alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
​

**Exhibit 35.1**

​

**Servicer Compliance Statement of John Deere Capital Corporation**

​

I, Katrin Watkins, Assistant Secretary of John Deere Capital Corporation, state:

​

A review of John Deere Capital Corporation’s activities for the period from October 31, 2022 through October 29, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”) and of John Deere Capital Corporation’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 20, 2022 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables LLC and John Deere Owner Trust 2022-B has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, John Deere Capital Corporation has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

​

​

| ​               | ​                        | ​              |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------|----------------------|
| Date: January 9, 2024 | John Deere Capital Corporation |
| ​               | ​                        | ​              |
| ​               | By:                            | */s/ Katrin Watkins* |
| ​               | ​                        | Katrin Watkins       |
| ​               | ​                        | Assistant Secretary  |
| ​               | ​                        | ​              |
| ​               | ​                        | ​              |
|                       | ​                        | ​              |

​

​

----
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 67 (Friday, April 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8302]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings <greek-i>2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2819-001
    Applicants: ALLETE, Inc.
    Description: Allete, Inc submits Midwest ISO MBR Process Document.
    Filed Date: 3/23/12
    Accession Number: 20120328-0010
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/13/12

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1131-000
    Applicants: Parkview AMC Energy, LLC
    Description: Additional Information to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 3/29/12
    Accession Number: 20120329-5107
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/19/12

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1379-000
    Applicants: Cleco Power LLC
    Description: Cleco Power 2012 Rate Case (Part 2 of 2) to be 
effective 6/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 3/29/12
    Accession Number: 20120329-5000
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/19/12

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1380-000
    Applicants: PacifiCorp
    Description: Termination of Alpental Non-Conforming PTP Agmt 
(Skyline) to be effective 5/29/2012.
    Filed Date: 3/29/12
    Accession Number: 20120329-5088
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/19/12

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1381-000
    Applicants: Robbins Energy, LLC
    Description: Cancellation of Tariff to be effective 3/29/2012.
    Filed Date: 3/29/12
    Accession Number: 20120329-5091
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/19/12

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1382-000
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc., New England Power Pool 
Participants Committee
    Description: Rev. to FCM Rules Related to Supplemental Availability 
Bilaterals to be effective 6/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 3/29/12
    Accession Number: 20120329-5102
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/19/12

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1383-000
    Applicants: Diamond State Generation Partners, LLC
    Description: Market-Based Rate Application to be effective 3/29/
2012.
    Filed Date: 3/29/12
    Accession Number: 20120329-5124
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/19/12

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5 
p.m. eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: March 29, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8302 Filed 4-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
FalconTarget, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the
fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

FalconTarget, Inc.

Date: June 5, 2007

By:   /s/   Thomas Kirchner

Thomas Kirchner

Chief Executive Officer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 27, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 27, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0475. MIRIAM FAJARDO-GUEVARA v. ACE HOMES LLC.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

17A01236
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certification**

I, James A. Peers, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GFI Group Inc.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)     disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)     any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 14, 2005 |   |                      |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                              |   | /s/ JAMES A. PEERS        |
|                         |   | James A. Peers            |
|                         |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

1

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

      ( print page 2549)    
In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned SEP:

*Time and Date:*                         8:30 a.m.-5 p.m., February 21-22, 2012 (Closed).                    

*Place:*                         Crowne Plaza Atlanta Perimeter Hotel at Ravinia, 4355 Ashford Dunwoody Rd, Atlanta, Georgia 30346 Telephone: (770) 395-7700.                    

Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.

*Matters To Be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to “Grants for Injury Control Research Centers, Panel 3, FOA CE12-001.”                    

Contact Person for More Information: Donald Blackman, Ph.D., M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway NE., Mailstop F63, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, Telephone (770) 488-0641.

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Dated: January 11, 2012.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2012-842 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
PCA: 12-3J14-24-B-0240-0001

PURCHASE

AWARD DESCRIPTION

DATE: March 14, 2024 BUY: Raisins

Sun Valley Raisins, Inc

2000009891 State Pricing ($) :

The Department of Agriculture (USDA) purchased raisins as indicated below for distribution to the 

child nutrition and other related domestic food assistance programs for fiscal year 2024. 

The purchase is the result of offers received in response to Solicitation No. 2000009891 dated 

February 9, 2024. All contracts are effective as of March 14, 2024. Deliveries will take place between 

July 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024. 

PURCHASE SUMMARY

 ALABAMA 37.06

36.86

35

34.56

36.20

38.16

38.16

38.16

37.82

37.82

37.85

ARKANSAS

ARIZONA

CALIFORNIA

COLORADO

CONNECTICUT

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

DELAWARE

FLORIDA

GEORGIA

IOWA

IDAHO 36.54

36.54

36.88

ILLINOIS

INDIANA

KANSAS 36.99

37.3 KENTUCKY

LOUISIANA 37.3
36.21

37.50

36.50

36

38.40

38.40

36.50

35

38.50

37.50

36.1

35.10

38.50

MASSACHUSETTS

MARYLAND

MAINE

MICHIGAN

MINNESOTA

MISSOURI

MISSISSIPPI

MONTANA

NORTH CAROLINA

NORTH DAKOTA

NEBRASKA

NEW HAMPSHIRE

NEW JERSEY

NEW MEXICO

NEVADA

NEW YORK

OHIO

OKLAHOMA

OREGON

PENNSYLVANIA

RHODE ISLAND 39

38.46

38.40

39

37.25

37.25

36.25

36.31

38.50

38

37

36.25

36.1

37.25

38.5

36

37.25

38

SOUTH CAROLINA

SOUTH DAKOTA

TENNESSEE

TEXAS

UTAH

VIRGINIA

VERMONT

WASHINGTON

WISCONSIN

WEST VIRGINIA

WYOMING 37.25
​

**Exhibit 35.2**

**Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.**

​

I, Steven N. Owenson, Senior Vice President and Finance Director of Deere Credit Services, Inc., state:

​

A review of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s activities for the period from October 30, 2023 through October 27, 2024 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 20, 2022 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables LLC and John Deere Owner Trust 2022-B has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

​

​

​

| ​                | ​                     | ​                                    |
|------------------------|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Date: January 10, 2025 | Deere Credit Services, Inc. |
| ​                | ​                     | ​                                    |
| ​                | By:                         | */s/ Steven N. Owenson*                    |
| ​                | ​                     | Steven N. Owenson                          |
| ​                | ​                     | Senior Vice President and Finance Director |
| ​                | ​                     | ​                                    |
| ​                | ​                     | ​                                    |

​

​

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Solo Cup Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 2, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert M. Korzenski, as Chief Operating Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert M. Korzenski
|Robert M. Korzenski    
|Chief Operating Officer
|May 16, 2006
#### DENNIS, INC., a Colorado Corporation, d/b/a My Sweet Lass, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OFFICE OF The DIRECTOR OF EXCISE AND LICENSES for The City and County of Denver, Colorado, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 79CA1140.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

Sept. 11, 1980.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 2, 1980.

*54Tinkler & Carwin, Stephen E. Tinkler, Denver, for plaintiff-appellant.

Max P. Zall, City Atty., Lee G. Rallis, Asst. City Atty., Denver, for defendant-ap-pellee.

KIRSHBAUM, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals the trial court judgment in a C.R.C.P. 106 proceeding affirming a decision of the Director of Excise and Licenses of the City and County of Denver temporarily suspending plaintiff’s fermented malt beverage license for serving beer to a minor in violation of § 12-46 — 112(l)(b), C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 5). We reverse.

The following facts pertinent to the Director’s decision are established by the record. On January 9, 1979, a Denver police officer entered plaintiff’s 3.2 beer establishment and observed a young woman seated at a table who, it was later established, was under 18 years of age. A partly-filled glass and a pitcher of beer rested in front of her.

At the suspension hearing held April 12, 1979, the officer testified to the foregoing observations. The record contains the following colloquy which occurred between the prosecuting attorney and the minor at the hearing:

“Q And were you served any beer this evening?

A I had a pitcher and I poured it and then I went to the bathroom but I didn’t drink any.

Q How many persons were there with you?

A Three.

Q Three?

A Two.

Q You had how many glasses or cups?

A Three.

Q Three cups?

A Uh-huh.

Q One for each of you?

A Yes.

Q You had one?

A Uh-huh.

Q Was it your intention to drink beer that evening?

A Uh-huh.”

No other evidence was presented relative to the presence of the beer on the table at which the minor was seated.

On this evidence, the hearing officer concluded that plaintiff had served beer to the minor, in violation of § 12-46 — 112(l)(b), C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 5), and the Director based his decision to suspend plaintiff’s license on that conclusion. However, the hearing officer did not conclude who, if anyone, served the beer to the minor, and the record contains no evidence to support any finding with respect to that critical fact. The minor’s testimony established only that she “had” a pitcher of beer. In the absence of any competent evidence to support a conclusion that some agent of plaintiff either served beer to the minor or permitted the beer to be served to her, the Director’s decision constitutes an abuse of discretion and must be reversed. *See Putnam*v. *Trustees of Police Pension Board,*170 Colo. 278, 460 P.2d 778 (1969).

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to enter judgment setting aside the suspension of plaintiff’s license.

COYTE and VAN CISE, JJ., concur.
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lloyd Dale SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 77-903.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

July 12, 1979.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 2, 1979.

Certiorari Granted Sept. 17, 1979.

*1339J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Hennessey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Edward G. Donovan, Sol. Gen., William Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

J. Gregory Walta, Colorado State Public Defender, J. Steven Patrick, Spec. Deputy State Public Defender, Denver, for defendant-appellant.

COYTE, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction of conspiracy to sell a narcotic drug. We reverse.

Defendant was charged with two counts of conspiracy and one count of sale of a narcotic drug. One of the conspiracy counts was dismissed prior to trial. The jury deadlocked on the sale charge, so the trial court declared a mistrial on this charge which the district attorney then dismissed.

Defendant asserts that the trial court should have granted his motion for judgment of acquittal on the conspiracy count because the prosecution’s evidence, even when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, failed to disprove the procuring agent defense. We agree.

Evidence presented through prosecution testimony or by the uncontradicted testimony of the defendant established that: (1) the initial contact with defendant regarding the purchase of drugs was through an informant paid by the state, and the subsequent transactions were initiated by an agent of the Drug Enforcement Administration; (2) defendant was not the source of the drugs; (3) defendant did not receive any profit or proceeds from the sale; and (4) defendant was only slightly acquainted with the persons who supplied the drugs prior to his contacts made on behalf of the government agent.

Defendant testified that he entered into the transaction only as a favor to the informant, whom defendant had known for several months and whom defendant considered a “good friend”. There was no evidence that defendant acted as an independent broker, seeking out buyers and sellers on his own initiative, or that he was involved in any transactions except those on behalf of the government agents.

The facts of this case are very similar to those in *People v. Fenninger,*191 Colo. 334, 552 P.2d 1018 (1976). There, the court held that evidence overwhelmingly showing that defendant acted solely at the request of and as the representative of the buyers entitled the defendant to a judgment of acquittal. *Fenninger*mandates reversal of the conviction here.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded with directions to enter a judgment of acquittal.

VAN CISE and STERNBERG, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Blackhawk Capital Group
      BDC, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Craig
      A.
      Zabala, as acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereto certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  May
      7,
      2008





/s/
                Craig A. Zabala


Craig
      A.
      Zabala


Acting
      Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Blackhawk Capital Group BDC Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.