Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2012 / Notices 21733 

Manufacturer/exporter Percent 

margin 

Sucocitrico Cutrale, S.A. ................ 2.81 

Fischer S.A. Comercio, Industria, 

and Agricultura ............................ 8.73 

Louis Dreyfus Commodities 

Agroindustrial S.A. ...................... 22.03 

Montecitrus Trading S.A. ................ (*) 

* No shipments or sales subject to this 

review. 

Disclosure and Public Hearing 

The Department will disclose to 

parties the calculations performed in 

connection with these preliminary 

results within five days of the date of 

publication of this notice. See 19 CFR 

351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309, 

interested parties may submit cases 

briefs not later than 30 days after the 

date of publication of this notice. 

Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised 

in the case briefs, may be filed not later 

than five days after the time limit for 

filing the case briefs. Parties who submit 

case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are requested to submit with 

each argument: (1) A statement of the 

issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of authorities. 

See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2). 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing, or to participate if one is 

requested, must submit a written 

request to the Assistant Secretary for 

Import Administration, filed 

electronically using Import 

Administration’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). 

An electronically filed document must 

be received successfully in its entirety 

by the Department’s electronic records 

system, IA ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern 

Standard Time within 30 days after the 

date of publication of this notice. 

Requests should contain: (1) The party’s 

name, address and telephone number; 

(2) the number of participants; and (3) 

a list of issues to be discussed. Issues 

raised in the hearing will be limited to 

those raised in the respective case briefs 

and rebuttal briefs. The Department will 

issue the final results of this 

administrative review, including the 

results of its analysis of the issues raised 

in the case briefs and rebuttals, not later 

than 120 days after the date of 

publication of this notice, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of the 

administrative review, the Department 

shall determine, and CBP shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212. The Department will issue 

appropriate appraisement instructions 

for the companies subject to this review 

directly to CBP 15 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review. 

We will calculate importer-specific ad 

valorem duty assessment rates based on 

the ratio of the total amount of 

antidumping duties calculated for the 

examined sales to the total entered 

value of the sales. We will instruct CBP 

to assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review if any importer-specific 

assessment rate calculated in the final 

results of this review is above de 

minimis. Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate without regard to antidumping 

duties any entries for which the 

assessment rate is de minimis. See 19 

CFR 351.106(c)(1). The final results of 

this review shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise covered by the 

final results of this review and for future 

deposits of estimated duties, where 

applicable. 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003. See Assessment Policy 

Notice. This clarification will apply to 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR produced by companies 

included in these final results of review 

for which the reviewed companies did 

not know that the merchandise they 

sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller, 

trading company, or exporter) was 

destined for the United States. In such 

instances, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediary involved in the 

transaction. See Assessment Policy 

Notice for a full discussion of this 

clarification. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for each specific 

company listed above will be that 

established in the final results of this 

review, except if the rate is less than 

0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis 

within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash 

deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

previously reviewed or investigated 

companies not participating in this 

review, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

if the exporter is not a firm covered in 

this review, or the original less than fair 

value (LTFV) investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recent period for the manufacturer of 

the merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other manufacturers 

or exporters of NFC, and for FCOJM 

produced and/or exported by Cargill 

Citrus Limitada will continue to be 

16.51 percent, the all-others rate made 

effective by the LTFV investigation. See 

OJ Order, 71 FR at 12184. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 

the reimbursement of antidumping 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

This administrative review and notice 

are published in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.221. 

Dated: March 30, 2012. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2012–8381 Filed 4–10–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–833] 

Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From 

Taiwan: Extension of Time Limit for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 11, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael A. Romani, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 1, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0198. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
21734 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2012 / Notices 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Requests for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 37781 (June 

28, 2011). 

2Additionally, the petitioners requested a 35 day 

extension in order to review the voluminous 

response data provided by Far Eastern New Century 

Corporation in this administrative review. See the 

petitioners’ March 23, 2012, letter at 2. 

1See Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving and 

Racks From the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of the First Administrative 

Review, Preliminary Rescission, in Part, and 

Extension of Time Limits for the Final Results, 76 

FR 62765 (October 11, 2011) (‘‘Preliminary 

Results’’). 

2As explained in the Preliminary Results, the 

abbreviated POR for oven racks, a subset of subject 

merchandise, is September 9, 2009, through August 

31, 2010. See Preliminary Results, 76 FR at 62766. 

Background 

At the request of interested parties, 

the Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on certain polyester staple fiber from 

Taiwan for the period May 1, 2010, 

through April 30, 2011.1 In Certain 

Polyester Staple Fiber From Taiwan: 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 77 FR 4543 

(January 30, 2012) we extended the 

period of time for issuing the 

preliminary results by 85 days to April 

25, 2012. 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

the Department to make a preliminary 

determination within 245 days after the 

last day of the anniversary month of an 

order for which a review is requested 

and a final determination within 120 

days after the date on which the 

preliminary determination is published 

in the Federal Register. If it is not 

practicable to complete the review 

within these time periods, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend the time limit for 

the preliminary determination to a 

maximum of 365 days after the last day 

of the anniversary month. 

We determine that it is not practicable 

to complete the preliminary results of 

this review by the current deadline of 

April 25, 2012, because we require 

additional time to analyze responses 

with respect to the respondent’s 

reported quarterly cost of production.2

Therefore, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(2), we are further extending 

the time period for issuing the 

preliminary results of this review by an 

additional 35 days to May 30, 2012. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: April 3, 2012. 

Gary Taverman, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–8482 Filed 4–10–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–485–805] 

Certain Small Diameter Carbon and 

Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and 

Pressure Pipe From Romania: 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 11, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Thomas Schauer, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 1, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–0410. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

At the request of ArcelorMittal 

Tubular Products Roman S.A. (AMTP), 

Romanian producer and exporter of the 

subject merchandise, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) initiated an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

small diameter carbon and alloy 

seamless standard, line and pressure 

pipe from Romania for the period 

August 1, 2010, through July 31, 2011. 

See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Requests for Revocation in 

Part, 76 FR 61076 (October 3, 2011). The 

preliminary results of this review are 

currently due no later than May 2, 2012. 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

the Department to complete the 

preliminary results within 245 days 

after the last day of the anniversary 

month of an order for which a review 

is requested. If it is not practicable to 

complete the review within this time 

period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 

allows the Department to extend the 

time limit for the preliminary results to 

a maximum of 365 days after the last 

day of the anniversary month. 

We determine that it is not practicable 

to complete the preliminary results of 

this review within the original time 

limit because we have, subsequent to 

receipt of AMTP’s questionnaire 

responses, initiated a sales-below-cost 

investigation based upon the allegation 

of the petitioner, U.S. Steel. See the 

memorandum to Susan Kuhbach dated 

February 24, 2012. We are still in the 

process of analyzing AMTP’s response 

to section D of our questionnaire and it 

is not practicable to do this, issue a 

supplemental questionnaire, and 

analyze the supplemental response (and 

issue any further supplemental 

questionnaires, as necessary) before the 

current deadline. Therefore, we are 

extending the time period for issuing 

the preliminary results of this review by 

105 days until August 15, 2012. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2). 

Dated: April 5, 2012. 

Edward C. Yang, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–8747 Filed 4–10–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–941] 

Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving 

and Racks From the People’s Republic 

of China: Final Results and Partial 

Rescission of First Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On October 11, 2011, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published in the 

Federal Register the preliminary results 

of the first administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

kitchen appliance shelving and racks 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’).1 We gave interested parties an 

opportunity to comment on the 

Preliminary Results. Based upon our 

analysis of the comments and 

information received, we have made 

changes to the margin calculations for 

the final results. We continue to find 

that certain exporters have sold subject 

merchandise at less than normal value 

during the period of review (‘‘POR’’) 

March 5, 2009, through August 31, 

2010.2


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES