alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 259 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 259

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2001

Received and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 
                                Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the relief efforts 
  undertaken by charitable organizations and the people of the United 
  States in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks against the United 
              States that occurred on September 11, 2001.

Whereas the people of the United States have a long and honorable tradition of 
        assisting individuals, families, and communities in need;
Whereas charitable organizations play a vital role in delivering services to 
        individuals and families that are in need of relief;
Whereas charitable organizations are providing relief to the victims of the 
        terrorist attacks against the United States that occurred on September 
        11, 2001, and their families;
Whereas the people of the United States have been extremely generous in 
        contributing to charitable organizations that provide relief to the 
        victims of the terrorist attacks and their families; and
Whereas more than $1,000,000,000 has been collected for charitable work related 
        to the terrorist attacks: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) praises the people of the United States for their 
        patriotism and generosity in donating their money, time, and 
        blood to support the victims of the terrorist attacks against 
        the United States that occurred on September 11, 2001, and 
        their families;
            (2) commends charitable organizations for their hard work 
        in providing needed assistance to the individuals and families 
        who have been affected by the terrorist attacks;
            (3) urges charitable organizations to use the money 
        collected from the people of the United States for the purposes 
        for which the money was donated, and to limit the extent to 
        which such money is used for administrative costs; and
            (4) condemns individuals and groups that fraudulently use 
        contributions for objectives unrelated to the purpose for which 
        the contributions were made.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
exv10w5



 






EXHIBIT 10.5




NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION




Effective July 18, 2005




	 	 	 	 	 
	BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEES
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Quarterly Retainer
	 	$	1,750.00	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Meetings (Attended in person)
	 	$	2,000.00	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Meetings (Attended telephonically)
	 	$	750.00	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Chair Fee:
	 	$	250.00	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	COMMITTEE CHAIR FEES
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee
	 	$	1,250.00	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Compensation Committee
	 	$	1,250.00	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Nomination & Governance Committee
	 	$	500.00	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	COMMITTEE MEMBER FEES
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee
	 	$	1,000.00	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Compensation Committee
	 	$	1,000.00	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Nomination & Governance Committee
	 	$	1,000.00	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	CHAIR FEES ARE FOR IN-PERSON OR TELEPHONIC ATTENDANCE
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT FEE
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Each Consent (Board or Committee)
	 	$	750.00
### AWS-~IN. **TEXAS** 

### 78711 September 5, 1973 Honorable Ken Andrew8 County Attorney Young County Graham, Texas
Dear Mr. Andrews: Opinion No. H- 95 Re: Whether probation fee may be collected from persons placed onprobation after conviction fdi misdemeanor You have requested the opinion of this office on two questions:

“1. Whether the person placed on probation under a misdemeanor can be made to pay a probation fee of not more than $10.00 per month? 

### "2. Who collects the probation fee? ” You comment that:

“Under Article 42.12 the felony probation .law, the District Judge may assess a probation fee not to exceed $10.00 per month as a term of the probation. “We are unable. to find any authority under which a misdemeanor defendant who has been placed onprobation can be made to pay a probation fee. I’ Article 42.13 ofthe Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the Misdemeanor Probation Law, does not contain any provision for charging a misdemeanor defendant a supervisory or probation fee. However, $5 6(a) and ,l2, respectively, ofArticle 42.12 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, theAdult Probation and Parole Law, provide:

p. 439The Honorable Ken Andrews, page 2 (H-95)

“Sec. 6a. (a) A court granting probation may fix afee not exceeding $10per month to be paid to the court by the probationer during the probationary period. The court may make payment of the fee a condition of granting or continuing the orobation.

‘I. . .

“Sec. 12. The provisions ofSections 6a. 10, and 11of this Article also apply toArticle 42.13. ” The above provision of 012ofArticle 42.12 authorizes charging a probation or supervisory fee to a misdemeanor defendant who has been placed onprobation, ifthe court so directs. Attorney General’s Opinion C:64g holds to the contrary; however this opinion was written befo.re the enactment of the above sections 6a(a) and 12ofArticle 42.12. Inanswer to your second question, $6a(a) provides that the fee is
“to be paid to the court by the probationer” and $6a(b) provides that “the court shall distribute the fees [in the matter provided]“. Itis our opinion, therefore, that the fee is to be collected by the court or at least under the court’s direction. SUMMARY

The court may direct the payment of aprobation fee of a misdemeanor defendant who has been placed onprobation, such fee to be collected by or under the direction ofthe court. Very truly yours, A
L. HILL Attorney General of Texas

p. 440The Honorab,le Ken Andrews. page 3 (H-95)

APPROVED:

DAVID M. KENDALL, Chairdan Opinion Committee

p. ,441
Order entered July 31 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05 - 15 - 00664 - CV LUIS A. SANTIAGO, Appellant V. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO JPMORGAN

CHASE BANK, AS TRUST EE FOR NOVASTAR MORT GAGE FUNDI NG TRUST, SERIES 2004
- 2. NOVASTAR HOME EQU ITY LOAN ASSET
- BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004 - 2, AND OCWEN LOAN SE RVICING, LLC, Appellee s On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296
- 01232 - 2015 

### O RDER
The Co urt GRANTS appellees’ July 30, 2015 unopposed motion for a fourteen

- day extension of time to file their brief. We ORDER appellees to file their brief by MONDAY, AUGUST 17, 2015 . Because this is an accelerated appeal, no further extensions will be granted absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laycor Ventures Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Robert Wayne Morgan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |    

Dated this 14th day of August, 2007.

ROBERT WAYNE MORGANRobert Wayne MorganChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer








































---
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 360 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 360

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 21, 2002

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives 
         and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Wednesday, March 
20, 2002, or Thursday, March 21, 2002, on a motion offered pursuant to 
this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee,

it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, April 9, 2002, or until 
Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate 
recesses or adjourns at the close of business on Thursday, March 21, 
2002, Friday, March 22, 2002, or Saturday, March 23, 2002, on a motion 
offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader 
or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, 
April 8, 2002, or at such other time on that day as may be specified in 
the motion to recess or adjourn, or until Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble at 
such place and time as they may designate whenever, in their opinion, 
the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 20, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 10.9(b)


 Schedule of Secured Convertible Notes (refinancings) Issued by NCT Group, Inc.
             to Carole Salkind and Outstanding as of August 15, 2005



                                                                Conversion
    Issue Date         Due Date             Principal              Price
    ----------         --------        -------------------         -----
     02/21/05          08/21/05        $     457,761.83           $0.0195
     03/11/05          09/11/05              457,201.55           $0.0180
     03/23/05          09/23/05            2,001,439.22           $0.0183
     04/14/05          10/14/05              457,970.18           $0.0130
     04/29/05          10/29/05            1,034,532.52           $0.0120
     05/18/05          11/18/05              485,934.02           $0.0123
     06/10/05          12/10/05            1,465,534.55           $0.0100
     07/08/05          01/08/06           27,129,266.96           $0.0120
     08/01/05          02/08/06           13,349,878.22           $0.0101
     08/10/05          02/10/06           18,681,625.40           $0.0100
                                       -------------------
                                       $  65,521,144.45
                                       ===================
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 9, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00533

- CV

Oscar Leo QUINTANILLA

, Appellant

v.

Andrew Bradford WEST

, Appellee

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- CI

- 06259

Honorable David A . Canales, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The appellee ’ s unopposed motion for leave to file post submission brief is hereby

GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED on Feb ruary 9, 2017

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1195

MARCOS ANTONIO SANTOS-GARCIA,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: September 28, 2020 Decided: October 5, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, KING, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patricia B. Minikon, MINIKON LAW, LLC, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Petitioner. Joseph 

H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Stephen J. Flynn, Assistant Director, Jeffrey R. 

Meyer, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Marcos Antonio Santos-Garcia, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for 

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal 

from the immigration judge’s decision denying Santos-Garcia’s applications for asylum, 

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

We have considered Santos-Garcia’s claims after thoroughly reviewing the record and 

conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency's 

factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence supports the 

Board’s decision, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). In particular, we 

conclude that substantial evidence supports the finding that Santos-Garcia failed to show

that the El Salvadoran government was unable or unwilling to protect him from the local 

gang. We also conclude that there was no error in the Board’s finding that Santos-Garcia’s 

proposed social group of persons who oppose gangs in El Salvador is not cognizable or 

that Santos-Garcia failed to establish that he was targeted on account of an imputed 

political opinion.*

 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. 

See In re Santos-Garcia (B.I.A. Jan. 22, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because 

* Santos-Garcia does not challenge the denial of protection under the CAT in his 

brief. Thus, this issue is waived. See Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(8)(A); Suarez-Valenzuela v. 

Holder, 714 F.3d 241, 248-49 (4th Cir. 2013) (noting issues not raised in appellate brief 

are abandoned). 
3

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 354 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 354

 Amending paragraphs 2 and 3(a) of Rule XXV and providing for certain 
appointments to the Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee, the 
 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, the Finance Committee, 
   the Small Business Committee, and the Veterans' Affairs Committee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 12, 2000

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Amending paragraphs 2 and 3(a) of Rule XXV and providing for certain 
appointments to the Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee, the 
 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, the Finance Committee, 
   the Small Business Committee, and the Veterans' Affairs Committee.

    Resolved, That notwithstanding any other provision of Rule XXV, 
paragraph 2 of Rule XXV of the Standing Rules of the Senate is amended 
as follows:
    Strike the figure after ``Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry'' 
and insert in lieu thereof ``20''.
    Strike the figure after ``Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs'' and 
insert in lieu thereof ``22''.
    Sec. 2. That Rule XXV, paragraph 3(a) of the Standing Rules of the 
Senate is amended as follows:
    Strike the figure after ``Veterans' Affairs'' and insert in lieu 
thereof ``14''.
    Sec. 3. That on the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and 
Forestry, the Senator from Oregon (Mr. Smith) is hereby appointed to 
serve as a majority member; that the Senator from Georgia (Mr. Miller) 
is hereby appointed to serve as a minority member; and that the 
Majority Leader is hereby authorized to appoint one majority member of 
that committee.
    Sec. 4. That on the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 
Affairs, the Senator from Georgia (Mr. Miller) is hereby appointed to 
serve as a minority member, and that the Majority Leader is hereby 
authorized to appoint one majority member to that committee.
    Sec. 5. That on the Committee on Finance, the Senator from Idaho 
(Mr. Craig) is hereby appointed to serve as a majority member.
    Sec. 6. That on the Committee on Small Business, the Majority 
Leader is hereby authorized to appoint one majority member to that 
committee.
    Sec. 7. That on the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, the Senator 
from Georgia (Mr. Miller) is hereby appointed to serve as a minority 
member, and that the Majority Leader is hereby authorized to appoint a 
majority member to that committee.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered April 7, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00963-CR

AURORA SONANO REYES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2-17-0510

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s April 3, 2020 second motion for extension of 

time to file its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief due on or 

before April 17, 2020.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE
[No. 36838-9-I.

Division One.

July 8, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Syeve Jarmaine Richardson, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-1-07674-1, Kathleen Learned, J., entered May 30, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Exhibit 32




      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT FOF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Michael H. Lee,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Francis M. Colalucci,
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
and 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and


         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/  Michael H. Lee
----------------------------
Michael H. Lee
President and Chief Executive Officer

August 3, 2007




/s/  Francis M. Colalucci
----------------------------
Francis M. Colalucci
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

August 3, 2007


                                       38
EX-10.1 SUMMARY OF CASH INCENTIVE COMPENSATION



 








Exhibit 10.1




SUMMARY OF CASH INCENTIVE COMPENSATION CRITERIA





     On March 29, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved total revenue
and net income targets and calculation parameters for purposes of determining cash incentive
compensation payments to be made to certain of its executive officers for the 2005 fiscal year.
The previously determined target cash incentive amount payable to the registrant’s Chief Executive
Officer is 52% of the officer’s base salary, and the target cash incentive amounts payable to the
registrant’s other eligible senior executive officers range from 33% to 42.5% of the officer’s base
salary. These amounts will be payable in full in the event the registrant achieves the revenue
and net income targets set by the Compensation Committee. Performance above or below these targets
(but above specified minimum performance levels) will result in greater or lesser incentive
compensation ranging from 75% to 115% of the officer’s target cash incentive amount. The criteria
approved by the Committee give equal weight to the registrant’s net income and revenue goals,
provided that no cash incentive payment will be made under these criteria in the event the
registrant’s net income for fiscal 2005 falls below a specified threshold amount. Notwithstanding
the establishment of these criteria, the registrant’s Board of Directors retains the discretion to
award other or additional incentive compensation to its senior officers based on the achievement of
such financial or other objectives as it determines to be appropriate.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**





**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**





**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Hawk Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
      10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph J. Levanduski,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
      JOSEPH J. LEVANDUSKI


Joseph
      J.
      Levanduski


*Chief
      Financial Officer*





March
      29,
      2006





This
      certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the
      knowledge standard contained in that statute, and not for any other
      purpose.

























































88