alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
File Name: Implicit Price Code Unweighted.txt

Author: Robert Johnston, Clark University

Created: November 8, 2011

Purpose: This file presents the STATA .do file code used to estimate implicit

prices for survey regions based unweighted models.

clear

set matsize 200

set mem 400m

set more off

set seed 12345

insheet using covb_316b_nov8.txt

mkmat neither com_fish fish_pop fish_sav aquatic cost nsneither nscom_fish

nsfish_pop nsfish_sav nsaquatic com_ne fish_ne fish_com fiso_ne fiso_com fish_fis

aqua_ne aqua_com aqua_fis aquo_fis sdneither sdcom_fish sdfish_pop sdfish_sav

sdaquatic, matrix(covmat)

insheet using betas_316b_nov8.txt, clear

mkmat neither com_fish fish_pop fish_sav aquatic cost nsneither nscom_fish

nsfish_pop nsfish_sav nsaquatic com_ne fish_ne fish_com fiso_ne fiso_com fish_fis

aqua_ne aqua_com aqua_fis aquo_fis sdneither sdcom_fish sdfish_pop sdfish_sav

sdaquatic, matrix(beta)

drawnorm neither1 com_fish1 fish_pop1 fish_sav1 aquatic1 cost1 nsneither1

nscom_fish1 nsfish_pop1 nsfish_sav1 nsaquatic1 com_ne1 fish_ne1 fish_com1

fiso_ne1 fiso_com1 fish_fis1 aqua_ne1 aqua_com1 aqua_fis1 aquo_fis1 sdneither1

sdcom_fish1 sdfish_pop1 sdfish_sav1 sdaquatic1, n(1000) cov(covmat) means(beta)

seed(999) clear

generate n=1000

expand n

generate com_fish2 = (com_fish1 + sdcom_fish1*invnormal(uniform()))

generate fish_pop2 = (fish_pop1 + sdfish_pop1*invnormal(uniform()))

generate fish_sav2 = (fish_sav1 + sdfish_sav1*invnormal(uniform()))

generate aquatic2 = (aquatic1 + sdaquatic1*invnormal(uniform()))

generate neither2 = (neither1 + sdneither1*invnormal(uniform()))

generate cost2 = -cost1

generate wtp_com = (com_fish2)/cost2

generate wtp_pop = (fish_pop2)/cost2

generate wtp_sav = (fish_sav2)/cost2

generate wtp_aquat = (aquatic2)/cost2

generate wtp_ne = (neither2)/cost2

summarize wtp_com, detail

summarize wtp_pop, detail

summarize wtp_sav, detail

summarize wtp_aquat, detail

summarize wtp_ne, detail

by cost1, sort: egen wtp_com_mean = mean(wtp_com)

by cost1, sort: egen wtp_pop_mean = mean(wtp_pop)

by cost1, sort: egen wtp_sav_mean = mean(wtp_sav)

by cost1, sort: egen wtp_aquat_mean = mean(wtp_aquat)

by cost1, sort: egen wtp_ne_mean = mean(wtp_ne)

collapse wtp_com_mean wtp_pop_mean wtp_sav_mean wtp_aquat_mean wtp_ne_mean,

by(cost1)

summarize wtp_com_mean wtp_pop_mean wtp_sav_mean wtp_aquat_mean wtp_ne_mean,

detail

Page 1
Page 2
III

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 264

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 9, 2001

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas Congress is pleased to welcome the Prime Minister

of India, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, on his visit to the United

States;

Whereas the United States and India, the world’s two largest

democracies, are natural allies, based on their shared values and common interests in building a stable, peaceful,

and prosperous world in the 21st century;
2

HCON 264 RDS

Whereas from the very day that the terrorist attacks in New

York and Washington occurred, India has expressed its

condolences for the terrible losses, its solidarity with the

American people, and its pledge of full cooperation in the

campaign against international terrorism;

Whereas India, which has been on the front lines in the fight

against international terrorism for many years, directly

shares America’s grief over the terrorist attacks against

the United States on September 11, 2001, with the number of missing Indian nationals and persons of Indian origin estimated at 250;

Whereas the United States and India are engaged as partners in a global coalition to combat the scourge of international terrorism, a partnership that began well before

the tragic events of September 11, 2001;

Whereas cooperation between India and the United States extends beyond the current international campaign against

terrorism, and has been steadily developing over recent

years in such areas as preserving stability and growth in

the global economy, protecting the environment, combating infectious diseases, and expanding trade, especially

in emerging knowledge-based industries and high technology areas; and

Whereas more than 1,000,000 Americans of Indian heritage

have contributed immeasurably to American society:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress—

3 (1) to welcome the Prime Minister of India,

4 Atal Bihari Vajpayee, to the United States;
3

HCON 264 RDS

1 (2) to express profound gratitude to the Gov2 ernment of India for its expressions of sympathy for

3 the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and its

4 demonstrated willingness to fully cooperate with the

5 United States in the campaign against terrorism;

6 and

7 (3) to pledge commitment to the continued ex8 pansion of friendship and cooperation between the

9 United States and India.

Passed the House of Representatives November 8,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.

By MARTHA C. MORRISON,

Deputy Clerk.
[No. 13815-1-III.

Division Three.

June 11, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Miguel A. Gurrola, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 91-1-00963-1, Robert N. Hackett, Jr., J., entered January 14, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Thompson, J., concurred in by Sweeney, C.J., and Schultheis, J.
Exhibit
        10.32
  **Promissory
      Note Amendment**




**(James
      Morel)**




This
      Promissory Note Amendment (this " Amendment ")
      amends
      that certain Promissory Note dated November 15, 2005 issued by DrTattoff, LLC
      ("Maker") to the undersigned in the original principal amount of $12,000 (the
      " Promissory
      Note ").




The
      Promissory Note is due on demand by the undersigned. The undersigned hereby
      agrees that the Promissory Note shall mature and be due and payable in full
      on
      the earlier of April 1, 2008 or the closing of "Series B" round of financing
      of
      Maker that is currently contemplated by Maker in connection with and after
      the
      prospective merger by Maker with Lifesciences Opportunities Incorporated.




/s/ James
              MorelJames
              MorelDated: July 2, 2007
### -:'iRTMENTO F ^ ,^:.!SPORW!O N August201 1 ""::.:? ! OPERATiONS

' mrr V - q D 3 : 5 1 Aloh aLe y Associat e Directo r Smal l Community Ai r

Servic e Developmen t

Progra m Unite dState s Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jerse y Avenu e S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : Rhinelander/Oneid aCounty Airport Gran t Proposal . Dea r Ms . Ley : I recentl y learne dthat

Rhinelander/Oneid aCoun t Airport ha s bee n notifie db y Delt aAi r Line s tha t th e carrie r

wil l en ddecade s o f

servic e t o th e regio n o n Septembe r 5 , 2011 . Th e clear

reaso n provide dfor

th e decisio n i s not

traffi c levels , pe r

se , bu t simpl y tha t

Delta' s syste mi s restructurin g an dreducin g it s regiona l fleet. Th e fallou t i s tha t Rhinelande r

i s losin g th e majority o f it s coimectivity wit h th e nationa l an dgloba l ai r transportatio n system . Whe n Delt awithdraws , th e onl y optio n remainin g currentl y for aresiden t

o f th e Oneid aCounty are ai s Frontie r

Airlines . However , flying with Frontie r wil l i n mos t

case s requir e coimectin g throug h tw o additiona l airports . Fo r example , I currentl y trave l t o Lo s Angele s (LAX ) ever y week ; t o ge t

fromRH I t o LA X viaFrontier , I wil l nee dt o connec t i n both Milwauke e (MKE ) an dDenve r

(DEN) . Thi s translate s int o practicall y a n entir e da y spen t

traveling , an dan y additiona l tim e spen t

travelin g i s tim e awa y fro mm y famil y an dmy availabilit y t o perfor m my work . Th e Airport

inform s m e tha t

i t ha s identifie dasolutio n i n recruitin g servic e t o Chicago/0'Hare . In fac t connectivity o f

eithe r o f th e tw o hubbin g carrier s (America n o r United ) a t O'Har e wil l allo w mor e acces s tha n th e traditiona l servic e t o Minneapolis/St . Paul . A s a n individua l wh o travel s fo r busines s o n aweekl y basis , losin g acces s t o majo r airport s du e t o Delta's withdrawa l fromth e Rhinelander/Oneid aCoun t Airport ha s asever e impac t

o n m y abiht y t o continu e m y livelihoo dwhil e livin g i n Oneid aCounty . Withou t a n additiona l airlin e t o replac e Delt aan d supplemen t

Frontier,' s limite dabiht y t o connec t t o othe r airports , I wil l hav e n o choic e bu t t o mov e ou t o f th e are at o acommunit y wit h bette r connectivit y t o th e res t

o f th e nation . I appreciat e th e Department' s consideratio n o f thi s reques t

an dI hop e tha t

I'l l hav e mor e choice s o f

trave l in-and-ou t

o f th e Rhinelander/Oneid aCoun t Airpor t i n th e nea r

future . Kindes t regards . /%^ ' Mar k J . E . Glinski
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer of GFIGroup Inc.Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of GFI Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James A. Peers, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to the 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to my knowledge:

1.      TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| Date: November 14, 2005 |                      |
|------------------------------|---------------------------|
|                         | /s/  JAMES A. PEERS       |
|                              | James A. Peers            |
|                         | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

1

----
[No. 36522-3-I.

Division One.

June 3, 1996.]

#### Michael R. Jones, et al., *Respondents,*v. Jen-Dong Chen, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-2-22089-6, Larry A. Jordan, J., entered March 27, 1995. *Reversed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
[No. 14949-8-III.

Division Three.

August 27, 1996.]

#### Premier One, Inc., *Respondent,*v. Tempo One Stop Record, Inc., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 91-2-00273-2, Kathleen M. O’Connor, J., entered June 2, 1995. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Thompson, J., concurred in by Schultheis, A.C.J., and Munson, J.
Exhibit 10.5


 


[Kennedy and Coe, LLC Logo]


 


May 17, 2005


 


East Kansas Agri-Energy, LLC


Board of Directors


210 1⁄2 East 4th, P.O. Box 225


Garnett, Kansas 66032


 


We appreciate the opportunity to propose to be of service to East
Kansas Agri-Energy, LLC.  Below is our
understanding of the services we are proposing to provide.


 


Assist in Monthly and Quarterly Financial Reporting:


 


We will provide accounting assistance to East Kansas Agri-Energy, LLC
staff and management, our services will include:


 


•                  Assistance with
inventory valuation and costing


•                  Assistance with
Balance Sheet account reconciliations


•                  Assistance with
preparation of monthly financial statements


•                  Assist with
maintenance of fixed asset living and depreciation schedule


•                  Comparison and
analysis of actual results to budget


•                  Review loan
covenants compared to actual results


 


We do not anticipate our services including the following:


 


•                  Reconciliation
of bank accounts


•                  Maintenance of
the accounts receivable ledgers


•                  Maintenance of
the accounts payable ledgers


•                  Maintenance of
inventory transaction register


•                  Other items of a
similar nature


 


The items excluded above are those activities that must be accounted
for on a daily basis as required for cash management, grain procurement and
plant operating efficiency purposes.


 


Our fees will be based on our standard hourly rates which we estimate
to be $2,500 a month, plus out of pocket expenses.  It is reasonable to expect the fees to be
more the first couple of months due to plant start-up and several accounting
and costing measures that must be setup.


 


The parties agree that if an unanticipated need arises (such as, but
not limited to, an audit by a taxing agency, or any other service not
anticipated in this agreement by the parties), Kennedy and Coe, LLC hereby
agrees to perform this additional work at a mutually agreed upon price before the service is provided.  This service will be billed separately, and
will be payable within 30 days of presentation.


 





















 


If you agree that the above adequately sets forth your understanding of
our mutual responsibilities please authorize this Agreement and return it to
our office.  A copy is provided for your
records.


 


We would like to take this opportunity to express our appreciation for
the opportunity to serve you.


 


	
  Very truly yours,

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ David H. Burger

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  David H. Burger, Member

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Kennedy and Coe, LLC

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ William R. Pracht

  	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
  6-13-05

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Board Member

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  East Kansas Agri-Energy, LLC
Request for Exemption to Part 91, SFAR no.108

SimCom Training Centers is a 14 CFR , FAR Part 142 training provider engaged in providing in - aircraft training and is the sole source simulator based pilot training provider in the Mitsubishi MU - 2 B series aircraft. According to SFAR 108, 5.(4), (b),(3)(ii) a simulator instructor must, within the preceding 12 months, have either 50 hours of MU - 2B series airplane pilot - in - command experience or 50 hours providing simulator or flight training device instructi on for the MU - 2. SimCom is of the opinion that 50 hours of instruction given in a simulator is reasonable as a recency - ofexperience requirement for an otherwise qualified instructor, but places an undue burden on us as an initial requirement. SimCom is s eeking relief from this as an initial qualification requirement and offers an alternate means of meeting this requirement . At this time there are 248 MU - 2 aircraft registered in the US and this number is decreasing steadily. As this number dwindles so doe s the pool of pilots and potential instructor candidates. From a business perspective, SimCom must rent an aircraft for a candidate instructor to accumulate the required time in aircraft making it an expensive proposition to hire zero or low time MU - 2 pil ot/instructors. As a simulator- only instructor it is reasonable to assume the candidate instructor will not have flown the aircraft for 50 hours and cannot meet the instructor requirement without first being qualified to instruct which is precluded by the requirement except by flight in the aircraft. To our knowledge requiring a simulator instructor to have time in type is unprecedented in the pilot training industry and while SimCom is certainly aware of the purpose of the SFAR as a safety mechanism, we feel that safety will not be compromised by granting this exemption. In lieu of this requirement SimCom proposes to substitute the 50 hour aircraft flight time initial requirement with 50 hours of supervised instruction . The supervisory instructor will be a qualified MU 2B instructor. This supervised instruction will be recorded in the instructor’ s training file for inspection.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application.

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2012-0035.                

*Date Filed:*                     March 7, 2012.                

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                

*Subject:*                     Mail Vote 702—Resolution 100 Standard Condition Resolution for Special Fares (Memo 1665) Intended effective date: 1 April 2012.                

Renee V. Wright,

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2012-8446 Filed 4-9-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
IA

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 101

Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained in section 402(c)

of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to Vietnam.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 25, 2002

Mr. ROHRABACHER introduced the following joint resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of the waiver authority contained

in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect

to Vietnam.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress does not approve the extension of the

4 authority contained in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of

5 1974 recommended by the President to the Congress on

6 June 3, 2002, with respect to Vietnam.

Æ
----

|   | 1.     | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|   | 2.     | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of the dates and for the periods covered by the  report. |

|   | /s/      Thomas A. Borner    |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas      A. Borner        |   |
|   | Chief      Executive Officer |   |
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Wanda J. McBride, Appellant

No. 06-20-00028-CV v.

Dr. Pavan Rao Saridena, Appellee

Appeal from the 124th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2018-

841-B). Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Justice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss 

and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the order of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Wanda J. McBride, pay all costs incurred by reason 

of this appeal.

RENDERED MAY 14, 2021

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
**
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANTTO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15(d)-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

*I, Anthony R. Page, certify that:*

 
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Jaguar Global GrowthCorporation I; 

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 
 a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 
 b)
Paragraph intentionally omitted in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33-8238/34-47986 and 33-8392/34-49313;

 
 c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 
 d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

 
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 
 a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 
 b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 31, 2022 

 

/s/ Anthony R. Page
Anthony R. PageChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)**