G/• NI• --7 

Indiana Air Permit Compliance lestlng 

General Shale Brick, Inc. 

Mooresville, Indiana 

Report on: 

Sttlilt r Dioxide Oxide.•_ 

H.l,drogen Chloride/H.rdroL, ett Flottride 

Particulate Matter <10 

Performed by: 

:\Air Analysis, Inc. 

Project Number: 447 

January 24, 2007 

AAir Analysis, Inc. 

3904Clarks Creek Road • Plainfield, Indiana 46168 

317.837.8514 

877.683.TEST 
Analysis, Inc. General Shale Brick, Inc. 

Project Number: 447 

DESCRIPTION OF SOURCE PROCESSES AND FIEI,D NOTES' 

One (1) brick manufacturing lines, identified as EU-002, consisting of the following: 

One (1) brick manufacturing line, identified as Line 2, installed in 1987, located at Plant No. 32, equipped with consisting of the following: 

* One (1) tunnel pre-dryer and one (1) tunnel dryer using waste heat from Line 2 Kiln, and one (1) coal and natural gas-fired kiln, identified as Line 2 Kiln, equipped with a dry lime injection baghouse, identified as DIFF-02, exhausting to Stack DIFF-02, rated at 25 million British thermal units per hour, capacity: 13.7 tons of bricks per hour. Pursuant to 40 CFR 63, Subpart JJJJJ, this is an existing affected source using an emissions control system to comply with the rule. 

• (B) One (1) mill room, identified as EU-P32-MR, equipped with a baghouse, identified as CD-P32-MR, capacity: 70 tons per hour. 

Actual recorded production material information is in Appendix. 
:i_kAir Analysis, Inc. General Shale Brick, Inc. 

Project Number: 447 

APPEND• Ii 

FIELD DATA PRINTOUTS 
SOURCE TESTED: Kih• 32 

COMPANY NAME: Gel•e•a! Sha!• Brick 

DATE OF TEST: 01/24/07 

Pollutant Emissions 

HCL Ibs/hr 

HF Ibs/hr 

SO2 ppm 

SO2 Ibs/hr 

"Nox ppm 

NOx Ibs/htr 

Run 1 

0.0577 

0.3402 

79.8500 

17.2850 

51.6700 

8.0450 

Run 2 

0.0673 

0.4900 

60.2000 

12.8775 

55.8400 

8.5917 

Run 3 

0.0640 

0.5345 

66.6900 

14.5911 

53.1400 

8.3627 

Average 

0.063O 

0.4549 

68.9133 

14.9179 

53.5500 

8.3331 

A•g.S•ckVoI. Flow Ra• 

ACFM 

21,733.72 21,477.19 21,966.82 21,725.91 

DSCFM 

•,vg. Stack Temp. 

'Stack Gas Velocity 

Avg. Velocity Head 

Avg. Sq. Rt of Delta P 

%lsokinetics; 

•,llowable isokinetic 90-110% 

•/o Moisture of Stack Gas 

Sample Volume 

236.100 238.526 240.300 238.309 

51.585 51.604 52.833 52.007 

0.6346 0.6299 

0.7966 0.7937 

0.6590 0.6412 

0.8118 0.8007 

ISOKINETIC TESTING SUMMARY 

96.82 98.22 95.77 96.94 

4.62% 5.46% 

44.721 44.830 

5.31% 5.13% 

44.707 44.753 
COMPANY NAME: General Shale Brick 

LOCATION: Mooresville, IN 

SOURCE TESTED: Kiln 32 

DATE OF TEST: 01t24/07 

RUN NO.: 

HCL/HF/SO2/NOX 

Molecular Weiht of Stack Gas. Dry Bssiz, Md 

%CO2 

%O2 2O 

Md 28.98 

Volume of Water Vapor Coflec•d • 8TO. CONO., Vwv 

V]¢ 40.1 

Vw(std) 2.108 

Volume of Dry GSS Gallanted @ 8"rD, COND., Vm(•d) TIn(F) 68.400 

Vm 46.890 

Pb(inchas Hg) 30.100 

dMta H 1.905 

gamma 0 941 

Vm(std) 44.721 

Molntum Content of Stack Gas, Bwo 

Bwo 4.62% 

l-Bwo 95.38% 

Molecular Weight of Steak Gas, Ms 

Ms 28.45 

• of •teck (enter diamnter in Inche•), • 

Depth•n 0 

W'•tholn 0 

diameter 42 

No. Of 8tacks 

As(L'W) 0 

As(alia.) 9.621119375 

Stalk; (0.300) 

Cp 0,84 

qr(delta p) 0.797 

Ts 236.100 

Vs 51.585 

Steak Gas Flowr•e, 

As 9.621119375 

Qa 29779 

8taOk Gas Flora • 8TD. COND., D W m,,m, Cl•d. 

Qstd (dscf/m) 21733.72 

Q'•td (dScf/hr) 1304022.92 

Vetedty at the Nozz•, Vn 

Oia, of Nozzte 0.25 

T'm)e of Run 60 

Vn 49.95 

% IloklnMJo, %1 

%1 96.82 

% teoklr•io m•ssumd from intlmtmdlate vatues 

%1 97.19 

Pollutant Mass Emission Rite, PMR, Ib•Jhr. 

Mn (g) 0.000897 0.0053 

0.3402 

0=0000 

HF 

PMR (Ib/hr) 0.0577 

PMR (ro/MMBtu) 0,0100 

HC1, 

G•in= per aof 

gr/acf 0.0002 

Groins per dsM 

gr/dscf 0.0003 

Grains p•r mg/dscf 

m•dscf 0,2470 

802 ppm 79.6• 

802 •bS/hr 17.28495418 

Nox ppm 51,67 

Nox Ibs/hr 8.04503638 

An(nozzle): 0.000341 

0.006189 

0.3979 

0.0100 

Total 

0.2470 

FIELD DATA 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

0 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

2O 

21 

22 

23 

24 

0656 

0.671 

0700 

0.670 

0.670 

0670 

01620 

0.600 

0.600 

0.620• 

0.61i 

0.620 

0.620 

0.650 

0.7,00 

0.600 

6.600 

0.600 

0.•30 

0.806 

0,81• 

0.837 

0.31E 

0.81• 

0.819 

O.78: 

0.775 

O.775 

O,775 

0.787 

0.781 

0.787 

,0.787i 

0.CO 

0.83' 

0.771 

O.794 

12:4• 

1.8•) 231 6C 

2,011 

2.100 

2.0t0 

2,010 

2.01( 

1.1•0 

1.100 

1.1•0 

1.1SO 

1.8.10 

1:1•0 

1.10( 

il00 

1.8•0 

86•.69o 

538.800j 

62 

234 631 60 235! 69 6• 

•35 72 6• 

235 72 6i 

236 75 61 

237 77 6• 

237 75 63 

237 77 65 

238 78 • 

236 72 65 

235 71 66 

235 72J 6• 

235i 75 66 

235 77 66 

235 78 66 

239 68 66 

239 74 66 

239 77 66 

239 78 66 

0.833 
COMPANY NAME: 

LOCATION: 

SOURCE TESTED: 

DATE OF TEST: 

RUN NO.: 

POLLUTANT: 

Molecular Weight of Stack Gas, Dry Basis, Md 

%CO2 

%02 

Volume of Water Vapor Collected • STD, COND., Vwv 

Vw(std) 2.587 

Volume of Dry Gas Collected @ 8TD. COND., Vm(std) Tm(F) 69.711 

Vm 47.123 

Pb(inches Hg) -(, •,.•. 

delta H 1.893 

Vm(std) 44.830 

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, Bwo 

Bwo 5.46% 

1-Bwo 94.54% 

Molecular Weight of Stack Gas, MS 

Ms 28.32 

Area of Stack (enter diameter in inches), As 

DepCPin 

No. of Stacks 

AS(L'IN) 0 

As(die.) 9.621119375 

Static Pressure, Ps 

PS 30.08 

Stack Gas Velocity, Ve, fps 

Cp 0 

sqr(delta p) 0.794 

Ts 238,526 

Vs 51,604 

Stack Gas Flowrate, Qe, acfm 

As 9.621119375 

Qs 29789 

StackGae Flowrate•STD. COND., DryBasis, Qetd. 

Q•d. 21477.19 

Qstd (dscf•r) 1288631.23 

Velocity at the Nozzle, Vn 

Din. of Nozzle 

Time of Run 

Vn 50.69 

% Isokinetic, %1 

%1 98,22 

% •okineticmeaeured from intermediate values 

%1 98.60 

Pollutant Mass Emission Rate, PMR, Ib•./hr. 

Mn(g) 

PMR (l•/hr) 0.0673 

PMR (tb/MMBtu) 0.0056 

Grains per acf 

g/acf 0.0003 

Grains per decf 

gr/dscf 0.0004 

Grains per mgldscf 

mg/dscf 0.2932 

SO2 ppm 60.2 

SO2 Ibsfr• 12.87754965 

Nox ppm 55.84 

No× bs•" 8.591685874 

0.4900 

0.0000 

An(nozzle) 0.000341 

0.008794 

0.5573 

0.0056 

0.2932 

FIELD DATA 

2 

3 

4 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

Delta P 

5c,0 

IK- Factor 

Square Delta P 

0.849; 

0.806 

0.806 

0.812 

0.812 

0.806 

0.837 

0,837 

0.849 

0.781 

0,775• 

0.775 

0.714 

0.775 

0.77! 

0.768 

0.768 

0.768 

0.781 

0.781 

]Sla• Ttme 

•ool [•op Time 

Volume DeltsH2 StaekTemp .D•M 

2.160 

1.950 •,,- 

1,gfi 

1.980 

1.980 :•: 

1.950 

2.100 

2.100 24( 

2.160 

1.830 

1.800 

1.800 

1.530 

1.809 

1.800 2• 

1,770 :"=, 

1.770 

1.770 

1.830 ,• •,4 

1.830 J3'i 84 

0.631] 0.794 47.123 1.8•3 238.526 69.711 
COMPANY NAME: % B,m• 

LOCATION: I.; 

SOURCE TESTED: •,,:, 

DATE OF TEST: 

RUN NO.: 

POLLUTANT: 

Molecular Weight of Stack Gas, Dry Basis, Md 

%CO2 

%02 

Md 28.92 

Volume of Water Vapor Collected • STD. COND.. VWV 

VIc 

Vw(std) 2.507 

Volume of Dry Gas Collected (• STD. COND., Vm(etd) 

Tm(F) 76.275 

Vm 47.566 

Pb(inches Hg) •:;, 1L,3 

delta H 1.979 

Vm(std) 44.707 

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, Bwo 

Bwo 5.31% 

1-Bwo 94.69% 

Molecular Weight of Stack Gas, Ms 

Ms 28.34 

Area of Stack (enter diameter In Inches), As 

Depth-in 

Width-in o 

diameter 

No. of Stacks 

A=(L'VV) 0 

As(dis.) 9.621119375 

Static Pressure, Ps 

Static 

Ps 30.98 

Stack Gas Velocity, Va, fps 

Cp •; 

sqr(delta p) 0.812 

Ts 240.300 

Vs 52,833 

Stack Gas Flowrate, Qs, acfm 

AS 9.621119375 

Qs 30499 

Stack Gas Flowrate (• STD. COND., Dry Basis, Qstd. 

Qstd. 21966.82 

Qstd (dscf/hr) 1318009.33 

Velocity at the Nozzle, Vn 

Dis. of Nozzle 0 

Time of Run 6•., 

Vn 50.60 

% laoklnetlc, %1 

%1 95.77 

% I•oklnetlc measured from Intermediate values 

%1 96.13 

Pollutant Mass Emission Rate, PMR, IbsJhr. 

Mn (g) o: •;,724 0.009208 

PMR (Ib/hr) 0.0640 0.5345 0.59846 

PMR (IbtMMBtu) 0.00522 0.0000 0.00522 

Grains per acf 

gr/acf 0.0003 

Grains per dscf 

gr/dscf 0.0003 

Grains per mg/dscf 

mg/dscf 0.271346011 0.271346 

SO2 ppm 66,69 

SO2 Ibs/hr 14.59107504 

Nox ppm 53.14 

Nox Ibs/hr 6.362658507 

An(nozzle) 0.000341 

FIELD DATA 

2 

3 

4 

6 

7 

6 

9 

10 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

Delta p 

700 

0.660 

Square Delta P 

0.837 

0.837 

0.825, 

0.825 

0.806 

0.79, 

0.794 

0.849 

0.849 

0.79z 

0.781 

0.79• 

0.794 

0.806 

0.806 

0.794 

0.837 

0.837 

0.806 

0.775 

K-Facet 309] 

Volume Delta H2 •tack 

ZI00 

2.100 

2.040 

1.950 

1.890 

1.8901 

2.160 

2.160 

1.890 

1.83( 

1,690 

1.890 

1.950 

1.950 

1.990 

2.100 

2,100 

950 

1.8001 

0.8121 47,566 1.979 240.3•0• 76.275 
EMISSION SUMMARY 

SOURCE TESTED: Plant 32 

COMPANY NAME: General Shale 

DATE OF TEST: 1.24.07 

PM/PM 10 

• 

Particulate Emissions • 

i o.•q 

Condensibl.e• t 2.1• •• •onsensibl• 2.4704 

Run2 •. Run3 • 

0.0016• 0.0017 • 

0.3212 0.3505 • 

0.2942 0.0331 •_._.•.8274 0.6154 0.3836 •---•. 15--•-•--- 

•ck Vol. Flow Rate 

ACFM 33,628.53 

DSCFM 24,370.68 [ 23,740.73 23,792.84 123,968.08 

Stack Gas Velocity 

237.600 

58.255 • 240-200 t 241.400 t 239.733 

56.889 57.063 57.402 

•Head 

•t 

0.7688 0.7800 

of Deffa P 

0.8061 

0.8978 

0.7652 

0.8747 ] 0.8768 0.8831 

ISOKINETIC TESTING SUMMARY 

%lsokinetics: 

AIIowabl.__.•e isokinetic 90-110% 

% Moisture of Stack Gas 

Sam•lume 

96.65 

5.09% 

97.67 97.07 

4.97% 

4-•• • 489% 4.99% 

50.056 49.443 
COMPANY NAME: Gene•a] Shale 

LOCATION: M•oresville, IN 

•OURCE TESTED: Plan! 32 

DATE OF TEST: 1.2407 

RUN NO.: 

PM,•M 10 

Molecular Weight of Slack Gas, Dry Basis, Md 

%C02 

%02 20 

Md 28.96 

Volume of Water Vapor Collected • STD. COND., Vwv 

VW(St•) 2.686 

Volume of Dry Gas Collected • 8TD. COND., Vm(std) TIn{F) 68.375 

Vm 52.416 

Pt•inc•es Hg) 30 

delta H 2,420 

gar•ime 941 

Moisture Content of Slack Gee, Bwo 

Bwo 5.09% 

l-Bwo 94.9t% 

Molecular Weight of Slack Gee, Me 

Ms 28.40 

Area of •teck (enter dlame•r in inches), As 

Depth-In 0 

W•dltHn 

diameter 42 

No. of Stacks 

As(L'W) 0 

As(din 9.621119375 

Sletlc Pre•ure, Pa 

•af•C IO 300• 

PS 30.08 

Stack Gee Velocity, Ve, fpe 

C• 084 

sqr(de•a p) 

Ts 237.600 

Ms •8.255 

Slack Gas Flowrate, Qe, ecfm 

As 9.621119375 

Qs 33629 

Slack Gas FIowrete • 8TD. COND,, Dry Basis, Q•td. 

Qstd (dscf/m) 24370.68 

Qstd (dscfR]r) 1462240,94 

Velocity at the Nozzle, Vn 

Die. of Nozzle 0 25 

Time of Run 60 

Vn 56.30 

% I•okinetl¢, • 

%1 96,65 

Ar•L•le 0.000341 

% I•oklnetlc meaaured from Intermediate values 

%1 97.02 

Pollutant Mee•; Emlnlon Rate, PMR, Ib•/hr. 

Mn(g) 00049 0.0335 0.03836 PMR (Ib/hr) 0.3156 2,1549 2.4704 PMR (Ib•MMBtu) 0.0490 0.0000 0.0490 

•ilterabl¢ CondenMble Total 

Grains per ecf 

gt/acf 0,0011 

Grains per d•cf 

gr/dscf 0.0015 

Grains per mg/d•--f 

mg/dscf 1.2087 1,2087 

RELD DATA 

2 081( 

3 0 840 

4 0.840 

5 o,.8•o 

6 0880 

7 0 830 

8 0830 

9 780 

10 0 780 

11 0760 

12 0.74• 

13 0 77O 

14 057O 

15 0 770 

16 0 800 

17 0 800 

18 0 790 

19 0 800 

20 0.890 

21 

22 

23, 

24 

0.900 

0.917 

0.917i 

0.917 

0.938 

0.91 

0.911 

0.883 

0,883 

0.872 

0.860 

0.877 

0.877 

0.877 

0.894 

0.894 

0.889 

0.894 

0•94: 

115 768 

63.352 

236 

2.820 236 

Z§20 237! 

2.520 237 

2.640 237 

2.490 237 

2.490 239 

2.340 239 

2.•ll) 239 

•0 236 

236 

2.310 236 

2,310 236 

Z310 236 

237 

2.400 240 

2.370 241 

24£ 

2.670 24• 

64 6; 

6• 6• 

71 6• 

71 63 

74 63 

75 63 

75 64 

76 65 

77 65 

74 66 

71 66 

71 66 

72 67 

74 67 

75 66 

66, 66 

7• 6• 

74 66 

76 66• 
COMPANY NAME: General Shak, 

LOCATION: M oo!e•llie, IH 

8OURCE TESTED: Pianl 32 

DATE OFTEST: 2,i 0•' 

RUN NO.: 

•LLUTANT: P•NPM •0 

Enter Data 

lol•uter W•loht of •ck G• •q •i• ld 

Md 28.• 

•o1• of Wel•r V•r Coll• • •TO. •ONO., • 

• 54 

Volum • • G• •o11• • IT•. •O•., V•ld) T•e) 67.• 

Vm 51.078 

• 0941 

Moi•um Com•nt of •ck G• • 

• 4.97% 

1-• •.•% 

iolculer Weight • •eck Gee, M• 

Ms 28.• 

Ar• of •¢k (enter di•er In Inch,), A• 

•in 

V•KI•I-ln 0 

(•amete• 42 

No. of Stacks 

As(L'W) 0 

As(dis.) 9.621119375 

•tatic Pre•ure, I• 

8ta§c (0.300• 

8tsck Gas Velocity, V=, fpe 

=•r(de•ta p) 0.875 

Ts 240.200 

Vs 56.889 

8tsck Gee Fiowrats, Q•, a¢fm 

AS 9.621119375 

QS 32840 

Stack GM Flowrats Q STD. COND., DW Bssls, Q•td. 

Qstd. 23740.73 

Qstd (dscf/hr) 1424443.52 

Velocity •t the Nozzl• Vn 

Dis. of Nozzle 0 25 

Time of Run 60 

Vr• 55.12 

%lockin•i•%l 

%1 96.89 

%l•oklnetlcme•sumdfromintermedlstevslue• 

%1 97.27 

Pollutant Mass Emission Rate, PMR, IbsJhr. 

Mn (g) 0.005 0 0046 0.00958 PMR (10fr•) 0.3212 0.2942 0.6184 

PMR (t•4MMBtu) 0.0243 0.0O00 0.0243 

J•llterable C•e,d•n•ible Total 

Grains per scf 

grk=cf 0.0012 

Grains per d•cf 

gr/dscf 0.0016 

Grains P•r mg/dscf 

rng/dscf 1.2566 1.2566 

An(nozzle) 0.000341 

FIELD DATA 

084! 

2 0 73( 

3 770 

4 0 770 

0.790 

6 0 799 

7 07.90 

8 0 790 

9 0.920 

10 0.84c 

12 0 730 

13 0 73t 

14 0 720 

15 0720 

16 0.720 

17 0.730 

18 0 740 

19 0 730 

20 0 730 

21 

22 

23 

24 

0.917 

0,854 

0.877 

0,877 

0.88£ 

0.88£ 

0.889 

0.889 

0.959 

0.917 

0.860 

0.854 

0.85• 

0.849 

0.849 

0.849 

0.854 

0.86C 

0.85 

0.854 

2.520 241 

2.190 24O 

Z3101 240 

2,310 242 

2.370 242 

2.370 242 

2.370 242 

2.37i 242 

2.7•0 243 

2.•20 240 

2.220 236 

•|•0 239 

2.1•0 239 

2.150 239 

2.160 239 

2.1•i 239 

•t• 239 

240 

2.1• 240 

•1• 240 

170 036 

11&958 

lSt•'rlme 43 

I.::1)4111 L: •:::::DIIIi :C 

57 6r! 

60 60 

63 59 

66 59 

68 60 

69 60 

71 62 

72 61 

73 61 

69 62 

74 63 

75 63 

78 64 

76 64 

79 65 

80 66 

80 66 

81 66 

81 66 

0.7661 0.•751 51 0781 2.2981 240.2001 67.050 
COMPANY NAME: Geqeral Sh3• 

LOCATION: M:,ores.;•te 

SOURCE TESTED: Plant 32 

DATE OF TEST: 24 0: 

RUN NO.: 

POLLUTANT: PM•F'M10 

Enter Data 

MOIOCu sr WelgM of S•k Oss, D• •sl•, •d 

%CO2 

%02 19 

Md 28.92 

V•um• • W•r V•r •11• I •. OOND., 

VIe 54 

Vw(s• 2.•0 

Volumt of D• Oa• •11• • STD. •D., V•) 

Tm(• 73.• 

Vm 52.242 

Pb0nch• Hg) 30 1• 

de• H 2.• 

g•m•a 0.941 

Vm(s• 

• 4.• 

1-• •.11• 

•ol•ul•r W•llhl • •ck Oss, • 

Ms 

A• • •ck lair •iammr tn inch.), As 

Depth-in 0 

Wide-in 

diameter 42 

No. of Stacks 

•s(L*W) 0 

As(dia.) 9.82111938 

Static Pressure, Ps 

Static (0.300• 

Ps 30.08 

Stack Gas Velocity, Vs, fps 

Cp 0 84 

sqr(delta p) 0.877 

Ts 241.4G0 

Vs 57,063 

•tack Gas Flowrate, Qs, acfm 

As 9.62111938 

Qs 32940 

Stack Gas Flowreta @ STD. COND., Dly Basis, Qatd. 

Qstd. 23792.84 

Q•M (dscf/•r) 1427570.55 

Velocity at the Nozzle, Vn 

Dia. of Nozzle 0 25 

Time of Run 

Vn 55.73 

% laokinettc, %1 

%1 97.67 

% laokinetlc measured from intermediate values 

%1 98.04 

Pollutant Mass Emission Rate, PMR, Ib•J'nr. 

Mn (g) 0 0055 0 00052 0.00602 

PMR (Ib/hr) 0.3505 0,0331 0.38364 

PMR (Ib/MMBtu) 0.02641 00000 0.02641 

Fi#erab/e Condensit Total 

Grains per acf 

grlacf 0.0013 

Grains per dscf 

grldscf 0.0017 

Grains per mg/dscf 

mgldscf 1.36431182 1.364812 

An(nozzle) 0.000341 

FIELD DATA 

Run 3 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

0 

o 800 

0 8O0 

0 800 

0 80O 

0 600 

0.920 

0 800 

0 760 

0 730i 

0 73C 

0 730 

0730 

0.730 

0 730 

0 730 

0 730 

0 730 

0 730 

IK- Factor 3.00 

I•lUarl Bllta Pi voh•m 

0.90(] 2.430 243 

0.89, •.400 24• 

0.894 2.4• 243 

0.894 2• 244 

0.894 2.400 245 

O.894 2.• 245 

0,894 2.4• 245 

0.959 2,760 244 

0. 894 2.4• 

0.872 Z•0 24 

0.854 2.t• 

0.8• 2.t• 239 

0.85• 2.•i 239; 

0.8• 2.t• 239 

0.854 2.t• 240 

0.8• 2,t• 24O 

0.854 2.t• 2•0 

0.8• 2.t• 240 

0,8• 2.1• 

2•8.392 

176 150 

op Time 17 38 

69 66 

72 67 

74 66 

75 6•.• 

76 6£ 

77 67 

76 67 

79 68 

79 68 

79 68 

75 68 

80 69 

81 69 

82 69 

83 69 

84 70 

8,3 70 

84 71 

84 71 

84 72 

7701 0.8771 52.242l 2.3091 241.4001 73.625 
Analysis, Inc. General Shale Brick, Inc. 

Project Number: 447 

APPENDIX IH 

FIELD DATA 
VELOCITY TRAVERSE POINT DETERMINATION 

(EPA Method 1) 

General Shale Brick 

Circular Stack 

Taver•e Points on Diameter: 

Stack Dia.(inches)? 

Points: 

Mooresville, IN 

41 51 51 lOl 121 42 

5 

7 

8 

9 

10 

1t 

t2 

2.81 1. 1.85 '1.34 •.09 0.88 

10.50 6.13 3.44 2.81 

31.50 

39.19 

12.43 

29.57 

35.87 

4.41 

8.15 

13.57 

26.43 

37.59 

6.13 

9.49 

14.36 

27.64 

32.51 

3•.8• 

4•96 

7.43 

10.•0 

14.95 

38.56 34.57 

27.05 

31.•0 

37.04 

39.15 

41.12 



4O 

Table 7E-1 Analyzer (or System) Calibration Error Data 

Source 

T•st personnel: 

Date:. 

Time: 

Low-level (or zero) calibration l•as 

Mid-level calibration •as 

High-level calibration sas 

Manufacturer 

Certified Cylinder 

Value (indicat• 

units) 

Analyzer or SyM•tn calibration on, or data for 

sampling runs: 

Analyzer Model 

S•ial No. 

R©f•'r• to data from the analy2•r calibration •rror t•st of• non-dilution •yst•m. • R•fots to data from a 3-point •ystem •libmtion ,rror t©st of a dilution system. 

3 

Calibration Span •CS, ): 

Analyzer 

calibration 

(indicate 

units) 

.7....°.:.• .• 

kZ.o.. 3.•.• 

Absolute 

diffca•nc• 

(indicate units) 

Calibration Error 

(percent of 

calibration span) 

A-•B x 100 

CS 

0 



?xAir Analysis, Inc. 

3904 Clarks Creek Road • Plainfield. Indiana 46168 

Tel. 317 837-8514 Fax. 317 837-8518 

Certification Page 

Air Analysis, Inc. represents that the information provided in this report is true and accurate. We at Air Analysis, Inc. strive to remain true to our mission, that lhe people involved are people of integrity, the data acemate, and the reporting timely. 

Sincerely, 

Michael M. Dieen, President 

Air Analysis, Inc. 

STACK TESTING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (Page 2) 

Test Summary, Table 1 

Visible Emissions, Table 1 

RESULTS (Page 3) 

Particulate Matter (PM) Emissions, Table 2 & 3 

Particulate Matter < 10 micron (PM10) Emissions, Table 2 & 3 

Hydrogen Chloride (HC1) Emissions, Table 2 & 3 

Hydrogen Flouride (HF) Emissions, Table 2 & 3 

Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Emissions, Table 2 & 3 

Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Emissions, Table 2 & 3 

3. DESCRIPTION OF PROCESSES AND FIELD NOTES (Page 4) 

4. METHODOLOGY (Page 5) 

Summary of Sampling Procedures 

Description of Sampling Methods 

APPENDIX 

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS 

FIELD DATA PRINTOUTS 

FIELD DATA 

LABORATORY DATA 

CHAIN OF CUSTODY 

CALIBRATION DATA 

VISIBLE EMISSIONS DATA 

SUBMITTED PROTOCOL 

PRODUCTION DATA 

I 

II 

HI 

IV 

V 

VI 

VH 

VIII 

IX 
.i ' Air Analysis Inc. General Shale Brick, Inc. 

Project Number: 447 

,,EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

Air Analysis, Inc. was contracted by General Shale Brick to perform air emissions 

sampling of Kiln #32 during brick manufacturing production in Mooresville, Indiana, on 

January 24, 2007. The objective of the test program was to determine compliance with 

Indiana air permit requirements and MACT standards. Sampling was performed for 

Particulate Matter (PM), Particulate Matter < 10 microns (PM10), Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Hydrogen Chloride (HC1) and Hydrogen Flouride fflF) emissions. 

Visible emissions also coincided during particulate sampling. The following personnel 

were involved with the testing program: 

Air Analysis 

Air Analysis 

Air Analysis 

Air Analysis 

IDEM 

General Shale 

Michael Dicen 

Susan Thorsell 

Marcus Allen 

Ron Stapert 

Jarod Fisher 

Warren Paschal 

The testing program was performed utilizing US EPA Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 9, 26A, and 

202. Three sets of one hour test runs were performed on Kiln 32 on January 24, 2007. 

TEST SUMMARY 

Table 1 

Source 

Kihl 32 

Time 

9:11- 

13:a6 

Mass 

Emissions 

(PM/PMI0) 

(PM/PMI0) 

1.156 lbs/hr 

Sul.tbtes 

corrected 

Mass 

Emissions 

(PM) 

(PM) 

0.•291 

lbs/hr 

Hydrogen 

Chloride 

(lbs/hr) 

(HCI) 

0.06 

lbs/hr 

Hydrogen 

Flouride 

(lbs/hr) 

(HF) 

0.45 

lbs/hr 

Sulfur 

Dioxide 

(lbs/hr) 

(SO2) 

14.9 

lbs/luNitrogen 

Oxides 

(lbs/hr) 

(NOx) 

8.3 

lbs/hr 

0 % Opaci O, was read during all runs on Kiln #32 
Analysis, Inc. General Shale Brick, Inc. 

Project Number: 447 

RESULTS 

TEST CONDITIONS 

TABLE 2 

KJLN 32 

HCL/HF/SO2/NOx 

Gas Conditions 1 

T•' 'Stack Temperature 235.1 

BWO 4.6 

02 

CO2 

Volumetric Flow Rate 

Qa 

Moisture (vohm, e %) 

OxTgen (d•y volume %) 

Dioxide (dry volume %) 

Actual eonOitions {acfm) 

2O 

2 3 

238.5 240 

5.5 5.3 

19 19 

1 1 

29, 778 29. 789 30. 498 

Avg 

247,3 

5.1 

19 

•o. 022 

Qstd Stm•da•d Conditions (dscfm) 21.733 21.725 

Pollutant Results 

E(me) Emissio•'• Rate. (lbs/hr) HC] 0.0577 

0.34 

17.3 

8 

21,477 21.966 

'0,0673 0.064 

0.49 0,53 

12.9 14.6 

8,6 8.4 

Emission Rate. (lbs/hr) HF 

Enfission Rate, (lbs/hr) SO2 

Emission Rate. (lbs/hr) NOx 

0.063 

0.45 

14.9 

8.3 

KILN 32 

PM/PM10 

Gas Conditions 

T$ 

1 

Stack TempeFaturd 237.61 g'41.4 '239.7 

Bwo Moisture (volume %} 5.1 5.0 4.9 5.0 

02 Oxygen {dry volmne %• 20 19 19 19 

Carbon Dioxide (du volume %) 1 1 1 1 

Actaml C0n'ditions (acfm) 33.628 •2.840' 33'.136 

C02 

Volumetri• Flow Rate 

Qstd Standard Condiiions (dscfm) 2.•.968"( 

Pollutant Results 

Ec Emission'Rate. (gr/dscf) PM 

24.371 2'3.74'1 

o.ooi5 0.o015 

0.3156 0.3212 

2.15 0.61 

E(me) 

o.6o1• 

0.3505 

0.38 

Enfission Rate. (lbs/hr) PM 

PM/PMI0. (lbs/hr) 

0.0016 

0.3291 

1.156 

3. 
\Air Analysis, Inc. General Shale Brick, Inc. 

Pro.jecl Numbel: 447 

METHODOLOGY 

The sampling procedures used by Air Analysis, Inc. are as follows: 

Title 40 

Method 

Method 

CFR Part 60 Appendix A 

1 "Sampling of Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources" 

2 "Determining of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate" 

Method 3 "Gas Analysis for the Determination of Molecular Weight" Method 4 "Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gas" 

Method 5 "Determining of Particulate Emissions" 

Method 6C "Determination of Sulfur Dioxide" 

Method 7E "Determination of Nitrogen Oxides" 

Method 9 "Visual Determination of the Opacity Emissions" 

Method 202 "Determination of Condensible Emissions from Stationary Sources" 

SAMPLE POINT DETERMINATION-EPA METHOD 1 

Sampling point locations were determined according to EPA Reference Method 1. 

Sampling Points 

Locations Dimensions Ports Points Per Port Total Points Kiln 32 42" I.D. 2 10 20 

* * Exaat measure points and distances to disturbances are listed in Appendix- Field Data 

VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE EPA METHOD 2 

EPA Method 2 was used to determine the gas velocity and flow rate at the stack. Figure 4-2 includes the components of the EPA Method 2 sampling apparatus. Each set of velocity determinations included the measurement of gas velocity pressure and gas temperature at each of the Method 1 determined traverse points. The velocity pressures were measures with a Type S 

pitot tube. Gas temperature measurements made with a Type K thermocouple and digital pyrometer. 

GAS COMPOSITION AND MOLECULAR WEIGHT EPA METHOD 3 

In order to determine the oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations, a sample of gas was 

obtained and analyzed in accordance with EPA Method 3. The gas sample was collected using a 

Fyrite analyzer. The results were used to determine gas molecular weight. 

MOISTURE CONTENT- EPA METHOD 4 

The flue gas moisture content at the testing locations was determined in accordance with EPA 

Method 4. Figure 4-2 includes the Method 4 sampling components. The gas moisture was 

determined by quantitatively condensing moisture in the chilled impingers and silica absorption. The amount of moisture condensed was determined gravimetrieally. A dry gas meter was used to 

measure the volume of gas sampled. Moisture content is used to determine stack gas velocity. 
Analysis, Inc. General Shale B•°ick, Inc. 

P•o.ject Numbe•: 447 

PARTICULATE DETERMINATION EPA METHOD 5/202 

Stack gas is withdrawn isokinetically and particulate matter is collected on the nozzle, probe and 

filter. The probe temperature and filter are maintained at temperatures of 248 degrees F (+/- 25 

deg. F). The impinger temperature and exit gas is maintained at temperatures at or below 68 

degrees F. The nozzle, probe and glass filter containers are rinsed with acetone and the rinse is 

captured in a sealed glass container. 

(Method 202 only)The impingers and connecting glassware are rinsed twice with de-ionized 

water and captured in a sealed container. Two rinses of methylene chloride are captured and 

stored in a sealed glass container 

SO2 DETERMINATION EPA METHOD 6C 

Stack gas is withdrawn from the stack and conditioned (moisture is removed) before being analyzed by infrared detection. Sulfur Dioxide molecules are "excited" by specific wave lengths. Molecular excitement is directly proportional to the concentration of SO2. Quality assurance of 

the analyzer is first determined by direct injection of known EPA protocol 1 gas concentrations. 

A system check of the probe, connection lines and conditioner is also determined prior to and 

after each sample period to determine drift bias. 

NOx DETERMINATION EPA METHOD 7E 

Stack gas is withdrawn from the stack and conditioned (moisture is removed) before being analyzed by chemilumineseent detection. NOx molecules are "excited" by specific wave lengths. Molecular excitement is directly proportional to the concentration of NOx. Quality assurance of 

the analyzer is first determined by direct injection of known EPA protocol 1 gas concentrations. A system check of the probe, connection lines and conditioner is also determined prior to and 

after each sample period to determine drift bias. 

OPACITY EPA METHOD 9 

Stack opacity readings are taken for 60 minutes at 15 second intervals for NSPS and 30 minutes at 

15 intervals for state permitted, non-federal sources, by a certified visible emissions reader. The 

visible emissions reading are conducted during each of the particulate test runs. The results are 

reported as an average opacity reading for the half an hour period. A copy of the visible reader's 

current certification is included in the Appendix. 

HYDROGEN HALIDE DETERMINATION EPA METHOD 26A 

Stack gas is withdrawn isokinetically and halides are collected on the nozzle, probe and filter, sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide. The probe temperature and filter are maintained at 

temperatures of 248 degrees F. HCL is collected in 0.1 N H2S04. Chlorine is collected in 0.1 N 

NaOH. The impinger temperature and exit gas is maintained at temperatures at or below 68 

degrees F. 

The impingers and connecting glassware are rinsed twice with de-ionized water and captured in a 

sealed container. 
A_A• •alysis, Inc. General Shale Brick, Inc. 

Project Number: 447 

APPENDIX I 

SA]tlPL E CALCULATIONS 
F'•jure 5-I. Metals & PartJculate Sampling Train 
A Air Analys•s, Inc. 

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS 

The table• pre•ntin 8 the re•ulta a•e generated ©lectronkally •om raw data. It may not be ixmible to exa•y duplicate these t'e•lt• using • •alculater. 

The reference method dab r•ult• and all calculations are carried to sL•een decimal pla•e• thmushout. The •nal table is formatted to an appropriate 

number of signlficant figures. 

1. Volume of water collected (wscO 

V,,.,•= (0.04707X V•) 

•ere: 

Vk 

V• 

0.04707 

total volume of liquid collected in impingers and silica gel (ml) 

volume of water collected at standard conditions (fP) 

conversion factor (R3/ml) 

2. Volume of gas metered, standard conditions (dsc0 

(I 7.64X V,•)(P•.,,+ --•-• X•'•) 13.6 •,•- 

(460*/'.) 

Where: 

17.64 

13.6 

460 

barometric pressure (in Hg) 

average dry gas meter temperature (°F) 

volume of gas sample through dry gas meter at meter conditions (It 3) 

volume of gas sample through dry gas meter at standard conditions (if3) 

gas meter correction factor (dimensionless) 

average pressure drop across meter box orifice (in HzO) 

conversion factor (°R/in Hg) 

conversion factor (in H20/in Hg) 

°F to °R conversion constant 

Sample gas pressure (in Hg) 

v,=e•,o+(-i- •) 

'Where: 

Pbaro 

P• 

P, 

13.6 

barometric pressure (in Hg) 

sample gas static pressure (in H20) 

absolute sample gas pressure (in H•O) 

conversion factor (in H20/in Hg) 
A Air Analysis, Inc. 

Actual vapor pressure (in Hg) 

ev vapor pressure, actual (in Hg) 

absolute sample gas pressure (in Hg) 

Moisture Content (%) 

V.,,• 

proportion of water vapor in the gas stream by volume 

volume of gas sample through the dry gas meter at standard conditions (fP) 

volume of water collected at standard conditions (fl•) 

6. Saturated moisture content (%) 

Where: 

proportion of water vapor in gas stream by volume at saturated conditions (%) 

vapor pressure, actual (in Hg) 

absolute sample gas pressure (in Hg) 

7. Molecular weight of dry gas stream (lb/lb-mole) 

Md=M¢o" (C02) +Aim (02) +M.. ° v, 

(CO+N2) 

(I00) -(I00) (I00) 

Where: 

Md 

O2 

CO + N, 

100 

dry molecular weight of sample gas (lb/lb-mole) 

molecular weight of carbon dioxide (IWlb-mole) 

molecular weight of oxygen (IWlb-mole) 

molecular weight of carbon monoxide and nitrogen (lb/lb-mole) 

proportion of carbon dioxide in the gas stream by volume (%) 

proportion of oxygen in the gas stream by volume (%) 

proportion of carbon monoxide and nitrogen in gas stream by volume (%) 

conversion factor, % 
A Air Analysis, Inc. 

8. Molecular weight of sample gas (lb/lb-mole) 

Md 

B. 

dry molecular weight of sample gas (lb/lb-mole) 

proportion of water vapor in the gas stream by volume 

molecular weight of water (lb/lb-mole) 

molecular weight of sample gas, wet basis (lb/lb-mole) 

9. Velocity of sample gas (IVsec) 

Cp 

Ms 

Ps 

t, 

Vs 

460 

velocity pressure coefficient (dimensionless) 

pitot tube constant 

molecular weight of sample gas, wet basis (lb/Ib-mole) 

absolute sample gas pressure (in. Hg) 

average sample gas temperature (°F) 

average sample gas velocity (R/sec) 

°F to °R conversion factor 

10. Total flow of sample gas (acfi'n) 

Where: 

As 

Vs 

60 

cross section area of sampling location (t• •) 

volumetric flow rate at actual conditions (acfin) 

sample gas velocity (fdsec) 

conversion factor, seconds to minutes 
A • Analysis, Inc. 

1. Total flow ofsample gas (dscfm) 

(t•','460) 

Bwo 

Ps 

Qa 

Qstd 

17.64 

460 

proportion of water vapor in the gas stream by volume 

absolute sample gas pressure (in. Hg) 

volumetric flow rate at actual conditions (acfm) 

volumetric flow rate at standard conditions (dscfm) 

average sample gas temperature (°F) 

conversion factor, ((°R/in.Hg) 

°F to °R conversion factor 

12. Total flow of sample gas (dscth) 

(Q=XP, X 17.64X -B.o)](60) [ (t.,*460) 

Wliere: 

Bwo 

Ps 

Qa 

Qstd/hr 

t, 

17.64 

460 

proportion of water vapor in the gas stream by volume 

absolute sample gas pressure (in. Hg) 

volumetric flow rate at actual conditions (acfm) 

volumetric flow rate at standard conditions (dscfmx60) 

average sample gas temperature (°F) 

conversion factor, ((°R/in.Hg) 

°F to °R conversion factor 
A Air Analysis, Inc. 

13. Percent Isokinetic (%) 

I•.. (°'°945°X T*X I'•) 

(•',X•',X•XOX• -BO 

Where: 

Bwo 

I 

Ps 

V• 

Vs 

0 

0.09450 

diameter of nozzle, inches 

proportion of water vapor int he gas stream by volume 

percent of isokinetic sampling (%) 

absolute sample gas pressure (in. Hg) 

average sample gas temperature (°R) 

volume of gas sample through the dry gas meter at standard conditions (fP) 

average sample gas velocity (fl/sec) 

total sample time, minutes 

constant 

14. Pollutant concentration (gr/dscf) 

(15.43Xm•) C,•- 

Where: 

C•d•f 

Vm•td 

15.43 

measured concentration in gas stream, grldscf 

pollutant collected, corrected for reagent blank, grams 

volume of gas sample through the dry gas meter at standard conditions 

conversion factor, grams to grains 

15. Pollutant Emissions, Mass Emissions Rate lbs/hr 

E e•/•," 

(l•guctX 2.2046e -9 X Q,,aX 60 

Where: 

E •r 

lag pollutant 

2.2046e-9 

60 

Mass emissions rate, pounds per hour 

micrograms of pollutant emissions 

volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dry basis (dscfm) 

Volume Standard conditions 

conversion factor, pounds per microgram 

conversion factor, minutes per hour 
A Air Analysis, Inc. 

16. Dioxin/Furan Emission Rate, lb/ton (Compliance Determination) 

.%,.. (c•,,,a(•2,,-,,,X•',), 

(P,,,,•) ii 

Vc'here: 

E 

K• 

P• 

Mass emissions rate, pounds per ton 

grain concentration of pollutant emissions 

volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dry basis (dsdh) 

conversion factor, 1 lb/7000 grains 

production rate tons per hour 

17. Dioxin/Furan Emission Rate, pg/Mg (Compliance Determination) 

E (£t•/mX0.4536X 10•) 

•'here: 

E I•ton 

0.4536 

109 

0.907 

Mass emissions rate, microgram per megagram 

Mass emissions rate, pounds per ton 

conversion factor, kilograms per pound 

conversion factor, micrograms per kilogram 

conversion factor, tons per megagram 
Pi•MVD TO LB/KR 

C LCUL T O S 

ppm NO, Ibs NO, 

-- OR .PPm NO• 8:3755 x I0' dscf .× 1.i94 × 10•'[ = !bs/NO, 

dscf 

Ibs NO• dscf 60rain IbsNO, 

dscf min hr 

2, SO: •)pm $0.• Ibs 

• 

6.01SI •" I0 • dscf 

OR ppm SOi x 1.660 x I0 "7 

= Ibs/$O%. 

dscf 

.IbsSO: dscf 60min IbsSO: 

dscf rnJn hr hr 

3. CO 

4. CH• 

ppm CO 

1.3762 x 107 

Ibs "CO 

dscf 

Ibs CO 

dscf 

dscf. 

•n. 

60min Ibs CO 

ppm CH.• Ibs CH• 

(1 Bws) 2.4017 x I0 • dscf 

Ibs C.H• dscf 60 mJn Ibs CH( 

X _=_V_ × 

dscf nun hr hr 

S, C•H, (1 Bws) 8.7573 × 10' dscf 

IbsC,H, dsc# 60rain Ibs 

,,X•X•• 

dscf rain hr hr 
o o. 

Or--. 

(ludd) enleA 
0 
(tudd) enleA 



•ir Analysis, Inc. General Shale Brick, Inc. 

Project Number: 447 

APPEND• • 

LABORA TOR Y DA TA 
JUN-O•-2005 21:34 From:PLANT 22 DISPATCH 9197747251 To:9197746634 P.1•1 
Air Analysis, Inc. 

3904 Clarks Creek Road 

Plainfield, IN 46168 

Analytical Report 

(0107-72) 

EPA Method 26 

Hydrogen fluoride 

Hydrogen chloride 

HPLC Analysis 

Sulfate 

Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. 

Phone: (919) 850 4392 / Fax: (919) 850 9012 / www, enthalpy.com 

2202 Ellis Road Durham, NC 27703 5518 
cortify that to tho b•st of my knowledgo all analytical data pros•nted in this report: 

* Havo boon chcckod for complotenoss 

• Are accurate, error-free, and legiblo 

• Have been conducted in accordance with approved protocol, and that all deviations and analytical p•oblems are summarized in the appropriate narrafivo(s) 

• This analytical report was prepared in Portable Document Format (.PDF) and contains 133 pages. 

QA Review Performed by: Ann L. H. Morris 

Page 2 of 133 
Summary of Results 

Page 3 of 133 
CompanyJAir Analysis, Inc. 

AnalystlKAM ParameterslEPA Method 26 

# Samples J3 runs & 1 blank 

Client #JN/A 

Job #•0107-72 

PO #JVerbal 

Report DateJl/30/2007 

Compound 

Hydrogen Fluoride 

Hydrogen Chloride 

Run 1 

5,292 

897 

Hydrogen Fluoride 

Hydrogen Chloride 

Blank 

12.9 ND 

33.6 J 

Sample ID / Catch Weight (ug) 

Run 2 

7,732 

1,062 

Run 3 

8,224 

984 

Page 4 of 133 

0107-72 m26 Results 2/1/2007 
CompanyJh,ir h,nal•sis, Inc, 

h,nalystlKEH ParameterslHPLC h,nalysis 

# Samplesl3 runs 

Client #iN/h, Job #J0107-72 

PO #JVerbal 

Report.Date 11/30/2007 

Compound 

Sulfate 

Sample ID / Catch Weight 

RID1 

3,094 

R2D1 

1,891 

R3D1 

2,149 

Page 5 of 133 

0107-72 Sulfate Results 1/30/2007 
Results 

Page 6 of 133 
o 

o 

•.wo. 2 
Narrative Summary 

Page 10 of 133 
Compan 

Analyst 

Parameters 

# Samples 

Custody 

Analysis 

Calibration 

Chromatographic 

Conditions 

Enthalpy Analytical Narrative Summary 

Air Anal.vsis. Inc. 

KAM 

EPA Method 26 

3 runs & 1 blank 

Client # N/A 

Job # 0107-72 

PO # Verbal 

Report Date January 31, 2007 

Erin Ortiz received the samples on 1/26/07 after being relinquished by Air Analysis, Inc. The samples were received in good condition at 

8.4 °C. A chain of custody was not received with the samples. 

Prior to and during analysis, the samples were kept under lock with 

access only to authorized personnel by Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. 

The samples were analyzed for hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride 

using the analytical procedures in EPA Method 26, Determination of 

Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions from Stationary Sources 

Non-Isokinetic Method (40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A). 

The samples were analyzed following the procedures in Section 11.0, Analytical Procedures. All samples and standards were prepared, stored, and analyzed using high-density polyethylene containers. 

The Agilent Model 1100 High Performance Liquid Chromatograph ("Gonzo") was equipped as follows: 

Front: DIONEX ED40 Electrochemical Detector 

Front: Dionex Ion Pac AS 14A, 4 x 250 mm (S/N 004604) 

Rear: NA 

Rear: Dionex Ion Pac AS 14A, 4 x 250 mm (S/N 003055) 

The calibration curves are located in the back of this report and 

referenced in the Analysis Method column on the Detailed Results page. 

For each calibration curve used, the first page of the curve contains all 

method specific parameters (i.e., curve type, origin, weight, etc.) used to 

quantify the samples. The calibration curve section also includes a table 

with the Retention Time (RetTime), Level (Lvl), Amount 

(corresponding units), Area, Response Factor (Amt/Area) and the 

analyte Name. The calibration table is used to identify (by retention 

time) and quantify each target compound. 

The acquisition method COLSWTCH.M is included in the Curve/QA Chromatograms section of this report. 

Page 11 of 133 
QC Notes 

Reporting Notes 

Enthalpy Analytical Narrative Summary 

(continued) 

As required in Section 7.2.2, Absorbing Solution Blanks, a 

client-provided reagent blank was analyzed. Additionally, a quality control check sample was analyzed at the same time as the blanks and 

samples. Unless otherwise specified, all method-required acceptance 

criteria were met. 

All sample preparation and analytical holding times specified in the 

method were met unless otherwise indicated. In Section 13.2, Sample Stability, the specified analytical holding time is four weeks. 

The instrument was set up using two columns of the same type to reduce 

the total time needed to run all the samples. Each sample was analyzed with two injections, one injection on each of the columns. Because the 

two injections were not on the same column, the retention times varied 

slightly more than our internal criteria of 3%. However, the response 

was similar on the two columns (as can be seen in the passing calibration curves), so the sample concentrations are accurate. 

The H2804 Inatrix samples were analyzed for F- and CI- but are reported 

as I-IF and HCI. The peaks listed in the "Sample Chromatograms" section are labeled hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride. The 

additional molecular weight contribution from the H+ is included in the 

results listed on each chromatogram and throughout the report. 

Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. is accredited to perform this method for 

compliance purposes by the Louisiana Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (LELAP), certificate number 04010. 

Page 12 of 133 
Enthalpy Analytical Narrative Summary 

Company Air Anal.vsis. Inc. Client # N/A 

Analyst KEH Job # 0107-72 

Parameters HPLC Analysis PO # Verbal 

# Samples 3 runs Report Date January 31, 2007 

Custody Erin Ortiz received the samples on 1/26/07 after being relinquished by Air Analysis, Inc. The samples were received in good condition at 

8.4 °C. A chain of custody was not received with the samples. 

Prior to and during analysis, the samples were kept under lock with 

access only to atrdaorized personnel by Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. 

Analysis The samples were analyzed for sulfate using general HPLC procedures. 

The Agilent Model 1100 High Performance Liquid Chromatograph ("Curly") was equipped as follows: 

Front: DIONEX ED40 Electrochemical Detector 

Front: Dionex Ion Pac AS14A, 4 x 250 mm (S/N 2243) 

Calibration The calibration curve is located in the back of this report and referenced 

in the Analysis Method column on the Detailed Results page. 

For each calibration curve used, the first page of the curve contains all 

method specific parameters (i.e., curve type, origin, weight, etc.) used to 

quantify the samples. The calibration curve section also includes a table 

with the Retention Time (RetTime), Level (Lvl), Amount 

(corresponding units), Area, Response Factor (Amt/Area) and the 

analyte Name. The calibration table is used to identify (by retention 

time) and quantify each target compound. 

Chromatographic The acquisition method 0107-45.M is included in the Curve/QA Conditions Chromatograms section of this report. 

QC Notes All sample preparation and analytical holding times specified in the 

method were met unless otherwise indicated. 

Reporting Notes None 

Page 13 of 133 
General Reporting Notes 

The following are general reporting notes that are applicable to all Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. reports, unless specifically noted otherwise. 

• The symbol MDL represents the Minimum Detection Limit Below this value the laboratory cannot confun the presence of the analyte of interest reliably. 

• The symbol LOQ represents the Limit of Quantification. Below this value the laboratory cannot quantitate the analyte of interest within the criteria of the method. 

• The symbol ND following a value indicates a non-detect or analytical result below the MDL. 

• The symbol J following a value indicates an analytical result between the MDL and the LOQ. A J flag indicates that the laboratory can positively identify the analyte of interest as present, but the value should be considered an estimate. 

• The symbol E following a value indicates an analytical result exceeding 100% of the highest calibration point. 

• The symbol DF represents a Dilution Factor. This number represents dilutions during the extraction and/or laboratory stages of sample treatment. The analytical result taken from a laboratory instrument is multiplied by the DF to get final results. 

• The Sample ID MS represents a Matrix Spike. An aliquot of an actual sample is spiked with a known 

amount of analyte so that a percent recovery value can be determined. This shows what effect the sample matrix may have on the target analyte, i.e. whether or not anything in the sample matrix prohibits analysis for the analyte(s). 

• The Sample ID MSD represents a Matrix Spike Duplicate. Prepared in the same manner as an MS, the 

use of duplicate matrix spikes allows further eonfh-mation of laboratory quality by showing the consistency of results gained by performing the same steps multiple times. Most methods performed by Enthalpy do not require analysis of an MSD. 

• The Sample ID B.c/represents a Blind Spike. A member of the Quality Assurance department has ere'ated BS samples for many of the analytes Enthalpy tests for, and only QA and the Enthalpy Analytical ownership have access to the actual values of these samples. The laboratory analyzes them without knowledge of the actual value, and the spreadsheets get completed for these samples solely by the QA 

• The Sample ID LCS represents a Laboratory Control Sample. Whenever spikes are prepared for clients our 

more spikes are prepared than needed. The extras (randomly chosen) are kept in-house at the appropriate temperature conditions. When the spike samples come back from the client for analysis, the LCSs (usually two are saved) are analyzed to confirm that the analyte could be recovered from the media, separate from the spike samples which were used on the project and which may have had issues caused during collection and/or transport. 

• Significant Figures: Where the reported value is much greater than unity (1.00) in the units expressed (specifically values of 1,000 or greater), the number is rounded to a whole number of units, rather than to 3 significant figures. For example, a value of 10,456.45 ug catch is rounded to 10,456 ug. There are five significant digits reported, but no confidence should be placed on more than three significant digits. 

Page 14 of 133 
Sample 

Chromatograms 

Page 17 of 133 
Data File H:\LC2007QI\GONZO\DATA\JAN\0107-72B\011-1001.D 

0107-72 

Sample Name: Run 

Injection Date 1/26/2007 5:47:32 PM Seq. Line I0 Sample Name Run i*i0 Location Vial ii Acq. Operator KAM Inj 1 Acq. Instrument Gonzo Inj Volume 25 •i Acq. Method H: \LC2007QI\GONZO\METHODS\COLSWTCH.M Last changed 1/26/2007 3:10:41 PM by KAM 

Analysis Method H:\LC2007QI\GONZO\METHODS\0107-72B.M Last changed 1/29/2007 9:08:29 AM by DJR 

ADO1 8, Dionex 1.D) 

u8 

440. 

1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 m____•i 

External Standard Report 

Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified 1/29/2007 9:08:11 AM Multiplier 1.0000 

Dilution 1.0000 

Use Multiplier & Dilution Factor with ISTDs 

Signal i: ADCI B, Dionex ED 40 

RetTime Type Axea Amt/Area Amount 

[min] [uS*s] [ug/mL] 

2.501 MM 201.00441 1.04602e-2 2.10254 

Totals 2.10254 

Grp Name 

Hydrogen Eluoride •snuallnte•ti0n(KAM)• 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

*** End of Report *** 

Page 18 of 133 

Instrument 3 1/29/2007 12:14:24 PM DJR Page 1 of 1 
 Air Analysis Inc. General Shale Brick, Inc. 

Project Number: 447 

Kiln 32 

Filter 

623 

624 

625 

PM DETERMINATION 

FILTER 

Run # Pre-Weight 

1 0.3701 

2 0.3665 

3 0.3704 

Post-Weig ht 

0.3722 

0.3695 

0.3734 

Net Gain 

0.0021 

0.0030 

0.0030 

Kiln 32 

Beaker ID 

Z 

1 

2 

Acetone Beaker (50mls) 

ACETONE 

Run # Pre-Weight 

1 80.1370 

2 55.1905 

3 53.6844 

56.1264 

Post-Weight 

80.1398 

55.1925 

53.6869 

56.1264 

Net Gain 

0.0028 

0.0020 

0.0025 

0.0000 

Kiln 32 

Run # 

1 

2 

3 

TOTAL 

Filter Net Gain 

0.0021 

0.003 

0.003 

Acetone Net Gain 

0.0028 

0.002 

0.0025 

Totals 

0.0049 

0.005 

0.0055 
Analysis, Inc. General Shale Brick, Inc. 

Project Number: 447 

CONDENSIBLE DETERMINATION 

n2__QO 

Kiln 32 

Beaker ID Run # 

FF 

Blank Beaker 

Pre-Weight Post-Weight Net Gain 

DD 1 80.7623 80.7932 0.0309 

EE 2 54.1080 54.1120 0.0040 

3 77.6275 77.6298 0.0023 

(500mls H20) 65.7854 65.7854 0.0000 

D[/SULFATE CALCULATIONS 

Kiln 32 

Beaker Run ID 

DD 1 

EE 2 

FF 3 

DI DI DI 

Total Net Gain Sulfate Net minus 

Net Gain Inhouse Lab Sulfate = 

Volume Volume Volume (grams) (glml) Grams 

0.0309 332 50 382 0.03555 0.00006188 0.03246 

0.0040 300 50 350 0.00467 0.00003782 0.00278 

0.0023 350 49 399 0.00262 0.00004298 0.00052 

DI net gain grams x (total mls/(total mls aliquot) sulfate grams corrected gain 
Analysis, Inc. General Shale Brick, Inc. 

Project Number: 447 

CONDENSIBLE DETERMINATION 

(Continued) 

Kiln 32 

Beaker ID 

BB 

CC 

Blank'Beaker 

MeCI2 

Run # 

3 

(50mls MeCI2) 

Pro-Weight 

56.0970 

56.0485 

77.3114 

Post-Weight 

56.0980 

56.0503 

77.3114 

Net Gain 

0.0010 

0.0018 

0.0000 

79.1611 79.161t 0.0000 

TOTAL 

Kiln 32 

Run # H20 Net Gain 

0.03246 

2 0.00278 

3 0.00052 

MeCI2 Net Gain 

0.001 

Totals 

0.03346 

0.0018 0.00458 

0 0.00052 

9 
,2kAir Analysis, Inc. General Shale Brick, Inc. 

Project Number: 447 

APPENDIX V 

CHAIN OF CUNTODY 
Sample Custody 

Page 15 of 133 
0 

0 

,•'.kAir #malysis, Inc. General Shale Brick, Inc. 

Project Number: 447 

APPEND• • 

CALIBRATION DATA 
7• 

7• 

7i 

7• 
17 
•317) 837- 8514 

('317) 837- 8518 FAX 

3904 Clarks Creek Road 

Plainfield, Indiana 46168 

PITOT TUBE CALIBRATION 

Reference: 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 2, Secbbn 2.1 

Calibration Date 

Probe Number/ID.., 

1/05/2007 

Six Foot Pmbe-A 

External Tubing Diameter 

Base To Opening Plane Distance (Pa). 

Base To Opening Plane Distance (Pb),, 

0.95 

1.25 cm 

1.25 cm 

Pb/Dt 

Pa/Dt 

Angle a I 

Measured 

Angle p 1 

Angle p 2 

1.32cm 

1 o32cm 

1 deg 

Angle ¢= 2 

1 deg 

0 deg 

0 deg 

z (cm) 0.0 

w (cm) 0.0 

If all cdteda are me• 

Pitot Coefficient is O. 84 

Allowable 

1.05DtsP<l.50Dt 

(0.997,5cm 1.42cm) 

1.05Dt•;Psl.50Dt 

(0.9975cm 1.42cm) 

and c• 2 < 10.0 Degrees 

and (] 2 < 10.0 Degrees 

and 13 2 a 5.0 Degrees 

and 13 2 < 5.0 Degrees 

z is less than 0.32cm 

(11s% 

w is less than 0.08cm 

(1/32nd") 

Pitot Coefficient:0.84 

Coii•ul Factor Mercury Thermometer "F 

ICE 

35 

AMBIENT 

55 56 

BOILING/HOT H20 

106 107 

Test performedby: ,••"• •;;•& Date of Test: 1/5/07 
(317) 837- 8514 

(317) 837- 8518 FAX 

3904 Clarks Creek Road 

Plainfield, Indiana 46168 

PITOT TUBE CALIBRATION 

Reference: 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 2, Section 2.1 

Calibration Date 

Probe Number/ID. 

1/O5/2007 

Six Foot Pmbe-B 

External Tubing Diameter 

Base To Opening Plane Distance (Pa) 

Base To Opening Plane Distance (Pb) 

0.95 

1.25 cm 

1.25 cm 

Pb/Dt 

Pa/Dt 

Angle a 1 

Angle a 2 

Angle I• 1 

Angle I• 2 

z (cm) 

w (•..•) 

Measured 

1.32cm 

1.32cm 

1 deg 

1 deg 

0 deg 

0 deg 

0.0 

0.0 

If all criteria are me• 

Pitot Coefficient is 0.84 

Uoi•u/ Factor Mercury Thermom_•._r "F 

AIIc;;¢ble 

1.05DI•P<I.50Dt 

(0.9975cm 1.42cm) 

1.05DtsP<I .50Dt 

(0.9975cm 1.42cm) 

a I and a 2 < 10.0 Degrees 

and a 2 < 10.0 Degrees 

and I• 2 < 5.0 Degrees 

and I• 2 < 5.0 Degrees 

z is less than 0.32cm 

(1/8 =•) 

w is less than 0.08cm 

(1/32nd") 

Pitot Coefficient:0.84 

ICE 

34 

AMBIENT 

56 56 

BOILING/HOT H20 

107 lO8 

Probe Res•nonse 

33 

Test performed by: Date of Test: 


Certificate of Analysis _EPA Protocol •di• e il•t•l•t•!, Procedure G1 

Notice: This Cylinder is not to be used when pressure is under 150 psig. Manufactured and certified at." Produced for customer: 

Linde Gas LLC 

Maumee Specialty Gas Plant 

6421 Monclova Road 

MAUMEE OH 43537 

419-893-7226 

Material: 6681 

EPA SO2/N2 100-3500 PPM 

Production #: 100125813 

Lot #: 02499J6280JA 

Cylinder #: CC154356 

Expiration Date: 10/12/2008 

Shelf Life: 24 months 

A31 

LINDE COLUMBUS INTERBRANCH 

450 GREENLAWN AVE 

COLUMBUS OH 43223 

USA 

614-443-7487 • \• ") •/• 

Blend Tolerance: 5 % Relative 

Blend Type: EPA Protocol 

Cyl. Pressure: 2000 psig 

Balance Gas: Ni•trogen 

CGA: 66O 

Analytical Accuracy: 1.00 % Relative 

Confidence: 95 % 

7446-09-5 Sulfur Dioxide 360 358 +/- 3.6 ppm 10/12/2006 7727-37-9 Nitrogen Balance 10/12/2006 

7446-09-5 Sulfur Dioxide CC100283 GMIS 503.5 ppm 09/27/2007 

All analyses are performed under controlled environmental conditions.This product is manufactured using equipment which has been calibrated with NIST traceable, or equivalent, standards, weights, or equipment. 

Analytical report approved by Roy Yoder 

 ertificat 
 iquib e Onologp orporation Industry Leader in Specialty Gases, Equipment and Service 

Certificate of Analysis 

EPA PROTOCOL GAS 

Customer 

Date_ 

Delive _ry Receipt 

Gas Standard 

Purchase Order 

Final Analysis Date 

Expiration Date 

Analytical Data 

EPA Protocol, Section No. 2.2•!Procedure G-1 

1E Monitoring Instruments, Inc (Worthington, Ohio) December 11, 2006 

DR-18365 

811.0 ppm Sulfur Dioxide/Nitrogen EPA PROTOCOl, 

789_._•2 

December 06, 2006 

December 06, 2008 

DO NOT USE BELOW 150 psig 

Reolicate Concentrations 

Sulfur Dioxide: 772.1 ppm +/- 7.7 atom 

Nitroeen: Balance 

Reference Standard(s): 

SRM/GMIS: 

Cylinder Number: 

Concentration: 

Expiration Date: 

GMIS 

CC-81408 

721.2 pprn SO2/Nitrogen 

October 13, 2008 

GMIS 

CC-56592 

913.4 ppm SO2/Nitrogen 

September 07, 2009 

Certification Instrumentation 

Component: 

Make/Model: 

Serial Ntnnber: 

Principal of Measurement: 

Last Calibration: 

Sulfur Dioxide 

Nicolet NEXUS 470 

AEP99000154 

FTIR 

December 06, 2006 

,Cylinder Data 

Cylinder Number: 

Cylinder Outlet: 

Expiration Date: 

CC-251962 

CGA 660 

December 06, 2008 

Cylinder Volume: 

Cylinder Pressure: 

140 Cubic Feet 

2000 psig, 70F 

Analytical uncertainty and NIST Traceability are in compliance with EPA-600/R-97/121. 

Certified by: 

Date: December 11, 2006 

Unmatched Excellence 

2564 Pemberton Drive Apopka, Florida 32703 Phone (407)-292-2990 Fax (407)-292-3313 
Certificate of Analysis 

Procedure GI 

Notice: This Cylinder is not to be used when pressure is under 150 psig. Manufactured and certified at: Produced for customer.. Linde Gas LLC 

Maumee Specialty Gas Plant 

6421 Monclova Road 

MAUMEE OH 43537 

419-893-7226 

Material: 6599 

EPA NO/N2 50-499 PPM A31 

Produ.etion #: 100125920 

Lot #: 02499J6280AX 

'•Cylinder #: -CC231133 

Expiration Date: 10/10/2008 

Shelf Life: 24 months 

LINDE COLUMBUS INTERBRANCH 

450 GREENLAWN AVE 

COLUMBUS OH 43223 

USA 

614-443-7487 I•3\•'• 

Blend Tolerance: 5 % Relative 

Blend Type: EPA Protocol 

Cyl. Pressure: 2000 psig 

Balance Gas: Nitrogen 

C•GA: 660 

Analytical Accuracy: 1.0(i % -R•la•iw 

Confidence: 95 % 

10102-43-9 Nitric Oxide •• •••'" ""•"i•'"•" •• • i"•ii•••• 7727-37-9 Nitrogen Balance 10/10/2006 

N/A NOx 448 ppm 10/10/2006 

•ol0z-,•3-u •tnc ox•ae ,CC10150 •, GMIS 246.3 ppm 05/27/2007 

Horiba CLA-510SS 568093024 Chemiluminescence 09/05/2006 

All analyses are performed under controlled environmental conditions.This product is manufactured using equipment which has been calibrated with NIST traceable, or equivalent, standards, w•eights, or equipment. 

Analytical report approved by Roy Yoder 

 ertificat 
Certificate of Analysis 

Procedure G1 

Notice: This Cylinder is not to be used when pressure is under 150 psig. Manufactured and certified at: Produced, for customer.. Linde Gas LLC 

Maumee Specialty Gas Plant 

6421 Monclova Road 

MAUMEE OH 43537 

419-893-7226 

LINDE COLUMBUS INTERBRANCH 

450 GREENLAWN AVE 

COLUMBUS OH 43223 

USA 

614-443-7487 • \ ,•,• 

Material: 6599 

EPA NO/N2 50-499 PPM 

Production #: 100125819 

Lot #: 02499J6280AY 

Cylinder #: CC168919 

Expiration Date: 10/10/2008 

Shelf Life: 24 months 

A31 

Blend Tolerance: 5 % Relative 

Blend Type: EPA Protocol 

Cyl. Pressure: 2000 psig 

Balance Gas: Nitrogen 

CGA: 660 

Analytical Accuracy: 1.00 % Relative 

Confidence: 95 % 

•u•vz-,•3-u Nitric Oxiae 275 270 +/- 3 ppm •)•)•• 7727-37-9 Nitrogen Balance 10/10/2006 

N/A NOx 270 ppm 10/10/2006 

10102-43-9 Nitric Oxide CC10150 GMIS 246.3 ppm 05/27/2007 

Horiba CLA-510SS 568093024 Chemiluminescence 09/05/2006 

All analyses are performed under controlled environmental conditions.This product is manufactured using equipment which has been calibrated with NIST traceable, or equivalent, standards, weights, or equipment. 

Analytical report approved by Roy Yoder 

g ertificat 
Certificate of Analysis 

• •,,,•L •...•PA P•otocol, rfor[n•]d. •c•;orai,• •.• •4.',•D(•/•).l, Procedure G1 

Notice: This Cylinder is 

Manufactured 

not to be used when pressure is under 150 psig. and certified at: Produced for customer: Linde Gas LLC 

Maumee Specialty Gas Plant 

6421 Monclova Road 

MAUMEE OH 43537 

419-893-7226 

Material: 2241 

LINDE COLUMBUS INTERBRANCH 

450 GREENLAWN AVE 

COLUMBUS OH 43223 

USA 

614-443-7487 

A31 

Blend Tolerance: 5 % Relative 

Blend Type: EPA Protocol 

Cyl. Pressure: 2000 psig Balance Gas: N•rogen 

CGA: 660 

Analytical Accuracy: 1.00 % Relative 

Confidence: 95 % 

EPA MISC 2 COMPONENT 

Production #: 100126003 

Lot #: 02499H4310S•I Cylinder #: CC59286 

Expiration Date: 10/25/2008 

Shelf Life: 24 months 

7446-09-5 Sulfur Dioxide 

7727-37-9 480 482 +/- 5 ppm 10/25/2005 Nitrogen Balance 10/25/2006 

Sulfur Dioxide CC163555 GMIS 503.7 ppm 09/27/2007 

Horiba VIA-510 4131546004 Non-Dispersive Infrared 09/07/2006 

been 

All analyses 

calibrated 

are performed under controlled environmental conditions.This product is manufactured using equipment which has with NIST traceable, or equivalent, standards, weights, or equipment. 

Analytical report approved by Roy Yoder 

Certificate 
 iquib ec nologp ( orporatiOn_o.,.o,, Industry Leader in Specialty Gases, Equipment and 8erviee •,,.-. •,• 

Certificate of Analysis 

EPA PROTOCOL GAS 

Customer 

Dat.___•e 

Delive _ry Receipt 

Gas Standard 

Purchase Order 

.Final Analysis Date 

•n Date 

EPA._ P.r0tocol_, Secti_on No.: 2..•.•P.rocedure G-1 a_ 

I_E Monitoring Instruments, Inc (Worthington, Ohio) February_ 06, 2006 

DR-16649 

_240.0 ppm Sulfur Dioxide/Nitrogen EPA PROTOCOL 

700____•6 

February_ 06, 2006 

February 06, 2008 

• DO NOT USE BELOW 150 psig 

Replicate Concentrations 

Sulfur Dioxide: 231.9 ppm +/- 2.3 ppm 

Nitroeen: Balance 

Reference Standard(s): 

SRM/GMIS: 

Cylinder Number: 

ConcentratiOn: 

Expiration Date: 

Certification Instrumentation 

Component: 

Make/Model: 

Serial N .u!nber: 

Principal of Measurement: 

Last Calibration: 

GMIS 

CC-125484 

99.6 ppm SO2/Nitrogen 

July 08, 2006 

Sulfur Dioxide 

Nicolet NEXUS 470 

AEP99000154 

FTIR 

February 02, 2006 

GMIS 

CC-117931 

246.9 ppm SO2/Nitrogen 

February25,2009 

Cylinder Data 

Cylinder Number: 

Cylinder Outlet: 

Expiration Date: 

CC-159003 

CGA 660 

February06,2008 

Cylinder Volume: 

Cylinder Pressure: 

140 Cubic Feet 

2000 psig, 70F 

Analytical uncertainty and •ST Traceability are in compliance 

Certified by: 

• [•• with EPA-600/R-97/121. 

Date: February 06, 2006 • 

(aoo) 

532-747 

Unmatched Excellence 

2564 Pemberton Drive Apopka, Florida 32703 Phone (407)-292-2990 Fax (407)--292-3313 
Industry Leader in Specialty Gases, Equipment and Service 

Certificate of Analysis 

EPA PROTOCOL GAS 

Customer 

Dat____ge 

...Delivery Receipt 

_Gas Standard 

Purchase Order 

_Final Analysis Date 

•ion Date 

EPA. protocol: Section No. 2. 5 Procedure G-1 a. 

I_E Monitoring Instruments, Inc (Worthington, Ohio) February 06, 2006 

_DR-16649 

..240.0 ppm Sulfur Dioxide/Nitrogen EPA PROTOCOl, 

700___.•6 

February 06, 2006' 

February 06, 2.008 

•l• ^ DO NOT USE BELOW 150 psig 

Replicate Concentrations 

Sulfur Dioxide: 231.9 ppm +/- 2.3 ppm 

Nitro•,en: Balance 

Reference Standard(s): 

SRMdGMIS: 

Cylinder Number: 

Concentration: 

Expiration Date: 

Certification Instrumentation 

Component: 

Make/Model: 

Serial Number: 

Principal bf Measurement: 

Last Calibration: 

GMIS 

CC-125484 

99.6 ppm SO2/Nitrogen 

July 08, 2006 

Sulfur Dioxide 

Nicolet NEXUS 470 

AEP99000154 

FTIR 

February 02, 2006 

GMIS 

CC-117931 

246.9 ppm SO2/Ni•ogen 

February25,2009 

Cylinder Data 

Cylinder Number: 

Cylinder Outlet: 

Expiration Date: 

CC-159003 

CGA 660 

February 06, 2008 

Cylinder Volume: 

Cylinder Pressure: 

140 Cubic Feet 

2000 psig, 70F 

Analytical uncertainty and •IST Traceability are in compliance •/•, • 

with EPA-600/R-97/121. 

Certified by: 

• [(•,/•g,d,¢.• Date: February 06, 2006 

(8oo) 

532-747 

Unmatched Excellence 

2564 Pemberton Drive Apopka, Florida 32703 Phone (407)-292-2990 Fax (407)-292-3313 
AAir Analysis, Inc. General Shale Brick, Inc. 

Project Number: 447 

APPENDIX VII 

VISIBLE EMISSIONS DATA 
CARL KOONTZ ASSOCIATES 

of Nashville, Tennessee 

is is to ack,•ledge that 

successfully participated In Visible Emissions 

tralnlng on.. 

and is qualified to evaluate Visible Emissions 

for a pedod of six (6) months from the date of 

certification. 

Instructor 
OF READINGS 

WErE 

C•RT•IEO BY 

Comments: 
X 
RUN NUMB 

X 

Plume 

NIGHE S r PE,•IO0 

C£RT•IEO BY 

Comments: 
•ir Analysis, Inc. General Shale Brick, Inc. 

Project Number: 447 

APPENDIX VIH 

SUBMITTED PROTOCOL 

•__•a•h" •ysis, Inc. General Shale Brick, inc. 

Project Number: 447 

APPE• • 

PROD UCTION DATA 
Mooresville Plant 32 Jaunary 24, 2006 Testing 

180.00 Cars/Week 

25.71 Cam/day 

5760.00 Brick/Car 

3.60 Ibs/brick Fired Weight 

11.11 tons/hour Production Rate 

Bicarb Fe• Rate 25% 216 Ibs/hour 
Mooresville Plant 32 Jaunary 24, 2006 Testing 

180.00 Cars/Week 

25.71 Cars/day 

5760.00 BdcldCar 

3.60 Ibs/bdck Fired Weight 

11.11 tons/hour Production Rate 

Bicarb Feed Rate 25% 216 Ibs/hour