Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 163 / Thursday, August 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules 52115 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This proposed regulation is 

within the scope of that authority as it 

would amend Class E airspace in the 

Macon, GA, area. 

This proposal would be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1E, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9W, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 8, 2012, effective 

September 15, 2012, is amended as 

follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas 

extending upward from 700 feet or more 

above the surface of the earth. 

* * * * * 

ASO GA E5 Macon, GA [Amended] 

Middle Georgia Regional Airport, GA 

(Lat. 32°41′34′′ N., long. 83°38′57′′ W.) 

Macon Downtown Airport 

(Lat. 32°49′18′′ N., long. 83°33′43′′ W.) 

Robins AFB 

(Lat. 32°38′25′′ N., long. 83°35′31′′ W.) 

Perry-Houston County Airport 

(Lat. 32°30′38′′ N., long. 83°46′02′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 7.8-mile 

radius of Middle Georgia Regional Airport, 

and within a 8.8-mile radius of Macon 

Downtown Airport, and within a 7-mile 

radius of Robins AFB, and within a 9.8-mile 

radius of Perry-Houston County Airport. 

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on August 

16, 2013. 

Kip B. Johns, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern 

Service Center, Air Traffic Organization. 

[FR Doc. 2013–20504 Filed 8–21–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0681; Airspace 

Docket No. 13–AEA–15] 

Proposed Amendment of Class E 

Airspace; Olean, NY 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

amend Class E Airspace at Olean, NY, 

as the Olean Non-Directional Beacon 

(NDB) has been decommissioned, 

requiring airspace redesign at 

Cattaraugus County-Olean Airport. This 

action would enhance the safety and 

airspace management of Instrument 

Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the 

airport. This action also would update 

the geographic coordinates of the 

airport. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before October 7, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposed rule to: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey SE., 

Washington, DC 20590–0001; 

Telephone: 1–800–647–5527; Fax: 202– 

493–2251. You must identify the Docket 

Number FAA–2013–0681; Airspace 

Docket No. 13–AEA–15, at the 

beginning of your comments. You may 

also submit and review received 

comments through the Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Fornito, Operations Support Group, 

Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation 

Administration, P.O. Box 20636, 

Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 

305–6364. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

Interested persons are invited to 

comment on this rule by submitting 

such written data, views, or arguments, 

as they may desire. Comments that 

provide the factual basis supporting the 

views and suggestions presented are 

particularly helpful in developing 

reasoned regulatory decisions on the 

proposal. Comments are specifically 

invited on the overall regulatory, 

aeronautical, economic, environmental, 

and energy-related aspects of the 

proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA– 

2013–0681; Airspace Docket No. 13– 

AEA–15) and be submitted in triplicate 

to the Docket Management System (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number). You may also submit 

comments through the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

Persons wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this action must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to 

Docket No. FAA–2013–0681; Airspace 

Docket No. 13–AEA–15.’’ The postcard 

will be date/time stamped and returned 

to the commenter. 

All communications received before 

the specified closing date for comments 

will be considered before taking action 

on the proposed rule. The proposal 

contained in this notice may be changed 

in light of the comments received. A 

report summarizing each substantive 

public contact with FAA personnel 

concerned with this rulemaking will be 

filed in the docket. 

Availability of NPRMs 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded from and 

comments submitted through http://

www.regulations.gov. Recently 

published rulemaking documents can 

also be accessed through the FAA’s Web 

page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_

airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/

airspace_amendments/. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received, and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see the 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and 

5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal Holidays. An informal 

docket may also be examined between 

8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal Holidays 

at the office of the Eastern Service 

Center, Federal Aviation 

Administration, room 350, 1701 

Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia 

30337. 

Persons interested in being placed on 

a mailing list for future NPRM’s should 

contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking, 

(202) 267–9677, to request a copy of 

Advisory circular No. 11–2A, Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking distribution 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
52116 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 163 / Thursday, August 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

System, which describes the application 

procedure. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is considering an 

amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to amend 

Class E airspace extending upward from 

700 feet above the surface at Cattaraugus 

County-Olean Airport, Olean, NY. 

Airspace reconfiguration to within a 10- 

mile radius of the airport is necessary 

due to the decommissioning of the 

Olean NDB, and cancellation of the NDB 

approach, and for continued safety and 

management of IFR operations at the 

airport. The geographic coordinates of 

the airport would be adjusted to 

coincide with the FAAs aeronautical 

database. 

Class E airspace designations are 

published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA 

Order 7400.9W, dated August 8, 2012, 

and effective September 15, 2012, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designation 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. It, 

therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under Executive 

Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant 

rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies 

and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 

26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant 

preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation 

as the anticipated impact is so minimal. 

Since this is a routine matter that will 

only affect air traffic procedures and air 

navigation, it is certified that this 

proposed rule, when promulgated, will 

not have a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. This proposed 

rulemaking is promulgated under the 

authority described in Subtitle VII, Part, 

A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This proposed regulation is 

within the scope of that authority as it 

would amend Class E airspace at 

Cattaraugus County-Olean Airport, 

Olean, NY. 

This proposal would be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1E, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9W, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 8, 2012, effective 

September 15, 2012, is amended as 

follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas 

extending upward from 700 feet or more 

above the surface of the earth. 

* * * * * 

AEA NY E5 Olean, NY [Amended] 

Cattaraugus County-Olean Airport, NY 

(Lat. 42°14′28′′ N., long. 78°22′17′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 10-mile radius 

of Cattaraugus County-Olean Airport. 

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on August 

16, 2013 . 

Kip B. Johns, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern 

Service Center, Air Traffic Organization. 

[FR Doc. 2013–20511 Filed 8–21–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND 

HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 

29 CFR Part 2200 

Request for Public Comment on a 

Review Level Alternative Dispute 

Resolution Program 

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health 

Review Commission. 

ACTION: Request for comment. 

SUMMARY: The Occupational Safety and 

Health Review Commission invites the 

public to comment on the potential 

development of an alternative dispute 

resolution program at the review level. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

submitted on or before October 21, 

2013. 

ADDRESSES: Submit all written 

comments, identified by the title 

‘‘Settlement Part Public Comment,’’ by 

mail or hand delivery to John X. 

Cerveny, Deputy Executive Secretary, 

Occupational Safety and Health Review 

Commission, 1120 20th Street NW., 

Washington, DC 20036–3457, by fax to 

202–606–5050, or by email to 

fedreg@oshrc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

X. Cerveny, Deputy Executive Secretary, 

Occupational Safety and Health Review 

Commission, 1120 20th Street NW., 

Ninth Floor, Washington, DC 20036– 

3457; Telephone (202) 606–5706; email 

address: fedreg@oshrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Occupational Safety and Health Review 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) 

adjudicates contested citations issued 

by the U.S. Department of Labor’s 

Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration (‘‘OSHA’’) at the trial 

level before an administrative law judge 

and, if directed for review, before the 

Commissioners on appeal. The 

Commission initiated an alternative 

dispute resolution (‘‘ADR’’) program at 

the trial level, known as the Settlement 

Part program, in 1999. The Settlement 

Part program, codified at 29 CFR 

2200.120, employs both mandatory and 

voluntary procedures to promote case 

settlement. Under the program, an 

administrative law judge acts as a 

settlement judge and oversees the ADR 

process. If a case does not settle, an 

administrative law judge who did not 

act as the settlement judge typically 

hears the case and issues a decision, 

which may be appealed to the 

Commissioners at the review level. An 

ADR program does not currently exist at 

the Commission’s review level, but the 

Commission is exploring the feasibility 

of instituting such a program. 

At the Commission’s request, ADR 

experts at Indiana University School of 

Public and Environmental Affairs 

recently completed a study of the 

Settlement Part program at the judges’ 

level. Upon studying both empirical 

data and survey responses from internal 

and external participants, Indiana 

University deemed the program 

‘‘successful’’ and noted that the 

Commission ‘‘has done an admirable job 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS