# Официален вестник C 243/2007

| | ISSN 1830-365X |
| --- | --- |
| Официален вестник
  на Европейския съюз | C 243 |
| | |
| Издание на български език | Информация и известия | Година 5017 октомври 2007 г. |

ISSN 1830-365X

Официален вестник

на Европейския съюз

C 243

Издание на български език

Информация и известия

Година 5017 октомври 2007 г.

---

| Известие No | Съдържание | Страница |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Известия |
| | ИЗВЕСТИЯ ОТ ИНСТИТУЦИИТЕ И ОРГАНИТЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗ |
| | Комисия |
| 2007/C 243/01 | Непротивопоставяне на нотифицирана концентрация (Дело COMP/M.4748 — T-Mobile/Orange) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Известие No

Съдържание

Страница

II   Известия

ИЗВЕСТИЯ ОТ ИНСТИТУЦИИТЕ И ОРГАНИТЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗ

Комисия

2007/C 243/01

Непротивопоставяне на нотифицирана концентрация (Дело COMP/M.4748 — T-Mobile/Orange) (
  1
  )

1

1

| | IV   Информация |
| --- | --- |
| | ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОТ ИНСТИТУЦИИТЕ И ОРГАНИТЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗ |
| | Комисия |
| 2007/C 243/02 | Обменен курс на еурото | 2 |

IV   Информация

ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОТ ИНСТИТУЦИИТЕ И ОРГАНИТЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗ

Комисия

2007/C 243/02

Обменен курс на еурото

2

| | V   Обявления |
| --- | --- |
| | АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ |
| | Европейска служба за подбор на персонал (EPSO) |
| 2007/C 243/03 | Обявление за открит конкурс EPSO/AST/43-44/07 | 3 |
| | ПРОЦЕДУРИ ОТНОСНО ИЗПЪЛНЕНИЕТО НА ПОЛИТИКАТА НА КОНКУРЕНЦИЯ |
| | Комисия |
| 2007/C 243/04 | Държавна помощ — Обединено кралство — Държавна помощ С 23/07 (ex N 118/07) — Vauxhall Motors Ltd — Помощ за обучение за Ellesmere Port — Покана за представяне на мнения съгласно член 88, параграф 2 от Договора за ЕО (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| | ДРУГИ АКТОВЕ |
| | Комисия |
| 2007/C 243/05 | Публикация на заявление по член 6, параграф 2 от Регламент (ЕО) No 510/2006 на Съвета относно закрилата на географски указания и наименования за произход на земеделски продукти и храни | 11 |

V   Обявления

АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ

Европейска служба за подбор на персонал (EPSO)

2007/C 243/03

Обявление за открит конкурс EPSO/AST/43-44/07

3

ПРОЦЕДУРИ ОТНОСНО ИЗПЪЛНЕНИЕТО НА ПОЛИТИКАТА НА КОНКУРЕНЦИЯ

Комисия

2007/C 243/04

Държавна помощ — Обединено кралство — Държавна помощ С 23/07 (ex N 118/07) — Vauxhall Motors Ltd — Помощ за обучение за Ellesmere Port — Покана за представяне на мнения съгласно член 88, параграф 2 от Договора за ЕО (
  1
  )

1

4

ДРУГИ АКТОВЕ

Комисия

2007/C 243/05

Публикация на заявление по член 6, параграф 2 от Регламент (ЕО) No 510/2006 на Съвета относно закрилата на географски указания и наименования за произход на земеделски продукти и храни

11

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Текст от значение за ЕИП |

---

(1)   Текст от значение за ЕИП

1

| BG | |
| --- | --- |

BG

---

II Известия

ИЗВЕСТИЯ ОТ ИНСТИТУЦИИТЕ И ОРГАНИТЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗ

Комисия

| 17.10.2007 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | C 243/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2007

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

C 243/1

---

Непротивопоставяне на нотифицирана концентрация

(Дело COMP/M.4748 — T-Mobile/Orange)

(текст от значение за ЕИП)

(2007/C 243/01)

На 20 август 2007 г. Комисията реши да не се противопоставя на горепосочената нотифицирана концентрация и да я обяви за съвместима с общия пазар. Решението се основава на член 6, параграф 1, буква б) от Регламент (ЕО) No 139/2004 на Съвета. Пълният текст на решението е достъпен само на Английски и ще се публикува, след като бъдат премахнати всички професионални тайни, които могат да се съдържат в него. Той ще бъде достъпен:

| — | на страницата, посветена на конкуренцията, на уебсайта Europa (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). Този сайт предоставя различни средства за подпомагане на достъпа до решения за отделни сливания, включително индекси за търсене по дружество, по номер на делото, по дата и по отрасъл, |
| --- | --- |

—

на страницата, посветена на конкуренцията, на уебсайта Europa (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). Този сайт предоставя различни средства за подпомагане на достъпа до решения за отделни сливания, включително индекси за търсене по дружество, по номер на делото, по дата и по отрасъл,

| — | в електронен формат на уебсайта EUR-Lex под номер 32007M4748. EUR-Lex предоставя онлайн достъп до европейското право (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

в електронен формат на уебсайта EUR-Lex под номер 32007M4748. EUR-Lex предоставя онлайн достъп до европейското право (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---

IV Информация

ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОТ ИНСТИТУЦИИТЕ И ОРГАНИТЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗ

Комисия

| 17.10.2007 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | C 243/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2007

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

C 243/2

---

Обменен курс на еурото (1)

16 октомври 2007 г.

(2007/C 243/02)

1 еуро=

| | Валута | Обменен курс |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | щатски долар | 1,4150 |
| JPY | японска йена | 165,17 |
| DKK | датска крона | 7,4528 |
| GBP | лира стерлинг | 0,69650 |
| SEK | шведска крона | 9,1538 |
| CHF | швейцарски франк | 1,6753 |
| ISK | исландска крона | 86,25 |
| NOK | норвежка крона | 7,6660 |
| BGN | български лев | 1,9558 |
| CYP | кипърска лира | 0,5842 |
| CZK | чешка крона | 27,526 |
| EEK | естонска крона | 15,6466 |
| HUF | унгарски форинт | 251,05 |
| LTL | литовски лит | 3,4528 |
| LVL | латвийски лат | 0,7030 |
| MTL | малтийска лира | 0,4293 |
| PLN | полска злота | 3,7196 |
| RON | румънска лея | 3,3513 |
| SKK | словашка крона | 33,687 |
| TRY | турска лира | 1,7314 |
| AUD | австралийски долар | 1,5929 |
| CAD | канадски долар | 1,3878 |
| HKD | хонконгски долар | 10,9724 |
| NZD | новозеландски долар | 1,8930 |
| SGD | сингапурски долар | 2,0767 |
| KRW | южнокорейски вон | 1 297,84 |
| ZAR | южноафрикански ранд | 9,7399 |
| CNY | китайски юан рен-мин-би | 10,6380 |
| HRK | хърватска куна | 7,3235 |
| IDR | индонезийска рупия | 12 819,90 |
| MYR | малайзийски рингит | 4,7862 |
| PHP | филипинско песо | 62,755 |
| RUB | руска рубла | 35,3050 |
| THB | тайландски бат | 44,424 |

Валута

Обменен курс

USD

щатски долар

1,4150

JPY

японска йена

165,17

DKK

датска крона

7,4528

GBP

лира стерлинг

0,69650

SEK

шведска крона

9,1538

CHF

швейцарски франк

1,6753

ISK

исландска крона

86,25

NOK

норвежка крона

7,6660

BGN

български лев

1,9558

CYP

кипърска лира

0,5842

CZK

чешка крона

27,526

EEK

естонска крона

15,6466

HUF

унгарски форинт

251,05

LTL

литовски лит

3,4528

LVL

латвийски лат

0,7030

MTL

малтийска лира

0,4293

PLN

полска злота

3,7196

RON

румънска лея

3,3513

SKK

словашка крона

33,687

TRY

турска лира

1,7314

AUD

австралийски долар

1,5929

CAD

канадски долар

1,3878

HKD

хонконгски долар

10,9724

NZD

новозеландски долар

1,8930

SGD

сингапурски долар

2,0767

KRW

южнокорейски вон

1 297,84

ZAR

южноафрикански ранд

9,7399

CNY

китайски юан рен-мин-би

10,6380

HRK

хърватска куна

7,3235

IDR

индонезийска рупия

12 819,90

MYR

малайзийски рингит

4,7862

PHP

филипинско песо

62,755

RUB

руска рубла

35,3050

THB

тайландски бат

44,424

---

(1)

Източник: референтен обменен курс, публикуван от Европейската централна банка.

---

V Обявления

АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ

Европейска служба за подбор на персонал (EPSO)

| 17.10.2007 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | C 243/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2007

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

C 243/3

---

ОБЯВЛЕНИЕ ЗА ОТКРИТ КОНКУРС EPSO/AST/43-44/07

(2007/C 243/03)

Европейската служба за подбор на персонал (EPSO) организира следните общи конкурси: EPSO/AST/43/07 и EPSO/AST/44/07 — Асистенти (AST3) за лица с българско и румънско гражданство в следните области:

| 1. | Европейска публична администрация |
| --- | --- |

1.

Европейска публична администрация

| 2. | Финансово управление |
| --- | --- |

2.

Финансово управление

Обявлението за конкурса е публикувано единствено на немски, английски и френски език в Официален вестник серия С 243 A от 17 октомври 2007 г.

Подробна информация, можете да намерите на интернет страницата на EPSO: http://europa.eu/epso

---

ПРОЦЕДУРИ ОТНОСНО ИЗПЪЛНЕНИЕТО НА ПОЛИТИКАТА НА КОНКУРЕНЦИЯ

Комисия

| 17.10.2007 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | C 243/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2007

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

C 243/4

---

ДЪРЖАВНА ПОМОЩ — ОБЕДИНЕНО КРАЛСТВО

Държавна помощ С 23/07 (ex N 118/07) — Vauxhall Motors Ltd — Помощ за обучение за Ellesmere Port

Покана за представяне на мнения съгласно член 88, параграф 2 от Договора за ЕО

(текст от значение за ЕИП)

(2007/C 243/04)

С писмо от 10 юли 2007 г., възпроизведено на езика, чийто текст е автентичен, на страниците след това резюме, Комисията уведоми Обединеното кралство за решението си да открие процедурата, предвидена в член 88, параграф 2 от Договора за ЕО, относно част от посочената по-горе помощ.

Заинтересованите страни могат да представят мненията си относно помощта, по отношение на която Комисията открива процедурата, в срок от един месец от датата на публикуване на това резюме и на писмото, което следва, на следния адрес:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| State aid registry |
| SPA-3 6/5 |
| B-1049 Brussels |
| Факс (32-2) 296 12 42 |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

State aid registry

SPA-3 6/5

B-1049 Brussels

Факс (32-2) 296 12 42

Тези мнения ще бъдат предадени на Обединеното кралство. Запазването в тайна на самоличността на заинтересованата страна, която представя мнението, може да бъде поискано писмено, като се посочат причините за искането.

РЕЗЮМЕ

На 5 март 2007 г. Обединеното кралство уведоми Комисията за намерението си да предостави помощ на Vauxhall Motors Ltd, Ellesmere Port („Vauxhall“), завод за производство на автомобили, който е поделение на Vauxhall Motors Ltd и част от General Motors Ltd. Уведомлението бе направено съгласно член 5 от Регламент (ЕО) No 68/2001 на Комисията относно помощта за обучение, според който за всяка помощ за обучение в размер на над 1 милион EUR трябва да се подаде отделно уведомление.

Целта на помощта е да подкрепи програма за обучение, предназначена за подобряване на качеството на работата на Vauxhall. Предвидено е обучението да се проведе в продължение на шест години (от 2007 до 2012 г. включително). Общият размер на приемливите разходи за обучението възлиза на 16 583 461 GBP. Помощта ще се предостави от North-West Development Agency като преки субсидии в размер на 8 584 767 GBP, които ще бъдат изплатени на шест годишни вноски.

Комисията смята, че мярката представлява държавна помощ по смисъла на член 87 от Договора за ЕО. Комисията ще оцени съвместимостта на помощта с общия пазар въз основа на член 87, параграф 3, буква в) от Договора за ЕО. При оценяването Комисията ще вземе под внимание насочващите принципи от Регламента за помощта за обучение. Комисията ще оцени и това дали помощта осигурява необходим стимул за обучението, т.е. дали обучението не би било проведено и при липса на помощта. Този критерий за „стимулиращ ефект“ е общо условие за съвместимост на държавната помощ.

На този етап Комисията изпитва съмнения относно съвместимостта на помощта поради следните причини. Първо, тя поставя под въпрос стимулиращия ефект на помощта по отношение на три части на програмата за обучение (обучението по производствени системи, обучението по глобалната производствена система на GM и програмите за работа/обучение за студенти), за които Комисията смята, че вероятно ще бъдат осъществени и при липса на помощ.

Второ, Комисията поставя под въпрос становището на Обединеното кралство, че обучението, което трябва да се проведе в четири области на програмата (обучение по производствени системи, по глобалната производствена система, по промяна на културата и по оптимизиране на производството (lean manufacturing)), представлява общо обучение по смисъла на Регламента за помощта за обучение, т.е. обучение, което осигурява квалификация, която може да се използва в други предприятия или сектори, и за което може да се предоставя помощ в размер на до 50 % от приемливите разходи. Комисията смята, че тези части на обучението представляват специфично обучение по смисъла на регламента (максимален интензитет на помощта от 25 %).

ТЕКСТ НА ПИСМОТО

„The Commission wishes to inform the United Kingdom that, having examined the information supplied by the UK authorities on the measure referred to above, it has decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty.

1.   THE PROCEDURE

| (1) | By letter dated 28 February 2007, registered with the Commission on 6 March 2007, the UK authorities notified the Commission of the above-mentioned measure for General Motor's Vauxhall assembly plant at Ellesmere Port. The Commission requested complementary information by letter of 4 April 2007 (ref. D/51586), to which the UK authorities replied on 22 May 2007. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By letter dated 28 February 2007, registered with the Commission on 6 March 2007, the UK authorities notified the Commission of the above-mentioned measure for General Motor's Vauxhall assembly plant at Ellesmere Port. The Commission requested complementary information by letter of 4 April 2007 (ref. D/51586), to which the UK authorities replied on 22 May 2007.

2.   DESCRIPTION OF THE AID

2.1.   The beneficiary

| (2) | The aid recipient is Vauxhall Motors Ltd, Ellesmere Port, UK (“Vauxhall”), a car manufacturing plant which is an operating unit of Vauxhall Motors Ltd and part of General Motors Inc. (“GM”). It manufactures cars from the Opel model range (which are sold in the UK under the Vauxhall badge), currently the Astra which will terminate in 2009. Vauxhall is located in Ellesmere Port in Cheshire in the North-West region of England (1) and employs close to 2 200 workers. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The aid recipient is Vauxhall Motors Ltd, Ellesmere Port, UK (“Vauxhall”), a car manufacturing plant which is an operating unit of Vauxhall Motors Ltd and part of General Motors Inc. (“GM”). It manufactures cars from the Opel model range (which are sold in the UK under the Vauxhall badge), currently the Astra which will terminate in 2009. Vauxhall is located in Ellesmere Port in Cheshire in the North-West region of England (1) and employs close to 2 200 workers.

| (3) | Vauxhall has suffered from a long record of underperformance. Initiatives taken since 2002 have considerably improved the plant's performance. However, according to the UK, the improvements represent only the changes needed to meet the basic standards for a GM plant. In order to survive in the long term, Vauxhall needs to implement a more comprehensive change and staff development programme in order to improve productivity and build quality and make Vauxhall a class leading plant. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Vauxhall has suffered from a long record of underperformance. Initiatives taken since 2002 have considerably improved the plant's performance. However, according to the UK, the improvements represent only the changes needed to meet the basic standards for a GM plant. In order to survive in the long term, Vauxhall needs to implement a more comprehensive change and staff development programme in order to improve productivity and build quality and make Vauxhall a class leading plant.

| (4) | On 17 April 2007, GM announced that Vauxhall was amongst the European GM sites that had been selected to produce the Global Compact Vehicle, the model that will replace the Astra. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

On 17 April 2007, GM announced that Vauxhall was amongst the European GM sites that had been selected to produce the Global Compact Vehicle, the model that will replace the Astra.

2.2.   The training programme

| (5) | Vauxhall intends to implement a wide-ranging training plan which breaks down into 8 individual training areas, 6 of which are considered by the UK to be eligible for training aid:






  (a) | Production System Training: This concerns training in all elements of Vauxhall's production and quality control systems. The objective is to give staff a better understanding of the build process and thus generate better standard, reduce defects and improve problem solving. |
| --- | --- | --- |

(5)

Vauxhall intends to implement a wide-ranging training plan which breaks down into 8 individual training areas, 6 of which are considered by the UK to be eligible for training aid:

(a)

Production System Training: This concerns training in all elements of Vauxhall's production and quality control systems. The objective is to give staff a better understanding of the build process and thus generate better standard, reduce defects and improve problem solving.

| (b) | Integrated Training Plan: This part of the training concerns the implementation of the “Global Manufacturing System” (GMS) which incorporates best practices and technologies into a common manufacturing system for GM operations. Through a series of objectives (“People Involvement”, “Standardisation”, “Built-in Quality”, “Short Lead Time”, “Continuous Improvement”) the training will allow the staff of Vauxhall to build future generations of cars in a better way. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Integrated Training Plan: This part of the training concerns the implementation of the “Global Manufacturing System” (GMS) which incorporates best practices and technologies into a common manufacturing system for GM operations. Through a series of objectives (“People Involvement”, “Standardisation”, “Built-in Quality”, “Short Lead Time”, “Continuous Improvement”) the training will allow the staff of Vauxhall to build future generations of cars in a better way.

| (c) | Cultural Change: The objective of this training is to instil a sense of common purpose and collective responsibility in the workforce and to create a team culture based on excellence in production. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

Cultural Change: The objective of this training is to instil a sense of common purpose and collective responsibility in the workforce and to create a team culture based on excellence in production.

| (d) | Dual Skilling: The purpose of this training is to develop a flexible workforce by allowing staff with a primary skill in mechanical engineering to develop electrical skills and, conversely, those with primary skills in electrical engineering to acquire mechanical skills. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

Dual Skilling: The purpose of this training is to develop a flexible workforce by allowing staff with a primary skill in mechanical engineering to develop electrical skills and, conversely, those with primary skills in electrical engineering to acquire mechanical skills.

| (e) | Lean Manufacturing: This is a project to ensure that the principles and techniques of lean manufacturing are embedded in the workforce and that employees are fully aware of the benefits of applying these to the manufacturing process at Vauxhall. A central part of training under this heading will be the secondment of staff to another GM plant outside the UK. |
| --- | --- |

(e)

Lean Manufacturing: This is a project to ensure that the principles and techniques of lean manufacturing are embedded in the workforce and that employees are fully aware of the benefits of applying these to the manufacturing process at Vauxhall. A central part of training under this heading will be the secondment of staff to another GM plant outside the UK.

| (f) | Undergraduates: This is a programme whereby Vauxhall organises 12-month courses for young University students. The various programmes (e.g. “Body Planning Engineer”, “Finance Analyst”, “General Assembly Planning Engineer”) combine learning and work experience under the supervision of a mentor. There is no contractual obligation on either party to maintain the working relationship at the end of the training. |
| --- | --- |

(f)

Undergraduates: This is a programme whereby Vauxhall organises 12-month courses for young University students. The various programmes (e.g. “Body Planning Engineer”, “Finance Analyst”, “General Assembly Planning Engineer”) combine learning and work experience under the supervision of a mentor. There is no contractual obligation on either party to maintain the working relationship at the end of the training.

| (6) | Outside the training intended to benefit from the notified State aid are the training areas “Apprentices” (an apprenticeship scheme for young people), “Model Change” (the training needed to adapt to the production of the Global Model Vehicle) and activities related to “Training & Performance Appraisal”. In addition, the UK authorities have informed the Commission that Vauxhall undertakes “routine training” in the skills necessary to the plant's normal operations. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

Outside the training intended to benefit from the notified State aid are the training areas “Apprentices” (an apprenticeship scheme for young people), “Model Change” (the training needed to adapt to the production of the Global Model Vehicle) and activities related to “Training & Performance Appraisal”. In addition, the UK authorities have informed the Commission that Vauxhall undertakes “routine training” in the skills necessary to the plant's normal operations.

| (7) | According to the information provided by the UK, the training would consist mainly in general training, with some elements of specific training (2). The training plan will be implemented over six years (2007 to 2012 included) and will concern all employees at Vauxhall. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

According to the information provided by the UK, the training would consist mainly in general training, with some elements of specific training (2). The training plan will be implemented over six years (2007 to 2012 included) and will concern all employees at Vauxhall.

2.3.   The aid

| (8) | The aid would be given in the form of a direct grant of GBP 8 584 767 payable in six yearly instalments over the running time of the training programme. The aid would be implemented as an individual aid from the North West Development Agency. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

The aid would be given in the form of a direct grant of GBP 8 584 767 payable in six yearly instalments over the running time of the training programme. The aid would be implemented as an individual aid from the North West Development Agency.

| (9) | According to the information provided by the UK, the eligible costs for the training and the aid break down as follows (the costs for the projects “Apprenticeships”, “Model Change” and “Routine Training Budget” are not considered eligible by the UK) (3)
   (4):











  Projects | General training Eligible costs in GBP | Specific training Eligible costs in GBP | Wage compensation in GBP | Total eligible costs in GBP | Aid in GBP | Intensity in % |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Product System Training | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] |
| Integrated Training Progr. | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] |
| Cultural Change | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] |
| Dual Skilling | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] |
| Lean Manufacturing | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] |
| Undergraduates | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] |
| TOTAL | 9 870 316 | 464 808 | 6 248 338 | 16 583 461 | 8 584 767 | 51,78 |
| Apprenticeships | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] |
| Model Changes | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] |
| Routine Training Budge | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] |

(9)

According to the information provided by the UK, the eligible costs for the training and the aid break down as follows (the costs for the projects “Apprenticeships”, “Model Change” and “Routine Training Budget” are not considered eligible by the UK) (3)
   (4):

Projects

General training Eligible costs in GBP

Specific training Eligible costs in GBP

Wage compensation in GBP

Total eligible costs in GBP

Aid in GBP

Intensity in %

Product System Training

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

Integrated Training Progr.

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

Cultural Change

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

Dual Skilling

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

Lean Manufacturing

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

Undergraduates

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

TOTAL

9 870 316

464 808

6 248 338

16 583 461

8 584 767

51,78

Apprenticeships

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

Model Changes

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

Routine Training Budge

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

[...]

| (10) | According to the UK, the planned aid amounts respect the aid intensities of the Training Aid Regulation, i.e. 50 % for general training and 25 % for specific training, with an increase of 3,7 percentage points for training to disadvantaged workers within the meaning of Article 2(g) of the Training Aid Regulation (5). |
| --- | --- |

(10)

According to the UK, the planned aid amounts respect the aid intensities of the Training Aid Regulation, i.e. 50 % for general training and 25 % for specific training, with an increase of 3,7 percentage points for training to disadvantaged workers within the meaning of Article 2(g) of the Training Aid Regulation (5).

3.   ASSESSMENT

3.1.   Qualification as State aid

| (11) | According to Article 87 of the EC Treaty, any aid granted by a Member State or through State resources in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods, in so far as it affects trade between Member States, constitutes incompatible State aid unless it can be justified under Article 87(2) or (3) of the EC Treaty. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

According to Article 87 of the EC Treaty, any aid granted by a Member State or through State resources in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods, in so far as it affects trade between Member States, constitutes incompatible State aid unless it can be justified under Article 87(2) or (3) of the EC Treaty.

| (12) | The Commission considers that the measure constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty. The funding takes the form of a grant from the general budget of the North West region, and is thus funded from State resources. The measures are selective as they are limited to Vauxhall. They are likely to distort competition within the Community since, by relieving it of a significant part of the costs of the training, the measure will provide Vauxhall with an advantage over other competitors not receiving the aid. Finally, the market for motor vehicles is characterised by extensive trade between Member States. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

The Commission considers that the measure constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty. The funding takes the form of a grant from the general budget of the North West region, and is thus funded from State resources. The measures are selective as they are limited to Vauxhall. They are likely to distort competition within the Community since, by relieving it of a significant part of the costs of the training, the measure will provide Vauxhall with an advantage over other competitors not receiving the aid. Finally, the market for motor vehicles is characterised by extensive trade between Member States.

3.2.   Legal basis for the assessment

| (13) | The UK authorities have notified the aid as individual aid under Article 5 of the Training Aid Regulation which provides that when the amount of aid granted to one enterprise for a single training project exceeds EUR 1 million, the aid is not exempted from the notification requirement of Article 88(3) EC Treaty. The Commission notes that the proposed aid in this case amounts to GBP 8 584 767, i.e. about EUR 13 million, to be paid to one enterprise, and that the training project is a single project. The Commission therefore considers that the notification requirement applies to the proposed aid, and that it has been respected by the UK. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

The UK authorities have notified the aid as individual aid under Article 5 of the Training Aid Regulation which provides that when the amount of aid granted to one enterprise for a single training project exceeds EUR 1 million, the aid is not exempted from the notification requirement of Article 88(3) EC Treaty. The Commission notes that the proposed aid in this case amounts to GBP 8 584 767, i.e. about EUR 13 million, to be paid to one enterprise, and that the training project is a single project. The Commission therefore considers that the notification requirement applies to the proposed aid, and that it has been respected by the UK.

| (14) | When assessing an individual training aid which does not qualify for the exemption laid down in the Training Aid Regulation, the Commission will, in line with previous decisions (6) make an individual assessment of the aid on the basis of Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty. However, for the purposes of this individual assessment the Commission will by analogy rely on the guiding principles of the Training Aid Regulation and in particular the exemption criteria laid down in its Article 4. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

When assessing an individual training aid which does not qualify for the exemption laid down in the Training Aid Regulation, the Commission will, in line with previous decisions (6) make an individual assessment of the aid on the basis of Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty. However, for the purposes of this individual assessment the Commission will by analogy rely on the guiding principles of the Training Aid Regulation and in particular the exemption criteria laid down in its Article 4.

| (15) | Moreover, the Commission will, in line with its established practice, assess whether the training aid measure is necessary to undertake the training in question. The necessity of the aid is a general condition for finding the aid compatible with the common market (7). If the aid does not lead to additional training, it cannot be considered to “promote” the economic development within the meaning of Article 87(3)(c) EC of the EC Treaty nor to correct the market imperfections that lead companies to underinvest in the training, as mentioned in recital 10 of the Training Aid Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

Moreover, the Commission will, in line with its established practice, assess whether the training aid measure is necessary to undertake the training in question. The necessity of the aid is a general condition for finding the aid compatible with the common market (7). If the aid does not lead to additional training, it cannot be considered to “promote” the economic development within the meaning of Article 87(3)(c) EC of the EC Treaty nor to correct the market imperfections that lead companies to underinvest in the training, as mentioned in recital 10 of the Training Aid Regulation.

3.3.   Compatibility with the common market

| (16) | In view of the information submitted by the UK, the Commission has doubts on the compatibility of the aid with the common market for the reasons indicated below. |
| --- | --- |

(16)

In view of the information submitted by the UK, the Commission has doubts on the compatibility of the aid with the common market for the reasons indicated below.

3.3.1.   Incentive effect of the aid

| (17) | As indicated above, the Commission takes the view that training aid can be compatible with the common market only if it creates a necessary incentive for the funded training, in the absence of which the training would not take place. Training which is part of the normal operations of an undertaking and for which market forces alone should provide sufficient incentive will not qualify for training aid. |
| --- | --- |

(17)

As indicated above, the Commission takes the view that training aid can be compatible with the common market only if it creates a necessary incentive for the funded training, in the absence of which the training would not take place. Training which is part of the normal operations of an undertaking and for which market forces alone should provide sufficient incentive will not qualify for training aid.

| (18) | The UK has indicated that all training which is necessary for Vauxhall's normal operations is provided as part of “routine training”, the cost of which is not included in the eligible costs of the notified aid (the same is claimed for the training necessary to adapt to the production of the Global Concept Vehicle, covered by the heading “Model Change”). |
| --- | --- |

(18)

The UK has indicated that all training which is necessary for Vauxhall's normal operations is provided as part of “routine training”, the cost of which is not included in the eligible costs of the notified aid (the same is claimed for the training necessary to adapt to the production of the Global Concept Vehicle, covered by the heading “Model Change”).

| (19) | According to the UK, the training covered by the notification is significantly in excess of the work required to maintain its current business and would, because of it prohibitive cost, not be undertaken by Vauxhall without the aid. The aid would thus be a necessary condition for the training. |
| --- | --- |

(19)

According to the UK, the training covered by the notification is significantly in excess of the work required to maintain its current business and would, because of it prohibitive cost, not be undertaken by Vauxhall without the aid. The aid would thus be a necessary condition for the training.

| (20) | The Commission nevertheless doubts the incentive effect of the aid on parts of the training programme: |
| --- | --- |

(20)

The Commission nevertheless doubts the incentive effect of the aid on parts of the training programme:

Production System Training

| (21) | In the Commission's view, this training appears to be necessary to ensure Vauxhall's normal operations. This should provide Vauxhall with sufficient incentive to undertake the training without aid. |
| --- | --- |

(21)

In the Commission's view, this training appears to be necessary to ensure Vauxhall's normal operations. This should provide Vauxhall with sufficient incentive to undertake the training without aid.

| (22) | The UK has indicated that the training in production systems which is indispensable to Vauxhall's operations is provided through “routine training” which is distinct from the Production System Training. However, the UK has not provided sufficient information to allow the Commission to verify the contents of the “routine training” and to compare it to the Production System Training to satisfy itself that the latter provides additional qualifications. |
| --- | --- |

(22)

The UK has indicated that the training in production systems which is indispensable to Vauxhall's operations is provided through “routine training” which is distinct from the Production System Training. However, the UK has not provided sufficient information to allow the Commission to verify the contents of the “routine training” and to compare it to the Production System Training to satisfy itself that the latter provides additional qualifications.

| (23) | The Commission consequently doubts that the aid is necessary for Vauxhall to undertake the Production System Training. |
| --- | --- |

(23)

The Commission consequently doubts that the aid is necessary for Vauxhall to undertake the Production System Training.

| (24) | Concerning a particular item of the Production System Training, namely lines A25.1.1 to A25.1.6 “Statutory Inspection Training”, the Commission observes that any training which is required by statute will necessarily be undertaken even in the absence of State aid. The Commission would require specific explanations regarding this point. |
| --- | --- |

(24)

Concerning a particular item of the Production System Training, namely lines A25.1.1 to A25.1.6 “Statutory Inspection Training”, the Commission observes that any training which is required by statute will necessarily be undertaken even in the absence of State aid. The Commission would require specific explanations regarding this point.

Integrated Training Plan

| (25) | The Commission understands that GMS is an integrated manufacturing system which has been developed by GM and which is common to all GM car manufacturing facilities. Training the workforce in GMS would therefore appear indispensable to Vauxhall's normal operations and should be undertaken even in the absence of the notified State aid. |
| --- | --- |

(25)

The Commission understands that GMS is an integrated manufacturing system which has been developed by GM and which is common to all GM car manufacturing facilities. Training the workforce in GMS would therefore appear indispensable to Vauxhall's normal operations and should be undertaken even in the absence of the notified State aid.

| (26) | The UK has indicated that GMS training has been undertaken at Vauxhall before, but that the Integrated Training Plan aims at the refreshment and extension of the skills initially learnt and that this expenditure is discretionary and would not be brought about by the simple operation of market forces. |
| --- | --- |

(26)

The UK has indicated that GMS training has been undertaken at Vauxhall before, but that the Integrated Training Plan aims at the refreshment and extension of the skills initially learnt and that this expenditure is discretionary and would not be brought about by the simple operation of market forces.

| (27) | However, the Commission considers that training in the manufacturing systems applied at Vauxhall, including appropriate refreshment courses, are essential to operations. The Commission considers that the UK authorities have failed to provide concrete information to substantiate the claim that the Integrated Training Plan goes beyond what it is necessary for Vauxhall's normal operations and would not be undertaken in the absence of the aid. The Commission consequently doubts that the notified aid, in this respect, is compatible with the common market. |
| --- | --- |

(27)

However, the Commission considers that training in the manufacturing systems applied at Vauxhall, including appropriate refreshment courses, are essential to operations. The Commission considers that the UK authorities have failed to provide concrete information to substantiate the claim that the Integrated Training Plan goes beyond what it is necessary for Vauxhall's normal operations and would not be undertaken in the absence of the aid. The Commission consequently doubts that the notified aid, in this respect, is compatible with the common market.

Undergraduates

| (28) | The UK has indicated that the programme is nonessential to Vauxhall's operations and could be curtailed without business unduly suffering. The costs of the training cannot be considered part of operating costs. Expenditure on the Undergraduate programme is discretionary and up for review every year. It is liable to budget cuts. The State aid would guarantee its continuation. |
| --- | --- |

(28)

The UK has indicated that the programme is nonessential to Vauxhall's operations and could be curtailed without business unduly suffering. The costs of the training cannot be considered part of operating costs. Expenditure on the Undergraduate programme is discretionary and up for review every year. It is liable to budget cuts. The State aid would guarantee its continuation.

| (29) | At this stage, the Commission observes that the Undergraduate programme has been in place for a number of years without State aid, which would indicate that the aid is not necessary for this training. The UK, which has stated that the Undergraduate training brings new talent into the company and is a key element of the training to be undertaken by Vauxhall, has not provided any concrete evidence that the programme will be discontinued in the absence of aid. The Commission is consequently not satisfied that the aid is compatible with the common market in this respect. |
| --- | --- |

(29)

At this stage, the Commission observes that the Undergraduate programme has been in place for a number of years without State aid, which would indicate that the aid is not necessary for this training. The UK, which has stated that the Undergraduate training brings new talent into the company and is a key element of the training to be undertaken by Vauxhall, has not provided any concrete evidence that the programme will be discontinued in the absence of aid. The Commission is consequently not satisfied that the aid is compatible with the common market in this respect.

3.3.2.   The distinction between general and specific training

| (30) | The notions of general and specific training are defined in Article 2(e) of the Training Aid Regulation. Specific training is directly and principally applicable to the employee's present or future position in the assisted undertaking and provides qualifications which are not or only to a limited extent transferable to other firms or fields of work. General training, on the other hand, provides qualifications which are transferable to other firms or fields of work and therefore substantially improve the employability of the employee. The essential distinction between the two forms of training is thus the transferability of the acquired skills. |
| --- | --- |

(30)

The notions of general and specific training are defined in Article 2(e) of the Training Aid Regulation. Specific training is directly and principally applicable to the employee's present or future position in the assisted undertaking and provides qualifications which are not or only to a limited extent transferable to other firms or fields of work. General training, on the other hand, provides qualifications which are transferable to other firms or fields of work and therefore substantially improve the employability of the employee. The essential distinction between the two forms of training is thus the transferability of the acquired skills.

| (31) | For the different parts of the Vauxhall training programme the UK authorities have indicated whether they consider the training to be general or specific (and, consequently, which maximum aid intensity should apply in accordance with Article 4 of the Training Aid Regulation). The Commission nevertheless questions the UK's qualifications as regards the following training projects: |
| --- | --- |

(31)

For the different parts of the Vauxhall training programme the UK authorities have indicated whether they consider the training to be general or specific (and, consequently, which maximum aid intensity should apply in accordance with Article 4 of the Training Aid Regulation). The Commission nevertheless questions the UK's qualifications as regards the following training projects:

Production System Training

| (32) | As indicated above, this training concerns all manufacturing and quality control systems at Vauxhall. The UK has indicated that all training will be given by external trainers and concerns third party equipment which is used in other undertakings and sectors, thus providing trainees with transferable qualifications. |
| --- | --- |

(32)

As indicated above, this training concerns all manufacturing and quality control systems at Vauxhall. The UK has indicated that all training will be given by external trainers and concerns third party equipment which is used in other undertakings and sectors, thus providing trainees with transferable qualifications.

| (33) | The Commission nevertheless considers that the UK has not provided it with sufficient information to allow it to ensure that all training provided under this heading is indeed transferable. The UK would need to provide the Commission with details on the basic “routine” training at Vauxhall so that the Commission can compare the nature of this training and assess to which extent it concerns skills which are specific to Vauxhall or GM. |
| --- | --- |

(33)

The Commission nevertheless considers that the UK has not provided it with sufficient information to allow it to ensure that all training provided under this heading is indeed transferable. The UK would need to provide the Commission with details on the basic “routine” training at Vauxhall so that the Commission can compare the nature of this training and assess to which extent it concerns skills which are specific to Vauxhall or GM.

Integrated Production System

| (34) | As indicated above, this is, to the Commission's understanding, training in the Global Manufacturing System which was developed by GM and is applied at GM facilities. |
| --- | --- |

(34)

As indicated above, this is, to the Commission's understanding, training in the Global Manufacturing System which was developed by GM and is applied at GM facilities.

| (35) | The UK argues that GMS is based on a set of principles applicable to any business situation which involves a regular process. The underlying principles are applied both within and outside the automotive sector. The employees would thus acquire a set of skills which will make them capable of performing more efficiently with any employer. In addition, some specific elements of training have been identified and notified as specific training. |
| --- | --- |

(35)

The UK argues that GMS is based on a set of principles applicable to any business situation which involves a regular process. The underlying principles are applied both within and outside the automotive sector. The employees would thus acquire a set of skills which will make them capable of performing more efficiently with any employer. In addition, some specific elements of training have been identified and notified as specific training.

| (36) | The Commission nevertheless questions whether training into a proprietary manufacturing system can be considered to provide transferable qualifications. Although certain underlying notions may be widely shared, the Commission considers that the training, insofar as it concerns the application of these notions to a concrete production process, is likely to be specific. The Commission would therefore require more detailed information on this training and how closely linked it is to practical applications in the GM manufacturing process. |
| --- | --- |

(36)

The Commission nevertheless questions whether training into a proprietary manufacturing system can be considered to provide transferable qualifications. Although certain underlying notions may be widely shared, the Commission considers that the training, insofar as it concerns the application of these notions to a concrete production process, is likely to be specific. The Commission would therefore require more detailed information on this training and how closely linked it is to practical applications in the GM manufacturing process.

Cultural Change

| (37) | The Commission notes that the UK authorities have not submitted any details on the content and expected output of the training under this heading as, on their own account, this information is not yet available. In spite of this, the UK authorities claim that all training provided under this heading is general training within the meaning of the Training Aid Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(37)

The Commission notes that the UK authorities have not submitted any details on the content and expected output of the training under this heading as, on their own account, this information is not yet available. In spite of this, the UK authorities claim that all training provided under this heading is general training within the meaning of the Training Aid Regulation.

| (38) | However, the Commission has doubts about the transferability of skills acquired as part of a “cultural change” which — in the words of the UK authorities — is specifically focused on “jointly improving the key production metrics of the plant relating to cost and quality”. In view of this objective and the notification's statements that “individual cultures widely vary between different organisations” and that “there is no optimal culture which can be easily and quickly adopted” the Commission doubts that this part of the training programme provides skills which are transferable by individual employees to other firms or fields of work. The Commission consequently doubts that training fitting the description given by the UK authorities constitutes general training. |
| --- | --- |

(38)

However, the Commission has doubts about the transferability of skills acquired as part of a “cultural change” which — in the words of the UK authorities — is specifically focused on “jointly improving the key production metrics of the plant relating to cost and quality”. In view of this objective and the notification's statements that “individual cultures widely vary between different organisations” and that “there is no optimal culture which can be easily and quickly adopted” the Commission doubts that this part of the training programme provides skills which are transferable by individual employees to other firms or fields of work. The Commission consequently doubts that training fitting the description given by the UK authorities constitutes general training.

Lean Manufacturing

| (39) | The UK has argued that the principles of lean manufacturing are generally applied across the manufacturing industry and that, once acquired by the trainee, provide qualifications which are widely transferable. |
| --- | --- |

(39)

The UK has argued that the principles of lean manufacturing are generally applied across the manufacturing industry and that, once acquired by the trainee, provide qualifications which are widely transferable.

| (40) | Although the notion of lean manufacturing may rest on a body of generally applicable principles and techniques, the Commission nevertheless doubts whether this training can be dissociated from its practical application at Vauxhall or within the GM group at large, and thus whether the qualifications it provides are largely transferable by individual employees to other firms or fields of work. The Commission consequently doubts that this constitutes general training (8). |
| --- | --- |

(40)

Although the notion of lean manufacturing may rest on a body of generally applicable principles and techniques, the Commission nevertheless doubts whether this training can be dissociated from its practical application at Vauxhall or within the GM group at large, and thus whether the qualifications it provides are largely transferable by individual employees to other firms or fields of work. The Commission consequently doubts that this constitutes general training (8).

4.   CONCLUSION

In the light of the foregoing considerations, the Commission, acting under the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty, requests the United Kingdom to submit its comments and to provide all such information as may help to assess the aid, within one month of the date of receipt of this letter.

It requests your authorities to forward a copy of this letter to the potential recipient of the aid immediately.

The Commission wishes to remind the United Kingdom that Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty has suspensory effect, and would draw your attention to Article 14 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999, which provides that all unlawful aid may be recovered from the recipient.

The Commission warns the United Kingdom that it will inform interested parties by publishing this letter and a meaningful summary of it in the Official Journal of the European Union. It will also inform the EFTA Surveillance Authority by sending a copy of this letter. All such interested parties will be invited to submit their comments within one month of the date of such publication.“

---

(1)  Vauxhall is located in an area which until 31 December 2006 qualified for regional aid under Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty. Since 1 January 2007, the region is an unassisted area.

1

(2)  The notions of general and specific training are used as defined in Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid (OJ L 10, 13.1.2001, p. 20), referred to in this decision as “the Training Aid Regulation”.

2

(3)  These amounts in the table are those indicated in the UK's letter of 22 May 2007. However, the Commission notes a discrepancy as regards the figures provided in the notification, at least as concerns the eligible costs for the Integrated Training Programme. The Commission expects the UK authorities to clarify this issue and provide definitive amounts for the eligible costs and the aid.

3

(4)  [...]: Confidential information.

4

(5)  At present, 37 % of workers of the company are considered to be disadvantaged. They fall mainly into the category of persons older than 45 who have not attained an upper secondary education. However, as the training will run over 6 years and as the exact number of disadvantaged workers benefiting from the training will be known only at the time the training is delivered, the UK authorities intend to apply a general increase of aid intensity of 3,7 % across the board. The UK authorities have committed to verifying the actual number of disadvantaged workers in each training project ex post and to correct the applied aid intensities accordingly.

5

(6)  See Commission Decision 2006/938/EC of 4 July 2006 on State aid C 40/2005 ... Ford Genk (OJ C 366, 21.12.2006, p. 32) and Commission Decision of 4 April 2007 on State aid C 14/06 ... General Motors Belgium, not yet published. This follows also from paragraph 16 of the preamble of the Training Aid Regulation.

6

(7)  This is reiterated in point 11 of the Regulation which clarifies that it must be “ensure[d] that State aid is limited to the minimum necessary to obtain the Community objective which market forces alone would not make possible [...]”.

7

ensure[d] that State aid is limited to the minimum necessary to obtain the Community objective which market forces alone would not make possible [...]”

(8)  The Commission points out that in the above-mentioned decision in Ford Genk, training on “Lean organisation” was considered to be specific training.

8

Ford Genk

---

ДРУГИ АКТОВЕ

Комисия

| 17.10.2007 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | C 243/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2007

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

C 243/11

---

Публикация на заявление по член 6, параграф 2 от Регламент (ЕО) No 510/2006 на Съвета относно закрилата на географски указания и наименования за произход на земеделски продукти и храни

(2007/C 243/05)

Тази публикация предоставя право на възражение срещу заявлението в съответствие с член 7 от Регламент (ЕО) No 510/2006 на Съвета (1) . Декларациите за възражение трябва да бъдат получени от Комисията в срок от шест месеца от датата на тази публикация.

РЕЗЮМЕ

РЕГЛАМЕНТ (ЕО) No 510/2006 НА СЪВЕТА

„CHAMOMILLA BOHEMICA“

ЕО No: CZ/PDO/005/0411/28.10.2004

ЗНП ( Х ) ЗГУ ( )

Това резюме представя с информационна цел основните елементи на спецификацията на продукта.

1.   Отговорен отдел в държавата-членка:

| Наименование: | Úřad průmyslového vlastnictví |
| --- | --- |
| Адрес: | Antonína Čermáka 2a |
| CZ-160 68 Praha 6 |

Наименование:

Úřad průmyslového vlastnictví

Адрес:

Antonína Čermáka 2a

CZ-160 68 Praha 6

Тел.

(420) 220 383 111

Факс

(420) 224 324 718

Ел. адрес:

posta@upv.cz

2.   Група:

| Наименование: | LEROS, s.r.o., zastupující skupinu producentů |
| --- | --- |
| Адрес: | U Národní galerie 470 |
| CZ-150 00 Praha 5-Zbraslav |

Наименование:

LEROS, s.r.o., zastupující skupinu producentů

Адрес:

U Národní galerie 470

CZ-150 00 Praha 5-Zbraslav

Тел.

(420) 257 898 111

Факс

(420) 257 921 328

Ел. адрес:

leros@leros.cz

Състав:

производители/преработватели ( Х ) други: ( )

3.   Вид продукт:

Клас 1.8: Други продукти от приложение I

4.   Спецификация:

(резюме на изискванията по член 4, параграф 2 от Регламент (ЕО) No 510/2006)

4.1   Наименование: „Chamomilla Bohemica“.

„Chamomilla Bohemica“ е традиционното наименование на цвета от истинската лайка, която се среща в Бохемия (Република Чехия).

4.2   Описание: Изсушен цвят от истинска лайка (flos Chamomilla vulgaris) — Matricariae flos, Matricaria recutita (L.) Rauschert, Chamomilla recutita (L.) Rauschert.

„Chamomilla Bohemica“ се отличава със съдържанието си на етерично масло (до 1 %), чиято основна активна съставка е хамазуленът, съдържащ се в количество от 0,06 до 0,07 %. Благодарение на характеристиките си „Chamomilla Bohemica“ е с качество, превъзхождащо това на растенията в други географски области и отговаря в широка степен на критериите, които са установени през 1997 г. и 2002 г. от чешката фармакопеа за цвета от истинска лайка. Според допълнението от 2004 г. на изданието на чешката фармакология от 2002 г. тя съдържа „най-малко 4 ml етерично масло със син цвят на килограм сухо вещество и най-малко 0,25 % общо апигенин-7-глюкозид, изчислен на базата на сухо вещество. Основните съставки на етеричното масло са сесквитерпените (около 50 % от етеричното масло), (-)-алфа-бизаболол, окис на бизаболол А, окис на бизаболол Б, окис на (-)-бизаболол А). Етеричното масло съдържа също хамазулен (минимално количество): 0,035 %). Освен етеричното масло „Chamomilla Bohemica“ съдържа кумарини (умбелиферон, херниарин), флавоноиди (апигенин-7-глюкозид и неговите производни, лутеолин, кверцетин, изорамнетин), чието минимално съдържание е 0,01 %, както и азулени (в минимално количество). 0,02 %). Флавоноидите (0,015 %) имат спазмолитично действие. Спироетерите (0,03 %) имат антибактериално и антигъбично действие.“ При хроматография върху тънък слой, от „Chamomilla Bohemica“ не трябва да се отделя етерично масло с кафяв цвят и средното съдържание на хамазулена трябва да е между 0,06 et 0,07 %. Тя се продава под формата на билка за чай в отделни пакетчета или в насипно състояние в опаковки от по 50 грама, или на едро — в чували по 14 kg.

4.3   Географска област: Бохемия, т.е. районите Прага, централна Бохемия, южна Бохемия, Plzeň, Karlovy Vary, Ústí nad Labem, Liberec, Hradec Králové, Pardubice, както и, за района Vysočina, окръзите Havlíčkův Brod, Jihlava и Pelhřimov, съгласно основен закон No 347/1997 относно организацията на големите териториални единици, за изменение на основен закон No 1/1993 на чешкия национале съвет, конституцията на Република Чехия в актуалната ѝ версия.

За местата на отглеждане на „Chamomilla Bohemica“ на територията на Бохемия са характерни следните климатични и почвени условия: глинести и пясъчни почви (според почвената класификация: черноземна почва, кафяви и излужени почви), чиято стойност на pH е между 7,3 и 8,1; климатични условия: годишните валежи достигат до 500-700 mm/m2; височина между 230 и 480 m.

4.4   Доказателство за произход: Преработвателните предприятия водят регистър на доставчиците, които са подложени на проверка на всеки етап от процеса на добиване на цвета на лайката, по-конкретно засаждането, растежа, събирането, сушенето, междинното съхраняване и преработването. Те имат също така и регистър на купувачите на готови продукти.

Местната отговорна служба на националната инспекция по земеделието и хранителните продукти следи за спазването на спецификацията.

4.5   Метод на производство: Лайката има голям капацитет на приспособяване, но веществата, които съдържа, са много чувствителни на обкръжаващите я условия; затова е важно да се съблюдават следните етапи:

Подготовка на почвата: лайката не е капризна култура и изисква средно дълбока оран на почвата, брануване и обезплевена почва.

Засаждане: използване на прецизни съоръжения за засяване, утъпкване на почвата след засяване, 20 g семена за посев на ар.

Растеж: през този период се тори с комплексни индустриални торове (напр. NPK или Cererit).

Събиране и обработка след това: цветовете се събират на ръка или с помощта на специални машини марка Neset и Unag непосредствено след разтварянето на чашката; сушат се при препоръчителна максимална температура от 40 °С, след това се обработват на конвейри със сортиращи и разделящи ситеми.

За да се запази типичният характер на суровината, описан в точка 4.2, е от голямо значение културата да идва от определената географска област.

Съхраняване и опаковане: продуктът се съхранява на сухо и добре проветриво място, защитено от светлина, преди да бъде опакован в хартиени чували с еднакъв вид съдържание, върху които се поставя етикетът; не е необходимо тези операции, включително и последното му опаковане, да се извършват в определената географска област, но те трябва да се изпълняват съгласно действащите норми и правила.

4.6   Връзка: Чешките области и преди са произвеждали лайка с отлично качество, но необходимостта от установяване на разлика между останалите производства на лайка и тази култура, довела до по-честото използване на наименованието „Chamomilla Bohemica“, се наложи от петдесетте години насам, когато се увеличи чуждестранното търсене. От този момент насам, „Chamomilla Bohemica“ вече означава лайка с точно определени свойства (вж. точка 4.2), придадени ѝ от естествените условия на околната среда. Тази особеност се дължи на съчетаването на няколко култивационни фактора, като например климата, почвата и начините на бране (средно равнище на валежите: от 500 до 700 mm/m2, pH на почвата: между 7,3 и 8,1, вид почва: глинест и песъчлив). Добивите зависят изключително от избора на почва, както и от количеството на валежите. Надморската височина и излагането на слънце са два фактора, които също силно влияят върху съдържанието на етерично масло и хамазулен. Качественият продукт, „Chamomilla Bohemica“ е представяна на различни панаири и изложения като „SALIMA“ и „Země živitelka“, където е печелила отличието „качествен продукт“. Марките „Neset“ и „Unag“ си служат със специални пособия за бране на цветните главички, без да нараняват останалата част от растението.

В Чешката република наименованието за произход „Chamomilla Bohemica“ е регистрирано от 21 януари 1975 г. под номер 84 и е също така защитено в рамките на двустранно споразумение с Португалия.

4.7   Инспекционен орган:

| Наименование: | Státní zemědělská a potravinářská inspekce — inspektorát v Praze |
| --- | --- |
| Адрес: | Za opravnou 4 |
| CZ-150 00 Praha 5 |

Наименование:

Státní zemědělská a potravinářská inspekce — inspektorát v Praze

Адрес:

Za opravnou 4

CZ-150 00 Praha 5

Тел.

(420) 257 199 511

Факс

(420) 257 199 529

Ел. адрес:

praha@szpi.gov.cz

и местните служби на националната инспекция в областите на производство и преработване.

4.8   Етикетиране: Наименованието „Chamomilla Bohemica“ трябва да бъде написано четливо (с главни букви) на предната страна на опаковката.

---

(1)  OВ L 93, 31.3.2006 г., стp. 12.

---