alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Senate Hearing 114-849]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                                       S. Hrg. 114-849

                                [ERRATA]
                         SUDDEN PRICE SPIKES IN
                    DECADES-OLD PRESCRIPTION DRUGS:
                   INSIDE THE MONOPOLY BUSINESS MODEL

=======================================================================

                                HEARING

                               BEFORE THE

                       SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON AGING

                          UNITED STATES SENATE

                    ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS

                             SECOND SESSION

                               __________

                             WASHINGTON, DC

                               __________

                             MARCH 17, 2016

                               __________

                           Serial No. 114-21

         Printed for the use of the Special Committee on Aging
         
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]         

        Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.govinfo.gov
       
                              __________

                    U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE                    
48-708 PDF                 WASHINGTON : 2022                     
          
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------          
 
                                 [ERRATA]

    An error was made in the hearing Sudden Price Spikes in 
Decades-Old Rx Drugs: Inside the Monopoly Business Model. The 
name Priscilla Hanley was inadvertently listed in the Committee 
member section instead of Mark B. LeDuc as the Majority Staff 
Director for the Special Committee on Aging.
```
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 79

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the

Greater Washington Soap Box Derby.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 79

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

•HCON 79 EH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES

2 ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

3 The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Associa4 tion (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Association’’)

5 shall be permitted to sponsor a public event, soap box

6 derby races, on the Capitol Grounds on June 23, 2001,

7 or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of Rep8 resentatives and the Committee on Rules and Administra9 tion of the Senate may jointly designate.

10 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

11 The event to be carried out under this resolution shall

12 be free of admission charge to the public and arranged

13 not to interfere with the needs of Congress, under condi14 tions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and

15 the Capitol Police Board; except that the Association shall

16 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities

17 incident to all activities associated with the event.

18 SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

19 For the purposes of this resolution, the Association

20 is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds, subject

21 to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, such stage,

22 sound amplification devices, and other related structures

23 and equipment as may be required for the event to be car24 ried out under this resolution.
3

•HCON 79 EH

1 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

2 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police

3 Board are authorized to make any such additional ar4 rangements that may be required to carry out the event

5 under this resolution.

6 SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

7 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce8 ment of the restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act

9 of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), con10 cerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations

11 on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions appli12 cable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event

13 to be carried out under this resolution.

Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
III

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 439

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 23, 2002

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring Corinne ‘‘Lindy’’ Claiborne Boggs on the occasion

of the 25th anniversary of the founding of the Congressional Women’s Caucus.

Whereas in 1977, Lindy Boggs helped found the Congressional Women’s Caucus and served as longtime Caucus

Secretary;

Whereas the Congressional Women’s Caucus is committed to

improving the lives of women and families through legislation and leadership roles;
2

HCON 439 RDS

Whereas the continued success of the Congressional Women’s

Caucus is due to the bipartisan spirit that Lindy Boggs

established;

Whereas Lindy Boggs represented the 2nd district of Louisiana from March 20, 1973, to January 3, 1991;

Whereas Lindy Boggs was the first woman elected to the

United States House of Representatives from Louisiana

and was the first woman to chair a national political convention, leading the convention of 1976 that nominated

former United States President Jimmy Carter;

Whereas Lindy Boggs served on the Committee on Appropriations, was instrumental in creating the Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families, and chaired the

Crisis Intervention Task Force; and

Whereas Lindy Boggs served as United States Ambassador

to the Holy See from December 16, 1997, to March 1,

2001: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress honors Corinne ‘‘Lindy’’

3 Claiborne Boggs for her extraordinary service to the peo4 ple of Louisiana and the United States, recognizes that

5 her role in founding the Congressional Women’s Caucus

6 has improved the lives of families throughout the United
3

HCON 439 RDS

1 States, and commends her bipartisan spirit as an example

2 to all elected officials.

Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2002.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
III

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 77

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 29, 2001

Received and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the efforts

of people of the United States of Korean ancestry to

reunite with their family members in North Korea.

Whereas on June 25, 1950, North Korea invaded South

Korea, thereby initiating the Korean War, leading to the

loss of countless lives, and further polarizing a world engulfed by the Cold War;

Whereas in the aftermath of the Korean War, the division of

the Koreas at the 38th parallel separated millions of
2

HCON 77 RFS

Koreans from their families, tearing at the heart of every

mother, father, daughter, and son;

Whereas on June 13 and 14, 2000, in the first summit conference ever held between leaders of North and South

Korea, South Korean President Kim Dae Jung met with

North Korean leader Kim Jong Il in Pyongyang, North

Korea’s capital;

Whereas in a historic joint declaration, South Korean President Kim Dae Jung and North Korean leader Kim Jong

Il made an important promise to promote economic cooperation and hold reunions of South Korean and North

Korean citizens;

Whereas such reunions have been held in North and South

Korea since the signing of the joint declaration, reuniting

family members who had not seen or heard from each

other for more than 50 years;

Whereas 500,000 people of the United States of Korean ancestry bear the pain of being separated from their families in North Korea;

Whereas the United States values peace in the global community and has long recognized the significance of uniting

families torn apart by the tragedy of war; and

Whereas a petition drive is taking place throughout the

United States, urging the United States Government to

assist in the reunification efforts: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) the Congress and the President should sup4 port efforts to reunite people of the United States of
3

HCON 77 RFS

1 Korean ancestry with their families in North Korea;

2 and

3 (2) such efforts should be made in a timely

4 manner, as 50 years have passed since the separa5 tion of these families.

Passed the House of Representatives November 28,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

State Farm Mutual Automobile :

Insurance Company, :

Petitioner :

:

v. :

:

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, :

Insurance Department, Theresa D. :

Miller, Acting Insurance Commissioner, :

Respondents : No. 167 C.D. 2015

O R D E R

NOW, November 16, 2015, having considered intervenor’s “motion for 

rehearing and or en banc panel review”, the motion is denied.

_____________________________

DAN PELLEGRINI, 

President Judge
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AB Commercial Real Estate Private Debt Fund, LLC (the“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Peter Gordon, as Senior Vice President and Director of the Company, and MargueriteBrogan, as Vice President and Director of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge: 

 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and 

 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 
Date: March 30, 2022  /s/ Peter Gordon  Peter Gordon  Senior Vice President and Director  (Principal Executive Officer)Date: March 30, 2022  /s/ Marguerite Brogan  Marguerite Brogan  Vice President and Director  (Principal Financial Officer)**
EXHIBIT 32

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

GOLD KIST INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gold Kist Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John Bekkers, President and Chief Executive Officer, and principal executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ John Bekkers                     
|John Bekkers                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|May 10, 2006                         



---

EXHIBIT 32

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

GOLD KIST INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gold Kist Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Stephen O. West, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, and principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Stephen O. West                    
|Stephen O. West                        
|Chief Financial Officer, Vice President
|May 10, 2006
**Exhibit 15**

November 10, 2006

GFI Group Inc.100 Wall StreetNew York, New York

We have made a review, in accordance with thestandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), ofthe unaudited interim financial information of GFI Group Inc. and subsidiariesfor the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and2005, as indicated in our report dated November 10, 2006; because we didnot perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, whichis included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended September 30, 2006, is being incorporated by reference inRegistration Statement No. 333-122905 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that theaforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statements preparedor certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by anaccountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

| /s/ DELOITTE &  TOUCHE LLP |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
| New York, New York                  |   |

 

----
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 22, 2024

NO. 03-23-00060-CR

Dillan Marion McCullers, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND SMITH

MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s

judgment of conviction requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment of 

conviction that requires correction. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction to reflect that the “Statute for Offense” was “22.011(a)(1)(A) TEXAS PENAL 

CODE.” The judgment of conviction, as modified, is affirmed. Because appellant is indigent 

and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000848463
<NAME>                        ENEX OIL & GAS INCOME PROGRAM IV - SERIES 2, L.P.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         12521
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  20780
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               33830
<PP&E>                                         1118176
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1099932
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 52074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          18169
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     33905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   52074
<SALES>                                        127862
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127862
<CGS>                                          199479
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  199479
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               26774
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (96523)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
#### Elijah Anderson, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error.

Writ of Error to Criminal Court of Record, Duval county; John W. Dodge, Judge.

*Jolvn F. Hartridge,*for Plaintiff in Error.

No appearance for Defendant in Error.

This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error. There was judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant takes writ of error. On suggestion of the death of the plaintiff in error the cause is abated and the writ of error dismissed.
#### MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE, Petitioner, v. James A. BROWN, Respondent.

No. 5645.

Court of Appeals of Alaska.

April 9, 1981.

Allen M. Bailey, Municipal Prosecutor, Theodore D. Berns, Municipal Atty., Anchorage, for petitioner.

*117Rich Zahniser, Asst. Public Defender, Dana Fabe, Acting Public Defender, Anchorage, for respondent.

Before BRYNER, C. J., COATS and SINGLETON, JJ.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On February 23, 1981, we granted this petition for review of an order of the district court dated November 12, 1980, dismissing a prosecution against respondent for driving while license suspended (DWLS). The district court held that the Alaska Department of Public Safety’s failure to give timely notice to respondent under AS 28.20.050 that his driver’s license would be suspended if he failed to show financial responsibility or contest liability for an accident in which he had been involved precluded subsequent suspension of his license.

We have concluded that the trial court erred and therefore reverse. We read AS 28.20.050 as directory, not mandatory, and we conclude that a failure to give notice within thirty days, as required by the statute, does not preclude a subsequent suspension pursuant to the statute. While there may be a due process right to notice and a hearing as to liability within a reasonable time after an accident, and while that right might be violated in some instances where undue delay results in actual prejudice to the recipient of the late notice, that issue should properly be raised and decided on a case by case basis at the administrative hearing stage, not in a prosecution for driving with a suspended license. The order of the district court dismissing this prosecution is therefore reversed, and this case remanded for trial.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JIANGNING REN,

Appellant,

v.

BMW BANK OF NORTH AMERICA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-2553

[July 29, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Donald W. Hafele, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2018-CA010633-XXXX-MB.

Jiangning Ren, Boynton Beach, pro se.

Amy E. Stoll of Older Lundy & Alvarez, Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
SCWC-30233

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

GREGORY ALLEN SLINGLUFF,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI#I; STATE OF HAWAI#I DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY;

HALAWA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; DR. PATEL; NURSE MIKE;

 NURSE BARBARA; DR. ABBRUZZESE; and DR. SISAR PADERES,

Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NO. 30233; CIV. NO. 06-1-1654)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants’ Application for Writ

of Certiorari, filed on May 23, 2014, is hereby rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 2, 2014.

Caron M. Inagaki

and Kendall J. Moser

for petitioners

Francis L. Jung

and Carol M. Jung and

Richard Turbin and

Janice Heidt for 

respondent

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-30233

02-JUL-2014

10:49 AM
H. Con. Res. 93 Agreed to April 4, 2001

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of

Wednesday, April 4, 2001, or Thursday, April 5, 2001, on a motion

offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader

or his designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, April

24, 2001, or until noon on the second day after Members are

notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent

resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate

recesses or adjourns at the close of business on Friday, April 6,

2001, Saturday, April 7, 2001, Sunday, April 8, 2001, or Monday,

April 9, 2001, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent

resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed

or adjourned until noon on Monday, April 23, 2001, or until such

time on that day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or

his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon

on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs

first.

SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader

of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority

Leader of the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall

notify the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively,
H. Con. Res. 93—2

to reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall

warrant it.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ADIB C. ROUHANA, 

 

 Appellant,

v.

ALBERTO RAMIREZ

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00356-CV

Appeal from the

171st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2015-DCV2915)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until May 24, 2017. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. James D. Lucas, Appellant’s attorney, prepare the 

Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before May 24, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of April, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.