alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 POLYPORE, INC. CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Polypore, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended April 2, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), Lynn Amos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. May 16, 2005
    
    
    
    /s/ Lynn AmosLynn AmosChief Financial OfficerPolypore, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 254 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 254

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Encouraging the people of the United States to celebrate the 300th 
    anniversary of William Penn's Charter of Privileges, the 250th 
anniversary of the Liberty Bell, and the 225th anniversary of the first 
           public reading of the Declaration of Independence.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 254

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas William Penn was a distinguished statesman and a principled defender of 
        human rights and religious liberties;
Whereas in 1701, William Penn wrote Charter of Privileges, which set a new 
        standard for religious liberty that profoundly impacted the Nation's 
        history and still provides an example for the world today;
Whereas religious freedom is still one of the most fragile liberties, and today, 
        millions of people around the world are persecuted for their religious 
        beliefs;
Whereas the year 2001 marks the 300th anniversary of the publication of Charter 
        of Privileges;
Whereas the Liberty Bell was designed to commemorate the 50th anniversary of 
        Charter of Privileges and is a powerful reminder of the Nation's 
        commitment to freedom and justice;
Whereas the Liberty Bell became a defining symbol of the abolitionist movement, 
        which sought to rid the Nation of slavery;
Whereas the year 2001 marks the 250th anniversary of the completion of the 
        Liberty Bell; and
Whereas the year 2001 is also the 225th anniversary of the first public reading 
        of the Declaration of Independence, which contains the immortal phrase: 
        ``We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created 
        equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable 
        Rights'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) encourages the people of the United States to celebrate 
        the 300th anniversary of William Penn's Charter of Privileges, 
        the 250th anniversary of the Liberty Bell, and the 225th 
        anniversary of the first public reading of the Declaration of 
        Independence; and
            (2) encourages the Nation's leaders to reaffirm their 
        commitment to promoting human rights and religious freedom in 
        the Nation and around the world.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 13, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Agricultural Marketing Service, Commodity Procurement Staff

1400 Independence Ave., SW, Room 3522-S, STOP 0239

Washington, DC 20250-0239

Voice 202.720.4517 Fax 202.720.5871

An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

DATE: April 30, 2015

USDA APPLE PRODUCTS PURCHASE PROGRAM ANNOUNCED:

The U.S. Department of Agriculture today announced plans to purchase Fresh Apples and 

Processed Apple Products for surplus removal.

An Invitation for Bid (solicitation) will be issued in the near future for deliveries August through

December, 2015. All offers must be submitted electronically through the Web-Based Supply 

Chain Management (WBSCM) website at

http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?navid=WBSCM. Offers submitted by any

means other than WBSCM will be considered non-responsive.

Offerors are urged to review all documents as they pertain to this program, including the AMS

Master Solicitation for Commodity Procurements, dated April 2015; any applicable Commodity 

Specification identified in the subsequent solicitation(s); and the Qualification Requirements for 

Prospective Vendors, dated October 2014. These documents are available on the AMS 

Commodity Procurement website at www.ams.usda.gov/commoditypurchasing.

Offerors must read all terms of the applicable Solicitation(s) when it is issued. To receive 

electronic (e-mail) notification of the issuance of these solicitations, see the “Subscribe to AMS 

CP News (link)” available on the AMS Commodity Procurement website. 

Inquiries may be made by telephoning (202) 720-4517 or addressing the Contracting Officer, 

USDA/AMS Commodity Procurement Staff, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, STOP 0239, 

Washington, DC 20250-0256. An electronic version of this Purchase Announcement can be 

found at the Commodity Procurement Website: http://www.ams.usda.gov/commoditypurchasing.

The USDA prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national 

origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental 

status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic 

information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to 

all programs and/or employment activities.) To file a complaint of discrimination, write: USDA, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil 

Rights, Office of Adjudication, 1400 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (866) 632-9992 (Toll-free Customer 

Service), (800) 877-8339 (Local or Federal relay), (866) 377-8642 (Relay voice users). 

Together We’re Making a Difference: American Agriculture for the American People
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">U.S. Equities Corp., Plaintiff-Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>Melaneo J. Brito, Defendant-Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Sabrina B. Kraus, J.), entered June 25, 2019, which granted defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment to the extent of setting the matter down for a traverse hearing.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Appeal from order (Sabrina B. Kraus, J.), entered June 25, 2019, dismissed, without costs and without prejudice.</p><p>The underlying order is not appealable because it does not recite the papers used on the motion (<i>see</i> CPLR 2219[a]; <i>Arena v City of New York</i>, 23 AD2d 847 [1965]). In fact the words "foregoing cited papers" are crossed out in the order and replaced with the word "annexed", without specification of what papers the court considered. Our disposition is without prejudice to plaintiff moving in Civil Court for resettlement of the order to reflect the papers considered (<i>see Matter of Stonchius</i>, 209 AD2d 705 [1994]) and to appeal the resettled order.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur <br>Decision Date: December 26, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 76 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 76

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

   Authorizing the use of the East Front of the Capitol Grounds for 
performances sponsored by the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing 
                                 Arts.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 76

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING USE OF EAST FRONT OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR 
              PERFORMANCES SPONSORED BY KENNEDY CENTER.

    In carrying out its duties under section 4 of the John F. Kennedy 
Center Act (20 U.S.C. 76j), the John F. Kennedy Center for the 
Performing Arts, in cooperation with the National Park Service (in this 
resolution jointly referred to as the ``sponsor''), may sponsor public 
performances on the East Front of the Capitol Grounds at such dates and 
times as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and Committee on 
Rules and Administration of the Senate may approve jointly.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Any performance authorized under section 1 shall 
be free of admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere 
with the needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the 
Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board.
    (b) Assumption of Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all liabilities incident to all activities 
associated with the performance.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    (a) Structures and Equipment.--In consultation with the Speaker of 
the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and 
Administration of the Senate, the Architect of the Capitol shall 
provide upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, sound amplification 
devices, and other related structures and equipment as may be required 
for a performance authorized under section 1.
    (b) Additional Arrangements.--The Architect of the Capitol and the 
Capitol Police Board may make such additional arrangements as may be 
required to carry out the performance.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946 (40 
U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, advertisements, displays, 
and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions 
applicable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to a performance 
authorized by section 1.

SEC. 5. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.

    A performance may not be conducted under this resolution after 
September 30, 2001.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 87

Authorizing the 2001 District of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement

Torch Run to be run through the Capitol Grounds.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 27, 2001

Mr. LATOURETTE (for himself and Mr. COSTELLO) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the 2001 District of Columbia Special Olympics

Law Enforcement Torch Run to be run through the

Capitol Grounds.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF D.C. SPECIAL

4 OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN

5 THROUGH CAPITOL GROUNDS.

6 On June 1, 2001, or on such other date as the Speak7 er of the House of Representatives and the Committee on

8 Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly des9 ignate, the 2001 District of Columbia Special Olympics
2

•HCON 87 IH

1 Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred

2 to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through the Capitol

3 Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics

4 torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics sum5 mer games at Gallaudet University in the District of Co6 lumbia.

7 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

8 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as

9 may be necessary to carry out the event.

10 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA11 TIONS.

12 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions

13 for physical preparations for the event.

14 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

15 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce16 ment of the restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act

17 of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), con18 cerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations

19 on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions appli20 cable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.

Æ
EXHIBIT 31.1








RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) CERTIFICATION (SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)











I, Andrew J. McMonigle, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2022-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.








Date: May 26, 2023








/s/ Andrew J. McMonigle


Name: Andrew J. McMonigle


Title: Vice President and Treasurer


(Senior officer in charge of securitization)


Company: CarMax Auto Funding LLC


as Depositor on behalf of CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2022-1
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 696 

Permitting the collection of clothing, toys, food, and housewares during the 

holiday season for charitable purposes in Senate buildings. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2018 

Mr. ISAKSON (for himself and Mr. TESTER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Permitting the collection of clothing, toys, food, and 

housewares during the holiday season for charitable purposes in Senate buildings. 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. COLLECTION OF CLOTHING, TOYS, FOOD, AND 

3 HOUSEWARES DURING THE HOLIDAY SEASON 

4 FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES IN SENATE 

5 BUILDINGS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi7 sion of the rules or regulations of the Senate— 

8 (1) a Senator, officer of the Senate, or em9 ployee of the Senate may collect from another SenVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:20 Nov 15, 2018 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SR696.ATS SR696

khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 696 ATS 

1 ator, officer of the Senate, or employee of the Senate 

2 within a Senate building or other office secured for 

3 a Senator nonmonetary donations of clothing, toys, 

4 food, and housewares for charitable purposes related 

5 to serving persons in need or members of the Armed 

6 Forces and the families of those members during the 

7 holiday season, if the charitable purposes do not oth8 erwise violate any rule or regulation of the Senate 

9 or of Federal law; and 

10 (2) a Senator, officer of the Senate, or em11 ployee of the Senate may work with a nonprofit or12 ganization with respect to the delivery of donations 

13 described under paragraph (1). 

14 (b) EXPIRATION.—The authority provided by this 

15 resolution shall expire at the end of the second session 

16 of the 115th Congress. 

Æ 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 669 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 669

Supporting the designation of September 2018 as ``National Alcohol and 
                    Drug Addiction Recovery Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 4, 2018

    Mr. King (for himself and Mrs. Capito) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the designation of September 2018 as ``National Alcohol and 
                    Drug Addiction Recovery Month''.

Whereas the theme for National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month in 2018 
        is ``Join the Voices for Recovery: Invest in Health, Homes, Purpose, and 
        Community'';
Whereas an estimated 72,000 people in the United States suffered a fatal 
        overdose in 2017, with an average number of 197 fatal overdoses per day;
Whereas there are roughly 25,000,000 people in the United States in recovery 
        from alcohol and drug addiction;
Whereas the total cost to the economy of prescription opioid misuse is 
        $78,500,000,000 annually, and includes the cost of healthcare, lost 
        productivity, addiction treatment, and involvement of the criminal 
        justice system;
Whereas people with substance use disorder face stigma from health professionals 
        as well as friends and family;
Whereas it has been demonstrated that that stigma is a major barrier for people 
        with substance use disorder to access treatment and engage in recovery; 
        and
Whereas peer-supported communities offer people with substance use disorder 
        better success in recovery, address personal and emotional effects of 
        addiction, and ease reintegration: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate joins the voices for recovery to invest 
in health, homes, purpose, and community in September 2018 and every 
month--
            (1) in recognizing the importance of education and 
        prevention of substance use disorder;
            (2) in exploring how integrated care, community, and sense 
        of purpose can lead to effective and sustainable treatment; and
            (3) in showing appreciation and gratitude for family 
        members, friends, and recovery allies who support individuals 
        in recovery.
                                 <all>
```
#### J. L. B., a Child under 18 Years of Age, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Lawrence , Judge of the Municipal Court of the City of Tulsa, Respondent.

No. P-81-243.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

July 20, 1981.

John Dratz, Jr., Tulsa, for J. L. B.

Jesse S. Harris, Asst. City Pros., Tulsa, for Yeagley.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION

Petitioner filed a motion to challenge municipal court jurisdiction in the Municipal Court of the City of Tulsa, their cases no. 0550678 and 302371, on March 20, 1981, on the basis of 10 O.S.Supp.1980, § 1101(b)(2), which defines a delinquent child, in part, as a habitual traffic offender. The petitioner claimed that the municipal court, therefore, lacked jurisdiction and that the juvenile division of the district court should determine his delinquency status. That motion was denied by the municipal court on April 3, 1981, and trial was set for May 8, 1981. On April 20,1981, the petitioner filed a writ in this Court to prohibit the May 8 trial, and this Court received the response of the Honorable Lawrence Yeagley on June 1, 1981.

While it is true that 10 O.S.Supp.1980, § 1101(b)(2) provides a statutory basis for delinquency as a result of habitual traffic offenses, 10 O.S.Supp.1980, § 1112(a) provides as follows:

> “However, nothing in this act shall be construed to prevent the exercise of concurrent jurisdiction by another division of the district court or by municipal courts in cases involving children where the child is charged with the violation of a state or municipal traffic law or ordinance.”

In *Mook v. City of Tulsa,*565 P.2d 1065 (Okl.Cr.1977), this Court said that:

> Since a child charged with violation of a state or municipal traffic law or ordinance is not delinquent, he is thereforwithin the exclusive jurisdiction of the municipal court or the criminal division of the district court *unless*a verified petition is submitted to the district court setting forth facts indicating that such child is habitual violator of such traffic laws or ordinances and therefore delinquent.

And in *DMT v. Edmiston,*560 P.2d 976 (Okl.Cr.1977), this Court held that a single violation is not an act of delinquency but that habitual traffic offenses will *support*a petition for an adjudication of delinquency. These cases clearly indicate that the discretion of whether to file an information charging the traffic offenses in the municipal court or a petition for delinquency in the juvenile division of the district court is left to the sound exercise of the proper *1223authorities of the municipal and district courts. The cause now before this Court does not reveal any abuse of that discretion.

Having examined the record before us, and being fully advised in the premises, it is the Order of this Court that the petition should be and hereby is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WITNESS OUR HANDS AND THE SEAL OF THIS COURT this 20th day of July, 1981.

TOM BRETT, P. J.

HEZ J. BUSSEY, J.