alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-17-00280-CR

ANDREW MICHAEL WILSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 271st District 

Court

of Jack County (4720)

November 29, 2018

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Bonnie Sudderth_________________

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
### George P. Murray, Plaintiff, 

### v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Civil Action No. United States Court ofAppeals for Veterans Claims, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 

### Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED NOV - 62009 Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts 

# 09 

# 2091

This matter is before the court on the plaintiffspro se complaint and application to proceed in formapauperis. The application to proceed informapauperis will be granted and the complaint will be dismissed. Taken at face value, the complaint sues the United States Court ofAppeals for Veterans Claims for $12.5 million for its decision. A court is immune from a damages suit for actions taken in the performance ofits duties, asjudges enjoy absolutejudicial immunity when acting in theirjudicial capacities and within theirjurisdiction. Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11 (1991). Accordingly, the complaint will be dismissed because it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.! A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.

! Although a court is immune from a damages suit, its decisions may be subject to appeal. Itis not clear from the face ofthe complaint that the plaintiffintended to initiate an appeal. Whatever the plaintiffs intent, this court does not havejurisdiction over an appeal from United States Court ofAppeals for Veterans Claims. "The exclusive avenue for redress of veterans' benefits determinations is appeal to the Court ofVeterans [Claims land from there to the United States Court ofAppeals for the Federal Circuit." Price 

### v. UnitedStates, 228 F3d 420, 421 (D.C. Cir. 2000).
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kalobios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David C. Pritchard, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                         
|------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|September 24, 2012 |  |  |  | /s/ David C. Pritchard                                  
|                   |  |  |  | David C. Pritchard President
and Chief Executive Officer
|                   |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                           

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), has been provided to KaloBios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by KaloBios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of KaloBios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 206 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 206

 Recognizing the important relationship between the United States and 
                                Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 2001

 Mr. Paul (for himself, Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Kolbe, Mr. Barton of Texas, 
  Mr. Nethercutt, and Mr. Dreier) submitted the following concurrent 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the important relationship between the United States and 
                                Mexico.

Whereas the United States and Mexico share a special bilateral friendship 
        matched by few other countries in the world;
Whereas the United States and Mexico are partners joined by geography as well as 
        by a series of government-to-government and private relationships which 
        are of critical importance to both countries;
Whereas the United States and Mexico share concern on a wide range of issues, 
        including trade and immigration, environmental quality, economic 
        development, and regional security and stability; and
Whereas the special relationship between the United States and Mexico is 
        critically important in its own right as well as serving as a linchpin 
        in the relationship between the United States and every nation in 
        Central and South America: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that it is in keeping with the just 
interests of the United States that the special nature of the 
relationship between the United States and Mexico be recognized and 
further cultivated to the mutual benefit of both countries.
                                 <all>
```
UNCLASSIFIEDIIFOR PUBLIC RELEASE 


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBI~oU/ILEO WITH TN 

cSQ' Ts E 

) O'\'{';'" / ~: f 

SHARQAWI ADDU ALI AL-HAJJ ) 

(ISN 1457), ) 

) 

Petitioner, ) 

) Civil No. 09-745 (RCL) 

v. ) 

) 

BARACK OBAMA, et aL, ) 

) 

Respondents. ) 

) 

,ORDER 

Upon consideration of petitioner's Motion [1472J to Strike Statements in the 

Factual Return, respondents' opposition, the reply thereto, and the applicable law, it is for 

the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion hereby 

ORDERED that petitioner's motion is DENIED IN PART with respect to any 

statements petitioner made while in custody in Pakistan; and it is furthennore 

ORDERED that petitioner's motion is GRANTED IN PART with respect to any 

statements petitioner made while in custody at Bagram Air Force Base; and it is 

furthennore 

ORDERED that petitioner's motion is GRANTED IN PART with respect to any 

statements petitioner made while in custody at Guantanamo Bay; and it is furthennore 

ORDERED that respondents shall file an amended factual return within 30 days 

of this Order; and it is furthennore 

8BfJMrt'HN8P8ftff 

UNCLASSIFIEOIIFOR PUBLIC RELEASE 
UNCLASSIFIEDIIFOR PUBLIC RELEASE 


ORDERED that respondents shall file an unclassified factual return within 14 

days of the date on which respondents are to file an amended factual return; and it is 

furthermore 

ORDERED that respondents shall file notice under Section Ln.1 of Judge 

Hogan's Case Management Order (Misc. No. 08-442) within 14 days of the date on 

which respondents are to file an amended factual return; and it is furthermore 

ORDERED that petitioner shall file a traverse within 14 days of the date on which 

respondents file notice under Section I.D.I. 

SO ORDERED. 

DATE 	

~c,~ RO CE C. LAMBERTH 

CHIEF JUDGE 

UNCLASSIFIEDIIFOR PUBLIC RELEASE 

2
[No. 34591-5-I.

Division One.

June 24, 1996.]

#### Dennis Martin, et al., *Respondents,*v. John McEvoy, et al., *Defendants,*Joan Miller, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 91-2-17082-7, Michael S. Spearman, J., entered April 14, 1996. *Dismissed*by unpublished opinion per Becker, J., concurred in by Webster and Coleman, JJ.
Exhibit 10.27a.
                                                           No. 1

                    ADDENDUM TO INVESTMENT BANKING AGREEMENT


This Addendum to the June 17th Investment Banking Agreement by and between Delta
Mutual, Inc. and T & T Vermogensverwaltungs AG, is effective this 3rd day of
August, 2005 and modifies as follows:

Paragraph

      (1)   The First Tranche shall take the form of a private placement of
            $1,500,000, to be completed by August 31, 2005. All other conditions
            as per item No. 1 remain as per the June 17, 2005 Agreement.

               "COMPENSATION" paragraph is replaced in its entirely as follows:
              Delta agrees to compensate T&T as described in this paragraph but
              only if investors who are introduced by T&T actually provide
              funding to Delta. In such event, Delta agrees to pay or cause to
              be paid a cash fee equal to up to twenty percent (20%) of the cash
              proceeds received by Delta on the next $820,000, plus one million,
              four hundred and thirty thousand shares (1,430,000) of restricted
              common stock. The foregoing sentence not withstanding, T&T, at its
              sole option, may deduct any cash compensation due to it under this
              section of the Agreement from the gross proceeds due to Delta from
              the placement of private equity in accordance with this Agreement.
              Subsequent to receipt of the next $820,000, the cash fee will
              reduce to 12% on all future funding and no restricted common
              shares.

              The foregoing paragraph notwithstanding, Delta is under no
              obligation to accept any offer for investment brought to Delta by
              T&T and T&T acknowledges that it cannot control any decisions made
              by Delta, including the decision by Delta (at its sole discretion)
              to refuse any investors or investment proposals provided by T&T
              under this Agreement.



T&T Vermogensverwaltungs, AG (T&T)           Delta Mutual, Inc.

       /s/ Ivano Angelastri                         /s/ Peter Russo
By: ________________________                 By: _________________________
        Ivano Angelastri                             Peter F. Russo
        President                                    President & CEO
#### Jan R. CARTER, et al. v. Emily DEITZ, et al.

No. 87-CC-1401.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 15, 1987.

In re Hanemann, James; applying for supervisory and remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. C-7342; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “D”, No. 78-11981.

Denied.
# U n i t e d S t a t e s C o u r t o f A pp e a l s For the Eig hth Circu it

_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ No . 1 8 -3 6 84

_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Un i t ed St at es o f Am eri ca
l ll l l l l l l l l l l l ll l l l l l Pl a i n t i

f f - Ap pel l ee

v
. W es l ey W arren No rri s
l ll l l l l l l l l l l l ll l l l l l Def

en da n t - Ap pel l an t

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Ap p eal fro m

Un i t ed St at es Di s t ri ct Co u rt fo r t h e W es t ern Di s t ri ct o f M i s s o u ri - Sp ri n g fi el d

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Su b m i t ted : Au g u s t 5 , 2 01 9 Fi l ed : Au g u s t 8 , 2 0 1 9 [Un pu b l is h ed ]

_ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ Befo re SHEPHERD, GRASZ, an d KOBES, Ci rcu i t J u d g es

.

_ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ PER CURIAM

.

W es l ey No rri s d i rect l y ap p eal s af t e r h e p l ed g u i l t y t o di st ri bu t i n g ch i ld p o rn og rap hy an d t h e d i st ri ct co u rt 1 s e n t en ced h i m to a p ri s o n t erm wi t h i n t h e

1 Th e Ho n o rab l e Ro s ean n A. Ket ch m ark , Un it ed St at es Di s t ri ct J u d g e fo r t h e W es t ern Di s t ri ct o f M is s o u ri

.cal cu l at ed Un i t ed St at es Sen t en ci n g Gu id el in es Man ual ran g e. H i s co u n s el h as

m o ved fo r l eav e t o wi t h d raw, an d h as fi l ed a bri ef u n der An d er s v. Ca l i f o rn i a , 3 8 6 U.S. 7 3 8 (1 9 67 ), rai s in g as an i ss u e wh et h er t he d i s t ri ct co u rt i m p o s ed a s u b s tan t i v el y
u n reas o nab l e p ri s o n t erm

. Up o n carefu l rev i ew, we co n cl u d e t h at t h e d is tri c t c o u rt d id n o t i m p o s e a
s u b s t an t i vel y u n reas o n ab l e pri so n t erm

. S ee Un i t ed St at es v. Feems ter , 5 7 2 F.3 d 4 5 5, 4 6 1 -6 2 (8 t h Ci r. 20 0 9 ) (en b an c) (rev i ewi n g s en ten ce u n d e r d e f e ren t i al ab u se-o f-d isc r e tion sta

n da r d a nd disc uss i n g su b st an t i v e reas o n ab l en es s ). In ad d i t i o n, h av in g i n d ep en d en tl y rev iewed t h e reco rd u n der Pen so n v. Oh io , 4 8 8 U.S. 7 5 (1 9 8 8 ),

we fi n d n o n o n fri vo l o u s i s s u es fo r ap p eal

. Acco rd in g l y , we gran t co u n s el ’ s m o t i o n t o wi t h d raw, an d we affi rm

.

__ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _

-2

-
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Abington Community Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Robert W. White, Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:


      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.





                                                         /s/ Robert W. White
                                                         ----------------------
                                                         Robert W. White
                                                         Chairman, President and
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                         May 12, 2006


      A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ABINGTON COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC. AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY ABINGTON COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

I, Thomas Kaetzer, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Baseline
Oil & Gas Corp., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31,
2007 (the "Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and

(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 14, 2007
                                               /s/ Thomas Kaetzer
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Thomas Kaetzer
                                               Chairman, Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
State of California California Environmental Protection Agency

AIR RESOURCES BOARD

Supplement to the Final Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking



### Large Spark-Ignition Engines with an Engine Displac ement

Less Than or Equal to One Liter

Public Hearing Date: November 21, 2008 Agenda Item No.: 08-10-4

The ARB is submitting this supplement to the Final Statement of Reasons for insertion in Office of Administrative Law (OAL) File Number 2 009-0908-04S.

Nonsubstantial Changes Made to the Final Regulation Order

ARB has made some minor nonsubstantial changes to t he final regulation order for punctuation, grammar, accuracy, clarity, and proper authority and reference citations. The changes made do not materially alter any requir ement, right responsibility, condition, prescription, or other regulatory elemen t of any California Code of Regulations (CCR) provisions. They are as follows:

Section 2433(b)(5): Corrected the wording from “de finitions” to “definition.”

Section 2433 (c): Corrected the date of amendment for the “California Exhaust and Evaporative Emission Standards and Test Procedures for New 2010 and Later OffRoad Large Spark-ignition Engines (2010 and Later T est Procedure 1048)” added after

March 2, 2007 “, as last amended November 21, 2008. ”

Section 2433 (d) (2): The titles given in the regul ation for the incorporated test procedures TP-901, TP-902, and CP-901 have been cor rected so that the referenced titles correspond with the titles on the test proce dures themselves.

California Exhaust and Evaporative Emission Standar ds and Test Procedures for New 2010 And Later Off-Road Large Spark-Ignition Engine s: Added a series of five asterisks to indicate that there are no further changes to th e document.

Summary and Response

10. Comment: ROHVA supports functional harmonization between U. S. EPA and ARB vehicle classification systems. ROHVA is conce rned by the fact that some

OHRVs covered under U.S. EPA’s recreational vehicle emission regulations could be subject to ARB’s LSI engine regulations. ( ROHVA)2

Comment: The most appropriate approach is that LSI engines ≤ 1.0 L used in OHRV-like applications would be immediately subject to the OHRV exhaust and evaporative emission limits. (Polaris)

Agency Response: The exhaust and evaporative emission standards for LSI engines used in vehicles similar to off-highway recreationa l vehicles are explained in the staff report (see section 3.3). Furthermore, the technol ogical feasibility of these standards is discussed in the Agency Response to Comment No. 1. The comments specifically regarding off-highway recreational vehicle classifi cation and regulations, which were raised by Polaris and ROHVA, are outside the scope of the amendments proposed in the rulemaking. Accordingly, ARB will not respond to these comments and testimony because they are not relevant to the proposed amend ments.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**POLYPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.**

** **

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Polypore International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended April 3, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, RobertB. Toth, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does herebycertify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:   May 6, 2010 | /s/ Robert B. Toth                     |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                          | Robert B. Toth                         |
|                          | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
Número Identificador

RES 20 2 4

__________

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico

TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES

PANEL E SPECIAL

TERESITA C. RIERA CARRIÓN

Recurrida

v.

JUAN C. ALBORS LAHONGRAIS

Peticionario KLCE202 4 008 96 Certiorari

p rocedente del

Tribunal de

Primera

Instancia, Sala

de Bayamón

Caso Núm.

SJ2021CV03041

Sobre:

Liquidación de

Comunidad de

Bienes

Panel integrado por su president e el Juez Bermúdez Torres

, la Jueza

Grana Martínez y la Jueza Santiago Calderón

RESOLUCIÓN

En San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 22 de agosto de 20 2 4

.

Considerad o el Recurso de Certiorari , presentad o por la parte

peticionaria, Sr. Juan C. Albors Lahongrais , el 16 de agosto de 2024,

denegamos su expedición. Regla 52.1 de Procedimiento Civil, 32

LPRA Ap. V, R. 52.1 1

.

Lo acordó el Tribunal y lo certifica la Secretaria del Tribunal

de Apelaciones.

Lcda. Lilia M. Oquendo Solís

Secretaria del Tribunal de Apelaciones

1 Dispone en lo aquí pertinente:

Al denegar la expedición de un recurso de certiorari en estos casos, el

Tribunal de Apelaciones no tiene que fundamentar su decisión.