This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains documents other than rules or

proposed rules that are applicable to the

public. Notices of hearings and investigations,

committee meetings, agency decisions and

rulings, delegations of authority, filing of

petitions and applications and agency

statements of organization and functions are

examples of documents appearing in this

section.

Notices Federal Register

23658 

Vol. 77, No. 77 

Friday, April 20, 2012 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Forest Service 

Six Rivers National Forest, Gasquet 

Ranger District, California, The Smith 

River National Recreation Area 

Restoration and Motorized Travel 

Management Project 

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. 

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an 

environmental impact statement. 

SUMMARY: The Six Rivers National 

Forest proposes to make limited changes 

to the National Forest Transportation 

System (NFTS) on the Gasquet Ranger 

District in order to: provide motorized 

access to dispersed recreation 

opportunities; provide a diversity of 

motorized recreation opportunities; to 

provide for administrative needs, and; 

to reduce ecological and cultural 

resource risk and maintenance costs. In 

addition, inventoried unauthorized 

routes (UAR) that pose a risk to 

ecological resources will be restored to 

reduce risk to resources. 

This project responds to the Travel 

Management Rule, Subpart B (36 CFR 

212.52), which requires the public be 

allowed to participate in the revision of 

designations, and 36 CFR 212.54, which 

requires the Forest to coordinate with 

other government organizations in the 

revision of designation of the NFTS. 

Changes to the NFTS resulting from this 

project will be reflected in an updated 

Motor Vehicle Use Map. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before June 4, 2012. The draft 

environmental impact statement is 

expected in October 2012 and the final 

environmental impact statement is 

expected in March 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to 

Six Rivers National Forest, Supervisor’s 

Office, 1330 Bayshore Way, Eureka, CA 

95501. Comments may also be sent via 

facsimile to 707–441–3502, or via email 

to comments-pacificsouthwest-sixrivers@fs.fed.us. Please insure that 

‘‘Smith River NRA Restoration and 

Motorized Travel Management’’ occurs 

in the subject line. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christy Prescott, Team Leader. Phone: 

707–442–1721, Email: commentspacificsouthwest-sixrivers@fs.fed.us.Individuals who use 

telecommunication devices for the deaf 

(TDD) may call the Federal Information 

Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 

between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern 

Time, Monday through Friday. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Purpose and Need for Action 

The purpose of the project is to make 

limited changes to the NFTS that 

enhance motorized recreation 

opportunities, dispersed recreation 

opportunities, and administrative 

access, while minimizing ecological and 

cultural resource risk. In addition, this 

project restores terrestrial and aquatic 

habitats impacted by unauthorized 

routes. 

Proposed Action 

The Six Rivers National Forest 

proposes to make limited changes to the 

National Forest Transportation System 

(NFTS) in order to: provide motorized 

access to dispersed recreation 

opportunities (camping, hunting, 

fishing, hiking, horseback riding, etc.); 

provide a diversity of motorized 

recreation opportunities; to provide for 

administrative needs, and; to reduce 

ecological and cultural resource risk and 

maintenance costs. In addition, 

inventoried unauthorized routes (UAR) 

that pose a risk to ecological resources 

will be restored to reduce risk to 

resources. 

The Six Rivers National Forest (SRNF) 

proposes the following actions: 1)The 

addition of 28 unauthorized routes as 

roads, totaling 16 miles, to the current 

National Forest Transportation System 

(NFTS); 2) The addition of 45 

unauthorized routes as motorized trails 

to the NFTS, totaling 44 miles; 3) The 

seasonal gate closure on 2 roads and 5 

motorized trails, totaling 13 miles; 4) 

The mixed-use of 1 road (17N49), 

totaling 4 miles; 5) The 

decommissioning of 118 NFTS roads, 

totaling 57 miles, and; 6) The restoration 

of 173 UARs totaling 80 miles. 

The project encompasses the Smith 

River NRA and Gasquet Ranger District, 

exclusive of lands within 

congressionally designated Wilderness 

Areas, and is referred to collectively as 

the Smith River NRA. This decision will 

result in an update to the Motor Vehicle 

Use Map. 

State, County, and Smith River NRA 

OML 3, 4, and 5 roads are all main 

access roads on the NRA that 

accommodate passenger cars, and are 

not being considered in this analysis, 

with the exception of 17N49 which is an 

OML 3 road that is being proposed for 

mixed-use. Also not considered in this 

analysis are roads that were closed 

under previous NEPA decisions. No 

new construction would occur under 

this proposal, meaning lands previously 

undisturbed will not be considered for 

additions to the NFTS as roads or 

motorized trails. 

Responsible Official 

The Forest Supervisor of the Six 

Rivers National Forest is the 

Responsible Official. 

Nature of Decision To Be Made 

The Responsible Official will decide 

whether to adopt and implement the 

proposed action, an alternative to the 

proposed action, or take no action. 

Preliminary Issues 

There are five areas of concern that 

have been identified through a previous 

public scoping effort. The public has 

expressed concern in how the project 

will affect motorized recreation, 

dispersed recreation, and economic 

values associated with travel 

management. Designation of 

unauthorized routes in Inventoried 

Roadless Areas (IRA) has also been 

identified as an issue of public interest 

on this project. There is public concern 

over how the project will affect the 

spread of Port Orford-cedar root disease. 

There is public concern over the 

potential health risks regarding the 

designation of new roads and motorized 

trails that overlay lands that may 

contain Naturally Occuring Asbestos. 

There is public concern regarding the 

projects potential effects on Federally 

listed endangered plant species and 

Forest Service Sensitive plant species. 

Permits or Licenses Required 

Prior to implementation of the 

decision, the Forest will require a 

waiver from the North Coast Regional 

Water Quality Control Board. The 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 77 / Friday, April 20, 2012 / Notices 23659 

1See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 76 

FR 5563 (Feb. 1, 2011) (Initiation Notice). 2See Certain Orange Juice From Brazil, 77 FR 

22343 (Apr. 13, 2012) (ITC Final). 

3See Antidumping Duty Order; Frozen 

Concentrated Orange Juice From Brazil, 52 FR 

16426 (May 5, 1987). 

4The Department preliminarily found that Louis 

Dreyfus Commodities Agroindustrial S.A. (Louis 

Dreyfus) is the successor-in-interest to Coinbra 

Frutesp (SA). See Certain Orange Juice From Brazil: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Preliminary No 

Shipment Determination, 77 FR 21724 (Apr. 11, 

2012). 

5See Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Orange 

Juice from Brazil, 71 FR 12183 (Mar. 9, 2006). 6See Certain Orange Juice From Brazil: Final 

Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 30655 (May 26, 

2011). 7See ITC Final and USITC Publication 4311 

(April 2012), titled Certain Orange Juice from Brazil 

(Inv. No. 731–TA–1089). 

California Highway Patrol must approve 

all mixed-use designations. 

Scoping Process 

This notice of intent initiates the 

scoping process, which guides the 

development of the environmental 

impact statement. A public meeting will 

be held in Crescent City on May 9, 2012 

to discuss the proposed action, and 

answer any questions the public may 

have regarding the project. It is 

important that reviewers provide their 

comments at such times and in such 

manner that they are useful to the 

agency’s preparation of the 

environmental impact statement. 

Therefore, comments should be 

provided prior to the close of the 

comment period and should clearly 

articulate the reviewer’s concerns and 

contentions. Comments received in 

response to this solicitation, including 

names and addresses of those who 

comment, will be part of the public 

record for this proposed action. 

Dated: April 2, 2012. 

Tyrone Kelley, 

Forest Supervisor. 

[FR Doc. 2012–8842 Filed 4–19–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–11–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–351–840] 

Revocation of Antidumping Duty 

Order: Certain Orange Juice From 

Brazil 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On February 1, 2011, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated a sunset review of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

orange juice (OJ) from Brazil.1 On April 

13, 2012, the International Trade 

Commission (ITC) determined that 

revocation of this order would not be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time, pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act).2 Therefore, 

pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(1)(iii), the 

Department is revoking the antidumping 

duty order on OJ from Brazil. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 9, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Eastwood, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 2, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3874. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Scope of the Order 

The scope of the order includes 

certain orange juice for transport and/or 

further manufacturing, produced in two 

different forms: (1) Frozen orange juice 

in a highly concentrated form, 

sometimes referred to as frozen 

concentrated orange juice for 

manufacture (FCOJM); and (2) 

pasteurized single-strength orange juice 

which has not been concentrated, 

referred to as not-from-concentrate 

(NFC). At the time of the filing of the 

petition, there was an existing 

antidumping duty order on frozen 

concentrated orange juice (FCOJ) from 

Brazil.3 Therefore, the scope of the order 

with regard to FCOJM covers only 

FCOJM produced and/or exported by 

those companies which were excluded 

or revoked from the pre-existing 

antidumping order on FCOJ from Brazil 

as of December 27, 2004. Those 

companies are Cargill Citrus Limitada, 

Coinbra Frutesp S.A.,4 Fischer S.A. 

Comercio, Industria, and Agricultura, 

Montecitrus Trading S.A., and 

Sucocitrico Cutrale, S.A. 

Excluded from the scope of the order 

are reconstituted orange juice and 

frozen concentrated orange juice for 

retail (FCOJR). Reconstituted orange 

juice is produced through further 

manufacture of FCOJM, by adding 

water, oils and essences to the orange 

juice concentrate. FCOJR is 

concentrated orange juice, typically at 

42 Brix, in a frozen state, packed in 

retail-sized containers ready for sale to 

consumers. FCOJR, a finished consumer 

product, is produced through further 

manufacture of FCOJM, a bulk 

manufacturer’s product. 

The subject merchandise is currently 

classifiable under subheadings 

2009.11.00, 2009.12.25, 2009.12.45, and 

2009.19.00 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 

These HTSUS subheadings are provided 

for convenience and for customs 

purposes only and are not dispositive. 

Rather, the written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive. 

Background 

On March 9, 2006, the Department 

published in the Federal Register an 

antidumping duty order on OJ from 

Brazil.5

On February 1, 2011, the Department 

initiated, and the ITC instituted, a 

sunset review of the antidumping duty 

order on OJ from Brazil. See Initiation 

Notice. As a result of its sunset review 

of this order, the Department found that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

order would be likely to lead to the 

continuation or recurrence of dumping.6

The Department notified the ITC of the 

magnitude of the margins likely to 

prevail were the antidumping duty 

order to be revoked. 

On April 13, 2012, the ITC 

determined, pursuant to section 751(c) 

of the Act, that revocation of this order 

would not be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States within a reasonably foreseeable 

time.7

Revocation 

As a result of the determination by the 

ITC that revocation of this order is not 

likely to lead to the continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States, the 

Department, pursuant to section 751(d) 

of the Act, is revoking the antidumping 

duty order on OJ from Brazil. Pursuant 

to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the effective date of 

revocation is March 9, 2011 (i.e., the 

fifth anniversary of the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

the antidumping duty order). The 

Department will notify U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection to discontinue 

suspension of liquidation and collection 

of cash deposits on entries of the subject 

merchandise entered or withdrawn from 

warehouse on or after March 9, 2011, 

the effective date of revocation of the 

antidumping duty order. The 

Department will complete any pending 

administrative reviews of this order. 

This revocation and notice are issued 

in accordance with section 751(d)(2) of 

the Act and published pursuant to 

section 777(i)(1) of the Act. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES