alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONBY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Frederick F. Wolfe, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)         evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)          disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)          all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)         anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date:  November 10, 2004

 

 
| /s/ Frederick F. Wolfe  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Frederick F. Wolfe      |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

POLYPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Polypore International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Robert B. Toth, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|Date: May 10, 2007 |  | /s/ROBERT B. TOTH                                   
|------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | Robert B. Toth
President and Chief Executive Officer

---



QuickLinks
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 50535 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

–

Appellee ,

v ersus
ALBERTO MONSIVAIS

- ALMENDAR , Defendant

– Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:15

- CR

- 8

- 1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, AND HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Alberto Monsivais

- Almendar has

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 11, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-50535 Document: 00513416229 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/2016No. 15

- 50535

2 moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Monsivais

- Almendar h a s no t filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-50535 Document: 00513416229 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/11/2016
RECEIVED 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

AUG 2 2 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

Michael P. Huerta, Administrator, 

Federal Aviation Administration, 

Complainant, 

v. 

GRANDE AVIATION, LLC 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2013CE190010 

Judge: Not yet assigned 

Hearing Date: Not yet assigned 

Hearing Location: Not yet assigned 

Respondent's Answer to Complaint 

Respondent Grande Aviation, LLC, by and through undersigned counsel, responds to the 

Administrator's Complaint as follows: 

1. Respondent admits the allegations in Section I of the Complaint, noting that the 

Final Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty was dated July 24,2014. 

2. Respondent admits the allegations in Section II, paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of the 

Complaint. 

3. Respondent denies the allegations in Section II, paragraph 4 of tliei,<:;omplaint. ·, ' ~.;_.,;,i 

\.o; ·-·.ii':j',,·-:'<,;, 

4. Respondent denies the allegations in Section III, paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 6ftl'ie' 

Complaint. 

KentS. Jackson, Esq. 

Jackson & Wade, L.L.C. 

21628 Midland Dr. 

Shawnee, KS 66218 

Tel: 913.338.1700 

Fax: 913.338.1755 

1 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document on the following parties' 

counsel or designated representatives at the address indicated by Federal Express to the 

following addresses: 

Original and one copy: 

One Copy: 

Dated: August 21,2014 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Room 2014 

600 Independence Ave. SW 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Gayle E. Townsend, Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel- ACE-7 

Central Region 

901 Locust, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

~~-- Ke; S. Jackson, Esq. 

Jackson & Wade, L.L.C. 

21628 Midland Dr. 

Shawnee, KS 66218 

Tel: 913.338.1700 

Fax: 913.338.1755 

2
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
    
    the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Alan LiptonAlan LiptonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Order entered December 21, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00466-CR

COREY ARLYN SMITH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-82354-2014

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s December 19, 2016 motion to extend time to file 

appellant’s brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed January 19, 2017.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 25, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-20302

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHN DAVID WILEY, III

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:04-CR-442-10

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Wiley, a pharmacist, is on trial in the Southern District

of Texas, charged with offenses relating to the unlawful distribution of controlled substances through a pharmacy named I-10 East

Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. On motion of the Government, Wiley’s

release on bond pending trial was revoked after the court heard

evidence that Wiley continues to engage in the conduct for which he

has been indicted.

On appeal, absent an error of law, this court must affirm

the district court’s order revoking bond and detaining Wiley
2

pending trial if the order “is supported by the proceedings below.”

The statute states that, “If there is probable cause to believe

that, while on release, the person committed a Federal . . .

felony, a rebuttable presumption arises that no condition or

combination of conditions will assure that the person will not pose

a danger to the safety of any other person in the community.” 18

U.S.C. § 3148(B).

Wiley offered no evidence challenging the testimony of

Inspector Callahan that Wiley has continued to dispense dosages of

hydrocodone in amounts far in excess of usual medical practice,

under conditions that suggested dispensation for non-medical

reasons. Wiley’s appeal does not challenge the evidence, but

instead simply disagrees with the legal characterization of his

conduct, i.e., with the characterization of the conduct for which

he is also now on trial. We express no opinion on the ultimate

legal issues. The district court’s order, in any event, is fully

supported by the record.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 354 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 139
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 354

                          [Report No. 107-401]

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2002

 Mr. LaTourette (for himself and Mr. Costello) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

                             April 11, 2002

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL 
              OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN.

    On June 7, 2002, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the 
Senate may jointly designate, the 2002 District of Columbia Special 
Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred to as 
the ``event'') may be run through the Capitol Grounds as part of the 
journey of the Special Olympics torch to the District of Columbia 
Special Olympics summer games at Gallaudet University in the District 
of Columbia.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946 (40 
U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, advertisements, displays, 
and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions 
applicable to the Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.

                                                 House Calendar No. 139

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 354

                          [Report No. 107-401]

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 11, 2002

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20399-20400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8072]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Interest Rate on Overdue Debts

    Section 30.18 of the Department of Health and Human Services' 
claims collection regulations (45 CFR part 30) provides that the 
Secretary shall charge an annual rate of interest, which is

[[Page 20400]]

determined and fixed by the Secretary of the Treasury after considering 
private consumer rates of interest on the date that the Department of 
Health and Human Services becomes entitled to recovery. The rate cannot 
be lower than the Department of Treasury's current value of funds rate 
or the applicable rate determined from the ``Schedule of Certified 
Interest Rates with Range of Maturities'' unless the Secretary waives 
interest in whole or part, or a different rate is prescribed by 
statute, contract, or repayment agreement. The Secretary of the 
Treasury may revise this rate quarterly. The Department of Health and 
Human Services publishes this rate in the Federal Register.
    The current rate of 10\7/8\%, as fixed by the Secretary of the 
Treasury, is certified for the quarter ended September 30, 2011. This 
interest rate is effective until the Secretary of the Treasury notifies 
the Department of Health and Human Services of any change.

    Dated: March 28, 2012.
Margie Yanchuk,
Director, Office of Financial Policy and Reporting.
[FR Doc. 2012-8072 Filed 4-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-04-P
EXHIBIT 31.1

Rule 13a  14(a)/15(d) 
14(a)

I, William Marshall, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report
on Form 10-QSB of Cascade Energy Inc.;

2.Based on my
knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this annual report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this annual report;

4. The registrants other certifying
officers and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the Evaluation Date); and c) presented in this annual report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. The registrants other
certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant
deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal controls; and 6. The registrants other
certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not
there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 23, 2006/s/ William MarshallWilliam
MarshallChief Executive
Officer

---
```

[Senate Hearing 114-158]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                                 S. HRG. 114-158
                                                 

 
                THE ADMINISTRATION'S QUADRENNIAL ENERGY 
                             REVIEW (QER) 
________________________________________________________________

                                HEARING 

                              BEFORE THE 

                             COMMITTEE ON 

                     ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES 

                        UNITED STATES SENATE 

                    ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS 

                             FIRST SESSION 

         THE ADMINISTRATION'S QUADRENNIAL ENERGY REVIEW (QER) 

                                ________

                            APRIL 28, 2015 

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

                         Printed for the use of the 
               Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

                                  ______

                         U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 

95-272                         WASHINGTON : 2016 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing 
  Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; 
         DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, 
                          Washington, DC 20402-0001

[TEXT NOT AVAILABLE]
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6741

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. GUISEPPE L. WALLACE, a/k/a Big, a/k/a Big Joe, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Thomas E. Johnston, District Judge. (5:02-cr-00101-1; 5:04-cv-01152) Submitted: September 11, 2008 Decided: September 16, 2008 Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Guiseppe L. Wallace, Appellant Pro Se. John Lanier File, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Guiseppe L. Wallace seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wallace has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED