alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Mobile | Español |Site Map | Links | FAQ | Videos | Contacts



### Find and Compare Cars

Gas mileage (MPG), fuel cost, greenhouse gas emissions, energy impact score, air pollution ratings, and safety information for new and us e cars and trucks

Compare Side-by-Side

fueleconomy.gov/m Alternative Fueling Station Locator 

### Your MPG

Calculate or Share Your MPG View Estimates from Drivers Like You

Gas Mileage Tips.. Driving More Efficiently Keeping Your Car in Shape Planning and Combining Trips Choosing an Efficient Car

Save Money...
Gasoline Prices Tax Incentive Center Find the Cheapest Gas Fuel Cost Calculator
Why is Fuel Economy Important? Climate Change Oil Dependence Energy Sustainability Save Money 

### In the news... Demo Leafs headed to dealers in December; cold weather package coming soon - Autoblog Honda Continues CNG-Powered Civic, In Shadow of Hybrids and EVs - HybridCars.com 'Start-stop' technology headed to U.S. - The Detroit News Disclaimer 

### More News
New Fuel Economy Label Coming Soon! Help Design the New Fuel Economy Label Print Copies of All Label Options
Fueleconomy.gov's Top Ten Lists Fuel Economy Myths EPA Fuel Sippers (All Years) Fuel Sippers as Rated by Our Users
www.ahorremosgasolina.org Encuentre y Compare Automóviles Consejos para Ahorrar Gasolina ¿Por qué es Importante Ahorrar Gasolina?

Clean Cities Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center


### | Share

Download EPA's MPG Ratings | Find and Compare Cars | USA.gov | Info for Auto Dealers | Privacy/Security | Feedback This site last modified Monday September 20 2010 

### Find a Car Tips Save Money Benefits Your MPG Hybrids Electric Vehicles Diesels Alt Fuels Extreme MPG More Topics



### Mobile Web Sites

Hybrid Vehicles Electric Vehicles Diesel Vehicles and Fuels Alternative Fuel Vehicles Extreme MPG Your MPG Will Still Vary Energy Efficient Technologies MotorWeek Videos Fuel Economy Guide 

# Page 1 of 1 Fuel Economy

9/20/2010 mhtml:file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\acastill\Local Settin g s\Tem p \notesFCBCEE\~585

...
### 900 N. Shore Road, Beesley’s Point, NJ 08223 Phone: (609) 390-5101 Fax: (609) 390-5185 July 9, 2010

Jezebele Alicea USEPA Headquarters Ariel Rios Building 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Mail Code: 4303T Washington, DC 20460 alicea.jezebele@epa.gov

202-566-1755

RE: B. L. England Generating Station Plant ID 03146 Extension Request for Questionnaire Version 2

Ms. Alicea,

The purpose of this letter is to request an extensio n to respond to the Questionnaire issued to B. L. England Station under the Clean Water Act until Novemb er 1, 2010. The Questionnaire was received at this facility on June 18, 2010 and an extension can be requested within 21 days after receipt.

I understand that extensions will be evaluated on a case by case basis. I propose an extension until November 1, based on the fact that the Questionnaire was received in mid June (the peak season for a power generating facility located in a seasonal resort area) and we are resource constrained at this time. Allowing an extension until November 1 will enable our team to get through the peak electrical generation season and allow sufficient time to complete the Questionnaire in a more accurate manner.

I am available at your convenience to discuss this request. Please use the contact information below to reach me. Thank you, in advance, for your consideration in this matter.

Sincerely,



## Andrew Shawl

Andrew Shawl, PE Environmental Manager

B. L. England Station

900 North Shore Road Beesley’s Point, NJ 08223

Phone 609 390 5113

Fax 609 390 5149

e-mail andrew.shawl@blengland.com
#### W. S. Ware, as Administrator, &c., Appellant, v. The Springfield Company, Appellee.

Division A.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Duval county; Rhydon M. Call, Judge.

*422
      *A.*TP. *Cockrell é Son,*for Appellant.

TP. *B. Young,*for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

' The bill in this cause was filed by the appellee against the appellant. There was decree for the complainant, and the defendant appeals. The decree is affirmed.

Decision
H. Con. Res. 305 Agreed to March 6, 2002

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used

on May 16, 2002, for a ceremony to present a gold medal on

behalf of Congress to former President Ronald Reagan and his

wife Nancy Reagan. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall

be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the Architect

of the Capitol may prescribe.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
Order entered June 29, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00418-CV

ANTIONETTE IRVIN-LINTZ, Appellant

V.

DALLAS HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-01051-B

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case has not been filed. By letter dated May 29, 2018, we 

informed appellant the court reporter notified us that the reporter’s record had not been filed 

because appellant had not (1) requested the record; or (2) paid for or made arrangements to pay 

for the record. We directed appellant to provide the Court with written verification showing the 

reporter’s record had been requested and that appellant had paid for or made arrangements to pay 

for the record or had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned 

appellant that failure to provide the required documentation within ten days might result in the 

appeal being ordered submitted without the reporter’s record. To date, appellant has not 

provided the required documentation nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the 
status of the reporter’s record.1

 Therefore, we ORDER this appeal submitted without a 

reporter’s record. 

Appellant’s brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE

 

1 A supplemental clerk’s record containing appellant’s affidavit of inability to pay costs filed in the justice court was 

filed on June 1, 2018 at the Court’s request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date: January 29, 2007/s/ R. Michael Andrews, Jr.R. Michael Andrews, Jr.Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
AFS

- 13

- 3 98

- E July 1, 2013

Exemption No. 10815

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 20 1 3

- 0 4 96

Ms

. Mariano Aguilar

Parent of Grace Aguilar Abascal

67 Whisperwood Road

Thornhill, Ont ario L4J9C9

Dear Ms. Aguilar :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our

decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption,

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received May 31 , 2013 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administrat ion (FAA)

on behalf of Grace Aguilar Abascal for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14,

Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)

. That exemp tion

, if granted, would allow Grace to

exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA

- approved child restraint system (CAReS,

manufactured by AmSafe Corporation ) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard

a United States (U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exem ption would not set a precedent and any

delay in acting on this petition would be det rimental to Grace

.

The FAA has issued gra nts of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA

found that numerous p eople with physical challenges had previously completed flights using

restr aint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the2

petition , if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the us e of restraint systems by

persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that

—

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

• the reasons stated by the FAA for grant ing the enclosed exemption also apply to the

situation you present ; and

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator

has delegated to me, I hereby gra nt Grace Aguilar Abascal an exemption from § 121.311(b).

In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Grace is

aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary

to allow h er to use an FAA

- approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft

.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted w ith at least one of Grace ’s parents or a caregiver accompanying her

. Grace Aguilar Abascal may only occupy a passenger seat with

no passenger se ated behind her

. In addition, Grace ’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of

this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours

before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on June 30 , 201 8 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen

Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
----

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                          |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|   | 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the report. |

|   |                    |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | /s/ Thomas A. Borner    |   |
|   | Thomas A. Borner        |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
EXHIBIT
32.1





Section 1350
Certification


Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)





Pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of Symmetry Medical Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”),
does hereby certify that:





The Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter and three months ended April 3, 2010 (the
“Form 10-Q”) of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.





August 6,
2010


/s/
      Brian S. MooreBrian
      S. MooreChief
      Executive Officer/s/
      Fred L. HiteFred
      L. HiteChief
      Financial Officer
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 348

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Book Festival.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 12, 2002

Mr. LATOURETTE (for himself and Mr. COSTELLO) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National

Book Festival.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL

4 GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL BOOK FESTIVAL.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Library of Congress (in this

6 resolution referred to as the ‘‘sponsor’’), in cooperation

7 with the First Lady, may sponsor the National Book Fes8 tival (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘event’’) on the

9 Capitol Grounds.
2

•HCON 348 IH

1 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on

2 September 21, 2002, or on such other date as the Speaker

3 of the House of Representatives and the Committee on

4 Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

5 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed

7 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police

8 Board, the event shall be—

9 (1) free of admission charge and open to the

10 public; and

11 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of

12 Congress.

13 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall

14 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities

15 incident to all activities associated with the event.

16 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

17 (a) STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.—Subject to the

18 approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the sponsor may

19 cause to be placed on the Capitol Grounds such stage,

20 seating, booths, sound amplification and video devices, and

21 other related structures and equipment as may be required

22 for the event, including equipment for the broadcast of

23 the event over radio, television, and other media outlets.

24 (b) ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS.—The Architect of

25 the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board may make any
3

•HCON 348 IH

1 additional arrangements as may be required to carry out

2 the event.

3 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

4 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce5 ment of the restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act

6 of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), con7 cerning sales, displays, advertisements, and solicitations

8 on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions appli9 cable to the Capitol Grounds in connection with the event.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**POLYPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.**

 

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Polypore International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended July 4, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, LynnAmos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

** **
| Date: August 7,  2009 | /s/ Lynn Amos           |
|----------------------------|-------------------------|
|                       | Lynn Amos               |
|                       | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hawk Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald E. Weinberg,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ RONALD E. WEINBERG
----------------------
Ronald E. Weinberg
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

February 24, 2003

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, subject
to the knowledge standarD contained in that statute, and not for any other
purpose.

                                       33
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 354

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia

Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 18, 2002

Mr. LATOURETTE (for himself and Mr. COSTELLO) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District

of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL

4 GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW

5 ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN.

6 On June 7, 2002, or on such other date as the Speak7 er of the House of Representatives and the Committee on

8 Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly des9 ignate, the 2002 District of Columbia Special Olympics

10 Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred
2

•HCON 354 IH

1 to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through the Capitol

2 Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics

3 torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics sum4 mer games at Gallaudet University in the District of Co5 lumbia.

6 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

7 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as

8 may be necessary to carry out the event.

9 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA10 TIONS.

11 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions

12 for physical preparations for the event.

13 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

14 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce15 ment of the restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act

16 of July 31, 1946 (40 U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), con17 cerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations

18 on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions appli19 cable to the Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 223 Agreed to House (ATH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 223

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a prayer vigil in 
  memory of those who lost their lives in the events of September 11, 
                                 2001.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

           September 12 (legislative day, September 11), 2001

Mr. Ney (for himself and Mr. Hoyer) submitted the following concurrent 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

           September 12 (legislative day, September 11), 2001

Committee on House Administration discharged; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a prayer vigil in 
  memory of those who lost their lives in the events of September 11, 
                                 2001.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used at any time on 
September 12, 2001, for a prayer vigil in memory of those who lost 
their lives in the events of September 11, 2001. Physical preparations 
for the vigil shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions 
as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-2296

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Alfonso R. Mosley

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Western

 ____________

 Submitted: October 3, 2022

Filed: October 6, 2022

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Alfonso R. Mosley appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised

release for the second time and sentenced him to 7 months in prison, with no

1The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for

the Southern District of Iowa.
additional supervised release to follow. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has

filed a brief challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentence. 

After reviewing the record under a deferential abuse-of-discretion standard, we

conclude the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. See

United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 917 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). The

sentence is below the statutory limits, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), and is

presumptively reasonable because it falls within the applicable policy statement range

in the United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual, see U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4(a); United

States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009). The district court sufficiently

considered the statutory sentencing factors and did not overlook a relevant factor,

give significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or commit a clear error of

judgment in weighing relevant factors. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e); Miller, 557 F.3d at

917; see also United States v. Clayton, 828 F.3d 654, 658 (8th Cir. 2016).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to

withdraw. 

______________________________

-2-