alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James MANNERS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 84CA0400.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III.

Sept. 19, 1985.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 17, 1985.

*1392Duane Woodard, Atty, Gen., Charles B. Howe, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Richard H. Forman, Sol. Gen., Dolores S. Atencio, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-ap-pellee.

David F. Vela, Colorado State Public Defender, Claire Levy, Matthew L. Goldsmith, Deputy State Public Defenders, Denver, for defendant-appellant.

METZGER, Judge.

Defendant, James Manners, appeals from the judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of second degree assault in violation of § 18-3 — 203(l)(f), C.R.S. (1984 Cum.Supp.). His sole contention on appeal is that the trial court erred by refusing to dismiss for cause a potential juror. We reverse.

During voir dire, venireman Dr. Clower revealed that he was employed part-time at the state penitentiary’s medical clinic, where he was paid on a fee basis. After an *in camera*hearing defendant challenged Dr. Clower for cause. The trial court denied the challenge. Defendant subsequently used a peremptory challenge to excuse Dr. Clower, and eventually used all of his allotted peremptory challenges.

Section 16-10-103(l)(k), C.R.S. (1978 Repl. Vol. 8), provides that a “court *shall*sustain a challenge for cause” if “the juror is ... a compensated employee of a public law enforcement agency.” (emphasis added) All penitentiary employees, including counselors and bakers, are considered “compensated employees of a public law enforcement agency.” *People v. Scott,*41 Colo.App. 66, 583 P.2d 939 (1978). Under the statute, the actual function of an employee of a law enforcement agency is irrelevant. *People v. Scott, supra.*Also, there need be no showing of actual bias on the part of the employee in order to sustain a challenge for cause. *People in Interest of R.A.D.,*196 Colo. 430, 586 P.2d 46 (1978).

The People argue that Dr. Clower was a part-time employee of the prison and did not rely on fees from the prison for all of his livelihood. Therefore, they reason, he was analogous to an independent contractor and was not a “compensated employee” as envisioned by the statute. This argument is without merit.

Dr. Clower was in fact a compensated employee of the state penitentiary. Thus, under *People v. Scott, supra*and *People in Interest of R.A.D., supra,*the defendant’s challenge for cause should have been granted.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial.

BERMAN and TURSI, JJ., concur.
[Nos. 18632-2-II; 18979-8-II.

Division Two.

July 19, 1996.]

#### Rick Shurtliff, *Appellant,*v. Clark County, *Respondent.*Rick Shurtliff, *Appellant,*v. Frank Kanekoa, *Respondent.*

Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 93-2-00576-1, Edwin L. Poyfair, J., entered August 12, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, J., concurred in by Houghton, A.C.J., and Armstrong, J.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 347

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Peace Officers’

Memorial Service.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 12, 2002

Mr. LATOURETTE (for himself and Mr. COSTELLO) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National

Peace Officers’ Memorial Service.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL

4 PEACE OFFICERS’ MEMORIAL SERVICE.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The National Fraternal Order of

6 Police and its auxiliary (in this resolution referred to as

7 the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted to sponsor a public

8 event, the 21st annual National Peace Officers’ Memorial

9 Service (in this resolution jointly referred to as the

10 ‘‘event’’), on the Capitol Grounds, in order to honor the
2

•HCON 347 IH

1 law enforcement officers who died in the line of duty dur2 ing 2001.

3 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on

4 May 15, 2002, or on such other date as the Speaker of

5 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules

6 and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

7 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed

9 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police

10 Board, the event shall be—

11 (1) free of admission charge and open to the

12 public; and

13 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of

14 Congress.

15 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall

16 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities

17 incident to all activities associated with the event.

18 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

19 Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Cap20 itol, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol

21 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and

22 other related structures and equipment, as may be re23 quired for the event.
3

•HCON 347 IH

1 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

2 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce3 ment of the restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act

4 of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), con5 cerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations

6 on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions appli7 cable to the Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.

Æ
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

I, Richard M. Cohen, Chief Financial Officer of Baseline Oil & Gas Corp.,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2006 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

(2) information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Baseline
Oil & Gas Corp.

Dated: November 14, 2006


                                               /s/ Richard M. Cohen
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Richard M. Cohen
                                               Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Narciso Barbara VALDES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 84-1777.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 20, 1986.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Nancy C. Wear, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment of conviction in all respects. Any error that occurred was either harmless or not preserved. We, nevertheless, vacate the sentences imposed and remand for resentenc-ing within the guidelines. *See Albritton v. State,*476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985).

Sentences vacated; remanded for resen-tencing.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 01, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 01, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18D0543. IN THE INTEREST OF H. E., CHILDREN (MOTHER) .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

1700722 1700723 1700724
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Nos. 99-10478

Plaintiff-Appellee, 01-10720

v. D.C. No.

NORMAN ANTHONY KING, aka Norm CR-95-00197-VRW  Northern District King; aka Norman August Klause,

of California, Defendant-Appellant.

San Francisco

ORDER 

Filed August 16, 2005

Before: Susan P. Graber, Raymond C. Fisher and

Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In this case, we affirmed the judgment of conviction on

December 23, 2002. The mandate issued on March 11, 2003.

The Supreme Court denied certiorari on June 2, 2003. On

August 9, 2004, defendant-appellant King filed a pro se

motion “requesting amendment to [the] mandate and remand

for resentencing” in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in

United States v. Booker, 125 S.Ct. 738 (2005). We construe

this motion as a motion to recall the mandate, and deny it. 

We will recall a mandate only “in extraordinary circumstances.” Calderon v. Thompson, 523 U.S. 538, 550 (1998)

(power to recall mandate is “one of last resort, to be held in

reserve against grave, unforeseen contingencies”). See also

Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460-61 (9th Cir. 1996). The

circumstances here do not qualify as such. Although the

10683
Supreme Court has invalidated the mandatory Sentencing

Guidelines under which King was sentenced, the remedy put

in place allows sentencing judges to continue to apply the

Guidelines, albeit under a new discretionary regime in which

other factors are relevant. Booker, 125 S.Ct. at 764-68; 18

U.S.C. § 3553(a). At best, defendant would be entitled to a

limited remand at which his sentencing judge could determine

whether or not to resentence. See United States v. Ameline,

409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir. 2005). 

We therefore conclude that the “extraordinary circumstances” necessary to justify recalling a mandate are not present here. 

The motion filed August 9, 2004, is denied. 

10684 UNITED STATES v. KING

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted

© 2005 Thomson/West.
Exhibit 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           I, Thomas F. Helms, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of North Atlantic
Holding Company, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350,
as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

           (1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 16, 2004

                                                     /s/ Thomas F. Helms, Jr.
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Thomas F. Helms, Jr.
                                                     Chief Executive Officer




                                       39
717 Brewster Avenue· La Grange Park· IL • 60526 

Dear Secretary Foxx, 

May 15, 2015 

Secretary Anthony Foxx 

U.S Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Docket No. DOT-OST-2015-0082 

I work in the technology industry and travel internationally about eight times a year. Although I 

tend to choose certain domestic airlines because of their loyalty programs, I still support open 

competition with foreign carriers. It is not the government's responsibility to protect the financial 

interests of U.S. airlines. They can protect their own bottom lines by offering competitive rates 

and quality service. Eliminating the competition doesn't benefit the consumer in any way. 

I have flown on foreign carriers before and find the flights to be roughly equivalent to those 

offered by domestic airlines. The competition between foreign and domestic carriers serves a 

very important purpose. It improves price, flight availability, and service for all travelers. Do not 

allow Delta, United, and American Airlines to dictate how airline agreements are negotiated with 

foreign countries. Let competition drive the market, not government interference. 

Michael Zahor 

s 10-150520-027 
Michael Zahorik 

717 Brewster Avenue 

La Grange Park, IL 60526 

s 10-150520-027 

1.4· MAY 2Q1!.5 PM 9 L 

The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

United States Department of Transportation 

ATTN: Docket Center 

Docket No. DOT-OST-2015-0082 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

'II "'''''I''" ,,,,,,,,,llllll•IJII"··l'·"''''' I I Jll•ll··' Jill I
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Universal Travel Group (the
"Company"), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November 9, 2007                 /s/ Xin Zhang
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Xin Zhang
                                        Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 21

List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant

|                                          |                        |           
|----------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | ----------
|Name                                      | State of Incorporation
|                                         
|Acceris Communications Inc.               |                        | Florida   
|Acceris Communications Corp.              |                        | Delaware  
|Transpoint Holding Corporation            |                        | Delaware  
|Local Telecom Holdings LLC                |                        | Delaware  
|Acceris Local Communications Inc.         |                        | Delaware  
|Acceris Communications Technologies, Inc. |                        | Delaware  
|I-Link Worldwide LLC                      |                        | Utah      
|I-Link Systems Inc.                       |                        | Utah      
|I-Link Communications Inc.                |                        | Utah      
|Mibridge Inc.                             |                        | New Jersey
|Vianet Technologies                       |                        | Israel    
|Waters Edge Scanning Associates, Inc.     |                        | Utah      
|WebtoTel Inc.                             |                        | Delaware  
|CPT-1 Holdings Inc.                       |                        | Delaware  
|Solomon Datatransport, Inc.               |                        | Delaware
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of SmartPros Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
the undersigned, Allen S. Greene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and
Stanley P. Wirtheim, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

              A signed original of this written statement has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

                                               /s/ ALLEN S. GREENE
                                              -----------------------
                                                  Allen S. Greene
                                              Chief Executive Officer

                                              /s/STANLEY P. WIRTHEIM
                                              -----------------------
                                                Stanley P. Wirtheim
                                              Chief Financial Officer

November 7, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 324 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 324

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 13, 2002

                                Received

                             April 29, 2002

             Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Commending President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan for his leadership 
         and friendship and welcoming him to the United States.

Whereas President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan has showncourageous leadership in 
        cooperating with the United States in the fight against terrorism;
Whereas President Musharraf has shown great fortitude in confronting extremists 
        and outlawing terrorism in Pakistan;
Whereas the efforts of President Musharraf in fighting terrorism are both in the 
        national interest of Pakistan and of great importance to Pakistani-
        American relations;
Whereas the war against terrorism underscores the importance of strengthening 
        the historic bilateral relationship between the United States and 
        Pakistan;
Whereas President Musharraf has worked to improve the political representation 
        of minorities in Pakistan; and
Whereas the Pakistani-American community in the United States makes important 
        contributions to the United States and plays a vital role in developing 
        a closer relationship between the peoples of the United States and 
        Pakistan: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress commends President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan for his 
leadership and friendship and welcomes him to the United States.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 12, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
From: Garth Tayler [mailto:gtayler@brick.com]

Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 5:26 PM

To: Raymond, Gabrielle <graymond@rti.org>

Cc: 'Susan Miller' <SMiller@bia.org>

Subject: RE: Acme green brick testing results

Dear Gabrielle

We are working on this and should get this to you this week.

Regards

Garth Tayler

Dr. Garth Tayler

Technical Director

Acme Brick Company

Fort Worth, Texas.

(817) 907 1208 (cell)

(817) 8708354 (office)

From: Raymond, Gabrielle <graymond@rti.org>

Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 5:01 PM

To: 'gtayler@brick.com' <gtayler@brick.com>

Subject: Acme green brick testing results

Hello Mr. Tayler,

I am attaching a spreadsheet of the Acme facilities that provided green brick testing results to

EPA via BIA. I’ve added some columns at the end for the Name of Clay Deposit, Geological

Age of the Deposit, and Latitude/Longitude of the Clay Deposit. I know you were working on a

file to send to me, so if this makes it easier, you can fill out this spreadsheet, or continue with

you r file. Whatever is easier for you, any information you are able to provide about the clay

deposits will be much appreciated and helpful!

Thank you for your help,

Gabrielle

Gabrielle Raymond

RTI International

3040 Cornwallis Road

P.O. Box 12194

Researc h Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541

- 7015

<< Green Brick Testing Results

- 032515BIA

- to EPA May 4 2015_Acme.xlsx>>
#### Perry Ann CHRISTION, Appellant, v. OAKWOOD NURSING CENTER & United Self Insured, Appellees.

No. BI-467.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 16, 1986.

George J. Adler, Orlando, for appellant.

John E. McLain, Orlando, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The final order of the deputy commissioner is vacated and this cause is remanded for a hearing de novo. *Arnold Lumber*
      *171
      *Company v. Harris,*469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

ERVIN, WENTWORTH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
Hg CEMS Data Used to Asses Averaging Times

VOLUME 1 (Hg_CEMS_Data_Volume_1.xlsx)

1 3_ESP (4A) Exit

2 3_FGD Stack 5

3 3_Shared Stack 1 2 3

4 7_Shared Stack 1 2

5 8_Shared Stack 6 7

6 8_Shared Stack 8 9 10

7 10_Shared Stack 1 2

8 26_FGD Stack 5

9 26_Shared Stack 1 2

10 26_Shared Stack 3 4

11 47_SK001

12 50_SK001

13 50_SK003

VOLUME 2 (Hg_CEMS_Data_Volume_2.xlsx)

14a 130_C1

14b 130_C1_RMVD

15a 130_C2

15b 130_C2_RMVD

16 703_Scrubber Stack (2)

17 703_Scrubber Stack (3)

18 709_Shared Stack 3 4

VOLUME 3 (Hg_CEMS_Data_Volume_3.xlsx)

19a 1047_Unit 4 Stack

19b 1047_Unit 4 Stack_RMVD

20a 1048_Unit 2 Stack

20b 1048_Unit 2 Stack_RMVD

21a 1104_Stack - 1

21b 1104_Stack - 1_RMVD

22 1378_SK001

23 1378_SK003
24 1552_Stack 1

25 1552_Stack 2

26 1554_Stack 2

27 1554_Stack 3

28a 1570_9A

28b 1570_9A_RMVD

29a 1570_9B

29b 1570_9B_RMVD

30 1606_STK1

31 2187_Stack1

VOLUME 4 (Hg_CEMS_Data_Volume_4.xlsx)

32 2451_Unit 1 Stack

33 2451_Unit 2 Stack

34 2451_Unit 3 Stack

35 2451_Unit 4 Stack

36a 3178_Stack_2

36b 3178_Stack_2_RMVD

37a 3181_Stack 4

37b 3181_Stack 4_RMVD

38 3396_SK001

39 3399_SK001

40 3403_SK001

41 3403_SK002

42 3406_SK001

43 3644_Stck 1

44 3644_Stck 2

45a 3845_FGDSSTACK1

45b 3845_FGDSSTACK1

VOLUME 5 (Hg_CEMS_Data_Volume_5.xlsx)

46a 3845_FGDSSTACK2

46b 3845_FGDSSTACK2

47 4041_OCPP-S13
48a 4050_ESP Outlet 4

48b 4050_ESP Outlet 4_RMVD

49a 4050_Stack - 5

49b 4050_Stack - 5_RMVD

50a 4054_U1U2 CS Stack

50b 4054_U1U2 CS Stack_RMVD

51 4158_STK41

52 4158_STK42

53 4158_STK43

54 4158_STK44

55 4162_STK 1

56 4162_STK 2

57 4162_STK 3

VOLUME 6 (Hg_CEMS_Data_Volume_6.xlsx)

58 6002_Stack 1

59 6002_Stack 2

60 6002_Stack 3

61 6002_Stack 4

62 6076_1STACK

63 6076_2STACK

64 6076_3STACK

65 6076_4STACK

66 6101_STK1

67 6165_STK1

VOLUME 7 (Hg_CEMS_Data_Volume_7.xlsx)

68 6165_STK2

69 6165_STK3

70 6170_PPPPS1

71 6170_PPPPS2

72 6193_Stack 2

73 6193_Stack 3

74 6194_1St
75 6194_2St

76a 6254_Stack-1

76b 6254_Stack-1_RMVD

77 6257_Stack 3

VOLUME 8 (Hg_CEMS_Data_Volume_8.xlsx)

78a 6761_S101

78b 6761_S101_RMVD

79a 8023_Unit 1 Stack

79b 8023_Unit 1 Stack_RMVD

80a 8023_Unit 2 Stack

80b 8023_Unit 2 Stack_RMVD

81 8066_STK1

82 8066_STK2

83 8066_STK3

84 8066_STK4

85 8069_Stk1

86 8069_Stk2

87a 56224_STK1

87b 56224_STK1_RMVD