alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The State, ex rel. Sullens, Appellant, *v.*Littleton, City Mgr., et al., Appellees.

(No. 31398

Decided December 15, 1948.)

*422
      *Mr. Paul L. Selby, Jr.,*and *Mr. Robert Bow Hamilton,*for appellant. •

*Mr. Lowell C. Thompson,*city solicitor, for appellees..

Sohngen, J.

The city of Portsmouth was confronted in 1942 with an emergency in its police department when the man-power requirements of our country’s war effort were at their highest peak. Younger men of' the police department were entering the armed services and it became impossible to maintain adequate-police protection for the city without changing the age-limit for patrolmen provided by the city civil service-commission regulation.

In order to provide adequate police protection and at the same time to provide for the reinstatement of' those patrolmen who might return from the war seeking their former positions, the civil service regulations were amended to permit, as a temporary emergency measure, applicants of more advanced age to-take the examination for position of patrolman.

Sullens knew that his appointment was of a limited tenure, and there was no evidence of misunderstanding on his part and no evidence of any fraud practiced' upon him. By his own act he estopped himself from successfully claiming any of the privileges or benefits-conferred by the civil service laws, and he cannot now complain when he is separated from his employment in accordance with the specific terms of his own agreement.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

In view of our decision, it becomes unnecessary for *423us to pass upon the question pertaining to the statutory requirements in connection with Sullens’ removal ■and his appeal therefrom.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman and ’ Stewart, JJ., concur.

Turner, J., not participating.
EXHIBIT 32

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

GOLD KIST INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gold Kist Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John Bekkers, President and Chief Executive Officer, and principal executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ John Bekkers                     
|John Bekkers                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|August 9, 2006                       



---

EXHIBIT 32

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

GOLD KIST INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gold Kist Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Stephen O. West, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, and principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Stephen O. West                    
|Stephen O. West                        
|Chief Financial Officer, Vice President
|                                       
|August 9, 2006
PCA : 12-3J14-24-B-0146 

PURCHASE AWARD DESCRIPTION 

February 16, 2024 12:30:00 

The Department of Agriculture (USDA) purchased Dried Fruit products as indicated below for distribution 

to the child nutrition and other related domestic food assistance programs for Fiscal Year 2024. 

The purchase is the result of offers received in response to Solicitation No. 2000009784 dated February 

13, 2024. 

The Dried Fruit products were purchased on an f.o.b. destination basis. Deliveries are to be made from 

April 1, 2024 through June 30, 2024. 

Further information can be obtained from the Commodity Procurement Staff, Agricultural Marketing Service,

 USDA, Room 3522 South Building, Washington, DC 20250, or the website at http://www.ams.usda.gov/sellingfood. 

Number of Offers/Quotes(Vendor Responses) received: 8 

PURCHASE SUMMARY 

Material Total Qty UOM Price Range Total Dollars 

CHERRIES DRIED PKG-4/4 LB 7,392.000 CS $76.0000 - $76.0000 $ 

561,792.00 

CHERRIES DRIED TART PKG-250/1.36 3,168.000 CS $110.2657 - $110.9757 $ 

OZ 350,430.54 

CRANBERRIES DRIED PKG-300/1.16 OZ 3,000.000 CS $47.4325 - $47.7625 $ 

142,792.50 

RAISINS BOX-144/1.33 OZ 5,928.000 CS $23.3100 - $25.1600 $ 

143,665.08 

TOTAL 19,488.000 CS $ 1,198,680.12 

PURCHASE DETAILS 

Contractor/ Material Plant Bid Inv. Destination Quantity UOM Price 

Contract Number Location Item 

CHERRY CENTRAL 

COOPERATIVE INC 

P.O. BOX 988 

TRAVERSE CITY, MI 

49685-0988 

12-3J14-24-C-0999 PAYSON, UT 

4100029339 

CHERRIES DRIED PKG-4/4 LB 

40 PAYSON, UT 1,848.000CS $ 

76.0000 

50 PAYSON, UT 1,848.000CS $ 

76.0000 

50 PAYSON, UT 1,848.000CS $ 

76.0000 

70 PAYSON, UT 924.000CS $ 
 Page 2 / 3 

Contractor/ Material Plant Bid Inv. Destination Quantity UOM Price 

Contract Number Location Item 

76.0000 

80 PAYSON, UT 924.000CS $ 

76.0000 

Subtotal 7,392.000CS 

Contract Total 7,392.000CS $ 561,792.00 

Contractor Total 7,392.000 CS $ 561,792.00 

STUTZ PACKING 

COMPANY 

82689 Ave 45 

Indio, CA 92201-2386 

12-3J14-24-C-1000 Indio, CA 

4100029340 

CHERRIES DRIED TART PKG-250/1.36 OZ 

110 LAS VEGAS, 1,584.000CS $ 

NV 110.2657 

130 ALBUQUERQU 792.000CS $ 

E, NM 110.9557 

140 ALBUQUERQU 792.000CS $ 

E, NM 110.9757 

Subtotal 3,168.000CS 

Contract Total 3,168.000CS $ 350,430.53 

Contractor Total 3,168.000 CS $ 350,430.53 

VICTOR PACKING, INC. 

11687 Rd 27 1/2 

Madera, CA 93637-9440 

12-3J14-24-C-1001 Madera, CA 

4100029341 

RAISINS BOX-144/1.33 OZ 

220 FRESNO, CA 1,482.000CS $ 

23.3100 

230 SACRAMENTO 1,482.000CS $ 

, CA 23.3100 

250 NEWARK, NJ 1,482.000CS $ 

25.1600 
 Page 3 / 3 

Contractor/ Material Plant Bid Inv. Destination Quantity UOM Price 

Contract Number Location Item 

260 VINELAND, 

NJ

Subtotal

CRANBERRIES DRIED PKG-300/1.16 OZ 

170 FRESNO, CA

190 LAS VEGAS, 

NV

Subtotal

 1,482.000CS 

 5,928.000CS 

 1,500.000CS 

 1,500.000CS 

 3,000.000CS 

$ 

$ 

$ 

25.1600 

47.4325 

47.7625 

Contract Total 8,928.000CS $ 286,457.58 

Contractor Total 8,928.000 CS $ 286,457.58
EPA DR# 3960 

1/08/2010
EPA DR# 3960 

1/08/2010
EPA DR# 3960 

1/08/2010
Dismissed and Opinion Filed July 31, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00491-CV 

FLORA ANDERSON, Appellant 

V. 

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-01422-D 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By 

postcard dated April 16, 2015, we notified appellant the $195 filing fee was due. We directed 

appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to 

do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated April 16, 2015, we notified 

appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant to file 

the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so might 

result in dismissal of this appeal. By letter dated June 11, 2015, we informed appellant the 

clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to pay 

for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements 

to pay for the clerk’s record or written documentation that appellant had been found to be 
 –2– 

entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would 

result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the 

filing fee, filed the docketing statement, provided the required documentation, or otherwise 

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the clerk’s record. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 37.3(b); 42.3(b),(c). 

150491F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

FLORA ANDERSON, Appellant 

No. 05-15-00491-CV V. 

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE 

ASSOCIATION, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 4, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-01422-D. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION 

recover its costs of this appeal from appellant FLORA ANDERSON. 

Judgment entered July 31, 2015.
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Blackhawk Capital Group
BDC, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Craig A.
Zabala, as acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereto certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
  1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Act of 1934; and
  2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: May 14, 2009/s/ Craig A. ZabalaCraig
      A. ZabalaActing Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
 
 A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been provided to Blackhawk Capital Group BDC Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in
this report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial
reporting.
  By: /s/ James A. Calder

James A. CalderChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
HPMSVtypeID yearID HPMSBaseYearVMT baseYearOffNetVMT 10 2015 8152640 0 20 2015 1174133460 0 30 2015 747520730 0 40 2015 5012910 0 50 2015 57748110 0 60 2015 104859755 0
Page 1 of 1 

Department of Defense Comments on the 

Draft Charge to External Reviewers for the IRIS Toxicological Review of Urea, June 2010 

Comments submitted by: Chemical Material Risk Management Directorate 

 Organization: Department of Defense Date Submitted: 2 July 2010 

*Comment categories: Science or methods (S); Editorial, grammar/spelling, clarifications needed (E); or Other (O). Also please inoutcome, conclusions or implementation of the assessment. 

Comment 

No. Section 

Page & 

Paragraph 

(enter 

“Global” if 

report 

sectionwide) 

Comment Suggested Action, R

and References (if n

1 General 

Charge Questions 

Question #1 Add some adjective or adverb, as appropriate, to 

evaluate the scientific accuracy of the analysis, i.e., the equivalent of “scientifically justified” in thequestions in the other sections. 

In addition to “logical, clear 

“accurate”. In addition to “cl

synthesized” add “and accur
**Exhibit        32.1**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |                                  |                 |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                                   | **SNB BANCSHARES, INC.**              |
|                              |                             |            |
| Date:   August 12, 2005 | By:                         | /s/ Harvey Zinn |
|                                   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                   |                                       |
EXHIBIT 10.23


Robert R. MacDonald                                               August 8, 2005
Ovation Products Corporation
395 East Dunstable Road
Nashua, New Hampshire 03062

RE: RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL

Dear Bob:

This Letter Agreement is further to our discussions regarding the manufacturing
of Ovation Product's ("Ovation") Clean Water Appliances ("CWA") and/or any
components integral to such appliances.

This shall confirm our agreement relative to the manufacturing by INSEQ
Corporation ("INSEQ") of the CWA and/or components for the CWA on the following
terms:

      Right of First Refusal. In the event that Ovation at any time desires to
contract with outside contractors to manufacture the CWA, or subassemblies for
the CWA, and with the exception of prototypes of the CWA that Ovation desires to
manufacture directly and with exception to the control system being manufactured
by SJE Rhombus, Ovation shall notify INSEQ of its manufacturing and other needs
and the best pricing offered to Ovation for such manufacturing needs and permit
INSEQ to make a proposal to meet Ovation's needs. INSEQ must reply to Ovation's
notice within 5 days of the date of such notice, indicating whether INSEQ
accepts or declines to make such proposal. If INSEQ elects to make such
proposal, it will submit its proposal within 15 days. Ovation shall be required
to use INSEQ to manufacture the CWA and/or components for the CWA in the event
that INSEQ makes a proposal and the proposal is at least as good to Ovation as
any competing proposal or otherwise at Ovation's sole discretion.

      Prototype Manufacturing Services at Cost. As part of the consideration for
this Letter Agreement, INSEQ agrees that, to the extent of its abilities, it
shall provide Ovation with any and all manufacturing services relative to
Ovation's development of prototypes for the CWA and/or components of the CWA at
cost.

      Related Party - Best Efforts Cooperation. The parties hereto acknowledge
that they are both portfolio companies of GreenShift Corporation, and that both
Ovation and INSEQ hereby agree to use their best efforts to cooperate with each
other to assist each other in their respective development plans.

      Termination. This Right of First Refusal shall terminate December 31, 2007
unless extended by mutual agreement of Ovation and INSEQ.

Your signature below shall indicate your agreement with the above conditions.
Thank you and we look forward to working with you.

                                            Best Regards,
                                            I N S E Q   C O R P O R A T I O N

                                            /s/ Kevin Kreisler
                                            ------------------
                                            Kevin Kreisler
                                            Chairman
Agreed and Accepted to by:

OVATION PRODUCTS

By: /s/ Robert M. MacDonald
    -----------------------
Robert R. MacDonald
Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10943 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus KENNETH LEE WILLIS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CR-40-ALL-H

- - - - - - - - - - June 15, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Kenneth Lee Willis challenges his convictions for two counts of possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) on the basis that the district court’s instruction to the jury was erroneous under United States v. Gaudin , 515 U.S. 506 (1995). This argument is precluded by this court’s decision in United States v. Parker , 104 F.3d 72, 72-73 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied , 520 U.S. 1223 (1997). AFFIRMED.
IV 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 500

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Pacific Maritime Association and 

the International Longshore and Warehouse Union should enter into 

mediation to resolve the ongoing west coast port shutdown and that 

other options should be taken if these negotiations fail. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 7, 2002

Mr. GRAVES submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Pacific Maritime 

Association and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union should enter into mediation to resolve the 

ongoing west coast port shutdown and that other options 

should be taken if these negotiations fail.

Whereas the ongoing dispute between the Pacific Maritime 

Association and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union has resulted in the shutdown of 29 west 

coast ports; 

Whereas this dispute has sent harmful economic reverberations far beyond the shipping industry, the west coast, 

and even the United States border; 
2

•HCON 500 IH 

Whereas 7 percent of the Nation’s gross domestic product 

travels through these ports and the flow of goods in and 

out of these ports is critical to the operation of businesses, farms, factories, retailers, and consumers all over 

the United States; 

Whereas the stay of all west coast transport by sea has already prevented farmers from selling their crops, shut 

down manufacturing plants, idled truck drivers and 

trains, and precluded consumers from purchasing goods; 

Whereas due to this interruption in the flow of commerce, 

thousands of Americans are laid off and living without a 

paycheck through no fault of their own; 

Whereas the United States is already enduring an economic 

recession and high unemployment; and 

Whereas if the shutdown of the west coast ports continues, 

it will present a serious threat to the Nation’s safety and 

health: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) the Pacific Maritime Association and the 

4 International Longshore and Warehouse Union 

5 should enter into mediation while adopting 24-hour 

6 extensions of the expired collective bargaining agree7 ment; and 

8 (2) if a settlement is not reached, the President 

9 should direct the Attorney General to petition any 

10 district court of the United States having jurisdic-
3

•HCON 500 IH 

1 tion of the parties to enjoin such strike or lock-out 

2 or the continuing thereof.

Æ
### TEX A S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-05-00539- CV Boa r d of Re ge nt s o f

th e Te xa s St at e Unive r sity Sy st e m, Al an D r e e be n, Ke ntAda ms , Do n Fl or e s, Jim myHay le y, Do r a A lc ala , J ohn D udle y, Be r nie Fr anc is, Pollyann a Stephens, and Ch ancellor Charles M atthews, Appellan ts v. Lamar Ur banovs ky, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COU NTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRI CT NO. GN502558 , HONO RABLE SUZANNE COVINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Appellants have filed an unopposed m otion to dismiss their appea l, stating that they have se ttl e d th e ir dis pute wi th a pp e lle e . W e gr ant t

he mot ion

and dis mis s the a

pp e a l. T e x. R. App. P . 42. 1(a) .

__________________________________________ D avid P ur year , Justice B efor e C hief Justice L aw, Justices B . A. S mith and P ur year D ismiss ed on Appe llants’ M otion F iled: Januar y 27, 2006