alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER OF A BATEMENT

Appellate case name: Eva Casas v. Castano Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Cube Investments

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00326

- CV

Trial court case number: 2018

- 70094

Trial court: 215th District Court of Harris County

On January 14, 2022, appellant Eva Casas and the receiver for appellee Castano

Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Cube Investments filed a Joint Motion for Extension of Time for a Ruling

on the Dismissal or Decision on the Case, asking this Court to delay any decision in the above

styled appeal until at least February 15, 2022

, so that the parties may attempt to settle their dispute.

The Court construes the joint motion as a motion to abate the appeal pending settlement

neg otiations.

The motion is GRANTED . T he appeal is abated until Fe bruary 15, 2022. If the parties

have finalized a settlement by that date, they are instructed to file a motion to dismiss in accordance

with the settlement agreement. If the parties have not fi nalized a settlement by that date, they are

instructed to file a report informing this Court of the status of the settlement negotiations.

All appellate deadlines are tolled during the period of abatement.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s Amparo Guerra

Acting individually

Date: January 20, 2022
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 700 

Relative to the death of the Honorable Walter ‘‘Dee’’ Huddleston, former 

United States Senator for the Commonwealth of Kentucky. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2018 

Mr. MCCONNELL submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Relative to the death of the Honorable Walter ‘‘Dee’’ Huddleston, former United States Senator for the Commonwealth of Kentucky. 

Whereas the Honorable Walter ‘‘Dee’’ Huddleston served the 

people of Kentucky in the United States Senate for 12 

years; 

Whereas the Honorable Walter ‘‘Dee’’ Huddleston served as 

a member of a number of Senate committees, including— 

(1) the Committee on Appropriations; 

(2) the Committee on Agriculture and Forestry and 

the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry; 

and 

(3) the Select Committee on Intelligence; 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 700 ATS 

Whereas the Honorable Walter ‘‘Dee’’ Huddleston was an ardent defender of the tobacco and coal interests of Kentucky in the United States Senate; 

Whereas the Honorable Walter ‘‘Dee’’ Huddleston was elected to serve the people of Kentucky in the Kentucky State 

Senate from 1965 to 1972; 

Whereas the Honorable Walter ‘‘Dee’’ Huddleston was a respected radio broadcaster; 

Whereas the Honorable Walter ‘‘Dee’’ Huddleston graduated 

from the University of Kentucky in 1949; 

Whereas the Honorable Walter ‘‘Dee’’ Huddleston served in 

the United States Army as a tank gunner during World 

War II; and 

Whereas the Honorable Walter ‘‘Dee’’ Huddleston served the 

United States and the Commonwealth of Kentucky with 

distinction: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) the Senate has heard with profound sorrow 

3 and deep regret the announcement of the death of 

4 the Honorable Walter ‘‘Dee’’ Huddleston, former 

5 member of the United States Senate; 

6 (2) the Secretary of the Senate communicate 

7 this resolution to the House of Representatives and 

8 transmit an enrolled copy thereof to the family of 

9 the deceased; and 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 700 ATS 

1 (3) when the Senate adjourns today, it stand 

2 adjourned as a further mark of respect to the mem3 ory of the Honorable Walter ‘‘Dee’’ Huddleston. 

Æ 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 35.1





Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.








This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 22, 2022 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-2 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.  I further certify as follows:





1. I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from June 22, 2022 through December 31, 2022, and its performance under the Agreement.





2. To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.








AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.





By:/s/ Connie CoffeyDated:March 3, 2023Connie CoffeyExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
Carbon Infusion Use for NCS
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 338

Authorizing the printing as a House document of a collection of memorial

tributes made in honor of the late Gerald Solomon.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 5, 2002

Mr. NEY (for himself, Mr. DREIER, Mr. REYNOLDS, and Mr. MCINNIS) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

MARCH 5, 2002

Committee on House Administration discharged; considered upon suspension

of the rules and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the printing as a House document of a collection

of memorial tributes made in honor of the late Gerald

Solomon.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING PRINTING OF COLLECTION OF

4 STATEMENTS IN TRIBUTE TO GERALD SOL5 OMON.

6 A collection of statements made in tribute to the late

7 Gerald Solomon, together with related materials, shall be
2

•HCON 338 ATH

1 printed as a House document under the direction of the

2 Joint Committee on Printing, with illustrations and suit3 able binding.

4 SEC. 2. NUMBER OF COPIES.

5 The number of copies of the document printed under

6 section 1 shall be the lesser of—

7 (1) 114 casebound copies, of which 50 copies

8 shall be provided to the family of the late Gerald

9 Solomon, 1 copy shall be provided to each Senator

10 from the State of New York, and 2 copies shall be

11 provided to each Member of the House of Represent12 atives from the State of New York; or

13 (2) such number of casebound copies as does

14 not exceed a total production and printing cost of

15 $25,525, with distribution to be allocated in the

16 same proportion as described in paragraph (1).

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

KADIR MCCOY,

Defendant Below–

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below–

Appellee.

§

§ No. 221, 2019

§

§

§

§ Court Below–Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID 1501018069 (N)

§ 

§

Submitted: June 24, 2019

 Decided: June 25, 2019

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Rule to Show Cause and the appellant’s response, 

it appears to the Court that:

(1) On May 21, 2019, Kadir McCoy filed a notice purporting to appeal 

from an order of the Superior Court dated May 8, 2019. McCoy did not attach a 

copy of the order from which he filed the appeal. After a review of the Superior 

Court docket revealed that no final order had been entered on May 8, 2019, the Clerk 

of the Court issued a notice to McCoy to show cause why this appeal should not be 

dismissed.

(2) On June 24, 2019, in response to the notice to show cause, McCoy filed 

a letter with the Court arguing his appeal should not be dismissed because a court of 
2

law has not considered the merits of his motion for postconviction relief. McCoy’s 

filing is unresponsive to the Court’s notice to show cause. A review of the Superior 

Court docket further reveals that McCoy’s motion for postconviction relief filed on 

January 17, 2019, remains pending in the Superior Court. If the Superior Court 

denies McCoy’s motion for postconviction relief, he may then appeal to this Court 

for a review of that final judgment.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court 

Rule 26(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Series 25-2004 (B) L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Matthew A.
      JonesName:
            Matthew
      A. JonesTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            August
      12, 2008
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Series 25-2004 (B) L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Freddie M.
      KotekName:
            Freddie
      M. KotekTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            May
      14, 2009
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-20-00125-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 141st District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 141-316537-20

Before Gabriel, Kerr, and Birdwell, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

M.M. AND M.M, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF L.M., A MINOR,

Appellants

V.

PROVIDENTIAL LAND DEVELOPMENT, LP D/B/A BREATHLESS HOMES, 

Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered Appellants’ unopposed motion to dismiss their appeal. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 43.2(f). As agreed to by the parties, we tax costs against the party incurring 

same. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: September 3, 2020
## Meeting 

## Between EPA and 

## Zeneca Regarding Petitionto 

## Remove Paraquat Dichloride 

## from EPCRA 302 

## EHS List 

## December 

## 15,1999 I. INTRODUCTION: Heather 

### Winett, Sr. Environmental Counsel, Zeneca Ag Products A. Purpose

### ofMeeting 

### B. Background 

### on Zeneca's Paraquat

### Products 11. TECHNICAL 

### PRESENTATION: Dr. Richard Reiss, 

### Jellinek Schwartz & Connolly 

### A.. Physical and Chemical Properties 

### ofParaquatDichloride B. Chronology and Basis of

### EHS Listing 

### C. Determination

### ofThreshold 

### Planning Quantity 

### (TPQ) 111. LEGAL BASIS 

### FOR REVERSING 

### EPA DENIAL OF DELISTING PETITION: Peter Gray, Esq., 

### McKenna & Cuneo IV. DISCUSSION: All A. Open Questions 

### (see Attachment) 

### B. Path ForwardATTACHMENT 

### Meeting Between 

### EPA and Zeneca Regarding 

### Petition to 

### Remove 

### Paraquat Dichloride 

### from 

### EPCRA 

## 8 302 

### EHS 

### List December 15,1999 OPEN 

### OUESTIONS 1. 

### Did EPA 

### assign a V factor of 1

### (i.e., a complete release) for 

### all solids 

### in solution? 2. 

### Is so, what 

### was the 

### basis for this 

### decision? 3. Is 

### there any docurnentation

### available 

### explaining EPA'sbasis far 

### establishing aV 

### factor for solids in solution? 4. In its guidance on setting TPQs, EPA statedthat solids in solution

### behave 

### like liquids. 

### Ifthis statement is correct, how did EPA address this behavior in assigningV factors for solids in solution? 5. How did 

### EPA address application of

### the volatilization criterion to organic salts (i.e.,organic substances 

### that dissociate in solution) 

### like paraquat? 6. EPA 

### assigned a lowerV factor forliquids that are Iess volatile. How did 

### EPA assign a 

### V factor for solids in solution with no measurable vaporpressure?
No. 07-14-00435-CV

Ashley Denham as Parent and Legal

Guardian of F.L.J.B., a Minor Child,

 Appellant

v.

Texas Mutual Insurance Company,

 Appellee

§

§

§

§

From the 47th District Court

 of Potter County

July 15, 2015

Opinion by Justice Hancock

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated July 15, 2015, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended for which

let execution issue.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

FILE COPY
IV 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 475

Recognizing and celebrating the origin and purposes of Constitution Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2002

Mr. SMITH of Texas (for himself and Mr. CHABOT) submitted the following 

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and celebrating the origin and purposes of 

Constitution Week.

Whereas September 17th marks the anniversary of the signing of the United States Constitution; 

Whereas this date was designated as Constitution Day until 

1952 when Congress changed the name of that date to 

Citizenship Day; 

Whereas the National Society Daughters of the American 

Revolution felt this change of emphasis away from the 

Constitution was not warranted, and in 1953 they passed 

a resolution asking Congress to restore Constitution Day; 

Whereas in 1955 Daughters of the American Revolution 

President General Gertrude Carraway met with then Vice 

President Richard Nixon and Senators Lyndon Johnson 
2

•HCON 475 IH 

and William Knowland and presented the case for a Constitution Week; 

Whereas Senator Knowland introduced a resolution requesting and authorizing President Eisenhower to proclaim 

September 17–23 as Constitution Week; 

Whereas the resolution was passed by Congress, and President Eisenhower issued a proclamation for Constitution 

Week but was reluctant to establish it as an annual celebration; 

Whereas at the urging of the Daughters of the American 

Revolution, Senator Knowland introduced a joint resolution on January 5, 1956, urging the President to annually designate September 17–23 as Constitution Week; 

Whereas this resolution was adopted and signed into law on 

August 2, 1956; 

Whereas thus conceived and instituted, Constitution Week is 

now an annual event commemorating and celebrating the 

Constitution; and 

Whereas President George W. Bush stated, ‘‘We each should 

serve our Nation by actively supporting and shaping our 

Government’s institutions, by working together to build 

strong communities, and by loving our neighbors . . . 

doing this will ensure that the American dream will become real for every willing citizen, and, in fulfilling this 

call together, we will honor the spirit of our powerful and 

enduring Constitution’’: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress recognizes and celebrates the 

3 origin and purposes of Constitution Week.

Æ
B .d.-:J: !>-. r1 gecrest�  1720 W. Rio Salado Parkway - Tempe, AZ. - 85281 (602) 852-66001  Bridgecrest Credit Company  OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE  The undersigned hereby certifies that he is a duly authorized officer of Bridgecrest Credit  Company (the "Servicer"), and that as such he is authorized to execute and deliver this certificate  in the name and on behalf of Bridgecrest Credit Company, and certifies that:  1. I have reviewed the activities of the Servicer during the period May 25, 2022 through December 31, 2022 and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement; and 2. to the best of my knowledge, based on such review and other than described herein, the Servicer has substantially fulfilled all its obligations under the Servicing Agreement for the above referenced period. This certificate is delivered in accordance with Section 2.9 of the Carvana Auto Receivables 2022- P2 Servicing Agreement dated as of May 25, 2022, among Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022- P2, Computershare Trust Company, National Association and Bridgecrest Credit Company. This  certificate is dated as of December 31, 2022.  Daniel Gaudreau  Chief Financial Officer  By:  /s/ Daniel Gaudreau Exhibit 35.1
[Nos. 36325-5-I; 36326-3-I.

Division One.

July 8, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Terry Lee Davis, *Appellant.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-1-01563-6, Arthur E. Piehler, J., entered March 27, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
[No. 17178-3-II.

Division Two.

July 5, 1996.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*James Michael Mankin, *Appellant,*and Kristina May Mankin, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grays Harbor County, No. 92-3-00090-3, Gordon Godfrey, J., entered May 3, 1993. *Reversed in part*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, A.C.J., concurred in by Bridgewa-ter and Armstrong, JJ.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Shengtai Pharmaceutical, Inc., the
“Company,” on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the “Report,” I, Hu
Ye, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      November 16, 2010
                /s/ Hu YeHu
      YeTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 31.3

CERTIFICATION



I, Janelle Anderson, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on
Form 10-K/A of Fresh Vine Wine, Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: May 2, 2022 | /s/ Janelle Anderson                                 
|----------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|                  | Janelle Anderson                                     
|                  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:/s/ John EmeryJohn EmeryChief Executive Officer and Director (PrincipalExecutive Officer)
- BMVIT -IV/L1 (Strategie und Internationales) • Postanschrift Postfach 201 , 1000 Wien Büroanschrift Radetzkystraße 2 , 1030 Wien E-Mail : 11 @bmvit.gv.at Internet: www.bmvit. gv.at (Antwort bitte unter Anführung der GZ . an die oben angeführte E-Mail-Adresse) GZ. BMVIT-40.005/0002-IV/L1/2015 DVR:0000175 Office ofthe Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs U.S . Department of Transportation 400 7th Street, S.W . Room 6402 Washington, DC 20590 Pau l. gretch@dot.gov

Dear Mr. Gretch , 

# b

With reference to the intentions ofthe Austrian designated carier Global Jet Austria Gm H (Note Verbal of the Embassy of Austria dated 13th of November 2006) according to the provis ons of the bilateral air services agreement (Air Services Agreement between the Austrian Federal Government and the Government of the United States of America , done at Vienna on 1 th of March 1989, as amended) to conduct on-scheduled (charter) air services to/from the U ited States based on fifth , sixth or seventh freedom traffic rights and referring to the designat on ofthe said airline the Austrian Civil Aviation Authority hereby confirms that similar requests su mitted by the U.S. carrierswill be treated on the basis of reciprocity. Sincerely Yours

Antonia Hatler Director, Air Transport Affairs Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology Civil Aviation Authority