alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      31.2




TOT
      Energy, Inc.


550
      West
      Cypress Creek Road-Suite 410


Ft.
      Lauderdale, Florida, 33309




August
      14, 2008




Securities
      and Exchange Commission


100
      F
      Street, NE


Washington,
      DC 20549




Re:
      Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of TOT Energy Inc. for the quarter ended
      June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the “Report”), I, Mike Zoi, Chief Executive Officer of TOT Energy Inc.,
      hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1)
            such
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TOT Energy Inc., for the quarter
                ended
                June 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
            the
                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TOT
                Energy
                Inc., for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                TOT Energy Inc.





BY:/s/
                Mike ZoiMike
                Zoi
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer and Duly Authorized
                Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to TOT Energy Inc. and will be
      retained by TOT Energy Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.




In
      accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-B, this certification is
      being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to TOT Energy Inc.’s quarterly report and
      shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the
      liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference
      in
      any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as
      expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

ROBERT E. CLARIDY , Petitioner ,
v. Cas e No. 5D22-1799 L.T. Case No. 20 13

- CF

- 739

STATE OF FLORIDA , Respondent

. ________________________________/ Opinion filed October 28, 2022 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction. Robert E. Claridy , Raiford, pro se. No Appearance for Respondent. PER CURIAM. Due to Petitioner’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgment and sentence in Putna m County Circuit Court Case No. 20 13

- CF

- 739 , this Court issued an order directing Petitioner to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer , 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having carefully considered the response and finding it fails2

to show cause w hy sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that Petitioner is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings. Therefore, in order to conserve judicial resources, the Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the above referenced case. Any future filings regarding the referenced case will be summarily rejected by the Clerk unless filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State , 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”). The Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary proceedings. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (20 2 2 ); Simpkins v. State , 909 So. 2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). FUTURE PRO SE FILINGS PROHIBITED.
LAMBERT , C.J., WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
[No. 36763-3-I.

Division One.

June 10, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Obie Lee Crisp, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-1-00260-5, Patricia H. Aitken J., entered June 5, 1995. *Dismissed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
**EXHIBIT      32.2 **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                 |                                                              |                                |
|------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
| Dated                this 7th day of February, 2007. | By:                                                     | /s/                Jibin Zhang |
|                                                 | Jibin                Zhang Chief                Financial Officer |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 490 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 490

 To express the sense of Congress concerning the United States and its 
                 dependence on foreign sources of oil.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2002

  Mr. Graves submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 To express the sense of Congress concerning the United States and its 
                 dependence on foreign sources of oil.

Whereas American demand for energy will continue to grow;
Whereas the United States must not continue to rely upon turbulent regions to 
        supply its oil;
Whereas the United States currently imports oil produced by Iraq, a country the 
        government of which the Secretary of State has determined has repeatedly 
        provided support for acts of international terrorism;
Whereas American investment in foreign oil markets potentially could help fund 
        terrorist operations;
Whereas national security could be compromised by dealing with countries 
        friendly to terrorist organizations;
Whereas American investment focused on domestic energy production would lessen 
        our dependence on oil from regimes who do not fully cooperate in the war 
        on terrorism;
Whereas renewable fuel sources present unlimited potential for the United States 
        to become self-reliant for our energy needs; and
Whereas a domestic focus on energy exploration and production would create jobs: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) the United States must systematically reduce its 
        reliance on foreign oil sources;
            (2) the United States must increase domestic oil 
        exploration and production;
            (3) the United States must expedite the development of 
        alternative fuel sources, particularly ethanol and biodiesel;
            (4) the United States must reevaluate its relationships 
        with noncooperative, secretive regimes; and
            (5) our Nation should develop a long overdue comprehensive 
        energy policy that promotes domestic energy research and 
        development and provides for the security and diversity of the 
        American energy supply.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Roebling  Financial Corp, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  December  31, 2006 (the
"Report")  as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof, we, Frank J. Travea,  III,  President and Chief Executive  Officer,  and
Janice A. Summers,  Senior Vice  President,  Chief  Operating  Officer and Chief
Financial Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Frank J. Travea, III                  /s/ Janice A. Summers
-------------------------------------     --------------------------------------
Frank J. Travea, III                      Janice A. Summers
President and Chief Executive Officer     Senior Vice President, Chief Operating
                                          Officer and Chief Financial Officer

February 9, 2007
Executive Officer Summary Compensation Sheet



 Exhibit 10.17 
  
 Executive Officer Summary Compensation Sheet 
  
 Annual Cash Compensation for Senior Executive Officers 
  
 The annual cash compensation for Executive Officers of Verity, as of July 31,
2005, was as follows: 
  

									
	 Executive Officer

	  	Annual
Base Salary

	 	 	Target
Incentive at
Plan

	 
	 Gary J. Sbona – Executive Chairman of the Board
	  	$	52,000	 	 	 
 	Not
applicable	 
 
	 Anthony J. Bettencourt – President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	500,000	 	 	$	175,000	*
	 Steven R. Springsteel – Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	360,000	 	 	$	180,000	 
	 Sunil D. Nagdev – Senior Vice President, Professional Services and Technical Support
	  	$	265,000	 	 	$	125,000	 
	 Michael D. Mooney – Senior Vice President, North American Sales and Business Development
	  	$	290,000	 	 	$	175,000	 
	 Hugo Sluimer– Senior Vice President, EMEA and APAC Operations
	  	€	240,000	**	 	€	220,000	**
	 Mark Seamans – Senior Vice President, Research and Development
	  	$	283,000	 	 	$	141,500	 
	 Nicole Eagan – Senior Vice President of Marketing and Chief Marketing Officer
	  	$	275,000	 	 	$	137,500	 

  

	*	Mr. Bettencourt’s fiscal 2006 target incentive bonus, as well as the parameters for assessment of attainment of goals, have not yet been determined. 


 

	**	Euro exchange rate as of July 31, 2005 was $1.2129 per €1. 

  
 Cash Bonus Arrangements for Executive Officers Other than Chief Executive Officer 
  
 The Board of Directors approved the Fiscal 2006 Executive Variable
Compensation Plan, as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Metrics for determining percentage of goal attainment are weighted as follows: 

  

	 	a.	1/3 for attainment of Company revenue targets; 

  

	 	b.	1/3 for attainment of Company operating income targets; 

  

	 	c.	1/3 for individual MBOs (management objectives). 

  

	 	2.	No payout if less than 90% of the goal is reached. 

  

	 	3.	For 90% to 100% of goal attainment, target incentive is paid out 50% to 100% on a linear basis based on level of attainment. 

  

	 	4.	For 100% to 130% of goal attainment, target incentive is paid out 100% to 200% on a linear basis based on level of attainment, with 200% being a maximum bonus payable.


  

	 	5.	Both quarterly revenue and profit goal thresholds must be attained prior to any bonus funding for that quarter. Additionally, no quarter will be funded for a bonus greater than 100%
unless each quarter of the fiscal year achieves the minimum of 90% of Company plan threshold. 

  

 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7401

IRVING FOYE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES M. CONDON,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-00-912-9-17RB)

Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: March 1, 2001

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Irving Foye, Appellant Pro Se. Derrick K. McFarland, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Irving Foye seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Foye v. South Carolina, No. CA-00-912-9-17RB (D.S.C.

filed Sept. 11, 2000; entered Sept. 12, 2000). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, May 1, 2012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marianne Dominguez at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7978.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Project Committee will be held Tuesday, May 1, 2012, at 11 a.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Marianne Dominguez. For more information please contact Ms. Dominguez at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7978, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: March 28, 2012.

Louis Morizio,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2012-8421 Filed 4-6-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Beauty Supply of
New Jersey Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carmine Catizone,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Carmine Catizone
-----------------------------
Carmine Catizone
Chief Executive Officer

May 15, 2008


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Beauty Supply of
New Jersey Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel Generelli,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Daniel Generelli
-----------------------------
Daniel Generelli
Chief Financial Officer

May 15, 2008
May 10, 2010 

NOTE TO THE DOCKET: 

On March 9, 2010, EPA staff participated in a meeting with INGAA, which involved a general 

discussion about the tailoring rule proposal. 

Attendees: 

Ravindra Kura, El Paso Corp. 

Bruce Moore, EPA 

Roberto Jackson, Dominion Resources 

Mary Beth Whitfield, Williams Gas Pipeline 

Troy Meinke, Alliance Pipeline 

Lisa Conner, EPA 

Juan Santiago, EPA 

Dave Svendsgaard, EPA 

Lisa Beal, INGAA 

Anna Wood, OPAR (via phone)
InThe Matter Of: COMAIR, INC. Respondent 

### SERVED: OCTOBER 1, 2014
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC
) ) ) ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2014-0319 CaseNo. 2011S0271013

ORDERDISMISSING PROCEEDING OnAugust 14, 2014, an Order Setting Rule 16litigation Scheduling Conference and Directing Rule 26(f) Planning and Submission was filed. This Order set the Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference for October 8, 2014, at 11 :00 a.m. Eastern time, and set October 1, 2014, as the deadline for filing a proposed scheduling/discovery plan. On September 30,2014, the Respondent filed a Withdrawal ofRequest for Hearing and Answer, stating thatthe parties have reached a settlement and requesting that this proceedingbe dismissed withprejudice. After havingreviewedthe case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

### 1. The October 1, 2014 deadline for filing a proposed scheduling/discovery plan is cancelled. 2. The Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference set for October 8, 2014, at 11:00 a.m. Easterntime is cancelled. 3. Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, the Respondent has withdrawn its Request for Hearing, andthis proceeding is dismissed with prejudice.

Attachment: Service List ·.:**~_.**SERVICE LIST- BYU.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building-Suite2W1000 1

Mr. Christopher R. Stevenson 

### Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, ASO-7 ONE COPY

Federal Aviation Administration, Southern Region 1701 ColumbiaAvenue College Park, GA 30337 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 Mr. Robert P. Silverberg 

### Respondent's Counsel 1101 30th Street, N.W. Suite 120 Washington, DC 20007 Judge J.E. Sullivan 

### US. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0319 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### Samuel Meinhard, M. H. Schaul and Henry S. Meinhard, Partners Doing Business as Meinhard, Schaul & Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. L. B. Pooser, Defendant in Error.

(Supreme Court of Florida. Division B,

May 31, 1905.)

Writ of Error to Circuit Court, .Jackson county; Charles B. Parkhill, Judge. ■

*Robert J. Boone,*for Plaintiffs in Error.

*407*Liddon*& *Smith,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs in error against the defendant in error. There was judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiffs take writ of error. The judgment is affirmed.

Decision
(a)  A review of Exeter Finance
        LLC’s activities and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2021 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among Exeter Holdings Trust 2021-3, EFCAR, LLC, Exeter Finance LLC, as servicer (in such capacity, the
        “Servicer”), Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-3, and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee and backup servicer, during the period from August 25, 2021 to December 31, 2021 has been made under my supervision.
 
 (b)  To the best of my
        knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.
 
  
 By:  /s/ Ben Miller