alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
P. 1



# OAR Box 1830
Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 214 ) IV-C-18 1
Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:21:03 AM Sheet 214 of 232P. 2

UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION AGENC Y


## NOV

## 1 8 199 1 Honorabl e Patric k J . Leah y Chairman , Committe e on Agriculture , Nutrition , an

d Forestr y Unite d State s Senat e Washington , D.C . 20510-600 0
Dea r Mr . Chairman : 

### y fe A.. V


## DE C 

## \ 9\9? '

Thi s i s i n respons e t o you r lette r date d Septembe r 15 , 199 1 t o EPA regarding regulation s for onboar d refueling vapo r recovery

systems . You r lette r enclose d a cop y o f a lette r fro

m you r constituent , Mr . Stanle y Parris hexpressin g concer ntha t EP A doe s no t inten

d t o follo

w throughonthe rulemaking a s required . W e appreciat e thei r interes t i nhi s rulemaking . EP A i s proceedin g wit hth e rulemaking proces s for onboar d control s a s require d b y th e Clea n Ai r Ac t Amendment s o f 1990 . A s par t o f thi s process , Congres s directe d th e EPA t o consul t wit hthe Departmen t o f Transportatio n(DOT ) regarding onboar d syste m safety . Thi s consultatio n i s wel l underway . Th e Nationa l Highwa y

Traffi c Safet y

Administratio n(NHTSA) , whic hi s par t o f the DOT , release d a stud y o f onboar d syste m safet y

in Jul y 1991 . W e ar e reviewing thi s stud y an d hav e place d a cop y i n th e publi c docke t for thi s rulemaking . W e als o hel d a publi c hearin g on Septembe r 26t han d 27t hi norde r t o solici t comment s o n thi s issue . Writte n comment s wer e accepte d throug hOctobe r 27th . W e ar e i n th e proces s o f makin g th e fina l determinatio n on ho w t o procee d wit hthe rul e base d o nDOT' S conclusion s regarding safet y

risk s o f onboar d system s an d onth e record develope d durin g th e commen t period . Than k yo u fo r you r concer ni n thi s matter . You r letter s wil l be include d i n th e publi c docket . Pleas e fee l fre e t o contac t me i f yo u requir e an y additiona l information . Sincerel y

yours , 

### ORIGINA L SIGNE DB Y RICHAR DD.WILSO N Richar d D . Wilso n "Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s

cc : Publi c Docke t A-87-1 1 SDSB:Barba:Connell:256 5 Plymout hRd.:X515:ll/04/91:Leah y Las t Reviewe d b

y Charle s Gray:11/04/9 1 Contro l No . AL91434 5 Reviewe d b

y DZinger:BJR:X7645:AR-455:ll/06/91:Wan g No . 2605 T

CONCURRENCE S SYMBO L ^ OCLA^ SURNAM E \ y2J\c £ ••••••••**••*••• •>••'«.«•«•«•••«*««* •****•*••••••••••*< • •••••••**•«* •

EP A For m 1320-1 A (1/90 ) Printed on Recycled

Paper OFFICIA L FIL E COP

Y
•'^ \s", n 

## SERVE D JUL Y 29 , 201 1

U S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I N TH E MATTE RO F 

## SKYWES T AIRLINE S FA A DOCfCE

T No . (T O B E ASSIGNED I (Civi l Penall y Action ) FDMSNo . FAA-20ll-()48 5 

### I N TH E MATTERO F 

## SKYWES T AIRLINE S FA A DOCKE T No . [T O B E ASSIGNED I

(Civi l Penalty Action ) FDMSNo . FAA-20I1-048 6 

### ^ - 'MENTQ F ?0! i ^U G - 

## 2

^ 2 8

ORDE RGRANTIN G MOTIO N T O CONSOLIDAT E Complainan t

i n thes e matters , th e Federal Aviatio n Administratio n ("Complainant") , ha s filedaMotio n t o Consolidat e the m("Motion") . I n support . Complainan t

stale s tha t judicia l economy woul db e serve dbecaus e th e partie s andvenue ' ar e th e sam e andtha

t significan t

overlap of

witnesse s i s expected . Complainan t als o represent s tha

t Responden t

ha s n o objectio n t o consolidation . Th e Motio n i s hereb y GRANTED" .

### Ilciirin g date s will b e se t b y subsequen t

order . Th e parlie s will decide.whic h inatle r wil l h e heardfirst , andwil l advis e th e undersigne dof thei r decisio n prio r

to th e start of th e hearing . S O ORDERED . ' 

# 1 ^ 

# ex

- f^^- o 

### AUachment s - Servic e Lis t RichardC . Goodwi n U.S . Administrativ e La

w Judg eFDM S Nos . FAA-2011-048 5 & FDMSNo . FAA-2011 ~ 048 6 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 WilburWrigh t

Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Tod dC . Emerson , Respondent'sReprcscniaiiv e Directo r - Governmen t

an dLega l Affair s SkyWes t Airline s 44 4 Sout hRive r

Roa d St . George , U T 8479 0 TEL : 435-634-353 0 FAX : 435-634-350 5 Jeffre y M . Harper , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Northwes t

Mountai n Region , AJMM-7 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 160 1 Lin dAvenue , S.W . Renton , W A 9805 7 TEL : 425-227-216 1 FAX : 425-227-100 7 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Admifiisiranv e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service was b

y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expeditedcourier , use the followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , 600 Independence Avenue . S.W. . Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Wasliington , \) C 2059] ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .

- 2 -
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10904 Conference Calendar

__________________
STANLEY J. STEVENS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CHARLES MARTIN; ANDREA JOHNSON, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:95-CV-557

- - - - - - - - - - December 19, 1995 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Stevens appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Stevens argues on appeal that he did not have a fair revocation hearing due to the acts of the defendants who conspired in a mutual scheme to deny him his constitutional rights when the witnesses he subpoenaed to testify at the revocation hearing proved him to be innocent. He contends that the defendants abused their authority by taking it uponNo. 95-10904 -2- themselves to revoke his parole knowing that he was innocent from the witness's own confession. Stevens alleges that Douglas Burns confessed to forging the prescription at the revocation hearing. He does not address the bases of the district court's dismissal. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Further, we find that Stevens' appeal is frivolous, and accordingly, we DISMISS it pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Stevens was warned in Stevens v. Hay's Pharmacy , No. 95-10119 (5th Cir. Apr. 14, 1995) that filing future frivolous appeals would result in disciplinary sanctions. Stevens is hereby sanctioned in the amount of $100, and he is barred from filing any further civil, pro se , in forma pauperis appeals in this court, without the advance written permission of a judge of this court, until the sanction is paid.
APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.
391 A.2d 679

#### Commonwealth v. Demby, Appellant.

Submitted March 20, 1978.

John W. Packel, Assistant Defender, and Benjamin Lemer, Defender, for appellant; Robert B. Lawler, Assistant District Attorney, and Edward G. Rendell, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

SPAETH, J., concurred in the result.

HOFFMAN, J., dissented based on his dissenting opinion in *Commonwealth v. Poindexter,*248 Pa.Superior Ct. 564, 375 A.2d 384 (1977).
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION**





**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the annual report on Form
      10-KSB of Simtrol, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2007,
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof
      (the "Report"), the undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that (1) the Report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





This
      Certification shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934.





This
      Certification is signed on April 29, 2008.





/s/
                Richard W. EganRichard
                W. EganPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer/s/
                Stephen N. SampStephen
                N. SampChief
                Financial Officer
IIB

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 56

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 22, 2001

Reveived

JUNE 7, 2001

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding National

Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day.

Whereas on December 7, 1941, the Imperial Japanese Navy

and Air Force attacked units of the Armed Forces of the

United States stationed at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii;

Whereas 2,403 members of the Armed Forces of the United

States were killed in the attack on Pearl Harbor;

Whereas there are more than 12,000 members of the Pearl

Harbor Survivors Association;
2

HCON 56 RFS

Whereas the 60th anniversary of the attack on Pearl Harbor

will be December 7, 2001;

Whereas on August 23, 1994, Public Law 103–308 was enacted, designating December 7 of each year as National

Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day; and

Whereas Public Law 103–308, reenacted as section 129 of

title 36, United States Code, requests the President to

issue each year a proclamation calling on the people of

the United States to observe National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day with appropriate ceremonies and activities, and all departments, agencies, and instrumentalities

of the Federal Government, and interested organizations,

groups, and individuals, to fly the flag of the United

States at half-staff each December 7 in honor of the individuals who died as a result of their service at Pearl Harbor: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress, on the occasion of the

3 60th anniversary of the December 7, 1941, attack on

4 Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, pays tribute to—

5 (1) the United States citizens who died in the

6 attack; and
3

HCON 56 RFS

1 (2) the members of the Pearl Harbor Survivors

2 Association.

Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________
N O . 09

- 2 2

- 00193

- CV

__________________

IN THE INTEREST OF W.A.J., C.G.J., M.R.J., A.G.J., AND J.J.

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 1A District Court Tyler County, Texas Trial Cause No. 25,278

__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION

G.J.
, Appellant, filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Appellant filed the motion before the appellate court issued a

decisi on in the appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App.

P. 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISM I SSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on July 27, 2022 Opinion Delivered July 28, 2022

Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Memorandum 

Subject: 

From: 

To: 

August 4 2014 

July 30,2014 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Visit to Oil 

Production Site Operated by EOG Resources, Inc. 

Outreach 

Chris Stoneman, 

and Information 

Policy AdvisorCL_ 

Division, 

~ 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) 

Docket- EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0151 

This memorandum to docket documents a visit EPA made to an oil production site 

operated by EOG Resources, Inc. in rural Colorado northeast of Denver. EOG Resources, 

Inc. provided the site visit at the request of EPA. The purpose ofthe visit was to provide 

EPA staff first-hand exposure to a production site in order to gain a greater understanding 

of the operations, its emissions and its controls. The EPA staff that participated in the site 

visit are responsible for managing and preparing the proposal action that will follow the 

Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR): "Managing Emissions from Oil and 

Natural Gas Production in Indian Country." (79 Federal Register 32502, June 5, 2104) 

Site visit details: 

When: Afternoon of July 30, 2014 

Where: Garden Creek 2 Oil Production Facility, Briggsdale, CO 

Participants: Chris Stoneman, EPA, OAQPS 

Mary Tom Kissell, EPA, OAQPS 

Cindy Beeler, EPA, Region 8 

Deirdre Rothery, EPA, Region 8 

Claudia Smith, EPA, Region 8 

Curtis Rice, EOG Resources, Inc. 

Nick Lane, EOG Resources, Inc. 

This memorandum will be filed in the docket for the proposed rule and will be available 

for public review.
NUMBER 13-18-00195-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

RENAISSANCE EMERGENCY

PHYSICIANS, P.A., Appellant,

v.

ANDY RODRIGUEZ, INDIVIDUALLY

AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR K.R.

AND G.R. AND AS PERSONAL 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF STEPHANIE REYES,

DECEASED, RENE REYES AND

LETICIA REYES, Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 139th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Contreras, Longoria, and Hinojosa

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa
Appellant Renaissance Emergency Physicians, P.A., perfected an appeal from an 

interlocutory order denying its motion to dismiss the health care liability claim of appellee 

Andy Rodriguez, individually and as next friend for K.R. and G.R. and as personal 

representative of the estate of Stephanie Reyes, deceased, Rene Reyes and Leticia 

Reyes. Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal and requests 

that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed 

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is 

hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) 

("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). 

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be 

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

LETICIA HINOJOSA

Justice

Delivered and filed the

19th day of July, 2018.
EX-10.1


  Exhibit 10.1

  AMENDMENT TO THE 

  RED VIOLET, INC.

  2018 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 

  WHEREAS, Red Violet, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) currently maintains and sponsors the Red Violet, Inc. 2018 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”); and 

  WHEREAS, Section 14(l) of the Plan provides that the Board of the Directors of the Company (“Board”) may amend the Plan from time to time; and 

  WHEREAS, the Board has determined it to be in its best interests to amend the Plan as set forth herein; and 

  NOW, THEREFORE, effective upon the Company’s Stockholders’ approval as set forth in Section 14(l) of the Plan, the following amendment to the Plan is hereby adopted: 

  Section 5(a) of the Plan shall be amended and restated to read as follows: 

  “(a) Shares Available for Awards. The Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan shall be treasury shares or authorized but unissued shares of the Common Stock. The total number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan shall be 6,500,000 shares. A maximum of 6,500,000 shares of Red Violet stock may be subject to grants of Incentive Stock Options.” 

  Except as modified by this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain valid and in full force and effect. 

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Company, has executed this instrument as of the 25th day of May 2022, on behalf of the Company. 

   

  			
	RED VIOLET, INC.

	 
	 
	 

	By
	 
	/s/ Daniel MacLachlan

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	Name
	 
	Daniel MacLachlan

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	Title
	 
	Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Blackhawk Capital Group BDC, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Craig A. Zabala, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 By: /s/ Craig A. ZabalaCraig A. Zabala, Chief Executive OfficerNovember 19, 2004
Exhibit 35.1





Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.








This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 13, 2022 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2022-3 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.  I further certify as follows:





1. I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023, and its performance under the Agreement.





2. To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.








AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.





By:/s/ Connie CoffeyDated:March 4, 2024Connie CoffeyExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 32


                 STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
                             GOLD KIST INC.
                   PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gold Kist Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 2, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John Bekkers, President and Chief Executive Officer, and
principal executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.


/s/ John Bekkers
John Bekkers
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 17, 2005



                               EXHIBIT 32


                 STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                             GOLD KIST INC.
                   PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gold Kist Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 2, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Stephen O. West, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President,
and principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.


/s/ Stephen O. West
Stephen O. West
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President
May 17, 2005
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 56

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding National Pearl Harbor

Remembrance Day.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 7, 2001

Mr. WELLER submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding National

Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day.

Whereas on December 7, 1941, the Imperial Japanese Navy

and Air Force attacked units of the Armed Forces of the

United States stationed at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii;

Whereas 2,403 members of the Armed Forces of the United

States were killed in the attack on Pearl Harbor;

Whereas there are more than 12,000 members of the Pearl

Harbor Survivors Association;

Whereas the 60th anniversary of the attack on Pearl Harbor

will be December 7, 2001;

Whereas on August 23, 1994, Public Law 103–308 was enacted, designating December 7 of each year as National

Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day; and
2

•HCON 56 IH

Whereas Public Law 103–308, reenacted as section 129 of

title 36, United States Code, requests the President to

issue each year a proclamation calling on the people of

the United States to observe National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day with appropriate ceremonies and activities, and all departments, agencies, and instrumentalities

of the Federal Government, and interested organizations,

groups, and individuals, to fly the flag of the United

States at half-staff each December 7 in honor of the individuals who died as a result of their service at Pearl Harbor: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress, on the occasion of the

3 60th anniversary of the December 7, 1941, attack on

4 Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, pays tribute to—

5 (1) the United States citizens who died in the

6 attack; and

7 (2) the members of the Pearl Harbor Survivors

8 Association.

Æ