alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CROWELL & MORING LLP 1001 PENNSYLVANIAAVENUE, N.W.

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004-2595

TELEPHONE: (202) 624-2500

FACSIMILE: (202) 628·51 16

VIA EMAIL Mr. PaulL. Gretch Director Office ofInternational Aviation Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590 ZUCKERT, SCOUTT & RASENBERGER, L.L.P. 888 SEVENTEENTH STREET, N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006·3939 TELEPHONE: (202) 973·7926

FACSIMILE: (202) 342·0683 April27, 2015

Re: United/ANA- Notice ofAdditional Codesharing (Docket DOT-OST-2009-0344) Dear Mr. Gretch: Pursuant to the blanket statements ofauthorization granted to United1 and ANA, the carriers notify the Department ofthe display of the "UA

### *" designator code on flights operated by ANA between Tokyo (HND) and Hanoi (HAN) beginning on or after 30 days from the date ofthis letter. United and ANA hold the requisite underlying authority to codeshare on the Tokyo-Hanoi route? In addition, these services are fully consistent with the U.S.-Japan Open Skies Agreement and the U.S.-Vietnam Air Transport Agreement, as amended. Respectfully submitted, CROWELL & MORING LLP

Gerald F. Murphy Steven J. Seiden gmurphy(dkrowcll.com sseidenra)crowell.com 

### ---==·· ...... Counsel for United Airlines, Inc.

cc: Robert Finamore
Common names are used for airlines. ZUCKERT, SCOUTT & RASENBERGER, L.L.P. 

### /"j; ji ;1 () ·-. '



## __ c_

..**,_'-_-c:_b~_.,_.·_,,tf"-,;_. ----,:';::""~J"'-~~---~"**  **._'-:7~r"------'·=--·~·· -~/**  

### 5 T5 Charles J. Simpson David M. Endersbee Alexander T. Simpson _gj

**simpson@zsrla\y,~om** dmcndcrsbceta)zsrlaw.com atsimpson(i:j),zsrlaw.com Counsel for All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd.

2 See, e.g., Orders 2013-4-11 (reissuing United/Continental authorities in the name of "United Airlines, Inc.") and 2007-4-29 (ANA foreign air carrier permit); and Notices of Action Taken dated Aug. 7, 1998 (United/ANA) (Undocketed), Jan. 19, 2010 in this docket (Continental/ANA), and Sept. 17, 2014 in Docket DOT-OST-2004-19148 (United worldwide third country codesharing).

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that I have this date served the foregoing document onthe following persons in accordance with the Department's Rules ofPractice.

**robcrt.wiric~com** howard.kass@aa.com jhill@coolev.com perkmann(q!coolev.com sascha.vandcrbcllen@dclta.com

**~--.~~--·~~~" "::~-·--**  ...

**~~·........;** sametta.c.barnett(ci)dclta.com chris.walkeri(Ddelta.com nssparks@fedex.com

April27, 2015 sllunsford@fedcx.com gblcopoard(iV,fcdcx.com anita.mosner(a!,hklaw.com jennifer.nowak(c/),hklaw.com william.stallings@g;:;ch;)_LgQ...y dwight.moorc@ustranscom.mil

**john.s.duncan({~)faa.gov**
**Exhibit 10.39**

**2010 PERFORMANCE-BASED INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN**

**Purpose**

This 2010 Performance-BasedIncentive Plan (the “2010 Incentive Plan”) is being established by the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) inorder to tie a portion of an Eligible Employee’s compensation for 2010 to the Company’s financial performance. This 2010 Incentive Plan will be applicable to all employees of the Company, including all officers of vice president level andabove of the Company (each, an “Eligible Employee”). 

**Funding of 2010 Incentive Plan Pool**

The 2010 Incentive Plan will be funded based upon the Company’s financial performance for 2010, as measured by the Company’s 2010 adjustedEBITDA (“EBITDA”). Specifically, if the Company’s adjusted EBITDA exceeds a threshold percentage of the Company’s budgeted EBITDA (as established by the Compensation Committee), the amount of incentive compensation available tobe paid out pursuant to the 2010 Incentive Plan will increase by a specified percentage of the target pool amount (subject to a cap determined by the Committee). 

**Payment to Individual Employees**

Oncethe overall funding percentage is established, payments will be made to the Eligible Employees equal to the Eligible Employee’s targeted incentive compensation amount multiplied by the Funded Percentage; provided, however, that an EligibleEmployee’s overall incentive compensation for 2010 can be reduced by the Chief Executive Officer by up to 40%****based upon the individual’s overall performance and the Company’s performance on its Customer-Driven Focus andOperational Excellence goals (subject to approval by the Committee) . To be clear, in no event, however, will an Eligible Employee’s 2010 incentive compensation exceed the funded percentage based upon the Company’s adjusted EBITDA.Further, the Chief Executive Officer’s overall incentive compensation will also be subject to a 40% reduction using the same criteria as are used by the Chief Executive Officer for the other Eligible Employees; provided, however, that thedetermination of what percentage the Chief Executive Officer’s overall incentive compensation will be reduced by shall be subject to final approval by the Committee.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134246 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

ROBERT NARDI, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant- Justices Appellee, 

v SC: 134246 

 COA: 269197 

Marquette CC: 03-040723-CK 

SATELLITE SERVICES, INC.,

Defendant/Counter-PlaintiffAppellant, 

and 

WALLACE D. STEINHOFF and 

MICHAEL C. HENRICKSEN, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0917 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 24, 2007 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 313 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 313

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the crash of Transporte 
    Aereo Militar Ecuatoriano (TAME) Flight 120 on January 28, 2002.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 313

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas Transporte Aereo Militar Ecuatoriano (TAME) Flight 120 was en route from 
        Quito, Ecuador, to Tulcan, Ecuador, when it crashed in the Andes 
        mountains in Colombia on January 28, 2002;
Whereas the crash tragically killed an estimated 92 people;
Whereas the United States has strong cultural and historic ties to Ecuador and 
        Colombia;
Whereas the people of Ecuador and Colombia have already suffered greatly as a 
        result of the crash in the same region of another Ecuadorian aircraft on 
        January 17, 2002, which killed 26 people;
Whereas the civil aviation departments of Ecuador and Colombia are working in 
        concert to facilitate the recovery and identification of the passengers 
        and crew members of TAME Flight 120; and
Whereas professional emergency personnel from Ecuador and Colombia valiantly 
        overcame treacherous terrain and inclement weather to reach the site of 
        the crash and perform emergency services: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) sends its heartfelt condolences to the families, 
        friends, and loved ones of the victims of the crash of 
        Transporte Aereo Militar Ecuatoriano (TAME) Flight 120 on 
        January 28, 2002; and
            (2) commends the professional emergency personnel from 
        Ecuador and Colombia who responded to the tragic crash of TAME 
        Flight 120 with courage, determination, and skill.
    Sec. 2. The Clerk of the House of Representatives shall transmit an 
enrolled copy of this resolution to the President of Ecuador and to the 
President of Colombia.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 12, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
H. Con. Res. 28 Agreed to February 14, 2001

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the two Houses of Congress assemble in the Hall of

the House of Representatives on Tuesday, February 27, 2001, at

9 p.m., for the purpose of receiving such communication as the

President of the United States shall be pleased to make to them.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months period
      ended September 30, 2007 of the MACROshares Oil Down Tradeable Trust (the
      " **Registrant** "),
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      " **Quarterly**  **Report** "),
      I,
      John Flanagan, principal financial officer of MACRO Securities Depositor, LLC,
      which acts as the depositor for the Registrant (the " **Depositor** "),
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly represents,
                in all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
                of the
                Registrant.









Date:
      November 14, 2007








/s/
        John A. Flanagan
 John
      A.
      Flanagan


On
      behalf
      of the Registrant


and
      as
      Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David M. Sankaran, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc.



|                      |  |  |  |        |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 5, 2009 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/     DAVID M. SANKARAN                        
|                      |  |  |  | Name:  |  | David M. Sankaran                                
|                      |  |  |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                      |  |  |  |        |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 251

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 17, 2001

Mr. ARMEY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Wednesday, October 17, 2001, it stand ad4 journed until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, October 23, 2001,

5 for morning hour debate, or until Members are notified

6 to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent res7 olution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate

8 recesses or adjourns at the close of business on Wednes9 day, October 17, 2001, or Thursday, October 18, 2001,

10 on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution

11 by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed

12 or adjourned until 10 a.m. on Tuesday, October 23, 2001,

13 or at such other time on that day as may be specified by

14 its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess
2

•HCON 251 ATH

1 or adjourn, or until Members are notified to reassemble

2 pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, which3 ever occurs first.

4 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

5 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

6 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead7 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

8 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble at such place

9 and time as they may designate whenever, in their opinion,

10 the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
EXHIBIT 99(q)

                              Certifications


     This   certification   is   provided   pursuant   to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the
"Form  10-K")  for the year ended  December  31,  2002 of CRIIMI  MAE Inc.  (the
"Issuer").

     I, Cynthia O. Azzara, Chief Financial Officer,  certify that to the best of
my knowledge:

(i)      the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
         (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(ii)     the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Issuer.




March 28, 2003                          /s/Cynthia O. Azzara
---------------------------             -------------------------------------
DATE                                    Cynthia O. Azzara
                                        Senior Vice President,
                                        Chief Financial Officer and
                                        Treasurer
Amendment to Severance Agreement



 Exhibit 10.48 
  
 AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT 
  
 This Amendment (“Amendment”) is entered into between Bruce C. Edwards (“Employee”) and Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
(“Powerwave”) effective as of this 3rd day of May 2005. 
  
 Recitals: 
  

	 	A.	Employee and Powerwave are parties to a Severance Agreement entered into as of August 1, 2003 (“Agreement.”) 

  

	 	B.	Employee was the Chief Executive Officer of Powerwave at the time the Severance Agreement was executed. Employee is now the Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of
Powerwave. 

  

	 	C.	Employee and Powerwave desire to amend the Severance Agreement as set forth below. 

  
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above and the mutual covenants and conditions contained below, Employee and Powerwave agree as
follows: 
  

	1.	Employee and Powerwave agree that all references in the Severance Agreement to the term Chief Executive Officer are deleted and replaced with Executive Chairman of the Board as
Employee is presently the Executive Chairman of the Board and no longer the Chief Executive Officer. 

  

	2.	Except as provided herein, the terms and conditions of the Severance Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on the date indicated above.

  

									
	 “Executive Chairman of the Board”
	 	 	 	 “Company”

				
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Bruce C. Edwards
	 	 	 	 Powerwave Technologies, Inc.

	 Bruce C. Edwards
	 	 	 	 	 	 
					
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 By:
	 	 /s/ Andrew J. Sukawaty

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 Andrew J. Sukawaty, Chairman, Compensation

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 Committee
[Nos. 17375-1-II; 19485-6-II.

Division Two.

June 28, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Leonides Resendiz-Bravo, et al., *Appellants. In the Matter of the Personal Restraint Petition of*Jesus Resendiz-Bravo.

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 93-1-00226-0, Don L. McCulloch, J., entered July 20, 1993. *Affirmed in part*and petition *denied*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, J., concurred in by Seinfeld, C.J., and Morgan, J.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATION OF CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND PRESIDENT (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)     I, Ronald E. Weinberg, Chairman of the Board, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and President of Hawk Corporation, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K ofHawk Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;           (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report, based on such evaluation; and           (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and           (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:  March 30, 2005/s/ RONALD E. WEINBERG Ronald E. Weinberg*Chairman of the Board,**Chief Executive Officer and President*
76
Exhibit 15

November 7,
2008

GFI
Group Inc.
55 Water Street
New York, NY 10041

We
have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information of GFI Group Inc.
and subsidiaries for the periods ended September 30, 2008, and 2007, and have issued our report dated November 7, 2008. As indicated in our report, because we did not perform an audit,
we expressed no opinion on that information.

We
are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, is being
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-122905 and No. 333-152027 on Form S-8.

We
also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or
certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New
York, New York

---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2486

NAN S. VICK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FOOTE, INCORPORATED, t/a Foote Tire,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CA-95-151)

Submitted: November 30, 1995 Decided: April 12, 1996

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and MICHAEL, Circuit

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nan S. Vick, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Patrick Geary, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Vick v. Foote,

Inc., No. CA-95-151 (E.D. Va. Aug. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED