alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[No. 36087-6-I.

Division One.

July 15, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Paul S. Ritchie, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-1-05244-2, George A. Finkle, J., entered January 30, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Buffets Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending April 6, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Michael Andrews, Jr., Chief
Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 
| | 
|
|
|
|
|
| | 
| | 
|
| | 
| | 
| | 
| | 
| |
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 24, 2011

t0516 

# Order

May 24, 2011

142493

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142493 COA: 301422 Wayne CC: 09-026016-FC THEODORE MAURICE BELL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 10, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Abington Community Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jack J. Sandoski, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


                                                /s/ Jack J. Sandoski
                                                ---------------------------
                                                Jack J. Sandoski
                                                Senior Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                May 12, 2006



      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Abington Community Bancorp, Inc. and
will be retained by Abington Community Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Todd Weintraub, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Todd
      WeintraubTodd
      WeintraubChief
      Financial OfficerNovember
      5, 2009




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 230

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the establishment of a National

Day of Remembrance.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 14, 2001

Mr. WYNN (for himself and Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the

establishment of a National Day of Remembrance.

Whereas on September 11, 2001, evil acts of terrorism were

perpetrated against the people of the United States and

all humanity;

Whereas thousands of people lost their lives as a result of the

terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001;

Whereas hundreds of fire fighters, police officers, and rescue

workers gave their lives in a valiant effort to save the

lives of other victims of these horrific terrorist attacks;

Whereas neither the Government nor the people of the United

States will be deterred by acts of terrorism;
2

•HCON 230 IH

Whereas the Government and people of the United States are

united in the effort to stand against any future acts of

terrorism; and

Whereas the establishment of September 11 as a National

Day of Remembrance would provide an opportunity to remember the victims who lost their lives as a result of

these vicious terrorist attacks, and to honor the people of

the United States who displayed heroism and courage

during and after the attacks: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) a National Day of Remembrance should be estab4 lished to remember the victims who lost their lives as a

5 result of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and

6 to honor the people of the United States who displayed

7 heroism and courage during and after the attacks; and

8 (2) the President should issue a proclamation calling

9 on the people of the United States to observe such a day

10 with appropriate programs and activities.

Æ
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 127

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp

should be issued by the United States Postal Service honoring Roy

Campanella, and that the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee should

recommend to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 3, 2001

Mr. RANGEL submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative

postage stamp should be issued by the United States

Postal Service honoring Roy Campanella, and that the

Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend

to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.

Whereas Roy Campanella, nicknamed ‘‘Campy’’, was born on

November 19, 1921, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and

was the first African-American catcher in the history of

major league baseball;

Whereas Roy Campanella, an expert handler of pitchers and

a natural leader who played with the Brooklyn Dodgers

from 1948 to 1957, won the National League’s Most Valuable Player Award in 1951, 1953, and 1955, led National League catchers in putouts 6 times, hit 242 home
2

•HCON 127 IH

runs during his major league career, and played in 5

World Series;

Whereas Roy Campanella, whose 10-year career was ended by

a tragic automobile accident in 1958, was later inducted

into the National Baseball Hall of Fame in 1969, garnering nearly 80 percent of the votes on ballots cast; and

Whereas Roy Campanella died on June 26, 1993, in Woodland Hills, California, and was among the most elite and

unique baseball players in the history of major league

baseball: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be

4 issued by the United States Postal Service honoring

5 Roy Campanella; and

6 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

7 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

8 such a stamp be issued.

Æ
H. Con. Res. 1 Agreed to January 4, 2001

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of

Saturday, January 6, 2001, it stand adjourned until 10 a.m. on

Saturday, January 20, 2001; and that when the House adjourns

on Saturday, January 20, 2001, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m.

on Tuesday, January 30, 2001, or until noon on the second day

after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2

of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when

the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on Saturday,

January 6, 2001; Sunday, January 7, 2001; Monday, January 8,

2001; Tuesday, January 9, 2001; Wednesday, January 10, 2001;

Thursday, January 11, 2001; Friday, January 12, 2001; Saturday,

January 13, 2001; Sunday, January 14, 2001; Monday, January

15, 2001; Tuesday, January 16, 2001; Wednesday, January 17,

2001; Thursday, January 18, 2001; or Friday, January 19, 2001;

on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its

Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned

until 10 a.m. on Saturday, January 20, 2001, or until such time

on that day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his

designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on

the second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant

to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.

SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader

of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority

Leader of the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall

notify the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively,
H. Con. Res. 1—2

to reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall

warrant it.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The certification set forth below is being submittedin connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MuellerGroup, LLC (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode.

I, Jeffery W. Sprick, the Chief Financial Officer ofMueller Group, LLC, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.                the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Mueller Group, LLC.
| Date: May 9, 2006 | By:    | /s/ JEFFERY W. SPRICK      |
|------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|                   |   | Jeffery W. Sprick          |
|                   |   | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

----
### 7/28/2013 9:06PM (UTC -7:00) From:8009806858 To: 12024932251

Docket Operations, 

### U.S. Department ofTransportation M-30, room Wl2-l40 1200New Jersey Avenue SE. Washington,DC 20590-0001 Reference: Docket No. 

### FAA.-2013-0392 Dear Sirs/Madam: 

### 2R July 20;t3**1.:~;~:1** 

### .., .......

WST desires to identity our concern as well as state the impottance ofan open FAA data access environment. WSI provides operational services to airlines, airports, and other NAS users that rely on the conveyance ofFAA to meet ref,'Uiatory compliance and compa11y operational goals. In the broadest context, we sec ourselves as a pattner with the FAAin achieving the efficiency, safety, and smooth operations ofour nation's airspace; a sentimentthat is likely shared across our technology counterparts. Signi±icant changes in data release policy, and more substantively the posture and process ofdata access, has the potential to negatively impact the overallperformance ofthe NAS andthe suiTounding dependent industry. Inregard to the 10 points proposed in the Register announcement, it is unclear as to the specific scenarios that these apply and the. specific impacts oftheirpotential implementation. WSI is pleased to offer comment and recommendation to future proposed policyand process documents that liave fmther insight into specific envisioned changes. As WSI is a notable consumer ofthe ASDI class I data, we offer a briefcomment here to highlight concern in changes to the data access protile ofthispmticular type. WSI conducted a client survey that was responded to by 28 part 121 and 135 operators. Resounding in lhese responses was an overall consensus to the importance ofmaintaining access to this data for, most importantly, compliance and safety reasons. The.details ofthis market survey canbe discussed further in a private meeting. Thankyou for your time and consideration ofthese comments. Please feel free to contactus with any questions. Respectfully, 

# ///;Z:_ Matthew G. Taylor GovernmentAviation WeatherManager

400 Minuteman Road • Andover, MA 01810 • Tel. 978.983.6300 • Fax. 978.983.6400 2 of 2

------- 

## ------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 356 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.356
                                          Agreed to May 23, 2002        

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
          the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SOAP BOX DERBY RACES ON CAPITOL GROUNDS.

    The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby Association (in this 
resolution referred to as the ``Association'') shall be permitted to 
sponsor a public event, soap box derby races, on the Capitol Grounds on 
June 22, 2002, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the 
Senate may jointly designate.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS.

    The event to be carried out under this resolution shall be free of 
admission charge to the public and arranged not to interfere with the 
needs of Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board; except that the 
Association shall assume full responsibility for all expenses and 
liabilities incident to all activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

    For the purposes of this resolution, the Association is authorized 
to erect upon the Capitol Grounds, subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, such stage, sound amplification devices, and 
other related structures and equipment as may be required for the event 
to be carried out under this resolution.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.

    The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board are 
authorized to make any such additional arrangements that may be 
required to carry out the event under this resolution.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946 (40 
U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, advertisements, displays, 
and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions 
applicable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event to be 
carried out under this resolution.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 377 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 377

  Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the establishment by the 
Hyundai Motor Company of its first automotive manufacturing facility in 
                           the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 16, 2002

  Mr. Riley (for himself, Mr. Aderholt, Mr. Bachus, Mr. Callahan, Mr. 
    Cramer, Mr. Everett, and Mr. Hilliard) submitted the following 
 concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 
                              and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the establishment by the 
Hyundai Motor Company of its first automotive manufacturing facility in 
                           the United States.

Whereas on April 1, 2002, the Hyundai Motor Company decided to locate an 
        automotive manufacturing facility in Montgomery, Alabama;
Whereas this automotive manufacturing plant will be Hyundai's first facility in 
        the United States;
Whereas the expected investment in the United States economy from the new 
        Montgomery Hyundai plant is more than $1,000,000,000;
Whereas Hyundai's Montgomery, Alabama, facility will employ an estimated 2,000 
        primary workers and create more than 4,000 additional jobs in related 
        industries; and
Whereas to date trade relations between the United States and the Republic of 
        Korea with respect to automotive manufacturing have resulted in an 
        approximate $6,000,000,000 deficit with Korea: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) commends the Hyundai Motor Company for its decision to 
        locate its first United States automotive manufacturing 
        facility in Montgomery, Alabama;
            (2) recognizes that the new facility in Montgomery, 
        Alabama, will result in the gainful employment of several 
        thousand Americans, as well as foster economic growth in the 
        surrounding area; and
            (3) recognizes that Hyundai's decision to locate this 
        facility in Alabama is a positive step in improving trade 
        relations between the United States and the Republic of Korea.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

Principal Executive and Financial Officer

I, Kevin Moe, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report ofAmeriprint International Ltd.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: January 24, 2005. | /s/ Kevin Moe                                              
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                        | Kevin Moe                                                  
|                        | Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

KELLY SYSTEMS, INC.,

Respondent

v.

LEONARD S. FIORE, INC.,

Respondent

v.

OGP ARCHITECTS, LLP,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 441 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, the 

Application to Strike, and the Application for Leave to File Reply is DENIED.
391 A.2d 672

#### Commonwealth v. Alexander, Appellant.

Submitted December 31,1977.

George A. Bachetti, for appellant; Eric B. Henson, Assistant District Attorney, and Edward G. Rendell, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.