alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 446 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 446

   Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the establishment of a 
                         College Savings Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 2002

 Mr. Rogers of Michigan submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the establishment of a 
                         College Savings Month.

Whereas the people of the United States recognize the challenge and accept the 
        responsibility of obtaining the education and skills that will enable 
        them to successfully compete in the global economy of the 21st century;
Whereas since 1980 the rate of increase of the cost of postsecondary education 
        has exceeded the rate of increase of inflation, public assistance to 
        students, and family income;
Whereas the rapidly rising cost of postsecondary education poses a serious 
        threat to the ability of the people of the United States to ensure their 
        and their children's access to postsecondary education;
Whereas since 1992 the annual amount of new student loan commitments has 
        increased from $15,000,000,000 to $35,000,000,000, which represents an 
        increasing burden on college graduates to pay for their college 
        education long after that education is completed;
Whereas it is in the interest of the Nation to ensure that the people of the 
        United States have the opportunity to obtain a postsecondary education 
        and to encourage parents to save for their children's education;
Whereas many States have offered tax incentives to encourage their citizens to 
        save for educational expenses;
Whereas additional Federal tax incentives to encourage the people of the United 
        States to save for educational expenses became effective after December 
        31, 2001; and
Whereas the establishment of September as College Savings Month would raise 
        public awareness about the need to save for educational expenses: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) a College Savings Month should be established to raise 
        public awareness about the need to save for educational 
        expenses; and
            (2) the President should issue a proclamation calling on 
        the people of the United States to observe such a month with 
        appropriate programs and activities.
                                 <all>
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 40309 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

BELINDA TELLEZ

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:17

- CR

- 705

- 4

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Belinda Tellez has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Tellez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief an d the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 8, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-40309 Document: 00514827604 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/08/2019No. 18

- 40309

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from furt her responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-40309 Document: 00514827604 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/08/2019
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of availability.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with Section 3(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, the USDA Forest Service, Washington Office, is transmitting the final boundary of the Presque Isle National Wild and Scenic River to Congress. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Information may be obtained by contacting Bill Baer, Recreation Program Manager, Ottawa National Forest, E6248 US Hwy 2, Ironwood, MI 49938, (906) 932-1330, ext. 342. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Presque Isle Wild and Scenic River boundary is available for review at the following offices: USDA Forest Service, Office of the Chief, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington DC 20024; USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region, Suite 400, 626 East Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53202 and; Ottawa National Forest, E6248 US Hwy 2, Ironwood, MI 49938. A detailed legal description is available upon request. 

The Michigan Scenic River Act of 1992 (Pub. L. 102-249-March 3, 1992) designated the Presque Isle River, Michigan, as a National Wild and Scenic River, to be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture. As specified by law, the boundary will not be effective until ninety days after Congress receives the transmittal. 

 Dated: March 7, 2012. 

Anthony V. Scardina, 

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 2012-7560 Filed 3-28-12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
*Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-30418

(Summary Calendar)

 

BETHANY YOUNG

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CITY OF SULPHUR

Defendant-Appellee

 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Louisiana

(97-CV-31)

 

August 8, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

In this suit alleging sex discrimination, pursuant to Title

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, PlaintiffAppellant Bethany Young appeals the district court’s grant of

Defendant-Appellee’s motion for summary judgment. Young was

employed by the City of Sulphur on a 90-day probationary basis, and

her employment was terminated before that temporary period expired.
She alleges that her termination was the result of sex

discrimination on the part of the police department. The City of

Sulphur argues in response that her termination was the result of

her inability to perform the requirements of her role as a police

officer. Having carefully and fully considered the record and the

briefs of counsel as well as the opinion of the district court, we

are satisfied that summary judgment was properly granted, and we

affirm the judgment of the district court for essentially the same

reasons set forth in its comprehensive opinion.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULES 13a‐14(a) AND 15d‐14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark Stone, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10‐K of Gores Holdings IX, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a‐15(e) and 15d‐15(e)) for the registrant and have

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)[omitted];

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: March 24, 2022

|        |                               |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |                          |
|   | /s/ Mark Stone                |
|   | Mark Stone                    |
|   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer) |
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 14 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                      February 8, 2001.
    Resolved, That the resolution from the House of Representatives (H. 
Con. Res. 14) entitled ``Concurrent resolution permitting the use of 
the Rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part of the commemoration 
of the days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust.'', do pass with 
the following

                               AMENDMENT:

    Page 1, line 3, strike out [April 18, 2001] and insert: April 19, 
2001

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 14

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-65,038-02

EX P ARTE BRANDON LOHRAN WOODARD, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. F 00-53218-M IN THE 194T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1 9 6 7 ). Applicant was convicted of the offense of capit al m urder and sentenc ed to imprisonment for life. The Fifth Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction in W

oodard v. State , No. 05-02-00839- CR (Tex. App– Dallas April 8, 2003, no pet.). On J anuar

y 27, 2014, the State filed an answe r to the instant a pplication and reque sted that the t rial court make finding s in reg ard to Applica nt’s claims of ac tual innocenc e. On Fe bruar y 11, 2014, a timely order desig nating issues was sig ned by the trial cour

t. Even thoug h it appear ed that the trial court wished to resolve the issues desig nated in the ODI , the habea s rec ord was forwa rded-2-

to this Court without any finding s. We rema nd this application to the 194th District Court of Dallas Cou n t y t o allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiar y investiga tion and enter the appropr iate finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law. This application will be held in abey ance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this order

. A supplemental trans cr i p t co n t aini ng all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court withi n 120 day s of the date of t his order

. Any extensions of t ime shall be obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: Oc tober 1, 2014 Do not publish
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8643]



[[Page 21760]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR12-19-000]


Atmos Energy Colorado/Kansas Division; Notice of Baseline Filing

    Take notice that on March 30, 2012, Atmos Energy Colorado/Kansas 
Division (Atmos) submitted a baseline filing of their Statement of 
Operating Conditions for services provided under Section 311 of the 
Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA) to comply with a Delegated Letter 
Order issued March 29, 2012, in Docket No. CP12-53-000 (138 FERC ] 
62,319).
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#51171403121e3f3d383f34022421213e232511373423327f363e27"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d89e9d8a9b97b6b4b1b6bd8bada8a8b7aaac98bebdaabbf6bfb7ae">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, April 16, 2012.

    Dated: April 4, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8643 Filed 4-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Order filed January 12, 2015

In The 

### Court of Appeals

For The 

### First District of Texas

___________ NO. 01

- 13

- 00975

- CR

____________ ANDREW J. SERRANO , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Crim Ct a t Law No 4

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1842255



### ORDERThis court has determined, pursuant to T exas Rule of Appellate Procedure

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of Stat e ’ s Exhibit 4

.
The exhibit clerk of the Co Crim Ct at Law No 4 is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this court the original of State ’ s Exhibit 4 , on or before January 22, 2015

. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon
comp letion of inspection, to return the original of State ’ s Exhibit 4 , to the clerk of
the Co Crim Ct at Law No 4.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 4.3



 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated May 26, 2022, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 571 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement
on Form S-6 (File No. 333-262742) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement
and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


May 26, 2022
J - S54025 - 18 2019 PA Supe r 62 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
v. BRIAN D. TANNER Appellant : : : : : : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

No. 211 WDA 2018 Appeal from the PCRA Order January 23, 2018 In the Court of Common Pleas of Lawrence County Criminal Division at No(s): CP
- 37 - CR - 0000060- 2015 BEFORE: PANELLA, J., LAZARUS, J., and MURRAY, J. CONCURRING AND DISSENTING STATEMENT BY LAZARUS, J.: FILED: February 27, 2019 I fully join in the majority’s considered analysis of the claims raised on appeal by Tanner. I write separately, however, because I diverge from the majority’s ultimate disposition in the instant case. The majority equates the plea negotiations in this matter with the situation in Melendez - Negron , and believes that Tanner’s entire guilty plea should be vacated on appeal due to a “shared misapprehension.” 123 A.3d at 1093- 94. In my opinion, I find that this result “jumps the gun” and usurps the trial judge’s role upon remand. In Melendez - Negron , the Commonwealth specifically stated that in agreeing to the mandatory minimum sentence, later determined illegal under Alleyne , it “gave up the opportunity to seek sentences on the drug paraphernalia and small amount of marijuana charges.” Id. at 1092.J - S54025 - 18

- 2 - Here, the trial judge should be given the first opportunity to determine whether and to what extent the restitution portion of Tanner’s plea , based upon the now- i nvalid premise that both the Township and Selective were victims under section 1106, played a role in the ultimate negotiated sentence. We have no way of knowing what factors the trial court took into consideration before accepting the plea agreement. The chang e in the law pursuant to Veon , which was decided more than seven months after the Commonwealth negotiated Tanner’s plea, may very well have affected the plea agreement both in terms of what the Commonwealth offered to Tanner and what may have been accepted by the trial court. The majority is correct that both the Commonwealth and the defendant are entitled to the benefit of their bargain. However, the determination of exactly what was the extent of that bargain must first be made before we sweepingly va cate the plea. Once that critical question is answered , then the trial court can either re - impose the same sentence or the parties can be permitted to renegotiate or proceed to trial.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 67 (Friday, April 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20794]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8382]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory Committee 
(NCADAC)

AGENCY: Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR), National 
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce 
(DOC).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the selection of the authors for the 
report of the next National Climate Assessment by the National Climate 
Assessment and Development Advisory Committee (NCADAC). The next 
National Climate Assessment will consist of 28 chapters, each drafted 
by a set of Convening Lead Authors and Lead Authors. The list of these 
by chapter can be found on the Web page http://www.globalchange.gov/what-we-do/assessment/people/nca-author-teams.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Cynthia Decker, Designated Federal 
Official, National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory 
Committee, NOAA OAR, R/SAB, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, 
Maryland 20910. (Phone: 301-734-1156, Fax: 301-713-1459, Email: 
[email protected]; or visit the NCADAC Web site at http://www.nesdis.noaa.gov/NCADAC/index.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Climate Assessment and 
Development Advisory Committee was established in December 2010. The 
committee's mission is to synthesize and summarize the science and 
information pertaining to current and future impacts of climate change 
upon the United States; and to provide advice and recommendations 
toward the development of an ongoing, sustainable national assessment 
of global change impacts and adaptation and mitigation strategies for 
the Nation. Within the scope of its mission, the committee's specific 
objective is to produce a National Climate Assessment.

Terry Bevels,
Acting Chief Financial Officer/Chief Administrative Officer, Office of 
Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-8382 Filed 4-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-KD-P
```