alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
• .-d:1>--a Br1dgecrest  1720 W. Rio Salado Parkway - Tempe, AZ.- 85281 (602) 852-o6ooj  Bridgecrest Credit Company  OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE  The undersigned hereby certifies that he is a duly authorized officer of Bridgecrest Credit  Company (the "Servicer''), and that as such he is authorized to execute and deliver this certificate  in the name and on behalf of Bridgecrest Credit Company, and certifies that:  1. I have reviewed the activities of the Servicer during the period January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022 and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement; and 2. to the best of my knowledge, based on such review and other than described herein, the Servicer has substantially fulfilled all its obligations under the Servicing Agreement for the above referenced period. This certificate is delivered in accordance with Section 2.9 of the Carvana Auto Receivables 2021- N4 Servicing Agreement dated as of December 15, 2021, among Carvana Auto Receivables Trust  2021-N4, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Bridgecrest Credit Company. This  certificate is dated as of December 31, 2022.  By:-------------­ Daniel Gaudreau  Chief Financial Officer  /s/ Daniel Gaudreau Exhibit 35.1
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laycor Ventures Corp.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Robert Wayne Morgan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14th day of November, 2005.



| | /s/ Robert Wayne Morgan                            
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Robert Wayne Morgan                                
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



















---
EXHIBIT 32



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Roebling  Financial Corp, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB  for the  quarter  ended  June 30,  2006  (the
"Report")  as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof, we, Frank J. Travea,  III,  President and Chief Executive  Officer,  and
Janice A. Summers,  Senior Vice  President,  Chief  Operating  Officer and Chief
Financial Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Frank J. Travea, III                  /s/ Janice A. Summers
-------------------------------------     --------------------------------------
Frank J. Travea, III                      Janice A. Summers
President and Chief Executive Officer     Senior Vice President, Chief Operating
                                          Officer and Chief Financial Officer

August 9, 2006
J.W. BARTON GRAIN INSPECTION SERVICE, INC.

720 LEITCHFIELD RD.

OWENSBORO, KY. 42303

PHONE: (270) 683-0616

COMMODITY FEES

Agriculture Marketing Act (AMA)

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 2024. The Federal Grain Inspection Service (FGIS) must approve all fees for 

official services and Official Agencies will assess only those fees appearing on their current approved fee 

schedule. 

OFFICE HOURS: Owensboro office hours are 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. C.S.T. 

Jeffersonville office hours are 7:00 a.m. – 3:00 E.S.T.

BUSINESS HOURS

REGULAR HOURS

MON-FRI. $30.00

OVERTIME HOURS $45.00

HOLIDAY & SUNDAY HOURS $60.00

HOLIDAYS: New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King Day, President’s Day, Memorial Day, 4th of July, Labor 

Day, Columbus Day, Veteran’s Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day, and all Federally Observed 

Holidays 

All hourly rates will be assessed in quarter hour increments. Travel and standby time will be assessed at 

the applicable hourly rate.

MINIMUM FEE: A 4-hour minimum call out fee will be assessed at the applicable hourly rate. Travel 

time will not be charged when the minimum fee applies.

MILEAGE: The IRS standard mileage rate will be assessed per mile for the actual mileage traveled. Any

change to the mileage rate is effective when the IRS changes their standard mileage rate. Mileage and 

travel time will be prorated where possible.

PER DIEM: $25.00 per day per individual plus lodging expense, when required 

to stay overnight away from the main office location. 

LODGING EXPENSE: When require to stay overnight from main office.
Commodity Cooperative Service Agreement Fees: In addition to all other applicable fees, commodity 

cooperative service agreement fees for commodity inspection services (pulses, hops, and miscellaneous 

processed commodities), excluding rice, will be assessed at the current percentage rate identified in 

FGIS Directive 9180.74 (Service Fees and Billing Codes, Attachment 4.) The assessed fees must exclude 

travel, mailing expenses, and state and local taxes. Invoices will identify assessed commodity 

cooperative service agreement fees as separate line items.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions 10th Cir. R. 36.3.



### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 10/28/96 TENTH CIRCUIT

ROGER LEE PARKER, Petitioner,

v. BOB GUZIK and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondents. No. 96-6062 (D.C. No. CIV-95-1955-R) (W. Dist. Okla.)



### ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before SEYMOUR , Chief Judge, KELLY and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Roger Lee Parker, a federal prisoner, filed this pr o se habeas corpus-2-

petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 alleging that a par ole violator warrant was improperly issued and that his original sentence wa s illegally altered. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge, who recommendedthat Mr. Parker’s petition be denied for failure to exhaust administrative rem edies. The district court adopted the report and recommendation in its entire ty on the basis of Mr. Parker’s failure to object to it. On appeal, Mr Parker asserts that even though he in formed the court of his change of address, the report was sent to his old a ddress. A review of the district court docket sheet reveals that Mr. Parker’s change -of-address notice and the report crossed in the mail, and that he did not rec eive the report in time to make timely objections to it. While this court has a fi rm waiver rule under which the failure to make timely objection to the magistrate’ s findings or recommendation waives appellate review of both legal and factual i ssues, we need not apply the rule when the interests of justice dictate. See Moore v. United States , 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991). We believe the interest s-of-justice exception is applicable here, and accordingly we turn to Mr. Par ker’s other argument on appealMr. Parker contends he offered evidence in the formof his belated written objections and the attachments thereto that he had in fact exhausted his administrative remedies and that the magistrate jud ge therefore improperly-3-

recommended dismissal of his petition. However, th e record on appeal does not contain the material upon which Mr. Parker relies, and the district court docket sheet does not show that it was ever filed. Moreov er, in his petition in district court, Mr. Parker stated that he did not exhaust hi s administrative remedies because administrative relief does not apply in thi s case. He does not make that argument on appeal, contending only that he has in fact exhausted. Because he has failed to establish that he has done so, howeve r, we affirm the dismissal of his petition. AFFIRMED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT Stephanie K. Seymour Chief Judge
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v. JOSE ABEL CABRERA

- SOMOSA , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 21

- 0 400 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2008

- 006195

- 001 The Honorable Ronee Korbin Steiner , Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney ’ s Office , Phoenix By Amanda M. Parker Counsel for Respondent
Jose Abel Cabrera

- Somosa, Yuma Petitioner FILED 1-20-2022STATE v. CABRERA

- SOMOSA Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Maria Elena Cruz , Judge Samuel A. Thumma, and Judge Michael J. Brown delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Jose Abel Cabrera

- Somosa seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief

. This is petitioner’s sixth successive petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 66 (Thursday, April 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8155]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12790-001]


Pomperaug Hydro Project; Andrew Peklo III; Notice Extending 
Deadline for Comments

    On January 18, 2012, Office of Energy Projects staff held a 
technical meeting in Woodbury, CT. The meeting was transcribed by a 
court reporter; however, due to various processing delays, the 
transcript was not added to the public record for the Pomperaug Hydro 
Project (FERC No. 12790) until March 21, 2012. Because the transcript 
for the technical meeting was not available to the public until after 
the expiration of the comment period established in the Commission's 
January 12, 2012, notice, the deadline for filing comments is extended 
to April 13, 2012.
    Comments may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit 
brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, 
using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information at the 
end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online 
Support. Although the Commission strongly encourages electronic filing, 
documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file, mail an original and 
seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    If you have questions, please contact Steve Kartalia at (202) 502-
6131, or via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c6b5b2a3b6aea3a8e8ada7b4b2a7aaafa786a0a3b4a5e8a1a9b0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="196a6d7c69717c773772786b6d78757078597f7c6b7a377e766f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 29, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8155 Filed 4-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
PCA : 12-3J14-24-B-0149-0001 December 22, 2023 13:00:00 

PURCHASE AWARD DESCRIPTION 

The Department of Agriculture (USDA) has cancelled this offer to purchase CHICKEN PRODUCTS (CANNED), 

under Solicitation 2000009787 (12-3J14-24-B-0149), dated December 21, 2023. The orders will be used for 

existing contracts issued for the National Warehouse Pilot Program. 

Further information can be obtained from the Commodity Procurement Program, Agricultural Marketing 

Service, USDA, Room 3522 South Building, Washington, DC 20250, telephone (202) 720-4517 or the website 

at http://www.ams.usda.gov/selling-food.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 2 (Tuesday, January 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33177]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Maine Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that orientation and 
planning meetings of the Maine Advisory Committee to the Commission 
will convene at 10 a.m. on Tuesday, January 4, 2011, at the Avesta 
Conference Room, Immigrant Legal Advocacy Project, 309 Cumberland 
Avenue, Suite 201, Portland, ME 04112. The purpose of the orientation 
meeting is to provide ethics training and to describe the rules of 
operation for SAC activities to the Committee members. The purpose of 
the planning meeting is to review recent Commission and regional 
activities, discuss current civil rights issues in the State and to 
plan future activities.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by February 4, 2011. 
The address is the Eastern Regional Office, 624 9th Street, NW., Suite 
740, Washington, DC 20425. Persons wishing to e-mail their comments, or 
who desire additional information should contact the Eastern Regional 
Office at 202-376-7533 or by e-mail to: ero@usccr.gov.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meetings and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meetings.
    Records generated from these meetings may be inspected and 
reproduced at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, 
both before and after the meetings. Persons interested in the work of 
this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the 
above e-mail or street address.
    The meetings will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2010-33177 Filed 1-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 Docket Nos.Bishop Hill Interconnection LLC
EG12-24-000.Tenaska Washington Partners, L.P
EG12-25-000.Pattern Santa Isabel LLC
EG12-26-000.Mariposa Energy, LLC
EG12-27-000.Blue Summit Wind, LLC
EG12-28-000.CPV Sentinel, LLC
EG12-29-000.Spring Valley Wind LLC
EG12-30-000.Dynegy Midwest Generation, LLC
EG00-235-000.
 Take notice that during the month of March 2012, the status of the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators became effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a). Dated: April 4, 2012. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2012-8650 Filed 4-10-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 31.2
                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Lee R. Schlesinger, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Naugatuck Valley
Financial Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2005


By: /s/ Lee R. Schlesinger
    ----------------------
    Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)


                                       18
#### In the Matter of Bernard Marcus Association Inc., Petitioner.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

February 24, 1959.

*George Green*for petitioner.

Louis L. Friedman, J.

An application for a certificate of incorporation is submitted for approval. The purposes of the proposed corporation are stated to be as follows: “ Civic, charitable, political and to engage in such undertakings, which are beneficial to all mankind and to the City and State of New York.”

These purposes take in a great deal of territory and the court is unable to approve a certificate which is so broad in its nature. If it is to be a charitable corporation, then the court should be made aware of the means which will be used to raise funds and how those funds are to be administered. It may very well be that if the purposes of a charitable corporation are clearly and properly set forth, that the certificate may require the consent of the Department of Social Welfare. If it is to be purely a political association, and if it is to become affiliated with any one of the recognized political parties, then the consent of the chairman of the county committee of that party must be annexed. The phrase that the corporation is “to engage in such undertakings, which are beneficial to all mankind and to the City and State of New York ” is so broad and requires so much interpretation, that the court may not sanction the formation of a *584corporation which has such broad aspects, and which may to accomplish such purposes, find it necessary to obtain consents of various departments having jurisdiction. For instance, it may be beneficial to mankind to have a new insurance company set up, and in such instance the Department of Insurance would have to supervise this corporation. Or the organization may find it beneficial to open a bank, and such a step would require supervision of the Superintendent of Banks. The purposes must be more clearly set forth in the proposed certificate and the court declines to approve the present certificate as submitted.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8165]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


eMax Worldwide, Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading

April 2, 2012.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that the 
public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of 
trading in the securities of eMax Worldwide, Inc. (CIK: 0000830519) 
because there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning 
its securities. eMax Worldwide, Inc. has failed to make periodic 
filings with the Commission and has more than 300 shareholders of 
record. eMax Worldwide, Inc. is quoted on OTC Markets Group Inc. under 
the ticker EMXC.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of eMax Worldwide, Inc. Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant 
to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading 
in the securities of eMax Worldwide, Inc. is suspended for the period 
from 9:30 a.m. EDT on April 2, 2012, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 
16, 2012.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8165 Filed 4-2-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P