alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w2



 




Exhibit 10.2



AMENDMENT TO:



CONSULTING AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) entered into as of April 1,2003 by and between Save the World
Air, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Adrian Menzell (“Consultant’). This Amendment
(“Amendment”) is in accordance with guidelines contained in Section 11. “Amendments; Consents” of
said “Agreement.”



Section 5. Term of said Agreement is herewith amended as follows:



This Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2006, unless earlier terminated in accordance with
this Section 5. In addition, this Agreement shall terminate automatically upon the death of
Consultant, or the mental or physical incapacity of Consultant for a period of 60 consecutive
days. Either party hereto may terminate this Agreement upon material breach of this Agreement by
the other party; and the Company may terminate this Agreement upon a material breach of the
Confidentiality Agreement by Consultant.



All other terms and condition of said Agreement, including those contained on: ANNEX
A-“CONSULTANT’S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES;” ANNEX B “CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT” and ANNEX
C-“ONSULTANT’S COMPENSATION” shall remain in full force and effect.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed or caused their respective duly authorized officer to
execute this Amendment as of April 1, 2005. The Amendment is to be attached and considered a part
of said Agreement.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CONSULTANT


	 
	 	By 	/s/ Adrian Menzell
	 
	 	Name:  Adrian Menzell 	 
	 	 	 
	 
	 	SAVE THE WORLD AIR, INC.


	 
	 	By 	/s/ Eugene E. Eichler
	 
	 	Name:  Eugene E. Eichler 	 
	 	Title:    President
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Manuel A. VELASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 80SA263.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

May 24, 1982.

*851Dale Tooley, Dist. Atty., 0. Otto Moore, Asst. Dist. Atty., Brooke Wunnicke, Chief Appellate Deputy Dist. Atty., Denver, for plaintiff-appellant.

J. Gregory Walta, Colo. State Public Defender, Brian K. Holland, Deputy State Public Defender, Denver, for defendant-ap-pellee.

HODGES, Chief Justice.

This is one of two cases announced today in which the prosecution challenges the trial court’s dismissal of the charges based on its finding that the prosecution failed to make reasonable efforts to locate the informant pursuant to the trial court’s disclosure order. The other case is *People v. Rodriguez,*Colo., 645 P.2d 851 (1982).

Defendant Velasquez was charged with having sold narcotic drugs, namely heroin, in violation of section 12-22-302, C.R.S. 1973, to a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) undercover agent on May 10, 1979.

The defendant filed a Motion to Compel Disclosure of a Confidential Informant. The same informant as was involved in *People v. Rodriguez, supra,*is the informant in this ease. The motion was granted and subsequently when the trial court’s order for disclosure was not fully complied with, the trial court dismissed the charges.

In this ease, as in *People v. Rodriguez, supra,*the trial court found the informant to be an eye and ear witness to the criminal transaction. The same efforts by the prosecution to locate the informant are also present here. Based thereon, the trial court dismissed the charges because of the prosecution’s failure to satisfy the “reasonable efforts to locate” requirement as established in *People v. Butcher,*194 Colo. 22, 568 P.2d 1169 (1977).

The arguments for reversal raised here by the district attorney are identical to those presented in *People v. Rodriguez, supra.*We rejected those arguments there and do so again here.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.
[Nos. 14528-0-III; 14529-8-III.

Division Three.

July 25, 1996.]

#### In the Matter of the Dependency of B.N. In the Matter of the Dependency of M.N., III. S.N., *Appellant,*v. The State of Washington, *Respondent.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for Aso-tin County, Nos. 94-5-00089-2 and 94-5-00090-6, John M. Lyden, J., entered October 28, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Thompson, J., concurred in by Sweeney, C.J., and Schultheis, J.
**Exhibit 15**

May 12, 2006

GFI Group Inc.100 Wall StreetNew York, New York

We have made a review, in accordance with thestandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), ofthe unaudited interim financial information of GFI Group Inc. and subsidiariesfor the three-month periods ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, as indicated inour report dated May 12, 2006; because we did not perform an audit, weexpressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, whichis included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended March 31, 2006, is being incorporated by reference in RegistrationStatement No. 333-133374 on Form S-3 and RegistrationStatement No. 333-122905 on Form S-8.

Wealso are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) underthe Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the RegistrationStatements prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared orcertified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHELLP

New York, New York

1

----
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-3030

___________________________

United States of America, for the use and benefit of Triple S Alarm Co., Inc.

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Westfield Insurance Company

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

____________

 Submitted: April 9, 2013

Filed: April 12, 2013 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Triple S Alarm Co., Inc., appeals from the judgment of the District Court1

denying its motion for attorney fees and a penalty under Arkansas law or attorney fees

1

The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas.
under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(b), in Triple S’s suit under

the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 3131. After careful de novo review of the record, see

United States v. Brummels, 15 F.3d 769, 771 (8th Cir. 1994), and having considered

the parties’ submissions on appeal, we agree with the District Court that Triple S was

not entitled to the relief that it sought for the reasons explained in the court’s opinion.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
**CERTIFICATIONS**
  **EXHIBIT
31.2**
 I, Robert
M. Blodgett, certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Vivid Learning Systems,
Inc.
  2.  Based on
my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
  3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
  4.  The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have;
  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
  Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by this quarterly report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  All
significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
  ****Date: May 10, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Robert M.
    BlodgettRobert M. BlodgettChief Financial
      Officer
III

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 356

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 1, 2002

Received and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the Greater

Washington Soap Box Derby.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),
2

HCON 356 RFS

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES

2 ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

3 The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Associa4 tion (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Association’’)

5 shall be permitted to sponsor a public event, soap box

6 derby races, on the Capitol Grounds on June 22, 2002,

7 or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of Rep8 resentatives and the Committee on Rules and Administra9 tion of the Senate may jointly designate.

10 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

11 The event to be carried out under this resolution shall

12 be free of admission charge to the public and arranged

13 not to interfere with the needs of Congress, under condi14 tions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and

15 the Capitol Police Board; except that the Association shall

16 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities

17 incident to all activities associated with the event.

18 SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

19 For the purposes of this resolution, the Association

20 is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds, subject

21 to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, such stage,

22 sound amplification devices, and other related structures

23 and equipment as may be required for the event to be car24 ried out under this resolution.
3

HCON 356 RFS

1 SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

2 The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police

3 Board are authorized to make any such additional ar4 rangements that may be required to carry out the event

5 under this resolution.

6 SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

7 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce8 ment of the restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act

9 of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), con10 cerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations

11 on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions appli12 cable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event

13 to be carried out under this resolution.

Passed the House of Representatives April 30, 2002.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 191 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 191

   Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the importance of 
        parents and children eating dinner together as a family.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2001

  Mr. Rangel submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the importance of 
        parents and children eating dinner together as a family.

Whereas the use of illegal drugs and the abuse of alcohol and nicotine 
        constitute the greatest threats to the well-being of America's children;
Whereas surveys conducted by the National Center on Addiction and Substance 
        Abuse have consistently found that children and teenagers who routinely 
        eat dinner with their parents are far less likely to use illegal drugs, 
        alcohol, and cigarettes;
Whereas teenagers who virtually never eat dinner with their families are 72 
        percent more likely than the average teenager to use illegal drugs, 
        alcohol, and cigarettes;
Whereas the correlation between family dinners and reduced risk for teen 
        substance abuse is well documented;
Whereas parental influence is known to be one of the most crucial factors in 
        determining the likelihood of substance abuse by teenagers; and
Whereas family dinners have long constituted a substantial pillar of family life 
        in America;
Whereas a National Family Day, A Day to Eat Dinner With Your Children, on 
        Monday, Septemeber 24, 2001, would encourage families to eat together: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) eating dinner together as a family is an important step 
        toward preventing drug, alcohol, and cigarette use by children; 
        and
            (2) a National Family Day, A Day to Eat Dinner With Your 
        Children, should be established to encourage parents and 
        children to eat dinner together regularly as a family.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

August 24, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00306

- CV

Cynthia L. BARKMAN and Charles N. Barkman,

Appellant s

v.

USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK

,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CV01936 Honorable Jason Wolff, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due on August 5 , 201 5

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). To date, Appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time to file the brief. See id. R. 38.6(d)

. Therefore, we ORDER Appellant to show cause in writing within TEN DAYS from the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See id.

R. 38.8(a) , 42.3(b), (c).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of August, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court
exv10w19w7



 







Exhibit 10.19.7




AMENDMENT No. 1 to

AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION

EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN





The Employee Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the “Plan”), and as
approved by the stockholders on April 28, 2005, is hereby amended effective April 28, 2005,
as follows:




	1.	 	Subparagraph (ii) of Article 3.2 of the Plan is amended to read as follows:






	 	“(ii)	 	Determine the number of shares to be subject to such Options or Stock Appreciation
Rights granted to the selected Employees; provided, however, that no Employee shall be
granted Options or Stock Appreciation Rights covering in excess of an aggregate of 400,000
shares and rights during any calendar year; and”






	2.	 	All other terms and conditions of the Plan remain in full force and effect.
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer of GFI Group Inc.Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GFIGroup Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, James A. Peers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

1.                 The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: May 12, 2008

 
| /s/ JAMES  A. PEERS        |     |
|----------------------------|----------|
| James  A. Peers            |     |
| *Chief  Financial Officer* | * * |

 

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 11, 2019

No. 04-19-00386-CR

Kelly Elaine COURVELLE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6404

Honorable Kirsten Cohoon, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due

November 4, 2019.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 11th day of October, 2019.

___________________________________

LUZ ESTRADA,

Chief Deputy Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 378 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 378

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 24, 2002

        Received and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Commending the District of Columbia National Guard, the National Guard 
    Bureau, and the entire Department of Defense for the assistance 
      provided to the United States Capitol Police and the entire 
   Congressional community in response to the terrorist and anthrax 
                 attacks of September and October 2001.

Whereas the terrorist and anthrax attacks of September and October 2001 required 
        Congress and the entire Congressional community to respond to a 
        heightened state of emergency;
Whereas the men and women of the United States Capitol Police were required to 
        shoulder the greatest burden of this emergency response by working 
        tremendously

increased hours under difficult conditions, requiring great sacrifices by 
them and their families;

Whereas the District of Columbia National Guard responded to the call of the 
        Capitol Police Board and provided National Guard troops to assist the 
        United States Capitol Police in protecting the Capitol complex, 
        providing great relief to the members of the United States Capitol 
        Police; and
Whereas the combined efforts of the United States Capitol Police and the 
        District of Columbia National Guard have made the Capitol complex secure 
        for Members of Congress, Congressional employees, and visitors, and 
        thereby have enabled Congress to continue to discharge its 
        constitutional duties on behalf of the American people: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress commends the District of Columbia National Guard, the 
National Guard Bureau, and the entire Department of Defense for the 
assistance provided to the United States Capitol Police and the entire 
Congressional community in response to the terrorist and anthrax 
attacks of September and October 2001.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 23, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
AMERICAN
PATRIOT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.




CERTIFICATIONS




I, John
D. Belew, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Patriot Financial Group,
Inc.




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;




b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;




c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;




5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors:




a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that in volves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting.




Date:
      November 16 , 2009
              Signature:
              /s/
      John D. BelewJohn
      D. Belew

                Chief
      Executive Officer