alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

The McCarty Corporation ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W912HN-06-C-0074 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 57992 

Joseph P. Dirik, Esq. 

Fulbright & Jaworski LLP 

Dallas, TX 

William J. Wolf, Esq. 

Bugg & Wolf, P.A. 

Durham, NC 

Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Laura J. Arnett, Esq. 

Engineer Trial Attorney 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Savannah 

DISMISSAL ORDER 

The parties have settled their dispute. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 9 September 2014 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 57992, Appeal of The McCarty 

Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
#### Mary PIHAKIS, Appellant, v. Jordan MARSH, Appellee.

Nos. 87-1380, 87-1381.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 15, 1988.

Rubin, Rubin & Fuqua and Ellis Rubin and David M. Rappaport, Miami, for appellant.

Gaebe, Murphy & Mullen and Michael Murphy, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before BASKIN, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Despite having voluntarily dismissed the cause, counsel for appellant seeks reinstatement of the proceeding and review of the trial court's denial of his motion for continuance. Once counsel announced the voluntary dismissal on the record, objections to prior rulings were rendered moot. *See Randle-Eastern Ambulance Service, Inc. v. Vasta,*360 So.2d 68 (Fla.1978); Fla. R.Civ.P. 1.420(a)(l)(i). We reject the argument that the voluntary dismissal was coerced by the trial court’s insistence that trial commence.

Affirmed.
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 337

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas even though African-Americans were excluded from

playing in the major leagues of baseball with their Caucasian counterparts, the desire of some African-Americans

to play baseball could not be repressed;

Whereas African-Americans began organizing their own professional baseball teams in 1885;
2

•HCON 337 EH

Whereas 6 separate baseball leagues, known collectively as

the Negro Baseball Leagues, were organized by AfricanAmericans between 1920 and 1960;

Whereas the Negro Baseball Leagues included exceptionally

talented players;

Whereas Jackie Robinson, whose career began in the Negro

Baseball Leagues, was named Rookie of the Year in 1947

and subsequently led the Brooklyn Dodgers to 6 National

League pennants and a World Series championship;

Whereas by achieving success on the baseball field, AfricanAmerican baseball players helped break down color barriers and integrate African-Americans into all aspects of

society in the United States;

Whereas during World War II, more than 50 Negro Baseball

League players served in the Armed Forces of the United

States;

Whereas during an era of sexism and gender barriers, 3

women played in the Negro Baseball Leagues;

Whereas the Negro Baseball Leagues helped teach the people

of the United States that what matters most is not the

color of a person’s skin, but the content of that person’s

character and the measure of that person’s skills and

abilities;

Whereas only in recent years has the history of the Negro

Baseball Leagues begun receiving the recognition that it

deserves; and

Whereas baseball is the national pastime and reflects the history of the Nation: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress recognizes the teams and play-
3

•HCON 337 EH

1 ers of the Negro Baseball Leagues for their achievements,

2 dedication, sacrifices, and contributions to baseball and

3 the Nation.

Passed the House of Representatives September 19,

2002.

Attest:

Clerk.

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 337

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the teams and players of the Negro

Baseball Leagues for their achievements, dedication, sacrifices, and contributions to baseball andthe Nation.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 314 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 314

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2002

        Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the members of AMVETS for their service to the Nation and 
          supporting the goal of AMVETS National Charter Day.

Whereas on July 23, 1947, AMVETS (American Veterans of World War II, Korea, and 
        Vietnam) was chartered by the United States as a not-for-profit 
        corporation;
Whereas membership in AMVETS is open to veterans who have honorably served, or 
        are serving, in the Armed Forces, including the Coast Guard, National 
        Guard, and Reserves, during or since World War II;
Whereas the veterans of the Armed Forces have made great sacrifices to ensure 
        the peace and security of the United States;
Whereas the members of AMVETS are dedicated to providing important services to 
        their local communities and to their fellow veterans;
Whereas the motto of AMVETS is ``We fought together, now let's build together'';
Whereas the members of AMVETS consistently honor that motto through countless 
        hours of patriotic service, including providing services to hospitalized 
        veterans, assisting veterans with their problems regarding housing and 
        employment, marching in parades, participating in color guards and 
        burial details, and educating the Nation's youth;
Whereas the war on terrorism has emphasized the sacrifices that veterans have 
        made, and continue to make, for the benefit of the Nation;
Whereas AMVETS has designated July 23 as AMVETS National Charter Day; and
Whereas the goal of AMVETS National Charter Day is to raise public awareness 
        regarding AMVETS's commitment and service to veterans, the families of 
        veterans, and the Nation: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress recognizes the members of AMVETS (American Veterans of 
World War II, Korea, and Vietnam) for their service to the Nation and 
supports the goal of AMVETS National Charter Day.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 20, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Scott J. Miller, certify that:

       1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof U.S. Premium Beef, LLC;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financialreporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

     a) all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting.
[No. 13991-3-III.

Division Three.

July 25, 1996.]

#### Kathy Peterson, *Respondent,*v. Sunfair Chevrolet, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 93-2-00465-5, Michael W. Leavitt, J., entered April 1, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, J., concurred in by Sweeney, C.J., and Thompson, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 328 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 328

   Expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to coverage of 
   outpatient prescription drugs under the Medicare Program and with 
  respect to providing for appropriate new budget authority for such 
                               coverage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2002

 Ms. Kilpatrick  (for herself, Mr. Conyers, Ms. Norton, Mrs. Jones of 
  Ohio, Mr. Bonior, Mr. Payne, Ms. Kaptur, and Ms. Brown of Florida) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
 the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on 
 Energy and Commerce, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to coverage of 
   outpatient prescription drugs under the Medicare Program and with 
  respect to providing for appropriate new budget authority for such 
                               coverage.

Whereas the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2002 established 
        a reserve fund of $300 billion for a medicare outpatient prescription 
        drug program;
Whereas the rising costs of outpatient prescription drugs presents a great 
        financial hardship for seniors and disabled individuals and impairs 
        their overall well-being;
Whereas enactment of a medicare outpatient prescription drug plan that provides 
        for a comprehensive, universal, and voluntary drug program for medicare 
        beneficiaries is needed; and
Whereas Congress and the President have pledged to enact a meaningful medicare 
        prescription drug plan: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) an outpatient prescription drug benefit for medicare 
        beneficiaries under the medicare program should be enacted in 
        2002;
            (2) the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 
        2003 should include new budget authority for each of fiscal 
        years 2003 through 2008 to provide for coverage of outpatient 
        prescription drugs under the medicare program; and
            (3) the aggregate amount of that new budget authority for 
        fiscal years 2003 through 2008 under the concurrent resolution 
        on the budget should be $300,000,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
combustionsurvey

- Fw: Roundtable Comments

-- EPA Boiler MACT Reconsideration

-----Forwarded by Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/ 16/2011 03:33PM -----

To: Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA From: holly@wbrt.org Date: 07/15/2011 05:40PM Subject: Roundtable Comments -- EPA Boiler MACT Rec onsideration (See attached file: WBRT_Comments_CAABoilerMact_FIN AL.pdf)

Dear Mr. Shrager:

We appreciate the opportunity to submit comments in response to EPA's reconsideration of its "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Poll utants" Rule [ EPA–HQ–OAR–2002–0058; EPA–HQ–OAR–2006–0790; EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–0119; FRL–927 2–7] RIN 2060–AQ25; RIN 2060–AM44; RIN 2060–AO12.

Those comments are attached.

Best regards.

Holly Propst Western Business Roundtable

= From: Brian Shrager <Shrager.Brian@epamail.epa.gov> To: <combustionsurvey@erg.com> Date: 7/16/2011 3:34 PM Subject: Fw: Roundtable Comments

-- EPA Boiler MACT Reconsideration Attachments: WBRT_Comments_CAABoilerMact_FINAL.pdf Page 1 of 1

8/2/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpw ise\4E21AF8BDO

...
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 244 Agreed to House (ATH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 244

   Authorizing the printing of a revised edition of the publication 
                         entitled ``Our Flag''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 9, 2001

Mr. Ney (for himself and Mr. Hoyer) submitted the following concurrent 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

                            October 9, 2001

    Committee on House Administration discharged; considered under 
                 suspension of the rules and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Authorizing the printing of a revised edition of the publication 
                         entitled ``Our Flag''.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. PRINTING OF REVISED EDITION OF ``OUR FLAG''.

    A revised edition of the publication entitled ``Our Flag'', revised 
under the direction of the Joint Committee on Printing, shall be 
printed as a House document.

SEC. 2. NUMBER OF COPIES.

    (a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), there shall 
be printed a number of copies of the publication described in section 1 
as follows:
            (1) 250,000 for the use of the House of Representatives, 
        distributed in equal numbers to each Member of the House and 
        each Delegate and Resident Commissioner to the Congress.
            (2) 51,500 for the use of the Senate, distributed in equal 
        numbers to each Senator.
            (3) 2,000 for the use of the Joint Committee on Printing.
            (4) 1,400 for distribution to the depository libraries.
    (b) Alternative Number.--If the total printing and production costs 
of the number of copies provided under subsection (a) exceed $150,000, 
there shall be printed the maximum number of copies of the publication 
described in section 1 for which such total costs do not exceed 
$150,000, with distribution allocated in the same proportion as in 
subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Robert JOHNSON, Appellee.

No. 92-3180.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 6, 1993.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Barbara J. Wolfe, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse but certify the following question as one of great public importance:

> Whether the manufacture of crack cocaine by law enforcement officials for use in a reverse-sting operation constitutes governmental misconduct which violates the due process clause of the Florida Constitution, where the charge is solicitation to purchase, i.e. whether *Metcalf v. State,*614 So.2d 548 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), is correct?

Reversed.

HERSEY and KLEIN, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.
October 22, 2015

Christian Thomas

Proto Multimedia LLC

11 Greenbriar Lane

Amherst, NH 03031

Dear Mr. Thomas :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It expl ains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We received your June 22 , 2015 exemption request on behalf of Proto Multimedia, LLC filed

in D ocket No. FAA

- 20 15

- 33 7 4 , but we are unab le to process your request any further. Your

petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11 .81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from wh ich you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request , to

include the weight (a maximum weight, including payload, of 55lbs or less is requ ired) of

the unmanned aircraft system (UAS) you intend to use

.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html

. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63( d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at

least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If

you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

B rittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 443 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 443

 Expressing the sense of Congress supporting the 2002 World Basketball 
      Championship and welcoming the 16 national teams competing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 17, 2002

   Ms. Carson of Indiana (for herself, Mr. Visclosky, Mr. Pence, Mr. 
 Roemer, Mr. Souder, Mr. Buyer, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. Kerns, Mr. 
     Hostettler, and Mr. Hill) submitted the following concurrent 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress supporting the 2002 World Basketball 
      Championship and welcoming the 16 national teams competing.

Whereas the 2002 World Basketball Championship will be held from August 29, 
        2002, through September 8, 2002, in Indianapolis, Indiana;
Whereas 2002 marks the first time in the 50 year history of the World Basketball 
        Championship it will be held in the United States;
Whereas 16 national teams will be competing as part of the 62 game, 11 day 
        event;
Whereas the 2002 World Basketball Championship is expected to draw between 
        150,000 and 175,000 basketball fans from throughout the United States 
        and foreign nations; and
Whereas international sporting events such as the 2002 World Basketball 
        Championship play an important role in continuing to foster positive 
        international relationships and friendships between participating teams 
        and fans: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) supports the 2002 World Basketball Championship to be 
        held in Indianapolis, Indiana; and
            (2) welcomes the participating teams from Algeria, Angola, 
        Argentina, Brazil, Canada, China, Germany, Lebanon, New 
        Zealand, Puerto Rico, Russia, Spain, Turkey, Venezuela, and 
        Yugoslavia.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC (the Company) for the
quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Keefe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 5, 2008



/s/ David J. KeefeDavid J. KeefeChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
[No. 18422-2-II.

Division Two.

July 5, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Cary L. Ables, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grays Harbor County, No. 94-1-00086-4, F. Mark McCauley, J., entered June 27, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, A.C.J., concurred in by Turner and Armstrong, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00013-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.J.L., A.R.L., A.A.R., and B.N.G., Children

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-PA-02031

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the portion of the trial court’s judgment 

terminating appellant Ernestina’s parental rights to A.J.L., A.R.L., A.A.R., and B.N.G. is 

REVERSED and judgment is RENDERED denying the Department’s petition to terminate

Ernestina’s parental rights. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. 

The motion to withdraw filed by counsel for appellant Abel is GRANTED. 

SIGNED September 24, 2014.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice