p. 1



# OAR Box 1706 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



# Document

Number: 

# Dlll-A- 1
Docket Number: 

# A-98-1 3

Printed 10/8/2008 10:25:07

AM Sheet 1 of 142P. 2 

# A-1S-1 3 5H-A- I



# o f= 1

\ 1 ^
^ - 

# Tuesday ,

Apri l 2 , 200 2



# Par tII

Y 

# r Environmenta l

Protectio n Agenc y 4 0 CF RPar t6 3 Nationa l Einissio n Standard s fo r Hazardou s Ai rPollutants : Organi cLiquid s Distributio n (Non-Gasoline) ; Propose d Rul e

• >P. 3

1567 4 Federa l Register/Vol
. 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y 4 0 CF R Par

t 6 3 [FRL-7163-4] RI N 2060-AH4 1 Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r Hazardou s Ai r Pollutants : Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (Non-Gasoline ) AGENCY : Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y (EPA)
. ACTION : Propose drule
. SUMMARY

: Thi s actio n propose s nationa l emissio n standard s fo r

hazardou s ai r pollutant s (NESHAP ) fo r organi c liquid s distributio n (OLD ) (non-gasoline ) operations , whic har e carrie dou t a t storag e terminals , refineries , crud e oi l pipelin e stations , an dvariou s manufacturin g facilities
. Thes e propose dstandard s woul dimplemen t sectio n 112(d ) ofth e Clea n Ai r Ac t (CAA ) b y requirin g al l OLD operation s a t plan t site s tha t

ar e majo r

source s t o mee t hazardou s ai r

pollutan t

(HAP ) emissio n standard s reflectin g th e applicatio n of

th e maximu machievabl e contro l technolog y (MACT)
. Th e EP A estimate s tha t approximatel y 70,20 0 megagram s pe r

yea r (Mg/yr ) (77,30 0 ton s pe r

yea r (tpy) ) o f HA Par e emitte dfromfacilitie s i n thi s sourc e category
. Althoug halarg e numbe r of organi c HA Par e emitte dnationwid e fro mthes e operations , benzene , ethylbenzene , toluene , viny l chloride , an dxylene s ar e amon g th e mos t prevalent
. Thes e HA Phav e bee n show n t o hav e avariet y o f

carcinogeni c an d noncance r

advers e healt heffects
. Th e EP A estimate s tha t thes e propose dstandard s woul dresul t i nth e reductio n o f

HA Pemission s fro mmajo r source s i n th e OL D sourc e categor y b y 2 8 percent
. Th e emission s reduction s achieve db y thes e propose dstandards , whe n combine dwit hth e emission s reduction s achieve db y othe r simila r standards , woul dprovid e protectio n t o th e publi c an dachiev e aprimar y goa l o f th e CAA
. DATES : Comments. Submi t comment s o n o r befor e Jun e 3 , 2002
. Public Hearing. If

anyon e contact s th e EP A requestin g t o spea k a t apubli c hearin g b y Apri l 22 , 2002 , apubli c hearin g wil l b e hel do nMa y 2 , 2002
. ADDRESSES : Comments. B y U.S
. Posta l Service , sen dcomment s (i n duplicat e i f possible ) to : Ai r

an dRadiatio nDocke t an dInformatio n Cente r (6102) , Attentio n Docke t

Numbe r A-98-13 , U.S
. EPA , 120 0 Pennsylvani aAvenue , NW , Washington , D C 20460
. I n perso n o r b y courier , delive r

comment s (i n duplicat e i f possible ) to : Ai r

an d Radiatio nDocke t

an dInformatio n Cente r (6102) , Attentio n Docke t Numbe r A-98-13 , U.S
. EPA , 40 1 M Street , SW , Washingto n D C 20460
. Th e EP A request s tha t

aseparat e cop y als o b e sen t t o th e contac t

perso n liste dbelo w (se e FO RFURTHE RINFORMATIO

NCONTACT)
. Public Hearing. If

apubli c hearin g i s held , i t wil l b e hel da t

i o a.m . i nth e EPA' s Offic e of

Administratio n Auditorium , Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort hCarolina , o r

a t a n alternat e sit e nearby
. Docket. Docke t

No
. A-98-1 3 contain s supportin g informatio n use di n developin g th e standards
. Th e docke t i s locate da t

di e U.S
. EPA , 40 1 M Street , SW , Washington , D C 20460 , i n Roo m M-1500 , Watersid e Mal l (groun dfloor) , an dma y b e inspecte dfro m8:3 0 a.m . t o 5:3 0 p.m. , Monda y diroug hFriday , excep t for lega l holidays
. FO RFURTHE RINFORMATIO

NCONTACT

: Ms
. Marth aSmith , Wast e an dChemica l Processe s Group , Emissio nStandard s Divisio n(MD-13) , U.S
. EPA , Researc h Triangl e Park , N C 27711 ; phon e (919 ) 541-2421 , e-mai l "smith.martha@epa.gov." SUPPLEMENTAR YINFORMATION : Comments. Comment s an ddat ama y b e submitte db y electroni c mai l (e-mail ) to : a-and-r-docket@epa.gov. Electroni c comment s mus t

b e submitte da s a n ASCI I file t o avoi dth e us e of specia l character s an dencryptio nproblems
. Comment s wil l als o b e accepte do n disk s i n WordPerfect ® Core l 8 fd e format
. Al l comment s an ddat a submitte di nelectroni c formmus t not e th e docke t

number : A-98-13
. N o confidentia l busines s informatio n(CBI) shoul db e submitte db y e-mail
. Electroni c comment s ma y b e filed onlin e a t man y Federa l Depositor y libraries
. Commenter s wishin g t o submi t proprietar y informatio n for consideratio nmus t

clearl y distinguis h suc hinformatio nfro mothe r comment s an dclearl y labe l i t

a s CBI
. Sen d submission s containin g suc h proprietar y informatio n directl y t o di e followin g address , an dno t t o th e publi c docket , t o ensur e dia t

proprietar y informatio ni s no t

inadvertentl y place d i n th e docket : Attention : OAQP S Documen t

Contro l Officer , Attn : Ms
. Marth aSmith , U.S
. EPA , 41 1 W
. Chape l Hil l Street , Roo m740B , Durham , N C 27701
. Th e EP A wil l disclos e informatio nidentifie da s CB I onl y t o th e exten t allowe db y th e procedure s se t fort hi n 4 0 CF

Rpar t 2
. If n o clai mof confidentialit y accompanie s a submissio nwhe ni t

i s receive db y di e EPA , th e informatio n ma y b e mad e availabl e t o di e publi c withou t furthe r notic e t o th e commenter
. Public Hearing. Person s intereste di n presentin g ora l testimon y o r inquirin g a s t o whethe r

ahearin g i s t o b e hel d shoul dcontac t

Ms
. JoLyn nCollin s of th e EP A a t

(919 ) 541-567 1 a t

leas t 2 day s i n advanc e of

di e publi c hearing
. Person s intereste di n attendin g di e publi c hearin g mus t

als o cal l Ms
. Collin s t o verif

y th e time , date , an d locatio n of

di e hearing
. Th e publi c hearin g wil l provid e intereste dpartie s th e opportunit y t o presen t data , views , o r argument s concernin g dies e propose d emissio n standards
. Docket. Th e docke t

i s a n organize d an dcomplet e fd e o f

al l th e informatio n considere db y th e EP A i nth e developmen t

of dii s rulemaking
. Th e docke t i s adynami c fil e becaus e materia l i s adde dtiiroughout di e rulemakin g process . Th e docketin g syste mi s intende dt o allo w member s of th e publi c an dindustrie s involve dt o readil y identif

y an dlocat e document s s o dia t tiiey ca neffectivel y participat e i n th e rulemakin g process . Alon g wit h th e propose dan dpromulgate d standard s an dthei r

preambles , th e content s o f

di e docke t

wil l serv e a s th e recor di nth e cas e o f

judicia l review
. (Se e sectio n307(d)(7)(A ) ofth e CAA. ) Th e regulator y tex t

an dothe r

material s relate dt o tiiis rulemakin g ar e availabl e for revie w i n th e docket , o r copie s ma y b e maile do nreques t

fromth e Ai r Docke t b y callin g (202 ) 260-7548
. A reasonabl e fe e ma y b e charge dfor copyin g docke t

materials
. World Wide Web (WWW). I n additio n t o bein g availabl e i n di e docket , a n electroni c cop y of

thi s propose drul e i s als o availabl e o nth e WW Wthroug hth e Technolog y Transfe r

Networ k

(TTN)
. Th e TT Nprovide s informatio n an d technolog y exchang e i nvariou s area s o f ai r pollutio n control
. Followin g signature , acop y ofth e rul e wil l b e poste do nth e TTN' s polic y an d guidanc e pag e for

newl y propose do r promulgate drules : http://www.epa.gov/ ttn/oarpg. If

mor e informatio nregardin g di e TT Ni s needed , cal l th e TT N HEL P lin e a t (919 ) 541-5384
. Title Change. Fo r

purpose s o f

thi s propose drule , th e titl e ha s bee n change dt o "Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r

Hazardou s Ai r

Pollutants : Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (non

Gasoline) " t o bette r

describ e th e affecte d population
. Th e sourc e categor y lis t an d regulator y agend awil l b e amende dt o reflec t thi s nam e chang e i naseparat e action
. Background

Information. Th e backgroun dinformatio nfor th e propose dstandard s i s no t containe di n aforma l backgroun dinformatio n

!>P. 4



### Federa l Register/Vol
. 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s 1567 5 documen t

(BID)
. Instead , w e hav e prepare dtechnica l memorand acoverin g th e followin g topi c areas :
• Industr y description
. • Mode l OLD plants
. • Industr y baselin e emissions
. • Emissio n contro l options
. • MAC T floo r

determination
. • Environmental , energy , an dcos t impacts
. • Economi c impacts
. Thes e memo s hav e bee n combine dint o atechnica l suppor t

documen t

(TSD) , whic hi s include di n Docke t No
. A-98

- 13
. I n addition , ther e ar e severa l othe r memo s tha t

discus s individua l issues , suc ha s selectio no f th e affecte dorgani c HA Pan dth e minimu mHA Pcutof f definin g th e affecte dorgani c liquids
. Eac hof thes e technica l memo s ha s als o bee n place di nDocke t

No
. A-98-13
. Regulated

Entities. Categorie s an d entitie s potentiall y regulate db y thi s actio ninclude : Categor y Industr y SIC *

282 1 286 5 286 9 291 1 422 6 461 2 516 9 517 1 NAICS *

32521 1 32519 2 32518 8 3241 1 4931 1 4931 9 4861 1 4226 9 4227 1 Example s o f regulate d entitie s

Operation s a t majo rsource s tha t transfe rorgani cliquid s int o o rou t o f th e plan t site , includ
ing : liqui d storag e terminals , crud e oi l pipelin e stations , petroleu m refineries , chemica l man ufacturin g facilities , an d othe rmanufacturin g facilitie s wit h collocate d OL D operations

.

Federa l agenc

yfacilitie s tha t operat e an yof th e type s o f entitie s liste d unde rth e "industry " categor yi n thi s table

. 'Considere d t o b e th e primar yindustria l code s fo rth e plan t site s wit h OL D operations , bu t th e lis t i s no t necessaril yexhaustive

. Thi s tabl e i s no t

intende dt o b e exhaustive , bu t

rathe r provide s aguid e fo r reader s regardin g entitie s likel y t o b e regulate db y thi s action
. T o determin e whethe r you r facilit y woul db e regulate db y thi s action , yo u shoul d examin e th e applicabilit y criteri ai n §63.233 4 ofth e propose drule
. I f yo u hav e an y question s regardin g th e applicabilit y of

thi s propose dactio n t o aparticula r

entity , consul t

th e perso n liste di n th e precedin g FO RFURTHE R INFORMATIO N CONTAC T sectio n o r you r EP A regiona l representativ e a s liste di n § 63.1 3 o f

4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t A (Genera l Provisions)
. Outline. Th e followin g outlin e i s provide dt o assis t

yo u i nreadin g thi s preamble
. I
. Backgroun d A
. How woul dthi s rul e relat e t o other EP A regulator y actions ? B
. Wha t i s th e sourc e o

f authority fo

r developmen t

o f NESHAP ? C
. Wha t criteri aare use di n th e developmen t

o f NESHAP ? D
. Wha t ar e th e potentia l healtheffect s associate dwithHA

Pemitte dfromOL

D operations ? II
. Summar

y o f th e Propose dRule A
. Wha t sourc e categor

y woul db e affected b y th e propose dNESHAP ? B
. Wha t are th e primar

y source s o

f emission s an dwhat

ar e th e emissions ? C
. Wha t woul db e th e affectedsource ? D
. Wha t woul db e th e emissio n limits , operatin g limits , an dother standards ? E
. Wha t woul db e th e testin g an dinitial complianc e requirements ? F
. Wha t woul db e th e continuou s complianc e provisions ? G
. Wha t woul db e th e notification , recordkeeping , an dreportin g requirements ? III
. Rational e fo

r Selectin g th e Propose d Standard s A
. Ho w di dw e selec t

th e sourc e category ? B
. How di dw e selec t

th e propose d pollutant s to b e regulated ? C
. How di dw e selec t

th e propose daffecte

d source ? D
. How di dw e determin e th e basi s an d leve l o f th e propose dstandard s fo r existin g an dne w sources ? E
. How di dw e selec t

th e forma t o f th e propose dstandards ? F
. How di dw e selec t

th e propose dtestin g • an dinitial complianc e requirements ? G
. How di dw e selec t

th e propose d continuou s complianc e requirements ? H
. Ho w di dw e selec t

th e propose d notification , recordkeeping , an d reportin g requirements ? IV
. Summar

y o f Environmental , Energy , an d Economi c Impact s A
. Wha t ar e th e ai r qualit y impacts ? B
. Wha t ar e th e cos t impacts ? C
. Wha t are th e economi c impacts ? D
. Wha t ar e th e nonai r

qualit y health , environmental , an denergy impacts ? V
. Administrativ e Requirement s A
. Executiv e Orde

r 12866 , Regulator

y Plannin g an dRevie

w B
. Executiv e Orde

r 13132 , Federalis m C
. Executiv e Orde

r 13084 , Consultatio n an dCoordinatio nwit

hIndian Triba

l Government s D
. Executiv e Orde

r 13045 , Protectio n o

f Childre n fromEnvironmental Healt h Risks andSafet

y Risks E
. Executiv e Orde

r 13211 , Action s Concernin g Regulation s Tha t Significantly Affec

t Energ y Supply , Distribution , o

r Us e F
. Unfunde dMandate s Refor mAct o f 199 5 G
. Regulator

y Flexibilit

y Act (RFA ) as amende dby th e Small Busines s Regulator y Enforcemen

t Fairnes s Ac

t o f 199 6 (SBREFA) , 5 U.S.C
. 60 1 et seq. H
. Paperwor

k Reductio nAc

t I
. Nationa l Technology Transfe

r an d Advancement

Ac t I
. Backgroun d A. How Would

This Rule Relate to Odier EPA Regulatory Actions? ' Owner s an doperator s o f plan t site s whic hcontai n organi c liquid s distributio n activitie s tha t ar e potentiall y subjec t

t o thes e propose d standard s for

OLD operation s ma y als o b e subjec t

t o othe r NESHA Pbecaus e of othe r activitie s tha t

tak e plac e o n th e sam e plan t

site
. Som e tan k

farm s ar e use dt o stor e an dtransfe r organi c liquid s ont o o r

of f asyntheti c organi c chemica l manufacturin g industr y (SOCMI ) plan t

sit e tha t i s subjec t

t o 4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpart s F , G , an dH— Nationa l Emissio n Standard s for Organi c Hazardou s Ai r

Pollutant s fro m th e Syntheti c Organi c Chemica l Manufacturin g Industr y (commonl y referre dt o a s th e hazardou s organi c NESHAP , o r

"HON")
. Distributio n of crud e oi l o r

othe r organi c liquid s a t

a petroleu mrefiner y subjec t t o 4 0 CFR par t 63 , subpar t

CC—Nationa l Emissio n Standard s for

Hazardou s Ai r

Pollutant s fromPetroleu mRefinerie s (th e Refiner y NESHAP) , ma y als o com e unde r OL D NESHA Pcoverage . Finally , bul k gasolin e terminal s subjec t t o 4 0 CF R par t 63 , subpar t

R—Nationa l Emissio n Standard s for

Gasolin e Distributio n Facilitie s (Bul k

Gasolin e Terminal s an d Pipelin e Breakou t

Stations ) ma y distribut e non-gasolin e organi c liquid s throug hdedicate dequipmen t whic h woul dfal l unde r

tiiese propose dOLD standards
. A t

plan t site s subjec t

t o bod i th e propose dOLD standard s an d anothe r NESHAP , th e OLD NESHAP , whe nfinalized , woul dappl y onl y t o th e specifi c equipmen t

an dactivitie s tiiat ar e relate ddirectl y t o th e distributio nof


# 3P. 5



### 1567 6 Federa l Register/Vol . 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s affecte dnon-gasolin e organi c liquid s (whic hinclude s liquid s move deithe r ont o o r of f th e site)
. Som e existin g NESHA Pma y alread y regulate , an dsom e NESHA Punde r developmen t

ma y inten dt o regulate , equipmen t

use dt o distribut e organi c liquid s (e.g. , certai n storag e tank s o r transfe r rack s a t chemica l productio n facilitie s subjec t

t o th e HON)
. T o avoi d overla p o f

requirement s i n tiiese cases , th e OLD NESHA Pwoul dno t appl y t o an y OLD emissio n sourc e alread y complyin g wit hcontro l provision s unde r anothe r par t 6 3 NESHAP
. Fo r othe r applicabl e NESHA Ptha t ar e no t ye t fina l an dwhic hpotentiall y woul d appl y t o OLD equipment , di e NESHA P tha t hav e th e earlies t

complianc e dat e woul dapply
. On e NESHAP , 4 0 CFR par t 63 , subpar t

FFFF , th e Miscellaneou s Organi c Chemica l Productio n an dProcesse s NESHA P (MON) , i s bein g develope dconcurrentl y wit hth e OLD NESHAP , an dpotentiall y wil l regulat e certai n organi c liqui d distributio n source s (i.e. , storag e tanks , transfe r racks , an dequipmen t

leaks ) locate da t

MO N facilit y plan t

sites
. Fo r al l suc hdistributio n source s a t MON facilities , th e OL D NESHA Pwoul ddefe r t o th e MO N an dwoul dno t appl y t o an y o f thos e sources . Th e Pollutio n Preventio n Ac t o f 199 0 (4 2 U.S.C
. 1310 1 et

seq., Publi c La w 101-508 , Novembe r

5 , 1990 ) establishe s th e nationa l polic y ofth e Unite dState s for pollutio n prevention
. Thi s Ac t declare s that : (1 ) Pollutio n shoul db e prevente do r

reduce dwheneve r

feasible ; (2 ) pollutio n tha t

canno t b e prevente do r reduce dshoul db e recycle do r reuse di n a n environmentally-safe manne r whereve r feasible ; (3 ) pollutio n tha t canno t b e recycle do r

reuse dshoul db e treated ; an d(4 ) disposa l o r releas e int o th e atmospher e shoul db e chose n onl y a s alas t resort
. Th e OLD operation s covere db y thes e propose dstandard s distribut e organi c liquid s tha t

ar e ofte n manufacture dan d consume db y othe r

parties
. Thus , tw o o f th e mos t commo n approache s for preventin g pollutio n (produc t reformulatio n o r

substitutin g les s pollutin g products ) ar e no t availabl e t o thes e facilities
. Similarly , thes e facilitie s canno t us e recyclin g o r

reus e a s awa y of limitin g th e amoun t

of thes e liquid s tha t the y handle
. However , th e propose dequipmen t

an dwor k

practic e standard s woul dpreven t pollutio n from tw o of th e principa l emissio n source s i n OLD operations
. Fo r

storag e tanks , w e expec t floatin g roof s t o b e use da s a commo n alternativ e t o add-o n contro l technologies
. Fo r

leak s fromequipmen t suc ha s pump s o r

valves , th e require d lea k detectio n an drepai r

progra mals o woul dpreven t pollutio n a t

th e sourc e withou t th e nee dfor

add-o n contro l equipment
. Th e EP A i s considerin g whethe r ther e ar e an y pollutio n preventio nmeasure s tha t coul db e specifie da s alternative s t o th e contro l approache s i nth e propose dstandards
. W e ar e specificall y requestin g comment s fromth e publi c o n way s tha t additiona l pollutio n preventio n measure s coul db e applie da t OLD operation s facilities
. B. What Is the Source of

Authority for Development

of NESHAP? Sectio n 11 2 o f

th e CA A require s u s t o lis t categorie s an dsubcategorie s o f majo r source s an dare asource s o f HAP , an dt o establis hNESHA Pfor th e liste d sourc e categorie s an dsubcategories
. Th e categor y o f

majo r source s covere db y today' s propose dNESHA Pwa s o nou r initia l lis t

o f HA Pemissio nsourc e categorie s a s publishe di n th e Federa l Registe ro n Jul y 16,199 2 (5 7 FR31576)
. Majo r source s o f

HA Par e thos e tha t hav e th e potentia l t o emi t 1 0 tons/y r

o r mor e o f an y on e HA Po r

2 5 tons/y r

o r mor e o f an y combinatio n o f

HAP
. C. What Criteria Are Used

in the Development

of NESHAP? Sectio n11 2 o f

th e CA A require s tha t w e establis hNESHA Pfor th e contro l of HA Pfrombot hne w an dexistin g majo r sources . Th e CA A require s th e NESHA P t o reflec t th e maximu mdegre e o f reductio n i n emission s of HA Ptha t

i s achievable
. Thi s leve l of contro l i s commonl y referre dt o a s th e maximu m achievabl e contro l technolog y (MACT)
. Th e MAC T floo r

i s th e minimu m contro l leve l allowe dfor NESHA Pan d i s define dunde r

sectio n112(d)(3 ) ofth e CAA
. I n essence , th e MAC T floor ensure s tha t

th e standar di s se t

a t aleve l tha t assure s tha t

al l majo r

source s achiev e th e leve l of

contro l a t

leas t a s stringen t a s tha t alread y achieve db y th e better-controlle dan dlower-emittin g source s i n eac hsourc e categor y o r subcategory
. Fo r

ne w sources , th e MAC T floor

canno t b e les s stringen t tha n th e emissio n contro l tha t i s achieve di n practic e b y th e best

controlle dsimila r

source . Th e MAC T standard s for

existin g source s ca nb e les s stringen t

tha n standard s for

ne w sources , bu t

the y canno t

b e les s stringen t tha nth e averag e emissio n limitatio nachieve db y th e best

performin g 1 2 percen t

o f existin g source s i n th e categor y o r subcategor y (o r th e best-performin g 5 source s for categorie s o r

subcategorie s wit hfewe r tha n 3 0 sources)
. I n developin g MACT , w e als o conside r contro l option s tiiat

ar e mor e stringen t tha nth e floor
. W e ma y establis hstandard s mor e stringen t tha n th e floo r base do nconsideratio no f th e cos t o f achievin g th e emission s reductions , an y healt han d environmenta l impacts , an denerg y requirements
. D. What Are the Potential

Health Effects Associated

With HAPEmitted

From OLD Operations? Th e typ e o f

advers e healt heffect s associate dwit hHA Pemitte db y thi s sourc e categor y ca n rang e frommil dt o severe . Th e exten t

an ddegre e t o whic h healt heffect s ma y b e experience di s dependen t

upon : (1 ) Th e ambien t concentration s observe di n th e area ; (2 ) duratio n an dfrequency o f exposures ; an d(3 ) characteristic s o f expose d individual s ( e.g. , genetics , age , preexistin g healt hconditions , an d lifestyle ) whic hvar y greatl y withi n th e population
. Som e o f

tiiese factor s ar e als o influence db y source-specifi c characteristic s (e.g. , emissio n rates , releas e heights , an dloca l weathe r conditions ) a s wel l a s pollutant-specifi c characteristic s suc ha s toxicity
. Th e followin g i s asummar y o f th e potentia l healt heffect s associate dwit hexposur e t o som e o f

th e primar y HA Pemitte d fromOLD operations
. Benzene. Acut e (short-term ) inhalatio nexposur e o f

human s t o benzen e ma y caus e drowsiness , dizziness , an dheadaches , a s wel l a s eye , skin , an drespirator y trac t irritation , and , a t hig hlevels , unconsciousness
. Chroni c (long-term ) inhalatio n exposur e ha s cause dvariou s disorder s i n th e blood , includin g reduce dnumber s o f re dbloo dcell s an daplasti c anemia , i n occupationa l settings
. Reproductiv e effect s hav e bee n reporte dfo r wome n expose db y inhalatio nt o hig hlevels , an dadvers e effect s o n th e developin g fetu s hav e bee nobserve di nanima l tests
. Increase dincidenc e o f leukemi a (cance r of th e tissue s tha t

for mwhit e bloo dcells ) ha s bee n observe di n human s occupationall y expose dt o benzene
. Th e EP A ha s classifie d benzen e a s aGrou p A , know n huma n carcinogen
. Ethylbenzene. Acut e exposur e t o ethylbenzen e i nhuman s result s i n respirator y effect s suc ha s throa t irritatio n an dches t

constriction , irritatio n ofth e eyes , an dneurologica l effect s suc ha s dizziness
. Chroni c exposur e t o ethylbenzen e b y inhalatio n i nhuman s ha s show n conflictin g result s regardin g it s effect s o n th e blood
. Anima l studie s hav e reporte deffect s o n th e blood , liver , an dkidney s from chroni c inhalatio n exposures . N o informatio n i s availabl e o nth e developmenta l o r

reproductiv e effect s o f ethylbenzen e i nhumans , bu t anima l 

# *iP. 6

Federa l Register/Vol . 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s 1567 7 studie s hav e reporte ddevelopmenta l effects , includin g biit hdefect s i n animal s expose dvi ainhalation
. Th e EP A ha s classifie dethylbenzen e i n Grou p D , no t

classifiabl e a s t o huma n carcinogenicity
. Toluene. Human s expose dt o toluen e fo r shor t period s ma y experienc e irregula r heartbea t

an deffect s o nth e centra l nervou s syste m(CNS ) suc ha s fatigue , sleepiness , headaches , an d nausea . Repeate dexposur e t o hig h concentration s ma y induc e los s of coordination , tremors , decrease dbrai n size , an dinvoluntar y ey e movements , an dma y impai r

speech , hearing , an d vision
. Chroni c exposur e t o toluen e i n human s ha s als o bee n indicate dt o irritat e th e skin , eyes , an drespirator y tract , an dt o caus e dizziness , headaches , an ddifficult y wit hsleep
. Childre n expose dt o toluen e befor e birt hma y suffe r CN S dysfunction , attentio n deficits , an dmino r

fac e an dlim b defects
. Inhalatio n o f

toluen e b y pregnan t wome n ma y increas e th e ris k o f spontaneou s abortion
. Th e EP A ha s develope dareferenc e concentratio n of 0. 4 milligram s pe r

cubi c meter s (mg/m 3 ) for toluene
. Inhalatio n o f

thi s concentratio n o r

les s ove r

alifetim e woul db e unlikel y t o resul t i n advers e noncance r

effects
. N o dat aexis t

tha t sugges t toluen e i s carcinogenic
. Th e EP A ha s classifie dtoluen e i n Grou p D , no t classifiabl e a s t o huma n carcinogenicity
. Vinyl chloride. Acut e exposur e t o hig hlevel s o f

viny l chlorid e i n ai r

ha s resulte di n CN S effect s suc ha s dizziness , drowsiness , an dheadache s i n humans
. Chroni c exposur e t o viny l chlorid e throug hinhalatio n an dora l exposur e i n human s ha s resulte di n live r damage
. Huma n an danima l studie s sho w advers e effect s whic hrais e aconcer n abou t

potentia l reproductiv e an ddevelopmenta l hazard s t o human s fromexposur e t o viny l chloride
. Cance r i s amajo r

concer n fromexposur e t o viny l chlorid e vi ainhalation , a s viny l chlorid e exposur e ha s bee n show n t o increas e th e ris k

o f arar e formo f

live r cance r i n humans
. Th e EP A ha s classifie dviny l chlorid e a s aGrou p A , know n huma n carcinogen
. Xylenes. Short-ter minhalatio no f mixe dxylene s ( amixtur e of thre e closel y relate dcompounds ) i n human s ma y caus e irritatio n of

th e nos e an d throat , nausea , vomiting , gastri c irritation , mil dtransien t ey e irritation , an dneurologica l effects
. Long-ter m inhalatio n of

xylene s i n human s ma y resul t i n CN S effect s suc ha s headaches , dizziness , fatigue , tremors , an d incoordination
. Othe r

reporte deffect s includ e labore dbreathing , hear t palpitation , sever e ches t pain , abnorma l electrocardiograms , an dpossibl e effect s

o nth e bloo dan dkidneys
. Developmenta l effect s hav e bee n indicate dfromxylen e exposur e vi a inhalatio ni nanimals
. No t enoug h informatio nexist s t o determin e th e carcinogeni c potentia l o f mixe dxylenes
. Th e EP A ha s classifie dxylene s i n Grou p D , no t classifiabl e a s t o huma n carcinogenicity
. Implementatio nofth e OL D NESHA P woul dreduc e nationwid e organi c HA P emission s significantl y fromcurren t levels
. Thus , th e propose dstandard s hav e th e potentia l for

providin g bot h cance r an dnoncance r

relate dhealt h benefits
. B y requirin g facilitie s t o reduc e organi c HA Pemitte dfromOLD operations , th e propose dstandard s woul dals o reduc e emission s o f volatil e organi c compound s (VOC)
. Man y VO C reac t photochemicall y wit hnitroge n oxide s i nth e atmospher e t o form tropospheri c (low-level ) ozone . A numbe r of factor s affec t

th e degre e t o whic hVO C emissio nreduction s wil l reduc e ambien t

ozon e concentrations
. Huma n laborator y an dcommunit y studie s hav e show n tha t exposur e t o ozon e level s tha t

excee dth e nationa l ambien t ai r qualit y standard s (NAAQS ) ca n resul t

i n variou s advers e healt h impact s suc ha s alteration s i n lun g capacit y an daggravatio n of existin g respirator y disease
. Anima l studie s hav e show n increase dsusceptibilit y t o respirator y infectio nan dlun g structur e changes
. Th e VO C emission s reduction s resultin g fromthes e propose dNESHA P wil l reduc e low-leve l ozon e an dhav e a positiv e impac t

towar dminimizin g thes e healt heffects
. Amon g th e welfar e impact s from exposur e t o ai r

tha t exceed s th e ozon e NAAQ S ar e damag e t o som e type s of commercia l timbe r

an deconomi c losse s for commerciall y valuabl e crop s suc ha s soybean s an dcotton
. Studie s hav e show n tha t

exposur e t o excessiv e ozon e ca n disrup t

carbohydrat e productio n an ddistributio n i nplants
. Thi s ca nlea d i n tur n t o reduce droo t

growth , reduce d biomas s o r

yield , reduce dplan t

vigo r (whic hca n caus e increase d susceptibilit y t o attac k

frominsect s an d diseas e an ddamag e fromcold) , an d diminishe dabilit y t o successfull y compet e wit hmor e toleran t species
. I n addition , excessiv e ozon e level s ma y disrup t th e structur e an dfunctio no f foreste decosystems
. II . Summar y ofth e Propose d Rul e A. What Source Category Would Be Affected by the Proposed

NESHAP? Th e propose dNESHA Pwoul daffec t organi c liquid s distributio nactivitie s which , take ntogether , ar e considere dt o b e afacility , o r

OLD operations
. Th e regulate dliquid s consis t o f organi c liquid s tha t

contai n 5 percen t

b y weigh t o r mor e o f th e organi c HA Pcompound s i n Tabl e 1 of

th e propose dsubpar t EEEE , an dal l crud e oi l excep t blac k oil
. Th e activitie s i nthi s categor y occu r eithe r a t individua l distributio n facilitie s o r

o nmanufacturin g plan t site s tha t consum e o r

produc e th e organi c liquid s regulate db y th e propose d standards
. Onl y thos e OLD operation s a t majo r sourc e facilitie s o r

plan t site s woul db e regulated
. B. What Are the Primary Sources of Emissions and

What Are the Emissions? Th e emissio n o f

organi c HA Pvapor s result s fromstorin g an dtransferrin g HAP-containin g liquids
. Fixed-roo f tank s underg o losse s du e t o atmospheri c change s an dchange s i ntli e liqui dleve l i n th e tank
. Floatin g roo f tank s experienc e standin g storag e an dliqui d withdrawa l losse s an dals o losse s from fitting s o nth e floating deck
. A s organi c liquid s ar e loade dint o carg o tank s (tan k

truck s an drailcars ) at transfe r racks , vapor s ar e emitte dt o di e atmospher e a s th e risin g liqui d displace s vapor s forme dabov e th e liquid
. T o contro l thes e vapo r emissions , th e parke dcarg o tan k ma y b e connecte dt o aclose dven t vapo r collectio n syste man dcontro l device
. Eve ni nthes e controlle dtransfe r systems , vapor s ma y lea k t o tli e atmospher e fromhatc hcovers , relie f valves , o r

othe r part s o f tiie system
. Th e equipmen t

component s use dt o conve y organi c liquid s betwee n tank s o r pipeline s ca n als o b e asourc e o f vapo r leakage
. A t

OLD operations , tli e equipmen t

o f concer nar e pumps , valves , an dsamplin g connectio n systems
. Th e volatil e constituent s o f organi c liquids , man y o f

whic har e HAP , escap e i n th e vapor s emitte dfromthes e sources . Ou r

199 8 surve y ofth e OLD industr y indicate s tha t

essentiall y al l o

f th e organi c HA Pliste di n th e CA A ar e presen t i nth e liquid s distribute di n thes e operations
. Base do n tha t surve y an dothe r

information , w e hav e estimate dth e tota l curren t HA P emission s fromOL

D operation s t o b e 70,20 0 Mg/y r

(77,30 0 tons/yr)
. C. What Would Be the Affected

Source? Th e affecte dsourc e woul db e tiie combinatio no f

al l regulate dOLD activitie s an dequipmen t a t asingl e OLD operation
. Th e followin g regulate d activitie s ar e typicall y performe dwithi n OL D operation s an dar e par t o f th e affecte dsource :



# J>P. 7



### 1567 8 Federa l Register/Vol
. 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s

• Transfe r

o f organi c liquid s into , an d storag e in , fixed-roof

o r floatin g roo f storag e tanks ; • Transfe r

o f organi c liquid s int o carg o tank s (tan k

truck s o r

railcars ) a t transfe r racks ; an d
• Transfe r

o f organi c liquid s throug h pumps , piping , valves , an dothe r equipmen t

tha t ma y potentiall y leak
. Onl y thos e OLD operation s facilitie s wit ha n organi c liquid s throughpu t greate r tha n 27. 6 millio n liter s (7.2 9 millio n gallons ) pe r

yea r (eithe r int o o r ou t ofth e facility ) woul db e subjec t t o th e propose dstandards
. Also , onl y thos e transfe r

rac k loadin g position s wit ha n organi c liquid s throughpu t o f 11. 8 millio n liter s (3.1 2 millio n gallons ) pe r yea r o r greate r woul db e require dt o instal l th e specifie demissio n control s o n thos e activities
. D. What Would Be the Emission Limits, Operating Limits, and

Other Standards? Th e propose dNESHA Phav e variou s format s fo r

th e differen t

activitie s an d equipmen t

bein g regulated
. Fo r

affecte d storag e tanks , yo u woul dhav e tw o option s fo r

control
. First , yo u coul d instal l aclose dven t

syste man dcontro l devic e wit ha t

leas t a9 5 percen t

contro l efficienc y for

organi c HA Po r

tota l organi c compound s (TOC)
. A s a n option , combustio n device s ma y mee t a n exhaus t

concentratio n limi t

o f 2 0 part s pe r millio n b y volum e (ppmv ) of organi c HA Po r

TOC
. A n operatin g paramete r

o f th e contro l devic e woul d hav e t o b e continuousl y monitore dan d maintaine dwithi n th e establishe d operatin g limits
. Second , yo u coul d mee t awor k practic e standar db y installin g aproperl y constructe d floatin g roo f

i n th e affecte dtank
. Th e tan k siz e an dvapo r

pressur e cutoffs definin g affecte dtank s woul db e differen t fo r existin g an dne w tanks
. Fo r affecte dorgani c liquid s transfe r racks , yo u woul dhav e t o instal l avapo r collectio n syste man dacontro l devic e tha t achieve s 9 5 percen t

contro l efficienc y o r

2 0 ppm v exhaus t concentratio n for

combustio n devices , an dyo u woul dhav e t o continuousl y monito r th e device
. A wor k

practic e standar dwoul dappl y t o carg o tank s loadin g a t

thes e controlle dracks
. Eac h tan k equippe dwit hvapo r

collectio n equipmen t

woul dhav e t o b e teste d annuall y for

vapo r tightnes s usin g EP A Metho d27
. Carg o tank s no t equippe d wit hvapo r

collectio n equipmen t

woul d hav e t o b e teste dusin g th e Departmen t o f Transportatio n (DOT ) standar dtes t procedure s a t

DOT' s require dfrequency. Fo r carg o tank s tha t

yo u d o no t

own , yo u woul dhav e t o ensur e tha t eac htan k loadin g a t

affecte dloadin g position s i s certifie dfo r

vapo r tightness
. Thes e propose dstandard s woul db e th e sam e for existin g o r

ne w transfe r

racks
. A wor k practic e standar dwoul dals o appl y t o equipmen t

(pumps , valves , an d samplin g connectio nsystems ) tha t i s i n organi c liquid s servic e for a t leas t 30 0 hour s pe r

year . Thi s formof

contro l involve s regula r

instrumen t

monitorin g for leaks , an drepai r

o f leakin g equipment
. Owner s an doperator s woul dhav e th e optio n o f applyin g th e provision s of

eithe r subpar t T T o r U U of 4 0 CF Rpar t 63
. Thi s lea k

detectio n an d repai r (LDAR) standar di s bein g propose dfor

bot hexistin g an dne w equipment
. E. What Would Be the Testing and Initial Compliance Requirements? Affecte dOLD operation s woul dnee d t o determin e whic hof

thei r distribute d liquid s qualif

y a s a norgani c liqui da s define di nth e propose dstandards
. Th e specifie dtes t

metho dfor

thi s i s EPA Metho d1 8 i n4 0 CF

Rpar t 60 , appendi x A , an dyo u woul dhav e th e optio n o f suggestin g alternativ e approache s for th e Administrator' s approval
. Contro l device s use dfor storag e tank s o r transfe r rack s woul db e subjec t t o performanc e testin g usin g EP A Metho d 18 , 25 , o r 25 A of 4 0 CFRpar t

60 , appendi x A , o r

Metho d31 6 o f

4 0 CF R par t 63 , appendi x A , dependin g o nth e constituent s of

th e ga s strea mbein g controlle dan dth e forma t o f th e standar d(organi c HA Po r TOC ) th e facilit y select s for

it s complianc e demonstration
. Floatin g roo f tank s woul db e subjec t

t o visua l an dsea l ga p inspection s t o determin e initia l complianc e wit hth e tan k wor k practic e standards
. Th e EP A Metho d2 1 o f 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , appendi x A , i s specifie d for th e equipmen t

LDA Rprogram. y Al l carg o tank s equippe dwit hvapo r collectio nequipmen t

tha t ar e use dt o distribut e organi c liquid s fromaffecte d transfe r rac k loadin g position s woul d hav e t o b e teste dannuall y for vapo r tightnes s usin g EP A Metho d2 7 of 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , appendi x A
. Fo r

carg o tank s tha t

ar e no t s o equipped , th e curren t approve dDO T method s woul d continu e t o b e used
. Initia l complianc e wit hth e emissio n limit s for storag e tank s an dtransfe r rack s woul dconsis t

of demonstratin g tha t th e contro l devic e achieve s 9 5 percen t contro l efficienc y for

organi c HA Po r TOC , o r 2 0 ppm v exhaus t concentratio nfor

combustio ndevices
. Not e tha t al l organi c HA Par e considere di n thi s emissio n limit , no t jus t th e HA Pliste di n Tabl e 1 o f thi s propose dsubpart
. Durin g th e sam e initia l performanc e tes t

(o r durin g a desig n evaluatio n ofth e device) , yo u woul destablis hth e referenc e valu e o r rang e for th e appropriat e operatin g paramete r

o f th e contro l device
. Wor k practic e standard s ar e bein g propose dfo r

storag e tanks , transfe r racks , an dequipment
. Fo r floatin g roo f storag e tanks , yo u woul dhav e t o visuall y inspec t

eac hinterna l floatin g roo f tan k befor e th e initia l filling
. Fo r externa l floatin g roo f

tanks , yo u mus t perfor masea l ga p inspectio n o f th e primar y an dsecondar y dec k seal s witiii n 9 0 day s afte r

filling
. Fo r affecte dtransfe r

rac k loadin g positions , yo u woul dhav e t o maintai n documentatio n showin g tha t carg o tank s tha t wil l loa da t

thos e position s ar e certifie da s vapor-tight
. If yo u implemen t

a n LDARprogra m for you r OLD equipment , yo u woul d hav e t o provid e u s wit hwritte n specification s o f

th e progra ma s par t

of

. you r initia l complianc e demonstration
. F. What Would Be the Continuous Compliance Provisions? T o demonstrat e continuou s complianc e wit hth e emissio n limitatio n for contro l device s controllin g storag e tank s o r transfe r racks , yo u woul dhav e t o continuousl y monito r th e appropriat e operatin g paramete r

an dkee p arecor d ofth e monitorin g data
. Complianc e woul db e demonstrate db y maintainin g th e paramete r

valu e withi nth e limit s establishe ddurin g th e initia l complianc e demonstration
. Ther e ar e differen t

propose dmean s o f demonstratin g continuou s complianc e wit hth e wor k

practic e standards , dependin g o nth e emissio n source . Fo r floating roo f

storag e tanks , yo u woul d hav e t o visuall y inspec t th e tank s o n a periodi c basi s an dkee p record s o f th e inspections
. Fo r

externa l floating roo f tanks , sea l ga p measurement s mus t b e performe do n th e secondar y sea l onc e pe r yea r an do nth e primar y sea l ever y 5 years . An y condition s causin g inspectio nfailure s woul dnee dt o b e repaire dan drecord s o f th e repair s kept
. Th e owne r

o r operato r woul dnee dt o perfor mvapo r

tightnes s testin g o n carg o tank s an dkee p vapo r

tightnes s record s of al l carg o tank s loadin g a t regulate d rac k loadin g positions , an dals o woul d hav e t o tak e step s t o ensur e tha t onl y carg o tank s wit hvapo r

tightnes s certificatio n ar e loade da t tiiese positions
. Example s o f

thes e step s ar e contactin g carg o tan k

owner s t o explai n th e vapo r

tightnes s requirement s an d postin g reminde r

sign s summarizin g th e requirement s a t

th e affecte dloadin g positions
. 

# (rP. 8

Federa l Register/Vol . 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s 

### 15679 G. What Would Be the Notification, Recordkeeping, and

Reporting Requirements? Th e propose dOLD NESHA Pwoul d requir e yo u t o kee p record s an dfil e report s consisten t

wit hth e notification , recordkeeping , an dreportin g requirement s of

th e Genera l Provision s o f 4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t

A
. Tw o basi c type s o f report s woul db e required : initia l notificatio n an dsemiannua l complianc e reports
. Th e initia l notificatio n repor t

woul dappris e th e regulator y authorit y o f

applicabilit y for existin g source s o r

o f constructio nfor ne w sources . Th e initia l complianc e repor t woul d demonstrat e tha t

complianc e ha dbee n achieved
. Thi s repor t

woul dcontai n th e result s o f th e initia l performanc e test , whic hinclud e th e determinatio n o f th e referenc e operatin g paramete r valu e o r rang e an dalis t

ofth e organi c liquid s an dequipmen t

subjec t t o th e standards
. Subsequen t

complianc e report s woul d describ e an y deviation s o f monitore d parameter s fromreferenc e values ; failure s t o compl y wit hth e startup , shutdown , an dmalfunctio n pla n (SSMP ) for

contro l devices ; an dresult s of LDARmonitorin g an dstorag e tan k inspections
. Thes e report s ar e als o use d t o notif y th e regulator y authorit y of an y change s i n th e organi c liquid s handle d o r change s i n th e OLD equipmen t o r operations
. Record s require dunde r th e propose d standard s woul dhav e t o b e kep t for 5 years , wit ha t

leas t 2 o f thes e year s bein g o n th e facilit y premises
. Thes e record s woul dinclud e copie s o f al l report s tha t yo u hav e submitted ; a n up-to-dat e recor do f you r organi c liquid s an d affecte dequipment ; an dalistin g o f al l carg o tank s tha t

transfe r organi c liquid s a t affecte drac k

loadin g positions , includin g thei r

vapo r tightnes s certification
. Monitorin g dat afrom contro l device s woul dhav e t o b e kep t t o ensur e tha t

operatin g limit s ar e bein g maintained
. Record s fromth e LDAR progra man dstorag e vesse l inspections , an drecord s o f

startups , shutdowns , an d malfunction s o f

eac hcontro l devic e ar e neede dt o ensur e tha t

th e control s i n plac e ar e continuin g t o b e effective
. III . Rational e fo rSelectin g th e Propose d Standard s A. How Did

We Select

the Source Category? Organi c liquid s distributio n operation s wer e include da s asourc e categor y o n ou r

initia l lis t

o f HA P sourc e categories
. Sinc e liqui d distributio n i s ofte n carrie dou t a t SOCMI , refinery , o r

otiie r manufacturin g plan t sites , ther e i s th e potentia l for overlappin g contro l requirement s i n thos e case s wher e OLD activitie s ar e alread y regulate db y othe r NESHAP
. T o avoi dth e situatio n wher e a nemissio n sourc e coul db e subjec t

t o multipl e NESHAP , w e ar e definin g th e OL D sourc e categor y t o exclud e emissio n source s alread y covere db y othe r NESHA Pfromcontro l unde r thes e propose dstandards
. Th e propose dOrgani c Liquid s Distributio n(non-Gasoline ) NESHA P woul dappl y t o organi c liquid s distributio nactivitie s a t site s tha t

ar e determine dt o b e "majo r sources " a s define di n sectio n 112(a)(1 ) ofth e CAA
. Thi s mean s thos e plant s o r facilitie s wher e th e stationar y source s locate d withi n acontiguou s are aan dunde r commo ncontro l emi t

o r hav e th e potentia l t o emit , considerin g controls , atota l o f 1 0 tp y o r

mor e o f an y singl e HA Po r 2 5 tp y o r

mor e of an y combinatio n of

HAP
. Unde r th e EPA' s 199 5 Potentia l t o Emi t Transitio n Policy , Stat e an dloca l ai r regulator s hav e th e optio nof treatin g th e followin g type s o f

source s a s nonmajo r unde r sectio n 11 2 an dpermi t program s unde r

titl e V ofth e CAA : (1 ) source s tha t

maintai nadequat e record s t o demonstrat e tha t

thei r actua l emission s ar e les s tha n 5 0 percen t o f th e applicabl e majo r

sourc e threshol dan d hav e continue dt o operat e a t les s tha n 5 0 percen t

of th e threshol dsinc e Januar y 1994 ; an d(2 ) source s wit h actua l emission s betwee n 5 0 an d10 0 percen t o f th e threshold , bu t

whic hhol d State-enforceabl e limit s tha t ar e enforceabl e a s apractica l matter
. Durin g th e EPA' s rulemakin g relate dt o th e potentia l t o emi t

(PTE ) requirement s i n th e Genera l Provision s (4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t A ) an dth e titl e V operatin g permit s program , w e hav e issue dthre e extension s t o th e origina l transitio n policy , th e lates t

memorandu mdate d Decembe r

20,199 9 an dentitled , "Thir d Extensio n o f

Januar y 25,199 5 Potentia l t o Emi t Transitio nPolicy. " Source s tha t compl y ..wit

heithe r of th e tw o criteri a liste dabov e wil l no t

b e considere da majo r sourc e unde r

th e OLD NESHAP
. However , source s wil l b e require dt o compl y wit hth e applicabl e provision s of th e fina l PT Erul e a s of th e effectiv e dat e of tha t rule
. Organi c liquid s distributio n operation s tha t

d o no t mee t th e criteri a fo r amajo r sourc e unde r

th e PT E transitio n polic y ar e no t bein g regulate d a t thi s time
. W e ma y conside r are a source s for

regulatio n a t

afutur e dat e a s par t of th e are asourc e strateg y authorize dunde r

sectio n112(k ) ofth e CAA
. Th e sourc e categor y covere db y th e propose dstandard s i s no t asingl e establishe d"industry " i n th e usua l

sense , bu t

involve s anumbe r

o f traditiona l industr y segments
. Th e purpos e of

th e propose dstandard s i s t o enac t control s o nmajo r

sourc e OLD operation s whereve r

the y occur , an d thi s include s avariet y of traditiona l industries
. Whil e thes e industr y segment s ar e distinc t

fromon e anotiie r (for example , the y ar e describe db y severa l differen t

SIC/NAIC S codes) , the y ar e relate dt o eac hothe r becaus e tiiey handl e simila r

type s o f liquid s whic h ar e input s o r

output s of

tiie othe r segments
. A s a n example , aparticula r organi c liquid s produce db y achemica l manufacturin g facilit y ma y b e handle d b y afor-hir e storag e terminal , an dthe n ente r anothe r manufacturin g plan t

t o b o use di nth e makin g of

aproduct
. W e believ e th e OLD sourc e categor y i s bes t explaine dthroug hadescriptio no f th e organi c liquid s an ddistributio n activitie s tha t

ar e affected , an dtiie type s o f facilitie s wher e th e OLD activitie s occur . Th e organi c liquid s affecte db y tiie propose dstandard s ar e thos e liquid s tha t contai n5 percen t

b y weigh t

o r mor e ofth e 6 9 organi c HA Pliste di n Tabl e 1 ofth e propose dsubpart
. Thes e liquid s includ e pur e HA Pchemical s (straigh t toluene , for

example) , petroleu m liquids , an dman y blende dmixture s an d solution s o f

organi c HA Pchemical s tiiat ar e store dan dtransporte di nbul k throughou t

th e economy . Th e propose d rul e woul dals o affec t

al l crud e oil , wit h th e exceptio no f

blac k oil , tha t ha s undergon e custod y transfe r ou t o f productio nfacilities , eve nthoug h individua l crude s ma y hav e atota l HA P conten t eithe r abov e o r belo w 5 percen t by.weight
. Not e tha t

gasolin e (includin g aviatio ngasoline ) distributio ni s exclude dfromth e propose dOLD NESHA Pbecaus e tiiese operation s ar e alread y covere db y th e Gasolin e Distributio n NESHAP , 4 0 CFRpar t 63 , subpar t R
. Th e OLD activitie s an dequipmen t tha t woul db e subjec t

t o th e propose d contro l requirement s are : (a) Storag e of organi c liquid s i n stationar y storag e tanks ; (b ) organi c liquid s transfe r int o carg o tank s (tan k

truck s o r

railcars ) a t transfe r racks ; an d(c ) th e equipmen t component s use di n organi c liquid s transfe r activitie s (pumps , valves , an d samplin g connectio n systems)
. Not e tiiat distributio nunde r

th e propose d standard s consist s o f

thos e activitie s involve di nstorin g organi c liquid s an d transferrin g the meithe r ont o o r of f a majo r sourc e plan t

site
. Organi c liquid s distributio ni s carrie d ou t a t thre e primar y categorie s of operations
. Firs t

i s th e stand-alon e bul k terminal , whic htypicall y receives , 

# 7P. 9



### 1568 0 Federa l Register/Vol . 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s
stores , an dsend s ou t

liquid s owne db y othe r companie s ("for-hire " facilities)
. Thes e facilitie s ar e no t

collocate dwit h amanufacturin g sit e an dwil l b e affecte di f

the y mee t

th e majo r

sourc e criteri abase do n thei r

OL D activities
. Som e chemica l companie s ow n stand

alon e terminal s t o distribut e thei r ow n liquids , an dthe y ma y als o leas e storag e spac e a t thes e terminal s t o othe r companies
. Th e secon dcategor y consist s of

OLD operation s tha t

ar e contiguou s an dunde r

commo n contro l wit hamanufacturin g (e.g. , SOCM I facilit y o r

petroleu mrefinery ) plan t site
. Th e OLD operation s tha t satisf y th e annua l throughpu t

cutof f a t plan t site s tha t constitut e amajo r

sourc e o f

HA P wil l b e subjec t

t o th e propose d standards
. Ther e ma y als o b e additiona l type s o f manufacturin g facilitie s tha t hav e affecte dOL D operations
. Th e thir d facilit y typ e i s pipelin e stations , typicall y handlin g crud e oil , tha t hav e breakou t storag e tank s use dt o absor b surge s i n th e pipelin e flo w o r t o serv e a s distributio n point s for othe r mode s (marin e vessels , etc. ) outsid e ofth e pipeline
. Sectio n 112(d)(1 ) ofth e CA A require s u s t o promulgat e NESHA Pfor "eac h categor y o r

subcategor y o f

majo r source s an dare asource s o f

hazardou s ai r pollutant s liste dfo r

regulatio n * * * " Subcategorizatio n o f

asourc e categor y i s sometime s appropriat e for NESHA P whe n industria l segment s withi n th e categor y hav e differen t

type s of processe s o r

emissio n characteristic s o r requir e th e us e o f

differen t type s o f contro l techniques
. A s w e develope d th e propose dOLD NESHAP , w e considere dwhethe r

w e shoul ddevelo p differen t contro l requirement s fo r th e variou s OLD industr y segments
. A revie w o f

th e OLD dat abas e an dth e informatio n gathere ddurin g ou r sit e visit s t o OLD facilitie s showe dthat , despit e th e extrem e operatin g condition s tha t

occu r i n th e proces s unit s a t SOCM I facilitie s an drefineries , th e liqui ddistributio noperation s a t th e variou s type s o f

facilitie s ar e carrie dou t unde r condition s a t

o r clos e t o ambient
. Furthermore , commo n organi c HA P contro l technologie s (suc ha s therma l oxidizer s an dflares ) ar e applicabl e t o an di n us e fo r

th e activitie s performe d a t al l ofth e facilit y types
. Thus , base d o n thes e factors , w e conclude dtha t designatio n o f

separat e subcategorie s fo r th e purpos e o f

developin g differen t emissio n standard s i n th e OLD NESHA P wa s no t warranted
. B. How Did

We Select

the Proposed Pollutants To Be Regulated? Th e dat abas e o f

result s fromou r

199 8 surve y of OLD operation s indicate s th e presenc e o f abou t 9 3 differen t

HA Pi n al l of th e reporte dliquids , whic hi s mos t o f th e organi c compound s o r group s o f compound s liste da s HA P unde r sectio n112(b ) ofth e CAA
. Th e variet y o f

HA Pi s s o larg e becaus e th e OLD industr y represent s th e su mtota l o f th e chemica l an dpetroleu mliquid s handle dthroughou t

industr y (excep t gasoline)
. Yet , ther e ma y b e additiona l organi c HA Pi nliquid s tha t ar e no t i n th e EPA' s OLD dat abase
. W e considere dwhethe r i t woul db e reasonabl e t o selec t

al l organi c HA P liste dunde r

sectio n112(b ) for regulatio n i n th e OLD NESHAP
. Som e organi c HA Phav e aver y lo w potentia l t o b e emitte dt o th e atmospher e from OL D operation s becaus e of thei r lo w volatilitie s (vapo r

pressur e value)
. W e d o no t conside r i t reasonabl e for facilitie s tha t

ma y hav e asignifican t

par t of thei r OLD operation s dedicate dt o handlin g low-volatilit y HA Pliquid s t o appl y control s representin g MAC T t o thos e activities
. A s aresult , w e decide di t woul db e appropriat e t o develo p alis t ofth e specifi c organi c HA Pt o b e regulate db y th e propose dstandards
. W e firs t mad e alistin g of

al l ofth e HA Pbelieve dt o exis t i n OLD operations , ranke di n orde r of decreasin g vapo r

pressur e (at

2 5 degree s C)
. W e the n selecte davapo r pressur e cutof

f o f 0. 1 poun dpe r

squar e inc habsolut e (psia ) (abou t 0. 7 kilopascal ) t o exclud e th e compound s wit hth e lowes t

volatilitie s fromth e botto mofth e table
. Thi s cutof f poin t wa s selecte dan dwa s agree dt o b y industr y reviewer s a s areasonabl e leve l belo w whic hth e emissio n potentia l woul db e minimal
. Th e 0. 7 kilopasca l vapo r pressur e cutof

f i s recommende d b y th e fac t

tha t th e HO N(i nTabl e 6 of 4 0 CFRpar t

63 , appendi x t o subpar t G) require s th e applicatio no f control s for ne w storag e vessel s wit hacapacit y o f 15 1 cubi c meter s o r

greate r an dstorin g liquid s wit havapo r

pressur e of

0. 7 kilopasca l o r

greater
. Th e propose d applicabilit y cutoff

s for OL D storag e tank s ar e simila r

t o th e cutoffs i nth e HO N(for example , ne w OLD tank s large r tha n15 1 cubi c meter s storin g an y liqui dwit havapo r

pressur e greate r tha n0. 7 kilopasca l woul db e covered)
. I f w e choos e acutof

f highe r tha n 0. 7 kilopascal , whic hwoul dleav e eve n fewe r HA Psubjec t

t o control , ther e woul db e a ninconsistenc y betwee nth e HA Ptabl e an dth e propose dstorag e tan k applicabilit y cutoffs
. Therefore , o n th e basi s o f

thes e considerations , w e use dacutof

f o f 0. 7 kilopasca l t o deriv e th e specifi c organi c HA Pliste di nTabl e 1 ofth e propose dstandards
. Th e propose dstandard s woul daffec t OLD activitie s involvin g tw o categorie s o f organi c liquids : (1 ) Thos e liquid s containin g a t

leas t 5 percen t

b y weigh t ofth e HA Pliste di nTabl e 1 ofth e propose dsubpart ; an d(2 ) al l crud e oil s excep t blac k oil
. A s wit hth e 0. 7 kilopasca l cutof

f use dt o determin e whic hHA Pwoul db e i nTabl e 1 , th e inten t ofth e 5 percen t

HA Pcutof

f i s t o exclud e th e lowes t

emittin g organi c liquid s fromth e contro l requirements
. Th e 5 percen t

HA Pcutof

f als o ha s preceden t

i nexistin g par t

6 3 subparts
. I nth e HON , 4 0 CFRpar t 63 , subpar t

H an dth e NESHA Pfor

Polycarbonat e Productio n (4 0 CF R63.1103(d) , subpar t YY) , th e equipmen t

lea k provision s affec t onl y equipmen t

containin g o r contactin g aflui dtha t

i s a t leas t 5 percen t b y weigh t

o f tota l organi c HAP , o na nannua l averag e basis
. Ou r analysi s o f

1 7 differen t

crud e oi l profile s indicate da naverag e HA P weigh t percentag e i n th e emitte dvapor s of abou t 6. 0 percent
. However , abou t hal f o f thes e sample s ha daHA P percentag e belo w 5 percent
. Unde r th e 5 percen t HA Pcutof

f definin g a regulate dorgani c liquid , thi s woul d exemp t fromcontro l alarg e amoun t o f th e crud e oi l a s i t

enter s an dleave s distributio n facilities
. Despit e it s relativel y lo w HA P content , crud e oi l ha dasignifican t vapo r pressur e tha t

wa s a s hig ha s 8 psi a an daverage dabou t

3. 5 psi afo r

al l ofth e profil e dat aw e examined
. Also , crud e oi l i s estimate dt o mak e u p approximatel y 6 8 percen t o f th e volum e o f organi c liquid s i n th e distributio n system , an d8 4 percen t

ofth e volum e for liquid s wit haHA Pconten t belo w 1 0 percent
. Sinc e th e potentia l emission s fromcrud e oi l ar e asignifican t fraction ofth e tota l OLD emissions , w e believ e tha t th e potentia l reduction s from controllin g crud e oi l woul db e significan t

an dar e acompellin g reaso n t o regulat e al l distribute dcrud e oi l excep t fo r th e specifi c variet y discusse d below
. Blac k oi l i s afor mo f

crud e oi l tha t

w e determine di nth e fina l NESHA Pfor Oi l an dGas Production , 4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t HH , t o hav e aver y lo w potentia l t o produc e flashemission s fromstorag e tanks
. Furthermore , tank s containin g blac k oi l ar e no t

considere dt o bei affecte dsource s unde r

subpar t HH
. W e ar e includin g asimila r

exemptio n for blac k oi l i nth e OLD NESHA Pbecaus e w e d o no t

conside r storag e o r

transfe r of blac k oi l t o constitut e asignifican t emissio nsource . Th e definitio n o f blac k oi l i s bein g altere dfromtha t use di n subpar t HH
. I n subpar t

H H i t i s th e "initia l producing " gas-to-oi l rati o an d AP I (America nPetroleu mInstitute ) gravit y tha t

ar e use dt o defin e som e crud e oil s a s blac k

oil
. Fo r thi s propose dP.1 0

Federa l Register/Vol
. 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s 1568 1 subpart , w e ar e usin g th e gas-to-oi l rati o an dAP I gravit y o f

th e crud e oi l a t

th e poin t o f entr y t o th e distributio n syste m t o defin e th e crud e oi l a s blac k oil
. C. How Did

We Select

the Proposed Affected Source? Th e affecte dsourc e woul db e th e combinatio n o f

al l regulate demissio n source s a t

a n OLD operation s facility
. Th e regulate demissio n source s at a n OLD operation s facilit y are : • Storag e tanks ; • Transfe r

racks ; an d
• Equipmen t

i n organi c liquid s service
. W e hav e chose n abroa dsourc e definitio n whic hallow s astorag e tank , transfe r rack , o r singl e piec e o f equipmen t

t o b e replace do r

upgrade d withou t it s replacemen t

bein g designate da s ane w source . Th e broa d sourc e definitio n wa s chose n for thi s sourc e categor y becaus e amor e narro w sourc e definitio n woul dmea n tha t a chang e t o a n individua l regulate d emissio n sourc e a t

afacilit y coul dcaus e tha t individua l emissio n sourc e t o b e designate da s new . Th e designatio n a s ne w woul dmea n tha t

th e individua l emissio n sourc e (suc ha s asingl e storag e tank ) woul db e require dt o observ e th e emissio n o r

operatin g limit s i n th e propose dsubpar t

for ne w sources . I t als o mean s tha t

th e emissio n sourc e woul dnee dt o b e permitte dseparately , an dit s recordkeepin g an dreportin g requirement s coul dfal l o n interval s differen t fromth e res t

o f th e facility
. W e looke da t th e emission s reduction s tha t coul dpossibl y b e gaine dthroug ha narro w definitio n o f

affecte dsourc e an d decide dthat , o n balance , abroa d definitio n i s th e bette r

choice
. D. How Did

We Determine the Basis and Level ofthe Proposed

Standards for Existing and

New Sources? 1
. MAC T Floo r

Determinatio n W e determine dseparat e MAC T floors fo r eac hof th e emissio n source s tha t exis t a t OLD operations
. W e receive d dat athroug hquestionnair e response s fro m24 7 facilitie s owne do r operate db y 7 7 companies
. Thes e facilitie s reflecte d th e variou s majo r

industr y segment s involve di n organi c liquid s distribution
. However , du e t o th e pervasiv e natur e of distributio n operation s throughou t th e economy , w e believ e tha t ou r surve y onl y capture dabou t

4 0 percen t

of al l o f th e larg e OLD operation s i nth e country
. Additiona l detaile dinformatio n wa s obtaine dfromsit e visit s t o nin e OL D facilities
. Th e dat acollecte drepresen t a complet e rang e o f

th e larg e facilitie s tha t woul db e affecte db y th e propose d standard
. Therefore , w e believ e th e dat a ar e representativ e o f OLD operation s tiiroughout

th e country
. W e determine dMAC T floors for existin g source s base do n th e arithmeti c averag e ofth e lowest-emittin g 1 2 percen t wher e thi s approac hmad e sens e an dproduce daresul t

tha t corresponde d t o us e of aspecifi c contro l technology
. Fo r th e remainin g cases , w e use dth e media n (middle ) valu e t o represen t th e MAC T floor. Fo r

storag e tank s an d transfe r racks , floor s wer e determine d for eac hsubgrou p (siz e an dvapo r pressur e rang e for

tanks , vapo r

pressur e rang e for loadin g positions)
. Fo r th e severa l storag e tan k

subgroup s wit h fewe r tha n3 0 sources , w e use dth e . media n of

th e five lowest-emittin g tank s (th e thir dtank)
. Usin g th e storag e tan k

dat acollecte d fromOLD operations , w e determine d th e relativ e emission s from1,17 5 reporte dtank s an dliste dthes e tank s fro mlowes t

t o highes t

emittin g witiii n severa l tan k

siz e an dliqui dvapo r pressur e ranges . Fo r

transfe r racks , w e liste dindividua l loadin g position s from lowes t t o highes t

emitting , startin g wit h thos e wit hacontro l device , followe db y thos e usin g botto mo r

submerge d loading , an dfinally thos e usin g splas h fil l (considere dth e baseline , uncontrolle dcase)
. Fo r

equipmen t leaks , th e facilitie s wit haFedera l LDA R progra mwer e liste dfirst , followe db y thos e wit haStat e o r

loca l program , an d the nthos e wit hn o program . Th e bes t controlle dstorag e tank s a t OL D facilitie s i nou r

dat abas e us e eithe r aclose dven t

syste man dcontro l devic e o r awell-designe dinterna l o r externa l floatin g roof
. Thes e control s represen t th e maximu mleve l of

contro l availabl e for storag e tanks
. Th e existin g sourc e MAC T floor

for tank s wa s determine dt o b e achoic e of

contro l devic e o r

a floatin g roo f

wit heffectiv e emissio n seals
. Th e specifi c tan k

size s an d organi c liquid s t o whic hth e MAC T floo r applie s ar e essentiall y th e sam e a s thos e i n th e HON
. Th e bes t controlle dtransfe r

rack s a t th e OL D operation s facilitie s i nou r surve y dat abas e ar e equippe dwit ha vapo r collectio nsyste man dcontro l devic e t o reduc e organi c HA P emissions
. Contro l efficiencie s for thes e device s wer e reporte da s rangin g from belo w 9 0 percen t

t o ove r 9 9 percent , bu t n o tes t dat awer e provide dt o suppor t thes e contro l efficiencies
. Th e MAC T floor for existin g transfe r

rack s wa s determine dt o b e th e us e of acontro l device , withou t

identifyin g an y specifi c contro l efficiencie s tha t constitut e th e floor. However , base do nth e type s o f device s i nus e an dth e liquid s bein g controlled , w e believ e tha t acontro l efficienc y o f 9 5 percen t

i s appropriat e for thi s floor
. Th e bes t controlle dOL D equipmen t i s subjec t t o a n instrument-base dLDAR program , an dw e foun dtha t a n LDAR progra msimila r

t o th e HO Nprogra m represent s th e existin g sourc e MAC T floor
. Fo r ne w sources , th e CA A require s th e MAC T floo r

t o b e base do n th e degre e o f emission s reduction s achieve d i n practic e b y th e best-controlle dsimila r source . Th e MAC T floo r for ne w source s an dexistin g source s i s th e sam e i n tiie cas e o f transfe r rack s (us e o f

acontro l device ) an dequipmen t

leak s (a n instrumen t

LDARprogram)
. Fo r

storag e tanks , th e contro l technologie s i n th e MAC T floors fo r

existin g an dne w source s ar e als o th e same . However , i n th e ne w sourc e floor , thes e control s ar e applie dt o smalle r

tank s an dt o les s volatil e liquid s whe n the y ar e store di n large r tanks
. A mor e detaile dsummar y o f th e MAC T floo r

analysis , includin g th e dat a an dth e consideration s use dt o determin e th e MAC T floors for OLD operations , ca n b e foun di ntli e technica l suppor t

documen t

locate di n th e docket
. 2
. Beyond-the-Floo r

Level s of

Contro l Usin g th e MAC T floor

level s a s a startin g point , w e investigate dwhetiie r an y applicabl e contro l approache s wer e availabl e tiiat

wer e bot hmor e stringen t tha n thes e floor s an dsatisfie dtiie criteri ai n sectio n112(d)(2 ) ofth e CAA
. Th e MAC T floors for

existin g an dne w organi c liquid s storag e tank s consis t of achoic e betwee ntiie emissio n limitatio n i nth e HO N(close dven t syste man dcontro l devic e a t 9 5 percen t efficiency ) an dth e floating roo f requirement s i n 4 0 CFRpar t 63 , subpar t WW
. Thes e control s represen t th e maximu mleve l o f

contro l availabl e for storag e tanks
. Th e tan k

capacit y an d liqui dvapo r

pressur e cutoffs definin g whic htank s woul db e affecte dar e th e sam e a s thos e i n th e HON
. W e believ e tha t thes e cutoffs defin e al l o f th e storag e tank s tha t

i t i s reasonabl e t o regulat e wit hMAC T technology
. Therefore , w e wer e no t

abl e t o identif

y an y reasonabl e technologie s tha t woul d creat e beyond-the-floo r

contro l level s for storag e tanks
. Th e bes t controlle dorgani c liquid s transfe r rack s achiev e emission s reduction s o f

9 5 percen t

o r greate r usin g aclose dven t

syste man dcontro l device
. Du e t o th e diversit y of

liquid s handle d i n th e industr y an dth e consequen t us e o f avariet y of

contro l devices , w e conclude dtha t

level s abov e 9 5 percen t shoul dno t

b e considere da s a n alternativ e contro l leve l fo r transfe r


# 4P.1 1



### 1568 2 Federa l Register/Vol . 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s racks
. Therefore , n o beyond-the-floo r contro l level s wer e deeme dachievabl e for thi s emissio n source . Th e bes t controlle dOLD equipmen t i s subjec t t o a n instrument-base dLDAR program , an dw e foun dtha t a nLDAR progra msimila r

t o th e HO Nprogra m represent s bot hth e existin g an dne w sourc e MAC T floors
. W e hav e no t identifie dan y beyond-the-floo r contro l approache s tha t

provid e bette r

contro l o f leakag e emission s fro mequipmen t a t areasonabl e cost
. 3
. Selectio n ofth e Standard s Som e OLD operation s ma y involv e ver y lo w organi c liquid s throughput s becaus e the y operat e intermittently , bu t the y woul dstil l b e define da s amajo r sourc e i f the y ar e o n th e sam e plan t sit e a s amajo r

sourc e manufacturin g operation
. W e desire dasmal l siz e cutof f t o exemp t

OLD operation s wit haver y smal l amoun t

o f distributio n activity
. Th e surve y dat adi dno t indicat e an y specifi c organi c liquid s throughpu t int o o r ou t of afacilit y tha t

woul dhel p u s i n identifyin g alowe r

siz e threshol dfor th e siz e o f

OLD operation s facilit y tha t shoul db e affecte db y th e propose d standards
. Therefore , w e turne dt o existin g Federa l an dStat e organi c liquid s transfe r

rules
. Th e cutof

f valu e o f 20,00 0 gallon s pe r

da y i s frequentl y use dt o identif

y affecte dtransfe r facilities
. Thi s valu e convert s t o 27. 6 millio n liter s pe r

year , th e smalles t

siz e facilit y w e ar e proposin g t o affec t b y thes e standards
. Thi s i s areasonabl e approac ha s facilitie s belo w thi s siz e cutof f d o no t hav e th e volum e o f

organi c liquid s throughpu t

tha t woul dyiel d emission s warrantin g control , a s identifie db y othe r

Federa l an dStat e rules
. I f th e throughput s int o an dou t of th e facilit y durin g acalenda r yea r ar e different , the n th e large r o f th e tw o value s woul db e use dt o determin e whethe r th e operatio n i s affecte db y thes e propose dstandards
. Th e propose dstandard s wer e selecte d followin g th e completio n o f th e MAC T floo r an dbeyond-the-floo r

analyses
. Afte r w e determine dtha t

ther e wer e n o reasonabl e contro l measure s mor e stringen t tha n th e MAC T floors, w e use d th e floor s a s th e basi s for th e selectio n ofth e standards
. Whil e som e o f ou r surve y response s appeare dt o indicat e contro l level s beyon dth e level s normall y associate dwit hthes e device s (i.e. , man y report s a t

o r nea r 10 0 percen t efficiency) , w e believe dtha t thes e value s di dno t

represen t

th e continuou s performanc e o f

th e contro l device s i n use . Also , thes e hig hefficienc y value s wer e no t supporte db y tes t

data
. Therefore , acontro l efficienc y o f 9 5 percen t i s bein g propose dfor

contro l device s use dfor storag e tank s o r

transfe r racks
. T o b e consisten t

wit hth e result s fromth e tes t

method s allowe dfor showin g compliance , thi s contro l efficienc y ca n b e demonstrate di n term s of eithe r tota l organi c HA Po r

TOC
. I n addition , combustio ndevice s hav e a n optiona l emissio nlimi t o f 2 0 ppm v of organi c HA Po r

TO C i n th e exhaust
. Som e transfe r

rack s a t OLD facilitie s ar e use donl y o n aperiodi c o r intermitten t

basi s and , therefore , hav e relativel y lo w volum e throughput s an d lo w emissions
. W e d o no t believ e i t woul db e reasonabl e t o instal l acontro l syste mo nsuc hlo w usag e racks
. However , th e surve y dat adi dno t indicat e an y specifi c throughpu t leve l belo w whic htransfe r

rac k emissio n control s wer e no t

bein g use di nOL

D operations
. A s th e surve y dat acoul dno t provid e directio no nathroughpu t cutoff , w e searche dexistin g Federa l an dStat e ai r rule s t o evaluat e th e cutoffs i nuse . Th e provision s of

4 0 CFR63.1101 , subpar t Y Y (Generi c MAC T Standards) , defin e a lo w throughpu t

transfe r rac k a s arac k tha t transfer s les s tha n11. 8 millio n liter s (3.1 2 millio ngallons ) pe r yea r o f liqui dcontainin g regulate dHAP
. Thi s cutof f i s equivalen t

t o abou t on e tan k truc k ful l of liqui dpe r

day
. N o additiona l cutoffs affectin g individua l transfe r rack s wer e identified
. Th e cutof f use di nsubpar t

Y Y wa s considere dreasonabl e for th e OL D transfe r rac k contro l requirement , and , therefore , w e ar e proposin g t o regulat e onl y thos e transfe r

rac k position s tha t loa d11. 8 millio nliter s pe r yea r o r mor e of organi c liquid
. A transfe r

rac k ma y hav e mor e tha n on e loadin g positio n (i.e. , "parkin g spot" ) fo r

carg o tanks
. Sinc e eac h loadin g positio n ma y receiv e liqui d fromaspecifi c storag e tan k independentl y ofth e othe r positions , eac hpositio n ca nb e considere da n individua l emissio n sourc e durin g th e tim e tha t acarg o tan k

i s i n plac e an d loadin g liquid
. Therefore , w e ar e proposin g t o appl y bot hth e emissio n limi t an dthroughpu t

cutof f t o eac h individua l loadin g position
. Unde r thi s approach , owner s an doperator s woul d hav e maximu mflexibility i n determinin g th e optimu mconfiguratio n fo r thei r loadin g activities
. A t controlle dtransfe r

rack s (thos e equippe dwit havapo r

collectio n syste m an dacontro l device) , fugitiv e emission s ma y occu r

fromleakin g truc k

transpor t tank s o r railcar s throug hdom e covers , malfunctionin g pressur e relie f vents , o r othe r potentia l lea k

sources . Thus , a requiremen t

t o contro l liqui dtransfe r operation s usin g avapo r Collectio n syste man dcontro l devic e coul db e ineffectiv e i f th e carg o tank s lea k

vapor s t o th e atmospher e durin g th e loadin g process . Fo r

carg o tank s equippe dwit h vapo r collectio n equipmen t

(whic h typicall y include s a nintegrate dvapo r valv e tha t

i s opene dt o releas e vapor s t o th e contro l syste mdurin g loading) , EPA Metho d2 7 i n4 0 CFRpar t 60 , appendi x A , i s specifie dfo r

ensurin g th e tank' s vapo r tightness
. Tan k

truck s use dfor gasolin e distributio n ar e routinel y equippe dfo r

vapo r collectio n an d underg o a nannua l Metho d2 7 tes t unde r th e NESHA Pregulatin g gasolin e distribution
. However , tan k truck s i n organi c chemica l servic e typicall y ar e no t equippe dfo r

vapo r collection
. Fo r thes e tanks , Metho d2 7 woul dno t b e applicable
. Instead , th e curren t DO T method s whic hrequir e periodi c lea k testin g o f chemica l tan k

truck s an d railcar s ar e i n plac e an deffectiv e for organi c liquid s carg o tanks
. E. How Did

We Select

the Format

of the Proposed Standards? Th e forma t

selecte dfor

th e propose d standard s wa s develope dafte r a comprehensiv e revie w o f Federa l an d Stat e rule s affectin g th e sam e emissio n source s tha t

occu r i n simila r

industries
. Ou r goa l wa s t o se t

a noveral l forma t tha t i s compatibl e wit hth e applicabl e tes t methods , reflect s th e performanc e o f th e MAC T technologies , an di s consisten t

wit hth e format s use di n othe r NESHA Pfor

simila r HA Psources . Th e propose dstandard s fo r OLD operation s consis t

o f acombinatio n of severa l formats : numerica l emissio n limit s an doperatin g limits , equipmen t standards , an dwor k

practic e standards
. Sectio n112(h ) ofth e CA A state s tha t " * * * i f i t i s no t feasibl e i nth e judgmen t

of th e Administrato r

t o prescrib e o r

enforc e a n emissio n standar dfor

contro l o f

ahazardou s ai r pollutan t o r pollutants , th e Administrato r

may , i nlie u thereof , promulgat e adesign , equipment , wor k practice , o r

operationa l standard , o r combinatio nthereo f

* * *. " Sectio n 112(h ) furthe r

define s th e phras e "no t feasibl e t o prescrib e o r

enforc e a n emissio nstandard " a s an y situatio n i n which" * * * ahazardou s ai r pollutan t o r pollutant s canno t

b e emitte dthroug h aconveyanc e designe dan dconstructe d t o emi t o r captur e suc hpollutant , * * * o r th e applicatio n of

measuremen t methodolog y t o aparticula r clas s of source s i s no t

practicabl e * * *. " Numerica l emissio n limit s ar e feasibl e for storag e tank s an dtransfe r rack s outfitte dwit haclose dven t syste man d acontro l device
. Fo r

thes e contro l situations , w e hav e propose da percentag e contro l efficienc y for consistenc y wit hth e HO N an dth e



# /OFedera l Register/Vol . 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s 

### 1568 3

Refiner y NESHAP , whic htake n together , regulat e agrea t numbe r o f th e organi c liquid s handle di n OLD operations
. T o allo w flexibility , w e ar e proposin g a9 5 percen t

contro l efficienc y limi t

i n term s o f

eithe r tota l organi c HA Po r

TOC
. Fo r

combustio n devices , w e ar e proposin g a n alternat e emissio n limi t

o f 2 0 ppm v o f

eithe r organi c HA Po r

TOC
. Dependin g o n th e tes t method s chosen , th e owne r o r operato r woul dselec t

th e mos t suitabl e format
. Th e propose d9 5 percen t an d2 0 ppm v limit s appl y no t

t o entir e transfe r rack s bu t t o eac hindividua l loadin g positio n a t

th e racks
. W e fel t

tha t unde r thi s format , source s woul dhav e mor e freedomi n choosin g ho w t o organiz e th e transfe r

o f affecte dorgani c liquids
. Fo r example , a t

arac k wit htw o loadin g position s yo u migh t

designat e an d configur e on e positio n t o b e a n uncontrolle dposition , an danothe r positio n t o b e acontrolle dpositio n pipe dthroug havapo r

collectio n syste m t o acontro l device
. Yo u coul dthe n loa d affecte dorgani c liquid s onl y a t th e controlle dpositio n bu t

coul dstil l loa d unregulate dliquid s throug hth e sam e rac k a t th e uncontrolle dposition
. Equipmen t

an dwor k

practic e standard s affec t

eac ho f th e emissio n source s bein g regulated
. Th e followin g subparagraph s describ e th e selectio n o f thes e formats
. Floating Roof

Standard

for Storage Tanks Yo u woul dhav e th e optio n o f installin g floatin g roofs tha t mee t th e requirement s o f

4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t WW , i n you r

affecte dstorag e tanks
. Th e floatin g roo f

optio n ha s bee ninclude d i n mos t Federa l rule s affectin g storag e tanks
. Ou r

goa l wa s t o b e consisten t wit hthes e othe r

rule s an dt o provid e yo u wit hflexibilit y i n controllin g th e storag e tank s tha t

contai naffecte d organi c liquids
. Vapor Tightness Testing for

Cargo Tanks Fo r th e close dven t

(vapo r collection ) syste mo n transfe r

rack s t o b e effectiv e i n conveyin g al l o f

th e displace dHA P vapor s t o th e contro l device , th e carg o tank s mus t

b e maintaine di n awa y tha t minimize s leakage
. Ther e i s n o mean s availabl e fo r

collectin g o r

measurin g thes e leakag e emissions
. Therefore , w e hav e propose dawor k

practic e standar d consistin g of

a n annua l vapo r

tightnes s tes t whic hinvolve s pressurizin g th e empt y tan k

an dmeasurin g an y los s of pressure . Th e sam e approac hi s use dfor carg o tank s i n tw o o f

th e Federa l rule s tha t affec t gasolin e distribution , th e ne w sourc e performanc e standard s (NSPS ) for bul k gasolin e terminal s (4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , subpar t

XX) , an dth e Gasolin e Distributio nNESHA P(4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t R)
. Leak Detection and

Repair Program for Equipment Th e LDA Rprogra mha s bee nuse dfor man y year s a s th e principa l mean s of locatin g leakin g equipmen t for repair s t o maintai n lo w emissio nrate s o n equipmen t

components
. I nsurveyin g OL D operation s nationwide , w e foun d tha t abou t 3 5 percen t

ofth e facilitie s ar e unde r aFedera l LDARrequirement
. Therefore , w e decide dtha t thi s forma t woul db e th e bes t

approac hfor

th e equipmen t

requirements
. Owner s an d operator s woul dhav e th e choic e betwee n th e LDARrequirement s i n4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t

T T o r UU
. F. How Did

We Select

the Proposed Testing and

Initial Compliance Requirements? Thes e NESHA Ppropos e t o contro l thre e differen t

emissio npoints : Storag e tanks , transfe r

racks , an dequipmen t leaks
. Th e contro l technologie s an d wor k practice s use dt o contro l thes e emissio n point s woul dhav e differen t testin g an dinitia l complianc e requirements
. Th e metiiod s propose d for testin g an dfor

demonstratin g initia l complianc e wit hth e propose d standard s ar e simila r

t o tiiose i n othe r Federa l NESHA Pusin g thes e sam e contro l technologie s an dwor k practices
. Th e HO N (4 0 CF

Rpar t 63 , subpar t

G ) prescribe s EP A Metho d1 8 o r 25 A for determinin g th e contro l efficienc y o f a contro l device
. W e hav e adde dEP A Metho d2 5 t o allo w additiona l flexibility. I naddition , i f aprincipa l componen t

of th e inle t ga s strea mt o th e contro l devic e i s formaldehyde , EP A Metho d31 6 o f

4 0 CFRpar t

63 , appendi x A , ma y b e use dinstea do f Metho d1 8 t o measur e th e formaldehyde
. Th e HO Nals o specifie s EP A Metho d 2 1 for performin g LDARmonitoring
. Th e visua l an dsea l ga p inspection s propose dfor

determinin g th e initia l complianc e o f

floating roo f

tank s ar e th e method s outline di nsubpar t W Wof 4 0 CF Rpar t 63
. Th e EP A Metho d2 7 i s th e metho dpropose dfor

confirmin g th e vapo r tightnes s o f

tan k truck s an d railcar s equippe dwit hvapo r collectio n equipment
. Thi s i s th e sam e approac h require dfor

testin g carg o tank s i n 4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t

R , th e Gasolin e Distributio nNESHAP
. W e hav e determine dwhil e developin g othe r par t 6 3 rule s tha t

thes e method s ar e appropriat e for

fulfillin g th e testin g an d initia l complianc e requirement s i n standard s for

HA Pemissions
. G. How Did We Select

the Proposed Continuous Compliance Requirements? Continuou s monitorin g i s require db y th e propose dstandard s s o tha t w e ca n determin e whethe r

asourc e i s i n complianc e o na n ongoin g basis
. Whe n determinin g appropriat e monitorin g options , w e considere dtiie availabilit y an dfeasibilit y of

anumbe r

o f monitorin g strategies
. I nevaluatin g th e us e of continuou s emissio n monitorin g system s (CEMS ) i n thes e propose dstandards , w e determine dtha t

monitorin g of

HA P compound s emitte dfromcontro l device s i s feasibl e an dha s bee n implemente di notiie r

rule s a t certai n type s of facilities
. However , th e cos t o f applyin g monitor s tha t

provid e a continuou s measuremen t i ntiie unit s o

f tiiese propose dstandard s woul db e unacceptabl y high
. Similarly , w e foun d tha t continuou s monitorin g o f aHA P surrogat e (suc ha s TOC ) woul dno t provid e a naccurat e indicatio n o f complianc e wit hth e propose dHA P emissio nlimitation s becaus e of di e man y non-HA Porgani c compounds
. Monitorin g o f

contro l devic e operatin g parameter s i s considere d appropriat e for

man y othe r

emissio n source s (suc ha s gasolin e distributio n source s unde r

4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , subpar t R ) and , therefore , w e hav e include dtiiis a s th e primar y monitorin g approac hi n thes e propose dstandards
. Base do n informatio n fromOLD sources , w e selecte doperatin g parameter s fb r th e followin g type s of

contro l device s tha t ar e reliabl e indicator s o f contro l devic e performance : Therma l an dcatalyti c oxidizers , flares, adsorbers , an d condensers
. I ngeneral , w e selecte d parameter s an dmonitorin g provision s tha t wer e include di n bot hsubpar t R an dth e HON
. Source s woul dmonito r thes e parameter s t o demonstrat e continuou s complianc e wit htiie emissio n limit s an doperatin g limits
. Th e propose dNESHA Pals o require s monitorin g for

th e storag e tan k

wor k practic e standard s whic hconsis t o f periodi c inspections ' of

th e floatin g roo f seals
. W e too k

thi s approac hbecaus e ther e i s n o devic e availabl e t o continuousl y monito r

th e performanc e of th e roo f seals
. Yo u ma y choos e a n alternativ e t o th e monitorin g require db y tiiese propose d standards
. If

yo u do , yo u woul dhav e t o reques t approva l for

alternativ e monitorin g accordin g t o th e procedure s i n § 63. 8 of

th e Genera l Provisions
. H. How Did

We Select

the Proposed Notification, Recordkeeping, and Reporting Requirements? Th e require dnotification s an dothe r reportin g ar e base do n th e Genera l



### / /P.1 3



### 1568 4 Federa l Register/Vol
. 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s Provision s i n subpar t

A o f 4 0 CF Rpar t 63
. Th e initia l notificatio n an dth e semiannua l complianc e report s includ e informatio n o n organi c liquid s an d affecte dOLD activities , an dthe y woul d requir e an y change s t o thi s informatio n t o b e reporte di n subsequen t reports
. Similarly , record s woul db e require d tha t wil l enabl e a n inspecto r t o verif y th e facility' s complianc e status
. Du e t o th e natur e o f

contro l device s tha t

woul d b e installe do n OL D operation s an dth e emission s bein g controlled , w e hav e determine dtha t

contro l devic e paramete r

monitorin g i s appropriat e i n thi s circumstance
. Th e propose drecord s an dreport s ar e necessar y t o allo w th e regulator y authorit y t o verif y tha t th e sourc e i s continuin g t o compl y wit hth e standards
. IV . Summar y o f

Environmental , Energy , an d Economi cImpact s A s discusse dearlier , organi c liquid s distributio n activitie s ar e carrie dou t a t man y differen t

type s of facilities
. Mos t o f thes e facilitie s ca n b e groupe dunde r thre e genera l categories : Stand-alon e (usuall y for-hire ) storag e terminal s dedicate dt o distributio n activities ; OLD operation s collocate dwit hapetroleu m refinery , chemica l manufacturing , o r othe r manufacturin g plan t

site ; an d crud e oi l pipelin e pumpin g o r breakou t station s (containin g crud e oi l tankage)
. W e estimat e tha t

i n 1997 , th e baselin e yea r for th e propose dstandards , ther e wer e approximatel y th e followin g number s o f

majo r sourc e OLD facilities : 48 0 collocate dOLD operations , 13 5 stand-alon e terminals , an d3 5 crud e oi l pipelin e stations , for

atota l o f

abou t 65 0 existin g majo r

sourc e OLD plan t

sites
. A. What Are the Air

Quality Impacts? O n anationwid e basis , th e OLD operation s a t

facilitie s tha t

woul db e affecte db y th e propose dNESHA Pemi t a n estimate d70,20 0 Mg/y r (77,30 0 tons / yr ) of HAP
. Mos t

ofth e organi c HA P liste di n sectio n 112(b)(1 ) ofth e CA A ar e include di n thes e emissions
. Afte r th e promulgate dstandard s ar e implemented , HA Pemission s wil l b e reduce db y approximatel y 19,70 0 Mg/y r (21,70 0 tpy) , o r

2 8 percent , fromth e baseline
. Suc hemission s impact s ar e likel y t o reduc e th e ris k o f advers e effect s of HAP
. Althoug hth e propose dOLD NESHA P woul dno t

specificall y requir e contro l o f VO C emissions , th e organi c HA P emissio n contro l technologie s upo n whic hth e propose dstandard s ar e base d woul dals o significantl y reduc e VO C emission s fromth e sourc e category
. W e estimat e tha t

implementatio n o f

th e promulgate dNESHA Pwoul dreduc e nationwid e VO C emission s b y abou t 33,70 0 Mg/y r (37,10 0 tpy) , o r

2 8 percent , frombaselin e levels
. Thi s wil l hav e th e effec t

o f reducin g ozone-relate d healt han dwelfar e impacts
. B. What Are the Cost

Impacts? Th e cos t o f implementin g th e propose dstandard s for

affecte dOLD operation s woul dconsis t ofth e capita l an dannualize dcost s t o contro l storag e tanks , transfe r

racks , an dequipmen t leaks , an dth e cost s o f

complyin g wit h th e monitoring , reporting , an d recordkeepin g requirements
. Approximatel y 1,74 0 storag e tanks , o r 2 3 percen t

ofth e 7,72 5 tank s use di n OLD operations , woul dnee dt o b e controlle d(o r

furthe r controlled ) t o mee t th e propose dcontro l requirements
. Dependin g o n th e siz e an dconfiguratio n o f aparticula r

tank , th e capita l cos t woul dvar y from$4,30 0 t o $120,00 0 pe r tank
. Th e tota l capita l cos t t o contro l al l 1,74 0 tank s i s estimate da t $84. 3 million
. Transfe r rac k control s woul dconsis t o f installin g aflare o r

othe r contro l devic e a t approximatel y 20 0 OL

D operations , a t

a nestimate dtota l capita l cos t of $5. 4 million
. Sinc e organi c liquid s carg o tank s ar e typicall y no t equippe dwit hvapo r

collectio n equipment , mos t

o f the mwoul d continu e t o underg o th e DO T lea k tightnes s testin g an dno t th e annua l EP A Metiio d2 7 testing
. Th e tota l annua l cos t for performin g Metho d2 7 o n th e smal l numbe r o f equippe dcarg o tank s i s estimate da t

abou t $21,70 0 pe r

year . Th e establishmen t

of a nLDAR progra mfor

equipmen t

lea k contro l a t abou t 43 0 existin g operation s nationwid e woul dinvolv e acapita l cos t of approximatel y $3. 5 million
. Th e annua l cos t

for industr y t o kee p record s an dprepar e an dsen dth e necessar y report s i s estimate da t abou t $12. 7 millio npe r

year . W e hav e estimate dth e tota l nationwid e capita l cos t (i n 199 7 dollars ) of implementin g th e propose drul e a t $94. 4 million , an dth e annua l cos t a t $41. 4 millio npe r

year . W e ar e solicitin g commen t fromth e publi c o nth e accurac y of

th e cos t impact s tha t

ar e summarize dabov e an dpresente di n detai l i n th e TSD
. C. What Are the Economic Impacts? Th e economi c impac t

analysi s show s tha t th e expecte dpric e increas e for affecte doutpu t

woul db e les s tha n0.0 1 percen t a s aresul t

o f th e propose d standar dfor

petroleu mproducers , pipelin e operators , an dpetroleu mbul k terminals , an dles s tha n 0.0 2 percen t for chemica l manufacturers
. Th e expecte d chang e i nproductio n of affecte doutpu t i s areductio n of

les s tha n0.0 1 percen t for petroleu mproducers , pipelin e operators , an dpetroleu mbul k terminals , an dles s tha n 0.0 2 percen t for chemica l manufacturers
. Non e ofth e facilitie s ou t

ofth e 65 1 affecte dar e expecte dt o clos e a s aresul t o f incurrin g cost s o f th e propose dstandard
. Therefore , i t

i s likel y tha t

ther e i s n o advers e impac t

expecte dt o occu r

for thos e industrie s tha t

produc e outpu t affecte db y thi s propose drule , suc ha s chemica l manufacturers , petroleu m refineries , pipelin e operators , an d petroleu mbul k

termina l operators
. D. What Are the Nonair

Quality Health, Environmental, and

Energy Impacts? Wate r qualit y woul dno t

b e significantl y affecte db y implementatio n ofth e proposed-standards
. Th e propose dstandard s d o no t contai nan y requirement s relate dt o wate r discharges , wastewate r

collection , o r spil l containment , an dn o additiona l organi c liquid s ar e expecte dt o ente r thes e area s a s aresul t

o f th e propose d OLD NESHAP
. A fe w facilitie s ma y selec t ascrubbe r

(dependin g o n th e specifi c emission s the y ar e controlling ) t o contro l emission s fromtransfe r rack s o r fixed-roo f

storag e tanks
. Th e impac t o nwate r qualit y fro mth e us e o f scrubber s i s no t

expecte dt o b e significant
. W e als o projec t

tha t ther e wil l b e n o significan t

soli dwast e o r

nois e impact
. Neithe r flares , therma l oxidizers , scrubbers , no r

condenser s generat e an y soli dwast e a s aby-produc t o f thei r operation
. Whe nadsorptio nsystem s ar e used , th e spen t

activate dcarbo n o r

othe r adsorben t

tiiat canno t b e furthe r regenerate dma y b e dispose do f i na landfill , whic hwoul dcontribut e asmal l amoun t o f soli dwaste
. W e hav e teste dth e nois e leve l from contro l device s an dfoun dthes e level s (usuall y du e t o pump s an dblowers ) t o b e moderat e (les s tha n 7 0 decibel s a t 7 meters)
. Thus , th e nois e impac t woul d b e small
. Th e contro l device s use dfor transfe r rac k an dstorag e tan k

contro l us e electri c motor-drive n blowers , dampers , o r pumps , dependin g o n th e typ e of system , i n additio nt o electroni c contro l an dmonitorin g systems
. Th e installatio no f

thes e device s woul dhav e asmal l negativ e energ y impact
. T o th e exten t tha t som e ofth e controlle d organi c liquid s ar e non-gasolin e fuels , th e applie dcontro l measure s woul d kee p thes e liquid s i nth e distributio n syste man dthu s hav e apositiv e impac t o nthi s formof

energy .



### / ^P.1 4

Federa l Register/Vol . 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s 1568 5 V
. Administrativ e Requirement s A. Executive Order

12866, Regulatory Planning and

Review Unde r Executiv e Orde r

1286 6 (5 8 F

R 51735 , Octobe r

4 , 1993) , th e EP A mus t determin e whethe r

th e regulator y actio n i s "significant " and , therefore , subjec t t o revie w b y th e Offic e o f

Managemen t

an d Budge t (OMB ) an dth e requirement s o f th e Executiv e Order
. Th e Executiv e Orde r define s "significan t

regulator y action " a s on e tha t

i s likel y t o resul t

i n arul e tha t

may : (1 ) Hav e a n annua l effec t o n th e econom y o f

$10 0 millio n o r

mor e o r adversel y affec t

i n amateria l wa y th e economy , asecto r

o f th e economy , productivity , competition , jobs , th e environment , publi c healt ho r safety , o r State , local , o r

triba l government s o r communities ; (2 ) Creat e aseriou s inconsistenc y o r otherwis e interfer e wit ha n actio n take n o r planne db y anothe r

agency ; (3 ) Materiall y alte r

th e budgetar y impac t o f entitlements , grants , use r fees , o r loa n programs , o r

th e right s an d obligation s o f

recipient s thereof ; o r (4 ) Rais e nove l lega l o r

polic y issue s arisin g ou t

of lega l mandates , tiie President' s priorities , o r th e principle s se t fort hi n th e Executiv e Order
. Pursuan t t o th e term s o f

Executiv e Orde r 12866 , OM B ha s notifie dEP A tha t i t consider s thi s a"significan t regulator y action " withi n th e meanin g o f th e Executiv e Order
. EP A ha s submitte dthi s actio n t o OM B for review
. Change s mad e i n respons e t o OM B suggestion s o r

recommendation s wil l b e documente di n th e publi c record
. An y writte n comment s from OM B an dwritte n EP A response s ar e availabl e i n th e docke t

(se e ADDRESSE

S sectio n o f

thi s preamble)
. B. Executive Order

13132, Federalism Executiv e Orde r

13132 , entitle d "Federalism " (6 4 F

R43255 , Augus t

10 , 1999) , require s th e EP A t o develo p a n accountabl e proces s t o ensur e "meaningfu l an dtimel y inpu t b y Stat e an dloca l official s i n th e developmen t of regulator y policie s tha t hav e federalis m implications. " "Policie s tha t hav e federalis mimplications " i s define di n th e Executiv e Orde r

t o includ e . regulation s tha t

hav e "substantia l direc t effect s o n th e States , o n th e relationshi p betwee n th e nationa l governmen t an d th e States , o r

o n th e distributio n of powe r an dresponsibilitie s amon g th e variou s level s o f

government. " Unde r Sectio n 6 of

Executiv e Orde r 13132 , th e EP A ma y no t issu e a regulatio n tha t

ha s federalis m implications , tha t

impose s substantia l direc t complianc e costs , an dtha t i s no t require db y statute , unles s th e Federa l

governmen t

provide s th e fund s necessar y t o pa y th e direc t complianc e cost s incurre db y Stat e an dloca l governments , o r

th e EP A consult s wit h Stat e an dloca l official s earl y i nth e proces s o f

developin g th e propose d regulation
. Th e EP A als o ma y no t issu e aregulatio n tha t

ha s federalis m implication s an dtha t

preempt s Stat e la w unles s th e EP A consult s wit hStat e an dloca l official s earl y i n th e proces s o f developin g th e propose dregulation
. Thi s propose drul e doe s no t hav e federalis mimplications
. I t wil l no t hav e substantia l direc t

effect s o nth e States , o n th e relationshi p betwee nth e nationa l governmen t

an dth e States , o r

o nth e distributio no f

powe r an d responsibilitie s amon g th e variou s level s of government , a s specifie di n Executiv e Orde r

13132
. Thus , th e requirement s of

sectio n 6 of

th e Executiv e Orde r

d o no t appl y t o thi s propose drule
. C. Executive Order

13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments Executiv e Orde r

13175 , entitle d "Consultatio nan dCoordinatio n wit h India n Triba l Governments " (6 5 F R 67249 , Novembe r

6 , 2000) , require s EP A t o develo p a naccountabl e proces s t o ensur e "meaningfu l an dtimel y inpu t b y triba l official s i n th e developmen t o f regulator y policie s tha t

hav e triba l implications. " "Policie s tha t hav e triba l implications " i s define di nth e Executiv e Orde r

t o includ e regulation s tha t hav e "substantia l direc t effect s o n on e o r mor e India ntribes , o nth e relationshi p betwee nth e Federa l governmen t

an dth e India ntribes , o r o n th e distributio n o f

powe r an d responsibilitie s betwee n th e Federa l governmen t

an dIndia n tribes. " Thi s propose drul e doe s no t hav e triba l implications
. I t

wil l no t hav e substantia l direc t

effect s o ntriba l governments , o nth e relationshi p betwee n th e Federa l governmen t an d India n tribes , o r

o nth e distributio no f powe r an dresponsibilitie s betwee nth e Federa l governmen t

an dIndia n tribes , a s specifie di nExecutiv e Orde r 13175
. N o triba l government s ar e believe dt o ow n o r operat e a n affecte dsource . Thus , Executiv e Orde r

1317 5 doe s no t

appl y t o thi s rule
. I nth e spiri t of Executiv e Orde r 13175 , an dconsisten t

wit hEP A polic y t o promot e communication s betwee nEP A an dtriba l governments , EP A specificall y solicit s additiona l commen t o nthi s propose drul e from triba l officials
. D. Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and

Safety Risks Executiv e Orde r

1304 5 (6 2 F

R19885 , Apri l 23 , 1997 ) applie s t o an y rul e that : (1 ) I s determine dt o b e "economicall y significant " a s define dunde r Executiv e Orde r 12866 , an d(2 ) concern s a n environmenta l healtl i o r safet y ris k

tiiat th e EP A ha s reaso n t o believ e ma y hav e adisproportionat e effec t o nchildren
. I

f th e regulator y actio nmeet s bot hcriteria , th e EP A mus t

evaluat e th e environmenta l healt ho r safet y effect s of th e planne drul e o nchildren , aii d explai n wh y th e planne dregulatio n i s preferabl e t o othe r

potentiall y effectiv e an dreasonabl y feasibl e alternative s considere db y th e EPA
. Th e EP A interpret s Executiv e Orde r 1304 5 a s applyin g onl y t o tiiose regulator y action s tha t

ar e base do n healt ho r safet y risks , suc htha t

th e analysi s require dunde r sectio n 5-50 1 o f th e Executiv e Orde r

ha s th e potentia l t o influenc e th e regulation
. Thi s propose d rul e i s no t

subjec t t o Executiv e Orde r 1304 5 becaus e i t

i s base do n technolog y performanc e an dno t

o nhealtl i o r

safety risks
. N o children' s ris k analysi s wa s performe dbecaus e n o alternativ e technologie s exis t

tha t woul dprovid e greate r stringenc y a t

areasonabl e cost
. Furthermore , thi s propose drul e ha s bee n determine dno t

t o b e "economicall y significant " a s define d unde r Executiv e Orde r

12866
. E. Executive Order

13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect

Energy Supply, Distribution, or

Use Executiv e Orde r

13211 , "Action s Concernin g Regulation s Tha t Significantl y Affec t

Energ y Supply , Distribution , o r

Use " (6 6 F

R28355 , May 22 , 2001) , require dEP A t o prepar e an d submi t aStatemen t

of Energ y Effect s t o th e Administrato r

o f th e Offic e O

f Informatio nan dRegulator y Affairs , an d th e Offic e o f

Managemen t

an dBudget , for certai n action s identifie da s "significan t

energ y actions. " Sectio n 4(b ) of Executiv e Orde r

1321 1 define s "significan t

energ y actions " a s "an y actio nb y a n agenc y (normall y publishe di nth e Federa l Register ) tha t promulgate s o r

i s expecte dt o lea dt o th e promulgatio no f

afina l rul e o r regulation , includin g notice s of inquiry , advanc e notice s of

propose d rulemaking , an dnotice s o f propose d rulemaking : (1 ) (i ) Tha t

i s asignifican t regulator y actio n unde r Executiv e Orde r 1286 6 o r an y successo r

order , an d(ii ) i s likel y t o hav e asignifican t advers e effec t o nth e supply , distribution , o r us e of energy ; o r

(2 ) tha t i s designate db y th e


# 13.P.1 5



### 1568 6 Federa l Register/Vol . 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s Administrato r

ofth e Offic e o f Informatio n an dRegulator y Affair s a s a significan t

energ y action. " Thi s propose drul e i s no t

a"significan t energ y action " becaus e i t i s no t likel y t o hav e asignifican t

advers e effec t

o n th e supply , distribution , an dus e o f energy . Th e basi s for

thi s determinatio n follows
. Th e reductio n i n petroleu mproduc t output , whic hinclude s reduction s i n fue l production , i s estimate da t onl y 0.00 3 percent , o r

abou t 13 7 barrel s pe r da y base do n 200 0 U.S
. fue l productio n nationwide
. Th e reductio n i n coal , natura l gas , an delectricit y outpu t i s expecte dt o b e negligibl e compare dt o 200 0 U.S
. outpu t

o f thes e product s nationwide
. Th e increas e i n pric e of petroleu mproduct s i s estimate dt o b e onl y 0.00 3 percen t

nationwide
. Whil e energ y distributio n service s suc ha s pipelin e operation s wil l b e directl y affecte db y thi s proposal , energ y distributio n cost s ar e expecte dt o increas e b y onl y 0.3 6 percent
. W e estimat e tha t

ther e wil l b e asligh t increas e o f

onl y 0.00 2 percen t

o f ne t import s (imports—exports) , an dn o othe r advers e outcome s ar e expecte dt o occu r wit hregar dt o energ y supplies
. Give n th e minima l impact s o n energ y supply , distribution , an dus e a s awhol e nationally , n o significan t advers e energ y effect s ar e expecte dt o occur . Fo r mor e informatio n o n thes e estimate denerg y effects , pleas e refe r

t o th e economi c impac t analysi s for

th e propose drule
. Thi s analysi s i s availabl e i n th e publi c docket
. Therefore , w e conclud e tha t thi s propose drul e whe n implemente dwil l no t hav e asignifican t

advers e effec t

o n th e supply , distribution , o r us e o f energy . F. Unfunded

Mandates Reform Act of 1995 Titl e I I o f

th e Unfunde dMandate s Refor mAc t

o f 199 5 (UMRA) , Publi c La w 104—4 , establishe s requirement s for Federa l agencie s t o asses s th e effect s o f thei r regulator y action s o n State , local , an dtriba l government s an dth e privat e sector
. Unde r

sectio n 20 2 o f

th e UMRA , th e EP A generall y mus t prepar e a writte n statement , includin g acost
benefi t analysis , fo r

propose dan dfina l rule s wit h"Federa l mandates " tha t ma y resul t i n expenditure s b y State , local , an dtriba l governments , i n aggregate , o r b y th e privat e sector , o f $10 0 millio n o r mor e i n an y 1 year . Befor e promulgatin g a n EP A rul e for

whic hawritte n statemen t

i s needed , sectio n 20 5 of th e UMR A generall y require s th e EP A t o identif y an dconside r

areasonabl e numbe r o f regulator y alternative s an d adop t th e leas t costly , mos t

cost
effective , o r

leas t burdensom e alternativ e tha t achieve s th e objective s ofth e rule
. Th e provision s of sectio n 20 5 d o no t

appl y whe nthe y ar e inconsisten t

wit happlicabl e law
. Moreover , sectio n20 5 allow s th e EP A t o adop t a nalternativ e othe r

tha n th e leas t costly , mos t

cost-effective , o r

leas t burdensom e alternativ e if th e Administrato r

publishe s wit hth e fina l rul e a n explanatio no f

wh y tha t alternativ e wa s no t

adopted
. Before th e EP A establishe s an y regulator y requirement s tha t

ma y significantl y o r uniquel y affec t

smal l governments , includin g triba l governments , i t mus t hav e develope dunde r

sectio n 20 3 ofth e UMR A asmal l governmen t agenc y plan
. Th e pla n mus t

provid e for

notifyin g potentiall y affecte dsmal l governments , enablin g official s of

affecte dsmal l government s t o hav e meaningfu l an d timel y inpu t

i nth e developmen t

o f EP A regulator y proposal s wit hsignifican t Federa l intergovernmenta l mandates , an dinforming , educating , an dadvisin g smal l government s o n complianc e wit h th e regulator y requirements
. Th e EP A ha s determine dtha t thi s propose drul e doe s no t

contai na Federa l mandat e tha t

ma y resul t

i n expenditure s o f

$10 0 millio n o r

mor e for State , local , an dtriba l governments , i n th e aggregate , o r

th e privat e secto r

i n an y 1 year . Th e maximu mtota l annua l cos t o f thi s propose drul e for

an y yea r ha s bee n estimate dt o b e abou t $41. 4 million
. Thus , today' s propose drul e i s no t subjec t t o th e requirement s of section s 20 2 an d20 5 ofth e UMRA
. I n addition , th e EP A ha s determine dtha t thi s propose drul e contain s n o regulator y requirement s tha t migh t significantl y o r

uniquel y affec t

smal l government s becaus e i t contain s n o requirement s tha t

appl y t o suc h government s o r

impos e obligation s upo nthem
. Therefore , today' s propose d rul e i s no t

subjec t t o th e requirement s o f sectio n 20 3 ofth e UMRA
. G. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) as Amended by the Small

Business Regulatory Enforcement

Fairness Act

of 1996 (SBREFA), 5U.S.C. 601 et seq. Th e RF A generall y require s a nagenc y t o prepar e aregulator y flexibility analysi s o f

an y rul e subjec t

t o notic e an dcommen t

rulemakin g requirement s unde r th e Administrativ e Procedur e Ac t o r an y othe r

statut e unles s th e agenc y certifie s tha t

th e rul e wil l no t

hav e a significan t

economi c impac t

o n a substantia l numbe r

o f smal l entities
. Smal l entitie s includ e smal l businesses , smal l organizations , an dsmal l governmenta l jurisdictions
. Fo r purpose s of

assessin g th e impact s o f today' s propose drul e o n smal l entities , smal l entit y i s define das : (1 ) A smal l busines s whos e paren t compan y ha s fewe r

tha n10 0 o r

1,50 0 employees , dependin g o n siz e definitio nfor th e affecte dNort hAmerica n Industr y Classificatio n Syste m(NAICS ) code , o r amaximu mo f

$ 5 millio nt o $18. 5 millio ni n revenues ; (2 ) asmal l governmenta l jurisdictio n tha t i s a governmen t

of acity , county , town , schoo l distric t

o r specia l distric t

wit ha populatio n o f

les s tha n50,000 ; an d(3 ) asmal l organizatio ntha t i s an y not-for

profi t enterpris e whic hi s independentl y owne dan doperate dan di s no t dominan t

i n it s field. I t

shoul db e note d tha t companie s i n 4 2 NAIC S code s ar e affecte db y thi s propose drule , an dth e smal l busines s definitio napplie dt o eac hindustr y b y NAIC S cod e i s tha t liste di n th e Smal l Busines s Administratio n (SBA ) siz e standard s (1 3 CFR121)
. Fo r

mor e informatio n o n siz e standard s for

particula r

industries , pleas e refe r

t o th e economi c impac t analysi s i nth e docket
. Afte r considerin g th e economi c impact s o f

today' s propose drul e o n smal l entities , I certif

y tha t thi s actio n wil l no t hav e asignifican t

economi c impac t o n asubstantia l numbe r o f smal l entities
. W e hav e determine dtha t ninetee nsmal l firm s i nth e industrie s affecte db y thi s rul e ma y b e affected
. Ou t o f th e ninetee n affecte dsmal l firms, tw o firms ar e estimate dt o hav e complianc e cost s tha t

excee don e percen t o f thei r revenues . I naddition , th e rul e i s likel y t o als o increas e profit s a t

th e man y smal l firms no t affecte db y th e rul e du e t o th e ver y sligh t increas e i n marke t

prices
. Finally , whil e ther e i s adifferenc e betwee nth e media n complianc e cos t t o sale s estimate s for

th e affecte dsmal l an d larg e firm s (0.2 6 percen t compare dt o 0.0 1 percen t

fo r th e larg e firms), n o smal l o r larg e firms ar e expecte dt o clos e i n respons e t o incurrin g th e complianc e cost s associate dwit hthi s rule
. Althoug hthi s propose drul e wil l no t hav e asignifican t

economi c impac t

o n asubstantia l numbe r

o f smal l entities , w e nonetheles s hav e trie dt o minimiz e th e impac t

o f thi s rul e o nsmal l entitie s i n severa l ways . First , w e chos e t o se t th e contro l requirement s a t th e MAC T floor contro l leve l an dno t

a t acontro l leve l mor e stringent
. Thus , th e contro l leve l specifie di nth e propose dOLD rul e i s th e leas t

stringen t

allowe db y th e CAA
. Second , w e hav e se t facilit y size , transfe r rac k throughput , an dtan k

siz e cutoffs i nth e rul e t o minimiz e th e effect s o nsmal l businesses
. Third , w e hav e identifie dalis t

o f 6 9 HA Pfromth e lis t o f 18 8 i n th e CA A t o b e considere d for regulation
. Regulate dliquid s ar e organi c liquid s tha t

contai n a t

leas t 5 

# )HP.1 6
Federa l Register/Vol . 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s 1568 7
percen t b y weigh t

of th e 6 9 HA Plisted
. I n addition , w e worke dwit hvariou s trad e association s durin g th e developmen t

o f th e propose drule
. Thes e action s hav e reduce dth e economi c impac t

o nsmal l entitie s from thi s rule
. W e continu e t o b e intereste d i n th e potentia l impact s ofth e propose d rul e o n smal l entitie s an dwelcom e comment s o n issue s relate dt o suc h impacts
. H. Paperwork

Reduction Act W e wil l submi t

th e informatio n collectio n requirement s i n thi s rul e for approva l t o th e Offic e o f Managemen t an dBudge t

unde r th e Paperwor k Reductio n Act , 4 4 U.S.C
. 350 1 et seq. W e hav e prepare da n Informatio n Collectio n Reques t

(ICR ) documen t

(ICR No
. 1963.01 ) an dyo u ma y obtai nacop y fromSand y Farmer , Offic e o f Environmenta l Information , Collectio n Strategie s Division , U.S
. Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y (2822) , 120 0 Pennsylvani aAvenue , NW , Washington , D C 20460 , b y e-mai l a t farmer.sandy@epa.gov , o r b y callin g (202 ) 260-2740
. A cop y ma y als o b e downloade dof

f th e interne t

(WWW ) a t http://www.epa.gov/icr. Th e informatio n requirement s ar e no t

effectiv e unti l OM B approve s them
. Th e informatio nrequirement s ar e base do n notification , recordkeeping , an dreportin g requirement s i n th e NESHA PGenera l Provision s (4 0 CFR par t 63 , subpar t

A) , whic har e mandator y for

al l operator s subjec t

t o nationa l emissio n standards
. Thes e recordkeepin g an dreportin g requirement s ar e specificall y authorize d b y sectio n 11 4 ofth e CA A (4 2 U.S.C
. 7414)
. Al l informatio n submitte dt o th e EP A pursuan t

t o th e recordkeepin g an d reportin g requirement s for whic ha clai mof confidentialit y i s mad e i s safeguarde daccordin g t o EP A policie s se t fort hi n 4 0 CF Rpar t

2 , subpar t

B
. Th e propose drul e woul drequir e maintenanc e inspection s of th e contro l device s bu t

woul dno t

requir e an y notification s o r

report s beyon dthos e require db y th e Genera l Provisions
. Th e recordkeepin g requirement s requir e onl y th e specifi c informatio n neede dt o determin e compliance
. Th e annua l monitoring , reporting , an d recordkeepin g burde n t o affecte d source s fo r

thi s collectio n (average d ove r th e first 3 year s afte r

th e effectiv e dat e o f th e promulgate drule ) i s estimate dt o b e 242,90 0 labor-hour s pe r year , wit hatota l annua l cos t of $12. 7 millio n pe r

year . Thes e estimate s includ e aone-tim e performanc e tes t an d repor t (wit hrepea t

test s wher e needed) , one-tim e submissio n o f a n SSM Pwit h semiannua l report s for

an y even t

whe n th e procedure s i nth e pla nwer e no t

followed , semiannua l complianc e reports , maintenanc e inspections , notifications , an drecordkeeping
. Burde nmean s th e tota l time , effort , o r financial resource s expende db y person s t o generate , maintain , retain , o r disclos e o r provid e informatio n t o o r for a Federa l agency . Thi s include s th e tim e neede dt o revie w instructions ; develop , acquire , install , an dutiliz e technolog y an dsystem s for

th e purpose s o f collecting , validating , an dverifyin g information , processin g an d maintainin g information , an ddisclosin g an dprovidin g information ; adjus t th e existin g way s t o compl y wit han y previousl y applicabl e instruction s an d requirements ; trai npersonne l t o b e abl e t o respon dt o acollectio n of information ; searc hdat asources ; complet e an drevie w th e collectio n o f information ; an dtransmi t o r otherwis e disclos e th e information
. A n Agenc y ma y no t

conduc t o r sponsor , an daperso n i s no t require dt o respon dto , acollectio nof informatio n unles s i t display s acurrentl y vali dOM B contro l number
. Th e OM B contro l number s fo

r th e EPA' s regulation s ar e liste di n 4 0 CF

Rpar t 9 an d4 8 CF

R chapte r 15
. /
. National

Technology Transfer

and Advancement

Act Unde r sectio n 12(d ) ofth e Nationa l Technolog y Transfe r

an dAdvancemen t Ac t o f 199 5 (NTTAA) , Publi c La w 104

- 113 , al l Federa l agencie s ar e require dt o us e voluntar y consensu s standard s (VCS ) i nthei r

regulator y an d procuremen t

activitie s unles s t o d o s o woul db e inconsisten t

wit happlicabl e la w o r otherwis e impractical
. Voluntar y consensu s standard s ar e technica l standard s (e.g. , material s specifications , tes t methods , samplin g procedures , busines s practices ) develope do r adopte db y on e o r

mor e voluntar y consensu s bodies
. Th e NTTA A require s Federa l agencie s t o provid e Congress , throug hannua l report s t o OMB , wit h explanation s whe n a n agenc y doe s no t us e availabl e an dapplicabl e VCS
. Consisten t

wit hth e NTTAA , th e EP A conducte dsearche s t o identif y VC S for us e i n emission s monitoring
. Thi s searc hi s describe di namemorandu m whic hi s i nth e docket
. Th e searc hfor emission s monitorin g procedure s identifie d1 9 VC S tha t

appeare dt o hav e possibl e us e i nlie u of

EP A standar d referenc e methods
. However , afte r reviewin g th e availabl e VCS , th e EP A determine dtha t

nin e o f th e candidat e VC S identifie dfor

measurin g emission s of th e HA Po r

surrogate s subjec t

t o emissio n standard s i n th e propose drul e woul dno t

b e practica l du e t o lac k of equivalency , documentation , an d validatio n data
. Te n o f

th e remainin g candidat e VC S ar e unde r developmen t o r unde r EP A review
. Th e EP A plan s t o follow , review , an dconside r adoptin g thes e VC S afte r

thei r developmen t

an d furthe r revie w b y th e EP A i s completed
. Tw o VCS , AST M D2879-83 , Standar d Tes t Metho dfor

Vapo r Pressure — Temperatur e Relationshi p an dInitia l Decompositio n Temperatur e o f Liquid s b y Isoteniscope ; an dAP I Publicatio n 2517 , Evaporativ e Los s fromExterna l Floating-Roo f

Tanks , Thir dEdition , Februar y 1989 , wer e alread y incorporate db y referenc e i n4 0 CF R 63.1 4 an dar e als o bein g use di n tiiis propose drule
. Th e AST M D6420-9 9 i s currentl y unde r EP A revie w a s a napprove d alternativ e t o Metho d18
. Th e EPA wil l als o compar e thi s fina l AST M standar d t o method s previousl y approve da s alternative s t o EP A Metiio d1 8 wit h specifi c applicabilit y limitations
. Thes e methods , designate da s ALT-01 7 an d CTM-028 , ar e availabl e throug hth e EPA' s Emissio n Measuremen t Cente r interne t sit e a t www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/ tmethods.html. Th e final AST M D6420

- 9 9 standar di s ver y simila r t o tiiese approve dalternativ e metiiods , whic h ma y b e equall y suitabl e for specifi c applications
. W e pla n t o continu e ou r revie w ofth e fina l standar dan dwil l conside r adoptin g th e AST M standar dat alate r date
. Th e EP A i s requestin g commen t o n th e complianc e demonstratio n requirement s bein g propose di n tiiis propose drul e an dspecificall y invite s th e publi c t o identif

y potentially

applicabl e VCS
. Commenter s shoul d als o explai n wh y thi s propose drul e shoul dadop t

thes e VC S i nlie u of

th e EPA' s standards
. Emissio n tes t method s an dperformanc e specification s submitte dfo

r evaluatio n shoul db e accompanie db y abasi s fo r th e recommendation , includin g metho d validatio ndat aan dth e procedur e use d t o validat e th e candidat e metho d(if a metho dothe r

tha nMetho d301 , 4 0 CF R par t 63 , appendi x A wa s used)
. Sectio n63.240 6 an dTabl e 5 ofth e propose dsubpar t

lis t th e EP A testin g metiiod s an dperformanc e standard s include di n th e propose drule
. Mos t of th e standard s hav e bee n use db y State s an dindustr y for

mor e tha n 1 0 years . Nevertheless , unde r

§ 63.7(f ) of subpar t A of 4 0 CF Rpar t 63 , th e proposa l als o allow s an y Stat e o r

sourc e t o appl y t o th e EP A for

permissio n t o us e a n alternativ e metho di n plac e o f an y of th e EP A testin g method s o r performanc e standard s liste di npropose dsubpar t EEEE
. 

# rP.1 7

1568 8 Federa l Register/Vol . 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s Lis to f Subject s i n 4 0 CF

RPar t6 3 Environmenta l protection , Administrativ e practic e an dprocedure , Ai r pollutio n control , Hazardou s substances , Intergovernmenta l relations , Reportin g an drecordkeepin g requirements
. Dated : Marc h19 , 2002
. Christin e Tod dWhitman , Administrator. Fo r th e reason s state di n th e preamble , titl e 40 , chapte r I , par t 6 3 o f th e Cod e o f

Federa l Regulation s i s propose dt o b e amende da s follows : PAR T63—[AMENDED ] 1
. Th e authorit y citatio n for par t 6 3 continue s t o rea da s follows : Authority : 42 U.S.C
. 7401 , et seq. 2
. Sectio n 63.1 4 i s amende db y revisin g paragraph s (b)(3 ) an d(c)(1 ) t o rea da s follows : § 63.1 4 Incorporatio n b y reference . **** * (b ) * * * (3 ) AST M D2879-83 , Standar dTes t Metiio dfor

Vapo r Pressure-Temperatur e Relationshi p an dInitia l Decompositio n Temperatur e o f

Liquid s b y Isoteniscope , IB Rapprove dfo r

§ 63.11 1 o f

subpar t G of thi s par t an dfo r § 63.240 6 o f

subpar t EEE Eo f thi s part
. (c ) * * * (1 ) AP I Publicatio n2517 , Evaporativ e Los s fromExterna l Floating-Roo f Tanks , Thir dEdition , Februar y 1989 , IB R approve dfor

§ 63.11 1 of

subpar t Gof thi s par t an dfor § 63.240 6 o f

subpar t EEE Eof thi s part
. **** * 3
. Par t 6 3 i s amende db y addin g subpar t EEEEt o rea da s follows : Subpar t EEEE—Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo r Hazardou s Ai r Pollutants : Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (non-Gasoline ) Sec . Wha t Thi s Subpart

Cover s 63.233 0 Wha

t i s th e purpos e o

f thi s subpart ? 63.233 4 A

mI subjec t

to thi s subpart ? 63.233 8 Wha

t part s o f my plan t doe s thi s subpart cover ? 63.234 2 When do I hav e to comply wit h thi s subpart ? Emissio n Limitation s an dWor k Practic e Standard s 63.234 6 Wha

t emissio nlimitation s an d wor k practic e standard s mus t

I meet ? Genera l Complianc e Requirement s 63.235 0 Wha

t ar e m y genera l requirement s fo r complyin g withthi s subpart ? Testin g an dInitia l Complianc e Requirement s 63.235 4 By wha

t date mus t I conduc t performanc e test s o

r other initial complianc e demonstrations ? 63.235 8 Whe

nmus t I conduc t subsequen t performanc e tests ? 63.236 2 Wha

t performanc e tests , desig n evaluations , an dperformanc e evaluation s mus t

I conduct ? 63.236 6 Wha

t ar e m y monitorin g installation , operation , an dmaintenanc e requirements ? 63.237 0 Ho

w do I demonstrate initia l complianc e wit

hth e emissio n limitation s an dwor

k practic e standards ? Continuou s Complianc e Requirement s 63.237 4 Ho

w d o I monito r

an dcollec t

dat a t o demonstrate continuou s compliance ? 63.237 8 Ho

w d o I demonstrate continuou s complianc e wit

hth e emissio n limitation s an dwor

k practic e standards ? Notifications , Reports , and Record s 63.238 2 Wha

t notification s mus t

I submi t an dwhen ? 63.238 6 Wha

t report s mus t

I submi t an d when ? 63.239 0 Wha

t record s mus t

I keep ? 63.2394 I

n wha t for man dho w long mus t

I keep m y records ? Other Requirement s an dInfonnatio n 63.239 8 Wha

t part s o f th e Genera

l Provision s apply to me ? 63.2402 Wh

o implement s an denforce s thi s subpart ? 63.240 6 Wha

t definition s appl y to thi s subpart ? 63.2407-242 9 [Reserved] Table s t o Subpart

EEE Eo f Part 6 3 Tabl e 1 t o Subpar

t EEE Eo f Par t 63—Organic Hazardou s Ai

r Pollutant s Tabl e 2 to Subpar

t EEE Eo f Par t 63 — Emissio nLimit s Tabl e 3 t o Subpar

t EEE Eo f Part 63 — Operatin g Limit s Tabl e 4 t o Subpar

t EEE Eo f Par t 63—Wor k Practic e Standard s Tabl e 5 t o Subpar

t EEE Eo f Par t 63 — Requirement s fo

r Performanc e Test s Tabl e 6 t o Subpar

t EEE Eo f Par t 63—Initia

l Complianc e wit

hEmissio nLimit s Tabl e 7 t o Subpar

t EEE Eo f Par t 63—Initia

l Complianc e wit

hWor k Practic e Standard s Tabl e 8 t o Subpar

t EEE Eo f Par t 63 — Continuou s Complianc e wit hEmissio n Limit s Tabl e 9 t o Subpar

t EEE Eo f Par t 63 — Continuou s Complianc e wit hOperatin g Limit s Table 1 0 to Subpar

t EEE Eo f Par t 63 — Continuou s Complianc e wit hWor k Practic e Standard s Tabl e 1 1 to Subpar

t EEE Eo f Par t 63 — Requirement s fo

r Report s Tabl e 1 2 t o Subpar

t EEE Eo f Par t 63 — Applicabilit

y o f Genera l Provision s to Subpar t EEE E Wha tThi s Subpar tCover s § 63.233 0 What I s th e purpos e ofthi s subpart ? Thi s subpar t

establishe s nationa l emissio n limitation s an dwor k practic e standard s for

hazardou s ai r

pollutant s (HAP ) emitte dfromorgani c liquid s distributio n (OLD ) (non-gasoline ) operations
. Thi s subpar t als o establishe s requirement s t o demonstrat e initia l an d continuou s complianc e wit hth e emissio n limitation s an dwor k practic e standards
. § 63.233 4 A m I subject t o thi s subpart ? (a) Yo u ar e subjec t

t o thi s subpar t

if yo u ow no r

operat e a nOLD operatio n tha t i s locate da t

o r i s par t o f amajo r sourc e of hazardou s ai r

pollutan t emissions
. (b ) You r OLD operatio nmus t

hav e a tota l organi c liquid s throughpu t o f 27. 6 millio n liter s (7.2 9 millio n gallons ) pe r yea r o r mor e eithe r

int o o r ou t o f th e operatio n t o b e subjec t

t o th e contro l provision s o f

thi s subpart
. Organi c liquid s ar e al l crud e oil s othe r tha n blac k oil , an dthos e liquid s o r liqui d mixtures , excep t

gasoline , tha t

contai na tota l o f 5 percen t

b y weigh t

o r mor e of th e organi c HA Pliste di nTabl e 1 of thi s subpart
. (1 ) A nOLD operatio ni s th e combinatio no f

activitie s an dequipmen t use dt o transfe r

organi c liquid s int o o r ou t o f aplan t sit e o r t o stor e organi c liquid s o n th e plan t

site
. Gasoline , a s wel l a s an y fuel s tha t

ar e consume do r dispense do nth e plan t

sit e directl y t o user s (suc ha s fuel s use dfor flee t refueling ) ar e no t

considere dorgani c liquid s i n thi s subpart
. (2 ) A majo r

sourc e of

HA Pi s aplan t sit e tha t emit s o r ha s th e potentia l t o emi t an y singl e HA Pa t

arat e o f 9.0 7 megagram s (1 0 tons ) o r

mor e pe r

year , o r an y combinatio n o f

HA Pa t arat e of 22.6 8 megagram s (2 5 tons ) o r mor e pe r year . (c ) Thi s subpar t

covers : (1 ) Organi c liquid s distributio n operation s tha t

occup y a n entir e plan t site ; an d (2 ) Organi c liquid s distributio n operation s tha t

ar e collocate dwit hotiie r industria l (e.g. , manufacturing ) operation s a t

th e sam e plan t

site
. § 63.233 8 What part s of m y plan t doe s thi s subpar t cover ? (a) Thi s subpar t

applie s t o eac hnew , reconstructed , o r

existin g OLD operatio n affecte dsource . (b)(1 ) Th e affecte dsourc e i s eac h entir e OLD operatio na t aplan t sit e i n an y industria l category , excep t for thos e emissio nsource s tha t

ar e controlle d unde r th e provision s of

anothe r 4 0 CF R 

# nP.1 8

Federa l Register/Vol . 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s 1568 9
par t 6 3 nationa l emissio n standard s for hazardou s ai r

pollutant s regulation
. Th e mai n type s o f

plan t site s tha t

eithe r ar e i n themselve s a n OL D operatio n o r contai n acollocate dOL D operatio n are : (i ) Liqui dtermina l facilitie s tha t distribut e eithe r

organi c liquid s tha t the y own , o r

organi c liquid s owne db y other s o n afor-hir e basis , o r a combinatio n o f

both ; (ii ) Organi c chemica l manufacturin g facilities , petroleu mrefineries , an d othe r industria l facilitie s tha t hav e a collocate dOLD operation ; an d (iii ) Crud e oi l pipelin e pumpin g station s an dbreakou t

stations
. (2 ) Th e followin g emissio nsource s withi n OL D operation s constitut e th e affecte dsource : Storag e tank s storin g organi c liquid s an dmeetin g th e tan k siz e an dliqui dvapo r

pressur e cutoffs i n Tabl e 2 o f

thi s subpart ; transfe r

rac k loadin g position s a t

whic horgani c liquid s ar e loade dint o carg o tank s (tan k truck s o r railcars ) a t

o r abov e th e minimu mthroughpu t

show n i n Tabl e 2 o f thi s subpart ; an dequipmen t (pumps , valves , etc. ) i n organi c liquid s servic e fo r a t leas t 30 0 hour s pe r

year . I n addition , vapo r

leakag e point s o ncarg o tank s whil e loadin g organi c liquid s a t affecte dtransfe r

rack s ar e considere d par t ofth e affecte dsource . (c ) Th e provision s o f

thi s subpar t

d o no t appl y t o researc han ddevelopmen t facilities , consisten t

wit hsectio n 112(b)(7 ) ofth e Clea nAi r Ac t (CAA)
. (d ) A n affecte dsourc e i s ane w affecte dsourc e i f

yo u commence d constructio n o f

th e affecte dsourc e afte r Apri l 2 , 2002 , an dyo u mee t th e applicabilit y criteri ai n § 63.233 4 a t th e tim e yo u commence doperation
. (e ) A n affecte dsourc e i s reconstructe d i f yo u mee t

th e criteri afo r reconstructio n a s define di n § 63.2
. (f ) A n affecte dsourc e i s existin g if i t i s no t ne w o r reconstructed
. § 63.234 2 Whe n d o I have t o compl y wit h thi s subpart ? (a) If yo u hav e ane w o r

reconstructe d affecte dsource , yo u mus t compl y wit h thi s subpar t

accordin g t o th e guidanc e i n paragraph s (a)(1 ) an d(2 ) of thi s section : (1 ) I f yo u startu p you r

affecte dsourc e befor e [th e effectiv e dat e o f thi s subpart] , yo u mus t

compl y wit hth e emissio n limitation s an dwor k practic e standard s fo r

ne w an dreconstructe d source s i n thi s subpar t

n o late r tha n[th e effectiv e dat e o f

thi s subpart] , (2 ) If yo u startu p you r

affecte dsourc e afte r [th e effectiv e dat e o f

thi s subpart] , yo u mus t compl y wit hth e emissio n limitation s an dwor k

practic e standard s for ne w an dreconstructe dsource s i n thi s subpar t upo nstartu p o f

you r affecte dsource . (b ) I f yo u hav e a n existin g affecte d source , yo u mus t

compl y wit hth e emissio nlimitation s an dwor k practic e standard s for

existin g source s n o late r tha n [ 3 year s afte r

th e effectiv e dat e of th e fina l rule]
. (c ) I f yo u hav e a n are asourc e tha t increase s it s emission s o r it s potentia l t o emi t suc htha t

i t become s amajo r

sourc e o f HAP , th e guidanc e i nparagraph s (c)(1 ) an d(2 ) o f

thi s sectio napplies : (1 ) An y portio nofth e existin g facilit y tha t i s ane w affecte dsourc e o r ane w reconstructe dsourc e mus t b e i n complianc e wit hthi s subpar t upo n startup
. (2 ) Al l othe r

part s of th e sourc e mus t b e i n complianc e wit hthi s subpar t n o late r tha n3 year s afte r

i t become s a majo r source . (d ) Yo u mus t

mee t th e notificatio n requirement s i n § 63.2382(a ) accordin g t o th e schedul e i n § 63.2382(b) , (c) , (d) , an d(e ) an di n subpar t

A of thi s part
. Som e o f th e notification s mus t

b e submitte dbefor e yo u ar e require dt o compl y wit hth e emissio n limitation s an dwor k practic e standard s i nthi s subpart
. Emissio n Limitation s an dWor k Practic e Standard s § 63.234 6 What emissio n limitation s an d wor k practic e standard s must I meet ? (a) Yo u mus t

mee t eac hemissio n limi t i n Tabl e 2 o f

thi s subpar t

tha t applie s t o you . (b ) Yo u mus t

mee t eac hoperatin g limi t i n Tabl e 3 o f

thi s subpar t

tha t applie s t o you . (c ) Yo u mus t

mee t eac hwor k

practic e standar di nTabl e 4 of

thi s subpar t

tha t applie s t o you . (d ) A s provide di n § 63.6(g) , yo u ma y reques t approva l fromth e EP A t o us e a n alternativ e t o th e wor k

practic e standard s i nthi s section
. If yo u appl y for permissio n t o us e a nalternativ e t o th e wor k practic e standard s i nthi s section , yo u mus t

submi t th e informatio ndescribe di n§ 63.6(g)(2)
. Genera l Complianc e Requirement s § 63.235 0 What are my genera l requirement s fo r complyin g wit h thi s subpart ? (a) Yo u mus t

b e i ncomplianc e wit h th e emissio nlimitation s an dwor k practic e standard s i n thi s subpar t at al l times , excep t

durin g period s of

startup , shutdown , o r

malfunction
. (b ) Yo u mus t

alway s operat e an d maintai n you r

affecte dsource , includin g ai r pollutio n contro l an dmonitorin g equipment , accordin g t o th e provision s in§63.6(e)(l)(i)
. (c ) Yo u mus t develo p an dimplemen t awritte nstartup , shutdown , an d malfunctio npla n(SSMP ) accordin g t o th e provision s i n§ 63.6(e)(3)
. Testin g an d Initia l Complianc e Requirement s § 63.235 4 By what dat e mus t I conduc t performanc e test s o r othe r Initia l complianc e demonstrations ? (a) Fo r existin g sources , yo u mus t conduc t initia l performanc e test s an d othe r initia l complianc e demonstration s n o late r tha nth e complianc e dat e specifie di n § 63.2342(b)
. (b ) Fo r ne w sources , yo u mus t conduc t initia l performanc e test s an d othe r initia l complianc e demonstration s accordin g t o th e provision s i n §63.7(a)(2)(i)and(ii)
. § 63.235 8 Whe n mus t I conduc t subsequen t performanc e tests ? (a) Fo r carg o tank s equippe dwit h vapo r collectio n equipmen t

tha t loa d organi c liquid s a t

affecte dtransfe r

rac k loadin g positions , yo u mus t perfor mth e vapo r tightnes s testin g require di nTabl e 5 o f thi s subpar t

o neac hcarg o tan k

tha t yo u ow n o r

operat e a t

leas t onc e pe r year . (b ) Fo r nonflar e contro l devices , yo u mus t conduc t th e performanc e testin g require di nTabl e 5 o f

thi s subpar t

a t an y tim e th e EP A request s yo u t o i n accordanc e wit hsectio n11 4 ofth e CAA
. § 63.236 2 What performanc e tests , desig n evaluations , an d performanc e evaluation s must I conduct ? (a) Yo u mus t

conduc t eac h performanc e tes t

i nTabl e 5 o f

thi s subpar t tha t applie s t o you . (b ) Yo u mus t

conduc t eac h performanc e tes t

accordin g t o th e requirement s i n § 63.7(e)(1) , usin g th e procedure s specifie di n§ 63.997(e)
. (c ) Yo u mus t

conduc t thre e separat e tes t run s for eac hperformanc e tes t

o n a nonflar e contro l device , a s specifie di n § 63.7(e)(3)
. Eac htes t

ru n mus t

las t a t leas t 1 hour
. (d ) I nadditio n t o Metho d2 5 o r 25 A of 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , appendi x A , t o determin e complianc e wit hth e organi c HA Po r tota l organi c compound s (TOC ) emissio nlimit , yo u ma y us e Metho d1 8 o f 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , appendi x A
. I

f yo u us e Metho d1 8 t o measur e complianc e wit hth e percentag e efficienc y limit , yo u mus t firs t determin e whic hHA Par e presen t i nth e inle t

ga s strea m(i.e. , uncontrolle demissions ) usin g knowledg e o f

th e organi c liquid s o r

th e screenin g procedur e describe di n Metiio d18
. I nconductin g th e performanc e test , yo u mus t analyz e sample s collecte da s specifie di n 

# ISP.1 9



### 1569 0 Federa l Register/Vol . 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s Metho d18 , simultaneousl y a t th e inle t an doutle t

ofth e contro l device
. Quantif y th e emission s for

al l HA P identifie da s presen t

i nth e inle t

ga s strea mfor

bot hth e inle t

an doutie t

ga s stream s o f

th e contro l device
. (e ) If yo u us e Metho d1 8 of

4 0 CF R par t 60 , appendi x A , t o measur e complianc e wit hth e emissio n concentratio n limit , yo u mus t first determin e whic hHA Par e presen t i n th e inle t ga s strea musin g knowledg e o f th e organi c liquid s o r

th e screenin g procedur e describe di n Metho d18
. I n conductin g th e performanc e test , analyz e sample s collecte da s specifie d i n Metho d1 8 a t

th e outle t

ofth e contro l device
. Quantif

y th e contro l devic e outle t emissio n concentratio n for th e sam e HA Pidentifie da s presen t i n th e inle t o r uncontrolle dga s stream
. (f ) I f aprincipa l componen t of th e uncontrolle do r

inle t ga s strea mt o th e contro l devic e i s formaldehyde , yo u ma y us e Metho d31 6 o f appendi x A o f thi s par t instea dof

Metho d1 8 o f

4 0 CF R par t 60 , appendi x A , for

measurin g th e formaldehyde
. I

f formaldehyd e i s th e predominan t

HA Pi n th e inle t

ga s stream , yo u ma y us e Metho d31 6 alon e t o measur e formaldehyd e eithe r a t th e inle t an doutle t

o f th e contro l devic e usin g th e formaldehyd e contro l efficienc y a s asurrogat e for tota l organi c HA Po r TO C efficiency , o r

a t th e outie t o f acombustio n devic e for determinin g complianc e wit hth e emissio n concentratio n limit
. (g ) Yo u mus t

conduc t eac hdesig n evaluatio n o f

acontro l devic e accordin g t o th e requirement s i n § 63.985(b)(l)(i)
. (h ) Yo u ma y no t

conduc t performanc e test s durin g period s o f

startup , shutdown , o r

malfunction , a s specifie d i n §63.7(e)(1)
. (i ) Yo u mus t

conduc t eac hcontinuou s monitorin g syste m(CMS ) performanc e evaluatio n accordin g t o th e requirement s i n § 63.8(e)
. § 63.236 6 Wha t are my monitorin g Installation , operation , an d maintenanc e requirements ? (a) Yo u mus t

install , operate , an d maintai n eac hcontinuou s paramete r monitorin g syste m(CPMS ) accordin g t o th e requirement s i n§ 63.996
. I n addition , yo u mus t

collec t an danalyz e temperature , flow , pressure , o r p H dat a accordin g t o th e requirement s i n paragraph s (a)(1 ) throug h(4 ) o f thi s section : (1 ) T o calculat e avali dhourl y value , yo u mus t hav e a t leas t fou r equall y space ddat avalue s (o r

at leas t two , i f tha t conditio n i s include dt o allo w for periodi c calibratio n checks ) for tha t hou r from aCM S tha t

i s no t ou t o f contro l accordin g t o th e monitorin g pla n (e.g. , on e tha t incorporate s element s of appendi x F , procedur e 1 o f 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , appendi x F)
. (2 ) T o calculat e th e averag e emission s for eac haveragin g period , yo u mus t hav e a t leas t 7 5 percen t

of th e hourl y average s for

tha t perio dusin g onl y bloc k hourl y averag e value s tha t ar e base do n vali ddat a(i.e. , no t

fromout-of-contro l periods)
. (3 ) Determin e th e hourl y averag e of al l recorde dreadings
. (4 ) Recor dth e result s o f eac h inspection , calibration , an dvalidatio n check
. (b ) Fo r eac htemperatur e monitorin g device , yo u mus t

mee t th e requirement s i n paragraph s (a)(1 ) throug h(4 ) an d paragraph s (b)(1 ) throug h(8 ) o f thi s section : (1 ) Locat e th e temperatur e senso r i n a positio ntha t

provide s arepresentativ e temperature
. (2 ) Fo r anoncryogeni c temperatur e range , us e atemperatur e senso r wit ha minimu mtoleranc e of

2. 2 degree s Celsiu s o r

0.7 5 percen t

ofth e temperatur e value , whicheve r i s greater
. (3 ) Fo r acryogeni c temperatur e range , us e atemperatur e senso r wit ha minimu mtoleranc e o f

2. 2 degree s Celsiu s o r

2 percen t

of th e temperatur e value , whicheve r

i s greater
. (4 ) Shiel dth e temperatur e senso r syste mfromelectromagneti c interferenc e an dchemica l contaminants
. (5 ) I f achar t recorde r i s used , i t

mus t hav e asensitivit y i n th e mino r divisio n o f a t leas t 2 0 degree s Fahrenheit
. (6 ) Perfor ma nelectroni c calibratio n a t leas t semiannuall y accordin g t o th e procedure s i n th e manufacturer' s owner' s manual
. Followin g th e electroni c calibration , yo u mus t conduc t atemperatur e senso r

validatio nchec k

i n whic hasecon do r

redundan t temperatur e senso r

place dnea r

th e proces s temperatur e senso r mus t yiel da readin g withi n16. 7 degree s Celsiu s of th e proces s temperatur e sensor' s reading
. (7 ) Conduc t

calibratio nan dvalidatio n check s an y time th e senso r exceed s th e manufacturer' s specifie dmaximu m operatin g temperatur e range , o r instal l a ne w temperatur e sensor . (8 ) A t leas t monthly , inspec t

al l component s for

integrit y an dal l electrica l connection s for continuity , oxidation , an dgalvani c corrosion
. (c ) Fo r eac hflo w measuremen t device , yo u mus t

mee t th e requirement s i n paragraph s (a)(1 ) throug h(4 ) an d paragraph s (c)(1 ) throug h(5 ) o f thi s section : (1 ) Locat e th e flow senso r an dothe r necessar y equipmen t

suc ha s straightenin g vane s i n apositio ntha t

provide s arepresentativ e flow
. (2 ) Us e aflo w senso r

wit haminimu m toleranc e o f

2 percen t

ofth e flow rate
. (3 ) Reduc e swirlin g flo w o r abnorma l velocit y distribution s du e t o upstrea m an ddownstrea mdisturbances
. (4 ) Conduc t

aflow senso r

calibratio n chec k a t leas t semiannually
. (5 ) A t leas t monthly , inspec t

al l component s for

integrity , al l electrica l connection s for

continuity , an dal l mechanica l connection s for leakage
. (d ) Fo r eac hpressur e measuremen t device , yo u mus t

mee t tiie requirement s i n paragraph s (a)(1 ) throug h(4 ) an d paragraph s (d)(1 ) throug h(7 ) of thi s section : (1 ) Locat e th e pressur e sensot(s ) i na positio n tha t

provide s arepresentativ e measuremen t

ofth e pressure . (2 ) Minimiz e o r

eliminat e pulsatin g pressure , vibration , an dinterna l an d externa l corrosion
. (3 ) Us e agaug e wit haminimu m toleranc e of

0. 5 inc ho f

wate r o r a transduce r

wit haminimu mtoleranc e of 1 percen t o f th e pressur e range . (4 ) Chec k for pressur e ta p pluggag e daily
. (5 ) Usin g amanometer , chec k gaug e calibratio n quarterl y an dtransduce r calibratio n monthly
. (6 ) Conduc t

calibratio ncheck s an y tim e th e senso r

exceed s tiie manufacturer' s specifie dmaximu m operatin g pressur e range , o r instal l a ne w pressur e sensor . (7 ) A t leas t monthly , inspec t

al l component s for

integrity , al l electrica l connection s for

continuity , an dal l mechanica l connection s for leakage
. (e ) Fo r eac hp H measuremen t

device , yo u mus t mee t th e requirement s i n paragraph s (a)(1 ) throug h(4 ) an d paragraph s (e)(1 ) throug h(4 ) o f thi s section : (1 ) Locat e th e p H senso r i napositio n tha t provide s arepresentativ e measuremen t

o f pH
. (2 ) Ensur e tha t

th e sampl e i s properl y mixe dan drepresentativ e ofth e flui dt o b e measured
. (3 ) Chec k th e p H meter' s calibratio n o na t leas t tw o point s ever y 8 hour s of proces s operation
. (4 ) A t leas t monthly , inspec t

al l component s for

integrit y an dal l electrica l connection s fo r continuity
. § 63.237 0 Ho

wd o I demonstrat e Initia l complianc e wit h th e emissio n limitation s an d wor k

practic e standards ? (a ) Yo u mus t

demonstrat e initia l complianc e wit heac hemissio n limi t an dwor k practic e standar dtha t

applie s t o yo u accordin g t o Table s 6 an d7 of thi s subpart
. (b ) Yo u mus t

establis heac hsite

specifi c operatin g limi t

i n Tabl e 3 of


# /< ?P.2 0

Federa l Register/Vol . 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s 1569 1 thi s subpar t

tha t applie s t o yo u accordin g t o th e requirement s i n § 63.236 2 an dTabl e 5 o f thi s subpart
. (c ) Yo u mus t

submi t th e Notificatio n o f Complianc e Statu s containin g th e result s o f th e initia l complianc e demonstratio n accordin g t o th e requirement s i n § 63.2382(e)
. Continuou s Complianc e Requirement s § 63.237 4 Howd o I monito r an d collec t dat a t o demonstrat e continuou s compliance ? (a) Yo u mus t

monito r an dcollec t

dat a accordin g t o thi s section
. (b ) Excep t

fo r monito r malfunctions , associate drepairs , an drequire dqualit y assuranc e o r

contro l activitie s (including , a s applicable , calibratio n check s an drequire dzer o an dspa n adjustments) , yo u mus t monito r continuousl y (o r

collec t dat aa t al l require dintervals ) a t

al l times tha t

th e affecte dsourc e i s operating
. (c ) Yo u ma y no t

us e dat arecorde d durin g monitorin g malfunctions , associate drepairs , o r

require dqualit y assuranc e o r

contro l activitie s i n dat a average s an dcalculation s use dt o repor t emissio n o r

operatin g levels , no r

ma y suc hdat ab e use di n fulfillin g a minimu mdat aavailabilit y requirement , i f applicable
. Yo u mus t

us e al l o f

th e dat acollecte ddurin g al l othe r period s i n assessin g th e operatio n o f th e contro l devic e an dassociate dcontro l system
. § 63.237 8 Ho

wd o I demonstrat e continuou s complianc e wit h th e emissio n limitation s an d wor k

practic e standards ? (a) Yo u mus t

demonstrat e continuou s complianc e wit heac hemissio n limitatio n an dwor k

practic e standar di n Table s 2 throug h4 o f

thi s subpar t

tha t applie s t o yo u accordin g t o th e method s specifie di n Table s 8 , 9 , an d1 0 o f thi s subpart
. (b ) Yo u mus t

repor t eac hinstanc e i n whic hyo u di dno t

mee t an y emissio n limi t o r operatin g limi t

i n Table s 8 an d 9 o f thi s subpar t

tha t applie s t o you . Thi s include s period s o f startup , shutdown , o r

malfunction
. Yo u mus t als o repor t

eac hinstanc e i n whic hyo u di dno t mee t th e requirement s i nTabl e 1 0 o f thi s subpar t

tha t appl y t o you . Thes e instance s ar e deviation s fromth e emissio n limitation s an dwor k practic e standard s i n thi s subpart
. Thes e deviation s mus t

b e reporte daccordin g t o th e requirement s i n § 63.2386
. (c ) Durin g period s o f

startup , shutdown , o r

malfunction , yo u mus t operat e i n accordanc e wit hyou r SSMP
. (d ) Consisten t

wit h§ § 63.6(e ) an d 63.7(e)(1) , deviation s tha t occu r durin g aperio dof

startup , shutdown , o r malfunctio n ar e no t

violation s if

yo u mak e a n adequat e demonstratio n tha t yo u wer e operatin g i naccordanc e wit h th e SSMP
. W e wil l determin e whethe r deviation s tha t

occu r durin g aperio do f startup , shutdown , o r

malfunctio n ar e violation s accordin g t o th e provision s i n § 63.6(e)
. Notifications , Reports , an d Record s § 63.238 2 What notification s must I submi t an d when ? (a) Yo u mus t

submi t al l of th e notification s i n§ § 63.7(b ) an d(c) , 63.8(e) , (f)(4 ) an d(6) , an d63.9(b ) throug h(h ) tha t

appl y t o you . (b ) A s specifie di n§ 63.9(b)(2) , i f yo u startu p you r

affecte dsourc e befor e [th e effectiv e dat e o f

thi s subpart] , yo u mus t submi t a n Initia l Notificatio nn o late r tha n12 0 calenda r

day s afte r

[th e effectiv e dat e o f

thi s subpart]
. (c ) A s specifie di n § 63.9(b)(3) , if yo u startu p you r

ne w o r reconstructe d affecte dsourc e o no r

after [th e effectiv e date] , yo u mus t

submi t a nInitia l Notificatio nn o late r

tha n 12 0 day s afte r initia l startup
. (d ) If yo u ar e require dt o conduc t a performanc e test , yo u mus t submi t a notificatio no f

inten t t o conduc t

th e tes t a t leas t 6 0 calenda r

day s befor e i t

i s schedule dt o begi n a s require di n § 63.7(b)(1)
. (e ) If yo u ar e require dt o conduc t a performanc e tes t

o r othe r initia l complianc e demonstratio na s specifie d i n Tabl e 5 , 6 , o r

7 o f thi s subpart , yo u mus t submi t aNotificatio n of Complianc e Statu s accordin g t o § 63.9(h)(2)(h)
. (1 ) Fo r eac hinitia l complianc e demonstratio nrequire di n Tabl e 5 , 6 , o r 7 o f thi s subpar t

tha t doe s no t includ e aperformanc e test , yo u mus t submi t th e Notificatio n o f

Complianc e Statu s befor e th e clos e o f

busines s o nth e 30t h calenda r da y followin g th e completio n o f th e initia l complianc e demonstration
. (2 ) Fo r eac hinitia l complianc e demonstratio nrequire di n Tabl e 5 , 6 , o r 7 o f thi s subpar t

tha t include s a performanc e tes t

conducte daccordin g t o th e requirement s i nTabl e 5 of thi s subpart , yo u mus t

submi t th e Notificatio n o f

Complianc e Status , includin g th e performanc e tes t results , befor e th e clos e o f

busines s o n th e 60t h calenda r da y followin g th e completio n of th e performanc e tes t

accordin g t o § 63.10(d)(2)
. § 63.238 6 What report s must I submi t an d when ? (a) Yo u mus t

submi t eac hrepor t

i n Tabl e 1 1 of

thi s subpar t

tha t applie s t o you . (b ) Unles s th e Administrato r ha s approve dadifferen t

schedul e for submissio n of

report s unde r

§ 63.10(a) , yo u mus t submi t eac hrepor t

b y th e dat e i n Tabl e 1 1 o f thi s subpar t

an d accordin g t o th e requirement s i n paragraph s (b)(1 ) throug h(5 ) o f thi s section : (1 ) Th e firs t

complianc e repor t

mus t cove r th e perio dbeginnin g o n th e complianc e dat e tha t

i s specifie dfor you r affecte dsourc e i n § 63.234 2 an d endin g o n Jun e 3 0 o r

Decembe r

31 , whicheve r

dat e i s th e firs t

dat e followin g th e en do f

th e firs t calenda r hal f afte r th e complianc e dat e tha t i s specifie dfor

you r sourc e i n § 63.2342
. (2 ) Th e firs t

complianc e repor t

mus t b e postmarke dn o late r

tha n Jul y 3 1 o r Januar y 31 , whicheve r

dat e follow s th e en dof th e firs t calenda r

hal f afte r th e complianc e dat e tha t

i s specifie dfor you r affecte dsourc e i n§ 63.2342
. (3 ) Eac hsubsequen t

complianc e repor t mus t cove r tiie semiannua l reportin g perio dfromJanuar y 1 throug h Jun e 3 0 o r

th e semiannua l reportin g perio dfromJul y 1 throug hDecembe r 31
. (4 ) Eac hsubsequen t

complianc e repor t mus t b e postmarke dn o late r tha n Jul y 3 1 o r

Januar y 31 , whicheve r

dat e i s th e firs t dat e followin g th e en do f th e semiannua l reportin g period
. (5 ) Fo r eac haffecte dsourc e tha t i s subjec t t o permittin g regulation s pursuan t t o 4 0 CFRpar t

7 0 o r 71 , i f th e permittin g authorit y ha s establishe d date s for submittin g semiannua l report s pursuan t t o 4 0 CF R70.6(3)(iii)(A ) o r 71.6(3)(iii)(A) , yo u ma y submi t th e first an dsubsequen t

complianc e report s accordin g t o th e date s th e permittin g authorit y ha s establishe dinstea dof accordin g t o th e date s i nparagraph s (b)(1 ) throug h(4 ) o f

thi s section
. (c ) Th e complianc e repor t mus t contai n th e informatio ni nparagraph s (c)(1 ) throug h(7 ) o f

thi s section : (1 ) Compan y nam e an daddress
. (2 ) Statemen t

b y aresponsibl e official , includin g th e official' s name , title , an d signature , certifyin g that , base do n informatio n an dbelie f

forme dafte r reasonabl e inquiry , th e statement s an d informatio n i nth e repor t ar e true , accurate , an dcomplete
. (3 ) Dat e o f

repor t an dbeginnin g an d endin g date s ofth e reportin g period
. (4 ) An y change s t o th e informatio n liste di n paragrap h(d ) o f thi s sectio n tha t hav e occurre dsinc e th e las t report
. (5 ) I f yo u ha dastartup , shutdown , o r malfunctio ndurin g th e reportin g perio d an dyo u too k

action s consisten t

wit h you r SSMP , th e complianc e repor t mus t includ e th e informatio ndescribe di n §63.10(d)(5)(i)
. (6 ) I f ther e ar e n o deviation s froman y emissio nlimitatio n(emissio nlimi t o r operatin g limit ) tha t

applie s t o yo u an d ther e ar e n o deviation s fromth e requirement s for

wor k practic e


# <PDP.2 1



### 1569 2 Federa l Register/Vol . 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s standard s i n Tabl e 1 0 o f thi s subpart , a statemen t

tha t ther e wer e n o deviation s fromth e emissio n limitation s o r wor k practic e standard s durin g th e reportin g period
. (7 ) I f ther e wer e n o period s durin g whic hth e CM S wa s ou t o f contro l a s specifie di n § 63.8(c)(7) , astatemen t tha t ther e wer e n o period s during'whic hth e CM S wa s ou t

o f contro l durin g th e reportin g period
. (d ) Th e firs t

complianc e repor t

mus t contai n th e informatio ni n paragraph s (c)(1 ) throug h(7 ) of

thi s sectio n an dals o th e informatio n i n paragraph s (d)(1 ) throug h(5 ) o f

thi s section : (1 ) A listin g o f

th e organi c liquid s store do r transferre da t

th e facilit y durin g th e previou s 6 months , includin g for eac hliqui dth e informatio n i n paragraph s (d)(l)(i ) throug h(iv ) of thi s section : (i ) Liqui dname ; (ii ) Tota l weigh t

percentag e o f

th e organi c HA Pi n Tabl e 1 o f thi s subpart ; (iii ) Annua l averag e tru e vapo r pressure ; an d (iv ) Tota l throughpu t

int o an dou t

of th e facility
. (2 ) A n inventor y of

al l storag e tank s a t th e facilit y tha t

store dorgani c liquid s durin g th e previou s 6 months , includin g for eac htan k

th e informatio n i n paragraph s (d)(2)(i ) throug h(iv ) o f thi s section : (i ) Tan k ID cod e an dcapacity ; (ii ) Tan k roo f configuration , ri msea l type(s) , an ddescriptio nof floating dec k fittings , a s applicable ; (iii ) Nam e o f

organi c liquid(s ) store d i n th e tank ; an d (iv ) Contro l devic e i n us e fo r eac h fixed-roo f

tank , wher e applicable
. (3 ) A listin g o f

al l transfe r

rac k loadin g position s tha t

transferre d organi c liquid s int o carg o tank s durin g th e previou s 6 months , includin g for eac hloadin g positio n th e informatio n i n paragraph s (d)(3)(i ) throug h(iii ) o f thi s section : (i ) I D code ; (ii ) Organi c liquid s name(s ) an d throughput(s) ; an d (iii ) Contro l devic e i n us e a t eac h position , wher e applicable
. (4 ) A listin g of

al l carg o tank s (tan k truck s an drailcars ) tha t loade dorgani c liquid s a t

affecte dtransfe r

rac k loadin g position s durin g th e previou s 6 months , includin g th e typ e of

carg o tank , owner , ID number , an ddat e an dtes t metho dfor th e mos t recen t vapo r tightnes s test
. (5 ) A listin g o f

al l equipmen t

i n organi c liquid s servic e durin g th e previou s 6 months , includin g for eac h componen t

th e informatio n i n paragraph s (d)(5)(i ) throug h(iv ) of thi s section : (i ) I D code ; (ii ) Facilit y pla ndrawin g showin g th e equipmen t

location ; (iii ) A nestimat e ofth e numbe r of hour s tha t

th e componen t

operate di n organi c liquid s servic e durin g th e reportin g period ; an d (iv ) Metiio do f

complianc e wit hth e standar d(e.g. , "lea k

detectio n an d repai r monitoring " o r

"equippe dwit h dua l mechanica l seals") , i f applicable
. (e ) Fo r eac hdeviatio n froma n emissio nlimitatio n (emissio nlimi t o r operatin g limit ) occurrin g a t a naffecte d sourc e wher e yo u ar e usin g aCM S t o compl y wit ha nemissio nlimitatio ni n thi s subpart , yo u mus t

includ e th e informatio ni n paragraph s (c)(1 ) throug h (4 ) an dparagraph s (e)(1 ) throug h(12 ) o f thi s section
. Thi s include s period s o f startup , shutdown , o r

malfunction
. (1 ) Th e dat e an dtime tha t eac h malfunctio n starte dan dstopped
. (2 ) Th e dat e an dtim e tha t eac hCM S wa s inoperative , excep t for zer o (low

level ) an dhigh-leve l checks
. (3 ) Th e date , time , an dduratio ntha t eac hCM S wa s ou t

o f control , includin g th e informatio n i n§ 63.8(c)(8)
. (4 ) Th e dat e an dtim e tha t eac h deviatio nstarte dan dstopped , an d whethe r eac hdeviatio n occurre ddurin g aperio do f

startup , shutdown , o r malfunction , o r

durin g anothe r

period
. (5 ) A summar y ofth e tota l duratio n o f th e deviation s durin g th e reportin g perio dan dth e tota l duratio na s a percentag e o f

th e tota l sourc e operatin g tim e durin g tha t

reportin g period
. (6 ) A breakdow n of

th e tota l duratio n of th e deviation s durin g th e reportin g perio dint o thos e tha t

ar e du e t o startup , shutdown , contro l equipmen t problems , proces s problems , othe r know n causes , an dothe r unknow n causes . (7 ) A summar y of

th e tota l duratio n o f CM S downtim e durin g th e reportin g perio dan dth e tota l duratio no f CM S downtim e a s apercentag e o f th e tota l sourc e operatin g tim e durin g tha t reportin g period
. (8 ) A n identificatio n o f

eac hHA Ptha t wa s potentiall y emitte ddurin g th e deviation
. (9 ) A brie f

descriptio n of

th e proces s a t whic hth e CM S deviatio n occurred
. (10 ) A brie f

descriptio no f

th e CMS
. (11 ) Th e dat e ofth e lates t CM S certificatio no r

audit
. (12 ) A descriptio n o f

an y change s i n CMS , processes , o r

control s sinc e th e las t reportin g period
. (f ) Eac haffecte dsourc e tha t ha s obtaine datitl e V operatin g permi t pursuan t t o 4 0 CF Rpar t 7 0 o r 7 1 mus t repor t al l deviation s a s define di nthi s subpar t i nth e semiannua l monitorin g repor t require db y 4 0 CF

R 70.6(a)(3)(iii)(A ) o r

71.6(a)(3)(iii)(A)
. I

f a n affecte dsourc e submit s acomplianc e repor t pursuan t

t o Tabl e 1 1 o f

tiiis subpar t alon g with , o r

a s par t of , th e semiannua l monitorin g repor t require d b y 4 0 CF R70.6(a)(3)(iii)(A ) o r 71.6(a)(3)(iii)(A) , an dth e complianc e repor t include s al l require dinformatio n concernin g deviation s froman y emissio n limitatio n (includin g an y operatin g limi t

o r wor k practic e standard ) requiremen t

i ntlii s subpart , w e wil l conside r

submissio n o f

th e complianc e repor t

a s satisfyin g an y obligatio nt o repor t

th e sam e deviation s i n th e semiannua l monitorin g report
. However , submissio n o f acomplianc e repor t wil l no t otherwis e affec t

an y obligatio n th e affecte dsourc e ma y hav e t o repor t deviation s frompermi t requirement s t o th e permittin g authority
. § 63.239 0 What record s must I keep ? (a) Yo u mus t

kee p record s a s describe di nparagraph s (a)(1 ) throug h (3 ) o f thi s section : (1 ) A cop y of

eac hnotificatio n an d repor t tha t yo u submitte dt o compl y wit hthi s subpart , includin g al l documentatio n supportin g an y Initia l Notificatio n o r

Notificatio nof Complianc e Statu s tha t yo u submitted , accordin g t o th e requirement s i n § 63.10(b)(1 ) an d(2)(xiv)
. (2 ) Th e record s i n § § 63.6(e)(3)(iii ) throug h(v ) an d63.10(b)(2)(i)(v ) relate d• t o startups , shutdowns , an d malfunctions
. (3 ) Result s of

performanc e tests
. (b ) Fo r eac hCMS , yo u mus t

kee p record s a s describe di nparagraph s (b)(1 ) an d(2 ) o f

thi s section : (1 ) Record s describe di n § 63.10(b)(2)(vi ) throug h(xi ) tha t appl y t o you r CMS
. (2 ) Performanc e evaluatio n plans , includin g previou s (i.e. , superseded ) version s o f

th e pla n a s require di n § 63.8(d)(3)
. (c ) Yo u mus t

kee p th e record s require di n Table s 8 , 9 , an d1 0 o f tiiis subpar t t o sho w continuou s complianc e wit heac hemissio nlimitatio n an dwor k practic e standar dtha t

applie s t o you . § 63.239 4 I n what for m an d ho wlon g must I kee p m y records ? (a ) You r record s mus t

b e i naform suitabl e an dreadil y availabl e for

expeditiou s inspectio n an drevie w accordin g t o § 63.10(b)(1)
. (b ) A s specifie di n§ 63.10(b)(1) , yo u mus t kee p you r

files o f al l informatio n (includin g al l report s an dnotifications ) for a t leas t 5 year s followin g th e dat e o f eac hoccurrence , measurement , maintenance , correctiv e action , report , o r record
. (c ) Yo u mus t

kee p eac hrecor do nsit e for a t leas t 2 year s afte r

tiie dat e o f

eac h


# 9*P.2 2

Federa l Register/Vol . 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s 1569 3

occurrence , measurement , maintenance , correctiv e action , report , o r record , accordin g t o § 63.10(b)(1)
. Yo u ma y kee p th e record s offsit e for th e remainin g 3 years . Othe r Requirement s an dInformatio n § 63.239 8 Wha t part s of th e Genera l Provision s appl y t o me ? Tabl e 1 2 o f

thi s subpar t

show s whic h part s o f th e Genera l Provision s i n § § 63. 1 throug h63.1 5 appl y t o you . § 63.240 2 Wh o implement s an d enforce s thi s subpart ? (a) Thi s subpar t

ca n b e implemente d an denforce db y th e EP A o r adelegate d authorit y suc ha s you r

State , local , o r triba l agency . If

th e EP A Administrato r ha s delegate dauthorit y t o you r State , local , o r triba l agency , the n tha t agency , a s wel l a s th e EPA , ha s th e authorit y t o implemen t

an denforc e thi s subpart
. Yo u shoul dcontac t

you r EP A Regiona l Offic e (se e lis t

i n § 63.13 ) t o fin dou t

i f thi s subpar t

i s delegate dt o you r

State , local , o r triba l agency . (b ) I n delegatin g implementatio n an d enforcemen t

authorit y for

thi s subpar t

t o aState , local , o r

triba l agenc y unde r subpar t Eo f thi s part , th e authoritie s containe di n paragrap h(c ) o f thi s sectio n ar e retaine db y th e Administrato r

o f th e EP A an dar e no t delegate dt o th e State , local , o r triba l agency . (c ) Th e authoritie s tha t

wil l no t b e delegate dt o State , local , o r triba l agencie s ar e describe di n paragraph s (c)(1 ) throug h(4 ) o f

thi s section : (1 ) Approva l o f

alternative s t o th e nonopacit y emissio n limitation s an d wor k practic e standard s i n § 63.2346(a ) throug h(c ) unde r

§ 63.6(g)
. (2 ) Approva l o f

majo r alternative s t o tes t method s unde r

§ 63.7(e)(2)(h ) an d (f ) an da s define di n § 63.90
. (3 ) Approva l o f

majo r alternative s t o monitorin g unde r

§ 63.8(f ) an da s define di n §63.90
. (4 ) Approva l o f

majo r alternative s t o recordkeepin g an dreportin g unde r § 63.10(f ) an da s define di n § 63.90
. § 63.240 6 Wha t definition s appl y t o thi s subpart ? Term s use di n thi s subpar t ar e define di n th e CAA , i n § 63.2 , an di n thi s section
. If

th e sam e ter mi s define d i n anothe r

subpar t an di n thi s section , i t wil l hav e th e meanin g give n i n thi s sectio n for

purpose s o f

thi s subpart
. Annua / average true vapor

pressure, a s use di n thi s subpart , mean s th e tota l vapo r pressur e exerte db y astore do r transferre dorgani c liqui da t th e temperatur e equa l t o th e annua l averag e o f th e loca l (nearest ) averag e monthl y temperature s reporte db y th e Nationa l Weathe r Service
. Thi s temperatur e i s th e arithmeti c averag e of th e 1 2 monthl y averag e temperature s for eac hcalenda r yea r a t eac haffecte dsourc e an di s recalculate da t

th e en do f

eac hyear . Th e vapo r pressur e valu e i s determined : (1 ) I n accordanc e wit hmethod s describe di nAmerica nPetroleu m Institut e Publicatio n 2517 , Evaporativ e Los s fromExterna l Floating-Roo f Tank s (incorporate db y referenc e a s specifie d i n §63.14) ; (2 ) Usin g standar dreferenc e texts ; . (3 ) B y th e America n Societ y for Testin g an dMaterial s Metho dD2879-8 3 (incorporate db y referenc e a s specifie d i n §63.14) ; o r (4 ) Usin g an y othe r

metho dtha t

th e EP A approves . API gravity mean s th e weigh t pe r uni t volum e o f

hydrocarbo n liquid s a s measure db y asyste mrecommende db y th e America n Petroleu mInstitut e (API ) an di s expresse di n degrees
. Black oil mean s hydrocarbo n (petroleum ) liqui dwit hagas-to-oi l rati o les s tha n 0.3 1 cubi c meter s pe r lite r (41. 4 cubi c fee t

pe r gallon ) an da nAP I gravit y les s tha n4 0 degrees , measure d a t th e poin t

o f entr y t o th e distributio n system
. Capacity mean s th e volum e of liqui d tha t i s capabl e of

bein g store di n a storag e tank , determine db y multiplyin g th e tank' s interna l cross-sectiona l are a b y th e interna l heigh t

o f th e shell
. Cargo tank

mean s atan k

truc k o r railca r int o whic horgani c liquid s ar e loade da t a n OL D operatio n transfe r rack
. Closed vent system mean s asyste m tha t i s no t ope nt o th e atmospher e an d i s compose do f

piping , ductwork , connections , and , i f

necessary , flowinducin g device s tha t

transpor t

ga s o r vapor s froma nemissio npoin t t o a contro l device
. Thi s syste mdoe s no t includ e th e vapo r

collectio n syste mtha t i s par t o f som e tan k

truck s an drailcar s o r th e loadin g ar mo r

hos e tha t

i s use d for vapo r return
. Fo r

transfe r racks , th e close dven t

syste mbegin s at , an d includes , th e firs t

bloc k valv e o nth e downstrea msid e o f

th e loadin g ar mo r hos e use dt o conve y displace dvapors . Combustion device mean s a n individua l uni t

o f equipment , suc ha s a flare , incinerator , proces s heater , o r boiler , use dfor

th e combustio n of organi c emissions
. Control device, a s use di nthi s subpart , mean s an y combustio n device , recover y device , recaptur e device , o r an y combinatio n of

thes e device s use d t o compl y wit hthi s subpart
. Suc h equipmen t

o r device s include , bu t

ar e no t limite dto , absorbers , adsorbers , condensers , incinerators , flares , boilers , an dproces s heaters
. Primar y condensers , stea mstrippers , o r fue l ga s system s ar e no t

considere dcontro l devices
. Crud e oi7 , a s use di nthi s subpart , mean s an y of

th e naturall y occurrin g liquid s commonl y referre dt o a s crud e oil , othe r tha n blac k

oil , regardles s o f specifi c physica l properties
. Crude oil pipeline hreakout

station plant site mean s afacilit y alon g a pipelin e containin g storag e tank s an d equipmen t

use dt o temporaril y stor e crud e oi l fromth e pipeline
. Breakou t station s ma y als o contai n booste r pump s use dt o mov e th e crud e oi l alon g th e pipeline
. Thes e facilitie s ar e downstrea mof

th e poin t

o f custod y transfer
. Crude oil pipeline pumping station plant site mean s afacilit y alon g a pipelin e containin g equipmen t (i.e. , booste r pumps , etc. ) use dt o sustai n th e movemen t

o f crud e oi l throug hth e pipeline
. Pumpin g station s ma y als o contai ncrud e oi l breakou t storag e tanks
. Thes e facilitie s ar e downstrea mo f th e poin t of custod y transfer
. Custody transfer

mean s th e transfe r

of hydrocarbo nliquids , afte r processin g and/o r treatmen t

i n th e producin g operations , fromstorag e tank s o r automati c transfe r

facilitie s t o pipeline s o r an y othe r

form s o f transportation
. Design evaluation mean s aprocedur e for evaluatin g contro l device s tha t complie s wit hth e requirement s i n §63.985(b)(l)(i)
. Deviation mean s an y instanc e i n whic ha naffecte dsourc e subjec t t o thi s subpart , o r

a n owne r

o r operato r o f suc h asource : (1 ) Fail s t o mee t

an y requiremen t

o r obligatio nestablishe db y thi s subpart , includin g bu t

no t limite dt o an y emissio n limitatio n (includin g an y operatin g limit ) o r

wor k practic e standard ; (2 ) Fail s t o mee t

an y ter mo r

conditio n tha t i s adopte dt o implemen t a n applicabl e requiremen t

i nthi s subpart , an dtha t i s include di n th e operatin g permi t for an y affecte dsourc e require d t o obtai nsuc hapermit ; o r (3 ) Fail s t o mee t

an y emissio n limitatio n (includin g an y operatin g limit ) o r wor k practic e standar di n thi s subpar t durin g startup , shutdown , o r malfunction , regardles s o f whethe r o r no t suc hfailur e i s permitte db y thi s subpart
. Emission limitation mean s a n emissio n limit , opacit y limit , operatin g limit , o r visibl e emissio nlimit
. Equipment

mean s eac hpump , valve , an dsamplin g connectio nsyste muse d i n organi c liquid s servic e a t a n OLD operation
. Gasoline mean s an y petroleu m distillat e o r

petroleu mdistillate/alcoho l



### ^ ^

### 1569 4 Federa l Register/Vol . 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s

blen dhavin g aRei dvapo r pressur e of 27. 6 kilopascal s (4. 0 psia ) o r greate r whic hi s use da s afue l for interna l combustio n engines
. Aviatio n gasolin e i s include di n tiiis definition
. Gas-to-oil

ratio mean s th e numbe r o f standar dcubi c meter s o f ga s produce d pe r lite r o f crud e oi l o r

othe r hydrocarbo n liquid
. In organic liquids service mean s tha t apiec e o f

equipmen t

contain s o r contact s organi c liquid s havin g 5 percen t b y weigh t

o r greate r o f th e organi c HA Pliste di n Tabl e 1 o f thi s subpart
. Organic liquid, a s use di n thi s subpart , means : (1 ) Crud e oil ; o r (2 ) An y liqui do r

liqui dmixtur e tha t contain s atota l o f

5 percen t

b y weigh t o r mor e o f th e organi c HA Pliste di n Tabl e 1 o f

thi s subpart , a s determine d usin g Metho d1 8 o f

4 0 CFRpar t

60 , appendi x A , o r

an y othe r

metho d approve db y th e Administrator
. An y fuel s consume do r

dispense ddirectl y t o user s o n th e plan t

sit e an dal l gasolin e ar e exclude dfromth e definition
. Organic liquids distribution (OLD) operation mean s th e activitie s an d equipmen t

use dt o transfe r

organi c liquid s int o o r

ou t o f aplan t site
. I t als o include s storag e o f

distribute dorgani c liquid s o n th e site
. Th e OL D operatio n ca n b e thos e activitie s performe dat a dedicate ddistributio n plan t site , o r i t ma y b e collocate di n aplan t sit e a t whic hmanufacturin g operation s ar e carrie dout
. Permitting authority mean s on e of th e following : (1 ) Th e Stat e ai r

pollutio n contro l agency , loca l agency , o r othe r agenc y authorize db y th e EP A Administrato r t o carr y ou t apermi t progra munde r

par t 7 0 o f thi s chapter ; o r (2 ) Th e EP A Administrator , i n th e cas e o f EPA-implemente dpermi t program s unde r titl e V ofth e CA A (4 2 U.S.C
. 7661 ) an dpar t

7 1 o f thi s chapter
. Plant site, a s use di n thi s subpart , mean s al l contiguou s o r adjoinin g propert y tha t

i s unde r commo n control , includin g propertie s tha t ar e separate d onl y b y aroa do r

othe r publi c right-of

way . Commo n contro l include s propertie s tha t

ar e owned , leased , o r operate db y th e sam e entity , paren t entity , subsidiary , o r

an y combination
. Research and

development

facility mean s laborator y an dpilo t plan t operation s whos e primar y purpos e i s t o conduc t researc han ddevelopmen t int o ne w processe s an dproducts , wher e th e operation s ar e unde r

th e clos e supervisio n o f

technicall y traine d personnel , an dwhic har e no t engage di n th e manufactur e o f

product s for commercia l sale , excep t i n ade minimis manner . Responsible official

mean s responsibl e officia l a s define di n 4 0 CFR 70.2
. Shutdown mean s th e cessatio n of operatio n o f

aregulate dsourc e an d equipmen t

require do r

use dt o compl y wit hthi s subpart , o r

th e emptyin g an d degassin g of

astorag e tank
. Shutdow n a s define di n thi s sectio n includes , bu t i s no t limite dto , event s tha t

resul t from periodi c maintenance , replacemen t o f equipment , o r

repair
. Storage tank, a s use di n thi s subpart , mean s astationar y uni t tha t i s constructe dprimaril y o f nonearthe n material s (suc ha s wood , concrete , steel , o r reinforce dplastic ) tha t provid e structura l suppor t

an di s designe dt o hol dabul k

quantit y of

liquid
. Storag e tank s d o no t

include : (1 ) Vessel s permanentl y attache dt o conveyance s suc ha s trucks , railcars , barges , o r

ships ; (2 ) Bottom s receive r

tanks ; (3 ) Surg e contro l vessels ; (4 ) Vessel s storin g wastewater ; o r (5 ) Reacto r vessel s associate dwiti i a manufacturin g proces s unit
. Transfer rack mean s asingl e syste m use dt o loa dorgani c liquid s int o bul k carg o tank s mounte do n o r i n atruck , truc k trailer , o r

railcar
. I t

include s al l loadin g arms , pumps , meters , shutof f valves , relie f

valves , an dothe r

pipin g an dequipmen t

necessar y for

th e transfe r operation
. Transfe r

equipmen t an doperation s tha t

ar e physicall y separat e [i.e., d o no t

shar e commo n piping , valves , an dothe r equipment ) ar e considere dt o b e separat e transfe r racks
. Transfer rack loading position mean s a n individua l tan k

truc k o r railca r parkin g spo t

a t atransfe r

rack
. A n affecte dloadin g positio n i s on e at whic h 11. 8 millio n liter s (3.1 2 millio n gallons ) pe r yea r o r mor e o f organi c liquid s ar e transferre dint o acombinatio n o f tan k truck s an drailcars
. Vapor-tight

cargo tank

mean s acarg o tan k liqui ddeliver y tan k

tha t ha s bee n demonstrate dt o b e vapor-tight
. T o b e considere dvapor-tight , acarg o tan k equippe dwit hvapo r

collectio n equipmen t

mus t underg o apressur e chang e o f

n o mor e tha n 25 0 pascal s ( 1 inc ho f water ) withi n 5 minute s afte r i t i s pressurize dt o 4,50 0 pascal s (1 8 inche s o f water)
. Thi s capabilit y mus t b o demonstrate dannuall y usin g tiie procedure s specifie di n Metho d2 7 of 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , appendi x A
. Fo r

al l othe r carg o tanks , vapo r

tightnes s i s demonstrate db y performin g tiie U.S
. Departmen t

of Transportatio n pressur e tes t procedure s fo r

tan k car s an dcarg o tanks
. Work practice standard

mean s an y design , equipment , wor k practice , o r operationa l standard , o r combinatio n thereof, tha t

i s promulgate dpursuan t t o sectio n 112(h ) ofth e CAA
. Table s t o Subpar tEEE

E o f Part6 3 TABL E 1 T O SUBPAR TEEE E O F PAR T63—ORGANI C HAZARDOU S AI R POLLUTANT S [A s state d i n § 63.2334(b) , yo u mus t us e th e informatio n liste d i n th e followin g tabl e t o determin e i f th e liquid s handle d a t you rfacilit ycontai n at leas t 5 percen t byweigh t o f thes e HAP ] Compoun d nam e CAS No. ° Acetaldehyd e Acetonitril e Acrolei n Acryli caci d Acrylonitril e Ally l chlorid e Benzen e Bi s (chloromethyl ) ethe r Bromofor m Butadien e (1,3- ) Carbo n disulfid e Carbo n tetrachlorid e Chlorobenzen e 2-Chloro-1,3-butadien e (Chloroprene)

. Chlorofor m Cumen e 75-07- 0 75-05- 8 107-02- 8 79-10- 7 107-13- 1 107-05- 1 71-43- 2 542-88- 1 75-25- 2 106-99- 0 75-15- 0 56-23- 5 108-90- 7 126-99- 8 67-66- 3 98-82- 8


# P 3P.2 4



### Federa l Register/Vol
. 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s 1569 5
TABL E 1 T O SUBPAR TEEE E O F PAR T63—ORGANI C HAZARDOU S AI R POLLUTANTS—Continue d [A s state d i n § 63.2334(b) , yo u must us e th e informatio n liste d i n th e followin g tabl e t o determin e i f th e liquid s handle d a t you rfacilit ycontai n a t leas t 5 percen t b yweigh t o f thes e HAP ] Compoun d nam e CA S No. a Dichloroethan e (1,2- ) (Ethylen e dichloride ) (EDC )

. Dichloroethylethe r(Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether) Dichloropropen e (1,3- ) Diethylen e glyco l monobuty l ethe r Diethylen e glyco l monomethy l ethe r Dimethylhydrazin e (1,1- ) Dioxan e (1,4- ) (1,4-Diethyleneoxide ) Epichlorohydri n (1-Chloro-2,3-epoxypropane ) Epoxybutan e (1,2- ) Ethy l acrylat e Ethylbenzen e Ethy l chlorid e (Chloroethane ) Ethylen e dibromid e (Dibromomethane ) Ethylen e glyco l dimethy l ethe r Ethylen e glyco l monomethy l ethe r Ethylen e glyco l monomethy l ethe racetat e Ethylen e glyco l monopheny l ethe r Ethylen e oxid e Ethyliden e dichlorid e (1,1-Dichloroethane ) Formaldehyd e Hexan e Hydrazin e Methano l Methy l bromid e (Bromomethane ) Methy l chlorid e (Chloromethane ) Methylen e chlorid e (Dichloromethane ) Methy l ethy l keton e (2-Butanone ) (MEK) Methy l hydrazin e Methy l isobuty l keton e (Hexone ) (MIBK) Methy l isocyanat e Methy l methacrylat e Methy l tert-buty l ethe r(MTBE ) Nitropropan e (2- ) Phosgen e Propionaldehyd e Propylen e dichlorid e (1,2-Dichloropropane ) Propylen e oxid e Styren e Tetrachloroethan e (1,1,2,2- ) Tetrachloroethylen e (Perchloroethylene ) Toluen e Trichloroethan e (1,1,1- ) (Methy l chloroform ) Trichloroethan e (1,1,2- ) (Viny l trichloride ) Trichloroethylen e Triethylamin e Trimethylpentan e (2,2,4- ) Viny l acetat e Viny l chlorid e (Chloroethylene ) Vinyliden e chlorid e (1,1-Dichloroethylene ) Xylen e (m- ) Xylen e (o- ) Xylen e (p- ) Xylene s (isomers an d mixtures ) 107-06- 2 111—44- 4 542-75- 6 112-34- 5 111-77- 3 57-14- 7 123-91- 1 106-89- 8 106-88- 7 140-88- 5 100-41- 4 75-00- 3 106-93- 4 110-71^ 4 109-86- 4 110-49- 6 122-99- 6 75-21- 8 75-34- 3 50-00- 0 110-54- 3 302-01- 2 67-56- 1 74-83- 9 74-87- 3 75-09- 2 78-93- 3 60-34- 4 108-10- 1 624-83- 9 80-62- 6 1634-04- 4 79-46- 9 75-44- 5 123-38- 6 78-87- 5 75-56- 9 100-42- 5 79-34- 5 127-18- 4 108-88- 3 71-55- 6 79-00- 5 79-01- 6 121-44- 8 540-84- 1 108-05- 4 75-01- 4 75-35- 4 108-38- 3 95-47- 6 106-42- 3 1330-20- 7 °CA S numbers refe rt o th e Chemica l Abstract s Service s registr ynumbe rassigne d t o specifi ccompounds , isomers , o rmixture s o f compounds

.



# ( 3 ^P.2 5



### 1569 6 Federa l Register/Vol
. 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s TABL E 2 TO SUBPAR TEEE E O F PAR T63—EMISSIO N LIMIT S [As state d i n § § 63.2338(b)(2 ) an d 63.2346(a) , yo u must compl ywit h th e emissio n limit s fo rorgani cliqui d distributio n affecte d source s I n th e followin g table ] I f yo u ow n o roperat e * An d i f * The n yo u must * 1

. Astorag e tan k

a t a n existin g affecte d sourc e wit h a capacity__7 5 cubi cme ters (20,00 0 gallons ) an d <15 1 cubi c meter s (40,00 0 gallons)

. a . Th e annua l averag e tru e vapo rpres sure o f th e store d organi cliqui d i s £13. 1 kilopascal s (1. 9 psia ) an d <76. 6 kilopascal s (11. 1 psia)

.

. Astorag e tan k

a t a n existin g affecte d sourc e wit h a capacityS15 1 cubi cme ters (40,00 0 gallons)

.

. Astorag e tan k

a t a newaffecte d sourc e wit h a capacity23 8 cubi cme ter s (10,00 0 gallons ) an d <15 1 cubi c meter s (40,00 0 gallons)

.

. Astorag e tan k

a t a ne waffecte d sourc e wit h a capacity_>151 cubi cme ter s (40,00 0 gallons)

.

. Atransfe rrac k Th e annua l averag e tru e vapo rpres sure o f th e store d organi cliqui d i s __5. 2 kilopascal s (0.7 5 psia)

. Th e annua l averag e tru e vapo rpres sure o f th e store d organi cliqui d i s >13. 1 kilopascal s (1. 9 psia ) an d <76. 6 kilopascal s (11. 1 psia)

. Th e annua l averag e tru e vapo rpres sure o f th e store d organi cliqui d i s >0. 7 kilopascal s (0. 1 psia)

. a . Th e transfe rrac k

load s at an yload
in g positio n >11. 8 millio n liters (3.1 2 millio n gallons ) pe ryea ro f organi c liquid s int o a combinatio n of tan k trucks an d railcars

. i

. Reduc e emission s o f tota l organi cHA P o rTO C by9 5 weight-percen t (or , fo rcombustio n devices , t o a n ex haus t concentratio n o f 2 0 part s pe rmillio n byvolume , o n a dr ybasis , correcte d t o 3 % oxygen ) byventin g emis
sion s throug h a close d ven t syste m t o an ycombinatio n o f contro l device s meetin g th e requirement s o f subpar t S S o f thi s part , as specifie d i n § § 63.982(a)(1 ) an d (f) , 63.983 , 63.984 , 63.985 , 63.987 , 63.988 , 63.990 , an d 63.995 ; o r ii

. Compl ywit h th e wor k practic e standard s specifie d i n Tabl e 4 , ite m 1 o f thi s subpart

. Sam e as ite m 1 o f Tabl e 2 o f thi s subpart

. Sam e as ite m 1 o f Tabl e 2 o f thi s subpart

.
Sam e a s ite m 1 o f Tabl e 2 o f thi s subpart

. Reduc e emission s o f tota l organi cHA P o rTO C at eac h affecte d loadin g positio n by9 5 weight-percen t (or , fo r combustio n devices , t o a n exhaus t concentratio n les s tha n o requa l t o 2 0 part s pe rmillio n b yvolume , o n a dr

y basis , correcte d t o 3% oxygen ) byventin g emission s throug h a close d ven t syste m t o an ycombinatio n o f con tro l device s meetin g th e requirement s o f subpar t S S o f thi s part , a s specifie d i n §§63.982(a)(3)(ii ) an d (f) , 63.983 , 63.984 , 63.987 , 63.988 , 63.990 , 63.995 , an d 63.997 ; an d

. Compl ywit h th e wor k practic e standard s specifie d i n Tabl e 4 , ite m 2 o f thi s subpart

. TABL E 3 T O SUBPAR TEEE E O F PAR T63—OPERATIN G LIMIT S [A s state d i n § § 63.2346(b ) an d 63.2370(b) , yo u must compl ywit h th e operatin g limit s fo rorgani cliqui d distributio n affecte d source s i n th e followin g table ] For * * Yo u must * * 1

. Eac h existin g an d eac h newaffecte d sourc e usin g a therma l oxidize rt o compl ywit h a n emissio n limi t i n Tabl e 2 of thi s subpart

. 2

. Eac h existin g an d eac h ne waffecte d sourc e usin g a catalyti coxidize rt o compl ywit h a n emissio n limi t i n Tabl e 2 of thi s subpart

.

3

. Eac h existin g an d eac h newaffecte d sourc e usin g a condense rt o compl ywit h a n emissio n limi t i n Tabl e 2 of thi s subpart

. 4

. Eac h existin g an d eac h newaffecte d sourc e usin g a n adsorptio n syste m wit h adsorben t regeneratio n t o com pl ywit h a n emissio n limi t i n Tabl e 2 o f thi s subpart

. Maintai n th e hourl yaverag e firebo xtemperatur e greate rtha n o requa l t o th e ref
erenc e temperature establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test
. a . Replac e th e existin g catalys t be d wit h a be d tha t meets th e replacemen t specifica
tion s establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e tes t befor e th e ag e o f th e be d exceed s th e maximu m allowabl e ag e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test ; an d b

. Maintai n th e hourl yaverag e temperatur e a t th e inle t o f th e catalys t be d greate r tha n o requa l t o th e referenc e temperatur e establishe d durin g th e desig n evalua
tio n o rperformanc e test ; an d c . Maintai n th e hourl yaverag e temperatur e differenc e acros s th e catalys t be d greate r tha n o requa l t o th e minimu m temperatur e differenc e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test
. Maintai n th e hourl yaverag e condense rexi t temperature les s tha n o requa l t o th e ref
erenc e temperature establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test
. a . Replac e th e existin g adsorben t i n eac h segmen t of th e be d wit h a n adsorben t that meet s th e replacemen t specification s establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o r performanc e tes t before th e ag e o f th e adsorben t exceed s th e maximu m allowabl e ag e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test ; an d b

. Maintai n th e frequenc yof regeneratio n greate rtha n o requa l t o th e referenc e fre
quenc yestablishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test ; ah d c . Maintai n th e tota l regeneratio n strea m mas s flo wdurin g th e adsorptio n be d regen eratio n cycl e greate rtha n o requa l t o th e referenc e strea m mas s flo westablishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test ; an d d

. Maintai n th e temperature o f th e adsorptio n be d durin g regeneratio n (excep t durin g th e coolin g cycle ) greate rtha n o requa l t o th e referenc e temperatur e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test ; an d


# pS "

### Federa l Register/Vol
. 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s 1569 7
TABL E 3 T O SUBPAR TEEE E O F PAR T63—OPERATIN G LIMITS—Continue d [A s state d i n § § 63.2346(b ) an d 63.2370(b) , yo u must compl ywit h th e operatin g limit s fo rorgani cliqui d distributio n affecte d source s i n th e followin g table ] Fo r* * * Yo u must '

5

. Eac h existin g an d eac h ne waffecte d sourc e usin g a n adsorptio n syste m withou t adsorben t regeneratio n t o compl ywit h a n emissio n limi t i n Tabl e 2 o f thi s sub
part
. 6

. Eac h existin g an d eac h ne waffecte d sourc e usin g a flar e t o compl ywit h a n emissio n limi t i n Tabl e 2 of thi s subpart

. e . Maintai n th e temperature o f th e adsorptio n be d afte rregeneratio n (an d withi n 1 5 minute s afte rcompletin g an ycoolin g cycle ) les s tha n o requa l t o th e referenc e temperatur e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test
. a . Replac e th e existin g adsorben t i n eac h segmen t o f th e be d wit h a n adsorben t tha t meets th e replacemen t specification s establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o r performanc e tes t before th e ag e of th e adsorben t exceed s th e maximu m allowabl e ag e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test ; an d b

. Maintai n th e temperature o f th e adsorptio n be d les s tha n o requa l t o th e referenc e temperature establishe d durin g th e design'evaluatio n o rperformanc e test
. a . Compl ywit h th e equipmen t an d operatin g requirement s i n § 63.987(a) ; an d b

. Conduc

t a n initia l flar e complianc e assessmen t i n accordanc e wit h § 63.987(b) ; an d c . Instal l an d operat e monitorin g equipmen t a s specifie d i n § 63.987(c)

. TABL E 4 T O SUBPAR TEEE E O F PAR T63—WOR KPRACTIC E STANDARD S [A s state d i n § 63.2346(c) , yo u mus t compl ywit h th e wor k practic e standard s fo rorgani cliqui d distributio n affecte d source s i n th e followin g table ] Fo reac h * * * Yo u must * * * 1

. Storag e tan k

a t a n existin g o rne waffecte d sourc e meetin g an yse t o f capacityan d vapo rpressure limit s specifie d i n Tabl e 2 , item s 1- 4 o f thi s subpart

. 2

. Transfe rrac k

affecte d loadin g positio n at a n existin g o rne waffecte d sourc e tha t meet s th e throughpu t cut of f specifie d i n Tabl e 2 , ite m 5 o f thi s subpart

.

3

. Piec e o f equipment , a s define d unde r63.2406 , o f thi s subpart , tha t operate s i n organi cliquid s servic e
_ _30 0 hours pe ryear . A s a n alternativ e t o th e emissio n limi t i n Tabl e 2 o f thi s subpart , compl ywit h th e re quirement s of subpar

t W W (contro l leve l 2 ) o f thi s part
. a . Fo rcarg o tank

s equippe d wit h vapo rcollectio n equipment , ensur e tha t organi cliq
uid s are loade d onl yint o carg o tanks tha t have bee n demonstrated , usin g EPA Metho d 27 , 4 0 CF R par t 60 , appendi xA withi n th e las t 1 2 months , t o b e vaportigh t (i.e. , wil l underg o a pressure chang e o f no t more tha n 25 0 pascal s ( 1 inc h o f water) withi n 5 minute s afte rbein g pressurize d t o 4,50 0 pascal s (1 8 inche s o f water))

. Followth e step s outline d i n 4 0 CF R 60.502(e ) fo rthes e equippe d carg o tanks

. Th e require d vapo rtightnes s documentatio n i s describe d i n 4 0 CF R 60.505(b) ; an d b

. Fo rcarg o tank

s withou t vapo rcollectio n equipment , ensur e tha t organi cliquid s are loade d onl yint o carg o tanks tha t have a curren t certificatio n i n accordanc e wit h th e U.S

. DO

Tpressure tes t requirements ; an d c . Compl ywit h th e provision s i n 4 0 CF R 60.502(d) , (f) , (g) , (h) , an d (i ) fo rth e equippe d carg o tank

s describe d i n ite m 2. a i n Tabl e 4 o f thi s subpart

. Compl ywit h th e requiremen t o f subpar t T T (contro l leve l 1 ) o rsubpar t U U (contro l leve l 2 ) of thi s part
.
TABL E 5 T O SUBPAR TEEE E O F PAR T63—REQUIREMENT S FO R PERFORMANC E TESTS [A s state d i n §§63.235 8 an d 63.2362(a) , yo u mus t compl ywit h th e requirement s fo rperformanc e test s fo rexistin g o rnewaffecte d source s i n th e followin g table ] Fo r* * * 1

. Eac h existin g an d eac h ne waffecte d sourc e usin g a nonflar e contro l devic e t o compl ywit h a n emissio n limi t i n Tabl e 2 o f thi s subpart

. Yo u must conduc t a performanc e tes t * * * a . T o determin e th e or gani cHA P o rTO C con tro l efficienc

yo f eac h nonflar e contro l device , o rth e exhaus t con centratio n o f eac h com bustio n device

. Usin g * * * i

. Metho d 1 o r1 Ai n ap pendi xAo f 4 0 CF R par

t 60 , a s appropriate

.

ii

. Metho d 2 , 2A , 2C , 2D , 2F , o r2 G i n appendi xA o f 4 0 CF R par

t 60 , a s appropriate

. iii

. Metho d 3 o r3 B i n ap pendi xAof 4 0 CF R par

t 60 , as appropriate

. iv

. Metho d 4 i n appendi xA o f 4 0 CF R par

t 60

. T o determin e * * *

(1 ) Samplin g por

t location s an d th e require d numbe r o f travers e points

.

Stac k ga s velocityan d vol
umetri cflo wrate.
. Concentratio n o f C0 2 an d 0 2 an d dr

ymolecula r weigh t o f th e stac k

gas . Moisture conten t of th e stac k gas . Accordin g t o th e followin g requirement s * * * (A) Samplin g site s mus t b e locate d a t th e inle t an d outle t o f eac h contro l devic e an d prio rt o an y release s t o th e atmos phere ; an d (B ) Samplin g site s must b e locate d at th e outle t o f eac h contro l devic e an d prio rt o an yrelease s t o th e atmosphere

. Se e th e requiremen t i n ite m 1.a.i.(1)(A)and(B ) o f thi s table

. Se e th e requiremen t i n ite m 1.a.i.(1)(A)and(B ) o f thi s table

. Se e th e requiremen t i n ite m 1.a.i.(1)(A)an d (B ) o f thi s table

. 

# ^(eP.2 7



### 1569 8 Federa l Register/Vol
. 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s

TABL E 5 T O SUBPAR TEEE E O F PAR T63—REQUIREMENT S FO R PERFORMANC E TESTS—Continue d [As state d i n § § 63.235 8 an d 63.2362(a) , yo u must compl ywit h th e requirement s fo rperformanc e test s fo rexistin g o rnewaffecte d source s i n th e followin g table ] Fo r* * *

2

. Eac h carg o tan k

tha t yo u ow n that load s a t a n existin g o rnewaffecte d transfe rrac k

loadin g po sitio n an d equippe d wit h vapo rcollectio n equip
ment
. Yo u must conduc t a performanc e tes t * * *

T o determin e th e vapo r tightnes s o f th e tan k

an d repai ra s neede d unti l i t passe s th e test
. Usin g * * *
v . Metho d 18 , 25 , or25 A i n appendi xAo f 4 0 CF R par t 60 , as appropriate , o rMetho d 31 6 i n appen di xAo f 4 0 CF R par

t 6 3 fo rmeasurin g formalde
hyde

.

Metho d 2 7 i n appendi xA o f 4 0 CF R par

t 60

. T o determin e * * *

(1 ) Tota l organi cHA P o r TOC , o rformaldehyd e emissions

.

Vapo rtightnes s Accordin g t o th e followin g requirement s * * * (A) Th e organi cHA P use d fo rth e calibratio n gas fo rMetho d 25 Amust b e th e singl e organi cHA P representin g th e larges t percen t byvolum e o f emissions ; an d (B ) durin g th e performanc e tes t o ra desig n evalua
tion , yo u must establis h th e operatin g paramete r limit s withi n whic h tota l organi cHA P o rTO C emission s are reduce d b yat leas t 9 5 weight
percen t o rt o 2 0 ppm v exhaus t concentratio n Th e pressure chang e I n th e tan k must b e n o more tha n 25 0 pascal s ( 1 inc h o f water) i n 5 minute s afte ri t i s pres surize d t o 4,50 0 pascal s (1 8 inche s o f water)

. TABL E 6 T O SUBPAR TEEE E O F PAR T63—INITIA L COMPLIANC E WIT H EMISSIO N LIMIT S [A s state d i n § § 63.2370(a ) an d 63.2382(e) , yo u must showinitia l complianc e wit h th e emissio n limit s fo rexistin g o rnewaffecte d source s accordin g t o th e followin g table ] Fo reac h ' Fo rth e followin g emissio n limit * * * Yo u have demonstrate d initia l complianc e i f * * * By ' 1

. Storag e tan k

a t a n existin g af
fecte d sourc e meetin g eithe rse t o f capacityan d vapo rpressure limit s specifie d i n Tabl e 2 , item s 1 an d 2 o f thi s subpart

.

. Storag e tan k

a t a ne waffecte d sourc e meetin g eithe rse t o f ca pacityan d vapo rpressure limit s specifie d i n Tabl e 2 , item s 3 an d 4 o f thi s subpart

.

. Transfe rrac k

loadin g positio n at a n existin g affecte d sourc e meetin g th e throughpu t leve l fo r organi cliquid s specifie d i n Tabl e 2 , ite m 5 o f thi s subpart

.

. Transfe rrac k

loadin g positio n at a newaffecte d sourc e meetin g th e throughpu t leve l fo rorgani c liquid s specifie d i n Tabl e 2 , ite m 5 o f thi s subpart

. a . Reduc e tota l organi cHA P o r TO C emission s b ya t leas t 9 5 weight-percent , o rt o a n ex haus t concentratio n o f 22 0 ppmv . Se e th e emissio n limi t i n ite m 1.a

. o f thi s table

.
Se e th e emissio n limi t i n ite m 1.a.i.(1)(A) an d (B ) o f thi s table

.
Se e th e emissio n limi t i n ite m 1.a.i.(1)(A) an d (B ) o f thi s table

. i

. Tota l organi cHA P o rTO C emissions , base d o n th e result s of th e performanc e testin g specifie d i n Tabl e 5 o f thi s sub
part , ar e reduce d b

yat leas t 9 5 weight-percen t o rt o a n exhaus t concentratio n of <2 0 ppmv . Se e th e complianc e demonstra
tio n i n ite m l.a.i

. o f thi s table

.
Se e th e complianc e demonstra
tio n i n ite m 1.a.i.(1)(A) an d (B ) o f thi s table

. Se e th e complianc e demonstra
tio n ite m 1.a.i.(1)(A) an d (B ) o f thi s table

. 3 years afte r[publicatio n dat e o f fina l rul e i n th e FR]

.

Th e initia l startu p dat e fo rth e af
fecte d source .
3 years afte r[publicatio n dat e o f fina l rul e i n th e FR]

.
Th e initia l startu p dat e fo rth e af
fecte d source .



# P

'P.2 8



### Federa l Register/Vol
. 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s 1569 9
TABL E 7 T O SUBPAR TEEE E O F PAR T63—INITIA L COMPLIANC E WIT H WOR KPRACTIC E STANDARD S [As state d i n § § 63.2370(a ) an d 63.2382(e) , yo u must showinitia l complianc e wit h th e wor k practic e standard s fo rexistin g o rnewaffecte d source s accordin g t o th e followin g table ] Fo reac h * * * Fo rth e followin g standard * Yo u have demonstrate d initia l complianc e i f * * * By '

. Storag e tan k

a t a n existin g af
fecte d sourc e meetin g eithe rse t o f capacit yan d vapo rpressur e specifie d i n Tabl e 2 , item s 1 an d 2 o f thi s subpart

.
2

. Storag e tan k

a t a newaffecte d sourc e meetin g eithe rse t o f ca pacityan d vapo rpressur e limit s specifie d i n Tabl e 2 , item s 3 an d 4 o f thi s subpart

. 3

. Transfe rrac k

loadin g positio n at a n existin g affecte d sourc e tha t meet s th e throughpu t cutoff i n Tabl e 2 , ite m 5 o f thi s subpart

. 4

. Transfe rrack

loadin g positio n at a ne w affecte d sourc e that meet s th e throughpu t cutoff i n Tabl e 2 , ite m 5 o f thi s subpart

. 5

. Piec e o f equipmen t a t a n exist
in g affecte d source , a s define d unde r§63.241 0 tha t operate s i n organi cliquid s servic e 2 30 0 hours pe ryear . 6

. Piec e o f equipmen t a t a ne waf
fecte d source , a s define d unde r §63.241 0 tha t operate s i n organi cliquid s servic e > 30 0 hours pe ryear . Instal l a floatin g roo f o requivalen t contro l that meet s th e require
ment s i n Tabl e 4 , ite m 1 o f thi s subpart

.

Se e th e standard i n ite m 1

. o f thi s table

.
Loa d organi cliquid s onl yint o carg o tanks havin g curren t vapo rtightnes s certificatio n a s describe d i n Tabl e 4 , ite m 2 o f thi s subpart

. Se e th e standard i n ite m 3

. o f thi s table

. Carr you t a lea k

detectio n an d re pai rprogra m o requivalen t con tro l accordin g t o on e o f th e sub
part s liste d i n Tabl e 4 , ite m 3 of thi s subpart

. Se e th e standard i n ite m 5

. of thi s table

. Yo u visuall yinspect eac h interna l floatin g roof before th e initia l fill
in g o f th e storag e tank , an d perfor m sea l ga p inspection s o f th e primar

yan d secondar

yrim seal s o f eac h externa l floatin g roof withi n 9 0 days afte rth e ini
tia l fillin g o f th e storag e tank

. Se e th e complianc e demonstra
tio n i n ite m 1

. o f thi s table

.
Yo u tak e step s t o ensure tha t onl yvapor-tigh t carg o tanks loa d a t affecte d loadin g posi
tions

. Se e th e complianc e demonstra
tio n i n ite m 3

. o f thi s table

. Yo u make availabl e writte n speci
fication s fo rth e lea k

detectio n an d repai rprogra m o requiva
len t contro l approach

. Se e th e complianc e demonstra
tio n i n ite m 5

. o f thi s table

. 3 years afte r[publicatio n dat e o f fina l rul e i n th e FR]

.

Th e initia l startu p dat e fo rth e af
fecte d source .
3 years afte r[publicatio n dat e o f fina l rul e i n th e FR]

.
Th e initia l startu p dat e fo rth e af
fecte d source . 3 years afte r[publicatio n dat e o f fina l rul e i n th e FR]

.
Th e initia l startu p dat e fo rth e af
fecte d source .

TABL E 8 T O SUBPAR TEEE E O F PAR T63—CONTINUOU S COMPLIANC E WIT H EMISSIO N LIMIT S [A s state d i n § § 63.2378(a ) an d (b ) an d 63.2390(c) , yo u must showcontinuou s complianc e wit h th e emissio n limit s fo rexistin g o rne waffecte d source s accordin g t o th e followin g table ] Fo r* * * Fo rth e followin g emissio n limi t * Yo u must demonstrat e continuou s complianc e by * * * 1

. Eac h storag e tan k

a t a n existin g o rne waf
fecte d sourc e meetin g an yse t o f capacity an d vapo rpressure limit s specifie d i n Tabl e 2 , item s 1 throug h 4 o f thi s subpart

.

. Eac h transfe rrac k

loadin g positio n at a n ex istin g o rne w affecte d sourc e meetin g th e throughpu t cutoff fo rorgani cliquid s specifie d i n Tabl e 2 , ite m 5 o f thi s subpart

. a . Reductio n of tota l organi cHA P o rTO C emission s fro m th e close d ven t syste m an d contro l devic e must b e 9 5 weight-percen t o r greater , o r2 0 ppm vo f organi cHA P o rTO C i n th e exhaus t o f combustio n devices

. Se e th e emissio n limi t i n ite m 1 .a . o f thi s tabl e i

. Performin g CM S monitorin g an d collectin g dat a accordin g t o §§63.2366 , 63.2374 , an d 63.2378 ; an d ii

. Maintainin g th e site-specifi coperatin g limit s withi n th e range s establishe d durin g th e de
sig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test
. Se e th e complianc e demonstratio n i n ite m l.a.i

. andii

. o f thi s table

.

TABL E 9 T O SUBPAR TEEE E O F PAR T63—CONTINUOU S COMPLIANC E WIT H OPERATIN G LIMIT S [As state d i n § § 63.2378(a ) an d (b ) an d 63.2390(c) , yo u must showcontinuou s complianc e wit h th e operatin g limit s fo rexistin g o rnewaffecte d source s accordin g t o th e followin g table ] Fo reac h existin g an d eac h new* * * Fo rth e followin g operatin g limi t * * * Yo u must demonstrat e continuou s complianc e by* * * 1

. Affecte d sourc e usin g a therma l oxidize rt o compl ywit h a n emissio n limi t i n Tabl e 2 o f thi s subpart

. a . Maintai n th e hourl yaverag e firebo xtem perature greate rtha n o requa l t o th e ref
erenc e temperatur e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test
. i

. Continuousl ymonitorin g an d recordin g fire
boxtemperatur e ever

y1 5 minute s an d maintainin g th e hourl yaverag e firebo xtem peratur e greate rtha n o requa l t o th e ref
erenc e temperatur e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test ; an d ii

. Keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998

.



### c£> 'P.2 9



### 1570 0 Federa l Register/Vol
. 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s TABL E 9 T O SUBPAR TEEE E O F PAR T63—CONTINUOU S COMPLIANC E WIT H OPERATIN G LIMITS ' [A s state d i n 

### -Continue d

63.2378(a ) an d (b ) an d 63.2390(c) , yo u must showcontinuou s complianc e wit h th e operatin g limit s fo rexistin g o rnewaffecte d source s accordin g t o th e followin g table ] Fo reac h existin g an d eac h new' Fo rth e followin g operatin g limi t * * * Yo u must demonstrat e continuou s complianc e by * * * 2

. Affecte d sourc e usin g a catalyti coxidize rt o compl ywit h a n emissio n limi t i n Tabl e 2 o f thi s subpart

.

3

. Affecte d sourc e usin g a condense rt o compl y wit h a n emissio n limi t i n Tabl e 2 of thi s sub
part
.

4

. Affecte d sourc e usin g a n adsorptio n syste m wit h adsorben t regeneratio n t o compl ywit h a n emissio n limi t i n Tabl e 2 o f thi s subpart

. a . Replac e th e existin g catalys t be d wit h a catalys t be d that meet s th e replacemen t specification s establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e tes t before th e ag e o f th e be d exceed s th e maximu m al
lowabl e ag e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test
. b

. Maintai n th e hourl yaverag e temperatur e a t th e inle t o f th e catalys t be d greate rtha n o r equa l t o th e referenc e temperatur e estab
lishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test
.

c . Maintai n th e houri yaverag e temperatur e differenc e acros s th e catalys t be d greate r tha n o requa l t o th e minimu m temperature differenc e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test
.

a . Maintai n th e houri yaverag e condense rexi t temperatur e les s tha n o requa l t o th e ref
erenc e temperature establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test
.

a . Replac e th e existin g adsorben t i n eac h segmen t o f th e be d wit h a n adsorben t that meets th e replacemen t specification s estab
lishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e tes t before th e ag e o f th e adsorb
en t exceed s th e maximu m allowabl e ag e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o r performanc e test
. b

. Maintai n th e frequenc yof regeneratio n greate rtha n o requa l t o th e referenc e fre
quenc yestablishe d durin g th e desig n eval
uatio n o rperformanc e test
.
c . Maintai n th e regeneratio n strea m mas s flo w durin g th e adsorptio n be d regeneratio n cycl e greate rtha n o requa l t o th e referenc e strea m mas s flo westablishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test
. Replacin g th e existin g catalys t be d wit h a catalys t be d tha t meet s th e replacemen t specification s establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e tes t before th e ag e o f th e be d exceed s th e maximu m al
lowabl e ag e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test ; an d

. Keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998

. Continuousl ymonitorin g an d recordin g th e temperatur e at th e inle t o f th e catalys t be d a t leas t ever

y1 5 minute s an d maintainin g th e hourl yaverag e temperatur e at th e inle t o f th e catalys t be d greate rtha n o requa l t o th e referenc e temperatur e establishe d dur
in g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test ; an d

. Keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d I n §63.998

. Continuousl ymonitorin g an d recordin g th e temperatur e at th e outle t o f th e catalys t be d ever y1 5 minute s an d maintainin g th e hour
l yaverag e temperatur e differenc e acros s th e catalys t be d greate rtha n o requa l t o th e minimu m temperatur e differenc e estab
lishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test ; an d

. Keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998

. Continuousl ymonitorin g an d recordin g th e temperature a t th e exi t o f th e condense rat least ever y1 5 minute s an d maintainin g th e hourl yaverag e condense rexi t temperatur e les s tha n o requa l t o th e referenc e tem perature establishe d durin g th e desig n eval
uatio n o rperformanc e test ; an d

. Keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d I n §63.998

. Replacin g th e existin g adsorben t i n eac h segmen t o f th e be d wit h a n adsorben t that meets th e replacemen t specification s estab
lishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rper formanc e tes t befor e th e ag e o f th e adsorb
en t exceed s th e maximu m allowabl e ag e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o r performanc e test ; an d

. Keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998

. Maintainin g th e frequencyo f regeneratio n greate rtha n o requa l t o th e referenc e fre
quenc yestablishe d durin g th e desig n eval
uatio n o rperformanc e test ; an d

. Keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d I n §63.998

. Maintainin g th e tota l regeneratio n strea m mas s flo wdurin g th e adsorptio n be d regen eratio n cycl e greate rtha n o requa l t o th e referenc e strea m mas s flo westablishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperform
anc e test ; an d

. Keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998

.



### ^

### Federa l Register/Vol
. 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s 1570 1
TABL E 9 T O SUBPAR TEEE E O F PAR T63—CONTINUOU S COMPLIANC E WIT H OPERATIN G LIMITS—Continue d [A s state d i n § § 63.2378(a ) an d (b ) an d 63.2390(c) , yo u must showcontinuou s complianc e wit h th e operatin g limit s fo rexistin g o rnewaffecte d source s accordin g t o th e followin g table ] Fo reac h existin g an d eac h new* * * Fo rth e followin g operatin g limi t * * * Yo u mus t demonstrat e continuou s complianc e by * * *

5

. Affecte d sourc e usin g a n adsorptio n syste m withou t adsorben t regeneratio n t o compl y wit h a n emissio n limi t i n Tabl e 2 o f thi s sub
part
.

6

. Affecte d sourc e usin g a flar e t o compl ywit h a n emissio n limi t i n Tabl e 2 o f thi s subpart

. d

. Maintai n th e temperature of th e adsorptio n be d durin g regeneratio n (excep t durin g th e coolin g cycle ) greate rtha n o requa l t o th e referenc e temperature establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test
.

e . maintai n th e temperature o f th e adsorptio n be d afte rregeneratio n (an d withi n 1 5 min
ute s afte rcompletin g an ycoolin g cycle ) les s tha n o requa l t o th e referenc e tem peratur e establishe d durin g th e desig n eval
uatio n o rperformanc e test
.
a . Replac e th e existin g adsorben t i n eac h segmen t o f th e be d wit h a n adsorben t tha t meet s th e replacemen t specification s estab
lishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rper formanc e tes t before th e ag e of th e adsorb
en t exceed s th e maximu m allowabl e ag e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o r performanc e test
. b

. Maintai n th e temperature o f th e adsorptio n be d les s tha n o requa l t o th e referenc e temperature establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test
.
a . Maintai n a pilo t flam e presen t i n th e flar e at al l time s tha t vapor

s are not bein g vente d t o th e flar e (§63.11(b)(5))

. b

. Maintai n a flar e flam e at al l time s that va por s are bein g vente d fro m th e emissio n sourc e ( § 63.11(b)(5))

.
c . Operat e th e flar e wit h n o visibl e emissions , excep t fo ru p t o 5 minute s i n an y2 con secutiv e hours (§63.11(b)(4))

. d

. Operat e th e flar e wit h a n exi t velocitytha t i s withi n th e applicabl e limit s i n §63.1 1 (b)(6) , (7) , an d (8)

. e . Operat e th e flar e wit h a ne t heatin g valu e o f th e ga s bein g combuste d greate rtha n th e applicabl e minimu m valu e i n §63.11(b)(6)(H)

. i

. Maintainin g th e temperatur e o f th e adsorp
tio n be d durin g regeneratio n (excep t durin g th e coolin g cycle ) greate rtha n o requa l t o th e referenc e temperatur e establishe d dur
in g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test ; an d ii

. Keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998

. i

. Maintainin g th e temperatur e o f th e adsorp
tio n be d afte rregeneratio n (an d withi n 1 5 minute s afte rcompletin g an ycoolin g cycle ) les s tha n o requa l t o th e referenc e tem peratur e establishe d durin g th e desig n eval
uatio n o rperformanc e test ; an d ii

. Keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998

. i

. Replacin g th e existin g adsorben t i n eac h segmen t o f th e be d wit h a n adsorben t that meet s th e replacemen t specification s estab
lishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rper formanc e tes t befor e th e ag e o f th e adsorb
en t exceed s th e maximu m allowabl e ag e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o r performanc e test ; an d ii

. Keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998

. i

. Maintainin g th e temperatur e o f th e adsorp
tio n be d les s tha n o requa l t o th e referenc e temperatur e establishe d durin g th e desig n evaluatio n o rperformanc e test ; an d ii

. Keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998

. i

. Continuousl yoperatin g a devic e tha t detect s th e presenc e o f th e pilo t flame ; an d ii

. Keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998

. i

. Maintainin g a flar e flam e a t al l time s tha t vapors ar e bein g vente d fro m th e emissio n source ; an d ii

. Keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998

. i

. Operatin g th e flar e wit h n o visibl e emission s exceedin g th e amoun t allowed ; an d ii

. Keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998

. i

. Operatin g th e flar e withi n th e applicabl e exi t velocitylimits ; an d ii

. Keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998

. i

. Operatin g th e flar e wit h th e ga s ne t heatin g valu e withi n th e applicabl e limit ; an d ii

. Keepin g th e applicabl e record s require d i n §63.998

.



# DP.3 1



### 1570 2 Federa l Register/Vol
. 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s TABL E 1 0 T O SUBPAR TEEE E O F PAR T63—CONTINUOU S COMPLIANC E WIT H WOR KPRACTIC E STANDARD S [As state d i n § § 63.2378(a ) an d (b ) an d 63.2386(c)(6) , yo u must showcontinuou s complianc e wit h th e wor k practic e standard s fo rexistin g o r newaffecte d source s accordin g t o th e followin g table ] For* * Fo rth e followin g standard * * * Yo u must demonstrat e continuou s complianc e by * * * 1

. Eac h interna l floatin g roo f (IFR ) storag e tan k a t a n existin g o rnewaffecte d sourc e meetin g an yse t of capacityan d vapo rpressure limit s specifie d i n Tabl e 2 , item s 1 throug h 4 o f thi s subpart

.
2

. Eac h externa l floatin g roo f (EFR ) storag e tan k a t a n existin g o rnewaffecte d sourc e meetin g an yse t o f capacityan d vapo rpres sure limit s specifie d i n Tabl e 2 , item s 1 throug h 4 o f thi s subpart

.

3

. Eac h IF R o rEF R tan k a t a n existin g o rnew affecte d sourc e meetin g an yse t o f capacity an d vapo rpressure limit s specifie d i n Tabl e 2 , item s 1 throug h 4 o f thi s subpart

. a . Instal l a floatin g roof designe d an d operate d accordin g t o th e applicabl e specifica
tion s i n § 63.1063(a ) an d (b)

.

a . Se e th e standard i n ite m 1.a

. o f thi s tabl e

a . Repai rth e condition s causin g storag e tan k inspectio n failure s ( § 63.1063(e))

. i

. Visuall yinspectin g th e floatin g roof deck , dec k fittings , an d ri m seal s o f eac h IFR : onc e pe ryear , an d eac h tim e th e storag e tan k i s completel yemptie d an d degassed , o rever y1 0 years , whicheve roccurs firs t (§63.1063(c)(1) , (d) , an d (e)) ; an d ii

. Keepin g th e tan k

record s require d I n §63.1065

. i

. Visuall yinspectin g th e floatin g roof deck , dec k fittings , an d ri m seal s o f eac h EF R eac h tim e th e storag e tan k i s completel y emptie d an d degassed , o rever y1 0 years , whicheve roccurs firs t (§63.1063(c)(2) , (d) , an d (e)) ; an d ii

. Performin g sea l ga p measurement s o n th e secondar ysea l o f eac h EF R at least onc e ever yyear , an d o n th e primar ysea l o f eac h EF R a t leas t ever

y5 years (§63.1063(c)(2) , (d) , an d (e)) ; an d iii

. Keepin g th e tan k

record s require d I n §63.1065

. i

. Repairin g condition s causin g inspectio n fail
ures : before refillin g th e storag e tan k wit h liquid , o rwithi n 4 5 days (o ru p t o 10 5 days wit h extensions ) fo ra tan k containin g liquid ; an d ii

. keepin g th e tan k

record s require d I n §63.1065(b)

. TABL E 1 1 T O SUBPAR TEEE E O F PAR T63—REQUIREMENT S FO R REPORT S [A s state d i n § 63.2386(b ) an d (f) , yo u must submi t a complianc e o rstartup , shutdown , an d malfunctio n repor t accordin g t o th e followin g table ] Yo u mus t submi t a (n) ' Th e repor t must contai n * Yo u must submi t th e repor t ' 1

. Complianc e repor

t

2

. Immediat e startup , shutdown , an d malfunc
tio n repor

t i f yo u ha d a startup , shutdown , o r malfunctio n durin g th e reportin g perio d tha t i s no t consisten t wit h you rSSMP

. a . A statemen t that ther e wer e n o deviation s fro m th e standard s durin g th e reportin g pe riod ; o ri f yo u have a deviatio n fro m an y standard durin g th e reportin g period , th e re por t must contai n th e informatio n i n § 63.2386(e)

. b

. I f yo u ha d a startup , shutdown , o rmalfunc
tio n durin g th e reportin g perio d an d yo u too k action s consisten t wit h you rSSMP , th e complianc e repor

t must includ e th e informa
tio n i n §63.10(d)(5)(i)

. a . Action s take n fo rth e even t

b

. Th e informatio n i n § 63.10(d)(5)(H ) i

. Semiannually , an d report , i t must b e post marke d withi n 3 0 day s afte rth e en d o f eac h calenda rhal f (§63.10(e)(3)(v))

.
Se e th e submissio n i n ite m 1 .a.i

. o f thi s table

.

B yfa xo rtelephon e withi n 2 workin g days afte rstartin g action s inconsisten t wit h th e plan

. B ylette rwithi n 7 workin g day s afte rth e en d o f th e even t unles s yo u hav e mad e alter
nativ e arrangement s wit h th e permittin g au thority(§63.10(d)(5)(ii))

. TABL E 1 2 T O SUBPAR TEEE E O F PAR T63—APPLICABILITYO F GENERA L PROVISION S T O SUBPAR TEEE E [A s state d i n §63.2398 , yo u must compl ywit h th e applicabl e Genera l Provision s requirement s accordin g t o th e followin g table] : Citatio n §63. 1 §63. 2 §63. 3 §63. 4 Subjec t Applicability Unit s an d Abbreviation s Prohibite d Activitie s an d Cir
cumvention

. Brief descriptio n Initia l applicabilitydetermination ; Applicabilityafte rstandard established ; Permi t requirements ; Extensions , Notifications

. Definition s fo rpar

t 6 3 standard s Units an d abbreviation s fo rpar t 6 3 standard s Prohibite d activities ; Circumvention , Severability Applie s t o subpar t EEE E Yes

. Ye s Yes

. Yes

. 

# 31P.3 2



### Federa l Register/Vol
. 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s 1570 3
TABL E 

### 1 2 T O SUBPAR T

### EEE E O F PAR T63—APPLICABILITYO F GENERA L PROVISION S T O SUBPAR T

### EEEE—Continue d [A s state d i n §63.2398 , yo u must compl ywit h th e applicabl e Genera l Provision s requirement s accordin g t o th e followin g table] : Citatio n §63. 5 §63.6(a ) §63.6(b ) § 63.6(b)(5 ) § 63.6(b)(6 ) §63.6(b )
§63.6(c)(1H2 )
§63.6(c)(3H4 ) § 63.6(c)(5 ) §63.6(d ) §63.6(e)(1)-(2 )

§ 63.6(e)(3 ) §63.6(0(1 ) §63.6(f)(2)-<3 ) §63.6(g)(1H3 ) §63.6(h ) § 63.6(h)(1 ) §63.6(h)(2)(i ) § 63.6(h)(2)(H ) §63.6(h)(2)(iii ) § 63.6(h)(3 ) § 63.6(h)(4 ) §63.6(h)(5)(i) , (III)
- (v)

. § 63.6(h)(5)(H ) § 63.6(h)(6 ) §63.6(h)(7)(i ) §63.6(h)(7)(ii ) §63.6(h)(7)(iii ) §63.6(h)(7)(iv ) Subject

Construction/Reconstructio n Complianc e wit h Standards / O&M-Applicability

. Complianc e Date s fo rNewan d Reconstructe d Sources

. Notificatio n [Reserved ] Complianc e Date s fo rNe wan d .Reconstructe d Are a Source s tha t Becom e Major

. Complianc e Date s fo rExistin g Sources

. [Reserved ] Complianc e Date s fo rExistin g Are a Source s tha t Becom e Major

. [Reserved ] Operatio n & Maintenanc e

Startup , Shutdown , an d Malfunc
tio n (SSM ) Plan

. Complianc e excep t Durin g SS M Method s fo rDeterminin g Compli
ance . Alternativ e Standard OpacityA/isibl e Emissio n (VE ) Standards

. Complianc e wit h opacity/V E Standards

. Determinin g Complianc e wit h OpacityA/ E Standards

. [Reserved ] Usin g Previou s Test s t o Dem
onstrat e Complianc e wit h Opacity/V E Standards

. [Reserved ] Notificatio n o f Opacity/V E Obser
vatio n Date

. Conductin g Opacity/V E Observa
tions

. OpacityTes t Duratio n an d Aver
agin g Times

. Record s o f Condition s Durin g Opacity/V E Observations

. Repor t COM S Monitorin g Dat a fro m Performanc e Test

. Usin g COM S instea d o f Metho d 9

. Averagin g Tim e fo rCOM S durin g Performanc e Test

. COM S Requirement s Brie f descriptio n Applicability ; Applications ; Approval s G P appl yunles s complianc e extension ; G P appl yt o are a source s that becom e major

. Standard s appl yat effectiv e date ; 3 years afte reffectiv e date ; upo n startup ; 1 0 years afte rconstructio n o rrecon structio n commence s fo rsectio n 112(f)

. Must notif

yi f commence d constructio n o rreconstructio n afte rproposal

. Are a source s tha t becom e majo rmus t compl ywit h majo r sourc e standard s immediatel yupo n becomin g major , re gardles s of whethe rrequire d t o compl ywhe n the ywer e a n are a source . Compl yaccordin g t o dat e i n subpart , whic h must b e n o late r tha n 3 years afte reffectiv e date ; fo rsectio n 112(f ) stand
ards , compl ywithi n 9 0 days o f effectiv e dat e unles s com plianc e extension

. Are a source s tha t becom e majo rmust compl ywit h majo r sourc e standard s b ydat e indicate d i n subpar t o rb yequiv
alen t tim e perio d (e.g. , 3 years)

. Operat e t o minimiz e emission s at al l times ; correct malfunc
tion s as soo n a s practicable ; an d operatio n an d mainte
nance requirement s independentl yenforceable ; informa
tio n Administrato rwil l us e t o determin e i f operatio n an d maintenanc e requirement s wer e met
. Requiremen t fo rSS M plan ; conten t o f SS M pla n Yo u must compl ywit h emissio n standard s at al l time s ex cep t durin g SSM

. Complianc e base d o n performanc e test , operatio n an d main
tenanc e plans , records , inspection

. Procedure s fo rgettin g a n alternativ e standard Requirement s fo ropacityan d visibl e emissio n standard s Yo u must compl ywit h opacity/V E standard s a t al l time s ex cep t durin g SSM

. I f standard doe s no t stat e tes t method , us e Metho d 9 fo r opacityan d Metho d 2 2 fo rVE

. Criteri a fo rwhe n previou s opacity/V E testin g ca n b e use d t o showcomplianc e wit h thi s subpart

. Mus t notif yAdministrato ro f anticipate d dat e o f observatio n . . Date s an d schedul e fo rconductin g opacity/V E observation s Mus t hav e a t leas t 3 hour s o f observatio n wit h thirt y6 - minut e averages . Must kee p record s availabl e an d allo wAdministratio n t o in
spect
. Mus t submi t COM S dat a wit h othe rperformanc e tes t dat a .. . Ca n submi t COM S dat a instea d o f Metho d 9 result s eve n i f rul e require s Metho d 9 , bu t mus t notif yAdministrato rbe
for e performanc e test
. T o determin e compliance , must reduc e COM S dat a t o 6 - minut e averages . Owner/operato rmus t demonstrat e tha t COM S performanc e evaluation s are conducte d accordin g t o § 63.8(e) ; COM S are properl ymaintaine d an d operate d accordin g t o § 63.8(c) an d dat a qualityas § 63.8(d)

. Applie s t o subpar t EEE E Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

.
Yes

.

Yes

.
Yes

.

Yes

. Yes

. Ye s Yes

. No

. Th e subpar

t doe s no t hav e opacity/V E standards

. No

. No

. 

### / No

.
N o No

. No

. No

. No

. No

. No

. N o



# 3 ^P.3 3



### 1570 4 Federa l Register/Vol
. 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s TABL E 

### 1 2 T O SUBPAR T

### EEE E O F PAR T63—APPLICABILITYO F GENERA L PROVISION S T O SUBPAR T

### EEEE—Continue d [As state d i n §63.2398 , yo u must compl ywit h th e applicabl e Genera l Provision s requirement s accordin g t o th e followin g table] : Citatio n Subjec t Brie f descriptio n Applie s t o subpar t EEE E §63.6(h)(7)(v )

§ 63.6(h)(8 ) § 63.6(h)(9 ) §63.6(I)(1H14 ) §63.6 0 §63.7(a)(1H2 ) § 63.7(a)(3 ) § 63.7(b)(1 ) § 63.7(b)(2 ) §63.7(c )
§ 63.7(d ) § 63.7(e)(1 ) § 63.7(e)(2 ) § 63.7(e)(3 ) § 63.7(f ) § 63.7(g ) §63.7(h ) § 63.8(a)(1 ) § 63.8(a)(2 ) § 63.8(a)(3 ) § 63.8(a)(4 ) § 63.8(b)(1 ) §63.8(b)(2H3 )
§ 63.8(c)(1 ) §63.8(c)(1)(i )
. . § 63.8(c)(1)(H )

. §63.8(c)(1)(iii )
§63.8(c)(2)-(3 ) Determinin g Complianc e wit h Opacity/V E Standards

.
Determinin g Complianc e wit h Opacity/V E Standards

. Adjuste d OpacityStandard Complianc e Extensio n Presidentia l Complianc e Exemp
tion

. Performanc e Tes t Date s Sectio n 11 4 Authority Notificatio n o f Performanc e Tes t Notificatio n o f Reschedulin g QualityAssurance/Tes t Pla n

Testin g Facilitie s Condition s fo rConductin g Per
formanc e Tests

. Condition s fo rConductin g Per
formanc e Tests

. Tes t Ru n Duratio n Alternativ e Tes t Metho d Performanc e Tes t Data Analysi s Waive rof Test s Applicabilityo f Monitorin g Re
quirements

. Performanc e Specification s [Reserved ] Monitorin g wit h Flare s Monitorin g Multipl e Effluent s an d Multipl e Monitorin g Systems

.

Monitorin g Syste m Operatio n an d Maintenance

. Routin e an d Predictabl e SS M SS M not i n SS M pla n Complianc e wit h Operatio n an d Maintenanc e Requirements

. Monitorin g Syste m Installatio n COM S i s probabl e bu t not conclusiv e evidenc e o f compli
anc e wit h opacitystandard , eve n i f Metho d 9 observatio n shows otherwise

. Requirement s fo rCOM S t o b e probabl e evidence-prope rmaintenance , meetin g P S 1 , an d dat a have not bee n altered

. Administrato rwil l us e al l COMS , Metho d 9 , an d Metho d 2 2 results , as wel l as infonnatio n abou t operatio n an d main
tenanc e t o determin e compliance

. Procedure s fo rAdministrato rt o adjus t a n opacitystandard

. . Procedure s an d criteri a fo rAdministrato rt o gran t compli
anc e extension

. Presiden t ma

yexemp t an ysourc e from requiremen t t o com pl ywit h subpart

. Date s fo rconductin g initia l performanc e testin g an d othe r date s are complianc e demonstrations ; must containe d i n conduc t 18 0 days afte rfirs t subjec t t o subpart

. Administrato rma

yrequir e a performanc e tes t unde rCA A sectio n 11 4 a t an ytime

. Must notif yAdministrato r6 0 days before th e tes t I f have t o reschedul e performanc e test , must notifyAdminis
trato ro f reschedule d dat e 5 days before schedule d date

. Requiremen t t o submi t site-specifi c6 0 days before th e tes t o ro n dat e Administrato ragree s with ; tes t pla n approva l procedures ; performanc e audi t requirements ; interna l an d externa l QAprocedure s fo rtesting

. Requirement s fo rtestin g facilitie s Performanc e tes t must b e conducte d unde rrepresentativ e conditions ; canno t conduc t performanc e test s durin g SSM ; not a violatio n t o excee d standard durin g SSM

. Must conduc

t accordin g t o subpar

t an d EPAtes t method s unles s Administrato rapproves , alternative

. Must have thre e tes t run s o f a t leas t on e hou reach ; compli
ance i s base d o n arithmeti cmea n o f thre e runs ; condi
tion s whe n dat a fro m a n additiona l tes t ru n ca n b e used

. Procedure s bywhic h Administrato rca n gran t approva l t o us e a n alternativ e tes t method

. Must includ e rawdat a i n performanc e tes t report ; must sub
mi t performanc e tes t dat a 6 0 days afte ren d o f tes t wit h th e notificatio n o f complianc e status ; kee p dat a fo r5 years . Procedure s fo rAdministrato rt o waiv e performanc e tes t Subjec t t o al l monitorin g requirement s i n standar d Performanc e Specification s i n appendi xB of 4 0 CF R par t 6 0 apply

. Unles s thi s subpar

t say s otherwise , th e requirement s fo r flare s i n §63.1 1 apply

. Must conduc

t monitorin g accordin g t o standard unles s Ad
ministrato rapprove s alternative

. Specifi crequirement s fo rinstallin g monitorin g systems ; must instal l o n eac h effluen t before i t i s combine d an d befor e i t i s release d t o th e atmosphere unles s Administrato rap prove s otherwise ; i f mor e tha n on e monitorin g syste m o n a n emissio n point , must repor t al l monitorin g syste m re sults , unles s on e monitorin g syste m i s a backup

. Maintai n monitorin g syste m i n a manne rconsisten t wit h goo d ai rpollutio n contro l practices

. Followth e SS M pla n fo rroutin e repairs ; kee p part s fo rrou tin e repairs readil yavailable ; reportin g requirement s fo r SS M whe n actio n i s describe d i n SS M plan

. Reportin g requirement s fo rSS M whe n actio n i s not de
scribe d i n SS M plan

. Ho wAdministrato rdetermine s i f sourc e complyin g wit h oper atio n an d maintenanc e requirements ; revie wof sourc e O& M procedures , records , manufacturer' s recommenda
tions ; inspections

. Must instal l t o ge t representativ e emissio n o rparamete r measurements ; must verifyoperationa l statu s before o ra t performance test
. No

.

Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. No

. Thes e date s are containe d i n §63.2354

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

.
Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Ye s Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

.

Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

.
Yes

.



# 3 3P.3 4



### Federa l Register/Vol
. 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s 1570 5
TABL E 

### 1 2 T O SUBPAR T

### EEE E O F PAR T63—APPLICABILITYO F GENERA L PROVISION S T O SUBPAR T

### EEEE—Continue d [A s state d i n § 63.2398 , yo u must compl ywit h th e applicabl e Genera l Provision s requirement s accordin g t o th e followin g table] : Citatio n Subject Brie f descriptio n Applie s t o subpar t EEE E § 63.8(c)(4 ) CM S Requirement s

§ 63.8(c)(5 ) §63.8(c)(6H8 ) § 63.8(d) §63.8(e ) §63.8(f)(1H5 ) §63.8(f)(6 ) §63.8(g )
§63.9(a ) §63.9(b)(1H5 )
... . § 63.9(c ) §63.9(d ) §63.9(e ) §63.9( 0 § 63.9(g ) §63.9(h)(1H6 )
... . §63.9(i ) §63.9fl ) §63.10(a ) §63.10(b)(1 ) §63.10(b)(2)(IHv )
§63.10(b)(2)(vi)-(xi ) §63.10(b)(2)(xii ) §63.10(b)(2)(xiii )

... . §63.10(b)(2)(xiv )

... . §63.10(b)(3 ) §63.10(c ) §63.10(d)(1 ) § 63.10(d)(2) §63.10(d)(3 ) § 63.10(d)(4 ) §63.10(d)(5 ) COM S Minimu m Procedure s

CM S Requirement s CM S QualityContro l
CM S Performanc e Evaluatio n Alternativ e Monitorin g Metho d

... . Alternativ e t o Relativ e Accurac y Test

. Dat a Reductio n

Notificatio n Requirement s Initia l Notification s
Reques t fo rComplianc e Exten
sion

. Notificatio n o f Specia l Compli
anc e Requirement s fo rNe w Sources

. Notificatio n o f Performanc e Tes t Notificatio n o f VE/OpacityTes t
.. . Additiona l Notification s Whe n Usin g CMS

. Notificatio n o f Complianc e Statu s
Adjustmen t o f Submitta l Dead
lines

. Chang e i n Previou s Informatio n . . Recordkeeping/Reportin g Recordkeeping/Reportin g Record s Relate d t o Startup , Shutdown , an d Malfunction

. CM S Record s Record s Record s Record s Record s Record s Genera l Reportin g Requirement s Repor t of Performanc e Tes t Re
sults

. Reportin g Opacityo rV E Obser
vations

. Progres s Report s Startup , Shutdown , an d Malfunc
tio n Reports

. CM S must b e operatin g excep t durin g breakdown , out-o f control , repair , maintenance , an d high-leve l calibratio n drifts ; COM S must hav e a minimu m o f on e cycl e o f sam plin g an d analysi s fo reac h successiv e 10-secon d perio d an d on e cycl e o f dat a recordin g fo reac h successiv e 6 - minut e period ; CEM S must have a minimu m o f on e cycl e o f operatio n fo reac h successiv e 15-minut e period

. COM S minimu m procedure s Zero an d hig h leve l calibratio n chec k requirement s Out-of
contro l periods

. Requirement s fo rCM S qualitycontrol , includin g calibration , etc. ; must kee p qualitycontro l pla n o n record fo r5 years ; kee p ol d version s fo r5 years afte rrevisions

. Notification , performanc e evaluatio n tes t plan , report s Procedure s fo rAdministrato rt o approv e alternativ e moni
toring

. Procedure s fo rAdministrato rt o approv e alternativ e relativ e accurac ytest s fo rCEMS

. COM S 6-minut e average s calculate d ove ra t leas t 3 6 evenl y space d dat a points ; CEM S 1 hou raverage s compute d ove rat leas t 4 equall yspace d dat a points ; dat a tha t can no t b e use d i n average . Applicabilityan d Stat e delegatio n Submi t notificatio n withi n 12 0 days afte reffectiv e date ; notifi
catio n o f inten t t o construct/reconstruct , Notificatio n o f commencemen t o f construction/reconstruction , Notificatio n o f startup ; content s o f each

. Ca n reques t i f cannot compl yb ydat e o ri f installe d BACT / LAER

. Fo rsource s that commenc e constructio n betwee n proposa l an d promulgatio n an d wan t t o compl y3 years afte reffec
tiv e date

. Notif yAdministrato r6 0 days prio r Notif yAdministrato r3 0 days prio r Notificatio n o f performanc e evaluation ; notificatio n abou t us e o f COM S data ; Notificatio n tha t exceede d criterio n fo rrel
ativ e accurac

yalternative

. Contents ; du e 6 0 days afte ren d o f performanc e tes t o r othe rcomplianc e demonstration , excep t fo ropacity/VE , whic h are du e 3 0 days after ; whe n t o submi t t o Federa l vs . Stat e authority

. Procedure s fo rAdministrato rt o approv e chang e i n whe n no tification s must b e submitted

. Must submi t withi n 1 5 day s afte rth e chang e Applie s t o all , unles s complianc e extension ; whe n t o submi t t o Federa l vs . Stat e authority ; procedure s fo rowners o f mor e tha n 1 source . Genera l requirements ; kee p al l record s readil yavailable ; kee p fo r5 years . Occunenc e o f eac h fo roperation s (proces s equipment) ; oc currenc e o f eac h malfunctio n o f ai rpollutio n contro l equip
ment ; maintenanc e o n ai rpollutio n contro l equipment ; ac tion s durin g startups , shutdowns , an d malfunctions

. Malfunctions , inoperative , out-of-contro l period s Record s whe n unde rwaive r Record s whe n usin g alternativ e t o relativ e accurac ytes t Al l documentatio n supportin g initia l notificatio n an d notifica
tio n of complianc e status
. Applicabilitydetermination s Additiona l record s fo rCM S Requiremen t t o repor

t Whe n t o submi t t o Federa l o rStat e authority What t o repor

t an d whe n Must submi t progres s report s o n schedul e i f unde rcompli
anc e extension

. Content s an d submissio n Yes

. However , CEMS/ COM S ar e no t appli
cable

.

No

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. No

. Yes

. However , CEMS/ COM S ar e not appli
cable

. Yes

. Yes

.
Yes
. Yes
. Yes

. No
. Yes

. However , ther e ar e n o opacity/V E standards

. Yes

.
Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

.
Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. 

# 3H$#';*?*"." ' P.3 5



### 1570 6 Federa l Register/Vol
. 67 , No
. 63/Tuesday , Apri l 2 , 2002/Propose dRule s TABL E 

### 1 2 T O SUBPAR T

### EEE E O F PAR T63—APPLICABILITYO F GENERA L PROVISION S T O SUBPAR T

### EEEE—Continue d [A s state d i n §63.2398 , yo u must compl ywit h th e applicabl e Genera l Provision s requirement s accordin g t o th e followin g table] : Citatio n §63.10(e)(1H2 )

... . §63.10(e)(3)(iMiii )

§63.10(e)(3)(ivHv )

§63.10(e)(3)(vi)
- (viii)

. § 63.10(e)(4 ) §63.10( 0 §63.1 1 §63.1 2 §63.1 3 §63.1 4 §63.1 5 Subject

Additiona l CM S Report s Report s

Exces s Emission s Report s

Exces s Emission s Repor t an d Summar yReport

. Reportin g COM S dat a Waive rfo rRecordkeeping/Re
porting

. Flare s Delegatio n Addresse s Incorporatio n byReferenc e Availabilityo f Informatio n Brie f descriptio n Must repor

t result s fo reac h CEM S o n a unit ; writte n cop yof CM S performanc e evaluation ; 2- 3 copie s o f COM S per formanc e evaluation

. Schedul e fo rreportin g exces s emission s an d paramete r monito rexceedanc e (no wdefine d a s deviations)

.

Requiremen t t o rever

t t o quarterl ysubmissio n i f ther e i s a n exces s emission s an d paramete rmonito rexceedance s (nowdefine d as deviations) ; provisio n t o reques t semi
annua l reportin g afte rcomplianc e fo r1 year ; submi t repor t by30t h dayfollowin g en d o f quarte ro rcalenda rhalf ; i f there has not bee n a n exceedanc e o rexces s emission s (nowdefine d a s deviations) , repor t content s i n a state men t tha t ther e have bee n n o deviations ; must submi t re por t containin g al l of th e informatio n i n §§63.8(c)(7)-(8 ) an d 63.10(c)(5)-(13)

. Requirement s fo rreportin g exces s emission s fo rCM S (now calle d deviations) ; require s al l o f th e informatio n i n §§63.10(c)(5)-<13 ) an d 63.8(c)(7)-(8)

. Must submi t COM S dat a wit h performanc e tes t dat a Procedure s fo rAdministrato rt o waiv e Requirements fo rflare s Stat e authorityt o enforc e standard s Addresse s where reports , notifications , an d request s are sent
. Publi can d confidentia l informatio n Applie s t o subpar t EEE E Yes

. However , CEMS

/ COM S are no t appli
cable

. Yes

. However , not e that th e titl e o f th e repor t i s th e compli
anc e report , Devi
ation s are exces s emission s o rparam ete rexceedances

. Yes

.

Yes

. N/ A Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

. Yes

.
[F RDoc . 02-709 5 File d 4-1-02 ; 8:4 5 am ] BILLIN G COD E 6560-50- P



# 3Z3