alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 24, 2015

No. 04-15-00306-CV

Cynthia L. BARKMAN and Charles N. Barkman,

Appellants

v.

USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CV01936

Honorable Jason Wolff, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due on August 5, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). To date, 

Appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time to file the brief. See id. R. 

38.6(d). 

Therefore, we ORDER Appellant to show cause in writing within TEN DAYS from the 

date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See id.

R. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), (c).

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of August, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

State Farm Mutual Automobile : Insurance Company, :

Petitioner :

:

v. :

: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, : Insurance Department, Theresa D. : Miller, Acting Insurance Commissioner, : Respondents : No. 167 C.D. 2015

O R D E R

NOW, November 16, 2015

, having considered intervenor’s “motion for

rehearing and or en banc panel review”

, the motion is denied.

_____________________________ DAN PELLEGRINI,

President Judge
REVISED ENGINEERING REPORT WHICH INCORPORATES INFORMATION IN LETTER 

DATED AUGUST 9, 2002,

REVISIONS ARE SHOWN IN BOLD TYPE

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 02-0659 ENGINEER: Arnold/MAM 

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: Crompton Corportion 

MSDS: Yes Label: No 

General Eqp.: 4H, Butyl, Neoprene, Nitrile, or PVC-coated 

gloves/safety glasses/local exhaust 

ventilation 

Respirator: If personnel exposure exceeds the exposure 

limits, select appropriate protective equipment 

in accordance with NIOSH recommendations. 

Health Effects: slightly toxic/irritant to 

skin/eyes/lungs/mucous membrane 

TLV/PEL (PMN or raw materials): (Sn) 0.1 mg/m3 TWA 

CRSS: 

Chemical Category: Stannane, 

dimethylbis[[(9Z)-1-oxo-9-octadecenyl]ox

y]- 

VP: <1E-06 torr @25C 

S-H2O: <1E-04 g/L 

MW: 711.69 

Phys State: Neat: Liquid; Mfg: Liquid; Proc/Form: NA; 

End Use: Liquid 

Consumer Use: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 8EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 8
 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 2 

PMN: 02-0659 

SAT (concerns): 

Ground Water: Migration to ground water = negl 

Health: 2-3; Dermal, inhalation 

Eco: 3; All releases to surface waters 

PBT: PMN P1B2T2; Sn P3B2T2 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1-2 

ASSUMPTIONS: 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: None listed 

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 8EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 8
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 3 

PMN: 02-0659 

MFG: 

Site/Location

Days/yr:

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES (Eqpt. cleaning, container residue, etc.): 

 

rom: 

to: 

basis:

OR 

from: 

basis:

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 8EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 8
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 4 

PMN: 02-0659 

MFG:(cont.) 

basis: 

 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE 

 Tot. # of workers: 

 Days/yr: 

Inhalation: 

Dermal: 

 

Basis: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 8EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 8
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 5 

PMN: 02-0659 

PROC/USE: 

Site/Location: 

Days/yr: 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES (Eqpt. cleaning, container residue, etc.): 

: 

from: 

to: 

basis: 

 

 

OR 

 

from: 

basis: 

 ) 

 

 

AND/OR 

 

from: 

basis: 

 d 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 8EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 8
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 8EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 8
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT Page # 7 

PMN: 02-0659 

PROC/USE: (cont.) 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE 

 Tot. # of workers: 

 Days/yr: 

Inhalation: 

Dermal 

 

Basis

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 8EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 8
 CONTACT REPORT 

(Telephone Log) 

PMN: 02-0659 

Call By: Monaca McNall (Eastern Research Group for 

EPA/OPPT/CEB) 

Call To: 

Submitter: Crompton Corp. 

Date: 05/28/02 

Time: 1:30 pm 

Q1: 

A1: 

Q2: 

A2: 

Q3: 

A3: 

Q4: 

A4: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 8EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 8
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Owl Rock Technology Finance Corp. II (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

 

1) the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2) the information contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

|                      |        |        |                                                     |
|----------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
| Date: March 16, 2022 |   | By:    | /s/ Jonathan Lamm                                   |
|                 |   |   | Jonathan Lamm                                       |
|                 |   |   | Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 35.1  LOGO Bridgecrest Credit Company OFFICERS CERTIFICATE The
undersigned hereby certifies that he is a duly authorized officer of Bridgecrest Credit Company (the Servicer), and that as such he is authorized to execute and deliver this certificate in the name and on behalf of Bridgecrest Credit
Company, and certifies that:  1.
I have reviewed the activities of the Servicer during the period December 29, 2021 through
December 31, 2021 and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement; and  2.
to the best of my knowledge, based on such review and other than described herein, the Servicer has
substantially fulfilled all its obligations under the Servicing Agreement for the above referenced period. This certificate is
delivered in accordance with Section 2.9 of the Carvana Auto Receivables 2021-P4 Servicing Agreement dated as of December 29, 2021, among Carvana Auto Receivables Trust
2021-P4, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Bridgecrest Credit Company. This certificate is dated as of December 31, 2021.  By:

/s/ Daniel GaudreauDaniel GaudreauChief Financial Officer
300 E. Rio Salado Pkwy.  Bldg 1 Tempe, AZ 85281 Office: 602.852.6604 Exhibit 33.4 Management’s Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria 1. Carvana, LLC ( “Carvana”), as sponsor and administrator, is responsible for assessing compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria (defined below) as of December 31, 2022, and for the year ended December 31, 2022 (the “Reporting Period”). The transactions covered by this report consist of all publicly-registered asset-backed securities transactions for which Carvana acted as sponsor and administrator involving a pool of fixed rate retail installment contracts used to finance the purchase of used cars and light trucks (the “Platform”). The asset-backed securities transactions included in the Platform are set forth in Appendix A hereto. 2. Carvana used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess its compliance with the following servicing criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB (collectively, the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”): (1)(i), (1)(iii), (3)(i)(C), and (d)(4)(iii). All other servicing criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB are inapplicable to Carvana based on the activities it performs with respect to the Platform. 4. Carvana has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2022, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole. 5. Grant Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on Carvana’s assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2022, and for the Reporting Period. March 29, 2023 Carvana, LLC By: Name: Paul W. Breaux Title: Vice President, Secretary /s/ Paul W. Breaux
 2  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2020-P1  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N1  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P1  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N2  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P2  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N3  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P3  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-N4  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P4  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-P1  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-P2  Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022-P3  Appendix A
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 610 

Urging the release of information regarding the September 11, 2001, terrorist 

attacks upon the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 21, 2018 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. SCHUMER, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. MURPHY, and Mr. MENENDEZ) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Urging the release of information regarding the September 

11, 2001, terrorist attacks upon the United States. 

Whereas tens of thousands of pages of documents relating to 

the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks upon the 

United States remain classified by the Federal Government; 

Whereas the Federal Government may properly classify and 

control access to information in order to protect sources 

and methods of collecting critical information in defense 

of the country and the people of the United States; 

Whereas the contents of these documents are necessary for 

a full public understanding of the events and cirVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:20 Aug 21, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\SR610.IS SR610

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 610 IS 

cumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks; 

Whereas the decision to maintain the classified status of 

many of these documents prevents the people of the 

United States from having access to information about 

the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, including the 

involvement of certain foreign governments in the attacks; and 

Whereas the people of the United States and the families of 

the victims of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks 

deserve full and public disclosure of the events surrounding the attacks: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that— 

2 (1) documents related to the events of Sep3 tember 11, 2001, should be declassified to the great4 est extent possible; and 

5 (2) the survivors, the families of the victims, 

6 and the people of the United States deserve answers 

7 about the events and circumstances surrounding the 

8 September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks upon the 

9 United States. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 68 (Monday, April 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21145-21146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8453]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending March 3, 2012

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2012-0032.
    Date Filed: March 3, 2012.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: March 23, 2012.
    Description: Application of All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd. (``ANA'') 
requesting an exemption and an amended foreign air carrier permit ANA 
to operate the following services: (i) Scheduled foreign air 
transportation of persons, property, and mail (separately or in 
combination) from points behind Japan via Japan and intermediate points 
to a point or points in the United States and beyond; (ii) charter 
foreign air transportation of persons, property, and

[[Page 21146]]

mail (separately or in combination) between any point or points in 
Japan and any point or points in the United States and between any 
point or points in the United States and any point or points in any 
third country; and, (iii) other charters.

Renee V. Wright,
 Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2012-8453 Filed 4-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed December 10, 2014.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-909

Lower Tribunal No. 09-41553

________________

Carieann M. Schmieder,

Appellant,

vs.

NCL America, Inc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Stanford Blake,

Judge.

Lipcon, Margulies, Alsina & Winkleman, and Michael A. Winkleman and

Jacqueline Garcell, for appellant.

McAlpin Conroy, and Richard J. McAlpin and Kassandra C. Doyle, for

appellee.

Before SHEPHERD, C.J., and ROTHENBERG and EMAS, JJ.

SHEPHERD, C.J.
Carieann M. Schmieder appeals from orders dismissing her negligence claim

for fraud on the court and a final judgment awarding NCL America, Inc.,

attorney’s fees and costs. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the order

dismissing Ms. Schmieder’s claim. NCL America, Inc., however, has conceded

error in the award of attorney’s fees and costs predicated upon section 768.79,

Florida Statutes (2013), which this Court has ruled inapplicable in admiralty cases. 

See Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Cox, 137 So. 3d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014),

rev. dismissed, 145 So. 3d 822 (Fla. 2014).1 Accordingly, we reverse the judgment

awarding attorney’s fees and remand the award of costs to the trial court for

reconsideration.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded.

1 The trial court did not have the benefit of this Court’s holding in Cox.

2
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of INverso Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bonnie Hartman, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November
      23, 2009
              /s/  Bonnie
      L. HartmanBy:  Bonnie
      L. HartmanIts:  Chief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
INverso Corp. and will be retained by INverso Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8650]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bishop Hill Interconnection LLC........  EG12-24-000.
Tenaska Washington Partners, L.P.......  EG12-25-000.
Pattern Santa Isabel LLC...............  EG12-26-000.
Mariposa Energy, LLC...................  EG12-27-000.
Blue Summit Wind, LLC..................  EG12-28-000.
CPV Sentinel, LLC......................  EG12-29-000.
Spring Valley Wind LLC.................  EG12-30-000.
Dynegy Midwest Generation, LLC.........  EG00-235-000.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that during the month of March 2012, the status of the 
above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators became 
effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 
366.7(a).

    Dated: April 4, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8650 Filed 4-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
To:

Cc:

Bcc:

Subject: Fw: IQRs used in Sarnat et al. 2008 (EHP)

From: "Sarnat, Jeremy" <jsarnat@emory.edu>

To: Tom Luben/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/29/2011 10:02 AM

Subject: RE: IQRs used in Sarnat et al. 2008 (EHP)

Tom - Here you go. Pay attention to the column with the IQ_Range heading. EC is row 9. Let me 

know if anything is unclear.

Jeremy

From: Tom Luben [mailto:Luben.Tom@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 9:22 AM

To: Sarnat, Jeremy

Subject: IQRs used in Sarnat et al. 2008 (EHP)

Hi Jeremy, 

I am currently working on the benefits of mitigating black carbon. 

I would like to include the results for CVD and respiratory ED 

visits associated with PM2.5-EC from your 2008 paper in EHP (Fine particle sources and cardiorespiratory 

morbidity: an application of chemical mass balance and factor analytical source-apportionment methods [

Sarnat et al. (2008) in EHP vol 116 (4): 459-466]). Specifically, I am interested in the results in Figures 2 

and 3 in the paper (Tables 5 and 6 in the Supplemental Material). The titles for these Figures and Tables 

indicate that the risk ratios are per IQR increase. I've been looking through the paper and the 

supplemental material, and I haven't been able to find the IQR for PM2.5-EC (or the other pollutants). I 

noticed that the 10th and 90th percentiles are provided in Table 2, but not the IQR. Maybe I've missed 

them somewhere? Could you point me to where the IQRs are in the paper, or send me the IQRs for these 

risk ratios?

Thank you, 

Tom

Tom Luben, Ph.D., MSPH

Senior Epidemiologist

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

National Center for Environmental Assessment 

Telephone: 919-541-5762

E-mail: luben.tom@epa.gov 
IQR_data

ORDERAQ VARNAME IQ_RANGE IQ_RANGE_S STANDARD

1 DIESEL_PMF 2.328761357 2.328761357 1

2 GAS_PMF 1.233978095 1.233978095 1

3 DIESGAS_PMF 3.342523675 1.671261838 2

4 DIESEL_CMB 1.26 1.26 1

5 GAS_CMB 0.95 0.95 1

6 DIESGAS_CMB 2.05 1.025 2

7 DIESGAS_ZN 0.010725842 1.0725842 0.01

8 DIESGAS_FE 0.061356082 1.227121636 0.05

9 EC 1.255461802 1.255461802 1

10 OC 2.726102972 1.363051486 2

11 PM25D 11.375 1.1375 10

12 SOIL_PMF 0.476126472 1.19031618 0.4

13 SOIL_CMB 0.28 0.7 0.4

14 SOIL_SI 0.07679743 0.767974299 0.1

15 SOIL_CP 6.12794233 1.225588466 5

16 WOOD_PMF 0.959526341 1.199407926 0.8

17 WOOD_CMB 0.73 0.9125 0.8

18 WOOD_K 0.042969109 0.716151818 0.06

19 WOOD_CL 0.077830764 0.97288455 0.08

20 AMSULF_PMF 5.776407833 1.155281567 5

21 AMSULF_CMB 5.21 1.042 5

22 AMBSLF_CMB 0.2 0.2 1

23 SO4P1 3.917685038 0.783537008 5

24 SULFATE2_PMF 1.312083648 2.18680608 0.6

25 AMNITR_PMF 0.91441847 0.91441847 1

26 AMNITR_CMB 1.25 1.25 1

27 AMNITR_NO3 0.863874001 0.863874001 1

28 PWRPLNT_CMB 0.13 1.3 0.1

29 PWRPLNT_SE 0.001532782 1.532782 0.001

30 PWRPLNT_SO2 17.69039154 0.884519577 20

31 CEMENT_PMF 0.332910112 1.109700373 0.3

32 OTHROC_CMB 1.79 0.895 2

33 BUSHIGHWAY_PMF 0.112405031 0.224810062 0.5

34 RAILROD_PMF 0.506583662 2.53291831 0.2

35 METALPROC_PMF 0.817597868 1.362663113 0.6

IQR_data Page 1
Second Amendment to the Hub and Line-Haul Services Agreement


 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 August 8, 2005 
  
 VIA FACSIMILE AND DHL EXPRESS 
  
 DHL Express (USA), Inc. 
 1200 South Pine Island Road 
 Plantation, FL 33324 

	Attn:	Jon Olin 


	    	Senior Vice President 


	    	General Counsel & Secretary 

  

	 	Re:	Second Amendment to the Hub and Line-Haul Services Agreement, by and between DHL Express (USA), Inc. (“Groundco”) and ABX Air, Inc. (“Airco”), dated August 15,
2003 (the “Hub Services Agreement”). 

  
 Dear Jon:

  
 This letter is intended to confirm the agreement between
Groundco and Airco to amend the Hub Services Agreement in order to accommodate the requirements of each other. 
  
 Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Hub Services Agreement. 
  
 The Hub Services Agreement is hereby amended, modified and/or confirmed as
follows: 
  
 (a) Section 5.2 of the Hub Services Agreement is
hereby amended to provide as follows: 
  
 5.2
With respect to Section 5.2 of the Hub Services Agreement, solely during the period from July 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005, the maximum Base Markup that Airco can charge Groundco under the Hub Services Agreement shall be decreased from 1.75% to
1.25%. 
  
 (b) Section 5.4 of the Hub Services Agreement is hereby
amended to provide as follows: 
  
 5.4 With
respect to Section 5.4 of the Hub Services Agreement, solely during the period from July 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005, the maximum incremental mark-up that ABX Air can earn from the quarterly cost-related incentives under the Hub Services Agreement
shall be increased from 25% to 48.15%. 






 Jon Olin 
 August 8, 2005

 2 of 2 
  
 (c) Section 9.1 of the Hub Services Agreement is hereby amended to provide as follows: 
  
 With respect to Section 9.1, in the first sentence, delete the phrase, “three (3)” and in lieu thereof, substitute
the phrase, “four (4)”; to extend the original term of the Hub Services Agreement by one (1) additional year. 
  
 Except as amended or modified by this letter, the terms and conditions of the Hub Services Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
  
 Please acknowledge Groundco’s acceptance of the foregoing by signing and
dating both counterparts of this letter of amendment and returning one counterpart to me for my records. 
  

	
	 Sincerely,

	
	 ABX Air, Inc.

	
	 /s/ Joseph C. Hete

	 Joseph C. Hete

	 President & Chief Executive Officer



  

			
	 ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

	
	 DHL Express (USA), Inc.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Jon Olin

	 	 	 Jon Olin

	 	 	 Senior Vice President

	 	 	 General Secretary & Counsel

		
	 Date:
	 	 August 8, 2005