alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 A0 71 9 . TROI KA ENTERTAI NMENT, LLC et a l . v . SHARI MENDEZ

.

In t h is p ers on al i n

ju ry act i o n , Sh ari M en dez s u ed T ro i k a En t ert ai n m en t Gro u p,
In c., Tro i k a En t ert ai n m ent, L L C
, a nd T r o ika E n te r t ai n m en t , In c. (co l l ect i v el y “ Tro i k a
En t ert ai nm en t ”) fo r d am ag es

. Tro i k a En t ert ai n m en t fai l ed t o fi l e a t i m el y an s wer, an d

M en d ez m o ved f

o r e nt ry o f d efau l t ju d g m en t

. Th e tri al co u rt g ran t ed Men d ez’ s

m o ti o n , h el d a heari n g o n d a m a g e s , an d o n No v em b er 1
, 2 0 1 9
, en t ered i t s “ Fi n al
J u d g m en t an d J u dg m en t Ag ai n s t Tro i k a Part ies ,” i n wh i ch i t awa r d e d M e n dez $ 5 0 0 ,0 0 0 i n d am ag es

. On Feb ru ary 2 8
, 2 02 0
, Tro i k a En t ert ai n m en t fi l ed i t s “ M o t i o n

t o O p en Defau l t an d
, i n t h e A l t ern at i v e, M ot i o n to Set As i d e t h e J u d g m en t

. ” Th e t ri al

co u rt d en i ed t h e m o t i o n , an d Tro i k a En t ert ai n m en t fi l ed t h i s d i rect ap p eal

. W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s di ct i o n.
B e c a u s e Tr o i k a E n t e r t a i n m e n t ’s m o t i o n w a s fi led aft er fi n al ju d gm e n t w a s

en t ered in t h is cas e, “ t h e p ro ced u res o f OCGA § 9-1 1 -5 5 (b ) were i n ap p l i cab l e, an d
OCGA § 9 -1 1 -6 0 (d ) ap p l i es .” C o n s eco F in an ce Ser vi ci n g Co r

p. v. Hi l l
, 2 5 2 Ga. Ap p

. 7 7 4
, 7 8 0 (7 ) (5 5 6 SE2 d 46 8 ) (2 0 0 1 ). Tro i k a En t ert ai n m en t w as au th o ri zed to

s eek t o hav e t h e d efau lt j u d gm en t s et as i d e u n d er OCGA § 9 -1 1 -6 0 (d ), b u t an ap p eal
fro m an o rd er d en y i n g a m o ti o n t o s et as i de un d er th i s Co d e s ect i o n m u s t b e t ak en by

ap p li cat io n fo r d i s cret i o n ary rev i ew. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (8 ); Ji m El l i s At l a n t a, In c. v. Ad a ms o n , 2 8 3 G a. A p p. 1 1 6
, 1 1 6 (6 4 0 SE2 d 6 88 ) (2 0 0 6 ). “ Co m p l i an ce wi th

t h e di s cret io n ary ap p eal s p ro ced u re i s ju ri s d i ct i on al .” S mo a k v. Dep t

. of Hu ma n Res o u r ces , 2 2 1 Ga. Ap p

. 2 5 7
, 2 5 7 (4 7 1 SE2 d 6 0 ) ( 19 9 6 ). Tro i ka E n t ert ai n m en t ’ s fai l u re t o fo l l ow t h e req u i red ap p el l at e p ro ced u re dep ri v es u s o f ju ri s di ct io n o v er t h i s d i rect ap p eal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED. December 16, 2020C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 12/16/2020
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 3, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20014-20015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7956]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

State Energy Advisory Board (STEAB)

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of 
Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 20015]]

SUMMARY: This notice announces a teleconference call of the State 
Energy Advisory Board (STEAB). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. 
L. 92-463; 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these meetings 
be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Thursday, April 19, 2012; 3:30 p.m.-4 p.m. (EST).
    To receive the call-in number and passcode, please contact the 
Board's Designated Federal Officer (DFO) at the address or phone number 
listed below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gil Sperling, STEAB Designated Federal 
Officer, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and 
Renewable Energy, 1000 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20585. 
Phone number is (202) 287-1644.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: To provide advice and recommendations to the 
Assistant Secretary for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable 
Energy (EERE) regarding goals and objectives, programmatic and 
administrative policies, and to otherwise carry out the Board's 
responsibilities as designated in the State Energy Efficiency Programs 
Improvement Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-440).
    Tentative Agenda: Conduct follow-up business from the March 13-15, 
2012 meeting, update the Board on the activities of the STEAB's Task 
Forces since the March meeting, and provide an update to the Board on 
routine business matters and other topics of interest.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral statements 
pertaining to agenda items should contact Gil Sperling at the address 
or telephone number listed above. Requests to make oral comments must 
be received five days prior to the meeting; reasonable provision will 
be made to include requested topic(s) on the agenda. The Chair of the 
Board is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business.
    Minutes: The minutes of the meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 60 days on the STEAB web site at 
www.steab.org.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on March 28, 2012.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-7956 Filed 4-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
1

Ogulei, David

From: Ogulei, David

Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 4:44 PM

To: Paddock, Nancy

Cc: Dennis Warchol

Subject: RE: Title V Request regarding material processing areas and emissions calculations

Hi Nancy, 

As stated in your email below, the emissions comparison shown in the table below is for one calendar year. Which 

year is this? Do you have emissions data for more than one calendar year that show what the difference in 

emissions between the two methods is? The email says you looked at 5 years of TRI data. 

Thanks, 

David 

From: Paddock, Nancy [mailto:nancy.paddock@veolia.com] 

Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 1:43 PM 

To: Ogulei, David 

Cc: Dennis Warchol 

Subject: Title V Request regarding material processing areas and emissions calculations 

Hello David, 

Section 2.2(E)(3) of TWI's 2008 Title V permit states that the TANKS program must be used to calculate

emissions from MP1, MP2 and LPR. 

Last year, a consultant reviewed our emissions inventory process. The Surface Evaporation Model from EPA 

Guidance EIIP Volume II:Chapter 8 Section 4.1.4. Preferred and Alternative Methods for Estimating Air Emissions from Paint 

and Ink Manufacturing Facilities, March 1998. Equation 8.4-18 was used to calculate emissions from MP1, MP2 and 

LPR. The consultant compiled an average of 5 years of the most recent TRI concentration data to determine the 

concentration of VOC and HAP in the waste, which was then used in the EPA Surface Evaporation Model 

referenced above. 

TANKS is based on routine displacement of liquids. The surface evaporation model is based on the volatility 

and ability of a compound to evaporate from the surface of solids and then be picked up by the air in the 

building and carried to the atmosphere. The evaporation method seems to be more appropriate for MP1, MP2 

and LPR; TWI would like to change section 2.2(E)(3) of the upcoming permit (or the equivalent section

thereof) to indicate the Surface Evaporation Model will be used to calculate emissions from these sources. 

This table compares emissions calculated by both methods for the same calendar year: 

TANKS Model Evaporative 

model 

area TPY lb TPY lb 

MP-1 0.06 117 0.21 424 

MP-2 0.02 44 0.11 212 

LABPACK/REPACK 0.03 68 0.04 85 
2

I hope this makes sense. Please let me know if you have questions. 

Thank you, 

Nancy 

Nancy Paddock 

Environmental Engineering Specialist 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. 

7 Mobile Avenue 

Sauget, IL 62201 

618.271.2804 (x-115) 

618.271.2128 (fax) 

 

Please note that my e-mail address has changed:

Nancy.Paddock@Veolia.com

 

This e-mail message from Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. is for the sole use of the intended 

recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, 

disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please communicate 

with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message and delete it from all 

computers.
[No. 18086-3-II.

Division Two.

July 12, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Mark J. Toppano, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Mason County, No. 93-1-00149-5, James B. Sawyer II, J., entered January 20, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Turner, J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Armstrong, JJ.
IV 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 504

Congratulating the PONY League baseball team of Norwalk, California, for 

winning the 2002 PONY League World Championship. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2002

Mrs. NAPOLITANO submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the PONY League baseball team of Norwalk, 

California, for winning the 2002 PONY League World 

Championship.

Whereas the Protecting Our Nation’s Youth (PONY) Organization sponsors various baseball and softball leagues for 

young people throughout the world, including the PONY 

League for 13- and 14-year-olds; 

Whereas the PONY League baseball team of Norwalk, California, won the 2002 PONY League World Championship held in Washington, Pennsylvania, on August 24, 

2002; 

Whereas, in order to win the World Championship Title, the 

Norwalk team defeated the PONY League baseball team 

of Washington, Pennsylvania, by a score of 11 to 7, the 

PONY League baseball team of Hagerstown, Maryland, 
2

•HCON 504 IH 

by a score of 11 to 0, the PONY League baseball team 

of Port Neches, Texas, by a score of 11 to 4, and, finally, 

the PONY League baseball team of Levittown, Puerto 

Rico, by a score of 10 to 0; 

Whereas the Norwalk team is the third team from California 

during the last 6 years to win the PONY League World 

Championship; 

Whereas the Norwalk team’s success would not have been 

possible without the support of the players’ parents; volunteer manager, Ruben Velazquez; and volunteer coaches, George Sanchez and Tony Riveras; 

Whereas each of the athletes on the Norwalk team—Art Gonzalez, Jimmy Buentello, Frankie Lucero, Johnny Perez, 

Gabriel Schwulst, Danny Dutch, Miguel Flores, Jesus 

Cabral, Tony Zarco, Jamil Acosta, Eddie Murray, George 

Sanchez, Richard Melendrez, Anthony Topete, and Victor 

Sanchez—devoted a great deal of time and effort to the 

practices that led to the World Championship victory; 

and 

Whereas the PONY League provides young people throughout the world an opportunity to enjoy the competitive 

sport of baseball, build character, and learn important 

skills such as teamwork: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress—

3 (1) congratulates the PONY League baseball 

4 team of Norwalk, California, for winning the 2002 

5 PONY League World Championship; 

6 (2) recognizes the parents of the team’s players 

7 and the team’s volunteer manager and coaches for 
3

•HCON 504 IH 

1 providing the support which made the team’s victory 

2 possible; and 

3 (3) recognizes the Protecting Our Nation’s 

4 Youth (PONY) Organization for providing safe rec5 reational opportunities for young people and an op6 portunity for young athletes to become positive role 

7 models for other youth.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-761]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Face-to-Face Service 
Methods Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Face-to-Face 
Service Methods Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 14, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Powers at 1-(888) 912-1227 or 
(954) 423-7977.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Face-to-Face Service 
Methods Project Committee will be held Tuesday, February 14, 2012, at 2 
p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to 
make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due 
to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must 
be made with Donna Powers. For more information please contact Ms. 
Powers at 1-(888) 912-1227 or (954) 423-7977, or write TAP Office, 1000 
South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or contact us 
at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS Issues.

    Dated: January 11, 2012.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2012-761 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Donna K. WIMBERLY, Appellant, v. Polly E. BUFORD, Appellee.

No. 56042.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

March 15, 1983.

Joe S. Rolston III, Oklahoma City, for appellant.

Porta, Bass & Bass, P.C., El Reno, for appellee.

DOOLIN, Justice:

Jurisdiction assumed; let certiorari issue to the Court of Appeals, Temporary Division 113.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals Temporary Division 113 is hereby vacated, for a Court of Appeals may not overrule an opinion of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma. Rule 3.13 A(4), 12 O.S.1981, Chap. 15, App. 3.

This Court is further of the opinion that *Sudheimer v. Cheatam,*443 P.2d 951 (Okl.1968) is distinguishable in fact from and therefore not in conflict with *Leach v. West,*504 P.2d 1233, 1237 (Okl.1972), and should not be overruled.

*Leach v. West,*supra, is dispositive.

*1051CERTIORARI GRANTED; COURT OF APPEALS’ OPINION VACATED; TRIAL COURT’S JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

All the Justices concur.
Gulf Islands National Seashore

Birds

The diversity of wildlife habitats including beaches, dunes, freshwater marshes, maritime 

forests, and salt marshes has attracted over 300 species of birds. Gulf Islands National 

Seashore is part of the Great Florida Birding Trail.

From pine warblers to pelicans, you'll find them here. Gulf Islands is a stopover for migrating 

birds, a place where they can rest and feed before continuing on their migration. The 

freshwater marsh areas provide shelter for clapper rails and spotted sandpipers. A diversity of 

gulls, terns and various shorebirds can be found year-round.

So grab your binoculars and keep your eyes peeled. You never know what you may find!

Did You Know?

Gulf Islands National Seashore's barrier island habitats, offshore waters, 

and submerged resources offer a variety of recreational opportunities for 

people year-round. 

Gulf Islands National Seashore - Birds (U.S. National Park Service) Page 1 of 2

http://www.nps.gov/guis/naturescience/birds.htm 8/17/2011
Last Updated: March 01, 2007 at 15:28 MST

Gulf Islands National Seashore - Birds (U.S. National Park Service) Page 2 of 2

http://www.nps.gov/guis/naturescience/birds.htm 8/17/2011
Amarillo Grain Exchange, Inc.

1300 S. Johnson, Amarillo, TX 79101 Highway 54 N.E., Guymon, OK 73942

Phone: (806) 372-8511, Fax: (806) 372-2152 Phone: (580) 338-5816, Fax: (580) 338-5817

AMA FEE SCHEDULE

Services Performed under Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946

Hourly Rates 

Service Service Description Billing Rate

Commodity Inspection: 

Regular Hourly Rate Monday – Friday $30.72/ Hour 

Saturday $46.08/Hour 

Sunday, and Holidays $61.44/ Hour 

Graded Commodities (Beans, Peas, Lentils, and Pulses)

Unit Rates:

 (i) Grade (per lot or sample) $12.96/ Test

 (ii) Factor Analysis (per factor) $5.76/ Factor

Non-graded, Non-processed Commodities (Popcorn, Confectionary sunflower)

Unit Rates: 

 (i) Factor Analysis (per factor) $5.76/ Factor

 (ii) Aflatoxin $32.64/ Test

Stowage Examination (service on request) 

Unit Rates:

 All carriers (per examination) $14.40 

Travel (airfare, per diem, etc.) Actual Cost

Extra Copies of Certificates/Faxing (per page) $1.50 

Mileage Charge: (per mile) The IRS 

Standard Mileage Rate will be assessed for all services performed outside the service point city’s limit. Any charge to the 

mileage rate is effective when the IRS changes their standard mileage rate.

“Commodity Cooperative Service Agreement Fees. In addition to all other 

applicable fees, commodity cooperative service agreement fees for 

commodity inspection services (pulses, hops, and miscellaneous processed 

commodities), excluding rice, will be assessed at the current percentage 

rate identified in FGIS Directive 9180.74 (Service Fees and Billing Codes, 

Attachment 4.) The assessed fees must exclude travel, mailing expenses, 

and state and local taxes. Invoices will identify assessed commodity 

cooperative service agreement fees as separate line items.”

January 1, 2024

[1]
Beacon 520SD, Beacon 520SDX

Com plex strontium aluminate, rare earth doped
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Rand Logistics, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2009 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      November 12, 2009
            
            /s/ Laurence S. LevyLaurence
      S. LevyChairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 93 Agreed to House (ATH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 93

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives 
         and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2001

  Mr. Oxley submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives 
         and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Wednesday, April 
4, 2001, or Thursday, April 5, 2001, on a motion offered pursuant to 
this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 
stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, April 24, 2001, or until noon 
on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and 
that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Friday, April 6, 2001, Saturday, April 7, 2001, Sunday, April 8, 2001, 
or Monday, April 9, 2001, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, April 23, 2001, or until 
such time on that day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his 
designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the 
second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 
2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40597

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MIGUEL ORTIZ HINOJO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:12-CR-1133-1

Before PRADO, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Miguel Ortiz Hinojo appeals the 30-month within-guidelines sentence 

imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after 

deportation. On appeal, Ortiz Hinojo argues that the district court erred by 

failing to award him an additional one-level reduction for acceptance of 

responsibility pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b), because the additional 

reduction cannot be withheld based on a defendant’s refusal to waive his 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 28, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40597 Document: 00512749405 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/28/2014
No. 13-40597

appellate rights. The Government concedes error in the district court’s failure 

to award the additional one-level reduction but argues that the error was 

harmless.

Amendment 775 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which 

became effective November 1, 2013, provides that the Government should not 

withhold the additional one-level reduction under § 3E1.1(b) based on interests 

not identified in the guideline, such as whether the defendant agrees to waive 

the right to appeal. U.S.S.G. Manual, Supp. to App. C, Amendment 775, at 43-

46 (2013). In United States v. Villegas Palacios, __ F.3d __, No. 13-40153, 2014 

WL 2119096, at *1 (5th Cir. May 21, 2014), we applied Amendment 775 to a 

case on direct appeal in which the error was preserved and the Government 

conceded error. 

In light of the amendment to § 3E1.1, the holding in Villegas Palacios, 

and the Government’s concession of error in the instant case, the district 

court’s refusal to award Ortiz Hinojo the additional one-level for acceptance of 

responsibility was procedural error. See Villegas Palacios, 2014 WL 2119096, 

1. The Government has not shown that this error was harmless. See United 

States v. Delgado-Martinez, 564 F.3d 750, 752-53 (5th Cir. 2009).

Accordingly, Ortiz Hinojo’s sentence is VACATED and the case is 

REMANDED to the district court for resentencing consistent with this opinion. 

2

 Case: 13-40597 Document: 00512749405 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/28/2014