National Safety in Numbers Month for the month of 
        April would help to educate the people of the United States on the 
        importance of ensuring that their street address is clearly marked: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that there should be established a 
National Safety in Numbers Month.
                                 <all>
```
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard Anthony TORRES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 80SA160.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

March 2, 1981.

Robert L. Russel, Dist. Atty., James A. Reed, David H. Zook, Deputy Dist. Attys., Colorado Springs, for plaintiff-appellant.

J. Gregory Walta, Colorado State Public Defender Lynn L. Palma, Thomas M. Van Cleave, III, Deborah S. Waldbaum, Deputy State Public Defenders, Denver, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the district attorney on a disputed question of law relating to a plea bargain. Section 16-12 — 102, C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8). The issue raised by the district attorney is not supported by a factual predicate in the abbreviated record before us which would permit proper appellate review, pursuant to section 16-12-102, C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCPW-10-0000231 

06-JAN-2011 

09:12 AM 

NO. SCPW-10-0000231



IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I


BYRON SAY, Petitioner,



vs.



CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT,


STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent. 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING



(CASE NO. SP 10-1-0024) 
 

ORDER



(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.


and Circuit Judge Garibaldi, assigned by reason of vacancy)



Upon consideration of petitioner Byron Say's petition 

for a writ of mandamus and the papers in support, it appears that 

petitioner's September 28, 2010 "Motion to Compel [the circuit] 

Court to Answer [the May 17, 2010 petition]" was responded to by 

the circuit court, on October 13, 2010, by a memorandum from the 

legal documents branch. Accordingly, petitioner fails to 

demonstrate that the circuit court is not responding to the 

May 17, 2010 petition and that he is entitled to extraordinary 

relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 

338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that 

will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and 
indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to



redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested



action.). Therefore,
 


IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate



court shall process the petition for a writ of mandamus without



payment of the filing fee.



IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of



mandamus is denied.



DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, January 6, 2011. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama 

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. 

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. 

/s/ Colette Y. Garibaldi 

2
THE VISUAL AIDS ON THE FOLLOWING 

PAGES ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND 

NOT INTENDED FOR OFFICIAL USE. 

TO PURCHASE OFFICIAL VISUAL AIDS PLEASE CONTACT

THE SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION’S

EQUIPMENT AND FORMS DEPOT

USDA, AMS, FVP, SCI

831 MITTEN ROAD, ROOM 200

BURLINGAME, CA 94010

PHONE: 650-552-9073

FAX: 650-552-9147

EQUIPMENT CATALOG


Materially

Detracting

(Damage)

USDACUC-CP-2September2017

Cucumbers-OpenSpaces(Quality)

Damageonly:Whenasinglesideofacutismateriallydetractingfrom theappearance

orwhenthetissueismoldyormateriallydiscolored.

NotMaterially

Detracting

(U.S.No.1)

Cutcrosswiseinthemiddle.Scoreasdamageifeithersideofcutismateriallydetracting.

Refertosectionon“CommoditieswithoutDefinedCuttingPlans”

intheGeneralShippingPointandGeneralMarketManuals

forproceduresoncuttingforinternaldefects.
SLIDE 215: SHAPE. BOTH LOWER LIMIT U.S. NO. 2 

SLIDE 216: SHAPE. TOP: LOWER LIMIT U.S. NO. 1. 

CENTER: U.S. NO. 2., UPPER LIMIT. BOTTOM: U.S. NO. 2. 
SLIDE 217: SHAPE. TOP: UPPER LIMIT U.S. NO. 2. 

CENTER U.S. NO. 2, LOWER LIMIT. 

BOTTOM: U.S. NO. 1, LOWER LIMIT 

SLIDE 218: SHAPE. U.S. NO. 2, NEAR LOWER LIMIT 
SLIDE 219: SHAPE. TOP: UPPER LIMIT U.S. NO. 2. 

BOTTOM: CULL 

SLIDE 220: SHAPE. TOP: LOWER LIMIT U.S. FANCY 

CENTER: U.S. NO. 1, UPPER LIMIT. BOTTOM: U.S. NO. 2, 

UPPER LIMIT. 
SLIDE 221: SHAPE. TOP: LOWER LIMIT U.S. NO. 2. 

CENTER: UPPER LIMIT U.S. NO. 2. BOTTOM: U.S. NO. 1. 

SLIDE 222: SHAPE. ALL U.S. NO. 2.
#### Jack WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-80-210.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Aug. 3, 1981.

Charles S. Rogers, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Cleveland County, Norman, for appellant.

*1239Jan Eric Cartwright, Atty. Gen., William Roy Holton, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRETT, Presiding Judge:

Jack Williams appeals from a conviction of Robbery with Firearms, pursuant to Laws 1973, ch. 76, § 1, now 21 O.S.Supp. 1980, § 801, in the District Court of McCur-tain County, Oklahoma. He was sentenced to twenty-five (25) years’ imprisonment.

At trial, the State introduced evidence establishing that, after robbing the bank at gunpoint, the appellant forced a bank teller to leave the store with him in order to insure his own safe escape. Upon exiting the bank, the appellant was ordered to halt, whereupon he fired three shots at the police officer. Based on these facts, the appellant was originally charged with three separate crimes arising from the same transaction: Robbery with Firearms; Kidnapping; and Shooting with Intent to Kill.

Before trial both parties stipulated that the kidnapping and shooting charges would be dismissed if evidence of those offenses were offered at the trial for robbery. At the end of the trial for robbery, the prosecutor moved to have the kidnapping and shooting charges dismissed, according to the stipulation. The judge then dismissed the charges for kidnapping and shooting with intent to kill.

The sole error raised by the appellant is that the trial court wrongly permitted testimony to be introduced which established crimes other than the robbery for which the appellant was being tried. The record reveals that at the very outset of the trial both parties did stipulate that if evidence of other crimes was admitted in an attempt to prove the crime of robbery, the other charges would be dismissed. Further, at the end of the trial, in accordance with the agreement and stipulation of the parties, the trial judge dismissed the charges for kidnapping and shooting with intent to kill. The appellant cannot now disavow the binding effect of the stipulation upon him, absent a showing that he was deprived of some fundamental right. Because such a showing has not been made, the proposition of error is without merit. *McCoy v. State,*536 P.2d 1309 (Okl.Cr.1975); *Webb v. State,*538 P.2d 1054 (Okl.Cr.1975); *Montgomery v. State,*474 P.2d 667 (Okl.Cr.1970).

The judgment and sentence appealed from is affirmed.

BUSSEY and CORNISH, JJ., concur.
HOLLAND & KNIGHT L.L.P. 

800 17TH STREET, N.W., SUITE 11 00 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 

TEL: + 1·202·955·3000 

FAX: + 1·202·955·5564 

September 5, 2013 

Via regulations.gov and email 

Robert Finamore 

Division Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing 

Office of International Aviation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

ZUCKERT, SCOUTT & RASENBERGER, L.L.P. 

888 17TH STREET, N.W., SUITE 700 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 

TEL: + 1·202·298·8660 

FAX: + 1·202·342·0683 

Re: Application ofEtihad Airways P.J.S.C. and Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. 

for a Blanket Statement of Authorization; Docket OST-2013-0166 

Dear Mr. Finamore: 

We have polled the air carrier representatives on the attached service list regarding the 

above-referenced Application and received no objections. Accordingly, we respectfully request 

expedited consideration of this Application. 

Very truly yours, 

Counsel for Etihad Airways P.J.S.C. 

cc: All parties listed on the attached service list 

MaM. 11. ~1/A"'"t- f/i; William H. Callaway, Jr. 'fH'I 

Jonathon H. Foglia 

whcallaway@zsrlaw.com 

jhfoglia@zsrlaw .com 

Counsel for Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I caused a copy of the foregoing letter to be served, this 5th day of 

September, 2013, via email transmission, on the following persons: 

robert. wirick@aa.com 

francis.heil@aa.com 

rpommer@atlasair .com 

sascha. vanderbellen@delta.com 

sametta.c. bamett@delta.com 

charters@evergreenairlines .com 

ran j it.seth@evergreenairlines.com 

chris.schuldt@evergreenhelicopters.com 

philip.church@evergreenhelicopters.com 

robert.foster@evergreenairlines.com 

anbird@fedex.com 

gbleopard@fedex.com 

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com 

peter .beckett@polaraircargo.com 

j onathan.linde@united.com 

steve.morrissey@united.com 

dan. weiss@united.com 

lhalloway@crowell.com (Counsel for United Air Lines) 

gmurphy@crowell.com (Counsel for United Air Lines) 

anita.mosner@hklaw.com (Counsel for United Parcel Service) 

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com (Counsel for United Parcel Service) 

howard kass@usairways.com 

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com 

mlbenge@zsrlaw.com (Counsel for World Airways/North American Airlines) 

robert.finamore@dot.gov 

brett.kruger@dot.gov 

shelita.smith@dot.gov 

john.allen@faa.gov 

urskr@state. gov 

info@airlineinfo.com
# C_2004094EN.01003407.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/34

---

Removal from the register of Case C-305/02 (1)

1

(2004/C 94/87)

By order of 28 January 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case C-305/02: Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

---

(1)  OJ C 247 of 12.10.2002.

1

---