Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 4, 2012 / Notices 20419 

orders were delivered to the President 

and to the United States Trade 

Representative on the day of their 

issuance. 

The Commission has terminated this 

investigation. The authority for the 

Commission’s determination is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 

1337), and in sections 210.16(c) and 

210.41 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.16(c) and 210.41). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 30, 2012. 

James R. Holbein, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2012–8045 Filed 4–3–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Clean Air Act 

Notice is hereby given that on March 

28, 2012, a proposed Consent Decree in 

United States v. Forward, Inc., Civil 

Action No. 2:11–cv–00590–EFB, was 

lodged with the United States District 

Court for the Eastern District of 

California. 

In this action the United States sought 

injunctive relief and civil penalties 

against defendant Forward, Inc., 

pursuant to Section 113(b) of the Clean 

Air Act (Act), 42 U.S.C. 7413(b), in 

connection with activities at the 

Forward Landfill in Manteca, California. 

The United States’ complaint, filed 

concurrently with the Consent Decree, 

alleges that Forward violated the Act by 

operating gas extraction wells in the 

landfill’s gas collection and control 

system (GCCS) in violation of the Act’s 

New Source Performance Standards and 

National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants, and in 

violation of the Title V permit it had 

received from the San Joaquin Valley 

Unified Air Pollution Control District 

(District), the United States’ co-plaintiff 

in the action. The Consent Decree 

would require Forward to improve the 

GCCS by installing new extraction wells 

and closing unneeded wells, to 

implement specific operations and 

maintenance actions to minimize air 

intrusion and the likelihood of 

subsurface fires at the landfill, to 

replace trucks in the landfill’s fleet with 

less polluting vehicles, and to pay a 

civil penalty of $200,000, to be shared 

with the District. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the Consent Decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, and either emailed to 

pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States v. Forward, Inc., No. 2:11–cv– 

00590–EFB (E.D. Cal.), D.J. Ref. 90–5–2– 

1–09873. 

During the public comment period, 

the Consent Decree, may also be 

examined on the following Department 

of Justice Web site, to http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

Consent Decree may also be obtained by 

mail from the Consent Decree Library, 

P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 

Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or 

by faxing or emailing a request to 

‘‘Consent Decree 

Copy’’(EESCDCopy.ENRD@usdoj.gov), 

fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–5271. If 

requesting a copy from the Consent 

Decree Library by mail, please enclose 

a check in the amount of $9.25 payable 

to the U.S. Treasury or, if requesting by 

email or fax, forward a check in that 

amount to the Consent Decree Library at 

the address given above. 

Henry S. Friedman, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2012–8033 Filed 4–3–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

United States v. Humana Inc. and 

Arcadian Management Services, Inc.; 

Proposed Final Judgment and 

Competitive Impact Statement 

Notice is hereby given pursuant to the 

Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 

15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), that a proposed 

Final Judgment, Stipulation, and 

Competitive Impact Statement have 

been filed with the United States 

District Court for the District of 

Columbia, in United States v. Humana 

Inc. and Arcadian Management 

Services, Inc., Civil Action No. 12-cv00464. On March 27, 2012, the United 

States filed a Complaint alleging that the 

proposed acquisition by Humana Inc. of 

Arcadian Management Services, Inc. 

would violate Section 7 of the Clayton 

Act, 15 U.S.C. 18. The proposed Final 

Judgment filed at the same time as the 

Complaint requires the parties to divest 

health plans in 51 counties and parishes 

in Arizona, Arkansas, Louisiana, 

Oklahoma, and Texas. 

Copies of the Complaint, proposed 

Final Judgment, and Competitive Impact 

Statement are available for inspection at 

the Department of Justice, Antitrust 

Division, Antitrust Documents Group, 

450 Fifth Street, NW., Suite 1010, 

Washington, DC 20530 (telephone: 202 

514–2481), and on the Department of 

Justice’s Web site at http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/atr, and at the Office of 

the Clerk of the United States District 

Court for the District of Columbia. 

Copies of these materials may be 

obtained from the Antitrust Division 

upon request and payment of the 

copying fee set by Department of Justice 

regulations. 

Public comment is invited within 60 

days of the date of this notice. Such 

comments and responses thereto will be 

published in the Federal Register and 

filed with the Court. Comments should 

be directed to Joshua H. Soven, Chief, 

Litigation I Section, Antitrust Division, 

U.S. Department of Justice, 450 Fifth 

Street NW., Suite 4100, Washington, DC 

20530 (telephone: 202–307–0827). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Director of Civil Enforcement. 

United States District Court for the 

District of Columbia 

United States of America, United States 

Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, 

Litigation I Section, 450 Fifth Street, NW., 

Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20530, Plaintiff, 

v. Humana Inc., 500 West Main Street, 

Louisville, KY 40202, and Arcadian 

Management Services, Inc., 500 12th Street, 

Suite 340, Oakland, CA 94607, Defendants. 

Case: 1:12-cv-00464. 

Assigned to: Walton, Reggie B. 

Assign. Date: 3/27/2012. 

Description: Antitrust. 

Complaint 

The United States of America 

(‘‘United States’’), acting under the 

direction of the Attorney General of the 

United States, brings this civil action to 

enjoin Humana Inc. (‘‘Humana’’) from 

acquiring Arcadian Management 

Services, Inc. (‘‘Arcadian’’). The United 

States alleges as follows: 

1. Unless enjoined, Humana’s 

proposed acquisition of Arcadian will 

substantially lessen competition in the 

sale of Medicare Advantage health 

insurance plans sold to Medicareeligible individuals (‘‘the relevant 

product market’’) in forty-five counties 

and parishes in Arizona, Arkansas, 

Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas (‘‘the 

relevant geographic markets’’). 

2. A Medicare Advantage plan is a 

health insurance product sold by a 


emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with NOTICES