alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 174 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 174

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the Rotunda of the Capitol to be used on July 26, 2001, for 
  a ceremony to present Congressional Gold Medals to the original 29 
                          Navajo Code Talkers.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 174

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on July 26, 
2001, for a ceremony to present Congressional Gold Medals to the 
original 29 Navajo Code Talkers. Physical preparations for the ceremony 
shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 
Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 10, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 10 

, 2019

Order 

Clerk

May 10, 2019

157930(17)

IN THE MATTER OF 

THERESA M. BRENNAN, JUDGE

53rd DISTRICT COURT SC: 157930

JTC Formal Complaint No. 99

BEFORE THE JUDICIAL TENURE COMMISSION

____________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of respondent judge to exceed the page 

limitation for her brief in support of the petition is GRANTED. The 69-page brief 

submitted on May 9, 2019, is accepted for filing.
**Exhibit99.4**

 

**I-LINKINCORPORATED**

 

# **OFFICER’SCERTIFICATION**

# **PURSUANTTO**

# **SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

# **(18U.S.C. 1350)**

 

April 30, 2003

 

The undersigned Gary M. Clifford, duly appointed and incumbent officerof I-Link Incorporated, a Florida corporation (the “Corporation”), inconnection with the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annualperiod ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), does hereby represent, warrantand certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, asamended, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.  The Report is in full compliance with reporting requirements of Section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Corporation.

 

 
|   | /s/ Gary M. Clifford    |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Gary M. Clifford        |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
##### 



POLYPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Polypore International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 16, 2006
    
    /s/ Robert B. TothRobert B. TothPresident and Chief Executive Officer
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 147

Supporting the efforts and activities of individuals, organizations, institutions,

and other entities to honor fatherhood on Father’s Day.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 26 (legislative day, MAY 25), 2001

Mr. DAVIS of Illinois (for himself and Ms. CARSON) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Supporting the efforts and activities of individuals, organizations, institutions, and other entities to honor fatherhood

on Father’s Day.

Whereas children who are raised without their fathers account for 63 percent of youth suicides, 71 percent of

pregnant teenagers, 90 percent of homeless and runaway

children, 85 percent of behavioral disorders exhibited by

children, and 71 percent of high school dropouts, in the

United States;

Whereas a father’s presence in the life of a child is a powerful deterrent to delinquency;

Whereas children who maintain relationships with their fathers are more likely to develop healthy adult relationships and to feel secure regarding who they are;
2

•HCON 147 IH

Whereas polling data show that Americans believe the most

significant familial or social problem facing the United

States is the physical absence of the father from the

home;

Whereas the United States has the highest number of singleparent households with dependent children of all developed nations;

Whereas children who remain involved with their fathers are

5 times more likely to develop into productive adults; and

Whereas families in the United States will grow and remain

healthier and stronger if local communities, States, and

the Federal Government assist and support the participation of fathers in the child rearing process: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress supports the efforts and ac3 tivities of individuals, organizations, institutions, and

4 other entities to honor fatherhood on Father’s Day.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Annual Report of ECCO Energy Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB/A for the year ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Samuel
M. Skipper, Chief Executive Officer, and N. Wilson Thomas, Chief Financial
Officer the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.




Date:
      September 22, 2008
              By:
      /s/ Samuel M.
      SkipperName:
      Samuel M. SkipperTitle:
      Chief Executive OfficerDate:
      September 22, 2008
              By:/s/ N. Wilson
      ThomasName:
      N. Wilson ThomasTitle:
      Chief Financial
Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Ex parte Zella FORBUS. Re BRENTWOOD PARK APARTMENTS v. Zella FORBUS.

Civ. 5495.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

June 10, 1987.

L. CHARLES WRIGHT, Retired Appellate Judge.

Whereas on the fifteenth day of May 1987 the Supreme Court of Alabama, 510 So.2d 242, reversed the judgment of this court, 510 So.2d 240, entered on September 17, 1986 and remanded the cause to this court for further proceedings;

It is hereby ordered that the judgment of September 17, 1986 be and the same is set aside. It is further ordered that a writ of mandamus shall be granted directing the Honorable Jerry L. Fielding, Circuit Judge of Talladega County, Alabama, to set aside his order of July 17, 1986 whereby Zella Forbus was ordered dispossessed of the apartment leased from Brentwood Park Authority unless she filed a supersedeas bond pending her appeal to said circuit court.

It is further ordered that the appeal from the district court to the circuit court shall thereafter proceed according to law.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by Retired Appellate Judge L. CHARLES WRIGHT while serving on active duty status as a judge of this court under the provisions of section 12-18-10(e), Code 1975, and this opinion is hereby adopted as that of the court.

WRIT OF MANDAMUS GRANTED ON REMAND.

All the Judges concur.
#### Albert Ray ANDERSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-2151.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 21, 1988.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and N. Joseph Durant, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Steven T. Scott, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and NESBITT, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

BARKDULL and NESBITT, JJ., concur.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge

(dissenting).

While the actions of the defendant may well have given rise to a founded suspicion that he had committed some offense in the immediate past, they gave no indication whatever that he was about to engage in criminal conduct in the near future, as is required to sustain a charge of loitering and prowling. *D.A. v. State,*471 So.2d 147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). As in the highly similar cases of *Springfield v. State,*481 So.2d 975 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) and *Chamson v. State*(Fla. 3d DCA Case no. 86-2862, opinion filed, June 21, 1988), the loitering and prowling arrest was therefore invalid and the contraband seized from the defendant’s person as a result should have been suppressed.
*       *       *       *       *








EXHIBIT 32




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.


SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION


906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned officers each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of China YCT International Group, Ltd. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 1, 2011
/s/ Yan Tinghe
 Yan Tinghe, Chief Executive Officer





Date: March 1, 2011
/s/ Li Chuanmin
 Li Chuanmin, Chief Financial Officer








This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 33 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 33

    Recognizing the Boy Scouts of America for the public service it 
 performs through its contributions to the lives of the Nation's boys 
                             and young men.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2001

     Mr. Buyer (for himself and Mr. Hayes) submitted the following 
   concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Recognizing the Boy Scouts of America for the public service it 
 performs through its contributions to the lives of the Nation's boys 
                             and young men.

Whereas scouting is the largest voluntary youth movement in the world, with a 
        membership totaling more than 25 million;
Whereas the Boy Scouts of America is an organization that was incorporated on 
        February 8, 1910, and recognized by Federal charter on June 15, 1916, to 
        provide an educational program for boys and young men to build 
        character, train in the responsibilities of participatory citizenship, 
        and develop personal fitness;
Whereas the Boy Scouts of America teaches the core values of duty to God and 
        country, personal honor, respect for the beliefs of others, 
        volunteerism, and interdependence with the environment, principles which 
        are conducive to good character, citizenship, and health;
Whereas the Boy Scouts of America is a model for inclusiveness, with 6 million 
        boys and young men from every ethnic, religious, and economic 
        background, including those with disabilities and special needs, 
        participating in scouting programs across the United States;
Whereas the Supreme Court has ruled that the Boy Scouts of America, as a 
        private, voluntary, nonbusiness organization, has the right to set its 
        own standards for membership and leadership; and
Whereas by promoting and fostering those qualities in America's youth which form 
        the strong foundation of this Nation, the Boy Scouts of America has made 
        a contribution of immeasurable value to the welfare of the entire 
        Nation: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress recognizes the Boy Scouts of America and expresses 
appreciation for the public service it performs through its 
contributions to the lives of the Nation's boys and young men.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . Copies of the agreements are available through the Commission's Web site (                    *www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     012057-007.                

*Title:*                     CMA CGM/Maersk Line Space Charter, Sailing and Cooperative Working Agreement Asia to USEC and PNW-Suez/PNW & Panama Loops.                

*Parties:*                     A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S and CMA CGM S.A.                

*Filing Party:*                     Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Cozen O'Connor; 1627 I Street, NW Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006.                

*Synopsis:*                     The amendment would delete Morocco from the scope of the agreement, reflect the deployment of a sixteenth vessel, and revise the space allocations of the parties accordingly.                

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Dated: March 30, 2012.

Rachel E. Dickon,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-8123 Filed 4-3-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
June 2, 2015

Richard McFall

3808 48 St NW Mandan, ND 58554

Dear Mr. McFall:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your March 25, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0745), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### Theodore C. SAFFOLD, Appellant, v. Doris L. SAFFOLD, Appellee.

No. 87-0725.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 14, 1987.

*802William M. Holland, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Joseph W. Gibson, Miami, for appellee.

LETTS, Judge.

In a property settlement agreement, entered into incident to a marriage breakup, it was provided that “the husband and the wife hereby agree that each will be responsible for their own attorney fees incurred in any action for dissolution of marriage.” Notwithstanding this provision, and the incorporation of the property settlement agreement into the final judgment, the court on a later occasion granted attorney’s fees and costs to the wife. We reverse.

The wife relies on a line of cases holding that a provision in an agreement where one spouse waives or limits his right to attorney’s fees may be disregarded. *See Blanton v. Blanton,*413 So.2d 453 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); *Jackson v. Seder,*467 So.2d 422 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); and *Young v. Young,*322 So.2d 594 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). However, we do not agree that any one of these three cases is applicable to the instant situation.

The final judgment entered into, in the case at bar, only provided that “the court reserves jurisdiction of this cause and the parties thereto for the purpose of enforcement and/or modification of this final judgment.” It did not reserve jurisdiction for the purpose of granting attorney’s fees at a later date. Moreover, the same final judgment incorporated the property settlement agreement without any mention of any deviations therefrom. Indeed, in the closing sentence, “the parties [were] ordered to comply with its terms.” From this scenario we conclude that the court was without jurisdiction, some six months later, to hold a hearing and award attorney’s fees to counsel for the wife.

This cause is reversed and remanded in accordance herewith.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ANSTEAD and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
#### STATE ex rel. Willie R. BOLEN v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 87-KH-0099.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1987.

In re Bolen, Willie R.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, prohibition, mandamus or habeas corpus; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18748-KH; Parish of Bienville, 2nd Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 22668.

Denied.