T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T S UK HC HA I N S I NG H, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 73180 A ge nc yN o. A 088- 924- 867 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r24, 2013 ** B efo re: R A W L IN S O N , N . R . S M IT H , an dC H R IS T E N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S ukhc ha i n S i ngh, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of I ndi a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s appe a l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g h is ap p lic a tio n f o ra s y lu m a n dw ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence 

# FI LED SEP 27 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 73180 2 th e a g e n c y ’s f

a c tu a l f in d in g s , W

akkaryv. H

older , 55 8 F . 3d 10 49 , 10 56 (9th C i r. 2009) , and r e vi e w de novo the a ge nc y ’ s l e ga l de t e rm i na t i ons , i nc l udi ng c l a i m s of du e p ro cess v i o l at i o n s, H am azaspyan v. H

older , 5 9 0 F .3 d7 4 4 , 7 4 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e a g e n c y ’s d e te rm in a tio n th a t, e v e n if c r e d ib le , S in g h f

a ile dto e s tab lis h h e s u f f e r e dp a s t p e r s e c u tio n in I n d ia . See Na g o u lko v . I

NS , 333 F . 3d 1012, 1016- 18 ( 9th C i r . 2003) ( di s c r i m i na t i on and h a r a s s m e n t du e to r e lig io u s b e lie f s d idn o t c o m p e l f

in d in g o f p a s t p e r s e c u tio n ) . S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e a ls o s up p o rts th e a g e n c y ’s f in d in g th a t S in g h f

a ile dto est ab l i sh aw e l l - f

ounde d f e arof pe r s e c ut i on i n I ndi aon a c c ountof hi s S i kh r e lig io n , w h e r e h is S ik h p ar e n ts , b r o th e r , an ds is te rh a v e c o n tin u e dto liv e in I n d ia w ith o u t in c id e n t. Se e H a ke e m v . I

NS , 2 7 3 F . 3 d8 1 2 , 8 1 6 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 1 ) ( “ An appl i cant ’ s c l ai m of pers ec ut i on up on re turn i s w eakened, even un derc ut , w hen si m i l ar l y- si tuat ed fam i l y m em bers cont i nu e t o l i ve i n [appl i cant ’ s hom e] coun try w i tho uti nci dent [. ] ”) (i nt ernal ci t at i on om i tt ed). In addi t i on , subst ant i alevi dence s up p o rts th e a g e n c y ’s f

in d in g th a t S in g h f

a ile dto e s tab lis h an e x u s b e tw e e n h is f e a ro f th e s m u g g le ra n dap r o te c te dg r o u n d . See Zet i no v. H older , 622 F . 3d 1007, 10 15 (9th C i r. 20 10 ) ( pet i t i on erm ust“ dem on strat e thaton e of the fi ve prot ec t ed11- 73180 3 g ro u n d s w i l l b e atl easto n e cen tral reaso n fo r h i s p ersecu t i o n . ”). C o n seq u en t l y, S i n g h ’ s asyl u m cl ai m fai l s. B e c aus e S i ngh f

a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h e l i gi bi l i tyf ora s y l um , hi s w i thhol di ng of r e m o v a l c la im n e c e s s ar ilyf a ils . See Zehat

ye v. G on zales , 453 F . 3d 1182, 1190 (9th C i r. 20 06 ). W e r e je c t S in g h ’s c o n te n tio n th a t th e a g e n c yv io la te ddu e p r o c e s s in de t e rm i ni ng tha the f

a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h pa s tpe r s e c ut i on oraw e l l - f ounde d f e arof f u tu r e p e r s e c u tio n . Se e La ta v . I NS , 204 F . 3d 1241, 1246 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( r e qui r i ng e rr ora nd pr e

j udi c e t o pr e va i l on adue pr oc e s s c l a i m ) . F urthe r , the re cord do es no tsupp ortS i ng h’ s c on t ent i on s thatthe agency f ai l ed t o con si der r e le v a n t c o u n tryc o n d itio n e v id e n c e o rf a ile dto d e te rm in e h o w c ir c u m s tan c e s in I n d iaa f f e c t h is s itu a tio n . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.