alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Rev 0 (9/08)

Comments in Response to 

“Final rule; request for comments”

Docket: FAA-2013-0863- Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-178-AD

Comments have been received in response to: “Final rule; request for comments,”

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above. 

(Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted.

Once you have made your determination, please fill in the commenter(s) name(s) and check the 

appropriate response below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, 

if necessary. Then include your name and the date in the spaces provided, and return it to the 

AD directorate focal.

The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we received from: The 

Boeing Company, reference B-H210-13-00862.

(Please check one)

 These comments have not been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration 

or change of this AD.

 These comments have been found to contain information that warrants consideration of 

additional regulatory action. (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual 

FAA-IR-M-8040.1 FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.)

______Narinder Luthra_____ Dec 12, 2013__

Name: Date:

(This form is part of the official docket file for this AD action.)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40571

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALFONSO MONDRAGON-JIMENEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CR-46-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alfonso

Mondragon-Jimenez concedes that the arguments raised are

foreclosed by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for

further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance

in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED,

and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### Stanley Wayne KAMP, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. J-80-822.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Sept. 8, 1981.

ORDER DECLINING TO ASSUME JURISDICTION AND DISMISSING APPEAL

The appellant was charged as an adult pursuant to 10 O.S.1980 Supp., § 1104.2, in the District Court of Pontotoc County, Case No. CRF-80-117, with Rape in the Second Degree and Robbery with Firearm. A motion was filed by the appellant to be certified as a juvenile and to remand the charges to the juvenile division of the district court. This appeal is made from the order of November 14, 1980, which denied the application of the appellant to be certified as a juvenile and ordered him held for trial on the felony information filed against him.

The State of Oklahoma, through William N. Peterson, District Attorney for District 22, filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for the reason that the statutes do not provide for an appeal from an order denying reverse certification.

This Court finds that no provision has been made by the Legislature for appealing a denial by the trial court of reverse certification at the conclusion of the hearing on the motion to certify to the juvenile division of the court. Title 10 O.S.1980 Supp., § 1104.2, which provides for certification as a child, does not provide for an appeal from denial of such. Furthermore, a careful reading of 10 O.S.1980 Supp., § 1112(e), reveals that it likewise does not provide for an appeal, contrary to the contention of the appellant. See also Rule 7.2B of the Rules of this Court, 52 O.B.J. 1318 (June 6, 1981). As this Court stated in *Harris*v. *State,*625 P.2d 1269 (Okl.Cr.1981), it is left to the discretion of the magistrate whether or not there is sufficient proof provided by the party to establish his eligibility to be considered as a juvenile. Since *761the magistrate denied the motion, the defendant remains in the status of an adult, and in the event he is bound over to stand trial, the trial should proceed.

We therefore decline to assume jurisdiction herein and it is the order of this Court that the attempted appeal be dismissed.

WITNESS OUR HANDS AND THE SEAL OF THIS COURT this 8th day of September, 1981.

TOM BRETT, P. J.

HEZ J. BUSSEY, J.

TOM R. CORNISH, J.
SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT OF


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION





I, Scott Cooke, certify that:





(a)  A review of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s activities and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2021 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as
        seller, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”) and sponsor, and Toyota Auto Receivables 2021-C Owner Trust, as issuer, during the period from September 27, 2021 to December 31, 2021 has been made under my
        supervision.










March 28, 2022





By:  /s/ Scott Cooke


Scott Cooke


Senior Vice President


Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as Servicer of


Toyota Auto Receivables 2021-C Owner Trust
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. 24 - 0012 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICHAEL ROSS TROMBLEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 10 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 1 2024

05/01/2024
Case Number: DA 24-0012
#### SUCCESSION OF Lee A. MALONE.

No. 87-C-1439.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1987.

In re Malone, Lee A., Succ. of; Malone, Donna Marie — Other; Malone, Margie Marie — Other; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA86-0518; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 22694.

Prior report: La.App., 509 So.2d 659.

Not considered. The judgment is definitive. La.C.C.Pr. art. 2166.
EXHIBIT 32


SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John C. Roman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Lee R. Schlesinger, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of the date and for the period covered by the Report.








/s/ John C. Roman


John C. Roman


President and Chief Executive Officer


(principal executive officer)





/s/ Lee R. Schlesinger


Lee R. Schlesinger


Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


(principal financial officer)








Date: November 15, 2010
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2994
In Re: TONEY TUCKER ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, t/a Lexington Park Chrysler Plymouth Jeep Eagle, Debtor.

_________________________ MELDON S. HOLLIS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, and TONEY TUCKER, Plaintiff, versus CHRYSLER CREDIT CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 95-3022
In Re: TONEY TUCKER ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, t/a Lexington Park Chrysler Plymouth Jeep Eagle, Debtor.

_________________________2 TONEY TUCKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, and MELDON S. HOLLIS, JR., Plaintiff, versus CHRYSLER CREDIT CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA95-2442-DKC, BK-94-1-6858-DK) Submitted: October 22, 1996 Decided: November 15, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Meldon S. Hollis, Jr., HOLLIS & ASSOCIATES, P.A., Randallstown, Maryland; Elmer Douglass Ellis, Washington, D.C., for Appellants. John Francis Carlton, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: The Appellants appeal from the district court's order finding them in civil contempt after violating a bankruptcy court order. Our review of the record discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hollis v. Chrysler Credit Corp. , Nos. CA-95-2442-DKC; BK-94- 1-6858-DK (D. Md. Oct. 10 & 25, 1995); Tucker v. Chrysler Credit Corp. , Nos. CA-95-2442-DKC; BK-94-1-6858-DK (D. Md. Oct. 10 & 19,1995). Appellee's motion to dismiss both appeals is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
J. Parker Erkmann

T: +1 202 776 2036

perkmann@cooley.com

VIA REGULATIONS.GOV AND EMAIL

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM

February 6, 2015

Mr. Paul Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

Room W86-316

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Polling Results for Application of JetBlue Airways Corporation for Exemption 

Authority (US-Grenada), DOT-OST-2015-0019-0001

Dear Mr. Gretch:

We have polled and received non-objections from each of the carriers on the 

attached service list for the above-referenced application of JetBlue Airways Corporation 

(“JetBlue”). Prompt approval is requested so that JetBlue can secure foreign authority, 

make final operating plans and begin the marketing of the flights between New York (JFK) 

and Grenada well in advance of operations, which JetBlue plans to commence on or about 

June 11, 2015, provided all necessary approvals have been secured.

Sincerely,

J. Parker Erkmann

Counsel for JetBlue Airways Corporation

JPE:ec
Mr. Paul Gretch

February 6, 2015

Page Two

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM

Service List

howard.kass@aa.com

robert.wirick@aa.com

American 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

chris.walker@delta.com

Delta 

cristinasa@state.gov 

john.s.duncan@faa.gov

robert.finamore@dot.gov

brett.kruger@dot.gov

brian.hedberg@dot.gov

Darren.jaffe@dot.gov

reese.davidson@dot.gov

Paul.Gretch@dot.gov

brubinst@panynj.gov JFK

113838128 v1
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 449 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 449

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That: (a) The Speaker of the House of Representatives (in consultation 
with the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives), with respect 
to the House of Representatives, and the President pro tempore of the 
Senate (in consultation with the Majority Leader and the Minority 
Leader of the Senate), with respect to the Senate, may send such 
Representatives, Senators and other appropriate persons, to a special 
meeting of Congress and related events to be held on Friday, September 
6, 2002 in New York, New York, in remembrance of the terrorist attacks 
of September 11, 2001, and in recognition of the City of New York for 
the harm it sustained and its recovery.
    (b) Attendees under subsection (a) shall be led by the Speaker and 
the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, and by the 
President pro tempore (or his designee), Majority Leader, and the 
Minority Leader of the Senate.
    Sec. 2. The Congress may accept the offer of the City of New York 
and entities controlled by the City of New York to host and pay the 
expenses of the Congress to prepare, attend, and participate in the 
special meeting of September 6, 2002, and related events of that day, 
referred to in section 1.
    Sec. 3. On behalf of the Congress, the officers of the House of 
Representatives and the officers of the Senate may make arrangements 
with the City of New York and other required entities and agencies for 
participation by the Congress for the purposes designated under this 
resolution.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 449

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Providing for representation by Congress at a special meeting in New 
             York, New York, on Friday, September 6, 2002.
```
CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
      CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350






In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Orgral
      Technologies Corp. for the quarter ending February 28, 2007, I, Helen Heit,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Orgral Technologies
      Corp.
      hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
      and
      belief, that:







1.
            
            Such
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending February 28,
                2007,
                fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
            
            The
                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
                the
                quarter ending February 28, 2007, fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Orgral
                Technologies Corp.






Dated:
      April 16, 2007






Orgral
      Technologies Corp.





By:
      /s/ Helen Heit


Chief
      Executive Officer and


Chief
      Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-20693

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

IVAN RANGEL HERNANDEZ, also known as Ivan Hernandez, also known as 

Ivan Rangel-Hernandez, also known as Ivan N. Hernandez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:16-CR-174-1

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ivan Rangel 

Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez has filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 5, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-20693 Document: 00513981381 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/05/2017
No. 16-20693

2

as Hernandez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-20693 Document: 00513981381 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/05/2017
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

 OF FLORIDA 

 SECOND DISTRICT 

TROYTS AUTO SERVICE and TROYTS ) 

BOGAR VALERO, ) 

 ) 

 Appellants, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D14-2201 

 ) 

GENNARE VITELLI, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

 ) 

Opinion filed September 11, 2015. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; William P. Levens, 

Judge. 

Roland A. Hermida, Tampa, for Appellants. 

No appearance for Appellee. 

BLACK, Judge. 

Troyts Auto Service and Troyts Bogar Valero challenge the final judgment 

of the trial court ordering them to pay conversion damages to Gennare Vitelli. The 

appellants argue that the trial court erred in finding liability for conversion because the 

matter was not pleaded or tried by consent. We agree and reverse. 

In the complaint, Mr. Vitelli alleged one count of civil theft and two counts 
- 2 - 

of fraudulent misrepresentation in the inducement.1 Following a nonjury trial, the trial 

court entered a final judgment finding that Mr. Vitelli failed to establish that the 

appellants committed civil theft or fraudulently induced Mr. Vitelli.2 However, the trial 

court did find the appellants liable for conversion. This was error. "A trial court may not 

decree relief that has been neither pleaded nor tried by consent." Lodge Constr., Inc. v. 

Far E. GC Exponent, Inc., 800 So. 2d 325, 325 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (citing Conidaris v. 

Cresswood Servs., Inc., 779 So. 2d 518, 519 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)). The complaint does 

not include a claim for conversion, it was not amended nor was a request to amend 

filed, and the record does not demonstrate that the issue was tried by the consent of the 

parties.3 

Accordingly, we reverse the portion of the final judgment finding the 

appellants liable for conversion as well as the damages awarded pursuant thereto and 

remand for entry of an amended final judgment. 

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded. 

NORTHCUTT and SALARIO, JJ., Concur. 

 1Mr. Vitelli did not participate in this appeal. 

2Though the complaint contained two claims for fraud, the trial court's 

order did not address the latter claim. 

3In the initial brief the appellants explained that Mr. Vitelli concluded his 

written closing argument by requesting that the court consider finding the appellants 

liable for conversion should the court determine that he failed to establish the requisite 

intent for civil theft.
# Fruits, Vegetables, Nuts

# Meat, Poultry, Eggs, Aquatics
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Artcraft III Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending August 31, 2005, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, John Lopes, Chief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 
|   | (1) | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending August 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | (2) | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending August 31, 2005, fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Artcraft III Inc. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

*/s/ John Lopes*

John Lopes

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer

 

October 24, 2005
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    Home





    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos

    Coronavirus Disease 2019

    Air Force Art Collection





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    CSAF Leadership Library    
        CSAF Leadership Library 2021

    2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    2015 CSAF Reading List

    2014 CSAF Reading List

    2013 CSAF Reading List

    2012 CSAF Reading List

    2011 CSAF Reading List

    2010 CSAF Reading List

    2009 CSAF Reading List

    2008 CSAF Reading List

    2007 CSAF Reading List

    2006 CSAF Reading List

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2021

    Focus on Priorities

    Empowered Airmen





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers





    Contact Us  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (3.9 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR ActOSI Tip Line
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit