alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 68 (Monday, April 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8470]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Economics and Statistics Administration

Bureau of Economic Analysis Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Bureau of Economic Analysis.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463 
as amended by Pub. L. 94-409, Pub. L. 96-523, Pub. L. 97-375 and Pub. 
L. 105-153), we are announcing a meeting of the Bureau of Economic 
Analysis Advisory Committee. The meeting will address ways in which the 
national economic accounts can be presented more effectively for 
current economic analysis and recent statistical developments in 
national accounting.

DATES: Friday, May 11, 2012 the meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and 
adjourn at 3:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the Bureau of Economic 
Analysis at 1441 L St. NW., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gianna Marrone, Program Analyst, 
Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, 
DC 20230; telephone number: (202) 606-9633.
    Public Participation: This meeting is open to the public. Because 
of security procedures, anyone planning to attend the meeting must 
contact Gianna Marrone of BEA at (202) 606-9633 in advance. The meeting 
is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for 
foreign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be 
directed to Gianna Marrone at (202) 606-9633.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Committee was established September 2, 
1999. The Committee advises the Director of BEA on matters related to 
the development and improvement of BEA's national, regional, industry, 
and international economic accounts, especially in areas of new and 
rapidly growing economic activities arising from innovative and 
advancing technologies, and provides recommendations from the 
perspectives of the economics profession, business, and government. 
This will be the Committee's twenty-third meeting.

    Dated: March 5, 2012.
Brian C. Moyer,
Deputy Director, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2012-8470 Filed 4-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-06-P
```
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Henning, Appellant.

(No. 31449

Decided June 16, 1948.)

*Mr. Richard W. Gordon,*city attorney, and *Mr. Glenn E. Kemp,*for appellee.

*Messrs. Draper, Lombardo & Morgan*and *Mr. Eldon E. Young,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as oí right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Zimmerman and Sohngen, JJ., concur.
Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) Monthly Inventory Report

As of February 26, 2024

(Million Units Except as Noted)

CCC Commodity 

Unit of 

Measure

Outstanding Under 

Loan

CY 2022

Outstanding 

Under Loan

CY 2023

CCC-Owned 

Inventory

(Actual Units)

Butter Pounds - - -

Cheese Pounds - - -

Nonfat Dry Milk Pounds - - -

Barley Bushels 0.0 3.1 0.0 

Corn Bushels 0.5 380.3 0.0 

Oats Bushels 0.0 0.5 0.0 

Sorghum Cwt. 0.0 0.6 0.0 

Soybeans Bushels 0.1

 

54.7 0.0 

Wheat Bushels 0.2 16.9 0.0 

Rice Cwt. 0.0 26.7 0.0 

Refined Sugar Pounds 50.0 1,360.5 0.0 

 In-process Beet Pounds 0.0 1,035.5 0.0 

Raw Cane Sugar Pounds 0.0 1,358.3 0.0 

 In-process Cane Pounds - - -

Honey Pounds 0.0 7.0 0.0 

Peanuts 

Tons (not 

millions)

 

 2,000 

 

1,712,850 0.0 

Canola Seed* Cwt. 0.0 484.0 0.0 

Crambe* Cwt. - - -

Flaxseed* Cwt. 0.0 12.0 0.0 

Mustard Seed* Cwt. 1.0 9.0 0.0 

Rapeseed* Cwt. - - -

Safflower Seed* Cwt. 0.0 19.0 0.0 

Sesame Seed* Cwt. - - -

Sunflower Seed (Oil)* Cwt. 0.0 767.0 0.0 

Sunflower Seed (Other)* Cwt. 0.0 10.0 0.0 

Dry Peas* Cwt. 1.0 201.0 0.0 

Lentils* Cwt. 0.0 15.0 0.0 

Chickpeas* Cwt. 0.0 16.0 0.0 

Upland Cotton

1,000 

Running 

Bales 0.0 3,111.6 0.0

ELS Cotton

1,000 

Running 

Bales 0.0 163.0 0.0
Notes: 

• *Minor Oilseeds & Pulses are in thousand units.

• The table below illustrates the month Marketing Assistance Loans (MALs) were 

forfeited to CCC (Forfeitures Received), liquidation of CCC-owned inventory 

(Sales), and CCC-owned inventory as of the date this report was completed 

(CCC-owned Inventory).

Date Forfeitures Received Sales CCC-owned Inventory

Mar-23

Apr-23

May-23

Jun-23

Jul-23

Aug-23 4 bales Upland cotton 4 bales Upland cotton 0

Sep-23 12 bales Upland cotton 12 bales Upland cotton 0

Oct-23

146 bales Upland cotton, 

20.63 tons Runner 

peanuts

146 bales Upland cotton, 

20.63 tons Runner 

peanuts

0

Nov-23

35 bales Upland cotton, 

56.49 tons Runner & 

Spanish peanuts

35 bales Upland cotton, 

56.49 tons Runner & 

Spanish peanuts

0

Dec-23 4 bales Upland cotton 4 bales Upland cotton 0

Jan-24 0

Feb-24 0
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6920

BENJAMIN F. COLEMAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

LEROY CARTLEDGE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. 

(5:11-cv-01595-TMC)

Submitted: October 11, 2012 Decided: October 15, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin F. Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, 

Deputy Assistant Attorney General, James Anthony Mabry, 

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin F. Coleman seeks to appeal the district 

court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) 

petition, and denying his subsequent motion for reconsideration. 

We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the 

notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of 

the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends 

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s initial order was entered on the 

docket on January 18, 2012, and the order denying Coleman’s 

motion for reconsideration was entered on February 10, 2012. 

The notice of appeal was filed on May 21, 2012. Because Coleman

failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an 

extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the 

appeal. We deny as moot Coleman’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability, and we also deny his motion to proceed in forma 

pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
720 S. Colorado Blvd

Penthouse North

Denver, CO 80246

Tel: +1 (334) 578 2900

Fax: +1 (334) 460 8111

www.unmannedexperts.com

E-Mail: operations@unmannedexperts.com

July 4, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, DC 20590

Application to Amend

Section 333 Exemption No. 11436

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0193

Petitioner:

Unmanned Experts, Inc.

Drew A. Jurkofsky, CKO

720 S. Colorado Blvd, PH North

Denver, CO 80246

Cell: 970-237-1902

Email: drew.j@unmannedexperts.com

Website: www.unmannedexperts.com

Dear Sir or Madam,

By letter from the FAA dated April 27, 2015, an exemption was granted to Unmanned Experts for relief under 

Section 333. That letter was marked Section 333 Exemption No. 11436 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0193.

Unmanned Experts hereby requests that the exemption so granted, be now amended to include the Turbo Ace 

Matrix and Xact Sense Max-8 multi-rotor aircraft.

Attached are the Aircraft Flight Manuals for the Turbo Ace Matrix and Xact Sense Max-8 aircraft. They contain 

the following:

• General Information

• Operating Limitations

• Normal Procedures

• Emergency Procedures

• Aircraft and Systems Description

• Handling, Service and Maintenance Procedures
Exemptions / Rule Making

The findings, rationale, conclusions and conditions contained in the FAA’s Exemption No. 11436 apply to this 

application to include the Turbo Ace Matrix and Xact Sense Max-8 models in Exemption No. 11436.

Thank you for your consideration of this important request. Please advise us of any additional information 

that is required.

Very Respectfully,

Drew A. Jurkofsky

Chief Knowledge Officer

Unmanned Experts, Inc.

Unmanned Experts PROPRIETARY Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Rand Logistics,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
W. McHugh, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as
      of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the
      Company for the periods presented.

Dated: November 20, 2006


/s/ Joseph W. McHugh, Jr.
-------------------------
Joseph W. McHugh, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
FalconTarget, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

FalconTarget, Inc.

Date: June 23, 2009

By:   /s/   Thomas Kirchner

Thomas Kirchner

Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
CASE NO. 12-14-00298-CR

ROBERT EUGENE PRITCHETT § COURT OF APPEALS VS. § STATE OF TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS § TWELFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPELLANT’S REPLY BRIEF TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT: Now comes Robert Eugene Pritchett, Appellant, in the above styled and numbered cause, by and through his attorney of record, Donovan Paul Dudinsky, and files this Motion For Leave to File Appellant’s Reply Brief pursuant to Rule 38.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Appellant respectfully requests accorded time for response period of time from the filing of the order by the esteemed Court. Appellant prays that relief requested be granted. /s/donovan paul dudinsky

_______________________________ DONOVAN PAUL DUDINSKY 701 South Liberty Street San Augustine, Texas 75972 Tel. 936-275-9871 Fax. 936-275-9655 TSBN: 24038869 Attorney for Appellant Robert Eugene Pritchett CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that on the 5 thday of February, 2015 a true and correct copy of the aforementioned Motion For Leave to File Appellant’s Reply Brief was delivered by facsimile service on the District Attorney, J. Kevin Dutton, San Augustine County, Texas. /s/ donovan paul dudinsky DONOVAN PAUL DUDINSKY ACCEPTED 12-14-00298-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 2/4/2015 1:55:52 PM CATHY LUSK CLERKC ASE NO. 12-14-00298-CR

ROBERT EUG ENE P RITCHETT § COURT OF AP P EALS VS. § STATE OF TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS § TWELF T H JUDICIAL DISTRICT

ORDER F OR LEAVE TO F ILE AP P ELLANT’S REP LY BRIEF CAME ON TO B E CONSI DERED Appellant’s Motion for L eave To F ile Appellant’s Reply B rief. The Twelfth Court of Appeal hereby Grants ______counsel’s Motion F o r L eave To F ile Appellant’s Reply B rief. THEREF ORE SO ORDERED. Appellant’s Reply B rief is due on the ____ day of ____________, 2015. Sig ned on this _____ day of F ebruary , 2015.

______________________________ PRESI DI NG J UDGE TW EL F TH COURT OF APPEAL S
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm’s Consent

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statement of FGI Industries Ltd. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-262353) of our report dated March 31, 2022, with respect toour audits of the consolidated financial statements of FGI Industries Ltd. as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December31, 2021 and 2020, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of FGI Industries Ltd. for the year ended December 31,2021.

 

/s/ Marcum llp

 

Marcum llp

Melville, NY

March 31, 2022
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment to Employment Agreement
(“Amendment”) is made this 24th day of May, 2022, between AB International Group Corp., a Nevada corporation (the
“Company”) and Chiyuan Deng (“Employee”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Employee
previously entered into an Employment Agreement on July 30, 2018 (the “Employment Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Employee
previously entered into an amendment to the Employment Agreement on September 11, 2020;


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Employee
now desire to amend the Employment Agreement to allow salary to be paid to Employee in shares of the Company’s common stock in lieu
of cash;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the premises and mutual covenants set forth herein, the parties hereto hereby agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:


 


Section 4 shall be replaced in its entirety with the
following:


 


“4.
COMPENSATION. Employer agrees to pay or cause to be paid the following to Executive for his services during the term of this Employment
Agreement:


 


a.
Salary. Employer shall pay the Employee $15,000_ per month ($180,000 per Year). The monthly amount will be paid to Employee once a month
on the 5th of each month. Company shall deduct or withhold any and all federal income and social security taxes and state and local taxes
required by law, if applicable. If the Company is short on cash, it may pay the salary to Employee in shares of the Company’s common
stock at the market price.


 


b.
Common Shares. Employee received 400,000 shares of common stock in Employer upfront for the six-year period of this Agreement. Employee
will return to Employer for cancellation 266,667 shares of common stock that he received from the upfront issuance. 


 


c.
Annual Bonus. On January 1st of each calendar year the Agreement is in effect, Employer, under direction of its Board, may pay or cause
to be paid a cash bonus or the equivalent in shares of common stock to Executive based upon the discretion of the Board.


 


d.
Preferred Shares. 100,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock in Employer.”


 


In all other respects, the remaining terms, covenants,
conditions and provisions of the Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect to the extent provided in the Employment
Agreement.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed
this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 





	AB International Group Corp.	 	Employee	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:: /s/ Chiyuan Deng	 	By: /s/ Chiyuan Deng	 
	Chiyuan Deng	 	Chiyuan Deng	 
	Chief Executive Office
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 591 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 591

 Supporting the goals and ideals of National Purple Heart Recognition 
                                  Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 24, 2018

  Ms. Collins (for herself, Mr. Manchin, Mr. Tester, Ms. Warren, Mr. 
  Markey, Ms. Baldwin, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Peters, Mr. 
Boozman, Ms. Smith, Mr. Merkley, Mrs. Ernst, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Thune, Mr. 
 Moran, Mr. Daines, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Young, Mr. Van Hollen, 
 Mr. Nelson, Mr. Donnelly, and Mrs. Feinstein) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Supporting the goals and ideals of National Purple Heart Recognition 
                                  Day.

Whereas, on August 7, 1782, during the Revolutionary War, General George 
        Washington established what is now known as the Purple Heart Medal when 
        he issued an order establishing the Badge of Military Merit;
Whereas the Badge of Military Merit was designed in the shape of a heart in 
        purple cloth or silk;
Whereas, while the award of the Badge of Military Merit ceased with the end of 
        the Revolutionary War, the Purple Heart Medal was authorized in 1932 as 
        the official successor decoration to the Badge of Military Merit;
Whereas the Purple Heart Medal is the oldest United States military decoration 
        in present use;
Whereas the Purple Heart Medal is awarded in the name of the President of the 
        United States to recognize members of the Armed Forces who are killed or 
        wounded in action against an enemy of the United States or are killed or 
        wounded while held as prisoners of war;
Whereas the Purple Heart Medal has been awarded to an estimated 1,800,000 
        recipients; and
Whereas August 7, 2018, is an appropriate day to celebrate as National Purple 
        Heart Recognition Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Purple Heart 
        Recognition Day; and
            (2) encourages all people of the United States--
                    (A) to learn about the history of the Purple Heart 
                Medal;
                    (B) to honor recipients of the Purple Heart Medal; 
                and
                    (C) to conduct appropriate ceremonies, activities, 
                and programs to demonstrate support for people who have 
                been awarded the Purple Heart Medal.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Orgral
Technologies Corp. f/k/a Artcraft IV Inc. for the quarter ending February 28,
2005, I, Helen Heit, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Orgral Technologies Corp. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-KSB for the quarter ending February
          28, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the quarter ending February 28, 2005, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Orgral Technologies Corp.

Dated:  April 19, 2005

ORGRAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP.


By: /s/ Helen Heit
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
#### TOWNLEY’S DAIRY COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Rae E. TIPPS, Michael S. Tipps, Kevin J. Tipps, Kelli D. Tipps, Terri Ann Ash, Gary W. Tipps, and Ricky L. Tipps, and Workers’ Compensation Court, Respondents.

No. 54826.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Nov. 25, 1980.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 19, 1981.

Gene C. Howard, R. K. Pezold, Howard & Rapp, Tulsa, for petitioner.

Patrick E. Moore, Moore/Foster, Attys., Oklahoma City, for respondents.

WILLIAMS, Justice:

The question presented is whether or not 85 O.S.Supp. 1979, § 44 (a) and (b) require death benefit claimants to make an election of remedies with the employer having the right of subrogation.

During the pendency of this action, the foregoing question was fully determined in *Earnest, Inc. and United General Insurance Company v. LeGrand and the Workers’ Compensation Court,*621 P.2d 1148 (Oki.1980), decided this date against the employer and insurance carrier. The holding in that case is adopted as the holding herein, and the order on appeal affirming the trial judge’s order is sustained.

*1155LAVENDER, C. J., IRWIN, V. C. J„ and HODGES, SIMMS, DOOLIN and HAR-GRAVE, JJ., concur.

OPAL A, J., concurs in result.

BARNES, J., dissents.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Solo Cup Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the thirteen weeks ended July 2, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric A. Simonsen, as Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                               
|-------------------------------
|/s/ Eric A. Simonsen           
|Eric A. Simonsen               
|Interim Chief Financial Officer
|November 15, 2006