alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Program Project Grant Review.                    

*Date:*                         April 25, 2012.                    

*Time:*                         3 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications and/or proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Eric H. Brown, MS, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Room 824, Msc 4872, (301) 594-4955,                         *browneri@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 28, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-8219 Filed 4-4-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 7 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 7

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp 
 should be issued in honor of the late George Thomas ``Mickey'' Leland.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp 
 should be issued in honor of the late George Thomas ``Mickey'' Leland.

Whereas George Thomas Leland (affectionately known as ``Mickey''), in the course 
        of his 6 terms as a member of the House of Representatives from the 
        State of Texas, emerged as a national spokesman regarding the problem of 
        hunger in the United States and throughout the world;
Whereas Mickey Leland was instrumental in establishing the Select Committee on 
        Hunger and served as chairman of that committee until the time of his 
        death;
Whereas, in the capacity of chairman of the Select Committee on Hunger, Mickey 
        Leland helped generate public awareness of the complex issues relating 
        to the alleviation of hunger and demonstrated strong personal moral 
        leadership;
Whereas it was his leadership that guided the Hunger Prevention Act of 1988, 
        which required the Secretary of Agriculture not only to distribute 
        surplus food, but also to purchase additional food for future 
        distributions to needy households;
Whereas Mickey Leland brought together entertainment personalities, religious 
        leaders, and private volunteer agencies to generate public support for 
        the African Famine Relief and Recovery Act of 1985, which provided 
        $800,000,000 in food and humanitarian relief supplies;
Whereas the various initiatives brought forth by Mickey Leland to eradicate 
        world hunger undoubtedly saved thousands of lives;
Whereas 1999 marked the 10th anniversary of Mickey Leland's death;
Whereas Mickey Leland died as he lived: on a mission to make a positive 
        difference in this world; and
Whereas commemorative postage stamps have been commissioned to honor other great 
        leaders in American history: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be issued in honor 
        of George Thomas ``Mickey'' Leland; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee of the United 
        States Postal Service should recommend to the Postmaster 
        General that such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
exv10w4



 




Exhibit 10.4



AMENDMENT TO:



CONSULTING AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) entered into as of April 1,2003 by and between Save the World
Air, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and John Kostic (“Consultant’). This Amendment
(“Amendment”) is in accordance with guidelines contained in Section 11. “Amendments; Consents” of
said “Agreement.”



Section 5. Term of said Agreement is herewith amended as follows:



This Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2006, unless earlier terminated in accordance with
this Section 5. In addition, this Agreement shall terminate automatically upon the death of
Consultant, or the mental or physical incapacity of Consultant for a period of 60 consecutive days.
Either party hereto may terminate this Agreement upon material breach of this Agreement by the
other party; and the Company may terminate this Agreement upon a material breach of the
Confidentiality Agreement by Consultant.



All other terms and condition of said Agreement, including those contained on: ANNEX
A-“CONSULTANT’S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES;” ANNEX B “CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT” and ANNEX
C-“ONSULTANT’S COMPENSATION” shall remain in full force and effect.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed or caused their respective duly authorized officer to
execute this Amendment as of April 1, 2005. The Amendment is to be attached and considered a part
of said Agreement.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CONSULTANT

	 
	 	By 	/s/ John Kostic
	 
	 	Name:  John Kostic 	 
	 	 	 
	 
	 	SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.

	 
	 	By 	/s/ Eugene E. Eichler
	 
	 	Name:  Eugene E. Eichler 	 
	 	Title:    President
ANNUAL CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

OF

SCP SERVICING, LLC

 

 

**BBCMS Mortgage Trust 2021-C11**

 

**Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series2021-C11**

 

 

I,Vartan Derbedrossian, the Chief Servicing Officer of SCP Servicing, LLC, a Delawarelimited liability company, as Special Servicer and a Reporting Person(hereinafter the “Reporting Person”), under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of September1, 2021, certify pursuant to Section 11.09 to the Certificate Administrator,the Trustee, and the Depositor (as those terms are defined in the Pooling andServicing Agreement) all of the following as of March 7, 2022:

 

(a)     that a review of the activities of theReporting Person during the period from 1/1/2021 to 12/31/2021 (the “ReportingPeriod”) and of its performance under this Pooling and Servicing Agreement hasbeen made under my supervision;

 

(b)    that, to the best of my knowledge, basedon such review, the Reporting Person has fulfilled all of its obligations underthe Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects during the periodfrom 1/1/2021 to 12/31/2021 (the “Reporting Period”)

 

(c)     that the Reporting Person has maintainedan effective internal control system over the servicing of mortgage loansincluding the Loans; and

 

(d)    that the Reporting Person has not receivedany notice regarding qualification, or challenge to the status of any TrustREMIC as a REMIC, from the IRS or any other governmental agency or body.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, this Certificate has been executed and is effective as ofMarch 7, 2022.

 

 

REPORTINGPERSON:

 

**SCPServicing LLC,**

aDelaware limited liability company

 

 

By:/s/ Vartan Derbedrossian 

Name:Vartan Derbedrossian

Title:Chief Servicing Officer
EXHIBIT 32


SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John C. Roman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Lee R. Schlesinger, Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of the date and for the period covered by the Report.








/s/ John C. Roman


John C. Roman


President and Chief Executive Officer


(principal executive officer)





/s/ Lee R. Schlesinger


Lee R. Schlesinger


Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


(principal financial officer)








Date: August 12, 2009
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Richard A. Szymanski, Appellant.

County Court, Niagara County,

April 2, 1959.

*William H. Earl*for appellant.

*Catherine B. Lautz, City Attorney,*for respondent.

Frank J. Kronenberg, J.

Defendant was convicted November 7, 1958, of a traffic infraction after a trial before Honorable Fred C. Root in the City Court of North Tonawanda.

He appeals on the ground that no information was made or filed against him. Due and timely objection was made in the trial court and no question of waiver is present.

Respondent’s contention, that the “uniform traffic ticket” or summons which was served upon defendant is a sufficient information, must fall before the Court of Appeals’ statement in *People*v. *Scott*(3 N Y 2d 148, 150) that such summons “ is not intended to fulfill the function of an information.”

Section 155 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law requires that for most purposes of procedure a traffic infraction be treated as a misdemeanor. *(People*v. *Wilson,*168 N. Y. S. 2d 391.) An information is required *(People*v. *Karnow,*204 Misc. 632), except when a fine is paid through a Traffic Violations Bureau pursuant to article 14-B of the General Municipal Law, or when an information is waived *(City of Buffalo*v. *Murphy,*228 App. Div. 279).

The conviction must be reversed and the matter remitted to the City Court.
Exhibit 21.01

SYMANTEC CORPORATION

SUBSIDIARIES



|                                |  |                                             
|------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary              |  | State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Symantec Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. |  | Singapore                                   
|Symantec (Australia) Pty Ltd.   |  | Australia                                   
|Symantec Holdings Ltd.          |  | Ireland                                     
|Symantec International          |  | Ireland                                     
|Symantec (Japan), Inc.          |  | Japan                                       
|Symantec Japan, LLC             |  | Japan                                       
|Symantec Limited                |  | Ireland                                     
|Symantec Operating Corporation  |  | Delaware                                    
|Symantec (UK) Limited           |  | United Kingdom                              
|VERITAS Software Corporation    |  | Delaware
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 66 (Thursday, April 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20635-20636]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8199]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or

[[Page 20636]]

the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of 
the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 30, 2012.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Leackco Banking Holding Company, Inc., Wolsey, South Dakota; to 
acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of ASB Bank Holding Company, 
and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of American State Bank of 
Pierre, both in Pierre, South Dakota.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Carlile Bancshares, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Northstar Financial Corporation, and 
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Northstar Bank of Texas, 
both in Denton, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 2, 2012.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012-8199 Filed 4-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00746-CV

Gene Doss Construction, Inc., Appellant

v.

Frank Smith’s, Inc. d/b/a The Deadfish Grill, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 146TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 245,047-B, HONORABLE RICK MORRIS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellee Frank Smith’s, Inc. has filed a petition for chapter 11 bankruptcy

(United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tex., Waco Division, Case Number 12-61194-cag).

Accordingly, this appeal is automatically stayed. See 11 U.S.C.A. § 362(a)(West Supp. 2012). Any

party may file a motion to reinstate upon the occurrence of an event that allows the case to proceed

or if any party believes the automatic stay does not apply to this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.3(a).

Failure to notify this Court of a lift in the automatic stay or termination of the bankruptcy case may

result in the dismissal of the cause for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

____________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Henson

Bankruptcy

Filed: December 28, 2012
Second Amendment to the Employment with Andrew J. Kohut



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO 
 EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of August 12, 2005, between Chesapeake Corporation, a Virginia corporation (the “Company”), and Andrew J. Kohut (the “Executive”). 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into an amended and
restated Executive Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated April 22, 2003, amended on January 3, 2005; and 
  
 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement, the Agreement may be amended by mutual consent of the Company and the Executive; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement;

  
 NOW THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended in the
following respects: 
  
 Section 1 (b) is amended to read as
follows: 
  
 (b) The period described in paragraph (a) shall be
extended for an additional twelve months unless the Company, before each November 1 of any year, provides written notice to the Executive that the period will not be extended. The preceding sentence shall first be effective to extend the period
described in paragraph (a) until December 31, 2008, unless written notice to the contrary is provided to the Executive by the Company before November 1, 2005. 
  

Except as provided above, the terms of the Agreement, dated April 22, 2003, and amended January 3, 2005 shall remain in effect. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Second Amendment to
Executive Employment Agreement to be duly executed on its behalf and the Executive has duly executed this Second Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement, all as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	EXECUTIVE	 	CHESAPEAKE CORPORATION
		
	 /s/ Andrew J. Kohut

	 	 /s/ J.P. Causey Jr.


	Andrew J. Kohut	 	J.P. Causey Jr.
	 	 	 Executive Vice President, Secretary &
 General
Counsel
#### William M. McWILLIAMS, d/b/a McWilliams Construction Company, Appellant, v. Basil S. BOLSTRIDGE, Elizabeth W. Bolstridge, and Royal L. Parker, Appellees.

No. 6269.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

May 7, 1982.

*241Joseph L. Kashi, Soldotna, for appellant.

Waller Taylor, III, Kenai, for appellees.

Before BURKE, C. J., and RABINOW-ITZ, CONNOR, MATTHEWS and COMPTON, JJ.

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

Appellant, William M. McWilliams contracted to buy a parcel of land from Appel-lees, Basil and Elizabeth Bolstridge and Royal L. Parker, Jr. After a time McWil-liams stopped making monthly payments, and appellees filed a quiet title action in order to foreclose the real estate contract. McWilliams, appearing pro se, answered and counterclaimed. Appellees moved for summary judgment, which was granted on both the quiet title action and the counterclaim.

On a summary judgment motion the moving party has the burden of showing that any defenses alleged are factually inapplicable. *Braund,*Inc. v. *White,*486 P.2d 50, 54 (Alaska 1971). The movant, in other words, must disprove the affirmative defenses and counterclaims of his opponent. *Id.*Although McWilliams’ counterclaim is not a model of clarity, when fairly construed it states a claim that Basil Bolstridge fraudulently induced McWilliams to enter into the contract by orally agreeing to repurchase the land at any time for the amount that McWilliams had by then paid, without intending to be bound by the agreement.1 In order to meet their initial burden of showing that the counterclaim was without merit, appellees had to negate it, as, for example, by filing an affidavit of Bolstridge that no such agreement was made. This they failed to do. The grant of summary judgment on the counterclaim was in error.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

1

. Good discussions of fraud claims of this nature are found in Sweet, Promissory Fraud and the Parole Evidence Rule, 49 Cal.L.Rev., 877 (1961); *Note,*The Legal Effect of Promises Made with Intent Not to Perform, 38 Coium.L. Rev. 1461 (1938).
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 I, William H. Koster, certify that: 

-  I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Neurogen Corporation; 

-  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

-  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

- The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

-  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

| Date: April 29, 2004 | By:   | /s/ William H. Koster      William H. Koster         President and        Chief Executive Officer |
|----------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

****