alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1

                       PAYMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND RELEASE

      This Payment Acknowledgment and Release ("Acknowledgment") is made as of
June 8 , 2005 Agreement by and among Kiwa Bio-Tech Products Group Corporation, a
Delaware corporation ("Borrower") on the one hand and Young San Kim and Song N.
Bang (jointly, "Lender") on the other hand.

                                    RECITALS

      A. Borrower and Lender entered into a Convertible Loan Agreement dated
September 23, 2004 (the "Loan").

      B. The Loan provided that the principal amount borrowed, $350,000, was to
be paid to Lender on or before March 23, 2005, the maturity date.

      C. Borrower did not pay the principal amount of the Loan when due.

      D. Borrower and Lender agreed to amend the Loan pursuant to an
Agreement Amending Covertible Loan ("Amendment") between the parties made as of
April 7, 2005.

                                 ACKNOWLEDGMENT

      1. Acknowledgment. Lender acknowledges that the interest payment of
$17,500 and the 1,050,000 warrants referred to in Paragraph 3 of the Loan were
delivered to Lender in accordance with the terms of the Loan. Lender
acknowledges payment by Borrower of $350,000 for principal and of $9,991 for
penalty interest to the lender as of June 3, 2005, which Lender acknowledges
constitutes full satisfaction of all payment and performance obligations of
Borrower under the Loan and the Amendment. Lender hereby releases Borrower from
all obligations under the Loan or the Amendment.

      2. Governing Law. This Acknowledgment is governed by, construed and
enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware without regard to
conflict of law principles.

      3. Consent to Jurisdiction. The parties irrevocably consent to the
jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in Los Angelas County,
California for all purposes in connection with any action or proceeding which
arises out of or relates to this Agreement.

      4. Amendment. No amendment, modification, termination or cancellation of
this Acknowledgment is effective unless made in a writing signed by each of the
parties.

                                    KIWA BIO-TECH PRODUCTS GROUP CORPORATION

                                    By:     /s/ Wei Li
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                    Name:   Wei Li
                                    Title:  Chairman of Board of Directors
                                            and Chief Executive Officer

                                            /s/ Young San Kim
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                            Young San Kim

                                            /s/ Song N. Bang
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                            Song N. Bang
Lisa Bonnett 

Director 

Sincerely,

��

ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

1021 NORTH GRAND AVENUE EAsr, p .0. Box 19276, SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS 62794-9276 • (217)782-2829 

PAT QUINN, GOVERNOR LISA BONNETT, DIRECTOR 

March 18, 2014 

Dr. Susan Hedman 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA, Region 5 

77 West Jackson Boulevard 

Mail CodeRA-19J 

Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590 

Re: Old American Zinc Site 

Fairmont City/St. Clair County 

Dear Dr. Hedman:

The State of Illinois supports the preparation ofa formal scoring package and the addition of the

Old American Zinc Site to the National Priorities List.

The State ofillinois' evaluation of the Old American Zinc site, located in Fairmont City, shows

that past disposal practices on this property have resulted in uncontrolled releases of hazardous

substances that pose unacceptable risks to human health and the environment.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please feel free to contact Mr. Kurt 

Neibergall, Acting Chief; Bureau of Land at 217/785-3819 or kurt.neibergall@illinois.gov. 

4302 N. JJ.cin St., Rockford, ll 61103 (815) 987-7760 

595 S. Sto1e, Elgin, IL 60123 (847) 608-31 31 

2125 S. First St., 01ompoign, IL 61820 (217) 278-5800 

2009 /Aoll St., Co!!insville, !L 6223.:1 (618) 346-5120 

9511 Harrison St., Des Plaines, ll 60016 (847) 294-4000 

5407 N. University St., Arbor 113, Peoria, ll 61614 (309) 693-5462 

2309 W. Main St., Suite 1 16, Morion, !L 62959 (618) 993-7200 

100 W. Rand':>lph, Suite l 0-300, Chicago, ll 6060 I {312) 814-6026 

PLEASE PRINT ON RECYaED? APER
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Neutral Tandem, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, to the best knowledge and
belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Rian Wren           |  |  |  | /s/ Robert Junkroski   
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date: August 7, 2009    |  |  |  | Date: August 7, 2009   

The certification set forth above is being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the certifying officers.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos

    Coronavirus Disease 2019

    Air Force Art Collection





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2021

    Focus on Priorities

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    CSAF Leadership Library    
        CSAF Leadership Library Bookshelf

    2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers





    Contact Us  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (0.11 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR ActOSI Tip Line
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 23

- 00414

- CV

In re Dry Utilities, LLC and Steven W. Hooge

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T ex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

R e lators ’ emergency motion for temporary relief is also denied.

_______________________ ___________________ Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Theo fanis

Filed: July 28 , 2023
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 331 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 331

Commending the Secretary of Transportation and the Nation's air traffic 
 controllers for their actions to avert further tragedy following the 
                terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2002

  Mrs. Bono submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Commending the Secretary of Transportation and the Nation's air traffic 
 controllers for their actions to avert further tragedy following the 
                terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.

Whereas following the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, the Secretary of 
        Transportation acted quickly and decisively in directing the Nation's 
        air traffic controllers to land and account for all aircraft in United 
        States airspace;
Whereas in response to this directive, the Nation's air traffic controllers 
        acted in a calm and professional manner in securing all of the aircraft; 
        and
Whereas the actions of the Nation's air traffic controllers may well have 
        averted further tragedy following the terrorist attacks: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress commends the Secretary of Transportation for his quick 
and decisive actions following the terrorist attacks on September 11, 
2001, and the Nation's air traffic controllers for their heroic actions 
on that day to avert further tragedy.
                                 <all>
```
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 238

Expressing the sense of Congress that States should require candidates for

driver’s licenses to demonstrate an ability to exercise greatly increased

caution when driving in the proximity of potentially visually impaired

individuals.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 2, 2001

Mr. EVANS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that States should require

candidates for driver’s licenses to demonstrate an ability

to exercise greatly increased caution when driving in

the proximity of potentially visually impaired individuals.

Whereas many people in the United States who are blind or

otherwise visually impaired have the ability to travel

throughout their communities without assistance;

Whereas visually impaired individuals encounter hazards that

a pedestrian with average vision could easily avoid, many

of which involve crossing streets and roadways;

Whereas the white cane is recognized as a nontechnical aid

to mobility for visually impaired individuals;
2

•HCON 238 IH

Whereas many States do not require candidates for driver’s

licenses to recognize the white cane or associate the use

of a white cane with potentially visually impaired individuals; and

Whereas visually impaired individuals have reported incidents

of having their white canes run over by vehicles, having

been struck by the side-view mirror of vehicles, and worse

encounters: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that each

3 State should require any candidate for a driver’s license

4 in such State to demonstrate, as a condition of obtaining

5 a driver’s license, an ability to recognize a white cane, as6 sociate the use of a white cane with a visually impaired

7 individual, and exercise greatly increased caution when

8 driving in proximity to a potentially visually impaired indi9 vidual.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 3, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7984]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Howard Hughes Medical Institute, et al.; Notice of Consolidated 
Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscope

    This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 
(Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR 
part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. 
in Room 3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue 
NW., Washington, DC.
    Docket Number: 11-074. Applicant: Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 
Chevy Chase, MD 20815. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: 
FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 77 FR 12240, 
February 29, 2012.
    Docket Number: 12-002. Applicant: National Center for Toxicological 
Research, Jefferson, AR 72079. Instrument: Electron Microscope. 
Manufacturer: JEOL Instruments, Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 77 
FR 12240, February 29, 2012.
    Docket Number: 12-004. Applicant: Max Planck Florida Institute, 
Jupiter, FL 33458. Instrument: Freeze Fracture/Freeze Etch device. 
Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 77 FR 
12240, February 29, 2012.
    Docket Number: 12-005. Applicant: VA Palo Alto Health Care System, 
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1207. Instrument: Electron Microscope. 
Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 
77 FR 12240, February 29, 2012.
    Docket Number: 12-006. Applicant: William Patterson University, 
Wayne, NJ 07470. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: Hitachi 
High Technologies America, Inc., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 77 
FR 12240, February 29, 2012.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as this instrument is intended to be used, is being 
manufactured in the United States at the time the instrument was 
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an electron microscope and 
is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring an 
electron microscope. We know of no electron microscope, or any other 
instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in 
the United States at the time of order of each instrument.

    Dated: March 26, 2012.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-7984 Filed 4-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
z z 

### U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Public Notice Rogers Road Municipal Landfill Superfund Site
August 7, 2009 z z

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) signed the Explanation of Significant Differences for the Rogers Road Municipal Landfill Superfund Site near Jacksonville in Pulaski County, Arkansas on August 7, 2009. The Explanation of Significant Differences is being issued to document that groundwater monitoring stopped in 1997 after four years of monitoring becau se no contaminants of concern were detected in the ground water during the four years of monitori ng. The contaminated soil on site, along with drums and other wastes were excavated and any soils and other wastes above

risk values were incinera ted. The remedy selectedfor the Rogers Road Landfill Site included excavation of the on-site waste material, thermal treatment and ash disposal of this material at the Vertac Chemical Corp., capping of residual waste onsite,long term groundwater monitoring and site maintenance. Wastes at the Rogers Road Landfill Site below the risk values were capped with clean soil. The remedy included long-term ground watermonitoring and site maintenance. That these actions have been implemented was recorded in the Third Five Year Review completed in 2005. Cleanup values were established for areas identified for cleanup during th e remedial action. No other significant differences exist between the final remedial action and the selected remedy presented in the September 1990 Record of Decision.

The Administrative Record and Five-Year Review Reports are available at the following locations:

Jacksonville City Hall 1 Municipal Drive Jacksonville, AR 72078

501.982.3181

Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality

5301 Northshore Drive North Little Rock, AR 72118

501.682.0744

Questions concerning the Rogers Road Landfill Site should be directed to Shawn Ghose, M.S.,P.E., ASME, Remedial Project Manager, at 214.665.6782; or 1.800.533.3508 (toll-free).

For press inquiries, please call the EPA Press Office at

214.665.2208.
#### Steven FREDERICK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 88-955.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 22, 1988.

DeFabio & Lapidus, and Joel DeFabio, Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Giselle D. Lylen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

Before HUBBART, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Castor v. State,*365 So.2d 701 (Fla.1978).
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonathan David SMITH, Defendant, and concerning Michael Gray, Surety-Appellant.

No. 80CA0533.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

April 22, 1982.

*865J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Hennessey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Mary J. Mullareky, Sol. Gen., Clement P. Engle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-ap-pellee.

Steven R. Newell, Littleton, for surety-appellant.

TURSI, Judge.

Surety, Michael Gray, as an agent of a corporate surety company, appeals the trial court order forfeiting his bond posted to secure bail for defendant. We reverse.

The surety secured a $400 bail bond for a misdemeanor charge of driving under the influence pending against defendant in Douglas County Court. Defendant was present at the next appearance date when, as a result of the same criminal episode, he was informed that an additional charge of driving after judgment prohibited, a felony, which carries a mandatory prison sentence, was being filed. The county court then set bond for these two offenses at $1000, and stated that it was applying the $400 bond on the driving under the influence charge to the new charge. Defendant obtained an additional $600 bond from a a party not involved in this appeal. The surety was not advised of the new charge or of the application of the bond to the new charge.

Both charges were subsequently transferred to Douglas County District Court. When defendant failed to appear, both sureties’ bonds were forfeited following the issuance of show cause citations and hearing thereon.

The surety argues that the trial court erred in forfeiting his bond because the application of the original bond for the driving under the influence charge to the felony charge without his consent materially increased the risk involved in the bond. We agree.

When one undertakes a surety obligation, the surety undertakes a calculated risk, and events which materially increase that risk without consent of the surety terminate the obligation of the bond. *Rodriquez v. People,*191 Colo. 540, 554 P.2d 291 (1976); *People v. Calloway,*40 Colo.App. 543, 577 P.2d 1109 (1978); *Restatement of Security*§ 128(b) (1941).

Here, the surety entered into a contractual obligation to ensure defendant’s appearance on a misdemeanor charge. Later, without his knowledge or consent, his obligations were expanded to make him additionally responsible for defendant’s appearance on the felony charge. The application of the bond to the felony charge materially increased the risk that the surety had agreed to undertake. The non-appearance of defendant became more likely when defendant faced a mandatory prison sentence. Thus, the trial court erred in ordering the surety’s bond forfeited. *Rodriquez v. People, supra.*The bond should have *866been released when the driving under the influence case was transferred to the district court and combined with a felony charge.

The order is reversed and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this decision.

COYTE and VAN CISE, JJ., concur.
#### STATE ex rel. James E. ROLLINS, Jr. v. Frank C. BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 86-KH-2087.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1987.

In re Rollins, James E. Jr.; applying for writ of habeas corpus, certiorari, prohibition and mandamus; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 19603.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Roland FRANCIS v. Hon. Matthew S. BRANIFF.

No. 86-KH-2071.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 19, 1987.

In re Francis, Roland; applying for writ of habeas corpus; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 297-927.

Denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hawk Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period endingDecember 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Ronald E. Weinberg, Chairman of the Board, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company./s/ RONALD E. WEINBERG Ronald E. Weinberg*Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer andPresident*March 30, 2005     This certification is made solely for the purpose of18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the knowledgestandard contained in that statute, and not for any otherpurpose.
78