alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1588

_____________________________

URANA HARRIS,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL 

REGULATION,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

May 3, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and RAY and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Marie A. Mattox and Ashley N. Richardson, of Marie A. Mattox, 

P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Jamie Ito of Ito Law PLLC, Tallahassee, and Joseph Y. Whealdon 

III, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.
## 2009 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

5-20-2009 

# U SA v . J ones
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 07-2798

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2009 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min
. C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du

. 

## Re c omme nde d C it at ion

" U SA v . J one s " (2009). 2009 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1348. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009/1348

## UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 07-2798

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. PRESTON JONES a/k/a Death Preston Jones, Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. Criminal Action No. 2-03-cr-00844-023) District Judge: Honorable Katharine S. Hayden
Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge , AMBRO, and SMITH, Circuit Judges O R D E R The non-precedential opinion filed March 23, 2009 is hereby VACATED. The motion by Appellee to publish the panel opinion is granted and will be filed forthwith. It is noted that Appellant filed a petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc on May 18, 2009. As the March 23, 2009 opinion is vacated, the request for rehearing is dismissed as moot. Should the parties wish to seek review of the precedential opinion of the Court, the procedures to do are set forth in Fed. R. App. P. 35 and 40. By the Court /s/ Thomas L. Ambro Circuit Judge Dated: 20 May 2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KAMIL BROWN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 426 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
EX-10.1






	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Named Executive Officer	 	2005 Base Salary	 	2006 Base Salary
	1. Kenneth W. Davidson
	 	$	440,000	 	 	$	455,000	 






	 	 	 	 	 
	Named Executive Officer	 	2005 Base Salary
	1. Paul Chapman
	 	$	300,000	 
	2. Jack Cahill
	 	$	233,000	 
	3. Scott Klosterman
	 	$	190,000	 
	4. Harry L. Zimmerman
	 	$	220,000
**Exhibit 10.8**

AMENDMENT 

TO THE 

MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 

BY AND BETWEEN 

JER INVESTORS TRUST INC. 

and 

JER COMMERCIAL DEBT ADVISORS, LLC 

This AMENDMENT No. 2 to the ManagementAgreement, dated as of June 4, 2004 (the “Management Agreement”), by and between JER Investors Trust Inc., a Maryland Corporation (the “Company), and JER Commercial Debt Advisors, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the“Manager”), is made as of this 1st day of January 2006, between the Company and the Manager. Capitalizedterms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Management Agreement. 

W I T N E S S E TH: 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Manager are parties to the Management Agreement; and 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Manager desire to amend the Management Agreement in the manner and as more fully set forth herein; and 

WHEREAS, as permitted by Section 17(d) of the Management Agreement, the parties hereto have consented to amending the Management Agreement in themanner and as more fully set forth herein; 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promise and agreements herein and intending tobe legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

1. Amendment to Section 9(b)(xxi). Section 9(b)(xxi) of theManagement Agreement is is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

*“(xxi)*subject toannual review by the Company’s Board of Directors, the Company’s pro rata portion of rent, telephone, utilities, office furniture, equipment, machinery and other office, internal and overhead expenses of the Manager and its Affiliatesrequired for the Company’s operations in the fixed amount of (x) $500,000 per annum for calendar year 2006 and (y) for calendar year 2007 and each calendar year thereafter, $500,000 multiplied by sum of (a) one (1) plus(b) the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”)for the applicable calendar year over the over the CPI for the calendar year 2006. ‘Consumer Price Index’ or ‘CPI’ shall mean the Consumer Price Indexfor All Urban Consumers as determined by United States Department of Labor.” 

 

*2*. Ratification: Except as modified pursuant to this Amendment, the Management Agreement isratified and confirmed in all respects. 

 

[rest of page intentionallyleft blank] 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 2 to the ManagementAgreement effective as of the date first above written. 

 
JER INVESTORS TRUST INC.By: /s/ Mark Weiss 
Name: Mark Weiss

Title:  President

 

 

 

JER COMMERCIAL DEBT ADVISORS, LLC
By: /s/ Daniel T. Ward 
Name: Daniel T. Ward

Title:   Sr. ManagingDirector
[No. 19058-3-II.

Division Two.

August 2, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Lavan Arthur Lukes, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clal-lam County, No. 94-8-00265-6, William Knebes, J. Pro Tern, entered December 14, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, A.C.J., concurred in by Bridgewa-ter and Armstrong, JJ.
EXHIBIT 10.1


SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS


All executive officers of
the Company are “at will” employees. Currently, other than “Change in Control”
agreements, which agreements were discussed in our most recent definitive Proxy
Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which information is
incorporated in this exhibit by reference, we do not have any written or oral
employment arrangements with any of our executive officers.


Current
Executive Officer Annual Base Salary


The
table below summarizes the current annual base salary being paid to each of our
current named executive officers. All compensation arrangements between officer
and the Company are subject to oversight and approval of our Compensation
Committee, and may be modified from time to time.


	
  Name and Title

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Annual Base Salary as of

  June 30, 2005

  	
   

  
	
  Steven J. Goldman

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  520,000

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Chairman and Chief Executive
  Officer

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  William T. Yeates

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  350,012

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  President and Chief Operating Officer

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Brad W. Godfrey

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  275,000

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  President, Embedded Products

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  William
  Franciscovich

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  235,040

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Randall H. Holliday

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  235,040

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Secretary and General
  Counsel

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Paul E. Ross

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  190,000

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Vice President—Finance, Treasurer and Chief
  Financial Officer

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Veronica Tarrant

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  190,000

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Vice President—Finance and
  Chief Accounting Officer

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


Other
Compensation Arrangements for Officers and Directors


Other information regarding bonus eligibility, outside
director compensation arrangements, and other compensation entitlements is set
forth in our most recent definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, which information is incorporated in this exhibit by reference.
[No. 36568-1-I.

Division One.

June 3, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. David L. Nixon, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-1-07816-6, Arthur E. Piehler, J., entered April 24, 1995. *Dismissed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 415 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 415

    Recognizing National Homeownership Month and the importance of 
                  homeownership in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 2002

Mr. Gary G. Miller of California (for himself and Mr. Oxley) submitted 
    the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Recognizing National Homeownership Month and the importance of 
                  homeownership in the United States.

Whereas the President has issued a proclamation proclaiming June 2002 as 
        National Homeownership Month;
Whereas owning a home represents the American dream for our Nation's families;
Whereas the national homeownership rate has increased to 67.8 percent, higher 
        than at any other time in history for all demographic groups, and 
        homeownership rates among minority families are increasing faster than 
        such rates for the population as a whole;
Whereas the purchase of a home is oftentimes a family's largest personal 
        investment;
Whereas homeownership provides economic stability and security for homeowners 
        and their communities by allowing homeowners to build wealth over the 
        life of the home and have a greater stake in local schools, civic 
        organizations, and churches;
Whereas improving homeownership opportunities requires the commitment and 
        cooperation of private, nonprofit, and public sectors, including the 
        Federal Government and State and local governments; and
Whereas the current policies of the United States Government and the Congress 
        encourage homeownership and should continue to do so in the future: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) fully supports the goals and ideals of National 
        Homeownership Month; and
            (2) recognizes the importance of homeownership in building 
        strong communities and families in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 3, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20006]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7826]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARCTIC RESEARCH COMMISSION


Reports and Updates on Programs and Research Projects

    Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Arctic Research Commission 
will hold its 97th meeting in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, on April 28, 
2012. The business session, open to the public, will convene at 8:30 
a.m.
    The Agenda items include:
    (1) Call to order and approval of the agenda.
    (2) Approval of the minutes from the 96th meeting.
    (3) Commissioners and staff reports.
    (4) Discussion and presentations concerning Arctic research 
activities.
    The focus of the meeting will be reports and updates on programs 
and research projects affecting the Arctic.
    If you plan to attend this meeting, please notify us via the 
contact information below. Any person planning to attend who requires 
special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign 
language interpreters, must inform the Commission of those needs in 
advance of the meeting.
    Contact person for further information: John Farrell, Executive 
Director, U.S. Arctic Research Commission, 703-525-0111 or TDD 703-306-
0090.

John Farrell,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-7826 Filed 4-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David M. Sankaran, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc.



|                        |  |  |  |        |  |                                                                                               
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 5, 2009 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/    DAVID M.
SANKARAN                                                                      
|                        |  |  |  | Name:  |  | David M. Sankaran                                                                             
|                        |  |  |  | Title: |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Hickson Leonard, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

December 4, 1958.

*Frank 8. Hogan, District Attorney,*for plaintiff.

*Joseph Kasoy*for defendant.

*905Aeon Stetjeb, J.

This is an application by a surety for an order directing the District Attorney to issue a certificate that the People lost no rights by reason of a forfeiture of bail and further directing the Comptroller to return the cash bail deposited by the petitioner less any legal fees due the City of New York on presentation of the order herein. The facts are that the surety deposited cash bail for one Leonard. On March 27, 1957 Leonard failed to appear for pleading and his bond was declared forfeited. On July 3, 1957 Leonard was brought before the same court on a bench warrant. His failure to appear was explained, apparently to the satisfaction of the court. The bond was reinstated and the forfeiture vacated. Some months later the defendant pleaded guilty and received a suspended sentence.

The District Attorney does not claim that the People lost any rights. The application is resisted on the ground that the application is made more than one year after the forfeiture, whereas the governing statute (Code Crim. Pro., § 598) fixes that as the period of limitation. He contends, correctly, that where the application is barred by limitations whether or not any rights were lost is immaterial. *(People*v. *Martin,*225 App. Div. 572.) This, however, loses sight of the fact that the forfeiture was vacated and the bond reinstated within the year. As the court was empowered to do this *(Matter of Quinn*v. *Shapiro,*284 App. Div. 894, affd. 309 N. Y. 829), the net effect is that thereafter the deposit was held as bail in effect rather than as bail that was forfeited. The limitation relied on does not affect the situation.

Motion granted.
III

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 416

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 25, 2002

Received and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Congratulating the Navy League of the United States on

the occasion of the centennial of the organization’s founding.

Whereas the Navy League of the United States was founded

in 1902 with the encouragement of President Theodore

Roosevelt to serve and support the United States sea

services, namely the Navy, Marine Corps, Coast Guard,

and Merchant Marine;

Whereas the Navy League has more than 77,000 active members;
2

HCON 416 RFS

Whereas the Navy League is unique among military-oriented

associations in that it is a civilian organization dedicated

to the education of American citizens and the support of

the members of the sea services and their families;

Whereas the Navy League supports active duty members of

the sea services through the adoption of naval vessels, installations, and units and the hosting of commissioning

ceremonies, award programs, and other recognition programs;

Whereas the Navy League supports America’s young people

through its youth programs, including sponsorship of the

Naval Sea Cadet Corps and the Navy League Scholarship

Program, and through its promotion of youth-oriented

activities in local communities, such as the Reserve Officers’ Training Corps and other recognized youth programs;

Whereas the Navy League is widely respected by citizens,

community and industry leaders, and public officials; and

Whereas Navy League programs are welcomed in communities throughout the United States, and members of the

Navy League are recognized for their integrity and patriotism: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress, on the occasion of the

3 centennial of the founding of the Navy League of the

4 United States in 1902, congratulates the Navy League

5 and its members for their role as the foremost civilian or-
3

HCON 416 RFS

1 ganization dedicated to supporting the United States sea

2 services.

Passed the House of Representatives June 24, 2002.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 480 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 480

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp 
    should be issued honoring our Nation's small business concerns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 24, 2002

 Mr. Langevin (for himself, Mr. Acevedo-Vila, Mr. Akin, Mr. Baird, Mr. 
Baldacci, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Ms. Berkley, Mr. Brown of Ohio, Mr. 
  Carson of Oklahoma, Mrs. Christensen, Mrs. Clayton, Mr. Cramer, Mr. 
 Davis of Illinois, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Frost, Mr. Grucci, Mr. Hefley, 
   Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Mrs. Kelly, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island, Mr. 
  McNulty, Mr. Manzullo, Ms. Millender-McDonald, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. 
 Pascrell, Mr. Peterson of Pennsylvania, Mr. Phelps, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, 
  Mr. Ross, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Skelton, Mr. Smith of Washington, Mr. 
   Tancredo, Mr. Udall of Colorado, Mr. Udall of New Mexico, and Ms. 
  Velazquez) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp 
    should be issued honoring our Nation's small business concerns.

Whereas there are approximately 25,000,000 small business concerns in the United 
        States;
Whereas our Nation's small business concerns bring new services and products to 
        the marketplace and provide business ownership opportunities to diverse 
        and traditionally underrepresented groups;
Whereas, according to statistics of the Small Business Administration, 2 out of 
        every 3 new jobs in the United States are created by small business 
        concerns;
Whereas small business concerns employ 54 percent of the national work force and 
        constitute over 99 percent of the Nation's employers;
Whereas small business concerns are the source of more than \1/2\ of our 
        Nation's technological innovations;
Whereas small business concerns generate an estimated 39 to 55 percent of the 
        Nation's gross national product; and
Whereas 51 percent of the private sector output and 96 percent of all exports 
        from the United States are attributable to small business concerns: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be issued by the 
        United States Postal Service honoring our Nation's small 
        business concerns; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1****POLYPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.****CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Polypore International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Robert B. Toth, President and Chief Executive Officerof the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: August 13, 2007  /s/ Robert B. Toth   Robert B. Toth   President and Chief Executive Officer