alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PCA : 12-3J14-24-B-0268 

PURCHASE AWARD DESCRIPTION 

February 26, 2024 15:45:00 

Buttery Spread PCA, 12-3J14-24-B-0268 WBSCM Number 2000009923 

The USDA/Agricultural Marketing Service/Commodity Procurement Program (CPP) 

hereby announces the award of solicitation 12-3J14-24-B-0268 WBSCM Number 2000009923. The following 

commodities were purchased in support of Child Nutrition and other related Domestic Food Distribution 

Programs. Deliveries are to be made from April 1, 2024 through June 30, 2024. 

The Contracting Officer will not consider any additional or further offers under solicitation 12-3J14-24-

B-0268 WBSCM Number 2000009923. CPP extends our appreciation to all bidders for showing an interest in 

supplying agricultural commodities for USDA/Domestic Programs. 

Further information can be obtained from the Commodity Procurement Program, Agricultural Marketing 

Service, USDA, South Building, Washington, DC 20250, telephone (202) 720 4517 or the website at http: 

//www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food. 

Number of Offers/Quotes(Vendor Responses) received: 1 

PURCHASE SUMMARY 

Material Total Qty UOM Price Range Total Dollars 

BUTTERY SPREAD LIGHT TUBS-12/15 74,520.000 LB $2.3200 - $2.3200 $ 

OZ 172,886.40 

TOTAL 74,520.000 LB $ 172,886.40 

PURCHASE DETAILS 

Contractor/ Material Plant Bid Inv. Destination Quantity UOM Price 

Contract Number Location Item 

CONAGRA BRANDS, INC. 

222 Merchandise Mart Plz 

Ste 1300 

Chicago, IL 60654-1010 

12-3J14-24-C-1172 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 

4100029512 

BUTTERY SPREAD LIGHT TUBS-12/15 OZ 

40 Kansas City, 37,260.000LB $ 

MO 2.3200 

50 Kansas City, 37,260.000LB $ 

MO 2.3200 

Subtotal 74,520.000LB 

Contract Total 74,520.000LB $ 172,886.40 

Contractor Total 74,520.000 LB $ 172,886.40
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2019 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2021-3, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





1. CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





2. The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.





3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on July 28, 2021 and ending on February 28, 2022 and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.








Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 27th day of May, 2022.





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Andrew J. McMonigle


Andrew J. McMonigle


Vice President and Treasurer
**
Exhibit 35.1 

Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC 

**NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE COMPANY LLC**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

The undersigned, Kevin J. Cullum, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE COMPANY LLC, a Delaware limited liabilitycompany (successor by conversion to Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such officer, as follows: 

(1) The undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2021, as amended and assupplemented by the 2021-A Series Servicing Supplement, dated as of October 26, 2021 (as amended and supplemented, the “Agreement”), by and among Nissan-Infiniti LT LLC, as titling company, NILTLLC, and the Company, as servicer, to be conducted under his supervision; and 

(2) To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, basedupon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forpublicly-issued asset-backed securities. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 29th day of June, 2023. 

 

/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 
21 

**
A-A-20122B

September 12, 2016

COMMERCIAL ITEM DESCRIPTION 

JUICE, LIME, FROZEN

This cancellation was approved by 

the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Commercial Item Description A-A-20122B, Juice, Lime, Frozen dated May 1, 1998, is hereby 

canceled due to the contents being incorporated into Commercial Item Description A-A-20144C, 

Juice, Lemon and Juice, Lime dated August 15, 2016,

Preparing Activity: 

USDA - SCP 

FSC 8915

METRIC NOTICE OF 

CANCELLATION
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 302 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial
reporting.
  By:/s/ James A. CalderJames A. CalderChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial andAccounting Officer)
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 10/28/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

ROGER LEE PARKER,

Petitioner,

v.

BOB GUZIK and UNITED STATES

PAROLE COMMISSION,

Respondents.

No. 96-6062

(D.C. No. CIV-95-1955-R)

(W. Dist. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, KELLY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Roger Lee Parker, a federal prisoner, filed this pro se habeas corpus
-2-

petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 alleging that a parole violator warrant was

improperly issued and that his original sentence was illegally altered. The matter

was referred to a magistrate judge, who recommended that Mr. Parker’s petition

be denied for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The district court

adopted the report and recommendation in its entirety on the basis of Mr. Parker’s

failure to object to it.

On appeal, Mr Parker asserts that even though he informed the court of his

change of address, the report was sent to his old address. A review of the district

court docket sheet reveals that Mr. Parker’s change-of-address notice and the

report crossed in the mail, and that he did not receive the report in time to make

timely objections to it. While this court has a firm waiver rule under which the

failure to make timely objection to the magistrate’s findings or recommendation

waives appellate review of both legal and factual issues, we need not apply the

rule when the interests of justice dictate. See Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d

656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991). We believe the interests-of-justice exception is

applicable here, and accordingly we turn to Mr. Parker’s other argument on

appeal

Mr. Parker contends he offered evidence in the form of his belated written

objections and the attachments thereto that he had in fact exhausted his

administrative remedies and that the magistrate judge therefore improperly
-3-

recommended dismissal of his petition. However, the record on appeal does not

contain the material upon which Mr. Parker relies, and the district court docket

sheet does not show that it was ever filed. Moreover, in his petition in district

court, Mr. Parker stated that he did not exhaust his administrative remedies

because administrative relief does not apply in this case. He does not make that

argument on appeal, contending only that he has in fact exhausted. Because he

has failed to establish that he has done so, however, we affirm the dismissal of his

petition.

AFFIRMED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Stephanie K. Seymour

Chief Judge
Virtual - December 15-16, 2021

All times reflect Eastern Standard Time

Grain Inspection Advisory Committee (GIAC)

Wednesday   December 

11:00 am Call to Order and Welcome Matthew Kerrigan, GIAC Chair Person

11:10 am Greetings Bruce Summers, AMS Administrator

11:20 am FGIS Program Updates Arthur Neal, FGIS Deputy Administrator

Denise Ruggles, Executive Program Analyst

Karla Whalen, Director, Quality Assurance and Compliance Division

Anthony Goodeman, Director, Field Management Division

Byron Reilly, Director, International Affairs Division

Dr. Ed Jhee, Director, Technology and Science Division

1:00 pm Lunch

2:00 pm Presentation: AMS Ag Transportation Analysis and 

Data Visualization Platform

AMS Transportation and Marketing Program

2:30 pm Discuss Industry Issues: GIAC

• FGIS Proposed Technology Review Process

• Average Inspection Flexibilities

3:45 pm Public Comments

(If allotted time is not fully utilized, the GIAC will resume the agenda after the last public comment)

4:30 pm Wrap-up Discussions on Industry Issues GIAC

5:00 pm Adjourn Matthew Kerrigan
Thursday   December 

11:00 am Call to Order Matthew Kerrigan

11:15 am FGIS-FDA MOU Discussion Nick Friant, Subcommittee Chair

12:30 pm Public Comments

(If allotted time is not fully utilized, the GIAC will resume the agenda after the last public comment)

1:15 pm Lunch

2:15 pm Discuss Recommendations Matthew Kerrigan

3:45 pm Break

4:00 pm Finalize Recommendations Matthew Kerrigan

4:30 pm Discuss Agenda Items for Next Meeting Matthew Kerrigan

4:45 pm Closing Remarks Arthur Neal

Matthew Kerrigan

5:00 pm Meeting Adjourns

GIAC Me
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 18, 2022

NO. 03-22-00495-CV

Ali Faris, Appellant

v.

Travis Park, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on June 21, 2022. Having reviewed 

the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay 

costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        ) may be relied upon as “of record” notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at 
                        *www.fdic.gov/​bank/​individual/​failed/​banklist.html*
                         or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center. Dated: April 2, 2012. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Pamela Johnson, Regulatory Editing Specialist.
 Institutions in Liquidation
[In alphabetical order]
FDIC Ref. No.
Bank name
City
State
Date closed10432
Fidelity Bank
Dearborn
MI
3/30/2012


[FR Doc. 2012-8435 Filed 4-6-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
U. S. Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF COTTON

FOR RELEASE AT 4:00 P.M. CT November 26, 2019

USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of Cotton. The cotton bales were sold under 

Invitation 2020U0004 dated November 25, 2019.

Invitation 2020U0004

Catalog Lot No. Catalog Location Purchaser Pounds 

Sold 

Price Sold (per 

Pound) CCC Revenue 

27 EL CAMPO, TX ECOM USA 4,703 0.3699 $ 1,716.12 

4,703 $ 1,716.12
BMVIT -IV/L 1 (Strategie und lntematlonales) 

Postanschrift:: Postfach 201, 1000 Wien 

BUroanschrift: RadetzkystraBe 2 , 1030 Wren 

E~Mail: 11@bmvit.gv.at 

Internet: www.bmvit.gv.at 

(Antwort bitte unter AnfOhrung der GZ. 

an die eben angefUhrte E-Maii-Adresse) 

GZ. BMVIT -40.005/0005-IV/L 1/2013 DVR:0000175 

Paul Gretch Director, Office of International Aviation 

Office of the Assistant Secretary for 

Aviation and International Affairs 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 7th Strett, S.W. Room 6402 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Gretch, 

Bundesministerium 

fiirVerkehr, 

lnooWJtion und Technologie 

Vienna, 30 July 2013 

With reference to the intentions of Tyrolean Jet Services in continuing non-scheduled (charter) air 

services to/from the United States based on fifth, sixth or seventh freedom traffic rights and 

referring to the designation of the said airline the Austria Civil Aviation Authority and according to 

the provisions of the bilateral air services agreement (Air Services Agreement between the 

Austrian Federal Government and the Government of the United States of America, done at 

Vienna on 16th of March 1989, as amended), the Austria Civil Aviation Authority hereby confirms 

that similar requests submitted by the U.S. carriers will be treated on the basis of reciprocity 

Silvia Gehrer 

Director, Air Transport Affairs 

Federal Ministry of Transport, 

Innovation and Technology 

Civil Aviation Authority
### NUMBER 13 - 11 - 00 358 - CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ ARROYO COLORADO, APPELLANT,

v. THOMAS M. MCMURRAY , APPELLEE.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 1 05 th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Arroyo Colorado , appealed a judgment entered by the 1 05 th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas. On June 13 , 2011 , the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the notice of appeal failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5(e). See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 9.5(e). The Clerk directed appellant to file an amended notice of appeal with the district clerk's office within 30 days from the date of2

that notice. On October 12, 2011 , the Clerk notified appellant that the defect had not been corrected and warned appellant that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect were not cured within ten days. The notice was sent to appellant’s address by certified mail return receipt requested ; however, the certified mail was returned as unclaimed and unable to forward. Subsequently, the Clerk of the Court sent the notice to appellant by regular mail on November 15, 201 1. Appellant has not responded to the notice or corrected the defect

. On October 7, 2011 , the Clerk of this Court notified appellant , in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $175.00 filing fee was paid. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.3(c)

. The notice was sent to appellant’s address by certified mail return receipt requested ; however, the certified mail
was returned as unclaimed and unable to forward. Subsequently, the Clerk of the Court sent the notice to appellant by regular mail on November 15, 2011. Appellant has not responded to the notice or paid the $175.00 filing fee. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 5, 12.1(b). The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant = s failure to respond to this Court’s notices and correct the defect or pay the filing fee , is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. See id. 37 .3, 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed the 29th day of December , 20 11

.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Solo Cup Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the thirteen weeks ended July 2, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric A. Simonsen, as Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                               
|-------------------------------
|/s/ Eric A. Simonsen           
|Eric A. Simonsen               
|Interim Chief Financial Officer
|                               
|October 16, 2006