alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,500-01

EX PARTE SAMUEL CHARLES VANNESS IV, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 22,367-A IN THE 258 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM POLK COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the offense of

driving while intoxicated and sentenced to imprisonment for nine years. 

On May 26, 2015, an order designating issues was signed by the trial court. The habeas

record has been forwarded to this Court prematurely. We remand this application to the 258th

District Court of Polk County to allow the trial judge to complete an evidentiary investigation and

enter findings of fact and conclusions of law.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: August 26, 2015

Do not publish
Order entered January 20, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01207-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.G., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 14-1176-W

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s second request for an extension of time in which to file her 

brief. The motion is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief is due on or before January 30, 2017. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00379-CR

Pablo Garcia

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 4

of Tarrant County (1219702D)

November 7, 2013

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _________________________________

 Justice Lee Gabriel
NUMBER 13-12-00755-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

EX PARTE JUAN MALDONADO

 

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

On September 11, 2013, the Court abated this appeal and remanded the matter to 

the trial court for consideration of a motion to dismiss. The State of Texas, by and 

through its Assistant District Attorney, the Honorable James Odell, has filed a motion to 

reinstate and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Accordingly, the 

State’s motion to reinstate is GRANTED. 

No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we GRANT the State’s 

motion and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at the State’s request, no 
2

motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

10th day of October, 2013.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-83,500-01

EX P ARTE SAMUEL CHARLES VANNESS IV, Appl icant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 22,367-A IN THE 258 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM P OLK COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1 9 6 7 ). Applicant was convicted of the offense of driving while intox icated a nd sentenc ed to imprisonment for nine y ear s. On May 26, 2015, an ord er d es i gn at i n g issues was signe d by the trial court. The habea s
rec ord has b ee n fo rwarded to this Court prema turely
. We rema nd this application to the 258 t h District Court of Polk County to a llow the trial judg e to complete a n evidentiar

y investiga tion a

nd enter finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law. This application will be held in abey ance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. Theissues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this o rd er . A s upplemental transcr ipt containing all

aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court withi n 120 day s of t he date of t his order
. Any extensions of ti me shall be obtained f

rom this Court. Filed: Aug ust 26, 2015 Do not publish
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2022-1 Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and


5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  Citibank, N.A..

Date:  June 17, 2022



|                                                     | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
|Paul C. Honda                                        | 
|Vice President and Assistant Secretary               | 
|American Honda Finance Corporation                   | 
|(senior officer in charge of the servicing function) | 



---
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 617 

Recognizing The American Legion for 100 years of service to veterans and 

members of the Armed Forces in the United States and their families. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 23, 2018 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Ms. SMITH) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AUGUST 28, 2018 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing The American Legion for 100 years of service 

to veterans and members of the Armed Forces in the 

United States and their families. 

Whereas The American Legion was chartered and incorporated by Congress in 1919; 

Whereas The American Legion is the largest wartime veterans service organization in the United States; 

Whereas The American Legion has advocated for legislation 

on behalf of veterans throughout its history; 

Whereas the members of The American Legion were crucial 

in passing the Act of August 9, 1921 (42 Stat. 147, 

chapter 57) (commonly known as the ‘‘Sweet Bill’’), 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 617 ATS 

which combined the responsibilities for veterans’ affairs 

under a single agency, the Veterans Bureau; 

Whereas the legislative achievements of The American Legion 

are important to veterans and include the Servicemen’s 

Readjustment Act of 1944 (58 Stat. 284, chapter 268) 

(commonly known as the ‘‘G.I. Bill’’), which provided 

benefits to veterans of World War II, including funds for 

higher education, low-cost mortgages, low-interest loans 

for businesses, and unemployment compensation; 

Whereas The American Legion has advocated for veterans 

who were exposed to hazardous materials during their 

service in the Armed Forces, such as Agent Orange and 

toxins from burn pits; 

Whereas The American Legion continues to provide valuable 

services to veterans, including advocacy for high-quality 

health care, vocational training, and employment programs; 

Whereas The American Legion provides scholarships for postsecondary education and grants for nursing training programs; 

Whereas American Legion Baseball is a very successful amateur athletic league that values sportsmanship, citizenship, and fitness; 

Whereas the inaugural convention of The American Legion 

was held in 1919 in Minnesota; and 

Whereas the 100th National Convention of The American Legion will be held August 24 through August 30, 2018, in 

Minnesota: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 617 ATS 

1 (1) recognizes and commends The American 

2 Legion for a century of service to veterans and 

3 members of the Armed Forces in the United States 

4 and their families; and 

5 (2) designates the week of August 24 through 

6 August 30, 2018, as ‘‘American Legion Week’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 2 1

- 14 71 V

UNPUBLISHED

GENEVIEVE HERING,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: February 14 , 2022

Withdrawal of petition ; Order
concluding proceedings

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1

On June 1 5 , 2021

, Genevieve Hering filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

— 1 0 through 34

. 2

Petitioner alleged that s he suffered injuries after receiving a human papillomavirus

vaccination on January 30 , 2019

. ECF no. 1.

Because a decision had not been issued within the time specified in Vaccine Rule 10(b), a notice issued advising that “ that the petitioner may withdraw the petition

under section 300aa

— 21(b) of this title or the pet itioner may choose under section

300aa

— 21(b) of this title to have the petition remain before the special master. ” 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

— 12 (g ). O n February 10 , 2022

, Petitioner timely filed a notice to

withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U

. S

. C

. § 300aa

— 21(b).

In light of Petitioner ’ s election to withdraw the petition pursuant to 42 U

. S

. C

. §

300aa

— 21(b) (promulgated as Vaccine Rule 10(d)), Petitioner ’ s request to withdraw the petition is GRANTED . Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment “on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk’s Office.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

1 Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United

States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this

case

, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available
to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inform ation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition,
I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755.2 s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
Attachment 2 

 AMA FEE SCHEDULE 

Services under AMA as of 1946 

Effective Date: March 1, 2024

Service 

Commodity Inspection & Bulkweighing 

 Rate

Regular Hourly Rate Monday – Friday $36.20/ Hour 

Saturday, Sunday, and Holidays * 

 *Holidays means New Years Day Memorial Day Fourth of July 

 Labor Day Thanksgiving Day Christmas Day 

$54.30/ Hour 

Mycotoxin Testing 

$33.00/Test

Phytosanitary Inspection * $9.00/Carrier + applicable hourly rate

Graded Commodities (Beans, Peas, Lentils, Hops, and Pulses) 

Grade (Per lot or sample) $20.00/Test 

Factor Analysis (Per Factor) $6.25/Factor

Non-graded, Commodities 

Factor Analysis (Per Factor)

$ 6.25/Factors

Stowage Examination when requested no other service in addition to 

hourly rate. $15.50

Travel

Airfare, mileage, per diem, etc. Actual Cost

Mileage IRS allowable rate

Travel will be charged at the applicable hourly rate.

Postage and/or Freight Actual Cost 
Credit Card Fee: Direct pass through of credit card charge from credit card processor, if credit card is 

used.

The following fees will be charged for services rendered by this agency under the Agricultural Marketing 

Act of 1946.

Commodity Cooperative Service Agreement Fees. In addition to all other applicable fees, commodity 

cooperative service agreement fees for commodity inspection services (pulses, hops, and miscellaneous 

processed commodities), excluding rice, will be assessed at the current percentage rate identified in FGIS 

Directive 9180.74 (Service Fees and Billing Codes, Attachment 4.) The assessed fees must exclude travel, 

mailing expenses, and state and local taxes. Invoices will identify assessed commodity cooperative service 

agreement fees as separate line items

When no fee for service has been established, the hourly rate 

will apply. Date Revised 01/01/2024
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00049-CR

Adrien "Bull" Shermane Thomas

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of DeWitt County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 05-04-10,127A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 18, 2014
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA- 2013 - 0370 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM034AD

670BA - 35 - 012, RA --- 11/26/12 670BA - 35 - 012 --- 8/3/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
**SampleDate Contract#**  **AR #SO2/MMBTU AR Moist** **Dry Ash**  3-Jan-10 HC10331H 

### 5.08 13.73 9.2 5-Jan-10 HC02135 

### 7.07 6.71 10.53 5-Jan-10 HC02214 

### 4.92 10.82 8.44 5-Jan-10 MC10350 

### 3.83 12.43 8.97 6-Jan-10 HC10331A 

### 3.92 9.23 7.89 8-Jan-10 HS03217 

### 3.88 7.07 8.33 12-Jan-10 HC10331S 

### 5.06 13.13 9.9 22-Jan-10 HC02135 

### 6.54 8.22 9.43 24-Jan-10 HC10331H 

### 4.93 13.79 9.4 25-Jan-10 HS02720 

### 3.63 6.73 8.14 26-Jan-10 MC10350 

### 4.11 11.96 8.81 28-Jan-10 HC10331A 

### 3.80 11.38 8.07 28-Jan-10 MS03421 

### 3.56 12.27 8.29 6-Feb-10 HS03322 

### 3.44 9.5 8.46 9-Feb-10 HC02135 

### 7.07 7.39 9.78 10-Feb-10 MC10350 

### 3.97 13.19 9.09 11-Feb-10 HC10331S 

### 5.16 15.04 10 11-Feb-10 HS03430 

### 5.57 8.11 9.99 12-Feb-10 HC02214 

### 4.97 10.4 8.49 12-Feb-10 HC10331H 

### 4.78 15.68 8.92**AR BTU HgDry** **Basis (ppb)** **ClDry Basis** 

**(% )**  11258 101.44 0.1259 12389 0.0635 12061 117.130.1034 11695 72.25 0.3018 12293 76.38 0.1657 12724 261.82 0.1787 11388 105.730.0014 12414 97.86 0.0641 11318 101.580.1302 13156 113.630.0990 11734 67.38 0.2814 12102 101.30 0.1835 12032 97.97 0.3301 12684 130.250.1062 12412 124.84 0.0684 11576 87.52 0.3247 11158 122.650.0130 12486 152.81 0.0665 12112 119.40 0.1010 11095 104.280.1342
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE 

SPECIALTY CROPS INSPECTION DIVISION 

SUPER-LOT NON-CONFORMITY REPORT 

Report #: 

__________ in 20____ 

COMPANY NAME: DATE: 

WAREHOUSE REPRESENTATIVE: 

SUPERVISOR: RATING: 

☐ MAJOR or ☐ CRITICAL 

DESCRIPTION OF NON-CONFORMITY: 

NOTIFIED COMPANY STAFF AT TIME OF FINDING NON-CONFORMITY: ☐ YES or ☐ NO 

____ Non-Conformity is reoccurring 

____ Non-Conformity is the result of an ineffective corrective action 

____ Non-Conformity will result in immediate removal from the program 

COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE (Signature affirms facts concerning non-conformity are correct): DATE: 

CORRECTIVE ACTION PROPOSED AND TIME-FRAME FOR IMPLEMENTATION: 

SUPERVISOR SIGNATURE (For acceptance of proposed corrective action and timetable for implementation): DATE: 

Appendix IV to Tomato Super-Lot Pilot Program (09/2023) USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO

18
U.S.C. 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with Annual Report of ADAMAS ONE CORP. (the “Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2022 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Steven Staehr, Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Date:
    January 13, 2023 | By:    | /s/
    Steven Staehr                                    
|-------------------------- | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                           | Name:  | Steven
    Staehr                                        
|                           | Title: | Chief
    Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 10.42


 


AGREEMENT


 


This
AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of May 18, 2022, by and among BioLife4D Corporation, a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), and BioLife4D - SM Trust (the “Trust”).


 


WHEREAS,
the Company has become indebted to Fifth Third Bank National Association (the “Bank”) pursuant to a loan made
by the Bank to the Company in the original principal amount of $1,000,000 (the “Loan”);


 


WHEREAS,
as a condition to the Bank’s agreement to make the Loan to the Company, the Trust has provided cash collateral to secure the
Loan in the amount of $1,000,000 (the “Collateral”); and


 


WHEREAS,
in consideration of the Trust providing the Collateral to the Bank in connection with the Loan, the Company has agreed to reimburse
the Trust for all interest, costs, expenses and other amounts incurred by the Trust in connection with the Loan and the provision of
the Collateral.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth in this Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Trust hereby agree as follows:


 


1.
Reimbursement. In the event that the Trust incurs any interest, costs, expenses and other amounts in connection with the
Loan (the “Trust Costs”), the Company shall, within five days following written request from the Trust, reimburse
the Trust for any and all Trust Costs. The Trust shall provide the Company with reasonable documentation evidencing all such Trust Costs.


 


2.
Authority. The Company has the full authority to execute, deliver, and perform under this Agreement and this Agreement
constitutes the legal, valid, and binding obligation of the Company.


 


3.
Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the internal law of the State of Delaware, without regard to conflict
of law principles that would result in the application of any law other than the law of the State of Delaware.


 


4.
Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Counterparts may be delivered via facsimile, electronic mail (including pdf or
any electronic signature complying with the U.S. federal ESIGN Act of 2000, e.g., www.docusign.com) or other transmission method and
any counterpart so delivered shall be deemed to have been duly and validly delivered and be valid and effective for all purposes.


 


[Signature
page follows.]


 




    	 



     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


	BIOLIFE4D - SM TRUST	 	BIOLIFE4D CORPORATION
	 	 	 	 	    
	By: 	/s/ Steven R. Morris	 	By:	/s/ Steven R. Morris
	 	Name:
    Steven R. Morris	 	 	Name:
    Steven R. Morris
	 	Title:
    Trustee	 	 	Title:
    CEO


 


[Signature
Page to Agreement]
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1. |   | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending August 31,                2007,                fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. |   | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                quarter ending August 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material                respects,                the financial condition and results of operations of Orgral Technologies                Corp. |
|----|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

* /s/      Helen      Heit                                                             *