alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

|                     | Tel: (604) 688-5421      | BDO Canada LLP |
|---------------------|--------------------------|----------------|
| Fax: (604) 688-5132 | 1100 Royal Centre        |
| **www.bdo.ca**      | 1055 West Georgia Street |
|                | Vancouver, BC            |
|                | V6E 3P3                  |

Exhibit 99.9

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the use of our report dated June 29, 2022 on the consolidated financial statements of Zentek Ltd. (formerly Zen Graphene Solutions Ltd.) ("the Company") for the year ended March 31, 2022 included in this annual report on Form 40-F.

*/s/ BDO Canada LLPBDO Canada LLPVancouver, British ColumbiaJune 29, 2022*

 

BDO Canada LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership, is a member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the international BDO network of independent member firms.

----
----

|  | 1 | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--|---|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: March 29, 2022 | /s/ Paul Bascobert             |
|----------------------|--------------------------------|
|                 | Name: Paul Bascobert           |
|                 | Title: Chief Executive Officer |
|                 | (Principal Executive Officer)  |

----
```

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rand Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I Laurence S. Levy, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ Laurence S. Levy                                Dated: August 15, 2005
    ------------------------------
        Laurence S. Levy
        Chairman of the Board and Chief
        Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive and Principal Financial
        and Accounting Officer)
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8681]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board


Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from GATX 
Corporation (WB512-16--3/22/2012), for permission to use certain data 
from the Board's 2010 Carload Waybill Samples. A copy of this request 
may be obtained from the Office of Economics.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics 
within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for 
release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.
    Contact: Marcin Skomial (202) 245-0344.

Raina S. White,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2012-8681 Filed 4-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD BENTON, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. BAKER HUGHES, a Texas Corporation; BAKER PETROLITE, a Texas Corporation, Defendants

- Appellees. No. 13

- 5635 6 D.C. No. 2:12

- cv - 07735

- MMM

MRW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 18, 2015 * * Before: TASHIMA, OWENS, and FRIEDLAND, C ircuit Judges

. Edward Benton appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in his diversity action alleging state law contract and tort claims in connection with his chemical transportation business. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 1 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 13

- 56356 § 1291. We re view de novo a district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

. Pride v.
Correa , 719 F.3d 1130, 1133 (9th Cir. 2013). We affirm

. The district court properly dismissed Benton’s breach of an implied

- in

fact contract claim because Benton failed to allege facts sufficient to show the
existence of a valid contract. See Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1549, 1550, 1621 (defining a contract and an implied contract, and setting forth the elements of a contract );
Amelco Elec. v. City of Thousand Oaks , 38 P.3d 1120, 1129

- 30 (Cal. 2002) (elements of a breach of contract claim under California law ); see also Daniels

Hall v. Nat’l Educ. Ass’ n , 629 F.3d 992, 998 (9th Cir. 2010) (courts need not accept as true allegat ions contradict ed by exhibits to the complaint ). The district court properly dismissed Benton’s intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”) claim because Benton failed to allege facts
sufficient to show that defendants acted with intent to cause or reckless disregard of the probability of causing emotional distress

. See Avina v. United
States , 681 F.3d 1127, 1131 (9th Cir. 2012) (elements of an IIED claim under
California law ).
Because we affirm on th e above bases, we do not consider Benton’s3 13

- 56356 arg uments concerning the timeliness of his claims. We reject Benton’s contention that the district court erred by giving him only 30 days to retain counsel , and defendants’ contention that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal

. We do not consider iss ues that are not supported by argument or clearly
and distinctl y raised in the opening brief. See Pierce v. Multnomah County , Or. , 76 F.3d 1032, 1037 n. 3 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not supported by argument in pro se brief are deemed abandoned ); Greenwood v. FAA , 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (“We review only issues which are argued specifi cally and distinctly in a party’ s opening brief.”)

. AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSB Holdings, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30 , 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Robert G. Cocks, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that to the best ofmy knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;  and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the datesand for the periods covered by the report.

 

 
| Date:  November 14, 2005    |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
|                                  |
| /s/ Robert G. Cocks, Jr.         |   |
| Robert G. Cocks, Jr.             |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. KENNETH HUIDONG KANG, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-10567

D.C . No. 1:12-c r-00042-FM TG M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t

of Gua m Franc e s M . Ty dingc o-Gate w ood, C hie f Judge , Pre siding

Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 20, 2016 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, TASHIM A, a nd NGUYEN, C irc uit Judge s. Ke nne th Huidong Ka

ng a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the six-m onth se nte n c e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c o nvic tion for c rim ina l c onspira c y , in viola tion of 18 U.S.C . §§ 2 a

nd 371, a nd ha rboring ille ga l a lie ns, in viola

tion of 8 U.S.C . § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) a nd (a )(1)(B )(i). W e have



# FIL ED JAN 28 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . Kang a rgue s tha t the distric t c ourt e rre d by de ny ing his re que st for a thre e le ve l m itiga

ting rolea djustm e nt unde r U.S.S.G. § 3B 1.2. W e re vie w a distric t c ourt’ s de te rm ination tha

t a de fe nda nt did not ha

ve a m itiga

te d role for c le ar e rror. Se e Unite d State

s v . Rosas , 615 F.3d 1058, 1066 (9th C ir. 2010). In light of the fa c t s, inc luding thele ngth of Ka ng’ s involve m e nt in thec onspira c y and his ha rboring of ille g a l a lie ns in his own hom e , the distric t c ourt did not c le arly e rr in de ny ing thea djustm e nt. Se e id. at 1067-68. AFFIRM E D.

1 4 - 1 0 5 6 7 2
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

BRYANT ELIJAH DEXTER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-4902 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed October 3, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Samantha L. Ward, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Tim Bower Rodriguez, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Chelsea S. Alper, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
**Exhibit 32.2**

GMH COMMUNITIESTRUST

CERTIFICATIONREQUIRED BYRULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, J. Patrick O’Grady,acting in the capacity of Principal Financial Officer of GMH Communities Trust,a Maryland real estate investment trust (the “Company”), hereby certify that,to my knowledge:

(1)          The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2007 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)          The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

*        *        *
| /s/ J. Patrick O’Grady                                                         |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| J. Patrick O’Grady                                                             |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer) |
|                                                                                |
|                                                                                |
| Date: August 9, 2007                                                                |

 

----
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

274 KA 15-01098 PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN,

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JACOB MELVIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (TIMOTHY P. MURPHY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MICHAEL J. FLAHERTY, JR., ACTING DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (NICHOLAS T. TEXIDO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered March 18, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of assault in the second degree (two counts). It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law, the guilty pleas are vacated, the superior court information is dismissed and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for proceedings pursuant to CPL 470.45.
Same memorandum as in People v Melvin ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Mar. 31, 2017]).

Entered: March 31, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### Joseph John PITZER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. M-81-729.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Sept. 29, 1982.

*1071Kevin Murphy, Ponca City, for appellant.

Jan Eric Cartwright, Atty. Gen., Patrick W. Willison, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

In his sole assignment of error on appeal from his conviction in Kay County District Court, Case No. CRM-80-517, for the crime of Omitting to Provide for a minor Child, in which he was sentenced to serve one (1) weekend a month for twelve (12) months, in the county jail, in accordance with the jury’s verdict, the appellant alleges that the verdict was ambiguous, uncertain and insufficient to support his conviction, because the word “weekend” is subject to interpretation. We disagree.

Title 22 O.S.1981, § 991a-l, Nonviolent offenders — Night or weekend incarceration, states in pertinent part as follows:

> For the purposes of this section, weekend incarceration shall commence at 6 o’clock p. m. on Friday and continue until 8 o’clock a. m. on the following Monday, and incarceration overnight shall commence at 6 o’clock p. m. on one day and continue until 8 o’clock a. m. of the next day. Provided, that the sentencing judge may modify said times if the circumstances of the particular case require such action.

In light of the statute, we find both the verdict of the jury, and the modification thereof by the trial court, to be proper.

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is AFFIRMED.

BRETT, P. J., and CORNISH, J., concur.
**
Exhibit 31.1 

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function 

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)

**CERTIFICATION**

I, KevinJ. Cullum, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2022-A Owner Trust(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. I amresponsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association 

Date: June 27, 2022 

 
By: 
/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
 Kevin J. Cullum President and Chief Executive Officer of Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
 
8 

**
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8722]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Loan Repayment 2012.
    Date: May 2, 2012.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Bita Nakhai, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, Gateway 
Bldg., 2C212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-402-
7701, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5e303f35363f373c1e30373f7030373670393128"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="82ece3e9eae3ebe0c2ecebe3acecebeaace5edf4">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 5, 2012.
Anna Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-8722 Filed 4-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 

In connection with the accompanying Amended Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of OrgralTechnologies Corp. for the quarter ending February 28, 2006, I, Helen Heit,Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Orgral Technologies Corp.hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge andbelief, that:
| 1. |   | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending February 28, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| 2. |   | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending February 28, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Orgral Technologies Corp. |
|----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Dated: August 30, 2006 

Orgral Technologies Corp.

By: /s/ Helen Heit

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
#### Dr. P. Sidney NEUWIRTH v. SCL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP.

No. 86-C-2492.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 23, 1987.

In re SCL Limited Partnership; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-4354; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “E,” No. 83-19431.

Prior report: La.App., 499 So.2d 350.

Denied.

MARCUS, J. would grant the writ.
GPC Sanitized
SERVED: MARCH 19, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF TRANS NORTH AVIATION, LTD. FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0046
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as CaseNo. 2012-GL-03-0012) has been assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAAHearing Docket, and the otherpersons on-the attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W10001 ONE COPY 

### Charles R. 

### BarnettIII, Respondent's Counsel 

### Barnett & Borth, LLC 800 Waukegan Road, Suite 200 Glenview, IL 60025 TEL: 847-809-9520 FAX: 815-356-7042 Jeanette B. Daubaras, Complainant's Counsel 

### Office ofthe Regional Counsel, Great Lakes Region Federal Aviation Administration 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, AL 60018 TEL: 847-294-7313 FAX: 847-294-7498 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-004.6 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-