alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Lawrence Lee, Chief Financial
      Officer of Synutra International, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his
      knowledge, that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months
      ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:
                August 8,
                2008
            
            
            
            /s/
                Lawrence LeeName:
                Lawrence LeeTitle: Chief Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished with the Company’s Report pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is
      not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
      made
      before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
      language in such filing.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C U IT R OM ILO M AEDA-GAR C IA; W ILFR EDO M AEDA, Pe titione rs, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 07-75039 Age n c y Nos. A077-381-966

A076-865-591 A076-865-592 A076-865-593 ORDER

B e fore : SC HR OEDER

and M . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s a n d B ENITEZ, * Distric t Judge . The m e m orandum

disposition file d on Se pte m be r 17, 2015 is a

m e nde d a s follows: R e pla c e the subm ission te xt on m e m oran dum disposition pa g e 1, line s 23- 24: Argue d a nd Subm itte d

August 4, 2011 ** Se attle , W a s hington 

# FIL E D OCT 20 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* The Honora

ble R oge r T. B e nite z , Unite d State s Distric t Judge for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia , sitting by de signa tion.W ith:
Subm itte d August 4, 2011 ** Se attle , W a s hington Subm i s sion Va c ate d a

nd De fe rre d August 2, 2011 R e subm itte d Se pte m

be r 15, 2015 The pe tition for pa

n e l re he aring is otherwise de nie d. Furthe r pe titions for re he aring a

nd re he aring e n ba

nc sha l l not be e nte rta ine d.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-51028 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RICARDO ARELLANO-CAMPOS, also known as Pedro Gonzalez-Hernandez, also known as Ricardo Arellano-Rivera, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CR-1123-ALL

- - - - - - - - - - February 15, 2001 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ricardo Arellano-Campos appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Arellano argues that his sentence should not have exceeded the two-year maximum sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Arellano acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000).No. 00-51028 - 2 - Arellano’s argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , 523 U.S. at 235. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is granted.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
EXHIBIT 32.2



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Symmetry Medical Inc. (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 2, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Fred Hite, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



August 5, 2005



/s/ Fred HiteFred HiteSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary




19
exv10w9w4



 






Exhibit 10.9.4




SCHEDULE OF PROMISSORY NOTES

Containing Provisions Set Forth in Forms of Promissory Note

Filed as Exhibit 10.9.2 and Exhibit 10.9.3




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Promissory Note No.	 	Type of Promissory Note	 	Date of Issuance	 	Principal Amount	 	Interest Rate
	1

	 	Equipment
	 	March 30, 2005
	 	$	1,601,828.65	 	 	 	10.65	%
	2

	 	Computers and
Software
	 	March 30, 2005
	 	$	513,384.10	 	 	 	10.65	%
	3

	 	Equipment
	 	May 4, 2005
	 	$	833,152.88	 	 	 	10.30	%
	4

	 	Computers and
Software
	 	May 4, 2005
	 	$	119,989.15	 	 	 	10.30	%
	5

	 	Equipment
	 	June 27, 2005
	 	$	127,664.50	 	 	 	10.23	%
	6

	 	Computers and
Software
	 	June 27, 2005
	 	$	63,560.15	 	 	 	10.23	%
	7

	 	Equipment
	 	July 27, 2005
	 	$	197,555.53	 	 	 	10.49	%
	8

	 	Computers and
Software
	 	July 27, 2005
	 	$	48,576.99	 	 	 	10.49	%
#### Theresa A. ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alan CHARNES, Director of the Department of Revenue, State of Colorado, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 82CA0478.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

Nov. 26, 1982.

*1319David Burnell Smith, Littleton, for plaintiff-appellant.

J.D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Deputy Atty. Gen., Joel W. Cantrick, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Roger R. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for defendant-appellee.

PIERCE, Judge.

Plaintiff’s driver’s license was revoked because she refused to take any chemical tests after she was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol. On review, the district court affirmed the revocation, and plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

Plaintiff was stopped by a police officer who had observed her driving in a very erratic manner. She was given roadside sobriety tests which she did not pass. Approximately one-half hour after her arrest, at the local police station, she refused to take a chemical test, after having been fully advised pursuant to the implied consent statute. Section 42-4-1202, C.R.S.1973. Approximately one hour and fifteen minutes later, she changed her mind and offered to submit to a test, but the police officer refused to have it administered.

At the administrative hearing for the revocation of her license, plaintiff failed to present evidence to negate the proposition that the long delay between her initial refusal and later consent would have materially affected the result of the test.

The facts and controlling law are not disputed in this matter. Plaintiff’s initial refusal to take the test was sufficient grounds upon which to revoke her license. *See Calvert v. Motor Vehicle Division,*184 Colo. 214, 519 P.2d 341 (1975). The law now, and at the time of this hearing, was settled. While a refusal to submit to a test may be cured by later consent, it is plaintiff’s burden to prove the delay would not have materially affected the results of the test. *Zahtila v. Motor Vehicle Division,*39 Colo.App. 8, 560 P.2d 847 (1977).

Our review of this record, plus plaintiff counsel’s full knowledge of the facts and his accurate understanding of the law, leads us to conclude this appeal is frivolous, *1320and was filed only to effect an unwarranted delay to the revocation of plaintiff’s license. Therefore, pursuant to C.A.R. 38, we assess attorney’s fees of $500 against plaintiff and in favor of defendants.

The judgment is affirmed.

COYTE and KELLY, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-832]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Grants for Injury Control Research Centers (Panel 
2), Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) CE12-001, Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned SEP:

    Time and Date: 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m., February 21-22, 2012 (Closed).
    Place: Crowne Plaza Atlanta Perimeter Hotel at Ravinia, 4355 
Ashford Dunwoody Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30346 Telephone: (770) 395-
7700.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in 
response to ``Grants for Injury Control Research Centers, Panel 2, 
FOA CE12-001''.
    Contact Person for More Information: Jane Suen, Dr. P.H., M.S., 
Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE., Mailstop 
F63, Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3724, Telephone (770) 488-4281.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: January 11, 2012.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012-832 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Services Partners Acquisition
      Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2008 (the
‘‘Report’’), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I, Avinash Vashistha, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice
      President of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      March 3, 2008




By:
              /s/
                Avinash VashisthaAvinash
                VashisthaChief
                Financial Officer and Executive Vice President(Principal
                Accounting and Financial Officer)
SERVED: September 12, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION 

FAA DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2013-0620 

ORDER DENYING MOTION 

13 

Respondent National Power Corporation ("Respondent") filed under Rule 218(f) of the 

Rules of Practice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions (14 CFR §13.218(f)) a Consolidated Motion for 

More Definite Statement, to Strike and Production of Documents ("Motion"). 1 Complainant 

Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") has answered, opposing the Motion.2 

Complainant also submitted an Amended Complaint. 

Respondent's Motion is DENIED. The Amended Complaint moots any objection. It 

provides the Respondent with adequate notice of the charges. The Amended Complaint is clear 

and detailed enough to frame a responsive pleading. Further clarification may be obtained 

through the process of discovery. 3 

1 While the Motion states that it is being filed under a different, non-applicable Rule, the Motion will be considered 

to have been constructively filed under the applicable Rule 218(t). 2 Complainant also moved for leave to file its answer late, citing the press of business. This motion is granted. 3 See Delaware Skyways, LLC, FAA Order No. 2005-6 (March 18, 2005), p. 9. That portion of Complainant's 

Motion which seeks Production of Documents is dismissed as premature. 
2 

In accordance with Rule 218( f)(3 )(i), Respondent shall file an Answer to the Complaint 

not later than 1 0 days after service of this Order. 

Attachment - Service List 

£Wr_~ta Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 
3 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Kate Barber, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Great Lakes Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue, AGL-7 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

TEL: 847-294-7862 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

ONE COPY 

Martin A. Blumenthal, Respondent's Counsel 

Attorney 

One Northfield Plaza, Suite 300 

Northfield, IL 60093 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-3 66-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0620 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC---430.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**INTERLINEBRANDS, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Interline Brands, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 26, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John A. Ebner, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| /S/  JOHN A. EBNER                     |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| John A. Ebner                          |   |
| Chief Financial Officer  and Treasurer |   |
| May 3,  2010                      |   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 356 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 356

 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2002

 Mr. Hoyer (for himself, Mrs. Morella, Ms. Norton, Mr. Wynn, Mr. Moran 
     of Virginia, and Mr. Wolf) submitted the following concurrent 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater Washington 
                            Soap Box Derby.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association (in this 
resolution referred to as the ``Association'') shall be permitted to 
sponsor a public event, soap box derby races, on the Capitol Grounds on 
June 22, 2002, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the 
Senate may jointly designate.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

    The event to be carried out under this resolution shall be free of 
admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere with the 
needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board; except that the 
Association shall assume full responsibility for all expenses and 
liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

    For the purposes of this resolution, the Association is authorized 
to erect upon the Capitol Grounds, subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices, and 
other related structures and equipment as may be required for the event 
to be carried out under this resolution.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make any such additional arrangements that may be 
required to carry out the event under this resolution.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946 (40 
U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, advertisements, displays, 
and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions 
applicable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event to be 
carried out under this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

GMH COMMUNITIES TRUST

 

CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY

RULE 13a-14(a) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

I, Gary M. Holloway, Sr., President andChief Executive Officer of GMH Communities Trust, a Maryland real estateinvestment trust (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Company’speriodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the “Form 10-Q”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

*             *             *

 

 
| /s/ Gary M. Holloway, Sr.        |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Gary M. Holloway, Sr.            |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                  |
|                                  |
| Date:  August 12, 2005      |

 

----
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 6, 2010

d0429 

# Order

May 6, 2010

140245

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140245 COA: 286269 Oakland CC: 2008-218685-FH DANIEL DERRELE MABIN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 29, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Page 1 of 1 Meeting Summary EPA/ Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. May 4, 2011

, 1 0 :0 0 A M to 11:00 A M Room S

- 8 6 21 , 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. : Te ri Muchow, John Butala Participants

EPA: Nader Elkassaban y, Tim Leighton, Mark Hartman, Jonathan Chen, Lance Wormell, Rebecca von dem Hagen

On Wednesday, May 4, 2011 AD hosted a meeting with Osmose Utilities Services, Inc

. to discuss the sodium fluoride data call

- in issued as a result of the 2007 reregistration eligibility decision (RED)

. Osmose requested the meeting to explore options for fulfilling the data requirements being called i n through the Generic Data Call

- In (GDCI) issued in Febru ary 2010. During the meeting, the registrant presented an overview of the manufacturing and application process es of two end use products. Summary

EPA will continue to work with Osmose to address concerns with the GDCI. Osmose will submit a follow

- up letter to the Agency. Next Steps