alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 68 (Monday, April 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8435]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Update to Notice of Financial Institutions for Which the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation Has Been Appointed Either Receiver, 
Liquidator, or Manager

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the 
following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as 
indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in 
the Federal Register) may be relied upon as ``of record'' notice that 
the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the 
statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the Federal 
Register (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the 
identification of any institutions which have been placed in 
liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html or contact the Manager of 
Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center.

    Dated: April 2, 2012.

    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Pamela Johnson,
Regulatory Editing Specialist.

                                           Institutions in Liquidation
                                             [In alphabetical order]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          FDIC Ref. No.                  Bank name               City                  State         Date closed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10432............................  Fidelity Bank.......  Dearborn............  MI..................    3/30/2012
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2012-8435 Filed 4-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**




**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Blackhawk Capital Group
      BDC, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Craig
      A.
      Zabala, as acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereto certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date:  May
      12,
      2006








/s/
      Craig A. Zabala


Craig
      A.
      Zabala


Acting
      Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Blackhawk Capital Group BDC Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered January 14, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00813-CV

EDWARD KELLY, EDWARD KELLY D/B/A KELLY PLUMBING & LEAK 

DETECTION AND BRITTANY KELLY, Appellants

V.

SANJAI R. ISAAC, M.D., REBECCA ISAAC AND MERIDIAN REVOCABLE TRUST, 

BARBARA HEIDEN AND SHELLEY OLIVER AND BLAKE MYERS, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 007-01284-2017

ORDER

Before the Court is appellees’ January 10, 2020 second unopposed motion to extend time 

to file their brief. Appellees seek an extension of fifteen days. We GRANT the motion and 

ORDER the brief be filed no later than January 27, 2020.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
Grain Inspection 

Advisory Committee 

Meeting May12-13

2021 Zoom Meeting

Recommendation to 

the United States 

Secretary of 

Agriculture 

Committee Members present May 12th: David Ayers, Randall Burns, Janice Cooper,

Curtis Engel, Nicholas Friant, Matthew Kerrigan, Ryan Kuhl, John Lindgren, Robert Sinner,

Brent Turnipseed, Mark Watne, Jimmy Williams.

Committee Members present May 13th: David Ayers, Randall Burns, Janice Cooper,

Curtis Engel, Nicholas Friant, Matthew Kerrigan, Ryan Kuhl, John Lindgren, Robert Sinner,

Brent Turnipseed, Mark Watne.
Topic: FGIS FDA MOU Discussion

1. Establish a GIAC subcommittee to review FDA-actionable items 

for which a pre-approved reconditioning plan can be developed. 

Furthermore, the subcommittee should also propose what 

actions/activities would be required under the pre-approved 

reconditioning/remediation plan. The subcommittee will work in 

conjunction with FGIS staff and report findings and 

recommendations at the next meeting of the GIAC.

Motion made by Nick Friant 

Second by David Ayers 

Vote:

Yea: unanimous (11)

Nay: (0)

GIAC Chair: Matthew Kerrigan
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRESIDENT**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Blackhawk Capital Group
      BDC, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Craig
      A. Zabala, as President of the Company, hereto certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  November
      10, 2006




/s/
              Craig A.
              ZabalaCraig
                    A. Zabala
                  President
                  (Principal
                    Executive Officer)







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Blackhawk Capital Group BDC Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control

5600 Sand Lake Road Orlando, Florida 32819-8907

Exemption Letter for § 91.203: Civil Aircraft, Certifications Required

06/23/2015

Renewal Ref: Exemption No. 10326A

Regulatory Document # FAA-2011-0741

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

West Building ground floor,

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control (LMMFC) operate various Unmanned Aircraft 

Systems (UAS) in the United States for missions related to research and development, crew 

training and market surveys. This new technology developed for the Department of Defense, 

and commercial agencies will contribute to overall public safety. These operations support 

military and homeland defense, border protection, law enforcement and local disaster relief. 

LMMFC operations shall meet or exceed equivalent levels of safety by use of proven 

engineering processes and superb quality control.

Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control (LMMFC) operate various Unmanned Aircraft 

Systems (UAS) in the United States for missions related to research and development, crew 

training and market surveys. This new technology developed for the Department of Defense, 

and other public agencies will contribute to overall public safety. These operations support 

military and public agencies, homeland defense, border protection, law enforcement and local 

disaster relief. LMMFC operations shall meet or exceed equivalent levels of safety by use of 

proven engineering processes and superb quality control.

LMMFC requests an exemption from 14 CFR 91.203 to carry and display the certification and 

registration documents onboard the UA. Carrying the airworthiness certificate and aircraft 

registration in the UA is not practical since there is no pilot onboard the aircraft. An equivalent 

level of safety will be maintained by keeping these documents in or near the Ground Control 

Station where it will be available to the pilot and crew at all times.

Please contact me if you require additional information:

6/24/2015

X Jacob A. Senior

Jacob Senior

Orlando Aviation Consultants (OAC)

Signed by: Jacob Senior (affiliate)
CASE NO. 12-14-00298-CR

ROBERT EUGENE PRITCHETT § COURT OF APPEALS

VS. § STATE OF TEXAS

STATE OF TEXAS § TWELFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPELLANT’S REPLY BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes Robert Eugene Pritchett, Appellant, in the above styled and numbered cause, 

by and through his attorney of record, Donovan Paul Dudinsky, and files this Motion For Leave to

File Appellant’s Reply Brief pursuant to Rule 38.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Appellant respectfully requests accorded time for response period of time from the filing of

the order by the esteemed Court.

Appellant prays that relief requested be granted.

 /s/donovan paul dudinsky

_______________________________

 DONOVAN PAUL DUDINSKY

 701 South Liberty Street

 San Augustine, Texas 75972

 Tel. 936-275-9871

 Fax. 936-275-9655

 TSBN: 24038869

 Attorney for Appellant

 Robert Eugene Pritchett

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on the 5th day of February, 2015 a true and correct copy of the

aforementioned Motion For Leave to File Appellant’s Reply Brief was delivered by facsimile

service on the District Attorney, J. Kevin Dutton, San Augustine County, Texas.

/s/ donovan paul dudinsky

 DONOVAN PAUL DUDINSKY

ACCEPTED

12-14-00298-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

2/4/2015 1:55:52 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 2/4/2015 1:55:52 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
CASE NO. 12-14-00298-CR

ROBERT EUGENE PRITCHETT § COURT OF APPEALS

VS. § STATE OF TEXAS

STATE OFTEXAS § TWELFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPELLANT’S REPLY BRIEF

CAME ON TO BE CONSIDERED Appellant’s Motion for Leave To File Appellant’s

Reply Brief.

The Twelfth Court of Appeal hereby Grants ______counsel’s Motion For Leave To File

Appellant’s Reply Brief.

THEREFORE SO ORDERED. Appellant’s Reply Brief is due on the ____ day of

____________, 2015.

Signed on this _____ day of February, 2015.

______________________________

 PRESIDING JUDGE

 TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 88

Relative to the death of the Honorable Roman L. Hruska, formerly a Senator

from the State of Nebraska.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 28, 1999

Mr. HAGEL (for himself and Mr. KERREY) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Relative to the death of the Honorable Roman L. Hruska,

formerly a Senator from the State of Nebraska.

1 Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound

2 sorrow and deep regret the announcement of the death

3 of the Honorable Roman L. Hruska, formerly a Senator

4 from the State of Nebraska.

5 Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate commu6 nicate these resolutions to the House of Representatives

7 and transmit an enrolled copy thereof to the family of the

8 deceased.
2

SRES 88 ATS

1 Resolved, That when the Senate adjourns today, it

2 stand adjourned as a further mark of respect to the mem3 ory of the deceased Senator.

Æ
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA Y 13, 2016

NO. 03

- 14

- 00406

- CV

Gary Phillips, Appellant

v.

Boo 2 You, LLC; George Steven Smith; and Linda K. Smith, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMS ON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BO URLAND, AND SHANNON *

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SHANNON

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on May 29, 2014. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the trial

court’s order . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s order

. The appellant s hall pay all

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.

* Before Bob E. Shannon, Chief Justice (retired), Third Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.

See Tex. Gov’t Code § 74.003(b).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWIN LOPEZ-MENDEZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-70642 

Agency No. A095-756-777 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 16, 2018**

Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Edwin Lopez-Mendez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 19 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-70642 

the agency's continuous physical presence determination, Gutierrez v. Mukasey, 

521 F.3d 1114, 1116 (9th Cir. 2008), and review de novo questions of 

law, Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the 

petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that LopezMendez failed to establish the requisite ten years of continuous physical presence 

for cancellation of removal, where the record contains a signed Form I-826 and he 

has not shown that his acceptance of administrative voluntary departure in lieu of 

removal proceedings was not knowing and voluntary. See 8 U.S.C. § 

1229b(b)(1)(A); Gutierrez, 521 F.3d at 1117-18 (requiring some evidence that the 

alien was informed of and accepted the terms of the voluntary departure 

agreement). Lopez-Mendez’s testimony does not compel a contrary conclusion, 

where he was given an opportunity to read the Form I-826 before signing it and 

where he has not shown that the representations of immigration officials were 

inaccurate or misleading. Cf. Ibarra-Flores v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 614, 619-20 (9th 

Cir. 2006) (insufficient evidence that alien knowingly and voluntarily accepted 

voluntary departure where record did not contain the voluntary departure form and 

alien’s testimony suggested that he accepted return due to misrepresentations by 

immigration authorities). 

Lopez-Mendez’s related due process claim fails for lack of prejudice. See id. 
3 16-70642 

at 620-21.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 149 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 149

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Permitting the use of the Rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to 
 present posthumously a gold medal on behalf of Congress to Charles M. 
                                Schulz.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 149

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on June 7, 
2001, for a ceremony to present posthumously a gold medal on behalf of 
Congress to Charles M. Schulz. Physical preparations for the ceremony 
shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 
Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 239 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 239

  Expressing the sense of Congress that schools in the United States 
should set aside a sufficient period of time to allow children to pray 
 for, or quietly reflect on behalf of, the Nation during this time of 
        struggle against the forces of international terrorism.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 2, 2001

    Mr. Jones of North Carolina submitted the following concurrent 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
                               Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress that schools in the United States 
should set aside a sufficient period of time to allow children to pray 
 for, or quietly reflect on behalf of, the Nation during this time of 
        struggle against the forces of international terrorism.

Whereas section 4 of title 4, United States Code, establishes the Pledge of 
        Allegiance to the Flag and describes such Pledge as including the phrase 
        ``one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all'';
Whereas in 1954 President Dwight D. Eisenhower, referring to the reference to 
        God in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, said that the Nation had 
        reaffirmed ``the transcendence of religious faith in America's heritage 
        and future; in this way we shall constantly strengthen those spiritual 
        weapons which forever will be our country's most powerful resource in 
        peace and war''; and
Whereas President George W. Bush has asked the people of the United States to 
        pray for those who suffered as a result of the atrocities committed 
        against the United States on September 11, 2001: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that schools in the United States 
should set aside a sufficient period of time to allow children to pray 
for, or quietly reflect on behalf of, the Nation during this time of 
struggle against the forces of international terrorism.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 4.1


 


Share Certificate


 


	 	 	 	 	 
	Number of certificate 	 	 	 	Number of shares 
	 	 	 	 	 


 


BOUSTEAD WAVEFRONT
INC.


COMPANY NUMBER: [NUMBER]


 


THIS SHARE CERTIFICATE CERTIFIES THAT as of
[Transfer date], [Name] of [Address] is the registered holder of [Number] fully paid Class A ordinary share(s) of US$[value] par
value per share in the above named Company which are held subject to, and transferable in accordance with, the memorandum and articles
of association of the Company (as revised).


 


In Witness Whereof the Company has authorized
this certificate to be issued on [Transfer date].


 


	 	By:	

	 	 	[Name]
	 	 	Director
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 6 -00 642 -CR Ro be r to Lope z , A ppe lla nt

v . The State of Texas, App ellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- DC-03 -20 4137 , HO NORAB LE B RENDA KENNEDY , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Roberto L opez seeks to appe al from a judgme nt of convic tion for murder . The trial court has cer

tified that this is a plea bar g ain ca se and L opez has no right of appe al. SeeTex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)( 2). In addition, the pro se notice of appeal was not timely filed. The a ppeal is dismissed. Se eid . rule 25.2(d) .

__________________________________________ J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Patter son and Puryear Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Nove mber 3, 2006 Do No t Pu

bli sh
800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20591

November 17, 2015

Mr. Christopher Dupin 43 Liberty Lane

Hanscom AFB , MA 01731

Dear Mr. Dupin :

This is in response to your letter dated September 17

, 2015

, posted to the public docket (No

. FAA

- 2015

- 393 8 ) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (F AA) to initiate rulemaking to amend § 91.307(c) of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)

. In your petition, you request that § 91.307(c) be amended to read as follows:

"Unless each occupant of the aircraft is wearing an approved parachute or if t he aircraft is equipped with an approved airframe parachute system, no pilot of a civil aircraft carrying any person (other than a crewmember) may execute a

maneuver that exceeds

- ...."

In accordance with 14 CFR § 11.73 , the FAA must use the following crit eria when making a decision as to whether or not to amend current regulations based on a petition for rulemaking:

1) The immediacy of the safety or security concerns you raise; 2) The priority of other issues the FAA must deal with; and 3) The resources we have a vailable to address these issues

.

Each year, t he FAA prioritizes its rulemaking projects based on issues that are crucial to the safety of the aviation community and the traveling public to ensure the FAA delivers the most value to the aviation system

.

After reviewing your request b ased on the current priorities for the FAA and the guidelines found in § 11.73, we determined the issue you raised does not meet the criteria to pursue rulemaking at this time. However, your comments and arguments for the

p roposed rule change in your petition will be placed in a database, which we will examine when we consider future rulemaking.

If the FAA does pursue rulemaking in this area in the future, you would be able to find

out and track it through one of the two following websites :2

 For significant rulemakings, you can find the status on the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) website ( http://www.dot.gov/regulations/report

- on

signific ant

- rulemakings )

.

 For non

- significant rulemakings, you can find the status on the DOT’s semi

annual regulatory agenda , through the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) Office of Information and Regulatory Affair’s (OIRA) Unified Agenda website ( http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaMain ).

For the reasons above, we are dismissing your petition for rulemaking in accordance with 14 CFR § 11.73.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards Service