alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### MEMORANDUM

**Tetra Tech, Inc. 10306 Eaton Place, Suite 340**  **Fairfax, VA 22030 phone**  **703 -**  **385 -**  **6000 fax**  **703 -**  **385 -**  **6007** DATE: March 2, 2012 TO : Paul Shriner, EPA FROM : Blaine Sn yder , Tetra Tech SUBJECT: Summary

of American Fisheries Society (AFS) 2011 Sy

mposium In support of the 316(b) rulemaking, Tetra Tech attended the American Fisheries Society ’s (AFS) annual meeting in Seattle, Washington on September 5 th and 6 th , 2011. The sy mposium was sponsored by the AFS Bioengineering Section. The Monday se ssion started at 1:15 PM with an introduction and presentation b y Doug Dixon (EPRI ) on the draft 316(b) rule for existing facilities. The first session ended at 5:15 PM, and the sy mposium resumed at 8:00 AM on Tuesday and continued until 3:00 PM. There w ere a total of 37 platform presentations. Although it is somewhat difficult to categorize all presentations, the majority focused on intake technologies, impingement/entrainment survey s, source water survey s, and economic benefits. Most speakers were rep resenting engineering/consulting firms or utilities. Attached to this memo is a summary of the s ymposium, including abstracts from each presentation. One presentation was of particular interest to EPA; it was titled “Abundance and Composition of Fish and Shellfish I mpinged and Entrained at Power Plant Intakes Based on a Survey

of Over 220 Power Plants” and was presented b y Greg Seegert of EA Engineering. EPA followed up with Mr. Seegert and the sponsor of the research, Doug Dixon of EPRI . The EPRIdocum ent upon which the presentation is based is also attached, as well as an additional analy sis provided by EPRI.
Order entered June 25, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00395-CV

CHRISTIN BISHOP, Appellant

V.

CREDITPLEX AUTO SALES L.L.C. D/B/A GREENVILLE MITSUBISHI; 

SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-01838-D

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s June 23, 2015 unopposed motion for second extension of time 

to file brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than July 3, 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Lafayette Square Far West BDC, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”), I, Damien Dwin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 25, 2022By:/s/ Damien DwinDamien DwinPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Williams, Appellant.

(No. 31533

Decided October 20, 1948.)

*Mrs. Mary F. Abel,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Meade C. Robinson,*for appellee.

*Mr. F. W. Durbin*and *Mr. E. 8.'Navarre,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Hart, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.

Zimmerman, J., not. participating.
TO: Federal Aviation Administration FDMS No. FAA-2012-0205 600 Independence Avenue, S. W. Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 Washington, D.C. 20591 ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430

FROM: Addison Jet Management, Inc. 7515 Lemmon Ave. Dallas, Texas 75209 Thursday, August 23, 2012 Dear Sirs; 

# RECEIVED AUG 2 72012 

# HEARING DOCKET

Inresponse to Order To Respondent To Show Cause, Addison Jet Management, Inc. agrees that it committed the violations withwhich it is charged and askthat our request for a hearing be withdrawn. We askthat the Office ofthe ChiefCounsel for the FAAreconsider the amount ofthe fine imposed. We askthis based on the results ofthe last inspection conductedby the Federal Aviation Administration, Drug Abatement Division, that was held at our facility earlierthis year. The audit emphasized the areas where we had trouble in the past. The audit found no discrepancies at all. We ask thatthis be taken into consideration as well as the fact that the pilot that conducted the flight in this violation was currently on our Drug Abatement Program with no negative results and had no negative test results from the other operator that she was flying for. Upondiscovering that we had not sentthat operator the "J" form asking about any testresults, we immediately sentthe paperwork to them and received the form stating thatthere were no negative results. Addison Jet Management, Inc. ask respectfully for any consideration the FAAmay offer. We will comply with the orders ofthe Attorney, Enforcement Division, Office ofthe ChiefCounsel, Federal Aviation Administration.

# ~JJ/ 

# J)2r/ Gerald P. Shaw Director ofOperations Addison Jet Management, Inc. 214-366-4800

cc: Autunm Killingham, Attorney, Enforcement Division, The Honorable Richard C.Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1032 KA 12-01263 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

FREDERICK WEAVER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

CARR SAGLIMBEN LLP, OLEAN (JAY D. CARR OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LORI PETTIT RIEMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LITTLE VALLEY, FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Cattaraugus County Court (M. William Boller, A.J.), rendered April 23, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the fourth degree. Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by defendant on July 28, 2013 and by the attorneys for the parties on July 30 and August 28, 2013,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed upon stipulation.

Entered: November 8, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
III

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 413

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 16, 2002

Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring the invention of modern air-conditioning by Dr.

Willis H. Carrier on the occasion of its 100th anniversary.

Whereas on July 17, 1902, Dr. Willis H. Carrier submitted

designs to a printing plant in Brooklyn, New York, for

equipment to control temperature, humidity, ventilation,

and air quality, marking the birth of modern air conditioning;

Whereas air-conditioning has become an integral technology

enabling the advancement of society through
2

HCON 413 RFS

improvements to the Nation’s health and well-being,

manufacturing processes, building capacities, research,

medical capabilities, food preservation, art and historical

conservation, and general productivity and indoor comfort;

Whereas Dr. Carrier debuted air-conditioning technology for

legislative activity in the House of Representatives Chamber in 1928, and the Senate Chamber in 1929;

Whereas the air-conditioning industry now totals $36 billion

on a global basis and employs more than 700,000 people

in the United States; and

Whereas the year 2002 marks the 100th anniversary of modern air-conditioning: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress honors the invention of

3 modern air-conditioning by Dr. Willis H. Carrier on the

4 occasion of its 100th anniversary.

Passed the House of Representatives July 15, 2002.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer ofGFI Group Inc.**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asAdopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of GFI Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James A. Peers, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to the 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to my knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  May 16, 2005

 
| /s/ James A.  Peers                      |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
| James A.  Peers  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
State of California 

California Environmental Protection Agency 

AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

Supplement to the 

Final Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking 

Large Spark-Ignition Engines with an Engine Displacement 

Less Than or Equal to One Liter 

Public Hearing Date: November 21, 2008 

Agenda Item No.: 08-10-4 

 

The ARB is submitting this supplement to the Final Statement of Reasons for insertion 

in Office of Administrative Law (OAL) File Number 2009-0908-04S. 

Nonsubstantial Changes Made to the Final Regulation Order 

ARB has made some minor nonsubstantial changes to the final regulation order for 

punctuation, grammar, accuracy, clarity, and proper authority and reference citations. 

The changes made do not materially alter any requirement, right responsibility, 

condition, prescription, or other regulatory element of any California Code of 

Regulations (CCR) provisions. They are as follows:

Section 2433(b)(5): Corrected the wording from “definitions” to “definition.” 

Section 2433 (c): Corrected the date of amendment for the “California Exhaust and 

Evaporative Emission Standards and Test Procedures for New 2010 and Later OffRoad Large Spark-ignition Engines (2010 and Later Test Procedure 1048)” added after 

March 2, 2007 “, as last amended November 21, 2008.” 

Section 2433 (d) (2): The titles given in the regulation for the incorporated test 

procedures TP-901, TP-902, and CP-901 have been corrected so that the referenced 

titles correspond with the titles on the test procedures themselves. 

California Exhaust and Evaporative Emission Standards and Test Procedures for New 

2010 And Later Off-Road Large Spark-Ignition Engines: Added a series of five asterisks 

to indicate that there are no further changes to the document. 

Summary and Response 

10. Comment: ROHVA supports functional harmonization between U.S. EPA and 

ARB vehicle classification systems. ROHVA is concerned by the fact that some 

OHRVs covered under U.S. EPA’s recreational vehicle emission regulations 

could be subject to ARB’s LSI engine regulations. (ROHVA) 
2

Comment: The most appropriate approach is that LSI engines ≤ 1.0 L used in 

OHRV-like applications would be immediately subject to the OHRV exhaust and 

evaporative emission limits. (Polaris) 

Agency Response: The exhaust and evaporative emission standards for LSI engines 

used in vehicles similar to off-highway recreational vehicles are explained in the staff 

report (see section 3.3). Furthermore, the technological feasibility of these standards is 

discussed in the Agency Response to Comment No. 1. The comments specifically 

regarding off-highway recreational vehicle classification and regulations, which were 

raised by Polaris and ROHVA, are outside the scope of the amendments proposed in 

the rulemaking. Accordingly, ARB will not respond to these comments and testimony 

because they are not relevant to the proposed amendments.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of JER Investors
Trust Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Tae-Sik Yoon, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                       
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Tae-Sik Yoon                                                      
|                     |  |  |  | Name: Tae-Sik Yoon                                                    
|                     |  |  |  | Title: Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 483 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.483
                                    Agreed to September 26, 2002        

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
          the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 1646) to authorize 
appropriations for the Department of State for fiscal year 2003, to 
authorize appropriations under the Arms Export Control Act and the 
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 for security assistance for fiscal year 
2003, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of Representatives 
shall insert at the appropriate place the following new section (and 
conform the table of contents accordingly):

SEC. 1309. THREE-YEAR INTERNATIONAL ARMS CONTROL AND NONPROLIFERATION 
              STRATEGY.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of State shall prepare and submit to the appropriate 
congressional committees a 3-year international arms control and 
nonproliferation strategy. The strategy shall contain the following:
        (1) A 3-year plan for the reduction of existing nuclear, 
    chemical, and biological weapons and ballistic missiles and for 
    controlling the proliferation of these weapons.
        (2) Identification of the goals and objectives of the United 
    States with respect to arms control and nonproliferation of weapons 
    of mass destruction and their delivery systems.
        (3) A description of the programs, projects, and activities of 
    the Department of State intended to accomplish goals and objectives 
    described in paragraph (2).
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Bureau of Labor Statistics

      ( print page 20850)    
The Bureau of Labor Statistics Data Users Advisory Committee will meet on Thursday May 17, 2012. The meeting will be held in the Postal Square Building, 2 Massachusetts Avenue NE.; Washington, DC.

The Committee provides advice to the Bureau of Labor Statistics from the points of view of data users from various sectors of the U.S. economy, including the labor, business, research, academic, and government communities, on technical matters related to the collection, analysis, dissemination, and use of the Bureau's statistics, on its published reports, and on the broader aspects of its overall mission and function.

The meeting will be held in Meeting Rooms 1, 2, and 3 of the Postal Square Building Conference Center. The schedule and agenda for the meeting are as follows:

8:30 a.m. Registration.

8:45 a.m. Introductions, welcome, and brief review of agency developments.

9 a.m. Federal Advisory Committee Membership.

9:15 a.m. Employment Measures by Age of Firm.

10:15 a.m. Treatment of Contractors in BLS Data.

1 p.m. Prospectus on New Benefit Cost Measures.

                    2 p.m. Reinventing the                     *Monthly Labor Review.*

3:15 p.m. Brainstorming Session—suggestions for data or program improvements.

3:45 p.m. Meeting wrap-up.

4 p.m. The Shifting Composition of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses (extra/optional topic for interested members).

The meeting is open to the public. Any questions concerning the meeting should be directed to Kathy Mele, Data Users Advisory Committee, on 202-691-6102. Individuals who require special accommodations should contact Ms. Mele at least two days prior to the meeting date.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of April 2012.

Kimberley D. Hill,

Chief, Division of Management Systems, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

[FR Doc. 2012-8320 Filed 4-5-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-24-P
-78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0

 38.5

 39.0

 39.5

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/16

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 16 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
#### Bobbie J. WARREN, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Stewart HUNTER, District Judge in and for Oklahoma County, State of Oklahoma, Respondent.

No. 56975.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 28, 1981.

*419Robinson & Bower, Inc., P.C., Jerry V. Beavin, Oklahoma City, for petitioner.

Bill J. Nunn, Oklahoma City, for respondent.

OPALA, Justice:

The 1979 amendment of 12 O.S. 1971 § 12771 provides that:

> « * * *

> Any child shall be entitled to support *by the parents*until the child reaches eighteen (18) years of age. If a dependent child is regularly and continuously attending high school, said child shall be entitled to support *by the parents*through the age of eighteen (18) years.” [Emphasis ours].

The question to be answered is whether the § 1277 obligation *vis-á-vis*one’s dependent child who is attending high school while past the age of eighteen is imposable in a post-decree proceeding prosecuted between the parents in a divorce case, or gives rise to an unrelated claim that is enforceable only in a suit by the support-seeking child. We hold that the § 1277 responsibility is status-based and constitutes a *common burden*of both parents; the parent who — on a day-to-day basis — is providing or will be providing the child, while in high school past the age of majority, with the necessities of life, or who is or will be supplying for that child more than his share of the common obligation, may seek from the court an order against the other parent for continuing contributions in an amount to be judicially determined; and the interparen-tal claim is litigable in the divorce case as a modification-of-decree proceeding.

Legislative authority to impose on a parent a status-based duty of support beyond the child’s age of majority cannot be questioned. There is hence no fundamental infirmity in the § 1277 extension of the district court’s power to make provisions for the support of a divorced parent’s child beyond the point of that person’s adulthood.2

The statute clearly casts liability on both parents. It places them under a *common burden.*One who discharges a common debt or pays more than his share of it has a claim for contribution. Co-obligors are required to contribute, either equally or equitably, toward the discharge of a common obligation.3 In short, § 1277 creates an interparental claim for contribution litiga-ble between the parties as a post-divorce modification proceeding.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals in *Garrett v.*Garrett4 is not to be followed insofar as it is in conflict with our preceden-tial pronouncement in this case.

Original jurisdiction assumed; writ denied.

IRWIN, C. J., BARNES, V.C.J., and WILLIAMS, LAVENDER, SIMMS, DOO-LIN and HARGRAVE, JJ., concur.

1

. Okla.Sess. Laws 1979, c. 93 § 1; 12 O.S.Supp. 1979 § 1277.

2

. *Irby v. Martin,*Okl., 500 P.2d 278, 280 [1972]; *Galloway v. Galloway,*Okl., 600 P.2d 321 [1979],

3

. *Brown v. Goldsmith,*Okl., 437 P.2d 247, 248 [1967]; *Wilson v. Crutcher,*176 Okl. 481, 56 P.2d 416, 417 [1936],

4

. Okl.App., 625 P.2d 1286, 1288 [1981].
EXHIBIT 32



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Roebling  Financial  Corp,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended June 30, 2004 (the
"Report")  as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof, we, Frank J. Travea,  III,  President and Chief Executive  Officer,  and
Janice A. Summers,  Senior Vice  President,  Chief  Operating  Officer and Chief
Financial Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/Frank J. Travea, III                         /s/Janice A. Summers
-------------------------------------           ----------------------
Frank J. Travea, III                            Janice A. Summers
President and Chief Executive Officer           Senior Vice President,
                                                Chief Operating Officer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer




September 27, 2004