SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST ( In accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V)

SIP Submitted by: District Department of the Environment

Date Received: June 9, 2014 Subject: District of Columbia’s Infrastructure SIP Re vision for the 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality

Standard (NAAQS)

Completeness Review Completed by: Emlyn Vélez

- Rosa Date Completed: J une 1 7 , 201 4

Administrative Materials

ACCEPTABL E

EPA REQUIREMEN T STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision

thereof. 1. A letter dated June 6, 2014 from Keith A. Anderson

, Director of the District Department of the Enviro nment ( DDo E) to Shawn M. Garvin, EPA Regional Administrator. X

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, or consent agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date. Check to see if the regulation, permit, order or consent decree has a sunset or expiration date. If so it is not acceptable as a

SIP su bmission. 2

. Not a regulatory change, however applicable portions of

section 110(a)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) are adopted in Maryland State Implementation Plan ( SIP ) under 40 CFR Part 52 Subpart J

. X

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the plan. 3. The District of Columbia (the District) has the authority
pursuant to the District of Columbia Ai r Pollution Control Act

of 1984

. X

4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including 4. State regulations have been previously adopted and are being cert ified or referenced in the submittal. XEPA REQUIREMEN T STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the

appr opriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself.

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. 5. T he submittal l etter dated June 6, 2014 confirms that all required administrative procedures were properly followed for

this SIP revision. A copy of public hearing notice and transcript were included. X

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change consistent with proc edures approved by EPA, including the date of publication of such notice. 6. Copy of notice of public hearing as published on the DDo E

website on April 18, 2014 , requesting both public written and oral comments by May 19, 2014

. X

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with the information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 7. The public hearing was held on May 19 , 201 4 in accordance with information provided in notice. A hearing o fficer’s certification for the public hearing was p rovided. X

8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response

thereto. 8. No public comments were received at the hearing or during the comment period. X

Technical Materials

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. Nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ), specifically the 2010 NO 2 N ational Ambient Air Quality Standard (N AAQS ) X

2. Identificati on of the locations of affected sources including the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). 2. Most of the State regulations certified or referenced in the

SIP submittal a pply statewide. X

3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current 3. Not applicable. The SIP revision addresses necessary elements for implementation of the 2010 NO 2 N AAQS. This XEPA REQUIREMEN T STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emissions from a ffected sources through calculations of the differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result

of the revision. SIP submittal does not relate to modification of existing

emission limits.

4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demons tration, and visibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. 4. The SIP revision addresses necessary elements for implementation of the 20 10 NO 2 NAAQS. The SIP revision submittal certifies existing air pollution control programs in the District’s SIP, as provided in 40 CFR Part 52 Subpart J. X

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, just ification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis. 5. Not applicable. No modeling required to support SIP

revision. X

6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology. 6

. The SIP revision addresses necessary elements for implementation of the 2010 NO 2 NAAQS. The SIP revision

submittal certifies that the D istrict has adopt ed control

me asures and emission limitations for NO 2 in the SIP, as provided in 4 0 CFR Part 52 Subpart J

. X

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary, to ens ure emission levels. 7. The SIP revision addresses necessary elements for implementation of the 2010 NO 2 NAAQS. The SIP revision submittal certifies that the District has adopted control

measures and emission limitations for NO 2 in the SIP, as provided i n 40 CFR Part 52 Subpart J. X

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how 8

. The SIP revision addresses necessary elements for XEPA REQUIREMEN T STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

compliance will be determined in practice. implementation of the 2010 NO 2 NAAQS. The SIP revision

submittal certifies that the District has adopted

c ompliance/enforcement measures for NO 2 in the SIP, as provided in 40 CFR Part 52 Subpart J.

9. Special economic and technological justifications required by any applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate,

e xplain why.) 9. No t applicable. No special justifications are required. X

10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation. 10. Not a pplicable. N ot a Section 107 request. X