alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States

Department of

Agriculture

Agricultural

Marketing Service

Washington, DC

20250

Secure Your Certificate Then Ship

Notice for Exporters

January 6, 2014

The Agricultural Marketing Service‐Livestock, Poultry and Seed (LPS) must reiterate that all European

Union countries and many other countries require export certificates to be dated prior to shipment. The

exporter is responsible for requesting certificates to comply with this requirement. As stated per

instructions, certificates may require up to 5 business days for processing.

Due to this requirement, USDA‐AMS‐LPS Program must deny requests that are submitted after the

departure date or submitted with insufficient time to review and process prior to the date of departure

from the United States. In order to facilitate certificate issuance, exporters are encouraged to take the

following steps:  

1. Request the health certificate as soon as the consignment specific information is available. The EU has

accepted amended certificates as long as the original certificate was dated prior to the date of

departure from the United States.  

*Note: AMS will charge an administrative fee of one hour at the current Federal Register published rate

for LPS Program services for each export certificate. As of January 1, 2014, the rate is $108.00 per

certificate. There is an additional $108.00 charge for any amended certificate.
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
FalconTarget, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

FalconTarget, Inc.

Date: February 13, 2009

By:   /s/   Thomas Kirchner

Thomas Kirchner

Chief Executive Officer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2004094EN.01004402.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/44

---

Action brought on 29 December 2003 by Ulrike Eppe against European Parliament

(Case T-439/03)

(2004/C 94/126)

Language of the case: German

An action against the European Parliament was brought against the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 29 December 2003 by Ulrike Eppe, residing in Hanover (Germany), represented by D. Rogalla, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the defendant's decisions of 24 February 2003, 28 April 2003 and 17 September 2003; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the defendant's decisions of 24 February 2003, 28 April 2003 and 17 September 2003;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The pleas in law and arguments are similar to those raised in Case T-412/03 (Wille v Parliament, not yet published).

Wille

Parliament

---
BE Salmon Summary

BE Salmon Events in the Food Supply

BE Event Trait Producing Countries Comments FDA Review

EO-1α growth rate Canada, U.S. Trade name: 

AquAdvantageTM YES

BE Salmon Production

BE salmon is currently produced in Canada and the U.S. (Indiana) . 

AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. received approval from the FDA to produce BE salmon at a facility in 

Indiana (FDA, 2018). Salmon eggs are shipped from Canada to Indiana for grow-out to market size.

BE Salmon Food Safety Reviews

BE salmon has been approved for food use by the FDA in the United States (FDA, 2015) and by Health 

Canada and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency in Canada (Health Canada, 2016). As part of its 

approval, FDA determined that the salmon is as safe for consumption as its non-engineered counterpart.

References

FDA (2015) FDA Has Determined That the AquAdvantage Salmon is as Safe to Eat as Non-GE Salmon

FDA (2017) AquAdvantage Salmon Fact Sheet

FDA (2018) FDA Approves Application for AquaBounty Salmon Facility in Indiana

Health Canada (2016) Health Canada and Canadian Food Inspection Agency approve AquAdvantage 

Salmon
Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) Monthly Inventory Report

As of October 31, 2021

(Million Units Except as Noted)

CCC Commodity 

Unit of 

Measure

Outstanding

Under Loan

CY 2019

Outstanding

Under Loan

CY 2020

Outstanding

Under Loan

CY 2021

CCC-Owned 

Inventory

(Actual Units)

Butter Pounds - - - -

Cheese Pounds - - - -

Nonfat Dry Milk Pounds - - - -

Barley Bushels 0.0 0.6 1.1 0.0 

Corn Bushels 1.2 25.2 46.7 0.0 

Oats Bushels 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 

Sorghum Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 

Soybeans Bushels 0.1 4.4

 

13.6 0.0 

Wheat Bushels 0.0 3.6 9.8 0.0 

Rice Cwt. 0.0 0.8 14.9 0.0 

Refined Sugar Pounds 0.0 55.0 211.5 0.0 

 In-process Beet Pounds 0.0 0.0 305.0 0.0 

Raw Cane Sugar Pounds 0.0 0.0 124.1 0.0 

 In-process Cane Pounds - - - -

Honey Pounds 0.0 2.6 1.4 0.0 

Peanuts

Tons (not 

millions) 0.0 52,950.0 377,750.0 0.0 

Canola Seed* Cwt. 8.0 1.0 33.0 0.0 

Crambe* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Flaxseed* Cwt. 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 

Mustard Seed* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Rapeseed* Cwt. - - - -

Safflower Seed* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Sesame Seed* Cwt. - - - -

Sunflower Seed (Oil)* Cwt. 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 

Sunflower Seed (Other)* Cwt. 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 

Dry Peas* Cwt. 0.0 165.0 59.0 0.0 

Lentils* Cwt. 0.0 33.0 2.0 0.0 

Chickpeas* Cwt. 0.0 67.0 3.0 0.0 

Upland Cotton

1,000 

Running 

Bales 100 68,300 517,800 0 

ELS Cotton

1,000 

Running 

Bales 0 5,100

 

12,800 0
Notes: 

• *Minor Oilseeds & Pulses are in thousand units.

• CCC acquired 2019 Crop Year Upland (if not specified) and ELS cotton as a result of the 

following months' forfeited Marketing Assistance Loans:

o 12 bales from August 2020; 59 bales from September 2020; 120 bales from October

2020; 135 Upland and 351 ELS bales from November 2020; 876 Upland and 18 ELS 

bales from December 2020; 48 bales from January 2021; and 18 bales from March 2021 

maturing loans. 

o There were multiple invitations that sold 12 bales in September; 59 bales in October; 77 

bales in November; 70 Upland bales and 351 ELS bales in December; 984 Upland bales 

and 18 ELS bales in January; 35 bales in March; 520 bales in April; 192 bales in May;

130 bales in June; and 2 bales in July.

o In total, there were 0 bales of cotton in inventory on October 31, 2021.

• CCC also acquired 2019 Crop Year peanuts as a result of the following months' forfeited 

Marketing Assistance Loans:

o 20.55 tons from September 2020, 39.77 tons from October 2020, and 7.19 tons from 

January 2021. 

o Total CCC peanut forfeitures for Crop Year 2019 were 67.51 tons. CCC sold 20.55 tons 

from Invitation 20, 39.77 tons from Invitation 21, and 7.19 tons from Invitation 22. 

o In total, there were 0.00 tons of peanuts in inventory as of October 31, 2021.

Report Completed: December 1, 2021.
#### Dunn et al., Executors, Appellants, *v.*Tisch.

*Negotiable instruments■*— Promissory *notes*— Insufficient *evidence —Nonsuit.*

In an action on an instrument reading “Deceived of (plaintiff’s decedent) 47 shares of Lehigh Bleaching and Dyeing stock, par value $100 per share, -which I .agree to return or pay for the sum of four thousand dollars on or before the 27th of April, 1914. Less the reduction of note which I hold,” where plaintiff offered the note in evidence and rested, the trial judge properly entered a compulsory nonsuit, as it was clear that there was no indebtedness of $4,000 owing from the defendant to the plaintiff, no evidence having been produced by which the court could ascertain what would be a just verdict against the defendant.

Submitted May 29, 1918.

July 17, 1918:

Appeal, No. 88, Jan. T., 1918, by plaintiffs, from order of C. P. Luzerne Co., June T., 1916, No. 127, refusing to take off nonsuit, in case of Joseph L. Dunn and Newton R. Turner, Executors of the Estate of Thomas A. Dunn, Deceased, v. Louis Tisch.

Before Brown, C. J., Moschzisker, Frazer and Walling, JJ.

Affirmed.

Assumpsit on a promissory note. Before Strauss, J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts.

The court entered a compulsory nonsuit, which it subsequently refused to take off. Plaintiffs appealed.

*Error assigned*was in refusing to take off nonsuit.

*M. J. Mulhall,*for appellants.

*John T. Lenahan*and *Chas. B. Lenahan}*for appellee.

Per Curiam,

The plaintiffs rested after offering in evidence the written instrument upon which they brought their action. It was in the following form: “Allentown, Pa., *216April 16, 1914. Received of Thomas A. Dunn forty-seven shares of Lehigh Bleaching and Dyeing stock, par value $100 per share, which I agree to return or pay for, the sum of four thousand dollars on or before the 27th of April, 1914. Less the reduction of note which I hold. [Signed] Louis Tisch.” With nothing more before the jury the learned trial judge properly said: “The motion for a nonsuit is sustained, because the contract produced by plaintiffs, upon which the claim is based, shows a possible indebtedness against the defendant, but based upon the four thousand, less a certain note held by the defendant. The plaintiff is dead, the defendant’s mouth is sealed. It is evident from the paper that there was no indebtedness of four thousand dollars owing from the defendant to the plaintiff under any circumstances, and as there is no evidence produced by which the court can ascertain what would be a just verdict against this defendant, the nonsuit is sustained.”

Judgment affirmed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 25, 2014.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 25, 2014

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0125. NEVILLE C. TURNBULL v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2010CR09954
ISACKSON, WALLACE & PFEIFER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 114 S. SECOND AVENUE ALPENA, MICHIGAN 49707 (989) 354-8242 FAX (989) 356-3369 KEITH WALLACE WILLIAMA. PFEIFER NANCY A. WARD DYLANJ. WALLACE ISADORE ISACKSON (1901-1988)

Mr. Dennis DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office of Aviation Analysis ·· · DepartmentofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590 June 4, 2012

l L7

Reference; DOT-OST-2009-0300, Alpena, Michigan Air Service Dear Mr. DeVany: Isackson, Wallace & Pfeifer, P.C., in Alpena, Michigan wishes to lend its supportto the proposal ofSkyWestAirlines to provide essential air service atAlpena, Michigan as replacementfor our current airservice. Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international air transportation system is critical to the economic well being of Alpena, Michigan and to Isackson, Wallace & Pfeifer, P.C. ofAlpena, Michigan. We at Isackson, Wallace & Pfeifer, P.C. rely on our local air service for both business and leisure travel. The SkyWest proposal offers us a50-seat regional jetwith the Delta brand and code and service to the Delta hubs of Detroit andMinneapolis. We believe the SkyWest air service proposal representsthebestoption for retaining our local air service long term and building up traffic so that government subsidies can eventually be reduced oreliminated. We urge the Department ofTransportation to award SkyWestAirways the designation to provide Alpena's Essential Air Service. Sincerely, ISACKSON, WALLACE & PFEIFER, P.C.

KEITH WALLACE, Attorney at Law 1-<W/jmk
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of True North Energy Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John
      Folnovic, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that;





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/
              John
              FolnovicName:
              John FolnovicTitle:
                Principal Executive OfficerDate:
              September 14, 2006
Exhibit 32.0   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kearny Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John N. Hopkins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
     Date: November 9, 2009
        
        /s/ John N. HopkinsJohn N. HopkinsPresident and Chief Executive Officer
   
  Exhibit 32.0   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kearny Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William C. Ledgerwood, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
     Date: November 9, 2009
        
        /s/ William C. LedgerwoodWilliam C. LedgerwoodSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
# C_2004094EN.01005002.xml

| 17.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/50

---

Action brought on 11 February 2004 by Marie Tzirani against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-45/04)

(2004/C 94/137)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 11 February 2004 by Marie Tzirani, residing in Brussels, represented by E. Boigelot, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the Commission's decision of 11 February 2003 to reject the applicant's candidature for the A2 post of Director of the ‘Staff Regulations: policy, management and advisory services’ Directorate; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission's decision of 11 February 2003 to reject the applicant's candidature for the A2 post of Director of the ‘Staff Regulations: policy, management and advisory services’ Directorate;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs, pursuant to Article 87(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs, pursuant to Article 87(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

The applicant in this case challenges the Commission's refusal to accept her candidature for the A2 post of Director of the ‘Staff Regulations: policy, management and advisory services’ Directorate.

In support of her claims, she alleges:

| — | infringement of Articles 7, 14, 29(1)(a) and 45 of the Staff Regulations and of the rules for nominating officials to grades A1 and A2; |
| --- | --- |

—

infringement of Articles 7, 14, 29(1)(a) and 45 of the Staff Regulations and of the rules for nominating officials to grades A1 and A2;

| — | misuse of powers in the present case; |
| --- | --- |

—

misuse of powers in the present case;

| — | a manifest error of assessment by the Appointing Authority; |
| --- | --- |

—

a manifest error of assessment by the Appointing Authority;

| — | failure to observe the principles of legality, entitlement to reasonable career prospects and equal treatment for men and women. |
| --- | --- |

—

failure to observe the principles of legality, entitlement to reasonable career prospects and equal treatment for men and women.

The applicant emphasises in particular the appropriateness of her professional profile for the post in question, as described in the vacancy notice, in contrast to that of the person finally appointed, who can invoke only one experience of working in a cabinet.

---
**
Exhibit 31.1 

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function 

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)

**CERTIFICATION**

I, KevinJ. Cullum, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2022-A Owner Trust(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. I amresponsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank National Association and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association 

Date: June 29, 2023 

 
By: 
/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
 Kevin J. Cullum President and Chief Executive Officer of Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)**
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Securities Exchange, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2005 (the Report), I, David Krell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Bruce Cooperman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |        |  |                                      
|------------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: May 16, 2005 |  | By:    |  | /s/ David Krell                      
|                    |  | Name:  |  | David Krell                          
|                    |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
|                    |  |       
|                    |  | By:    |  | /s/ Bruce Cooperman                  
|                    |  | Name:  |  | Bruce Cooperman                      
|                    |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer              



31