alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration  under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the Small business Investment Company License No. 02/72-0623 issued to Red Rock Ventures II, L.P., and said license is hereby declared null and void.

United States Small Business Administration.

Dated: October 27, 2011.

Sean J. Greene,

Associate Administrator for Investment.

[FR Doc. 2012-889 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
391 A.2d 684

#### Commonwealth v. Hooker, Appellant.

Submitted March 13,1978.

John D. Flinchbaugh, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Sheryl Ann Dorney and Michael K. Worrall, Assistant District Attorneys, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

HOFFMAN and SPAETH, JJ., dissented and would remand for resentencing. *Commonwealth v. Riggins,*474 Pa. 115, 377 A.2d 140 (1977).
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20940 Conference Calendar

JOE GAMBOA RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DESSIE CHERRY et al., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CV-3831

- - - - - - - - - - April 16, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Joe Gamboa Rodriguez, #648878, moves this court for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal from the dismissal of his civil rights complaint. On January 9, 1997, Chief Judge Politz ordered Rodriguez to file an affidavit for leave to proceed IFP on appeal pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA). The order held Rodriguez’s appeal in abeyance for 30 days pending payment of the $105 filing fee or submittal of theNo. 96-20940 - 2 - required documents pursuant to the PLRA. Rodriguez timely responded; however, the financial documentation submitted by Rodriguez does not comply with the requirements imposed by the PLRA because he did not submit a signed affidavit attesting to his assets owned, nor did Rodriguez submit information regarding his prison trust account for the period required. See § 1915(a). Accordingly, Rodriguez’s motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED, and his appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Fifth Circuit Rule 42.3. Should Rodriguez wish to reinstate his appeal, he is instructed to pay the $105 filing fee to the clerk of the district court within 30 days from the date of this order.
MOTION DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.
CCC COMMODITY INVENTORY

As of April 30, 2021

(Million Units Except as Noted) OUTSTANDING UNDER LOAN CCC-OWNED

CY 2019 CY 2020 INVENTORY 2/

(Actual Units)

BUTTER (LB) - - 0.0

CHEESE (LB) - - 0.0

NONFAT DRY MILK (LB) - - 0.0

BARLEY (BU) 0.0 3.0 0.0

CORN (BU) 5.2 304.5 0.0

OATS (BU) 0.0 0.6 0.0

SORGHUM (BU) 0.0 0.2 0.0

SOYBEANS (BU) 0.7 34.2 0.0

WHEAT (BU) 0.0 16.5 0.0

RICE (CWT) 0.0 22.3 0.0

REFINED SUGAR (Mil. Lbs.) 20.0 953.0 0.0

 IN-PROCESS BEET 0.0 1,099.0 0.0

RAW CANE SUGAR (Mil. Lbs.) 0.0 1,355.5 0.0

 IN-PROCESS CANE 0.0 0.0 0.0

HONEY (Mil. Lbs.) 0.0 5.5 0.0

PEANUTS (tons) 0.0 1,147,100.0 0.00

CANOLA SEED (CWT) 1/ 14.0 138.0 0.0

CRAMBE (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0

FLAXSEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 7.0 0.0

MUSTARD SEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 3.0 0.0

RAPESEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0

SAFFLOWER SEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0

SESAME SEED (CWT) 1/ 0.0 0.0 0.0

SUNFLOWER SEED (OIL) (CWT) 1/ 0.0 391.0 0.0

SUNFLOWER SEED (Other) (CWT) 1/ 0.0 30.0 0.0

DRY PEAS (CWT) 1/ 0.0 399.0 0.0

LENTILS (CWT) 1/ 0.0 131.0 0.0

CHICKPEAS (CWT) 1/ 28.0 85.0 0.0

UPLAND COTTON (BALE) 900.0 2,260,400.0 0.0

ELS COTTON (BALE) 2,100.0 125,000.0 0.0

1/ Minor Oilseeds & Pulses are in thousand units.

2/ CCC acquired 2019 Crop Year Upland (if not specified) and ELS cotton as a result of the following months' 

forfeited Marketing Assistance Loans:

12 bales from August 2020; 59 bales from September 2020; 120 bales from October; 135 Upland and 351 ELS bales 

from November; 876 Upland and 18 ELS bales from December; 48 bales from January; and 18 bales from March 

maturing loans. 

Following were multiple invitations that sold 12 bales in September; 59 bales in October; 77 bales in November;

 70 Upland bales and 351 ELS bales in December; 984 Upland bales and 18 ELS bales in January; 35 bales in March;

 and 520 bales in April. 

In total, there were 0 bales of cotton in inventory on April 30, 2021.

CCC also acquired 2019 Crop Year peanuts as a result of the following months' forfeited Marketing Assistance 

Loans:

20.55 tons from September 2020, 39.77 tons from October 2020, and 7.19 tons from January. 

Total CCC peanut forfeitures for Crop Year 2019 were 60.32 tons. CCC sold 20.55 tons from 

Invitation 20, 39.77 tons from Invitation 21, and 7.19 tons from Invitation 22. 

This brought the total CCC peanut inventory to 0.00 tons as of April 30, 2021. 

Report Completed: May 17, 2021
391 A.2d 696

#### Commonwealth v. Reno, Appellant.

Argued April 14,1978.

Richard P. Joseph and Sallie Ann Radick, for appellant; Donald E. Williams, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Order affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1








I, Susan B. Sheffield, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-3  (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  The Bank of New York Mellon.








By:/s/ Susan B. SheffieldName:Susan B. SheffieldTitle:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:March 3, 2023
* Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c), Kenneth S. Apfel is substituted for

John J. Callahan, former Acting Commissioner of Soc ial Security, as the defendant in this action.

** This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### MAY 14 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
MARGARET STERR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, *

Defendant-Appellee. No. 97-7136 (D.C. No. 96-CV-459-BU) (E.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT **

Before BALDOCK , EBEL , and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a dec ision on the briefs without oral-2-

argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ase is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Claimant Margaret Sterr appeals from the district c ourt’s order affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Social Securitydenying her application for disability benefits. Agency regulations establish a five-step sequential analysis to evaluate disability claims. See Williams v. Bowen , 844 F.2d 748, 750-52 (10th Cir. 1988) (describing five steps in detail). Here, the administrative law judge (ALJ) reached step four, determining that, du ring her period of eligibility for disability benefits, claimant could have return ed to her past relevant work. Claimant filed suit in district court and the distr ict court, adopting the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations, af firmed the agency’s denial of benefits. Our jurisdiction over this appeal ari ses from 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Our review of the agency’s decision is limited to d etermining whether the decision is supported by substantial evidence in th e record as a whole and whether the correct legal standards were applied. See Castellano v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs. , 26 F.3d 1027, 1028 (10th Cir. 1994). On appeal, claimant contends that 1) the ALJ failedto properly develop the record with regard to functional limitations result ing from removal of her bladder in 1985 due to cancer, and 2) therefore failed to m ake the proper findings regarding the requirements of claimant’s past relev ant work.-3-

After careful review of the record on appeal and af ter consideration of the parties’ briefs in light of the standards set out above, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the agency’s decision and that th e ALJ applied the correct legal standards. Further, the district court correctly d ecided this case. Therefore, for substantially the same reasons set forth in the mag istrate judge’s findings and recommendations, dated June 9, 1997, the judgment o f the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court
Michael R. Murphy Circuit Judge
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 11254 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
CATHERINE SALAS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:16

- CR

- 56

- 12

Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Catherine Salas has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Salas h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 4, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-11254 Document: 00514982439 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/04/2019No. 18

- 11254

2 Our review of the record reveals an error in the amount of the restitution
award. The judgment incorrectly states that J.D. is due restitution in the amount of $42,823. Based on the figures used to compute the restitution award at sentencing, J.D. is owed restitution in the amount of $42,822. The judgment correctly states that Lion Di amond Group, Incorporated is due restitution in the amount of $165,000. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. This matte r is REMANDED for the limited purpose of correcting the error in the judgment. See F ED . R. C RIM . P. 36. Case: 18-11254 Document: 00514982439 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/04/2019
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Committee on Strategy and Budget Task Force on Data Policies, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:

# DATE AND TIME: 

Thursday, April 19, from 4 p.m. to 5 p.m., EDT.

# SUBJECT MATTER: 

Discussion of a continuation of the National Science Board's focus on data policies.

# STATUS: 

Open.

# LOCATION: 

                        This meeting will be held by teleconference at the National Science Board Office, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. A public listening room will be available for this teleconference meeting. All visitors must contact the Board Office (call 703-292-7000 or send an email message to                         *nationalsciencebrd@nsf.gov*) at least 24 hours prior to the teleconference for the public room number and to arrange for a visitor's badge. All visitors must report to the NSF visitor desk located in the lobby at the 9th and N. Stuart Streets entrance on the day of the teleconference to receive a visitor's badge.                    

# UPDATES AND POINT OF CONTACT: 

                        Please refer to the National Science Board Web site                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb*                         for additional information and schedule updates (time, place, subject matter or status of meeting) may be found at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​notices/​*. Point of contact for this meeting is: Blane Dahl, National Science Board Office, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-7000.                    

Ann Bushmiller,

Senior Counsel to the National Science Board.

[FR Doc. 2012-8862 Filed 4-9-12; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
This is a draft document and does not represent a definitive view of the agency on the questions addressed. This and other guidance documents are accessible on the U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy web site at: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/guidance/default.aspx?pid=2&spid=1 . Guidance Type: Test Procedures Category: Residential Products Product: Central Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Sub P roduct: Split and package systems Guidance Version : DRAFT Issued: August 19 , 2014 Comment Period Ends: September 19 , 2014 The following is a draft U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) guidance document regarding the test procedure for central air conditioners . This draft guidance document represents the Department’s interpretation of its existing regulations and is exempt from the notice and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act. See 5 U.S.C. § 553(b)(A). Nonetheless, the Department is accepting comments and suggestions from the public until September 1 9 , 2014 . Comments and suggestions should be provided in WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, PDF, or text file format by sending an email to CACBlowerCoil2014GUID0033@ee.doe.gov . Please also include the docket number EERE - 2014 - BT - GUID - 0033 . Submitted comments are public and may be reviewed at Docket EERE - 2014 - BT - GUID - 0033 on regulations.gov ; if you wish to submit confidential business information as part of your comment, please contact DOE at the above email address . At the end of the comment period, this draft guidance document may be a dopted, revised, or withdrawn. Q: When can I test and rate a split - system central air conditioner with a blower - coil indoor unit? A: Split - system central air conditioners other than those with single - speed compressors may be tested and rated using a blower - coil only if the condensing unit is sold exclusively for use with a boiler - coil indoor unit. 10 CFR 429.16(a)(2)(ii). There is no provision in the C ode of F ederal R egulations (CFR) permitting use of a blower - coil for testing and rating a split - system central air conditioner where the condensing unit is also offered for sale with a coil - only indoor unit. Furthermore, there is no prov ision in the CFR permitting the use of a blower - coil for testing and rating a condensing unit with a single - speed compressor.
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: March 31, 2022 | By:    | /s/ Robert S. Prather, Jr.                           |
|----------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   | Robert S. Prather, Jr.                               |
|                 |   | Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |

----
Category Equipment or Activity Surrogate, Source of Data WinterSpringSummerAutumn

OnroadOnrd Mobile VMT from WSDOT 23.6 25.0 26.4 25.0

NonroadRecreational Boats Dry & Warm Days 0.0 25.0 43.3 31.6 NonroadFerries WA State Ferries Fuel Consumption 24.3 24.3 26.4 24.9 NonroadFishing Vessels Greater Vancouver Regional District, BC 0.0 14.3 56.0 29.7 NonroadConstruction Eq SIC 16 Employment 22.0 26.0 28.0 24.0 NonroadLogging Eqpt Logging Employment 23.0 26.0 27.0 24.0 NonroadFarm Eqpt Crop Production Employment 17.0 24.0 36.0 23.0 NonroadStg Veh, ATV, mpd, mcy, golf'Dry & Warm' Days 0.0 25.0 43.3 31.6 NonroadLawn & Garden, Lawn Care KA, observation 0.0 34.0 50.0 16.0 NonroadAircraft/Eqp, Refueling SeaTac Landing Rpt, 2002 23.2 25.0 27.7 24.1 NonroadShips, Tugs, Rail 365 days a year 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0

Area Resid/Comm Fossil & Wood KA, Space Heat Nat Gas Dist 47.8 33.0 4.9 14.4 Area Land C., Forest, Yard Waste DNR, Snoh Yd Waste Collection 16.0 24.0 30.0 30.0 Area Cutback Asphalt No summer application 32.0 34.0 0.0 34.0 Area Arch., Facility, Traffic Coat 'Dry & Warm' Days, DOT Schedule 0.0 25.0 43.3 31.6 Area Biogenics Biogenic Curve (1990) 12.0 21.0 46.0 21.0 Area Ind. Operations, Fossil 312 working days a year 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Area Gasoline Distribution WA State DOR Gasoline Sales 24.1 25.2 25.6 25.1 Area Structure Burn 365 days a year 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Area Utilities, Gas Flare, SGR 365 days a year 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Area DC, Refinishing 312 working days a year 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Area Degreasing, Graphic Arts 312 working days a year 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Area Misc Solv, Baking, Pesticides365 days a year 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Area Garbage, Recycle Burns 365 days a year 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Area Others 365 days a year 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0

Point Point Sources 312 working days a year 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0