alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON , D
.C 20460 

# JUL 5 - 2011

CiF FI CE O F i,IR A D qADIATlm l

Mr. Juan Ramirez Chair, FCG Air Subcommittee Florida Electric Power Coordinating Group , Incorporated 1408 North Westshore Boulevard, Suite 1002 Tampa, Florida 33607-4512 Dear Mr. Ramirez: Thank you for your letter ofMay 18 , 2011, requesting an extension of the public comment period for the proposed "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) from Coal-and Oilfired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and Standards ofPerfonnance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired Electric Utility , Industrial-Commercial-Institutional, and Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units" (the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards rule), which was published in the Federal Register on May 3, 2011
. The proposal identified a public comment period of 60 days; that period would have ended on July 5,2011. The U
.S. Environmental Protection Agency , however, recently announced an extension ofthe comment period by 30 days to August 4
. While we are extending the comment period, we are not seeking to extend the November 16, 2011, deadline for signature ofthe final rule, and remain committed to meeting that deadline. The 30-day extension will provide the public with a 140-day period to review the proposal. As you know, interested parties were aware ofthe posting on March 16, 2011, ofthe signed proposal on the EPA's website (http://www.epa.gov/ttnJatw/utility/utilitypg.html)
. along with much ofthe pertinent supporting documentation (including the analyses used in establishing the proposed emission limits and the technical support documents). The proposal was published a little over six weeks later, on May 3, marking the beginning of the fonnal public comment period. This will provide the public with approximately 140 days to review and provide written comments on the proposed rule and supporting documents
. It will also provide at least 60 days for other documentation that was not posted on the website until after the proposed rule was signed. Due to the substantive issues specific to this rulemaking, this comment period is significantly longer than statutorily required.

Internet Address (URL) • http IIwww epa gOY Recycled/Recyclable' Pnn ed Wlt h Vegetable 011 Based Inks on 100% Poslconsumer . Process CI,l onne Flee Recy cled Pape rAgain, thank you for your letter. We look forward to the timely receipt ofyour comments. Sincerely,
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 22, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-30336

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BRANDON J. SMITH,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CR-50076-ALL

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Brandon J. Smith pleaded guilty to an indictment charging

him for being a felon in possession of a firearm and was

sentenced to a 41-month term of imprisonment and to a three-year

period of supervised release. The district court overruled

Smith’s objection to the probation officer’s recommendation that

an adjustment in offense level for acceptance of responsibility

be denied because Smith had denied falsely the offense conduct. 

To obtain a two-level reduction for acceptance of

responsibility, a defendant must clearly demonstrate acceptance
No. 03-30336

-2-

of responsibility for his offense. U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(a); United

States v. Lghodaro, 967 F.2d 1028, 1031 (5th Cir. 1992). The

defendant must truthfully admit the conduct comprising the

offense of conviction. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1., comment. (n.1(a)). 

This court reviews a district court’s finding on acceptance of

responsibility “under a standard of review even more deferential

than a pure clearly erroneous standard.” United States v.

Gonzales, 19 F.3d 982, 983 (5th Cir. 1994) (internal citation and

quotation omitted). 

Smith argues that he admitted his involvement in the offense

at the change-of-plea hearing and at the sentencing hearing and

that the district court gave too much weight to Smith’s false

statements during his interview with the probation officer. 

Smith contends that he was merely exercising his constitutional

right against self-incrimination and that he should not be

punished because he believed naively that he could still proceed

to trial after pleading guilty. 

The adjustment for acceptance of responsibility is in the

nature of a reward, not a punishment, and does not unduly burden

constitutional privileges. See United States v. Mourning, 914

F.2d 699, 707 (5th Cir. 1990). The district court did not

clearly err in giving weight to the false statements made by

Smith to the probation officer. Under the deferential standard

applicable to the district court’s ruling, there is no basis for

reversal. The judgment is AFFIRMED.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D2023-3108 

LT Case No. 2020-CF-5213-A 

_____________________________

ANJUAN EVERETT, 

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County. 

Peter M. Brigham, Judge. 

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Ali L. Hansen, Assistant 

Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Roberts J. 

Bradford, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee.

August 20, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

EDWARDS, C.J., and WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur. 
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
Order 2011
- 6
- 28 Served: June 28, 2011 

### UNITED STA

TES OF A MERICA DEPA RTMENT OF TRA NSPORTA TION OFFICE OF THE SECRETA RY WASHINGTON, D.C. Is sued by the Department of Transportation on the 28 th day

of June , 2011 Essential air service at RHINELANDER, WI SCONSIN under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq. Docket DOT - OST - 2011 - 0109

ORDER AL LOWING SUSPENSION OF SERVICE Summary By this order, the Department is allowing Mesaba Aviation, Inc., operating as Delta Connection (Mesaba) to suspend its scheduled air se rvice at Rhinelander , Wisconsin , as of September 5, 2011
. Background Rhinelander is an essential air service (EAS) community by virtue of its being listed on a certificated carrier’s certificate on October 24, 1978, the date of enactment of the Airline De regulation Act. Mesaba currently provides nonsubsidized air service at Rhinelander with 13 nonstop round trips a week to Minneapolis using 34
- seat Saab 340 aircraft. Inaddition, Rhinelander receives nonsubsidized scheduled air service from Chautauqua Ai rlines, operating as Frontier Express ( Chautauqua) , with 13 nonstop round trips a week over a Milwaukee
Rhinelander
- Ironwood routing using 37
- seat Embraer 135 aircraft. On June 7, 2011, Mesaba filed a 90
- day

notice of its intent to suspend its service at Rhinelander. I f Rhinelander were not an EAS community , Mesaba could have simply suspended service without filing any notice. Decision W e will allow Mesaba to discontinue its service at Rhinelander , as of September 5, 2011 , as it requested
. Chautauqua ’s remaining service of two round trips a day to Milwaukee with 37
- seat regional jets meets the community ’s essential air service determination, which calls for two round trips a day

offering 67 seats in each direction
. Thus, we have no authority to require Mesaba to continue beyond the end of the 90
- day notice period.- 2
-

Before Mesaba suspends its service s , we expect it to contact all travelers holding reservations for travel after its suspension date ; to notify them of its suspension and the alternative service s available from other carriers ; and to assist them in arranging alternate transportation or to provide them with a refund of their ticket price, without penalty, if requested. This order is issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.56a(f). AC COR DINGLY, 1
. We allow Mesaba Aviation , In c. , operating as Delta Connection to suspend its scheduled air service at Rhinelander , Wisconsin , as of September 5, 2011 ; 2. This docket will remain open until further order of the Department; and 3 . We will ser

ve copies of this order on the mayor and airport manager of Rhinelander, Mesaba Aviation, Inc. and Chautauqua Airlines, operating as Frontier Express
. By :

SUSA N L. KURLA ND Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs (SEAL) An e lectronic version of this document is available at www.regulations.gov
----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**Certification      of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| 1. | The                quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Grande Communications Holdings,                Inc. for                the three months ending June 30, 2007 filed on the date hereof with                the                Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act                of 1934; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Grande                Communications Holdings, Inc. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                August 14, 2007 |   | /s/    Roy                H. Chestnutt         |
|--------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |   | **Roy                H. Chestnutt**                                                                        |
|                                 |   | **President                and Chief Executive                Officer**                                    |

| Date:                August 14, 2007 |   | /s/    Michael                L. Wilfley         |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |   | **Michael                L. Wilfley**                                                                        |
|                                 |   | **Chief                Financial Officer**                                                                   |

----
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 22, 2024

NO. 03

- 23

- 00060

- CR

Dillan Marion McCullers , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY
BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND SMITH MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the tr i a l court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court ho lds that there was no error in the court’s

judgment of conviction requiring reversal

. However, there was error in the judgment of

conviction that requires correction. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment of

conviction to reflect that the “Statute for Offense” was “22.011(a)(1)(A) TEXAS PENAL

CODE.” The judgment of conviction , as modified , is affirmed

. Because appellant is indigent

and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-40673

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Rubicel Cardenas-Mendoza, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:14-CR-504-5

Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Rubicel Cardenas-Mendoza has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Cardenas-Mendoza has not filed a response. We have 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 18, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-40673 Document: 00516438648 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2022
No. 21-40673

2

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for 

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. 

R. 42.2.

Case: 21-40673 Document: 00516438648 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2022
[No. 18100-2-II.

Division Two.

July 12, 1996.]

#### *In the Matter of the Estate of*Ruth W. Sherwood. Estate of Ruth W. Sherwood, *Respondent,*v. Maria E. Ganyon, *in her individual capacity and as her separate estate, Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 93-2-07733-1, Vicki L. Hogan, J., entered *1033March 10, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, A.C.J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Turner, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 294 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 294

  Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Secretary of the Navy 
       should name a new naval vessel the ``U.S.S. Bluejacket''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2001

 Mr. Simmons submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Secretary of the Navy 
       should name a new naval vessel the ``U.S.S. Bluejacket''.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the Secretary of the Navy 
should name an appropriate new naval vessel the ``U.S.S. Bluejacket'' 
in honor of the millions of enlisted men and women who have proudly 
served as sailors in the United States Navy.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT** **32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Calpine Generating Company, LLC and CalGen Finance Corp. on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge, based upon a review of the Report:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

 

| */s/*  *Scott J. Davido*** |   | */s/*  *Charles B. Clark, Jr.* |
|--------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
| Scott J. Davido                      |   | Charles B. Clark, Jr.                    |
| *President and Corporate Secretary*  |   | *Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer*  |

 

 

Dated: January 30, 2007

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Calpine Generating Company, LLC and will be retained by Calpine Generating Company, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EPA Registration Jacket 66330-255

Vol. 4
Aircraft Log

Date Time Location PIC VO Flight DurationWeather Takoff/Landing Incident Observations
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of JER Investors
Trust Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), J. Michael McGillis, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 10, 2009



/s/ J. Michael McGillisName:

J. Michael McGillisTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
Transportation and Marketing

Description of Funded Projects

Sheep Production and Marketing 

Grant Program

Fiscal Year 2019

Amount of Funds Awarded: $1,901,486.72

Number of Grants Awarded: 1

For more information, please visit the grant program's website:

NOTE: The below project descriptions were provided by the grant recipients.

www.ams.usda.gov/spmgp

Maine

Recipient: National Sheep Industry Improvement Center Award Amount: $1,901,486.72

Thomaston, ME

NSIIC Competitive Grant Initiative for Production and Marketing Enhancement and Long-Term Infrastructure Improvement

The National Sheep Industry Improvement Center (NSIIC) plans to fund subgrants that will strengthen and enhance the 

production and marketing of sheep and sheep products in the United States including infrastructure, business, resource 

development and the development of innovative approaches to solve long term needs. Over a five-year period, funds will be 

awarded to projects that meet the priorities established by the industry to assist its long-term needs. Each year the NSIIC will 

seek most pressing industry needs from major segments of the industry as well as individuals to prioritize those needs. 

Priorities are reviewed annually to be sure that needs are being met as they arise. At present the primary needs are 

increasing numbers of producers and increasing the size of the flock along with research in health and disease. A yearly call 

for proposals will be published in early summer. Proposals will be reviewed and recommended by the Sheep Center Board of 

Directors. All subgrants established under this competitive process are then monitored by the program manager to assure 

that project goals are being met and that activities are on target as outlined in their proposals.

Project Type: Grant
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0471 

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

STEVEN LEE STRIKE, SR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

 ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw as 

counsel of record pursuant to Mont. Code Ann. § 46-8-103(2) and Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and good cause appearing therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Appellant in this matter shall 

file a response to this motion within thirty (30) days of the date of this 

Order. The response must be served upon all counsel of record, 

including the Attorney General, the County Attorney, and the Appellate 

Defender’s Office. 

05/23/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0471
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give 

notice of this Order by mail to all counsel of record and to the Appellant 

at his last known address.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 23 2022
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 564 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that President Donald Trump should 

hold the Government of the Russian Federation accountable for its interference in the 2016 United States election and ensure that the United 

States is prepared to counter future attempts at election interference. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 28, 2018 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself and Mr. COONS) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Senate that President Donald 

Trump should hold the Government of the Russian Federation accountable for its interference in the 2016 

United States election and ensure that the United States 

is prepared to counter future attempts at election interference. 

Whereas it is the unanimous opinion of the United States intelligence community under both the Administration of 

President Barack Obama and the Administration of 

President Donald Trump that the Government of the 

Russian Federation interfered in the 2016 United States 

election; and 

Whereas it is the unanimous opinion of the intelligence community that the Government of the Russian Federation 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 564 IS 

will interfere in the 2018 United States election and in 

future elections of the United States: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that 

2 President Donald Trump— 

3 (1) should use every opportunity and every tool 

4 at his disposal, including the upcoming summit with 

5 the President of the Russian Federation Vladimir 

6 Putin, to hold the Government of the Russian Fed7 eration accountable for its attempts to undermine 

8 democracy in the United States and abroad; 

9 (2) should ensure that the United States Gov10 ernment is prepared to counter future attempts to 

11 interfere in United States elections; and 

12 (3) must clarify to President Putin that if the 

13 Government of the Russian Federation continues to 

14 interfere with democracy in the United States, it 

15 does so at its own peril. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
U. S. Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF COTTON

FOR RELEASE AT 12:00 P.M. CT September 11, 2020

USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of Cotton. The cotton bales were sold under 

Invitation 2020U0050 dated September 10, 2020.

Invitation 2020U0050

Catalog 

Lot No. Catalog Location Purchaser Pounds Sold Bales Sold

Price 

Sold 

(per 

Pound)

CCC 

Revenue 

1 CORPUS 

CHRISTI, TX Farmcot Inc. 5,933 12 0.13 $771.29

5,933 12 $771.29