SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST

(In accordance with 40 CFR Part 51 - App. V)

 SIP Submitted by: District Department of the Environment 

 Date Received: June 9, 2014

 Subject: District of Columbia’s Infrastructure SIP Revision for the 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality

 Standard (NAAQS)

Completeness Review 

Completed by: Emlyn Vélez-Rosa 

 Date Completed: June 17, 2014

Administrative Materials

ACCEPTABLE

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his 

designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision 

thereof.

1. A letter dated June 6, 2014 from Keith A. Anderson, 

Director of the District Department of the Environment (DDoE) 

to Shawn M. Garvin, EPA Regional Administrator.

X

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code 

or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, or consent 

agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date

of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the 

plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date.

Check to see if the regulation, permit, order or consent decree 

has a sunset or expiration date. If so it is not acceptable as a 

SIP submission. 

2. Not a regulatory change, however applicable portions of 

section 110(a)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) are adopted in

Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) under 40 CFR Part 

52 Subpart J.

X

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority 

under State law to adopt and implement the plan.

3. The District of Columbia (the District) has the authority 

pursuant to the District of Columbia Air Pollution Control Act 

of 1984.

X

4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for 

approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including 

4. State regulations have been previously adopted and are 

being certified or referenced in the submittal. 

X
EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, 

where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official 

State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the 

appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable 

by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document 

shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself.

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural 

requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting 

and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan.

5. The submittal letter dated June 6, 2014 confirms that all 

required administrative procedures were properly followed for 

this SIP revision. A copy of public hearing notice and 

transcript were included.

X

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed 

change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including 

the date of publication of such notice.

6. Copy of notice of public hearing as published on the DDoE 

website on April 18, 2014, requesting both public written and 

oral comments by May 19, 2014. 

X

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance 

with the information provided in the public notice and the 

State's laws and constitution, if applicable.

7. The public hearing was held on May 19, 2014 in accordance 

with information provided in notice. A hearing officer’s 

certification for the public hearing was provided.

X

8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response 

thereto.

8. No public comments were received at the hearing or during 

the comment period.

X

 Technical Materials

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), specifically the 2010 NO2 National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)

X

2. Identification of the locations of affected sources including 

the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations 

and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s).

2. Most of the State regulations certified or referenced in the 

SIP submittal apply statewide.

X

3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions 

from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current 

3. Not applicable. The SIP revision addresses necessary 

elements for implementation of the 2010 NO2 NAAQS. This 

X
EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, 

quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected 

sources through calculations of the differences between certain 

baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result 

of the revision.

SIP submittal does not relate to modification of existing

emission limits. 

4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air 

quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration 

increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and 

visibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved 

and implemented. 

4. The SIP revision addresses necessary elements for 

implementation of the 2010 NO2 NAAQS. The SIP revision 

submittal certifies existing air pollution control programs in the 

District’s SIP, as provided in 40 CFR Part 52 Subpart J.

 

X

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed 

revision, including input data, output data, models used, 

ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, 

justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of 

models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the

determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis.

5. Not applicable. No modeling required to support SIP 

revision. 

X

6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are 

based on continuous emission reduction technology.

6. The SIP revision addresses necessary elements for 

implementation of the 2010 NO2 NAAQS. The SIP revision 

submittal certifies that the District has adopted control 

measures and emission limitations for NO2 in the SIP, as 

provided in 40 CFR Part 52 Subpart J.

X

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work 

practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, 

where necessary, to ensure emission levels.

7. The SIP revision addresses necessary elements for 

implementation of the 2010 NO2 NAAQS. The SIP revision 

submittal certifies that the District has adopted control 

measures and emission limitations for NO2 in the SIP, as 

provided in 40 CFR Part 52 Subpart J. 

X

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how 8. The SIP revision addresses necessary elements for X
EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

compliance will be determined in practice. implementation of the 2010 NO2 NAAQS. The SIP revision 

submittal certifies that the District has adopted 

compliance/enforcement measures for NO2 in the SIP, as 

provided in 40 CFR Part 52 Subpart J. 

9. Special economic and technological justifications required by

any applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, 

explain why.)

9. Not applicable. No special justifications are required. X

10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a 

maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant 

NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation.

10. Not applicable. Not a Section 107 request. X