alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Abington Community Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Robert W. White, Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Company.


                                                /s/ Robert W. White
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Robert W. White
                                                Chairman, President and
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                November 14, 2005




        A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ABINGTON COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC. AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY ABINGTON COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

  

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer ofNew Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1,2021 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC andCNH Equipment Trust 2021-C does hereby certify that:

 

1.            NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.            The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate tothe Indenture Trustee.

 

3.            This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.            A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2022 and of its performanceunder the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreementin all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2022.

 

6.            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 30th day of March, 2023.

 

 

 

March 30, 2023
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

GMH COMMUNITIES TRUST

 

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY

RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

I,J. Patrick O’Grady, acting in the capacity of Principal Financial Officer ofGMH Communities Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the “Company”),hereby certify that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

*        *        *

 

 
| /s/ J. Patrick O’Grady                                                         |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| J. Patrick O’Grady                                                             |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal  Financial Officer) |
|                                                                                |
|                                                                                |
| Date: September 15, 2006                                                       |

 

----
[No. 33092-6-I.

Division One.

June 3, 1996.]

#### John McKay, *Appellant,*v. Robyn Ricks, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 89-5-02810-8, Larry A. Jordan, J., entered June 16, 1993. *Remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 11, 2019

No. 04-19-00386-CR

Kelly Elaine COURVELLE

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6404

Honorable Kirsten Cohoon, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due

November 4, 2019.

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 11th day of October, 2019

.

___________________________________ LUZ ESTRADA

, Chief Deputy Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 333 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 333

   Expressing the sense of Congress that the Attorney General should 
  appoint a special counsel on matters relating to Enron Corporation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2002

  Mr. Filner submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of Congress that the Attorney General should 
  appoint a special counsel on matters relating to Enron Corporation.

Whereas officers and directors of Enron Corporation sold $1,000,000,000 worth of 
        stock in the company during the period from October 1998 to November 
        2001;
Whereas Enron executives had 6 separate meetings with the Vice President or the 
        White House energy task force during the period from February 22, 2001, 
        to October 10, 2001;
Whereas Enron was the seventh largest company in the United States in 2000, with 
        revenues of more than $100,000,000,000 and a stock value of more than 
        $90 per share;
Whereas the collapse of Enron, and the resulting decline in stock value to less 
        than $1 per share, has hurt thousands of workers throughout the country 
        whose 401(k) portfolios contained Enron stock;
Whereas Enron was one of the largest contributors to President Bush's 
        presidential campaign, donating $110,000 to the campaign; and
Whereas Enron officers, directors, and employees have been a significant 
        contributor to President Bush from before the presidential campaign, 
        donating nearly $2,000,000 in support since 1993: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the Attorney General should 
appoint a special counsel on matters relating to Enron Corporation, 
including--
            (1) the relationship between Enron and the manipulation in 
        the stock market of its value per share;
            (2) the relationship between contributions by Enron to the 
        President, the Vice President, Cabinet officers, and other 
        Administration officials and Enron's rise and fall;
            (3) the influence of Enron on Federal and State 
        legislation, including in particular the effort to deregulate 
        the energy markets; and
            (4) the relationship between Enron and the Federal and 
        State regulatory system.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Patrick K. Donnelly, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PRA International.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Signature:
/s/ Patrick K. Donnelly
Name: Patrick K. Donnelly
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 424 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 424

Commending the patriotic contributions of the roofing professionals who 
  replaced, at no cost to the Federal Government, the section of the 
 Pentagon's slate roof that was destroyed as a result of the terrorist 
 attacks against the United States that occurred on September 11, 2001.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2002

  Ms. Velazquez (for herself, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Toomey, Ms. Millender-
      McDonald, Mr. DeMint, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. Thune, Mr. Brady of 
  Pennsylvania, Mr. Pence, Mr. Udall of New Mexico, Mr. Combest, Mr. 
     Hefley, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mrs. 
    Christensen, Mr. LoBiondo, Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Mrs. Kelly, Mr. 
Gonzalez, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Phelps, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Langevin, Mr. Issa, 
   Mr. Baird, Mr. Graves, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. Schrock, Mr. Udall of 
    Colorado, Mr. Grucci, Mr. Acevedo-Vila, Mr. Akin, Mr. Carson of 
    Oklahoma, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Ross, and Mr. Shuster) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Commending the patriotic contributions of the roofing professionals who 
  replaced, at no cost to the Federal Government, the section of the 
 Pentagon's slate roof that was destroyed as a result of the terrorist 
 attacks against the United States that occurred on September 11, 2001.

Whereas the damage to the Pentagon that resulted from the terrorist attacks 
        against the United States that occurred on September 11, 2001, included 
        the destruction of more than an acre of the Pentagon's slate roof;
Whereas roofing professionals from throughout the United States, mostly from 
        small businesses, volunteered to work together to replace the destroyed 
        section of the Pentagon's roof;
Whereas these roofing professionals donated approximately $450,000 worth of 
        labor and materials to the replacement effort; and
Whereas these roofing professionals successfully replaced 60,000 square feet of 
        the Pentagon's slate roof before September 11, 2002, and at no cost to 
        the Federal Government: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress commends the patriotic contributions of the roofing 
professionals who replaced, at no cost to the Federal Government, the 
section of the Pentagon's slate roof that was destroyed as a result of 
the terrorist attacks against the United States that occurred on 
September 11, 2001.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 395 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 395

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

      Celebrating the 50th anniversary of the Constitution of the 
                      Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 395

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas on July 3, 1952, the President signed Public Law 82-447 (66 Stat. 327), 
        approving the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico;
Whereas on July 10, 1952, the Constitutional Convention of Puerto Rico 
        reconvened and approved the conditions established by Public Law 82-447;
Whereas on July 25, 1952, Governor Luis Munoz Marin proclaimed that the 
        constitution was in effect;
Whereas the United States citizens of Puerto Rico have proudly fulfilled their 
        duties to this great Nation, and some have made the ultimate sacrifice 
        in defense of democracy, freedom, and the United States Constitution 
        since World War I; and
Whereas the cultural diversity of the United States has been enriched by the 
        people of Puerto Rico who have preserved and promoted their culture, 
        language, and identity: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress celebrates the 50th anniversary of the Constitution 
of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-51079 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE MARTINEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-02-CR-292-1-OG

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Martinez-Rodriguez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Martinez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Martinez maintains that he pleadedNo. 02-51079 -2- guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Martinez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Exhibit
32.1




TOT
Energy, Inc.


12100 NE
16 Ave; Suite 210


North
Miami, FL 33161




August
13, 2009




Securities
and Exchange Commission


100 F
Street, NE


Washington,
DC 20549




Re:
Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350




Dear
Ladies and Gentlemen:




In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TOT Energy,
Inc., for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, each of the undersigned hereby
certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), to the
undersigned’s knowledge that:




1.
            such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TOT Energy, Inc., for the quarter ended
      June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and




2.
            the
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TOT Energy,
      Inc., for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      TOT Energy, Inc.




BY: /S/ Mike ZoiMike
      ZoiChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)BY: /S/ Jonathan NewJonathan
      NewChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to TOT Energy, Inc. and will be
retained by TOT Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.




In
accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-B, this certification is
being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to TOT Energy, Inc.’s quarterly report
and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the
liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in
any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as
expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
#### In re The CONSERVATORSHIP OF Olivia D. LeCROY. Olivia D. LeCROY, By and Through Her Next Friend, J.M. RITCHEY v. Louise L. SANDERS, Conservator of the Person and Estate of Olivia D. LeCroy, and Thomas D. Keenum, Sr., Former Conservator of the Person and Estate of Olivia D. LeCroy.

No. 56467.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 4, 1987.

J.M. Ritchey, Cain, Cain & Ritchey, Canton, for appellant.

John A. Hatcher, John A. Ferrell, Cunningham, Smith & Ferrell, Booneville, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Prentiss County; Fred P. Wright, Chancellor.

Before WALKER, C.J., and PRATHER and SULLIVAN, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
Opinion filed December 13, 2018

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-18-00217-CV

__________

RENE H. MOLINAR, Appellant

V.

ESTHER PATRICIA GARCIA, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. FM58435

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The parties have filed in this court a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. In 

the motion, the parties state that they have reached an agreement regarding the merits 

of this appeal and, pursuant to the terms of their settlement agreement, have agreed 

that this appeal shall be dismissed. The parties request that we dismiss this appeal 

and remand the cause to the trial court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). 
2

We grant the motion and, accordingly, dismiss the appeal and remand the 

cause to the trial court. 

PER CURIAM

December 13, 2018

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., 

Willson, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

Willson, J., not participating. 

 1

Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, 

sitting by assignment.
# CUMBERLAND MEDICAL CENTER Ph: (931) 484-9511 421 South Main Street, Crossville TN, 38555

J.lIy 5, 2011
cantersfor Medicare & Medicaid Sarvices, Department of Health and Human ::ervices, Attention: 

### 011S-1436-P 

### P.o. Box 8013, Baltimore, MD21244-8013

To 'Whom It May ilincern, Iwanted to sharewith you my appreciation of your reconsideration on thefinal rule referring to physidan signature requirement on requisitions, file code 0IIS-1436-P. Iwhole heartily cg-ee that the propos:x:l rule reinstate the prior policy that "the signature of aphysidan or qualified non-physidan practitioner is not required on a requisition for Medicare purpos:x:l for adinical diagnostic laboratory , test paid under the Q.FS'

. Implementation of the current rule isimpossibleto negotiate. R1ysidans are not available 

### 2417to obtain asignature on a requisition. lhiswould result in un-necessary delays in patient treatment. For all the reas:>nsstated inthe Federal Fegister, Vol. 76, 

### No. 126/lhursday, JJne 

### 30, 2011, the 

### new**pro~** rule must take place. lhankyou,

# 404-1d~~ Carolyn 

### W. Snith, MT(AS:P) Administrative [lredor of Laboratory OJmberland Medical center 421 

### S Main Sreet O"ossville, IN38555 931-459-7165

"Quality Care Delivered By Quality Professionals" www.cmchealthcare.org