alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
April 27, 2015
The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx Secretary of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, D.C. 20590 Dear Secretaries Foxx and Kerry: The Honorable John F. Ker ry Secretary of State U.S. Department of State 2201 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20520

Houston is home to George Bush Intercontinental Airport, William P. Hobby Airport, and Ellington Airport, all under the direction of the City of Houston Department of Aviation, which operates and maintains the Houston Airport System. The three-airport system served more than 50 million passengers in 2012, including more than 8.7 million international travelers. The airports represent a significant contribution to Houston and the surrounding communities' economies.
The Bay Area Houston Economic Partnership has been working to provide the leadership to stimulate reg ional economic development and employment in southeast Texas for almost 40 years. During this time, we have partnered with the Houston Airport System on numerous initiatives to support the growth of the aviation indu s try, which is critical to any international city such as Houston. If Houston were an independent nation, it would rank as the world's 30th la rges t econo my. Ninety-two countries have consular offices in Houston, the third h ighest in the nation.
All of this translates to the fact that Houston relies on safe, reliable and affordable airline transportation to take care of business. However, according to America's airlines, including United, American and Delta, their interna tional business is being threatened by three Persian Gulf states' airlines (Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways, and Emi rate s) that have received $42 billion in subsidies and other benefits from their governments since 2004. If these reports are accurate, this is in direct violatio n of international trade rules- the Open Skies policy- that were established to promote airline competition among nations. America's airlines, which often struggle financially, cannot compete against the luxury that $42 billion can buy.
I realize that this is a very complicated international issue, but it is one that must be reso lved to preserve the stability and growth of this nation's airline industry, which supports 11 million American jobs and $1.5 trillion in economic activity. Thank you for your prompt attention to this urgent matter.
Sincere! ,

# I Bob Mit ell President



# s 10-150505-009 P. O
. B ox 53724 llouston Texas 772 53-3724 Voice : 812.536.3255 Fax: 832
. 536.3258 www.bayareahouston.com

# -**~AREA \HOUST** **N ~**  Economi c Partnershi p P.O. 13ux 58724**ll ou~ton.**  1cxa' 77 .l58

- 8724



# s 10-150505-009 The Honorable Anthony R. 

### Foxx Secretary of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, D.C. 20590

'1'''' 1 •1



### •••11J!,,,Jj,lljlllr,lllltl•illlj,,JII'II'J'IIIj''llll••
Cite as 2017 Ark. 320

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

No. CV-17-672

CARL PRINCE 

APPELLANT

V.

WENDY KELLEY, DIRECTOR

APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered November 16, 2017

MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK

DISSENTING OPINION.

JOSEPHINE LINKER HART, Justice

I refuse to join the majority’s disposal of this matter by syllabus entry. In my view, this

disposition could be interpreted as part of a systematic effort to thwart Mr. Prince’s access to

a writ of habeas corpus. That we cannot do.

Although Mr. Prince’s filing is styled “Pro Se Motion for Rule on the Clerk,”1it is

actually a request that this court assume jurisdiction over his petition for a writ of habeas

corpus. It states:

1. Comes now Carl Prince (in pro-se) as a habeas applicant needing this honorable

court to take jurisdiction of his habeas petition.

2. No Circuit Court has been able to accept jurisdiction due to multiple transfers to

separate prison units by the Arkansas Department of Correction.

3. Prince’s habeas petition has merit as there is no state statute authorizing the “split”

sentence he is being detained on.

1 A motion for rule on clerk is a mechanism provided by Arkansas Supreme Court

Rule 2-2 whereby this court can deal with records and other filings that are untimely

tendered.
Cite as 2017 Ark. 320

WHEREFORE This motion properly requests a Rule on Clerk authorizing filing of

the habeas petition and affidavit of indigency. 

Requesting this court to take jurisdiction of his habeas petition is eminently reasonable. 

There is both constitutional authority and statutory authority for this court taking jurisdiction

of Mr. Prince’s case. Article 7, section 4, of the Arkansas Constitution gives this court full 

power to issue writs of habeas corpus, as does the Arkansas habeas statute, Arkansas Code

Annotated § 16-112-102(a)(1) (Repl. 2016). While dismissing Mr. Prince’s habeas petition

may be expedient, it does not comport with even the most rudimentary concept of justice.

In Simpson v. Sheriff of Dallas County, 333 Ark. 277, 968 S.W.2d 614 (1998), this court

expressed a more fitting appreciation for the writ of habeas corpus. The Simpson court noted

that in Ex parte Bollman, 4 Cranch 75, 95 (1807), Chief Justice John Marshall referred to the

writ of habeas corpus as the “great writ,” and further noted that in Ex parte Yerger, 8 Wall. 85

(1868), Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase wrote that the writ “has been for centuries esteemed

the best and only sufficient defense of personal freedom.” It is disconcerting that this court

now demonstrates so little regard for the great writ that it has reduced Mr. Prince’s search for

a court to hear his petition to something akin to the children’s game of “keep away.”

In my view, justice demands that this court either assume jurisdiction of Mr. Price’s

habeas petition for the purpose of deciding it on the merits or simply transfer it to the circuit

court in the county in which Mr. Prince is incarcerated. Dismissing his petition for

expediency’s sake is abrogating this court’s responsibility as a guarantor of justice. 

I respectfully dissent.

BAKER, J., joins.

2
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2008-1118; Dir ID 2007-NM-318-AD
[Logo MAAX Corporate]


                                                                     MEMORANDUM
DATE:    July 22, 2005

TO:      Terry Rake

CC:      Sophie Fortin, Denis Aubin

FROM:    Andre Heroux

SUBJECT: Sector Head - Spa and Cabinetry Sectors

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Terry:

First of all, I would like to thank you for accepting to take on an additional
challenge as MAAX Sector Head for both, the Spa and Cabinetry Sectors.

We, the Board members, believe that you will do a great job in handling these
additional responsibilities and you will be successful in implementing a LEAN
Thinking Culture in the Cabinetry Sector with your leadership by example.

We recognize that your job will now entail additional responsibilities and we
will increase your annual salary up to one hundred ninety thousand dollars ($US
190,000) per year as of August 1st, 2005.

Once again, congratulations! I wish you the best of success in your new
challenge as MAAX Sector Head of the Spa and Cabinetry Sectors.

Best regards,

/s/ Andre Heroux

Andre Heroux
President and CEO


AH:ll


HEAD OFFICE
1010 Sherbrooke W. St., Suite 1610
Montreal, Quebec H3A 2R7 Canada
Tel: 514 844-4155
Fax: 514 985-4155
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF ST. GEORGE METALS,  INC. (A DEVELOPMENT  STAGE COMPANY)
INCLUDED IN ITS FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2000 (in thousands)
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                                    6
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          6
<PP&E>                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           84
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  4860
<BONDS>                                                6945
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                            1949
<COMMON>                                               9285
<OTHER-SE>                                          (22955)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             84
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         15
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           805
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      847
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (787)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (787)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (787)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.06)


</TABLE>