alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The
undersigned, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Shengtai
Pharmaceutical, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify under the standards
set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Date:
      November 15, 2009
              
              /s/
      Qingtai LiuQingtai
      LiuTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer
NO. 12-18-00321-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

BARBARA LYNN ORPINEDA, 

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 114TH 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Barbara Lynn Orpineda filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by 

Appellant and her counsel. No decision has been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly, 

Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

Opinion delivered November 28, 2018.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

NOVEMBER 28, 2018

NO. 12-18-00321-CR

BARBARA LYNN ORPINEDA,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the 114th District Court 

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 114-0656-18)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss 

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and 

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and 

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-60670

Summary Calendar

MARIA CRISTINA ALVAREZ

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H HOLDER, JR, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A95 813 735

Before KING, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Maria Cristina Alvarez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing her appeal

from the denial of her application for cancellation of removal for certain

nonpermanent residents and adjustment of status and from the BIA’s order

denying her motion for reconsideration. Alvarez argues that the immigration

judge erred by denying her application for cancellation of removal because her

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 2, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-60670

2

removal would impose an exceptional and extremely undue hardship on her

United States-born, minor children. The Government argues that this court

lacks jurisdiction over the BIA’s order dismissing Alvarez’s appeal because she

failed to file a timely petition for review from that decision. The Government

further argues that Alvarez has waived any challenge to the denial of her motion

for reconsideration by failing to brief the issue.

Alvarez did not file a timely petition for review of the BIA’s April 23, 2008

order dismissing her appeal. See Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 394-95 (1995);

Guevara v. Gonzales, 450 F.3d 173, 176 (5th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, this court

lacks jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision dismissing her appeal. 

Although Alvarez’s petition for review of the BIA’s denial of her motion for

reconsideration is timely filed, she raises no issue with respect to the BIA’s

denial of her motion for reconsideration. Issues that are not briefed are waived.

See Thuri v. Ashcroft, 380 F.3d 788, 793 (5th Cir. 2004). 

For the foregoing reasons, Alvarez’s petition for review is DENIED in part

and DISMISSED in part.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of IASIS Healthcare LLC (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                             /s/ David R. White
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             David R. White
                                             Chairman of the Board
                                             and Chief Executive Officer

                                             /s/ W. Carl Whitmer
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             W. Carl Whitmer
                                             Chief Financial Officer

Dated: February 10, 2005
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-441-CR

EZEQUIEL TREJO MORALES	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 158TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Ezequiel Trejo Morales, pro se, appeals from the denial of his motion for DNA testing.  The trial court entered its order denying his motion for DNA testing on September 7, 2006.2  Therefore, Morales’s notice of appeal was due on October 9, 2006, but was not filed until December 11, 2006.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).

	On December 22, 2006, we sent Morales a letter explaining our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over his appeal.  Our letter stated that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed on or before January 2, 2007, a response showing grounds for continuation of the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3.  We have received no response.

	The rules of appellate procedure set out rules that must be followed to invoke this court’s jurisdiction over an appeal.  White v. State, 61 S.W.3d 424, 428-29 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001).  If the jurisdiction of a court of appeals is not properly invoked, the power of the appellate court to act is as absent as if it did not exist.  Id.  Appellate jurisdiction is invoked by giving timely and proper notice of appeal.  Id. 

	Here, Morales did not give timely notice of appeal; thus, we do not have jurisdiction over his appeal.  Absent appellate jurisdiction, we can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal.  See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523, 525 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	WALKER, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: February 1, 2007
##### 



| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | 

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alan Lipton, Chief Executive Officer of Odimo Incorporated (the Company) in compliance
with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that:



| |  | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  | the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.                                                      

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of
May 13, 2005.

| |                                       |  |  | 
| | ------------------------------------- |  |  | 
| |                                       | 
| | /s/ Alan Lipton                       | 
| | Alan Lipton                           | 
| | President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
Odimo Incorporated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
[No. 13997-2-III.

Division Three.

July 16, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. James Foy Daley, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pend Oreille County, No. 92-1-00071-0, Fred L. Stewart, J., entered March 24, 1994. *Remanded*by unpublished opinion per Munson, J., concurred in by Schultheis, A.C.J., and Thompson, J.
ORDER TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 20 - 0067

DIANE WENGER,

Petitioner and Appellant, vs. STATE FARM MUTAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Respondent and Appellee. **ORDER TO SUPPLEMENT**  **RECORD (TRIAL EXHIBITS)**
Based upon Appellant’s Unopposed Motion fo r Order to Supplement Record (Trial Exhibits), and GOOD CAUSE appearing, it is hereby ordered that Appellant’s counsel shall email Trial Exhibit 8, pages 874 to 877, to Darlene Gallagher at the Clerk of the Supre me Court, with cc: to Appellee’s counsel , and that the exhibit shall be printed and lodged at the appropriate spot in the binder of trial exhibit s trans mit ted from the district court .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 25 2020

06/25/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0067
|        | (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                            |

|  | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 17, 2010 | /s/      Qingtai Liu                |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                    | Qingtai      Liu                    |
|                    | Title:      Chief Executive Officer |
|                    | (Principal      ExecutiveOfficer)   |

----
# BId Array

# Capacity Utilization
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8494]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Availability of Funds and Solicitation for Grant 
Applications for Women in Apprenticeship and Nontraditional Occupations 
(WANTO); Funding Opportunity Number: SGA/DFA PY-11-10

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor Department.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Through this notice, the U.S. Department of Labor Employment 
and Training Administration (ETA), announces the availability of 
approximately $1,800,000 in grant funds authorized under the WANTO Act 
of 1992 to award six consortia made up of a community-based 
organization (CBO), a Local Workforce Investment Area (LWIA) 
established under the Workforce Investment Act and a registered 
apprenticeship program (RAP) sponsor. Each consortium will conduct 
innovative projects to improve outreach, recruitment, hiring, training, 
employment, and retention of women in apprenticeships in the 
nontraditional occupations. Each consortium must consist of a minimum 
of three components: (1) A CBO (which may be a faith-based 
organization) that has demonstrated experience in providing women with 
job-training services; (2) a LWIA (which includes a representative of 
the local government responsible for administering workforce programs 
under WIA or Workforce Investment Board); and (3) a RAP sponsor (which 
can be an individual employer, association of employers, or an 
apprenticeship committee which includes joint and non-joint committees 
designated by the sponsor to administer and operate an apprenticeship 
program and in whose name the apprenticeship program is registered or 
approved). It is anticipated that awards will be in the amount of up to 
$300,000 over the two-year grant period.

DATES: The closing date for receipt of applications is May 21, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: L. Gerald Tate, Grants Management 
Specialist, Office of Grants Management, at (202) 693-3703.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Grant Officer for this SGA is Latifa 
Jeter.
    The complete SGA and any subsequent SGA amendments, in connection 
with this solicitation are described in further detail on ETA's Web 
site at http://www.doleta.gov/grants/ or on http://www.grants.gov. The 
Web sites provide application information, eligibility requirements, 
review and selection procedures and other program requirements 
governing this solicitation.

    Signed April 3, 2012 in Washington, DC.
Donna Kelly,
Grant Officer, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-8494 Filed 4-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 10880 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. ISRAEL ANDRADE

- FAVELA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:15

- CR

- 46

- 1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Israel Andrade

- Favela pleaded guilty to illegal reentry . The district court departed above the guidelines range of 21 to 27 months and sentenced him to 72 months of imprisonment to run consecutively to a 45

- year state sentence and a 24

- month revocation sentence. He challenges the substantiv e reasonableness of his sentence.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 30, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-10880 Document: 00514011798 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/30/2017No. 16

- 10880

2 We assume that Andrade

- Favela preserved his challenge to the reasonableness of the upward departure. The district court’s decision to depart on the basis of Andrade

- Favela’s history of repeated illegal entries and the

se rious nature of his state conviction advance s the objectives of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2) and is justified by the facts of the case. T he extent of the departure is further justified by Andrade

- Favela’s state conviction and the deference owed to the district court

. Thus, Andrade

- Favela fails to show that the district court abused its discretion in departing. See United States v. Zuniga

- Peralta , 442 F .3d 345, 34 6

- 48 (5th Cir. 2006); United States v. Saldana , 427 F.3d 298, 3 09

- 16 (5th Cir. 2005). Andrade

- Favela did not preserve his challenge to the reasonableness of the consecutive sentence. T he consecutive nature of the sentence was authorized by statute and the Sentencing Guidelines. See 18 U.S.C. § 3584(a); U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3( d ) & comment. (n.4( A), (C))

. He fails to show that the district court erred, much less plainly erred, in imposing a consecutive sentence , particularly in light of the deference owed to the district court

. See Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009) ; United State s v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 736 (1993) ; United States v. Campos

- Maldonado , 531 F.3d 337, 339 (5th Cir. 2008) ; United States v. Candia , 454 F.3d 468, 472

- 73 (5th Cir. 2006). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 16-10880 Document: 00514011798 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/30/2017
391 A.2d 690

#### Commonwealth v. McGee, Appellant.

Submitted June 13, 1977.

Edward D. Ohlbaum, Assistant Defender, and Benjamin Lemer, Defender, for appellant; Steven H. Goldblatt, Deputy District Attorney, and F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Order affirmed and case remanded for trial.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0232 SAT Date: 2/1/2013 Print Date: 3/4/2013

Related cases : Health related cases : Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 1

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 1 1 PMN 3 1 1 Hyd Pdt

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ; Hyd Pdt negl Keywords : Keywords: SENS-S,L; IRR-MM,L; MUTA Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0232 FATE: Solid S = Reacts Hydrolysis half-life = hr-da VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = PMN 90-99 via hydrolysis; then Hyd Pdt 90 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > moSorption to soils/sediments = v.strong PBT Potential: PMN P1B1; Hyd Pdt P3B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is nil all routes as the neat material ( p che m ); p oor all routes for the if in solution (analog). Concern for mutagenicity based on respiratory and dermal sensitization and lung and mucous membrane irritation based on the isocyanate moiety for the low molecular weight fractions.

Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 * fish

_ chronic value * daphnid

_ chronic value *
algal

_ chronic value *
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic polymers; ecotox chemical class: p olyme r -nonionic- N CO; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; 100% active ingredients; mean measured concentrations; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) *

SARs nonionic polymers SAR Class p olyme r -nonionic- N CO Ecotox Category N onionic Polymers
Ecotox Factors Comments:
SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:/s/ James A. CalderJames A. CalderChief Financial Officer and Director(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
  39
Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Benchmark 2021-B31 Mortgage Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2.	Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.	Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4.	Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and


5.	All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; KeyBank National Association; Situs Holdings, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Computershare Trust Company, National Association; Situs Holdings, LLC; and Wilmington Trust, National Association.

Date:	March 30, 2023

/s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)



Benchmark 2021-B31 Certifications

---
TS-EMLA40 

Attachment #4

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 1d 

Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical Substances at 

Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter 
TS-EMLA40 
Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical 

Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter – Manufacture 

of Adhesion Promoters (LAS) and Emulsifiers
Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical 

Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter – Processing of Emulsifiers
#### Davidson, Appellee, *v.*Hough et al., Appellants.

(No. 31563

Decided November 24, 1948.)

*Messrs. Oviatt £ Oviatt,*for appellee.

*Messrs. Woodle £ Wachtel,*for appellants.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.