alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Ecolocap Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
here of (the "report"), I, Tri Vu Truong, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated this 14th day of
May, 2009








TRI VU
      TRUONGTri
      Vu TruongChief
      Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AARON RAISER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

DOUG LARGE,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 14

- 55835

D.C. No. 2:09

- cv

- 00254

- RGK

AGR

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 21, 2017 **

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Aa ron Raiser appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his

motion to amend his civil rights complaint to add claims of fraud, intentional

misrepresentation, and false promise, arising from his expulsion from Ventura

College of Law. We have juri sdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)( 2). 

# FILED

OCT 4 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 55835

abuse of discretion the district court’s decision to deny leave to amend. Chappel v.

Lab. Corp. of Am. , 232 F.3d 719, 725 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm.

Because Raiser cannot allege facts sufficient to establish promissory fraud as

against defendant Large, t he district court did not abuse its discretion in denying

Raiser’s motion to amend his complaint . Thus, his proposed amendments, each of

which sound in fraud, would have been futile. See id. at 725

- 26 (9th Cir. 2000)

(“A district court acts within its discretion to deny leave to amend when

amendment would be futile[.]”); see also Lazar v. Superior Court , 909 P.2d 981,

985 (Cal. 1996) (setting forth the elements of promissory fraud).

We lack jurisdic tion to consider the district court’s order denying Raiser’s

June 23, 2014 motion, which the district court construed as a motion for

reconsideration, because Raiser failed to file an amended or separate notice of

appeal. See Whitaker v. Garcetti , 486 F.3 d 572, 585 (9th Cir. 2007).

Raiser’s request to certify the questions at issue to the California Supreme

Court , set forth in his reply brief, is denied

.

AFFIRMED.
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 378

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending the District of Columbia National

Guard, the National Guard Bureau, and the entire Department of Defense for the assistanceprovided to the United States Capitol Police andthe entire Congressional community in responseto the terrorist and anthrax attacks of Septemberand October 2001.

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 378

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the terrorist and anthrax attacks of September and

October 2001 required Congress and the entire Congressional community to respond to a heightened state of

emergency;

Whereas the men and women of the United States Capitol

Police were required to shoulder the greatest burden of

this emergency response by working tremendously in-
2

•HCON 378 EH

creased hours under difficult conditions, requiring great

sacrifices by them and their families;

Whereas the District of Columbia National Guard responded

to the call of the Capitol Police Board and provided National Guard troops to assist the United States Capitol

Police in protecting the Capitol complex, providing great

relief to the members of the United States Capitol Police;

and

Whereas the combined efforts of the United States Capitol

Police and the District of Columbia National Guard have

made the Capitol complex secure for Members of Congress, Congressional employees, and visitors, and thereby

have enabled Congress to continue to discharge its constitutional duties on behalf of the American people: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress commends the District of Co3 lumbia National Guard, the National Guard Bureau, and

4 the entire Department of Defense for the assistance pro5 vided to the United States Capitol Police and the entire

6 Congressional community in response to the terrorist and

7 anthrax attacks of September and October 2001.

Passed the House of Representatives April 23, 2002.

Attest:

Clerk.
955 Jefferson Ave.

Valley Forge Corporate Center

Norristown, PA 19403-2497

April 19, 2013

Scott Baker

Sr. Business Solutions Analyst

Bakers1@pjm.com

(610) 666-2235

VIA EMAIL

U.S. Department of Energy

Email: expartecommunications@hq.doe.gov

RE: Ex Parte Communication, Docket EERE-2012-BT-STD-0022

To whom it may concern,

On April 19, 2013, representatives from PJM Interconnection LLC and the National 

Rural Electric Cooperatives Association held a phone call with members of the Department of 

Energy’s General Counsel and Building Technologies offices to discuss legal and procedural 

questions related to the docket referenced pertaining to residential electric storage water heaters. 

The purpose of this meeting was to gain clarity on the statutory authorities the 

Department was exercising to grant a waiver as proposed in the NOPR issued February 26, 2013 

(Federal Register, vol. 78, no. 38) and to further understand the basis for some of the stipulations 

enumerated in the NOPR. 

Sincerely,

/s/ Scott Baker

Attached below: List of attendees 

610.666.8980 | www.pjm.com
955 Jefferson Ave.

Valley Forge Corporate Center

Norristown, PA 19403-2497

Attendees:

Name Organization

Ari Altman Department of Energy

Ashley Armstrong Department of Energy

Scott Baker PJM Interconnection

Dan Cohen Department of Energy

John Cymbalsky Department of Energy

Craig Glazer PJM Interconnection

Jay Morrison NRECA

 

610.666.8980 | www.pjm.com
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

Ron. J. B. Keith, Chainnaz~ Board of Pardons & &roles **Austin,** Texas 

### Dear **sir:**

**By ymlr** **18tt8r**

**or .0r**  

### thla Deparhutnt upon t

"Ray the Bmrd and .th8oovernor 88ntenao or 8onrl88d in

(80 Etuliag Case Law 51501 B%ddle ~'8.Perotiich, El4 U. S. 4801. Trusting that this will 8atisfaOtorlly answer your Inquiry, w&al-8 Your8 very truly
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7997]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self-
Employed Decreasing Non-Filers Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/
Self-Employed Decreasing Non-Filers Project Committee will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday April 26 and Friday, April 27, 
2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 
414-231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/
Self-Employed Decreasing Non-Filers Project Committee will be held 
Thursday, April 26 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. and Friday, April 27 from 8 
a.m. to Noon Central Time at 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 
53203-2221. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Notification of intent to 
participate must be made with Ms. Patricia Robb. For more information 
please contact Ms. Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP 
Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-
2221, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: March 27, 2012.
Louis Morizio,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2012-7997 Filed 4-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### BOWMAN CORPORATION v. BAMA BUSINESS MACHINES.

Civ. 5665.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

Feb. 25, 1987.

S.D. Bowman, pro se.

*316Ellen Turner, pro se.

EDWARD N. SCRUGGS, Retired Circuit Judge.

This is a breach of contract-account case.

Both parties recite many facts in their respective briefs which do not appear in the record. We cannot consider factual matters outside of the record. The briefs of parties cannot enlarge, change, alter, or vary the record which must itself disclose the facts relied upon. *Sellers v. Sellers,*497 So.2d 174 (Ala.Civ.App.1986). Consequently, we must consider only pertinent facts which the record reveals.

Bama Business Machines sued Bowman Corporation in the small claims court where a judgment was rendered against the defendant in the amount of $657.85. The defendant timely appealed to the circuit court. A final judgment was rendered and entered by the circuit court that, the case being “called and the defendant having received notice of the trial setting and failing to appear, the appeal is hereby dismissed.” The defendant duly appealed therefrom and, in addition to those factual matters which we cannot consider, argues, in substance, that the circuit court abused its discretion in entering the final dismissal judgment.

A dismissal because of a party’s failure to appear at a trial is a matter which falls within the trial court’s discretion and will not be reversed upon an appeal except for an abuse thereof. *Thompson v. McQuagge,*464 So.2d 105 (Ala.Civ.App.1985). The only facts, relative to the dismissal, which we have before us are those which were set forth by the circuit court in its final judgment. The record does not disclose any abusive use of that discretionary power in this case. The recitals in the judgment sustain its issuance. The final judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by Retired Circuit Judge EDWARD N. SCRUGGS while serving on active duty status as a judge of this court under the provisions of § 12-18-10(e), Code 1975, and this opinion is hereby adopted as that of the court.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 2 - 0 107 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. SHANE THOMPSON FREIBURG ,

Defendant and Appellant,

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s unopposed motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 24 , 202 3 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 19 2023

04/19/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0107
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00100

- CV

In the Matter of P.E.J. §

§

§

§ From County Court at Law No. 1

o f Wichita County (37639

- LR

- D )

August 15 , 2013

P er C uriam



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment s . It is ordered that the judgment s

of the trial court are affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPE ALS

PER CURIAM
H. Con. Res. 149 Agreed to June 6, 2001

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used

on June 7, 2001, for a ceremony to present posthumously a gold

medal on behalf of Congress to Charles M. Schulz. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with

such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
## cc: Lamalsikou Lowe Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A cOti415> 

## 2

:41
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 2, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________________

No. 01-41019

__________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE VEGA III, Defendant-Appellant.

___________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

___________________________________________________

On Petition for Rehearing Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:
IT IS ORDERED that this court, on its own motion, hereby grants panel rehearing of the decision heretofore file d on March 17, 2003; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that said opinion, published as United States v. Vega , 324 F.3d 798 (5th Cir. 2003), is hereby withdrawn; and
IT IS FURTHE R ORDERED that, in replacement of the aforesaid withdr awn decision, the attached substitute opinion be filed2

forthwith.
SCWC-18-0000583 

________________________________________________________________ 

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, 

vs.

JAMES BOONSTRA, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant

and

ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF THE VINTAGE AT KAANAPALI; 

KAANAPALI GOLF ESTATES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.; FIRST 

HAWAIIAN BANK; THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA THE BANK OF NEW 

YORK, AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. AS 

TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF CWABS MASTER TRUST, 

REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN ASSET BACKED NOTES, SERIES 2004-Q,

Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

________________________________________________________________ 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS 

(CAAP-18-0000583; CIVIL NO. 15-1-0093(2))

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant James Boonstra’s application 

for writ of certiorari filed on September 9, 2019, is hereby 

rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, November 5, 2019. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

SCWC-18-0000583

05-NOV-2019

12:18 PM
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laycor Ventures Corp.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period end September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Robert Wayne Morgan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14th day of November, 2006.



| | ROBERT WAYNE MORGAN                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Robert Wayne Morgan                                
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



















---
IRIS+ 22.8 18 0

DJI DJI 19.0 17 216

Hubsan 1.0 1 20

TOTALS: 42.8 36

6/11/2013 DJI Self Parking Lot Local Flight

6/13/2013 DJI Self Parking Lot Local Flight

7/3/2013 DJI Self Parking Lot Local Flight

7/4/2013 DJI Self Parking Lot Local Flight

8/15/2013 DJI Self Parking Lot Local Flight

8/17/2013 DJI Self Parking Lot Local Flight

8/29/2013 DJI Self Parking Lot Local Flight

9/15/2013 DJI Self Parking Lot Local Flight

9/28/2013 DJI Self Parking Lot Local Flight

9/29/2013 DJI Self Cemetary Local Flight

11/16/2013 DJI Self Cemetary Local Flight

11/17/2013 DJI Self AMA Field Local Flight

11/30/2013 DJI Self Field Local Flight

12/14/2013 DJI Self Field Local Flight

12/15/2013 DJI Self Field Local Flight

12/28/2013 DJI Self Cemetary Local Flight

12/29/2013 DJI Self Cemetary Local Flight

1/11/2014 DJI Self Park Local Flight

19-Jan-14 DJI Self Park Local Flight

Hunsan

AIRCRAFT TYPES TOTAL 

HOURS

No. OF FLIGHTS DAYS SINCE LAST 

FLIGHT

DATE

TYPE

RC OPERATOR LOG BOOK FOR DOUGLAS DORRER

3D Robotics

REG.

PILOT IN 

COMMAND

CO-PILOT or 

STUDENT

ROUTE DETAILS

AIRCRAFT CREW FLIGHT
30-Jan-14 DJI Self Parking Lot Local Flight

8-Feb-14 DJI Self Baseball field Local Flight

9-Feb-14 DJI Self park Local Flight

28-Feb-14 DJI Self park Local Flight

15-Mar-14 DJI Self Parking Lot Local Flight

16-Mar-14 DJI Self Parking Lot Local Flight

23-Mar-14 DJI Self park Local Flight

30-Mar-14 DJI Self field Local Flight

19-Apr-14 DJI Self field Local Flight

20-Apr-14 DJI Self field Local Flight

7-Jun-14 DJI Self Baseball field Local Flight

8-Jun-14 DJI Self Parking Lot Local Flight

14-Jun-14 DJI Self AMA Field Local Flight

15-Jun-14 DJI Self AMA Field Local Flight

21-Jun-14 DJI Self AMA Field Local Flight

22-Jun-14 DJI Self Parking Lot Local Flight

1-Dec-14 IRIS+ Self Cemetary Local flight

3-Dec-14 IRIS+ Self AMA Airfield Local flight

4-Dec-14 IRIS+ Self Open Field Local flight

7-Dec-14 IRIS+ Self Open Field Local flight

13-Dec-14 IRIS+ Self Park Local flight

14-Dec-14 IRIS+ Self Cemetary Local flight

16-Dec-14 IRIS+ Self Cemetary Local flight

20-Dec-14 IRIS+ Self Park Local flight

21-Dec-14 IRIS+ Self Park Local flight

27-Dec-14 IRIS+ Self Cemetary Local flight

28-Dec-14 IRIS+ Self Cemetary Local flight

1-Jan-15 IRIS+ Self AMA Airfield Local flight

3-Jan-15 IRIS+ Self Cemetary Local flight

4-Jan-15 Hubsan Self Indoors Local flight

10-Jan-15 IRIS+ Self Park Local flight

11-Jan-15 IRIS+ Self AMA Airfield Local flight

17-Jan-15 IRIS+ Self Field Local flight

18-Jan-15 IRIS+ Self Field Local flight

24-Jan-15 IRIS+ Self FIELD Local Flight
# Jornal Oficial C 123A/16 d

| | ISSN 1977-1010 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 123A |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 63.° ano16 de abril de 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1010

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 123A

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

63.° ano16 de abril de 2020

---

| Índice | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | Retificações |
| 2020/C 123 A/01 | Retificação do anúncio de concursos gerais — EPSO/AD/375/20 — Juristas-linguistas (AD 7) de língua dinamarquesa (DA) — EPSO/AD/376/20 — Juristas–linguistas (AD 7) de língua grega (EL) — EPSO/AD/377/20 — Juristas-linguistas (AD 7) de língua francesa (FR) — EPSO/AD/378/20 — Juristas-linguistas (AD 7) de língua croata (HR) — EPSO/AD/379/20 — Juristas–linguistas (AD 7) de língua polaca (PL) ( JO C 72 A de 5.3.2020 ) | 1 |

Índice

Página

Retificações

2020/C 123 A/01

Retificação do anúncio de concursos gerais — EPSO/AD/375/20 — Juristas-linguistas (AD 7) de língua dinamarquesa (DA) — EPSO/AD/376/20 — Juristas–linguistas (AD 7) de língua grega (EL) — EPSO/AD/377/20 — Juristas-linguistas (AD 7) de língua francesa (FR) — EPSO/AD/378/20 — Juristas-linguistas (AD 7) de língua croata (HR) — EPSO/AD/379/20 — Juristas–linguistas (AD 7) de língua polaca (PL) ( JO C 72 A de 5.3.2020 )

( JO C 72 A de 5.3.2020 )

1

---

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

Retificações

| 16.4.2020 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | CA 123/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2020

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

CA 123/1

---

Retificação do anúncio de concursos gerais — EPSO/AD/375/20 — Juristas-linguistas (AD 7) de língua dinamarquesa (DA) — EPSO/AD/376/20 — Juristas–linguistas (AD 7) de língua grega (EL) — EPSO/AD/377/20 — Juristas-linguistas (AD 7) de língua francesa (FR) — EPSO/AD/378/20 — Juristas-linguistas (AD 7) de língua croata (HR) — EPSO/AD/379/20 — Juristas–linguistas (AD 7) de língua polaca (PL)

(
  «Jornal Oficial da União Europeia» C 72 A de 5 de março de 2020
  )

(2020/C 123 A/01)

Na página 1:

onde se lê:

«Data-limite de inscrição: 7 de abril de 2020, às 12 horas (meio-dia), hora de Bruxelas»,

deve ler-se:

deve ler-se:

«Data-limite de inscrição: 5 de maio de 2020, às 12 horas (meio-dia), hora de Bruxelas»,

Na página 6:

onde se lê:

onde se lê:

«As candidaturas devem ser apresentadas em linha no sítio do EPSO http://jobs.eu-careers.eu até:

7 de abril de 2020, às 12 horas (meio-dia), hora de Bruxelas»,

deve ler-se:

deve ler-se:

«As candidaturas devem ser apresentadas em linha no sítio do EPSO http://jobs.eu-careers.eu até:

5 de maio de 2020, às 12 horas (meio-dia), hora de Bruxelas».

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2291

RODERICK A. CARTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CPC LOGISTICS, INC.; CPC MEDICAL PRODUCTS, LLC; HOSPIRA 

FLEET SERVICES, LLC,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior

District Judge. (3:12-cv-03637-MBS)

Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roderick A. Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher John Near, 

OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Columbia, South 

Carolina; Danny Michael Henthorne, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, 

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Roderick A. Carter appeals the district court’s order 

granting summary judgment to the defendants on Carter’s 

retaliation claim filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil 

Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Carter v. CPC Logistics, 

Inc., No. 3:12-cv-03637-MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED