alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1





I, Jon Winkelried, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 of TPG Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b) [Omitted];


c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and


5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





Date: March 29, 2022


/s/ Jon WinkelriedJon WinkelriedChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 35.1








ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2022 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2022-1, as Issuer (the "Issuer"), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, and CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:





1. CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





2. The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate.





3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on March 1, 2022 and ending on February 28, 2023 and of the Servicer's performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.








Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 26th day of May, 2023.





CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC





/s/ Andrew J. McMonigle


Andrew J. McMonigle


Vice President and Treasurer
**
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of C5 Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the period ending December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, in the capacity and on the date indicated below,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 
Date: March 28, 2022  By: 
/s/ David Glickman
   **David Glickman**   **Chief Business Development Officer and Chief Financial Officer**   **(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)****
AMS Boneless Beef SupplierIndicator Organism Performance - Fiscal Year: 20231/,2/

Standard PlateCount3/ Total Coliforms4/ Generic E.coli5/

Supplier

# Lots Produced

(% of Total)

#Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit

#Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit

# Exceeding 

Critical Limit

% Exceeding 

Critical Limit

S1 5,029 (9.6) 4 0.08 5 0.10 4 0.08

S2 365 (0.7) 1 0.27 3 0.82 2 0.55

S4 14,535 (27.7) 8 0.06 13 0.09 12 0.08

S5 6,679 (12.7) 5 0.07 9 0.13 5 0.07

S6 1,898 (3.6) 9 0.47 39 2.05 5 0.26

S10 5,195 (9.9) 25 0.48 39 0.75 24 0.46

S11 412 (0.8) 2 0.49 3 0.73 1 0.24

S14 2,833 (5.4) 8 0.28 3 0.11 3 0.11

S21 8,993 (17.2) 2 0.02 13 0.14 12 0.13

S29 3,251 (6.2) 2 0.02 4 0.12 4 0.12

S43 477 (0.9) 1 0.21 0 0 0 0

S44 1,044 (2.0) 7 0.67 11 1.05 0 0

S47 1,219 (2.3) 4 0.33 3 0.25 2 0.16

S48 66 (0.1) 0 0 0 0 0 0

S49 18 (0) 0 0 1 5.56 0 0

S50 399 (0.8) 6 1.50 4 1.0 2 0.50

Total 52,413 (100.0) 84 0.16 150 0.29 76 0.15 1/A full description of the boneless beef purchase program specification is available at https://www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food/product-specs#Beef. 2/Production Dates: October 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023. 3/Standard Plate Count Critical Limit: 100,000 CFU/g. 4/Total Coliforms Critical Limit: 1,000 CFU/g. 5/Generic E. coli Critical Limit: 500 CFU/g.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-867]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-489-501]


Certain Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube From Turkey: Extension 
of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Victoria Cho or Christopher Hargett, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 4014, 14th Street and 
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-5075 
or (202) 482-4161, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On June 28, 2011, the U.S. Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') published a notice of initiation of the administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on certain welded carbon steel 
pipe and tube from Turkey covering the period May 1, 2010, through 
April 30, 2011. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 37781 
(June 28, 2011). The preliminary results are currently due no later 
than January 31, 2012.

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Review

    Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the 
Act''), requires the Department to make a preliminary determination 
within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of an order 
for which a review is requested. Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 
further states that if it is not practicable to complete the review 
within the time period specified, the administering authority may 
extend the 245-day period to issue its preliminary results to up to 120 
days.
    We determine that completion of the preliminary results of this 
review within the 245-day period is not practicable because we have 
complex technical issues relating to quarterly cost, which require 
additional information and analysis for this administrative review. Due 
to these reasons and in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Act, we are extending the time period for issuing the preliminary 
results of the review by 120 days. The preliminary results are now due 
no later than May 31, 2012. Unless extended, the final results continue 
to be due 120 days after publication of the preliminary results, 
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: January 11, 2012.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012-867 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### Aundrea DANCY, Appellant, v. Danny HAROLD, et al., Appellee.

Nos. 93-01443, 93-01232.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 8, 1993.

ORDERED that appellee’s motion to dismiss appeal is granted and this appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, is hereby dismissed as a non-appealable order. See *Board of County Commissioners v. Grice,*438 So.2d 392 (Fla.1983).

JORGENSON, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ., concur.
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 12:13 PM

To: 'woliphant@polesafety.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA); Pearson, La kisha (FAA); Cooper, Thuy (FAA) Subject: Request for Additional Information: Advanced Aerial Inspection Resources



### January 26, 2015

Mr. Wesley J. Oliphant, PE, F.SEI, F.ASCE Advanced Aerial Inspection Resources
32628 Decker Prairie Rd. Suite 1 Magnolia, TX 77355

Dear Mr. Oliphant:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-0873). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide information regarding the radio frequency sp ectrum. This information can be located in the
aircraft manual.

 Provide information regarding the pr oposed Loss Link Procedures. This information can be located in
the aircraft manual.

 Provide information regarding the pr oposed Flight Termination System (FTS). This information can be
located in the aircraft manual.

 Your petition references the materials listed below, however the materials were not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

o AAIR Team Procedures Manual

o sUAS Operations Manual

o Flight Control System Manual

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to nia.daniels@faa.gov . If
you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the in formation described above by February 9, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-7626.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst2 Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108
Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
H. Con. Res. 483 Agreed to September 26, 2002

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 1646) to authorize

appropriations for the Department of State for fiscal year 2003,

to authorize appropriations under the Arms Export Control Act

and the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 for security assistance

for fiscal year 2003, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House

of Representatives shall insert at the appropriate place the following

new section (and conform the table of contents accordingly):

SEC. 1309. THREE-YEAR INTERNATIONAL ARMS CONTROL AND NONPROLIFERATION STRATEGY.

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of

this Act, the Secretary of State shall prepare and submit to the

appropriate congressional committees a 3-year international arms

control and nonproliferation strategy. The strategy shall contain

the following:

(1) A 3-year plan for the reduction of existing nuclear,

chemical, and biological weapons and ballistic missiles and

for controlling the proliferation of these weapons.

(2) Identification of the goals and objectives of the United

States with respect to arms control and nonproliferation of

weapons of mass destruction and their delivery systems.
H. Con. Res. 483—2

(3) A description of the programs, projects, and activities

of the Department of State intended to accomplish goals and

objectives described in paragraph (2).

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONS     I, Charles B. Clark, Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Calpine Generating Company, LLC andCalGen Finance Corp. (the “registrants”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrants’ other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrants, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants’ internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrants’ most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants’ internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrants’ other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants’ auditors and theaudit committee of the registrants’ board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrants’ ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrants’ internal control over financial reporting.Date:December 14, 2006   /s/ *Charles B. Clark, Jr.* Charles B. Clark, Jr.
!"#
#	 $%# %	&  '(
#) *
+(,*!
"(	,

-. /0-123456789:;8<=>?@ABC

D;8EDFGH3E:;6HF

I:J8KL M6NO M6N- M6NP 

RHEEHN6;S T:;836:K

U3HVW

RHEEHN6;S T:;836:K 98L436W;HF

XHK64;: HF

D;8EYVEJ83 98L;6F: HF

R6;SZX:8

[F6;HG T8:LV38

\[HT] ^V:F;6S

\_3N83

[_T]

`abcdefghi

`abjfkela

defghibem

jnh@o>p`

?> qrnlfhcqk p` ?=c> s

tuvwxy

hz{u

j|ae }~akn

qkjaelcrhjs fpdk|` e rfl khjfeqcpj ~krhlnk

irlne`

qzvhz{u

j|ae }~akn

qkjaelrhj@j|rkdf

rpcj| kdfcrp

`ke rflj|ae } ~akn@j|rkdf

rpcj| kdfcrp

khjfeqcpjcezvxcrp ~krhlnk

jeflaekhnfce

fuyqyu Bs?== Bs?>> Bso> zv

kzywu ?=c> s > >s>> >s> 

`abcdefghi

`abjfkela

defghibem

jnh@o>p`

?> qrnlfhcqk p` ?=c> s

tuvwxy

hz{u

j|ae }~akn

qkjaelcrhjs fpdk|` e rfl khjfeqcpj ~krhlnk

irlne`

qzvhz{u

j|ae }~akn

qkjaelrhj@j|rkdf

rpcj| kdfcrp

`ke rflj|ae } ~akn@j|rkdf

rpcj| kdfcrp

khjfeqcpjcezvxcrp ~krhlnk

jeflaekhnfce

fuyqyu Bs?== Bs?>> Bso> zv

kzywu ?=c> s > >s>> >s> 

`abcdefghi

`abjfkela

defghibem

jnh@o>p`

?> qrnlfhcqk p` ?=c> s

tuvwxy

hz{u

j|ae }~akn

qkjaelcrhjs fpdk|` e rfl khjfeqcpj ~krhlnk

irlne`

qzvhz{u

j|ae }~akn

qkjaelrhj@j|rkdf

rpcj| kdfcrp

`ke rflj|ae } ~akn@j|rkdf

rpcj| kdfcrp

khjfeqcpjcezvxcrp ~krhlnk

jeflaekhnfce

fuyqyu Bs?== Bs?>> Bso> zv

kzywu ?=c> s > >s>> >s> 

`abcdefghi `abjfkela

defghibem

jnh@o>p`

?> qrnlfhcqk p` ?=c> s > tuvwxy

hz{u

j|ae }~akn

qkjaelcrhjs fpdk|` e rfl khjfeqcpj ~krhlnk

irlne`

qzv

hz{u

j|ae }~akn

qkjaelrhj@

j|rkdf

rpcj| kdfcrp

`ke rflj|ae } ~akn@j|rkdf

rpcj| kdfcrp

khjfeqc

pjcezvxcrp ~krhlnk

jeflaekhnfce
 	





 

!"#
#	 $%# %	&  '(
#) *
+(,*!
"(	,

-./0-123405.631

758/9: ;6<= ;6<> ;6<? 

A3003<6.B C5./4659

D43EF

A3003<6.B C5./4659 G/:H46F.31

I396H.5 31

-./0JE08/4 G/:.615 31

A6.BKI5/

L16.32 C/5:E4/

ML3CN OE51.6B

MP4</4

LPCN

QRSTUTVWS XYZ[\\ XYZ[]^^ XYZ_`^ bcdefVg

hidTjS [\k^ Z ^ ^Z^^ ^Z^ 

lmnkopQqrs

lmntQhpum

opQqrsnpv

twrx_^yl

[^ UzwuQrkUh yl [\k^ Z

{Sej|T

rd}S

t~mp mhw

UhtmpukzrtZ Qyoh~l p zQu hrtQpUkyt hzruwh

szuwpl

Udefrd}S

t~mp mhw

Uhtmpuzrtxt~zhoQ

zykt~ hoQkzy

lhp zQut~mp  mhwxt~zhoQ

zykt~ hoQkzy

hrtQpUkytkpdef|ckzy hzruwh

tpQumphrwQkp

QRSTUTVWS XYZ[\\ XYZ[]^^ XYZ_`^ bcdefVg

hidTjS ^Z ^ [\k^ Z ^ ^Z^ 

lmnkopQqrs

lmntQhpum

opQqrsnpv

twrx_^yl

[^ UzwuQrkUh yl [\k^ Z

{Sej|T

rd}S

t~mp mhw

UhtmpukzrtZ Qyoh~l p zQu hrtQpUkyt hzruwh

szuwpl

Udefrd}S

t~mp mhw

Uhtmpuzrtxt~zhoQ

zykt~ hoQkzy

lhp zQut~mp  mhwxt~zhoQ

zykt~ hoQkzy

hrtQpUkytkpdef|ckzy hzruwh

tpQumphrwQkp

QRSTUTVWS XYZ[\\ XYZ[]^^ XYZ_`^ bcdefVg

hidTjS [\k^ Z ^ ^Z^^ ^Z^ 

t|gTVf\^Yx\ [hpVfpS Tj

wVT|jcWfVW|STjgfSR|iVeqZudfSe_k\a [Yk^ _ak[] `^ak `]ak_^\Y_ak[^`]ak_ ^ak_ ^dej`k_]\Z

ydf|SjVeRT|}^Z[`_\^df\^[x\Y _[muw
Fruit & Specialty Crops 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.

Vegetable Inspection Room 1536-S, STOP 0240

Program Division Washington, DC 20250-0240

May 24, 2016 

 

AMENDMENT NO. 5

COMMODITY SPECIFICATION

FROZEN VEGETABLES – June 2014

The purpose of this amendment is to add an additional package size to section II. Individual 

Commodity Specifications, Item C., Frozen, Peas. Additions are shown in blue below:

II. Individual Commodity Specifications

C. Frozen, Peas

2. Net Weight 

a. 1/30 pounds per case

b. 1/30 pounds per case, Kosher

c. 12/2.5 pound containers per case

Frozen 

Vegetables

WBSCM Material Primary Container Secondary Container

Peas (12/2.5 lb.) 110763 7 15001 10763 3 1 07 15001 10763 0

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.
AMS Boneless Beef Supplier Pathogen Performance - Fiscal Year: 20231/,2/

E. coli O157:H73/ Salmonella4/

Supplier

# Lots Produced

 (% of Total) # Positive % Positive # Positive % Positive

S1 516 (2.1) 0 0 16 3.10

S2 - - - - -

S4 12,140 (48.9) 9 0.07 199 1.64

S5 - - - - -

S6 1,263 (5.1) 0 0 7 0.55

S10 4,495 (18.1) 0 0 1 0.02

S11 114 (0.5) 0 0 1 0.88

S14 2,633 (10.6) 0 0 5 0.19

S21 890 (3.6) 0 0 13 1.46

S29 1,611 (6.5) 0 0 7 0.43

S43 477 (1.9) 0 0 23 4.82

S44 598 (2.4) 0 0 0 0

S49 18 (0.1) 0 0 0 0

S50 82 (0.3) 0 0 0 0

Total 24,837 (100.0) 9 0.04 272 1.10

1/A full description of the boneless beef purchase program specification is available at https://www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food/product-specs#Beef. 2/Production Dates: October 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023. 3/E. coli O157:H7 Critical Limit: Positive (+) Result / 325g. 4/Salmonella Critical Limit: Positive (+) Result / 325g.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-10-0000231 06-JAN-2011 09:12 AM

NO. SCPW-10-0000231
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I
BYRON SAY, Petitioner,

vs. CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. SP 10-1-0024)
ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ. and Circuit Judge Garibaldi, assigned by reason of vacancy) Upon consideration of petitioner Byron Say's petition for a writ of mandamus and the papers in support, it appears that petitioner's September 28, 2010 "Motion to Compel [the circuit] Court to Answer [the May 17, 2010 petition]" was responded to by the circuit court, on October 13, 2010, by a memorandum from the legal documents branch. Accordingly, petitioner fails to demonstrate that the circuit court is not responding to the May 17, 2010 petition and that he is entitled to extraordinary relief. See Kema v. Gaddis , 91 Hawai ' i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear andindisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action.). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for a writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, January 6, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Colette Y. Garibaldi

2
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00248

- CV

DANIEL CHRISTOPHER TAYLOR

v. BERGSTROM, INC.
On Appeal from the 343rd District Court of Bee County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. B

- 18

- 1628

- CV

- C

- 1

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consid ered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. June 15, 2023