alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) Monthly Inventory Report 

As of December 31, 2021 

(Million Units Except as Noted) 

CCC Commodity 

Unit of 

Measure 

Outstanding

Under Loan 

CY 2020 

Outstanding

Under Loan 

CY 2021 

CCC-Owned 

Inventory

(Actual Units) 

Butter Pounds - - -

Cheese Pounds - - -

Nonfat Dry Milk Pounds - - -

Barley Bushels 0.3 1.4 0.0 

Corn Bushels 12.3 362.8 0.0 

Oats Bushels 0.0 0.2 0.0 

Sorghum Cwt. 0.0 0.7 0.0 

Soybeans Bushels 2.2 65.3 0.0 

Wheat Bushels 1.9 8.0 0.0 

Rice Cwt. 0.4 27.7 0.0 

Refined Sugar Pounds 55.0 675.5 0.0 

 In-process Beet Pounds 0.0 709 0.0 

Raw Cane Sugar Pounds 0.0 787.3 0.0 

 In-process Cane Pounds - - -

Honey Pounds 2.1 2.7 0.0 

Peanuts 

Tons (not 

millions) 28,100.0 2,044,900.0 0.0 

Canola Seed* Cwt. 0.0 59.0 0.0 

Crambe* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Flaxseed* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Mustard Seed* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Rapeseed* Cwt. - - -

Safflower Seed* Cwt. 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Sesame Seed* Cwt. - - -

Sunflower Seed (Oil)* Cwt. 20.0 7.0 0.0 

Sunflower Seed (Other)* Cwt. 8.0 0.0 0.0 

Dry Peas* Cwt. 118.0 66.0 0.0 

Lentils* Cwt. 21.0 13.0 0.0 

Chickpeas* Cwt. 63.0 14.0 0.0 

Upland Cotton 

1,000 

Running 

Bales 3.6 3,535.8 0 

ELS Cotton 

1,000 

Running 

Bales 2.1 123.5 0 
Notes: 

• *Minor Oilseeds & Pulses are in thousand units.

• CCC acquired 2020 Crop Year Upland (if not specified) and ELS cotton because of the following

months' forfeited Marketing Assistance Loans:

o 22 bales from November 2021 and 85 bales from December 2021.

o An invitation sold all 22 bales in November and 85 bales in December.

o In total, there were 0 bales of cotton in inventory as of December 31, 2021.

Report Completed: January 26, 2022.
Bridgecrest Credit Company  OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE  The undersigned hereby certifies that he is a duly authorized officer of Bridgecrest Credit  Company (the “Servicer”), and that as such he is authorized to execute and deliver this certificate  in the name and on behalf of Bridgecrest Credit Company, and certifies that:  1. I have reviewed the activities of the Servicer during the period January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023 and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement; and 2. to the best of my knowledge, based on such review and other than described herein, the Servicer has substantially fulfilled all its obligations under the Servicing Agreement for the above referenced period. This certificate is delivered in accordance with Section 2.9 of the Carvana Auto Receivables 2022- P2 Servicing Agreement dated as of May 25, 2022, among Carvana Auto Receivables Trust 2022- P2, Computershare Trust Company, National Association and Bridgecrest Credit Company. This  certificate is dated as of December 31, 2023.  By: _______________________________  Daniel Gaudreau  Chief Financial Officer  /s/ Daniel Gaudreau Exhibit 35.1
#### Brian STACK, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Gregory MARTINEZ, Guard, Utah State Prison, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 17878.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Dec. 8, 1981.

*155Brian Stack, pro se.

David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Douglas C. Richards, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for defendant and respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a prisoner at the Utah State Prison, brought this action against respondent, a guard at the prison, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that his Eighth Amendment Constitutional rights had been violated. The question presented is whether the conduct of respondent, assuming the facts in appellant’s favor,1 is such as to constitute cruel and unusual punishment.

The facts, as alleged by appellant, are that respondent offered to illegally provide appellant with controlled substances if appellant would perform fellatio upon respondent. Respondent denies this allegation. On behalf of respondent, the State contends that even assuming the truthfulness of appellant’s claim, it is not actionable under § 1983.2

While appellant may have some basis for bringing an action in tort, it does not necessarily follow that the alleged action constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. The prohibition against such punishment is directed towards the type of punishment imposed for the violation of a criminal statute,3 rather than some incident or circumstance unassociated with the actual punishment.4

Here, the alleged conduct, although perhaps resulting from appellant’s confinement, is not incidental to the punishment for his criminal activity. Accordingly, we affirm the lower court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.5

STEWART, J., concurs in the result.

1

. Because of the nature of this allegation, we deem it important to point out that this matter did not proceed factually beyond the allegation stage, and we do not impute any wrong-doing on respondent’s part.

2

. Section 1983 provides for civil liability for any person who, under color of authority, subjects any other person to the deprivation of his constitutional or legal rights.

3

. *Powell v. State of Texas,*392 U.S. 514, 88 S.Ct. 2145, 20 L.Ed.2d 1254 (1968).

4

. *Lamb v. Hutto,*467 F.Supp. 562 (E.D.Va.1979); *Cook v. Whiteside,*505 F.2d 32 (5th Cir.1974); and Fisher v. Woodson, 373 F.Supp. 970 (E.D.Va.1973).

5

. Rule 12(b)(6), U.R.C.P.
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 
Banorablo 6. F. Hlokerson CountyAuditor E!ontgomery

County Conroe, '=0X80

Tour reqwet ror 

## runy conaldered by this da quest as rouow8: _ n reoeiredbl oweuots froul

your rareed **by** me, an to dfsagreewl th8t thediSr OOUTt8 Of th the di8trfot opinion it wtm not u88 set up to furrry on the **work.** thi8VieUpOint,uh8t WOUid r the legality of supplyingthle srred to in your letter. ion la oorreot. A oopy of this opfn-&bnorsble A. F, ~OkOC80~, P8m 2 It is therefore our opinion that the Commia8loner8* Court ha8 no ruthorlty to expend County funds for SUpp11CrS and stationeryfor a Qiatrlot oourtraportw. Ve.ri truly your8

,!
U.S. GOVERNMENT 

INCIDENT MANAGEMENT 

PROCESS

Industry Day 2022

11/22/2021 FACG 2021 1
What is the Incident Management Process (IMP)?

11/22/2021 FACG 2021 2

IMP

Response

Resolution

Recovery

Mitigation

Prevention

Analysis
What does the IMP do? • Streamline the incident response process 

in order to: – Minimize losses and damages – Protect institutional image – Prevent adverse impacts to human 

health and environment

• Builds an incident database – Identification of root causes – Development of action registries for 

corrective and preventive actions

• Allows for continuous improvement

11/22/2021 FACG 20213
Incident Management Champions

Incident Management 

Champion (IMC): the main 

points of contact for the 

USG Incident Management 

Process

• Main recipient of 

complaints, converting 

them into incident cases

• Assembles Incident 

Resolution Teams (IRTs)

• Prepares Incident 

Reports and Incident 

Updates

• Creates Incident 

Database

• Develops Incident Action 

Registry

11/22/2021 FACG 2021 4
Incident Resolution Teams

Incident Resolution Team 

(IRT): a case-specific group 

convened to discuss and 

facilitate response to a 

specific incident

• Assigns a technical lead 

depending on the nature 

of the incident

• Provides technical 

guidance to the IMC, 

senior management 

teams, and other 

stakeholders

• Leads to a prompt 

resolution of the incident 

and provides technical 

updates as needed

11/22/2021 FACG 2021 5
WBSCM Complaints Module

11/22/2021 FACG 2021 6
WBSCM Complaints Module cont.

11/22/2021 FACG 2021 7
IMP Flowchart

11/22/2021 FACG 2021 8

Incident 

Reporting

Incident 

Processing

Data/evidence 

Compilation

Incident 

Resolution

Implementation of 

Preventive/

Corrective 

Actions

Action 

Registry

Partners

Field Offices

Recipients

Contractors
Thank you!

Samira Traore

samtraore@usaid.gov

3/16/2017 FOOTER GOES HERE 9
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 25, 2012 

d0118 

Order 

 

January 25, 2012 

142324(60) 

LEE M. KHAN, a/k/a LEE M. KAHAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142324 

 COA: 293991 

Genesee CC: 08-089357-CZ 

CITY OF FLINT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 29, 2011 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

 MARILYN KELLY and HATHAWAY, JJ., would grant reconsideration.
J. Parker Erkmann

T: +1 202 776 2036 perkmann@cooley.com VIA REGULATIONS.GOV AND EMAIL

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AV ENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004

- 2400 T: (202) 842

- 7800 F: (202) 842

- 7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM February 6, 2015

Mr. Paul Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation U.S. Department of Transportation

Room W86

- 316 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

RE: Polling Results for Application of JetBlue Airways Corporation for Exemption Authority (US

- Grenada)

, DOT

- OST

- 2015

- 0019

- 0001

Dear Mr. Gretch:



### We have polled and received non

- objections from each of the carriers on the

attached servi ce list for the above

- referenced application of JetBlue Airways Corporation (“JetBlue”)

. Prompt approval is requested so that JetBlue can secure foreign authority, make final operating plans and begin the marketing of the flights between New York (JFK)

and Grenada well in advance of operations, which JetBlue plan s to commence on or about

J une 11 , 2015, provided all necessary approvals have been secured.

Sincerely,

J. Parker Erkmann Counsel for JetBlue Airways Corporation

JPE:ecMr. Paul Gretch February 6, 2015 Page Two

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AV ENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004

- 2400 T: (202) 842

- 7800 F: (202) 842

- 7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM 

### Service List

howard.kass@aa.com
robert.wirick@aa.com American

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com
chris.walker@delta.com Delta

cristinasa@state.gov john.s.duncan@faa.gov robert.finamore@dot.gov brett.kruger@dot.gov brian.hedberg@dot.gov Darren.jaffe@dot.gov

reese.davidso n@dot.gov Paul.Gretch@dot.gov brubinst@panynj.gov JFK

113838128 v1