alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than April 18, 2012.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:

                    1.                     *Giannoulias 2011 Checkspring Trust, Chicago, Illinois and Endy D. Zemenides, as trustee,*                     to acquire control of CheckSpring Community Corporation, and thereby indirectly acquire control of CheckSpring Bank, both of Bronx, New York.                

B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:

                    1.                     *Travis Carr, Andover, Kansas,*                     to retain shares and remain a member of the Carr Family Group, which controls Community State Bancshares, Inc., and thereby control Community Bank of Wichita, Inc., both in Wichita, Kansas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 30, 2012.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2012-8118 Filed 4-4-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130753 & (36) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF Robert P. Young, Jr. WEST BLOOMFIELD, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 130753 

 COA: 264500 

Oakland CC: 2003-053751-CE 

DUANE MONTGOMERY, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 1, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

consolidate is DENIED as moot. 

p0619 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2006 

Clerk
September 16, 2009

Mr. William C. Early (3RAOO)Acting Regional Administrator

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Region Ill

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029

Dear Mr. Early:

I am pleased to submit the enclosed State Implementation Plan for Meeting the

Infrastructure Requirements ofthe Clean Air Actfor Fine Particulate Matter. The purpose of

this SIP revision is to detail how Delaware meets all of the necessary implementation,maintenance, and enforcement measures required by Clean Air Act (“CAA”) Section 110(a) and

Section 110(a)(2) for the 2006 24-hour fine particulate (PM2.5)National Ambient Air Quality

Standards (NAAQS). The effective date of this SIP revision is September 1, 2009.

In this SIP revision Delaware addresses those requirements of Section 110(a) and Section

110 (a)(2) ofthe CAA which have not been specifically addressed in other SIP revisions. It is a

compilation of certain elements that describe how Delaware demonstrates that the 24-hour

NAAQS is being implemented, maintained and enforced. The elements of this SIP revision,

once approved by EPA, will provide a federally enforceable written confirmation of how

Delaware will continue to comply with the Section 1 l0(a)(2) requirements of the CAA. Many ofthe miscellaneous requirements of Section 1 10(a)(2)(A)-(M) ofthe CAA relevant to the 2006PM2.5NAAQS are already contained in Delaware’s SIP or in SIP revisions which have been

submitted to, but not yet approved by EPA.

This SIP revision met public hearing process requirements established by the State of

Delaware, and as required by EPA, with proper notification (30 days) prior to the convening of the

public hearing. The hearing was held on August 27, 2009. Attachments A and B are copies of

affidavits as proof of proper notification. It is the position ofthe State of Delaware that all

minimum requirements set forth in the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments have been met.

De€ataze 9&id ‘uaze deftetd4 o od
Sincere1v-,

Colhn P. 0 MaraSecretary

cc: Diane Esher, EPA w/encl.

Dave Arnold, EPA w/encl.Ali Mirzakhalili
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    Home





    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos

    Coronavirus Disease 2019





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    CSAF Reading List    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    2015 CSAF Reading List

    2014 CSAF Reading List

    2013 CSAF Reading List

    2012 CSAF Reading List

    2011 CSAF Reading List

    2010 CSAF Reading List

    2009 CSAF Reading List

    2008 CSAF Reading List

    2007 CSAF Reading List

    2006 CSAF Reading List

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Desert Storm 25th Anniversary

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2020

    Focus on Priorities





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (7.47 MB)
 
 Kenya USAirForce DeptofDefense USAF Partnership HQUSAFE AFAFRICA USAfricaCommand StateDept USDOS U.S. EmbassyNairobi AACSKenya Sgt. Craig Jensen AFN-Europe Africa Air Chiefs Symposium
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR Act
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (Nos. 333-20093, 333-62701, 333-45180, 333-68412, 333-82158, and 333-109135)
and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-11939, 333-62491, 333-11941, 333-45208, and
333-107314) of LifeCell Corporation of our report dated March 10, 2005 relating
to the financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.








/s/
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP





Florham
Park, NJ





March 10,
2005
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Donald B. GILL.

No. 86-K-1180.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 1, 1986.

In re Gill, Donald B.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, stay; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CR85-1052; Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 5311-85.

*19Prior report: La.App., 488 So.2d 765.

Stay order vacated. Writ denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.**I, Charles W. Hunter, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Xenonics Holdings, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small businessissuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the smallbusiness issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.        Date:  February 12, 2008 /s/ Charles W. Hunter   Name:  Charles W. Hunter   Title:  Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 247 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 247

Recognizing and honoring the service of the men and women who volunteer 
 their time to participate in funeral honor guards at the interment or 
 memorialization of deceased veterans of the uniformed services of the 
        United States at national cemeteries across the country.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 2001

 Mrs. Bono (for herself, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Rohrabacher, and Mr. Calvert) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing and honoring the service of the men and women who volunteer 
 their time to participate in funeral honor guards at the interment or 
 memorialization of deceased veterans of the uniformed services of the 
        United States at national cemeteries across the country.

Whereas it is important that the Nation provide proper respect and fitting 
        recognition to deceased veterans;
Whereas members of the uniformed services of the United States make significant 
        contributions to the general welfare of the United States;
Whereas the furnishing of an honor guard at the interment or memorialization of 
        a deceased veteran shows the proper respect to those who have passed 
        away after serving their country;
Whereas the family of a deceased veteran may request an honor guard service and 
        deserves the comfort of knowing that a respectful service will take 
        place; and
Whereas currently there are many demands placed on active duty units across the 
        country and there are not enough active duty honor guard units available 
        to perform these important services: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress hereby recognizes and honors the service of the men and 
women outside the active components of the Armed Forces who volunteer 
their time to participate in funeral honor guards at the interment or 
memorialization of deceased veterans of the uniformed services of the 
United States at national cemeteries across the country, as exemplified 
by the proud work that the members of the organization designated as 
Semper Fi #1 perform at Riverside National Cemetery, California.
                                 <all>
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROMESH KUMAR,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

Nos. 07-72628

 07-74951

Agency No. A075-545-598

MEMORANDUM*

On Petitions for Review of Orders of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Romesh Kumar, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) orders denying his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order and denying his motion to reopen. Our

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law

FILED

JUN 09 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-74951

and due process claims, and for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to

reopen. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny

in part and dismiss the petition in No. 07-72628, and deny the petition in No. 07-

74951. 

In No. 07-72628, Kumar has waived any challenge to the agency’s

conclusion that he is removable for overstaying his visa or that he failed to

demonstrate eligibility for relief from removal. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94

F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996). 

We lack jurisdiction over the denial of Kumar’s ex-wife’s Form I-130 visa

petition. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1) (granting jurisdiction to review final removal

orders). Kumar’s related due process claims fail because the IJ did not find Kumar

removable based on the marriage fraud charge. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241,

1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring prejudice for a petitioner to prevail on a due

process claim). 

 In No. 07-74951, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Kumar’s

motion to reopen on the ground that he failed to demonstrate prima facie eligibility

for adjustment of status. See Mendez-Gutierrez v. Gonzales, 444 F.3d 1168, 1171

(9th Cir. 2006) (petitioner demonstrates prima facie eligibility for relief where the

evidence reveals a reasonable likelihood that the statutory requirements for relief
3 07-74951

have been satisfied). Kumar’s contention that the BIA contradicted its holding in

Matter of Velarde-Pacheco, 23 I. & N. Dec. 253 (BIA 2002) is unavailing. 

In No. 07-72628: DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part. 

In No. 07-74951: DENIED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7163

ARNOLD CULBREATH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

TRAVIS MEDLOCK; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-95-55-2-18AJ)

Submitted: November 5, 1996 Decided: November 19, 1996

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arnold Culbreath, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Arnold Culbreath, a South Carolina inmate, filed an untimely

notice of appeal of the dismissal of his petition for relief under

28 U.S.C. § 2254. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time

periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App.

P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder

v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978)

(quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).

Parties to civil actions have thirty days within which to file in

the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final

orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on September 12, 1995;

Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on July 18, 1996. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain either an extension or a reopening of the appeal period leaves this court without

jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. We

therefore deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a),

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher R. Huber, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 23, 2006



/s/    CHRISTOPHER R.
HUBERChristopher R. Huber Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Operations (Principal Financial
Officer)