alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8527]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ID-6835-001]


 Manning, Richard W.; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on April 2, 2012, Richard W. Manning submitted for 
filing, an application for authority to hold interlocking positions, 
pursuant to section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 825d(b) 
(2008) and section 45.8 of Title 18 of the Code of Federal Regulations, 
18 CFR 45.8.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b1f7f4e3f2fedfddd8dfd4e2c4c1c1dec3c5f1d7d4c3d29fd6dec7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1a5c5f485955747673747f496f6a6a75686e5a7c7f6879347d756c">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 23, 2012.

    Dated: April 2, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8527 Filed 4-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Order entered July 30, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01331-CV

FRANKLIN COX, Appellant

V.

TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION AND LINCOLN TECHNICAL AND UCAC 

INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-01261

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this appeal is past due. By postcard dated April 25, 2018, we 

notified Court Reporter Vielica Dobbins the reporter’s record was overdue. On May 2, 2018 and 

May 3, 2018, we received letters directed to Ms. Dobbins requesting preparation of the reporter’s 

record. It is not clear whether appellant sent the request for the reporter’s record to Ms. Dobbins. 

Accordingly, we ORDER Vielica Dobbins, Official Court Reporter for the 134th Judicial 

District Court, to file, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order either (1) the reporter’s 

record; (2) written verification no hearings were recorded; or (3) written verification that 

appellant has not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record. We notify appellant that if 

we receive verification the reporter’s record has not been requested or payment or payment 
arrangements have not been made, we may order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s 

record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). 

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to:

Honorable Dale Tillery 

Presiding Judge

134th Judicial District Court

Vielica Dobbins

Official Court Reporter

134th Judicial District Court

All parties 

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert K. Moskovitz, Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 15, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert K. Moskovitz                              
|                        |  |  |  | Name: Robert K. Moskovitz                            
|                        |  |  |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ Sean P. McGrathName:
    
    Sean P. McGrathTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General Partner
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MARY J.B. EIDELMAN, ESQUIRE,

Appellant

v.

TIMONEY KNOX, LLP, RICHARD L. 

CAPLAN, ESQ., THE LAW OFFICES OF 

TODD MOSSER, PLLC, TODD MOSSER, 

ESQ. III, AND PAUL ABELN,

Appellees

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 68 MAP 2016

Appeal from the Order of the Lehigh 

County Court of Common Pleas, Civil 

Division, at No. 2016-C-132 dated May 

31, 2016.

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: May 22, 2017

AND NOW, this 22nd day of May, 2017, the order of the Lehigh County Court of 

Common Pleas dated May 31, 2016 is REVERSED based on our decision in Villani v. 

Seibert, 66 MAP 2016 (Pa. April 26, 2017), and the matter is REMANDED for further 

proceedings. 

The Motion to Quash is DENIED.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY W ASHINGTON , D . C . 20460

Mr. J. Michael Brown Ohio Valley Electric Corporation Indiana -Kentucky Electric Corporation 3932 U.S. Route 23 Piketon, Ohio 45661 Dear Mr. Brown: 

## JUl 3 1 2013 OFFICE OF WA T ER

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has received your request for plant-specific information, including estimated compliance costs and pollutant removals, related to the proposed re visions to the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category (Docket 

### 10 No . EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819). In response to your request, please fmd enclosed a disc containing one file and six attachments for each plant for which costs/removals are being provided. The file and attachments present the input values and the costs and pollutant removals for the requested plants, as well as additional information regarding EPA's estimation of these values. The EPA is providing costs and pollutant removals for the following plants: • Kyger Creek Station (00771); and • C lifty Creek S tation (05318). The informa t ion provided in the enclosed disc may contain information that was claimed by your company's plants as confidential business information (CBI) in response to the Questionnairefor the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines. The EPA is not responsible for the release of this CBI if you or others in your company provide these attachments to other parties. If you have any questions regarding these estimates, please contact me at (202) 566- 1755 or alicea.jezebele@epa. gov. Thank you for your interest in the steam electric effluent guidelines rulemaking process.

Jezebele Alicea Virella Engineer ing and Analysis Division (4303T) Enclosures I n t erne t Ad d re ss ( U R L) • http ://www. epa .gov Recycled / Recyclable · P rin ted w i th Vegetab l e O il B ased Inks o n 1 00% Postcons umer , P rocess Ch l o rin e Free Recycl ed Pape r
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **3 -**  **7801**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , P laintiff

- Appell ee ,
v. ANTONIO KEITH BATTLE , Defendant

- Appell ant .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Ea stern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Robert G. Doumar , Senior District Judge. ( 2 :1 2

- cr - 000 01

- RGD

- DEM

- 1; 2 :13

- cv - 00298

- RGD )

Submitted : May 22, 2014 Decided: May 28, 2014

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Antonio Keith Battle, Appellant Pro Se
. Sherrie Scott Capotosto , Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk , Virginia , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER C URIAM: Antonio Keith Battle seeks to appeal the district court’s order s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion and his subsequent motion for reconsideration . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that th e motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Battle has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabi lity and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2021-2 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify andrepresent that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofAugust 25, 2021, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2021-2 and Wilmington Trust, National Association (the “Agreement”) duringthe period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By: /s/ Marc WomackName: Marc WomackTitle: EVP, Head of OperationsDate: March 31, 2023
 
By: /s/ Vikas GuptaName: Vikas GuptaTitle: TreasurerDate: March 31, 2023**
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ Freddie M. KotekName:
    
    Freddie M. KotekTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner
In The Matter Of:

EPA Bristol Bay Public Meeting -- Anchorage, Vol. II

August 12, 2014

Midnight Sun Court Reporters

511 W. 9th Ave.

Anchorage, AK 99501

Ph. 907-258-7100

Fax 907-276-6727

To open files, click on the desired file type in bookmark on left.

For quick saving or searching multiple files, click attachments tab (or paperclip) on left.

For best viewing/searching, use Adobe Reader/Acrobat ver. 9 or higher

(www.adobe.com).
[No. 17447-2-II.

Division Two.

July 26, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Dennis Dean Wisch, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 92-1-01041-1, Edwin L. Poyfair, J., entered July 15, 1993. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Turner, J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Armstrong, JJ.
[Nos. 17217-8-II; 18256-4-II; 19052-4-II.

Division Two.

June 28, 1996.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Aldoren F. Kauzlarich, *Appellant,*and Raelene Jo Adolf, *Respondent.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 85-5-00087-7, Terry D. Sebring, J., entered May 28,1993. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Bridge-water, J., concurred in by Turner and Armstrong, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ James A. CalderJames A. CalderChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  43
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50020 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE GUADALUPE JUAREZ-RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-95-CR-32(1)

- - - - - - - - - - August 30, 1996 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose Guadalupe Juarez-Rivera appeals his convictions for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana, conspiracy to import marijuana, possession with intent to distribute marijuana, and importing marijuana. He contends that the prosecutor violated his Sixth Amendment right to compulsory process by intimidating his prospective witness into refusing to testify on his behalf, the district court erred in allowing thatNo. 96-50020 - 2 -witness to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege against selfincrimination, the witness should have been granted immunity by the district court, and the district court abused its discretion in refusing to allow an alleged exculpatory statement made by the witness into evidence. Our review of the record and the arguments and authorities convinces us that no reversible error was committed. The prosecutor’s comments to Juarez-River’s prospective witness do not rise to the level of a due process violation. See United States v. Viera , 839 F.2d 1113, 1115 (5th Cir. 1988) (en banc). There was no abuse of discretion in the district court's deferral to the witness’s invocation of the Fifth Amendment. United States v. Follin , 979 F.2d 369, 374 (5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied , 509 U.S. 908 (1993). The district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to admit into evidence the alleged exculpatory statement. United States v. Campbell , 73 F.3d 44, 47 (5th Cir. 1996). Finally, we do not consider Juarez-Rivera’s argument that his witness should have been granted immunity because the argument is not adequately briefed. See L & A Contracting Co. v. Southern Concrete Serv., Inc. , 17 F.3d 106, 113 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly+ report of GlobalOptions Group, Inc., (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey
      O. Nyweide, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





1.
            The
                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





August
                12, 2008
            /s/
                Jeffrey O. NyweideName:
            Jeffrey
                O. NyweideTitle:
            Chief
                Financial Officer, Executive Vice
              President
                – Corporate Development, and
              Secretary
                (Principal Financial Officer and
              Principal
                Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT
31.4

CERTIFICATION



I, Ellen Scipta, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on
Form 10-K/A of Fresh Vine Wine, Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: May 2, 2022 | /s/ Ellen Scipta                                     
|----------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|                  | Ellen Scipta                                         
|                  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 610 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 610

  Urging the release of information regarding the September 11, 2001, 
               terrorist attacks upon the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            August 21, 2018

Mr. Blumenthal (for himself, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Schumer, Mrs. Gillibrand, 
  Mr. Murphy, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Markey, Mr. Booker, Mr. 
 Rubio, and Mr. Sanders) submitted the following resolution; which was 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

                           September 26, 2018

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Urging the release of information regarding the September 11, 2001, 
               terrorist attacks upon the United States.

Whereas tens of thousands of pages of documents relating to the September 11, 
        2001, terrorist attacks upon the United States remain classified by the 
        Federal Government;
Whereas the Federal Government may properly classify and control access to 
        information in order to protect sources and methods of collecting 
        critical information in defense of the country and the people of the 
        United States;
Whereas the contents of these documents are necessary for a full public 
        understanding of the events and circumstances surrounding the September 
        11, 2001, terrorist attacks;
Whereas the decision to maintain the classified status of many of these 
        documents prevents the people of the United States from having access to 
        information about the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, including 
        the involvement of certain foreign governments in the attacks; and
Whereas the people of the United States and the families of the victims of the 
        September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks deserve full and public disclosure 
        of the events surrounding the attacks: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) documents related to the events of September 11, 2001, 
        should be declassified to the greatest extent possible; and
            (2) the survivors, the families of the victims, and the 
        people of the United States deserve answers about the events 
        and circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001, terrorist 
        attacks upon the United States.
                                 <all>
```
ORIGINAI 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

No. DA 23- 0244 

KIRK EAKIN and CATHY EAKIN, 

Husband and wife, 

Plaintiffs and Appellants, 

v. 

STATE OF MONTANA, and KEVIN DOWNS, 

Lewis and Clarky County Attorney, 

Defendants and Appellees. 

ORDER 

Upon consideration of Appellants' motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellants are granted an 

extension of time to and including November 17, 2023, within which to 

prepare, file, and serve the opening brief on appeal. 

tiL d 

DATED this day of October, 2023. 

For the Court, 

Chief Justice 

10/23/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0244