alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.48
​
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
SECURED NON-RECOURSE PROMISSORY NOTE
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECURED NON-RECOURSE PROMISSORY NOTE (this “Amendment”), dated as of May 18, 2022, is entered into by and among Mondee, Inc. (the “Lender”) and Mondee Group, LLC (the “Borrower”).
WHEREAS, Mondee Holdings, LLC (“Holdings”) extended a loan in the original principal amount of $19,282,363.27 to the Borrower, pursuant to that certain Secured Non-Recourse Promissory Note (the “Note”) issued as of March 25, 2016;
WHEREAS, the Note is secured by that certain Pledge and Security Agreement (the “PSA” and together with the Note, the “Loan Documents”) dated March 25, 2016 by and between Holdings and Borrower, pursuant to which the Borrower granted a security interest in 14,708 Class A Units of Holdings;
WHEREAS, effective as of March 25, 2016, the Loan Documents were assigned to Lender; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Note to allow for repayment in either cash or units of Holdings.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1.Amendment to Note.  The following new sentence is added immediately following the last sentence of Section 1 of the Note:
“The principal and interest owing hereunder may be repaid, at the election of the Borrower, in cash or units of Mondee Holdings LLC (“Holdings”), or any securities received in redemption of, as a distribution on or in exchange for the units of Holdings in connection with the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement, dated December 20, 2021, among Mondee Holdings II, Inc., Ithax Acquisition Corp., Ithax Merger Sub I, LLC and Ithax Merger Sub II, LLC, or a combination thereof.”
2.Continuing Force and Effect.  The Note, as amended by this Amendment, is hereby ratified and affirmed in all respects, and shall continue in full force and effect to the extent of and in accordance with its terms.
3.Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
​



​
4.Governing Law.  This Amendment and all actions arising out of or in connection with this Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to conflicts of law provisions of the State of California, or any other state.
[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]
​
​



​
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment to Secured Non-Recourse Promissory Note as of the date first written above.
​
	​


	​


	​



	​
	LENDER:

	​
	​
	​

	​
	MONDEE, INC.

	​
	​
	​

	​
	​
	​

	​
	By:
	/s/ Daniel Figenshu

	​
	Name:
	Daniel Figenshu

	​
	Title:
	Chief Financial Officer

	​
	​
	​

	​
	​
	​

	​
	BORROWER:

	​
	​
	​

	​
	MONDEE GROUP, LLC

	​
	​
	​

	​
	​
	​

	​
	By:
	/s/ Prasad Gundumogula

	​
	Name:
	Prasad Gundumogula

	​
	Title:
	Manager



​
​
​
​
​
[Signature Page to First Amendment to Secured Non-Recourse Promissory Note]
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 392

To protect private decisions about marriage.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 30, 2002

Mr. STARK submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To protect private decisions about marriage.

Whereas the decision to get married is a private decision between two adults in which no government interference is

warranted;

Whereas 79 percent of Americans believe the government

should not develop programs to encourage people to

marry or remain married, according to a study by the

Pew Research Center;

Whereas 66 percent of Americans who identify themselves as

strongly religious believe the government should not develop programs to encourage people to marry or remain

married, according to the same study by the Pew Research Center;

Whereas, according to a report by the Department of Justice

and the Department of Health and Human Services, 25
2

•HCON 392 IH

percent of women said they have been raped or physically

assaulted by their current or former spouse, cohabitating

partner, or date, so encouraging and coercing them or

their children back into these relationships may cause

them mental and physical harm;

Whereas research shows that as many as 60 percent of

women on welfare have suffered from domestic violence

as adults, so encouraging or coercing them back into

these relationships may cause them mental and physical

harm;

Whereas the Congress should seek to promote safe and stable

families as a part of the Temporary Assistance for Needy

Families (TANF) program reauthorization; and

Whereas no research exists to indicate that marriage promotion helps raise poor people out of poverty, while

ample evidence indicates that better health care, child

care, and job training services do help raise poor families

out of poverty: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that gov3 ernment not be used to influence, promote, or coerce indi4 viduals’ private decisions regarding marriage.

Æ
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 4

- 0 0 874

- C V

Style: In the Interest of R.R.H., M.D.J., and M.K., Children

Date motion filed * : April 22 , 201 5

Type of motion: Unopposed Motion to Amend Appellant’s Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant’s amended brief

Is appeal accelerated? Yes

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of prior extensions: Current Due date:

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: May 1, 2015

 T he Court will not grant ad ditional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

The motion is granted. Appellant’s amended brief is ordered filed by no later

than 5:00 p.m. on May 1, 2015. No extensions will be granted.

Judge's signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack

 for the Court

Panel consists of

____________________________________________ Date: A pril 27, 2015
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1      Section 906 Certification of CEO

                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vorsatech Ventures Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Thomas
Braun, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


BY:  /S/ Thomas Braun
     -------------------
Thomas Braun
President and CEO
January 31, 2005
From: Natalia Kreitzer

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang Subject: American Plating Data Request

Date: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 1:39:02 PM
Attachments: 2006-07-31 American Plating Room Air Exhaust.PDF American Plating-10Insp.doc 01-2354.doc 01-2354 TSD.doc

Cindy:

Attached is the most recent Permit, Support Document, Inspection Report and Source Test Report for American Plating (previously Specialty Stainless and Aluminum) located in Centralia

, Washington

. If
you need any additional information on this source, please contact me.



### Natalia Kreitzer Air Quality Engineer NOTE: We have installed a new phone system. My new phone extension is 114.

Southwest Clean Air Agency 11815 NE 99th St Suite 1294 Vancouver, WA 98682-2322 E: natalia @swcleanair.org P: (360) 574-3058 ext 114 F: (360) 576-0925

************************************************************************ PLEASE NOTE: SWCAA has applied a new spam filtering system to our email server. If you receive a rejection notice for emails sent to us, please contact us immediately at (360) 574- 3058 so we can resolve this from happening to any future emails.

************************************************************************
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-14-0060 SAT Date: 11/26/2013

Print Date: 1/8/2014
Related cases : Health related cases : Ecotox related cases: Analogs:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 1

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 1 1 PMN 3 1 1

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: UNCERT IRR-E,S,L UNCERT SENS-S,L Summary of Assessment : Fate : Fate Summary: P-14-0060 FATE: MW =

BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) =Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Sorption to soils/sediments = PBT Potential:
Health : Health Summary: Absorption of the low molecular weight fraction is poor all routes, based on physical/chemical properties. The PMN substance is expected to react slowly. There are uncertain concerns for eye, skin, and lung irritation as well as for dermal and respiratory sensitization, especially through chronic exposures, based on i
Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments
fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 * fish

_ chronic value * daphnid

_ chronic value * algal

_ chronic value * Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic polymers; SAR chemical class = p olyme r - nonionic - N CO; and with mp S = reacts with water at 20 C (P); ; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations ; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;
Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) *

SARs nonionic polymers SAR Class p olyme r -nonionic- N CO Ecotox Category N onionic Polymers
Ecotox Factors Comments: SAT Chair: J. Kwiat, 564-7653
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ DAWN HANSON, Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTEC TION BOARD , Respondent.

______________________

2014

- 3095

______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. CH

- 0752

- 14

- 0082 -I- 1.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________ Before O’M ALLEY , W ALLACH , and H UGHES , Circuit Judges

. O’M ALLEY , Circuit Judge

. O R D E R

T he Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) moves without opposition to remand th is case for a jurisdictional hearing

. In its dec ision , the Board dismissed Dawn Hanson’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction

, finding that Hanson failed to make non

- frivolous allegation s that her resignation was Case: 14-3095 Document: 25 Page: 1 Filed: 08/25/2014HANSON v. MSPB 2

involuntary. On appeal, the Board concedes that Hanson

ma d e the required non

- frivolous allegations, and that she i s entitled to a jurisdictional hearing before the Boar d.
Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion is granted. T his case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s30

ISSUED AS A MANDATE : August 25, 2014 Case: 14-3095 Document: 25 Page: 2 Filed: 08/25/2014
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-5148

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus DIIJON TIMMONS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CR-04-92) Submitted: May 26, 2006 Decided: June 7, 2006 Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Jonathan D. Byrne, Appellate Counsel, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Jean B. Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Diijon Timmons pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute in excess of 1.5 kilograms of cocaine base, 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000), and using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (2000). Timmons was sentenced to 235 months in prison for the drug offense and a consecutive 120-month term for the firearm offense, for an aggregate sentence of 355 months in prison. Timmons now appeals, challenging his sentence as unreasonable. We affirm. After United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), a district court is no longer bound by the sentencing range prescribed by the sentencing guidelines, which are now advisory. SeeUnited States v. Hughes , 401 F.3d 540, 546 (4th Cir. 2005). However, in determining a sentence post-Booker , sentencing courts are required to consider the correctly calculated guideline range and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp. 2005). Id. We will affirm a post-Bookersentence if it falls within the statutorily prescribed range and is reasonable. Id. at 546-47. A sentence that falls within the correctly determined guideline range is presumptively reasonable. United States v. Green , 436 F.3d 449, 457 (4th Cir. 2006), cert. denied , __ U.S. __, 2006 WL 1057741 (U.S. May 22, 2006) (No. 05-10474). Here, the district court sentenced Timmons within the statutorily prescribed ranges, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A) (2000);- 3 - 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(iii), and within the properly calculated guideline range. The court also took note of Timmons’ Position Statement Regarding Sentencing, in which Timmons’ attorney argued that a 240-month aggregate sentence would be appropriate in light of the sentencing factors set forth at § 3553(a). We therefore conclude that the sentence imposed is reasonable. We accordingly affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately set forth in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
----

| **CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR** |
|------------------------------------|

We consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Alpine Summit Energy Partners, Inc. being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission of our report dated August 13, 2021, relating to the consolidated statement of financial position of HB2 Origination, LLC as at December 31, 2020 and the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders’ equity (deficiency) and cash flows, and notes to the consolidated financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies, appearing in Exhibit 99.2, which is part of this Annual Report.

/s/RSM Alberta LLP

Chartered Professional Accountants

Calgary, Canada

April 26, 2022

----
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 67 (Friday, April 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8286]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Initial Review

    The meeting announced below concerns Detecting Emerging Vector-
Borne Zoonotic Pathogens in Indonesia, Funding Opportunity Announcement 
(FOA) CK12-002, initial review.
    Correction: The notice was published in the Federal Register on 
March 2, 2012, Volume 77, Number 42, Page 12844. The time and date 
should read as follows:
    Time and Date: 1 p.m.-3 p.m., April 16, 2012 (Closed).
    Contact Person for More Information: Gregory Anderson, M.P.H., 
M.S., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop 
E60, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone: (404) 718-8833.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: March 30, 2012.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012-8286 Filed 4-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASffiNGTON DC
) AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION OF ) AMERICA, INC. d/b/a AIRLINES FOR ) AMERICA, et al., ) ) Complainants, )

**~** 

### ) ) PORT OF PORTLAND, OREGON, ) ) Respondent. )

ORDER Docket No. 16-16-04

On March 3, 2016, counsel for Respondent, Port ofPortland, filed a Motion for an Extension ofTime under 14 C.F.R. § 16.19(e), requesting an 30 day extension oftime to file its Answer, orMotion, to the Complaintuntil Aprill5, 2016. Counsel advised that additional time is needed to investigate, gather evidence and prepare a comprehensive response to the Complaint, which was filed on February 10,2016. Counsel advised that the Complainant does not oppose an extension. Part 16 is intended to expedite substantiallythe handling and disposition ofairport-related complaints. See Rules ofPractice for Federally-Assisted Airports (Retrospective Regulatory Review) Final Rule, 78 Fed. Reg. 56135 (Sept. 12, 2013); Rules ofPractice for Federally-AssistedAirport Enforcement Proceedings Final Rule, 61 Fed. Reg. 53998 (Oct. 16, 1996). Parties may file a written motionfor an extension oftime. 14 C.F.R. § 16.19(e). The Directormay issue an order extending any time periodprescribed where necessary or appropriate for a fair and complete consideration ofmatters before the agency. 14 C.F.R § 16.ll(a). An extension oftime is reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, the Respondents' motionis hereby GRANTED. The Answer to the Complaint (or a motion to dismiss or motion for summaryjudgmentunder 14 CFR § 16.26) shall be due on Aprill5, 2016. The Complainant may file a Reply within ten days ofthe date ofservice ofthe

yron K. Huffman Acting Director, Office ofAirport

Compliance and Management AnalysisCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFYthat on April22, 2016, I have served a true copy ofthe foregoing ORDER on the following persons at the following addresses or email addresses: Counsel for Complainants: David Berg, Esq. Vice President & General Counsel Doug Mullen, Esq. Assistant General Counsel AirTransport Association ofAmerica, Inc. d/b/a Airlines for America 1275 PennsylvaniaAvenue, N.W. Suite 1300 Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 626-4234 Email: dbergialairlines.org; dmullenlalairlines.org Roy Goldberg, Esq. Steptoe & Johnson LLP 1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 429-8028 Email: rgoldberg(iil,steptoe.com Counsel for Respondents: Daniel Blaufus, Esq General Counsel Ian Whitlock, Esq. Deputy General Counsel Wendy Hain, Esq. Assistant General Counsel THE PORT OFPORTLAND 7200 NE Airport Way Portland, OR 97218 Email: dan.blaufus@portofportland.com; ian.whitlock@portofportland.com; wendy.hain@portofportland.com Phone: 503-415-6062 Pablo 0.Niiesch, Esq. SPIEGEL & McDIARMID LLP 1875 Eye Street, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20006 Email: pablo.nuesch@spiegelmcd.comPhone: 202-879-4000 Hand-Deliveredto: FAAPart 16 Airport Proceedings Docket (AGC-600) FAA Office ofAirport Compliance and ManagementAnalysis (AC0-100)

..



# ~l£~R4~/rc-{_/(/6~ Office ofAirport Compliance
[No. 18497-4-II.

Division Two.

June 28, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Jason Shawn Morlan, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clal-lam County, No. 94-1-00031-3, George L. Wood, J., entered August 5, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J, concurred in by Seinfeld, C.J., and Bridgewa-ter, J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

      ( print page 21113)    

# ACTION:

Notice of permit issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act  of 1978, Public Law 95-541.

# SUMMARY:

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. This is the required notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On March 21, 2012, the National Science Foundation published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     of a permit application received. The permit was issued on April 3, 2012 to: Lockheed Martin Corporation, Permit No. 2012-016, Ms. Celia Lang (Principal in Charge).                

Nadene G. Kennedy,

Permit Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-8389 Filed 4-6-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
[No. 14119-5-III.

Division Three.

June 20, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Gregory Maurice Spears, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court *for*Spokane County, No. 93-1-01816-0, James M. Murphy, J., entered June 20, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, J., concurred in by Sweeney, C.J., and Thompson, J.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**




**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Index Oil and Gas Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lyndon
      West, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Index Oil and Gas Inc. and will be retained by Index Oil and Gas Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





*/s/
                Lyndon West*
              Lyndon
                West
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              
              Date:
                November 14, 2007