alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PCA : 12-3J14-24-B-0226 

PURCHASE AWARD DESCRIPTION 

February 22, 2024 12:45:00 

Wild Rice PCA, 12-3J14-24-B-0226 WBSCM Number 2000009875 

The USDA/Agricultural Marketing Service/Commodity Procurement Program (CPP) hereby announces the award 

of solicitation 12-3J14-24-B-0226 WBSCM Number 2000009875. The following commodities were purchased in 

support of Child Nutrition and other related Domestic Food Distribution Programs. Deliveries are to be 

made from April 01, 2024 through April 15, 2024. 

A total of 15,000 pounds of wild rice was not purchased due to vendor capacity constraints. 

110830 RICE WILD PKG-25/1 LB - 15,000 pounds 

The Contracting Officer will not consider any additional or further offers under solicitation 12-3J14-24-

B-0226 WBSCM Number 2000009875. CPP extends our appreciation to all bidders for showing an interest in 

supplying agricultural commodities for USDA/Domestic Programs. 

Further information can be obtained from the Commodity Procurement Program, Agricultural Marketing 

Service, USDA, South Building, Washington, DC 20250, telephone (202) 720 4517 or the website at http: 

//www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food. 

Number of Offers/Quotes(Vendor Responses) received: 1 

PURCHASE SUMMARY 

Material Total Qty UOM Price Range Total Dollars 

RICE WILD PKG-25/1 LB 60,000.000 LB $25.0000 - $25.0000 $ 

1,500,000.00 

TOTAL 60,000.000 LB $ 1,500,000.00 

PURCHASE DETAILS 

Contractor/ Material Plant Bid Inv. Destination Quantity UOM Price 

Contract Number Location Item 

WHITE EARTH MARKET, 

LLC 

35500 EAGLEVIEW RD 

WHITE EARTH, MN 

56591-7706 

12-3J14-24-C-1120 White Earth, MN 

4100029460 

RICE WILD PKG-25/1 LB 

40 Kansas City, 30,000.000LB $ 

MO 25.0000 

40 Kansas City, 30,000.000LB $ 

MO 25.0000 

Subtotal 60,000.000LB 

Contract Total 60,000.000LB $ 1,500,000.00 

Contractor Total 60,000.000 LB $ 1,500,000.00
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The certification set forth below is being submittedin connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mueller Group, LLC(the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

I, Gregory E.Hyland, the Chief Executive Officer of Mueller Group, LLC, certify that, to thebest of my knowledge:

1.                the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Mueller Group, LLC.
| Date: February 9, 2007 | By:      | /s/ GREGORY E.  HYLAND    |
|-----------------------------|----------|---------------------------|
|                        |     | Gregory E. Hyland         |
|                        | * * | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
Presidential Documents

21387 

Federal Register 

Vol. 77, No. 69 

Tuesday, April 10, 2012 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2012–05 of March 30, 2012 

Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 1245(d)(4)(B) 

And (C) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2012 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary of the Treasury[, 

and] the Secretary of Energy 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States, after carefully considering the report submitted 

to the Congress by the Energy Information Administration on February 29, 

2012, and other relevant information, and given current global economic 

conditions, increased production by certain countries, the level of spare 

capacity, and the existence of strategic reserves, among other factors, I determine, pursuant to section 1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, Pub1ic Law 112–81, that there 

is a sufficient supply of petroleum and petroleum products from countries 

other than Iran to permit a significant reduction in the volume of petroleum 

and petroleum products purchased from Iran by or through foreign financial 

institutions. 

I will closely monitor this situation to assure that the market can continue 

to accommodate a reduction in purchases of petroleum and petroleum products from Iran. 

The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, March 30, 2012 

[FR Doc. 2012–8671 

Filed 4–9–12; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES6OB#1.EPS</GPH>
Jet‐A, LLC

March 30, 2011

Catherine O’Toole

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Docket Number: DOT‐OST‐2010‐0120

Subject: Jet‐A DOT Application  

Reference: DOT Letter November 3, 2010

Dear Ms. O’Toole:

In response to your referenced letter I prepared answers to your questions and have uploaded

revised or more detailed documents to the www.regulations.gov server.   

Response:

GENERAL INFORMATION

1.  ACCIDENT PLAN – Has been uploaded.  

2.  JET‐A DOES NOT INTEND TO OPERATE COVERED FLIGHTS.  TSA SCREENING FOR SELECTEE, NO‐

FLY AND CLEARED LISTS SHALL CONTINUED TO BE PERFORMED AS CURRENTLY DICTATED UNDER

JET‐A's TFSSP (12‐5 SECURITY PROGRAM).

3.  FORM 4523 Uploaded to Server

MANAGEMENT AND KEY TECHNICAL PERSONNEL

1.  MR. BOROS MAINTAINS THE POSITION OF MANAGING DIRECTOR OF JET‐A, LLC AND ACTIVELY

PERFORMS THE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS UNDER AIR CARRIER

CERTIFICATE XQJA013M.  MR. BOROS' NON‐AVIATION BUSINESS INTERESTS AND INVESTMENTS DO

NOT IMPACT WITH HIS RESPONSIBILITIES PERFORMED UNDER FAR 119.71.  MR. BOROS DELEGATES

STAFF TO MAINTAIN HIS OTHER AFFAIRS AND THEREFORE IS ABLE TO DEDICATE ADEQUATE TIME

TO MAINTAIN HIS RESPONSIBILITIES IN RUNNING JET‐A, LLC.

2.  MR. MURRER IS NO LONGER EMPLOYED BY QUEST DIAGNOSTICS.  HE MAINTAINS POSTION AS

CHIEF PILOT FOR JET‐A, LLC.

3.  MR. MURRER HOLDS TYPE RATINGS IN THE CL60, A320 AND DC‐10 AIRCRAFT AND HAS FLOWN

ALL 3‐TYPES AS CAPTAIN IN PART 121 AND PART 135 OPERATIONS.  HE HAS ALSO FLOWN THE

CR700 AND ATR72 AS FIRST OFFICER UNDER PART 121 OPERATIONS.  

4.  UPDATED RESUME FOR JEFFREY BARNES IS ATTACHED.

OWNERSHIP

1.  SHEARSON INTERNATIONAL CORP. OWNS 50% STOCK OF JET‐A, LLC.  THERE IS NO OTHER

RELATIONSHIP OTHER THAN OWNERSHIP.
Jet‐A, LLC

2.  IDM CORPORATE AVIATIONS SERVICES, LLC IS A U.S. REGISTERRED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

OWNED BUY U.S. MEMBERS.

FINANCIAL POSITION AND OPERATION

1.  CURRENT BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT FOR JET‐A, LLC HEREWITH ATTACHED

2.  NOT APPLICABLE.  JET‐A, LLC IS A CHARTER MANAGEMENT COMPANY WHICH MANAGE

AIRCRAFT ON BEHALF OF ITS OWNERS.  FIXED AND VARIABLE COST OF AIRCRAFT OWNERSHIP AND

OPERATION ARE ENTIRELY BORNE BY THE OWNER OF THE AIRCRAFT.

3.  THE BOEING N500VP SHALL BE BASED IN KANSAS CITY – KMCI, AT THE FACILITY OF JET

MIDWEST.

4.  JET‐A HAS REVISED ITS BUSINESS PLAN TO INCLUDE ONLY ONE BOEING 737‐200, ST THIS TIME.

5.  JET‐A, LLC IS OWNED BY SHEARSON INTERNATIONAL CORP. AND DR. ROBERT J. HARIRI. DR.

HARIRI OWNS ALL AIRCRAFT CURRENTLY MANAGED AND OPERATED BY JET‐A, THROUGH WHOLLY

OWNED ENTITES OF DR. HARIRI.  ALL COSTS FIXED AND VARIABLE COSTS OF AIRCRAFT OWNERSHIP

AND OPERATION ARE ENTIRELY BORNE BY DR. HARIRI'S WHOLLY OWNED ENTITIES.  LEASE

AGREEMENTS FOR THE AIRCRAFT ARE HEREWITH ATTACHED.

Please call to discuss any comments.  

Regards,

Electronically Signed

Michael Origel
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 0106 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM150AD

SB.26 -077 -36250A.B, R3 --- 11/23/10 SB.26 -077 -36250A.B, R2 --- 10/14/10 SB.26 -077 -36250A, R1 --- 9/11/09 SB.26 -077 -36250A --- 9/4/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service

Cage-Free 

Verification Of 

USDA Graded 

Shell Eggs

The Quality Assessment Division (QAD) provides USDA 

Grading and Certification services for shell eggs on 

a voluntary, fee-for-service basis. These services are 

provided nationwide by highly trained, impartial USDA 

graders. Our services assist in the marketing of agricultural 

products worldwide.

Grading Service 

The grademark, or USDA shield, indicates that USDA has 

officially graded the product and that the product met all 

the requirements of the designated quality standard. In 

addition to quality grading, USDA graders inspect facilities 

for proper sanitation and refrigeration, and verify proper 

identification/traceability (code dating, plant numbers, 

etc.)

Officially graded product can be 

marketed using the USDA shield 

on the product labeling.

Certification Services

QAD can certify that shell eggs 

meet company-specific purchase 

requirements for a variety of 

needs, from tightened quality 

standards and labeling preferences 

to sourcing from cage-free flocks. 

This service ensures that shell 

egg purchasers – such as retail 

grocers, schools, restaurants, and 

the military - receive product 

that complies with their unique 

specifications and contractual 

requirements.

Truth in Labeling

All cartons bearing a USDA shield, 

whether packed to a purchase 

specification or not, must go 

through a pre-market approval 

process. QAD assesses whether 

claims are appropriate and 

verifiable.

Cage-Free Flock 

Verification

QAD verifies that farms have cagefree flock capacity as evidenced by 

observation.

• Once per year to verify

• Record general size of

flock

• Identify flock by address, code, 

flock ID, etc. (used at time of

packing)

Processing plants may pack eggs 

from several off site farms that 

produce cage-free eggs. QAD visits 

each farm/barn to verify production 

methods.

Segregation Plan and 

Monitoring

When cage-free eggs arrive at the 

processing facility with literally 

millions of other NON-CAGE 

FREE eggs, the company must 

first demonstrate their ability to 

segregate cage-free from non-cage 

free. 

The company must provide 

USDA a written plan detailing 

how they will maintain the 

segregation and identity of eggs 

for an identified cage-free source 

flock from production through 

storage, transport, processing and 

packaging. 

During processing, USDA assures 

only eligible eggs are packaged 

into cage-free cartons bearing a 

USDA shield.

December 2019 www.ams.usda.gov

Contact Us

U.S. Department of Agriculture, AMS, LP

 Quality Assessment Division

1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Stop 0258

Washington, DC 20250-0258

Mark Perigen, National Shell Egg Supervisor 

209.522.5251 / Mark.Perigen@ams.usda.gov

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
REGISTRATION

66330-334

Vol.2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
J-A32013-17

*Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

SHERRILYN D. WASHINGTON

Appellant

v.

HARRY E. HAMILTON

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

 PENNSYLVANIA

No. 124 MDA 2017

Appeal from the Order Entered December 1, 2016

in the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County

Civil Division at No(s): 04-2534

BEFORE: OTT, DUBOW, and STRASSBURGER, J.*

CONCURRING MEMORANDUM BY STRASSBURGER, J.: 

FILED SEPTEMBER 12, 2018

I join the Majority memorandum except for its analysis of the parties’

date of separation. 

With respect to that issue, the Divorce Code provides that “[i]n the 

event a complaint in divorce is filed and served, it shall be presumed that 

the parties commenced to live separate and apart not later than the date 

that the complaint was served.” 23 Pa.C.S. § 3103 (emphasis added). Here, 

neither party is arguing that the date of separation was later than the 

service of the complaint; instead, the parties are arguing that it was either 

the date of service (Wife) or earlier (Husband). Accordingly, use of a 

presumption, as applied by the Majority, is not appropriate. 

However, I agree with the Majority’s conclusion that there was no error 

or abuse of discretion by the trial court. The trial court considered the 
J-A32013-17

- 2 -

testimony of both Husband and Wife and credited Wife’s testimony that 

marital relations ceased in November 2001, shortly after both of Husband’s 

sons were born. It also credited Husband’s testimony that after that date the 

parties led separate lives, even though they were sometimes under the same 

roof. Such a conclusion was neither error nor abuse of discretion, and 

therefore Wife is not entitled to relief on this issue.
AMS Ground Beef Contractor Pathogen Performance - Fiscal Year: 20231/,2/

Contractor Sub-lots Produced (% of Total)

E. coli O157:H73/ Salmonella4/

# Positive % Positive # Positive % Positive

C1 131 (3.2) 0 0 1 0.76

C3 --- --- --- --- ---

C4 1,878 (46.3) 0 0 0 0

C5 148 (3.6) 0 0 0 0

C9 1,648 (40.6) 1 0.06 90 5.46

C23 --- --- --- --- ---

C29 154 (3.8) 3 1.95 19 12.34

C33 93 (2.3) 0 0 0 0

C39 8 (0.2) 0 0 0 0

Total 4,060 (100.0) 4 0.10 110 2.71

1/A full description of the ground beef purchase program specification is available at https://www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food/product-specs#Beef. 2/Production Dates: October 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023. 3/E. coli O157:H7 Critical Limit: Positive (+) Result / 325g.

4/Salmonella Critical Limit: Positive (+) Result / 325g.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1323

HENRY T. SANDERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF MARYLAND; PRINCE GEORGE’S COMMUNITY

COLLEGE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messite, District Judge.

(CA-04-175-PJM)

Submitted: July 15, 2004 Decided: July 20, 2004

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry T. Sanders, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Henry T. Sanders appeals the district court’s order

summarily dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See Sanders v. Maryland, No.

CA-04-175-PJM (D. Md. Feb. 24, 2004). We deny all of Sanders’

pending motions, including his motions for oral argument, vacation,

dismissal, a stay, and a response. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32.1





Section
1350 Certification





In
connection with the quarterly report of Lotus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Liu Zhong Yi, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




May
      15, 2009
                  /s/
      Liu Zhong YiLiu
      Zhong Yi, CEO and President,
                    principal
      executive officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D21-2067

_____________________________

JONATHAN HARTLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Marianne L. Aho, Judge.

September 2, 2021

PER CURIAM.

The Court dismisses this appeal as untimely filed. If 

Appellant seeks belated appeal, he must file a proper petition 

pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

LEWIS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

H. Kate Bedell of Bedell & Kuritz, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Alaska Environmental Studies Program http://www.boem.gov/akstudies/

Proposed Study for FY 2015

Formatting Guidance: We recommend study profiles be less than 2 pages. Please do not try to make this a detailed scope of work. If the study is selected for further consideration, BOEM will prepare a more detailed scope of work. Please provide the following categories of information.

Region: Sample Region

Planning Area(s ): All

Title: Sample Title and Profile to Show Formatting

BOEM Information Need(s) to be Addressed: Provide brief and conclusive reason(s) why BOEM needs the information. For example, identify how the study relates to analysis under the National Environmental Policy Act and/or specific BOEM decision(s), such as formulation of a mitigation measure. Pl ease be as specific as possible.

Period of Performance: FY 2015

- 20XX

Description: Background : Please provide 1 to 2 paragraphs on relevant issues. Explain what information is required and provide pertinent background. Include details about whether this study ties in with other efforts, and if so, how. Include a description of the current status of information. That is, what is the level of adequacy of existing information, does any exist, does it need to be more geographically specific?

Objectives : C learly and succinctly state the objective(s) of the study. Explain what hypothesis will be tested or what questions will be answered by this study. We encourage the use of lists (1, 2, 3, etc.) for multiple, related objectives.

Methods : Provide brief de tail on what information, techniques or methods are available that could be used. Explain how the objectives of the study will be accomplished.

Date information is required : Provide dates when products would be most useful and for what purpose, such as “ Final report is needed by September 2016 to support NEPA analysis for planned lease sales in 2017 .” If the study includes products additional to the scientific report (e.g. database, model, bibliography), explain in this section.

* Please keep in mind that studies proposed for our consideration must address specific BOEM mission and decision needs

. For further information, see the Alaska Annual Studies Plan FY 2014 , poste d at the website listed above.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BLACKWATER MIDSTREAM CORP. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael D. Suder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 14, 2008


                                 By:   /s/ Michael D. Suder
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Michael D. Suder, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
      32.1




Splinex
      Technology Inc.


500
      West
      Cypress Creek Road-Suite 100


Ft.
      Lauderdale, Florida, 33309




August
      21, 2006




Securities
      and Exchange Commission


100
      F
      Street, NE


Washington,
      DC 20549




Re:
      Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350




Dear
      Ladies and Gentlemen:




In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Splinex
      Technology Inc., for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, I, Gerard Herlihy,
      President and Chief Financial Officer of Splinex Technology Inc., hereby certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1)
            such
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Splinex Technology Inc., for the
                quarter ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements
                of
                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
            the
                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
                Splinex
                Technology Inc., for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, fairly presents,
                in
                all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of Splinex Technology Inc.




By:
            /s/
              Gerard A. HerlihyGerard
                  Herlihy
                President
                  and Chief Financial Officer
                (Principal
                  Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and
                  Duly
                  Authorized Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to Splinex Technology Inc. and
      will be retained by Splinex Technology Inc. and furnished to the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




In
      accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-B, this certification is
      being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to Splinex Technology Inc.’s quarterly
      report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the
      liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference
      in
      any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as
      expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.