alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 360

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives

and conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 20, 2002

Mr. GOSS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was considered

and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of

Representatives and conditional recess or adjournment

of the Senate.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Wednesday, March 20, 2002, or Thursday,

4 March 21, 2002, on a motion offered pursuant to this con5 current resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee,

6 it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, April 9, 2002,

7 or until Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to

8 section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs

9 first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns at

10 the close of business on Thursday, March 21, 2002, Fri-
2

•HCON 360 ATH

1 day, March 22, 2002, or Saturday, March 23, 2002, on

2 a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution

3 by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed

4 or adjourned until noon on Monday, April 8, 2002, or at

5 such other time on that day as may be specified in the

6 motion to recess or adjourn, or until Members are notified

7 to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent res8 olution, whichever occurs first.

9 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

10 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

11 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead12 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

13 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble at such place

14 and time as they may designate whenever, in their opinion,

15 the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 270 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 270

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 28, 2001

        Received and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress that Americans should take time during 
 Native American Heritage Month to recognize the many accomplishments 
               and contributions made by native peoples.

Whereas Native Americans were the original inhabitants of the lands that now 
        constitute the United States of America;
Whereas Native American governments developed the fundamental principles of 
        freedom of speech and separation of powers in government, and these 
        principles form the foundation of the United States Government today;
Whereas Native American societies exhibited a deep respect for the Earth and its 
        resources, and such values are widely held today;
Whereas Native Americans have served with valor in every American conflict, from 
        the Revolutionary War to the war against terrorism, often serving in 
        greater numbers, proportionately, than the population of the Nation as a 
        whole;
Whereas Native Americans have made distinct and important contributions to the 
        United States and the rest of the world in many fields, including 
        agriculture, medicine, music, language, and art;
Whereas Native Americans deserve to be recognized for their individual 
        contributions to American society as artists, sculptors, musicians, 
        authors, poets, artisans, scientists, and scholars;
Whereas November has been declared Native American Heritage Month because it is 
        traditionally the month when Native Americans harvested their crops and 
        is generally a time of celebratory feasting and giving thanks; and
Whereas, now, more than ever, Americans of all origins, faiths, and beliefs need 
        to come together as a Nation in support of our people, our common 
        values, and our republican principles: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of Native American 
        Heritage Month; and
            (2) encourages Federal, State, local, and tribal 
        governments; interested groups and organizations; and the 
        American people to honor and recognize the accomplishments, 
        contributions, and heritage of Native Americans with 
        appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 27, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
1 Ogulei, David

From: **Ogulei, David** Sent: **Friday, March 28, 2014 4:44 PM** To: **Paddock, Nancy** Cc: **Dennis Warchol** Subject: **RE: Title V Request regarding material processing a reas and emissions calculations** 

Hi Nancy,

As stated in your email below, the emissions compar ison shown in the table below is for one calendar y ear. Which year is this? Do you have emissions data for more than one calendar year that show what the differenc e in emissions between the two methods is? The email say s you looked at 5 years of TRI data.

Thanks,

David

From: Paddock, Nancy [mailto:nancy.paddock@veolia.com] Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 1:43 PM To: Ogulei, David Cc: Dennis Warchol Subject: Title V Request regarding material processing area s and emissions calculations

Hello David,

Section 2.2(E)(3) of TWI's 2008 Title V permit stat es that the TANKS program must be used to calculate emissions from MP1, MP2 and LPR.

Last year, a consultant reviewed our emissions inve ntory process. The **Surface Evaporation Model from EPA Guidance EIIP Volume II:Chapter 8 Section 4.1.4.**  **Preferred and Alternative Methods for Estimating Ai r Emissions from Paint**  **and Ink Manufacturing Facilities, March 1998. Equa tion 8.4-18 was used to calculate emissions from**  MP1, MP2 and LPR. The consultant compiled an average of 5 years of th e most recent TRI concentration data to determine t he concentration of VOC and HAP in the waste, which wa s then used in the EPA Surface Evaporation Model referenced above.

TANKS is based on routine displacement of liquids. The surface evaporation model is based on the vola tility and ability of a compound to evaporate from the su rface of solids and then be picked up by the air in the building and carried to the atmosphere. The evapor ation method seems to be more appropriate for MP1, MP2 and LPR; TWI would like to change section 2.2(E)(3 ) of the upcoming permit (or the equivalent section thereof) to indicate the Surface Evaporation Model will be used to calculate emissions from these sour ces.

This table compares emissions calculated by both me thods for the same calendar year:

TANKS Model Evaporative

model area TPY lb TPY lb MP-1 0.06 117 0.21 424 MP-2 0.02 44 0.11 212 LABPACK/REPACK 0.03 68 0.04 852 I hope this makes sense. Please let me know if you have questions.

Thank you,

Nancy

Nancy Paddock Environmental Engineering Specialist Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. 7 Mobile Avenue Sauget, IL 62201 618.271.2804 (x-115) 618.271.2128 (fax)



### Please note that my e-mail address has changed: Nancy.Paddock@Veolia.com

This e-mail message from Veolia ES Technical Solutio ns, L.L.C. is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privi leged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you a re not the intended recipient, please communicate with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all cop ies of the original message and delete it from all computers.
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SI Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of the Company as of and for the period covered
by this Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Rheo A. BrouillardRheo A. BrouillardPresident and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 11, 2006By:

/s/ Brian J. HullBrian J. Hull Executive Vice President,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer August 11,
2006
----

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the report. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | /s/  Robert J. Halloran, Jr.           |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Robert J. Halloran, Jr.                          |   |
|   |   | President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6841

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ORRIS L. AVENT, a/k/a Junie Red,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Arenda Wright Allen, 

District Judge. (4:99-cr-00055-AWA-5)

Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 26, 2012

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Orris L. Avent, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard Murphy, 

Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Orris L. Avent seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order treating his motion to dismiss the indictment as a 

successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion, and 

dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless

a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Avent has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, we construe Avent’s notice of appeal and 

informal brief as an application to file a second or successive 
3

§ 2255 motion. United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 

(4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a 

successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on 

either: (1) newly discovered evidence, not previously 

discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to 

establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for 

constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found 

the movant guilty of the offense; or (2) a new rule of 

constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by 

the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review. 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2255(h) (West Supp. 2012). Avent’s claims do not satisfy 

either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to 

file a successive § 2255 motion.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 227 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 227

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas all Americans are united in condemning, in the strongest possible terms, 
        the terrorists who planned and carried out the attacks against the 
        United States on September 11, 2001, and in pursuing all those 
        responsible for these attacks and their sponsors until they are brought 
        to justice and punished;
Whereas the Arab-American, South Asian-American, and American Muslim communities 
        are a vital part of the Nation;
Whereas on September 12, 2001, in a mass for the Nation and the victims of the 
        terrorist hijackings and attacks, Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, the 
        Archbishop of Washington, D.C., reminded all Americans in prayer that 
        ``we must seek the guilty and not strike out against the innocent or we 
        become like them who are without moral guidance or direction'';
Whereas the heads of State of several Arab and predominantly Muslim countries 
        have condemned the terrorist attacks on the United States and the 
        senseless loss of innocent lives; and
Whereas vengeful threats and incidents of violence directed at law-abiding, 
        patriotic Americans of Arab or South Asian descent, particularly the 
        Sikh community, and adherents of the Islamic faith have already 
        occurred: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) declares that in the quest to identify, bring to 
        justice, and punish the perpetrators and sponsors of the 
        terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, 
        that the civil rights and civil liberties of all American, 
        including Arab-Americans, American Muslims, and Americans from 
        South Asia, should be protected; and
            (2) condemns any acts of violence or discrimination against 
        any Americans, including Arab-Americans, American Muslims, and 
        Americans from South Asia.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 15 
      (legislative day, September 14), 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 227

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

   Condemning bigotry and violence against Arab-Americans, American 
Muslims, and Americans from South Asia in the wake of terrorist attacks 
  in New York City, New York, and Washington, D.C., on September 11, 
                                 2001.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 31 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 31

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the importance of organ, 
 tissue, bone marrow, and blood donation and supporting National Donor 
                                  Day.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 31

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas more than 70,000 individuals await organ transplants at any given 
        moment;
Whereas another man, woman, or child is added to the national organ transplant 
        waiting list every 20 minutes;
Whereas despite the progress in the last 15 years, more than 15 people per day 
        die because of a shortage of donor organs;
Whereas almost everyone is a potential organ, tissue, and blood donor;
Whereas transplantation has become an element of mainstream medicine that 
        prolongs and enhances life;
Whereas for the fourth consecutive year, a coalition of health organizations is 
        joining forces for National Donor Day;
Whereas the first three National Donor Days raised a total of nearly 25,000 
        units of blood, added over 4,000 potential donors to the National Marrow 
        Donor Program Registry, and distributed tens of thousands of organ and 
        tissue pledge cards;
Whereas National Donor Day is America's largest one-day organ, tissue, bone 
        marrow, and blood donation event; and
Whereas a number of businesses, foundations, health organizations, and the 
        Department of Health and Human Services have designated February 10, 
        2001, as National Donor Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) supports the goals and ideas of National Donor Day;
            (2) encourages all Americans to learn about the importance 
        of organ, tissue, bone marrow, and blood donation and to 
        discuss such donation with their families and friends; and
            (3) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling on the people of the United States to conduct 
        appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs to demonstrate 
        support for organ, tissue, bone marrow, and blood donation.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 7, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Status of State Plans for Sewage Sludge Incineration Emission Guidelines under the March 21, 2011 Rule

Update: 2/1/2014

This d ocum ent d oes no t est ab lish any new req uirem ent s and is not b ind ing or enf orceab le. It d o es not const it ut e f inal agency act ion

und er Clean Air Act sect ion 307(b )(1), 42 U.S.C. 7607(b )(1). Rat her, it is a “living d ocum en t ” t h at p rovid es a st at us up d at e of St at e Plan s, 

Negat ive Declarat ions, and Fed eral Plan Delegat ion f or t he March 21, 2011, Sew age Slud ge In cinerat ion Em issions Guid elines at 40 C.F.R p art 

60 sub p art MMMM, p ert ain ing t o rule im p lem ent at ion und er Sect ion 129 of t he Clean Air Act as am end ed in 1990.

 

EPA 

Region

State/Local 

Agency

Status TBD Draft State 

Plan 

Submitted

Final

State Plan 

Submitted

State Plan 

Approved

Negative 

Declaration 

Submitted (S) or 

Approved (A)

Federal Plan 

(Anticipated State 

Delegation of Federal 

Plan)

Region 1

Connecticut X

Maine S

Massachusetts X

New Hampshire X

Rhode Island X

Vermont S

Region 2

New Jersey X

New York X

Puerto Rico X

Virgin Islands X

Region 3

District of 

Columbia

S

Delaware S

Maryland X

Pennsylvania

Philadelphia 

County

Allegheny 

County

S

X

X

Virginia X

West Virginia S

Region 4

Alabama DEM

Huntsville

Jefferson 

County

X

X

S
 

EPA 

Region

State/Local 

Agency

Status TBD Draft State 

Plan 

Submitted

Final

State Plan 

Submitted

State Plan 

Approved

Negative 

Declaration 

Submitted (S) or 

Approved (A)

Federal Plan 

(Anticipated State 

Delegation of Federal 

Plan)

(Birmingham)

Florida X

Georgia X

Kentucky DNR

Jefferson 

County

(Louisville)

X

X

Mississippi X

North Carolina 

DNR

Forsyth County, 

NC

(WinstonSalem)

Mecklenburg 

County, NC

(Charlotte)

Buncombe 

County, NC 

(Asheville)

X

X

X

X

South Carolina X

Tennessee X

Region 5

Illinois X

Indiana X

Michigan X

Minnesota X

Ohio X

Wisconsin X

Region 6

Arkansas S

Louisiana X
 

EPA 

Region

State/Local 

Agency

Status TBD Draft State 

Plan 

Submitted

Final

State Plan 

Submitted

State Plan 

Approved

Negative 

Declaration 

Submitted (S) or 

Approved (A)

Federal Plan 

(Anticipated State 

Delegation of Federal 

Plan)

New MexicoCity of 

Albuquerque

S

New Mexico S

Oklahoma S

Texas S

Region 7

Iowa X

Kansas X

Missouri X

Nebraska S

Region 8

Colorado S

Montana X

North Dakota S

South Dakota S

Utah X

Wyoming S

Region 9

Arizona DEQ S

Maricopa 

County,AZ

X

Pima County, 

AZ

X

Pinal County, 

AZ

X

California X

Hawaii X

Nevada DEP X

Nevada- Clark 

County

X

Washoe 

County, NV

X

American 

Samoa

X

Guam X

Region 

10

Alaska X

Idaho S

Oregon X

Washington X