alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7833]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Roy Lichtenstein: A Retrospective” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, from on or about May 16, 2012, until on or about September 3, 2012; The National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, from on or about October 14, 2012, until on or about January 6, 2013, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

Dated: March 20, 2012.

J. Adam Ereli,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2012-7349 Filed 3-26-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
[No. 36668-8-I.

Division One.

June 10, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Richard Allen Henry, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-1-08277-5, James A. Noe, J., entered May 22, 1995. *Dismissed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
EXHIBIT 31.1




                                 CERTIFICATION
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Philip E. Zegarelli, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Voorhees
Acquisition Corp.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

       b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date:  May 18, 2005


/s/ Philip E. Zegarelli
---------------------------------------
Philip E. Zegarelli, President
(principal executive officer and principal
 accounting officer)
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos

    Coronavirus Disease 2019

    Air Force Art Collection





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2021

    Focus on Priorities

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    CSAF Leadership Library    
        CSAF Leadership Library Bookshelf

    2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers





    Contact Us  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (1.14 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR ActOSI Tip Line
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit
EXHIBIT 11.1

YEAR TO DATE ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
                      at December 31, 1996                            4,542,519
                                                                      =========
                    Before effect of preferred dividends.
                      accretion of preferred stock
                      and warrant exercises              ($4,089,714)    ($0.90)
                    Effect of preferred dividends,
                      accretion of preferred stock
                      and warrant exercises               (1,071,035)     (0.24)

                    Loss per share after effect of
                      preferred dividends, accretion
                      of preferred stock and warrant      ----------------------
                      exercises                          ($5,160,749)    ($1.14)
                                                          ======================
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 246

Relative to the death of Carl Curtis, former United States Senator for

the State of Nebraska.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 26, 2000

Mr. KERREY (for himself, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. LOTT, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. ASHCROFT, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. BAYH,

Mr. BENNETT, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. BOND, Mrs. BOXER, Mr.

BREAUX, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. BRYAN, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. BURNS, Mr.

BYRD, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. L. CHAFEE, Mr. CLELAND, Mr. COCHRAN,

Ms. COLLINS, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. CRAPO,

Mr. DEWINE, Mr. DODD, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. DURBIN,

Mr. EDWARDS, Mr. ENZI, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. FITZGERALD, Mr. FRIST, Mr. GORTON, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. GRAMM, Mr.

GRAMS, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. GREGG, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. HATCH, Mr.

HELMS, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr.

INHOFE, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr.

KERRY, Mr. KOHL, Mr. KYL, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr.

LEAHY, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. LUGAR, Mr.

MACK, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. MCCONNELL, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. MOYNIHAN,

Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. NICKLES, Mr. REED, Mr. REID,

Mr. ROBB, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. ROTH, Mr.

SANTORUM, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SHELBY,

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire, Mr. SMITH of Oregon, Ms. SNOWE, Mr.

SPECTER, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. THOMPSON, Mr. THURMOND,

Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. WARNER, Mr. WELLSTONE, and

Mr. WYDEN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered

and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Relative to the death of Carl Curtis, former United States

Senator for the State of Nebraska.
2

SRES 246 ATS

Whereas Senator Curtis served with honor and distinction,

for the State of Nebraska, in the House of Representatives from 1939 until his resignation in 1954 and in the

Senate from 1955 to 1979;

Whereas Senator Curtis served his country for 40 years;

Whereas Senator Curtis stood for fiscal and social conservatism;

Whereas Senator Curtis regarded one of his biggest accomplishments as bringing flood control and irrigation to the

Midwest;

Whereas Senator Curtis served as the Senate Republican

Conference Chairman and ranking member on the Finance Committee during his last term in office;

Whereas Senator Curtis was admitted to the bar in 1930 and

had a private law practice in Minden, Nebraska prior to

his service in the House of Representatives; and

Whereas Senator Curtis served in Congress longer than any

other Nebraskan: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound

2 sorrow and deep regret the announcement of the death

3 of the Honorable Carl Curtis, former member of the

4 United States Senate.

5 Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate commu6 nicate these resolutions to the House of Representatives

7 and transmit an enrolled copy thereof to the family of the

8 deceased.
3

SRES 246 ATS

1 Resolved, That when the Senate adjourns today, it

2 stand adjourned as a further mark of respect to the mem3 ory of the Honorable Carl Curtis.

Æ
#### Metz et al., Appellants, *v.*City of Cincinnati, Appellee.

(No. 31311

Decided April 21, 1948.)

*Messrs. Bettinger, Schmitt & Kreis*and *Miss Margaret Donelan,*for appellants.

*Mr. Henry M. Bruestle,*city solicitor, and *Mr. Isabel Guy,*for appellee.

*577It is ordered and adjudged tliat this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable 'constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner,, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.
Loan Forgiveness and Termination Agreement

      This Loan Forgiveness and Termination Agreement (the "Agreement") is made
this 15th day of August 2005, by and between HUA KANG (DAVID) ZHOU ("Lender")
and MOVING BYTES INC. ("Borrower"), a Canadian company.

      WHEREAS, Lender and Borrower have entered into a Loan Agreement dated as
of June 13, 2005 (the "Loan Agreement"), under which Lender agreed to loan up to
US$50,000 to Borrower to be used for general working capital.

      WHEREAS, Lender has the right to convert all or any part of the amount
loaned to Borrower into common shares of Moving Bytes Inc. at a price equal to
US$.02 per share at any time until December 31, 2005.

      WHEREAS, the outstanding balance under the Loan Agreement is US$10,000
(the "Loan").

      WHEREAS, Lender has agreed to accept all of the assets and assume all of
the liabilities of Borrower pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption Agreement,
dated as of August 12, 2005, by and between Warner Technology Development Co. (a
company controlled by Lender) and Moving Bytes Inc. in connection with a Share
Exchange Agreement, dated as of August 15, 2005, by and among Moving Bytes Inc.,
China International Enterprises Corp. ("CIEC"), all CIEC shareholders, Heng Xing
Technology Group Development Limited and the Escrow Agent thereof.

      WHEREAS, Lender desires to forgive the Loan and terminate the Loan
Agreement.

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms, conditions and other
agreements set forth herein, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

      1. Lender hereby agrees to forgive the right to repayment of the Loan in
the amount of US$10,000 by Borrower and waive the right of conversion with
respect to the Loan. Borrower shall have no further obligations or liabilities
whatsoever under the Loan Agreement. The loan forgiveness and waiver of
conversion right under this Section 1 shall become effective immediately as of
the date herein.

      2. The parties hereto agree to terminate the Loan Agreement, effective
immediately as of the date herein.




<PAGE>


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of
the date first above written.


BORROWER:

MOVING BYTES INC.


-----------------------------
Name:  John Leo
Title:  Secretary & Director





LENDER:



-------------------------------
Hua Kang (David) Zhou
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Starry Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the period ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, in the capacity and on the date indicated below,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 
1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

 
2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

Date: March 31, 2022 

 

/s/ Chaitanya Kanojia
Chaitanya KanojiaChief Executive Officer
 
**
[No. 17888-5-II.

Division Two.

July 19, 1996.]

#### *In the Matter of the Estate of*Caryl J. Lucas. Estate of Caryl J. Lucas, *Respondent,*v. Douglas A. Bowen, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 92-2-02175-2, Rosanne Buckner, J., entered December 17, 1993. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Haberly, J. Pro Tern., concurred in by Houghton, A.C.J., and Fleisher, J. Pro Tern.
#### YUBA HEAT TRANSFER and American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, Petitioner, v. Edward WIGGINS, Respondent.

No. 53984.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

June 23, 1981.

*784Gerard K. Donovan, Donovan, Weston & Spears, P. A. by Gerard K. Donovan, Tulsa, for petitioner.

Baker & Baker, Jay C. Baker, Tulsa, for respondent.

DOOLIN, Justice:

May the State Workers’ Compensation Court award a claimant a higher disability award than was recommended by *any*of the expert witnesses? We answer in the negative.

The facts, briefly stated, are that the respondent (claimant) was injured while working on the job for the petitioner (employer). Liability is not questioned, only the amount of permanent partial disability awarded by the Compensation Court.

At trial, claimant’s physician testified he found claimant 40 percent permanently partially disabled; employer’s physician found claimant 15 percent disabled; and the court-appointed physician found claimant 45 percent disabled.

The trial court found claimant 60 percent disabled and ordered award on that amount. This verdict was affirmed on appeal to the court en banc. Employer appealed.

Claimant argues that the trier of fact is not bound by the opinions of experts concerning the ultimate issues. He cites an Oklahoma case, *Enid v. Crow,*316 P.2d 834 (Okl.1934), and a “rule” from Am.Jur.2d to the effect that the trial jury may reject expert evidence if it is inconsistent with the facts of the case and otherwise unreasonable. He also cites testimony by claimant’s physician that claimant cannot perform the type of heavy work which he was doing prior to the accident, and concluded that claimant is 100 percent disabled *for that type of work.*

We disagree with claimant’s conclusions and his law.

We have said that although the Workers’ Compensation Court may “accept the testimony of one expert while rejecting that of another,” in the end “the basic requirement is that an award of compensation be within the limits expressed by skilled experts in evaluating extent of disability.” *Goombi v. Trent,*531 P.2d 1363 (Okl.1975).

We have further noted that in a disability case, the question is one of science and *must*be proved by expert testimony. In the absence of this expert testimony to establish cause and extent of injury, evidence is insufficient to sustain a finding of accidental injury resulting in disability. *Chromalloy-American, Oklahoma Division v. Wright,*567 P.2d 71 (Okl.1977).

With *Goombi*to direct us we reverse and remand to the Workers’ Compensation Court with instructions to set an award of disability consistent with the holding of this opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

IRWIN, C. J., BARNES, V. C. J. and HODGES, LAVENDER, SIMMS, HAR-GRAVE and OP ALA, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-842]



[[Page 2549]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Grants for Injury Control Research Centers (Panel 
3), Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) CE12-001, Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned SEP:

    Time and Date: 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m., February 21-22, 2012 (Closed).
    Place: Crowne Plaza Atlanta Perimeter Hotel at Ravinia, 4355 
Ashford Dunwoody Rd, Atlanta, Georgia 30346 Telephone: (770) 395-
7700.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in 
response to ``Grants for Injury Control Research Centers, Panel 3, 
FOA CE12-001.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Donald Blackman, Ph.D., 
M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway NE., 
Mailstop F63, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, Telephone (770) 488-0641.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: January 11, 2012.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012-842 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
391 A.2d 704

#### Commonwealth v. Williams, Appellant.

Argued November 23, 1977.

Ralph J. Gappy, Public Defender, for appellant; Robert E. Colville, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

HOFFMAN and SPAETH, JJ., concurred in the result.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.