alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 442

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2002

Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the American Road and Transportation Builders 

Association for reaching its 100th Anniversary and for 

the many vital contributions of its members in the transportation construction industry to the American economy 

and quality of life through the multi-modal transportation infrastructure network its members have designed, 

built, and managed over the past century.

Whereas, founded in 1902 by Horatio Sawyer Earle, a visionary Michigan public official, the American Road and 

Transportation Builders Association is the Nation’s oldest national association exclusively representing the 

transportation construction industry; 

Whereas, for a century, the American Road and Transportation Builders Association has successfully advocated for
2

HCON 442 RFS 

strong Federal investment in transportation infrastructure, highlighted by the world’s greatest road network, 

the Dwight David Eisenhower System of Interstate and 

Defense Highways;

Whereas the transportation construction industry that the 

American Road and Transportation Builders Association 

represents works to constantly improve America’s transportation network, including our Nation’s roads, bridges, 

airports, mass transit systems, ports, and waterways that 

are the foundation on which the Nation’s economy stands 

and grows; 

Whereas the American Road and Transportation Builders Association incorporates educational, research, and charitable efforts to advance the transportation construction 

industry, improve transportation education, maintain the 

highest industry standards of excellence, and ensure the 

public health, safety, and welfare; and 

Whereas the multi-modal transportation infrastructure network that American Road and Transportation Association members have designed, built, and managed over the 

past century, in partnership with government at all levels, has made America’s economy the envy of the world 

and provided the American people with an unmatched 

quality of life: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) acknowledges the American Road and 

4 Transportation Builders Association for its 100th 

5 Anniversary; 
3

HCON 442 RFS 

1 (2) commends the many achievements of the 

2 transportation construction industry; and 

3 (3) encourages the American Road and Trans4 portation Builders Association to continue its tradi5 tion of excellence in service to the transportation 

6 construction industry and to the public.

Passed the House of Representatives September 9, 

2002. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 18295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7349]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7833]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition

    Determinations: ``Roy Lichtenstein: A Retrospective''
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Roy Lichtenstein: A Retrospective'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Art Institute 
of Chicago, Chicago, IL, from on or about May 16, 2012, until on or 
about September 3, 2012; The National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, 
from on or about October 14, 2012, until on or about January 6, 2013, 
and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, 
is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: March 20, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-7349 Filed 3-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
**Exhibit 15.3**

 

IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm’s Consent

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in this Shell Company Report of Prenetics Global Limited on Form 20-F of our reportdated March 4, 2022, whichincludes an explanatory paragraph as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, with respect to our audit ofthe financial statements of Artisan Acquisition Corp. as of December 31,2021 and for the period from February 2, 2021 (inception) throughDecember 31, 2021, which report appears in the F-4 Registration Statement (File No. 333-260928). We also consent to thereference to our firm under the heading “Statement by Experts” in the Shell Company Report on Form 20-F.

 

/s/ Marcum llp

 

Marcum llp

Boston, MA

May 27, 2022
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick Bratton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 5, 2010



/s/ Patrick BrattonPatrick BrattonChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this Report.
#### Wanda CASBY v. AURORA COUNTRY CLUB and U.S. Insurance Group.

No. 87-C-0904.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 19, 1987.

In re Casby, Wanda; applying for reconsideration of writ of certiorari and/or review not considered on May 29, 1987, 506 So.2d 1219, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-6212; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “A”, No. 83-14399.

Writ denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0510

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

ALAN EDWIN ERICKSON,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Kathy Seeley, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 28 2024

02/28/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0510
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-1066

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM050AD

A300-57-0254 --- 6/4/10

A300-57-6110 --- 6/7/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 393 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 393

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Nation should take additional 
    steps to ensure the prevention of teen pregnancy by engaging in 
  measures to educate teenagers as to why they should stop and think 
  about the negative consequences before engaging in premature sexual 
                               activity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2002

 Mrs. Clayton (for herself, Mr. Castle, Ms. Pryce of Ohio, Mr. Towns, 
Mr. Shays, and Mr. Camp) submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress that the Nation should take additional 
    steps to ensure the prevention of teen pregnancy by engaging in 
  measures to educate teenagers as to why they should stop and think 
  about the negative consequences before engaging in premature sexual 
                               activity.

Whereas 4 in 10 girls in the United States will become pregnant before the age 
        of 20;
Whereas childbearing by teenagers costs taxpayers at least $7,000,000,000 each 
        year in direct costs associated with health care, foster care, criminal 
        justice, and public assistance;
Whereas the United States has the highest rates of teenage pregnancy and birth 
        in the industrialized world;
Whereas more than half of all mothers on welfare had their first child as a 
        teenager;
Whereas 80 percent of births to teenagers are to unmarried teenagers, and 
        teenage mothers have more children, on average, than women who delay 
        childbearing, which makes it more difficult for them and their children 
        to escape a life of poverty;
Whereas teenagers who give birth are less likely to complete high school and to 
        go on to college, thereby reducing their potential for economic self-
        sufficiency; and
Whereas the children of teenage mothers are more likely to be born prematurely 
        and at low birth-weight, and suffer from higher rates of abuse and 
        neglect than other children: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the Nation should take additional 
steps to ensure the prevention of teen pregnancy by engaging in 
measures to educate teenagers as to why they should stop and think 
about the negative consequences before engaging in premature sexual 
activity.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20381-20382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8024]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER12-1359-000]


Alliance NYGT, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Alliance NYGT, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is April 17, 2012.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.

[[Page 20382]]

    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d69093849599b8babfb8b385a3a6a6b9a4a296b0b3a4b5f8b1b9a0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="074142554448696b6e696254727777687573476162756429606871">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: March 28, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8024 Filed 4-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 23.2

         Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors
Ramtron International Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
registration statements of Ramtron International Corporation of our
report dated February 12, 2007, with respect to the consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income, stockholders' equity,
and cash flows of Ramtron International Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2006, and the related financial statement schedule, which
report appears in the December 31, 2008, annual report on Form 10-K of
Ramtron International Corporation.


Form     Registration Statement       Description
----     ----------------------       ---------------------------------
S-8            333-12265              Stock Option Plan
S-8            333-33554              Stock Option Plan
S-8            333-60594              Stock Option Plan
S-8            333-66252              Stock Option Plan
S-3            333-19119              Resale Registration Statement
                                      including shares issuable upon
                                      exercise of  warrants
S-3            333-128653             Shares issued upon acquisition of
                                      Goal Semiconductor, Inc.
S-3            333-87404              Shares issuable upon exercise of
                                      debenture warrants and other warrants
S-8            333-133760             Stock Option Plan
S-3            333-139478             Resale Registration including
                                      shares issuable upon exercise of
                                      warrants
S-3            333-151373             Resale Registration including
                                      shares issuable upon exercise of
                                      warrants

Our report on the consolidated financial statements referred to above
refers to Ramtron International Corporation's adoption of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, effective
January 1, 2006.


/s/ KPMG LLP
------------
KPMG LLP
Denver, Colorado
January 29, 2009
#### William T. Simmons *et al.,*Plaintiffs in Error, v. Hanne Brothers, Defendants in Error.

En Banc.

Writ of Error to Circuit Court, Duval county; Rhydon M. Call, Judge

*Geo. U. Walker*and *A. H.*King, for Plaintiffs in Error.

*A. W. Cockrell*J* *Son.*for Defendants in Error.

*419This action was brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error. There was judgment for the defendant and the plaintiff takes writ of error. It appearing to the court that no assignment of errors was presented to the judge at the time of the presentation or settlement of the bill of exceptions, the writ of error is dismissed.
From: Mason, Steve 

Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 8:48AM 

To: Belke, Jim <Belke.Jim@epa.gov> 

Subject: RE: Emergency planning coordination meetings 

The ones I have gone to in the past, the actual meeting time was probably a little shorter (around 3 hours), but if you 

add in the travel times to and from meetings, etc., the facility and locals would say the time commitment is probably 

close to 4 hours on average ... so 4 hours should be reasonable ... 

And yes, this is based on going to many, many coordination meetings between facil ities and communities (either preplanning) or even the after action reviews after an incident where the discussions were on the prior releases and preplanning for future events ... 

Stc:phc:n Ma3-0n 

I!PA Rc:gion 6 (6SI'.PI!I 

144S Ross Av<>nuc:, Dall;:ss1 TX 75202 

214·66$.227 6 

m;~:~on .. ::stc:vc:tlc:p:a.gov 

"'FI"'QUOI\Uy, nUl U•o<>e~l\& ~ bofOd .... ~Walk 

ciO\Itio,. ro tt'f/ lni)Utt\.. OtiOft. tN• & ~bad 1hlna · 

From: Belke, Jim 

Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 7:41AM 

To: Mason, Steve 

Subject: Emergency planning coordination meetings 

Hi Steve - I have a couple of quick questions for you relating to the emergency planning coordination provision in the 

proposed rule. In the Reg Impacts Analysis for the RMP NPRM, we estimate the unit costs of the annual coordination 

meeting to entai l an average of 4 hours of facility management time. That would be an average across all categories of 

facilities- so obviously more for larger, complex facilities, but less for very simple facilities. I am not sure but I vaguely 

remember a discussion where we concluded that a half day meeting was probably a reasonable average. 

So, my questions are: 

Thanks! 

Jim 

Does that sound to you like a reasonable average estimate for an annual coordination meeting? 

If so, can we say that this is based on EPA's experience with participating in actual coordination meetings 

between facilities and local responders? My recollection is that you have done this sort of thing a bunch of 

times, but I thought I'd check with you on it.
50456.

#### DREW v. HAGY.

Submitted April 7, 1975

Decided May 15, 1975.

*Drew & Jones, Jack B. Drew, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Hendon, Egerton, Harrison & Glean, E. T. Hendon, Jr.,*for appellee.

Bell, Chief Judge.

In this case plaintiff served interrogatories on defendant. Fifty-six days after service defendant answered some and specifically objected to six of those unanswered. Defendant sought no extension of time in which to answer or object. Plaintiff filed a motion to compel answers. The trial court sustained the objections to the six interrogatories and ordered defendant to answer the balance. Plaintiff appeals from this order under a certificate for immediate review. *Held:*

CPA § 33 (a) requires that answers and objections are to be served within 30 days after service of the interrogatories except that a defendant cannot be required to serve answers or objections within 45 days after service of the summons and complaint on him. (Code Ann. § 81A-133 (a)). Failure to file timely objections to the interrogatories is a waiver of the right to object. *Aetna Life Ins. v. Greene,*116 Ga. App. 783, 788 (159 SE2d 87); Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 2173. Thus the defendant waived his right to object and the trial court had no alternative but to grant plaintiffs motion to compel answers to all interrogatories. It was error to sustain the objections to the six interrogatories and not order them answered. We reverse with direction that the trial court enter an order compelling defendant to answer all interrogatories.

*Reversed with direction.*

*Webb and Marhsall, JJ., concur.*
[No. 35597-0-I.

Division One.

June 10, 1996.]

#### The City of Seattle, *Respondent,*v. Bruce Blume, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 93-2-17834-4, Sally Phillips Pasette, J., entered October 17, 1994. *Affirmed and remanded*by unpublished opinion per Agid, J., concurred in by Webster and Becker, JJ.