alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 119 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 119

 Expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to the right of all 
 Americans to keep and bear arms in defense of life or liberty and in 
             the pursuit of all other legitimate endeavors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2001

  Mr. Crane submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to the right of all 
 Americans to keep and bear arms in defense of life or liberty and in 
             the pursuit of all other legitimate endeavors.

Whereas the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States conveys an 
        inalienable right to all American citizens, such right occupying the 
        same preferred position as all other constitutional rights;
Whereas unconscionable abridgements of the second amendment have been undertaken 
        over the years by State and local governmental bodies, and have been 
        allowed by the courts to stand uncorrected; and
Whereas the Framers of the second amendment to the Constitution and those who 
        ratified the second amendment intended that the individual retain the 
        right to keep and bear arms in order to protect life, liberty, and 
        property and to protect our Nation from those who would attempt to 
        destroy our freedom: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the Constitution provides 
that all individual citizens have the right to keep and bear arms, 
which right supersedes the power and authority of any government.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 134 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 134

   Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Book 
                               Festival.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2001

Mr. LaTourette submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Book 
                               Festival.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL BOOK FESTIVAL.

    The Library of Congress (in this resolution referred to as the 
``sponsor''), in cooperation with the First Lady, shall be permitted to 
sponsor a public event, the National Book Festival (in this resolution 
referred to as the ``event''), on the Capitol Grounds on September 8, 
2001, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the 
Senate may jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--The event shall be free of admission charge to the 
public and arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress, under 
conditions to be prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol and the 
Capitol Police Board.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    (a) Structures and Equipment.--Subject to the approval of the 
Architect of the Capitol, the sponsor may cause to be placed on the 
Capitol Grounds such stage, seating, booths, sound amplification and 
video devices, and other related structures and equipment as may be 
required for the event, including equipment for the broadcast of the 
event over radio, television, and other media outlets.
    (b) Additional Arrangements.--The Architect of the Capitol and the 
Capitol Police Board are authorized to make any such additional 
arrangements as may be required to carry out the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946 (40 
U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, advertisements, displays, 
and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions 
applicable to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.2(b)


 Schedule of Secured Convertible Notes (refinancings) Issued by NCT Group, Inc.
              to Carole Salkind and Outstanding as of June 30, 2005



                                                                 Conversion
   Issue Date         Due Date            Principal                Price
   ----------         --------        ----------------             -----
    12/22/04          06/22/05        $  13,933,584.56            $0.0166
    12/31/04          06/30/05            8,968,594.32            $0.0180
    01/26/05          07/26/05           11,291,006.31            $0.0172
    02/09/05          08/09/05           15,986,793.78            $0.0180
    02/21/05          08/21/05              457,761.83            $0.0195
    03/11/05          09/11/05              457,201.55            $0.0180
    03/23/05          09/23/05            2,001,439.22            $0.0183
    04/14/05          10/14/05              457,970.18            $0.0130
    04/29/05          10/29/05            1,034,532.52            $0.0120
    05/18/05          11/18/05              485,934.02            $0.0123
    06/10/05          12/10/05            1,465,534.55            $0.0100
                                    --------------------
                                     $   56,540,352.84
                                    ====================
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 409 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 409

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Community Role Models Week, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2002

 Mr. Knollenberg submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the goals and ideals of National Community Role Models Week, 
                        and for other purposes.

Whereas individuals who are motivated every day by traditional American values 
        such as selflessness, compassion, dedication, courage, and integrity 
        have a positive effect on society by encouraging others to act in a 
        similar manner;
Whereas individuals in local communities located throughout the United States 
        embody these values in their daily work, communities, and homes;
Whereas children and adults would benefit from learning about individuals in 
        their community who embody these values and about what motivates them;
Whereas because children learn and act by examples they experience on a daily 
        basis, they need role models from their local community with whom they 
        can realistically relate;
Whereas inspiring stories about an individual that a child knows or might meet 
        in the community can make a difference in that child's decisions and 
        life;
Whereas the Recognizing Achievement--Rewarding Excellence Foundation (R.A.R.E. 
        Foundation) based in Troy, Michigan, has established a program to 
        recognize exceptional people who work in the community and further 
        educate children in the community about such people;
Whereas the R.A.R.E. Foundation is willing to provide guidance to any community 
        interested in starting such a program; and
Whereas National Community Role Models Week is a fitting tribute to the many 
        individuals who displayed motivation, selflessness, compassion, 
        dedication, courage, and integrity during the aftermath of the terrorist 
        attacks against the United States which occurred on September 11, 2001: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Community 
        Role Models Week;
            (2) commends the Recognizing Achievement--Rewarding 
        Excellence Foundation based in Troy, Michigan, for establishing 
        a program to recognize exceptional people who work in the 
        community and further educate children in the community about 
        such people; and
            (3) encourages the establishment of similar programs in 
        communities throughout the United States.
                                 <all>
```
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 8- 00 92 4- CV IN THE I NT ER EST OF R. S. , a Chi ld Fr om the 131st J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-PA-00023 Honora ble Charles Montemay or, Judge Pre siding Opinion by : Marialy

n Ba rnar d, J ustice Sitt ing: Kar en Ang elini, J ustice

Sandee B ry an Mar ion, J ustice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: May 20, 2009 AFF I RMED After the trial court terminated her pare ntal rig hts, H iwaunis S. a ppeale d the trial co u rt ’s order deter mining that an a

ppeal of the termination orde r would be f rivolous. See T EX . F AM . C ODE ANN . § 263.405(g ) (Ve rnon 2002). Hiwa unis ’s co urt-appointed a

ppellate a ttorney filed a br ief
c on ta ini ng a

pr of e ssi on a l e va luatio n o f t

he re c or d a

nd de mon str a tin g that th ere a re no a rg ua ble g rounds to be adva

nced. Counsel c oncludes that the a ppeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the re quirements of An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). S e e I n re R.R. , No. 04-03-00096- CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at * 4 (Te x . App.—San Antonio May 21, 20 0 3 , no pet.) (a p p l y i n g An de rs pr oc e du re in a pp e a l f ro m te rm inatio n o f p a re nta l r ig hts ) ( me m. o p. ); se e als o In re K.M. , 98 S.W .3d 774 (Tex. App.—For t Worth 2003, order) ( same).04
- 08
- 00 92 4- CV

- 2- Counsel cer

tified that a c opy

of his brief w as deliver ed to Hiwaunis who was advised of her rig ht to ex amine the r ecor d and to file a pro se brief. N o pro se brief has been f iled. After

revie wing the re cord, w e ag ree that the appe al is frivolous and without merit. The judg ment of the trial c ourt is theref ore a ffirme d, and counse l’s motion to wit hdrawis gr anted.
Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice
#### Callie Hall Holton, Plaintiff in Error, v. S. J. Patterson and her Husband, N. J. Patterson, Defendants in Error.

Judgment affirmed upon the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. Mc.Olung, 47 Fla,......77 South Rep. 51 ; Commercial Bank v. Towers, 4 7 Fla.......77 South Rep. 742.

This ease was decided by the Court En Banc.

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Hamilton County, •

*179
      *M. F. Horne,*for Plaintiff in Error.

*Johnson d Johnson,*for Defendants in Error.

Per Curiam.

In this cause the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Shackleford and Mi*. Justice Carter are of opinion that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Taylor, Mr. Justice IIocker and Mr. Justice Cockrell are of opinion that it should be reversed. Under these circumstances, upon the authority of State *ex rel.*Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. ..... 37 South. Rep. 51, and Commercial Bank v. Towers, 48 Fla. .... 37 South. Rep. 742, an order will be entered affirming the judgment from which the writ of error was taken.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Mueller Holdings (N.A.), Inc. (the“Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 26, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Darrell M. Jean, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15)d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  Darrell M. Jean                        |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                        |
|   |                                        |
|   | Darrell  M. Jean                            |
|   | Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been providedto Mueller Holdings (N.A.), Inc. and will be retained by Mueller Holdings(N.A.), Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission and itsstaff upon request.

 

----
[No. 34436-6-I.

Division One.

July 29, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. David D. Sykes, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 93-1-05206-1, Harriett M. Cody, J., entered April 11, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Coleman, J., concurred in by Webster and Ellington, JJ.
#### Continental Securities Company et al., as Stockholders of the Michigan Central Railroad Company, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Stockholders, Appellants, *v.*The Michigan Central Railroad Company et al., Respondents.

*Continental Securities Co.*v. *Michigan Central R. R. Co.,*160 App. Div. 127, affirmed.

(Argued January 13, 1916;

decided January 25, 1916.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 24, 1914, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at Special Term on a motion for judgment on the pleadings as amended at the trial. The action is brought by the plaintiffs as stockholders of the Michigan Central Railroad Company, praying judgment that the agreement known as the “New York Central Lines Equipment Trust of 1913 ” and all leases of equipment executed and all trust certificates issued pursuant to the terms of such agreement be declared invalid, null, void and of no effect and be canceled, and that the defendants be enjoined from carrying out the agreement and any leases executed thereunder and from executing any further leases. or delivering any further equipment or making any further payments or issuing any further equipment trust certificates thereunder.

*Elijah N. Joline*and *William Alban Ulman*for appellants.

*Albert H. Harris, Thomas Emery*and *Alexander S. Lyman*for Michigan Central Railroad Company et al., respondents.

*Charles Howland Russell*for Guaranty Trust Company of New York, respondent.

*618
      *Per Curiam.*

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs to each party appearing and filing a separate brief, on the opinion in *Venner*v. *N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co.*(217 N. Y. 615), decided herewith.

Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.
New Heights Aerial Media

David L . Farley 2400 Amara Dr Toledo, OH 43617 (419)754
- 7236 dfarley @newheightsaerialmedia.com Date: April 2 0 , 2015 U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management Sy stem 1200 New Jersey

Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 Addendum Request to Exemption No. 11358 To Whom It May

Concern: New Heights Aerial Media requests that the 3d Robotics Iris+ UAS be added to Exemption No. 11358 and COA No. FAA
- 2014
- 1110
- 333E
. The Iris+ gross weight is approxim ately 5.5lbs. with batte ry

and payload. The pay load will be a camera gimble and an HD Camera. The Iris+ has a preset GeoFence that will not allow the aircraft to fl y out of. The Presets are 200ft AGL altitude and a distance horizontally of 400ft. In the event of signal loss fr om the ground controller, the aircraft will return to its takeoff point if the aircraft has a good GPS L ock. If there is no GPS lock, the aircraft will land at its present position. Attached is the Owner's Manual and Checklist. The Iris+ will be operate d within the parameters set forth b y Exemption No: 11358 and COA No. FAA
- 2014
- 1110
- 333E unless an additional COA is issued for the Iris+ Thank You for your Consideration David Farley New Heights Aerial Media
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7282

KUNTA KENTA REDD , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. JAMES C. DEVER, III, United States Federal Sentencing Judge; ROBERT J. DODSON, United States District Attorney; MICHAEL JAMES, United States District Attorney; TIMOTHY M. SEVERO, United States District Attorney , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W . Flanagan, District Judge. ( 5:19

- ct

- 03395

- FL )

Submitted : November 19, 2020 Decided: November 24, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KING, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Kunta Kenta Redd , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Kunta Kenta Redd appeals from the district court’s order dismissing under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) his civil action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed

. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The court determined
that Redd’s claims were barred in their entirety by the applicable statute of limitations.
The court also determined that Redd’s c laims were barred by judicial and prosecutorial immunity, barred under Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477 (1994), and sought barred or
unavailable remedies. On appeal, * we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Redd’s informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important docu ment; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We deny Redd’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conte ntions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

* Although the district court dismissed Redd’s action without prejudice, we conclude after review of the record in light of Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC , 959 F.3d 605, 610

- 12, 614

- 15 (4th Cir. 2020), that the dismissal is final and appealable.
Sl()-1()()3()4-()41 

ObFAIRPORT 

ROGE R MILLIKE N FIEL D 

I=ebruai7 24, 2010 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Docket DOT-OST-2010-0034 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

Thank you for the opportunity to express my support for the application for antitrust Immunity 

and proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan Airlines. The 

proposed alliance between these two airlines Is vital for the oneworld alliance to compete 

effectively with the Star and SkyTeam alliances. This Increased alliance competition will in turn 

enhance the benefits of the Department's Open Skies policy - first by solidifying U.S. - Japan 

Open Skies, then by serving as a foundation for fijrtiier liberalization across Asia. 

After a thorough review, I encourage the Department of Transportation to approve this 

application as it would enable these oneworld alliance airlines to work closely together to 

deliver highly competitive air transportation services. Approval for AA/JAL alliance will have a 

positive Impact on air travel by offering customers more service, scheduling and pricing options 

and will help to ensure that customers continue to benefit from the competi'tion afforded by 

three competitive air alliances. 

I urge you to quickly approve this application. 

Sincerely, 

/ 

David N. Edwarels, Jr., A.A.E. 

Executive Director 

Greenville-Spartanburg Airport Commission 

2000 GSP Drive • Suite 1 • Greer, South Carolina 29651 * Greenville 864-877-7426 • Spartanburg 864-439-4476 • Fax 864-848-6225 

Roger Milliken,Cha(mion Leiand Burch Valerie J.S. Miller Heniy A. Ramella Minor M.Shaw Wallace Storey Oovid N. Edwards, Jr., A AE. , Btecutrve Oi'recfor 

www.gspairport.com
EXHIBIT 32.1





Section 1350 Certification
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Symmetry Medical Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), does hereby certify that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter and three months ended April 3, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





May 6, 2011


/s/ Thomas J. SullivanThomas J. SullivanChief Executive Officer/s/ Fred L. HiteFred L. HiteChief Financial Officer