alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 424 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 424

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 28, 2002

        Received and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Commending the patriotic contributions of the roofing professionals who 
  replaced, at no cost to the Federal Government, the section of the 
 Pentagon's slate roof that was destroyed as a result of the terrorist 
 attacks against the United States that occurred on September 11, 2001.

Whereas the damage to the Pentagon that resulted from the terrorist attacks 
        against the United States that occurred on September 11, 2001, included 
        the destruction of more than an acre of the Pentagon's slate roof;
Whereas roofing professionals from throughout the United States, mostly from 
        small businesses, volunteered to work

together to replace the destroyed section of the Pentagon's roof;

Whereas these roofing professionals donated approximately $450,000 worth of 
        labor and materials to the replacement effort; and
Whereas these roofing professionals successfully replaced 60,000 square feet of 
        the Pentagon's slate roof before September 11, 2002, and at no cost to 
        the Federal Government: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress commends the patriotic contributions of the roofing 
professionals who replaced, at no cost to the Federal Government, the 
section of the Pentagon's slate roof that was destroyed as a result of 
the terrorist attacks against the United States that occurred on 
September 11, 2001.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 27, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
1\,11"K. e-vin Scblemmt'r

('bld. l::!.s1,.'ntl",1 Air Serv jet;; Division

U.s. D~panm~Vlt Triln,:;pl}t'~~iu)~t,

(kti,,'1." of Ill.: S'Crr:l~lr}ofTransponarion

1200 :\e.w Jersey A\~I1H~. S!·

\\·;1:shinglon. D.C ]05flO

RE. Rcquc-« {kd •'.rm2 R~'.~()!h;iliT1.~F.....••;cnti:tf . fir Scrvic« 1)1'01" J ,·\th'.;>!I'i''''.I. IfnI.! _', YuI J

D,JI,}.;I..'[ .\umh.:r O\J.~'t li/·j ,(';,'-1. 'lawt! Citv

The ~1a:;DI1Liry .virport (:t)IlHnissklll md l(1Ja~ and urunimo I:;]: ••lOre...! 4,) accept clll' !~,,:qU<:"lt;JT

I~n p(UII .uhmiHted h; Air Choice One 11"<erv e thc ~[:hPll ell.', :-hmi~ip"tI .virpon i~.,rthe next rw i-ycar

period,

\\,lii!e \'b=.;,nn Ct~~.and h,Jr1 Ot)J].,:.: uuernpted to.auraci ;1 r'n.iniinc earner )0 Sl'n 0: both •'.1.1 r cc mmunruewith [h;;.-present airline er'l\ ironment l!1is ",~f!'uJlwas nut :.ucc<::.";;::l'u[ at this [ifn~;

TI1~CnmmJ~:.il1n undcrsumds II ~ t D()! r..;:qlurcs du! OHr cornmunl t; receives lWI n engine ~·,~rh\:,::

however. 1he %h Jtl i::;. :5Up~Klrti!1J.! the pn"j..~()~.d~H~',mitl..:J Air Chni.t:e On)~'i\ tll'1 LiI",- ::;[Hgk

en1,;in~ air,;:rllt1 due to th" limth:d dll'lI,:I..';:, (If t11;,:rr(,fr; .salssubrmued.

We are aho aware rhnt the f'1'\.'lklsal ~llhmHt\;',J1'1;Air Cnolce Oli:;;.'i:'\.;~..:d~rhe ),::Ofllh,'j' l';!2>"l'1l2<:1 G!P,

tlo\\ 1;'\\.'I it [::c:. !"HU'.;xr\;,'\;'~~nk'n:,1"11'rhc cornmurutj 1., ,11'1'oft their ~,cp Ice \\ hivh "m lower .thc per

pass nger cap reqll ircmcnr \\.'1hIll the t:A ~ I'wgr~m m the present tunc.

.toni I', Dunn

Airport Comrnission Chair
#### Shirley SNODGRASS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-81-328.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

May 14, 1982.

Don Hamilton, Larry Puckett, Oklahoma City, for appellant.

Jan Eric Cartwright, Atty. Gen., Michael Scott Fern, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

On appeal from the judgments rendered against her in the District Court for Pottawatomie County, Case No. CRF-80-149, defendant argues several assignments of error.

The assignment of error requiring reversal of the convictions is that the charging parts of the three counts set forth, failed to state facts sufficient to charge public offenses. Each of the counts in the charging part thereof allege that:

> Defendant ... did approve for payment [a] purchase order .. . knowing the same to be false.

Title 21 O.S.1981, § 531 provides in pertinent part that:

> Every . . . ministerial officer . .. who .. . falsifies any record or paper appertaining to his office ... is guilty of felony.

Defendant while acknowledging that the caption of each count alleges that defendant falsified a record pertaining to her office, argues that the charging parts of the three counts insufficiently allege only that defendant approved purchase orders, knowing them to be false.

Even the most cursory examination of the information supports this contention. “A criminal information is not sufficient unless it alleges particular circumstances showing every element of the offense charged.” *Matter of D.S.H.,*549 P.2d 826 (Okl.Cr.1976).

*1382Since none of the counts allege how or in what manner defendant falsified records pertaining to her office, but only that she approved purchase orders knowing them to be false, the information and the counts thereof failed to state facts sufficient to constitute violations of 21 O.S.1981, § 531.

The judgments and sentences rendered in CRF-80-149 are accordingly REVERSED.

BRETT, P. J., and CORNISH, J., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

          - 29 CFR Part 4007

### CFR Correction

In Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1927 to End, revised as of July 1, 2011, on page 933, § 4007.5 is reinstated to read as follows:

§ 4007.5 

The PBGC applies the rules in subpart C of part 4000 of this chapter to determine the date that a submission under this part was filed with the PBGC.

[68 FR 61352, Oct. 28, 2003]

[FR Doc. 2012-8185 Filed 4-3-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 252

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a series of postage stamps should

be issued in recognition of the recipients of the Congressional Medal

of Honor.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 23, 2001

Mr. OBEY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a series of postage

stamps should be issued in recognition of the recipients

of the Congressional Medal of Honor.

Whereas since July 12, 1862, the United States has recognized the individual gallantry of its soldiers, sailors, and

airmen with the Congressional Medal of Honor;

Whereas more than 3,400 veterans have received this honor

in recognition of their valor in times of war and times of

peace, such as—

(1) Lieutenant William Winegar, 1st New York

Dragoons, who while advancing ahead of his company at

Five Forks, Virginia, accosted a Confederate flagbearer,
2

•HCON 252 IH

and with the firing of only one shot secured the surrender of the entire opposing unit;

(2) Hospital Apprentice First Class David E. Hayden, United States Navy, of Florence, Texas, who while

serving in France during World War I braved machinegun fire sweeping an open field in an effort to save a

mortally wounded Marine corporal;

(3) Major Richard Ira Bong, United States Army

Air Corps, of Poplar, Wisconsin, the top-scoring United

States ace in World War II, whose 40 aerial victories

surpassed Eddie Rickenbacker’s World War I record;

(4) Sergeant Joseph C. Rodriguez, United States

Army, of San Bernardino, California, who led his squad

in a daring attack on a North Korean strongpoint in

which he raced 60 yards through enemy fire and singlehandedly wiped out five gun emplacements, leading to

the rout of the enemy;

(5) Private First Class Robert H. Jenkins, Jr.,

United States Marine Corps, of Interlachen, Florida,

who while serving in Vietnam sacrificed himself to save

a fellow Marine from a North Vietnamese grenade; and

(6) the soldiers interred in the Memorial Amphitheater at Arlington National Cemetery, and those thousands that are not named;

Whereas too often the Nation allows the remarkable sacrifice

and valor of such individuals to fade from memory; and
3

•HCON 252 IH

Whereas postage stamp series have been commissioned in the

past to honor other significant elements of American culture and history: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) a series of postage stamps should be issued

4 in recognition of recipients of the Congressional

5 Medal of Honor; and

6 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee of

7 the United States Postal Service should recommend

8 to the Postmaster General that such a series of post9 age stamps be issued.

Æ
III

Calendar No. 333

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 339

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 13, 2002

Received and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

MARCH 21, 2002

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the Bureau

of the Census on the 100th anniversary of its establishment.

Whereas this Nation’s Founding Fathers mandated that a

census be conducted once every 10 years, and the decennial census remains the only constitutionally mandated

data collection activity today;

Whereas the Congress established a permanent ‘‘Census Office’’ in the Department of the Interior on March 6,

1902, and, in 1903, transferred that office to what was

then the newly established Department of Commerce and

Labor (within which, with more than 700 employees, it

comprised the largest of that department’s new bureaus);

Whereas Federal, State, and local governments use data collected by the Bureau of the Census in the distribution of
2

•HCON 339 RS

funds and in the formulation of public policy in such

areas as education, health and veterans’ services, nutrition, crime prevention, and economic development, among

others;

Whereas the Bureau of the Census supplies statistical data

to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Board of Governors of the Federal

Reserve System, and other Government agencies charged

with measuring and reporting on the health of the Nation’s economy;

Whereas the Bureau of the Census is the Nation’s largest

data collection agency, collecting data used by other Government agencies, tribal governments, institutions, universities, and nonprofit organizations, and supplying information on poverty, unemployment, crime, education,

marriage and family, and transportation;

Whereas, throughout its first 100 years, the Bureau of the

Census has earned a reputation for scrupulously safeguarding the confidentiality of respondents’ answers, a

responsibility vital to maintaining the public’s trust;

Whereas the Bureau of the Census, with the cooperation of

other Government agencies, the Congress, State and local

governments, and community organizations, and with significant technological innovation and public outreach, has

just conducted this Nation’s 22d decennial census in a

timely and professional fashion, employing over 500,000

dedicated Americans in the process; and

Whereas March 6, 2002, marks the 100th anniversary of the

establishment of the Bureau of the Census: Now, therefore, be it
3

•HCON 339 RS

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress hereby—

3 (1) recognizes the 100th anniversary of the es4 tablishment of the Bureau of the Census; and

5 (2) acknowledges the achievements and con6 tributions of the Bureau of the Census, and of its

7 current and former employees, to the United States.
Calendar No. 333

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 339

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the

Bureau of the Census on the 100th anniversaryof its establishment.

MARCH 21, 2002

Reported without amendment
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 67 (Friday, April 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8291]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Prospective Grant of Exclusive License: Family Healthware

AGENCY: Technology Transfer Office, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(e) and 37 
CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i) that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
(CDC), Technology Transfer Office, Department of Health and Human 
Services (DHHS), is contemplating the grant of a worldwide, exclusive 
license to practice the inventions embodied in the patent application 
referred to below to Sanitas Inc., having a place of business in La 
Jolla, California. The patent rights in these inventions have been 
assigned to the government of the United States of America. The patent 
application(s) to be licensed are:

    US Patent Application 11/815,445 entitled ``Personal Assessment 
Including Familial Risk Analysis for Personalized Disease Prevention 
Plan,'' filed 5/20/2008, claiming priority to Provisional Patent 
Application No. 60/650,076, filed 2/3/2005. CDC Technology ID No. I-
004-04.

    Status: Patent Application Pending.
    Priority Date: 2/3/2005.
    Issue Date: N/A.
    The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will 
comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.
    Technology: This technology provides a computer-based familial risk 
assessment tool. It involves a three-step process which uses the 
disease history of a person's first and second-degree relatives to 
assess the risk of common diseases of adulthood in order to influence 
early disease detection and prevention strategies.

ADDRESSES: Requests for a copy of this patent application, inquiries, 
comments, and other materials relating to the contemplated license 
should be directed to Donald Prather, J.D., Ph.D., Technology Licensing 
and Marketing Specialist, Technology Transfer Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 4770 Buford Highway, Mailstop K-
79, Atlanta, GA 30341, Telephone: (770) 488-8612; Facsimile: (770) 488-
8615. Applications for a license filed in response to this notice will 
be treated as objections to the grant of the contemplated license. Only 
written comments and/or applications for a license which are received 
by CDC within thirty days of this notice will be considered. Comments 
and objections submitted in response to this notice will not be made 
available for public inspection, and, to the extent permitted by law, 
will not be released under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 
552.

    Dated: March 27, 2012.
Tanja Popovic,
Deputy Associate Director for Science Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012-8291 Filed 4-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Exhibit 10.1


 


 


 


May 18,
2022


 


 


 


To: Relland Winand


 


Re: Stay Bonus


 


Dear Relland,


 


You have given Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc.
(“IS&S”) notice of your intention to terminate your employment. IS&S and you have agreed that your employment will
continue until IS&S hires a new CFO, and you transition your responsibilities to him/her, or until December 30, 2022, whichever
occurs first (“Retirement Date”).


 


In recognition of your willingness to continue your
employment until your Retirement Date, IS&S will pay you a cash lump sum in the amount of $100,000 (“Stay Bonus”)
as soon as practicable following your Retirement Date. The Stay Bonus will be subject to all applicable federal, state and local withholding
obligations and taxes. Additionally, IS&S will provide you company-paid medical coverage for an additional month following your
Retirement Date, (i.e., if you retire in August, IS&S will pay your medical coverage through the end of September).


 


In the event your employment is terminated for any
reason prior to your Retirement Date, no Stay Bonus will be paid to you.


 


This letter agreement is not a contract of employment
and does not alter your “at-will” employment status. This letter agreement constitutes the entire agreement between you and
IS&S with respect to the subject matter described herein and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings and arrangements, both
oral and written, between you and IS&S with respect to such subject matter.


 


This letter agreement shall be governed, interpreted
and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania without giving effect to its rules governing
conflicts of laws.


 


If the preceding is acceptable to you, please acknowledge
and agree by signing where indicated below and returning this letter agreement to me.


 


We appreciate you agreeing to continue your employment
while we search for your replacement and your assistance in transitioning your responsibilities and duties.


 


720 Pennsylvania
Drive Exton, PA 19341


 






    


     


    

 


 


 


Should you have any questions please let me know.


 


Regards,


 


	 	/s/ Shahram Askarpour
	 	Shahram Askarpour
	 	CEO
	 	 
	 	ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:
	 	 
	 	/s/ Relland Winand
	 	Relland Winand
	 	 
	 	Date: May 18, 2022




 


720 Pennsylvania
Drive Exton, PA 19341
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL


FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report of Profire Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew Limpert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.











Date:
March 17, 2011

By:
/s/ Andrew LimpertAndrew LimpertChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
..: 

“_ 

\ 

-..... 

.OFFICEOFTHEAATTORNEY GENERALOFTEXAS 

AUSTIN 

- 

=""=e - 

._ 

Honorable Beu J. Dean 

District *V,toriley 

'BreckenriQe, Texas . . 

POW? T8qUoSt for 

car8ftil.y corisl~ereil bythis 

-your request as fqlkysr 

'aounty business', bnt it 

I% shoulc? be &V8Ii a broad 

tio9 DO as not So aeffm th6 

11 Tex. Jr. 535 [sec. 38). 

n 5, idi& 165a,. chapter337, ’ 

1935, 44th Legislature, thare was ' 

conferred qon the Comissis,?erst Court of the 

.- 

.* 
\ 

. 

Honorable Ben 3. Dkan~, 3?Sg;o 2 

several. counties tho authority to provide for 

the construction of iqmwe3ei3ts on lafids lying 

within their cwnties in the nature of fam 

terraces, etc. .* 

Wider 3. B. l+94,'~Gcneralnd Special La&s 

of n3xa3, 1;7ts Legislature, 1941, psgo 604, thee -. 

Oomissionei-8' Court is given the poxw to red 

to wa-ocnOr3 road nachinexy for~the..comtruction of terraoas, etc.., in cowtics of n po?ul.ationi%02 60,000 to 80,000; aaa unaer Article I.65 

a-5, I{, S.,: this sam power is given in counties 

containi& 290,000 to 320,000; cna udqr hrticle 

-165 n-6, ii. S.,, th8 Saole po'%ir i3 i$v83I t0 the 

C?omiSsio~ers~ Court of counties with a population 

* of 320,000 t0,,360.*000*~ 

-It thw a;ypears that the lcgielativs oon- ' 

&motion of th0 powers .of the Com.dSSionersl Coust 

is that the Gomissioners* Court does not have any 

pow&to grant or .bargcin the use of rod machinery 

for any private ppurpo~ss, but the saEe CBIL be used. 

only in the maintemnce and otinstruction of public 

roaas. 

UDuring the war emrgency, in the construction 

of airports.and OthGX public faoilities, request 

bas been.xmdo by contractors of the County Conzi.ssioners' Court for the use of rood nacM.nery belon&ng to the comty u.Mer contract providing for 

aaoquate~ooqensation for Such use.' 

"It nay be aSsumd, at leaot for the periOd 

of the emergency, that road mchir,erg now on 

hana me6 lant the oountios until the onergcnoy 

io~over end thct if the sme is worn out on.othor 

projects other than the county road syoton that 

tho county my be left vrithout anymchincry with 

whioh to work the roads. . 
. . 

. 

i 

IIonorable Bon J. Dean, Page 3 

- 

KC shotad. like to .ask you the following 

qu0nti0&3: 

: n(a) Do83 tho County Comissione~s~ Couxt 

have the powor to nake a rental. contract with a 

private contraotor engagea in govomiient work 

for thho use of road mchinery on' suoh %orH 

'I(b) iloss the Coimissioners~ Court have the 

power to mko a contract with a private oontracto:: 

for the use of its road naohinery to be shippea 

out OF t50~Stat.e of Texas ana usea in comtwction 

wo'rk?l~ 

Unaer the aut3orities oitoa in O@ions X0. 

0-2034 ana o-3228 of this aepirt0m, copies of which 

arp enolosed herewith for your InSorm~ion we ansmr 

eqoh of your questions io .the negative, ., 

: Yo&s very' truly 

. 

m. J. Pannin$ 

Assistant
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification ofChief Executive Officer of GFI Group Inc.Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of GFI Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Gooch,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:November 13, 2006

| /s/ MICHAEL  GOOCH        |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Michael Gooch             |   |
| *Chairman of the Board*   |   |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |   |

 

----