alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Terrance J. Bieker, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PRA International;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report is being prepared;     (b) Designed such internal control over financialreporting, or caused such internal control over financial reportingto be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles;     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report; and     (d) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.      Signature:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 72 (Friday, April 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 22298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8906]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Intent To Grant an Exclusive Patent License

    Summary: Pursuant to the provisions of Part 404 of Title 37, Code 
of Federal Regulations, which implements Public Law 96-517, as amended; 
the Department of the Air Force announces its intention to grant PS 
Engineering, Inc., a corporation of the State of Tennessee, having a 
place of business at 9800 Martel Road Lenoir City, Tennessee, an 
exclusive license limited to the field of aviation in any right, title 
and interest the Air Force has in:

U.S. Patent No. 7,391,877, issued 24 June 2008, entitled ``Spatial 
Processor for Enhanced Performance in Multi-Talker Speech Displays,'' 
by Douglas S. Brungart.

The Air Force intends to grant a license for the patent unless a 
written objection is received within fifteen (15) days from the date of 
publication of this Notice. Written objection should be sent to: Air 
Force Materiel Command Law Office, AFMCLO/JAZ, 2240 B Street Rm D-14, 
Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433-7109; Facsimile: (937) 255-3733.

Bao-Anh Trinh,
DAF, Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-8906 Filed 4-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-P
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-3091

___________________________

Andrew Erik Heiderscheid

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Dakota County Sheriff's Office; Deputy Winfrey; Deputy Arturo Herrera; Deputy

Smith; Deputy Kent Themmes; Deputy John Doe; Deputy Jane Doe, Names of all

the people the suit is against, Individually and in their official capacities; Jacob

Schak; Tina Tyler; Ryan Fitzhenry; Julienne Oppong

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota

 ____________

 Submitted: May 21, 2021

Filed: May 26, 2021 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and ERICKSON Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Andrew Heiderscheid appeals the district

court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment. After careful review of the record and

the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Whitson v. Stone

Cnty. Jail, 602 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review). Accordingly, we

affirm.2

 See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Leo I.

Brisbois, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

2Heiderscheid’s opening brief includes a motion “ask[ing] the Court to grant

him leave from adding supplemental briefing.” That motion is denied as moot.

-2-
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 1, 2016

s0525 

# Order

Clerk June 1, 2016

151947 & (12)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151947

COA: 326885

Antrim CC: 14

- 004665

- FH

MATTHEW JAMES TROJANEK,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 27, 2015 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for

consideration, as on leave granted, of the issues not addressed by that court during its

initial review of this case. With regard to the defendant’s challenge to costs, leave to

appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be

reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of

Appeals. The motion to amend the application for leave to appeal is DENIED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 28, 2011 

h1025 

Order 

 

October 28, 2011 

143881 & (29)(30) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143881 

 COA: 305481 

DAVONTAE SANFORD, Wayne CC: 07-015018-FC 

Defendant-Appellant. 

____________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the October 7, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to stay is DENIED.
CCC COMMODITY INVENTORY

As of September 30, 2019

(Million Units Except as Noted) OUTSTANDING UNDER LOAN CCC-OWNED

CY 2018 CY 2019 INVENTORY 2/

(Actual Units)

BUTTER (LB) - - 0.0

CHEESE (LB) - - 0.0

NONFAT DRY MILK (LB) - - 0.0

BARLEY (BU) 0.1 2.0 0.0

CORN (BU) 53.5 66.6 0.0

OATS (BU) 0.0 0.4 0.0

SORGHUM (BU) 0.4 0.0 0.0

SOYBEANS (BU) 16.5 0.1 0.0

WHEAT (BU) 6.6 28.7 0.0

RICE (CWT) 1.7 0.7 0.0

REFINED SUGAR (Mil. Lbs.) 0.0 0.0 0.0

 IN-PROCESS BEET 0.0 0.0 0.0

RAW CANE SUGAR (Mil. Lbs.) 0.0 0.0 0.0

 IN-PROCESS CANE 0.0 0.0 0.0

HONEY (Mil. Lbs.) 0.1 4.4 0.0

PEANUTS (tons) 161,950.0 75,000.0 13,072.90

CANOLA SEED (CWT) 1/ 124.0 83.0 0.0

CRAMBE (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0

FLAXSEED (CWT) 1/ 1.0 0.0 0.0

MUSTARD SEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0

RAPESEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0

SAFFLOWER SEED (CWT) 1/ 4.0 0.0 0.0

SESAME SEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0

SUNFLOWER SEED (OIL) (CWT) 1/ 37.0 0.0 0.0

SUNFLOWER SEED (Other) (CWT) 1/ 1.0 0.0 0.0

DRY PEAS (CWT) 1/ 149.0 430.0 0.0

LENTILS (CWT) 1/ 360.0 103.0 0.0

CHICKPEAS (CWT) 1/ 692.0 54.0 0.0

UPLAND COTTON (BALE) 174,900 188,300 7,299

ELS COTTON (BALE) 28,800 0 0

1/ Minor Oilseeds & Pulses are in thousand units.

2/ CCC acquired 2018 Crop Year upland cotton as follows: 

15 bales from May 2019, 81 bales from June 2019, 2,996 bales from July 2019, and 12,458 

bales from August maturing loans. In total, there were 15,550 bales of upland cotton in 

inventory. Following multiple Invitations for sale in September, a total of 8,251 bales of 

cotton were sold. This brought the total CCC cotton inventory to 7,299 bales as of 

September 30, 2019. CCC also acquired 4,559.12 tons of 2018 Crop Year peanuts following 

their July 2019 maturity date, and 37,417.73 tons of 2018 Crop year peanuts following their 

August 2019 maturity date. Total CCC peanut inventory was 41,976.85 tons. CCC sold 

340.51 tons from Invitation No. 8 and 28,563.44 tons from Invitation No. 9. This brought 

the total CCC peanut inventory to 13,072.90 tons as of September 30, 2019. 

Report Completed: October 24, 2019
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, CoreyHenry, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2022-2(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement inall material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included inthis report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank,N.A. 

 
By: /s/ Corey HenryName: Corey HenryTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date: March 31, 2023**
Abatement Order filed June 30, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00380-CR

____________

GUSTAVO ANDRES VASQUEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1412198

ABATEMENT ORDER

The trial court failed to submit findings of fact and conclusions of law on the 

voluntariness of appellant’s statement. Article 38.22, section 6 of the Texas Code 

of Criminal Procedure requires the trial court to make written fact findings and 

conclusions of law as to whether a challenged statement was made voluntarily, 

even if appellant did not request them or object to their absence. Tex. Code Crim. 

Proc. art. 38.22 ' 6; Urias v. State, 155 S.W.3d 141, 142 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). 
The statute is mandatory and the proper procedure to correct the error is to abate 

the appeal and direct the trial court to make the required findings and conclusions. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4; Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1987). 

Accordingly, the trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of 

fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s statement and have 

a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings filed with the clerk of this 

Court on or before July 30, 2015.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will 

also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party. 

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway, J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 29, 2010

jam 

# Order

April 29, 2010

140997 (22)

PAULA ANN NICE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140997
COA: 295543 MICHAEL KENNETH FRY,

Defendant-Appellant.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion to waive f ees is considered and it
is DENIED because MCL 600.2 963 requires that a prisone r pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Within 21 days of the certification of this order, defendant shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $4.00, shall submit a copy of this order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned
with this order. Failure to comply with this orde r shall result in the appeal not being
filed in this Court. If defendant timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to defendant’s account un til the payments equal the balance due of $371.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) defenda nt shall not file further appeals in this Court until the entry fee in th is case is paid in full.
The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to defendant and return defendant’s pl eadings with this order.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Papaya Growth Opportunity Corp. I (the "Company") for the year ended
December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Clay
Whitehead, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                                                                                       
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in
    the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
    period covered by the Report.



|Date: March 31, 2022 | By: | /s/ Clay Whitehead           
|-------------------- | --- | -----------------------------
|                     |     | Clay Whitehead               
|                     |     | Chief Executive Officer      
|                     |     | (Principal Executive Officer)
MP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0606

IN THE MATTER OF Z.L.,

A Youth.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellees’ motion for a 60-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including September 25, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 18 2020

07/20/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0606
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 72 (Friday, April 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 22298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8889]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Intent To Grant an Exclusive Patent License

    Summary: Pursuant to the provisions of Part 404 of Title 37, Code 
of Federal Regulations, which implements Public Law 96-517, as amended; 
the Department of the Air Force announces its intention to grant PS 
Engineering, Inc., a corporation of the State of Tennessee, having a 
place of business at 9800 Martel Road, Lenoir City, Tennessee, an 
exclusive license limited to the field of aviation in any right, title 
and interest the Air Force has in:

U.S. Patent No. 7,391,877, issued 24 June 2008, entitled ``Spatial 
Processor for Enhanced Performance in Multi-Talker Speech Displays,'' 
by Douglas S. Brungart.

The Air Force intends to grant a license for the patent unless a 
written objection is received within fifteen (15) days from the date of 
publication of this Notice. Written objection should be sent to: Air 
Force Materiel Command Law Office, AFMCLO/JAZ, 2240 B Street, Rm D-14, 
Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433-7109; Facsimile: (937) 255-3733.

Henry Williams, Jr.,
DAF, Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-8889 Filed 4-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-P
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-1354

_____________________________

CITY OF HIALEAH/SEDGWICK 

CMS,

Appellant,

v.

TONY BONO,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.

Gerardo Castiello, Judge.

Date of Accident: December 2, 2013

February 5, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, RAY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 
2

9.331.

_____________________________

David Goehl of Martinez Roman Goehl, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

Kimberly A. Hill of Kimberly A. Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, for 

Appellee.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16D0334. ELIZABETH L. CUNNINGHAM v. J. ALAN KOHR.

Elizabeth Cunningham, the former guardian of David Napier Cunningham,

challenges the trial court’s order directing her to pay attorney fees and expenses

incurred by Alan Kohr, the current guardian of David Cunningham, in discharging

a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Elizabeth Cunningham. In its order, the

court cites both OCGA § 9-15-14 and the habeas corpus statute, OCGA § 9-14-21,

as bases for its award. Elizabeth Cunningham argues that attorney fees and expenses

are not permitted under the habeas corpus statute.

The Georgia Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction over all casesinvolving

habeas corpus. See Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (4). Under the

circumstances presented in this application, it appears jurisdiction may lie in the

Supreme Court. It is well-settled that the ultimate responsibility for determining

appellate jurisdiction is vested in the Supreme Court of Georgia. See Saxton v.

Coastal Dialysis &c., 267 Ga. 177, 178 (476 SE2d 587) (1996). Accordingly, this

application is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.

May 03, 2016
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

05/03/2016
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, CoreyHenry, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and allreports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust2021-3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2.    Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of thedistribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of RegulationAB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included inthis report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: WilmingtonTrust, National Association. 

 
By: 
/s/ Corey Henry
Name: Corey HenryTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer**