alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In  connection  with the  accompanying  Annual  Report  on Form  10-KSB of Diamond  Entertainment  Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),  I, James K.T. Lu, President and Co-Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



(1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and results

of operations of the Company.







/s/ James K. T. Lu



-----------------------



James K. T. Lu

Title: President and Co-Chief Executive Officer



Date:  March 15, 2004
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 416

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Congratulating the Navy League of the United

States on the occasion of the centennial of theorganization’s founding.

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 416

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the Navy League of the United States was founded

in 1902 with the encouragement of President Theodore

Roosevelt to serve and support the United States sea

services, namely the Navy, Marine Corps, Coast Guard,

and Merchant Marine;

Whereas the Navy League has more than 77,000 active members;
2

•HCON 416 EH

Whereas the Navy League is unique among military-oriented

associations in that it is a civilian organization dedicated

to the education of American citizens and the support of

the members of the sea services and their families;

Whereas the Navy League supports active duty members of

the sea services through the adoption of naval vessels, installations, and units and the hosting of commissioning

ceremonies, award programs, and other recognition programs;

Whereas the Navy League supports America’s young people

through its youth programs, including sponsorship of the

Naval Sea Cadet Corps and the Navy League Scholarship

Program, and through its promotion of youth-oriented

activities in local communities, such as the Reserve Officers’ Training Corps and other recognized youth programs;

Whereas the Navy League is widely respected by citizens,

community and industry leaders, and public officials; and

Whereas Navy League programs are welcomed in communities throughout the United States, and members of the

Navy League are recognized for their integrity and patriotism: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress, on the occasion of the

3 centennial of the founding of the Navy League of the

4 United States in 1902, congratulates the Navy League

5 and its members for their role as the foremost civilian or-
3

•HCON 416 EH

1 ganization dedicated to supporting the United States sea

2 services.

Passed the House of Representatives June 24, 2002.

Attest:

Clerk.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 424

Commending the patriotic contributions of the roofing professionals who replaced, at no cost to the Federal Government, the section of the Pentagon’s slate roof that was destroyed as a result of the terrorist attacks

against the United States that occurred on September 11, 2001.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 24, 2002

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ (for herself, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. TOOMEY, Ms. MILLENDERMCDONALD, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. THUNE, Mr. BRADY of

Pennsylvania, Mr. PENCE, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, Mr. COMBEST,

Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mrs.

CHRISTENSEN, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mrs. KELLY, Mr.

GONZALEZ, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. PHELPS, Mr. FERGUSON, Mr. LANGEVIN,

Mr. ISSA, Mr. BAIRD, Mr. GRAVES, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. SCHROCK,

Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. GRUCCI, Mr. ACEVEDO-VILA ́, Mr. AKIN, Mr.

CARSON of Oklahoma, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. ROSS, and Mr. SHUSTER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending the patriotic contributions of the roofing professionals who replaced, at no cost to the Federal Government, the section of the Pentagon’s slate roof that was

destroyed as a result of the terrorist attacks against

the United States that occurred on September 11, 2001.

Whereas the damage to the Pentagon that resulted from the

terrorist attacks against the United States that occurred
2

•HCON 424 IH

on September 11, 2001, included the destruction of more

than an acre of the Pentagon’s slate roof;

Whereas roofing professionals from throughout the United

States, mostly from small businesses, volunteered to work

together to replace the destroyed section of the Pentagon’s roof;

Whereas these roofing professionals donated approximately

$450,000 worth of labor and materials to the replacement effort; and

Whereas these roofing professionals successfully replaced

60,000 square feet of the Pentagon’s slate roof before

September 11, 2002, and at no cost to the Federal Government: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress commends the patriotic con3 tributions of the roofing professionals who replaced, at no

4 cost to the Federal Government, the section of the Penta5 gon’s slate roof that was destroyed as a result of the ter6 rorist attacks against the United States that occurred on

7 September 11, 2001.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 378 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 378

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending the District of Columbia National Guard, the National Guard 
    Bureau, and the entire Department of Defense for the assistance 
      provided to the United States Capitol Police and the entire 
   Congressional community in response to the terrorist and anthrax 
                 attacks of September and October 2001.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 378

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the terrorist and anthrax attacks of September and October 2001 required 
        Congress and the entire Congressional community to respond to a 
        heightened state of emergency;
Whereas the men and women of the United States Capitol Police were required to 
        shoulder the greatest burden of this emergency response by working 
        tremendously increased hours under difficult conditions, requiring great 
        sacrifices by them and their families;
Whereas the District of Columbia National Guard responded to the call of the 
        Capitol Police Board and provided National Guard troops to assist the 
        United States Capitol Police in protecting the Capitol complex, 
        providing great relief to the members of the United States Capitol 
        Police; and
Whereas the combined efforts of the United States Capitol Police and the 
        District of Columbia National Guard have made the Capitol complex secure 
        for Members of Congress, Congressional employees, and visitors, and 
        thereby have enabled Congress to continue to discharge its 
        constitutional duties on behalf of the American people: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress commends the District of Columbia National Guard, the 
National Guard Bureau, and the entire Department of Defense for the 
assistance provided to the United States Capitol Police and the entire 
Congressional community in response to the terrorist and anthrax 
attacks of September and October 2001.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 23, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Title: Enforceable Consent Agreement for the Laboratory-Scale 

Incineration Testing of Fluoropolymers – Interim 

Report No. 8 

OPPT Docket ID No: OPPT-2003-0071 

Date of Interim Report: June 22, 2009 

This Report covers the period from January 1, 2009 to June 22, 

2009. 

1) List or description of significant ECA Test Program 

milestones during this period: 

Test substance composites 1, 2, and 4 for this project have been 

prepared and sent to the University of Dayton Research Institute 

(UDRI). UDRI received these composites on February 23, 2009. 

(Receipt of test substance composite 3 at UDRI was previously 

reported in Interim Report No. 5.) 

Thermogravimetric analysis of the test substance composites was 

performed at the University of Dayton Research Institute (UDRI) 

on April 23-24, 2009. 

Carbon and hydrogen analysis of the test substance composites 

was performed at Akron Rubber Development Laboratory (Gilchrist 

Road location) on May 28, 2009. 

Total fluorine analysis of the test substance composites was 

performed at StereoChemical, Inc. during May 29 - June 16, 2009. 

See attached quarterly QA/QC status reports. 

2) Description of Difficulties: (If none indicate N/A) 

N/A 

3) Actions taken in response to difficulties: If none 

indicate N/A) 

N/A 

4) Other information relevant to the progress of the testing 

program: (If none indicate N/A) 

N/A
exv4w1



 





EXHIBIT 4.1






	
NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER AGENT. INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF
THE STATE OF DELAWARE.

AUTHORIZED COMMON STOCK:
80,000,000 SHARES
PAR VALUE: $.0001

CUSIP NO. 89784N 10 4

Shares of TRUE RELIGION APPAREL, INC. Common Stock
transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized
attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate
is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the
Registrar.

Witness the facsimile seal of the corporation and the facsimile signatures of
its duly authorized officers.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of JER Investors
Trust Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), J. Michael McGillis, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |        |  |                           
|----------------------- |  | ------ |  | --------------------------
|Date: November 10, 2008 |  |        |  | /s/    J. Michael McGillis
|                        |  | Name:  |  | J. Michael McGillis       
|                        |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. 1350)**

I, Gary M. Clifford, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of I-Link Incorporated;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)         [Intentionallyomitted];

 

(c)          Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

 

(d)         Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)         Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: October 14, 2003

 
| By:    | /s/  Gary M. Clifford |
|--------|----------------------------|
|   | Gary M. Clifford           |
|   | Chief Financial Officer    |

 

----
#### WEST GREELEY NATIONAL BANK, Plaintiff, v. Loretta Phares WYGANT, formerly Loretta Phares, Defendant-Appellant, and Hope L. Robinson and the Estate of George A. Robinson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 82CA0029.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

Aug. 5, 1982.

James S. Kimmel, Frank Barone, Little-ton, for defendant-appellant.

Louis C. Rieker, Thomas A. Richardson, Greeley, for defendants-appellees.

STERNBERG, Judge.

George Robinson purchased a money market certificate from the West Greeley National Bank in 1979, and named his stepdaughter, defendant Loretta Wygant, as the pay on death (P.O.D.) beneficiary. On April 24, 1980, however, having by then married defendant Hope Robinson, he orally requested the bank to change the beneficiary to his wife. Six months later he died. When both the widow and stepdaughter claimed to be entitled to the proceeds of the certificate, the bank filed an interpleader action under C.R.C.P. 22. The court ordered the funds to be distributed to the widow, and the stepdaughter appeals. We affirm.

Wygant contends that the deceased’s oral request to change the P.O.D. beneficiary was invalid because it was not in writing and signed pursuant to § 15-15-105, C.R.S. 1973. That section provides:

> “The provisions of section 15-15-104 as to rights of survivorship are determined by the form of the account at the death of a party. This form may be altered by written order given by the parties to the financial institution to change the form *1340of the account or to stop or vary payment under the terms of the account. The order or request must be signed by all parties to the account, received by the financial institution during the lifetime of all parties, and not counter-manded by other written order of all parties during their lifetimes.... ”

The trial court held that this requirement was for the bank’s protection. We agree. The intent of the depositor was to change the P.O.D. beneficiary. He went to the bank, informed the assistant cashier in charge of operations that he intended to change the beneficiary, and watched the cashier strike Wygant’s name and insert his new wife’s name in the blank for the P.O.D. beneficiary on the certificate. To require a writing and signature for this procedure would exalt form over substance.

Wygant next asserts that the certificate of deposit was a negotiable instrument and, therefore, required her endorsement to change the beneficiary. However, in order for an instrument to be negotiable there must be an unconditional promise to pay a sum certain. Section 4-3-104(b), C.R.S. 1973. *See also*§ 4-3-109(2), C.R.S. 1973 and § 4-3-105, C.R.S. 1973. The P.O.D. clause specifically conditioned payment to Wygant on death of the owner, thus taking the instrument out of § 4-3-104 for purposes of requiring Wygant’s endorsement under § 4-3-201, C.R.S. 1973.

Judgment affirmed.

COYTE and KELLY, JJ., concur.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 372

Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to United Nations General

Assembly Resolution 1322.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 12 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. LOTT (for Mr. GRAMS (for himself and Mr. BROWNBACK)) submitted the

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to United

Nations General Assembly Resolution 1322.

Whereas in an Emergency Special Session, the United Nations Security Council voted on October 7, 2000, to approve Resolution 1322, which unfairly blames Israel for

the outbreak of violence and politicizes the Geneva Convention;

Whereas Resolution 1322 singles out Israel for the use of excessive force against Palestinians while ignoring identical

acts perpetrated by Palestinians against Israelis;

Whereas Resolution 1322 incorrectly labels the September

28, 2000, visit of Israeli opposition leader Ariel Sharon

to Temple Mount, a holy place open to all members of

all faiths, as the ‘‘provocation’’ for violence;
2

•SRES 372 IS

Whereas there is clear evidence this violence was a premeditated and coordinated action by the Palestinian Authority

and Palestinian militias;

Whereas Israeli army officials noted a sharp increase in attacks against security forces and Israeli civilians in the

weeks before September 28, 2000, including the killing of

one soldier and the wounding of another in a Gaza Strip

ambush on September 27;

Whereas the Palestinian Authority has used official Palestinian television and the Voice of Palestine radio to incite

violence;

Whereas there is evidence that Fatah leader Marwan

Barghouti, Chairman Arafat’s top political lieutenant in

the West Bank, has been orchestrating the rioting of

armed uniformed police and civilians;

Whereas the United States refused to veto Resolution 1322,

although United States Ambassador to the United Nations Richard Holbrooke reportedly declared it ‘‘unbalanced, biased, and really a lousy piece of work’’; and

Whereas the United States has vetoed three anti-Israel Security Council Resolutions since the 1993 Oslo Accords and

has still played a constructive role in the peace process

as an ‘‘honest broker’’: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate hereby—

2 (1) denounces the United States failure to vote

3 against United Nations Security Council Resolution

4 1322;

5 (2) condemns the United Nations Security

6 Council for its discrimination against the State of
3

•SRES 372 IS

1 Israel and its efforts to manipulate the Fourth Ge2 neva Conference for the sole purpose of attacking

3 Israel; and

4 (3) urges the leaders of the Israeli and Pales5 tinian peoples to seek a secure future through the

6 end of violence and the resumption of the peace

7 process.

Æ
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 315

To require the display of the Ten Commandments in the chambers of the

House of Representatives and the Senate.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 6, 2002

Mr. KERNS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on House Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To require the display of the Ten Commandments in the

chambers of the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Whereas the Ten Commandments have had a significant impact on the development of the fundamental legal principles on which Western civilization and the United

States are based;

Whereas the Ten Commandments are a code of moral conduct, observance of which promotes a peaceful and organized society; and

Whereas the text of the Ten Commandments is currently displayed on several government properties and in several

government buildings: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

•HCON 315 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Ten Command3 ments Public Display Resolution of 2002’’.

4 SEC. 2. POSTING OF THE TEN COMMANDMENTS.

5 The Architect of the Capitol shall prominently display

6 the text of the Ten Commandments in the chambers of

7 the House of Representatives and the Senate. The form,

8 size, manner of display, and location of the text so dis9 played in the chamber of the House of Representatives

10 shall be determined by the Architect of the Capitol in con11 sultation with the Speaker of the House of Representa12 tives. The form, size, manner of display, and location of

13 the text so displayed in the chamber of the Senate shall

14 be determined by the Architect of the Capitol in consulta15 tion with the President pro tempore of the Senate.

Æ