alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6853

ROBERT DARNELL ROBERTS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

SOLOMON HEJIRIKA, Sr.; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF 

MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District 

Judge. (8:11-cv-00868-AW)

Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 27, 2013

Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, OFFICE OF 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Darnell Roberts seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition and has filed motions for appointment of counsel. The 

district court’s order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Roberts has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny Roberts’ motions for appointment of counsel, deny a 

certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Rand Logistics, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on February 11, 2009 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      February 11, 2009
            
            /s/ Laurence
      S. LevyLaurence
      S. LevyChairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6881

CHARLES WILKERSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-97-1468-3-17BC)

Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 29, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Wilkerson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Wilkerson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. Wilkerson v. South Carolina, No. CA-97-1468-3-

17BC (D.S.C. May 27, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1681
KENNETH JORDAN EZELL, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; JO ANNE B. BARNHART, as an individual; JAMES F. STRUES, as an individual; RONALD C. DICKINSON, as an individual; ROBERT S. CARR, as an individual, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-05-1084-2-PMD) Submitted: September 27, 2005 Decided: September 29, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Jordan Ezell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Kenneth Jordan Ezell, Jr., appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Ezell v. Social Sec. Admin. , No. CA-05-1084-2-PMD (D.S.C. May 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Bollore ́ S. A.

Comune d Ergue Gaberic  Odet  29500 (France)

RCS Quimper 304 827 900



North Atlantic Operating Company Inc.257 Park Avenue SouthNew York  NY 10010U. S. A.April 20, 2006


Gentleman:

Reference is made to the Amended and Restated Distribution and License Agreement dated as of November 30, 1992 between us relating to the distribution of Zig-Zag cigarette paper booklets in the United States (the
US Agreement) and Canada (the Canadian Agreement) each as amended by a Restated Amendment dated June 25, 1997 and Amendments dated respectively October 22, 1997 - October 7, 1999  October 20, 1999,
June 19, 2002 and February 28, 2005 (collectively the Agreements).

This will confirm our agreement to amend the Agreements as of the
date hereof as follows:



| | 1. | The definition of original stockholder in Section 11(a) of the US Agreement and Section 10 (a) of the Canadian Agreement shall be amended so as to read:
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Original stockholder shall mean each of the persons listed on Exhibit A hereto and officers and employees of
the Distributor and its Affiliates.



| | 2. | Except as set forth in this Amendment the terms and provisions of the US Agreement and Canadian Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Each of the parties represents and warrants to the other that this Amendment has been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action and that any consent required by either party
in connection with this Amendment have been obtained by such party.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please sign in this space below to indicate your agreement with
foregoing.

Very truly yours,



/s/ Cedric Bollore ́.Bollore ́ S.A.


Agreed to accepted by:



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/ Douglas P. Rosefsky               
|North Atlantic Operating Company, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 324 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 324

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Commending President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan for his leadership 
         and friendship and welcoming him to the United States.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 324

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan has showncourageous leadership in 
        cooperating with the United States in the fight against terrorism;
Whereas President Musharraf has shown great fortitude in confronting extremists 
        and outlawing terrorism in Pakistan;
Whereas the efforts of President Musharraf in fighting terrorism are both in the 
        national interest of Pakistan and of great importance to Pakistani-
        American relations;
Whereas the war against terrorism underscores the importance of strengthening 
        the historic bilateral relationship between the United States and 
        Pakistan;
Whereas President Musharraf has worked to improve the political representation 
        of minorities in Pakistan; and
Whereas the Pakistani-American community in the United States makes important 
        contributions to the United States and plays a vital role in developing 
        a closer relationship between the peoples of the United States and 
        Pakistan: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress commends President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan for his 
leadership and friendship and welcomes him to the United States.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 12, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 235

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the establishment of a National

Day of Remembrance.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 21, 2001

Mr. CLAY (for himself, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia, and Mr.

OWENS) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the

establishment of a National Day of Remembrance.

Whereas on September 11, 2001, beginning at 8:45 a.m.,

eastern daylight time, evil acts of terrorism were perpetrated against the people of the United States and all

humanity;

Whereas thousands of people lost their lives or were injured

as a result of the terrorist attacks of September 11,

2001;

Whereas hundreds of firefighters, police officers, and rescue

workers gave their lives in a heroic effort to save the lives

of victims of these horrific terrorist attacks;

Whereas neither the Government nor the people of the United

States will be deterred by acts of terrorism;
2

•HCON 235 IH

Whereas the Government and people of the United States are

united in the effort to stand firm against any future acts

of terrorism; and

Whereas the establishment of September 11 as a National

Day of Remembrance would provide an opportunity to remember the victims who lost their lives and those who

lost their loved ones as a result of these vicious terrorist

attacks, and to honor the people of the United States

who displayed heroism and courage during and after the

attacks: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) a National Day of Remembrance should be

4 established to remember the victims who lost their

5 lives as a result of the terrorist attacks of September

6 11, 2001, and to honor the people of the United

7 States who displayed heroism and courage during

8 and after the attacks; and

9 (2) the President should issue a proclamation—

10 (A) calling on the people of the United

11 States to observe such a day with appropriate

12 programs and activities; and

13 (B) encouraging houses of worship and

14 other institutions to ring bells and municipali15 ties and other local governmental entities to ac16 tivate emergency alarms and sirens at a speci17 fied time, and people to subsequently observe a
3

•HCON 235 IH

1 moment of silence in recognition of those who

2 died as a result of the attacks.

Æ
Aircraft Log

Date Time Location PIC VO Flight Duration
Weather Takoff/Landing Incident Observations
July 1, 2015

Mr. Peter Nugent

Dronez Aerial

9 Leslie Avenue

Lanesborough, MA 01237

Dear Mr. Nugent:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

part 21 and §§ 45.23(b), 61.3, 61.195, 91.7(a), 91.9 (b)(2), 91.103(b), 91.109, 91.113, 91.119, 

91.121, 91.151(a), 91.203(a) and (b), 91.205(b), 91.215, 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), and 

91.409(a)(2) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your April 17, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Dronez Aerial into the public 

docket (No. FAA−2015−1214), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst, Aircraft and 

 Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 203 (Friday, October 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64373-64374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25839]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8063]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The Dead Sea Scrolls: Life and Faith in Ancient 
Times,'' Formerly Titled ``The Dead Sea Scrolls: Life and Faith in 
Biblical Times.''

ACTION: Notice, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 12, 2011, notice was published on page 63341 of the 
Federal Register (volume 76, number 197) of determinations made by the 
Department of State pertaining to the exhibition ``The Dead Sea 
Scrolls: Life and Faith in Biblical Times.'' The referenced notice is 
corrected here to change the exhibition name to ``The Dead Sea Scrolls: 
Life and Faith in Ancient Times'' and to include additional objects as 
part of the exhibition. Notice is hereby given of the following 
determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of 
October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 
of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and

[[Page 64374]]

Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 
note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, 
Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as 
appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I 
hereby determine that the additional objects to be included in the 
exhibition ``The Dead Sea Scrolls: Life and Faith in Ancient Times,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The additional objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owner or custodian. I also 
determine that the exhibition or display of the additional exhibit 
objects at the Cincinnati Museum Center, Cincinnati, OH, from on or 
about November 16, 2012, until on or about April 13, 2013, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the additional exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, 
Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: October 15, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-25839 Filed 10-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
**
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the**

**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connectionwith the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Screaming Eagle Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), I, Ryan O’Connor, Vice President of Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 
1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

 
2.
To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report. 

Date: March 28, 2022 

 
By: 
/s/ Ryan O’Connor
Name: Ryan O’ConnorTitle: Vice President of Finance **
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer ofNew Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2021(as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNHEquipment Trust 2021-B, does hereby certify that:

 

1.            NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.            The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate tothe Indenture Trustee.

 

3.            This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.            A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2022 and of its performanceunder the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreementin all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2022.

 

6.            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 30th day of March, 2023.

 

 

 

 

March 30, 2023
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Thomas Kirchner, certify that: 

  1) I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-QSB/A of INverso Corp.;  

  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;  

  3) Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;  

  4) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  

  a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based upon such evaluation; and  

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and  

  5) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):  

  a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information and 

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: February 14, 2006

By:   /s/   Thomas Kirchner 

    Thomas Kirchner

    Chief Executive Officer