alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF VULCAN
INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.  THIS INFORMATION IS SUMMARIZED FROM THE
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10K FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000848446
<NAME> VULCAN INTERNATIONAL
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,254,138
<SECURITIES>                                48,779,606
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,773,332
<ALLOWANCES>                                   282,847
<INVENTORY>                                    633,995
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,500,783
<PP&E>                                      15,667,654
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,711,997
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,848,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,865,043
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     66,060
<COMMON>                                       249,939
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,632,760
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,848,623
<SALES>                                     15,459,546
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,087,469
<CGS>                                       14,136,851
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,136,851
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                60,895
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             130,711
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,497,481
<INCOME-TAX>                                   539,129
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,958,352
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,958,352
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.63
        

</TABLE>
#### Nancy F. HOLT, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Verner Walker HOLT, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 17805.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Sept. 24, 1982.

*678Frank M. Wells, Ogden, for defendant and appellant.

Dale M. Dorius, Brigham City, for plaintiff and respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a divorce decree that awarded the plaintiff alimony in the amount of $400 per month for four years, plus $200 per month for the two years following.

The parties were married eleven years and had one son, age five at the time of the divorce. Plaintiff was awarded custody and $175 per month for his support. This award is not challenged on appeal.

The plaintiff and defendant were indebted heavily with unsecured obligations and a number of secured joint-obligations. One of the defendant’s debts was to a local bank for $25,000 where plaintiff’s father, Mr. Fishburn, had co-signed with defendant on a note.

The defendant filed as a bankrupt and obtained a discharge, which relieved him of the obligation to the bank, and left Fish-burn as sole obligor therefor. Plaintiff refused to file bankruptcy and chose to face the joint-obligations she had with the defendant alone.

During the hearing, Fishburn testified (over the objection of inadmissibility) as to the details of the note, including the amount, the payee and the two makers.

On appeal, the defendant attaches considerable significance to the fact that the amount of alimony awarded suggests an amount near enough to the $25,000 debt owed by defendant to her father and which was discharged in bankruptcy, that it was awarded by the court so that the plaintiff could recoup and repay her father’s loss.

While we have concluded that it was error to allow plaintiff’s father to testify as to the amount of his joint-obligation with the defendant (that being irrelevant to the issue before the court), it is unclear whether the district court relied on that evidence in fixing the amount of alimony. If the court did not rely on that evidence, the error was harmless.1 Since it is possible, however, that the court did rely on Fishburn’s testimony, the case is remanded to the district court for a redetermination of alimony. In making its discretionary award,2 the court should consider, *inter alia,*plaintiff’s concession that $275.00 per month would satisfy her needs.

The alimony award is vacated and the case is remanded for a redetermination of alimony.

1

. Rule 61, Utah Rules of Civil Procedure.

2

. See *Gramme*v. *Gramme,*Utah, 587 P.2d 144 (1978).
[No. 34675-0-I.

Division One.

June 17, 1996.]

#### Bill Gardiner, *Appellant,*v. John Rasmussen, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Skag-it County, No. 92-2-00180-5, David A. Nichols, J., entered May 10, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
[No. 18253-0-II.

Division Two.

August 16, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Charles M. Dawkins, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grays Harbor County, No. 94-1-00049-0, David E. Foscue, J., entered May 16, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Houghton, A.C.J., and Turner, J.
### ' " E^ARTMEN T O P ^ " ^ •.:^'vE T OPERATION S ' ^

A / RL ; i

V E 5 September

13 , 201 0

Denni s J
. DeVany Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s US Department

o f Transportatio n 40 0 Sevent

h Street , S.W
. Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 SkyWes t Airline s Essential Ai r

Servic e Proposal fo

r Imperial , California
. Dea r Mr
. DeVany : Attache di s th e SkyWes t

Airline s proposal fo

r continue dservic e t o Imperial , California
. Ou r proposal i s t

o provid e tw o direc t

roun dtrip s dail y (1 3 roun dtrip s pe r week ) t o Lo s Angeles , Californi a(LAX ) wit h n o intermediat e stop s or aircraf t flo w fro mother cities
. Pleas e note tha

t thi s i s differen

t tha n ou r curren t servic e pattern whic h consist s o f bot h non-sto p an done-sto p flight s to LAX
. A sampl e schedul e i s als o attached
. Servic e wil l b e provide dwit

h th e Embraer

Brasili a(EMB-120 ) 30-sea t turbopro p aircraft
. Th e proposal perio di s fo

r Januar y 1 , 201 1 t o December

31 , 2012
. Thes e flight s wil l b e operate da s Unite dExpress , pursuan t t o acode-sharin g agreemen t wit h Unite dAirlines , an dwil l provid e connection s in Lo s Angele s to th e nationa l transportatio n system . SkyWes t welcome s th e opportunity t o continu e to provid e reliabl e servic e if selected
. Thank yo u fo r your consideration
. Sincerely , 

## f c Michae l Thompso n Vic e Presiden t

- Marke t Developmen t SkyWes t Airline sSampl e schedul e fo r IPL-LAX : To : LO S ANGELE S INTL From : LO S ANGELE S INTL De p Ar r Fre q Dep Ai r Fre q 08:4 0 09:4 8 123456 7 07:2 5 08:2 5 123456 7 20:3 2 21:4 0 1234 5 7 19:0 5 20:0 5 1234 5 7SkyWes t Airline s

Imperia l 10-Sep-l O

Numbe ro f round-trip s pe rwee k Aircraf t Typ e - Embrae rBrasili a Passenge rRevenu e Passengers Averag e Far e Revenu e Bloc k Tim e Tri p blocl < tim e - IVIinute s Tota l schedule d bloc k tim e Tota l complete d bloc k tim e RPIVI S Passenger s Stag e Lengt h
ASM S Schedule d Departure s Compete d Departure s Stag e lengt h Availabl e Seat s 2011-201 2 Imperia l Lo s Angele s 1 3

98 % 

### s $ 10,50 0

76.5 0 803,25 0
6 4 1,44 2 1,41 3
10,50 0 18 2

98 % 1,911,00 0

1,35 2 1,32 5 18 2 3 0 7,381,92 0
Revenu e Direc t Operatin g Expense s Fligh t attendan t RP M relate d Departur e relate d AS M relate d
Operatin g incom e (loss ) 5 % profi t margi n Subsid y requiremen t SkyWes t effectiv e rate s pe runi t Pe rtri p Pe rpassenge r SkyWes t cos t pe rbloc k hou r Effectiv e Subsid y rat e pe runi t Pe rtri p Pe rpassenge r SkyWes t cos t pe rbloc k hou r Loa d facto r Averag e fue l cos t pe rgallo n 803,25 0 BIkH rS 1,153.1 9 BI k H r$ 34.4 9 RPM S S 0.0 1 Departure s S 408.4 6 ASM S S 0.0 4 

### s

s $ 

### s s s s s s $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,629,78 9

48,74 3 24,14 3 541,19 8 285,02 2 2,528,89 6 (1,725,646 ) 126,44 5 1,852,09 1
1,90 9 24 1 1,78 9
1,39 8 17 6 1,78 9 26 % 2.7 5
In The Matter Of: 

COMAIR, INC. 

Respondent 

SERVED: OCTOBER 1, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0319 

Case No. 2011S0271013 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On August 14, 2014, an Order Setting Rule 16litigation Scheduling Conference and 

Directing Rule 26(f) Planning and Submission was filed. This Order set the Rule 16 Litigation 

Scheduling Conference for October 8, 2014, at 11 :00 a.m. Eastern time, and set October 1, 2014, 

as the deadline for filing a proposed scheduling/discovery plan. 

On September 30,2014, the Respondent filed a Withdrawal ofRequest for Hearing and 

Answer, stating that the parties have reached a settlement and requesting that this proceeding be 

dismissed with prejudice. 

After having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, 

statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The October 1, 2014 deadline for filing a proposed scheduling/discovery plan is 

cancelled. 

2. The Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference set for October 8, 2014, at 11:00 a.m. 

Eastern time is cancelled. 

3. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, the Respondent has withdrawn its Request for Hearing, 

and this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

Attachment: Service List 

·.: ~_. 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Mr. Christopher R. Stevenson 

Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ASO-7 

ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration, Southern Region 

1701 Columbia A venue 

College Park, GA 30337 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

Mr. Robert P. Silverberg 

Respondent's Counsel 

1101 30th Street, N.W. Suite 120 

Washington, DC 20007 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0319 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                     Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

I, Harmon H. Hardy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Stelax Industries, Ltd.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure control and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d--15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

     a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
            disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my
            supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
            registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
            to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

     b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
            and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of
            the end of the period covered by this report based upon such
            evaluation; and

     c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
            control over financial reporting that occurred during the
            registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or
            is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
            control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
            reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.



Date:    January 13, 2006              By: /s/ Harmon H. Hardy
         ----------------              --------------------------------
                                       Harmon H. Hardy
                                       Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Chief Financial Officer



<PAGE>
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45291

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff

- Respondent

,

v.

EDDIE DEAN TACKETT

,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Filed: August 29, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho,

Kootenai County. Hon. Scott Wayman , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and suspended, unified sentence of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years, for possession of a controlled substance with the intent to deliver, affirmed

.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; HUSKEY, Judge; and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Eddie Dean Tackett was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance with the

intent to deliver , Idaho Code § 37

- 2732(a)(1)(A) . The district court imposed a unified sentence

of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years , suspended the sentence and

placed Tackett on supervised p robation. Tackett appeals, contending that his sentence is

excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well esta blished and2 need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Tackett ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-2480EA

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Arkansas.

*

Alvin J. Johnson, also known as Albert * [UNPUBLISHED]

Johnson, *

*

Appellant. *

_____________

 Submitted: September 16, 1997

Filed: September 19, 1997

_____________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Alvin J. Johnson appeals from the guidelines sentence imposed by the district

court. On appeal, Johnson renews the challenge he made in the district court, namely,

the 100-to-1 sentencing ratio for crack versus powder cocaine violates Johnson's equal

protection and due process rights. Johnson's challenge, however, is foreclosed by our

decisions upholding the constitutionality of the 100-to-1 ratio. See, e.g., United States

v. Carter, 91 F.3d 1196, 1197-99 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam); United States v.

Jackson, 67 F.3d 1359, 1367 (8th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 1684 (1996); see
-2-

also United States v. Jackson, 64 F.3d 1213, 1220 (8th Cir. 1995) (rejecting challenge

based on rule of lenity), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 966 (1996).

Accoridngly, we affirm Johnson's sentence.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The
undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of TG Venture Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”), for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:



(1) The Annual Report
of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2022, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 14, 2023



|/s/Philip Rettger                                                                                 | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Philip Rettger                                                                                    | 
|Chief Financial Officer & Director (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) | 



The foregoing certification
is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate disclosure document.
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110619c.en1.txt[10/3/2012 9:40:11 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0619 0620 Post-Focus Draft Revision 3 8/30/2012 ENGINEER: Austin \ AH

MSDS: Yes Label: No Gen Eqpt: Chemical resistant protective gloves, safety glasses with side-shields, body protection. Respirator: Wear a NIOSH-certified (or equivalent) respirator as necessary. Health Effects: Harmful if swallowed. May cause allergic skin reaction. May cause eye, skin and respiratory tract irritation. TLV/PEL: None established.file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110619c.en1.txt[10/3/2012 9:40:11 AM] Consumer Use: No SAT (concerns) (09/16/2011): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Migration to groundwater: Rapid PBT rating: P1B1T2 Amine salt: P1B1T2; Methanesulfon acid: P1B1T1 Health: Drinking Water, Inhalation Eco: Water (All releases to water with a CC = 770 ppb), XB Testing (Testing desired) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1A NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110619c.en1.txt[10/3/2012 9:40:11 AM] EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0619 0620file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110619c.en1.txt[10/3/2012 9:40:11 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0619 0620file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110619c.en1.txt[10/3/2012 9:40:11 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0619 0620file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110619c.en1.txt[10/3/2012 9:40:11 AM]file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110619c.en1.txt[10/3/2012 9:40:11 AM]file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110619c.en1.txt[10/3/2012 9:40:11 AM]
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 3, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7925]



[[Page 20045]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1999-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2012-0002]


Texas; Amendment No. 8 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Texas (FEMA-1999-DR), dated July 1, 2011, and related 
determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: March 15, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Texas is hereby amended to include the following areas 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of 
July 1, 2011.

Erath, Wichita, and Midland Counties for Public Assistance

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2012-7925 Filed 4-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BLACKWATER MIDSTREAM CORP. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael D. Suder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


November
      12, 2009
              
              By:/s/ Michael D. SuderMichael
      D. Suder, Chief Executive Officer