8122 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2013 / Notices 

Energy LLC, Klamath Generation LLC, 

Klondike Wind Power LLC, Klondike 

Wind Power II LLC, Klondike Wind 

Power III LLC, Leaning Juniper Wind 

Power II LLC, Lempster Wind, LLC, 

Locust Ridge Wind Farm, LLC, Locust 

Ridge II, LLC, Manzana Wind LLC, 

MinnDakota Wind LLC, Moraine Wind 

LLC, Moraine Wind II LLC, Mountain 

View Power Partners III, LLC, New 

England Wind, LLC, New Harvest Wind 

Project LLC, Northern Iowa Windpower 

II LLC, Pebble Springs Wind LLC, 

Providence Heights Wind, LLC, Rugby 

Wind LLC, San Luis Solar LLC, Shiloh 

I Wind Project, LLC, South Chestnut 

LLC, Star Point Wind Project LLC, 

Streator-Cayuga Ridge Wind Power LLC, 

Trimont Wind I LLC, Twin Buttes Wind 

LLC. 

Description: Quarterly Land 

Acquisition Report of Iberdrola 

Renewables, LLC, et al. 

Filed Date: 1/29/13. 

Accession Number: 20130129–5089. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/13. 

Docket Numbers: LA12–4–000. 

Applicants: Southern Company 

Services, Inc., Alabama Power 

Company, Georgia Power Company, 

Gulf Power Company, Mississippi 

Power Company, Southern Power 

Company. 

Description: Quarterly Land 

Acquisition Report of Southern 

Company Services, Inc. 

Filed Date: 1/29/13. 

Accession Number: 20130129–5090. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/13. 

The filings are accessible in the 

Commission’s eLibrary system by 

clicking on the links or querying the 

docket number. 

Any person desiring to intervene or 

protest in any of the above proceedings 

must file in accordance with Rules 211 

and 214 of the Commission’s 

Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 

385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern 

time on the specified comment date. 

Protests may be considered, but 

intervention is necessary to become a 

party to the proceeding. 

eFiling is encouraged. More detailed 

information relating to filing 

requirements, interventions, protests, 

service, and qualifying facilities filings 

can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/ 

docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For 

other information, call (866) 208–3676 

(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. 

Dated: January 29, 2013. 

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2013–02496 Filed 2–4–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–R01–OAR–2013–0020; A–1–FRL– 

9776–2] 

Adequacy Status of Motor Vehicle 

Emission Budgets for Transportation 

Conformity Purposes; Connecticut 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of adequacy. 

SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is 

notifying the public that EPA has found 

that the 2017 and 2025 motor vehicle 

emissions budgets (MVEBs) in the June 

22, 2012 Connecticut State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision are 

adequate for transportation conformity 

purposes. The submittal includes 

MOVES2010 motor vehicle emissions 

budgets for 2017 and 2025 for the 

Connecticut portion of the New YorkNorthern New Jersey-Long Island, NYNJ-CT fine particle (PM2.5) 

nonattainment area. On March 2, 1999, 

the D.C. Circuit Court ruled that budgets 

in submitted SIPs cannot be used for 

conformity determinations until EPA 

has affirmatively found them adequate. 

As a result of our finding, the State of 

Connecticut can use the MOVES2010 

motor vehicle emissions budgets from 

the submitted plan for future conformity 

determinations for the Connecticut 

portion of the New York-Northern New 

Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT PM2.5

area. 

DATES: These motor vehicle emissions 

budgets are effective February 20, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Donald O. Cooke, Environmental 

Scientist, Air Quality Planning Unit, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

EPA New England Regional Office, Five 

Post Office Square, Suite 100 (CAQ), 

Boston, MA 02109–3912, (617) 918– 

1668, cooke.donald@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. 

Today’s notice is simply an 

announcement of a finding that we have 

already made. EPA New England sent a 

letter to Connecticut Department of 

Energy and Environmental Protection 

on January 8, 2013, stating that the 2017 

and 2025 MOVES2010 motor vehicle 

emissions budgets in the June 22, 2012 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) are 

adequate for transportation conformity 

purposes. This finding will also be 

announced on EPA’s conformity Web 

site: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/state

resources/transconf/adequacy.htm, 

(once there, click on ‘‘What SIP 

submissions has EPA already found 

adequate or inadequate?’’). The 

adequate motor vehicle emissions 

budgets (MVEBs) are provided in the 

following table: 

ADEQUATE MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS BUDGETS

Direct PM2.5

(tons per year) 

NOX

(tons per year) 

Year 2017 MVEBs for the Connecticut Portion of the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, 

NY-NJ-CT 1997 annual PM2.5 and 2006 24-hour PM2.5 Area ............................................................... 575 .8 12,791.8 

Year 2025 MVEBs for the Connecticut Portion of the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, 

NY-NJ-CT 1997 annual PM2.5 and 2006 24-hour PM2.5 Area ............................................................... 516 9,728.1 

Transportation conformity is required 

by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act. 

EPA’s conformity rule requires that 

transportation plans, programs, and 

projects conform to state air quality 

implementation plans and establishes 

the criteria and procedures for 

determining whether or not they do 

conform. Conformity to a SIP means that 

transportation activities will not 

produce new air quality violations, 

worsen existing violations, or delay 

timely attainment of the national 

ambient air quality standards. 

The criteria by which we determine 

whether a SIP’s motor vehicle emission 

budgets are adequate for conformity 

purposes are outlined in 40 CFR 

93.118(e)(4). Please note that an 

adequacy review is separate from EPA’s 

completeness review, and it also should 

not be used to prejudge EPA’s ultimate 

approval of the SIP. Even if we find a 

budget adequate, the SIP could later be 

disapproved. 

We have described our process for 

determining the adequacy of submitted 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2013 / Notices 8123 

SIP budgets in a May 14, 1999 

memorandum entitled ‘‘Conformity 

Guidance on Implementation of March 

2, 1999 Conformity Court Decision.’’ 

Additional guidance on EPA’s adequacy 

process was published in a July 1, 2004 

Federal Register final rulemaking, 

‘‘Transportation Conformity Rule 

Amendments for the New 8-hour Ozone 

and PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards and Miscellaneous Revisions 

for Existing Areas; Transportation 

Conformity Rule Amendments: 

Response to Court Decision and 

Additional Rule Changes’’ (69 FR 

40004). We followed this guidance in 

making our adequacy determination. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q. 

Dated: January 25, 2013. 

H. Curtis Spalding, 

Regional Administrator, EPA New England. 

[FR Doc. 2013–02492 Filed 2–4–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0049; FRL–9377–7] 

Rodenticides; Notice of Intent To 

Cancel Registrations of, and Notice of 

Denial of Applications for, Certain 

Rodenticide Bait Products 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 6(b) of the 

Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and 

Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), EPA hereby 

announces its intent to cancel the 

registration of 12 rodenticide products 

identified in this Notice. Pursuant to 

section 3(c)(6) of FIFRA, EPA hereby 

announces the denial of applications for 

registration of 2 products identified in 

this Notice. This Notice summarizes 

EPA’s basis for these actions, and 

explains how eligible persons may 

request a hearing and the consequences 

of requesting or failing to request such 

a hearing. 

DATES: Affected registrants must request 

a hearing within 30 days of receiving 

EPA’s Notice of Intent to Cancel, or on 

or before March 7, 2013, whichever 

occurs later. Other adversely affected 

parties must request a hearing on or 

before March 7, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: All persons who request a 

hearing must comply with the Agency’s 

Rules of Practice Governing Hearings, 

40 CFR part 164. Requests for hearing 

must be filed with the Hearing Clerk in 

EPA’s Office of Administrative Law 

Judges (OALJ), in conformance with the 

requirements of 40 CFR part 164. The 

OALJ uses different addresses 

depending on the delivery method. 

Please see Unit VI. for specific 

instructions. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Neil 

Anderson, Pesticide Re-evaluation 

Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; telephone number: 

(703) 308–8187; email address: 

anderson.neil@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Executive Summary 

A. What action is the agency taking? 

EPA is announcing its intent to cancel 

the registration of each of the pesticide 

products listed in Table 1: 

TABLE 1—PESTICIDE PRODUCTS SUBJECT TO CANCELLATION

Product EPA Reg. 

No. Registrant Active ingredient Deficiency 

D-Con Concentrate Kills Rats & Mice 3282–3 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Warfarin ........ Consumer product in a powder form and packaged without a protective bait station. 

D-Con Ready Mixed Kills Rats & 

Mice.

3282–4 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Warfarin ........ Consumer product in a pelleted form and packaged without a protective bait station. 

D-Con Mouse Prufe Kills Mice ......... 3282–9 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Warfarin ........ Consumer product in a pelleted form and packaged without a protective bait station. 

D-Con Pellets Kills Rats & Mice ....... 3282–15 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Warfarin ........ Consumer product in a pelleted form and packaged without a protective bait station. 

D-Con Mouse Prufe II ....................... 3282–65 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Brodifacoum .. Consumer product: (1) In a pelleted form and 

packaged without a protective bait station, 

and (2) contains a second generation anticoagulant rodenticide (SGAR). 

D-Con Pellets Generation II .............. 3282–66 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Brodifacoum .. Consumer product: (1) In a pelleted form and 

packaged without a protective bait station, 

and (2) containing a SGAR. 

D-Con Bait Pellets II ......................... 3282–74 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Brodifacoum .. Consumer product: (1) In a pelleted form and 

packaged without a protective bait station, 

and (2) containing a SGAR. 

D-Con Ready Mixed Generation II ... 3282–81 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Brodifacoum .. Consumer product: (1) In a pelleted form and 

packaged without a protective bait station, 

and (2) containing a SGAR. 

D-Con Mouse-Prufe III ...................... 3282–85 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Difethialone ... Consumer product: (1) In a pelleted form and 

packaged without a protective bait station, 

and (2) containing a SGAR. 

D-Con Bait Pellets III ........................ 3282–86 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Difethialone ... Consumer product: (1) In a pelleted form and 

packaged without a protective bait station, 

and (2) containing a SGAR. 

D-Con II Ready Mix Baitbits III ......... 3282–87 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Difethialone ... Consumer product: (1) In a pelleted form and 

packaged without a protective bait station, 

and (2) containing a SGAR. 

D-Con Bait Packs III ......................... 3282–88 Reckitt Benckiser, Inc ... Difethialone ... Consumer product: (1) In a pelleted form and 

packaged without a protective bait station, 

and (2) containing a SGAR. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES