alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 67 (Friday, April 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8320]



[[Page 20850]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Bureau of Labor Statistics


Data Users Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting and Agenda

    The Bureau of Labor Statistics Data Users Advisory Committee will 
meet on Thursday May 17, 2012. The meeting will be held in the Postal 
Square Building, 2 Massachusetts Avenue NE.; Washington, DC.
    The Committee provides advice to the Bureau of Labor Statistics 
from the points of view of data users from various sectors of the U.S. 
economy, including the labor, business, research, academic, and 
government communities, on technical matters related to the collection, 
analysis, dissemination, and use of the Bureau's statistics, on its 
published reports, and on the broader aspects of its overall mission 
and function.
    The meeting will be held in Meeting Rooms 1, 2, and 3 of the Postal 
Square Building Conference Center. The schedule and agenda for the 
meeting are as follows:
    8:30 a.m. Registration.
    8:45 a.m. Introductions, welcome, and brief review of agency 
developments.
    9 a.m. Federal Advisory Committee Membership.
    9:15 a.m. Employment Measures by Age of Firm.
    10:15 a.m. Treatment of Contractors in BLS Data.
    1 p.m. Prospectus on New Benefit Cost Measures.
    2 p.m. Reinventing the Monthly Labor Review.
    3:15 p.m. Brainstorming Session--suggestions for data or program 
improvements.
    3:45 p.m. Meeting wrap-up.
    4 p.m. The Shifting Composition of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses 
(extra/optional topic for interested members).
    The meeting is open to the public. Any questions concerning the 
meeting should be directed to Kathy Mele, Data Users Advisory 
Committee, on 202-691-6102. Individuals who require special 
accommodations should contact Ms. Mele at least two days prior to the 
meeting date.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of April 2012.
Kimberley D. Hill,
Chief, Division of Management Systems, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
[FR Doc. 2012-8320 Filed 4-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-24-P
### January 20, 2014 Office ofthe Clerk 

### First Court ofAppeals 301 Fannin Street 

### Houston, Texas 77002-2066

Attn: Jessie Texas Writ Works 

### 6804-E Hwy 6 South #525

Houston, Texas 77083 

### (832) 794-3787 

### Fax: (281)277-8734 texaswritworks(a),aol .com

FILED IN 1ST COURTOFAPPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 

### JAN 23 2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK. 

### Re: Request for Reproduction Costs ofClerk & Reporter's Records for: Williams v. State, Case Numbers: 01-13-00111-CR and No. 01-13-00361-CR.

Dear Sir/Madam: 

### I am interested in purchasing a copy ofthe Clerk and Reporter's records (only) for the 

### above-styled and numbered cases. Please do a page count and advise me of what the reproductions costs involved are for these two cases at my address, email or phone listed above. Thank you for your kind attention to this matter. Sincerely, David C. Bolton 

### Certified Paralegal Cc: Filei
- Vrit Works; i ' ilwyf.Soulh:

.. ;lliHii(lon.'Ti.'xas 77i)X3



### Offiee ofttiaCjerk 

## First Court of Appeals, 

## 301 Fannin Styreet Houston, Texas 77002--2066

•-7 ••t-"Ci022@.S&!3S 21 "JAW c* PW 1 t

RECEIVED FIRSTCOURTOFAPPEALS HOUSTON. TEXAS 

## JAN£32tW CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK ^______ =J 

## i''l''i'i^u'hiii'ihl'»liiWI)llllJi'»l'ni''ilj'If''i!''
#### Raymond BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

No. 6961.

Court of Appeals of Alaska.

Jan. 14, 1983.

Paul Canarsky, Asst. Public Defender, Fairbanks, and Dana Fabe, Public Defender, Anchorage, for appellant.

Teresa L. Foster, Asst. Dist. Atty., Harry L. Davis, Dist. Atty., Fairbanks, and Wilson L. Condon, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellee.

Before BRYNER, C.J., and COATS and SINGLETON, JJ.

*1325OPINION

SINGLETON, Judge.

Raymond Baker was convicted of kidnapping G.J. AS 11.41.300. Kidnapping is an unclassified offense. The penalty is five years to ninety-nine years. AS 12.55.125(b). Baker was previously convicted of burglary and received a suspended imposition of sentence. AS 12.55.085. He was on probation at the time he committed this offense. The record reflects that Baker assisted Bradford Wilson in kidnapping the victim and restrained her so that Wilson could sexually assault her. Baker did not have sexual contact with the victim. When the sexual assault was concluded, the two took turns kicking the victim until she was unconscious. She was then left naked by the road to die. The outside temperature was thirty degrees above zero. Fortunately, a passerby found G.J., thus saving her life. She was able to provide the police with information leading to the arrest of her assailants. The trial court sentenced Baker to a twenty-year term consecutive to the burglary sentence. He then sentenced Baker to five years on the burglary conviction and suspended all five years. Baker therefore faces twenty-five years with five suspended as a result of these two unrelated offenses. He appeals contending that the sentence imposed is excessive. He points out that the court found that his role in the offense was passive compared to Wilson’s and that he pled guilty and testified against Wilson. Wilson received twenty years for the kidnapping and ten years (to run consecutively) for the sexual assault. His appeal is pending.

We have reviewed the record and have concluded that the sentence imposed was not clearly mistaken. *Davis v. State,*635 P.2d 481 (Alaska App.1981).

The sentence of the superior court is AFFIRMED.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

48–176 PDF WASHINGTON : 2022

S. HRG. 114–846

[ERRATA] 

VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS’ BUSINESS

MODEL: THE REPERCUSSIONS FOR

PATIENTS AND THE HEALTH

CARE SYSTEM

HEARING 

BEFORE THE

SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON AGING

UNITED STATES SENATE

ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS

SECOND SESSION

WASHINGTON, DC

APRIL 27, 2016

Serial No. 114–24

Printed for the use of the Special Committee on Aging

( 

Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.govinfo.gov
[ERRATA] 

An error was made in the hearing Valeant Pharmaceuticals’

Business Model: the Repercussions for Patients and the

Health Care System. The name Priscilla Hanley was inadvertently listed in the Committee member section instead of Mark B.

LeDuc as the Majority Staff Director for the Special Committee

on Aging.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Dale B. Smith,certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Mueller Group, Inc.;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         [Reserved]

(c)          Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(d)         Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February2, 2006
|        | /s/ DALE B.  SMITH        |
|--------|--------------------------------|
|   | Name: Dale B. Smith            |
|   | Title: Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 239 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 239

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 16, 2001

Received and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 
                                Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress that schools in the United States 
should set aside a sufficient period of time to allow children to pray 
 for, or quietly reflect on behalf of, the Nation during this time of 
        struggle against the forces of international terrorism.

Whereas section 4 of title 4, United States Code, establishes the Pledge of 
        Allegiance to the Flag and describes such Pledge as including the phrase 
        ``one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all'';
Whereas in 1954 President Dwight D. Eisenhower, referring to the reference to 
        God in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, said that the Nation had 
        reaffirmed ``the

transcendence of religious faith in America's heritage and future; in this 
way we shall constantly strengthen those spiritual weapons which forever 
will be our country's most powerful resource in peace and war''; and

Whereas President George W. Bush has asked the people of the United States to 
        pray for those who suffered as a result of the atrocities committed 
        against the United States on September 11, 2001: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that schools in the United States 
should set aside a sufficient period of time to allow children to pray 
for, or quietly reflect on behalf of, the Nation during this time of 
struggle against the forces of international terrorism.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 15, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

FRANK AIELLO,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 218 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

FRANK AIELLO,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 219 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21st day of December, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
----

**Exhibit 99.5**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Darren Moulds, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Alpine Summit Energy Partners, Inc.:

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

 

| Date: April 26, 2022 | By:    | *"Darren Moulds"*                            |
|----------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                 |   | Darren Moulds                                |
|                 |   | Chief Financial Officer                      |
|                 |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
Order filed May 10, 2012

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 11

- 01020

- CR

____________ CHRISTEN LEE SHANEHC HIAN , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Crim Ct at Law No 6

Harris County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. 1689765



### ORDER
A motion to supplement the record on appeal with S tate 's E xhibit No. 3, a DVD,
was filed in this Court on March 26, 2012. On March 26 , 2012 the Court ordered the Clerk of the County Criminal Court at Law No. 6 to file the exhibit with this Cour t on or before April 9, 2012. Although the exhibit was filed with this Court on April 9, 2012, the
Court inadvertently issued as second order on May 7, 2012 for the ex h ibit to be filed. Because the exhibit was previously filed with the Court, we WITHDRAW our May 7,
2012 order as moot.

PER CURIAM
-----Forwarded by Ronald Jordan/D C/USEPA/US on 11/3 0/2011 09:27AM -----

To: Maryt Smith/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Eric Holder" <EHolder@indepmo.org> Date: 11/30/2011 09:14AM Cc: Andrew Hanson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Ronald Jordan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "Don Reimal" <DReimal@indepmo.org> Subject: EPA ELGs for the Steam Electric Industry (See attached file: EPA ELG Ltr_COI.pdf)

** High Priority **

Dear Ms. Smith,

Thank you for holding the UMRA/Federalism briefing on the proposed ELGs on October 11, 2011. Our Mayor, as well as other city staff, attended the briefing and had many unanswered questions regarding the costs of the potential ELG options. We respectfully submit the attached letter explaining the unique budgetary challenges that municipal utilities face and requesting that EPA provide detailed information on the cost of each ELG option. Our hope is that EPA will consider the budgetary limitations municipalities face as it finalizes the proposed rule.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Regards, Eric Holder Environmental Program Supervisor Independence Power & Light

21500 E. Truman Road Independence, MO 64051 (816) 325-7455 off (816) 325-7474 fax (816) 365-2378 cell 

### Pa g e 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**INTERLINEBRANDS, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Interline Brands, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 25, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas J.Tossavainen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)                                The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| /S/ THOMAS J.  TOSSAVAINEN |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Thomas J. Tossavainen      |   |
| Chief Financial Officer    |   |
| November 2,  2009     |   |

 

----
Attachment E

Work Sheets used to Calculate Reg istrant Labor Costs

This attachment is available as part of the electronic docket EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2013

- 0493 and is

part of the ICR’s Supporting Statement.

NAICS: 325300

Pesticide, Fertilizer, and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing

Labor Category: For mula Managerial Technical Clerical

Unloaded Hourly Rate 1 = W $54.34 $28.88 $17.23

Benefits Percentage 2 Lb = B/W 44% 44% 44%

Benefits per hour B = W*Lb $24.15 $12.84 $7.66

Loaded Hourly Rate Wb = W + B =

W(1+Lb) $78.49 $41.72 $24.89

Overhead Percentage 3 Lo = OH/Wb 50% 50% 50%

Overhead per hour OH = Wb*Lo $39.25 $20.86 $12.44

Fully Loaded Hourly

Rate Wf = Wb + OH

= W + B + OH $117.74 $62.58 $37.33

1. Data Source: BLS ht tp://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_325300.htm May 2012 data

NAICS 325300

- Pesticide, Fertilizer, and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing

Standard Occupational Codes:

Management: 11

- 0000, Management Occupations

Te chnical: 19

- 0000, Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations

Clerical: 43

- 0000, Office and Administrative Support Occupations

2. Fringe benefits/wage per hour.

3. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Air Pollution Con trol Cost Manual, Sixth

Edition , EPA

- 452

- 02

- 001, January 2002, pg. 2

- 34. The loading for indirect costs is within the

range of 20

- 70% of the load labor rate (wage + benefits) suggested in EPA guidance.Work Sheets used to Calculate EPA and Federal Go vernment Labor Costs

This attachment is available as part of the electronic docket EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2013

- 0493 and is

part of the ICR’s Supporting Statement

NAICS: 999100

Federal Executive Branch

Labor Category: Formula Managerial Technical Clerical

Unloaded Hourly Rate 1 = W $55.66 $36.11 $20.59

Benefits Percentage 2 Lb = B/W 44% 44% 44%

Benefits per hour B = W*Lb $24.74 $16.05 $9.15

Loaded Hourly Rate Wb = W + B =

W(1+Lb) $80.40 $52.16 $29.74

Overhead Percentage 3 Lo = OH/Wb 50% 50% 50%

Overhead per hour OH = Wb*Lo $40.20 $26.08 $14.87

Fully Loaded Hourly

Rate Wf = Wb + OH

= W + B + OH $120.60 $78.24 $44.61

1. Data Source: BLS http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_999100.h tm May 2012 data

NAICS 999100

- Federal Executive Branch

Standard Occupational Codes:

Management: 11

- 0000, Management Occupations

Technical: 19

- 0000, Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations

Cleric al: 43

- 0000, Office and Administrative Support Occupations

2. Fringe benefits/wage per hour.

3. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth

Edition , EPA

- 452

- 02

- 001, January 2002, pg. 2

- 34. The loading for indirect costs is within the

range of 20

- 70% of the load labor rate (wage + benefits) suggested in EPA guidance.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 443

Expressing the sense of Congress supporting the 2002 World Basketball

Championship and welcoming the 16 national teams competing.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 17, 2002

Ms. CARSON of Indiana (for herself, Mr. VISCLOSKY, Mr. PENCE, Mr. ROEMER, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. BUYER, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. KERNS,

Mr. HOSTETTLER, and Mr. HILL) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress supporting the 2002 World

Basketball Championship and welcoming the 16 national

teams competing.

Whereas the 2002 World Basketball Championship will be

held from August 29, 2002, through September 8, 2002,

in Indianapolis, Indiana;

Whereas 2002 marks the first time in the 50 year history of

the World Basketball Championship it will be held in the

United States;

Whereas 16 national teams will be competing as part of the

62 game, 11 day event;

Whereas the 2002 World Basketball Championship is expected to draw between 150,000 and 175,000 basketball
2

•HCON 443 IH

fans from throughout the United States and foreign nations; and

Whereas international sporting events such as the 2002

World Basketball Championship play an important role

in continuing to foster positive international relationships

and friendships between participating teams and fans:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) supports the 2002 World Basketball Cham4 pionship to be held in Indianapolis, Indiana; and

5 (2) welcomes the participating teams from Al6 geria, Angola, Argentina, Brazil, Canada, China,

7 Germany, Lebanon, New Zealand, Puerto Rico, Rus8 sia, Spain, Turkey, Venezuela, and Yugoslavia.

Æ