alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1  Certifications  I, Mike Mckeever, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2021-P4 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d- 18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following  unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Computershare Trust Company, National  Association.  Date: March 29, 2023  Mike Mckeever   President   Carvana Receivables Depositor LLC   (senior officer in charge of securitization)  /s/ Mike Mckeever
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/01 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    /s/ FREDDIE M. KOTEKName:
    Freddie M. KotekTitle:
    Chairman of the Board of Directors,Chief Executive Officer and President of the Managing General PartnerDate:
    November 12, 2010
NO. 12-10-00255-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

DASHUN HATCHER,

APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 87TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

T.D.C.J.-I.D.,

BRAD LIVINGSTON AND

M. CAROL GARDNER, ' ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEES

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This pro se in forma pauperis appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with 

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The judgment in 

this case was signed on May 11, 2010. Appellant, DaShun Hatcher, timely filed a notice 

of appeal that failed to contain the information required by Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure 9.5 and 25.1(e), i.e., a certificate of service showing service on all parties to 

the trial court's judgment.

On August 9, 2010, Hatcher was notified pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with rules 9.5 

and 25.1(e). He was further notified that unless he filed an amended notice of appeal on

or before September 8, 2010, the appeal would be referred to the court for dismissal. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The deadline for filing an amended notice of appeal has passed, 

and Hatcher has not corrected his defective notice of appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is 

dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3(c); Feist v. Berg, No. 12-04-00004-CV, 2004 WL 252785, at *1 (Tex. App.-

Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied); Feist v. Hubert, No. 12-03-00442-CV, 2004 WL 

252285, at *1 (Tex. App.-Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied).

Opinion delivered September 15, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

m 00-50223

_______________

ROBERT STOVALL,

Plaintiff,

JARY M. GANSKE AND SHIRLEY B. GANSKE,

Intervenor PlaintiffsCounter DefendantsAppellees,

VERSUS

WRS GROUP, LTD.,

AND

DONNA SPENCE,

INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF WAYMAN R. SPENCE, DECEASED,

DefendantsIntervenor DefendantsCounter PlaintiffsAppellants,

SCOTT SALMANS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(W-99-CV-239)

_________________________

January 3, 2001
2

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before POLITZ, SMITH, and PARKER,

Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The petition for rehearing isGRANTED IN

PART. The opinion issued on December 7,

2000, is WITHDRAWN, and the following is

substituted:

This is essentially a dispute over whether

certain matters were settled with finality. We

have reviewed the briefs, the record, and the

applicable law and have heard and considered

the oral arguments of counsel. 

We conclude that the matters in dispute

were in fact settled by release. Moreover, appellants have failed to demonstrate a material

issue of fact with respect to their contract

claim. The district court correctly entered a

take-nothing judgment and denied the intervenors’ claims as moot.

AFFIRMED.

In all other respects, the petition for rehearing is DENIED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has

determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the

limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.
#### David HATFIELD, Appellant, v. UNIVERSAL SERVICES, INC., A Texas Corporation, Appellee.

No. 4743.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

Feb. 6, 1981.

A. Lee Petersen, A. Lee Petersen, Inc., Anchorage, for appellant.

Clay A. Young, Delaney, Wiles, Moore, Hayes & Reitman, Inc., Anchorage, for ap-pellee.

Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ., and COOKE, Superior Court Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This is a “slip and fall” tort case.

The court’s instructions on appellee’s duty of care were adequate.

We are unpersuaded by appellant’s contention that in a case of this type the jury must be instructed as to how a reasonable *985person performs the activity of walking.1 Even if the requested instruction was a proper statement of the law, the failure to give it in this case was harmless, because the appellee was found not to have been negligent. *See*Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure 51(b), 61. Therefore, we must affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED.

1

. The instruction requested by appellant was: “The plaintiff in the exercise of reasonable care was not required to look at the floor in front of him as he walked. He may safely assume that the premises were in reasonably safe condition in the absence of any notice to the contrary.”
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Roebling Financial Corp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Frank J. Travea, III, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Janice A. Summers, Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

|  

 

/s/ Frank J. Travea, III                    |   |   |  

 

/s/ Janice A. Summers                                                          |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Frank J. Travea, III

President and Chief Executive Officer |   |   | Janice A. Summers

Senior Vice President, Chief Operating

Officer and Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

August 14, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 58 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 58

Congratulating the New England Patriots on their victory in Super Bowl 
                                  LI.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 10, 2017

   Ms. Warren (for herself, Ms. Collins, Mr. Markey, Mr. King, Mrs. 
 Shaheen, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Leahy, and Mr. Reed) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating the New England Patriots on their victory in Super Bowl 
                                  LI.

Whereas, on Sunday, February 5, 2017, the New England Patriots (in this preamble 
        referred to as the ``Patriots'') won Super Bowl LI by a score of 34 to 
        28, defeating the Atlanta Falcons in Houston, Texas;
Whereas, during the second half of Super Bowl LI, the Patriots scored 31 
        consecutive points, overcoming the largest deficit that any team has 
        overcome in Super Bowl history;
Whereas the victory in Super Bowl LI earned the Patriots their fifth Super Bowl 
        championship;
Whereas Tom Brady--

    (1) broke, tied, or extended several Super Bowl records in leading the 
Patriots to their fifth Super Bowl victory; and

    (2) was named the Super Bowl Most Valuable Player for a record fourth 
time;

Whereas James White set new Super Bowl records by catching 14 passes and scoring 
        20 points, including the game-winning touchdown run in overtime;
Whereas Bill Belichick won an unprecedented fifth Super Bowl title as a head 
        coach;
Whereas the performance of the defense in the second half was critical to the 
        Patriots' victory in Super Bowl LI, and key plays by Trey Flowers, 
        Dont'a Hightower, and Alan Branch contributed to shutting out the 
        Atlanta Falcons for the final 23 minutes and 36 seconds of regulation;
Whereas Julian Edelman hauled in a miracle catch for the ages to continue a 
        fourth quarter drive by the Patriots, helping to send the game to 
        overtime;
Whereas Robert Kraft, the owner of the Patriots, eloquently stated, ``Two years 
        ago, we won our fourth Super Bowl down in Arizona and I told our fans 
        that was the sweetest one of all. . . . But I want to say to our fans, 
        to our brilliant coaching staff, our amazing players who were so 
        spectacular, this is unequivocally the sweetest''; and
Whereas the Patriots ``did their job'' again and took ``no days off'', 
        delivering a fifth Lombardi Trophy to New England: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate congratulates the New England Patriots on 
their dramatic victory in Super Bowl LI.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher R. Huber, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                                                      
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 10, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ CHRISTOPHER R. HUBER
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                    |  | Christopher R. Huber                                 
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                   |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and, |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the                Report. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                John P. Keefe                                          |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| John                P. Keefe, Principal Executive Officer            |
|                                                                      |
| /s/                Mark A. Edwards                                        |
| Mark                A. Edwards, PrincipalFinancial                Officer |
|                                                                      |
| Date:                August 20, 2008                                      |

----
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT








I, Ryan M. Hershberger, certify that:





(a)    A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 has been made under my supervision.





(b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.








Dated March 19, 2024


/s/ Ryan M. HershbergerRyan M. HershbergerAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2022-A
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of John Deere Capital Corporation



I, Katrin Watkins, Assistant Secretary of John Deere Capital Corporation,
state:



A review of John Deere Capital Corporation’s activities for the
period from July 21, 2021 (the date of issuance of the John Deere Owner Trust 2021-B transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation
AB) through October 31, 2021 (the “Reporting Period”) and of John Deere Capital Corporation’s performance under the
Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 21, 2021 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables LLC and John Deere
Owner Trust 2021-B has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, John Deere Capital Corporation
has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.







|Date: January 10, 2022 |     | John Deere Capital Corporation
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------
|                       |     |                               
|                       |     |                               
|                       | By: | /s/ Katrin Watkins            
|                       |     | Katrin Watkins                
|                       |     | Assistant Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8654]



[[Page 21560]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

April 5, 2012.

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Tuesday, April 17, 2012.

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 
Avenue NW., Washington, DC

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will hear oral argument in the 
matter Long Branch Energy v. Secretary of Labor, Docket Nos. WEVA 2009-
1492-R, et al. (Issues include whether the judge erred in denying 
motions to dismiss late-filed petitions for assessment of civil 
penalties.)
    Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean Ellen (202) 434-9950/(202) 
708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Emogene Johnson,
Administrative Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2012-8654 Filed 4-6-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed September 17, 2014.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D 14-2199

Lower Tribunal Nos. 13-23988, 13-25979

________________



### Manuel Herrera,

Petitioner,

vs.



### State of Florida, et al.,

Respondents.

A case of original jurisdiction

– Habeas Corpus.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public

Defender, for petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Robert Martinez Biswas, Assistant

Attorney General

, for respondents.

Before WELLS, SUAREZ, and SALTER, JJ.

SUAREZ, J.

Manuel Herrera seeks a writ of habeas corpus to remedy his detention

without bond. At the defendant’s appearance at the alias capias calendar, the trial

court failed to determine whether Herrera’s failure to appear in court for pre-trialsounding was willful, and failed to make the necessary findings that “no conditions

of release can reasonably protect the community from risk of physical harm to

persons or assure the presence of the accused at trial.” Art. I, § 14, Fla. Const.; §

907.041(4)(c), Florida Statutes (2014). See Blair v. State

, 59 So. 3d 387 (Fla.

2011). As such, we grant Herrera’s petition for writ of habeas corpus only insofar

as we remand to the trial court for an expedited bond hearing pursuant to section

907.041(4)(c), Florida Statutes (2014). The trial court’s determination shall

include, but is not limited to, Herrera’s willfulness in failing to appear at his

scheduled pre-trial sounding. Herrera shall remain in detention pending the

outcome of the hearing.

Petition granted; remanded for an expedited bond hearing.

This opinion shall take effect immediately notwithstanding the filing or

disposition of any motion for rehearing.

2
City of Alpena 

::.ViTf;;ENTOF 

••".SPORWiON 

..cTOFERATIOfiS 

•Si! m , ib A ^Q: 21 

Dear Elected Officials, 

I am writing this letter on behalf of all citizens and businesses of Northeast Michigan, in hopes 

that you will find it important enough to take a moment from your schedules to echo our 

concerns to the Department of Transportation. 

As background, the air service at the Alpena Regional Airport was not receiving federal 

assistance prior to the approved merger of Delta and Northwest Airlines. The events that 

followed started with Delta's announcement to pull their service from Alpena to Detroit. Since 

then, we have been searching for an airline that meets the minimum requirements for EAS 

funding from the federal government, as it seems there are no longer services available that can 

survive without it. We have been through three bidding cycles, exhausted thousands of dollars 

and countless hours to ensure that our community retains a suitable level of service, only to 

have the DOT lower the EAS criteria standards so they can relieve Delta from their promise to 

continue servicing small communities in America. 

Alpena, Michigan is not as "small town" as some might think. We have shown a steady 

increase in enplanements to over 20,000 annually in 2011. We are the home of the Thunder 

Bay National Marine Sanctuary, LaFarge Alpena Cement Plant, the World Center for Concrete 

Technology, the Alpena Combat Readiness Training Center, Alpena Regional Medical Center, 

Alpena Cancer Center, The Bay Athletic Club, Decorative Panels International, Alpena 

Biorefinery, and countless other businesses and attractions that require an airline with suitable 

seating capacity and ticketing agreements with a major airline in order to survive and prosper. 

We have made great strides in the last several weeks, but all tangible offers are hinging on one 

decision or another and we're told that it will take some time before any commitments can be 

made by the airlines that are considering an agreement with Alpena. I doubt that anyone could 

have imagined a time when it would be difficult to contract air service to a proven twentythousand travelers, but that time has come. We are asking that you help us ensure that our 

economy will continue to grow, by contacting the DOT and requesting that they reject the 

current bid as inadequate and open a fourth bidding cycle, as I have done in the enclosed 

document. 

I thank you all for your service to the great state of Michigan and United States of America. 

Your attention to our community is greatly appreciated. Please contact me with any questions. 

Sincerely, 

Matthew J. Waligora 

Mayor 

MiCMKJWSADVENSHORH
(a)  A
        review of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s activities and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2021, as amended (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as
        seller, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”) and sponsor, and Toyota Auto Receivables 2021-C Owner Trust, as issuer, during the year ended December 31, 2023 has been made under my supervision.
  (b)  To


        the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.
    /s/ James Schofield