alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

AMENDMENT TO THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




    This Amendment (“Amendment”) is entered into as of the 20th day of May 2022, by and between Home Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”) and Darren E. Guidry (the “Executive”).


WITNESSETH


    WHEREAS, the Bank and the Executive previously entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2019 (the “Agreement”); and


    WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement in order to extend its term, as provided in Section 2(b) thereof.


    NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:


        1.    The last sentence in Section 2(a) of the Agreement is amended and restated to read as follows: “The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be and remain in effect during the period beginning on the Effective Date of this Agreement and ending on May 20, 2024, plus such extensions, if any, as are provided pursuant to Section 2(b) hereof (the “Employment Period”).”


        2.    Except to the extent expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue unmodified and shall remain in full force and effect.


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed by the parties hereto as of the day and year first written above.


                                HOME BANK, N.A.




                        By:   /s/ John W. Bordelon            
                                John W. Bordelon
                                President and Chief Executive Officer




                                 EXECUTIVE




                                 /s/ Darren E. Guidry            
                                 Darren E. Guidry
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 8220** 

SHAHEEN CABBAGESTALK , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; JON OZMINT; CHAPLAIN VAN BEBBER, Lieber Head Chaplain; HEADQUARTERS CHAPL AIN, in Columbia , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Sol Blatt, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 3:08

- cv - 02718

- SB )

Submitted : March 3, 2010 Decided: April 2, 2010

Before MICHAEL, DUNCAN, and AGEE , Circuit Judges

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Shaheen Cabbagestalk, Appellant Pro Se. William J. Thrower, STUCKEY LAW OFFICES, PA, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Shaheen Cabbagestalk seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We dismiss the appeal f or lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The dist rict court’s judgment was entered on the docket on September 18, 2009. Cabbagestalk’s notice of appeal was deposited in the prison’s internal mail system on November 12, 2009. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). Because Cabbagestalk failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. Cabbagestalk’s motion to comply is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions ar e adequately presented in the3 materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 38

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp

should be issued honoring Martha Matilda Harper, and that the Citizens’

Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend to the Postmaster General

that such a stamp be issued.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 14, 2001

Ms. SLAUGHTER (for herself, Ms. NORTON, Mr. HILLIARD, Mrs. MALONEY of

New York, Ms. MCCARTHY of Missouri, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Ms.

BALDWIN, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mrs. CLAYTON, Mrs. MORELLA, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. KUCINICH, Mrs.

MINK of Hawaii, Mr. FROST, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mrs.

BIGGERT, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. UDALL of Colorado,

Ms. KILPATRICK, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Ms.

MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mrs. THURMAN, Ms. DELAURO, and Mrs.

LOWEY) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative

postage stamp should be issued honoring Martha Matilda

Harper, and that the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend to the Postmaster General that

such a stamp be issued.

Whereas Martha Matilda Harper, after spending much of the

first 25 years of her life as a domestic servant, opened

the Harper Method Shops and School, a health-conscious
2

•HCON 38 IH

hair and skin care store in Rochester, New York, in

1888;

Whereas Martha Matilda Harper subsequently expanded the

business to include 2 international manufacturing centers, 5 training schools, and over 500 beauty shops

around the world;

Whereas Martha Matilda Harper shared the opportunity of

business ownership with former servant women, and created the first franchise business model;

Whereas customers of Harper shops included world leaders,

socialites, and suffragists, such as Presidents Woodrow

Wilson and Calvin Coolidge, Kaiser Wilhelm II, Prime

Minister Anthony Eden, First Ladies Jacqueline Kennedy and Lady Bird Johnson, and Susan B. Anthony;

Whereas Martha Matilda Harper’s 19th century management

practices, which included a customer-oriented focus, an

equitable relationship with staff, a childcare center in

each shop, and the manufacture and promotion of organic products and procedures, would be contemporary

by today’s standards;

Whereas franchising now dominates retail business (with a

new franchise opening every 8 minutes) and generates

more than $1,000,000,000,000 in revenues annually; and

Whereas, for her accomplishments, Martha Matilda Harper

has been referred to by some as the ‘‘mother of franchising’’: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be

4 issued honoring Martha Matilda Harper; and
3

•HCON 38 IH

1 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

2 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

3 such a stamp be issued.

Æ
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 40

Expressing the sense of the Congress that national news organizations should

refrain from projecting the winner of a Presidential election until all

of the polls in the Continental United States have closed.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 27, 2001

Mr. BURTON of Indiana submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that national news

organizations should refrain from projecting the winner

of a Presidential election until all of the polls in the

Continental United States have closed.

Whereas voter participation is vital to a healthy democracy;

Whereas every eligible American should be encouraged to

vote;

Whereas events and actions that may discourage individuals

from voting should be avoided whenever possible;

Whereas there is a clear consensus that in Presidential elections, news organization projections of the winner in certain States can affect voter turnout in other States where

the polls have not yet closed;
2

•HCON 40 IH

Whereas, on election night in 1980, network news organizations announced that their projections showed that Ronald Reagan had won a sufficient number of States to win

the Presidential election well before the polls closed on

the west coast;

Whereas numerous studies have concluded that those projections discouraged individuals in Western States from voting, and may have reduced voter turnout in California by

more than two percent;

Whereas there is widespread agreement that early projections

of the Presidential election in 1980 affected numerous

Congressional, State, and local races in Western States;

Whereas, on election night in 2000, all of the major news organizations announced that their projections showed that

Vice President Al Gore had won the State of Florida

prior to 8:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time;

Whereas these projections of one of the most decisive States

in the Presidential election came more than three hours

before polls closed on the west coast, and roughly ten

minutes before the polls closed in several counties in the

panhandle of Florida itself;

Whereas these projections were found to be erroneous and

had to be retracted;

Whereas later projections that George W. Bush had won the

State of Florida were also retracted;

Whereas early projections again appear to have discouraged

voter turnout in many Western States; and

Whereas these early projections again likely affected many

closely contested Congressional, State, and local elections

in Western States: Now, therefore, be it
3

•HCON 40 IH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that na3 tional news organizations should, through a voluntary, in4 dustry-wide agreement, refrain from reporting projections

5 of the winner of a Presidential election, or the winner of

6 any State in a Presidential election, until all the polls have

7 closed in the Continental United States.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0724 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JAY LE CLEVELAND,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 22 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 13 2023

10/13/2023
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 486

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Supporting the goals and ideals of Pancreatic

Cancer Awareness Month.

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 486

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas over 30,300 people will be diagnosed with pancreatic

cancer this year in the United States;

Whereas the mortality rate for pancreatic cancer is 99 percent, the highest of any cancer;

Whereas pancreatic cancer is the 4th most common cause of

cancer death for men and women in the United States;
2

•HCON 486 EH

Whereas there are no early detection methods and minimal

treatment options for pancreatic cancer;

Whereas when symptoms of pancreatic cancer generally

present themselves, it is too late for an optimistic prognosis, and the average survival rate of those diagnosed

with metastasis disease is only 3 to 6 months;

Whereas pancreatic cancer does not discriminate by age, gender, or race, and only 4 percent of patients survive beyond 5 years;

Whereas the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN),

the only national advocacy organization for pancreatic

cancer patients, facilitates awareness, patient support,

professional education, and advocacy for pancreatic cancer research funding, with a view to ultimately developing

a cure for pancreatic cancer; and

Whereas the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network has requested that the Congress designate November as Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month in order to educate

communities across the Nation about pancreatic cancer

and the need for research funding, early detection methods, effective treatments, and prevention programs: Now,

therefore, be it
3

•HCON 486 EH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress supports the goals and

3 ideals of Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month.

Passed the House of Representatives October 10,

2002.

Attest:

Clerk.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 06906

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 06906\06906_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

06906\06906_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

06906\06906_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 06906\06906_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06906\06906_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06906\06906_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06906\06906_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06906\06906_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06906\06906_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

06906\Certification Statement Plant ID 06906.pdf Plant certification statement

x 06906\Supplemental Documents\06906_Indian River_A5-3 Water Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

06906\Supplemental Documents\06906_Indian River_MAP-1 and -2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### STATE ex rel. Louis CHANSON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 88-KH-0141.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 26, 1988.

In re Chanson, Louis; applying for writ of mandamus; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 269-012.

Denied. Moot. The district court has acted.
* Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Albert J. Henderson has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c). United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. No. 94-9121.Aurelia DAVIS, as Next Friend of LaShonda D., PlaintiffAppellant,

v.

MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Aug. 1, 1996. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia (No. 94-CV-140-4 MAC (WDO)), Wilbur D. Owens, Jr., Judge.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion February 14, 1996, 11th Cir., 1996), 74 F.3d 1186) Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, and KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. *
BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be r eheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
August 20, 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

TIQUISHIA QURENA C ARROLL , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00178

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell ee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further or der this decision certified below for observance.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 396

Expressing the sense of Congress that a commemorative postage stamp should

be issued by the United States Postal Service honoring Tito Puente.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 2, 2002

Mr. RANGEL submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that a commemorative

postage stamp should be issued by the United States

Postal Service honoring Tito Puente.

Whereas Ernest Anthony Puente, Jr., nicknamed ‘‘Tito

Puente’’, was born on April 20, 1923, in East Harlem,

New York, and was one of the greatest Hispanic musicians in his field;

Whereas Tito Puente was considered a musical child prodigy

in Harlem at the age of 13;

Whereas Tito Puente served in the United States Navy and

received a Presidential commendation for being in 9 battles;
2

•HCON 396 IH

Whereas Tito Puente was a 4-time Grammy Award winner

and has participated in motion pictures and in television

programs;

Whereas Tito Puente created a scholarship foundation in

1980 to promote the arts and to help talented children,

and since then the foundation has awarded more than 50

scholarships;

Whereas Tito Puente has been awarded the Washington D.C.

Hispanic Heritage Committee Award for the Arts and

the Smithsonian Medal, in addition to other awards;

Whereas Tito Puente has recorded more than 100 songs

heard throughout the world; and

Whereas Tito Puente died on May 31, 2000, in New York

City, and will be remembered through generations as ‘‘El

Rey de los Timbales’’: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be

4 issued by the United States Postal Service honoring

5 Tito Puente; and

6 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

7 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

8 such a stamp be issued.

Æ
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, Joseph E. Robert, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of JER Investors Trust
Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of JER Investors Trust Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrants
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Joseph E. Robert, Jr.Name:

Joseph E. Robert, Jr.Title:

Chairman of the Board Chief Executive
Officer


Date: November 13, 2006
June 20, 2014

Reid J. Rosnick

Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, Mail Code 6608

Radiation Protection Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.

Washington, D.C., 20460

Via email to rosnick.reid@epa.gov

Re: Request for Extension of Comment Deadline, Docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2008

- 0218

Dear Mr. Rosnick,

Please extend the public comment period for EPA ’ s Rulemaking for Revisions to the National

Emission Stan dards for Radon Emissions from Operating Mill Tailings. Comments are due July 31,

2014, but EPA should consider extending the deadline by 120 days.

As you know, the Subpart W Rulemaking is of critical importance to affected communities

and people who li ve in Uranium Country and there is a high degree of interest in participating in the

rulemaking as well as a high degree of interest in seeing the current rule strengthened. It is also a

serious, complex rule that is difficult for lay people to grapple w ith and it takes a lengthy amount of

time to study the issues and prepare responses. A number of organizations who have a stake in the

rulemaking represent community members who lack the resources that industry has to hire technical

experts and services t o review the rule. EPA should extend the deadline by a considerable period and

accommodate the legitimate need for more time that affected citizens have in this process. This will

result in a better decision

- making process by increasing people ’ s ability t o participate.

Thank you again for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Jennifer Thurston

Director 

## INFORM

Information Network for

Responsible Mining

PO Box 27

NORWOOD, CO 81423

(970) 497

- 4482

jennifer@informcolorado.org

www.informcolorado.org
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer of GFI Group Inc.Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

** **

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of GFI Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Gooch,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

1.                 The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:November 8, 2007

 
| /s/ MICHAEL  GOOCH         |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Michael  Gooch             |   |
| *Chairman  of the Board*   |   |
| *Chief  Executive Officer* |   |

 

----
391 A.2d 674

#### Commonwealth v. Bethea, Appellant.

Argued March 14, 1978.

Nelson M. Galloway, for appellant; Marion E. Macln*586tyre, Second Assistant District Attorney, with her LeRoy S. Zimmerman, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.