alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1





Section 1350
Certification


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code)





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Symmetry Medical Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Corporation”), does hereby certify that:





The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter and six months ended July 4,
2009 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Corporation fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.





August 7,
2009


/s/
      Brian S. MooreBrian
      S. MooreChief
      Executive Officer/s/
      Fred L. HiteFred
      L. HiteChief
      Financial Officer
|   | 1. | I      am the President and Chief Executive Officer of Neurogen Corporation      (the "Company"). |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To      the best of my knowledge: |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------|

|   | a. | The      Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007      accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and      Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the      "Exchange Act"); and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b. | The      information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date: March 17,      2008 | By:      /s/ Stephen R. Davis                             |
|---------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                            | ------------------------                                  |
|                            |                                                      |
|                            | Stephen      R. Davis                                     |
|                            | President      and Chief Executive Officer                |
|                            | and      Principal Financial and Accounting Officer  |
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**INTERLINE BRANDS, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Interline Brands, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 1, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Michael J. Grebe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| /S/ MICHAEL J. GREBE                  |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael J. Grebe                      |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 11, 2005                  |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### In the Matter of P.S., D.O.B. 12/20/66, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

No. 6870.

Court of Appeals of Alaska.

Dec. 30, 1982.

Thomas E. Fenton, Fairbanks, for appellant.

Rhonda F. Butterfield, Asst. Atty. Gen., Office of Sp. Prosecutions and Appeals, Anchorage, and Wilson L. Condon, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellee.

Before BRYNER, C.J., and COATS and SINGLETON, JJ.

OPINION

SINGLETON, Judge.

The state petitioned in the superior court seeking an adjudication that P.S. was a *1320delinquent. *See, e.g.,*AS 47.10.010(a). The petition alleged that P.S. had solicited another to commit theft in the second degree in violation of AS 11.31.110. Theft in the second degree is a class C felony. AS 11.-46.130(b). Consequently, solicitation to commit theft in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor. AS 11.31.110(c)(4). P.S. requested a twelve-person jury. The trial court, determining that the conduct charged in the petition would have been a misdemeanor if P.S. were an adult, concluded that only a six-person jury was warranted. Trial was held. The six-person jury found P.S. guilty and he was adjudicated a delinquent. He appeals contending that he was entitled to a twelve-person jury. We agree and reverse.

Article 1, § 11 of the Alaska Constitution provides in relevant part:

> In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of twelve, except that the legislature may provide for a jury of not more than twelve nor less than six in courts not of record.

In *R.L.R. v. State,*487 P.2d 27, 32 (Alaska 1971), the court held that the term “criminal” prosecution in the constitutional provision includes “any offense a direct penalty for which may be incarceration in a jail or penal institution.” The court went on to hold that when a child in a delinquency proceeding is charged with acts which would be a crime, subject to incarceration if committed by an adult, the Alaska Constitution guarantees him the right to a jury trial.

In *Lopez v. Anchorage,*597 P.2d 146, 147-48 (Alaska 1979), the supreme court defined “courts not of record” to mean “courts of limited jurisdiction, such as the district court, which have been created by the legislature pursuant to constitutional authority and which the legislature has not seen fit to designate specifically as ‘courts of record.’ ” Under this definition, the “superior court” is clearly a court of record. 597 P.2d at 148. Consequently, since P.S. was involved in a criminal proceeding and tried in a court of record, he was entitled to a twelve-person jury.

The judgment of the superior court is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED for a new trial.
# Az Európai Unió C 123A/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0979 |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 123A |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 63. évfolyam2020. április 16. |

ISSN 1977-0979

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 123A

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

63. évfolyam2020. április 16.

---

| Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- |
| | Helyesbítések |
| 2020/C 123 A/01 | Helyesbítés nyílt versenyvizsga-felhíváshoz – EPSO/AD/375/20 – dán nyelvű (DA) jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/376/20 – görög nyelvű (EL) jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/377/20 – francia nyelvű (FR) jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/378/20 – horvát nyelvű (HR) jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/379/20 – lengyel nyelvű (PL) jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) ( HL C 72 A., 2020.3.5. ) | 1 |

Tartalom

Oldal

Helyesbítések

2020/C 123 A/01

Helyesbítés nyílt versenyvizsga-felhíváshoz – EPSO/AD/375/20 – dán nyelvű (DA) jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/376/20 – görög nyelvű (EL) jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/377/20 – francia nyelvű (FR) jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/378/20 – horvát nyelvű (HR) jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/379/20 – lengyel nyelvű (PL) jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) ( HL C 72 A., 2020.3.5. )

( HL C 72 A., 2020.3.5. )

1

---

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

Helyesbítések

| 16.4.2020 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CA 123/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2020

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CA 123/1

---

Helyesbítés nyílt versenyvizsga-felhíváshoz – EPSO/AD/375/20 – dán nyelvű (DA) jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/376/20 – görög nyelvű (EL) jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/377/20 – francia nyelvű (FR) jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/378/20 – horvát nyelvű (HR) jogász-nyelvész (AD 7) – EPSO/AD/379/20 – lengyel nyelvű (PL) jogász-nyelvész (AD 7)

(
  Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 72. A, 2020. március 5.
  )

(2020/C 123 A/01)

A 1. oldalon:

a következő szövegrész:

„A regisztráció határideje: 2020. április 7., brüsszeli idő szerint déli 12 óra”

helyesen:

helyesen:

„A regisztráció határideje: 2020. május 5., brüsszeli idő szerint déli 12 óra”

A 6. oldalon:

a következő szövegrész:

a következő szövegrész:

„A versenyvizsgára az EPSO honlapján http://jobs.eu-careers.eu lehet jelentkezni

2020. április 7., brüsszeli idő szerint déli 12 óra”

helyesen:

helyesen:

„A versenyvizsgára az EPSO honlapján http://jobs.eu-careers.eu lehet jelentkezni

legkésőbb 2020. május 5-én, brüsszeli idő szerint déli 12 óráig.”

---
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    Home





    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos

    Coronavirus Disease 2019





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    CSAF Reading List    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    2015 CSAF Reading List

    2014 CSAF Reading List

    2013 CSAF Reading List

    2012 CSAF Reading List

    2011 CSAF Reading List

    2010 CSAF Reading List

    2009 CSAF Reading List

    2008 CSAF Reading List

    2007 CSAF Reading List

    2006 CSAF Reading List

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Desert Storm 25th Anniversary

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2020

    Focus on Priorities





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers





    Contact Us  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (0.54 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR Act
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit
PROMISSORY NOTE








PROMISSORY NOTE




$500,000.00

March 16, 2004




This Full Recourse Promissory Note (the “Note”) is hereby tendered by China Ventures Incorporated, a Vancouver-based corporation (“Promissor”) to Wild Coyote Securities, a British Virgin Island limited liability corporation (the “Holder”).




1.    Obligation.    For value received, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Promissor hereby promises to pay to the order of the Holder on or before November 1, 2004 (the “Due Date”) the principal sum of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($500,000.00) with the interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum, plus any costs associated with this transaction.  Payments hereunder shall be made in lawful tender of the United States.




2.    Transaction Costs.    Promissor will be responsible for all out-of-pocket expenses borne by the Holder in relation to this transaction.  The only anticipated out-of-pocket expenses are bank telegraphic transfer fees.




3.    Event of Default.    Promissor will be deemed to be in default under this Note of payment of all amounts owing is not received on or before the Due Date.




4.    Remedies On Default.    In the Event of Default, at the option of the Holder, all amounts owed under this Note shall become due and payable, without notice or demand on the part of the Holder.  The Holder will have, in addition to it rights and remedies under this Note, full recourse against any real, personal, tangible or intangible assets of Promissor, and may pursue any legal or equitable remedies that are available to it.  Interest shall accrue from the Due Date on all unpaid amounts at the rate of the lower of two percent (2%) per month compounded monthly or the highest rate permitted by law.




5.    Prepayment.    Prepayment of principal and/or other amounts owed under this Note may be made at any time without penalty.




6.    Governing Law; Waiver.    The validity, construction and performance of this Note will be governed by the laws of the Province of British Columbia.




7.    Successor and Assigns.    This Note may not be transferred or assigned by Promissor.




8.    Modification; Entire Agreement.    This Note will not be amended without the written consent of both parties hereto.  This Note constitutes the entire agreement of the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings related to such subject matter.




9.    Attorneys’ Fees.  If suit is brought for collection of this Note, Promissor agrees to pay all reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees and travel expenses, incurred by the holder in connection therewith whether or not such suit is prosecuted to judgment.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Promissor and the Holder have each executed this Note as of the date and year first above written.




	Holder

Wild Coyote Securities Limited

	Promissor

China Ventures Incorporated


	 	 
	By: “Signed”

	By: “Signed”


	Director: Alexander Lau

	President: Ronald Shon
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 378

Commending the District of Columbia National Guard, the National Guard

Bureau, and the entire Department of Defense for the assistance provided to the United States Capitol Police and the entire Congressional

community in response to the terrorist and anthrax attacks of September

and October 2001.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 16, 2002

Mr. NEY (for himself and Mr. HOYER) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending the District of Columbia National Guard, the

National Guard Bureau, and the entire Department of

Defense for the assistance provided to the United States

Capitol Police and the entire Congressional community

in response to the terrorist and anthrax attacks of September and October 2001.

Whereas the terrorist and anthrax attacks of September and

October 2001 required Congress and the entire Congressional community to respond to a heightened state of

emergency;

Whereas the men and women of the United States Capitol

Police were required to shoulder the greatest burden of

this emergency response by working tremendously in-
2

•HCON 378 IH

creased hours under difficult conditions, requiring great

sacrifices by them and their families;

Whereas the District of Columbia National Guard responded

to the call of the Capitol Police Board and provided National Guard troops to assist the United States Capitol

Police in protecting the Capitol complex, providing great

relief to the members of the United States Capitol Police;

and

Whereas the combined efforts of the United States Capitol

Police and the District of Columbia National Guard have

made the Capitol complex secure for Members of Congress, Congressional employees, and visitors, and thereby

have enabled Congress to continue to discharge its constitutional duties on behalf of the American people: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress commends the District of Co3 lumbia National Guard, the National Guard Bureau, and

4 the entire Department of Defense for the assistance pro5 vided to the United States Capitol Police and the entire

6 Congressional community in response to the terrorist and

7 anthrax attacks of September and October 2001.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1805

JAMES H. DICKEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CITY OF HARTSVILLE; MEMBERS OF THE HARTSVILLE

CITY COUNCIL; WILLIE D. HERBERT, individually

and in his official capacity as city building

inspector; BUSINESS LICENSE INSPECTOR OF THE

CITY OF HARTSVILLE; WILLIAM F. BURTON, JR.,

individually and in his official capacity as

city manager of the City of Hartsville; MATT

CANARRELLA, individually and as Mayor of the

City of Hartsville,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge.

(CA-93-1117-3-23)

Submitted: April 22, 1997 Decided: May 2, 1997

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James H. Dickey, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Wilson Buyck, Jr., L.

Hunter Limbaugh, Robert Thomas King, WILLCOX, MCLEOD, BUYCK &

WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order and order on reconsideration denying relief in this civil action. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Dickey v. City of Hartsville, No. CA-93-1117-3-23 (D.S.C.

May 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 42

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the reappointment of Manuel L. Iba ́n

 ̃ez as

a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by

reason of the expiration of the term of Manuel L. Iba ́n

 ̃ 7 ez

8 of Texas on May 4, 2000, is filled by the reappointment

9 of the incumbent for a term of 6 years. The reappointment

10 shall take effect on May 5, 2000.

Passed the Senate April 12, 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 42

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the reappointment of Manuel L.

Iba

 ́

n

 ̃

ez as a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.
## On

**- Board Circulation and Seating Subcommittee** 

**- Ja**  **nuary 2015**

**On -**  **board Circulation and Seating Subcommittee Call (#12) 01/15/2015**  **U.S. Access Board: Rail Vehicles Access Advisory Committee Subcommittee for On**  **- board Circulation and Seating**  1. Introductions 1. Approval of the Agenda 2. Next Meeting 3. Review and discuss revisions to matrix a. Note 3 b. Note 5 c. Note 6b. d. Note 6d e. Note 22 4. Review Vertical Circulation 5. Items we missed? Last call. 6. Next Step(s): a. Draft report to the full committee : Volunteers? 7. Action Items 8. Assignments



### [Attachment]
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I,Frederick F. Wolfe, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report onForm 10-Q of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: November14, 2007

 
| /s/ Frederick F. Wolfe  |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
| Frederick  F. Wolfe     |
|                    |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----