alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T HE U NITED B UILDING

77 W EST W ACKER D RIVE

C HICAGO

, IL 60601 D AN W EISS

M ANAGING D IRECTOR

, I NTERNATIONAL A FFAIRS & R EGULATORY

P HONE /F AX : ( 312) 997

-

7573

DAN

. WEISS @ COAIR

. COM

July 1 9 , 2012

Mr. Paul L. Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation

Department of Tran sportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application and Notice o f GoJet, Mesa, SkyWest and Shuttle America

(COPA share share)

Docket DOT

- OST

- 2012

- xxx

Dear M r. Gretch :

United has completed its poll of carrier representativ es i n the attached service list. No carrier

objects to the ap prov al of GoJet, Mesa, Shuttle America and SkyWest ’s application to code share with

COPA . United asks that th e requested authorit ies be awarded promptly so that the carriers can secure

foreign author ity, make final operating plans and begin marketing the se services

.

Respectful ly submitted

,

D an W eiss

Managing Director, International Affairs & Regulatory

UNITED AIR LINES, INC.

cc: Esta Rosenberg

Robert Finamore

John R. Mie t us, Jr.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing document on all

persons named below by causi ng a copy to be sent via email.

msinick@ssd.com (Alaska)

carl.nelson@aa.com

francis.heil@aa.com

james.kaleigh@aa.com

robert.wirick@aa.com

rsilverberg@sgbdc.com (ABX/ Air Transport Intl.) jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com (Amerijet) jcanny@amerijet.c om

stephen.lachter@lachterlaw.com (ASTAR) rpommer@atlasair.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

charters@evergreenairlines.com (Evergreen)

cefelts@fedex.com

anbird@fedex.com

nsspar ks@fedex.com

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com ( Frontier ) patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com ( Frontier ) jhill@dow lohnes.com (Hawaiian/JetBlue)

matwood@cozen.com (Kalitta) kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com

bob.kneisley@wnc o.com

leslie.abbott@wnco.com

dkirstein@yklaw.com (Spirit) jyoung@yklaw.com (Spirit) john.fredericksen@suncountry.com

anita.mosner@hklaw.com (UPS) jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com (UPS) howard.kass@usairways.com

jegillick@zsrlaw.com (Virgin America) john.varley@virginamerica.com

mlbenge@zsrlaw.c om (World) william.stallings@usdoj.gov

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

john.allen@faa.gov

Annalei Ava nceña

International Regulatory Advisor

July 1 9 , 2012
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-50017 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAIME GARCIA-GOMEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-00-CR-391-1

--------------------

August 23, 2001

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jaime Garcia-Gomez appeals the 57-month term of imprisonment

imposed following his guilty plea conviction of attempting to

illegally reenter the United States after removal in violation of

8 U.S.C. § 1326. Garcia-Gomez argues that his sentence should

not have exceeded the two-year maximum term of imprisonment

prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Garcia-Gomez acknowledges that

his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but
No. 01-50017 

-2-

seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of

the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). GarciaGomez’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

 AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 665 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 665

   Designating October 2018 as ``National Employee Ownership Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 2 (legislative day, September 28), 2018

Ms. Baldwin (for herself, Mr. Roberts, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Van 
Hollen, Mr. Reed, Mr. Brown, Mr. King, Mrs. Murray, Ms. Klobuchar, Mrs. 
   Shaheen, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Young, and Mr. Sanders) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Designating October 2018 as ``National Employee Ownership Month''.

Whereas employee-owned companies give workers a voice in corporate governance, 
        and that voice helps the long-term well-being of the company;
Whereas employee-owned companies often outperform non-employee-owned companies 
        and show greater resiliency during challenging economic conditions;
Whereas employee-owned companies face lower staff turnover, and workers 
        experience greater job security at those companies;
Whereas employee-owners feel better prepared to cover the expenses of life and 
        retire with a greater sense of financial security; and
Whereas employee-owned companies have a rich history in communities across the 
        United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates October 2018 as ``National Employee 
        Ownership Month'';
            (2) supports employee-owned businesses; and
            (3) acknowledges that employee-owned companies have a 
        positive impact on workers, businesses, and communities.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1  Certifications  I, Mike Mckeever, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-P1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d- 18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following  unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Computershare Trust Company, National  Association.  Date: March 29, 2023  Mike Mckeever   President   Carvana Receivables Depositor LLC   (senior officer in charge of securitization)  /s/ Mike Mckeever
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1518

THERESA M. YOUNG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

MARY SEYMOUR,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:22-cv-00241-DKC)

Submitted: August 24, 2023 Decided: August 28, 2023

Before QUATTLEBAUM and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theresa M. Young, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1518 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Theresa M. Young appeals the district court’s orders disposing of several motions, 

including Defendant’s motion to dismiss Young’s claims for libel, defamation, and slander, 

which the district court granted, and denying Young’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. On 

appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 

34(b). Because Young’s informal brief fails to meaningfully challenge the district court’s 

rationale for dismissing her claims, Young has forfeited appellate review of the court’s 

disposition. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal 

brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues 

preserved in that brief.”). To the extent Young challenges the district court’s refusal to 

appoint her counsel, we discern no abuse of discretion in this ruling. Finally, to the extent 

Young seeks to raise new claims for the first time on appeal, she may not do so. Brown v. 

Am. Broad. Co., 704 F.2d 1296, 1303 (4th Cir. 1983). We therefore affirm the district 

court’s orders. Young v. United States, No. 8:22-cv-00241-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 16, 2023; 

Apr. 6, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1518 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 46

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding chiropractic health care

benefits.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 1, 2001

Mr. MANZULLO submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding chiropractic

health care benefits.

Whereas chiropractic is a major health discipline which originated in the United States, the development of which was

begun by Dr. D.D. Palmer and his son Dr. B.J. Palmer

on September 18, 1895;

Whereas chiropractic is the third largest doctoral level health

care profession, behind medicine and dentistry;

Whereas approximately 28,000,000 Americans visit a doctor

of chiropractic every year;

Whereas research has demonstrated chiropractic care to be

safe and effective;

Whereas, while many State licensing boards authorize the

practice of spinal manipulation by physicians and other
2

•HCON 46 IH

providers, doctors of chiropractic are the only providers

educated and trained specifically to perform chiropractic

adjustments to correct vertebral subluxations;

Whereas chiropractic is recognized as an integral part of the

American health care system through most managed

health care and insurance programs;

Whereas in 1991 an estimated 85 percent of employers with

health coverage plans provided chiropractic coverage, and

by 1996 43 States required health plans to provide some

form of chiropractic coverage;

Whereas in 1972 Congress included doctors of chiropractic in

the definition of physician under medicare, permitting

them to provide beneficiaries with chiropractic care; and

Whereas, under traditional fee-for-service medicare, beneficiaries are given direct access to doctors of chiropractic:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 Federal Government should make the benefits of chiro4 practic care available as a covered benefit in any Federal

5 employees health plan, consistent with the following basic

6 principles:

7 (1) Chiropractic care includes diagnosis, correc8 tion, and management of either vertebral

9 subluxations or neuromusculoskeletal conditions per10 formed by a licensed doctor of chiropractic, and

11 should not include the use of drugs or surgery.
3

•HCON 46 IH

1 (2) Doctors of chiropractic are the only pro2 viders educated and trained to perform chiropractic

3 adjustments to correct vertebral subluxations, and as

4 such, chiropractic adjustments should be provided

5 only by a licensed doctor of chiropractic.

6 (3) The scope of chiropractic practice should be

7 based on State law.

8 (4) Like beneficiaries under medicare, Federal

9 employees should have direct access to chiropractic

10 care without the requirement of a referral.

11 (5) Participation in any Federal employees

12 health plan should be open to any licensed doctor of

13 chiropractic who wishes to participate.

Æ
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 10, 2012 / Presidential Documents 21389 

Presidential Determination No. 2012–06 of April 3, 2012 

Unexpected Urgent Refugee and Migration Needs 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States, including section 2(c)(1) of the Migration and 

Refugee Assistance Act of 1962 (the ‘‘Act’’), as amended, (22 U.S.C. 

2601(c)(1)), I hereby determine, pursuant to section 2(c)(1) of the Act, that 

it is important to the national interest to furnish assistance under the Act, 

in an amount not to exceed $26 million from the United States Emergency 

Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund, for the purpose of meeting unexpected and urgent refugee and migration needs, including by contributions 

to international, governmental, and nongovernmental organizations and payment of administrative expenses of the Bureau of Population, Refugees, 

and Migration of the Department of State, related to the humanitarian crisis 

resulting from conflict in South Kordofan and Blue Nile States of Sudan. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, April 3, 2012 

[FR Doc. 2012–8674 

Filed 4–9–12; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES6OB#1.EPS</GPH>
Exhibit 32.2**POLYPORE, INC.****CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polypore, Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Lynn Amos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, doeshereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        November 14, 2006           /s/ Lynn Amos   Lynn Amos   Chief Financial Officer
jj^-'.

_^^s 3



### DESARROU O INTEGRADO , S . AD E C . V . 1 o who m i t ma yconcern ; Thi s tette rts t o certif ytha t o fthi s dat e i n tti e recor d book s o fth e cwnpany , th e reg^te r^arehokJer s o f100 % o frt s i^ue d an d pai d i n capita l o fD^arrotl o Integracto , S . Ad e C . V . ar e th e followin g mexica n citJ^er^ : Robert o Zambran o Villarrea l Maurkri o Zambran o Villarrea l Davi d Zamt^an o Villarrea l Danie l Zambran o Viltarrea f Norm a Zambrarr o d e Fernande z GulHerm o Manue l Zambfan o Vtllarrea t Laur a Zambran o d e Kan e Andre s Zambrar wVillarrea l Rodolf o Zambran o Villanrea l

Integrado , S . Ad e C . V . i s a compan yirtcorp^^ate d unde rth e Mexic o s law s ttie 5 * o fftovembe r197 5 an d registere d unde rNo . 2 , pag e 295 , vdum e 213 , boo k

Ho . 3 a t th e Register s Offic e t n Mor^rr^ , N.L . M^xkx ) th e 7 * o fJanuaryo f1976 . Monterrey , N.L . a s o fth e 27 ^ o fNovembe ro f200 9 Desarroll o Integrack) ^ S . A . d e C . V . GuilteriTi d Marvtte l Zambran o Villarrea l
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rocky David MARROW, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 80CA0262.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

Dec. 3, 1981.

J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Hennessey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Mary J. Mullarkey, Sol. Gen., Robert C. Lehnert, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-ap-pellee.

J. Gregory Walta, Colorado State Public Defender, Margaret L. O’Leary, Gerald E. Piper, Deputy State Public Defenders, Denver, for defendant-appellant.

COYTE, Judge.

Defendant appeals from an order revoking his probation and sentencing him to the state reformatory. We affirm.

On February 7, 1980, defendant appeared in the district court on the return of a bench warrant. The warrant had been issued because of the defendant’s violation of various terms of his probation. On February 15,1980, at the request of defense counsel, the court continued the hearing until February 22, 1980.

On February 21, 1980, the People filed an amended complaint adding an additional count, the factual basis of which was learned by the district attorney following the filing of the original complaint. Defense counsel did not receive the amended complaint until the morning of February 22, 1980.

At the hearing that day, defense counsel asserted that because of the late filing of the amended complaint, he was not prepared to defend against the new allegations and thus objected at the hearing to the admission of any evidence relating to the amended complaint. He also objected to any continuance and wanted to proceed solely on the original complaint. The court determined that it would proceed on the amended complaint and thus ordered a continuance until March 7, 1980.

*843On February 28, 1980, the defendant moved to dismiss the complaint alleging that more than 15 days had passed before the revocation hearing contrary to the provisions of § 16-11-206, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8), which provides:

> “If the petitioner is in custody, the hearing shall be held within 15 days after the filing of the complaint unless a delay or continuance is granted by the court ... for good cause found by the court justifying further delay.”

After a hearing, the court denied the motion finding that there was good cause for the delay as the defendant needed additional time to respond to the allegations in the amended complaint.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred by revoking his probation because the revocation hearing was not held within the 15 day period. We disagree.

A finding of good cause for a continuance is within the discretion of the trial court and will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion. *See People v. Zimmerman,*Colo.App., 616 P.2d 997 (1980). In light of the late filing of the amended complaint and the consequent lack of preparation by defense counsel, we find no abuse of discretion here.

In view of the conclusions we have reached, it is not necessary to consider the other assignments of error.

Judgment affirmed.

STERNBERG and KIRSHBAUM, JJ., concur.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 402

Commending the establishment of the President’s New Freedom Commission

on Mental Health, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 14, 2002

Ms. KAPTUR (for herself, Mrs. ROUKEMA, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island, Mr.

NORWOOD, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. GREENWOOD, and Mr. SMITH of New Jersey) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Energy and Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending the establishment of the President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, and for other purposes.

Whereas 18 to 20 percent of the population of the United

States have a diagnosable mental illness;

Whereas 4 of the 10 leading causes of disability in the United

States are mental disorders;

Whereas untreated mental illness too often leads to family

breakdown, lost productivity, unemployment, homelessness, drug and alcohol addiction, or incarceration;

Whereas numerous Federal, State, and local governmental

entities oversee mental health services through a diverse
2

•HCON 402 IH

and complex network of public and private providers and

delivery systems;

Whereas more efficient organization and coordination could

assist these providers in ensuring that effective treatment

is received by those individuals most in need;

Whereas improvements in coordination and quality of services

are greatly needed by all aspects of the public and private

mental health system;

Whereas recommendations are needed for improvements to

enable adults with serious mental illness and children

with serious emotional disturbances to live, work, learn,

and participate fully in their communities; and

Whereas in the United States, millions of people and their

families live every day with mental illness, and untreated

mental illness is a great national problem: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) it is the sense of the Congress that improving the

4 Nation’s mental health service delivery system for individ5 uals with serious mental illness and children with serious

6 emotional disturbance is a national priority; and

7 (2) the Congress commends the establishment of the

8 President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health.

Æ
Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 IVAX DIAGNOSTICS, INC. 
  
 July 13, 2005 
  
 Giorgio D’Urso 
 c/o IVAX Diagnostics, Inc. 
 2140 N. Miami Avenue 
 Miami, FL 33137 
  

	Re:	Employment Agreement, dated October 1, 1998, as amended February 24, 2004 (the “Agreement”) 

  
 Dear Mr. D’Urso: 
  
 As you are aware, we are parties to the Agreement, which sets forth the terms and conditions of your employment by IVAX
Diagnostics, Inc. (the “Company”). Terms not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement. 
  
 The Term of the Agreement is currently set to expire on February 24, 2006. As previously discussed, both you and the Company desire to extend the Term for
an additional four (4) years on the same terms and conditions stated in the Agreement. Accordingly, the new expiration date of the Term will be February 24, 2010. 
  
 If the foregoing correctly sets forth our agreement, please sign this letter in the space indicated below and return a
signed copy to my attention. 
  

			
	Sincerely,
	
	IVAX Diagnostics, Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Duane Steele


	 	 	Duane Steele,
	 	 	Vice President –
	 	 	Business Development


  

	
	Accepted and agreed to by:
	
	 /s/ Giorgio D’Urso


	Giorgio D’Urso