alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:* Engineering Advisory Committee Meeting, # 1170.

*Date/Time:* April 11, 2012: 12 p.m. to 6 p.m.; April 12, 2012: 8 a.m. to 2 p.m.

*Place:* National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1235, Arlington, Virginia 22203.

*Type of Meeting:* Open.

*Contact Person:* Deborah Young, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 505, Arlington, Virginia 22203.

*Purpose of Meeting:* To provide advice, recommendations and counsel on major goals and policies pertaining to engineering programs and activities.

*Agenda:* The principal focus of the meeting on both days will be to discuss emerging issues and opportunities for the Directorate for Engineering and its divisions and review Committee of Visitors Reports.

Dated: March 23, 2012.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-7514 Filed 3-28-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
**CERTIFICATIONS**




**EXHIBIT
      31.2**


I,
      Robert
      M. Blodgett, certify that:





1.  I
      have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Vivid Learning Systems,
      Inc.




2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
      a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
      made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
      not
      misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
      report;




3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4.  The
      registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
      and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
      Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have;




Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;




Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and




Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the period covered by this quarterly report
      that
      has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
      registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
      (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




All
      significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Date: August 13, 2007
            
            /s/ Robert M. BlodgettRobert
              M. BlodgettChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John A. Flanagan, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the MacroShares $100 Oil Down Trust;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors, the board of managers of Macro Securities Depositor, LLC, and the audit committee of MacroMarkets LLC (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves persons who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2008

| |                                                               
| | --------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ John A. Flanagan                                          
| | John A. Flanagan                                              
| | Chief Financial Officer of Depositor, 
on behalf of Registrant
Exhibit 32.2  Section 1350 Certification  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lotus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Yan Zeng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  August 13, 2010/s/ Yan ZengYan Zeng, Chief Financial Officer,
principal financial and accounting officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND **

**CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                L. Paul Latham                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| L.                Paul Latham                                           |
| President                and Chief Executive Officer                    |
| of                Southwest Royalties, Inc., the                        |
| Managing                General Partner of                              |
| Southwest                Royalties Institutional Income Fund IX-B, L.P. |
|                                                                    |
| April                5, 2007                                            |
|                                                                    |
|                                                                    |
| /s/                Mel G. Riggs                                         |
| Mel                G. Riggs                                             |
| Vice                President and Chief Financial Officer of            |
| Southwest                Royalties, Inc., the                           |
| Managing                General Partner of                              |
| Southwest                Royalties Institutional Income Fund IX-B, L.P. |
|                                                                    |
| April                5,                2007                             |
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of GFI Group Inc.
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GFI Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Gooch, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to the 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



Date:
August 15, 2005

|/s/MICHAEL GOOCHMichael Gooch
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                                             |  | 

---
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Each of the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of Grande Communications, Inc., hereby certifies that, on the date hereof:



|1. | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Grande Communications Holdings, Inc. for the nine months ending September 30, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Grande Communications Holdings, Inc.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                           
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: November 5, 2004 |  | /s/ William E. Morrow                     
|                       |  | William E. Morrow Chief Executive Officer 
|                       | 
|Date: November 5, 2004 |  | /s/ Michael L. Wilfley                    
|                       |  | Michael L. Wilfley Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. This certification
shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent this Exhibit 32 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.
#### Douglas Anthony SPITZNAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-82-408.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

July 29, 1983.

Stephen Jones, Jones, Gungoll, Jackson, Collins & Dodd, Enid, for appellant.

Michael C. Turpén, Atty. Gen., Hugh A. Manning, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge:

Douglas Anthony Spitznas, appellant, was charged and tried in the District Court of Garfield County, Case No. CRF-80-398, for the offenses of Rape in the First Degree, and sodomy. He was convicted by a jury on January 8, 1982, and was sentenced to ten (10) years’ imprisonment for the first degree rape and to five (5) years for the offense of sodomy.

In his sole assignment of error, the appellant contends that the trial court committed fundamental error by failing to instruct the jury concerning the definition of “reasonable doubt.” The appellant cites *In Re Winship,*397 U.S. 358, 90 S.Ct. 1068, 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970), which held that the constitutional standard of proof in criminal cases is proof beyond a reasonable doubt. We find this standard was employed by the trial court. There is no constitutional requirement that the definition of “reasonable doubt” be given to the jury. The law in Oklahoma concerning the definition of reasonable doubt is well settled. In *Johnson v.*State, 632 P.2d 1231 (Okl.Cr.1981), the court held that the phrase “reasonable doubt” is self-explanatory and definitions of it do not clarify its meaning but only tend to confuse *1308the jury. *Templer v. State,*494 P.2d 667 (Okl.Cr.1972); *Pannell v. State,*640 P.2d 568, 570 (Okl.Cr.1982).

We are of the opinion that the appellant received the proper instruction from the trial court; the judgment is therefore AFFIRMED.

CORNISH and BRETT, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit** **32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of MPC Corporation (the “*Company*”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “*Report*”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|           | /s/ Michael R. Whyte    |
|----------------|-------------------------|
| March 30, 2007 | Michael R. Whyte        |
|           | Chief Financial Officer |
I am filing for a Section 333 exemption for a DJI Phantom unmanned aircraft. I agree to the terms for

applying for a Certificate of Waiver or Authorization. I will stay below 200 feet, and the drone weighs less than 55 pounds, operate during daytime Visual Flight Rules conditions, and operate within visual line of sight. I will stay 5 nautical miles away from an airport with an operational control tower, or 3 nautical miles from an airport with a published instrument flight procedure, but not an opera tional tower, or 2 nautical miles from an airport without a published instrument flight procedure or an operational tower, or 2 nautical miles from a heliport with a published instrument flight procedure.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 56 (Friday, March 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17745-17746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06637]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8244]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Burma

    Pursuant to Section 7031(b)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. 
L. 112-74) (``the Act''), and Department of

[[Page 17746]]

State Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it 
is important to the national interest of the United States to waive the 
requirements of Section 7031(b)(1) of the Act with respect to Burma and 
I hereby waive this restriction.
    This determination and the accompanying Memorandum of Justification 
shall be reported to the Congress, and the determination shall be 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: December 4, 2012.
Thomas R. Nides,
Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources.

    Editorial Note:,  This document was received at the Office of 
the Federal Register March 19, 2013.

[FR Doc. 2013-06637 Filed 3-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-30-P
```
#### Janet WILSON, Appellant, v. The PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Appellee.

No. 57208.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

May 4, 1982.

Rick Rodgers, Duncan, for appellant.

Steve Lile, Lawton, for appellee.

IRWIN, Chief Justice:

The trial court denied appellant recovery on an insurance policy because her injury *522was within a category which was excluded from coverage. Appellant appealed and we affirm.

Appellant was an employee of a nursing center. She was not covered by Workers’ Compensation. She was, however, covered as a dependent by her husband’s health insurance, a group policy written by the appellee for her husband’s employer. A clause in that policy made the following exclusion from coverage:

> ... charges incurred in connection with (a) injury arising out of, or in the course of, any employment for wage or profit or (b) disease covered, with respect to such employment, by any workmen’s compensation law, occupational disease law or similar legislation.

The appellant was injured during the course of her employment and she filed a claim under her husband’s insurance policy. When the appellee refused to pay the claim, she filed her action in the district court. The district court sustained appellee’s demurrer, ruling that the above quoted clause excluded appellant from coverage for injuries sustained in the course of her employment.

The Court of Appeals in *Wilson v. Prudential Insurance Company of America,*Okl.App. 528 P.2d 1135 (1974), considered an identical exclusionary clause as presented here and affirmed a trial court’s order denying recovery on the theory that an injury that occurred in the course of insured’s employment was excluded from coverage. We agree with the court of appeals.

The decision of the Court of Appeals in *Wilson v. Prudential Insurance Company of America,*Okl.App. 528 P.2d 1135 (1974) is approved for official publication but only that part of the opinion relating to the exclusionary clause is given precedential value. That part of the opinion which relates to “damages in addition to the benefits allegedly owing under the insurance policy ...” is disapproved. See *Christian v. American Home Assurance Company,*Okl. 577 P.2d 899 (1978), promulgated approximately three and one-half years after *Wilson v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, supra,*became final.

We hold that appellant’s injury was excluded from coverage and the trial court correctly sustained the appellee’s demurrer.

AFFIRMED. '

BARNES, V. C. J., and HODGES, LAVENDER, SIMMS, HARGRAVE, OPALA, and WILSON, JJ., concur.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 390

To commend the exemplary leadership of the Democratic Leader.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 15 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. LOTT (for himself, Mr. NICKLES, and Mr. REID) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To commend the exemplary leadership of the Democratic

Leader.

1 Resolved, That the thanks of the Senate are hereby

2 tendered to the distinguished Democratic Leader, the Sen3 ator from South Dakota, the Honorable Thomas A.

4 Daschle, for his exemplary leadership and the cooperative

5 and dedicated manner in which he has performed his lead6 ership responsibilities in the conduct of Senate business

7 during the second session of the 106th Congress.

Æ