T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OH AN DRAJ AT, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 71418 A ge nc yN o. A 096- 361- 909 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 10, 2013 ** B efo re: H A W K IN S , M cK E O W N , an dB E R Z O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J ohan D r a

j a t , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of I ndone s i a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i mmi g r a t i o n j u d g e ’ s ( “ I J ” ) d e c i s i o n d e n y i n g h i s ap p l i c a t i o n f o ra s y l u m, w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l, an dr e lie f

u n d e rth e C o n v e n tio n A g a in s t T o rtu r e ( “C A T ” ) .



# FI LED JU N 14 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 71418 2 W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence factu al fi n d i n g s, T

ekle v . Mukasey , 5 3 3 F . 3 d1 0 4 4 , 1 0 5 1 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 8 ) , a n dwe r e v ie w d e n o v o du e p r o c e s s c la im s , V a s q u ez - Za v a la v . A s h c r o ft , 324 F . 3d 1105, 1 1 0 7 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 3 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. S ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the a ge nc y ’ s a dve r s e c r e di bi l i tyde t e rm i na t i on ba s e d on i nc ons i s t e nc i e s w i thi n D r a j a t ’ s t e s t i m onya nd be tw e e n hi s t e s t i m onyand de c l ar a t i on r e gar di ng hi s r e portt o the pol i c e of the a tt e m pt e d poi s oni ng, i nc l udi ng w h e th e ran yr e p o rt w a s m a d e a t a ll. See Koh l iv. G on zales , 473 F . 3d 1061, 1071 ( 9th C i r . 2007) ( di s c r e panc i e s be tw e e n t e s t i m onya nd de c l ar a t i on s upport e d the a d v e r s e c r e d ib ilityd e te rm in a tio n ) ; R i ve ra v. Mukasey , 5 0 8 F .3 d1 2 7 1 , 1 2 7 5 ( 9 th C i r . 2007) ( i nc ons i s t e nc i e s r e gar di ng de t a i l s of i nc i de nttha tw e ntt o the he artof th e c la im d e p r iv e dth e c la im o f “th e r in g o f

tru th .” ) . I n th e ab s e n c e o f c r e d ib le te s tim o n y , D r a

ja t’s a s y lu m a n dw ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l c la im s f

a il. See Farah v. A s h c r o ft , 3 4 8 F .3 d1 1 5 3 , 1 1 5 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . B ec ause D ra

j at ’ s C A T cl ai m i s bas ed on the sam e t es t i m on y the agency f o u n dn o t c r e d ib le , an dh e p o in ts to n o o th e re v id e n c e s h o w in g it is m o r e lik e ly th an n o t h e w ill b e to rtu r e dif r e tu rn e dto I n d o n e s ia , h is C A T c la im a ls o f a ils . See i d. a t 1 1 5 6 - 5 7 .11- 71418 3 F i na l l y , the B I A di d note rri n c onc l udi ng tha tthe I J ’ s us e of atr ans c r i ptof th e e ar lie rh e ar in g s d idn o t v io la te D r a ja t’s du e p r o c e s s r ig h ts . Se e La ta v . I NS , 2 0 4 F .3 d1 2 4 1 , 1 2 4 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) ( p e titio n e rm u s t s h o w e rr o ra n dp r e ju d ic e to es t abl i sh a due process vi ol at i on ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.