alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 279 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 279

   Recognizing the service of the crew members of the USS Enterprise 
   Battle Group during its extended deployment for the war effort in 
                              Afghanistan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 27, 2001

  Mr. Schrock (for himself, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Simmons, Mr. Larsen of 
 Washington, Mr. Holt, Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of Virginia, Mr. Forbes, and 
  Mr. Scott) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing the service of the crew members of the USS Enterprise 
   Battle Group during its extended deployment for the war effort in 
                              Afghanistan.

Whereas the USS Enterprise Battle Group was completing its deployment to the 
        Persian Gulf in support of Operation Southern Watch over Iraq, and was 
        en route back to the United States when the terrorist attacks occurred 
        on September 11, 2001;
Whereas USS Enterprise promptly changed course and returned to remain in the 
        region of its deployment to await orders from the National Command 
        Authority;
Whereas the USS Enterprise Battle Group, consisting of USS Enterprise, USS 
        Philippine Sea, USS Gettysburg, USS Arctic, USS Providence, USS 
        Jacksonville, USS McFaul, USS Gonzalez, USS Stout, USS Thorn, USS 
        Nicholson, and USS Nicholas, and aircraft from Airwing Eight, consisting 
        of the VF14 Tophatters, the VF41 Black Aces, the VFA15 Valions, the VFA 
        87 Golden Warriors, the VAW 124 Bear Aces, the VAQ 141 Shadowhawks, the 
        VS 24 Scouts, and the HS 3 Tridents, were involved in the first attack 
        on Afghanistan in the war against terrorism;
Whereas the deployment of these ships and their crews was extended by several 
        weeks in support of the war effort;
Whereas the families of the USS Enterprise Battle Group relied on each other for 
        strength and support, while keeping faith in their loved ones to defend 
        the freedoms and ideals of the United States; and
Whereas USS Enterprise returned to the naval base in Norfolk, Virginia, on 
        November 10, 2001: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress recognizes the service of the crew members of the USS 
Enterprise Battle Group during its extended deployment for the war 
effort in Afghanistan.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AARON RAISER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

DOUG LARGE, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14-55835 

D.C. No. 2:09-cv-00254-RGKAGR 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 21, 2017**

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Aaron Raiser appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his 

motion to amend his civil rights complaint to add claims of fraud, intentional 

misrepresentation, and false promise, arising from his expulsion from Ventura 

College of Law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

FILED

OCT 4 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-55835 

abuse of discretion the district court’s decision to deny leave to amend. Chappel v. 

Lab. Corp. of Am., 232 F.3d 719, 725 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm.

Because Raiser cannot allege facts sufficient to establish promissory fraud as 

against defendant Large, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying 

Raiser’s motion to amend his complaint. Thus, his proposed amendments, each of 

which sound in fraud, would have been futile. See id. at 725-26 (9th Cir. 2000) 

(“A district court acts within its discretion to deny leave to amend when 

amendment would be futile[.]”); see also Lazar v. Superior Court, 909 P.2d 981, 

985 (Cal. 1996) (setting forth the elements of promissory fraud).

We lack jurisdiction to consider the district court’s order denying Raiser’s 

June 23, 2014 motion, which the district court construed as a motion for 

reconsideration, because Raiser failed to file an amended or separate notice of 

appeal. See Whitaker v. Garcetti, 486 F.3d 572, 585 (9th Cir. 2007).

Raiser’s request to certify the questions at issue to the California Supreme 

Court, set forth in his reply brief, is denied.

AFFIRMED.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 7, 2011

d0131 

# Order

February 7, 2011

141736

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141736 COA: 298907 Washtenaw CC: 09-001068-FH TODD MATTHEW CELLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the A ugust 4, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                                            JURISDICTION OF      PERCENT OF
PARENT                     SUBSIDIARIES                        ORGANIZATION       OWNERSHIP
<S>                        <C>                                 <C>                     <C> 
Hawk Corporation           Friction Products Co.               Ohio                    100%
                           Logan Metal Stampings, Inc.         Ohio                    100%
                           Helsel, Inc.                        Delaware                100%
                           S.K. Wellman Holdings, Inc.         Delaware                100%
                           Hutchinson Products Corporation     Delaware                100%
                           Sinterloy Corporation               Delaware                100%
                           Clearfield Powdered Metals, Inc.    Pennsylvania            100%
                           Hawk International FSC, Corp.       Barbados                100%
                           Allegheny Powder Metallurgy, Inc.   Pennsylvania            100%

Friction Products Co.      Hawk Brake, Inc.                    Ohio                    100%

S.K. Wellman               S.K. Wellman Corp.                  Delaware                100%
Holdings, Inc.             Wellman Friction Products
                             U.K. Corp.                        Delaware                100%
                           S.K. Wellman S.p.A.                 Italy                    95%

S.K. Wellman Corp.         The S.K. Wellman Company
                             of Canada Limited                 Canada                  100%
                           S.K. Wellman S.p.A.                 Italy                     5%
</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Patriot Financial Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John D. Belew, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ John D.
      BelewJohn
      D. BelewChief
      Executive OfficerMay
      17, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 66 (Thursday, April 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8118]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than April 18, 2012.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Vice President) 
33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Giannoulias 2011 Checkspring Trust, Chicago, Illinois and Endy 
D. Zemenides, as trustee, to acquire control of CheckSpring Community 
Corporation, and thereby indirectly acquire control of CheckSpring 
Bank, both of Bronx, New York.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Travis Carr, Andover, Kansas, to retain shares and remain a 
member of the Carr Family Group, which controls Community State 
Bancshares, Inc., and thereby control Community Bank of Wichita, Inc., 
both in Wichita, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 30, 
2012.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012-8118 Filed 4-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0393 SAT Date: 4/26/2013 Print Date: 6/4/2013

Related cases : Health related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 1

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 1 1 PMN 3 1 1 Hyd Pdt

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ; Hyd Pdt negl Keywords : Keywords: SENS-DERMAL/RESPIRATORY, IRR, LUNG Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-19-0393 FATE: Solid with MP = 110 C (E) S = Reacts Hydrolysis half-life = hr-da VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = PMN 90-99 via hydrolysis, then Hyd Pdt 90 via sorptionTime for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Hyd Pdt > mo Sorption to soils/sediments = Hyd Pdt v.strong PBT Potential: PMN P1B1; Hyd Pdt P3B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = Hyd Pdt negl

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is nil all routes as the neat material and poor all routes for the low molecular weight fraction when in solution based on physical/chemical properties. There is concern for dermal and respiratory sensitization, irritation to all moist tissues, and lung effects if inhaled based on the low molecular weight isocyanates. Low moderate concern.

Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 * fish

_ chronic value * daphnid

_ chronic value *
algal

_ chronic value *
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic polymers; SAR chemical class = p olyme r -nonionic- N CO; ; S = reacts with water at 20 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) *

SARs nonionic polymers SAR Class p olyme r -nonionic- N CO Ecotox Category N onionic Polymers
Ecotox Factors Comments:
SAT Chair: Becky Jones
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 128156 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman,

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 128156 

 COA: 258410 

Oakland CC: 2002-186986-FC 

TORE LEADEONTRE PRICE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 11, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of 

People v McKay (Docket No. 126930) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the 

decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to 

appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in 

that case. 

KELLY, J., states: 

While I concur in abeying for People v McKay, I would also hold this case in 

abeyance for People v Drohan, lv gtd 472 Mich 881 (2005). 

d0919 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 28, 2005
 

Clerk
#### STATE ex rel. Eugene JACKSON v. Frank C. BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 86-KH-2081.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1987.

In re Jackson, Eugene; applying for remedial writs; Parish of Madison, 6th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 269-74.

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., and CALOGERO and DENNIS, JJ., would grant the writ.
#### STATE ex rel. Henry TALLEY v. J.F. DONNELLY, Jr., Warden.

No. 86-KH-2124.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1987.

In re Talley, Henry; applying for supervisory writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 280-956.

Granted. Maximum sentence is apparently excessive. Sentence is set aside. Case remanded to the district court for resentencing after complying with La.Code Cr.P. art. 894.1.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of M.J. and M.J., * From the 326th District Court

children, of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 9062-CX.

No. 11-20-00155-CV * December 18, 2020

* Memorandum Opinion by Wright, S.C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
[No. 36831-1-I.

Division One.

August 12, 1996.]

#### Teddy N. Moore, Respondent, v. Velma D. Whetstone, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Sno-homish County, No. 93-2-04963-1, Richard J. Thorpe, J., entered June 1, 1995. *Affirmed*hy unpublished per curiam opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 343 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 343

  Expressing the sense of the Congress supporting music education and 
                      Music in Our Schools Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2002

Mr. Clement (for himself, Mr. Cunningham, Mrs. Davis of California, Mr. 
     Phelps, and Mr. Etheridge) submitted the following concurrent 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
                               Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress supporting music education and 
                      Music in Our Schools Month.

Whereas music education significantly enhances the morale of students and the 
        quality of the school environment;
Whereas music education helps students acquire musical production and 
        performance skills and a better understanding of history and culture;
Whereas the study of music contributes to the development of young people by 
        teaching them necessary skills, including abstract reasoning, listening, 
        reading, self-expression, creativity, teamwork, and self-discipline;
Whereas students who participate in school music programs are less likely to be 
        involved with drugs, alcohol, or delinquent or criminal behavior;
Whereas there is a direct correlation between music instruction and aptitude in 
        math and science;
Whereas the National Association for Music Education, the International Music 
        Products Association, and their partners in the education, business, and 
        arts communities are celebrating March 2002 as Music in Our Schools 
        Month; and
Whereas Music in Our Schools Month provides an opportunity for the people of the 
        United States to demonstrate their support for music education: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) schools should include quality music education as part 
        of a rigorous curriculum;
            (2) all students should have access to a well-balanced, 
        comprehensive, sequential program of music taught by qualified 
        teachers;
            (3) music educators should be recognized and commended for 
        their concern for and efforts to enhance the quality of music 
        education;
            (4) research to determine the extent to which music 
        education contributes to the cognitive development of children 
        should be encouraged; and
            (5) teachers, parents, students, the business community, 
        and all people in the United States should support and 
        participate in Music in Our Schools Month.
                                 <all>
```
AAM

- 1 3

- 3 23

- E May 01, 2013

Exemption No. 10287 A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 20 11

- 0 600

Mr. Scott Bekken

Director of Operations

Executive Air Taxi Corp.

P.O. Box 2273

Bismarck, ND 58502

Dear Mr. Bekken :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No.

10287. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions and

limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 1, 2013 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of Executive Air Taxi Corporation (EAT) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14,

Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow EAT to cover i ts

safety

- sensitive employees under one testing program while operating under separate parts of

the regulation.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any

delay in acting on this petit ion would be detrimental to EAT

.

Our Decision2

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10287

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Executive Air Taxi are subject to the drug and alcohol regulation s at

all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the auspices of the

Executive Air Taxi part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on July 31, 201 5 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

James R . F r aser , M.D.

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 POLYPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polypore International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 13, 2007
    /s/  Lynn AmosLynn AmosChief Financial Officer