alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.1


              COMPENSATION INFORMATION FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


         The table below provides information regarding the base salary of each
named executive officer* of GTx, Inc. effective as of July 1, 2005:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                        Base
       Named Executive Officer*                                   Title                             Compensation
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                    <C>                                                          <C>
Mitchell S. Steiner, M.D., F.A.C.S.    Chief Executive Officer and Vice-Chairman of the Board of      $405,000
                                       Directors
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc S. Hanover                        President and Chief Operating Officer                          $275,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henry P. Doggrell                      Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary                  $245,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark E. Mosteller                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                     $227,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

* GTx, Inc.'s Chief Executive Officer and three most highly compensated
executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer who were serving as
executive officers as of December 31, 2004.
DESHAWN GREEN,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2071

Opinion filed November 9, 2016.

Amended Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Deshawn Green, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition seeking belated appeal is denied on the merits. 

WOLF, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 303

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the tax relief

provided for by the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation

Act of 2001 passed by a bipartisan majority in Congress should continue

as scheduled.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 24, 2002

Mr. BACHUS (for himself, Mr. ARMEY, Mr. DELAY, Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma,

Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. COX, Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia,

Mr. BLUNT, Ms. DUNN of Washington, Mr. GRAHAM, and Mr. WICKER)

submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the tax relief provided for by the Economic Growth and

Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 passed by a bipartisan majority in Congress should continue as scheduled.

Whereas on June 7, 2001, President Bush signed into law

the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act

of 2001, which provides millions of taxpayers with the

first meaningful tax relief since 1981;

Whereas all Americans who pay Federal income taxes will

benefit from the Act, which includes across-the-board income tax reductions, reduction of the marriage penalty,

elimination of the death tax, tax rebate checks, doubling
2

HCON 303 IH

of the per-child tax credit, increasing tax-free contributions to Individual Retirement Accounts and a broad

range of other beneficial provisions;

Whereas the Act was passed by a bipartisan majority in Congress of 211 House Republicans, 28 House Democrats,

1 House Independent, 46 Senate Republicans and 12

Senate Democrats, making the Act an important bipartisan achievement; and

Whereas several Member of Congress have recently called for

repealing or delaying tax relief provisions of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the House of Rep3 resentatives that—

4 (1) the tax relief provided for by the Economic

5 Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001,

6 passed by a bipartisan majority in Congress, should

7 continue as scheduled;

8 (2) repealing or delaying provisions of the Eco9 nomic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of

10 2001 is a tax increase;

11 (3) increasing taxes in the midst of a recession

12 would not be helpful to the Nation’s economy or

13 American workers; and

14 (4) instead of increasing taxes, Congress should

15 be working with the President to promote long-term
3

HCON 303 IH

1 economic growth through a fair tax code that puts

2 the least possible burden on taxpayers.

Æ
**OESE Response to the**  **Comment Received During the 60 -**  **day notice period:**

Thank y ou for y our comments on the collection. We have read them and appreciate your submission.
**Exhibit 32.2**
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  
 In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of SNB Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R. Darrell Brewer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   **SNB BANCSHARES, INC.**Date:   November 17, 2004
By:
/s/ R. Darrell BrewerChief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 31 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 31

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 8, 2001

        Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the importance of organ, 
 tissue, bone marrow, and blood donation and supporting National Donor 
                                  Day.

Whereas more than 70,000 individuals await organ transplants at any given 
        moment;
Whereas another man, woman, or child is added to the national organ transplant 
        waiting list every 20 minutes;
Whereas despite the progress in the last 15 years, more than 15 people per day 
        die because of a shortage of donor organs;
Whereas almost everyone is a potential organ, tissue, and blood donor;
Whereas transplantation has become an element of mainstream medicine that 
        prolongs and enhances life;
Whereas for the fourth consecutive year, a coalition of health organizations is 
        joining forces for National Donor Day;
Whereas the first three National Donor Days raised a total of nearly 25,000 
        units of blood, added over 4,000 potential donors to the National Marrow 
        Donor Program Registry, and distributed tens of thousands of organ and 
        tissue pledge cards;
Whereas National Donor Day is America's largest one-day organ, tissue, bone 
        marrow, and blood donation event; and
Whereas a number of businesses, foundations, health organizations, and the 
        Department of Health and Human Services have designated February 10, 
        2001, as National Donor Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) supports the goals and ideas of National Donor Day;
            (2) encourages all Americans to learn about the importance 
        of organ, tissue, bone marrow, and blood donation and to 
        discuss such donation with their families and friends; and
            (3) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling on the people of the United States to conduct 
        appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs to demonstrate 
        support for organ, tissue, bone marrow, and blood donation.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 7, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 435 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 435

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Expressing the sense of the Congress that the therapeutic technique 
 known as rebirthing is a dangerous and harmful practice and should be 
                              prohibited.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 435

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas ``rebirthing'' is a form of ``attachment therapy'', which is used to try 
        to forge new bonds between adoptive parents and their adopted children;
Whereas Candace Newmaker, a child from North Carolina, died from the rebirthing 
        technique, and four other children have died from other forms of 
        attachment therapy;
Whereas the American Psychological Association does not recognize rebirthing as 
        proper treatment; and
Whereas many States have enacted or are considering legislation to prohibit this 
        technique: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This concurrent resolution may be cited as the ``Candace Newmaker 
Resolution of 2002''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING THERAPEUTIC TECHNIQUE KNOWN AS 
              REBIRTHING.

    (a) In General.--It is the sense of the Congress that the 
therapeutic technique known as rebirthing is dangerous and harmful, and 
the Congress encourages each State to enact a law that prohibits such 
technique.
    (b) Definition.--In this resolution, the term ``rebirthing'' means 
a therapy to reenact the birthing process in a manner that includes 
restraint and creates a situation in which a patient may suffer 
physical injury or death.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 17, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Michael Gooch, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of GFI Group Inc.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)              designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)              allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)             anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 

Date:  May 16, 2005

 
| /s/ Michael  Gooch                                              |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael  Gooch  Chairman of the Board,  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
[No. 36276-3-I.

Division One.

July 8, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. John Robert Miller, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Sno-homish County, No. 94-1-01492-1, Linda C. Krese, J., entered March 9, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ Freddie M. KotekName:
    
    Freddie M. KotekTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
    
    May 17, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 68 (Monday, April 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 21082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8488]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket 7-2012]


Epson Portland, Inc.--Expansion of Manufacturing Authority; 
Reopening of Comment Period

    The comment period on the application by the Port of Portland, 
grantee of FTZ 45 to expand the scope of manufacturing authority 
approved within Subzone 45F, on behalf of Epson Portland, Inc. (EPI), 
Hillsboro, Oregon (77 FR 4006-4007, 1/26/2012), has been reopened based 
on a request from an interested party. The comment period for the case 
referenced above is being reopened to May 9, 2012, to allow interested 
parties additional time in which to comment. Rebuttal comments may be 
submitted during the subsequent 15-day period, until May 24, 2012. 
Submissions shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary at: 
Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 2111, 1401 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
    For further information, contact Diane Finver at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#014568606f642f47686f7764734175736065642f666e77"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a4e636b646f244c63647c6f784a7e786b6e6f246d657c">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 482-0473.

    Dated: April 3, 2012.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8488 Filed 4-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[No. 18350-1-II.

Division Two.

June 6, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Michael Dean Adams, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 94-1-01162-8, Waldo F. Stone, J., entered June 1, 1994. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Hough-ton, A.C.J., concurred in by Wiggins and Fleisher, JJ. Pro Tern.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Document provided during public meeting.
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc.



This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered
to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 21, 2021 (the “Agreement”) and
Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-4 (the
“Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the
various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The
capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.



The undersigned certifies
that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the
preceding period from October 21, 2021 through December 31, 2021, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under
the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. |                                         | 
|------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------- | 
|                                     |                                         | 
|By:                                  | /s/ Connie Coffey                       | 
|                                     | Connie Coffey                           | 
|                                     | Executive Vice President, Corporate     | 
|                                     | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
EXHIBIT
      32.1


SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


13
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Lifesciences Opportunities Incorporated
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Roland Perry, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 13 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      October 4, 2007


/s/
                Roland PerryRoland
                PerryChief
                  Executive Officer and Principal Financial
                  Officer
#### LIFE INSURANCE & PENSION HEADQUARTERS AGENCY, INC., and H. Drew Owen, Appellees, v. UNITED FOUNDERS LIFE INSURANCE CO., Appellant.

No. 54656.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 28, 1981.

ORDER

Certiorari is granted for the limited purpose of deleting from the decision the award to the appellant of twenty-five hundred dollars ($2,500) in attorney fees for this appeal. This deletion is without prejudice to presentment of this issue and the amount to the trial court. Certiorari is denied for all other purposes.

WILLIAMS, LAVENDER, SIMMS, DOOLIN and HARGRAVE, JJ., concurring.

IRWIN, C. J., BARNES, V.C.J., and HODGES and OPALA, JJ., dissenting.
#### The George Wiedemann Brewing Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. The United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a Corporation, Defendant in Error.

Division B.

Writ of Error to Circuit Court, Duval county; Rhydon M. Call, Judge.

*Alex St: Clair-Abrams,*for Plaintiff in Error.

*Fleming & Fleming,*for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This action was brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error. There was judgment t for the defendant, and the plaintiff takes writ of error. The judgment is affirmed.

Decision
391 A.2d 677

#### Commonwealth v. Byrd, Appellant.

Submitted September 12, 1977.

Kenneth Mirsky, Assistant Defender, and Benjamin Lemer, Defender, for appellant; Charles A. Klein, Assistant District Attorney, and F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

*591HOFFMAN, J.,

would remand for an evidentiary hearing on counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness pursuant to *Commonwealth v. Twiggs,*460 Pa. 105, 331 A.2d 440 (1975). See also, *Commonwealth v. Aaron,*255 Pa.Super. 289, 386 A.2d 1006 (1978) (Dissenting Opinion by HOFFMAN, J.).

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.