alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the District of Columbia. “Hogan Lovells” is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US

LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP, with offices in: Abu Dhabi Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Berlin Brussels Caracas Colorado Springs Denver

Dubai Dusseldorf Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston London Los Angeles Madrid Miami Milan Moscow Munich New York

Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Prague Rome San Francisco Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Ulaanbaatar Warsaw Washington DC Associated

offices: Budapest Jeddah Riyadh Zagreb. For more information see www.hoganlovells.com

\\DC - 039658/000001 - 3388123 v1

Hogan Lovells US LLP

Columbia Square

555 Thirteenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20004

T +1 202 637 5600

F +1 202 637 5910

www.hoganlovells.com

April 2, 2012

By Electronic Mail and Electronic Submission

Mr. Robert J. Finamore

Acting Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Applications of Joint Stock Company Aircompany "YAKUTIA" for (1) an Exemption

and a Foreign Air Carrier Permit and (2) a Statement of Authorization

(Dockets DOT-OST-2012-0047 and -0048)

Dear Mr. Finamore:

I am writing to inform the Department that all U.S. carriers served with the above-referenced

applications of Joint Stock Company Aircompany “Yakutia” dated March 27, 2012 have responded

with no objections to these applications.

Additionally, in further response to the information requirements of 14 C.F.R. §§ 211.20(h) and (t),

enclosed are executed OST Form 6411 and OST Form 4523, which have been submitted to the

Federal Aviation Administration and Docket DOT-OST-1995-236, respectively.

Respectfully submitted,

Sheryl R. Israel

Counsel for Joint Stock Company Aircompany “Yakutia”

sheryl.israel@hoganlovells.com

Direct Phone: +1 202 637 8898

Direct Fax: +1 866 728 1992

Enclosures

cc: Dockets DOT-OST-2012-0047 and -0048; brett.kruger@dot.gov; msinick@ssd.com;

carl.nelson@aa.com; sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com; jeff.morgan@delta.com;

dan.weiss@united.com; steve.morrissey@united.com; jonathan.linde@united.com;

howard_kass@usairways.com; ranjit.seth@evergeenairlines.com;

john.palo@evergreenairlines.com; anbird@fedex.com;

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com; enisson@nac.aero; william.s.schweizer@faa.gov;

patrick.crowley@faa.gov; herb.herzog@faa.gov; john.allen@faa.gov; 9-ATOR-HQ-RTREQ@faa.gov; urskr@state.gov; john.parrott@alaska.gov
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

January 7, 2015

Hon. Henry Garza

District Attorney

P. O. Box 540

Belton, TX 76513

Hon. Bob Odom

Assistant District Attorney

P. O. Box 540

Belton, TX 76513

Hon. John Kuchera

Attorney at Law

210 N. 6th Street

Waco, TX 76701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-13-00616-CR

Tr.Ct.No. 68115

Style: Michael Fitzgerald Reese v. The State of Texas

Appellant’s motion to withdraw attorney (Hon. John Kuchera) in the above cause 

was this day DENIED by this Court.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch
**Exhibit 32.2**

GMH COMMUNITIES TRUST

CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BYRULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, J.Patrick O’Grady, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of GMHCommunities Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the “Company”),hereby certify that, to my knowledge:

(1)           The Company’s periodic report onForm 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the “Form 10-Q/A”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)           The information contained in theForm 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

*        *        *
| /s/ J. Patrick O’Grady  |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| J. Patrick O’Grady      |
| Executive Vice  President    |
| and Chief  Financial Officer |
|                         |
|                         |
| Date: October 23,  2006      |

 

1

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1790

JOHN S. BADOH,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A95-546-815)

Submitted: March 27, 2006 Decided: April 19, 2006

 

Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sopo Ngwa, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Rod J.

Rosenstein, United States Attorney, John W. Sippel, Jr., Assistant

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

John S. Badoh, a native and citizen of Cameroon,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (Board) adopting and affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ)

order denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal,

and protection under the Convention Against Torture. Badoh

contends that his asylum application was timely filed and that he

established eligibility for that relief. As the IJ and Board

concluded that the asylum application was untimely, we find that

consideration of these claims is barred. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3)

(2000).

Badoh also challenges the finding that he failed to

qualify for withholding of removal. “To qualify for withholding of

removal, a petitioner must show that he faces a clear probability

of persecution because of his race, religion, nationality,

membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.”

Rusu v. INS, 296 F.3d 316, 324 n.13 (4th Cir. 2002) (citing INS v.

Stevic, 467 U.S. 407, 430 (1984)). Having conducted our review, we

conclude that substantial evidence supports the finding that Badoh

did not establish eligibility for withholding of removal.

We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Beauty Supply of
New Jersey Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carmine Catizone,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Carmine Catizone
-----------------------------
Carmine Catizone
Chief Executive Officer

November 4, 2009


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Beauty Supply of
New Jersey Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel Generelli,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Daniel Generelli
-----------------------------
Daniel Generelli
Chief Financial Officer

November 4, 2009
1.           I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
          period covered by this report on Form 10-K of BMW Vehicle Lease Trust 2021-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
  2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement
          of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under
          Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
  4.           I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the
          compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
          the servicing agreement in all material respects; and
 5.           All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
          related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
          included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
    
 BMW FINANCIAL SERVICES NA, LLCBy:
          /s/ Ole JensenName:
          Ole JensenTitle:
          Vice President – Finance & Chief Financial Officer
#### Charles HENDRIX v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 57840.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 3, 1988.

Ed W. Jenkins, Comer & Jenkins, Boone-ville, for appellant.

Edwin Lloyd Pittman and Mike Moore, Attys. Gen. by DeWitt Allred, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Prentiss County; Frank A. Russell, Judge.

Before ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., and ROBERTSON and SULLIVAN, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

HAWKINS and DAN M. LEE, P.JJ., PRATHER, ANDERSON, GRIFFIN and ZUCCARO, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 186 (Monday, September 26, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 59481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24637]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Fifty Eighth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 135, Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of Joint RTCA Special Committee 135: Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 135: Environmental Conditions and 
Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment

DATES: The meeting will be held October 20, 2011 from 9 a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street, 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC, 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (1) RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th 
Street, NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC, 20036; telephone (202) 833-
9339; fax (202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a RTCA Special Committee 135: Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment.
    The agenda will include:

Thursday, October 20, 2011

     9 a.m.-5 p.m.
     Chairmen's Opening Remarks, Introductions.
     Approval of Summary from Fifty-Seventh Meeting (RTCA Paper 
No. 166-11/SC 135-685).
     Review Approved Revised SC135 TOR (Terms of Reference)--
Environmental Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment--
(RTCA Paper No. 067-11/PMC-887).
     Review Proposed User's Guides.
     Review Working Group Activities.
     New or unfinished business.
     Establish Date for Next SC-135 Meeting.
     Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, September 19, 2011.
Robert L. Bostiga,
Manager, RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2011-24637 Filed 9-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
Exhibit 10.18


Cintas Corporation


Executive Compensation


Fiscal Year 2006


President & CEO


 


 


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Current FY ‘05

  	
   

  	
  FY ‘06 Target

  	
   

  	
  % Change

  
	
  I.

  	
  Base Pay:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Target Bonus Award:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Total Cash Comp:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


	
  II.

  	
  Bonus Formula

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  A.

  	
  37.5% Based on E.P.S. Increase

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  *Based on earnings per share increase over FY 2005

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  (FY 2005 Diluted E.P.S. = $1.74)

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  B.

  	
  37.5% Based on Sales Increase over FY 2005.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  C.

  	
  25% Based on Results of competitively sensitive Non-Financial Goals.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


 


 


	
  Signature:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  CINTAS CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
  Scott Farmer

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respect, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                     |         |         |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|--------------|
| /s/              Robert M. Blodgett                                                                                 |         |
| Name:              Robert M. BlodgettTitle:                Chief Financial OfficerDate: May                12, 2006 |    |    |
|                                                                                                                     |         |         |
|                                                                                                                     |              |
|                                                                                                                     |         |

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1759
DWIGHT C. BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TRITON SECURITY; MIKE FINGERHUT, PRESIDENT; JOY APPLEBY, VICE PRESIDENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-1544-1) Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: December 28, 2005 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dwight C. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Abbey Gail Hairston, Jessica Regan Hughes, SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Dwight C. Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motions for reconsideration and to “Subpoena Case and Employment Records.” This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Brown seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report ofDesign Source, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Peter Reichard, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 8th day of February, 2006.



| | /s/ Peter Reichard                                 
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Peter Reichard                                     
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer













---
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 257 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 257

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 15, 2001

     Received and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress that the men and women of the 
     United States Postal Service have done an outstanding job of 
 collecting, processing, sorting, and delivering the mail during this 
                      time of national emergency.

Whereas, on September 11, 2001, evil acts of terrorism were perpetrated against 
        the people of the United States and all humanity;
Whereas, in October 2001, reports of anthrax-tainted letters began to surface;
Whereas the United States Postal Service handles approximately 680,000,000 
        pieces of mail each day;
Whereas our Nation's postal and delivery sector accounts for approximately 8 
        percent of our gross national product;
Whereas, since September 11, 2001, the United States Postal Service has 
        delivered more than 20,000,000,000 pieces of mail;
Whereas 2 employees of the United States Postal Service have died as a result of 
        anthrax infection;
Whereas a number of employees of the United States Postal Service are being 
        treated for anthrax-like symptoms;
Whereas the more than 800,000 men and women who work for the United States 
        Postal Service have done an outstanding job of collecting, processing, 
        sorting, and delivering the mail during this time of national emergency; 
        and
Whereas the delivery of anthrax through the mail is an attempt to disrupt our 
        ability to communicate through the mail, and threatens the viability of 
        the postal system: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That--
            (1) it is the sense of the Congress that the men and women 
        of the United States Postal Service have done an outstanding 
        job of collecting, processing, sorting, and delivering the mail 
        during this time of national emergency; and
            (2) Congress will work with the United States Postal 
        Service to assure the safety and well-being of postal workers 
        as they carry out their duties and responsibilities, and of the 
        general public.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 14, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael H. McGEE.

No. 89-KH-2046.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 15, 1989.

In re McGee, Michael H.; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 89KW1369; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “6”, No. 270-709.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.