alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 66 (Thursday, April 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20646]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8213]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Human Genome Research Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Loan Repayment Program.
    Date: April 25, 2012.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Human Genome Research Institute, 5635 Fishers 
Lane, 3rd Floor Conference Room, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Keith McKenney, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, NHGRI, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 20814, 
301-594-4280, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2d404e464843434854466d404c444103434445034a425b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dbb6b8b0beb5b5bea2b09bb6bab2b7f5b5b2b3f5bcb4ad">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: Center for Inherited Disease Research Access 
Committee.
    Date: April 26, 2012.
    Time: 11:30 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Camilla E. Day, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, CIDR, National Human Genome Research Institute, National 
Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4075, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-402-8837, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f291939f9b9e9e93dc96938bb29c9b9adc959d84"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="187b797571747479367c796158767170367f776e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 28, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-8213 Filed 4-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50183 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
LUIS CARLOS VAZQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(EP-02-CR-1303-11)

-------------------- Before JOLLY, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Defendant-Appellant Luis Carlos Vazquez (Vazquez) appeals his
conviction for possession with intent to distribute 1,000 kilograms

or more of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He

argues that he did not knowin gly, intelligently, and voluntarily
waive his Sixt h Amendment right to conflict-free counsel. He

contends that the district court erred in failing to conduct an

a dequate hearing under F E D
. R. C RIM
. P. 44(c) to determine whether2

any conflict of interest might exist or arise because of his

c ounsel’s joint representation of Vasquez and his co-defendant

brother. He argues further that the district court erred in failing to conduct a second hearing pursuant to F ED
. R. C RIM
. P.

4 4(c) when a conflict became apparent during the sentencing hearing.
Vazquez ha s failed to demonstrate an actual conflict of
interest in his counsel’s joint representation. S ee United States

v. Rico , 51 F.3d 495, 509 (5th Cir. 1995). Therefore, the district court did not err in allowing the same counsel to represent both Vazquez and his brother; neither did it err in not conducting a

second hearing pursuant to F ED
. R. C RIM
. P. 44(c). S ee United States

v. Newell , 315 F.3d 510, 520 (5th Cir. 2002); Unite d States v.
Lyons , 703 F.2d 815, 820 (5th Cir. 1983).

AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-10439

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CAROLYN MARIE WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:94-CR-225-1-X

- - - - - - - - - -

October 22, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Carolyn Marie Williams appeals her conviction by guilty plea

of interfering with commerce by robbery, aiding and abetting, and

using a firearm during a crime of violence. Williams contends

that the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, is unconstitutional as

applied to her case because the $128 taken from Subway and the

$220 taken from Little Caesar’s did not substantially affect

interstate commerce. Williams argues against the “aggregation”

and “depletion-of-assets” theories of effects on interstate

commerce and contends that our prior caselaw holding against her

position was wrongly decided and should be overruled. Williams 
No. 98-10439

-2-

seeks to distinguish the facts of her case from previously

decided cases essentially because far less money was taken in her

case than was taken in the other cases. Williams contends that

the constitutional violation in her case rendered district court

without jurisdiction over the Hobbs Act violations; rendered her

indictment under the Hobbs Act insufficient; and required the

reversal of her firearms convictions because she could not be

prosecuted for the underlying Hobbs Act violations in federal

court.

Williams did not raise the contentions she urges on appeal

in the district court. Accordingly, our review is for plain

error. United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir.

1994)(en banc)).

The Hobbs Act does not facially violate the Commerce Clause. 

United States v. Robinson, 119 F.3d 1205, 1213 (5th Cir. 1997),

cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 1104 (1998). A particular robbery need

not have a substantial effect on interstate commerce to violate

the Hobbs Act. Id. at 1215.

One panel of this court may not overrule another panel. 

United States v. Taylor, 933 F.2d 307, 313 (5th Cir. 1991). 

Williams’s contention that Robinson and this court’s other cases

rejecting her position should be overruled therefore is

unavailing.

Williams’s appeal is without arguable merit and is

frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Williams’s appeal therefore is dismissed as frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 348 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 348

To express the sense of the Senate that the Secretary of the Treasury, 
   acting through the United States Customs Service, should conduct 
 investigations into, and take such other actions as are necessary to 
prevent, the unreported importation of ginseng products into the United 
                     States from foreign countries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 6, 2000

Mr. Feingold submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                        the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To express the sense of the Senate that the Secretary of the Treasury, 
   acting through the United States Customs Service, should conduct 
 investigations into, and take such other actions as are necessary to 
prevent, the unreported importation of ginseng products into the United 
                     States from foreign countries.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. UNREPORTED IMPORTATION OF GINSENG PRODUCTS.

    It is the sense of the Senate that the Secretary of the Treasury, 
acting through the United States Customs Service, should, to the 
maximum extent practicable, conduct investigations into, and take such 
other actions as are necessary to prevent, the importation of ginseng 
products into the United States from foreign countries, including 
Canada and Asian countries, unless the importation is reported to the 
Service, as required under Federal law.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 35924-0-I.

Division One.

July 29, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Gerald Henderson, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-1-05582-4, James Noe, J., entered January 6, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
i»f7-r-/v

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 01-13-00337-CR OFFENSE: Violation of Protective Order

STYLE: Rene Velezv. The State of Texas COUNTY: Harris

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: Co Crim Ct at Law No 7

DATE: 09/25/14 Publish: NO TCCASE#: 1677907

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

STYLE: Rene Velez v. The State of"

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

Fexas

Petition

- <*7SW¥

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

RefUb&D JUDGE:

DATE: OlliyjzOlS

JUDGE: VJU UaAa^vSIGNED: PC:

PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 311

Recognizing the Civil Air Patrol for 60 years of service to the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 2002

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the Civil Air Patrol for 60 years of service

to the United States.

Whereas the Civil Air Patrol was established on December 1,

1941, in the Office of Civilian Defense;

Whereas during World War II the volunteer units of the Civil

Air Patrol conducted search and rescue missions, provided air transportation for military personnel and cargo,

towed targets for the training of Army Air Corps gunners, and patrolled the coasts of the United States

searching for enemy submarines;

Whereas by the end of World War II the Civil Air Patrol had

flown more than 500,000 hours, sunk 2 German U-boats,

and saved hundreds of crash victims;
2

HCON 311 IH

Whereas on July 1, 1946, the Civil Air Patrol was chartered

by the United States as a nonprofit, benevolent corporation;

Whereas on May 26, 1948, the Civil Air Patrol was permanently established as a volunteer auxiliary of the United

States Air Force;

Whereas since 1942 the cadet programs of the Civil Air Patrol have trained approximately 750,000 youth, providing

them with leadership and life skills;

Whereas since 1942 the Civil Air Patrol has flown more than

1,000,000 hours of search and rescue missions, saving

several thousand lives; and

Whereas since 1951 the aerospace education programs of the

Civil Air Patrol have provided training and educational

materials to more than 300,000 teachers, who have educated more than 8,000,000 students about aerospace:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress recognizes the Civil Air Patrol

3 for 60 years of service to the United States.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher R. Huber, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                             |  |                                                         
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Dated: August 11, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    CHRISTOPHER R.
HUBER
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                       |  | Christopher R. Huber                                    
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                      |  | Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Operations
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                             |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
[No. 17575-4-II.

Division Two.

August 23, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Keith J. Bennett, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kit-sap County, No. 93-1-00431-0, William J. Kamps, J., entered September 17, 1993. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Houghton, A.C.J., and Turner, J.
RECEIVED 

7nll JUN I l P I: 4 \ 

Glenn H Brown 

Pathfinder 

Aviation JUN· .- 6. 2G12 

'HEARING lDOCKET 

Senior Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Alaska Region, Federal Aviation Administration 

222 W. ih Avenue #14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

RE: Response to complainant's motion to deem certain facts admitted and for a decision 

regarding the violation letter received May 18, 2012. FDMS No. F AA-2012-0028 

May 25,2012 

Mr. Brown, 

Pathfmder did file an SDR report. The discrepancy between your understanding and ours 

lies in the details of when the report was filed and why. We did not believe that an SDR 

was required. Immediately following the incident we were in discussion with the FAA 

and the NTSB offices in Anchorage to determine if the event was even reportable. After 

the classification was made, and we were made aware of it, we filed the SDR. As I 

mentioned before, Pathfinder has had a perfect safety record and excellent relations with 

the FAA regarding operations. I believe a warning letter in this case is more appropriate. 

¥:ift:* IVlichael W Fell 

President 

CC (Original): 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 

CC: 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20, US Dept of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, S.E., Washington DC 20590 

PO Box 375 Homer, Alaska 99603 

(907) 226-2800 office (907) 226-2801 fax
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months period
      ended March 31, 2008 of the MACROshares Oil Up Tradeable Trust (the
      " **Registrant** "),
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      " **Quarterly**  **Report** "),
      I,
      John A. Flanagan, principal financial officer of MACRO Securities Depositor,
      LLC, which acts as the depositor for the Registrant (the " **Depositor** "),
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly represents,
                in all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
                of the
                Registrant.









Date:
      May
      15, 2008




/s/
        John A.
        Flanagan


John
      A.
      Flanagan


Chief
      Financial Officer of the Depositor,


on
        behalf
        of the Registrant
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Liang Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of Synutra International, Inc. (the “Registrant”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date: August 9, 2010
/s/ Liang ZhangName: Liang ZhangTitle: Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Registrant’s Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2353 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2353

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Rhenogran CLD-80.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Voinovich (for himself and Mr. Brown) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Rhenogran CLD-80.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RHENOGRAN CLD-80.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.74 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Rhenogran CLD-80) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective column period and inserting ``12/
31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer of GFI Group Inc.**

**Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of GFI Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Gooch, Chairman andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

 

1.                 The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: November 9,2009

 
| /s/ MICHAEL GOOCH         |     |
|---------------------------|----------|
| Michael Gooch             |     |
| *Chairman of the Board*   | * * |
| *Chief Executive Officer* | * * |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David M. Engert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc.



|                       |  |  |  |        |  |                                                                    
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 05, 2010 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/    DAVID M.
ENGERT                                             
|                       |  |  |  | Name:  |  | David M. Engert                                                    
|                       |  |  |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 331

Commending the Secretary of Transportation and the Nation’s air traffic

controllers for their actions to avert further tragedy following the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 14, 2002

Mrs. BONO submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending the Secretary of Transportation and the Nation’s air traffic controllers for their actions to avert

further tragedy following the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.

Whereas following the terrorist attacks on September 11,

2001, the Secretary of Transportation acted quickly and

decisively in directing the Nation’s air traffic controllers

to land and account for all aircraft in United States airspace;

Whereas in response to this directive, the Nation’s air traffic

controllers acted in a calm and professional manner in

securing all of the aircraft; and
2

•HCON 331 IH

Whereas the actions of the Nation’s air traffic controllers

may well have averted further tragedy following the terrorist attacks: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress commends the Secretary of

3 Transportation for his quick and decisive actions following

4 the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, and the Na5 tion’s air traffic controllers for their heroic actions on that

6 day to avert further tragedy.

Æ