alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 245

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be issued

to honor coal miners.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 9, 2001

Mrs. CAPITO (for herself, Mr. KANJORSKI, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. NEY, Mr.

STRICKLAND, Mr. HILLIARD, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. MURTHA, Mr. MASCARA,

Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. OBERSTAR, and Mr. WELLER) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp

should be issued to honor coal miners.

Whereas the Nation is greatly indebted to coal miners for the

difficult and dangerous work they have performed to provide the fuel needed to operate the Nation’s industries

and to provide energy to homes and businesses;

Whereas millions of workers have toiled in the Nation’s coal

mines over the last century, risking both life and limb to

fuel the Nation’s economic expansion;

Whereas during the last century over 100,000 coal miners

have been killed in mining accidents in the Nation’s coal

mines, and 3,500,000 coal miners have suffered non-fatal

injuries;
2

•HCON 245 IH

Whereas 100,000 coal miners have contracted Black Lung

disease as a direct result of their toil in the Nation’s coal

mines;

Whereas coal provides 50 percent of the Nation’s electricity

and is an essential fuel for industries such as steel, cement, chemicals, food, and paper;

Whereas the United States has a demonstrated coal reserve

of more than 500 billion tons, with an estimated 275 billion tons of recoverable reserves which, at current production rates, represents about 275 years of recoverable

coal reserves;

Whereas these coal reserves represent about 95 percent of all

fossil fuel reserves in the United States, and about one

fourth of the world’s known coal reserves;

Whereas the recoverable coal reserves in the United States

have the energy equivalent of about 1 trillion barrels of

oil, which is comparable to all of the world’s known oil

reserves;

Whereas since the energy crises of the 1970s, United States’

dependence on foreign oil has grown substantially, with

imported oil accounting for 39 percent of all oil consumed

in 1973 and about 60 percent today;

Whereas energy security is an integral component of the Nation’s economy and national security;

Whereas coal mining continues to be the economic engine for

many communities, providing jobs to areas with little economic diversity;

Whereas coal mining provides economic benefit far beyond its

direct revenue, including billions of dollars in economic

output and household earnings and hundreds of thousands of jobs in other industries; and
3

•HCON 245 IH

Whereas issuing a postage stamp to honor the Nation’s coal

miners is fitting and proper: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) the United States Postal Service should

4 issue a stamp honoring the Nation’s coal miners;

5 and

6 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

7 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

8 such a stamp be issued.

Æ
#### Donna Harris GRIFFIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 67224.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 10, 1987.

*670Lawrence D. Shearer and Daphne Boswell, Bartow, for petitioner.

Candance M. Sunderland, Tampa, for respondent.

ORDER ENFORCING MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

In this cause this Court did review *Griffin v. State,*470 So.2d 103 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), in which the District Court certified a question of great public importance. In our opinion dated December 5, 1985, *Griffin v. State,*479 So.2d 739 (Fla.1985), we answered the certified question, holding that a departure sentence grounded on both permissible and impermissible reasons must be reversed and the defendant resen-tenced unless the state is able to show beyond a reasonable doubt that the absence of the impermissible reason(s) would not have affected the departure sentence. Accordingly, we quashed the district court’s decision with directions that the district court remand to the trial court for resen-tencing.

On remand, it appears that the trial court merely issued in chambers an order confirming that the departure sentence would have been imposed upon the Petitioner based solely on the valid written reasons. The trial judge did not interpret this Court's opinion as requiring a resen-tencing hearing and, therefore, a hearing was not held and neither Petitioner nor Petitioner’s counsel was present or otherwise allowed to be heard.

This Court specifically directed a resen-tencing in this cause rather than directing the trial court to merely affirm that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the impermissible reasons. By resen-tencing we mean a full sentencing proceeding which necessarily includes the presence of the defendant and his or her attorney. The pronouncement of sentence upon a criminal defendant is a critical stage of the proceedings to which all due process guarantees attach whether the sentence is the immediate result of adjudication of guilt or, as here, the sentence is the result of an order directing the trial court to resentence the defendant. See *State v. Scott,*439 So.2d 219 (Fla.1983). The presence of the defendant is as necessary at resentencing as it was at the time of the original sentence so that the defendant has the opportunity to submit evidence relevant to the sentence if warranted unless otherwise ordered by this Court.

Pursuant to the power of this Court to enforce its mandate, the trial court’s order, dated February 12, 1986, is hereby vacated and the trial judge is directed to hold a resentencing proceeding consistent with this order.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
EX-10.4






Exhibit 10.4




FIRST AMENDMENT made this 10th day of August, 2005 to the Agreement dated as of
December 8, 2004 (the “Agreement”) by and between Jacuzzi Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”) with its principal office in West Palm Beach, Florida, and David H. Clarke, a resident
of Wellington, Florida (the “Executive”) (collectively, the “Parties”).



WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have previously entered into the Agreement; and



WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement.



NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:



1. The second recital of the Agreement is amended by deleting it in its entirety and
replacing it as follows:



“WHEREAS, the Executive has expressed his intention to retire as Chief Executive Officer and
executive Chairman of the Board at such time as the Executive and the Board may mutually agree (and
the effective date of his retirement from these positions shall be his “Retirement Date”).”



Notwithstanding the foregoing, in order to comply with the provisions of Section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the regulations for which have not been issued as of the
date hereof), the Parties hereby acknowledge that solely for purposes of Section 3(e) of the
Agreement, the term “Retirement Date” shall still mean October 2, 2005.



2. The Executive hereby acknowledges and agrees that the amount of the payments he shall be
entitled to under the Company’s Supplemental Retirement Plan (the “SRP”) may be adjusted to the
extent necessary so that the amounts he receives under the SRP and under the special retirement
arrangement set forth in Section 3(e) of the Agreement are in the aggregate no greater than the
amounts he would have received under both arrangements had the Executive actually retired on
October 2, 2005.



The Agreement, as amended herein, shall remain in full force and effect.



1



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has duly executed this Agreement as of the date
first above written.



JACUZZI BRANDS, INC.



/s/ Steven C. Barre



	 
	Name:	 	Steven C. Barre
	Title: Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary





/s/ David H. Clarke


     


David H. Clarke




2
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Leonard A. Foxman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Eagle Test Systems, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:February 12, 2007         /s/ Leonard A. Foxman   Leonard A. Foxman   *Chief Executive Officer and President*
EXHIBIT
32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification








Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Internet Acquisition
Group, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies that:




1.           
The nine months Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended June
30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and




2.           
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.










Date:  August
14, 2008







/s/Qingfu Ren


Qingfu
Ren, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50853 Conference Calendar

STEVEN EDWARD MOSS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GUADALUPE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; MELVIN HARBORTH, SHERIFF; BRENDA BOUNDS, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-94-CV-864

- - - - - - - - - - August 21, 1996 Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Steven Moss, T.D.C.J.# 592042, a convicted prisoner, appeals the dismissal of his complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging denial of access to medical care, deprivation of liberty without due process, and denial of access to the courts. We have reviewed the record and the opinion of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the same reasons given by the magistrate judge. Moss v. Guadalupe CountyNo. 95-50853 - 2 - Commissioners , No. SA-94-CV-864 (W.D. Tex. Oct. 18, 1995).
AFFIRMED.
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

4/27/2015 COA Case No. 02-14-00124-CR

ISBELL, JOHN B. Tr. Ct. No. 1290119D PD-0469-15

On this day, this Court has granted the State’s motion for an extension of time in

which to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. The time to file the petition has

been extended to Wednesday, May 27, 2015. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL

BE ENTERTAINED. NOTE: Petition For Discretionary Review must be filed with

the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

LISA MCMINN

STATE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY

P.O. BOX 13046

AUSTIN, TX 78711

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

FILE COPY
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

4/27/2015 COA Case No. 02-14-00124-CR

ISBELL, JOHN B. Tr. Ct. No. 1290119D PD-0469-15

On this day, this Court has granted the State’s motion for an extension of time in

which to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. The time to file the petition has

been extended to Wednesday, May 27, 2015. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL

BE ENTERTAINED. NOTE: Petition For Discretionary Review must be filed with

the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

BARRY G. JOHNSON

2821 E. LANCASTER

FT WORTH, TX 76103

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

FILE COPY
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

4/27/2015 COA Case No. 02-14-00124-CR

ISBELL, JOHN B. Tr. Ct. No. 1290119D PD-0469-15

On this day, this Court has granted the State’s motion for an extension of time in

which to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. The time to file the petition has

been extended to Wednesday, May 27, 2015. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL

BE ENTERTAINED. NOTE: Petition For Discretionary Review must be filed with

the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

2ND COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

DEBRA SPISAK

401 W. BELKNAP, STE 9000

FORT WORTH, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

FILE COPY
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

4/27/2015 COA Case No. 02-14-00124-CR

ISBELL, JOHN B. Tr. Ct. No. 1290119D PD-0469-15

On this day, this Court has granted the State’s motion for an extension of time in

which to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. The time to file the petition has

been extended to Wednesday, May 27, 2015. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL

BE ENTERTAINED. NOTE: Petition For Discretionary Review must be filed with

the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

C. JAMES GIBSON

ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY

401 W. BELKNAP

FORT WORTH, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

FILE COPY
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ C ase No. 5D 23- 1592 LT Case No. 2019

- CF

- 001503 -A

_____________________________ D OUGLAS M. W ILLIAMS , A ppellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , A ppellee.

_____________________________
O n appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County

. David B. Eddy , Judge

. M atthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Teresa D. Sutton, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach , for Appellant.
D ouglas M. Williams , Bonifay, pro se.
A s hley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach , for Appellee.
N ovember 1 4, 2023

P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

. E DWARDS , C.J. , M AKAR , and J AY , JJ., concur .2 _

____________________________ N ot final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 138 (Friday, July 18, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 42001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16910]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Secretary of Energy Advisory Board

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a teleconference call of the Secretary 
of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB). SEAB was reestablished pursuant to the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770). This 
notice is provided in accordance with the Act.

DATES: Friday, August 1, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 11:45 a.m. (ET). To 
receive the call-in number and passcode, please contact the Board's 
Designated Federal Officer (DFO) at the address or phone number listed 
below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Gibson, Designated Federal 
Officer, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., 
Washington, DC 20585; telephone: (202) 586-3787; email: 
seab@hq.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Background: The Board was established to provide advice and 
recommendations to the Secretary on the Department's basic and applied 
research, economic and national security policy, educational issues, 
operational issues, and other activities as directed by the Secretary.
    Purpose of the Meeting: This meeting is a public meeting of the 
Board.
    Tentative Agenda: The meeting will start at 11:00 a.m. on August 1, 
2014. The tentative meeting agenda includes updates on the work of the 
SEAB Next Generation High Performance Computing Task Force and comments 
from the public. The meeting will conclude at 11:45 a.m. Agenda updates 
and a draft of the report will be posted on the SEAB Web site: 
www.energy.gov/seab.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral statements 
pertaining to agenda items should contact Karen Gibson at the address 
or email address listed above. Requests to make oral comments must be 
received five days prior to the meeting. The Designated Federal Officer 
is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate 
the orderly conduct of business.
    Those not able to join the teleconference call or who have 
insufficient time to address the committee are invited to send a 
written statement to Karen Gibson, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585, or email to: 
seab@hq.doe.gov.
    Minutes: The minutes of the meeting will be available by contacting 
Ms. Gibson. She may be reached at the postal address or email address 
above, or by visiting SEAB's Web site at www.energy.gov/seab.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 14, 2014.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-16910 Filed 7-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer of GFI Group Inc.  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GFI Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James A. Peers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



Date:
November 10, 2008

|                                       |  | 
|-------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ JAMES A. PEERS                     |  | 
|James A. Peers Chief Financial Officer |  | 

---



QuickLinks
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 28, 2014

p1020 

# Order

Clerk October 28, 2014

148594(41)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MIC HIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148594

COA: 309821

Wayne CC: 09

- 010589

- FC

ANTHONY CRAIG WEST

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 24, 2014

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Section 1350 Certification**

 

** Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

** (Subsections(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code)**

 

Pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of theundersigned officers of Symmetry Medical Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”),does hereby certify that:

 

The QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”)of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained inthe Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 

 
| April 23, 2008 | /s/ Brian S. Moore        |
|---------------------|---------------------------|
|                | Brian S. Moore            |
|                | *Chief Executive Officer* |
| * *            |                      |
| * *            |                      |
|                | /s/ Fred L. Hite          |
|                | Fred L. Hite              |
|                | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
#### In re the CHILDREN OF Susan Elizabeth Guilliams WHEAT.

No. 88-CC-0193.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 26, 1988.

In re Guilliams, Jeanette Barbo — Other; Guilliams, Jefferson Oliver — Other; applying for writ of certiorari and supervisory and remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW87-1312; Parish of Natchitoches, 10th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 10600.

Denied.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ MATTHEW T. CRUMLEY, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2017

- 2570

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:16

- cv

- 00389

- LAS, Senior Judge Loren A. Smith.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________

M ATTHEW L EO E ANET , Eanet, PC, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff

- appellant.

K ELLY A. K RYSTYNIAK , Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant

- appellee. Also represented by R OBERT E DWARD K IRSCHMAN , J R ., D OUGLAS K. M ICKLE , C HAD A. R EADLER , M ICHAEL D. S NYDER ; J OHNATHAN D. H AMILTON , Air Force Legal Ope r-ations Agency, United States Department of the Air Force, Joint Base Andrews, MD.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge, M OORE and T ARANTO , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

October 5, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court