alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

The meeting announced below concerns Conducting Public Health Research in South Africa, Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) GH12-004, initial review.

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

*Time and Date:* 12 p.m.-4 p.m., May 2, 2012 (Closed).

*Place:* Teleconference.

*Status:* The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.

*Matters To Be Discussed:* The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to “Conducting Public Health Research in South Africa, FOA GH12-004.”

*Contact Person for More Information:* Lata Kumar, Scientific Review Officer, CGH Science Office, Center for Global Health, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE., Mailstop D-69, Atlanta, Georgia 30033, Telephone (404) 639-7618.

The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign **Federal Register** notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Dated: March 22, 2012.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2012-7545 Filed 3-28-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 270

Expressing the sense of Congress that Americans should take time during

Native American Heritage Month to recognize the many accomplishments

and contributions made by native peoples.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 15, 2001

Mr. HAYWORTH (for himself, Mr. SIMMONS, and Mr. CANNON) submitted the

following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

Resources

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that Americans should

take time during Native American Heritage Month to

recognize the many accomplishments and contributions

made by native peoples.

Whereas Native Americans were the original inhabitants of

the lands that now constitute the United States of America;

Whereas Native American governments developed the fundamental principles of freedom of speech and separation of

powers in government, and these principles form the

foundation of the United States Government today;
2

HCON 270 IH

Whereas Native American societies exhibited a deep respect

for the Earth and its resources, and such values are

widely held today;

Whereas Native Americans have served with valor in every

American conflict, from the Revolutionary War to the

war against terrorism, often serving in greater numbers,

proportionately, than the population of the Nation as a

whole;

Whereas Native Americans have made distinct and important

contributions to the United States and the rest of the

world in many fields, including agriculture, medicine,

music, language, and art;

Whereas Native Americans deserve to be recognized for their

individual contributions to American society as artists,

sculptors, musicians, authors, poets, artisans, scientists,

and scholars;

Whereas November has been declared Native American Heritage Month because it is traditionally the month when

Native Americans harvested their crops and is generally

a time of celebratory feasting and giving thanks; and

Whereas, now, more than ever, Americans of all origins,

faiths, and beliefs need to come together as a Nation in

support of our people, our common values, and our republican principles: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) supports the goals and ideals of Native

4 American Heritage Month, and

5 (2) encourages Federal, State, local, and tribal

6 governments; interested groups and organizations;
3

HCON 270 IH

1 and the American people to honor and recognize the

2 accomplishments, contributions, and heritage of Na3 tive Americans with appropriate programs, cere4 monies, and activities.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 337 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 337

  Relative to the death of the Honorable John O. Pastore, formerly a 
                Senator from the State of Rhode Island.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 2000

     Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Chafee) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Relative to the death of the Honorable John O. Pastore, formerly a 
                Senator from the State of Rhode Island.

    Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound sorrow and deep 
regret the announcement of the death of the Honorable John O. Pastore, 
formerly a Senator from the State of Rhode Island.
    Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate communicate these 
resolutions to the House of Representatives and transmit an enrolled 
copy thereof to the family of the deceased.
    Resolved, That when the Senate adjourns today, it stand adjourned 
as a further mark of respect to the memory of the deceased Senator.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months period
      ended September 30, 2007 of the MACROshares Oil Up Tradeable Trust (the
      " **Registrant** "),
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      " **Quarterly**  **Report** "),
      I,
      John Flanagan, principal financial officer of MACRO Securities Depositor, LLC,
      which acts as the depositor for the Registrant (the " **Depositor** "),
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly represents,
                in all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
                of the
                Registrant.


Date:
        November 14, 2007
 /s/
        John A. Flanagan
 John
        A.
        Flanagan
 On
        behalf
        of the Registrant
 and
        as
        Chief Financial Officer
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 17

Expressing the sense of the Congress supporting Federal funding of

pluripotent stem cell research.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 30, 2001

Mrs. MALONEY of New York (for herself and Mrs. MORELLA) submitted the

following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

Energy and Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress supporting Federal

funding of pluripotent stem cell research.

Whereas Federal funds are crucial for researchers to proc

with stem cell research and technologies;

Whereas pluripotent stem cell research does not undermi

the current ban on Federal funding of human embryo research because pluripotent stem cells are not embryo

and cannot become embryos;

Whereas pluripotent stem cells are presursors of special

cells which are destroyed or damaged in many incurabl

diseases and disabilities;

Whereas the ability to use pluripotent stem cells to gen

specialized cells, such as the dopamine-producing ce

that are degenerated in Parkinson’s disease or the in
2

•HCON 17 IH

lin-producing cells that are impaired in diabetes, al

doctors to learn to generate the specialized cells tha

destroyed or damaged in other diseases and disabiliti

Whereas pluripotent stem cell research could lead to va

improved treatments or cures for Alzheimer’s disease

anemia, AIDS, arthritis, blindness, brain injury, birth

fects, cancer, deafness, diabetes, heart disease, ki

disease, liver disease, lung disease, Lou Gehrig’s dis

multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, Parkinson’s d

ease, severe burns, sickle cell anemia, spinal cord i

and stroke, and could also lead to improved success 

organ transplantation; and

Whereas Federal funding through the National Institutes 

Health ensures that sensitive research will be conduc

in accordance with the highest scientific and ethi

standards: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Sena

2 concurring), That the Congress supports Federal fundin

3 of pluripotent stem cell research.

fi
AAM-12-377-E 

May 29, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10161A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-1121 

Mr. Andy Rosman 

President 

Barrier Island Aviation 

407 Airport Road 

Manteo, NC 27954 

Dear Mr. Rosman: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 10161. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions 

and limitations. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated May 14, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Barrier Island Aviation for an extension of Exemption No. 10161. That exemption 

from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows Barrier Island 

Aviation, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safetysensitive employees under one testing program. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Barrier Island 

Aviation. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10161 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the conditions and limitations listed below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Barrier Island Aviation are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at 

all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

Barrier Island Aviation part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10161 to November 30, 2014, 

unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Carolyn James, Individually and As Next of Friend of Her Mother,

Mary Olive Calkins v

. Linda Carol Goehrs

Appellate case number: 01

- 12

- 00445

- CV

Trial court case number: 0875812A

Trial court: 61st District Court of Harris County

The parties are ordered to file a supplemental brief responding to the following questions.

Questions directed to Appellant James:

1. It is your contention that the trial court lacked j urisdiction because the probate court had

exclusive jurisdiction?

2. Do you agree that the trial court should have dismissed the case, even if you disagree

with the other party on the proper rationale or vehicle for dismissal?

Questions directed to Appellee Ghoers:

1. Is it your contention that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because James lacked standing

and, therefore, James’s counterclaims should have been dismissed?

2. Do you agree that the trial court should have dismissed the case, even if you disagree

wi th the other party on the proper rationale or vehicle for dismissal?

Questions for both parties:

3. If you answered “yes” to both questions addressed to you above, do you contend that the

proper resolution is a dismissal without prejudice to either party?

4. D o es this Court need to determine the proper basis for dismissal to affirm a dismissal? If

so, why?

The briefs may not exceed 5 pages in length. Both parties’ briefs are due no later than

Wednesday , December 1 1 , 2013 , at 9:00 A.M.

Neither party is permitte d to file a response to the supplemental brief of the other, absent

leave of court.

It is ORDERED.Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: D ecember 9 , 2013
391 A.2d 693

#### Commonwealth v. Edward Moore, Appellant.

Submitted December 6, 1977.

W. Donald Sparks, and Sparks, Yadino, Auerbach and Monte, for appellant; Sandra L. Gross, Assistant District Attorney, and Frank T. Hazel, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of XL Generation International Inc. (the
      “Registrant”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, Alexander C. Gilmour, Acting Principal Executive Officer of the
      Registrant, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
      knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.











Date:
      September 13, 2006


By: /s/
      Alexander C. Gilmour


Name:
      Alexander C. Gilmour


Title: 
      Acting Principal Executive Officer and
      Director
IIB

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 150

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 7, 2001

Received and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and

Pensions

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that Erik Weihenmayer’s

achievement of becoming the first blind person to climb

Mount Everest demonstrates the abilities and potential

of all blind people and other individuals with disabilities.

Whereas misconceptions and negative stereotypes about

blindness and other disabilities significantly contribute to

the challenges that individuals with blindness or other

disabilities encounter;

Whereas in order to help promote a positive public perception

of blindness, the National Federation of the Blind
2

HCON 150 RFS

sponsored the quest of Erik Weihenmayer to become the

first blind person to climb Mount Everest;

Whereas on May 23, 2001, Erik Weihenmayer, as part of a

climbing team, successfully climbed to the summit of

Mount Everest, which, at a height of 29,035 feet above

sea level, is the highest summit in the world;

Whereas Erik Weihenmayer has climbed to the summit of

Ama Dablam, Mount McKinley, El Capitan, Kilimanjaro,

Aconcagua, Vinson Massif, and Polar Circus, which is a

3,000 foot ice waterfall in Alberta, Canada;

Whereas despite his blindness, Erik Weihenmayer is a speaker, writer, acrobatic skydiver and scuba diver, long-distance cyclist, marathon runner, skier, mountaineer, and

ice and rock climber;

Whereas Erik Weihenmayer’s many accomplishments have

earned him the Health and Fitness Association Award,

the Glaucoma Foundation’s Lifetime Achievement Award,

Connecticut’s Most Courageous Athlete Award, ESPN’s

ARETE Award for courage in sports, the Distinguished

Arizonan Award, the Gene Autry Award, induction into

the National Wrestling Hall of Fame, and the honor of

carrying the Olympic Torch through Phoenix, Arizona;

and

Whereas Erik Weihenmayer’s achievements demonstrate that

blind people and other individuals with disabilities can accomplish extraordinary goals if they are provided with the

proper training and opportunities: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—
3

HCON 150 RFS

1 (1) Erik Weihenmayer’s achievement of becom2 ing the first blind person to climb Mount Everest

3 demonstrates the abilities and potential of all blind

4 people and other individuals with disabilities; and

5 (2) individuals with blindness or other disabil6 ities can overcome almost any obstacle if they are

7 provided with the appropriate resources.

Passed the House of Representatives June 6, 2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0004229 12-MAY-2015 08:56 AM
#### Steven BRIGHTWELL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 87-417.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

June 22, 1988.

Charles Brandt, Lafayette, Darrel D. Ry-land, Marksville, for plaintiffs-appellees.

David N. Crawford, Baton Rouge, for defendants-appellants.

Before DOMENGEAUX, STOKER and KING, JJ.

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

For the reasons set forth in case number 87-418, entitled *Moreau, et al v. State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development*527 So.2d 1221 (La.App.1988) handed down on this day, we affirm the ruling of the District Court.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |                                                                             |                                  |
|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                               |                                                                             |                                  |
| Date:              August 20, 2007 | By:                                                                    | /s/              Alexander C. Gilmour |
|                               | Name:              Alexander C. Gilmour                                          |
|                               | Title:              Acting Principal Executive Officer and              Director |

----
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff, v. Willie Leonard MALDONADO, Defendant.

No. 81CA0708.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

Sept. 10, 1981.

KIRSHBAUM, Judge.

This is a non-adversary appellate review pursuant to C.A.R. 4(d)(3) and § 18-1^409.5, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8) (1980 Cum. Supp.) of a sentence of three years imposed upon the defendant, Willie Leonard Maldonado, after his plea of guilty to the offense of menacing, a class five felony. The sentence exceeds the presumptive range of one to two years established by § 18-1-105(l)(a), C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8) (1980 Cum.Supp.) for class five offenses.

At the sentencing hearing, the People requested that “aggravation be found” and that defendant be “given a maximum sentence of four years on this offense.” Defense counsel requested minimum sentencing. The trial court concluded that “some aggravation will not be out of order,” and the judgment of sentence and mittimus in this case states that the trial court found “aggravating circumstances.” The trial court made no findings of any extraordinary aggravating circumstances.

Section 18-1-105(6), C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8) (1980 Cum.Supp.) requires that a defendant must be sentenced to a term within the “presumptive range” established by the General Assembly for the particular class of offense involved unless the trial court finds that “extraordinary aggravating or mitigating circumstances” are present. Section 18-1-105(7), C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8) (1980 Cum.Supp.) requires a trial *241court which imposes a sentence not within the prescribed presumptive range to make “specific written findings on the record of the case, detailing the specific extraordinary circumstances which constitute the reasons for varying from the presumptive sentence.” *People*v. *Abila,*Colo.App., 606 P.2d 81 (1980). Any “aggravating circumstances” are factors which may be considered by a trial court in determining where within the presumptive range a particular sentence should fall. Section 18-l-105(l)(b), C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8) (1980 Cum.Supp.); *People v. Gonzales,*Colo.App., 613 P.2d 905 (1980). Thus, the presence of aggravating circumstances is justification for imposing sentences at the higher end of the presumptive range.

Here, the attorneys and the trial court referred solely to “aggravating” circumstances throughout the sentencing proceedings. The judgment and mittimus also referred only to a finding of “aggravating” circumstances, and the trial court made no finding of the presence of any extraordinary aggravating circumstances. We conclude, therefore, that the imposition of sentence outside the presumptive range prescribed by the General Assembly for this class of offense was not authorized.

The sentence is vacated and the cause is remanded to the trial court for sentencing within the presumptive range provided by the General Assembly for this class five offense.

COYTE and STERNBERG, JJ., concur.