alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From:

"Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: Marc Thomas/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, George Faison/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Tab Tesnau/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lyn Luben/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy Hambrick/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Mimi Guernica/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 06/27/2012 07:01 PM Subject: FW : E.O. 12866 Meeting on EPA Rules

Hi all, Attached are the handouts from this meeting. Regards, Cortney

----- Original Appointment----- **From:** Echols, Mabel E. **Subject:** E.O. 12866 Meeting on EPA Rules **When:** Tuesday, June 19, 2012 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM (UTC- 05:00 ) Eastern Time (US & Canada). **Where:** Jackson Room, White House Conference Center - 726 Jackson Place, NW

This meeting was requested by Lorraine Gershman, American Chemistry Council to discuss the following EPA rules:  National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters; Proposed Reconsideration  National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area Sources: Indust rial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers; Reconsideration and Proposed Rule Amendments  NSPS and EG: Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units: Reconsideration and Proposed Amendments; Non

- Hazardous Secondary Materials That Are Solid Waste: Proposed Rule 

## (See attached file: 2060 - AR13_2012_6_19_ACC_Handout6.pdf) (See attached file: 2060 - AR13_2012_6_19_ACC_Handout5.pdf) (See attached file: 2060 - AR13_2012_6_19_ACC_Handout4.pdf) (See attached file: 2060 - AR13_2012_6_19_ACC_Handout3.pdf) (S ee attached file: 2060

- AR13_2012_6_19_ACC_Handout2.pdf) (See attached file: 2060 - AR13_2012_6_19_ACC_Handout1.pdf)
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Adam Dooley, certifythat: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Everest ConsolidatorAcquisition Corporation; 

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 
 (b)
[Omitted]; 

 
 (c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 
 (d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

 
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 
 (a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 
 (b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 
Date: April 18, 2022  By: /s/Adam Dooley   Adam Dooley   Chief Executive Officer   *(principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)*
 
**
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 84 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 84

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2001

Received and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 
                                Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Supporting the goals of Red Ribbon Week in promoting drug-free 
                              communities.

Whereas the National Family Partnership, Governors, Attorneys General, Parent 
        Teacher Associations, and over 100 other organizations throughout the 
        United States annually cosponsor October 23 through October 31 as Red 
        Ribbon Week;
Whereas the objective of Red Ribbon Week is to promote drug-free communities 
        through drug prevention efforts,

education, parental involvement, and community-wide support;

Whereas drug abuse is one of the major challenges our Nation faces in securing a 
        safe and healthy future for our children; and
Whereas parents, youth, schools, businesses, law enforcement and religious 
        institutions, service organizations, senior citizens, medical and 
        military personnel, sports teams, and individuals throughout the Nation 
        demonstrate their commitment to drug-free, healthy lifestyles by wearing 
        and displaying red ribbons during this weeklong celebration: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) supports the goals of Red Ribbon Week; and
            (2) encourages all Americans to promote drug-free 
        communities and to participate in drug prevention activities to 
        show support for healthy, productive, drug-free lifestyles.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 96-4426 ANTHONY WAYNE CAMERON, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CR-95-266) Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 28, 1997 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Thomas K. Maher, RUDOLF & MAHER, P.A., Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellant. Walter C. Holton, Jr., United States Attorney, Paul A. Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Anthony Cameron pled guilty to conspiring to distribute crack cocaine, carrying or using a firearm during and in relation to a drug offense, and distribution of crack cocaine. The district court sentencedCameron to serve 248 months in prison followed by five years supervised release and to pay a special assessment fee of $100. Cameron appeals his conviction and sentence. Cameron's attorney filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), raising one issue but asserting that there are no meritorious issues for appeal. Cameron was informed of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief, which he has failed to do. Cameron's counsel raises the issue of whether the district court erred in not allowing Cameron to withdraw his guilty plea. Following a de novo review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in not allowing the withdrawal of Cameron's guilty plea. See United States v. Ewing , 957 F.2d 115, 119 (4th Cir. 1992); United States v. Brown , 617 F.2d 54, 55 (4th Cir. 1980). At no time during the plea hearing or sentencing hearing did Cameron ask to withdraw his guilty plea. Consequently, this claim lacks merit. In accordance with the requirements of Anders , we have examined the entire record in this case and find no other meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm Appellant's conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel maymove in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel's motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-864]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT SYSTEM INSURANCE CORPORATION


Board Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board; Regular 
Meeting.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the regular meeting of the Farm 
Credit System Insurance Corporation Board (Board).

DATE AND TIME: The meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of 
the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on January 19, 
2012, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale L. Aultman, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit System Insurance Corporation Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 
883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation, 1501 Farm Credit 
Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting of the Board will be open to 
the public (limited space available). In order to increase the 
accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should 
make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the 
meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

    <bullet> December 8, 2011

B. New Business

    <bullet> Report on Investment Portfolio
    <bullet> Review of Insurance Premium Rates
    <bullet> Overview of Communications Crisis Plan with Porter Novelli

    Dated: January 12, 2012.
Dale L. Aultman,
Secretary, Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board.
[FR Doc. 2012-864 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6710-01-P
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 25, 2012

d0118 

# Order

January 25, 2012

142324(60)

LEE M. KHAN, a/k/a LEE M. KAHAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142324 COA: 293991 Genesee CC: 08-089357-CZ CITY OF FLINT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s July 29, 2011 order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

M ARILYN 

### K ELLY 

### and H ATHAWAY 

### , JJ., would grant reconsideration.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 News
    
        Photos

    Week in Photos

    Air Force TV

    Commentaries

    Features

    Art

    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders
    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Fact Sheets

    SECAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library
    
        CSAF Leadership Library 2022

    CSAF Leadership Library 2021

    CSAF Reading List Pre-2020 Archive
    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library 2023

    CMSAF Leadership Library

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    Adjunct Professors

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Arctic Strategy

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    Careers

    AF Federal Advisory Committees

    AF 75th Anniversary

    Policy Updates

    AF Content Management

    Contact Us

    AF Sites
    
        Site RegistrationU.S. Air Force LogoAir Force

        Policy UpdatesNewsroomReoptimizationBIOGRAPHIESAF Senior Leaders

    HomeNewsCommentaries     Explosive Ordnance Disposal technicians
        
            Commentaries
 Keyword
 Type Select a CategoryTop StoriesMission/TrainingFeaturesSecretary of the AFAF Chief of StaffChief Master Sgt. of the AFCommentariesSequestration NewsSpace/TechnologyHumanitarianAFSO 21Women's History Month 1-15EnvironmentalWarrior CareDiversityDignified TransferSafetyHeritageAir Force FamilyPersonnel MattersCommander's Call TopicsHaiti Earthquake ReliefDon't Ask Don't TellSuicide PreventionWarrior GamesEnergyAircraftEtchbergerSexual AssaultOperation TomodachiOperation Odyssey Dawn2011 Appropriations InformationHurricane Irene9/11AFAWeek in PhotosThrough Airmen's EyesThrough AIrmen's Eyes FeaturesThrough Their Words2012 Appropriations InformationAfrican American History MonthAfrican American Heritage Month 1-15African American Heritage Month 16-29Fiscal Year BudgetAir Force StoriesColorado WildfireChief of Staff ArchiveHurricane IsaacAFA 2012APP RSSAPP Airman VisualsExpeditionary OperationsHurricane SandyTransition GPSAir Force in SpaceSports/RecreationH1N1Women's History Month 16-30Oklahoma Tornado ReliefMemorial DayCOVID-19 CommentariesCOVID-19
 RecentOldestTitle A > ZTitle Z > A
 May 15, 2023Breaking silence: Shattering the taboo of mental health
        As members of the Air Force community, it’s important that we prioritize our mental health and encourage others to do the same.  Quick Links
AccessibilityContact UsEqual OpportunityFOIA | Privacy | Section 508Information QualityInspector GeneralJAG Court-Martial DocketLink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentOSI Tip LinePlain LanguageQuestionsResilienceRSSSite MapVeterans Crisis LineCareers
Join the Air ForceAir Force BenefitsAir Force CareersAir Force ReserveAir National GuardCivilian ServiceConnect
            Get Social with Us
            
            Official United States Air Force Website
    Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Motion Granted and Order filed June 12, 2014. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00448-CV

____________

IN RE FINN KRISTENSEN, AKZO NOBEL POLYMER

CHEMICALS, LLC, AKZO NOBEL, INC., AKZO NOBEL

CHEMICALS, LLC, RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC., AND 

GABE T. VICK, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

151st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-58165

ORDER

On June 11, 2014, relators Finn Kristensen, Akzo Nobel Polymer 

Chemicals, LLC, Akzo Nobel, Inc., Akzo Nobel Chemicals, LLC, Ryder Truck 

Rental, Inc., and Gabe T. Vick, filed a petition for writ of mandamus with this 
2

Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In their petition, 

relators ask this Court to compel the Honorable Mike Engelhart, presiding judge of 

the 151st District Court of Harris County, to vacate three orders requiring relators

to produce certain information and sanctioning one of relators’ attorneys.

Relators also have filed with this Court a motion for temporary relief. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. On June 11, 2014, relators asked this Court to stay 

enforcement of the challenged orders pending disposition by this Court of relators’ 

petition for writ of mandamus.

It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relators’

request for relief requires further consideration and that relators will be prejudiced 

unless immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relators’

motion and issue the following order:

We ORDER any enforcement of the trial court’s orders dated May 7, 2014, 

June 2, 2014, and June 4, 2014 in trial court cause number 2013-58165, styled 

Dononato Castillo, Jr. v. Finn Kristensen, Akzo Nobel Polymer Chemicals, LLC, 

Akzo Nobel, Inc., Akzo Nobel Chemicals, LLC, and Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., 

STAYED until a final decision by this Court on relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus, or until further order of this Court.

In addition, the Court requests real party in interest Dononato Castillo, Jr. to 

file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before June 27, 2014.

See Tex. R. App. P. 52.4.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Wise.
```

[Senate Hearing 114-38]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                                         S. Hrg. 114-38
 
                                [ERRATA]

 OVERSIGHT HEARING ON SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY PANELS AND PROCESSES AT THE 
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND LEGISLATIVE HEARING ON S. 543, THE 
               SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD REFORM ACT OF 2015

=======================================================================

                                HEARING

                               BEFORE THE 

 SUBCOMMITTEE ON SUPERFUND, WASTE MANAGEMENT, AND REGULATORY OVERSIGHT

                                 OF THE

                              COMMITTEE ON
                      ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS
                          UNITED STATES SENATE

                    ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS

                             FIRST SESSION

                               __________

                              MAY 20, 2015

                               __________

  Printed for the use of the Committee on Environment and Public Works
  
  
  
[GRAPHIC NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]  

       Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys

                               __________
                               
                               
                  U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE
94-998 PDF            WASHINGTON : 2016                  
________________________________________________________________________________________                               
                               
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office, 
http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center,
U.S. Government Publishing Office. Phone 202-512-1800, or 866-512-1800 (toll-free). 
E-mail, gpo@custhelp.com.  
                               

                                 ERRATA

    Questions for the record and the witnesses' responses were 
inadvertently omitted from the above hearing. Available in the 
committee's records are questions and responses for the 
following witnesses: Dr. Roger O. McClellan, Mr. Ted Hadzi-
Antich, Mr. Alfredo Gomez, Dr. Terry Yosie, and Mr. Scott 
Faber.
```
A-516 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Agricultural Marketing Service 

Fruit and Vegetable Programs 

Processed Products Branch 

December 2003 

SUBJECT: Instructions for Scoring Headspace Discoloration in U.S. Standards 

for Grades of Canned Dried Beans, Canned Pork and Beans, and 

Canned Baked Beans. 

TO: All Personnel Who Retain the U.S. Standards for Grades of Dried Beans, 

Canned Pork and Beans, and Canned Baked Beans 

FILE UNDER: Commodity File Folder for U.S. Standards for Grades of Dried Beans, 

Canned Pork and Beans, and Canned Baked Beans 

This memorandum establishes percent by net weight tolerances for grading headspace 

discoloration which affects appearance and edibility in canned beans. The United States 

Standards for Grades of Dried Beans, Canned Pork and Beans, and Canned Baked Beans do not 

classify headspace discoloration as scoreable under defects. When grading these items, score 

headspace discoloration under defects. Under the classification of defects, allow no more than 

2% discoloration by net weight for Grade “A” and no more than 4% discoloration by net weight 

for Grade “B”. 

Terry B. Bane 

Branch Chief 

Distribution - Special 

Agriculture - Washington
III

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 483

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 25, 2002

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make

technical corrections in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1646.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 1646)

3 to authorize appropriations for the Department of State

4 for fiscal year 2003, to authorize appropriations under the

5 Arms Export Control Act and the Foreign Assistance Act
2

HCON 483 RDS

1 of 1961 for security assistance for fiscal year 2003, and

2 for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of Representa3 tives shall insert at the appropriate place the following new

4 section (and conform the table of contents accordingly):

5 SEC. 1309. THREE-YEAR INTERNATIONAL ARMS CONTROL

6 AND NONPROLIFERATION STRATEGY.

7 Not later than 180 days after the date of the enact8 ment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall prepare and

9 submit to the appropriate congressional committees a 3-

10 year international arms control and nonproliferation strat11 egy. The strategy shall contain the following:

12 (1) A 3-year plan for the reduction of existing

13 nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and bal14 listic missiles and for controlling the proliferation of

15 these weapons.

16 (2) Identification of the goals and objectives of

17 the United States with respect to arms control and

18 nonproliferation of weapons of mass destruction and

19 their delivery systems.

20 (3) A description of the programs, projects, and

21 activities of the Department of State intended to ac-
3

HCON 483 RDS

1 complish goals and objectives described in paragraph

2 (2).

Passed the House of Representatives September 25,

2002.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.