alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### WALKER BANK & TRUST COMPANY, a Utah banking corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Larry D. WALKER, and Joan H. Walker, Defendants and Respondents.

No. 17101.

Supreme Court of Utah.

May 20, 1981.

Suzanne West Murphy, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellant.

Dennis R. Mathews, Logan, for defendants and respondents.

HALL, Justice:

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the sums owing and delinquent on defendants' charge accounts. The District Court of Salt Lake County granted defendants' motion for a change of venue to Cache County and plaintiff appeals.

Defendants are residents of Cache County where they contracted in writing with plaintiff for the use of Walker Bank & Trust Visa and Master Charge cards. Pursuant to the terms of the contract, defendants' contract performance (payment) was due at the plaintiff's main office in Salt Lake City. Monthly billings were forwarded from that office and defendants re*861turned their payments in self-addressed envelopes provided by plaintiff.

Notwithstanding the general right it is to have an action tried in the county where the defendants or one of them resides, actions may be tried elsewhere when so provided by statute.1

The issue presented by this appeal is the subject of a specific statutory enactment which is dispositive. U.C.A., 1953, 78-13-4 provides as follows:

> When the defendant has contracted in writing to perform an obligation in a particular county of the state and resides in another county, an action on such contract obligation may be commenced and tried in the county where such obligation is to be performed or in which the defendant resides.

It is thus to be seen that plaintiff in this case had the option of suing defendants either in Salt Lake County where contract performance was due, or in Cache County where defendants reside. Having chosen the former, it did not lie within the prerogative of the trial court to compel the action to be tried in Cache County.2

Reversed and remanded for trial in Salt Lake County. Costs to plaintiff.

MAUGHAN, C. J., and STEWART, HOWE and OAKS, JJ., concur.

1

. Buckle v. Ogden Furniture & Carpet Co., 61 Utah 559, 216 P. 684 (1923).

2

. That the granting or denial of a motion is generally discretionary in the absence of a statutory provision to the contrary, see Olympia Sales Co. v. Long, Utah, 604 P.2d 919 (1979).
Beacon 520SD, Beacon 520SDX

Complex strontium aluminate, rare earth doped
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 67 (Friday, April 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8333]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel Review; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following 
meeting:

    Name: U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel Review, 
<greek-i>76826.
    Date/Time: April 20, 2012.
    Open Session: 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Closed Session: 4 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
1235, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Partially Open.
    Contact Person: Sue LaFratta, Office of Polar Programs (OPP). 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 
22230. (703) 292-8030.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: The Panel will conduct an independent review 
of the current U.S. Antarctic Program to ensure the nation is 
pursuing the best twenty-year trajectory for conducting science and 
diplomacy in Antarctica--one that is environmentally sound, safe, 
innovative, affordable, sustainable, and consistent with the 
Antarctic Treaty.
    Agenda: Present the Panel with additional programmatic 
information related to opportunities and challenges for Antarctic 
research and research support; discussion of findings and 
recommendations; planning for final report.
    Reason for Closing: One session of the meeting is closed to the 
public because the Committee will review and discuss confidential 
commercial information and/or privileged intellectual property that 
if disclosed could harm the commercial interest of a submitter. The 
panel discussion could lead to premature disclosure of information 
that could significantly frustrate the Agency's implementation of 
proposed actions. Therefore this session is properly closed under 
exemptions 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (9)(B) of the Government in the 
Sunshine Act.

     Dated: April 3, 2012.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-8333 Filed 4-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Exhibit
32.1





TOT
Energy, Inc.


12100 NE
16 Ave; Suite 210


North
Miami, FL 33161





August 10,
2010





Securities
and Exchange Commission


100 F
Street, NE


Washington,
DC 20549





Re:
Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350





Dear
Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TOT Energy,
Inc., for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, each of the undersigned hereby
certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), to the
undersigned’s knowledge that:




1.
            such Quarterly Report on Form
      10-Q of TOT Energy, Inc., for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
            the information contained in such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TOT Energy, Inc., for the quarter ended
      June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of TOT Energy,
    Inc.





BY: /S/ Mike ZoiMike
      ZoiChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)BY: /S/ Jonathan NewJonathan
      NewChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to TOT Energy, Inc. and will be
retained by TOT Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.





In
accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K, this certification is
being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.1 to TOT Energy, Inc.’s quarterly report
and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the
liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in
any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as
expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
391 A.2d 700

#### Commonwealth v. Springman, Appellant.

*634Submitted March 30, 1977.

Charles J. Tague, Assistant Public Defender, and Gregory V. Smith, Chief Public Defender, for appellant; Robert F. Banks, First Assistant District Attorney, and William S. Kieser, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  November 14, 2008
    /s/ Robert K. MoskovitzName:
    Robert K. MoskovitzTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner
Exhibit 10.5



 


 


 


 


LOAN CONFIRMATION 



February 10, 2022


 


 


Dear MEDIES,


 


 


THIS IS A REQUEST FOR CONFIRMATION OF YOUR
ACCOUNT WITH MR. KENNETH TINDALL, THAT IS READ AS FOLLOWS:


 


 


The amount outstanding as a loan payable by MEDIES
to Mr. Kenneth Tindall as of February 10, 2022 is $40,311. This loan is unsecured, interest-free, and is payable upon demand, but not within two years from the date
of this letter. This loan was advanced to support the Company’s development stage business activities.


 


If this amount payable to you is correct as
it appears in MEDIES’ books, please confirm it by signing this letter at the space provided below.


 


 


I HEREBY AGREE, THAT THE BALANCE SHOWN HEREWITH
IS CORRECT:


 


 


Name and Designation of the company representative:


 


Kenneth Tindall, Chief Executive Officer/Chief
Financial Officer


MEDIES (a Wyoming
Company)


 


 


 


Signature: /s/ Kenneth Tindall


 


 


Date:      February 10, 2022
Ms. Joyce Fpps. I)irectorDepartment of Environmental ProtectionBureau of Air QualityRachel Carson Building400 Market Street, P.O. Box 8468Harrisburg, PA 17105-8468

June 22, 2010

Rev. Ricky V. Burgess

Donald S. Burke, M.D.

Hon. Joan Cleary, R.N.

James M. Flynn, Jr.

Lidia C. Turzai, M.D.

William Youngblood

Dear Ms. Epps:

Enclosed are two paper copies and a disk containing a pdf version of a revision to Allegheny County’s portion

of the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan for the Attainment and Maintenance of the 8-Hour OzoneNational Ambient Air Quality Standards. Changes made to Article XXI, Air Pollution Control Rules andRegulations, and County Ordinance 16782 are related to regulations incorporating CTGs for Large Appliance

and Metal Furniture Surface Coating Processes, Flat Wood Paneling Coating Process, and Paper, Film, and FoilSurface Coating Processes -Sections 2105.77, 2105.78, and 2105.79 respectively as well as related definitionsin Section 2101.20 and existing Surface Coating Processes regulations at Section 2105.10. This SIP revision is

being tracked as our internal Revision 65.

This SIP Revision was the subject of a public comment period from October 19, 2009 until November 20, 2009

the date of the public hearing. It was approved by the Board of Health on March 10, 2010, enacted by CountyCouncil on May 4, 2010, approved and signed by the Allegheny County Chief Executive on May 14, 2010, andbecame effective May 24, 2010.We request that the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection approve this revision and forward thehard copies and disk to the U.S. EPA Region ifi with a recommendation for approval.Copies of this submittal have also been sent to your Region V Pittsburgh Office. If you have any questions,please call me at the number above or email me atjthompson@achd.net.

cc: Arleen Shulman

Stephen Hepler

Enclosures

I — inr flIDZ

Sincere!

James Thompson, ManagerAir Quality Program

25-093008
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 90

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the printing of a revised and updated

version of the House document entitled ‘‘Hispanic Americans in Congress’’.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 90

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

•HCON 90 EH

1 SECTION 1. PRINTING OF REVISED VERSION OF ‘‘HISPANIC

2 AMERICANS IN CONGRESS’’.

3 An updated version of House Document 103–299, en4 titled ‘‘Hispanic Americans in Congress’’ (as revised by

5 the Library of Congress), shall be printed as a House doc6 ument by the Public Printer, with illustrations and suit7 able binding, under the direction of the Committee on

8 House Administration of the House of Representatives.

9 SEC. 2. NUMBER OF COPIES.

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection

11 (b), in addition to the usual number, there shall be printed

12 30,700 copies of the document referred to in section 1,

13 of which—

14 (1) 25,000 shall be for the use of the Com15 mittee on House Administration of the House of

16 Representatives; and

17 (2) 5,700 shall be for the use of the Committee

18 on Rules and Administration of the Senate.

19 (b) ALTERNATIVE NUMBER.—If the total printing

20 and production costs of the number of copies provided

21 under subsection (a) exceed $220,000, there shall be

22 printed the maximum number of copies of the document

23 referred to in section 1 for which such total costs do not
3

•HCON 90 EH

1 exceed $220,000, with distribution allocated in the same

2 proportion as in subsection (a).

Passed the House of Representatives October 9,

2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

LUIS MANUEL BARRAGANCAMARENA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-50329

D.C. No. 3:10-cr-00913-L

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

M. James Lorenz, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Luis Manuel Barragan-Camarena appeals from his 10-month sentenced

imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted entry after deportation,

FILED

NOV 01 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-50329

in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

we affirm. 

Barragan-Camarena contends that the district court procedurally erred by

failing to calculate the Sentencing Guidelines range, failing adequately to explain

the sentence, incorrectly adopting certain Sentencing Guidelines departures, and

relying on erroneous factual findings. These contentions are belied by the record. 

The district court did not procedurally err. Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 49-

51 (2007). 

Barragan-Camarena also contends that the district court abused its discretion

when it increased his sentence based on conduct related to a dismissed charge. The

district court did not abuse its discretion when it relied on Barragan-Camarena’s

fraudulent use of an entry document to increase his sentence. See 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3553(a)(1) (instructing courts to consider the nature and circumstances of the

offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant); United States v.

Barragan-Espinoza, 350 F.3d 978, 983 (9th Cir. 2003) (recognizing that United

States v. Lawton, 193 F.3d 1087 (9th Cir. 1999) has been superceded, and holding

that sentencing courts may consider aggravating conduct that is dismissed).

Finally, Barragan-Camarena contends that the ten-month sentence was

substantively unreasonable because it was higher than necessary in light of the
3 10-50329

circumstances, including his allegedly minimal criminal history and the need for

deterrence and protection of the public. Given the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3553(a) and the totality of the circumstances, the sentence is not substantively

unreasonable. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 41, 56-58. 

AFFIRMED.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other
financial information included in this report fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and

procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial
reporting.
  By:/s/ John EmeryJohn EmeryChief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21762-21763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8692]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER12-1432-000]

ReEnergy Livermore Falls LLC; Supplemental Notice That Revised 
Market-Based Rate Tariff Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 
204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
ReEnergy Livermore Falls LLC's tariff revision filing, noting that such 
filing includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 
34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is April 25, 2012.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the

[[Page 21763]]

Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the 
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email [email protected]. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: April 5, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8692 Filed 4-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended
June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By: /s/ John Emery

John EmeryChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)
United States Agricultural 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Agricultural Department of Marketing Room 2642-S, Mail Stop 0268

Marketing Agriculture Service Washington, D.C. 20250-0268

Service

May 2, 2019

TO: USDA-Accredited Certifying Agents 

FROM: Jennifer Tucker, Ph.D.

Deputy Administrator

National Organic Program (NOP)

SUBJECT: Organic Integrity Learning Center Launch

To support the ongoing development of personnel working in organic certification and 

compliance and enforcement roles, the National Organic Program (NOP) has launched the 

Organic Integrity Learning Center. The Learning Center is a formal Learning Management 

System, that supports the professional development and continuing education of professionals 

working to protect organic integrity.

Well-qualified and trained certifier staff, including inspectors, and reviewers are critical to 

maintaining organic integrity. These professionals stand at the center of effective organic control 

systems, and directly impact fair and consistent organic certification around the world.

Certifiers are responsible for communicating the availability of the Learning Center to 

their staff, including in-house and contracted inspectors and reviewers. To track individual 

training records, all Learning Center users must have unique accounts and passwords. In April 

2019, NOP registered the lead and secondary contacts for all NOP certifiers; we are providing 

this information to certifiers with a link to this memo.

The flyer How to Sign Up for an Account (pdf) provides instructions for group sign-up if you 

wish to register a group of people. You can also instruct your team and your contracted 

inspectors to request individual accounts using instructions in the flyer. People with accounts can

access the Learning Center at: usda.blackboard.com/.

Examples of current courses in the Learning Center include: Fundamentals of Inspections,

Import Oversight Essentials, Compliance and Enforcement, Sound and Sensible Certification, 

and Introduction to the USDA Organic System. New courses will be added on a regular basis.

Upcoming courses will include Dairy Compliance, Materials Review, Certification 

Administration, and Residue Sampling and Testing.

The Organic Integrity Learning Center was launched to help organic professionals protect 

organic integrity and provide fair and consistent organic certification around the world. Certifier 

leadership will play a critical role in ensuring their teams access and use this new resource.