alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32.1 **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                    |                                                              |                                |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
| Dated                this 7th                day                of February, 2007. | By:                                                     | /s/                Liang Zhang |
|                                                                                    | Liang                Zhang Chief                Executive Officer |

----
**Exhibit
      32.1**






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months period
      ended March 31, 2008 of the MACROshares Oil Down Holding Trust (the
      " **Registrant** "),
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      " **Quarterly**  **Report** "),
      I,
      Samuel Masucci, III, principal executive officer of MACRO Securities Depositor,
      LLC, which acts as the depositor for the Registrant (the " **Depositor** "),
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly represents,
                in all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
                of the
                Registrant.






Date:
      May
      15, 2008








/s/
        Samuel Masucci, III
 Samuel
        Masucci, III
 Chief
        Executive Officer of the Depositor,
 on
        behalf
        of the Registrant
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Lawrence Lee, Chief Financial
Officer of Synutra International, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his
knowledge, that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months
ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      February 9, 2009/s/
      Lawrence LeeName:
      Lawrence LeeTitle: Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The
foregoing certification is being furnished with the Company’s Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**INTERLINE BRANDS, INC.**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Interline Brands, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Michael J. Grebe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Michael J. Grebe                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael J. Grebe                       |   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |
| November 10, 2005                 |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 295 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 295

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 20 (legislative day, December 18), 2001

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the sine die adjournment of the first session of the One 
                       Hundred Seventh Congress.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, 
December 20, 2001, or Friday, December 21, 2001, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 

designee, it stand adjourned sine die, or until Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate adjourns at the close 
of business on Thursday, December 20, 2001, or Friday, December 21, 
2001, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned sine die, or until 
Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble at 
such place and time as they may designate whenever, in their opinion, 
the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 20, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Walter HAYES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-79-735.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Aug. 13, 1981.

*752Tom J. Laub, Okmulgee, for appellant.

Jan Eric Cartwright, Atty. Gen., Danny K. Shadid, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRETT, Presiding Judge:

Walter Hayes has appealed his conviction of Manslaughter in the First Degree in the District Court of Okmulgee County. He argues that it was error for the trial court to give an instruction on First Degree Manslaughter, that a statement given by him to the police should have been suppressed and that it was an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court to suspend a part of the sentence, but not all of it. We affirm.

I

The appellant was charged with Murder in the First Degree, and he argues that no instruction on Manslaughter should have been given, because there was no evidence of any heat of passion. The trial court told the jury in the manslaughter instructions that “heat of passion” could result from fear or terror, as well as from anger. This is a correct statement of law. *Wood v. State,*486 P.2d 750 (Okl.Cr.1971). The appellant’s defense at the trial was that he shot his victim in self-defense, and he testified that he “really was scared” when the man came at him with a knife. Under the facts of this case, it was appropriate for the trial court to instruct the jury on manslaughter.

II

When the police officers went to the appellant’s home to investigate the killing, the appellant was advised of his *Miranda*rights. He said he understood them and gave a statement. Two days later he gave a different statement. At the trial the appellant sought to suppress the second statement on the ground that he should have been advised of his rights the second time.

According to the evidence, the appellant was not being questioned when he gave the second statement; he asked to talk to the police officers. He had been informed of his rights and had chosen not to exercise them. The second statement was voluntarily given and was admissible.

Ill

The jury set the appellant’s sentence at ten years in prison. He asked the district court for a suspended sentence and the court suspended half of it. The appellant recognizes that the decision to suspend all or part of a sentence is vested in the trial court’s discretion, 22 O.S.Supp.1980, § 991a, but he argues that because of his advanced age of seventy-four years and poor physical condition that it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to refuse to suspend the entire sentence. Based on the record before this Court, we do not find an abuse of discretion. We do note, however, that 22 O.S., § 994, gives the appellant an opportunity to ask the district court to reconsider the possibility of suspending the rest of the sentence. The application must be filed within ten days from the final order of this Court.

The judgment and sentence are affirmed.

BUSSEY, and CORNISH, JJ., concur.
**DESIGN
      SOURCE, INC.**


(A
      Development Stage Enterprise)




Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of **Design Source, Inc.** (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended **December
      31, 2007** as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “Report”),
      I, Peter Reichard, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated
      this 14th day of February, 2008.




/s/
                Peter ReichardPeter
                  ReichardChief
                Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 374 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 374

Commending the District of Columbia National Guard, the National Guard 
    Bureau, and the entire Department of Defense for the assistance 
      provided to the United States Capitol Police and the entire 
   Congressional community in response to the terrorist and anthrax 
                 attacks of September and October 2001.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 11, 2002

   Mr. Ney submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Commending the District of Columbia National Guard, the National Guard 
    Bureau, and the entire Department of Defense for the assistance 
      provided to the United States Capitol Police and the entire 
   Congressional community in response to the terrorist and anthrax 
                 attacks of September and October 2001.

Whereas the terrorist and anthrax attacks of September and October 2001 required 
        Congress and the entire Congressional community to respond to a 
        heightened state of emergency;
Whereas the men and women of the United States Capitol Police were required to 
        shoulder the greatest burden of this emergency response by working 
        tremendously increased hours under difficult conditions, requiring great 
        sacrifices by them and their families;
Whereas the District of Columbia National Guard responded to the call of the 
        Capitol Police Board and provided National Guard troops to assist the 
        United States Capitol Police in protecting the Capitol complex, 
        providing great relief to the members of the United States Capitol 
        Police; and
Whereas the combined efforts of the United States Capitol Police and the 
        District of Columbia National Guard have made the Capitol complex secure 
        for Members of Congress, Congressional employees, and visitors, and 
        thereby have enabled Congress to continue to discharge its 
        constitutional duties on behalf of the American people: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress commends the District of Columbia National Guard, the 
National Guard Bureau, and the entire Department of Defense for the 
assistance provided to the United States Capitol Police and the entire 
Congressional community in response to the terrorist and anthrax 
attacks of September and October 2001.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 460 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 460

  Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the use of force against 
                                 Iraq.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 4, 2002

  Mr. LaHood submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the use of force against 
                                 Iraq.

Whereas Iraq has engaged in wars of aggression against its neighbors, including 
        the invasion of Kuwait in 1990;
Whereas Iraq has developed weapons of mass destruction, including chemical and 
        biological agents, and has previously used these weapons against other 
        nations and on its own citizens;
Whereas Iraq has violated United Nations Security Council resolutions by 
        expelling United Nations weapon inspectors that were working under the 
        primary cease fire agreement for the Gulf War (Security Council 
        Resolution 687); and
Whereas the President of the United States has expressed concern that Iraq has 
        continued to develop weapons of mass destruction: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the President may order acts of 
war against a foreign or other entity only in the following 
circumstances: in compliance with a treaty obligation or to repel a 
military attack against United States territory, possessions, or Armed 
Forces engaged in peaceful maneuvers; to participate in humanitarian 
rescue operations; or in response to a declaration or resolution of 
prior specific approval by a majority of the Members of each House of 
Congress.
                                 <all>
```
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER OF A BATEMENT

Appellate case name: Hassell Construction Company, Inc., and James C. Hassel v. R. Hassell & Co., Inc., R. Hassell Builders, Inc., R. Hassell Holding Co.,

Inc. and G.R. Group Resources, LLP

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 00546

- CV

Trial court case number: 2013

- 61995

Trial court: 61st District Court of Harris County



### The Court was informed that the parties have mediated their disputes in a related federal bankruptcy procee ding and they have reached “[a]n agreement in principal . . . that would settle the disputes in this appeal; however, the agreement must be approved by the bankruptcy court.” 1 

### A hearing before the bankruptcy court is scheduled for June 10, 2019.

We abate the appeal. No later than July 10, 2019

, the parties shall file a motion to reinstate and dismiss the appeal, a motion to reinstate and proceed with the appeal, or a report advising the Court of the status of the settlement negotiations and bankruptcy

pro ceedings. If the parties do not respond as directed, the case may be reinstated on the Court’s active docket and the appeal will proceed under the applicable Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed fr om this Court’s active

docket.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___

/s/ Russell Lloyd

___ Acting individually

Date: ___ June 4, 2019

___

1 William P. Haddock and Pendergraft & Simon, LLP filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for appellees, R. Hassell Holding Company, Inc., R. Hassell & Company, Inc., and R. Hassell Builders, Inc. The motion to withdraw was disposed of in a separate order.
AMENDMENT TO THE PERKINELMER 1998 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 AMENDMENT 
 TO THE PERKINELMER, INC. 
 1998 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 
  
 Pursuant to the authority reserved to the Compensation and Benefits Committee
(the “Committee”) of PerkinElmer, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), under Section 17 of the EG&G, Inc. 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) and the Committee Charter, the Committee hereby
amends the Plan as follows, effective as of July 1, 2005: 
  
 1.
Any references in the Plan to “EG&G, Inc.”, including, without limitation, in the title and preliminary paragraph thereof, are hereby deleted and replaced with “PerkinElmer, Inc.” 
  
 2. The first and second paragraphs of Section 9 of the Plan are deleted in
their entirety and replaced with the following: 
  
 “On the Offering Commencement Date of each Offering Period, the Company will grant to each eligible employee who is then a participant in the Plan an option (an “Option”) to purchase on the last business day of such Offering
Period (the “Exercise Date”) at the applicable purchase price (the “Option Price”) the largest number of whole shares of Common Stock of the Company as does not exceed the employee’s accumulated payroll deductions as of the
Exercise Date divided by the Option Price for such Offering Period; provided, however, that no employee may be granted an Option which permits his rights to purchase Common Stock under this Plan and any other employee stock purchase plan (as defined
in Section 423(b) of the Code) of the Company and its subsidiaries, to accrue at a rate which exceeds $25,000 of the fair market value of such Common Stock for each calendar year in which the Option is outstanding at any time. 
  
 The Committee shall determine the Option Price for each
Offering Period, including whether such Option Price (i) shall be determined based on the lesser of the closing price of the Common Stock on the first business day of the Offering Period or on the Exercise Date, or (ii) shall be determined based
solely on the closing price of the Common Stock on the Exercise Date; provided, however, that such Option Price shall be at least 85% of the applicable closing price. With respect to Offering Periods commencing on or after July 1, 2005, the Option
Price shall be 95% of the closing price of the Common Stock on the Exercise Date, unless a different Exercise Price is established by the Committee prior to the Offering Commencement Date of the Offering Period to which such Exercise Price is to
apply. “Closing price” shall be the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange. If no sales of Common Stock were made on such a day, the closing price shall be the reported closing price for the next preceding day on which sales were
made.” 
  
 With the exception of these amendments, all other
provisions of the Plan are hereby ratified and confirmed as continuing in full force and effect. 
  
 ADOPTED by the Compensation and Benefits Committee on April 7, 2005. 
  

	
	 /s/    RICHARD F.
WALSH        


	 Senior Vice President
 PerkinElmer, Inc.