alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Annex to Contract of Employment - Walter Schillings - dated February 15, 2000



 Exhibit 10.4 
  
 Annex to Contract of Employment 
  
 With effect from 15.02.2000, between 
  
 Franklin Electronic Publishers Deutschland GmbH, represented by its sole shareholder, Franklin Electronic Publishers Euro-Holdings B.V. 
  
 And 
  

Mr. Walter Schillings 
  
 it is hereby agreed the amendment of Paragraph II, subparagraph 2 and subparagraph 3 (which shall become void) of the service agreement of March 11, 1996 in the actual version, last amended with the supplement of
01.Oct.1999, as follows: 
  

	(2)	The terms and conditions of the service agreement with Mr. Schillings shall be continued under a fixed duration period of three years with effect from February 15th 2000 through February 14th 2003. Any extension of this service agreement past February 14, 2003 shall be consummated by the parties, if at all, not later than six month prior to the end of this fixed term, that is prior to
August 15th 2002. 

  
 In case that the service agreement will be terminated on initiation of Franklin without “important cause” for
reasons other than change of control of Franklin Electronic Publishers Inc., Mr. Schillings will receive as compensation in complete satisfaction of this service agreement a payment equal to his then current salary for the remainder of the term. For
the purpose of determination of the annual bonuspayment, the business result at the time of termination shall be decisive. “Important Cause” is defined in particular but not limited to as dishonesty, fraud or gross negligence. 







 If a change of control of Franklin Electronic Publishers Inc. occurs and the service agreement will be
terminated on initiation of Franklin prior to the ending of the duration period, Mr, Schillings will receive two years the then current salary or the then current salary for the completion of the term, whichever is greater, in complete satisfaction
of this service agreement. For the purpose of determination of the annual bonus payment, the business result at the time of termination shall be decisive. 
  
 In case the service agreement shall be terminated on initiation of Mr. Schillings prior to the ending of the duration period, he agrees to continue all
his management duties and responsibilities for at least of a six month period since the written declaration that he wants to terminate the service agreement. 
  
 den : 9.5.2000 
  

							
	 	 	 /s/

	 	 	 	 /s/ Walter Schillings


	 	 	 Franklin Electronic
 Publishers (Deutschland)

GmbH
	 	 	 	Walter Schillings

  

 2
**Exhibit32.2**

**INTERLINEBRANDS, INC.**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Interline Brands, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending September 29, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas J. Tossavainen, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ THOMAS J. TOSSAVAINEN |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Thomas J. Tossavainen     |   |
| Chief Financial Officer   |   |
| November 8, 2006          |   |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

PETER KOST Y SHYN
,
Defendant Below
, Appellant,

v.

NEW CASTLE COUNTY
,
Plaintiff Below Appellee. § § § No. 11 9 , 2023 § § Court Below

— Superior Court § of the State of Delaware § § C .A. No. N 22J

- 0287 2 § § §

Submitted: July 18, 2023 Decided: July 20 , 2023

Before SEITZ , Chief Justice; TRAYNOR and GRIFFITHS
, Justices.

ORDER

After consideration of the notice to show cause and the appellant’s response, it appears to the Court that:
(1) The appellant, Peter Kostyshyn, filed this appeal from a monition action
in the Superior Court. On June 1, 2023, the Court denied Kostyshyn’s motio n to
proceed in forma pauperis . The Senior Court Clerk advised Kostyshyn to pay the
filing fee by June 1 6 , 2023 or a notice to show cause would issue. Kostyshyn failed
to pay the filing fee. He also failed to pay the Superior Court appeal preparation fe e.
(2) On June 16, 2023, the Chief Deput y Clerk issued a notice, by certified
mail, directing Kost y shyn to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed
for his failure to pay the filing fee and the Superior Court appeal preparation fee.2

Postal record s show that the notice has been in transit since June 24, 2023 . On July
5, 2023, the Chief Deputy Clerk reissued the notice to show cause by first class mail.

Both notices to show cause were sent to the address Kostyshyn provided, and
continues to provid e, to this Court

. (3) On July 18, 2023, Kostyshyn filed various documents in this appeal that

are deemed to be his response to the notice to show cause

. The documents do not
address his failure to pay the filing fee or the Superior Court appeal preparation fe e. In light of Kostyshyn’s failure to pay the filing fee and the Superior Court appeal
preparation fee, this appeal must be dismissed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b),

that this appeal is DISMISSED

.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ N. Christopher Griffiths Justice
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 350

Expressing the sense of Congress that amnesty should not be granted to

individuals who are in the United States, or its territories, illegally.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 14, 2002

Mr. KERNS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that amnesty should not

be granted to individuals who are in the United States,

or its territories, illegally.

Whereas in 2000, there were an estimated 8,000,000 illegal

aliens living in the United States according to the Bureau of the Census;

Whereas the granting of amnesty under the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 has not curtailed the flow

of illegal aliens to the United States;

Whereas granting amnesty to illegal aliens would reward

those who break the laws of the United States;

Whereas granting amnesty to illegal aliens would demonstrate

that the United States is not committed to upholding and

enforcing its laws;
2

•HCON 350 IH

Whereas granting amnesty to illegal aliens could encourage

additional illegal immigration;

Whereas granting amnesty to illegal aliens would undermine

the process of legal immigration into the United States;

Whereas it is vital to national security to ensure the integrity

of the Nation’s borders;

Whereas the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, further

demonstrated the necessity of securing the Nation’s borders; and

Whereas granting amnesty to illegal aliens would subvert the

efforts of the Border Patrol, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the Customs Service, the Coast Guard,

and other agencies that work to secure the Nation’s borders: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that amnesty

3 should not be granted to individuals who are in the United

4 States, or its territories, illegally.

Æ
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 278

Concerning the outbreak of terrorist violence in the Middle East.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 19, 2001

Mr. WELDON of Florida (for himself and Mr. PENCE) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Concerning the outbreak of terrorist violence in the Middle

East.

Whereas the United States is engaged in a war against terrorists and terrorist organizations involved in the attack

on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon that occurred on September 11, 2001, and against the perpetrators of other acts of terrorism against our Nation;

Whereas the United States is fully committed to engagement

and pursuing peace in the Middle East;

Whereas the President has declared that he will use any and

all means available to bring to justice the perpetrators of

these acts of terrorism and to prevent future acts of terrorism against the people of the United States; and
2

•HCON 278 IH

Whereas Israel has fallen victim to numerous similar unspeakable acts of violence committed by terrorists against

the people of Israel: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress—

3 (1) expresses its solidarity with the people of

4 Israel in using all appropriate methods to end ter5 rorist violence against Israel;

6 (2) having embarked on a similar effort to

7 eradicate global terrorism, stands in solidarity with

8 Israel and its objectives to abolish terrorism and

9 commends Israel for its cooperation in this effort;

10 (3) recognizes that any resolution to the Pales11 tinian homeland question can only be resolved so

12 long as Israel’s right to exist in security is fully re13 spected;

14 (4) expresses its concern that the Palestinian

15 Authority has failed to effectively curb the incite16 ment of violence which contributes to a wider accept17 ance of acts of terrorism against innocent civilians;

18 and

19 (5) expresses concern that the Palestinian Au20 thority has failed to respond quickly and forcefully

21 to prevent acts of terrorism and to bring to justice
3

•HCON 278 IH

1 those individuals who have committed acts of ter2 rorism.

Æ
From: Mason, Steve Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 8:48AM To: Belke, Jim <Belke.Jim@epa.gov> 

### S

ubject: RE: Emergency planning coordination meetings The ones I have gone to in the past, the actual meeting time was probably a little shorter (around 3 hours), but ifyou add in the travel tim es to and from meetings, etc. , the facility and locals would say the time comm itment is probably close to 4 hours on average ... so 4 hours shoul d be reasonable ... And yes, this is based on going to many, many coordination meetings between facil ities and commu nities (either preplanning) or even t he afte r action reviews afte r an incid ent where the discussions were on the prior releases and preplanning for future events...

Stc:phc:n Ma3-0n I! PA Rc:gion 6 (6S I'. PI! I 144S Ross Av<>nuc: , Dall ;:ss 1 TX 75202 2 1 4·66$.227 6

**m;~:~on**. .::stc:vc:tlc:p:a.gov "'FI"'QUOI\Uy, nUl

**U•o<>e~l\& ~**  bofOd ....**~Walk** ciO\Itio,. ro tt'f/ lni)Utt\.. OtiOft. tN• &

**~bad 1hlna**  **·** From : Belke, Jim Sent : Tuesday, September 01, 2015 7:41AM To: Mason, Steve Su b ject: Emergency planning coordination meetings Hi Steve - I have a co uple of qu ick questions for you relating to the emergency planning coordination provision in the proposed rule. In the Reg Impacts Analysis for the RMP NPRM, we estimate the unit costs of the annual coordination meeting to entai l an average of4 hours of facility management time. That would be an average across all categories of facilities- so obviously more for larger, complex facilities, but less for very simple facilities. I am not sure but I vaguely remembe r a discussion where we concluded that a half day meeting was probably a reasonable average. So, my questions are:

Thanks! Jim Does that sound to you like a reasonable average estimate for an annual coordination meeting? If so, can we say that this is based on EPA's experience with participating in actual coordination meetings between facilities and local responders? My recollection is that you have done this sort of thing a bunch of times, but I thought I'd check with you on it.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months period ended December 31, 2008 of the MacroShares $100 Oil Up Trust (the "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Samuel Masucci, III, principal executive officer of MACRO Securities Depositor, LLC, which acts as the depositor for the Registrant (the "Depositor"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

Date: February 17, 2009

| |                                                              
| | -------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ SAMUEL MASUCCI, III                                      
| | Samuel Masucci, III                                          
| | Chief Executive Officer of Depositor, on behalf of
Registrant
Exhibit 99.5



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OR 15d-14
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SAR BANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



I, Tal Hayek, certify that:



1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of AcuityAds Holdings Inc.;



2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report;



3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.     The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:



a)     Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)     Evaluated
the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)     Disclosed
in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting;
and



5.    The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)    All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)    Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control
over financial reporting.



March 10, 2022



| | By: | /s/ Tal Hayek                 
| | --- | ------------------------------
| |     | Name: Tal Hayek               
| |     | Title: Chief Executive Officer
EX-4.1






CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF




RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF




P-COM, INC.




(Pursuant to Section 242 of the




Delaware General Corporation Law)




P-COM, INC. (the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, by its duly authorized officer, does hereby certify:



FIRST: That the Board of Directors of the Corporation duly adopted resolutions setting forth
proposed amendments to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation and declaring
said amendments to be advisable and recommended for approval by the stockholders of the
Corporation.



SECOND: That the amendments were duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section
242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.



THIRD: That upon the effectiveness of this Certificate of Amendment, the first paragraph of
Article IV of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended such
that, as amended, said paragraph shall read in its entirety as follows:



This Corporation is authorized to issue two (2) classes of stock, to
be designated, respectively, “Common Stock” and “Preferred Stock.”
The total number of shares that this Corporation is authorized to
issue is Two Hundred Fifty Two Million (252,000,000) shares. Two
Hundred Fifty Million (250,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock,
par value $.0001 per share, and Two Million (2,000,000) shares shall
be Preferred Stock, par value $.0001 per share. Upon this amendment
of this Article IV (the “Effective Time”), (i) each share of Series
C Convertible Preferred Stock of the Corporation issued and
outstanding shall be automatically converted into seven-eighths
(7/8ths) of a share of Series G Convertible Preferred Stock and one
thousand seven hundred fifty (1,750) shares of Common Stock of the
Corporation, without any action by the holders thereof.



FOURTH: That upon the effectiveness of this Certificate of Amendment, the first paragraph of
Article VI of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended such
that, as amended, said paragraph shall read in its entirety as follows:



Elections of directors need not be by written ballot unless the
Bylaws of this Corporation shall so provide. At each annual meeting
of stockholders, directors of the Corporation shall be elected to
hold office until the expiration of the term for which they are
elected, and until their successors have been duly elected and
qualified; except that if any such election shall not be so held,
such election shall take place at a stockholders’ meeting called and
held in accordance with the Delaware General Corporation Law.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation has
been executed on this 12th day of August, 2005.



	 	 	 
	P-COM, INC.

By:

	 	

/s/ Daniel W. Rumsey
	
 
	 	 
	
 
	 	Daniel W. Rumsey

Secretary
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 187

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp

should be issued in honor of Harold Washington, the 42d mayor of Chicago.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 18, 2001

Mr. BLAGOJEVICH submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative

postage stamp should be issued in honor of Harold

Washington, the 42d mayor of Chicago.

Whereas Mayor Harold Washington was an exemplary public

servant and dynamic leader who dedicated his life to his

beloved Chicago and to equal opportunity for all of Chicago’s citizens;

Whereas Washington was a graduate of DuSable High

School, Roosevelt University, and the Northwestern University School of Law;

Whereas Washington served his country during World War II

with the 1887th Engineer Aviation Battalion in the

South Pacific, where his unit received the Meritorious

Service Unit award, and he was honorably discharged

after highly decorated military service;
2

•HCON 187 IH

Whereas Washington served the city of Chicago as a legislator in the Illinois House of Representatives, the Illinois

State Senate, and the United States House of Representatives;

Whereas in 1983 Washington was the first African-American

elected mayor of Chicago after a record voter turnout,

and after a campaign that centered around reform and

an end to political patronage;

Whereas while mayor of Chicago, Washington achieved countless important developments for the city of Chicago, including the creation of the city’s Ethics Commission, enhanced minority and small business contracting, opening

city government to the freedom of information standards,

and a more equitable provision of public services to city

neighborhoods;

Whereas Washington was elected to a second term as mayor

in 1987 with ambitious plans for his second term;

Whereas Washington tragically passed away at his office desk

in City Hall on November 25, 1987; and

Whereas the issuance of a postage stamp recognizing Washington’s contributions will broaden the understanding of

his work, his contributions to the city of Chicago and the

United States, and his stature as a trailblazer and role

model for Chicagoans of all racial and ethnic backgrounds: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) a postage stamp should be issued by the

4 United States Postal Service in honor of Harold

5 Washington; and
3

•HCON 187 IH

1 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

2 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

3 such a postage stamp be issued.

Æ
**Exhibit32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of BG Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Robert Grubbs, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
|   |   | /s/ J. Robert Grubbs                  |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |   | J. Robert Grubbs                      |
|   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | May 15, 2007                     |

 

22

----