```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21615-21616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8522]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-66734; File No. SR-ISE-2012-29]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange, 
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule 
Change Relating to Additions to the Schedule of Fees

April 4, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on April 2, 2012, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (the 
``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described 
in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the 
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments 
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The ISE proposes to add notes to its Schedule of Fees with respect 
to two fees. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the 
Exchange's Web site (http://www.ise.com), at the principal office of 
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization 
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the 
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to add notes to its Schedule of Fees with 
respect to the application of two fees currently assessed by ISE. The 
first note relates to Non-ISE Market Maker fees, which apply to regular 
and complex orders, and how those fees are applied to execution of 
complex orders on the Exchange.\3\ Non-ISE Market Maker fees were 
adopted by ISE in 2006.\4\ Prior to this fee change, Non-ISE Market 
Makers were subject to the fee listed on the Schedule of Fees under 
``firm proprietary'' for both regular and complex orders. In order to 
attract complex orders to the Exchange, ISE charged an execution fee 
only on the largest leg of a complex order. Most of the execution fees 
for complex orders on the Exchange's Schedule of Fees currently note 
that for complex orders, this fee is ``charged for the leg of the trade 
consisting of the most contracts.'' However, in 2006, when ISE carved 
out the fee for Non-ISE Market Makers as a separate line item on the 
Schedule of Fees, the Exchange inadvertently failed to note that the 
Exchange only charges an execution fee on the largest leg of a trade 
for complex orders sent to the Exchange. The Exchange continued to 
charge Non-ISE Market Makers only for the largest leg of a complex 
order. The Exchange now proposes to add the following note under the 
Non-ISE Market Maker line item: ``For Complex Orders, fee charged only 
for the leg of the trade consisting of the most contracts.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ A Non-ISE Market Maker is a market maker as defined in 
Section 3(a)(38) of the Act, registered in the same options class on 
another options exchange.
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53630 (April 11, 
2006), 71 FR 19918 (April 18, 2006) (SR-ISE-2006-18).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The second note relates to a fee for executions in symbols that are 
subject to the Exchange's modified maker/taker fees. The Exchange 
initially adopted modified maker/taker fees in April 2010 \5\ and has 
since amended these fees regularly in response to competitive changes 
made by other options exchanges. These fees apply to market 
participants that add or remove liquidity from the Exchange in 101 
options classes.\6\ When the Exchange adopted modified maker/taker 
fees, it did not specify how the maker/taker fees would apply to 
executions by Primary Market Makers (PMMs) when they provide away 
market price protection for marketable public customer orders when the 
ISE market is not at the NBBO in accordance with their obligations 
under ISE rules and the Intermarket Linkage Plan.\7\ Since the PMM is 
performing its linkage obligations when it executes (i.e., ``trade 
reports'') such public customer orders, it is neither a taker nor maker 
of liquidity as those terms are used within the framework of the ISE's 
maker/taker pricing model. Accordingly, when PMMs are performing this 
intermarket price protection function, the Exchange has not charged any 
fees or provided any rebates for PMM trade reports since the adoption 
of the maker/taker fees. The Exchange now proposes to specify in a note 
that: ``Primary Market Makers do not receive a maker rebate nor pay a 
taker fee when trade reporting a public customer order in accordance 
with their obligation to provide away market price protection pursuant 
to ISE Rule 803(c)(2).''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61869 (April 7, 
2010), 75 FR 19449 (April 14, 2010) (SR-ISE-2010-25).
    \6\ Options classes subject to maker/taker fees are identified 
by their ticker symbol on the Exchange's Schedule of Fees.
    \7\ The Intermarket Linkage Plan prohibits an exchange from 
allowing the automatic execution of public customer orders at a 
price that is inferior to the best prices being publically displayed 
by another exchange. Under ISE Rule 803(c)(2), it is the 
responsibility of the PMM to either execute an order at a price that 
matches or betters the NBBO, or obtain such better prices on behalf 
of the public customer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal to clarify its Schedule of 
Fees is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \8\ in general, and 
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \9\ in 
particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable dues, 
fees and other charges among Exchange members and other persons using 
its facilities. In particular, the proposal will correct an ambiguity 
that was created by the adoption of a separate Non-ISE Market Maker fee 
that failed to specify the fee's application to complex orders. Non-ISE 
Market Makers were only charged for the largest leg of a complex order 
prior to that fee change, and continued to be charged only for the 
largest leg of a complex order after the fee change. Accordingly, the 
Exchange's application of the transaction fee to complex orders 
remained consistent, and Non-ISE Market Makers continued to be treated

[[Page 21616]]

in a non-discriminatory manner with respect to the execution of complex 
orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also believes it is fair and equitable not to charge a 
taker fee, nor provide a maker rebate, to PMMs when they trade report a 
public customer order in compliance with their linkage obligations. The 
PMM neither receives a financial benefit in the form of a rebate from 
performing its obligations, nor is it subject to the burden of paying 
the taker fee. The Exchange believe this is the most fair way to 
approach the PMM trade report function under the maker/taker pricing 
model, as categorizing the PMM trade report as a maker or taker would 
either provide an inequitable benefit to PMMs or place an inequitable 
burden on PMMs. The proposal to codify the application of the maker/
taker pricing model to PMM trade reports will add transparency to the 
Exchange's Schedule of Fees.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition 
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of 
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit, 
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received 
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested 
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\10\ At any time within 60 days of the 
filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may 
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission 
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, 
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the 
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the 
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-ISE-2012-29 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2012-29. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for 
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2012-29 and should be 
submitted on or before May 1, 2012.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8522 Filed 4-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```