alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 391

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 1, 2002

Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring the University of Minnesota Golden Gophers men’s

hockey and wrestling teams and the University of Minnesota-Duluth Bulldogs women’s hockey team for winning the 2002 National Collegiate Athletic Association

championships.

Whereas the University of Minnesota Gophers men’s hockey

team recently won the 2002 National Collegiate Athletic

Association championship for the 4th time in the university’s history;

Whereas the Minnesota Gophers men’s hockey team had an

impressive overall record of 32–8–4;
2

HCON 391 RFS

Whereas all but 1 of the players on the Minnesota Gophers

men’s hockey team are from Minnesota;

Whereas the Minnesota Gophers wrestling team won their

second consecutive NCAA championship in 2002;

Whereas the Minnesota Gophers wrestling team was

undefeated in the 2002 season and won the Big 10 Conference tournament;

Whereas the Minnesota Gophers wrestling team finished in

the top 3 in the Nation for the 6th consecutive year;

Whereas 7 members of the Minnesota Gophers wrestling

team earned All-American honors;

Whereas the Minnesota Gophers wrestling team produced 2

individual national champions;

Whereas on March 24, 2002, the defending NCAA Women’s

Ice Hockey National Champion, the University of Minnesota-Duluth Bulldogs, won the national championship

for the second straight year;

Whereas the Minnesota-Duluth Bulldogs women’s hockey

team defeated Brown University in the championship

game by the score of 3–2, having previously defeated Niagara University in the semi-final by the same score;

Whereas during the 2001–2002 season, the Minnesota-Duluth Bulldogs women’s hockey team won 24 games, while

losing only 6, and tying 4;

Whereas all of the players on the Minnesota-Duluth Bulldogs

women’s hockey team showed tremendous dedication

throughout the season toward the goal of winning the national championship;
3

HCON 391 RFS

Whereas all 3 of these teams display academic excellence by

maintaining an average grade point average above the

university-wide average; and

Whereas Congress should honor the excellence of athletic

teams and encourage participation in collegiate athletics

in order to build teamwork and dedication: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress honors the University of Min3 nesota Golden Gophers men’s hockey and wrestling teams

4 and the University of Minnesota-Duluth Bulldogs women’s

5 hockey team for winning the 2002 National Collegiate

6 Athletic Association championships.

Passed the House of Representatives April 30, 2002.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 394 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 394

Expressing the sense of the Congress concerning the 2002 World Cup and 
                 co-hosts Republic of Korea and Japan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2002

    Mr. Royce (for himself and Mr. Becerra) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress concerning the 2002 World Cup and 
                 co-hosts Republic of Korea and Japan.

Whereas the United States has developed close relationships with the Republic of 
        Korea and Japan;
Whereas the Republic of Korea and Japan have been close allies with the United 
        States in the war against terrorism;
Whereas the Republic of Korea and Japan will co-host the 2002 Federation 
        International Football Association (FIFA) World Cup Korea/Japan;
Whereas the 2002 FIFA World Cup Korea/Japan will be the first FIFA World Cup to 
        be held in Asia;
Whereas 32 nations have been qualified to compete from May 31 through June 30 of 
        2002, and will send some 1,500 coaches and athletes to the Republic of 
        Korea and Japan, making this year's World Cup the largest ever;
Whereas the Korean and Japanese organizing committees for the 2002 FIFA World 
        Cup Korea/Japan have effectively directed the preparations for 
        unprecedented security precautions in both host nations;
Whereas during the 2002 FIFA World Cup Korea/Japan, billions of people are 
        expected to view the competition;
Whereas the co-hosting of the FIFA World Cup by the Republic of Korea and Japan 
        symbolizes the friendly relations between the two host nations, both key 
        allies of the United States; and
Whereas the co-hosting of this international sporting event contributes to 
        enhancing peace and stability in Northeast Asia: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) appreciates the mutually beneficial relationship 
        between the United States and the Republic of Korea and the 
        United States and Japan;
            (2) commends the Republic of Korea/Japan 2002 FIFA World 
        Cup organizers for the attention they have given to security 
        precautions during the event; and
            (3) recognizes and applauds the cooperation of the 
        President of the Republic of Korea, Kim Dae-jung, and the Prime 
        Minister of Japan, Junichiro Koizumi, in the hosting of the 
        largest and most widely viewed World Cup competition in the 
        history of the sport.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer of GFI Group Inc.
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GFI Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James A. Peers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to the 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



Date:
August 15, 2005

|/s/JAMES A. PEERSJames A. Peers
Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---
#### ASSOCIATES COMMERCIAL CORPORATION v. VICK’S SAND PIT & DREDGING CO. INC. and Victor Phillip.

No. 88-C-0834.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 1988.

In re Vick’s Sand Pit & Dredging Co.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 87-CA-0560; Parish of Jefferson, 24th *1057Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 313-752.

Prior report: La.App., 522 So.2d 663.

Denied.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Roebling Financial Corp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Frank J. Travea, III, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Janice A. Summers, Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

|  

 

/s/ Frank J. Travea, III                    |   |   |  

 

/s/ Janice A. Summers                                                          |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Frank J. Travea, III

President and Chief Executive Officer |   |   | Janice A. Summers

Senior Vice President, Chief Operating

Officer and Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

July 25, 2008
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 367

Honoring the life and work of Susan B. Anthony.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 20, 2002

Mrs. MYRICK (for herself, Mrs. CUBIN, and Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia)

submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring the life and work of Susan B. Anthony.

Whereas Susan B. Anthony was committed to the ideal of

equality for all people;

Whereas Susan B. Anthony recognized the rights of unborn

children; and

Whereas Susan B. Anthony dedicated her life to protecting

the rights of women and unborn children: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress honors the life and work of

3 Susan B. Anthony.

Æ
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 149

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the Rotunda of the Capitol

for a ceremony to present posthumously a goldmedal on behalf of Congress to Charles M.Schulz.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 149

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized

3 to be used on June 7, 2001, for a ceremony to present

4 posthumously a gold medal on behalf of Congress to

5 Charles M. Schulz. Physical preparations for the ceremony
2

•HCON 149 EH

1 shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as

2 the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Porter Unemployment Compensation Case.

Argued December 12, 1961.

Before Ervin, Wright, Woodside, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ. (Rhodes, P. J., absent).

*John*McCrea, with Mm *McCrea & McCrea,*for appellant.

*Sydney Reuben,*Assistant Attorney General, with Mm *David Stahl,*Attorney General, for Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, appellee.

March 21, 1962:

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

In this unemployment compensation case the bureau found the claimant to be ineligible for benefits under *338§402(a) of the law on the ground that she had failed to accept an offer of suitable employment without good cause. The referee affirmed the bureau’s disqualification of the claimant under the provisions of §402(a) and also found the claimant ineligible under the provisions of §401 (d) of the law on the ground that she was not realistically attached to the labor market. The board affirmed the decision of the referee.

The claimant was last employed as a clerk at $1.00 per hour on a part-time basis by Porter’s Furniture Store in Shippensburg, Pennsylvania. Her last day of work was March 4, 1960, at which time she was laid off because of lack of work. On May 17,1960 the claimant was referred to a possible job opportunity as a telephone solicitor with Olan Mills, Shippensburg, Pennsylvania, at $1.00 per hour, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. or 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., for two or three weeks’ duration. The claimant discussed the employment opportunity with the prospective employer and refused to take the proffered employment because she did not wish to accept night work and also did not wish to leave her 13-year old son at home alone. During her employment with her last employer for 14 months she had made arrangements for the care of her son.

The attorney for the claimant made much of the fact that claimant was not properly referred by the bureau to the prospective employer. It is an admitted fact, however, that she discussed the proffered employment with the prospective employer and refused the employment for the reasons above given. The method employed to inform her of the proffered employment was immaterial. The important thing is that the offer was made. Under §402(a) the important issue is whether the claimant had good cause for refusing the job referral. She was able to have someone look after her son during her former employment and she admitted that she could make such an arrangement again but *339did not want to do so unless the employment were permanent. This, in our judgment, did not constitute good cause for refusing the referral and constituted sufficient grounds for refusing benefits. It is, therefore, unnecessary to consider the second reason relied upon by the board to justify refusal of benefits, to wit: §401(d).

Decision affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date: January 29, 2007/s/ A. Keith WallA. Keith WallChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130700(18) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

LEONOR CASTELLON,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130700 

 COA: 265650 

WCAC: 04-000316 

DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS 

CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order of June 

30, 2006 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

WEAVER, J., would grant reconsideration. 

KELLY, J., would grant reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would remand to 

the magistrate for the reasons given in her previous statement in this case, Castellon v 

Delphi Automotive Systems Corporation, 475 Mich 898 (2006). 

p0918 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 26, 2006 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 63 (Monday, April 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19669-19670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7821]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center For Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Neurodegeneration: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets.
    Date: April 17, 2012.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Laurent Taupenot, Ph.D, Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 4811, MSC 7850, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-1203, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8afeebfffaefe4e5e6cae9f9f8a4e4e3e2a4ede5fc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2b5f4a5e5b4e4544476b48585905454243054c445d">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis

[[Page 19670]]

Panel; Member conflict: Chemosensory, Pain and Hearing.
    Date: April 18-19, 2012.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: John Bishop, Ph.D, Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 5182, MSC 7844, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 408-
9664, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6a08031902051a002a09191844040302440d051c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="12707b617a7d6278527161603c7c7b7a3c757d64">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 27, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-7821 Filed 3-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Each of the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of Grande Communications, Inc., hereby certifies that, on the date hereof:



|1. | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Grande Communications Holdings, Inc. for the six months ending June 30, 2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Grande Communications Holdings, Inc.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                              
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 15, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    WALTER K.L. (SCOTT) FERGUSON,
JR.     
|                      |  |  |  | Walter K.L. (Scott) Ferguson, Jr.            
|                      |  |  |  | Interim Chief Executive Officer and President
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 15, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    MICHAEL L.
WILFLEY                    
|                      |  |  |  | Michael L. Wilfley                           
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer                      



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. This certification
shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.
RECORD OF COMMUNICATION

TELEPHONE CALL

DATE: July 31, 2012

SUBJECT: Ventura County APCD sumps

FROM: Nicole Law – EPA Region IX, Rules Office

Stanley Tong – EPA Region IX, Rules Office

TO: Eric Wetherbee – Ventura County APCD, Supervisor and Mutual Settlement, 

Compliance Division (805) 645-1496

SUMMARY OF COMMUNICATION:

1. Wemcos are being phased out. There used to be around 12 – 15 Wemcos in Ventura County APCD, 

now they are down to 4 – 5. 

2. He believes the reason for the reduction in use of Wemcos is because they are labor intensive to 

maintain and to keep running. There are concerns with VOC leaks and meeting Rule 74.10 leak limits.

3. Wemcos are mainly used at larger facilities for routing gases from the vapor recovery process to a 

gas pipeline.

4. The Anterra facility reinjects the wastewater into a disposal well.

5. He does not recall routinely having mg/L data unless Ventura County APCD specifically asks for it.

6. Roughly 90 – 95% of their facilities have no treatment systems for the oil production wastewater. 

The facilities just have a wash tank and the water is either trucked to a disposal site or reinjected into the 

ground.