alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
02/03/20T T 15:3 2 FA X 202433514 2 FA A^ DM S 8)001/00 2



# • : mOPERATION

S wi. i w ^.i ^ - f e -120t t {T P - 1 p U;.f>bDEPARTMENT O FTRANSPORTATIO N , - ^ r^.a. ^ -.- . ^ 

# iE D 3 ^ II-Pb

- OFFIC EO FHEARING S ^EARIN G DOCKE T WASHINGTON , D.C . I N THE MATFE RO F FLIGHTSTA RAIRCRAF T SERVICES , INC . FA A Docke t

No . CPIOGT.OO

I 1 (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) DM S No . FAA-2010-107 5 Th e Honorabl e RichardC . Goodwi n RESPONDENT' S NOTIC E O FWITHDRAWA LO FHEARIN GREQliES T PLEASI : TAK

E NOTICE , tha

t Flightsia r Aircraf t Services , Inc. , Responden t herein , b y an dthroug h undersigne dcounsel , pursuan t t o th e Rule s o f

Practic e (1 4 C.F.R . Par

t 13) , hereb y withdraw s it s reques t

for aliearin g i

n thii s matter . Th e partie s hav e agree dt o afull an dfina l settlemcn i o f

thi s matter . A

n aresult , ahearin g o n th e merit s i s n o longer

necessary . WHERF,FORE , Respondent , Flightsta r Aiicraf t Services , Inc. , respectfull y request s that th e above-capiione dmatter b e terminate dwit

h prejudice .02/03/201 1 15;3 3 FA X 202493514 2 FA A * DM S g|002/00 2



### Dated : Januar

y 26 , 201 1 Respectfully su)?mitfed ,

GRE(4QR Y 

### J5 . VITNTON, ESQ . On e RweaijdhrUour

t Suite^S O Rockville,M D 2085 0 Tel : (301 ) 294-855 0 Fax:(301)294-252 5 GreK@AviationLawL:xpcrts.co m Counse l fo

r Responden tc* DM S @l003/00 3 02/03/201 1 15:3 3 FA X 202483514 2 FA A

CERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E T hereb y certif

y tha i 1 hav e ihi s dat e serve db y regular U.S . mail , postag e prepaid , a n origina l An d on e (1 ) cop y ol " ih c foregoing Notic e o f Withdrawa l addrcs.>ic

dto : Attention : Hrsria g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Federa l Aviaiio n Adminigtratio n 800 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Suit e 2 W l 000 Washington , D.C

- 205<) ) And . fiirthcr, cha

t I hav e thi s dat e serve dvi afacsimil e an dregula r U.S . mail , postag e prqiaid , a cop y o f th e foregoin g Notic e o f

Withdrawa l adJrc.s-:icdto : Th e Honorahl e Richar dC . Goodwi n Admini-Strativ e La w JudHc U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e olTTeariTurs , M-2 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . EaB t Building , Groun dKInor, Roo m1-12-320 Wa.<!hln)[!ton

, D C 2059 0 Fax : 202-366-753 6 Glen n L . Brow n Senio r Attorne y Offic e o f thi i Regiona l Counse l Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Grea t Lakr s Region , ACTL- 7 230 0 Dcvdn Avenu e De s Plainc.? . I L6001 8 Tel : 847-294-706 3 I'ax ; 8^7-294-749 8 Dated : Januar y 26 , 201 1 /INTON , ESQ . /ioji^/awFiir n tfrchCour t Suit e 45 0 Rockville , M D 2085 0
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 19

- 00283

- CR

VANESSA DENISE BATEM AN , Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 82nd District Court Falls County, Texas Trial Court No. 10032

- CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Vanessa Denise Bateman was convicted of Assault Causing Bodily Injury, Family

Violence

. She was placed on community supervision which was ultimately revoked . She
was sentenced to eight years in prison. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Bateman ’s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief in
support of the motion as serting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and
that, in his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Counsel's brief evidences a professional evaluation of the record for error and complianceBateman v. State Page 2

with the other duties of appointed counsel. We conclude that counsel has performed the
duties required of appointed counsel. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744; High v. State , 573 S.W.2d
807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); s ee also Kelly v. State , 436 S. W.3d 313, 319

- 320 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2014); In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403, 407 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).
In reviewing an Anders appeal, we must, "after a full examination of all the
proceedings, ... decide whether the case is wholly frivolous." Anders , 386 U.S. at 744; see

Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988); accord Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 509

- 11 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is "wholly frivolous" or "without merit" when it "lacks any

basis in law or fact." McCoy v. Court of Appeals , 486 U.S. 429, 439 n. 10 (1988). In our
review, we have paid particular attention to the issues identified in appellant’s pro se
response to h er counsel’s brief in support of the motion to withdraw. After a review of
the entire record in this ap peal, we have determined the appeal to be wholly frivolous. 1

See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

- 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we affirm
the trial court's judgment.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation of Bateman is granted.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice

1 We note that the trial court took judicial notice of the “entire court’s file.” However, the entire court’s file is not in the appellate record. Nevertheless, the community supervision officer testified that Bateman was required to complete SAFP and did not because she was kicked out due to her behavior . The officer’s testimony was not challenged. The trial court only needed a preponderance of the evidence to revoke Bateman’s community supervision

. Hacker v. State , 389 S.W.3d 860, 864

- 65 (Tex. Crim. Ap p. 2013)

. Th us, th e record we have is sufficient to support the trial court’s decision to revoke Bateman’s community supervision.Bateman v. State Page 3

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Affirmed; motion granted Opinion delivered and filed February 26 , 2020 Do not publish [CR25]
#### Ex parte State of Alabama. (In re Charles JOHNSON v. STATE of Alabama).

1921585.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Sept. 17, 1993.

*715James H. Evans, Atty. Gen., and Jean Williams Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

Gordon G. Armstrong III, Mobile, for respondent.

HOUSTON, Justice.

Because this is a ease of first impression on an issue that should be ultimately determined by this Court, the State of Alabama petitioned for certiorari review, even though it conceded the correctness of the holding of the Court of Criminal Appeals that the crime of assault in the second degree is a crime of moral turpitude. *Johnson v. State,*629 So.2d 708 (Ala.Cr.App.1993). We agree with the Court of Criminal Appeals. Assault in the second degree is a crime of moral turpitude, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES and KENNEDY, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21764-21765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8646]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. NJ12-7-000]


United States Department of Energy and Bonneville Power 
Administration; Notice of Petition for Declaratory Order

    Take notice that on March 29, 2012, pursuant to sections 35.28(e) 
and 207 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 35.28(e) and 18 CFR 385.207, 
the Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville), submitted certain 
amendment to its Open Access Transmission Tariff (tariff) and a 
Petition for Declaratory Order requesting the Commission find that 
Bonneville's tariff, as amended by this filing, substantially conforms 
or is superior to the Commission's pro forma tariff and that Bonneville 
satisfies the requirements for reciprocity status.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies

[[Page 21765]]

of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7e383b2c3d31101217101b2d0b0e0e110c0a3e181b0c1d50191108"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3e787b6c7d71505257505b6d4b4e4e514c4a7e585b4c5d10595148">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 30, 2012.

    Dated: April 4, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8646 Filed 4-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 10.3
                                                     ------------
                    CHANGE IN TERMS AGREEMENT
                    -------------------------


  Principal    Loan Date   Maturity  Loan No. Call/Co   Account
-------------  ---------  ---------- -------- -------  ----------
$5,000,000.00  8-15-2005  ll-30-2005 09424896          9380022966

Officer    Initials
-------    --------
 288

References  in the shaded area are for Lender's use only  and  do
not  limit  the applicability of this document to any  particular
loan  or  item.  Any item above containing ***** has been omitted
due to text length limitations.

=================================================================

Borrower: Micronetics, Inc.         Lender:  TD Banknorth, N.A.
          26 Hampshire Drive                 300 Franklin Street
          Hudson, NH  03051                  Manchester, NH 03101


Principal  Amount:  $5,000,000.00         Interest  Rate:  5.820%
                   Date of Agreement: August 15, 2005


DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING INDEBTEDNESS.  A Promissory Note  in  the
original  principal amount of $5,000,000.00 dated  May  10,  2005
from  Borrower  to Lender together with all renewals,  amendments
and modifications.

DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE IN TERMS.  Temporary extension of  maturity
date from July 31, 2005 to November 30, 2005.

CONTINUING  VALIDITY.   Except  as  expressly  changed  by   this
Agreement,  the terms of the original obligation or  obligations,
including all agreements evidenced or securing the obligation(s),
remain unchanged and in full force and effect.  Consent by Lender
to  this  Agreement  does  not waive  Lender's  right  to  strict
performance of the obligation(s) as changed, nor obligate  Lender
to  make  any future change in terms.  Nothing in this  Agreement
will  constitute a satisfaction of the obligation(s).  It is  the
intention  of Lender to retain as liable parties all  makers  and
endorsers  of the original obligation(s), including accommodation
parties,  unless  a  party is expressly  released  by  Lender  in
writing.  Any maker or endorser, including accommodation  makers,
will  not be released by virtue of this Agreement.  If any person
who  signed the original obligation does not sign this  Agreement
below,  then  all  persons signing below  acknowledge  that  this
Agreement is given conditionally, based on the representation  to
Lender  that  the non-signing party consents to the  changes  and
provisions of this Agreement or otherwise will not be released by
it.   This  waiver  applies not only to  any  initial  extension,
modification or release, but also to all such subsequent actions.

PRIOR TO SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT, BORROWER READ AND UNDERSTOOD ALL
THE  PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT.  BORROWER AGREES TO THE  TERMS
OF THE AGREEEMENT.


BORROWER:

MICRONETICS, INC.



By:/s/David Robbins
   ------------------------------
   David Robbins,
   President of Micronetics, Inc.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**INTERLINE BRANDS, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Interline Brands, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 26, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, ThomasJ. Tossavainen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| /S/  THOMAS J. TOSSAVAINEN |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Thomas  J. Tossavainen     |
| Chief  Financial Officer   |
| August 3, 2009        |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1
                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, John C. Roman, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form 10-Q of  Naugatuck  Valley
Financial Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
      disclosure  controls and procedures to be designed under our  supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,  including
      its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
      entities,  particularly  during the  period in which this  report is being
      prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions  about  the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,  as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c)  disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
      control over  financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,  or is reasonably
      likely to  materially  affect,  the  registrant's  internal  control  over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all  significant  deficiencies  and material  weakness in the design or
      operation  of  internal   control  over  financial   reporting  which  are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2005


By: /s/ John C. Roman
    -----------------------
    President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       18
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 10, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________ No. 04-40347 Summary Calendar

_______________________ JOHN PERRY LOVE, Plaint iff, versus STATE OF TEXAS; BILLY RAY NELSON; EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE STATE BAR OF TEXAS; STATE BAR OF TEXAS, Defendants-Appellees, versus ELIJAH W. RATCLIFF Movant-Appellant.

______________________________________________________________________________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin

(9:03-cv-170)

______________________________________________________________________________ Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges. * PER CURIAM: The appeal in this case is hereby dismissed as Elijah Ratcliff has no standing to appeal this matter.
(a)  A
        review of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s activities and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2022, as amended (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as
        seller, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”) and sponsor, and Toyota Auto Receivables 2022-A Owner Trust, as issuer, during the year ended December 31, 2023 has been made under my supervision.
  (b)  To


        the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.
    /s/ James Schofield
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

I, Tae-Sik Yoon, Chief Financial Officer of JER Investors Trust Inc.,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of JER Investors Trust Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The Registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 9, 2006
Fw: Doug Nelson Memo, Re: EPA's permitting questions Allison Wiedeman
to: Jack Faulk 12/07/2009 10:50 AM Show Details

History: This message has been forwarded.

Plse distribute and let's discuss

----------------- Sent by EPA Wireless E-Mail Services

From: Paul Zimmerman [PZimmerm an@croplifeamerica.org] Sent: 12/07/2009 10:06 AM EST To: Allison Wiedeman Cc: Doug Nelson <DNelson@ croplifeamerica.org> Subject: Doug Nelson Memo, Re: EPA's permitting questions

Dear Allison Wiedeman,

A ttached is a memorandum from Doug Nelson ans wering the EPA's permitting questions.

Regards,

Paul Zimmerman Legal Administrative Assistant CropLife America pzimmerman@croplifeamerica.org Page 1 of 1

5/11/2010 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\ j faulk\Local Settin g s\Tem p \notesFCBCEE\~web6968.htm
canada1rchallenqerTIMELIMITS/MAINTENANCECHECKSPSP605TEMPORARYREVISIONNO.5-157INSERTINSECTION5-10-30FACINGPAGE48REASONFORISSUE:TorevisetheintervalandaddaPHASE-INrulefortask57-40-00-160*(OutboardFlap-HingeBoxForwardLugs).ACTION:Replacetask57-40-00-160*withthetaskthatfollows:NOTE:RecordtheincorporationofthisTemporaryRevision ontheyellowRECORDOFTEMPORARYREVISIONSandtheLISTOFEFFECTIVETEMPORARYREVISIONSsheetsatthefrontofthispublication.TR5-157Page1of2Jul08/2013MAINTENANCEMANUAL-CH.5REFERENCE57-40-00-160*canada1rchallenqerTIMELIMITS/MAINTENANCECHECKSPSP605CHAPTER57CHECKSDESCRIPTIONOutboardFlap-HingeBoxForwardLugs.•NOTCheck.(Ref.PSP612,Part6,ET-57-40-10,PartB)PHASE-IN:Foraircraftwithmorethan7500Landingsbutnotmorethan11350LandingsatthedateofthisTemporaryRevision,dothischeckwithin500Landingsbutnotlaterthan11600Landings.Foraircraftwithmorethan11350LandingsatthedateofthisTemporaryRevision,dothischeckwithinthenext250Landings.CHECKINTERVAL8000TLANDINGS3600RLANDINGSSeeNOTEZONE·584684ACCESS581-BB-DB-FB584-BB-DB-FB681-BB-DB-FB684-BB-DB-FBTR5-157Page2of2Jul08/2013