T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T RO M ESH K U M A R, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N os . 07- 72628 07- 74951 A ge nc yN o. A 075- 545- 598 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i ons f

orR e vi e w of

O r de r s of

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay25, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R om e s h K um ar , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of I ndi a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) orders denyi ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) r e m ova l or de rand de ny i ng hi s m ot i on t o r e ope n. O ur j uri sdi ct i on i s gov erned b y 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew de no vo qu es t i on s of l aw 

# FI LED JU N 09 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 74951 2 an ddu e p r o c e s s c la im s , an df o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n . Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 400 F . 3d 785, 791- 92 ( 9th C i r . 2005) . W e de ny i n partand di s m i s s the pe t i t i on i n N o. 07- 72628, and de nythe pe t i t i on i n N o. 07- 7 4 9 5 1 . In N o . 0 7 -7 2 6 2 8 , K u m arh as w aiv ed an y c h allen g e to th e a g en cy ’s c o n c lu s io n th a t h e is r e m o v ab le f o ro v e r s tay in g h is v is ao rth a t h e f a ile dto d e m o n s tr a te e lig ib ilityf o rr e lie f f r o m r e m o v a l. Se e M

a r t i n ez - Se rra n o v . I

NS , 94 F .3 d1 2 5 6 , 1 2 5 9 - 6 0 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 6 ) . W e l ackj u ri sd i ct i o n o v er th e d en i al o f K u m ar’ s ex -w i fe’ s F o rm I-1 3 0 v i sa p e titio n . See 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2(a) (1) ( grant i ng j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew fi nal re m ov al orders ). K um ar ’ s r el at ed du e proces s c l ai m s f ai l because the IJdi d n otfi ndK um ar r e m o v ab le b a s e do n th e m arr ia g e f r au dc h ar g e . Se e La ta v . I NS , 204 F . 3d 1241, 1246 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( r e qui r i ng pr e j udi c e f orape t i t i one rt o pr e va i l on adue p r o c e s s c la im ) . In N o . 0 7 -7 4 9 5 1 , th e B IA d idn o t ab u se it s d iscr etio n ind en yin g K u m ar ’s m o tio n to r e o p e n o n th e g r o u n dth a t h e f a ile dto d e m o n s tr a te p r im af a c ie e lig ib ility f o ra d ju s tm e n t o f

s ta tu s . See Mendez- G ut i errez v . G on zales , 444 F . 3d 1168, 1171 ( 9th C i r . 2006) ( pe t i t i one rde m ons tr a t e s pr i m af a c i e e l i gi bi l i tyf

orr e l i e f w he r e the evi dence re veal s are as on abl e l i kel i ho odthatthe st atut ory r equi re m ent s f or re l i ef07- 74951 3 h av e b e e n s a tis f

ie d ) . K u m ar ’s c o n te n tio n th a t th e B I A c o n tr a d ic te dits h o ld in g in M at terof V elarde-P acheco , 2 3 I . & N . D e c . 2 5 3 ( B I A 2 0 0 2 ) is u n av a ilin g . I n N o . 0 7 - 7 2 6 2 8 : D E N I E D in p a r t ; D I S M I S S E D in p a r t . I n N o . 0 7 - 7 4 9 5 1 : D E N I E D .