alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 01900**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### 01900\01900_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook x 

### 01900\01900_Checklist.XLS EPA Completeness Review Checklist



### 01900\01900_Completeness Checklist.xls EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 01900\01900_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01900\01900_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01900\01900_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01900\01900_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01900\01900_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01900\01900_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01900\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\01900_MAP-1 Purdom 689 Site Location Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01900\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\01900_MAP-2 Purdom 689 Site Location Map Detail.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01900\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\01900_MAP-3 Purdom 689 Aerial Photo 1994.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01900\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\01900_MAP-4 Purdom 689 Site Survey Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01900\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\01900_MAP-5 Purdom 689 Aerial Photo 2009.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01900\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\01900_WB-1 Purdom 689 Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 01900\01900_Certificate Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40005

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE LUIS CASTILLO-PENALOZA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-03-CR-1374-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Luis

Castillo-Penaloza concedes that the arguments raised are

foreclosed by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for

further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance

in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED,

and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### David PEARSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-0054.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 14, 1987.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tanja Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Jr., Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Georgiria Jimenez-Orosa, Asst. Atty. Gen., West "Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Steinhorst v. State,*412 So.2d 332 (Fla.1982).

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT  99.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                          Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual Report of American Income Partners V-B Limited
Partnership  Liquidating  Trust (the "Trust"), on Form 10-K for the period ended
September  30,  2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,  the  Principal  Financial and
Accounting Officer of the Trust, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350 as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 that:

     (1)     the  Report  of  the  Trust  filed  today  fully  complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

     (2)     the  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Trust.

                    /s/  Wayne  E.  Engle
                    ---------------------
                    Wayne  E.  Engle
                    Vice  President  (Chief  Financial  Officer)
Equis  Corporation, as Manager of the Trust, under a Liquidating Trust Agreement
dated  as  of  July  18,  2002,  Wilmington  Trust  Company,  as Trustee and not
Individually

                                    March  31,  2003
[No. 35592-9-I.

Division One.

August 26, 1996.]

#### Golden International Corp., et al., *Appellants,*v. Yong Hing, Inc., et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 92-2-25504-9, Marsha J. Pechman, J., entered October 14, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Coleman, J., concurred in by Agid and Becker, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 281 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 281

Honoring the ultimate sacrifice made by Johnny Micheal Spann, the first 
     American killed in combat during the war against terrorism in 
 Afghanistan, and pledging continued support for members of the Armed 
                                Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 4, 2001

Mr. Aderholt (for himself, Mr. Goss, Mr. Wolf, Mr. Simmons, Mr. Bachus, 
  Mr. Callahan, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Everett, Mr. Hilliard, and Mr. Riley) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select)

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Honoring the ultimate sacrifice made by Johnny Micheal Spann, the first 
     American killed in combat during the war against terrorism in 
 Afghanistan, and pledging continued support for members of the Armed 
                                Forces.

Whereas as part of the war against terrorism, United States military personnel 
        and agents from the Central Intelligence Agency were involved in combat 
        with Taliban forces during a prison uprising in Mazar-e Sharif, 
        Afghanistan, on Sunday, November 25, 2001;
Whereas Johnny Micheal Spann, age 32, an officer in the Central Intelligence 
        Agency, was inside the prison fortress interviewing Taliban prisoners 
        when the uprising began;
Whereas Spann was killed in this rebellion and is the first American known to be 
        killed in combat in Afghanistan during this war;
Whereas Spann is the 79th employee of the Central Intelligence Agency killed in 
        the line of duty;
Whereas the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, George J. Tenet, hailed 
        Spann as an American hero and will soon memorialize him on a wall of 
        honor;
Whereas Spann, a former Captain in the Marine Corps, is survived by his wife, 
        Shannon, and 3 young children; and
Whereas the thoughts and prayers of the Congress and the Nation remain with the 
        families of Spann and all the soldiers fighting to ensure the Nation's 
        freedom and safety: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) honors Johnny Micheal Spann, a paramilitary officer in 
        the Central Intelligence Agency, who was the first American 
        killed in combat during the war against terrorism in 
        Afghanistan, and recognizes him for his bravery and sacrifice;
            (2) extends its deepest sympathies to the family of this 
        brave hero; and
            (3) pledges its continued support for the men and women who 
        risk their lives every day to ensure the safety of all United 
        States citizens.
                                 <all>
```
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 1925

In re: DARYL ANTHONY GREEN , Debtor

.

------------------------------------------ DARYL ANTHONY GREEN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT , Defendant

- Appellee.

No. 21

- 1927

In re: DARYL ANTHONY GREEN , Debtor

.

------------------------------------------- DARYL ATHONY GREEN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.2 PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT; PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION , Defendants

- Appellees , and
TIMOTHY BRANIGAN , Trustee.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Theodore D. Chuang , District Judge. ( 8:20

- cv - 02871

- TDC; 8:20

- cv - 03183

- TDC )

Submitted : February 24, 2022 Decided: February 28, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Daryl Anthony Green, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Hess Rohrbaugh, Assistant Attorney General, Mary Colleen Murphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Daryl Anthony Green appeal s from the district court’s order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his separate appeals from the bankruptcy court’s
orders : (1) granting his motion for a continuance, deferring action on his motion for judicial notice, and denying his motions to compel discovery and for sanctions, for entry of a default, and to reinstate his driver’s license and passport (No. 21

- 1 925 ); and (2)
dism issing his adversary proceeding without prejudice for failure to timely effectuate
service of process ( No. 21

- 1 927 ). We have reviewed the record s and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Green v. Prince George’s Cnty. Ofc. of Child Support Enf’t , Nos. 8:20

- cv - 02871

- TDC, 8:20

- cv - 03183

- TDC ( D. Md. Aug. 10, 2021 )

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and ar gument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of JER Investors Trust Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ending June 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Joseph E. Robert, Jr. , as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kari L. Doescher, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of each of their knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Joseph E. Robert, Jr.Name:

Joseph E. Robert, Jr.Title:

Chairman of the BoardChief Executive OfficerDate: August 11, 2005By:

/s/ Kari L. DoescherName:

Kari L. DoescherTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 11, 2005
Opinion filed December 13 , 2018



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________

No. 11

- 1 8

- 00 217

- CV

__________

RENE H. MOLINAR , Appellant

V.

ESTHER PATRICIA GARCIA , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2
Midland County, Texas

T rial Court Cause No. FM5843 5

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The parties have filed in this court a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. In
the motion, the parties state that they have reached an agreement regarding the merits
of this appeal and, pursuant to the terms of their settlement agreement, have agreed
that this appeal shall be dismissed. The parties request that we dismiss this appeal

and remand the cause to the trial court

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4 2.1 (a)(2)

.2 We grant t he motion and, a ccordingly, dismiss the appeal and remand the

cause to the trial court.

PER CURIAM

December 13 , 2018

Panel consists of: Bailey, C. J., Willson, J., and Wright, S.C.J. 1

Willson, J., not participating.

1 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 

### 134113 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, 

### MICHAEL SCHILS, Justices 

### Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 134113 COA: 274664 Washtenaw CC: 06-000262-CZ WASHTENAW COMMUNITY HEALTH ORGANIZATION, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 15, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

d0917 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 24, 2007

Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KAMIL BROWN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 426 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of April, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Docket No: FAA - 2014 - 3986 Dir ID: 2015 - NM - 057 - AD
Frorn:NORTH CENTRAL WV AIRPORT 304 8420825 05/27/2010 15:34 tt576 P.001/011 

E..yCom..E..yGo.' F^iff PURPORT 

Owned and operated by the Banadum Airport Authority 

M M B NORTH CeNTAnL lUeST VIRGINIfl 

May 27, 2010 

VIA EMAIL TO: eas.oov and ^ 

FAX (202) 336-7638 

Dennis J. DeVany, Chief 

Essential Air Service Division X-53 

OfTice of Aviation Analysis 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Sir: 

By letter dated the 19*^ day of May, 2010. comments based upon 

the consensus of the Board of the Benedum Airport Authority, owner and 

operator of the North Central West Virginia Airport serving Clarksburg/Fairmont, 

(CKB), were provided to you recommending that service to CKB be provided by 

Gulfstream Intemational serving only CKB with flights to Cleveland in 

accordance with one of Gulfstream's proposals. I believe you were later 

advised that the Board wished to reconsider its comments and at a special 

meeting held on May 26, 2010, the Board heard presentations from both 

Colgan and Gulfstream and after due and proper consideration of the 

proposals, the Board determined that service most beneficial to the area served 

by CKB would be continuation of Colgan service to Dulles, if and only if, two 

direct flights from CKB to and from Dulles Airport were provided on a daily 

basis, with one such flight returning from Dulles to CKB in the 5:30 to 7:00 time 

frame. If such service scheduled as above cannot be provided by Colgan then 

it Is the recommendation of the Board that service by Gulfstream serving only 

CKB be provided to Cleveland in accordance with one of Gulfstream's 

proposals. 

We hope that you will consider the recommendation and 

comments of the Board in making your decision with respect to EAS service to 

CKB. 

2000 Aviation Way I Bridgeport, WV 26330 I 304.842.3400 I FAX: 304.642,0825 flyGkb.eem 
From:NORTH CENTRAL WV AIRPORT 304 8420825 05/27/2010 15:35 11576 P. 002/011 

Easy Com*. Easy Go! 

1 

m NORTH C€NTflfiL UJ€ST VlflGINIfl 

filRPORT 

Owned and operated by the Benedum Airport Authority 

Dennis J. DeVany 

Page 2 

May 27, 2010 

Thank you for your assistance in this regard. 

Very truly yours, 

Richard B. Rock, 

Interim Director 

200 0 Aviatio n Way I Bridgeport , WV 2633 0 I 304.S42.3400 I FAX: 304.842.062 5 flyekb.co m
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHAN DRAJAT,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-71418

Agency No. A096-361-909

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 10, 2013** 

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Johan Drajat, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

FILED

JUN 14 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-71418

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

factual findings, Tekle v. Mukasey, 533 F.3d 1044, 1051 (9th Cir. 2008), and we

review de novo due process claims, Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105,

1107 (9th Cir. 2003). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on inconsistencies within Drajat’s testimony and between his testimony and

declaration regarding his report to the police of the attempted poisoning, including

whether any report was made at all. See Kohli v. Gonzales, 473 F.3d 1061, 1071

(9th Cir. 2007) (discrepancies between testimony and declaration supported the

adverse credibility determination); Rivera v. Mukasey, 508 F.3d 1271, 1275 (9th

Cir. 2007) (inconsistencies regarding details of incident that went to the heart of

the claim deprived the claim of “the ring of truth.”). In the absence of credible

testimony, Drajat’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v.

Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003). 

Because Drajat’s CAT claim is based on the same testimony the agency

found not credible, and he points to no other evidence showing it is more likely

than not he will be tortured if returned to Indonesia, his CAT claim also fails. See

id. at 1156-57. 
3 11-71418

Finally, the BIA did not err in concluding that the IJ’s use of a transcript of

the earlier hearings did not violate Drajat’s due process rights. See Lata v. INS,

204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (petitioner must show error and prejudice to

establish a due process violation).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
----

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 1.     | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|   | 2.     | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of the dates and for the periods covered by the  report. |

| May      15, 2009 |                                                  |   |
|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|              |                                                  |   |
|              | /s/      Robert J. Halloran, Jr.                      |   |
|              | Robert      J. Halloran, Jr.                          |   |
|              | President,      Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |
[No. 14426-7-III.

Division Three.

August 1, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Robert Joseph Bogner, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Benton County, No. 94-1-00371-6, Carolyn A. Brown, J., entered October 28, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, A.C.J., concurred in by Munson and Thompson, JJ.
391 A.2d 708

#### Gallagher et al., Appellants. v. Garnish et al.

Appeal quashed.

JACOBS, P. J., WATKINS, former P. J., and PRICE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section**  **1350,
      as Adopted**


**Pursuant
      to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Buffets Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-K for the year ended June 27, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, A. Keith Wall, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/
                A. Keith WallA.
                Keith WallChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)November
                5, 2007





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**INTERLINE BRANDS, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Interline Brands, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John A. Ebner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /S/   JOHN A. EBNER       |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| John   A. Ebner           |   |
| Chief   Financial Officer |   |
| May 8,   2012        |   |

 

----