### 17322 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 6, 2010 / Proposed Rules

Area of Application. Survey area plus:

Texas:

Fannin Galveston Harris
El Paso Survey Area

Texas:

El Paso Area of Application. Survey area.

McLennan Survey Area

Texas:

McLennan Area of Application. Survey area.

Nueces Survey Area

Texas:

Nueces Area of Application. Survey area plus:

Texas:

Bee Calhoun Kleberg San Patricio Webb

Tarrant Survey Area

Texas:

Tarrant Area of Application. Survey area plus:

Texas:

Cooke Palo Pinto Taylor Survey Area

Texas:

Taylor Area of Application. Survey area.

Tom Green Survey Area

Texas:

Tom Green Area of Application. Survey area plus:

Texas:

Howard
Wichita Survey Area

Texas:

Wichita Area of Application. Survey area.

UTAH
Davis-Salt Lake-Weber Survey Area
Utah:

Davis Salt Lake Weber

Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Utah:

Box Elder Tooele Uintah

VIRGINIA Alexandria-Arlington-Fairfax Survey Area Virginia: (cities) Alexandria Virginia: (counties)

Arlington Fairfax Area of Application. Survey area.
Chesterfield-Richmond Survey Area Virginia: (cities)

Richmond Virginia: (counties)

Chesterfield Area of Application. Survey area plus: Virginia: (cities)

Bedford Charlottesville Salem Virginia: (counties)

Caroline Nottoway Prince George West Virginia:

Pendleton Hampton-Newport News Survey Area Virginia: (cities)

Hampton Newport News Area of Application. Survey area plus: Virginia: (cities)

Williamsburg Virginia: (counties)

York

Norfolk-Portsmouth-Virginia Beach Survey Area Virginia: (cities)

Norfolk Portsmouth Virginia Beach

Area of Application. Survey area plus:
North Carolina:

Pasquotank Virginia: (cities)

Chesapeake Suffolk Virginia: (counties)

Accomack Northampton
Prince William

Survey Area Virginia:

Prince William Area of Application. Survey area plus: Virginia:

Fauquier
WASHINGTON Kitsap Survey Area Washington:

Kitsap Area of Application. Survey area plus: Washington:

Clallam Jefferson
Pierce Survey Area Washington:

Pierce Area of Application. Survey area plus: Oregon: Clatsop Coos Douglas Multnomah Tillamook Washington:

Clark Grays Harbor
Snohomish Survey Area Washington:

Snohomish Area of Application. Survey area plus: Washington:

Island King Yakima Spokane Survey Area Washington:

Spokane Area of Application. Survey area plus: Washington:

Adams Walla Walla

WYOMING
Laramie Survey Area Wyoming:

Laramie Area of Application. Survey area.

[FR Doc. 2010–7764 Filed 4–5–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6325–39–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 71**

**[Docket No. FAA–2010–0083 Airspace Docket No. 10–AAL–5]** 

**Proposed Revocation of Class D and E Airspace; Big Delta, AK** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

**SUMMARY :**  This action proposes to revoke Class D and E airspace at Big Delta, AK. This airspace duplicates the controlled airspace for Delta Junction, Alaska, which serves Allen Army Airfield. The duplication makes this action necessary to eliminate possible confusion, and enhance safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received on or before May 21, 2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  Send comments on the proposal to the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground


### 17323 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 6, 2010 / Proposed Rules

Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590–0001. You must identify the docket number FAA–2010–0083/ Airspace Docket No. 10–AAL–5 at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone 1–800–647–5527) is on the plaza level of the Department of Transportation NASSIF Building at the above address.

An informal docket may also be examined during normal business hours at the office of the Manager, Safety, Alaska Flight Service Operations, Federal Aviation Administration, 222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14, Anchorage, AK 99513–7587.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Gary Rolf, Federal Aviation Administration, 222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14, Anchorage, AK 99513–7587; telephone number (907) 271–5898; fax: (907) 271– 2850; e-mail: gary.ctr.rolf@faa.gov. Internet address: http://www.faa.gov/ about/office

_ org/headquarters

_ offices/ ato/service

_ units/systemops/fs/alaskan/ rulemaking/.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
Comments Invited

Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic, environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal. Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ‘‘ Comments to Docket No. FAA–2010–0083/Airspace Docket No. 10–AAL–5. ’’ The postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.

All communications received on or before the specified closing date for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule. The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of comments received. All comments submitted will be available for examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the docket. Availability of NPRMs

An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking documents can also be accessed through the FAA’s Web page at http:// www.faa.gov/airports

_ airtraffic/ air

_ traffic/publications/ airspace

_ amendments/.

You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition, in person in the Federal Docket Management System Office (see

‘‘ **ADDRESSES** ’’ section for address and phone number) between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal business hours at the office of the Alaska Flight Services Information Area Group. Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future NPRM’s should contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking, (202) 267–9677, to request a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application procedure. The Proposal

This action proposes to amend Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by revoking Class D and E airspace at Big Delta, AK, to remove the discrepancy associated with existing airspace associated with Allen Army Airfield. Big Delta Class D and E airspace was previously associated with Allen Army Airfield, near Delta Junction, Alaska. The last airspace revision for Allen Army Airfield correctly identified the town of Delta Junction, but the Big Delta descriptions were not removed.

The Class D surface areas are published in paragraph 5000 in FAA Order 7400.9T, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15, 2009, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E2 surface areas are published in paragraph 6002 in FAA Order 7400.9T, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15, 2009, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E4 surface areas are published in paragraph 6004 in FAA Order 7400.9T, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15, 2009, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace areas designated as 700/1200 foot transition areas are published in paragraph 6005 in FAA Order 7400.9T, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15, 2009, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designations listed in this document would be subsequently published in the Order.

The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. It, therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘ significant regulatory action ’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘ significant rule ’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Because this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

The FAA’s authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle 1, section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency’s authority.

This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in subtitle VII, part A, subpart 1, section 40103, Sovereignty and use of airspace. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to ensure the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it proposes to revoke duplicate airspace associated with Allen Army Airfield, near Delta Junction, Alaska, and represents the FAA’s continuing effort to safely and efficiently use the navigable airspace. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air). The Proposed Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration


### 17324 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 6, 2010 / Proposed Rules

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

**PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND**  **CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND**  **REPORTING POINTS**

1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 1963 Comp., p. 389.

**§ 71.1 [Amended]**

2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation Administration Order 7400.9T, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15, 2009, is to be amended as follows:

* * * * *
Paragraph 5000 General.
* * * * *
AAL AK D Big Delta, AK [Removed]
* * * * *
Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Designated as Surface Areas.
* * * * *
AAL AK E2 Big Delta, AK [Removed]
* * * * *
Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as an Extension to a Class D or Class E Surface Area.
* * * * *
AAL AK E4 Big Delta, AK [Removed]
* * * * *
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.
* * * * *
AAL AK E5 Big Delta, AK [Removed]

Issued in Anchorage, AK, on March 9,
2010. Anthony M. Wylie, Manager, Alaska Flight Services Information Area Group.
[FR Doc. 2010–7775 Filed 4–5–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE**

**Bureau of Prisons**

**28 CFR Part 540**

**[BOP Docket No. 1148–P]**

**RIN 1120–AB48**

**Communication Management Units**

**AGENCY :**  Bureau of Prisons, Justice. **ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  In this document, the Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) proposes to establish and describe Communication Management Units (CMUs) by regulation. CMUs are designed to provide an inmate housing unit environment that enables staff monitoring of all communication between CMU inmates and persons in the community. The ability to monitor such communication is necessary to ensure the safety, security, and orderly operation of correctional facilities, and protect the public. The Bureau currently operates CMUs in two of its facilities. This rule would clarify existing Bureau practices with respect to CMUs.

**DATES :**  Comments are due by June 7,
2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  Written comments should be submitted to the Rules Unit, Office of General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, 320 First Street, NW., Washington, DC 20534. You may view an electronic version of this regulation at www.regulations.gov. You may also comment by using the www.regulations.gov comment form for this regulation. When submitting comments electronically you must include the BOP Docket No. in the subject box.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Sarah Qureshi, Office of General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, phone (202)
307–2105.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Posting of Public Comments

Please note that all comments received are considered part of the public record and made available for public inspection online at www.regulations.gov. Such information includes personal identifying information (such as your name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter.

If you want to submit personal identifying information (such as your name, address, etc. ) as part of your comment, but do not want it to be posted online, you must include the phrase ‘‘PERSONAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ’’ in the first paragraph of your comment. You must also locate all the personal identifying information you do not want posted online in the first paragraph of your comment and identify what information you want redacted.

If you want to submit confidential business information as part of your comment but do not want it to be posted online, you must include the phrase

‘‘ CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION ’’ in the first paragraph of your comment. You must also prominently identify confidential business information to be redacted within the comment. If a comment has so much confidential business information that it cannot be effectively redacted, all or part of that comment may not be posted on www.regulations.gov.

Personal identifying information identified and located as set forth above will be placed in the agency’s public docket file, but not posted online. Confidential business information identified and located as set forth above will not be placed in the public docket file. If you wish to inspect the agency’s public docket file in person by appointment, please see the **FOR**
**FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** paragraph.

Discussion

This proposed rule codifies and describes the Bureau’s procedures for designating inmates to, and limiting communication within, its Communication Management Units (CMU). Currently, the Bureau operates two CMUs, separately located at the Federal Correctional Complex (FCC), Terre Haute, Indiana (established in December 2006), and the United States Penitentiary (USP), Marion, Illinois (established in March 2008).

Current regulatory authority. The Bureau currently has regulatory authority to restrict the communications of high-risk inmates. See, e.g. 28 CFR 540.12 (authorizing Wardens to establish and exercise controls to protect individuals, security, discipline, and the good order of the institution); 28 CFR 540.14 (a) (indicating that institution staff shall open and inspect all incoming general correspondence.); 28 CFR 540.100 et seq. (authorizing limitations upon an inmate’s telephone privileges consistent with ensuring the security or good order of the institution or protection of the public, and authorizing Wardens to establish procedures that enable monitoring of telephone conversations); 28 CFR 540.40, et seq. (authorizing Wardens to limit inmate visiting when necessary to ensure the security and good order of the institution).

Purpose of the CMU regulations. The CMU regulations establish specific parameters for Bureau staff when operating CMUs while putting inmates and the public on notice of CMU operation.

The purpose of CMUs is to provide an inmate housing unit environment that enables staff to more effectively monitor communication between CMU inmates