Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 108 / Thursday, June 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 32487 

(2) Polish Fest fireworks display on 

June 14, 2014, from 10:15 p.m. until 

11:15 p.m.; 

(3) Summerfest fireworks display on 

June 25, 2014, and July 2, 2014 from 

9:15 p.m. until 10:30 p.m.; 

(4) Festa Italiana fireworks display on 

each day of July 18, 19, and 20, 2014, 

from 10:15 p.m. until 11:15 p.m.; 

(5) Arab World Festival fireworks 

display on August 9, 2014, from 9:15 

p.m. until 10:15 p.m.; 

(6) German Fest fireworks display on 

July 25, 2014, from 10:15 p.m. until 

11:15 p.m.; 

(7) Irish Fest fireworks display on 

August 17, 2014, from 10:15 p.m. until 

11:15 p.m.; 

(8) Indian Summer fireworks display 

on September 6, 2014, from 9:45 p.m. 

until 10:45 p.m. 

This safety zone will encompass the 

waters of Lake Michigan within 

Milwaukee Harbor including the Harbor 

Island Lagoon enclosed by a line 

connecting the following points: 

beginning at 43°02′00′′ N, 087°53′53′′ W; 

then south to 43°01′44′′ N, 087°53′53′′ 

W; then east to 43°01′44′′ N, 087°53′25′′ 

W; then north to 43°02′00′′ N, 

087°53′25′′ W; then west to the point of 

origin. All vessels must obtain 

permission from the Captain of the Port, 

Lake Michigan, or his or her on-scene 

representative to enter, move within, or 

exit the safety zone. Vessels and persons 

granted permission to enter the safety 

zone must obey all lawful orders or 

directions of the Captain of the Port, 

Lake Michigan, or his or her on-scene 

representative. This document is issued 

under authority of 33 CFR 165.935 

Safety Zone, Milwaukee Harbor, 

Milwaukee, WI and 5 U.S.C. 552(a). In 

addition to this document in the 

Federal Register, the Coast Guard will 

provide the maritime community with 

advance notification of the enforcement 

period via broadcast Notice to Mariners 

or Local Notice to Mariners. The 

Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or 

his or her on-scene representative may 

be contacted via VHF Channel 16. 

Dated: May 21, 2014. 

M.W. Sibley, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port, Lake Michigan. 

[FR Doc. 2014–13147 Filed 6–4–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2014–0338] 

Safety Zone; Independence Day 

Fireworks, Kings Beach, CA 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of 

regulation. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce 

the safety zone for the Independence 

Day Fireworks, Kings Beach, CA in the 

Captain of the Port, San Francisco area 

of responsibility on July 3, 2014. This 

action is necessary to protect life and 

property of the maritime public from the 

hazards associated with the fireworks 

display. During the enforcement period, 

unauthorized persons or vessels are 

prohibited from entering into, transiting 

through, or anchoring in the safety zone, 

unless authorized by the Patrol 

Commander (PATCOM). 

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 

165.1191, Table 1, number 17, will be 

enforced from 7 a.m. through 10 p.m. on 

July 3, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this notice, call 

or email Lieutenant Junior Grade 

William Hawn, Sector San Francisco 

Waterways Safety Division, U.S. Coast 

Guard; telephone 415–399–7442, email 

D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast 

Guard will enforce a safety zone in 

navigable waters around and under the 

fireworks barge within a radius of 100 

feet during the loading, transit, and 

arrival of the fireworks barge to the 

display location and until the start of 

the fireworks display. From 7 a.m. until 

9 a.m. on July 3, 2014, the fireworks 

barge will be loading pyrotechnics off of 

Tahoe Keys Marina in South Lake 

Tahoe, CA in approximate position 

38°56′05′′ N, 120°00′09′′ W (NAD 83). 

From 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. on July 3, 2014, 

the loaded fireworks barge will transit 

from Tahoe Keys Marina to the launch 

site off of Kings Beach, CA in 

approximate position 39°13′55′′ N, 

120°01′42′′ W (NAD 83) where it will 

remain until the commencement of the 

fireworks display. Upon the 

commencement of the 30 minute 

fireworks display, scheduled to begin at 

9:30 p.m. on July 3, 2014, the safety 

zone will increase in size to encompass 

the navigable waters around and under 

the fireworks barge within a radius 

1,000 feet in approximate position 

39°13′55′′ N, 120°01′42′′ W (NAD 83) for 

the Independence Day Fireworks, Kings 

beach, CA in 33 CFR 165.1191, Table 1, 

Item number 17. This safety zone will 

be in effect from 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. on 

July 3, 2014. 

Under the provisions of 33 CFR 

165.1191, unauthorized persons or 

vessels are prohibited from entering 

into, transiting through, or anchoring in 

the safety zone during all applicable 

effective dates and times, unless 

authorized to do so by the PATCOM. 

Additionally, each person who receives 

notice of a lawful order or direction 

issued by an official patrol vessel shall 

obey the order or direction. The 

PATCOM is empowered to forbid entry 

into and control the regulated area. The 

PATCOM shall be designated by the 

Commander, Coast Guard Sector San 

Francisco. The PATCOM may, upon 

request, allow the transit of commercial 

vessels through regulated areas when it 

is safe to do so. 

This notice is issued under authority 

of 33 CFR 165.1191 and 5 U.S.C. 552 (a). 

In addition to this notice in the Federal 

Register, the Coast Guard will provide 

the maritime community with extensive 

advance notification of the safety zone 

and its enforcement period via the Local 

Notice to Mariners. If the Captain of the 

Port determines that the regulated area 

need not be enforced for the full 

duration stated in this notice, a 

Broadcast Notice to Mariners may be 

used to grant general permission to 

enter the regulated area. 

Dated: May 22, 2014. 

Gregory G. Stump, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port San Francisco. 

[FR Doc. 2014–13142 Filed 6–4–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

34 CFR Chapter III 

[ED–2014–OSERS–0025] 

Final Priority; National Institute on 

Disability and Rehabilitation 

Research—Rehabilitation Engineering 

Research Centers 

AGENCY: Office of Special Education and 

Rehabilitative Services, Department of 

Education. 

ACTION: Final priority. 

[CFDA Number: 84.133E–5.] 

SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for 

Special Education and Rehabilitative 

Services announces a priority for the 

Disability and Rehabilitation Research 

Projects and Centers Program 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
32488 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 108 / Thursday, June 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

administered by the National Institute 

on Disability and Rehabilitation 

Research (NIDRR). Specifically, we 

announce a priority for a Rehabilitation 

Engineering Research Center (RERC) on 

Technologies to Enhance Independence 

in Daily Living for Adults with 

Cognitive Impairments. The Assistant 

Secretary may use this priority for 

competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2014 

and later years. We take this action to 

focus research attention on an area of 

national need. We intend the priority to 

contribute to improved outcomes 

related to independence in daily 

activities in the home, community, or 

workplace setting for adults with 

cognitive impairments. 

DATES: Effective Date: This priority is 

effective July 7, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patricia Barrett, U.S. Department of 

Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., 

Room 5142, Potomac Center Plaza 

(PCP), Washington, DC 20202–2700. 

Telephone: (202) 245–6211 or by email: 

patricia.barrett@ed.gov. 

If you use a telecommunications 

device for the deaf (TDD) or a text 

telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay 

Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877– 

8339. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Purpose of Program: The purpose of 

the Disability and Rehabilitation 

Research Projects and Centers Program 

is to plan and conduct research, 

demonstration projects, training, and 

related activities, including 

international activities, to develop 

methods, procedures, and rehabilitation 

technology that maximize the full 

inclusion and integration into society, 

employment, independent living, family 

support, and economic and social selfsufficiency of individuals with 

disabilities, especially individuals with 

the most severe disabilities. The 

program is also intended to improve the 

effectiveness of services authorized 

under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as 

amended (Rehabilitation Act). 

Rehabilitation Engineering Research 

Centers 

The purpose of the RERCs, which are 

funded through the Disability and 

Rehabilitation Research Projects and 

Centers Program, is to achieve the goals 

of, and improve the effectiveness of, 

services authorized under the 

Rehabilitation Act through welldesigned research, training, technical 

assistance, and dissemination activities 

in important topical areas as specified 

by NIDRR with guidance from its 

Rehabilitation Research Advisory 

Council. These activities are designed to 

benefit rehabilitation service providers, 

individuals with disabilities, family 

members, policymakers, and other 

research stakeholders. Additional 

information on the RERC program can 

be found at: http://www2.ed.gov/

programs/rerc/index.html#types. 

Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) and 

764(b)(3). 

Applicable Program Regulations: 34 

CFR part 350. 

We published a notice of proposed 

priority for this program in the Federal 

Register on April 2, 2014 (79 FR 18490). 

That notice contained background 

information and our reasons for 

proposing the particular priority. 

There are no differences between the 

proposed priority and this final priority. 

Public Comment: In response to our 

invitation in the notice of proposed 

priority we did not receive any 

comments on the proposed priority. 

Final Priority 

The Assistant Secretary for Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services 

establishes a priority for a RERC on 

Technologies to Enhance Independence 

in Daily Living for Adults with 

Cognitive Impairments. 

The RERC must focus on innovative 

technological solutions, new 

knowledge, and implementation 

strategies that enhance the 

independence and self-management of 

adults with cognitive impairment. 

Under this priority, the RERC must 

research, develop, and evaluate new 

technologies, or adapt and evaluate 

existing technologies, to enhance the 

ability of adults with cognitive 

impairment to perform daily activities 

of their choice in the home, community, 

or workplace. Technologies developed 

or adapted must be designed for 

commercialization as consumer 

products or for integration into 

rehabilitation practice or relevant 

service delivery systems. Research and 

development topics under this priority 

may include, but are not limited to: 

Monitoring and prompting technologies 

or other information or communication 

aids; assistive technologies, including 

socially assistive robotics; mobile and 

wearable technologies; virtual reality; 

and care coordination or tele-health, 

tele-rehabilitation, and other telesupport systems to facilitate improved 

activities of daily living. 

In responding to this priority, 

applicants must specify the target 

populations or subgroups of adults with 

cognitive impairments that they intend 

to focus on and identify the setting or 

settings for which they intend to 

develop technologies: Home, 

community, or workplace. Applicants 

must also limit the number of research 

and development projects to a 

maximum of eight, and restrict the range 

of different types of technologies to 

what is manageable with available 

resources. 

Under this priority, the RERC must be 

designed to contribute to the following 

outcomes: 

(a) Increased technical and scientific 

knowledge relevant to technologies for 

increasing independence in daily living 

for adults with cognitive impairments. 

The RERC must contribute to this 

outcome by establishing a rigorous 

research and development plan that is 

balanced between technology 

development or adaption and 

technology evaluation and incorporates 

needs assessment, usability testing, and 

intervention development or efficacy 

studies, as appropriate. The research 

and development plan must be designed 

to build a base of evidence for assessing 

the usability, accessibility, acceptance, 

utility, and cost-benefit of technologies 

intended to improve independence in 

daily activities for adults with cognitive 

impairment in the home, community, or 

workplace settings. The RERC must 

contribute to this outcome by: 

(i) Building a transdisciplinary team 

of collaborators from relevant 

disciplines, such as: Rehabilitation and 

bio-engineering, computer science, 

human factors specialists, cognitive and 

behavioral scientists, clinicians, and 

other relevant providers; 

(ii) Conducting research and research 

syntheses or secondary analysis of 

existing data to evaluate user needs and 

specify the accessibility, acceptance, 

and human factors design features that 

will need to be built into the technology 

solutions developed and evaluated by 

the RERC to accommodate the cognitive 

impairments and preferences of the 

target population; 

(iii) Conducting rigorous usability 

testing in the settings in which the 

technology will be used; 

(iv) Developing and prioritizing a list 

of evaluation topics that, when 

addressed, will lead to research-based 

information on the utility or efficacy of 

technology solutions developed by the 

RERC; and 

(v) Involving key stakeholders in the 

research and research planning 

activities to maximize the relevance and 

usefulness of the research products 

being developed. Stakeholders can 

include, but are not limited to, 

individuals with disabilities and their 

families; national, State, or local-level 

policymakers, administrators, or service 

providers; and industry representatives. 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 108 / Thursday, June 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 32489 

(b) Improved usability and 

effectiveness of technologies, products, 

devices, systems, performance 

guidelines, and assessment tools 

through systematic development or 

adaptation, testing, and evaluation of 

innovations. In developing the 

technologies under this priority the 

RERC must: 

(i) Incorporate user-centered design 

strategies and consider the context in 

which the technology product, device, 

or system will be used; 

(ii) Emphasize the principles of 

universal design and, as appropriate, 

conform to human factors standards, 

such as reliability, safety, and 

simplicity; accessibility and 

acceptability to users; protective of 

users’ privacy preferences; intuitive user 

interfaces; feedback in meaningful 

sensory modalities; and appropriateness 

to diverse populations; 

(iii) Incorporate ongoing training 

opportunities or user supports into the 

design of the technology or into the 

practice settings or delivery systems in 

which the technology will be integrated; 

and 

(iv) Ensure that the technologies are 

interoperable within existing 

rehabilitation systems or home or 

mobile technologies and that they 

communicate with existing information 

technology systems, as appropriate. 

(c) Improved research capacity areas 

that will contribute to enhancing the 

ability of adults with cognitive 

impairment to perform daily activities. 

The RERC must contribute to this 

outcome by collaborating with the 

relevant institutions of higher 

education, professional associations, 

clinicians and service providers, and 

other researchers or educators, as 

appropriate. 

(d) Improved awareness and 

understanding of cutting-edge 

developments and promising 

technology solutions that will 

contribute to enhancing the ability of 

adults with cognitive impairment to 

perform daily activities. The RERC must 

contribute to this outcome by 

identifying and communicating with 

relevant stakeholders, including NIDRR, 

individuals with disabilities and their 

representatives, disability organizations, 

service providers, professional journals, 

manufacturers, and other interested 

parties regarding trends and evolving 

product concepts related to its 

designated priority research area. 

(e) Increased impact of research and 

development activities carried out 

under this priority area. The RERC must 

contribute to this outcome by: 

(i) Providing technical assistance to 

relevant public and private 

organizations, individuals with 

disabilities and their families, long-term 

services and supports providers, and 

employers on policies, guidelines, and 

standards; and 

(ii) Establishing or contributing to an 

existing program or service that 

provides objective information and 

technical and consumer reviews about 

technologies of promise to support 

independence in daily living for adults 

with cognitive impairments. 

(f) Increased transfer of RERCdeveloped technologies to the 

marketplace for widespread testing and 

use by developing and implementing a 

plan to ensure that technologies 

developed by the RERC are made 

available to the public or to service 

delivery systems that serve the public. 

This technology transfer plan must be 

developed in the first year of the project 

period in consultation with the NIDRRfunded Center on Knowledge 

Translation for Technology Transfer. 

Types of Priorities 

When inviting applications for a 

competition using one or more 

priorities, we designate the type of each 

priority as absolute, competitive 

preference, or invitational through a 

notice in the Federal Register. The 

effect of each type of priority follows: 

Absolute priority: Under an absolute 

priority, we consider only applications 

that meet the priority (34 CFR 

75.105(c)(3)). 

Competitive preference priority: 

Under a competitive preference priority, 

we give competitive preference to an 

application by (1) awarding additional 

points, depending on the extent to 

which the application meets the priority 

(34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting 

an application that meets the priority 

over an application of comparable merit 

that does not meet the priority (34 CFR 

75.105(c)(2)(ii)). 

Invitational priority: Under an 

invitational priority, we are particularly 

interested in applications that meet the 

priority. However, we do not give an 

application that meets the priority a 

preference over other applications (34 

CFR 75.105(c)(1)). 

This notice does not preclude us from 

proposing additional priorities, 

requirements, definitions, or selection 

criteria, subject to meeting applicable 

rulemaking requirements. 

Note: This notice does not solicit 

applications. In any year in which we choose 

to use this priority, we invite applications 

through a notice in the Federal Register. 

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 

Regulatory Impact Analysis 

Under Executive Order 12866, the 

Secretary must determine whether this 

regulatory action is ‘‘significant’’ and, 

therefore, subject to the requirements of 

the Executive order and subject to 

review by the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive 

Order 12866 defines a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ as an action likely to 

result in a rule that may— 

(1) Have an annual effect on the 

economy of $100 million or more, or 

adversely affect a sector of the economy, 

productivity, competition, jobs, the 

environment, public health or safety, or 

State, local, or tribal governments or 

communities in a material way (also 

referred to as an ‘‘economically 

significant’’ rule); 

(2) Create serious inconsistency or 

otherwise interfere with an action taken 

or planned by another agency; 

(3) Materially alter the budgetary 

impacts of entitlement grants, user fees, 

or loan programs or the rights and 

obligations of recipients thereof; or 

(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues 

arising out of legal mandates, the 

President’s priorities, or the principles 

stated in the Executive order. 

This final regulatory action is not a 

significant regulatory action subject to 

review by OMB under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866. 

We have also reviewed this final 

regulatory action under Executive Order 

13563, which supplements and 

explicitly reaffirms the principles, 

structures, and definitions governing 

regulatory review established in 

Executive Order 12866. To the extent 

permitted by law, Executive Order 

13563 requires that an agency— 

(1) Propose or adopt regulations only 

upon a reasoned determination that 

their benefits justify their costs 

(recognizing that some benefits and 

costs are difficult to quantify); 

(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the 

least burden on society, consistent with 

obtaining regulatory objectives and 

taking into account—among other things 

and to the extent practicable—the costs 

of cumulative regulations; 

(3) In choosing among alternative 

regulatory approaches, select those 

approaches that maximize net benefits 

(including potential economic, 

environmental, public health and safety, 

and other advantages; distributive 

impacts; and equity); 

(4) To the extent feasible, specify 

performance objectives, rather than the 

behavior or manner of compliance a 

regulated entity must adopt; and 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
32490 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 108 / Thursday, June 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

(5) Identify and assess available 

alternatives to direct regulation, 

including economic incentives—such as 

user fees or marketable permits—to 

encourage the desired behavior, or 

provide information that enables the 

public to make choices. 

Executive Order 13563 also requires 

an agency ‘‘to use the best available 

techniques to quantify anticipated 

present and future benefits and costs as 

accurately as possible.’’ The Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs of 

OMB has emphasized that these 

techniques may include ‘‘identifying 

changing future compliance costs that 

might result from technological 

innovation or anticipated behavioral 

changes.’’ 

We are issuing this final priority only 

on a reasoned determination that its 

benefits justify its costs. In choosing 

among alternative regulatory 

approaches, we selected those 

approaches that maximize net benefits. 

Based on the analysis that follows, the 

Department believes that this regulatory 

action is consistent with the principles 

in Executive Order 13563. 

We also have determined that this 

regulatory action does not unduly 

interfere with State, local, and tribal 

governments in the exercise of their 

governmental functions. 

In accordance with both Executive 

orders, the Department has assessed the 

potential costs and benefits, both 

quantitative and qualitative, of this 

regulatory action. The potential costs 

are those resulting from statutory 

requirements and those we have 

determined as necessary for 

administering the Department’s 

programs and activities. 

The benefits of the Disability and 

Rehabilitation Research Projects and 

Centers Program have been well 

established over the years, as projects 

similar to the one envisioned by the 

final priority have been completed 

successfully. The new RERC would 

generate, disseminate, and promote the 

use of new information that is intended 

to improve outcomes for individuals 

with disabilities in the areas of 

community living and participation, 

employment, and health and function. 

Accessible Format: Individuals with 

disabilities can obtain this document in 

an accessible format (e.g., braille, large 

print, audiotape, or compact disc) on 

request to the program contact person 

listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 

Electronic Access to This Document: 

The official version of this document is 

the document published in the Federal 

Register. Free Internet access to the 

official edition of the Federal Register 

and the Code of Federal Regulations is 

available via the Federal Digital System 

at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you 

can view this document, as well as all 

other documents of this Department 

published in the Federal Register, in 

text or Adobe Portable Document 

Format (PDF). To use PDF you must 

have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is 

available free at the site. 

You may also access documents of the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register by using the article search 

feature at: www.federalregister.gov. 

Specifically, through the advanced 

search feature at this site, you can limit 

your search to documents published by 

the Department. 

Dated: June 2, 2014. 

Michael K. Yudin, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services. 

[FR Doc. 2014–13095 Filed 6–4–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

POSTAL SERVICE 

39 CFR Part 111 

Elimination of Business Reply Mail 

(BRM) Parcels; Deferral of 

Enforcement Date 

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM. 

ACTION: Final rule; partial deferral of the 

enforcement date. 

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives 

notice that it is deferring the previouslyannounced enforcement date of January 

25, 2015, for eliminating mailers’ option 

to use Business Reply Mail® to pay 

postage for parcel-shaped items. 

DATES: The enforcement date for the 

relevant portions of the final rule 

published December 18, 2013 (78 FR 

76548), is delayed indefinitely. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Suzanne Newman, 603–673–2002. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Postal 

Service hereby gives notice that the 

enforcement date of January 25, 2015, 

for eliminating mailers’ option to use 

Business Reply Mail (BRM) to pay 

postage for parcel-shaped items, 

previously published on December 18, 

2013, in a final rule in the Federal 

Register (78 FR 76548–76560), is hereby 

deferred until further notice. In 

particular, this deferral applies to the 

requirements specified in the 

amendment to Mailing Standards of the 

United States Postal Service, Domestic 

Mail Manual (DMM®) 505.1.4.1 

(Business Reply Mail—General 

Information—Description) published at 

78 FR 76560. The decision to defer the 

enforcement date of this change was 

based on the review of subsequent 

mailer feedback. All other requirements 

that were published in the Federal 

Register (78 FR 76548–76560) will be 

implemented as specified. 

Despite the decision to defer the 

above referenced enforcement date, the 

Postal Service continues to believe that 

mailers who currently distribute BRM 

cartons and labels for the return of 

parcel-shaped items would be better 

served by switching to Merchandise 

Return Service® In light of mailers’ 

continuing eligibility to use BRM for the 

payment of postage for parcel-shaped 

items, and the Postal Service’s goal of 

promoting enhanced package visibility, 

the Postal Service expects to propose 

rules mandating the use of an Intelligent 

Mail® package barcode on certain BRM 

cartons and labels. 

Stanley F. Mires, 

Attorney, Legal Policy & Legislative Advice. 

[FR Doc. 2014–13042 Filed 6–4–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–12–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 300 

[EPA–HQ–SFUND–2003–0009; FRL–9911– 

82–Region 10] 

National Oil and Hazardous 

Substances Pollution Contingency 

Plan; National Priorities List: Deletion 

of the Harbor Oil Superfund Site 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) Region 10 announces the 

deletion of the Harbor Oil Superfund 

Site (Site) located at 11535 North Force 

Avenue in Portland, Oregon, from the 

National Priorities List (NPL). The NPL, 

promulgated pursuant to section 105 of 

the Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is 

an appendix of the National Oil and 

Hazardous Substances Pollution 

Contingency Plan (NCP). The EPA and 

the State of Oregon, through the 

Department of Environmental Quality 

have determined that all appropriate 

response actions under CERCLA have 

been completed. However, this deletion 

does not preclude future actions under 

Superfund. 

DATES: Effective Date: This action is 

effective June 5, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES