Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2012 / Notices 19619 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 

Requests for Revocations in Part and Deferral of 

Administrative Reviews, 76 FR 45227 (July 28, 

2011). 

2See Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From the 

People’s Republic of China: Extension of 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 77 FR 6783 (February 9, 

2012). 

factual submissions in any proceeding 

segments initiated on or after March 14, 

2011, if the submitting party does not 

comply with the revised certification 

requirements. 

These initiations and this notice are 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i) and 

(f)(2)(i). 

Dated: March 28, 2012. 

Gary Taverman, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7874 Filed 3–30–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–821–809] 

Notice of Extension of Time Limit for 

the Preliminary Results of 

Administrative Review of the 

Suspension Agreement on Hot-Rolled 

Flat-Rolled Carbon-Quality Steel 

Products from the Russian Federation 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of Extension of Time 

Limit for the Preliminary Results of 

Administrative Review of the 

Suspension Agreement on Hot-Rolled 

Flat-Rolled Carbon-Quality Steel 

Products from the Russian Federation. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is extending the time 

limit for the preliminary results of the 

administrative review of the Agreement 

Suspending the Antidumping 

Investigation on Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled 

Carbon-Quality Steel Products from the 

Russian Federation (the Agreement). 

DATES: Effective Date: April 2, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sally C. Gannon or Anne D’Alauro, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–0162 or 

(202) 482–4830. Extension of 

Preliminary Results: The Department 

published its notice of initiation of this 

review in the Federal Register on 

August 26, 2011. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Requests 

for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 53404 

(August 26, 2011). Pursuant to the time 

limits for administrative reviews set 

forth in section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Tariff Act), 

the current deadlines are April 2, 2012, 

for the preliminary results and July 31, 

2012, for the final results. Section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act provides 

that, if it is not practicable to complete 

the review within these time limits, the 

Department may extend the time limit 

for completion of the preliminary 

results by 120 days. 

The Department finds that it is not 

practicable to complete the preliminary 

results by April 2, 2012. In this 

administrative review, in accordance 

with section 751(a)(1)(C) of the Tariff 

Act, the Department is reviewing both 

the status of, and compliance with, the 

Agreement. Because domestic interested 

parties have raised the complex issue of 

whether the Agreement is fulfilling its 

statutory requirement to prevent price 

undercutting and suppression of 

domestic hot-rolled steel prices, the 

Department needs additional time to 

complete its preliminary analysis in this 

administrative review of the Agreement. 

The Department must carefully consider 

the information submitted by the 

respondent and domestic interested 

parties in this review and must address 

the issues raised in the context of this 

administrative review. Therefore, the 

Department is extending the time limit 

for completing the preliminary results of 

the review until May 24, 2012. The 

deadline for the final results of this 

review will continue to be 120 days 

after publication of the preliminary 

results. 

This extension is published in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Tariff Act. 

Dated: March 27, 2012. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7861 Filed 3–30–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–905] 

Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from the 

People’s Republic of China: Extension 

of Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) is extending the time 

limit for the preliminary results of the 

administrative review of certain 

polyester staple fiber from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). This review 

covers the period June 1, 2010, through 

May 31, 2011. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 2, 2012 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Steven Hampton, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 9, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–0116. 

Background 

On July 28, 2011, the Department 

published a notice of initiation of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

polyester staple fiber from the PRC.1 On 

February 9, 2012 the Department 

partially extended the deadline for the 

preliminary results of this review to 

April 2, 2012.2

Statutory Time Limits 

In antidumping duty administrative 

reviews, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’), requires the Department to make 

a preliminary determination within 245 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month of an order for which a review 

is requested and a final determination 

within 120 days after the date on which 

the preliminary results are published. 

However, if it is not practicable to 

complete the review within these time 

periods, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 

allows the Department to extend the 

time limit for the preliminary 

determination to a maximum of 365 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month. 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of Review 

We determine that it is not practicable 

to complete the preliminary results of 

this administrative review within the 

original time limit because the 

Department requires additional time to 

analyze questionnaire responses and 

evaluate surrogate value submissions for 

purposes of the preliminary results. 

Therefore, the Department is fully 

extending the time limit for completion 

of the preliminary results of this 

administrative review by 90 days. The 

preliminary results will now be due no 

later than June 29, 2012. The final 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

19620 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2012 / Notices 

1See Notice of Amendment of Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Preserved 

Mushrooms From the People’s Republic of China, 

64 FR 8308 (February 19, 1999). 

2See, generally, Wooden Bedroom Furniture from 

the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews, 75 FR 

72794, 72796 (November 26, 2010), unchanged in 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty New Shipper Reviews, 76 FR 9747 (February 

22, 2011). 

3See Certain Preserved Mushrooms from the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of Initiation of 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews, 75 FR 

62108, 62108 (October 7, 2010). 

results continue to be due 120 days after 

the publication of the preliminary 

results. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: March 26, 2012. 

Gary Taverman, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7849 Filed 3–30–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–851] 

Certain Preserved Mushrooms from 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Initiation of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) has received a request 

for a new shipper review (NSR) of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

preserved mushrooms from the People’s 

Republic of China (PRC). In accordance 

with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 

19 CFR 351.214(d), we are initiating an 

antidumping duty NSR of Shandong 

Yinfeng Rare Fungus Co., Ltd. (Yinfeng). 

The period of review (POR) of this NSR 

is February 1, 2011, through January 31, 

2012. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 2, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mark Flessner or Robert James, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, 

telephone: (202) 482–6312 or (202) 482– 

0649, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 19, 1999, the Department 

published the antidumping duty order 

on certain preserved mushrooms from 

the PRC.1 The antidumping duty order 

on certain preserved mushrooms from 

the PRC therefore has a February 

anniversary month. On February 29, 

2012, Yinfeng timely filed a request for 

an NSR. See Letter from Shanghai Yuet 

Fai Commercial Consulting Co., Ltd., to 

Secretary of Commerce dated February 

29, 2012 (Yingfeng NSR Request). In its 

request for review, Yinfeng identified 

itself as both exporter and producer of 

the subject merchandise. Id., at 1. 

Pursuant to the requirements set forth 

in section 751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Act and 

19 CFR 351.214(b)(2), Yinfeng certified 

that: (1) It did not export subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the period of investigation (POI) (see 

section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the Act and 

19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(i)); (2) since the 

initiation of the investigation it has 

never been affiliated with any company 

that exported subject merchandise to the 

United States during the POI, including 

those companies not individually 

examined during the investigation (see 

section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Act 

and19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A)); and (3) 

its export activities were not controlled 

by the central government of the PRC 

(see 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B)). See 

Yingfeng NSR Request at 2–3 and 

Exhibits 2 and 4. Additionally, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.214(b)(2)(iv), Yinfeng submitted 

documentation establishing the 

following: (1) The date on which it first 

shipped subject merchandise to the 

United States; (2) the volume of its first 

shipment; and (3) the date of its first 

sale to an unaffiliated customers in the 

United States. Id., at 2 and Exhibit 1. 

Initiation of Review 

Based on information on the record, 

and in accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(d), we find the request Yinfeng 

submitted meets the statutory and 

regulatory requirements for initiation of 

an NSR. See Memorandum from Mark 

Flessner to the File through Richard 

Weible entitled, ‘‘Initiation of AD New 

Shipper Review: Certain Preserved 

Mushrooms from the People’s Republic 

of China (A–570–851),’’ dated March 28, 

2012. Accordingly, we are initiating an 

NSR of the antidumping duty order on 

certain preserved mushrooms from the 

PRC produced and exported by Yinfeng. 

This review covers the period February 

1, 2011, through January 31, 2012. We 

intend to issue the preliminary results 

of this review no later than 180 days 

after the date on which this review is 

initiated, and the final results within 90 

days after the date on which we issue 

the preliminary results. See section 

751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(h)(i). 

In cases involving non-market 

economies, the Department requires that 

a company seeking to establish 

eligibility for an antidumping duty rate 

separate from the country-wide rate 

provide evidence of de jure and de facto 

absence of government control over the 

company’s export activities.2

Accordingly, we will issue a 

questionnaire to Yinfeng that will 

include a separate rates section. This 

review will proceed if the response 

provides sufficient indication that 

Yinfeng is not subject to either de jure 

or de facto government control with 

respect to its exports of preserved 

mushrooms. However, if Yinfeng does 

not demonstrate eligibility for a separate 

rate, it will be deemed not to have met 

the requirements of section 

751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(2)(b)(i) and therefore not 

separate from the PRC-wide entity; we 

will rescind the NSR accordingly.3

Upon initiation, we shall direct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

suspend liquidation of any unliquidated 

entries of subject merchandise produced 

and exported by Yinfeng. We shall 

instruct CBP to allow (at the option of 

the importer) the posting, until the 

completion of the review, of a bond or 

security in lieu of a cash deposit for 

certain entries of the subject 

merchandise produced and exported by 

Yinfeng in accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(e). Because Yinfeng certified 

that it both produced and exported the 

subject merchandise, the sales of which 

form the basis for its NSR request, we 

shall instruct CBP to permit the use of 

a bond only for entries of subject 

merchandise where Yinfeng acted both 

as producer and exporter. 

To assist in its analysis of the bona 

fides of Yinfeng’s sales, upon initiation 

of this NSR, the Department will require 

Yinfeng to submit on an ongoing basis 

complete transaction information 

concerning any sales of subject 

merchandise to the United States that 

were made subsequent to the POR. 

Interested parties requiring access to 

business proprietary information in this 

NSR should submit applications for 

disclosure under administrative 

protective order in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.305 and 351.306. 

This notice serves as a reminder that 

any party submitting factual information 

in an AD/CVD proceeding must certify 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES