alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
31.1: Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications





I, Qingfu
Ren, certify that:





1.  I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Internet Acquisition Group,
Inc.;




2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this  report;


3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in
this  report;




4.  The
small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and
have:




a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this  report is being
prepared;




b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal
controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s first fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):




a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to  adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and




b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over
financial reporting.




Date:
      May 13, 2008
            /s/
      Qingfu Ren


Qingfu Ren, Chief Executive Officer


and Chief Financial Officer
#### Karen Anderson JOHANSSON, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Leif JOHANSSON, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 18581.

Supreme Court of Utah.

June 14, 1983.

Con Kostopulos, Salt Lake City, for defendant and appellant.

John C. Green, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal stems from the denial of a post-divorce petition to modify by way of elimination of a $100 alimony award. The only contention on appeal is that this Court would serve equity in requiring such modification.

The divorce actually became final 20 months after the marriage. By stipulation, the interlocutory period was extended for 3 months to accommodate a winding up of existing marital problems. The appellant failed to pay the alimony or marital debts as ordered by the court, and allowed his default to be entered with no objection. He appeared at the divorce hearing without counsel, and did not appeal the decree. After the decree was entered, the respondent garnished his wages for credit on delinquent alimony and petitioned for a contempt show-cause order for the same reason. At the hearing, he again appeared without counsel and was ordered to pay the accrued alimony.

At this juncture, the appellant retained counsel and filed a petition to modify the decree. His petition asserted that: (a) the parties had been married for only 6 months, which belies the chronology of events, *supra;*(b) he was not represented by counsel to date; (c) the respondent is fully employed; and (d) the modification should be forthcoming.

In the decree, the trial court found that “[t]he plaintiff [respondent] is without sufficient funds to properly maintain herself.” This is a finding of “need,” which this Court and others uniformly assign as a factor that, for modification, requires a showing of changed circumstances. None of the above reasons assigned by defendant is reflective of a change in circumstances.1 The appellant has not sustained his burden of proving such change since the decree sufficient to justify a modification.

No issue has been urged to the effect that there was a prejudicial abuse of discretion. The only “issue” raised is that “[t]he District Court should modify the divorce decree on the basis of equity alone.” The thrust of appellant’s thesis is that where one is not represented by counsel in a divorce action, with its attendant emotionalism, he should be able to seek the aid of this Court to modify the decree, even though he filed no timely appeal from the decree. He cites no authority for his unusual request. Even so, the facts of this case could not be the subject for application of such suggested and unsupported departure from the accepted rule with respect to relief based on changed circumstances.

*1317The lower court’s denial of the appellant’s petition is affirmed.

1

. *English v. English,*Utah, 565 P.2d 409 (1977).
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 409

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Community Role Models Week, and for other purposes.

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 409

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas individuals who are motivated every day by traditional American values such as selflessness, compassion,

dedication, courage, and integrity have a positive effect

on society by encouraging others to act in a similar manner;
2

•HCON 409 EH

Whereas individuals in local communities located throughout

the United States embody these values in their daily

work, communities, and homes;

Whereas children and adults would benefit from learning

about individuals in their community who embody these

values and about what motivates them;

Whereas because children learn and act by examples they experience on a daily basis, they need role models from

their local community with whom they can realistically

relate;

Whereas inspiring stories about an individual that a child

knows or might meet in the community can make a difference in that child’s decisions and life;

Whereas the Recognizing Achievement—Rewarding Excellence Foundation (R.A.R.E. Foundation) based in Troy,

Michigan, has established a program to recognize exceptional people who work in the community and further

educate children in the community about such people;

Whereas the R.A.R.E. Foundation is willing to provide guidance to any community interested in starting such a program; and

Whereas National Community Role Models Week is a fitting

tribute to the many individuals who displayed motivation,

selflessness, compassion, dedication, courage, and integrity during the aftermath of the terrorist attacks against

the United States which occurred on September 11,

2001: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress—
3

•HCON 409 EH

1 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National

2 Community Role Models Week;

3 (2) commends the Recognizing Achievement—

4 Rewarding Excellence Foundation based in Troy,

5 Michigan, for establishing a program to recognize

6 exceptional people who work in the community and

7 further educate children in the community about

8 such people; and

9 (3) encourages the establishment of similar pro10 grams in communities throughout the United States.

Passed the House of Representatives October 7,

2002.

Attest:

Clerk.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00210-CV

PLAINSCAPITAL BANK 

v.

RICARDO DIAZ MIRANDA

On Appeal from the

275th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-6048-13-E

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered. The 

Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment that 

that PlainsCapital is entitled to the following unpaid balances of principal and interest: 

(1) $935,107.76 on the Moorefield Note; (2) $4,482,769.13 on the McColl Note; and (3) 

$2,146,685.62 on the Cold-Storage Note. We further render that Diaz take nothing in 

attorneys' fees. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against the appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 15, 2018
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002** 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of BurTechAcquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany.

 

Date: March 31, 2022

 

/s/ Shahal Khan

Shahal Khan

Chief Executive Officer andDirector

(Principal executive officer)

 

Date: March 31, 2022

 

 

/s/ Roman Livson

Roman Livson

Chief Financial Officer andSecretary

(Principal financial and accountingofficer)
#### Edward CUMMINGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. BG-358.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 19, 1986.

*122Gilbert A. Schaffnit, Gainesville, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Gary L. Printy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appel-lee.

ZEHMER, Judge.

Appellant, Edward Cummings, negotiated a plea to grand theft and was sentenced beyond the recommended range under the sentencing guidelines. He contends that the reasons for departure are insufficient. Once again we are required to reverse and remand for resentencing.

The following written reasons for departure were given by the trial judge:

> 1) extensive (sic) juvenile record; 2) prior felony incarceration; 3) number of cases dismissed as a condition of plea, (sic) amount (sic) to picture of a person who is a scofflaw. See transcript of Sentencing (sic) hearing to be forwarded.

The first ground is based upon several juvenile offenses, one of which occurred within the past three years and should have been, but was not, included on the sentencing guidelines scoresheet. There were, however, several other convictions beyond the three-year period which could not be included; therefore, we find no substantial reason to reject this ground for departure. *Weems v. State,*469 So.2d 128 (Fla.1985); rule 3.701(d)(5), Fla.R. Crim.P.

We hold that the remaining grounds are insufficient. The reference to prior felony incarceration is so tied to the prior conviction included in calculating the scoresheet that it is improper. *Patty v. State,*486 So.2d 16 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). The reference to the number of cases dismissed as a condition of the plea violates the requirement of the rule that no consideration be given to “factors relating to prior arrests without conviction” and “factors relating to the instant offenses for which convictions have not been obtained.” Rule 3.701(d)(ll), Fla.R.Crim.P. Characterization of the appellant as a “scofflaw” appears to be based on the facts recited in grounds one through three and adds nothing of substance, independent of those grounds, that would support departure.

The record containing nothing to convince us beyond a reasonable doubt that the trial judge would have given the same sentence irrespective of the impropriety of three of *123the four grounds stated, we must remand for resentencing.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

SHIVERS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8008]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public 
comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the 
Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, April 25, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Gilbert at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(515) 564-6638.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be held Wednesday, April 25, 2012, 2 p.m. Eastern Time via 
teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Notification of intent to 
participate must be made with Susan Gilbert. For more information 
please contact Ms. Gilbert at 1-888-912-1227 or (515) 564-6638 or 
write: TAP Office, 210 Walnut Street, Stop 5115, Des Moines, IA 50309 
or contact us at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS topics.

    Dated: March 26, 2012.
Louis Morizio,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2012-8008 Filed 4-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 230 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 230

   Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the establishment of a 
                      National Day of Remembrance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 2001

  Mr. Wynn (for himself and Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the establishment of a 
                      National Day of Remembrance.

Whereas on September 11, 2001, evil acts of terrorism were perpetrated against 
        the people of the United States and all humanity;
Whereas thousands of people lost their lives as a result of the terrorist 
        attacks of September 11, 2001;
Whereas hundreds of fire fighters, police officers, and rescue workers gave 
        their lives in a valiant effort to save the lives of other victims of 
        these horrific terrorist attacks;
Whereas neither the Government nor the people of the United States will be 
        deterred by acts of terrorism;
Whereas the Government and people of the United States are united in the effort 
        to stand against any future acts of terrorism; and
Whereas the establishment of September 11 as a National Day of Remembrance would 
        provide an opportunity to remember the victims who lost their lives as a 
        result of these vicious terrorist attacks, and to honor the people of 
        the United States who displayed heroism and courage during and after the 
        attacks: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
    (1) a National Day of Remembrance should be established to remember 
the victims who lost their lives as a result of the terrorist attacks 
of September 11, 2001, and to honor the people of the United States who 
displayed heroism and courage during and after the attacks; and
    (2) the President should issue a proclamation calling on the people 
of the United States to observe such a day with appropriate programs 
and activities.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

GMH COMMUNITIESTRUST

 

CERTIFICATIONSREQUIRED BY

RULE 13a-14(a) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

I, Bradley W. Harris,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of GMH Communities Trust, aMaryland real estate investment trust (the “Company”), hereby certify that, tomy knowledge:

 

(1)           The Company’s periodic report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2005 (the “Form 10-Q”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

*        *        *

 

 
| /s/ Bradley W. Harris         |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| Bradley W. Harris             |
| Senior Vice President         |
| and Chief Financial  Officer  |
|                          |
|                          |
| Date: November 14,  2005 |

 

----
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-60635 Summary Calendar

FRANCISCO ALANIZ-SAENZ, Petitioner,

versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. A21 578 011

- - - - - - - - - - July 18, 1996 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Francisco Alaniz-Saenz petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that he was deportable under subsections 241(a)(2)(B)(i) and 241(a)(2)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (Act), 8 U.S.C. § 1251(a)(2)(B)(i) and 1251(a)(2)(C). Alaniz-Saenz argues that the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) did not prove that he was convicted of a firearm offense within the meaning of § 1251(a)(2)(C) and that there was a fatal variance between theNo. 95-60635 - 2 - INS’ pleading and the proof of the firearm offense. He maintains the INS alleged he was carrying a .32 caliber semi-automatic Colt handgun, but failed to present evidence that he was convicted of carrying that type of handgun. The BIA found the INS establishedthrough clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that AlanizSaenz’s conviction for carrying a handgun was a firearm offense for which he was deportable under § 1251(a)(2)(C). Alaniz-Saenz has not presented compelling evidence to the contrary. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992); Chun v. INS , 40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1994). The BIA also implicitly determinedthat the INS need not establish the type of handgun that AlanizSaenz was convicted of carrying in order to establish that he was deportable under § 1251(a)(2)(C). The BIA’s interpretation of § 1251(a)(2)(C) is reasonable. See Iredia v. INS , 981 F.2d 847, 849 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 114 S. Ct. 203 (1993). The petition for review is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of JER Investors
Trust Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Joseph E. Robert, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 11, 2009



/s/ Joseph E. Robert, Jr.Name:

Joseph E. Robert, Jr.Title:

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
[No. 14627-8-III.

Division Three.

August 13, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Clarence Jude Stensgar, Jr., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Ferry County, No. 94-1-00011-0, Fred L. Stewart, J., entered January 17, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, A.C.J., concurred in by Munson and Thompson, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Rick R. Holley, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 27, 2007By:

/s/ Rick R. HolleyRICK R. HOLLEY President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.