alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered November 10 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 22
- 00462
- CR
TREVOR RUSSELL , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 283rd Ju d icial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 21
- 75838
- T

O RDER Before the Court is app ellant ’ s November 8, 2022 motion to extend the time
to file his tendered brief. A review of the tendered brief reveals that on p age 31, in
a passage quoting from an indictment in a prior case read into the record by the prosecut ion, appellant reveals the full name of a child victim.
This Court does n ot allow a pa rty to fil e a br ief th at discloses the names of
victims or witnesses who were children at the time of the of fen ses , or t he n a me s of any other children discussed or i dentifi ed at trial

. Se e T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9. 10(b)– 2

–

(“Unless a c ourt o rders otherw ise, an elec tronic or p aper f iling w ith the court, including the contents of any appendice s, must not c onta in sensitive d at a .”), id.
9 .10 (a)(3) (“ Sensitive Data Defined. Sensiti ve data consists of

. . . a birth date , a h ome address, and t he nam e of a ny per son who was a minor at the ti me th e offense was committed.”). Accordingly, we STRIKE appel lant ’ s b rief

. We ORDE R appe llan t to file, w ith i n T HIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, a n amend ed bri ef that id entifi es all individuals who were children at the time
of this or any other off

e nse either generically (fo r example, “victim” ) or by init ials

on ly, in cludin g when quo ting re levan t por tions of the record or giving a st atement of th e ca se
. We DENY AS MOOT appellant ’ s motion to ex tend the time to file his
tendered brief.
/s/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE
Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 10.18 
  
 PNC Bank, National Association 
 One PNC Plaza 
 249 Fifth Avenue 
 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-2707 
  
 November 24, 2004 
  
 Worthington Receivables Corporation

 1205 Dearborn Drive 
 Columbus,
Ohio 43085 
 Attention: Randal I. Rombeiro 
  

	 	 Re:
	 Extension of Facility Termination Date 


  
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
  
 Reference is hereby made to that Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2000 (as amended, amended and restated, or
otherwise modified from time to time, the “Agreement”), among each of the undersigned hereto. Terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement. 
  
 As you have requested pursuant to Section 1.10 of the
Agreement, we hereby agree to extend the Facility Termination Date to November 23, 2005. Accordingly, clause (a) of the definition of “Facility Termination Date” as set forth in Exhibit I to the Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the
date “November 24, 2004” with the date “November 23, 2005” therein. 
  
 If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please execute the enclosed copies of this letter and return them to the undersigned. Your execution of this letter shall constitute your representation and
warranty that all necessary corporate action has been taken to extend the Facility Termination Date contemplated hereby. This letter may be executed in counterparts and shall be effective following our receipt of the fully executed counterpart
hereto and once the Seventh Amendment to the Market Street Funding Corporation Liquidity Asset Purchase Agreement and the Third Amendment to the Liberty Street Funding Corp. Liquidity Asset Purchase Agreement become effective. 
  
 (Continued on following page) 









 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this letter as of the date first written
above. 
  

			
	 MARKET STREET FUNDING CORPORATION

	   as a Purchaser

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Evelyn Echevarria

	 Name:
	 	 Evelyn Echevarria

	 Title:
	 	 Vice President



  

			
	 PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

	   as a Administrator and a Purchase Agent

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ John T. Smathers

	 Name:
	 	 John T. Smathers

	 Title:
	 	 Vice President



  

			
	 LIBERTY STREET FUNDING CORP.,

	   as a Purchaser

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Bernard J. Angelo

	 Name:
	 	 Bernard J. Angelo

	 Title:
	 	 Vice President



  

			
	 THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA,

	   as a Purchaser Agent

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Norman Las

	 Name:
	 	 Norman Las

	 Title:
	 	 Managing Director



  

			
	 FIFTH THIRD BANK,

	   as a Purchaser Agent and as a Purchaser

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Brian J. Gardner

	 Name:
	 	 Brian J. Gardner

	 Title:
	 	 AVP



  

			
	 ACKNOWLEDGED as of the date

	 first written above:

	
	 WORTHINGTON RECEIVABLES CORPORATION

	   as Seller

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Randal I. Rombeiro

	 Name:
	 	 Randal I. Rombeiro

	 Title:
	 	 Treasurer
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certification**

 

I, James A. Peers, certifythat:

 

1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of GFI Group Inc.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)              designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)              all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)             any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date:  May 16, 2005

 
| /s/ James A.  Peers                      |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
| James A.  Peers  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 435

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the therapeutic technique known

as rebirthing is a dangerous and harmful practice and should be prohibited.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 8, 2002

Mrs. MYRICK submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the therapeutic

technique known as rebirthing is a dangerous and harmful practice and should be prohibited.

Whereas ‘‘rebirthing’’ is a form of ‘‘attachment therapy’’,

which is used to try to forge new bonds between adoptive

parents and their adopted children;

Whereas Candace Newmaker, a child from North Carolina,

died from the rebirthing technique, and four other children have died from other forms of attachment therapy;

Whereas the American Psychological Association does not

recognize rebirthing as proper treatment; and

Whereas many States have enacted or are considering legislation to prohibit this technique: Now, therefore, be it
2

•HCON 435 IH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This concurrent resolution may be cited as the

5 ‘‘Candace Newmaker Resolution of 2002’’.

6 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING THERAPEUTIC

7 TECHNIQUE KNOWN AS REBIRTHING.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—It is the sense of the Congress

9 that the therapeutic technique known as rebirthing is dan10 gerous and harmful, and the Congress encourages each

11 State to enact a law that prohibits such technique.

12 (b) DEFINITION.—In this resolution, the term ‘‘re13 birthing’’ means a therapy to reenact the birthing process

14 in a manner that includes restraint and creates a situation

15 in which a patient may suffer physical injury or death.

Æ
#### The BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF the COUNTY OF CAMPBELL and the County of Campbell, State of Wyoming, Appellants (Defendants), v. Allen RIDENOUR, William Schaffner, James Lea and Ron Bourquin, Appellees (Plaintiffs). Allen RIDENOUR, William Schaffner, James Lea and Ron Bourquin, Appellants (Plaintiffs), v. The BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF the COUNTY OF CAMPBELL and the County of Campbell, State of Wyoming, Appellees (Defendants).

Nos. 5333, 5334.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

March 25, 1981.

McCLINTOCK, Justice.

My concurrence in the opinion of the court was unqualified. The only purpose of my special concurrence was to emphasize the importance of the Wisconsin law and interpretation thereof by that court.

THOMAS, Justice,

with whom ROSE, Chief Justice, joins.

I would grant the petitions for rehearing in this instance in which “there is a reasonable probability that the court may have arrived at an erroneous conclusion or overlooked some important question or matter necessary to a correct decision.” *Elmer v. State,*Wyo., 466 P.2d 375, 376 (1970).

In addition to the views expressed in the dissenting opinion, I would point out that the product of our decision is that the word “person,” as it appears in § l-l-109(a), W.S. 1977, emerges with a dual and inconsistent meaning. For substantive purposes it is clear that the court said it means “each defendant individually and separate and apart from any other defendant or any other person.” For procedural purposes, however, specifically in the submission of the case to the jury, the word “person” becomes plural in connotation and encompasses not only all defendants but all others who apparently contributed to the event causing the injury. This inconsistency is bound to lend confusion to the application of this statute.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Beauty Supply of
New Jersey Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carmine Catizone,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Carmine Catizone
-----------------------------
Carmine Catizone
Chief Executive Officer

November 19, 2008


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Beauty Supply of
New Jersey Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel Generelli,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Daniel Generelli
-----------------------------
Daniel Generelli
Chief Financial Officer

November 19, 2008
Unassociated Document


     Exhibit
      10.4

       

      Compensation
        Terms for Leighton J. Stephenson

       

       

      Title:
        Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance and
        Administrations

       

      Salary:
        $175,000/annually

       

      
        
          	Incentive Bonus: 	eligible to receive
                  a bonus as
                  established by the compensation committee of the board of
                  directors


        

      

       

      Relocation
        Expenses: Reimbursement up to $10,000.

       

      
        
          
            	
                    Stock
                      Options:

                  	
                    granted
                      ten year non-qualified options to purchase 65,000 shares of
                      the Company's
                      common stock at $7.00.  The options will vest at a rate
                      of 33-1/3%
                      commencing June 24, 2006.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Roebling Financial Corp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Frank J. Travea, III, Chief Executive Officer, and Janice A. Summers, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906            of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

 

 

 

| /s/ Frank J. Travea, III              |   | /s/ Janice A. Summers                                                      |
|---------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Frank J. Travea, III                  |   | Janice A. Summers                                                          |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   | Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                  |   |                                                                       |

 

| Date: | May 15, 2009 |
|-------|--------------|
[No. 36583-5-I.

Division One.

July 29, 1996.]

#### Allstate Insurance Company, *Respondent,*v. William T. Hartvig, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-2-09513-1, Jim Bates, J., entered April 4 and April 20, 1995. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Coleman, J., concurred in by Baker, C.J., and Ellington, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 514 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 514

 Concerning expedited security determinations relating to nonimmigrant 
visa requests for certain artists and entertainers from countries that 
             are state sponsors of international terrorism.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 24, 2002

 Ms. McCarthy of Missouri (for herself and Mr. Conyers) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Concerning expedited security determinations relating to nonimmigrant 
visa requests for certain artists and entertainers from countries that 
             are state sponsors of international terrorism.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) to the extent possible, in making determinations under 
        section 306 of the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry 
        Reform Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-173) with respect to the 
        application for a nonimmigrant visa of an artist or entertainer 
        seeking to enter the United States to attend a public awards 
        ceremony to recognize excellence in the arts where the alien 
        has been nominated or selected to receive an award, the 
        Secretary of State and the heads of other appropriate United 
        States agencies should expedite their determinations relating 
        to such applications to ensure the attendance of the applicant 
        if a visa is approved;
            (2) to the extent possible, the Secretary of State, the 
        Attorney General, the Director of Central Intelligence, and the 
        heads of other appropriate United States agencies should 
        coordinate their determinations to facilitate the issuance of 
        visas in the circumstances described in paragraph (1); and
            (3) in any expedited determination relating to the issuance 
        of visas in such circumstances, the national security interests 
        of the United States should continue to be of paramount 
        importance.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of SAFLINK Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Glenn L. Argenbright, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: April 29, 2004



/s/ GLENN L. ARGENBRIGHTGlenn L. Argenbright President and Chief Executive Officer
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2390 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Blue 234. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acid Blue 234. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACID BLUE 234. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2-Anthracenesulfonic acid, 1- 

amino-9, 10-dihydro-4-[[4- 

[[methyl[(4-methylphenyl) 

sulfony]amino]methyl]pheny] 

amino]-9, 10-dioxo-, sodium 

salt (1:1) (Acid blue 234) 

(CAS No. 72828–82–1) (provided for in subheading 

3204.12.45) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2390 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT





I, Barrett E. Green, Vice President and Treasurer of Entergy Texas, Inc. (the “Servicer”), certify that:





(a) A review of the Servicer's activities during the reporting period covered by this Report on Form 10-K and of its performance under that certain Transition Property Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of April 1, 2022  between Entergy Texas Restoration Funding II, LLC, as the Issuing Entity, and the Servicer (the “Servicing Agreement”) has been made under my supervision.





(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.





Date: March 24, 2023


By /s/ Barrett E. Green


Name:  Barrett E. Green


Title:  Vice President and Treasurer
SERVED: OCTOBER 13,2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIOlJrr^^ffiyi^^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS -^''rr nprR/^TlON^ 

WASHINGTON, DC •''"'' ^^^"^^"^"^ 

ZOiO o n !U A *^ 0 5 

IN THE MATTER OF 

DARBY AVIATION 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10SO0008 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2010-0627 

NOTICE OF PREHEARING CONFERENCE 

A Prehearing Telephone Conference is scheduled on October 28, 2010, at 3 p.m., Eastern 

Time. 

All parties should be prepared to discuss all issues and facts at issue. All documents that 

have been exchanged and that have not already been provided to the Judge should be furnished 

to him by October 22, 2010. 

Pursuant to Section 556 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 556(c)(8), each 

party shall be represented by someone who has authority to negotiate concerning resolution of all 

issues in controversy. 

SO ORDERED. 

Ronnie A. Yod^f 

Chief Administratis Lajv^dge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10SO0008 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

REVISED SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Deanna L. Weidner, Respondent's Counsel 

Anderson & Weidner, LLC 

1450 Financial Center 

505 20th Street North 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

TEL: 205-324-1230 

FAX: 205-322-3890 

Christopher R. Stevenson, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, ASO-7 

Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable Rormie A. Yoder, Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room El2-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000, 

Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

- 2 -