alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 28, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 28, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A25I0011. PI KAPPA PHI FRATERNITY et al v. BLAINE N. MORRIS.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

22A044796
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 12790-001]

On January 18, 2012, Office of Energy Projects staff held a technical meeting in Woodbury, CT. The meeting was transcribed by a court reporter; however, due to various processing delays, the transcript was not added to the public record for the Pomperaug Hydro Project (FERC No. 12790) until March 21, 2012. Because the transcript for the technical meeting was not available to the public until after the expiration of the comment period established in the Commission's January 12, 2012, notice, the deadline for filing comments is extended to April 13, 2012.

                    Comments may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​efiling.asp.*                     Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system at                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​ecomment.asp.*                     You must include your name and contact information at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support. Although the Commission strongly encourages electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file, mail an original and seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.                

                    If you have questions, please contact Steve Kartalia at (202) 502-6131, or via email at                     *stephen.kartalia@ferc.gov.*

Dated: March 29, 2012.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-8155 Filed 4-4-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Vivid Learning Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Matthew J. Hammer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and,





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Matthew J. HammerName:
              Matthew J. HammerTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: February 13, 2008
Exhibit 32.1**POLYPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.****CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polypore International, Inc. (the“Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Robert B. Toth, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Date: November 14, 2006          /s/ Robert B. Toth     Robert B. Toth    President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Onex Falcon Direct Lending BDC Fund (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

1. the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2. the information contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: March 16, 2023



|    |                        
|--- | -----------------------
|    |                        
|By: | /s/ Edward U. Gilpin   
|    | Edward U. Gilpin       
|    | Chief Financial Officer









---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report ofDesign Source, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Peter Reichard, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated this 13th day of February, 2007.



| | PETER REICHARD                                     
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Peter Reichard                                     
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer













---
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 347 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 347

   Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Peace 
                      Officers' Memorial Service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2002

 Mr. LaTourette (for himself and Mr. Costello) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Peace 
                      Officers' Memorial Service.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL PEACE OFFICERS' MEMORIAL 
              SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--The National Fraternal Order of Police and its 
auxiliary (in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') shall be 
permitted to sponsor a public event, the 21st annual National Peace 
Officers' Memorial Service (in this resolution jointly referred to as 
the ``event''), on the Capitol Grounds, in order to honor the law 
enforcement officers who died in the line of duty during 2001.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on May 15, 2002, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and 
equipment, as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946 (40 
U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, advertisements, displays, 
and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions 
applicable to the Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2
                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Lee R. Schlesinger, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form 10-Q of  Naugatuck  Valley
Financial Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
      disclosure  controls and procedures to be designed under our  supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,  including
      its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
      entities,  particularly  during the  period in which this  report is being
      prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions  about  the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,  as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c)  disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
      control over  financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,  or is reasonably
      likely to  materially  affect,  the  registrant's  internal  control  over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all  significant  deficiencies  and material  weakness in the design or
      operation  of  internal   control  over  financial   reporting  which  are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2005


By: /s/ Lee R. Schlesinger
    -----------------------------
    Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)


                                       19
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00560

- CV

Nueces County Civil Service Commission v. Richard Morrisey

On Appeal from the 347th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2015

- DCV

- 5630

- H

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, hav ing considered this cause on appeal, vacates any and all judgments rendered by the trial court subsequent to the expiration of its plenary power and dismisses the case

. The Court orders the judgment s
VAC ATED and the case DISMISSED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against the appellant.
We further order t his decision certified below for observance. April 30, 2020
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Glenn R. Cole, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                   |  |  | 
|Dated: May 9, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ GLENN R. COLE
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Name:             |  | Glenn R. Cole                                    
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Title:            |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-10122 Conference Calendar

JONATHAN MARSHALL, SR., (Joe), Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; STATE OF TEXAS; 256TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, Family Court; U.S. ATTORNEY, Department of Justice; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; U.S. DISTRICT COURT, Northern District of Texas; CHARLES R. FULBRUGE, III, Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit; STATE APPELLATE COURT, Fifth District at Dallas; JIM BOWLES, Sheriff of Dallas County; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:99-CV-1733-P

-------------------- August 23, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jonathan Marshall, Sr., Texas prisoner # 96032321, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in the appeal of the dismissal of his civil rights complaint. The district court certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that Marshall’sNo. 00-10122 -2- appeal was not taken in good faith. Marshall’s motion for IFP is treated as a challenge to the district court’s certification.
See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Because Marshall fails to show that he will raise a meritorious issue on appeal, his motion to proceed IFP is DENIED. Marshall has abandoned the argument that the district court’s dismissal of his complaint for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), was an abuse of discretion by failing to brief it. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Even had he briefed the argument, it is without merit. The district court did not err in certifying that an appeal would be frivolous. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous.
See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); Baugh , 117 F.3d at 202 n.24 (5th Cir. 1997); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The dismissal of this appeal counts as Marshall’s second strike for purposes of § 1915(g). See Marshall v. United States , No. 98-10056 (5th Cir. July 24, 1998); see also Adepegba v.
Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Marshall is WARNED that if he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).
IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING
ISSUED.
EXHIBIT 32
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Naugatuck   Valley  Financial
Corporation (the "Company") (in organization) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"),  I, John C. Roman,  President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company,  and I, Lee R. Schlesinger,  Vice President and Treasurer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Bank.


/s/ John C. Roman
-----------------
John C. Roman
President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Lee R. Schlesinger
----------------------
Lee R. Schlesinger
Vice President and Treasurer


Date:  September 27, 2004
Tower One Wireless Corp.: Exhibit 4.2 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com


    

    Tower One Wireless Corp. ("Tower One Wireless") 

    Loan ITAU - Phase 1


    Year ended December 31, 2021

    Background: 

    Loan Agreement 

    	Effective date:


    March 11, 2021

    	Maturity date:


    September 17, 2030

    	Parties:


    Fideicomiso Tower, Tower 3 S.A.S. ("Tower"), Commerk S.A.S. ("Commerk") and Itaú Corpbanca Colombia S.A. ("Itaú").

    	Terms:


    Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, Fideicomiso Tower (the "debtor"), Tower and Commerk (together, the "codebtors"), and Itaú (the "lender"), establish a Loan Agreement, pursuant to which Itaú will lend funds for the purpose of constructing cellphone Towers. The loan amount is for up to COP 31,632,000,000.00 (USD 7.9MM). Commerk, is committed to disburse up to COP 10,544,000,000.00 (USD 2.7MM) ("Commerk disbursement").

    	Interest rate: 


    4.615% + IBR (six months)

    	Interest payment: 


    Quarterly

    	Grace period:


    12 months (only for principal)

    	Principal payment: 


    Quarterly based on a gradient.

    	Project:


    This financing will be used to execute the construction of up to 220 towers assigned by WOM and Telefónica in Colombia. The total amount of the project is COP 42,176,000,000.00 (USD 10.6MM).

    	Functionality:


    Disbursements will occur after a set of towers are constructed and accepted by WOM or Telefónica.

    The disbursed amount will be calculated based on the free cash flow that each set of towers will generate, granting a DSCR of at least 1.1x.

    The disbursed amount will not exceed the ratio 75/25 (Debt/Commerk disbursement).

    	Collateral:


    A trust has been put in place (Fideicomiso Tower). The economic rights related to the financed towers are being transferred to the trust and the towers are being pledged.

    	Termination: The agreement will be finished once all the amounts owed and related to it are being satisfied. The loan can be prepaid at any time, this prepayment will not have any cost if happens in an interest payment date.
	Applicable Law: Colombia.