alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 219

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding United States policy toward

Taiwan’s membership in international organizations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 6, 2001

Mr. SCHAFFER (for himself, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. WYNN, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr.

CRANE, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. WEXLER, Mr.

CHABOT, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr.

SOUDER, Mr. HILLIARD, Mr. HEFLEY, and Mr. UNDERWOOD) submitted

the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding United States

policy toward Taiwan’s membership in international organizations.

Whereas Taiwan has dramatically improved its record on

human rights and routinely holds free and fair elections

in a multiparty system, as evidenced most recently by

Taiwan’s second democratic presidential election of

March 18, 2000, in which Mr. Chen Shui-bian was elected as President;

Whereas the 23,000,000 people on Taiwan are not represented in the United Nations and their human rights

as citizens of the world are therefore severely abridged;
2

•HCON 219 IH

Whereas Taiwan has in recent years repeatedly expressed its

strong desire to join the United Nations and other international organizations;

Whereas the world community has reacted positively to Taiwan’s desire for international participation, as shown by

Taiwan’s membership in the Asian Development Bank,

Taiwan’s admission to the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation group as a full member, and Taiwan’s anticipated membership in the World Trade Organization;

Whereas Taiwan, as evidenced in the preceding provisions of

the preamble, possesses ample resources and creativity to

contribute to the work and funding of the United Nations

and its affiliate organizations such as the World Bank

and the International Monetary Fund, and would benefit

from membership in these organizations; and

Whereas Public Law 106–137 required the Secretary of State

to submit a report to the Congress on the efforts of the

State Department to support Taiwan’s participation in

international organizations: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) Taiwan and its 23,000,000 people deserve

4 full and equal membership in the United Nations

5 and other international organizations; and

6 (2) the United States should take a leading role

7 in gaining international support for Taiwan’s par8 ticipation in these organizations.

Æ
#### Joey Dale BEAM v. STATE.

8 Div. 424.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

July 28, 1987.

F. David Lowery and Benjamin H. Rich-ey, Russellville, for appellant.

Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Gerrilyn V. Grant, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

ON REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

McMillan, judge.

In accordance with the Alabama Supreme Court’s decision in *Ex Parte Beam,*512 So.2d 723 (Ala.1987), this cause is hereby remanded to the trial court for a new trial.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the Judges concur.
International Energy Outlook 2009

Report #: DOE/EIA-0484(2009)

Release Date: May 2009

(full report available August 2009)

Next Release Date: May 2010

Table F6. Delivered Energy Consumption in OECD Europe by End-Use Sector and Fuel, 2006-2030

(Quadrillion Btu)

Sector/Fuel Projections

2006 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Residential

 Liquids 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3

 Natural Gas 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.9

 Coal 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3

 Electricity 3.0 3.5 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.4

 Renewables 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

 Total 11.5 11.7 12.0 12.3 12.6 12.8

Commercial

 Liquids 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8

 Natural Gas 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1

 Coal 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

 Electricity 2.8 3.2 3.4 3.7 3.9 4.1

 Renewables 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

 Total 5.7 6.0 6.2 6.5 6.8 7.0

Industrial

 Liquids 10.6 9.7 9.6 9.8 9.9 10.1

 Natural Gas 6.6 6.6 6.8 6.9 7.1 7.2

 Coal 3.8 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.9

 Electricity 4.6 4.8 5.1 5.4 5.6 5.8

 Renewables 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3

 Total 25.8 24.8 25.0 25.5 25.9 26.2

Transportation

 Liquids 17.4 16.2 16.4 17.0 17.1 17.2

 Natural Gas 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

 Coal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

 Electricity 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3

 Total 17.8 16.5 16.7 17.4 17.5 17.6

All End-Use Sectors

 Liquids 31.6 29.1 29.0 30.0 30.2 30.3

 Natural Gas 13.8 13.9 14.2 14.5 14.9 15.2

 Coal 4.4 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.3

 Electricity 10.7 11.7 12.6 13.4 14.0 14.5

 Renewables 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3

 Delivered Energy 60.8 59.0 59.9 61.7 62.8 63.6

 Electricity-Related Losses /a 20.8 23.2 24.9 26.2 27.3 28.2

 Total 81.6 82.2 84.8 87.9 90.0 91.8

Electric Power /b

 Liquids 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8

 Natural Gas 5.9 7.0 7.9 8.7 9.3 9.6

 Coal 8.7 9.0 9.0 8.8 8.7 8.8
 Nuclear 9.8 9.7 9.7 9.6 9.5 9.5

 Renewables 6.4 8.3 10.0 11.6 13.0 14.1

 Total 32.0 34.9 37.5 39.5 41.3 42.7

Total Energy Consumption

 Liquids 32.4 30.0 29.9 30.8 31.0 31.1

 Natural Gas 19.7 21.0 22.1 23.3 24.2 24.8

 Coal 13.2 13.0 12.8 12.4 12.2 12.0

 Nuclear 9.6 9.7 9.7 9.6 9.5 9.5

 Renewables 6.6 8.5 10.3 11.9 13.3 14.4

 Total 81.6 82.2 84.8 87.9 90.0 91.8

a/ Electricity losses incurred in the transmission and distribution of electric power. May include some heat production.

b/ Fuel inputs used in the production of electricity and heat at central-station generators.

Sources: 2006: Derived from Energy Information Administration (EIA), International Energy Annual 2006 (June-December 2008

www.eia. doe.gov/iea. Projections: EIA, World Energy Projections Plus (2009).
-0.5

0.4

-2.0

1.5

—

0.5

-0.8

0.4

-1.6

1.6

—

0.9

-0.2

0.4

-1.1

1.0

0.1

0.1

-0.1

1.4

—

0.1

0.0

-0.2

0.4

-1.3

1.3

0.1

0.2

1.3

0.5

-0.5

2.0

0.0

Average Annual Percent 

Change, 2006-2030
-0.1

3.4

1.2

-0.2

1.0

-0.4

-0.1

3.3

0.5

me heat production.

al 2006 (June-December 2008), web site
exv10w1



 





Exhibit 10.1




NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION




Toronto,
March 1, 2005


Mr. Lynton (Red) Wilson

Chairman of the Board

Nortel Networks Corporation

8200 Dixie Road, Suite 100

Brampton, Ontario L6T 5P6



Dear Red:



We refer to our letter to you of January 10, 2005 and our undertakings set forth therein.


We have been advised by Nortel Networks Corporation (“Nortel”) that the trading restrictions under
the current cease trading orders issued by the Canadian securities regulatory authorities and/or
Section 306(a) of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 may preclude us from deciding to make
payments of our respective RTP Amounts through the surrender of Nortel common shares (“NNC Shares”)
until after such restrictions have been rescinded and/or cease to apply. Accordingly, as Nortel
has suggested, we will make the first scheduled payment of our respective RTP Amounts five business
days after Nortel notifies us in writing that we are no longer barred from trading in Nortel
securities under applicable Canadian or U.S. rules. If any of us chooses to make such payment in
NNC Shares and such scheduled payment date is not within a Window Period as defined in Nortel
Procedure No. 320-28, the surrender of shares to be made on account of such payment will be made by
those so choosing on the first business day of the first open Window Period immediately following
such scheduled payment date.



Yours very truly,




	 	 	 
	          /s/ Pascal Debon

	 	          /s/ John Giamatteo
	 

	 	 
	Pascal Debon

	 	John Giamatteo
	 
	 	 
	          /s/ Malcolm Collins

	 	          /s/ Steven Pusey
	 

	 	 
	Malcolm Collins

	 	Steven Pusey
	 
	 	 
	          /s/ Brian McFadden

	 	          /s/ Chahram Bolouri
	 

	 	 
	Brian McFadden

	 	Chahram Bolouri
	 
	 	 
	          /s/ Susan L. Spradley

	 	          /s/ Robert Mao
	 

	 	 
	Susan L. Spradley

	 	Robert Mao
	 
	 	 
	          /s/ Nicholas DeRoma

	 	          /s/ Greg Mumford
	 

	 	 
	Nicholas DeRoma

	 	Greg Mumford
	 
	 	 
	          /s/ William Donovan

	 	          /s/ Dion Joannou
	 

	 	 
	William Donovan

	 	Dion Joannou
[Nos. 18354-4-II; 18669-1-II.

Division Two.

August 23, 1996.]

#### *In the Matter of the Guardianship and Custody of*Nicole Vollendorff. *In the Matter of the Custody of*Nicole Vollendorff. Carolyn Vollendorff, *Respondent,*v. Heidi Vollendorff, *Appellant.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for Thur-ston County, No. 93-3-01070-3, Wm. Thomas McPhee, J., entered June 13, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, A.C.J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Armstrong, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**INTERLINEBRANDS, INC.**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Interline Brands, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 26, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas J.Tossavainen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1)    | The Report fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                      |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 
| /S/  THOMAS J. TOSSAVAINEN |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Thomas J. Tossavainen      |   |
| Chief Financial Officer    |   |
| November 5,  2008     |   |

 

----
UNALASKA iSLANO 

27 August 2012 

Mr. Dennls J. DeVany 

Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington DC 20590 

Re: Essential Air Service for Akutan, Alaska 

Mr. DeVany, 

My letter of 7 August 2012 provided you with comments from the City of Akutan regarding 

essential air service for Akutan (copy attached). We indicated the City is supportive of replacing 

PenAir as the EAS carrier for Akutan through the required RFP process. However, we would 

still appreciate answers to the questions posed to you in the August 6th letter in order for the 

city to adopt a final position and recommendations. 

In the meantime, we are in receipt of copies of letters directed to you from PenAir and State of 

Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, requesting that EAS service "be 

changed from Akutan Seaplane Base (KQA) to the new airport for Akutan on Akun Island 

(ICAO:PAUT;FAA:TAK)." Once again, this is an action the City can support, if we are informed 

about the aircraft to be used to service the new airport. Using the current Grumman Goose for 

this purpose is not a reasonable or acceptable alternative, since the residents of Akutan and 

Trident Seafoods will have to live with the same poor quality service, and pay more to use the 

airport marine link between Akun Island and the village/Trident 

. '· 
Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

27 August 2012 

Page? 

For this reason, we understand and support the goal of getting Grant Air to begin immediate 

interim service with the Ki~g Air, pending the selection of a new EAS carrier, per the RFP 

process that I undE3~StC3Qd is already under way. 

·'~' . Sincerely, 

IS/ 

Joe Bereskin 

Mayor 

Enclosure 

Via E-Mail 

cc: Marc Luiken, Commissioner, State of Alaska DOT&PF 

Honorable Stanley Mack, Mayor, Aleutians East Borough
III

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 395

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 17, 2002

Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Celebrating the 50th anniversary of the Constitution of the

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

Whereas on July 3, 1952, the President signed Public Law

82–447 (66 Stat. 327), approving the Constitution of the

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico;

Whereas on July 10, 1952, the Constitutional Convention of

Puerto Rico reconvened and approved the conditions established by Public Law 82–447;
2

HCON 395 RFS

Whereas on July 25, 1952, Governor Luis Mun ̃oz Marı ́n proclaimed that the constitution was in effect;

Whereas the United States citizens of Puerto Rico have

proudly fulfilled their duties to this great Nation, and

some have made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of democracy, freedom, and the United States Constitution

since World War I; and

Whereas the cultural diversity of the United States has been

enriched by the people of Puerto Rico who have preserved

and promoted their culture, language, and identity: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress celebrates the 50th anni3 versary of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Puer4 to Rico.

Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 2002.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
**Exhibit 32.1**

GMH COMMUNITIESTRUST

CERTIFICATIONREQUIRED BYRULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Gary M.Holloway, Sr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of GMHCommunities Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the “Company”),hereby certify that, to my knowledge:

(1)          The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March31, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)          The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

*        *        *
| /s/ Gary M. Holloway, Sr.                  |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Gary M. Holloway, Sr.                      |
| Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                            |
|                                            |
| Date: May 10, 2007                              |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA

No. 16–0609

Filed June 23, 2017

STATE OF IOWA,

Appellee,

vs.

ZACHARY RYAN JAMES,

Appellant.

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Adams County, Dustria A. 

Relph, Judge.

The district court granted the State’s motion to regulate discovery 

and prevented the defendant from issuing ex parte subpoenas duces 

tecum on third parties without notice to the State. AFFIRMED.

Unes J. Booth of Booth Law Firm, Osceola, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Darrel Mullins and Andrew B. 

Prosser, Assistant Attorneys General, and Douglas D. Daggett, County 

Attorney, for appellee.

Alan R. Ostergren, Muscatine, for amicus curiae Iowa County 

Attorneys Association.
2

ZAGER, Justice.

This case is a companion case to State v. Russell, ___ N.W.2d ___ 

(Iowa 2017), also filed today. This case raises the same legal 

propositions1 as those in Russell. Specifically, the district court order in 

this case prevented James from issuing an ex parte subpoena duces 

tecum and provided,

Defendant shall not [serve] or deliver any subpoena on any 

person or entity for any purpose other than to secure the 

attendance of that person or entity as a witness at a 

deposition, on notice to all parties, pursuant to I.R.Crim.P. 

Rules 2.13(1) or (2) or Rule 2.13(2)(b) or to secure the 

attendance of a witness at trial or other court hearing.

We granted James’s application for discretionary review. Since the 

same legal reasoning and opinion in Russell fully applies here, our 

opinion here is controlled and governed by our opinion in Russell. For 

the reasons set forth in Russell, the decision of the district court is 

affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

This opinion shall not be published.

1The defendant also raises the question of the right to confrontation under the 

United States Constitution and the Iowa Constitution, which was not raised in Russell, 

___ N.W.2d at ___. However, the defendant did not raise this issue in his motion to 

reconsider the district court’s ruling, and therefore raises it for the first time on appeal. 

We do not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal, including constitutional 

issues, and therefore error was not preserved on this claim. State v. Derby, 800 N.W.2d 

52, 60 (Iowa 2011).
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 340 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 340

Designating December 10, 2000, as ``National Children's Memorial Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2000

Mr. Reid (for himself, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Baucus, 
Mr. Bayh, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Bryan, Mr. Cleland, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Craig, 
  Mr. Dodd, Mr. Dorgan, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Helms, Mr. Hollings, Mr. 
     Inhofe, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Kerrey, Mr. Kohl, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. 
  Lautenberg, Mrs. Lincoln, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Robb, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. 
  Voinovich, Mr. Gramm, Mr. Torricelli, Mr. Hagel, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. 
Durbin, Mr. Byrd, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Biden, Mr. Roth, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. 
 Conrad, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Murkowski, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Levin, Mr. Thurmond, 
 Mr. Bunning, Mr. Domenici, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Nickles, Mr. Roberts, 
 Mr. Sessions, Mr. Smith of New Hampshire, Mr. Warner, Mrs. Boxer, and 
 Mr. Wellstone) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

            October 24 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating December 10, 2000, as ``National Children's Memorial Day''.

Whereas approximately 80,000 infants, children, teenagers, and young adults of 
        families living throughout the United States die each year from myriad 
        causes;
Whereas the death of an infant, child, teenager, or young adult of a family is 
        considered to be 1 of the greatest tragedies that a parent or family 
        will ever endure during a lifetime; and
Whereas a supportive environment and empathy and understanding are considered 
        critical factors in the healing process of a family that is coping with 
        and recovering from the loss of a loved one: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL CHILDREN'S MEMORIAL DAY.

    The Senate--
            (1) designates December 10, 2000, as ``National Children's 
        Memorial Day''; and
            (2) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling upon the people of the United States to observe the day 
        with appropriate ceremonies and activities in remembrance of 
        the many infants, children, teenagers, and young adults of 
        families in the United States who have died.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 18800-7-II.

Division Two.

May 31, 1996.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Nancy L. Parker, *Respondent, and*Timothy J. Parker, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 92-3-02692-8, Grant L. Anderson, J., entered October 7, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, J., concurred in by Morgan and Armstrong, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned SEP:

*Time and Date*: 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m., February 21-22, 2012 (Closed).                    

*Place:*                         Crowne Plaza Atlanta Perimeter Hotel at Ravinia, 4355 Ashford Dunwoody Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30346 Telephone: (770) 395-7700.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                    

*Matters To Be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to “Grants for Injury Control Research Centers, Panel 2, FOA CE12-001”.                    

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Jane Suen, Dr. P.H., M.S., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE., Mailstop F63, Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3724, Telephone (770) 488-4281.                    

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Dated: January 11, 2012.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2012-832 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
# 0008^**Notice of** **APPEAL This** **notice of** **appeal is** **filed by** **Sandy Schinzel,** **Charles Tate** **jr party** **to this** **proceeding who** **seeks to** **alter the** **trials courts** **judgment or other** **appealable order.** **1. The** **trial court,** **cause number,** **and style** **of this** **case are** **as shown** **in the** **caption above.** **2. The** **judgment or** **order appeal** **frOom w2as** **signed on** **date, Thursday,03-19-19** **3. Sandy** **Schinzel desires** **to appeal** **from all** **portions of** **the judgment** **10 days to** **vacate premises** **4.This appeal** **is being** **to court** **of 4th** **floor COURT** **of appeals** **5.This notice** **is being** **filed by** **Sandy Schinzel** **jointly by** **the following** **psrties whose** **interests are** **aligned: Sandy** **Schinzel -■--;■**