alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Notice of cancellation of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

On December 23, 2011, the Department of Energy (DOE) published a notice of open meeting announcing a meeting on January 19, 2012, of the Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Paducah. This notice announces the cancellation of this meeting. The meeting is being cancelled because the board will not have a quorum due to scheduling conflicts by members. The next regular meeting will be held on February 16, 2012. 

# DATES: 

                        The meeting scheduled for January 19, 2012, announced in the                               ( print page 2283)                            December 23, 2011, issue of the                         **Federal Register**                         (FR Doc. 2011-32913, 76 FR 80355), is cancelled. The next regular meeting will be held on February 16, 2012.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Reinhard Knerr, Deputy Designated Federal Officer, Department of Energy Paducah Site Office, Post Office Box 1410, MS-103, Paducah, Kentucky 42001; Phone: (270) 441-6825.

Issued at Washington, DC, on January 12, 2012.

LaTanya R. Butler,

Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-831 Filed 1-12-12; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6405-01-P
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 420

Expressing support for withdrawal of the United States from the AntiBallistic Missile (ABM) Treaty.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 13, 2002

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska (for himself, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. JEFF MILLER of Florida, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. JONES of North Carolina,

Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania, Mr. HAYES, Mr. HYDE, and Mr. WATTS

of Oklahoma) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on International Relations, and in addition to

the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing support for withdrawal of the United States from

the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty.

Whereas the Treaty between the United States and the

Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Limitation of

Anti-Ballistic Missile Systems, signed at Moscow on May

26, 1972 (23 UST 3435), which restricts the number

and location of anti-ballistic missile systems in each country, is based on the theory of ‘‘mutual assured destruction’’—that neither party would launch a nuclear missile

attack because to do so would result in both mutual and

total destruction;
2

•HCON 420 IH

Whereas circumstances affecting United States national security have changed fundamentally since 1972: today, not

only do the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China have ballistic missile arsenals that are capable of reaching the United States, but so do a growing

number of other countries that are hostile to United

States interests;

Whereas today the United States is confronted with new

threats to its national security, threats such as the use

of weapons of mass destruction wielded by terrorists and

rogue nations;

Whereas numerous countries are acquiring increasingly

longer-range ballistic missiles as instruments of blackmail

and coercion against the United States and its allies;

Whereas the United States must defend its homeland, its

armed forces, and friendly and allied countries against

these threats, including through the development and deployment of a national missile defense system—a system

which would violate the terms of the ABM Treaty—and

through cooperation with friendly and allied countries in

the development and deployment of such a layered missile

defense system against long-range threats; and

Whereas on December 13, 2001, President G.W. Bush provided notice to the Russian Federation that the United

States would withdraw from the ABM Treaty effective

June 13, 2002, in accordance with Article XV of the

Treaty: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress supports the decision of the

3 President to withdraw the United States from the Anti4 Ballistic Missile Treaty effective June 13, 2002, in accord-
3

•HCON 420 IH

1 ance with Article XV of the Treaty, and to provide for

2 the establishment of a robust layered missile defense sys3 tem to protect the United States and its allies.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 31.2****SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, A. Keith Wall, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q for the period ended April 4, 2007 of Buffets Holdings,Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: May 21, 2007         /s/ A. Keith Wall         A. Keith Wall    Chief Financial Officer    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and, |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the                Report. |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                John P. Keefe                                                                        |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | John                P. Keefe, Principal Executive Officerand Principal Financial                Officer |
|   |                                                                                                    |
|   | Date:                July 17, 2008                                                                      |

----
Fw: Correction to statement

Michael Stewart to: Tricia Crabtree 01/06/2010 12:15 PM

Tricia,

Can we please add this email to the SO2 docket?

Thanks!!

Michael J. Stewart, Ph.D.

Environmental Protection Specialist

Health and Environmental Impacts Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

(919) 541-7524

stewart.michael@epa.gov

----- Forwarded by Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US on 01/06/2010 12:14 PM -----

From: Deborah Shprentz <dshprentz@hers.com>

To: Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/06/2010 12:01 PM

Subject: Correction to statement

Michael,

I misspoke yesterday on the WHO recommendations for an SO2 standard and 

want to clarify my statement for the record.

There is some confusion depending upon whether you use the WHO 

conversion factor at 20 decrees centigrade, or the U.S. conversion 

factor at 25 decrees centigrade.

I consulted with Kaz Ito of NYU on this, one of the authors of the SO2 

chapter of the 2005 WHO Air Quality Guidelines Global Update. 

According to Kaz Ito, using the WHO conversion factor, a ppb value = (X 

in ug/m3)/2.86. 20/2.86 = 7ppb. With the U.S. conversion factor, 

20/2.62 = 7.6 ppb.

These values are the recommendation for the 24-hour standard.

The recommendation for the 10-minute standard is 500/2.86 = 175 ppb or 

500/2.62 = 191 ppb depending on which conversion factor you use. 

I believe these recommendations are consistent with our position 

opposing the revocation of the 24-hour standard and supporting a 1-hour 

standard of 50 ppb. 

-- 

Deborah Shprentz

Consultant to the American Lung Association

703-437-0959 phone

703-867-0959 cell

dshprentz@hers.com
# Information Form 

COOLAudit@usda.gov

# Follow up Review Checklist
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of International Securities Exchange, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30,
2005 (the Report), I, David Krell, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and I, Bruce Cooperman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |        |  |                                      
|------------------------ |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: November 10, 2005 |  | By:    |  | /s/ David Krell                      
|                         |  | Name:  |  | David Krell                          
|                         |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
|                         |  |       
|                         |  | By:    |  | /s/ Bruce Cooperman                  
|                         |  | Name:  |  | Bruce Cooperman                      
|                         |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer              



40
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Thomas Kirchner, certify that: 

  1) I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of FalconTarget, Inc.;  

  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;  

  3) Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;  

  4) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  

  a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based upon such evaluation; and  

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and  

  5) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):  

  a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlswhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation and  

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: November 21, 2008

By:   /s/   Thomas Kirchner 

    Thomas Kirchner

    Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of INverso
Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
quarter ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

INverso Corp.

Date: February 15, 2006

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan

Serge Atlan

Chairman

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 292 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 292

             Supporting the goals of the Year of the Rose.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2001

 Mr. McCrery submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
             Supporting the goals of the Year of the Rose.

Whereas the study of fossils has shown that the rose has been a native wild 
        flower in North America for over 35,000,000 years;
Whereas the rose is grown today in every State in the United States;
Whereas the rose has long been used to symbolize love, friendship, beauty, 
        peace, and the devotion of the people of the United States to their 
        Nation;
Whereas the rose has been cultivated and grown in gardens for over 5,000 years, 
        and is referred to in both the Old and New Testaments;
Whereas the rose has for many years captivated the affection of humankind and it 
        has been revered in art, music, and literature;
Whereas George Washington was a breeder of roses and one of his varieties, named 
        after his mother, is still grown today;
Whereas in 1986 the rose was designated as the national floral emblem of the 
        United States; and
Whereas the American Rose Society has designated 2002 as the Year of the Rose: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) supports the goals of the Year of the Rose; and
            (2) encourages the President to issue a proclamation 
        calling on the people of the United States to observe the year 
        with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
391 A.2d 682

#### Commonwealth v. Garvin, Appellant.

Argued March 23, 1978.

Richard R. Fink, Chief Public Defender, for appellant; Kenneth G. Biehn, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

SPAETH, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT NO.1 TO SECURED CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE


 


This Amendment No. 1 to the
Secured Convertible Promissory Note (the “Amendment”), is made as of May 20, 2022 is by VIA Motors International, Inc.,
(the “Borrower”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the respective meanings given to them in
the Note (defined below).


 


WHEREAS, the Borrower issued
a certain Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated August 30, 2021 (“Note”) to Ideanomics Inc., (“Lender”)
promising to repay the loan amount of $42,500,000.00 advanced by the Lender.


 


WHEREAS, the Borrower wishes
to borrow, and the Lender wishes to advance, an additional amount of US$ 2,318,111.00 on the terms and conditions set forth in the Note.


 


WHEREAS, the Borrower desires to amend the Note as provided
herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the mutual covenants herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the mutual receipt and legal sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, the Parties, intending to be legally bound, mutually agree as follows:


 


		1.	Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Note, effective as of the date hereof:



 


		a.	the
principal sum payable under the Note shall be FORTY-FOUR MILLION EIGHT HUNDRED EIGHTEEN THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED ELEVEN Dollars (US$44,818,111).



 


		b.	Simple
interest on (i) US$42,500,000 shall accrue from August 30, 2021 and (ii) US$ 2,318,111 shall accrue from the date hereof, in each case,
till the Maturity Date at the rate of four percent (4%) per annum (such principal and interest together and all other amounts due and
owing under the Note, the “Obligations”).



 


		2.	Except to the extent herein expressly modified by the foregoing provisions of this
Amendment, the Note is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects.



 


		3.	This Amendment may be executed by electronic signatures and in any number of counterparts with the
                                                          same effect as if all signatory parties had signed the same document. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall
                                                          constitute one and the same instrument.



 


[signature page follows]


 






     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused
this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered in its name and on its behalf, all as of the day and year first above written.


 


	 	VIA MOTORS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation
	 	 
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Alan Perriton              
	 	Name: 	Alan Perriton
	 	Title: 	President


 


 


	Acknowledged by:	 
	 	 
	IDEANOMICS, INC., a Nevada corporation	 
	 	 
	 	 
	By: 	/s/ Alfred Poor	 
	Name:	Alfred Poor	 
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer	 


 


[Signature Page to Amendment No.1 to the Convertible Note]