alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of GlobalOptions Group, Inc., (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Jeffrey O. Nyweide, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




November
      14, 2006




/s/
      Jeffrey O. Nyweide


Jeffrey
      O. Nyweide


Chief
      Financial Officer, Executive Vice President,


Corporate
      Development and Secretary (Principal


Financial
      Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
#### Matthew Edward HAWRYLUK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 88-2145.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 1, 1989.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Larry B. Henderson, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Kellie A. Nielan and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Asst. Attys. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a guideline sentence. Because the sentencing judge did not render contemporaneous written reasons justifying the departure-from-the-guidelines sentence we must vacate the sentence and remand for proper resentenc-ing. *State v. Oden,*478 So.2d 51 (Fla.1985). We have been told that the sentencing judge rendered written reasons over three months after the pronouncement of the sentence. This was ineffectual because this court, not the trial court, had jurisdiction of the case by that time, due to the filing of the notice of appeal.

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

ORFINGER and COBB, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 72 (Friday, April 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 22311]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8958]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL12-51-000]


Southwest Power Pool, Inc.; Notice of Initiation of Proceeding 
and Refund Effective Date

    On April 6, 2012, the Commission issued an order that initiated a 
proceeding in Docket No. EL12-51-000, pursuant to section 206 of the 
Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e (2006), to determine the 
justness and reasonableness of the proposed rate reduction by Southwest 
Power Pool, Inc. Southwest Power Pool, Inc., 139 FERC ] 61,016 (2012).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL12-51-000, established 
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication 
of this notice in the Federal Register.

    Dated: April 6, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8958 Filed 4-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Fruit & Specialty Crops 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.

Vegetable Inspection Room 1536-S, STOP 0240

Program Division Washington, DC 20250-0240

August 13, 2015 

 

AMENDMENT NO. 3

COMMODITY SPECIFICATION

CANNED VEGETABLES DATED SEPTEMBER 2014

The purpose of this amendment is to change the packing medium allowed for canned sweet 

potatoes:

N. Sweet Potatoes – 6/10 size can & 24/300 size can 

1. Grade - U.S. Grade A. 

2. Color Type – Golden, Yellow, Mixed. 

3. Type of Pack –

a. Regular – Liquid packing medium is added. 

b. Solid pack sweet potatoes of the “mashed” style only, no packing medium may be added 

(6/10 size). 

4. Style –

a. 6/10 size – Whole, Halved, Pieces/cuts, or mashed (as applicable). 

b. 24/300 size – Whole or pieces/cuts style. 

5. Liquid packing medium –Light Sucrose or other FDA approved syrups. Brix measurements 

must be 18 degrees or more, but less than 25 degrees.

6. The styles for canned sweet potato except mashed, may be whole, halved, pieces/cuts, or any 

combination thereof, provided that 90 percent (by count) of each of the sweet potato units 

weigh no more than three ounces. No sweet potato unit may weigh more than four ounce.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

 Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF COTTON

FOR RELEASE AT 12 PM CT November 14, 2023

U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of cotton. The cotton bales were 

sold on The Seam dated November 13, 2023.

Offer No. Catalog Location Pounds

Sold

Bales 

Sold

Price Sold 

(per pound) CCC Revenue

TS1155868 AR 511 1 $0.4120 $210.53

TS1155869 AL, AR, MO, MS, NC, & TN 16,423 34 $0.2111 $3,466.91
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 30, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-10953 Summary Calendar

GREGORY D. ROWE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MENTAL HEALTH MENTAL RETARDATION, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CV-193-A

-------------------- Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Gregory D. Rowe moves this court for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") in this appeal from the district court's dismissal of his discrimination suit for failure to prosecute. Rowe failed to pay the filing fee after the district court determined that he should not be granted IFP status because Rowe had abused the IFP process by providing inconsistent information in his IFP declarations and filing frivolous suits in the past.No. 04-10953 -2- Rowe's motion for IFP fails to address the district court's rationale for dismissing the suit. Although this court liberally
construes pro se briefs, see Haines v. Kerner , 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972), even pro se litigants must brief arguments in order to preserve them. Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). By failing to discuss the district court's rationale for dismissing his complaint, Rowe has abandoned the issue, and it is the same as if he had not appealed the judgment. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Because Rowe has failed to demonstrate that he will raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal, his motion to proceed IFP is denied. See F ED . R. A PP . P. 24(a); Carson v. Polley , 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). The appeal is without merit and is dismissed as frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. MOTION FOR IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BLACKWATER MIDSTREAM CORP. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Donald St. Pierre, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 14, 2008


                               By:   /s/ Donald St. Pierre
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Donald St. Pierre, Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**  I, W. Carl Whitmer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IASIS Healthcare LLC;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:February 14, 2008                                                                          /s/ W. Carl Whitmer   W. Carl Whitmer   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report of Southport Acquisition Corporation
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”), I, Jeb Spencer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: March 31, 2022 |     |                                                              
|-------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |     |                                                              
|                     | By: | /s/ Jeb Spencer                                              
|                     |     | Jeb Spencer                                                  
|                     |     | Chief Executive Officer                                      
|                     |     | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) Monthly Inventory Report 

As of June 30, 2022 

(Million Units Except as Noted) 

CCC Commodity 

Unit of 

Measure 

Outstanding

Under Loan 

CY 2020 

Outstanding

Under Loan 

CY 2021 

Outstanding

Under Loan 

CY 2022 

CCC-Owned 

Inventory

(Actual Units) 

Butter Pounds - - - -

Cheese Pounds - - - -

Nonfat Dry Milk Pounds - - - -

Barley Bushels 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 

Corn Bushels 0.1 151.3 0.0 0.0 

Oats Bushels 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 

Sorghum Cwt. 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 

Soybeans Bushels 0.0 21.7 0.0 0.0 

Wheat Bushels 0.1 1.6 1.0 0.0 

Rice Cwt. 0.0 8.7 0.0 0.0 

Refined Sugar Pounds 0.0 543.7 0.0 0.0 

 In-process Beet Pounds 0.0 648.0 0.0 0.0 

Raw Cane Sugar Pounds 0.0 858.5 0.0 0.0 

 In-process Cane Pounds - - - -

Honey Pounds 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 

Peanuts 

Tons (not 

millions) 50.0 891,350.0 0.0 0.0 

Canola Seed* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Crambe* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Flaxseed* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Mustard Seed* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Rapeseed* Cwt. - - - -

Safflower Seed* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Sesame Seed* Cwt. - - - -

Sunflower Seed (Oil)* Cwt. 0.0 76.0 0.0 0.0 

Sunflower Seed (Other)* Cwt. 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 

Dry Peas* Cwt. 4.0 56.0 0.0 0.0 

Lentils* Cwt. 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 

Chickpeas* Cwt. 17.0 19.0 0.0 0.0 

Upland Cotton 

1,000 

Running 

Bales 0.0 738.7 0.0 0 

ELS Cotton 

1,000 

Running 

Bales 0.0 34.4 0.0 0 
Notes: 

 *Minor Oilseeds & Pulses are in thousand units. 

 CCC acquired 2020 Crop Year Upland (if not specified) and ELS cotton because of the following 

months' forfeited Marketing Assistance Loans: 

o 22 bales from November 2021, 85 bales from December 2021, 87 bales from January and 

20 bales from February 2022. 

o Invitations sold all 22 bales in November, 85 bales in December, 87 bales in January and 

20 bales in February 2022. 

o In total, there were 0 bales of cotton in inventory as of June 30, 2022. 

Report Completed: July 25, 2022.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Abington Community Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Robert W. White, Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Company.


                                               /s/ Robert W. White
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Robert W. White
                                               Chairman, President and
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               August 15, 2005



        A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ABINGTON COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC. AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY ABINGTON COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Thomas Kirchner, certify that: 

  1) I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-QSB of INverso Corp.;  

  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;  

  3) Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;  

  4) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  

  a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based upon such evaluation; and  

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and  

  5) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):  

  a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information and 

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: February 15, 2006

By:   /s/   Thomas Kirchner 

    Thomas Kirchner

    Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SEAN SEXTON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 549 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of April, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
^:•pA^;liviF^^ 01 - Februar y11,201 2 i'iAKSPORTATlO K ':;:j:VlOPERS'!GN S Docke t Managemen t Facilit y';^\ j ^E C l b P '' •''^

^ U S Departmen t o fTransportatio n Docke t No . FAA-2012-008 9 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenu e S A Wes t Buildin g Gran d Floor . Roo m W-12014 0 Washinuton , D C 2059 0

/ T o who m i t ma yconcern : Thi s lette ri s i n referenc e t o Su n Countr yslo texemptio n Docke tNo . FAA-2012-0089 . 1 a m expressin g m ysuppor t fo rth e continue d servic e o fSu n Countr yairline s betwee n Lansing , M I an d Washington , DC . Th e non-stop , dail yflight s betwee n Washingto n Reaga n Nationa l (DCA ) airpor t an d Lansing' s Capita l Regio n Internationa l (LAN ) airpor tar e importan ti n contributin g t o th e busines s an d economi cgrowt h i n th e Greate rMid-Michigan/Lansin g are a A tpresent , thi s i s th e onl ylarg e aircraf t servic e tha t flie s t o Washingto n Reaga n Nationa l airpor tfro m her e i n Michigan , outsid e o fDetroit . Th e LAN-DC Aai rservic e provide d b ySu n Countr yha s bee n successful . Moreover , i t i s o fgrea t benefi tt o th e consumers , a s i tallow s the m t o sav e million s o f dollar s i n airfar e Thi s exemptio n t o Su n Countr yairline s wil l no tadversel yaffec tsafety . Su n Countr yha s bee n providin g a saf e servic e i n an d ou t o fDCA . Thi s exemptio n merel yallow s Su n Countr yt o continu e operatin g it s existin g saf e servic e fro m LA N t o DC Aan d DC At o LAN . Sincerely , - - —- Mar yDaw n Cel? z
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134538 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices v SC: 134538 

 COA: 277908 

Kent CC: 05-001539-FH 

JEAN PIERRE COMPEAU, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 12, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would remand this case for resentencing. 

t1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2007 

 Clerk
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30030 Summary Calendar

CLARENCE STEWART, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Middle District of Louisiana

(96-3431-A-1)

August 25, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

POLITZ, Chief Judge: *

Clarence Stewart, Jr., a Louisiana prisoner, filed a civil rights complain t

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Louisiana Department of Corrections, Warden

Burl Cain, Lt. Willie Thomas, and Sgt. Gerald Scott, alleging that they refused to1 See Fed.R.App.P. 4(c).

2 Robins v. Maggio , 750 F.2d 405 (5th Cir. 1985).

2 retriev e his radio from another inmate who had stolen it, ignored his request for

emergency medical assistance, and wrote him up for “unsanitary practice” after the

other inmate threw human waste on him. The district court dismissed the

complaint on two grounds: (1) failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and

(2) frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e).

The judgment of dismissal was entered November 5, 1996. Stewart’s notice

of appeal was filed December 16, 1996. The record is devoid of any explanation

or proof why the notice of appeal, which was f iled well outside the 30 days

allowed, should be deemed timely. 1 The time limitation for filing a notice of

appeal is jurisdictional, and the lack of a timely notice mandates our dismissal of

the appeal. 2

By virtue of this dispositi on, the motions filed by Stewart are mooted and

they are DENIED.

APPEAL DISMISSED.