alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - RIN 0648-XB129

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of cancellation of a public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) has cancelled the public meeting of its Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) that was scheduled for Monday, April 16, 2012 beginning at 8 a.m. in Providence, RI.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, New England Fishery Management Council; telephone: (978) 465-0492.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The initial notice was published on March 30, 2012, (77 FR 19231), and the meeting will be rescheduled at a later date and announced in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801*et seq.*

Dated: April 2, 2012.

William D. Chappell,

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2012-8224 Filed 4-4-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 44

Recognizing the vital importance of hunting as a legitimate tool of wildlife

resource management.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 28, 2001

Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on Resources

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the vital importance of hunting as a legitimate

tool of wildlife resource management.

Whereas past predatory animal populations served to check

the population of nonpredatory species;

Whereas through habitat reduction and other means, humans

have played a role in the decline in the population of

predatory animals;

Whereas nonpredatory species experience prolonged starvation and devastating disease due to overpopulation;

Whereas hunting helps balance the population of nonpredatory species;

Whereas hunters have a strong commitment to the overall

health of wildlife and to the broader public’s enjoyment

of our natural resources;
2

•HCON 44 IH

Whereas hunters have contributed a majority of the financial

resources for wildlife preservation through Federal and

State revenues generated from hunting licenses and

stamps;

Whereas these revenues are used to create and preserve habitat for game, nongame, and endangered animal species;

and

Whereas these revenues are also used to regulate and effectively protect the populations of these animals: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Congress—

2 (1) recognizes hunting as a legitimate and nec3 essary tool of wildlife resource management;

4 (2) affirms the vital importance of lawful hunt5 ing, regulated by the various State departments in

6 charge of natural resources and the United States

7 Department of the Interior, in maintaining healthy

8 populations of wildlife;

9 (3) declares, as a matter of principle, that no

10 Federal law should be passed limiting the taking and

11 consumptive use of wildlife, other than those reason12 able laws to ensure the safety of hunters and the

13 continued perpetuation of wildlife itself; and

14 (4) acknowledges exceptions to paragraph (3),

15 including laws designed to—

16 (A) protect species that are in danger of

17 extinction;
3

•HCON 44 IH

1 (B) protect species which are not tradition2 ally considered as game or suitable for con3 sumptive use; and

4 (C) ensure hunting is carried out in a

5 sportsmanlike manner.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40726

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAUL GUEVARA-VILLANUEVA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:09-CR-245-1

Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raul GuevaraVillanueva has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Guevara-Villanueva has not

filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 20, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-40726 Document: 00511086069 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010
## – Mass Spectral Analysis

May 29, 2013

Executive Summary HPLC/MS (photoionization) has been used to characterize . The reports highlights major peak identification and compares the masses obtained to the proposed composition of .

Methodology Instrument: Agilent 1200 w/TOF- MS Ionization: photoionization (+ve ion mode) Column: Agilent XDB-C18 150 x 4.6 Flow rate: 1ml/min Gradient: THF/H2O gradientResults

Figure 1. HPLC

– MS analysis

The HPLC-MS TIC trace shows a peak 4 missing compared to UV trace. The identification of this peak has been determined to be (a starting product for the production of ). This compound does not respond to mass spectral analysis in the positive ion mode.Peak 1 Identification

a) Mass Spectrum

b) Elemental Composition

c) StructurePeak 2 Identification

a) Mass Spectrum

b) Elemental Composition

c) StructurePeak 5 Identification

a) Mass Spectrum

b) Elemental Composition

* nitrogen rule does not allow for composition 1 and 2. 3 is correct c) StructurePeak 6 Identification

a) Mass Spectrum

b) Elemental Composition

c) Proposed Structure:Peak 7 Identification

a) Mass Spectrum

These structures are highly complex and structural determination is difficult. The structures are likely to be
**To :**  **Cc: Bcc:**  **Subject :**  **Fw: IQRs used in Sarnat et al. 2008 (EHP)**

**From: "Sarnat, Jeremy" <** **jsarnat @emory.edu>**  **To: Tom Luben/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA**  **Date: 07/29/2011 10:02 AM**  **Subject: RE: IQRs used in Sarnat et al. 2008 (EHP)** 



### Tom - Here you go. Pay attention to the column with the IQ_Range heading. EC is row 9. Let me know if anything is unclear.

Jeremy

From: Tom Luben [mailto:Luben.Tom@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 9:22 AM To: Sarnat, Jeremy Subject: IQRs used in Sarnat et al. 2008 (EHP)

Hi Jeremy,

I a m currently working on the benefits of mitigating black carbon. I would like to include the results for CVD and respiratory ED vi sits associated with PM2.5-EC from your 2008 paper in EHP (Fine particle sources and cardiorespiratory morbidity: an application of chemical mass balance and factor analytical source-apportionment methods [ **Sarnat et al. (2008) in EHP vol 116 (4): 459-466**]). Specifically, I am interested in the results in Figures 2 and 3 in the paper (Tables 5 and 6 in the Supplemental Material). The titles for these Figures and Tables indicate that the risk ratios are per IQR increase. I've been looking through the paper and the supplemental material, and I haven't been able to find the IQR for PM2.5-EC (or the other pollutants). I noticed that the 10th and 90th percentiles are provided in Table 2, but not the IQR. Maybe I've missed them somewhere? Could you point me to where the IQRs are in the paper, or send me the IQRs for these risk ratios?

Thank you, T om

Tom Luben, Ph.D., MSPH Senior Epidemiologist U .S. Environmental Protection Agency National Center for Environmental Assessment Telephone: 919-541-5762 E-mail: luben.tom@epa.govIQR_data

ORDERAQ VARNAME IQ_RANGE IQ_RANGE_S STANDARD

1 DIESEL_PMF 2.328761357 2.328761357 1 2 GAS_PMF 1.233978095 1.233978095 1 3 DIESGAS_PMF 3.342523675 1.671261838 2 4 DIESEL_CMB 1.26 1.26 1 5 GAS_CMB 0.95 0.95 1 6 DIESGAS_CMB 2.05 1.025 2 7 DIESGAS_ZN 0.010725842 1.0725842 0.01 8 DIESGAS_FE 0.061356082 1.227121636 0.05 9 EC 1.255461802 1.255461802 1 10 OC 2.726102972 1.363051486 2 11 PM25D 11.375 1.1375 10 12 SOIL_PMF 0.476126472 1.19031618 0.4 13 SOIL_CMB 0.28 0.7 0.4 14 SOIL_SI 0.07679743 0.767974299 0.1 15 SOIL_CP 6.12794233 1.225588466 5 16 WOOD_PMF 0.959526341 1.199407926 0.8 17 WOOD_CMB 0.73 0.9125 0.8 18 WOOD_K 0.042969109 0.716151818 0.06 19 WOOD_CL 0.077830764 0.97288455 0.08 20 AMSULF_PMF 5.776407833 1.155281567 5 21 AMSULF_CMB 5.21 1.042 5 22 AMBSLF_CMB 0.2 0.2 1 23 SO4P1 3.917685038 0.783537008 5 24 SULFATE2_PMF 1.312083648 2.18680608 0.6 25 AMNITR_PMF 0.91441847 0.91441847 1 26 AMNITR_CMB 1.25 1.25 1 27 AMNITR_NO3 0.863874001 0.863874001 1 28 PWRPLNT_CMB 0.13 1.3 0.1 29 PWRPLNT_SE 0.001532782 1.532782 0.001 30 PWRPLNT_SO2 17.69039154 0.884519577 20 31 CEMENT_PMF 0.332910112 1.109700373 0.3 32 OTHROC_CMB 1.79 0.895 2 33 BUSHIGHWAY_PMF 0.112405031 0.224810062 0.5 34 RAILROD_PMF 0.506583662 2.53291831 0.2 35 METALPROC_PMF 0.817597868 1.362663113 0.6

IQR_data Page 1
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Rand Logistics,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Laurence S. Levy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as
      of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the
      Company for the periods presented.

Dated: August 14, 2006


/s/ Laurence S. Levy
-----------------------
Laurence S. Levy
Chief Executive Officer
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

BARUN ACHARYA AND XINGEN DONG, 

 Appellants, 

v. 

RAYMOND HAUSER AND LONNIE E. HOLDER, 

Appellees. 

____________________ 

2011-1452 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in 

Interference No. 105,750. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

JAY R. CAMPBELL, Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, 

LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for appellants. With him 

on the brief were DON W. BULSON, TODD R. TUCKER, KYLE 

B. FLEMING and NICHOLAS J. GINGO. 

 THOMAS C. MCDONOUGH, Neal Gerber & Eisenberg, 

LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for appellees. With him 

on the brief was LAWRENCE E. JAMES, JR. Of counsel on 

the brief were CHARLES L. GHOLZ and W. TODD BAKER, 
Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C., of 

Alexandria, Virginia. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LINN, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit 

Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 14, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Series 25-2004 (B) L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General
Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Freddie M.
      KotekName:
            Freddie
      M. KotekTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            November
      13, 2008
PCA : 12-3J14-24-B-0285 

PURCHASE AWARD DESCRIPTION 

March 27, 2024 14:20:00 

The Department of Agriculture (USDA) purchased Fresh Apples as indicated below for distribution to the 

child nutrition and other related domestic food assistance programs for Fiscal Year 2024. 

The purchase is the result of offers received in response to Solicitation No. 2000009945 dated March 6, 

2024 

The materials were purchased on an f.o.b. destination basis. Deliveries are to be made from April 22, 

2024 to April 24, 2024. 

Further information can be obtained from the Commodity Procurement Staff, Agricultural Marketing Service,

 USDA, Room 3522 South Building, Washington, DC 20250, telephone (202) 720-4517 or the website at http: 

//www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food. Cumulative purchase data can be found at: http://www.ams.usda. 

gov/reports/purchase-summary-report. 

Number of Offers/Quotes(Vendor Responses) received: 5 

PURCHASE SUMMARY 

Material Total Qty UOM Price Range Total Dollars 

APPLES FUJI FRESH F CARTON-40 LB 1,848.000 CS $23.7100 - $23.7100 $ 

43,816.08 

TOTAL 1,848.000 CS $ 43,816.08 

PURCHASE DETAILS 

Contractor/ Material Plant Bid Inv. Destination Quantity UOM Price 

Contract Number Location Item 

EB TRADING GROUP LLC 

PO Box 2433 

Wenatchee, WA 98807 

12-3J14-24-C-1317 Milton-Freewater, OR 

4100029655 

APPLES FUJI FRESH F CARTON-40 LB 

40 NEWARK, NJ 924.000CS $ 

23.7100 

60 VINELAND, 924.000CS $ 

NJ 23.7100 

Subtotal 1,848.000CS 

Contract Total 1,848.000CS $ 43,816.08 

Contractor Total 1,848.000 CS $ 43,816.08
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 68 (Monday, April 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8490]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Dockets 60, 61 and 62-2011]


Foreign-Trade Zones 140 and 78, Applications for Subzone 
Authority Dow Corning Corporation, Hemlock Semiconductor Corporation, 
and Hemlock Semiconductor, L.L.C.; Reopening of Rebuttal Periods

    The rebuttal periods for the applications for subzone authority at 
the Dow Corning Corporation facility in Midland, Michigan (76 FR 63282-
63283, 10/12/2011), at the Hemlock Semiconductor Corporation facility 
in Hemlock, Michigan (76 FR 63282, 10/12/2011) and at the Hemlock 
Semiconductor, L.L.C. facility in Clarksville, Tennessee (76 FR 63281-
63282, 10/12/2011) are being reopened. The rebuttal comments submitted 
on March 13, 2012 on behalf of the companies cited above contained new 
factual information on which there has not been a chance for public 
comment. The rebuttal period for the cases referenced above is being 
reopened to April 24, 2012, to allow interested parties to comment on 
the applicants' rebuttal submission. Submissions shall be addressed to 
the Board's Executive Secretary at: Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, Room 2111, 1401 Constitution Ave. NW., 
Washington, DC 20230.
    For further information, contact Elizabeth Whiteman at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2c694045564d4e495844027b44455849414d426c585e4d4849024b435a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="783d141102191a1d0c10562f10110c1d151916380c0a191c1d561f170e">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 482-0473.

    Dated: April 3, 2012.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8490 Filed 4-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed June 25, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-18-01492-CV

DAMION ELLIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

ESTATE OF KAYON ANTHONY ELLIS, DECEASED, Appellant

V.

LINDA DELWOOD, M.D., SOUTH TEXAS DENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC., D/B/A 

SOUTH TEXAS DENTAL CLINIC, BRANDON DAHL, DDS, AND RUSSELL TAKASHI 

CHOY, DDS, AND PARK CENTAL SURGICAL CENTER, LTD., Appellees

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-05739

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Schenck, Osborne, and Reichek

Opinion by Justice Schenck

Appellant’s brief in this accelerated case is overdue. By postcard dated May 15, 2019, we 

notified appellant the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant to file a brief and 

an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an 

extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, 

appellant has not filed his brief nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of 

this appeal.
–2–

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

181492F.P05

/David J. Schenck/

DAVID J. SCHENCK

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DAMION ELLIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND 

AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF 

THE ESTATE OF KAYON ANTHONY 

ELLIS, DECEASED, Appellant

No. 05-18-01492-CV V.

LINDA DELWOOD, M.D., SOUTH 

TEXAS DENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC., 

D/B/A SOUTH TEXAS DENTAL 

CLINIC, BRANDON DAHL, DDS, AND 

RUSSELL TAKASHI CHOY, DDS, AND 

PARK CENTAL SURGICAL CENTER, 

LTD., Appellees

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-05739.

Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck. 

Justices Osborne and Reichek participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee LINDA DELWOOD, M.D., SOUTH TEXAS DENTAL 

ASSOCIATES, INC., D/B/A SOUTH TEXAS DENTAL CLINIC, BRANDON DAHL, DDS, 

AND RUSSELL TAKASHI CHOY, DDS, AND PARK CENTAL SURGICAL CENTER, 

LTD. recover their costs of this appeal from appellant DAMION ELLIS, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF KAYON ANTHONY 

ELLIS, DECEASED.

Judgment entered this 25th day of June, 2019.
#### In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Vilis BERGHOLDS, Deceased. Milly VALKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Rasma KRABACHER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Vilis Bergholds, Deceased, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 80CA0099.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

July 10, 1980.

As Modified On Denial of Rehearing Aug. 21, 1980.

Certiorari Denied Nov. 10, 1980.

Theodore B. Atlass, P. C., Theodore B. Atlass, Denver, for petitioner-appellant.

George A. Hinshaw, P. C., George A. Hin-shaw, Aurora, for respondent-appellee.

COYTE, Judge.

Petitioner, Milly Valks, appeals the judgment of the probate court denying her petition to compel reimbursement for death taxes paid by her. We affirm.

At the time of his death, the decedent, Vilis Bergholds, held three savings accounts in joint tenancy with petitioner. Petitioner, in order to obtain an early release of the funds in the savings accounts, filed a Colorado Inheritance Tax Statement and on November 14, 1978, paid $1,497.04 in inheritance taxes to the State of Colorado. The first publication of the notice to creditors was filed January 12, 1979. On May 17, 1979, petitioner filed a petition in the probate court seeking reimbursement for the taxes paid.

Petitioner contends that she is entitled to be reimbursed for the taxes which she paid because of the following provision of decedent’s will:

> “I direct that all estate, inheritance and other death taxes payable by reason of my death on any property included in my Estate for tax purposes shall be paid as an expense of administration without contribution from any person and without apportionment.”

Although the inheritance taxes arising under the joint accounts here at issue would fall within the purview of this clause, when claimant voluntarily paid the tax, she became a creditor of the estate. Section 15-12-803(2), C.R.S.1973, provides that a claim *1087against an estate arising at or after the decedent’s death must be presented within four months after it arises or be forever barred. The one exception to this rule is inapplicable here. Accordingly, since petitioner’s claim was not filed within this four month period, it is barred by § 15-12-803(2), C.R.S.1973.

Judgment affirmed.

VAN CISE and KIRSHBAUM, JJ., concur.
MEMORANDUM

Tetra Tech, Inc.

10306 Eaton Place, Suite 340

Fairfax, VA 22030

phone 703-385-6000

fax 703-385-6007

DATE: March 2, 2012

TO: Paul Shriner, EPA

FROM: Blaine Snyder, Tetra Tech

SUBJECT: Summary of American Fisheries Society (AFS) 2011 Symposium

In support of the 316(b) rulemaking, Tetra Tech attended the American Fisheries 

Society’s (AFS) annual meeting in Seattle, Washington on September 5th and 6th, 2011. 

The symposium was sponsored by the AFS Bioengineering Section. The Monday

session started at 1:15 PM with an introduction and presentation by Doug Dixon (EPRI) 

on the draft 316(b) rule for existing facilities. The first session ended at 5:15 PM, and the 

symposium resumed at 8:00 AM on Tuesday and continued until 3:00 PM. There were a 

total of 37 platform presentations. Although it is somewhat difficult to categorize all 

presentations, the majority focused on intake technologies, impingement/entrainment 

surveys, source water surveys, and economic benefits. Most speakers were representing 

engineering/consulting firms or utilities.

Attached to this memo is a summary of the symposium, including abstracts from each 

presentation.

One presentation was of particular interest to EPA; it was titled “Abundance and 

Composition of Fish and Shellfish Impinged and Entrained at Power Plant Intakes Based 

on a Survey of Over 220 Power Plants” and was presented by Greg Seegert of EA 

Engineering. EPA followed up with Mr. Seegert and the sponsor of the research, Doug 

Dixon of EPRI. The EPRI document upon which the presentation is based is also 

attached, as well as an additional analysis provided by EPRI.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-24-00198-CR

MISAEL NUNEZMARQUEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 485th District 

Court

of Tarrant County (1811304)

August 22, 2024

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM