alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). tk/R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T L E R O Y W I L L I S , J r ., P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. S T E V E R IT T E R , C hi ef M edi ca lO ff

i ce r; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 55640 D. C . No . 3 : 0 4 - c v - 0 2 3 0 3 - WQHJ MA ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea lfr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia W i l l i am Q . H ay e s , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 16, 2010 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , P R E G E R S O N , an dR A W L IN S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L er oy W i l l i s, Jr . , a C al i forni a s t at e pri soner, appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c o u rt’s s u m m aryju d g m e n t in h is 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n a lle g in g d e f e n d an ts 

# FI LED MA R 30 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALStk / Res ea r ch 08- 55640 2 v io la te dth e E ig h thA m e n d m e n t b ya c tin g w ith d e lib e r a te in d if f e r e n c e to h is m e di c a lne e ds . W e have j ur i s di c t i on pur s uantt o 28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de n o v o . Sa n c h ezv . V

ild , 8 9 1 F. 2 d2 4 0 , 2 4 1 - 4 2 ( 9 th Ci r . 1 9 8 9 ) . W e a f f i rm. T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyg r an te ds u m m aryju d g m e n t o n W illis ’s d e lib e r a te in d if f e r e n c e c la im b e c au s e th e r e w a s n o g e n u in e is s u e o f m a te r ia l f

a c t a s to w h e th e rtr e a tm e n t W illis r e c e iv e dw a s m e d ic a llyu n a c c e p tab le . Se e i d. a t242 ( r e c ogni z i ng tha tadi f

f e r e nc e of opi ni on aboutthe be s tc our s e of m e di c a ltr e a tm e nt do es no tam ou ntt o d el i berat e i nd i ff er ence ). W i l l i s’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. W i l l i s ’ s m ot i on r e que s t i ng as e tt l e m e ntc onf e r e nc e i s de ni e d. A F F I R M E D .
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-24-0000397

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

IN THE MATTER OF THE TAX APPEAL OF WESLEY PALMER-LASKY and JACQUELINE PALMER-LASKY, Appellants-Appellants, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, Appellee-Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE TAX APPEAL COURT (CASE NO. 1TX171001379)

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL (By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Guidry, JJ.) Upon consideration of the September 13, 2024 Stipulation and Dismissal of Appeal with Prejudice ( Stipulation ), filed by Appellee-Appellee City and County of Honolulu ( City), the papers in support, and the record, it appears that (1) the appeal has been docketed and the filing fees have been paid; (2) under Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure ( HRAP ) Rule 42(b), the parties stipulate to dismiss the appeal with prejudice, with each party to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs; (3) the Stipulation is dated and signed by both self-represented Appellants-Appellants, and by counsel for the City; and (4) dismissal is authorized by HRAP Rule 42(b).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is approved and the appeal is dismissed with prejudice, under HRAP Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-24-0000397 18-SEP-2024 07:54 AM Dkt. 49 OAWSTNOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Rule 42(b). The parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs on appeal.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, September 18, 2024. /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Acting Chief Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge /s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge

2
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 31

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the importance of organ,

tissue, bone marrow, and blood donation and supporting National Donor

Day.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 13, 2001

Mrs. THURMAN (for herself, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr.

KILDEE, Mr. SPRATT, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. KLECZKA, Ms. ESHOO, Mr.

BARRETT, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. MALONEY of Connecticut,

Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. HINCHEY, Ms. HOOLEY of Oregon,

Mr. MOAKLEY, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. SNYDER, Mr. TANNER, Mr. STARK, Mr.

HILLIARD, Mrs. NORTHUP, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. COYNE, Mr. MATSUI, Mr.

GIBBONS, Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. ROGERS of Michigan, Mr.

SESSIONS, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr.

UPTON, and Mr. PASCRELL) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the importance of organ, tissue, bone marrow, and blood donation

and supporting National Donor Day.

Whereas more than 70,000 individuals await organ transplants at any given moment;

Whereas another man, woman, or child is added to the national organ transplant waiting list every 20 minutes;
2

•HCON 31 IH

Whereas despite the progress in the last 15 years, more than

15 people per day die because of a shortage of donor organs;

Whereas almost everyone is a potential organ, tissue, and

blood donor;

Whereas transplantation has become an element of mainstream medicine that prolongs and enhances life;

Whereas for the fourth consecutive year, a coalition of health

organizations is joining forces for National Donor Day;

Whereas the first three National Donor Days raised a total

of nearly 25,000 units of blood, added over 4,000 potential donors to the National Marrow Donor Program Registry, and distributed tens of thousands of organ and tissue pledge cards;

Whereas National Donor Day is America’s largest one-day

organ, tissue, bone marrow, and blood donation event;

and

Whereas a number of businesses, foundations, health organizations, and the Department of Health and Human Services have designated February 10, 2001, as National

Donor Day: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) supports the goals and ideas of National

4 Donor Day;

5 (2) encourages all Americans to learn about the

6 importance of organ, tissue, bone marrow, and blood

7 donation and to discuss such donation with their

8 families and friends; and
3

•HCON 31 IH

1 (3) requests that the President issue a procla2 mation calling on the people of the United States to

3 conduct appropriate ceremonies, activities, and pro4 grams to demonstrate support for organ, tissue,

5 bone marrow, and blood donation.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 17 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 17

  Expressing the sense of the Congress supporting Federal funding of 
                    pluripotent stem cell research.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2001

 Mrs. Maloney of New York (for herself and Mrs. Morella) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress supporting Federal funding of 
                    pluripotent stem cell research.

Whereas Federal funds are crucial for researchers to proceed with stem cell 
        research and technologies;
Whereas pluripotent stem cell research does not undermine the current ban on 
        Federal funding of human embryo research because pluripotent stem cells 
        are not embryos and cannot become embryos;
Whereas pluripotent stem cells are presursors of specialized cells which are 
        destroyed or damaged in many incurable diseases and disabilities;
Whereas the ability to use pluripotent stem cells to generate specialized cells, 
        such as the dopamine-producing cells that are degenerated in Parkinson's 
        disease or the insulin-producing cells that are impaired in diabetes, 
        allows doctors to learn to generate the specialized cells that are 
        destroyed or damaged in other diseases and disabilities;
Whereas pluripotent stem cell research could lead to vastly improved treatments 
        or cures for Alzheimer's disease, anemia, AIDS, arthritis, blindness, 
        brain injury, birth defects, cancer, deafness, diabetes, heart disease, 
        kidney disease, liver disease, lung disease, Lou Gehrig's disease, 
        multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, Parkinson's disease, severe 
        burns, sickle cell anemia, spinal cord injury, and stroke, and could 
        also lead to improved success of organ transplantation; and
Whereas Federal funding through the National Institutes of Health ensures that 
        sensitive research will be conducted in accordance with the highest 
        scientific and ethical standards: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress supports Federal funding of pluripotent stem cell 
research.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONS     I, Scott J. Davido, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Calpine Generating Company, LLC andCalGen Finance Corp. (the “registrants”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrants’ other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrants, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants’ internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrants’ most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants’ internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrants’ other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants’ auditors and theaudit committee of the registrants’ board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrants’ ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrants’ internal control over financial reporting.Date:December 14, 2006   */s/ Scott J. Davido* Scott J. Davido  *President and Corporate Secretary*  
49
February 17, 2011

Mr. Patrick Au AirResources Board Stationary Source Division PO Box 2815 Sacramento, CA 95815

DearMr. Au: Enclosed is the Rule Action Package for amended Rule 202, Permit Exemptions that was amended effective immediately, bythe EKAPCD Board ofDirectors on January 13, 2011. The package is being sent electronicallyto EKAPCD requests that the Air Resources Board (ARB) forward all appropriate to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). EKAPCD also requests that ARB update their District Rule database ofRules and Regulations located on the ARB website at to include the amended version ofRule 202. Included in the Rule Action Package are the following attachments: 1) ARB Rule Evaluation Form 2) SIP Completion Checklist 3) Complete Clean Copy ofthe Rule 4) StrikeoutUnderline Copy ofthe Rule 5) Certified Governing Board Resolution 6) Certified Notice ofExemption to the Clerk 7) Evidence ofPublic Hearing 8) Public Comments and Responses 9) OtherMaterials (Final StaffReport, Certified Board Summary, Copy ofReferenced Rule 1 02, Definitions) Ifyou oryour staffhas any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact tne. Sincerely,

David L. Jones Air Pollution Control Officer DLJ: JC: dm Attachments
H. Con. Res. 339 Agreed to March 22, 2002

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas this Nation’s Founding Fathers mandated that a census

be conducted once every 10 years, and the decennial census

remains the only constitutionally mandated data collection

activity today;

Whereas the Congress established a permanent ‘‘Census Office’’

in the Department of the Interior on March 6, 1902, and, in

1903, transferred that office to what was then the newly established Department of Commerce and Labor (within which, with

more than 700 employees, it comprised the largest of that department’s new bureaus);

Whereas Federal, State, and local governments use data collected

by the Bureau of the Census in the distribution of funds and

in the formulation of public policy in such areas as education,

health and veterans’ services, nutrition, crime prevention, and

economic development, among others;

Whereas the Bureau of the Census supplies statistical data to

the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Bureau of Economic Analysis,

the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and

other Government agencies charged with measuring and reporting

on the health of the Nation’s economy;

Whereas the Bureau of the Census is the Nation’s largest data

collection agency, collecting data used by other Government agencies, tribal governments, institutions, universities, and nonprofit

organizations, and supplying information on poverty, unemployment, crime, education, marriage and family, and transportation;

Whereas, throughout its first 100 years, the Bureau of the Census

has earned a reputation for scrupulously safeguarding the confidentiality of respondents’ answers, a responsibility vital to

maintaining the public’s trust;

Whereas the Bureau of the Census, with the cooperation of other

Government agencies, the Congress, State and local governments,

and community organizations, and with significant technological

innovation and public outreach, has just conducted this Nation’s

22d decennial census in a timely and professional fashion,

employing over 500,000 dedicated Americans in the process; and

Whereas March 6, 2002, marks the 100th anniversary of the

establishment of the Bureau of the Census: Now, therefore, be

it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the Congress hereby—
H. Con. Res. 339—2

(1) recognizes the 100th anniversary of the establishment

of the Bureau of the Census; and

(2) acknowledges the achievements and contributions of

the Bureau of the Census, and of its current and former

employees, to the United States.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
IA

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 104

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to protect

the Pledge of Allegiance.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 27, 2002

Mr. LUCAS of Oklahoma introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to protect the Pledge of Allegiance.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

•HJ 104 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE —

2 ‘‘It is not an establishment of religion for teachers

3 in a public school to recite, or to lead willing students in

4 the recitation of, the following pledge: ‘I pledge allegiance

5 to the flag of the United States of America and to the

6 Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indi7 visible, with liberty and justice for all.’.’’.

Æ
Table 2. Feed Rate Data & Exhaust Data From Veolia's March 2010 Application Up

Unit #

Test Run 

#

Hg Feed Rate 

(lb/hr)

a

LVM Feed 

Rate 

(lb/hr)

SVM Feed 

Rate 

(lb/hr)

Stack 

flow 

(dscfm)

Oxygen (% 

dry)

Removal 

Efficiency 

(RE) for Hg 

(%)

RE 

1 0.0023 46.82 62.06 5496 11.72 65.61 92 0.0017 46.52 63.46 5572 11.54 51.65 93 0.0016 47.17 63.27 5357 11.3 50.06 9

Average 0.0017 46.84 62.93 5475 11.52 55.50 9

1 0.0016 47.71 64.07 5665 11.99 53.25 92 0.0022 47.31 65 5719 10.96 57.36 93 0.0018 48.01 63.78 5890 11.98 54.56 9

Average 0.0018 47.68 64.28 5758 11.64 54.47 9

1 0.0257 50.61 63.51 17280 12.27 94.05 92 0.026 50.65 63.45 17255 12.13 96.17 93 0.0264 49.79 64.01 17189 11.63 95.91 9

Average 0.0214 50.35 63.66 17241 12.01 95.30 9

Table 3. Estimated Stack Concentrations at Proposed OPLsUnit # Metal

Veolia’s 

3/2/10 

Proposed 

Extrapolated 

OPLs(lb/hr)

EPA’s 

Proposed 

OPLs 

(lb/hr)

Est. 

Stack 

Conc. @ 

Veolia's Proposed 

OPLs 

(μg/dscm 

@ 7% O2)

Est. 

Stack 

Conc. @ 

EPA's 

Proposed 

OPLs 

(μg/dscm 

@ 7% O2)

HWC MACT 

Limit (40 

C.F.R. § 

63.1219); μg/dscm @ 

7% O2 

Hg 0.0057 0.00165 183 53 130LVM 140 68.4687214 20 10 92SVM 189 90.9824796 65 31 230Hg 0.0057 0.0018 181 57 130LVM 143 77.8169429 70 38 92SVM 193 81.5946987 173 73 230Hg 0.078 0.0214 89 24 130LVM 151 77.2880386 30 15 92SVM 191 98.128117 81 42 230

234234
Table 4. Unit #2 Stack Parameters Measured in September 2008 

b

Test 

Run #

Stack 

flow 

(dscfm) % Oxygen (dry)

1 4698 11.212 5099 10.913 5248 11.35

Average 5015 11.16

a. Hg average feed rates & REs were calculated by EPA (Todd Ramaly, March 26, 2010).b. Used for LVM & SVM calculations. August 2008 data for Unit # 2 were used for Hg
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rand Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I Laurence S. Levy, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

       2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ Laurence S. Levy                                     Dated: May 16, 2005
  ------------------------------------------------------------
        Laurence S. Levy
        Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
```
#### Joseph P. EISENBERG, Petitioner, v. COLORADO INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Corona Drug Company, Inc., State Compensation Insurance Fund, Respondents.

No. 80CA0632.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.

Jan. 22, 1981.

Lutz & Berkowitz, Stephen N. Berkowitz, Denver, for petitioner.

J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Hennessey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Mary J. Mullarkey, Sol. Gen., Robert S. Hyatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for respondent Industrial Commission of Colorado.

Edward V. Frayle, William J. Baum, Denver, for respondent Corona Drug Co., Inc.

PIERCE, Judge.

Claimant Joseph P. Eisenberg seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Commission denying his claim for workmen’s compensation benefits. We set aside the order and remand the cause with directions.

The Commission’s denial of benefits was based on claimant’s failure to prove that his heart condition was proximately caused by unusual exertion arising out of and within the course of his employment under § 8-41-108(2.5), C.R.S.1973 (1979 Cum.Supp.). The Commission erred by applying the cited statutory provision as it is applicable only where the claimant has suffered a “heart attack.” The record discloses that claimant has never suffered a “heart attack.”

*362We set aside the order and remand the cause to the Industrial Commission to determine whether claimant’s heart condition is the result of an accident, injury, or occupational disease, as otherwise defined by § 8-41-108, C.R.S.1973 (1979 Cum.Supp.), which meets the conditions of § 8-52-102, C.R.S.1973 (1979 Cum.Supp.). This remand is without prejudice to the rights of the parties to raise again any issue properly presented after a final award of the Commission.

VAN CISE and KELLY, JJ., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00193-CV

IN RE 2400 WEST MARSHALL, LLC RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

TRIAL COURT NO. 096-271100-14

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and 

motion for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. 

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency 

relief are denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GARDNER, J.

DELIVERED: June 25, 2015

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).