alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 68 (Monday, April 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8442]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL12-54-000]


Viridity Energy, Inc. v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.; Notice of 
Complaint

    Take notice that on March 29, 2012, pursuant to section 206 of the 
Rules and Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (Commission), 18 CFR 385.206 and section 206 of the Federal 
Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824(e), Viridity Energy, Inc. (Complainant) filed 
a formal complaint against PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (Respondent) 
alleging that a portion of a provision in the Respondent's Open Access 
Transmission Tariff, Emergency Load Response Program, is unjust, 
unreasonable, and unduly discriminatory.
    The Complainant states that copies of the complaint were served on 
representatives of the Respondent.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's 
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before 
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and 
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4c0a091e0f0322202522291f393c3c233e380c2a293e2f622b233a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="99dfdccbdad6f7f5f0f7fccaece9e9f6ebedd9fffcebfab7fef6ef">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 18, 2012.

    Dated: April 3, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8442 Filed 4-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Fw: Doug Nelson Memo, Re: EPA's permitting questions

Allison Wiedeman 

to: 

Jack Faulk 

12/07/2009 10:50 AM 

Show Details 

History: This message has been forwarded. 

Plse distribute and let's discuss 

----------------- 

Sent by EPA Wireless E-Mail Services 

 From: Paul Zimmerman [PZimmerman@croplifeamerica.org] 

 Sent: 12/07/2009 10:06 AM EST 

 To: Allison Wiedeman 

 Cc: Doug Nelson <DNelson@croplifeamerica.org> 

 Subject: Doug Nelson Memo, Re: EPA's permitting questions 

Dear Allison Wiedeman, 

 

Attached is a memorandum from Doug Nelson answering the EPA's permitting questions. 

 

Regards, 

 

Paul Zimmerman

Legal Administrative Assistant

CropLife America

pzimmerman@croplifeamerica.org

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\jfaulk\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web6968.htm 5/11/2010
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other
financial information included in this report fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial
reporting.
  By:/s/ James A. CalderJames A. CalderChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Clean Power Plan Public Hearing 

My name is Kathy Tolman and I live in Wheat Ridge, CO. I was born and raised in 

Denver and have spent the majority of my life in Colorado. I am second generation 

American and Coloradoan. I have 4 children and 7 grandchildren. My husband was 

Radon Tolman, who died a year and half ago. He was a mechanical engineer who 

spent his life developing a sustainable energy technology. In the 1970s Radon was 

working in Golden on his process and President Carter was trying to educate the 

people by putting solar panels on the White House roof. Congress passed the Clean 

Air Act in 1970 but there was a lot of resistance. This was many, many years before 

anyone was talking about climate change but a number of people felt that the Clean 

Air Act would cost jobs and the impact of the Act would be more negative than 

positive. A few people were trying to raise awareness but the resistance to change 

was significant. 

After Ronald Regan was elected President, the funding for alternative energy 

projects went away and we didn't talk about it much anymore. Denver also lost a lot 

of jobs because there were quite a few businesses seriously looking into alternative 

energy. Denver also went through a time when the "brown cloud" was a real 

problem. 

Since we voted in the renewable energy standard (RES) in 2004 under Governor 

Ritter, our air is much better and we usually don't have the "brown cloud". Denver 

is now known a clean city with healthy active citizens. Quality of life improves when 

there is less pollution. People are more healthy and able to participate in more 

outdoor activities. This really is a win-win situation. Now there is growing 

awareness about climate change and about the problems facing us-all of us. Our job 

is to continue work on educating people about the problems and being open to the 

solutions to these problems. 

Colorado now has a new energy economy that clearly shows that these solutions do 

produce jobs and is now creating significant economic growth. It is crucial that 

investing in clean energy technologies becomes easier and more attractive. 

What should we consider in the future? 

Increasingly, a carbon tax is being talked about. Even Henry Paulson, Secretary of 

the Treasury from 2006 to 2009 and a Republican businessman was quoted in the 

New York Times June 22 as seeing this as a way to create incentives to develop new, 

cleaner energy technologies . I hope we will seriously look at this as one of ways to 

continue to fund new technologies to solve our problems. 

Thank you for all your work on recommended carbon emission standards. Our 

health and that of our children and grandchildren is really affected what you are 

able to do.
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, CoreyHenry, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2021-3 (the“Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement inall material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included inthis report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: WilmingtonTrust, National Association. 

 
By: /s/ Corey HenryName:   Corey HenryTitle: 
President and Chief Executive Officer

SantanderDrive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor
 (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date: March 31, 2023**
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 71

Recognizing the importance of families and children in the United States

and expressing support for the goals and ideas of National FamilyDay.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 20, 2001

Mr. TOOMEY (for himself and Mr. ROEMER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and

the Workforce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the importance of families and children in the

United States and expressing support for the goals and

ideas of National FamilyDay.

Whereas national evidence indicates that America’s kids are

faced with oppressive issues such as violence, drugs,

abuse, and even family stress, causing the future of the

children of the United States, and therefore the future of

the Nation, to be at risk;

Whereas families in the United States, regardless of their

economic status, ethnic or cultural heritage, or geographic location, are experiencing the pressures caused by

contemporary society while trying to raise and nurture

emotionally healthy and physically safe children;
2

•HCON 71 IH

Whereas Americans realize the challenges of spending quality

family time together amidst today’s busy lifestyles and

balancing work schedules and kids’ activities to regularly

share a family meal;

Whereas it is imperative that the people of the United States

act willfully and purposely to secure a positive future for

the Nation by devoting time to family bonding, sharing

traditions, and communicating values to children in an

effort to sustain the importance of family;

Whereas KidsPeace, one of the Nation’s oldest, most comprehensive not-for-profit organizations dedicated to helping children attain the confidence and courage needed to

face and overcome crises, has established National

FamilyDay to focus unified attention on nurturing family

relationships and improving family communications

thereby helping to build strong families which give kids

peace;

Whereas National FamilyDay will be celebrated annually on

a Sunday in March; and

Whereas National FamilyDay will provide opportunities for

families to reclaim the family mealtime which fosters

trust and builds better communication, and will encourage parents, grandparents, and caregivers to recognize

the importance of being involved in the physical and emotional lives of their children: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) recognizes the importance of children and

4 families to the future of the United States;
3

•HCON 71 IH

1 (2) expresses support for the goals and ideas of

2 National FamilyDay as established by KidsPeace;

3 (3) encourages the people of the United States

4 to participate in local and national activities hon5 oring National FamilyDay; and

6 (4) believes that families who communicate and

7 spend time together create stronger families which

8 give kids peace.

Æ
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2016-3988 Directorate Identifier: 2015-NM-130-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Modification 8.0 $ 680.00 $892 $1,572.00 90 $141,480.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $141,480

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 66 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 66

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. PRINTING OF REVISED VERSION OF ``WOMEN IN CONGRESS, 1917-
              1990''.

    An updated version of House Document 101-238, entitled ``Women in 
Congress, 1917-1990'' (as revised by the Library of Congress), shall be 
printed as a House document by the Public Printer, with illustrations 
and suitable binding, under the direction of the Committee on House 
Administration of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 2. NUMBER OF COPIES.

    In addition to the usual number, there shall be printed 30,700 
copies of the document referred to in subsection (a), of which--
            (1) 25,000 shall be for the use of the Committee on House 
        Administration of the House of Representatives; and
            (2) 5,700 shall be for the use of the Committee on Rules 
        and Administration of the Senate.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 4, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 66

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the printing of a revised and updated version of the House 
          document entitled ``Women in Congress, 1917-1990''.
```
Dregon 

Kate Brown, Governor 

January 7, 2015 

Mr. Byron H. Huffman 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Acting Director, Office of Airport Compliance 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Dear Mr. Huffman, 

3040 25th Street, SE 

Salem, OR 97302-1125 

Phone: (503) 3 78-4880 

Toll Free: (800) 874-0102 

FAX: (503) 373-1688 

This letter is sent in response to your letter to Oregon Governor Kate Brown dated November 24, 

2015 relating to the FAA policy and procedures concerning the use of Airport Revenue; Proceeds 

from Taxes on Aviation Fuel, (79 Fed. Reg 6628 amendment). Your letter asked for statements of 

compliance with the policy. I am happy to report that the state of Oregon is in full compliance with 

the amendment as all state and local tax revenue on aviation fuel is returned to the aviation system. If 

you have any questions, my contact email is mitch.t.swecker@aviation.state.or.us and my phone 

number is 503-378-2340. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

Director 

Oregon Department of Aviation 

Cc: Karmen Fore 

Policy and Budget Analyst, Office of Chief Financial Officer, Thomas MacDonald 

Senior Legislative Analyst, Legislative Fiscal Office, Julie Neburka.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

EDGAR RAMIREZ-MARTINEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 20-10037 

 20-10038 

D.C. Nos. 

4:19-cr-50149-JAS-BGM-1 

4:19-cr-01926-JAS-BGM-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

James A. Soto, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 5, 2020**

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and LEE, Circuit Judges. 

In these consolidated appeals, Edgar Ramirez-Martinez appeals from his 

guilty-plea conviction and 54-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in 

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the revocation of supervised release and partially 

concurrent 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-10037 & 20-10038

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ramirez-Martinez’s counsel has filed a brief 

stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as

counsel of record. We have provided Ramirez-Martinez the opportunity to file a 

pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has 

been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief in these direct appeals. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**INTERLINEBRANDS, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Interline Brands, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 26, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Grebe,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| /S/  MICHAEL J. GREBE                                         |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael J. Grebe                                              |   |
| Chairman of the Board,  Chief Executive Officer and President |   |
| May 3,  2010                                             |   |

 

----