alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aearo Company I (the 'Company'), on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the 'Report'), I,
Michael A. McLain, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                 /s/ Michael A. McLain
                                                 Michael A. McLain
                                                 Chairman, President
                                                 and Chief Executive Officer
August 15, 2005


A signed written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aearo
Company I and will be retained by Aearo Company I and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission and its staff upon request.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 223

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized

3 to be used at any time on September 12, 2001, for a pray4 er vigil in memory of those who lost their lives in the

5 events of September 11, 2001. Physical preparations for
2

•HCON 223 EH

1 the vigil shall be carried out in accordance with such con2 ditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

Passed the House of Representatives September 12

(legislative day, September 11), 2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 223

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the Rotunda of the Capitol

for a prayer vigil in memory of those who losttheir lives in the events of September 11, 2001.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 395 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 395

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 2002

        Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
      Celebrating the 50th anniversary of the Constitution of the 
                      Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

Whereas on July 3, 1952, the President signed Public Law 82-447 (66 Stat. 327), 
        approving the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico;
Whereas on July 10, 1952, the Constitutional Convention of Puerto Rico 
        reconvened and approved the conditions established by Public Law 82-447;
Whereas on July 25, 1952, Governor Luis Munoz Marin proclaimed that the 
        constitution was in effect;
Whereas the United States citizens of Puerto Rico have proudly fulfilled their 
        duties to this great Nation, and some have made the ultimate sacrifice 
        in defense of democracy, freedom, and the United States Constitution 
        since World War I; and
Whereas the cultural diversity of the United States has been enriched by the 
        people of Puerto Rico who have preserved and promoted their culture, 
        language, and identity: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress celebrates the 50th anniversary of the Constitution 
of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit
      10.2

    [WMS
      INDUSTRIES INC. LETTERHEAD]

    


     

    August
      9,
      2005

     

    Mr.
      Orrin
      J. Edidin

    c/o
      WMS
      Industries Inc.

    800
      South
      Northpoint Blvd.

    Waukegan,
      IL 60085

     

    Dear
      Orrin:

    


    In
      accordance with your employment agreement (“Employment Agreement”) with WMS
      Industries Inc. (the “Corporation”), dated February 14, 2005, you had the
      opportunity to earn an annual bonus for the Corporation’s fiscal year ended June
      30, 2005 pursuant to the Corporation’s annual performance based bonus program
      (“Bonus Program”) established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
      Directors of the Corporation. You have informed us that, effective June 30,
      2005, you rescind your right to receive any bonus payment for the Corporation’s
      fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 pursuant to your Employment Agreement and the
      Bonus Program.

     

    If
      the
      foregoing is in accordance with your agreement and understanding, please sign
      a
      copy of this letter below under the words “Accepted and Agreed to” and return it
      to the undersigned.

     

    Very
      truly yours,

     

    WMS
      Industries Inc.

     

                                                                                        
      /s/ Brian R. Gamache

    
      
        

      
Brian R. Gamache

    President
      & Chief Executive Officer

     

    Accepted
      and Agreed to:

     

     /s/
Orrin
      J.
      Edidin

    
      
        

      

    

    Orrin
      J.
      Edidin
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 2, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135783 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan SCOTT R. MOORE, D eceased, and JESSICA DOUGLAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135783 COA: 274252 WCAC: 02-000403 PRESTIGE PAINTING and CONTRUCTION ASSOCIATION OF MICHIGAN, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH , W EAVER , and K ELLY , JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

t0625 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 2, 2008

Clerk
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5 D 2 3

- 1 180 LT Case No. 202 0

- CF

- 517

_____________________________
D ASHANTI B UCKHOLTZ , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for S t. Johns County

. R. Lee Smith , Judge

. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Geo r ge D.E. Burden
, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Dashanti Buc kholtz, Panama City, p ro se.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee

.

January 9, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
W ALLIS , S OUD , and M AC I VER , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 360 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.360
                                        Agreed to March 21, 2002        

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
          the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Wednesday, March 
20, 2002, or Thursday, March 21, 2002, on a motion offered pursuant to 
this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 
stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, April 9, 2002, or until 
Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate 
recesses or adjourns at the close of business on Thursday, March 21, 
2002, Friday, March 22, 2002, or Saturday, March 23, 2002, on a motion 
offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader 
or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, 
April 8, 2002, or at such other time on that day as may be specified in 
the motion to recess or adjourn, or until Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble at 
such place and time as they may designate whenever, in their opinion, 
the public interest shall warrant it.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC (the Company) for the
quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick Bratton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 9, 2007



/s/ Patrick BrattonPatrick BrattonChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
[No. 33355-1-I.

Division One.

August 12, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. David Allen Quintasket, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 93-1-03595-7, Deborah Fleck, J., entered September 10, 1993. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Ellington, J., concurred in by Baker, C.J., and Becker, J.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certification**

I, James A. Peers,certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GFI Group Inc.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)               designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)              evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)               disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)               all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)              anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date:November 13, 2006

| /s/ JAMES A. PEERS         |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| James A. Peers             |   |
| *Chief  Financial Officer* |   |

 

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 9, 2017

No. 04-16-00533-CV

Oscar Leo QUINTANILLA,

Appellant

v.

Andrew Bradford WEST,

Appellee

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-06259

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The appellee’s unopposed motion for leave to file post submission brief is hereby 

GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED on February 9, 2017

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
#### James DINKENS, Appellant, v. The CIRCUIT COURT OF the TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, Appellee.

No. 85-197.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 19, 1986.

James Dinkens, pro se.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Mitchell D. Franks, Chief Trial Counsel, James Vail, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

SCHOONOVER, Judge.

Appellant, James Dinkens, seeks review of an order abating a civil action. We reverse.

Appellant, a convicted felon, filed a petition for name change in the Tenth Judicial Circuit. The trial court entered an order abating the petition until appellant’s civil rights were restored. The court entered its order on the basis of *Watts v. Buck,*454 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), in which we held that section 944.292, Florida Statutes (1983), prevents a convicted felon from maintaining a civil action in Florida’s courts until his civil rights have been restored.

We acknowledge that the trial court merely fulfilled its duty to follow precedent when it entered its order. In *McCuiston v. Wanicka,*483 So.2d 489 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), however, decided subsequent to *Watts,*we agreed with the decision of our sister court in *Lloyd v. Farkash,*476 So.2d 305 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). In *Lloyd,*the first district did not challenge our interpretation of section 944.292, but found that the result Violated constitutional provisions guaranteeing access to the courts.

On the basis of *McCuiston,*we reverse the trial court order abating appellant’s petition for a name change. In doing so, we distinguish our decision in *Watts,*as was done in *Lloyd*and *McCuiston,*on the *47basis that the constitutional issue was not presented in *Watts.*

Reversed and remanded.

RYDER, C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.
CROWELL & MORING LLP 

1001 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W. 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004-2595 

TELEPHONE: (202) 624-2500 

FACSIMILE: (202) 628·5 1 16 

VIA EMAIL 

Mr. PaulL. Gretch 

Director 

Office of International Aviation 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

ZUCKERT, SCOUTT & RASENBERGER, L.L.P. 

888 SEVENTEENTH STREET, N.W. 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006·3939 

TELEPHONE: (202) 973·7926 

FACSIMILE: (202) 342·0683 

April27, 2015 

Re: United/ANA- Notice of Additional Codesharing (Docket DOT-OST-2009-0344) 

Dear Mr. Gretch: 

Pursuant to the blanket statements of authorization granted to United1 and ANA, the carriers 

notify the Department of the display of the "UA *" designator code on flights operated by ANA 

between Tokyo (HND) and Hanoi (HAN) beginning on or after 30 days from the date of this letter. 

United and ANA hold the requisite underlying authority to codeshare on the Tokyo-Hanoi 

route? In addition, these services are fully consistent with the U.S.-Japan Open Skies Agreement 

and the U.S.-Vietnam Air Transport Agreement, as amended. 

Respectfully submitted, 

CROWELL & MORING LLP 

Gerald F. Murphy 

Steven J. Seiden 

gmurphy(dkrowcll.com 

sseidenra)crowell.com ---==·· ..... . 

Counsel for 

United Airlines, Inc. 

cc: Robert Finamore 

Common names are used for airlines. 

ZUCKERT, SCOUTT & RASENBERGER, L.L.P. 

/"j; ji ;1 () ·-. ' 

__ c_ .. ,_'-_-c:_b~_.,_.·_,,tf"-,;_. ----,:';::""~J"'-~~---~" ._'-:7~r"------'·=--·~·· -~/ 5 T5 

Charles J. Simpson 

David M. Endersbee 

Alexander T. Simpson 

_gj simpson@zsrla\y,~om 

dmcndcrsbceta)zsrlaw.com 

atsimpson(i:j),zsrlaw .com 

Counsel for 

All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd. 

2 See, e.g., Orders 2013-4-11 (reissuing United/Continental authorities in the name of 

"United Airlines, Inc.") and 2007-4-29 (ANA foreign air carrier permit); and Notices of Action 

Taken dated Aug. 7, 1998 (United/ANA) (Undocketed), Jan. 19, 2010 in this docket 

(Continental/ANA), and Sept. 17, 2014 in Docket DOT-OST-2004-19148 (United worldwide third 

country codesharing). 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that I have this date served the foregoing document on the following persons in 

accordance with the Department's Rules of Practice. 

robcrt.wiric~com 

howard. kass@aa.com 

jhill@coolev.com 

perkmann(q!coolev .com 

sascha.vandcrbcllen@dclta.com 

~--.~~--·~~~" "::~-·--... ~~·........; 

sametta.c. barnett(ci)dclta.com 

chris. walkeri(Ddelta.com 

nssparks@fedex.com 

April27, 2015 

sllunsford@fedcx.com 

gblcopoard(iV,fcdcx .com 

anita.mosner(a!,hklaw.com 

jennifer .nowak(c/),hklaw .com 

william.stallings@g;:;ch;)_LgQ...y 

dwight.moorc@ustranscom. mil 

john.s.duncan({~)faa.gov
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 155

Expressing the sense of Congress that comprehensive Medicare modernization

is a top priority of the 107th Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 7, 2001

Mr. GREENWOOD (for himself, Mr. DOOLEY of California, and Ms. HART)

submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that comprehensive Medicare modernization is a top priority of the 107th Congress.

Whereas the Medicare program provides important health

care coverage and life-saving services for our nation’s

senior citizens and the disabled;

Whereas today’s senior citizens, the disabled and subsequent

generations need and deserve the highest quality health

care available;

Whereas the Medicare program has changed little fundamentally since its creation over 35 years ago and has not
2

•HCON 155 IH

kept pace with many of the rapid and dramatic improvements in health care delivery;

Whereas the current benefit and management structure of

the Medicare program inhibits the flexibility to make new

health care innovations and technologies more readily accessible to its beneficiaries;

Whereas the Medicare program is facing a financing crisis

which much be addressed in order to ensure the continued success and financial integrity of the program;

Whereas Medicare beneficiaries should have the ability to

choose from a range of coverage options that best suits

their needs and provides coordination of care, health promotion, and disease prevention efforts; and

Whereas prescription drug coverage provided outside of true,

comprehensive modernization should be viewed only as an

interim step and not as a long-term final action to improve and strengthen the Medicare program: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) comprehensive modernization of the Medi4 care program could offer seniors and the disabled

5 more coverage choices, better benefits (including pre6 scription drugs), and access to the latest in innova7 tive medical practices and treatments;

8 (2) the need to include prescription drug cov9 erage in the Medicare program offers an opportunity
3

•HCON 155 IH

1 to move forward with comprehensive Medicare mod2 ernization; and

3 (3) a top priority of the 107th Congress should

4 be to modernize and strengthen the Medicare pro5 gram’s financial and structural foundations for the

6 future.

Æ
**Exhibit32.2**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of BG Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, T. Don Waddell, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|        | /s/ T. Don Waddell      |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | T. Don Waddell          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | November 14, 2006       |

 

----