alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ruby Lee GRIGSBY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-0809.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 14, 1987.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tanja Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Jr., Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Deborah Guller, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

STONE, Judge.

Defendant was sentenced following a revocation of his probation. The score-sheet used in computing the guideline sentence included points for being under a legal constraint at the time of the offense. It is undisputed, however, that he was under no legal constraint at that time. In fact, the only restriction on defendant was the probation sentence imposed after the offense.

The state contends that a prior violation of this probation justifies an increase in the total points on the scoresheet. However, the status to be scored is any legal constraint that existed at the time of the offense for which he is scored.

Since no legal constraint existed at the time of the offense, we reverse the sen*796tence imposed and remand for resentenc-ing.

GLICKSTEIN, J., and BLOOM, PHILIP, Associate Judge, concur.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Ex parte Marina Urbina

Ap pellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 00 1 7 7

- C R

Trial court case number: 0 4 CR2126

- 83

- 1

Trial court: 405th District Court of Galveston County

Appellant, Marina Urbina, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s denial of her application for a writ of habeas corpus

. See T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art. 11.072 (West Supp. 2017). On April 17, 2018, we abated this appeal and remanded the case for the trial court to execute a certification of appellant’s right to appeal. The district clerk has filed a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certificat ion stating that the case “is not a plea bargain case, and the defendant has the right of appeal.” W e reinstate the case
on the Court’s active docket.

Further, t he record was due to be filed in th is Court by March 15, 2018

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 31.1

. A clerk’s record was filed on March 21 , 201 8

. Before we abate d this appeal , the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the C ourt might consider th e appeal

without a reporter ’s record unless , by April 12, 2018, appellant caused the record to be filed, or provided proof that she had arranged to pay for the record or is indigent

. See id. 31.1, 35.3(b), 37.3(c). Appellant has not responded , and a reporter’s record has not been

filed

. Accordingly, the Court will c onsider the appeal without a reporter’s record. See id. 31.1; s ee, e.g. , Ex parte Riaz , No. 01

- 17

- 00616

- CR, 2018 WL 326301, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 9. 2018, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: May 10, 2018
III 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 419

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2002

Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Requesting the President to issue a proclamation in observance of the 100th Anniversary of the founding of the 

International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies.

Whereas on September 17, 1902, when Theodore Roosevelt 

was President, 8 wildlife managers and game wardens 

from 6 States met in West Yellowstone, Montana, on behalf of the country’s beleaguered fish and wildlife populations, and established the National Association of Game 

and Fish Wardens and Commissioners, which later
2

HCON 419 RFS 

became the International Association of Fish and Wildlife 

Agencies (IAFWA);

Whereas 100 years later, IAFWA represents the fish and 

wildlife agencies of all 50 States and enjoys the membership of several Federal natural resource agencies, the 

Federal and provincial fish and wildlife agencies of Canada, and the Federal natural resource agency of Mexico; 

Whereas IAFWA has been a significant force in the enactment of fish and wildlife conservation treaties and Federal statutes too numerous to enumerate, including the 

Migratory Bird Treaty Act; the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act; the Dingell-Johnson Sportfish Restoration Act; all farm bills enacted since 1985; the North 

American Wetlands Conservation Act; the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, and the 

Fish and Wildlife Programs Improvement and National 

Wildlife Refuge System Centennial Act of 2000, to mention but a few; 

Whereas IAFWA continues to promote the sustainable use of 

natural resources; to encourage cooperation and coordination of fish and wildlife conservation and management at 

all levels of government; to encourage professional management of fish and wildlife; to develop coalitions among 

conservation organizations to promote fish and wildlife 

interests; and to foster public understanding of the need 

for conservation; and 

Whereas the State fish and wildlife agencies have successfully 

restored healthy fish and wildlife populations enjoyed by 

all Americans largely using Federal excise taxes paid by 

hunters and anglers into the Federal trust funds known 

as the Pittman-Robertson, Dingell-Johnson, and Wallop-
3

HCON 419 RFS 

Breaux trust funds, and using State hunting and fishing 

license fees: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) recognizes the significance of the centennial 

4 of the establishment of the entity that became the 

5 International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agen6 cies; 

7 (2) acknowledges the outstanding contributions 

8 of its member agencies to fish and wildlife conserva9 tion; and 

10 (3) requests the President to issue a proclama11 tion observing the 100th anniversary of the founding 

12 of the International Association of Fish and Wildlife 

13 Agencies.

Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 

2002. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
**DOCKET No. FAA -**  **2014 -**  **0653**


### Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? Organization Person Contacted Date Response Transport Canada Anthony W an

anthony. wan@tc.gc. ca@tc.gc.ca 2/26/14 3/10/2014: No Objection

Bom bardi er Aerospace Chester Liburski

(514) 855
- 5001 X 29036 Chester.Liburski@a ero.bombardier.com, 3/3/14 3/06/2014: No Objection

RAA Scott Foose

(202) 367
- 1212 2/26/14 No Objection received
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 06712

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

06712\06712_Certification Statment.pdf Plant certification statement

x 06712\06712_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

06712\06712_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

06712\06712_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 06712\06712_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06712\06712_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06712\06712_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

06712\Supporting Documents\06712_Coverletter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

06712\Supporting Documents\06712_Part A Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06712\Supporting Documents\06712_Part A Map-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06712\Supporting Documents\06712_Part A WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06712\Supporting Documents\06712_Part A WB-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
EXHIBIT
32


SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATIONS





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John C. Roman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Lee R. Schlesinger,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of the date
and for the period covered by the Report.








/s/ John C.
Roman


John C.
Roman


President
and Chief Executive Officer


(principal
executive officer)





/s/ Lee R.
Schlesinger


Lee R.
Schlesinger


Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


(principal
financial officer)








Date:
August 5, 2008
file:///P|/Steam/Sampling/Plant%20Selection/Questions%20for%20Plants/Final%20Versions/Big%20Bend/New%20Text%20Document.txt [1/21/2010 9:43:44 AM] From: Kurtis Blohm [mailto:Kurtis.Blohm@erg.com] Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 12:38 PM To: Young, Kevin A. Cc: Hall.Josh@epamail.epa.gov; Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov; Deborah Bartram; Thomas Finseth Subject: Follow Up Questions on Big Bend's FGD Wastewater Treatment System Kevin, Thank you for answering my questions regarding the Big Bend plant last week. As we discussed during the call, EPAwould like to confirm the operation of the FGD systems and FGD wastewater treatment systems at Big Bend. This upto-date information will be used by EPA to make decisions about which plants and systems to select for the sampling episodes as part of the rulemaking. I am attaching a list of follow-up questions from our call. We would appreciate receiving responses to these questions by Friday, December 11th. As noted in the questions, please identify if any information should be handled as confidential business information. Please let me know if you have any questions. Additionally, you can contact Josh Hall via e-mail (hall.josh@epa.gov) or by phone (202-566- 1002) if you have any questions. Thanks for your time, Kurt

Kurt Blohm Chemical Engineer Eastern Research Group, Inc. 14555 Avion Pkwy, Suite 200 Chantilly, VA 20151 (703) 633-1675
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION





PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B)





OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EPL Intermediate, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), I, Stephen J. Sather, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date: May 11, 2011




/s/ Stephen J. SatherStephen J. Sather

President and Chief Executive Officer

EPL Intermediate, Inc.






This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EPL Intermediate, Inc. and will be retained by EPL Intermediate, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
exv10w2



 






EXHIBIT 10.2




SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR CASH COMPENSATION




     Each non-employee director receives an annual retainer of $80,000, and the Chairman of the
Board, if a non-employee director, receives an additional annual retainer of $80,000. In addition
to the annual retainer, non-employee directors who serve as the Chairman of the Audit Committee,
the Venture Committee or the Technology Committee receive an annual fee of $40,000, and
non-employee directors who serve as the Chairman of the Compensation Committee or the Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee receive an annual fee of $20,000; provided, however, that no
committee chair fee is paid to a non-employee director who also serves as Chairman of the Board.
Non-employee directors are also paid $2,000 for each Board or committee meeting attended in person
and $1,000 for each Board or committee meeting attended by telephone or other electronic means. No
additional compensation is paid when the Board of Directors or a committee acts by unanimous
written consent in lieu of a meeting. Non-employee directors are eligible for reimbursement of
their expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board meetings in accordance with Cadence
policy.
## t PURPOSE AND SCOPE 

# •

• SPA 18 RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 157:

LandDisposal Restrictions Phase 

### IV RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 157
Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV-- Treatment Standards for WoodPreserving Wastes, PaperworkReduction and Streamlining, Exemptions FromRCRA for Certain ProcessedMaterials; and Miscellaneous Hazardous Waste Provisions 62 FR 25998-26040 May 12, 1997 (RCRA ClusterVII, HSWA provisions)

FEDERALREQUIREMENTS FEDERAL RCRACITATION ANALOGOUS STATECITATION STATE ANALOGIS:

WAC 173-303- EQUIV- LESS MORE BROADER ALENT STRlN· STRIN· IN SCOPE GENT GENT PART 261 -- IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SUBPART A - GENERAL

add new paragraph; 261.1(c)(9) 016(2)(1) and 040 

### X definition "Excluded scrap metal" add new paragraph; 261.l(c)(1O) 016(2)(m) and 040 

### X definition "Processed scrap metal" add new paragraph; 261.1(c)(II) 016(2)(n) and 040 

### X definition "Home scrap metal" add new paragraph; 261.l(c)(l2) 016(2)(0) and 040 

### X definition "Prompt scrap metal"



# • t DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE revise table 1; add 261.2(c)fTable 1 after entry for scrap metal "other than excluded scrap metal (see 261.1(c)(9»" also add "and 'processed scrap metal'" after "scrap metal" in Note. 016(5) Table 1

May 12, 1997 - Page 1 of 18 X

CL157.18 - Revised: 3f25198 Printed: 12119/01

### SPA 18 RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 157:

LandDisposal Restrictions Phase IV

# -------------------------~c-) t EXCLUSIONS add paragraph; 261.4(a)(l3) 071(3)(ff) X excluded scrap metal being recycled add paragraph; 261.4(a)(l4) 071(3)(gg) X shredded circuit boards being recycled provided that they are: add paragraph; stored 261.4(a)(l4)(i) 071(3)(gg)(i) X in containers sufficientto prevent release, and add paragraph; free of 261.4(a)(l4)(ii) 071(3)(gg)(ii) X mercury switches, mercury relays and nickel cadmium batteries and lithium batteries 

### t REQUIREMENTS FOR RECYCLABLE MATERIALS scrap metal; add "that 261.6(a)(3)(ii), 120(2)(a)(iv) X / is not excluded under 261.4(a)(13)" PART 268 -- LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS SUBPART A - GENERAL PURPOSE, SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY no change 268. 1(e)intro - (e)(3) 140(2)(a) X The State has incorporated part 268 by reference. 268.1(e) (intro) through 268 Appendix X are mR. The citations were deleted to save space and paper. APPENDIX VIII TO PART 268 NATIONAL CAPACITY LDR VARIANCES FORVICWASTES revise table as shown 268 Appendix

## vm 140(2)(a) X in 62 FR 26037-26039 EndofmR 

# C)

May 12, 1997 - Page 2 of 18 CL157.18 - Revised: 3125198 Printed: 12119/01 

## I

### SPA IS RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 157:

Land Disposal Restrictions Phase IV 

# ._----------- APPENDIX X TO PART 268 RECORDKEEPING, NOTIFICATION, AND/OR CERTIFICATION REQillREMENTS removed andreserved 268 Appendix X Removed and X reserved


### t Optional. 

### t

# * Conditionally optional. While the provisions indicated were optional when first added to the CPR, States which have chosen to adopt them must also adoptthe subsequentrevisions. The revisions, therefore, are considered conditionally optional.



# •

•

May 12, 1997 - Page 3 of 18 CLl57.18 - Revised: 3/25/98 Printed: 12119/01
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 171

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding graduated driver’s license

programs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 20, 2001

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey submitted the following concurrent resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding graduated

driver’s license programs.

Whereas teenage drivers have the highest rate of automobile

accidents of all age groups;

Whereas a graduated driver’s license program is a program

specifically designed to phase in driving privileges for new

drivers, allowing such drivers to gradually gain driving

experience under lower risk conditions;

Whereas more than 45 States have adopted some form of

graduated driver’s license program;

Whereas graduated driver’s license programs usually require

new drivers to complete a 3-stage licensing process, including (1) a supervised learner’s permit, (2) an intermediate license with restrictions, including restrictions re-
2

•HCON 171 IH

garding the number of passengers and nighttime driving,

and (3) an unrestricted driver’s license;

Whereas graduated driver’s license programs also include

other initiatives to promote driver safety, including advanced driver education, requirements regarding supervised behind-the-wheel experience, and mandatory seat

belt use for all passengers;

Whereas the use of a 3-stage graduated driver’s license program has demonstrated great promise in reducing the

number of accidents, injuries, and fatalities caused by

automobiles; and

Whereas many States have already established a graduated

driver’s license program and have experienced a reduction

in automobile-related accidents and fatalities among

young and inexperienced drivers: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) each State should—

4 (A) examine the benefits of establishing a

5 graduated driver’s license program if the State

6 has not yet established such a program; or

7 (B) fully monitor, review, and improve the

8 existing graduated driver’s license program of

9 the State;

10 (2) the National Highway Traffic Safety Ad11 ministration should continue its studies and pro12 grams regarding the effects of graduated driver’s li13 cense programs on improving automobile safety;
3

•HCON 171 IH

1 (3) the National Transportation Safety Board

2 should be commended for placing and keeping grad3 uated driver’s license programs on its list of most

4 wanted safety recommendations; and

5 (4) the American Automobile Association, the

6 Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the Na7 tional Association of Governors’ Highway Safety

8 Representatives, and other groups dedicated to auto9 mobile safety should be praised for their sustained

10 and successful efforts to educate the public regard11 ing the benefits of graduated driver’s license pro12 grams and for their successful efforts to establish

13 such programs in many States.

Æ
Exhibit 31.1

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Peter Reichard, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, of Design Source, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:   August 14, 2007 | PETER REICHARD                                                             
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        | Peter Reichard
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
[No. 17167-8-II.

Division Two.

July 12, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Steven Burden, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kit-sap County, No. 92-1-00287-4, James I. Maddock, J., entered May 3, 1993. *Affirmed in part*and *reversed in part*by unpublished opinion per Wiggins, J. Pro Tern., concurred in by Bridgewater, J., and Fleisher, J. Pro Tern.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and
    
    the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Amerisa KornblumAmerisa KornblumChief Financial Officer
#### James JOHNSON, Jr. v. CITY OF BATON ROUGE and Donald Evans.

No. 87-C-1111.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Johnson, James Jr.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA86 0149; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “H”, No. 243177.

Prior report: La.App., 506 So.2d 882.

Denied.