alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6541

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT J. MERRITT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR95-167-S, CA-97-3672-S, CA-98-321-S) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 26, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert J. Merritt, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen O’Connell Gavin, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Merritt , Nos. CR-95-167-S; CA-97-3672-S;CA-98-321-S (D. Md. Nov. 4, 1997; Feb. 3, 1998). To the extent Appellant seeks to raise issues on appeal which were not properly presented to the district court for determination, we decline to consider those issues. We deny Appellant’s motion for expedited treatment and for oral argument. The facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### 41

Order issued September , 2012

In The 

### Tourt of Apptats Iffift4 Elistrirt uf Jtxas at Dallas

No. 05-12-00586-CR TIMOTHY MANIMOI, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee



### ORDER

The Court REINSTATES this appeal. On August 3, 2012, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the reporter's record had not been filed. On August 20, 2012, we received an extension request from court reporter Sharon Hazlewood and on September 17, 2012, we received the reporter's record. Therefore, we VACATE the August 3, 2012 order requiring findings. We GRANT the August 20, 2012 extension request. The reporter's record is considered properly filed. Appellant's brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

# ‘LDAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

STATE OF DELAWARE, )

)

v. ) I.D. No. 1707010054

)

ANTONIO RUSSELL

, )

)

Defendant. )

Date Submitted: February 25, 2022

Date Decided: May 16 , 20 2 2

ORDER

U pon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Sentence Modification

(“Motion”) ; 1 Superior Court Criminal Rule 35 ; statutory and decisional law; and the

record in this case

, IT APPEARS THAT :

1. On August 21, 2018, Defendant pled guilty to three charges: (1 )

Manslaughter ; (2) Possession of a Firearm During the Commission of the Felony

(“PFDCF”) ; and (3) Pos session of a Firearm by a Person Prohibited (“PFBPP”). 2

2. On January 25, 201 9

, the Court sentenced Defendant as follows: for

Manslaughter (IN17

- 07

- 0918), 25 years at Level V, suspended after 12 years at

Level V KEY , for 13 years at Level IV DOC Discretion, suspended after 6 months

at Level IV DOC Discretion, for 18 months at Level III, hold at Level III until sp ace

1 D.I. 79

. 2 D.I. 35.2

is available at Level IV DOC Discretion; for PFDCF (IN17

- 07

- 0920), 3 years at

Level V; and for PFBPP, 8 years at Level V, suspended for 1 year at Level III. 3

3 . On February 25, 202 2 , Defendant filed the instant Motion. 4 Defendant

asks the Court to modify his sentence as follows:

25yrs Sus for 8yrs lvl 5 & successful completion of lvl 5 program Road

To Recovery; 1 yr work release; 18 months lvl 3(Task); or alternatively,

25 yrs at lvl 5 sus for 10yrs lvl 5 and successful completion of any lvl

5 progr am that supercede [sic] KEY followed by 6 months lvl 4 DOC

discreation [sic] held at lvl 3 to lvl 4 available. 5

Defendant is primarily concerned with being resentenced to substance abuse

treatment programming now that the KEY program is no long er availab le.

4

. As stated in Defendant’s Sentence Order, Defendant shall “[b]e

evaluated for substance abuse and follow any recommendations for counseling,

testing or treatment deemed appropriate.” 6 The DOC will conduct the evaluation

and determine Defendant’s treatment needs

.

5. In addition, this is Defendant's second request to modify his sentence

under Rule 35(b), and therefore, this Motion is barred as repetitive. 7

3 D.I. 51. Probation is concurrent. Id

. 4 D.I. 79

. 5 Id

. The sentence is effective July 25, 2017.

6 D.I. 51.

7 D.I. 52, 54; State v. Bednash , 2020 WL 2917305, *2 (Del. Super. June 3, 2020).3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s

Motion for Sentence Modification is DENIED

.

IT IS SO ORDERED

.

/ s / Jan R. Jurden

Jan R. Jurden, President Judge

Original to Prothonotary:

cc: Ma tthew B. Frawley , DAG

Antonio Russell (SBI #00836045 )
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7440

GREGORY SNOW,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD MOATS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-97-

3226-MJG)

Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: March 12, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Snow, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Snow v. Moats, No. CA-97-3226-MJG (D. Md.

Oct. 1, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion to compel the district

court to transfer his petition to the Supreme Court and dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
November 1, 2011

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

LEVIATHAN ENTERPRISES GROUP, INC., Appellant

NO. 14-11-00443-CV V.

ULYSSES W. WATKINS, FAMILY CARE MEDICAL CLINIC, INC., ARNOLD S. 

COHN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. AND ARAMCO INVESTMENT GROUP, Appellees

____________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment 

signed by the court below on January 26, 2011. Having considered the motion and found 

it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

LEVIATHAN ENTERPRISES GROUP, INC.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 76

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the East Front of the Capitol Grounds for performances sponsored by the

John F. Kennedy Center for the PerformingArts.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 76

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

•HCON 76 EH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING USE OF EAST FRONT OF CAP2 ITOL GROUNDS FOR PERFORMANCES SPON3 SORED BY KENNEDY CENTER.

4 In carrying out its duties under section 4 of the John

5 F. Kennedy Center Act (20 U.S.C. 76j), the John F. Ken6 nedy Center for the Performing Arts, in cooperation with

7 the National Park Service (in this resolution jointly re8 ferred to as the ‘‘sponsor’’), may sponsor public perform9 ances on the East Front of the Capitol Grounds at such

10 dates and times as the Speaker of the House of Represent11 atives and Committee on Rules and Administration of the

12 Senate may approve jointly.

13 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Any performance authorized

15 under section 1 shall be free of admission charge to the

16 public and arranged not to interfere with the needs of

17 Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Archi18 tect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board.

19 (b) ASSUMPTION OF LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall

20 assume full responsibility for all liabilities incident to all

21 activities associated with the performance.

22 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

23 (a) STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.—In consultation

24 with the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the

25 Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate, the

26 Architect of the Capitol shall provide upon the Capitol
3

•HCON 76 EH

1 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and

2 other related structures and equipment as may be required

3 for a performance authorized under section 1.

4 (b) ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.—The Architect of

5 the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board may make such

6 additional arrangements as may be required to carry out

7 the performance.

8 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

9 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce10 ment of the restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act

11 of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), con12 cerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations

13 on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions appli14 cable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to a perform15 ance authorized by section 1.

16 SEC. 5. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.

17 A performance may not be conducted under this reso18 lution after September 30, 2001.

Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 68 (Monday, April 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8503]



[[Page 21098]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9656-6]


Notice of Meeting of the Environmental Financial Advisory Board 
(EFAB), and Transit-Oriented Development Workshop

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) 
Environmental Financial Advisory Board (EFAB) will hold a meeting on 
May 22-23, 2012 and a Transit-Oriented Development Workshop on May 24, 
2012. EFAB is an EPA advisory committee chartered under the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (FACA) to provide advice and recommendations to 
EPA on creative approaches to funding environmental programs, projects, 
and activities. The purpose of the meeting is to hear from informed 
speakers on environmental finance issues, proposed legislation, Agency 
priorities and to discuss progress with work projects under EFAB's 
current Strategic Action Agenda.
    Environmental Finance topics expected to be discussed include: 
clean air technology; tribal environmental programs; transit-oriented 
development; energy efficiency; green infrastructure; and drinking 
water pricing.
    The meeting is open to the public, however, seating is limited. All 
members of the public who wish to attend the meeting should register in 
advance, no later than Monday, May 14, 2012.

DATES: 
Tuesday, May 22, 2012 from 1 p.m.-5 p.m.,
Wednesday, May 23, 2012 from 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m., and
Thursday, May 24, 2012 from 9 a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The Westin Alexandria, 400 Courthouse Square, Alexandria, VA 
22314.
    Registration and Information Contact:
    For information on access or services for individuals with 
disabilities, or to request accommodations for a disability, please 
contact Sandra Williams, U.S. EPA, at (202) 564-4999 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b9ced0d5d5d0d8d4ca97cad8d7ddcbd8f9dcc9d897ded6cf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d6a1bfbababfb7bba5f8a5b7b8b2a4b796b3a6b7f8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>, at least 10 days prior to the meeting, to 
allow as much time as possible to process your request.
    Members of the public who would like to attend the meeting please 
register on or before May 14, 2012 at: www.epa.gov/envirofinance/efabmtg.html.

    Dated: March 30, 2012.
Joseph L. Dillon,
Director, Center for Environmental Finance.
[FR Doc. 2012-8503 Filed 4-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSB Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Robert J. Halloran, Jr., Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 12,
2006/s/ Robert J. Halloran, Jr.Robert J. Halloran, Jr.Vice President and Treasurer
[No. 35952-5-I.

Division One.

June 17, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Reginald Elmore, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for What-com County, No. 88-1-00423-7, Michael F. Moynihan, J., entered December 19, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 145

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Condemning the recent order by the Taliban regime

of Afghanistan to require Hindus in Afghanistanto wear symbols identifying them as Hindu.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 145

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

guarantee the freedom of religion;

Whereas on May 22, 2001, the Taliban regime of Afghanistan directed Hindus and other non-Muslims to wear a

yellow identity symbol and for Hindu women to fully

cover themselves in a veil;
2

•HCON 145 EH

Whereas this proposal is reminiscent of the yellow Star of

David that Jews were forced to wear in Nazi Germany

and Nazi-occupied areas;

Whereas Department of State spokesperson Richard Boucher

condemned the Taliban action, stating that ‘‘forcing social groups to wear distinctive clothing or identifying

marks stigmatizes and isolates those groups and can

never, never be justified’’;

Whereas the Taliban regime recently offended the world by

ordering the destruction of all pre-Islamic statues in Afghanistan, among them a pair of 1,600-year-old, 100-

foot-tall statues of Buddha that were carved out of a

mountainside;

Whereas the reprehensible policies of the Taliban are exacerbating the suffering of the people of Afghanistan who are

already besieged by a devastating drought and the continued fighting in the region; and

Whereas the American people feel a great deal of sympathy

for the people of Afghanistan and continue to provide humanitarian assistance to alleviate the suffering of the Afghan people: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress—

3 (1) strongly condemns the Taliban’s use of Nazi

4 tactics to force Hindus in Afghanistan to wear sym5 bols identifying them as Hindu;

6 (2) joins with people of all faiths around the

7 world in standing against the religious persecution

8 by the Taliban regime;
3

•HCON 145 EH

1 (3) demands the Taliban regime immediately

2 revoke its order stigmatizing Hindus and other non3 Muslims in Afghanistan and conform its laws to all

4 basic international civil and human rights standards;

5 and

6 (4) calls on the Government of Pakistan to use

7 its influence with the Taliban regime to demand that

8 the Taliban revoke the reprehensible policy of forc9 ing Afghan Hindus and other non-Muslims to wear

10 a yellow identity symbol.

Passed the House of Representatives June 13, 2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
U. S. Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service

NOTICE OF SALE OF COTTON

FOR RELEASE AT 2:00 P.M. CT March 10, 2020

USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service today announced the sale of Cotton. The cotton bales were sold under 

Invitation 2020U0042 dated March 9, 2020.

Invitation 2020U0042

Catalog Lot 

No. Catalog Location Purchaser Pounds Sold Price Sold (per Pound) CCC Revenue 

3 ALTUS, OK ACG Cotton 

Marketing LLC 19,442 0.5068 $9,853.21 

4 ALTUS, OK ALLENBERG COTTON 

CO. 66,013 0.5342 $35,264.14 

85,455 $45,117.35
## HUSCHBLACKWELL
Virginia L. Fry Partner 901 St.Louis Street, Suite 1800 Springfield, MO 65806 Direct: 417.268.4059 Fax: 417.268.4040 virginia.fiy@huschblackwell.com August 30, 2013

~ :. ~,~ ~_.~~:. VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Ms. Brooke Chapman Associate Director Small Community Air Service Development Program bffice ofAviation Analysis 8thFloor, Room W86-307 United States Department ofTransportation 1200New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Branson Regional Airport Transportation Development District Application Small Community Air Service Development Program Docket ID: DOT-OST-2013-0120 Dear Ms. Chapman: I am writing in support ofthe Small Community Air Service Grant application that has been submitted by the Branson, Missouri Regional Airport Transportation Development District inconnection with the Branson Regional Airport. Iam aresident ofsouthwest Missouri and serve onthe Executive Committee ofourfirm, which has offices inmany ofthe cities that the Branson Regional Airport now serves and hopes to serve in the future. Our attorneys often use the Branson Regional Airport for business and personal travel and many ofour friends and family use the airport in connection with their travel to and from this part ofthe State ofMissouri. The opening of the Branson Regional Airport has been a tremendous benefit to the economy in and around the area and we are fortunate to have such an asset. The Branson Regional Airport has done an outstanding job attracting Frontier and Southwest Airlines to the area and we look forward totheir continued success.

SPH-2099551-1 Husch Blackwell LLP

## .•.• USCHBLACKWELL
August 30, 2013 Page 2 

### We hope that you will favorably consider the Transportation Development District's grantapplication. Sincerely, 

### -{/illjUU 0 

# c7

# h;r:- Virginia1. Fry

SPH-2099551-1 Husch Blackwell LLP
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 89 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 89

Designating the Henry Clay Desk in the Senate Chamber for assignment to 
      the senior Senator from Kentucky at that Senator's request.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 28, 1999

Mr. McConnell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating the Henry Clay Desk in the Senate Chamber for assignment to 
      the senior Senator from Kentucky at that Senator's request.

    Resolved, That during the One Hundred Sixth Congress and each 
Congress thereafter, the desk located within the Senate Chamber and 
used by Senator Henry Clay shall, at the request of the senior Senator 
from the State of Kentucky, be assigned to that Senator for use in 
carrying out his or her senatorial duties during that Senator's term of 
office.
                                 <all>
```
Virtual - May 12-13, 2021

Wednesday - May 12

11:00 am Call to Order and Welcome Matthew Kerrigan, GIAC Vice-Chair 

11:15 am Greetings Bruce Summers, AMS Administrator

11:25 am FGIS Updates Arthur Neal, FGIS Deputy Administrator

11:45 am Financial Overview Denise Ruggles, FGIS Executive Program Analyst

12:00 pm Recommendations Update Arthur Neal

Dr. Edward Jhee, Director, FGIS Technology and Science Division

1:15 pm Lunch

2:15 pm Discuss Industry Issues: GIAC

• Corn Borer

• Average Inspection Flexibilities

• Falling Number

3:00 pm Break

3:15 pm Discuss Industry Issues: Continued GIAC

4:30 pm Public Comments Matthew Kerrigan

5:00 pm Adjourn Matthew Kerrigan

Grain Inspection Advisory Committee Meeting

All times reflect Eastern Standard Time
Thursday - May 13

11:00 am Call to Order Matthew Kerrigan

11:15 am FGIS FDA MOU Discussion Anthony Goodeman, Director, FGIS, Field Management Division

12:00 pm Public Comments Matthew Kerrigan

12:30 pm Discuss Recommendations Matthew Kerrigan

1:15 pm Lunch

2:15 pm Discuss Recommendations Matthew Kerrigan

3:15 pm Break

3:30 pm Officer Elections Matthew Kerrigan

4:00 pm Discuss Agenda Items for Next Meeting Matthew Kerrigan

4:45 pm Closing Remarks Arthur Neal

Matthew Kerrigan

5:00 pm Meeting Adjourns

Grain Inspection Advisory Committee Meeting
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWIN LOPEZ

- MENDEZ,

Petitioner,

v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 16

- 70642 Agency No. A095

- 756

- 777

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted January 16, 2018 **

Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Edwin Lopez

- Mendez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of t he Board of Immigr ation Appeals’ order dismissing his a ppeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)

. 

# FILED

JAN 19 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 70642

the agency 's continuous physical presence de termination, Gutierrez v. Mukasey , 521 F.3d 1114, 1116 (9th Cir. 2008), and review de novo questions of law, Mohammed v. Gonzales , 400 F.3d 785, 791

- 92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.
Substanti al evidence supports the agency’ s determinat ion that Lopez

Mendez failed to establish the requisite ten years of continuous physical presence for cancellation of removal, where the record contains a signed Form I

- 826 and he
has not shown that h is acceptance of administrative voluntary departure in l ieu of removal proceedings was not knowing and voluntary

. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(A); Gutierrez , 521 F.3d at 1117

- 18 (requiring some evidence that the alien was informed of and accepted the terms of the voluntary departure agreement) . Lopez

- Mendez’s testimony does not compel a contrary conclusion,
where he was given an opportunity to read the F orm I

- 826 before signing it and
where he has not shown that the represen tations of immigration official s were inaccurate or misleading

. C f. Ibarra

- Flores v. Gon zales , 439 F.3d 614, 619

- 20 (9th Cir. 2006) (insufficient evidence that alien knowingly and voluntarily accepted voluntary departure where record did not contain the voluntary departure form and alien’s testimony suggested that he accepted return due to mi srepresentations by immigration authorities). Lopez

- Mendez’s related due process claim fails for lack of prejudice

. See id.3 16

- 70642

at 620

- 21.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED
.