alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 469 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 469

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 2002

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Authorizing the Rotunda of the Capitol to be used on September 19, 
2002, for a ceremony to present the Congressional Gold Medal to General 
                     Henry H. Shelton (USA, Ret.).

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on September 
19, 2002, for a ceremony to present the Congressional Gold Medal to 
General Henry H. Shelton (USA, Ret.). Physical preparations for the

ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 
Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 17, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 1376]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00110]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OA-2014-0001; FRL 9905-27-OA]

Good Neighbor Environmental Board; Notification of Public 
Advisory Committee Teleconference

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Public Advisory Committee Teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-
463, notice is hereby given that the Good Neighbor Environmental Board 
(GNEB) will hold a public teleconference on Friday, January 31, 2014. 
The meeting will take place from 12 p.m. to 4 p.m. Eastern Standard 
Time. The meeting is open to the public. For further information 
regarding the teleconference and background materials, please contact 
Ann-Marie Gantner at the number listed below.

DATES: Friday, January 31, 2014. The meeting will take place from 12 
p.m. to 4 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Background: GNEB is a federal advisory committee chartered under 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, PL 92463. GNEB provides advice and 
recommendations to the President and Congress on environmental and 
infrastructure issues along the U.S. border with Mexico.
    Purpose of Meeting: The purpose of this teleconference is to 
discuss the Good Neighbor Environmental Board's Sixteenth Report. The 
report will focus on ecological restoration in the U.S.-Mexico border 
region.
    General Information: The agenda and meeting materials will be 
available at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OA-
2014-0001. General information about GNEB can be found on its Web site 
at www.epa.gov/ofacmo/gneb.
    If you wish to make oral comments or submit written comments to the 
Board, please contact Ann-Marie Gantner at least five days prior to the 
meeting. Written comments should be submitted at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OA-2014-0001.
    Meeting Access: For information on access or services for 
individuals with disabilities, please contact Ann-Marie Gantner at 
(202) 564-4330 or email at gantner.ann-marie@epa.gov. To request 
accommodation of a disability, please contact Ann-Marie Gantner at 
least 10 days prior to the meeting to give EPA as much time as possible 
to process your request.

    Dated: January 2, 2013.
Ann-Marie Gantner,
Acting Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-00110 Filed 1-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  October 14, 2008
    /s/ Crit S. DeMentName:
    Crit S. DeMentTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner
Rev 0 (9/08) 

## Com **ments i**  **n Response to “**  **Final r**  **ule; r**  **equest for c**  **om ments**  **” Docket:**  **FAA -**  **20 13**  **- 0863**  **- Directorate Identifier**  **2013 -**  **NM -**  **178 -** **AD** Comments have been received in response to : **“ Final rule** **; request for comments,”** Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above. (Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted. Once you have made your determination, please fill in the commenter(s) name(s) and check the appropriate response below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, if necessary. Then **include your name and**  **the date**  in the spaces provided, and return it to the AD directorate focal. Th e FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we re ceived from: The Boeing Company, reference B - H210 - 13 - 00862 . **(Please check on**  **e**

**)** These comments **have not** been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration or change of this AD. These comments **have** been found to contain information that warrants consideration of additional regulatory

action. 

### (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual **FAA -**  **IR -**  **M -**  **8040.1 FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.)**

______ Narinder Luthra

_____ Dec 12, 2013

__ Name: Date:

(This form is part of the official docket file for this AD action.)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DONALD ROBERTS, MARILYN ROBERTS AND JASON ROBERTS,

Petitioners

v.

ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., BRENNTAG NORTHEAST, INC., BARLEY SNYDER, AND ALAN J. HAY, M.D.,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 669 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of May, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      322,208
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                               259,938
<ALLOWANCES>                                 95,000
<INVENTORY>                                 342,545
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            961,020
<PP&E>                                      147,709
<DEPRECIATION>                               48,975
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            2,957,375
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       575,447
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                     23,691
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                2,418,237
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              2,957,375
<SALES>                                   2,698,597
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          2,825,461
<CGS>                                     1,235,775
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             3,270,415
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (444,954)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (444,954)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                               (444,954)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)


</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Lawrence MATTHEWS, Jr. v. Frank C. BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 86-KH-0853.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 23, 1987.

In re Matthews, Lawrence Jr.; applying for post-conviction and supervisory writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 211-184.

Denied.
**EXHIBIT        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                  Nancy J. McGurk                                     |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Nancy                  J. McGurk                                         |
| Title: | Chief                  Financial Officer of the Managing General Partner |
| Date:  | November                  13, 2006                                       |
#### STATE ex rel., OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. Patrick Joseph ARMSTRONG, Respondent.

No. SCBD 2766.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Jan. 5, 1982.

Paul M. Vassar, Vassar, Craig & Vassar, Chandler, for petitioner.

Patrick Joseph Armstrong, respondent pro se.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

OPALA, Justice:

This cause is reached for consideration on petitioner’s motion to enter final order of discipline. Upon examination of the papers on file and after due notice to the respondent, the court finds and directs that:

(1) Respondent was charged by indictment in Cause No. CR-79-176-E, on the docket of the U. S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, with the crime of conspiracy to distribute Schedule I and II controlled substances, i.e. marihuana and cocaine; aiding and abetting in the possession with intent to distribute a Sched*1128ule I controlled substance; and possession with intent to distribute a Schedule I controlled substance, in violation of Title 21 U.S.C. Sections 846, 841(a)(1) and (2). He was convicted, after court trial, and sentenced on March 7, 1980 to confinement for a period of nine (9) years on count 1 and for a period of five (5) years on each of counts 2, 5 and 9. He was acquitted on counts 3 and 26 of the indictment.

(2) The U. S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the U. S. District Court by opinion filed therein on April 9,1981 which became final on May 4, 1981.

(3) Following a show-cause hearing on April 7,1980, this court ordered respondent suspended from the practice of law until final order of discipline may be rendered.

(4) By this court’s order of October 30, 1981, respondent was directed to show cause, by written response to be filed on or before November 16, 1981, why final order of discipline should not be made, inasmuch as his conviction stood affirmed and the affirmance became final. No response has been filed.

(5) The crime of which respondent stands convicted demonstrates his unfitness to practice law. Rules 7.1 and 7.5, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 52 OBJ 550, 563 (March 14, 1981).

(6) Respondent is accordingly disbarred and his name is ordered stricken from the roll of attorneys.

IRWIN, C. J., BARNES, V. C. J., and HODGES, LAVENDER, SIMMS, DOOLIN and HARGRAVE, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                          |                                       |                              |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Dated                  this 13th                  day                  of October, 2007. | By:                              | /s/ Liang              Zhang |
|                                                                                          | Liang              Zhang                   |
|                                                                                          | Chief                    Executive Officer |

----
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, DC 20590

Application to Amend

Section 333 Exemption No. 11351

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-1081

July 26, 2015

Petitioner:

bizUAS Corp

Bernd Lutz, PhD

CEO

4845 Pearl East Circle, Suite 101

Boulder, CO 80301

Tel: 303.931.4126

Email: bernd@bizUAS.com

Website: www.bizUAS.com

Greetings,

By letter from the FAA dated April 17, 2015, an exemption was granted to bizUAS Corp for relief under 

Section 333. That letter was marked Section 333 Exemption No. 11351 Regulatory Docket No. FAA2014-1081. 

bizUAS Corp hereby requests that the exemption so granted be amended to include service-drone 

Skycrane. Relevant facts and reasoning are:

 Skycrane is part of service-drone’s G4 family of industrial-grade, mission-proven (in Europe) 

multirotor Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS). All service-drone G4 UAS use the same flight 

control and RC transmitter category and are built with similar components. The G4 family 

includes the service-drone Eagle V2 which was approved under bizUAS’ FAA Exemption No. 

11351. The Skycrane compares to the Eagle as follows: 

o rotor diameter: 88cm Eagle – 114cm Skycrane

o height: 49cm Eagle – 50cm Skycrane

o MTOW: 6kg Eagle – 12kg Skycrane

 The findings, rationale and conclusions contained in FAA’s Exemption No. 11351 apply without 

modification to this application to include service-drone Skycrane in Exemption No. 11351.

Thank you for your consideration of this important request. Please advise us of any additional 

information that may be required.

Sincerely,

Bernd Lutz, PhD

CEO, bizUAS Corp
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0288

SAT Date: 2/26/2013

Print Date: 4/1/2013

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

3 12

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: ACUTE, BLOOD, MUTA, NEURO, ONCO, SENS-DERMAL, 

AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0288

FATE: 

log Kow = 3.85 (E) 

S = 1.12 mg/L at 25 C (E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP = 377 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)
log Koc = 4.77 (E)

log Fish BCF = 2.21 (E)

log Fish BAF = 2.71 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 25 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P3B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is nil through the skin as the neat material, 

poor through the skin when in solution, and poor through the lungs and GI tract based on 

physical/chemical properties. There is concern for acute toxicity based on data for 

 which had an approximate lethal dose (ALD) of 300 mg/kg (at 300 mg/kg and 

greater all test animals died). There is a marginal concern for oncogenicity based on substituted 

groups will keep the compound from being a ). 

There is also concern for possible methemoglobinemia, mutagenicity, and neurotoxicity based on 

 concern for retinopathy by analogy to compounds, and concern for 

dermal sensitization based on . Moderate concern. 

 Test Data: negative in Salmonella and E coli with and without 

activation

weakly positive in Salmonella strain TA1535 without activation, 

negative in E coli with and without activation

acute oral study in rats - all animals died at 300 mg/kg and greater

some eye irritation - all effects cleared by 48 hours

slight skin irritant, all effects cleared by 72 hours

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 2.4

daphnid 48-h LC50 2.2

green algal 96-h EC50 1.3

fish _ chronic value 0.011

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.011

algal _ chronic 

value

2.9

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_
Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for ; SAR 

chemical class = MW 320; log Kow = 3.85 (EPI); S = 1.12 mg/L (P); pH7; 

ECs based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <180.0 

mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

1

SARs

SAR Class

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8537]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than April, 25, 2012.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Andrew H. Wells, Tahlequah, Oklahoma, as trustee of The Clair 
Squyres Trust FBO Clair Squyres Wells and The Louise Squyres Trust FBO 
Earl E. Squyres; to acquire control of Maxlou Bancshares, Inc., and 
thereby indirectly acquire control of First State Bank, both in 
Tahlequah, Oklahoma.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 5, 2012.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012-8537 Filed 4-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Solo Cup Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the thirteen weeks ended
March 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert M. Korzenski, as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert M. Korzenski                                                                
|Robert M. Korzenski Chief
Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)

May 11, 2010

The foregoing certification
is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Ramsey Earl Mitchell

, * From the 238 th District Court

o f Midland County,

Trial Court No

. CR47519.

Vs. No. 11

- 19

- 0 0306

- CR * September 9 , 20 2 1

The State of Texas

, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J

. (P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.