alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON , D

.C

. 20460

Simon Lie and Tim Holey c/o Aerospace Industries Association 1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1700 Arlington , Virginia 22209-3928
Dear Mr. Lie and Mr. Holey : 

## FEB 1 7 2016 OFFICE OF A I R AND RADIAT I ON

I am writing in response to your letter of December 18 , 2015 to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Acting Assistant Administrator Janet McCabe ofthe Office ofAir and Radiation and Assistant Administrator James Jones ofthe Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, in which you requested EPA ' s expedited review and approval of the chemical 2- bromo-3 ,3 , 3-trifluoropropene (2-BTP) for handheld fire extinguishers on commercial aircraft. Your letter discussed the International Civil Aviation Organization ' s (ICAO ' s) requirement for halon-free handheld extinguishers in new aircraft type designs after December 31 , 2016

. You shared the concerns ofthe aircraft original equipment manufacturers within the ICCAIA Airworthiness Committee with meeting this deadline, given the time that they believe would be needed to develop , certify and introduce aviation-approved equipment using 2-BTP, and given pending decisions by EPA on its production and use
. EPA understands the importance to the industry of2-BTP as an option for use in aviation fire suppression applications and, in particular, the time constraints the industry is facing. As you may be aware , AMPAC originally submitted 2-BTP for r eview on September 25 , 2014 , to EPA ' s Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program in the Office ofAir and Radiation. As a new chemical , 2-BTP was also submitted as a Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) Premanufacture Notice (PMN) for review by EPA ' s New Chemicals Program in the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention

. Both programs have worked closely to coordinate our reviews , as is our practice when such reviews involve the same chemical. Both programs have also held numerous meetings with the submitter, AMPAC , to ensure the completeness of our information on 2-BTP and our understanding of its use. As a result, we are nearing completion of these reviews. The New Chemicals Program is in the process ofcompleting a TSCA section 5(e) consent order with the PMN submitter.

I nternet Address (URL) • http // www epa gov Recy cl e d /R ecyc la ble • Pnnted w1th Vegetable Oil Based I nks on 100% Postconsumer Process Chlonne Free Recycled PaperI appreciate your interest in our review and look forward to your continued cooperation in our efforts on ozone protection. Ifyou have further questions , please contact Cindy Newberg, Chief ofthe Alternatives and Emission Reduction Branch, at (202) 343-9729 or newberg.cindy@epa.gov, or Kenneth Moss , Team Leader for the New Chemicals Program, at (202) 564-9232 or moss.kenneth@epa.gov.

Sincerely,

Sarah Dunham, Director Office of Atmospheric Programs
## DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Energy Efficiency and

Renewable Energy

Rulemaking Title:

Alternative Efficiency Determination Methods and Alternate Rating

Methods

FDMS Docket ID: EERE

- 2011

- BT

- TP

- 0024

Document ID: EERE

- 2011

- BT

- TP

- 0024

- DRAFT

- 0034

Submitter Name: Mark V. Stanga

Organization: Daikin AC (Americas), Inc.



## This comment contain privileged and

confidential trade secrets and commercial or

financial information which is exempt from

disclosure under 5 U.S.C . 552(b)(4).

RESERVED

NO DOCUMENT
**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Thomas Kirchner, certify that: 

  1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of FalconTarget, Inc.;  

  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  

  3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  

  4) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  

  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; and  

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and  

  5) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  

  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and  

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.  

Date: November 15, 2005 

By:   /s/   Thomas Kirchner 

    Thomas Kirchner

    Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 673 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 673

       Recognizing the 80th anniversary of Ingalls Shipbuilding.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 11, 2018

 Mr. Wicker (for himself and Mrs. Hyde-Smith) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Recognizing the 80th anniversary of Ingalls Shipbuilding.

Whereas October 2018 marks the 80th anniversary of Ingalls Shipbuilding, a 
        shipbuilding corporation located in Pascagoula, Mississippi;
Whereas Ingalls Shipbuilding is the largest industrial employer in the State of 
        Mississippi, with nearly 12,000 shipbuilders that--

    (1) construct surface combatants, amphibious assault ships, and United 
States Coast Guard cutters; and

    (2) provide repair and maintenance services on United States Navy 
ships;

Whereas Ingalls Shipbuilding is the largest supplier to the United States Navy 
        of surface combatants and has built nearly 70 percent of the fleet of 
        warships of the United States Navy;
Whereas Ingalls Shipbuilding was founded in 1938 by Robert Ingersoll Ingalls on 
        the east bank of the Pascagoula River in the State of Mississippi;
Whereas since 1938, Ingalls Shipbuilding has provided the United States Navy, 
        United States Coast Guard, and other customers with the most reliable 
        and high-quality ships in the world;
Whereas the individuals who build ships at Ingalls Shipbuilding continue that 
        legacy of excellence;
Whereas Ingalls Shipbuilding provides 20,000 direct and indirect jobs in the 
        State of Mississippi;
Whereas Pascagoula is the home of the finest shipbuilders in the world;
Whereas Ingalls Shipbuilding contributes more than $1,000,000,000 to the economy 
        of the State of Mississippi annually; and
Whereas as of the date of this resolution, Ingalls Shipbuilding--

    (1) has 13 ships from 4 different classes under construction; and

    (2) will build for the United States Navy the LPD Flight II, the next 
class of amphibious transport dock landing ship: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes Ingalls Shipbuilding on the occasion of its 
        80th anniversary as a leader in the military shipbuilding 
        sector of the United States and an excellent corporate citizen; 
        and
            (2) extends best wishes to Ingalls Shipbuilding on that 
        auspicious occasion.
                                 <all>
```
H. Con. Res. 87 Agreed to May 22, 2001

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF RUNNING OF D.C. SPECIAL OLYMPICS

LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN THROUGH CAPITOL

GROUNDS.

On June 1, 2001, or on such other date as the Speaker of

the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and

Administration of the Senate may jointly designate, the 2001 District of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run

(in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through

the Capitol Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics

torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics summer games

at Gallaudet University in the District of Columbia.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be

necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the

restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946

(40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, advertisements,

displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other
H. Con. Res. 87—2

restrictions applicable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the

event.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Everest Consolidator Acquisition Corporation (the“Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 
Date: April 18, 2022  By: /s/Adam Dooley   Adam Dooley   Chief Executive Officer   *(principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)***
III

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 93

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 4, 2001

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of

Representatives and a conditional recess or adjournment

of the Senate.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Wednesday, April 4, 2001, or Thursday, April

4 5, 2001, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent

5 resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand
2

HCON 93 RDS

1 adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, April 24, 2001, or

2 until noon on the second day after Members are notified

3 to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent res4 olution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate

5 recesses or adjourns at the close of business on Friday,

6 April 6, 2001, Saturday, April 7, 2001, Sunday, April 8,

7 2001, or Monday, April 9, 2001, on a motion offered pur8 suant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader

9 or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon

10 on Monday, April 23, 2001, or until such time on that

11 day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his des12 ignee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon

13 on the second day after Members are notified to reassem14 ble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

15 whichever occurs first.

16 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

17 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

18 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead19 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

20 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

21 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives April 3, 2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-11325 Conference Calendar

JAMES BRIAN REED, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus STATE OF TEXAS; 352ND DISTRICT COURT; BONNIE SUDDERETH, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CV-661-Y

-------------------- February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * James Brian Reed appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit. He has failed to brief any of the district court’s bases for dismissal. Pro se litigants must comply with the requirements of
F ED . R. A PP . P. 28 that the appellant’s argument contain the reasons he deserves the requested relief with citation to authorities and parts of the record on which the appellant relies. Grant v. Cuellar , 59 F.3d 523, 524 (5th Cir. 1995). AsNo. 01-11325 -2- Reed’s brief does not satisfy the briefing requirements under
F ED . R. A PP . P. 28 and fails to identify any district court error, it is frivolous and is DISMISSED. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Worldtek Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Bernard Artz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By: /s/  Bernard Artz
         ------------------------
         Bernard Artz
         Chief Executive Officer
         November 29, 2004
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
FalconTarget, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

FalconTarget, Inc.

Date: May 20, 2009

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan

Serge Atlan

Chairman

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Company sanitized 

Does not contain Confidential Business 

Information (CBI)

Appendix D 

Draft Facility Report on Product Content
2010/15 PFOA Stewardship Program 

Draft Facility Report on Product Content 

I. CHEMICAL IDENTIFICATION

Identify the product (e.g fluoropolymer dispersion) for which you are submitting information: 

 

 Product name:___Fluorinated Surfactant(monomeric)_______

 

Product description (including concentrations of perfluoroalkyl chemicals 

 identified in Section IV below and year of production): 

All products under the name of “Fluorinated Surfactant (monomeric)” are 

considered to be precursors to PFOA and higher homologues.

II. COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

Identify the company and location of the facility submitting information: 

 

 Company name:_AGC SEIMI CHEMICAL CO.,LTD

 

 Site location:3-2-10,Chigasaki,Chigasaki City,Kanagawa,253-8585 Japan

 :2276-2,Nada,Hirai,Kashima City,Ibaraki,314-0012 Japan

Identify a company technical contact who can respond to inquiries about the information 

submitted: 

 Technical contact:_Shunji Odaka 

 Phone: _+81-467-82-4398____

 Address: 3-2-10,Chigasaki,Chigasaki City,Kanagawa,253-8585 Japan

III. PRODUCTION

Calendar year for which you are reporting: Jan 1, 2013 to Dec 31, 2013 

(Data reported in the report are equal to data based on year end run rate.)

Provide the amount of the product for the reporting year at each specific site: 

 

 Imported ___0____kgs/yr 

 

 Manufactured _0__kgs/yr
IV. PRODUCT CONTENT

A. CONCENTRATIONS OF RELEVANT PERFLUOROALKYL CHEMICALS 

Please provide the concentrations (ppb) of various perfluoroalkyl chemicals in your product. For 

chemicals for which you do not have actual data, please provide range estimates. 

 No manufacturing activity.

 

B. ANALYTICAL METHODS 

Analyses should be conducted using the most accurate instrumentation and procedures available 

as of the time of testing. Please provide detailed information on the methods used (including 

analytical standards used, sampling, sample treatment, analysis), assumptions made, uncertainties 

and detection limits (LOD, LOQ) for the data provided.
No. 99-20557 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-20557 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus MARGARITA PEREZ, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CR-386-1

-------------------- February 16, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * The Government appeals the sentence imposed on Margarita Perez after her guilty-plea conviction for aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. The Government argues that the district court clearly erred in determining that Perez was not reasonably capable of producing the negotiated eight kilograms of cocaine. Because the district court’s determination that Perez was not reasonably capable of producing the negotiated eight kilograms of cocaine was plausible in light of the record as a whole, the district court did not clearly errNo. 99-20557 -2- in determining that Perez should not be held responsible for eight kilograms of cocaine. See United States v. Vine , 62 F.3d 107, 109 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Graves , 5 F.3d 1546, 1555-56 (5th Cir. 1993). For the first time on appeal, the Government argues that the district court erroneously placed the burden of proof on the Government to show that Perez was not reasonably capable of producing eight kilograms of cocaine. Because the Government did not raise the issue of burden of proof in the district court, review is limited to plain error. United States v. Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc). Under Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b), this court may correct forfeited errors only when the appellant shows the following factors: (1) there is an error, (2) that is clear or obvious, and (3) that affects his substantial rights. Calverley , 37 F.3d at 162-64 (citing United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 730-36 (1993)). If these factors are established, the decision to correct the forfeited error is within the sound discretion of the court, and the court will not exercise that discretion unless the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. Olano , 507 U.S. at 736. The record indicates that the district court sought argument from both the Government and Perez’s counsel concerning whether Perez was capable of producing eight kilograms of cocaine and concerning which party suggested the eight kilogram amount. The Government has not shown that the district court shifted the burden of proof on the Government, and therefore, the Government has not shown plain error. SeeNo. 99-20557 -3- Calverley , 37 F.3d at 162-64.

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Artcraft
V Inc. for the quarter ending August 31, 2004, I, Scott Raleigh, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Artcraft V Inc. hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending August 31,
          2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the quarter ending August 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Artcraft V Inc.

Dated:  October 8, 2004

ARTCRAFT V INC.


By: /s/ Scott Raleigh
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer