alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

Rule 13a  14(a)/15(d) 
14(a)

I, Faisal Saleh, certify
that:

1.I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Cascade Energy Inc.;2.Based on my
knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this annual report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this annual report;

4. The registrants other certifying
officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the Evaluation Date); and c) presented in this annual report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. The registrants other
certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant
deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal controls; and 6. The registrants other
certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not
there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 23, 2006/s/ Faisal SalehFaisal
SalehChief Financial Officer

---
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff

SOUTHTECH, INC. AND YASUDA FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2602-95-2 PER CURIAM MARCH 19, 1996 ALLISON DAVIS

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (William C. Walker; Bradford C. Jacob; Taylor & Walker, on brief), for appellants. (B. Mayes Marks, Jr., on brief), for appellee.

Southtech, Inc. and its insurer contend that the Workers' Compensation Commission erred in finding that Allison Davis' bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome qualifies as a compensable occupational disease within the meaning of "disease" under the Workers' Compensation Act ("the Act").

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in Stenrich Group v. Jemmott , ___ Va. ___, ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, ___ (1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or however defined, are, as a matter of law, not compensable under the present provisions of the Act"). Accordingly, we reverse the commission's decision.2 Reversed.
**Exhibit32.1**

**INTERLINEBRANDS, INC.**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Interline Brands, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending September 29, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Grebe, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ MICHAEL J. GREBE                  |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael J. Grebe                      |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| November 8, 2006                      |   |

 

----
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Wilbert STOVALL, Jr.

No. CR 88-797.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

April 19, 1989.

William J. Bennett, Marksville, Dan McKay, Jr., Bunkie, for defendant-appellant.

J. Edward Knoll, Dist. Atty., Marksville, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GUIDRY, STOKER and KING, JJ.

GUIDRY, Judge.

Defendant, Wilbert Stovall, Jr., was charged by grand jury indictment with the crime of illegal possession of stolen goods, in violation of La.R.S. 14:69. On May 9, 1988, a jury of six unanimously found the defendant guilty. On June 14, 1988, he was sentenced to 18 months at hard labor. The defendant appealed his conviction.

*1010While this appeal was pending, defendant died. Thus, the prosecution against him is abated. *State v. Hamilton,*370 So.2d 874 (La.1979); *State v. Ferina,*351 So.2d 1200 (La.1977); *State v. Morris,*328 So.2d 65 (La.1976). As we stated in *State v. Beasley,*438 So.2d 1229 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1983):

> “Abatement ab initio of criminal proceedings has the effect of wiping the slate clean through indictment and conviction, and has as its purpose the consideration of the interest of the surviving family in preserving, unstained the memory of the deceased defendant or his reputation. *State v. McClow,*395 So.2d 757 (La.1981); *State v. Morris,*supra.”

DECREE

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed, the judgment of conviction is vacated, and the case is remanded to the trial court with instructions to dismiss the indictment against defendant.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MATTER REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The certification set forth below is being submittedin connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of MuellerGroup, Inc. (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode.

I, Dale B. Smith,the Chief Executive Officer of Mueller Group, Inc., certify that, to thebest of my knowledge:

1.                the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Mueller Group, Inc.
| Date: February 2, 2006 |   | By:    |   | /s/ DALE B. SMITH                      |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                        |   |   |   | Dale B. Smith  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### C.W. JACKSON v. Lawrence BREWER.

No. 57148.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 16, 1987.

Jay L. Jemigan, Hattiesburg, for appellant.

Gregory L. Gore, Hattiesburg, for appel-lee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Forrest County; William Robert Taylor, Jr., Chancellor.

Before WALKER, C.J., and PRATHER and GRIFFIN, JJ.

AFFIRMED ON DIRECT APPEAL. REVERSED AND RENDERED ON CROSS-APPEAL.

ROY NOBLE LEE and HAWKINS, P.JJ., and DAN M. LEE, ROBERTSON and ANDERSON, JJ., concurring.

SULLIVAN, J., not participating.
#### ARTECK SERVICES, INC. v. LANDIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.

No. 87-C-1030.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1987.

In re Arteck Services, Inc., applying for rehearing of a writ granted with order of June 19, 1987, 508 So.2d 81; to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeal, No. CA-5605; Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans, No. 84-20679, Div. L.

Rehearing denied.
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 160 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]






                                                       Calendar No. 226
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 160

                   To restore enforcement of rule 16.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 22, 1999

 Mr. Lott submitted the following resolution; which was ordered to be 
                         placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
                   To restore enforcement of rule 16.

    Resolved, That the presiding officer of the Senate should apply all 
precedents of the Senate under rule 16, in effect at the conclusion of 
the 103d Congress.




                                                       Calendar No. 226

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              S. RES. 160

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

                   To restore enforcement of rule 16.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 22, 1999

                  Ordered to be placed on the calendar`
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 277 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 277

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 5, 2001

   Received and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the important contributions of the Hispanic Chamber of 
                               Commerce.

Whereas the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce of the United States has had a 
        significant impact among Hispanic businesses, and in the business 
        community in general;
Whereas the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce has served in a key support role, not 
        merely as a business group but also as a civic organization working in 
        the Hispanic-American community; and
Whereas the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce has helped to bring entrepreneurship to 
        the Hispanic community as well as helping to pool the resources and 
        talents of Hispanic American entrepreneurs: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that it is important to the promotion 
of the free market process of the United States, to the future success 
of Hispanic Americans, and to society at large that the special role of 
the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce of the United States be recognized and 
further cultivated to the benefit of all Americans.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Amerisa Kornblum, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Odimo Incorporated;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 15, 2006 /s/ Amerisa Kornblum   Amerisa Kornblum   Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1767
KATHERINE A. HOOVER, M.D., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES; MARY ANN MCN EIL; AUBURN COOPER; WEST VIRGINIA BOARD OF MEDICINE; RONALD D. WALTON; A. PAUL BROOKS, M.D.; U. GRANT YOUNG, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Dennis Raymond Knapp, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-86-2) Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 13, 1997 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Katherine A. Hoover, Appellant Pro Se. Charles R. Bailey, Belinda B. Jackson, SHUMAN, ANNAND & POE, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' motion to dismiss. We have revi ewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hoover v. West Virginia Dep't HHR , No. CA-97-86-2 (S.D.W Va. May 9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-11-0653

SAT Date: 10/4/2011

Print Date: 8/7/2012

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 1 Health: PMN ; Eco: intact material

2 3 Health: Degradation/Incineration Product ; Eco: high concern for toxicity 

incomplete incineration products to terrestrial organisms

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

3 1 1 PMN

3 2 2 Inc Pdt

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Inhalation 

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-11-0653

FATE: 

Solid 

S = Negl.

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 50-90 via sorption
Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P3B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is nil all routes based on physical/chemical 

properties. There is concern for lung effects if respirable particles are inhaled based on lung 

overload from high molecular weight polymers and waterproofing of the lungs. 

Low moderate concern. 

For the potential incomplete incineration product/ environmental degradation product, based on 

test data for the analogue concerns are liver toxicity, blood toxicity, and 

male reproductive toxicity [rat 28-day oral NOAEL = 50 mg/kg, LOAEL = 150 mg/kg with liver 

toxicity; rat 90-day oral LOAEL = 10 mg/kg based on decreased body weight in males at all 

doses and liver toxicity and anemia at 200 mg/kg; there were toxic effects on the testes in 2 

males in the 90-day oral study that were judged by the reviewer to be indicative of the potential 

for male reproductive toxicity. There is also concern for immunosuppression and oncogenicity 

based on data for Moderate concern.

 Test Data: negative in Salmonella and E coli

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic polymers; SAR 

chemical class = 

 solid with mp unknown (P); S < 0.001 mg/L at 20 C(P); pH7; effective concentrations 

based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as 

CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

high concern for toxicity from the 
Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

*

SARs nonionic polymers

SAR Class

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
H. Con. Res. 299 Agreed to January 23, 2002

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the two Houses of Congress assemble in the Hall of

the House of Representatives on Tuesday, January 29, 2002, at

9 p.m., for the purpose of receiving such communication as the

President of the United States shall be pleased to make to them.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lola K. MOWERS.

No. 88-KK-0347.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 26, 1988.

In re Mowers, Lola K.; applying for writ of habeas corpus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 54336; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW88 0200.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 322 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 322

 Commending President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan for his leadership 
         and friendship and welcoming him to the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2002

  Mr. Pitts submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Commending President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan for his leadership 
         and friendship and welcoming him to the United States.

Whereas President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan has shown credible and courageous 
        leadership in cooperating with the United States in the fight against 
        terrorism;
Whereas the war against terrorism underscores the importance of strengthening 
        the historic bilateral relationship between the United States and 
        Pakistan;
Whereas President Musharraf has pursued the return of Pakistan to democracy and 
        civil society and has adhered to the timetable for restoring democratic 
        elections to Pakistan;
Whereas President Musharraf has shown great fortitude in confronting extremists 
        and outlawing terrorism in Pakistan;
Whereas President Musharraf has established a joint electorate system so that 
        minorities are no longer disenfranchised and underrepresented in a 
        separate electorate system; and
Whereas the Pakistani-American community in the United States plays an important 
        role in developing a closer relationship between the peoples of the 
        United States and Pakistan: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress commends President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan for his 
leadership and friendship and welcomes him to the United States.
                                 <all>
```