alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1








I, Susan B. Sheffield, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of GM Financial Automobile Leasing Trust 2022-1  (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Computershare Trust Company, N.A.








By:/s/ Susan B. SheffieldName:Susan B. SheffieldTitle:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:March 4, 2024
#### Stephen L. ENGS, Petitioner, v. The DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY, and The State of Oklahoma, Respondents.

No. O-82-117.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

May 26, 1982.

*1036Stephen L. Engs, pro se.

David L. Moss, Dist. Atty., Tulsa County, Cary W. Clark, Asst. Dist. Atty., Tulsa, for respondents.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

The petitioner, Stephen L. Engs, has filed an application requesting that this Court dismiss a detainer and proceedings pending against him in the District Court of Tulsa County, on the State’s application to revoke the suspension of the judgments and sentences in Cases No. CRF-76-2081, CRF-76-2463, CRF-76-2464, CRF-76-2465, CRF-76-2466, CRF-76-2467, CRF-76-2468, CRF-76-2469 and, CRF-76-2470.

He alleges that at the time the detainer was filed he was an inmate at the Tennessee State Prison, and that pursuant to the Interstate Detainer Agreement he requested that a demand for trial be served on the District Court of Tulsa County. He avers that same was filed and has not been acted upon within the 180 days as set forth in the statute.

Although this Court has not addressed the specific issue that is now before us, other courts addressing the issue have consistently held that the act applies only to detainers based on an untried charge. In *Sable v. Ohio,*439 F.Supp. 905 (W.D.Okl., 1977), and in *Buchanan v. Michigan Department of Corrections,*50 Mich.App. 1, 212 N.W.2d 745 (1973), the courts ruled that detainers based on parole violations were not covered by the Act, since they were not based on untried charges. See also, *Suggs v. Hopper,*234 Ga. 242, 215 S.E.2d 246 (1975); *Blackwell v. State,*546 S.W.2d 828 (Tenn.Cr., 1976); *State v. Knowles,*270 S.E.2d 133 (S.C., 1980), and cases cited therein.

We find that the Interstate Detainer Act by its express terms applies to “untried” charges, and therefore, we hold that the Act does not apply to a detainer based on an application to revoke a suspended judgment and sentence.

Accordingly, the above styled and numbered petition of Stephen L. Engs, seeking the dismissal of a detainer and proceedings pending against him in the District Court of Tulsa County, is DENIED.

BRETT, P. J., and CORNISH, J., concur.
[Nos. 34973-2-I; 36407-3-I.

Division One.

June 17, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Bobby Lee Johnson, *Appellant. In the Matter of the Personal Restaint of*Bobby L. Johnson, *Petitioner.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-1-01813-9, Richard M. Ishikawa, J., entered July 11, 1994. *Affirmed*and *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Plum Creek Timber Company,Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), RickR. Holley, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13a or section 15d of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

(2)          The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of the Company.

 
|   | Date:  March 4, 2004              |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |                                   |   |
|   | By:                               | /s/  Rick R.  Holley |
|   |                                   |   |
|   | RICK R. HOLLEY                         |
|   |                                   |   |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 432

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the education curriculum in

the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 27, 2002

Mr. DAVIS of Florida (for himself, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. CROWLEY, Ms. ROSLEHTINEN, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. GILMAN,

Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. KING, Mr. LANTOS, and Mr. HYDE) submitted the

following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the education

curriculum in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Whereas the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, were carried out by 19 hijackers, including 15 Saudi Arabian nationals;

Whereas the Government of Saudi Arabia controls and regulates all forms of education in public and private schools

at all levels;

Whereas Islamic religious education is compulsory in public

and private schools at all levels;

Whereas the religious curriculum is written, monitored, and

taught by followers of the Wahhabi interpretation of
2

•HCON 432 IH

Islam, the only religion the Government of Saudi Arabia

allows to be taught;

Whereas rote memorization of religious texts continues to be

a central feature of much of the educational system of

Saudi Arabia, leaving thousands of students unprepared

to function in the global economy of the 21st century;

Whereas the Government of Saudi Arabia has tolerated elements within its education system that promote and encourage extremism;

Whereas some textbooks in Saudi Arabian schools foster a

combination of intolerance, ignorance, and anti-Semitic,

anti-American, and anti-Western views;

Whereas these intolerant views instilled in students make

them prime recruiting targets of extremist groups;

Whereas extremism is a danger to the stability of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Middle East region, and global

security;

Whereas the events of September 11, 2001, have created an

urgent need to promote moderate voices in the Islamic

world as an effective way to combat extremism; and

Whereas the Government of Saudi Arabia is currently conducting a review of its education curriculum: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) supports the review by the Government of

4 Saudi Arabia of its education curriculum;
3

•HCON 432 IH

1 (2) calls on the Government of Saudi Arabia to

2 ensure that such review is thorough, objective, and

3 public; and

4 (3) urges the Government of Saudi Arabia to

5 reform its education curriculum in a manner that

6 promotes tolerance, develops civil society, and en7 courages functionality in the global economy.

Æ
REASON FOR ISSUE

Temporary revision to advise the flight crew of the following:

• Revision of limitation for taxi lights.

• Addition of limitations for landing lights.

• Addition of a caution regarding landing light use.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR INSERTION OF THIS TEMPORARY REVISION

(1) Insert the Record of Temporary Revisions in the front portion of the Airplane Flight Manual.

(2) Insert the pages of this Temporary Revision in the Airplane Flight Manual as instructed at the

top of each page.

(3) Record the date of insertion of this Temporary Revision on the Record of Temporary

Revisions Page.

(4) Retain this page for record purposes.

LIST OF PAGES AFFECTED BY THIS TEMPORARY REVISION

• 02−08−2 and

• 04−16−1.

TEMPORARY REVISION TR 604/38 Page 1 of 3

Jun 16/14

DOT Approved CL−604 Airplane Flight Manual

PSP 604−1

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
ACTION

Replace paragraph 8. with the following:

8. TAXI AND LANDING LIGHTS

The taxi lights must be selected off whenever the airplane is stationary.

NOTE

During prolonged taxiing, the nose landing lights may be used in place

of the taxi lights, if necessary, at the pilot’s discretion.

The left and right landing lights must be selected off during taxi or when the airplane is stationary.

The left and right landing lights must not be used on the ground, except for the take-off roll and

landing.

TEMPORARY REVISION TR 604/38 Page 2 of 3

Jun 16/14

INSERT IN LIMITATIONS

FACING PAGE 02-08-2

Temporary revision to advise the flight crew of the following:

• Revision of limitation for taxi lights.

• Addition of limitations for landing lights.

• Addition of a caution regarding landing light use.

DOT Approved CL−604 Airplane Flight Manual

PSP 604−1

REASON FOR ISSUE
ACTION

Add the following CAUTION after paragraph 1.B.:

CAUTION

The left and right landing lights must not be used on the ground,

except for the take-off roll and landing.

TEMPORARY REVISION TR 604/38 Page 3 of 3

Jun 16/14

INSERT IN NORMAL PROCEDURES

FACING PAGE 04-16-1

Temporary revision to advise the flight crew of the following:

• Revision of limitation for taxi lights.

• Addition of limitations for landing lights.

• Addition of a caution regarding landing light use.

DOT Approved CL−604 Airplane Flight Manual

PSP 604−1

REASON FOR ISSUE
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**







**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #14-2004 L.P.
      (the
“Partnership”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Nancy J. McGurk, Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General Partner,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:







(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Partnership.










By:
            /s/
                Nancy J. McGurkName:
            Nancy
                J. McGurkTitle:
            Chief
                Financial OfficerDate:
            November
                14, 2005
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 555 

Recognizing the freedom of Muslims of the United States to exercise their 

religion and participate in the civil systems of their country. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 20, 2018 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. FLAKE) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the freedom of Muslims of the United States 

to exercise their religion and participate in the civil systems of their country. 

Whereas the First Amendment to the Constitution of the 

United States guarantees religious freedom to people of 

all faiths; 

Whereas article VI of the Constitution of the United States 

asserts that no religious test may be required for public 

office, ensuring that people of all faiths may serve their 

country; 

Whereas the United States has always valued the right of individuals to practice their faith as they please, and religious freedom is fundamental to the national character of 

the United States; 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 555 ATS 

Whereas people of the United States of all faiths, including 

Muslims, both immigrant and native-born and from a variety of races and ethnicities, have made valuable contributions to the United States throughout its history; 

Whereas more than 3,000,000 Muslims now reside in the 

United States; 

Whereas Muslims have served in the Armed Forces of the 

United States for generations, with more than 5,000 

Muslims currently serving and many having made the ultimate sacrifice for the United States; 

Whereas Muslim scientists and researchers in the United 

States have helped expand the understanding of medicine, engineering, and outer space; 

Whereas Muslim inventors in the United States have made 

breakthroughs ranging from brain tumor treatments to 

the creation of the ice cream cone; 

Whereas Muslim athletes have represented the United States 

in the Olympics and in most professional sports leagues; 

Whereas Muslim entrepreneurs and business leaders in the 

United States have helped shape industries including financial services, food, transportation, cosmetics, and furniture; 

Whereas countless Muslims contribute to the economy and 

well-being of the United States as business owners, firefighters, police officers, physicians, laborers, service workers, and teachers; and 

Whereas Muslims have served as Members of Congress, Ambassadors of the United States, and other types of public 

servants: Now, therefore, be it 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 555 ATS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate recognizes the religious 

2 freedom of Muslims of the United States and their civic 

3 contributions to the United States. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: Subject: Lowry, Nick (OST) Thursday, February 14, 2013 1:53 PM Alec Bramlett (alec.bramlett@aa.com) B. Edelman (bedelman@hbs.edu); Podberesky, Samuel (OST); Graber, Kimberly (OST); Dockets Mail B. Edelman v. American Airlines, Motion for Extension; Dkt DOT OST 2013-0024
This notice is In reference your motionof February 8, 2013. By a motion dated February 8, 2013, Counsel for American Airlines, Inc., requested an extension of time in which to prepare an answer in the above-referenced third-party complaint to March 22, 2013. The Respondent's motion advises thatthe Complainantwas contacted and has no objectionto grantofthe request. 

### This office has decided to grantfor good cause the requested extension. This notice is issued under authority assigned in 14CFR 302.405(a). Noteto Dockets: Please place this e-mail in Dkt DOT-OST-2013-0024.

Nicholas Lowry SeniorAttorney Office ofAviation Enforcement& 

### Proceedings Oflice ofthe General Counsel U.S. Dept. ofTransport'ltion 202-366-9351 (ph)

1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1275

LOUISE BIGGERS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; GOVERNMENT 

NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for Securitized Trust 

Ginnie Mae Remic Trust 2011-002; GINNIE MAE; WELLS FARGO HOME 

MORTGAGE; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC, 

a/k/a MERS; DOES 1 THROUGH 100, inclusive,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:16-cv-00431-JAG)

Submitted: May 25, 2017 Decided: May 30, 2017

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louise Biggers, Appellant Pro Se. Terry Catherine Frank, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, 

PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Louise Biggers appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint seeking 

to forestall the foreclosure of her home for failure to state a claim and as barred by res 

judicata. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. 

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Biggers’ informal brief does not challenge the district 

court’s dispositive conclusion that her claims are barred by res judicata, Biggers has 

forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 

423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (Nos. 333-20093, 333-62701, 333-45180, 333-68412, 333-82158, and 333-109135)
and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-11939, 333-62491, 333-11941, 333-45208, 333-107314 and
333-126719) of LifeCell Corporation of our reportdated February 28, 2007
relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form
10-K.







PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP


Florham
Park, NJ


February
26, 2008
Exhibit 31.1

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION



I, John C. Roman, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



Date: November 12,
2004



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ John C. Roman                    
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
391 A.2d 692

#### Commonwealth v. Derrick Mays, Appellant.

Submitted March 30, 1977.

Elaine DeMasse and Anne Skwiersky, Assistant Defenders, for appellant; William C. Turnoff and Robert B. Lawler, Assistant District Attorneys, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgments of sentence affirmed.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.