alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

RIVERSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Respondent

v.

RIVERSIDE EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT

PERSONNEL ASSOCIATION ESP

- PSEA

NEA,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 625 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of April, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 5, 2011

h0928 

# Order

October 5, 2011

143252 & (41)

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Trustee for The MLMI Trust Series 2005-FFH1 Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143252 COA: 302193 VERITA HINES-FLAGG, Wayne CC: 10-011505-AV Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 14, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The mo tion to stay the trial court proceedings is DENIED.
From: Halford Nancy (NORALNM) [ mailto:Nancy.Halford@noralinc.com ]

Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 6:22 PM To: Putney, David Cc: Robuck, Steve (NORALINC); Jones Mark (NORALNM); Ba ckfisch Don (NORALNM) Subject: ICR data



### The Excel files and the pdf report were uploaded to day to the site you mentioned below. I will be sen ding a CD in the mail to you as well. Please let me know if you need anything else.

Nancy Halford Environmental Chemist Noranda (NYSE NOR) office: 573-643-2361 x2184 email: nancy.halford@noralinc.com website: http://www.norandaaluminum.com



### p. 1 of 1
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0005801 15-APR-2014 09:01 AM
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1251

ELSA TEKLE WOLDEMARIAM, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, United States Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A78-612-529) Submitted: September 24, 2003 Decided: February 23, 2004 Before LUTTIG, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aragaw Mehari, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Margaret J. Perry, Senior Litigation Counsel, Lisa A. Watts, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Elsa Tekle Woldemariam, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the denial of asylum based on the reasoning of the Immigration Judge (IJ). We have reviewed the administrative record and find no error in the IJ’s conclusion that Woldemariam was firmly resettled in Italy and is thus ineligible for asylum. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), (D) (2000); 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(2)(A)(vi) (2000); Mussie v. INS , 172 F.3d 329, 331-32 (4th Cir. 1999). As the firm resettlement bar applies here, Woldemariam’s contentions that she has a well-founded fear of future persecution and challenges to the IJ’s findings that the fear is not objectively reasonable are misplaced. We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 74

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the

20th annual National Peace Officers’ MemorialService.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 74

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

•HCON 74 EH

1 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL

2 PEACE OFFICERS’ MEMORIAL SERVICE.

3 The National Fraternal Order of Police and its auxil4 iary shall be permitted to sponsor a public event, the 20th

5 annual National Peace Officers’ Memorial Service, on the

6 Capitol Grounds on May 15, 2001, or on such other date

7 as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the

8 Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate

9 may jointly designate, in order to honor the law enforce10 ment officers who died in the line of duty during 2000.

11 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

12 (a) IN GENERAL.—The event authorized by section

13 1 shall be free of admission charge to the public and ar14 ranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress, under

15 conditions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol

16 and the Capitol Police Board.

17 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The National

18 Fraternal Order of Police and its auxiliary shall assume

19 full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident

20 to all activities associated with the event.

21 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

22 Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Cap23 itol, the National Fraternal Order of Police and its auxil24 iary are authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds

25 such stage, sound amplification devices, and other related
3

•HCON 74 EH

1 structures and equipment, as may be required for the

2 event authorized by section 1.

3 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

4 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce5 ment of the restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act

6 of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), con7 cerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations

8 on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions appli9 cable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event

10 authorized by section 1.

Passed the House of Representatives May 8, 2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 93 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 93

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 4, 2001

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives 
         and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Wednesday, April 
4, 2001, or Thursday, April 5, 2001, on a motion offered pursuant to 
this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 
stand

adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, April 24, 2001, or until noon on the 
second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 
2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when 
the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on Friday, 
April 6, 2001, Saturday, April 7, 2001, Sunday, April 8, 2001, or 
Monday, April 9, 2001, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent 
resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or 
adjourned until noon on Monday, April 23, 2001, or until such time on 
that day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his designee in 
the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after 
Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 3, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-2325

___________________________

Debra Sparks,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee.

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison

____________

 Submitted: February 20, 2015

Filed: March 5, 2015 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Debra Sparks appeals the district court’s1

 order affirming the denial of disability

insurance benefits and supplemental security income. For reversal, Sparks argues that

the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred in his determination, because he failed to

find that (1) her severe impairments included borderline intellectual functioning and

(2) her mental impairment met Listing 12.05C. Following careful review of the

parties’ submissions and the record before us, we conclude that the doctrine of

collateral estoppel precludes Sparks from relitigating whether her mental impairment

met Listing 12.05C. See Hardy v. Chater, 64 F.3d 405, 407 (8th Cir. 1995). We

further conclude that substantial evidence in the record as a whole supports the ALJ’s

findings regarding the credibility of Sparks’s subjective complaints, and the severity

of her impairments. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See 8th

Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________

1

The Honorable Erin L. Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent

of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly
report of GlobalOptions Group, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey O. Nyweide, Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:





1.
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





November
      12,
      2009
              
              /s/ Jeffrey O. NyweideName:
              Jeffrey
      O. NyweideTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer, Executive Vice
                President
      – Corporate Development, and
                Secretary
      (Principal Financial Officer and
                Principal
      Accounting Officer)
WASHOE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 

AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DIVISION o 

PubHcHealth 

July 30, 2012 

Ms. Colleen Cripps, Ph.D. 

Administrator 

Division of Environmental Protection 

90 IS. Stewart St., Suite 400 I 

Carson City NV 89701-5249 

Dear Ms. Cripps: 

Prevent. Promote. Protect. 

Enclosed is a revision to the Washoe County portion of Nevada's PM2.5 Infrastructure State 

Implementation Plan (I-SIP). This revision was adopted at a public hearing ofthe Washoe 

County District Board of Health (DBOH) on June 28, 2012. The submittal includes: 

• Proof of publication for the public hearing; 

• Request for parallel processing dated June 21, 2012; 

• DBOH Agenda for the June 28, 2012 public hearing; 

• Staff report including DBOH Regulations Governing Air Quality Management Sections 

030.023,030.218,030.230,030.235, and 030.970; 

• Approved minutes from the June 28, 2012 public hearing; and 

• Certificate of Adoption. 

Two paper and two electronic copies ofthe submittal are enclosed. The electronic copies are 

exact duplicates of the paper copy submittal in searchable pdf format. Please review these 

documents and determine if this submittal is complete. If so, then please forward one paper and 

one electronic copy to the U.S. EPA Region IX office. If you have any questions or comments 

regarding this submittal, feel free to contact Mr. Daniel Inouye or me at (775) 784-7200 . 

.. 

/Sir.:~~' /.1 (,/), .::: /~fi /f.)Z/~ 

Kevin Dick 

Director 

Enclosures 

cc: Daniel Inouye, Washoe County Health District - AQMD (w/o enclosures) 

P.O. BOX 11130 Reno, NY 89520-0027· (775) 784-7200 • FAX (775) 784-7225 

www.washoecounty.us/health WASHOE COUNTYIS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER HIRING EMPLOYMENT ELlGIBLEAPPLlCANTS 

Printed on Recyded Paper
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Nick D. TAYLOR.

No. 87-KK-1918.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 11, 1987.

Reconsideration Denied Oct. 9, 1987.

PER CURIAM.

Writ denied.

Pursuant to an order from this court, the trial judge conducted a pretrial hearing on the admissibility of the attorney-client communications. The evidence credited by the trial judge established that the communications, more probably than not, were made in pursuit of a criminal act of conspiracy to hide the apparent murder weapon and are not protected by the attorney-client privilege.

DENNIS, J., concurs but notes that the privilege is still intact and enforceable as to those attorney-client communications not made in furtherance of a criminal act.
· .. ·,.·. 

Adams, Kevin (OST) · 

From: 

sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Cohn, Robert E. <robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com> 

Tuesday, May 08, 2012 4:35 PM '.·,·· 1 1 

Adams, Kevin (OST) ' ' t. 

Daniel Shurz (Daniei.Shurz@flyfrontier.com); Cohn, Robert E. 

Revised RHI Hold in Subsidy Calculation-Confidential 

Documentl.docx 

2 L! !:.'J 3: 2 3 

Kevin, in preparation for our rate conference tomorrow attached is a revised subsidy calculation for 

Chautauqua's hold in service at Rhinelander. The difference between this presentation and the one I 

sent you on May 1 is that the entire ownership cost of the ER-145 aircraft is assigned to Rhinelander. 

That aircraft cannot be used for any other services for the simple reason that Chautauqua has no ER145 flight crew time availability except the crews dedicated to the RHI hold in service. Daniel Shurz 

can explain this in more detail on our call tomorrow. 

Regards, 

Bob 

About Hogan Lovells 

Hogan Lovells is an international legal practice th~t includes Hogan Lovells US LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP. For more information, see 

www.hoga:nrovells.com. 

CONFIDENTIALITY. This email and any attachments are confidential, except where the email states it can be disclosed; it may also be privileged. If 

received in error, please do not disclose the contents to anyone, but notify the sender by return email and delete this email (and any attachments) from 

your system.' 

1 
. -• :·· :. '", ·.,. 

Chautauqua Airlines, Inc. 

Second Revised RHI Hold-In Compensation Requirement 

Effective Date 3/1/2012 

Distance 201 

Aircraft ERJ-145 

Seats so 

Hub MKE 

Pax .13,400 

Average Fare $90.00 

Weekly Round Trips 12 

Annual Flights 1227 

Block Time 0.875 

Block Hours 1074 

Pax Revenue $1,205,550 

Other @$4.35/pax $58,290 

Total Revenue $1,263,840 

Flight Crew @$240/dep $294,480 

Fuel @ $1216/hr $1,306,038 •.. 

Maintenance @ $828/ht>ur $889,272 

Aircraft @ $1336/hour $1.434,864 

$3,924,654 

,.I 

Distribution@ $7.15/pax $95,810 

Station $636,591 

Sum of Above Expenses $4,657,055 

Overhead @ 12.73% $592,843 

Totallndirects $1,325,244 

Total Operating Expense $5,249,898 

Profit@ 5% $262,495 

Total Economic Cost $5,512,393 

Subsidy $4,248,553 

Subsidy/Departure $3,463
[No. 14799-1-III.

Division Three.

July 25, 1996.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Linda Diane Isaacs, *Respondent,*and Michael Patrick Isaacs, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment *of*the Superior Court for Lincoln County, No. 85-3-00680-6, Philip W. Borst, J., entered March 14, 1995. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, C.J., concurred in by Munson and Schultheis, JJ.
EXHIBIT
      3.4




ARTICLES
      OF AMENDMENT TO


ARTICLES
      OF INCORPORATION


OF


LIFESCIENCES
      OPPORTUNITIES INCORPORATED




The
      undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer of LIFESCIENCES OPPORTUNITIES
      INCORPORATED, a Florida corporation (the “Corporation”), does hereby certify
      that the Amendment provided for herein to change the name of the Corporation
      was
      adopted unanimously by Written Consent of the Board of Directors of the
      Corporation on April 1, 2008, and written consent of shareholders owning a
      majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote of the Corporation, in
      accordance with the provisions of Chapter 607 of the General Corporation Law
      of
      the State of Florida, and the number of votes cast in favor of the Amendments
      was sufficient to carry the motion.




1.
      Article I of the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended
      to read as follows:




“CORPORATE
      NAME




The
      name
      of this Corporation shall be: DR. TATTOFF, INC.”




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer of the
      Corporation, has executed this Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of
      Lifesciences Opportunities Incorporated, a Florida corporation, the 19th day
      of
      May, 2008, for the purpose of amending the Articles of Incorporation under
      Section 607.1006, Florida Statutes, and does hereby certify that the facts
      herein stated are true and correct, and were approved by the votes of
      Shareholders owning a majority of the shares entitled to vote and the vote
      was
      sufficient to carry the motion.




LIFESCIENCES
                OPPORTUNITIES INCORPORATED,a
                Florida corporationBy:
            /s/
                John P. KeefeJohn
                P. Keefe, Chief Executive Officer
allegiant'" 

August 22, 2014 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building, Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Docket No. FAA-2014-0451; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-122-AD 

• 

To Whom It May Concern; 

Allegiant Air requests the FAA note that the proposed AD is related to AD 2007-

10-04. Per Boeing SB MD80-55A070, any cracks found during inspection will 

affect compliance with FAA AD 2007-10-04. Additionally, current aircraft status 

of Boeing SB MD80-55A065, as referenced in AD 2007-10-04, provides 

configuration definition to the proposed rulemaking per the table in Boeing SB 

MD80-55A, para l.A. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

Christopher House 

Manager, Governmental Affairs 

Allegiant Travel Company 

•••••• ·.. .... ..... .0: . 

8360 S. Durango Drive · Las Vegas, Nevada 89113 " 702.851.7300 702.851.7301 allegiant.com
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 325

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part

of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the

Holocaust.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 12, 2002

Mr. NEY (for himself, Mr. HOYER, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. FROST, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. CANNON, Mr. DAVIS of Florida, Mr. LANTOS,

and Mr. CANTOR) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on House Administration

FEBRUARY 12, 2002

Committee on House Administration discharged; considered under suspension

of the rules and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of

remembrance of victims of the Holocaust.

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized

3 to be used on April 9, 2002, for a ceremony as part of

4 the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims
2

•HCON 325 ATH

1 of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremony

2 shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as

3 the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

Æ
# Bid Award

# Capacity Utilization
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 04620

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

04620\04620_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 04620\04620_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04620\04620_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04620\04620_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04620\Certification Statement Plant ID 04620.pdf Plant certification statement

04620\Supplemental Documents\04620_1971 Environmental Report A2-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04620\Supplemental Documents\04620_WB-1 A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04620\Supplemental Documents\04620_WB-2 A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04620\Supplemental Documents\04620_WB-3 A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04620\04620_Checklist_102210_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04620\04620_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.