21966 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2012 / Notices 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Revocation in Part, 76 FR 53404 (August 26, 2011) 

(‘‘Initiation’’). 

2See e.g., Chrome-Plated Lug Nuts From the 

People’s Republic of China; Final Results of 

Antidumping Administrative Review, 60 FR 48687 

(September 20, 1995) and Certain Frozen Fish 

Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Final Results and Partial Rescission of the Seventh 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR 

15039 (March 14, 2012). 

3See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 76 FR 38609 

(July 1, 2011). 

4See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Requests for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 53404 

(August 26, 2011) (‘‘Initiation’’). The Initiation 

covered the following companies: (1) Pingdingshan 

Coal Group Kaifeng Xinghua Fine Chemical Plant 

(‘‘Fine Chemical’’); (2) Tianjin Changjie Chemical 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Changjie Chemical’’); (3) Tianjin North 

Food Co., Ltd. (‘‘North Food’’); (4) Hangzhou 

Embaiking Pharmaceutical Corp. Ltd. (‘‘Embaiking 

Pharmaceutical’’); (5) Escalade Ltd./Escalade Israel 

Ltd. (‘‘Escalade’’); (6) The High Trans Corporation 

(‘‘High Trans Corporation’’); (7) The Seicheng 

Chemical Company (aka Sei Cheng) (‘‘Seicheng 

Chemical’’); (8) Yuan Shan Co. Ltd. (‘‘Yuan Shan’’); 

(9) Sin-Ho Trading Co. Ltd. (aka Xin He) (‘‘Sin-Ho 

Trading’’); (10) Long Hwang Chemicals Co. Ltd. (aka 

Lung Huang Trading) (‘‘Long Hwang Chemicals’’); 

(11) Sun Disc Company, Ltd. (‘‘Sun Disc’’); and (12) 

Kingchem. 

5See Memorandum to the File, ‘‘Saccharin from 

the People’s Republic of China: Release of U.S. 

Entry Documents from the Department’s August 25, 

2011 Request—A–570–878,’’ (‘‘Release of Entry 

Data’’) dated October 25, 2011. 

6The Department’s no-shipment inquiry is 

located on the CBP Web site under message number 

1355309, dated December 21, 2011. See http:// 

addcvd.cbp.gov. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this POR. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Administrative Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return/destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

These final results and this notice are 

issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) 

of the Act. 

Dated: April 5, 2012. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix 

Issues in the Decision Memorandum 

Comment 1: Whether the Department’s 

Preliminary Determination to Rescind the 

New Shipper Review Was Correct 

Comment 2: Whether the Department 

Properly Analyzed Heze Huayi’s 

Unreported Sales 

Comment 3: Whether Heze Huayi’s Final 

Antidumping Duty Rate Should Be the 

PRC-entity Rate 

[FR Doc. 2012–8865 Filed 4–11–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–878] 

Saccharin From the People’s Republic 

of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Intent To Rescind in Part 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: April 12, 2012. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is 

conducting an administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on 

saccharin from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’) for the period of review 

(‘‘POR’’) July 1, 2010, through June 30, 

2011, covering 12 manufacturers/ 

exporters of subject merchandise from 

the PRC.1 The Department intends to 

rescind the review with respect to 

Kingchem LLC (‘‘Kingchem’’), for which 

the request for review was timely 

withdrawn. The Department 

preliminarily finds that, because none of 

the companies located in the PRC 

established eligibility for a separate rate, 

they will be treated as part of the PRCwide entity. The Department also finds 

that the third-country exporters, because 

they do not have individual exporter 

rates, will continue to be subject to the 

cash deposit and assessment rates 

applicable to their PRC suppliers, in 

accordance with the Department’s 

longstanding practice.2

We intend to issue the final results no 

later than 120 days from the date of 

publication of this notice, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Stolz, AD/CVD Operations, Office 8, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4474. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 1, 2011, the Department 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on saccharin 

from the PRC for the period July 1, 2010 

through June 30, 2011.3 On July 28, 

2011, the Department received a timely 

request from Kinetic Industries 

(‘‘Kinetic’’), in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), for an administrative review 

of this order. Kinetic submitted a second 

timely request on July 29, 2011, naming 

a twelfth respondent. On August 26, 

2011, in accordance with section 751(a) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(‘‘the Act’’), the Department published 

in the Federal Register the initiation 

notice of this antidumping duty 

administrative review with respect to 

the 12 companies covered by Kinetic’s 

requests for review.4 On October 25, 

2011, the Department placed on the 

record U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (‘‘CBP’’) import data which 

indicates that none of the companies 

named in the Initiation had suspended 

entries of subject merchandise into the 

United States during the POR.5

The Department invited comments 

regarding the CBP data and respondent 

selection but received none. In addition, 

the Department issued a no-shipment 

inquiry to CBP on December 21, 2011, 

covering the companies located in the 

PRC and the third-country exporters 

(except Kingchem).6 The inquiry 

requested CBP to report any evidence of 

shipments during the POR by these 

companies but did not request a 

response if no such evidence exists. The 

Department did not receive a response 

from CBP. 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by this 

antidumping duty order is saccharin. 

Saccharin is defined as a non-nutritive 

sweetener used in beverages and foods, 

personal care products such as 

toothpaste, table top sweeteners, and 

animal feeds. It is also used in 

metalworking fluids. There are four 

primary chemical compositions of 

saccharin: (1) Sodium saccharin 

(American Chemical Society Chemical 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2012 / Notices 21967 

7See Initiation. 

8See id., 76 FR at 53405. 

9See https://iaaccess.trade.gov/help/IA%20

ACCESS%20User%20Guide.pdf. 

10 Id. 

Abstract Service (‘‘CAS’’) Registry 128– 

44–9); (2) calcium saccharin (CAS 

Registry 6485–34–3); (3) acid (or 

insoluble) saccharin (CAS Registry 81– 

07–2); and (4) research grade saccharin. 

Most of the U.S.-produced and imported 

grades of saccharin from the PRC are 

sodium and calcium saccharin, which 

are available in granular, powder, spraydried powder, and liquid forms. The 

merchandise subject to this order is 

currently classifiable under subheading 

2925.11.00 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States 

(‘‘HTSUS’’) and includes all types of 

saccharin imported under this HTSUS 

subheading, including research and 

specialized grades. Although the 

HTSUS subheading is provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

Department’s written description of the 

scope of this order remains dispositive. 

Intent To Rescind the Administrative 

Review in Part 

19 CFR 351.213(d)(1) provides that 

the Department will rescind an 

administrative review if the party that 

requested the review withdraws its 

request for review within 90 days of the 

date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review, or 

withdraws it at a later date if the 

Department determines it is reasonable 

to extend the time limit for withdrawing 

the request. The Department initiated 

this administrative review on August 

26, 2011.7 On August 30, 2011, Kinetic 

timely withdrew its request for review 

covering Kingchem in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). No other party 

requested a review of Kingchem. 

However, Kingchem does not have a 

separate rate but is part of the PRC-wide 

entity which continues to be under 

review. Therefore, the Department 

intends to rescind this review with 

respect to Kingchem at the final results 

of review. 

The PRC-Wide Entity 

Fine Chemical, Changjie Chemical, 

North Food, and Embaiking 

Pharmaceutical, all companies located 

in the PRC, did not submit separate rate 

applications or certifications to 

demonstrate their eligibility for separate 

rate status. As stated in the Initiation, 

‘‘[a]ll firms listed below that wish to 

qualify for separate-rate status in the 

administrative reviews involving NME 

countries must complete, as 

appropriate, either a separate-rate 

application or certification, as described 

below.’’ 8 Because Fine Chemical, 

Changjie Chemical; North Food, and 

Embaiking Pharmaceutical did not 

demonstrate that they were entitled to a 

separate rate, the Department 

preliminarily finds that they should be 

considered part of the PRC-wide entity 

for this review. 

Third-Country Exporters 

CBP data reviewed by the Department 

do not show any reviewable entries of 

subject merchandise made by the thirdcountry exporters Escalade, High Trans 

Corporation, Seicheng Chemical, Yuan 

Shan, Sin-Ho Trading, Long Hwang 

Chemicals, and Sun Disc during the 

POR. There is no information on the 

record of this proceeding indicating that 

the third-country exporters made entries 

of subject merchandise during the POR. 

Because these companies are located 

outside of the PRC, and they do not 

have individual exporter rates, the 

Department preliminarily determines 

that their entries of subject merchandise 

will be assessed at the rate applicable to 

their PRC suppliers. 

Assessment Rates 

If these preliminary results of review 

and intent to rescind are adopted in the 

final results, then antidumping duties 

will be assessed as follows. For all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

by the PRC-wide entity entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption during the POR we intend 

to instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties at the ad valorem PRC-wide 

entity rate of 329.94 percent. For all 

non-PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, we intend to instruct 

CBP to assess the rate applicable to the 

PRC exporter(s) that supplied that nonPRC exporter. The Department intends 

to issue assessment instructions directly 

to CBP 15 days after the publication of 

the final results in the Federal Register. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

If these partial preliminary results are 

adopted in the final results, then the 

following cash deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of the 

final results of this administrative 

review for all shipments of the subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the publication date, as provided 

for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

For previously investigated or reviewed 

PRC and non-PRC exporters that have 

separate rates, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the exporter-specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (2) 

for all PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be the PRCwide entity rate of 329.94 percent; and 

(3) for all non-PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the PRC 

exporter that supplied that non-PRC 

exporter. These requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Since no calculations were performed 

for these partial preliminary results, no 

disclosure is required under 19 CFR 

351.224(b). Any interested party may 

request a hearing within 30 days of 

publication of this notice in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.310(c). Any hearing 

will be held 37 days after the 

publication of this notice, or the first 

business day thereafter unless the 

Department alters the date pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.310(d). Individuals who 

wish to request a hearing must submit 

a written request within 30 days of the 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register to the Assistant Secretary for 

Import Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, pursuant to the 

Department’s e-filing regulations.9

Requests for a public hearing should 

contain: (1) The party’s name, address, 

and telephone number; (2) the number 

of participants; and (3) to the extent 

practicable, an identification of the 

arguments to be raised at the hearing. 

Unless otherwise notified by the 

Department, interested parties may 

submit case briefs within 30 days of the 

date of publication of this notice in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(1)(ii). As part of the case 

brief, parties are encouraged to provide 

a summary of the arguments and a table 

of authorities cited in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.309(c)(2). Rebuttal briefs, 

which must be limited to issues raised 

in the case briefs, must be filed within 

five days after the case brief is filed in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(d). All 

briefs must be filed in accordance with 

the Department’s e-filing regulations.10

Parties should confirm by telephone the 

time, date, and place of the hearing 

within 48 hours before the scheduled 

time. The Department intends to issue 

the final results of this review, which 

will include the results of its analysis of 

issues raised in the briefs, not later than 

120 days after the date of publication of 

this notice in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(1). 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

21968 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2012 / Notices 

1United Steel Corporation requested an 

administrative review on the following companies: 

Anhui Tianda Oil Pipe, Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., 

Ltd., Beijing Sai Lin Ke Hardware Co., Ltd., 

Hengyang Steel Tube Group Int’l Trading Inc., 

Hengyang Valin MPM Tube Co., Ltd., Hengyang 

Valin Steel Tube Co., Ltd., Hunan Valin Iron & Steel 

Group Co., Ltd., Hunan Valin Steel Co., Ltd., Hunan 

Valin Xiangtan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., Jiangsu 

Changbao Steel Tube Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Chengde 

Steel Tube Share Company, Jiangsu Xigang Group 

Co., Ltd., Jiangyin City Changjiang Steel Pipe Co., 

Ltd., LDR Industries, Inc., Pangang Group Chengdu 

Iron & Steel Co., Shandong Luxing Steel Pipe, 

Shandong HuaBao Steel Pipe, Shanghai Tianyang 

Steel Tube, Tianguan Yuantong Pipe Product Co., 

Ltd., Tianjin Pipe (Group) Corporation, Tianjin Pipe 

International Economic & Trading Corp., Tianjin 

Pipe Iron Manufacturing Co., Ltd., TPCO Charging 

Development Co., Ltd., Wuxi Resources Steel 

Making Co., Ltd., Wuxi Seamless Special Pipe Co., 

Ltd., Wuxi Sifang Steel Tube Co., Ltd., Wuxi 

Zhenda Special Steel Tube Manufacturing, Xigang 

Seamless Steel Tube, Xuzhou Global Pipe and 

Fitting Mfg., Yangzhou Chengde Steel Tube Co., 

Ltd., Yangzhou Lontrin Steel Tube Co., Ltd., and 

Yantai Lubao Steel Tube. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

importers of their responsibility under 

19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: April 2, 2012. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2012–8866 Filed 4–11–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–957] 

Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel 

Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Notice of Rescission of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to a request from 

an interested party, United States Steel 

Corporation, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) initiated an 

administrative review of the 

countervailing duty order on seamless 

carbon and alloy steel standard, line, 

and pressure pipe from the People’s 

Republic of China. The period of review 

is November 10, 2010, through 

December 31, 2010. Based on the timely 

withdrawal of the request for review 

submitted by United States Steel 

Corporation, we are now rescinding this 

administrative review. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 12, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patricia Tran or Eric Greynolds, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 3, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1503 or (202) 482– 

6071, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 30, 2011, the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register a notice of initiation of an 

administrative review of the 

countervailing duty order on seamless 

carbon and alloy steel standard, line, 

and pressure pipe from the People’s 

Republic of China covering the period 

November 1, 2010, through December 

31, 2010. See Initiation of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Request for Revocation in 

Part, 76 FR 82268 (December 30, 2011). 

The review covers 32 companies.1

United States Steel Corporation 

requested a review of all of those 

companies. No other party requested a 

review. 

On March 29, 2012, and amended on 

April 3, 2012, United States Steel 

Corporation withdrew its request for an 

administrative review of the 32 

companies. 

Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Department will rescind an 

administrative review if the party that 

requested the review withdraws its 

request for review within 90 days of the 

publication of the notice of initiation of 

the requested review, or withdraws at a 

later date if the Department exercises its 

discretion to extend the time limit for 

withdrawing the request. United States 

Steel Corporation withdrew its request 

within the 90-day deadline. Therefore, 

we are rescinding the review with 

respect to all companies. 

Assessment 

The Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

assess countervailing duties on all 

appropriate entries. Countervailing 

duties shall be assessed at rates equal to 

the cash deposit or bonding rate of 

estimated countervailing duties required 

at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions directly to CBP 15 days 

after publication of this notice. 

Notifications 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return/destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: April 5, 2012. 

Edward C. Yang, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–8841 Filed 4–11–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–357–813] 

Honey From Argentina: Rescission of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 12, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni 

Page, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1398. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 10, 2001, the 

Department of Commerce (Department) 

published in the Federal Register the 

countervailing duty order on honey 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES