alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of BLACKWATER MIDSTREAM CORP. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald
St. Pierre, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.





August 19, 2008



By:       /s/  Donald St. Pierre
         -----------------------------------
         Donald St. Pierre
         Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

					NO. 2-02-273-CV

CONSECO FINANCE SERVICING CORP.       	APPELLANT

F/K/A GREEN TREE FINANCIAL 

SERVICING CORPORATION        

	V.

J&J MOBILE HOMES, INC. D/B/A SELECT HOMES	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM THE 271ST DISTRICT COURT OF WISE COUNTY

	----------

	ORDER

	----------

	The court has been notified that a petition for bankruptcy has been filed by Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. on December 17, 2002 in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Cause No. 02-49676.  Accordingly, this appeal is suspended.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. 

	For administrative purposes, this cause is STAYED and will be treated as a closed case.  It may be reinstated on prompt motion by any party showing that the stay has been lifted and specifying what further action, if any, is required from this court.  See id. 8.3.

	The clerk of this court is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the attorneys of record, the trial court judge, and the trial court clerk. 

	DATED January 6, 2003.

							PER CURIAM 

PANEL A:   LIVINGSTON, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rand Logistics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2007 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: August 13, 2007


                                                       /s/ Joseph W. McHugh, Jr.
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Joseph W. McHugh, Jr.
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
No. 98-10720 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES -COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10720 Conference Calendar

CHARLES EDWARD MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ED KING, Judge; ALYSIA ANN HEROD; U.S. ATTORNEY; JOHN HEROD, III; ASHLEY HEROD; MARY ELLEN YOUNG, Defendants-Appellees, JOHN MOORE, Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CV-682-P

- - - - - - - - - - February 16, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Charles Edward Moore, Texas prisoner #824496, appeals from the dismissal of his civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that the defendants violated his federal constitutional rights under color of state law. Moore has failed to allege that the district court erred by dismissing his claims as to all of the defendants except Judge King and Judge Young. He has abandoned his appeal as to these unargued claims. SeeNo. 98-10720 -2- Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Moore’s remaining claims lack arguable merit because they are barred by the doctrine of judicial immunity or fail to allege a violation of Moore’s federal constitutional rights. See Mays v. Sudderth , 97 F.3d 107, 110-11 (5th Cir. 1996)(judges have absolute immunity for judicial acts performed in judicial proceedings even if the action taken was in error, done maliciously, or exceeded his authority, unless the act was taken in the clear absence of all jurisdiction). Moore’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous.
See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Moore’s motions for appointment of counsel, a temporary restraining order, and declaratory relief are DENIED.
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED.
----

**EXHIBIT 99.6**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Greg Fenton, Chief Executive Officer of Zentek Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

a. the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

b. the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 29, 2022

 

|   | By:                                |
|--------|------------------------------------|
|   |                               |
|   | ***/s/ Greg Fenton***              |
|   | Name: **Greg Fenton**              |
|   | Title: **Chief Executive Officer** |

----
MELVIN HICKS

,
Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,
Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 4102

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 9, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Suwannee County

. Paul S. Bryan , Judge

.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Jessica J. Yeary, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Matthew Pavese and Robert Charles Lee, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS

, WINOKUR

, and JAY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
# Pollard-Kelley Auditing Services,
Inc......................................................................

#### Auditing Services
                                                  3250 West Market
St, Suite 307, Fairlawn, OH 44333 330-836-2558











### Report of
Independent Certified Public Accountants







Board of Directors

Falcon Target, Inc.



We have reviewed the accompanying balance sheets
of Falcon Target, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006 and
the related statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and
cash flows for the three-month and six-month and since inception
periods then ended.  These interim financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company’s management.



We conducted our review in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.  A review
of interim financial statements consists principally of applying
analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for
financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope
than an audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board, the object of which is the expression of
an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.



The Company has not
generated significant revenues or profits to date.  This factor among
others may indicate the Company will be unable to continue as a going
concern.  The Company’s continuation as a going concern depends
upon its ability to generate sufficient cash flow to conduct its
operations and its ability to obtain additional sources of capital
and financing.  The accompanying consolidated financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
this uncertainty.



Based on our review, we
are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to
the accompanying financial statements in order for them to be in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles accepted in
the United States of America.



Pollard-Kelley Auditing
Services, Inc.



/S/ Pollard-Kelley
Auditing Services, Inc.



February 14, 2007

Fairlawn, Ohio

# Pollard-Kelley
Auditing Services, Inc......................................................................

#### Auditing Services
                                                  3250 West Market
St, Suite 307, Fairlawn, OH 44333 330-836-2558











### 

February 28, 2007



Board of Directors

Falcon Target, Inc.



We hereby consent to
the incorporation of our opinion dated February 14, 2007 in the 10Q
of FalconTarget, Inc Corp for the three months ended December 31,
2006.



Very truly yours,

Pollard-Kelley Auditing
Services, Inc.

/s/ MALCOLM POLLARD

Malcolm L. Pollard

Vice-President
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 415 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 415

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Recognizing National Homeownership Month and the importance of 
                  homeownership in the United States.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 415

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the President has issued a proclamation proclaiming June 2002 as 
        National Homeownership Month;
Whereas owning a home represents the American dream for our Nation's families;
Whereas the national homeownership rate has increased to 67.8 percent, higher 
        than at any other time in history for all demographic groups, and 
        homeownership rates among minority families are increasing faster than 
        such rates for the population as a whole;
Whereas the purchase of a home is oftentimes a family's largest personal 
        investment;
Whereas homeownership provides economic stability and security for homeowners 
        and their communities by allowing homeowners to build wealth over the 
        life of the home and have a greater stake in local schools, civic 
        organizations, and churches;
Whereas improving homeownership opportunities requires the commitment and 
        cooperation of private, nonprofit, and public sectors, including the 
        Federal Government and State and local governments; and
Whereas the current policies of the United States Government and the Congress 
        encourage homeownership and should continue to do so in the future: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) fully supports the goals and ideals of National 
        Homeownership Month; and
            (2) recognizes the importance of homeownership in building 
        strong communities and families in the United States.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 17, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board; Regular Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board (Board).

# DATE AND TIME:

The meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on January 19, 2012, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dale L. Aultman, Secretary to the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available). In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

## Open Session

### A. Approval of Minutes

    - December 8, 2011

### B. New Business

    - Report on Investment Portfolio
    - Review of Insurance Premium Rates
    - Overview of Communications Crisis Plan with Porter Novelli

Dated: January 12, 2012.

Dale L. Aultman,

Secretary, Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board.

[FR Doc. 2012-864 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6710-01-P
Michigan Supreme

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 16, 2015 

# Order

June 16 , 2015

15105 3 ( 78 )

CITY OF HOLLAND

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

,

v

CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY

, Defendant

- Appell ant

. SC: 15105 3

COA: 3155 41

Ottawa CC: 12

- 002758

- CZ

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan Municipal Electric

Association (MMEA) to participate as amici curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief

submitted by the MMEA on June 10, 2015, is accepted for filing.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHAYO BRIGGS, a Male individual;

ABRAHAM VEGA MORENO,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST

COMPANY, a National Banking

Association as Trustee for Morgan Stanley

ABS Capital Inc, Home Equity Trust

2005-HE7, Erroneously Sued As Deutsche

Bank National Trust Company; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-55615

D.C. No. 5:12-cv-01286-PSGFFM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2015** 

Before: GOODWIN, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Chayo Briggs and Abraham Vega Moreno appeal pro se from the district

FILED

APR 30 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
court’s judgments in their action alleging violations of state and federal law in

connection with a non-judicial foreclosure. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the district court’s dismissal for

failure to comply with its local rules. Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir.

1995) (per curiam). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing plaintiffs’ claims

against defendants Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., JP Morgan Chase Bank,

N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., and WMC Mortgage

Corporation because plaintiffs failed to oppose these defendants’ motions to

dismiss. See C.D. Cal. R. 7-9 (requiring the filing of an opposition or statement of

non-opposition to a motion to dismiss); C.D. Cal. R. 7-12 (providing that the

failure to file any required document may be deemed consent to the granting or

denial of the motion); Ghazali, 46 F.3d at 53-54 (setting forth factors to be

considered before dismissing an action for failure to follow the local rules,

affirming dismissal for failure to file opposition to motion to dismiss, and noting

that pro se litigants are bound by the rules of procedure).

We reject defendant WMC Mortgage Corporation’s argument that this court

lacks appellate jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(2) (“A

notice of appeal filed after the court announces a decision, sentence, or order–but

2 13-55615
before the entry of the judgment or order–is treated as filed on the date of and after

the entry.”)

Defendants Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., JP Morgan Chase Bank,

N.A., and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.’s Motion to Take

Judicial Notice, filed on December 17, 2013, is granted.

AFFIRMED.

3 13-55615
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 23, 2009 

0615 

Order 

 

June 23, 2009 

138695 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138695 

 COA: 290226 

Oakland CC: 07-217453-FC 

DOMINIC NARVELL NASH, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 19, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed December 29, 2015.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-01462-CV

IN THE INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF M.W.L.

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-11773

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Lang-Miers, and Schenck

Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers

Before the Court is appellant the City of Dallas’s December 15, 2015 motion to dismiss 

the appeal and issue the mandate in this case. The City states that it has reached a settlement of 

all disputed claims with appellee Rhonda Hunter and no longer wishes to pursue the appeal. In 

accordance with the parties’ agreement, we grant the motion, dismiss the appeal, and direct the 

Clerk of the Court to issue the mandate forthwith. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

141462F.P05

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST AND PROTECTION 

OF M.W.L.

No. 05-14-01462-CV 

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-11773.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers, 

Justices Bridges and Schenck participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee Rhonda Hunter recover her costs of this appeal from 

appellant the City of Dallas. 

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to issue the mandate forthwith.

Judgment entered this 29th day of December, 2015.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50020

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE GUADALUPE JUAREZ-RIVERA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-95-CR-32(1)

- - - - - - - - - -

August 30, 1996

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Guadalupe Juarez-Rivera appeals his convictions for

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana,

conspiracy to import marijuana, possession with intent to

distribute marijuana, and importing marijuana. He contends that 

the prosecutor violated his Sixth Amendment right to compulsory

process by intimidating his prospective witness into refusing to

testify on his behalf, the district court erred in allowing that 
No. 96-50020

- 2 -

witness to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege against selfincrimination, the witness should have been granted immunity by

the district court, and the district court abused its discretion

in refusing to allow an alleged exculpatory statement made by the

witness into evidence. 

Our review of the record and the arguments and authorities

convinces us that no reversible error was committed. The

prosecutor’s comments to Juarez-River’s prospective witness do

not rise to the level of a due process violation. See United

States v. Viera, 839 F.2d 1113, 1115 (5th Cir. 1988) (en banc). 

There was no abuse of discretion in the district court's deferral

to the witness’s invocation of the Fifth Amendment. United

States v. Follin, 979 F.2d 369, 374 (5th Cir. 1992), cert.

denied, 509 U.S. 908 (1993). The district court did not abuse

its discretion in refusing to admit into evidence the alleged

exculpatory statement. United States v. Campbell, 73 F.3d 44, 47

(5th Cir. 1996). Finally, we do not consider Juarez-Rivera’s

argument that his witness should have been granted immunity

because the argument is not adequately briefed. See L & A

Contracting Co. v. Southern Concrete Serv., Inc., 17 F.3d 106,

113 (5th Cir. 1994).

Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.