alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 25

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding tuberous sclerosis.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 8, 2001

Mrs. KELLY submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding tuberous

sclerosis.

Whereas at least two children born each day will be affected

with tuberous sclerosis;

Whereas nearly one million people worldwide are known to

have tuberous sclerosis;

Whereas tuberous sclerosis affects all races and ethnic groups

equally;

Whereas tuberous sclerosis is caused by either an inherited

autosomal disorder or by a spontaneous genetic mutation;

Whereas when tuberous sclerosis is genetically transmitted as

an autosomal dominant disorder, a child with a parent

with the gene will have a 50-percent chance of inheriting

the disease;
2

•HCON 25 IH

Whereas two-thirds of the cases of tuberous sclerosis are believed to be a result of spontaneous mutation, although

the cause of such mutations is a mystery;

Whereas diagnosis takes an average of 90 days with consultation of at least three specialists;

Whereas tuberous sclerosis is the largest known genetic cause

of epilepsy;

Whereas tuberous sclerosis is now the second largest identifiable genetic cause of autism;

Whereas tuberous sclerosis frequently goes undiagnosed because of the obscurity of the disease and the mild form

the symptoms may take; and

Whereas the Congress as an institution, and Members of

Congress as individuals, are in unique positions to help

raise public awareness about the need for increased funding for research, detection, and treatment of tuberous

sclerosis and to support the fight against tuberous sclerosis: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) all Americans should take an active role in

4 the fight against tuberous sclerosis by all means

5 available to them, including early and complete clin6 ical testing and investigating family histories;

7 (2) the role played by national and community

8 organizations and health care providers in promoting

9 awareness of the importance of early diagnosis, test-
3

•HCON 25 IH

1 ing, and ongoing screening should be recognized and

2 applauded;

3 (3) the Federal Government has a responsibility

4 to—

5 (A) endeavor to raise awareness about the

6 importance of the early detection of, and proper

7 treatment for, tuberous sclerosis;

8 (B) increase funding for research so that

9 the causes of, and improved treatment for, tu10 berous sclerosis may be discovered; and

11 (C) continue to consider ways to improve

12 access to, and the quality of, health care serv13 ices for detecting and treating tuberous scle14 rosis; and

15 (4) the Director of the National Institutes of

16 Health should take a leadership role in the fight

17 against tuberous sclerosis by acting with appropriate

18 offices within the National Institutes of Health to

19 provide to the Congress a five-year research plan for

20 tuberous sclerosis.

Æ
#### Jeffrey DERIS v. Christy ROCHELLE, et al.

No. 87-C-1094.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Deris, Jeffrey; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, mandamus, prohibition; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 86-CA-0753; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 218943.

Denied.
#### Kilgore, Appellant, *v.*The U-Drive-It Co., Appellee.

(No. 31248

Decided May 19, 1948.)

*Messrs. Cowan & Adams*and *Mr. Russ. Bothwell,*for appellant.

*Mr. Collis Gundy Lane,*for appellee.

*506By the Court.

In our opinion the facts of this case make applicable herein the provisions of Section 6308-6, General Code, known generally as the “guest statute,” which relieves the owner, operator or a person responsible for the operation of a motor vehicle from all liability for the injury or death of a gratuitous guest being transported in such motor vehicle resulting from the operation thereof, unless such injury or death is caused by wilful or wanton misconduct in the operation of the vehicle. This court held in the cases of *Kitchens*v. *Duffield, ante,*500, that the “guest statute” in its existing form applies when the particular motor vehicle involved is being operated on either a private or public way or avenue of travel.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals herein is therefore affirmed, on authority of the cases above cited.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.

Turner, J., not participating.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our reports  included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's  previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-4 (File No. 333-60727),  and on Form S-8 (File
No. 33-42354,  No.  33-63510,  No. 33-79654,  No,  33-79756,  No. 33-79664,  No.
333-48357, No. 333-62473, No. 333-68815, No. 333-81821 and No. 333-94405).




         ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
March 27, 2000
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff 

SOUTHTECH, INC. 

AND 

YASUDA FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE 

 COMPANY OF AMERICA 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 2602-95-2 PER CURIAM 

 MARCH 19, 1996 

ALLISON DAVIS 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' 

COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (William C. Walker; Bradford C. Jacob; Taylor & 

Walker, on brief), for appellants. 

 (B. Mayes Marks, Jr., on brief), for appellee. 

 Southtech, Inc. and its insurer contend that the Workers' 

Compensation Commission erred in finding that Allison Davis' 

bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome qualifies as a compensable 

occupational disease within the meaning of "disease" under the 

Workers' Compensation Act ("the Act"). 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 

 This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in 

Stenrich Group v. Jemmott, ___ Va. ___, ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, ___ 

(1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from 

cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or 

however defined, are, as a matter of law, not compensable under 

the present provisions of the Act"). 

 Accordingly, we reverse the commission's decision. 
 2 

 Reversed.
#### L & M DEMOLITION, INC., and Levi Slaughter Asphalt Company, Inc., a Joint Venture v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS and Paul C. Mitchell, Jr., Director of the Department of Finance for the City of New Orleans.

No. 89-C-0098.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1989.

In re L & M Demolition Inc.; Levi Slaughter Asphalt Co.; Slaughter, Levi Asphalt Co.;—Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 88CA-0384; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “C”, No. 87-14461.

Denied.

MARCUS and DENNIS, JJ., would grant the writ.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 348 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 348

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 1, 2002

   Received and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Book 
                               Festival.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL BOOK 
              FESTIVAL.

    (a) In General.--The Library of Congress (in this resolution 
referred to as the ``sponsor''), in cooperation with the First Lady, 
may sponsor the National Book Festival (in this resolution referred to 
as the ``event'') on the Capitol Grounds.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on September 21, 2002, 
or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives 
and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly 
designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    (a) Structures and Equipment.--Subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, the sponsor may cause to be placed on the 
Capitol Grounds such stage, seating, booths, sound amplification and 
video devices, and other related structures and equipment as may be 
required for the event, including equipment for the broadcast of the 
event over radio, television, and other media outlets.
    (b) Additional Arrangements.--The Architect of the Capitol and the 
Capitol Police Board may make any additional arrangements as may be 
required to carry out the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946 (40 
U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, displays, advertisements, 
and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions 
applicable to the Capitol Grounds in connection with the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 30, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 225 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 225

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2001

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress that, as a symbol of solidarity 
 following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 
2001, every United States citizen is encouraged to display the flag of 
                           the United States.

Whereas on September 11, 2001, terrorists hijacked and destroyed four commercial 
        aircraft, crashing two of them into the World Trade Center in New York 
        City, and crashing another aircraft into the Pentagon outside 
        Washington, D.C.; and
Whereas thousands of innocent people were killed and injured as a result of 
        those attacks, including the passengers and
crew of the four aircraft, workers and visitors in the World Trade Center and 
the Pentagon, rescue workers, and bystanders: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) in response to the terrorist attacks on the United 
        States on September 11, 2001, United States citizens should 
        join together to defend and honor the Nation and its symbols of 
        strength; and
            (2) for a period of 30 days after the date on which this 
        resolution is agreed to, each United States citizen and every 
        community in the Nation is encouraged to display the flag of 
        the United States at homes, places of work and business, public 
        buildings, and places of worship to remember those individuals 
        who have been lost and to show the solidarity, resolve, and 
        strength of the Nation.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Docket Number: FAA-2012-0724

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Transport Canada Anthony Wan

613-952-4357

7/27/10 No Objection

Bombardier Cristina Yung

416-375-4038

7/26/10 No Objection

Regional Airline 

Association

Dave Lotterer

202-367-1252

7/28/10 Left Message
My name is Samantha Spaccasi. I am a sophomore at Oberlin College, majoring in 

Environmental Studies with a concentration in Environmental Justice, and my hometown is 

Darnestown, MD. I am also the Clean Water intern at the Sierra Club Maryland Chapter. At 

school, I campaign against the dangerous process of tracking. If it isn't already obvious, 

protecting the environment is my passion. I would like to thank EPA for this opportunity to 

testify. 

My family roots lie in Hawaii. My great-grandmother, a Korean picture bride, was shipped off 

to marry my great-grandfather and start a home on the plantation. Growing up, I heard 

fantastic stories about this beautiful land, with its lush forests, crystal-clear waters, and 

diverse wildlife. I have had the fortune to visit this land many times, and each time I return 

there, I am amazed by how much these people care about and work with the land they live 

in. Walking off the airplane, the air immediately smells of flowers, and feels refreshing and 

healthy. Breathing in Hawaii is unlike breathing anywhere else. 

When I come back to Maryland, I immediately feel suffocated. No, it's not because of the 

natural humid climate, it is because "Maryland suffers from the worst air quality on the 

Atlantic Coast" (MD Beyond Coal Campaign). Only 5 out of the 13 coal plants have modern 

pollution-cutting technology for both sulfur dioxide and smog-causing nitrogen oxides. 

What's most disappointing, however, is that none of those five are using their technology to 

the maximum extent possible to reduce pollution! I live a mere 10 miles away from one of 

my state's dirtiest coal plant, the Dickerson Power Plant, and for 19 years I have been 

breathing the toxic air from this power plant. My entire family lives in Maryland. They too 

have been breathing this dangerous air for most or all of their lives. But thanks to the good 

work done by the EPA, maybe something will finally be done to increase the air quality in 

my home state. 

EPA, I laud you for taking action on climate change and protecting Americans health while 

still making it possible to maintain an affordable energy system. Thank you for seeing that 

cutting carbon emissions will not hurt our economy. These actions are so significant 

towards taking a step forward in the complic,ated battle of climate change. Reducing 

emissions is important, but also is taking the time to promote and increase subsidies for 

renewable energy. Renewables are clean, healthy, and can be adapted to our 

infrastructure. The installation of these healthy energy sources are also sources of muchneeded jobs. They can also make the US energy independent in a clean, practical way. 

I beg you not to bend to the whims of the greedy coal industries, intent on increasing profit 

at the expense of the health of thousands of Americans. These rules proposed are beyond 

reasonable and practical. Thank you so much for taking initiative to protect my generation's 

and future generation's ability to breathe easy, and thank you again for allowing me this 

opportunity to testify before you.
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of **Design Source, Inc.** (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended **September
      30, 2007** as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"),
      I, Peter Reichard, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated
      this 8th day of November, 2007.


/s/ Peter ReichardPeter
                    Reichard
                  Chief
                    Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                    Officer
#### Joyce OLIVER, et al. v. Samuel SAIA, et al.

No. 87-C-2158.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 13, 1987.

In re Oliver, Joyce; Oliver, Grady; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA86 0346; Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 31692.

Prior report: La.App., 510 So.2d 770.

Denied.

LEMMON, J., would grant the writ.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 161 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 161

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Honoring the 19 United States servicemen who died in the terrorist 
  bombing of the Khobar Towers military housing compound in Dhahran, 
                    Saudi Arabia, on June 25, 1996.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 161

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas June 25, 2001, marks the fifth anniversary of the tragic terrorist 
        bombing of the Khobar Towers military housing compound in Dhahran, Saudi 
        Arabia;
Whereas 19 members of the United States Air Force were killed in the bombing and 
        250 other United States military personnel were wounded;
Whereas the 19 airmen killed while serving their country were Captain 
        Christopher Adams, Sergeant Daniel Cafourek, Sergeant Millard Campbell, 
        Senior Airman Earl Cartrette, Jr., Sergeant Patrick Fennig, Captain 
        Leland Haun, Sergeant Michael Heiser, Sergeant Kevin Johnson, Sergeant 
        Ronald King, Sergeant Kendall Kitson, Jr., Airman First Class 
        Christopher Lester, Airman First Class Brent Marthaler, Airman First 
        Class Brian McVeigh, Airman First Class Peter Morgera, Sergeant Thanh 
        Nguyen, Airman First Class Joseph Rimkus, Senior Airman Jeremy Taylor, 
        Airman First Class Justin Wood, and Airman First Class Joshua Woody;
Whereas the families of these brave airmen still mourn their loss;
Whereas on September 24, 1996, the House of Representatives agreed to House 
        Concurrent Resolution 200 of the 104th Congress honoring the victims of 
        that terrorist bombing;
Whereas those guilty of the attack have yet to be brought to justice; and
Whereas terrorism remains a constant and ever-present threat around the world: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, on the occasion of the fifth anniversary of the terrorist bombing 
of the Khobar Towers military housing compound in Dhahran, Saudi 
Arabia, the Congress--
            (1) recognizes the sacrifice of the 19 members of the 
        United States Air Force who died in that attack; and
            (2) calls upon every American to pause and pay tribute to 
        those brave airmen.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 25, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Britt Eric JONES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-80-579.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Aug. 31, 1982.

Virginia Henson, Henson, Laster & Henson, Shawnee, for appellant.

Jan Eric Cartwright, Atty. Gen., Jimmy D. Givens, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRETT, Presiding Judge:

The appellant was certified to stand trial as an adult charged with Murder in the First Degree, Case No. CRF-79-39, in the District Court of Pottawatomie County. The jury returned a verdict of Manslaughter in the First Degree, and punishment was set at imprisonment for ten (10) years.

On the night of January 3, 1979, the deceased, Richard Witty, his wife, and his stepdaughter, Kelle, were asleep at their home when, at about 2:00 a.m., two shots were fired in the house. One shot struck and killed the deceased. The appellant and his friend James Daughterty were subsequently arrested and charged with First Degree Murder. The State produced testimony about conversations between Jones, Daugherty, Kelle and their mutual friends which tended to prove that Jones was the assailant, although the deceased and his wife had not been acquainted with Jones prior to the shooting.

The sole assignment on appeal is that the trial court improperly instructed on Man*893slaughter in the First Degree under a set of facts that are unsupportive of that crime. However, this Court’s review of the facts and the law indicate that the trial court was exercising extreme caution and that such an instruction was appropriate. This Court’s long-standing rule is as follows.

> It is the duty of the court to determine as a matter of law whether the evidence is such as to justify the submission of both or either of these issues to the jury. This duty may sometimes be extremely difficult, and if there is any doubt about the matter in the mind of the court, the lower degree of the homicide should be submitted for the consideration of the jury. *Clapp v. State,*73 Okl.Cr. 261, 120 P.2d 381 (1941).

See also *Abel*v. *State,*507 P.2d 569 (Okl. Cr. 1973).

Therefore, the judgment and sentence is affirmed.

BUSSEY and CORNISH, JJ., concur.