III

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 83

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 28, 2001

Received and referred to the Committee on the Budget

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Establishing the congressional budget for the United States

Government for fiscal year 2002, revising the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal

year 2001, and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels

for each of fiscal years 2003 through 2011.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

HCON 83 RFS

1 SECTION 1. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET

2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002.

3 The Congress declares that the concurrent resolution

4 on the budget for fiscal year 2001 is hereby revised and

5 replaced and that this is the concurrent resolution on the

6 budget for fiscal year 2002 and that the appropriate budg7 etary levels for fiscal years 2003 through 2011 are hereby

8 set forth.

9 SEC. 2. RECOMMENDED LEVELS AND AMOUNTS.

10 The following budgetary levels are appropriate for

11 each of fiscal years 2001 through 2011:

12 (1) FEDERAL REVENUES.—For purposes of the

13 enforcement of this resolution:

14 (A) The recommended levels of Federal

15 revenues are as follows:

16 Fiscal year 2001: $1,624,700,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 2002: $1,635,800,000,000.

18 Fiscal year 2003: $1,699,000,000,000.

19 Fiscal year 2004: $1,755,700,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2005: $1,816,700,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2006: $1,872,200,000,000.

22 Fiscal year 2007: $1,948,600,000,000.

23 Fiscal year 2008: $2,041,700,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 2009: $2,143,200,000,000.

25 iscal year 2010: $2,256,600,000,000.

26 Fiscal year 2011: $2,387,000,000,000.
3

HCON 83 RFS

1 (B) The amounts by which the aggregate

2 levels of Federal revenues should be reduced are

3 as follows:

4 Fiscal year 2001: $5,800,000,000.

5 Fiscal year 2002: $67,700,000,000.

6 Fiscal year 2003: $83,100,000,000.

7 Fiscal year 2004: $108,600,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2005: $133,100,000,000.

9 Fiscal year 2006: $167,400,000,000.

10 Fiscal year 2007: $187,100,000,000.

11 Fiscal year 2008: $201,100,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2009: $217,000,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 2010: $232,700,000,000.

14 Fiscal year 2011: $240,900,000,000.

15 (2) NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY.—For purposes

16 of the enforcement of this resolution, the appropriate

17 levels of total new budget authority are as follows:

18 Fiscal year 2001: $1,556,900,000,000.

19 Fiscal year 2002: $1,613,700,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2003: $1,660,300,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2004: $1,723,200,000,000.

22 Fiscal year 2005: $1,799,900,000,000.

23 Fiscal year 2006: $1,851,600,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 2007: $1,918,000,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2008: $1,998,500,000,000.
4

HCON 83 RFS

1 Fiscal year 2009: $2,077,000,000,000.

2 Fiscal year 2010: $2,161,500,000,000.

3 Fiscal year 2011: $2,252,800,000,000.

4 (3) BUDGET OUTLAYS.—For purposes of the

5 enforcement of this resolution, the appropriate levels

6 of total budget outlays are as follows:

7 Fiscal year 2001: $1,508,900,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2002: $1,579,800,000,000.

9 Fiscal year 2003: $1,634,600,000,000.

10 Fiscal year 2004: $1,698,600,000,000.

11 Fiscal year 2005: $1,777,600,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2006: $1,825,700,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 2007: $1,889,900,000,000.

14 Fiscal year 2008: $1,973,700,000,000.

15 Fiscal year 2009: $2,053,600,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2010: $2,139,900,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 2011: $2,230,200,000,000.

18 (4) SURPLUSES.—For purposes of the enforce19 ment of this resolution, the amounts of the surpluses

20 are as follows:

21 Fiscal year 2001: $115,800,000,000.

22 Fiscal year 2002: $56,000,000,000.

23 Fiscal year 2003: $64,400,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 2004: $57,100,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2005: $39,100,000,000.
5

HCON 83 RFS

1 Fiscal year 2006: $46,500,000,000.

2 Fiscal year 2007: $58,700,000,000.

3 Fiscal year 2008: $68,000,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2009: $89,600,000,000.

5 Fiscal year 2010: $116,700,000,000.

6 Fiscal year 2011: $156,800,000,000.

7 (5) PUBLIC DEBT.—The appropriate levels of

8 the public debt are as follows:

9 Fiscal year 2001: $5,575,000,000,000.

10 Fiscal year 2002: $5,623,000,000,000.

11 Fiscal year 2003: $5,674,000,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2004: $5,733,000,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 2005: $5,807,000,000,000.

14 Fiscal year 2006: $5,875,000,000,000.

15 Fiscal year 2007: $5,928,000,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2008: $5,969,000,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 2009: $5,988,000,000,000.

18 Fiscal year 2010: $6,344,000,000,000.

19 Fiscal year 2011: $6,721,000,000,000.

20 SEC. 3. MAJOR FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES.

21 The Congress determines and declares that the ap22 propriate levels of new budget authority and budget out23 lays for fiscal years 2001 through 2011 for each major

24 functional category are:

25 (1) National Defense (050):
6

HCON 83 RFS

1 Fiscal year 2001:

2 (A) New budget authority,

3 $310,300,000,000.

4 (B) Outlays, $300,600,000,000.

5 Fiscal year 2002:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $324,600,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $319,300,000,000.

9 Fiscal year 2003:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 $333,300,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, $325,500,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 2004:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $342,600,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $334,000,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 2005:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $352,200,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, $347,200,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2006:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $362,100,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $354,600,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2007:
7

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $372,200,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $361,900,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2008:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $382,700,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $375,600,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2009:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $393,500,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $386,500,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2010:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $404,500,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $397,600,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2011:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $416,300,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $409,200,000,000.

20 (2) International Affairs (150):

21 Fiscal year 2001:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $22,400,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $19,700,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2002:
8

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $23,900,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $19,600,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2003:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $23,900,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $19,900,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2004:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $24,500,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $20,400,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2005:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $25,400,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $20,800,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2006:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $26,200,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $21,400,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2007:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 $26,900,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, $22,100,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 2008:
9

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $27,400,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $22,800,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2009:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $28,000,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $23,600,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2010:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $28,400,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $24,200,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2011:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $29,600,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $25,000,000,000.

16 (3) General Science, Space, and Technology

17 (250):

18 Fiscal year 2001:

19 (A) New budget authority,

20 $21,000,000,000.

21 (B) Outlays, $19,600,000,000.

22 Fiscal year 2002:

23 (A) New budget authority,

24 $22,200,000,000.

25 (B) Outlays, $21,000,000,000.
10

HCON 83 RFS

1 Fiscal year 2003:

2 (A) New budget authority,

3 $22,600,000,000.

4 (B) Outlays, $21,900,000,000.

5 Fiscal year 2004:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $23,100,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $22,600,000,000.

9 Fiscal year 2005:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 $23,600,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, $23,200,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 2006:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $24,300,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $23,700,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 2007:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $24,900,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, $24,300,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2008:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $25,600,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $24,900,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2009:
11

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $26,200,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $25,600,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2010:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $26,700,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $26,100,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2011:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $27,800,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $26,900,000,000.

12 (4) Energy (270):

13 Fiscal year 2001:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $1,200,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, ¥$100,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 2002:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $800,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, ¥$200,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2003:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $800,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, ¥$500,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2004:
12

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $900,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, ¥$600,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2005:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $900,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, ¥$500,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2006:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $1,000,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, ¥$400,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2007:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $1,100,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, ¥$200,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2008:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $2,200,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $400,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2009:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 $2,300,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, $800,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 2010:
13

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $2,300,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $1,000,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2011:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $2,200,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $900,000,000.

8 (5) Natural Resources and Environment (300):

9 Fiscal year 2001:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 $28,800,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, $26,400,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 2002:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $26,700,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $26,400,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 2003:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $26,800,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, $27,000,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2004:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $27,700,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $27,500,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2005:
14

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $27,900,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $27,700,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2006:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $28,000,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $27,800,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2007:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $28,600,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $28,300,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2008:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $29,300,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $28,800,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2009:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $30,600,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $29,900,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2010:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 $31,200,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, $30,500,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 2011:
15

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $32,400,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $31,500,000,000.

4 (6) Agriculture (350):

5 Fiscal year 2001:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $26,300,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $23,700,000,000.

9 Fiscal year 2002:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 $19,100,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, $17,500,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 2003:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $18,600,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $17,000,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 2004:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $18,500,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, $17,100,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2005:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $18,300,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $16,900,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2006:
16

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $17,900,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $16,300,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2007:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $16,500,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $14,900,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2008:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $15,600,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $14,100,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2009:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $15,800,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $14,400,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2010:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $15,900,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $14,500,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2011:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 $16,100,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, $14,700,000,000.

24 (7) Commerce and Housing Credit (370):

25 Fiscal year 2001:
17

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $2,500,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, ¥$800,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2002:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $7,400,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $4,400,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2003:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $8,600,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $3,200,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2004:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $12,800,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $8,600,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2005:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $12,700,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $9,000,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2006:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 $12,700,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, $8,400,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 2007:
18

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $13,500,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $9,200,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2008:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $13,900,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $9,300,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2009:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $14,300,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $9,600,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2010:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $18,700,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $12,800,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2011:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $13,500,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $9,800,000,000.

20 (8) Transportation (400):

21 Fiscal year 2001:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $62,100,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $51,700,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2002:
19

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $61,000,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $55,600,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2003:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $58,700,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $58,300,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2004:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $59,200,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $60,200,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2005:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $59,700,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $62,000,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2006:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $60,300,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $63,700,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2007:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 $60,800,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, $64,900,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 2008:
20

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $61,300,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $66,400,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2009:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $61,800,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $68,000,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2010:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $62,200,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $69,300,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2011:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $63,100,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $71,200,000,000.

16 (9) Community and Regional Development

17 (450):

18 Fiscal year 2001:

19 (A) New budget authority,

20 $11,200,000,000.

21 (B) Outlays, $11,400,000,000.

22 Fiscal year 2002:

23 (A) New budget authority,

24 $10,100,000,000.

25 (B) Outlays, $11,400,000,000.
21

HCON 83 RFS

1 Fiscal year 2003:

2 (A) New budget authority,

3 $10,300,000,000.

4 (B) Outlays, $11,000,000,000.

5 Fiscal year 2004:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $10,600,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $10,700,000,000.

9 Fiscal year 2005:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 $10,900,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, $10,400,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 2006:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $11,200,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $10,300,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 2007:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $11,500,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, $10,500,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2008:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $11,800,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $10,800,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2009:
22

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $12,100,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $11,000,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2010:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $12,300,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $11,300,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2011:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $12,800,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $11,600,000,000.

12 (10) Education, Training, Employment, and

13 Social Services (500):

14 Fiscal year 2001:

15 (A) New budget authority,

16 $76,900,000,000.

17 (B) Outlays, $69,800,000,000.

18 Fiscal year 2002:

19 (A) New budget authority,

20 $82,100,000,000.

21 (B) Outlays, $76,200,000,000.

22 Fiscal year 2003:

23 (A) New budget authority,

24 $82,000,000,000.

25 (B) Outlays, $81,700,000,000.
23

HCON 83 RFS

1 Fiscal year 2004:

2 (A) New budget authority,

3 $83,900,000,000.

4 (B) Outlays, $82,300,000,000.

5 Fiscal year 2005:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $87,300,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $84,800,000,000.

9 Fiscal year 2006:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 $90,200,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, $87,700,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 2007:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $92,800,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $90,400,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 2008:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $95,700,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, $93,000,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2009:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $98,400,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $95,900,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2010:
24

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $100,500,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $98,400,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2011:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $104,600,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $101,400,000,000.

8 (11) Health (550):

9 Fiscal year 2001:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 $182,600,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, $175,500,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 2002:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $204,000,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $201,100,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 2003:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $229,700,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, $225,800,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2004:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $246,500,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $244,700,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2005:
25

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $253,800,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $251,500,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2006:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $266,800,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $264,600,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2007:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $287,000,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $284,200,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2008:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $307,600,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $305,200,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2009:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $329,700,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $327,600,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2010:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 $354,200,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, $352,500,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 2011:
26

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $382,400,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $380,200,000,000.

4 (12) Medicare (570):

5 Fiscal year 2001:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $217,500,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $217,700,000,000.

9 Fiscal year 2002:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 $229,100,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, $229,100,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 2003:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $243,900,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $243,700,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 2004:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $260,200,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, $260,400,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2005:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $291,800,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $291,700,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2006:
27

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $309,900,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $309,700,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2007:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $336,100,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $336,400,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2008:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $362,800,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $362,700,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2009:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $391,100,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $390,800,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2010:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $423,400,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $423,700,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2011:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 $459,400,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, $459,400,000,000.

24 (13) Income Security (600):

25 Fiscal year 2001:
28

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $255,900,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $256,900,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2002:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $271,500,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $272,100,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2003:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $281,800,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $282,300,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2004:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $293,300,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $292,500,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2005:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $308,100,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $306,700,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2006:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 $315,900,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, $314,400,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 2007:
29

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $323,400,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $321,900,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2008:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $337,900,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $336,500,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2009:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $349,300,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $347,600,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2010:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $359,900,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $358,200,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2011:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $371,600,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $369,400,000,000.

20 (14) Social Security (650):

21 Fiscal year 2001:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $9,800,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $9,800,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2002:
30

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $11,000,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $11,000,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2003:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $11,700,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $11,700,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2004:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $12,500,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $12,500,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2005:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $13,300,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $13,300,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2006:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $14,200,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $14,200,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2007:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 $15,200,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, $15,200,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 2008:
31

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $16,200,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $16,200,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2009:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $17,500,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $17,500,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2010:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $18,900,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $18,900,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2011:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $20,400,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $20,400,000,000.

16 (15) Veterans Benefits and Services (700):

17 Fiscal year 2001:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $46,700,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, $45,900,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2002:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $52,300,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $51,600,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2003:
32

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $53,000,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $52,800,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2004:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $55,300,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $54,900,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2005:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $59,300,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $58,900,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2006:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $58,800,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $58,300,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2007:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $58,100,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $57,700,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2008:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 $62,000,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, $61,600,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 2009:
33

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $63,400,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $63,000,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2010:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $64,700,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $64,400,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2011:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $67,100,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $66,700,000,000.

12 (16) Administration of Justice (750):

13 Fiscal year 2001:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $30,600,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $30,000,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 2002:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $30,900,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, $30,300,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2003:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $31,900,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $32,100,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2004:
34

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $33,600,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $34,100,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2005:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $34,600,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $34,700,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2006:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $35,700,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $35,300,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2007:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $36,600,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $36,100,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2008:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $37,600,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $37,100,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2009:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 $38,500,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, $38,100,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 2010:
35

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $39,200,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $38,800,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2011:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $40,800,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $40,200,000,000.

8 (17) General Government (800):

9 Fiscal year 2001:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 $16,300,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, $16,100,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 2002:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $16,700,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $16,300,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 2003:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $16,300,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, $16,300,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2004:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $16,700,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $16,600,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2005:
36

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $17,000,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $16,700,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2006:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $17,500,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $17,100,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2007:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $17,900,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $17,500,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2008:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $18,000,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $17,700,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2009:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $18,400,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $18,000,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2010:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 $18,700,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, $18,300,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 2011:
37

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $19,400,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $18,900,000,000.

4 (18) Net Interest (900):

5 Fiscal year 2001:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $273,600,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $273,600,000,000.

9 Fiscal year 2002:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 $257,600,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, $257,600,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 2003:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $253,200,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $253,200,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 2004:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $248,500,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, $248,500,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2005:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $242,400,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $242,400,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2006:
38

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $239,000,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $239,000,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2007:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $236,500,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $236,500,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2008:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $233,300,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $233,300,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2009:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $229,300,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $229,300,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2010:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $224,400,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $224,400,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2011:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 $219,100,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, $219,100,000,000.

24 (19) Allowances (920):

25 Fiscal year 2001:
39

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 ¥$500,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, ¥$300,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2002:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $5,000,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $1,800,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2003:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $5,500,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $4,000,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2004:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $6,000,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $4,800,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2005:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $6,200,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $5,700,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2006:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 $6,400,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, $6,100,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 2007:
40

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $6,600,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $6,300,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2008:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $6,700,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $6,400,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2009:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $7,000,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $6,600,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2010:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $7,200,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $6,800,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2011:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $7,500,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $7,000,000,000.

20 (20) Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950):

21 Fiscal year 2001:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 ¥$38,300,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, ¥$38,300,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2002:
41

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 ¥$42,300,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, ¥$42,300,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2003:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 ¥$52,300,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, ¥$52,300,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2004:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 ¥$53,200,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, ¥$53,200,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2005:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 ¥$45,500,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, ¥$45,500,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2006:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 ¥$46,500,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, ¥$46,500,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2007:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 ¥$48,200,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, ¥$48,200,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 2008:
42

HCON 83 RFS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 ¥$49,100,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, ¥$49,100,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 2009:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 ¥$50,200,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, ¥$50,200,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2010:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 ¥$51,800,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, ¥$51,800,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2011:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 ¥$53,300,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, ¥$53,300,000,000.

16 SEC. 4. RECONCILIATION.

17 (a) SUBMISSIONS BY THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON

18 WAYS AND MEANS FOR TAX RELIEF.—The House Com19 mittee on Ways and Means shall—

20 (1) report to the House a reconciliation bill—

21 (A) not later than May 2, 2001;

22 (B) not later than May 23, 2001; and

23 (C) not later than June 20, 2001; and
43

HCON 83 RFS

1 (2) submit to the Committee on the Budget rec2 ommendations pursuant to section (c)(2)(F)(ii) not

3 later than September 11, 2001,

4 that consists of changes in laws within its jurisdiction suf5 ficient to reduce the total level of revenues by not more

6 than: $5,783,000,000 for fiscal year 2001,

7 $64,427,000,000 for fiscal year 2002, $80,036,000,000

8 for fiscal year 2003, $106,584,000,000 for fiscal year

9 2004, $130,973,000,000 for fiscal year 2005,

10 $165,166,000,000 for fiscal year 2006, and

11 $1,625,951,000,000 for the period of fiscal year 2001

12 through 2011.

13 (b) SUBMISSIONS BY HOUSE COMMITTEES ON EN14 ERGY AND COMMERCE AND WAYS AND MEANS FOR MEDI15 CARE REFORM AND PRESCRIPTION DRUGS.—(1) Not later

16 than July 24, 2001, the House Committees named in

17 paragraph (2) shall submit their recommendations to the

18 House Committee on the Budget. After receiving those

19 recommendations, the House Committee on the Budget

20 shall report to the House a reconciliation bill carrying out

21 all such recommendations without any substantive revi22 sion.

23 (2)(A) The House Committee on Energy and Com24 merce shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction

25 that provide direct spending sufficient to increase outlays
44

HCON 83 RFS

1 by not more than the following: $2,500,000,000 for fiscal

2 year 2001, $11,200,000,000 for fiscal year 2002,

3 $12,900,000,000 for fiscal year 2003, $14,800,000,000

4 for fiscal year 2004, $12,500,000,000 for fiscal year 2005,

5 $12,800,000,000 for fiscal year 2006, and

6 $153,000,000,000 for the period of fiscal year 2001

7 through 2011.

8 (B) The House Committee on Ways and Means shall

9 report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide

10 direct spending sufficient to increase outlays by not more

11 than the following: $2,500,000,000 for fiscal year 2001,

12 $11,200,000,000 for fiscal year 2002, $12,900,000,000

13 for fiscal year 2003, $14,800,000,000 for fiscal year 2004,

14 $12,500,000,000 for fiscal year 2005, $12,800,000,000

15 for fiscal year 2006, and $153,000,000,000 for the period

16 of fiscal year 2001 through 2011.

17 (c) OTHER SUBMISSIONS BY HOUSE COMMITTEES.—

18 (1) Not later than September 11, 2001, the House Com19 mittees named in paragraph (2) shall submit their rec20 ommendations to the House Committee on the Budget.

21 After receiving those recommendations, the House Com22 mittee on the Budget shall report to the House a reconcili23 ation bill carrying out all such recommendations without

24 any substantive revision.
45

HCON 83 RFS

1 (2)(A) The House Committee on Education and the

2 Workforce shall report changes in laws within its jurisdic3 tion that provide direct spending sufficient to increase out4 lays by not more than the following: $5,000,000 for fiscal

5 year 2001, $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2002, $5,000,000

6 for fiscal year 2003, $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2004,

7 $7,000,000 for fiscal year 2005, $10,000,000 for fiscal

8 year 2006, and $87,000,000 for the period of fiscal year

9 2001 through 2011.

10 (B) The House Committee on Energy and Commerce

11 shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that

12 provide direct spending sufficient to increase outlays by

13 not more than the following: $0 for fiscal year 2001,

14 $180,000,000 for fiscal year 2002, $466,000,000 for fis15 cal year 2003, $561,000,000 for fiscal year 2004,

16 $681,000,000 for fiscal year 2005, $836,000,000 for fis17 cal year 2006, and $7,867,000,000 for the period of fiscal

18 year 2001 through 2011.

19 (C) The House Committee on Financial Services shall

20 report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide

21 direct spending sufficient to reduce revenues, as follows:

22 $0 for fiscal year 2001, $139,000,000 for fiscal year 2002,

23 $101,000,000 for fiscal year 2003, $92,000,000 for fiscal

24 year 2004, $96,000,000 for fiscal year 2005,
46

HCON 83 RFS

1 $101,000,000 for fiscal year 2006, and $1,112,000,000

2 for the period of fiscal year 2001 through 2011.

3 (D) The House Committee on Government Reform

4 shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that

5 provide direct spending sufficient to reduce outlays by not

6 less than the following: $0 for fiscal year 2001, $0 for

7 fiscal year 2002, $496,000,000 for fiscal year 2003,

8 $523,000,000 for fiscal year 2004, $501,000,000 for fis9 cal year 2005, $475,000,000 for fiscal year 2006, and

10 $3,871,000,000 for the period of fiscal year 2001 through

11 2011.

12 (E) The House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs shall

13 report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide

14 direct spending sufficient to increase outlays by not more

15 than the following: $0 for fiscal year 2001, $264,000,000

16 for fiscal year 2002, $479,000,000 for fiscal year 2003,

17 $761,000,000 for fiscal year 2004, $816,000,000 for fis18 cal year 2005, $885,000,000 for fiscal year 2006, and

19 $7,087,000,000 for the period of fiscal year 2001 through

20 2011.

21 (F)(i) The House Committee on Ways and Means

22 shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction that

23 provide direct spending sufficient to increase outlays by

24 not more than the following: $0 for fiscal year 2001,

25 $820,000,000 for fiscal year 2002, $3,035,000,000 for fis-
47

HCON 83 RFS

1 cal year 2003, $2,842,000,000 for fiscal year 2004,

2 $3,925,000,000 for fiscal year 2005, $4,267,000,000 for

3 fiscal year 2006, and $39,515,000,000 for the period of

4 fiscal year 2001 through 2011.

5 (ii) The House Committee on Ways and Means shall

6 report changes in laws within its jurisdiction sufficient to

7 reduce the total level of revenues as specified in subsection

8 (a).

9 (d) SPECIAL RULES.—In the House, if any bill re10 ported pursuant to subsection (a) or subsection

11 (c)(2)(F)(ii), amendment thereto or conference report

12 thereon, has refundable tax provisions that increase out13 lays, the chairman of the Committee on the Budget may

14 increase the amount of new budget authority provided by

15 such provisions (and outlays flowing therefrom) allocated

16 to the Committee on Ways and Means and adjust the rev17 enue levels set forth in such subsection accordingly such

18 that the increase in outlays and reduction in revenue re19 sulting from such bill does not exceed the amounts speci20 fied in subsection (a) or subsection (c)(2)(F)(ii), as appli21 cable.

22 SEC. 5. RESERVE FUND FOR EMERGENCIES.

23 (a) ALLOCATIONS FOR EMERGENCIES.—(1) In the

24 House, in addition to the allocation provided under section

25 302(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the joint
48

HCON 83 RFS

1 explanatory statement of managers accompanying this

2 resolution shall include a separate allocation of

3 $5,627,000,000 in new budget authority and

4 $2,617,000,000 in outlays for emergencies for natural dis5 asters for fiscal year 2002 to the Committee on Appropria6 tions. Such allocation shall be deemed to be an allocation

7 made under section 302(a) of the Congressional Budget

8 Act of 1974 for purposes of section 302(f)(1).

9 (2) In the House, after the reporting of a bill or joint

10 resolution by the Committee on Appropriations, or the of11 fering of an amendment thereto or the submission of a

12 conference report thereon, the chairman of the Committee

13 on Appropriations shall suballocate the amounts of new

14 budget authority and outlays allocated to it under para15 graph (1) by the amount provided by that measure for

16 an emergency for natural disasters as defined by this sec17 tion and so designated pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A)

18 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control

19 Act of 1985. Suballocations under this paragraph may be

20 made only after the Committee on Appropriations has re21 ported legislation (as adjusted for any amendments there22 to or conference reports thereon) providing at least

23 $1,923,000,000 in new budget authority for fiscal year

24 2002 for accounts identified in the joint explanatory state25 ment of managers accompanying the conference report on
49

HCON 83 RFS

1 this resolution. Such suballocations shall be deemed to be

2 suballocations made under section 302(b) of the Congres3 sional Budget Act of 1974 for purposes of section

4 302(f)(1).

5 (b) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section:

6 (1) The term ‘‘emergency’’ means a situation

7 (other than a threat to national security) that—

8 (A) requires new budget authority (and

9 outlays flowing therefrom) to prevent the immi10 nent loss of life or property or in response to

11 the loss of life or property; and

12 (B) is unanticipated.

13 (2) The term ‘‘unanticipated’’ means that the

14 underlying situation is—

15 (A) sudden, which means quickly coming

16 into being or not building up over time;

17 (B) urgent, which means a pressing and

18 compelling need requiring immediate action;

19 (C) unforeseen, which means not predicted

20 or anticipated as an emerging need; and

21 (D) temporary, which means not of a per22 manent duration.

23 (c) DEVELOPMENT OF GUIDELINES.—As soon as

24 practicable, the chairman of the Committee on the Budget

25 of the House shall, after consulting with the chairman of
50

HCON 83 RFS

1 the Committee on Appropriations of the House, publish

2 in the Congressional Record guidelines for application of

3 the definition of emergency set forth in subsection (b).

4 (d) COMMITTEE EXPLANATION OF EMERGENCY LEG5 ISLATION.—Whenever the Committee on Appropriations

6 of the House (including a committee of conference) reports

7 any bill or joint resolution that provides new budget au8 thority for any emergency, the report accompanying that

9 bill or joint resolution (or the joint explanatory statement

10 of managers in the case of a conference report on any such

11 bill or joint resolution) should explain the reasons such

12 amount designated under section 251(b)(2)(A) of the Bal13 anced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985

14 falls within the definition of emergency set forth in sub15 section (b) pursuant to the guidelines published under

16 subsection (c).

17 (e) CBO REPORT ON THE BUDGET.—The Director

18 of the Congressional Budget Office shall include in each

19 report submitted under section 202(e)(1) of the Congres20 sional Budget Act of 1974 the average annual enacted lev21 els of discretionary budget authority and the resulting out22 lays for emergencies for the 5 fiscal years preceding the

23 fiscal year of the most recently agreed to concurrent reso24 lution on the budget.
51

HCON 83 RFS

1 (f) SECTION 314(b)(1) ADJUSTMENT.—Section

2 314(b)(1) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 shall

3 not apply in the House—

4 (1) for fiscal year 2001; or

5 (2) for fiscal year 2002 or any subsequent fiscal

6 year, except for emergencies affecting national secu7 rity.

8 SEC. 6. STRATEGIC RESERVE FUND.

9 (a) ADJUSTMENTS.—In the House, the chairman of

10 the Committee on the Budget may, not later than July

11 25, 2001, increase allocations of new budget authority

12 (and outlays flowing therefrom) and adjust aggregates

13 (and adjust any other appropriate levels) for fiscal year

14 2002 for a bill making appropriations for the Department

15 of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002,

16 and for any fiscal year for a bill to reauthorize title I of

17 the Federal Agriculture Improvement Act of 1996 and

18 other appropriate legislation, reported by July 11, 2001,

19 and legislation to provide for medicare reform and a pre20 scription drug benefit; and, in the House, the chairman

21 may also make adjustments for amendments to or con22 ference reports on such bills. The chairman shall consider

23 the recommendations of the President’s National Defense

24 Review, any comparable review by the President of na25 tional agricultural policy, and any statement of adminis-
52

HCON 83 RFS

1 trative policy or supplemental budget request relating to

2 any matter referred to in the preceding sentence.

3 (b) LIMITATIONS.—(1) The adjustments for any bill

4 referred to in subsection (a) shall be in an amount not

5 to exceed the amount by which such bill breaches the ap6 plicable allocation or aggregate.

7 (2) The total adjustments made under subsection (a)

8 for any fiscal year may not cause the surplus set forth

9 in this resolution for any fiscal year, as adjusted, covered

10 by this resolution to be less than the surplus of the Fed11 eral Hospital Insurance Trust Fund for that fiscal year,

12 as determined consistent with procedures set forth in H.R.

13 2 (107th Congress), as passed the House.

14 SEC. 7. SUPPLEMENTAL RESERVE FUND FOR MEDICARE.

15 In the House, whenever a reconciliation bill is re16 ported, or an amendment thereto is offered or a conference

17 report thereon is submitted, under section 4, the chairman

18 of the Committee on the Budget may, for any of fiscal

19 years 2001 through 2011, increase any allocations and ag20 gregates of new budget authority (and outlays resulting

21 therefrom) up to the amount provided by that measure

22 to reform medicare and provide coverage for prescription

23 drugs that is in excess of the instruction to the Committee

24 on Energy and Commerce and the Committee on Ways

25 and Means under section 4(b) (and make all other appro-
53

HCON 83 RFS

1 priate adjustments). The total adjustments made under

2 this section for any fiscal year may not exceed the amount

3 by which the Congressional Budget Office’s estimate of

4 the President’s prescription drug plan (or, if such a plan

5 is not submitted in a timely manner, the Congressional

6 Budget Office’s estimate of a comparable plan submitted

7 by the chairmen of the committees of jurisdiction at levels

8 to be determined by the chairman of the Committee on

9 the Budget) exceeds the levels set forth in section 4(b)(2)

10 for the period of fiscal years 2001 through 2011.

11 SEC. 8. RESERVE FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001.

12 (a) ADJUSTMENTS.—In the House, the chairman of

13 the Committee on the Budget may increase allocations of

14 new budget authority (and outlays flowing therefrom) and

15 adjust aggregates (and adjust any other appropriate lev16 els) for fiscal year 2001 for reported bills, or amendments

17 thereto or conference reports thereon: (1) by the amount

18 of new budget authority (and the outlays resulting there19 from) provided by such measure to eliminate shortfalls for

20 the Department of Defense, for assistance for producers

21 of program crops and specialty crops, and for other critical

22 needs; and (2) by the amount of reduction in revenue

23 caused by such measure providing immediate tax relief.

24 (b) LIMITATIONS.—(1) The adjustments for any bill

25 referred to in subsection (a) shall be in an amount not
54

HCON 83 RFS

1 to exceed the amount by which such bill breaches the ap2 plicable allocation or aggregate.

3 (2) The total adjustments made under subsection (a)

4 for fiscal year 2001 may not cause the surplus set forth

5 in this resolution for that fiscal year, as adjusted, to be

6 less than the surplus of the Federal Hospital Insurance

7 Trust Fund for that fiscal year, as determined consistent

8 with procedures set forth in H.R. 2 (107th Congress), as

9 passed the House.

10 SEC. 9. RESERVE FUND FOR PROMOTION OF FULL FUND11 ING FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION.

12 In the House, whenever the Committee on Appropria13 tions reports a bill or joint resolution, or an amendment

14 thereto is offered, or a conference report thereon is sub15 mitted that provides new budget authority for fiscal year

16 2002 in excess of $6,368,000,000 for programs authorized

17 under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

18 (IDEA), the chairman of the Committee on the Budget

19 may increase the appropriate allocations of new budget au20 thority and outlays by the amount of that excess, but not

21 to exceed $1,250,000,000 (and adjust any other appro22 priate levels).
55

HCON 83 RFS

1 SEC. 10. RESERVE FUND FOR ADDITIONAL TAX CUTS AND

2 DEBT REDUCTION.

3 If the report provided pursuant to section 202(e)(2)

4 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the budget and

5 economic outlook: update (for fiscal years 2002 through

6 2011), estimates an on-budget surplus for any of fiscal

7 years 2001 through 2011 that exceeds the estimated on8 budget surplus set forth in the Congressional Budget Of9 fice’s January 2001 budget and economic outlook for such

10 fiscal year, the chairman of the Committee on the Budget

11 of the House may, in an amount not to exceed the increase

12 in such surplus for that fiscal year—

13 (1) reduce the recommended level of Federal

14 revenues and make other appropriate adjustments

15 (including the reconciliation instructions) for that

16 fiscal year;

17 (2) reduce the appropriate level of the public

18 debt, increase the amount of the surplus, and make

19 other appropriate adjustments for that fiscal year;

20 or

21 (3) any combination of paragraphs (1) and (2).

22 SEC. 11. APPLICATION AND EFFECT OF CHANGES IN ALLO23 CATIONS AND AGGREGATES.

24 (a) APPLICATION.—Any adjustments of allocations

25 and aggregates made pursuant to this resolution shall—
56

HCON 83 RFS

1 (1) apply while that measure is under consider2 ation;

3 (2) take effect upon the enactment of that

4 measure; and

5 (3) be published in the Congressional Record as

6 soon as practicable.

7 (b) EFFECT OF CHANGED ALLOCATIONS AND AG8 GREGATES.—Revised allocations and aggregates resulting

9 from these adjustments shall be considered for the pur10 poses of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 as alloca11 tions and aggregates contained in this resolution.

12 (c) BUDGET COMMITTEE DETERMINATIONS.—For

13 purposes of this resolution—

14 (1) the levels of new budget authority, outlays,

15 direct spending, new entitlement authority, revenues,

16 deficits, and surpluses for a fiscal year or period of

17 fiscal years shall be determined on the basis of esti18 mates made by the Committee on the Budget of the

19 House of Representatives; and

20 (2) such chairman, as applicable, may make

21 any other necessary adjustments to such levels to

22 carry out this resolution, and any adjustments per23 mitted under sections 6, 7, and 8 may include

24 changes in the appropriate reconciliation instruc25 tions.
57

HCON 83 RFS

1 SEC. 12. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 13301 OF THE BUDG2 ET ENFORCEMENT ACT OF 1990.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the House, notwithstanding

4 section 302(a)(1) of the Congressional Budget Act of

5 1974 and section 13301 of the Budget Enforcement Act

6 of 1990, the joint explanatory statement accompanying

7 the conference report on any concurrent resolution on the

8 budget shall include in its allocation under section 302(a)

9 of such Act to the Committee on Appropriations amounts

10 for the discretionary administrative expenses of the Social

11 Security Administration.

12 (b) SPECIAL RULE.—In the House, for purposes of

13 applying section 302(f) of the Congressional Budget Act

14 of 1974, estimates of the level of total new budget author15 ity and total outlays provided by a measure shall include

16 any discretionary amounts provided for the Social Security

17 Administration.

18 SEC. 13. RESTRICTIONS ON ADVANCE APPROPRIATIONS.

19 For purposes of title III of the Congressional Budget

20 Act of 1974, advance appropriations shall be scored as

21 new budget authority for the fiscal year in which the ap22 propriations are enacted, except that advance appropria23 tions up to the levels specified in the joint explanatory

24 statement of managers accompanying this resolution for

25 programs, projects, activities or accounts identified in

26 such joint statement shall continue to be scored as new
58

HCON 83 RFS

1 budget authority in the year in which they first become

2 available for obligation.

3 SEC. 14. FEDERAL EMPLOYEE PAY.

4 (a) FINDINGS.—The House of Representatives finds

5 the following:

6 (1) Members of the uniformed services and ci7 vilian employees of the United States make signifi8 cant contributions to the general welfare of the Na9 tion.

10 (2) Increases in the pay of members of the uni11 formed services and of civilian employees of the

12 United States have not kept pace with increases in

13 the overall pay levels of workers in the private sec14 tor, so that there now exists—

15 (A) a 32 percent gap between compensa16 tion levels of Federal civilian employees and

17 compensation levels of private sector workers;

18 and

19 (B) an estimated 10 percent gap between

20 compensation levels of members of the uni21 formed services and compensation levels of pri22 vate sector workers.

23 (3) The President’s budget proposal for fiscal

24 year 2002 includes a 4.6 percent pay raise for mili25 tary personnel.
59

HCON 83 RFS

1 (4) The Office of Management and Budget has

2 requested that Federal agencies plan their fiscal

3 year 2002 budgets with a 3.6 percent pay raise for

4 civilian Federal employees.

5 (5) In almost every year during the past 2 dec6 ades, there have been equal adjustments in the com7 pensation of members of the uniformed services and

8 the compensation of civilian employees of the United

9 States.

10 (b) SENSE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.—

11 It is the sense of the House of Representatives that rates

12 of compensation for civilian employees of the United

13 States should be adjusted at the same time, and in the

14 same proportion, as are rates of compensation for mem15 bers of the uniformed services.

16 SEC. 15. ASSET BUILDING FOR THE WORKING POOR.

17 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress find the following:

18 (1) For the vast majority of United States

19 households, the pathway to the economic main20 stream and financial security is not through spend21 ing and consumption, but through savings, investing,

22 and the accumulation of assets.

23 (2) One-third of all Americans have no assets

24 available for investment and another 20 percent

25 have only negligible assets. The situation is even
60

HCON 83 RFS

1 more serious for minority households; for example,

2 60 percent of African-American households have no

3 or negative financial assets.

4 (3) Nearly 50 percent of all children in America

5 live in households that have no assets available for

6 investment, including 40 percent of Caucasian chil7 dren and 73 percent of African-American children.

8 (4) Up to 20 percent of all United States

9 households do not deposit their savings in financial

10 institutions and, thus, do not have access to the

11 basic financial tools that make asset accumulation

12 possible.

13 (5) Public policy can have either a positive or

14 a negative impact on asset accumulation. Traditional

15 public assistance programs based on income and

16 consumption have rarely been successful in sup17 porting the transition to economic self-sufficiency.

18 Tax policy, through $288,000,000,000 in annual tax

19 incentives, has helped lay the foundation for the

20 great middle class.

21 (6) Lacking an income tax liability, low-income

22 working families cannot take advantage of asset de23 velopment incentives available through the Federal

24 tax code.
61

HCON 83 RFS

1 (7) Individual Development Accounts have prov2 en to be successful in helping low-income working

3 families save and accumulate assets. Individual De4 velopment Accounts have been used to purchase

5 long-term, high-return assets, including homes, post6 secondary education and training, and small busi7 ness.

8 (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con9 gress that the Federal tax code should support a signifi10 cant expansion of Individual Development Accounts so

11 that millions of low-income, working families can save,

12 build assets, and move their lives forward; thus, making

13 positive contributions to the economic and social well14 being of the United States, as well as to its future.

15 SEC. 16. FEDERAL FIRE PREVENTION ASSISTANCE.

16 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following:

17 (1) Increased demands on firefighting and

18 emergency medical personnel have made it difficult

19 for local governments to adequately fund necessary

20 fire safety precautions.

21 (2) The Government has an obligation to pro22 tect the health and safety of the firefighting per23 sonnel of the United States and to ensure that they

24 have the financial resources to protect the public.
62

HCON 83 RFS

1 (3) The high rates in the United States of

2 death, injury, and property damage caused by fires

3 demonstrates a critical need for Federal investment

4 in support of firefighting personnel.

5 (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con6 gress that the Government should support the core oper7 ations of the Federal Emergency Management Agency by

8 providing needed fire grant programs to assist our fire9 fighters and rescue personnel as they respond to more

10 than 17,000,000 emergency calls annually. To accomplish

11 this task, Congress supports preservation of the Assist12 ance to Firefighters grant program. Continued support of

13 the Assistance to Firefighters grant program will enable

14 local firefighters to adequately protect the lives of count15 less Americans put at risk by insufficient fire protection.

16 SEC. 17. SALES TAX DEDUCTION.

17 (a) FINDINGS.—The House finds that—

18 (1) in 1986 the ability to deduct State sales

19 taxes was eliminated from the Federal tax code;

20 (2) the States of Tennessee, Texas, Wyoming,

21 Washington, Florida, Nevada, and South Dakota

22 have no State income tax;

23 (3) the citizens of those seven States continue

24 to be treated unfairly by paying significantly more in

25 taxes to the Government than taxpayers with an
63

HCON 83 RFS

1 identical profile in different State because they are

2 prohibited from deducting their State sales taxes

3 from their Federal income taxes in lieu of a State

4 income tax;

5 (4) the design of the Federal tax code is pref6 erential in its treatment of States with State income

7 taxes over those without State income taxes;

8 (5) the current Federal tax code infringes upon

9 States’ rights to tax their citizens as they see fit in

10 that the Federal tax code exerts unjust influence on

11 States without State income taxes to impose one

12 their citizens;

13 (6) the current surpluses that our Government

14 holds provide an appropriate time and opportunity

15 to allow taxpayers to deduct either their State sales

16 taxes or their State income taxes from their Federal

17 income tax returns; and

18 (7) over 50 Members of the House have cospon19 sored legislation to restore the sales tax deduction

20 option to the Federal tax code.

21 (b) SENSE OF HOUSE.—It is the sense of the House

22 of Representatives that the Committee on Ways and

23 Means should consider legislation that makes State sales

24 tax deductible against Federal income taxes.
64

HCON 83 RFS

1 SEC. 18. FUNDING FOR GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION

2 AT CHILDREN’S TEACHING HOSPITALS.

3 It is the sense of Congress that:

4 (1) Function 550 of the President’s budget

5 should include an appropriate level of funding for

6 graduate medical education conducted at inde7 pendent children’s teaching hospitals in order to en8 sure access to care by millions of children nation9 wide.

10 (2) An emphasis should be placed on the role

11 played by community health centers in underserved

12 rural and urban communities. An increase in fund13 ing for community health centers should not come at

14 the expense of the Community Access Program.

15 Both programs should be funded adequately, with

16 the intention of doubling funding for increased ca17 pacity for community health centers, in addition to

18 keeping the Community Access Program operational.

19 (3) The medicare program should emphasize

20 such preventive medical services as those provided by

21 vision rehabilitation professionals in saving Govern22 ment funds and preserving the independence of a

23 growing number of seniors in the coming years.

24 (4) Funding under function 550 should also re25 flect the importance of the Ryan White CARE Act

26 to persons afflicted with HIV/AIDS. Funds allocated
65

HCON 83 RFS

1 from the CARE Act serve as the safety net for thou2 sands of low-income people living with HIV/AIDS

3 who reside in metropolitan areas but are ineligible

4 for entitlement programs. Moreover, the CARE Act

5 provides critically needed grants directly to existing

6 community-based clinics and public health providers

7 to develop and deliver both early and ongoing com8 prehensive services to persons with HIV/AIDS.

9 SEC. 19. CONCURRENT RETIREMENT AND DISABILITY BEN10 EFITS TO RETIRED MEMBERS OF THE ARMED

11 FORCES.

12 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that the Secretary of

13 Defense is the appropriate official for evaluating the exist14 ing standards for the provision of concurrent retirement

15 and disability benefits to retired members of the Armed

16 Forces and the need to change these standards.

17 (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con18 gress that—

19 (1) the Secretary of Defense should report to

20 the congressional committees of jurisdiction on the

21 provision of concurrent retirement and disability

22 benefits to retired members of the Armed Forces;

23 (2) the report should address the number of in24 dividuals retired from the Armed Forces who would

25 otherwise be eligible for disability compensation, the
66

HCON 83 RFS

1 comparability of the policy to Office of Personnel

2 Management guidelines for civilian Federal retirees,

3 the applicability of this policy to prevailing private

4 sector standards, the number of individuals poten5 tially eligible for concurrent benefits who receive

6 other forms of Federal assistance and the cost of

7 that assistance, and alternative initiatives that would

8 accomplish the same end as concurrent receipt of

9 military retired pay and disability compensation;

10 (3) the Secretary of Defense should submit leg11 islation that he considers appropriate; and

12 (4) upon receiving such report, the committees

13 of jurisdiction, working with the Committees on the

14 Budget of the House and Senate, should consider

15 appropriate legislation.

Passed the House of Representatives March 28,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.

By MARTHA C. MORRISON,

Deputy Clerk.