alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Larry T. BESSEY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. David A. TUTEN and Dianne Tuten, his wife, Defendants and Appellants.

No. 17318.

Supreme Court of Utah.

April 6, 1981.

Ron Nehring, Salt Lake City, for defendants and appellants.

Edward T. Wells, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a judgment of foreclosure of a real estate second mortgage for failure of the defendants to make payments as agreed to in a promissory note secured by the second mortgage. The judgment is affirmed with no costs awarded.

The defendants were several months in arrears on a superior first mortgage and also on the second mortgage, which latter is the basis for this litigation and the judgment. The note called for costs, expenses and reasonable attorney’s fees, which fees in this case were set, on sworn supporting testimony, at $1,000.

The appellants make much of the fact that the plaintiff, second mortgagee, had paid the delinquencies on the first mortgage (to protect his own personal interest), claiming he should not be allowed attorney’s fees in protecting such interest but in saving the first mortgagee from the expense and necessity to foreclose its mortgage. Such fees would be payable in any event under the second mortgage note in the event foreclosure were pursued, as was the case here. Appellants’ point on appeal as to this aspect of the case appears to be without merit, which is our conclusion here.

The only other point on appeal is that the trial court erred in allowing the plaintiff to accelerate payment of the balance of the note. The right to accelerate under the facts here was consensual, and the court’s giving permission was to do what plaintiff already legally was permitted to do.

STEWART, J., concurs in the result.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration by the Wind-Up Order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, dated July 30, 2010, the United States Small Business Administration hereby revokes the license of AltoTech II, L.P., a California Limited Partnership, to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 09790431 issued to AltoTech II, L.P. on December 04, 2000 and said license is hereby declared null and void as of July 30, 2010.

United States Small Business Administration.

Dated: October 24, 2011.

Sean J. Greene,

Associate Administrator for Investment.

[FR Doc. 2012-882 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of JER Investors
Trust Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Joseph E. Robert, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |        |  |                                                  
|------------------------ |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 10, 2008 |  |        |  | /s/    Joseph E. Robert, Jr.                     
|                         |  | Name:  |  | Joseph E. Robert, Jr.                            
|                         |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June
30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:/s/ James A. CalderJames A. Calder
Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
AMS and the USDA Cattle & Carcass Training Center at 

West Texas A&M University will offer a training on

CME Live Cattle and 

Carcass Acceptance 

Join us on May 17-18, 2023, for this two-day course focused on a wide range of topics related to CME live 

cattle and carcass specifications and deliveries. AMS will provide updates on USDA’s supply chain 

initiatives, including an overview of USDA’s Meat and Poultry Processing Capacity Technical Assistance 

Program.

In addition, attendees may participate in-person or virtually in an onsite USDA Cattle Contract Library 

Pilot Program listening session. For virtual attendees, the meeting will be broadcasted live as a 

webinar. To join from a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone or Android device, please join via Zoom. 

May 17 -18, 2023, at the West Texas A&M University 

Caviness Meat Science and Innovation Center 

Register for the event

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of INverso Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Randall S. Goulding, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:      May
      15, 2009
              /s/
      Randall S. GouldingBy:  Randall
      S. GouldingIts:  Chief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
INverso Corp. and will be retained by INverso Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David M. Engert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc.



|                   |  |  |  |        |  |                                                                    
|------------------ |  |  |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 7, 2010 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/    DAVID M.
ENGERT                                             
|                   |  |  |  | Name:  |  | David M. Engert                                                    
|                   |  |  |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

                                CERTIFICATION OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

This certification is given by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Valley Bancorp ("the Registrant") pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Each of the undersigned hereby certifies,
with respect to the Registrant's quarterly report of Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of
the date hereof (the "Report"), that:

            1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Barry L. Hulin                                            /s/ Dick Holtzclaw
------------------                                            ------------------
Barry L. Hulin                                                    Dick Holtzclaw
Chief Executive Officer     Date: November 8, 2005       Chief Financial Officer
Valley Bancorp                                                    Valley Bancorp
GRAIN INSPECTION SERVICES 

AMA FEE SCHEDULE ADDENDUM

Olivia Wilson, Deputy Director Hosea Fortune, Program Manager 

Division of Commodity Services Grain Inspection Services

102 Governor Street 2503 S. Military Highway

Richmond, VA 23219 Suite C

Phone: (804)-786-2112 Chesapeake, VA 23324-0476

 Phone: (757)-494-2455

 FAX: (757)-494-2456

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 13, 2024 

AUTHORITY: The Agricultural Marketing Act (AMA) of 1946

• Commodity Cooperative Service Agreement Fees. In addition to all other applicable fees, 

commodity cooperative service agreement fees for commodity inspection services (pulses, hops, 

and miscellaneous processed commodities), excluding rice, will be assessed at the current 

percentage rate identified in FGIS Directive 9180.74 (Service Fees and Billing Codes, Attachment 

4.) The assessed fees must exclude travel, mailing expenses, and state and local taxes. Invoices 

will identify assessed commodity cooperative service agreement fees as separate line items.

Phytosanitary Inspection and Weighing of all AMA products

 

Contract Rate per Employee per Hour Non-Contract Rate per Employee per Hour

Regular Time Overtime Holidays Regular Time Overtime & Holidays 

 $37.00 $48.00 $52.00 $55.00 $60.00 

Additional Tests (per individual test plus 1 / 2 hour minimum preparation time)

Falling Number Determination ............................................................. $21.88 

per test

Revised 03/2024
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Calpine Generating Company,
LLC and CalGen Finance Corp.
(collectively, the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
each of the undersigned does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of his knowledge, based upon a review of the Report: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company. /s/ Peter Cartwright
    
    /s/ Robert D. KellyPeter Cartwright
    
    Robert D. KellyChief
Executive Officer and President
Calpine Generating Company, LLC
CalGen Finance Corp.
    
    Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Calpine Generating Company, LLCCalGen Finance Corp.
 Dated: November 16, 2004 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Calpine Generating Company, LLC and will be retained by Calpine
Generating Company, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
# Table 5

# Sheet2

# Sheet3
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 6, 2021

No. 04-19-00318-CV

Leticia R. BENAVIDES,

Appellant

v.

Cristina B. ALEXANDER, as Permanent Guardian of the Person of Carlos Y. Benavides, Jr.; 

Carlos Y. Benavides, III; Rancho Viejo Cattle Company, Ltd.; Benavides Management, LLC; 

and Linda Cristina Alexander and Guillermo Benavides, as Managers of Benavides 

Management, LLC,

Appellees

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CVQ-000161-D1

Honorable Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

The current deadline for appellant’s motion for rehearing is December 2, 2021. On 

December 3, 2021, appellant filed an unopposed motion seeking a four-day extension of that 

deadline. After consideration, we GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER her to file her 

motion for rehearing by December 6, 2021.

It is so ORDERED on December 6, 2021.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED AN GELA FAYE STOLDT , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 21

- 760 LT Case No. 2013

- 101064

- CFDL STATE O F FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed July 5, 2 022 3.850 A ppeal f rom the C ircuit C ourt for Volusi a County , James R. Cl ayton , Judge. Angela S to l dt, O c ala, p ro se. Ashley M oody, A ttorney G eneral, Tallahassee, an d D ouglas T

. S quire, Assis tant A ttorney G eneral, D aytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT , C.J. , WALLIS and NARDELLA , JJ ., conc ur.
AMS Ground Beef Contractor Pathogen Performance - Fiscal Year: 20211/,2/

Contractor Sub-lots Produced (% of Total)

E. coli O157:H73/ Salmonella4/

# Positive % Positive # Positive % Positive

C1 383 (8.0) 0 0 12 3.13

C3 --- --- --- --- ---

C4 2,226 (46.6) 0 0 2 0.09

C5 532 (11.1) 0 0 9 1.69

C9 1,434 (30.0) 0 0 29 2.02

C18 --- --- --- --- ---

C20 --- --- --- --- ---

C23 --- --- --- --- ---

C29 32 (0.7)) 0 0 5 15.63

C37 171 (3.6) 0 0 0 0

Total 4,778 (100.0) 0 0 57 1.19

1/A full description of the ground beef purchase program specification is available at https://www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food/product-specs#Beef. 2/Production Dates: October 1, 2020 to September 30, 2021. 3/E. coli O157:H7 Critical Limit: Positive (+) Result / 325g. 4/Salmonella Critical Limit: Positive (+) Result / 325g.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

      ( print page 21560)    

# TIME AND DATE:

10 a.m., Tuesday, April 17, 2012.

# PLACE:

The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey Avenue NW., Washington, DC

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter                         *Long Branch Energy*                         v.                         *Secretary of Labor,*                         Docket Nos. WEVA 2009-1492-R,                         *et al.*                         (Issues include whether the judge erred in denying motions to dismiss late-filed petitions for assessment of civil penalties.)                    

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Emogene Johnson,

Administrative Assistant.

[FR Doc. 2012-8654 Filed 4-6-12; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8660]



[[Page 21778]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Initial Review

    The meeting announced below concerns Development and Testing of a 
Clinic-Based Intervention to Increase Dual Protection against 
Unintended Pregnancy and STDs among High Risk Female Teens, FOA DP12-
001, initial review.
    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Dates: Time and Date:
    11 a.m.-5 p.m., May 8, 2012 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in 
response to ``Development and Testing of a Clinic-Based Intervention 
to Increase Dual Protection against Unintended Pregnancy and STDs 
among High Risk Female Teens, FOA DP12-001, initial review.''
    Contact Person For More Information: M. Chris Langub, Ph.D., 
Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway NE., Mailstop F-
46, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, Telephone: (770) 488-3585.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: April 1, 2012.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012-8660 Filed 4-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
#### Melvin BELL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ernest D. BOWER, Sheriff of Weld County, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 79SA90.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Feb. 11, 1980.

Melvin Bell, pro se.

J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Hennessey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Edward G. Donovan, Sol. Gen., Lynn Ford, Asst. Atty. Gen., Litigation Section, Denver, for respondent-appellee.

■LEE, Justice.

Appellant Melvin Bell appeals from the dismissal by the district court of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. We affirm the district court.

Appellant was sentenced in federal court in Wyoming for violation of the Mann Act. While confined in the Laramie County Jail in Cheyenne, Wyoming, pending transfer to federal prison, and without the benefit of extradition proceedings, he was removed from the Wyoming jail by U. S. Marshalls and turned over to officers of the Weld County, Colorado, sheriff’s department. He was then brought to Weld County and charged with first-degree sexual assault. After trial, he was convicted of second-degree sexual assault. Appellant petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, contending that his Colorado conviction is invalid because he was unlawfully removed from Wyoming by the Weld County sheriff. We do not agree.

The law on this question is well established:

> “The circumstances by which an accused person comes before a court have no bearing on the court’s power to try him. *Frisbie v. Collins,*342 U.S. 519, 72 S.Ct. 509, 96 L.Ed. 541 (1952). A court which has jurisdiction of the subject matter of the criminal prosecution need not inquire how a defendant was brought before it; his presence in court is sufficient to confer jurisdiction over his person. *Massey v. People,*179 Colo. 167, 498 P.2d 953 (1972); *DeBaca v. Trujillo,*167 Colo. 311, 447 P.2d 533 (1968).” *Brown v. Dist. Ct.,*194 Colo. 225, 571 P.2d 1091 (1977).

The manner by which appellant was brought to Colorado, therefore, has no bearing on the validity of appellant’s conviction, and the district court was correct in dismissing the habeas corpus proceeding.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7023

CHARLES ALONZO TUNSTALL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. FRA NK L. PERRY; BEVERLY STUBBS, R. N.; DR. ARTHUR DAVIS; CLINTON BROCKINGTON; DR. SAMI HUSSAN; JANE WELCH; DR. DONALD MICKLOS; LYNDA PADGETT; LITITIA OWENS; LEQUECIA FALCON; PAULA Y. SMITH; MS. CARMEN S. HENDRICKS; DR. KEYSER; PETER WOGLAM , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Gr eensboro

. Loretta C. Biggs , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv
- 01434

- LCB

- JEP )

Submitted : December 21, 2017 Decided: December 28, 2017

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Charles Alonzo Tunstall , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Charles Alonzo Tunstall appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismiss ing Tunstall’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tunstall v. Perry , No. 1:16

- cv
- 01434

- LCB

- JEP (M.D.N.C. Jul y 25, 2017) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED