alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Richard A. BARD, Appellant, v. Cheryl R. BARD, Appellee.

No. 87-2474.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 2, 1988.

Ira F. Markowitz, North Miami, for appellant.

Frumkes and Greene and Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Pollack v. Pollack,*517 So.2d 707 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); *Gelman v. Gelman,*512 So.2d 236 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); *Gardner v. Gardner,*452 So.2d 981 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); *Urban v. Urban,*424 So.2d 22 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); *Rosen v. Rosen,*386 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); *Yan*
      *1000
      *kow v. Yankow,*357 So.2d 468 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Lauren Marie Hopfenspirger, Appellant

No. 06-23-00030-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 336th District Court of 

Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR-20-

27706). Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Justice van Cleef, Chief Justice Stevens 

and Justice Rambin participating. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed 

for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Lauren Marie Hopfenspirger, has adequately indicated her

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 29, 2023

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8031]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER12-1355-000]


Iron Energy LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Iron Energy LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an 
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is April 17, 2012.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0e484b5c4d41606267606b5d7b7e7e617c7a4e686b7c6d20696178"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="10565542535f7e7c797e75436560607f626450767562733e777f66">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: March 28, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8031 Filed 4-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      “Report”), I, Peter Stokes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge and belief:




(1) the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Peter
                StokesPeter
                Stokes
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              August
                7, 2008




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

RE : Teleconference between Dow AgroScience s (DAS) and EPA to Update EPA on the Current Status of the Physio logically Based Pharmacokinetic Model (PBPK) List of Documents 1. Meeting Summary Page 1 2. Meeting Attendees Page 1 3. DAS Talking Points for the Meeting Page 2 1. Meeting Summary On Wednesday, August 7 , 201 3 , EPA’s Office of Pesticide Programs met with Dow AgroSciences (DAS) via teleconference to get an update on DAS ’ PBPK model activities . DAS indicated that a third party review for validating the model was currently underway. They expect to have a complete version of model to submit to the Agency by the end of September 2013. They have alr eady submitted the oral and dermal components of the model to EPA. Only the inhalation portion is outstanding. 2. Meeting Attendees DAS attendees Mike Bartells, Dow Daland Juberg , Dow Paul Price, Dow Torka Poet, Battelle EPA attendees Anna Lowit, HED Jeff Dawson, HED Wade Britton, HED Chester Rodriguez, HED Mike Metzger, HED Tom Myers, PRD Joel Wolf, PRD

# Chlorpyrifos PBPK Model Projects 

# Dow AgroSciences August 7, 2013 Update Michael Bartels, Ph.D. - Dow Chemical Paul Price, Ph.D. - Dow Chemical 

# Torka Poet, Ph.D. - Battelle PNL

# • PBPK model for Chlorpyrifos (CPF)

– used to predict biomarkers of exposure: • CPF, CPF - oxon and trichloropyridinol (TCP)



# – and cholinesterase inhibition effects in: • plasma, RBC, brain



# – has been expanded to support: • human life - stages • CPF - oxon exposures 

# • multiple exposure routes 

# PBPK Model Applications

# • 1984/2002 Models -

– showed correlation between CPF/TCP levels and ChE inhibition in rats and humans 

# • 2009 -

– utilized model to design Comparative Cholinesterase assay

– published gestational model, providing tool to back - calculate CPF exposures from Columbia Univ epidemiology study data 

# • 2011 -

– proposed improved, chemical - specific safety factors for chlorpyrifos to EPA Science Advisory Panel 

# • 2013 -

– showed lack of ChE effects in RBC and brain following simulated exposures to Oxon in drinking water

– will issue finalized chemical - specific safety factors for CPF

– will derive Biomonitoring Equivalents value for CPF exposures 

# PBPK Model Applications

# PBPK Model Projects Timeline

# PBPK Model Projects Combined - Route model capabilities Applications of PBPK model, with data sources used for validation

# • August – September Timeline details

– Variation model completed - draft manuscript in preparation

– Chemical - specific safety Factors report draft by September 16 • for oral CPF exposures, but will be extended to Oxon



# – Inhalation model in development - status update by August 27 • will include CPF and Oxon



# – Model 3 rd 

# party validation in progress • Any EPA input on scope of validation ? 

# PBPK Model Applications - Miscellaneous
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Mary CAMBRIDGE, Appellee.

No. 87-824.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 15, 1988.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Henry H. Harnage, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and FERGUSON,. JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded on the authority of *Bloom v. McKnight,*502 So.2d 422 (Fla.1987).
Exhibit 10.2



 






Exhibit 10.2




CONTRACT CFO & ACCOUNTING, INC.




c/o 9974 Huntington Park Drive

Strongsville, OH 44136-2516

440-759-7470

440-238-8346 fax




David F. Hostelley, Ph D, CPA

Director of Public Entities Services

dave@hostelley.com



July 20, 2005



Mr. John A. Paganelli, Chairman

eXegenics, Inc.

1250 Pittsford-Victor Road

Building 200, Suite 280

Pittsford, NY 14534



Dear Mr. Paganelli:



This letter expresses our understanding of the services we will render and the fees for such
services. We will provide CFO type services as it relates to eXegenics, Inc. (the “Company”) In
this regard, we will work with the outsourced accounting staff in the preparation and review of the
Company’s annual and quarterly reports (Form 10-K’s and 10-Q’s) along with other standard public
company reporting documentation. We will work with legal counsel to the Company and others to
prepare the Company’s annual and quarterly reports and the filing of same with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. We will review the financial statements and related footnotes prepared by the
outsourced staff; the signing of these reports will be by David F. Hostelley, CPA, of our firm.



It is acknowledged and agreed that all services shall be performed solely by David F. Hostelley,
CPA and Mr. Hostelley shall serve as Chief Financial Officer of the Company. In the event Mr.
Hostelley is unable to perform the services set forth herein, this agreement shall terminate
immediately. We agree to treat all information relating to the Company and our services provided
hereunder as confidential.



Additionally, we will review the proposed merger candidate initial information and participate in
discussions and make recommendations. We will prepare all projections and forecasts and state our
assumptions in our report.



Our fees for these services will be $2,500 per month, billed and payable on the first of each
month. This agreement will be on a month to month basis with either party able to terminate the
agreement at will upon three business days notice.



Any travel on behalf of the Company for any reason will be billed separately at $800 per day plus
out-of-pocket expenses. All travel will be pre-approved by the Chairman of the Board of the
Company.



Any other services not anticipated by this letter will be discussed and payment terms will be
mutually agreed upon before services will be rendered.



We thank you for the opportunity to provide our services to you and we are looking forward to a
mutually beneficial relationship.



Please acknowledge your agreement with this understanding and fax a signed copy back to me.




22









 








	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Sincerely,	 	 	 	Agreed to:	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Contract CFO & Accounting, Inc.	 	 	 	eXegenics, Inc.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	 	 	 	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 

     David F. Hostelley, CPA
	 	 	 	 	 	 

     John A. Paganelli,
	 	 
	 

	 	     Director of Public Entities Services
	 	 	 	 	 	     Chairman of the Board	 	 






23
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Stephen J. Hawrysz, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Eagle Test Systems, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have: (c) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (d) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors:     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: February 1, 2008         /s/ Stephen J. Hawrysz     Stephen J. Hawrysz    *Chief Financial Officer*
No. 99-20221

-1-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-20221

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALDEMAR ANGUILO-GONZALEZ, also known as Carlos Ramon Fernandez,

also known as Chile, also known as Aldomar Angulo-Gonzalez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-98-CR-398-ALL

--------------------

February 16, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Represented by retained counsel, Aldomar Anguilo-Gonzalez

pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by an illegal alien and

possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and he was

sentenced to the lowest sentence recommended under the Sentencing

Guidelines. The Federal Public Defender, Anguilo-Gonzalez’s

counsel on appeal, argues that his conviction and sentence must

be vacated because the district court violated FED. R. CRIM.

P. 11(c)(3) by failing to advise Anguilo-Gonzalez that he had a

right to appointed counsel at trial if he could not afford a
No. 99-20221

-2-

retained attorney. Counsel does not otherwise challenge the

validity of Anguilo-Gonzalez’s conviction and sentence. 

Our review of the record convinces us that the district

court’s omission was not material to Anguilo-Gonzalez’s decision

to plead guilty. United States v. Johnson, 1 F.3d 296, 298 (5th

Cir. 1993) (en banc); see United States v. Caston, 615 F.2d 1111,

1115 (5th Cir. 1980). Vacating and remanding for a trial or a

new guilty plea would be an exercise in futility which could

easily result in a harsher sentence. Thus, the appeal is

frivolous and is dismissed. See United States v. Burleson, 22

F.3d 93, 95 (5th Cir. 1994); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
##### 



POLYPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polypore International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedure, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and the material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  August 16, 2005
    /s/    Lynn AmosLynn AmosChief Financial Officer
Polypore International, Inc. 32
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Allin Corpn. &  Richard W. Talarico



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This amendment is made and entered into as of this 7th day of July 2005 by and between Allin Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Employer”) and Richard W. Talarico (“Employee”), a resident of
Pennsylvania. 
  
 WHEREAS, Employer and Employee entered into an
employment agreement (the “Agreement”) as of January 10, 2002 and as amended on February 5, 2004 and December 8, 2004 and now desire to amend that Agreement by mutual consent. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements herein contained and intending to be legally bound
hereby the parties do hereby agree as follows: 
  
 Section 3(e)
of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated as follows: 
  
 (e) Stock Option Plan. Employee will be entitled to participate in Employer’s stock option plans. All options to purchase stock of Employer granted to Employee shall vest upon the earlier to occur of the date on
which (i) the termination of this Agreement without cause occurs, (ii) Employer sells all or substantially all of its assets, (iii) Employer merges with another entity in a transaction in which Employer is not the surviving corporation, or (iv) any
person (as that term is used in Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) other than the shareholders of Employer (as existing on January 1, 2001) becomes the Beneficial Owner (as that term is used
in Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act) directly or indirectly of 40% or more of the common stock of Employer (collectively, an event described in (ii), (iii) or (iv) is referred to as a “Change in Control”). Notwithstanding the foregoing,
vested options granted to Employee will be immediately forfeited, and will no longer be exercisable, upon the termination of the Employee for “cause,” as defined in Section 2. 
  
 In all other respects, the terms and conditions of the Agreement are ratified and confirmed. 
  

					
	 	 	ALLIN CORPORATION
			
	 	 	 	 	 /s/ Dean Praskach


	 	 	By:	 	Dean Praskach
			
	WITNESS:	 	 	 	 
			
	 /s/ Robert V. Fulton

	 	 	 	 /s/ Richard Talarico


	Robert V. Fulton	 	 	 	Richard Talarico, Chairman