alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, David R. White, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IASIS Healthcare LLC;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:February 14, 2008         /s/ David R. White   David R. White   Chairman of the Boardand Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Gerard Herlihy, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Splinex Technology Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the small business issuer and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the smallbusiness issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during thesmall business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small businessissuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors andthe audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.         By:                                     /s/ Gerard Herlihy    Gerard Herlihy  February 14, 2005  Chief Financial Officer
# Capacity Utiliztion

# Bid Array
From: Lochmann, Robert E- Anchorage, AK 

Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 6:31 PM 

To: Simpson, Mary Ann - Washington, DC 

·· .. -.;··1 

f .. ;\.f. 

Subject: RE: Anything new with the Akutan Negotiations? 

Mary Ann 

After the postal service read Grants bid and their nc;1rrative that expressed similar concerns noted in Karen's message 

below, I met with Grant Aviations president Bruce Mc(!lasson to discuss those issues. I indicated to Bruce that we would 

not penalize Grant for not being able to fly their posted schedule when weather and sea conditions prevented them 

from operating and transporting mails. I explained to Bruce that we have not fined PenAir nor have we penalized them 

for not operating their posted schedule because we know how difficult the conditions are in that area of Alaska. Rather, 

we work with the air carrier and have developed a sound approach that does not place any undue pressure on the air 

transportation supplier. 

We also noted their concern about the hovercraft reliability and we indicated to Grant Aviation that we would consider 

allowing Grant to acquire a mail storage facility on Akun Island to increase their reliability to Akun Island despite the 

hovercraft not being able to run due to sea conditions. They appreciated hearing that. 

So the postal service has addressed all of Grants postal concerns aired in their initial EAS Bid narrative. I know this 

because I specifically asked Bruce in the meeting and his response was that he felt that our responses were reasonable 

and positioned Grant to move forward with pursuing the EAS service. 

Bob Lochmann 

Manager Transportation and Networks 

Alaska District 

From: Simpson, Mary Ann- Washington, DC 

Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 12:36 PM 

1
Exhibit 35.1





Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.








This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 17, 2021 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-3 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.  I further certify as follows:





1. I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022, and its performance under the Agreement.





2. To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.








AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.





By:/s/ Connie CoffeyDated:March 3, 2023Connie CoffeyExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2009

d1019 

# Order

October 26, 2009

138100(62)

LORRAINE HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138100 COA: 280049 Wayne CC: 06-610484-NO KIMBERLY LANGFORD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 7, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

C ORRIGAN , J., would grant the motion for recons ideration for the reasons set forth in Justice Markman’s dissenting statement in this case, 483 Mich 1125 (2009).

M ARKMAN , J., would grant the motion for recons ideration and, on reconsideration, would vacate this Court’s order of July 7, 2009, and reverse the Court of Appeals for the reasons set forth in his dissenting statem ent in this case, 483 Mich 1125 (2009).
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-40075

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Abigail Nunez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:19-CR-1097-3

Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Abigail Nunez has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Nunez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 11, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-40075 Document: 00515974636 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/11/2021
No. 21-40075

2

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-40075 Document: 00515974636 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/11/2021
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 102 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 102

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  guarantee the right to recite the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 26, 2002

  Mr. Pickering introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
  guarantee the right to recite the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. The first article of amendment to the Constitution of 
the United States shall not be construed to prohibit the recitation of 
the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.''.
                                 <all>
```
Agricultural Marketing Service, Commodity Procurement Staff

1400 Independence Ave., SW, Room 3522-S, STOP 0239

Washington, DC 20250-0239

Voice 202.720.4517 Fax 202.720.5871

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

DATE: April 3, 2015

USDA CONCORD GRAPE JUICE PURCHASE PROGRAM ANNOUNCED:

The U.S. Department of Agriculture today announced plans to purchase Concord grape juice for 

surplus removal.

An Invitation for Bid (solicitation) will be issued in the near future for deliveries July 16, 2015

through November 30, 2015. All offers must be submitted electronically through the Web-Based 

Supply Chain Management (WBSCM) website at

http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?navid=WBSCM. Offers submitted by any

means other than WBSCM will be considered non-responsive.

Offerors are urged to review all documents as they pertain to this program, including the AMS

Master Solicitation for Commodity Procurements, dated April 2015; any applicable Commodity 

Specification identified in the subsequent solicitation(s); and the Qualification Requirements for 

Prospective Vendors, dated October 2014. These documents are available on the AMS 

Commodity Procurement website at www.ams.usda.gov/commoditypurchasing.

Offerors must read all terms of the applicable Solicitation(s) when it is issued. To receive 

electronic (e-mail) notification of the issuance of these solicitations, see the “Subscribe to AMS 

CP News (link)” available on the AMS Commodity Procurement website. 

Inquiries may be made by telephoning (202) 720-4517 or addressing the Contracting Officer, 

USDA/AMS Commodity Procurement Staff, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, STOP 0239, 

Washington, DC 20250-0256. An electronic version of this Purchase Announcement can be 

found at the Commodity Procurement Website: http://www.ams.usda.gov/commoditypurchasing.

The USDA prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national 

origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental 

status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic 

information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to 

all programs and/or employment activities.) To file a complaint of discrimination, write: USDA, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil 

Rights, Office of Adjudication, 1400 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (866) 632-9992 (Toll-free Customer 

Service), (800) 877-8339 (Local or Federal relay), (866) 377-8642 (Relay voice users). 

Together We’re Making a Difference: American Agriculture for the American People
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ FREDDIE M. KOTEKName:
    
    Freddie M. KotekTitle:
    
    Chairman of the Board of DirectorsChief Financial Officer and President of the Managing General
PartnerDate:
    
    November 12, 2010
Exhibit 31.2
                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Lee R. Schlesinger, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form 10-Q of  Naugatuck  Valley
Financial Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
      disclosure  controls and procedures to be designed under our  supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,  including
      its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
      entities,  particularly  during the  period in which this  report is being
      prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions  about  the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,  as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c)  disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
      control over  financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,  or is reasonably
      likely to  materially  affect,  the  registrant's  internal  control  over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all  significant  deficiencies  and material  weakness in the design or
      operation  of  internal   control  over  financial   reporting  which  are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2005


By: /s/ Lee R. Schlesinger
    -----------------------------
    Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)


                                       16
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-10122

Conference Calendar

 

JONATHAN MARSHALL, SR., (Joe),

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; STATE OF TEXAS; 

256TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, Family Court; 

U.S. ATTORNEY, Department of Justice; 

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; INTERNAL 

REVENUE SERVICE; TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC 

SAFETY; U.S. DISTRICT COURT, Northern 

District of Texas; CHARLES R. FULBRUGE, III, 

Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit; 

STATE APPELLATE COURT, Fifth District at 

Dallas; JIM BOWLES, Sheriff of Dallas County; 

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:99-CV-1733-P

--------------------

August 23, 2000

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Jonathan Marshall, Sr., Texas prisoner # 96032321, seeks

leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in the appeal of the

dismissal of his civil rights complaint. The district court

certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that Marshall’s
No. 00-10122

-2-

appeal was not taken in good faith. Marshall’s motion for IFP is

treated as a challenge to the district court’s certification. 

See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).

Because Marshall fails to show that he will raise a

meritorious issue on appeal, his motion to proceed IFP is DENIED. 

Marshall has abandoned the argument that the district court’s

dismissal of his complaint for failure to prosecute, pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), was an abuse of discretion by failing to

brief it. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir.

1993). Even had he briefed the argument, it is without merit. 

The district court did not err in certifying that an appeal would

be frivolous. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. 

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); Baugh,

117 F.3d at 202 n.24 (5th Cir. 1997); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

The dismissal of this appeal counts as Marshall’s second

strike for purposes of § 1915(g). See Marshall v. United States,

No. 98-10056 (5th Cir. July 24, 1998); see also Adepegba v.

Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Marshall is

WARNED that if he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed 

IFP in any civil action or appeal while he is incarcerated or

detained in any facility unless he is in imminent danger of

serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). 

IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING

ISSUED.