alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered June 25, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 00395 - CV CHRISTIN BISHOP, Appellant

V. CREDITPLEX AUTO SALE S L.L.C. D/B/A GREEN VILLE MITSUBISHI;

SANTANDER CONSUMER U SA, INC., Appellee s On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 13 - 01838 - D



### O RDER We GRANT appellant’s June 23, 2015 unopposed motion for second extension of time to file brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than July 3, 2015

. /s/ CRAI G STODDART JUSTICE
(logo)PNC

REALESTATE

 

MIDLANDLOAN SERVICES

 

ANNUALSTATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

of

PNCBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

d/b/aMIDLAND LOAN SERVICES

 

 

Pursuantto the requirements of the applicable Servicing Agreement for the transactionslisted on Schedule I hereto, the undersigned, David D. Spotts, as ExecutiveVice President of Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation, hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule Ihereto, as of the date hereof, solely in his capacity as an officer and not inhis individual capacity, as follows:

 

1.        Areview of the Servicer’s activities during the calendar year 2023 (the “ReportingPeriod”) and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been madeunder the undersigned officer’s supervision; and

2.        To thebest of the undersigned officer’s knowledge, based on such review, the Servicerhas fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

Dated:February 22, 2024

 

MidlandLoan Services, a division of

PNCBank, National Association

 

/s/David D. Spotts

DavidD. Spotts

ExecutiveVice President

 

 

**Memberof The PNC Financial Services Group**

10851Mastin Boulevard Overland Park, Kansas 66210

800-327-8083

www.pnc.com/midland

 

 

**Schedule I**

** **

**3650REIT Commercial Mortgage Securities II LLC**

| **Recipient  Role**                                                                                                                                                                | **Deal  Name**  | **Series  Number** | **Midland  Role** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|--------------------|-------------------|
| Depositor                                                                                                                                                                          | 3650R  2021-PF1 | Series  2021-PF1   | Master  Servicer  |
| Master  Servicer on The Westchester loan under the CSMC 2020-WEST TSA, the 520  Almanor loan under the BMARK 2021-B30 PSA, and the 2 Washington loan under  the BMARK 2021-B29 PSA |
| Special  Servicer on the One SOHO Square loan under the SOHO 2021-SOHO TSA and on The  Westchester Loan under the CSMC 2020-WEST TSA                                               |
| Depositor                                                                                                                                                                          | 3650R  2022-PF2 | Series  2022-PF2   | Master  Servicer  |
| Master  Servicer of the Concord Mills loan, the 330 West 34th Street Leased Fee loan  and the IPG Portfolio loan under the BMARK 2022-B37 PSA.                                     |
| Master  Servicer of the Patewood Corporate Center loan, the PetSmart HQ loan, and the  Icon One Daytona loan under the 3650R 2021-PF1 PSA.                                         |
Exhibit 32.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Solo Cup Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Susan H. Marks, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Susan H. Marks     
|Susan H. Marks         
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 12, 2005           



6
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 71 (Thursday, April 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 22003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8725]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Workforce Investment Act; Native American Employment and Training 
Council

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of 
Labor.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10 (a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (FACA) (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and Section 166 
(h)(4) of the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) [29 U.S.C. 2911(h)(4)], 
notice is hereby given of the next meeting of the Native American 
Employment and Training Council (Council), as constituted under WIA.

DATES: The meeting will begin at 1:30 p.m. (Eastern Time) on Thursday, 
April 26, 2012, and continue until 5 p.m. that day. The meeting will 
reconvene at 9 a.m. on Friday, April 27, 2012, and adjourn at 3 p.m. 
that day. The period from 2:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. on April 26, 2012, 
will be reserved for participation and presentations by members of the 
public.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Tunica-Biloxi Tribal Museum 
and Cultural Resources Center, 151 Melacon Drive, Marksville, Louisiana 
71351.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public. 
Members of the public not present may submit a written statement on or 
before April 18, 2012, to be included in the record of the meeting. 
Statements are to be submitted to Mrs. Evangeline M. Campbell, 
Designated Federal Official (DFO), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 
Constitution Avenue NW., Room S-4209, Washington, DC 20210. Persons who 
need special accommodations should contact Mr. Craig Lewis at (202) 
693-3384, at least two business days before the meeting. The formal 
agenda will focus on the following topics: (1) U.S. Department of Labor 
(DOL), Employment and Training Administration Update; (2) U.S. 
Department of Labor, Office of Public Engagement--Tribal Consultation 
Policy (TCP) Update; (3) DOL, Division of Indian and Native American 
Program Update; (4) Training and Technical Assistance; (5) Council 
Update; (6) Council Workgroup Reports; and (7) Council Recommendations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Evangeline M. Campbell, DFO, 
Division of Indian and Native American Programs, Employment and 
Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room S-4209, 200 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. Telephone number (202) 
693-3737 (VOICE) (this is not a toll-free number).

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of April, 2012.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-8725 Filed 4-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4501-FR-P
On-Board Circulation and Seating Subcommittee - January 2015 

On-board Circulation and Seating Subcommittee Call (#12)

01/15/2015

U.S. Access Board: Rail Vehicles Access Advisory Committee

Subcommittee for On-board Circulation and Seating

1. Introductions

1. Approval of the Agenda

2. Next Meeting

3. Review and discuss revisions to matrix

a. Note 3

b. Note 5

c. Note 6b.

d. Note 6d

e. Note 22

4. Review Vertical Circulation

5. Items we missed? Last call.

6. Next Step(s):

a. Draft report to the full committee: Volunteers?

7. Action Items

8. Assignments

[Attachment]
#### Commonwealth ex rel. Finlayson *v.*Finlayson, Appellant.

Argued March 21, 1962.

Before Rhodes, P. J., Ervin, Wright, Woodside, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ.

Before Boyle, J., without a jury.

*Herman*Eisenbcrg, for appellant.

*M. Stuart Goldin,*with him *Abe J. Goldin,*and *Goldin and Goldin,*for appellee.

April 12, 1962:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The order of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Boyle of the County Court of Philadelphia, as reported in 26 Pa. D. & C. 2d 546.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 66 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.66
                                        Agreed to April 24, 2001        

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and one

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. PRINTING OF REVISED VERSION OF ``WOMEN IN CONGRESS, 1917-
              1990''.

    An updated version of House Document 101-238, entitled ``Women in 
Congress, 1917-1990'' (as revised by the Library of Congress), shall be 
printed as a House document by the Public Printer, with illustrations 
and suitable binding, under the direction of the Committee on House 
Administration of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 2. NUMBER OF COPIES.

    In addition to the usual number, there shall be printed 30,700 
copies of the document referred to in section 1, of which--
        (1) 25,000 shall be for the use of the Committee on House 
    Administration of the House of Representatives; and
        (2) 5,700 shall be for the use of the Committee on Rules and 
    Administration of the Senate.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SWZ FINANCIAL II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and

TAX HELP MD INC., a Florida corporation

, Appellant s

,

v.

MILLER COFFEY TATE, LLP,

a Pennsylvania limited liability partnership

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 1532

[ April 1, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; James Nutt , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502016CA006382XXXXMB

.

Michael D. Moccia of the Law Office of Michael D. Moccia, P A, Boca

Raton, for appellants.

Bryan D. Hull and Kathleen L. DiSanto of Bush Ross, P.A., Tampa, for

appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, M AY and D AMOORGIAN , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 03/31/2010 01:58 PM

-----

|------------>

| From: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|"Gary Fromer" <Gary.Fromer@cpowered.com>

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| To: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Cc: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|"Tom Rutigliano" <Tom.Rutigliano@cpowered.com>

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Date: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|03/26/2010 05:41 PM

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Subject: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

|Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------|

Re: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708, National Emission Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

Dear Ms. King:

Please see attached, which is also being sent via FedEx for Monday delivery.

Thank you, and best regards.

Gary Fromer

Chief Executive Officer

CPower, Inc.

17 State St., 9th Floor

New York, NY 10004

T. 212-796-7101

M. 610-203-2657

E. gary.fromer@cpowered.com

www.cpowered.com

(See attached file: EPA Energy.pdf)
P.1 

OAR Box 1147 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

224) IV-E-98 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:59 PM Sheet 224 of 242 
P.2 

«*-« 

<jC*° ST<>* 

O* <3* 

W 

I \<m^1 g UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

\ -\M4r-•" WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

^ PRO*-0 

MAR 2 9 1993 

MEMORANDUM 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

SUBJECT: Opportunity For General Motors, Chyrsler and Ford Motor 

Companies Input on Onboard Vapor Recovery 

FROM: Dick Wilson, Directo 

Office of Mobile So 

TO: Public Docket A-87-11 

On January 22, 1993 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. 

Circuit issued an opinion causing EPA to reinstitute its 

rulemaking for onboard vapor recovery standards. In response, 

EPA has decided to prepare a Federal Register notice reopening 

the comment period and discussing the key issues and areas in the 

onboard vapor recovery NPRM and notice of August 1987 and 

September 1991, respectively. 

On March 10, 1993 I contacted Don Buist of Ford Motor 

Company. The purpose of my call was to offer Ford, General Motor 

and Chyrsler an opportunity to provide EPA input on what issues 

and areas should be addressed in the forthcoming notice. I 

stated that any input should be in writing and that in order for 

us to move expeditiously in developing the notice it must be 

received not later than March 19, 1993. 

Printed on Recycled Paper
|   | 1. | The      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| August      14, 2009 |   | /s/      Harvey W. Schiller |
|----------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
|                 |   | Name:                       | Harvey      W. Schiller |
|                 |   | Title:                      | Chairman      of the Board and |
|                 |   |                        | Chief      Executive Officer |
|                 |   |                        |  (Principal      Executive Officer) |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 105 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 105

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Congress should have the 
    power to prohibit desecration of the flag of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2001

 Mr. Stearns submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Congress should have the 
    power to prohibit desecration of the flag of the United States.

Whereas from Valley Forge to Yugoslavia, in every battlefield where American 
        values have been attacked and American lives sacrificed, the flag of the 
        United States has been a shining symbol of the Nation and of the 
        indomitable and eternal spirit of American liberty;
Whereas to desecrate such a symbol is to desecrate the memory of the thousands 
        of Americans who have sacrificed their lives to keep that banner flying, 
        intact, and inviolate; and
Whereas, since Americans have fought and died to defend the flag of the United 
        States, any act of desecration of the flag is profoundly offensive to 
        Americans: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) as a symbol of our Nation, the flag of the United 
        States deserves to be treated with respect of the highest 
        order; and
            (2) the Congress should have the power to prohibit the 
        desecration of the flag of the Unites States.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEPHEN YAGMAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

JOSEPH CURTIS EDMONDSON,

Defendant,

and

MICHAEL J. COLELLO,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 55384

D.C. No. 2:15

- cv

- 07210

- DSF

- SS

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 15 , 2018 **

Before: SILVERMAN , BEA , and WATFORD , Circuit Judges.

Michael J. Colello appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 18 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 55384

for attorney ’s fees. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for

an abuse of discretion

. Graham

– Sult v. Clainos , 756 F.3d 724, 75 1 (9th

Cir. 2014)

. We affirm

.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Colello’s motion

for attorney’s fees under Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.16(c) because Colello failed to

establish adequately the hours reasonably spent preparing the anti

- SLAPP motion

and a reasonable hourly rate for private attorneys in the community

. See Ketchum

v. Moses , 17 P.3d 735, 745 (Cal. 2001) (“A fee request that appears unreasonably

inflated is a special circumstance permitting the trial court to reduce the award or

deny one alt ogether.” (citation and intern al quotation marks omitted)).

AFFIRM ED.
Opinion issued April 22, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00220-CV

———————————

CHARLES EDWARDS AND MELANIE MALLEBRANCH, Appellants

V.

ALISA EDWARDS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 295th District Court of Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2012-16062

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Automation Wash, Ltd., has filed an appeal from the Order and 

Final Summary Judgment signed by the trial court on March 10, 2014. Although 

no motion to dismiss has been properly filed, appellants Charles Edwards and 

Melanie Mallebranche informed the Court by telephone they no longer wish to 

pursue the appeal. Further, the required fees have not been paid and appellants are 
2

not appealing as indigent. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE 

ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); Order Regarding Fees Charged 

in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the 

Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 

28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1). After being notified on 

March 31, 2014 that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not 

adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot and for want of prosecution for 

failure to pay fees. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). We dismiss any pending 

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown.