alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 395 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 395

      Celebrating the 50th anniversary of the constitution of the 
                      Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 2, 2002

 Mr. Acevedo-Vila (for himself, Mr. Hansen, and Mr. Rahall) submitted 
    the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
      Celebrating the 50th anniversary of the constitution of the 
                      Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

Whereas on July 3, 1952, the President signed Public Law 82-447 (66 Stat. 327), 
        approving the constitution of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico;
Whereas on July 10, 1952, the Constitutional Convention of Puerto Rico 
        reconvened and approved the conditions established by Public Law 82-447;
Whereas on July 25, 1952, Governor Luis Munoz Marin proclaimed that the 
        constitution was in effect;
Whereas the United States citizens of Puerto Rico have proudly fulfilled their 
        duties to this great Nation, and some have made the ultimate sacrifice 
        in defense of democracy, freedom, and the United States Constitution 
        since World War I; and
Whereas the cultural diversity of the United States has been enriched by the 
        people of Puerto Rico who have preserved and promoted their culture, 
        language, and identity: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress celebrates the 50th anniversary of the constitution 
of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
                                 <all>
```
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 341

Expressing the sense of Congress that Federal funding of the Peace Corps

should be doubled to $550,000,000 by 2007, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 2002

Ms. MCCOLLUM (for herself, Mr. FARR of California, Mr. WALSH, Mr. PETRI,

Mr. NADLER, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. HONDA, Mr. HALL of Ohio, and Mr. FORD) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that Federal funding of

the Peace Corps should be doubled to $550,000,000 by

2007, and for other purposes.

Whereas, since 1961, more than 165,000 volunteers have

served in the Peace Corps in 134 countries in Africa,

Asia and the Pacific, Central Asia, Eastern and Central

Europe, and Central and South America;

Whereas the President has put forward a national call to

service and plans to increase the number of Peace Corps

volunteers to almost 15,000 over the next 5 years;

Whereas visits to the Peace Corps internet web site and requests for applications increased 300 percent since the
2

•HCON 341 IH

President’s call to service during his report on the State

of the Union in January 2002;

Whereas Peace Corps volunteers provide an invaluable service

to the Nation by responding to the real global crises of

hunger, poverty, HIV and AIDS, maternal and child

health, lack of education, and development challenges and

have improved the lives of individuals and communities

throughout the world;

Whereas the Peace Corps has enriched and strengthened the

Nation by promoting international peace, cross-cultural

awareness, and mutual understanding between the

United States and the world; and

Whereas the spirit of service and commitment to helping others is a fundamental component of democracy: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring) That the Congress—

3 (1) recognizes the President’s call to double the

4 number of Peace Corps volunteers to almost 15,000

5 in 5 years as an opportunity to improve under6 standing between the people of the United States

7 and the world; and

8 (2) recognizes the need to double funding for

9 the Peace Corps to $550,000,000 by 2007.

Æ
#### Randolph W. WRIGHT, Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. Cindy A.L. WRIGHT, Appellee/Cross Appellant.

No. 4-86-0738.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 14, 1987.

Michael L. Cohen of Michael L. Cohen, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant/cross appellee.

No brief filed by appellee/cross appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We find no abuse of discretion in the final judgment entered in this dissolution proceeding. *See Canakaris v. Canakaris,*382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). *Also see Munger v. Munger,*249 So.2d 772 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971) and *McClay v. McClay,*447 So.2d 1026 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). We dismiss appellee’s cross appeal for failure to file a brief.

DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., dissents in part with opinion.

ANSTEAD, Judge,

dissenting in part.

Although the husband has raised numerous issues on appeal, I agree with the majority that we should sustain the trial court’s rulings in all respects except for the award of permanent alimony in the amount of $1.00 per year. This is not a marriage of long duration involving a spouse who cannot work. The record reflects that the wife is only 27 years of age .and in good health. At the time of the final hearing the parties were in roughly similar financial circumstances, although there is proof that the husband has a greater earning capacity. By virtue of the child support awards to the wife, her income will actually exceed that of the husband. In my view this case belongs at the opposite end of the spectrum from those “classic” cases meriting permanent alimony. Those cases typically involve older spouses, substantial disparities in financial circumstances and long-term marriages. In my view, absent unusual circumstances, the law should be reluctant to burden young healthy adults with an obligation for permanent support of other young healthy adults outside of an existing marriage relationship.
Exhibit 31.1


Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification





I, James Darrell Thomas, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2021-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A.





/s/ James Darrell ThomasJames Darrell ThomasVice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) of Harley-Davidson Credit Corp., Servicer to Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2021-BMarch 24, 2022
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSB Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Robert J. Halloran, Jr., President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 14, 2007



/s/    ROBERT J. HALLORAN,
JR.Robert J. Halloran, Jr.President and Treasurer
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 25, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Tanner,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that :

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
|                    |
|-------------------------|
|                         |
| /s/ Steven Tanner       |   |
| Steven Tanner           |
|                    |
| Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |
| August 04, 2006         |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of BLACKWATER MIDSTREAM CORP. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael D. Suder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



August 19, 2008



By:       /s/  Michael D. Suder
         -----------------------------------
         Michael D. Suder
         Chief Executive Officer
#### John William LANDERS v. STATE.

8 Div. 323.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Oct. 28, 1986.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 30, 1986.

Certiorari Denied March 27, 1987 Alabama Supreme Court 86-468.

*335Jerry Knight of Hardwick, Knight & Haddock, Decatur, for appellant.

Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Jane LeCroy Brannan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

TAYLOR, Judge.

Appellant, John William Landers, was indicted by the Morgan County Grand Jury for the possession of marijuana. He was subsequently found guilty, and was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of eight years, and was fined $25,000. From this judgment and sentence, Landers now appeals.

The evidence indicates that appellant had, on some occasions, stayed at the residence of Joel Brent Calhoun, which was the subject of a search on August 7, 1981. Luggage with appellant’s initials on it, as well as some papers concerning the purchase of a car by appellant, were found in one bedroom of the house. While none of the marijuana found in the residence was found in that bedroom, testimony was given by two witnesses that they had purchased marijuana from appellant at the house.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in allowing into evidence the product of searches conducted on vehicles owned by Joel Calhoun which were found on the premises. Appellant arrived at the Calhoun residence after officers had arrived and were carrying out the search warrant. He was driving a Chevrolet Corvette, a subsequent search of which revealed no marijuana.

Investigator Tom Little was allowed, over the timely objection of appellant, to testify as to the product of his search of Joel Calhoun’s vehicles. In these vehicles, Little testified that he discovered some 64 pounds of marijuana, 1010 quaalude tablets, and three ounces of cocaine.

The state, citing *Smith v. State,*393 So.2d 529 (Ala.Cr.App.1981), contends that the evidence of crimes committed by Calhoun was relevant to issues presented in the trial of appellant for the offense of possession of marijuana. We do not find that *Smith, supra*is applicable to the instant case. In the absence of any evidence tending to show ownership, control, or occupancy of these vehicles by appellant, we find that it was error to admit into evidence the various products of their search. See *Van Nostrand v. State,*51 Ala.App. 494, 286 So.2d 903 (1973); *DeGruy v. State,*56 Ala.App. 521, 323 So.2d 406 (1975).

An examination of the other issues raised by appellant reveals that they have no merit, and that they need not be addressed here, as they will have no bearing upon a retrial. For the foregoing reason, we find that this case is due to be reversed and remanded for new trial.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the Judges concur.
exv10w29



 






	 	 	 	 	 



EXHIBIT 10.29




June 28, 2005




John Moore

2417 Portage Road

Silver Spring, MD 20906



Dear John:





     We are very pleased that you have agreed to serve as a member of the Board of Directors of
GlobalSecure Holdings, Ltd. and to serve as the Chairman of our Compensation Committee. As we’ve
discussed, Global Secure is focused on securing the homeland with integrated products and services
for the critical incident response community worldwide. Global Secure is made up of three business
units – Global Secure Systems, Global Secure Training and Global Secure Safety, each working to
provide a comprehensive solution to our customers incorporating information and communications
technologies, training and exercise programs, and protective equipment.



     As a member of our Board of Directors you will receive a compensation package consisting of
the following: 1) upon joining the Board of Directors, you will receive a grant of options to
purchase 150,000 shares of common stock of the Company that would vest in equal annual tranches
over 3 years dependent upon your continued service as a director and subject to the terms and
conditions of our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan and the governing Stock Option Agreement, 2) upon
joining the Board of Directors and on each anniversary of service thereafter, you will receive a
$20,000 annual fee, and 3) you will also receive a fee of $2,500 for attendance at each meeting of
the Board of Directors and separate meeting of the Audit Committee if not held on the same day as a
meeting of the full Board of Directors.



     Global Secure is pleased to welcome you.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,

 	 
	 	/s/ Craig R. Bandes
 	 
	 	Craig R. Bandes 	 
	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Amerisa Kornblum, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Odimo Incorporated;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: August 14, 2006 /s/ Amerisa Kornblum         Amerisa Kornblum    Chief Financial Officer
[RUSSIAN TRANSLATION AND DUPLICATE SIGNATURES REMOVED]










CLARIFICATION TO  THE  CONTRACT  OF  PURCHASE  AND SALE OF THE SHARE IN CHARTER
CAPITAL OF LLC "ZAURALNEFTEGAZ"  DATED  25  MAY  2004

Kurgan                                                           2  August  2005

     LIMITED  LIABILITY  COMPANY  "REGION",  OGRN  No.1024500514598  hereinafter
referred  to  as  the  "Seller",  in  the  person  of  director  Shkodskih  Oleg
Anatolievich, and the Company SIBERIAN ENERGY GROUP INC. hereinafter referred to
as  the  "Buyer", in the person of the Chairman of the Board David Zaikin agreed
on the following:


                          MAKE CLARIFICATION TO THE ITEM
                           1. SUBJECT OF THE CONTRACT

     The  original intention of the parties on the matters reflected in item 1.3
of  the Agreement was as follows: LLC Region has agreed to sell its share of 49%
in  LLC "Zauralneftegaz" for a price of 172 US Dollars and a right of the Seller
to instruct the Buyer to transfer 6,900,000 shares of SIBERIAN ENERGY GROUP INC.
to  another  person  (persons)  at  the Seller's discretion. The above-mentioned
shares  have  to be transferred directly to the persons whose names are given in
the instructions of the Seller, without the Seller's acquiring the title to such
shares.


Buyer:
SIBERIAN  ENERGY  GROUP  INC.
275  Madison  Avenue,  6th  Floor,  New  York,  NY  100016

/S/  DAVID  ZAIKIN
----------------------------------------------------------
David  Zaikin,  Chairman  of  the  Board


Seller:  LLC  "REGION"
Russia, 640006, Kurgan Region, Kurgan, 27/X Lenina Street.

/S/  OLEG  ANATOLIEVICH  SHKODSKIH
----------------------------------------------------------
Oleg  Anatolievich  Shkodskih,  Director

August  2,  2005

<PAGE>
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 38635

STATE OF IDAHO
,

Plaintiff-Respondent
,

v.

JOHN FREDERICK HAMANN
,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2012 Unpublished Opinion No. 370

Filed: February 24, 2012

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS I S AN UNPUBLISHED
OPINION AND SHALL NOT
BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Si xth Judicial District, State of Idaho,
Bannock County. Hon. Stephen S. Dunn , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of seven years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years , for possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine

, affirmed

.

Sara B . Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Shawn F. Wilkerson, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

John Frederick Hamann pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance,

methamphetamine. I.C. § 37

- 2732(c)(1) . The district court sentenced Hamann to a unified term

of seven years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years . Hamann filed an I.C.R. 35

motion for reduction of his sentence, which the district court denied. Hamann appeals,

challenging only the excessiveness of his sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reaso nableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-2 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Tooh ill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewe d the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Hamann ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.