alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 36

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Urging increased Federal funding for juvenile (type

1) diabetes research.

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 36

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas over one million Americans suffer from juvenile

(type 1) diabetes, a chronic, genetically determined, debilitating disease affecting every organ system;

Whereas 13,000 children a year—35 each day—are diagnosed with juvenile diabetes;

Whereas 17,000 adults a year—46 each day—are diagnosed

with juvenile diabetes;
2

•HCON 36 EH

Whereas juvenile diabetes is one of the most costly chronic

diseases of childhood;

Whereas insulin treats but does not cure this potentially

deadly disease and does not prevent the complications of

diabetes, which include blindness, heart attack, kidney

failure, stroke, nerve damage, and amputations; and

Whereas the Diabetes Research Working Group, a nonpartisan advisory board established to advise Congress,

has called for an accelerated and expanded diabetes research program at the National Institutes of Health and

has recommended an increase in Federal funding for diabetes research at the National Institutes of Health over

each of the next five years: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Federal funding for diabetes research

3 should be increased annually as recommended by the Dia4 betes Research Working Group so that a cure for juvenile

5 diabetes can be found.

Passed the House of Representatives June 4, 2002.

Attest:

Clerk.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">TAM Medical Supply Corp., as Assignee of Luis Rojas, Appellant, DECIDED<br><br>against<br><br>American Transit Ins. Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Jodi Orlow, J.), entered December 17, 2013. The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is modified by providing that defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, by order entered December 17, 2013, the Civil Court denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the action was premature because plaintiff had failed to provide requested verification.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <i>TAM Med. Supply Corp., as Assignee of Shameca Dudley v National Liab. &amp; Fire Ins. Co.</i> (___ Misc 3d ___, 2016 NY Slip Op ___ [appeal No. 2014-269 Q C], decided herewith), the order is modified by providing that defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.</p><p>Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: October 11, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 56 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 56

 Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding National Pearl Harbor 
                            Remembrance Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2001

  Mr. Weller submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding National Pearl Harbor 
                            Remembrance Day.

Whereas on December 7, 1941, the Imperial Japanese Navy and Air Force attacked 
        units of the Armed Forces of the United States stationed at Pearl 
        Harbor, Hawaii;
Whereas 2,403 members of the Armed Forces of the United States were killed in 
        the attack on Pearl Harbor;
Whereas there are more than 12,000 members of the Pearl Harbor Survivors 
        Association;
Whereas the 60th anniversary of the attack on Pearl Harbor will be December 7, 
        2001;
Whereas on August 23, 1994, Public Law 103-308 was enacted, designating December 
        7 of each year as National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day; and
Whereas Public Law 103-308, reenacted as section 129 of title 36, United States 
        Code, requests the President to issue each year a proclamation calling 
        on the people of the United States to observe National Pearl Harbor 
        Remembrance Day with appropriate ceremonies and activities, and all 
        departments, agencies, and instrumentalities of the Federal Government, 
        and interested organizations, groups, and individuals, to fly the flag 
        of the United States at half-staff each December 7 in honor of the 
        individuals who died as a result of their service at Pearl Harbor: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress, on the occasion of the 60th anniversary of the 
December 7, 1941, attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, pays tribute to--
            (1) the United States citizens who died in the attack; and
            (2) the members of the Pearl Harbor Survivors Association.
                                 <all>
```
1 Tex. R. A pp. P. 47.2(a). NO. 07-03-0158 -CV IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L A APRIL 16, 2003

_________________________ W ALTER DAILEY, APP ELLANT

V. W AYNE TURNER, ET AL. , APPELLEES

_________________________________ FROM THE 32 0TH DIST RICT COURT OF POTT ER COUNTY; NO. 86287-D; HO NORABL E DON E MERS ON, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPB ELL, JJ. MEM ORAN DUM OP INI ON 1 Appellant fi le d his noti ce of appeal from the trial cour t’s judgm ent that he take nothing in his suit against app ellees. By letter dated April 3, 2003, the Court directed2

appell ant’s counsel to pay thereq uire d fili ng f

ee of $1 25 b efo re a ny f urt her act ion could be taken in t his appeal and also requested that a docketing statem ent be filed as required byRule 32.1 of

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The C ourt also notified appellant thatfai lure t o com ply might result in dism issal pursuant to Rule 42.3(c). In respons e, appellant’s counsel sent a letter indicating that appellanthas relocated without no tifying himof a forwarding address or a ny contact inform ation. Counsel concludes that he will be unable to prosecute appellant’s appeal and requests th at this appeal be dismissed. Although the filing of

the notice of appeal invoked the jurisdiction of this Court, if a partyfails to follow the prescribed r ules of appellate procedure, the appeal m ay be dismissed. Tex . R. App. P . 25.1(b). Thus, becausethe filing fee has not been paid and counsel i ndicates tha t appell ant is unabl e to prosecute thi s appeal, we must dismiss. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for failure to com ply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Proce dure. Te x. R . App. P. 42 .3(c).
Don H. Rea vis Justice
(/)

Cherokee Generating Station

Cherokee Station is one of our largest Colorado power plants in terms

of power production capability

Overview

Location: Just north of downtown Denver.

Plant Description: Cherokee Station is a coal-fired, steam-electric generating station with three operating

units. The plant also is capable of burning natural gas as fuel.

Power Production Capabilities: 611 megawatts (MW): Unit 1 – 107 MW, Unit 3 – 152 MW and Unit 4 – 352

MW.

Fuel Source: Low-sulfur coal supplied by several mines in western Colorado, including Twentymile Mine,

Colowyo Mine, West Elk Mine and Powderhorn Mine.

Plant History

Cherokee Station began operating in 1957 when Unit 1 went into service. It was followed by Unit 2 in 1959,

Unit 3 in 1962 and Unit 4 in 1968.

Interesting Features

Environmental Highlights

Air emissions are controlled at Cherokee Station by baghouses installed on all three units. Baghouses act like

giant vacuum cleaners, removing particulate emissions from the flue gas by more than 99 percent.

The units have low-NOx burners that reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions by about 40 percent.

Unit 1 also has dry sorbent injection (DSI) systems, and Unit 3 has lime spray dryers. These controls, added

as part of Xcel Energy’s voluntary Denver Metro Emission Reduction Plan, will reduce Cherokee's SO2

emissions by about 70 percent from uncontrolled levels.

Cherokee Repowering and Natural Gas Pipeline Projects

Xcel Energy is beginning to implement its Colorado Public Utilities Commission-approved Clean Air-Clean Jobs

plan. We will early retire Cherokee Units 1, 2 and 3 (365 MW), which operate on coal, and install a cleaner,

more efficient natural gas plant (569 MW) at the plant site. We also will switch Cherokee Unit 4 from using coal

to natural gas (352 MW).

Here is our anticipated Cherokee repowering project schedule:

Unit 2 (106 MW) was retired October 2011
Unit 1 (107 MW) retired by June 2012

Unit 3 (152 MW) retired by 2015

New, 569 MW natural gas combined-cycle generating plant comes online in 2015

Unit 4 (352 MW) switched to natural gas in 2017

A new pipeline is needed to deliver the natural gas to our Cherokee power plant for this conversion.

We are proposing to construct approximately 34 miles of new 24” steel gas transmission pipeline from a new

Ft. Lupton gas metering facility to the Cherokee Generating Station. Construction on the new natural gas

pipeline would begin in 2013 with an anticipated in-service date of Oct. 1, 2014.

For more information about this gas pipeline project, including updates, route maps, project schedule,

contacts and more, please visit the Cherokee Project website related link.

For more information about the Clean Air Clean Jobs Act, please visit our website related link located in the

top right corner of this page.

Community Involvement

For more information contact:

Colorado Plant Information and Tour Request

1-800-895-4999

Colorado Media Inquiries

303-294-2300

loading
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: APPEAL OF HAVEN AT ATWATER 

VILLAGE LLC FROM THE DECISION OF 

THE CHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF 

ASSESSMENT APPEALS, MUNICIPALITY 

OF EAST WHITELAND TOWNSHIP, 

CHESTER COUNTY, PA FOR THE TAX 

YEAR 2017 TAX PARCEL NO. 42-02-

0008.03.A0

PETITION OF: HAVEN AT ATWATER 

VILLAGE, LLC

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 67 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth 

Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 10.2(b)


                   Schedule of Warrant (refinancing) Issued by
              NCT Group, Inc. to Carole Salkind on August 10, 2005


                         Expiration           Exercise           Shares
       Grant Date            Date               Price            Granted
       ----------       ------------         ----------        -----------
        08/10/05          08/10/10            $ 0.01           307,750,000
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 291

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress with respect

to the disease endometriosis.

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 291

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas endometriosis is a painful, chronic gynecologic disease;

Whereas, with such disease, tissue that is similar to the endometrium (the tissue lining the inside of the uterus) grows

outside the uterus in the abdominal cavity and results in

internal bleeding, inflammation, and the development of

scar tissue because the tissue has no means of leaving the
2

•HCON 291 EH

body (unlike the monthly development and shedding of

the endometrium through the menstruation process);

Whereas an estimated 10 to 20 percent of American women

of childbearing age have endometriosis;

Whereas endometriosis is a poorly understood disease and

can strike women of any socioeconomic class, age, or

race;

Whereas the disease can affect a woman’s ability to work,

ability to reproduce, and relationships with her mate,

children, and everyone around her;

Whereas infertility occurs in about 30 to 40 percent of

women with endometriosis;

Whereas the cause of endometriosis is unknown;

Whereas the disease can only be definitively diagnosed

through gynecologic surgery;

Whereas studies have shown that the average delay in actual

diagnosis is more than nine years; and

Whereas there is no definitive cure for endometriosis: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) strongly supports efforts to raise public

4 awareness of endometriosis throughout the medical

5 and lay communities; and

6 (2) recognizes the need for better support of

7 patients with endometriosis, the need for physicians

8 to better understand the disease, the need for more
3

•HCON 291 EH

1 effective treatments, and ultimately, the need for a

2 cure.

Passed the House of Representatives October 1,

2002.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Lazaro DESVERGUNDT, Petitioner, v. KOPPERS COMPANY, INC., etc., Respondent.

No. 70574.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 7, 1988.

Gerald E. Rosser, P.A., and Herman M. Klemick, Miami, for petitioner.

George, Hartz & Lundeen, P.A., and Ralph 0. Anderson of Daniels & Hicks, P.A., Miami, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We review *Desvergundt v. Koppers Co.,*506 So.2d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), to answer two certified questions of great public importance. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. The certified questions are as follows:

> I. WHETHER THE LEGISLATIVE AMENDMENT OF SECTION 95.-031(2), FLORIDA STATUTES (1983), ABOLISHING THE STATUTE OF REPOSE IN PRODUCT LIABILITY ACTIONS, SHOULD BE CONSTRUED TO OPERATE RETROSPECTIVELY AS TO A CAUSE OF ACTION WHICH ACCRUED BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE AMENDMENT.

> II. IF NOT, WHETHER THE DECISION OF *PULLUM V. CINCINNATI, INC.,*476 S0.2D 657 (FLA.1985), *APPEAL DISMISSED,*[475], U.S. [1114], 106 S.CT. 1626, 90 L.ED.2D 174 (1986), WHICH OVERRULED *BATTILLA V. ALLIS CHALMERS MFG. CO.,*392 S0.2D 874 (FLA. 1980), APPLIES SO AS TO BAR A CAUSE OF ACTION THAT ACCRUED AFTER THE *BATTILLA*DECISION BUT BEFORE THE *PULLUM*DECISION.

506 So.2d at 60. We recently answered the first question in the negative and the second question in the affirmative in *Melendez v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.,*515 So.2d 735 (Fla.1987). We approve the decision below on the authority of *Melendez.*

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
      32**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John C. Roman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Lee R. Schlesinger,
      Vice President and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of the date
      and for the period covered by the Report.








/s/
      John C. Roman


John
      C.
      Roman


President
      and Chief Executive Officer





/s/
      Lee R. Schlesinger


Lee
      R.
      Schlesinger


Vice
      President and Treasurer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)








Date:
      May
      8, 2006




20
391 A.2d 675

#### Commonwealth v. John Valentine Brown, Appellant.

Submitted March 13, 1978.

Allen H. Smith, for appellant; Floyd P. Jones, Assistant District Attorney, and John C. Uhler, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2021-3 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify andrepresent that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofJuly 21, 2021, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2021-3 and Citibank, N.A. (the “Agreement”) during the period thatis the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By: 
/s/ Marc Womack
Name: Marc WomackTitle: EVP, Head of OperationsDate: March 31, 2022By: 
/s/ Erik Laney
Name: Erik LaneyTitle: TreasurerDate: March 31, 2022**
[No. 31622-2-I.

Division One.

June 3, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Che Andre Taylor, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 91-1-07416-6, Norma Smith Huggins, J., entered October 20, 1992. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50560 

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KELLY HARGRAVES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:04-CR-160-2

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kelly Hargraves appeals his sentence for two counts of

attempting to manufacture methamphetamine. He contends that the

district court erred in applying the U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(6)(C)

enhancement to his sentence for creating a substantial risk of

harm to the life of a minor.

Section 2D1.1(b)(6)(C) provides that if an offense involved

the manufacture of methamphetamine and created a substantial risk

of harm to the life of a minor or incompetent, the offense level
No. 05-50560

-2-

should be increased by six levels. The guideline’s commentary

instructs that in determining whether the offense created a

substantial risk of harm to human life or the environment, the

district court shall consider the following factors: (1) the

quantity of any chemicals or hazardous substances found at the

laboratory and the manner in which they were stored; (2) the

manner of disposal of the hazardous or toxic substances and the

likelihood of their release into the environment; (3) the

offense’s duration and the size of manufacturing operation; and

(4) the laboratory’s location (e.g., whether it was located in a

residential versus a remote area) and the number of human lives

enduring a substantial risk of harm. § 2D1.1(b)(6)(C), comment

(n.20(A)). A “minor” is defined as a person who has not yet

attained the age of 18. Id. at n.20(B); § 2A3.1, comment (n.1).

Contrary to Hargraves’s assertions, the presentence report

(PSR) and the factual basis, which the district court relied on

in applying the enhancement, clearly reflect that a minor was

present in the residence while Hargraves was manufacturing

methamphetamine. Hargraves’s own argument at the sentencing

hearing, that the minor was not present “during all the cooks,”

implies that the minor was present “during some of the cooks.” 

The PSR further reflects that chemical materials were found

inside the residence and also in close proximity to the

residence. In light of the evidence before the district court,

it cannot be said that the district court clearly erred in
No. 05-50560

-3-

applying the § 2D1.1(b)(6)(C) enhancement. Cf. United States v.

Simpson, 334 F.3d 453, 457-59 (5th Cir. 2003) (court did not

uphold enhancement because there was no evidence that a minor was

present during the time the defendant was involved in the

manufacturing process). Accordingly, Hargraves’s sentence is

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**INTERLINEBRANDS, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Interline Brands, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 27, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Grebe,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ MICHAEL J. GREBE                                          |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael J. Grebe                                              |   |
| Chairman of the Board,  Chief Executive Officer and President |   |
| May 4,  2009                                             |   |

 

----
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 2405

In re: WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR. , Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. ( 5:14

- cr - 00240

- BR

- 1 ; 5:18

- cv - 00238

- BR )

Submitted : April 4, 2019 Decided: April 8, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
William Scott Davis, Jr. , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: William Scott Davis, Jr., petitions for a writ of mandamus directing several district court judge s to recuse themselves from various cases involving Davis

. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used onl y in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S.
Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). We have reviewed Davis’ petition and conclude that he has not established the existence of extraordinary circumstances warranting mandamus relief. Davis’ allegations fall far short o f those necessary to warrant recusal, In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir. 1987), and mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal, In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED