Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d and is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 50740 Su m m ar yC al endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. JU A N C A R R E O N G U E R R E R O , al so kn ow n as Jua n C arreon -G u e rrero, al so know n as Juan C a reo n , al soknow n as Juan M endez , al soknow n as Juan M el i n dez, al so kn ow n a s J u an C arreon, al so kn ow n as Jua n G u errer o, al so know n as Juan C . G uer r er o, al so know n as R obe r t o M ar t i nez, al soknow n as Jose P erez, al so kn ow n as Jua n C arrean G u errer o, al so kn ow n as Jua n C arreon G , al so kn ow n as Jua n D e D i os C arreon-G u errer o, al so kn ow n as Jua n G u errer o Car r e o n , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or th e W est ernD i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 1: 09- C R
- 41- 1 B e fo r e W IE N E R , D e M O S S , a n dS O U T H W IC K , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R IA M: * Jua n Car r e o n Guer r e r o ( Car r e o n) a ppe al s t he s e nt e nc e i m po s e d f o l l o w i ng h i s gui l t y pl ea conv i ct i on f or bei n g u n l aw f

u l l y prese n ti n t h e U n i t ed S t ates f ol l ow i n g rem oval. C arreon argu es t h at h is se n t en ce of 60 m on t h s of United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D May 4, 2010 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk Case: 09-50740 Document: 00511099770 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/04/2010N o. 09- 50740

2 im p r is o n m e n t, a n u p w a r dv a r ia n c e th r e e m o n th s g r e a te rt h a n t h e to p e n do f h is gui deli n es sent enc e r ange, w as unre as onabl e b ec ause i tw as gr eat ert han n ecess ary t o ef

fect u ate th e g oal s of

1 8 U . S . C . § 355 3( a) . C arreon ack n ow l edg es th a t t h e d is tr ic t c o u r t c o n s id e r e dp r o p e rs e n te n c in gfa c to r s infa s h io n in gh is s e n te n c e , b u t h e a s s e r ts th a t t h e d is tr ic t c o u r t im p r o p e r lyfa ile dto co n s id e rh is l i kely nee d f

orr ehabil i t at i on. H e m ai n tain s t hathi s hi st or y o f s exual m i sc onductr ef

l ec t ed a m ent a lorem ot i onali ss ue and t hatt he s ent enc e w as u n r e a s o n a b l e b e c a u s e i td i dn o tr e q u i r e d i a g n o s i s o rt r e a t me n tf o rh i m. A tsentenci n g, the d i st ri ctcourtexpl ai n ed that itbased the sentence u pon t h e § 3 5 5 3 (a ) fa c t o r s o f t h e n a t u r e a n dc ir c u m s t a n c e s o f t h e o ffe n s e , C a r r e o n ’s persona lhi st ory an d c h aract eri st i cs, an d t h e n eed t o protec t t h e pu bl i c. I tnoted C arreon’ s l on g cri m i n alh i st ory, the l ew d n ature of C arreon’ s previ ou s of fen ses, and t hatC ar r eo n h a d m a n y p r i orc onvi c t i ons t hatdi d notr es ul ti n addi t i onal crim i n a lh i storypo i n ts. W h i l e C a rreo n arg u es th a t t h e d i stri ct cou rt fa i l e d to t ak e i n t o consi derati on hi s needf or m en t alor e m o tiona lt reat m en t , C arreon a v e r r e da t r e a r r a ig n m e n t t h a t h e d i d n o th a v e m e n ta l p r o b le m s th a t w o u ld i n t erf ere w i t h h i s u n derst an di n g of t h e proceedi n gs, an d nothi n g i n t h e rec ord i ndi c at es t hata l es se rs ent enc e w oul d have al l ow ed Carr eo n t o r ec eive m ent al o re m o t i o nalt r e at m e ntt hathe w o ul d notre c e ive w hi l e i nc ar c e r at e d. G ive n t he sm a l lex ten t of

the va ri a n c e , C a rreo n ’ s cri m i n a lh i storyan dpr op en sity to com m i tcr i m es of

a sexua lna t u re, an d the defer en ce given t o di st ri ctcourt de t e r m i nat i o ns r e ga r di ng § 3 55 3( a) fac t o r s , C arreon has no ts ho w n t hatt he s e n te n c e c o n s tit u te d a n a b u s e o f d is c r e tio n . S ee G allv. Un i t ed S t ate s , 5 52 U . S. 3 8 , 5 1 (2 0 0 7 ); Un itedS ta tes v. S m ith , 4 4 0 F .3d 7 0 4 , 7 0 8 -1 0 (5t h C ir. 2 0 0 6 ). A F F IR M E D . Case: 09-50740 Document: 00511099770 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/04/2010