alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7821

DAN OLIVER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

K. FOWLKES, Ombudsman; JOHN TAYLOR, Warden;

JOE TEEFEY, Institutional Attorney; H. CLARK,

Operational Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District

Judge. (CA-99-1485-AM)

Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 6, 2001

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dan Oliver, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Mark Charles Nanavati, SINNOTT,

NUCKOLS & LOGAN, P.C., Midlothian, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Dan Oliver appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. Oliver v. Fowlkes, No. CA-99-1485-AM

(E.D. Va. filed Nov. 28, 2000; entered Nov. 29, 2000). With regard

to claims Oliver asserts the district court did not address, we

find that those claims lack merit. We deny Oliver’s motions for a

certificate of appealability, for appointment of counsel, for

extraordinary relief, and for emergency relief. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6234

CHAVIS ODELL PULLEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

AARON S. JOYNER, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:18-cv-03426-HMH)

Submitted: May 23, 2019 Decided: May 29, 2019

Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chavis Odell Pullen, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Chavis Odell Pullen appeals the district court’s order dismissing Pullen’s 28 

U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order 

and failure to prosecute, and the district court’s order denying Pullen’s postjudgment 

motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court.

∗

 Pullen v. Joyner, No. 6:18-cv-03426-HMH (D.S.C. Jan. 17 & Feb. 11, 2019). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

 ∗ Although a certificate of appealability generally is required to appeal “the final 

order in a habeas corpus proceeding,” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012), we conclude 

that none is required here because the district court’s dismissal for failure to comply with 

a court order and failure to prosecute is unrelated to the merits of the § 2254 petition. See

Harbison v. Bell, 556 U.S. 180, 182-83 (2009).
EX-10.2






Exhibit 10.2




Schedule of Certain Executive Officers who are Parties to

Change in Control Severance Agreements,

which agreements are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(i) to the

Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A

for the quarterly period ending June 28, 2003




Form B of the Change in Control Severance Agreement



Justin C. Boswell


Jeff Hung-Tse Chen
|   | · | Start date: May 18, 2011 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|

|   | · | Location: Miami, FL |
|--------|--------|---------------------|

|   | · | Reporting: You will report to the President and Chief Operating Officer, Richard Lappenbusch. |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Direct Reports: Sales, Marketing, Public Relations Staff, Contractors and Vendors. |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Salary: $200,000USD annually to be paid semi-monthly. |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Bonus: Up to 50% of your annual base salary; reviewed and set annually during the 11th month of the fiscal year, based on the sales team scorecard to be mutually agreed by June 1, 2011 and 1st month of the fiscal year hereafter. |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Equity: 1.5M shares, subject to 3 year vesting schedule, pursuant to the Company’s filing of a new Stock Option Plan. |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Benefits Package: medical, dental, vision, life, wellness, disability insurance plans, and others as per made available to the Company’s employees per company policy. |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o | As discussed and agreed, the Company is in the process of enhancing its benefits program. The Company has agreed to reimburse you up to $1,800.00 monthly towards health and other benefits programs until the new plan becomes available. |
|--------|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | PTO: On vacation & sick time combined, 18 days annually, standard company holidays. |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | Travel: all business travel to be covered fully by the company per company guidelines and policies. |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**INTERLINE BRANDS, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Interline Brands, Inc.(the “Company”) for the period ended September 24, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Michael J. Grebe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /S/  MICHAEL J. GREBE                                         |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael  J. Grebe                                             |   |
| Chairman  of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President |   |
| November 1,  2010                                        |   |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Dale B. Smith,certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Mueller Group, Inc.;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         [Reserved]

(c)          Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(d)         Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 2,2006
|        |   | /s/ DALE B. SMITH                                   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name: Dale B. Smith  Title: Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
[No. 19097-4-II.

Division Two.

August 23, 1996.]

#### Thomas M. Ord, *as Trustee, Respondent,*v. Millennium Property, Inc., et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 93-2-05809-3, Thomas R. Sauriol, J., entered July 29, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Turner, JJ.
EX-10.5





 Exhibit 10.5 

English Summary of Employee Share Incentive Plan No.2 of Burning Rock Biotech Limited 

 

	1.	 Definition. Wherever the following terms are used in the Plan they shall have the meanings specified
below, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. 


  

	 	a.	 “Company” means Burning Rock Biotech Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of the
Cayman Islands. 


  

	 	b.	 “Participant” means a person who, as an employee or officer of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries, has been granted Subscribed Shares pursuant to the Plan. 


  

	 	c.	 “Plan” means this Employee Share Incentive Plan No.2 of the Company adopted on June 25,
2020. 


  

	 	d.	 “Subscribed Share” means ordinary shares of the Company to be issued to a Participant of the
Plan. 


  

	2.	 Purpose. The purpose of the Plan is to provide incentives to the management team and employees of the
Company and its subsidiaries. 


  

	3.	 Number of Shares. The maximum number of ordinary shares reserved for issuance under this Plan is
140,000. 


  

	4.	 Eligibility. Persons eligible to participate in this Plan include the managers and above employees of
the Company and its subsidiaries. 


  

	5.	 Subscription Price. US$20.0229 per share. 



 

	6.	 Maximum Subscription Amount. Up to RMB2,000,000 worth of Subscribed Shares per Participant, depending on
each employee’s position and length of service with the Company. 


  

	7.	 Vesting Schedule. The Subscribed Shares will vest in three years and are subject to certain vesting
conditions. Subject to certain vesting conditions, 10%, 40% and 50% of the Subscribed Shares shall vest on the first, second and third anniversary of the date of grant, respectively. 



 

	8.	 Plan Administration. The chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Company have been
authorized to administer the plan. The plan administrators may determine the grant date, number of Subscribed Shares to be granted, Participants of the Plan, vesting conditions and other terms and conditions of the Subscribed Shares.
Exhibit 10.22


 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



     


    

 


 






    	 



    

\
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officers of PRA International (the Company) hereby certify, to such officers
knowledge, that: (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March
31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: May 6, 2005 /s/ Patrick K. Donnelly
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 66 (Thursday, April 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8127]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS12-05]


Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:
    Location: OCC--250 E Street SW., Room 8C, Washington, DC 20219.
    Date: April 11, 2012.
    Time: 10:30 a.m.
    Status: Open.

Matters To Be Considered

Summary Agenda

    March 14, 2012 minutes--Open Session
    (No substantive discussion of the above items is anticipated. These 
matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of the ASC 
requests that an item be moved to the discussion agenda.)

Discussion Agenda

    Appraisal Foundation December 2011 grant reimbursement request.
    Proposed revision of ASC Rules of Operation governing Vice 
Chairperson of the ASC.
    Kansas Compliance Review.

How To Attend and Observe an ASC Meeting

    Email your name, organization and contact information to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#620f0707160b0c0511220311014c050d14"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="701d151504191e1703301103135e171f06">[email protected]</span></a>. You may also send a written request via U.S. Mail, 
fax or commercial carrier to the Executive Director of the ASC, 1401 H 
Street NW., Ste. 760, Washington, DC 20005. The fax number is 202-289-
4101. Your request must be received no later than 4:30 p.m., ET, on the 
Monday prior to the meeting. Attendees must have a valid government-
issued photo ID and must agree to submit to reasonable security 
measures. The meeting space is intended to accommodate public 
attendees. However, if the space will not accommodate all requests, the 
ASC may refuse attendance on that reasonable basis. The use of any 
video or audio tape recording device, photographing device, or any 
other electronic or mechanical device designed for similar purposes is 
prohibited at ASC meetings.

    Dated: March 30, 2012.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-8127 Filed 4-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In re Mr. & Mrs. James Myles PONTIFF, Applying for Adoption v. Dawn BEHRENS.

No. 88-C-0008.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re Behrens, Dawn; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA86 1580; Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 1366.

Prior report: La.App., 518 So.2d 23.

Granted.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-30582

Summary Calendar

MARY NIXON BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

BURL CAIN, in his official capacity as Warden of Louisiana State

Penitentiary; STATE OF LOUISIANA, through the Department of Public

Safety and Corrections,

Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:10-CV-76

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the following reason:

The evidence establishes that Ms. Brown was terminated legally while

employed only in probational status. She contends that she had a reasonable

expectation that she would obtain permanent status, but that expectation was

only her unilateral expectation of the future while she had no legitimate belief

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 17, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-30582 Document: 00511668646 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/17/2011
No. 11-30582

or claim to actual permanent status. There was no deprivation of a right to due

process. See Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 92 S. Ct. 2701, 2709

(1972).

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 11-30582 Document: 00511668646 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/17/2011
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 423 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 423

  Recognizing the inherent worth of children in the United States and 
    expressing support for the goals and ideals of National KidsDay.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 21, 2002

  Mr. Toomey (for himself, Mr. Baldacci, Mr. Holden, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. 
Owens, Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. Otter, and Mr. Schiff) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the inherent worth of children in the United States and 
    expressing support for the goals and ideals of National KidsDay.

Whereas the children of the United States are the foundation on which our future 
        success is built;
Whereas national evidence suggests that children want and need more meaningful 
        time with the adults in their lives and seek parents and mentors to aid 
        them in developing confidence and growing into healthy adults;
Whereas families and communities play vital roles in helping children develop a 
        positive self-image, a sense of belonging, and a sense of competence;
Whereas parents and other adults recognize the challenges of spending meaningful 
        time with children amidst busy lifestyles;
Whereas the National KidsDay Alliance, comprising KidsPeace and Boys & Girls 
        Clubs of America and helping more than 20,000,000 children nationwide, 
        has come together to create a special day to honor children and 
        encourage adults to spend meaningful time with them this day and all 
        year long; and
Whereas National KidsDay is a day set aside each year--the first Sunday in 
        August--to encourage and remind adults that the meaningful time they 
        share with children is important to their development and the future of 
        the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) recognizes the importance of children to the future of 
        our country;
            (2) expresses support for the goals and ideas of National 
        KidsDay as established by the National KidsDay Alliance;
            (3) encourages the people of the United States to 
        participate in local and national activities honoring National 
        KidsDay; and
            (4) believes the adults who spend meaningful time with 
        children are making an investment in the future of our great 
        Nation.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 14586-7-III.

Division Three.

June 27, 1996.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Heather McCray, *Appellant,*and Edward R. Peer, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 94-3-01628-6, Robert Leeds, Pro Tern. Com., entered December 9, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, C.J., concurred in by Thompson and Schultheis, JJ.