alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1




Splinex
      Technology Inc.


550
      West
      Cypress Creek Road-Suite 410


Ft.
      Lauderdale, Florida, 33309




January
      10, 2008




Securities
      and Exchange Commission


100
      F
      Street, NE


Washington,
      DC 20549




Re:
      Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350




Dear
      Ladies and Gentlemen:




In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Splinex
      Technology Inc., for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, I, Gerard Herlihy,
      President and Chief Financial Officer of Splinex Technology Inc., hereby certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1)
            such
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Splinex Technology Inc., for the
                quarter ended June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements
                of
                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
            the
                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
                Splinex
                Technology Inc., for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, fairly presents,
                in
                all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of Splinex Technology Inc.




BY:
                /s/ Gerard A. Herlihy
              Gerard
                Herlihy
              President
                and Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer, Principal Financialand
              Accounting
                Officer and Duly Authorized
                Officer)










A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to Splinex Technology Inc. and
      will be retained by Splinex Technology Inc. and furnished to the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




In
      accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-B, this certification is
      being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to Splinex Technology Inc.’s quarterly
      report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the
      liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference
      in
      any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as
      expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ ABRAXIS BIOSCIENCE, LLC, Plaintiff

- Appellant

,

v.

MICHELLE K. LEE, DEPUTY UNDER SECRETA RY OF COMMERCE FOR INTE LLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DEPUTY DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Defendant

- Appellee

.

______________________

2014

- 1330

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District o f Columbia in No. 1:11

- cv

- 00730

- BAH, Judge Beryl A. Howell.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

Before P ROST , Chief Judge

, W ALLACH and T ARANTO , Circuit Judges

. P ROST , C hief Judge

. O R D E R Case: 14-1330 Document: 14 Page: 1 Filed: 06/18/2014ABRAXIS BIOSCIENCE
, LLC v. LEE 2

The parties jointly move to remand to the district court in light of Novartis AG v. Lee , 740 F.3d 593 (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Based on Novartis

, the parties agree that the patent term adjustment at issue in this appeal should be 323 days. Thus, the parties se ek a remand with instructions for the district court to vacate the portion of its judgment denying the patent term adjustment and further instru ctions to remand to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for the purpose of recalculating the patent term adjus tment.
Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion is granted. The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order.
(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s30

ISSUED AS A MANDATE : June 18, 2014 Case: 14-1330 Document: 14 Page: 2 Filed: 06/18/2014
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40624

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff-Respondent

,

v.

JASON RAYMOND TORRES

,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 652

Filed: September 3, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS I S AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fif th Judicial District, State of Idaho, Gooding County. Hon. John K. Butler , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years , for lewd conduct with a minor child under

sixteen

, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Sarah E. Tompkins, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before LANSING, Judge; GRATTON, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Jason Raymond Torres pled guilty to lewd conduct with a minor child under sixteen

. Idaho Code § 18

- 1508 . The district court sentenced Torres to a unified term of twenty years,

with a minimum period of confinement of five years

. Torres appeals asserting that the district

court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.

Sentencing is a matter f or the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 101 1, 1014

-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.2 1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed t he record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Torres ’ judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket** Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 0864 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM023AD

767 -57A0102, R3 --- 12/2/10 767 -57A0102, R2 --- 1/7/10 767 -57A0102, R1 --- 11/27/07 767 -57A0100, R2 --- 5/20/10 767 -57A0100, R1 --- 6/19/08 767 -57A0100 --- 8/21/06

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplementa l AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
III 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 628 

To authorize document production by the Select Committee on Intelligence 

in United States v. Paul J. Manafort, Jr. (D.D.C.) 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2018 

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize document production by the Select Committee 

on Intelligence in United States v. Paul J. Manafort, 

Jr. (D.D.C.) 

Whereas, the prosecution in United States v. Paul J. 

Manafort, Jr., Cr. No. 17–201, currently pending in the 

United States District Court for the District of Columbia, has requested a copy of a transcript of an interview 

of W. Samuel Patten conducted by the Select Committee 

on Intelligence; 

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States 

and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be taken 

from such control or possession but by permission of the 

Senate; 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 628 ATS 

Whereas, when it appears that documents, papers, and 

records under the control or in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate 

will take such action as will promote the ends of justice 

consistent with the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Chairman and Vice Chairman of 

2 the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, acting joint3 ly, are authorized to provide to the prosecution in United 

4 States v. Paul J. Manafort, Jr., under appropriate security 

5 procedures, a copy of the transcript of the Committee’s 

6 interview of W. Samuel Patten and exhibits referenced in 

7 the interview. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Permitted Commercial Oil Disposal Facilities

County Name of Facility Operator Contact Name Phone Number Mailing Address

Campbell McBeth Pit Jim's Water Service Randy Elliot 307-682-4051 P.O. Box 2290 Campbell Kissicks Disposal Pit Kissicks Water Service Jo Kissicks 307-682-9026 P.O. Box 46 Campbell Pumpkin Buttes WestWater John Todd 303-888-2833 P.O. Box 670 Campbell Holler SWD 1-11 Pit JCG, LLC Jeff Gray 307-682-2706 12301 N. Highway 59 Carbon Mexican Flats Devon Energy Brent Wilson 307-383-3000 P.O. Box 129 Carbon Samson Resources Samson Resources James Smith 918-591-1462 Two West Second StrCarbon Stateline Energy - Wamsutter Stateline Energy John Todd 303-888-2833 P.O. Box 670 Carbon Southern Cross Southern Cross Keith Haack 307-380-8277 P.O. Box 94 Converse Werner Ranch Jim's Water Service Doug Robertson 307-351-8475 P.O. Box 61 Converse Cannon Land and Livestock Jim's Water Service Doug Robertson 307-351-8475 P.O. Box 61 Converse North Bill Disposal North Bill Disposal Jack Amen 307-358-1885 P.O. Box 403 Converse Ross Recovery Ross Recovery Ryan Igo 307-358-4905 P.O. Box 1311 Converse Hornbuckle Ranch Pate Environmental Kerry Smith 214-691-1713 12160 North Abrams RJohnson Parkman Reservoir High Plains Resources Dennis Lawrence 307-684-9475 P.O. Box 370 Johnson Linch Pit Sierra Construction Company Russ Linch 307-437-6319 P.O. Box 210 Laramie Silo Field R360 - Niobrara Colton Ellingford 307-679-5804 P.O. Box 1117 Lincoln Moxa Arch North Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Tim Kalus 720-929-6849 1099 18th Street, SuitSublette Anticline Disposal Anticline Disposal Jesse Eubanks 307-360-3390 P.O. Box 273 Sublette Calpet - LaBarge R360 Colton Ellingford 307-679-5804 P.O. Box 1117 Sublette McGinnis ExxonMobile Larry R. Corff 307‐276‐6652 PO Box 366 Sweetwater Sweetwater Disposal (formerly Hyland) Jim's Water Service Lewie Dodge 307-320-6119 P.O. Box 2 Sweetwater North Wamsutter Pond BP America Production Co. Jack Engstrom 307-328-3700 P.O. Box 157 Sweetwater R&G/Shute Creek R360 Colton Ellingford 307-679-5804 P.O. Box 1117 Sweetwater South Wamsutter Pond BP America Production Co. Jack Engstrom 307-328-3789 P.O. Box 157 Sweetwater Moxa Arch South Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Tim Kalus 720-929-6848 1099 18th Street, SuitSweetwater Jolley Ranch Company Jolley Ranch Company Sally Jolley 307-389-4419 P.O. Box 97 Sweetwater Red Desert Red Desert Water Reclamation Brian Blevins 303-886-7969 HC 31, Box 4 Sweetwater Polar Bear Polar Bear Water Treatment John Boysen 307-742-5651 715 Grand Avenue Uinta Calpet - Evanston R360 Colton Ellingford 307-679-5804 P.O. Box 1117 Uinta D&B Disposal Systems D&B Disposal Systems Rhonda Ruckle 307-782-3799 P.O. Box 148 Washakie Oilfield Disposal Services Oilfield Disposal Services, Inc. Reuben Tarver 307-689-6275 P.O. Box 668 

Revised:
'( 

SERVED: March 5, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

DENNIS MCGLYNN 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO; FAA 2013-0615 

ORDER CHANGING VENUE 

AND 

AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING DATE 

Dennis McGlynn (hereinafter "Respondent') filed a Motion for Change of Location of 

Hearing on February 14, 2014. The Federal Av'iationAdministration (hereinafter 

"Agency") has not responded. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent's Motion for Change of Location of Hearing having been 

read and considered, it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 

1. Respondent's Motion is GRANTED; and 

2. NOTICE IS HEREBY,GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and 

considered on May 14 and 15,2014, inclusive, in the U.S. Tax Court: Room 

2-1350, U.S. Tax Court, Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, 450 

Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102; and 

3. Hearings will commence at 9:00a.m. and conclude at 4:30p.m. each day. 

Settled cases will not be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the proper 

pleading(s). Pleadings may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or postal service. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

ONE COPY 

Fred M. Morellli, Jr., Respondent's Counsel 

Law Offices of Morelli & Rival 

P.O. Box 1416 

Aurora, IL 60507-1416 

TEL: 630-892-6665 

Dennis J. McGlynn, Respondent 

659 Dorothy Way 

Auburn, CA 95603-3862 

Christopher Merrill, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, A WP-7 .3 

Western-Pacific Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P. 0. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7105 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant/Paralegal 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0615 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

. DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
#### The CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, the City of Monument, the City of Palmer Lake, the City of Manitou Springs, the City of Ramah, the City of Calhan, the City of Green Mountain Falls, the City of Fountain, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. The BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF EL PASO COUNTY, Leo Ververs, Terry Harris, Tom Collier, Jr., Charles Heim, Terry Salt, as members of the Board of County Commissioners of El Paso County, Sharon L. Shipley, as Treasurer of El Paso County, and William Fence, as El Paso County Budget Officer, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 81CA0704.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III.

April 1, 1982.

Rehearings Denied April 29, 1982.

Certiorari Denied July 12, 1982.

James G. Colvin, II, City Atty., Jackson L. Smith, Asst. City Atty., Colorado Springs, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Charles E. Berry, County Atty., Colorado Springs, for defendants-appellants Bd. of County Com’rs and William Fence.

Patrick R. Mahan, Jefferson County Atty., Cile Pace, Asst. County Atty., Colorado Springs, amicus curiae for Bd. of County Com’rs of Jefferson County.

Susan K. Griffiths, Denver, amicus curiae for Colorado Municipal League.

TURSI, Judge.

The defendants appeal the judgment of the trial court prohibiting the county from funding the county road and bridge fund created pursuant to § 43-2-202(1), C.R.S. 1973 by transfers from the general fund. The county claims authority to do so by virtue of § 29-1-111.5, C.R.S.1973 (1981 Cum.Supp.). Alternatively, the defendants contend that, when a county has initially funded the road and bridge fund by the levy provided for in § 43-2-202(1), it may supplement its own road and bridge budget by general fund transfers during the fiscal year pursuant to § 29-1-111.5. We affirm.

*Greeley v. Board of County Commissioners of Weld,*Colo.App., 644 P.2d 76 (No. 81CA0377 announced December 24, 1981) is dispositive of the issue of initial funding. Further, *Greeley v. Board of County Commissioners*gives guidance as to the issue of supplementing the county’s road and bridge fund from the general fund during the fiscal year. Section 30-25-106(1), C.R.S.1973 (1981 Cum.Supp.), reen*672acted by the General Assembly in 1979, specifically prohibits the transfer of county general fund money for expenditures for roads and bridges. We do not find this exclusion to be in conflict with the authority granted to counties under § 29-1-111.5 of the local government budget law of Colorado. *Greeley v. Board of County Commissioners, supra.*

Judgment affirmed.

STERNBERG and KIRSHBAUM, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ James A. CalderJames A. CalderChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert Noe MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 81SA168.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Jan. 17, 1983.

*1314Robert L. Russel, Dist. Atty., Daniel C. Zook, Deputy Dist. Atty., Colorado Springs, for plaintiff-appellant.

J. Gregory Walta, Colo. State Public Defender, Susan L. Fralick, Terri L. Brake, Deputy State Public Defenders, Denver, for defendant-appellee.

HODGES, Chief Justice.

The District Attorney for the Fourth Judicial District appeals the dismissal of felony escape charges against defendant Martinez. We reverse.

The defendant was convicted of aggravated motor vehicle theft under section 18-4-409, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8), a class four felony. He was sentenced and assigned to serve his sentence at the Community Corrections facility of El Paso County, a minimum security facility.

The defendant was charged with felony escape under section 18-8-208, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8). It was alleged that he signed out of the facility to visit his mother for several hours and never returned. He was apprehended about five months later.

On the date set for a preliminary hearing the defendant was not present in court with his counsel.

The preliminary hearing was reset. At that hearing, the defendant was again absent; however, it was made known to the trial court that the defendant did not appear because he was transferred to the penitentiary after he had breached the agreement he made upon being assigned to a community corrections facility. Absent substantive argument and over the vigorous objection of the District Attorney, the trial court dismissed the escape charge on the ground that the defendant had been transferred to the penitentiary, that this was his punishment for the escape, and that prosecution on the escape charge would constitute double jeopardy.

The record is sparse, however, it appears that the defendant, as a prisoner under sentence, was administratively transferred to the penitentiary after he failed to return to a minimum security facility. Such a situation does not involve double jeopardy. *See Schwickrath v. People,*159 Colo. 390, 411 P.2d 961 (1966) and *Silva v. People,*158 Colo. 326, 407 P.2d 38 (1965), which deal with superseded statutes. *Cf., Gregory v. Wyse,*512 F.2d 378, 382 (10th Cir.1975).

The judgment is reversed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40613

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JULIO GARCIA, also known as Chaparro,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CR-281-49

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Julio Garcia has moved for leave to 

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and 

supplemental letter, along with the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 16, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40613 Document: 00513639516 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2016
No. 15-40613

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-40613 Document: 00513639516 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2016
## State of N ew York Su p reme C ou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: May 21, 2015 519661

________________________________ In the Matter of ELIOT LOPEZ, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT ALBERT PRACK, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: March 31, 2015 Before: Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Rose and Devine, JJ.

__________ Eliot Lopez, Comstock, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Determination confirmed. No opinion. Peters, P.J., Egan Jr., Rose and Devine, JJ., concur.-2- 519661

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court