alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 281

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 12, 2001

Received and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring the ultimate sacrifice made by Johnny Micheal

Spann, the first American killed in combat during the

war against terrorism in Afghanistan, and pledging continued support for members of the Armed Forces.

Whereas as part of the war against terrorism, United States

military personnel and agents from the Central Intelligence Agency were involved in combat with Taliban

forces during a prison uprising in Mazar-e Sharif, Afghanistan, on Sunday, November 25, 2001;

Whereas Johnny Micheal Spann, age 32, an officer in the

Central Intelligence Agency, was inside the prison
2

HCON 281 RFS

fortress interviewing Taliban prisoners when the uprising

began;

Whereas Spann was killed in this rebellion and is the first

American known to be killed in combat in Afghanistan

during this war;

Whereas Spann is the 79th employee of the Central Intelligence Agency killed in the line of duty;

Whereas the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency,

George J. Tenet, hailed Spann as an American hero and

will soon memorialize him on a wall of honor;

Whereas Spann, a former Captain in the Marine Corps, is

survived by his wife, Shannon, and 3 young children; and

Whereas the thoughts and prayers of the Congress and the

Nation remain with the families of Spann and all the soldiers fighting to ensure the Nation’s freedom and safety:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) honors Johnny Micheal Spann, a para4 military officer in the Central Intelligence Agency,

5 who was the first American killed in combat during

6 the war against terrorism in Afghanistan, and recog7 nizes him for his bravery and sacrifice;

8 (2) extends its deepest sympathies to the family

9 of this brave hero; and
3

HCON 281 RFS

1 (3) pledges its continued support for the men

2 and women who risk their lives every day to ensure

3 the safety of all United States citizens.

Passed the House of Representatives December 11,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Exhibit
21.1





Subsidiaries of the
Registrant





Name:  Ramtron
K.K.


Incorporated
in Japan


Doing
Business as:  Ramtron K.K.





Name:  Ramtron
LLC


Organized
in the State of Colorado


Doing
Business as:  Ramtron LLC





Name:  Ramtron
Canada Inc.


Incorporated
in Canada


Doing
Business as:  Ramtron Canada Inc.





Name:  Ramtron
Asia Limited


Incorporated
in Hong Kong and China


Doing
Business as:  Ramtron Asia Limited





Name:  Ramtron
Asia Pte. Ltd.


Incorporated
in Singapore


Doing
Business as:  Ramtron Asia Pte. Ltd





Name:  Ramtron
Asia Pte. Ltd. - Taiwan Branch


Incorporated
in Taiwan


Doing
Business as:  Ramtron Asia Pte. Ltd - Taiwan Branch





Name:  Ramtron
UK Limited


Incorporated
in United Kingdom


Doing
Business as:  Ramtron UK Limited
H. Con. Res. 387 Agreed to June 18, 2002

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas, founded in 1852, the American Society of Civil Engineers

is the Nation’s oldest national engineering society;

Whereas civil engineers work to constantly improve buildings, water

systems, and other civil engineering works through research,

demonstration projects, and the technical codes and standards

developed by the American Society of Civil Engineers;

Whereas the American Society of Civil Engineers incorporates educational, scientific, and charitable efforts to advance the science

of engineering, improve engineering education, maintain the

highest standards of excellence in the practice of civil engineering,

and ensure the public health, safety, and welfare;

Whereas the American Society of Civil Engineers represents the

profession primarily responsible for the design, construction, and

maintenance of the Nation’s roads, bridges, airports, railroads,

public buildings, mass transit systems, resource recovery systems,

water systems, waste disposal and treatment facilities, dams,

ports and waterways and other public facilities that are the

foundation on which the Nation’s economy stands and grows;

and

Whereas the Nation’s civil engineers, through innovation and the

highest professional standards in the practice of civil engineering,

protect the public health and safety and ensure the high quality

of life enjoyed by the Nation’s citizens: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the Congress—

(1) acknowledges the American Society of Civil Engineers

for its 150th Anniversary;

(2) commends the many achievements of the Nation’s civil

engineers; and
H. Con. Res. 387—2

(3) encourages the American Society of Civil Engineers

to continue its tradition of excellence in service to the profession

of civil engineering and to the public.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
[No. 32022-0-I.

Division One.

August 12, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. James Muntz, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 91-1-06443-8, Michael J. Fox, J., entered December 22, 1992. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Coleman, J., concurred in by Ellington and Moynihan, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 1665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2011-33209]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2012 / 
Notices

[[Page 1665]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

[Docket No. APHIS-2011-0111]

Notice of Request for Extension of Approval of an Information 
Collection; Importation of Baby Corn and Baby Carrots From Zambia

Correction

    In notice document 2011-33209 appearing on page 81467 in the issue 
of Wednesday, December 28, 2011 make the following correction:
    In the first column, second full paragraph, DATES: ``We will 
consider all comments we receive on or before December 28, 2011.'', 
should read ``We will consider all comments that we receive on or 
before February 27, 2012.''.

[FR Doc. C1-2011-33209 Filed 1-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
III

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 254

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 14, 2001

Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Encouraging the people of the United States to celebrate

the 300th anniversary of William Penn’s Charter of

Privileges, the 250th anniversary of the Liberty Bell,

and the 225th anniversary of the first public reading

of the Declaration of Independence.

Whereas William Penn was a distinguished statesman and a

principled defender of human rights and religious liberties;

Whereas in 1701, William Penn wrote Charter of Privileges,

which set a new standard for religious liberty that profoundly impacted the Nation’s history and still provides

an example for the world today;
2

HCON 254 RFS

Whereas religious freedom is still one of the most fragile liberties, and today, millions of people around the world are

persecuted for their religious beliefs;

Whereas the year 2001 marks the 300th anniversary of the

publication of Charter of Privileges;

Whereas the Liberty Bell was designed to commemorate the

50th anniversary of Charter of Privileges and is a powerful reminder of the Nation’s commitment to freedom and

justice;

Whereas the Liberty Bell became a defining symbol of the abolitionist movement, which sought to rid the Nation of

slavery;

Whereas the year 2001 marks the 250th anniversary of the

completion of the Liberty Bell; and

Whereas the year 2001 is also the 225th anniversary of the

first public reading of the Declaration of Independence,

which contains the immortal phrase: ‘‘We hold these

truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,

that they are endowed by their Creator with certain

unalienable Rights’’: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) encourages the people of the United States

4 to celebrate the 300th anniversary of William Penn’s

5 Charter of Privileges, the 250th anniversary of the

6 Liberty Bell, and the 225th anniversary of the first

7 public reading of the Declaration of Independence;

8 and
3

HCON 254 RFS

1 (2) encourages the Nation’s leaders to reaffirm

2 their commitment to promoting human rights and

3 religious freedom in the Nation and around the

4 world.

Passed the House of Representatives November 13,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
#### Leroy YOUNG v. Dorothy S. JOHNSON, et al.

No. 86-CC-1103.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 1, 1986.

In re Young, Leroy; applying for supervisory writs and other remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 295-857; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW-86-0499.

Denied.
~ XtremeAir GmbH, Harzstr.2, D-39444 Hecklingen SB-2013-008 

Tel: +49 39267 60999 0, Fax: +49 39267 60999 20 

www.xtremeair.de Ausgabe: A.03 info@xtremeair.de 

DOA-Nr.: EASA.21J.360 Service Bulletin SB-201 3-008 Date: 25.10.2013 

MANDATORY 

Subject: Engine Mount 

Aircraft model affected: XA42, XA41 

Serial numbers affected: All aircraft are affected up to (and including) serial numbers 07 for XA41 and 

123 for XA42. 

Background: A crack was reported by an operator in a weld seam between the lower left 

landing gear attachment bearing and the lower engine mount to firewall 

attachment-plate. Further investigation showed that all engine mounts from a 

specific supplier may be affected. 

Classification: Priority 1 - Safety 

Compliance: Inspection mandatory every 10 flights. 

Replacement of engine mount before next aerobatic flight. 

Material: Engine Mount XA42-7120-151 up to (and including) manufacturer's serial 

number 036 

Weight and Balance: n.a. 

Accomplishment instructions: All aerobatic flights are prohibited until replacement of the engine mount. 

Inspection: 

1. Remove the engine cowling. 

2. Visually inspect all engine mount welds for cracks. 

Note: Particularly the welds between the lower landing gear attachment 

bearing and the lower engine mount to firewall attachment-plate are 

susceptible to cracking in aircraft operated regularly from rough airfields. 

Figure 1 and 2. 

3. When in doubt, perform a dye penetrant inspection, refer to AC 43.13-

1B. 

4. If cracks are found, replace the engine mount before next flight. 

5. Reinstall the engine cowling. 

6. Repeat the above inspection after every 10 flights. 

Terminating action: 

1. Replace the affected engine mount with Engine Mount PIN 

XA42-7120-151 provided by XtremeAir. 

Note: XtremeAir will provide free of charge one new Engine Mount P/N 

XA42-7120-151 with the latest amendment to each operator of an 

affected aircraft. 

2. Advise XtremeAir (airworthiness@xtremeair.de), about the 

accomplishment of this task, stating the aircraft serial number, and 

return the old engine mount to XtremeAir. 

Replaces Service Bulletin No. I Date: SB-2013-008 A.02 27-09-2013 

Page 1 /3 
DOA-N

~ 

r.: EASA.21 J.360 

Approval: 

XtremeAir GmbH, Harzstr.2, D-39444 Hecklingen SB-2013-008 

Tel: +49 39267 60999 0, Fax: +49 39267 60999 20 Ausgabe: A.03 www.xtremealr.de info@xtremealr.de 

Service Bulletin SB-2013-008 Date: 25.10.2013 

The technical information contained in this document has been approved 

under the authority of Design Organisation EASA.21J.360. 

Fi:,:urc I : \\'<'ldin:.: S('arm an·a "lrcr·c ~lra all crrl iorr i,; rrccrlcrlrluring ins pcclinn 

Replaces Service Bulletin No. I Date: SB-2013-008 A.02 27-09-2013 

Page 2 /3 
~ XtremeAir GmbH, Harzstr.2, D-39444 Hecklingen SB-2013-008 

Tel: +49 39267 60999 0, Fax: +49 39267 60999 20 Ausgabe: A.03 www.xtremealr.de info@xtremealr.de 

DOA-Nr.: EASA.21J.360 Service Bulletin SB-2013-008 Date: 25.10.2013 

l"iJ.:urc 2: \\ elding scanh area'' here C\tra attention;, needed durin!! in,pcction 

Replaces SeNice Bulletin No. I Date: SB-2013-008 A.02 27-09-2013 

Page 3/3
#### Robb NEIDER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STATE of Utah, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, and Jordan Excavating Company, Inc., a corporation, Defendants and Respondents.

No. 18463.

Supreme Court of Utah.

June 10, 1983.

Anthony M. Thurber, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellant.

David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Stephen J. Sorenson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leonard J. Russon, Salt Lake City, for defendants and respondents.

HALL, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained as the result of negligence on the part of both defendants. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant State of Utah only, and plaintiff appeals.

Appeals may be taken to this Court from all final orders and judgments.1 However, in the instant case, the summary judgment in favor of defendant State of Utah alone did not constitute a final order of judgment because the action against the remaining defendant Jordan Excavating Company, Inc., remains alive.2

Although the issue of jurisdiction was not raised by the parties, we are obliged to do so, *sua spoil te,*
      *3*
      **and we therefore do not reach the merits of the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed. No costs awarded.

STEWART, HOWE, OAKS and DURHAM, JJ., concur.

. Rule 72(a), Utah R.Civ.P.

. *Kennedy v. New Industries, Inc.,*Utah, 600 P.2d 534 *(1979); South Shores Concession v. State,*Utah, 600 P.2d 550 (1979); *Salt Lake City Corporation v. Layton,*Utah, 600 P.2d 538 (1979).

*. Kennedy v. New Industries, Inc., supra*n. 2.
**Exhibit31.2**

** **

BG FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

CERTIFICATION - CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER

I, T. Don Waddell,certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BGFinancial Group, Inc.

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

                a)             Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

a)             Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

                c)             Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors:

                a)             Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)            Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 16, 2005 |   | Signature:  | /s/ T. Don Waddell      |
|-------------------------|--------|------------------|-------------------------|
|                    |   |             | T. Don Waddell          |
|                    |   |             | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. RONALD CASTANON,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 19

- 16224

D.C. No s

. 1:17

- cv
- 00252

- DAD

1:96

- cr
- 05272

- DAD

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 19, 2022 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Federal prisoner Ronald Castanon appeals from the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C § 2253. Reviewing de novo, see United States v. Reves , 774 F.3d 562, 564 (9th Cir. 2014), we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 28 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 16224

Castanon contends that the district court erred by denying his § 2255 motion as untimely. He asserts that his motion is timely because he filed it within one year of the Supreme Court decision in Johnson v. Unite d States , 57 6 U.S. 591 (2015). However, Castanon’s argument that Johnson applie s to the mandatory career

offender G uideline under which he was sentenced is foreclosed

. See United States

v. Blackstone , 903 F.3d 1020, 1028 (9th Cir. 2018) (“ Johnson did not recognize a new right applicable to the mandatory Sentencing Guidelines on collateral

re view

. ”)

. Contrary to Castanon’s argument, our decision in Blackstone is not “clearly irreconcilable” with United States v. Davis , 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019 ). See

Miller v. Gammie , 335 F.3d 889, 900 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). Accordingly, the district court properly concluded that § 2255(f)(3) does not apply and Castanon’s

motion i s untimely. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(1).

We treat Castanon ’s additional argum ents as a motion to expand the certificate of appealability. So treated, the motion is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 22

- 1(e); Hiivala v. Wood , 195 F.3d 1098, 1104

- 05 (9th Cir. 1999)

. AFFIRMED.
#### Dal STEER and Jose Zuniga, Appellants, v. EMPACADORA DEL NORTE, S.A., Appellee.

No. 87-785.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 5, 1988.

Rehearing Denied May 11, 1988.

Brett Rivkind and Charles Lipcon, Miami, for appellants.

Kelley Drye & Warren including Smath-ers & Thompson and Brooks C. Miller, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Armadora Naval Dominicana, S.A. v. Garda,*478 So.2d 873 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 380 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 380

  Approving the placement of 2 paintings in the Senate reception room.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           October 19 (legislative date, September 22), 2000

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Approving the placement of 2 paintings in the Senate reception room.

Whereas Senate Resolution 241, 106th Congress, directed the Senate Commission on 
        Art to select 2 outstanding individuals whose paintings shall be placed 
        in 2 of the remaining unfilled spaces in the Senate reception room, upon 
        approval by the Senate; and
Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Senate Resolution 241, the 
        Commission has selected Senator Arthur H. Vandenberg and Senator Robert 
        F. Wagner, and recommends such names to the Senate: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate Commission on Art (referred to in this 
resolution as the ``Commission'') shall procure appropriate paintings 
of Senator Arthur H. Vandenberg and Senator Robert F. Wagner and place 
such paintings in the 2 unfilled spaces on the south wall of the Senate 
reception room.
    Sec. 2. (a) The paintings shall be rendered in oil on canvas and 
shall be consistent in style and manner with the paintings of Senators 
Clay, Calhoun, Webster, LaFollette, and Taft now displayed in the 
Senate reception room.
    (b) The paintings may be procured through purchase, acceptance as a 
gift of appropriate existing paintings, or through the execution of 
appropriate paintings by a qualified artist or artists to be selected 
and contracted by the Commission.
    Sec. 3. The expenses of the Commission in carrying out this 
resolution shall be paid out of the contingent fund of the Senate on 
vouchers signed by the Secretary of the Senate and approved by the 
Committee on Rules and Administration.
                                 <all>
```