alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00125

- CV

I ONE S TAVRON & S ERAFIM S TEVEN

S TAVRON

, Appellants

V

.

S URE T EC I NSURANCE C OMPANY

, Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the Probate Court

No. 1

of Tarrant County (2013

- PR00 606

- 1

- F)

December 12, 2019

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirme d.

It is further ordered that Ione Stavron and Serafim St even Stavron shall equally

split the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

Justice Wade Birdwell
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**717 CA 13-02187**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF LISA DIFRANCESCO, KELLY EARNST, BRENDA HIGGINS, MICHAEL JANOWSKY, MICHELLE MARASCHIELLO AND RAYMOND YUREK, PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS,

V ORDER

COUNTY OF NIAGARA, JAMES R. VOUTOUR, AS SHERIFF OF COUNTY OF NIAGARA, CITY OF NORTH TONAWANDA, NIAGARA COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF’S ASSOCIATION, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

JAECKLE FLEISCHMANN & MUGEL, LLP, BUFFALO (BEVERLEY S. BRAUN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS COUNTY OF NIAGARA AND JAMES R. VOUTOUR, AS SHERIFF OF COUNTY OF NIAGARA.

SHAWN P. NICKERSON, CITY ATTORNEY, NORTH TONAWANDA, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT CITY OF NORTH TONAWANDA.

LAW OFFICES OF W. JAMES SCHWAN, BUFFALO (W. JAMES SCHWAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT NIAGARA COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF’S ASSOCIATION.

REDEN & O’DONNELL, LLP, BUFFALO (TERRY M. SUGRUE OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeals from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Matthew J. Murphy, III, A.J.), entered February 28, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment granted the petition.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: June 13, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Abington Community Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jack J. Sandoski, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Company.



                                /s/ Jack J. Sandoski
                                --------------------------------------------
                                Jack J. Sandoski
                                Senior Vice President and
                                Chief Financial Officer
                                May 16, 2005





        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Abington Community Bancorp, Inc. and
will be retained by Abington Community Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




                                       39
**Exhibit 15.3**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by referenceon the form 20-F of Anghami , Inc. of our report dated April 15, 2021, except to Note 2A, as to which the date is May 24, 2021, and Note2B as to which the date is November 22, 2021, relating to the financial statements of Vistas Media Acquisition Company, Inc. for the periodfrom March 27, 2020 (date of inception) through December 31, 2020, and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts”in such Prospectus. 

 

/s/ Prager Metis CPA’s LLC

 

Hackensack, New Jersey

February 9, 2022
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-3684

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Wesley Warren Norris

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court

for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

 ____________

 Submitted: August 5, 2019

Filed: August 8, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SHEPHERD, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Wesley Norris directly appeals after he pled guilty to distributing child

pornography and the district court1

sentenced him to a prison term within the

1The Honorable Roseann A. Ketchmark, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri.
calculated United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual range. His counsel has

moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), raising as an issue whether the district court imposed a substantively

unreasonable prison term.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a

substantively unreasonable prison term. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455,

461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (reviewing sentence under deferential

abuse-of-discretion standard and discussing substantive reasonableness). In addition,

having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988),

we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion

to withdraw, and we affirm.

______________________________

-2-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This document provides notice of the availability of Application Packages for the 2013 Tax Counseling for the Elderly (TCE) Program.

# DATES:

                        Application Packages are available electronically from the IRS on May 1, 2012 by visiting: IRS.gov (key                               ( print page 20696)                            word search—“TCE”) or through Grants.gov. The deadline for submitting an application package to the IRS for the Tax Counseling for the Elderly (TCE) Program is May 31, 2012. All applications must be submitted through                         *Grants.gov.*

# ADDRESSES:

Internal Revenue Service, Grant Program Office, 5000 Ellin Road, NCFB C4-110, SE:W:CAR:SPEC:FO:GPO, Lanham, Maryland 20706.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Grant Program Office via their email address at                         *tce.grant.office@irs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Authority for the Tax Counseling for the Elderly (TCE) Program is contained in Section 163 of the Revenue Act of 1978, Public Law 95-600, (92 Stat. 12810), November 6, 1978. Regulations were published in the                     **Federal Register**                     at 44 FR 72113 on December 13, 1979. Section 163 gives the IRS authority to enter into cooperative agreements with private or public non-profit agencies or organizations to establish a network of trained volunteers to provide free tax information and return preparation assistance to elderly individuals. Elderly individuals are defined as individuals age 60 and over at the close of their taxable year. Because applications are being solicited before the FY 2013 budget has been approved, cooperative agreements will be entered into subject to the appropriation of funds.                

Dated: March 28, 2012.

Robin Taylor,

Chief, Grant Program Office, IRS, Stakeholder Partnerships, Education & Communication.

[FR Doc. 2012-8144 Filed 4-4-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 276 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 276

Expressing the sense of Congress that donations solicited by charitable 
  organizations for the victims of the terrorist attacks against the 
   United States that occurred on September 11, 2001, should be used 
              exclusively for the benefit of such victims.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2001

  Mrs. McCarthy of New York (for herself, Mr. Sanders, Mr. King, Mr. 
    Kennedy of Minnesota, and Mr. Matheson) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress that donations solicited by charitable 
  organizations for the victims of the terrorist attacks against the 
   United States that occurred on September 11, 2001, should be used 
              exclusively for the benefit of such victims.

Whereas approximately $1,100,000,000 has been donated to more than 200 
        charitable organizations since the terrorist attacks against the United 
        States that occurred on September 11, 2001;
Whereas only 10 percent of the money donated since September 11, 2001, has 
        reached the victims of the terrorist attacks;
Whereas the September 11th Fund, created by the United Way and the New York 
        Community Trust, collected $275,000,000 for the victims of the terrorist 
        attacks;
Whereas the Liberty Fund, created by the American Red Cross, collected 
        $505,000,000 for the victims of the terrorist attacks;
Whereas the Salvation Army collected more than $60,000,000 for the victims of 
        the terrorist attacks;
Whereas the Robin Hood Relief Fund, created by the Robin Hood Foundation, 
        collected $47,500,000 for the victims of the terrorist attacks; and
Whereas Helping.org, created by AOL-Time Warner, collected $10,300,000 for the 
        victims of the terrorist attacks: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that donations solicited by charitable 
organizations for the victims of the terrorist attacks against the 
United States that occurred on September 11, 2001, should be used 
exclusively for the benefit of such victims.
                                 <all>
```
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 22
- 00249
- CV

In re Patrick Earl Tarkington

OR I GINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the t ri al court's failure to rule on a pro se request filed on February 7, 20 22

. Although mandamus relief is generally available when the trial court has failed to rule on a p roperly filed request within a reasonable length of time, a delay of three months is no t unreasonable. See In re Whitfield , No. 03

- 18

- 00564

- CV, 2018 WL 4140735, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin Aug. 29, 2018, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

____________ ______________________________ Edward Smith , J us tice Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith Filed: May 12 , 2022
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

EVAN WARREN PRICE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Nos. 98-100 MM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of February, 2023, the Petition for Leave to File Petition 

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
**OFFICE OF**  **THE AlTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

### 719

**Honorable A.**  **a.** tr;tckerson - Page e



### proT0ke0your inquiry,Is that part or se0t10n4 reading am follous~

nPtwvided,bowevor, t&at in all mmtie0 beving a ppulstiQn of not less than fourteen tiaouoand, 

### a.TLra hundred and ruty (14,680) nOr plrffethal’ifoUrteen tbOl~sond, el@t huMriM ($4,~300), aooordtng 

### to the last available federal mnsus, as sam now axSets or way b6rosSter exist, ouch preohnct 4waradstil.oaer

shall be entitled to moeire In salary not ia ex.4368~ of Three Thousand Dollars ($3000&O) per annum.’ There is soms apparent sonSuslor in this pxym-kro, dth mapoat to the refer@neo to **the alast**  atallabls federal o4n8us .* If’ the tit in this proviso had used the language, 

### l ao~ording to the laot arrflable Sederal census as the em 

### new aidis,* 

### It doubtlsllr rwl4 hw8 

### embracedLiontgQmry Qoun~, far, as the last available federal Ooollus &x$&ad on the date of this enactment, 

### that fmtxnt~ did fall tit@n the braekot’ 14,660-l4*600 population. mat such is not the 1-e OS the Aot,for itooataios tho a&‘XtionaX wwda *or mat hereafter esi8tar 

### %a that, thosewomh?myhcmsoihr exidi~aa-0

pert~ntto 

### the194Oi~deraloqmsarhen the namebeoaPa 8railablet onii aOcOrd&~ to Wt - &ontgomeryCounty does mt fall witbin tba abowbraekei rri,th reapsot to wbA& population the @000.00 

### salw taa preeoribod.

**We ham**  **armstrued** 

### tidsAotwAthout8ny oonsideratioa Of its oon5titution8l raUdity.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350**








In
      connection with the quarterly  report on Form 10Q-SB of Rotoblock
      Corporation (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on the date hereof (the Report), I, Liu
      Chien-Chih, Principal Executive Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
      the
      annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Registrant.










Date:
      March 15,
      2008                                                                         
**R** **OTOBLOCK
      CORPORATION**,  Registrant





/s/  
      Liu
      Chien-Chih


By:
Liu
      Chien-Chih, President and Principal Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 439 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.439
                                         Agreed to July 24, 2002        

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
          the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

                          Concurrent Resolution

Whereas in 1977, Lindy Boggs helped found the Congressional Women's 
  Caucus and served as longtime Caucus Secretary;

Whereas the Congressional Women's Caucus is committed to improving the 
  lives of women and families through legislation and leadership roles;

Whereas the continued success of the Congressional Women's Caucus is 
  due to the bipartisan spirit that Lindy Boggs established;

Whereas Lindy Boggs represented the 2nd district of Louisiana from 
  March 20, 1973, to January 3, 1991;

Whereas Lindy Boggs was the first woman elected to the United States 
  House of Representatives from Louisiana and was the first woman to 
  chair a national political convention, leading the convention of 1976 
  that nominated former United States President Jimmy Carter;

Whereas Lindy Boggs served on the Committee on Appropriations, was 
  instrumental in creating the Select Committee on Children, Youth, and 
  Families, and chaired the Crisis Intervention Task Force; and

Whereas Lindy Boggs served as United States Ambassador to the Holy See 
  from December 16, 1997, to March 1, 2001: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress honors Corinne ``Lindy'' Claiborne Boggs for her 
extraordinary service to the people of Louisiana and the United States, 
recognizes that her role in founding the Congressional Women's Caucus 
has improved the lives of families throughout the United States, and 
commends her bipartisan spirit as an example to all elected officials.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
**Exhibit
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months period
      ended September 30, 2007 of the MACROshares Oil Up Holding Trust (the
      " **Registrant** "),
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      " **Quarterly**  **Report** "),
      I,
      John Flanagan, principal financial officer of MACRO Securities Depositor, LLC,
      which acts as the depositor for the Registrant (the " **Depositor** "),
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly represents,
                in all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
                of the
                Registrant.








Date:
      November 14, 2007


/s/
        John
        A.
        Flanagan
 John
        A.
        Flanagan
 On
        behalf
        of the Depositor
 and
        as
        Chief Financial Officer
p130203.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0203

Focus Ready Draft 1/31/2013

ENGINEER: Choudhary \ EV

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 1
p130203.eng

 

 

 

SAT (concerns) (01/18/2013):

Migration to groundwater: Slow

PBT rating: P2B1T1

Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 12 ppb),

XB Testing (No Testing desired)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 2
p130203.eng

 

 

 

Page 3
p130203.eng

 

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0203

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 4
p130203.eng

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0203

 

Page 5
p130203.eng

 

 

 

Page 6
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-2099

_____________________________

LAMETRIA FREEMAN,

Appellant,

v.

ANGIE GUILLORY CROCHET,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

William F. Stone, Judge.

August 13, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 

So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (noting that trial court decisions are 

presumed correct, appellant bears burden of demonstrating error, 

and absence of a transcript makes it impossible to show 

reversible error).

ROBERTS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Lametria Freeman, pro se, Appellant.

Angie Guillory Crochet, pro se, Appellee.
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit** ___________________________ No. 12-3030 ___________________________ United States of America, for the use and benefit of Triple S Alarm Co., Inc. lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Westfield Insurance Company lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock ____________ Submitted: April 9, 2013 Filed: April 12, 2013 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Triple S Alarm Co., Inc., appeals from the judgment of the District Court 1 denying its motion for attorney fees and a pe nalty under Arkansas law or attorney fees 1 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(b), in Triple S’s suit under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 3131. After car eful de novo review of the record, see United States v. Brummels , 15 F.3d 769, 771 (8th Cir. 1994), and having considered the parties’ submissions on appeal, we agree with the District Court that Triple S was not entitled to the relief that it sought for th e reasons explained in the court’s opinion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

-2-