alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 362

Encouraging employers who employ members of the National Guard and

Reserve components of the Armed Forces to provide a pay differential

benefit and an extension of employee benefits to such members while

they serve on active duty, and commending employers who already provide such benefits.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 20, 2002

Mr. BROWN of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina,

Mr. GRAHAM, and Mr. DEMINT) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Encouraging employers who employ members of the National

Guard and Reserve components of the Armed Forces

to provide a pay differential benefit and an extension

of employee benefits to such members while they serve

on active duty, and commending employers who already

provide such benefits.

Whereas the United States continues to rely on the National

Guard and Reserve components of the Armed Forces to

protect the national security interests of the United

States at home and abroad;
2

•HCON 362 IH

Whereas more than 79,000 members of the National Guard

and Reserves have been called to active duty in support

of the war against terrorism;

Whereas members of the National Guard and Reserves must

often make great economic sacrifices when they are called

to active duty;

Whereas the families of members of the National Guard and

Reserves must also make sacrifices when such members

are called to active duty, including living on a reduced income and coping with changes in medical and other benefits;

Whereas civilian employers of members of the National

Guard and Reserves play a vital role in ensuring that

such members have the opportunity to train and to defend freedom;

Whereas employers of members of the National Guard and

Reserves can make the lives of such members and such

members’ families more secure by paying such members

part or all of the amount, if any, by which the salary that

such members earned before being called to active duty

exceeds the salary that such members earn while serving

on active duty, and by continuing the medical and other

employment benefits of such members while they serve on

active duty; and

Whereas many employers in the public and private sectors

provide a pay differential benefit and an extension of employee benefits to employees who are members of the National Guard or Reserves and are called to active duty:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress—
3

•HCON 362 IH

1 (1) encourages employers who employ any

2 member of the National Guard or a Reserve compo3 nent of the Armed Forces to provide a pay differen4 tial benefit and an extension of employee benefits to

5 such member while such member serves on active

6 duty; and

7 (2) commends employers who already provide

8 such benefits.

Æ
**
Exhibit 15.3 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Shell Company Report on Form 20-F of our report datedSeptember 24, 2021 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Swvl Inc., appearing in the Registration Statement No. 333-259800 onForm F-4 of Pivotal Holdings Corp. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Statement by Experts” in such Shell Company Report. 

 
/s/ Grant Thornton Audit and Accounting Limited (Dubai Branch)Dubai, United Arab EmiratesMarch 31, 2022**
exv10w3



 




Exhibit 10.3



AMENDMENT TO:



CONSULTING AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) entered into as of April 1,2003 by and between Save the World
Air, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Pat Baker (“Consultant’). This Amendment
(“Amendment”) is in accordance with guidelines contained in Section 11. “Amendments; Consents” of
said “Agreement.”



Section 5. Term of said Agreement is herewith amended as follows:



This Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2006, unless earlier terminated in accordance with
this Section 5. In addition, this Agreement shall terminate automatically upon the death of
Consultant, or the mental or physical incapacity of Consultant for a period of 60 consecutive
days. Either party hereto may terminate this Agreement upon material breach of this Agreement by
the other party; and the Company may terminate this Agreement upon a material breach of the
Confidentiality Agreement by Consultant.



All other terms and condition of said Agreement, including those contained on: ANNEX
A-“CONSULTANT’S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES;” ANNEX B “CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT” and ANNEX
C-“ONSULTANT’S COMPENSATION” shall remain in full force and effect.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed or caused their respective duly authorized officer to
execute this Amendment as of April 1, 2005. The Amendment is to be attached and considered a part
of said Agreement.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CONSULTANT

	 
	 	By 	/s/ Pat Baker
	 
	 	Name:  Pat Baker 	 
	 	 	 
	 
	 	SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.

	 
	 	By 	/s/ Eugene E. Eichler
	 
	 	Name:  Eugene E. Eichler 	 
	 	Title:    President
H. Con. Res. 76 Agreed to May 22, 2001

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING USE OF EAST FRONT OF CAPITOL GROUNDS

FOR PERFORMANCES SPONSORED BY KENNEDY CENTER.

In carrying out its duties under section 4 of the John F. Kennedy Center Act (20 U.S.C. 76j), the John F. Kennedy Center

for the Performing Arts, in cooperation with the National Park

Service (in this resolution jointly referred to as the ‘‘sponsor’’),

may sponsor public performances on the East Front of the Capitol

Grounds at such dates and times as the Speaker of the House

of Representatives and Committee on Rules and Administration

of the Senate may approve jointly.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Any performance authorized under section

1 shall be free of admission charge to the public and arranged

not to interfere with the needs of Congress, under conditions to

be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police

Board.

(b) ASSUMPTION OF LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall assume full

responsibility for all liabilities incident to all activities associated

with the performance.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

(a) STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.—In consultation with the

Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Committee on

Rules and Administration of the Senate, the Architect of the Capitol

shall provide upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment as may

be required for a performance authorized under section 1.

(b) ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.—The Architect of the Capitol

and the Capitol Police Board may make such additional arrangements as may be required to carry out the performance.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the

restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946

(40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, advertisements,

displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other

restrictions applicable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to a

performance authorized by section 1.
H. Con. Res. 76—2

SEC. 5. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.

A performance may not be conducted under this resolution

after September 30, 2001.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-51028

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICARDO ARELLANO-CAMPOS, also known as 

Pedro Gonzalez-Hernandez, also known as

Ricardo Arellano-Rivera,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-00-CR-1123-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

February 15, 2001

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ricardo Arellano-Campos appeals his sentence following his

guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Arellano argues that his sentence

should not have exceeded the two-year maximum sentence under 8

U.S.C. § 1326(a). Arellano acknowledges that his argument is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224

(1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court

review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). 
No. 00-51028

- 2 -

Arellano’s argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres, 523

U.S. at 235. 

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is granted.

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ADRIANA SANTOS,

Appellant,

v.

CARLOS GARCIA,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00317-CV

Appeal from the

49th Judicial District Court

of Webb County, Texas

(TC# 2019-CVG-001704-D1)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant all costs of appeal for which let execution issue. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 14

- 009 10

- CR Jacob A DAME , Appellant

v. The /s The S TATE of Texas, Appellee From the 227th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014CR152 8 A Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr. , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: March 4, 2015
DISMISSED On January 7, 2015, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record within thirty days

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174, 175

- 76 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, order). Appellant did not file an amended certification. The clerk’s record does not contain a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal; to the contrary, the trial court certification in the record states “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has04

- 14

- 00910

- CR NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment

assesse d did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that defendant has no right of appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we di smiss the appeal. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2

-
# Bid Summary

# Capacity Utilization
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 8

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the current Federal income tax

deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second home

should not be further restricted.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mrs. ROUKEMA (for herself, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. FARR of

California, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr.

WHITFIELD, Mr. BENTSEN, Mr. BARRETT, and Mr. HORN) submitted

the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second home should not be further

restricted.

Whereas homeownership is a fundamental American ideal,

which promotes social and economic benefits beyond the

benefits that accrue to the occupant of the home;

Whereas homeownership is an important factor in promoting

economic security and stability for American families;

Whereas it is proper that the policy of the Federal Government is and should continue to be to encourage homeownership;
2

•HCON 8 IH

Whereas the national homeownership rate for the third quarter of the year 2000 was 67.5 percent;

Whereas the housing needs of the population will change as

the population ages;

Whereas the greatest growth sectors in homeownership are

minorities and first-time homebuyers;

Whereas the level of homeownership among foreign-born naturalized citizens who have been in the United States for

at least 6 years is the same as the level of homeownership of the nation as a whole (67 percent in 1998);

Whereas the value of a home represents a valuable source of

savings for a family;

Whereas the provisions related to homeownership are among

the simplest and most easily administered provisions of

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;

Whereas the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first home has been a valuable cornerstone of this Nation’s housing policy for most

of this century and may well be the most important component of housing-related tax policy in America today;

and

Whereas the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by second homes is of crucial

importance to the economies of many communities in

each of the 50 States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on
3

•HCON 8 IH

1 debt secured by a first or second home should not be fur2 ther restricted.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of PSB Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert G. Cocks, Jr.,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of thedates and for the periods covered by the report.

 

 
|   | /s/  Robert  G. Cocks, Jr.   |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert G. Cocks,  Jr.                  |
|   | President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER AMENDING RULES 501, 

514-516, 1001, 1002, AND 1005,

AND ADOPTING RULE 514.1 OF

THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF

CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING 

ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE MAGISTERIAL

DISTRICT JUDGES

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 446

MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19

th day of August, 2020, upon the recommendation of the Minor 

Court Rules Committee; the proposal having been published for public comment at 42 

Pa.B. 7525 (December 15, 2012), 44 Pa.B. 4342 (July 12, 2014), 47 Pa.B. 2324 (April 

22, 2017), and 47 Pa.B. 7676 (December 23, 2017): 

It is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania 

that Rules 501, 514-516, 1001, 1002, and 1005 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil 

Procedure Governing Actions and Proceedings before Magisterial District Judges are

amended in the attached form and Rule 514.1 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil 

Procedure Governing Actions and Proceedings before Magisterial District Judges is 

adopted in the attached form. The rule text incorporates the amendments of the Order of 

August 19, 2020, Magisterial District No. 445.

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall 

be effective on January 1, 2021.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
Rev 0 (9/08) 

Comments in Response to 

“Final rule; request for comments” 

Docket: FAA-2012-0848 Directorate Identifier 2012-NE-20-AD

Comments have been received in response to: “Final rule; request for comments,”

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above. 

(Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted. 

Once you have made your determination, please fill in the commenter(s) name(s) and check the 

appropriate response below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, 

if necessary. Then include your name and the date in the spaces provided, and return it to the 

AD directorate focal. 

The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we received from: 

Emirates Airlines, Rolls-Royce plc, The Boeing Company 

(Please check one)

 These comments have not been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration 

or change of this AD. 

 These comments have been found to contain information that warrants consideration of 

additional regulatory action. (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual 

FAA-IR-M-8040.1 FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.)

______Robert Green_____ 11/29/2012__ 

Name: Date: 

(This form is part of the official docket file for this AD action.)
F r

o m : " H i gg i n s, C o r t

n e y " < C o r t n e y

_ H i gg i n s @ o mb

. e o p
. g o v> T o : R o b er t

J W a y l a n d / R T P / U S E PA / U S @ E PA , D a v i d C oz z i e /R T P

/ U S E PA / U S @ E PA , G er

a i n Perr y / D C / U S E PA / U S @ E P A C c: B r i a n Sh r

a g er /R T P / U S E PA / U S @ E PA , T o n i J o n e s

/R T P / U S E PA / U S @ E PA , G e o r g e F a i so n /

D C / U S E PA / U S @ E PA , M

a r i a n a C u b e dd u /

D C / U S E PA / U S @ E PA D at e : 12/ 0 2/20 11 0 7 : 52 A M S u b j e c t : R e v i e w c o n c l u d e d f

o r 206 0 -A R13 , 206

0 -A R14 , 206

0 -A R15

H i a l l , W e h a v e c o ncl u d e d re v i ew of t h e B o i l er s M a j o r S o u r c e R e c o n s i d er at i o n , Bo i l er s Are a S o u r

c e R e c o n s i d er at i o n , a n d t h e C I S W I R e c o n s i d er at i o n
. P l e a s e l e t m e k n o

w i f y o u h a v e a n y

q u e s t i o n s
. R e g a r d s , C o r t n e y



### P a g e 1 o f 1
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lincoln Park Bancorp, (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), David G. Baker, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Nandini S. Mallya, Interim Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
in connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB, that she has reviewed
the Form 10-QSB and that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                           /s/ David G. Baker
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           David G. Baker
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Chief Executive Officer)


                                           /s/ Nandini S. Mallya
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Nandini S. Mallya
                                           Vice President and Treasurer
                                           (Interim Chief Financial Officer)

November 9, 2006
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Digital
Health Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Scott Wolf, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 29, 2022



| |                                     
| | ------------------------------------
| | /s/ Scott Wolf                      
| | Scott Wolf                          
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
| | (Principal executive officer)
August 20, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

TIQUISHIA QURENA CARROLL, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00178-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
[No. 12827-0-III.

Division Three.

June 11, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Rogelio M. Gonzalez, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grant County, No. 92-1-00128-7, Larry Larson, J., entered November 6, 1992. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Munson, J., concurred in by Schultheis, A.C.J., and Thompson, J.