alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1








I, Susan B. Sheffield, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-3  (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  The Bank of New York Mellon.








By:/s/ Susan B. SheffieldName:Susan B. SheffieldTitle:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:March 4, 2024
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 9, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50462 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RICARDO JASSO-CUEVAS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-2441-ALL-PRM

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ricardo JassoCuevas raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    |  /s/                    Nancy J. McGurk                                     |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  |  Nancy                    J. McGurk                                         |
| Title: |  Chief                    Financial Officer of the Managing General Partner |
| Date:  |  May                    15, 2006                                            |
##### 



POLYPORE, INC.
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Polypore, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 16, 2005
    
    /s/ Lynn AmosLynn AmosChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2021-4 Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and


5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  U.S. Bank National Association.

Date:  June 16, 2023



|                                                     | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
|Paul C. Honda                                        | 
|Vice President and Assistant Secretary               | 
|American Honda Finance Corporation                   | 
|(senior officer in charge of the servicing function) | 



---
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of ALSP Orchid Acquisition Corporation I (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year period ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Thong Q. Le, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuantto §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

Dated: March 31, 2022 

 

/s/ Thong Q. Le
Thong Q. LeChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)**
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 469 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.469
                                    Agreed to September 18, 2002        

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
          the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on September 
19, 2002, for a ceremony to present the Congressional Gold Medal to 
General Henry H. Shelton (USA, Ret.). Physical preparations for the 
ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 
Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41144 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE NATIVIDAD GONZALEZ-PARDO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-746-ALL

-------------------- Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Natividad Gonzalez-Pardo (Gonzalez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gonzalez has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not filed a response. Our review of the brief filed by counsel and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leaveNo. 04-41144 -2- to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
This is a draft document and does not represent a definitive view of the agency on the questions 

addressed.

This and other guidance documents are accessible on the U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency 

& Renewable Energy web site at: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/guidance/default.aspx?pid=2&spid=1.

Guidance Type: Test Procedures 

Category: Residential Products 

Product: Central Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps

Sub Product: Split and package systems

Guidance Version: DRAFT 

Issued: August 19, 2014 

Comment Period Ends: September 19, 2014 

The following is a draft U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) guidance document 

regarding the test procedure for central air conditioners. This draft guidance document represents the 

Department’s interpretation of its existing regulations and is exempt from the notice and comment 

requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act. See 5 U.S.C. § 553(b)(A). Nonetheless, the 

Department is accepting comments and suggestions from the public until September 19, 2014. 

Comments and suggestions should be provided in WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, PDF, or text file format 

by sending an email to CACBlowerCoil2014GUID0033@ee.doe.gov. Please also include the docket 

number EERE-2014-BT-GUID-0033. Submitted comments are public and may be reviewed at Docket 

EERE-2014-BT-GUID-0033 on regulations.gov; if you wish to submit confidential business information as 

part of your comment, please contact DOE at the above email address. At the end of the comment 

period, this draft guidance document may be adopted, revised, or withdrawn. 

Q: When can I test and rate a split-system central air conditioner with a blower-coil indoor unit?

A: Split-system central air conditioners other than those with single-speed compressors may be tested 

and rated using a blower-coil only if the condensing unit is sold exclusively for use with a boiler-coil 

indoor unit. 10 CFR 429.16(a)(2)(ii). There is no provision in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

permitting use of a blower-coil for testing and rating a split-system central air conditioner where the 

condensing unit is also offered for sale with a coil-only indoor unit. Furthermore, there is no provision in 

the CFR permitting the use of a blower-coil for testing and rating a condensing unit with a single-speed 

compressor.
Exhibit
4.10


 


TRUST
DECLARATION


 


THIS
DECLARATION made as of the 1st day of October, 2020.


 


WHEREAS
the undersigned is the registered owner of 260,000 ordinary shares (the “Trust Shares”) in the capital stock of
B.Y.B.Y. Investments and Promotions Ltd. (the “Corporation”);


 


AND
WHEREAS the Trust Shares represent 26% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Corporation.


 


NOW
THEREFORE THIS DEED WITNESSETH THAT:


 


1.
I, Dalya Bzizinsky, hereby declare and acknowledge that I hold title to the Trust Shares as bare trustee for and solely on behalf of
BYND - Beyond Solutions Ltd. (the “Beneficiary”) and I otherwise have no legal or beneficial interest in the
Trust Shares.


 


2.
I agree to hold the Trust Shares for and on behalf of the Beneficiary and to deal therewith only as directed by the
Beneficiary.


 


3.
I will do no act or thing, or institute any action or proceeding of any nature respecting the Trust Shares. The only act which I am
obliged to perform is to transfer the Trust Shares as directed by the Beneficiary.


 


4.
All benefits and burdens arising from the Trust Shares, including but not limited to dividends, including stock dividends and other
distributions, whether of capital or income, that may from time to time be payable on the Trust Shares belong legally and
beneficially to the Beneficiary and this Declaration shall act as a direction to the Corporation to make all such payments to the
Beneficiary.


 


5.
This Declaration shall be binding upon and enure to the benefit of my heirs, estate trustees, successors and assigns and the heirs,
estate trustees, successors and assigns of Beneficiary.


 


[remainder
of page intentionally left blank - signature page to follow]


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereto set my hand and seal as of the date first above written.


 


	IN
    THE PRESENCE OF:	 	)	 
	 	 	)	 
	 	 	)	 
	 	 	)	 
	 	 	)	“Dalia
    Brzezinski”
	Witness	 	)	Dalia
    Brzezinski
	 	 	)	 


 


The
Corporation hereby acknowledges the direction contained herein.


 


	 	B.Y.B.Y.
    INVESTMENTS AND PROMOTIONS LTD.
	 	 	 
	 	Per:	“Yftah
    Ben Yaackov” 
	 	 	Yftah
    Ben Yaackov, ASO


 


The
undersigned beneficial owner, having read the foregoing hereby acknowledges and agrees with the terms hereof.


 


	 	BYND
    – BEYOND SOLUTIONS LTD.
	 	 	 
	 	Per:	“Moti
    Maram”
	 	 	Moti
    Maram, President








 









    	2
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEXAS ELPASO, TEXAS

RO SA M AR I A A RRO YO S, Ap pe lla nt,
v.
TH E ST AT E O F TE XA S, Appellee
. § § § § § § No . 0 8- 11 -0 02 41 -C R

Appea l from the Criminal District Court No. 1 of El Pa so County , T e xas (TC# 20090D01654)

M EM OR

AN DU M OP IN ION This appea l is before the Court on its own moti on to determine whether it should be dismiss ed. Concludingthat there is no appea lable orde r, we dismiss the appe al for w ant of jurisdiction. On September

8, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified the par ties by letter of the Court’s intent to dism iss the appea l for wa nt of jurisdiction beca

use there does not appe ar to be an appea lable orde r. In response to the Clerk’s letter , Appellant’s attorney notified the Court that no judgme nt has bee n enter ed and the case is stil l pending in the trial court. Counsel states that she has no objec tion to the appeal be ing dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Ac cording ly , the appe al is dismi ssed. See Pe tty

v . S tate , 800 S.W .2d 582, 583 (Tex.App.--Ty ler 1990, no pet.)(“ Gene rally , this Court onl y has jurisdiction to consider a n appea l where there has bee n a judgme nt of conviction, and a n appea l does not lie from the g rantingor re fusing of an interlocutory

or pre liminary

order .”).-2-

September 30, 2011 DAVI D WEL L I NGTONCHEW, C hief Just ice B e f o r e C h e w , C
. J. , M c C l ur e , a n d R i v e r a , JJ. (Do Not Publish)
Hon. D. W. Burkhalter

Acting County Attorney Box 953 Tbroekmorton,

Texas
Dear Sir: Opillloll 180. o-6692 Re: Is the clause in a contract for collectionof delinquenttaxes permitting the eontract or six months after the temlnation of the oontract to prosecute anlts filed to fFna1 judgmentsvalid? And a related gueation.
You have requested our opinion upon the following questions:

1. Is the clause In a delinquenttax contract permittingthe contractorsix months after tbs t8rminatlon of the eontraot to posecute suits to final jud&mentsvalid, and is the tax attorney entitled to his oommlaslonson all taxes so collectedduring this six months period?

2. Is the delinquenttax attorney entitled to collect the costs that have been paid in to the collector, when he has not done anything except file suit? If not, who 1s entitled to such costs?

This departmentla opinionRo. 0-237A, a copy of which is enclosed, held that under contra&s similar to the one in which you are interested,suits for delinquenttaxes flied by the tax attorney during the contract ,period and settledby h%m within SIX months after th6 terminati.on date are clearly contemplated by the contract,and that the commissionto be received by the attorney applies without question. We therefore answer your first question in the affirmative.Hon. D. W. Burkhalter,page 2 (O-6692)

Article 7332, V. A. C. S., provides the fees certain officialsreoelve In suits for collectionof dellnquent taxes, and being a later statute than Articles 7335 and 7335a, controls' over any provisions contrary thereto. ArtIdle 7333 provides that the fees mentioned in Article 7332 are taxed as costs in delinquenttax sul.ts.We call your attentton to that portion of Article 7332 wherein It is provided that where delinquenttaxes are collectedunder contractsbetween the commissioners court and others for the oollectlonof such taxes, the fees provided for county and district attorneysare not assessed or collected. Therefore, In your case, there are no fees which the county attorney or tax attorney could claim. If any such fees were assessed and collected,they should be returned to the taxpayer.Under the delinquenttax contractpertinent to this opinion, the tax attorney receives lC$ of the amount of all delinquenttaxes, penalty and interest actually collectedand paid to the tax collectordurFng the term of the aontract,which the tax attorney was instrumentalin collecting. If the filing of the suits by the tax attorney was instrumentalin collectingthe taxes, he Fs entitled to his commissions;if they were not, he is not entFtled to his oommissions. This Is a question of fact depending upon each separate case*
Yours very ATTORNEYGENERAL
BY truly

OFTEKAS 0. Koch 0. Koch ROK:AMM:mjs Enclosure
APPROVED AUG 10, 1945 /&y;~;,~;~w ATTCREEY GRNRRAL' Assistant

APPROVED OPINION COMMITTEE BY /s/BWB CHAIRMAN