alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
01/10/2011 08:42 7756876396 NV ENV PROTECTION PAGE El2/1l4 

# STATE OF NEVADA**)Iml;,bbon$,~~'rn~r**

____**D_e..:p_a_rt_m_e_n_t_of_C_on_s-e_rv_:l_ti_o_n_&~N-at-u:"'"ra-:-I~R=-e$_o \J_rc.~e_s**  __ 

### __ ...**-!,!!!:.!.:~iO"i.Direl~** DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION teQ hi, t.>,'Ozdof(. Jt.E,. Ad"'inistrdtllf

March 26, 2008 

### Ken Cronin WRAP Tribal 

### Caucus Coordinator National Tribal Environmental Council 2501 Rio Grande Blvd. NW, Suite A 

### Albuquerque. NM 87104 Re: Regional 

### Haze Rule Consultation 

### with 

### Tribes. 

### Dear Mr. Cronin: The primary purpose ofthis letter is to provide you with 

### an updated contact per:;oll 

### for the 

### Nevada Division ofEnvironmental Proteetion- 

### Bureau ofAir Quality 

### Plannins: (NDEP·BAQP) regarding the consultation process during the development 

### process ofNevada's 

### R'c,ponal Haze State Implementation Plan (SIP). NDEP·BAQP 

### understands that consultation with Nevada tdbes is necessary. As prlI"l: ofthis 

### process, Nevada welcomes tribal**partic~pation.** In addition to 

### cOI11.1Itunicating thru JUf

### primary contact listed below, we 

### 'Will also work closely with the Division's Tribal Liaison Ms. Tan!;ey 

### AndeI"5on. Per a 

### recent telephone call with 

### you we understand that you will forward this lettE:r to the 

### Tribes in Nevada and then provide us with a list ofthose 

### Tribes. The primary 

### contact for NDEP-BAQP is Frank Forsgren, Environmental Scietdst. Mailing address: Email address: Phone: 901 S Stewart 

### Street, Suite 4001 ffGrsgre@ndW.nv.gov 775.687.9364 

### Carson City, NY 89701 Thank 

### you.
Sioc=ly, 

# i /1rdv---­

# "~on,. SUP""isor Planning Bra:[lch 

### Bure.\l.u ofAir QuaUty 

### Planning Cc: Ms. Tansey Anderson, NT)EP Triblllliaison

901 S. Stewart Street, Suite 4001 • Camm City, Ncvada 8970 I • p: 775687.4670 • f: 77S687,;,S!;6
......ww,ndep.nv.go"
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-93,252-01

EX PARTE DUSTIN ALLEN HENSLEY, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1473696-A IN THE 208 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of possession of child pornography and, after a period of deferred

adjudication probation, sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for

a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. 

See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that plea was involuntary because he was incompetent to stand trial and

initial plea counsel did not investigate his competency or sanity and did not bring his psychological

issues to the attention of the court. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to

relief. Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (1970). Accordingly, the record should be developed. 

The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, §
2

3(d). The trial court shall order original plea counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing

the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects

to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and

wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the

hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court

shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s

plea was involuntary. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems 

appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 

Filed: January 12, 2022 

Do not publish
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 489

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States should not

rejoin the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 26, 2002

Mr. PAUL (for himself, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. JEFF MILLER of Florida, Mr.

HOSTETTLER, and Mr. WELDON of Florida) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International

Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States

should not rejoin the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

Whereas President Ronald Reagan withdrew the United

States from membership in UNESCO in 1984, citing

gross financial mismanagement, anti-American bias, and

anti-freedom policies;

Whereas in 2001 President George Bush supported an

amendment to H.R. 1646 that would have stricken language of congressional support for a renewal of United

States membership in UNESCO;

Whereas the United States has a single vote in UNESCO despite being assessed 25 percent of the UNESCO budget
2

•HCON 489 IH

and having promised to contribute $60,000,000 upon rejoining the organization;

Whereas the current UNESCO director’s belated attempts at

cost cutting were so resisted by the organization that his

own staff went on a hunger strike;

Whereas UNESCO membership may force unconstitutional

restraints on United States freedom of the press;

Whereas UNESCO, through a memorandum of agreement

with the Department of State, has designated 47 United

Nations biosphere reserves in the United States covering

more than 70 million acres, without congressional consultation or approval;

Whereas UNESCO effectively bypasses congressional authority to manage Federal lands by establishing management

policies without congressional consultation or approval;

Whereas UNESCO membership would undermine United

States sovereignty by forcing United States adherence to

the United Nations global policy on bioethics;

Whereas UNESCO seeks to levy an unconstitutional ‘‘global

tax’’ on Internet use on United States citizens; and

Whereas UNESCO has a history of meddling in the education policies of its member-countries and has sought to

dictate school curriculum for United States primary and

secondary schools, thus undermining United States sovereignty: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 United States should not rejoin the United Nations Edu-
3

•HCON 489 IH

1 cational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization

2 (UNESCO).

Æ
TS-CKHI01

Attachment #8

Pt. 2, Sec. B, End

Worker/Occupational Exposure and Envi ronmental Release In formation on the

New Chemical Substance at Industr ial Sites Controlled by Others
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

. SE 04 331A017
# FILED
October 27, 1997 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

NOT FOR PUBLICAT

ION

ROBERT BEAN , FRANKLIN ) SHAFFER, DAVID AUTRY, ) MACK ROBERTS, KEVIN ANTLE, ) TOM NICHOLS, TAMMIE BEASLEY, ) and ROXANNE LUCE, ) ) Plaintiffs/Appellees, ) ) DAVIDSON CHANCERY v. ) ) NED RAY McWHERTER, in his ) Appeal No. 01S01-9607-CH-00132 capacity as Governor of the State of ) Tennessee, CHARLES W. BURSON, ) Attorney General of the State o f ) Tennessee, TENNESSEE WILDLIFE ) RESOURCES COMMISSION, and ) GARY MYERS, Director of the ) Wildlif e Resources Age ncy, ) ) Defendants/Appellants. )



### ORDER ON PETI TION TO REHEAR
A petition for rehearing has b een filed on behalf of Plai ntiffs/Appellees. After consideration of the same, the C ourt is of the opinion that the petition should be and the same is hereby denied at the cost of Plaintiffs/Appelle es.
Enter this _____ day o

f October, 1997.

PER CURIAM
AMS Unpasteurized Liquid Whole Eggs for Further Processing Contractor Indicator Organism Performance - Fiscal Year: 20211/,2/

Standard Plate Count3/ Total Coliforms4/ Generic E. coli5/

Contractor

# Lots Produced 

(% of Total)

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit

C4 311 (94.5) 20 6.4 9 2.9 11 3.5

C6 18 (5.5) 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 329 (100.0) 20 6.1 9 2.7 11 3.3

1/A full description of the unpasteurized liquid whole eggs for further processing purchase program specification is available at https://www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food/product-specs#Eggs. 2/Production Dates: October 1, 2020 to September 30, 2021. 3/Standard Plate Count Critical Limit: 50,000 CFU/g.

4/Total Coliforms Critical Limit: 5,000 CFU/g.

5/Generic E. coli Critical Limit: 1,000 CFU/g.
AMS All Purpose Egg Mix Contractor Microbial Performance - Fiscal Year: 20191/,2/

Standard Plate Count3/ Total Coliforms4/ Salmonella5/

Contractor

# Lots Produced 

(% of Total)

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit # Positive % Positive

C1 142 (100.0) 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 142 (100.0) 0 0 0 0 0 0

1/A full description of the all purpose egg mix purchase program specification is available at https://www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food/product-specs#Eggs. 2/Production Dates: October 1, 2018 to September 30, 2019. 3/Standard Plate Count Critical Limit: 1,000 CFU/g.

4/Total Coliforms Critical Limit: 10 CFU/g.

5/Salmonella Critical Limit: Positive (+) Result / 25g.
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
FalconTarget, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the
fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

FalconTarget, Inc.

Date: February 15, 2006

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan

Serge Atlan

Chairman

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
### Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building P.O. Box 2063 Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063 July 23, 2010 Secretary 717-787-2814

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 1650 Arch Street (Mail Code: 3RA00) Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029
Dear Mr. Garvin: In accordance with Section 110(a) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7410, enclosed for your approval is a revision to Pennsylvania's State Implementation Plan (SIP) concerning the control of nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from glass melting furnaces. The final-form regulation published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin on June 19, 2010, establishes in 25 Pa. Code Chapter 129 (relating to standards for sources) NOx emission control requirements, NOx emission standards, and related administrative requirements for the purpose of reducing NOx emissions from glass melting furnaces. (40 Pa.B. 3328) The SIP submittal includes two hard copies and one compact disk consisting of the final rulemaking published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin on June 19, 2010 (40 Pa.B. 3328), documentation of the public participation process which includes proof of public notice, an Advance Notice of Final Rulemaking (ANFR) notice, the ANFR Comment and Response Document, and the Department of Environmental Protection's Comment and Response Document. Should you have any questions regarding this SIP revision, please contact Joyce E. Epps, Director, Bureau of Air Quality, by e-mail at jeepps@state.pa.us or by telephone at 717-787-9702. Sincerely,

Jon anger Secretary

Enclosures

An Equal Opportunity Employer www.dep.state.pa.us Printed on Recycled Paper 

### 64:
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Blackhawk Capital Group
        BDC, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Craig A. Zabala,
        Chief
        Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350,
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
        the
        best of my knowledge, that:
 
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
                  October 31, 2005By:
                  /s/ Craig A. ZabalaCraig
                  A. Zabala, Chief Executive Officer
New Permit Process Goals

The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) has reengineered its Air 

Quality Division (AQD) Permit to Install (PTI) application review process. The review 

process has been redesigned to address the needs of the modern, fast-paced economy, 

while preserving or improving environmental protection.

PTI Applicants and the general public will be the primary benefactors of the 

reengineered permitting process. The reengineered process will provide:

• A review process that is efficient, concise, and transparent.

• Maximum environmental protection and manufacturing flexibility.

• More opportunities for face-to-face meetings so requirements are clearly 

communicated at the start and throughout the permitting process.

• Compliance with all state and federal requirements.

• Permit issuance in 6 months or less.

• Achievable, demonstrable, and value-added permit conditions.

• Opportunities for increased and enhanced public involvement.
[No. 36491-0-I.

Division One.

August 26, 1996.]

#### Donna Bode, et al., *Appellants,*v. Country Companies Insurance and Investment Group, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for What-com County, No. 92-2-01232-1, Michael F. Moynihan, J., entered April 14, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Ellington, J., concurred in by Coleman and Grosse, JJ.
Exhibit 32.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Solo Cup Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Susan H. Marks, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Susan H. Marks     
|Susan H. Marks         
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 16, 2005        



6
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 67 

Expressing support for health and wellness coaches and for the designation 

of February 13, 2017, through February 19, 2017, as ‘‘National Health 

and Wellness Coach Recognition Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 16), 2017 

Mr. HEINRICH submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for health and wellness coaches and for 

the designation of February 13, 2017, through February 

19, 2017, as ‘‘National Health and Wellness Coach Recognition Week’’. 

Whereas February 13, 2017, through February 19, 2017, is 

recognized as ‘‘National Health and Wellness Coach Recognition Week’’; 

Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention considers chronic diseases to be ‘‘the public health challenge 

of the 21st century’’; 

Whereas decades of research have linked lifestyle factors, 

such as inactivity, poor diet, tobacco smoking, and sustained stress, with increased risk for major illnesses and 

death; 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•SRES 67 ATS 

Whereas the costs associated with treating many chronic diseases are high and often preventable; 

Whereas a health and wellness coach is a new type of 

healthcare worker who serves as a supportive mentor to 

motivate individuals to make positive health choices and 

move toward specific wellness goals; 

Whereas health and wellness coaches support clients in 

achieving good health— 

(1) based on the goals of each client; and 

(2) in a manner consistent with the treatment plan 

recommended by a healthcare provider for the client; 

Whereas health and wellness coaches assist clients in making 

healthy lifestyle changes by encouraging them— 

(1) to use insight; 

(2) to use personal strengths and resources; 

(3) to set goals; 

(4) to create action steps; and 

(5) to hold themselves accountable; 

Whereas health and wellness coaches play a vital role in improving individual wellness that complements, and does 

not replace, the work of healthcare professionals; and 

Whereas an increasing number of studies demonstrate the effectiveness of health and wellness coaches in— 

(1) improving individual health and wellness; and 

(2) reducing healthcare costs: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the designation of the week of 

3 February 13, 2017, through February 19, 2017, as 

4 ‘‘National Health and Wellness Coach Recognition 

5 Week’’; and 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

3 

•SRES 67 ATS 

1 (2) supports the efforts of the health and 

2 wellness coaches of the United States in their impor3 tant work to improve the health and wellness of the 

4 people of United States. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 27, 2009 

p0120 

Order 

 

January 27, 2009 

137203 

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 137203 

 ADB: 07-000037-GA 

RONALD G. KRAFT, 

Respondent-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed 

by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Liang Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of Synutra International, Inc. (the “Registrant”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date: November 4, 2010
/s/ Liang ZhangName: Liang ZhangTitle: Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Registrant’s Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of INverso
Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

INverso Corp.

Date: February 14, 2006

By:   /s/   Thomas Kirchner

Thomas Kirchner

Chief Executive Officer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.