alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

OF THE STATE OF TEXAS 

NO. _________ 

JAIRO UMANZOR 

Appellant, 

 On Appeal from the 

V. 228TH District Court of 

Harris County, Texas; 

Trial Cause Number 1349385

THE STATE OF TEXAS 

PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE 

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW 

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT: 

 JAIRO UMANZOR, Petitioner in the above cause number, would respectfully 

request this Court to grant his motion to extend the time to file his petition for 

discretionary review. In support of said motion, Mr. Umanzor would show unto the 

Court the following: 

I.

This appeal lies from Mr. Umanzor’s conviction in The State of Texas v. Jairo 

Umanzor, Cause Number 1349385 in the 228th District Court of Harris County, Texas. 

Mr. Umanzor was charged by indictment with murder. Mr. Umanzor was convicted 

by a jury and sentenced by the jury to fifteen (15) years in the Institutional Division of 

the Department of Criminal Justice. Mr. Umanzor’s conviction was affirmed on 

PD-0403-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 4/9/2015 11:01:38 AM

Accepted 4/15/2015 2:46:17 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
March 26, 2015, by the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 14-13-00958-CR. 

Mr. Umanzor’s Petition for Discretionary Review is due April 27, 2015. This is Mr. 

Umanzor’s first request for an extension to file the petition for discretionary review.

II.

Mr. Umanzor’s attorney of record, Daucie Schindler, is requesting an extension 

of time in order to further evaluate the complex issues involved in the case. An 

extension of time is necessary so that the petition for discretionary review can be 

timely filed and undersigned counsel can properly consult with Mr. Umanzor. This 

motion is not made for the purpose of delay. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that this 

Honorable Court will grant this requested extension of time to file the Appellant's 

Petition for Discretionary Review in the above cause for thirty days and extend the 

time for filing the petition until May 27, 2015.
Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Bunin

Chief Public Defender

/s/ Daucie Schindler

Daucie Schindler

State Bar No. 24013495

Harris County 

Public Defender’s Office

Assistant Public Defender

1201 Franklin 13th Floor

Houston, Texas 77002

Daucie.Schindler@pdo.hctx.net

Tel: 713-368-0016

Fax: 713-368-9278

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing instrument was this day 

electronically served on counsel for the State and by mailing same to the following 

parties on this the 9

th day of April, 2015:

Ms. Abbie Miles

Harris County District Attorney's Office

Appellate Division

1201 Franklin, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002

State Prosecuting Attorney

P.O. Box 12405

Austin, Texas 78711

/s/ Daucie Schindler

Daucie Schindler
Exhibit 31.1








I, Susan B. Sheffield, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-2  (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Citibank, N.A.








By:/s/ Susan B. SheffieldName:Susan B. SheffieldTitle:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:March 4, 2024
EXHIBIT 32


                   STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
                               GOLD KIST INC.
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gold Kist Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 1, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John Bekkers, President and Chief Executive Officer, and principal executive
officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted
pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ John Bekkers
John Bekkers
President and Chief Executive Officer
February 15, 2005



                                 EXHIBIT 32


                   STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                               GOLD KIST INC.
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gold Kist Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 1, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stephen O. West, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, and principal
financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as
adopted pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Stephen O. West
Stephen O. West
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President
February 15, 2005
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 21, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00846-CR

GARY WAYNE FLIM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1361607

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On May 2, 2013, we dismissed appellant’s attempted appeal in this case for 

lack of jurisdiction. Flim v. State, 14-13-00220-CR, 2013 WL 1867600 (Tex. 

App.—Houston [14th Dist.] May 2, 2013, no pet.) (not designated for publication). 

Appellant has filed another notice of appeal in this trial court cause number from 

the trial court’s failure to grant him permission to appeal. 
2

Only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over matters 

related to post-conviction relief from a final felony conviction. See Ater v. Eighth 

Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. 1991); see also Tex. Code Crim. 

Proc. Ann. art. 11.07; Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of 

Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (holding 

that article11.07 provides the exclusive means to challenge a final felony 

conviction).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, McCally, and Donovan.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self-Employed Decreasing Non-Filers Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, May 15, 2012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patricia Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self-Employed Decreasing Non-Filers Project Committee will be held Tuesday, May 15, 2012, at 1 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Ms. Patricia Robb. For more information please contact Ms. Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP Office, Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: March 28, 2012.

Louis Morizio,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2012-8414 Filed 4-6-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of True North Energy Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Massimiliano Pozzoni, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respect, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/
                Massimiliano PozzoniName:Massimiliano
                PozzoniTitle:     Principal
                Financial OfficerDate:March
                11, 2008
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 13, 2023

No. 04

- 23

- 00028

- CR

IN RE Juan Antonio Belmares CENICEROS

Original Mandamus Proceeding

ORDER

Sitting: R e beca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Ju stice

Beth Watkins, Justice

On January 12, 2023

, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a n emergency

motion to stay pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus. This court believes

a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires furt her

consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b). R espondent and real part y in interest may file a

response to the petition in this court no later than February 2, 20 23. Any such response must

conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.

Relator’s emergency motion for temporary stay i s GRANTED IN PART as follows:

1. All pretrial settings requiring relator’s in

- person appearance are STAYED

pending further order from this court. Pretrial settings that do not require relator’s

in

- person appearance may proceed

.

2. The January 23, 2023 trial setting is STAYED pending further order from this

court.

It is so ORDERED on January 13, 2023

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Liang Zhang, Chief Executive
      Officer of Synutra International, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his
      knowledge, that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months
      ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
                November 10,
                2008/s/
                Liang ZhangName:
                Liang ZhangTitle: Chief Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished with the Company’s Report pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is
      not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
      made
      before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
      language in such filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

                    The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate called the optional “peg” rate (13 CFR 120.214) on a quarterly basis. This rate is a weighted average cost of money to the government for maturities similar to the average SBA direct loan. This rate may be used as a base rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. This rate will be 2.250 (2                     1/4                    ) percent for the April-June quarter of FY 2012.                

Pursuant to 13 CFR 120.921(b), the maximum legal interest rate for any third party lender's commercial loan which funds any portion of the cost of a 504 project (see 13 CFR 120.801) shall be 6% over the New York Prime rate or, if that exceeds the maximum interest rate permitted by the constitution or laws of a given State, the maximum interest rate will be the rate permitted by the constitution or laws of the given State.

Grady B. Hedgespeth,

Director, Office of Financial Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2012-8012 Filed 4-3-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DARIN JONES,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF

AMERICA,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 13-15177

D.C. No. 2:10-cv-02769-RCB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Robert C. Broomfield, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2015** 

Before: GOODWIN, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. 

Alaska state prisoner Darin Jones appeals pro se from the district court’s

summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various constitutional

violations by Corrections Corporation of America (“CCA”). We have jurisdiction

FILED

APR 28 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051,

1056 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Jones’s failure to

protect claims because, even assuming that a constitutional deprivation occurred,

Jones failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether any

constitutional deprivation resulted from an official policy, practice, or custom of

CCA. See Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 690-91 (1978) (explaining

that an entity acting under color of state law may be sued only where the action

that is alleged to be unconstitutional implements or executes a policy statement,

ordinance, regulation, or decision officially adopted and promulgated by that

body’s officers, or if the deprivations are pursuant to governmental custom); see

also Tsao v. Desert Palace, Inc., 698 F.3d 1128, 1139 (9th Cir. 2012) (“[W]e see

no basis in the reasoning underlying Monell to distinguish between municipalities

and private entities acting under color of state law.”). 

We do not consider Jones’s argument regarding amendment of his complaint

because he raised this argument for the first time on appeal. See Greger v.

Barnhart, 464 F.3d 968, 973 (9th Cir. 2006) (holding that a new issue raised on

appeal was waived by counseled plaintiff’s failure to raise it before the district

court). 

2 13-15177
We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009)

(per curiam). 

AFFIRMED.

3 13-15177
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ALLEN NEAL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 98 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of September, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 435 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 435

  Expressing the sense of the Congress that the therapeutic technique 
 known as rebirthing is a dangerous and harmful practice and should be 
                              prohibited.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2002

 Mrs. Myrick submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress that the therapeutic technique 
 known as rebirthing is a dangerous and harmful practice and should be 
                              prohibited.

Whereas ``rebirthing'' is a form of ``attachment therapy'', which is used to try 
        to forge new bonds between adoptive parents and their adopted children;
Whereas Candace Newmaker, a child from North Carolina, died from the rebirthing 
        technique, and four other children have died from other forms of 
        attachment therapy;
Whereas the American Psychological Association does not recognize rebirthing as 
        proper treatment; and
Whereas many States have enacted or are considering legislation to prohibit this 
        technique: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This concurrent resolution may be cited as the ``Candace Newmaker 
Resolution of 2002''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING THERAPEUTIC TECHNIQUE KNOWN AS 
              REBIRTHING.

    (a) In General.--It is the sense of the Congress that the 
therapeutic technique known as rebirthing is dangerous and harmful, and 
the Congress encourages each State to enact a law that prohibits such 
technique.
    (b) Definition.--In this resolution, the term ``rebirthing'' means 
a therapy to reenact the birthing process in a manner that includes 
restraint and creates a situation in which a patient may suffer 
physical injury or death.
                                 <all>
```