alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 63 (Monday, April 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 19661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7774]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12470-001]


City of Broken Bow, OK; Notice of Technical Conference

March 21, 2012.
    Take notice that a technical conference will be held to discuss the 
section 4(e) conditions filed by the U.S. Forest Service on November 
16, 2007 for the Broken Bow Re-Regulation Dam Hydroelectric Project No. 
12470.
    This conference will be held on Wednesday, April 25, 2012, 
beginning at 9:30 a.m. (CDT) at the U.S. Forest Service's Hochatown 
Office, Route 4, Broken Bow, OK 74728.
    All local, state, and federal agencies, Indian tribes, and other 
interested parties are invited to participate. There will be no 
transcript of the conference. Please contact Aaron Liberty at (202) 
502-6862 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#90d1f1e2fffebedcf9f2f5e2e4e9d0f6f5e2f3bef7ffe6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="521333203d3c7c1e3b303720262b12343720317c353d24">[email protected]</span></a> by April 5, 2012, to RSVP.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-7774 Filed 3-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 449 Agreed to House (ATH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 449

 Providing for representation by Congress at a special meeting in New 
              York, New York on Friday, September 6, 2002.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2002

   Mr. Armey (for himself, Mr. Gephardt, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Gilman, Mr. 
     Fossella, and Mr. Nadler) submitted the following concurrent 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for representation by Congress at a special meeting in New 
              York, New York on Friday, September 6, 2002.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That: (a) The Speaker of the House of Representatives (in consultation 
with the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives), with respect 
to the House of Representatives, and the President pro tempore of the 
Senate (in consultation with the Majority Leader and the Minority 
Leader of the Senate), with respect to the Senate, may send such 
Representatives, Senators and other appropriate persons, to a special 
meeting of Congress and related events to be held on Friday, September 
6, 2002 in New York, New York, in remembrance of the terrorist attacks 
of September 11, 2001, and in recognition of the City of New York for 
the harm it sustained and its recovery.
    (b) Attendees under subsection (a) shall be led by the Speaker and 
the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, and by the 
President pro tempore (or his designee), Majority Leader, and the 
Minority Leader of the Senate.
    Sec. 2. The Congress may accept the offer of the City of New York 
and entities controlled by the City of New York to host and pay the 
expenses of the Congress to prepare, attend, and participate in the 
special meeting of September 6, 2002, and related events of that day, 
referred to in section 1.
    Sec. 3. On behalf of the Congress, the officers of the House of 
Representatives and the officers of the Senate may make arrangements 
with the City of New York and other required entities and agencies for 
participation by the Congress for the purposes designated under this 
resolution.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: March 1, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Kimberly K. SchaeferKimberly K. SchaeferChief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report (the "Report") of Rand Logistics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 9, 2010/s/ Laurence S. LevyLaurence S. Levy

Chairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-122-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6504** 

MARC WAYNE PERSONIUS , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Liam O’Grady , District Judge. ( 1:12

- cv - 01096

- LO

- JFA )

Submitted : June 13, 2013 Decided: June 18, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Marc Wayne Personius, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Marc Wayne Personius seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relie f on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Personius has not made the requis ite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th i s court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
IV 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 483

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make technical 

corrections in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1646. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2002

Mr. HYDE (for himself and Mr. LANTOS) submitted the following concurrent 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make 

technical corrections in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1646.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 1646) 

3 to authorize appropriations for the Department of State 

4 for fiscal year 2003, to authorize appropriations under the 

5 Arms Export Control Act and the Foreign Assistance Act 

6 of 1961 for security assistance for fiscal year 2003, and 

7 for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of Representa8 tives shall insert at the appropriate place the following new 

9 section (and conform the table of contents accordingly):
2

•HCON 483 ATH 

1 SEC. 1309. THREE-YEAR INTERNATIONAL ARMS CONTROL 

2 AND NONPROLIFERATION STRATEGY. 

3 Not later than 180 days after the date of the enact4 ment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall prepare and 

5 submit to the appropriate congressional committees a 3-

6 year international arms control and nonproliferation strat7 egy. The strategy shall contain the following: 

8 (1) A 3-year plan for the reduction of existing 

9 nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and bal10 listic missiles and for controlling the proliferation of 

11 these weapons. 

12 (2) Identification of the goals and objectives of 

13 the United States with respect to arms control and 

14 nonproliferation of weapons of mass destruction and 

15 their delivery systems. 

16 (3) A description of the programs, projects, and 

17 activities of the Department of State intended to ac18 complish goals and objectives described in paragraph 

19 (2).

Æ
EXHIBIT 23.1




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report  included in this Form 10-K, into LifeCell Corporation's previously filed
Registration  Statements  File  No.  33-90740,  File  No.  333-20093,  File  No.
333-62701,  File  No.  333-62491  and  File  No.  333-94715.


/S/ ARTHUR  ANDERSEN  LLP


Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania
     March  29,  2000


<PAGE>
May 28, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CHARLIE JONES, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00102-CV V.

SOUTH WEST PAINT & BODY SHOP LP, B & B MAIN ST AUTO STORAGE, 

CITY OF BELLAIRE, Appellees

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on February 2, 2015. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Charlie Jones.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
**UN PUBLISHED**  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7158** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. COREY LEVON JOYNER , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Elizabeth City
. James C. Fox , Senior District Judge. ( 2:07

- cr - 00016

- F

- 1; 2:08

- cv - 00034

- F )

Submitted : November 30, 2010 Decided: December 7, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.
Affirmed in par t ; d ismiss ed in part by un published per curiam opinion
. Corey Levon Joyner, Appellant Pro Se
. Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr. , Assistant United States Attorney s , Raleigh , North Carolina , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not bindin g precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Corey Levon Joyner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motions filed pursuant to 28
U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) , and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) . The district court’s denial of J oyner’s § 2255 motion is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debata ble or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is d ebatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Joyner has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a cert ificate of appealability and dismiss the portion of the appeal denying § 2255 relief
.3 Turning to the district court’s denial of Joyner’s § 3582(c) motion, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm this portion of the order for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Joyner , Nos. 2:07

- cr - 00016

- F

- 1; 2:08

- cv - 00034

- F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material s b efore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  May 15, 2009
    /s/ Robert K. MoskovitzName:
    Robert K. MoskovitzTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner
The Board of Directors
Avado Brands, Inc.

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 33-49748, No. 33-68978, No. 333-3764, and No. 333-3736) on Form S-8 and the
registration  statements (No.  333-02958,  No. 333-37345,  and No. 333-25205) on
Form S-3 of Avado Brands,  Inc. (formerly Apple South, Inc.) of our report dated
January 29, 1999,  relating to the consolidated  balance sheets of Avado Brands,
Inc. as of January 3, 1999 and  December  28, 1997 and the related  consolidated
statements of earnings,  shareholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash
flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period  ended  January  3, 1999,
which report  appears in the January 3, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Avado
Brands, Inc.

KPMG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 30, 1999
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 14, 2007
    
    /s/ Robert K. MoskovitzName: Robert K. MoskovitzTitle: Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner
Order entered July 19, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00153-CR

JOSHUA CORNELL SKINNER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F15-20176-Q

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s July 18, 2017 motion for extension of time to file his 

brief. We DENY his motion as moot.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Liang Zhang, Chief Executive
Officer of Synutra International, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his
knowledge, that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months
ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      February 9, 2009/s/
      Liang ZhangName:
      Liang ZhangTitle: Chief Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The
foregoing certification is being furnished with the Company’s Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
Order entered May 22, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 00363 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF K .G., ET. AL, CHILDREN On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 13 - 17435 - Z



### O RDER Because this is an accelerated appeal from a decree terminating appellant’s parental rights, we GRANT appellant’s May 19, 2015 motion for additional time to file brief to the extent
we ORDER the brief be filed no later than June 11, 2015
. We ca ution appellant that no further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS PRESIDING JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Patrick Bratton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 15, 2007



/s/ Patrick BrattonPatrick BrattonChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Liang Zhang, Chief Executive
Officer of Synutra International, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his
knowledge, that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      August 10, 2009
              /s/ Liang ZhangName:
      Liang ZhangTitle: Chief Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.




The
foregoing certification is being furnished with the Company’s Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT OF


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION





I, Scott Cooke, certify that:





(a)  A review of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s activities and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 15, 2021 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as
        seller, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”) and sponsor, and Toyota Auto Receivables 2021-D Owner Trust, as issuer, during the period from November 15, 2021 to December 31, 2021 has been made under my
        supervision.










March 28, 2022





By:  /s/ Scott Cooke


Scott Cooke


Senior Vice President


Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as Servicer of


Toyota Auto Receivables 2021-D Owner Trust
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 248 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 248

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 17, 2001

        Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress that public schools may display 
  the words ``God Bless America'' as an expression of support for the 
                                Nation.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that

public schools may display the words ``God Bless America'' as an 
expression of support for the Nation.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 16, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```