alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 77

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the efforts of people of

the United States of Korean ancestry to reunite with their family members in North Korea.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 22, 2001

Mr. BECERRA (for himself and Mr. ROYCE) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the efforts

of people of the United States of Korean ancestry to

reunite with their family members in North Korea.

Whereas on June 25, 1950, North Korea invaded South

Korea, thereby initiating the Korean War, leading to the

loss of countless lives, and further polarizing a world engulfed by the Cold War;

Whereas in the aftermath of the Korean War, the division of

the Koreas at the 38th parallel separated millions of Koreans from their families, tearing at the heart of every

mother, father, daughter, and son;

Whereas on June 13 and 14, 2000, in the first summit conference ever held between leaders of North and South
2

•HCON 77 IH

Korea, South Korean President Kim Dae Jung met with

North Korean leader Kim Jong Il in Pyongyang, North

Korea’s capital;

Whereas in a historic joint declaration, South Korean President Kim Dae Jung and North Korean leader Kim Jong

Il made an important promise to promote economic cooperation and hold reunions of South Korean and North

Korean citizens;

Whereas such reunions have been held in North and South

Korea since the signing of the joint declaration, reuniting

family members who had not seen or heard from each

other for more than 50 years;

Whereas 500,000 people of the United States of Korean ancestry bear the pain of being separated from their families in North Korea;

Whereas the United States values peace in the global community and has long recognized the significance of uniting

families torn apart by the tragedy of war; and

Whereas a petition drive is taking place throughout the

United States, urging the United States Government to

assist in the reunification efforts: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) the Congress and the President should sup4 port efforts to reunite people of the United States of

5 Korean ancestry with their families in North Korea;

6 and
3

•HCON 77 IH

1 (2) such efforts should be made in a timely

2 manner, as 50 years have passed since the separa3 tion of these families.

Æ
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT ASOPUR U OKEM GB O, Pla i ntiff-Appe lla

nt, v. W ASHINGTON STATE DEPARTM ENT OF EC OLOGY,

De fe nda nt-Appe l le e . No. 14-35206 D.C . No. 2:12-c v-05119-TOR M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of W a shington Thom a s O. Ric e , C hie f Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Se pte m

be r 13, 2016 * * B e fore : HAW K INS, N.R . SM ITH, a nd HUR W ITZ, C irc uit Judge s. Asopuru Oke m gbo a

ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s sum

m ary judgm e nt in his em

ploy m e nt a c tion a lle g ing TitleVII and First Am e ndm e nt c la im s. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo, 

# FIL ED SEP 19 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Vasque

z v . C o u nty of Los Ange le

s , 349 F.3d 634, 639 (9th C ir. 2003), a n d we a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt on Oke m gbo’ s Title VII disc rim inat ion c la im

be c a use Oke m gbo fa ile d to ra ise a ge nuine disputeof m ate ria l fa c t a s to whe the r de fe nda nt’ s proffe re d le gitim ate , nondisc rim inatory re a s on for te rm inating his e m ploy m e nt wa s pre te xtua l. Se e id. at 640-42 & 640 n.5 (se tting forth the

burde n shifting fra

m e work for TitleVII e m

ploy m e nt disc rim ination c la im s). The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt on Oke m gbo’ s First Am e ndm e nt c la im

be c a use Oke m gbo fa ile d to e sta blish a ge nuine disputeof m ate ria l fa c t a s to whe the r de fe nda nt viola te d his c o nstitutiona

l rights. Se e N

ic hols v . Danc e r , 657 F.3d 929, 932-33 (9th C i r. 2011) (se tting forth te st for e va luating fre e spe e c h c l a im in the public e m ploy m e nt c onte xt); Ve rnon v . C i ty of Los Ange le s , 27 F.3d 1385, 1392-93 (9th C ir. 1994) (se tting forth te st for fre e e xe rc ise c la im in the public e m

ploy m e nt c onte xt). W e do not c onside r m atte rs not spe c ific a lly an d distinc tly

ra i se d a nd a rgue d in the ope ning brie f, or a

rgum e nts a

n d a lle g ations ra ise d for the first tim e on a ppe a l. Se e Padge tt v . W

right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009). AFFIRM E D. 1 4 - 3 5 2 0 6 2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Roebling Finanical Corp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Janice A. Summers, Acting President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securiteis and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.














/s/ Janice A. SummersJanice A. SummersActing President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 9, 2012
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Pyote Well Service, LLC, * From the 142nd District Court

 of Midland County,

 Trial Court No. CV52277.

Vs. No. 11-17-00147-CV * October 11, 2018

Hudson Specialty Insurance Company, * Memorandum Opinion by Simmons, F.J.

 (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.; 

 Simmons, F.J., sitting by assignment;

 and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

 by assignment)

 (Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of 

this appeal are taxed against Pyote Well Service, LLC.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 77 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 77

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the efforts of people of 
   the United States of Korean ancestry to reunite with their family 
                        members in North Korea.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 77

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas on June 25, 1950, North Korea invaded South Korea, thereby initiating 
        the Korean War, leading to the loss of countless lives, and further 
        polarizing a world engulfed by the Cold War;
Whereas in the aftermath of the Korean War, the division of the Koreas at the 
        38th parallel separated millions of Koreans from their families, tearing 
        at the heart of every mother, father, daughter, and son;
Whereas on June 13 and 14, 2000, in the first summit conference ever held 
        between leaders of North and South Korea, South Korean President Kim Dae 
        Jung met with North Korean leader Kim Jong Il in Pyongyang, North 
        Korea's capital;
Whereas in a historic joint declaration, South Korean President Kim Dae Jung and 
        North Korean leader Kim Jong Il made an important promise to promote 
        economic cooperation and hold reunions of South Korean and North Korean 
        citizens;
Whereas such reunions have been held in North and South Korea since the signing 
        of the joint declaration, reuniting family members who had not seen or 
        heard from each other for more than 50 years;
Whereas 500,000 people of the United States of Korean ancestry bear the pain of 
        being separated from their families in North Korea;
Whereas the United States values peace in the global community and has long 
        recognized the significance of uniting families torn apart by the 
        tragedy of war; and
Whereas a petition drive is taking place throughout the United States, urging 
        the United States Government to assist in the reunification efforts: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) the Congress and the President should support efforts 
        to reunite people of the United States of Korean ancestry with 
        their families in North Korea; and
            (2) such efforts should be made in a timely manner, as 50 
        years have passed since the separation of these families.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 28, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or                15 (d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/                Nancy J. McGurk     |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Nancy                J. McGurk         |
|   | Title: | Chief                Financial Officer |
|   | Date:  | November                14, 2005       |

----
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Dale B. Smith, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mueller Group, LLC;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         [Reserved]

(c)          Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(d)         Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 30,2006

|        |   | /s/ DALE B.  SMITH |
|--------|--------|--------------------|
|   |   | Name:              |   | Dale B. Smith |
|   |   | Title:             | * * | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
**Exhibit 31.1**

Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification

I, Rajesh Kalathur, certify that:

​

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of John Deere Owner Trust 2022 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

​

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

​

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing, and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

​

4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

​

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

​

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association (as indenture trustee).

​

​

| 4                      | ​ | ​                                     |
|------------------------|---------|---------------------------------------------|
| Date: January 24, 2025 | By:     | */s/ Rajesh Kalathur*                       |
| ​                | ​ | Rajesh Kalathur                             |
| ​                | ​ | President of John Deere Capital Corporation |
| ​                | ​ | (as Servicer)                               |

​

----
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Rand Logistics,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
W. McHugh, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as
      of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the
      Company for the periods presented.

Dated: August 14, 2006


/s/ Joseph W. McHugh, Jr.
-------------------------
Joseph W. McHugh, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Allen SOBOTT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 80SA118.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

July 13, 1981.

J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Hennessey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Mary J. Mullarkey, Sol. Gen., Susan P. Mele-Serno-vitz, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

J. Gregory Walta, Colorado State Public Defender, Shelley Gilman, Deputy State Public Defender, Denver, for defendant-appellant.

*1070HODGES, Chief Justice.

Defendant Sobott appeals the sentence he received for robbery. We affirm.

Defendant was charged with two counts of aggravated robbery in connection with the armed robberies of a Mr. Donut shop and a Mr. Taco restaurant. Initially, he entered pleas of not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity to the charges. Thereafter, in connection with a plea agreement, defendant entered a plea of guilty to one count of simple robbery and the other charges were dismissed. Defendant was sentenced to a term of eight to ten years imprisonment, to be served concurrently with a ten to fifteen year sentence previously imposed in connection with a separate conviction for aggravated robbery.

I.

The defendant argues that the sentence imposed is excessive in light of the nature of the offense and the defendant’s character.

The record indicates that during each of these robberies defendant was armed with a sawed-off shotgun. At the time of sentencing, he was twenty-five years of age and had a prior criminal record which included three felony convictions. One of the prior convictions was for aggravated robbery.

Defendant admits that he has a drug use problem and claimed that he was under the influence of a drug and alcohol at the time of these robberies. Consequently, defendant asserts a shorter sentence combined with a drug and alcohol abuse treatment program would better serve the important social goal of rehabilitation. Our review of the record indicates that defendant has been aware of his drug and alcohol dependence for a number of years and has never made any effort to benefit from any rehabilitation program.

Robbery is a class 4 felony, and at the time of this defendant’s sentencing was punishable by a term of one to ten years imprisonment. The imposition of an eight to ten year sentence in this case was not an abuse of discretion requiring modification by this court on appeal. *See People v. McKenna,*Colo., 611 P.2d 574 (1980); *Triggs v. People,*197 Colo. 229, 591 P.2d 1024 (1979); *People v. Bruebaker,*189 Colo. 219, 539 P.2d 1277 (1975); *People v. Duran,*188 Colo. 207, 533 P.2d 1116 (1975).

II.

Defendant also maintains that section 25 of House Bill 1589, as amended in March 1979, Colo.Sess.Laws 1979, ch. 157, Sec. 25 at 672, unconstitutionally infringes upon this court’s rule-making authority, and argues that he is entitled to be resentenced under the presumptive sentencing provisions of the 1977 version of House Bill 1589, Colo.Sess.Laws 1977, ch. 216, 18-1-105 at 867. These arguments are without merit. *People v. McKenna, supra; see People v. Francis,*Colo., 630 P.2d 82, n. 1 (1981).

Judgment affirmed.

LEE, J., does not participate.
REVISION HISTORY for PDP 1993 Public-Domain Database

5/26/2015 Revision: Revised the 1992-2013 data ZIP files to add tolerance tables for the 1992-2013 surveys to each 

downloadable ZIP file on the PDP Website. Populated a new ToleranceRef table in each PDPyyyy.mdb database file. 

Added Excel worksheets for the 1992-2013 tolerance tables into the Ref Tables Excel files included in the ZIP file. The 

new reference/look-up table holds established EPA Tolerance values for each reported pesticide/commodity pair. 

12/10/2008 Revision: Revised the 1992-2006 public-domain databases and data ZIP files to incorporate a primary 

key value (SAMPLE_PK column) to link the Sample & Results data tables, designed to provide quicker searches 

and smaller databases. Published the ZIP files that contain the revised 1992-2006 databases along with 

supporting documentation (instructions, data dictionary, and reference table lists) to the PDP Website.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 14, 2017

Order 

Clerk

July 14, 2017

154358(62)

STEVEN ILIADES and JANE ILIADES,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

SC: 154358

v COA: 324726 

Oakland CC: 12-129407-NP

DIEFFENBACHER NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan Manufacturers 

Association to file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on 

July 11, 2017, is accepted for filing.