Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2012 / Notices 21963 

1See Antidumping Duty Orders; Certain Stainless 

Steel Plate in Coils From Belgium, Canada, Italy, 

the Republic of Korea, South Africa, and Taiwan, 

64 FR 27756 (May 21, 1999), amended by Notice of 

Amended Antidumping Duty Orders; Certain 

Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From Belgium, 

Canada, Italy, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, 

and Taiwan, 68 FR 11520 (March 11, 2003); Notice 

of Amended Antidumping Duty Orders; Certain 

Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From Belgium, 

Canada, Italy, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, 

and Taiwan, 68 FR 16117 (April 2, 2003); and 

Notice of Correction to the Amended Antidumping 

Duty Orders; Certain Stainless Steel Plate in Coils 

From Belgium, Canada, Italy, the Republic of Korea, 

South Africa, and Taiwan, 68 FR 20114 (April 24, 

2003). 

2See Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From Belgium: 

Notice of Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review, 76 FR 45511 (July 29, 2011). 

3See Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Belgium: 

Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Changed Circumstances Review 76 FR 66271 

(October 26, 2011) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 

4The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file electronically via 

Import Administration’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 

System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’). IA ACCESS is available in 

the Central Records Unit, main Commerce Building, 

Room 7046. In addition, a complete version of the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/. The 

signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and 

electronic version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

subject to sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

administrative review and notice in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: April 3, 2012. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2012–8863 Filed 4–11–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–423–808] 

Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From 

Belgium: Notice of Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the ‘‘Department’’) has determined that 

Aperam Stainless Belgium N.V. 

(‘‘Aperam’’) is the successor-in-interest 

to ArcelorMittal Stainless Belgium N.V. 

(‘‘AMSB’’). As a result, Aperam will be 

accorded the same treatment previously 

accorded AMSB with regard to the 

antidumping duty order on stainless 

steel plate in coils from Belgium (‘‘SSPC 

from Belgium’’), effective as of the date 

of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register. 

DATES: Effective April 12, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

George McMahon or Stephanie Moore, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1167 and (202) 

482–3692, respectively. 

Background 

On May 21, 1999, the Department 

published in the Federal Register an 

antidumping duty order on stainless 

steel plate in coils from Belgium.1 On 

June 14, 2011, Aperam filed a request 

for a changed circumstances review of 

the antidumping duty order on SSPC 

from Belgium. Aperam claimed that it is 

the successor-in-interest to AMSB and 

should be treated as such for purposes 

of the antidumping duty order. 

On July 29, 2011, the Department 

published its initiation of the instant 

changed circumstances review of the 

antidumping duty order on SSPC from 

Belgium.2

On October 26, 2011, the Department 

published its preliminary results of 

changed circumstances review of the 

AD Order on SSPC from Belgium.3 The 

Department preliminarily determined 

that Aperam is the successor-in-interest 

to AMSB and should be treated as such 

for purposes of the antidumping duty 

order. In the Preliminary Results, we 

stated that interested parties could 

submit case briefs to the Department no 

later than 30 days after the publication 

of the Preliminary Results in the Federal 

Register, and submit rebuttal briefs 

seven days subsequent to the due date 

of the case briefs. Aperam submitted a 

case brief on November 23, 2011, and no 

interested parties submitted a rebuttal 

brief. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

The issue raised in Aperam’s case 

brief is addressed in the ‘‘Issues and 

Decision Memorandum for the Final 

Results of the Changed Circumstances 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 

on Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from 

Belgium,’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, to 

Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 

Import Administration, (‘‘Issues and 

Decision Memorandum’’),4 dated 

concurrently with this notice and which 

is hereby adopted by this notice. A list 

of the issues which parties have raised, 

and to which we have responded in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum, is 

attached to this notice as an Appendix. 

Scope of the Antidumping Duty Order 

The product covered by this order is 

certain stainless steel plate in coils. 

Stainless steel is an alloy steel 

containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or 

less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more 

of chromium, with or without other 

elements. The subject plate products are 

flat-rolled products, 254 mm or over in 

width and 4.75 mm or more in 

thickness, in coils, and annealed or 

otherwise heat treated and pickled or 

otherwise descaled. The subject plate 

may also be further processed (e.g., 

cold-rolled, polished, etc.) provided that 

it maintains the specified dimensions of 

plate following such processing. 

Excluded from the scope of this order 

are the following: (1) Plate not in coils; 

(2) Plate that is not annealed or 

otherwise heat treated and pickled or 

otherwise descaled; (3) Sheet and strip; 

and (4) Flat bars. 

The merchandise subject to this order 

is currently classifiable in the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) at 

subheadings: 7219.11.00.30, 

7219.11.00.60, 7219.12.00.06, 

7219.12.00.21, 7219.12.00.26, 

7219.12.00.51, 7219.12.00.56, 

7219.12.00.66, 7219.12.00.71, 

7219.12.00.81, 7219.31.00.10, 

7219.90.00.10, 7219.90.00.20, 

7219.90.00.25, 7219.90.00.60, 

7219.90.00.80, 7220.11.00.00, 

7220.20.10.10, 7220.20.10.15, 

7220.20.10.60, 7220.20.10.80, 

7220.20.60.05, 7220.20.60.10, 

7220.20.60.15, 7220.20.60.60, 

7220.20.60.80, 7220.90.00.10, 

7220.90.00.15, 7220.90.00.60, and 

7220.90.00.80. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise 

subject to these orders is dispositive. 

Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review 

Based on the information provided by 

Aperam, the Department’s analysis in 

the Preliminary Results (which we 

incorporate herein by reference), and in 

light of the fact that no interested parties 

submitted any comments on the 

Department’s preliminary finding with 

respect to Aperam, the Department 

hereby determines that Aperam is the 

successor-in-interest to AMSB and is 

entitled to AMSB’s treatment under the 

order. The Department will rely on the 

date of the publication of these final 

results of the instant changed 

circumstances review in the Federal 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

21964 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2012 / Notices 

1See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 76 FR 

70705 (November 15, 2011) (Preliminary Results). 

2Petitioners filed an extension request for filing 

their rebuttal brief until December 22, 2011, and the 

Department granted the extension request. 

3See Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the 

People’s Republic of China: Extension of Time Limit 

for Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper 

Review, 77 FR 4990 (February 1, 2012). 

4See Hiep Thanh Seafood Joint Stock Co. v. 

United States, Consol. Court No. 09–00270, Slip 

Op. 12–19 (February 15, 2012). 

5See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of the Third 

New Shipper Reviews, 74 FR 29473 (June 22, 2009), 

and Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam: Amended Final Results of 

New Shipper Review 74 FR 37188 (July 28, 2009). 

Register as the effective date of this 

determination. 

Instructions to U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection 

We will instruct U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection to apply the cashdeposit rate in effect for AMSB to all 

entries of the subject merchandise from 

Aperam that were entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication of these final results of the 

changed circumstances review. 

Notifications 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of doubled antidumping duties. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

notification of the destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) and (2) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 

and 19 CFR 351.216(e). 

Dated: April 4, 2012. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix I 

List of Comments in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum 

Comment 1: Retroactive Application of the 

Final Results 

[FR Doc. 2012–8864 Filed 4–11–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–898] 

Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On November 15, 2011, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published in the Federal 

Register the preliminary rescission of 

the antidumping duty new shipper 

review (NSR) of chlorinated 

isocyanurates from the People’s 

Republic of China (PRC) for Heze Huayi 

Chemical Co. Ltd. (Heze Huayi).1 We 

gave interested parties an opportunity to 

comment on the preliminary rescission. 

Based on our analysis of the comments 

received, we now are assigning Heze 

Huayi its own rate for these final results. 

See ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section 

below. 

DATES: Effective April 12, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jun 

Jack Zhao, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

6, Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1396. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We 

preliminarily rescinded the NSR for 

Heze Huayi on November 15, 2011. See 

Preliminary Results. In the preliminary 

rescission notice, the Department stated 

that interested parties were to submit 

case briefs within 30 days of publication 

of the Preliminary Results and rebuttal 

briefs within five days after the due date 

for filing case briefs. We received a case 

brief from Heze Huayi on December 16, 

2011; we received a rebuttal brief from 

the Clearon Corp. and Occidental 

Chemical Corporation (collectively, 

Petitioners) on December 22, 2011.2 On 

December 15, 2011, we received a 

hearing request from Heze Huayi, 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c). Also on 

December 15, 2011, Petitioners filed a 

request to participate in a hearing 

should one be requested by another 

party. On January 18, 2012, we 

conducted a closed session hearing 

concerning Heze Huayi’s unreported 

sales that led to the Department’s 

preliminary rescission of the NSR. On 

February 1, 2012, the Department 

extended the time limit for the final 

results of the NSR.3 On February 22, 

2012, Heze Huayi submitted a ‘‘Notice 

of New Authority’’ following the U.S. 

Court of International Trade (CIT) 

opinion 4 concerning the final results of 

the third NSR of the antidumping duty 

order of certain frozen fish fillets from 

the Socialist Republic of Vietnam,5

Petitioners filed a rebuttal response to 

the ‘‘Notice of New Authority’’ 

submission on February 29, 2012. 

Period of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.214(g), the 

period of review (POR) for this NSR is 

June 1, 2010, through December 31, 

2010. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

chlorinated isocyanurates, which are 

derivatives of cyanuric acid, described 

as chlorinated s-triazine triones. There 

are three primary chemical 

compositions of chlorinated 

isocyanurates: (1) Trichloroisocyanuric 

acid (Cl3(NCO)3), (2) sodium 

dichloroisocyanurate (dihydrate) 

(NaCl2(NCO)3(2H2O), and (3) sodium 

dichloroisocyanurate (anhydrous) 

(NaCl2(NCO)3). Chlorinated 

isocyanurates are available in powder, 

granular, and tableted forms. The order 

covers all chlorinated isocyanurates. 

Chlorinated isocyanurates are 

currently classifiable under subheadings 

2933.69.6015, 2933.69.6021, 

2933.69.6050, 3808.40.50, 3808.50.40 

and 3808.94.5000 of the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS). The tariff classification 

2933.69.6015 covers sodium 

dichloroisocyanurates (anhydrous and 

dihydrate forms) and 

trichloroisocyanuric acid. The tariff 

classifications 2933.69.6021 and 

2933.69.6050 represent basket categories 

that include chlorinated isocyanurates 

and other compounds including an 

unfused triazine ring. Although the 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES