alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Patrick Bratton, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 12, 2011



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Patrick Bratton    
|    |  | Patrick Bratton        
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 37

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

07/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0108

_____________________________

ANTHONY GEORGE BROWN II,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

March 6, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and ROBERTS and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Tyler Kemper Payne, 

Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Darcy Townsend, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
----

**Exhibit      32.2**

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATION**

|   | (1)    | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|   | (2)    | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

|   |   | /s/                Jack J. Sandoski      |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Jack                J. Sandoski          |   |
|   |   | Senior                Vice President and |   |
|   |   | Chief                Financial Officer   |   |
|   |   | May                15, 2007              |   |

*A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Abington Community Bancorp, Inc. and      will be retained by Abington Community Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 234 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 234

 Expressing the sense of Congress relating to the increased importance 
  of the United States steel industry since the attacks on the United 
                     States on September 11, 2001.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 2001

Mrs. Jones of Ohio submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 
 was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition 
    to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period of time to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress relating to the increased importance 
  of the United States steel industry since the attacks on the United 
                     States on September 11, 2001.

Whereas on September 11, 2001, acts of treacherous violence were committed 
        against the United States and its citizens;
Whereas the United States steel industry has been weakened by the availability 
        of illegal increased quantities of steel being imported into the United 
        States by foreign businesses; and
Whereas in this time of crisis it is important that the United States does not 
        rely on steel imported from foreign countries: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in light of the attacks on the United States on September 11, 
2001, it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) the United States steel industry is vital to the 
        national security interests of the United States; and
            (2) the United States should place a priority on using 
        steel produced in the United States in order to help rebuild 
        our Nation and support any future military efforts in response 
        to such attacks.
                                 <all>
```
U. S. Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF COTTON

FOR RELEASE AT 1:00 P.M. CT January 16, 2020

USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of Cotton. The cotton bales were sold under 

Invitation 2020U0024 dated January 16, 2020.

Invitation 2020U0024

Catalog 

Lot No. Catalog Location Purchaser Pounds Sold 

Price Sold 

(per 

Pound)

CCC Revenue 

2 DUMAS, AR Brighann Marketing Inc 128,002 0.5204 $ 66,612.24 

3 DUMAS, AR Brighann Marketing Inc 37,169 0.5154 $ 19,156.90 

5 DUMAS, AR MemTex Cotton Marketing, 

LLC. 46,069 0.5050 $ 23,264.85 

18 BROWNSVILLE, TN Brighann Marketing Inc 92,811 0.5534 $ 51,361.61 

21 BROWNSVILLE, TN ECOM USA 52,972 0.5920 $ 31,359.42 

22 BROWNSVILLE, TN ECOM USA 23,028 0.5970 $ 13,747.72 

25 JACKSON, TN Brighann Marketing Inc 104,271 0.5504 $ 57,390.76 

484,322 $262,893.50
U. S. Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF COTTON

FOR RELEASE AT 2:00 P.M. CT February 7, 2020

USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of Cotton. The cotton bales were sold under 

Invitation 2020U0036 dated February 7, 2020.

Invitation 2020U0036

Catalog Lot 

No. 

Catalog 

Location Purchaser Pounds Sold 

Price Sold (per 

Pound) CCC Revenue 

4 EL CAMPO, TX ACG Cotton Marketing LLC 23,511 0.4819 $11,329.95 

23,511 $11,329.95
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7401

IRVING FOYE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES M. CONDON, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofSouth Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-00-912-9-17RB) Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: March 1, 2001 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Irving Foye, Appellant Pro Se. Derrick K. McFarland, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Irving Foye seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Foye v. South Carolina , No. CA-00-912-9-17RB (D.S.C. filed Sept. 11, 2000; entered Sept. 12, 2000). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, CoreyHenry, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2022-1(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement inall material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included inthis report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank,N.A. 

 
By: 
/s/ Corey Henry
Name: Corey HenryTitle: 
President and Chief Executive Officer

SantanderDrive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor
 (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date: March 31, 2023**
BE Apple Crop Summary

BE Apple Events in the Food Supply

BE Event Trait Producing 

Countries Comments FDA Review

GD743 non-browning Canada, United 

States

Trade name: 

ArcticTM Golden 

Delicious

BNF-132

GS784 non-browning Canada, United 

States

Trade name:

ArcticTM Granny 

Smith

BNF-132

NF872 non-browning Canada, United 

States

Trade name: 

ArcticTM Fuji BNF-154

BE Apple Production

BE apples are in commercial production only in the United States. BE apples have also been 

approved for commercial production in Canada, but no trees have been planted yet. The first 

BE apple trees were planted in 2015 and current production is relatively minor. As of October 

2017, Okanagan Specialty Fruits had planted 250 acres of BE apples, and expected to reach 

1400 acres by 2019 (MIT Technology review, 2017). BE apple versions have been developed for 

three apple cultivars: Golden Delicious, Granny Smith and Fuji. All other apple cultivars may be 

presumed not to be BE apples.

BE Apple Food Safety Reviews

An FDA biotechnology consultation has been completed for ArcticTM Golden Delicious and 

ArcticTM Granny Smith in the United States (FDA, 2018) and a food safety review by Health 

Canada in Canada (Health Canada, 2015). Health Canada has also completed the food safety 

review for ArcticTM Fuji (Health Canada, 2018); however, the FDA biotechnology consultation for 

ArcticTM Fuji has not yet been completed.

References

FDA (2018) Biotechnology Consultations on Food from GE Plant Varieties

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fdcc/?set=Biocon

Health Canada (2015) Novel Food Information – Arctic Apple Events GD743 and GS784

Health Canada (2018) Novel Food Information Arctic Fuji Apple Event NF872

MIT Technology Review (2017) GM Apples That Don’t Brown to Reach U.S. Shelves This Fall.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v. BRIAN JOHN PARDO , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 22

- 0183 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2015

- 002384

- 001 The Honorable Jay R. Adleman , Judge REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL Arizona Attorney General’s Office , Phoenix By Desiree Michelle Kerfoot Counsel for Respondent
Brian John Pardo , Kingman Petitioner FILED 11-22-2022STATE v. PARDO Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Jennifer M. Perkins, Judge James B. Morse Jr. , and Judge Michael J. Brown delivered the decision of the Court

.

PER CURIAM , ¶1 Petitioner Brian John Pardo seeks review of the superior court's order dismissing his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner's first petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or err or of law, this court will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court's order denying the petit ion for post

- conviction, response, and reply. Petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review but deny relief.
Specialty 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.

Crops Room 1536-S, STOP 0240

Program Washington, DC 20250-0240

June 15, 2018 

 

 AMENDMENT NO. 1

 COMMODITY SPECIFICATION

 FRESH VEGETABLES – October 2014

The purpose of this amendment is to make the following additions in the Commodity 

Specification:

• To add the variety Red to the Potatoes specification for 10/5 pound bags only

Additions are shown in blue.

II. Individual Commodity Specifications

D. Potatoes

5. Types of Varieties –

• 50 pounds cartons –Russet, Baking

• 10/5 pounds bags – Irish, Round, White, Russet, or Red

(As specified in the Solicitation/IFB) 

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8719]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; NHLBI Loan Repayment Grant Review.
    Date: May 4, 2012.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Chang Sook Kim, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7179, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7924, 301-435-0287, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#630002110c0f080c230e020a0f4d0d0a0b4d040c15"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="224143504d4e494d624f434b4e0c4c4b4a0c454d54">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)


    Dated: April 4, 2012.
Anna P. Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-8719 Filed 4-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

# AGENCY:

Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce (DOC).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice announces the selection of the authors for the report of the next National Climate Assessment by the National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory Committee (NCADAC). The next National Climate Assessment will consist of 28 chapters, each drafted by a set of Convening Lead Authors and Lead Authors. The list of these by chapter can be found on the Web page                         *http://www.globalchange.gov/​what-we-do/​assessment/​people/​nca-author-teams.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Dr. Cynthia Decker, Designated Federal Official, National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory Committee, NOAA OAR, R/SAB, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910. (Phone: 301-734-1156, Fax: 301-713-1459, Email:                         *Cynthia.Decker@noaa.gov;*                         or visit the NCADAC Web site at                         *http://www.nesdis.noaa.gov/​NCADAC/​index.html.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory Committee was established in December 2010. The committee's mission is to synthesize and summarize the science and information pertaining to current and future impacts of climate change upon the United States; and to provide advice and recommendations toward the development of an ongoing, sustainable national assessment of global change impacts and adaptation and mitigation strategies for the Nation. Within the scope of its mission, the committee's specific objective is to produce a National Climate Assessment.

Terry Bevels,

Acting Chief Financial Officer/Chief Administrative Officer, Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

[FR Doc. 2012-8382 Filed 4-5-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-KD-P
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 98

Expressing the sense of the Congress in support of National Children’s

Memorial Flag Day.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Ms. BERKLEY (for herself, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. STARK, Mr. ACKERMAN,

Mr. HINCHEY, Ms. CARSON of Indiana, and Mr. HINOJOSA) submitted

the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on Education and the Workforce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress in support of National

Children’s Memorial Flag Day.

Whereas among the world’s 26 richest nations, the United

States accounted for 73 percent of child homicide victims;

Whereas 10 children a day die as a result of firearm use in

the United States;

Whereas at least 3 children a day die from physical abuse or

chronic neglect in the United States;

Whereas April has been designated as National Child Abuse

Prevention Month, an annual tradition started by President Jimmy Carter in 1979; and

Whereas the fourth Friday of each April is National Children’s Memorial Flag Day, when many State and local
2

•HCON 98 IH

governmental agencies and private organizations fly the

Children’s Memorial Flag to remember children lost to violence and to heighten public awareness of the need for

communities to help vulnerable children and families:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) supports National Children’s Memorial Flag

4 Day; and

5 (2) encourages national, State, and local agen6 cies and private organizations to fly the Children’s

7 Memorial Flag—

8 (A) to remember children lost to violence;

9 and

10 (B) to raise public awareness about the

11 continuing problem of violence against children.

Æ