alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 179 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 56815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22839]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE

Sunshine Act Notice

    The Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and 
Community Service gives notice of the following meeting:

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, September 19, 2012, 10:00-11:30 a.m.

PLACE: The Washington Hilton Hotel, 1919 Connecticut Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20525.

CALL-IN INFORMATION: This meeting is available to the public through 
the following toll-free call-in number: 888-982-4693 conference call 
access code number 8625464. Any interested member of the public may 
call this number and listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur 
charges for calls they initiate over wireless lines, and CNCS will not 
refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls 
they initiate over land-line connections to the toll-free telephone 
number. Replays are generally available one hour after a call ends. The 
toll-free phone number for the replay is 800-860-4709. The end replay 
date is October 3, 2012, 10:59 p.m. (CT).

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
I. Chair's Opening Comments
    a. Call to Order, Welcome, and Preview of Today's Meeting Agenda
    b. Introduction & Acknowledgements
    c. Swearing-in New Board Members
    i. Matt McCabe
    ii. Lisa Garcia Quiroz
    d. Summary of Retreat
    e. Momentum & Budget
II. Consideration of Previous Meeting's Minutes
III. CEO Report
IV. Discussions, Deliberations and Official Actions
V. Public Comments
VI. Final Comments & Adjournment

    Members of the public who would like to comment on the business of 
the Board may do so in writing or in person. Individuals may submit 
written comments to jmauk@cns.gov subject line: SEPTEMBER 2012 CNCS 
BOARD MEETING by 4:00 p.m. e.t. on Friday, September 14th. Individuals 
attending the meeting in person who would like to comment will be asked 
to sign-in upon arrival. Comments are requested to be limited to 2 
minutes.

REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS: The Corporation for National and Community 
Service provides reasonable accommodations to individuals with 
disabilities where appropriate. Anyone who needs an interpreter or 
other accommodation should notify Ida Green at igreen@cns.gov or 202-
606-6861 by 5 p.m., September 14, 2012.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jenny Mauk, Special Assistant to 
the Chief Executive Officer, Corporation for National and Community 
Service, 1201 New York Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20525. Phone: (202) 
606-6615. Fax: (202) 606-3460. TTY: (800) 833-3722. Email: 
jmauk@cns.gov.

    Dated: September 11, 2012.
Valerie Green,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012-22839 Filed 9-12-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6050-$$-P
```
Dismiss and Opinion Filed March 18, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01585-CV 

SUSAN ANN FISHER, Appellant 

V. 

MEDICAL CENTER OF PLANO, CYNTHIA CARTER, R.N., ANNE W. HANDLEY, 

R.N. AND RAY J. DELGADILLO, R.T., Appellees 

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 296-01024-2014 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

Before the Court is appellees’ February 13, 2015, motion to dismiss for lack of 

jurisdiction. For the following reasons, we grant the motion and dismiss this appeal. 

In case No. 05-14-01441-cv, appellant appealed an order of the trial court dated October 

17, 2014, that dismissed her medical liability claims against two physicians for failure to comply 

with chapter 74 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. While that appeal was pending, 

appellant filed this case appealing two more orders of the trial court dated November 14, 2014, 

that dismissed her medical liability claims against Medical Center of Plano, Cynthia Carter, 

R.N., Anne Handley, R.N., and Ray Delgadillo, R.T. 

In this Court’s opinion of appellant’s appeal against the physicians, we explained that we 

do not have jurisdiction over appellant’s appeal because claims remain against a defendant in the 
 –2– 

suit below. See Fisher v. Medical Center of Plano, et al., No. 05-14-01441-CV, 2015 WL 73441 

(Tex. App.—Dallas Jan. 6, 2015, no pet. h.) (mem. op.). The trial court has neither rendered final 

judgment nor signed an appealable interlocutory order in this case. Id. For the same reasons, this 

Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. We DISMISS this appeal. 

141585F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

SUSAN ANN FISHER, Appellant 

No. 05-14-01585-CV V. 

MEDICAL CENTER OF PLANO, 

CYNTHIA CARTER, ANN W. 

HANDLEY, R.N. AND RAY J. 

DELGADILLO, R.T., Appellees 

 On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District 

Court, Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 296-01024-2014. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED for want 

of jurisdiction. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee MEDICAL CENTER OF PLANO, CYNTHIA CARTER, 

ANN W. HANDLEY, R.N. AND RAY J. DELGADILLO, R.T. recover their costs of this appeal 

from appellant SUSAN ANN FISHER. 

Judgment entered March 18, 2015.
[No. 36593-2-I.

Division One.

July 8, 1996.]

#### *In the Matter of the Estate of*Vera G. Harris. Maximo Acob, Jr., *as Personal Representative,*et al., *Respondents,*v. James D. Ballsmith, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-4-02973-5, Nicole Maclnnes J., entered April 11, 1995. *Reversed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2010

- NM

- 088

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report (the "Report") of Rand Logistics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: February 11, 2011/s/ Laurence S. LevyLaurence S. LevyChairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT SHAFEKA Z. MOHAMED, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. No. 98-2341 CREATIVE HAIRDRESSERS, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Hair Cuttery, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-97-970-3) Submitted: March 31, 1999 Decided: April 21, 1999 Before ERVIN and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSELScott Gregory Crowley, CROWLEY & CROWLEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Steven R. Semler, SEMLER & PRITZKER, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM:Shafeka Z. Mohamed appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to her employer and dismissing her discrimination claim, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, as amended. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. The relevant facts are undisputed. Shafeka Z. Mohamed worked as a hair stylist for Creative Hairdressers, Inc. ("Hair Cuttery"). At approximately 8:20 p.m., on November 8, 1996, Mohamed began to leave the Hair Cuttery shop to go home for the evening. The assistantmanager on duty that night informed Mohamed that she was scheduled to work until 9 p.m. and told her not to leave. Despite the manager's clear warning that if she left the store she could be fired, Mohamed left the shop. Thereafter, Mohamed was terminated for leaving early in direct violation of her manager's order to stay. Mohamed alleges she was fired because of her national origin and race. Mohamed's claims fail for several reasons. First, the derogatory comments made regarding her Egyptian heritage were unrelated to her termination and thus are not direct evidence of discrimination. See Hopkins v. Baltimore Gas & Elec. , 77 F.3d 745, 754 (4th Cir. 1996); Wilhelm v. Blue Bell, Inc. , 773 F.2d 1429, 1433-34 (4th Cir. 1985).Second, her clear act of insubordination reveals she was not performing her job in a satisfactory manner, and accordingly, she cannot establish a prima facie case of discrimination under the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting scheme. See Karpel v. Inova Health Sys. Servs. , 134 F.3d 1222, 1228 (4th Cir. 1998). Third, Mohamed hasfailed to rebut the employer's legitimate nondiscriminatory justification for its action. See St. Mary's Honor Ctr. v. Hicks , 509 U.S. 502, 507-08 (1993).
2Finally, we find no merit in Mohamed's allegation that the districtcourt was hostile to her claim and unfairly biased against her. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We grant Hair Cuttery's motion to submit the case without oral argument, b ecause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 3
The Ho norable Elsijane Trimble Roy, United States District Judge for th e 1 Eastern District of Arkansas.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-1496

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Akim Hassan L. Sharpe, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: July 6, 1998 Filed: July 9, 1998

___________ Before WOLLMAN, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
In 199 6, Akim Hassan L. Sharpe pleaded guilty to possessing stolen mail, i n viola tionof 18 U.S.C. § 1708, and was sentenced to three years & probation. Afte r Sharpe had served approximately 21 months of his sentence, the district court granted 1 the government & s motion to revoke Sharpe & s probation based on numerous violations of his supervision conditions. The court sentenced Sharpe to four months &-2-

im prisonment

and three years & supervised release. Sharpe now challenges hi s revocation sentence, arguing tha t the district court should have credited him for the 21 months of his probation sentence that he had already served. We disagree. When a d istrict court finds that a defendant has violated a condition of hi s probation, the court may revoke probation and impose any other sentence that coul d have b een imposed initially. See 18 U.S.C. § 3565(a); U.S. Sentencing Guideline s Manual Ch. 7, Pt. A, intro. 2(a) (1997); United States v. Iversen , 90 F.3d 1340, 1345 (8t h Cir. 1996) (upon revocation of probation, district court may sentence defendan t withinrange of sentences available at time of initial sentencing). In doing so, th e district cou rt may not credit a defendant “for any portion of the term of probatio n served prior to revocation.” See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.5(a), p.s. (1997). Thus, we conclude that the revocation sentence was proper. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1708, 3559(a)(4), 3583(b)(2); U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.4(a), p.s. (1997). The judgment is affirmed. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IASIS Healthcare LLC;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ W. Carl WhitmerW. Carl WhitmerChief Financial Officer
Exhibit
10.17


 


Yoshiharu
Global Co.


6940
Beach Blvd., Suite D-705


Buena
Park, CA 90621


 


May
23, 2022


 


	 	RE:
    	EMPLOYMENT
    OFFER LETTER


 


Dear
Ryan,


 


This
is an offer for the position of “Chief Finance Officer” at Yoshiharu Global Co., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).
We believe you will be an excellent addition to our management team, and are very much looking forward to having you on board.


 


The
Company is pleased to offer you the following:


 


	 	■	Term.
    May 23, 2022 – May 22, 2023. The term will auto renew annually, unless the Company determines not to renew the term with
    60 days prior written notice to you.
	 	 	 
	 	■	Compensation.
    $144,000 with yearly adjustments based on performance. Please note that as a salaried, exempt employee there is no overtime paid.
	 	 	 
	 	■	Non-Compete
    Agreement and Employee Handbook. The Company’s standard non-compete and confidentiality agreement as well as employee handbook
    must be signed prior to the start date.
	 	 	 
	 	■	Restricted
    Stock Unit (RSU). The Company grants $56,000 worth of shares of RSU which will be vested in 3 months after employment and can
    be sold after one year. Detail terms and conditions of the RSU will be provided in a separate RSU agreement as a part of this offer
    letter.


 


Your
employment with the Company is at-will, and the Company can terminate the employment relationship at any
time without cause and without notice. In the role of CFO, you are expected to perform services for clients assigned by the Company,
and carry out the professional duties and responsibilities by the means and manner which those shall be performed in accordance with
principles and rules of professional conduct.


 


If
you choose to accept this position with the Company, please sign and return it to us within 2 days from the date of this letter. Please
feel free to call me any time if you have questions. Thank you, and we look forward to welcoming you to the family.


 


	 	Best
    regards,
	 	 
	 	/s/
    James Chae
	 	James
    Chae
	 	President
    & CEO


 


ACCEPTED
AND AGREED TO 


THIS
23rd DAY OF MAY 2022.


 


	Signature:
    	/s/
    Soojae Ryan Cho	 	Date:
    	May
    23, 2022
Exhibit 31.1  Certifications  I, Mike Mckeever, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d- 18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following  unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Computershare Trust Company, National  Association.  Date: March 29, 2023  Mike Mckeever   President   Carvana Receivables Depositor LLC   (senior officer in charge of securitization)  /s/ Mike Mckeever
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of SI Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
period covered by this Report.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Rheo A. BrouillardRheo A. BrouillardPresident and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 12, 2009By:

/s/ Brian J. HullBrian J. HullExecutive Vice President, Treasurer and
Chief Financial OfficerAugust 12, 2009
IA

Union Calendar No. 364

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 101

[Report No. 107–602]

Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained in section 402(c)

of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to Vietnam.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 25, 2002

Mr. ROHRABACHER introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

JULY 22, 2002

Reported adversely from the Committee on Ways and Means, committed to

the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained

in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect

to Vietnam.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress does not approve the extension of the

4 authority contained in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of
2

•HJ 101 RH

1 1974 recommended by the President to the Congress on

2 June 3, 2002, with respect to Vietnam.

Union Calendar No. 364

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 101

[Report No. 107–602]

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority

contained in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of1974 with respect to Vietnam.

JULY 22, 2002

Reported adversely from the Committee on Ways and

Means, committed to the Committee of the WholeHouse on the State of the Union, and ordered to beprinted
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-14-00207-CV

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 2013-45235A

Style:

Ellen Lumenta, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Roy Revelino 

Nawawi, Deceased

v Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., Bell Helicopter Korea Inc., Bell Helicopter Corporation, 

Bell Helicopter International Inc., Bell Helicopter International Sales Corporation, Pratt & 

Whitney and United Technologies Corporation

Date motion filed*: April 3, 2015

Type of motion:

Motion to Include in the Record the Deposition of Harold Barrentine and the Record of 

the Hearing Transcript of December 16, 2013 Hearing

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Motion

Is appeal accelerated? YES NO

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: Dismissed in part because the record of the December 16, 2013 hearing is already on file in the 

appeal. Denied in part because the record does not reflect that the Deposition of Harold Barrentine was 

before the trial court at the time it ruled on the motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens. See In re 

Hardwick, 426 S.W.3d 151, 158 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2012, orig. proceeding) (noting scope of 

review limited to record before trial court at time of ruling). 

Judge's signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of 

Date: April 14, 2015
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2011

- NM

- 229

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)