alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 79

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington

Soap Box Derby.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 22, 2001

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. WOLF, Mr. WYNN, Mrs.

MORELLA, and Ms. NORTON) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater

Washington Soap Box Derby.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES

4 ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

5 The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Associa6 tion (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Association’’)

7 shall be permitted to sponsor a public event, soap box

8 derby races, on the Capitol Grounds on June 23, 2001,

9 or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of Rep-
2

•HCON 79 IH

1 resentatives and the Committee on Rules and Administra2 tion of the Senate may jointly designate.

3 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

4 The event to be carried out under this resolution shall

5 be free of admission charge to the public and arranged

6 not to interfere with the needs of Congress, under condi7 tions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and

8 the Capitol Police Board; except that the Association shall

9 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities

10 incident to all activities associated with the event.

11 SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

12 For the purposes of this resolution, the Association

13 is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds, subject

14 to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, such stage,

15 sound amplification devices, and other related structures

16 and equipment as may be required for the event to be car17 ried out under this resolution.

18 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

19 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police

20 Board are authorized to make any such additional ar21 rangements that may be required to carry out the event

22 under this resolution.

23 SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

24 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce25 ment of the restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act
3

•HCON 79 IH

1 of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), con2 cerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations

3 on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions appli4 cable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event

5 to be carried out under this resolution.

Æ
Exhibit 35.1

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the “Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer” and “Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of November 24, 2021 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2021-4 Owner Trust, as follows:

(i) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2023, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.


(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 15th day of May, 2023.



| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                   
| | Paul C. Honda                                       
| | Vice President and Assistant Secretary              
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)







---
#### PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Complainant, v. F. Owen KENDRICK, Attorney-Respondent.

No. 80SA291.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Nov. 10, 1980.

Robert B. Kane, Denver, for complainant.

No appearance for attorney-respondent.

HODGES, Chief Justice.

For conduct which is in violation of the highest standards of honesty, justice and morality as proscribed for the legal profession in C.R.C.P. 241 B, attorney-respondent *66F. Owen Kendrick is suspended from the practice of law and shall not be eligible to apply for reinstatement until after the expiration of a period of three years. This respondent has previously been privately censured by this court for improper conduct.

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado on October 21, 1976. In September 1978, he was employed as the managing attorney of the Colorado Springs office of “The Legal Clinic of- Sarney, Trattler & Waitkus.” Approximately six months thereafter, the legal clinic filed a formal complaint with the Supreme Court Grievance Committee alleging that the respondent attorney had diverted funds of the legal clinic to his own use without authorization. The respondent failed to answer or plead to the complaint in any manner, nor did he appear at the hearing. Notice of the time, date, and place of the hearing was duly and properly served upon the respondent and in addition, he was personally advised of the hearing by the disciplinary prosecutor of the Grievance Committee.

After hearing, the Grievance Committee found that on the basis of clear and convincing evidence, the allegations of the complaint were established. Specifically, it was found that the respondent signed and negotiated checks drawn upon the account of the legal clinic in the sum of $2,197.60, and that each check constituted an unauthorized appropriation to the respondent of the funds of the legal clinic.

The respondent’s conduct with respect to the funds under his supervision and control while employed as the managing attorney of the legal clinic is reprehensible and clearly in violation of DR1-102(A)(4) of the canons of professional responsibility. This provision provides that “a lawyer shall not ... engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.” The respondent’s failure to answer the complaint and his failure to appear at the hearing on the merits of the complaint, serves to aggravate the respondent’s violations because it is a further demonstration of his complete lack of responsibility toward his obligations as a lawyer.

We adopt the recommendations of the Grievance Committee and hereby order that this respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Colorado, and that he shall not be eligible to apply for reinstatement until after the expiration of a period of three years.

Also, the respondent is ordered to make restitution in the amount of $2,197.60 to the legal clinic within thirty (30) days.

Costs in the sum of $435.04 are assessed against this respondent, and he is ordered to pay this amount to the Clerk of the Supreme Court within ninety (90) days.
[No. 35727-1-I.

Division One.

June 17, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Robert Tappan, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Sno-homish County, No. 93-1-01713-2, James H. Allendoerfer, J., entered December 1, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

135877 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

v SC: 135877 COA: 282035 Calhoun CC: 06-003319-FH KAREN MOYE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0519 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2008

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 603 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 603

       Designating September 2018 as ``School Bus Safety Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2018

   Mrs. Fischer (for herself and Mr. Peters) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                           September 6, 2018

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Designating September 2018 as ``School Bus Safety Month''.

Whereas, every school day in the United States, approximately 500,000 public and 
        private school buses carry more than 26,000,000 children to and from 
        school;
Whereas school buses comprise the largest mass transportation fleet in the 
        United States;
Whereas 55 percent of all K-12 students ride a school bus, totaling 260,000,000 
        miles for each of the 180 school days in a year, or 46,800,000,000 miles 
        driven annually;
Whereas the Child Safety Network, celebrating 29 years of national public 
        service, supports the CSN Safe Bus campaign, which is designed to 
        provide the latest technology and free safety and security resources to 
        the school bus industry;
Whereas the designation of School Bus Safety Month will allow broadcast and 
        digital media and social networking industries to make commitments to 
        disseminate public service announcements that are produced in order--

    (1) to provide resources designed to safeguard children; and

    (2) to recognize school bus drivers and professionals;

Whereas key leaders who are deserving of recognition during School Bus Safety 
        Month and beyond have provided security awareness training materials to 
        more than 14,000 public and private school districts, trained more than 
        100,000 school bus operators, and provided more than 110,000 
        counterterrorism guides to individuals who are key to providing both 
        safety and security for children in the United States; and
Whereas School Bus Safety Month offers the Senate and the people of the United 
        States an opportunity to recognize and thank all of the school bus 
        drivers in the United States and the professionals who are focused on 
        school bus safety and security: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates September 2018 as ``School Bus 
Safety Month''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULES 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Catherine Kwok, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Generation Asia I Acquisition Limited;




2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




Date: March 30, 2022                                                                           By:/s/ Catherine Kwok.

Name: Catherine Kwok

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





---
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-18-00063-CV

____________________

DANIEL D. CLAYTON, CITY OF BEAUMONT, BECKY AMES, JOSEPH 

MAJDALANI, PAMELA DODSON, AND TROY DODSON, Appellants

V.

OLDCASTLE MATERIALS TEXAS, INC., Appellee

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 172nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. E-200,934

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

The City of Beaumont,

1 Mayor Becky Ames, and Dr. Joseph Majdalani, filed 

an agreed motion to dismiss their accelerated appeal from the denial of their motion 

to dismiss under the Texas Citizens Participation Act. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. 

Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(12) (West Supp. 2017). Additionally, they request that the 

 

1 The City of Beaumont filed a notice of appeal that included its unidentified 

employees, unidentified agents or unidentified representatives, and certain 

unidentified personnel.
2

stay of all proceedings in the trial court be lifted as to the City of Beaumont, Mayor 

Becky Ames, and Dr. Joseph Madjalani, so that the trial court may sever and dismiss 

the action against them in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. See id.

§ 51.014(b). No objection has been filed. 

We grant the motion and dismiss the accelerated appeal of the City of 

Beaumont, Mayor Becky Ames, and Dr. Joseph Majdalani. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1(a)(1). The stay of all trial court proceedings is lifted as to the City of Beaumont, 

Mayor Becky Ames, and Dr. Joseph Majdalani. The accelerated appeal shall 

continue as to the remaining appellants, Daniel D. Clayton, Pamela Dodson d/b/a 

L.D. Construction, and Troy Dodson. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(b). The style of the 

appeal is modified to Daniel D. Clayton, Pamela Dodson, and Troy Dodson v. 

Oldcastle Materials Texas, Inc.

APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

 PER CURIAM

 

 

Submitted on May 31, 2018

Opinion Delivered August 30, 2018

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6912

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KEITH DARNELL MCNEILL, a/k/a No Doubt,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,

Senior District Judge. (4:08-cr-00012-HCM-FBS-1; 4:11-cv-00096-

HCM)

Submitted: December 20, 2011 Decided: December 22, 2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Darnell McNeill, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward 

Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Keith Darnell McNeill seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 

(West Supp. 2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

McNeill has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00870-CR

EX PARTE JUAN GABRIEL CISNEROS

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Brooks County, Texas

Trial Court No. 88-02-02179-CR

Honorable Marisela Saldana, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 8, 2012

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

The trial court denied appellant’s application for writ of habeas corpus on July 25, 2011. 

The notice of appeal was due to be filed August 24, 2011. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion 

for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on September 8, 2011. TEX. R. APP. P. 

26.3. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on October 21, 2011 and he did not file a motion for 

extension of time. Accordingly, on December 28, 2011, this court ordered appellant to show 

cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. On January 23, 

2012, appellant responded by stating a request for findings of fact were filed by his attorney on 

August 9, 2011 and, following a September 23, 2011 hearing, the trial court stated it would file 

findings but failed to do so.
04-11-00870-CR

- 2 -

The time in which to file a notice of appeal in a civil appeal may be extended by the 

timely filing of a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. See TEX. R. APP. P.

26.1(a)(4). However, in a criminal appeal, only the filing of a motion for new trial will extend a 

defendant’s time in which to file a notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(2). Therefore, 

appellant’s request that the trial court enter findings of fact did not extend the deadline by which 

he was required to file his notice of appeal. 

Accordingly, we must dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 355

Congratulating Hadassah, the Women’s Zionist Organization of America,

on its 90th anniversary and wishing the organization continued success

in its efforts on behalf of all people.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 18, 2002

Mr. FERGUSON submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Congratulating Hadassah, the Women’s Zionist Organization

of America, on its 90th anniversary and wishing the

organization continued success in its efforts on behalf

of all people.

Whereas Hadassah, the Women’s Zionist Organization of

America, is the largest Zionist organization, the largest

Jewish organization, and the largest women’s membership organization in the Nation;

Whereas Hadassah was founded in 1912 by Henrietta Szold

to help meet medical needs in what was then Palestine;

Whereas Hadassah has been a leading force in meeting the

medical needs of Israel through Mt. Scopus Hospital, Ein

Karem Hospital, and various clinics in Israel;
2

•HCON 355 IH

Whereas Hadassah hospitals, in addition to serving as a

model of peaceful coexistence in the Middle East, provide

state-of-the-art healthcare to 600,000 patients each year

regardless of race, religion, creed, or national origin, and

often treat the most critically wounded in that region’s

ongoing conflicts;

Whereas Hadassah has been critical in upgrading the educational and learning opportunities of the people of Israel

through the College of Technology, through the Career

Counseling Institute, and through Youth Villages, which

serve at-risk youth, and in the United States through

Young Judea and the Hadassah Leadership Academy;

and

Whereas in the United States, Hadassah has been actively

engaged in health education programs on breast cancer

and osteoporosis, voter registration efforts, Jewish education, grassroots advocacy to improve the relations of

the United States and Israel, Jewish communal concerns,

humanitarian relief to distressed communities, and volunteer work in literacy programs and at domestic violence

shelters: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress congratulates Hadassah,

3 the Women’s Zionist Organization of America, on its 90th

4 anniversary and wishes the organization continued success

5 in its efforts on behalf of all people.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ Matthew A. JonesName:
    
    Matthew A. JonesTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
    
    May 17, 2010