alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS

                                                               EXHIBIT 31.1/31.2

      I, Massimiliano Pozzoni, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Ameriprint
International Ltd.

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have;

      (a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
      ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered
      by this quarterly report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5.    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

      (a)   All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

      Date: March 16, 2006            /s/ Massimiliano Pozzoni
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Massimiliano Pozzoni
                                      Principal Executive and Financial Officer
#### Ivory T. ROBINSON v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 58513.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

June 3, 1988.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 17, 1988.

Ivory T. Robinson, pro se.

Edwin Lloyd Pittman and Mike Moore, Attys. Gen. by John R. Henry, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Grenada County; Clarence E. Morgan, Jr., Judge.

Before HAWKINS, P.J., and ROBERTSON and ZUCCARO, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
*

Honorable Anthony A. Alaimo, Senior U.S. District Judge for

the Southern District of Georgia, sitting by designation. 

United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

No. 94-2300.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Charles S. CANCELLIERE, Defendant-Appellant.

Feb. 2, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of Florida (No. 93-213-CR-T-21C), Ralph W. Nimmons, Jr.,

Judge.

Before BLACK, Circuit Judge, HILL, Senior Circuit Judge, and

ALAIMO*

, Senior District Judge.

BY THE COURT:

Appellant's "motion for rehearing/clarification," construed as

a motion to clarify this Court's opinion, is GRANTED. The judgment

is amended by adding: "This case is REMANDED to the district court

for further proceedings consistent herewith."
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I, Jibin
      Zhang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      Vorsatech Ventures, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30,
      2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
      condition and results of operations of Vorsatech Ventures, Inc.






August
                22, 2005/s/ Jibin
                  ZhangName: Jibin
                ZhangTitle:  
                  Chief Financial Officer
 
 29
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. 1350



(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the Annual Report
of Games & Esports Experience Acquisition Corp (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Ari Segal, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                     |     |                                                       
|-------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2022 | By: | /s/ Ari Segal                                         
|                     |     | Ari Segal                                             
|                     |     | Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 10.1
  J. Michael Schroeder
    
    Hand Delivered818 Hidden Cave RoadMiddleton, WI 53562
 RE:
    
    Confidential Separation Agreement and Release (Agreement)
  Company Separation Date
 Pay and Benefits




---



##### 



Your Undertakings




---



##### 



Released Parties




---



##### 



Acceptance and Revocation Procedures
 on or before 5:00 p.m.
Central time on March 10, 2011.
 (B) You agree and acknowledge that you have been advised by the Company to consult with an
attorney prior to signing this Agreement;
 (C) You understand that this Agreement, at Paragraph 2(A), above, includes a final general
release, including a release of all claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act that
arise before the date of this Agreement;
 (D) You understand that this Agreement, at Paragraph 2(A) above, includes a final general
release, including a release of any and all claims for unlawful retaliation against the Company
that exist as of the date of this Agreement;




---



##### 



Consideration
Period
 Revocation Period
   Miscellaneous




---



##### 








---



##### 



Very truly yours,
GREAT WOLF RESORTS, INC.By:
    /s/ Kimberly K. SchaeferKimberly K. Schaefer, CEOOn behalf of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc.   /s/ J. Michael SchroederJ. Michael Schroeder
REGISTRATION

66330

- 334

Vol.2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEANETTE K. LANSBURG; LARRY J. ENCINAS, husband and wife,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v.

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION; SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 13

- 15545

D.C. No. 2:11

- cv

- 01529

- HRH

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona H. Russel Holland, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 9, 2015 **

San Francisco, California

Before: SILVERMAN, GOULD, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Jeanette K. Lansburg and Larry J. Encinas (“Plaintiffs”) appeal a summary

judgment entered by the district court on their contract claims against Saxon

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 12 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K
U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

Mortgage Services, Inc. a nd the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291; we vacate and remand.

1. Plaintiffs contend that they entered into a Trial Period Plan (“TPP”) with

Saxon’s predecessor

- in

- interest that promised a n eventual permanent loan

modification

, that they complied with the terms of the TPP, but that Saxon

nonetheless refused to permanently modify the loan and foreclosed on their home.

The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants, finding that the TPP

did “not guarantee that the lender will provide the borrower with a loan modification

agreement even if the bor rower” complied with its terms.

2. In Corvello v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA , which involved claims similar to

those here, we held that a lender may be contractually obligated to offer a permanent

loan modification if the borrower complies with the terms of a TPP. 728 F.3d 878,

883

– 85 (9th Cir. 2013). Because the district court did not have the benefit of our

later opinion when it granted summary jud gment in this case, we vacate th e

judgment and remand for reconsideration of plaintiffs’ claims in light of Corvello

.

VACATED AND REMANDED ; e ach party shall bear its own costs

.
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute 

controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in 

accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3) of the North Carolina Rules of 

Appellate Procedure.

NO. COA14-294

NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS

Filed: 15 July 2014

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

v. Beaufort County

No. 11 CRS 52674

ROBERT CHRISTOPHER FIGGS

On writ of certiorari to review judgments entered 26 

February 2013 by Judge Wayland J. Sermons, Jr., in Beaufort

County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 30 June 

2014.

Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General 

Sherri Horner Lawrence, for the State.

Craig M. Cooley for defendant-appellant.

BRYANT, Judge.

Where a review of the record pursuant to Anders reveals no 

prejudicial error in defendant’s appeal, we find no error in the 

judgment of the trial court.

Defendant Robert Christopher Figgs seeks review of

judgments entered 26 February 2013 upon guilty verdicts to 
-2-

statutory rape and taking indecent liberties with a child. The 

trial court sentenced defendant to consecutive terms of 317 to 

390 and 21 to 26 months imprisonment for his respective 

convictions. On 12 December 2013, this Court issued a writ of 

certiorari to review defendant’s judgments.

________________________________

Counsel appointed to represent defendant has been unable to 

identify any issue with sufficient merit to support a meaningful 

argument for relief on appeal and asks that this Court conduct 

its own review of the record for possible prejudicial error. 

Counsel has also shown to the satisfaction of this Court that he 

has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Kinch, 314 N.C. 99, 331 S.E.2d 665 

(1985), by advising defendant of his right to file written 

arguments with this Court and providing him with the documents 

necessary for him to do so. 

Defendant has not filed any written arguments on his own 

behalf with this Court and a reasonable time in which he could 

have done so has passed. In accordance with Anders, we have 

fully examined the record to determine whether any issues of 

arguable merit appear therefrom. We have been unable to find 
-3-

any possible prejudicial error and conclude that the appeal is 

wholly frivolous.

No error.

Judges STROUD and HUNTER, Robert N., Jr., concur.

Report per Rule 30(e).
391 A.2d 686

#### Commonwealth v. James Otha Johnson, Appellant.

*609Judgment of sentence affirmed.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rand Logistics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2007 (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: November 13, 2007


                                                /s/ Laurence S. Levy
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Laurence S. Levy
                                                Chairman of the Board and
                                                Chief Executive Officer
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause Number: 01

- 14

- 00207

- CV

Trial Court Cause

Number: 2013

- 45235A

Style: Ellen Lumenta , Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Roy Revelino

Nawawi, Deceased

v Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., Bell Helicopter Korea Inc., Bell Helicopter Corporation,

Bell Helicopter International Inc., Bell Helicopter International Sale s Corporation, Pratt &

Whitney and United Technologies Corporation

Date motion filed * : April 3, 2015

Type of motion: Motion to Include in the Record the Deposition of Harold Barrentine and the Record of

the Hearing Transcript of December 16, 2013 Hearing

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Motion

Is appeal accelerated? YES NO

Ordered that motion is:

Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

Denied

Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

Other: Dismissed in part because the record of t he December 16, 2013 hearing is already on file in the

appeal. Denied in part because the record does not reflect that the Deposition of Harold Barrentine was

before the trial court at the time it ruled on the motion to dismis s for forum non conveniens. See I n re

Hardwick

, 426 S.W.3d 151, 158 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2012 , orig. proceeding ) (noting scope of

review limited to record before trial court at time of ruling).

Judge's signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of

Date: April 1 4 , 2015

### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 574 

Designating July 13, 2018, as Collector Car Appreciation Day and recognizing 

that the collection and restoration of historic and classic cars is an 

important part of preserving the technological achievements and cultural 

heritage of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 12, 2018 

Mr. BURR (for himself and Mr. TESTER) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating July 13, 2018, as Collector Car Appreciation 

Day and recognizing that the collection and restoration 

of historic and classic cars is an important part of preserving the technological achievements and cultural heritage of the United States. 

Whereas many people in the United States maintain classic 

automobiles as a pastime and do so with great passion 

and as a means of individual expression; 

Whereas the Senate recognizes the effect that the more than 

100-year history of the automobile has had on the economic progress of the United States and supports wholeheartedly all activities involved in the restoration and exhibition of classic automobiles; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 574 ATS 

Whereas the collection, restoration, and preservation of automobiles is an activity shared across generations and 

across all segments of society; 

Whereas thousands of local car clubs and related businesses 

have been instrumental in preserving a historic part of 

the heritage of the United States by encouraging the restoration and exhibition of such vintage works of art; 

Whereas automotive restoration provides well-paying, highskilled jobs for people in all 50 States; and 

Whereas automobiles have provided the inspiration for music, 

photography, cinema, fashion, and other artistic pursuits 

that have become part of the popular culture of the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates July 13, 2018, as ‘‘Collector Car 

3 Appreciation Day’’; 

4 (2) recognizes that the collection and restora5 tion of historic and classic cars is an important part 

6 of preserving the technological achievements and cul7 tural heritage of the United States; and 

8 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to engage in events and commemorations of Col10 lector Car Appreciation Day that create opportuni11 ties for collector car owners to educate young people 

12 about the importance of preserving the cultural her13 itage of the United States, including through the 

14 collection and restoration of collector cars. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
the third day o January, two thousand and one

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used

at any time on September 12, 2001, for a prayer vigil in memory

of those who lost their lives in the events of September 11, 2001.

Physical preparations for the vigil shall be carried out in accordance

with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
Exhibit 18.1



| |                         | New York Office | 
| | ----------------------- | --------------- | 
| | 7 Penn Plaza, Suite 830
| | New York, NY 10001     
| | T 212.279.7900         



Preferability Letter



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
A SPAC I Acquisition Corp.

Level 39, Marina Bay Financial Centre

Tower 2

10 Marina Boulevard, Singapore 018983



We have audited the financial statements includedin
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 and issued our report thereon dated April 14, 2022.
Note 2to the financial statements describes a change in accounting principle for measuring class A ordinary shares subject
to possible redemption. Under the new principle, subsequently in March 2022, the Company will accrete the changes in the redemption value
over the period from the date of issuance (or from the date that it becomes probable that the instrument will become redeemable, if later)
to the earliest redemption date of the instrument. The Company states that the accounting change complies with accounting and disclosure
requirements of ASC 250 “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections” which requires that an entity may voluntarily change an
accounting principle only if it justifies the use of an allowable alternative accounting principle on the basis that it is preferable
and meets criteria such as authoritative support, rationality and industry practice. The Company will adopt the accretion method starting
its first quarter ending March 31, 2022. Based on our reading of management’s stated reasons and justification for this change in
accounting principle in the Form 10-K, and our discussions with management as to their judgment about the relevant business planning factors
relating to the change, we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting is preferable in the Company’s circumstances.



Very truly yours,



/s/ Marcum Bernstein & Pinchuk LLP



Marcum Bernstein & Pinchuk LLP



April 14, 2022









www.marcumbp.com
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 17
- 00665
- CV

In the Matter of C. Z.

FROM THE 98TH DISTRI CT COURT OF TRAVIS C OUNTY NO. J
- 31770, THE HON ORABLE RHONDA HURLEY , JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

The reporter’s record in t his appeal was originally due to be filed on October 23,
2017. To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed.

The Family Code accelerate s the final disposition of an appeal from a juvenile court’s order waiving jurisdiction and transferring the chi ld to distr ict court for prosecution as

an adult

. See Tex. Fam. Code §§ 54.02 (providing for waiver of jurisdiction and discretionary transfer to criminal court), 56.01(c)(1)(B) (providing for immediate appeal of transfer order under section 54.02 of the Family Code); Order Accelerating Juvenile Certification Appeals and Requiring Juvenile Courts to Give Notice of the Right to an Immediate Appeal , Misc. Docket No. 15

- 9156 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015) ( “[p]ending the adoption of rules,” appellate courts shall ensur e that appeals of certification orders are brought to final disposition within 180 days ). The accelerated schedule requ ires greater compliance with deadlines. Therefore , Patricia A. Day is hereby ordered to file the reporter’s record in this case on or b efore November 13 , 2017. If therecord is not filed by that date, Day may be required to show cause why she should not be held in

contempt of court.

It is ordered on November 3, 2017.

Before Justices Puryear, Field, and Bourland
Citations and pin cites are based on the Westlaw online version of the cited material. 

### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON
, Respondent
,

v.

BRIAN KEITH MOSES, JR.
, Appellant

. No

. 81016

- 2

- I

DIVISION ONE

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

C OBURN , J

. — Brian Keith Moses Jr. appeal ed his conviction for the crime

of possession of methamphetamine under RCW 69.50.4013

. While Moses’s appeal was pending before this court, our Supreme Court

determin ed RCW 69.50.4013 , Washington’s strict liability drug possession
statute, is void for violating the due process clauses of the state and federal
constitutions because it criminalized unintentional, unknowing possession of

controlled substances

. See State v. Blake , No. 968 73

- 0, slip op. at 29

- 30 (Wash.
Feb. 25, 2021), http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/968730.pdf

. Following the Blake decision, Moses filed a motion in lieu of supplemental
briefing requesting we reverse his conviction pursuant to Blake

. The State filed a
response conceding that this court shoul d reverse and remand Moses’s

conviction

. We accept the State’s concession.No. 81016

- 2

- I/ 2

2 W e reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with the Blake

decision

.

WE CONCUR: