BL D- 2 0 4 NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

___________ N o. 10- 1371

___________ V IN C E N T G L A Z E W S K I, A ppel l ant v. J O N C O R Z I N E , G overnor ; G E O R G E H A Y M A N , C om m i s s i oner of C orr ect i on s; JA M E S F . B A R B O , D i rect or of O perat i on s; L Y D E L L SH E R R E R , A dm i ni s tr at orN orthern St at e Pr i s on; A N G E L S A N T IA G O , S R ., A ss o c iate A d m in istra to r; E R IC S T O K E S , A s s is ta n t S up e ri n te n d e n t; D E A N Y A T A U R O , C hi ef of C us t ody ; R A N D Y C I C A L E , Speci al I nves t i gat i on D iv is io n ; P E T E R H A R V E Y , A tto rn e yG e n e ra l; J O S E P H L . T R A P P , A d m in is tr a to r o f

In v e s tig a tio n s ; S T E V E N L A P E N T A , S t a t e I n v e s t i g a t o rP r i s o n Co mp l a i n t s ; P AUL DUNN, Fi r s tShi ftL i eut enant ; C H A R L E S SIM PK I N S, Second Shi ft L ieu ten a n t; F R A N K IE JA M E S , F irst S h if t H o u sin g S e rg e a n t; J O H N C H A N D A , S e c o n dS h if t H o u s in g S e rg e a n t; G A R Y C O O K , C o rre c tio n s O f

f ice rs; B E N G A M B L E , C o rre c tio n s O f f ice r; C H A R L E S J A C K S O N , C o rr e c tio n s O f f ic e r; Z A K IA T W E E D Y , C o rrecti o n s O ff

icer; E R IC W IN G O , C o rrecti o n s O ff icer; RE G I N A LD FRA ZI ER , Corr e c t i on s O ff i c e r ; K EI TH D A V I S, C o rrecti o n s O ff

icer; E R IC W IL L IA M S , C o rrecti o n s O ff icer; N O R W O O D T H O M P S O N , C o rr e c tio n s O f f ic e r; T IM O T H Y F A T E , C o rre c tio n s O f

f ice r; W E N D E L L S M IT H , F o o dS e rv ice S up e rv iso r; M A H M O U D E L D E K K I, F o o dS e rv ice A ss ista n t S up e rv iso r; C H R IS T IN E F . B A R T O L O M E I, A d m in istra tiv e A n a ly st II; C . IFF E L , D epartm ent M anag er C orr ect i on M edicalS ervi ces; JO H N H O C H B E R G , M .D ., C o rre c tio n a l M e d ica l S e rv ice s; JO H N G O D IN S K Y , M . D . , C orr ect i on al M edicalS ervi ces; N A R S IM H A R E D D Y , M .D ., C o rre c tio n a l M e d ica l S e rv ice s; N IR A N JA N A S H A H , M .D ., C o rre c tio n a l M e d ica l S e rv ice s; JO E L B U C H H O L T Z , P . A . , C orr ect i on al M edicalS ervi ces; K A R E N M C B R IA R T , Q u a lity A s s u ra n c e ; S C O T T O R L A N S K I,2 H eal th Servi ces A dm i ni s tr at or ; B U SC A R , Supervi s orof N ur s es C o rr e c tio n a l M e d ic a l S e rv ic e s ; D R . R A L P H W O O D W A R D , D epartm entof C orr ect i ons ; M S. M C N A L L Y , U nknow n T i t l e N o rth ern S tat e P ri so n ; A L B E R T L E W IS , C o rrecti o n s O ff icer; U N KN O W N G IL L A R D , C o rr e c tio n s O f f ic e r; U N KN O W N R E Y N O L D S , C orr ect i ons O ffi cer ; U N KN O W N M C G E E T C H E N , C orr ect i ons Of f i c e r ; UNKNO WN F L US K, Co rr e c t i o n s Of f i c e r ; UNKNO WN J O H N S O N , C o rr e c tio n s O f f ic e r; U N KN O W N R A Y F O R D , C o rre c tio n s O f

f ice r; U N KN O W N A N D E R S O N , F irst S h if t S e rg e a n t; UNKNO WN HE AR T L AND, Co rr e c t i o n s Of f i c e r ; UNKNO WN COP E L AND, Co rr e c t i o n s Of

f i c e r ; UNK NOW N I NST I TUT I ONA L T RADE INST RUCTOR, F i r s tS h i f

t ; U N KN O WN E MA N U E L , F i r s tS h i f tL i e u t e n a n t ; U N KN O WN BL I CK Y, F i r s tS h i f

tCe n t e rKe e p e rCap t a i n ; UNKNO WN M CL OE D, S e c o n dS h if

t S e rg e a n t; U N KN O W N C O O P E R , C o rre c tio n s O f f ice r; U N KN O W N H I CK S- H O LLO W A Y , Corr e c t i on s O ff i c e r ; C. CU RT I S, C o rre c tio n s O f

f ice r; U N KN O W N H A R M O N , C o rre c tio n s O f f ice r; U N KN O W N P R O P E R T Y O F F IC E R , F ir st Sh iftC o rrecti o n s O ff icer; 1 T H R O U G H 10 0 JO H N D O E S , B ei ng F i ct i t i ou s N am es; 1 T H R O U G H 100 J A N E R O E S, B ei ng Fi ct i t i ous N ames

____________________________________ A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt forthe D i s tr i ctof N ew J er s ey ( D . C . C i vi l N o. 2- 06- cv- 04107) D i s tr i ctJudge: H onor abl e K athar i ne S. H ay den

____________________________________ S u b mi tt e df

o rP o s s i b l e Di s mi s s a l P u r s u a n tt o 2 8 U. S . C. § 1 9 1 5 ( e ) ( 2 ) ( B) o r S u m m a ry A c tio n P u rs u a n t to T h ir dC ir c u it L A R 2 7 .4 a n dI.O .P . 1 0 .6 M ay20, 2010 B efor e: R E N D E L L , C H A G A R E S and V A N A SK I E , C i r cui tJudges ( Fi l ed: Jul y1, 2010)

_________ OPINI ON O F THE COURT

_________3

P E R C UR I AM V i ncentG l aze w s ki , a N ew J er s eys t at e i nm at e, appea l s pr o s e fr om the D i s tr i ct C o u rt ’s gra n t of

d ef en d an ts’ m o ti o n s fo r sum m aryjud g m en t. B ec au se G laze w sk i’ s ap p e a l p r e s e n t s n o s u b s t a n t i a l q u e s t i o n , we wi l l s u mmar i l ya f f i rm. I . I n A ugus t2006, G l aze w s ki fi l ed a c i vi l r i ght s act i on pur s uantt o 42 U . S. C . § 1983 foral l eged vi ol at i ons of the Ei ghth and Fourt eenth A m endment s w hi l e he w as hous ed at N orthern St at e Pr i s on (N SP). G l aze w s ki fi l ed an a m ended c om pl ai nti n N ovember2007 t o add addi t i onal defe ndant s , i ncl udi ng N SP offi ci al s and pr i s on m edi cals ervi ce p ro v id e rs . G l aze w s ki al l eged thatthe medi caltr eatm enthe r ece i ved forchr oni c my el ogenous l euk em i a (“C M L ”) am ou nted t o a v i olat i on of h i s E i gh th A m end m ent r i gh t s. H e al so ar gued thathe w as depr i ved of hi s pr es cr i bed medi caldi et . I n addi t i on, G l aze w s ki al l eged thatthe fol l ow i ng condi t i ons of conf i nementatN SP w er e uncons t i tut i onal : ( 1) s ubj ect ed t o s econd hand s m oke bybei ng hous ed i n cel l s w i th s m oker s ; ( 2) pl ace d i n a t op bunk des pi t e medi calr es tr i ct i ons t o a bott om bunk as s i gnm ent ; ( 3) notpr ot ect ed fr om tw o gang- r el at ed as s aul t s byotheri nm at es ; ( 4) for ced t o l i ve i n uncl ean c ondi t i ons w i thoutthe appr opr i at e amountof cl eani ng s uppl i es ; and ( 5) w r ongl ydepr i ved of pr op e rtyw hi l e ho us e d a tN SP. D efe ndant s s epar at el yfi l ed tw o m ot i ons fors um m aryj udgm ent , one on beha l f of4

the “s t at e def

endant s ” and the otheras “medi caldefe ndant s . ” The D i s tr i ctC ourtgr ant ed these m oti on s and d i sm i ssed G l azew ski ’s l aw sui t . W i th respectt o the st at e def end ants , the courtfound thatG l aze w s ki admi tt ed thathe r ece i ved medi calcar e and tr eatm ent , and a d d u c e dn o e v id e n c e s h o w in g th a t th e s ta te d e f e n d a n ts k n e w o f

a n ym is tr e a tm e n t. G l aze w s ki al s o coul d nots how thatthes e def endant s di r ect l yori nt ent i onal l yi nt er fer ed w ith , o r w e re d e lib e ra telyin d if f e re n t to , h is re c e ip t o f

h is m e d ica l d iet. W ith re sp e c t to the medi caldefe ndant s , the D i s tr i ctC ourtci t ed the r ecor d’ s ext ens i ve document at i on of G laz e w sk i’s m e d ica l trea tm e n t, m e d ica tio n s, c o n su ltatio n s, e v a lu a tio n s, a n db lo o dtes ts to fi nd that G l azew ski fai l ed to est abli sh deli berat e i nd i fference. T he D i stri ctC ou rtal so concluded thatG l aze w s ki had nots how n thatthe s t at e def endant s knew of and di s r egar ded a s er i ous r i s k of phy s i calharm byotheri nm at es . Fi nal l y , the courtfound that G l aze w s ki fai l ed t o s us t ai n anyof hi s cl ai m s fori nhum ane c ondi t i ons of conf i nementor propertycl ai m s. A s such, the co urtdis m i ssed al l cl ai m s agai nstal l defe nd ants . G la z e w s k i f

ile datim e ly ap p e a l. W e h a v e ju ri s d ic tio n u n d e r 2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e w i l l s um m ar i l yaff

i rm i f G l aze w s ki ’ s appea l pr es ent s no s ubs t ant i al ques t i on. See 3d C ir. L .A .R . 2 7 .4 a n d3 dC ir. I. O .P . 1 0 .6 . W e n o te th a t G laz e w sk i in c lu d e s n e w c laim s in hi s m ot i on fi l ed i n s upportof hi s appea l . T o the ext entthathe s eeks t o expand the s cope of hi s § 1983 act i on fi l ed i n the D i s tr i ctC ourt , w e w i l l notcons i derthes e new cl ai m s for th e f irst tim e o n ap p e a l. W e exe r ci s e pl enaryr evi ew overthe D i s tr i ctC ourt ’ s or dergr ant i ng the mot i on for5

s u m m a ry ju d g m e n t. S e e K a u c h e r v . C o u n ty o f B u c k s , 4 5 5 F .3 d4 1 8 , 4 2 2 (3 dC ir . 2 0 0 6 ). Sum m aryj udgm enti s pr operi f ther e i s no genui ne i s s ue as t o anym at er i al fac tand the m ovanti s ent i t l ed t o j udgm entas a matt erof l aw . Fed. R . C i v. P. 56( c) . A n i s s ue of m at er i al fac texi s t s onl yi f “the evi dence i s s uch thata r eas onabl e j urycoul d r eturn a ver di ctforthe nonmovi ng party . ” A nder s on v. L i bertyL obby , I nc. , 477 U . S. 242, 248 ( 1986) . T o over come a m ot i on fors um m aryj udgm ent , the non- m ovi ng partym us t“s et o u t spe cific f

ac ts sho w ing a g en u ine issu e f o r tri al. ” F ed . R . C iv. P. 56 (e)(2). II. T o sh o w th a t h is m e d ica l ca re a m o u n ted to av io latio n u n d e r th e E ig h th A m e n d m e n t, G laz e w sk i m u st d e m o n stra te “ (1 ) th a t th e d e f e n d a n ts w e re d e lib e ra tely i ndi ffe r entt o [hi s ] m edi calneeds and ( 2) thatthos e nee ds w er e s er i ous . ” R ous e v. Pl ant i er , 182 F. 3d 192, 197 ( 3d C i r . 1999) ( ci t i ng E s t el l e v. G ambl e, 429 U . S. 97, 106 (1 9 7 6 )). G laz e w sk i m u st p ro v id e a n e v id e n tiary ba sis f o r c o n c lu d in g th a t p riso n o f f icia ls had a “ s uffi ci ent l yculpabl e s t at e of mi nd. ” Farm erv. B r ennan, 511 U . S. 825, 834 (1 9 9 4 ). D e lib e ra te in d if f e re n c e re q u ire s th a t p riso n o f f icia ls k n o w o f

a n e x c e ss iv e risk to a n in m a te ’s h e a lth o r s a f e ty an da f

f irm a tiv e ly d is re g a rd th a t r is k . Id . a t 8 3 7 -3 8 . A tthe out s et , w e not e thatG l aze w s ki fai l s t o demonstr at e thatdefe ndant s act ed w i th d el i berat e i nd i fference. R ather, i tapp ears that G l azew ski dis agrees w i th the cou rs e and mannerof hi s tr eatm ent , w hi ch does nots t at e a c ons t i tut i onal vi ol at i on. Sprui l l v. G i l l i s, 37 2 F . 3d 21 8, 23 5 (3d C i r. 20 04 ). S um m aryj ud gm ent w as al so prope r because6

Gl a z e ws k i f

a i l e dt o p r o v i d e e v i d e n c e th a two u l ds h o w a g e n u i n e i s s u e a ttr i a l . F e d . R. C i v. P. 56( e) . Forexampl e, i n s upportof hi s appea l , he di s put es the dat es on w hi ch he r ece i ved medi cat i on and bl ood w ork, ar gui ng thati tw as oft en del ay ed, butconce di ng that he r ece i ved tr eatm ent . I n addi t i on, he fa i l s t o s how thatpr i s on offi ci al s act ed w i th a

“ s u f f ic ie n tly c u lp ab le s ta te o f m in d .” F a rm e r, 5 1 1 U .S . a t 8 3 4 . I ti s cl earfr om the r ecor d thatG l aze w s ki r ece i ved ext ens i ve medi calcar e af t erhe w as di agnos ed w i th l eukemi a i n 2002. W i th r es pectt o the s t at e def endant s , G l aze w s ki fai l ed t o s how thatthes e def endant s knew of anym i s tr eatm entw hi l e he w as underthe c a re o f th e p riso n ’s m e d ica l p ro f e ss io n a ls. H is c laim a g a in st th e m e d ica l d e f e n d a n ts is al s o bas el es s , as hi s m edi calr ecor ds i ndi cat e thathe r ece i ved di agnos t i c t es t s , w as pr es cr i bed medi cat i on, and r ece i ved numer ous oncol ogyand bone marr ow tr ans pl ant cons ul t at i ons and eva l uat i ons . T hr oughoutthe cour s e of hi s car e, G l aze w s ki al s o r efus ed tre a tm e n t. Y e t, ev e n w ith th e se re f u sa ls, G laz e w sk i stillre c e iv e da t lea st 4 3 b lo o dtes ts fr om D ece m ber2003 t o Sept ember2008 and 14 cons ul t at i ons fr om J anuary2004 thr ough A ug ust20 08 . A ccordi ng l y , he can no tshow deliberat e i nd i fference to hi s m edicalneed s. In a d d iti o n , the c ru x o f G laz e w sk i’s c laim –th a t d e f e n d a n ts d idn o t p ro v id e h is pr es cr i pt i on i n the t abl etform thathe w ant ed – i s w i thoutm er i t . B egi nni ng on M ar ch 19, 2004, G l aze w s ki r efus ed hi s m onthl ydos age of G l eeva c for50 day s becaus e he ar gued thatan oncol ogi s tor der ed the medi cat i on i n fourdos es of 100 m g t abl etform , and notE ven i f true, G l aze w s ki has notes t abl i s hed thatthe pr ovi s i on of one 400 mi l l i gr am 1 G lee v a c p illa s o p p o se dto f o u r 1 0 0 m ill ig ra m p ill s in d ica tes th a t d e f e n d a n ts a c ted w ith a n yc u lp ab le s ta te o r m in do r d e lib e ra te in d if f e re n c e . 7 4 0 0 m g tab lets . H o w e v e r, “m e re d isa g re e m e n t as to th e p ro p e r m e d ica l trea tm e n t” is 1 i nsuff i ci ent t o st at e a con st i tuti on al viol at i on . S prui l l , 37 2 F . 3d at23 5. G l azew ski al so pr ovi des no pr oof thatan oncol ogi s tpr es cr i bed how he s houl d r ece i ve hi s dos age, and the r ecor d i ndi cat es thataft erJune 2004, G l aze w s ki ’ s doct or s i nt er change abl ypr es cr i bed eac h type of dos age, both of w hi ch G l aze w s ki acc ept ed. G l aze w s ki , how ever , cont ends th a t h e is n o lo n g e r in re m iss io n a n dap p e a rs to a ttribu te h is c o n d iti o n to in a d e q u a te m e d ica l ca re . T h e re c o rd in d ica tes th a t G laz e w sk i ad m itt e dth a t h e h a s n e v e r b e e n to ld thathe i s no l ongeri n r emi s s i on byanydoct orand he doe s notpr ovi de evi dence t o the con trary . A ccordi ng l y , his cl ai m fai l s. W i th r es pectt o hi s m edi caldi et , G l aze w s ki fi l ed numer ous admi ni s tr at i ve r emedy form s , and the r ecor d s how s thattheyr ece i ved w r i tt en r es pons es fol l ow ed bycorr ect i ve ac ti o n . A s the D istri ct C o u rtfo u n d , G laze w sk i did n o t al lege that d ef en d an ts w ere i nt er fer i ng w i th ordel i ber at el yi ndi ffe r entt o the pr ovi s i on of hi s m eal s . R ather , the r ecor d s how s thatG l aze w s ki bel i eved thatthe meal s w er e s t ol en byotheri nm at es ornot p re p a re d . G laz e w sk i h a s n o t p o in ted to a n ye v id e n c e in th e re c o rd th a t w o u ldsu p p o rt a re a so n ab le in f

e re n c e th a t an yn a m e dd e f e n d a n t d ire c tlyd isru p ted , o r w a s d e lib e ra tely i ndi ffe r entt o, hi s r ece i ptof m eal s . O n the contr ary , the evi dence s how s thatpr i s on offi ci al s pr om pt l yatt empt ed t o r emedyanyi ns t ance of a mi s s i ng m eal , for ecl os i ng a8

fin d ing o f a cu lpab le st ate o f m ind . T h ere fo re, sum m aryjud g m en t w as p rop er. III . G l aze w s ki ’ s cl ai m thatthe s t at e def endant s fai l ed t o pr ot ecthi m fr om as s aul tby otheri nm at es fai l s . T he Ei ghth A m endmenti m pos es “a dutyon pr i s on offi ci al s t o t ake re a s o n ab le m e a s u re s to p ro te c t p ri s o n e rs f ro m v io le n c e a t th e h a n d s o f o th e r p ri s o n e rs .” H ami l t on v. L eavy , 117 F. 3d 742, 746 ( 3d C i r . 1997) ( ci t at i ons and i nt ernal quot at i ons om i tt ed) . T o es t abl i s h a fa i l ur e t o pr ot ectcl ai m , an i nm at e mustdemonstr at e that : ( 1) he i s “i ncar cer at ed undercondi t i ons pos i ng a s ubs t ant i al r i s k of s er i ous harm ; ” and ( 2) the pr i s on offi ci al act ed w i th “del i ber at e i ndi ffe r ence ” t o hi s heal th and s afe ty . Farm er , 511 U . S. at834. “[T] he off i ci al m us tactual l ybe aw ar e of the exi s t ence of the exc es s i ve r i s k; it i s n o t su f

f icie n t th a t th e o f

f icia l sh o u ldh a v e b e e n a w a re .” B e e rs- C ap ito l v . W h e tze l, 2 5 6 F .3 d1 2 0 , 1 3 3 (3 dC ir . 2 0 0 1 ). In h is c o m p lain t, G laz e w sk i co n c e d e s th a t h e d idn o t re p o rt o n e p h y sic a l as sa u lt t o pr i s on s t aff

forfearof i nm at e r etr i but i on. W hen he r eport ed anotheras s aul t , he w as pl ace d i n T empora ryC l os ed C us t odyw hi l e an i nves t i gat i on w as pendi ng. G l aze w s ki p ro v id e dn o e v id e n c e sh o w in g th a t th e p riso n o f f icia ls w e re a w a re o f

th e th re a t o f

a ss a u lt befor e anyof the i nci dent s occurr ed. I n addi t i on, as pr i s on offi ci al s t ook s t eps t o pr ot ect hi m aft erhe w as att acke d and the r ecor d i ndi cat es thatG l aze w s ki di d nots uffe r su b seq u en t attack s, su m m aryjud g m en t w as p rop er.9 I V .

Sum m aryj udgm entw as al s o pr oper l ygr ant ed r egar di ng G l aze w s ki ’ s condi t i ons of c o n f in e m e n t cla im s. “ A p riso n o f f icia l ca n n o t b e f

o u n dliab le u n d e r th e E ig h th A m endmentfordeny i ng an i nm at e humane condi t i ons of conf i nementunl es s the off

i ci al kn ow s of an d d i sr egards an ex cessi ve ri sk t o inm at e health o r s afety ; the o ffi ci al m ust both be aw ar e of f

act s fr om w hi ch the i nfer ence coul d be dr aw n thata s ubs t ant i al r i s k of s e ri o u s h a rm e x is ts , a n dh e m u s t a ls o d ra w th e in f e re n c e .” F a rm e r, 5 1 1 U .S . a t 8 3 7 . W i th r es pectt o hi s al l egat i on thathe w as expos ed t o s econd hand s m oke bybei ng hous ed w i th s m oker s , G l aze w s ki m us ts how ( 1) a s uffi ci ent l ys er i ous m edi calneed r el at ed t o s econd hand s m oke expos ur e; and ( 2) del i ber at e i ndi ffe r ence bythe pr i s on a u th o ri tie s to th a t n e e d . S e e A tk in s o n v . T a y lo r, 3 1 6 F .3 d2 5 7 , 2 6 6 (3 dC ir . 2 0 0 3 ). G l aze w s ki acknow l edges thats m oki ng i nm at es hi d thei rs m oki ng fr om offi cer s . A s the D i s tr i ctC ourtfound, pr i s on offi ci al s m oved G l aze w s ki t o a new cel l w heneve rhe compl ai ned. T hus , even i f G l aze w s ki s uffi ci ent l ycoul d pr evai l on the fi r s tpr ong under A tk in s o n , h e f

a ils to s h o w a n yd e lib e ra te in d if f e re n c e b yp ri s o n o f

f ic ia ls . T o s h o w th a t p ri s o n c o n d itio n s a m o u n t to a n E ig h th A m e n d m e n t v io la tio n , a pl ai nt i ff mustes t abl i s h thatl i vi ng condi t i ons ar e cruel ordepr i ve hi m of the nec es s i t i es of lif e a n dth a t th e c o n d itio n s e x is t a s are s u lt o f d e lib e ra te in d if

f e re n c e b yp ri s o n o f

f ic ia ls . See R hodes v. C hapman, 452 U . S. 337, 346- 48 ( 1981) ; W i l s on v. Sei t er , 501 U . S. 294, 298- 99 ( 1991) . W i th r es pectt o the cl eanl i nes s of the pr i s on, the r ecor d s how s that10

G laz e w sk i co n c e d e dth a t in m a tes a re re sp o n sib le to m a in tain th e c lea n lin e ss o f th e ir c e lls and thats uppl i es w er e di s tr i but ed bys t aff . H i s compl ai ntthathe w as notgi ven s uffi ci ent cl eani ng s uppl i es i s i ns uffi ci entt o s t at e a c ons t i tut i onal vi ol at i on. Si m i l ar l y , aft erhe compl ai ned t o pr i s on offi ci al s forbei ng pl ace d on a t op bunk, he w as m oved t o a bott om bunk perhi s m edi calauthor i zat i on. A s G l aze w s ki fai l s t o s how anycons t i tut i onal v iolati o n , su m m aryjud g m en t on thes e c lai m s w as th ere fo re p rop er. V . Fi nal l y , G l aze w s ki ’ s cl ai m thatpr i s on offi ci al s depr i ved hi m of hi s pr opertyw as pr oper l ydi s m i s s ed bec aus e no due pr oces s vi ol at i on exi s t s i f a meani ngful pos t - depr i vat i on r emedyforthe l os s i s avai l abl e. H uds on v. Pal m er , 468 U . S. 517, 533 ( 1984) . W e have pr evi ous l yhel d thatthe pr i s on’ s gr i evanc e pr ogr am and i nt ernal r evi ew pr ovi de an a dequat e pos t - depr i vat i on r emedyt o s at i s fydue pr oces s . T i l l m an v. L ebanon C ountyC orr . Faci l i ty , 221 F. 3d 410, 422 ( 3d C i r . 2000) ; R evel l v. PortA uth. , 598 F. 3d 128, 138- 39 ( 3d C i r . 2010) ( di s cus s i ng N ew J er s ey ’ s pos t - depr i vat i on r emedy pr ocedur es ) . G l aze w s ki has pr ovi ded no bas i s forconcludi ng otherw i s e i n hi s cas e. V I. A s no s ubs t ant i al ques t i on i s pr es ent ed i n thi s appea l , w e s um m ar i l yaff i rm the D i s tr i ctC ourt ’ s deci s i on.