alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 93

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives

and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 3, 2001

Mr. OXLEY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of

Representatives and a conditional recess or adjournment

of the Senate.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Wednesday, April 4, 2001, or Thursday, April

4 5, 2001, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent

5 resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand

6 adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, April 24, 2001, or

7 until noon on the second day after Members are notified

8 to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent res9 olution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate

10 recesses or adjourns at the close of business on Friday,
2

HCON 93 ATH

1 April 6, 2001, Saturday, April 7, 2001, Sunday, April 8,

2 2001, or Monday, April 9, 2001, on a motion offered pur3 suant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader

4 or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon

5 on Monday, April 23, 2001, or until such time on that

6 day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his des7 ignee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon

8 on the second day after Members are notified to reassem9 ble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

10 whichever occurs first.

11 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

12 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

13 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead14 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

15 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

16 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-60449

Summary Calendar

____________

Jaivanti Kumari; Pooja Sharma; Sahil Sharma; Simran 

Sharma, 

Petitioners,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, 

Respondent.

______________________________

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Agency Nos. A205-362-600, A205-362-602,

A205-362-603, A205-362-604

______________________________

Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Petitioners Jaivanti Kumari and Pooja Sharma,1 natives and citizens of 

Pakistan, request our review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

1 The Petitioners are a mother (Kumari), her two minor children, and her adult 

daughter (Sharma). The minors are derivatives on Kumari’s application. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 31, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-60449 Document: 00516769174 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/31/2023
No. 22-60449

2

(BIA) dismissing their appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of their 

application for asylum and withholding of removal. 

We review for substantial evidence and will not disturb the BIA’s 

decision unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. Zhang v. 

Gonzales, 432 F.3d 339, 344 (5th Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks and 

citation omitted). Petitioners fail to present such evidence. The harms

alleged do not show past persecution. See Gjetani v. Barr, 968 F.3d 393, 397 

(5th Cir. 2020). Petitioners also have not shown error in connection with the 

BIA’s conclusions that they did not have an objectively reasonable fear of 

future persecution and could avoid harm by relocating within Pakistan. See

Eduard v. Ashcroft, 379 F.3d 182, 193 (5th Cir. 2003); Zhao v. Gonzales, 404 

F.3d 295, 308 (5th Cir. 2005). Past persecution or a likelihood of future 

persecution is an essential element of claims for asylum or withholding of 

removal. Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 906 (5th Cir. 2002); Jaco v. Garland, 

24 F.4th 395, 402 (5th Cir. 2021). Petitioners fail to show that the evidence 

compels a conclusion contrary to the BIA’s ruling on their eligibility for 

asylum or withholding of removal. See Jaco, 24 F.4th at 402; Efe, 293 F.3d at 

906; INS v. Bagamasbad, 429 U.S. 24, 25 (1976). We thus need not consider 

their remaining arguments. 

The petition for review is DENIED.

Case: 22-60449 Document: 00516769174 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/31/2023
2020 ATTACHMENT C – USEFUL LINKS

USDA, AMS, Dairy Program:

https://www.ams.usda.gov/about-ams/programs-offices/dairy-program

USDA, AMS, Research and Promotion Programs:

https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/research-promotion

USDA, Choose My Plate: https://www.choosemyplate.gov/

USDA, FNS, Dietary Guidelines for Americans: 

https://www.fns.usda.gov/cnpp/dietary-guidelines-americans

USDA, Nutrition.gov: https://www.nutrition.gov/

USDA, National Agriculture Library, Food and Nutrition Information Center: 

https://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic

U.S. Federal Trade Commission, Advertising and Marketing: 

https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/business-center/advertising-and-marketing

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Labeling & Nutrition Guidance Documents & Regulatory 

Information: 

http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/Labe

lingNutrition
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 538 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 538

Commending the Wesleyan University Men's Lacrosse Team for winning the 
   2018 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III Men's 
                         Lacrosse Championship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 7, 2018

  Mr. Blumenthal (for himself and Mr. Murphy) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Commending the Wesleyan University Men's Lacrosse Team for winning the 
   2018 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III Men's 
                         Lacrosse Championship.

Whereas, on Sunday, May 27, 2018, the Wesleyan University Men's Lacrosse Team 
        (referred to in this preamble as ``Wesleyan'') won the 2018 National 
        Collegiate Athletic Association (referred to in this preamble as the 
        ``NCAA'') Division III title with an 8-6 win over the Salisbury Sea 
        Gulls at Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, Massachusetts;
Whereas this is the first NCAA lacrosse national championship for Wesleyan; and
Whereas Wesleyan finished the 2018 season with a record of 19-3: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commends the Wesleyan University Men's Lacrosse Team 
        for winning the 2018 National Collegiate Athletic Association 
        Division III title;
            (2) congratulates the fans, students, and faculty of 
        Wesleyan University; and
            (3) respectfully requests that the Secretary of the Senate 
        transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to--
                    (A) the President of Wesleyan University, Michael 
                S. Roth; and
                    (B) the Head Coach of the Wesleyan University Men's 
                Lacrosse Team, John Raba.
                                 <all>
```
Second Amendment to the Employment with J.P. Causey Jr.



 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO 
 EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of August 12, 2005, between Chesapeake Corporation, a Virginia corporation (the “Company”), and J.P. Causey Jr. (the “Executive”). 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into an amended and
restated Executive Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated April 22, 2003, amended on January 3, 2005; and 
  
 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement, the Agreement may be amended by mutual consent of the Company and the Executive; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement;

  
 NOW THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended in the
following respects: 
  
 Section 1 (b) is amended to read as
follows: 
  
 (b) The period described in paragraph (a) shall be
extended for an additional twelve months unless the Company, before each November 1 of any year, provides written notice to the Executive that the period will not be extended. The preceding sentence shall first be effective to extend the period
described in paragraph (a) until December 31, 2008, unless written notice to the contrary is provided to the Executive by the Company before November 1, 2005. 
  

Except as provided above, the terms of the Agreement, dated April 22, 2003, and amended January 3, 2005 shall remain in effect. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Second Amendment to
Executive Employment Agreement to be duly executed on its behalf and the Executive has duly executed this Second Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement, all as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	EXECUTIVE	 	CHESAPEAKE CORPORATION
		
	 /s/ J.P. Causey Jr

	 	 /s/ Andrew J. Kohut


	J.P. Causey Jr	 	Andrew J. Kohut
	 	 	President
H. Con. Res. 487 Agreed to November 14, 2002

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING PRINTING OF VOLUME OF TRANSCRIPTS

OF NEW YORK CITY MEETING AND STATEMENTS ON TERRORIST ATTACKS OF SEPTEMBER 11.

(a) IN GENERAL.—A volume consisting of the transcripts of

the ceremonial meeting of the House of Representatives and Senate

in New York City on September 6, 2002, and a collection of statements by Members of the House of Representatives and Senators

on the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, shall be printed

as a House document under the direction of the Joint Committee

on Printing, with suitable binding.

(b) STATEMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN VOLUME.—A statement

by a Member of the House of Representatives or a Senator on

the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, shall be included in

the volume printed under subsection (a) if the statement—

(1) was printed in the Congressional Record prior to the

most recent date on which the House of Representatives

adjourned prior to the date of the regularly scheduled general

election in November 2002; and

(2) is approved for inclusion in the volume by the Committee on House Administration of the House of Representatives (in the case of a statement by a Member of the House)

or the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate

(in the case of a statement by a Senator).

SEC. 2. NUMBER OF COPIES.

The number of copies of the document printed under section

1 shall be 15,000 casebound copies, of which—

(1) 15 shall be provided to each Member of the House

of Representatives;

(2) 25 shall be provided to each Senator; and

(3) the balance shall be distributed by the Joint Committee

on Printing to Members of the House of Representatives and

Senators, based on requests submitted to the Joint Committee

by Members and Senators.
H. Con. Res. 487—2

SEC. 3. MEMBER DEFINED.

In this concurrent resolution, the term ‘‘Member of the House

of Representatives’’ includes a Delegate or Resident Commissioner

to the Congress.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
**
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

***In connection with the Annual Report of Vahanna Tech Edge Acquisition I Corp. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Raahim Don, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as ofthe date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:***

 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. 

This Certification has not been, and shall not bedeemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

 
Date: March 31, 2022  By: 
/s/ Raahim Don
   Name: Raahim Don   Title: Chief Financial Officer
This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request. 
**
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

I, Carey G. Birmingham, Chief Financial Officer of College Oak Investments,
Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2005 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

(2) information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of College
Oak Investments, Inc.

Date: November 2, 2005

                                                /s/ Carey G. Bimingham
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Carey G. Birmingham
                                                Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos

    Coronavirus Disease 2019

    Air Force Art Collection





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2021

    Focus on Priorities

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    CSAF Leadership Library    
        CSAF Leadership Library Bookshelf

    2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers





    Contact Us  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (0.71 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR ActOSI Tip Line
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,865
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  323,325
<ALLOWANCES>                                   116,539
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,031,679
<PP&E>                                         112,825
<DEPRECIATION>                                  84,367
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,281,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,395,192
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,661
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,837,128
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,281,533
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,137,675
<CGS>                                        4,571,399
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,571,399
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,960,236
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,389,485)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,731,470)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,658,015)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)
        




</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19I0191. WILLIAM SCOTT FUSCI v. THE STATE.

On February 8, 2019, the trial court entered an order granting in part and

denying in part a motion to suppress filed by William Scott Fusci. A certificate of

immediate review was entered on February 20, 2019, and Fusci filed this application

for interlocutory appeal on February 24, 2019. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), a party may request interlocutory review only if the

trial court certifies within ten days of entry of the order at issue that immediate review

should be had. Atimely certificate of immediate review is a jurisdictionalrequirement.

See Von Waldner v. Baldwin/Cheshire, Inc., 133 Ga. App. 23, 24 (2) (209 SE2d 715)

(1974). If the certificate of immediate review is not entered within the prescribed tenday period, it is untimely, and the party seeking review must wait until the final

judgment to appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b);Turner v. Harper, 231 Ga. 175, 176 (200

SE2d 748) (1973).

Here, the certificate of immediate review was entered twelve days after entry of

the order on appeal. Although the trial courtsigned the certificate of immediate review

on February 18, 2019, the relevant date for determining the timeliness of the certificate

is the date it was entered. See Van Schallern v. Stanco, 130 Ga. App. 687 (204 SE2d

317) (1974). To remedy this untimeliness, Fusci requested that the trial court vacate

and reenter its order. On March 5, 2019 – after the application had been docketed in

this Court – the trial court vacated and reentered the suppression order and issued a

new certificate of immediate review. An untimely certificate of immediate review,

however, may not be remedied in this manner. See, e. g. Summer Tree Club

Apartments Associates v. Graves Const. Co., 140 Ga. App. 214, 214 (230 SE2d 503)

March 26, 2019
(1976) (an untimely application for immediate review cannot be revived by

amendment); Whitlock v. State, 124Ga. App. 599, 601 (1) (185 SE2d 90) (1971), rev’d

in part on other grounds, 230 Ga. 700 (198 SE2d 865) (1973) (“A nunc pro tunc entry

of a certificate for immediate review cannot revive a right of appeal which has

expired.”);see also Court of Appeals Rule 16 (d) (prohibiting extensions of time in the

filing of interlocutory applications).

Accordingly, because the trial court did not enter the certificate of immediate

review within ten days of entry of the order at issue, we lack jurisdiction to consider

this application, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/26/2019