alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Agreement to purchase Zvika Avni's Shares in Enertec Systems Ltd. In Exchange
for 1 Million shares in Lapis Technologies Inc.

Feb 22,2005

To : Mr Harry Mund, CEO,Lapis Technologies Inc , USA

Re : Receipt of Lapis shares in exchange for my shares in Enertec Systems Ltd
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Sir,

Following our discussion of today, I am putting in writing the principles of
what I agreed to, and subject to the receipt of an exemption (of a taxable
event) by the (Israeli) Income Tax Authority for this transfer :

      1.    I will transfer my shares of Enertec Systems Ltd, i.e. 18% (of
            Enertec Systems) which I currently own today to Lapis Technologies
            Inc. or its designee.
      2.    I agree that this agreement supersedes any prior negotiations or
            offers (regarding the number of shares I would receive in exchange
            for my ownership in Enertec.)
      3.    In exchange for my shares (in Enertec Systems) Lapis will allocate 1
            Million shares of Lapis Technologies Inc to me.
      4.    This agreement cancels any prior understanding, promise or
            agreement, written or verbal.

Sincerely


/s/ Zvika Avni
Zvika Avni
ALBA?;V , „lr WYOR K !2; > 3.242,22? i .'Vjw.aibcnvaii'portco

m Augus t 9 , 201 0 Mr . Wad e Davi s Ogdensbur g Bridg e Por t Authorit y Suit e 102 , 1 Bridg e Plaz a Ogdensburg , N Y 13669-229 9 RE : Docke t

No . DOT-OST-1997-284 2 

# —o

—t o >>:iH— 1 

## o Q

Dea r Mr . Davis : Th e Alban y Count y Airpor t Authorit y strongl y support s th e continue dEssentia l Ai r Servic e provide dt o th e Ogdensburg , Watertow nan dMassen aairport s b y Cap e Air . W e believ e tha t Cap e Ai r

i s bes t capabl e o f providin g reliable , cos t efFectiv e an duninterrupte dservic e t o busines s an dleisur e traveler s tha t rel y o n th e Ogdensbur g Airport . Inaddition . Cap e Air' s pla npropose s areasonabl e governmen t subsid y with realisti c fares . Toda y Cap e Ai r

provide s importan t

connectivit y t o th e Capita l Regio no f Ne w Yor k

State , asignifican t numbe r o f Ne w Yor k

Stat e college s an duniversitie s a s wel l a s direc t connection s t o Alban y Internationa l Airport' s 7 0 dail y commercia l light s t o 2 5 non-sto p destinations . Inaddition , Alban y i s serve db y Southwes t

Airlines , th e premie r

low-far e carrie r

i nth e Unite dStates . W e hav e bee n mos t

please dt o hav e Cap e Ai r a s amembe r

o f th e Alban y Team . Cap e Ai r ha s aprove n trac k recor do f

on-tim e performance , safet y an dafisca l strengt htha t include s ftill ownershi p o f it s ai r fleet . W e woul dno t

wan t t o repea t

th e hardshi p force dupo nOgdensbur g traveler s b y afaile dairline , a s occurre dwhe nfmancia l difficultie s force dBi g Sk y t o abando nservic e t o ou r Nort hCountr y airports . Thes e ar e importan t

factor s tha t

shoul db e thoroughl y considere dwhe nweighin g th e futur e performanc e ofanEA S cartier . Inaddition . Cap e Ai r

support s ou r

Ne w Yor k

econom y b y operatin g afull-servic e aircraf t maintenanc e facilit y a t Alban y Internationa l Airport . Unde r it s ne w proposal . Cap e Ai r wil l continu e t o suppor t th e Nort hCountr y b y maintainin g it s thre e dail y round-tri p flights t o Alban y an dexpan dtha t servic e t o includ e on e sto p servic e t o Boston . Inclosing , w e as k

tha t th e Ogdensbur g communit y joi nwit hth e Alban y Internationa l Airpor t b y full y supportin g th e choic e o f Cap e Ai r

a s th e mos t

beneficia l ai r

carrie r t o provid e Essentia l Ai r Servic e t o Ogdensburg , Watertow nan dMassen aairports . Sincerely , i nA . O'Donnel l Chie f Executiv e Office r JAO;g o
#### Charles W. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-258.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Sept. 3, 1987.

James Gibson, Public Defender, and Kenneth Witts, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Margene A. Roper, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment and sentence entered below are affirmed, but the cause is remanded for correction of a clerical error in the sentence which improperly ascribes the 25-year mandatory minimum sentence to the life felony instead of the capital felony.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.
[No. 35986-0-I.

Division One.

August 19, 1996.]

#### Kris Lewis Anderberg, Appellant, v. The Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-2-04988-7, Michael Spearman, J., entered December 30, 1994. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Ellington, J., concurred in by Kennedy, A.C.J., and Agid, J.
H. Con. Res. 32 Agreed to February 14, 2001

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of

Wednesday, February 14, 2001, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m.

on Monday, February 26, 2001, and that when the House adjourns

on Monday, February 26, 2001, it stand adjourned until 12:30

p.m. on Tuesday, February 27, 2001, for morning-hour debate,

or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to

reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or

adjourns at the close of business on Thursday, February 15, 2001,

or Friday, February 16, 2001, on a motion offered pursuant to

this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee,

it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, February

26, 2001, or until such time on that day as may be specified

by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess

or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members are

notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent

resolution, whichever occurs first.

SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader

of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority

Leader of the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall

notify the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively,
H. Con. Res. 32—2

to reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall

warrant it.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
Amended & Restated Registered Director's Agreement



 Exhibit 10.4 
  
 Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated 
  
 Registered Director’s Agreement 
  
 between 
  
 Rayovac Europe GmbH, 
  
 Innovapark A 4, Am Limespark 2, 65843 Sulzbach, Germany, 
  
 represented by its shareholder, Spectrum Brands Europe GmbH, represented by its sole managing director Andreas Rouvé, 
  
 - hereinafter referred to as the “Company” - 
  
 and 
  
 Mr. Rémy Burel, 
  
 Wiesbadener Str. 82, 61462 Koenigstein im
Taunus, Germany 
  
 - hereinafter referred to as the
“Registered Director” – 








	§ 1	Amendment 

  

	1.1	Effective April 1, 2005, the Registered Director entered into an Amended and Restated Registered Director’s Agreement (the “Service Agreement”).


  

	1.2	Effective April 1, 2005, the reference in Section 14.7(i) of the Service Agreement to the “36-month period” shall be changed to the “Non-Compete Period.”


  

	1.3	Other than the amendment set forth in Section 1.2 hereof, the Service Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

  

	1.4	This Amendment No. 1 and all legal disputes arising hereunder or in connection therewith are subject to the laws of the Federal Republic of Germany. 

  

			
	Dated: June 30, 2005	 	Dated: June 30, 2005
		
	 /s/ Andreas Rouvé

	 	 /s/ Rémy Burel


	Andreas Rouvé as sole managing director	 	Rémy Burel
	of Spectrum Brands Europe GmbH	 	 

  

	
	Approved:
	
	 /s/ Kent J. Hussey


	Kent Hussey

  

 - 2 -
EXHIBIT 31.1








RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) CERTIFICATION (SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)











I, Andrew J. McMonigle, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2021-4 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.








Date: May 26, 2023








/s/ Andrew J. McMonigle


Name: Andrew J. McMonigle


Title: Vice President and Treasurer


(Senior officer in charge of securitization)


Company: CarMax Auto Funding LLC


as Depositor on behalf of CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2021-4
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit 23.1


                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-60865) pertaining to the Hawk Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan, in
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-68583) pertaining to the Friction
Products Co. Profit Sharing Plan; S.K. Wellman Retirement Savings and Profit
Sharing Plan; Helsel, Inc. Employee's Retirement Plan; Helsel, Inc. Employee's
Savings and Investment Plan; Sinterloy Corporation 401(k) Plan; Hutchinson
Products LLC Employees' 401(k) Plan; and Hawk Corporation 401(k) Savings and
Retirement Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-47220)
pertaining to the Hawk Corporation 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan of our report
dated February 9, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Hawk Corporation and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 2000.


                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
March 23, 2001
-1-

\\ENTJUD0114\AdlibJobFiles\14a9a696-9deb-4ae8-ba04-b6f1220914e6\Input\0000-0000-1436-8305.docx

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No.: DA 24-0026

JAMES G. ARCHER, DENISE F. ARCHER, ROGER WAGNER, ANTOINETTE 

WAGNER, RUTGER NIERS, LAURA NIERS, GREGORY CHAPMAN, 

GREGORY SMITH, and LISA BRYANT,

Plaintiffs/Appellants, 

vs.

GORDON TAIT and MICHELLE JANZ,

Defendants/Appellees.

On Appeal from the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County

Cause No.: DV-23-640E, Hon. Danni Coffman

ORDER

Sean S. Frampton

FRAMPTON PURDY LAW FIRM

530 West 19th Street #301

Whitefish, MT 59937

Telephone: (406) 862-9600

Facsimile: (406) 862-9611

E-mail: sean@framptonpurdy.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellants

Bruce A. Fredrickson

Angela M. LeDuc

Taylor R. Miller

Rocky Mountain Law Partners, P.C.

1830 3rd Avenue East, Suite 301

P. O. Box 1758

Kalispell, MT 59903-1758

Telephone: (406) 314-6011

Facsimile: (406) 314-6012

E-mail: bruce@rmtlawp.com

angie@rmtlawp.com

taylor@rmtlawp.com

Attorneys for Defendants-Appellees

02/26/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0026
-2-

Based upon Appellees’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file 

their Response Brief, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellees shall file and serve their

Response Brief on or before April 8, 2024.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

February 26 2024
<PAGE>


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (333-51373), Form S-3 (333-51373); Form S-3 (333-51373),
of our report dated April 1999 on the consolidated financial statements of
Kaleidoscope Medial Group, Inc. and subsidiaries included in the 1998 Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB. We also consent to the reference to our Firm under the
caption "Experts" in the prospectuses.



/s/ Liebman Goldberg & Drogin

New York, New York
April 15, 2000
III

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 324

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 13, 2002

Received

APRIL 29, 2002

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan for

his leadership and friendship and welcoming him to the

United States.

Whereas President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan has

showncourageous leadership in cooperating with the

United States in the fight against terrorism;

Whereas President Musharraf has shown great fortitude in

confronting extremists and outlawing terrorism in Pakistan;
2

HCON 324 RFS

Whereas the efforts of President Musharraf in fighting terrorism are both in the national interest of Pakistan and

of great importance to Pakistani-American relations;

Whereas the war against terrorism underscores the importance of strengthening the historic bilateral relationship

between the United States and Pakistan;

Whereas President Musharraf has worked to improve the political representation of minorities in Pakistan; and

Whereas the Pakistani-American community in the United

States makes important contributions to the United

States and plays a vital role in developing a closer relationship between the peoples of the United States and

Pakistan: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress commends President Pervez

3 Musharraf of Pakistan for his leadership and friendship

4 and welcomes him to the United States.

Passed the House of Representatives February 12,

2002.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
391 A.2d 706

#### Commonwealth v. Zellers, Appellant.

Argued March 20, 1978.

George Gershenfeld, for appellant; F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

HOFFMAN and SPAETH, JJ., dissented on the basis that the lower court did not comply with Pa.R.Crim.P. 1123(c) in that it did not inform appellant of the necessity of filing specific motions in order to preserve his claims for appellate review. *Commonwealth v. Cathey,*477 Pa. 446, 384 A.2d 589 (1978); *Commonwealth v. Miller,*469 Pa. 370, 366 A.2d 220 (1976); *Commonwealth v. Brown,*248 Pa.Super. 289, 375 A.2d 102 (1977). Specifically, the lower court found appellant guilty, and immediately sentenced him without informing him of any of his appellate rights. See pages 39-41 of transcript (reproduced as Appendix D of appellant’s brief).
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 62 (Friday, March 30, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 19080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7819]



[[Page 19080]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 20


Estate Tax; Estates of Decedents Dying After August 16, 1954

CFR Correction

0
In Title 26 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 2 to 29, revised 
as of April 1, 2011, on page 392, in Sec.  20.2053-4, at the end of 
paragraph (c)(3), Examples 1-3 are added to read as follows:


Sec.  20.2053-4  Deduction for claims against the estate.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (3) * * *
    Example 1. There are three claims against the estate of the 
decedent (D) that are not paid and are not deductible under Sec.  
20.2053-1(d)(4) or paragraph (b) of this section: $25,000 of 
Claimant A, $35,000 of Claimant B, and $1,000,000 of Claimant C. The 
executor of D's estate (E) may not claim a deduction under this 
paragraph with respect to any portion of the claim of Claimant C 
because the value of that claim exceeds $500,000. E may claim a 
deduction under this paragraph for the total amount of the claims 
filed by Claimant A and Claimant B ($60,000) because the aggregate 
value of the full amount of those claims does not exceed $500,000.
    Example 2. There are three claims against the estate of the 
decedent (D) that are not paid and are not deductible under Sec.  
20.2053-1(d)(4) or paragraph (b) of this section; specifically, a 
separate $200,000 claim of each of three claimants, A, B and C. The 
executor of D's estate (E) may claim a deduction under this 
paragraph for any two of these three claims because the aggregate 
value of the full amount of any two of the claims does not exceed 
$500,000. E may not deduct any part of the value of the remaining 
claim under this paragraph because the aggregate value of the full 
amount of all three claims would exceed $500,000.
    Example 3. As a result of an automobile accident involving the 
decedent (D) and A, D's gross estate includes a claim against A that 
is valued at $750,000. In the same matter, A files a counterclaim 
against D's estate that is valued at $1,000,000. A's claim against 
D's estate is not paid and is not deductible under Sec.  20.2053-
1(d)(4). All other section 2053 claims and expenses of D's estate 
have been paid and are deductible. The executor of D's estate (E) 
deducts $750,000 of A's claim against the estate under Sec.  
20.2053-4(b). E may claim a deduction under this paragraph (c) for 
the total value of A's claim not deducted under Sec.  20.2053-4(b), 
or $250,000. If, instead, the value of A's claim against D's estate 
is $1,500,000, so that the amount not deductible under Sec.  
20.2053-4(b) exceeds $500,000, no deduction is available under this 
paragraph (c).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2012-7819 Filed 3-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
## NO. 12

- 22

- 00121

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

ROBERT F. CALDWELL

, APPELLANT

V.

WILLIAM R

. MOTAL, ET AL

, APPELLEE S §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 87TH

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORA N DUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

T his appeal is being di s missed for fa i lur e t o comply with the Tex as Rules of Appellate

Pro cedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).

A party who is not excused by statute or the appellate rules from paying costs must pay

--

at the time an i tem is presented for fil ing

-- w hatever fe es ar e required by st a tut e o r Texas

Supreme Court order. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5. An appellate court may enforce Ru l e 5 by any order

that is ju st. Id

. A fter giving ten days ’ notice , an appellate court may dismiss an a p peal because

the appellant faile d to compl y wit h a requirement o f t he appellate rules, a co urt order, or a notice

from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a speci fied time. T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.3(c).

On May 20 , 2022 , the Clerk of this Cou r t notified Appellant

, Robert F. Caldwell

, that th e

filing fee i n this a ppeal is due. Appellant w as informed th at failure to remi t t he f iling fee on or

before M ay 31 , wo uld result in the Cour t ’ s taking appropriate action, including dismissal of th e

case wi t hout further notice. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4 2.3(c)

. The date fo r remi tti n g the fi lin g feep assed, a nd Appell a nt h as not responde d to this C ourt ’ s n otice, paid the fil in g fee

, or otherwise

s how n that he is excu sed from paying the fee

. 1

Because Appellant f ailed, after notice, to comply with Rul e 5, the appeal is di sm issed

.

Se e T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c)

. Opinion deli vered June 1 6 , 2022.

Panel consis ted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

1 The case information sheet from the Anderson County District Clerk ’s O ffice ref l e cts that Appellant has not been declared indigent.

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWE L FTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JUNE 1 6 , 2022

NO. 12

- 22

- 00121

- CV

ROBERT F. CALDWELL

, Appellant

V.

WILLI AM R

. MOTAL, ET AL

, Appellee

Appeal from the 87th District Court

of Anderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 87

- 11264 )

THIS CAUSE c ame t o be heard on the appe llate r ec or d; and the same being

con sidered, it is the opinio n of this Court that this app eal sh ould be dismiss ed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Cou rt that

this appeal be, and the sam e is, her e by dismissed ; a nd that this decision be certif ie d to the court

below for ob servance.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Ne eley, J.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      of True North Energy Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
      ended July 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Folnovic, Principal Executive Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by Cthe Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/
              John FolnovicName:
              John FolnovicTitle:
              Principal Executive OfficerDate:
              September 13, 2007