alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) |   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respect, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                            |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Massimiliano              Pozzoni                                                                                            |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                 |   |   |        |
| Name:                Massimiliano                PozzoniTitle:                Principal Financial OfficerDate:                December 14, 2006 |   |   |   |

----
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 06616**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 06616\06616_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 06616\06616_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 06616\06616_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 06616\06616_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06616\06616_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06616\06616_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06616\06616_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06616\06616_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 06616\Certification Statement Plant ID 06616.PDF Plant certification statement x 

### 06616\Supporting Documents\06616_Faulkner Site Plan.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06616\Supporting Documents\06616_Morgantown wwts waterbalance for Part D.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06616\Supporting Documents\06616_MT Site Plan.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 06616\Supporting Documents\06616_MT Water and Wastewater Flow Line Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 348 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.348
                                     Agreed to September 3, 2002        

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
          the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL BOOK 
              FESTIVAL.

    (a) In General.--The Library of Congress (in this resolution 
referred to as the ``sponsor''), in cooperation with the First Lady, 
may sponsor the National Book Festival (in this resolution referred to 
as the ``event'') on the Capitol Grounds.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on September 21, 2002, 
or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives 
and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly 
designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
        (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
        (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    (a) Structures and Equipment.--Subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, the sponsor may cause to be placed on the 
Capitol Grounds such stage, seating, booths, sound amplification and 
video devices, and other related structures and equipment as may be 
required for the event, including equipment for the broadcast of the 
event over radio, television, and other media outlets.
    (b) Additional Arrangements.--The Architect of the Capitol and the 
Capitol Police Board may make any additional arrangements as may be 
required to carry out the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946 (40 
U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, displays, advertisements, 
and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions 
applicable to the Capitol Grounds in connection with the event.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
#### Terry Lee KINNEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-80-701.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Sept. 21, 1981.

Major R. Wilson, Asst. Public Defender, Oklahoma City, for appellant.

Jan Eric Cartwright, Atty. Gen., Reta M. Strubhar, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CORNISH, Judge:

Terry Lee Kinney, appellant, was convicted by a jury of Robbery With Firearms, After Former Conviction of a Felony, in the District Court of Oklahoma County, Case No. CRF-79-4261. A sentence of ninety-nine (99) years was imposed.

*747The disposition of this case turns on the issue of the admissibility of testimony pertaining to the appellant’s post-arrest silence. In response to the prosecutor’s questions concerning the appellant’s arrest, the officer explained that he advised the appellant of his constitutional rights from the *Miranda*warning card. The prosecutor then asked, “What was his response to that?” The officer answered, “He stated that he would make no statements whatsoever to me pertaining to the robbery.”

The United States Supreme Court has enunciated the rule that comments on the post-arrest silence of an accused violate the Fourteenth Amendment. *See Griffin v. California,*380 U.S. 609, 85 S.Ct. 1229, 14 L.Ed.2d 106 (1965); *Doyle v. Ohio,*426 U.S. 610, 96 S.Ct. 2240, 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976). The silence of an accused at the time of arrest, following the *Miranda*warnings, should be interpreted as nothing more than an exercise of these rights. Thus, it is error when a comment on an accused’s silence is made because of the possible implication of guilt.

The United States Supreme Court recently held in *Edwards v. Arizona,*- U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981), that a confession from an accused following his request to have counsel present violated his Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights, pursuant to *Miranda v. Arizona,*384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). While the prosecutor in the instant case was aware that the appellant had made no statement or confession to the police when the was arrested, he knew that the arresting officer would respond to his question by saying that the appellant chose to remain silent. We disapprove of a prosecutor’s conduct which amounts to a subterfuge to comment on the defendant’s right to remain silent. We hold in *Burroughs*v. *State,*528 P.2d 714 (Okl.Cr.1974), and *Prince v. State,*620 P.2d 431 (Okl.Cr.1980), that comments of this kind elicited by a prosecutor were prejudicial and warranted reversal. We reach the same conclusion here.

Our decision is further supported by comments of the trial judge: “What’s the purpose of this, you cannot mention the fact that he remained silent.” (Tr. 54) “You are getting — you are bordering on something that is bordering on what would be a mistrial. Let’s move on to something else.” (Tr. 55)

Having reviewed the remaining assignments of error, we find them to be without merit.

The judgment of the district court is REVERSED.

BRETT, P. J., and BUSSEY, J., concur.
Exhibit
10.6


 


Diane Allen


East Kansas Agri-Energy, LLC


Garnett, Kansas 66032


 


Dear Diane,


 


It is with pleasure that I present this
correspondence to confirm the decision of William Pracht, The East Kansas the
Board of Directors President, and myself, the offer of employment as our
corporate Administrative, Accounting, and Office Manager. Your employment will
commence on May 01, 2005. You will be paid on a salary basis, on our
normal payroll intervals, at the annual rate of Forty-seven Thousand
Five-hundred Dollars ($47,500.00). During your initial year of employment, you
will be eligible for pay increases/increments based on formal individual
performance appraisals from William Pracht and myself, one (1) performance
every six (6) months of employment. You will also be eligible for payment
of an annual bonus based on performance overall financial performance of the
corporation based on budgeted guidelines. We look forward to your addition of
as a team member of the East Kansas Agri-Energy family. Please let me know if
you need any additional information from Bill Pracht or me.


 


 


	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  
	
  /s/ Michael D. Goblirsch

  	
   

  
	
  Michael D. Goblirsch

  
	
   

  
	
  General Manager – East
  Kansas Agri-Energy, LLC

  
	
   

  
	
  For The President of the
  Board of Directors – East Kansas Agri – Energy, LLC

  
	
   

  
	
  /s/ Diane Allen

  	
   

  
	
  Diane Allen
**Exhibit 15**

 

May 9, 2008

 

GFI Group Inc.

100 Wall Street

New York, New York

 

We have reviewed,in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting OversightBoard (United States), the unaudited interim financial information of GFI Group Inc. and subsidiaries for the three-month periodsended March 31, 2008, and 2007, and have issued our report dated May 9,2008. As indicated in our report, because we did not perform an audit, weexpressed no opinion on that information.

 

We are aware thatour report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2008, is being incorporated by referencein Registration Statement No. 333-122905 on Form S-8.

 

We also are awarethat the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under theSecurities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statementprepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by anaccountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

 

/s/Deloitte & Touche

 

New York, New York

 

----
The Board of Directors
Apple South, Inc.

     We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements
(No. 33-49748, No. 33-68978, No. 333-3764, and No. 333-3736) on Form S-8 and the
registration  statements (No.  333-02958,  No. 333-37345,  and No. 333-25205) on
Form S-3 of Apple South, Inc. of our report dated January 23, 1998,  relating to
the consolidated balance sheets of Apple South, Inc. as of December 28, 1997 and
December  29,  1996,  and  the  related  consolidated  statements  of  earnings,
shareholders'  equity,  and cash  flows for each of the years in the  three-year
period ended  December 28, 1997,  which report  appears in the December 28, 1997
annual report on Form 10-K of Apple South, Inc.


                             KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 23, 1998
EXHIBIT 10.152

                     SECOND ADDENDUM TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT
                               WITH STEVEN H. DONG

                                 STEVEN H. DONG
                           CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
                            2 PARK PLAZA., SUITE 470
                                IRVINE, CA 92614
                     TEL: (714) 833-2094 FAX: (714) 833-7854

                                  July 1, 1996

Nona Morrelli's II, Inc.
2 Park Plaza, Suite 470
Irvine, California  92714

         RE:       Second Addendum to and Renewal of Consulting Agreement

This letter  will serve as a Second  Addendum  to the  undersigned's  Consulting
Agreement dated July 1, 1995 (the  "Consulting  Agreement")  with Nona Morelli's
II, Inc., (the "Company").  Pursuant to the Consulting Agreement,  this Addendum
confirms the renewal of the  Consulting  Agreement and related  Addendum,  dated
October 4, 1995, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1997.

As soon as practicable following execution of this Addendum,  the Company agrees
to include in a Form S-8  Registration  Statement  at its  expense a  sufficient
number of common shares of the Company in order to pay for professional services
rendered.

The  Company  agrees  that it will  indemnify,  defend  and hold the  Consultant
harmless from and against all demands,  claims, actions,  prosecutions,  losses,
damages, liabilities, costs and expenses, including without limitation interest,
penalties,  and attorney's fees and expenses,  asserted  against,  resulting to,
imposed upon or incurred by Consultant,  directly or indirectly,  resulting from
any dispute, claim, suit, proceeding,  or cause of action arising from or in any
way connected to the  providing of services to the Company under the  Consulting
Agreement and this Addendum to and Renewal of Consulting Agreement.

If the  foregoing is  agreeable,  please  indicate  your  approval by dating and
signing below.

                                        Very truly yours,




                                        /s/  Steven H. Dong, CPA
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Steven H. Dong, CPA
                                             ("Consultant")

APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE

READ AND ACCEPTED THIS 1st day of July, 1996.

NONA MORELLI'S II, INC.

By:  /s/       Fred G. Luke
        ------------------------------
     Name:     Fred G. Luke
     Title:    Chief Executive Officer

                                                        [nm/agr/dongamend11.AGR]
##### 



POLYPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polypore International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  August 16, 2005
    /s/   Robert B. TothRobert B. TothPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Polypore International, Inc. 31
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Amerisa Kornblum, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Odimo Incorporated;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date: August 11, 2005 /s/ Amerisa Kornblum   Amerisa Kornblum   Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DANIEL AARON STONE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. 

R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (4:06-cr-00474-RBH-1)

Submitted: October 17, 2019 Decided: October 22, 2019

Before MOTZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Aaron Stone, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Aaron Stone seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

counseled 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief 

on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists 

would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or 

wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that 

the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Stone has not made 

the requisite showing. See United States v. Mathis, 932 F.3d 242, 266 (4th Cir. 2019)

(concluding “that Hobbs Act robbery constitutes a crime of violence” under the force 

provision in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A) (2012)). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
III

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 277

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 5, 2001

Received and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and

Transportation

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the important contributions of the Hispanic

Chamber of Commerce.

Whereas the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce of the United

States has had a significant impact among Hispanic businesses, and in the business community in general;

Whereas the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce has served in

a key support role, not merely as a business group but

also as a civic organization working in the HispanicAmerican community; and
2

HCON 277 RFS

Whereas the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce has helped to

bring entrepreneurship to the Hispanic community as

well as helping to pool the resources and talents of Hispanic American entrepreneurs: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that it is

3 important to the promotion of the free market process of

4 the United States, to the future success of Hispanic Amer5 icans, and to society at large that the special role of the

6 Hispanic Chamber of Commerce of the United States be

7 recognized and further cultivated to the benefit of all

8 Americans.

Passed the House of Representatives December 4,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.