alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 265 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 265

   Expressing appreciation to Turkey for offering to provide special 
            forces in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 7, 2001

   Mr. Wynn submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing appreciation to Turkey for offering to provide special 
            forces in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.

Whereas Turkey has offered to provide special forces in support of Operation 
        Enduring Freedom;
Whereas as the member nation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization located 
        closest to Afghanistan, Turkey is the first Muslim country to offer 
        direct military participation in Operation Enduring Freedom; and
Whereas through this offer Turkey has demonstrated itself to be a staunch ally 
        and friend of the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress expresses its appreciation to Turkey for offering to 
provide special forces in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.
                                 <all>
```
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 57

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Condemning the heinous atrocities that occurred on

March 5, 2001, at Santana High School in Santee, California.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 57

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas on March 5, 2001, a gunman opened fire at

Santana High School in Santee, California, killing 2 students and wounding 13 others: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—
2

•HCON 57 EH

1 (1) condemns, in the strongest possible terms,

2 the atrocities that occurred on March 5, 2001, at

3 Santana High School in Santee, California;

4 (2) offers its deepest condolences to the fami5 lies, friends, and loved ones of those killed in the

6 shooting;

7 (3) expresses hope for the rapid and complete

8 recovery of those wounded in the shooting;

9 (4) applauds the hard work and dedication ex10 hibited by local and State law enforcement officials

11 and by others who offered support and assistance;

12 (5) commends the rapid response by the faculty

13 and staff of Santana High School in evacuating its

14 students to safety in an efficient and effective man15 ner;

16 (6) encourages communities to implement a

17 wide range of violence prevention services for the

18 Nation’s youth; and
3

•HCON 57 EH

1 (7) encourages the people of the United States

2 to engage in a national dialogue on preventing

3 school violence.

Passed the House of Representatives March 13,

2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Unistone Acquisition
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,
2005 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I James Z. Li, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ James Z. Li                                     Dated: November 14, 2005
    -----------------------------
    James Z. Li
    Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)
1

Ogulei, David

From: Reed, Michael <Michael.Reed@Illinois.gov>

Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 1:58 PM

To: Damico, Genevieve; Ogulei, David; Marcus, Danny

Cc: Pilapil, Ray; Armitage, Julie

Subject: Veolia Renewal Permit (aka Onyx)

All, 

I did a cursory review of the Preliminary draft provided to IEPA and do not have any comments at this time. 

Provided there are no revisions of interest to the State between now and the start of Public Notice, we would not expect 

to have any future comments. 

If you have any questions feel free to give me a call. 

Ray and Julie, 

I will write up a Weekly Report entry before I leave today for next week.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1032 

KA 12-01263 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

FREDERICK WEAVER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

CARR SAGLIMBEN LLP, OLEAN (JAY D. CARR OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

LORI PETTIT RIEMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LITTLE VALLEY, FOR RESPONDENT.

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Cattaraugus County Court (M.

William Boller, A.J.), rendered April 23, 2012. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the

fourth degree. 

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance

signed by defendant on July 28, 2013 and by the attorneys for the

parties on July 30 and August 28, 2013,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed 

upon stipulation.

Entered: November 8, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 6 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 6

    Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the need to pass 
   legislation to increase penalties on perpetrators of hate crimes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the need to pass 
   legislation to increase penalties on perpetrators of hate crimes.

Whereas diversity and tolerance are essential principles of an open and 
        free society;
Whereas all people deserve to be safe within their communities, free to 
        live, work, and worship without fear of violence and bigotry;
Whereas crimes motivated by hatred against persons because of their 
        race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual 
        orientation, or disability undermine the fundamental values of 
        our Nation;
Whereas hate crimes tear at the fabric of American society, leave scars 
        on victims and their families, and weaken our sense of 
        community and purpose; and
Whereas individuals who commit crimes based on hate and bigotry must be 
        held responsible for their actions and must be stopped from 
        spreading violence: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the Congress--
            (1) needs to pass legislation that amends the Federal 
        criminal code to set penalties for persons who commit acts of 
        violence against other persons because of the actual or 
        perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, 
        sexual orientation, or disability of any person;
            (2) condemns the culture of hate and the hate groups that 
        foster such violent acts;
            (3) commends the communities throughout our Nation that are 
        united in condemning such acts of hate in their neighborhoods;
            (4) commends the efforts of Federal, State, and local law 
        enforcement officials; and
            (5) reaffirms its commitment to a society that fully 
        respects and protects all people, regardless of race, color, 
        religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, or 
        disability.
                                 <all>
```
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 499

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas George Rogers Clark was a colonial frontiersman

who succeeded in protecting western colonists through diplomacy and advocacy with the colonial government of

Virginia;

Whereas George Rogers Clark doubled the size of colonial

America through western exploration and by founding

towns in Kentucky;
2

•HCON 499 EH

Whereas George Rogers Clark was an expert negotiator with

American Indian tribes, securing trade and security for

western colonists;

Whereas George Rogers Clark ensured American control of

the Northwest Territory by leading a small band of soldiers during the Revolutionary War and successfully capturing British outposts along the Mississippi and Wabash

Rivers;

Whereas George Rogers Clark boldly and courageously led

fewer than 200 soldiers to recapture the British Fort

Sackville at Vincennes, Indiana, in the winter of 1778–

1779;

Whereas the soldiers marched across Illinois through flooded

and frozen territory and reached Vincennes on the

evening of February 23, 1779;

Whereas upon surrounding Fort Sackville, George Rogers

Clark was able to give the impression of having a much

larger army convincing the British that they were no

match for Clark’s forces;

Whereas on the morning of February 25, 1779, the British

Lieutenant Governor Henry Hamilton surrendered Fort

Sackville to George Rogers Clark and his soldiers;

Whereas this victory foiled British attempts to drive the

Americans out of the region west of the Appalachians

and pulled vital resources from the eastern theater during the American Revolution;

Whereas George Rogers Clark showed great leadership by

commanding an expedition northward in 1782 to control

unrest caused by British forces in the region;
3

•HCON 499 EH

Whereas George Rogers Clark continued to offer leadership

after the Revolutionary War by serving as an advisor to

his community; and

Whereas the 250th anniversary of George Rogers Clark’s

birth is November 19, 2002: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress honors George Rogers Clark,

3 whose patriotism and bravery helped to secure American

4 independence and liberty.

Passed the House of Representatives November 15

(legislative day, November 14), 2002.

Attest:

Clerk.

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 499

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring George Rogers Clark.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [WY-923-1310-FI; WYW164675]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement from Equus Energy Corporation for competitive oil and gas lease WYW164675 for land in Converse County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Julie L. Weaver, Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $159 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the BLM is proposing to reinstate lease WYW164675 effective December 1, 2009, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. The BLM has not issued a valid lease to any other interest affecting the lands.                

Julie L. Weaver,

Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication.

[FR Doc. 2012-8102 Filed 4-3-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 11.0

                       LINCOLN PARK BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                 -----------------------------------------------


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                             Three Months Ended    Three Months Ended    Six Months Ended    Six Months Ended
                                                June 30, 2006         June 30, 2005        June 30, 2006       June 30, 2005
                                             ------------------    ------------------    ----------------    ----------------
<S>                                             <C>                    <C>                 <C>                  <C>
Income available to common stockholders         $    94,777            $   163,941         $   181,043          $   283,701

Weighted average shares outstanding               1,794,046              1,818,212           1,800,163            1,818,000

Basic earnings per share                        $      0.05                   0.09                0.10                 0.16
                                                ===========            ===========         ===========          ===========

Income for diluted earnings per share           $    94,777            $   163,941         $   181,043          $   283,701

Total weighted average common shares
 and equivalents outstanding for
 diluted computation                              1,798,922              1,818,212           1,804,325            1,818,000

Diluted earnings per share                      $      0.05            $      0.09         $      0.10          $      0.16
                                                ===========            ===========         ===========          ===========
</TABLE>
#### The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellant, v. Isaac Bingham DE VILLIERS, Appellee.

No. 0-79-663.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Aug. 19, 1981.

Kay E. Huff, Dist. Atty., Norman, Rollie Peterson, Legal Intern, Cleveland County, for appellant.

W. Rodney De Villiers, Sr., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

OPINION

BRETT, Presiding Judge:

The State of Oklahoma has appealed on a reserved question of law from an order of the District Court of Cleveland County, sustaining the appellee’s demurrer to the State’s evidence at the trial of Cleveland County Case No. CRF-79-195. The question is what evidence is needed to establish a prima facie case of knowingly selling an alcoholic beverage to a minor.

*757The basis of the trial court’s dismissal was the State’s alleged failure to show that the appellee knew his customer was a minor. He ruled that the State was required to prove the appellee had actual knowledge that his customer was too young. The evidence presented was that the Norman Police Department recruited a juvenile to go to various stores to attempt to buy alcoholic beverages. He was successful in the appel-lee’s store, where the appellee sold him a bottle of whiskey without asking for any proof of age.

In *Kyle v. State,*366 P.2d 961 (OkI.Cr.1961), this Court said that a seller of alcoholic beverages has a duty to exercise normal powers of observation and draw reasonable conclusions from what he or she sees and hears. *Kyle*dealt with selling an alcoholic beverage to an intoxicated person, but the principle is the same with selling to minors: a merchant cannot blindly sell alcoholic beverages to anyone who offers him money. If a person appears young, the seller is obligated to inquire about age.

In some cases it will be a question of fact whether the seller should have asked the person about his or her age, and it will be up to the jury to decide. The appellee claims that the juvenile looked older than his age, but that is irrelevant to the issue before this Court.

The district court erred in ruling that the State had to prove the appellant had actual knowledge of his customer’s age. It would have been sufficient to show that under the circumstances a reasonable person would have inquired as to his customer’s age, and that he failed to do so.

BUSSEY and CORNISH, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 104 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 104

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
                   protect the Pledge of Allegiance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 27, 2002

Mr. Lucas of Oklahoma introduced the following joint resolution; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
                   protect the Pledge of Allegiance.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``It is not an establishment of religion for teachers in a public 
school to recite, or to lead willing students in the recitation of, the 
following pledge: `I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States 
of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under 
God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.'.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.2


                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vorsatech Ventures, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Peter
Braun, as President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


By:  /s/ Thomas Braun
--------------------------

Thomas Braun
President and CFO
August 16, 2004
# i»f7-r-/v ELECTRONIC RECORD COA # 01-13-00337-CR 

## OFFENSE: Violation ofProtective Order 

## STYLE: ReneVelezv. TheState of Texas COUNTY: Harris COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: Co Crim Ct at Law No 7 

### DATE: 09/25/14 Publish: NO TCCASE#: 1677907



## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS STYLE: Rene Velez v. The State of" FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:Fexas 

### Petition 

# - <*7SW¥ CCA Disposition: DATE: 

## RefUb&D JUDGE: 

# DATE: OlliyjzOlS JUDGE: VJU UaAa^vSIGNED: PC: PUBLISH: DNP: MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: 

### ELECTRONIC RECORD
Document

Exhibit 10.33
Summary of Annual Non-Management Director Compensation
Compensation is made to each member of the Board who is not an employee of the Company, OEP SKNA, L.P. or Sanken Electric Co., Ltd or their respective subsidiaries.
1.Annual Cash Compensation
						
	Annual Cash Retainer (Other than Chairman of the Board)	$	60,000 	
	Annual Cash Retainer (Chairman of the Board)	$	75,000 	
	Additional Cash Retainer for Chair of Audit Committee	$	25,000 	
	Additional Cash Retainer for Chair of Compensation Committee	$	20,000 	
	Additional Cash Retainer for Chair of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee	$	10,000 	
	Additional Cash Retainer for member of Audit Committee	$	10,000 	
	Additional Cash Retainer for member of Compensation Committee	$	8,500 	
	Additional Cash Retainer for member of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee	$	5,000 	


2.Equity Compensation
Each Director serving on the Board as of the date of the Annual Meeting will be granted an award of Restricted Stock Units with a value of $185,000.
Directors elected or appointed to serve on the Board on a date other than the Annual meeting will be granted a prorated award in the first year of service on the Board.
3.Travel Expenses
Directors are reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings.