### 34576 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Parts 1 and 93**

**[Docket No. FAA–2004–17005; Amdt. No. 1–63 and 93–90]** 

**RIN 2120–AI17**

**Washington, DC Metropolitan Area Special Flight Rules Area; OMB**  **Approval of Information Collection**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

**ACTION :**  Change of OMB approval number for information collection.

**SUMMARY :**  This document notifies the public of a change in the Office of Management and Budget’s approval control number for certain information collection. The rule titled ‘‘Washington, DC Metropolitan Area Special Flight Rules Area’’ was published on December 16, 2008. At that time, the final rule identified OMB Control Number 2120–0706 as the approval document for the flight plans and other information collected under that rule. That information collection, however, is accounted for under OMB Control Number 2120–0026.

**DATES :**  The rule, including the information collection requirements in §§ 93.335, 93.339, 93.341, and 93.343, became effective on February 14, 2009. This document announces that the OMB approval for Domestic and International Flight Plans, #2120–0026, accounts for the paperwork burden in that rule.

**CONTACT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION :**  For questions about this document, contact Ellen Crum, Airspace and Rules Group, Office of System Operations Airspace and AIM, 800 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202)
267–8783.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  On December 16, 2008, the final rule ‘‘Washington, DC Metropolitan Area Special Flights Rules Area’’ was published in the Federal Register (75 FR 76195). In that rule, the FAA codified special flight rules and airspace and flight restrictions for certain aircraft operations in the Washington, DC Metropolitan Area.

In the Paperwork Reduction Act section of the final rule, the FAA noted that the flight plans and other information collection that the rule required had been approved by OMB. It said that ‘‘OMB approved the collection of this information and assigned OMB Control Number 2120–0706.’’

OMB information collection control #2120–0026 covers Domestic and International Flight Plans collection. Thus, the flight plans required for the Washington, DC Metropolitan Area Special Flight Rules Area are covered by information collection control #2120– 0026. As a result, the FAA is withdrawing and discontinuing OMB control #2120–0706.

This document is being published to inform affected parties of this change.

Issued in Washington, DC, on June 7, 2011. Dennis R. Pratte, Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2011–14552 Filed 6–13–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 71**

**[Docket No. FAA–2010–1232; Airspace Docket No. 10–AEA–28]** 

**Amendment of Class E Airspace; Waynesboro, VA** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This action amends the Class E Airspace at Waynesboro, VA, to accommodate the additional airspace need for the Standard Instrument Approach Procedures developed for Eagle’s Nest Airport. This action enhances the safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the airport. Also, the geographic coordinates for the airport will be corrected.

**DATES :**  Effective 0901 UTC, August 25, 2011. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  John Fornito, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404)
305–6364.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  History

On March 18, 2011, the FAA published in the Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend Class E airspace at Eagle’s Nest Airport, Waynesboro, VA (75 FR 14820) Docket No. FAA–2010–1232. Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No comments were received.

Subsequent to publication, the FAA found the geographic coordinates for the airport were not rounded down. This action will make that correction. Except for editorial changes, and the changes noted above, this rule is the same as published in the NPRM.

Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9U dated August 18, 2010, and effective September 15, 2010, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR Part 71.1. The Class E airspace designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 amends Class E5 airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface to accommodate new standard instrument approach procedures developed at Eagle’s Nest Airport, Waynesboro, VA. This action is necessary for the safety and management of IFR operations at the airport. Additionally, the geographic coordinates for the airport will be rounded down to read ‘‘(lat. 38 ° 04′ 37′′ N., long. 78 ° 56 ′ 39′′ W.)’’

The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative comments. It, therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

The FAA’s authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency’s authority.

This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section


### 34577 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations

40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority as it amends controlled airspace at Eagle’s Nest Airport, Waynesboro, VA.
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

**PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR**  **TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS** 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 1963 Comp., p. 389.

**§ 71.1 [Amended]**

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9U, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 18, 2010, effective September 15, 2010, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *
AEA VA E5 Waynesboro, VA [Amended] Eagle’s Nest Airport, VA

(Lat. 38 ° 04 ′ 37′′ N., long. 78 ° 56′ 39′′ W.) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.2 mile radius of Eagle’s Nest Airport, and within 2 miles either side of the 052 ° bearing from the airport extending from the 6.2-mile radius to 15.1 miles northeast of the airport, and within 2 miles either side of the 232 ° bearing from the airport extending from the 6.2-mile radius to 15.1 miles southwest of the airport.

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on May 25,

2011. Mark D. Ward, Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2011–14590 Filed 6–13–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE** 

**Bureau of Industry and Security**

**15 CFR Parts 740, 743, and 774**

**[Docket No. 110124056–1301–02]**

**RIN 0694–AF11**

**Wassenaar Arrangement 2010 Plenary Agreements Implementation:**  **Commerce Control List, Definitions, Reports; Correction** 

**AGENCY :**  Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.

**ACTION :**  Correcting amendments.

**SUMMARY :**  This document corrects errors in a final rule published by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) in the Federal Register on Friday, May 20, 2011 that revised the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by amending entries for certain items that are controlled for national security reasons in Categories 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Parts I & II, 6, 7, 8, and 9; adding and amending definitions to the EAR; and revising reporting requirements. That final rule contained errors concerning radial ball bearings, as well as editorial mistakes.

**DATES :**  Effective Date: This rule is effective: June 14, 2011.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For general questions contact Sharron Cook, Office of Exporter Services, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce at (202) 482–2440 or by e-mail: sharron.cook@bis.doc.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Background

On May 20, 2011, the final rule, ‘‘Wassenaar Arrangement 2010 Plenary Agreements Implementation: Commerce Control List, Definitions, Reports’’ was published in the Federal Register (76 FR 29610). The May 20th rule removed paragraph 2A001.b, ‘‘Other ball bearings and solid roller bearings, having all tolerances specified by the manufacturer in accordance with ISO 492 Tolerance Class 2 (or ANSI/ABMA Std 20 Tolerance Class ABEC–9 or RBEC–9, or other national equivalents), or better.’’ However, there is a subset of these ball bearings that are listed on the Missile Technology Control Regime Annex under 3.A.7, which provides: ‘‘Radial ball bearings having all tolerances specified in accordance with ISO 492 Tolerance Class 2 (or ANSI/ABMA Std 20 Tolerance Class ABEC–9 or other national equivalents), or better and having all the following characteristics: a. An inner ring bore diameter between 12 and 50 mm; b. An outer ring outside diameter between 25 and 100 mm; and c. A width between 10 and 20 mm.’’ Therefore, BIS is adding a new Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 2A101 to the Commerce Control List (CCL) (Supplement No. 1 to part 774) to control the export and reexport of these ball bearings. ECCN 2A101 is controlledfor Missile Technology (MT) and Antiterrorism (AT) reasons, more specifically MT column 1 and AT column 1. A license is required under MT Column 1 of the Commerce Country Chart (Supplement No. 1 to part 738) for export or reexport of ball bearings classified under ECCN 2A101 to all destinations, except Canada. License requirements and license review policy for MT controlled items are set forth in § 742.5 of the EAR. License requirements and license review policy for AT controlled items are set forth in §§ 742.8 Iran, 742.9 Syria, 742.10 Sudan, and 742.19 North Korea.

To harmonize with the addition of ECCN 2A101, this rule adds 2A101 to the list of ECCNs in § 740.2(a)(5)(ii) that are MT controlled, but may be exported or reexported under §§ 740.9(a)(2)(ii) (License Exception TMP) or 740.10 (License Exception RPL) as one-for-one replacements for equipment previously legally exported or reexported.

To harmonize with the text of the WA list, this rule removes the word ‘‘the’’ in the phrase ‘‘For the ‘multiple channel ADCs’ ’’ that appears in Technical Note 4 following paragraph 3A001.a.5.a.5.

To harmonize with the text of the WA list, this rule removes the word ‘‘converter’’ from the phrase ‘‘ADC converter units’’ in Technical Note 9 following paragraph 3A001.a.5.a.5.

To harmonize with the text of the WA list, this rule removes the Technical Note in the Items paragraph of ECCN 3E001.

This rule removes the Notes to paragraph (c)(1)(vi) in Section 743.1, because these notes relate to paragraphs 6A002.a.3 and 6A006.d, which were removed from Wassenaar reporting requirements in the May 20th rule.

This rule also removes paragraphs 6A005.a.1 and 6A006.g and .h from the limited restrictions under the TSR paragraph of the License Exception section of ECCNs 6E001 and 6E002. Paragraph 6A005.a.1 is removed because it is not listed on the Wassenaar Arrangement Sensitive or Very Sensitive Lists. Paragraph 6A006.g and .h are no longer in existence, as these paragraphs were removed from the CCL on July 15, 2005 (70 FR 41094, 41099).

This rule also removes paragraph 6A008.l.3 from Supplement No. 1 to part 740.11 ‘‘Additional Restrictions on Use of License Exception GOV.’’ The